S6 Ep33: The Sad, Mad GOP Base (with Amy Walter) - podcast episode cover

S6 Ep33: The Sad, Mad GOP Base (with Amy Walter)

Apr 11, 202652 minSeason 6Ep. 33
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Summary

The Focus Group Podcast delves into the dissatisfaction brewing within Trump's 2020 and 2024 voter base, many of whom are alienated by his current policies, particularly on the economy and foreign affairs. Featuring Amy Walter, the episode analyzes how this disengagement, coupled with a narrowing political map, poses a significant challenge for Republicans in the midterms. Voters express regret and a sense of betrayal, especially concerning the Epstein files, revealing a potential "stay home" despair that could benefit Democrats if they can capitalize on the shifting political landscape.

Episode description

EDITOR'S NOTE: This episode has been updated to remove comments made by or about a focus group participant who we believe misrepresented his political viewpoints to gain access to the group. We are reviewing our participant screening processes accordingly.

If there's a blue wave in the 2026 elections, it'll be either because new people start voting for Democrats, or the current Republican base gets sad and stays home. So we convened a focus group of 2020 and 2024 Trump voters who are unhappy with his administration to give you a sample of the kind of despair that could keep Republicans home in November. Amy Walter, editor-in-chief of the Cook Political Report, returns to the show to break down the midterm landscape.

Transcript

Introduction: The Sad, Mad GOP Base

A

The dichotomy used to be, well I don't like the mean tweets, but the economy's good, or or I don't like Trump the person, but I like his policies. And now they don't like Trump the person or his policies at the moment.

🎵 Music

A

Hello everyone and welcome to the Focus Group podcast. I'm Sarah Longwell, publisher of The Bulwark, and this week we're gonna talk about Trump's base and how they'll affect the midterm elections.

Uh

A

You know, the people that we're gonna listen to today are Trump voters like 2020, 2024. Trump voters, but they are mad as hell, uh, at the administration and the state of the country. But it remains to be seen whether they're gonna take it anymore. That's my producer. They're mad as hell, but we don't know if they're gonna take it anymore.

Great job, Connor. Uh I think some recent special elections are showing a real enthusiasm gap. Marjorie Taylor Green's old congressional districts t swung twenty-five points toward Democrats in the special election just this past week. Uh, though that still wasn't enough for the Democrat to win, but that's a big swing. Uh and if there's a blue wave in November, it may have as much to do with the sad GOP base staying home as with Democrats converting a bunch of new voters.

We're gonna acclimate to the political environment these uh sad Trump voters are living in. We're also gonna explore some of the more exotic views these folks have. Because by the end of the show, you might find yourself saying, I can't believe this person is souring on the Trump administration.

My guest today is Amy Walter, editor-in-chief of the Cook Political Report with Amy Walter, here for her seventh appearance on this show. She is the most, the guest with the most, the guest we have the most. The OJ. You were my first episode. We did it together. Exactly.

B

I feel very proud of that. And uh I'll be waiting for my seven timers jacket. I got a mug for five time, but

A

Yeah.

B

It's a nice mug. I just

A

The focus groupie bug.

E

Yeah.

B

Yeah, a vest would be nice, but I'll I'll wait.

A

Okay, so Uh, you're my favorite person to talk to about everything. People should know we're like IRL friends. Um but uh you've been doing political analysis for a long time and I just am curious broadly as we Start to set the stage because I bet you'll be back on the show before the actual midterm elections. And so it's just like where we are right now. So we're still a long way away. Um, but how do you think it compares? It is it's shaping up. to, you know, 2006, 2010, 2018.

Midterm Election Landscape

B

It feels like the political environment is as bad as those years that you just mentioned for the party that's in the White House. The biggest difference is just that the playing field is a lot narrower. So with similar numbers in 2018.

Donald Trump's party lost forty seats in the House. To lose forty seats in the House this time, Trump's numbers have to be even worse. I mean Decidedly worse because even if you put every district, if if if Democrats were to flip every district that Trump lost, or carried by less than ten.

A

which is a lot

B

10 points is a lot. That still only gets you if they want every one of them 27 seats. So in order to hit a number like forty, they will Democrats would have to win in seats. Not necessarily like Marjorie Taylor Green's where he won by like twenty five or thirty or whatever it was, but would have to move into seats where Trump won by ten you know, more than ten, twelve, thirteen, fourteen.

That's very hard to do. But where we sit today, this is and I think I I'm glad you pointed out the special elections because look, they are special. They are not normal turnout. Democrats dominate in lower turnout elections. We know this. So we should not take this as a apples to apples comparison for what we expect to see. in the fall when voters, even Republicans will be more engaged. But what it does give us is the latest signal of how enthusiastic Democrats are and how not very interested.

Republicans are. And that to me is if I if I were sitting over in a Republican campaign right now, that would be my number one concern is is that, okay. We know that independents have soured on Trump, which means they're not likely to come out and vote for us. Um Republicans are sticking with Donald Trump in that they say they still like him. But they're not. liking him enough or don't feel threatened enough to come out and vote for a Republican.

Democrats' Uphill Battle

A

Yeah, just one quick nerd point that I think you and I are well positioned to talk about, which is Th your point about how much narrower the field is is something that

Hopefully people will start talking about more and understanding because I do think Democrats need to understand how much the map is starting to just narrow for them in general. Like when you get to twenty thirty two and we get uh they do the new census, uh I I this is why um uh and again I am not plugging my book, I'm only referencing it, but the one of the reasons that I really wanted to write it is that I can feel us moving into

the normal swings of politics, right? Donald Trump is unpopular, uh, therefore the he is likely to do or the Democrats are very likely to do well in in twenty twenty-six.

And that may vary well depending on how Trump's term goes and depending on how much d damage this does to JD Vance and Marco Rubio being associated with him or other Republicans. We're in this moment of people liking to switch back, like they always want something new. And so you could see that environment being favorable for Democrats.

But just still in the big sort of political picture, Democrats have this like an enormous amount of work to do to be able to sort of sustain any political momentum besides the normal back and forth. So I don't know if you can speak to any of that.

B

I think that is exactly right. And that's especially true with the Senate map. I mean, again, in two thousand and six, when Democrats did win Ohio, and that was Sherrod Brown's first election. Um, he knocked off a Republican incumbent then. So in two thousand four, George W. Bush narrowly won Ohio, right? So he had to win in a state that Bush carried but Not by that much. Today Sherrod Brown has to try to win back the seat that he was defeated last cycle in.

In a state that Trump carried by I think eleven, twelve points in twenty twenty four. So that's what we're talking about. A state like Ohio. again, in the old olden days, uh, would be gone in a wave year. Now it's very competitive and Sherrod Brown may indeed be able to flip it, but it is not one of those oh boy, this should be kind of a layup for us. Even a state that on paper should be a layup, which is Maine, a state that has not ever voted for Donald Trump.

Is not an easy one for Democrats because of one, how strong Susan Collins and her brand is, but also because, well, Democrats have kind of a mess on their hands in the primary and um it's not c qua uh quite as clean and crisp as, say, North Carolina. So if Democrats are to win the majority in the Senate, it has to go through states like Ohio, like Alaska, like Texas, like Iowa, all places that Trump has carried by double digits. If Democrats can't win there,

in a great year for Democrats. You're exactly right, Sarah. That sets up really terribly, not just for what twenty twenty-eight, twenty thirty, beyond could mean for Democrats. for presidential, but also what it would really mean to have a Senate majority. Um, you can't build a Senate majority just on the seven swing states. I mean look.

Democrats, where they've been successful in the era of Trump is in swing states. They have won, I think the number is s uh seventeen out of twenty one since twenty sixteen Senate races. In-swing, you know, purple battleground states. That's a pretty good track record. But now get outside of the purple states.

And

B

There you are. That's why Democrats are in the minority.

A

put a like quick fine point on this. Places like Florida, places like Iowa, places like Ohio, like there's a bunch of these places Democrats used to be competitive and often win. Yep. And like they're off the map. for Democrats now, which means Democrats have to find other places to win. And so they'd obviously always kinda hoped they could get there in Texas or like and it's just they're not getting there at Texas now that's possible in a wave year.

We could, you know, it's p I I am I believe it's possible Tal Rico can do this if the all the conditions line up. He's got a Paxton and it's a wave and he runs a really great campaign and you know, all the things. Um that it's just maybe possible. It's not a it's not an easy place for Democrats to win and they haven't proved that they can do it yet. So like um I I I I what I want is to sort of caution people against feeling too

It's not bullish because they should feel bullish on twenty twenty six. I think people just need to realize But as you led with, how little ground there is to gain without opening up new parts of the map. opening up uh a new ability to attract like a wide swath of voters. Like if it's just these little margins, it's by the five inches in front of our faces as they've been these last few elections, like that's not going to be enough as Democrats go forward. Okay.

Disappointed Trump Voters Speak

Uh, but a key part of this, a key part of how Democrats could get more successful is because Republican enthusiasm. just falls through the floor. Um, and so it was really interesting to do some groups uh with uh people who voted for Trump a bunch of times. Uh but feel like he's doing a terrible job. Cause we've been doing on this show, we've been doing a lot of swing motors, a lot of Biden

to Trump voters in recent weeks. We've talked to them about the war in Iran. They do not like the war in Iran. But we wanted to see like, okay, what about people who are firmly in the Trump coalition? So the first couple of clips you're gonna hear were about Trump's uh address to the nation. You guys may remember this on April first. Uh that was before he threatened to destroy Iran's entire entire civilization, but it was when we all watched thinking, are we gonna get information about

What we're doing next. And it was a ended up being a pretty bizarre speech. And so we talked to these voters right after that. Let's hear what they said.

G

looking for some s something with substance uh like when we're gonna be done. And uh instead of a checklist of who we've we've killed lately and uh comparing them that we've only had thirteen service people that have died. There wasn't a really a whole lot new. I was kind of expecting a whole lot more.

C

I mentioned that it was, you know, vague in terms of timelines and outcomes and you know, the straight of horror moves will like remedy itself. But there was a complete lack of acknowledgement about what's going on um to the people he's ostensibly leading. meaning us, prices, gas, uh everything else. There was no kind of recognition or empathy there.

Without couching things in any way, I think it's a disaster. I think on every level, domestic governance, the economy, foreign policy, immigration, the social climate. Um, they're in a terrible state and I uh focus that blame directly on Trump and the administration.

F

being in this situation where I've sold my house and I have this like lump of money that I have, you know, set aside to build my new house and then we go to war in Iran and all the like prices just, you know, like Like there's a lot of transport that I'm uh you know uh arranging, you know, like getting my campers down there or getting, you know, a concrete truck or, you know, insulation or whatever. And the prices are just going up, but my pile of money's not getting any bigger.

A

Oh yeah.

G

For oil and you know, like the speech last night said, if we're producing all all this oil and all this energy How much skin in the game do we have? I mean, I understand we've got allies over in the Middle East, but our other allies in NATO aren't too crazy about the situation either.

D

war in Iran, I have a real problem with my dad's the Marine. I just don't believe in losing American lives for something that has nothing to do with us, right? So during the speech I'm just like, come on guys, let's support ourselves. I'm not America first girl, I'm sorry. So

B

I believe that we have to do that.

A

Yeah.

D

before we start handing out money to other countries and the price of groceries makes me want to cry.

B

Bye.

A

All right, so no war for oil. Um, I guess uh coming from two time Trump voters. Are you surprised that there's not even any equivocation or any like attempt to say that the war in Iran is good? Like did any did that strike you as interesting about this group?

B

Here's what uh struck me about this group. Well, it felt like these were folks some of them, Sarah were three time Trump voters.

A

Yeah.

B

And their reasons for voting for Trump ranged to me from look, I'm a Republican and I wanted to vote for the guy who I thought was the businessman was going to cut my taxes, capital gains, blah, blah.

C

Blah blah.

B

Then there was one woman in there who was a Maha person, right? I l I really liked RFK. I thought, you know, I'm against vaccines, all of this. Okay. And then you had a bunch of them who were, I just I couldn't vote for Hillary, I couldn't vote for Kamala. I would not put them in a category of MAGA. I separate them in the way of when we talk about the split on the war with Trump's base, I thought what was fascinating about this. And how different it looks from, say, the Tucker Carlson split.

And the Marjorie Taylor Green split, who really were basing it on we are an America first party. This is not who we're supposed to be. Um and really on on on ideological grounds, this is where this fight is happening. For these voters, it really came down to I voted for you because I really thought you were going to bring my capital gains down, right? Or you were going to do something on the economy to fix stuff.

Or you just, you know, I didn't I wasn't ex super excited, but it was better than uh what the options were in front of me, whether that was Harris or Biden or whoever. And at the end of the day. I'm not getting what I voted for. And so that to me, you know, th this is why you're seeing, I think if if we had a MAGA group here, you might get some who would say, I absolutely

disagree what the president's doing. I feel like I'm an America first person and this isn't America first. But I think the more dangerous uh group of voters for Republicans right now are those who went and voted for Trump because of economic reasons and feel as if he is doing anything but focusing on economics.

The Divided Republican Base

A

At the risk of the an our analysis getting boring, there's some other things going on, but like at its core. Literally everything about our political environment can be explained by people who said, I couldn't vote for Biden. It was all about the economy. And I just wanted him to lower my prices. And there was one guy in this group, actually, I don't know if we'll end up playing exactly him saying this, but he was like,

I don't really tell people I voted for Trump because I feel like I really regret it and feel bad about it, but I just basically looked at my own finances and said who's going to be better for him as I voted for him. And I just I there's if there's one thing I hear over and over again from people who are not super ideological, they're just like, I think a lot of voters, right? They're just like,

I'm trying to figure out who's gonna be best for me and I'm trying to match that with my general partisan leaning because there's a framework around politics that it you know suits me a little better. Those are not the Trump first voters. Exactly. And and so when you say MAGA, this is why it's so funny. You see some of these people do this now where they break out the polling from people who identify as MAGA.

and people who don't. And if you identify as MAGA, it's basically preordained that you will then support whatever issue follows from that because all you care about is whatever Trump's doing, I'm gonna say yes. That's just how that MAGA strain works. The rest of them and it's not even using normie isn't even quite right. It's just a little bit of a

B

There's a range. I mean, there were some who I would put into the normie d Republican category. This is who I, you know, the these this is what I consider. the old school Republican. And to me, Sarah, that's like the n the thirty zillion dollar question for this cycle, which is if only MAGA shows up to vote. Because these other re self-identified Republicans or self-identified Trump voters either stay home Or in some cases may even choose to vote for a Democrat. How many seats does that put?

in play? How much more dangerous does that make Republicans hold of the Senate math? If you say, you know, instead of looking at the top line, what did Trump get in this state? But instead say, Did Trump MAGA vote in this state? Does that make sense? If you take you just go at like what is the core of the core? You're it is exactly right. No matter what. Tucker Carlson or Candace Owens or all those people say those people aren't, those core of the core Trump voters are going to stick with him.

The problem are these people for Republicans, are these people who say, yeah, I voted for Trump because he's a businessman and he was going to help us with the economy. And I thought, You know, the way they picked Kamala Harris was it was kind of rigged and I didn't really trust her and I definitely wasn't gonna vote for Hillary and Biden was blah, blah, blah. Those are the people that I don't know that Democrats can necessarily win them over, although a couple of them seemed open to it.

But if they stay home That is also problematic for Republicans.

A

And let me just add to that,'cause I think the way that this gets to perfect storm territory and you get like a cat seven, even with the narrower map, what happens is is that Not only do the these types of voters say, I'm so mad about all this, I'm either maybe voting for a Democrat or I'm not turning out.

Then you have the specific MAGA component. And this is always the problem for Trump's folks in the midterms, which is that they don't turn out either because Trump's not actually on the ballot. And, you know, there's a lot of those voters, right? Where it's like, Well, Trump can do no wrong, but the rest of these Republicans and like eh uh you know, and they're just not uh and maybe maybe they get mobilized because Trump.

tells them to, but I've also seen we've saw this in in twenty two where a lot of those voters just they don't turn out with the same l numbers. Um right because Trump's not actually on the ballot. Right. That's the dynamics where you end up with Trump on the ballot for the people who don't like him and not on the ballot, uh, for the people who love him.

B

Right, who love him the most and the people who feel so if you have two gro right. So if you have the group of people who voted for him but feel disappointed, they didn't get what they bargain for. What do they do? Do they stay home? Are they open to voting for a Democrat? And then you're right. Then you have the people who showed up for Trump, love Trump.

But they're not affiliated with party. They don't care who controls the House and Senate. They're not going to show up for an off-year election in the same way that, you know, the Obama coalition never turned out. when Obama wasn't on the ticket. Right. They were like, We're all for Obama, but I don't really care about the House and the Senate. Yeah.

A

That's right. Um, all right. So I wanna listen to why the voters disapprove of Trump, uh, because they had a lot of reasons why they disapproved and we asked for letter grades, which we often do.

Reasons for Trump Disapproval

Uh he fared poorly. He would be flunking. Uh he would be be not doing his parents would uh ground him. Let's listen to how people talk about why they disapprove of Trump more broadly.

H

I think you got screwed in twenty twenty. It's another that's another, you know, another topic, another conversation. Um, and I think some of that stuff started off strong. It looked good, you know, like initially, and then it's literally it's like you just You you know, you you woke up Monday morning and it's like, oh, we're we're we're we're bombing our Iran now. You know, freaking gas is, you know, pushing five dollars a gallon and you know, he's he's got

you know, Lindsey Graham, you know, chirping in his ear, y you know, of of all people and, you know, Mark Levin and all these other people. So um yeah, I I d just for me personally, for twenty twenty four, and I give me the the D rating.

D

I am a three time loser. I voted for him three times. I I believed in his vision. He had like this hope that he was outside of that

whole D C swamp and that he was actually gonna drain the swamp. Like that's what I was really hopeful for. And I feel like in is such a downward turn as soon as the Epstein files came out, which really puts this thing in my heart to think that maybe he did do something bad because it's like now, I mean, everything is going wrong after the even the threat of the Epstein files.

Um, and my home base is Texas and gas is almost five dollars a gallon here, which is ridiculous, right? Because we make the gas and it it comes from up the street. So I can only imagine what you guys are paying and I have a twenty five hundred dually that has carries a forty one foot R V on it. So it's really uh a lot for me to take in.

C

I did hold my nose the times that I voted for him, thinking that behavior, dishonesty, volatility, that it was all just noise. Um, but now seeing everything that's going on from who he put in his cabinet, you know, unqualified, um, Toadies, um, and obviously what he's doing to uh the country and the world uh has made me uh have sort of a a reawakening for what matters and I can't just look at my personal self interest uh when I vote.

D

I was holding it.

J

We would get that same president in 2016 where like, sounds bad the economy was booming, paychecks were lasting longer, things were growing. And it's not the same guy. And I would agree with Adam. He put in this cabinet a lot of yes men and not people to go, What are you doing?

B

What?

J

Stop. And I think this sounds bad. He almost needs people to come back and be like, look, I like you and I respect you, but I'm going to tell you how we're going to do it on how it's going to benefit.

C

Everybody.

B

In some senses I regret my vote but

I

voted for Kamala instead. So I'm kind of torn and that's why I picked that

A

I

right in the middle grenade grade.

A

So we didn't spend a ton of time uh asking how these people are thinking about you know, who or whether they're gonna vote in the fall. Um, because right now at this stage, people aren't the most reliable narrators about that. Like they'll tell you something, but I n that's that's not gonna it's not gonna stick. Um but I do think this is exactly what like stay home level despair sounds like in voters, uh, and for people who might not vote in the fall.

And Amy, I gotta say, I think a lot of people, especially people listening to this podcast, might wanna be screaming like, This is who he's always been, you know, this isn't a new guy. Like when when she's like, This is not the same guy. I think a lot of people are like, This is exactly the same guy. What are you talking about? But it what what I am struck by is

How an average voter in the first term, when there were all the other guardrails around him, he did have a lot of people who told him no, people who tried to stop him from his worst impulses. He doesn't. have that now. And so people are getting the unadulterated Trump and they're not loving it uh quite as much the the normal people who want to see him reined in. Why do you think though people are getting the sense that he's changed?

B

Sarah, I think that's part of it. And I think the other piece, you know, even at his lowest points of his

A

First term.

B

If you asked people how they thought he was handling the economy, he would get positive ratings. True. And that there was always this, oh, I don't like the this and I don't like how he handled that and he's impulsive and he doesn't ha you know, I I don't like how he speaks to people and his behavior is abhorrent, but like at the end of the day.

Things are going pretty well. Like my 401k looks nice and I have a nice job and we got some extra clients on. And right. And so I sold my house for a nice bit of money. You could do as it What many of these people did do in previous elections is sort of a little bit of a little bit of a little put that in a box, right? And and and really compartmentalize the bad stuff away, but now there's not the good stuff. to overcome the bad stuff.

The Elusive Economic Pivot

The one thing a lot of them kept coming back to too, and this is why, you know, I also keep thinking, well, what could Trump do to get these people back on board? One of the things that you heard throughout was, I really liked the stuff he would say about DEI. I do think that was good. And the they didn't use the word woke, but you could tell that that's the kind of stuff that stuck with them over the last few campaigns.

Um they didn't talk as much about immigration. So it really was Iran and and uh the economy that dominated this conversation. But you could see some of the little pieces there of, you know, boy, if he would just get back onto the economy, if he would just get off this other stuff, maybe mm now some of these people may never come back, uh, the in this group that we listened to.

But um you understand why there are folks at the White House now and folks in the Republican campaign committees pulling their hair out because they keep saying We just need you to pivot to the economy, right? We just need you to get back up we we can get these people back, but we cannot talk anymore about Iran. Just no more Greenland. No more Ron, no more Rob Reiner, no more whatever, just

Can we just do the economy? We're gonna do the economy. Don't worry, says the White House. We're gonna pivot to that. It's all good. There's still time. It's only April, but you know, that is getting it's gonna get harder and harder. And yes. If Iran does indeed become something that is no longer a hot crisis by the time we get into the summer and gas prices do come down. This is not going to be the drag it is on the president's approval. Um

Today. But These folks really do wanna see the president re focus and that's gonna be the real question.

A

I think that if if if those conditions happened, right? The war is kind of in the rearview mirror, gas prices have recovered, you can you can Get you can do some vibes work there, right? The vibes won't feel as icky for Republicans. But without having a meaningful uh story to tell on the economy. they're not able to crawl out of the hole the way that they need to. Um, and I guess he could pivot, because you're right. I mean, if you I listen to these voters all the time. The dichotomy used to be

Well, I don't like the mean tweets, but the economy's good, or or I don't like Trump the person, but I like his policies. And now they don't like Trump the person or his policies at the moment. So that's where he gets really in the sour uh spot for these voters.

B

Well, it's about making the pivot. I guess that's the that's what you were saying. It's like how can he pivot onto the stuff? that those people want to hear. And what would that look like? And I do think it also gets harder, Sarah, because you think about, all right, what's been dominating news, the news coverage? All right. Obviously it's Iran right now. Before that it was

the DHS shutdown and TSA lines and TSA workers not getting paid and what what is happening there. We're going to go into the spring Ish, whatever what I don't know what you call this what era we're in right now, late spring, um with debates. uh within the Republican Party about doing some sort of reconciliation bill, right? Trying to get something done. Um, which is gonna put the focus back on

Republican infighting, right? Yeah. House Republicans don't like this, Senate Republicans say this. The president has to get involved, but he doesn't want to get involved. Right. So the the the pivot piece is a lot harder to do. than it looks. You know, on paper.

A

Yeah, I guess that's what I mean is that that just At the end of the day, even if some of these super bad conditions of now drift, you still have the affordability problem, which is the central problem. The only difference would be that right now, again, as you pointed out earlier, and this is one of my main things, the frustration of Trump

f where his focus is is a constant. They're like, I don't really care about the ballroom, but why is he focused on the ballroom instead of making things more affordable and not this. And so uh his focus would help, but it won't deliver, I think, tangible results for people in the next five, six months. Um okay.

Epstein Files: A Deep Betrayal

So we also heard some Jeffrey Epstein stuff in that last clip, uh, which It was a an interesting group from the fact that Efting came up a ton and it was like and it was i it was really at and it comes up a lot in groups that are dissatisfied with Trump. Um, but this group

was mad about it and talked about it maybe more uh unprompted brought it up more than a lot of other groups. Cause they totally see this effort uh by Trump is to sweep the Epstein files under the rug. So let's listen to how they talked about it.

J

Just at the point now where I

B

I'm like

J

Iran to hide what you were up to? And if we're not gonna prosecute, then I wouldn't be bombing and to divert the attention.

E

conspiracy theorist. Um, and the biggest one is all of the kid the girls missing, like uh Madeline from Italy, like all of these places that these kids have been taken. Um Epstein had bases there. And I'm like, huh, was she really like kidnapped? And you know, John Binet, all of these things. And I feel like

B

Like

E

All of a sudden it came out and they can't stop the you know, the floodgates of what's happening.

C

I'm not very conspiracy minded and it was clear that Trump and a lot of powerful people across the political spectrum and business and entertainment, you know, were involved in some pretty sketchy behavior, well illegal behavior. um exploit exploitative behavior. But again, I wasn't really, you know, can I didn't think the worst uh of Trump or anyone else that was the circles they ran in. But um with the release of the files, and you know, you could look online the DOG website.

You can read them, search through them, keywords. A lot is redacted, certainly, which is pretty suspicious. But it is plainly evident if you look. even superficially, that he has been involved and credibly accused of really horrible actions. against women against underage girls. Um it's not a speculation or money interpretation, it's there. Multiple FBI reports um corroborating the same thing.

H

Obviously Trump Trump's mention in the files, a a lot of it is, you know, he this person said this or this person said that, y you know, uh type of stuff. It's kinda like uh, you know, the the the the uh cover up is worse than the crime, you know, you know, type of approach. And everything uh that that they've done, uh as she had just mentioned, like, you know, why are we still talking about this?

You know, I had like this uh uh with just my career, like this investigative like mindset and and the things If you were to take any just one scenario that's in those files and apply that here, like locally, like to the sheriff's office, I can't even tell you.

the amount of resources and time and effort that would be put in to a case like that. I don't think a lot the majority of people realize uh that so many of these people uh our representatives, our government officials, They uh th they behave the way that they do, they vote the way that they do, they act the way they do, because when you're at that level, you have that much power, uh, blackmail is a powerful, powerful tool.

I

I used to be a felony prosecutor in a special victims unit. So my entire job was, you know, obviously it wasn't necessarily people to this level, but it was people arming children and doing all kinds of crazy sneaky things and ways and then being able to get away with it for years. And so if these like common folk are committing these crimes

B

Right.

I

then who we can we can probably not even begin to imagine what is actually happening on you know these

A

Abstain.

I

and things like that.

G

I liken it to uh the scandal in the Catholic Church twenty years ago, thirty years ago. And it took a long time for a lot of these lot of these people to come to justice on that. I I get the same feeling and so I

to see that this happening in in our leadership on both sides sides of the aisle blew me away watching ex President Clinton review those pictures and just shaking his head like he was reliving a memory with the with the w every time he flipped a page. You know, it's it's It's sickening and it's saddening.

F

It's like

C

The kind of

F

thing that I would never think of. So to like read it, like it's gonna put something horrible into my mind that I never would have been. exposed to any other way. I like I think that like those people all need to be brought to justice no matter what that means. No matter th like who they are or how powerful they are or, you know

I think that a lot of the stuff that's happening now is because of the Epstein files. I think the war in Iran or the Venezuela thing. I think these things are happening as a distraction because I think that they're that bad.

A

The distraction stuff coming from Trump voters, because that you hear that from Democrats constantly, but to have that coming from Trump voters was pretty notable. I also think it was telling that the main divide in the group was less about whether the fires files are being handled appropriately and more about how much personal involvement Trump uh had with Epstein. Like that was the debate that was happening in the group.

If you and I took a time machine back to the day after the 2024 election and said that Jeffrey Epstein's crimes Would be such a big driver of dissatisfaction with the administration. Like, would that have surprised you? Have you been surprised by the shift in the environment around this issue?

Conspiracy Theories and Elite Betrayal

B

Absolutely. So much of this comes back to what the fundamental attraction of many voters to Donald Trump has been, which is Yeah, this guy is part of the elite and all of that and was wealthy, but I don't know if truth to power is the right word, but he's gonna he's gonna take down those know-it-alls. He's gonna go after the elitists.

He's going he talks like regular people do. He understands the ways in which these highfalutin people have gotten away with stuff for years and he's gonna he's gonna bring them you know, sort of bring them to to heal. And yes. Here we are. We have all the files. We have all these names. We have all the horribleness that these folks were talking about that was outlined in the files. And no one gets prosecuted. How is that possible?

How could you possibly be reliably committed to taking down elites and not getting

A

One

B

And um so that's really to me what what came through the most is that if you're not prosecuting, there has to be a reason. What other reason could there be? I mean, a lot of these folks you had A number of them were like, oh yeah, no, I'm I'm big into conspiracies, right? Like they they are already open to these ideas. There was a reference to John Bene Ramsey, right? Like we are we're gonna go open a lot of wormholes.

But at the core of it is the idea that powerful people keep things from regular people. And look, Trump's success has long been, and I think it was successful in twenty twenty four as well, that um These guys aren't gonna tell you the truth, I will. And then he didn't. And that's where they feel um again like It's it's not just that they're disappointed. They feel as if they had um Given him too much credit.

A

it. Yeah. Uh you do mention, and this is a real thing that happens now uh a lot in groups where oftentimes people couch what they're about to say with I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but and then you're like, I'm probably gonna hear some conspiracy theories now. Except that now a bunch of people are just like, I am a conspiracy theorist and I would Or like I'm down for this stuff. I I like thinking about how different issues

hit voters because sometimes I think there's issues that come fast and furious, people get really exercised about them, and then when they're gone, people kind of move away from them. And then there's issues that are slow to settle, but they stick.

B

That's the stickiness of this is what is r really quite something and and surprising to me. And that's what one woman said when she said that uh that's what she was frustrated. about was when when he said something like, This is old news, let's move on and she said, when you read these files and see the the vileness that was done.

How can you just move on from that? This isn't, you know, some sort of misdemeanor that we should stop talking about. So I think maybe that's why it's so sticky, or is there something else, Sarah? Like what is keeping this? Still top of mind.

A

So I think number one, I think a lot of people were invested genuinely. Like they thought they were gonna get to take down this big elite cabal and instead the people they thought were gonna help them do it aren't. So there's something s there's something specific about it. I also think that it is an Easy entry point.

for people to discuss Trump's betrayal, which they feel broadly, but the Epstein files is one of the quickest things to reach for to talk about the betrayal and and the feeling of this is the opposite of who you were supposed to be. I got I can't tell you

how much of as people are they're trying to like figure out what it is that they're s why they're so disappointed with Donald Trump. And I think for each of them, they're kind of reaching for the thing that they thought he was going to be that had stuck in their mind for the kind of person he was, one of them being Great businessman who's gonna fix our economy. And and each of those things

is a disappointment right now. Um, even even the on immigration, where you're right, that wasn't as much in this group, although it's all over lots of other ones. And certainly when things were happening in Minneapolis, nothing came up that didn't talk about the immigration thing. The number of people who just say

Well, I wanted him to close the border, but I didn't want him to go after people who've been here for twenty years and I think the way he's doing it is extreme. It's sort of that. They're like I heard him say that he was just gonna deport criminals.

And they're like, I believe that that's what he was saying. Now, of course that's not what he actually said. Like if you were really listening, but the vibes that voters picked up was this guy's gonna deport criminals. I'm for that. But like he's not gonna grab a grip who's been here for twenty years.

Why is he doing that? Why is he m scaring all these people? Anyway, I I think that there's a lot of betrayals that people are feeling and Epstein is one because I I I've always believed this is one of the reasons gay marriage, the trans stuff, ever

Everyone like on the I don't want to say that this is sex stuff because it's it's actually worse that it's my it's not sex stuff. It is a uh it is the the cover up of a pedophile ring. And so it is uh many degrees worse than that. But I do think people can access those topics the most quickly because it's the easiest for them to understand. Like as opposed to tax policy or whatever. Right, right, right, right. So I do want to just as we'cause we're gonna close out with just a little bit more uh

The Epstein story kind of rhymes with some of the more exotic conspiracy theories we've heard over the years, like Pizzagate. And I wanna talk the Pizzagate has been coming back up and they talked about Pizzagate and other conspiracy theories. Let's listen.

H

Somebody mentioned a conspiracy theory. You know, I heard someone a while back, you know, say what's the difference between a conspiracy theory and the truth? And they said about six months. Anyone go down the uh adrenochrome rabbit hole?

F

I think back to like Pizzagate and like where people were like, Oh my gosh, you believe that there's like politicians like in the basement of pizza shop? Well it turns out it just they had the right stuff. It was just a private island instead of a pizza shop.

You know, and but it was like the it was the most insane thought that, you know, people thought you were insane if you thought any like all these people, you think that there's people on both sides of the aisle like, you know Doing this you know how like involved in these activities and it's like yeah.

G

Yeah, yeah, they actually were.

F

Like it actually wasn't that crazy.

H

You know, it wasn't just like John Podesta, you know, was trying to be a funny guy or, you know, you we never meant making an inside joke about something. It like that term, uh like, you know, pizza gate, you know, the h hot dogs, y you know, the a candy, you know, you know, whatever it is, these are all grown adult men in significant positions of power, you know, speaking to one another like this, and any normal or

rational or sane-minded person would be like, you know, well, hold up here. What what what what do what are we talking about here? What what what do you need 187, you know, hot dogs for? Like it's just very, very, very, very bizarre.

B

Pedestrian.

D

laptop had the insurance file or whatever that was supposed to be Hillary Clinton and her little aide on there. And like eight out of the twelve police officers committed suicide. Swear to ya, you can look it up. I I I've gone deep into that because

B

Is it free?

A

Me out.

C

We're not here to debate each other, but if you are reading a lot, you know, be careful about what you're reading. There's propaganda and conspiracy theories on every side, um, including the eight of twelve officers committing suicide. So I'm sure there's a lot of convincing info out there.

A

So uh I wanted to play that because I did lest people listen to this group and think. Well these sound, you know, like very mm this is why I didn't want to quite say normies. Like no, one guy had to step in and be like, What are you all talking about? Even as they were talking, I remember being like What are these theories? What are what were these? I don't even remember these. There's a whole chapter in my book called Conspiracy Land, because

When you do these focus groups, you just realize how wild the information environment is and what people are choosing to like ingest. That's right.

B

And some people at least some of them are admitting it's a conspiracy rather than, no, no, no, this this is true. believe this because this is true. I did my I did my research. I do feel like some of it is this diffused media environment where we don't really know where anything comes from anymore. Even people who think of themselves, like you and I, where we spend all of our time in information space. Um often. hearing things or reading things that

May not come from good place, right? They did and or and or we just can't remember where we got it from. So I I absolutely.

The Disinformation Environment

A

We scrolled by it so fast.

B

So all of us. Doesn't matter who you are, what you do for a living, you're getting inundated with information constantly and having to sift through that is really, really challenging. And so you have to go into the to um, I think maybe like a default setting. Where either one, you just default to I don't believe anything until I can go verify it by 16 different sources, or I don't believe it if it comes from this place or that place.

I only believe it if it comes from this place. Or everything you receive, you believe there is underneath it all an ulterior motive. Right. And so I think that is some of the way that the human brain has to try to manage this onslaught of information that washes over S And it's just another reminder of how challenging it is for candidates, for campaigns, for media organizations to get the truth and get facts and get information out.

and get it to penetrate through all of this stuff. And, you know, it is uh uh why the the fact that we don't have guardrails and we don't have the referees any longer. There is no people talk to me about, well, the media. Well, who's the media anymore? I don't know what that means. People are forced to kind of be their own referees. And that leaves a lot of room for these sorts of conspiracy theories to bubble up. Normally, when the conversation is about Nephoria.

various stories or conspiracies. We had, of course, all of the Hillary Clinton and the laptop. and the emails and we had the Hunter Biden laptop. It defaulted to the benefit of Donald Trump. Now it is not. And that's that's what's different.

A

Yeah, I talk about the grammar of hidden knowledge, which is just a thing that is like all over the groups, which is the idea that there is a cabal kind of controlling things that and there's something that is hidden, things are rigged. Um, you're trying to uncover something. And that's what happens when both institutional trust is gone. Uh that's not just the media, but it's, you know, somebody brought up the Catholic Church.

But this is one of the reasons that the Epstein stuff is so potent in my mind. Is that guy what he said was, What is the difference between a conspiracy theory and the truth? And he said, six months. Ah, I've heard that before. I people sort of say that in groups. It's a it's a funny thing because the Epstein.

Saga is proof to a lot of these guys. Like what you're saying is like, yeah, Pizzagate wasn't quite right. They weren't right that it was in this basement of Comet Ping Pong, which by the way, great, great pizza place in DC. Uh Great place if you have ki kids too. Play ping pong. Uh but it's not happening there.

But it did happen. Uh now, to be fair, most of the right wing conspiracies about this though also included like Hillary Clinton and like the skin of babies, and I can't even remember about all of the insane things. I what I what is interesting is that these guys are kind of circling around something which is like, oh no, our guys were the bad guys. Or who were like the Trump was with Epstein. I think that that's part of the, again, when I talk about it settling, is I do think that

People are starting to as it it comes and floods in, they're not immediately willing to reject Trump on it. But as it is settled with people, they're like, I don't know what else to make of this other than he was part of this somehow. Um and so, but that to them makes it seem like Well see, see, this conspiracy theories, they might not be exactly right on all the details, but they are directionally correct, which makes every subsequent conspiracy seem more legitimate.

The Future of the Republican Coalition

One last thing, uh, here. I have long warned that the MAGA establishments, sort of the JD Vance of the world, are gonna have a hard time keeping people like this engaged and in the tent in a post-Trump world. Um when as you like look out ahead, how do you think that the right grapples with a coalition that's so disengaged and mistrustful that it doesn't even trust MAGA?

B

That's a very, very good question. And at one point the moderator asked these participants. how they felt about JD Vance. What was interesting, a number of them what they liked about him was they mentioned Hillbilly elegy and sort of his backstory. And so they kind of liked going back to this idea of

All American boy grew up having a hard life. He can relate to regular people. One woman said, Oh, I don't like Trump. I don't like MAGA, but I really like Usha, right? It was all about she she is the reason. His wife is the whole reason that I would support him. So in that sense, he does have something of an identity outside of MAGA, right? He was this guy who grew up in Appalachia

the, you know, pull yourself up by your bootstraps piece attracts them. At the same time, there is a weariness and a wariness. of what the Republican Party has become or what it will be or what uh even what it is right now. Um that gives them a pause. You know, so this is I mean look, it makes a lot of sense, Sarah, that this is a group of people who have soured on Donald Trump. So they're not gonna be like, Yeah, let's go get his vice president and put them put him in office.

Or let's go take Marco Rubio, his current Secretary of State, who's Overseeing the thing in Iran that we don't like. So we're getting them at a time where they would be least likely. to be supportive of somebody that comes from the Trump administration. But I do think overall the what what we're coming to see is the challenge of keeping together the coalition that elected Donald Trump.

Even as he's president, right? He's having a hard time as president keeping that coalition together. Now imagine. coming from that administration and trying to get those people to come out and vote.

A

Four.

B

You right? Trying to get back the young Men voters who we know polls are showing have continue to give the Trump administration low marks. Latino voters giving him low marks. Independence, we know that those numbers are terrible right now for Trump. So getting those people which was the key to twenty twenty four, but also keeping the folks who are pure MAGA, who are all about Donald Trump.

I may not be sold on whoever is the person who supposedly is the next Donald Trump or the one who's gonna wear the MAGA. crown. Um, that is a tough thing to pull off.

A

I'll just close by saying the reason I felt like I needed to write a book right now is that I think there is a historic element to or a historic opportunity. A generational opportunity to reset the way politics is, not from a like we're in a new world of information and all of these things, but to me the dynamic.

of Trump being able to singularly hold this coalition together and him being gone in some way, probably still around, uh whatever. But The Republican Party having to deal with the fact that Trump has spent will have spent more than a decade teaching their voters to hate the party and only love him. Is just if the Democrats could just figure out how to get there in a few places.

Uh they could figure out how to make sure people felt like Democrats would keep them safe, uh where they had sort of a hey, we're and this isn't about being more moderate or more progressive. It is about Democrats feeling like they have a a propulsive direction. They they know what they stand for. They are they are pushing popular issues. They are focused on the economy and working class again.

The extent to which the thing that we started with, the challenge of the map, the way that that could be seized. In this moment when Republicans just these kinds of voters are super disenchanted with the party and the Trump people who are just there for Trump now aren't interested because Trump's not there. that whole thing could collapse. Like there's a world in which and it's not not even a crazy world.

There was a real chance that that coalition collapses and a lot of people up for grabs. The question is, can you go grab'em? And that's gonna be the challenge for Democrats, and that's what I tried to to deal with in the book. All right, Amy Walter. Thank you so much for joining us for the seventh time.

B

Enjoyed it. As always. Thank you for the invite, Sarah.

A

Thanks to all of you for listening to the Focus Group Podcast. Remember to rate and review us on Apple Podcasts. Subscribe to the Bulwork on YouTube. Become a Bullwork Plus member at theBullwork.com. We'll see you guys next week and Amy will be back before this cycle is over.

This transcript was generated by Metacast using AI and may contain inaccuracies. Learn more about transcripts.
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android