Survival Modi: Indian PM’s fortunes revive

This episode is brought to you by Capital One. Capital One's tech team isn't just talking about multi agentic AI. They already deployed one. It's called Chat Concierge and it's simplifying car shopping, using self-reflection and layered reasoning with live API checks.

It doesn't just help buyers find a car they love. It helps schedule a test drive, get pre-approved for financing, and estimate trade-in value. Advanced, intuitive, and deployed. That's how they stack. That's technology at Capital One. Have you been waiting for the perfect time to upgrade your tech?

Good news, the wait is over. Dell Tech Day's annual sales event is here, and we're celebrating our best customers with fantastic deals on the latest PCs, like the Dell 14 Plus with Intel Core Ultra Processors. We've also got incredible perks like Dell Rewards, fast free shipping, premium support, price match guarantee, and more. And while you're upgrading your PC, you may as well go all out, because we're also offering huge deals on our premium suite of monitors and accessories.

You know what that means? That's right. You can get a whole new setup with amazing savings. Clearly this is a sale you don't want to miss. Visit Dell.com slash deals. That's Dell.com slash deals. The Economist. Hello and welcome to the intelligence from The Economist. I'm Rosie Blore. And I'm Jason Palmer. Every weekday we provide a fresh perspective on the events shaping your world.

How to nurture your child's genius appears to be a preoccupation of at least some parents. Until now, the assumption was that after you push At birth, you just keep pushing, and you study begs to differ. And when the last two pandas on loan from China left Japan, there was a great outpouring of emotion. Pandemonium, you might call it. But this is the arithmetic of panda diplomacy, ever fewer as Sino-Japanese relations have become more tense. First up though.

Franks. आज हार अपने When the EU and India recently announced a long-awaited free trade deal, India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi called it his country's largest ever. The European Commission's President Ursula von der Leyen reached Trumpian levels of bombast. We did it. We delivered the mother-of-all deals. We are creating a market of two billion people. This was a big win for Mr. Modi, and one that reflects just how much he's back at the top of Indian politics.

Narendra Modi took office in the era of Barack Obama, David Cameron, and Angela Merkel, and now he's expected to run again in the next Indian national election in 2029, aged seventeen. And he's actually got his eye on being the longest serving Indian Prime Minister of all time.

Tom Sass is our South Asia bureau chief. If you wind back just to 2024, things looked really a bit different. Modi lost his majority in the national election then, and many thought his dominance of Indian politics was coming to an end. But it's clearly not. What has changed in that year and a half? So after that disappointing 2024 election result, a lot of people thought that.

peak Modi had been reached, that his powers over the Indian voter were on the way. And there was even some talk in India about succession. And now all of that looks a bit premature and Modi is actually as dominant as he's ever been. And if you look at that election result. Actually the BJP's vote share only fell by less than a percentage point. It was still by far the dominant party and Congress, the main opposition party, was a long way behind.

And what we've seen since then is the government respond to some of the things that voters were unhappy about at that election, particularly bringing inflation down, whereas the opposition hasn't really centered around a strong critique. So tell me some of the things that mister Modi's government has managed to do since that election. So it's been a busy time politically and Modi's coalition has won a string of state elections. And really the opposition in India is in disarray.

And since his latest victory in the state elections, that was in Bihar. He's been pushing through some much needed reforms at the central level. So he's been simplifying taxes, he's been overhauling India's pretty complex labour laws.

as well as striking trade deals. Just recently we've seen India sign a big trade deal with the EU and push more deregulation in a budget. Modi's government still pushes this pretty brash cultural agenda that's centered on restoring Indian and more specifically Hindu pride. But what we've seen is as he's come under more pressure from abroad, he's started to focus more on strengthening India's economy.

So something you alluded to there, the the brash cultural agenda, by which I I presume you mean mister Modi's Hindu nationalism, where does that feeling sit in this ride for him? So the nature of that Hindu nationalist agenda hasn't really changed. Modi and his colleagues still resort to pretty divisive, shrill language on the campaign trail.

But unlike in his second term, the government hasn't put lots of energy into big new initiatives that would stoke tension between India's different communities. There are, for example, fears of more plans to replace mosques.

Instead, he's been putting much more energy on the economic reform. And in this I think we can see a little bit of the hand of Donald Trump helping, because what Donald Trump's tariffs on India have done is convince certain people within Mr. Modi's movement that this kind of economic liberalisation that some of them might not have been so keen on is actually necessary to make India stronger in a more hostile world.

But having lost his majority he's had to do what he's done in coalition. How has that sort of changed the the character of how he's been governing? So his coalition has actually been surprisingly stable and what he's done is he's brought in two regional parties and they've been pretty happy to offer their loyalty in exchange for patronage. They've done pretty well. They've got lots of money for their regions. And in some areas they've actually curbed

some of the BJP's instincts. So for example, the BJP hasn't gone down the path of implementing a uniform civil code, which is a controversial idea to change India's family laws.

And actually in India now it's the opposition that looks more divided than the government. So many of the other parties that are opposed to the BJP at a regional level question the role of India's Congress Party and its leader, Rahul Gandhi, and they really ask whether he's the right person to lead the challenge to Narendra Modi. Taken together then, mister Modi's plan to desire to be India's longest serving leader, it's sort of on track.

I think it is. It's striking to me, Jason. I've just recently moved to India from the UK where some of our prime ministers don't even last fifty days. And with Narendra Modi, India's got a leader who's been in office almost twelve years actually, and still seventy percent of Indians approve of him. And if you go out on the street in Delhi, you'll hear people describe him as a saint. So he's got this incredible public image, almost like a personality cult.

Things could still go wrong for him. There's a lot of anger in the country about the lack of jobs still. His government could very easily get overconfident and complacent. And there's still an awful lot of things that need doing. But right now you definitely wouldn't bet against him. Tom, thanks very much for your time. Thanks, Jason. With no fees or minimums on the It's no wonder the Capital One Bank guy is so passionate about banking with Capital One.

If he were here, he wouldn't just tell you about no fees or minimums. He'd also talk about how most Capital One cafes are open seven. To assist with your banking needs. Even on weekends, it's pretty much all he talks about, in a good way. What's in your wallet? Terms apply. See CapitalOne.comslash bank. Capital One N A member F D I C.

Novak Djokovic took up tennis aged four when his ski coach dad gave him a mini racket and a ball. By the age of twelve, he'd moved to a tennis academy in Germany, and at twenty he won his first major title at the Australian Open. It was unbelievable today. Uh under the circumstances, maybe one of the best matches that I've played this year. These days he has another 23 majors under his belt and has spent more time ranked at number one in the world than any other player.

Tim Cross is a senior science writer at The Economist. One interesting detail about Djokovic's life is that he was a child prodigy, and that's maybe what most people think of when they think of people who are outstanding in their particular fields. But a new paper just published in Science suggests that that kind of success, taking a child, schooling them intensively early on, and then they go on to conquer their chosen field, might actually be more of an exception than the rule.

And it concludes that the very best performers, and this is in all sorts of fields, not just tennis, tend to follow quite a different path. Tim, does this mean that we shouldn't be forcing kids to specialise at a young age in anything really? Well, I think it depends on what you mean by success. So this study was run by a sports scientist named Arni Gullich at the RPT University Kaiserslausen Landau.

in Germany. And he and his colleagues crunched data on more than thirty four thousand elite performers. And what's interesting is that there'd already been rumblings in the sports science world that suggested that maybe this sort of pophouse model didn't necessarily work when it came to producing the absolute tip top performers. But what this paper does that's interesting is it extends the analysis so it looks at at lots of other areas like chess or classical music and even academia.

And what it concludes is that if the kids who are sort of most intensely schooled and go into that hot house model, They do tend to do well, but they seem not to be quite as likely to become real standout superstars. And in fact, they show that the very best young people and teenagers and the very best adults are actually two almost entirely different sets of people. So if you look at sport or if you look at chess, even if you look at salaries at the age of thirty or forty.

Ninety percent of the people who do really well as teenagers are not in the top flight when they're adults, and ninety percent of the top flight adults were not in the top flight when they were teenagers. And similarly, if you look at those people who do achieve superstardom at the very, very tip top of their field, if you look at them, interestingly, they tend not really to stand out quite as much at an early age. They seem to take longer to reach their peak.

And they seem to keep their interests wider for longer rather than specializing at a very, very young age. So what's wrong with a hot house? Well, if all you care about is producing high performance, nothing's necessarily wrong with it. It seems that hot housing will reliably do that.

the thing it might not reliably do is put someone at the very, very top of their field. So we're talking here about the difference between, say, someone who's ranked in the top ten in the world at chess and someone who isn't. or an academic who won a Nobel Prize as opposed to academic

that were only nominated for Nobel Prizes. These are highly competent people, but they're not quite the absolute cream of the crop. So we're not exactly talking about crashing and burning then. But why is it good to keep your interests broader for longer? Well, that's a bit harder to know when you're looking at a kind of retrospective study like this. But the researchers have had a sort of stab at it anyway. They looked through the scientific literature for theories on how excellence arises.

and then compared them against the data they'd collected. told them. And none of them really seemed compatible. So they offer kind of three of their own instead. The first is called search and match, which is an idea apparently derived from labor market economics. And this is the idea that if you have a sort of broad range of interest and you wait a while before choosing which of them exactly to specialise in, that might give you a better chance of finding the field that really is best suited.

To your talents. One example to go back to tennis, Rafael Nadal, who was another all time great tennis player, he flirted quite seriously with a career in professional football before he eventually decided to go for tennis. Okay, so that's one theory. What are the others? The second one is called enhanced learning and this is the idea that learning is kind of itself a learnable skill. You can learn to be good at learning.

And that a good way to do that is to pursue lots of different things when you're young. The idea being that when the time comes to focus on just one, if you're better at learning, that makes your training more effective and it means you improve faster. And this This fits with the data in that from sort of academia to top level sports players, you see a pattern where the very, very best. they start out sort of not as good as their hot house contemporaries when they're young.

But when they do decide to specialise, they end up quite rapidly overtaking them. There's a concept in sports science called training efficiency. And the idea is basically if you don't specialise early, maybe your training efficiency is better in the rest of your life. And the final theory on why we see fewer child prodigies cross over to become elite adults?

So that one's called the limited risk hypothesis, and it's another fancy name for a quite straightforward idea, which is that the risk of a sort of hothouse approach is that youngsters might burn out or just become disenchanted with endless violin practice. Rydyn ni'n gwneud hynny'n gwneud hynny'n gwneud hynny'n gwneud hynny'n gwneud hynny'n gwneud hynny'n gwneud hynny'n gwneud hynny'n gwneud hynny.

Tim, in recent years we've seen a proliferation of sports academies, of specialist schools, all of them about hot housing and specializing. What does it mean for those? Well i i it's interesting. I mean Dr Gulich, when I spoke to him, he was sort of at pains to say that they're not arguing that the hot house model doesn't work. It does work. He thinks it's a reliable way to produce highly competent people. it's just maybe not a reliable way to produce the really, really world class ones.

So I suppose what you have to do if you're running one of those institutions is decide, you know, what exactly is your institution for? Are you happy to just churn out people in the the top one percent of achievement?

Or are you really going for the top sort of naught point naught one percent? And depending on your answer to that question, maybe you want to run things differently. So the ultimate point is don't push your children. I think if you're really aiming for the stars, maybe go a bit more gentle. Thanks, Tim. Great to talk to you. Thanks, Rosie.

I recently visited Uenozoo in Tokyo and found myself surrounded by people in tears. Moeka Iida is a reporter and researcher for The Economist and is based in Tokyo. That day, thousands of people had come to say goodbye to Shao Xiao and Leile, the twin giant pandas. They were sent to China a few days later. There were so many people and the zoo had to run a lottery to control the crowds. People were visibly upset and they were expressing their love for the pandas.

People wearing panda outfits and waving flags that read Thank you Shao Shao and Lele. Panda Taifan Taifandes. In the crowd, I met a woman called Iwabichimanaka. She was holding on to a handful of panda plushies. She told me she's a super fan, she's loved pandas her entire life.

She can't believe this is really happening, that the pandas are really leaving. And her shock was shared by a lot of people. For the first time in 54 years, Japan is left without any pandas. And this is making a lot of people upset in Japan. In Japan pandas are very popular, but there's also a bigger geopolitical story here. So the fact that Japan has zero pandas is very symbolic of the cooling relations between Japan and China.

Tell me why that is, why the the panda number should be tied to relations with China. Well, China often gifts pandas to countries where it has a strategic relationship or are friendly with. So the history of panda diplomacy in Japan dates back to nineteen seventy two. That was the year China gifted its first pair of pandas to Japan and it was the year the two countries normalized their diplomatic ties.

And since then the animals have become wildly popular in Japan and there has been a steady stream of pandas being sent to the country. And it's worth noting that effectively all pandas in the world technically belong to China. So for instance Xiao Xiao and Leile were born in Ueno in Tokyo a few years back, but it was set from the get go that they have to return to China at some point. So the departure of the last two Panthers then is a fairly direct diplomatic snub, you think?

Well, the Chinese side is not explicitly saying they're withdrawing pandas because the relationship is not looking good. On the surface, again, the official reason is just because of the contract. Their loan periods are expiring. But one geopolitical expert told me that if Japan-China relations were good. China would be sending replacements straight away. It wouldn't be leaving Japan without

any pandas. So I mentioned that Japan China relations aren't looking so good at the moment, and this is because at the end of last year, Japan's Prime Minister Takaichi Sanae, who's rather hawkish in China, said That Japan might intervene militarily in the wake of a Taiwan contingency, and that deviated from Japan's official stance, which had long respected the One China policy. And the response from China was.

furious. So they did things like advising Chinese citizens to refrain from traveling to Japan. They suspended seafood imports and most recently they also imposed restrictions on dual use goods. Interestingly, South Korea is set to receive new pandas. So recently there was a pretty friendly meeting between Yi Jiang Yong and Xi Jinping, and the two leaders even took selfies together on a Xiaomi phone that was gifted to the Korean president.

Yi Ji Myon made a direct request to Xi Jinping to get more pandas, so I would say the fact that the pandas are leaving Japan but heading to South Korea is quite telling of the diplomatic winds in the region.

And so what's your take on pandas in Japan though? Is this the end of the story for them? Well the panda fans are hopeful that the pandas will return eventually, and the geopolitical experts I spoke to also do think the pandas will return at some point. So Some people draw parallels with what happened to America.

America also did go without pandas for a while and at the time people called it punitive panda diplomacy, that China's withdrawing pandas to punish America, but they did get the pandas back in twenty twenty four. So a lot of people in Japan also hope the same thing will happen at some point. But in terms of when the pandas might return, that's really hard to tell.

Currently Takaichi is Prime Minister. She is rather hawkish when it comes to foreign affairs, and it seems like her hawkish stance on China has also helped. boost her approval ratings. So I don't think she's going to soften her stance just because of pandas. And also if you look at the grassroots level, even though Japanese people love pandas, their love for pandas doesn't always extend to China.

So there was a poll recently that showed that nearly ninety percent of Japanese people hold negative views of China. But the most devoted fans remain undeterred, so I spoke to a man called Watanabe Haruki. He told me he's already planning a trip to China to see the twins again. And he told me he would follow the pandas wherever they go. Moika, thanks very much for joining us. Thank you so much for having me, Jason.

It's not just panda counts that are a window into international relations in Asia. Over on Drum Tower, our sister show on Chinese affairs, my colleagues look at the game of Go, one of the world's oldest board games. beloved in China, Japan, and South Korea. What should be a patient and genteel game at the pro level has led to an almighty scrap about rules, one that curiously reflects the tensions in the region. Subscribers should look for Drum Tower wherever fine podcasts are sold and traded.

That's all for this episode of the Intelligence. See you back here tomorrow. With no fees or minimums on checking accounts. No wonder the Capital One bank guy is so passionate about banking with Capital One. If he were here, he wouldn't just tell you about no fees or minimums, he'd also talk about how most Capital One cafes are open seven days a week to assist with your banking needs. Even on weekends, it's pretty much all he talks about, in a good way.

What's in your wallet? Terms apply. See Capital One.comslash bank. Capital One N A member F D I C.