Thr 2May24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show. As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday, the second of May. You're of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we are going to go back and take a look at more of the campus wars which continue to go on, because it's very important for us to see what this is about. It's not about what it's about actually, the thing that they put up

there at the front, it's not about that at all. It's going to change a lot of things, and perhaps it may be used for good. It appears to be a lot of pushback that is coming forward with it. We're also going to take a look at some of the vaccine stuff that is really starting to explode in other countries. Not here here, we're too busy cheering for Trump or Biden to care about the many millions of people that they killed, But in other countries it's now being exposed. And we're going to

have some updates on some of the confessions of Mastrozeneca. Very interesting. We'll be right back well as usual. Babylin b has some of the best commentary on this stuff. Headline History repeats itself as communists run out of food at Columbia University. They are communists. That's the key thing people need to understand. This is a Marxists that have been trained there for many, many years. Interesting that nobody really cared until it became anti Semitism. They could be

anti Americanism, but they didn't care until it became anti Semitism. But they are after all Commis, and they are now declaring what their true purpose is in many of these cases. Here, the communies at Columbia University, says Bablin b lasted only about twelve hours before running out of food and pleading for humanitarian aid, setting a new record for the collapse of a communist food supply. Okay, time out on the end Offada revolution. We're out of pizza

rolls, said one organizer. I'm going to go see if the people we just assaulted will send us some door dash another man, why didn't we take over the food court. I'm so happy. I haven't hungry. I haven't had chipolti in almost eight hours now. Still, I bet the people of Gaza are inspired by our sacrifice. Yes, here's the true story that they're parting Here at UCLA, they put out a request that was intercepted by a Fox News reporter. They put out requests for vegan and gluten free food.

These are spoiled, pampered brats. They also said they wanted do not send any bananas or nuts because they've gone bananas and they're full of nuts. They have more nuts there than they can handle, So don't send any more nuts to these nuts. The request list was obtained by Fox News's Old Malugan, if I'm pronouncing his name correctly. It includes a variety of other supplies,

including gas masks, seals, and skater helmets. And of course they love the N ninety five mask that has the mask of shame, like the cone of shame that you give animals, the mask of shame. This outward humiliation and obeisance to the medical martial law. That's become a very effective disguise for people if they want to rob banks or take over college campuses or something like that. So supposedly they're worried about the nuts and bananas, there are worried

about other nuts and bananas that people might have allergies to. I'm somewhat allergic to Marxist college students. I think those kinds of nuts. The guards also require those who enter the encampment to wear the mask, the N ninety five masks. And isn't that interesting because you know they've set up checkpoints, So

this is not about speech, is it? When you've got checkpoints, when you're taking over buildings, when you're busting into them, beating people up and throwing people around, and now they've had massive fights, they've got chaz like entrances, And this is not about free speech. But here's the interesting thing. It's being treated by the Republican and Democrat supporters of Israel as if it was free speech, so they can take down our free speech. Isn't that

interesting? I find that to be very interesting. It is not about free speech at all. What these people are doing is not peacefully assembling, as the First Amendment says, to air their grievances. No, it's something completely different. So why are they making it about speech? Why are they criminalizing any criticism of Israel the political entity? Even? Why are they doing that?

You and I both know why? Because they want to. They're looking for an excuse to censorsus in every way they can, every way that they can. For nearly a week, the propile standing activists have excluded members of the public and the press by force. It's not a free speech issue. And now you've got Mike Johnson out there. You know they're coming up though. We got an anti anti Semitism, anti anti Semitism Act or whatever they want to go on. The protesters don't believe in free speech, just like

the Satanic Temple doesn't believe in Satan. They're using these things, you know, they're using this. What does the Temple of Satan set up these phony things that I was talking about yesterday. Why they do that, Well,

because they want to suppress free exercise of religion of other people. They're goading you into banning that so they can say, oh, well, you banned our religious exercise of something that they have declared publicly that they don't believe, so now we can ban the free exercise of what you really do believe.

So that's the purpose of the Satanic Temple, the purpose of these protesters who have never believed in free speech, what they've been doing on campus for years, urging anybody that comes that they don't agree with, no debates, you're racist or this or that. And so their purpose is perhaps the purpose of Soros, who has been pushing all this censorship and stuff as well. Perhaps a purpose is really to shut down free speech, just like the purpose of

the Satanic Temple is to shut down on the free exercise of religion. It's never about what it's about, is it not. With these people, there's always a hidden agenda, and it doesn't take too long for that hidden agenda to rise to the top. So the chaos is actually benefiting both Natan Yahoo

and Mike Johnson because it is distracting people from what they're doing. You look at Mike Johnson again, I said, virtue signaling going to Colombia, and so they can attack him and he can look strong even though he's incredibly weak and bought out. He goes there like he's got a backbone, which he doesn't. And so this is about their political agendas. Nobody's paying attention to what NETANYAHUO is doing now. It's all about these Marxist revolutionaries. It's exactly

the opposite of what they say they want to accomplish. They have taken away attention from the cause they say they oppose by their action. But the net result of this will be attacking our basic liberties and the Bill ryans, CBS is ignoring the major national security threat of bringing in Palestinians from Gaza, writes The New American. And they're right, except that it's not Biden. Their headline says, CBS says ignoring. CBS says the New American is ignoring major

national security threat Biden envisions importing Gaza Palestinians. Biden didn't write that legislation, he didn't pass that legislation. Mike Johnson did. But they're not going to criticize him because he's a conservative Republican. Supposedly, all you have to do is get yourself a label. See Trump is not a globalist, in spite of what he did in twenty twenty, which was marching in lockstep and leading everybody being at the front. He was a pied piper for the globalist agenda.

But he is an anti globalist. We know that. We've been told that over and over again by both the establishment press and the controlled conservative press. He's anti globalist, so he couldn't betrayed us in twenty twenty. Mike Johnson is a Christian Conservative. He couldn't be betraying us like this, except he is. He's a trader. He's a trader. He sold out. I never expected Trump to do anything but sell us out. I expected better of Mike Johnson. So listen, if it had been Pelosi doing this,

do you think that they would have blamed her. Of course they would. Why aren't they blaming Mike Johnson for this? Oh, Pelosi did this, Biden did this. They never say Trump or Mike Johnson did it. Right, But they're right that it is a threat. They said, left unexplained is why the Islamic Arab nations won't take them in. Well, I think we know, don't we Why is it a Saudi Arabia doesn't one of the Palestinians or the United Arab Emirates doesn't want them, or any of them.

So you know they don't want to bring them in. And here's how the thing is going to work. What CBS does say is that there are several thousand They don't say how many, just say several thousand Palestinians that have not been deported, and they're going to use chain immigration to bring people in from Palestine. Are you related to somebody? Oh you say you are? Okay? Well I don't have any way of checking that. So I'll just take

your word for it. So you're related to these people and Palestine, well, then come on in. You're all fine, right, we've seen that happening across the border before. That's nothing new. It's just going to now be used to bring in people from Palestine. And then if you even if you don't have somebody who claims to be your relative here in the United States, you can claim that you're fleeing Hamas, which is a declared terrorist organization

declared by the United States. And so if you say that you're fleeing Hamas, even if you are Hamas, you get a free ticket to come in. And it's going to be, you know, even harder than it was with MS thirteen. You know, the MS thirteen gang, they had a habit of having their face tattooed with MS thirteen and all of their gang symbols. But you know, the Ice didn't care, The federal government didn't care. They let him come in anyway. I've told the story many times about

the father who was disrought. He came from Venezuela. He knew about MS thirteen. He said, I'm sorry, not Venezuela. Let's see, I forget now it was Evenzuel and old Salvador. Where they're from. I think it's anyway, he was from the same country, told the story many times, but now forgotten that detail getting old here. I guess the anyway what he said was his daughter from the same country. I'm thinking it was ill

Salvador. But he said, we fled there, and they went all the way up to Long Island, New York to try to get away from them, except that there were so many of them there, and they got into an argument with her, and of course a border patrol ice Homeland Security they knew these kids were here illegally, but you know, we got Dhaka. So you have Obama's head of Homeland Security says, we're not going to enforce the law. I know that's the law, but we're not going to enforce

it. And then Trump said, well, I'd like to get rid of that. I'd like to enforce the law. But let me ask the Supreme Court if I can enforce the law. Let me ask them if I can overturn an executive order from the previous president who said he wasn't going to enforce the law. Is that allowed? The Supreme Court says, of course not, and he goes, oh good, okay, well I can't do anything about it because the Supreme Court said I can't do anything about it. So

they're there. They know that they are illegal immigrants, and they know that they're MS thirteen because it's tattooed all over their face, but they won't do anything about it. So what do you think about the Hamas people? You think we're gonna do they tattoo the fact that they're Hamas on their face. No, no, they don't do that, but it wouldn't matter if they did, because our government wants to destroy this country. You understand this is

not incompetence, it's malice. Politicians like Biden and Johnson hate America except for what they can get out of it. And in that regard, they're just like the people they're bringing in the drug gangs in Central America hate America. They want what they can get. The people are coming in for the welfare magnet, for the Cloward and Pivot and stuff. They hate America. They want the free stuff. And they don't care about this, and they're going

to go back. They're not going to bother to learn the language or get a citizenship, most of them and they're going to take what they can and go back, and they're just like Biden and Johnson, in it for what they can get out of it. It's a greed and power trip for Biden and Johnson, and it's a greed and power trip for these people as well, bringing in more people just like them. Frankly, and so the Johnson House, let's just put that in there, because you know, you have

a conservative media does not like to talk about the Johnson House. If it says House approves. If it was Pelosi, it'd be Pelosi approves, it's you a speaker, it'd be Pelosi does this, But they won't say it's Johnson, just like it wasn't Trump, it was the pandemic, It was the COVID that did all that stuff to us. No, it was Trump, it was Trump, it was Fauci, No, it was Trump. So Johnson approves the Anti Semitism Awareness Act, Well, what we need is

a Marxist Awareness Act, because that's what these people are about. That's really the issue here. And evidently Johnson and the Republicans are not aware that they are Marxists and that that's the real issue. Maybe somebody needs to make them aware maybe we need to have in response a First Amendment Awareness Act. Do you guys realize what you sor to as a condition of your office? Do you realize that if you violate your oath to the Constitution, you have no

authority. I don't care if the Supreme Court says it's okay, not okay with me? So zero had you asked some questions about this, How and by what measure will federal authorities crack down on speech those named anti semitic? And as I said at the very beginning, this is not about speech. You know they're used, They're using these Marxist riots as an excuse to crack down on speech. The lockdowns, folks, were not about a pandemic. They were not about a fire. They were not about a sickness. They're

about them exercising their new tools of control. The climate stuff is not about CO two, it's not about climate change, it's not about any of that stuff. It's about them having a pretext to exercise to solitarian control. And that's what this is about. And so the questions now become will criticism of the government of Israel be deemed anti semitic? What if we criticize a foreign political entity. Is that racism. Will highlighting alleged war crimes or human rights

abuses by the IDF be considered anti Semitic. Will involvement in the BDS movement, that's to disinvest from anybody that has any disinvest from supporting financially supporting Israel, will involvement in the BDS movement be deemed anti Jewish. Will slogans such as from the River to the Sea Palestine b free will that be illegal according to federal law. Look, we don't have anybody left anymore that supports free

speech, do we. Nobody supports free speech. And by that I mean when you support free speech, you support the right of people to say things that you disagree with. We don't have anybody like that. The people on the left, if you disagree with them, they want to shout you down and cancel you. People on the right, if they disagree with what you have to say, they want to shout you down and cancel you. I

mean, just look at what Mark Levin was saying. We need to make sure these people never have a job anyway, right, boy, talk about taking canceling to the next level. Why are conservatives talking about that isn't it a bad thing to be canceled off of the digital public square? Yes? Is that a bad thing to be kicked out of your bank because they don't like your politics and religion? Yes? Is it a bad thing to be marked so that you're not able to get a job. Yes. Why are

they criticizing what Mark Evin said? Oh, they're high fiving him on that stuff. He is a shameless racist tyrant. He applauded everything the deep state wanted to do. He was opposed to Trump when Trump was saying the right stuff as a candidate in twenty sixteen, when he became president, he became a shameless apologist for him. He was telling Trump brag about the fact that

you did the vaccines. Biden is trying to take credit for them. We need to give Trump a ticker tape parade, like we need to give him a striped suit and a life sentence, multiple life sentences for the millions of lives that he destroyed. And you too, Mark Levin, that's what needs to be known. That's you know, those are actual crimes, not because of what they said, but because of what they did. And these are the people who get away with these crimes are murder, literal mass murder.

They want to shut down your free speech. I wonder why they don't want anybody to talk about that, do they? Oh? I tell you can smell these people a mile away as soon as they come after speech. It's like, Okay, what's his game here? What is he trying to pull on us? How is he trying to make us poor slaves to the globalists? Will criticizing the three plus billion dollars an annual foreign aid to Israel, Well, that'd be considered to be anti Jewish. And what are the many

Jewish protesters who are engaged in speech condemning the nation state of Israel. Show the picture of their travis of this article here, zero edge ultra orthodox Jewish protesters. Yeah, they don't. They don't like the political government of Israel. And actually they're not Zionists either. They said, if there's a picture of them, they said, yes, God has promised Israel to the Jews and he will do it miraculously, not politically like this. And they don't

support the policies of people like Nett you know who as well. But nobody wants to debate, nobody wants to tolerate allowing somebody to say anything that they disagree with, and they don't want to debate. Instead, they want to force people, Force people off of campus, force people out of their job, force people off of social media, force force force everywhere they go, the hand of force, destroy liberty everywhere. That's always a solution from these

people. Doesn't matter if it's Mike Johnson or the Palestinian Marxist on campus, it's always the same thing, or Mark Levin. You know, we're going to punish these people because you don't like what they have to say, and we're going to silence them and shut them up forever. Well, that's not the way of liberty. That's not what made this country great. That is the path to tyranny and slavery. Folks, if you can't checkchallenge, and

criticize the government, especially a foreign government, are you kidding me? And what does that say about the outsized control they have over our government if you're not allowed to criticize them, amazing. Free speech is defending the beach that you disagree with. Already, active participation and causes that are boycotting Israel is now illegal in a number of US states. As a matter of factor, you can go back and look at what de Santis did so I could get

big Jewish owners. I guess you know the widow of the big casino owner, Sheldon Adelson, she's still got a lot of money. She used to be the biggest contributor to the Republican Party. She's in Israel now, So I guess that's maybe that's why he went there to sign the bill. So she had noticed. But nevertheless, you know, he signed a bill saying that any anti Semitic speech is a hate crime and it's going to be treated as a felony. Well, why isn't the violence that these people doing isn't

that enough to treat that as a felony? Do you do the hate speech stuff simply because you want to get rid of free speech? And as we see at USF amazing, Like I said, yesterday, had school where I met Karen University of Tampa fifty years ago. Somebody dumped a baby in the trash can there, and then the next day I look at this in the school that I went to graduated from USF they got protesters and fighting with the

police there. And the question I had was, since DeSantis already put in a bill saying that any criticism of Jewish people or Israel is anti Semitic and it's a hate speech felony. Are they going to charge these USF protesters with a felony? Is it going to be if they get into a fight with a police, if they get into a fight with students on campus and try to keep people off, if they bust into buildings and destroy public property, those are not as important. You know. The worst crime is what they

say. Are we going to accept that for America? I'm sorry, that's not acceptable. Those other things are real crimes. When you talk about a hate crime, you're really talking about judging somebody's motive and you're trying and you're talking about a thought crime. But it's also to be able to censor anyone

and everyone. And these conservatives who are out there trying to shut people down for anti semitism are no better than the left, who when you say, well tell me something about why you're here, racist, racist, get out of here. You know that's that's exactly that. They're exactly the same. Isn't it amazing how alike the left and the right are. I hate these

parties. I hate these Democrats and Republicans where they passion. Every day I look at them and I hate them more because they hate America, they hate our liberty. They want to kill us in wars and revolutions and civil wars. They're disease, disease of the mind and the soul. These political parties. The founders hated political parties. Maybe they knew something. They hated partisanship.

Boy, do I hate it. The bill would require the Department of Education do you use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance Working definition of anti Semitism when enforcing anti discrimination laws. And as one of the people pushing back against it said, oh, okay, so there's no definition of anti Semitism in this anti anti Semitism law. And it's just kind of like what they say is

what those people say, we're going to reference an external group. What they say reminds me very much of what the FBI would labeling people as terrorists and as extremists and all that. Like me, okay, because I was attacked by the Anti Defamation League, or I was attacked by the Southern Poverty Law Center, there's an FBI. I said, well, we'll just let them decide who the terrorists are. So the Congress is going to let this International

Holocaust Remembrance Alliance decide who's anti Semitic and what is anti Semitic. The group defines anti semitism as quote, a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Well, let's understand that these same people have been selling us this race beating agenda. Love to talk about unconscious bias. Well, you may not actually hate Jews, but what you're saying is harmful

to Jews, so therefore you are unconsciously biased against them. That's what we've seen with the black and white stuff and all the rest of the things. Unconscious bias. I know, you don't don't really have any animosity to anybody, but you're a hateful racist anyway. You have unconscious by simply because you're white. And they say rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti semitism rhetorical are directed

towards Jewish and non Jewish individuals. The organization provides a number of examples for what qualifies as anti Semitism, including calling for the harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or extremist view of religion, and of course they will tell us what is radical, and they will tell us what is extreme.

We have seen people at PDA meetings, in school board meetings being labeled as extremists because they oppose the sexual grooming of children, they oppose pornography being shoved in the faces of young kids and put in the libraries of the schools. You are an extremist. Now they are the extremists, but they're the ones wielding the labels. So so any extremist view of religion or accusing Jewish

individuals as inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust. So even a theoretical discussion writes this zero head j article or interpretation could be considered to be illegal, as it already is in some European countries. Matt Walsh said. The legislation itself never says what the definition of anti Semitism is. All it says is that the definition is whatever this other group says. What they say, you know, it grants the force of law to whatever that organization happens to decree on the

subject. And of course it's not even fixed to whatever they say it is at this point in time. What if they change their definition of this. By the way, this is what they're about to do with the who's international health regulations. Well, pandemic is whatever the WHO says it is. Anti semitism is whatever this Jewish organization says it is. So if they say it's anti semitism, you're gone. If they say it's a pandemic, you're locked

down. You've got to have your passports, all the rest of this stuff. This is you know, our government for the longest time, Congress has kicked the can to the other side, to the bureaucracy so that they don't have to write the laws. So we've got laws, we got regulation without representation, Congress is useless at this point, folks. And so because they have kicked this over to the bureaucracy forever now and now they're going to another

step. Now they are going to kick it to outside organizations. So we're not going to have even the present with an executive order lock us down declaring a pandemic. No, we'll let a foreign organization do it. We're not going to have the Congress attack free speech in the name of anti symatism. They're not even going to give us a definition. They'll go to some outside organization for that. It's just amazing. It's going to reminds me of what

Trump did with the gun control stuff. There's bad enough that Congress would pass gun control legislation in defiance of the Second Amendment, but then they Trump did it by executive order. Biden and La La Harris love that. It just keeps getting worse. Washington is gone, folks. So Margie Tellergreen says anti semitism is wrong, but I will not be voting for the anti Semitism Awareness. It's not even about awareness. I should call it the Anti Semitism Punishment

Act or whatever. This it's again doesn't even have to be anti semitism, because it's something's being defined by this outside group may not be actual anti semitism. And I've said that for the longest time as well. You know, when you point the finger at everybody and say you're racist, racist, racist, what do you do You give a real pass to the racist people out there. Well, they call everybody racist, You call everybody racist. Nobody's

racist, really, that's what happens. So the people are actually racist, get off of the free pass. So she said this could convict Christians of anti semitism for believing the gospel. It says Jesus was handed over to Herod to be crucified by the Jews. Well, that's not the good news. The good news is what he gives us. But still, when you look at what the Bible says, it doesn't simply say that he was pilot had responsibility for it. The jew Jewish leaders had responsibility for it. The Jewish

people who said, you know, crucifying had responsibility for it. But Jesus said, I lay my life down, no one takes it from me. He voluntarily did that. And here's the good news. And you know what else, we were responsible for his crucifixion. He wouldn't have needed to lay down his life if it wasn't for our sins. I ask people and all these other religions, what do you do with your son? Well, I just hope for the best. I do lots of good work because and I

hope that it outweighs that. Well, you can't ever get right with God after you have rebelled against him. The punishment for that is death. And the animal sacrifices were a picture of the ultimate sacrifice. It would have to be paid for us to get back in God's good graces. So who killed Jesus. I did, you did? He died for your sins. He died for my sins. So all this stuff about, but again you have people who will use that. You know, people attacked Mel Gibson for his

this movie said, oh it's anyway, they don't understand the gospel. Currently, and historically, pro israel Hawks who advocate for sending billions in American taxpayer dollars to Israel each year tend to accuse any and all opponents of such policies of being anti submitic. Some independent journalists say they have struggled to find blatant examples of people being targeted in anti Submitic attacks on campuses. Yeah, anybody

opposes them on anything, they call you racist or anti Semitic. Quite frankly, I don't care, you know, load it up, call me whatever you want. I don't really care. I know what's going on, I know what's true, and it's going to You can call me an anti vaxer, conspiracy theorist, whatever you want to call me. I mean, I will admit to those I'm not racist or any Semitic, but I am anti VAXX and I have lots of not just even conspiracy theories. I've got a

lot of conspiracy facts, so I don't really care about those labels. None of us should. So Matt Walsh again, he says, the vast majority of Republicans just voted for a bill to criminalize criticism of the Israeli government. And think about this, folks. If they can criminalize criticism of the Israeli government, think they'll do it with the American government. In a sense.

They have right already in many different ways. If the bill passes, you will be guilty of hate speech if you apply double standards quote unquote to the government of Israel, or if you accuse it of genocide. And so I don't know if they're gonna be fired by Big Shapiro for saying that New York City Mayor Eric Adams surprised me. He actually got upset when he saw them

waving the flag of another country. He said, it's despicable that schools would allow another country to fly, would allow another country's flag to fly in America, that they would take down the American flag, they would fly their Palestinian flag. Well, you know, I kind of felt that way about Congress, you know, when all these Democrats were waving the Ukrainian flag the Democrats and Johnson wasn't waving it, but he knew it was going to happen.

I mean, don't tell me that all the Democrats are getting a Ukrainian flag and Johnson doesn't know it. They're walking in, they're handing them flags, or they're walking in their flags and stuff that he doesn't know it. Is he really that stupid night. It's not that stupid. That's one thing he's not. He is very cunning. He's not that stupid. He knows that they had those flags, and he let that go on for quite some time before you had Chip Roy and others get up there and say that's a violation

of the rules. Stop that. And then of course that video there was done by Thomas Massey and he had the chief law enforcement what they call him, Sergeant of arms. I think he wanted to find Massy, not find the people waving the flags, which is every bit as much a violation protocol as filming the people waving the flags. They can do whatever they want.

If you report their crimes, you committed a crime for reporting them. So yeah, Eric Adams said it was despicable that US schools would allow another country's flag to fly on their campuses while defending the New York Police Department after hundreds of officers in riot gear broke up pro Palestinian protests on Columbia University's campus and they took down the flag as well. So to me, that was kind of surprising. I didn't expect to see Eric Adams defending the American flag.

So Adams became heated after police showed a number of videos and included protests at Columbia as well as a protest at City College in New York, where demonstrators took down an American flag. He said. Another significant part of the video was at the end, said Adams, that's our flag, folks. You don't take over our buildings and put another flag up. That maybe find other

people, but it's not to me. I guess it was okay though for him when they were removing statues and stuff, and quite frankly, it bothers me more to see statues of people who contributed to society who were not perfect. Nobody is perfect, but if they moved us in a major direction towards liberty, had some major accomplishments, and we honor them. That's what these people are tearing down because they want to tear down our society. They want

to take us back into the Stone ages. They want to level everything so they can reconstruct their socialist revolution. And we've now got these leaders of this movement saying that on campus, we have to destroy everything so we can have our Marxist revolution. They're actually saying that. Got a recording of it.

I'm going to play for you here in a minute. But you know when they remove these statues, you know, the flag is a political enemy, enemy entity, should say, and it is now a political enemy Fordians slipped there. Yeah, that's right. Trump is accepted the invitation to speak at the Libertarian Party. That should be interesting. What is reception is going to be. I don't know what they're going to do. I know what would have happened when I was there. Of course, Libertarian Party has. I

haven't changed, but the Libertarian Party has. But the way it was identified, most of these articles identified as the Libertarian Party, and then I saw one of them. It is from raw story. Their headline was Trump agrees to speak to anti government groups. Like what is that liberty? Yeah, that's what they call Libertarian Party, an anti government group. And I thought about it for a second. I thought, okay, I'll take that.

I'll accept that label. I'm anti vax I'm anti government, I'm a conspiracy theorist. I don't really care. Those are accurate labels actually, quite frankly of me, so it bothers me more to see these statues taken down. You think you're perfect, you think you don't think there's anything in your life that is wrong. Have you accomplished anything? These people that have statues put up, for the most of them made some significant contributions to our society into

our understanding. Okay, Jefferson had slaves, but do you understand the other things that he did, And do you understand that most of the people, not most of the people, but most of the wealthy people, the people who were in government at the time, had slaves. But that doesn't that blindness in their life does not take away from their warnings and their understandings about power and how it needs to not be centralized. And those are the takeaways

that and the things like the Bill of Rights that we now despise. Quite frankly, I'm more than happy slavery's gone, and I would like to keep the Bill of Rights but these people want to talk about an institution that's gone so that they can destroy the Bill of Rights. And the way they do that, it's by taking down the statues to the people who wrote the Bill

of Rights and other things like that. Yeah, they were not perfect, but it bothers me a lot more to see that happen than it does to see a flag taken down, because the flag also represents what our government is today. And yes, I am anti government. I despise what both parties are doing today, says Eric Adams. And my uncle died defending this country. These men and women put their lives on the line. It's despicable that

schools allow another country's flag to fly in our country. Well, you know, and a lot of the people that they tore down these statues of a lot of them died because of what they did as well, and they also left a legacy. He said, we're not surrendering our way of life to anyone. What a joke. This is the guy who is destroying private cars,

and he's allowing the crime basically to go unanswered. And he's bringing in all the migrants and giving them, putting them to the head of the line and giving them, the illegal immigrants, giving them more than he does the American citizens. Are you kidding me? We're not going to surrender our way of life to anyone. He's been one of the key guys pushing the Sea forty agenda. That's surrendering my ability to even eat meat and have milk or

travel. That's surrendering that to the globalists, and he's a part of that. It's so strange to see Eric Adams defending the American flag. And it's equally strange for me to see the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where you've got a fraternity that is defending the American flag. That is the last place on Earth that I would have expected, except for New York, that I would have expected the American flag to be defended because we used to

live not too far from unc Chapel Hill. Very surprising to me, but it's a bunch of guys in a fraternity. As the Marxists were coming for the flag, they stood there defending it. It went viral. They put up a GoFundMe thing. Interestingly enough, Bill Ackman, who has been in fights with Harvard over this Gaza Palestine stuff and everything, and he wanted to do a kind of McCarthy blacklisting, just like Mark Levin of people that he

disagreed with. He doesn't support free speech, but he supports making sure that these people who have you know, signed their name or whatever, wants them kicked out of school, wants them to never have a job working for anybody ever in their life. Very McCarthyism, right, blacklisting people for life. And you know, he has an interesting history. I haven't talked about it

before, but Bill Ackman, hedge fund manager. He made a fortune shortening the stock market as the lockdowns were about to come early March, and then he goes on TV and makes this emotional plea with President Trump to shut the country down after he's already put in his orders to profit from the plunging stock market. Great guy, great guy. I don't really respect people like him. He endorsed Bloomberg, the Democrat, technocrat, the climate terrorist, eco

terrorists, whatever you want to call him. That's what Bloomberg is. He's an eco terrorist, I guess, maybe the best one. But he was a big supporter of Michael Bloomberg. And he wants McCarthyism against people. But he disagrees with Look, I disagree with those people as well, but I don't like to see this blacklisting, this cancel culture that's been put out there

because it's directed at free speech. So when you look at what Thomas Massey said about this anti semitism, ability says, do you agree with all these examples of semitism? And he lists what was put in there. You might be an anti Semitist or you might be anti semitic if you are, you know, it's kind of like a you might be a redneck if you fox Worthy remember that, Well, you might be anti semitic if you do any

of these things. There's a long list he puts us up. He says, should people in America be prosecuted for saying these things in all contexts? See, the issue is is that nobody in America should be prosecuted for saying anything if they are, we don't have a free country, we don't have the Bill rights, we don't have the First Amendment if you can be prosecuted for saying anything. And so the example out of the bill says, well, it could include but it is not limited to and it's got a very

long list here. But of course it could be anything it includes, but it's not limited to oh that's nice. So we still don't know what the boundaries of this are. It's a completely open ended thing. It canna be things like stereotypical allegations or a myth about a world Jewish conspiracy. I say this all the time. You know, George Soros. You can't criticize George Soros. Why because he's Jewish. But he hates the Jewish people, right,

he's Jewish. So if you criticize George Soros because he's Jewish, you call him a globalist, which he is. But since he's Jewish, he gets a pass on that because we've got this stereotype out there about it a global Jewish conspiracy. Well, the problem is is that that also includes people like Gates, who's not Jewish. It includes people like the Rockefellers, which not Jewish. It includes Klaus Schwab who's not Jewish. Yeah, there's a lot of Jews in it, but there's a lot of non Jews in it

as well. Why don't we look at what people actually do. I'm not going to be intimidated by these kinds of labels, and you shouldn't be either. We need to push back and resist in the same way that you got even a fraternity at unc Chapel Hill resisting people taking the American flag? Can we resist them taking our first Amendment? If you accuse Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, then then

to the interests of their own nations. What if I accuse Congress of being more loyal to other countries than they are to America waiving their flag, sending the money to these other places and not giving us opinion. Instead is allocating three and a half billion dollars for Biden to bring in people from Palestine. Do you think that these paid politicians are more loyal to Ukraine and to Israel than they are to America. They just proved it a couple of Saturdays ago.

They proved it. Go look at the bill and tell me that they're not more loyal to foreign governments than they are to us. And again it includes people like Mike Johnson who are not Jewish, but they are more loyal

to them than they are to America. And so it finishes up by saying anti Semitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law, for example, denial of a Holocaust, or a distribution of anti Semitic materials in some countries, or if it's like Andrew Bridgen talking about how many people have been killed by this job and he says it's he said, and he was quoting a scientist who said that. He says a scientist, it's going to be like that, it's like a Holocaust. Oh, you can't say that that's

anti semitic. It's like, no, it's not. That's not even denying the Holocaust. But oh, it's got to be separate. And I know, look, we know that Stalin and mal killed more Peo people then died in the Holocaust. That's a fact. But you know, you can't don't talk about that at all. And so you're going to take somebody who is trying to tell us the truth about this mass murder. And that's what the Conservative Party in the UK used to silence and to cancel him. You said

something about the Holocaust. I'm done with this stuff, folks, I really am. I am sick to death of people like Johnson, these shills that are up there. So anyway, the wh when you look at it, and there's a lot of this back and forth from these people about Jesus and his crucifixion and that type of stuff. Look, there's no telling where these people are going to use it. There's a lot of different ways that they're going to persecute us. I think it's even bigger when you look at the

tip of the spear is really not the anti Semitism charges. The tip of the spear is the LGBT stuff. But again, going back to USF, please use tear gas on protesters there. At USF where I graduated from and fifty years ago, we had radical Marxists that were there at the time. They weren't an engineering they you know, hung out in other places. But so at UCLA again, folks, this is not free speech. Let me show you why they're doing at UCLAD. Look at it. Somebody is being

beaten. Somebody is being beaten with thick and punches in the middle of the lung. Is that is that free speech? Is that free speech? Why isn't that the bigger concern at the bottom of that brawl right there? Yeah, hand to hand melee with sticks and look at that. Look at that. Somebody is being dragged and beaten in the front of that ply that that plywood wall. Wasn't it Einstein who said the Third World War be fought with

sticks and stones? And maybe he's talking about the campuses, I don't know. Just incredible, like where are the police? Where is security? Where are these people? Yeah, but this is la. Where was authority here? Where Darryl Gates gave us the militarized police where they're m rappers and all the rest of this stuff. He gave us the swat teams, He gave us a no knock raide, never covered without any sign of enforcement, law

enforcement security whatsoever. This has gone now on for over an hour and a half, and it is absolutely appalling in my estimation that we have not seen any response. I've just never seen it. Yeah, yeah, And it goes on and on. You know. That's all we saw Darryl Gates when he was still there's not there anymore now. He was there in the nineties, thirty years ago. But he was the one who gave us swat teams and no knock grades and militarized police and all the rest of this stuff.

And then when you had the Rodney King riots, what do you do they use all that stuff to protect themselves. It circled the bugs around the police stations and let everybody else offend for themselves. So, which is what they're doing right now at UCLA campus. What does that tell you? Well, we saw thirty years ago, we see it now. When they get their societal breakdown, folks, you're on your own. There's not going to be

anybody on the other end of the line coming to help you. And so again, you know, think about what you're going to do to prepare. What are you going to do to prepare for food? Do you want to be dependent on them for food? Oh, so they're going to put you in a FEMA camp. Tell you've got to be vaccinated all the rest of this stuff. Right, So, you don't want to be dependent on them for food, you don't want to use their financial system, you don't want

to be dependent on them to protect yourself. And so again you need to take a look at Civil defensemanual dot com. He's got a great chapters on so many different things, but especially about building community because you don't want to be by yourself either. Massive numbers of people can overwhelm you in any of these situations, but it's about how to feed yourself how to get together in a community to defend the community that type of thing. And you also want

to make sure that you are outside of their financial system. Tony Rdman set up David Knight dot Gold and so you go there and you can gradually start to accumulate gold or silver. You can get quantity discounts. That's part of that buyer group that he's got. The wolf pack that's there. You go from fifty dollars on up and actually he's got a kid's version that goes down to thirty five each month. Or you can buy gold and silver at any

big or small individual purchases. It doesn't have to be a part of that. He just set that up for people who want to do it on a regular basis, make it a part of their budget and get quantity discounts as part of a buyer's group. But he will buy or sell this stuff for people, and he doesn't run out of it like they do at Costco. You know, he'll if you place an order, he'll get it for you at that price. He places his order, gets a hold on it.

It may take a little bit of time for it to show up, but he'll get it for you at that price, So go to David Knight dot Gold. I really do appreciate Tony's that support this program. We're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back. I got one or two more things to talk about, but I also want to talk about with this the campus wars, and actually the war is on free speech. But I want to talk about the new regulations another week, another couple of regulations

of things that are going to be banned for you. As Biden is making houses more expensive, he's making everything unaffordable. He's got more regulations for houses, more regulations for power generation, more regulations for appliances. There was an interesting back and forth. They're the White House reporter ask his pres secretary, you know when does this all end? Well, it isn't until we until

we ended. If you like the Eagles, doesn't way the cars and Heuey Lewis in the news they say the Horrors You'll love the Classic Hits channel at a p S radio, download our app or listen now at a p S radio dot com. Analyzing the Globalists next move and now the David Nutshell. I want to thank Michelle Obama, thank you very much. On rock Fan, thank you for the tip. I appreciate that. Well. I thought

I got more to say about this. Again, they make it about free speech, but here's a Jewish student wearing a Star of David necklace deny entry to his own university because he's Jewish. I'm a UCLA student, he says, I deserve to go here. We pay tuition. This is our school, and they're not letting me walk in in. By the way, we'll have the people who are there. The protesters don't go to that school, but they're keeping students who do go to that school out. But let me

ask you, why do you think this would be any different? All of my life, I've watched these schools like UCLA and Harvard and Columbia anything. I've watched them keep people out because they're not the right skin color, or

because they're not the right gender, whichever gender they want to imagine. Right, they have the people running these institutions, and now you've got these these donors like Acmen or Ackerman or whatever that that don't that they've gave money all that time, and they were just fine with it until the mob turned against them. Right, That's what always happens. It's just like Robospear. You generate this Marxist mob, and eventually the mob comes for you, and so

that's what's happening with us. Why is that a surprise, because for decades they have been telling somebody you can't come here because you're this or you're that. So why wouldn't they now at this point say you can't come in because you're Jewish. They've been saying that to white people, to males for a long time at these universities. And so you look at what is happening.

It's not just, of course, this one at Columbia. Here are the Palestinian protesters and you can see some of these people obviously are not students there. They're pretty old. I think maybe they're professors teaching this stuff. But here's the fight that's going on here. Big mob coming in. They're busting into these buildings, and there's two guys there that are locking arms and say no, we're going to stand here protecting us. And so these people wearing

masks are shoving them around. By the way, that guy wearing the glasses there, that's a grandson of Doug Wilson. He says, I'm very proud of him for standing there, and so here's the mob, big mob against two people shoving them. Then I got it, I got it on. He says, this is assault. This is one hundred percent assault. Give those out anyway, what is what is your name? Walk out? Walk? Yeah? What's your name? They got caps on, they got the

N ninety five Fauci masks on. They won't give their names. Right, I'm not signed out? Yeah? Free speech? Right? Is this free speech? Well? You know, Mike Johnson looks at this and he says, you know what we need. We need a regulation coming out of Congress that shuts down free speech. I says response to all this stuff, it's pathetic, pathetic U c l A. The brawls and everything else that are happening. There's pathetic that they would make this about that's not about free speech

at all. There's nothing at the university is about free speech. That's the thing that bothers me so much about Mike Johnson and these other people. Well, here's what this is about. We had one of them explain it to everybody that this is really about a Marxist revolution. There's only one way. So much yay, the crowd likes that, so we can have a socialist reconstruction for the United States of amer Yep, that's it. Let's understand what

this is about. It's not about free speech, it's not about debate. This is about violence. It's about mob violence. And as he said, there's only one solution in FATA revolution. We must have a revolution so we can have a socialist reconstruction of the USA. You see, we have these these youthful idiots at the bottom who have been radicalized by our indoctrination systems. And then at the top we got the people like class Swap saying the same

thing. Quite frankly, you know, Class Swap and his ilk are Marxists. They've got common Pass and they've got you know, the Commons project. And because they're communist, they're communists and they want universal basic can come where

you don't own anything. Because folks, they're communists. How many different ways do they have to tell us they're not woke, they're not climate you know, they're communists, and so they want this at the top, they want to destroy everything, and see points out we have to have a revolution so we can have a socialist reconstruction, destroy everything and then reconstruct it in their communist utopia. Which is dystopian hell. That's what this stuff is about from

all of these people, and absolutely no question about it. Let's talk a little bit about climate. Here we have it's talking about the moves yesterday by the Biden administration and now you've got black Rock. Larry Fink has made his move and he is telling people at the World Economic Form Investment Tip what we need to do is get into some other alternative form of energy because our AI centers are really hungry. And he doesn't say it, but so are there

surveillance centers. And that's ultimately what AI is going to be about, is surveillance. So you look at these massive data centers that the NSA is running, and you look at the artificial intelligence. The amount of energy that these things are using is astronomical. Now he talks about that and he says, you know, it's going to explode. So and we're not going to be able to have the energy artificial intelligence and for surveillance that we need if it's

wind and solar, So we've got to go to something else. Well, Biden administration, on the one hand, it's starting saying, well, let's go to neutral and nuclear because we're going to we're still going to shut down all the coal plants. They're just too cheap and plentiful. So we can't have anything that's cheap and plentiful. Everything must be expensive because this is about a transfer of wealth to the few. So they've got to give us the

most expensive ones. And we've got to make sure that these people at the top when they burn and everything down, that when America is reconstructed, they're going to be on the ground floor and everybody's going to be paying them. And so they've been shutting down coal plants, and now the other hand of the Bide administration is saying, well, we're going to put restrictions on Russian uranium, which is only twenty five percent, but it is also twenty five

percent, and we take away twenty five percent of your supply. If you're a retailer trying to operate on a small margin, if they take away twenty five percent of your business, you're out of business. And so there's a lot of coal natural gas plants that whether they're taking down, will they start up nuclear power plants that they took down before. We'll have to wait and see. But the bottom line is it's going to be them. Who is going to make the money? Now, the Daily Skeptic asked, why is

a WHO so asking doctors to lie in order to promote climate alarmism. Well, because they're both mcguffins, and because the goals are the same, and because they lie about everything. The WHO has published a new toolkit empowering health professionals to tackle climate change, say, there's absolutely no reason why you shouldn't converge these mcguffins, because again, they want in the In the end, they want the same thing. They want depopulation, and then they want control

of the people who are left. In fact, it requires healthcare professionals to use their authority to issue science and to lie to their patients and politicians. The climate war is, after all political, and so the Daily Skeptics said, yeah, that's right. And by the way, so is medicine. Now, medicine is also political. So why shouldn't they If they've got they're

both political and they've got the same goal, why shouldn't they merge? Since the climate scare story merged in the nineteen eighties, well that's when they made it about global warming. But before that, through the seventies, it was all about the ice age, but they still wanted the same thing, may just change with the fashions the era of global boiling. As you and Secretary gutarists put this, this also happens to be the era in which unprecedented social

development has occurred. So surprisingly for a toolkit that is aimed at people such as doctors, who have proven capacity to understand scientific literature if they care, which they don't. Typically they read the marketing press releases from big pharmaceutical and they they pass that on to you. The toolkit offers little evidence in support of these claims. Well, the doctors have been prepared for this because they

were willing to accept little or no evidence about a pandemic. They're willing to accept little or no evidence about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. They didn't even care to vet the lies that were there, that lies that would not pass just critical thought, let alone, show me your data in a scientific investigation. So this toolkit says that changing weather patterns quote unquote, and extreme weather events can reduce crop yields, potentially leading to food insecurity and malnutrition.

That's the plan, isn't it? Food insecurity and malnutrition, poverty, slavery to these people, as data clearly shows though, since nineteen ninety there have been radical reductions and mortality caused by malaria, malnutrition, diarrheal disease, natural disasters, exposure to temperature extremes. You see, one of the best things that you can do for people not just the quality of their life, but life expectancies, to make sure they've got cheap abundant energy and you know,

things like that. Hygiene follow from that. We don't improve our health with vaccines. We improve our health, interestingly enough, with cheap abundant energy, which is why they're trying to take it away from us. How does the data compare with the who's claim that the frequency and intensity of these events is surpassing the capacity of both natural and human systems to respond effectively. Well,

they show the charts in this Daily Skeptic article. Here they say diarreal disease mortality has fallen by two thirds in the period between nineteen ninety and twenty seventeen. Malaria deaths have been cut in half. Yeah, you know, you've got air conditioning you can avoid if you're as everybody does now, they avoid the outdoors, they stay indoors with the air conditioning, you don't get bit by the mosquitoes or whatever. But anyway, similar paradox can be shown

by comparing the who's statements on food security with other UN agencies data. There is no evidence of climate change adversely affecting agricultural production and vulnerable economies, but they want to do that anyway. They want to shut down farms, and now they're trying to use bird flu to shut down our food supply as well. Bill Gates wants to use AI to genetically modify beef cows so he can save the planet. He wants to make it I guess, so that they

can't farty, just blow up. I guess, float away. They turn into big balloons, And there you go. We got col flu. The cow flew away. He couldn't fart, so he just blew up like a big balloon and flew away like the Wizard of Oz. Microsoft founder Bill Gates recently discussed how AI could fight climate change on his podcast. His podcast is called Unconfused Me with Bill Gates. Well, I wouldn't want to be confused

with Bill Gates either. If I were Bill Gates. It was just the type of unhinged conversation it would expect from the same man who touts synthetic beef depopulation and preventing cows from burping and farting, says Technocracy News. So when he was discussing in this interview with a data scientist Hannah Ritchie, he says, I was very stunned how the AIS went from basically not being able to read or write at all to doing that in a very fascile way, he

said. When asked if he thought AI could play a role in taking action on the climate, he said, oh, absolutely, yeah, because it'll be there to measure and to watch and to record and to resnitch on everything that we do. It's going to have a big role in that, because that's what this is all about. Absolutely, he said. He cited the examples of genetically modifying beef cattle with AI so they can produce less methane.

You know, this is I'm saying multiple articles every day about using artificial intelligence with genetic modification. You know, we talk about genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, nanotechnology. The acronym is grain, and they're starting to converge, aren't they in a lot of different ways. I Mean, we see robotics and artificial intelligence. That's how you get these robots that are able to look at the table and you're given instructions and it pulls the stuff out. So

robotics and artificial intelligence, we've seen that being merged. Now there's all this stuff about artificial intelligence and genetics, and that really concerns me because I've used chat GPT really concerns me. So anyway, he says, so we can genetically modify the beef cattle so they produce less methane, or by using AI to somehow produce meat without the cow. Well, here's an idea, Bill, Why don't you let us eat without the gates. Why don't you let

us eat without constantly hectoring us about what we are eating? You know, really tired of his advice. As a matter of fact, a lot of people are tired of his foods. Remember, he invested in impossible foods. He invested in upside foods, which really ought to be called upside down foods. He invested in beyond meat, which I think ought to be called beyond food. Anyway, he and his ilk are nothing more than ring race of greed. You know, they're not looking at some ring of power. Although

that's essentially what it is. But they're just they are so in love with money that it's kind of turned them into these horrific ring race And he's not even aware of it. I think he doesn't even realize just how despicable his actions are. Perhaps he has sadden the past, all rich countries should move to one hundred percent synthetic beef. Why so he can get richer. Yeah, that's why. But he is optimistic that fake meat products will be a

very good alternative for consumers. Last November, Beyond Meat cut nearly twenty percent of its non production workforce following plummeting sales as customers a skewed the and that interesting looks like chew, doesn't it. But it sounds sounds kind of like a sneeze as chew his food. It's very appropriate to use that word.

His highly process and unhealthy concoction. Once heavily hyped. It's stock that is, Beyond Meat has fallen more than sixty percent, and an opinion piece in The New York Times recently referred to lab grown meat as quote the revolution that died on its way to dinner. Well better that than the people die after they eat his dinner, because what's typically going to have it such products going off for much in the way of environmental benefits and maybe even be causing more

harm than good. So Gates is going after a cow burps. He is investing in an Australian startup that's focused on preventing cows from burping methane emission. They're being polied about it. I don't know the cows burp that much. Basically, they're farting air by feeding them a dietary supplement with a synthetic version of an ingredient in red seaweed that prohibits methane formation. So it's not even giving them red seaweed, but it's a synthetic version of red seaweed. Isn't

that great? Yeah, really nutritious stuff. Gates Investment Fund said, although cows are a significant greenhouse gas source and it no, it doesn't matter. It really doesn't. The methane, the CO two doesn't matter. We shouldn't be concerned about that at all. We can talk about it, point out how hypocritical these people are. They wring their hands in despair about greenhouse gas and CO two. And then you got people like Taylor Swift that goes around

the world equivalent to seven times in one year with her private jet. Even they're absolute hypocrites, and we can talk about the only reason to talk about CO two and methane is to number one debunk the lie and number two to point out their hypocrisy. But we shouldn't say, well, this is a better solution over here. We should never get into that. We should never assume go with their assumptions that CO two and methane need to be taken down.

They don't need to be taken down. That's why God gave us plans. It's a closed loop system that adjusts anyway. Livestock agriculture remains one of the cheapest protein sources globally, says Bill Gates. That's why he wants to get rid of it, because if you've got cheap protein sources, you don't need his expensive sources that are going to make him rich. If carbon really is as bad as he claims, shouldn't he be concerned about the large carbon

footprint involved in developing and maintaining and disposing of AI technology. Yeah, yeah, they never And that's the biggest hypocrisy. It's not even the private jets and all the global meetings of these people go to. It's artificial intelligence data centers, it's NSA data centers, it's constant biometric surveillance of everything that we do, facial recognition everywhere. That uses a lot of energy, and they

don't care about that. And we also know because you know, when Larry Fink talks about money, he tells you the truth, or at least he tells his friends at the world he can form the truth. And so you know, we know that they don't have They're not going to be able to get enough power out of solar and wind, and it's not going to be steady state power, and so it's going to have to be something else, and it's going to require tons of it, a lot more than they've got

right now. It's going to explode. As he point out, the emissions from the IT technology industry as a whole are expected to account for fourteen percent of global emissions by twenty forty. I think that's very low. As who was talking about, you know, the explosion many many times more than it is right now. So placing all the blame on the planet's woes on cows and glossing over the negative impact of AI on the environment. The planet doesn't

have any woes. The woes are being imposed by the globalists. We don't have a problem with global warming, we don't have a problem with CO two, we don't have a problem with methane. And anyway, the artificial intelligence does show their hypocrisy, so he says, but it all makes sense when you look at their big investments and meat alternatives and into open AI. But I don't really care about the AI's effect on the environment except for its hypocrisy.

But not a day goes by now that you don't see something about genetically modifying food, and that you don't see all of these scare tactics about bird flu and what it's going to do to cows and all the rest of this stuff. And it is now at the point where the media is taken to this is the new thing today. The media has taken to scolding the US Department of Agriculture, which has been over the top stupid about this stuff and

aggressive and trying to expand its empire. It wasn't enough that the FDA went out and tested milk oh we found some viral particles that don't worry, nobody got sick. The cows weren't sick, people that consumed it weren't sick. And you know, we boil it and it breaks it up or kills it or whatever. You know, whether these things are alive or dead, or if they even exist, as we talked about yesterday. So the FDA said, we tested it, but it's not a problem. So then after that,

the USDA goes out and starts looking at ground beef. You know, I kind of think it's interesting that they would look at ground beef instead of its steaks. Right. Why do I say that, Well, because when you ground when you grind up the beef and everything, what you're doing, you're you know, you're shredding it and all this kind of stuff and processing it, and it's getting exposed a lot more to the atmosphere. And you can find anything in anything if you ramp the PCR test up enough, so

it makes it even better. If you test ground beef which has been errated, right, all the different parts internal and everything. You know, it's been exposed to the air, and you can find anything in ground beef, especially ramping it up with a PCR tests like that rather than looking at a

stake. But that even that and all the talk about how they're going to start following cattle and tagging them and banning them from going across state lines if they haven't been vaccinated and haven't been tested and all the rest of the stuff. We understand that game because we've been the cattle. We've been there, We've had as Eric Peters, we've had the ear tag that they tried to put on us, and we know exactly what that game is. And so

we know what the agenda of the US Department of Agriculture is. And yet here's the new thing. We've got reporters now, various outlets are starting to criticize the US Department of Agriculture for not doing enough. Where have we seen

this before? Well, we saw that as well during twenty twenty. You had all of these organizations holding Trump and scolding FAUCI for not doing enough, giving them cover to be more aggressive because we all know, don't we buy now, don't we understand that it's a partnership between the media and government, And so it's like, go ahead, criticize me, go ahead, go ahead do it, and then that I'll respond to that criticism by doing more.

If I just do it on my own it looks a little bit suspicious, right, but you criticize me, and that's what's going on right now. They're not letting up on this bird flu thing to come after our food, and everybody understands it. Like I showed at the beginning of the week that one article that was put up on zero Hedge, people just ranked on zero Hedge and on Epic times for putting that piece of propaganda and clickbait up.

And it was just five hundred comments, not a single one in agreement with any of that stuff, every single one of them mocking, satirized them, condemning them for this foolishness and seeing through it. But again, we'll see what happens. Published on April twenty ninth, the study on the CDC's website. Yeah, they are so concerned about safety and purity of food, aren't they. As a matter of fact, this is a good place for me to play. The several people have talked about what Walmart is doing.

Now they've gone from corn processed and canned in Arkansas to corn coming out of Thailand that has a lot of really bad stuff in it and double the calories. Here's the breakdown from one lady so here's an older can of corn from my pantry, and we're going to compare the two with this newer can of corn. Okay, number one, it says that it has picked and grown on the same day. It has this green little Grape for You label here. Over here, it says that it's from Arkansas, has forty five calories.

What else is oh, and it's gluten free. Okay, let's compare that to the second can. By the way, the biggest difference to the second can is a product of Thailand. Looking at the nutritional information, we went from forty five calories to ninety calories. There's more sodium, there's more carbs. Apparently it's no longer picked and packaged on the same day like this one, and it's no longer gluten free. And also lost that great for you tag. Let me tell you why. On this new can of corn

from Walmart, there's a health warning. Let's read it for camp in your corn. It exposed you to chemicals including lead, which are known in the state of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. I guess that's reason enough to lose the Grape for You symbol that was on this can, So go into your pantry check out your can corn. Yeah, she's at the very beginning of that, by the way, and she just

misspoke because she corrected it later. I think. Decide it's got the sticker it says and grown on the same day. It's like what picked and canned on the same day. But not in Thailand. I guess maybe they lay it out on some lead for a couple of days when they put it in the can. Who knows. Yeah, they're so concerned about our food safety and food purity, aren't they. Where's the FDA in all this? Right? Do they care that Walmart is now selling corn with lead in it?

N they don't care. That's Walmart. You know. They were the kind of people that were essential during the lockdown. The mom and pop businesses on Main Street were non essential, but Walmart was essential. And I said, one of the reasons that really grated with me was because we had been through that about thirty years earlier, twenty five thirty years earlier, we had our

stores and power was knocked out with a hurricane for several days. The only time that we shut the chain down if we had a snow storm or anything else, like that. I would go around pick people up, take them to work, but nobody had power. When power came back in one area, we opened up Wall Street, Wall Street. It was Wall Street Walmart, big Wall Street store right across the street. The cops came around to shut us down, and so Walmart's open. Oh yeah, Walmart can stay

open. You guys are going to shut down? Yeah, so yeah, I've seen that whole thing before as well. April twenty ninth, the study on the CDC's website. The abstract says, an infected cattle experienced non specific illness. Well, maybe, since this is supposed to be scientific, maybe you could be specific about it if you're going to try to take stuff from us, But of course, you know, whether they're taking away your speech or they're taking away your food, they're not going to be specific about it.

They also had reduced feed and take and rumination, and an abrupt drop in milk production. Have you got any numbers with that? An abrupt drop? Was it one percent, five percent, hundred percent? Tell us about that. Although the US FDA has indicated the commercial milk supply remains safe, the detection of influenza virus and unpasteurized bovine milk is a concern. A continued surveillance of bird flu is needed to prevent cross specie and mammal to mammal transmission.

No, it's not where we are right now, folks. Is We're in another one of these bat soup pangling moments here. Oh we have zoonotic specie transmission and evolution and all the rest of this stuff. It's absolute total nonsense. And again, you know Reiters is telling us, then this is by the gold standard, the PCR test. We've seen all of this before, and yet they are shamelessly lying to us, aren't they. They think we don't know, but we know, and we know that they know we

know, and they're still going to lie to us. I'm a bit disappointed and the lack of transparency and urgency, said an epidemiologist who is interviewed by Salon. This is why I said, this is the new thing where they come out and they criticize these agencies for not being authoritarian enough. The bureaucracy needs to do more, It needs to ban more, it needs to do

this faster. I'm a bit disappointed in the lack of transparency and urgency, particularly with the USDA, so particularly with the ones who are the most aggressive. See that's what they were saying. With Fauci. I'm particularly concerned Fauci

hasn't done more. They go to the person who is going to be the lead in all of this, or the agency that's going to be the lead in all of this, and I criticize them for moving too slow, because they're itching to go faster, and it just doesn't seem that there's an appetite to get ahead in this. Salon then went on to report the notion that it is now perhaps calling this bird flu, and they said, well,

is this really kind of should we start calling it cow flu now? And the expert that they got said, well, we have to make it very clear that this is not a new virus. He has been around since two thousand and two. It's been around since SARS. It's not new. It's not like COVID nineteen in the October of twenty nineteen. It has existed for over twenty years. Well again, at least they haven't recycled that part of

it yet. The New York Institute of Technology told Salon calling this the cowflu is misleading if it is only circulating around with cows, then it can be called the cowflu. He said, Well, then I guess that means that bird flu is really only for birds, right. Oh, no, it could jump. It could jump, It could jump to pangolins, even though we don't have them here. Why not? So they said, it's also important to emphasize that it's not a definitive conclusion that the cats from the CDC

report. Yeah, they said, two cats that they fed raw milk to died. Be very afraid of raw milk. They said, no, they said, he even this is the epidemiologist. He said, well, the cats could have died from something else, you know, in raw milk. They could have even died from eating infected birds. We don't know. This is not a virus, however, that we want to play around with. It really confirmed that raw milk is something we don't want people to consume.

See, this one is rolling out for the benefit of big Agro, like the other one rolled out for the benefit a big pharma. Yes, they really don't want people to consume raw milk. So I can imagine another one of these conferences like they had the Milk and Institute in October twenty nineteen when they asked Fauci, how do we get everybody take an untested vaccine worldwide? We do it from the inside with disruption, and we do it iteratively.

Here's the iterative process. We see this every day. They iterate it, reiterate it every day. Every day they take a little bit further. And so Big Agro wants to shut down raw milk once and for all, and then Big Pharma will have its turn to feed at the troth of bureaucratic bands and all the rest of the stuff, because they are angling to try to vaccinate all animals. You see, since they played this herd immunity game on us, and since they injected us with poison, people are a little bit

shy about this at this point in time. So now it's time to go for the actual herd, to go for the actual cattle. And why not because they can do them on an annual basis, just like they tell you to give your dog an annual Rabi shot. I mean last year's didn't work. Yeah, And they can do that. They can require that, or you're not going to be able to process it because they've got the monopolis to control the processing plants. You're not going to be able to transport your cattle.

You're not gonna be able to process your cattle. And you know they can get many, many times more vaccines out there into the cattle than they can into us, And that way they can still poison us by poisoning our food. I just have to put a little bit of a label on there warning this contains deadly mRNA vaccine particles in it that are going to do all kinds of things to your body. But hey, no problem, we just

removed the good for you label that's on the food. They said, scientists don't know what happens if someone consumes and fact did raw milk at the moment. But it's a good sign that there haven't been any fatal cases linked to raw milk, never, not with this, not with anything else. And they said, even though there has been one human case of bird flu caught from cows, here's where these people are lying a lot. But by the

way, five percent of Americans drink raw milk. So if this is an issue, you'd be seeing a lot of people sick and dying, wouldn't you. But no, And like I mentioned before, this one person that they claim got sick had redness in their eye. One report said it was pink eye. That was it. That was it. Do you think we could live with this? Do you think we should destroy the food supply over somebody who got red eye or conjunctividis. As a matter of fact, that's exactly

what dairy farmers are worried about, and they set it out loud. Barons Publication interviewed doctor Joe Armstrong. He is a cattle production expert at the University of Minnesota Extension and the article that was on Barons headline was dairy farmers are still reluctant to report suspected avian flu. One expert insinuated that the regulation could soon be changed to force farmers to slaughter their entire cattle herds if just one

cow test positive. We knew this was the goal. If they want to have zero bird flu, well they may say, you're going to have zero cattle. It's always this zero stuff. We're going to have zero traffic desks. Well that means we're going to have zero cars and we're going to have zero cases of PCR. Or we're going to lock down all of Shanghai and keep it locked down. We've seen this, how it destroyed the Chinese economy

and everything else. But they don't care. These people, like the Chinese communists, like Mao, They like to starve people to show them how powerful they are. And we're run by the same people. This is Mao's America now that we're talking about here, she Van Fleet pointed out. So doctor Joe Armstrong, cadile expert, I was asked by Barons. Barron said, what would keep farmers from wanting to tell the authorities that they think their cows

are sick. Cows aren't sick, folks, They're not sick. Nobody is sick. Nobody that none of the stuff that was tested. The cows are not sick. It's just like the other quote unquote pandemic in twenty twenty. Nobody was sick. It was a PCR test. Armstrong says, the major reluctance when you talk to farmers is there's still too much connection to highly pathoogenic avian influenza. So farmers are looking at what the USDA requires of poultry flocks

when they test positive. And Barons knows, They said, you mean that the USDA it requires farmers to kill their entire poultry flock if they get a positive test. The bird doesn't have to be sick. It can be only one bird who knows what the magnification is on their PCR test. But you got one bird that gets a positive killed the entire flock, millions of birds killed, he said. Baron says, you think the farmers worried they'll be ordered to kill their cows, and Armstrong says, yeah, correct, because

we refuse to name it something else. Even though it is something else, there's still too much connection. He says after that, it's just the economics of having the USDA on your farm and trying to manage that. Imagine for these farmers having the USDA come on their farm as like having the irs auditor come into your house. Oh nice house, she got here, that type of thing. You know, where'd you get that thing? Did you report

that? Or whatever? Barons In addition to mandating that positive tests be reported to the USDA, the new Federal Order or also requires testing any lactating cattle before their move I've talked about that before, he says. Does that go too far? He asked this guy. Listen to what the guy says. Because they're afraid of the government. He says, that's a step in the right direction. What that's a step in the direction of tyranny. These people

are afraid of our tyrannical government. We've already gone too far, haven't we a step in the right direction? He says. I kind of think it's a wake up called industry to say that unless you want the USDA dictating what happens, you need to come up with your own plan to control this. This is like saying, censor yourself so that Google doesn't do it, or Facebook or Twitter, censor yourself, or we'll do it for you. How far away is that from just telling people kill yourself. We're all going to

do it right. Yeah, I can make it very painful for you. I could just commit suicide. How about that? So, with all this happening, Biden has locked in regulations targeting every appliance owned by almost every household. Quote for too long outdated energy efficiency standards have led to higher utility bills. Oh well, he's making higher utility bills by banning our fuel, by shutting down our power plants, by giving us the most expensive kinds of energy

that we can find, wind and solar. Why do you think the Chinese and the Indians are using coal because it is far and away the cheapest and most reliable form of energy, so that will be banned by the Department of Energy. They finalize their regulations on Tuesday for popular appliance that will push the market toward adopting heat pump technology. This is at the same time that they're you know, the Department of Energy is pushing banning everything that's not electric.

At the same time the EPA is shutting down power generation into the grid. The does final energy efficiency regulations for water heaters will apply to common electrical water heaters and significantly increase the share of those models that use heat pumps. According to the agency, it'll significantly increase the price. The Biden administration's efforts to push rules and regulations targeting appliances ranging from pool pump motors, and light bulbs

to furnaces and portable generators. Yeah, folks, if you want any of this kind of stuff, you better stock up now because it's going to be unbelievably expensive and inefficient if they can even build it, because you know, I guess we can import it from China when they build it for us. By the way, Jennifer Granholm, who's the Secretary of energy. What does she know about any of this stuff? What does she know even about efficiency

or designing any of this stuff. She's a lawyer. She's not an engineer. She's a lawyer. She's a Harvard lawyer. She wasn't an American citizen until she was twenty one years old, and then she got naturalized. So I guess you could get into government, you know, being there at Harvard, you know, you really should get naturalized so that you can, you know, be the energy secretary. But she said, almost every household has a water heater, and for too long, outdated energy efficiency standards have led

to higher utility bills for families. She said, so you know, you need to buy these new expensive water heaters to save money. It's just like the cost benefit analysis of the warp speed, vaccines or anything else. But since she's not an engineer, she doesn't do cost benefit analysis. But you don't have to be an engineer. You just have to be an ordinary citizen to look at this and say, I can't PLoP down all this money to save a couple of bucks. It doesn't make any sense to do that.

So they order people to do that, and some people are calling pure Bolshevik on this appliances. So from this administration, we've seen them go after gas stoves, air conditioning in US with regulation, refrigerators, washing machines, dishwashers,

not water heaters. How many more home appliances will Americans eventually have to replace them because regulation, So just to be clear, when it comes to water heaters and it is proposed, what has been put forward, and if it is enacted, it would not take it into effect until twenty twenty nine. So let's not forget that. No, yeah, we'll got another four or five years, so don't worry about it. Just kick the can down row. We'll take everything away from you power, you know, force you

into electric appliances. You'll pay through the nose for these things and replace stuff that is working just fine. You know you got a water heater, well you need to throw that in the trash and buy a new, expensive one that runs off the electric grid because we're getting ready to shut down the electric grid in five years. This is crazy. These people do not they want to save you money, that's the argument. Now, that's exactly the reason

why you don't want to do this. Look, whether you're talking about canned corn or whether you're talking about appliances. These people don't care about our health, they don't care about our wealth. This is about them and their unending greed for money and for power, and that's all any of this stuff is about. We need we need to push back on this. I've had enough, I hope you've had enough. Let's move on to some other things.

We're gonna have a little bit of fun when we come back, talking about some of the things that are happening just in news in general, some crazy stuff as well. But we're going to take a break here, and I'd like to get some comments from people. Travish, you can feed those back to me. I want to play a new piece that I did here. I didn't do any video cover for it, but I'm curious to see if

anybody recognizes this where it came from. So we're gonna play this for you, and we'll be right back here Newsnow at APS Radio news dot com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story. All right, anybody I name that tune, so let us know and don't see if anybody that. Let's talk about some news here. I thought this was an amazing story. Can't make this up. An emergency slide falls off the Boeing plane.

We talked about that, but it was discovered and outside the home of a lawyer whose firm is suing Bowing. By the way, we just had a second whistleblower die. This one not under as suspicious as circumstances. It'd been sick with an infection type of thing. But still, you know, the whistleblowers are dying left and right. Parts of the plane are falling off that the lawyer is suing. Then had this emergency ramp falls down into the water

outside his lakefront property. I guess. Attorney Jake bissel Lintzk, whose firm is currently sewing Boeing due to one of its planes losing a door plug during a flight in January, discovered the emergency slide from Delta Airlines Fly five twenty washed ashore on some rocks outside his oceanfront home in New York City. So there you go. I guess, like I said before, so why they call it Boeing Because that's the noise the parts make when they fall in the

ground. Jeffrey Tucker talked about the ruination of plane travel. He's somebody I guess who still flies frequently, and he has a lot of issues. And of course my wife and my daughter, whose separate trips that they took on, both of them had issues with plane flights being delayed, canceled, things like that, and they just did you know, one trip, and so okay, Mark Dora, thank you for the tip. Thank you, David for continuing to be the voice of reason. Thank you very much. I

appreciate that. So Jeffrey Tucker says, you know, the best time to write about how horrible plane travel is is when you had one of your planes scheduling disasters that happens with this, he says, when it doesn't happen and your flight goes well, you just don't care about it. But he says, when you're in the thick of it, as I am right now, as I'm writing this, in a thirty six hour international travel time on a nineteen hour delayed domestic flight that just took off, he says, Yeah,

when that happens to he feels like the apocalypse. It's more common now than I can ever remember. I'm at the point of trying not to travel unless I have to, because three of the five of my last trips these days seem to end up this way. So he's had five recent trips and three of them, and our family two trips and both of them. Right.

Yeah. I reached my tipping point on flying a long time ago, even to the extent that when we went to Washington to cover a thing, I said, I'll go, but only if I can take an extra couple of days and drive it myself. And that's what we did. We drove it. I don't want to fly, and that was in two thousand and sixteen. I hate flying. I hate flying because but it used to just be

the interference of the TSA and things like that. Now it's a real safety hazard, really is, he says, Consider the fact that you the three young women who attempting to travel with their foofu fluffy dogs who are their best friends. These dogs are well behave, perfectly gorgeous animals who normally manage just fine unless there's a problem, and when the food runs out and nature calls,

it's another matter. Airports don't really provide areas for dog bathroom breaks, so the dogs and their owners began to panic and cry, it's good things, not Christy Nams. You just shoot shoot the dog, isn't it interesting that the name of her book was no Going Back or something like that. That's it was a one way ticket out of politics for her, wasn't it.

Then you have older people and their medicines and other special needs. They could be shots or otherwise require special conditions, and they might not have enough medication with them, and so then everything gets shut down for a day or whatever. He said. But the most bizarre circumstance affected my flight, he said, I'm landing. Previously, the oxygen masks suddenly fell from the ceiling,

so maintenance had to come and check that out. But of course there is a shortage of those people, and they spend all day running from plane to plane to try to get the little lights to change from red to green. No one really understands how anything works, so you just fiddle with things

until the machine tells you it works. Well, welcome to the new normal that Trump ushered in on us killing people, and you know, the normal of deliberately dumbed down people with these schools and all the rest of the stuff. To show you just how stupid it all is. This is coming out of the UK and it's a luxury fashion brand in the UK called Jordan Luca. Let's hope that it doesn't come here, because what they're selling people are

pre stained genes that look like you just peed your pants. And of course that's what we all want, isn't it. You look at yourself in the mirror and it is like, something's just not right. It doesn't look like I've peed in my pants. And it reminds me of that joke of they told about Lord Nelson. Not not true or sure, but they said, yeah, there's the picture of the pants that you have peed in. I don't know, maybe this is a fashion trend coming from Biden or something.

I guess it depends, but the joke was they say, well, why the British wearing red coats and he says, moles because that way if we get shot, we don't see the blood. It's good for a morale, that type of thing. And then the guy comes in says Lord Nelson, the French Navy, the bulk of it has just come around this island, and he says, fetch me my brown pants. Maybe they're prepping us for

such a moment. You know, everybody's got to have those pants when they break the news to us about what they're doing with the war, or with a dollar, or with the next lockdown or whatever. Jordan Luca is a luxury fashion brand in the UK just introduced their new pre stained genes that look like somebody pete in them, and of course they sold out in minutes,

and they were selling them for eight hundred dollars Canadian. We will never understand the world of fashion and clothing like this makes us really not want to understand it. Well, you know, for the longest time, people have been spending a lot of money to dress like they're poor. Right, what was it even Billy Joel, he hasn't written a song for three decades or something, got to spend a lot of money to let's see, to dress.

I can't remember the lyric now anyway, but you know he was talking about how you had to spend a lot of money to look like you didn't have money. And so people have been, you know, buying more and more jeans with holes in them to look like they're rags and everything. So now I guess we can get soiled pants to look like we are poor and homeless at the same time. So I guess it fits. This is the new normal. And as I was saying before, about the Biden administration making everything

more expensive, all of our appliances and everything. A new Biden energy rule will raise the cost of a new home by thirty one thousand dollars. No problem. You know you don't like that old inefficient homedo. Let's just raise the price of housing by thirty one thousand dollars. It isn't like people are

having any trouble buying homes now, right. I mean you got to I saw the debate on reason about whether or not there ought to be limits or on the amount of houses that the big Wall Street companies can buy, because they are the ones who can afford to buy these houses. Now, as the interest rates stay high and the price of housing continues to go up and up and up, what's driving the cost of houses up A lot of it is regulations like this, just like they drive the price of cars up with

regulations, or the price of water heaters or your hvac. All this stuff is being constantly driven up. It isn't bad enough that they print money, you know, quote unquote, they print regulations to do that. So you know, they tax us with their inflation, but they also tax us with these rules and the rules are there without representation, thirty one one thousand dollars added to the cost of housing to make it even more unaffordable than it is

with his already bad economy. And it's kind of interesting as people are you know, Oh, we're going to be a friend to the average American because we're going to stop these big Wall Street companies from buying up all the houses and turning everybody into renters. It's like, well, your band isn't really going to stop that which you You are interfering with the marketplace by artificially inflating the price of everything, So get your rules off of us so you can

buy cheaper cars and cheaper homes. If it weren't for these rules, you would have many suppliers who would go in and say, well, okay, people can't afford to buy this house, I'll make a cheaper house. No, you can't make a cheaper house because I've got these rules in here, and that's a floor you can't go below that. Meanwhile, on the highways, we're going to have tens of thousands of driverless trucks. Now we're not talking about the battery trucks. They're working on that as well, and that's

also a big issue. That's an issue of practicality as well as something of a hazard. But that's a separate issue the ev stuff. They're pushing out, these self driving cars quote unquote self driving. They're pushing these things out even with the diesel engines there. The key is they want to get rid of the humans who are driving the cars, and they want to put chat

GPT in charge of driving these massive semis here. So again, this is tens of thousands of fully autonomous tractor trailers expected to haul freight on public roads, and upcoming years, the plans are in place to begin with twenty driverless trucks in Texas in twenty twenty four. So nobody behind the wheel of these eighteen wheelers. That's a great idea, isn't it. With twenty five lasers, radar, and camera sensors, the truck can see. Are you impressed

with that? I'm not impressed with it. It can see obstacles on the road from a quarter mile out and then switch to an unobstructed lane without any instruction or manipulation from a human. Can it look to see if there's somebody in that lane accurately within three or four years, Aurora and its competitors expect to put thousands of self driving trucks on America's public freeways and put thousands of drivers out of work. That's their goal. Everywhere you look, this is

what the goal is. The goal is to make everything unaffordable. The goal is to put us out of worth. They're going to make our gradually, iteratively, make our food unaffordable, our homes, our appliances, gradually replace our jobs. And they've been talking about this for a long time. You know, for fifteen years. I've been talking about, Hey, they want to Their schemes are to put us out of work, and they want to condition us with universal basic income. That was another thing that made me so

angry about Donald Trump. I knew that, Yeah, oh you're non essential. We've got to keep the Wall Street companies here, however, and that's always been the plan, always been the plan to replace workers. While the technology makes advances. The average Americans mindset toward an eighty thousand pound truck driving sixty five miles per hour down super highways may not be one of acceptance just yet. According to Triple A's latest survey on the subject, most US drivers

express fear yeah, or uncertainty about fully driverless vehicles. Two thirds of them are afraid of them, and rightfully so. It isn't as if we've seen a perfect record from these other cars, is it. I mean, now we've got Ford being called in for an investigation for their driverless cars. We've seen it with Ford, creuse Way, mow Tesla, all of them. And so we're going to fail up. We're going to continue to you know, if we've got problems with battery fires, well, then we go from

the phones that we're catching fire to the laptops. We go from laptops to the electric bikes, we go from that to the cars, and then we go to the buses and now the tractor trailers. And then we have the battery energy storage sites where have massive collections of batteries to do back up for solar and wind that are already expensive. And each one of these things is a ticking time bomb to start a fire, and it's the same thing with

the driverless side of this. Safety advocates have also been pointing out that almost no federal regulation is currently on the books for autonomous cars and trucks. Isn't that interesting? You know, the FEDS love to regulate everything. They love to regulate our dishwashers, they regulate our hot water heater or anything. But they don't want to regulate the autonomous cars and trucks. Why is that? It seems to me like it'd be, you know, exactly the type of

thing that your bureaucracy would want to expand into. I mean, look at all the new people you could hire, you could build your little empire there regulating these autonomous cars and trucks. Why is it that they have absolutely no

interest in regulating them. Well, for the same reason they have absolutely no interest in regulating vaccines or other pharmaceutical products of that matter, of course, because they're captured, because they're partners, because they're just looking at how they can make money, and hey, if it kills a bunch of us, that's all the better. So as of now, it's to the developers to

determine if the vehicles are safe. Just like when Children Self Defense call up the CDC and said, you know, they're pegilating these particles in the mRNA. Do you realize that a lot of people are going to have going to go into shock with this anaphylactic shock? Oh? Well, you know, says the CDC and the FDA, A call Pfizer and tell them that we

don't care. And Pfizer didn't carry either when they called them. If we put a vehicle on the road that isn't sufficiently safe that we aren't confident in the safety of, then it kills everything else, says the CEO of Aurora. Well, let's hope that it does. But so far it hasn't. Like I said before, we've had way moot, We've had crews and both of them in San Francisco. We've had a lot of these things, but

it hasn't hasn't slowed this down at all. They just keep making bigger and bigger things that are self driving, and bigger and bigger things that have more and more batteries that can catch fire. Just one of those batteries catch fire and it's a chain reaction. And so we had four police officers killed in Charlotte after they went to serve a warrant on an armed felon. Wait a minute, he's got multiple felony convictions and he's a fugitive and he's not allowed

to have a gun. So I guess it'd be safe to serve a warrant on him because you know, it's against the law for this guy to own a gun, so he won't have a gun, right, except that he did because he didn't care about that law any more than they cared about the other laws that they were coming after him for. He was banned from buying and possessing guns as a felon, but he didn't care. So Biden is making a big deal out of this. He's trying to ramp this up so

he can call for gun control. So he's pretending to care about the murder of four police officers. Isn't that interesting? He doesn't care when the police officers are murdered by his mob marching millions, his million man migrants. That's what he should call. The million migrant march. Is what we've got to accept, several million that are coming in. If something like that happens, or he got somebody, you know, some young girl is raped and killed,

he doesn't care about that, won't even mention it. But he wants to be Johnny on the spot because he wants to come after guns. So Biden called on Congress to impose a national red flag law, as well as federal storage mandates for farms. Do you think that would stop this? You know, this is a guy who's got multiple felony convictions. Would that be a red flag? And there's already laws against him having a gun, so

we need to have national red flag laws. Do you think maybe if we have a storage mandate for farms, Oh, that would have stopped him. Yeah, this felon who's not allowed to have guns would have put his gun safely into a storage thing so that he would not have shot at the police. Right. No, he's just trying to public support for doing his gun control by executive order. That is really what he's up to. So meet the lifelong felon who killed four cops in North Carolina. This is from zero

Hedge. They said, you know, he's got a long rap sheet. He was barred from owning or possessing any firearms and so then he I guess took him out of his safe storage that he had and he ambushed a US Marshal's Fugitive Task Force. So he's also a fugitive police officers. As they were serving a warrant, three US Marshals three and an officer from the Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department were killed in a shootout, and four police officers and one

marshal were injured. So he wounded five people killed, four all law enforcement. So I guess, you know, we need to have more gun control laws that'll solve it. As their headge says, has the leftist corporate media identified the fella, Well, no, because it doesn't fit the narrative. CNN hasn't talked about it. Fox News has not talked about it either. According to the police, US Marshalls attempted to serve him a warrant for firearm

possession. He was also wanted for two counts of felony flight to try to get out of the Charlotte area. I guess I didn't see that coming. I've got some comments about the music Guard Goldsmith, John Williams, you got that right, Yeah, you got that right. And John Madison the nineteen eighty four Olympics, you got that right. That's what it's from. Yeah, that's the Olympic fanfare in March. The I guess the march part of it or something like that. Well, again, I was wondering if if

anybody would recognize that. I think they. I don't watch the Olympics, but I think they play it on a pretty regular basis. But I think it was a nineteen eighty four Olympics. I think you're right. I think it was. It was the ones that they had, the one they had in La, because the people in La knew how good John Williams was, so they get him to do their own Olympic thing and it was so good. I think they've kept it every time since then. Regarding the pea pants,

Tommic Doogg says, pea stained pants. Now you can cultivate the homeless look before the government actually makes you homeless. There we go. See, that's it. It's cool to be poor and homeless, and so we take the shame away from it. That's what I guess they're trying to do. And Travis tells me at page six on the News is reporting that the son of Fox News Brett Behar, had to have emergency open heart surgery for a golf ball sized aneurysm. His son is sixteen. I wonder if he took

the jab. You know, we just had a football player who was only retired like a couple of years, still in his late twenties. He died suddenly with this stuff, And of course you know, they're bragging about the fact they're forcing everybody to get the vaccine. In the NFL. Aaron Rodgers famously pushed back against it. But yeah, we're going to talk about that and what's going on with AstraZeneca as well. But thirteen reasons why AR fifteen's

should never be banned. This is by United Liberty dot Com. There's a lot of confusion misinformation by the AR fifteen. Some people believe it's dangerous and deadly weapon has no place in civilian hands. As a matter of fact, when we look at these people on TV, they all treat it as if you know, well, somebody's got the Air fifteen, there's absolutely no way you can stop them. But of course we saw one shooter who did have

an AR fifteen was taken down by a guy with a revolver. And so this whole idea to DEMONI a particular type of firearm, call it an assault weapon because it scares them, I guess says just seeing it is like an assault. The reality is the Air fifteen is versatile, reliable, popular with gun enthusiasts for a variety of reasons. First of all, they said, in spite of what the liberals seem to think it is not automatic. Secondly, it is very commonly used. It is commonly used and widely owned.

It is useful for hunting. Unlike the narratives that you hear from Joe Biden. I remember years ago he was trying to push smart guns when he was vice president. That was going to be his initiative, that he was going to own his little carve out. I remember because we played it a lot. You know, ladies don't get an AR fifteen, get a shotgun, you know, over and under or side by side or something like that.

And so people put up pictures of men who are shooting a shotgun that had never shot a shotgun before, and they didn't realize they needed to put the stock against their arms. So they're obviously you know, newbies and all this stuff or whatever, but it knocking them flat. And then they would show women shooting an AR fifteen because it's got very little recoil. Sports shooting is

also something people use it for. But going back to the hunting thing, you know, Joe Biden also putting out this idea, why do you are the deer wearing a bulletproof vests or something? What do you need that AR fifteen for and it's like, well it's bulletproof, vest I ain't taking the deer down anyway with any of this stuff. Useful also for self defense for

many of these same reasons. It's an educational tool, they point out, because it is easily customized, so it's a good platform for teaching gunsmithing and firearm modification, which the ATF really hates. Precision is very good. Again, it's customable. That's they already had that in there for before. But it's got a lot of safety features that you might not have on some other rifles. It has a big economic impact for the firearms industry because so many

people buy and own them. It is a historical significance. I did not realize that this has been in production since the nineteen sixties. I guess it took it a while for it to catch on, but it's been around for quite some time. And I think a lot of people think in the a lot of leftists think the AR is for automatic rifle or something, but it's not. It's armor light, it's range of use for civilian sports shooting, for hunting, and all the rest of the stuff. And here's number thirteen.

It's a constitutional right, that's the one that matters. Of course, I guess they could have been in fourteen. According to Christinome, it's great for shooting dogs. But we won't jug about that. I mean, what did what an idiot? I mean, does she not remember how Mitt Romney got harangued for putting a dog talking about how he had put a dog on the top of his station wagon or something, I forget the details over there were moving or something like that, and everybody realized, what what did she

think when to put something like that in there? Absolutely tone deaf and stupid. Texas detective says, turning off your phone means that you're either the victim of a crime or you're probably in the process of committing one. Yeah, because I guess if you don't want Big Brother watching you, just like in nineteen eighty four. You know, if you are trying to sneak around the corner so the Big Brother camera can't see what you're doing, you must be

doing something wrong. And that's what he said. This is a guy who, evidently, I don't follow the crime blog stuff, but evidently the case of Moe Wilson, who was a cyclist and she was a kill by Caitlin

Armstrong. It was just convicted and sentenced to ninety years in prison. The detective was interviewed on CBS News. So when compiling the evidence and piecing together the string of events to determine who the murderer was, how, when and why it was committed, apparently one of the tip offs was the murderer lied about her phone's battery dying the night Armstrong carried out the murder. Isn't it

interesting how all these detectives are conspiracy theorists in a sense. Right, They have an idea as to how the crime was committed and then they looked to see if that really was it. But they they come up with these theories about what happened, and that's the basis of their investigation. But you're not

supposed to do that with the government either. However, this is not found to be true and the phone had been deliberately turned off, and this was a red flag for the detectives making the statements that in this day and age, if someone turns off their phone or takes it off of a network, that it most likely means that the person is a victim of a crime or a criminal themselves. Have they never heard of people putting their phone in airplane

mode so they they don't get bothered with the radiation while they're sleeping. Seriously, I guess we have to be asleep if we don't see the surveillance state coming. These people are moving it in every direction right now. You're either a victim or you are committing a crime if you don't have your phone on it should be constantly reporting to these people. I mentioned earlier that Ford is getting into trouble with their self driving thing they call Blue Crews. But yeah,

let's go ahead and open up the gates for these semi trailers. There have been two fatal crashes with Blue Cruise as a driver assistance them, and they've already had two separate fatal crashes, both of them occurring at night. But wait a minute, don't they have radar and laser and all the rest of this stuff. Remember when when that self driving car that was I think

it was an ubercar. They were practicing with it in Phoenix and there was a homeless woman who was jaywalking and she you see, it's got a camera looking forward, and it's got a camera looking at the human driver who was not doing anything other than sitting there playing with the phone, playing a game or something with the phone until the bump bump of running over the jaywalking homeless person. And they put that out in their first excuseise, well you can

see this person. You couldn't see him, and they just as soon as they came into the headlights. That was too late. And everybody said, well, wait a minute. It doesn't navigate with visual light. It's got light ar all these other things there. It should have seen that, seen her coming, and it should have applied the brakes. Why didn't it do that? And then as people continue to ask questions, it comes out that they had had problems with the emergency braking kicking on and so they just disabled

it because it wasn't functioning right. So, yeah, the crashes at night that killed two separate crashes that killed two different people. With the Blue Crews Driver assist it was introduced in twenty twenty one. It's supposed to offer hands free driving assistance on pre mapped divided highways. Unlike Tesla's Autopilot, Blue Crews has a more restricted operational design domain. They call that odd. I think

it is odd anyway. That's the acronym incorporates an infrared driver monitoring system to ensure drivers keep their eyes on the road, except it doesn't always work as advertised, like most of this stuff. And then finally, here how robots making your burgers and fries can lead to greater income inequality. Now this is from the La Times, and this is an article that's picked up by Drudge, so you can imagine that it's got kind of a leftist tilt to it

in some regards. But it is interesting because they understand, as I was saying, that Gavin Newsom's minimum wage law was really about putting robots in these fast food restaurant chains. You know, it used to be that when I was growing up, we had kids in high school. I mentioned it that I worked a little bit at Red Lobster, but I had other jobs. But you know, I mentioned it when Red Lobster was going out of business.

But all the kids that I knew in high school, we all had jobs, and we use those jobs to buy cars because that was our ticket to ride, our ticket for freedom. And yet what do we see now. You know, for the longest time, the entry level jobs like working at a fast food place or something like that, have gone to illegal immigrants who come in and they're content to I guess, work at these fast food

jobs for the rest of their life. You know, something that was typically just viewed to being an entry level thing, and now it's become something that people do and continue to do that they don't move on to some other job. It's not just something that high school kids are doing. And now we see that that is moving and being replaced. Those people are being replaced the cheap labor that these corporations wanted it. That's why they open up the border.

They want to get people coming in that even though it's very cheap compared to what Americans are thinking, it is much more than they were making in the country where they came from. But now those people are going to be pushed out by robots. And this has been the progression that we've seen for a long time, seen this coming. And so then what do those people

do when they're pushed out of this job with robots. So now you know, high school kids are not getting any work experience or work ethic, they're not getting cars independents. Instead, we're going to have robots. And that's what this is about. How robots making your burgers and fries can lead to greater income inequality and just keep people from having any upward mobility at all.

On April the first, it wasn't interesting that Newsom did this on April Fool's Day, raising significantly, raising, you know, by thirty percent, one third. They went from fifteen dollars an hour to twenty dollars an hour, just for the fast food chains that are national, because he's trying to push them and go them into making the economic decision to use robots in the kitchen.

And we see now a lot of different robots that have the manual dexterity and the smarts to be able to do I showed you one the other day. It was chopping up food. It was flipping pancakes in the pan, opening bottles and things like that. And so they're at the point now where they can start replacing some of the labor, and he wants to give them a financial incentive to do that, because that's what he's really concerned about helping.

He's not concerned about helping the people that are at the bottom who are working in fast food. He wants to help the Silicon Valley companies sell robots and so on. April fools, more than half a million fast food workers in California got a raise up to twenty dollars an hour. That same week, the self proclaimed world's first autonomous restaurant opened its stores for business in Pasadena. So, yeah, he's not trying to help people at the bottom.

He's trying to help the elites up at the top, the technocrats. Fast food franchise owners are struggling to stay afloat amid rising labor costs because he's jacking them up, leading many of them to consider automation as the only viable solution.

That's why he's pushing the big chains. He said. If this is a chain, even if you don't own eighty stores, even if you're a franchising and you've got three or four stores, if you're a McDonald's franchising where they got eighty more than eighty stores worldwide, then you're going to be covered by this. To make sure that McDonald's is going to come up with some

kind of a robot program that everybody will be forced to buy into. This person says I studied low wage industries in la including the effects of new technology and workers. My research shows how automation does not always lead to greater efficiency and cost cutting for businesses, as AI boosters would like the public and policymakers

to believe. No, it actually makes more money for the people who are selling robots this kind, and they don't sell them, They're going to rent them, okay, because that's the key to really getting wealthy, not selling something but leasing it so that you will never own anything. That is a big part of the new normal for them. This kind of innovation also promises to further income inequality. Working people deserve to have their voices heard and determining

how, where, when or whether AI and automation should be used. This person is writing from the perspective that the unions are going to fix this for us. I will talk about that in a moment here. I was eager to visit Cali Express, the new roboticized Pasadena restaurant, to learn what the future of fast food looked and tasted like. Outside, there were slogans befitting a traveling circus, AI frying robot, Marvel, it's not a flying robot.

That's what my son wanted when he was little. They didn't watch TV much at all, and so we asked him when he has only said what do you want for Christmas? And he said, I want a flying robot? So what else do you want? But if he could imagine it, he thought he could get it. AI frying Robot Marvel the same son in the start. We go to a restaurant, Chinese restaurant. We used to

go there all and there's a local restaurant, small local restaurant. And you know, he was maybe about four years old or something, and he liked to wear his Batman costume and we'd let him wear it anywhere. You know, we didn't care. You want to go grocery shopping with Batman? Sure, So he let him wear it to the restaurant because he wanted to.

And so he's sitting there and the waiter, who was Chinese, came over and he goes, you're gonna fry, and he says what He goes, You're gonna fry, and he looks at us and he says, I don't know what he's saying. Anyway, it's so they have an Ai frying robot Marvel. So I don't know if it's flying or frying. But anyway, my curiosity peaked. I entered and passed by a facial recognition scanner advertising the ominous sounding opportunity to pay with your face. That great, you can pay

with your face. So yeah, that's basically what you're doing on social media. You know, you're paying with your face for Facebook, the dumb efforts, as he said, the dumb facebookers is what he was calling them. Actually right, But you pay with your face, you pay with your privacy, You pay dearly to use those social media things. Anyway, he says, I went through and I placed my order on a giant touchscreen, watched

a human worker spring into action behind the counter. They rushed to load up robots with raw beef and frozen fries, and they scrambled around the kitchen retrieving cooked items that the robots had deposited in the buckets. Then this person manually assembled, packaged, and delivered the food to waiting customers. A second worker cleaned up after the robots. Well there you go. Isn't that great?

Sounds like really fulfilling work, doesn't it. I mean, you know, cooking short or cook or whatever, cooking this stuff that's not really a challenging thing necessarily, but you know, certainly does beat just having to be the person who keeps stacking the frozen fries into the robot area. As all this is happening, an animatronic arm put on a show reminiscent of a Kookie science fare project, hastily dunking a fry basket into a vat of hot oil.

The workers toiled away in the background doing the majority of the work. See, that's the key thing that I thought was interesting about this, Just like the walkout store just walk out stores of Amazon, right said, there's a lot of smoke, mirror and fraud involved in a lot of this stuff.

You know, Jeff Bezos didn't have some magical technology there, kind of a dog and pony show like what Tesla was pulling himself, Nicola Tesla, Yeah, one hundred and twenty years ago, where there's a little remote control robot. Yeah, just talk to it, ask it questions and it'll link back the answers to you. He had somebody with a remote control. They had never seen a remote control, they didn't, I didn't know what was going

on with it, but they were very impressed. And so that was kind of you know what Jeff Bezos and Amazon All Foods were doing with their just walk out stores. They had one thousand Indians watching people shop and totaling it up and then pretending that it was all automated. One little Indian, ten little Indians, a thousand little Indian shoppers there, he says, the lofty promises of new tech can be used as a pretense for restructuring industries and infrastructure,

often at the expense of workers, consumers in the community. And again it's because the only concern is the wealth for the very very few, he says. Not only is this not a great deal for the workers, he said, consumers end up paying more for less. As automation requires high levels of standardization and fast food, what this means is smaller menus and not as

much minimal customization. Food prices will continue to skyrocket, just as they have of the last decade, far out pacing the rate of inflation and boosting corporate profits to unprecedented new heights. He said, my order at Cali Express, he just ordered a burgern of fries that was the extent of their menu. PEPSI right, that type of thing. It came out to fifteen dollars and forty four cents, which is more than double the same order at In and

Out Burgers. Where they can make it a lot of different ways, because you're dealing with people. As profits boom for these multinational conglomerates, local franchises may feel pressured by the franchise company to automate, but to fully renovate a commercial kitchen requires enormous and risky capital investment, plunging already struggling small businesses into

new debts. So who actually gains from all of this stuff The new class of techno middlemen who are going to lease the hardware and they're going to have subscription based software because you will own nothing. Even the people who are the business owners who have the franchises and things like that, they won't own this stuff. They'll be leasing it from the big guys. You know, they have known for the longest time that's the way to make money. You know,

we had, as I've said before, we had video stores. We opened up in nineteen eighty six. And then when they started pushing everybody pushing for control the movie studios, we wanted to get control, and of course the key ones to push for that control was Paramount, who summed A.

Redstone who owned Viacom. Viacom was a holding company for Paramount but they also bought Blockbuster, okay, and so you know, Vicom owned a lot of different things, CBS, Paramount, Blockbuster, a lot of those things, and so they wanted to establish all the movie studios wanted to establish a situation where they never gave up ownership of the movies. They always just rented them.

And so they wanted to have a pay per view rental thing or they put the stuff there, and you know, and it made it very difficult for anybody to make money off of it if they bought into that situation. But they use the pressure and the financial clout of Paramount to push that. Even though Blockbuster never made any money off of that Blockbuster after Paaramount took it. It was profitable before they bought it, but after it was bought by

Viacom never made any money. I just saw the other day that now Sumner Redstone, who was a CEO at the time, he's died and his daughter is there. But Paramount's gone out of business now, and other movie studios are having a lot of problems as well. You know, Warner Brothers is having a lot of problems. So it's the but they wanted to drive everybody out of business. They wanted to make sure that they got all of the money, which is what they do with the movie theaters as well. But

they're putting out a business as well. You know, you look at the movie theaters. Way they can make any money is off of selling popcorn and concession stands because they take almost all the ticket price and they keep all that money for themselves. And they don't own the movie. They just rent it for a short period of time, and so they are allowed to you know, they have a deal set up with them. They don't even own the posters and the standees that they put in a lobby about the movies. That

all goes back to the studios. Truly is amazing. It's about total control. And that's the way these multinational corporations, these these large Wall Street corporations, that's the way they operate. They don't want you to own anything. And you look at the software models of Adobe and other ones. How you know they don't want to sell it anymore. They want you to rent it

constantly from them. It's a leasing agreement. The companies developing the technology have raised billions of dollars to impose their solutions quote unquote onto the unwitting public. And how do they do that, typically with the help of the government partnering with them banning what their competitors are doing are banning what has always been out there, you know, just like we're talking about with food with meat and other things like that. This is what the technocracy wants. Now, up

to this point, I'm pretty much in agreement. And this is where we go separate ways with this article, because he thinks that, fortunately, California has a reputation for taking bold policy action. So this guy sees the California government as having a solution to all this, and the California government as being the ally of the little guy. Nothing could be further from the truth.

They said, they are established the state's first sectoral bargaining councils. So are the unions going to save us or are they just another layer of parasites and cronyism. And it's this partnership between government and the corporations is really dangerous. Newsom's recent executive order, this guy likes this. It's an executive order mandating AI powered overhaul of state government operations and public services is one example. Yeah,

so he's going to fix this. He's going to use AI for state government operations and public services, which is another one of the plans of the technocracy. It's what Bill Gates has always been pushing in India with the Oddear system. Let me help you to impose an ID on all the citizens. We've seen it there in India, the Odhar system, We've seen Ukraine talking about how, yeah, when the war's over, we're going to have anything that you do with a government, you're going to have to have. It's

going to be so convenient. You're gonna love this. We're going to have this digital ID and an app, and so instead of having to go stand in line at the Department of Motor Vehicles, you just use your app and you're all done. Except they're going to be taking away your ability to drive and everything else. They're going to be surveilling you everywhere you go. They're going to require an ID. So this is how we get suckered into these

things. Again, this is an LA Times opinion piece, So it was interesting until the very end, at which point absolutely goes off the rails. We'll be right back. Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass aps radio has you covered check out a wide variety of channels on our app at apsradio dot com. J are listening to the David Knight Show. All right, welcome back. Let's talk a little bit about the pharma issue, and we've

had some developments from big pharmaceutical companies. Johnson and Johnson is now proposing to pay six and a half billion dollars to resolve almost all of the ovarian cancer lawsuits based on people who use their baby powder. And it's not just ovarian

cancer, course or respiratory issues as well. With that. The key thing is that with this talcum powder, they knew for a very long time about this, and they continued to advertise it anyway, and then after it became more prevalent, they stopped the advertising, but they continued to sell it,

kind of the same type of thing they did with opioids. And of course we know about the Sackler family and Produe Pharmaceutical and how much money they made and how ruthless the marketing of that was everywhere, and yet they were actually using Johnson and Johnson to manufacture it for them. That's why I said, you know, when Trump brought them in in twenty twenty, I said,

you realize that the history of this company. Of course, you know, most of them have got a long list of criminal lawsuits and charges against them, just like the banks do. But you know, it was almost as if Trump had come in with Johnson and Johnson. It's like, you know, I know, you got these problems of the opioid stuff, and you got problems with the baby powder stuff. How about we get you into a business where you've got an a liability. I can set you up with vaccines.

And they did. They got them allied with another small vaccine company. They turned over factories to them. We've seen this type of thing before as well. I talked about it with chabonni yogurt. This guy comes in and Chuck Schumer and Kristin Gilbrand get him a factory in New York to make yogurt. Isn't that nice When you got friends in the federal government, they can just give you factories at discount prices like that set you up in business.

What do they want in return? Well, in this particular case, it was immigration base. But going back to this, the subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson is proposing to pay nearly six and a half billion dollars to resolve nearly all the talk ovarian cancer lawsuits brought against the company. They said it would resolve about nine nine point seventy five percent of the pending lawsuits brought against it

and its affiliates over the allegations. It also announced in twenty twenty two that it would stop selling its talk based baby powder in twenty twenty three, amid the ongoing legal battles over the product. Think about that. I mean, for decades they continued to do it, and then when they finally come out and say in twenty twenty two, well, we'll stop selling it a year from now, A year from now. Isn't that amazing that they continued to

do it that long? Isn't it amazing that somebody would continue to market and sell some kind of a health product long after the harm was known? Does that sound familiar? What's going on with all the vaccines. As a matter of fact, we look at what is happening in Canada and the UK. They're now as to the point where the harm has now been shown and has come out in both Canada and the UK. However, it's about Astrazenica.

Astrazenica evidently was not as well connected politically as Pfizer Moderna. This was the Astrazenica vaccine, was the one that came out of the UK. Astrazenica was a company and they partnered with Oxford University to put this thing out, and they never allowed it in the United States, not because they were concerned about

safety, of course, just they didn't have a political constituency here. But it was pretty obviously not a safe vaccine and they just didn't have the political clout to keep that thing going, so they shut it down in most countries eventually, And now you've got Canada and the UK looking at people who were harmed by this Astrazenica vaccine. They have admitted it now in court that it harmed people and was killing people, but still they're dragging their feet on any

compensation. Canada's COVID vaccine injury program so far is only paid out six percent of the claim so far, so that's like one out of every seventeen claims. And they're not paying much money either. Only one hundred and thirty eight of the twenty two hundred and thirty three claims made so far have been approved for payout, and the amounts that they're paying people are paltry sums Trudeau, as a matter of fact, recently tabled a twenty twenty four budget that earmarked

an extra thirty six million dollars for the program. He doesn't want to pay people for the vaccine that he pushed people pushed on people. Isn't it amazing? Some people who are successful in getting payouts have said that the compensation awarded was insufficient considering the injuries. Forty two year olds Reightman from Whiteman from British Columbia had a lawsuit against astra Zenica and the federal government of Canada and the

government of his providence and the pharmacy at which he was injected. But he's not getting much of anything from any of them. He received the astra Zenica shot in April of twenty twenty one. Shortly after that he became totally paralyzed. He was subsequently diagnosed with Gion Bray syndrome. This has been a very long known side effect of many different vaccines, going back to the nineteen seventies when they had the swine flu and that fake pandemic of the swine flu and

the vaccine that harmed so many people. Remember we had the sixty minutes thing by Mike Wallace, Chris Wallace's father, and the person one of the key people that he interviewed in that had been paralyzed with gion brace and home and was gradually getting back use of her legs, but she was never going to be able to do anything other than walk with braces and things like that. This has been around for a long time, but we've never seen it to

the extent that we saw it in this. So we've had all of these typical vaccine injuries, but far far worse than we'd ever seen them before, plus all of the new types of injuries. Whitman was given a one time payout of two hundred and fifty thousand dollars and about ninety thousand dollars a year in income replacement. That's going to be eaten up with inflation given the extent of the permanent, life changing injuries. A couple one hundred thousand dollars isn't

much, he says, that's for sure. The federal government is also a Canadian federal government is also continuing to purchase COVID shots. Isn't that amazing? Continuing to purchase them even though nobody wants the boosters anymore? And this is something else that we've scene over and over again. They continue to buy this stuff and they continue to buy. We see this, We saw this in

Australia. It is also the case in other countries that they buy ten times the case that what people are complaining about with Ursula fond of Lye and the EU, she bought ten times the doses of vaccine as the population, just like they did in Australia. It's like they're planning, and we reported this when it happened. I reported it when it happened. We had I said, think about how many of these shots they want to get people. They're

buying ten times the number of people that they've got. They're not going to hit you just one in two times. The UK government again caught playing hardball over the vaccine injury payouts as the victims legal bills mount. And again this is AstraZeneca, and this is another forty something father who was young, healthy, out a family was supporting them, working, fighting for their lives and

having life altering injuries. Jamie Scott is nothing if not a fighter. He must be to have survived a reaction to his Trump shot so violent that hospital doctors phoned his wife three times to tell her to get to his bedside because he was about to die, but each time he pulled through. Actually,

this is not a trump shot. This is the Astrazenica shot. Fit and healthy before the jab, the forty seven year old father of two has suffered a permanent brain injury that prevents him from working or even being able to look after his children on his own for anything more than an hour. The battle to stay alive was one, however, it was just the beginning. He is now struggling to do anything in his life. And so hang on a

second. Just lost my spot here. I haven't got this memorized, so I wanted to read this next section two, and I'm having trouble finding it here. Oh I do know, you know, maybe should play some music

here anyway. This week, AstraZeneca has confirmed a couple of things. First, one is that they're going to pay their CEO eighteen point seven million pounds in compensation, and the UK Telegraph obtained court documents that showed the pharmaceutical firm was admitting for the first time in legal proceedings that its vaccine can quote in very rare cases. Oh, they got that. That's a fauci thing. It's rare, you know, it's rare and very rare cases. It can

cause an illness which is fatal about twenty percent of the time. So once't you get this illness, it is not rare to die from it. When it's symptoms of blood clots and low blood plate counts are not deadly, it leaves the victims of devastating injuries. In these same legal documents, AstraZeneca accepts that it has no idea why the vaccine developed in conjunction with the University of

Oxford, has no idea why the vaccine should do that. Well, see, this is why we have tests, right, this is why they would go through three phases of testing so that you would know if it was harmful and so that you would know that it was actually causing this problem. But they did it at warp speed because they skipped the testing. They said, the causal mechanism is not known, said the company, Well, I think we do know the cause of all this. I think this is caused by

politicians, don't you. I mean, I don't have to go with it to get a microscope to figure out this is caused by politicians who forced this on us. And if we know anything at all about history and documents and what these people have been doing for the last twenty plus years, we know exactly why they did this. There was politicians who did this, and no doubt about it. On Rumble, Foggy Trail says, I've been posting about vaccines for over fifteen years. Yeah, and my in laws thought I was

nuts. They still think I'm crazy, even though several of them have helped issues from the COVID jab That's a shame. You just can't get through to people like that. On Rumble, Michael de Silvio, my coworker vomited and lost control of his vowels as soon as he was jabbed. Later that night he had a stroke. It's just and it's covered up, isn't it right? It's covered up. They wanted everybody to believe that this is unrelated,

that it was a fluke, that this wasn't happening to anybody else. This is why when we look at freedom of speech, it's not just an abstract thing. It is fundamental. It is the way that we we defeat this tyranny. Is a freedom of speech and being able to talk to and communicate with each other. That's why that is the key thing they want to shut down, and it's why it's such a betrayal what Mike Johnson and these other people are doing to take these riots that are happening and say, well,

they've had too much to say, We got to shut down. What people say, you've had too much to think, You've had too much to say, not gonna let you talk about this stuff anymore. So the legal mess has been made more complicated in the UK because the government indemnified Astrasenica. In other words, they got immunity. The people they jabbed didn't get immunity,

but they got legal immunity for the harm that they caused. So it indemnified Astrosenica and other COVID vaccine makers ahead of the mass roll out, and of course they planned that for the longest time. First thing, Fauci did give them for the childhood vaccines in nineteen eighty six, and then in two thousand

and five as part of the PREP Act. George W. Bush, who was there with nine to eleven and the Patriot Act and the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act and all the rest of the stuff, he made sure that there was even more immunity given to people for these vaccines will be rolled out as part of a massive pandemic or something, and so he made sure that you know, there's going to be nothing, no liability for the companies or

for the government that was a co conspirator in all of this. In the legal case, Master Zeneca is accused of playing hardball, but it is unclear whether behind the scenes the UK Treasury is bulking at any payout. But for the victims, it just prolongs their agony. That's exactly right. And so

when we look at the side effects that are there. You know, as I point out and I correct that, I was talking about rimdservir and saying that it was a liver thing because I'd seen a lot of people have been had liver injury, and you can find a lot about rimdsiviet injuring people's liver. But I had a listener who said, well, no, it's the kidneys are the main thing. Now I looked up and he's like, yeah, they're right, that is the main thing, but also comes after your

liver as well. It's like these vaccines, so is the main thing the blood clots? Is it? Anaphylectic shock? Is it the myocarditis and the paracarditis. Is it the long amyloid blood clots, long white, scringy rubbery things that accumulate, and we go on and on with all these different symptoms. Yeah, it's all the above. And which one is the main way to kill people? I'm not sure actually which one is the main death thing.

I mean, we've got a lot of people dying, so but that could be from the blood clots, or it could be from the myocarditis. It could be from a lot of different things. I think it is the myocarditis. I think people have that and they don't realize until they go out and exercise strenuously, just you know how fragile their heart was. And that's why it's you know, young people are dropping dead suddenly, young athletes. But we got another symptom now coming from the trump shots, and this is

an elevated risk of eye inflammatory disorder. And I thought this is very interesting because you know, earlier we were talking about cow flu. They want to call it now, right, the bird flu avian flu. Oh, well, we've had one case and a human being where it jumped from the bird to the cow and then jumped from the cow to the human and what did the human get? Got a red redness in their eye, And then it was reported by some other people as conjunctividis pink eye. Right, that's not

a big deal. Really, Now there is something that looks like pink eye, which is more serious. Pink eye conjunctiveis is an external inflation infection of your eye, whereas this other condition is you euvedis is an internal inflammation inside of the eye, and that's more difficult to treat, so it's more serious. But they have many of the same symptoms, and so it can be difficult to distinguish if somebody has got pink eye or if they got euveitis.

One is external, the other is internal, but they look the same, same symptoms. So I'm thinking, so this person who got one person supposedly, and again that tells you that as widespread as they claim the bird flu is, if only one person has shown up with it, that's probably not what that one person has. Just thinking critically here and what else might have caused this, because now they're saying that this euvitis, which can look like

pink eye, is another symptom of COVID vaccination. They found that seventeen percent of nearly a half million people who had been vaccinated four hundred and seventy four thousand who have a history of uveitis and a recurrence within one year after a vaccination, So not only do you get it from it, but it can come back later after you've been vaccinated again. It is an inflammation inside the eye that occurs in the immune system is fighting an affection or something like that.

So if you get the shot, you might get the eye infection, and then later on, if you're fighting another infection because it's damaged your immune system, you may wind up getting this. And they found it in about seventeen percent of the people and it can look like pink eye. So is this person that they're claiming that caught the bird flu from a cow or drink the bat soup from a penguin? Is this really another vaccine symptom that this

guy had. Of the four hundred and seventy four thousand individuals including in the study, cumulative incidents of post vaccination u itis was eight point six percent at three months, twelve point five percent at six months, seventeen percent at one year. In other words, is going up postfactine? You know? Long after you got the vaccine, it's going up and it was primarily of the

anterior type, which is at the front of the eye. So again it's going to look very much like pink I. And then we have a pfizergate with Ursula fond of Lyne, proving as this headline says that she can get away with anything. This is our t talking about the fact that she had

all these dodgy communications with Albert Borla of Pfizer. They were texting back and forth, and eventually she wound up signing a contract where she bought ten doses for every European at the expense of the European Union, and she profited from it. And she was also pushing out the QR Code to require people to have proof of vaccination to do anything, you know, the vaccine passport, And so people want to know what's going on with this massive amount of money.

It was four point six billion vaccines that she bought, seventy one billion euros of public money that she gave to her friends and big pharma, and yet somehow, first of all, she wasn't really interested in showing them the text messages between her and Borla, and then they just somehow disappeared. We don't really know what happened with it. But isn't this interesting? Ten doses for every European she bought. And we saw the same thing in Australia,

ten doses for every Australian. Wow, I remember talking about that in twenty twenty. The fact that hey, this thing is, they're not looking to end any of this stuff anytime soon. And un rumble atomic dog says, my sister in law was paralyzed by blood clots. I'm very sorry, can't walk now. Oh refuses to believe that it was a jab. It's sad. The blood clots do not run in the family. Yeah. Well, you know, a lot of times it's difficult for people to you know,

they don't want to believe that there's anything that they did. Even if they were fooled, they would not want to do that. Other people, on the other hand, it was like, you know, fool me once, Okay, now I'm onto you, and that's going to be the thing that's going to help us. The fact that people have looked at this now this is and I saw this come up yet again. This was just released yesterday. A renowned scientist said all COVID vaxed people will die in three to five

years. Now. I've heard this, and I've heard other people quote. I've heard Alex quote this as well. Even though this person is a world renowned scientist, I don't go on credentials, and I think that they've got very good reason to say that. There's going to be a lot of stuff that's going to continue to increase. The cancer is going to increase, it's

going to continue to accelerate. We're going to see other issues like infertility, even pink eye coming back, you know, an eye infection coming back and getting more and more frequent as time goes by, over every six month period. I think we're going to continue to see this and people are going to just discount it and say, well, I don't know, is it the food? Is it? This? Is it? Five G? What is it? You know? We don't know. Well, I think I think

this poison is is just going to keep doing this. It's damaged a lot of people's immune system. It is persistent, and a lot of people have gotten a lot of jabs with this as well. But I don't know that we should go this absolutist on anything, and so I don't agree with this that everyone who's been vaccinated with the COVID shots will die within three to five

years. That's what the person said, going back to twenty twenty one, which would mean at the mean point, you know, that would be four years, that would be in twenty twenty five, kind of center of it. And I, you know, I don't believe and I'm not saying that everybody's going to die, but I think it's going to really accelerate. And I think it's very interesting. And we've talked about this briefly in the past,

the degal thing. You know, there's really strange that person had connections with the CIA who put that up, and you know it really it's like, why what is this about? Who is this person? Why are they putting this up, and why are they talking about the number of people that are going to die by different countries And of course the US is a few of the places they said population was going to go up, but in the United States said it was going to be radically reduced by about two thirds.

The UK almost as bad. Who took the lead in these vaccines, Trump, Boris Johnson, other people like that, this person with CIA. Of course you know, working with these intelligent intelligence agencies that are part of the English speaking five countries, maybe they knew what they were going to be pulling off. And when you look at this, you know it was not the you know, the pandemic. The health threat was always the shot. The

shot was the bioweapon. All this stuff about the labs and everything is at this point a red herring. And so when you look at that, I don't think that you can say that everybody who got vaccinated with even a single shot is going to die. I don't think that's going to be the case. It's never the case. It's one of the reasons why you can get away with stuff like this, because you look at this and how people will react to being exposed to stuff that will kill one person. The other person

may not even get sick. That's one of the reasons why it's difficult to prove this stuff. And when it gradually rolls out over a period of time, and when it continues to get more and more intense in terms of the people who are harmed by it, that is something else that makes it difficult for people to get this. But it was a Professor Cahill, doctor Delores Cahill out of Germany, whose work includes how proteins and antibodies can be used

by medical applications, including in biomarker discovery, diagnostics, personalized medicine. And I think she worked with the Max Planck Institute of Molecular Genetics in Berlin, Germany from nineteen ninety six two thousand and three, has several international patents in this field, So clearly technically she knows what she's talking about. But I think that anybody can make a mistake, and I think if you're looking at the medicine side of this, epidemiological side of this, not no matter what

you're talking about, it's not going to kill everybody. But again, we need to understand what has been pulled on us. And that's the thing that continues to gnaw at me that Biden and Trump and all of these Republican and Democrat congress people who all had a hand in this are not being held to account. And again we're not doing anything to stop the elevation of this from the state and federal governments to the international level with the who. I think

the best thing that we could do is to start contacting. We talked about this this week Jay and Jessica contact me by email and said, Hey, we need to put this stuff out and start pushing on state representatives to withdraw some of these powers. And I think we probably could even do that, perhaps at the local level, because there are local public health places of public health. The bureaucrats who have been some of them better, some of them

worse than others. But these regulations that were put out in December of two thousand and one after the anthrax attack and nine to eleven all the rest of this stuff, these are the things that if we destroy that, I think we could cut off this pandemic being imposed from above, and that includes at the global level especially. I think it had cut it off for the federal

government, had cut it off of the state government. If the state government would cut it off those regulations and cut it off for the federal government and certainly for the international government, have a good day. BIS and false neoze has become all too common social media. First, unfortunately exactly, this is greatly dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.

This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Break free from the usual script with The David Knight Show a fresh perspective bringing you genuine insights on current events. But if the show is going to stay on the air, we'll need your continued support. Sharing the show, subscribing and even just hitting the

like button all help. And if you found our show health, please consider donating and becoming a part of a community that values the truth because independent, listener funded news untouched by corporate globalist agendas, is extremely important to our liberties.