Mapping the Epstein Mafia w/ Firas Modad: The J. Burden Show Ep. 435

a new tenancy begins. Find out more about the phased introduction of these changes at RTB dot I E from the Residential Tenancies Board.

out at you from these files. What did you pick up on?

going on. But what isn't disputable from the files is that Epstein was at the center of a ethnic network, predominantly Jewish network, that tried to profit wherever possible from any kind of geopolitical development that presented an opportunity to them, and the focus was on financial profit and figuring out how to buy and sell financial assets, with Epstein repeatedly saying that he isn't interested in real assets or anything

of that sort. He only makes money from finance. And you see that he says that he's the representative of the Rothschilds. Previously, if you spoke about any kind of Rothschild network you were written off as a crazy conspiracy theorist. See him talking to Peter Thiel and saying, as you know, I represent the Rothschilds. I need your help in modernizing their banking practice and things of that nature. You see the CEO of the Edmond Rothschild group emailing him and

saying that she wants his help. She misses him, Da da da, But also he's suggesting senior staff to her and helping her hire bankers and things of that nature. You see email exchanges about how to profit from the

Ukraine War and the kind of opportunities there. You see Epstein making having a connection with Larry Summers and Larry Summers advising the Ukrainian government before the war began and helping them with their debt and things of that nature, and you see them also coordinating on what should happen inside Ukraine. You basically see this network that's involved in huge geopolitical developments and figuring out how to make money

on these developments and how to profit from them. And it extends across a huge range of politicians and it isn't local to any particular place in the world. You see connections to India, you see connections to the Middle East, you see connections to Central Asia, to Mongolia, Angola, all kinds of weird places with one focus, which is how

to make money. And it works in a way as a Ebsteine ends up acting as a clearinghouse for information and acts as a facilitator between different networks that each have their own oligarchic network. So essentially it's a look into the nature of the governing oligarchy that acts under

the cover of democracy. But when somebody like Macron, who used to be a rothschild banker himself, is identified as having very high ambitions and wanting to make all kinds of changes, what happens is that Macro is put in touch with the CEO of the World Economic Forum and the big Plan on how to bypass the United Nations with the World Economic Forum is sort of laid bare in the documents that the WF actually produces, and so you see this very weird moment where the crazy conspiracy

theorists are kind of proven right because it is all there in black and white, and it's all documented. And that's the main value of the Epstein files. It's an insight into how this network operates, and it's an insight into the way that the rest of the world thinks about the United States and how to gain influence in

the United States. So when the Indians want to improve their relationship with Trump, they send Anniel Ambani, who is an Indian billionaire acting as a representative of the Indian leadership. He gets in touch with Epstein. Epstein gives them all kinds of advice on working with Israel. Modi goes to Israel and dances with Natanyahu and that ends up improving the fortunes of India in its relations with the United States.

And you can ask yourself if that's related to h one B's or you can ask yourself if that's related to the acceptance of Indian students into American universities. So it's this kind of oligarchic dynamic that again acts under the cover of democracy that's mainly revealed by the files. That's the key takeaway that there's a big club and

it consists of billionaires and you're not in it. And then you add to that people like Jared Kushner, whose family is best friends or close friends with the with Dataniaho, the Prime Minister of Israel, and he's operating in the White House, and he's got control of the US's negotiations now with Iran and with Russia and with Hamas and with all kinds of other issues, and you could see that, Okay, this actually connects together, and what you have is a

kind of ethnic oligarchy or ethnic network linked to different oligarch different oligarchic networks. That's kind of running the show. And you can't separate that from the leaks of emails by Larry Allis where he has vetted Marco Rubio for his loyalty to Israel and decided to invest in Marco Rubio. Well, Marco Rubio is now in charge of the NSA, he's in charge of the sorry, the National Security Council NSC,

He's in charge of the State Department. He's one of the key decision makers and he's a very strong potential successor to Trump. And you can't separate it from JD Vance, who was, you know, initially working with David Frum, the neo conservative David from and then ended up getting funded by Peter Tiel, who's also repeatedly in those files. So it's it's a big club and you're just not a part of it. And that's actually how decisions are made, not based on what voters want are or what the

public wants or anything, you know, bothersome like that. It's big money deciding.

of Guinness or not.

to you in your high school Civics class. One of the things that I want to go back to that you brought up that I think is particularly interesting is the interaction between Epstein and Teal, because, as you've said, you know, if you would have told me you know that you believed that the Rothschilds were an integral part of this two years ago, just as a round number, I would have said, you're probably crazy, right, That's that's sort of the kind of classic tinfoil hat stuff. So

I admit, you know what I was wrong there. I think many people were. But you see this sort of maximal version of Epstein, that this is sort of the one world network. Everything runs through this. And this is not a defensive Peter Tiel, far from it. But when I look at those emails, I see something very different than how Epstein is talking to his guys, the guys in his network, they're much more professional. He has actually

bothered to spell words correctly. And to me, I see that, and I see two networks talking to each other.

his own words. Somebody like Teal is at the head of his own network, which he cultivated over the years and built up over the years, and Vance is part of the Teal network. Somebody like Larry Ellison, who also features in those emails, he's again his own man. Somebody like Larry Fink, whose son's ex girlfriend I believe is kind of providing Epstein with blackmail material on her relationship with Fink Junior and how she was pressured into an abortion.

So you see these dynamics where it's these guys interacting with each other and these networks interacting with each other. That actually defines the political discourse. It's not that they are that there is one network and one conspiracy. It's that what happens is that there's a bunch of networks. They are the real decision makers. Democracy acts as a cover for them, and they get what they want through donations. Now I'm going to pause for a second and then

I'll get back to the Iran War. Now, when it comes to the Iran War, you also need to put that in context and what Marco Rubio actually said. There's been two theories on the Iran War. One which is what Tucker Carlson has said in the past, which is that the Israelis have threatened to use nuclear weapons if

they don't have their way if the Americans don't play ball. Essentially, the second is what Rubio said, which is that the Israelis were going to launch a war on their own and there for the Americans who are going to be targeted, and therefore it was wise for the US to participate

in that attack. If you look at this in some more thought, what you understand is that it's the Americans who are providing the Israelis with the terminal high altitude air defense systems, the FAD systems, which are absolutely necessary for Israel to intercept Iranian hypersonic missiles because the Patriots don't work, and ARTO three kind of does, kind of doesn't, and pretty much all Israeli technology or is American funded,

especially the interception technology. It's the Americans who are providing Israel with the bombs and with the aircraft and with pretty much every bit of capability that they need. So during the Gaza War or the Gaza and Lebanon War after seven October, they got endless shipments of artillery shells from the United States, to the extent that this created a shortage in Ukraine because the Ukrainians also needed those shells. And we can talk about the Zelenski Summer's Epstein connections.

You see that the Israelis get four billion dollars every year from the United States, and when there's a big war like the one that started on seven October, you see that that figure becomes tens of billions of dollars.

You would assume that a country of the size of Israel, which is dependent on the United States financially, which is dependent on the United States economically and politically, because it's the US that vetos UN resolutions, it's the US that stops the UN from acting gainst Israel, et cetera, et cetera, you would assume that that country would be a dependency and that if the Israelis said to American decision makers, we are going to go to war on our own,

the answer would be pound sand and we're going to use nuclear weapons. The answer would be while you will

face the consequences of using nuclear weapons. So the only reason that American decision makers would conclude that if the Israeli said they were going to war, they have no choice about to follow is because of the existence of networks like Epstein's, like Allison's, and obviously, as natanieljo himself said the biggest technology move in the last year was the acquisition of TikTok by Larry Allison, and then he consolidated over a big chunk of media, and that from

that cascades all kinds of Hollywood studios that operate under him. And then you have the Murdoch Network, which controls Fox News and the information that pretty much all American Republicans receive. You get this intersection of media, blackmail, lobbying, power, apac financing, all of them working together to achieve the objectives of one state. And you see that with the Epstein connections

to Ehudbadakh. We have reports essentially from the Epstein files saying that it was these rabies who planted the security equipment and the surveyance equipment in Epstein's mansion in New York, meaning that they have access to the alleged blackmail material that Epstein would have had. And we have it on record that there were enormous drives and files that were in the Epstein mansion that disappeared after the FBI initial rate. And so you ask yourself, well, okay, how is this

actually working? What is going on here? And what's going on is that these networks of oligarchs are pushing the United States, and behind the United States, the entire West in one direction. And then you have a media arm like ADL which will tell you that if you don't support transgenderism, then your evil Well, who's one of the biggest backers of transgenderism. It's the Pritzkers. Guess what one

of the Pritzkers features in the Epstein files. So you end up with an impression that these networks are pushing certain things on the world, including the war in Idan, including transgenderism, including immigration, including the whole BLM anti racism bs and they stand to benefit from it financially, but they also to kind of benefit from it socially because if you have a very Christian ethnically cohesive nation, unfortunately

but very naturally, it will exclude certain ethnic groups. And then you see what diversity is our strength really means, and who the hour is in that slogan. And so you end up thinking, maybe I'm losing my mind because

all of this sounds too conspiratorial. But you look at campaign donations, you look at Donald Trump saying to the Israelik Nesset that it was because of Sheldon Adelson's money that he recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and moved the embassy, and he recognized the Golan Heights as Israeli territory, And you kind of go, well, you're actually telling me how this works. You look at him saying well,

in days past. You look at Trump saying, well, in day's past, nobody would have dared challenge Israel and they had the strongest lobby and it's not like that anymore, and that's a problem. And you kind of go, well, I thought your whole thing was America first. So it just casts things in a very different light, and it highlights the existence of a conflict that since the World War Two narratives were spun up, has been hidden and we've all had to pretend that it doesn't exist. But

you kind of now think that it's actually real. And this isn't something that I want to believe, or this isn't something that I'm happy about, but I am first and foremost an analyst and have to look at the evidence that's in front of me, and the evidence from who runs Fox News to who runs CBS, to how our narrative is being spun to who's APAC donating money to to how this network is profiting from the Ukraine War or even profiting from Libya, for God's sake, and

you kind of go, well, Okay, maybe what I've been trained to believe is not true is in fact true. And this is not a conclusion that I'm happy with. And I don't want to say, oh, this whole group is bad or anything of that sort, but I do want to point out that there is an oligarchy that acts with a sense of ethnic solidarity, and that acts in the interest of a certain country. And you're not

allowed to say it or notice it. But it's because you're not allowed to say it or notice it that it is important to notice it and to say it well.

there are certain political figures acting beyond shamelessly right. Obviously you have Mark Levin, But I saw a post from Randy Fine, allegedly a representative of the state of Florida, which is not a part of Israel, where he had taken Comane's name scratched off, you know, the first couple letters, and again at the end so that it said Hayman, and he basically said, you know, yet again, you know, we have have saved ourselves, saved our people from a

you know, an evil Persian leader who uh, you know, sought to kill us several things. There won an interesting use of the term us again as in an American political leader. But also if we're talking about, you know, the these terms that are weaponized tactically throughout my entire life.

And even before that, I was reliably informed that we needed to have a separation of a church and state, that using the religious principles of the people who founded the nation that I live in was illegitimate, was unfair, and yet many of these same people are more than willing to invoke three thousand year old religious history to push my entire nation into a war. Right that religion does not need to be separated from our state. It

is to be honest, completely and totally infuriating. So I'm curious, fears, and this is slightly outside the scope of what I prepared you for, but nonetheless I'm curious to get your thoughts on it. Tucker Carlson's special on the Iran War, which came out yesterday, was quite interesting, and he raised a point where he said, just because you speaking to Israeli government and Benjamin et Yahoo want something, doesn't mean

that it's actually good for you. And one of the things I've been really confused about is seemingly decapitating the Iranian regime blowing up four hundred other people right around

the Malas. It seems as if that would massively empower the IRGC, who seemingly would be a much more competent enemy to fight a more nationalist, more militarized government, more dispersed certainly as well then, and I don't mean to be rude here, but effectively, a aging sort of eighty year old Muslim pope speaking inexactly, But how does that actually help Israel because it seems as if they are transferring power from admittedly someone they don't like for perhaps

irrational religious reasons, to a more capable, competent sort of I guess you could call it a military junta.

the narratives, are not overwhelmingly atheist or whatever. There is a decent chunk call it thirty percent, forty percent, twenty percent, we don't have exact surveys here, who are loyal to their government, and you see relatively high participation rates in Iranian elections, usually in the sixty sometimes seventy percent range participation in elections, meaning that a chunk of the public does believe that their system is legitimate enough for them

to participate it. However, a look at Iran's location will tell you that they're surrounded by Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey, which are three Sudney powers that are hostile to the Iranian Shia. Therefore, a more nationalist government might be more pragmatic in that it would see Israel in the same way that the Shahs Israel. The Shah work quite closely with the Israelis and is on record talking about the extent of the power of the Jewish lobby in the

United States. And he saw that his interests aligned with Israel's because it meant that the Sudney Arabs would be contained as a result. And so a militaristic Iran is a more natural ally for the Israelis, and that is one objective of this war, and it's a more natural ally of the UN States, because the United States would want Iran to be strong in the middle of these Sudney powers in order to help contain them and constrain their freedom of action. So that's the logic for one

need to get rid of the Iranian leadership. On the other hand, because of the defeat of Hezbalah in Lebamon, and because of the damage inflicted on Iran in the Twelve Day War, and because Ramenei was eighty seven years old when he died, this transition to nationalism was probably going to happen anyway. So this war was not really necessary. In five years time, the natural evolution of Iran would have led them to conclude the Turkey is the rising

power in the Middle East. Turkey is a big problem for them in Iraq because Turkey is trying to take over Iraq, just as it has taken over Syria. Obviously, the Turks will have ambitions on parts of Lebanon, especially the northern part that is predominantly sunny, and so the Iranians would have evolved in this direction anyway if left to their own devices. But the Israelis are not patient, and they see the threat from Turkey, and therefore they're

trying to accelerate Iran's transition. So this is some of the logic there. And the only reason that the Israelis could act in this way is because of the extent of influence that their networks have over American policy makers through blackmail by people like green Blat and Epstein, green Blat being more focused on commercial blackmail, Epstein on the more sordid kind through media through the rest of the oligarchy. And so that's the picture there that you have to

think about. And if the Iranian regime falls apart as a result of this war and the IERGC does not end up in control of Era, and subsequently then you see the Turks expanding into northern Iraq and taking the oil reserves that sit there and using that to solve the biggest problem in the Turkish economy, which is their reliance on oil imports and on energy imports. In general. Northern Iraq has a huge amount of oil, a lot

of it is not developed. Syria is an oil producer, but a minuscule one, largely because ninety something percent of their territory is not explored for oil, and so the Turks are set to receive this economic bonanza, which makes them an even bigger problem. The issue here is that if the Iran war is successful, the Israelis can then steer you towards a war with Turkey at a time when Europe has been flooded with migrants and where you have.

Scorpion prison forever. And so essentially, the Turks have an army inside Europe, and these Raelis are already saying that Turkey is the next big threat and needs to be dealt with because the fundamental problem with Israel is that it needs its neighbors to be unstable, weak, and fragmented. This is why the Iraq War happened to break Iraq completely, to fundamentally destroy it, because it had become a significant

military power. This is why Egypt is kept on such a tight leash, because it is possible for Egypt to become a threat to Israel. So you see the result of Israeli policy is to create total chaos in the Middle East. And the people who are paying for the chaos are predominantly the Europeans, and the people who are enabling this policy are the Americans. And you see how that enablement is done through the Epstein files and through the records of who's making donations to which politicians.

the reason. As an elite theorist, I think that that is entirely backwards, because these are predominantly, let's be honest, poor states in the American South. The idea that these states control the government is completely and totally absurd. But if you go into books like the incredible Scofield and his book, I think that's what it's called. What you find out is that this Christian Zionism, which you see even in figures like Mike Pompeo or Mike Huckabee, was artificial.

You have the LACUD party giving out millions of dollars, giving out private jets, giving preferential access to religious figures that would playball right, boosting them to create a astro turfed public support for the allegedly secular nation of Israel.

And okay, sure that does not mean those people, the parishioners on the ground control the government, right, But it is yet another element, and if you want to go into it, it is likely motivated by the exact same things we see in the Epstein files, although I can't entirely prove that, so that's pure conjecture. Look, this is not a new thing, right, this has been decades in the making. And to your point about who bears the costs,

certainly Western Europe does. The neo conservatives, the Zionists seem to for some reason I can't quite figure out why really really hate Western Europe and are more than willing for both America and Europe to bear the consequences. One of the things that is still murky, we're not entirely sure, is that almost immediately after the war and Iran kicked off,

there were two very devastating terror attacks in America. One of them was done by admittedly a West African fellow, but someone who was wearing a sweatshirt that said the property of Allah, which is still.

nationalist direction. I mean, look like, I don't know what the life expect to see of an eighty seven year old man in Iran is, but I'm guessing it is not to live to be much past eighty seven, is. It's incredibly infuriating, especially when the messaging you're getting is

that you are some sort of trader. You're not patriotic if you object to this interaction, especially because many on the conservative right in America were rightly ringing the alarm bells about the situation Ukraine, where similarly we were supposed to bankroll some foreign adventure. So you mentioned that there were connections between Epstein and Ukraine. I'm curious if you could go into.

you know, fair enough. But Larry Summers is a key part of the Epstein network, Like he's there all the time with Epstein, and it doesn't sound good at all.

fraud and fined by the United States. And he was one of the main beneficiaries of the dissolution of the Soviet Union where basically this huge bunch of oligarchs looted pretty much every industrial asset in the former Soviet Union

and to control over it and became the oligarchs. And he also owned a television station, and on that television station he had a show called Servant of the People about a teacher who becomes the president of the Ukraine somehow and fixes their relationship with Russia and does all

kinds of wonderful things. The star of that show was one of Vladimir Zelenski and used that show as a springboard to actually become president, promising to fix the corruption and to deal with the oligarchs and to deal with the problem with Russia. And yireya. You had Russia today

publishing articles saying is Zelenski genuine about peace? Because they thought, hey, maybe we can reach an accommodation with this man, even though his patron, Kolomoyski, in his capacity as governor of one of the regions of Ukraine, one of the Oblasts forget I forget which one was literally funding the as of battalion who were Neo Nazis. And if you tell people there was a Jewish oligarch funding a neo Nazi battalion against Russia, you sound insane, but it is true.

And you just have to sort of let that level of cynicism wash over you, over you and accept it. So Zelenski becomes president, having promised peace, and then ends up ordering a campaign to clear out the dawnbas the part of Ukraine that is predominantly Russian. I mean, there are other parts of Ukraine that are predominantly Russian. And I think Zelenski himself is a native Russian speaker, not Ukrainian speaker, but anyway, and so this guy who comes

out of nowhere is meeting with the Epstein network. And right after the twenty fourteen initial Russian invasion and the capture of Crimea and the consolidation over Doneska and Luhansk or parts of Duneska and Luhansk. You see Epstein emailing ian A Rothschild talking to her about the massive opportunities that exist in Ukraine and you kind of go, well, hold on a second, how are you connected to Zelenski?

And I understand that everybody wants to trade when big geopolitical events happen, but what private information do you end up getting that allows you to do that? And then you see him interacting with the EPSTEIN, the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development and talking to them about agribusinesses in Ukraine that he could benefit from and relaying that message to other parts of the network. Basically, this is

a good investment. Get into it. And to put that in context, it was the source andngos that led the Maidan uprising, and it was the Neo Nazis funded by Kolamoyski that were responsible for the shootings in the Maidan uprising. And you get Epstein talking to Rothschild about profiting from

the escalation. But now you also get Larry Fink's Blackrock figuring out how, in partnership with Donald Trump, they can basically asset strip Ukraine to make it pay for its debts and pay for the war each of these is a separate network, like the Sordus network is separate from the Epstein network, is separate from the Larry Fink network. But you see them acting not visibly in concerts because

we can't prove that, but essentially practically in concerts. And who's losing American taxpayers, European taxpayers, Ukrainians who are getting drafted, Russians who are being sent to the front line. I mean, it's.

removing the death penalty for treason. Well, I won't speculate as to why he did that, but I'm curious, could you dig into you know, Mandelssohn and you know his shall we say, alleged financial misconduct.

both Jewish. Now though basically Mandelssohn's rise was largely engineered, and a big part of his rise was that early on in the Labor Party he gained control of something I think called Promise, which was essentially a database of all of the black mailable material on the Labor Party, and he used that in partnership with Tony Blair, the future Prime Minister of Britain, in nineteen ninety seven until two thousand and nine or ten, I believe two thousand

and nine, I believe, to re engineer the Labor Party away from being a worker's party into being a big business party. That was a big part of Mandolsson's role, and for those years Peter Mandelson was essentially the number three in the British government. It was him and Alistair Campbell and Alistair Darling and Gordon Brown and Tony Blair, who were the leading figures in all of this. So this guy literally used a ton of blackmail material to

control the Labor Party. One of his heirs was a guy called Morgan McSweeney who ends up becoming the chief of staff to the current Prime Minister, who had lived on a Kipputz for six months in the nineties, who's a very talented man, very capable guy, but he was until recently in charge of running the actual Prime Minister

of Britain. During his time in office, Peter Mandelsson was basically leaking all kinds of state secrets with enormous financial implications to Jeffrey Epstein on everything from the British government planning to sell assets in order to fix his debt problem, to decisions about the bailous of the banking sector and things of that nature, in addition to having all kinds of perverted emails that were being kicked around between him

and Gilen Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. So a member of that network was the number three guy in the British government and was literally giving state secrets to Epstein and Epstein ended up giving a bunch of money to Peter Mandelson's quote unquote husband in order to help him set up I can some kind of alternative therapy thing that

that he was getting involved in. And him as well as Peter Madison, as well as George Osborne were also involved with a Russian Jewish oligarch called the der Prisca or de Prisca, and where on his yacht at a time whee when Peter Madison was meeting with of all people, say for Islam and Gaddaffi, the son of the late Libyan dictator Mohammed Gaddafi. So the number three man in

the British government was part of the Epstein network. And this didn't stop because the guy he groomed ended up managing Keir Starmer, who was currently the Prime Minister of Britain. And then you have to wonder who were who was somebody like George Osborne working with and what network was he part of. There's no evidence that he was involved in the same stuff. He was just on various billionaires yachts and holidaying with Mandelssohn and things like things like that.

But he's there and now with a reform party that is poised to take over as the next ruling party in Britain according to current polling. Their main economics guy is Robert Jenrick. Robert Jenerck is emailing Peter is emailing George Osborne to ask him whether or not Osborne approves

of his economic plans. These were the same like Osborne's economic plans were mainly austerity, meaning that the police was stripped bare and now you have a stabbing every day in random part of Britain that have never had these kinds of stabbings. The border force was weakened, every single state institution was weakened with budget cuts to sort of bring Britain to the brink of collapse in the name of serving the interests of the financial markets and making

sure that the financial markets approve. And it's these guys who were in charge under Blair, they were in charge under the Conservatives, they're in charge now under clear Starmer, and they're poised to be in charge in the future if Nigel fire Arsh becomes Prime Minister. And then you get the impression that what you have is a permanent state run by these financial networks working primarily for the approval of the financial markets and completely unaffected by elections.

look at Epstein's collection of presidential portraits. That's weird, right, he has you know, Bill Clinton in a dress and George W. Bush with a fighborhood lane and yeah, of course, just something you would do. But also, right, Obama's White House Council I can't remember her name, but she was heavily implicated.

It makes absolutely no difference because money talks. And the fundamental problem that you have is that you don't have a public aristocracy. In a public aristocracy where people know who you are and that you are actually a man of immense power and influence over the government. Being known is a way of holding you accountable, and you're held accountable based on your title and your status. What you

have now is a invisible migratory financial oligarchy. Gilenn Maxwell is supposedly British, but she's operating mainly in the United States as well as obviously in Britain. And it makes no difference which country has economic opportunities. It really makes no difference because these people stay rich and it is completely anonymous. Nobody wakes up and says, what did Larry

Ellison say on the news? But Larry Ellison probably has more power than I don't know Pete Hexath, but it's Pete Heexath with the title and the public profile, and Larry Ellison does his own thing quietly to his heart's content. So the nature of the relationship between the governing and the government is broken because a big part of it relies in a traditional monarchic system with an aristocracy on the people in power being public and known, at least

in their own regions. You have your own local feudal lord and you know who it is, and you know who the guy above him is, and you know who the king is, and you have as a result, recourse, and there is an expectation of the role of the nobility and what they should be doing, whereas in the system on the civil service side, all of the political appointees are transient, meaning that the civil service can do whatever the hell at once, meaning that what they will

prioritize is how to make money after they retire from the civil service. And on the oligarchic sid the oligarchy is largely invisible. Nobody is thinking about what Ronald Lauder is saying, nobody cares, but in reality, through his political donations,

he wields an insane amount of political influence. So the institutions are set up the wrong way because what they give is power to the oligarchy, but responsibility for the elected politicians who do not in fact end up with power because on the one side they're controlled by the donors and on the other side they are constrained by

the civil service. And that's why you end up with precisely the system where you feel that absolutely nobody is in charge, and you vote, and you vote and you vote and nothing changes.

for this war with Iran. We're accurately pointing out that this this sort of formal power does not exist domestically as regards the American judiciary, right, the president, the elected leader, the ostensible man in charge of the most powerful country in the world. It's actually not sovereign because some judge you've never heard of, who was born in Nigeria in

the middle of nowhere decides that is illegitimate. It cannot stand so fair enough, we understand that in one aspect, but on the foreign policy stage that is even more true, as perhaps inadvertently revealed by Marco Rubio again, who I don't particularly like, but I'll give them credit for saying that it's incredibly baffling, right, it's incredibly frustrating, And to watch that story get pulled into kind of this cheap partisan who was mentioned more? Oh well, Democrats were mentioned

three hundred and two times. We were only mentioned two hundred and eighty nine times. Is I mean, I want to say it's unexpected, but it is depressing, nonetheless so furious. I'm curious as we come up on time, is there anything you'd just like to say in conclusion?

you can't fix this except with individual integrity. You need to have people who are willing to speak up, who have courage and fortitude, who are able to say I'm not going to take their money, which was initially that Trump promise, if you'll remember, and who will say honestly, no, I am going to push things that I think are religiously right. I am going to push things that are Christian, and I am going to push things that are good for my nation because this is what my responsibility is.

These are the people who I owe something. And we live in this world where everybody's supposed to be an atomized individual, but this is fundamentally not real. You are not just an individual. You are part of your own network. Your network is your family and your church and your community.

And unless those are strengthened and genuinely become powerful, you are not going to be able to generate the people with the fortitude and the love of justice and the wisdom who can actually say no to financial influence and to intimidation. So if there is one thing that I

haven't discussed, it's the role of religion in this. And it's not about ethnic solidarity because we hate these people, or you know, we hate group X or dislike group Y. It's because the way policy is run is fundamentally immoral. But that is a natural consequence of society losing faith

and becoming immoral. So at the individual level, you have your own cross to bear, and part of that is having faith and behaving correctly so that you will end up with people leading you who behave in the same way, and it could be you being the leader.

he was a famous publisher. People sent him review copies all the time, and the the inciting incident was sort of a grammar exercise where students were asked to dissect, you know, a passage written about a waterfall and it used sort of flowery language, and the you know, the writers of the textbook were basically saying like, no, that's that's all nonsense, that's all horrible. You can't say that. That's not objective, and going off on that point, Lewis

says like, no, you need that. You need to instill into young people a belief in the transcendent, a belief in something more than what you can touch and what you can feel. And he expounds on that to say, like, look like that extended is the thing that motivates people to run into a burning building to save a child, because objectively, there's there's no reason you should do that if it's not your child, right, it could harm your

ability to accomplish your biological goal. The kind of cold, hard rational point of view as a as an individual. And he has this great point where he's talking about the future and he says, well, if this, this system of belief goes on checks, you know, we will soon live in a world where, you know, where police do not respond to two crimes, where they care more about preserving themselves than they do about the lives of the innocent. You know, written in the fifties, it was quite far sighted.

of society was. And as that's gone away, the kind of innate corruption of humanity has flowered. Right, things that people have always done, you know, done nasty things, traded insider secrets. But if you've convinced a group of people that your life is all there is that your personal enrichment, the amount of you know, serotonin you can ingest in

your life, it's the only purpose of your existence. Well, it's no shock that we see this, this sort of behavior, and there's one more thing and then we can wrap it up. But doing a long series, which is atypical for me, on the occult and on these sort of you know, occult killings and these kind of occult rings, not for the purpose of being you know, salacious, not for the purpose of building a wide audience, but because and this has been justified by these Epstein files as well.

Very clearly these people believe in evil, right, they believe in some form of spirituality, and they're powerful, ostensibly serious people. If they do, why don't you to be perfectly blunt about it. Curious, I'm curious to get your thoughts.

and that rock is the Christian faith. With all of the faults of Christian leaders, with all of the faults of people around you, there is no answer to the problem of evil except by realizing that there is also a problem of good, that this good in life comes from God, and that you owe God something, You owe

God everything. When you see the world in its true beauty, and when you see human beings in their true potential and you understand how broken they are from the lack of faith, you realize that you need to love the people around you. And we all do it imperfectly, including myself. I mean, I don't for a second claim that I'm

a good person. But you have to see that good, and you have to try to see it in others, even nasty people like the ones that we are trying to speak about, And you have to seek that good within yourself so that you can do the right thing, because if you don't have a sense of good within yourself, then why shouldn't you be corrupted? Why shouldn't you accept the offer of, you know, being with the fancy people and doing the nasty things that they do and enjoying

life the way they do, but selling your soul. So it's about us finding our own commitment to the divine. It's about us being genuine in our choice of faith, and it's about us realizing that faith is a covenant and a choice. You have to do your part. Abraham is asked to do all kinds of insanely difficult things, and what he receives for it is that his seed down the line will become a great nation. But his own life one challenge after the other, one misery after

the other, one sacrifice after the other. So we have to be we have to be open to good if we're going to combat evil. And it's not enough just to rail against it. You have to fix yourself as well. And if you don't try to fix yourself, it isn't going to happen. It just isn't going to happen. So start with yourself. Carry your own cross first. See the beam in your own eye, and if we all do that,

we get a Christian hydrust society. But a high trust society can be broken by one individual breaking behaving badly. That's a breach of trust. And so if you want to recover this hy trust society where you're not governed by a rotten, immoral, degenerate, lustful oligarchy, you have to start with yourself.

check out our sponsor ax Remote Fitness Coaching. If you guys can probably tell, I've been sick for the last week, which means I've not been able to use JD's services, but I highly recommend it. He's another small businessman who could use your support. Fiaris, it's been educational. I appreciate it, and everyone at home keep your head off. Good night.