Thu Episode #2190: Trump-Cons Wage War on Constitutional Limits

Maybe that's what we should call them, instead of neo cons. We call them trump cons are a lot worse. They don't just push for foreign wars, they push for wars against the Constitution as well. So we're gonna take a look at that as well as uh, we're going to have a close look at this assassination attempt at il han Omar. Fight, Fight Fight. The politicians are becoming so ridiculous, aren't they. And Tony Orderman is going to be joining us at the bottom of the hour we talk about

what is going on with gold and silver. He know, it's more about what's going on with gold and silver folks than Jerome Powell does. He said, there's nothing to see here. Just move on. He's whistling in the graveyard. We'll be right back. Well we have rand paul I took on Marco Rubio talking about Venezuela, talking about an active war. You know, it's kind of interesting. We see the tactics abroad, you know, things that are supposed to help us abroad, we see them become instruments of tyranny

at home, don't we? So James Madison said, he said, the weapons of defense abroad become instruments of tyranny at home. Well, that was our foreign prophecy, wasn't it. If we're going to allow for the wanton murderer of people about due process, and to put it modly, an excessive use of force for the military being used as world policeman, then guess what you're going to have other federal police that are going to be doing the same thing to Americans domestically.

And that's really kind of what this back and forth was about. Is there going to be any restraint on the Trump cons Are they free to do whatever they wish and so all the fundamental principles, folks, we shouldn't be surprised of this. All the fundamental principles that we're seeing here being done by the Trump cons the Trump administration. It's the same stuff we saw with COVID. The utter contempt for the rule of law, for individual liberties, for

the Constitution, for the Bill of Rights. All the stuff that we saw in the last year of Trump is back again in the first year of Trump's second term. What a surprise. And so you had Senator Rampaul pressing Marco Rubio yesterday on whether Trump's actions in Venezuela, in terms of kidnapping the head of a foreign country and bringing him to the United States, was that legitimate? Is it a legitimate war? And it's kind of interesting because we see both Rand Paul and Cruse. I'm wondering when

we talk about this. Rand Paul has consistently been against war, and even Marco Rubio said, well, I got to hand it to you, You've been consistent on this issue regardless of who was president. Yeah, he's been consistent with Republicans and with Democrats, So good for him. I got my differences with Ram Paul and other issues like the vaccine stuff and everything, for sure, But nevertheless, let's give credit where credit is due, and he may be lining up

for another run of the presidency. Certainly, Ted Cruz was Ted Cruz in a much more cowardly way, was putting out in his own little devious way. He was putting out feelers for running for president. There were leaked secret tapes. You can put that in their quotes, secret tapes that came out of a donor meeting. You don't think they wanted that leaked deliberately. And in the donor meeting, Ted Cruz is criticizing Trump's tariffs and he says that he's

not sufficiently in the camp of Israel. So you can guess who the donors were that were there, the people that Ted Cruz is pandering to. Nevertheless, we see Ted cruis doing that. He's not, you know, leaking some tapes in a speech that he gave to his donor as well. Ram Paul is taking these people on directly, and so Paul argued during congressional hearing, the Trump capturing Maduro Venezuela and his wife would be considered to be an active

war if the US was not behind it. Maduro was originally indicted in the US and twenty twenty on narco terrorism charges. He's now facing trial in New York. Paul said, if a foreign country bombed our air defense missiles, captured and removed our president, blockaded our country, would that be considered an active war? And so Marco Rubio says, well, you know, I'll give you his response here. But Ram Paul says, now, I'm not saying that he didn't do

these things. I'm just talking about due process. And you see the similarity here. We're not saying that these people that ICE is looking for deserve to be here. We're

not saying they don't deserve to be in jail, they don't deserve to be taken out of the country. But as Sean Hannity point out and Joe Scarborough said, I can't believe I'm agreeing with Sean Hanndy on something. What they're talking about is there's ways to do this without the kind of violent escalation, chaos and thumbing their nose at the rule of law and the constitution. There's many ways that this approach could be handled. How do we get to the point where we've got to be in

one camp or the other. One camp says we're going to be the United Smallies of America. Just let everybody come here and live off of us, and the other one says, no, we're going to have a police state. Is there some other alternative to that? I say there is, and even Sean Hannity saying that there is. So here's this clip of Rampaul and Marco Rubio.

I think, though, if you reverse the circumstances, it becomes very difficult for these arguments to hold up. So I would ask you if a foreign country bombed our air defense missiles, captured and removed our president, and blockaded our country, would that be considered an active war.

So Paul said, what I'm saying is that our arguments are empty. Then the drug bust really isn't an argument. It's a ruse. The war argument, it's not a war and it is a war. Saying both of those things, that is a ruse, he said, it's not a real argument. We do what we do because we are we have the force we have might we do it because it's in our interest. So we wouldn't let anybody come in and bomb us and blockade us and take our president.

We've had arguments about legitimate and illegitimate presidents. We've had arguments about battle elections and rigged elections, and so there's all these same kind of arguments that we've had in our country that they've had in Venezuela. And so that's the bottom law, folks. It's the disregard for law and morality. They're used as weapons abroad, right, we don't care about what's happening abroad, and so we bring that same attitude

back home. These are people saying we have to defend our borders and we have to get rid of these illegal immigrants. And yet the people who are so pro border, and I'm pro border, but I don't see how you can support political borders when you don't support political boundaries. You have political boundaries, you don't have the right to be an office. You don't have the authority to be in office if you're not going to be bound by the boundaries that are outlined in the constitution. So shut

up about borders if you're not going to follow boundaries in your own country. That's where we are, folks. That's why I begin with that as well. And so we have Minnesota's Chief judge, the one that is going to war with Trump on the Ice issue. As a matter of fact, he has demanded that tomorrow the head of ICE come to his court and explain why he is

disregarding the judge's orders. And it's kind of telling to see the way Homeland Securities Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, the contempt that she has for this judge and really for the rule of law. It's also interesting to see that this guy is a conservative. Many people say he's low key. George W. Bush appointee, confronting Trump's immigration tactics, ordered ordering the head of ICE to come to his room and to explain in his courtroom why they're ignoring what he

said in terms of following reasonable procedures. This is a guy who clerked twice for Scullia. This is a guy who fought for Robert Borke, perhaps the most conservative judge that's been nominated in my lifetime for the Supreme Court. And so this is a guy for whom the rule of law stands large. In other words, a real conservative if you look at it from that standpoint. I don't

know politically who he votes for. They said, well, we've seen him doing this and that with this group, and he left a law practice for a while and taught at Notre Dame University where Amy Cony Barrett went, and he endorsed her for Supreme Court. But of course we all make mistakes. I got to say, she looked good on paper to me, and yet you know, we can see where she is. She doesn't really grasp or care

much for the Constitution or originality. But this guy sixty five, as he's doing this, of course he's been anybody who pushes back against Trump's arbitrary dictates and whatever he's doing has got to be a leftist, right. This is the danger of this tribalism. It's like I said, these people are not going to leave us alone because we're not Republican, not Democrat. They're going to come after us. Well, you know, you must be the other side, right, You're either with

us or you're the enemy. You're either with us or you're a terrorist. We're seeing a lot of that now with the videotape that came out yesterday of Alex Pretty first it came out that he had had rib broken by an encounter with Ice, and I don't know if that was the same video as this other one. I didn't really pay much attention to it because it's not your maane to the killing. It's not your mane to it. On that particular instant incident, he's outraged, he's yelling and screaming,

he's combative. He kicks the car that the ice agent's ran and kicks out the tail light. I'm surprised there's that easy to kick that cars are made out of plastic. Now, it's amazing, but he did significant damage to it. And see, see he's he's a criminal. And you could see that he had a gun that was in his tucked into the back of his waistband and his pants, just like he didn't really took it out and killed him the other day. But that's not what they did with wasn't

And it was visible in this particular one. And so you got all these conservatives saying, see, you know he's a terrorist, you know he's a violent he's looking for a fight. Well, I got to say, if you go back to January sixth, right, we've seen the pictures of the Democrats that do the same thing. The Democrats did the same thing to demonize everybody that was there on January the sixth, and they did it without showing any context.

I mean, if you just show it after somebody has been in rage because they've been pushed, shoved, not to the ground, tear gassed, and then they lose it and fight back, Oh now I'm justified in killing you. If you depending on where you start this video, you can tell whatever you want to say about the events. We've had a lot of people who were there on January sixth who said the Capitol Police started this, kicked this off,

escalated it. I've been at a lot of demonstrations. I've seen that type of thing happening over and over again. I can easily believe that's what happened, and we do have video footage that would indicate that. And so we don't know what happened before this that got him so outraged about this. And it's not to excuse it. Right, what he did was still wrong, and it's not to excuse of the people on January the sixth. Did they get into a fight with the police. They break out windows,

they commit vandalism, property to stuction, go to jail. However, the problem with January the sixth was the excessive punishment. I never had a problem with the people who were fighting. You know, regardless of what the provocation was, you start fighting and destroying property, you go to jail, but not for decades, and you don't they don't get a chance to torture you in jail, and so all this stuff

is so excessful. And if you get upset with the cops and you speak back to them because they're angry that you're filming them, that's not a license for them to kill you. That's why we have the clause about excessive punishment. So we have the clause about due process. Now. On January the sixth, what the Democrats did was they took these videos that people were fighting, took them without the entire context, and they said, Okay, these people are

violent revolutionaries, and everybody there is a violent revolutionary. You see the conservative tribe doing that now as well, I shouldn't say the conservative tribe, the Trump cons are doing that now. They're painting everybody with the same brush. And then they're demanding that there should be no limits to the punishment that's inflicted on people. It needs to be absolute, including lifetime in prison for the Democrats, or taking your

life if you're Republican's right. And so that's the issue here, keeping this stuff in perspective, keeping it within the constitution and due process, keeping a balance with it. That's the challenge that's here. Yes, there were some things that were done wrong, things that should even be punished. That he did wrong doesn't entitle them to kill him at all. And so when you look at this judge who's pushing back on these confrontational tactics from Ice, again, todd lyons

was an appropriate name for somebody that's there. Is why the trump Kin administration with Ice, give me that guy whose name was Lion, I could use them. You know, christinome is is there. That's her middle name, I guess as well as is Tricia mcglonklin. So Judge Schultz schlitz brother is just another activist judge who is clearly more concerned about politics than the safety of Minnesotan's said Tricia mcglonklin.

She doesn't care about the safety of people in Minnesota. Does this judge really think that Director Lions should take time out of his day leading ICE to target the worst of the worst criminal illegals, including murderers, rapists, pedophiles, terrorists, in our country to testify to hearing or one illegal

aliens removal proceedings. This is a woman who lied when they took that elderly man who had been here for thirty five years from Laos, when they invaded his home like some kind of a dystopian science fiction movie like Brazil, drug him out in his underwear, he grabbed blanket as he was going out into ten degree weather and then drove him around for an hour before they could verify

who they even had. And she comes back and says, yeah, they were looking for some rapists and pedophiles and all this whatever, right, and shows a picture of two guys that never lived there. They said, we don't know who these people are. And even if they had lived there, they were not there then. And they're in their twenties and this guy's in his sixties I think looking at him, and he might be late fifties, who knows. But all of it was a lie. That was a lie that

was sold by this same woman, Tricia McLaughlin. So one person said, actually this is politico. Politico says Schlitz is perhaps an unlikely figure. He carved his professional identity in traditional conservative circles see Politico thinks that Trump is a conservative. He's not a conservat He's a New York Democrat. And these authoritarian Nazis around him are not conservatives either. We need to come up with a new name. I like Trump cons like neo cons. So he advocated for Robert Borke,

like I said before, clerked for Scalia twice. The Senate confirmed him unanimously. One person who's a law professor and was a former federal prosecutor, Mark Osler, said he comes from a traditionally conservative point of view, but he's a rule of law guy. Imagine that. Of course, if you're a rule of law guy, you're conflict with the Trump cons He's been regarded as a rock solid, generally conservative

judge on the bench. But with that comes things other than loyalty to this administration, because this administration has no loyalty to the rule of law, and so we have as people are starting to push back against this. Here's Arlington County board chair says Ice. If you see Ice in Arlington, call nine to one to one. He said, And I disagree with his position about immigrants. He said, to our immigrant neighbors, you belong in Arlington. No, they don't.

We need to end the welfare magnet. But we need to do this with do process. We need to do it humanly, orderly and remove them, and there's ways to do that. And he said, you are a part of this community. Well no, Actually they should not be voting and they should not be getting money either. You know, when we talk about immigrants, I don't think legal immigrants ought to be able to get in any taxpayer money.

I think one of the conditions of becoming an American citizen is that you're going to declare your independence from government and that you're not going to come here as a dependent. Most countries in the world have a requirement that you can show that you can support yourself and your family before you're allowed to immigrate to a country. We should be doing that as well.

a cultural group, and that type of thing. And that's fine, But as you pointed out, if you're going to bring in tens of thousands of people and put them in one area, and then they get started on massive amounts of money from the federal government, a couple of billion dollars. Right It's like, well, you know, there's this large pot of money there, we might as well go get it. You know, that's a great way to train them. And what is what are the Trump cons doing about this?

They are going to increase that. Right now, the pot of gold for refugees that acts as a magnet for them to come here is six billion dollars. Trump and Mike Johnson and the GOP want to increase that by five billion dollars. That's an eighty percent increase that they want to do for that. So ICE's approaches do designed to provoke right now and to seek out conflict. I agree with that. I agree with that. I don't agree

with what he says about citizenship. And one of the reasons that he's saying that, you know, our immigrant neighbors, you belong this community, blah blah blah. He's saying that because that's twenty two percent of the people in that community. That's enough to keep him in office. And that's an aspect of this as well, that we should talk about and so, as I said yesterday, ICE's approach is designed to provoke right now and to seek out conflict. And

here's here's the numbers for the previous five years. Each year, the number of ICE and Border Patrol shootings will be anywhere from zero to five. Except this year, the first

year of Trump. Trump, where they are, where they are seeking out conflict, We've had not zero to five, We've had twenty eight shootings and eight people killed by ICE. So they pointed out they think that the Trump administration appears intent on converting law enforcement into military intervention. I agree with all the trappings and appearance and the posture of some sort of regime change. And you can see this when you look at the pictures. There's one in particular,

a guy who was in the military. I think he's marine. Then both Afghanistan and a rock. He said, look at this, pull up that picture of Travis. It's a couple of articles down. Yeah, the height of close combat weaponry is on this woman's doorstep. In this picture. You've got I count seven people lined up, and you got one lady at the door. So a woman at the door. They got seven guys. They're all lined up with body armor and weapons for combat, for house to house combat. If

that isn't the excessive use of force. You know, when in nineteen eighty when Karen and I went to the UK, went to England for a horneymoon, we were very impressed with the way the Bobby's conducted themselves. They've now become Americanized, but back then they would go as Roger, what's the guy's name, Bobby's on bicycles two by two with England swings like a Pinchulin two. Anyway. I can't remember the last name of this songwriter, but you probably remember who

it is. I wanted to say Roger Moore, and it's like, no, it's not Roger Moore. He's British anyway, the American, the American songwriter. But that's the way they'd go two by two. They had radios in case something really got bad. Oh, and they had whistles, those horrible whistles that really set

off ice, and they were very polite to everybody. You start getting real horsey when you've got a gun, when you got guns sluing on, and when you've got body armor and you got weapons to fight a war, it completely changes your attitude and instead of walking a beat, you start driving a car, which is what's happening in the UK with law enforcement there as well.

But notice how that's now become accepted practice. Now they're just saying, wait a minute, you need a warrant to kick somebody's door in without a knocking even And now Homeland Security says, no, we don't need a warrant. We can do that anytime we want. We can do a

full on military raid under your house anytime we want without a warrant from a judge. We will generate our own warrant internally, our own organization will do it. Defining feature of the American experiment is that citizens are not meant to live in fear of their own government. The Constitution was written against the backdrop of arbitrary arrests, general warrants, and the abuse of unchecked government power, with the express purpose of ensuring that the government would secure the rights

of the people rather than endanger them. As a result, Americans have not historically lived under the fear that they might be taken from their homes and the discretion of a vengeful, petty or over zealous political authority. I'm looking at you, Trump cons As a matter of fact, that's what that guy was saying that I did agree with. He said, I'm a city councilor here, but I live in fear of these people, you never know what they're going to do. They have absolute immunity to do whatever

they wish, no matter how violent. And so if you don't think that that describes democrats as well as the anti Second Amendment Trump neocons, because you know Trump is a New York City Democrat, you need to think about where this is headed. He says, Yes, law enforcement has always a existed, but its power has always been restrained. In America. The Fourth Amendment was adopted precisely to prohibit arrest and attentions based on mere suspicion or official convenience.

In America, suspicion is insufficient. The government must provide evidence and submit itself to legal restraint before it can deprive someone of liberty. And again, when we look at the Declaration of Independence two hundred and fiftieth anniversary this year, as it began a long train of abuses, and that's how we got here, folks. It's been a long train running. It began with things like reco statutes where we can take everything from you before we even start the trial.

That metastasized into civil asset forfeiture, where we take everything from you without even charging you with a crime, let alone convicting you. So with RICO, we charge you with a crime, then we take everything. Then you go to a civil asset forfeiture. Well we don't even have to charge you with the crime. We're going to charge your property with a crime and there'll be no due process right. And then we go from that to the no knock drug raids, and now we go to the no knock

drug raids with no warrant. It's a long crane of abuses and you can see that Trump is fully on board with this, as he was talking in the first administration, take the gun and do the due process later. Well, they're not going to do any due process. We're going to take a quick break here because I really do want to and we'll come back to this, but I want to talk to Tony about what's going on with Gold.

We've got a couple of questions from people for Tony and if you've got any you can give them to us and we will pass those on to him.

I thought, Wow, this is the level of political discourse that you get on social media Anymore's pathetic.

honest with anybody. So Goldman Sachs is saying, we're looking at the demise of the dollar and it's just getting started. It's what they said. And well, last time we talked, we could go on Thursday. What was the price of gold? Was it about forty forty seven hundred what was it.

in real time. And he's like, we've had no contact, and well that doesn't.

So I've been around a long time in bitcoin to say it's lagging, but I think where all bets are off, everything's being repriced. Bitcoin will probably go last because you've got to remember, gold and silver are the old historical money. They're tied to the human experiences. You know, it's biblical, it's inside of our traditions. So it's obviously going to go first. And you know, I see a lot of price predictions. I think some of them are completely irresponsible

from some of these commentators, especially in my space. I don't like to make price predictions, but I do think that there's something else is happening. David and I've been running, just like for my own curiosity, running the simulations on what the price of gold would need to be if the major central banks wanted to reprice their currencies in gold, and it looks like it's it's far north of what

it is now. But if you take their gold holdings and you wanted to reprice it for their into the money supply, and it's in north of you know, thirty five forty thousand announcement, I'm not saying that's where we're going, but something is afoot. If you wanted to to reprice something, this is how you would do it. And you know, the US, for so long as you know we've covered this, has been in a had a active role, especially the Central Bank and FED of suppressing the price. So I

don't think they can do that anymore. And I think that's clearly going up in the price of silver, not just gold, but you know, silver is following gold, and goal's being repriced. Silver's being repriced, and nothing seems to be a governor on that anymore.

stable coins are really just a relabeled CBDC. It has a kind of private public partnership aspect to it, a kind of fascism corruption thing as you would expect from Trump administration. It also helps them to pretend that it's not the same as CBDC, but it's a way for them and their buddies to make money as well. But we just saw teather just disappear one hundred and eighty million something dollars out of several Wallace just seized, froze it, sees it and freeze it, and sees it as what

they do right. And that's a warning to everybody, I think, And as we look at how things are changing. You and I have talked for a long time about the warning about paper gold and paper silver. We don't know that stuff is for real either. I don't know if they've really got the gold or silver that's there. And when push comes to show we may find out that they don't have it, which case, the shares that you've got in those companies off the Shanghai Gold Exchange just

plummet if confidence disappears. You are not buying a tenth of an ounce of gold or silver. What you're buying is shares in a company that promises that they're going to be accumulating gold and silver. So physical possession, whether you're talking about the so called stable coins, which are not stable and they're not coins, the way that they can freeze and seize anything that you've got by design, that was something that was in the Genius Act that

Trump put through there. So whether you're talking about that,

or you talking about paper gold or silver or any kind of tokenized derivative schemes that are coming out of Wall Street, be very careful about that. And the approach that you want to take is with physical gold and physical silver. That's why what you do, Tony is so important.

And some of that is happening. I mean, I think it's more widespread than it's ever been in my lifetime, especially since nineteen seventy one, that people are skeptical of the monetary system. But this has started governmentally across the across the world. It's an international phenomenon of mistrust and reallocation of funds and resources. And we covered this a

few months ago. David. I thought it was a big news that they have the storage for goal physical goal, not only in Shanghai, that they're starting new storage facilities and moving the exchange there. I know JP Moore is taking their gold desks there, but also in Hong Kong. I thought that was big news. And they're building you know, massive storage facilities just outside the airport for physical storage.

So it's not you know, the firms that used to control so much of the paper market, and that was just seen. Hey, if you wanted a hand and you know, or do something in gold or silver, and as far as following the price or the spot, this is what you would get into. You know, there's not a lot of risk here you can just you don't have to hold the gold or stored anywhere. You just buy in its spot and you can cash out. Of Course, they'd never pay you in gold or silver through any of

those funds. They would pay you in fiat if you cashed out, because it's just priced against the spot whatever those medals were. And of course there's storage is expensive all the rest. But I think I started to see a trend about three years ago, especially after the sanctions

on Russia backfire. There's this big blowback that happened with the ruble rebounding, and they started doing those cross border payments with not only gold but petroleum and other things with and direct trades with China and India, and I started thinking, this is this is going to be interesting as the de dollarization continues. I started watching these big trades going on that were multinational corporations and governments starting to pull you know, more gold into the system physically

and then move it around. The repatriation of gold, I thought it was a big story that didn't get covered the way it should. A lot of these countries.

We can't trust the Federal Reserve. And so if that's their position, and they can't trust the Federal Reserve, and I don't trust the Federal Reserve either, but I don't

think they're going to disappear Germany's gold. But if that's their position, if Germany is worried about the Federal Reserve's vaults in terms of holding gold, maybe you want to think twice about putting your money into paper gold and paper silver, hoping that the Chinese have got the actual stuff to back up what they're selling you in their vaults in Shanghai. You might get shang hied with all this stuff, right.

off to the races. We got to remember, we had these these periods like twenty and eleven where silver got close to fifty or trading at fifty and then fell back down because of the FED was able to step in and calm things down. Ben Bernanki was the key figure there. He's like, wait, this isn't going to happen again. We're not going to do more tarp funds, We're not going to do massive qi or bailout things. And it

calmed the markets down. Those days are never coming back, and we're you know, we're seeing this is the culmination all those years of being boring, all of those paper trades that were going on in active suppression. David. I mean, I've seen it in real time in my business. I've seen the suppression through through Wall Street and there. They

can't do it anymore. I just don't think they have the resources or the ability to cover the spread or do anything on selling off major So I think the race is on for the for the repricing.

he says. Mike Shedlock said a couple of years ago that if gold ever hit ten thousand and silver was hundreds of dollars, He said, it would never happen, but if it did, you wouldn't want to leave your house. What's your comment about that, Tony, Well.

to catch up. I mean, gold could go to ten thousand in the next year. Would it break the system? Probably not. There's just a there's a there's a long way to go in the repricing of all this. And what does that even mean? I mean, really, how many for you to price things in dollars anymore? Do we really know the true extent of the devaluation that's gone on? Are we just so psychologically programmed to give these things

value that we continue to do that? And I think that metric is that's what's being worked out right now. We're in an undiscovered country, a new pricing territory that's never happened before, because we've never had I mean, nothing can go back, and you can't really historically overlay what we've done in the last fifty plus years with our currency. It's never truly gone on or gotten that big. You know.

We never had a fiat currency that was worldwide in everything and uh and then being you know, de dollarized rapidly, So we've never seen that before. So I don't know what pricing strategy I would say, if if if silver, like some of these yahoos on I see that to see a lot of these commentators, people that want to get clicks and they'll put on you know, five thousand dollars silver, you know whatever. I see those people all the time. If you're that amount, maybe you can't go outside.

At a certain level, it doesn't matter, you know what. At a certain level that repricing in dollars is it's kind of absurd.

isn't buying silver. Healp Impact News thinks that many people aren't buying. Many gold and silver dealers aren't buying.

And that was the only time in the history of my shop or since wise Wolf through I just gave a blanket order. We're not going to buy anything. And because when people needed to work, they've been snowed in for days. So today we're going to be buying again. And you know, the the difficulty is you have to look at every single thing that you buy, or every

every docket of things. I have to figure out where I'm going to source and where I'm going to see a lot of times this gets Thank goodness, I've been able to pass on stuff like that to Wolfpack people. Any of the Wolfpack members have been getting like if you do constitutional wolf, you're getting stuff at melt. So like I can still, I can still buy ninety percent US silver, which most dealers and then refiners aren't buying.

So I really have no except for one place. But it takes three weeks to get paid anywhere to take ninety percent silver. But that doesn't mean that ninety percent is not a good long term hold. As a matter of fact, I think it's one of the best upside things you can be doing right now. And people I think are confusing. They're like, well, I held this silver

all this time, why can't I sell now? Well, you're talking about a bottleneck system where you know countless people are trying to do the same thing that you did. You need to just let it calm itself out and then price is for the percentages that for buying will rise again. But this this market is you know, there's no whare for me to sell hurling silver. Does that mean sterling silver like flatwear, knives and jewelry and thing? Does that mean that is not worth anything, of course not.

It just means that the refiners are overloaded, dealers are overloaded. There's no liquidity right now. But if you give it enough time, we'll just sort itself out. You know. The rush to sell. If I'm somebody that's held silver a long time, you got a few options, But honestly, I'd want to see where the price goes and lets let things settle out, because I think that they will.

one nobody's buying silver. Everybody wants to sell silver. And that was last summer. Everybody wanted to sell it. And they said, yeah, that the institutions can't get enough of it, but the retail trade doesn't want to buy any of it, and they're also feeling economic pressure in terms of yeah, I need the money right now. So, you know, it was kind of an interesting thing, especially when you look

at this some of these people. If these dealers said I can't buy anymore right now whatever, they're probably regretting that, and the people who sold it last summer probably regretting it as well. It's amazing because that was just before it took off like a rocket.

across the board, there's something. There's something terribly wrong. But but I do think that if you if you look at who's buying, that's that's the tell. And we do get and we still have customers, but I get people to send me stuff. David all the time, and they're like, is this how your shop is? And they'll send me some YouTube video of some dealers somewhere going people are lined up around the block and they're buying all the silver I have, and I'm like, it's not my experience

in two different states. Or the phone like, that's not that's not how you know, And I and my phone rings constantly. I have a full time person just answering the phone. Well, try to get to every call.

never been in this situation before. These prices are so high that I have to reevaluate how I even look at my own the packages like okay this I used to think, okay, we'll put XX and in it, and I can't, you know, I remember, save me some.

forty dollars in melt just for the halves. And so I put a silver dollar yesterday in the Warrior Wolves, which like one twenty five, and I think we can squeeze out of gold back on top of It's it's just insane, and so it's it's harder and harder to do what we do, and then you know, finding quality variety to put in the packs, and that's just because of the price.

that they have to play a certain game. They have to hold a certain amount of dollars. I believe this is the way that I think their ticket, their their acceptance at the table of whatever billionaires do. I think they have to hold a certain amount of dollars in the system. So I think it probably would be an exit right beforehand. Like if you want to look closely see where these billionaires and others are going up in

this timeline to see where you should go. And I think they'll be placing more into physical assets along in the next two to three years, see massive flows out of the dollar and into it could be even real estate or I think, but it'll be commodities, yeah, and something that's even maybe even two gold back stable coin stuff like that.

up and it's two thousand and it's more. I'm like, whoa, whoa, whoa. It just really surprised me, and I said, is that right? And I'd go back through and recalculate. Yeah, platinum is a is a good play. I don't do enough of it. I hold some of it just because I mean, long term, any of you to remember any of these medals, if you can physically hold them and buy them at a good price and you're not just paying some collectible fee or some nonsense. If you can get in there and

just hold them long term, you're going to make out. Okay, Yeah, I mean it's real, it's going to happen. It's real, and people need to make things out of it. And I think platinum they need that for these catalytic converters. And although I'd.

money over the years. But you have to remember, it's just like anything else, something is worth what somebody will pay for it. So if you're interested in historic coins or something like that, just make sure you're not going too far into the blue sky of you know, ethereal Worth. You know, people call me all the time say I had looked it up online and this quarter is worth

ten thousand dollars. I'm like, well, maybe it is if you could sell it, I mean, and I just you know, that's a it's a very small pool of people that do collectibles, and you got to know who those people are. And I've been in business for ten years and I don't know many people. It's so I did, and I

haven't been asked. You know, no one calls our phone and says, hey, I'm really looking for this, you know, eighteen seventy nine gold coin and it's you know, it's a Carson City or whatever, and I want to pay Nobody really does that. It doesn't mean it's not out there, but i'd be really careful. I think it's a good time time to buy some of the pre nineteen thirty three gold if you know the right people that you're not paying too much. That's always a good American pre

nineteen thirty three gold is always a good play. I like the five dollars, ten dollars and two and a half dollars Indians too. Those are just a really iconic looking and beautiful coins. And right now you can still get them for closer to the to the melt price, which is insane right now.

of collectible, you know what you're talking about. And you've got to get it graded, so somebody, independent party has certified you know what this thing is and condition it's in, and so you always get a that with a collectibles And I guess my bigger question would be if society breaks down, how do you evaluate the purity of gold

if you're not a dealer? Right? You know, when somebody gives you a piece of gold, you got the capability to do that, But how does ordinary person evaluate that this isn't a slug, that it's coated in something if you're trying to exchange with somebody else, right.

sure it doesn't pull the magnet. That's one way to do it. And then weighing it. Weight is really important. It's like the diameter and the weight. Now, they have some really good fakes now, And if I was this was a you know, a post dollar system and I was borthering, I'd make sure that I stayed in small denominations. I wouldn't take one ounce gold unless I could verify it myself, unless there was some verification process. But if you stick to the smaller stuff, that's why I think.

So yeah, it's very important for people to understand that. Anything else you want to tell us about what's happening at wise Wolf Gold this week, besides the snow and got snow and you've got rapidly accelerating prices. It's a difficult environment to work in, isn't it.

and hold for a little while. Very soon it will be some sort of profit taking and other things. But I don't. I think we're in a territory where you know, patience will serve you. Well, that's right, making any sort of I think big moves right now as far as selling or anything. I think if you can hold, if you can afford it, I would.

we live in no doubt about it. Well, it's always a pleasure talking to you, Tony, and I know the people who have done business with you are very happy that at this point that they've done business with you. And again, you know, have a portion of your wealth that's going to be in diversified in something that has been stable. And it's not that that gold is getting unstable or silver is getting unstable. When we see the

prices changing. That is really, as we pointed out, that's the reflection of what you're pricing gold and silver in being unstable, whether it's the US dollar or some other currency. And so what we're looking at here when we see these dollar values changing so rapidly, you know, it's kind of like a hyperinflation. You've got a loaf of bread and all of a sudden, you know you've got to have a lot more somoleans to get that bread. I mean, the bread is appreciating in value like that, but it's

it's that the currency is going down. And that's really what we're seeing here, a lot of different things coming together. And again I only see it getting worse once gets old of the Federal Reserve. He is an agent of chaos and people are going to be scared to death about it what he's going to do, whether he does anything or not with it. But I expect him to do something with it, so we'll see I do too.

of law. They don't care about any internal boundaries on what they do. And that's a very dangerous thing. As they point out. In this World Magazine article, it said conservatives should be well acquainted with the problems associated with expanding government power. You would think, wouldn't you, and the service of quote unquote extraordinary circumstances and again that's why I say, we can't call these people in the Trump

administration conservatives. Politico labels them as conservatives, but there's something else. Just like we made the distinction about neocons and people who are not conservatives and traditional sense the word, they won't have wars everywhere. These are Trump cons and I think we're starting to see a particular pattern with them to understand that there's something very, very different. And as they point out on this, you know, it's just recent history.

They say in the World magazine article that quote unquote, well meaning public officials severely restricted civil liberties to address various COVID related quote unquote emergencies. And again, if you understand what was happening there, that's why I reacted so strongly and so quickly to what was happening with Venezuela, what was happening in Minnesota and other places like that. This is a harbinger of things to come. It is a pattern of behavior that we've seen from Trump between

two different administrations. And so they went on to say, we've spent a large part of the last two decades lamenting the leaders who give lip service to free speech and to religious freedom, only to become enemies of the same when they were found to be offensive or discriminatory. The very reason the founders enumerated fundamental rights in the Constitution was because they understood the necessity of bright lines that cannot be crossed, regardless of circumstance, regardless of you

labeling something an emergency. Political leaders are adept at explaining why freedom must be limited. They always do it with assurances that this restriction is going to be very narrow and very short lived, and it is entirely for our own good and our own safety. But we ought to always be skeptical about that. That's why I said, especially when it is a government created problem like the border, and they offer you an authoritarian solution, like the tactics

of ice that we see now. So when the government looks for reasons to make it easier to break into somebody's house or to make an arrest, we should think long and hard about what that can mean before we give that a green light. And again, remember the outrage that conservatives had when Trump's house mar Lago was searched.

They don't care about you, right, It's outrageous. Look at that that searched his house It's like, I understand that was law, but I said at the time, well, at least he didn't get a no knock swat team rate. At least they didn't come in throwing flash bangrenades and the baby's cribs and things like that, which we've seen. That's the treatment that many ordinary people, especially the poor

people get in this country. America is so committed to the dignity of every person that we give rights to people who break our laws when they enter our country and who break other laws once they're here. Yeah, we

pay a price for that, but we sometimes we get something as well for that. Because we treat people well even when they don't deserve to be treated well. It assures us that we will be treated well when we deserve it. He say, it's not just a pragmatic thing. This is a Christian value. This is why they get it on this Christian publication. And I've said for the longest time, we give rights to people, right. We don't give these rights to them, God gives them to them,

and we get into trouble. And I've had a lot of people get very angry with me. I've had a lot of angry stuff said to me when I defended due process for foreign citizens who are here illegally, you understand that we possess our rights not because of some privilege, even if it be the privilege of government granted citizenship right government defined citizenship. I have the rights that I have and you have the rights that you have because we are created in the image of God, and we

need to understand that. And when a government can disregard those God given rights for other people, other people who have created who committed crimes. This is why, even when we get a slew of witnesses and video from five or six different angles, we don't immediately go out and execute somebody. We go through a very lengthy process of trials and things like that because we want to make

sure that everybody has that due process. Even if we know that they are guilty and it's pretty foregone conclusion, we still go through the exercise. Everybody deserves that. Criminals deserve it, people who have violated the law coming here as illegals deserve it because you and I deserve it. And if we don't give them the God given rights that they possess as human beings, those God given rights will be taken away from us. By a government that

doesn't respect humanity. And that's what we see in this government. They don't respect law because they don't respect humanity. They treat everybody that they disagree with. They treat somebody if they're from Venezuela or if they have immigrated here. They treat everybody that is not someone that is part of their club, part of their tribe. Everyone is treated with contempt. This will have such a big problem with Warpete and

a church that he attends. Somebody needs to talk to that guy needs to be some discipline about that, because it's about us being human beings. Here again, the story that we showed earlier, the height of close combat weaponry is on this woman's doorstep. Federal agents are using the instruments of war, fine tuned and perfected for killing at

short range. And again the weapons of defense abroad, James Madison said, are always always used as instruments of tyranny at home, always, and we're seeing it again now so again, seven or eight dangerous Barney five clowns wind up on our doorstep, all of them like they are in battle

in a rock or Afghanistan. And actually this is an article written by Thomas gibbons Neff, who was deployed twice to Afghanistan as a marine, said images of immigration crackdown in Minneapolis across the US have been likened to those in the country's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Helmets, camouflage, Why do you need camouflage in an American city? Somebody explained that to me, it only makes you stand out if you got a bunch of white suburban houses or something. Right, So, helmets, camouflage,

and tactical gear all look straight from the battlefield. Nowhere is that more important than that single photo that was in that article taken on January eleventh by the Associated Press, A line of federal agents on the doorstep of a woman's home, rifles in hand, and probably some of them pointing at her. The agent's equipment tells its own story.

Their gear is the physical manifestation of decades of war, fine tuned and perfected for close quarter killing over myriad operations and far away lands, now wielded in broad daylight and American cities. This equipment is often reserved for swat and hostage rescue units, which is why I say, you know you look at something like a hostage rescue unit. LN Horyucci, the FBI sniper who was part of the

hostage rescue unit. What do you do? He shot Vicky Weaver right between the eyes as she was holding a baby, Randy Weaver's wife. That was point blank for somebody who was a sniper. He was so close. There was no excuse for that. What did our government do?

Says Reason federal officials suggesting that carrying a firearm is inherently threatening and an invitation to police violence. I can

I say this is nothing new. This has always been the position of New York City Democrat Donald Trump. He has never appreciated firearms. I think, just like Scott Bessont went on with Jonathan Carl the other day. I think neither one of the two, neither of them had ever touched a gun. It's like, have you been you know? He asked Jonathan Carl the reporter. Bessont asked him, have you ever been to a protest and carrying a gun? And the other guy's oh, I've never even been to

a protest. And of course, you know, Bessant always protected with an army of private bodyguards who are armed to the teeth. They have no appreciation of what self defense is for the rest of the people. And so federal officials are describing this as a domestic terrorist. I would be assassin who wanted to do maximum damage and to

massacre law enforcement. Those are quotes. The only evidence to support these characterizations is the fact that he was carrying a concealed handgun, which he was legally allowed to do. As I said before, he complied with a lot of laws that I don't think are constitutional. I don't when we look at these carry things. I mean, I don't carry a gun. If I were to go through New Jersey or New York or something like that, I would

never take a gun with me going up there. So I don't go up there, stay away from those places, although videos of the incident show pretty never drew the weapon, let alone threaten the agents with it. Several officials portrayed his exercise the constitutional right to keeping bear arms as inherently suspicious. These officials are Trump cons people who do not know or appreciate the rule of law or constitutional

rights protected rights. So the Homeland Security said on Saturday that he approached US Border patrol officers with the nine millimeter or semi automatical hand gun, Therefore he is a terrorist, right. They neglected to mention that the agents didn't see the holstered gun until after they tackled him, and the officers attempted to disarm him, but the armed suspect violently resisted, said DHS, omitting the fact that the agent had removed

the gun by the time the shooting started. And even worse, if you look at the guy who does some of the initial shooting, pulls out his gun first right, pointing it at his back. He's watching the gun being taken away. So there's no excuse for any of this stuff. They're trying to come up and with an excuse and pinning it on the SIG that's been reported to accidentally misfire, and of course that is a real thing that has happened. That's not what happened here. And he's carried this, says

his wife, for several years. He's been carrying this gun, and he's been in fights with the police carrying guns with this. As we saw with the recently surfaced yesterday BBC clip, you could see they had the gun stuck in his waistband behind him and it didn't go off then either, Cash Battel what an amazing I would say, disappointment for the Maga people. He's got to be I never thought they would be that good in this position,

but they thought it was going to be great. Look at this, We've got cash Hotel, we got Dan Bongino. Well Bongino's out of this now. But Cash matel claimed that his possession of a handgun was illegal. Quote, you cannot bring a firearm loaded with multiple magazines to any sort of a protest that you want. He said, you don't have a right to break the law. Well, it's not breaking the law, and you do have a right

to carry a firearm for your protection. And as I said before hundreds of people the Alamo protests that were armed, openly carrying, because the purpose of the protest was to talk about changing the carry laws in Texas to make them align more with the Constitution. So everybody there except for those of us who are shooting cameras, everybody else

was carrying rifles. So again, this guy, Bill Esselee, the first Assistant US Attorney for the Central District of California, I've talked about this yesterday, said if you approach law enforcement with a gun, there's a high likelihood they'll be legally justified in shooting. You don't do it. And that's the point at which Gun Owners of America and now even the National Rifle Association has jumped in said they

call the comments dangerous and wrong. So their statement was not nearly as strong as Gun Owners of America, but at least they did finally say something. Trump did not explicitly say that he invited his own death by carrying a gun, but he did portray that conduct as troubling. He said, I don't like it when somebody goes into a protest and he's got a very powerful, fully loaded gun with two magazines. Well, again, he's been carrying that for quite some time. He went through all of the

unconstitutional legal loopholes that they put out there. I would call him entrapments, but he did all that stuff. So Trump is validly committed to quote unquote protecting Second Amendment rights, said his Justice Apartment. How can anybody believe that if you believe that you're not paying attention, He's done more to set precedents of gun control than any other Republican president in my life, not even close. So these Trump

cons are basically just Democrat wolves in conservative clothing. Getting back to what can we really do about this? And I mentioned this beginning of the program. Joe Scarborough said he was struck that he would agree with Sean Hendy on ice. He said, what Sean Handy is saying, most Americans believe that. And Joe Scarbo says, because remember before he got on with Mika Brazinski, he used to be a Republican And he said, back in the nineties, I

was saying the same thing. So what is it that Sean Hennedy said, Well, he said these are people that he goes when they're going in and rating places like home depot. Sean Handy said a responsible program should come forward. He said raids on stores are not a good idea, he said. Undocumented immigrants working there are not the immediate problem. That's absolutely right. They're not the typically the rapists and

so forth and so on. If you want to go after rapists once you get the Epstein list, Department of Justice put ice on the so me saying suggest that a program could be to offer to those who come forward, people who have come here illegal and again they violate the law, but it's a misdemeanor. Come forward, tell us

that you're here. We'll pay your way home, we'll pay for you to fly back home, and then you can apply to get back into the country legally, and we'll give that consideration the fact that you want to try to get legal again. Sean Handy said, I think that'd be a much more responsible, reasonable way to deal with this problem. And again I would say no welfare, no

welfare magnet, even for legal immigrants. If you want to come to this country, show that you can support yourself, that you have the ability to support your family as well, that you want to be an American, not because you want free stuff, but because you want freedom.

stop that. Scarborough played back the clip of Sean Hannity and he said, yeah, this is what I've championed all along since i was a Republican congressman. He said, it struck me because I had that position when I was a congressman back in nineteen ninety four, and I'm struck that the administration didn't begin with that. How about voluntary will help you to voluntarily deport yourself, and then let's cut the welfare magnet and then let's take a look

at the people who are coming in. No, they don't start with that. Instead, they want this policy of confrontation. They deliberately want conflict. That's what's going on here. And their agenda doesn't have anything to do with protecting the borders. Their agenda is to take down all of the boundaries of law. Understand that that's the real agenda, said most Americans believe that if you're here illegally, you should be deported. As Sean Hannity said, people have been talking about this

for years. Give people money to give back home. Then have these people are reapplied to come back to America. You get in line with all people from all over the world that are applying and try to do this the correct way. But if you've been in America for a long time, if you've been a law abiding citizen, not citizens, but if you've been law abiding, if you've been and if you're an asylum seeker, certainly, if you've had children that are here that have served in the military,

you should be at the front of the line. But you know, leave the country and come back in, We'll put you at the front of the line for some of those considerations. He said, Well, it's very unfortunate for this country, and the politically unfortunate for the administration and four Republicans is that it's taken them this long to express this publicly in the face of some violent tactics over the past six to nine months. I just want to repeat this because I don't think I know Republicans

watch this, and I don't think they listen. Sometimes to what I'm saying. No, they don't. Who watches Joe Scarborough anymore? Only his tribe, But they go, well, oh Joe's a lefty, so I'm not gonna watch this, I said. But I've been saying this from the very beginning. So now is a good thing that Sean Hennerity is saying this. So looking at this from the outside, the Mirror in the UK says there's four areas where Trump has got a real problem and he is being heckled, ridiculed and embarrassed

in these four different areas. They said, Trump's second term is rapidly unraveling, with a sense spreading beyond his critics to senior Republicans and furious MAGA voters, and he is

in many cases being heckled by his own supporters. And this just happened on Tuesday night in Iowa, a place that has been a stronghold for Trump and for the Trump cons, his own supporters angry over rising prices, over broken economic promises, over the killing of US citizens by his immigration goon squads, and also over the Epstein stuff which hangs over everything.

keep this concealed. Look at how much political capital they have expended to keep this concealed. And so you have to ask yourself when he's gotten this much criticism for keeping the Epstein information and protecting these predators that were part of this club that he was a part of, when he works so hard for that takes so much criticism for it, got to ask yourself how much more

is in there? How much it's got to be much worse than the bad criticism that he's getting right now if that were to be a public And so the four areas he's talking about here, of course, are the Ice shootings and the Maga revolt, especially because of the anti Second Amendment position that we could early see now is the core belief of these Trump cons people like Trump at their core, people like Trump this sorrow Sky,

Scott Bessett that he made secretary of the Treasury. These people at their core are no different from Chuck Schumer when it comes to the Second Amendment, no different whatsoever. They despise and fear people who have guns if they're

not under their command. So again, the people like Pee Wee German, Steven Miller, they point out, these people immediately cast Pretty as a violent threat, smearing him in ways that have since been contradicted by video evidence and eyewitness accounts, and efforts to justify the killing by absurd lies and character assassination, which is what we always see. They really discredited themselves. And then the Greenland gambit, big talk and little return. I would say, zero return. You know, it's

kind of interesting. There was a movie that came out. I looked at it and I kind of remembered it from my childhood, how disappointed I was in the Peter Sellers movie. And I saw the pictures of it, and so these guys in armor and mad spears and bows and ears, and I thought it's gonna be pretty good. You know, it's like four years old. But it was really it was way over my head. The mouth the mouse that right, And basically I'll play the short little trailer for you to give you the idea of it.

It's a small country that declares war with America. We've kind of reversed this whole thing with the Trump administration. We've gone from the mouse that roared Trump has become the mouth that roared. Why is the smallest country on earth declaring war against the United States.

was laughed off from Copenhagen to Brussels. Vague talk of strategic interests of produced precisely nothing beyond diplomatic eye rolling and quiet embarrassment. For Washington, the episode became a neat reflection of deeper doubts about Trump's grasp of foreign policy. The White House build this as toughsionary deal making, looking instead like amateur geopolitics, wildly out of step with reality.

Allies reacted with cool disdain, while polls at home showed scant public support, underlining how detached the idea was from the concerns of most Americans, and I would say, and how detached from reality. It was worse still, the Greenland side show strained already brittle relations with NATO partners in

European governments, fueling fresh rose and diplomatic friction. Instead of producing strength, Trump weakened America's standing, turning a supposed power play into another self inflicted wound on the world stage. It's difficult to tell the difference between and the Trump administration, between geopolitics and ego politics. And it's just by moving that G that stands for Greenland anyway. Economic gripes then as we see tariffs, inflation continuing and Trump lying to

your face about the prices that you're paying everywhere. So again, the economy is always a big part of it. But then the Epstein files, as they point out in this article from The Mirror, the single biggest threat, and I agree with that. I mean, the Royal family is a lot more experienced in terms of dealing with pr issues and optics whatever. You know, your opinion of them is, they've had a lot of experience and they needed that kind of experience because of the way the Royal family is.

But they were quick to do damage control with Prince Andrew. Not so with the Trump administration. I mean they went in exactly the opposite direction. Instead of trying to distance himself from all this and trying to be as transparent as possible, he tried to be as opaque and hidden again with the blatant, obvious lies. Oh it's all a hoax type of stuff. So one motive looms over Trump's presidency.

Distraction critics argue the rolling crises, the ice crackdowns, of foreign policy stunts, and the culture war flare ups are self created for a single reason to drag attention away from the overdue release of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Well, it's not the single reason. I mean that is his mode of operation always because he comes from a professional wrestling background, those documents pose the greatest threat to Trump.

Despite bipartisan legislation mandating disclosures, administration has been accused of delaying and obstructing the process, with less than one percent released so far, a drip feed that is only fueled claims of a cover up. At stake are more than a million files and renewed scrutiny of Trump's friendship Jeffrey Epstein. Again, when you look at all that this has cost him, and he thinks that it's worth it to pay that price. You got to imagine just how damaging the truth would

be when it comes out. Trump's presence is not imploding in a single dramatic moment. It is rotting in plain sight. The coalition that carried him to power is splintering. His cracks are widened by infighting over ice, brutality, foreign policy blunders, a grinding cost of living crisis, and the toxic shadow of the Epstein files. What once passed for control now looks like chaos, colliding from every direction. This is no

longer a presidency that is shaping events. It is one that is lurching from crisis to crisis, forever on the back foot. The man who promised strength and dominance is reduced to damage limitation, frantically trying to smother backlash, to shore up shrinking base and spin away from scandal. With a November midterms closing in, Trump's grip on power looks weaker by the day, and the consequences of failure have never been clear. I think it is going to be

a big sea change. As a matter of fact, this article from Futurism says, even Palenteer staff are now disgusted with ICE. They're writing, this is an internal meeting that

they had and people took notes of it. And as people criticize Pallenteer's role in what was happening with ICE, you got to look at this and say, did they not do due diligence before they signed on to this company? Did they not know what this company was really about. One of the people said, in my opinion, Ice are the bad guys, and we're helping them.

what they see happening here. The brutal crackdown. After federal agents shot and killed Alex Petti on Saturday, some Palenteer employees began openly questioning the work the company was doing with Homeland Security. One. In my opinion, I s are the bad guys, and I'm not proud of the company. I enjoy working for so much.

for Palenteer. Would anybody else want to hire somebody like that? I don't know. So we needed to have an understanding of our involvement here, said another one. The protests are raised in a company wide slack channel that was dedicated to discussing news items. Many of the posts that were either critical of ICE or question Polentteer's involvement with the agency received dozens of up votes in the form of the emojis so wired is the one that broke the story.

They underscored how the sentiment was far from being fringe and that the unrest was out in the open. Some employees even wondered if pollnteer could help put an end to what they were reading about in the news. Again, they don't have any idea of who they're working for. This is just the tip, you know, This ICE thing is just the tip of the iceberg, isn't it. Can polunteer put any pressure on ICE at all? Wrote one employee.

I read stories of folks rounded up who were seeking asylum with no order to leave the country, no criminal record, and consistently checking in with authorities, literally no reason to be rounded up like this. Surely we aren't helping them do that.

for each person that included where they live. Palateer was also awarded a thirty million dollar contract to build ICE and Immigration to provide near real time visibility on people self deporting from the country, and also worked on updating the agency's database so it can be complete target analysis of known populations. So again we have this situation where I noticed how long it took them to get to the Somali fraud. Right, this is known going back to

twenty eighteen. We were doing reports about this stuff, and yet that wasn't the first place that the Trump administration went, but now it is their number one priority after there was a report about it. But they knew about it, just like Waltz knew about it, just like Immer, the number three Republican in the House, all knew about it.

But they didn't do anything about that crime. And the thing that you would do about that crime doesn't have anything to do with going door to door picking up people. That is a white collar crime investigation type of thing. Eventually there would be a rest, but they're not anywhere

close to that point yet. In response to the protests on slack, Volunteer's Civil Liberties team updated its internal wiki with a breakdown on it's work with ICE, arguing that the technology is making a difference and mitigating risks while enabling targeted outcomes. And so people are saying, well, wait

a minute. You know, we heard that they're making this database, and we had this situation where and we've showing you the video of it, the guy goes up to somebody who's filming them and says, you're now in the database right as a terrorist? They said, are we doing that? Hunter with the bad guy is putting in this database that's tracking people who are protesting what we don't have a problem with. And so that is the reality of where this is. And again they have no idea what

is going on with it. There was an interesting back and forth with a Trump the General Council former General Council from the first Trump administration for Homeland security. He went on with Jake Tapper his name is Chad Mozelle, and he starts making all of these accusations about in his characterizations, these mischaracterizations and lies, and I thought it was a great comeback from of all people, fake Jake Tapper, he's done a couple of these that are good, and

he says, wait a minute. You do realize after you say that, you do realize that there's video out there that shows that everything that you were saying is a lie. And finally it's time that somebody said that, and it was Jake Tapper who said it. You do realize that there's multiple videos of this that show that everything that you said is a lie. And that's kind of where we are at this point in time with these guys.

So the final thing is that first video that came out where the woman was, you know, what the f were you doing? And everything? She said? She went on with Anderson Cooper and she said, uh, yeah, I really regret that I use the F word so much, but she go, I was just so angry. I couldn't couldn't control it. And she said the thing that made her angry about it, which she said, she said, I remember

the feeling inside my body. I remember, of course I wish I wasn't saying that word so often, but at the same time, that's how angry I was, and like, I don't know if anger is the right word to use. She said that I was mortified the way I was feeling and helpless. I couldn't believe what I was seeing.

I knew he was gone because I watched it. And then they come over to try to perform some type of medical aid by ripping the clothes open with scissors and then maneuvering his body around like a rag doll, only to discover that it could be because they wanted to count the bullet wounds to see how many they got, like he's a deer. And so she points that out. And as a matter of fact, the physician, who was a pediatrician, he was not one of the protesters. He

heard all this commotion everything. He was watching from his window in a nearby apartment building, and he when he saw that he saw the shooting, then he ran down and downstairs and out of the building. And he goes as ever says, I'm a physician. They wouldn't let him come because, well, where's your identity papers?

But he said, we had to leave the area and go the others, you know, go somewhere else because there was so much tear gas that was getting into his apartment building there. What were we going to say? Last?

I don't know what that second A stands for. We're gonna take a quick break. We'll be right back.

He came out and said he thought it was all fake. This is this is like Sean Hannity and Joe Scarborough agreeing on something, and so I think it does look very very fake. Lance was the first one to see this, and he said, say, this is one of the those ridiculous things I've ever seen you got a guy in the audience who is kind of a bit dodgy looking and everything, and the camera is focusing in on him. It looks like she glances in his direction a couple

of times and then kind of gives a knot. He jumps up and he sprays her with something, and everybody around her is like freaking out, you know, thinking that it's some kind of a hasard. This material they brought in the hazmat people. They discovered that it was apple cider vinegar. One of the people that was there with her said it was horrible. I went outside and I had to throw up. I don't know, it's like, have you ever had that response to the apple cider vinegar?

It's not that bad, but anyway, I had this. This is a picture that somebody says. We were laughing about it. We said, yeah, she should have jumped up and said fight, fight, fight. Well, one person basically put a banana in her hand as she is even had the people around her like secret Service agents hustling her off, and you see one person with a spray bottle spring her and the smally flag in the background. So I thought, well, it's just drop

this in the gruk and animate it. Yeah, there we go, fight fight, fight, that's it.

to the podium and tries to continue her speech. And then the people that weren't in on it are all saying, no, no, you gotta go get this checked out. You might have been sprayed with anything. You don't know what happened, and you know, any logical thing if this was it could have been acid for all they know. So she's like, no, no, that's what he wants. I gotta finish my speech.

isn't it theater from both sides? And here we are stuck in the middle of these people get crazier and crazier every day. Well, that's it for our show today. We have a couple of very interesting interviews. I think you're going to really enjoy tomorrow. So it'll be live. It'll be the first time we've aired these interviews. We recorded them this week and so tune in tomorrow. You'll be able to comment with each other. And it is a new program that'll be aired tomorrow, although it will

be pre recorded interviews. Thank you for joining us the common man. They created common Core, dumbed down our children. They created common past, track and control us. They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, not sophisticated, ordinary, But each of us has worth and dignity. Create it in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away.

Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidknightshow dot com