¶ Intro / Opening
Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the twenty eighth of May. You're of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, we're going to take a look at some politics today. I thought it was very interesting to see Trump and RFK Junior at the Libertarian Party convention. They had some interesting things to say, and even the Libertarian Party gives us some examples that we can
learn from. As I've said many times, I think it's a mistake to focus so much on centralized government solutions, and I see that even being done by the Libertarians. But there were some issues that were brought up. One of the reasons I said, not an RFK supporter never was, but I said the fact that he had been included would be interesting to talk about some of the issues. And so there were some issues that were talked about.
Of course, the biggest issue was Trump's ego. We'll leave back. We're going to talk first though about Memorial Day and some of the news revolving that. Where did it come from and what happened. We'll be right back right
¶ Listener questions(27:25) (56:27) (2:32:00) Thank you to mail donors, and listener comments and emails "Pothole Pete Booty-gay" says turbulence is caused by "climate change"(which we know, of course, is caused by cow flatulence) and CBS anchor laughs in his face when he tries to explain why $7.5 BILLION for chargers has only resulted in 7 new chargers.
and we've already got a tip on Rumble, Thank you very much, Marty. I really do appreciate that. By the way, we'll talk about this later and get a list of some people who sent checks. I don't have my list yet of people who've sent zell and other things, but I will mention that later. We're up to we've moved the needle up or we'll be moving the needle up to one past half to five eighths. So things are really low this month. We really do appreciate the tip, Marty, thank
you very much. And on Rumble Texas, JFK mindset says David and Travis, what are both of your favorite cars and trucks? If you could choose one vehicle and money was no concern. You got your answer, Travis, I know mine. I've always thought the mid nineties portion nine four four looks really nice. Okay, all right, well mine would be the one that I've got. I've changed to. There were a couple of things I didn't like about the third generation Miata, and so I changed those And I just
want to let everybody know it's a good time talk about that. I had a friend from the broadcast, Bob, who was in Texas, a mechanic and he offered to fix. I said, no, no, don't drive all away from Texas fix this car. I really appreciate that, but he said, no, I got to go up to the northeast to pick up a diesel that I'm going to picking up some diesel cars and fixing them and reselling them. And so he said, I've got one up there, and I got one in South Carolina. But I can't pull two of them at
the same time. So he says, I'll bring that one there, leave it there, take off the head and remachine that when I go back to Austin, you know, take the go down to South Carolina, pick that one up and take it Austin, and then I'll bring the finished one back and take the first car back home, which is what he did. I'm not driving it yet because I need to get tired for it. We're waiting at it. Who Like I said, donations have been a bit thin,
so it's it's still setting there. But I made a lot of changes to it. I didn't like the looks of the front. I got a different bumper that I put on it, and I changed things with the suspension, which was already good, and made it even better. I haven't done anything with the engine because I'm not interested in going super fast. I you know, it's about it. It's a momentum car, like the handling. So thanks for asking. Yeah, it's it's a lot of fun. It's just
a perfect car. It had all the best aspects of all the different sports cars that I'd had in one in my opinion the CBDC he said, what is their plan in terms of inflation? Are they attempting to reset this? How would this equate to current bank personal accounts? Well, the thing about I don't know the details of what they plan in terms of inflation. I
think they're going to put their dollar strength first. They're going to put that above the best interests of the people, uh and even above the interest of the incumbent. I think. I don't think they're going to get the kinds of interest rate increases that are decreases that people were expecting. It'll be later and probably lesser than what had happened anyway, but that doesn't mean that inflation
is under control. They're not anywhere close to controlling inflation with the interest rates where they are, so I think it's going to get really crazy after the election, especially I don't think inflation is going to slow down even with these high interest rates. For the longest time, Gerald Clinty has been saying it's going to be dragflation. I believe that's true. It's not going to just be stagnant stagflation like we had in the seventies after we had the shock to
the system of OPEK. You know, when you hit energy that propagates throughout the economy, everything is tied to that. It's like adding a massive value add attacks highly inflationary, and it kills people's ability to conduct business. Biden began doing that himself at the very beginning of his administration, attacking our energy, putting in sanctions and other things like that, creating chaos. But his EPA is now just shutting everything now. And the EPA is not just Biden's
EPA, you know. They they are fully on board with the Democrat agenda. But of course the Republicans get in like Trump, they do nothing to stop it. The EPA needs to be killed or it's going to kill us. It's just that simple carthage must be destroyed. The EPA must be destroyed. We've got to get rid of judicial supremacy. We got to get rid of the EPA. But the EPA is now going to shut down the grid.
You know, they've started attacking power plants. They want to even attack our food supply in the name of emissions, just like they've attacked our cars. It's not going to stop this bureaucratic parasite. Just like all parasites do, they keep growing and expanding until they kill the host. And that's what
the EPA and a lot of these bureaucracies are going to do. How is this going to equate the current personal bank accounts, the intention, the long term intention, and I don't know how this is going to the timeframe for which is going to happen, But I do know what they want to do, and what they want to do is get rid of the small and medium sized banks, so they only have the handful of too big to fail tightly
connected to the federal government banks. And so the big banks that are currently debanking people like Bank of America and others will continue on and they'll help facilitate this CBDC. I think they want to bust the economy as much as they can create financial dependence. Offer a CBDC as an incentive, Well, you want the welfare. You want the stimulus check, you got to get it
with CBDC. That was the plan that Gates used in India to push the first one of these universal digital ID things, the odd heart our system in India. That's how he pushed it, pushed it on the poor people. Rock Fan, Dusty Milton. What happens with the consumer debt when the market crashes and they switched to CBDC, Well banks still try to collect Well, I certainly think they will, and I think the government will help them in that. I don't think there's going to be any kind of a debt amnesty
on that kind of stuff. When you look at what they did, they were going to help everybody during the pandemic lockdown, right, So they had the CDC jump in and say, we're going to stop people from being kicked out for not paying their rent. We're going to stop people from being foreclosed upon if they're behind because we shut everything down. We're going to magnanimum excuse
me, magnanimously extend this problem. Is all they did was kick the can down the road, and it was really not so much like a can, but it was like a snowball. That debt that you were into with the banks, and that continued to snowball, and you know when and you had a lot of people that were caught in a squeeze. I talked about it at the time. There were some people who were One case that I remember very well in New York City a Chinese immigrant couple and they were doing menial
labor. They were dishwashers, they were doing housekeeping work, you know, cleaning work and stuff like that. But they had pulled together and scraped their pennies together and they so that they could buy income property. Not just that they were trying to get a house in New York, but they had scraped this together with income property. And what was happening was they had people who were tenants who were not paying their rent. They couldn't evict them, and
so that meant that they had no money to pay this bill. Now, you know, they also would not have foreclosure. But what happened was is just continues the snowball every month and they had no income coming in that they could pay it. So you know, when that came off, they're going to lose their property. That's the type of thing I expect them to do with CBDC. Well, let's talk a little bit about Memorial Day. Where
did it first come from? It was first founded on? Well, okay, we've got one more question here for right now on rumble Marky Mark, New Jersey. Thank you for the tip, he says, Dave. Since there will only be a few TBTF banks left for the too big to fail for the CBDC, what do you think about migrating to a local credit union? Is that a good workaround? I'm with the big banks. I'm concerned.
Get away from the big banks. The big banks are the ones that are instantly debanking people, just like the filmmaker that I talked about last week. And we've seen that happen in the UK as well, and we've seen it happen not just with her, but this has happened to several people. And so get away from the big banks, get with a smaller local bank. They may fail, but you know it's at least when they fail,
there's going to be some FDIC or I think they'll be massive riots. It may mean that you've got a delay in getting your money, but you know, it's another reason why you need to have some cash, need to have gold and silver but you know, keep some cash so you've got some liquidity there in case they do lock down the banks or something for a period of time. That's what happened with the FDIC when they shut down those banks. Member some of the people they're worrying, when am I going to get my
money? Well, they expedited that so that you know, they shut them down to think on a Friday, and they got their money by Monday or Tuesday or something like that. But people are worried about that. Who knows if it's bigger what they're going to do, But just make sure that you've got some emergency money that is there. You'll eventually get it. I think, at least in the first round. Credit unions are probably a good source. And again it's a you know, smaller local type of thing, and
so I would just look for something like that. Make sure that you got gold and silver. Go to David Knight dot Gold. Take you to Tony Rdaban. You can get gold and silver and any large or small you can
put your IRA. If you got one, you can put that in metals and that will be a you know, they will store that for you, but that's actually physical metal that's there in a vault for you, and you can even get into the regular savings program that he's got wolf Pack, which allows you to regularly save a certain amount and also get a bulk buying discounts and save a little bit on the on the purchase price of that. But the power of everybody buying that together. So yeah, it's you know,
I can't tell the future. We can see the general contours up, they don't know the specifics of it. Dougle Luck, thank you very much, And I've got a note from you. I'm going to read in a little bit about Roku Rumble Nmax. Most credit unions signed an agreement with Federal Reserve to go along with their money grab. Well, anybody who is part of this financial system, small banks and all the rest of the stuff, they are, you know, going to go along with it to some degree.
I just what I'm talking about is debanking people. You know, if they collapse the system, they're all going to be a part of that. But you know, when we look at focusing on individuals and that kind of targeted takedown that's going to be coming from the bigger banks, I think primarily and Rumble Marky Mark says Dave ari Bock Silver from Tony will be enrolling a olpipe
soon. Good good David, nightdigol. By the way, you know, Gerald Slinty saw all this stuff coming, warn people about it years in advance, this commercial real estate thing which is the really big threat to the small and medium sized banks as well as to the economy. And I talked about CBDC from the very beginning. He said, yeah, they're going to shut everything down because that's what they're pushing it, from dirty cash to digital track,
from dirty to digital trash. But if you want to get Gerald Slinty's trends journal, you can get that at trends journal dot com. Just use the code night and you can save ten percent there at a trends journal. He's always ahead of the trends. And I've you know, I've been talking to Gerald's silenty for over a decade and he has always got the trends on economics. Let's talk a little bit about Memorial Day. And I thought it was kind of interesting this article from v Dare. They said, you remember
this is founded on North South reconciliation after the Civil War. Remember when we wanted to do something like that, And so I said, when they were pushing through the Insurrection Act, and they were using that against people. And he said, wow, this is put in with the Civil War. And I said, and you notice it was put in after the Civil War. And they never used it. They didn't use it against the President of the Confederacy or any of the generals, none of the soldiers. They didn't use
it against anybody they wanted to. They were tired of war. The casualties had been incredible, especially when you look at it adjusted for the size of the much much much smaller country than at a country that was maybe ten percent of the size that we are. They were having casualties like at Gettysburg over fifty thousand people killed. You just multiply that by ten. Can you imagine five hundred thousand people killed in a day? I mean nine to eleven was
three thousand people. And that was just one battle, a small battle. You would have two or three thousand people killed a small battle. So nobody has seen casualties like that, especially adjusted for the population. And they were tired of it and they didn't want to keep pushing even with this Insurrection Act. Memorial date dates back to the Civil Wars. One of the reasons why November eleventh Remembrance Day. Throughout Western Europe, it's also called Veterans Day.
In the US, November eleventh was our mistic day, was when they ended World War One in nineteen eighteen. But the US already had its own massively destructive interness in war. As a matter of fact, look at that picture that is there the North South Reconciliation, that is on the fiftieth anniversary of Gettysburg. And so they had quite a few survivors. You know, they worked hard, they ate pure food. If they weren't shot in the Civil War, they typically lived to a pretty old age. There's a lot of
audio recordings out there people who were Civil War veterans. But you know, when we look at that, it really was about a country that was tired of war, a country that wanted to heal, unlike our country today. The people who hate Confederates also hate American soldiers who fought in the Civil War, who fought in the Indian Wars, who fought in the Philippine Insurrection, who fought again in Vietnam. We're in the War on Terror because all those
things are about American history, aren't they. Patriots may disagree retrospectively with some decisions to go to war, but we do honor the dead themselves. One dead man we don't think worthy of honor, they said, as Joe Biden, who tweets every Memorial Day about George Floyd. Floyd, an ex convict, a drug addict, chose Memorial Day weekend at twenty twenty to try to pass a counterfeit bill, leading to his arrest and his death probably from a
drug overdose when he resisted arrest. As we have Confederate memorials and statues of Teddy Roosevelt and Christopher Columbus falling memorials to George Floyd Rose. Why because they want to divide us for a civil war, and this civil war they want
to make it along the lines of race. And this is why they are even you know, the statues are the very that they're taking down and the new statues that they're putting up are the very last aspects of this new culture and history that they're pushing on us, and they have pushed on us in the schools. That's one of the final things that they do. You know, when they were taking down Saddam Hussein's statue that was after you've won,
you take down the other side's statue. Just remember that politics is downstream of culture. Culture is downstream of the spiritual war. So this article was on Breitbart, and I thought it was interesting because it's a background to this flag that has been so controversial to the mainstream media, the Revolutionary War flag, an appeal to heaven, a white flag with a green pine tree on it.
Oh, the hatred that they have for that. Why because it's about our history, Because it's about the Revolutionary War, an unsung hero that was involved in part of that. And how dare Alito's wife or sam Alito himself, how dare them fly a flag that was part of the establishment of this country? Because these people hate everything about our country. These Marxists choose to
destroy everything. Countless times, the fate of the nasent American nation dependent on the right person being in the right place at the right time, like the twenty six year old Marvelhead captain James mun Mugford, who captured the largest single prize of the Revolutionary War, the Hope. That's the name of the ship. Mugford captained, the Franklin, one of George Washington's cruisers, and that
ship proudly flew one of America's first flags appeal to heaven. On May tenth, seventeen seventy six, five weeks into her journey across the Atlantic, the Hope, a British two hundred and eighty two ton transport ship carrying a staggering fifteen hundred barrels of priceless gunpowder, mysteriously separated from her eleven ship escort in
a thick fog. Her disappearance was even more suspicious because before her departure from Cork, the flotilla commander had received an anonymous letter questioning the loyalties of the ship's master. Seven days later, American privateer Captain Mugford spotted the lone vessel creeping towards Boston through his spyglass his privateer, the Franklin. By the way, he's a private sailor, private tier. They outsourced this stuff, didn't
have this massive Pentagon bureaucracy. They can't find it's behind anyway. They had set out from Beverly, Massachusetts, two days earlier with only a skeleton crew of twenty one men because the difficulty of recruiting mariners, so they said Mugford had only managed to secure his current crew because he had previously secured wages for a dozen core men. He had the ship the Hope and Sight. The Marble Headers put up the sales for the Franklin to the wind and caught it
up with a heavy British ship. The appeal to Heaven flag fluttering in the wind represented something truly extraordinary. In October seventeen seventy five, shortly after the first of Washington's cruisers left Port to attack the Royal Navy, Joseph Reid suggested to John Glover, what do you think of a flag with a white ground,
a tree in the middle, the motto appeal to Heaven. Congress and Washington were already taking an unprecedented step toward independence and sovereignty and authorizing warships. So flying a separate flag was a monumental leap to independence. And now we are both ignorant and hateful of that heritage. And so they attacked a Supreme Court justice who flies that flag at his house. You know. The other thing that he's accused of doing is flying an American flag upside down after an
election. I think that should be a new tradition. Quite frankly, I thought it was a great idea. I think that'll be our family tradition. Like we said last week, Travis said, I'll have to get an American flag before i can do that. Ignoring the Hopes four and six pounds swivel guns, they courageously boarded the larger vessel and were shocked to find themselves evenly
matched to the crew of eighteen that was on the larger ship. The Hope, even more surprised than Captain Mugford, demanded her manifest from Captain Lunsdale, the fact that it had one thousand carbines at stacks of bayonets, five gun carriages, piles of cartridge box boxes, and astonishing fifteen hundred barrels of gunpowder, enough powder to supply either army's needs for a month. Adding to the appearance of divine providence, the Hope, escorted by Franklin, ran aground just
outside Boston Harbor. Two months earlier, Congress had declared a day of prayer and fasting. Colonial church goers emerged from their respective houses of worship on the designated afternoon of May seventeenth to see the captured ship in the harbor, as if in direct answers to their prayers. Perhaps it was elated. They immediately
began divesting her of her precious cargo and dispersing it. Despite the Crown evacuating Boston a month earlier, two British warships are still lurking outside the Boston Harbor. They saw Mugsford's stranded vessel, and they sent a boarding party to attack the disabled ship. Mugford, who was on the ship The Hope, hailed the boats as they slithered across the black water towards his vessel and answer they called back that they were from Boston. Mugford warned the boarding party keep off,
or I'll fire upon you. He simultaneously commanded his men to ready the guns in order. The anchor cut so the Franklin's broadside and her guns faced the ongoing row boats. Ignoring their pleas not to fire, Mugford fired his musket and the crews of the of Lady Washington and Franklin followed suit, and the musket and cannon balls sailed across the water, tearing into the small boats
as well as the flesh and bone of the men aboard them. They managed to sink two small boats, but before Franklin's cannon could discharge another deadly blast. Some of Lieutenant Harris's men were already aboard Mugford's ship. Mugford and his men peppered the borders with small arms and harpoon spears, even cutting off the hands of soldiers as they laid them on the gunwale. It was brutal. War is always brutal, but it was brutal and up close. There was
no long distance button pushing video monitor war. With this, they were right up close. But of course remote control bombs can blow you apart just as easily as somebody chopping off your hands. But it was a very difficult, different type of war. Mugford was described as having outstretched arms, righteously dealing with death and destruction. Before he received a mortal wound to his chest. They cried out, I'm a dead man, but don't give up the vessel.
You'll be able to beat them off. And beat them off they did, although they lost their beloved captain in the fight. His crew sailed his body back to Marblehead, where thousands thronged to pay their respects, and he was buried with highest honors as the first captain in Washington's Navy to die in combat. Mugford Forever Young turned twenty seven years old on the day of his death. He would never see America declare independance a month and a half later,
But the priceless cargo helped to secure freedom. That's the story of the appeal to Heaven. We'll be right back. Unlike most revolutions, whether people rise against the real economic oppression, in our case, here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle. It is, however, not nearly so abstract as a young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here is one of monopolies. Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in
our country. Tomorrow it will be something else, liberty. It's your move. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, let's talk about the silent civil war of the CIA versus America, the CIA versus you, because that's what this is about, the CIA's secret effort to seize control of social
media. Why, because social media has far more ammunition if they don't control it than that British ship, the Hope that was enough ammunition to supply an army for a month, enough gunpowder there's enough ammunition if people are allowed to speak to shut this government down, and that's what we need. That's why they attack social media. I thought it was interesting this Zeroheage report very detailed about some new things that are being done openly about by the CIA in terms
of its efforts to get control of social media. They don't acknowledge the fact that the CIA was instrumental in the creation of both the DARPA and the CIA instrumental in the creation of both the Internet and social media's I've pointed out many times on this program, but they do see what is happening within. You tell that venture capital firm that was created in the nineties when the hardware caught up to the speed and the bandwidth that they needed in order to do social
media. That was when they went in and they funded all the people who are now in control of the Internet, including those who lost and disappeared.
They created all that They chose the people that would work with them. Zero Hedge says, while the CIA is strictly prohibited from spying on or running clandestine operations against American citizens on US soil, a bombshell new Twitter report reveals that a member of the board of Trustees of in q Tel, the CIA's mission driving venture capital firm, along with former and they always put that in quotes,
right, former intelligence community and CIA analysts. And when you've got somebody that's been with the CIA has got a long history, whatever, are they really former or are they just sheep dip? Now you know what is going on with these people? Yeah, I'm not with the CIA. So the stuff I'm telling is true now, right? They lie, they cheat, they still, they have classes on it. People who've done that all their life and they enjoy doing that characterizes them. Like John Garyacu said, they've
looked for people in the CIA who are sociopaths. He says, they get them right up to the line of psychopath and hopefully don't go over. But there's a few that do go over the line of a psychopath, but to run clandestine operations against American citizens on US. So that's forbidden their edge, So I guess they don't do that, right, Come on, let's not be naive. The PAISA law, the PISA Act, which they don't care
about, which they eviscerated with a Section seven O two. And now Mike Johnson and the Republicans the vast majority of them voted to not only extend it in time, but extend it in scope. This last time, that was there because the CIA and the NSA had been spying on Americans from their inception right after World War Two, and so Frank Church and they Senate and Pike in the in the House held hearings about the CIA and NSA, respectively.
They came up with the Pisa Act. But then these clever devils use the Pisa Acts, specifically the Phis the Court to go in and get search warrants for mister and missus Verizon. They use the section seven oh two to say, well, okay, we're prohibited from looking at anybody other than foreign citizens in foreign countries. They couldn't even look at foreign citizens in the US. But they said, well, if anybody isn't talking to them, we can
intercept that. We can do a couple of hops to people, that type of thing, so they're not constrained by it. As a matter of fact, they actually used it to give themselves legal cover. So it's not surprising to see that they're still at it. Of course, they were still at it. I've been saying this all along, before we knew the Twitter files. We knew who was doing the censorship. It was the US government. Now we've got the documents, and still people don't The Congress still doesn't want
to do anything about that because they're not the government. The CIA is the government of America. Remember that coup that happened in nineteen sixty was it two sixty three? I guess it was? Yeah? Remember that? Well anyway, This is an article by Michael Schellenberger, Matt Taibi, Alex Guttenthagg report at Sellenberger's public According to two thousands of pages of Twitter files and documents, these efforts are part of a broader strategy to manage how information is disseminated and
consumed on social media. That's the ammunition. They want to seize the ammunition. They do it under the guise of combating misinformation and foreign propaganda efforts. This complex of government linked individuals and organizations has gone to great links to suggest the narrative control is a national security issue. Well it is for them. See, national security is not about you. National security is not about keeping you safe. They want you to be killed in a war. They want
your family vaporized in in nuclear warfare. They'll be secure in their underground bunkers. National security is about their job security. National security is about securing their massive empire filled with all these little bureaucrats. Certainly isn't about protecting America or individual Americans. No, you are expendable. As a matter of fact.
They want population reduction and that's the best way to get it. As Paul Eric said in the nineteen sixties before they started the First Earth Day, he said, yeah, we've got to reduce population. Pandemic can do it, sterilization can do it. We can convince people, banned people from having kids and that type of thing. But the ray that you really shut down the population is with a war. Nothing's better than a war for cutting down the
population. So don't talk to me about national security. These people want to kill us. They spy on us, they want to kill us. They want to push us into war. Every day they move closer and closer to this. Now we've got NATO egging on Ukraine. Yeah, those weapons that we gave you, you shoot them into Russia. Come on, come on, do it, do it. They don't need much egging, do they.
A long time Intelligence Community contractor and senior Department of Defense R and D official who spent years to helping technologies to detect whistleblowers like Ed Snowden and WikiLeaks leakers. That was one of the people involved in it. Another one was Jim Baker, who as FBI General Council helped to start the Russia Gate hoax and as Twitter's Deputy General Counsel urged Twitter executive to censor the New York Post
story about Hunter Biden. And then there was a proposed head of the DHS's Aboarded Disinformation Governance Board, Nina jank A Wits, who a lot of people called her Scary Poppins because of her singing what was that a spoonful of sugar? Something helps surveillance go down. Anyway, Jim Baker, in his capacity as FBI General Counsel and later is twitter Is Deputy General Counsel, advocated for
and implemented policies that would restrict certain types of speech on the platform. It's always been, you know, since we go back to twenty eighteen, that's when I got capped. Interesting, I'm still at the same that goes up goes down, It goes up, goes down the manually, you know. Funny through the week it'll go up and throughout on the weekend it goes up, and then on the weekday they remove the ones that we're at it over the weekend. Really strange anyway, It's called free speech, but no reach.
It's called shadow banding, and all the rest of the stuff. It's still there. It's still there. Musk hasn't changed any of that stuff. And I've tweeted about it, and the funny thing was Drudge picked up my tweet thing. Well, Twitter hasn't changed it all for me. I know, he's put in some high profile people to pretend that he supports free speech. He puts in Nick Foontes, right, and it reminds me very much of what the ACLU used to do. The ACLU would not support free speech.
It would not support open ballots or open debates or any of that kind of stuff. I wouldn't support Second Amendment. But boy, the ACLU would support neo Nazis marching in a small Jewish town in Illinois, Skokie, Illinois. They would support that and say look at us, how dedicated to free speech we are. We're all Jewish, but we support Nazis marching and a Jewish community talking about how much they hate them, but they wouldn't do any of the real stuff that was out there. It was a real threat,
just virtue signaling. And I said, that's what Trump, That's what Musk is doing, which Twitter he puts people like Nick Finte's makes a big deal about you know, he's back on the platform. But don't you dare talk about Uh, don't you dare talk about the things that are that they're pushing right now, whatever it is, whatever narrative they don't like, or they will shadow ban you may not kick you off, because you know that'd be bad optics for him. He's got to keep up that pretense that it's about
free speech. Furthermore, companies like PayPal, Amazon, Web Services, Go Daddy mentioned as part of a concerted effort by the CIA to d platform and financially de incentivize individuals and organizations deemed to be threats by the intelligence community. It was only five months after we started this show that PayPal was shut down, and PayPal was really central to this show. For the first five months,
almost all of our donations came through PayPal. First donations that I got, I had an email that was not running through Info Wars so I still had that email forgat. I got the first one from a guy named Chan and he sent and I got this email message that said, you know, you've got some money sent through PayPal. It's like, well, is this some kind of phishing things? Because I don't even have a PayPal account and I didn't and so I looked at it and it's like, well, okay.
He said, if you get this, let me know. You know, I'll be looking to see if you get this, and so I opened up a thing and accepted it and it worked, and then when that went through, he sent me more money, and then other people started sending me money on PayPal, and it was over that weekend, so I thought, well, let me just continue the show. So we continued. It fired
on a Thursday. Got you know, Chan and some other people started sending me money on Friday, because it was like a week before Christmas that I got fired, And so we started on Monday and it's just been run on voluntary donations since then. But after we but almost all of the funding was through PayPal. We weren't set up with any of these other systems like subscribe
star a zell or cash appering that stuff. It was all just through PayPal, and then five months into it, PayPal shut us down, Vemo shut us down, no explanation. I spent two hours on the phone with a guy and he said, well, all I can see is I just said shut this down immediately. Same thing that the filmmaker that we talked to that got debanked at Bank of America said. She talked to the people that they were there and looked at up and said, well, there's no reason given.
They just said shut this down immediately. So we know where this is coming from. It's coming from the CIA, just like all the censorship is. Jank Owitz compared the of regulation of free speech, the lack of regulation of speech on social media the lack of government regulation of automobiles in nineteen sixties. I kind of remember that as a period of wonderful freedom in automobiles, the halcyon days of innovation and affordable cars. People were trying all kinds of
things with the cars. It's what happens when you have a free market. She sees that as a problem. I think that kind of vibrant free market that we had in automobiles in the nineteen sixties was great. She calls for a cross platform and public private approach. So whatever actions are taken or taken by Google, Facebook, and Twitter simultaneously. Yeah, we're not talking about public private. When they talk about public private, they're talking about fascism.
The economic definition of fascism is a merger of government and corporations. And that's what we're talking about. We're talking about a fascist corporatist government. Google, Facebook, and Twitter. These very companies that were created by the CIA and these other venture capital firms that had CIA and NSA and other intelligence community people setting on their board of directors of these venture capital firms doing this on the
platform that was designed by darpest psychologist in the nineteen sixties. JC R. Licklier. Don't tell me this isn't fascism. Don't tell me this isn't corporate fascism. That's the way the global governance is going to be run. They may not even set up some kind of a capital at least not at first.
It'll be a network of these global organizations like Davos and Builderberg and the Club of Rome and all these other things, where they're going to constantly going to these meetings, you know, the World Health Organization, all these different organizations that are that are involved in different aspects, and the politicians and the billionaires and the corporate execusatives and the mass media owners who go to all of these things all the time, as well as the people who are deeply embedded
in the intelligence community. You got David Portraeus, You've got people like Alex scarp always there, a Builderberg and these other places. It's fascism, folks. All this stuff about Trump again is another misdirection. Yeah, he's a fascist, but you know, they don't want to see the bigger picture of corporate fascism that is uniparty involves Biden as well. Every time they talk about public private partnership, it's fascism. The now failed Disinformation Governors Board that she
briefly had. One year after she did that, Jankowitz began working with the anti disinformation consulting firm ALTHEA group that was staffed by quote unquote former intelligence community analysts. Have they resigned? Really? Have they really resigned? Or the sheep dipped right? ALTHEA notably came to z zero Hedge, says zero Hedge at one point shopping a dossier around which was suggested that we were allegedly contributing
to increased online panic amid the monumental collapse of Silicon Valley Bank. The outlets they peddled said dossier. The outlets they peddled SA said dossier too, included Bloomberg, which elected to exclude zero hedge from their report following a brief email exchange. Eventually, one of their operatives dropped the dossier on Twitter, only to be mocked as a propagandist. One guy tweeted out, you mean a financial news blog published a number of stories about a significant bank failure? How
dare they? Yeah, They've got a lot of different things that they would like to cover up at different times, and this kind of stuff, I mean to you, sometimes it's okay to talk about bank failures, other times it's not. And they will decide ALTHEA or Alethia? Is it a? Is Alythia Alythia? I'm sorry it's got an e in that. Well, No, it's written both ways. In here. They've got ALTHEA and they've got alethia, So I don't know which one it is anyway in this article
though they misspelled it somewhere or the other. So the they had a lot of different analysts that were former CIA analysts, supposedly former they're working for that company. We always see that, don't we. And then the evidently it seems like the majority of times they put this in is A L E. T H E A. So I guess it is Alethia in late twenty twenty two. I should look that up. It's probably some kind of horrific pagan mythological character, you know, like Djankowitz. In late twenty twenty two,
Alithia received ten million dollars from Ballistic Ventures. His general partner is Ted Schlein. Ted provides counsel to the US intelligence community, serves on the board of directors at q Tel, and was recently named as a board member of SISA. According to his CV, oh imagine that he checks all these different boxes, doesn't he? Folks, I'm just telling you, you know, we
can use the Internet for our purposes. You're watching this program right now through the Internet, but you know they're going to control the vast majority of it, and they're going to rig it. And you know, there may be some ways that patriots can use artificial intelligence, but for the most part, these tools that they're creating are their tools. They're using them for propaganda for
surveillance for all these things that the CIA does. It's the government that is running this, and it's a sea that's running the government, DARPA and the Department of Defense backed to an AI chip company that is seeking to raise seventy million dollars. As again, you know, when we look at AI, as I said before, AI is about creating dependency of humans dependent on artificial
intelligence. It's about creating trust. So you believe this hallucinating stuff. And again, the best example of why AI can be both brilliant and unbelievably stupid and like they say, hallucinating, it's simply because it's going out there and creating these matrices and comparing them. You know, you're looking for something. When you give it a question, it doesn't see that as a question. It just sees it as something that it's got to match, and then it
goes to its massive database for the best match. That's why I think we talked about it. The Blinker fluid stuff. You know when people say, well, my Blinker, they asked Google Gemini, Blinker is not making any noises. What could be wrong? Well it comes up with a couple of things. Well, check the check, check the fuse that's there, check this relay whatever. And then it comes in like option number three or four is check your blinker fluid. Why does it do that well, because it
doesn't know what it's talking about. It's just going out there and seeing a lot of people who talk about turn signals and jokes about there being something called blinker fluid, and so it just parrots that along with some other things that you know, we're not really that great a suggestion in terms of fixing it, but that's the way the thing works. But what it's really about,
it's about gaining trust. It's about creating dependency. It's about surveilling and controlling information and being able to lie to you and to push their narrative and their propaganda. And they want to do more of it. So DARPA and the Department of Defense are giving seventy million dollars to an AI chip company because they want to have a faster, specialized AI chip. What they're doing with IS chip is that they're putting the memory on board. This is nothing new.
I imagine that it is this that's been done for a long time. I mean, going forty years ago, we were doing stuff like that. But the I imagine this is at a scale that I haven't seen before, right, And they keep talking about how this company that's doing it's called in Charge AI inc e n Charge. So they keep mentioning that this is going to
reduce energy consumption. They mentioned that several times in the article. Yeah, they're using so much computing power that they're going to have their own power grid. They know that the government is taking down the power grid because they're part of it, and so you God, Sam Altman and other people are setting up their own parallel power system that's going to have nuclear energy. We won't do that that you and I won't have access to that. It would be
better off as amish though quite frankly. But anyway, they talk about reduced energy consumption, it's not really about that. I don't think they put the memory on board and always have because the closer you know, when you're talking about things that get really really fast, then it becomes a big deal about
how far the electrons have to travel. Again. You know, forty years ago when I was involved in this, the supercomputers that they were doing, they were starting to put them in a circular configuration, and they're paid amazing amount of attention anywhere that they had to have any kind of wiring. They had to keep that at a minimum, so they brought it into kind of a cylinder type of shape with an open like a slice taken out of it.
You look at the old supercomputers from the seventies and that was simply to keep everything closer. Well, you put all of it on a chip, that's even better. It's really about speed, and that's really what they're doing. But it's also the real intention is about surveillance and data mining. That is really what's going on with all this stuff. When you look at AI.
It's about lies and propaganda. It's about creating dependency, it's about surveillance, it's about data mining all this other stuff about you know, pictures and movies and music and all this other kind of stuff. Yeah, they'll use that to entertain you, but the whole thing is a trap. The startup has already started deploying its chips, which are tailored not for training AI models like those of Open AI or Anthropic, but for applications utilizing these models for
predictive tasks. Predictive tasks, you know, Joe. Spacial intelligence has been around since the late nineties when they started creating it. As they were creating the social media companies, they realized that this is going to be that the technology had caught up and made it practical to do what they had envisioned as
a psychological surveillance and control tool back in the nineteen sixties. And so they had different things in Joe spatial intelligence like AI that didn't mean artificial intelligence. That meant anticipatory intelligence, anticipating what you are going to do. Even going back to the nineteen seventies, the big new Brazinski talked about in his book
Between Two Ages. He said, we're going to have in the technocratic age, we're going to have the ability to predict what you're going to do before you even do it, because we're going to follow your behavior, and we'll know what you want better than you know what you want. And so what they're talking about here is predictive tasks anticipatory intelligence. Going back to Minority Report, they wanted to make these AI computers. If you want to think about
it that way, maybe we should start calling it. Since we've got anticipatory intelligence, since we've got so many different AI acronyms, why don't we just call the AI precogs. Well, we got a wide open border. It's another way for them to declare war on us, more domestic war against America. We'll talk about that. We've actually had some strange encounters. A Navy seal found somebody who was a scope, a foreign national who snuck across the
border, had not been encountered by border patrol. Imagine that people who are deliberately coming in they can and if they are trained, they can evade the border patrol. We've had actually two incidents of that over the weekend, and we'll talk about that when we come back. Just remind people, if you will please like the stream, that is one thing that helps us. We need to get reach. If we can get reached, that will help us
with a contributor base as well. Non Rumble inn Max says Trump's COVID response likely killed more people than most Marxist movements. I agree, and it was something of a Marxist movement itself. And we'll talk about that when we get to Trump addressing the Republican of the Libertarian Party and RK Junior attacking both Trump and Biden. And when I look at that, and we'll get we'll talk about that more coming up. But again, I think that is the importance
of having three people in a debate. You can't just make it about, well, I'm better than that other guy, no matter how much you hate me, I'm better than him, right, And it takes it away from all of this personal ad hominem attacks like professional wrestling on rumble oh and sixty one rights. Eighty five percent of the wires from my brain chip have detached from my brain since im plentation. Now my microwave oven seems to have a wife of its own. There you go, Well, we'll just have to
stick them in deeper next time. I don't know what's happening that first guinea pig for Neurlink his wires detached. Is it just that they're not getting a good signal? Or is this thing free floating somewhere in his cold And I feel sorry for him. It's a desperation that we see with people when it comes to cancer treatment. You know, he's desperate as a quadriplegic, and he's trying to do something, and so I really feel sorry for him.
I look at the designs of this stuff. I don't see it as a you know, this is they would always put those stories out there as DARPA was working on its autonomous robots and its autonomous cars and things like that. In these contests, well, this is so that we can shut down a nuclear power plant that gets out of control. We don't have to have anybody die doing it, and that type of stuff. It's to help little old ladies cross the street. Yeah, that's why they've got the killer robot,
armed dogs and stuff. That's to help little old ladies cross the street. It's like, yeah, right, I see that with an euralink stuff as well. And of course Elion Musk has made it very clear he's all about transhumanism and that's the path he wants us to become cyborgs. If you don't become cyborgs, you're gonna die because our artificial intelligence is going to be so smart. It's the art like war. It's already kicked off the art like war. On rock Fan, carolus Rex, thank you for the tip.
I appreciate, and Eric and Greg Talent thank you very much, all of you. Thank you for the tips on rock Fan and on rock Fan, Michelle Obama, thank you for the tip, and writes Rational lampooner calls them demo democrats rational lampooner instead of national lampooner. We're gonna take a quick break.
We'll be right back. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, let's talk about the border and the drug war, because these two things are tied together, along with domestic gun controls now being tied in with all of that as well, and civil asset forfeiture. You won't believe what California is doing two homeowners that never had anything to do with drugs. There's come
up with a way to use civil asset forfeiture to steal people's homes. You want to talk about how they get us out of our homes, Well, that's one way. It's really heinous, especially when you consider that in California marijuana is legal, and you have they're confiscating people's homes saying that in the past marijuana was being produced in some of these homes. Don't have to prove
it, they just allege it. Steal your home. You have to sue them to get it back, and then they push the court date out for years, five years or whatever. Meanwhile they start accumulating these fines. Is so insidious. You will talk about how criminal our government is, and you want to talk about how you better pay attention to the state and local government. This is a local county that's doing this. So again it's where the rubber meets the road. The counties can be even worse than the states.
States can be worse than the federal government. And so again we don't want to get too caught up in the presidential politics. Wide open border Mexican cartel's presence in the US explodes with Biden more domestic war against America. A veteran says they're taking over drug distribution from local dealers and gangs. And of course with WND they're all on the on board with a drug war and they're going to give you the DEA's side of it. Do they talk about how the
CIA has been involved in this stuff? Too? Known fact, folks, A known fact Gary Webb, and you know, we was talking about how the CIA was had created the crack cocaine epidemic in California, they could fund their secret wars in Central and South America. They killed the messenger with all of that as a matter of fact. You know, when they wanted to
get Gary Webb first wins these journalistic awards because of his reporting. Then they got an entire team from the La Times to destroy him, to target and destroy him with lies and other things like that. So at the heart of this deadliest drug epondemic in American history are two powerful trans national criminal organizations notorious for drug trafficking and violence, and their influences growing dramatically under the Biden administration.
A veteran DEA agent and fentanyl expert tells WND, did he, by the way, mention when he talked about the Cineloa cartel and the Hollisco cartel, did he mention that the Cinaloa cartel, which is l Chopo, was working closely with HSBC. Matt Taive did years ago on Rolling Stone. He said, Yeah, the HSBC even gave them their own window because they had
so much cash they were bringing in that they needed to cash. You're backing up nothing, So they gave them their own special window and they did everything they could. They were convicted multiple times HSBC, but Eric Holder, Obama's Attorney general, said they were too big to jail HSBC, so they gave them teeny tiny fines in terms of the amount of business that they were doing, and allowed them to stay and gave him a fine, put them on
probation, and then they did it again, did it even worse. And we had another whistleblower that I talked to at the time, and Everett Stern was his name, and he said, yeah. They said, well, we'll hire people specifically to police this, and we'll look for specific terms. And what they did was it put spaces and periods inside the search terms so
they wouldn't find a match. They hired people like him who had absolutely no investigatory experience, paid them a tremendous amount of money, so they were not really too interested in bucking the system, but he was, and he exposed all that stuff. They got caught again, and rather than getting something more severe, they got something that was just as light and kept them going. But let's not talk about the bank's roll in all this. Let's not talk
about the CIA's role and all this. It is a big problem. The drug war itself is a big problem. And these drug cartels that have been created by the drug war, just like al Capone and so much organized crime was created by alcohol prohibition. This drug prohibition program it's been running for fifty years has had absolutely made absolutely no difference in drug consumption because drug abuse is a spiritual problem, not a political problem, not a cultural problem. It's
not a law enforcement problem. It is a spiritual problem. And all the law enforcement agents and all the politicians can't put humpty dumpty back together again, can I? And So the other thing that we see that is characteristic of prohibition we saw with alcohol prohibition is that the form of whatever it is that you are trying to prohibit, whether it is drugs or whether it's alcohol, becomes far more dangerous and concentrated. Have a corruption of court systems, of
law enforcement, of politicians. All of these things happen. But what it doesn't do is it doesn't stop the thing that they're trying to stop. The Cinloa cartels one of Mexico's oldest criminal organizations, one of the most violent and prolific poly drug trafficking cartels in the world. And yet when California legalized and state started legalizing marijuana, it sent a shock through these drug cartels. Well
they start moving more into human trafficking or kidnapping or whatever else. So the problem is, once you create these organized crime cartels, they don't go away even if you take away the original stuff that brought them into existence. And so now with all this crime that is happening and they've got essentially a failed narco state in Mexico, they are executing politicians who are not in their pocket and all the rest of the stuff they're coming across the border. They're moving
into local drug distribution. So guess what, you know, they're going to start killing local law enforcement, local elected officials, local people as they start to move into our country, and there's nothing being done about it. They have taken down all the barriers, and now what they want to do is disarm us as well. And it's the corrupt Mexican government that is cooperating with the corrupt American government to try to disarm American citizens. And amicus brief has
been filed against Mexico's effort to eliminate America's gun industry. They are coming after American gun manufacturers, claiming that we are that American gun manufacturers and America are respondingncible for the drug cartel, violence and all the rest of this stuff. And they're right, because it's our war on drugs that created all this stuff. But It's not the gun manufacturers that are the problems. It's a CIA, it's the Republicans. It's the Democrats who've been running this insane thing for
the longest time. Never bothered to ever pass a constitutional amendment like they did with alcohol prohibition, the Eighteenth Amendment. Never bothered with that. They don't care what the Constitution says, then get away with it. And now they want to turn the USA into a failed narco state like Mexico. Part of that means that you disarmed the population. We've had situations in Mexico where you had a local political activists come together and start to arm the local citizens to
defend against these cartels. And it wasn't the drug cartel people that took him out. It was the Mexican government itself that came in and arrested them and disarmed them because that is controlled by these cartels. They would not allow self defense. Reminded me very much, and I said at the time, reminded
me of the Magnificent Seven. You know, you had these Mexican people coming together to arm themselves, and I think the guy who was running had actually he actually came into America and he bought guns to to help them to arm themselves. But you know, just like in the Magnificent Seven, you have these Mexican villagers who are being put upon by the organized criminals of the day,
the band the bandit gangs, and then also by the federalies. So they are being you know, shot at, kicked, kicked around, robbed, policed, beaten by both the federal government in Mexico as well as these private you know they call them cartels now, they didn't call it a cartel then. And so you know, they come to America, they want the Magnificent Seven, they get some gun slingers, and they don't want the unslingers
just to take on the Mexican bandits by themselves, the big gangs. They said, teach us how to fight, you know, show us how to shoot. And so the whole town was there shooting. They had the you know, the Seven Gunfighters that were there, the American gun fighters that were training based on Seven Samurai by Kirasawa, who was a Japanese film, but a great American adaptation of it, and an example of what is really needed
and what they will not allow. Just recently was we saw you know, maybe about five six years ago the Second Amendment Foundation filed to the amicus brief with the Supreme Court on Friday. In the long running war by Mexico against America's gun makers. They want to shut them down and bankrupt them, just like the Democrats do, saying when you make guns, you're killing people. Do they do that with Tesla and their self driving cars? They do that
with ordinary cars. And of course we've seen Ford Bronco used to run people down and the Christmas parade in Wakesaw. No, no, no, this is unique. And actually they knew this was coming. They knew this was going to be a strategy. They passed a law that prohibits this. And guess what. The Democrats don't care. The courts don't care. They're just going to ignore that law that was there because they ignore the Constitution, right,
why wouldn't they ignore a newer law by Congress. An earlier brief that was filed by twenty States attorneys general focused on the protection provided by Congress when it passed the Protection of Lawful Commerce and Arms Act the PLCAA in two thousand and five to stop all this. The present brief focuses on the real intentions of Mexico working with anti gun states and politicians. What they really want to
do is the destruction through legal fees of the entire gun industry altogether. We're just talking over the weekend about how expensive ammunition has become, two to three times the price. I mean, even if you try to go back and do some kind of a workaround and with a super glue thing, you know, and get a primer, you know, it's that's even more than a real around used to cost. You know, it's amazing. But now they
want to make the guns illegal as well. And you know what is really underscoring all of this, This is a UN agenda, the UN Arms Trade Treaty, and that was something that we were working on as a family, were doing videos back in twenty twelve. The UN was trying to push it through. It was after Fast and Furious had blown up. It had a federal agent get killed. But they'd been running these guns across the border as a false flag incident. Going back to George W. Bush, he called
it the gun walker program. Obama administration called it Fast and Furious. But it was the same people doing it, and it was the same thing, and it was the same purpose. The arm trades treaty says we're going to stop the transfer and trafficking of small arms, pistols, rifles, things like that, and so in order to do that, we have to track and
trace and tag and identify each and every firearm and even ammunition. That's what's behind all this, All the stuff that they're doing with the Gunwalker program and Fast and Furious and all of that is because they want to do complete gun control and surveillance in the United States. And that's what this whole stink from Mexico is really about. It's really about the UN Arms Trade Treaty twelve years ago. As they were bringing that around, this Fast and Furious thing had
caused so much damage to them that they needed to pull it back. Interestingly, just one week before the vote in New York for the UN Arms Trade Treaty, they had the Aurora, Colorado shooting, one of the most obvious psyop shootings I've ever seen in my life, just one week before the UN Arms Tree Treaty. To try to recapture of the narrative and to try to
undo the damage that have been done with their Fast and Furious program. The original lawsuit against Smith and Wesson, it was filed in twenty twenty one, targeted key American gun makers including Barrett Bretta, Glock Storm, Ruger, Sentry International Arms, and Colts Manufacturing Company. They want to go after all of them, all of them. The lawsuit claim that they quote, design, market, distribute, and sell guns in ways that they know routinely armed the
drug cartels and Mexico. Look, if you got a problem with Americans and your failed narco state, come after the CIA, Come after the DEA, Come after the Republican and Democrat politicians who created and run and this this war on drugs. That's what created the war on drugs created your failed narco state. Not pistols. You had pistols and rifles a long time before you had a narco state. The narco state is a creature of the government run,
the intelligence communities, war on drugs. That's what it's a fixture of. Uh So, the liberal First Circuit Court in Boston, I guess they get to pick where they wanted. If it's a Mexican government, right, why would you, if you know, why wouldn't you have something that's geographically closer to Mexico. Well, they go all the way up to Boston nine of the eleven current judges there were appointed by either Clinton, Obama, or Biden.
So that liberal circuit court, the first one in Boston, reversed the lower court's decision in January. Because the lower court tossed it out and the First Circuit Court of Appeals brings it back in. We got to get rid of judicial supremacy. These judges in the first Circuit Court are not above the Constitution, they're not above Congress, they're not above state laws. As I've said for the longest time. Eventually they came around to what I always said
should have been done with Roe v. Wade. Throw it out, ignore it. It's a violation of the Tenth Amendment. Any powers not expressly given to the federal government are reserved by the states and by the people. And there was nothing in the Constitution that gave the Supreme Court authority to determine anything about abortion, or to prosecute murder, or to define what marriage is,
and all these other things that they've gotten into. And so finally, with the Dobb's decision, they said, well, yes, tenth Amendment says it belongs to the state. If the Texas governor would have said that after Rovi Wade. We could to save maybe sixty three babies from being killed anyway, So they reversed the first second court reversed it, even though they admitted that the PLCAA. Let me just tell you what that means again, that's the
Protection of Lawful Commerce and Arms Act. They said, the plc double A protected the industry from such frivolous lawsuits. Quote. Plcaa's limitations on the types of lawsuits that may be maintained in the United States applies to lawsuits initiated by foreign governments like Mexico and for harm suffered outside of the United States. And as the New American points out, that should have ended it right there.
That ended it for the lower court. But no. They then go on to say, we, however, reversed the district courts, holding that the PLCAA bars Mexico's common law claims. We remand in other words, they returned the lower to the lower court for further proceedings. And how do they do that, Well, they claim that the defendants quote aided and abetted that the defendants, all these gun companies, right, you know, Smith and Wesson, Remington, Ruger, Glock, all of them aided and abetted the knowingly
unlawful downstream trafficking of their guns in New Mexico. Well, it's an absolute line. We know exactly what they're after and what they've been doing. Republicans and Democrats did gun Walker and fast and furious, and they did it. You had Bush and you had Obama operating in the service of the United Nations to disarm Americans. That's what this is about. It's about the UNI Party
wanting to disarm Americans now being joined by a failed narco state Mexico. The disarm Americans American gunman factors, and not to blame for the increased violence in Mexico, reports The New American Well, of course we know that it is the drug war. But even beyond that, they said, the president there declared war on the cartels. Days after as inauguration in December of two thousand and six, he deployed thirty thousand Mexican troops across the country to end the
drug trade. Well, that's almost as much as Steve Chenny claimed was happening with post Lige. He said, We've got twenty thousand National Guard troops across the country. I said, this is ridiculous. You can't do that and people wouldn't know it. Come on, you know, not to mention all this stuff about blockchain, watermark ballots and everything. That's what got me fired
was opposing those lies from Steve Ritennant. Just amazing that the people would believe that, and even more amazing that Alex would be such a ballface, ball faced liar. Anyway, the cartels responded with the counter offensive against American soldiers. Color's late two thousand and six declaration of war on the Cartels reversed the declining homicide trend in Mexico. In other words, here's the deal, right, They've got a declining homicide rate. But then they turned the drug war
into an actual war. Caldern calls up the military and they got thirty thousand troops out there fighting them, and they're shooting back and forth. And now you got the homicide rate goes up. We got cases here, we got cases a gunshot death. Now we're gonna have to ban your gun, lock it down, We're gonna have to shut down the companies that make the guns. How about addressing the drug side of all this stuff, and this failed notion of a drug war that we can end all this stuff by force.
It's just the dumbest thing I've ever seen in my life, with all kinds of bad consequences. The drug war is again. I don't support any drug use. I don't use any drugs. I've never wanted to. You know, I had plenty of opportunity to in college and bands and all that. Everybody else is using the stuff. I didn't want to use it. And it said that to my friends and engineering, and I said, well, you and I never using this. Well, it's probably because they all thought
you were a narc So yeah, probably did. But under cover band in Narchics. They from two thousand and seven to two thousand and eight, homicides related to the drug war more than doubled. Mexico's total homicide rate rose fifty seven percent. Is it because of Smith and Wesson? No, it was because Carlon decided that he was going to go to literal war against the cartels. The increase continued for years, with drug war homicides increasing by another forty
one percent between two thousand and eight and two thousand and nine. I noticed I was talking about this, that's the UN Arms Trade treaty. Oh yeah, we're going to stop all the arms, traffic and everything, and we're gonna no, that wasn't never the problem. Gun violence in Mexico decreased in the three years after the US assault weapons ban expired, and it didn't increase
¶ "Framed" by AI Biometrics, Banned from Stores as "Thief"
until the Mexican government began its war with the cartels. So we know exactly what is going on here. So as they're rolling all this stuff out, as we talk about artificial intelligence, I'll get to the the civil asset forfeiture thing here next, but I just want to say, you know, last week, as I talked about Visa and the fact that going all biometric, one card to rule them all, and you know, we don't want you havy to remember passwords, and passwords can be faked or stolen or whatever.
We're going to recognize you by your face. You're going to pay with a smile or maybe a frown. I guess you pay with a smile. And then when the bill comes is when the frown is, I guess you realize how much you've bet on your credit card. And last month, and as a woman branded a shoplifter by facial recognition software, yeah, biometric software and AI BBC says Sarah needed some chocolate she'd had one of those days, so
she wandered into a home bargains store. Well, then less than a minute, I'm approached by a store worker who comes up to me and says, you're a thief. You need to leave the store. Sarah, who wants to remain anonymous, was wrongly accused after being flagged by a facial recognition system called face Watch. Well, face Watch put your stuff in Facebook? Do you think maybe they're going through Facebook and looking at your pictures and creating a
biometric database? Now, Oh, the government would never do anything like that, would they. And there's laws against stuff like that, right, they would never do any of that stuff like Facebook, she says. After her bag was searched, she was let out of the shop and told that she was banned from all stores using the technology. I was just crying and crying the entire journey home. I thought, will my life be the same.
I'm going to be looked at as a shoplifter when I've never stolen. So, she later Kane she went into a fight with this face watch thing, and they eventually acknowledged that they had made an error. Well, good luck, I imagine it's probably going to happen to her again. You see, we have we keep getting these bills from the Texas tolls even though we haven't
lived there for two years. Just got another one, And you spend a tremendous amount of care and spends a tremendous amount of time on the phone trying to get through to these people run by a private organization that the state has turned this over to. And they'll go through and say, look, no I'm not I wasn't there, prove it. I want to see the picture. Okay, well we'll check on this. I don't want to see the picture now, so you know, to come back after a while. Never
mind, we looked at it's wrong. They've got license plate readers, they have face pictures that they take and all the rest of this stuff. And they keep writing us this because they figure that, you know, you'll just go ahead and pay because it's just a couple of dollars and you don't want to spend a half hour on the phone with some little uh, you know, some person from India or something to try to work this thing out. So I figure to just pay because if you don't, they keep escalating the
fines and it gets really big. And I don't think they've got any way to collect on it outside of Texas, but I don't want to. We don't want to find out. And that's one of the one of the good things about Tennessee. Tennessee was one of only fourteen states that didn't have tolls. These tolls are typically run by foreign countries. You want to talk about a public private partnership, you want to talk about corporatism and fascism and all
the rest of this stuff. It's embodied in all of that. But unfortunately, we got a Republican governor, Bill Lee, who decided that he liked toll roads. He probably likes the money that's going to be given to him by some of these foreign corporations. He called him choice lanes. Choice lanes. Yeah, you can choose not to go on them, or you know, maybe I could choose not to vote for you, Bill Lee. Anyway, it's just not retailers who are turning to the technology. Cameras are attached
to rooftops. They capture thousands of images of people's faces. They've matched people that are on a police watch list, or if they think they've got to match. You know, we're talking about AI here. Officers would speak to them and potentially arrest them. And this is what this is really about.
You know, when you look at the amount of money, this amount, the amount of data that's being collected on each and every one of us, they don't have enough people to go through and mine and corelate all this data. That's what they need, artificial intelligence for civil liberties groups. However, we're worried about the accuracy. Well, given the tautulitarian direction of all of our governments, I'm worried about the accuracy. Having accuracy may not be a
good thing because they don't have good motivations. Well, this was sent to me by Natasha California is cannabis cash grabs on the daily Mail. This is one of the most outrageous civil asset forfeiture stories I've seen. And I've been covering this for a long time, but that was kind of one of my first exposures to the failure of the war on drugs and how criminal our government had become in terms of its application. We look at civil asset forfeiture.
Of the first cases, remember, there was a guy Donald I think his name was Donald Scott. He was in California. They wanted his land. He didn't want to sell the land. He fought them. He had a lot of money, and he fought them on the eminent domain stuff and everything. So what he did was they thought, well, just get it on the cheap. We're just confiscated. We don't have to pay him, we don't have to do this court stuff. So they did a flyover and they
found in this rural area. They said, well, there's some marijuana growing there. I don't know if it's growing naturally or somebody was using that, you know, acreage that he wasn't paying attention to, if they were actually growing up. So they did a drug raid, one of these no knock drug raids, and just kicking the door and the light, he thought there were house invasion. He comes down the stairs with a gun in his hand. They shot him dead and then they took the lamb. Another one was
a guy who, and I've mentioned this before, had private planes. He had a charter service, essentially running a taxi service. As two guys in suits show up with out of shay cases or attached a cases, and he flew them from the US to Canada for a business meeting. He waited for them. They came out of their business meeting. He flew them back. When he comes back to the United States and Lands, they've got DEA agents surrounding his plane, guns pointed. They arrest these two guys and they say,
well, we're taking your plane. He goes, I didn't know anything about this. They go, yeah, we know you didn't know anything about it, but your plane is involved in the crime. We're charging your plane crime US government versus lar Jet serial number, blah blah blah. If you want to do something about it, you can sue us in court civil suit. There's no presumption of innocence. You'll have to prove that you were innocent
and you'll have to sue us. And he did. He got his plane back after two or three years, but he was bankrupt by then because that was his only plane in his business. So none of these property owners were growing cannabis. There's no accusation that they were. Here's a story from Daily Mail. Retired couple Korean and Doug Thomas thought that they had found there forever home when they bought a rustic property that was nestled in the middle of a
redwood forest in Humboldt County, California. It put an end to their three year stent of living in a motor home forced on them after their previous home in La was destroyed by the Wolsey Fire of twenty eighteen. Instead, they had simply opened the next chapter in an ongoing nightmare. Submitted for your approval.
You are in the government zone. Less a week after moving in, Coreem seventy and Doug seventy four, who are both disabled and on fixed incomes, were slapped with fines that eventually grew to more than a million dollars because the previous owners had used the property for illegal cannabis growth. Says the county,
they don't have to prove that. Astonishingly, they're among dozens of unwinning homeowners have been targeted by Humboldt County, whose officials have been accused in a class action lawsuit of trying to squeeze every dollar it can out of legalized marijuana at the expense of innocent people, and so they're facing fines of more than a million dollars. Another person, Ronda Olsen, that they feature in here sixty four, has been hit with a fine of more than seven million dollars
because of an illegal cannabis growth operated by the previous owners. You look at these people, their houses are not expensive houses. They're elderly, they don't have any money. Bill Blue Graham fifty one finds around nine hundred thousand after humbold County accused him of using a greenhouse to grow cannabis without a permit, he was actually using it to grow vegetables for his restaurant. I mean for years, the EA would hang outside of stores for people to go, would
go and buy things to grow greenhouse vegetables or something like that. You might not even have gotten a grow light, but they would hang around. They would watch the people who come in, and they would follow them home. Then they would go through their trash cans outside and all the rest of this stuff and try to surveil them or raid them or something. Oh, you
got to be growing cannabis secretly. Similarly, a chicken farmer was prosecuted by the county for growing cannabis in a greenhouse, which he was in fact rearing chickens. The extraordinary claims are laid bare in a lawsuit that's been filed by the Institute for Justice. And yet we focus on the presidential race, don't we? Oh Gee, I hope that Trump gets in instead of Biden or vice versa. Yeah, right, that'll help a lot with this stuff on
it. No, it's obvious that we aren't involved with cannabis, Doug said. We don't even drink alcohol. We're just old senior citizens. The county knows it, but they're still coming after us. They are at war with the community. That's why I begin this. The government is at war with you. Your own government is that they want to take your car. They want to take your they want to take your gas range, your gas heater.
They want to shut down the power grid. They want to take your meat, they want to take your milk, they want to take your life. They are at war with you. The county position is that the current occupants are somehow responsible for any past violations of their property, because you see, they take a very interesting view of property crime property crime. We look at property crime we think, well, property crime is when somebody destroys my
property or steals my property or something like that. No, these people who are running the war on drugs think of property crime as crime committed by property. They charge the plane, or they charge the home, or they charge the stack of cash with a crime and you have to ask yourself, one of these dea agents and law enforcement agents smoking, you come up with something that is an indictment against an inanimate object, what are you smoking? Well,
I think they're drunk on power. I think they're drunk and corrupt on power. I think they'll do anything for money. Or have we seen that before in the last four years the corruption that is so rampant in our country? Do we care about this kind of you know, where's this coming? As I said before, you know, the politics and the corruption, all this stuff is downstream from the politics, downstream from the culture, downstream from
the spiritual war. If you remove the spiritual foundations, if you remove the idea the people are accountable to God. You know, even people like Richard Dawkins, as I showed on Friday, understand that. You know, they understand that. They like all the you know, they'd like to live in a society where people know they're going to be held accountable to God. But they don't want that. You know, we want the apples, but we don't want the orchard. Right, shut that cut that down. Richard Dawkins
now sees it. He didn't see it fifteen years ago when Christopher Hitchens was starting to see it before he died. Anyway, going back to these people, he and his wife, who run a nonprofit called Miracle Run Foundation for Autism, used insurance money for the twenty eighteen fire that took their home at that point in time in LA. They used that insurance money to buy their new home and Humboldt, which sits on top of a ridge above the avenue
of the Giants. Behind their home, there's a detached garage alongside a three story building that the listing refers to as a workshop. Matter of fact, we've been out there and it's just a beautiful area. It's just amazing, those redwoods and all of the rest, truly is amazing. But you know, the bureaucrats want it, and all this stuff is bureaucratic fiction. This theft. Congress does nothing. The war on drugs is a federal thing.
Sessions a partner in crime with these local law enforcement. Pele, you steal this stuff. I don't have any authority for the drug war, he pacitly admits, I've got no authority for that. But if you steal property from people, even in California where the marijuana has been legalized, and you've got a sheriff's office in San Bernardino County held up armored cars three different times and got lots of money from him each of those, well two of those time.
Third time they're ready for him. They caught him red handed. But you know they keep doing that. They're criminals, highway robbers, and it's being incentivized by the federal government. They have no authority. They know it. Republicans know it, the Democrats know it, Sessions knows it, Garland knows it. All of these guys know they have no authority for a drug war. Instead, what they do is like organized crime. They incentivize corrupt
police departments like the sheriff's apartment at San Bernardino to steal the money. And they say, we'll take twenty percent and give you eighty percent back, and we'll give you legal cover on all this stuff. So behind the home there's a detached garage alongside a three story building that the listing referred to as a workshop. When the couple purchased the property, the workshop was empty and the electrical wiring inside had all been cut. It is a in this ramshackle barn
that the county says was used to illegally grow cannabis two years earlier. Oh, really, prove it, take it to court, charge them, take it to court. No, we're not going to do that. The Thomases were told that if they didn't demolish the building within ten days, they would face fines of twelve thousand dollars per day. But they didn't have one hundred and eighty thousand dollars they were told it would cost to destroy the barn.
They're now facing one million and eighty thousand dollars in fines that have accumulated. The couple are one of more than twelve hundred rid Humboldt property owners charged with cannabis related code violations since it was legalized for personal use in twenty eighteen. I wonder how many people live in Humboldt County. That's twelve hundred homes, and all the people that live in those homes are going to be more than one person in many of those homes. Is this how they get to the
point where we own nothing. They come around and they use you know, well, we think there was a crime committed in that home once, once upon time, So we're just going to take it. What. Oh, you didn't commit the crime. That's fine, but we're just going to take the home twelve hundred people in that one county hundreds of millions of dollars in fines. At least forty eight of these landowners have appealed their penalties, but
many more who have been unfairly targeted, have chosen to settle. They don't stand out for your rights, you Lisen. This is because the county makes accused landowners wait indefinitely for a hearing while fines continue to accumulate. The lawsuit claims the way, you know, when you look at what happened in La with John MacArthur's church. Once they started fighting the lockdown restrictions and things like
that, that really happened when they said now you can't sing. Okay, you can come and limited numbers, and you can set six feet apart, which we know there was no basis for any of that stuff, and you can wear masks, but still if you do all of that, you still can't sing. They said, we're done. Then they started hitnging with fines and the fine started accumulating and started compounding with interest and all the rest of the stuff. You know, it's over. It's like a million dollars that
they accumulated for mask fines. But you know, they hung in there and they eventually won and got the money back. But I understand how intimidating that is. Blue Graham, for instance, asked for an appeal in twenty eighteen. The county only agreed to finally schedule his hearing four and a half years later, when he was preparing to file the lawsuit. Satellite images are used to show harmless things like greenhouses on a property, which are then deemed to
be sufficient evidence to accuse a landowner of growing marijuana illegally. So you can have AI identify your face and say you're a thief, or you can have AI and satellite images looking for greenhouses and it's that you're a you know, you're growing drugs there. The entire system is designed to generate money for the county as efficiently as possible by forcing accused residents to pay the county even when
they have done nothing wrong. That's a hallmark of civil asset forfeiture. Yeah, the strategy appears to be doing very little to tackle the real illicit weed market, which has flourished even in the wake of legalization. Why is that because the taxes are so high, you know, people are still the taxes are so high on tobacco that you have a flourishing market and cigarettes that people
didn't pay the taxes to New York on. And you got people like John Bayner who is, as he said when he was Speaker of the House or Republican Speaker of the House, he said, I am unulterably opposed to marijuana. And then he gets out and he goes to work, becomes a partner and a company that was selling marijuana products, and now he can't say enough good stuff about it. And he just did a joint fundraiser with that's no
pun intended with Machiavelli and Mike Johnson and what they were smoking. If they thought that anybody's going to give them money, of course, you know, you get paid back. You got a great return on investment if you buy an interest in Machiavelli and Mike Johnson, just like with John Bayner. Legislators had hoped that the creation of a commercial market in twenty twenty one would generate five point three billion dollars in taxed sales. That's enough of an incentive for
people to set up a black market in marijuana. Even when the marijuana is legal. The taxes are so the plaintiffs in the Humboldt case. You would think that this would be a slam dunk win for people, wouldn't you. It's so unjust. Nevertheless, they had a setback in May of last year when a federal judge sided with the county and granted its motion to dismiss the lawsuit. Our individual rights aren't justice. Nothing is safe from these activist courts.
Not your kids, not your parental rights. Nothing is safe from these people. These judges are like a box of chocolates. You never know what you're going to get. Of course, sometimes you do. You know, sometimes the ingredients are there on the lid. Appointed by Obama, Biden, Bill Clinton, and you kind of know what you're going to get in the first circuit court. But they can steal everything from you. They can steal
firearms, they can steal your property under the flimsiest of excuses. Imagine a court that would side with the county and against these people on what basis That's one of the most astounding criminal things that the judge would sign on to. This too. If the Institute for Justice lodged. Rather, the Institute for Justice did lodge an appeal which has recently been heard by the Ninth District Court of Appeals. Also not a court that is sympathetic to our rights. A
decision is pending. Livelihoods rest on this outcome. We lost our home of thirty five years in the wildfires, Doug said. And if we lose this, we will lose everything. You will own nothing, and he'll be happier. Won't he be happier when they take everything from him. We're going to take a quick break. We'll be right back. Liberty, it's your move.
And now the David Knight Show. All right, welcome back. I want to talk a little bit about what happened at the LP convention with Trump and with RFK Jr. And about the futility of presidential politics, about the necessity of having more than two candidates if you're going to actually talk about any any issues, and how even third party candidates and parties have been seduced by fame and fortune in any different ways. I mean, there's a lot of
things to see here. It was pretty entertaining. I actually look at it before we do real quickly. I've got an on rumble. Joe Baker, thank you very much for the tip, says thirty four year old anchor Baby here have been listening to you since Jakari Jackson days. Thank you for all you doing for your all your family does well. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. I wonder we're just talking about Jakari yesterday. I wonder where he is. Jacari, if you're out there, send me a message.
I'd like to I like to connect up with you. Great guy. I really like Jakari, a real honest guy. And uh, yeah,
¶ Trump and RFK Speak at Libertarian Convention - Cheers & Jeers
so he didn't last Uh it's a little bit too honest about his convictions there. Anyway, let's talk about what happened with the LP. Kennedy blasts Biden, and of course it's kind of interesting to see that our our curated media, they've decided they look at the situations like, well, I'm going to be I'm going to support Biden. That's the market of the democraphics that I want. So I'm going to put stuff out there to support Biden, or
I'm going to put stuff out there to support Trump. And for the most part it's been that way. Occasionally, you see an isolated article like this one that was on Saturday from the AP Kennedy blast Biden and Trump over pandemic measures, and his pitch at the Libertarian convention accused Biden and Trump of trampling on personal liberties. Well, of course they did, and finally somebody said it. All the Republican candidates were too afraid to say it, or maybe
they didn't care. Ditto for all the Democratic candidates. They didn't care or too afraid to attack Biden on that issue. And that's why it's important to have some third party candidates out there. He said, maybe a brainworm ate that part of my memory, but I don't recall any part of the US contion where there's an exemption for pandemics. He said, neither of them,
not Biden, not Trump, upheld the Constitution when it really counted. And you know the interesting thing is they they maybe the Libertarians have learned their lesson or something. But you know, during I remember in twenty twenty, I was so disappointed that neither did the LP. Yeah, Joe Jorgensen, who was running for president with a Libertarian party. I knew Joe, and instead of pushing back against the lockdowns and the masks and all the rest of this
stuff. She was out there supporting BLM riots. What what in the world. I mean, that's as far as I'm concerned. The BLM riots were not expressions of free speech. They were not mostly peaceful protests. I did not understand why she would support that, and why the Libertarian Party in an election year would be completely silent about the most egregious violation of our Bill of Rights ever ever. And yes, she was the only Libertarian that I saw. And I tried to get him on the show, but he didn't want
to come on. I think he was afraid that he was going to get elected. It was rainwater running for governor in Indiana. I've since had him on the show, but you know, he immediately jumped up to like fifteen or twenty percent. I forget the exact number in the bath because he actively came out opposing all of these measures, and immediately he shot up like fifteen or twenty percent. People were starving for somebody to talk about this that was
in politics. I was talking about it, but they were looking for somebody that was going to run for political office somewhere that was going to oppose this medical martial law. And so he shot up and I said, come on, no, no, I don't want to I don't want to talk anymore. You know, it's like, okay, all right, I've been there. I know. You know. You run because you want to get the information out there, but you really don't want to be in government. I
understand. Kennedy talked publicly about pursuing the libertary nomination as a way to secure ballot access, which sparked a controversy and the party were some members opposed supporting a candidate who's not always in step with their limited government views, and yet their limited government views did not want to limit government in twenty twenty. In the summer of twenty twenty, eventually joej. Rgenson came around, but you
know, by then she had lost people's interest. It really was pathetic that they wouldn't be so immediately outraged to this anyway. RFK Junior's mere presidence at the convention was controversial, with some delegates attempting to bar his speech. He was not on the list of nominees from which a Libertarian presidential candidate would be will be selected on Saturday. This is written on Friday, but you know,
there's kind of a precedent for that. I remember in the nineties, I think as ninety four, the Libertarian Party convention was in Salt Lake City. I went to it, or in Hatch was there, senator from Utah, and he spoke and addressed the Libertarians, and you know, he said, look, you know, we we agree, disagree on a lot of issues, and we did. But at the time, the FDA was pushing
to ban all kinds of vitamins. I mean, they went to banned vitamin C if you had it and more than like something sixty milligrams or something, and so he was on our side on that issue. He said, you know, yeah, we can agree to disagree on all these other issues, but we can work together for this type of thing. And it was fine. You know, I had no problem with that. Again, we need
to focus on the issues, not the people, not the parties. If we can come to an agreement on something, that's what we should do. We should work for that particular cause, you know, Ron Wyden, I disagree with him on everything except for his pushback against this dragnet surveillance being done by the NSA and the CIA, listening to mister and missus Verizon and that type of stuff. He's been very good on that and very consistent on that, always opposing it. He was one that made Clapper commit, Well,
he didn't make him commit. Clapper decided that he didn't want to answer truthfully, so he committed perjury. But nobody ever charged him with it. Nobody, you know, not Mike Lee, not not Rand Paul, nobody. Anyway, I guess you don't want to get on the bed side of the ce CIA people, as Schumer said, they got so many ways that they
can get at you, don't they. Kennedy acknowledged his differences with libertarians, but he focused his pitch on the view that Trump and Biden administrators overstepped during the pandemic. Trump, he said, was wrong to close businesses and shield companies from my ability and developing products to respond to the pandemic, and Biden
violated America's fundamental freedoms with his support for vaccine mandates. Kennedy said the mandates, which aimed to require inoculations for as many as one hundred million workers, were partially blocked in the courts and in Congress, and most of the rest ended in twenty twenty three with a Biden administration touting them as tremendously beneficial. No, even if they had worked, which they didn't. Kennedy also took
aim at social media companies. He said, who bowed to government pressure to block dissenting views on the origins of COVID nineteen and the safety of vaccines. And yet Kennedy wanted to jail people that disagreed with him on climate change. He never publicly repented of that. Instead, what he did was he doubled down on a lie. I wasn't talking about the Koch brothers. I was talking about their companies. No, you said to put them in jail, He said, to give them three hots and a cot. You don't do
that to companies. You would. You could give, as he pointed out, you could give a corporate corporation a corporate death penalty. But that's not putting him in jail. Democrats and Republican administrators have administrations have taken turns assaulting
our constitutional rights and freedoms. And see that's right. Like I said, I wouldn't vote for Kennedy because he's been dishonest about his position on free speech, and because I disagree with him about his manic and idiotic obsession with climate change. However, if we had him in a debate, he would say this kind of stuff, and he was one hundred percent right about both Trump and Biden about closing businesses, shielding companies from liability, putting out mandates,
and all the rest of the stuff. It was absolutely criminal what Trump and Biden did. RFK Junior repeated his pledge to pardon Wikileak's founder Juliana Sane, who is fighting extradition from the UK on US spionage charges. By the way, Trump did not repeat that Trump was pushed to free Ross Olbrich, which
I would love to see. I've interviewed Ross's mother many times, when sweet mother just her heart's been broken by her young son who has been given no possibility of ever getting out on parole because he ran a website, because they needed to make an example of people using cryptocurrency and running websites in the dark Web. There was nothing any more dark about that part of the web than there is the rest of the web. Right now, you can get kitty
porn or anything else that you want on the actual web. The thing about the dark Web is not darker and more evil than the other web. It's just that it was harder for the government to see it. It was dark to them, hidden from them. A better way to describe it would be the hidden web, hidden from the government. They had to make an example out of Ross Elbrick, and it's absolutely shameful what they did. The way that this judge who sentenced him came up with excuse for having consecutive life terms
and then plus forty years to make sure he could never get parole. The lying justification that she had was a murder for higher situation, and there was no murder for a higher situation according to Lynn and according to Ross. And this and the simple fact that to show you I believe them, I don't believe the judge because when the judge brought that in Ross had not been convicted of that crime. He had not even been charged by a grand jury.
You had these allegations were made by our corrupt FBI, and they had a prosecutor who public who held press conferences and made these allegations. But he never indicted Ross and never tried him, and he wasn't found guilty because he never had a trial. Wasn't even a dieted And of course you can diet anybody with a grand jury, right indict a ham Sandwich because there's no opposition to
it. He decided not to do that, but the judge gave him this enhanced sentencing and justified it based on the fact that he had done murder fer harm, which he was never even indicted for, let alone found guilty.
Vaccines have been proven to be safe and effective, says the AP. So they talk about the fact that RFK Junior criticized their vaccine policy, their lockdown policy, their medical martial law, and listen, this is a reminder from Associated Press that they are associated propaganda, that they are bought and sold liars of big pharmaceutical companies, and the government agenda listened to these two paragraphs that they have to put in at the end of the article after they unfortunately have
to report what r f K Junior said about these killer shots. Vaccines have been proven to be safe and effective in lab testing and in real world use and hundreds of millions of people over the decades. For decades, the World Health Organization credits childhood vaccines with preventing as much as five million deaths a year. Well, we have these vaccine adverse event reporting systems, but of course
the COVID vaccine is in another category all by itself, isn't it? And they say the COVID nineteen vaccine has also been found to be safe and effective in testing and in real world usage. While no medical intervention is risk free, doctors and researchers have proven that risks from disease are generally far greater than the risks from vaccines. I mentioned that to you because Jonathan J. Cooper, you are a shame. You are a shill and a shame on your
profession. You have absolutely no integrity. You are a boot licking sycophant to this stalitarian government. Writing for the Associated Press. Disgusting and it shows you just how bad these people are. But of course we know you know they want to set the terms for everything. Say you don't have anybody you will not do an article and have it refer to people as pro life. No,
they are anti abortion rights. Everything they do is politicized propaganda. The Associated Press, the New York Sun talking about Trump as he appeared at the Libertarian Party and independent presidential CANDIDATEA. RFK Junior used to speech at the Libertarian Party to attack Trump, and he shot an arrow in mister Trump's achilles heel. What is his achilles heel? Oh yeah, well it's the vaccine, it's the lockdown, it's the masks, it's all this stuff. Look at
this picture Operation Warp Speed. There in the background, you got pens and all these other people there wearing masks, looking very severe. There's Robert Redfield, I recognize his lying eyes. And there's Trump, not wearing a mask, but signing all of this stuff away, you know, money to do the pandemic. Kennedy said that Trump had the right instincts when he came into office, but he was steamrolled by the swamp of bureaucrats that he had promised
to drain. Isn't that amazing? Again, you know, just like other people will cover for Trump. Rf K Junior is trying to get votes. No, Trump boasted for three years after leaving, He boasted of all this stuff. He wasn't he didn't have the right instincts. Instincts, Yeah, he had. What Trump had is something more like basic instincts of the of the Sharon stone kind. That's the only kind of instincts that Trump. He doesn't have the right instincts. He doesn't have the right stuff. He's got
basic instincts that's he wasn't doing anything. He wasn't fooled, and if he's that big a fool that he would not only be fooled during that time when all the rest of us knew it. See, this is the thing that bothers me, all these people, rf K Junior says, But of course all of the MAGA people that he's appealing to say it. I just want to see these people. You knew it then, you know it, now
you know it. That he continued to push all this stuff. Why is it if he is that much dumber than you are, why would you ever vote for him for president? I mean, come on, this guy pushed it for three years afterwards, even with the lockdowns, the mask mandates, of travel restrictions, President Trump presided over the greatest restriction on individual liberties this country has ever known, said RFK Junior. Truer words never been spoken.
And of course Joe Jorgenson the LP didn't care about it. In twenty twenty when they were running I guess you know it was. It was Goldwater's speech writer, who Carl hess is one of the founders of the Libertarian Party. Goldwater referred to him as his Shakespeare. He was a guy whose mother had homeschooled him in the nineteen thirties kept on the move to keep one step ahead
of the truancy officer because it was illegal. And the guy that she homeschooled, Karl has became speech writer for Barry Goldwater, and he was one who wrote, extremism in defense of liberty is no virtue, and he said moderation in moderation in pursuit of justice. I'm sorry, extremism is no vice. Right, Extremism in pursuit of individual liberty is no vice, and moderation in defense of justice is no virtue. I don't know. I guess these people
for them. You know what we've seen in twenty twenty is extremism in defense of public health is a virtue. Right, It's a virtue we all have to always wonder. I'm glad that that happened. I'm glad that we asked everybody. Forget about the fact that master don't work. Forget about the fact that, you know, people are going to be laughing at you for eternity. You know. I just want to go on the record that I had absolutely nothing to do with any of this stuff. I posed it from the
beginning, and I want future generations to not laugh at me. I was not a part of any of this at any point time, and most of you were not either, I know, but of course you know it's no vice to defend public health, that all measures and of course mandates are a virtue. That's what these people act. That's how they act. That's really what both Trump and Biden are telling you. They're telling you that extremism in defense of public health is no vice, and that mandates are a virtue.
Kennedy is mounting the most formidable third party challenge since Ross Puro, pulling on an average of twelve percent, says The New York Sun. And he knows how to appeal libertarian audiences because he promised again to free Julian Assange. He says, Assigne should be celebrat as a hero, and you got a standing ovation for that, along with chance of free Assange. And then in terms of the reaction to it, you know, this is what I thought was
amazing, the reactions. I'll play some of the reactions here in a moment, but one person say, well, it obviously raises a profile a libertarian party. Would you be here if he wasn't here, they said to the reporter, and guy says, well, I think we have the opportunity to show people how cool we are. Is that what this is about, because
that's funny. I mean, you know, when you go to these political conventions, and it doesn't really matter whether you're whether you're going to a libertarian convention or Republican convention and democratic convention, there's always going to be somebody who just dresses like a clown, or, in the case of the Libertarian Party convention, doesn't dress at all. I had a picture of a guy sitting
in the front row. But if the alt media, alt right media would report this, what they showed was this one picture of some guy who looked like he was not wearing anything other than a ridiculous hat and a frown, sitting in the front row, and he had people on the side of him that were in suit and thie or ordinary dress or whatever. But they focus on that particular guy and they always will, you know that, And it's one of the things I don't like about these things anyway. But when Trump
comes on, he doesn't talk about Julian songe isn't that interesting? He does not promise to free Julia Songe. She promised to free ross Albrick, and I'm glad that he did, and I hope that he would. But as I pointed out on Twitter, I said, well, you know, he was there for what fourteen hundred and sixty days and he didn't free ross And there was a big movement at the end, a lot of letter writing campaign people asking him to free rossp Instead, he freed the Israeli pals, the
white collar criminals, the spies of Jared Kushner and family. That's who he freed, people who would pay him. You know, here's oh, I hear that Rudy Giuliani is doing pardons, and so he meets with Rudy Giuliani and two of his thug henchmen and the pardon he says, So what about this pardon thing? Oh I got to go to the bathroom, says Rudy. He gets up and goes, and the other two guys said to him, it'll cost you a million dollars. They're selling part and pardons. Come
on, Trump could have pardoned a Signs. He could have pardoned ross Albrick. He could have pardoned Marty Gottisveld, He could have pardoned Shaeffer Cox, a lot of political prisoners that we have to centers that could have been pardoned by Trump, but he focused on some of the biggest white collar criminals and spies because they were friends of Jared And so then they said, not even a promise to free Silk Road founder ross Albrick is enough to shield Trump from
the jeers of libertarians. Here he is at the convention. I thought it was interesting that the Drudge Report gave so much press to this and when that was happening. This is at the top of the Drudge Report they show that's just described this that people are listening on audio. The LP has this big backdrop that looks like handwritten graffiti says ungovernable. Trump is standing there, but then there's a silhouette in the front of this particular picture, silhouette of somebody
holding their arm up thumbs down. So it's like a silhouette superimposed on Trump and the ungovernable thing, and it says bood heckled at Libertarian convention that don loses control the video that MAGA doesn't want you to see. And so I started looking around to see, well, is that being put up by Brightbard or info Wars, and no, none of them wanted to put that up. Yeah, they didn't want you to see that. So anyway, he got booze and chants of liar, which I don't know. I left the
Libertarian Party a long time ago. We had a lot of different agreements, but I certainly would be their chanting that if I was there. Trump and dirt, booze and chants of liar and banderer As he made his pitch to a packed hotel ballroom composed of Libertarian convention goers and of MAGA fans, he brought some of his own people there, many of them donning the MAGA red
caps, who traveled only to hear the former president speak free. Ross Olbrick topped the list of issues that the LP said they hoped mister Trump would address in his speech to the convention. He said, and here's what he had to say about Ross. Can you vote for me on day one? I
will commute the sentence of Ross Albrick. Yeah, all right, So yeah, again, do you believe that he's going to have such a busy day, because you know, I don't know what he was doing for fourteen hundred and sixty odd days four years in office just kind of kick him back and tweeting or whatever. For fourteen hundred and sixty he had all these really important things to do. He just never got around to doing them. In four years. He needed to shut down the Paris climbing a court and all the
rest. He just couldn't be bothered. But you know, in day one he's gonna get all that stuff done kind of reminds me of the people say, well, you know, I'm going to go on a diet tomorrow. It just never happens, does it. So yeah, you vote for me on day one, I will commute the Senates of ross Albrick. We'll get him home, Yes, says the person recording that. Well again, I
hope he does. And, as The New York Sun says, for a candidate who once praised Filipino President Rodrigo du Terte for doing an unbelievable job and executing drug dealers, mister Trump's promise to free ross Albrick as a serious olive branch to libertarian voters. He also promised to put a libertarian in his cabinet. Yeah, that's right, I'm gonna get a libertarian in the cabinet. Tiger in your tank and all the rest of this stuff. Look, he
just he also promised that he'll put Nicky Haley on his team. Now that I believe. I don't believe he's going to put a libertarian in the cabinet, And I don't believe that he's going to pardon rosss Ulbrick, but I do believe that he's going to have Nicki Haley and a bunch of other neo kons like that. Do you think he's going to have anybody in his cabinet that isn't part of the CIA, or the military industrial complex or the big
pharmaceutical companies are on and on the big banks. Do you think he's going to have anybody in there other than that. That's what he filled his cabinet with the first time. No wonder he didn't drain the swamp, right, he built it extended the swamp. So yeah, instead of all that, he's going to put in a libertarian in and you can believe all of that. I'm sure in the past year he said, I've been indicted by the government on ninety one different things. So if I wasn't a libertarian before,
I sure as hell am a libertarian. Now, said Trump. The question is, though, right a libertarian, what does a libertarian want? Libertarian wants due process and the rule of law, the respects individual liberty. What does Trump want? Revenge? Revenge? His people want revenge. They don't want due process, they don't want to build rights, they don't want individual
liberty, They want revenge. That's the problem. Many probably do not forget some of Trump's policies during COVID, whether it's vaccine related or lockdown related, and they may not be ready to forgive and forget, said a Republican strategist Matthew Bartlett. Never forgive, never forget what he did. And I say that because Trump has said many times Sames, he doesn't need God's forgiveness, Well, then he doesn't need yours as well. And he hasn't asked for
God's forgiveness, and he hasn't asked for your forgiveness. And you need to understand this guy is a mass murderer and he will do it again when he gets the chance, and so will Biden. Two of a kind, Two of a kind, Never forget or forgive twenty twenty or twenty twenty one, or twenty twenty two or twenty twenty three or twenty twenty four, be foolish
to do that. Libertarian Party chairwoman had advised her party ahead of time to keep the room civil since libertarians, he said, believe in free speech. This is the Libertarian National Convention. It's not Ben Shapiro at Berkeley. We are not Antifa. But one person from Montana, Melissa wang Wong, was right about one thing. These are Libertarians and they're going to boo. They boo their own people. That's right. We do, don't we. I
don't support people. I support policies, and if you're going to be in politics, better get a thick skin because I'm throw anything I can at you if you do, if you violate the Bill of Rights and individual liberty, I'm not going to hold anything back. So yeah, I was booing the LP in twenty twenty because they weren't standing for liberty. No, yeah, wear the mask or whatever. As a matter of fact, this guy, this clown that they put in, he was telling everybody put the mask on
as well. He's no better than Joe Jorgenson. And you know, I hate to say that, but you know it's a public figure. I know, like I said, I've known Joe Jorgenson. He's very nice personally, but I absolutely disagree with her on policy. I'm not a Trump fan. I want Trump in jail for pushing the COVID regime and Operation warp Speed, said Libertarian presidential candidate Josh Smith, who did make it. But we have more media and press eyes on us than we've ever had in our fifty years
of existence because of all this. Oh, okay, so it's worth it. It's worth it to give this guy a platform in this particular case, as long as the people will call him a liar and a pandur, I think it's okay. It would have been better if they would have put him in one of those cages where if you hit the target, he goes in the water, you know, get the dump dump things. Now, that would have been something to say. I would have liked that. I'm surprised
Trump didn't think of that. It would have got him even more coverage, could have played the victim with all that. Anyway, we got a major political party candidate to say that he would free ross all break well, did you realize that? And that's a libertarian presidential candidate who also didn't make it. Michael Rechtenwald. Do you realize that major political party candidates will say anything and it's totally meaningless. Were you born yesterday? I mean, I don't
say anything. We could get a lot of attention by burning the hotel down, too, said one person. And that would gain us a lot of attention, but not good attention, said the chairman of the party's classical liberal caucus, Jonathan Casey. Libertarian presidential candidate Chase Oliver, who was the one who made it, said Trump's speaking engagement at media coverage would cause brand confusion to unsavvy voters. He also said he didn't believe that Trump would follow through
any of the promises. Well, there you go. At least he's got that kind of sense there. But I think that Chase Oliver himself is going to cause a lot of brand confusion about what libertarian really is. You know, we had a lot of people will use you know, why do you run for president as a third party candidate? Well, a lot of them are motivational speakers or authors or something like that. Now, Ron Paul did and I think he did it out of a sincere desire to change things.
And I say that because he stood for so many years in Congress by himself, just like Thomas Massey does today, and so I think he was sincere. But for the most part, the people were running for presidential candidate, they were just they were trying to get some attention. There's one guy, his name is Dick Body, who ran and it was at Chicago convention I was at and he had his father introduce him, and his father got up and said, I was really excited to learn about the Libertine Party. Well,
that's what people are going to think it is. With Chase Oliver, the Libertine Party were right back to the I've had people introduce me when this is David Knight from the Librarian Party? Is it? Because of the way I look what is It was not a household word, Libertarian wasn't and then when it became a household world word. I didn't like what the Libertarian Party
was doing on a number of issues. That's why I might Twitter handle is libertyitarian, liberty terarian to distinguish it from the libertarian because I feel like the Libertarians are getting away from liberty too much anyway. So then Ramaswami did a warm up for Trump because he's been advising Trump, and he's the one who's been saying, you know, hey, you need to say something about CBDC. They hate. Okay, I'll say something about I don't like CBDC.
Is that good? You know that that's your promise that he's not going to do CBDC, except that it was Jared, his son in law, and Steve Manuchain, the Goldman Sax banker, who were kicked this whole thing off and his administration before Biden doubled down on it. So what is the purpose of the Libertarian party getting three percent? Asked Trump? He says, you want to make yourselves winner as well as time to be winners. Now you
need to elect me unless unless you want to get just three percent. Libertarian may very well be in the room right now. I believe he actually had a friend. I got a friend who's a libertaryan let me tell you about him, who I become friends with through his writings in the American Spectator and
numerous other places. Watter an article yesterday in which he mentions just some of the things that make me a libertarian without even trying to get on that'st night, wrote, Trump will address the Libertarian Party at this National Convention on Saturday. The Libertarian Party should nominate Trump for president. In your dreams, maybe you don't want now he gets nasty, thank you. You you know, only do that if you want to win. If you want to lose,
don't do that. Keep getting you three percent every four years doing so. Policy and politics are as solid as the whole diamond. De Roy says this, this event. Yeah. Leroy says this, and leroight Leroy, he actually likes me. Leroy calls himself a libertarian. Leroy whoever, this Leroy guy is really likes me. You should vote for Trump. You should put Trump on, he says, talking to the third personal. Unless you don't want to win, You really don't want to You want to keep getting that
three percent. Because then when they boo him, right, when did it come a deeply wounded narcissist. He gets nasty right away, starts mocking them for their low vote totals, you know, because they're not gonna put him on there. So one person said after the speech, he has my vote because he's the only hope we have. Libertarianism is great, but we're not winning any elections. So she bought that we should put him on you know,
because I want to win. You see, not even the Libertarian Party delegates understand that we're not going to fix the problems that we have with centralized political solutions, not going to happen, not going to happen. They're all looking for you know. And I've said this about the Republicans, I'll say it about the Libertarians. I'll say it about Americans in general. We want
Big Daddy to come fix everything for us. I want Big Daddy in the White House, or Big Mama, right, or it'd even better if we got a woman, right. I want some big person, preferably a billionaire. If you're conservative or libertarian, you love people have made a lot of money. I want big Daddy in here to fix everything. And what you wind up with is big brother government doesn't fix anything, brings a lot of
new problems as well. This whole idea that all of our problems need to be fixed with bigger government or more powerful people in central offices just an unbelievable blind spot. It is truly amazing. But of course, you know, he mocks the Libertarian Party and their poor performance met with booze and heckling,
so he throws that card at them. In addition to the party delegates, Saturday's crowd also included Trump supporters who bought tickets, and when they periodically broke out in chance of we want Trump, libertarians drowned them out with end the fed. There was tension between the camps before Trump even took the stage.
Having been dismissed from the convention proceedings, party delegates entered the hall where Trump would be speaking to find that Trump supporters who had purchased spectator tickets were already in the front rows, despite previous assurances from party chair women Angela McCardell that
delegates would get the best seats. Verbal battles escalated into fisticuffs. Oh blows were had there, so they not only you know this, Angela mccartal not only brought the let the Trump supporters buy tickets, but put them in the front row when she had said that the delegates would have that. Trump responded to the jeers by making fun of the party's lackluster quadrennial showing. By far, the most sustained applause came when Trump announced that, if elected, he
would commute the sentence of ross Albrick. But you know again, he was silent, wasn't he on Julian Massage, on Ed Snowden or whatever. I will keep Elizabeth Warren and her goons away from your bitcoin, he said, Well, can you keep Jared your son in law and that goon Manuchin? Can you keep them away from it as well? I will put a libertarian in my cabinet, also libertarians and senior posts. One person in the audience shilled out Bolshevik or words to that effect. The crowd booed when he touted
his nomination from the NRA, because libertarians don't like the NRA. We see them as a bunch of political sellouts as well. I always did. I'm glad to see they still do their gun owners of America. I think is the real deal, not the NRA. And in real clear politics, even though they may only get one to three percent of the vote, it could be more than the difference in between Trump and Biden, and it could affect
the race in battleground state. So what is the current polling situation? They said, Well, in real clear politics, Trump is ahead of Biden by two and a half percent and a five way race, so they show Kennedy at ten and a half percent Biden at thirty nine percent and Trump at forty one point seven. But then when you look at the battleground states, they said the race will really be decided by the vote totals in seven battleground states. Trump is winning in six and tied and won, and he's got some
pretty big margins. And Nevada and North Carolina is up by eight according to them, Arizona and Georgia up by four, up by three in Michigan and Pennsylvania, tied in Wisconsin. But here's the deal. This is horse race politics. You know, we are we're six months out from the election, and well maybe about five months now, but you know, just just over five months out, anything can happen. Polls are not accurate, and this kind of stuff more often than not, is used simply to push public opinion
one way or the other. They don't pay the attention polls. RFK Junior and Trump accepted the appearance of Biden was also invited, but declined. The The Democrat turned independent RFK Junior received standing ovations when he promised to pardon Snowden and Assange. He also emphasized areas of commonality with libertarians, the importance to the Bill rights and the frightening authoritarianism of the COVID response under both Trump and
Biden. Trump, on the other hand, spoke of himself, and then when he was jeered, he attacked the Libertarians for their low vote totals. What I'm saying, it's kind of crazy. You know. You look at urk juniors like, well, I don't know if he's telling the truth or not, but at least he's you know, he's doing the rational stuff. Trump is just you know, back everybody. What is the purpose of the
Libertarian Party getting three percent? He said, Well, again, this is the bigger question, and it really is a good question, and the Libertarians need to have some self retrospection. This is what I asked myself when I was working with the Libertarian Party. What is the point of all this? You know, we get two or three percent for the governor's office or whatever.
Why are we doing this? It's very much like sisyphus. You know, you would go through all this effort to get on the ballot, you wouldn't get into the debates, you'd get one to three percent of the vote, and then you'd have to start the whole process over again, just like Sisyphis in the in the myth, you know where the curse was that you had to roll this boulder up to the top of the hill, and then when he got up to the top, it'd rolled down and he had to
do it again and never end, you know. And that's the way it was with libertary point, it's like, what are we accomplishing here? You know, we're trying to get more vote total, So what so we can stay on the ballot. You know, you get ten percent, you get to stay on the ballot. Otherwise you've got to go back and collect signatures and stuff like that in North Carolina. So why did we do that? What was the point to be on the ballot so we could roll the rock
uphill again. If you're going to get on the ballot and you're not going to use it to get somebody elected to local office and do something, there was no point in it. And it was really being in the Libertarian party that helped me understand the futility and the misdirection of efforts that the presidential race
really represents. And then of course what happened in twenty twenty solidified that we know that politics is local, we know that the schemes are global, but the politics are local, and that's the only place that you're going to stop it. And if you don't have a plan to do something locally, and it doesn't necessarily even have to be in politics, but if you don't have any local plans, why bother with this stuff? Come on, folks.
Mike Lee attended the convention and spoke on Trump's behalf. He engaged in blatant or Willianism, says reason, blaming paid agitators for heckling Trump. Seriously, seriously, Mike Lee knows better than that, a baseless accusation, wrongly claiming that actual convention goers will all in for Trump. Yeah, right, it was all they were all in for Trump. No, actually, you know
they're anyway. Trump then responds by saying that he would have absolutely have gotten the Libertarian Party nomination if he could have run, and then he slams RFK Junior, any slams a Libertarians, and he strikes out at everybody. So again, you know, when you look at Actually, I think RFK Junior made some friends there, but certainly I don't think Trump did. I think
he had some people that were already supporting him. Of course, and so if you want to know what some of the people did, there was a very good report that was done by by Reason magazine kind of summarizing the convention there and the appearance of these politicians. Donald Trump appeared before a raucous crowd of Libertarian Party delegates and his own supporters at the Libertarian National Convention in Washington, d C. Starchild, a longtime libertarian activist, was taken to the
ground by security after he held up an anti Trump banner. Trump drew his loudest booze after offering himself as the Libertarian Party nominee. The Libertarian Party should nominate Trump for President of the United States. Who I want if you want to win. I only if you want to win. Maybe you don't want to win. Maybe you don't want to win, and the loudest cheers when he pledged to commute the life sentence of Ross Albrecht's, creator of the black
market website The Silk Road. And if you vote for me on day one, I will commute the sentence of Ross Olbricht, who is sentenced of time, Sir, freeing Albrick. Something Trump failed to do when he had the chance as president was an item on a list of ten demands of the Libertarian Party submitted to Trump before the speech, and that was the only one who had even promised to post speech. Three Libertarian presidential nominees delivered a response,
but most of the crowded media had cleared out by then. Trump be the Libertarian nominee as you suggested, It is not April first, So no, I don't believe. And what about you? Are you ready to vote for Trump? Will you vote for him? I will vote for him if that's going to be best for our party. We have to decide. No, I'm not gonna vote for Trump. Are you gonna vote for Trump? Now? Yeah, that's kind of funny. Uh must have been a paid agitator.
According to Mike Lee, Well, you know, Trump was talking about how he could have been the nominee if he really wanted to, right, And one guy put out congratulations to real Donald Trump for getting six out of over eight hundred votes after begging the Libertarian National Convention to nominate him. And then Trump goes on an ego boosting Memorial Day posting spree after getting booed by the libertarians he had to do something to boost his ego and he's on Monday.
He did all that. But of course on Sunday, his son Eric put out a picture of he and his wife and Trump and Millennia and Eric and his girlfriend and said, you know, nobody has sacrificed more for this country than this family on Memorial Day? Does Eric know work care? You know? I mean Eric has got some real legal issues too, doesn't he. I mean he was the guy who said, look at this. You know, they indicted Trump here in New York. Trump built this town.
It's like, did he really I didn't know that. I'll have to write that down. Look that up. I don't know. Yeah, I don't think so. I don't think so. But of course he was being cheered by the usual Maga sickophants like Steve Bannon. Trump gets massive cheers before Libertarian National Convention. Was that what you saw there? Trump is on fire tonight, said Johnny Maga, and then Laura Lumer. Laura Looney wrote the entire
National Libertarian Convention erupted in cheers. And then yet and Alex Jones found something that he could cheer with what Trump said. You had ten things that they listed down there, the only one evidently that Trump promised that he would do, and of course they are his promises worth anything. The only way they promised was to free Ross. But Alix shows what his finger and stuck it
in the air to see which way Trump was blowing. And so now he said, I've declared war on RFK Junr, who he previously was touting phrasing profusely. You know that's the way things go, isn't it. On rock Fan, a Syrian girl, thank you very much for the tip, says judges are like a box of chocolates, but more likely to be filled with cyanide than caramel. Yeah, that's true, Marky, Mark New Jersey, thank you for the tip, He writes. They're over one thousand viewers in
the house this morning. Yah well, thank you, thank you, and please do like the stream. I think that does help. Thank you very much, appreciate that. On rock Fan, Wayne Wonder, thank you for the tip. And Rumble d G eight, thank you, says David. The reason Trump won't pardon Ross or Assange is because Trump promised Pompeo a cabinet position in twenty twenty five. Yeah, there's your libertarian right, I'm Pello. No Pompeo loves jailing whistleblowers. Is that how you fight the deep state?
Absolutely not, no, no. I think they had classes on doing things to whistleblowers too. He was at the CIA on Rumble Stealth Patriot. And of course the woman who was his deputy at the CIA, who became the CIA head. You know, she she gave classes on how to torture people and extract lies to get us involved in wars. And Trump promoted her, even though he said we were lying into a rocky promoted the person who sold the lies and tortured people. He made her the head of the CIA.
I just remember, remember, remember the fifth of November. I don't know what the November follows on, but that's something to remember. On Rumble Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip, it says Trump doesn't want to pardon doesn't want to pardon Asinge because a Signe presents more of a threat to the deep state than Ross all break. Yeah, that's right, therefore more of a threat to Trump exactly right. On rock Fan, Michelle Obaman says,
thank you for the tip. David, play one of your Christmas songs. After playing Little John's song, Please what Little John? I don't know. Do you know little John is one of the guys in chat is named John and he really likes the previous break. Oh okay, all right, well I don't think I've got any Christmas songs on here. I've gotten access to him. Okay, play a Christmas song, that's fine, you got one, go ahead and play it, or you got it ready where you
can play it right now? Go ahead. You're listening to the David Night Show, all right, and a little bit of Christmas music. And let's talk about some gifts that were sent to me via mail. These are some checks that we got in the last week, and I just want to read people's first name and last initial to thank them. John R, Ed C, James F, Scott C, Fred and Jackie you, John K, Kelly M, William G, Richard R. J B, Kelly F, Mark C. David and Deborah W. Thank you. And Patrick M and
Jack B. Thank you. All of you really do appreciate that. And so while we're on that subject. As a matter of fact, I had a listener. One of the questions are comments I should say that were sent to me an email. Roberts sent this to me last week because it really puzzled me when I looked at it, as I said, you know, there was an article from the New York Times talking about your your mic is open, Travis. I can hear you type in in there, diving away.
But the New York Times had an article talking about a Christian family and how they handled a kid that had been gas lit on gender in their school. And so the New York Times decided that it would engage in some theological debate with Christians, and so it said, well, you know, we know that there's there's not just two genders because you had Jacob and Esau, and Esau was it was harry, and Jacob was smooth, So what does
that mean that? And of course that is absolutely meaningless. You know, it was talking about the fact that one of them had a great deal of hair and the other one didn't. That doesn't say anything about gender. And then they had the strange thing they just threw in their one statement said and then Jesus talked about eunuchs, and I thought, just talk about eunichs. I can't remember that, And so Robert reminded me of that, and he says, for example, if you want to brush up on what Jesus said,
about eunuchs and the context. You know, you can go to King James Bible online dot org. Of course, you can also go to blue Letter Bible and things like that. There's a lot of them out there. There's a lot of them that you can find online. I think the Bible Gateway has got a lot of resources there as well. I like the Blue Letter Bible because it's you can look up a particular word, and I think you probably can on this one that he just talked about, and you can
find it everywhere that it's referenced. But I thought it was interesting when I went back and looked to see where Jesus talked about it, they completely mix missed what he was saying. He was saying, you know, you're asking me about is it okay to divorce your wife? And he says, haven't you read that God created us male and female the purpose of marriage. And he's talking to them about marriage and about not you know, looking at well,
how can I get out of this thing? You know, yeah, let me get He now, that's the wrong emphasis on all this stuff. And then he says some people are born unis, some people are forced to be unix, and some people become eunichs for the Kingdom of God. And so the question is if they're trying to say that, trying to correlate that into gender surgery, you know, becoming unix or whatever. That's not what
that was about at all in the context. Really, what it is talking about is whether or not people are going to marry or not, because the whole idea of marriage and having children were all tied together. Even in Greece, where homosexuality was widely accepted, they didn't have homosexual marriage because the marriage was about children, about creating a family. They didn't have homosexual marriage.
They might have had a marriage where they had children their thing, but and they might have been homosexual, but you know, they did not have homosexual marriage. So what he was talking about was, it doesn't make any sense that somebody would become a eunuch for the Kingdom of God. There's nothing in that Jesus or anybody said for somebody to have become sterilized or anything like that. It was really about marriage. Some people decide they don't want to be
married. I mean, certainly Jesus decided that, you had Paul decided that they were going to remain single. They didn't have to. You know, certainly Paul didn't have to. But that was a decision that they did for their work. It had nothing to do And this is why I say, it was so crazy to stop and think, what in the world are they talking about? Because I knew the context that they were talking about. It
was like Jesus never said anything about that. But anyway, he said, when somebody is traveling the fence political correctness about some topic being propagandized and trying to fit this into a more inclusive and sensitive opinion, he said, just ask them, do you really think God and Jesus have evolved? Or do you think that heaven and earth will pass away? But his word will not
pass away? And you know, you should always look up the what they're trying to tell people in terms of you know, when the New York Times has got an interpretation, look it up and see what in the world did they do? They come up with something about eunuchs that has absolutely nothing to do with anything. Well, we've had in some other news we've had in
Canada. This was sent to me by Giles, thank you very much, and he points out that in Canada they have this made program which is assisted suicide, and he said autopsies apparently show that the drug that they're using for Trudeau's assisted suicide is experienced as drowning for thirty minutes and it's to twenty four hours. Wow, that is amazing. Like waterboarding. I guess you waterboard people until they die. That's what this drug is doing. He said.
The paralysis induced before administering the drug prevents the patient from writhing and choking. However, is explain an interview with Jordan Peterson, that's the way that it works. But he points out he said, this information, however, is being withheld from the public. Why would they do that, Well, for the same reason they hide the pictures of aborted babies that are ripped to pieces. They don't want you to know why their policies of abortion or so called
euthanasia, you know, murder. They don't want you to know the horror of that and how they're torturing people, harming people. This is from dougalog I said, thank you, Doug. He left a tip earlier and he writes and he says, I want to let you know about finding you on Rumble using Roku. I have a Roku stick that plugs into the HDMI port on my TV. With Roku, I get Spectrum Internet TV selection as well as all kinds of apps. Rumble is one of them, he said.
The nhr A drag racing is on it my favorite. I found them in the Roku app store. Now we can get you and life size living color on our TV using the Roku. I cannot participate in the Rumble chat, but I figure that's what my computer is for. I heard you talking about today. You didn't seem quite sure how it all worked, and I wasn't, so thank you so much for telling everybody that. And then he references to me, and it's the first time I'd seen this. There's some kind
of a foot looking event in an Oklahoma public school. What will they come up with next? You know, isn't it amazing? You know what what they what they do in the name of education. I'll take another look at that, Doug, and I'll talk about that tomorrow. And then in Haiti, we have a couple of Christian missionaries murdered there, and you have some officials. We're trying to get their bodies home, and these gangs in Haiti are not releasing the bodies. A young couple that were missionaries to Haiti.
Some of the articles are saying they think their bodies have been burned after they kill them. One person, well, actually this was Senator Holly who wrote on X. The Father also wrote about it. He said, Natalie and Davy devoted their lives and spreading the Gospel and serving others. As Missouri mourns their loss, I ask you to mobilize all resources at your disposal to protect the transport of their remains back to Missouri. This is the least your government
owes our citizens, he wrote to Biden. And so it was actually a Missouri state representative whose daughter Natalie and her husband, both of them missionaries, were killed by gangs. He said. Two days ago, two mission Missouri missionaries, Natalie and Davy Lloyd, were brutally murdered by Haitian gangs as they were looking to minister to the Haitian people, said Holly. On the night they were besieged by gangs, my office urgently requested help from the US Embassy
and Port of Prince. Here's the thing, folks, don't expect help from your government, especially in a foreign country. They don't help you in this country. Natalie and Davy were ambushed by a gang of three trucks as they were coming out of the church. After being ambushed, Davy was taken to a house and tied up and beaten while gang members began stealing items. Davy's father told Wall Street journally tied up my son and beat him. They got
three vehicles, They got a bunch of equipment. Money. He said that I had on my payroll in there for the week. Davy was reportedly able to untie himself, as father told the Outlet. After being untied, Davy and Natalie, along with Jude Montes, the Haitian director of the organization, found shelter in a house us by Davy's parents. While on the phone with his dad, Davey revealed that a bunch more guys had shown up and the
windows in the house ended up being shot at. The gang members eventually broke into the house and killed the Lloyd's and Montes. A video which was reviewed by The Outlet showed Davy's and Montes's bodies having been burned. He says,
¶ An interesting resolution to the "Hate Crime" charge for man who destroyed the Satanic Temple's display in the State Capitol to troll Christians at Christmas
as I White write, Natalie and Davy Lloyd's remains are still not home and reunited with the families. Their government failed them in the hour of need. Now, I asked that you take all available steps to ensure the adequate security measures are in place to safely return their remains to the US. And so that's what Holly is asking Biden. Do you think he cares. I don't think so. An illegal case that has been playing out. You remember at
Christmas time he just played the Christmas song. Well, this is going back to Christmas and the Iowa and the Iowa Legislative Building. They had some religious displays up there, some Christmas stuff. I think they had some Honkas stuff and everything. So the Satanic Temple thought they would come in and put up a anti religion display. It's not a religious display, it's an anti religion display. It is anti freedom of religion, is what they put in.
They don't believe in Satan, they said, they don't believe in Satan, and so they're not worshiping Satan. They are trolling Christians and other religions because they want to shut down. You know, they figured that the reaction is going to be, well, if we shut down the Satanic display, that'll set up a bad example for free speech. Since when have they cared about that? Since when have they cared about precedents being set about the First Amendment.
Ever, they don't care about that stuff, and this is not a First Amendment issue anyways. I said, they don't have it's not they don't believe this stuff. And so you had a former Republican congressional candidate who saw this from out of state. Michael Cassidy, a Navy reserved veteran from Mississippi, traveled to Iowa and destroyed the Satanic display. Then they charged him with a hate crime when reality, the hate crime was being done by the Satanic
temple. And I don't think there should be such a thing as a hate crime. But anyway, it wasn't religious freedom. So they put this thing up and they said happy Holidays, Hail Satan. He said, my conscience is held captive to the word of God, not to bureaucratic decree. And so I acted. And they were very concerned because I said the presentation was damaged beyond repair. It didn't look to me like they'd spent a whole lot of time on it, though, you know, it's like some elementary school
project. Anyway, here's what I think is interesting. He was set for trial June third, but the court when the court denied a motion to dismiss the case that his attorney filed a guilty plea on Friday, and under terms of the agreement, he may be required to participate in a victim offender dialogue with representatives of the Satanic Temple. Now, I would love to be a fly on the wall for that. I would love to hear that dialogue between
him and the Satanic Temple final decisions on a Bible club. After seven months of anti Christian hostility, and this is in California, they said we're not going to allow the a voluntary organization for this particular activity, even though they do it and many other places they fought them, but eventually they have lost that fight. Before we take a break, I had an essay here from this is from expose a News and it was actually her comments, Ronda,
I wrote Wilson. It was an article that was written by Professor Matthias Desmond. And as we look at our society now, it's becoming more and more difficult to I can understand why nobody cares about policy issues, why nobody cares to talk about what the constitution says or what a law says, that you're not going to be able to sue companies that firearms, companies that are making
firearms, because no, we've got to criminalize all firearms. Even though we've got a specifical law, even though we got the Second Amendment, we got all these other we're just not going to pay attention to it. When you try to talk to people about things. In this world of postmodernism, we are really post truth is really where we are. It was a conscious pilot
¶ What is Truth?
who said, what is truth? What is truth? I don't care? And today that's what you get from people. You try to talk to them. They don't even care, they don't even want to. It's not even worth talking about truth. I got a truth, You got a truth. There is no such thing as truth. What is truth? Anyway? Well, as Rhoda Wilson says at Expose a News, she said, truth is the only remedy for a society that is sick of lies. Are you sick of lie? I am. I'm sick of a society that continues to go
down, circling the drain and going down even further. It connects people from soul to soul. As such, truth is the real cure for the loneliness, for the disconnectedness that makes modern human beings so vulnerable to propaganda. As soon as the group connected through sincere speech is energetically stronger than the propaganda's masses, the era of totalitarianism is over. So Professor Desmond says, one of the big questions of our time is what can we believe? He said,
we have humanity that is lost in a world of manufactured falsehood. Who will protect society from censorship and falsehood? Will it be from journalism? Is that where we're going to get the truth? He said. Walter Lippman won two Pulitzer Prizes and is considered to be the father of modern journalism. He said, here's a quote from Lippman's book, Public Opinion. He said, public opinion must be organized for the press if they're to be sound, not by
the press, as is the case today. This quote makes says as much as this he said from nineteen twenty two, forget the free press. You know, people are going to tell you what they want to tell you so that you'll buy, or they'll click, you'll click on the article, or you'll support it. That's what they tailor it for. Or maybe there's a hiddenogen it maybe there's some money under the table that's being given to them by the government or by a corporation to lie to you about the product or the
narrative that they're selling. And of course the narrative is the product for the government. What it's truly mind boggling, however, is that even when experts such as Gates and Fauci admit that the vaccine didn't stop the spreading of the virus, even when the experts of the Imperial College admit that the mortality rates of the virus were far lower than their models predicted, Even when that happens, a major part of the population doesn't really want to hear it. Then
when I heard about their their politicians either. Never in history is it demonstrated so convincingly that, indeed the most fundamental passion of the human being is not love, not hate, but the passion for ignorance. Upon closer consideration, the problem of deception in society is far more complex than just a bunch of manipulative propagandaists who mislead a guileless population. It seems that most people don't care
too much about being deceived. They even seem to admire those who deceive them. And that's what I see with the maga stuff. Oh it's forty chess, isn't that clever? You know, Trump is out there, he's lying to get what he wants. Do you ever think that he's lying to you? Well, that'd be pretty good, you know, if he's lying to all of us, because I know the truth. But you know these other maga people, maybe you know, they'll go along with him and maybe he'll
win. Let's just get what, you know, whatever it is that we want, Let's just lie to get it. That's all this forty chess that Alex is pushing out. There's early event. The detalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of that falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism instead
of deserting the leaders who had lied to them. Isn't that where we are now? The publicans see the people in journalism, people on the alternative media, the mainstream media, the politicians and both parties who lied to them. They've now got the proof and what they've done is they've retreated back to cynicism. Oh yeah, everybody does it. Yeah, there's no truth anywhere. We'll just leave these people in office and we'll vote for either Biden or for
Trump. They'll excuse the people who lie to them, and they'll retreat back to cynicism. They would protest that they'd known all along that the statement was a lie, and they would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness. That's the four D Chess thing. That was a slogan throughout twenty twenty for Dchess. Right back, you're listening to the David Knight Show. Well on
Rumble, Ratisbro, thank you for the tip. I appreciate that he says Americans need to learn what our forefathers said and we need to get our home in order before considering to travel or to help anyone abroad. Well, I agree. I mean when we look at you know, I think America could use some missionaries. I understand that people got a heart that they want to go to a particular area or something feel led to do that. I'm not going to criticize them for doing that, but boy, when I look around
America, I think God send us some missionaries. We need it worse than anybody here. We are. We are the epicenter of the filth that is going around globally. Even when we look at censorship, it is being you
¶ As the WHO Pandemic Treaty collapses, the US government will fund 100 countries starting pandemic policies.
got when you or the pandemic right. People are worried about whether or not the Pandemic Treaty is going to go through, and it looks like they've had a set back. They're now looking for billions of dollars more money. They're
now going to kind of pivot turn to the international health regulations. And yet while all this is going on, the United States is going to pay let me just repeat this, the United States a bide administration is going to pay one hundred countries, not counties, countries, and that's pretty much all of them, going to pay one hundred countries to start implementing these pandemic policies.
See that that works. They do it with the money. They do it with the Federal Reserve stuff that they have unlimited amounts of money that they can just hand out to people. That's why I say the order that Trump signed on that Friday the thirteenth was about releasing the money. That's what Biden is doing now. He's giving money to people to put the pandemic treaty in place, even though they can't agree on it at the World Health Organization. He
wants to pay the one hundred poorest countries to implement it themselves. That's how this all works. Follow the money, Follow the money, Jerry. Okay, So let's talk a little bit about pothole Pete. We're talking about liars and everything. If you're going to get somebody to be secondary transportation, of course you would go to a guy who was a mayor, a mayor in the town where Notre Dame is known for not fixing the streets and the potholes.
Pothole Pete, Transportation Secretary Pete booty gay. I call him that because he loves to That's his superpower, is dei privilege that he puts out there. That's what he runs on is being gay. So let's call him booty gay since I'm not really sure how to pronounce the rest of his name. Transportations acty beat booty Gay. So the climate change is one of the culprits behind increasing flight turbulence. You didn't know that, did you. You see,
climate change is being caused by flatulence isn't it. We've got to have vaccines for car for cal farts and and perhaps for humans as well. And so that flatulence is causing climate change, which is causing turbulence. So we could really say that flatulence causes turbulence, and that's kind of what he said. Reality is, the effects of climate change are already upon us in terms
of our transportation. We've seen that in the form of everything from a clever liar we should like him, even be possible threatening to melt the cables of transit systems in the Pacific Northwest. To melt the cables is becoming more and more extreme. And indications that turbulence is up by about fifteen percent that means assessment. So flactual everything that we can do about it. You're in the US well in the atmosphere generally, but certainly something that will affect American travelers,
whether here or abroad. Now, there are protocols and patterns for things like how pilots who encounter turbulence can notify those who might be coming in the path, but I do think they yeah continually reevaluate that. So there is on a bullfaced line to the nation, and she's absolutely incredulous here, your turbulence has happened. Well, you know, look, turbulence happens. Sometimes it just hits the fan. He says, Yeah, it can happen.
It can happen unexpectedly, and so we need to be very careful about it. And then she takes on this thing about the chargers. You know, the Federal Highway Administration says only seven or eight charging stations have been produced with a seven and a half billion investment that taxpayers made back in twenty twenty one. Why isn't that happening more quickly? So the president's goal is to have
half a million chargers up by the end of this decade. Now, in order to do a charger, it's more than just plunking a small device into the ground. There's utility work. And this is also really a new category of federal investment. But we've been working with each of the fifty states. Every one of them is getting formula dollars to do this work, engaging them in the first handful. Again, by twenty thirty, five hundred thousand chargers
and there's not a rifle of chargers. She's not buying it, she says, you seven and a half billion dollars. We're working, she said, seven or eight chargers you've been able to install in since November twenty twenty one with seven and a half billion dollars. Since he goes, you know, kind of last and like, come on, let's let's get real. No, he's just a really sophisticated liar. As Marxist, by the way, train Marxist's father was as a Marxist father spend his entire lifetime pushing the Marxism
that markses through the institutions. Thank you for joining us. Let me tell you the David Night Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else, You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.
