And we continue at one oh five in the afternoon on the John Phillips Show, Mister Randy Wings in Culver City.
John, we are truly living in the future. The DMV has just authorized changes. The cops can now give traffic tickets to weaymos.
Wait, how do you give a traffic ticket to someone who doesn't exist?
Good question. I guess they call the company and send them a ticket through email.
What if the weaimo's drunk.
Well, if you put some of that ethanol in there, it would be drunk.
Maybe they can play it down to a wet, reckless eight hundred two two two five two two two is a telephone number one eight hundred two to two two five two two two. Well, we know that the greedy SCIU wants a wealth confiscation tax on the ballot this November, targeting billionaires because they know the states broke and they're trying to grab as much cash as possible while it's available.
Since they announced that they were pursuing this, over a trillion dollars in wealth has already left the state of California. And as we learn more about this initiative, an initiative by the way, where they say they have the required number of signatures to qualify for the ballot. Randy, there are even more disturbing details than we initially thought.
A business group that opposes the billionaire tax has read the language of this thirty five page proposition, and inside it apparently is language that would allow the legislature to change the terms whenever they want. Like let's say they decide they want to make this a millionaire.
Tax, or they can say, look look at all of the people who are millionaires on paper because they bought a home in the San Fernando Valley in the nineteen eighties and they're paying Prop thirteen taxes on it. Let's go get them for unrealized games.
For more on this, here is kcra three and Ashley Zavala go live.
Look at the state capitol right now. We're supporters of the California Billionaires tax say that the proposal is now a step closer to possibly going to voters this November. That proposal places a one time they say, five percent tax on billionaires and their assets to fund.
Does anybody believe that this is a one time assessment?
Oh no, no, this is testing the waters to see how far they can go. Healthcare programs.
What a major business group is warning there is a hidden piece of this proposal that could expand the tax to more people in different ways. Our CACRI and three political director Ashes of Alla joins us with what both sides are saying.
Ashley, Yeah, this is a discussion that's happening online right now about this piece of the proposal. The California Business Roundtable lobbies on behalf of the state's largest businesses. That group is warning that buried in the Billionaire's Tax is a line that could allow state lawmakers to impose this tax beyond billionaires without voter approval. The Billionaire's Tax Proposal is thirty two pages long and talks about.
How why would this need to be thirty two pages long unless they're trying to hide stuff in there.
It's like Judge Judy always used to say, the world isn't that complicated. If you make something complicated, it's because you're trying to hide something from me.
The Billionaire's Tax Proposal is thirty two pages long and talks about how this whole tax would work.
Now.
The group is worried specifically about a section on page twenty six that states, quote the Legislature.
May amend the twenty twenty six.
Billionaire tax by statute passed in each House of the Legislature by roll call vote entered into the journal two thirds of the membership concurring if the statute is consistent with and furthers the purpose of the twenty twenty six billionaires tax.
Armor.
The spokesperson for the California Business Roundtable explains the group's concern with that it's.
A massive expansion of the legislature's ability to tax not just billionaires. But they can choose to change the tax threshold, they can choose to pick different property that gets taxed.
But what it really does is it gives the legislature the.
Ability and the power to tax anybody's savings account, retirement accounts. It puts all of that path.
Wait, they're going to tax my savings account, all one hundred dollars I have in there.
Well, and just think about this. If they want to get creative, they can tax just about anything. So a pension is something you haven't drawn yet. If you're under the age of sixty five or under the age of whatever, it is that you can start to tap into your pension or thank any heart condition. HiT's a little close to home, doesn't it. But they could go after that. But how about this, And people don't talk about this often, but I think we're headed in this direction. Randy, You
and I like Hilton Honors points. If you really think about it, Yeah, if you really think about it, your American Airlines advantage miles, your Hilton Honors points, all of those programs you have through your credit card or through loyalty to a specific brand that's really currency by a different name. So if they want to go after that, they can go after that too. The sky is the limit here.
If they start going after points, I'm going to Sacramento with a torch.
Power in the legislature after voters if they pass this.
You know, technically the legislature.
Can already impose new taxes.
But the concern here, I guess, is that because voters approve it, they could point back to this and make it a bit easy to go through that.
Process as that.
Yeah, the voters said we could do this, they voted for it.
Yeah, at this point, the framework would have been laid.
I mean, it's the same nonsense every time the legislature defends the gas tax. They point to when the gas tax was on the ballot to be repealed in twenty eighteen, and it got it did not pass because it was titled the Defund Roads and Bridges Act. The legislature can say the population likes the gas tax, they voted to uphold it, and keep.
In mind, even though they have a two thirds majority, they are not going to go against the will of the public too often, particularly in the Assembly where they're up for reelection every two years. But we also live in a state that has voter imposed term limits. So even if you're in the state Senate and you have a four year term, after twelve years, you turn into a pumpkin. So you're going to want to go back
and be the of your city. You're going to run for Congress, you're going to run for a statewide office. You're going to go to your board of supervisors. And if you are the author or you were someone who voted for something that is politically unpopular, that's going to be used against you. So it's really important for voters to send a clear message to Sacramento that we don't want this.
How you're interpreting it certainly. And then there it also allows.
Could the legislature also change where the money goes. I wonder because one of the strange things about this tax is it would not go to the general fund. The money is specifically directed towards the SEIU Healthcare Union that put it on the ballot, and some of it to the teachers Union. I wonder if that language allows the legislature to say, Nope, we're not given SEIU that money.
Who knows how you're interpreting it, certainly, And then there it also allows for certain property that's a tax that's you know, protected right now by taxpayers, like Prop thirteen and different proper.
It gives a legislature a workaround on things like Prop thirteen where the lege lature can.
Now it would not be an election if there wasn't some way to damage Prop thirteen.
No, it's funny because I remember this going back to my days as an undergraduate at cal State Fullerton. You talk to the old timey lefties, the people who were around in the nineteen seventies when we had the debate over Prop thirteen, and they regard Prop thirteen as original sin. They really despise Prop thirteen. They from their point of view, the state went to hell or started going to hell when Prop thirteen passed. Prop thirteen to them was the beginning of the end.
It gives a legislature a workaround on things like Prop thirteen where the legilature can now tax property under the wealth tax provisions and they can expand that, which they can't do right now because that's constitution protected. But this measure would be a workaround on that as well, which is also very concerning.
We can't tax you an increase rate in your property taxes because of Prop thirteen, but like you said, they can figure out a way to tax your unrealized gains in the equity in your home. That is a disaster.
Oh yeah, and again I know I sound like a broken record. That gives them the ability to go after any number of things that you're not thinking about right now.
Now.
Rereached out to the healthcare union backing and trying to get this on the ballot the UHW for comment, It's chief of staff Susan.
What if they go as far is right into your wallet and you've got one of those punch cards at the sub shop and they're going to tax your tenth free sub. They could that's an unrealized gain.
Now rereached out to the healthcare union backing and trying to get this on the ballot. The UHW for comment, it's chief of staffs and Jimenez had quote, the California Business Roundtable is lying, period, and they are once again ignoring the fact that federal healthcare cuts from the Big Beautiful Bill are already crushing the businesses they are supposed
to represent. She goes on to say, as section five oh three one zero of the Billionaire's Tax says, any amendments cannot change the fundamental purpose of the act, which is to impose a one time tax on billionaires. Obviously, there are two very different interpretations of this line that's in this proposal. It's really to be seen first if the steven gets on the.
Ballot well, and the group says it turned in enough signatures for it to qualify for the ballot yesterday, where's the update with that.
Yeah, it'll take some time before we know if that's for sure. According to the Secretary of State's website.
Now we do know the SEIU Healthcare Union says that they have nearly double the signatures that they need to get this thing on the ballot. But what we do know anecdotally from some of our listeners is that anytime they've been asked to sign that petition, they have signed it with just the best names ever, Harry Chek, he loves the billionaire tax.
Keep in mind also, when you look at this, is that you're always lied to. When there's a tax increase on the bellet. They always tell you it's temporary, and then they make it permanent. And then they go, well, you don't want to cut healthcare, do you. You don't want to cut education, do you. You don't want to cut social services, do you? And if you allow this
tax to expire, then that's what you're doing. So they sell it as a one time thing or a temporary thing, and then they go back on their word almost immediately and act as if yesterday doesn't exist. And we know, because we've caught them doing this. They are already polling whether or not it would be politically palatable in California to shift it from billionaires to millionaires. And we know this because one of the ways that polling is done
now is not just over the phone. It's over email or they text you, and there are people, there are listeners who screenshot those questions and sent them in.
You remember in twenty sixteen when La County was trying to get everyone to pass Measure H and La City was trying to get everyone to pass Measure HHH. This was the homeless sales tax increases that were for ten years, and Eric Garcetti and the then Bord of Supervisors promised, if we pass this, we will wipe out homelessness in ten years. Well you know what happened. Ten years later. Homelessness went up, and they decided to put all.
This passes just as bad as it ever was, and they.
Also decided to increase the tax to double and make it in perpetuity with no plan to ever end the tax, because we're going to need it forever.
The signature verification process has not yet started on this as CiU UHW says it collected and submitted about one point five million signatures, which is more than enough to go to voters in November again if those signatures are verified, but again it could be months before that signature counting process is finalized and that the initiative is official.
We'll keep following it along with you, Thanks, Ashley.
So there you go. That is the latest on some hidden language that might make the billionaire's tags eventually affect you.
It's the John Phillips Show. If you'd like to email the show, you can do show at Johnny don't like show at gmail dot com. That's Johnny don't like show at gmail dot com. And Randy. If there's something you missed from earlier in the week, let's say the debate previewer or analysis after the debate, you can easily find that.
Just search for The John Phillips Show. Wherever you get your podcasts, whether it's the Apple podcast app, Iheartspotify, search for the John Phillip Show, hit subscribe you get download all the episodes you get. Do a Google on the YouTube. Get the free KABC app, the free KSFO app. Get that KMJ now app because we're on that station Saturdays
at noon. Listen to yesterday's show where John talked to Steve Hilton and we found out what exactly he was talking to Katie Porter about during the commercial break.
Well, it's not just statewide where labor is looking to go after California business leaders. They're looking to do so in the City by the Bay as well.
In San Francisco. There is going to be a measure on the ballot to increase the overpaid CEO tags, which is a gross receipts tax, which if passed, will increase the cost of pretty much everything formar. Here's ABC seven in the Bay. All right, now, do your voice your vote in the upcoming elections. We're talking about San Francisco's proposed CEO.
Tax ABY to seven nine.
Winness News political reporter Monica Madden is here now with a look at prop D.
Alcock Kristen Larry.
If you haven't been following this yet, Proposition DEEP would increase in existing San Francisco business tax tied to executive pay. It would apply to companies whose CEOs make at least one hundred times more than the median salary of their workers.
But a new report, and I.
Don't think any of those CEOs are going to let that go to ninety nine just to avoid the tax.
But a new report out today is sharpening the debate over a central question, who would actually pay? A new study is adding fuel to the fight over Proposition D, a measure that would increase San Francisco's existing overpaid executive tax.
Propt tax doesn't actually tax eeos. What it does is taxes transactions.
The tax would apply, so it's called the Overpaid CEO Act, But it does not tax the CEO. It taxes the receipts of a business who will pass that cost on to you almost immediately.
I love the title of this initiative too. It's like they're just out of the gate with just objective terminology.
The tax would apply to companies with large pay gaps between their executives and workers.
So we're going to see arise in grocery prices, arise in pharmacy prices, home goods prices, clothing prices. All of that is going to affect regular San Franciscos.
And the new analysis estimates low margin businesses like grocery stores could see profits drop by about a quarter grow SF, which is a post.
Wait, is the head of Kroger making one hundred times what the bag boys making? Actually, he probably.
Is well and then he doesn't even have to get carpal tunnel.
The Posed Property Commission the study.
We believe in a well functioning government, and that means it needs to have a budget to operate, So we don't want to get rid of all the taxes. We support everyone paying.
Their fair sure.
Economic experts say it would that's a term, by the way, that I'd like to have go away. I'm so sick of anybody saying the phrase pay their fare.
Share, Yeah, because that's another subjective term.
Economic experts say it would function almost like a sales tax.
I looked at my taxes this year. I don't make that much, and I feel like I was more than fair.
Oh. I looked at my taxes after everything that I've already paid, and then they wanted more from me. I turned into a complete rage of haul. I was like Donald Duck with pans.
Economic experts say it would function almost like a sales tax.
What is a grocery seats tax. It's basically a tax on the sales revenues that the company gets in the city.
And might not have its intended effect.
It might cause them to raise the prices they charged in San Francisco in terms of cutting their CEO's pay, raising the uh, you know, wages of their workers. I think that's not really very likely.
But support so if the intent of this is to raise wages so they don't have that differential, that's not happening.
But supporters say that frame miss is the bigger picture.
It is really targeted just at the biggest corporations in the city, and it would raise about three hundred million dollars two hundred and fifty to three hundred million dollars in revenue. It's enough to at least stop some of the most devastating cuts to services SAT And.
How many businesses are you going to chase the San Jose with this one.
We're not going to have any rich people left, which means we're not going to have any employers left. Remember the old congressman from Ohio, Jim Trafficant, who had the hair that looked like it was cut by a weed whacker. He'd always give those speeches on the house floor. Beam me up, Scottie. He always said it was the son of a truck driver, but he would remind people his truck driver father never worked for a poor man. And I think that labor in California needs to remember that.
Eight hundred two two two five two two two is the telephone number one eight hundred two two two five two two two. If you'd like to email the show, you can do so at Johnny Don't Like Show at gmail dot com. That's Johnny Don't Like Show at gmail dot com. As Randy said earlier in the program. We are now entering a phase where it's not just men and women and I guess sixteen year olds who can get cited by the CHP and law enforcement for traffic infractions, now the robots can too.
The DMV is authorized ticket finding when weamos break the law. What does this even mean? Let's find out here is kpix in the Bay.
California is putting a new rule in place to make sure robotaxis are not above the law.
So it comes at time how many violations have the weimos had, because I'm going to guess not that many. Do you know how patient the weimo is. I was taking once in San Francisco and we were going around Chinatown and there was a person on a bicycle on a very narrow street who was going so slow, and the Waimo doesn't honk at him. The Weimo doesn't try to go around him. The Weimo just sits there and is patient. And I need to distract myself by staring at my phone so I don't get angry.
Well, we don't want to make the robots more aggressive because then they'll eventually kill us all.
So it comes after incidents like this. Well, back in September, San Bruno police officer pulled over a Weimo that made an illegal U turn, but without a human in the car.
You know, the way the weymos work is they've been studying driver data for years and years and years before they put them on the roads. So I'm going to guess the AI learned that everybody does that illegal U turn in San Bruno.
Maybe the robot was studying me, but.
Without a human in the car, he had no one to ticket.
Now that's changing. The DMB is getting police the green light to issue tickets to driverless cars. Kenny Joy breaks down the new rules.
For years, the big question when it comes to driverless cars is what happens when they break the law. The DMV has implemented new rules, but the overall impact is still unclear. Driverless cars like Waimo robotaxis can now be ticketed just like any other car on the road. New DMV rules give law enforcement the green.
Did they also ask the robot a whole bunch of questions like so what are you doing out tonight?
Or maybe they send the robots to comedy traffic school.
New DMV rules give law enforcement the green light to cite av companies for moving violations. Companies like Waimo will also be forced to respond to calls from police and fire within thirty seconds. Ahmed Binaffa is an engineering professor at San Jose State.
There would be some kind of you know, no punishment penalties for that, and that's going to force them to do it better, because this is the only way that can force a company to do better if that's going to reflect in their reputation with their customers.
The changes come after high profile issues, including hundreds of waymos stalling and blocking intersections during a San Francisco blackout last December.
Yeah, but here's the thing about that blackout, and yes, that was the PG and E blackout, and one issue was you had a few dozen waymos that were completely stopped in the road. And that is actually because of a California regulation that says in order for the weimo to operate, they need to be connected to the internet
one hundred percent of the time. So if there's a PG and E blackout and then the internet goes out for the entire city, because of the regulation that there is the technology already where the weamo could pull over safely with the autonomous technology, but because it has to be connected to the internet one hundred percent of the time. If the Internet goes down, the Waimo's just gonna sit there.
And then if you're behind the waimo, so do you?
Blocking intersections during a San Francisco blackout last December. The San Francisco Fire Department has repeatedly complained about driverless cars entering emergency zones and impacting responses. AV companies can face penalties if their cars drive through these zones. The Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association, which represents waymo's industry interests, you.
Would be really great if their spokesperson was a robot.
It could be robot Barbara Ferrara for all we know. I mean she deals with the public all the time, holding press conferences in those white lab coats.
I don't like wearing a mask.
I find it annoying.
Did not specifically address the ticketing rules, but commended the new DMV regulations as a whole, saying, in part, autonomous vehicle innovators operating in California have a clear, workable path to test and deploy, ensuring the state will continue to benefit from autonomous technology. Through safer roads, enhance accessibility and strength and supply chains. State Senator Dave Cortesis called autonomous vehicles unfinished technology.
Okay, something you need to know about Dave Cortesi. This is the biggest champion of high speed rail and seems to always have a b in his bonnet about weaimos.
Oh yeah, as if the high speed rail is working like a Swiss clock.
State Senator Dave Cortesius.
I wonder, by the way, I would just love to look this up. Dave Cortesi, who has always outspoken anytime there's a story about weimos he wants to regulate them. How much money is he getting from lyftin Uber?
State?
Well, doesn't Uber own Waimo now or they have some kind of deal with them?
No, no, no, no, no, they're they're working on their own technology. Weimo is owned by Google.
State Senator Dave Cortesis called autonomous view and.
The robotaxis that elon Proma is ten years ago, they're still not operational.
State Senator Dave Cortesius called autonomous vehicles unfinished technology and has introduced the legislation SB twelve forty six calling for more oversight, including ending the practice of one person in a control room monitoring more than three vehicles.
So wait, you want to have one person who, when needed, which is rare, can operate every individual vehicle, because then WAIMO is going to be incredibly expensive to operate.
No, that's what they're trying to do, though they're trying to regulate it out of existence.
Right now, the car drives itself, and if there's some kind of situation where the car cannot figure out what's going on, like when it gets stuck at that intersection in Culver City, somebody in a command center with a whole bunch of way moos can control it. He doesn't need to be responsible for just one car. That's not feasible.
Okay.
So if you don't have a driver in the car, where is then there is human Okay, it's a remote operator, all right, Well, we want those remote operators to be at the right ratio. We want them to understand California law. It's just like we'd want a human driver.
Don This is like the same nonsense where they try to create laws in order to crack down on shoplifting at supermarkets. They need one employee for every two self checkout stands, which of course is a push by the grocers' unions.
Oh yeah, because they want more jobs and more union dues coming in. It has nothing to do with what's efficient or what's better for the consumer.
A human driver under stain California laws.
Fortesi believes the new job most human drivers don't understand California laws. Have you seen the way people drive?
And here's what I'd like to know. How does he come down on giving trucker's licenses to people who don't speak English.
Fortessi believes the new DMV rules won't dramatically change the way companies like Waymo operate in the short run, but Banafa believes more legislation and oversight rules will eventually give the public more safety data and lead to other chain changes within the industry.
And that's will really Waimo's safety track record is so much higher than us awful human drivers, and.
That's it's not even comparable.
And that's will really identify them how safe they are, and that's going to build some kind of a trust by saying, okay, you know, in how many how many incidents this car or this company face so far, so they would be forced to change the hardware and the software to you know, to to interact with the with the with the police.
The DMV says the new regulations.
Are they going to train the weimo to come up with excuses that the cops might buy into, like, Yeah, I was just running late and I blew past that stops and I'm sorry I got out of a ticket one time, just being completely honest about.
That the way MO tells the cop. No, I swear I only had two glasses of wine with dinner.
The DMV says the new regulations are the most comprehensive in the country.
Here are some of the other new rules from the DMV. Car companies can now apply for permits to test and use heavy duty autonomous vehicles like big rigs.
Yeah, the robo trucks are on their way, and you know who hates that, Loraina Gonzalez. She tweeted out, unacceptable. We cannot allow robo trucks, even though we are right now in a state where it is so hard to hire truck drivers and we don't want to lower the standards. And when you have fewer truck drivers on the roads, you're going to have to increase the cost for everybody.
Well, and She's another one who wants illegal alien truck drivers who can't read the signs to be able to drive lawfully in California.
Here are some of the other new rules from the DMV. Car companies can now apply for permits to test and use heavy duty autonomous vehicles like big rigs. Robo taxi companies also need to have plans to allow first responders to manually override their car, and cities can now create geil fences in emergencies. These fences would keep the robotaxis out of certain areas.
So there you go. Those are all the newest regulations coming to waymos, including being able to ticket them when they rarely break our traffic laws.
If you'd like to email the show, you can do so at Johnny Don't like show at gmail dot com. That's Johnny. Don't like show at gmail dot com. Well fresh offer, black market rape hotline. Our girl, Pammy Price is back in the news absolutely.
Pamela Price participated in a forum where she's trying to get her old job back.
She called me a crime boss.
Pamela Price was the district attorney for Alameda County until she was recalled overwhelmingly by her constituents fear, Fear, doom and gloom see then decided to start a revenge podcast quite frankly, and then when that wasn't getting enough attention, she decided to run for reelection to get the job back that she was ousted from. She won't prosecute cases,
and what do you know? When she participated in the forum that included the current da Ursula Jones Dixon and another contender, some of the residents weren't too happy to see her.
I've been bipped several times.
For more you don't say here is kron four.
Callomenia County voter has had the chance to hear from three candidates for district Attorney. This evening, current da Ursula Jones Dixon recalled District Attorney Pamela Price.
That's her full name. Now recalled District Attorney Pamela Price.
That's quite an introduction.
Do you remember she said on a memo when she first started, where she wanted everyone to refer to her as Madame District Attorney.
I think Heidi Flies did the same thing.
And Gobel Krishnan participated in a forum in Oakland. Crawford's men and Harry was there and explains what those candidates had to say.
The three candidates all had a chance to answer questions from the moderators as well as people in the community. We spoke to some people who came to listen and said they're still on the fence and they wanted to hear from all the candidates before making a decision.
Well, they probably want to hear from Ursula, and they want to hear from Gopul. But I'm pretty sure the majority of people there they know what they're getting with Pamela Price, and they decided to get a refund.
Well, they've seen the end of that movie before.
In his back, an incumbent, a recalled district attorney hoping to reclaim her old job, and a newcomer all had the chance to address voters. Rose Pratt, nervous, was there early, eager to learn about each of the candidates and how they would address local issues with politics.
Knowing the way they are, we first must fight at home in our own grounds before we start going any where else.
Ursula Jones Dixon is the current DA. She was appointed by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors in January of twenty twenty five.
She's had that job for over a year now, and there have been almost no headlines about any crazy things going on at that office, because typically what goes on in a DA's office doesn't make the news if you just enforce the law.
With Pamela Price, the headlines were like machine gun fire, which was also heard on the streets of Oakland on a regular basis when she was DA.
She's too soft on crime, She says.
Her goal is to continue prioritizing victims.
A reason I llowed the best to do this job is because I think that victims' rights are important, and I felt like we lost sight of them over the last several years. So you're telling me Ursula Jones Dixon doesn't take a crime victim like Brenda Grisham and just hang up on her when she calls.
As a result of.
Them, I am building an office that absolutely focuses on the controls.
Many community members were meeting candidate Gopal Christian for the first time, an immigrant from India who says he wants to protect everyone, but highlighted other immigrants and marginalized communities.
Oh, I'm gonna be DA on the organized clime. I'm gonna be DA on the ice.
There would be no ice in Alameda County. I think they'll be there.
Yeah, there's a thing called federal supremacy. Bud better go back to law school.
And the no hate clime goal unfunblished.
Pamela Price was overwhelmingly ousted as DA in twenty twenty four.
Oh, I love hearing that it was like sixty seven percent.
Pamila Price was overwhelmingly ousted as DA in twenty twenty four, but decided to run again. She says she still has the same goal.
I still believe in the core values that brought me to the District Attorney's office.
In fairness in.
Assistance, fairness meaning that the criminals are the real victims, which is something she said over and over and over again, including the bippers.
His back.
In fairness in assistem that treats everyone equally, and a clear commitment to public safety.
Christ did address to recall campains against charge the miss voters.
They told voters, I was responsible for all the crime in Oakland and all the business is closing.
Well, you definitely had a part in it. Oh yeah, some of it you could blame.
On Shanghy, absolutely absolutely.
But even when OPD made an arrest it was rare. Nothing would happen with that DA.
I've been bipped several times.
They told voters I was responsible for all the crime in Oakland and all the business is closed.
She went on to say she supports victims.
Well, if it was only Oakland, then how come everyone in Fremont recalled you too.
She went on to say she's pretty much.
Got nailed all over the county.
To the wall.
She went on to say she supports victims, but some of the crowd still pushed back on her approach.
The guy Sola got words somebody a year later because she whoa.
Vox popular guy Sola got words somebody a year later because she st.
The primary election for District Attorney is June second. The top two vote getters will then move on to the November election. Unless one of the candidates gets more than fifty percent of the vote, then there is no runoff in Oakland. Amanda Harry Crownford.
New So there you go the latest on the Alameda County DA's race. Pamela Price is still trying to get her old job back, but it doesn't look like the locals are going to take her up on that.
Nope, But she might be a perennial candidate who runs for office every single cycle.