Thu Episode #2123: Trump Wants Retribution, Not Justice

Before we get into that, we'll talk about one thing they does right, and that is the climate stuff. This is how bad things have gotten in the EU where they have gone full on board with net zero beyond ridiculous. EU automakers are purchasing carbon credits from Chinese ev makers in order to avoid EU climate change finds. So think about this. They are not allowed to make internal combustion engines.

Those are going to be outlawed pretty soon and there are penalties for it, and if you make them, you have to buy credits, carbon credits. They're having to buy them from their competitors in the EV market. So what's the chance that they're going to be able to make a transition to evs. I think the chance is a net zero. They're just going to shut down and de industrialize Europe. They're pretty far along that path already in terms of power generation, and you can't have manufacturing if

you don't have power generation. Manufacturing will be done by highly automated factories, and the key thing in that is going to be power. It already is when you're talking about very energy intensive things like making steel and automobiles. So this is a total insanity europeas finds associated with the production of gasoline powered engines if the auto company

doesn't hit targets for the sales of evs. So what they want to do is to give money to their Chinese competitors who are making evs and who are making evs with the cheapest, dirtiest power available. I mean, they're the EPA And all this climate stuff started with protecting the environment It was all initially about air pollution that you could see, that you could smell, and then it transitioned into shutting everything down on the basis of emissions.

After they cleaned everything up, they didn't stop there. They had a new mission. They wanted to shut down all power and not aligned with what the globalist one to do.

in order to have a global government. So they manufacture this problem, and it's good that Trump is pushing back against. That's the only thing that I can see in the registration that is good. Frankly, seriously, the only thing we have a ev bus that was pulled after a fire here.

of inspections following an assessment request. They add that after identifying a wiring issue, all affected Lion Electric and Diesel buses have been removed from service and that no buses will return to service until a permanent solution from Lion and Transport Canada is in place.

they're pink recently. You know, this is another thing actually coming from Jaguar. This is maybe you know, you can have electronic bus, that electrical bus with battery that catch fire. Maybe it'll be friendly because it'll have a face like Thomas a tank engine and and eyes that look at you. Look at this, it's it's got eyes to make it more friendly. They put a face on it and in that nice and look at the eyes looking at the person there. Hello, I'm here to carry you. Isn't that great?

That's what Jaguar has become. That's a Jaguar, folks. This how do we get to the point of idiocracy? And how did we get there so quickly? You know, it was just ten years ago, in twenty fifteen, the Jaguar was leaning into its role as the villain car in the Bond films. Have you ever noticed Talian Hollywood movies? All the it's a played by prince and all the villain's cars were Jaguars. I don't think you're gonna get a Jaguar, that little car with the eyes that are rolling around.

all about the Trialotal Commission and making doing consolidation. First economically, that's why they call it the World Economic Forum. They come at you first with money and that's the way they conquer people. Now the guns come later. The Chinese car companies can then use the carbon credit revenue to subsidize lower priced Chinese evs into the European car market, thereby undercutting the European EV car companies. Except it began

long before that. If you go back to the twenty fifteen, right about the time they did that bond commercial there, that was when the hammer really fell. It's taken about ten years to see the effect of it. But that was a Paris Climate Accord saying that you've got to putting mandates for reduction of energy use on Western countries Europe, US and others. And of course we were never part

of that treaty. Trump pretended that it had been legitimately entered, and he pretended that he had to leave it under the conditions that were there. But there's absolutely no way that well, you know, for the Trump model, he doesn't want to push back against the authority of the president.

You see, it was important for him to pretend that Obama and John Kerry could put us into a treaty without the Senate as required by the Constitution, because Trump is about first and foremost about a unitary executive, that we have a king, that we have someone who can do whatever he wishes and there's not any need to get any permission from the Constitution and legislative bodies. He just does as he wishes. So he wasn't going to

push back against that. He pretended that we were in it, so he had to stay in it for the entire four years. That was clearly a clause that was put in for the American government that was there. Now this time around, after he got back in the second time, he only had to stay in for a year. So this is he's still playing by the rules as if

the president can put us into a treaty. But that's the thing that basically killed it for the Western companies to de industrialize them was the twenty fifteen Paris Climate Accord. Because China does not have to have any reductions, China and India were allowed to continue to expand had no restrictions on how dirty their power plants could be either, and so they've been given an advantage on energy as

well as on labor costs. And now the EU is out there penalizing anybody that doesn't buy the kind of cars that were designed to be made and sold by China. This whole thing has been you want to talk about bond villains. I mean they're the ones who put this whole thing through. The bond villains who are shutting down Jaguar, actually the green flagship Beyond Meat. I've got an update to this. I talked about this. It was just last week on the sixteenth, though, we had Beyond Meat falling

to under a dollar. I think it went down to fifty cents. It had at stock, had been at two hundred and thirty five dollars in twenty nineteen, and it crashed to less than one dollar. And we were all celebrating that yesterday because that's Bill Gates's company and it's like good, glad to see him losing that money. However, amongst other things have been happening this week that are kind of strange, and we to talk about a strange week.

Gold drops a little bit, I mean, still way up, but Beyond Meat had a rally where stock went up by one thousand percent. This is strange the times that we live in are I went up more than one thousand percent after hit the new low last week. But of course, you know we need to get down to fifty cents. It's pretty easy to have big gains, isn't it when your stock used to be two hundred thirty five?

Shares of Beyond Meat surged sixty three percent yesterday to around five dollars and eighty cents, so it stock hit an all time enter day low of fifty on October sixteenth, capping what was a seventy five percent decline on the week after the company announced its creditors had accepted a debt swat swap that would substantially dilute shareholders. See this is what I mean when you have Wall Street, when you're talking about what's going on with the large agricultural

companies versus the small and medium sized farmers. It's corporations. If it's somebody like con Agra or Archer Daniel Midland, they operate on Wall Street. They can be literally bankrupt, they can lose money for decades, and they can continue to sell their story on Wall Street, and they can essentially conjure up money out of nowhere just on the basis of stories. And so that's what we see going on here. They are bankrupt, nobody wants their product, but

they can still keep them alive on Wall Street. And you can still have a thousand percent gain if you jump in on this thing. That's why. That's how they keep raising the money, because they make it into a casino. So one trader named Dmitri some nickkin have been pushing Beyond Meats stock on Reddit after announcing that he had acquired a four percent steak. He was bullish on Beyond Meats debt movement, suggesting a YouTube video under the name cabybara stocks.

others beyond meat. The IPO came in twenty nineteen, quickly became a penny stock after trading at around two and thirty dollars during its peak. Is briefly heralded by Bank of America analysts as among its Reddit stocks to watch. So there you go. This is the partnership back and forth of big financial people taking advantage of the greater fools that are out there. And then this essay from a guy who was very involved in the climate cult and has now recanted at least the catastrophic panic that

was part of it. He still believes in global warming. He hasn't grown up completely. He can now walk and say Mama and Papa. So this is this guy was the story was put out. Originally they thought that it was William Nordhouse, who was really big in the climate movement, but turned out it was his nephew Ted, who said, he said, I no longer believe this hyperbole. Why I stopped being a climate catastrophist, and why so many climate

pragmatists can't quit catastrophism. And of course when we were in the UK in two thousand and two thousand and one. That was the whole Gaya thing was just everywhere. It was in the museums, especially the Children's Museum. It was on somebody had left behind a science magazine, a British science magazine, and James Lovelock was on the cover and it was all about his Gaia theory, which is based

on Greek mythology. Guya was Mother Earth. That's why when you hear all these Hollywood actors and actresses talking about Mother Earth, there is angry with us. I mean, they're really serious. This is not a margarine commercial from the seventies. They're really serious. They anthropomorphized the Earth. And when we went to the Children's Museum that had a loop playing. While you guys were playing, we were watching the loop

and I was filming it. Someday I'm going to find that on one of the videotapes and I'll play it for all of you. It was just astounding. But what it said was the Earth was this living, conscious, sentient entity, right they projected onto it like it was Ai or something, and humans were a virus and so you know, we've got to do a virus is got to kill him. And it was just really sinister. Well, James Lovelock, who

put out the gaia theory, has now recanted. He's not even doesn't believe in global warming.

virtually a sure over the next fifty years. If we continue to burn as much coal and oil as we've been burning, the heating of the earth will cause the sea levels to rise, the Amazon to collapse, Well, Amazon collapse this week, but anyway, online according to scenarios commissioned by the Pentagon, Yeah, there we go. Sold to us another Why it'll trigger a series of wars over basic resources like food. Norse is right. I no longer believe this hyperbole. Yes, the world will continue to warm as

long as we keep burning fossil fuels. He still believes that myth and sea levels will rise about nine inches over the last century, perhaps another two or three feet over the course of the rest of the century, but

the rest of it not so much. And of course there's been a string of people who have said, Okay, I believe in global warming, and even if this man make global warming, like you said, it's what's a big deal, right, sea level goes up a little bit, it gets a little bit warmer, we grow food more, things like that,

And that's where this guy is now, he says. For a long time, even after I'd come to terms with the fundamental disconnect between what climate advocates were saying about extreme events and the role that climate change could conceivably be playing, I held on to the possibility of catastrophic climate futures based upon uncertainty. The string, as they say, is in the tail, meaning so called fat tales and

the climate risk distribution. These are tipping points at similarly low probability, But like the supposed collapse of the Amazon, once you look more closely at these risks, they don't add up to catastrophic outcomes for humanity. A lot of people have been saying that a lot of people have been saying, so what if everything that you're saying is true, it doesn't kill us. It doesn't destroy the earth. If it changes of the climate changes, we adapt to it.

And when you look at this stuff about the Amazon collapsing all the ready, we've been told the coral resource, and course that's not true either. We're told that all the glaciers are going to be gone by twenty nineteen, on and on and on. Everything they have told us is a lie.

They pretend to predict the weather. And so you see this story everywhere the Mirror, the heavy snow is going to bury New Yorkers this winter, with one hundred inches expected. How in the world could they possibly know that. Remember back when RF Kate Junior was at about two thousand and nine or something said our children will never see snow. We've played that over and over again. But now we're going to see one hundred inches of snow. There's absolutely no way they can know any of this. This is

like predicting the number of hurricanes in the season. They don't know that either. And so this is a story that was done by the Mirror, left wing environmentalists, picked up by the Drudge Report, pushed around and when you look at their source for all this stuff, it's coming from the Old Farmer's Almanac. This was Benjamin Franklin's marketing trick that he did on people in terms of predicting what the weather was going to be like half a

year in advance. According to the Climate Addiction Center, there is a seventy one percent chance that La Nina will influence the climate between October and December the al Nina Southern oscillation is a natural recurring climate cycle, with La Nina representing the cold phase. So they're Nino and Nina. So one is they're like the Ying and Yang, cold and hot. We're gonna take a quick break, but before we do, get somebody's comments here about.

slave labor. The killer thing that they've added to all that now is this huge advantage and the price of energy by changing making electricity so expensive, power so expensive in the UK, that shut down the steel plants, the last of them, and other things like that without them having to do a direct mandate to shut them down. They just do it indirectly. They can't compete.

you have some serious capabilities. Got to fully submerge those suckers, and even then got to keep them submerged. The real Octospook truth is we are in a period of carbon dioxide starvation of plants. Optimal is two to three xs of now and higher for optimum plant growth and health.

first discuss geoengineering, they're not serious. Soil and gooy. Why the hell would negative eugenesis want to save humanity from climate change?

unlike the other sick offense that were there. Although ram Paul has been pretty good about criticizing Trump on the Venezuela thing, and the anger from Trump is escalating towards both Thomas Massey and ram Paul, both from Kentucky. Kentucky better watch their back. They're going to get invaded pretty soon here, I think. Anyway, Tom Tillis and Mediaite has the story here. They say he's from South Carolina. He's from North Carolina. He ripped Trump on Wednesday of the

terrible optics. That's his term of chasing two hundred and thirty million dollars a taxpayer money, and his report bid to sue the Justice Department for past legal battles. The New York Times reported on Tuesday that Trump had filed a lawsuit over the years long investigations into him during Biden's term. You had Merrick Garland, you had special counsel Jack Smith. They brought two major cases against Trump, one concerning his alleged retention of classified documents and another over

efforts to overturn the twenty twenty election. And so again, all of this stuff we saw for what it was. We said, you know, criticize him for something that's real. It's a target rich environment. You had to make stuff up to criticize or to impeach Donald Trump. You got plenty of real things, but they pick these phony things because they wanted to put him in office. And by doing this kind of phony law fair they basically put him in the presidency. They gave him a pass on

debating anyone. And we have an interesting story coming up about a Republican candidate who couldn't get the Democrat candidate to debate, so he created an AI model of the Democrat and he debated the Democrat. Now that's a good one. I think that at least you get them to come back and say no, I wouldn't have said that, you know, so you can maybe get them to comment on policy

one way or the other. But you know, Trump should be grateful that they did all this stuff and put him in because it all benefited him and we all knew that. And you had people who were Democrats who were not part of the Democrat machine at the time. So people like James Carvill and many others saying you're going to put him in office, you know, you're making a hero out of him. Does on people because they see this is nonsense that's out there. And I was

saying the same thing too. I'm not a Democrat, but the Democrat machinery, controlled by the same people that control the Republican machinery, wanted Trump in, so they were doing that. Carvel was on the outside free to say it, and now Tillis is on the outside of the Republican machine, he's free to say what the real issue is about this.

So a journalist asked about the lawsuit, and Tillis said, it's terrible optics, particularly right now we're talking about a quarter of a billion dollars transferring maybe to the president when we're in a shutdown posture because we supposedly don't have enough money. The journalists followed up said should Trump Trump drop the ask? Tillis replied, I think right now

is really bad timing for this. We had cent Bill Cassidy and John Corner also both asked about this, but they want to run again for office, and so they were afraid to say anything that'd be critical of Trump. Everybody knows what this looks like. Trump knows what it looks like. He's just so greedy he doesn't care. So Tillis is openly clashed with Trump on the Big Beautiful Bill,

which is why he's having to retire now. So Trump just laid out the bare absurdity of John Roberts catastrophic decision, says an analysis from a writer on mother Jones. Another leftist site. Reporter Pima Levy describes how Trump can make the decision to demand that the Justice Department pay him

two hundred and thirty million dollars of taxpayer money. Quote, because thanks to the Supreme Court's recent decisions, the executive branch can basically be described as a king that colossal cash transfer that Trump is requesting can happen due to the High Court opinions from Roberts, in which the Court has shifted the fundamental structure of the American government, such as federal agencies, including the Justice Department, are mere extensions

of the president's will. The reality is that Roberts set the ground work for Trump's latest shakedown. The absurdity of the decision was laid bare on Tuesday. The president gets to pay himself hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer dollars tax payer money because he controls all executive branch personnel and all the decisions, and there's probably nothing anyone can do about it, wrote Levy. Congress could and should pass a law prohibiting such payments, and dare the Supreme

Court to shut it to strike it down. But this Congress is not going to do anything like that. Trump must to be compensated after the investigations of Russia involvement and interference in the twenty sixteen election and his alleged mishandling of classified documents. Now that he's back in the White House, Trump plans to make the government pay. He grasps the fact that he has the absolute power to do it. He even admitted it. This is what Trump said.

He said, well, with the country, it's interesting because I'm the one that makes the decisions. He said in the Oval office on Tuesday, following questions about the payments that he'd requested. He said, that decision will have to go across my desk. It's awfully strange to make a decision where I'm paying myself. So basically, he's just going to write himself a check out of the Treasury because he's

a king. Trump is seeking to move forward with a ten billion dollar lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal of the Epstein birthday book story. You know, first he came out and he said, you just made that up. That doesn't exist. I never did anything like that. It's a complete lie. And then the actual book was released by the committee investigating by the Democrats who are investigating it, and you could see that it was exactly as the

Wall Street Journal had described. But rather than dropping the lawsuit, he's going to continue with it because you know, a lot of people a leak at to say, well, it's only fair that Trump gets two hundred thirty million dollars because he paid a lot of legal fees to defend himself, and he did. But I look at that as just the cost of becoming president, because that ridiculous law fair that they came against him was the best thing that

ever happened to him. And so, but if lawfair is wrong, why is Trump doing it to the Wall Street Journal and to other organizations for what they have reported? Lawyers for Trump are asking for a federal judge in Florida to deny a request by the Wall Street Journal and its parent companies to dismiss a ten billion dollar defamation lawsuit or the papers reporting about the body letter allegedly penned by Trump that appeared in a birthday book for

Jeffrey Epstein. Look, Wall Street Journal didn't defame Trump, it defined him. The big difference between defamation and definition. And Trump is further clarifying what he is with all of his actions here. In a court filing late on Monday, Trump's lawyers argued that the July article the surrounding coverage were a quote deliberate smear campaign designed to damage Trump's reputation.

Don't talk about Epstein, okay, and don't mention to anybody that Epstein was Trump's best friend for over fifteen years. That would be a smear campaign. And you can't even acknowledge that he hung out with him, and he pretends that he doesn't even know who Gleaine Max. I haven't heard that name in a long time. I heard it the other day. Yeah, maybe I do something with that. So he is going to do something with that.

which is clearly was an op ed piece. It was an opinion piece. But he was upset. He said, they put that on the front page. You can you can have an opinion, and you can have an opinion that opposes Trump, but not in his mind.

It was a smear. Last month, the House Oversight Committee released records from Epstein's estate that included a copy of a birthday book with the alleged letter from Trump. The newspaper had described exactly. Trump continued to argue that the letter is fake and that the signature of the letter is not his Well, he is a joke. It's not

a joke between friends. Everybody sees what Trump is. Everybody knows what he did for fifteen years, and even Maga can see it, and they're starting to get upset about it.

out together. Well, Milania is suing people for billions of dollars if they report what Michael Wolfe reported. But the real the dog that didn't bark or the wolf that didn't hallow, is the fact that she has not sued Michael wolf He is the source of all this. Is she afraid that if she sues him, that he's going to produce the tapes as part of discovery. Is that she's not suing Michael wolf because she doesn't want discovery to show that what he said is true, that maybe

she was one of Epstein's girls. Anyway, Mike Johnson has had what the opponents are calling an own goal. In other words, he scored against himself, crippling the GOP's shutdown message. What are they talking about? Well, I mentioned a few days ago that the attorney general in Arizona said she was going to sue. She's a Democrat. She said she was going to sue Mike Johnson if he didn't swear in this newly elected congresswoman from Arizona. Her father was

the congressman there. He died of a heart attack earlier this year. That had special election. She won the special election, and she would be the final vote, that they need to force the release of all the information that's being hidden about Epstein and that the Congress has, and he wants to stop that. And so Mike Johnson's refusal to seat a newly elected Democrat is hindering the GOP's shutdown message.

His fear of the possible release of the Epstein files is a self inflicted wound, showing that there is a fire wherever Sepstein smoke is really I think, and also I guess we could say this is the streissand effect writ large everything that Trump is doing in terms of his panic to cover up about Epstein. I mean, they obviously never understood the metaphor of the Streiss in effect. You know, the more you try to cover up something like that publicly, the more the people are convinced there's

something there. I'm convinced there is. The Republican Party's message to voters that the government shutdown has no end in sight. Is the fault of Democrats being muddled by House Speaker Mike Johnson, whose refusal to seat a newly elected Democrat is sucking up all the oxygen in the room. According to a journalists politicos Jonathan Martin said Johnson is handcuffing his own parties attacks on the Democrats by not swearing

in Arizona's at Elita Grijalva. I guess this way pronounce her name, who was elected to fill her late father's seat in the House. Arizona's attorney general is now suing the speaker for dragging his feet. Martin noted that Johnson's fears about the possible release of the Epstein files with Grihalva being the deciding vote, it's complicating getting the government back to work. He said, I mean this is about

at least in part, the Epstein files. Republicans know that she is the decisive vote here and would be able to release that. This is also just reflective, It seems to me of an own goal. It's a reminder that he's keeping the house out and that something at a moment of the shutdown that I think a lot of that is contributing, I think to why the Republicans are faring so poorly in the polls. Well, look, we alreadys saw when this began to come around, even before they

had the votes. Mike Johnson was so afraid of it that he shut down Congress a week earlier. I mean they already were taking off their August reset. They take off essentially the entire month of August added another week to it, so this would not come up to a vote, even though it was likely that they didn't have the

votes to make this thing pass. And so not only has he drawn more attention to this, not only has he shown that as a Trump sickophant, he is absolutely desperate to keep this covered up, but he has now made it possible for this thing to pass because by kicking the ball down the road, now they have another representative who is going to vote for that they would have been one vote short. So Arizona issuing the US House Speaker Johnson actually over the delay in swearing in

this Democrat, Grijalva, if I'm pronouncing her name correctly. The state of Arizona on Tuesday sued she's fifty four. She won special election, as I said, after her father died March of a heart attack. Johnson has said that he will swear her in when the House returns, but has kept lawmakers out of Washington for more than a month, saying they'll not return until the Senate passed. This is

a measure to end the ongoing government shutdown. This case is about whether someone duly elected to the House who indisputably meets the constitutional qualifications of the office, maybe denied her rifle office simply because the Speaker has decided to keep the House out of regular session, said the Arizona Attorney General. She argued that the US Constitution does not

grant Johnson the authority to thwart the people's choice. But again, it's a stupid decision, especially because this is inevitable, it's going to eventually happen. You know, he's just minding himself a little bit of time. Is he trying to stall this, hoping that there's going to be a war that will swamp the news about this. Maybe, you know before if they stall long enough, we could start the war with Venezuela and nobody paying any attention, he claims. He says, well,

we run the house. She has no jurisdiction. We're following the precedent. She's looking for national publicitying apparently she's gotten some good luck with that. Well, the reality is is that he is not following the precedent. He has sworn people in under the same circumstances. In the past, Grihova has vowed, once sworn in, to provide the final signature needed to release the Epstein files that the Trump administration

is desperate to hide Arizona. In this lawsuit, accused Johnson of delaying her swearing in to prevent her from signing on to this bill. Johnson cannot continue to disenfranchise the entire district, is what they're saying on this. Well, you know, this is just part of the disgusting partisan politics that are there. Marjorie Taylor Green has had enough of it. She's one of the few Republicans three Republican women in addition to Thomas Massey, who would vote to release this.

Here's what she had to say about this corrupt two party system.

his father's fortune. So that really got him upset. But the thing that's getting him really upset right now is an obsession is South Park. They've done some very crude, disgusting jokes because it's South Park, that's all, but that's what they do. They've done a lot of crude and disgusting stuff with Donald Trump getting Satan pregnant and all the rest of this stuff and making fun of Trump's

tiny body parts. So they recently aired this episode and now they have been put on their programs have been delayed, and so they're saying, well, it's Trump going to get us kicked off like he got Jimmy It Jimmy Kimmel kicked off. Yeah, And so he's working behind the scenes, they say, to have South Park pulled from the air after the animated.

nothing happens to him. It's truly amazing. So anyway, South Park is the next one that he wants to get canceled, and so they mocked him, showed him allegedly naked and other things like that, as they point out, that's what south Park does. It's a disgusting program. But Trump working behind the scenes is something that sounds very realistic because South Park is run by Paaramount and who just bought

Pairmount Trump's friends, the Ellison family. You know, Larry Ellison was the guy there on the first day of office US selling the Stargate thing, MR and A plus artificial intelligence. And now Larry Ellison's son, I guess that would be Larry Ellison, Ellison's son, Larryson. Yeah, there you go. Well, he's got his daddy's money and he's out there creating a media empire. He's buying up and getting control of the Ellison family is getting control of TikTok because of

the government's maneuvering against TikTok. He bought up Paramount and actually Viacom, which holds Paramount and CBS and many other properties that are out there, and so they're getting massive media companies across many different types of platforms. So this is a whole new vector of consolidation and centralization of

media control. And so I think it probably is since they're closely allied, since Trump made sure that Ellison is going to have a seat at the table on TIKO talk, that there probably is some truth to this, that this will likely be happening.

stressand effect that he just cannot help himself. Episode three of the current season was recently unexpectedly delayed this week, fueling speculation that of White House pressure over at airing. A source close to the production claimed Trump has been fuming about the way South Park portrayed him. He's convinced the writers are obsessed with humiliating him and is now trying to use back channel pressure to make sure the show does not survive. He wants to do Jimmy Kimmel

on him. Another insider said the President hates being made fun of, especially about his body and about his genitals, so this crossed the line. I think any criticism of Trump crosses the line with him. That's why you just had Tom tollis that we began with. He's not running for Senate again simply because he refused to vote for Trump's bill. He didn't make fun of Trump, he didn't

ridicule him with satire. Satire is even worse. The delay of episode three has sent shockwaves through the writer's room. Everyone is braced to the possibility the plug could be pulled altogether. And of course they didn't just stop with Trump. They also made fun of JD. Vance and all this.

They made fun of Christinome portraying her as a puppy killer whose surgically altered face slides off, and Vice President jad Vance was portrayed as a sidekick that was doing disgusting things for Satan, and both of them replied publicly se Vance did it the right way. He came back with his own sarcasm. He said, well, I guess I finally made it. They made fun of me on South Park.

That's the way to shut these things down. Instead, Trump is going to come on with guns blazing and make heroes out of these disgusting people.

hundred and thirty million right there. So that's a quotment to what they're getting paid for an entire season for them and everybody else that was there. Another source claim for Trumpet's personal it always is he's never forgiven late night hosts for laughing at him, and he sees south Park is even more damaging because it appeals to young viewers. After Kimmel's cancelation, insiders believe that Trump feels emboldened because he didn't learn anything at all from it.

than just hating Trump. And this is why I think it's very danger that the Republicans for their purpose are dangerously wrong, and for our purpose, they're dangerously wrong. There are real issues here with what is being done. And his take on this was that Americans were rejecting the national security state, rejecting the federalization of police, the militarization of police, and that type of thing. And so he shows a picture of somebody holding up a sign, are

you NSPM seven compliant? And again that is executive order from Trump, though we talked about last week, and so it's not even about the issue. It's about the federalization of police and the militarization of police issue. I agree with him on the immigration stuff. I think people that are here illegally need to go home. One of the things that they can do to facilitate that is to

stop giving them money. Has Trump stopped that? No, It's just like that example the guy who got the one hundred and thirty dollars ticket because he didn't have his identity papers on him and I said, well, I can't, I've got the identity papers, and I let him go, but then they hit him with his fine. He goes, I can't afford that. I'm living in government paid housing. I don't have a job. Now we'll go home instead.

They're going to keep that going well. The major media focused on crowd size and potential violence I never materialized. The New King's protests had another message. Millions of Americans reject the entire framework of the national security state. Protesters I talked to expressed opposition to more than just the president and trump Ism, but to the entire national security apparatus, the FBI, ICE, Homeland Security, the National Guard, and the military.

This one doesn't see a savior this time in this protest, they said. Unlike the other protests in his first term, this protest did not see a savior in the FBI or even in the Democrat Party. Instead, they're putting their faith in ordinary people like themselves. Seven million plus Americans gathered with homemade signs and costumes, rejecting the relentless threat

mongering and some domestic terrorism enemy from within talk. That's what I think is really dangerous, And like I said, I would, you know, that's what I would show up to protest. I don't want to go to the extent. These people that he talked to laughed about the fact that of Antifi. Many of them said, I don't even know what antifi is. They're going to embrace it because Trump criticized it, but they see the troops being moved in.

It's the real issue there. So I said, you know, the problem is that Trump makes Jimmy Kimmel South Park ANTIFA look good by comparison by the reactions that he has to them, and so that's the real issue here. And he believed that was the case as well, he said. The major theme that came across, he said, I interviewed dozens of protesters in the Capitol Building in Madison, Wisconsin.

The major theme came across was the utter mockery of the government's warnings about antifah and domestic terrorists in general. Are you going to say that we're all enemies within because we don't agree with your policy? Okay, well, that's why they started wearing these I am antifas shirts, is to make fun of Trump saying that anybody that disagrees with him as a domestic terrorist. That's why they were doing that. It's all a boogieman, said one protester about antifah.

This is all fantasy, said another. When I asked protesters about antifah, I expected nervous throat clearing, self censorship. Instead, people just laugh. Many of them even embrace the term, saying that if antiphah means anti fascism, then I am anti faw. So again, this is Antifah is real. I've shown pictures, you know. Mark Hall gave me some pictures because he spent some time in Germany as a lawyer, and he gave me pictures from the nineteen thirties. They

haven't even changed their logo. So you had at the time, you had the Nazis, and then you had the communists organize themselves and the banner and the flag of Antiphah, which is still being used by these people. They haven't even changed it. So it's a very long history of these people who are radical, violent communists that are out there, and these people don't know what that means. And Trump is basically, at least to these people, he's making them

look like victims. They're not victims. They're evil. And that's the problem I have with it. Trump is making people that are doing evil stuff, He's making them look good. They get to stand there with the First Amendment and talk about how they're with the Constitution because Trump is so obviously opposing it. Even the silly costumes, as many explained to me, We're a rejection of the fear that people that felt the federal government's trying to spread anything

from antifa to immigration. What are they going to do arrest the unicorn? Said? One protester said, there's some frogs, there's some lobsters. That's kind of what we were going for. Whimsical fun, they said. Whimsical is a good word for the menagerie of critters and attendance. Most common were frogs, and that was a nod to the costumed frog protester in Portland, Oregon, who became a cause celeb when an ICE officer carefully sprayed tear gas into his costumes air intake.

Opening video of the incident quickly went viral, becoming a symbol of the wanton cruelty of ICE and a shorthand for the national security state's ridiculous fear of seemingly everything gassing a fraud. Really eat too fast? Try to boil that frog turned up to eat with a pepper spray. Well, you know, it's kind of interesting. I think both the left and the right now have frog mascots. They got Peppy the frog on the right, and now these people

have the Portland frog. They got pepper sprayed, pepper spray and peppy.

great thing. My personal favorite was a sign that was worn by a woman identifying as anti faw A U N t I E and a man wearing a sign that said I am Antifa, Come and get me. We are Antifa bees, said one professor, as a group of women who are dressed like bees. Most people don't even know what that means, said another, before be interjected, we don't even know what it means. See that's the point. This isn't realize.

identify as such, we know what we're talking about. They're a communist Marxist radical that will use any means necessary to get their agenda. Passed and getting bogged lence. Yeah, and getting bogged down most of time in a debate of well, what is antifa? Is simply a way of wasting your time from someone who's disingenuous.

and the mass produced signs to crying. The Doge cuts into federal agencies. You see, that was a symbol of its AstroTurf when you had that in the first one, and that's why this one is not. You know, the Republicans are trying to reassure themselves that this is all just paid for by Soros disaster turf. That's why it's different. These people may not know what, but they do know that they don't want to have gangs of massed, armored

federal troops on the ground and their city. Particularly striking this time was seeing people who weren't Republicans but were pissed off at the federal government. See, this used to be what we did. Trump has got everybody doing role reversal. Now now we're cheering the federal government. Now we're cheering

the police state. It used to be that we were upset because Obama was pushing the police state, the militarization of the police, And now the people who did documentaries against that, like Alex Jones, who did four police state documentaries, is now cheering Trump, cheering him in his Latin American wars. Yeah, that's where we've won all of our wars. Let's go have another one so we can win one. It's insane

It's like a sports event to them. So now, these people were not Republicans, but they were angry at the federal government, especially those belonging to the National security apparatus, he said. One protester said, whatever happened to states' rights? He said, this is the kind of stuff that Republicans would always talk about. We never needed it before. We definitely don't need the military deployed now in our states.

We didn't ask for it, said another protester. You can't really make real change except at the state level, he says, For as long as I could remember, states' rights as a concept seemed little more than code for conservatives. And now the conservatives have abandoned this, and they have abandoned the Tenth Amendment as well. Even local law enforcement didn't seem to buy the hype about domestic terror threat posed by anti Vaon. He talks about how relaxed the people were.

So again, when we look at how conservatives have abandoned the idea of what they call states rights, which I always call states powers. They don't have rights, they're not human beings, but they've abandoned that, along with fiscal conservatism, free speech, all the rest of these things. They even make excuses for Trump when he does gun control by executive order. Why because now they are a personality cult following a New York City Democrat who has been corrupt

from the beginning. Increasingly nonpartisan skepticism of the FEDS isn't just an anecdote. It's poll after poll this year showing creating approval, especially among Democrats for institutions like ice, FBI, CIA, the police, even the military. The glib take would be, but they just hate these agencies because Trump is in office. But during his first term, Democrats loved agencies like the FBI. Remember Bob Muller or Daddy Muller as many liberals call him, Well,

Muller time has long since passed. Gone is the liberal undercurrent that the FBI or that uniformed military was going to save the country from Trump. Today these institutions are seen as tools of repression and enemies of free speech, which in fact they are. And now what Trump is doing is he's there to get people to trust these institutions that don't deserve to be trusted. And what I think is funny is that even though he puts in people like cash Betel Dan Bongino and RFK Jr. To

to get you to trust these institutions. Why would anybody trust those guys in the first place. The protest did not have one thing in common with the one in April, or did have one thing in common, and that was frustration with the Democrat Party. One woman said, laughing. They are completely ineffective. It's a joke, said another. Their leadership needs to go. So they're just as upset with the Republican with a Democrat Party as we are with the

Republican Party. That is a joke. The Democrat Party's approval rating is that its lowest in recorded history, with a majority of Democrats wanting its entire leadership to be replaced. No, Kings, wasn't just a protest against Trump, as the mainstream media have lazily asked it. It was a demonstration against a national security neurosis that he is trying and failing to excite, not out of some partisan reflex that's just to support

the Democrats and to oppose Trump. Americans in large part just do not believe that there is an enemy within. And again it's now the Republicans who have a partisan reflex. Is now the Republicans who are abandoning all principles, and Ted Cruz still doesn't get it.

the whole thing. We'll probably get the gist of it if it's really bad. Kind of like the King David thing that was on. Was it Netflix or something? Turned that thing off before we were two minutes into it. This is ridiculous. So anyway, but he did Civil War last year, and he said he thought it was a warning about what can happen in the US if the

country did not confront its growing divisions. Some felt the director was being overloin sensational, but he didn't care he said, I think civil war is just an extension of a situation, and the situation is polarization and the lack of limiting forces on polarization. He said, it's a warning about what could happen when violence erupts between neighbors. And that's what is so dangerous about this. I mean, that's another vector

of this. It's not just violating the Constitution, violating Possecomtists Tattus Act, which was there for a very good reason. You know, Trump is pushing us into a civil war. He compared himself, and we're going to get into that next. He compared himself to Washington and to Lincoln. He thinks he's better than they are. I guess he is. If he can start a war, if he can get the country polarized even before the war starts, like it is right now, you know, if he can push us into

that civil war, I guess he's even better. John Brennan has now been hit with a criminal referral over the Steel Dossier lies. And you know, you look at this, here's this article. Here, look at that. Who's that guy right next to him, James Clapper? What did they not do with James Clapper? They did never, they never came after him for lying to Congress that was a crime.

And I talked about that for the longest time. He did that in twenty thirteen, just about a month or two before we had the snowed documents that leaked out. And Ron Widen, so are you spying on Americans without search warrant? Well, Senator, not intentionally, No, not intentionally, sir. And and I played the clip many times. Michael Hayden went to Washington Lee University and he gave a speech and behind him over his shoulder is like this all seeing eye that they put up as a poster to

advertise his speech. And so Michael Hayden had been the head of the CIA in the NSA, said, I blame Ron Wyden. He knew what we were doing. In other words, he knew we were doing that, spying on people without a warrant, in violation of the Constitution and in violation of the Faiza Act as well. And so he said he knew it, His staff knew it. All those senators and their staff knew that we were doing Why did

he put him on the spot like that? And again he was put on the spot because he had legal jeopardy. He could be charged with lying to Congress, But it is something that is far more important, I think than the line that we're done here. I mean, these guys were lying about the Steel dossier. They were lying about a lot of different things that affected Trump. But I think that and you could argue that that affects all

the people. If you're going to have a criminal organization like the CIA that can go in and operate in terms of soft coups like that, that is important. It needs to be punished, but it needs to be punished as a rule of law, and to help establish the rule of law, maybe we should punish them when they establish coups against the Constitution and against the due process of the Fourth Amendment that can come after us and spy on us without a warrant. Wouldn't that have been

a good thing to do. Now the Republicans are doing it. Why because these guys not because they violate the Constitution. They're doing it because they are enemies of Trump. That's why they're doing this. So this is something that's put out by grandstanding Jim Jordan, who typically doesn't ever do anything. He just holds his committee hearings, And now he's going to come after him for committing perjury. The statute the limitations has expired for James Clapper, that expired in twenty eighteen.

No senator ever filed a criminal referral over James Clapper lining to everybody, even though he was immediately shown to be a liar by the Snowden leaks. But now they have filed a criminal referral again. Jim Jordan, who's doing this?

In a five page referral letter, Jordan argues that Brennan's sworn testimony on May eleventh, twenty twenty three, conflicted with the declassified records that the Committee says that they now show that dossier was not only reviewed by the CIA, but also included via an annex in the Intelligence Committee's assessment. So he said, according to the law eighteen US Code makes it a crime to knowingly willfully make materially false statements to Congress, which is what James Clapper did, and

they never cared. Brennan told lawmakers that the CIA was not involved at all with the dot CIA. However, and in subsequent documents they have now proof that they were. But we were told that they were not spying on people, but then with all the documents that were released by Ed Snowden, we saw that they were and of course we knew that they were interesting that you know, you've had these other liars, because that's what the CIA does.

Remember Mike Kompeo said, I went to West Point. We were told we don't lie, cheater, steal, or support people to do it. And he says, then I went to the CIA. We got classes on doing all that stuff. And I've said many times, and they got classes on coups, they have classes on assassinations, they have classes on how they can start wars. And that's precisely what Gena Haskell did. Trump pointed out when he was running as a candidate

in twenty sixteen. He said the weapons of mass destruction that the Iraq war was based on were all lies. He knew that, and yet he put the woman who brought those lies forward, who got those lies from torturing people illegally, took those lies and sold a war. He made her head of the CIA his entire term. POMPEII was technically the head of the CIA, but she was number two, and she was doing everything there. And then after a couple of years Pompeio steps down and Gina

Haswell becomes a number one. But I think she was running the place the entire time, and so he has supported the woman who not only lied but also lied us into a war and nothing happened to her. James Clapper, who lies about spying on Americans, nothing happened to him. But now they're coming to Brennan. And I'm not playing a whataboutism game. I'm not saying that Brennan needs to get a pass. I'm saying it's disgusting that they haven't

done any of this stuff before. And I think that although he needs to be punished for this, that this is very minor compared to what Gina Haspital lied about. It's very minor compared to even what James Clapper led about. And it's not being done as a way to establish a rule of law. It's not being done to abolish the CIA, which is what really should happen. It's being done to show that you don't mess with Trump. That's

the purpose of this exercise. Jordan claims that Brennan personally overruled CIA analysts who raised concerns about the dossier's reliability, quoting an internal exchange attributed Brennan, which he allegedly said, yes, but doesn't it ring true? Doesn't this feel true? According to Brennan, my bottom line is that I believe the

information warrants inclusion in the report. The referral calls Brennan's lies material and part of a pattern of Brennan's willingness to lie to Congress, pointing to Brennan's earlier twenty seventeen House Intelligence Committee appearance in which he said the dossier was not in any way used in the Intelligence community's assessment. And so throughout this article they referred to that the Intelligence community's assessment that is called the ICA. So the

CIA had an ICA. I think that's humorous, that the Intelligence community assessment. In his part, Brennan was consistently defending the ICA's core conclusion that Moscow intervened in twenty sixteen. Ultimately, according to the documents declassified by the Trump administration, the decision to incorporate information from the Steele, DOTSA and the ICA was jointly made by the directors of the CIA and the FBI. And again, they should go to jail. They should go to jail for perjury. They should go

to jail for trying to do a soft coup. But I think lying us into the Iraq War was a bigger crime, and I know that Trump rewarded her for doing that, made her head of the CIA. And when we look at the fact that the whole reason we have the FISA Act is because the CIA and the NSA from their inception, have been illegally spying on Americans.

That was the key thing about the Church Committee hearings. Instead, what they made it about was the heart attack, guns and the attempted assassinations and all the coups that they had done. But quite frankly, all of that was wrong and it should be punished, but especially the violation of the Constitution in terms of spying on Americans. They came

up with the FIS Act. They used the fires Act then to give themselves legal cover to do whatever they wished to spy on mister and missus Verizon, as Ran Paul put it so the House Judiciary Committee Jim Jordan so now referring CIA Director John Brennan to the Department of Justice for perjury prosecution. Brendan falsely denied, says Jonathan Turley.

He's got three lives that he breaks down. Line number one, Brendan falsely denied that the CIA relied on the discredited Steele dossier and drafting the post election Intelligence Community Assessment. So I guess that's a much bigger deal than lying as to the Iraq war or telling us that they're not spying on all Americans. Line number two worse. Still, under questioning from Jordan, Brennan said, the CIA opposed including

the dossier into the assessment, but they didn't. And here's the third big lie that they want to put him in jail for. During an Intelligence Committee hearing in May two thousand and seven, Jordan alledged that Brennan falsely asserted that the Steele dossier was not in any way used on as a basis for the Intelligence Committee assessment that was done. Trey Gowdy, another grand Standard, elicited the perjuris statement in his questioning. And so those are the three lies.

And again I ask you, you know, yes he should go to jail for that. I'm not playing what about isn't I'm just saying, can't we get rid of the CIA? And I say it's just and these people are such crooks and we need to do this in a way that re establishes the rule of law rather than the power of Trump. So Switzerland has gone to war against free speech. And it was just a week or two ago that in a referendum you had slightly more than fifty percent of the people voted to have digital ID

in Switzerland. Switzerland has, like everyone else, lost its way. A man was jailed for claiming that skeletons reveal your gender, which is a fact. This has been a fact for a very long time. And so because he said that, the Swiss government is sending him to jail because that was hate speech directed against LGBT. When it comes to free speech, Switzerland has declared war on anyone who challenges

certain orthodox positions, including gender policies rights Jonathan Early. This guy, Emmanuel brunus Holtz is about to start a ten day prison stent due to his voice in skepticism about claims that skeletons are transgender. There's very little coverage of the story. Free speech cases are often downplayed by European media, so we only have limited information coming from a few conservative sides,

he said. In twenty twenty two, he responded to a Facebook post by the Swiss National Council member on the controversy, Some including academics in the US, are now claiming that you can really cannot gauze the sects of individuals from the skeletons, but you can the wind instrument repair man.

That's what he did. He repaired wind instruments. Thought that such claims were unfounded, and he posted a comment that said, if you dig up LGBT people after two hundred years, you will only find men and women based on their skeletons. Everything else is mental illness promoted through school curriculum. So brunus Holtz then received a knock on his door from the police and a prosecution letter for engaging in hate speech and for quote publicly belittling unquote comments made based

on sexual orientation. Under the Swiss Criminal Code. He was convicted and fined five hundred Swiss Francs court actually convicted him, then another court upheld the conviction. He was ordered to pay a fine or go to jail. He refused to pay the fine, so now he is going to jail simply for expressing his views, which by the way, are true. This is when government censors information. It's typically true information, true information that they want to lie to you about

censorship is violence, censorship is lies. He's now going to jail for simply expressing his view, and.

speech platform that's been enforced for years by the European Union. Well, it's been enforced as well by Israel. Here in the United States. They want to shut down any speech that they don't want heard, and typically it's because of speech is true. If it was not true, would be easy for them to push back against it and to disprove it. Nevertheless, he said, I mean a few brave people of free speech advocates and groups still struggling to restore this indispensable

right to their countries. By going to jail, brunus Holtz is bringing needed attention to the crackdown on free speech in that country. Despite the disgraceful role of the courts in this effort, citizens like brunus Holt show but the cause of free speech is still alive in Europe. It will come back eventually. It may get really, really dark, and it may last. The darkness may last for a very long time, but eventually people are going to want to be free. That is the human spirit, and that

is what these people are so against. It's why we look could be a skinner of the name of his book was Beyond Freedom and Dignity. People don't want to be treated like animals. They may be able to get away with this for seventy or eighty years or even longer, but eventually people will rise up and revolution against this attack on our freedom and dignity. So what have we got here, Travis?

of it. But there's other things. There's the financial records where they could find people that were paying Jeffrey Epstein that would indicate that they're being blackmailed, and those would be the people that would be involved in raping these women, and that needs to be investigated. But the fact they want to shut this all down just shows you that Trump is not only personally involved, but he is protecting the people who are in the club with him, just

like he's protecting Javier Malay. He will suffer all kinds of criticism, and he knows what he's doing to the farmers, and he knows it's going to get people upset. But he's doing everything he can to help Haviar Malai doing nothing for the American farmers, and he's willing to weather that criticism because Haavey Malai is one of his friends. They're in the club together, the club that you're not in.

just these no Kings protests. There's no good people involved now, the leftists, if they were to gain power, if they were to indulge their fantasies and whims like the right is right now, it'd be far worse. Just it's important to remember these people are not your friends. If you support them, they will knife you in the back instantaneously.

Don't tell me that the Bar family doesn't have some connection to this stuff either, because then as soon as Bill Barr, who again was George HW. Bush's right hand man and rebuilding the CIA after the church hearings had damaged their reputation and so forth, he was his right hand man at the CIA, and Bush made him the youngest attorney general. Then Trump makes some attorney general again and he starts doing all kinds of CIA stuff like we we've got to get rid of this Epstein guy

one way or the other. And so before you know it, Epstein's back in jail, and before you know it, he's been suicided. According to them, whatever happened.

You should erase them from existence. Not a chance of oh well i'm Antifa. No, you need to make if you're going to do this. I'm not advocating saying they should, but he if he's going to do it, he should at least go no half measures.

responding to his son of the Lord. After everything Trump gave them in twenty twenty, you'd think they'd have built shrines and statues dedicated to him by now.

to just keep recycling over and over again. You got some guy who used to be some super soldier or whatever. Now he's retired for a quiet life, but somebody's kidnapped his daughter and he's going to make them pay, and he's going to take out the entire organization. It's just a pretense for violence and revenge and all the rest of the stuff. And I'm sick of the violence and the revenge. I'm sick of all of this stuff that Hollywood glorifies and makes movies out of. I don't want

to spend my time watching. And I think it's ugly. And it's just like the monster movies. So as a kid, the monster movies or things like slow moving Mummy with one arm and he's dragging a leg, but he's always able to catch everybody, right, And you had, you know, Frankenstein and dragging the wolf Man, and those were fun because they were.

They started doing the movies from the slasher's perspective, and you know, long ago I got rid of the horror stuff, and I don't like to see even action films anymore because they all fall into that category, or they fall into the category of you know, we got a just war here, and we're gonna go, you know, kill a

bunch of people. And I just I'm sick and tired of the killing and of the violence and the stuff that's being sold to us by Hollywood, and it's all just a pretense to have that, and they just keep recycling these same stories again. So I'm might whether they have something that looks like a beautiful painting that's going on. If I happened to catch it and it's got some nice music in the background, I don't even care about the plot of Yeah, I don't even care about the

plot of Pride and Prejudice. I just listened to the music that's there.

think should even be a crime. He made withdrawals, and he did it in a way to avoid attention from the bank. They sent him to jail for that, not for being a pedophile. And again, if they wanted to fix it, they could easily. They could remove the statute of limitations for pedophilia, which is incredibly and ridiculously short. In most cases, it's only like two or three years. And the kids just can't even come to terms with it in that amount of time. So again, you know, yeah,

send him to jail. Just we know that if he was part of that criminal intelligence agency, they's got a long rap sheet that people don't even know about.

that Civil War was a good movie. I've been burned by A twenty four before, but from what I've seen, it seems to be the best movie they've produced, unless there's something.

amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful. I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various.

the people who control our bipartisan system. They're going to have militarized police forces going to be robotic.

Show is a great way to support us. Another great way is through our sponsors. Homestead Products dot Shop is our newest sponsor. They're currently having a sale on their organic juniper salve. You can go to Homestead Products dot shop and if you search juniper, they have three different options. What's on sale right now is the juniper salve. It's good for your skin. It has some antimicrobial properties, help skin healing and that.

do it naturally and organically. The way they put it through there so that you can get to the unmasked and unadulterated aspects of these different natural products that God has put out there.

being there on site, I think we're valid observations. Ted Cruz is begging the GOP to take quote the political peril seriously. Well, I think the problem is that the peril is more than just political. All they care about is the politics. All they care about is staying in office, and that is a real key problem of this two party system, as MTG was pointing out. But the real peril is this militarized peril of a federal militarized police, and we should take that seriously, and they should also

take seriously the frustration that people have with that. But the GOP and the Nudge News and the MAGA influencers are basically I kind of break it down in four different narratives that they got about this. Number one, don't worry about it. They just hate Trump, and these people are just crazy. They're crazy. They're a bunch of old boomers. That's number two. They're a bunch of old boomers and hippies. Or this is all AstroTurf. It's all being paid for

by Soros. As he pointed out, there's a very different situation. There's a bunch of professionally printed, pre printed signs that were handed out at previous note King's rally. This one was different. People are making up their own signs, and they're making up signs that they knew what they were

talking about. They knew about Trump's executive order about label people domestic terrorists, and then of course you know the label of joining in with Trump, and just all these people who oppose this, they're all just a bunch of communists and anti vas So we can just dismiss them. And if the police run their car into the crowd, I voted for that. That's the usual thing that we

see from these people. So I think the problem is is that the Conservatives, in terms of selling this police brutality, in terms of selling an armed, massed federal police force. It doesn't feel like it has to obey the law, doesn't need to identify itself, for get a search warrant. Once they do that, folks, they are selling the rope that will hang them and us. That's the reality. And we'll be hung by the next killery that comes to

office because they will have established this precedent. You know, it was Obama who said that we were She called us deplorable. He said, we're bitter clingers. Trump called us non essential. D see the bipartisan aspect of this, and so there was a good up ed piece an American reformer by timon Klein, and he said, if you can keep what what is a republic? And he says, you know,

we all know the quote about Benjamin Franklin. When they came out of the Constitutional Convention, an aged, gout ridden Benjamin Franklin was asked by a woman, Miss Elizabeth Powell of Philadelphia, what do we got a republic? A republic or monarchy? And he said a republic if you can keep it right. So what is it that is a republic?

He said. Franklin just finished his final address for the convention, given his ill health, he had James Wilson had to read it for him, and the speech was a recitation of Polybius. So the new nation was not immune to regime cycles, It was not immune to a law of history, and it would end in despotism if the people ever fail all to maintain requisite virtue. Oh do we ever talk about that? All we have? We don't have virtue in our country. Of course, as we get to it

is when people virtue signal, isn't it? A licentious people is the strong chastening hand of despotism. It's what's the solution to a licentious people? And what does he mean by that? You know, we typically think of licentious. We typically think of people like trumpet Epstein who out they're conducting, you know, sexual licentiousness, But they also meant by licentious, they meant just any kind of profligate behavior. You know, it could be licentious spending, right, It doesn't necessarily have

to have a sexual connotation with it. But we have just become a soft people who don't care about virtue, who don't care about responsibility, and don't want any consequences. But the consequence when you have a licentious people, the consequence is always going to be despotism, and that's what we're starting to see now. So Franklin was not very confident in his fellow Americans. He was not a believer

in American exceptionalism. For Franklin, republic did refer to a form of government he never although he never used the word in his speech, but it was clearly entailed more than mere constitutional structure and procedure. John Adams spoke more about it. He said that the only good government is republican, and a republic is an empire of laws, not an

empire of men. And this is what concerns me. We've had a lot of rubicons that have been crossed already, but this is a big rubicon when we just dispense with the rule of law, and we dispense with all of these different branches of government that were meant to check and counterbalance each other, and we put all power in the presidency and allowed Trump to rule by eating

whenever he puts out. First, puts out an edict of a emergency, which is now just a formality backed up by a lie, and then he issues his executive orders as dictates. So he said, the best form of government is one that is contrived to secure an impartial and exact execution of laws. Some why of these people swear to a public constitution as a condition of their office? So Adams said, virtue and simplicity of manners are indispensably necessary in a republic among all orders and degrees of men.

But there is so much rascality, so much venality, and so much corruption, so much avarice and ambition, that I sometimes doubt whether there is public virtue enough to support a republic. He said, there's two vices that are most detectably predominant in every part of America that I've yet seen, which are incompatible with a republic. And those two things,

he said, are civility and flattery. Why would he pick that, Well, because he's in politics, and because in their day they had people like Mike Johnson as well, who are servile flatterers. And that's what the GOP has become. And that's a sad thing to witness, but it's not unexpected when you have a when the people have turned into a personality cult around someone who has no virtue that we can identify.

I can't see any virtue in any aspect of Trump's life, whether it is profligate sexual activity or profligate spending activity, and of course his inability to be able to control himself. He doesn't have any insights, He has no principles. The great fear of Adams was that that America lacked kings actually,

or as Carlile Carlisle would call them, able men. So they talk about a king as being somebody who had a kind of He means that in this sense, is somebody who was someone that you would look up to, that you would respect, someone of virtue. And that's why you know, when people look at America, we don't have anyone who is up to the job of being a king. Dewy. Trump has demanded the two hundred thirty million dollars for this Russian witch hunt, which I think, in and of itself,

says so much about his character. It truly is amazing. And he doesn't, as I said before, he doesn't just have an enemy's list like Nixon did. He's actually got a formal public committee to go after his enemies that he's made a list of the Reuters, says The Exclusive. A wide ranging group of US officials is pursuing Trump's fight against his enemies against what he calls his deep state. And yet the deep state, I think we now have a definition for it. It's anybody that is a personal

enemy of Trump. A group of dozens of officials from across the federal government, including US intelligence officers, has been helping to steer Trump's dry for retribution against his perceived enemies, according to the government records and a source familiar with the effort. Yeah, I've said so many times. I'll say it again. It's the law that should be powerful, not Trump. It's the law that should be strengthened, not Trump. But that's the purpose of him going after his enemies. And

it is called the inter Agency Weaponization Working Group. It's drawn from officials at the White House, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the CIA, the Justice and Defense Departments, the FBI, Homeland Security, the IRS, and the FCC. Because he's got to go after programs that he doesn't like either, right. Pam Bondy and Director of National Intelligence Tulsea Gabbart earlier this year announced groups within their organizations that would be doing this. But now they have a

large conspiracy to go after Trump's enemies. I think that is incredibly dangerous. It's incredibly unconstitutional, and it is where we are at this very dangerous time. Let's talk a little bit about what's going on in terms of the Venezuelan War and the peace prize that he would like to get. Tucker Carlson got very upset when he was at a Turning Point USA event. He was a speaker that was on the chair answering questions from the audience like Charlie Kirk would do, and he had a guy

get up and ask him some questions. And I'll play that for you here by the way, looking at the time here, we're going to have Tony's going to join us tomorrow. I'm sure a lot of you were expecting Tony to join us at ten thirty. We've got a couple of interviews tomorrow, and Charlie is going to be with us tomorrow on the show. But here's Tucker Carlson at the Turning Point event and he gets asked a question by a student about what is going on and have things really improved under Trump?

voted for Donald Trump in the first place. And you know, no pointless wars was not just a thing he said at one campaign stop. It was a pillar of his campaigns and of MAGA itself. I mean, what is MAGA. There's a mad scramble, particularly since Charlie's passing, to define what this is and to read some people out of the movement.

do we bring back jobs? And is that the role of government? I think the role of government is what we should be looking at. Instead of saying, bring back jobs, Let's say let's get rid of government opposition to the free market. Let's get rid of government obstacles to people being able to conduct business freely and unfettered. That's the reality.

This government regulation that is our biggest problem. And again, as the government all always does when it creates the problem, when it is the problem, it points to somebody in a foreign country, it says, they're your problem. And it's really more than anything else, it's government regulations that are shutting down our society, making it so that we can't

get jobs and the rest of this. But Glenn Greenwall responding to the beginning of that question, he said, it's basically guaranteed that if you do a Q and A with young MAGA types, they will voice their anger that the US continues to finance Israel and wars like Ukraine, just as we saw in last night's TPUSA. He said, the issue is generationally lost for the bipartisan DC class,

and he's right about that. And I thought it was interesting that Tucker got angry about the guy mentioning that his dad worked for the CIA, but he didn't say that his dad did not work for the CIA. He said he was a great guy. Whatever he did for a living, Yeah, it was so.

Tucker fielded questions from liberals and conservatives regarding a variety of controversial subjects, including abortion and Trump at Indiana University, and when it got on the topic of the CIA again, he says, you know, whatever he did for a living, well, I guess you know when we look at that, if you create lies and narratives to support the people who do these types of things, even if you're not doing it,

I think you have some culpability for that. His father ran Voice of America as director of Voice of America during the Reagan years, and of course he was made an ambassador by George H. W. Bush. There is no evidence, says The Daily Mail, that his father was ever employed by the CIA, although Tucker has said in previous interviews that his father quote worked in conjunction with the agency at some point in his career, and Tucker did not deny it. He just said, you know, whatever he did.

Tucker himself, of course, applied to the CIA was rejected. I guess they figured that he'd be far more use in mainstream media selling their lives, which he did until he got fired by Fox, he would not push back against the pandemic or the vaccine, and he sold their lives about nine to eleven for the longest time. Now he's going to make some kind of a nine to eleven documentary to try to redeem himself. I guess what.

just I see Buckley. The Buckley that I think of is William F. Buckley, who was an apologist for the CIA ran National Review and came after the John Birch Society. It's not something that I would that would kind of contaminate that name as far as I was concerned, unless I was a fan of the CIA, which I am not well. Trump also said that he's got Lincoln and Washington beat as president, that he had this to say.

a lie, and I'm really good at that. I'm the best. Nobody better than me.

would have to be behind Washington. But then he dropped his most famous lie about ending eight wars, and again several wars that he claims to have ended, including the DRC in Rwanda conflict and the Israel Hamas conflict still erupt in violence, and the other quote unquote wars such as Serbia, Kosovo, Egypt and Ethiopia were never wars in the first place, and when you look at the one with Armenia Azerbaijan, he was one of the officials from one of those two countries was openly caught on a

hot mic laughing about Trump, claiming that he had made peace there and so they're mocking him for that. The Rose Garden speech was intended to celebrate the demolition of the White House East Wing to make room for his massive two hundred million dollar ballroom, before evolving into embellishments about his accomplishments and his attacks on his enemies. You know he's going to get He's going to write himself

a check for more than that grand ballroom is costing. Right, He's going to write himself a check for two hundred and thirty million dollars. He is. I guess you call him a fabuloust, right. He not just doesn't tell lies, but he tells grand lies and grand fables. I guess that's one of the things that got him to commute the sentence of George Santos. I guess he can identify with that guy, just like he's looking at commuting the sentence of the Diddler what was his name, P Diddy? Yeah,

p Diddy, Yeah again. You know, he identifies with these sexual predators, sexual predators like Diddy and Maxwell, so probably give them some pardons as well, just like he identifies with the grand liar George Santos. So. Trump is beating the drums of war for direct action in Venezuela. A lot of people are talking about this, and Rand Paul

is saying quite a bit about this as well. He's been very vocal in his opposition to it, and it has drawn the ire, of course of Donald Trump, because we can see that he has already committed to this war, and he's openly talking about the fact that he has done a CIA finding and going to apply the CIA to Venezuela. As one person who used to work for the CIA said, you don't typically talk about that because

a it puts the CIA people in danger. And number two, they won't always have plausible deniability doing everything in secret. They want to not have that pointed to them. But this is what Rampaul had to say about Trump in Venezuela.

you kill people indiscriminately when you were at war. That's why when we declare war, it's supposed to be done by Congress. It's supposed to be thoughtful, it's supposed to be debated, and we're not supposed to do it willy nilly. And then when you have war, you just kill people in the war zone, and even then there are rules

of engagement. But interdicting drugs has always been a criminal activity, in a criminal, anti crime sort of activity, where we don't just summarily execute people, we actually present evidence and convict them.

a human being. They've already dehumanized you to a large degree if they can just take your property on a whim. And so it's just a kind of a logical progression really that if you can take people's property, at some point you're going to say that I can do the equivalent of civilizset forfeiture with their life. You're going to forfeit your life if you're doing something that I even suspect is an issue. And again, the reason that they steal this property and don't charge people of the crime

is because it's done on suspicion. They know that they don't that a crime wasn't committed, or they know that they don't have evidence that they could convict somebody, so they go ahead and punish them without doing that. We've operated under these systems of mil Tri's police, no knock raids and the civiliseet forfeiture for so long, we've been conditioned to accept the next step in this. And that's why I see people that are out there saying, great,

I voted for this, That's right, you did. You should be ashamed of yourself. You don't even have the integrity to be ashamed. So Rand Paul said, well, Trump didn't invite me to the GOP lunch, and this is happening, I guess because he's speaking against Trump just murdering people. And that's what this is, is simply murder. It's a crime.

The Trump gang, well, the Trump gang invaded Kentucky. Next because he put up on X he posted a picture of him setting with Thomas Massey, who Trump also hates because Massey has opposed his profligate spending and has opposed his wars. And so Paul and Massey, both of them from Kentucky said. Paul said, I actually wasn't invited to the White House lunch today, but that's okay, he said. Instead,

we're having a Liberty Caucus lunch. Thomas Massey and I and Trump posted Republican senators in the Rose Garden that's where he was speaking, to express his appreciation after the chamber advanced dozens of nominees and to present a united front. As the government shut down drags and it's fourth week. At one point, Trump marveled at the audience, he said, noting that only one senator was not there. He didn't name the senator, but he said, we're just missing one person.

You'll never guess who that is. He automatically votes know on everything he thinks it's good politics. It's not good politics. Well, yeah, you should just rubber stamp whatever Trump wants to do. If you want to be successful in politics. That's the way you get ahead in the Republican Party. You just rubber stamp everything that comes from Trump. Well, ram Paul has said many things. He said, it is a recipe

for chaos. After being called by Trump a nasty little guy, ram Paul responded to Trump's nasty little guy insult by doubling down in his position about the administration breaking the law where their strikes alleged drug smuggling votes in the Caribbean. He was on with Puer Morgan. As you saw, he said, I enjoy the President's company and personality despite our personal the personal insults, He said, I don't take it too seriously. I've known Trump for over a decade. I've played golf

with them a couple dozen times. I actually enjoy his company and his personality most of the time. But it doesn't mean that I'm going to be a rubber stamp or agree with everything. He blasted his own party and argued that he received pushback on things that shouldn't be considered to be weird, like passing a balanced budget and reducing the debt. Paul argued that there's no legal basis for the president's strikes. He called it a summary execution

without legal process. We don't blow butt boats off of the coast of Miami because twenty five percent of the time suspicion is wrong, and we shouldn't do that in Venezuela either, As he pointed out, I mentioned it yesterday. He said that when the Coastguard does stop people and inspected me, he said, twenty five percent of the time those that they suspect of being of smuggling drugs or

not smuggling drugs. So if we're just going to blow up every large boat that has a big engine on it and say that's a drug drug runner, then twenty five percent of the time we're going to be killing innocent people. He said, We're not at war, so this is just a summary execution. As he pointed out, these small boats outboard motor boats are two thousand miles away from the US. They would have to refuel, as he pointed out twenty times, in order to get there. He goes,

this is just summary execution. Everyone gets a trial because sometimes the system gets it wrong. Even the worst of the worst in our country get due process. The bottom line is that execution without process is not justice. Blowing up foreign ships is a recipe for chaos, and it is a recipe for training your government that they don't have to follow the law. And we've been doing that on a variety of issues for my entire life. And this is getting worse and worse. It's like a metastasizing cancer.

Trump slammed Paul as a nasty little guy. I said, whatever happened to Senator Rampaul? He was never great, but he went really bad. I got him elected twice. Well, actually, that's a patently absurd lie. Ram Paul was already a senator when he was running for president in twenty sixteen against Trump, and Trump knows that Trump didn't get him

elected prior to twenty sixteen. So he's a nasty little guy, much like Congressman Thomas Massey, also known as Ram Paul Junior, also of Kentucky, which I won three times in massive landslides. Sick wackos refused to vote for our great Republican Party. Blah blah blah. It's pathetic. And yet we've had yet another vote blown up again. This one was in the Pacific. It killed two people, and the lead from WND disgusted me because what they did was they took some of

the quotes that people had on social media. One of them said, yeah, all those outboard motors on that boat. I guess these quote unquote fishermen have to do that because they're going after the really fast fish. That's what this is. Not about that, And it is so petty and so typical of the kind of rhetoric that we've seen from the left when they talk about, well, you don't need to have a gun that has that many bullets at it, right, you don't need a magazine of

that size. Are you that bat of shot when you go deer hunting that you got to shoot up everything inside? No, it's not about that. They'll also say, well, you don't need an AR fifteen to go hunting and so forth. Well you don't need to have a speedboat to be out on the ocean. And if the government, the US government blows you up in a speedboat, you deserve it. You probably were a criminal because you had a boat with too many engines on it, just like you're a

criminal if you've got a certain type of gun. Right, So, Worst Secretary Pete Hegseth posted the video of the exploding boat. This is the thing that I find so amazing. These people are committing crimes, crimes as defined by our own government and constitution, and crimes as defined by international law, and yet they boast about it. They put it out on social media. And you know, when I look at Pete heiseth. There was an article that had him was

talking about him in Christian nationalism. He's become the face of Christian nationalism for the left, and they were talking about the fact that he was there with Doug Wilson, who I interviewed Doug Wilson once over a book that was published by Canon Pressed. I thought was really good. I got him on to talk about the book. But you know, I like what Doug Wilson does in the sense of politics and religion. He challenges these assumptions, these false assumptions that say that we're going to have a

values neutral society. You can't have that. It's going to be somebody's values. And he's very good at pointing that out. And he will say provocative things in order to challenge the left, but he does it with humor and he backs it up in an argument. Is not what Pete Hegseth is doing. And you know the unfortunate thing is I told Karen when I saw the article, I said, this is going to be it was about Christian nationalism and Pete Hegseth, I said, this is going to be

about Doug Wilson. Sure enough, pull up the article. The first two words are Doug Wilson. You're gonna be careful who you align yourself with, because the problem is is that what Pete Hegseth is doing is not Christian. It

may be nationalism, but it is not Christian. This kind of blowing people out of the water without any kind of justification is unjustified, and it is not obeying his oath to the law, and it is not what Christians should support, and unfortunately, you know, he's going to have that albatross of what Pete Hegseth is doing because of the connection that's there at a church that's in Washington. So this person from I think it was from the Atlantic went to the church because it was being planted

by some people who were affiliated with Doug Wilson. They put a church in Washington, and Pete Headseth was part of getting that move there, and they went there to see what was being talked about as well as to try to talk to Pete Hegseth, but they were not allowed to talk to him. But anyway, she goes off on this whole rant about what Doug Wilson is about and got a lot of it wrong, and people are

going to get the wrong impression about this. It's just like they're getting the wrong impression about antiphab because Trump what Trump is saying about it. They get the wrong impression about what Christianity is about as well because of the actions of people who are saying I'm for Christian nationalism.

This vessel was quote known by our intelligence said heg Seth to be involved in illicit narcotics smuggling, was transiting along a known narco trafficking transit out and carrying narcotics, Well, this would be the type of thing they'd get you pulled over that kind of profiling. And as ram Paul pointed out, when we do that, twenty five percent of the time were wrong and so it wasn't known because

you didn't have due process. That's one of the things that ram Paul said was that if you're going to kill somebody, you've got to at least know their name. If you don't even know their name, how can you know the facts that they have broken a law. And I have to say, the people who are cheering all this stuff, even if these people were known to be smuggling these drugs, they are still entitled to due process.

How would you feel if the coastguard pulls over a boat, searches it, finds some drug contraband and just lines everybody up on the side of the boat and machine guns. Would that be justified. So they don't even go that far in this and these people are cheering it, shame on them. Marco Rubia on Wednesday voice support for the action, saying bottom line, these are drug boats. If people want to stop seeing drug boats blown up, then stop sending

drugs to the US. This is this is eight year old type of rhetoric that's coming out of these people. And so then WND started posting the comments that were on x Why do all these peaceful, simple fishermen have sixty thousand dollars plus and motors on their fishing boats. That is clearly a bunch of poor fishermen just trying to feed their families. Seriously, everyone knows that you need

three outboard motors to catch the really fast fish. Why do we have a government that can do whatever it wishes and you think that it's not going to do that to you At some point in time, you never know if we're going to set up a system of declaring anybody that we point the finger at and say you are a domestic terrorist. Now I can execute you. So the same thing that Trump is doing when he says we've got an emergency. We've got an emergency about trade,

we've got an emergency about co it. Now I can do anything I want. They can say we got an emergency, and I'm going to designate who the terrorists are. Oh, by the way, that's you. Now, I've been put on too many lists by the government by both Democrats and Republicans to not realize what this is about. And these fools who voted for this, who are cheering this kind of stuff, were involved with January the sixth, or they at least saw innocent people getting swept up in that

January the sixth stuff. They pointed to them and said, you're a domestic terrorist. This was an insurrection. Those are false. You should never take this stuff at face value. We have to have restrictions on the government and a shame on WND for pushing this kind of stuff. So congrats, bro, we get it. You are killing random people without evidence of a crime, and then you're posting the kill cam as if it's a highlight reel. Said another, This administration

is not one of peace. It is a typical regime change administration looking out for the neocons. Well, I agree with that comment. You're going to provide any evidence, arrest and try them like civilized countries do, or you're just going to kill whoever you please, same as every other warmongering regime in the American Empire. That's right, but then you have the people say keep going. Americans voted for this.

I voted for this. They say, well, even if you were carrying drugs, even if they went through the due process and convicted them, there is no death penalty for that. There's only one drug associated death penalty that's there, and it has never been used by the federal government, and it's not for this kind of activity. So all of this is a phony war. All of this is as phony as the Canadian fentanyl epidemic that we were told.

And of course you had people like Jack by Soviet who went to the Order, who went to this quiet little town at the border of the US and Canada, said, look, you know, there's no police dogs, there's no fence here. Anybody can walk anywhere they want to go in that horrible We've got freedom, We've got freedom for Canadians and Americans.

How could we ever tolerate something like that? Jack? But Soviet is another one of these people like Tucker Carlson, who's been heavily involved in the intelligence community and been groomed and promoted by Alex Jones to become a large figure in his own right. So Trump has unleashed the CIA in Venezuela, now authorizing the CIA for direct operation inside of the country, a Freethought Project has a Phillip Garaldy, who used to be with the CIA, talks about how

surprising it is to see this being done openly. Usually everything is a secret, you know, national security. That's why they created this kind of stuff. They created the veil of national security so they could do criminal, unethical, illegal things and not have to and hide it from people. It's always been about that. So Coumban administration is ramping up their military presence near Venezuela with bombers, navy warships, nuclear submarine. This is about going in and taking over

the country. A bipartisan bill in the Senate would block Trump from going to war with Nezuela. This is introduced by Senators Ran Paul, Tim Kaine, and Adam Schiff. That's going to get Trump really angry. That's why Rand Paul was not He's got a bill to stop his war, and he did it with Adam Schiff. Again, Trump is

making the worst of the worst. Look good, Tim Kain, the Hillary Clinton running mate, and Adam Schiff, of all things, require congressional authorization before the US went to war with Venezuela, which is the right thing to do. So South American's kine.

Americans don't want to send there. This is Tim Kaine statement, Americans don't want to send their sons and daughters into more wars, especially wars that carry a serious risk of significant destabilization and of massive new waves of migration into our hemisphere. Well, that's another way to look at it. You go into war torn Venezuela, what's going to be the next thing. You're going to wind up having the country flooded with Venezuela and refugees that we have created.

Paul said that the American people do not want to be dragged into endless war with Venezuela without public debate or vote. We had to defend what the Constitution demands deliberation before war. The resolution was introduced on October seventeen will force a vote within ten days, meaning that it could happen as early as next week. What is that

like next Tuesday, twenty seventh. Americans can contact their senators and urge them to support it is Senate Joint Resolution SJ Resolution ninety SJ Resolution ninety if you call him and ask him to support that. The bill comes as US continues escalating its military campaign in the Caribbean by bombing even more alleged boats drug running votes. Earlier this month, Theate voted on a bill that would have prevented more US strikes on boats without congressional approval, but it failed

by a vote of forty eight to fifty one. Paul was only one of two Republicans who supported the measure, as he has been very critical of the bombing campaign. He said this week that the extra judicial executions at sea quote go against all of our tradition. You really need to know someone's name, at least you need to have to accuse them of something. As I said before, this is the civil asset forfeiture of life, because you don't have to know somebody's name or accuse them of

anything to steal their property. Under the drug war, well, I guess now we've reached the point where you can take their life without knowing their name or accusing them of any wrongdoing, let alone convicting them of it. And even if you were to convict them of it, there is no law that says we get to kill people for that. So Free Thought Project says, brace yourself. There is another regime change war that is coming, and all this is happening. Well, Trump the most double minded person

I've ever seen in history. He's boasting about this Venezuelan action, threatening anybody who opposes them. At the same time he keeps talking about getting the Nobel Peace Prize. It's the strangest thing that is. He's an absolute idiot, comments Jim's seven.

Giant Monsters. You can't go wrong, lots of fun, Pacific Rim, great movie.

knows that. That's why he's doing his lawfare against New York Times against Wall Street Journal. But I think he's going to get his comeuppance in those two because they're gonna they've got the money to fight him on this, and he doesn't have a leg to stand on. It's just the same kind of political persecution that he suffered unfairly, and he's now going to do that to other people. This is why we keep spiraling down as a society. Everybody does this, what about ism, It's just well, they

did it, so now we're going to do it. So we're going to take that precedent and we're going to build on it. And it's just constantly spiraling and ratcheting down.

in the middle. There's very few of us, you see. The problem is one of the main issues is the other side does need to be punished. So I'm of the opinion personally, yeah, the left does need a spanking, Like we need to take these people out back and give them a little bit of a whooping and be like, you don't get to do this again. No more industrial murder of babies, no more trans in kids. And if you try this again, there's gonna be some serious consequences.

You don't just get to murder, you know, a few million babies and go all right, we can be friends. We can we'll put it beside us. No, No, it.

don't have a time machine. It's back to the future.

most issues. Just like with a drug war, it wouldn't be nice if we could just prohibit these drugs and make them go away, but it doesn't work that way. The real world does not work that way. You can't put an edict out there and say, well, I don't like guns, so we're just gonna make all the guns vanish. Now, none of that stuff works. All of these and tractical problems that we have, whether it's drug addiction or what's happening with AI and these other things, they are all

spiritual problems. And if we have lost our connection to what is virtually to what is, and we don't care about virtue, we don't care about a standard of morality, and we have thrown God out of our country and out of our institutions, there isn't going to be any way that we're going to save it. With a government that is going to come in with guns drawn, that's just going to add to the problem son of.

as you're not on board with this? Did he criticize it and they gave him an option to resign quietly and they wouldn't make a big deal out of it. I don't know.

like that would be real. And so you know, they're going to do all the right things and be model citizens until that day they want to turn them into saboteurs.

And that's the way the controlled opposition stuff works. That's why when people say, well, look at all the stuff that he told us that was true, and look at how he woke me up and all the rest of stuff, and it's like yeah, and then what do you do when the chips were down in twenty twenty, when they really brought this thing in and the other shoe for the police surveillance state dropped. What did he do then? Maybe that was his purpose to gain your trust so

he could stab you in the back. He'd get behind you so I could stamby in the back.

day the common man. They created common Core and dumbed down our children. They created common past, track and control us. They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away.

Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com