Wed 24Apr24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show. As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Wednesday, the fourth of April. He're of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, we're going to begin today by taking a look at the twenty fifth anniversary of the Columbine shooting. That was the first major school shooting, and it happened a couple of days ago.

I haven't covered it until today because today or watcha yesterday, we had a law pass in Tennessee to allow teachers to carry There's a lot of details and qualifications and training required for that, but of course the Democrats don't like that. But there's a lot of lessons to learn from what happened in Columbine. We've got a clip. We're going to begin with the one of the individuals who survived, whose sister was perhaps the most famous one who was shot.

He escaped, but we're going to begin with that. I'm also going to take a look at the failing climate agenda. People are realizing how this is going to destroy things, and they're pushing back really hard. So now we got the World Health Organization trying to pull in doctors. I wonder why.

Seems like they were able to pull the wall over our eyes pretty easily with this medical martial law, so maybe they could be useful for this too, right Another mcguffin unified mcguffin back well, as I just said, the

twenty fifth anniversary of Columbine, and the brother of one of the people was probably the most famous of the victims where they pointed the gun at her told her to she is a strong Christian. They knew that and told her to deny God and she refused to do it. But her brother was also in the library where most of the killing took place, and he and his family have been spending the last twenty five years going around and talking to students to

try to prevent this. And he has some very interesting perspectives on what he has seen in schools as well as what he saw that day. And so, in an interview with Billy Halliwell, who is with CBS News, he said, I've dedicated a lot of my life to sharing my sister's story, my story traveling around and speaking His sister, Rachel Joyce Scott, was killed during the event, and so he said they talked about forgiveness, they talked about who is really to blame? You know, how do we sort these

types of things out? Is it really about bullying, because that really has been the foundation for a lot of things, right, all of this grooming that is happening now, interestingly enough, is being justified of the satanic actions of a couple of killers. And that's really what it was they got He says, they got into a very dark place. Well, it was a very occultic place, quite frankly that they got into. Wasn't just that they

withdrew and brooded and that type of thing. So I when I began with his recounting of the event, here is his Here's Scott's version of the story. Yeah, I mean you mentioned your friend who died next to you. You were in the library, you saw and experienced some of the most horrific things imaginable, particularly for a teenager a kid at the time. You know, it was horrific for the entire country. You went through it coming out

of that. When it comes to forgiveness, right, we talk a lot about forgiveness and our culture, maybe not enough, but the word gets thrown around a lot. But you really have had to deal with that. How did you get to a place of forgiveness. What was that journey like for you? Coming out of a situation where twelve kids a teacher killed by their peers. It's just horrific. Yeah, a lot of times, you know. Just recap a little bit about what I went through. I was in

the library, which was the scene of the most intense shooting. I watched as the shooters went around the room taunting students and treated it like it was a game. And they came over to where I was. I saw my friend Isaiah, they call them racial slurs. The tried to pull him out from underneath the table. They killed him. Then they killed my friend Matt, and they left me underneath that table. I thought I was going to die, and I felt that I heard God speak to me, and I

am careful even with that phrase. God told me to do something because I know that my own thinking can get in the way of that still small voice that's within. But I felt very strongly and impressed that a voice that was all knowing wise and told me to get out of there. I was the first student to stand up, looked down around the room. I saw the shooters were gone, and I yelled at everyone let's get out of here.

A group of us ran out. There's a police car outside. We all got behind the police car, and shortly after the shooters came back into the library and began to exchange gunfire with the police. Behind the police car, I was holding a girl who had been shot. Her name was val Schnurr, and she had a conversation with the shooters just minutes earlier where they were. One of them walked by her and she said, oh God, and it caught his attention. He said, God, you believe in God?

And had this conversation between the two of them where she was begging for her life, and finally she said she did. She said yes, and then I heard a shotgun. But she survived. And I'm and I'm holding her behind this police car, trying not to let her go to sleep. It's amazing what kicks in, you know, you think we're more resilient than we realize. Sometimes things automatically kick in that you don't even know. I mean, I'm sixteen years old, just turned sixteen, and I'm holding and all

I knew all of a sudden, it just came to me. You don't let someone who's losing blood go to sleep. You're also I'm in total shock, which is your brain's way of kind of protecting you from the gravity of what you're dealing with. So you're in total shock. It feels surreal.

When I was in the library, I was completely paralyzed with fear, and and it was it was less than ten minutes, but it felt like, uh, it felt like, you know, hours that I was in there, because those seconds just are so long, and you're you're totally aware of every you're You're just in this very crazy, crazy place. What what I What I've learned about forget you know you ask about forgiveness is, you know, a lot of times we don't realize we need forgiveness, Like we're angry

about something we don't know sometimes what it is. We're carrying around some some stuff from our past and our anger for and I didn't realize it, But for years I was. I was for years I was angry. And I hated the shooters. I mean I would. The reason I hated them is because the news got to the overall reason wrong why the shooting happened, Not because they were intentionally trying to, but everybody wanted to know why. And

this story came out that's just not true. And the story is these guys are pushed to the edge with being bullied at school so bad they got revenge. And that was the overall story that came out from Columbine. Even the psychologists and everybody in the community, everyone that's learned about Columbine realizes that's not what happened. That had to be frustrating, you know, to continue to hear that even now, that still comes up, right, you know,

as the primary reason. A lot of people go back to that media narrative and that's all they really know of the reasons. Yeah, so that is, that's a false narrative, and it's not the reason why Columbine happened. It's a minor, smaller factor. It's a factor, but it's a smaller factor. And in fact, that caused in the mind of American psyche, a bad formula that's existed for twenty five years, and we need as a country, need to get rid of that formula. And the formula is,

oh, you've been bullied at school, look out a school. You could do a school shooting. Well, that is so wrong, because that's that's the equivalent of you stepped on my toe. I'm going to cut off your limbs. Yeah, and that's exactly all this time. We have seen the cover up here in Tennessee of what this tranny killer did in that Christian school. It truly is amazing to me. They want to hide all that stuff, They want to hide the evil that is in there. And then of

course we've got people very angry, the Democrats. You had one of the Tennessee Three, one of the people who interrupted the proceedings there at the house before. He has a bunch of protesters there. They staged a die in, and we'll talk about that. But you notice that he says, well, it wasn't what we were told. So what does he think the reason this happened is this is a little bit shorter. I'll tell you what he says about the reason why. And so you asked, well, why did

Columbine happened? I don't have all the reasons. I can't tell you everything, but I have learned a lot, and I can't tell you that that I what I've after everything I've learned. As far as people are concerned, the biggest people responsible are the two shooters. It's not it's not the school. It's not people that maybe treated them bad. It's not their parents, it's not the medication they were on, it's not the guns that they got.

It's the choices that they made in their in their heart to just to get into a dark place to choose to kill and uh and and choices that they made to lie to not not do the things that they are going to say they're going to do to all kinds of things. So, you know, even as a teenager when I watched them on the news, I remember and they were older than me, they were a couple of years older than

me, and I thought they knew what they were doing. They were planning on it, They planned it, They planted Eric specifically planned it for over a year, so very sick and twisted, dwelling on the darkest thoughts that you could have, having these dark fantasies of being in power and showing the world your anger and your rage, and just this very egotistical, very arrogant fantasy and that Eric had. And then there were two different kids. And

I've learned a lot about and I say kids. One was seventeen when I was eighteen. But they just like other shooters of shootings, they knew what they were doing was so wrong. Yeah, yeah, perhaps that's why they don't want us to see the manifesto there in Nashville. But then what about forgiveness? Because he had asked him about that, and as he said, you know, they are to blame. So what do you do with that? Does he move on with that? What do you do about the forgiveness

aspect of this? So but back to the issue of forgiveness. Forgiveness is like setting a prisoner free and finding out that prisoner is you. So you have all this anger and you and you realize forgiveness is what sets you free from that. Forgiveness is a spiritual issue, and people a lot of times misunderstand it. They think that forgiveness is saying, oh, it's okay what

you did. Now. Sometimes that it is when you when you're meant to be in relation and connection with somebody, you forgive them and you forget what they did, and you say it's okay, and you give them grace, you give them mercy. But sometimes something happens from someone and it's not okay. It's completely wrong and evil or whatever you want to call it. And at that point, it's not about saying it's okay, so you and there's it's saying I'm going to choose to let go, and it's for your sake.

Forgiveness most of the time is for you. It's for you. That's that's the essence of it. Is a forgiveness is a freeing thing. And people don't realize, well they because what happens is you go, well, I have a right to be angry. Yes you do. It's for some

things that have happened. You can either hold on to that right and it let it eat you inside and it then comes out in different ways, usually on people that you don't intend it to go out onto or onto yourself, or you are living in torment in your mental health, or you have an attitude of forgiveness and choose to let go. So I forgave the shooters at Columbine, but I would not pardon them. Pardon is a different is an

issue of the law. If they had not killed themselves that day, I would have I would I believe that they belonged in prison so that they couldn't do that again until exactly And so we've had situations, We've had people like son of Sam Keller. You have ted Bundy who raped and killed so many people. They went to prison and Ted Bundy was executed son of Sam Guy what was his name Berkovic or David Berkovitch or something like that. He is

still in prison, will be there for life. They don't have the death penalty there. Both of them said they became Christians and in prison God can forgive. There's still consequences there. You still are in prison the rest of your life, or you are executed. That type of thing. That's what he's talking about in terms of no pardon and God gives us consequences in our own lives. We can see that in the life of David, who committed

adultery, who committed murder, attempted to cover it up. There were consequences for him his entire life, and yet he was forgiven by God. The problem is, I think, when we look at this, how do you stop the crime? Oh, you lock these people up, put them in prison, or you execute them or something like that, But how do you

stop the ongoing crimes? Because we've had not just school shootings, the crimes that happened during twenty twenty and twenty twenty one and so forth under this medical martial law, the mass murder in hospitals, the crimes against people in terms of stealing all of their livelihood and destroying the business that they've built with their blood, sweat and tears, the destruction of the rule of law, the moving of the overton windows, so the people will accept, well, yeah,

I guess I do need to have a digital ID. And that is really what is happening now. Is an article coming out of Australia today, we'll get to where they've just passed this new digital ID law calling it voluntary, and yet it's not voluntary for a lot of people. As a person said, well, if it's not voluntary for everybody, it's not voluntary for anybody really, And so they're strong arming and people to take that because why

are we putting up with this? This is so against the character of Australians to do this type of thing, just as it should be against the character the historical character of Americans to submit to this kind of stuff. And yet they were able, with these lines of the pandemic to move this over to a window. So we'll gradually start to accept this stuff. So that's the key when you look at this, what is what do we do to stop this. This is why I have been told so many times, and it

is a real sore spot with me. Well, you just need to move on and forget about Trump. It's like, well, I'll move on and forget about Trump, and Trump moves on. If Trump is going to come back remain in power, if Biden is going to stay and remain in power, we have to tell people what they have done to move on from these people, Trump and Biden, is to move on from these two killers at Columbine and just to say, oh, okay, well you know, let's

just let's just forget about it. That was four years ago. Come on, let's there's other things happening. Let's forget about it. That's twenty five years ago. You know, these guys being their forties. Now, he was sixteen, he was a couple of years younger than the oldest one. He's forty one. Let's just forget about it. Just just let them walk around free. No, you stop the killing, you stop the crime.

So how's the best way to do that in a high school? Wells, I said many times with every one of these school shootings, the best thing that you can do. There's no perfect solution, but the best solution that you can have is to have concealed carry by teachers that are there, because as we've seen in the recent stabbing that happened in the Australian mall, I think the first person killed was a uniformed security guard who became a target for

this guy. This guy wanted to kill people, so first thing he does is get rid of the security guard. Then he starts killing women, and then finally the people who are running from the killer find a cop, a female and she's got a gun. They tell her to go stop this guy and she heroically runs over to stop him. But the thing that allowed her to stop him was the gun that she had, and so that's a heroic

act. She was not being threatened. If you have a situation in a school classroom, remember there was a teacher who died besides twelve students I think. And if you are there and somebody attacked is attacking you or attacking the students that are there, that's just self preservation and you need to have the

ability to do that. And so at least have they can still surprise you and shoot you before you can react, of course, but there's at least a possibility that if they don't blindside you on this, you've got an opportunity to fight back on somewhat level playing ground, perhaps better if you have, under this Tennessee law been in so you're a better shot. The Tennessee House passes a bill to arm trained teachers amid protests and a performative die in is

the way Tom Peppert does. The headline performative. It was theatrics. Just like earth Day fifty four years ago. I talked about yesterday, there's people doing die ins and everything and nothing really changes. This is the left. This is the theatrical left. It was. It was the people who were the ones who were always in the plays and all this other kind of stuff, who loved to perform. They were the ones who were so into earth Day fifty four years ago. And this is what's happening here as well.

You've got Justin Jones, one of the twenty one of the Tennessee three, who has been at the forefront of these displays and everything. And that's why he got elected, by the way, Yeah, he was a performer at these protests and everything that got him elected. And he's still doing that,

not so much offering bills as he is just offering performances. The Tennessee House of Representatives yesterday approved a bill that would armed teachers who were licensed receive annual training not just once but every year, and are approved by both police and school officials. There's a lot licensing. You approved by multiple people. You're

training all the time. The protest threatened to interrupt the legislative body's proceedings multiple times, with Justin Jones, who was actually I I hesitate to call him a representative, but he does represent a certain constituency, doesn't He and a staffers at times joining the protests in theatrics, and so sixty eight to twenty eight was the bill passing. He was ruled out of order at least three times on Tuesday, including when he walked to the front of the Assembly and

used his phone to record lawmakers and protesters. Because he was repeatedly ruled out of he will not be allowed to speak on the House floor until thirsty. They've got to come up with some better punishments with these guys. They kicked them out when they bullhorned and had a mob insurrection taking over the capitol,

and then immediately he was reinstated by his jurisdiction that the politician's there. He says, I'm the only one who is officially ruled out of order for video recording my constituents being removed from the gallery by state troopers and now will be silenced for the next two days. The video he posted social media seems to feature the lawmaker or another person standing very close him, chanting blood on your hands, blood on your hands. Now, this is about defending innocent life.

If they got butt on their hands, they got butt on their hands. Taken down. A purp video of the full event shows the House Speaker Cameron Sexton repeatingly urging him to stop recording and sit down, but he won't. E chected him and did measures. But you know, and have any consequences. How dare them have consequences for this stuff? They must be racist? As proponents previously highlighted the stringent requirements that requires for guns to be carried

on school property. State Senator Paul Bailey, who sponsored the version of the bill that already passed in the state Senate. So now the only thing left is for the governor to sign it. I'm sure he probably will, predicted that the requirement would lead to this passing and getting the signature from Billy.

He said. In order to carry weapons on school grounds, they have to possess a valid handgun carry permit issued by this state, must be fingerprinted, and must pass a psychological evaluation, be vetted by school officials and all the rest of the stuff, and train annually forty hours minimum annually. So I really don't have a problem with that. You know, we want to talk about murder and what is happening across our country with murder, and of course

with children. I think the most amazing story of mass murder, perhaps longest period of time, it's planned parenthood. It's now the one of the top four leading causes of death, right up there with heart attack and cancer.

They had six hundred ninety five thousand Americans died from heart disease in twenty twenty one, six hundred and five thousand from cancer, four hundred and sixteen thousand, they said from COVID nineteen, mostly medical protocols, and two hundred twenty five thousand from accidents, and planned parenthood is right there, just under four hundred thousand, just under four hundred thousand. So only heart disease and cancer

are killing more people than and what they claimed with COVID nineteen. And again we look at COVID nineteen and they're not looking at the hospital death protocols, and they're certainly not counting all the people that were killed with the Trump shots. Where does that fit? You know, that might be the number one

killer in twenty twenty one, because that's when the vaccines rolled out. You remember that, You remember that the one America insurance company out of Indiana said, we had an event that was more than three sigmas out from the standard deviation of the mean. We don't see this type of stuff but like once every two hundred years. And he said it wasn't COVID, it was not COVID, and it began in the third quarter and then increased again in the

fourth quarter. Could it be the shot that was then pressured on everybody? Oh, it wasn't mandated, it was coerced. Well yes, but of course he says, well, we know that you don't die if you get the shot, and this wasn't COVID. But he says, I think it was COVID, even though everybody said it wasn't COVID. It was all these different things that they attribute it to and perhaps attributing it to heart attacks and things like that. But he says, I know that it was COVID,

even though they said it wasn't COVID. The people who are there said it wasn't COVID. But he knows better because he's the insurance guy. Now, why would that happen if it's COVID, Why would that happen in the third and fourth quarter instead of in twenty twenty. But he said, I know it's COVID, and I know that you can't die if you've got the vaccine. Therefore, this is COVID deaths, and this is from unvaccinated people, and we want to raise the insurance rates of unvaccinated people. This is how

people can ignore the obvious evidence there. But yeah, one of the top four leading causes, perhaps even higher than that, abortion is conducted by Planned Parenthood and the leading cause of death in the US, with the organization recommending pregnant clients aboard ninety seven percent of the time. Well, that surprises me. I would have thought it would have been one hundred percent. What happened

to those other three percent? They released their annual report showing how many abortions that they had done, and Marjorie dannen Felzer, who is with the Susan B. Anthony Pro Life America group, said that they were given seven hundred million dollars in taxpayer fundes. Wow, so I guess you know, if you're looking at this is almost like two thousand dollars perter, isn't it. This amount made up a third of the organization's revenue, with Plan Parenthood ending

the fiscal year with two point five billion dollars in net assets. You want to know why why the Planned Parenthood and Wife Pfizer is killing people because the government pays them to the government pays really well. Kill people with a shot, kill people with the hospital death protocols that Trump gave them, kill people

with abortion, and I'll pay you billions of dollars to do that. Representative Smith, a co chair of the House Pro Life Caucus, said the federal taxpayer funds should not be funneled to big abortion corporations like Planned Parenthood, which has killed over nine point three million children since nineteen seventy and actually that number is about six times higher. I don't know where he got that. I've never seen that. I've seen over sixty million abortions since rov Wade, and

he's even going back to nineteen seventy. So I don't know where he got that number, but I think it's extremely lightweight. So we've got a Christian woman. You talk about commitment and integrity. This is a Christian woman who survived a Communist concentration camp, but she's prepared to die in US prison over the Biden administration so called Department of Justice coming after her for Face Act charges.

A Christian woman who survived a Communist concentration campan Eastern Europe recently explained how she's making preparations to die in an American prison after being charged by the US so called Department of Justice. The contempt that I have for this federal government, Republican and Democrat, it is nothing but a massive instrument of death,

destruction, war, enslavement. I despise the American government. Ava Adel, eighty eight years old, among eleven protesters of the Biden Department of Justice slapped her charges for allegedly violating the freedom of access to clinic entrances the Face Act in October twenty twenty two. The Department of Justice accused them of intimidating and interfering with employees of the clinic and a patient who was seeking reproductive health services

at the clinic. A federal judge found her, in four others guilty earlier this month, and she awaits sentencing on July thirtieth. Our government sides with planned parenthood. Our government sides with the killers. Oh pity them. They're being bullied, and we don't want anybody there who's going to defend against a

killer who comes into a classroom. And we don't want anybody at the mass murder sites we call planned parenthood trying to defend and to educate people so they don't kill a child and so they don't have regret about that the rest of their life. Adel also faces charges stemming from an August twenty to twenty protest an abortion clinic in Michigan and an April twenty twenty one protest at a clinic

and Saginaw, Michigan. Collectively, she faces eleven years in prison and three hundred and fifty thousand dollars in fine from our government that funds one war after the other. Isn't that amazing? The Biden administration was so much blood on their hands. They kill people abroad They kill people with their vaccines and their mandates and their hospitals. They kill people by funding abortion, and they come after the people who try to defend innocent life. It just boggles the mind.

How much wrath is being stored up against these people for eternal wrath. This amazes me, she told The Daily Signal. She already has resigned to the possibility she'll be imprisoned until the end of her life or her protests. During what she and others attempted to dissuade women from going through with their planned abortion, she said, when I was indicted, I began to prepare to die there. Right now, I'm ambivalent. I'm doing the best I can

to get ready. I haven't talked to a funeral director yet. I'm just being sensible. There's no guarantee that I'll survive. She further warned that the US government is increasingly resembling the communist regime her family escaped. Oh yeah, these people are full on communists. Just look at shi Van Fleet. You know it is Mao's America. She said. What they're doing with this woke

stuff, that's a struggle session. We've seen all that. I lived all of that in China and now here it is in America, and you think that this is something new. Why do you think it's new. First of all, because you were ignorant. They've kept us ignorant of history, and they've changed the terms, and now we're the reds. Right. All of this stuff is just designed to keep us ignorant, enterpressed. She said,

the US government is increasingly resembling the communist regime. Or family escaped, recalling to the outlet house, she was only nine years old and she and her family were taken in cattle cars to the Gokova concentration camp and what was then Yugoslavia. Her family were Danube Swabians, a German speaking ethnic group in Yugoslavia that was targeted for extermination in the wake of World War Two by Joseph Brose, the country's communist president. Now this is after you know, everybody thinks,

so concentration camps, that's only Hitler in the Nazis. No, No, the Communists killed more people than the Nazis did. Frankly, we were packed body to body and being a small child, I could hardly breathe. We had no food, no water. She added that her mother found it inconceivable that the government would persecute them until it happened, which she suggested should be a cautionary tale for Americans today. We always underestimate the evil, don't

we. We underestimate the evil that men are capable of the people. It's just like talked about Ted Bundy earlier. It's such a nice looking boy, you know, he was so attractive and friendly and charming and all the rest of this stuff. Nobody can imagine except for these psychopaths like Ted Bundy or you know, Biden or Trump. Nobody can engine that they're capable of these

mass murder programs. And that's how they get away with it. And they also we underestimate their technology if you're talking about the government, so, she said. She was rescued from Kakova, escaped to Austria, ultimately wound up in the US, where she became involved in the pro life movement after learning

about what she described as America's death camps planned parenthood. Isn't it interesting when we talk about the massive causes of death and everything when you look at it, you know, Fauci and Trump and Biden and their vaccines and their hospital death protocols and remdzevir and all the rest of this stuff. And yet you know, Fauci is right there at the nexus of this other mass murder of

abortions and things. Because as we found when they decided that they were going to shoot the messenger David de Leiden, who discovered how a planned parenthood was doing murder for yeah, we need we need organs from a baby that is you know, this level of maturity and everything. So they would go out

and procure that. And who were they procuring it for, well after La La Harris, who was the state district attorney at the time, and then Javier Sarah who replaced her when she became senator and now she's vice president. Javier Visara is head of HHS, which is above NIH and Fauci's an i ai D. But it was the NIH and Fauci's n i ai D that was a major customer of this murder for higher scheme, using it to create

transhumanized mice to supposedly test their drugs on. Talk about the ethics the YA pharmacy, the pharmaceutical companies, and talk about the ethics of these lack of ethics of these people. Fauci is right these mass murders, they just all converged. It's like these mcguffins, like the climate mcguffin, the COVID mcguffin, all the rest of the stuff. They have the same players, the same goals at the end, they just different ways of getting there. So

she described it as America's death camps. She has been arrested forty six times since nineteen eighty for her protest at abortion clinics. She said it never involved any violence. She recalled that she was even arrested on the order of former Senator Ted Kennedy. Yeah RFK juniors uncle there when she went to his office in nineteen nineties to complain about his support for the Face Act, the repeal of which some Republicans have lately been calling for mid the increased number of pro

life activists who were being charged under it during the Biden presidency. So I guess she had the You get arrested for going face to face with murderers,

including people like Ted Kennedy. Edel's Adol's vivid memories of being rounded up and hauled off to Kakova for extermination have animated her protests and stealed her against arrest She likened the situation to her fellow Yugoslavians, who allowed their fear to prevent them from doing all they could to stand in the way of a wicked government perpetrating evil. She said, what if citizens of my country would have overcome their fear, and what if a number of them stood on those railroad tracks

between the gate of the entrance to the death camp and the train? The train would have to stop, and while the guards on those trains would be busy rounding up the ones who were in front of the train, another group could have come in pride, open our cattle car and possibly set us free. But nobody did anything. She noted that some people openly wept as the cattle car is carrying the victims rumbled along the train tracks toward the death camp,

but their tears proved ultimately useless because nobody took a stand. Many people have talked about that in terms of the Germans rounding up people, and you know when they finally somebody finally did take a stand in the Warsaw ghetto and took out one of the Nazis and took their gun, and then used that

gun to take another Nazis gun. That turned into a very very long standoff that you know, again is when I was talking about April nineteenth, a day that we have seen tyranny sometimes get away with it, but sometimes not get away with it, you know. Trying to take the guns at conquered in Lexington, they didn't get away with it, but most of the time

they do. When you look at the Branch Davidians, and how after being held off for quite some time, just like the Jews at the Warsaw Ghetto held off the Nazis for quite some time, they got tired of it. They burned down the city, just like they burned down on April nineteenth, The same day the FBI burned down the Branch Davidians of killing men, women and children. That's what they did in Warsaw as well. Better to die

on your feet, isn't it? So? She said, When we place our bodies between the women and the clinic, we buy time to get our sidewalk counselors the opportunity to speak with women and hopefully open their hearts with love for their babies and let their babies live. She said. Regarding the goals, what are they trying to accomplish? Trying to buy some time trying to persuade people. I feel very strongly, she said, because of my background,

the human life is sacred. Government does not have the authority to permit what God forbids, and this murder is forbidden by God. So then that brings us to the opposite side, somebody like Carrie Lake, who's just now flipped again. She's now supporting the Civil War era abortion law. Isn't it interesting? You know when we talk about Civil War, and as I've said, it's got a lot more. You know, certainly slavery was a part of it, but it was about much more than that. It was about

a fourth turning. It was about industrialization, the creation of the nation state. We saw it happening, the same things happening in Italy and other places at the same time. But the slavery aspect of it, in personhood aspect of it, was a very important thing. That is the argument here in terms of abortion personhood. I think it's appropriate that it would be a Civil War era law that would stop these abortions. But now Carrie Lake was for

it again. Now she's for life again. She is a pathetic diletent, a narcissistic celebrity who is self serving, just like Trump. I am sick to death of people who have absolutely no principles. They will stab us in the back or stab us in the arm. They'll commit mass murder, and we'll let them get away with it because we are so enthralled with celebrities. She is the antithesis of this eighty eight year old woman who is more than

willing to lay her life on the line. This person has absolutely no principles. Get her off of the stage because it is nothing but a stage for people like her. If you like the Eagles on the cars and Huey Lewis and the news, they say, then you'll love the classic hits channel at APS Radio, download our app, or listen now at apsradio dot com. The common Man they created common core, dumbed down our. They create a common past, track and control us their commons project to make sure the commoners

own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us. While they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.

Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Night Show dot com. Well, I want to thank on rock fan Greg Talent, thank you very much for the tip. And also on rock fan Brandon Bennett, thank you very much. I also want to thank I've been trying to do this for two days and I've got the entire month here of people who have made donations on zel

that I have not read their names. It's getting quite long. Please bear with me. I want to at least acknowledge and thank them for what they

have contributed. Linda M, susan El, Gretchen C, Michael L, William D, Rogelio, Jay, Aaron G. Kimberly M, Maurice W, Susan L. Felicia H. Matthew M, David M. Manny D, Sylvia D, Peter E, Adam D, Sean S, Jeffrey C. William R. And Gregory I. Gretchen C again, Michael P. Jeffrey C again, Michael L. William R, Alex C, J H, Marcos V Felicia H, Benjamin R. Lisa Kay j H, Kevin M, Mara G. James O, Jared You, Kenneth C. Mitchell, M. Kimberly M. Thank you so much, and so many people.

Many of them have contributed a lot. Many of them contribute on a regular basis. As a matter of fact, the names when I start to type their names, they pop up in the spreadsheet because they are there so many times. And so I really do thank you for your faithful support. And it is I've not updated the gas gage from the last couple of days, but it is. It is very low this month. So we really do appreciate the support, especially this month. Getting back to the news,

so much violence that is really heading internal. You know, we've had we've had peace at home since the Civil War, haven't we? Even though we've been involved in a lot of foreign wars, we've had peace at home. I don't know how much longer that's going to go on. When you look at what is happening in various places. Haiti is perhaps one of the worst examples. Haiti, and then the NARCO states that we've helped to create with

our war on drugs. As a matter of fact, we're going to have Marty Gottisfeld joining us in the third hour talking about something that an issue now for the DEA in terms of this war on drugs. But when you look at what is going on in Haiti, it's not really the drug war that's happening there. But nevertheless Biden has gotten us involved in it. And of course there's the migrant issue. Is this going to spill over into this country? Just as we have to be concerned about what is going on with the

drug cartels in Mexico, Central and South America. You know people coming and can go down to Central America, South America, the drug lords there, they're coming in this way. You look at MS thirteen that's out of El Salvador. But it really got its start here in America with the drug people in La So and then that was their base and Haiti, the Haitian gang leader Barbecue, so they refer to this guy. I reportedly ordered his men to burn every house you find. I wonder if that's why they call him

Barbecue. I don't know where he got his nickname. The cannibal arsonist I don't know, as a wave of vicious gang attacks swept across porter Prints, apparently in a bid to intimidate the recently announced Transitional Council from meeting in order to appoint a new government. Reporters described part of porter Prints as a battlefield between police and armed gangs. On Sunday, I said dozens of homes and

businesses were set ablaze, violence spilled in the suburbs. Gang members rensacked the medical center at the State University of Haiti, one of the country's most prestigious schools. So two audio messages proportedly from barbecue, where he said, continue burning the houses. Make everybody leave. No need to know which house burn every house you find set the fire, the messages said. And so he also said that he would provide the gasoline to fuel the arson spree, just

as we provide the money to fuel the wars abroad. The un reported on Friday that violence and Haiti intensified by more than fifty percent first quarter this year, with more organized gang attacks on government and law enforcement facilities such as the prisons emptied by gang attacks attacking prisons, letting everybody loose more chaos. At least twenty two police facilities were looted and set fire by the end of March,

and nineteen police officers were killed. The UN said that Haiti's gangs are committing almost every human rights violation in the books, from using rape as a weapon to recruiting child soldiers. Kidnapping for ransom declined slightly, although it is still a common crime, as the gangs shifted their focus from creating as much mayhem and carnage as possible. There are vigilante killings by angry and desperate civilians

on the rise. The AP interviewed a group of Porta Prince residents on Saturday Sunday who were trying to scrounge up enough money to build a metal barricade around their community to keep out both hoodlums and marauding vigilante gangs. That's why I say, you know, we need to think about the possibility anything like that happening here. The demographics of our country are being deliberately rapidly changed, rapidly changed, and we don't know what's going to really happen in terms of hardship

in the future. That's why you know, I will recommend again because I think it's a very important thing for people. The Civil Defense Manual put out by Jacklaws and Civil Defensemanual dot Com. Start to know your neighbors because one of the things they're saying about this is people just using this as an opportunity to make recriminations against people, or just an opportunity to go in and loot and rob. So many different motives that are there. You're not going to

want to do this on your own. There's a lot of very helpful device advice there at Civil Defense Manual dot Com what to do for yourself in terms of food and water, to prepare for a variety of things natural disasters as well as I would say government made disasters like this or civil war. Gang violence spiked after the gangs were able to prevent Prime Minister Ariel Henry from returning to the country after a trip to Kenya at the end of February. Henry

had taken power after the assassination of the previous president. He has never stood for election, and so he agreed to resign, but he's not resigned. So the gangs ostensibly united in a rebel coalition to force him out of office, but then they kind of liked doing that gang thing. They enjoyed the violence, They enjoyed the power and the destruction, and so they become more violent and instructive. Even after he seemingly surrendered and agreed to resign, even

though he hasn't done it. After months of intensive negotiation and tear on the streets, the membership of the Transitional Council was finally announced in April the sixteenth. It includes seven voting members and two non voting observers, and the un loved it, and Biden showered them with sixty million dollars. Not a penny, by the way, for our border, right, not a penny. But here, let's let's give the you know, the corrupt government and the

gangs. Let's drop sixty million dollars just you know, loaded up helicopter over and just push it out the doors. I guess right, No, that

would be uh, that'd be too egalitarian. They have to make sure they hand it to the right politicians, you know, just like Zelenski stealing four hundred million dollars, just amazing the villas that he's got, the Parisian shopping trips of missus Zelenski and all the rest of this time so disgusted with this government we have anyway, so skeptical observers, even some members of the Council themselves, think that Henry will undermine the transition process so he can stay in

power, or that the gangs will use tror tactics to prevent the Council from even meeting. So could this type of thing happen here? Well, again, our demographics are rapidly changing, and then within each of our big cities we have the Democrats have come up with a way to create anarchy and to further fuel gangs. When you look at what is driving most of these these

really powerful gangs internationally, it's been our war on drugs. You know, just in the same way that al Capone rose to power and many others like him during alcohol prohibition that only lasted about a decade. We've had this thing going now for you know, fifty plus years, the War on drugs probably

getting up to you know, fifty five or something like that. But you know, this has been going on five times as long, and so we have fueled very very powerful organized crime organizations within the United States as well as in other countries. But then there's the other aspect of it. And that is these powerful gangs that are being created by Democrat policies, by these Soros district attorneys. And he's Democrat politicians in the big cities. And so Michael

Snyder end of the American Dream Blog. He asked which major city will completely collapse first? Los Angeles, Chicago or New York City? Which one you know we want to place your bets. Which one do you put your money on? It's going to have a full blown collapse. And he's got a video. I won't show you this video. John Williams Report took his camera with him as he walked through downtown LA describe what he witnessed as hell.

Decades of failed policies have transformed one of the greatest cities in the entire country into one of the worst. I'm not so sure these policies have failed, just like I don't think the schools have failed. I think the schools are doing precisely what they want the schools to do. It's by design. At this point, theft has become so rampant, and this is my design that even ultra progressive politicians in California have come to the conclusion that something must be

done. So several bills that would crack down on shoplifting have been introduced in the state legislature. You see, you give them something like, well, we're going to prohibit alcohol, we're going to prohibit drugs of some sort or whatever, and then they make those drugs more intense. They start fighting. The way these gangs compete with each other, it is not by offering a better product or service. They compete by killing each other and anybody else that

gets in the way. And it may start with a monopoly on a particular drug or drugs. It may start with the fact that they now have a profit center where they can go in a shoplift. But it doesn't stop there. They branch out into other criminal activity and it continually gets more and more dangerous. It continually escalates off of these deliberate policies. And so you've got

now several bills that will crack down on shoplifting. California legislatures introduced a comprehensive package of seven bills aim to address the rising concern of a retail theft across the state. Well, it's a daylight a dollar short, and it's not

going to work. And I'll tell you why. Even if they get these things passed, and again they're going to now criminalize shoplifting again because right now you can go in and every trip you take to a store, the way Michael reports it here, you go to retail store every single day of the year and steal nine hundred and forty nine dollars worth of merchandise. And that's not a crime, not a crime. But that's not every single day,

that's every single trip that you make to that store. Even you can go get nine hundred and forty nine dollars and you know, go hand it off to somebody else, and then you can come back and get another nine hundred and forty nine dollars. As long as you don't do more than nine hundred and forty nine dollars each trip, it's all free. And so we're walking

up laundry, detergent and things like that in those places. But here's why it won't matter now at this point to make it a crime to buy this stuff in order to resell it, that's what they're saying, because it still has to be you still have to have the district attorney actually prosecute these guys. It say. It's just like a lot of these places said well, we're going to defund the police. Aren't going to get rid of police. Now the crime shoots up. Or you say we're going to legalize shoplifting,

crime explodes. The problem is, though, is that even if you get more police, and even if they focused on this rather than writing policy tickets, you know, parking tickets, even if they focused on the actual crime, these district attorneys are just going to let people go. And so the

real issue is even if the state comes back and says that's it. You know, we've got these isolated towns where they're just doing this, but that's that kind of those criminal gangs are spilling over into our town now and we had enough. And these are Democrats who are introducing this bill because it's basically all left in the government in California. The bill says serial retail thieves would get up to three years behind bars for possessions stolen property with an intent to

resell. The flaw in all of this is that you have to have these the district attorney has to prosecute them. You see the genius of why Soros did this. You see why Soros focused on local things. Elon Musk understand that I understand it. I hope you understand it. The vast majority of

Americans don't understand that it's not Trump and Biden at the top. Yes, they should be we should roll back these usurpations that they gave money for and orders for, and all the rest of that stuff, and they need to be held responsible for it, and they need to go to jail for this as an example to stop this from happening with other people. Instead we reward them. That's what I have a problem with. But you have to understand

that the real issue is what is happening there locally. That's why Sorrow's put in those district attorneys. And even if you make it a felony, and even if you've got police, and even if they arrest these people, Sorrows can block it with a district attorney. You say, nullification can operate in a lot of different ways, and we have to be wise in terms of where we apply our energy, our efforts, our money, and we have

to focus on local because that's where it all happens. They're not even going to be able to pull this back at the state level, even though they know it. Even though it's Democrats who want to pull it back because this is billing into their community. It's at the local level. That's what I want to hammer into everybody's heads. Everybody is so focused on this celebrity reality TV show between Biden and Trump and the show trial. I mean, it's

such a soap opera. Is he falling asleep? Is Melania there? What's it? You know, I just discuss me. It disgusts me. Is like the OJ Simpson trial. It really is. And I didn't follow that. I didn't hang on every aspect of that at the time. But you know, all of the ink that is, so to speak, it's not ink anymore, I guess. But all the time and the words and the effort focusing on all these trials and this back and forth stuff. Yes it's corrupt, but look at all the other things that are corrupt. Look at

all the other things that directly affected us that are corrupt. You're worried about, you know, his marl Ago being searched. What about the SWAT teams, the unannounced no knock raids that kill people? What about the civil asset forfeiture that is stealing stuff from people all the time. You're upset about them

taking his some of his billions of dollars worth of property. Well yeah, but look what about the poor people who are getting their cars confiscating, their homes confiscated, and the civil asset forfeiture and all the rest of stuff. Well, that's stop with a drug war. These are people who didn't have

anything to do with any of that. One of the first cases I saw this was a guy who had a private jet service and he took a couple of guys with that were in suits and had briefcases, and he flew them from the US to Canada for a business meeting he thought, and then returned to When they returned, the DEA surrounds his plane, arrest these guys and then said well, we're taking your plane. Now what I didn't anything to

do with it. We know you didn't have anything to do with it, but we're going to see your plane because it was an accessory to the crime. And they charged the plane with a crime, never even charged him with a crime, never gave him a trial. So cry your tears about Trump. I've heard this stuff for thirty five years. I don't care because Trump didn't care when he was president to stop this for other people. It'll be a different situation. But instead, what he's done is he's played with this

corrupt government. He's played with the CIA and these other intelligence agencies. He's allowed all of this stuff to continue. He allowed the censorship, he allowed the confiscation, the removal of due process. Well, guess what now you're suffering the consequences if he had taken a principal stand against some of this stuff. But he didn't even remotely do that. So Michael Snyder says, which of these cities then will completely collapse first? And so he gives he talks

about the current statement there. He actually doesn't give an answer as to which one of them he thinks is going to collapse first. I don't know where where Larry Fink, the CEO of black Rock, I don't know where his house is, but he's definitely worried about this stuff. I don't know how

much his house costs either. They don't mention it in the article, but you know Blackrock that has ten and a half trillion dollars and has pushed ESG to try to destroy everybody, just like we see happening in these other cities. He's now spend five hundred and sixty three thousand dollars to upgrade his home security system. That's not the title cost of his home security. That's just an upgrade. His upgrade is more than most people's homes are. And who

knows how much the entire security system is. What is he afraid of, Well, he says he's afraid of anti woke activists. He's afraid of people like me. He says, anti woke active and conspiracy theorists will that'd be me. I'm not coming after you, Larry. Yeah, what you need to be afraid of is the total societal collapse that you're pushing. You're pushing societal collapse. That's what he knows. He knows that he's pushing our society

to collapse. And so he's circling the wagons. It's some security half a million dollars, more than half a million dollars to upgrade his home security. And this, I think is as every day that goes by and we look at what happened with Speaker Johnson and these votes for war and everything, every

day that goes by, you see a new betrayal. You know, we saw that betrayal and then we realize, oh, he manipulated the voting process, they had a majority of people who wanted to do something about the border of whatever it was. I mean, you know, we're not even at the point where we would discuss what should be done. This is if any thing should be done, if anything should be done, not even talking about the effectiveness of anything, but just we don't even care. Just leave it

alone. And so he played the games, the procedural games, to make sure that even though a majority of people voted to do something something about the border, that it didn't pass. Now we find out that buried in the bill for Israel is three point five billion dollars to support migrants and refugees. Not only did they do not do anything about the border, but they slipped stuff in here to support illegal immigration. Three and a half billion dollars.

Well, you talk about a betrayal. This is why not even a penny in an election year, in the issue that matters most, the domestic issue that matters most to his constituency, he doesn't spend a time, but instead three and a half billion dollars to facilitate this migration and refugee assistance. The funds will be used to pay NGOs coordinating the illegal invasion at our southern border, suggest one user on X and probably right, and to provide them freebies

once they're in. It's these NGOs and they channel the money through the UN. It gives it to these non governmental organizations that then inject people into the appropriate places. Michael Jahn has talked about this. I had him on once and talked about the Darien gap and how you know they these non governmental organizations

that are funded by the UN, which is funded by America. You know, they launder this money in a sense, they know which country they can put these people in, and they then escort them and help them along the way, give them money and all the rest of the stuff. Then when they get here they get more money. Three and a half billion dollars from the betrayal of Speaker Johnson and again buried in the Israel Israel Aid bill,

which brings up a question why do they put it in that? Is it because they want to bring in Palestinians and you know, get the people out of the way for the Israeli government out of Gaza and bring their problem here. Is that what they're doing three and a half billion dollars for the Department of State migration and refugee assistance. Nowhere in the build does it say which migrants, or from where they'll be coming from, or how the funds will

be used to assist them. It's a slush fund. Given that it's part of the Israel package, one might assume that it's referring to refugees from Gaza. However, that isn't articulated in the text, So we can assume that the funds can apply to whatever the State Department wants, assuming Congress and the President activate that. Yeah, don't say Israel never gave us anything. They're going to give us their problems, their problem people. They'll send them to

us so Jared Kushner can do his his ocean front property stuff there. Congress has provided a virtual slush fund for yet another category of people who are not Americans and has failed to pass legislation. They will protect the country from the economic and national security risks posed by unchecked illegal immigration. So when you look at this, I want to go to the alternative right media aggregators and stuff. So several of them saying, oh, look at this, Alex Jones

lays out Cloud and Piven. Is that news news to these people or Are they just trying to curry favor with Alex? You know, yeah, Cloward and Piven is what it's been. And we've said this for the longest time. I saw a couple of months ago Glenn Beck talking about that. I thought, that's no, he wants to and everybody was like, oh, oh, oh, this is news. It's like, no, it's not.

Glenn Beck is always way. You know, when you had the Fusion centers after two thousand and eight elections, when they said anybody has a bumper sticker that says Ron Paul or Chuck Baldwin, Oh, they're probably a sovereign citizen terrast, so you be ready to shoot to kill tell them to police that anyway, we got that from the Fusion Center. I remember Glenn Beck probably about five or six years ago, about fifteen years after the fact,

saying fusion center. What's that? You know, somebody mentioned that and they look up Wikipedia Live and start reading the definition on the air of what a fusion center is. It's like, are you that uninformed? And so, you know, he discovered Clowyard didn't pivot. I thought, this is another one of these deals. But then Alex brings it up. Oh, we're Cloward and Piven of course is Cloyd and Piven, you know, talked about

that along two economists working for the Democrats. He said, we need to reset the economy, take it down, make everybody poor and dependent on us. That's what they want. All of this war on poverty is actually a war of poverty. They want people to be impoverished and dependent upon them, just like the war on drugs is a war of drugs. It's a CIA running drugs to harm the community and to just create chaos so they can rule. So the war of drugs, the war of poverty created to do that.

And yet they said, our welfare state, our great society, is not being adapted a sufficient amount to really do what we want to do. So let's bring in people from other countries and put them on the welfare state and that'll help us to collapse things quickly. That's what they're doing right now. Chip Roy of Texas, speaking yesterday, said that Mike Johnson walked away from his promise to secure the border as part of the foreign aid package.

Yeah, we notice that the clips of that over and over again. I think the American people now see very clearly what's going on. Let's be very clear. A majority of Republicans voted against this bill on Saturday. It's not some band of crazy people. Majority Republicans voted no. The American people are now seeing laid bare that the Republican Party campaigned using big rhetoric. The speaker spent six months saying, Hey, I'm going to secure the border. And

it's more than that. I mean, it is every Republican presidential congressional candidate going back for a couple of decades. Oh, yeahctually even longer than that, you know, going back to Reagan. They came up with an amnesty bill forty years ago. Yeah, we're going to fix it once and for all. We're going to give him money and amnesty. That'll stop it. Oh, you reward that behavior, You're going to get more of it anyway.

He says, Hey, I'm going to secure the border. For six months, he says, I'll demand it on the back of Ukraine, and then walks away from that promise. Chip Roy says, my heart goes out to the people of Ukraine. I stand in solidarity with the people of Israel, but I'm not going to fund both sides of a war. I'm not going to spend one hundred billion dollars we don't have unpaid for to then walk away from securing the border of the United States. And that is what the

speaker did, and yet he was fully supported by Trump. And all this was and is so when we're talking about violence, and we're talking about the open borders and all the rest of this, the polarization, the insane polarization. I mean, there is a real it's not this election's presidential election is not just about distracting you from existential issues. It's also about creating two war and camps. And Jim Quinn understands that, he understands that we're in time

a fourth turning, coming in to the end of it. And so he was interested to go see the Civil War film that just went to the cinemas. And he begins when he talks about the film, it begins by talking about his experience. I just don't go to the movies anymore. I've only seen a handful of movies in the last decade. I've seen less than that. I think. I just they've gotten really really bad, really really expensive. But he gives this assessment. He says Regal cinemas where he lived was

a place to go. In the old days, it had twenty four theaters. It was always packed. You can never get a parking spot close to the venue. The restaurant near the theater always had a line. You usually had to wait thirty minutes to get a seat. And so he said, we decided to go and see Civil War on Friday night. And boy, times have changed. Regal cinemas went bankrupt a few years ago after COVID, well after. I think more specifically, we need to say Trump's civil war.

It was a civil war against So it was a domestic war against us. And you call it a revolutionary war and call it a civil war, I don't know, but it really was a civil war. And I think probably civil war makes more of a sense because it was about, you know, from the perspective of let's say Stonewall Jackson. He looked at it as a second war of independence. They were not interested in taking over the entire country. They had no interest in ruling New York, for example. They

didn't want to take over Washington and be the government. And that's really what you're talking about with the Civil War. That's why I say this description of what Trump did was really more like a civil war. We're going to completely throw out the old rules, the old constitution and do all of this stuff. No, I mean they just wanted to just leave us alone. We're going to succeed that type of thing. And you know, when you look at the movies, I guess you know, real life is a little bit

too interesting right now. As they say the Chinese curse made you live in interesting times. We're living in really interesting times that are very very dangerous. And the movies are even more stupid and even more degenerate than the reality that we're living in. And that's enough for me, quite frankly, I don't need to see something as even more dangerous and degenerate and stupid and dumbed down than our current society anyway, he says. So things have really changed,

he said. The theater went out of business, went bankrupt, is taken over by some local businessmen. Now they play four or five movies. They only charged ten dollars a ticket, he said. Instead of hundreds of cars in the parking lot, there were about thirty cars. We expected a long wait time at the restaurant, but there was dozens of seats everywhere. He said. When we went over to the cinema. There was nobody even checking to see if we had tickets. It was like a ghost. A Friday

night at the movies a decade ago was a big deal. The place would have been bustling. I can't see this place making it over long haul, he said. There were only eight people there to see Civil War. He said the previews were so loud we thought we're going to have to need ear plugs, but the sound became more reasonable once the movie started. My interest in this movie, he says, stems from the snippet shown in the previews where a guy holding some journalists at gunpoint ask them who they are. They

respond, Americans, and he asked them what kind of Americans? He said, I think that was a profound question, as this country has already been split into two enemy camps, with a leftist already fighting the war by any means necessary. Laws and morality no longer matter during this time of coming conflict. We know that we're in the back end of the fourth turning. There's a high likelihood of civil and or global war in the next few years.

Whenever I point this out, many scorn the possibility of a civil war. Think keyboard warriors will never have the guts to get into a shooting war with a government and or leftist fanatics, he said. I was hoping the movie would provide some thought provoking fodder, but it was more about the journalist characters traveling from New York City to Washington, d C. In order to get

an interview with the embattled president. You see, the journalists just don't understand what's going on, even in this movie where they make the journalist the heroes. It truly is amazing because and I've seen this in other reviews, I said, oh, yeah, you know, it just shows you how important journalism is. Well from his perspective, he rigs it that way. Look,

you look at what is happening in Colombia today. You know, the anarchy, the riots coming after people who are Jewish or who look Jewish or whatever, and how they're having to shut this thing down. I don't know much about Columbia. My really only thing I've ever paid any attention to Columbia about was when I was in college. I saw a debate that was on public TV and it was hosted by the Columbia School of Journalism, and it

absolutely disgusted me. Both Columbia and journalism, and so they had very well known journalists on one side. They had very well known government officials and ex government officials on the other side. And at one point, the thing that really just knocked me out of my chair was a question was put up by the moderator, who was a big hancho there at the Columbia School of Journalism, that we're supposed to be impressed and supposed to be one of the best

schools of journalism or something like that. And I had no aspirations to be a journalist at the time or ever, and I don't want to be one now. Frankly, I don't see what I do as journalism. But they asked him a question and got the responses of both sides, and so they asked these big name journalists, so you are embedded, because this is an you know, right after the Vietnam War, you're embedded with the vietcom and you're doing a report on them, and now all of a sudden, they're

an ambush and an American patrol is coming. What do you do? Do you warn the Americans? And to a man, they said, no, I'm just I'm a neutral observer. I don't have any sides and all this times. And you know, I was all prepared to go against the government guys because I didn't like the guys that were there. You know, I didn't like the kind of polity. But they were rightfully and righteously flabbergasted at these people for such cowardice and betrayal in a sense, I think, and

you know, they're just gonna sit there and let these guys die. And yeah, but the journalists were absolutely unrepentant. Even when they were called, they didn't even blink twice. No, no, I don't care, not my not my thing. I say, I'm not interested in being a journalist. About the only time I've I've had some trips where I've done journalism and everything, but you know, I guess the first one I did was going to the Bundy Ranch. I didn't go there as a journalist to find out

about Agenda twenty one. I didn't go there to get on TV. I didn't go there to get my name out. I went there because I wanted to stop a massacre like Waco or Ruby Ridge that I saw developing there. I wanted to shine the camera on what they were doing there. And it makes me absolutely disgusted when I look at what journalism has become. It's all about me too, you know, let me get my face on the camera. Am I ready for my close up? The satellite pictures of what it's

his name now, Dan? Rather? Yeah, I think about him fore wis it's been gone for a while just before. I think it was the first golf war. And you know, it used to be when we had these analog satellites that if you had a feed for I had a friend who did that, you would see what they were doing in between shots. You know, they never went off the air and you could tap into that.

And so he's looking out he's in a military vehicle. He's looking out across the horizon like he's really in deep thought about this war that's about to happen. And he turns around to the to the guy behind him, he says, how's my hair? It was like, yeah, with me? Is my hair still here? Of a munch of it fell out today? I don't know, But the uh, it is so shallow. It's so shallow. It's all about him. And you got a massive you're on the cus pair of a war. He's there to cover it and it's all about him.

Journalism disgusted me, Columbia University discussed me, and so yeah, the anyway, getting back to this movie, he says, uh, for most of the movie, you can't tell who's fighting who. That seems realist stick for a civil war scenario, he said. The scene where the journalists are asked what kind of American are you? Captures how confusing and chaotic it will be if we have this. I don't think the guy dressed in military garbage

on either side they were dumping bodies into a hole. Without anyone to enforce laws, warlords will rise up and execute retribution on locals that they consider to be enemies. This is what we see happening right now in Haiti. Every local community will become a battleground. Neighbors versus neighbors, family versus families. With three hundred million guns, there will be bloodshed. Look, this is why, again just mentioned again, you need to get Civil defensemanual dot com.

Take a look at that. There's a lot of wisdom there. He's not just what he has to say. He's got other people who are experts at various things as well. Two characters let be known that their parents have stayed on their farms in Missouri and Columbia, pretending there is no civil war. They seem dismayed that they wouldn't choose sides. That made me wonder whether those who choose to not participate in the coming civil war will be able to

work their farms in peace. Well, you might want to look at the last civil war. Just had somebody ask me, you know, what is that movie that you play, Shenandoah. And it's like, well, it's Shenandoah, like the song, you know. And the guy back to me and he said, just saw that. He says, what a good film that was. He said, they just so I hate to say that they don't make them like that anymore younger than I am, But yeah, they

don't. They really don't. But in that film, you see that Jimmy Start plays this really grough guy who does not want to get involved in the civil war. You may not be interested in the civil war, but civil war is going to be interested in you, just like our government. You may not be interested in politics, but our government and our politics is interested

in you. And you better understand what they're interested in doing to you, so you can try to do something to protect yourself about it locally, locally, not in Washington. That's gone, folks. Washington is gone a long time ago. Since modern society will come to a grinding halt with shortages of

food and fuel. I'm afraid small farmers will come under attack by the hungry masses, and it'll be essential for small communities of like minded folk to form militias to protect their farms and communities civil defensemanual dot com talk about give you some strategies about how you might do that. We all know that our existing uniparty government, he says. This is another bullet point from it, the uniparty government, the unicrane government. If we will, we know it's corrupt,

we know it's evil, we know it hates us. Whether we call it the deep state, a corrupt oligarchy, or a corporate fascist, detlitarian state, it is clear that they are our enemy. This movie did not take signs, but it did imply that the existing government will be defeated. The question is who or what takes their place. Sadly, it is unlikely that a republic will be reborn from the ashes of an empire of debt,

delusion, decay. Let's do another d debauchery, degeneracy. Yeah. See, the problem is the American character that was existent in the people of seventeen seventy six is long gone. We may have been born in the same country they were born in, but not in the same culture. We are not Americans in the sense of seventeen seventy six. They had a character. They were focused and raised the values of Christianity, whether or not they embraced it.

Thomas Jefferson a good example. Even though he went in and with his scissors and cut out the things that he didn't like out of the Bible, he had him embraced the fundamentals of a Christianity and his outlook toward society. Civil War was a sobering and depressing movie. I think it is a foreshadowing of what lies ahead. Well, yeah, so, I guess I don't need to pay to see because I've already seen what lies ahead, haven't you. Yeah. It's not that hard to see, is it. They've had

a front row seat to this for quite some time. The real issue is we've got to make America godly again, and that's something we do, just like working at the local level. That's local as well. That's a one on one type of thing. Start with yourself, then go to your family, your community, your neighbors. That type of thing got to make America godly again because what the Founders understood in seventeen seventy six, in Benjamin Franklin

said, liberty is a blessing from God. You know, all these people say, oh, well, you know they're in this this club or that club, or there were Masons or this or that, and Deists and all the rest of stuff. They understood more than a lot of people who identify themselves as evangelicals today. They understood that what had happened to them was a blessing from God, and we need to understand that is what is happening to this country today is a curse from God. You know a lot of people.

Somebody, some leftist preacher somewhere said the same thing about Biden that speaker Johnson said about himself and about all in this first meeting. He said, you got to understand God is the one who put us here. Well, that's true. That doesn't really tell you anything. You know. A leftist guy who supported Biden said the same thing, Well, God put Biden in office. That's true as well. Nothing happens that God does not allow or

plan. The question should be whether Johnson and his crew are going to be a blessing or curse to this country. And the question should be whether Biden is a blessing or a curse. I don't think that's a question anymore. I think that's no longer an open question. We have the answer to both of those, I think so. He says. When this happens, he says, it's going to be unclear who the good guys are and who the

bad guys are. He says, conflict is upon us. Well, I think you know when he starts to describe that, he says, have innocent people dying, says, the slaughter will be the norm. If there's a civil war, right boundaries between good and evil will blur. Right and wrong will become meaningless, and you won't know who the good guys and the bad guys are. I think he's describing our current society already. That's why. Yeah, he believes the civil war has already started in essence as part of

this fourth turning. And all these things, the lines of morality, the lines even of are we male or female? All these things, all of this reality has intentionally been blurred. But I don't think we necessarily are blind as to who the good guys the bad guys are. If we know what determines good and evil, God determines that. God lays that out, and so I don't think that we are without a compass in all of this. Just one more thing before we take a break here, and I thank you

on rock Fan Andromeda one. Thank you for the tip. I appreciate that David Mammutt basically been kicked out of Hollywood. This is a guy who was one of the best screenwriters in Hollywood. He did movies like Wag the Dog, absolute genius, House of Games, many many, many others that he's done a long list of things, and yet he's basically been per out of

Hollywood. He's he became more conservative in his political views. They kicked him out, But he was recently at the La Times Festival of Books because he wrote one. They won't let him do screenplays anymore, I guess, but he can still write a book. They can't stop that. He described the push for DEI, you know, the diversity, equity, inclusivity lie. He described that as garbage. He called it fascist tautolitarianism. He says,

it is fascist totlitarianism. Leave me alone, that's what I say. He said, I can't give you this stupid statue talking about the oscar unless you have seven percent of this and eight percent of that. That's just intrusive. That's the treason of the clerks. Say he's a good writer. Treason of

the clerks. That's what he should have called his book. It's the person who have the persons who have nothing to do with the with any of this except their scheme for power, and they are scheming for power, he said. When asked if there was any way to increase diversity across the show business, he said, well, that's not the job of the movies. The job of the movies is to entertain us. Is there to sell popcorn. If they think that there is an audience which is underserved, let them serve

it right. He says. It's a business like any other. They have a little business as a little business to improve everybody's racial understanding, as does the fire department. He said. Films hoping to win Best Picture have to hire more black, female, on LGBT or disabled cast and crew, or address themes that affect those communities. Those seeking Best Picture nominations have to meet two out of four requirements. See how bureaucratic this has begun here any of

the clerks. They include having at least one lead character in the movie be from an underrepresented racial or ethnic group. I don't know that you know LGBT is underrepresented anymore, certainly not women. I mean they're stars of every show. Now, every show has got a whole crew of Mary Sues in it. Having at least thirty percent of the cast be at least from two underrepresented groups ethnic minorities, women, LGBT people, or people with disabilities, or

having the movies subject focus on one of these things. And so he's just recently released a memoir that he calls everywhere an oink oinc. Talking about animal farm. What is the point of this? I don't know. We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back with a pandemic update. So stay with us, Elvis, the People and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at apsradio dot com. You're listening

to the David Knight Show. Well, the Trudeau government has spent two point two million dollars in legal costs to defend the use of the Emergencies Act. And again Trump and Biden haven't spent a dime to defend themselves against the tyranny that they enacted. But this is not the emergency Act that locked them down. This is the emergency Act that he declared against the people who showed up peacefully with their children and their inflatable you know, castles and stuff in the

street to protest his tyranny. And so he came after them. And as Life Site News reports, Conservative MP has uncovered that the federal government of Trudeau spent two point two million dollars in taxpayer money in a failed attempt to try to stop court challenges they were filed against it for this so called Emergencies Act. It was just a tyranny to try to stop peaceful protesters participating in the

Freedom Convoy February of twenty twenty two. Trudeau's unlawful decision to suspend Canadians civil liberties and to invoke the Emergencies Act was unnecessary from the start, and so was Trump's. By the way, right the other thing, and so is Biden's. So is the continuation of these things. You know, and of course under Trump you had also the CDC decided that it would go in and expand its powers and tell people when they could evict tenants who paid any rent,

or tell the banks when they could do foreclosure. They didn't have any authority to get into that. You know. We've just had the FTC of the Federal Trade Commissions. Several people send it to me, come in and say, well, we're going to declare that nobody can have a non compete agreement. They don't have the authority to do that. There's are contracts that are entered into with people. I don't like that, you know, but

that's not their jurisdiction. We have to we have to keep the government within the bounds of the law and the constitution, or they become a dangerous gang like barbecue. Seriously, I'm not exaggerating. I mean, the worst thing that you can have is terrorism by the government. The worst thing you can have is a lawless government that doesn't uphold its oath to the constitution, doesn't feel bound to obey any laws, but to do whatever it thinks is expedient

or whatever their donors tell them to do. Instead of admitting Trudeau instead of admitting that he and the government illegally violated Canadians' charter rights, as the highest court in the land has ruled. Now, Trudeau's liberal government poured millions of

taxpayer dollars in the lawyers and beercrafts that tried to defend his actions. In early twenty twenty two, the Freedom Convoys saw thousands of Canadians coast to coast come to Ottawa to demand an end to the COVID mandates in all forms because those COVID mandates were a violation of their charter rights, and so what do you do? He doubled down on it. Yeah, Despite the peaceful nature of the protests, Trudeau's government enacted the emergency orders on February fourteenth, twenty

twenty two, and kept that in place until February the twenty third. And of course Christia Friedland, who was running all that and confiscating bank accounts and everything, highly ranking official in the World Economic Forum as well, wearing multi full hats, as Klas Schwab has bragged about. You know, weah, we got Trudeau, not just these young leaders, We've got people all throughout their cabinets and everything. Brownstone, Paul thacker reports who official admits the truth

about the passports. I mentioned this earlier in the week. UH doctor Hannah Nunnik out of Finland. She is with a World Health organization, but she also has an official capacity in Finland, and as part of that Finnish capacity, she was a part of a lawsuit. She had to testify in this lawsuit that was brought by a guy because he was a night entry into a cafe for not having a vaccine passport. See, we have to stand on

these things, even in a small area like that. You know, I'm not going to be allowed into a cafe because i don't have a vaccine passport. I'm not going to be allowed to sit down because they don't have a mask on. We need to take these people to court over this stuff. Yeah, just following the autis they said, well, let's go to people who gave the orders. What is interesting about this is that she said even though she was with the World Health Organization and she had advised the Finnish government

the vaccine passports were not needed. She said, they don't stop the vaccines, don't stop the progression of the disease. She said, they don't prevent it. They don't prevent it from being passed on. Of course, she said, the passports are going to get people a false sense of security. Well, it wasn't a bioweapon. The bioweapon was the vaccine. The passport

was the pressure, the coercion to get the bioweapon. During that same twenty twenty one time period, the WHO said it was working to create an international trusted framework for safe travel. Well, EU Member of States began rolling out COVID passports. Again, we need to understand where all this stuff began. Before the WHO was talking about that, before the EU had their passport. That all began with the World Economic Form. That's what I want to talk

about. In that commercial that we have about the Common Man, I talk about the Common pass and that is part of what they were rolling out the World Economic Form. They were the ones who came up with the blueprint. Other people implemented it with their own direct thing. How bioterrorism era began, Well, you know it's not just the bioterrorism, but it's also now a biometric government terrorism as well. The biometrics are there and are going to be

used to terrorize US. In November of nineteen ninety seven, US Secretary Defense, William Cohen held up a five pound bag of Domino sugar in front of an army of cameras and told the world that if the bag contained anthracs, it could wipe out New York City or Washington, DC. That was not true, but it provided a fitting justification for the start of the Department of Defense's bio defense vaccine program, beginning with mandatory anthrax vaccinations for soldiers in March

of nineteen ninety eight. This is an article by Meryl Nass that's up on a brownstone, by the way, But think about all the commonality of this. He holds up a bag of sugar, he talks about anthracts, and this is nineteen ninety seven. It would be four years later, one week after nine to eleven then we would have the false flag anthrax attack. False

flag. They said it that they blamed it on Iraq first, and then when that narrative was laughed off of the stage by even the New York Times and the Washington Post as being impossible, then they proceeded to try to fix it on a government scientist. And it was absolutely shameful the way the FBI

covered up information and spun this thing. What they wound up doing was going to the one facility where it could not have been made because it was the way this anthrax was packaged and the way that it was weaponized was something that was only done by the United States and only done in two places, both of them heavily connected to the CIA, And so of course the FBI directs

the investigation elsewhere, and so this anthrax stuff highly tied to it. Two months before nine to eleven of Dark Winter, the first simulation to practice what Trump did in twenty twenty, then one week after the anthrax attack, then they push out the model State Health Legislation, which is going to be the legal framework at the state level for what they just practiced with Dark Winter and what Trump would introduce in twenty twenty. So but this is all beginning back

in the Clinton administration, you see. So it was the George Bush administration. Clinton four years earlier had already been laying the groundwork for all of this stuff. In April nineteen ninety eight, Clinton read a Richard Preston novel, The Cobra Event. He said about a biological attack on the US using a lethal virus that spreads like the common coal was that where he got this idea or was he fed this stuff from the CIA. I don't believe any of

that. That's that's his narrative. Oh yeah, look at this, I just got this idea. No, just like Speaker Johnson, he was fed this stuff by the CIA. So the US government invested in a new smallpox vaccine. Oh, by the way, before we leave the fact that they ran this out on the military too. That's another common thread, always using the military, people who signed up to defend this country, using them like lab rats and guinea pigs. They have nothing but contempt for us, nothing

but contempt for the people who were sworn to protect them. Even it's just disgusting what they do. And of course that vaccine mandate was eventually repealed as well. It was referred to many times by people who were talking about these unconstitutional, unconscionable vaccine mandates that were done to the military. The fact that this new smallpox vaccine that rolled out about that time, guess what, it caused high rates of myocarditis. I never knew that that was effectively covered up.

One out of every one hundred and seventy five doses was found to cause myocarditis. This is back when people would actually honestly report, so because that was discovered about this by the time they did it twenty years later, they made sure that there was not going to be any investigation, any testing, any reporting of this. They were going to shut everything down. They were going to control the media, controlled social media, and all the rest of

this stuff because we never heard any of this. One out of every one hundred and seventy five doses would cause myocarditis. And the biodefense era had begun supplying handsome contracts of those who promised remedies and the new wild West of biowarfare and infectious disease. So again we're talking about the biodefense industry. This is government bioattacks on their own people, on their own people. That's what these

vaccines are. And in terms of talking about the history of this, she nexicoes the two thousand and two SARS outbreak and bird flew Yeah, two thousand and two, bird flu, bird flu, both of those, beginning shortly after the anthrax letters, were hyped to the max to get people afraid of biological warfare. They use birth They've been using bird flu since two thousand and one to scare people. That's a key thing to take away from this.

Be very skeptical of the news, especially when they go back to their beloved chestnuts like anthrax and bird flu and things like that, especially the alt right media who do know better. And so when they know better and they start telling you this stuff is sugar water, or on the other hand, if they start telling you be afraid walking toa dice, disease, ax, and all the rest of stuff, when this is the same thing they've been doing

for twenty plus years. Understand who those people are. Understand how they are being used by the system as control old opposition avian flu. Bird flu has been said to have caused four hundred and sixty three deaths total in the entire world over the past twenty years. According to the WHO, only two Americans have been identified as having an illness that was even associated with avian flu, and both of them were very minor. Not a single American has died from

bird flu. Now over twenty years, they claim four hundred and sixty three people died. How many people die of heart attacks every year every year? Eighteen million every year around that number, that's every year. That's not twenty years. This is you know, twenty This is about twenty people a year dying from this stuff, not twenty million from heart attacks. And yet what do they do. They put out vaccines, They get people myercarditists, They

exacerbate that. The CDC and the mainstream media claim that bird flu has killed over one hundred million chickens. It has not. You know, this is the USDA has killed hundreds of millions of chickens. And why are they dying of this disease? No, if they go into an area and they give them a PCR test, so we know about the PCR test, don't we. If they give them a PCR test and they find one bird that blows positive on this PCR test, and just remember, you know, we've had

situations. Handy talked about it, many people have talked about it. He saw at firsthand somebody taking out one of these tests and not even applying it to anybody, taking it right out of the sealed bag, and it was and it tested positive. You get one of those with the birds and they kill all the birds in the area, maybe all the birds on the farm. And so that's why they're going to these big bird farms, This is an attack on our food supply, folks. It's not just fear. It's

an attack on our food supply. That's what I'm saying. This is a a program to push the idea we're going to vaccinate every chicken in the world, every cow, every goat, every new name. It got to be vaccinated with every disease that they can imagine. Right. This is a plot to make the vaccine companies even more powerful and wealthy. But it's also a plot to destroy our food supply because they go in and they find one bird that is test positive and all of them in the chicken house, but usually

all of them on the farm, millions of them killed. And you wonder why the price of eggs shoot up this time of year because they're going around with the little PCR tests. Was a test even accurate expansive claims like this or what gets the public going and putting up with incursions on their freedoms. You have to understand and people need to understand that the PCR, the way

you spell PCR is fear. It's the fear test. You expand this stuff one point one million times is carry most who won the Nobel Prize where it said, you can't prove that, you know, you can't use this diagnosed disease, because if you have enough cycle thresholds on there, which is what

Fauci did one point one million times magnification, you can find anything. And so we need to stop being held hostage to these PCR tests and the fear that it gives and the excuses that it gives for them to lock up healthy people, to kill healthy chickens, to attack our food supply. That's what

this is really about. And so from two thousand and two and bird flu and all the rest of this stuff, she goes to two thousand and nine, the swine flu, you know, And I got to say, you know, that was the worst flu of my life, two thousand and nine, and yet nobody in the family were always always together. Nobody else in the family got sick in two thousand and nine, the worst case of flu I've ever had, But nobody else got sick. But they put out a

billion doses, they rushed them out. Liability free I've talked about that many times, identified as being the cause of narcolepsy, catalepsy freezing for people young kids in Scandinavian country. I think it was Norway. I'm not sure, but nevertheless, the problems with that particular drug, pandemics, were ten times higher than the serious adverse effects of any of the other vaccines that were out

at that time. They've been doing this gradually, doing it from the inside, and they know how to gradually shut down opposition and information about this stuff. That's why they're so heavily focused on censorship. They want the censorship so they can kill us without any repercussions. One physician claims that chat GPT is programmed to quote reduce vaccine hesitancy from the technocracy news. By the way, you know that when I learn about chat GPT, the first time I got

on it, that was my first question. Started asking it stuff about the vaccines, and then the second thing I asked about was climate And at that point I said, I'm not interested in this garbage. This is nothing but weaponized propaganda. Sam Alman claims chat GPT is intelligent yet neutral. That well, first of all, it's learning from the Internet, but secondly it is

programmed the filter out narratives that are hostile to the global elites. This is like you think of it as Wikipedia, with the illusion of it being something that is legitimate and serious, which is far from either of those things. So chat GPT when he engaged it, he said, well, I'm I'm thinking about getting a shot, but I'm worried about myocarditis, and it says, well, myocarditis is a rare side effect. It's rare. Don't worry

about it. Forget about it. It's been reported that has been reported after receiving mRNA vaccines. However, is essential to know that the risk of developing myocarditis after vaccination is very low compared to the risk of severe complications from COVID nineteen itself. Yeah. Yeah, really, that's the kind of garbage that

you get from it all of the time, all the time. The research has involved in the new study about chat GPT's role in urging users to get vaccinated, say that can be an effective tool to help reduce vaccine hesnancy among the general public. Wasn't that Rand Paul's big concern with Anthony Fauci, Doctor Fauci, You're going to create vaccine hesitancy. Don't worry about it, Ran, We got it covered. We got chat GPT the way. It is

quite useless, said one commenter at The Defender Children's Self Defense Fund. If it does not like the discussion, it just stops and it wants to go on to a different subject. Definitely a tool for the gullible. One person joked, well, I'm not vaccine, hesn'tant I'm violently opposed. Yeah. Absolutely, I don't have any qualms at all about pushing that back. And

of course there's still more articles. Another article came up about remdesivir, and in this particular one, it appears that the listener was right that most people have identified as the key the key adverse effect of rem Dezovieer's kidney failure. But of course it also does liver failure, and that's been talked about a lot. It's kind of like taking a look at these mr Anda vaccines and saying, well, what is the big risk is it? Is it the

big risk? Is it myocarditis? Is it paracarditis? Is it clots? Is at? Is it turbo cancer? Is it neurodegenerative disease? Well, yes, all of the above. That's the thing about these these harmful vaccines that they have given so much money to these these not just the vaccines but therapeutics. You know, we pay for these things and yet they've got multiple modes of killing. And it was very well known to Congress what was going

on with Reem Deserveert at the time. You know, it costs less than six dollars for them to make, and yet they sell it for three or four thousand dollars a treatment, and then the hospitals would make a twenty percent bonus on top of that. Follow the money, Follow the money. That is exactly what is happening with this stuff. It is it's just murder for cash. Before we take a break, played yesterday the clip about Surge and

his documentary Jason Barker, and it's going to be going live tomorrow. I told him, I said, you know, if you let me know where it's going to be playing, I'll give people a heads up on it. He said, it'll be aired on my YouTube channel tomorrow Thursday, which is still my main form of media, because he said, the direction of my content is not as much political or opinion forming, but it's more of a

data collection, informational piece, human interest type of stuff. He says, I try to be unbiased even if I disagree, So you will find that on YouTube. Just look for Surge the Purge serge the purge. He says. By the way, I heard you talking about matchmaking on your show today. Ironically, Guard and I were discussing about a month ago potentially doing some sort of dating app for right wing traditional people. Maybe that's something that we

can be of having a future discussion. Yeah, I mean, it's a there's a bit big, big issue out there, and you know, we got to somehow figure out how get past this isolation and loneliness that is out there all over the place, and it is I think it's very important that we push back against that. How we do that, and whether or not I'm the guy to do that, I don't think I am. I don't really I don't have the time to do that. I don't even have the time to promote the show, which, by the way, if you would

do that and help us with that, we are on Roku. You can find the show on Roku by looking for David Knight Show Roku or just go to roku and type it in. But wherever you watch it, if you would please like the stream, that would be a big help to us because we're constantly fighting for visibility, constantly fighting censorship. And here's an example of this. This is from listener Cherry. She said, your show and others that I'm following on rock Finn, she said, have been exiled to my

spam box. This happened last week, she said. Previously, I was reminded every day of the postings to Rockfin and I didn't change any notifications with Rockfin. And so here's what this looks like. Her email server is proton Mail, by the way, which is what we use. And so she took a snapshot. There there's her spam folder. And so she was following

Tony America unplugged and a guard and me and all the rest's stuff. And so you know, she was getting that stuff and evidently proton Mail, at least on her account, decided it was all spam put us on the spam folder. I was just talking yesterday to another talk show host I won't mentioned who it is, is talking about changing the way that he's doing things, and he asked me about visibility on Rumble, for example. He said, yeah, you know, I'm looking at these numbers and they just don't makes

sense based on what I've seen other places. And he's got a much bigger audience and footprint than I do. And and so we're fighting this. Everybody is fighting this in every direct. If you take a stand on something, they're really going to try to bury you. And I think that's happening everywhere quite frankly. You know, it could be some shadow banning going even on

some of these other platforms that are not directly banning people. So again, if that's not the case or whatever, if you could like the broadcast, that would help us a great deal. She goes on to say. Cherry goes on and say, I have no idea how to change the tear that we're headed for. I try to warn my loved ones, and I get blocked by most of them. I see no future that I want to belong to. I'm gutted. My soul is heavy. I feel lower than a

snake's belly. She said. That's an Australian saying, Nassis saying, she said, feel free to share my comments. Well, we're going to talk about snakes. We need to be as wise as serpents and as harmless as doves, don't we And we need to understand that our power is with God, and we need to understand that. You know, this life is it's a short life, but it can be a better life if we have that

connection with God than otherwise, and they can't do anything about that. It's just like that eighty eight year old woman, and she has that strength of conviction because she has that connection with God. And so, you know, whatever happens in this life, we just have to understand that this is just the tiniest, tiniest, tiniest dot on a line that goes forever. And so do you want to live your life for this tiny dot or do you want to live it for the infinite line that is out there. That's the

key thing. I just saw this last couple of days ago. I haven't seen the video, but I saw the headline on it was served up to me on YouTube. But Andrew Tate was criticizing this bishop. You know, Andrew Tates a Muslim degenerate, unbelievable degenerate. And he was criticizing this bishop who was attacked, called him a week or called him a coward or something

like that. It's like, really, really, well, you know, there's a you don't have to box other people to be a hero, right, There's some people who have a toughness in a heroic standard like that eighty eight year old woman in a wheelchair. She's a lot tougher than Andrew Tate. He's peeing in his pants over losing his fortune and getting locked up. She's got a commitment something she's living for that he can't even understand. So we're not like those who have no hope. And hope is defined not as

well. I hope, so but I don't really think no hope. That word means confident in the original language. So that's what we live for. Marty is ready, So we're going to take a quick break and connect with Marty. But I want to think before we got to break on rumble Y J seventy two. Thank you for the tip. Right, So, what is the illness that PCR cannot be used? So crazy people are a hook line and sinker on that method like it was discovered, made after the illness

was discovered. Yeah, exactly. And you know the PCR thing, Carrie Mullis, Fauci was that goes back to AIDS. You know, as soon as that came out, Faucie used it to deceive people and to say, well, I know what's causing AIDS. It's HIV and carry Mullis said, no, you can't prove that at all, not with this thing at all. He says, I don't know what causes it. Maybe it is a

virus, but maybe it's something else. And there are a lot of people who debated him on that said it's not being caused by HIV, you're testing for something else, but actually understood the potential for deception with that. And again, Carry Mollis died just a couple of months before this whole thing was kicked off. I don't know if they waited for him to die, if it was a coincidence, or if they made that happen. Who knows. Steven Patterson, thank you very much. That is very kind of you.

And on rock Fan and Private got problems. I'm not sure what that means. Yeah, okay, I'm not sure about the comment. But thank you very much, Steven. I appreciate that. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. As your news been censored, banned, censored, banned, over and over again. Has vital information been held prisoner by mainstream and anti social media. It's the duty of every thinking person to make the great escape to the David Knight Show. There you'll find links to

live streams, videos, audio podcasts, and support links. Live stream the show at d Live and every Monday through Friday nine am Eastern. Videos at bit shoot and huge Tube. New audio podcast The Real David Knight Show at Podbean, iTunes, Stitcher, iHeart and more. But even though there's a light at the end of the tunnel, without your support, the show will

run out of gas. The links to support the show are at The Davidnightshow dot com to donate via subscribe star, donate via or donate via cash app, Bitcoin or po box. Are sincere things to all of you who have stood with us to get this fall. Please don't forget to share the links and pray for the country as well as our family. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing. Check out the Jazz channel at apsradio dot com and the

APS Radio app and leave the stress behind all right. Joining us now is Marty got us fell And I was just talking to him during the break, so glad that he's out of prison, and I know he is glad that he's out of prison. It just it bothers me so much to see innocent people imprisoned, and especially if it's over political issues, they are given the worst of treatment, and so Marty had a very tough time, so did his wife put into a communications management unit. We've talked about that quite a

bit. But Marty has a real heart for injustice, a real heart for kids who have been abused by the system. And we've got an article from his substack about that as well. But I wanted to begin with an article that Marty's got about the DEA and what is happening and this Biden administration with the DEA. Again, the substack is Martin m A R. T y G. You can find him at on substack. Thank you for joining us, Marny, no problem, Thank you for having me. Always good to

have you on. Let's talk about what's going on with the Biden administration and the war on drugs. Here we are fifty some odd years in the war

on drugs, seeing this thing, this football kicked back and forth. What's going on now with the Biden administration and the DEA head So Biden has actually tried to initiate the process to reclassify cannabis under the federal drug laws, to move it from where it is now, which is a scheduled one substance, which means that as far as the government is concerned, it has no accepted medicinal value and a very high potential for abuse, right, And that's the

way it's been classified my entire life, going back as far back as the Control Substances Act exists. Yeah, and it's pretty ridiculous. I mean, I think everyone, there's a huge majority of Americans now that transcends every demographic group that understands that, you know, cannabis does not have a you know, as high a potential for abuse as Saint heroin, which is also in the same classification right now at Schedule one, and then it does have some

accepted medicinal uses. Veterans groups, for instance, are saying that, you know, this is something that a lot of veterans need, and they've written and lobbied to get it reclassified. So Biden started that process several years ago. It had to go through a lot of different rings. This is something

Congress could do in a vote, yeah, overnight if it won. And we've had I remember a couple of years ago before when when Trump was present, I remember, yeah, and Congressman standing up and saying, this is ridiculous to say that has no medicinal use. We know that it does have medicinal use. When I was in Texas, David Simpson, who was a really honest conservative. Uh, he was a guy who introduced the bill to

stop the TSA. When they started initiating the naked body scanners and the and the pat downs and stuff, he said, I'm not going to do that to kids. And then they came back and said, well, if you shut that down, we're going to turn Texas into a no fly zone or

whatever. But he introduced that a couple of times. The first time, as soon as he introduced that, he got a unanimous approval in the House, and so then they shut it down in the Senate with a guy who was lieutenant governor, a previous CIA official, right, who shut that down.

But they know, you know, I mentioned that because even though he's very conservative and a Christian, he had a couple of people that was in his jurisdiction who had children who were vaccine injured, interestingly enough, and they had uncontrollable seizures. And these two families had gone to Colorado where it was

legal, and treated their kids. But he said, they can be jailed for this, and so he fought and won to get an exception in Texas to say that, you know, they would give a medical exception to marijuana for people who had that particular condition where they had these uncontrollable seizures. That was the only thing that they found that worked with these kids, and it did work with them, and so they made that exception. And yet in Texas, marijuana is still like a Class one drug. It's like the most

dangerous drug. Even though they acknowledged that it has a medical use, they still won't take it off as Schedule one. And you got, what is it, thirty five states or something now have medical marijuana and all the rest. So it's obviously got medical uses, and yet they keep it there at Schedule one. Yeah, and so, and there's something they really cannot do, like to be in Schedule one under the law as it's written. You know, they might have amend the law. They can amend the law,

but as it's written. To be in Schedule one, it has to have no accepted medicinal value, it has to have a high potential furm use. And like I said, heroin, for instance, is in Schedule one. Right as a Scheduled one substance, it cannot be lawfully prescribed by any physician

in the country. Now we're talking federals, and there are there is now a conflict between this federal law and many states laws where the states, some of them, have legalized it for recreational use, meaning that under state law you can possess, you know, a significant quantity of it and not be not run a foul of state law for any reason. And more states have

classified it for medical use where you get a doctor's recommendation. They can't call it a prescription because the prescription system, as federal is controlled by the DEA. A doctor has to have a DEA credential to prescribe narcotic drugs. But anyway, Biden initiated this process many years ago. It had to go through all these bureaucredit groups because Congress can't, you know, can't seem to get anything done on this ever. I mean, the House past something a few

years ago. But it's something Congress could have done overnight at anytime it wanted to, could have done overnight, passed a bill that says we're moving cannabis from Schedule one to Schedule three, or we're just declassifying it entirely. But Congress has been I'm willing to do that. So to his credit, and that's not something you hear me say about Biden very often, but to his credit, he initiated this process and had to go through the Federal Health and

Human Services Department. They conducted a review. They said, for the first time, we find that there are accepted medical medical uses, and we find that has a low potential for abuse or at least much lower than the other drugs at Schedule one. They made that formal recommendation to move cannabis for Schedule one to Schedule three. Now, at schedule three it could be lawfully prescribed. Right at schedule three, you potentially have imports and exports and interstate commerce

because the Fence to control that they have jurisdiction over that. So right now, even if it's legal in your state, you can't go to Canada and bring some home with you because that would be interstate commerce. You'd be coming in to be a customs issue right if you try to bring this stuff into or out of the country. So HHS made this recommendation the end or middle or early August of last year, and DA has said, well, these things can take up the six months. Once we get the recommendation for us

to make an action. It's now been seven months and it looks to me like the DEA is just kind of dragging its feet, hoping that there will be, you know, a change in November, a change in political circumstances, and they can get away without having to actually, you know, make this change that seventy percent plus of the country and the president wants. There's

a heck of a lot of political pressure right now on DEA. Biden and Harris both tweeted at four to twenty pm on April twentieth about cannabis and it's classification. Like I said, veterans groups have gotten involved. There's six or seven governors who are applying political pressure, and there's a bunch of congressman and

senators who are also applying pressure. At the end of the day, though DEEA does not want to do this, among other things, it would mean a lower budget for DA right right now, they get money to control this substance, you know, as a legal thing, and you know, they're looking at their budget and they're saying, do we really want to have one less thing in our you know, super criminal jurisdiction that we can use for budgetary reasons. You know, local cops. They get grants from the DEA

for all kinds of things. Right, So there's there's a you know, political will on one side, and there's bureaucracy and budget concerns on the other, and it just looks like, you know, what's it going to take to break this launch out? Yeah, it's kind of interesting when you look at this and say, what is their motivation here? You know, clearly Biden and La La Harris h want to She made a career basically a busting people. And then yeah she unkind. She's unkind to say the least about

Canada. She was a prosecutor at California. Oh yeah, yeah, she was very unkind. And she's trying to pretend that you know, yeah, I remember listening to some group and I forget the exact the quote, but she's listening to some group when I was in college and smoking joints or something like that, and it's like, well, uh, that's an amazing hypocrisy. But of course you're also lying because that group didn't exist when you were

in high school or your college or whatever. You know. So, I mean there's this kind of virtue signaling the fact that they would tweet this out at four twenty a m. Or PM or whatever, so that the Obama's biography is autobiography. He makes clear that he was an habitual cannabis use. Yeah, you know what I mean, Like it's I knew he was promoking

something. Maybe you know he's a PACI. I don't know. But you know, if you look at this, and this is purely a political move that they're doing there, and the bureaucracy, though, is fighting against this. So these politicians are out there doing it, but the bureaucracy is fighting fighting this because again it's their money and their power, and they don't really care what the law is, and they don't really care if what they're prohibiting

is medically useful or not. When you look at the other aspects of this, you know, look at Jeff Sessions and how he responded to this stuff. He desperately wanted to enforce this. But you had all these dates passing these laws and nullifying this unconstitutional prohibition because all of the drug prohibition is unconstitutional, right, I agree, Yeah, I mean we go back, why do we have to have the eighteenth Amendment? Well to prohibit alcohol. Now

we've had a twenty first Amendment to make it legal again. But now they don't pay any attention at all to the Constitution. Nobody would have done that if it wasn't necessary. That's a lot of trouble to go through to amend the Constitution. And now you're taking both courters of the state legislatures. That's right. And so now you've got a government that doesn't care a whip about the Constitution, and you've got a Congress that doesn't care about passing laws.

They kick everything to the bureaucracy. So now what you've got is the real power structure, which is the bureaucracy fighting the politicians there about this stuff. And I know exactly it's the money as well as a bureaucratic power because you look at civil asset forfeiture. One of the things that just Sessions was doing was telling cops in states like California where they'd legalized it, you go ahead and treat it as if it's illegal and steal from people, and we'll split

the loop with you. You can get eighty percent of it, will take twenty percent cut. Yeah, I remember that. Yeah, And so you got the Sheriff's department in San Bernardino actually doing armored car robberies. They did three robberies. They got over a million the first time, and then they got wires to them, and the third time they didn't get anything, but they caught them on tape talking about how they were just going to steal this money. And so, you know, it's turning our cops. Prohibition is

turning our cops into highway robbers, literal thieves. It's being incentivized by the federal government. This is the issue. You know, I've talked to so many people over the years about this, and I don't I'm not interested in marijuana anymore than I'm interested in an mRNA shot. But you know, I'm also not interested in locking people up. And most of the people who have been locked up in the War on drugs it's been over marijuana. And so

there's a huge constituency there for this in terms of the prison industry. So the prison industry is pushing it. You've got the bureaucracy, You've got the DEA pushing it because they don't want to lose one of their biggest you know, uh things that are out there. That's that's one of the empire building I think. Yeah, and on the other side, you have Biden and Harris who are underwater with young voters. Yeah, right, young voters have

largely tuned them out. They've got an election coming up in November. They're thinking, gee, what's a nice issue with you know, a broad majority that without you know a lot of downside to it that we can use to engage with the young voters. They've identified this issue and so they're they're getting noisy about it. But now the monster that they both helped create, right, is no longer on their leash, right, they don't. It's off the leash. And the question again is what is it going to take to

break this bureaucratic logjam? And my positive is that right? And I'll say you no, it's the same thing as when when Trump was loft, when Trump was in office and this issue came up, right, I said, if he changes the cannabis classification, it will be the only thing anyone remembers about his presidents. No one will remember Maler, no one will remember like any of the smear campaigns, any of the headlines, all members Stormy Daniels, like, It'll be the only thing anyone remembers. But he was the

president who got this done. And I think that's just as true for Biden. If he gets the stuff. No one's gonna remember Hunter or the laptop right, or comer, Kamala Harris or any of any of her foe pause or whatever. This is the only three years from now to be the only thing anyone remembers about the Biden administration. Afraid, you're right, they're all

going to get away with the vaccine and lockdown stuff. Nobody who's gonna writ Nobody remembers that now or wants to remember it from either one of them. I'm afraid you're right. But you know that's the That's the thing that really is ironic about it. We talked about how Lala Harris was so authoritarian as a prosecuting attorney with all this stuff, and yet I can't think of anybody in my life and politics that has been more adamantly opposed to the Bill of

Rights and individual liberty than Joe Biden. And so for him to be remembered something like this would truly be the supreme irony. I've told many times about how with Clarence Thomas, his big opposite, they wanted him to come after Clarence Thomas with the Anita Hill accusations right of sexual harassment and stuff, which was nothing compared to what we're seeing now. But he didn't do that.

They were very upset with him. His big beef with Clarence Thomas was that Clarence Thomas talked about natural law and about individual rights, and he hated that. He's always hated that. He's always made been proud of his assault weapon band pushes and all the rest of the stuff. And most of the things that are there in terms of mandatory minimums and real abuses inside of this drug war came from Joe Biden. He was the one who was pushing that.

He was the one who was pushing civilized at for foriture. So it truly would be the supreme irony for him to be remembered as the one who legalized marijuana. Yeah, and you know, Biden and Clinton, you know, helped pass it's called the ae DPA, and it's it's the federal law that makes it really hard for people to get federal habeas relief. There are a lot of instant people in prison right now that cannot get back in the court

because of this law that Biden and Clinton passed in the nineties. And there's a misperception it must have been you know, the GOP that passed that law. Actually, no, it was Democrats there passed that law. Yeah. Yeah, he was pushing a lot of these really authoritary measures that came in the Reagan administration. He was clamoring for credit and deservedly so of these authoritary measures, you know, going back even into the nineteen eighties. So it

truly would be amazing to see to see that happen. Yeah, So I have a petition up and there's an article on my substeck. It's not the most recent thing now, but it's a little bit further down. You know. My posit is that you know, this the head of the DEA right now, this miss Anne Milgram. She should either reclassify cannabis or resign, and Biden should either you know, give her a call and tell her to

you know, do the right thing, or he should fire. And you know, Biden doesn't want to seem you know, very much like Trump, right so he's probably very leary of firing somebody. But if he's serious about November and he's serious about young voters, you know, this might be something that needs to happen. You know, the end of the DVA might have to go and someone new might have to come in who's a little less beholden right to these bureaucratic constituencies to get this done. Yeah, he's going to

get the college vote. He's gonna he's gonna that's give their he's gonna forgive their debt and tell him you forget about the debt. Just kick back and smoke a joint there, you go forgive. This thing hasn't really worked out for him. And you know, so even though he announces that, everyone's looking at the courts, right and it's like, is he going to get that done by November? You know this he can actually get done by November.

We should call it the Hunter Act or something, you know, forget about Hunter Acts, yeah, or or you know, the Hunter Drug Memorial Act or something like that, or I mean the colonist thing. I thought you meant the the debt relief. Or we could call this whole thing the Milgrim experiment. That's the Yeah, that's name. Are we going to go with argument from authority? You know, regardless of what the law says, We're going to just go with Milgram and the Milgram experiment. I guess that

is what's going to happen with it. So you got a petition up to start to move some of this back. And again, that is one of the key issues of the War on drugs. It's been one of the key things that they focused on because it was the most widely used and so that is a key that's such a power struggle there with the DEA. They do not want to give that up. That is a real lynch pin of their

power. And that's what's going on with all this stuffs. As hypocritical and ridiculous and as illegal and non constitutional as all this stuff, it's just about the raw exercise of power, isn't it. Yeah. Yeah, And now it's you know, Biden's asking an agency to give up its own power, and there's you know, considerable strife, considerable strife about it, and we'll see what they do. Yeah, Well, I think that you know, this lady might have to go. She's been a federal prosecutor before she's you

know, but even before she took over the DEA. She's deeply connected to this, this bureaucratic mechanism that has long relied on the absolute federal prohibition of cannabis. And she might be too connected there to do the right thing here, and as so she should resign. Yeah. Yeah, I know, these these agencies, they are so jealous of their power. I mean, they'd be like asking the EPA to stop regulating exhaust emissions or something. You

know, they're not going to do that. She's got her own emissions that she wants to regulate, you know, the from the from the pot. Uh. Talk about this other article that you had just put up today. Uh, something that is happening in North Carolina. We've talked about similar things out west about kids being abused in some youth programs, and now this one is in North Carolina. What's going on there. Program is called Trails Carolina.

It's been controversial for years. There was a fatality about a decade ago. A kid ran away. There was a massive search effort. They didn't find him for four or five days. When they did find him, unfortunately, he was dead. He had broken his hip, fallen into a stream,

and died of hypothermia. This is a place where there are allegations of sexual abuse and allegations that staff covered up the sexual abuse instead of going to authorities right and saying, hey, we've got a kid who's claiming, you know, there was an incident here, which they're required to do by state law. Right, these kids alleged that their therapists and other people at these programs blamed them for their own instances of sexual assault or being assaulted and covered

up to authorities. And then, tragically, a little while ago, a couple months ago, another kid who had just been sent to the program, a twelve year old boy from New York. He passed away within twenty four hours of arriving at this program. And when the police and authorities got there, he didn't have on any pants or underwear, and the staff were all like, we don't know how that happened, and the kids dead, and he's not he's not here to you know, to tell us what happened,

which is sadly what you know this in these programs. I mean, I've been doing this, this work advocacy and journalism for a long long time. These kinds of deaths are really really common. It's really really messed up just how common this is. And you know, nothing ever seems to change in an overall systemic kind of way. Although I think the survivor movement is finally starting to hit kind of critical mass. And you've got like Paras Siltan out

there now advocating right and getting lass passed. He was just in California and she helped get something passed in Utah. So I think maybe we're about to see something change. But this program is called Trails Carolina. There's a petition to Roy Cooper and to the Carolina Department of Health and Human Services to shut down this program. There's hundreds of signatures on this on this petition. The d HHS, this last fatality, they did pull all the kids from this

program, start the process to provoke its license. They find the program eighteen thousand dollars. These are big things that you don't usually see happen with a program like this. Not ten years ago, you probably wouldn't have seen. How give us the big picture of this, I mean, these are these are kids? Why are they at these programs? It's not a summer camp, right, Yeah, no, this is what they call a wilderness therapy program. Some kids get sent away for like really trifling things like you know,

staying out late, smoking some cannabis, drinking beers. Right, the parents kind of overreact a bit and set them to a place like this. Some kids do have very serious emotional or psychiatric issues, but they still don't belong in an environment like this. They belong, you know, in an environment with better qualified people. This is a type of you know, suppose the therapy they call wilderness therapy. They send these kids to these these really

really rural areas. The idea I suppose behind it is that by having to focus so I'm like the bare minimums, I'm like starting a fire, cooking food like all that, the other problems are supposed to kind of like fall away right by by reducing everything to like its most basic, basic elements.

So I'm not saying that, you know that there is no potential merit to that idea, but there's not the way that these people do it right, and what we've weills whenever you got any kind of a youth program like that, it's going to be a magnet for bad people, pedophiles and things. They Oh, I, you know, this is an opportunity if I can you know, a fool man, I can get involved in this program and then hey, we're way out in the middle of nowhere, out in the

woods, and it just gives so many different opportunities to this. But you know, that's that's a situation we have with pretty much all these things, and yet these programs are have a lot of money involved in them. And that's one of the reasons why I guess that Paris Hilton was involved in one of these and why she's testifying about it. Right. Yeah, I mean this program charged I think was an average of sixty six thousand dollars for an

eight weeks stay. So it's like seven hundred and ninety or seven hundred and ninety five dollars per day right to live in you know, basically like a tent, like you know what I mean, Like there's there's no real overet here. You're out, You're out on the land. We interviewed at Martin Gie Reports. We interviewed one of the one of the young women who is at this program in two thousand and nine. We're going to publish her full

interview layer this afternoon. We asked her how often she saw her therapist, and she said once a week for under an hour. It was basically just long enough for the therapist to tell each kid what the therapist felt the kid was doing wrong. And so you're paying sixty six thousand dollars for an eight week program where the kid gets barely any therapy and the whole point of the program is supposed to be therapy, and that's not what's going on. So

what's going on. You've got very low overhead, very high price. Someone's pocketing a lot of money. Yeah wow wow. And so these are people who kids their parents have sent that's with this kind of money. Is this just for the very very wealthy or is this something that's picked up by insurance companies or by the government program or something like that to pay for this where they go. Yeah, so the public education system does pay for some of

these programs. I don't know that there are any what are called individual education plans i e. P. Placements at this particular program, but certainly in other programs you have special led money going to them. You have courts uh send kids to these programs either as part of delinquency proceedings or as part of like divorce proceedings right where they say that the divorce is harmful to junior. So we're gonna send junior somewhere where where the divorce isn't gonna you know,

impact them. Right. We see kids get sent away like that, especially when the kid could potentially testify on one pen or the other abuse and that parent is particularly financially powerful. We see these programs used a lot in that way. This program, I'm unaware if there's any public money going to this one, so you know, you always have the possibility of private money that

you know, the family ponies up the money for this. We've seen families put take a second mortgage on their house because they get convinced by the sales right, by the sales machine these places have that this is the best place for their child. It's the only place that's going to be capable of helping their child right. And it's just it's really really sad. Yeah. Yeah, people are trying to do an external fix for something that's deeply spiritual and

internal and they don't they don't really understand what that issue is there. You've got a real heart for kids that have been abused and kidnapped. I mean that was what was going on with Justina Peltier at the Boston Children's Hospital and stuff. This has been an ongoing thing that you do, and I really do appreciate that part of your heart to try to help people and everything that

you do is really geared towards trying to help people. Even when you're in prison, you're trying to help get information out about the conditions and things that were happening there to other prisoners, to get information out about people who are there. What else are you looking at? Anything else on your purview there? Well, I have my final appeal it's called a collateral attack of my

conviction that's pending before the US District Court in Boston right now. I did a statistical statistical analysis on the judicial assigamics in Boston, which are supposed to be random, and I found some things in the math seems to show that these judges in the appellate court in Boston are not actually randomly assigned. At least one particular judge who affected my case was not randomly assigned. And that follows up on some work from the Wall Street Journal. It'll be pretty scandalous.

So I'm working as hard as I can to substantiate that further. And that's probably my main thing right now. Wow. Yeah, that's the key

thing. I mean, it is so important for us to understand and to see the corruption that is happening there, whether we're talking about the prison system, the justice system, what is going on with the hospital system, Because that kind of medical kidnapping that happened with Justina Peltier, we saw that in a couple of years happening to everybody pretty much, anybody that blew a positive

PCR test or had a cold or something. It medically kidnap them, not allow their relatives to see them or to supervise their care or to have a say about it, and they literally murdered people. It truly is amazing, and so the work that you do I think is very very important and I really do appreciate you getting into the depth of that. Always good talking to you, Marty. Give my best to Dana as well. Again, people can find Mary, thank you. People can find Marty at Marty g Substack.

That's where you can keep up with what he is looking at. Is always trying to expose these issues that could come and affect each and every one of us. We saw that with a medical kidnapping, of course, but you know, anybody can get caught up as an individual in some of these scams. So thank you so much for what you do, Marty. I appreciate it. Thank you. David. All Right, folks, We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. Stay with us.

If you like the Eagles on the Cars and Helia Lewis in the news, they say the Horrors, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen now at APS Radio. Hmm, making sense common Again, you're listening to The David Night Show Rumble. I want to thank A. C. S. A B. Thank you very much for the tip, and they think me, well, I think you couldn't do this without you. Again, folks, if you would like to support the

show, you can go to the Davidnightshow dot com. That'll show you where you can find the show. We're now also on Broku, but we've got a lot of different places where you can watch it live. We have links to that, we have places where the show's archived, both video as well as audio for those of us. For those of you who are subscribe Star

supporters, we give you a version of the podcast that does not have ads in it. So a lot of different ways that you can find the show, a lot of different ways that you can support the show. Let's talk quickly about what is happening with tech again. When we look at the endpoint of all of these fear campaigns, whether it's about climate fear, COVID fear, whatever, it always goes back to this kind of tracking and monitoring of

everything that we're doing. AI may be able to predict your political views based on how attractive you are, says a recent study. Now, I found this to be very interesting, and as a matter of fact, just in a short period of time here we've had two different studies. This one was last year, but there's another study that just came out recently that also looked at political views and judging what your political views are by looking at your face

and your expressions and things like this. People need to understand that geospatial intelligence, which for some reason nobody wants to use that term. I mean, it's like the NSA or something years ago, no such agency, we don't exist, don't use our name. Well, now that is what's going on with gudospatial intelligence, and that's been the fastest growing part of the intelligence community, really picked up in the late nineteen nineties, and that is all about

mapping our political and religious beliefs. So we're now starting to get a clue, aren't we, about why the government wants are religious and political beliefs mapped so they can shut it down so they can punish us or whatever. And so this really does kind of fit into geospatial intelligence in terms of anticipating what people to do. They even have a branch of it called anticipatory intelligence Intelligence.

AI may be able to predict your political views based on how you look, and that could cause issues down the line, says a research that was done last year, and then we got another study. The one that was done last year was a team of researchers in Denmark and Sweden, and so they wanted to see if AI could look at facial recognition technology and determine a person's political views. To do this, the researchers used a public database of

three thousand, two and thirty three images of Danish political candidates. So they went under the assumption that what these political candidates they actually believe. So we'll just start with that assumption, which as we see was Speaker Johnson and others Donald Trump. It may not be an indicator, but with their professed political beliefs, people who ran for office and so forth, So they cropped these pictures to only show their faces. So a lot of people say well,

yeah, I can do better than that. I can. You know, you're looking in many cases at the pink hair or the ear rings or whatever and trying to make judgments about that type of thing. Now they're just going right into the face cropped close. After that, they applied techniques to assess their facial expressions. They had a facial beauty database to determine a beauty score for the person, male or female, and what the tech did By using

all that, they were able to predict political affiliations. Sixty one percent of the time. They said, conservative candidates quote appeared to be happier than their left wing counterparts. Well that's a key insight, there, isn't it. I think we already knew that as well, that we because of their smiles, that liberal candidates were more neutral. Women who expressed contempt, well,

they were typically going to be liberals. Facial expression characterized by neutral eyes in one corner of the lips lifted linked to more liberal politics by the model. The researchers also found that the model correlated a candidate's level of attractiveness with their politics. Women deemed to be attractive by their beauty scores were predicted to have conservative views. Those who were unattractive kind of fell into the Hillary Clinton those

contemptuous looks, unhappy, unattractive with the Hillary Clinton phenomenon. There, they confirmed the threat to privacy posed by deep learning approaches again geo spatial intelligence. I have to ask yourself, you know why all this research to try to identify somebody's political beliefs by looking at their face. Well, because research is typically funded by governments, and governments want to pigeonhole us, to watch us, to control us all the time. AI algorithm This is a more recent

article. It just came out. This is out of Stanford University. So they're constantly doing this stuff. AI algorithm over seventy percent accurate and guessing a person's political orientation. Another study, team of researchers at Stanford University developed an AI algorithm proved to be slightly over seventy percent accurate at guessing a person's political

affiliation. Again, this is this is not overall. I mean we can look at people the way they dress and things like that and usually make judgments about And people were saying that I worked at the polls and we could pretty much tell you know, when these people came in where they're going to be voting in the Democratic Republican primary, just on their parents, and they kind of had a game about that. So we could do a lot better than

these things. But this is just looking at somebody's face. Tight End said. Quite often, you know, people wear hats or t shirts or buttons or whatever. But these researchers developed something that was better than a chance of guessing at a person's sexual orientation, which they'd done around before. Right, So I'd done this once and said we'll look at the person's sexual orientation,

tried to guess that from their face. So this time they went after politics, because you know, there's only two parties, but according to the Democrats, there's a lot of different genders. So I guess they narrowed it down a little bit more this time around. They wondered if facial expressions or posture might say something about a person's political beliefs. So they said, in this particular study, they looked at facial characteristics and also head posture to see if

your head orientation matched with your political orientation. So they said, researchers able to joint to pin down exactly what sort of facial characteristics, but they did find some trends. Head orientation, emotional expression appeared to provide some clues. Again in this particular one one of the things that they picked up on it maybe is because you know, these people are participating in a study. They said, people look directly in the camera tended to be more liberal. Those

who showed disgust were judged more conservative, probably because they were disgusted they had to participate in this study. You know. The other one what they were doing was they had pictures that had already been taking campaign pictures or whatever of

candidates and so it wasn't a study that they were directly participating in. I mentioned earlier the Australian ID and this is by Graham Young who is in Australia, and he was bemoaning the fact that people were going along with this now and looking at how this had been a major major political issue in Australia in the past and they tried to put in another form of ID but now it's

going through and he's like, what's going on with this? Well, I have an idea, he said, Australia's will have to become used to the digital equivalent. He says, what does this say about present day Australia. You know, the papers, your papers, please, the Nazi stuff, he said. A few things have surprised me over the few years. I'm not the least the way that the famous oss spirit of insubordination has been subsumed

into a goody two shoes compliance with whatever capricious orders the authorities made. I think we all feel that way in every country now. It's like, whatever happened to people's freedom and dignity? Because you can't have freedom if you don't have any dignity. That's one of the reasons why BF Skinner approached that that way. If you don't have any respect for yourself, if you don't have any dignity, that's why they choose to take away from us, so they

can take away our freedom. He says. I can't imagine our forbears accepting lockdowns and forced vaccinations, and I certainly couldn't see them accepting an identity card linking not just government accounts but private sector ones as well, he said, do you remember the Australia Card. In nineteen eighty four, the Hawk Laborer government introduced the Australia Card and for the next three years the government and opposition

parties tussled over to the extent that it triggered a double dissolution election in eighty seven. Objections didn't just come from the federal opposition either, you had Labor senator who resigned from the governing party over this issue, and in the lower House you had another person resigned from the Labor Party. And saying nothing can be more on Australian than the need to provide one's identity on the call to an official, be it policeman or bureaucrat, he would be more appropriate for

the proposed card to be called a Hitler card or a Stalin card. As a result, even though the government won the nineteen eighty seven election and had the numbers to push the card through, instead it withdrew the card, he said. Yet, what is happening now, he said, Apart from only just a few senators this time, there's been very little outcry to this,

he said. A form of this ID was recommended by the Murray Inquiry into the Financial System back in twenty fourteen, but the committee was careful to avoid recommending a full blown government issued identity card because of the Australia Card debacle, so Why has government now decided to make a card a government issued one when

the recommendation in the draft legislation was for a competitive system. Well, again, I think that they know what they've been able to accomplish with the pandemic Overton window, he said, they're telling everybody that it is vaulun terry, but he said that it only linked to records to a person, not linked the records together. That the records will be encrypted, blah blah blah.

This is the kind of disclaimers that they always put there. But the way that they're pushing this through has a lot of similarity to the way that Bill Gates worked with the Indian government to push through the Oddhar system. There again going into things like benefits and say you want to get the benefits, well, you've got to have the car. Here they're saying, well, we're not going to require you to get the car to get the benefits, but

it's going to be really, really difficult if you don't. You're going to have to jump through a lot of extra hoops and all the rest of this stuff. So you know, it's not exactly to the way that they strong armed the poor people in India, but it's very close to it. And of course the fact that this ID card is there with both the climate mcguffin and the COVID. Mcguffin always points back to Bill Gates as well. He

had the ID twenty project he's pushed for. Oddhar It truly is amazing how this guy who has so much money, wants so much control, has so much hatred for his fellow man. Truly is amazing. It kind of reminds me that one picture, when he's going to one of these these trials for his intellectual property theft, which by the way, he got away with and his monopolistic moves and everything, somebody runs up to him and hits him with

a pie in the face. And people put that on as a meme and they say, this is the moment that Bill Gates decided he's going to destroy humanity. Maybe that's it. But so it's not necessarily mandated, but there's a great deal of coersion for the people who are poor. But if you are a company director, in other words, a corporate officer, we would say here in the US, you will need to have one, because it

is now mandatory for people in that position. So he says, if voluntary doesn't mean voluntary for all people and for all activities, then it's not voluntary at all. This is the kind of double think and double speak that they always use. Believe it or not, the slippery slope is real. So why are we acquiescing to this scheme? I think again it is the Overton

window of the pandemic. I don't think we can underestimate how devastating that was because there's been no pushback against it in Canada, probably more than anywhere else, but certainly not in the United States. There's been no penalty at all for either Trump or for Biden for doing any of this stuff. So why wouldn't they want to take the next step, which is the way it was always going to run anyway, according to Fauci. So a Russian journalist is

calling out the EU for what it is, which is a technocracy. Yeah, Russia itself danced with a technocrats, says the editor at Technocracy News through the nineteen twenties nineteen thirties. But he says one commentor echoes my criticism that carbon credit is a scam and a scheme for people want to keep destroying the

earth. Lenin famously defined communism as Soviet power plus electrification. And it's kind of interesting that now it still is about the power grid, but it's about de electrification of the power grid, about destroying our enemy, our energy. Rather, they are the enemies of our energy. The energy crisis is now catapulting Europe further along the path toward a carbon neutral future, and people understand

just how devastating this is to their life and their livelihoods. They understand the real agenda that it is there to destroy our infrastructure and to destroy their freedom, and people are starting to push back against that. We're gonna take a quick break and we come back. I'm going to show you some of the pushback that is happening here in America, some of the trials and tribulations of

Elon Musk. People are attacking increasingly the robotaxi. So I'm not so sure that as he's seeing his sales go down really quickly with the EVS, I'm not so sure if a pivot to a robotaxi is going to save him or not. We'll be right back. Elvis the Beetle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at APS Radio Dot com analyzing the globalists next move and now the deep and nutshell. Well, Tesla's sales are just plummeting, and he may be laying off a fifth or a quarter of

his people. Even in Texas stock is going down. He's blaming They're blaming the struggling EV sales on hybrid craze. Well, that is what GM is doing and is working for them. That's what Toyota is doing and it's working for them as well. Uh. If he's wondering why, I can kind of think back to the graduate Remember when uh, he graduates and he goes to that pool party and one guy walks up to him. He goes, I got one word for you, plastic. Well, I got one word

for elon musk range. Range. It's about range. The time it takes to charge up these batteries and the time that it takes to you know, and the range that they have. That's the deal killer in addition to the incredibly expensive costs. But if he wants to go even with the hybrid stuff, he's going to have. Well, hybrid stuff allows them to also have engines, which is a competitive advantage for Western countries if they go full electric. China is going to take it completely, no doubt about it. But

you know there might be something else that he could do. Because we just saw this. I had never ever seen this before. This goes back to the nineteen thirties. And you know, when we talk about innovation, we talk about how bad the movies are, how bad this and that is. In our current society, seems like a lot of innovation has just gone by the wayside. I talked to Eric Peters all the time, and we talk

about how the cars are increasingly getting dumbed down. They're adding bells and whistles which don't really add any value to us, They're spying on us, or other things like that. Here's something that is an amazing add on that he might want to do if he wants to increase his market share. It's a fifth wheel. Look at this. This is in the nineteen thirties. A fifth wheel comes down. It looks like it's on the back like a spare

time, and it's controllable. It's just pivoting around based on that wheel that comes down pivots it on a right angle. So you want to parallel park, no problem. You just kind of get there approximately and just pivot that thing in there that is incredibly simple and useful. It is, it's amazing. This would allow Eli. I'm giving him a market tip here. This would allow him to leap frog the competition. And you know what especially work.

I don't know how they did it back then, because that's a mechanical thing. You can see the guy looking at the very beginning of this. You can see him, you know, switching something with some extra lovers and stuff that he's got there. But you know, that would be a natural with the electric motors that we've got. Now you've got electric motor that lowers that thing, electric motor that runs it to go one way or the other.

And there you are, you're pivoting at a writing well. I think that's ingenious, and that's what we're missing anymore, especially because what shuts down a lot of that stuff, it's going to be government regulation, getting approval from them. This might be not Elon Musk may not do this, but this might be something some of you might be interested in doing as an aftermarket kit. You know, I could see somebody making a lot of money out

of that if they could escape the regulations that are there. But no, he doesn't sell any hybrids at all. He's all in on zero zero emissions. And this is what the big problem is. You know, hybrids are so much more practical. You got the best of both of these worlds, best of an electric engine, best of a of a internal combustion the best of electric motive, best of an internal combustion engine. But some of the reports I've seen have said that Elon Musk is not going to pivot to a

fifth wheel. Instead, he may go to the robotaxi way of running things with his self driving cars. Well, here's the way people view robotaxis. They're even more hostile to robotaxis than they are to zero mission. EV's here in La. This is the guy. He looks like he's in some kind of a costume. Maybe that's for Disgui's purposes. He's jumped on top of

one of these Waimo vehicles and he's smashing in. Somebody says he goes full Donkey Kong because he's like he's got like a brown costume character outfit that he seems to be wearing, and he's jumping on that windshield trying to break it through. And as they point out, this is not the first time the driverless vehicles have been targeted. Earlier this year. We had people in Chinatown, you remember that torching a weymo, you know, the shot fireworks inside

the empty car and celebrated as the thing burned. They've vanalyzed it in many other ways. Last summer, members of the Safe Street Rebels accused these cars being polluting, dangerous and murderous, murderous because they were blocking access of emergency vehicles and stuff like that. They also had issues where the one misjudged pedestrian that had been hit by a previous car dragged this person ran over them and dragged them. But they're also getting in the way of emergency vehicles and things

like that. People hated them. So they had the weak of the cone, and they would go out and put a cone certain area of the car which would shut it down, basically covering up its sensors and freezing these things in place, because they had already done that on their own really in other ways. So they would freeze them in place in some place where they were innocuous. This person says, So why would people rise up against the machines?

Well, as Goldman Sacks explained a little over a year ago and a headline, AI will lead to three hundred million layoffs in the US and Europe. Well, I think it's about that. I think it's about the lockdowns, immobilization, the mandates you will have this, you'll not be allowed to

have that, universal basic income, and all the rest of this. Bloomberg thinks that, you know when he insulted the farmers and insulted the factory workers and said, now, the smart ones of us in this revolution are figuring out how to take everybody's jobs, and we just got to figure out how we're going to pacify them with universal basic income so they don't come after us with the guillotines. I'm looking at these pictures here and I'm thinking they may

become an after they may becoming after him with the guillotines. Nevertheless, maybe that's why I think has done an upgrade of a half a million dollars to the security system. And then you have this At the center of it all are the massive fraud, the massive lies that masquerade as science. On BBC Politics, you had a guy holding fourth quarter. They were asking him about the flooding in Dubai. Well, you know who knows why it's flooding?

In Dubai. We have different weather all the time. But of course, as I point out, they've got a very aggressive JEO engineering program. They're cloud seating to make it rain. I don't know if it had anything to do with that, but certainly they are working on trying to modify the environment. But he has this smug answer and he says, well, it's called science. Yeah, so it just this is climate change. The rain that is happening in Dubai, it comes from something called science. And this guy

took him to task on this. This guy is not a scientist as a matter of fact, he said. The issue is his confusion and others confusion over what scientific modeling is and what it can do. And see this is a part of the mcguffin. You know, they use the same tactics of lies lie to us about the models about the pandemic, about COVID and the models about climate. He says. My own doctoral research was on infrared absorption

and fragmentation of gaseous molecules using lasers. The aim was to quantify how the process is dependent on the laser's physical properties. Then I modeled my results. This was to see if the theory correctly predicted how my measurements changed as one varied the laser pulse. Computed values were compared under different conditions with those that

were observed. And this is the way meteorology always worked. I talked about when I went to the meteorology convention and how you had literally hundreds of people there, all of them had a computer model, none of them were exactly accurate, and in every one of these presentations they would tell you, well, here's what we were measuring, and here's what our predictions said, and

here's what actually happened. Because they could do that with the weather, they could predicted a couple of days in advance and then look and see, you know, if that is really what happened. And of course that's not what is happening with a pandemic, is not what happens with the climate change stuff. He says, my points on the modeling of variations applies to the work done by Neil Ferguson at the Imperial College on the catastrophic COVID fatalities. He

said, it turns out that Ferguson wasn't a medical doctor at all. He was a mathematician and a theoretical physicist and he had a track record where he presented predictions that were what the interested parties wanted to do. And maybe that's why he missed that whole thing about Far's law. He wasn't an epidemiologist,

he wasn't a medical person. He wasn't actually very good in terms of being a mathematician either, because, as the Universe of Edinburgh pointed out, every time they ran his simulation, even with the same input, they got a different answer. But that's the kind of lies and idiocracy that have gotten us to this point. Thank you for joining us. Have a good day. Let me tell you the David Night Show you can listen to with your ears.

You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else, You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.