3 million pages of evidence. Thousands of unsealed flight logs. Millions of data points, names, themes and timelines connected. You are listening to the Epstein Files, the world's first AI native investigation into the case that traditional journalism simply could not handle. Foreign welcome back to the Epstein Files. Last time we walked through the medical examiner. Today we are following the guards through the documentary record so the timeline, decisions and institutional failures are clear.
As always, every document and source we reference is available at epsteinfiles fm. So start with Tova Noel and Michael Thomas. That is where the paper trail becomes specific and testable. It really is. It's the one point in this whole story where we have this precise intersection. Intersection of what exactly? Of federal employment records, of video surveillance logs, and crucially, of criminal indictments. So we're focused on the night of August 9, 2019 and into the morning of the 10th.
The two subjects are Tova Newell and Michael Thomas, the correctional officers assigned to the special housing unit, the shu, at the Metropolitan Correctional center in New York. The mcc. Before we get into the individuals, let's establish the environment. The SHU is not general population. This is 9 South. Correct. 9 South is a segregated unit. It's designed for the highest risk inmates. Which means the procedures, the rules, they're different. They're far more rigorous.
The post orders, that's the official Bureau of Prisons term for the instructions, are incredibly strict. And we know what they were. We do. The indictment against Jeffrey Epstein jail guards filed by the sdny, it lays out exactly what those orders required of them. This isn't a vague set of guidelines. The indictment actually lists specific times. It is extremely specific. The post orders mandate two separate kinds of verification. Okay, what's the first? The institutional count.
This is the formal head count. The inmate has to be visually identified, not just on a list. You have to see them. See them present and living. And for that night, the required counts were scheduled for 4.00pm, 10.00pm, 12.000am, 3c0am and 5.00am so that's the count. But you said there was a second layer, right? Rounds beyond those formal counts. The post orders mandate that officers conduct rounds every 30 minutes.
Every 30. It involves walking the tier, looking into each cell and just ensuring the inmate's safety and security. For any prisoner, that's frequent. For an inmate who's recently on suicide watch, that 30 minute rhythm is the only thing standing between them and potential self harm. It's a primary preventative measure. So we have this very clear set of instructions. Counts on the hour Rounds every half hour. Now, let's talk about the personnel. Noel and Thomas.
They were the last line of defense, institutionally speaking. But the documents suggest they were also part of a larger problem. They were symptoms of it. If you look at the pinpoint database records on MCC staffing, it's all there. Michael Thomas, for instance. He was working mandatory overtime. Mandatory. So he didn't volunteer for the shift. He was ordered to stay. That's right. The records show a severe staffing shortage at the MCC around this time. And the pinpoint documents specifically.
EFT 000018132, they discussed this. They discussed the facility's reliance on overtime just to fill sensitive posts like the shu. So Thomas was working a double. He'd already worked a full eight hour shift before he even started the overnight watch on Nine South. What about Tova Null? He was also on overtime, though the records we have suggest his was voluntary. But the critical factor here is fatigue. It has to be.
You have one officer who's been forced to stay, another who's picking up extra hours. And they're both assigned to the most sensitive unit in the entire facility, manning the watch over the most high profile inmate in the country. This brings us to the discrepancy. This is the heart of the criminal case. It is. You have two competing realities from the night of August 9th. The paper reality and the video reality. Precisely. The SDNY indictment charges them with falsifying records.
And that charge exists because they created a paper reality that was simply not true. What do the physical logbooks show? The SHU logbooks for that night are filled out. They contain signatures. They contain times indicating they did their job, indicating Noel and Thomas performed their counts and their rounds. If you only looked at those paper logs, you'd see a perfectly executed by the book. Shift rounds every 30 minutes. Counts at midnight, 3am, 5am all signed. All clear.
But the video surveillance from inside the MCC tells a very different story. It proves the paper logs are fiction. Total fiction. What does the indictment say about the video? It details the footage from the internal CCTV system.
30pm round on August 9, no officer entered the tier where Epstein was housed. Not at midnight for the count. No.
00pm no.
00am no, not until the next morning.
30pm until breakfast, that entire tier is what? Abandoned. Physically abandoned? Yes. The guards stayed at the officer station, which is separate from the cells. It's separated by a locked steel door. They weren't walking the beat. They weren't Looking in windows. So the video evidence cited by the prosecution shows a gap, an eight hour gap, where there were no official eyes on Jeffrey Epstein. Let's break down that eight hour gap. We know what they weren't doing.
Yeah. What does the government's indictment say they were doing? The indictment paints this picture of just complete disengagement from their duties. So they weren't busy with other tasks or an emergency somewhere else? Not at all. The indictment actually lists their Internet browsing history from the computer at the guard desk. This is in the federal filing. Their search history. It is. The prosecutors pulled the data directly from the terminal. And what did they find?
Michael Thomas was searching for motorcycle sales and sports news. Motorcycle sales and Tovenol was on the same computer at different times searching for furniture deals. So furniture deals and motorcycle sales, while they were supposed to be guarding Jeffrey Epstein and sleeping. The indictment alleges that the surveillance video captures both guards asleep at their desks for significant portions of the night. This is the tension in the documents. It's not from a violent event.
No, it's the tension of negligence. You have this high security wing, a prisoner who had a potential suicide attempt just weeks earlier. And the guards assigned to watch him are shopping for furniture and sleeping, but they still picked up the pen. And that's the criminal act. That is the specific criminal act. They would wake up or pause their browsing and they would falsify the SHU log entries. So they're writing down 12am Count clear. 3.00am Count, clear.
They signed their names to a document they knew was false. The correctional officer's indictment is very clear on this. It's incredibly specific. It says they certified the safety of inmates they had not seen for hours. Which brings us to the morning of August 10th. The discovery.
30am this is the moment the fiction completely collapses.
30? The video shows Noel and Thomas finally getting up from the desk to perform their morning duties, specifically to serve breakfast. So they enter the tier for the first time since
30 the previous night. They unlock the door, they walk in, and this is when they find him. They find Jeffrey Epstein, unresponsive in his cell. He's in a kneeling position, suspended by a bedsheet. The immediate reaction is obviously chaos. Medical staff gets called. Right. But we need to focus on what was said in those first few minutes after the discovery. The so called hot mic moment. Exactly. The indictment and the prosecution files.
They reference a conversation that happened right there on the tier. A supervisor arrives on the scene and Tova Null is speaking to the supervisor. And according to the legal filings, Null says, quote, we did not complete the 3am or 5am rounds. He just admits it right there. It appears to be an immediate admission of procedural failure. He doesn't say someone broke in or the camera was broken. He says, we didn't do the rounds. What about Thomas?
Michael Thomas reportedly adds, we messed up, or a very similar phrase that's documented in the SDNY filing. That's a critical piece of corroboration for the prosecution. It's immense. You have the video showing they didn't do it. You have the logs they wrote saying they did do it. And then you have their own verbal admission within minutes of finding the body saying, we didn't do it. It cements the timeline of negligence.
It removes any ambiguity, any defense of maybe we checked and the camera missed it. No, they admitted they didn't check. And that admission becomes the cornerstone of the government's entire case for falsification of records. I want to zoom out from the specific actions of Nolan Thomas for a moment. We've established they were overworked, they were negligent, but they were operating inside an institution, the Metropolitan Correctional center, an institution with a known reputation. It does.
And the pinpoint documents, they really give us a glimpse into the systemic failures that allowed this to happen. We mentioned the overtime, but we have to talk about the suicide watch status. This is a huge point of contention. Epstein had been on suicide watch in July. Correct. On July 23, he was found with injuries in his cell. The pinpoint documents specifically EFT000016836 discussed this incident and there was a debate about what happened. Right.
Was it a genuine suicide attempt or was he assaulted by his cellmate at the time, Nicholas Tartiglion? Regardless of the cause, the response was to put him on suicide watch. Which means 24 hour monitoring, paper clothes, no bed sheets, constant observation. But that status was changed shortly before August n removed from suicide watch. He was sent back to the SHU and the cellmate system. What was that?
It's a standard Bureau of Prisons protocol for at risk inmates who aren't on active suicide watch. You give him a cellmate, the logic being another person in the room is a deterrent and an alarm system. And Epstein had a cellmate when he first returned to the SHU. But not on the night of August 9th. On the night of August 9th, he was alone. The records clearly show his cellmate was transferred out of the cell that day. Do we have documentation explaining why the transfer order Exists.
But the justification, the reasoning, for leaving a high profile inmate like Epstein completely alone is missing from the record. So we do not have documentation that justifies that specific decision. We just know the cellmate was moved, we know no replacement was assigned, and we know Epstein was then left alone in a cell with bedsheets, unmonickered by a cellmate, and as we've established, unmonitored by the guards. So it's like the layers of protection were peeled away one by one.
That is the pattern. First the suicide watch is removed, then the cellmate is removed. And then the final layer, the human monitoring by the guards, fails completely. It's a removal of redundancies. Security is all about redundancy. If one system fails, another one catches it. If the guard sleeps, the cellmate makes noise. If the cellmate is gone, the. The suicide watch protocols prevent access to materials. Here, every single redundancy was removed or deactivated in a very short window of time.
Let's turn to the legal fallout for Noel and Thomas. They were indicted. What were the specific federal charges? They were serious charges. Count one was conspiracy to defraud the United States. That sounds heavy. What does it mean in this context? It means that by failing to do their jobs and then lying about it, they impaired the basic function of the Bureau of Prisons. They defrauded the government of its ability to securely house an inmate. And the other counts?
Counts two through six were for falsification of records. That's under 18 USC section 1519. It makes it a felony to alter or falsify a document with the intent to impede a federal investigation. So they were facing significant prison time, potentially years in federal prison. But that is not what happened. No. They got a deal. A Deferred Prosecution Agreement. A dpa. It's essentially an agreement where the government agrees to hold off on prosecuting you if you meet certain conditions.
And the conditions for Noel and Thomas were what? They had to admit to falsifying the logs. That was the main condition. They had to admit to the lie. And there was community service. They agreed to perform hundred hours of community service. And they also agreed to cooperate fully with the Department of Justice's Inspector General investigation into Epstein. So if they did all of that, the charges would be dismissed. And eventually they were.
After they completed the terms, the case against them was dropped. From an audit perspective, this is a critical point. By offering a dpa, the Department of Justice avoided a public trial. That's exactly right. A public trial would have been a massive discovery event. What do you mean? By that, if Noel and Thomas had gone to trial, their defense attorneys would have subpoenaed everyone. They would have deposed supervisors. They would have asked questions in open court.
Questions like who ordered the mandatory overtime? Or why was the cellmate moved? Is it common practice to pencil whip the logs at mcc? Did any supervisor ever suggest it was okay to skip rounds? The DPA prevented those questions from being asked on the record. It sealed the testimony. We got their admission about the logs, but we lost the opportunity to publicly cross examine the institutional culture that allowed it to happen.
We don't have the depos of the warden about the cellmate transfer because the trial that would have demanded that deposition never took place. Let's circle back to the video evidence. We mentioned the footage showing them at the desk, but there were issues with other cameras. There were. The indictment relies heavily on the camera that showed the entry to the tier, the one pointed at the door. And that camera proved no one walked in or out. Correct.
But it didn't show the inside of the cell corridor. And certainly not the inside of the cell. And there are cameras in the SHU corridors. Yes, but their footage from that night is the subject of conflicting reports in the pinpoint database. There's documentation about lost or corrupted footage. The wrong video was preserved. That's right. In the immediate aftermath, there was a preservation order for all relevant video.
But the BOP initially preserved footage from the wrong tier or the wrong time period for one of its backup systems. And by the time they realized the mistake, they cited technical glitches, hard drive retention policies. The footage had been overwritten. So to be clear, the indictment confirms the camera on the guard desk was working perfectly. Crystal clear. We have perfect evidence of them shopping online. But the documentation for the camera is facing the actual cell corridor.
It contains inconsistencies, gaps in retention and questions about quality. So we have the video of the negligence, but we have gaps in the video of the location of the event itself. And there's one more discrepancy mentioned in the files. The three guard detail. This is a detail found in document EA00007268. It refers to a dedicated three guard security detail being proposed or recommended for high profile inmates. But on the night of August 9th, there are only two. Only Nolan Thomas.
And there is no documentation we have that explains why a recommendation for a three guard detail was ignored. Or if it was rescinded, a third guard might have changed the dynamic. It's harder for three people to tacitly agree to sleep on the job. And falsify federal records than it is for. Two, the absence of that third officer is another one of those removed redundancies. So let's try to synthesize all of this. What we're looking at is a cascade of failures. It's a perfect storm.
It's a sequence of events. And each one makes the next one more likely and more dangerous. Let's list them in order. One, the institution removes Epstein from suicide watch. Despite a recent incident that put him there. Two, his cellmate is removed, which violates the standard BOP protocol for non suicide watch monitoring of at risk inmates. Three, the unit is staffed by overworked, fatigued officers, One of whom is on a mandatory double shift.
Four, those officers then fail to conduct their duties for eight hours, Choosing to sleep and browse the Internet instead. Five, they commit a federal crime by falsifying the logs to cover up that negligence. And six, the key video evidence that could fill in the remaining gaps Is either mishandled, corrupted, or lost. It's a pattern that looks very suspicious. It looks like a conspiracy. It looks like a pattern. But we have to be absolutely precise about what the documents actually prove.
Okay, what do they prove? The documents prove gross negligence. They prove criminal falsification of records. They prove that the Bureau of Prisons failed to secure its prisoner. But what do they not prove? They do not prove a specific order from a supervisor to stop the checks. We have not found a single memo, an email, or a witness statement that says, leave Epstein alone tonight. We haven't found a payment record, a payoff. The DPA didn't reveal one.
Their cooperation with the Inspector General apparently didn't reveal one. So the paper trail really does end at that guard desk. It does. The falsified logs are the final barrier. They stand between the institutional decisions made by the BOP and the actual event inside that cell. The guards admitted we messed up. They took the blame for the gap in time.
And whether that gap was simply an opportunity for Epstein to take his own life, or if it was an opportunity that was exploited by someone else, that remains the gap in the documentary record. So we have reviewed the indictments, the logs, the plea deals and the documents establish a clear, undeniable eight hour gap. Where the federal government completely lost control of its most high profile prisoner. And in that gap, the truth of what happened in Celnon south was lost.
The system failed top to bottom. And the last two men in the chain of command signed a logbook saying everything was fine. Next time, Maxwell. Arrest. You have just heard an analysis of the official record. Every claim name and date mentioned in this episode is backed by primary source documents. You can view the original files for yourself at Epsteinfiles fm. If you value this data first approach to journalism. Please leave a five star review wherever you're listening right now.
It helps keep this investigation visible. We'll see you in the next file.