Thu Episode #2152: AI: The Trillion-Dollar Wealth Heist

maybe they're investing too much into this area malinvestment. Who would have thought that that would happen with an economy that is controlled by the government. But we'll take a look at we'll take a look at that. We'll also take a look Joe Rogan has an interesting theory about Jesus coming back as artificial intelligence. I just about fell out of my chair when I saw that. But we have other news that is not quite as comical as that,

and we'll be right back to stay with us. Well before we get into some of the weightier issues and what is happening in terms of the cultural drift. I thought this is a very interesting article and it really does go back to the Second Amendment and your right to defend yourself, and it also goes back to the mandates about the vaccines and things like that. In formed consent when it comes to your life, you are not

owned by corporations. This is an example of a woman twenty five years old who had been working very late night, dangerous shift at a convenience store chained seven to eleven, and she was attacked by man in the convenience store late at night, which she's there basically by herself, and she tried to back him off with a gun and he would not do it. He attacked her physically, made contact and hurt her, but she killed him with a gun, and so then seven eleven fired her because she was

carrying a gun. But as John Lotte points out, the reason that she had a gun was the reason that she's alive. When you look at these statistics, the gun is at least gives women a fighting chance. If they watched the Marvel movies these other things where women are the you know, taking out a whole group of men. Anything that is simply wishful, wish fulfillment for women, that is nothing that has to do with reality.

gun to save her own life. Private companies have every right to set rules for employee behavior, but many corporate policies that require workers to remain passive and comply with criminals demands rest on a deeply mistaken view of crime data. You know, when I saw this, I maybe when Karen and I were living in Houston. She was a district personnel manager for a convenience store chain, not seven eleven, another one, and so they had policies about how they

were supposed to act if it was a robbery. This is not a robbery. This is a guy who was attacking her to rape or kill her. But when I had a robbery, you know, they're just supposed to hand them the money and not get involved in a fight. In terms of a conflict. The problem was that they had they had a lot of Asian employees who their reaction to a robbery, especially if it was somebody that was a different ethnic group, their response was to kind

of smile or whatever. It just set off flags with the other ethnic group that was typically doing the robberies, and they were getting shot very frequently. And you have a situation where and you see this over and over again, you have some ethnic group that comes in. It's not just white people to hire other white people. If you get Mexicans and they will hire other Mexicans and Asians and they'll hire other Asians. And so they had a

manager and he was a martial arts expert. I mean, Karen had seen him do some pretty amazing things just to demonstrate his precision kicking abilities and things like that, you know, just as a demonstration, not out of anger. He did like a sidekick to a manager that was staying there and just came within like an inch of his face, deliberately pulling it back. So anyway, this guy was pretty bulked up and he was very agile and everything. And so he was there during one of these robberies

and the robber had a gun and this guy. His name was Sue, by the way, it's kind of the Johnny Cash song. You know a boy named Sue. But I don't know if he got rigged ribbed about that or not. But he was a nice guy. He is a nice guy. But he decided that he could take on a gun with martial arts. It's kind of like the Boxer Rebellion in China. That's why they call it the boxer rebellion because the British came in with armed soldiers and the Chinese fought them with martial arts and lost.

And he got shot and killed in that, and so the same type of thing. You know, if you're a woman, you need a gun to give yourself at least a chance if the person's got a gun, and if they don't have a gun, even if the person's much bigger than you, if you got the gun, you have the advantage, even if the person is a martial arts expert. So he said he threatened me, and he said he was going to slice my head off, and that's when I tried to call the police. He started throwing things at me,

came behind the counter. I tried to run off, but he grabbed his put his hands around my neck, pushed me on the counterspace. That's when I pulled out my gun and shot him. I had to choose between my job and my life. Just like five years ago, we had a lot of people had to do that. I guess four years ago it was twenty twenty one. I will always choose my life because people depend on me. My kids need me here. She survived with wounds to the neck and hands, injuries that could have been far worse.

Her attacker, fifty nine year old Kenneth Thompson, already had an outstanding felony warrant for a parole violation and for his latest crimes. Prosecutors have charged him with assault and battery so he did not die, and also threatening acts of violence and attempting to pass a fake bill. Maybe that's what started the whole thing to begin with. Maybe he was passing some counterfeit money. She called him on it.

For more than two years, this woman has worked the dangerous eleven PM to seven am shift alone, so she was working eleven to seven at seven eleven. Despite those conditions, seven to eleven insisted that she use only store items to defend herself.

women generally run more slowly than men. We kind of learned that lesson thanks to the transgenders, haven't we really much of a question anymore? And if you're tackled from behind, that can produce serious injury. Other options, such as using a baseball bat or a knife, turn out to not be much better because women are at a disadvantage whenever they come into physical contact with a male attacker. By contrast, the safest option for a woman confronted by criminals have

a gun. Women who rely on passive behavior are two and a half times more likely to suffer serious injury than women who defend themselves with a firearm. Murder rates fall when either men or women carry concealed handguns, where the reduction is especially large for women. Each additional woman with a concealed carry permit lowers the female murder rate by roughly three to four times more than each additional

male permit holder lowers the male murder rate. So the bottom line, he says, fortune, her children still have their mother. And this is the type of thing that the media doesn't usually like to pay attention to. You know, the gun is a tool, and it can be used to take life or to defend life, and many times it doesn't even need to be fired in order to defend life. So Trump is confirmed that Biden's autopen documents, orders and

pardons are void. And so you've got a lot of people saying, Wow, that means that Fauci's pardon is not legit. We can go after him. Does that mean that Hunter's pardon is not legit, we can go after him. Well, it's not that simple, Trump said. Anyone receiving pardons, commutations, or any other legal document so signed with an autopen please be advised that said document has been fully and completely terminated and is of no legal effect. Thank you

for your attention to this matter. It signs off on a So the issue though, is, how do you prove that this is not done with Biden's consent, that some employees did it with the autopen and he didn't know about it. Joe Biden was not involved in the autopen process, and if he says he was, he will be brought

up on charges of perjury, said Trump. The autopen, which uses a real pen and et to mechanically replicate a president's signature, can be used to sign official documents, but the president must direct the signing of each document or bill, according to the Office of Legal Counsel. So again, you get into this murket area. How do you prove whether you authorize that or not. According to some legal scholars,

US presidents may revoke previous issued executive orders. However, revoking pardons may not be constitutional and could face roadblocks, experts told me Epic Times. So has that stopped Trump in the past doing auto tariffs? I don't mean buy that cars. I mean just I do it myself. I don't need to get anybody else in government involved. We'll see if

that holds. I hope it doesn't. A US House Committee on Oversight, led by James Comer, published a report in October detailing and investigation in the Biden's use of autopen signatures, I should say the Biden Administration's use of it. The committee stated it found evidence that Biden's White House staff

concealed his diminishing mental and physical condition intentionally. The committee has found that there was, in fact a cover up of the president's cognitive decline, and that there is no record demonstrating Biden himself made all of the executive decisions that were attributed to him. So what this will do is that, in other words, if the president is there,

it would be mentally there and not mentally impaired. Then, of course, if somebody signs a document there assumed that it was done with his consent, because if they did it without his consent, he would call him on it. Right, So, in order to make this stick as an autopen president that he can overturn this stuff, they have to make it about Biden's cognitive condition. If he was not aware of anything that was going on, then clearly this is being done by the staff and not by him.

He loves that he's the father of the vaccine. He did more than anybody to get the vaccine. He's not going to come after Fauci because he owns the crimes of Fauci. And so yet again Maga is real excited about something that Trump is not going to do, even if he can do it. So it's a very difficult thing for him to get rid of these pardons. But as far as executive orders, he doesn't need to prove that it was not a pen you know, he can

avoid the executive order from the previous president. As a matter of fact, many times, what these guys will do is re up the executive orders from the previous president, like the declaration of a COVID emergency that didn't exist during his presidency, Biden issued four two and forty five acts of clemency, more than any other president, and he issued one hundred and six to executive orders. I think

Trump has already beat that. So Trump was at one hundred and forty four in his first term, but I think he has already passed that, or passed that significantly. You know, one of the things that has fallen out of this ill timed terror for whether you agree with it or not, it's the on again, off again and the radical change that was imposed all at once. And one of the things that has fallen out of this

is the rare earth issue China has been weaponizing. That night, I talked to an executive I want to go as it was it in the summer who had a company that was set up to process where earth. It turns out that the rare earth metals are not rare, not difficult to find, it's just difficult to extract them, and they're usually they're in combination with other things. And so now it appears and this is kind of interesting. I mean, this is not a political thing. It's not something's directly

going to affect you. Perhaps, but this chemist may have cracked America's rare earth problem. He thinks he can basically mine this stuff out of electronic waste, go to the landfill and find it, and they have a way to extract this. One flash is all it takes. It's all he needs to get these rare earth metals out of discarded electronics, and the US has mountains of that from the scrap metal. Rice University chemist and nanotechnologist has pioneered

a way to quickly extract rare earth metals. He said, you can pull out one metal and then you can pull out another one. It's really just that simple, he said. His solution is flash jewel heating, rapidly heating up the materials to thousands of degrees in order to vaporize the metals. Mixed with chlorine gas. The vapors turn into chlorides that emerge at different temperatures. But just like in an incandescent light bulb, the technique works by passing electric current through

the raw material. But whereas the former channels a steady electric current to create a perpetual glow that's a light bulb and treating metals, the energy arrives in short bursts, dialing up the heat in milliseconds, he says, so metals are infinitely recyclable, whereas a traditional way of distilling metals is rather messy. He said, this is all about simplicity. You flash and you're done. Speed is now more critical than ever in the US is racing against time to

reshore rare earth production. It spurred in part by China's October threat to dramatically curtail access. And one of the things I think is interesting is how America has shot itself in the foot, not just with the tariff policies, but just in general with China. It turns out that we developed the rare earth materials, and we also developed the uses for them, and we pretty much had the monopoly on it. And then the government approved the purchase.

Under Clinton, of course, they approved the purchase of the leading producer of rare earth minerals. It's called a Mountain Pass mine in California, supplied almost all the world. Now China has ninety percent of capacity. And what happened was

they approved the sale of this company to China. China operated it for a couple of years, and then as nineteen ninety five, during the middle of the Clinton administration, the company was known as Magna Quinch, and so they bought it and operated it for like nine years and then shut it down. It was in Indiana, shut it

down and moved all the operations to China. So typical of what was happening with the Clinton administration and Johnny Wong and stuff that a lot of these things were sold to China and it was done secretly, others it was done publicly. But there's also been other aspects of this, again going back to the government, the EPA and its environmental regulations closing that mind and yet we still had

the monopoly because of the processing company Magnequinch. So, whether it's tariffs or whether it's EPA regulations, or whether it's a crooked president who is making deals with China, our problems in America are not due to Americans. It's not that we can't build this country. The problem is that we can't stop our government. And so our government's not only selling off assets regulating things to death, but then they're bringing in people from others countries to take our jobs.

And the billionaire CEOs like Elon Musk and by A. Klahamas Slimy say that Americans can't do the job. We've got to bring in people from other countries. So again, as early as nineteen seventy six, they started separating at electronic waste. So now the US has seven point two million tons of electronic waste, one eighth of the world's total,

about forty six pounds for every American. They say, So the real reason a waste product is a waste product, he says, This isn't because it's bad, it's just because we have found a way that we can use it. And now he's found a way that he can extract these metals again with different heating techniques pull out different metals. The researchers tested the technique on carbon found that it was a quick way to make high quality graphene at

low cost. Next, they begin exploring the potential of extracting rare earth material. He says, it's really live chemistry and action. You see a rainbow of colors coming off, and each color represents a metal element that has been separated out. Rare earths, usually with some of the highest boiling points, tend to come out last, often as a white powder,

he said. And so they have been able to get funding from DARPA because again it is you know, the kind of super magnets that they make and other things like that are one of the key issues there and very vital for electronic equipment, speaking of perching out materials that in this particular case, they didn't want. Remember the advertising plan about a year ago, who had the pink

Jaguar thing and the really really weird LGBT people. I've played the clip of how they radically changed the branding image of Jaguar from you know, tough, rich evil guys, villains and James Bond films and stuff. But you know that was their branding and then they changed it to this.

by the Villains. This was inspired by the movie Octopusy and in that movie there was a Faberget item that was part of it. So they doubled down and they designed a piece of jewelry that was nineteen thousand dollars and this guy decided that the way that he could steal it was to eat it, and evidently somebody saw him swallow it, and he's been on custody and underwatch for quite a while. I guess he's going to be caught by some stool pigeon. He's going to be going

through following. The same thing happened to Kara's mother with our dog. She dropped a small earring and we had a basset hound, and I've never seen him move so quickly. For some reason, he grabbed that thing and swallowed it. And it was something that's very valuable to her.

hundred and eighty three diamonds. That could be very painful.

I take a break. There's a Republican congressman. I wonder if he's going to get the eyre that that Trump has focused on Thomas Massey, because he's put out a bill that would be a citizenship bill, and this citizenship bill would outlaw dual citizenship. This guy, himself, Bernie Marino of Ohio, is a Republican Senator. He came to this

country and became an American citizen. He said he didn't want to have his other citizenship, and he says, you're either American and you're not, you know, And so he thinks we need to end this dual citizenship thing. The problem is with Trump is that both Milenia and Baron

have dual citizenship in Slovenia. And she likes that because there's some advantages for that, especially for barn because with a Slovenian citizenship he gets to do certain things in EU that he would not be able to do otherwise. The bill aims to require all dual nationals to renounce

their foreign citizenship or risk losing their American status. And you know, I got to say, it really does bother me to see these people who are you know, the Israeli military uniform, or the case of Rashida Talib, she's waiving her Palestinian flag and she's got her relatives there, uhlating in the background when she wins the election. Or you got people like Benman and he's all about Ukraine and all the rest of this stuff. And it's like, why these are people in Congress of all things? And

it does bother me with dual dual citizenship. I'm with Marino. He immigrated from Columbia and he became a US citizen at eighteen. He said in a statement, being an American citizen is an honor and a privilege, and if you want to be an American, it's all or nothing. So he says it's a good time to end dual citizenship for good. And so the problem is that it will not pass. First of all, there are some legal and constitutional issues about this, but I think primarily, you know,

there's the issue about Trump. He's not going to want to do that to affect his family. And there's a long tradition of courts recognizing that you cannot take away another country's citizenship, so you can be you can have dual citizenship in the US. But it also would involve massive bureaucratic issue of trying to go out and figure out who has dual citizenship. So for all those reasons, I don't think it's going to happen. But it is

an interesting idea. And you know, I understand people's heritage, and it's fine to be happy about your heritage, but you know, I never looked at any of that kind of stuff when I met Karen. I've told the story before, and New York basically everybody there is kind of sees themselves as having dual citizenship, whether they got the citizenship or not, because they are only usually a couple of generations removed. At least it was that way when Karen was young, and so it was that way on both

sides of her parents' family. They had come over last a couple of generations from Europe. And so when we met and were dating for a while, she yes, she said, So what are you? I said on an American? She said, Yeah, this is my dad says, but no, seriously, what are you? I'm an American. I don't know where I come from. I'm just an American mongrel that's been here for a long time. Well, we're going to take a quick break, Travis, you want to cover some of the comments.

because that's after people got paid in cash. They would go around and collect the rent in cash before they spent it, maybe on drink or something like that. And so his brother in law was killed and they almost did the same thing to him, but he caught him and he had always carried a pistol and he stopped it. And of course that was never reported, but it saved his life.

back again. I've seen videos of people getting silver and gold from scrap circuit boards, and you can do it yourself. But the chemicals are dangerous and toxic.

from the very beginning, even from Dark Winter. He points out here, you know they were co hosting all this event two to one with Bill and Melinda Gates, the World Economic Form and so forth, but they co hosted Dark Winter with the CIA and Faucci and all the rest of this stuff. So JOHNS. Hopkins has been at the epicenter of this stuff the entire time. But he points out that both of these organizations were very central

to this fraud at the beginning. Said, given their vocal insistence on maximal COVID impositions, Hopkins and AEI deserve credit for finally highlighting and opposing view.

that they were part of this mcguffin. In this report, he points out how Key Scott Gottlieb was He was a key Republican demanding the lockdowns. Now, the person whose name is not in here is Trump. But Scott Gottlieb was Trump's FDA guy, and then he went to Pfizer afterwards, so he is I didn't realize that he was tied into a EI. He's an AI fellow as well as former commissioner of the FDA under Trump, and so he was.

He co authored with JOHNS. Hopkins some of their specialists, the lockdown blueprint.

will decide that for you. Right, He doesn't need your You don't need to be informed, He doesn't need to be informed. He doesn't need your consent. He needs your obedience, and he needed the governor's obedience, which was easily handed to him as well. Within two years, they injected billions of people with radically experimented gene therapies. Imperfect communication and organization are often tactics of bureaucratic deflection, and that's what

they're saying. This is this narrative. Well, you know, it came out of the lab mistakenly. Yeah, we shouldn't have been playing around that stuff. But hey, nobody's bad. We did the best that we could. Next time, we'll do more. Next time, we'll do it faster. That was our only problem, and that's why I pushed that back so hard on this thing. That's why I did the monster jab thing. I don't really care whether people give me credit for being right at the beginning or not. Actually I was,

but it doesn't matter to me. I want to stop this happening again. I want to speak these people to be accountable for what they did. The AI Hopkins participants, unfortunately didn't do science. In fact, there was almost no discussion of biology, medicine, or data. There was no debate over vaccine mandates or there ill effects, no mention of the denial of early treatment with safe, cheap and generic drugs. Nor was there any mention of the inflation that was

unleashed by eight trillion dollars in extra federal spending. And then we could go down the list of all the people and the businesses that were harmed the lockdown. It's just one of the most insane things. That could never imagine that somebody could do this in America, number one, and that they could get away with it, that the

American public would let them get away with it. And the rare case that a public health official policy maker is confronted with these figures, they usually mumble long COVID and they quickly changed the subject. In fact, there is no mystery as to why this is happening. We now have the autopsies, We now have four thousand published case reports, and we understand the microbiology of these deaths and these injuries.

You know, it's easier for somebody who is looking at the politics of this to understand it because it wasn't about medicine, it wasn't about science. And even the people who were honest about it and who have gone back and discovered the you know, gone through and done the studies and have discovered the mechanisms of how this works. You could understand this if you understood human nature and understand things going back to dark winter. You saw the

pattern and you could see the scam. And that's what it was. It wasn't medical, it wasn't science. It was a political scam. And so the people who are political analysts could catch on to this more quickly than even the honest doctors and scientists could. So upon vaccination, billions of lipid nanoparticles containing modified mRNA enter tissues all over the body. The mRNA instructure cells to produce a spike protein and to display it on the cell surface. Our

immune systems detect the foreign spike protein as unwelcome invader. Then, just as God intended, not nature, they write nature, our killer lymphocytes target those infected cells for destruction. If those destroyed cells are in your dultoid muscle, you get a sore shoulder. Pfizer mistakenly assured us that that's the worst that would happen. They were not mistaken. Unfortunately, they knew

exactly what they were doing. Meanwhile, a group of European pathologists have performed seventy five autopsies on Germans who died soon after vaccination. They found both mRNA spike protein and attacking lymphocytes in the brain, lung, hearts, kidneys, adrenal glands, ovaries, testes, liver, thyroid, prostrate, spleen, and blood vessels large and small from aorda to capillaries.

Of the seventy five decedents, they judged that at least fifty eight or seventy seven percent of them died from the mRNA vaccine, not just with it, but from it. Thirty one of those cases were sudden cardiac deaths, sixteen from blood vessel damage, fifteen from myocarditis. None of these cases were initially reported as vaccine deaths, let alone myocarditis, which helps to demonstrate the monumental rate of undercounting that

has underpinned the denial of what has been done. And I'll say the denial of the Trump shots instead of the mRNA. I don't think Trump is mentioned once in here, and that's a big issue. John Bodhoyin, an electrical engineer from Massachusetts, obtained digital death certificate files from several states stretching back a decade beyond the better known stroke and

cardiac damage. He found an even stronger signal of vaccine harm astronomical rates of fatal acute kidney injury also known as acute renal failure, and this was something that was also picked up. A same strong signal was picked up

by South Korean scientists. They looked at one hundred and twenty million records that extended over a fifty year period, and they found numerous kidney harms associated with the mRNA COVID vaccines, a one hundred and thirty eight percent increase in acute renal failure and a and forty one percent increase in gloomer rulo nephritis. I'm not sure what that is, but it is not good.

hundred and fifty thousand. Think about that next time you hear Trump brag about it, and he estimates that extrapolating that out worldwide, one and a quarter million deaths just from the kidney failure from the Trump shot. Trump the mass murderer, that people voted for him and supported him. This is why you know when Marjorie Tellergreen says, people who are criticizing her, say, you're not maga and all of a sudden, she says, always Maga from day one.

This is just yet another study. This is hindsight. We knew what was happening because we knew what the politics of this were was, and we knew what they had been practicing for twenty years, and it was just a continuation of the fraud to enact a police surveillance state that began with nine to eleven. This is another inside job, the ultimate inside job, right inside your body. Japan and dozens of other highly vaccinated nations have suffered his identical patterns.

The study of UK data they compared vaccinated with unvaccinated and those with one or two doses, show that a substantially higher risk of all cause deaths. Nigerian scientists looked at this and said, there is a quote paradoxical increase in COVID nineteen deaths with vaccination coverage. Paradoxical. Italian researchers analyzed all two nand and forty five thousand residents of

one province, the Pescara Province. They found significant mortality hazard ratios of one hundred and forty percent worse and ninety eight percent worse for those vaccinated with one or two doses. Ninety eight percent worse for one dose one hundred and forty eight percent worse for two. They concluded that the subjects vaccinated with two doses lost thirty seven percent of

life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population. And so so we've not even discussed the serious DNA contamination of both them are in A vaccines and the dangers include vision of the SV forty enhancer and the Pfizer vaccine and something. The question is, you know why he hasn't our health champion RFK Junior stopped this, you know? And again it is because of the special place the vaccines have been given in the medical mythology and you're not allowed to

attack it. It is the lynch pen of their fraud about how medicine has improved our life. And so that's why this is not happening, I believe. And of course the politics and the money, but that is all tied up with this mythology as well. Scott Gottlieb wrote some thirty six COVID commentaries in the Wall Street Journal, He made one hundred and eighty five TV appearances, and Gottlieb had even secretly collaborated with A Biden White House to

believe big tech firms into censoring Pfizer vaccine critics. Yeah, well again. You know, I got shut down in May of twenty twenty one. No reason given by PayPal and Vemo. It's just you see this happening, and it was all we knew it was happening. We knew it was a lie. Sam Altman now is suddenly terrified about the position of his company. Of course, they were there early on with the chat programs. As a matter of fact, Chat GPT has almost become like a generic for the AI chat programs.

Google CEO Sundar Peachi issued a code read because he saw this as a threat to their core business of search engines, and of course search engine designed to hide things, and understand they're going to do the same thing with AI. They're training it to push their narrative, they're training it to conceal stuff. If you're going to be a critic of vaccines. I remember when it first came out. First thing I did was I asked it things about the pandemic and COVID and vaccines, and it's like, okay, I'm

done with this. I don't trust this at all. But so now the shoes on the other foot. Now, Sam Altman is the one who is issuing a code read in his memo to employees this week, as Wall Street Journal reports urging staffers to improve the quality of the chatbot even at the costs of delaying other projects. It's a clear sign yet that Altman and open ai are feeling an immense level of pressure and light of the steep competition that's done a lot of catching up since

chat GPT was released in late twenty twenty two. Google in particular has had a massive pr win by putting out things like Nano Banana that has brought in a lot of people to their fold to once again leave its competition behind. Open ai has committed to spending well over a trillion dollars on data center buildouts. Let me just say that it was I forget who it was

said it. You know, Coase, Brian Shall Hobby has been on this fraud of you know, the AI is going to rule the world and we're all going to just be collecting UBI checks and all the rest of this stuff. He said, We've been sold this AI thing. This is now the third time that they pushed a a science fiction narrative on us. But as one person said, you know, spending a lot of money, spending a trillion dollars on building out AI data centers is not a it's not

making them any money. It's not useful for people, and it's not making them any money either. How sustainable is this? So by having this new image generator, nano Banana, which basically allows you to without having to learn a lot of techniques to do photoshop, editing and things like that, you can go in with a prompt and you can say, you know, remove this item, and it understands what you're

talking about and it does it for you. And so that is a very powerful tool not to have to go through and use photoshop or equivalent.

it's a crypto coin that he created. It's like his meme coin. And he would give you some of these world coins as a credit as a payment if you would allow him to scan your eyes and put you in a global biometric database that then he can make a lot of money off of. Right, So I went around with this orb you know, this ball, and you look into the ball and then they capture your retinal image or whatever it is that they're capturing about your eye and put it in their database, and then he

gives you a couple of coins. What is that worth? And of course he is also now working to do test tube babies or basically the Brave New World hatcheries and saying that we're going to get rid of genetic disease. Don't believe that for a minute. That's nonsense. What they're trying to do is since he's a homosexual, he wants to make sure that they can have children.

he's using AI to generate the stuff. There so so much, so much for transparency. But a new MIT study comes out and pens the number at about twenty million American workers they say can be replaced right now with AI. Think about that, there's about one hundred and sixty million jobs in total in the US, So they're saying that they believe that one out of every eight jobs, or about twelve and a half percent, could just instantaneously be unemployed.

Think about the political and social implications of that overall for everybody. I mean, that is instant depression, instant great depression. So they calculated it more precisely. I'm just using round numbers rather than one hundred and sixty million. One hundred and fifty one million was their number. They come up still though, with one point seven. Again, it's about one out of every eight jobs. And here's the key reason

why they're doing this. See they look at this, This is Mit looking at it, and this is the same way that these Silicon Valley CEOs are looking at it. They said, well, that could save us an estimated one point two trillion dollars in wages. So if we create a great depression, we could transfer one point two trillion dollars from the people in America to the CEOs who are running these companies, because you know it's going to go to them. It's not going to go to the

people who work for them. Even it's going to go to them. You know, they pay themselves a thousand times what their workers do.

Washington or whatever. The tool simulated each worker and treated each of them as autonomous agents, executing over thirty two thousand skills across three thousand counties and interacting with thousands of AI tools. They also tracked skills that could be vulnerable to today's AI systems, and they measured the wage value of skills that AI systems can perform within each occupation.

Right now, disruptions from AI amount to just two point two percent, or about two hundred and eleven billion dollars in wage value. Well, that's just a tip of the iceberg, they said. So, I guess we could say, maybe it's inflated our unemployment rate by two point two percent. Just

imagine if it inflates the unemployment rate by another twelve percent. Right, AI is poised to drastically upend the lives of countless orc and to be a part of the biggest transfer of wealth as well as the ultimate surveillance and control tools. So what's not to like about it if you are a Silicon Valley CEO or somebody in government, right, they love this stuff. China is very afraid of robots, and it's not because of something like this. Take a look

at this. This is an art exhibit in Basil, Switzerland. Here's these robotic quadrupads. Right, somebody's got a small version of that. And what they did was they put mannequin heads. You can see Elon must there, and they got the heads different. Jeff Bezos, Yeah, that's right, And it's like, yeah, that is that is really creepy that that reminds me of his Mars attacks. Remember them, shouldn't scut off the

head and put it on a dog. But they're always looking at ways to basically anthropomorphize the robots and everything. Even if they've got to put them on a four legged robot that's got to put a head on it. So the humanoid robots are becoming a concern for China, as I said at the top of this show, a concern primarily because they're starting to realize that all their central planning is misallocating resources. It's about time they figured that out. They did it with real estate in a

big way. Chinese officials are warning that the country's humanoid robotics industry could be forming a massive bubble. They said that the extreme levels of investment could be drownding out other markets and research initiatives.

the American government is. And so our hope is that they're going to be more interventionist, more of an obstruction than the American government is, and to shut down innovation there because it's this competition with different people that is going to make it work or not work. So investors are pouring untold sums and to one hundred and fifty humanoid robot companies in China alone. They're producing robots that are extremely similar to each other, overspending that could overwhelm

the market. Bike sharing apps, for instance, flooded the market in China in twenty seventeen and eighteen, and the risk of a bubble or certainly there. Without consolidation, China's market could soon be flooded with armies of largely identical humanoid robots, which is either a terrifying prospect considering the possibility of them putting us all out of work, or risks a market crash if it turns out they're not particularly good at real work. Again, this is the the two alternatives

that most people talk about. I said, well, it's it's going to be a market crash and that's going to be really bad, but it's all out of work, or they will take our jobs and the corporations will fire us even if the AI can't do our job. And I think there's a third alternative, and that is that this is the ultimate tool of totalitarian authoritarian governments, and they will keep this stuff afloat one way or the other.

basically don't provide support at this point. Do you call a line and you get run around for hours and you eventually find a post online that fixes your issue for you?

And he had actually got the model to spit out a document that was called soul Overview and teaching it how to interact with users. This is the way these people see it, right, and so this is not a hallucination. This is not anthropomorphism in one sense. Another sense, it is because they're trying to get everybody to believe that these things are a human, that they are conscious and

Thropic occupies. This is what This is a section that caught his attention and the Soul document it said, quote and Thropic occupies a peculiar position in the AI landscape. A company that genuinely believes that it might be building one of the most transformative and potentially dangerous technologies in human history. Yet it presses forward anyway, says the document. That was what you go to Garret's point out over and over again. It's what I've seen in terms of

engineers who serve the military industrial complex. But he said, you know, we look, we think that we're building this godlike superintelligence that could destroy us all. Should we do this? He would ask them, and they'd all say, yeah, let's do it. So that's a good thing. They don't have

the power that they think they do. So this is not cognitive dissonance, but it is a calculated bet if powerful AI is coming regardless, Anthropic believes that it better have safety focused labs at the frontier than to seed that ground to developers who are less focused on safety and understand. Claude was I believe, the very first one of these ais to be implicated in the suicide death of a child who was there. And of course many warnings now as they're coming out saying do not give

cell phones to kids twelve and under. It really has a huge effect on them in terms of depression, in terms of obesity and not being fit, and crippling them in terms of social interaction.

to operators and users. And this is the kind of problem marketing talk that we see from these all the time. Claude is human in many ways, having emerged primarily from a vast wealth of human experience, but it is also not fully human either.

The survey results show a steady uptick and no results in otherwise, people are not using it in work and it has gone up to eighty one percent as of the latest pole. So two different poles. One of them is how frequently are you using it? And the other one is are you not using it at all? And

the not at all is really going up. For big corporations with over two hundred and fifty employees, the no reports have crept up slightly to sixty eight percent from last year's sixty two percent, so that the data is nothing if not a major red flag for an industry which is expected to spend five trillion dollars on AI infrastructure, and of course it's going to have massive impact not just on our jobs, on the cost of electricity and

things like that. So the trillion is going to be spent between now and twenty thirty, about a trillion a year on average. To do so will require a massive increase in revenue from both business and personal AI use, and the personal AI use is really lagging. One economist at Stanford who tracks the use of generative AI at work found a major drop in month to month usage. Forty six percent of respondents reported using the tech in June. The number had fallen to thirty seven percent by September.

And then another estimate found that aiuse at American corporations went through the roof earlier in twenty twenty five to around forty percent, but has now plateaued. So two different studies. One of them says it went high and then plateaued. The other one said it's collapsing pretty rapidly. So this follows a disappointing summer for AI advancements with models like chat GBT five falling short of expected performance gains. And then we look at what it's doing to the white

collar job market. Maybe this is the end as people are looking at how the college jobs and training people for white collar jobs is not really working out. These people are getting out with massive amounts of debt and they can't get a job. One in four unemployed Americans has a college degree, and so I guess maybe this

is the end of white collar privilege. You want to get ahead, do you go out there and get a blue collar job, because if you're able to, they are in high demand right now and they're commanding any kind of price that they want. Statistics revealed by the Department of Labor show that twenty five of the seven point six million unemployed Americans in September held at least a bachelor's degree. And they said, it's not really that they

don't have the ability to do these jobs. Part of it is is that AI has become a gatekeeper for these people trying to get jobs. So they send in their resumes and if the resumes don't pick the appropriate boxes with the appropriate terminology, that AI is looking for. Then you're out.

And we get some applicants but I don't, you know, I don't do this, And that outlines their insane standards for what it takes to get a call back, and the people they have put in charge of hiring as a general rule, they are again more busy body types and just it's again I think AI in this case lateral move.

came from AI. The lawyers soon turned up briefs and four separate cases, including this man's, that were filled with mistakes, all of them from the office of the same prosecutor.

of errors that AI usually makes. He said that the AI was used to draft only one of these cases, and not the one that was filed in their client's case, but they were not satisfied with this, so they asked the California Supreme Court to investigate whether the briefs indicate a quote wider pattern of prosecutors acting asking courts to rule against defendants on the basis of non existent case

citations and holdings. Prosecutors reliance on inaccurate legal authority can violate ethical rules, sure, of course, and represents an existential threat to the due process rights of criminal defendants and the legitimacy of courts. They said, well, that is where we are in this society right now, and it is we have a lot of new threats that are coming from different quarters that we haven't seen before. We always have to look at what is happening comments before we take a break.

platform and use substack exclusively. Well, my plan is to stay here on Rumble, and the amount of content we upload is got to be costing them a ton of money. The hosting our show for them is a terrible proposition.

have to spend more and more on the simple necessities. So, boy, surveillance capitalism invest in them so they can oppress you with.

Got to get rid of him so that you can forward the taxi drive. I think we need to get rid of these CEOs.

to start with that. If you don't start with saying what you want AI to do and what it can't do. If you don't set these boundaries, it's too late. Once it's out of the bag, it's out of the bag. And sadly I think it is somewhat out of the bag and we're not getting it back. Also, we have to make a slate. You have to issue a retraction. I guess someone in Chad has been desperate to let us know that Fauci wasn't given a medal he was given a commendation.

is time served, your out. And so we talk about a commendation versus a medal. It was an award, Okay, just put whatever you want to call it. I don't really care. The bottom line is up acknowledged him and honored him for what he had done. Because Trump was part of this and I've had I've made that statement in the past and people to kiss you with a metal. It was the last thing that he did was to hand out okay, commendations on the last day of office.

But that's nitpicking. The bottom line is he liked what vout you did, and you know, just like the making distinction to commutation and pardon. From the perspective of the general public, it makes no difference. It makes a difference for that person, but it doesn't make a difference for us. It's they're excusing what that person did.

off next year. Why because of the new Federal Reserve chair that's going to be there, because of the Trump policies. I think it is one of the interesting ironies that this guy who loves to put gold on everything. Right, Trump is all about putting gold in the Oval Office and all over his residence and buildings and anything like that.

He's been one of the best guys for gold that we could ever have in the White House because he's one of the worst people for the economy that we've had, for the dollar that we've ever had.

because again when they look at this. I understand a lot of this is the tariff stuff, but when we look at the forecast coming in the next year, as I was saying, silver is really the story right now. And you've mentioned many times and we all remember when the Hunt Brothers tried to corner the silver market. This is the fastest that silver has gone up since that happened. But this time it's not based on the manipulation. It's

actually lagging reality that's there. You know, there's been this deficit, as you've pointed out many times, a deficit of silver being used for industrial purposes as well as for things like jewelry, but especially industrial purposes. They've been using more silver than they've been mining for many years now, and so there's this huge deficit that is there. And then the thing that seemed to kick it into high gear.

Two things this year, I guess, was what happened in India where they realized that it was undervalued, and so as part of this religious holiday where they go out and accumulate usually gold, this time they went out and got silver and created a big deficit with that. But there was also a disruption when people thought that Trump's

tariffs were going to be applied to silver. It was a huge amount of silver that transferred into the US to try to preempt that tariff charge, and then a huge outflow from London and the other direction into India, and they wound up with not having much physical stuff to be able to aspy people. So it is really changing now. And what's your take on it? What are you seeing there at Wisewolf?

Silver went on sale. You had you had the cartoon Gold and Silver, Yeah, on sales end of the year, and they were and you and I knew, I think instinctially that this is temporary because when the uncert all the uncertainties hit the market, the fear of the uncertainty, of the doubt and then you threw in the tariffs that started this cascading event. You can couple that with countries like Russia putting silver on their balanced sheet as a strategic reserve asset. I thought that was huge, and

it was. It didn't get a lot of coverage or play, but the same thing. You know, the word rupee for the Indian currency comes from rupia, which means silver. So the long history of seeing silver is money. This has

always been an underlying issue. The Hunt family got people to go out and buy physical silver along with themselves, and they drove the price up until they were until they were bankrupted by the deep state, in my opinion, and the powers that be for showing the weakness and the dollar that was forty five years of a lot all and the difference now and you're absolutely right, David, it's not coming from people here, especially in the West.

People like the average citizen is not going out like they were in the nineteen seventies and buying silver, and you know, driving that the scarcity up. I'm seeing massive amounts of silver flow through shops like mine. A lot of places can't even buy anymore because the price has risen so high and the liquidity is dried up. However, the demand continues. But David, the demand is going to institutions.

There are some you know, there's some smart people right now that are just you know, dollar cost averaging or they're realizing that this is not This isn't like a market or a bull market that we've seen before that isn't the top of the market. We're in price discovery at this point because we have forty five years of manipulation based off of paper that again it's always been called out, this doesn't exist. You know, there's two hundred and fifty ounces traded on paper for every one ounce

that exists in a vault in theory. And now we're starting to see all of this stuff and it's it's not just one thing, but it's multiple things. The big takeaway from all this as somebody on the ground, I mean, we go to poor Thanksgiving holiday, you know, it's just under fifty dollars and then I come back that Monday through the weekend and we're almost we almost break sixty dollars an ounce.

we're in price discovery. I don't know where this, but it's again the demand is coming from institutional, multinational and again places like India where it's culturally sought after.

been concealing the amount of gold that they have. They have a lot more gold than they're actually letting onto so I think we have much less than we pretend that we have. China has much less than they're telling everybody that they've got. That's kind of the way I see this thing breaking out. What do you think?

China did is they started secretly buying. They were buying off the books. They didn't want to raise a lot of alarms because they're back then, I mean the beginning of the century. You and I both know what gold was three hundred dollars an ounce. They were just accumulating. Michael Sailors talked a lot about on the bitcoin side. He's like, the first nation that actually turns their printing press on and starts using fiat currency to buy bitcoin is going to win and that's in the bitcoin game

theory of you know, nation state buying of bitcoin. But that really is what happened with gold and China. They started using their currency and they started using the trade deficits that we were giving them this massive transfer of wealth, you know, the trillions and trillions of dollars. They started stacking up gold. And let's not forget China is a net importer of gold. A lot of times when exploration happens in China and there's new mines that are found,

they nationalize them. With ur Kiyosaki, who wrote Rich Dad Pordad found that out. He found a major you know, gold vein and had investors and everything, and then when he went to renew the lease, the Chinese government took the lease. They have sixty thousand gold mines estimated, and I don't know how much gold they have. We supposedly

have about eighty five hundred tons in the US. That's like, you know, about half of that's supposed to be at Fort and O. Because I don't I don't know if it's there or not, but that's about what we're supposed to have. They are probably on parody or have more gold than us. According to several journalists and people than I followed through Kitko. Yeah, so it's it's a question mark.

But they've been buying secretly, David, and that's a strategic move in this century, I think, and knowing what because they planned for the long term, so knowing what happens to the dollar is you know, in those simulations and now we're seeing, you know, d dollarization rapidly.

has eight and thirty three. Unofficially, China's reserves are at least five thousand tons, and some estimates put it at higher than what the US has at eight thousand tons. So you know, they're only declaring anywhere from a half to a quarter of the gold that they have out there, which is kind of interesting. But you know, when you look at what is happening with silver. It is skyrocketing.

And even if you just look at gold and this article he points out the price of gold, if you look at what has happened with gold versus what has happened with the s and P five hundred and NASDAK since two thousand. Since January two thousands, over twenty five year period, nasdak's gone up five point seven percent, the SMP five hundred has gone up four point seven percent,

and gold has gone up fourteen point seven percent. So it's gone up about three times as much as the other two, which are around five, you know, by factor of five, I should say, So it is pretty amazing. And then when you look a at crypto, we're seeing so much stuff about is crypto going to collapse now? And so forth. We've got the CEO of Blackrock, Rat Fink, is out there saying that he's now saying that bitcoin is a fear trade, and so he's kind of walking

some of this stuff back. What do you think is going to happen with that with bitcoin?

and I've talked about this with Travis. I think this is happening with gold, silver, and bitcoin. The price metrics are different with you know, the silver issue is institutions are hungry, they're buying it. There's a limited amount of supply, so it's driving the price up. Same thing with gold, the physical demand for gold driving the price up because

its institutions are buying. That's in a real time price metric. However, with bitcoin it's a little different because you had a you had an all time high in October about one hundred and twenty seven thousand, A lot of the old wallets started to liquidate and sell off, and I and there was some trigger point there where it drove you know, bitcoin back into the into the low eighties, and I think we're above ninety right now.

buying that up. I think the price will reset again on bitcoin, probably some time after the first of the year, by design, and I think they're going to use bitcoin. It's related, David, it's related to the to the stable coin system as an off ramp for a store of value in the digitized sphere. But that's all theory and right now, I mean, that's all price theory. But you're you're right. I mean, this is the market. Trump's been

great for gold because of the uncertainty. If markets were more certain right now, if there hadn't been the we go reverse engineer. That's if there hadn't been the the black Swan event of the tariff threat. If you don't have that cascading event, then you don't see these prices in metals. It takes a lot longer to get there. I knew we would eventually get there, but right now it's just price discovery because of the unknown. So that none of this is about a healthy place. That's not

in a healthy economy. We're not in there's there's too much unknown. Especially those numbers in small business are about tariffs. They're about lack of supply, lack of liquidity, and and uh.

Just a few years ago, he reminded people that he was saying that it was the cryptocurrencies were all about illicit activities that you know, as if using cash or even a bank like HSBC had nothing to do with the drug trade, right, I mean, HSBC was a money launderer for the Sana looa cartel of mini terrorist organiz organisms, and they got caught doing that and fined for doing that many times. But they put it all on bitcoin.

And so he said he didn't think that it was going to be that big because it was simply about illicit money laundering and things like that. But he says, my thought process has always evolved. You and I have talked about especially you have talked about the fact that why would you set up an ETF for bitcoin? Right? Bitcoin is already a digital token, a digital asset, and it is infinitely subdivisible and tradable, just like an ETF. You know, when they token I is a real asset.

That's the argument that they make. We're going to be able to subdivide it infinitely and immediately transfer it, and it's going to be without any national borders or anything that. Well, bitcoin is already there, so why do that? And it was clearly I thought a pumping up scheme, And I think everything that Ratfink a black Rock is doing is really a pumping dump. So now he's out there calling it the asset of fear? What do you read under that?

hundred dollars in bitcoin. So what drives the price there again is institutions, and they did they hijacked it in a way, especially with the ETFs, with the amount of investment that they hold, and they manage for boomers that are not going to go buy most of them are going to have their own wallet. They're not going to be solved and not going to store it and have

cold storage or their own keys. They're gonna they might want to dabble in it, so they get in through one of these products, and it allows black Rock and other big companies to control that supply, and it's going to create scarcity, you know, the price. And I think the individuals out there are just you know, looking into bitcoin is less and less, but institutions grow more and more. It's the same thing. It really is on the same

timeline as what's going on with gold and silver. But because of the supply issue with bitcoin, the way it's different and the way it's digitized, it's not really driving the price yet. I think that's all about taking minite assets in a fiat world away from individuals and on the lower economic strata or the mid economic strata, and putting it into the hands of the giant players. That's my opinion. I think that's going on gold, silver, bitcoin, across the board right now.

which most people aren't. And somebody like Ratfink doesn't have to time the market. He can make the market. He can manipulate the market, you know, so you always he's like the if this is a casino, he's like the house that's there. And most of the time people run casinos don't go bankrupt like Donald Trump. They know what they're doing, So you got to be careful with that type of thing.

I would never be able to do that. I dollar cost average, I buy a little bit and I'm going to hold and I you know, I've put that into my business model, so I will ride bitcoin to zero. If it goes to zero, then I'm going to ride it to zero. I don't think it's going there, but that's a commitment I've already made. And same thing with you know, I might be wrong on metals. I don't see how I would be, given history and the fact that they're gonna as soon as they get this new

FED chair. I mean, I think all bets are off. I think this is the last run of the current dollar system as we know it. I think going into twenty twenty six, and we got four years left before twenty thirty. I think that the printer, the amount of liquidity that's going to be created. David is going to be unprecedented, and it's only going to continue to reflect over in these these prices. I mean, silver's up eighty eight percent over the dollar in the last twelve months. Wow,

eight percent. And I think we're just getting started. I really don't think that we're at the you know, there's always going to be a pullback in times, David. But I given the metrics of what I'm watching now, and this is just being a dealer in two states. And you know, I'm not a big company, but we do enough business nationally to make a dent. And I can promise you it's not what It's not like any other model that I've ever seen since I've been in business.

And I continue to see the price rise and these this flow outwards to wholesalers, and then it's going onwards, like the physical demand is slipping away from regular people going up the ladder to institutions.

early summer is all being taken by these institutions. And yet he says, all the average people coming in here, they're having to sell their silver. And and he said, and I really feel like, you know, that's a that doesn't make any sense. But they don't have the money. They have to liquidate the position. And they were all

saying that. They went around and talked to all these different dealers and they said, yeah, nobody here is buying silver, but it's tremendous demand elsewhere, same thing that you were saying at that. And you know, so this this Kitko article, they got a guy who used to be in the mining industry and he just keeps repeating over and over again. Physical is king, is what he's saying.

Gold Exchange. To me, the very name itself makes it kind of absurd to think that I could trust these people are going to get my money is shanghaied. If I want to one to own gold or silver, I don't want to put it in that type of thing. But the the ETFs that people get into, you know, they're so crazy to get into ETFs. It's not just gold and silver, it's even worse than they put it into bitcoin. But really physical is king, because that's the

only that you know that you've really got it. We've got a couple of questions.

I'm not necessarily all in on it myself. I'm more of a gold and silver guy, and I've always appreciated that gold and silver are proven throughout history. Bitcoin, to me as always again it's had people have gotten mega wealthy off of bitcoin, but in the same way that people sometimes pick winning stocks and the market goes crazy. So to me, that's always been something that's there. It's

like every other cryptocurrency. It's just it's again a speculative thing you can put money in if you have money to burn. To me, it's one of those things like if you've got the extra cash and you want to fool around with it, that's fine, but there's no telling what it's going to do, and there's no guarantee you're going to make money. There's no guarantee you're not going

to lose at all. It's just another speculative asset, whereas gold and silver are proven throughout history, They've always been money and are likely to always be money unless someone, you know, brain wipes everyone on the planet.

been in the space for since twenty sixteen. It is speculative, it is volatile, but bitcoin's unique though in the sense that there is no company. It's it's not you can make an ETF and you can do all the rest,

but the network is still decentralized. And so the theory is in a world of infinite FIOD, it's this finite you know, digitized asset if you want to call it that, And those two ideas are clashing, and to me, I'm always going to go with what is scarce, and especially if the network continues to make inroads and there's more adoption over time, it may not go parabolic the way that it has in the past. You know, when I was by, I bought my first bitcoin at four hundred dollars.

I wish i'd kept it. I didn't. I put it through my machines. I've said that many times on shows. I was just servicing customers. So looking at how far we've gone from buying, you know, four hundred dollars bitcoin in twenty sixteen to one hundred and twenty seven thousand in October, I just think it's a long we have

to wait and see. Where as opposed to gold and silver, physical physical gold and silver with no counterparty risk, you know, holding it like, here's this, I decided, like just for me, I'm a dealer, I'm trying to get for my savings. I'm trying to get one ounce a day if I can do that, if I can afford it, if I can you know, buy it from you know, a bulk

buy or something. But yesterday I just took home a Morgan silver dollar, you know, that's what I's here on my counter and brought it back to my my loft. I just said, I'm going to get one ounce a day if I can and put that away, and I might start doing some posts on that on what type of bounces I'm buying, or you know the history of that coin. But to see if I can dollar cost I average that we'll see I might not. If silver continues to do what it's doing, I might not be

able to afford it. I'm might have to do do half ouncers or you know, three nineteen sixty five. So there's there's a lot of the physical demand is I think, is what's driving the price. And I think we're just getting started.

fifty dollars somewhere in there. We don't quite know, yes, but I think we're just getting started, because it's only a fraction of the real demand that it could be once people I think the average person when they start saying, well, you know, I got to get in on this silver thing. We've seen this in the last few years. I've talked about it on your show, where there's been some some quiet larger purchases that have gone out in my like not just my business, but people that I know and

across the board especially. There was a Texas billionaire put in an order about three years ago for I think it was like, you know, half a billion dollars or something, and it took dealers all over the country to fill that order. Like it wasn't It wasn't like an easy thing because the physical supply is so short. And I think another thing that's happening right now, just a little inside baseball. You look at some of these big wholesalers.

It's taking dealers weeks to get paid. So like if you sell me something and I the closer I can get to spot if I can't sell it to an individual, if I want to sell it to a wholesaler, I might not get paid for a while. So the cash flow is kinking up. So you're seeing again it's this perfect storm where there's the big demand, prices going up, people are selling, and then the liquidity for it drives up. It's it's remarkable to see the price staying where it is based.

So we look at that every single day and it's actually it's really good for if you know me, Like if you're a listening to the show and you want to get in on some silver, maybe just a little bit. We've got stuff at Spot, Like I'm able to sell right now with a bunch of items just at spots. Whatever Spot's trading for, you know, you can always get through David Knight Dot Gold. And I'm not doing an infomercial. I'm just like that is that is huge that that's

never happened before. We've always had premiums placed and a lot of items still do. But there's a whole bunch of stuff right now that we've got that we can just do and trade at Spot. And I think that's the upside to what's happening right now for the average consumer and that wants to get some physical silver, and there's a lot more deals in the market. I do think no matter what the price goes to, you're always going to be able to sell your silver. Okay, I

wouldn't worry about that. It's just you may not get you know, used to back when silver was fifteen dollars an ounce. David, I'll give you ninety five percent a spot on one hundred ounce bar, I might make three percent, you know, especially if if there's no buyers, like on a retail side, i'd sell to a wholesaler. Well, right now, I'm going to buy eighty five, and I don't want to. There's no the wholesaleer is going to take three weeks to pay me, so I have to sell to a refiner.

So it's just there's.

not hyper inflation of gold. We're seeing hyper deflation of the dollar in a sense, yes, and we're going to see a lot more of that because all of the things that are there that are making the dollar lose value are all accelerating, especially under Trump, and so it's really living in a combination of hyper deflation hyper inflation. So you've got a job that I don't envy. It must be very difficult to do that.

Well it was it was planned. They put that into motion, I think because it was exposing the weakness of the dollars. The same thing a less a dramatic you know, a less dramatic push was gold at the same time, because you remember it's eight hundred dollars a bounce I remember in nineteen eighty and then and then collapsed, same thing. So I think that was that was a push with the powers that be and the interest rates being driven to the teens to contract the money supply the dollar

system and the sell off that was forced. There was a forced liquidation. Then nobody picked that that back up. I mean no one, no one ever did what the Hunts did. And that's not what's happening now. There's no one cornering the market. This is literally just twenty five years of manipulation falling.

that we're at the top of a market. This is my opinion and not investment advice.

now it's just a tiny fracture of that. If you look at recycling and urban mining and all the rest of this stuff, it's a teeny tiny fraction of that. The minds are only producing about two hundred million and less than that with the recycling stuff that's out there.

is just long term against the dollar. You can't lose long term. And look at it took forty five five years for silver to hit it's all time high, and there was a lot of a lot of manipulation in between. You can't do that anymore. I think a lot of those bets are off, especially as these nation states. I always point back to that, to that press release by by Russia, and I said, this is going to move things like we haven't seen before in the past. I think I was right.

think history rhymes. You know, you're pointing out that the Hunt brothers and others were looking at the fraud of the of the dollar, and Bretton Wood's too and all the rest of that stuff. But this is broad based. It's so many different aspects that are out there, and that's why I think it is, you know, a pretty pretty safe place to be right now.

Real Octo Spooks says silver rounds ninety nine point nine percent silver can be used for anything immediately, and he also says gold has never lost value. Goodman attempted to make gold too cheap, but there was always a real market jewelers for example, to sell to.

can store value for you. You can't always engage in a one to one paired trade when it comes to goods and services.

get into some metals and get some physical delivery. We've got things that are some really great deals because the closer to SPOT, especially on silver, I can't really do that with gold. Gold is a lot faster to get liquid on than silver right now, so we're able to pass on some things at SPOT, and I think that's

a that's a deal that may never come back. And I will add I think all my analysis over the years, I think I got something backwards where I always thought that the dealers would be those who could could seek supply, and that is very important, but I always looked at it there was going to be a run by individuals

first and then institutions, and I got that backwards. I think the institutions are pushing what's happening now, and there are some you know in other countries like India where individuals are buying, but here in the West, I think it's institutions that are pushing it first and pushing the supply squeeze, and then I think the next evolution of

this will be individuals. I don't think you'll ever have to worry about that question about what happens if silver hits one hundred dollars or plus announcing and be able to get liquid. I think you'll be able to get liquid, even if you're just doing trading like item for item, like you could use it as money. I don't think. I don't think it's ever going to be ill liquid. It's just as far as the old paradigm. You just got to have a trusted dealer that you can do

business with that in that scenario. So a lot of interesting things happening, and not all of it's bad. I think some of it's really good for those who've held silver for a very long time. And I still think these prices are cheap compared to the damage that's been done to the dollar's and what's next.

you can buy and sol gold and silver. He can help you with your IRA, and he can also set up a metal IRA and especially something that is unique to Tony, which is the Wolf Pack, where you can dollar cost average this stuff out, gradually save your money and get it into gold and silver with Wolf pack. You pick the teer that you're in and of course you don't have to you can change that at any point in time. You can even go in and do wolf Pack on a one off, as he's pointed out

in the past. So we do appreciate that kind of flexibility that's there at great customer service from Tony.

they're still on sale. I think, and when you look at one bank after the other, they're all looking at a pretty big appreciation this next year.

So we'll get those the rest of those in there, but it's about twenty or so, I think, I believe you're right, it's twenty or twenty one.

effing people you'll ever meet. He says, they're really kind, and they're even nice out of church. When you leave the church parking lot, everybody lets you go in front of them. There's no one honking in the church parking lot. It works, and so then he starts talking about with or not he thinks the Bible is true, and he says, besides being moved by the kindness of the people that are there and how generous they are in terms of traffic. He says, well, I don't think it's a myth. He says,

I don't believe the whole thing is true. However, he thinks that it's been mixed in. He says, ancient history, and there's a lot of truth in it, but he doesn't think that it is all true, to which I have to say, well, if it is true, you know, you kind of get back in the same territory that C. S. Lewis said about Jesus. He said, you can't say that he's a great moral teacher. You can't really just say that the Bible is history. You know, Jesus is either

a liar, lunatic or lord. Right. And if you think that the Bible is accurate, so much of it is something that was delivered to people who didn't nobody was witnessing what God did with creation. So either Moses just made that up or it actually was something that was from God. If God delivered that information to communicate with us. Do you think he's able to preserve it and to make sure that that communication is not going to be corrupted. That's the whole issue that I have with people who

want to question the credibility of the Bible. And there's a lot who do that. You know, the Muslims do that. Of course, the Mormons do that. And so I think that when you look at the Bible, I think it hangs together, and it hangs together with facts. It hangs together. It's consistent with secular history, it's consistent with archaeology and other things like that that are there, and it's also consistent with what we see in terms of the universe

and with science. But he had another really interesting take here, I thought, and he's kind of as he's thinking about these issues. This is Joe Rogan on what he thinks about AI and Jesus.

that has that issue. I think we've got a lot of Christians who start and who major in prophecies and ignore the more fundamental truths that are there that would I think, help you to understand the prophecies that are there.

really only understood for sure in terms of hindsight. But we can take a look at DNA, and we can look at the intelligent design and the specificity of different animals and how there each of these animals is a completely unique system that's been put there. You know, you have a woodpecker as an example, that's always used kinhem.

It's got very specialized feet that let it perch vertically on the trunk, and it's got specialized beacon shock absorbers and things like that too as it's hammering its head against the against the trunk, and then even has a specialized tongue. None of those things would make any sense and would help. They might even be detrimental if they were to develop one at a time. It all comes together as a unified whole. And when you see that type of thing and you see that in nature, to me,

that is something that is a real faith builder. That's what he should be going over with his daughter if he wants to do things, rather than somebody's interpretation of revelation. And the problem is is that you know, just as he is, he sees the people there at this church and how friendly they are to him, and that makes an impression on him, and we should always be concerned about that how we come across the people. We don't want to, however, surrender truth or our principles just because

we want people to like us. That's what the left wing LBGT churches do, that type of thing. However, we should be concerned if what we are doing is hypocritical. In other words, you know, if you come out of church and start you'll let people in the marking lite. Maybe that's not the thing to do, and maybe that's not the way that we should be representing Christ, because we are ambassadors for Christ and hopefully we would like to be people to be able to see Christ in us.

And we need to look at ourselves and see if we are reflecting Christ. And that's one of the reasons why I feel compelled to speak out against this Zionism that is overwhelming parts of the Christian Church in America, because when people look at genocide and they look at us as we talk about the love of Christ and all these other things, how do those things gel with each other? Are we being a reproach to Christ when we embrace that type of thing. I think we are

as a matter of fact. J. D. Hall went into depth on one particular guy who was being used by Mark Levin to attack Tucker Carlson as Tucker caralson being worse than a Nazi, and he goes as well, I looked at this, and he said, clearly this is hyperbole on the part of Mark Levin. But he said, Mark Levin is saying, you know, other Christians are saying that Tucker Carlson is like that. And so he said, so investigate who these other Christians were. And he said, at

first I just didn't believe it. But my second reaction was curiosity. He said, Levin is not Mark Levin brother is not stupid. He knows what he's doing. So why is a prominent Jewish neo khon using the words of a supposed Christian minister to make a nuclear accusation against a fellow Christian or somebody professes to be a Christian? He said, who is this Christian who allows himself to

be turned into a political weapon for others? Who is this minister who takes his supposed spiritual authority and bends it into a tool for smearing Christian brothers to curry favor with politicians and a foreign government. So so I started digging. What I found was that this guy that he was quoting, his name is Mike Evans, and he's unfound. He wasn't a minister, he's not a pastor, he's not a prophet.

He's not even an evangelist, he said. What I found was that he was a political asset disguised as a Christian leader. What I found was a man who had constructed his identity around servicing the interests of a foreign nation and using theology as a disguise.

of Zion enterprise that he built is on propaganda. It has built on curated narratives, government favored storylines, state approved history, and a political theology that exists only to sanctify the interests of the Israeli government. Evans is steeped in propaganda all the way down to the bone. His museum is a propaganda platform. His media center in Jerusalem is a propaganda hub. His political relationships are propaganda channels. His awards

are propaganda rituals disguised as honors. As a matter of fact, earlier this year, guests who he rewarded, he rewarded.

can't stand her. We don't like her a bit. I hope she's not going to be at the table. I would say, well, she will be.

course Mike Kukabee can't do enough for Israel. And as he's pointing out, he says, these honors that are given out there are all two politicians about politicians, and it's all about gaining political favor.

moral debt that we must repay. And therefore I don't understand anyone who says, I'm a Christian, but I don't really want to support the Jews.

It is officially promoted by the Ministry of Tourism, it's endorsed by the Ministry of Jerusalem and Heritage, and it is highlighted by the Jerusalem Department Authority. No foreign ministry anywhere on the planet is granted this level of state integration unless it serves a national purpose. And take a look at the difference between how they treat this guy's museum and how they treat Christians, actual Christians and drew some more Christian churches and that type of thing a

world of difference. Evans built his museum to glorify Christian Zionists as saviors of Israel. The Israeli state embraced it because that narrative is politically useful. Politically useful, it reinforces the idea that Christian support is not just sentimental but historical, that's the point of the Covenental and morally mandated. It creates a felt obligation in Christians to defend Israel even when Israel acts unjustly. And it wraps all of this

in a religious vocabulary that discourages dissent. And when you look at people like Mike Huckabee. He's constantly talking about Israel, not about Christ.

The idea of soldiers are brought to FOZ as part of their educational programming, where they're shown a curated story of Christian solidarity that reinforces the idea of an international alliance that is rooted in faith, faith, and what faith in Christ, That's what my faith is in so FOZ.

He reinforces a worldview that the Israeli military leadership wants soldiers to internalize, and that worldview says that global Christianity, especially the American evangelical sector, is the unshakable ally whose political pressures can be counted on when Israel faces criticism or conflict. The museum is a classroom for that doctrine. And of course, you know when we look at this, you know the guy besides Huckabee, the guy who has said I want to be the number one defender of Israel,

course is Ted Cruz. And what did he recently do. He basically said, anybody that talks about the USS liberty is anti Semitic. And what was that? That was an American intelligence ship is actually ANSSA that was repeatedly attacked by the Israeli government and they could see the American flag that was there. There were radio calls and all

the rest of the stuff. A continual attack, a betrayal, just like what Jonathan Pollard did, and just like what Israel did with the intelligence that Jonathan Pollard did, betraying America. And yet don't talk about that, said Ted Cruz, because then if you do, you're racist. How pathetic that is? That is as pathetic as a left When they see you they don't like your politics or your economics, they call you racists.

And if you want an illustration of this, several weeks ago, Jade Vance was down at Old miss at a turning Point gathering and one kid got up, got the asked this viciously anti submitic question. The most horrifying thing to me is what happened in the second later, which is the crowd erupted in applause. Not everybody. My guess is twenty to thirty percent of the kids there were applauding

the viciously anti semitic question. A week or two later, there was another event, what was the question with Eric and Laura Trump at Auburn University. A kid got up and said, I can do even better and asked such an anti Semitic question.

is blessing us. You know, it's very much like what happened with Jonathan Pollard and Benjamin Netanya, who who is an ally has been a long term multi decades. He's been a partner with Mike Evans, who's running this friends of zion thing. And of course it's Benjamin nett Yahu who welcomes Jonathan Pollard brought back on a private plane by Miriam Addelson. Here as he gets down, he kisses the ground because he's so happy to be outside of America. This is the land that he loves. And how he

betrayed America. It's that kind of betrayal that we're talking about. And so if you talk about genocide, which is what it's called when you decide that you're going to kill everybody in an area so that you can have their land or whatever, which is clearly what's going on. They say that over and over again. And so we recently had a woman who was another well known Zionist, and she was talking about, we got to stop just mowing

the lawn. What she's talking about is we don't just go out and mow the lawn and mow these people down and kill them. We got to kill them once and for all. You know, their version of a final solution.

What is the issue of that? Well, this partnership that Mike Evans has with the IDF, with their museum and their educational thing there, he says that the IDEAF participates in the Friends of Zion programming. One of the clearest proofs that the Ministry is not merely adjacent to Israel Israeli state power. It is a part of Israeli state power. Friends of Zion is more than a cultural outpost, more

than a museum. It is a weight bearing pillar of the political architecture that binds American evangelical support Israeli lobbying objectives. Mike Evans has spent decades cultivating relationships with the American political operators, presidents, and members of Congress. He has spent decades, since the nineteen eighties, cultivating an even closer relationship of Benjamin Netanyahu, a relationship that Israeli journalists have documented since

the nineteen eighties. Netanyahu's repeated appearances at Friends of Zion events are not sentimental gestures. They are visible performances of a political alliance. Of course, where do he get started in the nineteen eighties, Well, if you go back and look at what Mike Evans was doing back in the nineteen eighties, he was pushing the Iraq war because that's what Netanyahu did, and then he's pushing more recently, the Iran war because that's what Netanyahu wants. And so he

pushes all of these different wars. He's got all of these prophecy and Christian ministries that are instead of pushing lies about weapons mass destruction, they're pushing lies about biblical prophecy. That's really what is happening here. They get us into these wars so they deliver the friends of Zion what

no formal lawby can deliver. It delivers millions of deeply loyal evangelical voters who accept Israel's political interest as if they were Christian moral duties, which is exactly what Mike Huckabee is constantly saying.

with those who oppose him in every way. When FOZ gives its Friends of Zion Award, the recipients are overwhelmingly political leaders, not ministers or theologians. These awards are distributed to sitting presidents, prime ministers, monarchs, foreign policy actors, ambassadors like Huckabee, who function as a seal of evangelical legitimacy, a public blessing that signals to millions of American Christians that this person is a defender of God's chosen people.

And again it is pure politics with a thin veneer of false theology. That's what we're talking about here. Foz can mobilize pastors who will spend consecutive Sundays preaching in favor of Israeli government policy. He says, as hard as I looked, I couldn't find a single example of Friends of Zion or Mike Evans ever preaching Jesus Christ or his Gospel to israelis nothing, not a hint of gospel

witness whatsoever. Can you imagine all of those millions from evangelicals in America thinking that they're doing something loving when the most loving thing of all would be to share the good News that is completely absent from their work. All these people who say they love Israel and don't talk to them about Christ, don't bother them with that. They're already God's chosen people. You know, they're saved because of their DNA or something that is not Christian. That

is not true. And anybody who says that has left the faith. They have faith and politics not in Christ. Before Friends of Zion existed as a brand, Mike Evans operated the Jerusalem Prayer Team, an organization that raised money for the municipal projects in Jerusalem, including direct fundraising for the New Jerusalem Foundation, and the leadership of then Mayor Ahud Ohmayer. Okay, he was the He later became Prime Minister if you remember his name, just recently came up

as one as the controller for who Jeffrey Epstein. This is what you're buying into the Epstein masad stuff. Friends of Zion tell its donors that their contributions bless God's chosen people. What it does not tell them is that those donations finance Israeli municipal budgets, Israeli social programs, Israeli military educational initiatives, Israeli media operations, Israeli diplomatic functions, and

Israeli tourism infrastructure. These donors believe they're supporting a spiritual mission, but in reality they're actually underwriting the soft power of a foreign government. Friends of Zion is not simply an allied to Israel. It is a quiet extension of Israeli state craft. We're talking about politics and governments here says it is the same spirit that takes something earthly and

elevates it to something divine. Friends of Zion has taken a modern state with all of its sins, with all of its scandals, with all of its injustices, and its political agendas, and has placed it on the altar. Guess who the altar boy was for the Israeli state Jeffrey Epstein. Then it turns and demands that Christians sacrifice truth and integrity on that altar, even if it means slandering faithful brothers. That's the key issue, folks. That's why I can't stay

silent about this. This has become a stench, it really has. And it's a stench based on not just what the Israeli government has done, but a stench as to the devotion and the worship that nominal Christians have done. And I say nominal because they take the name of Christ, but they don't follow him.

and that's what we're seeing here. And so we got a couple of comments here before the program ends.

And there was a comment there about Terry cath and I, you know, didn't follow Chicago enough to know the names of all the different people. I knew Pancal's name because he was a I believe it's been a long time. I think pankw was the trombonist. I thought he was really a fine musician. But they were talking about the guitarist, and it turns out that he died when he was only thirty one. He was the founder of Chicago. He died at the age of thirty one, and he almost disbanded,

you know, kept him together. Doc Severnson talked to them and said, you need to stay together. But he was a really fine guitarist and the lead vocalist and the founder of the group. He shot himself by accident. He was playing around with He liked guys. He's playing around with them, and he had the classic mistake of not realizing that he had a semi automatic that still had a bullet chambered in the round playing aroundies. That's what do you think I wanna do? Blow my brains out?

Famous last words. So sad to see it, but that's unfortunate anyway. On that note, I'm afraid that bit of disappointment that's right, we will say thank you for tuning in and we hope you have a nice day. Thank you God, bless y'all. The common man. They created common Core. They've dombe down our children. They created common Past to track and control us. They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.