Tue Episode #2081: Trump Orders Jail for Flag Burning — First Amendment Shredded

and discover. For example, the war that he has now with this Federal Reserve board of governors trying to move Cook one of the governors. He's actually right, she did break the law, but she hasn't been charged. And the question is who's got jurisdiction here? And she is asserting that she's independent of all this because the Federal Reserve,

she says, it's private. Isn't that interesting? Who knew? So discovery may be interesting, and it also brings up questions about an executive order that Donald Trump wants to have one year in prison for people who burn the American flag? What should we do with politicians who burned the American constitution? Stay with us we'll be right back. Well, Donald Trump yesterday signed an executive order. Actually I think it was Monday, Yeah, Monday that he signed the executive orse. Today is was

yesterday losing Tiger? Which day of the week it is already and only two days into it. I only got to choose from anyway, he signed the executive order, and listen to what he had to say about that.

like when I signed the Statute and Monument Act. Ten years in jail, have you heard any about beautiful monuments? Everybody left town, they were gone. Never had a problem after that. It's pretty amazing we stopped it. But this is something that's I don't know. In a certain way, it's equally as important. Some people would say it's more important because the people in this country don't want to see our American flag burned and spit on, and by people that are.

leaders on Friday. You saw that with NATO where they agreed to go from two percent no pay to five percent fully paid up, trillions of dollars paid, where they respect your president to a level that they jokingly called me the president of Europe. They called me the president of Europe, which is an honor. I like Europe, and I like those people. They're good people to great leaders.

And we've never had a case where seven plus really twenty eight essentially thirty five thirty eight countries were represented here. The other day, thirty eight European countries were European and other countries were represented, and it was a great meeting. But your country is respected again. I say it all the time. One year ago, our country was dead. Everybody said it. We had a dead we were not going to survive. Now we have the hottest country anywhere in

the world. So it's an honor to be involved in this group. Has a lot to do with it.

by the Bill of Rights in the First Amendment. That's what I hate to see destroyed, burned, trashed. And as Trump was saying, you know, they pay the radical left is paid by these people who do this kind of stuff. Who's paying you, Trump to shut down First Amendment rights of protests and protect a foreign country like Israel. They're the ones coming after our First Amendment and you've been their puppet and you've spat on the Constitution one way

after the other. What should we do with people like him? It's amazing to me.

the Democrats did. They went after people who were just there because they did geo fencing, and they found the people who were there and they prosecuted them, and even as I point out a situation where two elderly men and one of them's son that they need to go to the restroom, and the doors are opened there in the Capitol building, and they walked over to the police officers and asked them who a restroom is? They said, right inside, going here. They went in there, they used

the restroom. They came out and there was a female cop and she tried to direct them onto the house floor. I said, no, no, no, we don't want to go further, and we just wanted to use the restroom.

get the same kind of treatment. They don't care about the fact that Harvard was getting nine billion with a B dollars worth of taxpayer money from Washington d C. The only care that Harvard was allowing people to protest a foreign country that was paying the politicians like crump here. So the executive Order instructs the Attorney General to prosecute those who burned us a great the American flag. So

here's a new federal crime. As I say the other day when we were talked yesterday, when we were talking about the federalization of the police, as a reason, pointed out there were only three crimes in the constitution, which kind of says that they did not envision that the federal government would have police. As a matter of fact, nobody had police at the local level. You had a sheriff and you had the community that was armed, and that was how order was kept. But now they're inventing

crimes to go after people. And this is just more of Trump's vendetta. He says, this main clube is not limited to this is what the order says, violent crimes, hate crimes, illegal discrimination against American citizens, or other violations of American civil rights. Well, those are all crimes in and of themselves. Whenever you see this kind of hate speech nonsense. They tried to tie it in to things that were already crimes. Violent crime has already been a crime.

And again it goes back to what Biden did. If somebody physically assaults or breaks and enters or destroys property or whatever in January sixth, some did that was already a crime. You don't need to then extend that to everybody who was present, which is what they did. So both the Republicans and the Democrats have the ridiculous hate speech rules that are in direct conflict with the First Amendment.

down three decades ago, nineteen eighty nine. There's a Supreme Court case. As he said, it was five to four, and so some of the conservatives are saying, oh, wait a minute, you know that means but you know, it was all of the conservatives on one side and all the liberals on the other side, and the tiebreaker was Scalia, who stood with the First Amendment. And so they said,

it's not a clear cut decision at all. I remember a time when about the only thing that the left got right was the free speech issue, and that was one of the few things that they got right. And they did get that right, but it was because they were protesting the war and things like that, and they

wultn't to be able to do that. They have now completely abandoned that, and many conservatives have as well as we're going to point out here, though some conservatives have gotten a little bit of a spine here to take on Trump and actually talk about the fact that this is in conflict with not only the Supreme Court, but actually the Constitution itself. So in a few times, the Supreme Court got something right, and we'll see what happens

with that. They said. The justices said that the First Amendment protects expressive conduct such as burning the American flag. Justice Kennedy, in a separate concurrence, acknowledged the rulings on popularity, but he wrote, quote, the flag protects those who hold it in contempt. And the converse of that is that you've got people like Trump who hold the Constitution in contempt but worship the flag and talk about desecration and

how we should honor this thing. It's like a religious relic to them, and it is kind of a state religion. That's one of the things. I guess it's always kind of turned me off of the flag stuff. People get so precious about the flag that are their symbols, and that of course can be the LGBT people, and you know, they paint their their paint, their rainbow colors on a crosswalk and then if somebody comes along and protest it by doing a burnout on it. Yeah, don't burn the

flag and don't burn out. Don't burn out the rainbow crosswalk. Are you going to get in trouble? But that was the protest as well. But these people have their symbols, and their symbols are sacred to them. It's a religion to them. And I guess that's one of the reasons why I could never really get into the Pledge of Allegiance and flags and things like that. It was because it was too much. I saw the reverence and the religiosity that was being attached to it, and it's like,

I'm not going there anyway. They called it freedom of speech, Trump said, But there's another reason, which is perhaps much more important. It's called death again. Really, death is the reason. Yeah, he would love to give the death penalty to people who do things that he doesn't like. That's the kind of guy that he is. How about your executive order for fake emergencies.

hate free speech there. And the Trump administration Fire said while people can be prosecuted for burning anything in a place that they are not allowed to set fires, the government cannot prosecute protected expressive activity, even if many Americans, including the President, find it quote uniquely offensive and provocative.

And so this has been a pet peeve of his for years, talking about flag burning, and a lot of people talked about that as well, who said I would never burn a flag because to them, the flag represents things like the First Amendment, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution. It's not a club or a power trip like it represents obviously to a Trump.

It calls acts of desecration. See that's why we're talking about this. Like I say, religious relic, I reject the cult of the omnipotent state. When I saw that in the Libertarian Party's statement, you know, with principles, they had me right there. It's like, you guys get it. It is a cult. It is a cult of the omnipotent state. And I'm disgusted with that. I will not pledge allegiance

to that cult because it's not about the Constitution. I pledge allegiance to the Constitution, but not taking these politicians or these political parties. Says it is uniquely offensive and provocative, a statement of contempt, hostility, and violence against our nation. No, it's against your administration. That sounds like nation, doesn't it. But yeah, so the politicians who burn their bill rights

should be impeached at the very least. Trump is an international war criminal for what he's done with the mRNA jabs, but he'll never be indicted, even let alone punished in this life.

flag burning in the weeks ahead. Jesse Kelly said I would never in a million years harm the American flag, but a president telling me I can't has me as close as I'll ever be to the lighting one on fire. I am a free American citizen, and if I ever feel like torching one, I will. This is garbage. This reminds me the seen from a Wooty Iswen movie where he is he's out of his emblement in New York and he's driving a car like around La or so.

I think it's Annie Hall or something, and he gets pulled over by a cop and the guy gets gets real officious with him, and so you know, he finally pulls out his license and he's about to hand it to the cop. He just tears it up in the CoP's face. Well, since you put it that way and he just tears up, That's the way I feel about this order right here.

He said. It is unfortunately well settled constitutional law that burning the flag is a matter of free speech, and the executive does not get to create crimes. That's the other part of it. Like I said, this is creating a new crime that's not in the Constitution. It is a clear violation of the First Amendment. I don't think that the Supreme Court decisions are the law of the land, but this is a situation where they actually got it right. Scalia,

in writing about this is actually his son. Scalia is dead now, but his son put out a quote from him about this decision. Scalia said, you should be in no doubt that patriotic conservative that I am, I detest the burning of the nation's flag, and if I were king, I would make it a crime. King Trump, right, this is Scalia from the grave, all of these leftists calling him King Trump, and that really got to Trump. But

of course Scalia had him pegg. But as I understand the First Amendment, said Schoolliat, he guarantees the right to express contempt for the government, the Congress, the Supreme Court, even the nation and the nation's flag. And so that is ed Wheelan says, to the fullest extent possible. Sounds aggressive, but it actually means within the bounds permitted by law.

He is a legal expert, and so he's saying it sounds like he's really beating his chest here like he's back at the world at the WWE Wrestling But in reality that's actually kind of a legal claim down. So yeah, other people Christopher Rufo got it, I think did not quite get it right. He says, I'm sympathetic to the argument that burning the American flag has protected speech, but right now we're putting people in prison for spin their

tires over the Pride Flag. So it might be a good idea to have the debate about which symbols are sacred to the America, to America today, Chris, you got it one hundred percent wrong. There's no symbols that are sacred. If the substance of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights is not respected, you don't even have a rule of law. Instead of saying, well, because they're putting people in jail for the Pride Flag desecration, we should put

people in jail for desecrating our symbol. That's what he's saying. What absolute tribalism, That's that's what's wrong with conservatism today. Christopher Rufo, you just showed us exactly what the problem is. Oh, well, the left is doing X, which is wrong. So we're

going to do X as well. And of course that's the same thing that the Democrats do with everything that Trump does, as soon as he does the gun control by executive or La La Harris the next day or so came out said I'm going to do the same thing when I become president. And so they're mimicking each other. And it's the left right march of tyranny that we see over and over again, especially because of all this tribalism.

from Christopher Rufo. Yeah, it used to be like I said before, that the liberals respected First Amendment for their own purposes because they had a lot of things that they wanted to protest. But many of these conservatives were just fine with things like the drug war, things like the TSA, things like searches without warrants, things like civilized set forfeiture. So there's a lot of problems with the

conservatives not respecting the Constitution. And many of the objections here are coming from this kind of quasi religious dedication to a sacred relic, okay, and the tribalism that it represents as well. That's what we're talking about. Don't burn my pride flag, you know, don't burn my American flag. They hold these symbols as sacred and yet not the principles that we see behind it or the authority for

their office. So it's now desecrating the American flag. He wants to make that a crime that will not hold up. One person said, there's going to be a lot of people who are doing this out of spite, and he goes and there's not any of them are going to have their convictions upheld if they get them, if they're charged by the Trump administration. Let's look at what some of the people are saying. First, one is Guard Goldsmith.

They're buying up everything. There's nothing black Rock isn't getting into.

you can't take the socialism out of him. He's it's burned in there. We overthrow elected governments in Iran for doing the same thing, didn't we. You know, in Iran, they took over the elected government there back in what was it nineteen fifty three, I.

Trump negotiated a deal last week for the US government to take a substantial ownership stake in an American company, says reason Trump's despite his assurances, Trump's socialistic transaction is a terrible deal, not only for the parties involved, but for the entire US economy. And just like what he is doing with the military as police in DC and saying he's going to do that in one city after

the other. He has also said that he is going to do this with other companies and other industries as well. He is trying to remake our country. He sees himself as some kind of an FDR or Lincoln, and quite I agree with him on that. I think he is like FDR or Lincoln, and I would consign them to the hell that's reserved for these types of politicians.

Intel common stock, said the company. The government's equity stake will be funded by the remaining five point seven billion dollars in grants previously awarded but not yet paid to Intel under the US Chips and Science Act, and three point two billion awarded to the company as part of

the Secure Enclave program. The eight point nine billion dollar investment is in addition to the two point two billion dollars and Chips grants Intel has received to date, making for a total investment of eleven point one billion dollars. You see, the Chips thing is an idea that was put out there by Biden and by Bernie Sanders, who We're going to have the government start to subsidize these industries, and that's a big part of the problem. These grants

were proved under Biden before leaving office. Biden's administration rushed to finalize these grants even as Intel was the worst performing tech stock in twenty twenty four. Malinvestment is always one of the harbingers of socialism, you know, they always I wouldn't say harbinger is actually one of the characteristics of socialist governments. They always malinvest the money that they

put in. So the government actually agreed to less than initially allocated when the company failed to hit certain milestones, but instead of rescinding those grants, as Trump reportedly threatened to do, instead he demanded a tenth of the business as a result, making the US government Intel's largest shareholder, another one hundred and eighty degree flip flop, like he

did with Epstein and the documents. Right, I'm going to get rid of that Chips Act and these subsidies, he tells the Conservatives, who should be opposing this stuff, but don't because it's Trump. And then he turns around and does the same thing. The Chips Act funding was first floated by Bernie Sanders. Trump and his allies are now issuing talking points that could have come from the socialist

senator himself because they are socialists themselves. They're fascists. Economically, the US government insists on dishing out taxpayer money to private companies. If they do that is there any reason that it shouldn't. As a US Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick says, get a piece of the action. This guy is the poster child for corrupt, crony capitalism that is really in the mold of the Chinese Communist Party. Lutnik

and the people in the Trump administration. The most immediate risks that Intel's decisions will increasingly be driven by political rather than commercial considerations, said Scott Lenna Cocony of the Cato Institute. I'm not sure how to pronounce his last name, so I'll just refer to him as the Cata Institute. As I've said before, when you merge government with religion, what you wind up with or church or whatever. What you wind up with is government. When you merge government

with corporations, what you wind up with is government. Government always smothers and destroys whatever you think is going to come in and help, he said. With the US government as its largest shareholder, INTEL will face constant pressure to align corporate decisions with the goals of whatever political party is in power, the same way that when you ally government with churches, the churches will feel the pressure to align with the politicians and they will also be rewarded

if they do, punished if they don't. So again, when you mix a company, a corporation with politics, you're going to wind up with a political company that is going to be making these decisions not based on economic reality or the desires of customers. Know, the government becomes their customer. Intel's US based competitors might find themselves a disadvantage when buying for government contracts or subsidies, winning trade or tax

really for complying with federal regulations. Private capital might in turn flow to Intel and away from leaders and innovation in the semiconductor ecosystem, not for economic reasons, but because Uncle Sam now has his thumb on the scale, picking the winners and the losers. White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett told CNBC on Monday that he is quote sure, at some point there'll be more transactions, if

not in this industry, then in other industries. And as I said at the beginning of this, it's just like the military, police and DC. Now we're going to go to other cities, and they're going to go to other companies, other industries, and they're going to start partner becoming partners and taking over chunks of them, just like the Chinese

Communist did. And guess what, just like in Chinese Communist part you're going to have the leaders of the government are to be making special money off of this stuff. You talk about insider trading, They're going to be getting kickbacks and everything else. Trump has made several such deals

just since re entering office in January. Of course, you know, leaning on Nvidia and AMD, We've never ever had the federal government take a share in a corporation like this before, and we've never had the federal government putting an export tax as they've done on Nvidia and AMD. You know, all of this stuff about tariffs was supposed to be because we were going to have help manufacturing and that

means helping exports in this country. And now Trump is putting a export tax on what is produced in this country. It's absolutely insane and inconsistent everything he does. And of course he bought into a rare earth mineral mind in the US MP minerals four hundred billion dollar government investment made by the Department of Defense, which is now its

largest shareholder. I will make deals like that for our country all day long, said Trump because I don't I don't support the constitution right anyway, the Republicans won't likely be in power forever. In time, a Democrat president will have the same influence on Intel and on other companies and other industries. And here's the key takeaway from this. I like this quote. An economist at the Competitive Enterprise Institute Ryan Young said, both parties are forgetting a cardinal

rule of politics. Don't give yourself powers that you don't want your opponents to have. How many times have I said that? You know, look at what Trump is doing when he goes out and he does gun control by executive order. That's the power that he's put on the table aft for La LA to pick up and use. And they do that over an over again. So don't give yourself powers that you don't want your opponents to have.

So as this is all happening now, Trump is working on commandos going to Mexico, and Ken Klippenstein has been the one who has been reporting on this, and he has a very long article about time that he has spent. The people who's talked to at Special Operations Command North. These are people who were previously working on the Arctic keeping that secure from the Russian threat, I guess, and al Qaeda. You know, you never know what Elchi is going to show up in the Arctic. And so now

they've been repurposed. They've been up there looking for a mission because nothing is happening up there, right, so I need to justify it. Well, now Trump has given him a mission and he's going to repurpose it to go after the cartels. And I'm telling you that the cartels are going to start attanking infrastructure here or politicians or whatever.

And if they don't, I think that the Trump administration of the people in power in Washington will do a false flag to say that it's from them, so they can roll out this plan that I showed yesterday that the Pentagon has been talking about how the coming wars are gonna be fought in the cities against civilians. Trump designated international cartels as Enemy number one. The Arctic was

traded for Mexico. Northern Command, officially responsible for the defense of America, was established in November twenty thirteen, long after nine to eleven, and unfortunately for them, every other geographic fighting area had already been taken. It's not head to go to the Arctic. But now they get to go

to Mexico. So lacking terrorists to kill or counterinsurgencies to fight, Soak North was assigned every task under the sun, a roller coaster of missions that somehow contributed to quote defending the homeland against unconventional threats. On the walls of new headquarters are maps of the Arctic Circle from Alaska to Greenland. In the midst of Sock North planners or commandos meeting Russian spetsnets as they made their way south through the ice.

Then came Trump, and the Arctic maps were rolled up and put away. As the border in Mexico became a top priority, defending America would no longer be a femeral or a contingency plan set in some mythical future. The military was ordered to deal with the immediate threats of illegal immigration, drugs, and cartels. But we're going to take a quick break. When we come back, you're going to see that the Defense Department. This is another thing that

Trump wants to say. He wants to take it back to the War Department, and so we're going to talk about that when we come back. It's actually a little bit of truth in advertising. As Lance said when we were talking about laughed about it, and it's a bit more truthful to call the War Department.

that kind of money. But because he got some of the details, they want to come after him on the details. Even though nobody in Congress cared about James Clapper lying to you about surveillance of the American people. But now he has a real crime. As I also said at the time, this female governor, black female, first one to be in the Federal Reserve, and her name is Cook, and she took out two loans almost at the same time.

I think they were two months apart, and in both of them she said they were going to be her primary residence, except one of them was in Georgia and the other one was I think Michigan or Minnesota or something like that. And so it was a lie about one of them. As a matter of fact. The one in Georgia she then put up for rent. So there's a paper trail that shows that she lied on her mortgage. One the question is is this something that the federal government is going to be involved in I don't know

who actually has jurisdiction there. She has not been charged, and she's denying that she did anything wrong. Also a liar. But think about the fact that you got the Central Yeah, you got one of these people in charge of the bank of banks here, the Central Bank, and they're lying on their mortgage application, which is crime for other people to do it. So she says that she has not been charged of the crime. She didn't commit a crime,

and she says, I'm not leaving. Trump has sent her a notice that she has now been I don't know relieved the duty or how we phrased it or whatever. But it's going to be interesting this back and forth, and she, in making her case says, well, we're private, you have no jurisdiction over me. So I think it's going to be an interesting discovery as part of this.

doing well. I foresee that by the end of the day there will be a trend of flag burning videos on Twix, Twitter, slash X. Yeah, we'll have to wait and see. Maluten Malankovic. Bailing out Intel was a horrible idea. It's just a grift for Israel. Now it's an Intel, an Israeli company, I do.

and you're pledging allegiance to that. They wanted that, and they wanted the government schools to teach their version of history, and just prior to World War Two, the protocol was that you were to do the pledge with your right hand extended out, palm down. Does that look familiar that it's like a Nazi salute? Right? Well they changed that to put your hand over your heart, right because of the Nazis, And then in the nineteen fifties they added

under God to soften it. But we know where it came from, and you know what the spirit behind it is.

He's speaking about how the leftists move. All the sub college students have to pretend to be leftists in order to succeed. This is a Northwestern University survey that was done. They surveyed fourteen hundred and fifty two interviews with students at several different colleges over a period of two years. Eighty eight percent said that they pretended to hold more leftist views and they truly endorse to succeed socially or academically.

live by lies, but just don't believe them yourself. At the very least, if you don't have the courage to push back against that, at least don't start to believe it yourself, because you realize that as you and so do the left. You know, it's this whole thing about the more you repeat this stuff, eventually you can get yourself to believe it double thinking. They assimilate you that way.

But this is also nothing new. When I was in college, I had to take some core courses and I don't even remember what the subject was, but the very first class, the guy got up and started, you know, lecturing us about how wonderful Marx and Lenen were. And it wasn't a course on Marxist and Leninu's ideas. It was not supposedly a political course, but he was going to make

it a political course. And so I just walked straight out there the first class and dropped the class, just removed it, because it's like, there's no way that I'm going to play his game, and I know that he's going to flunk me. And that's what these students are saying. Seventy eight percent of students said that they self censor their beliefs surrounding gender identity. Seventy two percent do it

on politics, sixty eight percent on family values. More than eighty percent said that they had submitted class work that misrepresented their views in order to align with professors. For many, this has become second nature, an instinct for academic and professional self preservation. And that's what Rod Dreer said in

the preface to his book. He said he'd had people who had immigrated to America from Eastern Europe, and they had come from communist countries and to tolitarian countries, and they were very concerned about what they were seeing in America,

that people were self censoring themselves. And Rod Dreer, who was working in academia, I think he said, had other people say that they will speak in hush tones when they're in a restaurant, thinking that somebody is going to hear them, that knows them and is going to get them in trouble at the university. And it's like, I don't want to have anything to do with this. That's like that it's a detlitarian Marxist system and it is

thoroughly permeated the universities. When it comes to gender ideology. For example, eighty seven percent of students identified as heterosexual and said that they believe that there are only two genders. Seventy seven percent said biological sex, not gender identity, should be recognized in areas like sports, healthcare, or data collection, but they would never voice these opinions in public. This is what's so wrong about our university system that is

so heavily subsidized by the government. So living by lies, Yeah, they truly are. That's a way of life. So a lot of back and forth about Trump's hands, and of course, if you can find that article there and pull up the picture he had a few days ago, very awkwardly, it looks like evidently he did it himself because he didn't even try to blend it out, and he tried

to cover up a bruise on it hand. And then he showed up in the office as he's doing these executive orders about flag burning and with no makeup on. He's got his one hand covering the other hand. But when he moved it away, people could see that was deeply bruised. Well, look at those pictures. People are saying, oh, yeah, he's dying and all the resta stuff. It's like I saw that on my dad. For the longest time, he

was on blood Thinner's he had cardiac issues. He had had a blood clot when he was in his early forties that caused him to go blind in one eye. So they kept him on blood dinner. All of the whole time I knew him, he was on blood dinner, and he would get bruises that would look like that

that were very bad, just over nothing. He didn't even remember hitting anything, And so you know, there may be some They've always said that he has some circuitary issues, which obviously are the case with his swollen ankles, and he's seventy eight years old. But anyway, both his friends and enemies are getting all excited about this, a lot of speculation about it. I think that, uh, it is, and he's got it on his other hand as well. Uh, this is just something that is part of old age

that is there. And the real issue is not his hand. I think they've talked more about his hand than they have the executive orders that he signed with a with a bruised hand, And that's the problem that I have with him.

get into something else. He's talking about changing the Department of Defense to make it the Department of War. And it was always called the Department of War until nineteen forty nine. And so after World War II, we created the National Security State, which has not provided security for the nation. Instead, what it has done it's this got us involved in one war after the other that we were not attacked, and so they've been using the military

as a international police force. And it's not about the defense of this country. But we were talking about it, and we were laughing about it, as Land said, well, at least they're going to be honest about it for a change, because that's what it truly is about. It's not about defending this country. It's simply about getting us involved in wars. And that's not how you defend the country. You defend the country by keeping us out of wars.

But such it's so focused on wars. I thought it was kind of indicative of the lies that we've been told by the Pentagon since World War II. And you know this they called the Defense Department and all the rest of this stuff. But it reminds me of Dave Pells routine of what you said about Trump, he said, this guy is truly amazing. He says, he'll he'll come

out of these enclaves. These elites are right, and he'll tell you won't believe what they're talking about doing in there, and he'll tell you all the stuff they're going to do. And then he said, and then the SOB will go back in and do it himself. He'll join them. He told you what they're actually doing. And I thought, that's that's exactly right. So he's gonna tell us, Yeah, it's a Department of War and we're going to have some more wars. It's, you know, not the Department of Peace.

So we're going to take a quick break. When we come back, we're going to talk about what's going on with Israel. Uh, there's some information that's come out, of course, there's also been a couple more attacks, and uh, there's not really any question, folks, that it is genocide. The own their own statistics at the idea of the Israeli Defense Force show that it is a genocide, and it probably manipulated those as well to make it look not quite as bad as it is.

could undo that pretty easily rather than solder.

ghost ship or something. But they had recorded the video where first they shot up an area where there was a guy at camera and they recorded that and then they waited until clearly marked ambulance came and as they were as they grabbed the cameraman and other people who'd been shot in the first attack, they then put them in the ambulance and then they shot up the ambulance. And that was leaked by Wiki leaks, and that really was the thing that set the government on fire to

go after Julian massage. They called it collateral murder. Well, similar things just happened. The Associated Press said the initial strike was at ten ten am guds the time, hit the fourth floor of the hospital, which was a surgical operating room and a doctor's residences, killing at least two people. Once rescue workers and journalists arrived at the scene. A second strike hit, killing eighteen more people, a double tap attack that was caught on video. There's really Outlet nine

magazine published the investigation last month. They said the IDF has adopted using double tap strikes as a standard procedure in Gaza. They said the video of the double tap strike on Nasser Hospital is footage of murder quote unquote again collateral murder. According to Reuters, the initial strike killed one of its contractors, a cameraman who was killed in near a live broadcasting position operated by Reuters on the upper floor of the hospital. And this is an article

from anti war dot com. They said they have a photo account with Reuters and they've used many of this photograph of this guy in his work. The Israeli newspaper Heretz reported that the Israeli military said that the initial strike targeted a camera, which they claimed was a Hamas camera that was being used to observe IDEA forces. They say that Israeli tank shells struck the area, then another

one was fired to make sure the camera was destroyed. Nettanna, who later claimed that double tap strike was a tragic mishap. So first they said, yeah, it was people who were taking pictures for the other side, you know, just like at Harvard or whatever. The other four journalists that were killed in the Israeli attack on the hospital we're mentioned here freelancers for Associated Press or for some of them work for Middle East IE or Al Jazeera or whatever.

But Israeli forces killed sixty four Palestinians in Gaza over twenty four hours, the last twenty four hours. This is a running update that's done every day on anti war dot com. If you go there you can see how many dozens of people have been murdered the last Over the last day. In terms of civilians, Israeli forces killed sixty four Palestinians wounded two hundred and seventy eight over the previous twenty four hour period, as relentless US backed

Israeli attacks continue across the Strip. Among the dead were nineteen Palestinians killed while attempting to get food at the aid sites and Netna who has It's now been reported from an Israeli newspaper that he has shut down seven ceased fire deals, deals that have been agreed to by the other side, and yet he's shut them down, including very early on when they could have released hostages. This is one of the reasons why you have so many

people in Israel who are protesting Netanyahu. Over the course of the war in Gaza, Israel has repeatedly dug up roadblocks to cease fire deals with Hamas, even when the Palestinian group accepted its conditions. According to senior American and Israeli officials interviewed by The Program, Israel blocked a ceasefire agreement. In the program is Israel's Channel thirteen investigative program he blocked.

Israel blocked the ceasefire agreement on seven different occasions during nearly two years of its devastating military campaign against the Gainstgaz. Officials said Neatna, who was chiefly responsible, often bowing to pressure from far right ministers, including bezil El Smotrik and National Security Minister Edemar Ben Gvir. A spokesperson for the US State Department, Matthew Miller under Joe Biden, said that at the start of the war in October of twenty

twenty three, Hamas was ready to release some hostages. We've been trying to get through to the government of Israel to tell them that, Miller said, but Washington could not get anyone there. To take us seriously, referring to the Israeli leadership, I don't think they wanted to have that end. Smotrick has told the Idea of Chief that anyone who does not evacuate Gaza City can die of hunger or

they can surrender. Israel's Channel twelve also reported that Natanyahu has said that he has Trump's full support for the planned offensive to take over Gaza City, but that he has limited time. Smotrick has told the head of the Israeli military that anyone who remains in Gaza City after an Idea of evacuation order can die of hunger or surrender. You can besieged them. Simtric reportedly told the IDEF Chief of Staff, whoever doesn't evacuate, don't let them no water,

no electricity. They can die of hunger or surrender. This is what we want and you are capable of doing it. There have been a lot of apologists here in America for Israeli policy who have said, that's not what's happening. This is just the fog of war and other things like this, or as Huckabee cynically said, well you know, they're getting rushed by a bunch of these people, and so they get scared in a panic and they fire into the crowd. That's what's happening. No, that's not what's happening.

Many people who are there said that they shot people who were fleeing, shot them in the back. But this is policy, this siege, policy of starvation is their policy, and they're not even quiet about it. It's just that it's not reported by American media for the most part, or the Trump administration's Zionists will put it in a different light. Eighteen Palestinians starved to death in Gaza over three days due to Israeli siege. So this is something

that's happening on a regular basis. Then we have US Ambassador Kushner. Is that a familiar name, Well, it turns out that that's Jared's dad. He's now triggered a diplomatic fight with France because he's ambassador there, demanding that France

do more for Israel. Charles Kushner, the convicted fell father of Jared Kushner, pardoned by President Trump then in his first administration and then appointed as US Ambassador to France, triggered a diplomatic fight on Sunday by writing a letter to the French government, accusing them of not doing enough for Israel.

Stuart anything except that he said that. He said, you know, his situation he said, I want to see Israel succeed, and they're poisoning people's opinion about Israel with a sustained attack against civilians.

this siege, that is enforcing this mass starvation. Eight in November of twenty twenty fourth, then like eight months ago, the International Criminal Court the issue to warrant for the arrest of Benjamin Antenna, who for the war crime of starvation, right eight months ago, eight months ago, and the United States responded by trashing the International Criminal Court, even under Biden, and then under Trump imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court.

And so the message to Israel was very clear, you can get away with worse.

pushback Neatna, who was barely elected. He had to have three different elections before he could put together parliamentary coalition to govern. And there's been a lot of pushback in Israel against these policies. But Netanya, who's very worried that people are going to see more information showing what he's doing, so he's responding against the bots.

So the idea that our national anthem would be the oura the hope, I should say our it's the Israel's national anthem.

As a reminder, you know, Kushner was jailed because he had hired a prostitute to seduce his own brother in law and arranged to secretly film the encounter as part of a witness intimidation scheme. Reports Information Liberation and guess who the prosecutor was in that Chris Christie Christi better watch his back. It's going to get the Bolton treatment pretty soon.

attorney New Jersey, Margaret. So we had some loathsome and disgusting crime going on there.

that is what we're seeing from Trump administration. If you thought the job of US ambassador was to represent the interests of the US, you would be wrong rights, information liberation, absolutely right. Now, his concern is Israel, as you point out, Travis Chris Menahan says that quotes Mike Huckabee, who said to the Israelis, you are the chosen people. If someone is angry at God, he will be angry at the people who re present him. I think this is a

real problem. This is why I pushback against Christian Zionists. I'm sorry, but what they're doing in Gaza is not representative of God and is not representative of what He wants them to do. And you've got people like Huckabee who think that they can force God's hand to do what they want to do, which is to come back and take them away so they don't have to die. And they're more than willing to cheer the mass murder of civilians another part of the world, hoping that that

will result in them not having to die. I'm absolutely disgusted with their theology and their politics, and I got to say that is not Christianity, and I got to say that to non believers because this is a disgusting perversion of Christianity that these people are teaching.

always the people who were faithful to God. It was always a part of Israel that followed God and a part of a larger part of Israel that did not follow God all throughout the Old Testament. I think within the next two to three weeks, Trump said, You're going to have a pretty good, conclusive ending to all of this. He said in the Oval office. And so I remember Smotrix said, you can do whatever you want, kill as many people as you want. We've got to do this quickly, though,

and that's the marching orders that they got. This is a collusion that is coming from our ZIONUS president. Yeah, do whatever you want to these people. This is mass murder of civilians and that is the essence of what genocide is truly about. And as I said at the beginning of the program, it says really data itself that shows that eighty three percent of the guy's of war dead are civilians. When we talk about whether or not a war is justified, we have a lot of different

aspects to that. Number one, where we attacked, okay, check that mark off. But number two, did you try to avoid civilian deaths by trying to limit this to combatants? And of course we lost our way in World War Two, both sides did, and we've been attacking civilians everybody has since then. That's unjust. Even if it has now become

the standard in commonplace, that is still unjust. And then the third thing I would mention is that you want to try to your purpose of your war is to stop the killing, especially of civilians, and so you should try to stop the war early, and you should try to avoid killing civilians, but that's not what they have done.

Figures from a classified Israeli military intelligence director at database show that at least eighty three percent of Palestinians killed with civilians, with Gadza Health authorities recording fifty three thousand deaths by May. Despite public statements asserting lower civilian losses, Israeli government and army spokespeople claimed a one to one or a two to one civilian to combat ratio combatant ratio, but the classified data reveals a much higher civilian share.

Figures in the database show eighty nine hundred named fighters dead or probably dead, with seventy three hundred and thirty certain and fifteen hundred and seventy probable. They lie NonStop, said one person, both the military echelon and the political echelon. Well, I mean that's it. When you look at any government statistics, whether they're talking about unemployment figures or talking about inflation, they lie about everything, and so these numbers are probably

not as bad as reality. The reality is probably worse. Human rights groups argue that the data bolsters the genocide claim. Experts note that an eighty three percent civilian kill rate in Gaza is exceptionally high, comparable only to Rwanda in a couple of other places like that, rising to more than eighty six percent if probable deaths are excluded. So we've always called Rwanda a genocide, but you know this is not allowed to be called a genocide because you

do that. That's a blood libel, says Mark Levan.

Israeli forces kill them as they were traveling through a military zone south of Gaza City, and the deaths add to the growing coal of Palestinians killed while seeking food as parts of the Gaza Strip plunge into famine and Israel's military camps up activity in northern Gaza ahead of

a planned offensive to seize the largest city there. A new Hampshire democrat who also appeared Sunday on Face the Nation said that the Israeli blockade in Gaza is quote a shameful black mark on humanity, that the world has allowed this to happen, and that Israel is allowing this to happen. Netanya, who is the point at which the obstruction is happening, she said, he needs to look at

what he is doing and change his position. The four Palestinians were killed when troops opened fire on a crowd that was headed to a site run by the Israeli backed American contractor Gaza Humananitarian Foundation, or GHF. It occurred hundreds of meters away from the site, said eyewitnesses. The gunfire was indiscriminate. They said the shooting happened while many people fled. Some people fell to the ground after being shot. The Israeli military and GHF did not immediately respond to

requests for comment. Since GHF first began operating nearly three months ago, the UN says hundreds of Miusettings have been shot and killed by Israeli defense forces and foreign military contractors at or near its aid sites, and we've had one former marine who is working for GHF as a contractor has gone on record talking about the murder of civilians who are trying to get food, that he saw

it happening all the time. Of course, we've had a lot of doctors who have volunteered to help people talk about not just a double tap strike with bombing or missiles on a hospital, but double tap strikes on children, and physicians say, shot once in the chest and then while they were down, they hit them a second time in the head to make sure they were dead. And

these were children. More than two thousand pal Stings have been killed more than thirteen five hundred wounded while seeking aid at food distribution points or along the convoy routes used by the UN and other aid groups. According to Gaza's health ministry, that is there. Well again, nettnaw Whuo is winning in Gaza, but he is losing public opinion in the West. And this is why they are pushing so hard to destroy our First Amendment and using Trump to do it. And of course Trump has no respect

for the First Amendment. It is simply about the tribal politics that he supports. We are going to do. You want to do some of the comments before we.

at this point, so you're getting a great value for money. There. There's David Knight dot Gold, which Tony rdburn has kindly set up. He's got Wolfpack where you can sign up for a monthly subscription and get gold or silver. It's a good way to get outside the Fiat monetary system. There's urnc store dot com where again with promo code Night, you get ten percent off their products. They can help you with your health and hopefully stay outside of the medical industrial complex.

go to Homestead Products dot shop. They have a numerous number of products that you might need in your life, might want, and you can support a good business which is very very pro liberty.

You want to have a hard copy of it. You want to learn to start, how to defend yourself in your community, how to find water, how to protect your supplies. You don't want to be caught in a scenario where you don't know how to do these things. You don't want to be put in a scenario where you have to make some kind of choice where it's either your family or someone else. You don't want to be put in that situation. You don't want to be the guy has to make that immoral choice.

But the first public, like large donation that he made was a million dollars to Andrew Yang when Yang was running for president, and his key issue and only issue at that point in time, Yang's was was universal basic income. And Musk is adamant about that and still is. He's still talking about it, except he's now changed it from universal basic income to universal high income. I think of reminds me of George Carlin, who said they call it the American dream because you've got to be asleep to

believe it. If you believe that this is going to be high income, you must be high in order to believe that.

about Silicon Valley. He said they are neo Marxists, just like Carl Marx fantasized and said with the Industrial Revolution, we have so much material wealth and manufacturing capacity that there is no need for anybody to be poor. We just need to make sure that the government can redistribute income to people adequately. And that is now what the people that George Gilder calls the neo Marxist of Silicon Valley.

That's what they're selling everybody, and it is a lie, just like it's a lie that the universal income is going to be high. If they give you something, it will be very basic, a very basic life that's going to be there anyway. That's the way they're selling this. Now, that's the way that Sam Maltman is doing it as well. Musk has framed this not as a handout but as a societal adaptation to technological progress, a way to create a prosperous star Trek future rather than a negative terminator one.

Well Bloomberg was harping on the same thing as well, Michael Bloomberg when he ran for president, and he was saying, we have to do it so they don't come after us with guillotines. So the terminator future is where humanity rises up and comes after the the artellect masters that are out there, the artificial intelligence masters. Os Hugo de Garis, he had it spot on at the very beginning. He realized that it was going to be a war of the human elites against the rest of humanity, and they

were going to use artificial intelligence as their weapon. Society could become fragmented. Individuals could suffer from depression as they no longer feel a meaning or a purpose in their lives. Said Elon Musk As if your job right now that so many people have is working at a fast food joiner, does that give meaning to your life? That's not giving means to life. But meaning in our lives is not

based on the job that we have. It's based on our relationships with people that we have, and our relationships with God the things that give us meaning, and we should not be looking to people like Elon Musk, Michael Bloomberg, Sam Altman, or Trump for clues about what is meaningful in life. These are people who have absolutely no meaning in their life. They have focused, and they're very good at it. They have focused on accumulating money. And what is the profit a man to gain the entire world

and lose his own soul? That question of two thousand years ago has never been more appropriate to ask each and every one of these would be masters of our lives here. So if the computer can do it, and the robots can do it, and they can do everything better than you, then does your life have meaning? Well, it's clear that our life has no meaning to Musk to the rest of these billionaires, they think that they should be our masters, and they think their life is meaningless.

Tech leaders say that revenue can be shared under a massive wealth redistribution system. Suddenly, an idea that was once seen as a socialist policy that would reward idleness is one of Ai Boom's hottest acronyms. And I just see this as yet another socialist utopian experiment like the Aneida

community up in New York or whatever. Sam Altman says he now thinks that instead of money, everyone could get an ownership share and whatever the AI creates that would allow the wealth accumulated by AI to be spread across the population, he said, calling the idea universal extreme wealth. There we go, ue w sounds like an Arab country.

of the workforce at his company is now AI. He is an evangelist for universal basic income and said in The Pandemic that he saw the COVID nineteen stimulus checks from Trump as a model for broader income distribution. That's what I said. At the same time in twenty twenty, I said, this is programming for people. It is it is moving the overturn window. Now here's the questions. Okay, and this is a good, good question to ask these people.

If jobs are obsolete, then we have to assume that raw materials mind themselves, that no one is needed to form that energy is free and unlimited. And yet that is not the case for their data centers, is it? In this scenario, How does anyone get paid anything? Who is paying whom and with what money are they paying?

Where does the electricity come from to power the AI? Well, of course it'll be the Federal Reserve and tariffs, right, all this magic stuff, magic money, And this is the magic monetary theory of the technocracy is that we are all just going to have universal income, whether it is basic, high, or extreme, it's just all going to show up someday. And we've been saying this from the very beginning. You

go back and look at what Henry Ford said. He said he wanted to with mass production to make the cars cheaply enough that the people who worked in his factory making the cars could afford to own a car. But if we don't have any jobs, who are they producing stuff for and who are they giving it to? Well, I think the obvious answer is to the few people who own everything, all the robots will be working for them.

They will not be working for you. Their task is going to be to control and to contain you, to make sure that you don't learn anything useful. And that's where the AI has a very unique role in terms of its psychological aspects of control, keep you from having any aspirations, to keep you from doing anything different, to pacify you. And that's why these universal welfare programs are

so dangerous. When you go back, and I've mentioned this before, Charles Murray and his book Losing Ground, talking about how damaging the War on Poverty had been to families and poor communities, and how devastating it had been creating dependency and all the rest of this stuff that was used for welfare reform by the Reagan administration. That was philosophically

what they referred to. But now even Charles Murray, who wrote the book Dumbing Us Down, now he is a cheerleader for universal basic income, which is nothing other than welfare done universally. Musk's groc said that Elon Musk Universal high income theory suggests that advanced AI and automation could eliminate the need for traditional jobs. That's what the writer did. He asked Groc, how silly is Musk's universal high income theory, and it said, well, it is a bold and speculative

idea that incites both intrigue and skepticism. Whether it is silly depends on how one evaluates its feasibility. Economic implications are underlying assumptions. The silliness likely stems from the lack of a concrete plan. Musk's predictions, spanning from twenty sixteen to twenty twenty five, remain vague on implementation. How do we fund universal high income? How do we manage societal transition?

How do we address inequality during the shift? Without specifics at risks being dismissed as utopian optimism, especially given his track record of ambitious and sometimes delayed promises. That's his own large language model summing up the man, which is and he said, if no one is working, tell me who is going to be paying the taxes and who is buying what and with what money? And Groc says

that is a good question. It highlights a potential circular logic flaw in the universal high income concept, especially in a fully jobless scenario where Ai handles all production and then Mish writes here Altman, Musk and Benioff describe a world in which everyone is useless. Everyone gets free money, but where does the money come from? Again, this is the technocrafts version of the modern monetary theory or the magic money tree. Let's assume that tempers of the people

are not useless. How do they get paid from the free money that they give to everyone else. This doesn't scale, and no one can say where the money will come from. We'll see all of the money, all of the wealth, is to come from all of us and go to the handful of billionaires that want to own everything. This is a socialist mecca. No one has any money, no one gets paid, everyone shares the wealth. It's kind of

like the paraphrase of the criticism of the communists. So they would say, well, the Soviet Union, they pretend to pay us, and we pretend to work. Except I guess nobody's going to pretend anymore. So there's not gonna be any payment, and it's not gonna be work. No one can explain how anything gets produced, because like in socialism, nothing gets produced. That's the hallmark of it. It's just like you take a look at some of the Scandinavian countries.

They have been living off of the accumulated capital of previous generations prior to socialism. They're getting poor and poor as time goes on, and that is going to happen to all of us.

yet they're doing fine. So surely socialism will work. But if you look at it, the actual amount of money that they spend per person on these government handout programs is less then we're currently spending purpose in America currently, it's just that less people are taking advantage of these socialist things there, and that they don't have all the same socialist stuff that we have here. So it is actually less socialists in terms of the actual amount of money being spent.

the system. This is all about collapsing the system, and this is about these guys coming out on top afterwards. That's one of the reasons why they're pushing this so much.

the first Industrial Revolution to the rise of AI. This book shows how the hollowing out of humanity has been a long game and how our very soul is now at stake. Against the Machine is a spiritual manual for dissonance in the technological age, and I think that J. R. R. Tolkien has a great deal to talk to us about that as well. That was one of his themes that he always kept arkening back to.

to it because he loves those characters the most. He sees them as you know, the true you know, uh sees himself in them.

people's souls as much well. Scientists say that they have now created talk about a machine, scientists say they've now created a new form of life. They claim, this is their phrase, it is more perfect than the one that nature made. Well, Nature never made any life. Nature is not a conscious thought. There's not any intelligence there. It has to be an intelligence, conscience that manufactured. And this is all about DNA. And it's amazing to me to see how people who are involved in DNA and look

at this code and how complex it is. They spend decades to try to decode a small part of it, and then, of course did they get it right. You know, we've heard for the longest time the Human Genome projects said so much of the DNA there is just chunk. That means that they don't understand what it is.

was perfect. God has now changed the world twice. We're now in the third revision. We've had the fall as well as the flood, and in both of those he cursed us. And so what we're seeing now is not what he originally created, but he is going to restore that. Scientists at the Medical Research Council's Lab of Molecular Biology say they've engineered a bacteria whose genetic code is more efficient than any other life form on Earth. They call it Sen fifty seven. They could call it meaning synthesis,

but they're going to break it down. That's why end they could just call it original sin. Maybe there's a bioengineered strain of E. Coli. Yeah, and they's great. That's the first thing they want to do is create more E. Coli. That's that's your scientists for you today. They say it uses seven less codons than the than all life on Earth. A codon, put simply, is a three letter sequence that is found in DNA and RNA, which delivers instructions for

amino acids, a fundamental building block of life. All of this is a code. All of it is design. And you know, it's amazing when they look at this. I grew up where biology it was all about skeletons. It was all about you know, comparative anatomy was Oh, look, there's the similarity between different skeletons. That means that evolved one from the other. It's like, now you don't have

any transitional forms. Now they look at this and they look at DNA, and what utter fools they have made of themselves to think that this is a complex computer code that has error correction all the rest of the stuff. But it just happened.

They realize, they said, that evolution had not resulted in perfect efficiency. Since some of the codons were clearly redundant, was there room to trim some thing? So in twenty ten, a team of twenty four researchers detailed the steps to take to create the world's first synthetic bacteria cell, and it took them fifteen years. Then in twenty nineteen, genetic researchers in Cambridge University reworked an E. Coli strain down to sixty one codons, showing they could do it with

less than the sixty four. But now they've taken it even further to make send fifty seven. The researchers went through the painstaking process say this, of altering over one hundred and one thousand lines of genetic code, first in

theory and then in practice. Yeah, they want you to believe if you stopped to think about it, one hundred and one thousand lines of code, if you saw a computer program like that, would your first instinct be, well, I think that just happened by accident, or would you say somebody wrote that this is I mean, these people are utter fools to try to push this, and don't let them fool you to believe that one hundred one thousand lines of code could just happen spontaneously and accidentally.

point to skeletons and stuff. That's not the biology that is the reality of life. The reality is that if you start to look at these animals as irreducibly complex, you start to see the true functionality that's built into them. And it truly is a wonder if you look at the reality of what's there instead of looking at the dead skeletons. If you look at, for example, the woodpecker

and the things that make it unique. It's got a beak that's very hard, and it has shock absorbers for its brain because it's going to beat its beak against the tree. It's got feet that allow it to hook on vertically while it's doing all of this stuff. And then once it drills a hole, it's got a very long, sticky tongue to go through and to get the insects out of there. If you take away any one of those aspects, you've now got an animal that doesn't work.

So it's not only designed at the lowest level of DNA, but that DNA creates a unique set of features that creates a unique functional animal like a woodpecker. Same thing you see with a giraffe, for example. If you stop and think about the giraffe as high as its head is and the hydraulics involved in all of this. Once a giraffe bends down to try to get a drink of water, for example, all that blood is going to

rush to its brain. But there is a special device that only the giraffe has that will stop that from causing it to black out from the rush brain of blood coming to its brain. You see these types of things all through nature, and each and every creature is uniquely designed, irreducibly complex. So there's so many things in nature that God has created that show his handiwork and

showed the design that's there. But these people say, well, we definitely went through these periods where we were like, well, will this be a dead end or will we see this through? They said, you can start to exploring what will life tolerate again, thinking that life and nature are these things out there that have intelligence and the ability to design things. And they said, we found out that life still works well in the beginning, it wasn't life.

But in the beginning it was logos, right, And when we look at logos, logos, that actual word talks about intelligence. And if you look at the Greek word, it's also structure. It's things like word and reason and rationale and logic and argument. All those were involved there because that's what embodied what God was. In the beginning, there was logos, and logos was with God, and logos was God. That's what the Bible teaches us. And Logos was life. Christ

was life, and the light of man. This is these people who are operating in darkness. Well, Brian Shall Hobby has something along the same lines. He says, what is the difference between life and lifeless? Has new technology actually improved our lives? And in it he talks about First Corinthians and the example that is there, And if you look at that article, as we can pull that up, he's got a picture of people playing musical instruments. Because that's the analogy that Paul uses when he writes to

the Corinthians. Even in the case of lifeless things, he says, that makes sounds such as a flute or a harp, they have anyone, how will anyone know what tune is being played unless there's a distinction in the notes. In other words, these musical instruments are lifeless things. The flute has no life in it, the heart has no life in it. But it's the person who has lifefe who makes these things come to life. And that is the analogy for artificial intelligences. It does not have any life

in it. It is a fake intelligence. It's being animated by either actual Indians. It's going to be used by the governments and the technocrats are going to be behind this to control you. And what they're trying to do folks right now is they're trying to create a mythology that these machines are intelligent, that they're self aware, that they're a new form of life, that they are evolving, and all the rest of this stuff, because they don't want you to see the man behind the curtain pulling

the levers like the Wizard of Oz. And so our job, your job as well as mine, is to pull back that curtain and to show these people are moving the levers so we do not get deceived by what This is a big part of this, as Brainshaw Hoby points out, this worldview that they're selling you of AI predicated on

this long evolutionary worldview that they've been putting out. He said, The predominant belief in Western culture that is fueling this current generative AI spending frenzy and creating perhaps the largest financial budget of modern times is the belief in Darwinian evolution. You know, maybe what we should do is instead of maybe the way we ought to refer to this AI, since it's a bubble, maybe we ought to call it the bubble of Babel, because it is very much like

the Tower of Babel. It is something that first of all, allows people of different languages to be able to communicate more effectively with each other, which is what really was going on with the Tower of Babel. And it also is mankind trying to play God, trying to play God saying that we're going to create this new superintelligence and

all the rest of this stuff. So, as he points out, Darwinism has conditioned the generals their life today in Western culture to believe that electronic technology is constantly evolving and improving life and improving the world. Is that really what is happening in your life? So it's higher forms of human beings have not evolved in the real world, in spite of the rapid advancement of electronic technology of the

last couple of centuries. Superhumans only exist in fantasy, such as the Zionists controlled Marvel Studios and their blockbuster movies in the past couple of decades, portraying superhumans as they condition their audience to accept eugenics and Darwinism through propaganda entertainment. Of course, there's a lot of different bad subtexts that

were in the Marvel movies, aren't there. I mean, when you look at X men and stuff that is like, you know, well, we are super We're better than everybody else. And there was this LGBT analogy that they were pretty obviously trying to stick in there.

out many times, Netanyahu hates his own people. He partnered with Pfiser and said, we will get collect data and use the Israelis that he was governing, will use them as labrats if you put us at the front of the list and give us the shot first. I mean he offered up his own people. Think about that as labrats. No wonder that he has no problem pushing genocide against

other people. So he points out Darwinism has developed into the belief system of transhumanism, because of course it's just the next evolutionary step to merge with machines and the singularity, right, and that is what's fundamentally behind it. And you need to stop and pull back and think about the worldviews that are being sold to you through things like entertainment.

You know, you can go back and look at Star Wars and you can see a lot of Buddhism that is involved in that, you know, becoming one with a force and all the rest of that stuff that so many different philosophical and religious elements in that that you need to be able to identify instead of just naively

and passively consuming entertainment. It's fine to to, you know, look at it as a superficial level, but especially if you have children, you need to address some of the underlying things that are affecting the way that they view the world, and you need to address those things specifically. And so we have had Hollywood selling us the idea

of transhumanism and the singularity. Of course they've been selling us this whole idea of UFOs and all the which is also something else that has grown out of this

Darwinian evolutionary mindset. The concept of transhumanism, belief that biological humans can integrate with electronic computers to create a new quote unquote species, was introduced by the World Economic Forum around twenty sixteen as part of their Fourth Industrial Revolution, and the term transhumanism, I think was actually coined by Julian Huxley, brother of Oldest Huxley. This brave new garbage

that they've been trying to sell us. And whenever I look at their Fourth Industrial Revolution, the way Klaus Schwab would say, it'd always be the forced Industrial Revolution, Like you would say.

was done intentionally. You know, when you look at a car, you know that somebody intentionally had an intention and deliberately made that car. And so design is when you see design when you can understand that there is intention and not just random factors that have come together for something. That's the cue.

what was going on with their own DNA. You know, you look at the complicated code in your DNA, and they're still doing it. Even to this day, they still ignore that, and they're still looking for some kind of extraterrestrial intelligence that is not really very intelligent.

by AI. Think of the knowledge that was lost at the Tower of Babbel, which was the last time the world had a singular world government and a singular world language. People before the flood lived to be almost one thousand years old. In the knowledge and wisdom that they would

have passed on from generation generation is truly unfathomable today. Yeah, when you stop and think about it, if you didn't have diminished physical and mental capabilities that come with age, think about how intelligent I mean we've talked about this with octopus for example. You know the fact that they only live like what three years or something? But look at how incredibly smart they are. They could be They

could be a real threat with a longer lifespan. Well, that certainly is true of humans, isn't it.

of modern technological crutches that we have today. I mean, stop and think somebody like Einstein or somebody like Newton. Imagine if they live to be a thousand years old, what they could have put together. It truly is amazing. But it also makes me think when he puts it this way with brianchall, how he does you know, did they need to have anything any crutches to remember this stuff? Right? We congratulate ourselves because we've created computers and other things

like that as crutches. It makes me think of the Christopher Nolan movie Memento, right where you get this guy who's lost his ability to create new memories, and so as things are going on, he's leaving notes everywhere for his later self to come back and discover, and so the post it's kind of become his memory. That's really kind of what we're doing with computers now, isn't it.

can be entertained, we can be fascinated by illusions. You know how in the world they do that. We can do the same thing with Ai. We can say, how in the world could it put this kind of stuff together, and just don't let it become a reference source for you and don't fall into the idea that this thing is real. Understand there is a man behind the curtain, and that man is trying to steal everything in your life from you and from your descendants, and he's trying

to imprison and kill you. That's the way to properly understand this, that the Wizard of Oz is truly evil and the Wizard of Ai. And I think also the fact that you know, when we look at the original Tower of Babbel, it stopped when God changed the languages here. But I think what we're going to have with this bubble, the bubble of Babel, I think that's going to burst. That's the way this thing is going to come down, and it's going to be financial and in many other regards.

It's going to have massive implications for us. I think when this artificial bubble that they have built collapses. Brian schaw Harby says, these people have failed to acknowledge that it was their master who corrupted the world from the perfect, original design and the original intention of the Creator. Yeah, they are serving the Master who has been the enemy

of humans from the Garden of beaten On. In opposition to modern teaching on Darwinism and technology that promotes things like eugenics and transhumanism, the teaching of the Bible clearly shows that the physical world is wearing out and will soon be destroyed by fire and then replaced. In the beginning, as hebrews, a Lord, you laid the foundation of the earth. The heavens are the work of your hands. They will perish, but you will remain. They will all wear out like

a garment. You will roll them up like a robe. Like a garment. They will be changed, but you remain the same, and your ears will never end. The day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar, and the elements will be destroyed by fire. That's what we need to keep in mind. The concepts of transhumanism in the Fourth Industrial Revolution presented

by the World Economic Forum almost ten years ago. There's been a notable chain and the presentation of transhumanism since the introduction of cht GPT. We now have software that is very, very energy hungry and not sustainable quite frankly, unless they take everything from us. And they're in the process of doing that. Your electricity rates and are soaring everywhere. This is actually AI and the data centers are becoming a bigger threat to your ability to have electricity and

power than actually the climate mcguffin was. It's rolling out much faster with that because they want it for control. There's now widespread belief amongst the public that a computer powered by AI can completely replace man, which means that they no longer even need a transhuman you know. Just think about this. The fear of our AI takeover folks is based on the lie of evolution. It's based on the lie of man becoming God. This is why you don't need to fear what is happening, because it's all

a lie. And so just understand where your future lies. It does not God is the one who's going to control the future. And all of these dire predictions about taking your jobs and taking everything away from you or AI that is going to be doing this, or that it's really going to be the humans behind it. We need to be aware of the humans and how they're going to use this. But it's not going to be

ai AI will be their artificial illusion for tyranny. The idea that human like robots can now replace humans is a common theme in both corporate and alternative media these days. Brian Schall Hobby says, I've tried my best for the past few years to show how fake this belief is. But the propaganda and the deception of two hundred years of Darwinian academics has almost completely blinded the eyes of

the current generations alive today on planet Earth. As I said before, it's also that Darwinism also includes the UFO illusion and Project Bluebeam or whatever they're going to do with that. Communications and language or characteristics of life that's created by God. Lifeless things created by man need human intervention for them to have any meaning at all, just like a musical instrument that by themselves does not have the power or the ability to communicate or to make music.

And again that quote that I read you before, saying that a lifeless thing like a flute or a harp needs somebody to breathe life into it. He says, So unless you speak intelligent, intelligible words with your tongue, how will anyone know what you're saying? You'll just be speaking

into the air like an AI chatbot. That's hallucinating. When one considers the truth that are being written here, it's very easy to see that people's false beliefs and AI and robots replacing humans would be the same as if people started worshiping musical instruments attributing consciousness to those instruments if they were playing themselves. Can a player piano replicate humans so that human musicians are no longer needed to

create music? You know? We get to that in some regard with MIDI, which is the way I do the music that I do. There's recorded instruments and if you look at the MIDI controllers, that actually looks like the piano role that you have on a player piano. But it's telling the instrument how to play and what to play and the timing that it's going to play. But still there has to be a human that's going to create the instrument and a human that's going to program it.

in a different way, in a creative way. And I would say, you know, when we do it with music, there's programs out there like Suno where you just give it a prompt and you say, give me something in this particular style with these instruments, and I'll just go through and create some derivative piece of work, which usually is not very good. But the other thing that you can do with it is you can and not so much Ai. I was talking about Midi. That really wasn't Ai.

But now they have brought AI in to be able to actually sing words. But you still program it, you know, which is still still your lyrics. It's still you doing the midi, but now for the first time, rather than having a large choir that somebody has recorded that's singing or or this, you know, some other syllable and not really singing anything of any intelligence, now you can get it to actually do the lyrics. And I've been playing

around with that, and there is a tremendous amount. When you look at that, you realize just how much is done effortlessly by somebody who can sing. If you can't sing, then it becomes even more difficult than learning to sing in many cases, because you wind up with strange pronunciation and other things like that, and you have to do workarounds. And that's the key. These programs as they stand right now give you the ability to go in and to

change it and find detail. So you give it the words and it pronounces the words, and then when it gets the pronunciation wrong or it gets the inflection wrong, you go in and micro manage that. So it can be a lot of work, but it can also give you access to a creative process that you couldn't have if you couldn't sing, or if you were somebody who wanted to put together a large ensemble, but you couldn't afford to hire the musicians to do it. And now you can do that with a great deal of work

on your own. But anyway, he said, to be just as foolish to think that, you know, when we look at AI and we think that it's actually thinking, it would just be be just as foolish as thinking that the instruments are playing themselves. They don't play themselves, and

yet we are looking at that. He goes on to say that when you look at lifeless, the word that was used there in Greek was essentially the word for soul as life, but it has an A in front of it, right, just like we see atheist is somebody who denies that there's a guy to put the a in front of it, right, And so it was a word that had an A in front of soul to deny that it had a soul, that it had life. And he said, uh, these lifeless things a man made

instruments or tech tools that have no soul. And that's exactly what AI large language models are.

know how it works. We need to know who is working it. That's the key thing. People wrongly ascribe life and consciousness to AI. So, as he points out again going back to the idea of soul, I've said many times when we look at psychology, right, uh, these are atheists who refer to the soul and they study it. You know, psychology is literally the study of the soul. Except these are people who deny that you have a soul. And he said Western culture completely ignores the existence of souls.

They reduce man to a physical entity that operates like a computer, like how technology works. And just like you see that, especially in bef Skinner's work, he believes that people are souls they're not committed, they're not creating the image of God, and he can control them like he does a machine. And that's what his behavioral psycholog is ultimately about. It's about controlling people like he would control

a machine. And that's what's so dehumanizing about it. And that's why he calls his book Beyond Freedom and Dignity. You can you know, you can take those things away from people, but you can't separate them. Life is now defined by ease and comfort, which is mistakenly interpretated as wealth.

This is this false belief, says Brian. That is not only the false belief that technology is making our lives better, but the ignorance of the masses as to what life actually is that is empowering the technocrasts today as they spend trillions on AI and waste our natural resources to

make us poor, to make us their servants. That's why I say, you know, when Elon Musk talks about the fact that will you have meaning in your life if you don't have a job, they really don't understand what life is, and they understand what gives meaning to life is that many times, Counting used to always talk about the politics of meaning you know, politics gave meaning to her, and we don't need to envy those people, and we don't need to emulate them either. We should transcend them.

And the way that we do that is with God and our connection to God. Technology is lifeless. It doesn't produce anything. You can only be powered by those who have life and a soul. Even things like genetic engineering. He said, if you look at GMO fruits and vegetables, they only alter a plant within its kind. Genetic engineering technology, for example, has never taken a seed from one specie and modify it to evolve into a completely different specie.

That's what they're trying to hint that they're doing.

But the finch is still a finch. It's not even changing from a finch into a sparrow or a hawk. It's still an exactly exact same type of bird.

Therefore they have evolved into another specie by definition. So see, there we have evolution and it's absolute nonsense. I mean, it's still physically identified identical to each other.

It's not new information. The fish isn't growing legs, it's getting rid of its eyes.

serious things. This is one of the things that makes it difficult to pin this down, that kind of individual variation. And so what happens is with these pesticides, for example, they kill out a large portion of the original population, but some of them are not affected, and the ones who survived that then multiply and now you've got a new population that's not affected by that poison. So it did not evolve into some kind of a super bug

or a super rodent or something like that. It's just we need to understand that when they're constantly hitting us with these lies about molecules demand evolution. But speaking of lies, again, that's the key thing. Take control of your children's education. The purpose of your education is to point them towards God.

this together fighting this. They call these things the sustainable community schools that should give you an idea of where this is coming from. The un Chicago's government school system is doubling down to take over more and more functions that were once reserved for families, voluntary associations, and churches.

spontaneously out of water. You know, how many tools to be able to even observe from the British Museum, Yeah, yeah, But he said that one of the problems that bugged him in his theory was the eye of the human eye and every eye of every creature. You know, how could something even he could understand with his limited tools that he had, he understood how complicated the eye was, because how is it adjusting the size of the iris in response to light and all the rest of stuff.

He said, how could that happen just by random chance processes? So to him, that was this black box that really was a stumbling block for him with his theory of evolution, and Michael Bahey wrote an early work talking about intelligent design from that standpoint, and that's what he toddled. It was Darwin's black box, which is what intelligence is really about.

they are on the same level as Beethoven. Well, you know, a little delusion now and then.

a mouse? They can squeeze into anything. If they start developing useless wings that don't allow them to fly, but make it harder for them to get into things, they become more vulnerable to predators. Rather than it has to all happen all at once, and that's.

thirty four million dollars. This is a bankrupt system, folks, with bankrupt ideas. The idea behind sustainable community schools is to provide what government educators refer to as more services, even wrap around services. Yeah, this is a government that wraps around you like a book constrictor isn't it. Under the so called village model, everything from mental health and dental health to nutrition and quote family well being becomes

the government school's responsibility. Think of them as parental and church replacement centers within the institutions. Everything for children, but the bedtime stories and the good night hugs for now

become the responsibility of the state. Even parents can receive myriad services from the government schools as they become the new community hub, more access to resources for jobs, housing, said radical left wing mayor Brandon Johnson at a press conference announcing this massive expansion of the controversial program, as if it were government's job to feed and to house the population. The school graduated about two thirds of its victims in four years. Those students are victims of this system.

But the Illinois State Board of Education data shows that even though two thirds of the victims graduating four years, the school did not have one single student that was proficient and either reading or math on standardized tests. Isn't that amazing? So they're graduating these victims, but they can't read and can't write proficiently.

increase that you're putting in there. They said they couldn't produce even a single student proficient in any core subject, worse even than traditional government schools. Almost eighty percent of students were chronically absent at the academy as well showing up there. This is why I say to people who are afraid to take on homeschooling, folks, you can't possibly do worse than the government in terms of any of these aspects, in terms of reading or arithmetic or anything

else like that. There's no way that you could do worse. Even if you've struggled in school, you can do better, and many things out there to help you to do that.

Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com