Wed 8May24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show. The clock strikes thirteen. It's Wednesday, the eighth of May of Our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to take a quick look at the news, failing technology everywhere, and the grandiose plan of some globalist elites crashing and burning. That's right, we don't have to fear these people.

They can't accomplish any of this stuff without our fear. And by the way, even when they've got all the money in the world, they can't make a lot of these things happen. So we're going to take a look at that. Well's it going to take a look at the rising resistance to the Who's Pandemic Treaty, or they sometimes called it the Pandemic Accord. We have forty nine, all forty nine Republican senators have now signed on with Senator Ron Johnson, and they're asking Biden to do something. Wait a minute,

don't they understand their power under the Constitution. Yeah, we'll talk about that. We'll be right back. Well, we're going to get in today with

some light looks at a lot of phony garbage coming from our governments and from the ruling elite. Let's begin with China. We've got a Chinese zoo kind to pass off dogs that they have dyed black and white as pandas. Here's the Those are chow chouts, and of course they're cute. Died like that. It got some people angry because they had died them that way, but they were actually just trying to pander to the zoo audience because they didn't have

any pandas the official said, the die was harmless. They dressed the dogs that way because they just didn't have any pandas. So I guess we could call them furries. They really are furraser, closer to Ferris than these delusional kids that we are pandering to in the school. So this is not the first time China has done this. We remember back in twenty thirteen they dressed

up a Tibetan mastiff as a lion. It's even less believable, I think, And of course everybody soon realized that they were lying, but not the dog was not lying, but just as equally absurd as Saudi Arabia's big gnome. And remember we talked about this. This was a very good example of the kind of dark vision, a smart city out in the middle of the desert. You know, one hundred and five miles long, as tall as a skyscraper, the entire length. Let's pack everybody into this thing where we

can watch and control them. I mean it is like something out We've seen this over and over again, one sci fi thing after the Logan's run. You know, don't go outside the city because there's nothing at all out there, and you can't get anywhere because it's out in the middle of the desert. Really kind of a prison type of thing. Well, good news is is that. Well, first, let me show you the dystopian dream of this head chopping crown prints, or as Jeryl Slentti calls him, the clown

prints Mohammed ben Salmon. For too long, humanity has existed within dysfunctional and polluted cities that ignore nature. I think their government is dysfunctioning. Revolution in civilization is taking place. Imagine a traditional city and consolidating its footprint, designing

to protect and enhance nature. The line will be home to nine million residents and will be built with a footprint of just thirty four square kilometers, and we are designing it to provide a healthier, more sustainable quality of life.

The line's communities are organized in three dimensions. Residents have access to all their daily needs within five minute walk neighborhoods, and the line's infrastructure makes it possible to travel end to end in twenty minutes with no need for cars, resulting in zero carbon emissions by leveraging AI technology, services are autonomous, saving you

time. Zerot It's a zero economists leading architl. The line is five hundred meters tall, two hundred meters wide, one hundred and seventy kilometers long, and housed within an elegant mirror glass facade. Intelligent solutions create efficiency and year round temperate microclimate with natural ventilation. Energy and water supplies are one hundred percent

renewable. The line is designed as a series of unis unique communities offering a wealth of amenities, providing equitable views and immediate access to the surrounding nature, with forty percent of the world accessible within six hours, at the heart of the globe's key trade routes. Yeah, but you won't be able to get there, and communities to thrive like nothing on earth seen before. Yeah, the line the line that delivers new wonders for the world. Just remove that

in and you got it. The lie. It's another grandiose plan of their gigantic egos and their desire to control everyone and everything. Yeah, all the buzzwords of zero and autonomous and all the rest of stuff. The lie. The lie. It was going to be one hundred and five mile long skyscraper, and now they've cut it back ninety eight percent to one point five miles. They can't even get that built. It's absolutely up athetic. This is what comes from central planning. And this is why, folks, we should

not fear them. We could beat them easily, but especially with God on our side, we really don't have to worry about these goliaths out there, their paper tigers. Folks don't tremble in fear. As a matter of fact, when we get to politics. I almost started with the politics today. The fear and trembling of all these people about Trump. Is Trump going to make it? And that is the thing that we need to be afraid of. The fear is what we need to fear. That's one thing FDR got

right. He didn't get too much right, but he said when he said, the only thing we have to fear is fear itself. He was right about that. It was fear itself that made us victims of what Trump did in twenty twenty, what Biden did in twenty twenty one and thereafter with a pandemic, and it is fear itself. It gets us to put all of our hopes, aspirations, money and efforts and everything to the presidency and the fact that we've got to have the right guy there or all hope is lost.

I am sick and tired of hearing this. I'm starting to get kind of old here. And I can think back to every single election, and I've heard the same story every This is the most important event of our life, the most important election of our life, and on and on. You know who tells you that. The media, left and right, mainstream and alternative. They'll tell you this is the most important election of your lifetime.

It is not, folks. You know, the most important election of your lifetime is going to be the sheriff in your local town, or the city councilors or other things like that. That's a lot more important. We'll give you examples of that. And Rumble Junk Silver said they should have DKA create their background music seriously, David, you could create a better track in your sleep. Yeah, and but of course it is kind of just it is uh, you know, this is this this awful music to go with an

awful idea. But now here's where they are at this point, the future of NIOM, which is why Mohammed Ben Solomon calls it is not looking too good, even after they cut it down by ninety eight percent. Saudi Arabia's plans for the line have hit a surprising twist. Instead of moving forward, they seem to be taking a step back, closed one hundred and five miles to just one point four to nine miles, So the Saudi Prince Dream project

is still far from the success. While Saudi Arabia has adjusted its plans for the line, Originally they wanted to build a five hundred meter tall, mirrored linear city stretching one hundred and seventy kilometers across the desert, accommodating nine million people. However, now they're aiming to construct only two point four kilometers of it by twenty thirty, with less than three hundred thousand residents moving in. This decision has led to some workers being let go by at least one contractor

on the site. According to a document seen by Bloomberg, despite the cutbacks, building even this small portion of the line presents a huge engineering challenge. It involves constructing two towering skyscrapers, each five hundred meters tall, similar to New York's one World Trade Center, stretching sideways for two point four kilometers in the middle of the desert. Despite Saudi Arabia's decision to scale back plans for

the line, progress hasn't halted entirely. Yeah. Well, you know, considering the fact that Saudi Arabia is not responsible for their wealth, we are. We created the need with our machines for the fuel that we found in the desert. We discovered the fuel in the desert, we extracted it, we transported it, we refined it, we used it for our machines, and then we gave them all the money. Other than that phenomenal wealth,

which they're not able to manage. They can't even I mean, there's plenty of people who could probably build something like this, but this thing is being conducted like the Three Stooges Construction Company. We got mularium curly out the woo and it's a it's absolutely a joke. What is even happening to the one and a half mile scaled down nightmare? So costs have soared, Sloppy construction setbacks, mountains. It's even worse than that, says a Wall Street drum

for example, the UH. It comes with a staggering cost. Officially, NEO was budgeted at five hundred billion dollars. Well, Saudi's got lots and lots of money, so that's no problem, right, except they really had not paid anybody to do the design and the calculation, so they really know what it is. But still five hundred billion dollars outside of the limitless fiat currency that comes out of the federal government. To anybody else, that's pretty

big. That's half of their federal budget in a year. Half of their federal budget. So just the first one and a half miles of the line will cost one hundred billion, and so it would easily clear the entire easily clear two trillion dollars if they were to build it out. I think it'd be much more than that. Actually, they said that's bigger than the gross domestic product of Brazil. You see, the emperor not only doesn't have any clothes, you've got these sheets and stuff. He's got no clue what he's

doing, and the construction has been disjointed and haphazard. The line's foundation. Listen to this. This is why I say this is absolutely lunatic. They can't manage anything. They're not industrial power, and they don't even have the intelligence to go out and hire somebody who could do it right. Because they started building the foundation years before they had a design. They didn't know where it was going to go or what the building was going to be, but

they wanted to build the foundation. Why because this is to please the emperor who has no clothes. So the architects are still working on the design. They didn't have any idea what the above ground structure is going to be, but they started building a foundation. Really why because they wanted to show progress to the clown prints. You got to please that guy, right, And

this is why these people will fail. They will fail as a socialist and the central planners always fail because it's always about politics, it's always about virtue signaling, it's never about substance. These people are out there like the energy secretary, demanding that we get rid of all of our appliances and buy new more expensive appliances that are less efficient to put on a grid that they're in the process of shutting down. We can stop these people, folks. This

is what I'm going to tell you. Maybe we could get Gavin Newsome and Muhammad bin Selman on for a round table on failure. You know, yeah, Gavin Newsom built a line bungled things worse the light rail or the giant prison city. Yeah. Yeah. Gavin Newsom built his straight project out in

the desert. Sixteen hundred feet of light rail I talked about yesterday. It doesn't It's out in the middle of the desert and it's only sixteen hundred feet and it takes you what about five minutes to walk that and there's nothing on either end of it. So it's a bridge from nowhere to nowhere on a Thursday. As let's say that guy, But that's become kind of a meme in our family. I allowed to get direction from Raleigh to Raleigh on a

Thursday. Well, you can go from nowhere to nowhere and the desert there in California. And I ran through the calculations, Yester. I compared it to the construction of the interstate system and the cost and the amount of time that took. I think the amount of time it took was relative at the pace that it's going two thousand times slower. I think the cost was forty

seven thousand times higher. But maybe I got those two numbers reversed. That might be one of them is two thousand times more the other is forty seven thousand times more. They're depending on the cost per mile or the time per mile for them to construct that. So they start building the foundation before they even have a design for the above ground structure because they want to please him. And then the architects decided, well, that but we want it in

a different place. Oh no, So what difference does it make because they built the foundation before they designed the zuperstructure there. So now they have reduced it two one and a half miles. And the Wall Street Journal they said less than three hundred thousand. Wall Street Journal says less than two hundred thousand people there instead of millions of resident several million residents, only two hundred thousand.

Meanwhile, they're spending five billion dollars just to build the housing for the construction workers to go back and forth in the desert and to move the sand around they're going to build this thing on the sand. But not even these

were designed with much foresight. It seems the community that is home to neomes, engineers, and administrative workers already needs to be demolished because more revisions mean that they have decided now to run the line through the place where they built their headquarters of the housing and everything for the engineers and the workers and the

administrators. So they built the housing for the construction workers. Now they've changed it yet again and they're gonna have to tear that down because it's now going to go through that area. But it gets worse as they're just reacting.

There's no planning with any of this stuff. Elsewhere along the line, workers are currently digging an enormous four hundred and fifty acre pit that's fifty feet below sea level for the construction of a marina, and a comical turn of events, according to the Wall Street Journal, the veritable mountain of all the dirt that they excavated was dumped right on top of where a waterway was supposed to

be built. What we have here is failure to communicate. So they're going to have to dig out a waterway, but instead this other area where they did the marina. They dumped the sand on the area where they're going to have to dig it out for the waterway, have to painstakingly re excavate the huge pile of dirt and move it somewhere else. A literal example of project designers digging themselves into a hole. That's what I'm saying these people the failure

should says the average Saudi IQ seems to be seventy six. Did you find that on a source somewhere you did? He's nodding his head. Yes, that's hard to believe. Perhaps this has something to do with their decision making. Well, best show that having lots of money doesn't make you smarter. Having lots of power doesn't make you smarter either. We can see that in Washington, can't we. And then you have this from the great Elon Musk

and Tesla. His self driving Tesla almost crashed headlong into a police car, and he put the video up that he was taking of it. I made it silent because there is a great deal of explicatives and this as he nearly as I add on a with a police car, and what I found to be most interesting, they didn't even talk of he didn't even talk about it in this post. It decides it's going to pass this cyclist, and it decides it's going to pass this cyclist by going across a double yellow line,

which is there because it's a curve and you can't see around it. So a double yellow line on a curve, and the tesla decides that it will take that opportunity to go around the cyclist. I thought these things were not very aggressive. I thought their big problem was that they'd set forever at like a four way stop because they didn't want to take the initiative to make the first move. And so you know, I guess they've made them a little

bit more aggressive. So here he is taking pictures of it. You got the ford camera, the rear camera, and then his view from the seat here and it's going to try to pass a cyclist, almost hits the cop head on. There's okay, there's a cyclist up there. He's got a red circle around it, and from his seat he also sees the computer animation of what I think is their hair, goes around the crow op op up there comes the cop. Okay pulls it back over and the cop flashes his

light at him. You know, the little lights in the grill, and then puts a brake on and he says, well, I thought he was gonna pull me over. So yeah, that's uh. Now, why is this very important? Well, because see there's a big experiment going on on the roads and you're a part of it. You know, these driverless cars, these driverless trucks that they're gonna let loose in Texas. Of course that's a different company, but stakes are much higher when you've got a fully loaded

semi trailer eighty pounds and nobody is driving it except the computer. And they're gonna do that in Texas, just like they have put some of these things in and you know, just a tootle around in the city and they've created tremendous mess in California. But anyway, he was paying attention and he grabbed the wheel. Now one of the most terrific drives I've had with full self driving yet FSD. Yeah, I made They'll come up with a different acronym

for that. Important to be alert with FSD. I took over and pulled it back to safety, he said. And so this is why the regulators are concerned about this. If he hadn't been setting there filming it and oh, you know, grabs it turns it off. If he hadn't been doing that, if he had been playing with his video games or something like. We saw that human driver that was in the uber when she when the uber ran over that homeless woman who was jaywalking with a shopping cart and didn't even

slow down. Then you don't have that much time to react, and so it isn't self driving. All of that is a lie. As Steve Wozniak, who's one of the very first people to get the Tesla set, he said, I love my Tesla, but don't use the self driving thing that is trying to kill you. Came pretty close, didn't it. And so they just it doesn't matter. They're going to do these experiments on the road and you will be a part of that experiment whether you like it or not.

And the government is not going to push back and shut these things down. There's some pushback now because they don't like some of the things that Elon Musk is doing with Twitter. The FBI and the CIA are enemies of the American people. This is an article from the Mesa's Institute, and we're going to talk about that when we come back, but first we're going to take a very quick break and we'll be right back. You're listening to the David

Knight Show. By the way, we are going to have the third hour. I think it'll be an interesting interview. We have some people who specialize in getting people a secondary passport, helping them to immigrate to another country, that type of thing, and we'll take a look at it. They are

governments don't like that, and they're trying to make it more expensive. I want to talk to these guys and see if they've got something there for people who don't have that much money but would like to have a different place to try to escape to. We looked at this back in the nineties. As I said, we went to New Zealand and we realized at that point in time that I'm too much embedded in America. I'd never be happy anywhere else.

Need to stay here and fight. There was another aspect of it, though, that I we continue to think about for a while, and that is residential ambiguity. You know, sometimes there is a lot of people will go to the sovereign citizen, not a whole lot of people. Some people go to the sovereign citizen route. I think that is. I know that that is a big antagonism to the system which does not operate on the rule of law. I think it's kind of pointless to argue rule of law to

the courts over sovereign citizenship, over the income tax. They will do what they wish. We have a lawless government, so even if the law is on your side, doesn't matter. I knew so many tax protesters when I was in the Libertarian Party that had been sent to jail. As a matter of fact, Peter Schiff's father, Irwin Shift, was there at many of

the meetings at the time. He had gone to jail as a tax protester, and he would show up reading his transcripts and stuff like that, and it's like, yeah, that's they're not You're right, but they don't care. They don't care about the rule of law. But there is another thing, and that is if you're not a citizen, they treat you differently. And that's true even at a state level. If you are not a resident of a city or state, brother you're out of state, they'll treat you

differently. And usually sometimes it's worse, depending on but usually it's they don't treat you as badly as they treat their own citizens in the state. And that's especially true of governments. And so if you've got what I call residential ambiguity, yeah, you are a citizen of somewhere else. And so wherever

you are, you got two citizenships. Well you know, if you're in country A, but you've also got a citizen where you are citizen, but you're also got a citizenship and country B, then you you know, I'm a citizen of country B, not this one. Even better if you're living in country C, and you can show them Country A, R Country B. So maybe that's what they're doing. Always curious to when they gone back to me to see what they have to say. So we're going to have

them on the third hour. And one of the reasons that you need to be concerned about this, of course, is because of our government enemy of the people. They don't even try to hide it anymore, the FBI CIA.

There was an article, long article about the FBI's programs, co Intel program and CIA chaos, and it was looking at the nineteen sixties and Charles Manson and how they believed that he was being used by the CIA and the FBI to discredit hippie movement because the hippie movement was anti war, and I can certainly buy into that. There's good evidence of that. This guy,

by the way, spent decades writing this book. After he started getting into it, it's like, well that doesn't add up, and he starts doing more and more research. If that is the case, should another example of our government funding and supporting both sides of a war, which we've seen them

do over and over again in foreign countries. You know, they were pushing feminism, they were pushing the drugs, they were pushing this, CIA was pushing the LSD and you know, happy camper van or whatever I can't remember what kisi and is a merry band of pranksters or something like going across the country, you know, spreading the good news of LSD. They were behind all that stuff. They created the LSD stuff. And then and I don't think it was well, this guy out of hand, let's do something.

But they also created the feminist movement and things like that as well. And so there are on both sides of even the cultural war domestically. But mesus is this is Ryan mcmacon. So's the FBI and the CIA are enemies of the American people. This is a kind of a straight up economic organization, and it kind of is a sign of the times that we live in that

an organization that's fundamentally about economics would say something like this. It was the kind of stuff that we would say forty years ago in the Libertarian Party, and we would say, we need to abolish the IRS, we need to abolish these other agencies and stuff like that, and you know, we just get eye rolls from any reporters who are there. You guys are off the wall. You know that it was way too early for that, not too early for us. It was like, what are we waiting for? Let's

let's get rid of them. And that was foty years ago. Now respectable economic organizations are talking about that. I think that in and of itself is newsworthy. But the first sentence begins where I began the show with yesterday, complaining about the culture of secrecy, because folks, a culture of secrecy is an evil dark occult, because that's what it means. A cult means hidden. What do these people have to hide? Well, the evil dark things

that they're doing, they don't want to bring them into the light. And he says, any human agency that operates within a culture of secrecy, without oversight, without accountability, will operate a outside the rule of the law, b outside of moral restraints, and c outside of ethical constraints. And he's

exactly right. So if you got a secret cult like the FBI, the CIA, national security just in general, everything that's you know, all of this, and it began with the FBI and the CIA and these NSA and stuff right after you know, World War two, everything is secret? Well why because it's national security? But now everything is secret, and well I we go out as as a reporter talking to people about well, you know, there's there's been reports that you just got approval for this new machine at

the TSA. Are you guys going to be putting it here at this airport? I can't talk about that. That's I can't talk about that. It's like, wait, everybody knows what this machine is. The details are out there. You can't say whether you're going to put it in at this airport or not. Come on, you know, but everything is a secret, right, But what it does destroys the law, morality, and ethics to have these dark, secretive occultic organizations. The CIA, the FBI, and

the NSA are examples of the agencies that are accountable to no one. And Technocratcy said, like it that way, Just pouring the money and leave them alone. And as we see with these programs that the FBI has done. And you know, I just think it's funny that the CIA, FBI had its co Intel Pro program counter intelligence program co Intel Pro, and CIA had its Operation Chaos. Tells you what they wanted. That was back in the

sixties. That was when you had Get Smart, Get Smart, the spoof of the spy stuff with Don Adams and it was written by Buck Henry and mel Brooks with writers on this thing, and they were spoofing, but they were also telling you what the government wanted you to hear as well, I

think because it was interesting. Agents Smart and ninety nine worked for control and the bad guys were called Chaos. Wait a minute, the CIA called themselves chaos because that's what they were after, and then the control comes in after that. So the CIA, the FBI, the NSA are examples of unaccountable

organizations. The CIA's chief Technology Officer Nand Mulchandani recently addressed a gathering of top tech and government officials in Washington where you talked about a total technocratic makeover of the agency. See, these people are the ones who are behind the technocracy. The techniocratic age was what is the big new Verzenski called it this trilateral

globalist that they elevated to run the Carter presidency. And he said, we are between two ages, and the coming age is the technocratic age, and we're going to know what you want to do before you do it. We're going to know everything about you, monitor everything about you, predict what you're going to do. They call that now anticipatory intelligence, and it's run by these same organizations here that other AI. Anticipatory intelligence. We're looking at transforming

every single part of what the agency does. He said, the commitment to integrating AI into its core operations. And did I not put that on here? I had a piece of paper. Yeah, I didn't bring it out a piece of paper. We just got a thing from Texas tag there. The whole stuff they put tolls all over Austin is one of the many reasons I wanted to get out of there. The other things a kitty genital mutilation

sanctuary, now fighting even the state government that's Austin. Not to mention the climate, but the tolls everywhere that they're putting in, taking forever to build them, costing the world to build them, creating endless traffic jams while they take their time building them. And then we keep getting these messages. And we just got another one, you know, threatening us. Here's a three dollars toll supposedly that we rode on. We haven't been there for two years,

okay, and so haven't lived there for two years. But they sent us a notice. They threatened us with late charges because we had not paid it, additional charges because we had not signed up and give them all of our information on the internet, so because they had to deal with us by mail, even more charges of that. So you know, we're talking about ten fifteen dollars here with this thing for something we never did, I said, you know, So Karen called them up and said, you know,

we haven't lived there for two years and this is total garbage. I want to see the picture you've got. Oh well, let me look. And as always, and this has happened to us several times, they go back and it's like, well, never mind, it's a different car, the license tag is off by a number, and you know, so they're automated license plate readers and ticket pushers made a mistake, and you know, it's just amazing. Now. The reason I mentioned that is because what do you

see from the CIA, the FBI, and the NSA CI especially. We're going to put AI into our core operations. Everything we do is going to be based on AI. It's going to be the backbone. What we do here are AI tools, everything from field operations to analytical and support functions. And of course they plan on doing that with the IRS as well. And so what could possibly go wrong with it? Well, exactly what we see with the Texas toll thing, which, by the way, you know,

I like that about Tennessee. We were the state that didn't have any tolls and Governor Bill Lee, bless his heart, is pushing real hard to get tolls in. And let me tell you that the toll roads that are being run by foreign corporations in most cases, as a matter of fact, the

person that Karen had to talk to was from India barely spoke English. So you know, this is a globalist plan to have these foreign toll companies control our infrastructure, And whenever you see a Republican politician pushing toll roads, mark that politician like Bill Lee, mark him. You know when he starts doing that. Where he's coming from, saw the same thing happen. But Tom till Us in North Carolina brought in the first toll roads. What is He's

one of the biggest globalist North Republican senators there is. And of course he did that when he was Speaker of the House. They hand picked him, moved him over the guy who had been the House, who had been the minority leader for a long time, an honest guy that I knew, and they picked Tom till Us over him. When they got the majority for the first time since the Civil War in response to Obama two years after they all voted for Obama said we don't want any of that, and everything went Republican

except for the congressional offices. They put this guy in as speaker and he was on the fact and he did the toll road stuff and boom, you know, next thing you know, he's running for us and he's been there ever since. So Mark people like that, Mark people like go lead. Bringing in Tennessee was one of only fourteen states that didn't have toll roads. He's working really hard. He calls them listen to this. He calls them choice lanes. Oh, then then they get you, and that really gets

me going choice lanes. The CIA's venture capital firm, Inktel, invests in promising companies to aid in this artificial intelligence process. The Inktel portfolio has swelled to over three hundred companies now, most of which are involved in AI. And of course they created Incutel at the time where the Internet was about to go big in the nineteen nineties, when the hardware started to get up to speed where they could start to do pictures and things like that. At that

point they created Inctel. They went public for the first time with the venture capital firm, and they started giving money to people like Zuckerberg and others. You know, they funded people that would compete with each other, but all of them would work with the CIA. They wanted to fund the Internet, they wanted to fund social media companies so that they can control both of those things. And of course all of them folded into geospatial intelligence. Now they're

focused on AI. And now they've got over three hundred companies, almost all

of them AI. Now the reason that mc meecon is talking about this is because he watched this three hour program between Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson, and they talked about a wide variety of things, but they did get into the CIA and the deep state and stuff like that to some degree, and he says, what I want to highlight here, however, it is how remarkable it is that two major media figures, Rogan and Carlson, are announcing to

their millions of listeners and readers that organizations like the CIA and the FBI are despicable agencies committed to undermining the legal and constitutional institutions of the United States. This is long overdue. Well, it's long overdue because these people who know Rogan and Carlson, they're not leading opinion makers, they're following, and the fact that everybody knows this now and so they have to say it in order

to not lose credibility. It's gotten to the point where even though Tucker Carlson could mock and make fun of people who talked about nine to eleven and all the lunacy of that, which has every bit as lunatic as the magic bullet of the JFK assassination the collapsing Building seven that wasn't hit and all the rest of this stuff. He would make fun of him. You know, they asked me these questions like, you know, what's the melting point of steel?

And how can a building collapse in free follow anything? These people are idiots. He would constantly mock it. Never took any of that stuff back, never never told us when or why he had his epiphany. They are essentially there to connect with the audience, to keep their credentials there. That's why they're talking about it. But fine, better late than ever, better that they talk about but understand that they're limited hangout, always have been,

always will be. Tucker's daddy worked for the CIA. He worked for the propaganda arm of the CIA. Voice of America. Tucker applied to the CIA as Putin through shade on him and said, you wanted to be in it, didn't you? But they only hire smart people. Remember that. What

a dick anyway. Libertarians know all this, says Roy mcmacon, And they've observed for decades the breed of small government conservatives who one minute claim the government can't do anything right, and then the next minute they're simping for heroic CIA and FBI agents. Is there anybody like that that we know, like Donald Trump? Right? Isn't that what Donald Trump does? Oh? The government, they can't do anything. Right. Oh, but what heroes we have

with these people? People like this have long since checked their critical thinking skills at the door. But he says that's not to say the leftists are guiltless as well. The left in twenty twenty four has rarely met a regime spook that it didn't like. They've now put them on as their commentators everywhere. Last month, the New York Times said, quote, the deep state is actually kind of awesome. Well, that's they should know, because they're part

of it. The job of opposing these contemptible enemies of freedom at America's intelligence agencies, especially the FBI, CIA, NSA, falls the minority of Americans who actually care about law and human rights enough to seek true restraints on regime

power. Those of us in this minority must never miss an opportunity to despair, briage, to doubt, to question, to generally express loathing for these organizations and for every single agent and employee at these agencies who collects the tax payer funded salary, including the daddy of Tucker Carlson, and including Tucker Carlson who covered for the pharmaceutical people who are paying him twenty five million a year. I saw Sean Annity. He's just put up his mansion on Long Island

for like nineteen million or something. He's leaving for Florida, and so you know he's going to sell one of his multimillion dollar homes there. These people, where'd they get their money? They got their money selling Trump sugar water. Sugar water, that's what Alex called it. Sugar water kool aid, you know, like jonestown kool aid that you inject instead of drinking. They make lots of money. Alex made a lot of money selling that. Alex

made a lot of money selling fear. Alex made a lot of money selling riots with January the sixth. Anyway, Harry Truman actually wrote an op ed piece in the Washington Post, and their response was to bury it at the back of the paper. And then the CIA came out and said he didn't write that. Somebody else wrote that for him and put his name on it. And then he came out and said, no, I did write that, and he doubled down on it. But here's what he had to say

to the first case. He said, for some time, I've been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from his original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy making arm of the government. By the way, the said line, CIA goes for peace talks in Gaza. You want to who the real government is? The CIA. They're the ones who started the wars. They run the coups, and imagine they go over there and say, well, we would like for you to do this and

this, or we might remove you. That's the way these people are. I mean, Joe Biden can't find he can't find his way off the stage. He's not running this stuff. So who's running it? Well, you got some Democrats there, but it's really the CIA he's running it. You had some Democrat operatives, but ultimately the CIA is running it. They're the ones who are going around and run the peace talks one way or the other. So this has led to trouble, says Harry Truman. Said Harry Truman

and may have compounded our difficulties in several explosive areas. I've never had any thought that when I set up the CIA that it would be injected into peace time cloak and dagger operations. You mean, like even spying on Americans without a search warrant like we just had Trader Johnson. Do not only expand the time period, but expand the scope and the people that they could use to do this anyway, So the Washington Post buried it as op ed piece,

put it on page a eleven. The editor did, this, is the president right writing an op ed piece? No big deal, let's just put it in the back of the thing. Then the CIA director Alan Dulles lied and claimed that Truman had been quite astounded when he saw his own article, and that the whole thing was the work of a Trump aid and a Truman aide, and Truman didn't know. But then, uh he in other words, is he going to retract it over his over what he had to say?

And he was not. He was a former president at the time. But still that's not worthy. You're going to bury it in the back of the paper. And so he said it was not intended to operate. Then he wrote another he says it was the CIA was not intended to operate as an international agency engaged in strange activities. That's what he said, he said, if I'd known what was going to happen, I never would have created the CIA, or he created the NSA with an executive order as well.

Uh so that's ry Macon says, what about those strange activities? What is he talking about? Is he just talking about asassinations and coup attempts and things like that, or is it also things like mk ultra, as he points out, you know, which was running at that time. Even by the late nineteen fifties, they had mk ultra, the mind control experiments, LSD

and other drugs and things like that. The CIA was known to drug its victims against their will, such as seven black inmates in Kentucky who were fed double triple and Q quadruple doses of LSD for seventy seven straight days. Wow. See that also brings up it. Some people will take it lose their mind, you know. Other people they take it over and over again. It might have a chumulative effect or it might not have a chemoative effect.

That's one of the things that when we talk about the injections, you'd ever know how it's going to react with people. Some people would have an immediate reaction, some people would die right away before they were vaccinated. In other words, because they didn't count you as being vaccinated until you'd had your shot number two thirty days later. If you died between your first shot and before

you could get your second shot, oh you weren't vaccinated. As a matter of fact, they had to be two weeks after your second shot before you were considered to be vaccinated. So if you died at any point between your first shot and two weeks after your second shot, you're listed as somebody who

died unvaccinated. These are the kind of games that they play. But when we talk about these scientists who are looking at the astounding health effects of these vaccines and making pronouncements like well, I think within three to five years, everybody who even got one shot is going to be dead. I don't think you can say that just because of things like this. You got seven inmates

given double, triple and quadruple doses for seventy seven days of LSD. If they're not stark, raving mad by the end of yeah, that's the difference in individual metabolism or something. Frank Olsen, of course, we've always talked about him. They say did a they did a documentary I think called Wormwood or something. But I read the book that's put together by his family and how they gave him secret doses of LSD. He confronted them on it.

He was going to be a whistleblower. They wound up defenestrating him, throwing him out of a window in New York. CIA faced some scrutiny in the wake of the Vietnam War, yet the agency has had hardly been reformed by the time the US's War on Terror was launched in late two thousand and one. That didn't affect them at all. They came roaring back. Even the Faiza Act, which was the result of the Church Committee hearings. They used that as a tool to spy on Americans with a search warrant. They always

use all this stuff for their own advantages. Just like the guy who was the one who came up with the euphanism for terror torture rather interrogation. He was watching the Frank Church Committee hearings and he said, he's a lawyer. He says, these guys need a good lawyer. They sure do. For the kind of stuff they do, you better believe they do. So he got in there. He became the Chief Council. He came up with that

lie that it was enhanced interrogation, and of course they're torturing people. The lies that what they got them to say while they're torturing them were lies, and they used that to lie us into the I Rock War, and then Trump promoted her to the head of the CIA. CIA returned to illegal medical torture two thousand and one, assuming that had ever stopped with new medical experiments

on regime prisoners. Documents uncovered by the ACLU show that the CIA doctors are still used to provide a veneer of scientific legitimacy to CIA torture programs in the age of vaccine passports. This alliance between doctors and the CIA alarm any defender of human rights. The CIA let nine to eleven happen right under its nose. Now here's where I have a big disagreement with Ryan mcmacon no. I think that was perhaps one of their most successful lines, and I think it

was tied. As I've said over and over again, it was the second shoe to drop. They happened together dark Winter and the model legislation sent out to the States and the Germ Games for twenty years and the second shoe to drop, after the three buildings that were hit by two planes. There was another shoe to drop twenty years later, and that was the fake pandemic and all these vaccine passports and all the rest of this stuff. CIA did not

fail with nine to eleven. It was their biggest success, the devil's biggest victorious to make people think that he doesn't exist. They are more than happy to have you think that. They failed to know what Tim Osman oh I mean Osama bin Lauden was doing on nine to eleven, and so he calls for ending the FBI, ending the CIA. And again, this is where we are right now. We're in a fourth turning. People are fed up

with their corrupt institutions. Institutions have been around long enough that people know what they are about and are demanding that they be changed. This is the time that we're in, and so we need to understand that we're in that time because they do and they're trying to use it to their advantage. If we understand that it won't be used against us. The history of the FBI lands substantial plausibility to Tucker Carlson's claim that intelligence agencies are in the business of blackmailing

members of Congress. This is another thing that supposedly Tucker has discovered. He doesn't even mention the disaster. Who was the longest serving Speaker of the House of Republicans, I think, for any flavor of politician, simply because he was blackmailable. He was a pedophile wrestling coach, and that's why they picked him to run for Congress, and that's why they picked him to be Speaker

of the House, because they could control him with blackmail. Hoover, during his forty eight year reign at the FBI, of course, was lauded over the decades as a hero, but in reality, he was, in the words of historian Beverly Gage, a one dimensional tyrant, a backroom schemer who strong armed the rest of the country into submission. The most influential federal appointee of the twentieth century until we get to Fauci. They don't say that.

That's what I say. Fauci's like Jager Hoover. He knows how to play these people. He knows how to get what he wants. When Hoover died, his secretary was destroying files for a very long time. It was Truman also, who said, you know, the FBI is trending towards a gestapo, and he says he's got files on everybody, and Nixon said the same thing. You guys blackmailing everybody. It was an open secret to all them, but now you know, Tucker's going to let you in on it.

Unfortunately, many Americans are enthralled at these organizations thanks to relentless propaganda that tells us this American version of the KGB exists for our own good. And I think it is also the fact that we have an inability to imagine this kind

of evil. And I say that all the time. I say it about you know, people like Ted Bundy, and he's able to get away with that because he's such a polite, nice looking young man, very intelligent, clean cut, is a serial color and a rapist and people just can't. That's just so far outside of what normal people think. You know, you

can't meet somebody and think that of them. And so, you know, bad people project the kinds of bad things that they do, you know, the kinds of stuff that Hillary Clinton was accusing people of, and so she's projecting what she does, what her husband does, on to other people. We see that all the time. We, on the other hand, normal people project onto the psychopaths normalcy, right. We want to believe that they're normal. We want to believe that they're like us. They're not at all

like us. That's our big problem. So if you look at the indictment against Congressman Henry Quahlar, this is Conservative Treehouse talking about this. Had several people send this to me. Rather remarkable indictment against Congressman Henry Quailar, Texas Democrat that everyone should read, says Conservative Treehouse. You might remember that he

was openly critical of the Biden border crisis. In the latter half of twenty twenty one, approximately a few weeks after he was openly and strongly criticizing Biden, FBI agents raided his home. At the time of the FBI raid, everyone noted the visible connection between his criticism of Biden and the launch of the DOJ investigation against him. The timing was just too convenient. Last Friday,

an indictment was unsealed. Representative Quailar and his wife were each charged with two counts of conspiracy to commit bribery of a federal official and have a public official act as an agent of a foreign principle, two counts of bribery of a federal official, two counts of conspiracy to commit wirefraud, two counts of violating the ban on public officials acting as agents of a foreign principle, one count

of conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering, and five counts of money laundering. So these are all things that possibly he could have done, all things that would have been ignored had he not opposed Biden publicly. Interestingly, the charges in the activity date back to twenty fourteen. They were willing to let all of this stuff assuming that it happened. Again, these are allegations from the government, but let's just assume for the moment that this stuff really happened.

If it did happen, they were fine to let it set there for a decade, and it only became a point of investigation after he criticized Biden. That's when he got indicted. Quilar and his wife are a case studying how the average federal politician gets wealthy from selling through office. All the DC politicians participate in this type of influence selling. I agree with that, except now

here's the thing that I disagree strongly with and served a Treehouse. One of the primary reasons the intelligence community was so fast to join in an effort to eliminate the threat of Trump was specifically due to his life of corrupt activity. Seriously, are you serious? This is the delusional you're talk about Trump delusion syndrome. They actually that's what I call it. Trump derangement is what the left has. Trump delusion is what the right has at or else they just

want to suck up to him for audience. Look, you know, Trump is in the same boat as Kuhlar. They are not innocent, I don't think and but yes they are being prosecuted politically. That's the thing to take away from it. You know, when you look at Donald Trump. Yes, Biden came after Trump because he's his political opponent. It is a game of thrones. Yes, Biden came after Henry Quahlar because he opposed Biden. That doesn't mean that Henry Quahlar is innocent, and it doesn't mean that Trump

is innocent. It just means that they focus on them because it's a game of thrones. And yet people can't see that. Conservative treehouse can't see that. It's absolutely amazing to me, absolutely amazing. Well, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, one of the things the Marxist mobs of protesters are doing, they have defaced a World War One monument in New York City.

You know. The elderly granddaughter of the guy who sculpted it, just absolutely incredulous at their ignorance about all of this. She said, it's unbelievable. She said, what a time we are living in. She is seventy six. She said this when she learned the graffiti and the anti Israel stickers were plastered on late late grandfather carl il Alava's historic World War One tribute to

American Hebrew heroes. She said, they're idiots. She said. It's really ironic too, because these guys, these American boys who gave their lives and blood, were fighting for people's freedom. She said, And here you have these hooligans who just don't understand history, and probably they don't just understand what they're doing either. Well, I think they understand history, but I also I don't want to integrate the good intentions of people who thought they were doing

good. But the people who fought in World War One were deceived. They were deceived by Woodrow Wilson and many others. It's not to say that what they did was not heroic in terms of once they got thrown into that, whether it was by being drafted or deception, they acted honorably. But you know, it was the war itself was and that's but I got to say that these these this defacement and graffiti, that it's not coming from that place.

It's not coming from Woodrow Wilson was a lying scumbag who killed unbelievable numbers of people. I mean, it really is heartbreaking when you look at so many of the people there was. A composer's name is George Butterworth or Butterfield, I can't remember which it is. But he wrote a very very very popular classical piece that's part of the repertoire most orchestras and they team it up usually with ralph On Williams piece and the Banks of Green Willow. And he

didn't have much that he got done. It's one of the few works that he got finished because he was shipped off to World War One and he died needlessly there, needlessly, Travis says, these people who hate Americans used, who hate these people hate who Americans used to be the fact that the people that honorable and self sacrificing existed is itself a condemnation of their debase and deracinated

existence. I couldn't say it better myself. That's exactly right. Yeah, they hate honor, they hate people who saw that they had a duty to do. I believe it was misguided, but I think they acted honorably, she said. I'm very sad. I think my grandfather would feel the same way. I think he'd be saddened that people can be so misguided, so destructive of things that are not about them and not about their political beliefs. And I think that also applies to wars, wars like World War One.

It was so incredibly destructive, so misguided, something that was not about America, something that was not about American political beliefs. But that's not too Again, I'm not denigrating what these people did. He wouldn't be enraged, he was too kind of a man. But he would be very, very sad, she said. I think it probably feels sorry for these people who did it, these youthful idiots of the Marxist revolution again. They're doing this not

because they hate war. They're not doing this because they want peace. They're doing this because they hate America. They hate our society, They hate people who have duty and responsibility and stand up for society. They hate the builders because they can't do anything except destroy. It was a large bronze statue featured

seven soldiers, including one holding a collapsed conrad a comrade. It was placed near the park's entrance and the armory for the seventh Regiment, whose infantry helped to break Germany's Hindenburg Line of defense at the conclusion of World War One. That was the nineteen twenty seven plaque that was there. So perhaps he's this vandalizing mob can't read either, They don't know what it's about, but they

hate everything that is American. One American hater burned a US flag at his base, while some protesters climbed on top of the statue's soldiers and draped Palestinian flags of them. And they did the same thing to a statue of Civil War General William to comes to Sherman nearby. Well, now that I could support if you really understand Sherman's This guy was literally insane said, Ulysses Grant, and he was very as always say, he was unhinged and he was

looking for revenge. Alan Dershwitz, meanwhile, is holding daily press conferences about how to punish anybody who criticizes Israel. There is absolutely nothing that Alan Dershwitz won't do. You harm a Jew, or you offend a Jew, we sue. That's what he said yesterday. Now he's saying any university that divests from Israel should have its federal funding terminated. Let's hold that thought for a

moment before we get into that aspect of it. Why is a university that has enough money that it can invest it, Why does it need to have federal funds if it's got some huge hulking trust fund that it's looking to put all of that money into. Why do taxpayers have to fund these universities. I'm I think that all universities, regardless of what their position is on Israel,

ought to be defunded. And I want all foreign aid defunded, including to Israel, All federal aid defunded to foreign governments, all federal aid to these foreign institutions that we call universities defunded as well, and not just because I disagree with them, but because there's no authority in the Constitution for universities to be given money. But that's why it exists. And the fact that they give them money, and the fact that he wants the money removed,

shows that we all understand. The way the federal government operates outside of the rule of law is by bribery and by blackmail, using Fiat cash from the Federal Reserve. That is their superpower. And so this is money for mandates. The thing is Dershwitz never had a problem when they were using it to push Marxism. He never had a problem when they were using it to push

racism against white people. He never had a problem with any of that, And neither do any of the Republicans in Congress have a problem with any of that. They only have a problem with the anti Semitism. And that's the double standard that is just amazing to me. So, yes, absolutely take

away their money. But he wants to take away their money now, not even because of hate speech or I should say speech that he hates any criticism of a foreign government that owns our government should have their money taken away. That's what Mike Johnson said. But he goes a step further. If you don't invest your excess stash of cash that you've got, if you don't invest that in Israel, then and you remove it from Israel, then you want

to have your federal funding cut down. So we pay taxes so that the federal government can give the money to these universities. They've got so much money that they invest it in all these different types of things, including Israel, and then if they pull any of that out of Israel, oh, under those circumstances, they will stop giving them our money. And it is our money, even though it's being created out of thin air by the Federal Reserve,

because we have to pay it back with interest. This is the same guy who was saying during the lockdowns, Yeah, what we're talking about here, we're talking about people into taking vaccines, But I'm talking about forcing people. I'm talking about sending Dershowitz wanted the police to come to your door and drag you out of your house. That's his words, drag you out of your house and put a needle in your arm. And he said, and I'll defend that before the Supreme Court and I'll win. Well, it doesn't

mean that it's right. If he wins, doesn't mean that it's ethical, moral, or legal, or constitutional, doesn't mean that it's any of that stuff. It just says, well, this corrupt political institution of nine political appointees is tatalitarian and supports that kind of dictatorial government. And we already know that, and he knows it as well. That's why he's confident that he could win arguing a literal mandate. We're going to drag you out of your

house and put this needle in your arm by force. This is the kind of person. Alan Dershowitz, big fan of Donald Trump. That's the kind of person he is. That's the kind of person Trump is. Two folks, don't tell me he wouldn't mandate this stuff. You'll find out if he becomes president of the second time what he's capable of doing. Fully, if you didn't understand what he's capable of doing in twenty twenty, So, yeah, speak no evil, Do not divest from Israel. You must invest in

them or Alan Dershwitz is going to come for you. Just amazing, just amazing. And he's one of these at Harvard, you know, teaches law at Harvard. He's one of the biggest problems out there of these corrupted institutions. And yet this is all he's going to talk about. A third of Stanford students are okay with violence to shut down speech, says a report. Well, if he was their law professor, you probably have a higher percentage

of people because the government is force. Dershowitz, just with just as with a vaccine, in many ways, has supported the violence and the terrorism of government. And that's what we're talking about with these mandates, with these with the censorship and all the rest of it. And he supports that, absolutely does support that. We'll be right back making sense common again. You're listening to the David Night Show. All right, welcome back. Let's talk a

little bit about the Biden administration and some of their social engineering. It extends outside of the schools. What is happening there. The Biden administration has just decided that you cannot be involved in foster care unless you want to foster the LGBT agenda, specifically the transgendering of kids. And if you don't support that, he is demanding that you should not be part of the foster care system.

Well, how can he do that because foster care is run by at the state level, isn't it. He does it with the money, always, always that type of thing, and of course we knew that was where he was coming from, you know, believing that Christian parents are unfit. We just had a family just a few months ago. Unfortunately, the publicity caused the by the administration back off, which had a German homeschooling family had

fled Germany gotten political asylum here a decade ago. They've been supporting themselves. They're not living off of the government, and they're educating their own kids because their kids would have been taken away from them if they homeschool them in Germany, and so Biden wants to send them back. Fortunately the publicity caused his organization to back off, But now he wants to take children away from parents.

You know, Germans will take them away if you homeschool them. He wants to take them away if you don't misgender them and you don't play that game, or if you push back against what the government is doing in terms of gaslighting and grooming miners. Miners folks, the state has begun to supplant parental guidance more critically divine authority, even with his own secular doctrine, but it's parntal rights always at the center of this because they want to destroy the

family. And the key thing about this was that this is an agenda that's been around for a very long time, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Every other country has signed it except for the United States. And yet you have politicians and courts especially will enact certain parts of this UN agenda. The whole idea of the rights of a child, this is all tied together with what Hillary Clinton was pushing. Takes a village to raise a

child. In other words, she says, the government should raise your children. We don't want a family right. Families are bad. Villages are good because I'm in charge of the village. So this whole idea of children's rights is there to supplant parental rights. But children don't have rights. We've never let them drink alcohol, smoke tobacco, have a gun, drive a car. You can't get a tattoo in most states unless you are eighteen years old, so one or two of them have it, like at sixteen or something.

But we understand that you don't do certain things like that. And yet they have swept all that stuff away, demand that kids get something that is far more permanent than a tattoo. You know, you can undo a tattoo to some degree, I guess, but you're not going to undo this gender mutilation or sterilization. Under these new regulations, any child who professes an LGBT identity can demand placement in a home that affirms this identity, effectively excluding Christian

foster homes. The state, rather than God, rather than the child's own parents, becomes the ultimate authority on morality and identity. And right now they're doing it with foster kids. But it's not going to stop there. It's already happening with families in Canada. This is a violation of our rights, is a violation of religious liberty. It is an aspiration of the United Nations.

See they in order to have a global world government where everybody is enslaved, you've got to get rid of families and parents, and you do that by getting rid of parental rights. Why should this concern us? First, it underminds the natural and biblical role of the family. Scripture teaches us children are heritage from the Lord, entrusted to parents who are tasked with their upbringing.

According to godly principles, and folks, if you don't believe that, believe Richard Dawkins, who regrets that we've lost the Christian foundations of our society. You take away God and watch what is happening to our society. That's where we are right now. By sidelining Christian homes that do not subscribe to the affirming agenda, the state disrupts this divine mandate, replacing it with humanism, with transhumanism essentially, because that's what transgender is moving the Overton window too.

The whole transgender thing with kids is moving this to pedophilia, you know, again talking about our friend Alan Dershwitz, you know, he thinks that the age of consent should be lowered to satisfy his preferences, should we call it. He's got his sexual preferences as well. He wants it to kids thirteen or something like that. I forget exact age that he was talking about, but he wants it to very young teens. And so that's one of

the Overton windows that are being moved. They're opening that Overton window, you want to talk about it being open. And then, of course the other part of this is the transgender stuff, I mean the transhuman stuff, all this stuff about furries. And we were just talking about this the other day.

You know, when we were in school, if you tried to even do anything that was a tiny fraction of that kind of disruption, having people wearing, you know, furry costumes, just even if they it wasn't the kind of behavior that they're exhibiting, you know, making animal noises and crawling around on all fours. Even if they just came in wearing a animal costume, that would not be allowed. I'm sorry, that's against the dress code that sent you down the Dana boys or girls and you'd got a spanking with

a paddle. But let alone to have them have these paws that have claws on them that they can attack other students with. It's just amazing that they allow that to happen. Why do they allow that to happen. Well, because they're pushing the virtual reality as well, transhumanism and virtual reality. That's the other part of it, besides pedophilia that they're talking about. And so when we look at this, it's important to remember and we'll get we're going

to get into the politics here. In a moment. RFK Junior was asked about this child mutilation. Here's what he had to say. What will you do as a president to get this nonsense out to prevent kids under the age of eighteen with or without the consent of the father to transition. You may even say that is an okay policy, you're a part of that. Many families disagree with one. What's your position on this and what will you do as a president? I mean, my position is that people should not be

able to have access to those procedures that minors shouldn't without parental permission. And you know, I don't know enough about it patrick to say that it should be completely illegal under eighteen No, no, yeah, I just don't know off what what I'm going to tell you because I don't know for Robert, I mean, you're I don't you know what. I don't know enough for me. I know nothing cases save somebody's life. I don't know that, and I'm not going to tell you that I have an answer to a question.

May tell you this. I just want to say that there's a big difference between those two things. One saving somebody's life to transition and cut the dangling off. How are you saving that person's life? Some of these things. Logically they make no sense to parents, both parents on both sides. There is conflicting values, and one of the values is freedom to do what you want with your own body and have the government tell you you can or

you can't do that. Who is protecting kids under the age of eighteen? Though? That's the other right, And that's why I say nobody can do without their parents' permission. That's solid. And then I have to look at the drugs, the safety of the drugs, whether there's permanent damage from them. I just don't know. You're rolling your eyes like I shouldn't have this an obvious question. It is an obvious question. You're driving a car, Well, well do you. I don't think anybody should have cards. I'm

agreeing and consents for the thirteen year old to vote. Should we be okay with that because the parents said it's okay. Should we trust thirteen year old? I get that? But why should it be legal for somebody at thirteen with parents consent to transition? Yeah? We could take other examples. We could say, well, you know, uh, the age of consent to sex, it's going to be eighteen or twenty one or whatever it is. Uh, but you know, if the parents feel otherwise, the parents can

sexually molest their kids at any point time. Do you support that? RFK Junior. Well, I really don't know. Who am I to say about any of this stuff. I mean, you know, come on, give me a break. We've seen this kind of vacillating, spineless approach to abortion for the loan. Who am I to say that that's a child? Yeah? Well, just take a look at the pictures. Take a look at the pictures, and you'll know he's also in the past been pushing this kind

of stuff. I played this for yesterday. Red state people are more likely to murder you, to impregnate your teenage daughter, to commit a violent crime against you, to commit a non violent crime against you, to watch Desperate Housewives on TV, to buy pornography, to buy you know, degenerate video games like Grand Theft Alato. Yeah. Yeah, be very afraid of those Red state parents. Right. We got trouble right there, got trouble in

those Red states. Wow, But you know, I don't know, maybe parents who would transition their kids, maybe they can impregnate their kids if they want to under his regime. Here, Well, who am I to say, parents ought to be able to do anything that He supports parents ripping their kids to pieces while they're alive. It's called abortion by planned parenthood. But he supports the live vivisection of babies. So why wouldn't he support child mutilation

by the parents? Of course, okay, because that's what it means to be a parent, isn't it. So today the focus may be on foster care, but how long until the same principles are applied more broadly questioning the fitness of parents based on their adherents to Biblical teaching. And this is already happening in Canada. This is not an extrapolation. This is not saying,

you know, we're on a slippery so we know where this is. Trudeau is a little bit ahead of Biden on this because Biden's got to go slow. It's an election year. You watch what happens after the election, and I think it'll happen with either Biden or Trump. Because Trump was pushing this trans gender stuff and the men and beauty contests and all the rest of the stuff over a decade ago. They're pushing it with fundraisers at mar Lago.

He is just undercover and Biden is slow walking this to some degree over where he's going to go until after the election and when Trump gets reelected, same type of thing. You don't have to worry about what you're going to do the next one. If a state can dictate that a child in foster care must be placed in an affirming home, what stops it from declaring that any child expressing confusion over identity must be removed from non affirming biological parents, as

is happening now in Trudeau's Canada. You see. And so even Reason says, don't co parent with Congress, and by this what they're doing, they're pushing back against this idea that we're going to lock up the Internet using ID

because we've got to have age verification stuff everywhere. The people who are calling for age verification, in many cases it's mostly the Republicans who are calling for that, but as some Democrats who are doing that as well, and they're calling for the ban of TikTok for the same reasons, and they want to use that as a way to usher in IDs to use the Internet. And that's why Reason is talking about this, says you don't need to co parent

with Congress. You don't need to co parent with your school board or the school. Keep your kids out, don't co parent with anybody when you drop them off at the school. Their idea is that you have surrendered your children to the state. They've said that in court decisions and that the state will act in loco parentis in place of the parents. This writer at Reason, who is coming at this from a purely secular standpoint, says, I'm the

parent of a teenage daughter who does not have any social media accounts. She has lived her life unplugged. I remember very clearly when I decided to institute this policy. When she was about four years old. We were sitting together in the waiting room at the pediatrician's office, and as usual, I was on my phone sending emails. She wanted to play with my device, and I declined by saying, when you've learned to be comfortable alone with your thoughts,

you can play with my phone. Now. That would not be the basis on which I would make that decision, but that's whatever the reason is. She made that decision, and she was able to stick to it, even though she's got her child in a government school. She said, at age ten, we added a landline for the house, and we bought a laptop for her schoolwork. Strangely, landline phones are making a comeback with Generation Z thanks to the same two thousands nostalgia keeping the Scream movie franchise alive.

Is that right? Is this our Landlines like the new Vinyl records or something. I've had Vinyl records. I've had Landlines. They're not all that great, folks. I mean, the album covers are great. It's nice to have, but you can get a big album cover and still have a nice CD. I certainly to appreciate CDs I've had that reminds me I've had and I've been meaning to mention this. I had a listener who sent me a CD and I got that separated two times as this happened, and Karen just

brought up the other one said, this is even older. I've had two times that listeners have sent me CDs that they've done in music, and I really wanted to listen to it and to talk to people about it, but I lost the paper got separated from the paperwork that got separated from I don't know who they are, so I want to talk about that. But you know the other thing about it is that even though I really do prefer CDs and I've got a big library of and of LPs, I have not set

that stuff up since we moved two years. I don't have any way to listen to this stuff now, so you know, taking the drives out of the computers and things like that. So it's something I've got the hardware, I just haven't had the time to hook it up. But anyway, getting back to the nostalgia thing of landlines, maybe we could get a rotary dial

too. That'd be ultra coolou, wasn't it. Younger generations are even beginning to self regulate their screen time by switching to dumb phones and old school flip phones. Well that's a very healthy thing to do if you don't want to be tracked. But she says, there's market solutions for all this stuff, and this is one of the reasons why I wanted to mention it. She said, our family purchased the Bark phone that's b a r K, like

a tree bark, the Bark phone for our tan. Bark is one of many cellular devices with parental controls and permissions already built into the operating system, and so she said, kids who have it get to enjoy the social boost of having what looks like an Android or an iPhone. See that's what I'm saying this. This parent is concerned about the kid's social boosts. They need to learn that lesson too. You don't want social boost you don't want to

be a part of that group. Think and you know if you're depending on peer pressure for approval and things like that. That's one lesson they could learn. But she's saying, Oh, they got a phone and so they don't look like they're an outcast or something. Let them be an outcast anyway, she said. However, all app downloads can be set to require parental approval. There are also adjustable monitoring features powered by AI to flag content and conversations

that parents might want to know about. It's got a lot of competitors, including gab that's with two B's, gab Phones, True Me, Troo m I, and Pinwheel I Wonder that's put out by Todd Friel. He says, if the government tells you gotta wear pit and wheels on your head, you wear pin wheels on your head anyway. Consumer er have a remarkable number of options that contradict the notion that parents are powerless or lack tools to guide

their children online and thus require some government help. And that's the key, that's the key. But I wanted to mention those tools as well as the fact that government help and raising your kids, government help, and educating your kids, government help, and providing sports for your kids, all those things,

Folks are traps. They're deadly traps. Avoid them. And so in Austin there is a fight between a local jurisdiction, and I think this is again we talk about this a lot, the importance of local government, how local government can make things better or worse than state or especially federal government. We talk about nullification, non commandeering, all the rest of this stuff. So you have a situation now where Texas, as a state law, has

said that there's not going to be any mutilation of miners. They call it gender affirming care, and so that has been prohibited by the state. But the Austin City Council voted last Thursday to ignore a state law which prohibits gender mutilation and procedures under the age of eighteen, treating it essentially like tattoos.

On May the second, the Austin City Council then passed a resolution that purportedly directs the city manager and city employees not to comply with Texas's prohibition of puberty blockers. See this is something regardless where you stand on this issue, it brings up important issues of nullification and non commandeering. Riddled with problems. The resolution starts with the falsehood that such prohibited treatments have quote proven to be evidence

based, medically necessary in life saving, none of which is true. And it is the policy of the city that knows city personnel fund, personnel funds or resources shall be used to investigate, to criminally prosecute, or to impose administrative penalties for this minor mutilation. It's actually major mutilation, but it's mutilation

of major mutilation of minors. So this is something that it does really bring up issues because how does the state force them to enforce the state laws, regardless of what the state laws are, regardless of what you think about these things, how does that actually happen. This is why I say all politics is local, and I say, if you're listing in Austin, get out

of there before God calls in a strike. But all politics is local, and so you cannot really effectively force these people to enforce the law that they don't agree with. And this is why I say what I do about the federal you know, making it a federal law as to when abortion can take place. If you do that, if you restrict it, you will never

get the Blue States to save babies' lives. They won't say, well, you know, I think the women ought to be able to kill babies up to birth and beyond, but the law says that we can't do that, so I'll obey the law. They're not going to obey the law. Don't be naive about this stuff. And the people are pushing this on you. The Republican politicians and even some quote unquote pro life organizations that are pushing this are doing this because they want this to be a reason for you to give

them money and support. That's why they're doing it. But what will happen is when they restrict it and say I'm sorry when they allow abortion the Red States or if you will, I hate to use that term, but the Republicans pro life states will say, Okay, well, there's nothing I can do about it's a federal law. It is going to be asymmetric in that regard. That's why I do not support those types of efforts. But again, the most important thing that you can do is is at the local level.

It's more important than the state, and it's way more important than federal because they can make things much better or much worse than the federal or state laws. So that's the fight that's going on there in Austin. And then the Education Secretary, Miguel Cardona, has had another interesting back and forth before Congress. And this tells us something not only about his moral hypocrisy, his arrogance, but also tells us a great deal about the relationship between Congress and

the bureaucracy. So call it the deep state, how out of control they are and how afraid of them Congress is. So he was asked whether or not he would let boys fight his daughter in sports or undress in front of her in a bathroom at a hearing yesterday. Biden's administration released a finalized rule in April that extends Title nine protection to encompass sexual orientation and gender identity. It does not address by name transgender athletes, but it talks about gender identity.

And so you had a Republican representative from Utah, Burgess Owens former football player says to this Department of Education head Cardona, would you force your daughter to undress in the bathroom with boys who are also undressing? He said. Cardona said, I'm not going to be commenting on athletic rules that we haven't yet proposed. Oh wow, Okay. See this is an elected member of Congress. He's not only going to not answer him, but he also doesn't

care what this guy thinks because they're the ones writing the rules. Congress does nothing, folks. They hold these types of show hearings to which you have stonewalling from these bureaucrats who are the real rulers. They write the rules, they are the rulers. The real rulers in Washington are these permanently entrenched bureaucrats. And it doesn't matter who the president is, it doesn't matter who the Congress is, because they're not going to do anything about it except hold hearings

every day. I pull this stuff up, Jim Jordan, I'm going to hold a hearing on that again too, And it's like, get do something, do something useful again. Your power is not in holding hearings. Your power is not even an impeachment. Your power is in cutting off the money. And we see this all about constantly stressed how important the money is.

That's how they rule, that's how the bureaucracy and the executive branch rules is with money, and they're allowed to have unlimited amounts of money from Congress. Congress never restricts it. As Scalia told the group of Republican congressmen with Thomas Massey that I talked about yesterday, said that's your power. You're the most

powerful organization because you can cut off the money. Well, if they don't cut off the money, then the most powerful organization becomes the bureaucracy, and the president over the bureaucracy because they can bribe people to do or blackmail people to do anything they want. So then he says, well, if your daughter was reported that she felt uncomfortable on boys presence in a bathroom or locker room, would that be considered by your administration to be discrimination or bigotry?

Owen's said again he declined to provide a yes or no answer. I'm not going to comment on that. I don't have to answer to you, right, same type of if we saw from the head of the CIA, which was who was also the Secretary of Defense Panetta, Leon Panetta, I called him Lion Panetta. When he was asked by Jeff Sessions before Sessions was the Attorney journal, he said, you're going to talk to us before you declare

war, before you put troops into Syria, aren't you? Well, Senator, we will consult with our allies and NATO and the UN and we'll let you know what we decided. What you used to be a congressman. You got to do the constitution. You got to tell us we've got to vote on this. Well, Congressman or Senator, I will. We'll confer with our allies at NATO, will let you know what we decide. That type

of thing. This is what these other bureaucrats are saying to Owens. Are you gonna you would you be comfortable even if your own child was in the situation. Well, I'm not going to give you any answer. I'm going to write the rules, and then i'll talk about the rules after I've written them. That kind of arrogance. Girls have now into contact sports of boxing and wrestling. Would you allow your daughter to physically fight and get beat up by a boy who called himself a girl? Owen's ass, Yes or no?

Well, I'll be happy to once we finalize our regulations. You're just a congressman. You don't do anything. We have regulation without representation. That's essentially what he's saying. First Party said, once we finalize our regulations, I'll let you know what we decide, just like putting us in a war, they'll let us know what they decide. And the people in Congress, whether it's the Senate or whether it's the House, they're not going to do

anything to stop any of this. These people just shut them down. So we're going to take a quick break before we do on Rock Finn, Father Coughlan, thank you for the tip. The deep state has a history of abusing World War One vets. Remember Hooverville. Yeah, that's right, nineteen thirty two. That's right. They were asking for they were asking for the

benefits they were owed, and they weren't getting them. Attack dogs MacArthur and his lackey Eisenhower ordered and beat and burned and killed vets and their kids camped the footsteps of and camped on the footsteps of the Capitol. Only Smedley Butler objected and supported these vets stripped of their benefits. Disgusting statues versus flesh. I'll take the living people. That's right. They do that, and then they erect statues. You know, we honor these people that we have set

out to die. I always want over think about that. I always think about the Pirates of Penzance. It's a great they have the policemen, they come in and they they did some satire or the police in that, and then the pirates are there, and so they the major General is sending the police out to go engage the pirates. And the song that they have these women say, go, ye, heroes, go and die. It's like and when you do, we'll weep for you at your grave and all the

rest of the stuff. But you, heroes, go and die. H And the as she such to say that, the policemen start to get second thoughts about this, because you should have some second thoughts about that. Make sure that you're fighting an adjust cause and adjust war will be right back analyzing

the globalist's next move. And now the deepd nutshell. Well, we have a woman who connected with a lot of people, went viral millions of people. She reacted with disbelief what JP Morgan's CEO said about the quality of the average Americans life financially speaking, and of course Jamie Demon or Diamond depending on your perspective, blasted as being out of touch. He has a net worth of about two billion dollars according to Forbes. He said consumers still have excess

money from COVID. Well, that pandemic was a great thing. It gave us. We made out like bandits, didn't we? Well, no people like him did. The consumer is in pretty good shape right now, he said to an interviewer. And this person who responded this said, my jaw dropped at the garbage he was saying. He was so out of touch. This is the largest bank in America, st a person on TikTok, Well, the question is is and I guess this article from zero Hedge from qdr's

Fringe Finance really is a rhetorical question. Is the economic system being destroyed on purpose? Hans? Are we the bad guys? What's this skull on our cap here? I think that is just a rhetorical question. I think we can see that that is exactly what is happening. They talk a little bit about the Cloward and pivot stuff, so I'm not going to go over that. But again we know that is exactly what is happening. And so what do you do in a situation like this? Will you prepare? You store

up things. And one of the things that you can prepare, especially when they're trying to collapse the economic system, make sure that you've got something that is outside of the economic system that they're trying to collapse. And the thing that is most outside of the economic system that they're trying to collapse is gold. You can physically hold that. Once you get it, what happens to it at that point they have no idea. You can have complete financial transactional

privacy. And so if you want to start preparing for that, a great way to do that is at Wisewolf Gold. That's Tony Ardaban. He's set up David Night Gold that'll take you there. You can get gold or silver, small or large transactions, and of course he also has a buying group wolf Pack, that allow you to buy on a regular basis. You can decide how much you want to budget each month to start getting out of this

financial system as a hedge. Essentially, you know that's the zero Hedge talks about that, and you know that's where their title for their organization comes from a hedge to get out of this type of situation. So I was saying earlier in the show, you know, I keep seeing this type of thing, especially WorldNet Daily. They put up Wayne Allen Rude and stuff, and this idea that in six months we'll know if we even have a country. This is by Joseph Farah. It was still the editor there, and I

absolutely totally disagree with that. Just as I was talking about what's going on in Austin. Everything does not depend on this next presidential election. All of the existential things. Oh, we got to get Trump in because the border is a mess. Did he fix it? No? And he did a couple of very minor things that were not to fix You had caravans coming in for the first time. He didn't do anything to end DACA or the Dreamer

program, did nothing about any of that stuff. And then it, you know, picks right back up in his administration and then accelerated him more with Biden coming back. In every one of these elections I've seen, the game is to say that this election is the most important thing, you know, the most important election of your life, and it is really important. And if we really believe that that is the path the civil war, because you're going to say, well, in six months, we know if we still

have a country or if we're going to be in a civil war. And that's the danger of all this stuff that is happening with Trump. You know, we look at the trial and everybody wants to talk about I'm not going to talk about you know what Stormy Daniel's to say. I didn't even want to read it, you know. And it's a bunch of salacious, disgusting stuff, just as you would expect from both of them, both from her

and from him. And the reason that's being done is because the Republican people are locked in behind Trump and the Democrats are locked in against him, and so what they're trying to do they're fighting over the Independence and the purpose of this trial is to show his character to the Independence and get them to be completely revolted by it. And I don't know if that's going to work or

not. His purpose in trolling the drudge and acting like a toddler in court and an outside of it with his you know, he keeps getting these contempt orders and fines against him. He likes that, and he is goating this judge to try to get him to throw him in jail. That's his best hope, quite frankly, going to jail. That would give him the upper hand, as all of this stuff has. This is why there was no

primary this time. All these people say, you know, if I think this may be the last election that we have, folks, is not an election. There's no debates, there's no primaries for either one of these candidates. There was no competition, there was no election. The election rigging starts with who you have to choose from right? And how did they rig it? Well, they rigged it with these trials and everything. Biden is rigging it in his perspective to try to demonize Trump. Trump is playing the victim

card. And once he starts playing that, nobody's talking about any policy. He doesn't have to debate anything with DeSantis or anybody else. It's all about that. And so the thing he would like to have the most is to be thrown into jail, because then everybody would be talking about how over the top that is, and it would be over the top, you know, get him, he can play the victim card and they don't have to talk about any policies or anything, and they don't have to talk about what he

did with Stormy Daniels. This is the game they're playing, and I'm disgusted with all this, and I'm disgusted with the people who put this stuff out like this. This is what Josephair went on to say. Democrats have been engineering this coup. They rigged the institutions to cover their tracks, from the media, the law schools, Hollywood, public education, and so forth. And exactly, Joseph, what has the Republican Party done about any of this

stuff over your lifetime or mine? Nothing? Have they done anything about this? Absolutely nothing. The GOP in Washington has done nothing about all of these things. This has been all going on for decades now. We've been captured by the deep state and we only have one shot left. And his name is Donald Trump. This is disgusting fanboy delusion. Only he has the courage, experience, and fortitude to do this. I'll pause here so you can

vomit. Isn't that disgusting? And think back to Reagan? Think back to Reagan? And then he's got some quotes from Ronald Ringgan. Why don't you think back to Trump? He's been president, didn't he say anything notable? Well, as a matter of fact, he didn't. He's just throwing insults at other people. He has nothing to say about philosophy, principles, policy, nothing, He's just throwing insults other people. But he quotes Reagan who

says his government expands liberty contracts. Well, that's right, But you know, Reagan didn't do anything about the expansion of government and to the Department of Education, which happened during an election year. He said he was going to get rid of it. Instead he grew it for the next eight years.

So government expanded and liberty contracted. In education. It's the Department of Educations bribing everybody too, and blackmailing everybody to do what they wanted to put these boys in the girl rolls, bathrooms and all the rest of this stuff. Reagan told us, Republicans believe every day is the fourth of July, but the Democrats believe every day is April of fifteenth. Oh yeah, Republicans are going to cut our taxes a little bit. The Republicans are going to get

rid of the irs. Well, the Republicans stop the irs from growing seven times as becoming seven times bigger with this latest thing. Well, you know, Kevin McCarthy was there. He's going to just you know, Biden wanted to grow it by factor of seven. McCarthy said, let's only grow up by factor of five. Now you've got a trader Machiavelli and Mike there, and Johnson wants to grow it back to seven. He's back to growing it, making it. We're going to jump it to seven times the size it

is. They're not going to restrict the taxes. They're going to increase the tyranny of the irs. That's even worse than raising taxes because the purpose of this and arming them with artificial and intelligence is to take everything from everybody. Just accuse people of stuff, just like the toll roads in Texas accused us of using the toll roy. They accused people of anything they want. And then he says the nation that cannot control its borders is not a nation.

Reagan said that. Do you remember that Reagan gave amnesty to the illegal aliens? Folks, this is a charade. Whether you're talking about Reagan, where you're talking about Trump, they don't share your concerns. The local level is where you have to go. But he finishes with this. Reagan's gone. But thankfully Trump lives on Wow Wow. Well, you know he was given the day off to go to his son's graduation by this judge, but he's

going to be heading a Republican fundraiser. And again he played the victim card, which is, you know what he does with all this stuff? Oh, I can't even go to my son's graduation. As I said at the time, did your child miss their graduation in twenty twenty because Trump locked down the schools and the graduations. Did that happen to you in twenty twenty? Even worse, did your child die and not graduate because of the Trump shots

and the Trump juice? You know, talk to me about going to your son's graduation at this elitist school, and you're going to spend the bulk of the day raising money at a fundraiser in Minnesota while your son's graduating in Florida. Yeah, he can make the flight on his private jet three hours and forty five minute flight from West Palm Beach to where he's going to be raising

money in Minnesota. But he's been playing the victim card. Who will explain for me to my wonderful son, Baron, who is a great student at a fantastic school that his dad will likely not be allowed to attend his graduation ceremony, something we've been talking about for years because they seriously conflicted and corrupt New York State judge wants me a criminal court on a bogus Biden case, which, according to all virtually all legal scholars and pundits, has no merit

and should never have been brought. Well, again, maybe you could use this graduation as an opportunity to talk to your son about morality. You think of that? Yeah, well, son, you know this is what happens to Army Daniels, and this is why I was cheating on your mom. But don't you do that? Okay, you want to do a Mia Kalpa about that Trump. You want to have a heart to heart talk with Baron about what you have done. Oh, that's right, you didn't do anything

wrong. That's right, anything, any of your sins don't count because you're a billionaire. You're just like Michael Blomberg, going to buy your way into heaven. Bloomberg's going to buy his way in with his gun control stuff, and you're going to buy your way in by pointing out to God, how many MAGA people just love you. And you know some of them go to

church too. Yeah, how about that, Jack? The Soviet call the judge's decision not to let Trump go to his son's graduation, which now he's going to be allowed to do. But before he called it pure evil. Eric Trump called it heartless. Carrie Lake called it both heartless and cruel, and Mike Lee said it was deliberately cruel, except that Trump paid bureaucrats to keep your kids from being able to go to college graduation. He paid pharmaceutical

companies tens of billions of dollars and delivered the poisonous kool aid. You know. Alex Jones says, it's just sugar water. Come and you can take that for Trump. You can do it, do it for Trump, and yeah, drink Jonestown called he paid. Trump paid two hundred and fifty million dollars to the Ad Council, the biggest ad campaign they've ever had to convince people to inject the kool aid, the sugar water, the poison. And

you got now a common thing. As I just mentioned yesterday, somebody that Karen's brother knows his son, a young teenage son athletes, got myocarditis and they're still lying about it. They're still saying it's no problem. Somen can do whatever he wants. It's treatable. Everybody's got it now totally. Is that evil? Is that pure? Evil? Is that heartless? Is that cruel? Are those things heartless and evil and cruel? I think they are.

There's absolutely no way I would ever support Donald Trump for dog catcher. I want him for jail, twenty to twenty four years in jail. As the bumper sticker says, well, RFK Junior has been invited to the Libertarian Convention to speak as well. He's accepted as well. I guess I'm sure they invited Biden, but Biden doesn't know how to speak, so he won't

be there. They're both going to be addressing the Libertarian Convention that's going to be in Washington, d C. And so RFK Jor would like to debate Trump on this. He said, uh, He said, you really should have a debate. He said, people are upset that you blew up the deficit, that you shut down their businesses during COVID, that you filled your administration with swamp creatures. So I'd like to make you an offer. It is perfectly neutral. Territory the LP convention for you and me to have a

debate where you can defend your record for your wavering supporters. Well, he's absolutely right about that, but of course we also know where RFK Junior is coming from. He really besides his moral pedifogging about child mutilation, he also said this about the Green New Deal. He loves a Green New Deal.

You know that all of the modeling for climate change indicates that we're going to defacing superstorm storms on the steroids, droughts, you know, and the disappearance of the ice caps, disappearance suers on every gun, and that it's going to be you know, there's going to be major disruptions not just to humanity but ultimately to civilization. And this is part of the cost that we're paying for our long time deadly addiction to coal and oil endorsm what about AOC's new

Green Deal. What do you think about that? I, you know, I Green New Deal. I think the Green New Deal is all of that stuff is important, is good. We ought to be pursuing it. Yeah, well, there you go, because if we don't, the world's going to end. That's where he's coming from. Yeah, let's have a debate on that. Let's get somebody who actually knows what they're talking about instead of Trump. I'd hate to see Trump try to debate him on the Green New

Deal. He's yeah, yeah, all against this CO two stuff. As a matter of fact, we all want to start breathing. We're going to take a quick break and we come back. We're going to talk to Christopher Willis. He is with an organization called Latitude, and we're going to talk about relocating from one country to another. I think it'll be an interesting conversation. We can talk about the why, the where, the what is it?

How do you do it? Things like that because a lot of people, as you see this frequently in the media, a lot of people are looking at this stuff and we always have this issue, don't we do I of a fight or flight? Do I get out of here? Am I going to be a pilgrim? Or am I going to be a puritan and stick around? And so we'll talk a little bit about what they do and how this is all set up. We'll talk with Chris Willis right after this break. We will be right back. Stay with us show. We've got

a problem. What who are you? It's the new mug they're selling at the David Knightshow dot com. Right, So basically a mug is something that holds liquid, right because basically you can't hold coffee with your hands. Right. I'm scat they But anyone tries to mug me, I be ready for it. You your dog faced pony soldier. They say the monk could help patriots drink coffee, then save the world. And this could be bad for us save the world, but we owe the world. These people, they're

supporting free speech with every month they buy. Come on, these people, I tell you, well, anyway, you're listening to the David Knight Show. You're listening to the David Night Show, all right. And joining us now is Christopher Willis. And Chris is a managing partner of Latitude Caribbean and a managing director of Latitude Consultancy. Has been involved in immigration industry since nineteen

ninety five. He's got a long list of credentials and organization has been in And I'm not going to go through all of that because I want to get to what is happening right now. A lot of people are very concerned about what's happening in our government here in America and the European Union and other things. There's recently, the EU has just started cracking down on people who are

trying to leave. We've also had if you've followed, I haven't really covered it, but you've got one guy that was nicknamed Bitcoin Jesus who used bitcoin to relocate to Europe. He was just arrested in Spain and is going to be extradited to the United States because the IRS is after him, saying that he transferred he didn't report all of his bitcoin holdings and things like that. So I want to talk about this. Is it something that is only for

the rich? What do people have to do if they want to do this, why would they go to particular places? And how this stuff works. So joining us now is a Chris Willis, thank you for joining us, Sir Hi David, thanks for having me on it. Yeah, And I mean it's a very interesting trend right now in the US, you know, with Americans looking at getting a second residence or citizenship because typically this wasn't on

their radar. But you know, there's been a confluence of events, you know, over the last few years that sort of led people to start looking at this as a viable option. You know, it's important to note that it doesn't necessarily mean you have to leave the US, but it's more having the option to leave should you be said, be dissatisfied with the direction of

the country's going. Obviously, it's getting, you know, closer and closer to the election, and people no matter where you sit, you know, have very strong opinions of how they'd like to see the direction of the US and if it doesn't go away, then you know, half the country is going to be unhappy. So they're looking at a different alternatives. And you've

saying this because of maybe because of taxes or stuff like that. But you know, after what happened in twenty twenty, a lot of people are looking at this and saying, and I have listeners and in Africa that said, hey, everybody here was fine with this pandemic stuff. Nobody was freaking out about it. It was the Europeans who were freaking out and the Americans who are freaking out about it. After they left, everything was fine. Well,

you raise a good point. I mean, the pandemic was really the kicker to a lot of this because you'll remember when there was the travel band, right, so it didn't matter who you were, if you only had a US passport. You know, wings were clipped and you were grounded. And so a lot of you know, particular of the family office did we lose them? The freeze up here. You've got to fix it. Okay, we're back, We're back. I froze up for a moment. We lost that last bit. What you said, you said if you only got

one passport? What was it you said after that? So the with the pandemic is people were grounded. You know, they didn't matter who you were if you only had a US passport and you weren't able to travel. And so when we're speaking to a lot of family offices, you know, the feedback they're getting from their family principles is, you know, you've got to fix this gap. You know, we were exposed here and we don't want this to be a problem again in the future if there was a similar situation.

Yeah. Yeah, And it is also important, I think in many cases to have what i'd call residential ambiguity. They tend to work with you differently if you're actually a citizen, then if you've got a different citizenship somewhere. I remember when I was in high school. I went with some friends to Europe and it was like a music organization. We were touring. But we had a day off and we decided that we're going to ride bicycles around

London. And the guy who rented the bicycles to us said, well, you're not allowed to ride these things to the park, but since you're Americans, you can probably get away with it. So we did, and we had a very angry bobby who flagged us down. He was ready to give us fines or handcuffs or whatever. We weren't doing anything crazy. I mean, we weren't trying to run people over. We were very very calm. But we're just calmly riding through. And so then as soon as we started

talking to him, he goes, oh, you're Americans. Okay, well you're not allowed to do that here. I know you didn't know that, but we'll just just walk it out of here and you'll be fine. That's the type of thing, you know, where where if you have these other residencies that can kind of give you a little bit of an out Sometimes.

I think that's what I mean by residential ambiguity. Yeah, absolutely, but I mean it makes a good point because I'll go back to the pandemic and the Caribellan in particular, most of the islands closed their borders unless you were a citizen, right, So you know, I can give you an example of someone who had a multi millions of dollars property in Jeromby Bay and Antigua and thought, you know, I'll go hang out there during the pandemic,

but never took out citizenship. So you know, he was turned away. He wasn't able to travel and go and spend time at his home. So it's it's that preparedness, and you know, to be fair, people didn't expect something of the nature of the pandemic to kick in, so they didn't really think about it. Typically, as an American, you can hop on a plane and go anywhere, right, But suddenly these these challenges put themselves on the front foot and people had to make some adjustments. Well, now

you know, I'm looking at this, this golden passport. The cost escalates to two hundred thousand dollars on EU cracked out, what is a golden passport? First of all, so it's you know, I mean the term golden passport, or you know, there's a lot of media spin on how these are portrayed. But in the Caribbean you have what's called citizenship by investment, so in exchange for making either a donation to the government or purchasing a proved

real estate, then you can receive citizenship in exchange. So what's been happening is the European Union has been making some noises about how they would like to see some enhancements, let's say, to the programs in the Caribbean, and

one of that was increasing the minimum investment level. So right now it sits at one hundred thousand US and there's been what's called a memorandum of agreement which was signed by four of the five Caribbean governments which agree to raise the floor from one hundred to two hundred thousand, and that's scheduled to be effective June thirtieth of this year. The sort of one outstanding countries indicated they will be

signing as well. So the expectation is that the minimum investment level will start at two hundred thousand instead of the current of one hundred. Wow. They're goun to double it. Wow, that's amazing. Yeah, when I was looking at this years ago, I remember looking at some of these Belize had like twenty five thousand back in the nineties and New Zealand and you had golden

passport, you get to a lot of different countries. Sometimes they would have other restrictions, but for the most part, it was just if you could put that much money into the country. Is this something that only the very rich can do? Though? Is there anything that people can do that is, you know, get citizenship somewhere without a big stash of cash. Yeah. The only other real way is through descent, and we have a division that specializes in this. So if you know, if you had ancestral links,

then that could be a pathway. And you know, I remember one client we were speaking to who was looking at the multi program in Europe, you know, which costs about a million euro give or take, and you know, having discussions with them, their surname sounded Italian, so we dug a bit deeper found out they were eligible through descent, so they got their Italian citizenship, which then gave them full access to the European Union and see a million europe right, So here was over the moon. So it's it's

another way that you can do it. But the programs we focus on David are typically you know, for your high net worth, ultra high net worth, for the mass affluent and such. There are other programs, but typically they'll have a residency component involved as well. So it's important to distinguish between residency and citizenship. So the Caribbean programs I spoke about are a direct pathway

to citizenship, so that leads to a passport. Other programs you know, very much like in the US you have a green card, right, So that type of concept would apply in places like Canada, Portugal, Spain, Greece, where you know, you have a permanent residency, but to graduate or upgrade to citizenship you have to meet certain criteria, which is typically time and daycount. Mm hmmm. So if you can get somewhere and you can afford and sometimes the cost of living is significantly less, we can talk a

little bit about that. But if you can get somewhere and establish residency, you might be able to get in without the Golden passport based on time that you're there, right, yeah, correct, I mean, and there's you know, there's a multitude of programs you know, I mean in Canada for example, where you know, especially around the US election, many Americans look

to sort of take a hop up north and spend time in Canada. So we sort of Joe Canada's immigration website crashes usually the day after the election because so many people are looking at Yeah, a lot of people promise which way the depending I know who wins half the country is going to want to get

out, Yeah, exactly. So it's one of those things that there's many other routes, but a way people could qualify, you know, whether it's through setting up a business, whether it's through a spousal relationship, whether it's through being a skilled worker for example. But for our focus, it is by investment and or by by dissent, or the two areas that we focus

on. David, I see, let me ask you this I mean is that I know a lot of people are wanting to get out of the United States because of what they've seen with the pandemic and because of what is happening with politics. But of course the same type of issues are there in Europe as well. And I guess you know this Bloomberg piece that's talking about the cost of the Golden passport soaring in the Caribbean, how it's going to double

in just a few months here. They also mentioned cryptocurrency, and that's one of the things when you have they just recently had a debate between some goldbugs and some cryptocurrency people. One of the things they were saying was, you know, that makes it easier for us to exit. But there also seems to be an attempt to crack down on that as well. Make an example out of the guy they called bitcoin Jesus. He had some cryptocurrency that he

did not declare. Evidently, that's what the i r S is alleging, and so they contacted the Spanish government to arrest him and to extradite him for the I r S over his cryptocurrency holdings. That's that's kind of a more aggressive aspect of it as well. Talk a little bit about that, and you know how the issues in terms of if you've got money to buy a citizenship or if you want to establish residency, the issues of trying to get

your money out of the jurisdiction here. Yeah, there's two elements to that. I mean, the first one is the due diligence, source of wealth, source of funds is a key component to all of these. Making sure they understand, you know, how the how your wealth was generated and that everything was done in a legal manner. What we're seeing for people who are in the in the crypto space is that you know, your crypto wallet can be used in terms of source of funds. However, they still need to

demonstrate how they acquired the funds that led to that initial crypto investment. So it's going to go in that far back just to make sure it resolved done in the proper ways. But in particular in the Caribbean, they won't accept crypto directly, so it would still have to be converted to US banking. And you know, values in the Caribbean are still very traditional, so they haven't quite advanced to that stage yet. But certainly there are opportunities for people

who have their wealth in the crypto space. And it's you know, as you rightly say, many more people are looking at this saying how can we use our crypto funds to manage this? But it's it's still evolving. Some countries have certainly said that they want to explore how they can attract the crypto market and make it as removing barriers if you like, in terms of making investment. But the key thing here, as I mentioned, is the due

diligence. So anybody who's applying for any of these programs needs to understand that not only the sources of wealth, source of funds, but you know, your personal background, what's in the public domain, everything that's advised on the forms or declared on the forms will be verified as well as final sort of international checks, you know with Interpol, Europe, poll watch list, sanctions list on all that good stuff. So it isn't just a question of here's

my money, thank you very much. You don't have to go through this process of evaluation, right right, And that's what you do. You help people go through what I imagine is a real maze of regulations, a lot of hoops and a lot of vetting and all that kind of stuff that has to go through, right Yeah. I mean the first thing is we you know, we have our first consultation where we have to understand the client, make sure we understand their motivations and their needs, and then we can suggest

which programs might be best suited. But then we have to dig a little bit deeper into the background to make sure there won't be anything that would stop them qualifying. Where are you seeing people coming from? Mostly and going to in your practice. Well, I mean we're fortunate that we you know, we've got twenty three offices around the world, so we're dealing with people with very different profiles. As we spoke about at the beginning, you know,

Americans weren't typically a major source market because you had these freedoms already. You could get on a plane and go. But if you were from Nigeria, if you were from Pakistan, if you are from South Africa, you know, you need a visa to pretty well get anywhere, right, So the mobility aspect here was key. So suddenly you were going, let's say from Pakistan, you're saying, if you're going from Pakistan and then and then froze up so you can pick up from there. Yeah, sorry about that.

So if I was going so in sitts Ina, Pakistan for example, can go to thirty nine countries visa free, and if they invest into the Caribbean, suddenly that jumps to one hundred and fifty seven, which includes you know, the Shanngan area, the UAE, Singapore, places like that. So it's the mobility. The enhancing of mobility is key for people from these reasons regions and so that's a key motivation for them. But again, if you're

American, you can go to those places anyway. The key attraction for Americans is looking to enhance their freedoms by having another option. So it's all about, you know, as many options as you can, you know, in the sort of a hotile world we're living in. And it's actually becoming a little bit more of a status symbol, you know, for many Americans.

You know, it's not the car you drive or the watch on your wrist, it's you know, what passports in your pocket, you know, and knowing that you can access different parts of the world with all this, So it's you know, it's it's becoming more mainstream as you spoke about at the beginning, and I think that's that's a key thing that as more and more

people understand what the benefits are. And for the wealthy, you know, a couple hundred thousand dollars, they'll spend that on week's holiday, right, So it's whereas you know, citizenships for life, and this is something they can pass on to their kids, you know. So it's again with a lot of the family offices, we speak to the succession planning and making sure that you know, they've got this ankle covered. You know, it's it's

a very straightforward and practical solution. Let me ask you, because you're talking about having visa requirements and things like that and being able to expand that from moving from one citizenship to another one. The visa requirements are starting to increase, as I've noticed the United States and even the EU are starting to add additional visa requirements. Talk a little bit about that, isn't I think the European Union is going to start having some visa requirements for Americans, Is that

right? Yeah, So they're going to have, like many countries have an electronic travel authority if you like, so that you still have to you you'll essentially be given it, but you have to apply right to show that you've been pre qualified to come in. So you have that in Canada, you have that for people going to the US. It's not an UNCO thing, but it's something that the EU is looking to roll out. I think they

were looking to get it out this year. It's probably rolling into twenty twenty five now with the European Union introducing this, and I think the rolling it out is what's causing them a lot of problems right now. That's why it's going to it's continually getting delayed. But what it obviously gives them is access to data, right which is being able to track people, manage people, and to ensure that any party, anybody or bad actors or undesirables. You

know, we're getting or getting picked up at these early stages. Now, you mentioned passing this on to your children. Talk a little bit about that in terms of you know, we are familiar with how you know, we have situations with open borders and immigration and you know how citizenship is essentially claimed or passed on here. What are the types of situations that you see in

other countries? I mean, is it can you is there any other country that just lets you go across the border and just kind of hang out or you know, like we do here, or is everybody all the kind of policing their borders I imagine, right, yeah, And it's getting tighter and tighter. And one of the things why the very very popular even though it's the most it's it's very expensive, you know, at about a million euro

which is not recoverable. It gives you access to the European Union and of course all the settlement rights, so even though you're a citizen of Malta, you could go, you know, live, work, study, retire in any of the other member states. So that's attractive to many people, especially an American who says, well, I want to like for like you know, so you know, the Caribbean is great, but it's not necessarily the lifestyle that I want and or having access to to resources. So that's why

Europe is always an attractive alternative. But not everybody you know, has the has the funds to do it. So the Caribbeans a nice sort of happy, happy medium. It's also geographically much closer familiar to many people, and you know, it's which is why it's it's a very popular option, especially because the processing is also much quicker, takes about six six to eight months, give or take, whereas Malta is going to take about eighteen months.

And so when somebody gets a citizenship legitimately legally in one of these countries, they can pass that on to their children generally imagine there's some Yeah, so basically if you are let's say it was you know, your nuclear family, mom, dad to kids, you know, the kids would get it. And that's not an issue. In some cases, you can include a sibling if they're unmarried and have no kids. You can include your parents or your

grandparents. You know. The family unit or the definition of a family unit can be expanded to allow more people to be included on one application. So there's each country has its own rules and how they define in dependent, but they're trying to be as competitive as possible to include as many people as they can. So let me ask you about reciprocity. You know we've been talking

about in the legal process. Here is if an American wants to get on a raft Caribbean or whatever, is there are they Is that a thing that is happening in their country? I mean, we see that happening in the EU, we see it happening in the US extensively. Is that anything that's happening in the other direction or do they clamp down on that extensively? Yeah,

it's not really, not not really. I mean you're right, you know people coming into the US. The UK is having a big issue with that right now, with people coming over from Mainland and Europe on boats and then arriving in the United Kingdom. Europe of course has had that for many years in particular with people starting their journeys in North Africa and you know, typically ending up in the southern tip of Italy. So there's there's a lot

of challenges around that. Again, it's a it's a reinforcement of the amount of migration that goes on around the world, whether through displaced people or the wealthy people are moving around, you know. But yeah, in terms of you know, the profile a person we're speaking to, you know, they're looking to give themselves as many options they need them because not everybody. You know, someone may have a citizenship in the Caribbean and they say, yeah,

it's great, I'm going to pop down. They maybe buy a house and hang out you know, a couple of months or a couple of weeks of the year, especially when it gets cold let's say up north, and then that's good enough for them. But for other people it's they want to actually move, they want to settle there, they want to live there,

and they want to raise their family theirs. So it goes back to my earlier point that you know, we need to understand the client and what the motivations are and then we can see what program is best suited for them. When somebody wants to establish residency. I mean, how complicated is that? Do they just need to Is there a legal process that you help people with with that if they don't get citizenship. Are there still issues preventing them from

buying property or something like that in many of these places? Yeah, you tend to have, you know, in some countries it's called an alien landholding tax, or they'll have additional taxes for non citizens if you're looking to go into buy varies from country to country. Many people understand the concept of buying real ESTs state. So those programs have been quite popular, but it's you know, the residency of course is there. It's not for life. You've

got to knew it or you've got to upgrade listenship. That's why a lot of people like listenship programs because it is for life. Yeah. Yeah. Let me ask you another thing too about since we're we're talking thinking momentarily here about the you know, kind of reciprocity Americans going to other countries like that. Is there anything in these other countries for political asylum for somebody that is coming from Europe or Canada or the United States or something. Do any of

them have political asylum programs or is that absolutely yeah. I mean all countries, most countries. I mean that you look at places like Canada, the United States, European countries, the UK will all, you know, look to take a certain amount of asylum seekers or refugees there per year. The biggest challenge, of course is determining are they genuine, right, and so

they'll have their own different protocols to establish that. You know, there was the Safe Third Country agreement between Canada the US for a while, which has been been adjusted, but you know, they're making sure that they can understand quickly is this a genuine refugee because part of the strategy in the past was that they would you know, get on a plane, flush their passport down, the toilet, turn up and say, you know, the only mm

hmmm h the system for four or five years right until they can be adjudicated upon. So that's that's something a lot of these countries are looking to tidy up. But with the amount of displaced people and pressures in developing countries, it's becoming you know, quite you know, quite the issue to be able to manage. Yeah, yeah, yeah, And it's pretty easy for people in a war torn country to try to make a case for political even though

they don't always get it. I would imagine it'd be a lot harder for somebody that is, you know, coming from the United States to try to make a case for a political asylum to go to you know, one of these other and I would imagine that perhaps it wouldn't even be considered in most countries that would be politically friendly to the United States. Is that true? Yeah, I mean it's the to define you know, being a person at risk and therefore eligible for asylum. It's quite a high bar to hit.

And you know the United States, someone's saying, oh, I'm being politically persecuted for my beliefs. It's again many people, you know, it's hard to say it, righty, be hard to have that provem so. But some people will try it on of course they wi't right, and you know, we've seen examples where people have have tried I think more of a prs done than anything else, you know, to say, you know, I want to be considered, but you know, it takes away from genuine refugees

who have yeah, in other countries. Yeah, we just had a case here I was talking about earlier where There was a family coming from Germany, homeschooling family, and they were given asylum about ten years ago because the Germans is going to take away their they're Christians, they went homeschool the kids. Germans are going to take away their kids. They got asylum here, but because the change in political regime, the Biden administration decided that they wanted to

deport them, so that became something of an issue. So that's always the case. And I guess if you get political asylum somewhere, it's always subject to the whims of whatever the current political regime is. I guess that's kind of a shaking absolutely. It's you know, and I've worked with people with his profile in the past, and you know, when you're speaking to a genuine asylum seeker or a genuine refugee, I mean you understand the difference.

You know, what they've gone through and how they should be afforded protection as opposed to some people who are just sort of trying it on and hoping for the best, because you know, for people like you and I, it's unimaginable. Yeah, yeah, it is. And so you know, if somebody can afford to do it, it is certainly going to be going up quite a bit in just the next few months, are going to be doubling it. So there's a there's always seems like there's a constantly closing window on

all these different things that are happening everywhere. Even if it is open for you at this point in time, it may be closing pretty soon. Is there anything else that you would tell us that we didn't cover about this that I think people be interesting? I mean, you touched on a good point because Canada just you know, closed up their self employed category with a day's

notice. You know, Ireland and the UK have done similar things. Portugal change their program, So there's there's you're right, if you qualify today and it's something you want to do, you know, don't delay too long because the goalposts could change, and you know, we're expecting, you know, potentially changes the government in the United Kingdom, in Canada and the United States this year, right, so that could change you know the direction of those

three countries and therefore the immigration policies as well. You know, we're also seeing pressures from the European Union in the Caribbean and in other jurisdictions, so again that could impact their policy making decisions as it relates to immigration, and as we've seen in the US, immigration is always key political topic when it comes to elections. So my advice to people is, if you qualify today, you know, get it done. It's in your back pocket, you

know you've got it. You know better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it, right, So get that done, tucked away, and then if things changed, then at least you've taken care of yourself and your family. Yeah. Yeah, certainly, we don't see freedom increasing anywhere in the globe and everybody it seems to be closing everything down. So if you've got any plans, and now's the time to make your

preparations because it seems like globally everything is shutting down. Even the Caribbean, they're shutting stuff down. That's amazing. But it's very interesting to talk to you about that. And thank you so much for what you do. Christopher Willis again Latitude Caribbean and Latitude Consultancy, and tell us your website here. I'm looking at the website and a Latitude world dot com. Is that the best place to find you? We're looking for it. Absolutely, Yeah,

Latitude World dot com. You go into the team find my details. Please reach out and be happy to have a conversation to see how we can help you. That's great. Thank you very much, Chris. Great talking to you. Very interesting folks. Will be right back. Stay with us, the common Man. They created common Core and dumbed down our children. They created common Past to track and control us. They're Commons project to make sure

the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, not sophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.

Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. D Davidknightshow dot com. Well, it's always interesting. Again. It's something that is extremely expensive. If you have a high net worth, it's something you may want to consider but as global governance is being ushered in, it's cutting down more and more the

difference between different jurisdictions. But there still will be a difference there. As I said, sometimes if you've got residential ambiguity, if you're a citizen of

another country, or you can pull that, that might buy you a little bit of grace. Who knows. I want to talk a little bit about the pandemic issues here, and I mentioned this. Of course, we've now gone a full twenty four hours without me seeing a new article about the pandemic bird flu and how you should be afraid of all this, But I just wanted to pass this on. I was very concerned about how they keep pushing

this and we'll do the same thing with other so called pandemics. And so I took what I said yesterday about the questions about bird flu, that you should be asking questions about the actions of the USDA and the FDA coming after our food supply with this stuff and wanting to vaccinate every single farm animal. That is a big plan for the big pharmaceutical companies. And so I wanted to put this up on substack. We did that as a separate article,

and I also put at the top to the mike. If you find this useful, take it, copy it. I don't care if you give me attribution for it or not. But I think we need to get people to start thinking critically about this stuff. So the questions that I had yesterday, things like why are they focusing on cows well because of the meat and dairy are If they're going to look in cow's milk, why aren't they looking in

the chickens eggs and this type of stuff? Right if they want to try to scare people about the food supply, why wouldn't you scare people about the eggs if you're talking about bird food and you're killing chickens. And why are they're not looking at chicken meat? Why are they looking at cow meat? Why are they looking specifically at ground beef rather than looking at steaks? A lot of these types of things. So I got a whole list of questions

that you'll see there on substack. I'm not going to read them to you again, even questions about the so called transmission to other animals, transmission to humans? Is any of this stuff real? And so I think there's some things there. Grab those put them up on social media. If you want. You know, it's important to let people know about the show if you

find it to be helpful. But it's also important to just as an individual, ask these questions, why aren't you looking at the product the food products from chickens if it's bird flow, why are you looking at the beef? Is it because you want to ban meat and dairy? You know that type of thing, which is a rhetorical question, but we need to popularize that, I think. So that's one of the reasons why I put that up

on substack. As we look at the pandemic treaty. Of course, it was good to see that Senator Ron Johnson and Wisconsin who has been the boldest. Again, I'd like to see these people do more, but I'll give him credit for doing more than anybody else has done. He's had several hearings where he's brought in people who are vaccine injured. He's gone far, far beyond anything that anybody else has done in terms of pushing back against this bioweapon,

the vaccine and things like that. On Rumble, Freakin says American farmers need to start spraying poop on politicians. Ousis well, that's probably gonna come. If they start doing this, we'll have to see what happens with it. But that's almost like Cole's to Newcastle, isn't it. They are already pure Bolshevik. But Ron Johnson is concerned about this power play by the WHOW and so he has contacted other GOP senators and he's done a good job.

He has gotten all forty nine GOP senators to essentially sign a letter to call on Biden to withdraw support for the WHO pandemic treaty, not to which support for the WHO. I mean, that's maybe a bridge too far. They can't get that done. But at least if they're going to put forward another treaty, they need to know that this is going to be down partisan lines, and even if any Democrats don't defect on this, there's still going to

be nine votes short of what they need for ratification. And yet, when I saw this headline, it concerned me because I thought, why are they calling on Biden? Why don't they just put together a letter and say, oh, by the way, anything that you send to us is going to be dead on arrival. And so I wanted to see exactly what they had said to them about this and here's what they said. This is Center Ron

Johnson tweeting this out. He said, two international agreements are being considered at this month's World Health Assembly that surrenders US sovereignty to the who spot on exactly right. He says the President should reject them, or at least admit any agreement to the Senate as a treaty. Wait a minute, he doesn't have to submit it as a treaty. You need to call him out that it's a treaty. And so I think this is something, you know, we

talk about action items again. Send these questions about this this bird flu narrative, you know, put these questions around on social media. That's going to have more effect, I think than anything that you can do to send to elected officials. However, they do look at the volume of things that they get, and I think at this point in time, it would be very useful for us to remind them that under the Constitution, any treaty is a is required to be voted on by the Senate, and it is a treaty.

Whether whether Biden calls it a treaty and gives it to them or not, it is a treaty, a treaty is an agreement between these different countries, and that's what they're trying to negotiate there. I know that when we were talking about this before, some people said, well, this is you know, this is something that is Is this a WHO treat or we make it a treaty with a WHO, because you can't make a treaty with a non governmental organization. But what the what the WHO is doing is it is

the coordinator. And so what it is saying is that all of these countries have agreed on this agenda or on this whatever they want to call it. They call it a variety of different things. They had the North American Free

Trade Agreement that was a treaty. You can call it an agenda, as they did the Paris Climate Agenda, and but it's always a treaty and so and what the WHO is doing is organizing, facilitating, and they're they're presenting it as an agreement as a treaty between all these different countries that are there. And so it needs to be called out the people in the Senate.

And I would start by sending stuff to Senator Johnson, Senator Ron Johnson, who organized this stuff, that they need to call this out and they need to say that anything that is an international agreement has to be ratified by the Senate as a treaty, because that's what it is. And afterward was that the climate agreement at Paris was that. And it is an absolute crime that

you didn't have Mitch McConnell basically shut that thing down. He was there from twenty fifteen to not say we're going to have a vote on the Paris Climate Accord. For John Kerrey to say Barack Obama and I have self ratified this, that's absolute nonsense. That's why I said, we don't want to see that happen again with a pandemic treaty. So they got forty nine people, all Republicans against it. But do they have the backbone to stand and call it what it is, which is a treaty, and to say that we

have to ratify it. It isn't getting together and passively asking Biden to do it. That's a very bad strategy. It's like a president saying, well, I really would like for the Supreme Court to do this or that. No, you do it yourself. You've got the use the powers that you've got instead of just virtue signaling and saying I really care. You know, we've got this hearing, we've got this letter. No, you are the ones who need to vote on this stuff. Don't pass the buck off to

somebody else. And so the who, the who has a wha, the whah, the what? I wonder if they got a win as well, they've got a whif the World Economic Form the WHA is the decision making body of this non governmental abomination. That's all we should start calling them, stead of an organization abomination, the NGO, that the Sovereignty Coalition. But out of statement about this said, the term Pandemic accord is used for the Pandemic

Treaty. And again these are semantics, they are synonyms and they are the same thing. So we need to understand that. Meanwhile, in Canada, we have a Christian chiropractor who is fighting a sixty five thousand dollars fine because he refused to wear a mask. And this was you know, the mask rules were back in twenty twenty and last year these rules were nullified by a court, and yet still his medical college is coming after him for sixty five

thousand dollars because we refuse to wear a mask. These were this is not a law, it was a rule, it was ruled null and void by court, and yet they're still trying to hit him with a sixty five thousand dollars fine. And so the sixty five thousand dollars question is why why he says he's being targeted because he is quote a Christian man of integrity and principle

and refuses to abide by these rules. That's why, I think, because it's only going to be people like him, people of integrity, people who are not living for the moment right here, are taking the longer view. It's only going to be people like that who are going to lay everything on the line to push back for freedom. He is a Christian man of integrity and principle, attributes that make him a target for government overreach in the era

of COVID. That's right, and so he was, You're always going to be targeted for that, and it doesn't it's not going to be limited just to this. But be proud of that fact, because it's only people like that that are going to change this world. We got enough spineless politicians,

we don't need any more of them. We got enough virtue signaling, we don't need any more of that he was a practicing physician in Calgary in twenty twenty, and he went up against Alberta's public health orders chose not to wear a mask during patient visits. Most of his patients also chose not to wear masks during their visits, which quickly drew the ire of the College of Chiropractors of Alberta, which mandated that all chiropractors wear masks. This is not even

a governmental organization. This is like a trade guild or whatever. It's like the AMA or something, mandating that everybody's going to wear it and then assessing a fine to him, which I find that to be absolutely amazing. They never alleged by the way that he got sick, or that anybody got sick, or that anybody died, showing that they were wrong about this the entire time. So legally, medically, they don't have a leg to stand on, and yet they persist, and so we have to persist as well.

He's going to fight them tooth and nail, and we all need to fight that as well. We're going to take a quick break and when we come back, we're going to talk a little bit about some other climate issues. So stay with us. We'll be right back. As your news been censored, banned, censored, banned, over and over again, has vital information been held prisoner by mainstream and anti social media. It's the duty of every

thinking person to make the great escape to the Davidnightshow dot com. There you'll find links to live streams, videos, audio podcasts, and support links. Live stream the show at d Live and every Monday through Friday nine am Eastern, Videos at bit shoot and huge Tube. New audio podcast The Real David Night Show at Podbean, iTunes, Stitcher, iHeart and more. But even though there's a light at the end of the tunnel, without your support,

the show will run out of gas. The links to support the show are at the Davidnightshow dot com. To donate via subscribe Star, donate via or donate via cash app, Bitcoin or po box. Are sincere things to all of you who have stood with us to get this fall. Please don't forget to share the links and pray for the country as well as our family. On rumble grant seven seven seven seven, I have one question for David. How do you do this every day? It does get tiring, I got

to say, and I'm not getting any younger. But I'm able to do it because of your support. So we really do appreciate your support, and that's what's necessary to keep the program going, because I gotta have that coffee in the morning to get me going. But it does help to have a routine, and Karen is a great deal of help in that routine. On rumble, no truth in them rights. Any military training will tell you without a complete airlock seal around your face, you might as well not wear anything.

Oh yeah, I know, I know. I was saying that at the very beginning because Karen and I had just gone snorkeling, and for the first time since I was a teenager, I went snorkeling using a mask and it didn't work at all with my beard, and so I said that to me, wise, even if you think that this is you know, typically a mask is going to seal the water out, but not with a beard. So I said, it's absolutely ridiculous to wear one of these things.

And of course we talked about the fact that airborne virus, from what they say of a virus, it's so small that it's like trying to stop mosquitoes by using one of these chain link fences. Right, It's ridiculous. And then we saw several individuals, one of them a doctor and hailing or getting a breath of vape and then blowing it out through the mask. They went out through all the different sides and through the mask as well. We're having

quite a thunderstorm here. I don't know if we're going to lose power or not, but just so you know, I've got quite a thunderstorm going on here. The whole thing was a bunch of nonsense. And then finally, you know, after everybody pointed out, well, you know, you don't have any definition of what a mask is, and even an N ninety five mask is not going to stop airborne viral particles. Oh but what it's going to do. Is this going to stop the particles that are going to be

on spital It's like, no, it isn't. As a matter of fact, they had determined and there was a study going back to two thousand and two that and it was it was in Australia. It was the scientist who said that she discovered the parvo virus and SARS first came out back in two thousand and two, the first time anybody was talking about that much, and there was actually a law I believe it was in New South Wales, and

they said we're gonna and it was pretty stiff fine. It was something like one hundred thousand Australian dollars or something to anybody who sold these N ninety five masks and marketed them as something that was going to stop a virus. They said, that is patently fraudulent and we're going to hit you with a big fine. And then twenty years later you got people like Gladysburg Bear Jicklian who was locking people up and finding them if they don't wear this ridiculous mask.

And the woman who did that back in two thousand and two, she talked to a lot of medical professionals about whether or not they use masks during operations and things like that, and are we still on? I heard some crackling anyway. She said that what she found with her experiments was that after somebody had worn a mask for twenty minutes, it was so saturated with spittle that

the process of you speaking would push those particles out. They would be smaller, though, so they would travel farther and they would remain airborne longer, so it actually exacerbated things. She said, if you're gonna wear one of these things, you can't wear for more than twenty minutes. And by the way, we had Osha saying the same thing about these masks. You're going to create respiratory issues for the people who wear them if they wear them for

longer than twenty minutes. We're going to mandate that you wear these in some dusty environments, not for viral particles, but for dust particles that were bigger. We're going to mandate that you wear this. But if we mandate that you wear you've got to let people out every twenty minutes, give them a

break so they can take that mask off, because it is unhealthy for them. So yeah, we saw that in many different ways. Rogue Statesman, thank you very much on Rumble for the tip. I appreciate that. And also in Rumble, Boondock eighty four has become a social anxiety kind of comfort blanket or something. Yeah, it has. It is, you know, like wearing a T shirt that says the David Knight Show, except just the opposite, right, just the opposite of that. Let's talk a little bit

about climate. We have the Scottish National Party which has been doing one absurd thing after the other, whether it's censorship or tranny issues that got Nicola Sturgeon kicked off, and then they replaced her with this guy who his parents were immigrants. He absolutely hated white people. He talked about how much he hate the fact that everywhere he goes in Scotland there's white people. They've made him

the Prime Minister of Scotland. So now they've got this precious little thing that they're doing there, and they got us special kind of fuel that they want to use. They've got some engines for their ferries and they spell it with the fe r r i e s. But I would imagine it equally applies to the we folk, the fairies that they imagine all this carbon dioxide and all the rest of the stuff, the unicorns, the ferries, all the rest of the stuff. But for the fairies that they use to transport people

in cars from one island to the other. They have them as dual fuel engines, and they want to run them on liquefied natural gas as well as conventional diesel. But it's very important for them to use liquefied natural gas and so they can virtue signal about the complexity of these things that they can now

operate them using LNG instead of diesel. The problem is is that this LNG has to be imported eight thousand miles and to get it there so that they can use it for their virtue signal, they have to transport it eight thousand miles, this green fuel from Cutter. They have to transport it the entire

way by ships and by trucks that use guess what, diesel. This is the absurdity of the eco cult that they're going to go to the expense of having a dual fuel engine LLNG or diesel and then we want to use the LNG, so we'll use diesel engines to transport this eight thousand miles, put it on our ferry where we're going to go, you know, less than

a mile across this thing here, Absolute absolute idiocy. The Scottish government says there's no clear date for when they will have LNG tanks or bunkering facilities, so they have to ship it by diesel powered ships all the way from Cutter to England and then drive it an additional four hundred and fifty miles to Scotland again using diesel trucks, so that they don't have to use diesel fuel on the ferries and do this engine is more complicated. It's caused all kinds of

delays and expenses. This is how insane this is. And then we look at General Motors CEO Mary Bearra says that they are committed to China despite one hundred and six million dollars in quarterly losses. I think the stockholders of GM need to get Mary Barrett committed and take her off and a straight jacket with a sleeve tied behind there. That's what they needed. She's absolutely lunatic crazy.

She's committed to fail. There's absolutely no way that they are going to be able to continue as a company if they have to make this stuff in China. That is not a successful strategy. Trump was right about the fact he said it's going to be a bloodbath with these electric vehicle companies because China has got the raw materials. They've got the raw materials, and even more importantly, because of the Paris Accord, the Paris Treaty, they have the

cheap energy. They can use coal to manufacture. We can't. So every manufacturing concern, whether you're making cars or you're making solar panels, or whether you're making steel, Nobody in Europe or the United States is going to be able to compete against China because they've been given cheap energy. Same thing with India, they've been given that as well. And GM has already had their head handed to them when they tried to set up a car manufacturing ventures in

China as well. Before they started all this electric vehicle stuff, they decide they were going to make a car that was tailored to the demands and what they wanted in the Chinese market, meaning that it was going to be smaller, it's going to be cheaper, that type of thing. They came up with plans, they had a factory that they were tooling up, and then Low and Behold, a couple of months before they introduced their product, an

exact replica of it had been stolen and manufactured in another Chinese plant. Because that's a big part of the China price intellectual property theft by these Chinese Communist Party members who have a controlling interest in every country every company that is allowed to do business there. So what they did was they stole the plans Verba and did their own knockoff version of it and sold it cheaper than GM did,

and so they haven't learned anything at all from that experience. GM's market share in China, including its joint ventures, has plummeted from roughly fifteen percent as recently as twenty fifteen to eight point six percent last year, the first time it has dropped below nine percent since two thousand and three. But they will. They think that they're going to be able to survive in the EV

market by moving there and elsewhere. In the UK at the Telegraph has reported that they want a thirty billion dollar project being recommended by an organization sending a report to the government. They have recommended Energy Systems Catapult ESC has recommended that the British government commit thirty billion pounds to pull CO two out of the air

and to sequester it and underground facilities. And so guess what they are going to be selling them the machines and the facilities and all the rest of the stuff. But when you talk about thirty billion dollars in the UK, that's a lot of money even for Americans. And that's billion with a B. I'm not getting this mixed up. That's billion with a B. That's a lot of money even in America, but it is a huge amount for the

UK. They don't have as large an economy, and so you know, they want to pull CO two out of the air pumping in underground facilities. What a ridiculous idea. In the first place, there's not that much CO two in the atmosphere, and all of this stuff about greenhouse gases is absolute, total nonsense. But they are needed by plants, so every bit of this is absolutely insane. But they pushed in the report, they pushed the fear factor. Without this, and without doing this at scale, we risk

non compliance with our net zero requirement. So we got to do it because the Paris Treaty requires this. That's what I'm saying. It's very important that we not let them play that same game with us with the pandemic thing. We can't allow them to presume that this is a controlling legal document and then also at the same time presume that it is not a treaty. But they do that kind of stuff all the time with a bureaucracy. Oh well,

you know, this is not a law, but it's a rule. And with a rule, you don't get presumption of innocence, protection against successive fines. You don't get a due process of any way, shape or form. On rumble Freakan says little kids trying to play in the park in Toronto, but their psycho parents had them massed up. Yeah, that's right, and I don't is that still going on that you mentioned it? Have them massed up, so that may still be going on. Georgia boy loven forty two.

Ride the Lightning, David, Yeah, it is lightning around here a lot, as absolutely once Sarah b said it's just a money scheme and a

power grab. It always is. Every one of these things is so as they talk about the thirty billion dollars that they do, they say, well, we got to make sure that these plants that are sucking the CO two out of the air, we've got to make sure that today are going to be powered by wind or solar energy, maybe even nuclear, except they're shutting down the nuclear power plants, and that in of itself should tell you that

they're not concerned about greenhouse gases, because that's one thing that isn't an issue with nuclear. It's all a fraud. Now we're going to send the fuel eight hundred thousand, eight thousand miles by diesel, so we don't use diesel here. Thank you for joining us. Have a good day. The David Night Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Night Show, please do your part and try not

to spread it. Financial support, or simply tell the others about the show causes this stage. There's information to spread. Father. People have to trust me, I mean trust the science. Wear you ask, take your vaccine, don't ask questions using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show.