Wed 22May24 Ode to Klaus Schwab, AI Companies' (Nuclear) Power Trip, Microsoft CoPilot

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show. As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Wednesday, the twenty second of May You Have Our Lord twenty twenty four. Yeah, things are moving on pretty fast, and they're moving on pretty fast for a Cloud Schwab as well. Now eighty six, the Bond villain is going to step down, will be sadly missed as a cartoon character, because the agenda that he began will live on. This is not the work of one man, and so we're going to

take a look at the man his legacy. But we have a deep bench of satanic villains that is from We will move on from Claude Schwab and look at the others that are out there. We'll take a quick look at lawfair that is happening as even Oliver Stone even mentioned it. You know he's not a Trump fan, but he says, hey, this is what is happening

to Trump is real lawfair. But it's not just about Trump. Take a look at what the Biden administration is doing, not only criminal charges and years and years for very elderly people, but also civil forfeiture, not civil forfeiture, but civil lawsuits against a lot of pro life organizations, and we'll take a look at some new AI technology they think you're going to be stupid enough to buy at Microsoft Death. Yeah, the report is that klash Swap is

going to step down as the World Economic Form Executive Chairman. The guy who was the greatest gift to comedy, and I say that without a he g. I f he was a cartoon character straight out of the Bond villain casting. And evidently he thinks that he isn't going to make the window of the singularity where these people like Jubil Harari and Rakers while believe that they're going to transfer their essence into a robot and lift forever. Evidently he doesn't think that's

the case because he is beginning to step down. This proverb says, don't envy the rich or crave their company. That's one translation, of course, King James version says don't desire to be with them. You know, we could translate you know, don't don't envy the rich or crave their corporate No, it's not that kind of company. It's desiring to be with them. And of course we have seen how many world leaders desire to be with Klaus Schwab, haven't we Well, let's see, there was Brian Kemp out of

Georgia. We don't trust him doing Glenn Younkin out of Virginia. We don't trust him. He's there with klau Schwap. We got a young World Economic Forum leaders. We don't trust them, right I, Patrick McCain, Telsey Gabbard. But you know, Donald Trump was there and it was just fine. It was just fine, and it meant absolutely nothing that he was there just before he rolled out this global as plan. He was on the same page as everybody else where. Did you get the instructions for doing that?

You know, is it his people on the inside or what was the deal with that? It was fine for Trump all the rest of these people. Boy's a sign of being a trader to desire to be in the company of Klaus Schwab. Well, they're all sitting on the bar, aren't they. They're all sitting on the board of that company. Schwab has not officially named a successor maybe he's holding out. You know, just the last minute,

Elon Musk is going to get this thing figured out. Transhumanism Singularity is going to pop in and save it. Maybe he can freeze his brain or something, you know, brain freeze. It's a lot of ice cream anyway. The political website reported that Politico, according to twenty nine w insiders, that

Schwab is treating the organization like a family heirloom. We don't have any political leaders that would do anything like that, do he nepotism, indicating that Schwab may have sought to appoint one of his two children, Nicole and Olivier, both of whom already serve in high ranking positions, he might appoint them as an next executive. Mum's the word right now. But you know, when we look at this and we look at his legacy in the fact that he's

he's not going to go to jail. Known these people who locked us down or did any of this stuff or came up with this global conspiracy to starve and enslave us, Now of them are going to answer in this lifetime because they're all hanging together. Had murder on the Warp Speed Express, just like the murder on the Orient Express. Everybody did it, Everybody had a hand in it. Nobody's going to come after any of these other people who because

they're all complicit But why do the wicked prosper right? We always ask that. Well, the Bible says, don't be amazed when a man grows rich, because when he dies, he will take nothing away with him, of course, and he will stand before God. Schwab started the World Economic Forum in nineteen seventy one with only six thousand dollars in startup funds. Now it is a three hundred and ninety million dollars per year business. Isn't that interesting?

Taylor Swift makes more money, does less damage. Actually, maybe hers is more subtle, the damage that she does with the subsequent generations. And so you've got the world leaders who go to Davos every year in their private jets, as we've always talked about. And yet they're all in the same boat, aren't they. As Breitbart points out, because they won't tell you the truth. They won't tell you the truth. Even today, four years

later, Breitbart is still calling it the China virus. Can you believe that the chinavirus didn't like you down? Trump did. The chinavirus didn't inject you a poison Trump did and Biden did. Okay, the chinavirus didn't mask you up. It was a government at every level that was doing it, except in some local jurisdictions during the Chinese coronavirus, says Breitbar, because they won't tell you the truth. The Schwab controversially declared that it represented an opportunity to

enact his notion of a great reset. That's what it was all about. Yeah, and this is not just Klaus Schwab. This is a global agenda that is much bigger than Klaus Schwab. It's just that he was the guy that was kind of the executive branch. And you know, the Congress really is is kind of the UN. They're the ones who they don't have the power to allocate money. That's where it gets a little bit different. It's Klaus is bringing in these super rich tech billionaires and others who are going to

fund these schemes, so the schemes are hatched in the UN. Klaus didn't create the UN twenty thirty agenda. Who just popularized it and started raising money for it and started bringing in the private businessman, you know, to allocate who's going to give what. But they do that at Bilderberg is well and all that stuff will continue. There's no person at Builderberg he's the one who's

running it. I mean, he had annual attendees like Henry Kissinger. Now you've got the people like David Petraeus and Alex Karp who are there every year. But Klaus Schwab is just another one of these globalist organizations that seek to rule the world a bunch of Nazis, literal Nazis. In his case, Schwab controversially declared that this is an opportunity to enact the Great Reset. And

of course he didn't do it, did he. It was done by people like Trump and Trudeau and Macron and Bojo, and they were the ones who did it, marching to the UN agenda, the Builderberg Agenda, the World Economic Forum agenda. Key to his notion of a great reset is the implementation of the socialist adjacent stakeholder capitalism. Well it is. It is not capitalism. It is crony capitalism. It's not even really socialism. It's really more

fascism. It's a merger of government and economic and companies. Right, So it's crony capitalism, it's economic fascism. It's a lot of things, but it's not really socialist. But he's the one who termed who coined that term? Isn't that interesting? I think? Uh. They produced a video saying you'll own nothing and be happy. Of course we all know that. Everybody got so upset about it they started taking it down everywhere. And he also

likes to talk about the fourth the false Industrial Revolution. It's hard to tell if he's saying it's fourth as in order or if it's forced. Of course, it doesn't really matter with these Nazis, does it. It's fast in the revolution. It is the fourth fourth turning of the United States that we are in the midst of right now. That's what makes it so dangerous.

And it's not going to be an industrial revolution. It's going to replace the industrial revolution with an information revolution, a censorship revolution, a manipulation of all of that stuff. The World Economic Chairman has pointed to AI as central to his vision, saying, yeah, because it gives their eyes into everything that you're doing. We'll talk about what Microsoft has proposed. We're talking about Big Brother in a box. They want to sell you one thousand dollars laptop that's

constantly taking screenshots and analyzing them about everything that you're doing. Who in their right mind whatever accept that let alone pay for that. It's beyond me. But there will be a lot of zombies. As the NSA said, I said about the smartphone, who would have thought in nineteen eighty four, And they show the Super Bowl commercial of the Mac that this would be a big

brother. And they show Steve Jobs holding up the iPhone and they show people lined up at this door, and that the zombies would line up to pay for it. Well, you know, the Microsoft laptops are really pretty old technology, so maybe people won't line up to pay for it. And it is you know, this is supposed to be the cherry on top that revives the laptop. I don't think so, we'll see. The world economic is kind of like the iPhone thing the a Vision pro From the very beginning of

this, it's like, way too expensive. B you look like Percy Dove Consoles or ni Kovac's character from the nineteen fifties when you put that thing on to project your eyes out there about about three inches away from your face. And I don't know anyway, this may be the same sort of thing for Microsoft. It'd be fun to watch these guys crash and burn. He said

last year. Those who controlled AI will have the ability to become ze mastless A z eveld Right, the World Economic Forum founder, has pointed to communist China as a likely role model. That's his term role model for many countries and the systemic transformation of zevit. He said, right, of course,

they all love it. That's why, going back to Henry Kissinger, mister Bilderberg, that's why they have always given China the pre eminence, you know, trying to respond and they said, well, we've got too many people. Because the initial thing about this is the depopulation, right, so we're going to make an example of China. China will shut down their population. Oh they did, Now can they pull it back? Yeah. It's like a pilot putting the plane into a dive bomb and can you pull this thing

out? So yeah, just another validation estate that's a plane. Another plane dropped. Six thousand, eight thirty people injured. One guy died. He had a heart attack, seventy three years old. I'm surprised more people didn't have a heart attack, especially since we've got so many people are vaccinated. You're on a plane's going straight down anyway, another validation of my decision not to fly anywhere. Yeah, I had Bradley Dean who is as a radio

program and I've had no on here. I've done some guest hosting for him because he does a lot of external events and stuff. He called me the other day and he said, do you do any Do you do any events? And I said, nope, no travel. So there you go. That's a dropped six thousand feet trying to take off and the engine is on fire. I mean, these are just things that have happened in the last

couple of days. I haven't really talked about. World Economic Forum has pointed to communist China as a likely role model, and they have given everything to China. China can build all of the factories that they wish without anybody bothering them about emissions or even about trying to clean it up. You know, just build a bunch of them, because we're going to transfer all of the manufacturing to China and to India and away from the United States and Europe and

everything, which is what is happening. There's no question about that. And it's of course China has responded with these Dragonian policies of one child policy, pulled back from that, but of course they were the ones who set up the social credit system, which is central to all this, the traffic light system red, yellow and green about whether or not you're a good citizen. You do what they tell you. When they tell you, you ask them how high do you want me to jump? How many boosters do you want

me to take? The Chinese model is certainly a very attractive model for quite a number of countries, and of course we've seen this over and over again. We had to Trudeau saying, ah, you know, what country do you like the best? And don't say Canada. We know you're going to say Canada, But what country other than Canada? And Trudeau says, well, I like China because they can tell people do whatever they want for climate change. And we had George W. Bush say the same thing as well,

Yeah, I wis I was a dictator like China. I could just tell people what to do. They all crave that power. Well, bablin Bee, I think had one of the more interesting takes on Klaus Schwamp. They have a picture of him in his space suit thing. You know, I don't maybe some of you know, if you know, put it in

the in the chat and I've Travis scan for it. But I don't know what he was doing when he trussed, like a space alien or a spaceman or something, or that that suit that he had, right, Was this some kind of a cosplay event that Davos that I missed on on this, like a Jeffrey Epstein costume party or something. What was the deal? Why was he wearing that costume that you see in pictured in all the time?

I think they might even have it on the bright Art article. They might have put up that picture of him, you know, the bald the bald guy, the Bond villain with the weirdo costume. But bablin Bee says that he's decided to step down so he can spend more time. Yeah, there it is right there. Yeah, that will be had it. He decided to step down so you can spend more time with lizard family on It's on Planet Ark seventh. There you go. Well, as a special tribute to

Klaus Schwab, we we will give you. We will give you some of his greatest hits. We'll be right back and you can walk five hand steps, but not as sing that you say. I have more honey tails and a few agniphates and all about cops spent at your door. New World Order in music one, two, three, four five, also unvaccinated us still live. A little bit of Fizer in my eyes, a little bit of biotech. It does not hand a little Johnson. Johnson does a three.

A little mister Sandy Castle, you don't get sick. It's just a number five. Just a small town boy drinking genetically more that fights all boy sis in Shusey doesn't co clee. Please stop believe not the breading. If we are almost niney young people, please stop believe fried. Now here's a little song I old. You might want to hear it in your part. You know nothing and be happy. I don't know and got no car, not two empty four booster shots in your own nothing to be happy. You can't

even buy it in the store because of your lone social credit score. Own nothing, Be happy, You will own nothing and be happy. Be happy, and eat some bugs. I'm a secular progressive activist. Last year I recovered the remains of these five babies from an all term abortion center in Washington, DC. These are the phases of a genocide supported by Joe Biden and my own Democratic Party. We can provide for the working class and resist this

extremism. I am challenging you to never v for a pro choice democrat again. I'm Theresa, a Covinac, pro life democrat running for president of the United States, and I approved this message. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Yet Laos, your annual Global Risk Report makes for a stunning and sobering read for the global business community. The top concern for the next two years does not conflict or climate. It is disinformation and misinformation for not closely by polarization

within our societies. In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a re evolutionary act. You are listening to the David Knight Show, all right, and those great clips there from Snickers you can find them on YouTube, and they did a lot of great work there. And then of course this

is a live show, and I hit the wrong button. But I thought, well, you know, he does kind of fit in with the depopulation agenda, and you want to see what depopulation looks like, chopped up bodies from babies to euthanasia, right, I mean, it really does fit. These people want to kill everybody, that's the bottom line with the agenda. So I just left the you know, after I hit the wrong button. I just let that commercial run. Microsoft unveils a creepy AI powered window the

Windows that tracks everything that you do. They call it co Pilot AI Enhanced Windows PC. Isn't this interesting, you know, because I'm not a fan of Windows. Have a Windows computer now to do the music stuff. Because I had my son put it together. Apple to have the capability was going to be so incredibly expensive, and he said, I can put together one,

and he did. He put together a really fast system. We saved by not having a GPU processor on it, but we optimized the We optimized the memory access by using the SSDs things like that I'll state memory drives and things like that. So and added a lot of memory for it because that's really what it needs. And but I just hate using the Windows operating system. This thing is forty plus years old, right, and they still can't

do a file search. You're type in something to alta search for a files I think, think thank you when you get when you're in the macusin as you're typing the stuff, it's giving you options. I was ridicul that they still can't do a foss sarch. Now these people want to tell you that this new copilot AI assistant is going to take constant screenshots of reactivity to track

your every move and create a history to go back through. Well, maybe this thing can search, because they've never been able to do that in forty years. It's ridiculous. One of the simplest things on a computer, one of the central tasks that you would do on a computer. Of course, I have been able to make them secure either, perhaps senders by design. I always suspected it was. Microsoft CEO Satya Nodella introduced the new class of

AI embued personal computers. As I said before, they're hoping they can breathe new life into these, emphasizing their potential to anticipate users' needs and intentions. This is something else that I hate, the profiling of favor or. I was listening to the presentation about a piece of music software, the instruments that they had, and you know, not the other stuff where you just type in on a you know, to the AI, you describe the style of

music you want and you just let it go do his thing. It's different what I do. I'm looking for essentially realistic samples of instruments that I can play. This is a really old tactic that goes back to Stevie Wonder Songs and the Key of Life right where they sampled natural animals and it hit different keys on the keyboard and a play digitized samples. That was pretty crude at the time. I mean pretty advanced at the time, but really crude to

look at it today. That's essentially what this stuff is. Some of them are better than others. So I'm watching this and after the show, I'm pretty tired. I fell asleep, and the next thing I know, I wake up in the middle of this hour long video by this heretical theologian nt Right that I absolutely despise everything that he says, but he's there pontificating about how, you know, his idea of what the Bible really should say and everything, And so I stop it. And now on YouTube I get nothing

but int Right videos. I'm showing Careen the other day, I said, look at this, it's putting his video. There's you know, every screen that I've got has got two or three videos of nt Right, and it's like, how do we stop this? The same thing happened with Netflix. We discontinued it way back when they had DVDs and part of it was that they were pushing stuff on you. Part of it was they kept recommending things that I had seen before, things that I told it I didn't want to

see. And then they started recommending stuff to me. Even after I said, don't show me this again, they would still push it on me. I hate having stuff pushed on me. With computers, I hate having updates pushed on me. You know what Apple has done is they constantly nag you to do an update, but they don't force you to do it. And I hate doing updates because it always breaks things, and especially if they do it after a couple of years. They they point out they don't support older

computers. All my computers are more than five years old. So you know, I don't want to update to something that you haven't tested it on or even pretended to test it on. Got the same logic as the mRNA shot, So don't mRNA my computer. Bro. It's uh, which is what these automatic updates are. But they are going to anticipate your needs. They will decide what you need. It's like they'll decide what you want to watch

on YouTube or Netflix or whatever, and what your intentions are. We're entering this new era E R R O R where computer is not only understand and us, but can actually anticipate what we want and our intent. And by the way, we've got a guest coming up in the third hour. We're going to talk to him about AI. He's he's written a book on it. And you know, we need to debunk this, this whole mythology surrounding artificial intelligence, and a lot of this is being pushed for financial reasons.

Folks. Look at the stock market, most of it has been based around hopium, centered around AI. So these people are pushing it just like they pushed the the MR and A shots on us because they can make money from it. Anyway. Copilot will have a photographic memory, and they mean that literally literally taking phogress of everything that you do constantly of a user's activity. Microsoft claims that it's privacy. These settings will be protected by allowing them to

filter out unwanted tracking and keeping the tracking data on the device itself. If you believe that I've got a bridge in Brooklyn, Seriously, do you really think anybody wants this? Do you think anybody believes there's claims that your stuff is not going to be sold? They will sell you out to commercial interest. They will sell you out to the CIA in the NSA. This is

why they're doing all of this stuff. Here is the presentation, and I think even the person who was interviewing them was skeptical or maybe if there was a Microsoft thing. They put out the objections so that he can assuage people of their fears that they're being sold out in spine on which you are. How do we introduce memory, right, photographic memory into what you do on

the PC? And now we have it, so it's called recall. It's not keyword search, right, it's semantic search because I would take forever his street and it's not just about any document. We can recreate moments from the past. Essentially. Here's how it works. Windows constantly take screenshots of what's on your screen, then uses a generative AI model right on the device along with the NPU to process all that data and make it searchable, even photos.

I got to try it out. I searched brown leather bag. It came up in visual search. There's no place on this page that it says brown leather bag. It just knows because it sees this brown leather bag. There could be this reaction from some people that this is pretty creepy. Microsoft is taking screenshots of everything I do. Yeah, I mean that's why that it can only do it on the edge. Right. See, this is you know, you have to put two things together. This is my computer,

this is my recall, and it's all being done locally. Yeah, well you don't really care about my computer? Do you force updates on me? And we talk about search things? Of course, is not a keyword search because we still can't do that after forty years. I use this. The only thing that I try to do with Microsoft is to boot it up and then to go into my program where I live all the time. Anything else, it's like, stay away from this thing. I try to do

it all on the Mac. But anyway, it goes beyond that. And I think we have an interesting juncture here with AI because and of course this brings up a question with AI. You know, is it how much is that going to cut down the life of your battery? Well, this thing is constantly taking photographs, constantly thinking and predicting what you want and all the

rest of the stuff. It may not be as bad as their data centers where they're scraping the internet constantly and building their large language models by using everybody's copyrighted stuff without paying them anything. But it's a big issue, and they are so concerned about it that Sam Altman is now creating a company to do nuclear power to run his massive processing centers. And remember I talked about this

for the longest time. When we go back to March of twenty twenty two and Biden does an all of government program to push CBDC, and it breaks it down everybody in government, all of the deep swamp, which is all under the executive branch, you know, like the thing that Trump is over as president. The entire he was elected president, the executive branch contains all of the deep state. All of these agencies were under Trump and he did

nothing right anyway. But when you look at the the order that Biden put out of government order to all of these swamp creatures, it broke down into four different areas. First of all, let's completely redesign the financial system. Let's design the computer software that's going to operate the CBDC. Let's figure out how we're going to use the Department of Justice and the FBI and all this

other law enforcement to bludgeon people into submission to use this. And then the fourth one was let's talk about climate change and how cryptocurrency uses so much energy and it's got to be replaced with the CBDC that will use less energy because there's not any mining that's going on. You know, it's just we we don't have any proof of work, We don't do any work, so it uses less energy. We just tell you we're going to create some new money, and we can do that because of who we are, the old FIAT

system digitized. And so they realize that they need to take down crypto. They're going to do it on the basis that it uses too much energy. And I said at the time, well, how much energy do their data

centers use? You know, like the NSA's bluffed dell Utah center that uses more power, more water than a city, and it does it out in the middle of the desert where they don't have any water, or all these other centers where they are storing everything waiting for the day that they can have quantum computing or fast enough computers that they can go out and data mine everything that all of us have ever done on the internet. You know, you

think that the Internet is disappearing. It's not it's going into the black hole of the NSA for sure forever. They said, I forget what that. I don't have the article here in front of me. But something like a third of Internet has disappeared. More than that for me, you know, they memory hold all almost all the stuff that I've done in the past, you can't find any of it anywhere. YouTube by itself, I mean I had lots of video with several million views just disappeared. They don't exist anymore,

and so many things are being memory hold. You think of the Internet as fresh fruit, but in reality, everything in our life is right. People think they have permanence because there's a statue or monument to them. No, no, it'll burn, it'll fall down, it'll be in ruins someday. There's nothing that anybody does that can't be defaced or lied about or destroyed, and so it's no great loss. Really, you know, there were these types of records were never around before. So yeah, it's it's disappearing,

except that it's not. In the NSA. They're paying a lot of money to keep everything recorded, and so you know, shut up about that hypocrisy and then shut up about artificial intelligence. I said, so you're going to focus on cryptocurrency, data, energy usage, but you're not going to say anything about your surveillance state and a massive amount of energy that it's using

to store and to data mind everything in the world. Or artificial intelligence, it does the same thing, right, scans everything in the world and stores it and so forth. Well, these companies that are pushing artificial intelligence, they know three things. First of all, they know that our government and all the you know, the United States and the European governments are working very hard to shut down our energy grid, right, they want to shut down

the electrical grid, So they know that. They also know that their carbon footprint collectively probably howstrips most states in term most governments, most nation states, and it's absolutely incredibly large, and it's going to get even larger. And so they know that they know that the grid is being shut down, and

so they know that they also know that their carbon footprint doesn't matter. But they're going to not be able to have this even though they're given a pass, you know, just like we give a pass to China, we give a pass to Bill Gates, or we give a pass to Taylor Swift of course they would give a pass to their buddies artificial intelligence, but they've got to be able to find that energy somewhere. The third thing is, like every energy industry, they need to have power. And yet we can't have

an industry that makes steel or makes cars. We can't have the power to grow food. But we will have the power for the artificial intelligence surveillance state, won't we They will make sure of it. And which would you rather have? Well, that doesn't matter. What does the government want you to have. Does it want you to have cars and food and steel and things like that, or does it want you to have complete surveillance of everything that

you do forever. Oh, that's what they want. So that's what they're going to have. So how did they do that? Well, they're starting to move into creating their own nuclear power industry because the government's not going to do it. You see, they don't tell you they got to shut everything down because of emissions. Well, the nuclear power doesn't have any emissions, not of CO two. It has nuclear emissions that you can't see. But

they're not concerned about safety for anybody. They're not concerned about what do we do in the nuclear waste for a thousand years, do we figure out how to treat this stuff. Now, we'll just store it and literally kick the biohazard can down the road. They're not going to worry about that. So this new company is being listed on the New York Stock Exchange by Sam Altman.

It will design and deploy advanced fission power plants to provide the clean and affordable energy needed to power the flood of data centers that are popping up around the nation as part of the AI revolution. Because Biden is killing the grid, they've got to create their own grid, and they'll be allowed to because they are favored stakeholders. You know what, if you know the steel companies wanted to set up their own nuclear power plant, do you think they'd be

allowed to. Jennifer Granholm would shut them down in a heartbeat. The company's mission is to provide quote, clean, reliable, affordable energy on a global scale. They do it everywhere, and they'll be given a pass everywhere, just like China, India on a global scale through the design deployment of next generation fast reactor technology. And of course this will further entrench their power.

And we're in the middle. You want to talk about wars. You know, we talked about fourth turning we've had in America, the Revolutionary War. There's a fourth turning. We had the Civil War that was a fourth turning, Great Depression, World War two? Do you know that we're of course, everybody likes to talk about the Ukrainian War, the Israeli Middle East wars and stuff like that. But there's another war out there, the art elect

war. The Hugo de Garis talked about and I interviewed him several times because I think that's the real war that is going on that nobody sees, nobody talks about. In his book, there were two components to it. One is should we continue on with artificial intelligence, because as a secular materialist, he believed that if they could accurately reproduce the human brain, that it would

just spring, This artificial synthetic thing would just spring to life. Well I never believed that, but he said, when people realize what the agenda is with artificial intelligence and robotics, how they want to take everything from us. He said this long before Klaus was bragging about you'll own nothing and be happy. He said, when people find out that the plan is to make sure they own nothing, and you know they're going to be shut down. They're

not going to be happy. They're going to come after the global elite and they will fight back. And he called it the art elect war, artificial intelligence war, and that's what I think it'll be. I think it'll be an AI war. And I think these people are setting up their own power, independent power grid and everything else. And of course as the government sets down, it shuts down the power grid for you and I, so we

can't have cars, we can't have food, we can't have manufacturing. They will make sure they've got their own separate power system that only they are allowed to use. And now you can see that the global governance of these AI overlords are setting up their own power system and they will be allowed to do it. I'm sure Jennifer Grenholm will be just fine with anything they decide to do, just like the FDA is fined with anything that fives are MODERNA a

big farmer want to do zero h said. Last month, we warned that the shortage of power is delaying new data centers by two to six years, and it's also driving big tech companies into the energy business. And of course this is a manufactured shortage. Isn't that interesting that the only thing that are the only manufacturing that the government of America and UK Europe are the only manufacturing that they're interested in is manufacturing shortages, shortages of energy, shortages of every

manufactured good power. Amazon recently struck a six hundred and fifty million dollar deal to buy a data center in Pennsylvania powered by an on site two point five gigawatt nuclear power plant jigawats Marty. Yeah. Uh so, let's just say this. You know, given what we've seen from AI and some of these other things, do you really trust them to run a nuclear power plant? Are they going to put the AI in charge of a nuclear power plant?

Is the AI going to hallucinate and pull out all the rods or something? I mean, are they going to be hallucinating over pictures of black seventeenth century Scottish Highlanders while the alarms are going off? And I mean this is this is Google. We're talking about Google and Microsoft. Do you really trust these guys with something critical like nuclear power? To me, I think they're going to be like Sam Britton, you know, who is was put by the

Biden administration in charge of nuclear waste. But you know, of course he's too busy deciding what his fashion accessories are going to be tonight and doing as eyeliner that he I really have serious doubts as to whether ornight he could do a job like that. Not a serious person, not focused, I think, or focused on the wrong thing. The company's mission is to provide clean, reliable, affordable energy. They say, well, do you really trust

that. Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Peter Thiel, Who's who are the AI revolution nuclear fusion startups? All of them are gaining traction. Sam Altman, who started this back in twenty fifteen, he's just the reason this is making news now nine years later is because his plan is being put out publicly on the New York Stock Exchange. Company is Oaklow. He believes that Oaklow is best position to commercialize advanced vision energy solutions. But it's going to be

power for the and not for me. Last month we published a lengthy report discussing why says zero hedge even as the AI trade may be fizzling. In other words, they're saying, you know, the darling of the stock market has been AI, and while that may be fizzling, They said, the electrification Trade also known as power Up America, that is so urgently needed to run those electricity gobbling data centers that are needed to run AI and the surveillance

state of the NSA and all these other things. That is just getting started, they said, and has in fact outperformed substantially both the broader AI and data center equipment baskets over the past two months. Well, we'll see about that. What's that What they're saying is is that you know that the government has manufactured something. Finally, all these people say government doesn't make anything. They make shortages, they make inflation, they make all kinds of things.

You just don't want them. They make wars. Right, government makes all kinds of things, bad things. You're a bad man. I want to wish you unto the cornfield. We're gonna take a quick break. We'll be right back. You're listening to the David Night Show. Well, let's talk a little bit about the law fair, the celebrity trial that is going on. Is I said, we don't have debates. We're not going to have

debates about issues. Instead, we're going to have reality TV shows. You know, about Biden's mental health, about Trump's debauched moral character and all the rest of the stuff. And now they've added something new into the mix. As the trials are getting very tired and worn, and the trial in New York of Trump for the Hooker hush fund money and how that was spent and reported, that is winding down. It's just waiting for the jury to come

back. One about the documents has been postponed until after the election. So they need to have something new. They need to have something that is melodramatic, and so they've got a movie that's going to be coming out, The Apprentice, And at the con Film Festival that was a lot of what they were talking about. You had Oliver Stone there, who is not a Trump supporter, but even he said this lawfair stuff that is happening. And I've said it myself, I'm not a Trump supporter, and I think that this

law fair stuff is a very bad precedent. It's very dangerous. And I said Donald Trump has given all indications that he's going to run with it as well, you know, in the same way that Trump who just got the endorsement of the NRA, because of course they want to be on a side that is possibly going to win and they want to be seen as winners. Right. I don't trust the NRA. I've never belonged to the NRA Gun Owners of America, and there's some other groups that are out there, are

genuine, and they'll fight over the principal. NRA will not fight over the principle. I've seen it over and over and over again. I won't go down the whole list of ways that they have betrayed us, but they have, you know, going back to even what Sheriff mac did in terms of the laws during the Clinton administration, took it all the Supreme Court and won fighting them, but the NRA signed on to all of that stuff. But getting back to what's happening with this law Fair. Oliverstone was at the con

Film Festival and he was actually gleeful about this Trump Apprentice movie. He really liked that he's there. He's doing, or has done, a movie on the Marxist corrupt dictator of Brazil Lula. I mean, come on, this guy is just unbelievably corrupt and of course of Marxist. I guess that's why Oliverstone likes him. But even Oliverstone said, this Lawfair is a very bad

idea. He says, it's being used to take down Trump, and we all see it, you know, we see the Trump derangement syndrome on the left, and we all see the Trump delusional, the strong delusion that has been sent to the Trump supporters on the right. But he said, these charges that Trump is fighting fighting are minor, and you know, he's not on trial for something like you know, mass murder of killing bunches of people with a poison that he pushed and continued to push it and anything like that.

Nothing about treason, you know, saying we'll take the guns and do the due process later. You know, stuff like that, setting a precedent of the bump stock and the pistol brace, which even the pistol brace as he shut it down, was picked up again by Biden. Of course, Biden picked up the precedent of gun control by executive order, but the NRA didn't have it a problem with that. And this precedent of lawfair that Biden is setting, I think that's going to be picked up by Trump, just

like Biden picked up Trump's gun control by executive order precedent. I think that Trump will pick up this lawfare he gives all indications. That's what this is really about. I'm going to get revenge. I'm going to do the lawfair to him if I get in. You see, the Democrats are Democrats, and Republicans Union Party are trying to push us into a civil war. Everybody sees the injustice of this. But there's so much personal attachment to these parties

and to these politicians, or personal revulsion about these politicians. I guess that it's not people are not attached to Biden, they're repulsed by Trump. Or you have people who absolutely love Trump and will excuse everything that he's done. And just like we saw with Dinisaster, who was an own pedophile before they even picked him to run for Congress and put him in before he became Speaker of the House, before he became the longest serving Speaker of the House,

and all the stuff surfaced about him being a pedophile. Statute of limitations had ended. They could have changed that, but they chose not to. The judge who sent Dinisaster to jail did it because of a supposed structuring of withdrawals, was asked questions about the money he was taking out to pay his blackmail, or years later after he retired, and they said, well, you

can't do that. Why not? Why is it any of their business when you take money out, It's not like you're even trying to avoid paying taxes. Why would they have that money has already been in the system, has been in the bank. Why would they care about that? They shouldn't care about that. But that's what they sent him to jail for. But when the judge sentenced him, he referenced the pedophilia because we all knew that was

what it was about. But they're not going to come after Trump for his mass murder, for his treason locking us down and declaring martial war law and war against us, just as the World Economic Forum wanted, as the un wanted, as the who wanted. That's why I call him Benedict Donald. They're not going to come after him for any of that stuff because all these

people who would put the charges against him are complicit Democrat and Republican. But Oliver Stone says, the charges on both sides of the Trump Biden election are pretty wild. That Biden is corrupt, he is, that Trump is corrupt, and he is. You know that both are, But he says it's a new form of warfare, and it's called lawfair and it's what they're using against Trump. He said. Trump's four trials, and some of these charges, he said, whether you're for him or against him, these charges are

minor. And again he's there promoting a film about the Brazilian Marxist president Lula. In the recent past, Stone has expressed regret for supporting President Biden. He said, I voted for him. I made a mistake. Why Because Biden is dragging the country into potential World War three with Russia. That's one of the things. Verse He's trying to destroy America with open borders. He's trying to destroy America with a dismantling the grid. He says, I see

a man Biden who maybe is not in charge of his own administration. He's not in charge of his own mind. Oliver, who knows if he's going to fall down somewhere. It seems that he's dragging us stupidly into a confrontation with a power that is not going to give That's the whole point. The two time Oscar winning filmmaker lashed out on Twitter in twenty twenty one over its

decision to ban Trump. He called the move shocking, while he also criticized the country's growing trend towards censorship, which is being carried out on social media companies at the behest of the Biden administration and with the passive complicity of the Trump administration. Folks, it was twenty eighteen that I got kicked off and Alex Jones got kicked off, and Info Wars got kicked off, and they did it openly. And then two months later, that was in August.

Two months later, just before the midterm elections, they kicked off eight hundred other sites that didn't get as much attention. These are sites that were against for the most some of them were for Trump, half of them were not for Trump. What they were all had in common was they were against the surveillance state and the police state and war. And they kicked off eight hundred of those sites two months after we got kicked off. So all this happened,

and Trump did nothing to defend our God given rights. You see, his duty is not just to avoid censoring us, but his duty is to defend our God given rights. That's a purpose of government. You know, according to our founding documents, we're endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights, and they list a few of them, and it is the duty of

the government to protect those rights. And when the government becomes destructive of those rights, then it is our right and duty to alter or to abolish that government. And we don't do it, do we. We're just as complicit in all of this stuff as Trump is. As a matter of fact, the two people who did all this stuff to us in the last four years, and the two front runners, and everybody's cheering for one of them to be president. We don't want to or alter or abolish the powers that they

used against us in this medical martial law and this treasonous shut down. No, we want these guys more of it. We're endorsing all of that by voting for Trump or Biden, which is why I will not vote for either one of them. I'm not voting for RFK Junior either. We're going to have the Constitution Party on the ballot here in Tennessee. But if I didn't have that option, I would just mark up the ballot when I go on to vote for local offices. That's the only reason I'm going to go.

There's not anybody in Tennessee I'm going to support either because They all voted to shut down the First Amendment because Israel demanded it. Every single one of these GP critters in Congress voted to shut down the First Amendment. In Tennessee, I'm not voting for a single one of them, but I will vote for the local people. So what about all this lawfair against Biden's political enemies, you know, like the pro lifers? Do we care about that? Now?

We only care about what he's doing to Trump, don't we? Do we care about what Biden is doing to the January six Ers? No, we don't. We only care about Trump, even though the January of the six Ers were there to support Trump. We don't care what happens to them. We don't care about the lawfair that's being done against Julian Asige, do we? Because that began in the Trump administration. That began with his CIA

Attorney General Bill Barr that he picked. I mean, he picks the worst people, and any other any other person would be held accountable by the voters for the people that they put in high office. Except for Trump. Oh is poor Trump. He's just misled. He just doesn't know. Well, you keep telling yourself that, You keep telling yourself that he's not taking orders that he's not taking money. Come on, grow up, get real. This is the real world. Learn something. Stop with the maga caps and

all the rest of this stuff. It's not making America gullible again. I'm so sick of this gullible crowd, the Maga crowd. So what about the lawfair that Biden is doing against cars? What about the lawfair that they're doing against the electric grid and the appliances in our own food? I mean, it's a combination of regulation with our representation and lawfair. Why don't we care about that? No, we care about these reality TV shows, and we

care about defending a known adulter or somebody who is addicted to sex. Donald Trump, Why do we care about that? Why do we care? To me, it's like defending Hunter Biden. You know, they just they just have different addictions. Quite frankly, Yeah, Sign committed no crime. Well he did it was he exposed the uniparty spooks, the people are really running the government. He exposed the real government. That's why they're trying to kill

him. That's why they've had him in jail all these years. And Trump was a part of that as well. Trump and Biden part of that. No, neither one of them will shut it down. Trump had the option to pardon Julian asonge Alex told us he's going to do it. He did it right up to the last day. Alex said he's going to do it tonight before midnight. But you know, Trump is all we care about. We have to lie and spend and pretend and have this or well in double

think about everything that Trump does. We don't apply the same rules to him because if we did, nobody'd be supporting him. But he got there because of all these trials. These trials have worked out to his advantage. He never had to debate anybody on any issues. He avoided all the debates, just talked about his reality TV show. Well, let's talk a little bit about the reality TV show. As I pointed out yesterday, I played the clip. I think it is really a funny clip, and I'm going to

play it again. This is the Anderson Cooper clip when he was talking about Cohen being caught on Friday, caught dead in a lie. And what is interesting about this is just watch the expression of Anderson Cooper. You know, he's sitting there and you know what he's saying. He's saying, I'm going to look like an idiot and a shill if I try to defend Michael Cohen

because he just exposed himself as a liar. But on the other hand, I know that my audience here on CNN, especially the Hollywood crowd, is just going to eviscerate me if I don't somehow say that this is how do I defend this? You know, how do I defend this liar? How do I try to pretend that there really is something here? Because that's what my CNN audience wants to hear. They want to hear that Trump's a bad man, and you know, and he needs to go to jail. We

need to wish him into the cornfield or the jail more specifically. And so what do I do? And you can see him and hear him stuttering as he's doing all this stuff. It's very much like I've seen Alex do this live on air. Well, I know Trump is killing people, but I'm going to tell him that it's yeah, it's uh, it's sugar water. Remember that video you know you're talking about that you can see him actually, yeah, that's what it is. It's like John Lovett who's did the liar?

You know, yeah, and then I died and then I came back and all this stuff, and then there's Morgan Fairchild. Yeah, my wife, Morgan Fairchild. You know, I've seen that was a joke decades ago, but now it really happens with people like Alex Jones and people like Anderson Cooper. Having just witnessed that piece of cross examination, do you have doubts that that conversation happened the way Michael Cohen testified on his direct examination that trump.

I think it's absolutely, absolutely. I think it's devastating. I mean for Michael Cohen's credibility on I mean, in this one particular topic, whether it's you know, he just didn't, I mean, it's it's hard to

I don't know. Yes, I think if I was a juror case watching that, I would think this guy's making this up as he's going along, right, or he's making this particular story up, this particular story pointing out you were testifying just on Tuesday in this court, you know, and all morning along he's been pointing out, you know, inconsistencies in Michael Cones's testimony, or at least questionable aspects of Michael Conees's testimony, but nothing that you

would necessarily as a juror think, Okay, that's clearly a lie. Maybe that's a miss he was misunderstanding, or you know, he was bragging or whatever. This one, Todd Blam's clearly saved this to write before the lunch break. I'm assuming because it was just so well crafted and just point by point walking through this story which at first seemed you know, why why this

seems like a ridiculous story. It's some fortunate year old at sending him, you know, nasty text messages and he's going to call it Keith Schiller about it. And then you realize you look at that he showed the phone logs that the prosecutor had shown, and it's the phone call that that that that that Michael Cohen at previously talked about. I think it is severely damaging to Michael Cones's testimony. Yeah, well, you know, he had a lot

of people who are saying I even saw some of the comments. I said, Michael con is not going to be the last witness for the prosecution. He's just not credible. You always want to put your strongest witness there at the end. And of course this this hack district attorney doesn't know what he's doing. There's no crime here, there's no credibility with this guy. And then you know, this week it blew up, as you know, Trump

finally has a good lawyer. And this lawyer who walked Cohen through and got him to admit to being a liar, also got him to walk through this and admit to being a thief. The judge was absolutely furious, and he took it out on one of these defense witnesses who came in who had been a lawyer for Michael Cohen, and he doubled down on the fact that Cohen was also stealing or was also lying. But then he also talked and pointed out how Cohen was actually stealing, not just a liar, but also a

thief. The judge was really angry with this lawyer, Robert Costello, and he he kept sustaining one after the other, everything that he said, objection, it's a thing, objections a thing. You know, shut up this guy, and he said, stop giving me this side eye. Don't side eye me, you know, don't roll your eyes at me. And I was gonna say he was very He called him contemptuous. He cleared the court.

You know, approached the evnch let's talk about all this stuff. But there's only so much that this corrupt judge can do with this non crime here. And so when he scolds this witness who was also a lawyer, Costello called him contemptuous. Okay, cleared the courtroom. Judge Merchant first excuse jurors to warn Costello about not exclaiming, not saying geez, or rolling his eyes or giving him the side. Don't you give me the sign? Are you staring me down right now? He said to him, I know, I'm

just wondering how, and then he cut him off. Cleared the courtroom. At the courtroom is clear to reporters and spectators. The judge confronted Costello, I'm putting you on notice that your conduct is contemptuous. If you try to stare me down one more time, I will remove you from the stand and I will strike this entire testimony. Do you understand me. He would have loved to strike all that testimony because it was very incriminating to the Trump Costello

was very important. Goodness because he talked about how again, Cohen said, I don't have any evidence against my former boss. He said, I swear, Bob, I don't have anything on Trump. And so previously he had testified that Trump knew that he was reimbursing Cohen for the payments to Daniels and

so forth to avoid negative publicity. But then came the theft aspect. Coen has paid four to twenty thousand dollars in general, one hundred and thirty thousand two Stormy Daniels fifty thousand that he claimed was owed for campaign related tech services from a company called Redfinch. Now Redfinch was the tech company that the Trump campaign was paying to rig the Drudge Report, poll online and some other things

of that nature. So, yeah, the dirty stuff. But anyway, then he bumps that up and then he doubles everything, and then he puts in a sixty thousand dollars bonus. And so Todd Blanche says, you stole from the Trump organization. Coin said, yes, sir. Well, Blanche then suggested that Cohen stole sixty thousand dollars, not just thirty thousand, because the reimbursement payment was doubled. Coin said, yes, sir. Did you ever have to plead guilty to larceny? He said, no, sir.

And so you've got people on CNN, Ellie Hunnig who said that Cohen stealing from Trump is a more serious crime than falsifying business records, and you know, so is murdering millions of people, and you know, suspending the Constitution with an executive warder and all the rest of his stuff, and boasting lying about what you just did. But those are all serious things. Selling out the constitution of the World Health Organization, the World Economic Form, those are

really serious. But of course he's covered with all of that, just as I said earlier. But yeah, this is a non crime brought by these prosecutors who want to be in the spotlight. It is there just to remind people what a low life, sex addicted thug Trump is, and all that is true, but the actual crimes are not there. But you know,

the lawfair is a hallmark of Biden. It's not just against Trump. We have pro life organizations and individuals who are various individuals who violated this so called Face Act, which in itself is a I think a violation of the Constitution

should be shut down. It's never been enforced until Biden decided that he's going to enforce it that he's going to send elderly people to jail for life because they tried to talk about life to people who are about to kill their baby, and because to their credit, they were able to get some people to walk out and not have the abortion they went in. They gave them alternatives

to abortion, and these people walked down. And I think that's why you have These people who did it are just fine with whatever is thrown at them. They don't want to go through the suffering, but in the bigger scheme of things, they understand and they have no regrets, unrepentant about what they did because they know they saved some babies' lives those days. But my administration is going to use lawfair. The Department of Justice, besides sending these people

to jail and criminal charges, has now instituted lawsuits against the organizations. So send the individuals to jail, and now lawsuits to shut down and kill the organizations, and also law suits against seven people. The two pro life organizations are Citizens for Pro Life's Society and the Red Rose Rescue. At least two couples at the Planned Parenthood facility left after speaking to Handy, who's going to be getting years in jail and Miller, which Miller described as quote a very

good sign that gives us hope. The other group, the Red Rose Rescue, they have pro lifers who enter an abortion facility and hand the pregnant mothers Red Roses with cards that offer them options other than abortion. It says on it, you were made to love and to be loved. Your goodness is greater than the difficulties of your situation, circumstances in life. Change a new

life. However, however, tiny brings the promise of unrepeatable joy. And some of them took that card and walked out, did not kill their baby. And I would these people who did that would say it's worth it. I would have said it's worth it to go to jail for that. Those participating in the Red Rose Rescues, No, they faced the possibility of arrest. They refused to leave the clinic should they be ordered to do so by law enforcement. Instead, they will peacefully resist by kneeling or lying down on

the ground. And it's just this organizam and they want fifty thousand dollars in lawsuit against these different ones. It's not just them, it's David de Leiden, who if you remember, it was La La Harris who was the Attorney general in California when they exposed the murder for hire and trafficking and baby body

parts. It was La La Harris who prosecuted them. And then if she got promoted to Senate, her job as prosecutor was taken over as attorney general was taken over by Javier Bicera, and he continued acution against David Deliden in the Center for Medical Progress, and then she became vice president and Javierbasara got became head of HHS, which is very appropriate because it was HHS, specifically

the NIH that were the customers. And isn't it interesting that we would not have known that it was the government that was the biggest customer of this murder for hire baby body part thing unless David de Leiden had been persecuted persecuted by Lala Harris and Javier Bessara. God works in mysterious ways, doesn't he. Sometimes it's very difficult for what we go through, But God has his purposes, and so yeah, criminal and civil law fair against these people by the

Biden administration. And when we look at what has happened in Oklahoma, for example immigration. We've seen the so called Department of Justice under Biden use all kinds of law fair against Texas when they tried to protect the border when they try to arrest criminals. And now Oklahoma is starting to do the same thing. So the Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit against Oklahoma law fair to

keep the border open. Not only will they not do their job, and that was something going back to Dhaka, Obama's Department of Justice had said, well, we're not going to enforce the law. We're going to defer action on that. They took the oath of office to enforce the law. They

took the oath of office to the constitution. They don't care what they swear to the oath breakers people have no honor illegal and yet they will not enforce the law, but they will do everything they can to stop anyone who is actually trying to enforce the law, anyone who's trying to protect this country, because they're trying to destroy this country. Not a penny for the border, but fighting Texas, fighting Oklahoma when they try to do their duty. Yeah,

that kind of lawfair as well. Are we concerned about that kind of lawfair? Well, some people are concerned about that. The people who are supporting Trump are concerned about that. But you know, the lawfair against the pro lifers and against the babies that are being murdered, they don't care about that. James Carvill think there's only a fifty to fifty chance of a presidential debate happening. And he thinks the number one issue for Biden is abortion.

What does that say about the Party of Death when their number one issue is we need to kill more babies? Wow? Wow. And then he says, and then the other thing that we can do is we can make energy a focus, shutting it down. They want to kill energy, they want to kill babies, they want to kill food, They want to kill everything, including us, because this is all about a deep population agenda. Well, going back to where I started with Oliverstone, he's at the con Film

Festival pushing his movie about a Marxist politician. Even he thinks his law fair stuff is ridiculous and an embarrassment. He's not trying to explain it away like Anderson Cooper. And yet when they got his reaction to the Trump Apprentice movie, this is what he had to say. If I go here here, we are. It's Oliverstone on the movie about Trump called Apprentice. I think it's spectacular. Yeah yeah, I don't think that we need more political movies.

And you come from that movie. It's dramatic. Sorry, it's dramatic. It's not about politics. It's about the character. It's citizen Kane in that regard. That's an interesting idea, Citizen Kane in that regard. Because you know The Apprentice, of course, the TV the TV show. And I explained that to people because I figure maybe there's some other people out there

who have never watched Trump on The Apprentice. I never did. I didn't get the joke in what was it a Bugs Life or yeah, Bugs Life, Travis is saying, yeah, I had those two little bugs and they're saying to each other, you fight, No, you fighted And I didn't know what that was like straight over my head. I had no idea what that was about. So I never watched The Apprentice. But what they did, the central premise of The Apprentice, I think is valid. I think

it is a cartoon character assassination. Sounds like I haven't seen it, sounds like a cartoon character assassination. But the fundamental apprentice is actually true, the idea being and I thought it's an interesting idea that a young Donald Trump is kind of in the position of being an apprentice to one of the most vile, corrupt, vicious, machiavellian people of the United States is in the twentieth century, Roy Cohne, it was tail Gunner Joe's number one guy in the

McCarthy trials. But that's the least of what he did. I mean, those people there was a lot of Communist influence and that needed to be exposed. But of course he was doing all kinds of stuff. The guy died of aids. He was a closet homosexual of his life, just like Jaggar Hoover. And yet just like Jaggar Hoover, the two of them prosecuted other homosexuals. He was pushing all kinds of stuff, you know, to attack other homosexuals when he was one himself. This is not the way these guys

operating, you know. It's like our Congress now. They do everything they can to harm America when they're Americans themselves, you know, they just they attack. They hate their own. I think that's a particularly despicable characteristic. But anyway, Roy Cohen was a real snake in every regard, and he was the guy who meant turd a young Donald Trump. In the purpose of this movie is to show young as he pointed out a character study showing Donald

Trump becoming like Roy Cohen. And when I saw that, I knew who Roy Cohen was before I knew who Donald Trump was. When I saw that, it's like, oooh, this relationship there. Of course Roger is tyed. Roger Stone has tied into all this stuff as well. He was close friends with Roy Cohen, and it shows. I mean, it's pretty amazing. So some critics either lauded it as a bone chilling cautionary tale, while others have dismissed it as a vapid cartoon depiction of Trump that never rises beyond

a cheap polemic. It's probably all of that, a cheap polemic as well as a bone chilling cautionary I probably both. I would say both. That'd be my guess. I'm not interested in seeing it. By the way, you know, they can coct a rape scene in it, put that kind of stuff in there, and make it a central I'm not interested in seeing that. It's just like Francis Ford Coppola's new movie, he decided to make

himself. Francis Ford copulate, I'm not interested in seeing the movie. I felt the same way about Oppenheimer. I was really interested in going see Oppenheimer til I started reading about some of the scenes that they gratuitously put in there. It's like, you don't need to put that in there. You've just adulterated your movie with sex that is, you know, absolutely unnecessary, and we know why you're doing it, and it's why I'm not going to go

see it. But anyway, The Apprentice depicts Trump reacting with fury after Evanna disparages his physical appearance. You have a face like an orange, She tells him. You're getting fat, you're getting ugly, you're getting bald, and the future president is then shown forcing his wife to the fore and raping her. In her nineteen ninety divorce deposition, Ivanna Trump described a similar assault that said that occurred shortly after her husband's scalp reduction surgery. Scalp reduction. I

don't know what that is. He's been scalped. She claimed that Trump pushed her to the floor and pulled out handfuls of her hair. I guess also doing a scalp reduction. Ivanna eventually described what followed as rape, but then after they got divorced, I guess, you know, maybe part of the part of the agreement is she's gonna say nice things about him for money. Mister Trump and I had marital relations in which he behaved very differently towards me.

On one occasion during nineteen eighty nine, we had marital relations in which you behaved very differently towards me than he had during our marriage. As a woman, I felt violated. I referred to this as rape, but I do not want my words to be interpreted in a literal or criminal sense, because you know, he's paying me now. He is the gift that just kept on giving. He eventually got the last word. He he buried her in his golf course in order to get a tax advantage. She is now

a hole in one and a credit to the family. That's the way that Trump's eeser. Her body is buried on the grounds of the Trump National Golf Course in Bedminster, New Jersey. Well Peter Bradshaw and The Guardian said, the monstrosity here is almost sentimental. A cartoon xeroxed from many other satirical Trump takes and knowing prophetic echoes of his political future. Well again at the core, Roy Cohenn mentored him one of the most ruthless, corrupt political hacks of

the twentieth century. The Trump campaign, meanwhile, has threatened a lawsuit against the Apprentice. This garbage is pure fiction, which you could apply that epithet to pretty much anything that Hollywood does, even the ones that are based on a true story. You know, it's garbage and it's pure fiction. So I don't know, but they probably won't win the law fair, even though

they're probably right. And think about the thin skinned law fair that is involved here, you know, as his former one of his former lawyers said Ty Cobb, He said, he is a deeply wounded narcissist as we see here, and capable of acting except out of his own perceived self interest or out of revenge. And so when we think about this, you know, this this type of and I mentioned this many times. The kind of insults were thrown back and forth between Jefferson and Adams, the lies that they made up

about each other. What was said about Lincoln's father was his father right accused of this opponent accused his father being hatchet faced nutmeg addic and Abraham Lincoln, a lawyer, sued the pants off of that guy. No he didn't, he didn't file lawsuit. People had thinks ends. People understood that. You know, you have a free speech now, you know that is the appropriate

response if you've been slandered. Like I said before, the censorship that government does is in my opinion, always traceable back to politics or to religion. But you know, if it's a one on one with private actors and stuff like that, if the private actors are not being directed to put out garbage amount people as a character assassination, if they're not being directed to censorship people by the government, if they're just acting on their own, they might out

of hatred slander somebody. And their remedy to that is not to shut down free speech and have government censorship. The remedy of that is to have a lawsuit. But that will be the way that Trump is going to react. So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. Oh well, by the way, let me just say before we take a break, I want to think think Audi for the tip yesterday. I did

not see it. Thank you very much, and he says, pardon the rhetoric in the chat yesterday, just having a little final folks who are trying to stir up racial division in the chat. Well, I didn't see any of that, but appreciate that from Audi at Modern Retro Radio, and I appreciate any tips that people have because we are at this is the twenty second. We've got about another eight or nine days left and we are spot on at fifty percent. We've updated the updated the gas gauge just to let you

know. So let me give you a commercial, just to remind you that we were supported by your voluntary contributions. We'll be right back. The common maid they created common Core, dumbed down our children. They created common path as to track and control us. Their Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image

of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,

please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidknightshow dot com. Well, let's talk a little bit about as an update to we talked about yesterday. It's absurd peer that the Pentagon has put in and they said that none of the aid that has been unloaded from the US peer over the last couple of days

has been delivered to the Palestinian population. Are you surprised about that? If they're going to block a convoy of trucks with food medicine not to let them come in over roads, you think it's going to be any different with this peer? Are they supposed to be impressed about the fact that the Pentagon built this? Rube Goldberg is the veteran that I talked about yesterday called it. None of the aid that's been unloaded from the temporary peer the US constructed off

the coast of Gaza has been delivered to the Palestinian population. As the US works with the UN and Israel to identify safe delivery routes inside the enclave. The Pentagon said yesterday several desperate Gazans intercepted trucks delivering aid from the pier over the weekend, leading the UN to suspend the delivery operations until the logistical challenges are resolved. A Pentagon spokesperson Major General writer, just interesting, just like

the writer rental trucks is the way he spells his name. I guess he's the logistical guy. Asked whether any of the aid has been delivered to the people of Gaza, writer said, as of today, I do not believe, so I have doubts. Said a Gaza resident to CNN. I don't understand this floating peer. Guess what neither do we or what it indicates and what it's per se. It's just too stupid. Nobody can understand this. Does that have a different purpose or something, because this is like the dumbest

way in the world to deliver aid. They say it's for aid, but people are apprehensive is this aid or is it something else. We know that the US has never supported the Palestinian cause, so it's improbable that it is giving us aid without something in return. And of course in the past, you know, after they came in with some food trucks and then people were starving. They rushed the food trucks and the Israelis, they say, panicked

and started shooting people. So then the US said, all right, well we'll deliver food by parachute, and then they dropped the stuff out of the plane. Some of the parachutes had not deployed. They had these massive food pallets. Acted like bombs, destroyed a couple of houses, killed some people. All right, so we'll build a peer now, just open up the open up the road there and actually set this up and deliver it to people. But this is the take that WND had. Nearly seventy percent of Gaza

aid from the US dash stolen. These people are starving. This is like Les misrabright, you know, lock the guy up because he stole a loaf of bread. Oh yeah, bad people. These starving people stealing food off of these trucks. They just basically mounted the trucks and helped themselves to some

of the food parcels. These starving thieves did this amazing new three d and twenty million, some people say more three hundred and fifty million floating pier built by the US military and the humanitarian aid was stolen by the people that should have been had it given to them. Eleven trucks were cleaned out by Palestinians on the journey to the World Food Program warehouse. They've not seen trucks for a while, sod are you an official to reuiters. They just basically mounted

the trucks and helped themselves to the food parcels. Well, it's not just that, you know, Israel has seized equipment from the Associated Press and then later after they realized how bad the optics would be, they returned it. They accused the agency of Associated Press of violating the Al Jazeera ban. I guess they thought the a standard for Al Jazeera instead of Associated Press. Associated

Press is bad enough. The Israeli government sees some equipment belonging to the Associated Press on Tuesday, accusing the news agency of violating a recent ban against the Cutter backed Al Jazeera network, which takes a pro Palestinian stance, before they then returned it. But I guess, you know, for Breitbart, who has become so incredibly partisan that they're not a reliable source, and it is

difficult. That's one of the reasons why I don't cover it much. It is difficult to know what is real and what is not coming out of Israel because there's so much propaganda on both sides. But Israeli officials reverse the decision even though they said that the AP equipment violated their media law. They say they have a media law, when, as I said before, free speech is never a crime. Censorship is always a crime, and censorship is usually

there to cover up other crimes that are being committed by the government. There is no free speech, no free press there in Israel. They have contempt for the very idea. As a matter of fact, they hate free speech and a free press. Here in the United States, they also hate freedom of religion as well, and so the Israeli government is actually putting pressure on people like Machiavelli and Mike to shut down our own First Amendment because they hate

it so much. The Foreign Press Association is alarmed by Israel's confiscation of Associated presses broadcasting equipment today along the Israeli border near Gaza. They wrote, this is the latest in a series of chilling steps by the Israeli government to stifle the media, and an opposition leader Lapid said this is an act of madness.

You know, he's in Israeli and he said this in Hebrew. So that is this guy who criticized because you know, we're told by Machiavelli and Mike and the non governmental organization that he referenced to define what anti semitism is, we're told that anti semitism is criticism of the government of Israel. This guy is an opposition politician and he has criticized Netanyahu's coalition government. You know, net Yahoo does not have have even a simple majority of fifty plus one.

Fifty percent plus one. This is a parliamentary situation. And so as we saw in the Netherlands, you have multiple political parties. Actually I think it's a better system than what we have. But when they select a prime minister, it comes from the party directly elected president. So it comes from

parties. I believe it's the same way in Israel. And so when Gert Wilder's party won the most votes but still didn't get passed fifty percent, he had to put together a coalition of the other parties so they could get passed fifty percent. And the same thing happened in Israel. They had election after election after election, where Nettaw who did not get over fifty percent on his own, he needed to have a coalition party with other people. He continued

to try to put these coalitions together and they continued to fail. It took Gert Wilders months to put together a coalition. And so is it anti semitic to criticize a politician who doesn't even have majority support. He's got a majority coalition, but he doesn't have majority support himself. There are people in Israel political issues as well as religious issues. The ultra Orthodox don't like Zionism in general, and they don't like this secular government, and the secular government doesn't

like them and makes no bones about it. So are they anti Semitic? Are the ultra Orthodox Jews anti Semitic because they criticize this political Israel? Is this politician anti Semitic? Well, you know, I guess Mike Johnson and Netanya who would say yes, he is. Punish him. Netanya who reacted to the International Criminal Court's indictment, they said they're pouring water, pouring gasoline on the fires of anti Semitism. You see, if you criticize him or

you indict him, you're anti Semitic. So that's his response. He doesn't defend his reactions. He calls his critics anti semitic. You criticize me. This is what Fauci did, isn't it. Fauci said, you criticize me, you're anti science. Who says you criticize me, you're anti semitic. That's what it is. You criticize a politician and a foreign government. You criticize a government. Oh well then you are racist. No, no, you're doing what should be protected in a democracy. It's called a tyranny when

you don't support that kind of stuff. So to criticize net Yahoo is no more anti semitism than criticizing Fauci is anti science. Folks don't fall for this stuff. And what that does is when you doesn't. Doesn't that insight You see Fauci doing that. Now, these people out there they're anti science, Well, no we're not. And it shows what he is. It shows he's a liar, a thief, he's posturing and all this stuff. And it shows that Natanya who is a liar, a thief, a murderer,

just like Fauci is. This is why they censor people to hide their crimes. That's why they call people racist. It's why we shouldn't care what the Anti Defamation League or what the Southern Poverty Law Center or what the APAK or any of these people say about us. They're nothing. There are a bunch of lying, criminal, criminal murderers out there and they will say anything to get their way. And this shows that that's what that is. As I

showed you yesterday. You know, it's a good example of this is this Sky News thing and I'm going to play it again because you need to look at this. You know, this is a reporter saying, you know what about all this grave of mass murderers. And I didn't talk about it yesterday, but the bottom chiron says, well, the US is going to withhold money from this particular IDF agency. Oh really just from that particular one.

And yet this politician doesn't have the decency. So wow, I don't think that they were Actually I can't believe that the Israeli government would handcuff people that they have captured combatants and shoot him in the back of the head and put him in a mass grave because she believes that's true. Instead, she knows good and well that they did it. Instead, she comes up with all these absurd things about well, they must have been in the process of fighting

with their hands tied behind their back. At least two hundred and eighty three corps is found in a mass grave at NASA Hospital in Can't Unite. The UN Humans' Rights chief has said he is absolutely horrified. Who do you think those bodies are? Probably terrorists? The ratio of combatant to innocent that Israel has is unprecedented in modern warfare. We know we've killed about fifteen thousand terrorists. There was a terrible battle in those areas, so the chances died.

How do you think these people died in gun battles with Israel? Why do you think some of the bodies were found with ties around their hands? Well, because we've probably arrested the terrorists and then well, I don't know if the terrorists fall back. I wasn't there, But all I can tell you is that this has been a very difficult urban warfare that nobody on Earth has experienced, this type of warfare where the terrorists are hiding in tunnels where their

cows because they won't face their enemy. They just leave innocent people up there whilst they hide in tunnels that are bigger than the London underground and they come out, they shoot, and it could be that many of them were shot and they were shooting in a battle, and would be that there were bombs thrown by them and grenades. There could be a million different scenarios of why

these were found. But remember we're in the middle of it. I just just to clarify for me, if you would, how do they fight back with their hands tied behind their backs? Well, we don't know what they were doing before their times hide behind their backs, do we? But you're arrested. But if you've managed to cable tize, yesquently find them dead? Should we? And maybe again we're just conjecturing. Maybe his friends were a grenade and then what happens. Maybe there was a miss out, maybe they

threw a rocket and then what happens. Again, this is conjecture. I wasn't there, You weren't there. We can't know. All I know is that our army has either was Amnesty International and they say this, yeah, well, you know, as I said yesterday, it doesn't take much of a moral discernment to understand that when you capture people, you give them due process, even if you're going to execute them as spies or something like that.

As a matter of fact, I mentioned the Great Escape. What happened at the end of the Great Escape when they capture these people escaped, well pretty much the same thing. Eleven of your men are being returned today. Oh I do not have some information. I I am directed by higher authority to inform you said, the fifty of your officers we are shot while escaping shot. The personal effects will be returned. How many of them are wounded? We are the names of said? How many of the fifty were wounded?

None? They so Hi are st only directs me to inform using said fifty men. Where I see, Yeah, we see, don't we? We see what's going on? Does she really think? I mean, you know, here's of course this is we don't exactly know how the Nazi that was there felt about it. But in this fictional work, they don't even

make a Nazi as bad as that deputy Mayor of Jerusalem. And then you have Netna who who reacts immediately, you know, because just like Fauci is science, and any criticism of Fauci is anti science, well, any criticism of Nea who is anti Semitism. The outrageous decision by the ICC prosecutor coming to seek arrest warrants against the democratically elected leaders of Israel is a moral outrage of historic proportions. It will cast an everlasting mark of shame on the International

Court. Israel is waging a just war against Ramas, a genocidal terrorist organization that perpetrated the worst attack on the Jewish people since the Holocaust. Mister Khan creates a twisted and false moral equivalence between the leaders of Israel and the henchmen of Kramas. This is like creating a moral equivalence after September eleventh between President

Bush and Osama bin Laden. Yeah, I've created that equivalents myself. Actually, you know, cam Osman, there is something about him and the US government seems like they're almost in on something. And you know what we saw happening afterwards is the other shoot. What we saw happening in twenty twenty is another shoot to drop from nine to eleven. But as part of that global plan to low us down, you had Nettan Yahu on board with Pfizer in

the World Economic Forum that other shoe to drop from nine to eleven. I gave Pfiser the argument that they could benefit from the data that we could produce, and they were convinced, and then we we went along and did this, and in fact our health system did exactly that. We have a digital digitized system for distributing health fourteen hundred sites in a very small country of nine

million, and they just work it out and again on the distribution. You know, I take say, I don't call them that much five times a day. I heard that you had been on the phone seventy times with the Pfiser talking to Davos Nazis seventeen not seventy, but twenty one time. But also I speak with Stefan Bansel Maderna, I have spoken to the heads of the other companies. I think you need a personal leadership here. You know,

it's like checking on munitions in a war. Yeah, yeah, the jabs were like ammunition in a war, a war against his own people. Look, he said that we're fighting a just war. And as I've said before, if somebody attacks you, even if you provoke it, even if you enable it, even if you get people to look the other way, you're still justified to push back. But you're not justified to continue to attack a defenseless civilian population for months and months and months, with massive bombs,

with starvation campaigns and all the rest of this stuff. That is not what a just war is about. A just war is about stopping the killing. A just war seeks an end as soon as possible. To a war, a just war would be focused on getting the people who cause this, rather than removing people from a geographical area for your own purposes. There's nothing at

all just about this war. Nothing could have made an argument at the very beginning when they were attacked, but that's the way this has been conducted. Is not a just war in any means, And so Lindsey Graham was very upset about this. He believes that this could set a precedent. So we hopefully together we'll find a way to rest our displeasure with the ICC coast. If they'll do this to Israel, we're next. This group tried to come after us, I hope, so, yeah, you can clap all you

want to. They tried to come after our soldiers in Afghanistan, but reason prevailed. So at the end of the day, here, what I hope to happen is that we level sanctions against the ICC for this outrage to not only help our friends in Israel, but protect ourselves over time mis sector your state, because we all know we're the bigger satan, right the president, the statement was excellent. Senator Schumer's statement on the floor was excellent about the

outrage here. They have destroyed the notion of complimentarity. They have misled people in the United States Senates about their intention, and they shall and will pay a price. Miss Well, that's about all I can take of Miss lindsay there. But look, yeah, if we let them come after him for an unjust war. We look at all the words that we've started. We've

got coup's assassinations. I mean, where would this start if we actually started having indictments of people like Lindsey Graham, for example, like they indicted Henry Kissinger and rightfully so, and they ought to indict Lindsey Graham. This guy has not seen a war anywhere that he doesn't want to be involved in. U And while we're speaking of literal Nazis, we have Zelenski who is now ruling under martial law, just as we were ruled under martial law by our

two beloved presidential candidates, Donald Trump and Joe Biden. He has now suspended elections until after the war, which I guess you know we should say, Hans are are we the bad guys here? Perhaps we'll be right back and we're going to talk when we come back, we're talking about some of the climate issues. We'll be right back making sense common again. You're listening to the David Night Show. Well, do you remember when ross Boro was running

for president. He was talking about the North American Free Trade Agreement a treaty, and he said, we're going to have this giant sucking sound sucking the life out of our economy. And he was right about that, absolutely right about it. The giant sucking sound was not the stuff being sucked into Mexico for the most part. However, you know it really was going into China. Well, we now have a giant sucking sound based on climate lies,

based on the other treaty, the Paris Climate Accord that is there. They passed these treaties without getting them signed. It is a giant sucking sound because now they've got the world's largest vacuum is there to suck carbon dioxide out of the air, and it just opened. And of course when you look at the headline from CNN. It doesn't say carbon dioxide, and that confuses these

people. They don't know the difference. And I've seen them get these things mixed up over and over again between carbon dioxide, which we exhal and all living animals do, and the plants take it in. They don't know the differenceween carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide, which is what kills you if you leave your engine running with a garage door down. But the world's largest plant designed to suck planet heating pollution out of the atmosphere like a giant vacuum began operating

in Iceland last week. Yeah, keep telling yourself that climate line. It's called Mammoth. It is the second commercial direct air capture plant opened by a Swiss company called Climb Works as in Climate and it is ten times bigger than its predecessor. We started running in twenty twenty two. They are terraforming the planet. They are going to try to block out the sunlight that the plants need. They're going to try to suck out the carbon dioxide, the small

amount that's there that the plants need. They want to starve us. It isn't just that they don't want us having meat and dairy. They don't want us having plants either. Direct air capture is a technology designed to suck in air, strip out the carbon using chemicals. The carbon can then be injected deep beneath the ground if you pay off enough politicians and construct green boon doggles. Actually, somebody called it a green doggle. I think that's a good

idea. You have these green doggles, just like you have with the North and South Dakota governors Christineome and Doug Bergham, pals of Trump. Of course, Christinom shot her chances of being VP in the head as she killed that dog and bragged about it. But he is still in the running. Bergham is and Trump has had them at mar Lago along with the CEO of a

company that wants to have this pipeline run across the country. Suck the carbon dioxide out of these industrial processes and out of the air and stick it into the ground there in North and South Dakota. And they will take anybody's property that gets in their way. As So, if you think the Trump is on the side of energy, first of all, you weren't paying attention in the first four years because he didn't do anything to shut down the basis of

all these lies and actions, and that is the Paris Climate Cord. But he's also pals with these Republican governors. It's a Uni party, folks, it's a Uni party. You keep telling yourself that there's a difference at the federal level. If you do that, you're deranged, absolutely deranged. The whole operation will be powered by Iceland's abundant clean geothermal energy. Is it clean? Our volcanoes clean? You know? Volcanoes spew way more particulous into the

atmosphere than we do. They can cause many ice ages that last for several years. That happened with Krakatoa east of Java. They had a Mani ice age after that eruption there. But oh, the geothermal stuff that's really clean? Is it? Of course, there's nothing that you can do about it, whether you like it or not, because there's really nothing that you can do about climate, whether you like it or not. Either the volcanoes not under your control. Guess what, Neither is the sun. Neither are the

solar cycles that happen. You can no more predict what the solar cycles are going to be then you can predict when a volcano is going to rup, you'll get some early warning from it, but you can't predict how it's going

to affect the climate. When it's going to change. They're going to pull out thirty six thousand tons of carbon a year, equivalent to taking around seventy eight hundred gas powered cars off the road for a year, or you know, telling Taylor Swift you can't travel, or Bill Gates or some of these other people. Oh that's great, I want don't you just ground one or two of these elite billionaires and tell them that they can't travel, and then

you won't have to build this whole thing. But this is another scheme for some people to make money. Climb Works did not give an exact cost for each of the tons of carbon that they remove. Again, CO two is what they're talking about. They're not talking about carbon, but they said that it was closer to one thousand a ton than one hundred a ton. One hundred a ton is what is widely seen as something that'll make it affordable and

viable. So like all of this green stuff, it's not affordable, it's not viable, it is not sustainable, it's not rational, makes no sense and so, but then, nevertheless, you have a guy who has become a professor of carbon capture. It's like the Wizard of Oz eplurbasunum, I hereby bestow upon you the title of professor of carbon capture. Garsh so I will square the two sides equal square the high button. There's no Actually he

got it wrong. I don't know exactly what he said about the Pythagorean theorem, but yeah, this guy probably doesn't know the patagularium. There many more than the scarecrow of Wizard of Oz knows what it is. So there's been a new study that has found something groundbreaking. They have found that if you've got more fuel in the forest, that you'll have the forest burn more so, if you neglect taking out the dead wood and the fallen wood, you're

leaving fuel on the ground and you'll have bigger forest fires. You know, it's interesting. My uncle, who was head of forestry department at the University of Missouri Columbia, told me that over forty years ago, it might have been fifty years ago now he said, this is what they're changing. This, He said, they're not doing stewardship anymore. This this is radical environmentalism where they worship nature. Oh, don't touch nature. We're not going to

take care of the forests. And he says it's going to burn. And I saw it happen in bass Drop where we lived. I saw it happen in Oregon, Travis, and I interviewed a Lagger as a totter, Tad. I can't remember Tad Okay who had his prime for us that he had been you know, private land. He had would and he had been gradually accumulating that for his retirement, and the neglect of the government on their public lands caused a massive forest fire that's billed onto and burned his land. So

here's the study. Enhanced future vegetation growth with elevated carbon dioxide concentrations could increase fire activity. Wow, well, here's some reasons that I don't believe. And climate change. This is a good article. I liked this from I liked this from The Daily Skeptic. And we'll put the background music here of Hitchcock. This is all about the climate change mcguffin. That's right, And

there we are. We're season fifty four of the climate change line. There's Alphad Hitchcock there and the suicidal news that the politicians want to put around each of our necks. Well, he says. Number one, looking back through history, there have always been doomsday profits folks who say the world is coming to an end? Are these modern activists not just the current version of this.

Number two, I look at some of the facts. CO two is only zero point zero four percent of the atmosphere, and humans are responsible for only three percent of that. And again, as I point out, it's like two point five times, you know, ten thousands of a percent if you multiply those out, He said, Britain is responsible for only one percent of the world's CO two output. And I think, really, and you're going to take everything from us because we are one percent of the world's CO

two output, which is three percent of the zero point four percent. I looked it up. You know in China, which you're not worried about at all. China produces what they say is twenty seven percent of the CO two and there's no restrictions on them. India puts out ten percent and there's no restrictions on them. They got thirty seven percent of the CO two emissions are being put out by just two countries who have absolutely no CO two restrictions.

Are they serious about this or is this an economic attack? Number three. I've listened to some top scientists who say CO two doesn't drive global warming, that it's actually a good thing, It's actually a vital thing, he said. Number four, I note that most of the loudest climate change activists are socialists on the left. Are they just trying to use this to push their dreams of a de industrialized socialist utopia. Well, yes, that's the idea,

that's the mcguffin, folks. I also note the crossover between green activist and BLM ones, and gender ones and pro Hamas ones, because the common thread is communism Marxism, folks, he says, as an amateur psychologist. Number five, I know that humans are susceptible to manias, and we saw just the last few years are extremely malleable and easily fool The population is with the pandemic. Mcguffin. I've looked number six, how the implications of net

zero. It's incredibly expensive. It will vastly reduce living standards and of course life expectancy. I would add, we will have shorter, more difficult lives if these depopulationists get their way Number seven zero will also lead to significant diminishment of personal freedom. It even threatens democracy as people are told they must do certain things, they must not do other things, and they may even be restricted about speaking out about these things. Oh imagine that. Yeah, we've

seen it. Don't travel, don't eat this, don't eat that. What number eight? What will be the worst thing that will happen if the doomsayers are correct? A rise in temperature? Well, that begs the question, what is the ideal temperature? Do you know? For how long do we need to maintain that ideal temperature or how long do we have to be worried about the temperature rising? He says, I'm suspicious of utopias. Communists are

always looking for utopias. Number nine. If one consequence of climate change is rising sea levels, wouldn't it be better to spend some money building more sea defenses to protect our land like the Dutch did. Yeah, why are we killing ourselves in our society, our food production, our energy production. If you're really worried about it, build some dikes along the coast. But instead what we see is Obama and his ilk actually buying expensive places to live on

the coast. That they and their climate alarmists say are going to be underwater. Well, he finishes up by saying he likes the sun. He lives in England. Yeah, well was it Lawrence of Arabia. I think guy said you're here because Englishmen like desolate places and they like hot places or whatever. He says, I prefer being warm to being cold, because he's been cold for so long. Well, I grew up in Tampa, so I prefer being I prefer cool, too warm, just the opposite way. But

look, it's all about the mcguffin. It's not about me, and it's not about what you want. It's about what people like Clock Schwab and his ilk want and it is I guess we could say that the mcguffin has offered, Hitchcock explained to us, is really about murder. It's really what it's about. It's about mass murder. It's called depopulation. Uh. Well, we have our guest who is ready. We're going to go to him, and I want to say to Guard Goldsmith on Rock Finn, He says,

David, I'm so glad you played that Sky news clip. I caught that over the weekend. Inside a larger video that I'd watched and I wanted to find it again. That's the one where the uh, you know, they shot people in the back of the head. But I'm sure that they were actually, you know, firing rockets and throwing grenades with their hands tied behind their back, that ridiculous thing, he says. I wanted to find it again, but I've absorbed so many videos this week. I spent hours in

my history scanning IDs again and couldn't find it. The criminal idea of activity back by US politicians, fatuous politicians, is stunning. And that clip is the key. I think it really is. I mean, you look at that, and it is We're talking about political actions of foreign government. We're talking about war. It's difficult to find out what's going on with war with any certainty, but we can be certain about a few things that are there.

We're going to take a break and when we come back, we're going to be joined by our guest, who is going to be talking about artificial intelligence. How do we put this genie back in the bottle or how do we protect ourselves? I think it's very important we start thinking about this. We have to expose artificial intelligence for what it is. We have to expose the dangers of it. As I've said many times, I don't believe the danger is some kind of a terminator thing. I believe that it's a different

kind of danger. I think it's a dangerous surveillance states and things like that. But we're going to talk about that in more depth with somebody who has been studying this for quite some time. We'll talk about the monopolistic aspects of it, because he's coming from a libertarian perspective as well, and how do we protect ourselves from this surveillance state, which I think is the key aspect of this artificial intelligence. We'll be right back the common man. They created

common Core and dumbed down our children. They created common past, track and control us their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. It is what we have in common that is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything

about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. D Davidknightshow dot com is now is Andrew Riddle. He Riddle all

right. He is a CEO of Liberation Technology Services, a company at the forefront of cloud cloud hosting industry, and he's involved in cybersecurity, and he has contacted me. He wanted to talk about artificial intelligence and the threats to us, and they are tremendous threats to us. Thank you for joining us, Andrew, Well, thank you so much for having me. Really looking forward to the conversation. I am too, and I've had people on many

times to talk about artificial intelligence. I had a guy who was with a you know, military industrial complex, and they were talking about the different modeling things that they were doing, and it was very very interesting. He even had concerns about even though he felt that it was necessary in this arms race against tryinga to have all this stuff. He says, well, I don't know how we actually once we turn over control, and it's inevitable. We're

going to turn control over in a war scenario. How do we stop it? How do we get control back? He said, Well, I don't know yet. You know, so they're talking about this stuff, and the question is at we get control back from these things. Let me let me as we start here, let me get your reaction to what I played earlier today. I'm sure that you've maybe seen the announcement about Copilot from Microsoft,

that they're going to put artificial intelligence on your laptop. It's going to constantly be taking screenshots of what you're doing and making assessments about what you want. You know, of course, to be your friend and your servant, and it will never violate your privacy. What do you think about that? Do you think anybody wants this? Do you think anybody believes those promises? Well? I think the scary fact of the matter is it's already happening. Microsoft

is just you know, openly acknowledging the fact that they're doing this. Right. We see this with TikTok, We see this with Google, We see this with all these other companies that have integrated the AI and other you know, data collection methods. You know, TikTok a little known fact. They access every single app on your device, and so you know they're they're also looking at your banking apps, your financial apps, your health apps, and

all these other things. But I think it is concerning, you know, the whether they're publicly acknowledging it like Microsoft, or or you know, convertly doing it. I think that it is very concerning because with that sheer amount of data, you know, the question lies what will they be able to

do with that? Right? It's not just to make suggestions, you know, will they be able to then start subliminally targeting us with you know, the obvious things like products and services, but you know, will they be able to also start manipulating our behaviors, our actions throughout the day because they know how in a subconscious level, we react to certain triggers and environments.

You know, Okay, they want everyone to perform action a you know, they know if they hit us with the right messaging or visuals or audio, our audible you know methods, you know, will react. Yeah, they call it nudging. You know, they know how to give you subtle pushes in different ways. They call it a nudge. And you know, the whole artificial intelligence thing is based on scraping data from all over the Internet,

so we know they're doing that. We know that everything just put out there in social media is available to any government agency to scrape or any company can scrape it there, so that part of it is not new. I guess when I looked at the uh the Microsoft copilot, I thought, oh great, now I get my own personal little Stasi spy to keep. Before there was a large engagement from like the human element of a platform that would have to say, okay, well this either violates terms of service or hey,

we want to push this narrative and things like that. But we're essentially now handing all of the data and all of the control over to this AI. And you know, as you were saying, just for the break, you know, it isn't the terminator AI that we all think of, but it is possible. You think chad GBT launched less than a year ago, and the developments that we've seen in the space since then are you know, monumental. You know, what will this environment look like in twelve twenty four to

thirty six months. I think that's where we need to proactively start thinking and start planning, because yeah, we and might not be able to put the genie back in the bottle once it's activated, especially if you give it a gun, yeah, which they're doing. They're tying in the flyplanes and drop

bombs and there's a gun, you know. And speaking of that, there was an excellent novel that was written about twelve or thirteen years ago by Daniel Suarez called Kill Decision, and it's about using AI and drones and how disruptive and revolutionary that was going to be to the military industrial complex. And my son just went back, who told me about that years ago. We listened to it years ago, and he went back and listened to it again.

He said, you know, and that novel. What kicks it off is the AI's ability to look at a picture and to make assessments about what is in that picture, just as we saw demonstrated last week. And you know, the open AI, the chat four to oh where you got? You know, everybody's focusing on the voice of Scarlett Johansson, but it really is concerning. Even though we know that it is a demo and there may be some rigged aspects of it, it truly was pretty amazing what that was able

to do. And as you point out there's been massive leaps and what is the perceived capability of these systems. Yeah, you know, and we've already

seen that technology really get involved in this selection already. Yeah. You know, in New Hampshire there was the Joe Biden deep fake where they were able to you know, one of the Democratic challengers was able to persuade voters not to go out and vote or to alter their vote because they got a phone call from Joe Biden, Right, And that's where it becomes so concerning because there is very there's next to no oversight in this space, aside from you

know, these technology companies saying oh, well, we'll do better, but there's really no oversight in steps put in place ahead of the election to protect us against these types of threats. And you know, it's one of those things, as we've seen in twenty twenty two, in twenty twenty you know, trying to fix something after the fact. The courts, the public opinions,

you know, they're not going to deal with that. So you know, there's a chance that we could see a deep fake give out false information have a impact in the election, and everyone will just kind of throw their hands up and say well, we'll try not to let this happen again, but the outcome of the election is still decided, and I think it's important. You know, we've seen lies and manipulation and propaganda. It's always been

there as part of an election. I think what is different about this, And I've mentioned this from the very beginning with artificial intelligence, even when we had the chatbots that were hallucinating with stuff. Immediately, even though they were coming up with these wile scenarios, people started backfilling and saying, well, maybe this thing is really aware, you know, and anthropomorphizing it and giving it credibility instead of looking at this and saying, this is a bunch of

crap. You know, because I started my first thing when I interacted it was with it. I started talking to it about climate change or about the Pfizer shot or something like that. You know. Of course it kind of just shut me down. And so I was like, Okay, I get this, It's just another control mechanism. But most people, I think the

real danger is the confidence that people will put in this. You know, I was trained as an engineer, and we were always told from the very beginning, garbage in, garbage out, don't trust this just because you've got a computer print out. Don't trust it just because it's a model from somebody. Because you can make the computer say anything that you want. It's not necessarily right, and people shut down that critical thought. And I think that's

one of the most deceptive and dangerous things about artificial intelligence. I think that's why it's important to talk about it. But let me ask you. You know you mentioned earlier about putting the genie back in the bottle? What can we do and what can we do proactively? Because this stuff is rapidly evolving and people are looking at it in terms of we typically react after the fact instead of saying, well, I know where this is going, so let's

put in some safeguards about this. Is there anything that we can or should be doing in your opinion, yeah, So I think that we from a market perspective, can really dictate the direction that AI goes. You know, if products are being pushed, you know, without your consent, without the ability to opt out, then my recommendation is vote with your dollars and don't support those platforms. Right AI. The AI that we see today is just a tool, and so it is as good or as bad as those wielding

it. And so at the end of the day, you know, if Google is saying, hey, you're going to you know, accept Gemini. Gemini is everywhere, same with Copilot, then use a different browser, right,

one that is not forcing an AI on you. And if we see, you know, hundreds of millions of Americans start to change their behaviors, well, then those companies will start to reassess the implementation and how they're looking at AI not as something that necessarily has to be pushed on every single person, but something that individuals have the ability to opt into and to utilize,

right. You know, It's one thing if you log in to chat GBT and type in prompts and get responses, that is a opt in action. But to say, you know, we're going to put an AI into the search engine and it's going to track everything that you do, filter everything that you see, present the narrative in the stories that we want you to see, then we can't support that, right you know. I think oftentimes people think about making an impact in this nation as something they only do every two

years in an election. But we have the ability to vote with our wallets and vote with our feet every single day. And if we actually get intentional about that, you know, this is still very much a capitalistic society and those companies will will come to stark reality very very quickly. I agree, I really endorse that what you just said, and we need to give them the bud light treatment, you know, and boycott them. And you know, so often we look at things and say, well, you know,

I know they're going to be using this to mine data. I know they're going to use it for anticipatory intelligence and geospatial intelligence and all these other things as part of the surveillance state. Can we get the politicians to put in some legislation is going to block all that that isn't going to happen. Most likely they haven't even address Section two and reevaluating the broad protections against lawsuit with many of these tech companies. Plus you look at it, Google, AWS

and some of the other big players. Those are the biggest donors. And you know, elections almost a year after years, so I think, you know what, I've come to the realization the Silicon Valley companies are going to do everything that they can to keep the Democrats in power. That's because they know that there's at least a chance, especially under Trump, that Republicans will take up this issue and pass legislation to you know, kind of balance out

the playing field. And so they're going to fight like hell to kind of keep their open payground for as long as possible. You know, they play that. I think they play that game on both sides though. I mean we just saw what Speaker John's I call on Michael vellih and Mike Well he

just did about Faiza. You know, if we think they we're going to stop anything, certainly at the federal level, people just need to look at you know, that April twentieth where that four twenty what was he smoking where he I think he was smoking rolled up one hundreds that he got from Silicon Valley and the intelligence community and the military industrial complex for their wars for the PISA expansion because he extended it and he expanded it, and so these people

are not open to shutting this down. I mean, he got twenty million dollars in his first quarter as first full quarter as speaker, and so you're right, they're giving them money. And I think the most effective thing that we can do. I think what is important for grassroots change is to expose artificial intelligence for what it is. It's artificial, it's fake, as I've been talking about this, and it's bias exactly, bias pulled into it in

his leaders. Yeah, yeah, yeah, And we've seen you know, the the kind of toxic bias in you know, culture via the Twitter files, right. You know, if it is that bad at Twitter at the time, who's to say it's not as bad or worse at Google or AWS and Microsoft. And so you know, you have to look at that and

understand that bias. And I think that you know, that's why we see the onslaught of attacks from every single direction against Donald Trump, because at the end of the day, you know, they realize Donald Trump is one of those few politicians that is harder to manipulate, right. You know, you do have the career politicians like Johnson, like McCarthy, you know where they're

they're pretty predictable. But then you know, you throw some of these other elected officials in and you know there's more of a chance, not saying they will one hundred percent, but there's a higher chance that they will take up the issues with Section two thirty. And that's what we have to hope for and to also push on our elected officials to do. Yeah, I think that is I would agree with you that Trump is unpredictable. Do not necessarily

expect them to keep any of us problems. You got betterment in there too, And you know we are seeing an age of you know, elected some elected not necessarily following the standard playbook. Actually surprise entertainment. I agree. I was absolutely surprised. You know, the Turks and Caicos where they've now arrested five Americans because they found a bullet in their suitcase, not a gun, but a bullet, and they're going to give them a mandatory minimum of

twelve years. They had a congressional delegation go down then Fetterman was one of them. I thought, what is going on? I mean to get his mind back? What is happening with this guy? Uh? He seems to have completely changed for the better in many different ways. I don't know, I haven't seen everything that he's done. I'm I'm not endorsing Fetterman, but I was surprised he did the right thing. And look, I want to give people credit whenever they do the right thing wherever they are. But I

agree with you. I think the key thing is that we have to get people to understand some basic values. Uh, they have to be as opposed to the surveillance state has as much as they are to you know, grooming a kids with this transgender thing. You know, if we want to get them to reject this stuff like they rejected bud Light, we have to have them as much in favor of privacy and free speech as they are in favor of parental rights and things like that. So there's the problem. Is the

reason that people are not pushing back against it. A. They don't understand the danger of it. B. They don't understand how deceptive it is. And see, they don't really embrace the values of privacy. They're not opposed to the surveillance state as much as they need to be. They don't understand the dangers of that. I think that's one of the key things. And

I agree with you. I think we're not going to be able to get the federal government to do anything, but we can have We have a tremendous amount of power if we can muster public opinion to support the good things and to oppose the bad things, and just to be revoltsed by this as much as we are by Dylan Mulvany, Well, yeah, I think that it's it's a very interesting a situation. That's exactly why we found a liberation to protect people's data, to restore their right to privacy, to not no longer

collect and monitor and monetize their information and online habits. But you know, you look at this and I think that there is a real wave because we

have to think about it in a larger scope. The left has been activated and mobilized, you know, pushing these ideologies for over twenty plus years, you know, with Soros Arabella and all of these other institutions, you know, Conservatives, we've actually been re engaged for only about three and a half four years at this point, and so you know, we are over a

decade behind, but can quickly make up the ground. And you know, for the average everyday American, you know, most of these issues don't impact us in our homes, right, but we do see that it is, in my opinion, kind of causing a degrading societal impact and moving us away from the founding principles of this nation. And so it might not impact you every single day, but that does not mean you should sit on the sidelines like Let's be honest. You look at the kids at Columbia and NYU.

They probably couldn't even put out point out Gauz on a map if they tried.

But they have this tendency of mobilization that they are are being fed I think garbage information, but that is still causing them to be mobilized and getting out and you know, exercising their First Amendment rights to a degree, and you know, trying to impact political change and so on the Christian and conservative side, the libertarian side, we have to realize that, you know, we can't sit idly by and think that Donald Trump is going to save us

or the Republican Party is to get to save us. No, it's going to take every single one of us to be activated fifteen minutes a day, whether it's through talking to your neighbors, are you know, spending your dollars with aligned companies. I agree, And that's how we actually save this nation. Yeah, this is all thing. It's going to be from the bottom

up. You know, it's not going to be from the top down, and it's going to be being an awareness that the little things that you do, as you point out, talking to your neighbor, getting them disavowed from this almost a superstitious awe of what artificial intelligences. I've got an email question that was sent to us. It says, do you think that this is from Johnny said? Do you think the AI is as good as it seems?

And I've talked about that a little bit. You know, what is your assessment of this as somebody who's in cybersecurity tell us, you know exactly what. I read an article yesterday about a guy who said, I tried to explain this to people, and he said, the way I look at it, he said, it's it's like a matrix. He said, it doesn't even understand a question. You know, it doesn't oh that it's getting

a question. It just looks at those words and a kind of process that processes that in a language model, and then it compares that to other matrices

and tries to come up with the best fit. And that's how it does it from his explanation, and so it's a you know, it's it's kind of a different way of programming than most of us are thinking about, like some kind of procedural if then statement is comparing these different massive amounts of data that it's gotten it's comparing that to what you're asking it to come up with

a question. But it's not really thinking, it's not really understanding. It's just kind of, you know, comparing this stuff and a very very fast rate. Is that in your understanding? Is that correct? Or? Am I? Am I wrong? Is there a better way to look at this? How would you describe that? Yeah? I think that's a pretty fair way to describe it. You know, it's basically taking a massive amount of data and looking for similar answers that have been rated, you know, highly

by previous users. And so you know, that's how it's It's taking information from past experiences and past responses and then saying, okay, well, based on this, it's a ninety nine percent match previous question. That person liked it, so I'm going to give that to you. Right, That's a very rudimentary way of thinking it. You know, the scale is massive, but you also have to remember, you know, AI is really in its infancy still, you know, and you think about everything that it can do

today. You know, in some ways, I guess what your your listener was asking, I would ask them in what regards, right, you know, if it's Google, Gemini's ability to generate an image off of a prompt. I would say it's an F because I'm not aware of a black pope ever being you know, in charge of the church, or you know,

an African American female being in charge of being a founding father. Yeah, so you know, I give them an F. But you know, for AI's ability to maybe identify underlying health risks and individuals, or being able to help synthesize a large amount of data into simple synopsis, I think that it

is a great tool. Yeah, right, And I think that you have to look at it not just as this one giant kind of instance, but you know, there are different use cases and I think ultimately the folks that are behind it and the ways that it's being implemented because it is just a tool, really help answer that question. I agree. Yeah, when you talk about something like, you know, the the racial misappropriation, I guess

we'd call it of Gemini. That was a wonderful thing for people to see because when you're talking about something that is political, something where they can put in a bias, they put it in and people need to be able to see that. And just one of those pictures is worth a thousand words, but they did thousands of pictures of that kind of nonsense, and I think people that's I think one of the most effective ways to show how they can

build bias into this. Now, when you're talking about something like building a circuit or doing some programming or something like that, they're not trying to build a bias into it yet. And so for those types of things it could be very, very useful. And if they didn't put that handpicked bias into some of this other stuff, it might be a lot more useful for those

other things. But people, so warning to people that be careful. Use this at your at your own risk, because especially when it comes into anything that is political, they are going to be inserting those biases. They pay people a lot of money to insert those biases and and and to you know, I guess weight a different set of answers, a different answer matrix or something to push that out out. And I'll get to that in a second.

But I think I just thought of one great example and how we use AI to benefit the individual, but if they elect to take advantage of it. We have a product called Liberation Campaign and it's an alternative to mail chimping constant contact for those that don't want to fight their email marketing platform to land

in the inbox. And so we have two different tools. One that looks at a subject line and one that looks at the actual content of your email, and it will say, hey, we know what Gmail is flagging, what their AI is flagging as spam and you know, putting down into the undelivered space or Yahoo and all those kind of things, and it says, hey, here's your score right, here's how you can improve it to get around Google and Yahoo's and Microsoft's spam filters. And so that I think is

a great example. And you know, it's one of those things it's unbiased, it's here's the data. You can use it, you cannot use it. I've heard from so many people though that are like, I'm hearing back from folks that I haven't heard from in over a decade or in you know, a year, five years, and so it's amazing that it's reaching their inbox and they're getting you know, forty fifty sixty percent open rates and all that, and they're like, I had no idea that a tool like this

existed. But you know, going back to what you were just saying, it's kind of I mean to say, it's kind of like electronic measures and encountermeasures and the encountercountermeasures. They're going to be a constant back and forth to try to stay on at one step ahead of their censoring algorithms. But that's that's really good. I like the fact that you're doing that because we know that they try to shut down our reach and sow many different places in so

many different ways. Yeah, we saw it with the RNC in twenty twenty two selection where their deliverability rates felt to about thirty percent. That means seventy percent of the folks that have signed up to receive their emails aren't getting any sort of information from them. I was speaking with another Christian group and they were just put on notice and pause. They were sending ten million emails a

month almost date, and they were put on notice. They weren't given a reason, they were just kind of told terms and conditions, and you know it went into you know, a long review process, and you know you have to look at that and really start to say, okay, well, if these technology companies have a bias and they're using AI which is able to detect flag and you know suspend without any sort of human intervention. You know,

how can that that impact our upcoming election? And you know, you look at Gemini being implemented into the entire Google ecosystem, so your email, your your Microsoft files or excuse me, your Google files, your YouTube, you know all these different things. Gemini is now integrated as of last week into everything. Wow. Right, and you started to think about it. There's over two billion people that visit that homepage every single day, right.

You know, if they start saying, well, if you're conservative, because we have access to your voting and political registrations, you know, we're gonna make it really hard for you to find your voting precinct. But if you're a Democrat, every time you log onto our homepage, we're going to say you haven't voted. Go vote, Go vote, go vote. Find your location it's right here. Why aren't you doing this, hey pop up reminder? You're driving by your polling location. You need to go and do this

right now. And you know they can do that. A guy We just had a guy who got a jail sentence because he did it as a joke. Oh, if you're a Democrat, make sure that you vote on Wednesday, or whatever, and there was a black woman. I guess, no problem because of Gemini. There's a black woman who did the same joke in the opposite direction. If you're Republican, don't forget to vote on Wednesday or

whatever. They sent him to jail. They gave her a pass. You know, you mentioned mail Chip and we started our experience with Mailchip with this show. Was I know him on the list? We started to put our we got an account, we set the thing up, we started loading in our contact list, and they shut us down even before we were able to do our first email. They shut us down. It's absolutely amazing the amount of censorship that is out there, the amount of profiling and information that is

out there already. But yeah, we can't even use it to start. Yeah, and then Google and Yahoo implemented new protocols as of February that are going to make it just easier and easier for their ais to flag people and

shut them down. You know, the idea that a New York Post article on Hunter Biden could get out in this upcoming election, you know, no one's going to even see it. It won't even reach the Internet or you know the conservative viewers, right, you know they're going to shut it down with the AI because they have a near one hundred percent success rate if they

decide to do something like that. And so you think about it. Back to the twenty twenty election, it was something like fourteen percent of surveyed Democrats said that if they would have known about that story and about the allocations, they would have never voted for Joe Biden. And so you look at it right there, that one action, that one suppression of a valid information.

You know, even though they labeled it misinformation. You know that that outcome was decided by Google and Twitter and those folks because those Democrats would not have voted Joe Biden, would not have one, and we would, I think,

be in a very different position you know today. Yeah, oh absolutely, Yeah, your your company is going to really be vital, I think in terms of getting around this because you know, we've had this competition and in the free market, what people say on social media was just too damaging for their professional journalists and everything. So why they began the massive censorship, the shadow banning, the canceling and and all the rest of the stuff that

we saw on social media. Yeah, and you know, when you think about social media. Like I agreed there, there shouldn't be blatant misinformation, right saying go vote on Wednesday when you know your your election day is on Tuesday. That that's not information we need out on the internet. Granted, you know, if someone does that, every one should be treated equally.

There should be a fair level of judgment on that. But at the same time, you know a lot of these technology companies are suppressing valid alternative informations, you know, the other side of the coin kind of concept where you know, you saw during COVID, you know there were Harvard and Stanford rated doctors that were saying or that we're getting completely censored, you know, and they were putting out peer reviewed data and they were just like, no,

that's misinformation. No, that's just an alternative view, and it's alternative opinion. And that's the whole concept that you know, our founding fathers laid out when they wrote the First Amendment, you know, the ability for each and every one of us to hear information and make our own informed decisions. Right, they're removing that ability for us to think critically, I believe. Yeah, they don't want any debate and they haven't wanted any debate on climate stuff.

They and we saw the same thing happened again with COVID. So you know, when we look at this, the interesting thing about all this is the fact that they have a monopoly and that they've been granted this the facto monopoly. But in many ways it's explicit, isn't it. And now, as I mentioned earlier, we've got Sam Altman and a lot of these companies. Because they do so much data scraping, they use these massive GPUs. That's why you know, this pattern matching has got to be super fast,

tremendous power requirements. You've now got these big data companies that are going out to they're creating their own power plants, their own nuclear power plants because they understand that our government is trying to shut down power generation. But they're going to be essentially allowed to have i think, a monopoly on power, electrical power, not just political power, and not just a monopoly on speaking. They're actually going to have a monopoly now I think on electric power generation if

they continue to shut down all of our different power stations. Yeah, and it's not surely it's actually a global issue. You know, in twenty twenty one, we slid, Singapore shut down, Ireland shut down twenty twenty two. I believe South Africa is shut down. You know, there are parts of the United States where they're just saying you can't build any more data centers because they are unable, you know, the local municipalities, the power companies,

they're not able to build power plants fast enough. You know, right now they only account for about fifty or excuse me, like three to five percent of power consumption here in the United States. But the way that they're starting to build these facilities with AI in mind and just larger and larger and

more ever consuming kind of concepts. You know, yeah, we're we're running out of power availability in the grid for new data centers, and so yeah, the you know, Microsoft is talking about building many miniature nuclear reactors next to their data centers. Yeah, you know, we have some really interesting things that you know, we'll have to come back on and share when it's officially public. But we're kind of going the opposite way. We're saying we

can actually do this more efficiently build and operate data centers. And it's by just looking at it through a slightly different lens and instead of us having to build giant nuclear reactors. We can actually operate unintentionally a more green operation because we just strip out all the wasteful components of a data center. Yeah. Yeah, it's this brute force aspect of it. And of course one of the ways they want to sell CBDC is to say, well, we're going

to use less power than the crypto stuff. Venezuela is concerned because with their small grid that they've got there. Even though they jumped on the cryptocurrency thing in twenty twenty, they just put out a thing saying that you're not we're banning cryptomning because it uses too much power. So some of these things are viewed by the regime as bad because it's a competition to their CBDC. Do not use a power for cryptocurrency. But yes, if you want to use

it to spy on people. If I wanted to keep a dossier on everybody in store everything that everybody's had, and do it in the desert, that's fine. They can use as much power and water as they want. And if these crypto companies want to do it will allow them to build whatever kind of power supply plant they want, and you know, we'll give them those kinds of powers, and we won't second guess their power generation plan. I mean, can you imagine the kind of permitting that anybody else would have to

go through. But I think they're going to sweep all that stuff away for Sam Altman and their friends and this crony capitalist society. I think yeah. And you know, it's just a we see the space doubling almost every two and a half years, which blows past you know, traditional economic models which say it should double every five years, and so you know, we are in this kind of interesting paradox. But at the same time, you know, there has to be a demand for all of that compute and all all

of that information that is being generated by these data centers. And so it's simply a matter of fact. You know, if you don't like what's going on, stop giving them your money. It's pretty pretty simple. They can't build massive data centers if you know, the population is starting to come back and saying, well, we don't want your AI in every single aspect of our lives, so we're going to go and do business elsewhere. Well, then the demand drops off, and then the financing drops off, and then

you know, they stop building these data centers. So you saw Amazon actually halt many of their projects over the course of the last two years because they saw that decrease in demand. And I think it's encouraging for us to look at the amount of impact that we can have when you look at the agenda to replace all internal combustion engines and to ban them, right, and we're going to make everybody drive an EV even though they don't have enough power or

to drive everything. Right. We have always said that to people. It's like, fine, I don't care what you drive. The government cares what you drive. And even if you get an EV, they're going to cut down the power grids so you won't be able to drive it, and they'll have you use it as a battery to back them up, that type of thing. But as we look at that, people are saying, well, you know, I've got issues with the range, I've got issues with the

expense. I can't really afford the expense. So the people were just not buying them for whatever reason. And so the marketplace has really in this one area that they have pushed so hard that they have subsidized trillions of dollars and they have wanted since I was in high school and they had the first Earth Day. They want to get rid of the private car, and they've pushed this agenda so much, and yet people have said, no, we're not

going to go any further. And the companies that were on board with all that because they just want to make money, they want to have the favor of the government, and so they were all on board with that, they were realizing that, hey, first of all, they're losing money and unbelievable amounts and it will be the end of the road for Ford and the rest of these Mercedes and the rest of these car companies if they decide that they

really want to compete on this ev with China, because China has been given all adult all the cards in terms of cheap energy, in terms of minerals that they have and Trump people. But you also still have you know, buildings falling over, sitting vacant in China. Just because China is doing it does not mean it's done well or done with a purpose. Right at the end of the day, what you're describing is capitalism one oh one. You know, I do still believe though, you know, diversification of your power

generation and everything like that. You know, if you want to slap a little turbine on your house, great, If you want to put a solar panel on top of your house, great. You know, I think that where it's I think it needs to be made available for the consumer to decide and free will. I don't think, you know, some of the aspects of green agenda are necessarily a bad thing. But I think where it's being,

when it's mandated, that's where it completely steps over the line. That's when it really infringes not only on our liberties, but the concept of capitalism as a whole. You know, diversification is never a bad thing having you know, electric cars for those that it suits them, right, you know, that is their decision. If you know, they just drive five miles up the road every single day and they're just putting it around. Great,

and ev is a great option for them, right. You know, it makes more of oil available for my vehicle, right, and more gasoline. So you know, I think that diversification is not a bad thing. I don't think that, you know, on many of these issues, there has to be a hard left or a hard right. You know, I think that, you know, the capitalistic model will always rain true, whether it's

in technology or automobiles and everything else. And so you know, that's what we're really trying to do at Liberation is create that diversification, you know, for folks that want to get off of Go to Idy, that want to get off of Google Cloud, that want to get off of Gmail and constant contact and mailchim you know, we've built a lot of those everyday tools so

that you know, you can make your own decision. You know, if you want there AI spying on your life and making every suggestion for you, great, yeah, but if not, you can come over to us. That's right. I agree. Yeah, Technology is a tool. It can be used good or bad. And if people got a choice, and if it's not centrally planned and centrally controlled, that's where the danger comes in. As you're pointing out, you know, the China poor construction, the building's

falling over. That's part of the the crony capitalism, the central planning and that type of thing, and it's what we see being pushed towards us in many aspects of our life. They don't want to have that diversification. It's like, well, if you want to have a gas range, no you can't have that you're going to have only what I say. You know, so we got our government is out are now trying to design things and push an agenda. I agree. You know, if you've got solar panels as

to get off of the grid, hey, that's super. It's going to be more expensive do that. But of course certain things like privacy and independence are going to come at a cost, and people can make that decision, and we should have access to a lot of different types of technology. It's the governments that want to dictate to us. You will have one solution,

and that's the only thing that you'll have. You know, that's what sign Being a former politico, being a former federal employees serving at the White House for four years, you know, you see all the time these folks come in and set unrealistic timelines, and so I think that's really what it is.

Right. You know, if if you were Gavin Newson and you're saying we're going to do one hundred percent electric in the state of California, then you need to be realistic, Okay by twenty four hundred, Well that's that's our goal, right, Like setting it out long enough so that you have time to build the infrastructure and everything like that, saying twenty thirty, they can't even finish an interstate in that amount of time, let alone an overhaul

of their entire electrical grid. So you know, it's the initiative is doomed before it even gets launched. That's a good news. The bad news is there's going to be an awful lot of wealth transferred to his pals, which that might be the actual goal and all that stuff anyway, So what can the average American do to protect themselves against this kind of surveillance. You've got some tools that you have there at Liberty. We've got a lot of great

tools. You know, we've got an option if you want to move your website, if you want to get an email with us, if you want to get off of Microsoft Teams or Google Workplace, store your video files, you know, replace zoom. We've got a lot of great tools there. And we've got an alternative to Mailchimp in constant contact to go Daddy, and Wix website builder. We've really focused on what does the everyday man need? And you know, where's zero knowledge. So we do not mind, monitor,

monetize anyone's information. But it's not just about what we're doing at Liberations. You know, go look at Freedom Chamber of Commerce, go look at Public Square, go look at Red Balloon. You know, there are all these different ways that you can pick an alternative in your day to day life.

And that's just good market competition. You know, almost being four years in since this movement really started, there are a lot of products and services out there now that are ideologically aligned with you know, the more conservative values, and you know, they're better or there I would oftentimes say equal or

sometimes even better than what we see coming out of Silicon Valley. And so if this matters to you, instead of you know, sitting there being upset about you know, the way that this nation is going and Google spying on you and all of that, take five minutes and sign up for an alternative right, start taking action and control of your life. Start, start taking the reins back, and don't let technology companies in the government make those decisions

for you. But that's great if you're happy with it, keep doing what you're doing. That is your own prerogative and decision. If you like being controlled and manipulated, that's fine. But we want to stand here as an alternative that will protect your ideology and your values. Yeah, it's usually it's coming from their angle. It's not that we're dissatisfied. They just don't like me. They shut me down. So I'm really happy that you're putting this

type of thing out there. I think it's very important. I think it's going to increasingly be spreading out to all kinds of people, even people that don't have a program they do on a regular basis. Years ago, we had George Gilder and he wrote a book Life After Google, and he said, you know, I think this whole model of Google and he called the people in Silicon Valley, called them neo Marxist, and he said, you

know, I think their whole business model is flawed. And he said, I think that there's going to be a marketplace for people who don't add privacy on as an afterthought. They don't put it on as a bag on the side. It is fundamental to the way the product is designed. Is that kind of your approach of what you're doing exactly? And you know, what

we're really trying to do is just restore common sense into the marketplace. Right, should we as a provider be spying and reselling your information without your real consent. Right, Yeah, we all accept the terms and conditions, but no one actually realizes what rights we're giving up there. So you know, those things and then they change them and here in the middle of yeah, you got to check the box and you don't read them. By the time

you would finish it, they would change it all over again. You know, those one hundred and two hundred page documents. And you know, I think that it's right. You know, we're just serving that alternative because you know, they are so big that they can be toppled without you know, much effort. Right. You take Google, They're making over one hundred and

fifty billion dollars annually off of data monetization. Right. If the US government comes in and says, hey, you can't just steal people's data and sell it to anyone anymore, well, they're going to really have to rethink their model, and they might have grown too large to support themselves. And so hypothetically the giant will tumble and it'll come down hard. Yeah. Yeah,

Yeah, it's a very dangerous thing that these people are putting together. The people that are pushing artificial intelligence, they're also pushing a universal basic income. They see that as integral to their success as they see the necessity for having their own nuclear power plant to run their GPUs and stuff like that. And

this is something that I've seen. I remember when Bloomberg was running for office, and I talked about this yesterday, so I won't go into detail on it, but he was talking about how, yeah, we have to have universal basic income. That's when he trashed the farmers and stuff. But he was talking about the agrarian versus the industrial revolution and he said, now the smart ones of us are trying to take everybody's jobs. And that's exactly what

Sam Altman is saying. And you've got in the UK. Jeffrey was a Jeffrey Hinton. I think they called him the Godfather of AI. I had not seen his name before, but he was there doing the same thing in the UK that Sam Altman is doing here, saying we've got to hook universal basic income in here because we were going to be intruding into so many different spaces that this is the way that we keep society from turning on us.

What do you think about that aspect of it, Well, I think that it goes back to the fact that you know, it is another tool and mechanism of control. Right, It's plain and simple. If we allow for them to continue to take more and more and you know, reduce the diversification in a space or in a market, you know that that's where things get

really hairy. And you know the next step, in my assumption, would be they just put AI in control of this entire government, right, And I'm sure the Democrats would love that because then they wouldn't have to listen to Joe Biden stumble through his speeches anymore. But you know, that is kind of the trajectory that they're trying to take us down. Where you know, would I be surprised in the next three to five years to hear Democrats calling

for AI to run many aspects of the government. No, I wouldn't be surprised that they do it before this election cycle is over. And and so you know, I think that's one thing we have to really be concerned about. You know, if they say, well, we can have objectivism, you know, you can have an objective judge and a jury, so we

just make the AI the judge and the jury, it's like WHOA. That's why people need to understand the bias and how easily it can be built in to the artificial intelligence I think, right, because any with the AI, the general information models that we have today, they're they're just large kind of guidelines, a lot of data, and then the bias that was built into it by the people that founded and constructed these models. You know, those are biases. The next step is, you know, it becomes a sentient,

self aware instance, and then we're in terminator land. So you know, you really have to wonder how far are we willing to go, how much of the genie are we allowing out of the bottle before we start saying okay, let's let's it takes some time reassess this, right. You know,

they want to implement AI so it can replace the workforce. I heard of one company who's massively integrating AI and they're reducing their workforce by about twenty percent annually, So in five years they're going to be down to an absolute

skeleton crew. And then yeah, that universal basic income becomes a requirement because it's now welfare because no one is employed because AI has been integrated strictly for profits into every single business, and many of the entry level and mid level jobs have been just completely replaced as a massive wealth transfer, and in order for them to do that, they have to make us dependent on them. And so you're right, it is welfare. And that's the problem with all

kinds of welfare. It always is masked as if it were compassion, but it's always ultimately about dependency and creating that making people helpless and dependent on the government, and you lose your skills to be able to feed yourself. You know, it's kind of a feeding people by hand, the same way that

you would tame a wild animal. Yeah, you know, And you think about you know, universal basic income, and I would question your listeners to really explain, how does it really different differ from the ideology of Lenin and Stalin's communism where everyone is equal, everyone is taken care of, everyone gets gets you know, money and the profits and rewards of the economy, and

so from that concept, how is it really different? And then remind me again, you know, the USS foul or USSR fell because it ran out of money because the oligarchs took everything consolidated, created a population that could barely afford to feed themselves. Agree, and yeah, it's failed time and time again. You know, Slapping lipstick on a pig does not make it a new concept. It's just it's just, you know, the same pieces of

history repeating themselves over and over again, just under a new name. I agree, Yeah, that was part of that was really actually the reason why George Gilder called them the neo Marxist. He said, Carl Marx believed with the Industrial Revolution that they had infinite material capacity. They could manufacture anything that they wanted to. So the only thing that was left was how do we distribute this? Right, that's why you have the redistribution of wealth at the

center of it all. And he said, and that's the conceit of these people in Silicon Valley. They believe that they have unlimited material resources, that they can manufacture anything, and all they have to do is figure out how to reallocate that. But their goal is in order to pacify us so they can continue on with their game. And that's the thing that is really different

about it that we hadn't seen in America prior. You know, Henry Ford, with all of his pluses and his minus says one of the things he said was I want to make a car that people work in the factory can afford to buy. Well, they don't want to have people around, and they're not interested in selling cars to their robots. You know, they just want to get us out of the way, and they will do whatever they

can. And it's interesting because I would ask the tens of thousands of employees that have been laid off by Google, by Tesla, by Amazon, by you know, all these other Silicon valleys, Now, how do you really feel about that? How's that working out for you? Because now they are beginning to consume their own and so I think that to your point, the

system will fall because it has lost core principles in morals. Yes, and now they are just trying to constantly figure out how they make a greater profit year over year instead of how do you create a great product, a great company that is here to serve your customers and become sustainable, right and being able to take care of your employees and provide them the lifestyles and the American treat So, you know, I think that it is a disconnection from the

American dream, you know, the principles of the founding fathers and God given liberties. And you know, I think that at the end of the day, just as history has shown us, those systems will always topple. Yes. Yes, and they're anti human, they're anti freedom, they're anti human, and I believe that they will fail as people wake up. Our job is to wake them up, the sooner the better, so at least amount of damage. Amen. Again, your company is Liberation Tech. Is that

correct? T e K. Yeah, it's liberation Our website is liberation Tek liberation tech dot com. Great. Great, Yeah, we'll be checking that out because we've been heavily censored here and getting kind of tired of it. I've been tired of it for the last six years that's been going on out alone. Yeah, so as is wonderful that people are going to use tools to get around these tools of censorship and control. I'm so excited to see what you've got there. Thank you so much, Andrew, Andrew Ridda.

Is that the way you said to it? Okay, great, Andrew Ridda, And the company is Information Tech t EQ, Liberation Tech. I'm sorry, Liberation Tech t e K dot com, Liberation t e K dot com. Thank you so much for joining us. Appreciate it. Thanks Travis, Thank you. Have a good day. All right, let's talk a little bit about in just a moment that we've got here, we have the Bricks group has come up with something that is going to be their new currency.

They call it the Unit. The Unit. How doesn't that sound generically threatening dystopian? The unit offers an a political form of money that is not influenced by any political agenda. The unit can be used as a currency for payments via any open payment clearing system. The unit can freely be bought, sold, and used. Currency is worldwide. The unit is operates on a decentralized

network. Well, all that is great, and that's a response to Biden politicizing the money, the swift situation, trying to politicize a transfer currency. Understand that, But you know, all of those different things can apply to gold, can't they the gold or silver instead of the unit. You could have a political form of money gold that does not influenced by political agendas,

that can be used as currency for payments. You have to And as an addition to all this stuff, it is completely not only decentralized, but it is completely private. And I think we all need to be thinking about how

we get outside of the system, including the Bricks Unit. And that's one of the reasons why I think when you look at preparing for the future, understand that it's not just inflation, but it is also making sure that you've got skills, that you can grow your food, that you've got access to water, that you've got a community. And then for financial privacy and freedom, gold and silver. If you go to David Knight dot gold, I'll take you to Tony Rdban Why's wolf Gold and he can get gold or silver

for you small or large quantities. You can gradually accumulate it as a savings program with wolf Pack, and he's got a lot of different levels that you can get into with that. So again, gold and silver one of the best ways that you can prepare for independence and freedom, and you can get there with David Knight dot Gold and let Tony know that you came through us on rock Fan Michelle Obama, thank you for the tip, said Epic Show for a legendary chat. Well, thank you. I really do like what

Andrew is doing. I hope that I wish him luck and I hope that it's successful because we really do need this, and I think it's important to fight technology with technology and not just necessarily opt out. There's places where we can op out there's places where we need to fight him directly, and that's what he's doing. Thank you for joining. Let me tell you the David Night Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that

means you're listening to the David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else, You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.