Amazon Microsoft Apple and Meta Report Earnings This Week - podcast episode cover

Amazon Microsoft Apple and Meta Report Earnings This Week

Jul 29, 202550 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

00:00 Intro02:20 Spotify06:30 United Health Group09:30 Sofi10:50 Visa & Mastercard12:15 Booking Holdings16:30 Starbucks and Cheesecake Factory18:40 Microsoft26:50 Meta31:01 Apple35:07 Amazon

Transcript

Welcome back, everyone. Today on the Joseph Carlson Show. We're about to get into the busiest earnings week of the entire season. This is a monster week full of juggernaut companies, ones like Microsoft and Meta and Apple and Amazon. They're all reporting this week. Plus we have a lot more. There's just simply a ton of companies reporting earnings this week that are notable, meaningful. This is by far, I think the one that's going to move the market

the most. Either the S&P 500 goes up as a result of this or it pulls back. Now going into Monday, we don't have anything too notable today, but Tuesday's where it all begins. Tuesday morning, we have Sofi, we have Spotify, and we have United Health Group. We'll be looking at all of those. I love Spotify, it's a great company. United Health Group is going through a massive sell off. We'll look at what to expect with United Health Group.

We have Visa reporting earnings aftermarket close on Tuesday. This is 1 where we've already seen American Express, but Visa's the biggest, most notable credit card company, so we'll be looking at that one. Then at the same time, we have a personal position of mine, booking holdings. This is a company that I've already made some money on. What are they going to be reporting tomorrow after market close? Well, I have some predictions.

We have Starbucks, Big Food chain, we have Cheesecake Factory, both reporting earnings after market close tomorrow. So just on Tuesday, we have a whole list of companies. It's a big day tomorrow, but moving into Wednesday, it doesn't slow down. We have Microsoft, Meta. I'll give you a playbook of what I expect from each one of these

companies. When we go into Thursday before market open, we have MasterCard. We'll already know a little bit about that one through Visa. So we have a little bit of insight into MasterCard at that point. Then we have another holding of mine, S&P Global. This is in fact one of my largest holdings in My Portfolio, so I'll be sharing some thoughts on that one. Then we get to Thursday after market close, which I believe is the biggest of them all. We have Apple and Amazon both

reporting earnings. I've owned both of these companies significantly at one point or the other, I was a Big Apple investor. I've sold most of my stake. We'll be going over that company and how I view it now and of course, Amazon. This is growing to become one of my biggest, if not my biggest bet in My Portfolio. I'm extremely bullish on Amazon going into these earnings and I'll be sharing why. So we'll be going through the week Monday through Friday, company by company and what to

expect for each of them. This is going to be a jam packed episode. Let's go ahead and get started Now. We start things off looking at Tuesday before market open, tomorrow before market open. We have United Health Group, we have Spotify, an we have so OFI reporting earnings. Let's go over all three of these companies. We'll start things off with Spotify. Spotify is one of the companies that I wish I had in My Portfolio.

You know those companies that you wish you owned, but you just never made the leap to actually building a position. There's a couple of those. There's Spotify and DoorDash and Shopify, Uber, you know those type of companies where they're great companies. You kind of knew they're great companies, but you never owned them. That's Spotify for me. I've always loved Spotify. I have tons of people that I know that you, Spotify and their lifelong customers. The lifetime value of a customer

of Spotify must be massive. People never cancel it. They just use it for year after year and I love that subscription based revenue. Now, the problem with Spotify, or at least the perceived problem years ago, is that the operating margins would never move up. They would just always be poor operating margins going negative, you know, never positive. And then all of that changed in 2024 when they rapidly went to

11%. So you've seen this with some platform based businesses like a Netflix, like a Uber, like a Spotify, you're seeing the same thing. The lesson here is it companies that can hold lifetime value of a customer for a a long period of time. They can just hang on to customers forever. Whether it's Costco, Netflix, Spotify, Amazon, these companies typically can find out ways to turn a profit in the exercise operating leverage. And you're seeing that here.

The free cash flow is just going parabolic. It went from basically nothing up to around $3 billion in free cash flow over the trailing 12 months. If we look at this in the euro, it's 2.6. So so we have massive free cash flows from this company. Spotify's also growing in a lot of important ways. They're growing in premium users, ad supported. They're being led by Daniel Eck, I believe, in a really good way. They're growing in engagement, the amount of consumption hours

on the platform. They're moving into different verticals of audiobooks and podcasts, video formats of podcasts on their platform. They're integrating comments. They're doing more and more. The company's on the move all the time. They're hyper focused on audio. So huge opportunity here. The monthly active users last quarter was 678,000,000. So we're getting close to that billion user mark and I believe this is going to go up another 8 to 12%. We'll see it up likely another

10% just like it has been. I don't think we're going to see much of A change of trajectory, which is a good thing for Spotify. When we go back to the calendar and we bring up the what to watch for, this takes a look at their latest earnings reports and it tries to gauge what are the most important KPIs and metrics to look at with this business. With Spotify, it's a subscriber based company. So that's of course the big

metric. Investors want to see continued subscriber growth, continued engagement, and I think they're going to get it. I believe investors are going to keep getting this because I see nothing changing. There's no notable new entrance of a competitor. There's no one venturing in. There's no real disruptive risk right now. Do you see any disruptive risk to Spotify? I don't. YouTube's existed for a long time, TikTok has. These companies have been around and Spotify continues to grow.

I don't see any change to their subscriber growth or engagement trends. We have advertising revenue momentum in market dynamics, they're growing and advertising as well. We're going to see them continue to do that. Profitability and operating margin expansion. This is where I'm most interested. Spotify got a big boost in their cash flows by cancelling some of their podcast investments. Is that going to continue? Outside of that, we have different formats in different AI enabled tools.

Overall, I expect a solid report from Spotify. I believe the stock is going to put up huge numbers. I think they're going to be on their subscribers and engagement trends. I don't know about the revenue or earnings per share. Sometimes they miss on that, sometimes they don't. But I believe overall the core business is really strong. My suspicion is we could have a scenario similar to Netflix where Spotify reports decent earnings, but the stock trades down a little bit simply because

evaluation. The stock is up huge like Netflix this year, up 53%. So I wouldn't be surprised if there's a bit of a fade after earnings, but that wouldn't concern me as an investor. If I own Spotify right here, I'd be happy just holding on to it now. Next up, we have United Health Group. Let's go ahead and take a look at this one. The simple story of United Health Group is this is a company that decided to cover too many things for too low of a price. They underpriced their services.

They try to gain too much market share, and then more people use their services. They use the insurance more than expected, which cause immense losses. So that's the way to kind of dumb down what's going on. There's also Department of Justice investigations and other litigations going on, as there often is in this industry. If you look at some of the metrics here, we have people served. This is declining over time. So the past couple of quarters is actually going down.

Never a KPI you want to see go that way. The revenue continues to go up are offering more crossover of services, but the number of people, the volume continues to decline and it's going to be tough to grow revenue on a consistent basis with the number of people they're serving going

down. When we look at the what to watch for, the biggest problem here, the top thing highlighted was United Health reported that care activity in its Medicare Advantage MA business increased at twice the expected rate in the first quarter with physician and outpatient services most notable. Investors should closely watch whether this trend persists or abates in the next quarter, as sustained elevated care utilization could continue to pressure medical ratios and earnings.

So basically it's highlighting here that the number one thing we should be looking at is whether or not people continue to use their health insurance at the same rate that they're doing last quarter. If they are, it's bad news for UNH, at least in the short term. The problem with this company again, is too many people are using the services. They underbid it. They wanted to gain market share, so they gave way their services at a lower price than

their competitors. And now everybody's using their health insurance and this is a retroactive problem. You can't go back and fix it. So if we have a situation here, which I believe is very likely that this upcoming quarter, people are still using their medical services and physician outpatient services as much as they were the previous quarter. I think that's likely that's going to hurt earnings in the

short term. The stock will likely fall, at least in the short term, or you won't see a rapid recovery as it's already fallen. But I want to highlight here that this is a temporary problem. Over time, over the next couple of years, they're going to reprice these plans. You'll have the rollout and initial fallout of the previously priced plans, but

those will slowly fizzle out. So I believe we're going to see a situation where United Health Group may not recover as fast as investors like it might not be a thing where you see a recovery in a month. So maybe we don't see that happen, But I still believe this stock is undervalued. I think that over the next three or four years, you'll see a gradual recovery back up to the four hundreds to four 50s back

up to where it was previously. So on United Health Group, you could call me short term concern, but long term bullish on the stock. I think that's a way of putting it. Now another one we have here is Sofi. I get asked about this stock all the time. Investors want to know what I think of this company. Sofi is a classic fintech technology company and bank mixed together.

You get Sofi. When I look at this company, it has some incredible KP is for example, the members, just the amount of members they have on their platform, it increases every single quarter. It's incredible to see this to 10.92 million. I don't think this quarter should be any different. I don't see any big changes in

the competitive landscape. When we look at the amount of products, we also see that they're doing a lot more financial service products basically every quarter, another basically linear graph going up over time. They have a minority of that being lending products. So I like that the majority of this is service based. I see a lot of competitors in the fintech space.

You have Sofi, you have Ally Financial, you have Robin Hood, you have all these companies competing for the same incremental dollar, the same wallet of everyone. And I think it's a little bit too diverse of a competitive landscape where I like owning one of the companies that's a huge winner in the category. And I have a hard time predicting what this one will do. The valuation is elevated, but this is the type of stock that if investors get a little bit of good news on it, it could rock

it up another 5 to 10%. Now after we get through Tuesday before market open, we have Tuesday after market close, we have a couple big companies reporting earnings. Then now we're going to get to the big tech companies, Meta, Microsoft, Apple, and Amazon later, but we have to get through these smaller ones first. Tuesday after market close, we have Visa, Booking Holdings and Starbucks all reporting earnings. Let's go ahead and start off with Visa.

When looking at Visa, I'm going to go ahead and group MasterCard with this one because they have so much overlap in their business model and Mastercard's going to trade. However Visa does. So Visa posts really good earnings and Tuesday MasterCard will likely move up. If Visa posts a little bit underwhelming, MasterCard will likely move down. They trade very similar. When we look at both of these companies, my simple prediction is you're going to see very steady, predictable earnings.

Simply put, they're going to be business as usual. I see no reason to believe in any of the data that Visa or MasterCard are going to blind side us with terrible reports. I look at companies that have reported earnings, companies that give up monthly updates, and so far it just looks like

people are spending money. Netflix reported great earnings, Costco shares their monthly revenue update, and people are spending money at Costco. Costco only accepts visas, so this company should buy the consumer. And some of the data points we have post steady predictable earnings. Now, I also expect to see on the calls of these two companies, a lot of commentary about stable coins as a competitive potential disruption. They're both overwhelmingly going to embrace stablecoin and

they're going to embrace crypto. I don't see stablecoin being a disruptive risk for these companies, and I believe investors can sleep well owning Visa, MasterCard. Now, we also get into another one here that's been under a little bit more debate, which is Booking Holdings. I own a fairly large stake of Booking Holdings in my consumer category. It's currently a $77,000 position, around $26,000 in the green. I bought this one looking hindsight at a really good time.

It dipped for what I believed was no reason whatsoever. They posted a great earnings report, then the stock dipped by 10%. I bought a big stake in the company and it since recovered. Now I want to be very clear with my prediction on Booking Holdings. I believe that their report's going to be incredibly strong, likely better than expected, because I believe the travel industry is far more resilient than what investors are expecting. This is usually considered one

of the weaker industries. Like you'll hear old analysts say that when the economy goes, travel's the first thing to go. But really what we've seen with the numbers is that that whole narrative doesn't really add up. I look at the quarterly revenue of this company and maybe some segments of travel struggle, but the only time this company has ever really ran into trouble is during COVID when people are literally locked down.

So I guess if you literally imprison people in their own homes, make it illegal to travel, require them to get vaccinations and go to that extremes, yeah, their product may take a hit. But outside of that, just look at the chart. There's nothing that keeps people in their houses forever. People want to go out and have experiences. Booking holdings is a representation of that wrapped up in an incredibly profitable

business model. So I look at this and whether or not it's it's slowing down a little bit, we can look at the past five years. So I guess it's tapering down a little bit in revenue, but we still see continual all time highs. We still see continual all time highs in their merchant and agency. They're moving to a Better Business model over time. We see all time highs in their room nights sold, meaning total volume of people traveling and booking rooms is growing.

And I think we're going to see more and more of this in the future. Again, outside of a one time pandemic that will never be repeated again in my lifetime, outside of that type of event, this company is growing like crazy easy. If we look at the ratios of this company, let's go ahead and just take a look at their gross margins. This isn't a lie. It's literally 100%. Sometimes it bounces down to 96%

or 97%. We have operating margins that beat the gross margins of most companies, 31% operating margins and then profit margins which are 25%. So not quite as good as a Visa or MasterCard, but incredibly good. And the margins are recovering from 2020. They're going to get better over time as they keep optimizing their service. What we expect to see in this upcoming calls is commentary on

the macroeconomic environment. And I've listened to enough of these calls that I know what the CEO is going to say. He's going to say that we've operated during pandemics and wars and financial crises and recessions. We've we've operated during all of it. And look at our company record high profits. People still want to travel. He believes that travel is innate to humans. It's just a part of our DNA. We don't want to stay in the same place forever.

We want to go out and have experiences. So if you believe that that's true, if you believe the narrative that people are always going to travel, then you're not as concerned with the macroeconomic uncertainty or geopolitical uncertainty. That type of stuff has always happened. Yet this company continues to grow. You're going to see direct booking and loyalty trends. They'll show off how many people are now using their apps instead of using the website.

One of the big efforts of booking is getting people more accustomed using the mobile app, and that usage has gone up. You have more partnerships that they're doing. You have alternative accommodations, connected trip expansions. They're trying to make their service more robust, connect to different companies. The last thing is artificial intelligence integration. Management has noted that they're integrating AI into

their service. That can be looked at as a threat to Booking Holdings or a benefit to this company, but management is leaning in on AI. When I look at Booking Holdings, the big threat that I see down the road is the potential for artificial intelligence to completely book a trip for you, do it in a Safeway, do it in a way that people enjoy, and do that at scale. I think that could potentially be a threat, but I don't believe we're there right now.

I think people like the rewards, they like the system, they like the UI of booking Holdings, and they have a huge advantage in advertising. So right now, I don't see that as a present thread. I'm holding all my shares going into these earnings now. Next on Tuesday after market close, we also have Starbucks and Cheesecake Factory reporting earnings. We'll group these two together as well because they're both food companies. They're in similar industries even though they they are a bit

different. Starbucks is QSR quick service restaurant. Get in and out with your coffee. Cheesecake is to go and have an experience, go and have fun, sit down with some family and friends and enjoy their huge menu. When I look at each of these companies, they both have different risks. The risk with Starbucks is luck and coffee and every other coffee joint that's popping up left and right. I see Starbucks is having an increase in the amount of competition over the upcoming years.

I think the company still has brand value. I think it will be fine over time, but I do see it as a more highly competitive place. And I see Starbucks at a point where they don't have as much pricing power. They've extended and exhausted all of their pricing power. You just can't raise prices anymore. And in fact, Starbucks is trying to win back customers by offering discounts and offering different app benefits to try to get people to use their app again.

We want to see the amount of stores increase over time, as well as the amount of rewards member and overall the revenue. We've had flat revenue over the past year. So Starbucks hit a wall. They price people out of their stores. There's an increase in competition, and it still trades at a relatively healthy valuation. So this isn't some super undervalued company. When we look at Cheesecake Factory, this one has some risks, but I believe they're a little bit lesser than Starbucks.

But the thing that I don't love in Cheesecake Factory and the thing that's kept me out of the company is simply the revenue growth. It's typically anywhere from 4 to 7%. Most of the gains from this company, which I've been quite good over the past couple years, have come from multiple expansion. So this company is volatile. It goes down into big dips.

You see it going back up to a spike right now, and a lot of that is the multiples moving back up because the company's been trading at a cheaper PE ratio. Out of the two, I'd rather own Cheesecake Factory than Starbucks. I believe it has less disruptive risk, even though it's slower moving, it's at a better valuation. All right, now we finally got here. We have our first big Tech company of the week Wednesday after market close.

We have Microsoft and Meta both reporting earnings at the same time. Let's go ahead and start things off with Microsoft. Now, the first thing I have to say about Microsoft is I've owned this company for a long period of time. I've been super bullish on Microsoft. It's always been one of my top

positions. If we look at the weighting of my combined portfolio, we have S&P Global at the top, Amazon, Netflix, then in fourth place at 8.6%, we have Microsoft and this one is around a $109,000 position with 51,000 of that being gains. So it's around an 89% gain overtime. Even though I've been dollar cost averaging up, I have been buying more of this company. The most recent buy I did was around 22230I continued to buy a little bit trailing up, and then I tapered off.

So I've bought recently, just in 2022, but then I've held the company and I haven't trimmed at all. Even though Microsoft is trading at a share price of 513. I refuse to trim this company. I won't do it for a couple of reasons. First of all, I've continually, throughout the history of my channel, referred to Microsoft as the poster child for the perfect fundamentals, meaning that this company represents some of the perfect fundamentals you'll ever see in a company. Long term revenue growth

overtime, it's just gorgeous. The diversification of revenue both through segment and geography, highly diversified in every way possible, but it's all good. So it's not diversification, it's high quality diversification. All of these are great revenue segments. You have a highly profitable business model that's been software. Software has been such a good place to be, highly recurring lock in, high lifetime value and high margins. Then you have cash flow generation.

Now the free cash flow just went parabolic over the past couple of years from 2018 to current day. And even though they're doing massive CapEx investments, which is directly subtracted out of their free cash flow metric, their free cash flow is growing. So Microsoft is great. And even though most people understood that Microsoft is a great company, they didn't understand it enough. They didn't know how good it was that it would really persevere

this much and grow this much. When we look at Microsoft, the big problem or at least the question right now is evaluation of the company. If we look at the valuation over the past five years and we look at the free cash flow yield, this means that the lower this goes, the more expensive Microsoft is. So this is the cash you're getting per $100 you're invested, represented in a yield form. So out of $100 I'm investing, I get $1.83 back over the trailing 12 months.

Just a couple years ago in 2022, I was getting $4.00 back. So Microsoft trades at roughly 100%, almost double the valuation it did just a couple years ago on a price to earnings ratio. This is inverted, where the higher this chart is, the more expensive Microsoft is. Again, in 2022, the stock was at around $220 per share. It was trading at a 26 PE ratio. That was the cheapest Microsoft

has traded for a long time. We look at it and it typically trades in the high 30s based on the quality of the company. And then more recently, we look again and it's the most expensive. It's been right at the peaks over the past five years. So Microsoft is trading at a higher valuation today than almost anytime throughout its history. Microsoft does have more fundamental differences today to justify the valuation than it

even did a couple years ago. This company is transforming for the better, and this transformation is being highlighted by the CEO of the company, which is Satya Nadella. He recently released a memo just a couple days ago called recommitting to our Why, What, and How. Now, this memo is a couple pages long, so I'm not going to read through it here, but I'll summarize some of the things that he talked about in the overall theme of this memo.

The big thing that Satya Nadella argues for in this memo is that Microsoft has always been known as a software company. They build software, they build user interfaces, they build applications, and they sell them on this residual license that you pay every single month, a typical software company. But he's saying that their identity is transforming, that they're no longer going to be viewed as a software company. They're no longer going to be even work as a software company.

Instead, they're an intelligence engine powering the rest of the world with AI solutions and tools. They're now going to be primarily an AI company, AI first, not a software company. Everything that they're doing with Azure and all of their, the things that they're building are built specifically with AI to power other companies with AI. It also changes their list of priorities.

Now they're a lot more focused on security and quality of their tools and transforming from the software company to the AI company. In the process, they're doing layoffs, so they're restructuring and Microsoft regularly does this. Overtime they'll do layoffs and then they'll hire a lot of people in the future. This is what they do, but you can see the transformation happening. They're no longer trying to view themselves as an old fashioned software company.

They're now an AI engine company. I believe that's the right vision for the company and that Satya Nadella is still transforming this company in a positive way. He first did this by going head first into Microsoft Azure. This was the main direction of the company that he took it, and that was the right direction.

Now transforming from software into artificial intelligence is another good move for Microsoft. With Azure growth and dynamics and AI integration being top of mind for investors, investors should closely watch the growth trajectory of Azure. The evolving blend of AI and non AI workloads on Azure means demand trends and revenue benefits may be increasingly difficult to disentangle and the continued success of both components will be important. This is something that Andy

Jesse also highlights. He says, yeah, AI is great and all it's, it's great to be going that direction, but there's still just a lot of basic IT stuff that hasn't been into the cloud. So he's saying we're, we're pushing full steam ahead in AI, but there's so much workloads that are still being done locally that should be done in the cloud. So you see that growing with Azure. We want to see strong AI growth and we want to see growth overall.

The next thing is cloud infrastructure investments and capacity constraints. We just saw that Google upped the amount that they're investing in cloud. This puts a lot of pressure on Microsoft. To give you a reminder, we can look up Google Cloud here and take a look at one of the KPIs, which is their cloud backlog. This grew by 37 1/2%, almost 38% to $108 billion. So they have a massive backlog that they're growing really

fast. Microsoft will have the pressure on investors want to see this continued capacity constraint. They want to see the continued investment in Microsoft Azure.

We want to see Copilot and AI product monetization tracking adoption rates of customer engagements on Copilot and other AI driven products across Microsoft 365, Dynamics 365 and Security Solutions. A lot of people will be critical of Copilot as kind of an addon AI, but the truth is that many people already using a lot of Microsoft services are just going to sign U with whatever integrates easiest, whatever's already kind of included in the package.

And that's copilot. So Microsoft is again using their bundling and their huge offering to enhance one of the other products, which is copilot. Microsoft will continue to balance keeping their margins high while making the meaningful investments. They're really good at this. They're only going to invest where they see a high return. So if Microsoft bumps up their CapEx, I will look at that as a good thing.

I'm not going to sell my stock or be concerned because CapEx is going up and I believe margins will take a temporary hit. I'd be OK if Microsoft has to do more CapEx. We've already seen how good the cloud business is overall, despite the share price of $513, despite the fact this company trades at a five year high valuation, I'm still not selling because it's in such a good situation. The price may ebb and flow a little bit. I could see it going up or down a couple percentage after

earnings. But overall this company is so fundamentally strong that even though I don't think it's the best time to be buying into Microsoft, I'm certainly not selling my shares and I think that it will continue to have incredibly strong fundamentals. Now Next up, reporting at the same time we have Meta, which is the company that no matter how big it gets, it always has room to get bigger.

This is one of the companies that always, it always impresses me how many people there are out there to continually use their services. The family daily active people metric for example, was at 2 billion in 2019 and it just continues to grow quarter after quarter now to 3.43 billion. I believe it's going to continue to go up and it shows you the total addressable market for these types of companies. They have free applications that are ad supported.

Virtually everyone on planet earth can use them, anybody that has a mobile device. So Meta's continually growing the amount of people using their service, and then they're growing the revenue with the users they already have year over year, causing the company to grow the top line around 20% year over year. It's one of the fastest growth rates of any big tech company. Like all of these big tech companies, they have to involve AI into every part of their

business. With Meta, they've obviously done this to optimize their advertisements, but now they're going a step further, doing some similar things to Amazon, where you have generative ads recommended with their model GEM. So basically what Zuckerberg trying to do here is make it so an advertiser can click a button or type in what they want the advertisement to be about. The gem. GEM will make an ad for that advertiser and then they can sell it on Meta.

And I like the thought here. If an advertiser can save money and time on building the ad, then they can spend more money and time on actually paying for ads to be ran. Meta is trying to automate part of the advertiser's job so that they can spend more money on Meta. And I think overall that's a great plan. The other big thing, like any of these big tech companies, is going to be looking at their infrastructure.

This company used to be looked at as just a social media company, but now it's more looked at as the rails of communication across the globe. They own so many assets. They're building such huge infrastructure. They're wrapping all of this with AI. There's become a lot more high MO of a company. It has a durable logistics mode now, even a technological mode. Now in terms of how the stock will trade, it's always a coin

flip. But with Meta, you have reason to believe that it might cool off a little bit more than expected. The company trades at a valuation of a 27 PE ratio, where you have other companies like Google trading at around an 18 right now. I believe that Google's the undervalued 1. I think Meta's at more of a full valuation and if anything, I believe that Google should get up to around the same valuation as Meta, around a 25 to 26 Ford PE ratio.

That leaves more upside for an advertising giant like Google than there is for Meta. But you're buying with Meta at this point is that you never know. This company has wildly outperformed investors and analyst expectations before, so there is a chance they do it again and they come in way above expectations. After Microsoft and Meta report earnings on Wednesday, it's not done yet. We move on to Thursday and before market open on Thursday, we have one important company,

company. This is my largest holding in My Portfolio, which is S&P Global. If we look at this here, we can take a look at S&P Global. It's barely my largest holding, just above Amazon and just above Netflix. When we look at S&P Global, there's a reason that this is my largest position and frankly it's just because I believe it's

an indestructible company. Out of all the companies that could run into problems and disruptions and regulations and different things that could hurt them, I believe that S&P Global is one of the most insulated. It's one of the the widest Moat companies in the entire market. With this one, what we're looking at this week is we want to see progress on the mobility division spin off. They announced that they're

spinning off that business. We want to see what's going on with it, how much money they're going to earn, when that will be completed. We also want to see bond issuance and rating revenue trends. The rating business, even though it's super wide mode, it's a bit more cyclical than other businesses. But after a robust Q1, management foresees A moderation. And then this company is a tech company. They're constantly launching new products, new database products all the time.

We want to see the new types of things they're coming out with and the overall pace of product innovation. SNP Global's another one that causes me no anxiety. There's no stress in holding this company. I think the report's going to be great. I continue to hold all my shares. Now finally, we get to Thursday after market close. This is where we get to another huge after close day. We have Apple and Amazon both reporting earnings. Let's go ahead and start things off with Apple.

I owned a lot of Apple stock. In fact, it was one of my biggest positions for a long period of time on my channel. I've made dozens of videos around the company. So this is a stock that I've studied for a long period of time. And I really like ALE. I love the products. I'm a fanboy of the company. I like their designs. But I sold ALE early this year for a couple concerns. If we look at the revenue over the past three years, quarter by quarter on a trailing basis,

this is what it looks like. This is 3 full years we have from Q32022 to Q1 of 2025 and the revenue is almost the exact same. So we have stagnant revenue. I just don't own businesses that have flat or no growth revenue, especially on a multi year basis. It's very difficult to get solid returns from a company that has flat revenue. You can sometimes do it if they squeeze out a tremendous amount of margin, but in most cases the

returns aren't going to be good. Now when we look at Apple, it has flat revenue while trading at a premium valuation. So you have a near 30 PE ratio on a forward basis. You have a 3% free cash flow yield 2 1/2% while having flat revenue. When I look at what to watch for with this company, you have some macro concerns like the tariff and supply chain impact. I don't find that quite as interesting as other investors. None of that stuff feels

intrinsic to the company. Even though it may be a short term concern. I wouldn't sell Apple solely because of tariffs or supply chain impacts. They're really good at figuring that stuff out. The part that I have more of a problem with with Apple, the bigger concern is their lack of AI integration into the iPhone. Apple Intelligence and AI integration into the iPhone has been a massive let down. The roll out and consumer adoption of Apple Intelligence features, including on device

cloud based AI remain pivotal. The March quarter data showed stronger year over year iPhone 16 performance in markets where Apple Intelligence was available. So even with their current Apple Intelligence, it's boosting sales and they can see that in the numbers. But I'd say that the current version of Apple intelligence is still not that intelligent. They advertised it like it's like having ChatGPT built into your phone.

Your phone is now this incredible personal assistant that can intuitively understand you. But what we got was text summaries that after using it for some time, I disabled because I didn't really like them. That's not the Apple intelligence that we had advertised to us. So I believe they're falling behind in Apple intelligence in

this new growth path for them. Now they have a lot of time because Apple still has a huge Moat, so they have a lot of time to figure this out, but right now they're not figuring it out. The other thing that we're always watching for with Apple is that this is now a service based company. They've outgrown just the hardware sales portion. They're now growing in Apple TV, they're growing in Apple Insurance and Apple Care, they're growing in Apple Music and all these different services.

And we want to see continued growth because again, outside of that, they're not growing that much in just pure device sales. Now the service business is still growing and it's growing at a decent pace. But I will note that the pace of services is also slowing down 12% year over year growth. It used to be growing at 1718%. So we even see this important revenue line of Apple slowing down a little bit.

Apple is still a high quality, high margin company with a wide Moat. It's not in any type of huge trouble. There's no big concern for Apple. The biggest concern for me is that I'm a growth investor. I like investing in companies that strong fundamentals growing at a brisk pace, faster than the market. Apple's now growing slower than

the market. It's moved into more of a mature, slow growing, high quality company, company that will produce earnings per share growth and free cash flow per share growth purely through share buybacks and financial engineering more than top line revenue growth. For that reason, even though I don't believe that this earnings will be bad for Apple, I think they'll do just fine. It's not a particularly interesting stock for me today.

Now finally, we get to Amazon reporting earnings at the same time as Apple Thursday after market close. This is going to be a highly anticipated one, especially for me because Amazon as a company, I've continually built up my position. I've been bullish on Amazon for years and this stock has gone through a lot. But I feel like Amazon is really showing its strength over the

past couple of years. We look at it today in My Portfolio and both the story fund and the passive income portfolio combined, this is $1.2 million combined. Amazon is the second largest position. So I've built it up even past even past Netflix, even though Netflix has a lot more gains. Amazon is starting to move up with $49,000 in the green. Overall, I have around $140,000

invested in this company. If we zoom out a little bit with Amazon here just past this quarter and we look into the future, there's a reason that I'm excited about Amazon and I'll include Google on this as well. I know Google reported earnings already, but this will make

sense in a minute. When we look at Amazon and Google and we compare these two companies to other tech leaders, companies like Tesla and many of the thoughts that investors have, I believe that these companies are better positioned in a couple different ways. For example, when I look at Amazon, I view Amazon as the best position company in the world today for humanoid robots. Robots in the human form, powered by AI, they could feasibly accomplish all sorts of

different tasks. The reason that the humanoid form is so important is because our world is built around humans. We're the ones that build it. So if a robot has the same form factor as us, it can do all sorts of stuff that humans could do, but it could do it for longer hours, It could do a lower pay, right? It does it without having to take healthcare, without taking vacation, without complaining, without going on strike, and so

on and so forth. The company that could tackle humanoid robots could feasibly be worth a lot. Elon Musk continually talks about how the company that figures out humanoid robots could be worth trillions or have trillions of dollars in revenue, not just be worth trillions but have trillions in revenue. And while that's true, I again believe that Amazon is better positioned than Tesla for humanoid robots. Now, Tesla likes to share a lot of things they do in development.

So with their humanoid robot, they have it like making popcorn and serving people popcorn. It's later revealed that that's people controlling it. They're controlling it through like AVR system. So it's not really AI controlling it yet. It's basically just the robot and it's being teleoperated. Amazon so far doesn't advertise their technology in the same way. They don't have like these type of PR stunts or whatever you want to call them, different things that Tesla does to excite

investors. Instead, Amazon's reportedly testing this type of technology silently. They're testing it behind closed doors. The publication called The Information actually blew the lid on this when someone reported to them in Amazon. The Amazon is preparing to test humanoid robots for delivering packages. Reportedly what's going on here is Amazon has a whole warehouse where they've set up different

tests for a a robot that walks. It's bipedal, it walks on 2 feet and it's trying to pick up a package that's under like 20 lbs and bring it from a truck to someones doorstep. And they create all sorts of obstacles and different things that can happen, different interactions. And they're trying to test how well it can accomplish that task. Because if of course they can figure that out and they can do it at scale, they could replace feasibly around 400,000 delivery drivers.

That's something that could happen long into the future. So this gives you the idea that Amazon is testing this out. They're working on it. Tesla's not the only company that's trying to test out humanoid robots. We have big juggernauts in tech like Amazon working on this problem. But Amazon's also really unique in the fact that they have an immense amount of employees. Let's go ahead and just take a look at some of the figures

here. This moves around a little bit, but Amazon has around 1.56 million employees. If we look at Tesla and we compare the amount of employees that Tesla has that they could feasibly automate with humanoid robots, it's around 125,000. Amazon not only could develop humanoid robots, but it's a company that will dramatically benefit in their margins if they're able to pull it off. They have hundreds of thousands, if not millions of employees.

They could replace or at least reduce the need for all this physical labor with humanoid robots. So Amazon has far more to gain than most companies in the world by cutting down on all this routine repetitive tasks that these employees do by building out humanoid robots. And we also know that Amazon is not new to robotics. They've done this for a long period of time. They have over reportedly 1,000,000 active robots working

in their facilities. And although they're not humanoid, they do use artificial intelligence. They're just in form factors best used to serve their specific purpose. But they're using all sorts of different AI. They're not just using pre programmed rule sets. They're using actual artificial intelligence to learn and to solve problems. So Amazon has already been doing AI enabled robots for some time. They're just going to try to bring this to the humanoid form

factor. So I believe that Amazon is a better humanoid robot play than Tesla. And when we look at Google, I view Google as a better robot taxi play than Tesla. That's why I'm invested in both of these companies. The different long shot disruptive tech bets. These companies both have optionality. They both have the ability to invest in these given categories, and I believe they're leading in them. For example, with Google, I believe that they're best set up with Waymo to capture a huge

portion of the robotaxi network. They're going to be, I think, a huge player, if not the biggest. Right now, they're by far the biggest. Sure, Tesla's trying to roll this out, but so far they have safety drivers in the passenger seat of every vehicle. Google's doing this without any safety drivers. So right now we have this interesting situation where the narrative for Tesla is that it's going to be the humanoid robot play and it's going to be the

robotaxi play. But you look at Amazon and I believe they're a better humanoid robot play. And you look at Google and I believe they're better robotaxi play. But in the case that I'm wrong on either of these companies, I'm still in a better situation with Google. Even if Waymo feasibly went to a zero, it wouldn't really matter too much for Google's future. The Other Bets is such an insignificant amount of revenue right now that Google will be just fine without Waymo.

The company will thrive. The core businesses that you fall back on if this other bet doesn't work out are tremendously profitable businesses at a low valuation. Google set up well whether or not Waymo does well or not. So even if they lose in robotaxi, my investment in Google's just fine. We look at Amazon and what happens if I'm wrong with Amazon and they're really not the

winner in humanoid robots? In that case, I'm still fine with Amazon. This company, like Google, has many incredible core businesses to fall back on. You have first party online sales, which is low margin, but they're the dominant share of it. They have this gigantic logistics network that can be incredibly profitable with just a few margin percent increases. You have third party seller services. You have advertising, which they layer upon their first party

sales. You have subscription businesses through things like Amazon Prime Video. They're the second biggest in streaming video. Then of course, you have Amazon Web Services, the biggest cloud hosting platform. Amazon will be just fine even if they don't win in Humanoid Robots. Humanoid robots is just a call option on the company. It's a different optionality that investors can look forward to. And even though they're well positioned for it, they have ample experience in robotics.

They have their own manufacturing plant for robots that they've made over a million of them in. They're testing out new humanoid robots. Even if all of that doesn't work out, the company's still fine. So in either case, if Amazon doesn't win in humanoid robots, it's fine. If Google doesn't win in robotaxi, it's fine. Both of them have incredible core businesses to fall back upon. But what happens with the Tesla investor? If they're not right in robotaxi or humanoid robots, what happens

to that business? You have a car business to fall back upon, one that has increasing levels of competition from China and it's losing a tax credit. The car business is a very tough business. That's not a great core business to fall back upon. So Tesla investors are in a situation that they need these

things to work out. Tesla has to have these newer business models work out because the core business to fall back upon isn't as strong and the valuation already implies huge growth in these new revenue segments. So when I look at either of these companies, when I look at going into Amazon, there's a lot of optionality going into this week. Now when we look at this company and what to watch for going into this earnings, we have AWS and generative AI growth and capacity.

Obviously for all three of these companies, whether it's Amazon, Microsoft or Google, the big question is always cloud, how much is it going to grow, what you know, what is the operating margins of it? We're going to be looking at that top of mind going into Amazon. The previous quarter highlighted AWS robust performance with a 17% year over year revenue increase and multi billion dollar AI businesses growing at triple digit rates.

So they're separating just normal on premise to cloud and then the AI products they have as well. Now when we look at Amazon and we breakdown the growth rate of Amazon Web Services, this is what it looks like over time from 2015. It started off at around 60%. Obviously that hyper growth rate just is not sustainable. No cloud company can sustain it for long. So ebbed and flowed for a while, but they they kept it around 2030% for a while. Back in 2021.

It bounced back up to 40% and then it slowed down dramatically and a lot of people were really concerned around this when it slowed down to 12%. This is in early 2023. Now with artificial intelligence, lots more cloud momentum, it picked back up from around 12% back up to around 18%. Last quarter it was 17%. And if I have to predict going into this quarter, I think we're going to get around 17%. I think it'll be around the same

as it was last quarter. So my guess is, and again, I don't know for sure, but my guess is it's going to be around 17%. Amazon's redesign and its inbound network and regionalization of fulfillment centers are driving record delivery speeds while reducing costs. I don't know if you've noticed this, but I have more and more items that I order and they are at my doorstep the very next morning. I don't know how Amazon's doing it. Some of them seem like very obscure items.

These aren't like really, you know, it's not like batteries that I'm ordering. These are a lot of obscure, odd items. And they still get there a day in less than a day, sometimes in like 12 hours. They say that they're placing an emphasis on better inventory placement and optimizing packaging.

So I think part of how they get things to you so soon is they basically predict what you're going to order before you order it. So they just know what you're going to buy and they put it in a fulfilment center close to you. Obviously, artificial intelligence is playing a big role in this. They say any progress on these fronts can directly affect operating margins in unpredictable, unpredictable

macroeconomic conditions. So we want to see efficiencies with the cost structure and the speed of delivery of their fulfilment. The other one is the tariff impact and inventory strategy. Now what I've seen over the past couple of months is the concern that we had about tariffs. They basically fizzled out to nothing. We know that President Trump looks at the market. He's going to respond if the market drops. We know that he's made a lot of deals already.

There is just a new one with the EU. And it seems like a lot of this is more in line with reasonable expectations. I don't think there's going to be as much panic around tariffs as there was a couple months ago. I don't worry about tariffs because they're not an intrinsic part of this company, just like I don't worry about them with Apple. It's not the biggest concern. Everyday essentials now represent a significant and fast growing portion of Amazon's

sales. Now, again, all of this works together because if the fulfillment network is getting stuff to you within 12 hours, you may end up ordering stuff like toilet paper and toothpaste and batteries, stuff that you would previously pick up at the grocery store. Now if you can just get it at the click of a button, you get it within 12 hours, you're going to start ordering more and more frequently from Amazon. The next thing that we can look

at is advertising. Amazons advertising business grew 19% year over year last quarter to $13.9 billion in revenue. The advertising is often viewed by investors as like this separate business. We have advertising right here in the green and it's a super fast growing segment. Let's cross it out here. It grew 19% right year over year. We'd like to segment this and silo it off as though advertising just exists in a vacuum. But in reality it's part of the first party online sales.

It's part of the third party seller services. If you can improve the third party seller services similar to how Met is doing having generative AI ads, that's going to increase the advertising segment revenue. If you sell more items on 1st party online sales, that's going to increase the advertising. So this can't be looked at in a

silo. You have to look at advertising as part of third party seller services, as part of first party online sales, and as part of the subscription services with Amazon Prime Video. All of that plays a role in advertising. They note here that the expansion of a full funnel advertising solution across channel measurement and integration with the company's Prime Video, Twitch and other properties are important trends.

Investors should pay attention to the continued adoption of these offerings, competitive positioning against other digital ad platforms, and the impact of North American international operating margins, a signal of further monetization scale in the business overall. There's a lot of things to get excited about with Amazon. There's a reason why I love talking about this company, why I love investing so much into it, why it's my second largest position today.

They are in a very unique position to become a monstrously huge company. Amazon is one of the few that has so much optionality baked into the business model. I can easily see the stock doubling from here. I've talked about it before when the company was at 16170, that it's going to 2:20, that it's going to go to 2:40. We're already on the way there. I think we could see it at 260

to 280 at the end of this year. In this earnings report, I wouldn't pay attention too much to the after hours trading. Amazon is too big of a company to try to figure out what really happened just by a couple metrics being reported. You have to read over the entire earnings report, look at the earnings call to figure out how this business is actually evolving. So I'll be a little bit patient with Amazon, but I'm very bullish going into this quarter.

Now that's going to wrap up the busiest earnings week of this season. If you want to see my reaction and post analysis after these companies report earnings, if you want to see some of the KPIs and the different visuals of their new financials, just make sure you subscribe to the channel. That's all for now. See you in the next one.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android