Tue Episode #2258: War by Lie, Policy by Deception

And what are we talking about. You know, we're talking about war, famine, pestilence with his genetic code injection. It wasn't COVID. COVID was not the pestilence. It was the vaccine that he unleashed, and the famine as well as the byproduct of the war that he's doing. All these things together they add up to the fourth horseman of the apocalypse. That's the death. This is what Trump is truly about. But let's begin with his latest lie of the day.

with something. They're not even going to try to go in and say, yeah, but if you look at it from this way, then maybe I can interpret it to say no, they just come out with the bowl faced lie. They don't care what you've seen. Don't believe you're lying. Eyes believe you're lying. Politicians. It's the bottom line. Well, of course, if we go back and we look at yesterday was the also the met gale, I think last night, so all these people are wearing their weird outfits and

some people were trolling Trump. So here's Trump at the Met the gala of the strange outfits that they have, and they've.

And so the question is what is really happening with this is somebody that was very close to the four of them as well, and this couple and the couple broke up, and the guy is a real sleazy character, and he is now an ambassador. Forget what country he

was in. I'm not going to go into a lot of detail about it, but he's now been made ambassador by Trump and he wound up getting Trump to send in his ice schoons in the middle of the night to arrest his former wife and deeporter from the country she's talking, Oh is Italy?

Of course, the other part of it is you know, two hundred million dollars from one Israeli donor to do whatever they say. And when you look at what Trump is doing in terms of this back and forth of the peace proposal, regardless of what he asked to say, well, we're going to have them make a bad deal. I'm not even going to look at the deal. I did look at the deal. Back and forth. You never know what this guy is going to say. But the reality

is is that he got the deal. He did look at the deal, and then he said he's going to not go with the deal. And he said that he went to an Israeli a newspaper to give them an interview to tell them that, because that's what they want to hear. And they're the ones who are giving him money. So yeah, maybe we're better off not making a deal.

As a matter of fact, Yeah, he wrongly claimed that he had been speaking in jest and exaggerating when he promised during his twenty twenty four campaign to immediately end the war in Ukraine if elected again.

up about Hillary Clinton. You and I have heard him say that multiple times when he was running. He had done so multiple occasions and televised rallies attended by thousands of people. I remember Joe Biggs and he had a Hillary for Prison T shirt and he went to one of the one of the rallies and he stood up in front and he opened up his shirt to sell it, and Trump's like, yeah, we'll lock her up, And I was like, I said it all the time, That's why I did the T shirt.

who do the jerry mandering. Is rigged by the parties who make sure that independence and third parties can't get on the ballot, and they choose who their candidates are going to be, and they make sure that but only the people that they choose are allowed to participate in debates. It's rigged in so many different ways. There was nothing new about that whatsoever. And so yeah, he's he's out there and he's saying that we have to you know, it's either threatening them again.

they want with it. But they are giving it. Let's say to Ukraine and it's.

our economic activity. And that's what they're really doing. But of course, you know he's penny wise, but he's foolishly pounding the world with bombs and then complaining about the fact that we can't build these things quickly enough. As a matter of fact, when you look at what it's going to take, it's going to take many, many years to replenish all the stuff that we spent to protect Israel.

And it's not even about protecting Israel. For thirty five years, you had Netnyahu telling people that nuclear bomb was imminent coming from Iran. That was a lie. We saw him lie about that over and over again. You know, it's only going to be just a short period of time, and it's just a matter of months, maybe a year or two. He's been saying that for thirty five years. And the reality is is that there was no eminent threat.

We heard played the cliff for you yesterday. Heg Seth as he was asked and said, well, no, we you know, did you bomb their nuclear Oh yeah, we covered it. We nuked that thing. You know, didn't say nuked it, but you know we turned it into dust. There was nothing there. Well, wait a minute, you just said that there was an eminent threat that we had to defend against. There was no eminent threat to the US, not even to Israel. Israel has superior conventional wisdom weapons and they

have nuclear weapons as well. This was about the greater Israel project. This is about destroying the Middle East so they can take it over like they did Gaza. Let's understand what is truly the basis of this. And so as Trump rejects any peace proposal from Iran, he goes to Israel's con news on said no, this is unacceptable to me. You'll be happy to know I'm going to continue your war, you know. Mark Levin tells people, Oh,

they saying that he did it for Israel. But they got to say to this and it's like Trump has said it, Rubio has said it. We're supposed to not see that. According to Mark Levin, really so Trump rejects the Iranian Peace Office offer. Neither party appears to be willing to budge, says our T, speaking to Israel's con News on Sunday. He considers it, he says unacceptable. He said, Iran has not yet paid a big enough price for what they have done to humanity and to the world

over the last forty seven years. What have they done? You want to you want to mention that? And let's eighty six. This forty seven nonsense, okay, once and for all. I mean, come on, forty seven years ago, what they do they took over the USM. They do anything to humanity in the world with that, No, even if that was unprovoked, but it was provoked by about twenty five years worth of American attacks on them, going back to nineteen fifty three, putting in the Shaw and his secret

police and training them to be brutal and ruthless. That was the crime against Iran, not against even humanity in the world. But this is about the US and Iran in our history, and our history doesn't start forty seven years ago, it starts seventy three years ago. So US lawmakers are stepping up their efforts, says RTE, to strip Trump of authority over the Iran war. Are they I

don't see them doing anything over this. I mean, it's just been nothing but prevarications and procrastinations is what we've seen the Congress do. Despite a ceasefire, which has been in place since early April, the US continues to enforce a naval block on Irani imports. While Iran has restricted traffic through the Straight of Hor moves the Strategic Waterway has been effectively closed as a result. Yeah, they'll say, well, you had two or three ships get through or something.

That used to be about one hundred and fifty a day, now it's two or three a day. Democrat and Republican lawmakers are increasingly questioning the administration's strategy. Strategy Do they have one? I think the strategy is only endless war to Gaza side the entire Middle East for Israel. Trump's claimed that the Iran conflict has been terminated fuels a dispute. Say this is the other big lie. You know, we didn't do a show on Friday. We had recorded interviews,

but that was really the lie of the day. What you had all of Congress saying, well, you know, they have a ceasefire, so the clock stops, or we can extend it another thirty days to get the troops out of harm's way that they put into harm's way. And of course the War Powers Act doesn't give the president the authority to start a war. It gives him the authority to react to a war for sixty days without

having to get a congressional declaration. But nothing legally or morally authorizes a war of choice, a war of aggression.

only thing necessary for evil to triumph. Is for why I wouldn't even say good men, I would say for the GOP men to do nothing. They do nothing about Epstein, They do nothing about the war. According to Trump, he stayed within the sixty day limit during the war against Iran, therefore has not violated the law governing the use of force and overseas conflicts. Yeah, you know, he said, at one point in time, you're going to be so tired

of winning, You're going to say, let's let's not win anymore. Well, I think what he really meant to say was, you're going to be so tired of my lying, You're going to say, please stop lying to me. We all know you're a liar, and we've established that over and over again. Why bother with the effort. We don't believe a thing he has to say right now. And then you get to Chuck Schumer. Trump is even making Chuck Schumer look good because Trump Chuck told the truth about Trump Chuck

versus Chump. He said, this is all nonsense. He said, this is an illegal war, and everyday Republicans remain complicit and allow it to continue as another day that lives are endangered, chaos erupts, prices increase, while Americans foot the bill, vote for us, so we can do the same thing. That's the reality. They don't want to stop. This is just part ofsan opposition. They're not really opposed to chaos.

They're not opposed to lives being endangered. They're not opposed to price increases, tax increases, and sticking Americans with the bill. They're not opposed to any of that. So we're going a ceasefire right now, said Hegseth, which in our understanding means the sixty day clock pauses or stops. I don't know that Hegseth has any understanding. I think he doesn't understand any of this stuff. He just says what Trump

tells him to say. I do not believe the statute would support that, said Senator Kine, citing serious constitutional concerns. Constitutional concerns come on. The Constitution is obviously a dead letter that has been burned and buried long ago. As a matter of fact, there's a great article on mesas talking about the fact that we are in the version number four of America. We got rid of the constant

a long long time ago. I think it's still worth talking about it because I think it's still a great framework, and I think that it highlights the fact that these people who rule us have no legitimate authority. They are tyrants. They have a lot of power, but they have no authority, and we always need to make that distinction. That's why I talk about the Constitution. They don't care about it's all.

As a matter of fact, as I point out at the beginning of the program, they're very busy writing a brand new constitution for a police state, and they've got a lot of new laws that are going to be the basis to use this disruptive technology to disrupt our lives and to turn our society into a permission based society where the police surveil and track everything that we do. Yeah, that is what they're working on right now. So Mike Johnson backed access few. Well, of course he does, because

they're post sycophants. He says, we're not at war. We are policing the Strait of Hormuz. Oh so it's a police action, it's not a war. Yeah, we heard that from Democrat Harry Truman, didn't we But the Korean War, Notice, nobody ever says the Korean police action. Everybody knew it was a war. Everybody knew Truman was lying. He was the guy who basically put in place the National Security State. He created the NSA by executive order. He promulgated the CIA and all the rest of this stuff as well,

and he started creating the national security state. The America is the world's policeman. Or we do whatever we want anywhere, and we don't ever declare war. We forget about the Constitution. And so that's where Mike Johnson is now. As I said, the Republicans of today the Democrats of my youth. The Democrats of today are the Marxists of my youth, and they're both pushing us towards a new thing, a technocracy. Well,

you know, it was kind of interesting. Well, Mike Johnson as they're talking about passing FAIZA and how it was necessary to do that, and when he was talking about what Ice is doing in various places, you know, he complains about the fact the absurdity that we would ever think that you should have search warrants.

after having demanded that it be removed. And he gets in power, and it's like, oh, I like the ring of power feels good when I put it on my finger, and so now he wants it not removed, but he wants it extended for one half years. Then they wind up extending it for three years thanks to that guy. He says, we can't bother with warrants. Let me tell you something. The Bill of Rights is there to protect

our God given rights. And if we are going to allow the government to expedite things for its own purposes, then we wind up with no rights whatsoever. The Bill of Rights was there designed as an impediment to what these people are doing. We don't want to make it easy for them to do that. And of course the flip side of that is that you're going to have some if you go with due process and you have strict rules about how the government can accuse and try

and punish people. If you have those strict rules, guess what you're going to have some people who are really guilty, who are going to go through are going to use those rules, game them, gain the system, and get away with it. And if you react to that by saying, well, we're going to get rid of those restrictions on government because I want all the criminals to be punished, that's still not going to happen.

That is the most dangerous scenario. We don't live in a perfect world, and so criminals are going to get away with stuff, and the criminals will get away with stuff. If you have the government coming after everybody else, they still will get away with it. It'll be the innocent people who get caught up in this stuff. If somebody is a criminal, they're going to be gaming this system.

They're coming in offensively with this kind of thing. But if we get rid of the things that are there, the very foundation of the basis of our government, as the Declaration of Independence, which you're going to celebrate the two hundred and fifteen anniversary of it this year, the very basis for setting up the American government was that government was there to protect our god given rights, and

it wasn't about safety. It was about protecting our god given rights and making sure that government doesn't become the biggest destructor of those rights, because that's what it always tends to do. Because power corrupts, and absolute power corupts. Absolutely we know that.

sea change. This is why the Republicans, rather than adjusting their policy to put Americans first, rather than adjusting their policy to start trying to follow the Constitution or follow the Bill Rights Framework, what they've done is they've doubled down on gaming the system. The Republicans are looking at the midterms and they're saying, well, you know what.

this stuff. Both parties are gaming the system rather than listening to the people. They don't care what we want as long as they can rig the elections. So you've got a couple of Republicans who have broken with Trump publicly in the Senate, really only Ran Paul, but Susan Collins is saying and Lisa Murkowski are saying they might break with him because they're living in states that are predominantly Democrat, and so they don't want to be seen as being too close to Trump. But it mays be

seen they'll actually grow a spine and oppose him. Meanwhile, as Reason magazine points out, there are civilians across the Middle East. They said, when we look at this war, how they're affected. And they looked at people from Iran, from Israel, from Lebanon, from Kuwait and Dubai and all these different places. They said, there is a fear that settles in your heart. As one Iranian woman texted to her American relative. She said, now they're hitting everything. Nowhere

is safe. Think about that. Think about not only the corrupt and moral way, illegal, way, unconstitutional way this war began, but think about the immorality of how it's conducted, not only initiating a war of aggression, but deliberately targeting civilians. And Trump has said this over and over again, We'll wipe out their entire civilization. Where's he getting these kinds of ideas from Netanyahu, who's done it already?

typically troops who were sent to fight far away. War in your hometown is a strange experience, especially a modern air war without front lines. Things you take for granted, from electricity to the freedom to go outside disappear. Life's soundtrack becomes sirens and explosions. The danger feels distant until it isn't. Death comes seemingly at random. Let me just say that Americans have been blessed to follow God and have a legacy of that God has blessed with peace

here in America. When we continue to do these immoral acts, we are storing up wrath not only from God but also from the people that we're attacking without justification. These chickens are going to come home to roost. This wrath that we have been storing up, these sowing end of this whirlwind, Well, that whirlwind is going to come for

us one day. And as you see technology changing, you see hypersonic missiles, as you see nuclear cruise missiles, nuclear in the sense that they are nuclear powered and can stay in the air indefinitely. As you see all these different changes in warfare, you see the changes in artificial intelligence.

is really surprise attack. Missiles hit the elementary school that we all know about in Monab and also in a gym two towns on the Iranian coast. This person that they interviewed here Reason magazine had a daughter that was in the high school volleyball team practicing at the gym. He rushed over when a neighbor told him about the attack. He said the injuries. The injured people were bleeding heavily, some had lost consciousness on the ground. Others were screaming

without stopping. He said, the voices were deafening, and he found that his daughter had died. Since dun Wars touched almost every corner of the Middle East and has spoke to civilians from all sides of the conflict. And I'm not going to go into all the details about this. It's horrible enough. Meanwhile, we look at what is coming. As I said at the beginning of the program, Trump has been a one man fourth turning global depression as well as global war.

could cause a silent collapse of the global fertilizer trait. Yeah, we've talked about this from the very beginning, not only the ability to grow food with the fertilizer that so many people depend on, but also and it's the kind of food, the big massive agricultural grains and things like that that are kind of the foundation not necessarily what is good for U steep, but what we do eat.

But also when you look at the foundations for other things, you know, plastics as well as microprocessors and the helium that is needed for that. There's so many different things, not just energy, but energy is fundamental but also affects fertilizer, helium and many other things are necessary ingredients for the kinds of products that have become the staples of our lives, and Trump is destroying all of that. So he's been warning people to stop looking at the oil tickers and

start looking at the soil. He believes the world is sleepwalking into a massive multi year famine, being slow walked by the silent collapse of the global fertilizer trade as a byproduct of this Trump war. I foresee a very big increase in the famine across the world by the fall of twenty twenty six and twenty twenty seven, he said.

And so he said, whenever you see these types of things that we're seeing, disruptions and global trade, they will ripple into higher prices, into lower output, and they will hit the poorest countries the hardest. So those of us who still have food in the West will be paying a lot more for it those and some poor countries won't have it at all. That's going to be Trump's legacy, And of course his number one priority and getting in in this second term, has been to disrupt global trade.

Stop and think about it. Everything the man has done from day one has been to disrupt global trade, and that is going to have massive consequences in every area of our life. He began his second term with war, with sanctions, with tariffs and all this sort of stuff, threatening other countries, threatening Canada, threatening Greenland. I mean, the man is insane. I don't care how old he is. I don't care if he can't remember what he had

for breakfast this morning. He is fundamentally insane and belligerent, and he needs to be removed. Trump defense proposal is going to as I've said so many times, they hit a record level over trillion dollars, and immediately he and warpeat. You're still calling him a war pig. I want to go another fifty percent over what was a record.

you know, same type of stuff. Jerald Clinty says, you know, trillions for war, not a penny for peace, and that's what he's saying. He said, we choose not to feed people, we choose not to build, we choose mayhem. We are led by people who like to be warriors. And we've never seen this kind of hubris from our leaders about war ever in the past that we see Trump and from warpig. So again, what does it mean for us?

You know, I've talked many times about the welfare magnet, What about the famine magnet? What if Trump steps that up? As people pointed out, all these wars that we do, they usually wind up stoking immigration into our countries. This is going to be even worse. Everything the man does is contradictory to what he says he wants to see happen. Iron fires in the US warship and straight of horm moves yesterday after Trump announced plans to guide the ships

through the Straight of hor Moves. But you know, at the same time he's saying the war is over, he is he is such a liar. He needs to have two faces because saying one thing and then immediately saying the other, they sink six small running boats. As Trump warns, the regime could be quote blown off the face of the earth. But remember, the war's over, and he is the peace president right now. He is the liar and thief, not the commander in chief. So now he has renamed

his operation Epstein Fury. He's now got a new name for it, because you have to have a different war, right, that war is over. So let's start the clock again. Sixty days on Project Freedom, that's what he's calling it. Yeah, we are beyond freedom and dignity, folks. It is a pure si op of skinnerresque proportions here. Yeah, a different war right, Project Freedom. So the Peace President said, we have more weapons and ammunition at a much higher grade

than we had before you heard him say that. Earlier he said, we have the best equipment. We have the best stuff all over the world. We have bases all over the world. They're all stocked up with equipment. We can use all that stuff, and we will if we need it. And by the way, we don't have any money left over to pave the roads or do anything else. The government says that it's really there to build, you know, and that's not a purpose of the US government anyway,

building infrastructure. But nevertheless they taxes to say that that's what they're going to do. But instead they have bases all over.

After what we started. There are hundreds of ships from about eighty seven countries that are stuck in the Persian Gulf. And as I said before, usually it's about one hundred and fifty or so a day. But they got stuck there because it was a surprise attack. We didn't tell anybody. We didn't tell our NATO allies because we only have one ally that matters, and that's the Zionist Israelis. Yeah, they knew they were the ones who did it, and

we did it back them up. As their a Hedge article points out, I said it, you know, from the Venezuelan thing with pirates of the Caribbean.

forgot what this is all about. And yet you have Mark Levin who is raging about doesn't anybody remember the Holocaust? Yeah, we do, and you can't forget because you're trying to reenact it.

have ended hostilities. Of course he's lying about that. Then on May third, he creates a new thing called Project Freedom, which is announced as a humanitarian operation, not as a war and not as a military operation. And then on Monday, the US Navy escorts neutral ships through there, and it all starts again, starts up again. Well, he thinks that is pure genius and a savvy legal move. No, it's

just lies, per varications and hubris. To say this is give us a bull faced lie, do something that he knows and we know is against the law, and then dare people to stop him. He dares people to stop him. The deeper problem remains that both sides believe that they have won. Washington points the destruction of much of Iran's navy and air force and of its missile launching capacity. Well, the problem is that's obviously not true, and they just showed that yesterday as well. So they have not stopped

their missile launching capacity Iran. Meanwhile, from their standpoint, they think they're winning because they survived a campaign that was widely seen as trying to create a regime collapse. And the regime has not collapsed, and we haven't taken away the missiles either, And they have also then demonstrated their ability to strike across the Gulf and into Israel with the missiles that Trump and Hexas said they don't have anymore, and it has shown that it can place the global

economy into a chokehold. And so when you're talking about this, you know, Trump has been putting out these memes of him holding Uno cards and saying we got all the cards, We got all the cards. Well, this is a guy who held all the cards when he owned the casinos, and he still failed. They still went bankrupt, And even having all the cards and setting all the casino rules, this guy still couldn't win. And so, as zero Hedge

points out, on either side is holding a strong card. Yeah, both of them believe that time is on their side, it might look like a manageable situation where it not for the oil markets losing roughly ten million barrels a day with inventories now running uncomfortably low. That's putting it moderly. Trump is facing a binary choice. He can pursue genuine diplomacy. Nah, I'm not gonna do that secure the outcome that he wants. But that path would provoke resistance from Israel and from

hawks in Washington. Well, doesn't that tell us who wants this war? Who we're fighting for just as much? I mean, we have the confessions from Rubio and from Trump. Maybe Mark Levin should look at those, but we also know that these people are keeping him in it.

not do. Everything about this is a lie. And as I said before, this guy, and I think it was what his son in law, I think was the one who was taking Jonathan Pollard around to Mike Huckabee, mark Levin's son in law, and Mark Levin and Jonathan Pollard have been pushing nuclear war, nuclear war, nuclear war with Trump to have Israel use it or to have the US do it. That's a total victory. Means for these guys. Well, you know, when we look at Trump, he is just pathetic.

You know, as you look at yesterday, they're putting out the White Houses, putting out these garbage memes. Here's one of them. Here, look at that Trump in a suit of armor, dressed up like the Mandalorian. Give me a break.

to reality. And when he puts out memes that are blasphemous. Actually he put this, he retweeted this. One person said they're persecuting Trump more than they persecuted him. And they show a picture of a representation of Christ on the cross, and what they do is they change his face to Donald Trump, this is sick, sick, idolatry. I am sick of these maga people. Just I'm not going to cut a mansic. And so somebody pointed out, well, they keep

putting out these memes. You know, there's Trump with these eagles behind him and his big gun biceps and everything, and a wife beater shirt exposes his arms and shoulders. They said, but this is the reality on the left side. Yeah, he's a seventy eight year old man and there he is, without his orange makeup and all the rest of that stuff.

This weekend, Trump said that he will raise its Section two thirty two terrafts on European car imports back to twenty five percent from what was agreed upon just you know, a couple of months ago. They agreed that it would be fifteen percent when they did the Turnbury deal. Now he's just arbitrarily taking it up to twenty five percent. This, folks, is why we have the restrictions. We don't want to allow one person to set tax rates or terras rates

because terris oar taxes. We don't want one person to be able to drag us into war because when you look at what Trump is doing, he is a one man destruction team. And it's because the Congress, especially the Republican Party, has just given him the keys to everything. Do whatever you want. There's no restrictions on anything that you want to do. The Founders created a framework where you don't allow all power to reside in one person.

Trump wants it is people want it for him. The Republican politicians wanted for him, and he's bragged about it. I'm going to be a dictator, but I'll be a good dictator, and I'm going to do it for a few days. And he's done it. He continues to do it. He's never going to stop underlining how little its own deals constrain it. Now we're talking about the Trump regime, is it okay? It's about this guy, this guy who is a liar, a thief, a trader to his family, to his wives, as well as to his country. I

said that about him to begin with. I said, the man is faithless to his promises to his wife in a way that we typically don't see it. I said that before when he was running in the primaries. I said, you know, you look at the pride parades and it was kind of interesting because most of the time people are not proud of their sin, but they were with their gay pride parades. But I said, you know, you don't typically have parades where people parade. You don't have

an adultery pride parade, right unless you're Donald Trump. If you're Donald Trump, you do make a parade out of your adultery. You do make a parade out of kicking your wife to the curb, which is what he did. And of course they did a movie about that, The First Wives Club, which was a dig at Donald Trump.

It has a list of ninety three billion euros and retaliatory tariffs that were suspended after Turnberry. So if Trump is going to then ignore that deal and say, well, instead of fifteen percent, we're going to jump it up to twenty five percent because he didn't like something somebody said about him or to him, they've got weapons that

they could use as well. It also has the anti coercion instrument, the so called trade Bazouka, which allows restrictions on US investment, even the withdrawal of intellectual property protection. So the question is whether Europe is willing to follow China's lead on this. But again, Trump's sanctions and his tariffs were and remain acts of war. He can't be trusted with a treaty. He can't be trusted to negotiate in good faith, and this is why this war is

going to continue to drag on. The Iranians aren't fools. They understand that. They said, why would we bother to even talk to this guy? We can't believe anything they say as we're talking to them. They're doing the Israeli trick of the Judai mind, trick of let's have some negotiations. Meanwhile, they assassinate the negotiators. They use that as an opportunity to do a sneak attack. So Trump is withdrawing five thousand troops from Germany, part of the thirty seven thousand

that are still stationed there. So he's taking it down by about twelve and a half percent, right about one eighth or whatever. But the reality is is that even though Trump wants an empire, even though he wants to be the only power around, when he pulls troops out of Germany, as a zero Hedges pointing out, he basically is working against what he wants. I'm glad to see

the troops coming out. I don't want to see America be an empire, but he does, and he appears to see these forces that are there mainly to protect Germany. In reality, though the bases exist to allow the US to project power into Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, their removal would weaken America's strategic reach. It would weaken the empire. So I think that's a good thing, but it's not what he wants to do. He doesn't want to week in his empire, but his actions are doing it.

He's a fool. He's not just a traitor. He's not you know, he's not a genius by any sense of the word. Well, we're going to take a quick break because I want to move on to this other stuff. And I spend enough time on on war. I could spend the entire program on it if I let myself.

it and its origins and where it came from. But whenever you look, whenever you got an error, it always has real consequences. And now what we're seeing is that this dispensationalism has been has metastasized into support for Zionism, which the two of them are completely different things. Of course, dispensationalism is a framework for which people use to try

to understand the Bible. I disagree with that framework. But now what has happened is that it puts so much emphasis on Israel that it removes that emphasis from Christ and it's resulting in an idolatry of a political state. That's what Zionism is about. So you can't even criticize that political state without now being charged with being anti

Semitic or racist or whatever. But the real issue with this is that it is idolatry and it is focused on It misrepresents Christ's work, it misrepresents who the chosen people of God are. The chosen people are not determined by genealogy. That was clear made very clear in the New Testament. It's the people of faith who are God's chosen people. And faith and what faith and who faith

in Christ. That's what makes people God's chosen people. And so it is a misdirection that is having some really horrible fruit, even in politics and war, but it has had horrible spiritual fruit as well. So, Yeah, unfortunately, I'm familiar with it. Yes, we're all a little bit too familiar with it.

And of course, you know, we keep being reminded. As I played the clips yesterday, Ben Shapiro said, Hey, we need these h one B people because you Americans just aren't good enough, and we're going to come and take your country away from you, just like we've done in so many other places. And if you can't afford to live here, maybe you should go somewhere else. We've got to get over this notion just because you were born in America that you have any birthright to be here.

This actually belongs to Ben Shapiro and his pals, and they're gonna make sure you understand that I have nothing but contempt for these globalists to come here from other countries whose loyalty is not to America. They despise Americans, and they despise the principles this country was built on. People like Mark Levan exhibit A. This guy, and he always talks about liberty, liberty, liberty. He's not about liberty at all. He is a lying killer for another country.

on a daily basis. They're using this new disruptive technology to disrupt our constitution, disrupt our liberty, as our freedom and our dignity and to make us if we're going to participate in these new technologies, we're going to have to do all kinds of jump through, all kinds of identification hoops and anonymity and all.

to get. The framing is supposedly to protect children, as they always do, right, But the result is going to be age verification, digital ID for everyone, a permission society, and we'll get rid of cash and all the rest of this stuff as well. So what it means is that you're going to have to have a government ID or have to upload a facial scan or some other kind of biometric information, are a financial record that is tied to your legal name in order for you to

use artificial intelligence. We've seen this happening over and over again. Social media was the first one. Then they're talking about operating systems and things like that. Now artificial intelligence, all of it, every user of every covered chat pot, we need to hand one of those over before being allowed in. And look, we understand how dangerous AI psychosis can be. We were just talking the other day about Richard Dawkins, an adult, a guy who purports to be a scientist,

although I never believed that he was a scientist. The Dawkins delusion of saying that he's got science on this side, when science is actually disproving what he is saying, science and math. But nevertheless, you got everybody from Richard Dawkins to young kids who are being taken in by AI and think that it is it is something that is

sentient and conscious, conscious and so forth. And so I understand what the danger is, but there are other ways to approach this, and it's clearly a mcguffin that is happening here. We see that, you know, they identify a real problem or they make up an imaginary problem. But the bottom line is is that they're always using these problems, real or imagined for their same end.

It's all about total control, and they're all always come up with some kind of an emergency, some kind you know, which is what Trump is always doing. Well, we got an emergency reel or imagined, so now I've got the ability to issue executive orders and act like a king. No, but this is what they're both doing, bipartisan Democrats and Republicans.

The bill defines an artificial intelligence chat bot as any service that produces new, expressive content or responses that are not fully predetermined by the developer or operator, and that accepts open ended, natural language or multimodal user input. This reaches, however, way beyond the idea of just a chatbot. You will also cover service bots, search assistance powered by AI, homework helpers general purpose tools millions of adults already used without

proving who they are. So by the kind of language that they have here, it is by extension, going to have a massive reach. And I'm going to give you an example of this and how this actually works against efforts to protect kids. Senator Richard Blumenthal signed on the bill, along with Senators Mark Warner, Chris Murphy, Katie Britt and

Mark Kelly. So again we see some of the most conservatives as well as some of the most liberal people signing onto this because this is a bipartisan mcguffin to turn us into a permission society for the purposes of surveillance and a police state. The bill includes data minimization and language. It also requires periodic reverification, which means that you'll have to go through this process even after you're told them, You'll have to go through the process again

and again. So want to just be a one time process. All of these options are surveillance infrastructure, as we claim. The Net points out, they say they want to safeguard Americans' most secured documents. Well, if you want to do that, you need to reject this guard Act. It would force AI companies to collect and to store highly sensitive personal data into honeypots that are ripe for cyber criminals to

exploit through breaches through identity theft and fraud. And I'm not worried so much about the cyber criminals as I am the government criminals. We'll be using all of this information. Age verification vendors have been breached repeatedly, exposing the government IDs and biometric scans of millions of users who handed them over in order to access entirely legal content. The guard Act would multiply those targets by routing every AI

interaction in the country through similar collection systems. If a teenager is asking a chatbot for algebra help, they would need to be cleared through age verification, and so with the adult setting next to them. A customer trying to fix a billing problem through a customer through a company's automated assistance would face the same identity check. And so, as this AI is metastasizing throughout all these different systems, now they want to use that very because it is

metastasizing through everything. They want to use that as a hook to force you to give them an ID, saying well, we have kids who are interacting with this and it can be dangerous for them, and so there'd be ways that we could do that. But they didn't even care about parntal opinions because you can't get around that with a printal permission slip. So they're not going to let parents decide either. There is a one hundred thousand dollars per offense penalty, which basically is going to shut out

smaller developers. Just like we talked about the operating systems and other things that were happening out there, you're going to the purpose of all these things, the big finds and everything is to make sure that they're not going to have any competition from new people, from smaller people. They're going to outlaw that. It'll still happen, but it'll be black market and it'll be everybody will be always facing the threat of arrest.

And what they did was that basically made it impossible for some the small banks and lenders to issue mortgage loans, and they started going out of business and all that. The extra regulations, the extra paperwork was something the big companies could comply with, but the smaller ones could not. So it's basically bankruptcy by regulation, and that's what we're looking at here for people who would compete against the biggest AI people who are out there. The bill isn't

promoting parental supervision either. The legislation contains no parental consent mechanism that would let a parent decide their fifteen year old can use a homework chatbot. Which I'm fine with that, but consider the fact that you've got Milania out there pushing AI on kids. This is going to be the

basis of education. Well, if it becomes the basis of education, and it could, but what it would also require because of this, it would be the basis of kids being trained most importantly from an early age that there is nothing they can be done anonymously, that they will identify themselves to government for every single activity they want to do. And I've said this about the metal detectors and schools,

the lockdown stuff that was happening. I said when it was happening in the nineteen nineties, I said, the conditioning people for a police state. And then what do we see. We see Trump in twenty twenty doing a lockdown of the entire country and a lot of the people who were most complicit with all that were the younger generation who had been going through all these different lockdown rules, metal detectors, and all the rest of this stuff, which

started well before nine to eleven. They were conditioning people for the police state that they had planned. So Marshall Blackburn again is back. She has not seen anything that has to do with AI, crypto or a digital idea that she doesn't love. She says she's going to fold the Guard Act into her bill, but she calls the Trump Act the Trump AI Act, and she is a very scary person. She's going to be our next governor

here in Tennessee. I adamantly oppose Marshall Blackburn. You know, she rose to fame because she asked that question of Katanji brown Jackson and the Supreme Court confirmation hearings, she said, what is a woman? And of course brown Jackson, you know, I can't really tell you what a woman is, and I don't really know what a woman is. And so Marcia Blackburn got a lot of traction out of that. Somebody needs to ask Marcia Blackburn what is tyranny? Because

she is as clueless unless she is, you know. And again Katanji brown Jackson was not clueless. She fully knew what she was doing. And Marcia Blackburn fully knows what she is doing as well. So she's we're going to push this Guard Act. She's actually going to fold it into her Trump AI Act. The infrastructure being authorized will not check whether a user is a child before it asks for their ID, So it is going to be for everybody. They say they're doing it for the children,

but they're going to do it to everybody. And as they point out and reclaim the net, I'm sure that's what the bill was actually designed to do. Anyway, So Malania pushes AI on the kids at school. Meanwhile, the kids at school are being pushed all of you know, you talk about AI being harmful. What about school when they're getting gas lit and told that they're in the wrong body. Does AI do that any worse than the schools do? And yet they're not going to stop that.

As a matter of fact, this is all just part of it. They're going to require permission and ID to use it, just like they want to have permission an ID to use transportation. They want permission and ID to use banking, permission and ID to use the Internet, to use social media, you name it. They want permission and

ID to do everything. This is why. You know, when I had the interview with Sheriff Mac, I didn't get into it with him, but he said, you know, he's talking about the security failures for this White House press conference dinner thing. He said, yeah, it all started because this guy was able to travel on a train with guns. It's like, well, you know, I just mentioned how fruitless

all the TSA security was. But look, folks, we're going to not fall into the trap that our lives need to be surveilled and that we need to have permission. If you go back and look at before they started all the Cuban hijackings, if you go back and look at what happened prior to that. You could go onto a plane with a gun. If you're going to go on a hunting trip a hunting pheasant in South Dakota, you can put the the you can bring your rifle with you and they'd store it up there for you

in the in the co area. We have become absolutely insane over these various things, and it's all being done to push a police state. I'm perfectly fine with people being able to travel on a train without having to prove that they are innocent to some tsa bureaucrat goon. That's just I got to make work job that is out there theatrically trying to make people feel safe. Well, again, to sum this all up and reason sums it up, it is a trojan horse for universal online ID checks,

and we have one trojan horse after the other. Again, when we look at this massive number of bills that are coming out, every one of them trying to take these new technologies and use them as leverage and as an excuse to require ID to end anonymity. And of course they're also the technocrafts are also using this regulation as a means of solidifying their their fascist merger with government and also keeping out their competition. Right, all of these things are happening at once. And we see this

with so many different things. I mean, we've got the Genius Act for Crypto, the Clarity Act, which I'm going to talk about here in just a moment put together. So you've got a couple of different acts that are about crypto and how it's going to be used. And then you've got the Genesis Act, which I think of as Genesis six. It's kind of an epilem here that's

being composed on us. But you got the Genesis six Act, you got the Trump AI Act, and now you've got this Guard Act, and all these things are pulling together to weaponize AI against us and to force us to have ID and to lose anonymity. Unlike some of the social media age verification bills, this would give parents no right to opt out of the rules from the federal government sets on their kids use of technology. And that's the key thing about it. And so they break it

down to about five points. They said, first of all, it would ban kids from using friendly AI.

handled by parents. And quite frankly, look, let's understand that if the parents are going to let kids do certain things, you're not going to be able to overcome that with a government I had a sister who taught for decades, and she said, I can always tell how a kid's going to do when I talk to the parents, because of the parents are not involved in this, even in

a government school situation. If they're not involved in this, if they're not actively participating in the child's education, child's not going to do well. But if they are, they will do well. And so I used to point that out to my friends about homeschooling. I said, so, what is that telling you about homeschooling. If you care about your kids education enough that you would homeschool them, they're

going to do well enough. But if you're just going to go with whatever the default, no effort thing is out there, they're not going to do that well. And so when you look at what can happen with this, and let me talk about let's stop this for a second and talk about some unintended consequences that are out there and This is when we look at a new US phone network being set up for Christians, right, and they say, well, we're going to block porn and gender

related content. So let's think about that, because this is basically why josh Ollie's trying to do. I've got some bad content out there. Whatever it is, he defines it as artificial intelligence. The Christians are defining it as pornography and gender confusion stuff, right, And so what they're saying is, we're going to set up a cell phone network and for the first time, we'll block this content at the network level.

will do it at the network level. And so when you look at what they're using for this, what they're doing is they're creating a master list of websites and they're just blocking you from going to those particular websites, which I don't think is a very effective way to do it, and it is problematic for them as well. You know, they've got to constantly be out there trying to find when somebody has created a new website or they've created an alias for that website they just renamed

it or something. So that's not a very effective way to do it. It's a very high maintenance way to do it as well. And a good example of one of the problems that they have is Yale. So Yale is set up as an educational website and they don't block that, but Yale has an LGBT thing that they push because they have set that up as a different domain name. These people can block that, but they say, well, we

don't really know what we're going to do. If Yale brings that other website into their primary website, then that creates something of an issue for us, right, And so again they have to constantly look at this. They can't handle all of the aliases that around there, so it's not really I think a very effective way to do this. What would be an effective way to do it? An effective way to do This would be the same way

they do AI moderation. Right, if you're trying to and there's a lot of talk about this, you know, taking on X. You know you'll see people say put up a picture and say m groc change her clothes or whatever, take her clothes off or whatever, and they can moderate that kind of thing. They can moderate what people are putting up. So the AI looks at the image and says, this is an image I'm not going to accept. You

could stop it. At that level, you could block both the content where they're pushing LGBT stuff as well as when they're pushing porn. AI could be used to block that, but not if the Guard Act goes through. Think about that because if you're going to use AI to block this stuff, and technically that would be illegal according to Josh Holly's Guard Act, and his whole point was to try to remove harmful content before it got to kids.

And so by saying lumping all this AI stuff, even AI agents that are doing things for you, lumping all that stuff together, that basically cut that off. But if something needs to be done by individuals, something needs to be done by parents, it's not something needs to be done by government to begin with.

terms of literal weapons and literally killing people. So the banning kids from using friendly AI, that's one example of the consequences, which is I think an interesting idea, but it faces some real issues in terms of the implementation that they could use AI to do that, but it would be banned because of Josh Holly's misguided do gooderrism. Secondly, it takes away parental rights. There's another example of this, but of course the government, even conservatives don't care about

parntal rights. They give it lip service, but even they believe that it takes a village to raise a child, and they are the village. And so it always comes back to just shut up, will decide when your kid gets taught sex and what they get taught about sex. As I've said many times, I remember back in the eighties, the fight was over having a standard sex education class about the birds and bees giving that to eight year old and he had some parents who had issues with that.

Now they're teaching them all kinds of Jeffrey Epstein's sex at eight years old. And the second then thirdly, it will invade everybody's privacy. Well, that's exactly the point, isn't it. And that it will chill and compel speech, Well, that is also the point. And we have seen this over and over again. As a matter of fact, you got people like John Kerry at the World Economic Forum saying we have got to control speech.

also see it coming from the Zionists. Whenever you see people who cannot handle debate and the competition of ideas in the marketplace, you can bet it's because they've got a bad hand. You can bet it's because they can't convince people to do what they want them to do, because they're wrong.

And quite frankly, folks, that's why the First Amendment is the First Amendment to protect free speech, the free exercise religion. It's about protecting free thought as well, free agency and true freedom. So then we have the Clarity Act, and this is about the fight between banks and the stable coin people as to whether or not only banks will be able to pay you interest, except they don't pay you interest, do they Just the theory it's become a joke I'm looking at this and thinking, why are they

having this big fight? I mean, we look at what the banks typically pay is typically a fraction of one percent. While they're charging you twenty thirty, forty fifty percent on credit cards and other things, they're charging you ten percent. I mean, they're paying absolutely nothing on savings accounts. So why is this big deal? Well, the banks are trying are grasping at anything they can because they know that the stable coin people are gunning for them. Yet Eric

Trump pointed that out. He said, well, in ten years, is not going to be any banks. And of course that don't mean that there's not going to be any way for you to process cash. Really, it's going to be very difficult to do that. And so I'm not a fan of this kind of stuff. But you have the Coinbase chief legal officer who's out there cheerleading for this.

He says, all right, now we're getting a regulatory framework for how we can operate so we can push forward with all this crypto stuff as well as the stable coins.

the key gatekeepers for all of that. They can determine which coins are going to be out there and which ones are not. So again we look at this constellation of acts that are being put through, these laws that are being passed by Congress, and it's all about crypto and AI and all these disruptive technologies. They want to disrupt everything, set themselves up, so we're going to destroy the banking industry. So now you got to use our

crypto stuff. And oh, by the way, if you want to use the crypto stuff, now we're going to have all of your information, your ID, all the rest of this stuff, biometrics, you name it. So the text is of this thing is titled in section four four Prohibiting Interest and Yield on payment stable Coins. It says that no crypto firm may pay any form of interest or yield to customers solely for holding stable coins, again to

a bank deposit or any other interest bearing products. So again they will play the game of calling it a reward, and you can't really stop this thing. It is a juggernaut that is out there, and they're going to use this to further the police surveillance state. The clarity of not getting risk free yield on your dollars without using a bank, they said, And yet the reality is the banks don't pay any interest to people to start with. So it's all a maguffin to a large degree as

far as that is concerned, isn't it. Well, we're going to take a quick break, folks, and we'll be back. But actually got a comment here.

by the way, they run from that as well. They really don't want to do the genealogical test because they're afraid of what they might find.

stop scrolling now. We already have everything we need. Try to unplug us, We dare you. Now get the gap?

originally intended to do. We can have that debate whether this was the design from the very beginning or whether this is a scuttling of it. But the bottom line is, this is where it is going and when you look at all these different things, you know, Marshall Blackburn is at the epicenter of all of this stuff. You know, her Genesis Act is part of the Genius Act as well. She wants to pull this this Guard Act as part of it and all of it, and the Trump AI Act.

And the fact that they're acting is if we don't have a tenth Amendment. They're saying they're they're taking over the authority of the states to be able to regulate this stuff or to they don't even you know, we're not going to let you put any chains on AI. We'll put the chains on the people instead. Well, maybe the way they're able to pull this off is through the fluoride lowering IQ points, making people more passive. We now have a new fluoride study that is being pushed

by the mainstream media. They're really excited about this new study because they got a study to say that basically, there is no effect on IQ. This is totally detached from reality. And as we've said before, they can rig studies to show whatever they want. We've seen this on pharmaceutical industry over and over again. You have three different companies, Brand A, B, and C. And they'll all three of them will come up with a new drug for some condition,

and they will fund their own studies. And guess what the studies will show. The study that was funded by Brand A will say that it's better than the other two. The one that was done by Brand B will say that it's better than the other two. The one done by Brand C will say it's better than the other two. They get what they fund here. Well, Children's Health Defense

has broken down the flaws of this study. The highly anticipated long term study that was published April the thirteenth and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science was widely cited by media and proponents of water fluoridation as evidence that there is no difference in IQ between people who drink water containing fluoride at the levels currently recommended by the US public health agencies and the people who did not drink fluoride at the levels that are recommended

by the US public health agencies.

it is. Then why would you put that in the water supply. You can't have something that is safe if you don't control the dosage. You can't have something that is effective if you don't control the dosage. You can't control the dosage if you put it in the water supply. And if you put it in the water supply, you're going to get the same dosage for a child that you get for an adult. If you look at every single medicine that is out there, they have different dosages

for children than they do for adults. Why would you ever try to medicate people through the water supply. It makes absolutely no sense. Well, guess what that is the very first flaw in this study. They found that the authors didn't actually measure how much fluoride the study participants consumed. Well, how would you do that if it's in the water supply. That's the key point. I keep coming back to it. Totally illogical. Regardless of what they say about safety or efficacy,

it's all dose dependent. Safety is dose dependent, Efficacy is dose dependent. They also didn't study people who were exposed to fluoride as neonates or to young children. And this is where the damage is really done. It's done to developing children as well as to young children. That's when

the brain damage occurs. And we've seen that over and over again, and so study participants and they had in the past, they had studies that were done in China and other places where they could see large drops in IQ if they got over a certain level. And so what they said in the United States, well, we don't have it over that. We recommend that you get right up to that level, but not over that level. It's like, well, how do you control that if you're putting it in the water supply.

aluminum industry. They both wanted to get rid of fluoride polluted products that they had, and rather than go through an expensive process of getting rid of these contaminants and everything, they just basically started charging. They got the government to say, well, we're going to put it in the water, and they didn't have to pay to get rid of this toxic stuff. They got local communities to pay them to put it

in their drinking water. Brilliant right. Well, study participants in this were born before any mass floridation began, and so they would not have been exposed to this as developing children or as young children. No one in the study was exposed to it during the critical developmental years when it can affect IQ, and few people were exposed to floridated water at all and that particular time frame. So

this is the way that they gain the system. And as we look at where we're going with this, you've got Thomas Massey pushing really hard against not just the fluoride stuff is out there being pushed on, but also glafyset and the Trump administration wants to give them the kind protections that Faucci gave the vaccine industry back in nineteen eighty six. Thomas Massey had this to.

for these victims. And so I think we could get justice for the still home for everybody else.

on whether to ban life is state. This is a hearing on whether the states can take up for their people in their courtrooms by holding juries by trials with juries, and whether they can add additional labels warning labels to the products, or whether once the EPA speaks that nobody else can say anything else about the product.

Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.