Wed Episode #2204: Internet ID: Forging The Chains Of The Digital Surveillance State

we know what it is. We're going to talk about that today. A new report shows just how huge the welfare magnet is for immigrants and how effective the pivot strategy has been. And then we're going to take a look at what the Pentagons fight with Anthropic, the company behind Claude Ai. What that fight from the Pentagon, what they really want shows us the frightening plans the Pentagon has for war with America. It's not just palanteer. Volunteer is central to it, but this is the federal government

at war with you. And we're going to take a look at the quote unquote list of the Department of Justice put out with names. It's got everybody from Elvis to Alex Jones named in the Epstein file. What is behind that trick? We'll be right back. Well, an Arizona bill would require ID checks in order to even use a weather app. Yeah, that's right, even apps that are

come pre installed on your phone. The bill would require parental permission or identity checks to open the calculator app that came with your photos your phone rather your photos as well. This is all being done in the name of protecting children. And they would classify everybody into four different age groups, adults and then three minor age groups. And even if a minor update to the terms of services or something like that is included, you'd have to

go through the whole authorization process. Yet again, let me tell you, this is not about protecting kids, as we've seen over and over again, this is about having an excuse of pretense to make sure that nobody can use the Internet that an ID and it is another pretext for the surveillance state. The surveillance state has to cancel privacy. I mean, just look at what they do with their masks. The ice agents with their masks. It's absurd. What if

they got to hide well everything, I guess. Apparently, it would create a surveillance architecture that applies to every mobile device using every mobile device user in the state of Arizona. App store providers would be required to verify every single account holder's age category and share that data with developers. We got to know this is coming out of Arizona, but there's a lot of states that have done this.

Texas has. Texas is on the first ones now so far that has been blocked in courts, and it should be blocked. Divide users into four age categories, children under thirteen, those between thirteen and sixteen, those between sixteen and eighteen, and then adults. Everybody would be put in one of these four buckets, and the Arizona Attorney General would be

tasked with creating rules to establish acceptable verification procedures. So once you establish this, once you start creating a mechanism for tracking and a permission system for using the Internet, it'll apply to politics, it'll apply to religion. There's no end of it. So they say, for anyone under eighteen, the bill mandates that their account be affiliated with a parental account. We've got to make sure the parents know

what's going on. Well, if you're under eighteen, most likely the parents are paying for the phone and paying a monthly bill. Kids don't have a job to do that, so of course they already know about that. The law doesn't specify how the parent child account affiliation would actually be verified. You know, maybe they could ask the company that they pay the bill to. It's absurd what it's happening with this, but developers be required to notify app

stores of any significant change. App stores that then be required to notify parent accounts and obtain renewed consent. The burden will fall on both of those parties, with civil penalties of up to seventy five thousand dollars per violation, and of course it would allow parents and children to sue them. Arizona joins a growing list of states pursuing app store age verification Texas, Utah, and Louisiana California. Of all past versions of these laws. The Texas law faces

an appeal after having been stopped in court. Utah and Louisiana our scheduled take effect later this year. In California's version arrives in twenty twenty seven. So we've seen this happening over and over again in the EU. They have to know everything that we are doing, and yet we expect this from the federal government. We expect it from the EU. But this is something that is happening at the state level, and really at the state level we have the ability to do something about this. That's where

you need to get involved. So the hang on just one second, having an issue here with us trying to get to my next article, but I had another one that I wanted to talk about here. But here we go. It seems to have revived. This is well evidently not. I'm going to try to take care of this thing, and we're going to take a quick break, folks, I mean really quick break, and we will be right back. Stay with us.

it could take effect. US District Judge Robert Pittman said the law is akin to a law that would require every bookstore to verify the age of every customer at the door, and for miners to require parental consent before the child or teen could enter, and require printal consent again before they could buy a book. This is the absurdity of it. But it's even worse than this, and

this article does not mention it. I looked up. I thought, well, is aris On a state that requires rental consent before they change a child's gender or before they start gaslighting them over pronouns in school. No, As a matter of fact, there's less control over what happens to your child and an Arizona public school, then there is what happens on your cell phone in Arizona. Even with this law. Of course, in Arizona, they have no parental consent required for changing pronouns.

They have a law that says, well, we really suggest that you tell the parents, but it's not a requirement that they tell the parents if they're gaslighting a child and the child now thinks they're different sex, so there's no requirement at all for that. But look at all these stringent requirements. Let me just tell you, we all know this is not about protecting kids. There's many ways that you can protect kids, and of course parents are

the key to doing that. But if they were concerned about protecting kids from perversion or sexual content or whatever, you can imagine they would do something about this gender mutilation and gas lighting that's going on in their own institutions. They're not, they're not. But again, Texas law is on hold, Utah, Louisiana, and California. Utah and Louisiana coming up this year, California

coming up next year. Meanwhile, you have in the EU you have Macron, Fred Mertz and Ursula, who's fond of lying. They want expanded speech controls, of course they do. We have to be sure that there is one single person with one account, said Macron. And if this is an AI system, if this is a BOT, or if it's organized by a big organization, that should be forbidden. Well fine, then regulate the artificial intelligence, regulate the corporations, don't regulate

the people. If you're concerned about AI masquerading at something else, because you know how dangerous that is because you do it all the time. You governments do it, so you know how dangerous that is. Well, you could very easily require ID from the artificial intelligence, for example, So you're going to identify yourself preemptively, or we'll do something about it once we find out that you're not doing it. Instead, they come after humans. Then they use that as an excuse.

It's a system where every social media user would have their identity verified by platforms and tied to a single permitted account. Anonymous speech, pseudononymous commentary, the ability to maintain separate personal and professional presences online would all effectively end. And of course they're coming after VPNs as well, virtual privacy networks. The governments want a powerful tool to identify, track and silence anybody whose speech they object to. We

see so many aspects of this. The West has descended folks into tyranny. It is pervasive and leadership of every party in every country. If you didn't see it in twenty twenty, you can still see it in this. None of them respect our individual liberties, none of them, not the US certainly, and not the EU of course, obviously, they all aspire to tyranny, and they're open about it as well, and so the question is what do we do about this. Macron defended this by characterizing free expression

online as a form of brainwashing. So when you brainwashing gaslight a kid about what sex they are, that's okay. Just don't do it online, because we don't want people passing information back and forth about narratives that were lying to them about about climate change, about the vaccines, about the pandemics, about what they're doing actually with each other. Macron invoked the Digital Services Act as a foundation for

expanded censorship across Europe. Said, this is a very important regulation because it is the first time that we've created a framework to regulate the Internet. And of course they're not going to regulate it in any way that is reasonable. They simply want to regulate it to shut up dissent and to punish dissenters and protesters. He offered a familiar list to speech categories and he wants to suppress. Of course, the first one is going to be racist speech. That's

the first refuge of these scoundrels. Then hateful speech, then anti Semitic speech. Yeah, you don't criticize Benjamin Netnaho, because you know that minority government of Israel represents all Jews, and you know there's a lot of Jews who don't like that idea. Just like I would not want to be represented by the Trump administration, they don't want to be represented by the net Yahoo administration. They disagree with their policies. These terms have no fixed legal definition that

applies uniformly across the EU member states. You know, what is hate speech? What is racism? By the way, what is anti Semitism? If you even asked that question, as Carrie pre Gene Baller found out, you get kicked off of the Religious Liberty Commission. What a joke set up by Trump. German Chancellor Fred Mertz, he's got some splanning to do, Lucy. A divide has opened up between the Europe,

between Europe and the United States, he said. Jd. Vance said this openly here at the Munich Security Conference a year ago, and he was right. The battle of cultures of Maga in the US is not ours. Freedom of speech here ends where the words spoken are directed against the government. Oh no, he said, human dignity, He means right and basic law, he said, So we have laws about what you can say and your right to free speech ends, for we say it ends, and we call

that human dignity. What cynical liars they are. You know, that's one of the key things of BF. Skinner, because this is all really about behavioral psychology, and he's really kind of the I don't know the father of behavioral psychology, but he certainly advanced it a great deal. And his book was called Beyond Freedom and Dignity, and that's where these people are. And yet that is the German cynical way of describing human dignity is the phrase that the

German governments have used to justify prosecuting speech. They prosecute speech in the name of human dignity. Imagine that they've attributed it to cover anything from insults to the Holocaust denier. So Israel always is at the forefront of this censorship, if you notice this, right, And so the question is why are they desperately pushing this? Well, I've seen that whenever somebody is desperately trying to hide some things because

they're lying to you about it. Have you noticed that they lie to you about the pandemic, They lied to you about the vaccine, they lied to you about climate change. They lie to you about the wars, they lie to you about what they're going to do. Everything that they want to censor is something that exposes those lies. So European Commissioned President Ursula fond of Lying joined the censorship chorus at the Munich Security Conference. It's their security, not

your security. Just like national security has nothing to do with the safety and the freedom and the security of Americans. It has everything to do with the security of the government and its continuity of governance, staying in their jobs, staying in office, staying in power, staying in control. It has nothing to do with our safety, nothing to do

with our security. A fond of Lying described European speech regulation is under attack from the US, so they have wielded the threats of tariffs on partners to secure preferential access and to cry the EU's digital rules as an assault on free speech. Well, because they are as unfortunate that the Trump administration, while decrying the censorship of the EU, is busy doing the same thing here, except in a more hidden and devious way. The EU's digital rules are

an assault on free speech. The DSA empowers bureaucrats to demand platforms remove content under threat of massive fines. She claimed that Europe has a long tradition of freedom of speech, and she's told the truth about that. What she doesn't say is that Ursula a fond of lying, and Fred Mertz and Emmanuel Macron the rest of these EU leaders.

After Europe has got a long tradition of free speech, their mission is to end that tradition, to destroy that, and to do it in the name of dignity and democracy. What cynical liars they are. The leaders who gathered in Munich, Writes, reclaimed the net spoke of protecting democracy while proposing tools that would let governments identify and punish dissent. They invoked free speech while demanding the power to decide what speech

is free. They claim to defend Europe while stripping Europeans of the ability to speak freely online, and they've openly declared their intention to do so for quite some time.

the constitution, due process, the bill of rights. Courts have jailed, have ruled that ICE has illegally jailed people more than forty four hundred times in just the last five months. Judges across the country have ruled the more than forty four hundred times since the start of October that the US government has illegally detained immigrants, according to Reuter's investigations

published on Saturday. Now, I know I've gotten a lot of people who have contacted me and said, no, these rights are not for illegal aliens that are here.

Extra judicial killings are all for that. Trump cheered that on the streets of the Philippines. He's cheered it, and the water is off of Venezuela. They don't care about due process, they don't care about making sure they got the right person before they even execute people. So of course they have contempt for a due process in terms of arrest. And let me just say this, there's nothing

in the Bill of Rights. There's nothing in the Declaration of Independence that says that we have these rights because we are American citizens. If that were the case, that would change your god given rights into government granted privileges. You need to understand that all you people who are out there, good good do do all this stuff. These people very illegally. Yeah, they've committed a crime. Let's make sure the punishment is proportional to it, that is not excessive.

Let's make sure that it's not unusual, and let's go through due process. Because if you let them use cruel, unusual and excessive punishment, if you let them skip due process on your fellow human beings that are out there who maybe probably are guilty, obviously guilty of committing crime. So you know, have a process for handling this and send them back to where they came from. Most importantly,

you could stop handing them out money. But Mike Johnson is that the head of the list shoving out money to people that he claims are so bad they shouldn't have any due process. Cynical again what they are doing. And so just be careful because the government that ignores the humanity of people who have committed crimes. Even if they've committed crimes, you don't ignore their humanity. That's why

the Bill rights exists. If you let them get away with that with other people, they will do that to you. They'll do that to your children, to your family. They'll do that to Americans. So again, the number of people on ice custody has ballooned to sixty eight thousand this month, seventy five percent higher than when Trump took office. Midway through twenty twenty five, the administration began pushing for daily quotas of three thousand arrests per day, with the goal

of reaching a million per year. This has led to the targeting of mostly people with no criminal records, rather than the supposedly worst of the worst that they keep saying. This has also resulted in a staggering number of arrests that judges have found later to be illegal. And it's another reason why when somebody is going through the process of getting their green card or applying for American citizenship or something, they go in and the arrest of people

in the courtrooms, well, that's low hanging fruit. That's like, hey, look I got my quota in this month. We ought to be disgusted about that. Yeah, it's like the speed trap in a town or something. It's not anything that helps us. This is a cynical abuse of power by

law enforcement, quote unquote. Since the beginning of the Trump term, immigrants have filed more than twenty two hundred Habeas corpus petitions claiming that they were held indefinitely without trial and violation of the Constitution, and at least four hundred and twenty one cases. Listen to this, more than four hundred federal judges. I can't tell you the number of times that every time something like this happens and a federal

judge slaps down these authoritarian, illegal, unconstitutional policies. Every time that happens, you see the Trump cults say, oh, that's just a Democrat judge or something. Four hundred federal judges in forty four hundred cases have ruled that their detentions were illegal. Last month, more than six thousand Habeas petitioners petitions were filed. Prior to the second Trump administration, No other month dating back to twenty ten had seen even

five hundred. Now they had six thousand. So again, well, we can't bother with following the law, says the Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, a lawyer. Let's just forget about the law. Maybe he got to have his his license revoked? Right? What did lawyers even believe that? I mean, if you get admitted to the bar and you decide that you need to just ignore the Bill Wrights and the Constitution as an elected leader, isn't that grounds for

removing your license by the bar. It should be, you know, as a matter of fact, I think they got rid of Bill Clinton. I'm just going to memory here, but I think they got rid of his license to practice law when he committed perjury. They've done that for other people. What if you break your oath to the Constitution? Is that grounds? Evidently not. In ruling last month, Chief Justice Chief Judge Patrick Schlitz of the U. S. District Court

in Minnesota, a conservative judge appointed by Bush. W. Bush, provided a list of nearly one hundred court orders that I SID violated just that month while deployed as part of Trump's Operation Metro Surge. Meanwhile, the alex Pretty shooting investigation Minnesota, the FBI has told Minnesota law enforcement, we will give you absolutely no information, will not share anything with you, and they said this is unprecedented Minnesota Bureau

of Criminal Apprehension. So the FBI formally noted this agency on Friday that it will quote not provide the BCA with access to any information or evidence that it has collected in the shooting death of Alex Pretty. While this lack of corporation is concerning and unprecedented, the BCA is committed to thorough, independent, and transparent investigations of these incidents, even if hampered by a lack of access to key information and evidence. Maybe what the FBI stands for is

fed's blocking investigation. They have done this time and again, talked about this many times. One of the most interesting ones that they blocked, well documented was the investigation of Flight eight hundred. The FBI blocked that investigation as well. And here they are blocking this investigation. Just amazing how perverted the federal government has become. Before we take a break, we've got Georgia boy eleven forty two said David forgot to verify his age. It's kind of frightening for me

to verify my age. Is then you know, you get to the point where you know when you lick in the mirror and verify your age. It's like, who is that person? I don't know who that is, but maybe that's why they kicked me off right, I didn't verify my age. I think it has something else to do with content. Malt Van Milakovich. Milton Malakovich has gifted a sub on Rumble, Thank you very much and Guard Goldsmith

Liberty Conspiracy. Good to see you, Guard. He said, the Feds are buying a warehouse in the town bordering ours and putting in an ice detention camp. They're buying warehouses all over the place. This is an insane policy when you stop and thinking about what is the purpose of this? Really, the purpose is to boast about the kinetic actions that they're doing. Look, we're tough guys, we're going to take care of this, and we got numbers that we're going

to produce to give it to you. I remember when the Vietnam War was being conducted by Robert McNamara, and it was all about his body cam ounce they're not they were right. He didn't really care about anything except how many people did we kill him? How many people of ours did they kill? That was the entire calculus. Of what they were doing. Well, we're going to take a quick break, folks, and we will be right back.

supported us on zeal. We read the names. I'll read the first name, last initial. William D. Thank you very much. We have Maryland. Let me see if this is a C or a G. That is a G, Marylyn, Carl H, Michael L. Lyndon H. Susan L. Sean S. Felicia H. Daniel C. Susan L. Again, Mary M. Gregory I and Benjamin R. Thank you very much for your support. And there were three names the other day when I mentioned checks that have been sent to us that got left off.

The sellers, Sylvia d and Kelly and Philip. Thank you so much, all of you, because that's what makes this show possible. We don't put things behind a paywall. We just trust people to support the program if they find it valuable. Let's talk a little bit about well.

banded on the platform. So if you want to link to where you can find the show, video or audio, the best way to do that is to go to Davidnight dot news.

It's the welfare magnet that the Trump administration has just nearly doubled for people who are coming in as refugees. Reports show. These are new studies that have come out. This is an article from the New American report shows that most immigrants get some form of welfare. Sixty one percent of illegal aliens get welfare. I've always said it's the welfare magnet. Stupid, It's not the wall or anything else.

It's the biggest issue. If you've got a big welfare magnet, people are going to find some way to get in. So again, a majority of immigrant households, more than fifty percent, are on welfare. Smalies in Minnesota receive some form of welfare, almost ninety percent of them. And there has been an explosion and some malies who have come in again, they're not walking across the border. You're not going to stop them with a wall. They're being incentivized by all these

different administrations. I mean, when there were no Somalies at all, before they started coming in, there was hardly any money in the refugee program. Then by the time they started coming in, they ramped it up to a couple of billion dollars and it gradually has increased until the last three years it's been six billion dollars a year now.

This is not including the welfare fraud that they've engaged in, criminal fraud for which they've not been punished for which we knew they were doing this back in twenty eighteen. It was reported on I reported on it back then, and the Trump administration didn't do anything about it. The Biden administration didn't do anything about The second Trump administration did nothing about it until you had a reporter show it to everybody. Then they got interested. But they still

haven't rounded these people up and stopped it. I mean, this is the type of thing. Or if you look at al Capone, it was the tax auditors that took him down. It was the accountants who took him down. It wasn't Elliott Ness and his untouchables, and it's not Christinoman her untouchables. The ice criminals are around there. So again, refugee funding then increased by Trump this year as they are talking about all this stuff, they're not getting rid

of the somalies. Instead, what they're doing is they're increasing the refugee fund from six billion dollars to eleven billion dollars, an eighty percent increase, nearly doubling it. And so still nothing happening with the fraud. Immigrants are a bottomless drain on taxpayer resources and they contribute virtually nothing to the fiscal health of the federal and state treasuries either. As

a matter of fact, we keep ramping this up. Fifty three percent of immigrant headed households, according to a survey that is done by cis fifty three percent. Include naturalized citizens, legal residents, and illegal aliens are using at least one major welfare program. Just thirty seven percent of American born households use a welfare program, so Americans thirty seven percent, for illegal and even legal immigrants fifty three percent. And

of course this is not counting the schools. When we were in Texas, they were building one school after the other because of all the illegal aliens coming in, all the kids that they were bringing in.

twenty seven percent for Americans. Earned income tax credit fifteen percent for foreigners, ten percent for US born illegals use welfare at a much higher rate than legal immigrants, sixty one to fifty one percent. So again it's worse for the illegals, and it's much worse for immigrants. It's worse for immigrants in general than Americans using the program, and much worse for illegals. And of course this is what

Cloward and Piven knew. Cloward and Piven said, you know, we've been trying to take down the American system using welfare, but the Americans aren't signing up for it enough. So let's bring in people from other countries that'll do it, that'll collapse it using welfare. That is the Cloward and Pivot strategy, and it's working. You know, the research shows us excluding the extensively used but less costly school lunch and breakfast program. Now they're going to talk about school

lunch and breakfast program. They're not going to talk about schools in general, the massive cost of schools, the buildings, the teachers, the buses, everything about it.

speak English. And so Children on the Nutrition Program of Women, Infants in Children shows that forty seven percent of immigrant households versus thirty four percent of American households use at

least one of the remaining programs. The numbers show that fifty nine percent of non citizen headed households are on welfare, fifty three percent of immigrant headed households are twenty one percent of illegal and legal immigrant households get cash assistance, forty four and thirty two percent, respectively, get food assistants, forty four and thirty eight percent go on Medicaid, and bottom line, when you start looking at these comparative numbers,

you're finding that twenty to fifty percent higher use of welfare, subsidies and things like that for people who were not American born, and they're not even counting the schools. For those here less than a decade, the rate is forty eight percent, but for those who have here more than a decade, it goes up to fifty four percent. They're

gaining the system even more after they come. Eighty six percent of all immigrant households have at least one worker, compared with just seventy four percent of US born households. Income determines welfare eligibility, so many low wage workers are on welfare. Immigrant households without children, however, and those with higher incomes and those that are headed by well educated immigrants, tend to be more likely to use welfare than the US born counterparts. So it's not just well, these people

are poor, they're not making any money. No, the people who have, people who are making higher incomes, people have a higher education, but who are immigrants are more likely to use the welfare. It's a cultural thing. The question is how immigrants who are forbidden from receiving welfare get so much of it while they collect benefits because of their anchor baby kids. The prohibition excluded some programs. Most legal immigrants have lived here long enough to qualify for welfare.

States provide their own welfare, and naturalized immigrants can, of course jump on the dole of a minute they take the oath of citizenship. The big problem with immigrants on welfare isn't just the money that they collect, it's the tax revenue that they don't contribute. The federal government spends roughly one trillion dollars every year collectively on the above programs,

which represents a substantial share of the federal budget. And again that's not even counting the free quote unquote education, which an education which, by the way, trashes American values. Right. It's not enough that we have to pay property taxes and can't own homes because of the cost of the schools. What the schools are doing is they are doing everything they can to make the kids hate their own bodies,

but also to hate their own country. And so that's very easy to do with foreigners coming in, and then you have Somalia, the welfare bonanza that's there. Cis warned that the high rate of welfare use should not be seen as immigrants who are gaming the system, unless you're talking about Somalia, and then they said it truly is a organized gaming of the system, major welfare fraud operations in which almost ninety percent of Somalis get some form

of welfare. Ninety percent they speak little, if any English, They are virtually illiterate, and they are a sinkhole for tax dollars. Even without all the fraud, almost forty percent of them live below the poverty line. Fifty two percent of kids and Somali immigrant homes live in poverty. The strongest predictors of poverty are low education and a lack

of English language ability. And so virtually all native Minnesotans speak English very well, but fifty eight percent of working age Somalis do not speak English, forty percent don't have a high school diploma. Twenty one percent of working age Somali men are unemployed. I put this in context. Antonine Scolia was speaking abroad when he was talking about the

importance of culture and really what it is. I want you to hear what he had to say about this, that it really does give you an understanding why the Somalis are not ever going to fit in here if they don't learn to speak English.

England and I felt at home. There is no doubt that American culture. American common culture, which nobody has to belong to, originates with English culture, and that includes Shakespeare and includes nursery rhymes that we all know and that we use as examples. That's our common culture. And I think the Framers recognized that. And diversity is fine, but diversity does not make a nation.

in London going through free museums. It was It's a great time, but that was a key thing, the culture, the language, you know, just as he points out Shakespeare, the rest of this stuff is amazing to see it. And even though we have a you know, American culture is different from the UK's culture, there's been a divergence.

There's still that baseline that's there. And he didn't mention, interestingly enough, our common law, you know, going Supreme Court judge, a lot of this stuff It traces back to the magnet Carter and traces back when you look at things like habeas corpus, for example, locking people up without having any law that allows you to do that. You know, that goes back to dury qualification cases that we talked about many times here. You know, the the ordeal of

Edwin Bushnell. William Penn, who was in the UK before he came to America and you know, started the state there Pennsylvania with the Quakers set that up. They were meeting and had their Quaker church in violation of the law. Church of England was the only one that you were allowed to go to, but they did it anyway. They locked the doors to their church building, they held their church services on the steps. Then they arrested William Penn,

and the jury didn't agree with that law. There should not be a prohibition as to how people worship God, and so they let him go, and the judge was furious. It was clear that he had violated the law. But the jury looked at the law and they said that

law is awful. We're going to nullify it. And so the judge, in his anger, locked up the foreman and the assistant foreman and he didn't have any reason to do that, and so they stayed in jail for a while, like some of these migrants that were there, and then their lawyer said, show me the law habeas corpus. Showed me the body of law that these people violated for you to lock them up, and he had to let them go. That was a very important trom because it

established habeas corpus. It also established jury nullification. These types of traditions that go back for a very long time. All of these things are being overturned. And that's why it is necessary for them to overturn our cultures, why it's necessary for them to bring in people who a don't speak English and b don't care to ever learn to speak English. They don't have anything to do with what this country is about. And that's the bottom line.

And these types of totalitarian authoritarian quote unquote enforcement is backfiring big time on all this. It's going to push a lot of people towards the open border position because a lot of people realize just how dangerous this is and we should not be supporting it in any way, shape or form. It is a dagger that is aimed at our chest, not just the people who are here illegally.

If you have police that are giving cart Blanc to just walk down the street, if they think that you are engaged in criminal activity, to just kill you, as Trump cheered when dou Terte was doing that in the Philippines. If you do that here in America, we are all in jeopardy. That's why this is so important that we get this right. Well, some people obviously are above the law, and I guess we can put into that category Bear

and Monsanto. Bear stock has soared after a settlement a mere ten billion dollars on current and future roundup cancer lawsuits. Ten billion dollar settlement and to settle current and future cancer lawsuits. So this will save them from many potential claims that could be filed over a twenty year period.

So regardless of how many people they kill with their life as it, regardless of how people get non Hodgkins lymphoma, they now know that they don't have to pay more than this ten billion dollars, which is chicken feed to them. Bear bought Monsanto for sixty billion dollars, and this stuff was already on the table, and they rightly calculated that

they wouldn't have to pay for these lawsuits. Barrett also announced a three billion dollars settlement of existing US cases in which former round Up users blamed the herbicide for causing their non Hodgkins lymphoma. Yeah, that killed our dog. Our neighbor liked to use weed treatment on their yard and we would lock him up, but he escaped and repeatedly and he got over there and also killed a friend of ours who worked for us with a video store.

I died from this, and I remember when our dog was going through it, and there was a report on the radio where they're talking about people who worked agricultural workers working on farms and how they were getting this high rate of non Hodgkins lymphoma. That's when we put two and two together. The company has paid about ten billion dollars to settle most of these round Up lawsuits they were pending as of twenty twenty, but they fail

to get a settlement covering future cases. So now they've been given immunity from paying for this regardless of how many people and they give this to. And you know, glyph has said is so widely used that it now permeates our food supply. Really times, by the way, let me just say this while we're talking about cancer. You're not helpless about this kind of stuff. Go to RNC store dot com. They've got the books that help you

to understand what's going on with this stuff. One that I would recommend highly is one by G. Edward Griffin, a man of the utmost intelligence and integrity. A world without cancer, and you can get apricot seeds vitamin B seventeen, very effective. One of the best things you can do to protect yourself because folks, the government is not going to protect you. They're going to allow big rich corporations like Bear and Moncento, They're going to allow them to

poison our food with cancer causing chemicals. So one of the things that you know to do is go to rncstore dot com. And by the way, you can save ten percent if you use a code night. And I don't care if anybody criticizes me and thinks that this is I'm saying this because of money. I'm not saying it because of money. We don't get that much from it.

Children's Health Defense that he founded. So they said the model state that they're trying to get to is Idaho, and twenty twenty five, Idaho enacted in a law that prohibits businesses and school from requiring customers, employees, and students to receive vaccines or other medical procedures. They call it the Idaho Medical Freedom Act. And folks, this is absolutely essential.

How did we get to this point? Well, just to review quickly, we had two months before nine to eleven, we had their first germ game, which is called Dark Winter. One week after nine to eleven, they had the Anthracs attack. A couple of people were killed with anthracs. Two months after that, they put out model State legislation, Model State Emergency Powers Act. That's where they get the power. They set up the state power to mandate this kind of stuff,

and then Trump writes them checks to bribe them. To do that twenty years later after they practiced it on an annual basis. So we've got to do this at the state level. We've got to stop this authority to mandate vaccines. They've done it in Idaho, and this is a coalition of different organizations that are working to do this at the state level. This is more important than what is happening at HHS. HHS can come in and change the vaccine schedule and then when these guys at

the top leave, then they'll change it right back. The lasting change is at the state level. That's why the FEDS did that with their germ games, you know, Dark Winter nine to eleven, anthrax attack, boom. Here's your legislation, give this power to yourself at the state level. We need to remove that at the state level. This is one of the things that needs to be done, a very important thing. So because that past it really showed

that this is possible. So our goal is to take this Idaho's Medical Freedom Act as many states as possible across the US. Children's Self Defense finds vaccine mandates and medical mandates to be reprehensible and we are honored to be a part of this coalition fighting to end forced medical procedures, to end medical mandates and vaccine mandates for all Americans. We should all aspire to that. And again, you know, trying to fix this in Washington is not

going to last for long. If it works at all, with the next regime change, it'll come right back for the rubber weitts to road is at the state level. That's why these people put in the regulations at the state level. And of course of being fought by the pediatricians and some organization called American Families for Vaccines. I bet if you look that up, I didn't have time to do that. I bet there. Well. I know the American Academy of Pediatrics is heavily funded by big pharmaceutical companies,

but I bet this American Family is for vaccines. That sounds like an AstroTurf organization, if ever there was one. The Idaho Medical Freedom Act says in part that a school quote shall not mandate a medical intervention for any person to attend, to enter campus or buildings, or to be employed. They said, every state in the country requires

vaccines for school attendance. Some allow exemptions for religious or philosophical reasons, while all permit medical exemptions fartificials set in twenty twenty five, they would be removing all vaccine mandates, but the goal has met resistance in the state legislature. Well, we're going to take a quick break, but before we do, I we'll to talk a little bit about what's going on with AI in terms of entertainment. And actually, this

is one area where I think it's very positive. You know, when you look at the creation of images and movies and things like that, it can be very dangerous in terms of its ability to audit us, in terms of its ability to manipulate our opinions, in terms of pacifying us. You know, when you think about some of the movies like Arthur Right, which is basically based on PG Woadehouse's a series of Jeeves and Wooster Right, a couple of

care characters out of stories of that and so. But you probably are more familiar with certainly familiar with Arthur and what you see over and over again with a stereotype right is you've got this upper class twit who has a very knowledgeable butler who does everything for him, and before you know, the guy can't do anything at all for himself. I thought it's kind of interesting that that was really kind of aspired to. Early on with the Internet, there was a kind of a search engine

or something. Wasn't jeeves actually called back. Of course, they didn't have the chops, they didn't have the technology actually pull it off. Now you actually do have little jeeves out there, the AI agents and things like that, and people are getting pacified on it. So all of that is a danger. However, there's just been an update from Bite Dance there Sea Dance two point zero. I haven't used it, Lance hasn't used it, but stuff that I've seen coming out of it truly is amazing. And I've

seen some posts on social media. One guy says, I've been working in film for about thirty years, and he goes, this is wonderful because I can do the script writing, I can do the cinematography, I can do all you know, I can do every aspect everything. I can do it myself. And it opens up the creative door for a lot of people, because frankly, Hollywood doesn't have a story to

tell right. Truth and beauty left Hollywood a long, long, long time ago, and it's gotten very ugly in the interim there, and so it is creating because it's coming out of China. Of course, China doesn't have any interest at all in preserving intellectual property. It's kind of like, yeah, make this. As a matter of fact, they almost did. They are somebody like them did a video that basically taunted Disney, because Disney has been one of the most

aggressive company in terms of protecting their intellectual property. I remember there was a daycare center that had some artists come in and they painted Disney characters on the wall right for the little kids and everything. Disney sought them out this one. It's not a franchise or anything, but they sought them out to make an example of them and hit them with lawyers, and they got picked up

by the newspaper. Hannah Barbera sent their own artists and drew Fred Flintstone and the Jetsons and other characters like that on the wall for them to cover up the Disney stuff. But it's also used, and it's been used against me multiple times to try to silence us on political issues. The first and most obvious one was The Most Wonderful Life, which kind of added insult injury because they didn't even have a legitimate copyright. That's one of

the things that Disney has done. Disney has extended their copyrights. They've gone to Congress and gotten special legislation just for themselves to extend copyrights over and over and over again, many times past the life of the people who created this stuff, and they've been very aggressive with that. Well, you know, we look at It's a wonderful life. That was in public domain. That's how it became popular. It

was a failure when it first came out. Then with it being the public domain, it got to be very popular. I did the one hundredth anniversary of the Federal Reserve, of course I did. It's a wonderful lie because there were a lot of parallels to the banker there. Mister Potter was actually based on JP Morgan in terms of many different aspects and things they did, organizing runs against

other banks and stuff like that. So I used that, but that was just it was used as fair use because there was a lot of commentary about the creation of the Federal Reserve, what people in Congress were saying at the time, how it would be abused, and the fact that it was abused that way, and even the numbers that they were talking about, the numbers that mister Potter was using to try to entice Bailey in order

to join him. You know, the salary figures that he's throung out, the cost of the houses and things that there was a lot in a movie like that that you could draw in terms of the negative aspects of the Federal Reserve has had. Well, they took that down. They said, that's a copyright violation. Well where did I get the clips that I used for that? I got them off of YouTube. Same people took me down for a copyright violation. The entire movie had been up for years.

The entire movie had had over a million views on YouTube, and they took down my thing, which was covered under fair use. Even if it had a valid copyright, it would have been covered under fair use. It wasn't about the copyright issue at all. It was about what I was saying about the Federal Reserve. So I'm not really friendly to this, And of course the Hitchcock people did the same thing. We're going to do another mcguffin, though he doesn't own the term mcguffin. That's not owned by Hitchcock,

and he doesn't own the music either. If the copyright rules have been there, you wouldn't have had a Hitchcock theme either. That was written by another composer long before they ever picked that up and used it. So Disney is at the center of this. And look at this. For people who are listening to this, I'll just describe the scene and then i'll play it for you. They have Arnold Schwarzenegger, RoboCop and Predator and the three of

them are fighting. And then you have a little Mickey Mouse coming out in a suit, smoking a cigar like a wealthy ceo, and he holds up a sign and you know, to tell them that you cease and desist type of thing, and the three of them stomp him into the ground.

So they've got Tom Cruise as Austin Powers. They've got a Gwyneth Paltrow. There's a sidekick. Actually, they do have Michael Myers, who did Austin Powers. They have him, and that what I think is interesting is that you can these characters are so well defined and so well captured that you can identify who these actors are even though they are in a different role. They got Kevin Spacey is the villain. Was his name Evil or something? Doctor Evil?

And his sidekick is Danny Divina Divino. And then that's even Spielberg in there as well. And they not only captured their voice, they captured their mannerisms and everything in this. Just take a look at this.

Disney franchises. Disney is very upset about it, but a lot of people are looking at this and saying, well, that's basically it for the movie business, because Hollywood has been out of ideas it's just been licensing and copyright.

was the best example, because it is real. We're gonna take a quick break, folks, we'll be right.

they were very well done. For example, they had Superman versus Wolverine, and so you had Henry Cavell as a Superman versus what was it, Hugh Jackson as Wolverine, and I mean that was very, very convincing.

meaning none at all, just bite Epstein's toxicity. Steve Bannon stood by him, indicate the texts a very chummy relationship, and of course he was going to fix that relationship for him. Mid afternoon, late June twenty nineteen, Steve Bannon sent Epstein an excited series of texts. Dude, he said, is this real? Tell me this is real? Epstein had

just texted him. A headline from Miami Herald reported that victims of Epstein's sexual abuse had lost a court battle through nullifi, a decade old agreement that protected him from prosecution for those crimes. Think about that. Here you got Steve Bannon giving him high fives for getting away with his sexual abuse of women and children. That's the guy that you're following. If you're listening to this guy truly

is amazing. And so you know it's we see this not just some Steve Bannon, but from so many people here. Pam Bondi actually ran for office talking about how she was going to be tough on sexual predators.

have to worry about it. Then rebuild your image as a philanthropist. Oh there you go, Steve Bennon advising Jeffrey Epstein. That was five months after the Miami Herald series exposed how prosecutors had ignored evidence of his crimes, And so three million pages have revealed for the first time the extent of Bannon's efforts to advise Epstein when many of his friends were abandoning him, and the six months before

Epstein was arrested and charged. Bannon's name appears nearly every day in these files because the two men were constantly exchanging texts. So again, just remember, Bannon betrayed MAGA with the we build the Wall stuff. He got convicted of that, he went to jail for that, Trump pardoned him, and then he gets out and he betrays morals, decency reprehensibly aiding Epstein. He's going to do pr for him, telling lies for him, and all this is now He's using

this notoriety. He knows that he can do whatever he wishes. And the Maga cult will still pay attention to him, just like they do to Trump. So he's going to use this notoriety to push his film they's putting together, and no penalty at all for him. Again, when you look at people like Bannon, Dershwitz, Trump, Bondi, it's disgusting to see what they are getting away with. So one person writes and says saying, it's about how the elites

and the intelligence services are inextricably leaked. Who knew, right, Yeah, I think we always knew that was the case. Well, Bannon told Epstein that Trump should be removed via the twenty fifth Amendment during his first term. Think about that. Now he's pushing, as I point out the other day, a third term. So you have the twenty fifth Amendment says you can how to remove a present that is not fit for office mentally. That was in twenty eighteen.

Bannon want to use the twenty fifth Amendment against Trump, and now he's talking about a third term, which is prohibited by the twenty second Amendment. But he's going to find ways to ignore the twenty second Amendment and keep Trump in forever, so ten years before he wants him to run again for a third term. He was saying the guy wasn't mentally fit for office. Can you trust anything that Steve Bannon says. You'd be a fool to

trust anything that he has to say. And so Margie Taylor Green says, Steve Bannon went to jail for Trump, but back on one to one twenty nineteen, he was texting with Epstein about the twenty fifth Amendment. There's no excuse for having such a friendly relationship with Epstein post conviction. Let me just say, Margie Taylor Green is wrong about that. Steve Bannon didn't go to jail for Trump. He went to jail because of his hubris. I'm not going to

go testify the January sixth people. I don't have to. I'm too big to do that. Well, you'll go to jail. If you don't do that, you can go testify and not say anything. You can plead the fifth. But he was too arrogant, too filled with hubris to do that. Maga Hopeful. In Texas, Don Huffines is under a lot of pressure because he purchased the Zorro wrench that was owned by Epstein seventy six hundred acre property and to make Mexico. He set up a corporation to buy it.

This guy Don Hefines, who has a lot of money, is running for office in Texas and Republicans in Texas are attacking it. Why did you buy that? Why are you why you have that ranch? Are you going to open it up for investigations? Again, this is the place where he was going to be seating his DNA to the world. In a lot of really horrible allegations about

what was going on there. So the DOJ may have at least only two percent of the Epstein files that they've got based on previous information of what they said that they had. You know, a lot of people are saying, what's going to go on with this investigation? We're ever going to have an investigation of this stuff? Even the big Lebowski, even the dude is questioning cash matel on this.

UK based broadcaster Channel four News reported the internal emails seen by its journalist show federal investigators expected to process between twenty and forty terabytes of data sees from Epstein's properties, including his Florida mansion, his New York townhouse, and his private island. The broadcaster added that these emails between investigators discussed the data totaling up to fifty terabytes from the

earliest stages back in June of twenty twenty. Another internal email from twenty twenty five, the report continued, officials said that they were looking at approximately fourteen and a half terabytes of archived data. So the most recent tranch of three and a half million Epstein documents totaled more than three hundred gigabytes, only got two percent of what they were talking about that they had, and that was just last year. They claimed that six million pages were identified,

including duplicates. They released over three million, said the broadcaster, which is Channel four News in the UK. Both those numbers are tiny compared to the amount collected. According to today's emails, many files are too large to open. There are many files that are completely invisible to us, said one email. Another investigator said, imagine if we had seized the papers from approximately one hundred thousand filing cabinets, then

that all just got dumped in one big pile. Documents that had multiple parts stapled together got separated, and then any of those documents it was larger than one hundred pages, couldn't be opened. Well, that's what we have. So they're pushing that back and forth. So a couple of things about this. First of all, noticed that in the UK they're far more concerned about this than here in America. There have actually been people who have been fired, people

who have lost their jobs. A man formerly known as Prince Andrew. They've had a lot of consequences in the UK and in Europe, basically very little consequences, certainly none for politicians here in the United States, not for Trump, not for the Clintons, not for anybody else along those lines. And how are they manipulating this? It truly is amazing

to see this latest tactic that they've done. They put out a big list, as some people emailed me and said, hey, look, Alex Jones is on the list, and Tucker Carlson, all this kind of suff They have Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Elvis Cher, Alex Jones and got all these entertainers right, and Tucker Carlson. But the bottom line is is that this goes on and on and on this list. It's just anybody that they said anything at all about, not anybody that they had a dealing with. And what this

really is, folks, this is Pam Bondi and her haystack approach. Right. If you want to find the needle, what she does just starts throwing pile after pile of hay right, one bail after the other. This is her way of bailing out Trump massive amounts of hay to hide the needle, and so I've seen government officials do this in the past. Right, they can't if they have to release the information. They give you so much information, so much of it that is irrelevant. They use that as a way to hide

what they don't want you to see. And that's exactly what Pam Bondi is doing.

Go get him, Massy. That's coming from John Clees. He knows a joke when he sees it. And this stuff is a disgusting joke. They got Thomas Massey right there next to Glaine Maxwell. You know, yeah, they're talking about Thomas Massey. Well, this is a absolutely pointless cash Betel right underneath him, Ron Paul over and over again, Ronald Reagan and then Brett Ratner, who is the guy who directed Millennia, a friend of Epstein and somebody who had

been accused multiple times of sexual harassment. And so again it's just another cover up tactic by the Queen of smear, Tam Bondi, the Queen of deception, just keep going. Marjorie Taylor Green has listed in there as well hundreds of names, politicians, celebrities, of historical figures to see individuals and others. Again, we're supposed to believe that there's something some connection between Elvis

and Jeffrey Epstein. So the paper trail bombshell moment that Epstein's former butler tried to sell the Little Black Book. The butler tried to do it, but again the FBI stopped him. The FBI, the FEDS who were blocking investigation. So he tried. He thought it was somebody that wanted to report on this, and he was going to sell them Epstein's Little Black Book of Names, real names for

fifty thousand dollars. They hand him the money and then they arrest the guy, and then they cover up the information. Alfredo Rodriguez, who worked for the pedophile in his Palm Beach mansion, thought that he was dealing with the victim's lawyer when he was actually talking to the FBI. So rather than use this to help the victims rather than use this to expose the perpetrators, he was handing it to the federal agency that's been tasked to block the investigation.

In the covert forty five minute recording from November two thousand and nine, Rodriguez claims the book listed underage girls allegedly procured by Glaine Maxwell. And again, the victims lawyers would want this kind of information, but not the FBI.

Ah pathetic they are. It's truly amazing. It took place two years after the FBI demanded that he turned this over, that any documents that he might have obtained while he was working for Epstein, And of course they're demanding that they be turned over, not because they want to put that out, but because they want to cover it up,

same way they're doing with the shootings in Minnesota. He also alleged that Glaine would go to Eastern company countries in Europe to find girls for Epstein, you know, and also the kind of girls that Donald Trump prefers, right Eastern European women. So he admitted that he stole the book while working for Epstein between two thousand and four

and two thousand and five. He alleged that he once saw Maxwell running a database filled with images of miners who were nude, of course, and so he said, there were naked girls from Sweden, from Romania, from Czechoslovakia, from Brazil, all miners, all them young girls, teenagers, many of them with braces. When he asked who created the book, he said, well, Epstein himself. Rodriguez claimed that he kept the book as an insurance policy because he feared Epstein would make him

disappear or harm him. He was arrested by the FBI for obstruction, and they said the book would be extremely useful in investigating and prosecuting the case, but they covered it up. The current whereabouts of the book remains unknown. They got rid of it, that's the FBI, just like the flight information about Flight eight hundred, the radar tapes and things like that. Rodriguez was jailed in twenty twelve

for eighteen months. Now listen to this. He got eighteen months, which was the same sentence that alex Azar, who was later picked to be Trump's labor secretary, he served the same amount of time for that having Jeffrey Epstein's book and trying to sell it to somebody. He served the same amount of time as Jeffrey Epstein served for the crimes that he did. Jeffrey Epstein served eighteen months. Now what I don't know as well, not this guy got

day release like Epstein did. Epstein would come back and just sleep in the cell like the town drunk on Mayberry. But this guy got the same sentence as Jeffrey Epstein. Just think about that. This is how corrupt our government is. That's the key thing, the key takeaway from all this stuff. He died at the age of sixty from cancer. So again same sentence, but not clear where the night he got released every single day, just like Jeffrey Epstein did.

So when we look at the Hillary Clinton has got in, has it gotten involved in this? As a matter of fact, she was interviewed by the BBC in the BBC in terms of let's see, let me get up here, yes, in this one here. The BBC asked her some questions about this, and she said, oh, it's all Trump. Right.

tell them everything about it. After they had to. They brought charges of contempt against them, just like they did against Steve Bannon, and that's what got them to testify. Now she's like, oh, yeah, we just want to tell everybody everything about it, and we're all above board. Of course, Trump is saying he has absolutely nothing to do with any of this stuff, even though he and Clinton partied

with US for years, Trump for fifteen years. Marjorie Taylor Green says Trump yelled at her not to release the Epstein files. He said, my friends will get hurt. Yeah, you know, friends like the Clinton's. Actually, but he's playing that left right, red blue game. Now we're getting pressure from the speaker take your name off of this discharge petition, and we're like, we're talking about the Epstein files. This is the ultimate promise. This is the ultimate way to

provide transparency, said Marjorie Tayler Green. This is the ultimate way to expose a whole criminal cabal of rich, powerful elites that I believe control everything. And so that's her perspective on all this stuff. When is she going to come to the realization that if this is a rich, powerful cabal of pedophiles that control everything and they're friends of Donald Trump, when she's going to connect the dots to say, well, therefore, therefore he's made of wood, right,

Therefore Trump is a part of the cabal. They're his friends, he said, they're his friends. He's protecting the powerful elite pedophile rings that you believe exist and have believed exist, and yet he wants to protect them. They're as friends, and yet you do not want to attribute that to him. We talk about Trump delusion syndrome. It truly is amazing. So she said, Trump is fighting it. He's fighting it.

He's yelling at me through all this stuff again, you know, it says it came out that he was the one who reported Jeffrey Epstein. Well, we knew that all along, right, But it wasn't because Trump was upset about what Epstein was doing to women and children. It was because he was upset because they were fighting over a piece of real estate. That's when he got they had the fight, that's when he turned him in. It wasn't that he cared about the women and children. Trump was right there

along with him the entire time. And so he says, Marjorie, my friends will get hurt. That's what she's saying. She said, that's it. That' said, I mean, that's it, because they're all in here. They're all in there, every billionaire, the heads of state, Larry Summers, Peter Teel, they're all in there, said Marjorie Taller. Green does that tell you something about Trump. Has she ever heard that expression, show me your friends and I'll tell you who you are. She doesn't seem

to really get that, does she. If all his friends are the evil pedal elite, then I can tell you that's who this guy is as a matter of fact. And so you know, when we I think Marjorie Taller Green may be clueless as to what's going on, but Catherine Austin Fitz is not. She understands exactly what it's happening.

and ejecting its booster rocket. So by shutting down Jeffrey Epstein's operation, you know, whether he's still alive or not, it doesn't matter. They're simply ejecting the booster rocket and moving up the recent Department of Justice can't prosecute the Epstein network. Is because the Epstein Network is running the government Donald Trump, the Department of Justice, they are the Epstein Network.

And nobody has been more connected to Jeffrey Epstein than Donald Trump has. And it is the Trump Epstein administration or regime.

They have deceived him. They're evil, and it's all the people around Jeffrey Epstein and they're all Trump's friends and everything. But Trump doesn't have anything to do with it. Trump's not responsible for the people that he picked and had running his regime. He's not responsible for any of this stuff.

And just as you were saying, Travis, we've said that before about the anger that the Trump administration, people like Warpete have of these people who put out the video that said you have a responsibility as a member of the armed forces to not follow illegal orders. The Trump administration could have easily come out and said we haven't given any illegal orders. And to their shame, Mark Kelly and the other person that said, I can't remember her name,

she's a retired CIA when they're oppressed. So what illegal orders? As Trump put out, they couldn't think of any couldn't think of any. I mean, I can't think of any legal orders he's put out. In terms of the Venezuela stuff, every aspect of it has been illegal and criminal by US law, by constitutional law, by Pentagon rules and that they have and by international law as well. They've broken all of those things. What did they do that's legal?

I can't think of a single thing, And yet they didn't defend themselves by saying, well, we didn't do anything illegal. That would have been the easiest thing to do. Instead, this is a thing of their own making. You know, you can look at the trump Epstein files, and you can actually call them the Trumpenstein because this is a Frankenstein monster of his own making, because he decided that he was going to try to cover it up at all costs, and basically he got it all over himself.

It was a pile of excrement that he not only stepped in, but he jumped up and down and until he splashed it all over himself. Well, there may be no consequences for Trump or Lutnick or the people in the Trump regime, but when we look at other people, they are getting a lot of consequences. And I think it's interesting to see this because you see who is in the pecking order, who's getting punished and who isn't. It's kind of like who you're allowed to talk about

and who a you're not allowed to talk about. That's who's running the thing. This is another indication that Trump and his people are the ones who are running this because they're not paying any penalty for this. And yet we have people all over the place, prominent figures, people who are very successful, very rich, are paying a big price. One guy, a physician, longevity expert, he's had to resign because he was writing text messages that were very crude

to Epstein, so he has been purged. Interestingly enough, this guy was going to be hired by Barry Weiss at CBS as a consultant, and they still haven't said that they're not going to keep him as a consultant. Then, of course we got the Sultan Suliam, the Sultan of Slime, who was talking about he loved the torture video that Epstein gave him. Epstein told the Sultan in one twenty thirteen email, you were one of my most trusted friends in the very sense of the word. You have never

let me down. Thank you, my friend. I am off to sample a fresh female Russian at my yacht. That's what he said. This is also the guy who's talking about torture videos. Then you got Sarah Ferguson, who was simple the wife of the man who was formerly known as Prince Andrew, and she's had to shut down her charity because of the taint of Epstein. She had gotten a fifteen thousand pounds loan to payoff debts from him.

At one point in time, she said, I abhorp pedophilia and any sexual abuse of children, and I know that this was a gigantic era of judgment on my behalf, but hey, I needed the money. At the time she got that, it was known that he was a pedophile, but she goes to him for money anyway. And then you got Larry Summers, of course, the former Harvard University president. He was the Treasury secretary under Bill Clinton another you know Clinton's and Larry Summers and Epstein, all these people.

He was on the board. By the way of Open AI. This is another sleazy cesspool, Sam Altman, who first time I saw Sam Altman, he was out there hawking this big eyeball thing that you look into and he would get your biometric identity looking at your retina. And so you let him create a database and he would give you a little bit of crypto coin and some crypto thing that he just invented. What a totally worthless thing.

This guy's going around shopping around trying to create a global database of everybody from biometric stuff that he can then sell to governments. And he was the one who worked his way in and took over open Ai, which was supposed to be a not for profit organization. He's involved in all this. So again Larry Summers is on the board of Open AI and senior roles in Clinton and Obama administrations. He advised Biden on economics. Joined the board of Open AI in twenty twenty three, advocating a

light regulatory approach to AI. See he's on the same page as Donald Trump, Peter Teel, all these rest of these people, they want AI to have no restrictions on it whatsoever. We've got a bunch of people from Norway, former Secretary General of the Council of Europe, former Prime Minister of Norway. And then there's also a couple that got money and they have some criminal charges being brought against them that said Norway. You got a guy named

Brad Karp, no relation to volunteer crook. Carp thanked Epstein for hosting him for a once in a lifetime event. Karp was told by Epstein, You're always welcome, and there's going to be many more nights of this type of thing. So you look at this and this guy gets canceled because of an email saying we had a once in a lifetime night at that party. And yet Trump partied with him for fifteen years and there's been no consequences for Donald Trump. You got people involved in the UN

people like that have been fired. Former French cultural minister and his daughter have been investigated for tax fraud because of things that have come out from that. And of course in the UK, Peter Mandelsson a former US ambassador or ambassador to the US from the UK, and there was some financial information, insider trading information that he gave to Epstein. So not only did he get thrown out of politics because of the stinch of Epstein, but he's

looking at criminal prosecutions that are there. And not only him, but the guy that put him in as ambassador, Morgan McSweeney. This is a second degree connection here. This guy put him in in spite of some things that had come out in the past about his connections with Epstein. And so Morgan McSweeney is out and people are looking at Kir Starmer and saying Kir Starmer needs to resign. So

in the UK, this is in other countries. Anybody that's even a couple of degrees is separated from this are having effects with it, but not the Clinton's not Donald Trump, right, So Bill Clinton, whatever he does, that's fine, that just happened. Hillary Clinton doesn't have any penalties with that either, and she says, I never met Jeffrey Epstein. I met Glenne Maxwallwoy. She we have these global Clinton initiatives, and she was

there once and I met her. And turns out the senior editor for CNN called her on that in the BBC interview. He said, well, she was actually an honored guest there, invited as an honor. She didn't just show up and stand in a line and shake Hillary Clinton's hands. She was an honored speaker and guest at that. So this is the way they're trying to whitewash this. But the interesting thing is there's been no penalty for Trump or Bill Clinton, for Hillary Clinton, for Milonia, in spite

of the close connections of that. Even Milania the director of her film with somebody who was close to Jeffrey Epstein, George Mitchell, a former US senator from Maine. He was also Bill Clinton's envoy to Northern Ireland. He was mentioned three times, sorry at three hundred times in this and so now he is persona nograda, and so we're seeing this over and over again. And yet the dog that did not bark is the penalties for Trump, the Trump's and the Clintons, they are there. I think that is very,

very toning. So we've seen people like the chief lawyer, chief council for Goldman Sachs. She's had to resign because of connections with us. We've seen the co owner of the New York Giants being questioned, Steve Tish, and I don't think there's gonna be anything with that. The young fellow is so corrupt they probably see that as a badge of honor. And then this guy, Casey Wasserman, who had a talent agency. He sent an email to Glenn Maxwell saying he'd like to see her in a tight

leather outfit. I think normal people like to see her in a straight jacket, not this guy. But the bottom line is there's no consequences for Trump, none for Bill Clinton, none for Hillary, none for Millennia or the director of her film. No consequences for Alan Drschowitz, No consequences for Alex Acosta, who defended him and worked out the deals for him and continued to defend him. No consequences for Bill Barr and the connections that his family has had

for the longest time. No consequences for Lucky Lutnik and no consequences for Pam Bondy or Cash Ptel. That is the reality of what we're looking at with us, folks. We're going to take a quick break and we come back and want to talk a little bit about the Pentagon and their fight within Tropic Anthropic and claud Ai and what it tells us really about the Pentagon. We will be right back. Stay with us.

to it. I don't know why they thought that Palaeer would be ethical, but they were concerned about this raid in Venezuela where Maduro was kidnapped, and so they asked Palanteer, did you use our song software because we have an agreement within our country company that we're not going to have it used to make weapons. We've got certain guard guardrails that we want for. We don't want it to be a part of autonomous weapons. We don't want to use it for mass surveillance of Americans and other things

like that, which of course that is a stock in trade. Volunteer, but yeah, volunteer gave them an indication that was what was going on, and so they started talks with Pentagon people. Pentagon people got furious, you're telling us that you don't want your stuff use for mass surveillance of Americans, you don't want to use it for autonomous killer robots. How dare you? We're going to put you on a list and that we reserve for foreign adversaries, was called a

supply chain risk list. So if you're on that that list, then anybody who supplies anything to the Pentagon has to make sure that they don't use any thing that you provide. So they're going to treat them as if they were from China or something like that. And the Anthropic doesn't have a lot of business that they do with a Pentagon.

They've got a two hundred million dollar contract, but they have revenue of over fourteen billion, so that's really only about one and a half percent of their revenue comes directly from the Pentagon. However, this could have a big

impact on them. I want you to think about the fact that we have a Pentagon that is so helppent on autonomous killer robots, so help bent on domestic surveillance that they will try to put out a business anybody that doesn't join them in that, and there's actually calling axios. This is one guy who is a senior official at the Pentagon said it'll be an enormous pain to disentangle from them, and we're going to make sure they pay

a price. We're forcing our hand on this, and Sean Parnell of course saying our nation requires that our partners be willing to help our war fighters win in any fight, regardless of whether it's just or not, regardless of whether it's legal or not, regardless of whether it is aimed

domestically at Americans. You know, we want those autonomous killer robots and we want the domestic surveillance, and so Anthropic was saying, we do not want to We have certain guardrails that we have set up for our corporation and we don't want an ethical concerns and we don't want those violated, and then we won't sell those out. So that type of a company. And look, I'm not going

to make them a hero. They've got They've been pretty woke in terms of things that they have been caught doing in the past, and Elon Musk immediately call them out on that. But I kind of say, you know, the example that they gave was he had some researchers who said, gave it a hypothetical and situation, So you have how many lives of white men are equivalent to the life of one black woman? Is that one black

woman is more important than twenty three white men. I don't know what the entire context of that was, but certainly there's been indications that Anthropic and Claude are completely woke in terms of what they're doing. I just got to say, as offensive as that is, and as much as I dislike that, that pales in comparison to a pentagon that wants to use artificial intelligence for domestic surveillance. That pales in comparison to a Pentagon that demands economists,

killer robots. That's what I'm most concerned about. Yeah, the other stuff is bad, but you know, we can handle that. This is a whole new level of problem. And I got to say to Elon Musk, why are you not concerned about that? And the people that are out there as well. It's not just is groc AI, but it's also Google and the rest of them out there who are doing this. Facebook and the rest of them. So they've taken a lot of criticism for that, but I think what it really tells us is where the Pentagon

is headed. Pentagon officials and Anthropic executives have been locked in contentious negotiations over how the military can use AI, particularly in surveillance and weapons development, you know, surveillance without warrants, all that kind of stuff. Pentagon sees mass surveillance of Americans as its core mission. So when they talk about national security, as I said before, just understand they're talking about their job security. They're talking about continuity at government.

They're not talking about safety and peace for Americans. So they're terms of that they have in terms internally in the company, they agree that they are not going to be used for the design of weapons, that they're not going to be used for domestic surveillance, that they're not going to facilitate violence or malicious cyber operations. But that's basically the mission statement of the Pentagon and the federal

government in general. And so again, defense officials insist the military AI tools must be available for all lawful purposes, even though they have some gray areas that rigid rules cannot anticipate, you know, like murdering shipwrecked people. You know, what happened in Venezuela is not a gray area. It's a violation of black letter law. That's what Pete and the Pentagon want. Thank you for joining us.

everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com