Thr 29Feb24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show. As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday, the twenty ninth of February.

Here of our Lord twenty twenty four. Well, on this extra day of February, we're going to begin by talking about the history of not just the pandemic, but the guy who really was there from the very beginning, and I mean the very beginning two thousand and one, nine to eleven, alex Azar, the guy that Trump put in as head of HHS, who did his emergency order before Trump, and he has a very long history going back

to nine to eleven, going back to the anthrax attack. Yes, he was the guy who is the guy the beginning and the end, the alpha and omega of this whole scam that ran for twenty years. But we're going to begin with the news and talking about what is happening with gun control. Will be right back. Well, the headline says the Supreme Court appears to

be split over a ban on bump stocks enacted under Trump. What headline is this? You'll never see Trump's name mentioned with any of this stuff. At Bright barter En four wars, you name it, w nd All. The conservative me, they will not associate him with these types of things. And so who was it that did this? I saw this, I clicked on

it is that New York Times. Yeah, the left. Well, they're proud of the fact that he worked with them on gun control, as he promised to do, as he went around the table with the late Diane Feinstein Frankenstein and hey, I can do something. It's gonna make Diane happy. Well, I guess she's I don't know if she's happy where she is right now. Not. Justice is wrestled with the mechanics of gun triggers and the larger implications of the band, both for bumpstock owners and for the public.

See that's the key. It's not about the mechanics of firing a gun. It's about the larger implications of a ban, a ban being done by the executive the first time that any president had the audacity to infringe the Second Amendment. They usually leave those privileges in the past to Congress or to the judiciary, and unfortunately it was a very bad precedent by President Trump. The justices appeared to be split largely along ideological lines over the band, which prohibits the

sale in the possession of bump stocks. You see, that's why you had to have Trump. You know that all hell would have broken loose if it had been Hillary Clinton who had done this. If Hillary Clinton had come in and said, I'm going to sign an executive order to do gun control. Can you imagine what the reaction would have been. Do you think that the NRA would have taken a pass as they did when it was Trump. Prahps Wayne LaPier was too basically taking vacations on his private jets. But the gun

owners of America were not asleep. And now that was Michael Cargill of Central Texas Gun Works. Got a good guy in Austin and he's got a gun store there. He ran for local office. Unfortunately, the people of Austin are not wise enough to elect somebody like Michael Cargill. But he is fighting this all the way up to the Supreme Court, and it needs to be fought. And it was a shame that the NRA took a pass on it.

But the gun owners of America understood this is important. As a president, the implications of a ban being done by the president much much worse than something that's done, you know, an infringement of the Second Amendment. An infringement essentially of our God given rights is what it's about that they're prohibited from doing as a condition of their office. Anybody who has federal office as a congressman, federal office as a judge, they take an oath as a condition

of their office not to infringe our God given rights. And yet they do. But when it can be done by one individual, rather than trying to have to get a consensus on a court or consensus in a Congress, it's much much more dangerous what Trump did. The case does not turn on the Second Amendment right to keep them bear arms, says Reason. And Reason is absolutely dead wrong about this. Their reason is as wrong about this as they

are about the First Amendment. And they've chimed in on that again as well. Reason has jumped in on the side of the corporations, saying corporations should be able since their people. You know, they're people too, Yeah, they're an entity. As a matter of fact, corporations are better than you and I. Corporations have more money. Corporations have at least stunned this earth. Perpetual life, will call it perpetual life. It's not eternal life.

This world's going to end and sold these corporations someday. But you know, closest thing to eternal life that you can get as a corporation outside of a bureaucracy in this world, right as Ronald Reagan's if the bureaucracies have eternal life, but the corporations nearly do, and so they're obviously better than you and I, according to a lot of libertarians and conservatives who think that they ought

to be the ones calling the shots even though they don't like it. You know, over and over again, Reason said, I don't like it. John Stossel said, I don't like it. They're censoring me. But I just have to stand for the corporations because corporations can do no wrong, and the eyes of conservatives and libertarians leave them alone. They can do no wrong. If they do wrong, of course, people will stop buying their products and they'll go away. What hasn't worked out that way? Has it?

Have you noticed how the ESG and DEI stuff say, yeah, we did have the bud like boycott, but it didn't end Budweiser. They'll come back. They can weather this. They can raise money on Wall Street. It's not going to be fatal to them. They don't go away, even with big boycotts, and it's very rare that that happens. So reason Cato the

think tank, libertarian think tank, Heritage Foundation, biggest conservative thinking. They've always been on the side of censoring companies of companies who censor on social media

against us. They always said it was their prerogative. They had to pull back, and I thought they'd learned their lesson when we had the documents that were part of the Twitter files showing that there was the federal government was coordinating this in both a Biden administration and also during the Trump administration, telling people telling them who to censor. But now, even with that physical evidence, even with the receipts, you still have reason out there reverting back to the

old idea that corporations should be able to censor whoever they wish. They're no different on this than CNN. Isn't that amazing? Strange bedfellows for different reasons. Of course, the Democrats believe that government can never do anything wrong. Many of the conservatives and libertarians believe that corporations can never do anything wrong.

Here's the reality. There are two sides of the same coin. Now, the big corporations are no different than big government, and they're including together, and when they clue together, they do wrong things that are some of the biggest wrong things that anybody could ever do. When you got big business and big government colluding together, that is fascism. And they clue together to destroy

the Constitution all the time. And so it does turn on Second Amendment rights to keep in bear arms because it infringes on those the ATF's very existence, which I'm very surprised about. Reason Again, they take more of a pragmatic approach than a liberty approach, just as a Cato Institute does. They're not

going to call for the abolition of the irs. They want to quibble over how the deck chairs are arranged on the Titanic, and they're not going to call for the abolition of the ATF either, Which if you're going to support the Second Amendment, the ATF's got to go and the National Firearms Act and all the rest of this stuff. And again they point out it's all came

from, you know, the bump stock. Isn't it interesting that this precedent was set by Trump instead of Hillary and that this Trump precedent was predicated on one of the most suspicious shootings we've ever had, and it's the Las Vegas shooting. Yes, people died. I had step Achennik come on and say nobody died. Again another clue about how this whole thing is that up by the Intelligence committeees. When Steve Pitchennik is pushing a narrative nobody don't now people

died, that makes it more effective. The question is there are so many, many, many questions we talked about over and over again about that shooting in Vegas, but that laid the foundation for the bump stock and the bumps for you know, the bump stocks with the villains that were made out of that, And it's like, seriously, that's what you're going to Why was it focusing on that, Well, because that was something that the NRA was

not going to fight, the Conservatives would not fight. It's just this junk thing, but they foolishly did not understand the precedent involved. So you know, why do I cover this Because Biden is also openly anti Second Amendment, actually more openly, more overtly, you know, Trump pretends to support it. The reason I cover this is for two reasons. Number one, You know, we all know that Joe Biden wants to ban everything that has to do with firearms. Okay, granted, so Trump is better, right?

No, Actually, the trader in your midst is more dangerous to you than the guy who is an enemy combatant flying his flag. That's why you need to be suspicious of Trump. But then there's another reason I cover this, and that is because how do you fix this? We got Trump, we got Biden. I don't have a choice. They both want to push gun control. Right. No, you fix it at the state level, and it's been fixed at the state level. I'm glad that Michael Cargill is fighting

this all the way to the Supreme Court. But weethern have the Supreme Court supports the Second Amendment. We then have the Supreme Court supports the idea that this country was founded upon that our rights come from God. They're not granted by government, and they can't be repealed by government, and government officials have to take an oath not to attack those God given rights, regardless of whether not the Supreme Where gets that? Right here in Tennessee we have for the

pistol brace, which is also done by Trump people. Don't give him credit for that, but he did that, and he was trying to push that through. He got a lot of push back then from the NRA because they said, oh, wait a minute, you know, we don't care about bumpstocks. We care about this. The NRA doesn't care about the principle is the problem. But they look at it, well, now you're coming after

this thing, so they pushed back. He removed it in between the election in twenty twenty and the time that he left office, and then Biden put it back in. But Trump had already instituted the pistol brace ban as another executive order. And now Biden thinks, and Kamala Harris thinks, sorry, Lala lalla, Laala thinks that she can just ban anything she wants. And she said that during the campaign when she was still running for president, And

so how do you stop it? Well, in Tennessee, they said, if the if something is legal in Tennessee, the FEDS can't make it illegal. And we just made and we're not going to help them to enforce this. As a matter of fact, We're not only not going to comply, but we will block this. And then they made pistol braces legal you can do things at the state level. And this is why I cover this stuff is not just to point out to people what a trader Donald Trump is,

because he is a trader. Benedict Donald is a trader, and we'll show more about that in the program. We talk about this fake pandemic and alex Isar who was running it, and it goes all the way back to George W. Bush, who, by the way, was a trader as well with his Patriot Act and all the rest of this stuff. And what happened

in twenty twenty was the other shoot to drop from nine to eleven. It was the other shoe to drop from people like Alex'sar, who was there at the very beginning, at the very beginning and responsible for pushing out this legislation to the states. And then Trump puts him in as head of HHS,

Fauci's boss, Fauchie's boss's boss. And so Jonny Ernst is introducing a bill to protect firearm dealers from Biden's WEAPONI is ATFS, so we know that he's Biden is trying to shut down all the gun stores and he's pulling their license and shutting down these businesses if they got one minor technical thing that in the past will either have been given a warning or the most defined. Instead of giving them a fine or a warning, he pulls their license completely and shuts

their business down any excuse. So on February the fourteenth, the National Shooting Sports Foundation warned that Biden's ATF's zero tolerance policy, that's what they call it. They call it a zero thoms. We got zero things all over the place, right, We've got to have zero cars, zero missions, zero meat, zero milk, zero tolerance of all kinds of things that the liberals

hate because they are nothing other than to solitarians. And we know that the zero tolerance policy has had devastating effects on small businesses, the ability for law abiding citizens exercise or Second Amendment rights by freely approaching a firearm retailer for a purchase, I said. And so one of the things that the ATF has now done as they moved down this path that was the precedent that was set

by Trump. Of course, just to even start redefining what guns are, right, we're gonna say that a bump stock makes something a machine gun. Well, let's also redefine gun parts as actual guns and say if you got a gun part the pistol frame rule, for example, you have to get a background check, in approval and permission from the government have even a firearm part. That's where the Biden people want to go. Now, we all

understand how evil, how unconstitutional that is. But we understand how evil and unconstitutional is whereas the purpose of people like Trump is to put the opposition to sleep. It's for D chess. Don't worry about it. Trump's got it covered. So we're told by the big con media, the big conservative media, running a big con on you talking about for D Chess. The new classification was meant to force Americans to undergo a background check in order to purchase

gun parts and kits. The ATF made a similar move with the ar pistol stabilizer braces. You see how fast they're implementing this Trump precedent. And so now the Supreme Court is going to hear the challenge to the ATF bump stock ban. And notice this is a Breitbart article here. New York Times said the bump stock was Trump's bump stock ban, but Breitbart won't even say that Trump did. It buried down halfway near to the end. Actually of the article. It was the ATF who did it, the ATF who did it.

Now it's Trump who said he was going to do it, and it's Trump who keeps telling us that he is actually going to stop all gun control. That's what makes this so dangerous. During my four years, nothing happened, and there was great pressure on me having to do with guns. We did nothing. We didn't yield. And once you yield a little bit,

that's just the beginning, that's the avalanche begins. Yeah, and once you said a precedent like this, you can see the avalanche, the avalanche of gun control by executive order, gun control by the swamp, the swamp, all of these alphabet agencies, all these bureaucracies under the presidency. So if I could just sum up Chris and John, Patton, Joe, maybe you could all get together. You'll start it from that standpoint. Other people, Diane, you have some very good ideas. We all have, I think

everybody, Marko, I know, even lot fellas. If you could all get together, if we could put in one great piece of legislation, Chuck, I think that you're gonna have an amazing result in the vote. And vote so hard to get in Congress. That's what's been happening. You're gonna have an amazing result. People are gonna be shocked to see the number. It's not gonna be sixty. It's gonna be way above sixty, and it may be a number that nobody would even believe. People want to see something.

Yeah, I like your financial statements, but they want to see something good happen to, not just another piece of I mean, you didn't pass anything, let alone some good stuff. We want to pass something great. But if you four could get together and do something and maybe set the foundation. Add to the foundation were some of the great things said for certain types of weapons. I mean, some people aren't gonna like that, but you're

gonna have to look at that very seriously. We're going to ban certain times of weapons. Vote. I think it's going to be a very successful vote. And I will sign it, and I will call whoever you want me to if I like what you're doing. And I think I like what you're doing already, but you can add to it. But you have to be very very powerful on background checks. Don't be shy, and don't worry about bumpstock. We're getting rid of it. Where it'll be at I mean,

you don't have to complicate the bill by adding another two paragraphs. We're getting rid of it. I'll do that myself. I'll do that myself too. Fortunately we're able to do that. Yeah, how'd you do that through congressation? Yeah? Fortunately he's able to do that. How is he able to do that? Well? See again the reason I cover this. You know that Biden is coming for the guns. Do you know that Trump's coming for the guns in his second term as well? Do you know that? I

know that I'm warning you about that? And how do you stop it? Well? Now, what do we do one or the other? I guess I'll just have to pick a different issue to decide between Trump and Biden. No, pick a different jurisdiction to try to defend your liberty. Pick the state. I just talked about what Tennessee did about pistol braces and things. Now here's a Georgia bill that makes property owners liable for injuries if they create a gun for his own if they put up a sign SA and you can't

bring a gun in here. Remember Luby's cafeteria in taxes years ago? So woman, she was a dentist you know, walls or the sign was, you can't bring your pistol in here. I don't want to have a hassle with anybody. I've got a well, a good paying practice, and all the rest of the stuff. So she leaves her pistol in the car. We and behold, somebody drives I think it's a pickup into the side of the restaurant, jumps out to start shooting people no reason. And she's there.

She goes to get her pistol. It's like, don't have it in my purse this time, And you know, she said, come on, let's go. Her parents were their elderly parents. She runs out, thinking that they're behind her, but they don't follow her. She's racked with guilt that she didn't have a pistol to defend them. She spoke many times about that. She ran and got elected in Texas and her experience was instrumental in changing the carry laws in Texas now again in Texas an a state in Georgia.

What they're saying is, if you do the type of thing that Luby's Cafeteria did, then you're going to be responsible for all the people that get hurt. If it's a situation like that you are taking. You're putting the responsibility of protecting everybody on you, on this corporation, on this business that prohibits people from being able to carry a gun to defend themselves, and if they get hurt because of that, you are liable. And not only that, but you've got to put a sign up. If you put a sign

up to on people, they can't bring it in. You also got to put up a sign that says that we are going to be providing your security for you. See, you can do things at the state level that you can't do in Washington, especially with the president, especially with Trump. Forget about Trump, put your work, put your money in. At the state

level. At the state level HB thirteen sixty four, any lawful weapons carrier who is prohibited from caring and who is injured shall have a cause of action against the person, the business, or the other entity that owns or legally legally controls such property. The sponsor of the bill, Martin Momtahan, said,

talked about his motivation. He said, all we want to make sure is if you're in the store or anywhere and it has a no gun sign, then that store needs to understand they have absolute custodial care of the person

who has denied the ability to protect themselves by being armed. The text Claire is that any posting that bars legal gun owners from being armed for self defense must be accompanied by signage that makes it clear that the landowner understands his custodial duties and I so while on such property, you shall be under the absolute custodial care of the person, business, and other entity that owns or legally

controls such property. And that's got to be in any public notice posted on property that will include language that provides that weapons are not prohibited on such property shall also contain language such as I just read you. You see, if we really want to do something, we don't have to depend on the presidency. Your vote is one out of hundreds of millions of votes, even if the votes are legitimately tabulated. And that's a big ask, a big if,

even if legitimately tabulated. And when you look at all the opportunities nationwide to rig the election, and it's the one that is most vulnerable to fraud because it's running so many different jurisdictions. In any one of these jurisdictions can rig it. Take a look at Florida in the two thousand election, or

a handful of states in the twenty twenty election, it's worse. The presidential race is worse than any other federal office for Senate or for Congress, for the House, because those are more localized and there's fewer people voting, and there's you know, geographically isolated, and so if they're going to have a fraud in Illinois, that doesn't affect your election for senator in another state. But as you get further and further down and the geographical area gets smaller and

smaller, the opportunity to have a honest election goes up. But your influence also goes up, and so you can have an impact on that, and these people can fix things from the bottom up. Stop focusing on the federal election, especially on Trump. I'm so tired of hearing people say, yeah, but who do you want for president? I don't want a Caesar, and both of these guys think they're Caesar. Both of these parties, Republican

and Democrats, crossed the rubicon a long time ago. And the dupes that are in both of these parties, the Party Faithful Democrats, the Maga Trump people, These idiots, these useful idiots for these caesars think that that's the path to get things done. And doesn't matter whether they're conservative or liberal,

they've still bought into that line. They're idiots, idiots Texas and Florida say that the First Amendment must be sacrificed to save it. Now, this is again Reason wrong on the bump stock stuff, and Reason as they've always been wrong on social media censorship always, and they're back riding this horse again. Even after the documents have been released, they still will not acknowledge this. You know, they typically hang out on freedom issues, but boy they get

it wrong. So they're very good on civil asset for forture, for example, but boy do they get it wrong when it comes to free speech. And I don't know, is it the bias of the fact that, uh, you know, they got a magazine and they got a platform and people are going to go there and they don't want competition. Is that what it is? That's I really do think though that for Reason and for Heritage Foundation, it really does come from their foolish idea that corporations can do no wrong

and if they do wrong, the marketplace will fix it. That's not the world that we live in. They will not acknowledge that the corporations have merged with this thing that they think can do nothing right, which is the government. So yeah, the uh the States again here with this case that is before the Supreme Court. Again, it's the states who are doing the right thing, and reason criticizes them for that. The States are doing what the

Feds should be doing but will not do. And even if you know the Supreme Court gets it wrong on this, the States should ignore this because it is that kind of tyranny is unconstitutional. There isn't any branch of government, whether you're talking about the presidency or the Congress or the judiciary, there isn't any branch of government that has the authority to override the Second Amendment or to override the First Amendment. I don't really care what the Supreme Court's opinion is.

If I was in office, I would treat it, and these people ought to treat it. I've said this about Roe v. Wade. I said that was a Texas law and the response to the Texas governor should have been the same as Andrew Jackson, who said, well, the Supreme Courts issued his opinion let's see them enforce it. He did whatever he wanted to and ignored what they told him he had to do, and he was right under the Constitution. Again, that was with the Cherokee They're being relocated.

The Supreme Court changed their opinion because they saw how horrific that policy was, but they didn't have the authority. It was a bad policy. What Andrew Jackson did was bad, but it was his constitutional authority to do that, and you have to keep that structure there. The rightful remedy is if a president does something bad, you impeach them, yeah, or you don't vote for them next time, or whatever, depending on the level of how bad

this is. But that would be the rightful remedy. You don't just ignore the constitution. Otherwise you wind up where we are today in modern America, where you have a lawless dictatorship and we have caesars that are out there. Andrew Jackson's policies were wrong, but he was not acting as a sea. He was acting within his authority and divided government to do what he wanted.

And the Founders understood that. They said the least dangerous They believed the branches of government would be the judiciary because it had no means to enforce what it wanted to have happened. Congress can enforce it by cutting funds, which they never do. And of course the president has executive power to do things which to get the bureaucracy in line the swamp the bureaucracy. Of course they never

do that either. But anyway, that was constitutional, and so the response to Roby Wade should have been the Texas government governor should have said, well, I don't really care. We're going to not allow babies to be murdered here. That's what we do. That's our authority. And when you look at the First Amendment, Texas and Florida have it right. I talked about this yesterday. The Florida law only protects the free speech politicians. Unfortunately,

the Texas law is broader and protects it for everybody. Now, both of them are before the Supreme Court, and the arguments were made yesterday by the Supreme Court, and so Reason says that the Texas Solicitor General, Aaron Nielsen told the Supreme Court that a social media platform is like a telegraph. Yeah, a telegraph or a phone line or something like that. And I've used

this analogy in the past as well. Do you want to have a situation where you've got the operator listening in on your phone conversations and if they don't like what you're saying to your neighbor because they disagree with you politically, they disagree with you religiously, do you want them pulling your phone service? Because that's what this is about. That's exactly what this is about. Social media should be treated like a public utility, should be treated like the public square.

Looking at it from either of these angles, and again it is like the public square. And even if the public square is privately owned nineteen forty six Marsh versus Alabama, you can't censor it. Even if the public square is privately owned. Nobody brought that argument up, as I can see, no one brought Marsh versus Alabama up. I just to me, it's just beyond belief of the people who are Even CNN says that social media is a

digital public square. Jack Dorsey has said that we've already got a Supreme Court decision saying, I don't if it's a public square, I don't care if it's privately owned, you don't get to censor people. But it's also a public utility, and all of these things apply. You know, don't have your phone line cut off because the phone company doesn't like what you're saying about something. But Reason sided with net Choice, who said a social media platform

is more like a newspaper. No, it's not, because under section two thirty gave immunity to these companies and said because they are not publishers. A newspaper is a publisher. And a key thing about being a content provider is you don't have to necessarily even write the articles. You just decide which articles are going to be there. I mean, newspaper has grabbed stuff all the

time from associated press or you know, reiters or something like that. You don't have to be the author, but you decide what's going to be there. And we know that that is a viewpoint. Just take a look at Drudge. He's the biggest news aggregator anywhere, and he used to be conservative. He used to pick articles that were conservative. Now he picks articles that are anti conservative. So they're not The social media companies are not publishers.

They can't have their cake and eat it too. They can't have this immunity by calling themselves publishers, And at same time, I say, I want the immunity to come with not being a publisher. So reason is wrong about that as well, and so is net choice. So they said, the person who was arguing for a net choice recognize that Facebook and so forth are not like dumb pipes that simply transmit messages. Yes they are. They're like a telephone or a telegraph. That's exactly what they are. And when we

talk about social media, they're really really dumb pipes. They're incredibly stupid pipes, aren't they. And everybody's piping up in very dumb, stupid ways typically and arguing with each other. It's anyway. The Solicitor General Henry Whittaker from Florida argued that the social media law served an important First Amendment interest by ensuring the free dissemination of ideas. And remember, the Florida law only supports free

speech for politicians on social media. Florida law requires social media platforms to host speech by any candidate for office, even when it flagrantly violates their content rules. Now we already have that with the networks, don't we. Right Broadcast networks, any of them cannot refuse to air a candidate's at and we just saw this in practice, because you had a progressive leftist woman who is pro life and she is a fighter, and she's showing pictures of aborted babies.

Look at this and tell me this isn't a baby. Look at this and tell me this isn't a person, a human being. And she's showing those pictures which have been censored everywhere. They would not allow these types of things to be shown on colleges. Matt Drudge showed one to get out of his contract at Fox News, and that wasn't even a boarded baby. That was a baby, you know, reaching as part of an operation, reaching up and grabbing the doctor's finger. Right. They don't want you to see the

humanity of babies. And so she's running for office so that she can show that commercial. That's the only reason she's she's not going to get elected. She probably doesn't want to be elected, but she wants to run those ads. And so that's already recognized. Why would it be any different for the Internet. Why would the Internet be able to censor when the broadcast companies cannot.

The Texas law in some ways has broader, saying social media platforms may not sensor speech based on viewpoint, and that's precisely what it should be. You should stop viewpoint censorship. If somebody is showing something that's incredibly violent or explicitly sexual, you should be able to censor that, but not somebody's viewpoint. That's the key thing. And yet it's not just Reason that gets it wrong. A poll shows that almost a third of Americans say that the First

Amendment goes too far. Now, this is also an article from Reason magazine. It's interesting to see, you know again, even though somebody identifies themselves as a support of liberty doesn't mean that they necessarily are. Now in this particular case, they're decrying. I think the fact that this is most Americans say that one on the wrong track when it comes to free speech, that we're protecting free speech too much. Now where Reason goes wrong as they think

that corporations have free speech and human beings don't. Corporation is a creature of God, who have government granted privileges. I mean of a government godvernment. Corporations creed by government as a privilege. And yet human beings are created by God. And that's what distinguishes us from corporations. That our rights should not be in fringed. So it's a similar number of Republicans and Democrats who believe

that speech try to be infringed. See that's where we are now. We become what we fight, and I see this all the time, especially with the Trump supporters. We got to shut those people up. We've got to punish them, we got to get revenge. I'm going to do to them what they're doing to us. I'm gonna do the mail m ballots and the ballot harvesting better than the Democrats did, rather than reforming it. That's Laura Trump's idea at the RNC. They're no different from the Democrats. And I've

always said that Trump is a Democrat. I think the whole Trump family is. Frankly, I'm not looking to billionaires to save me. These people love money, the root of all evil. It's possible, it is possible, but it's harder for a rich man to get through the eye of a needle, and it is for a billionaire to be a person who is going to uphold principle and to act in an altruistic way to save you. They're going to save themselves and they're going to try to save money and make money.

The First Amendment goes too far, and the rights that are guarantees, say a majority both Republicans and Democrats. The results were disappointing but not exactly surprising. Said that fire, this is the foundation for let me see there, foundation for individual rights and expression. They focus on the First Amendment, and they especially look at colleges, where colleges now have become very illiberal. Liberal used to mean that they were about liberty. It used to mean that they

wanted to liberate the mind. That was what a liberal education was about, to free the mind. And so they wanted to have free speech and debate. Not anymore. Half the respondents said that their community definitely or probably should not permit a public speech, expressing the opinion that they found most defensive. Now, if you are some of these conservatives or libertarians, you would say you would substitute for community, you would substitute corporation, corporation, And then

that makes it okay. You know, for them, they look at the community, that's a tyranny of the majority. Well, okay, you want a tyranny of a couple of CEOs. You like that ESG, you like that DEI stuff. We wh being sixty nine percent that a local college should definitely or probably not allow a professor who holds such opinions to teach there. In other words, they should definitely not allow professors to have free speech or

probably not allow them to have free speech. Over quarter of the respondents said that someone who previously said the offensive opinion should be fired from their job. So sixty nine percent say, you don't even have you don't keep them in there, and you actively move to get them out. Now. I talk the other day about Ireland, how a listener say, it's even worse the free speech rules coming out of Canada. Trudeau has tabled a draconian censorship bill

that criminalizes dissenting voices. Says Rebel News. It remains to be seen where they're going to bring it back with amendments, but they've said some pretty amazing things. They claim that their Quote Online Harms Act does not undermine freedom of speech. It enhances free expression by empowering all people to safely participate. You see, that's how they get around this. We want to have free expression, so that means that you're going to use their pronouns or you'll be you'll

have your free expression taken away from you. It's very cynical, very Marxist.

Quite frankly on rockfin Harps says a council near me is halting five G towers after someone wrote a legal letter telling them they will be held liable for any health radiation damage caused by towers. Good. That's really good. That's really good. Send me a link to that if you can't all look for

that is excellent. And that's what you know. We had under Bill Clinton in nineteen ninety six, we had the Telecommunications Act, came a decade after Fauci got the legal immunity for the vaccine companies, Bill Clinton did it for the telecom companies. And what it said was local people cannot object for health reasons to any of the telecommunications towers that are out there. And then you

had, excuse me, you had cancer. You had cancer clusters and some areas and in some cases they put up a group of antennas and right next to a school because they had the property there. You had a big cancer cluster of students and even some teachers. And so the local community made them take that down. Even if there's a federal law and they don't have the authority for that federal law. You can again, if you got the guts,

you can fix these things at the state level. So what I was saying about gun control stuff, you know, that's what I'm saying about the First Amendment. The same thing is true of these towers. You may not be able to get a president to do the right thing, and you probably will never be able to get Congress to do the right thing or the courts, but you can get the right thing done at the local level. And you know, we've seen over and over again thanks to the Left, we've

seen marijuana laws. Marijuana the federal government has never changed it. It is still a Schedule one drug, the worst label that you can put on a drug, which says that it's got no medical use. Well, you know you've got way. More than half of the states have legalized it for medical use or even for recreational use, now defying the government because the government has no constitutional authority to do that prohibit things. So I'm glad to see that

Hearts. Thank you for letting us know we can fix these things. You're just not going to get them fixed if you focus on the top. And that's why all of the media wants you to focus your attention on Washington, and they want you to focus your attention on Trump so that you won't get anything done. And that's why I focus so much attention to exposing him as a fraud and as a traitor. And that's what he is. And We've got more to say about that, but I'm going to take a quick break

here. Before i go to break, Travis has put up a quote from Chestertown. He says, if we diminish the camel to his smallest, or if we open the eye of the needle to his largest, If, in short, we assume the words of Christ have meant the very least that they could mean, his words must at the very least mean this that rich men are not very likely to be morally trustworthy. Christianity, even when watered down, is hot enough to boil all modern society to rags. The mere minimum

of the Church would be a deadly ultimatum to the world. For the whole modern world is absolutely based on the assumption not that the rich are necessary, which is tenable, but that the rich are trustworthy, which for a Christian is not tenable. You will hear, everlastingly, in all discussions about newspapers, companies, aristocracies or party politics. This argument that the rich man cannot be bribed. Oh we hear that in MAGA all the time, don't we.

Whereas all these people like GK. Chesterton and CS List And by the way, I had somebody write me because I did a CS. Lewis quote. I don't endorse everything that anybody says. Okay, and you know, your mileage may vary. I disagree with G. K. Chesterton, I disagree with C. S. Lewis on some things. I disagree with John Lewis, who is a very good apologist in terms of speaking to atheists. But John Lewis disagrees with the Bible about creation and he's written books about it.

And so I don't endorse everything that John Lewis has to say. But he is a brilliant apologist. And in the same way C. S. Lewis and GK. Chesterton have some brilliant observations. They can be wrong, but in this particular case, he's not. He is spot on. So that's the whole idea that we need Trump, because again he's not a politician. You know, he came out of nowhere. We didn't know what he was about in twenty sixteen. He had a real dodgy background of character.

But hey, he doesn't. He can't be bought because he's already got all the money. He guess what, you know, the rich typically love money, and that's why Jesus said what he did. A lot of people I've heard of the explanation when I was growing up. Well, you know, there was this place called the eye of the camel, and you could actually get through it, but you know, you had to get off your camel and you had to get him to go through on his knees. And there's

no evidence of anything like that. Yeah, take it at what he says that it would take a miracle to get a camel through the eye of a needle. But God can do miracles. He could even save Trump. Who knows what will happen. You can pray for that. The fact is, of course that the rich man is bribed. He has been bribed already. That is why he is a rich man. And this is good Dravis.

I like this. The whole case for Christianity is that a man who is dependent upon the luxuries of his life is a corrupt man, spiritually corrupt, politically corrupt, financially corrupt. He lives in this gilded place. Wherever he goes, whether it's Trump Towers or whether there's mar A Lago, everything is covered with gold. Trump has already been bribed by Satan himself. There is one thing that Christ and all Christian saints have said, with sort of savage

monotony. They have said simply that to be rich is to be in peculiar danger of moral wreck. JK. Chestertown, Well, he was spot on about that. Thank you for the quote, Travis. We're gonna take a quick break. We'll be right back, Elvis, the Beatles and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com. So, unlike most revolutions, whether people rise against the real economic oppression, in our case, here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an

abstract principle. It is, however, not nearly so abstract as a young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here is one of monopoly. Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country. Tomorrow it will be something else. Liberty. It's your move. You're listening to the David Night Show, all right, And I was gonna show you a new uh, a new shirt that we have, but uh, we are going to

wait till reduce that until tomorrow. I did want to think people. Several people have been donating to us, and we had of course Junk Silver and many other people. I matched the donations that people did, and that has really helped a great deal. At the beginning of the week, we were just over fifty percent, and we moved the gauge up to three quarters a couple of days ago, and it's gone off a little bit. It was under three quarters, but it was closer to three quarters than it was like

a low seventies seventy two, seventy three percent. Now we're up to like seventy eight percent. We haven't moved it off of the three quarters yet, but we got one extra day here. We really would appreciate anything that you could contribute. If you haven't contributed already, we understand a lot of people have and we really do appreciate that. But if you would like to sign up, for example, a subscribe Star subscribe Star donations. I haven't talked

about them. I haven't really interacted with people there enough, and I see that that has gone out. We had a lot of people this month, more so than usual, have moved to zel and that's good for us because there's no fees there if your bank supports that. The thing about subscribe Star is that it is if you set it up, you know, for like five dollars a month or something like that, you don't have to think about it. And that really has been in the past a base of support for

us, but that's eroded quite a bit. The other thing that eroded quite a bit are ads for whatever reason, and so the ad revenue is down as well. But we really do appreciate your support. And again cash app is also there, and so you can find those links as well as links to the program at the Davidnightshow dot com. Let's talk about alex Azar and this pandemic thing, so called pandemic, and again, who is alex Asar. Alex Azar was the head of Eli Lilly and I've talked about it,

but not all the way back to the very beginning of this. I just went back and did a deep dive into his history, deeper than i'd done before. Typically, what I do is I tell people, and I've said this many many times. You've heard this, If you listen to the program that Trump had presented himself as a vaccine skeptic. Well, I think maybe you know vaccines are maybe correlated to the rise of autism. Does anybody have any other ideas about this? Should we ask why there's an increase in autism?

If it's not vaccines, then what is it? Oh, you don't care that it's exploded to you. We shouldn't look. And so he was skeptical about that. He brought in RFK Junior to Trump Tower during the transition period between the election of the time they got sworn in on January the twenty first, and then right away big pharmaceutical companies made a big donation to Trump and they brought in Then he never talked to our K Junior again, but

they brought in the CEO of Eli Lily. Eli Lilly, as I said in the past, has been one of the most politically connected companies during the Bush administration. You had was called the Lily Writer. When they were putting together the prep Act, which is the legal immunity from being sued that we now have all these things that were added in in the aftermath of nine to eleven and the anthrax attack in two thousand and one. But he's got a

much more interesting background. And when you look at where Alex's are came from, he began his political career with a Bush administration. He began he was he joined the Bush administration in August of two thousand and one. Isn't it interesting how these people, I mean these people got in just a month or a couple of weeks. You know, new FBI director all of a. Sudd just before nine to eleven. Well, alex Azar was one of those

people. He was confirmed as the General Council for the Department of Health and Human Services HHS one month before nine to eleven, which is one month after Dark Winter simulation, and then one week after nine to eleven we had the Anthracts attack. And then two months later we had model state legislation that went out to all the different states and said, here, pass these laws at the state level to allow you to do these things at the state level.

We'll send you the money later, okay, which is what they did in twenty twenty. That's what's what Trump's executive order did. It released the money to the governors if they do what they had already put on the books. Because they were offered that model legislation. Then it all worked out, so

he gets in one month before nine to eleven. A week after nine eleven, you have the anthrax attacks, and he played a very important role in handling the threat attacks, which presumably contributed to his eventual confirmation as Deputy Secretary of HHS under George W. Bush. You see, this is why I say I always said that this twenty twenty so called pandemic was the other shoe to drop from nine to eleven, and this guy was there wearing the shoes

at the time. After he left his position at the Department of Health and Human Services, he became a lobbyist for Eli Lilly. In fact, he was their top lobbyist, very good at it. But after Obama got in in two thousand and eight, Eli Lilly decided that they needed to have a Democrat leaning lobbyist, so he left that position and then it wasn't long before

he became CEO president of Eli Lilly. And as he was president, they got lot of criticism because the prices for their drugs went up tremendously, you know, kind of like Ramaswami, kind of like Martin Screlly, you know, price gouging that type of thing. As a matter of fact, their top selling insulin drug tripled in price under alex Azar Trump's HHS secretary eventual HHS

secretary. It resulted in a class action lawsuit against it as well as two other companies, and Eli Lilly was actually fined in Mexico because they don't own the Mexican government like they owned the American government. And then he claimed a year before all this stuff happened, almost in April of twenty nineteen, alex Azar claimed that pandemic flew was one of the things that concerned him a great

deal. He said this publicly at a summit on bio defense. Now, it was in April April May of that clip that I have of Trump that I play all the time, the guy to get it. It's really going around. I don't really care what their religious issues are, their medical issues. I got to get this shot. It's going around that type of thing.

That's exactly the same timeframe. And so while he is saying that his HHS secretary goes to a semit on bio defense in April of twenty nineteen, and it was alex Czar who in January the end of January twenty twenty said, you know what. Nine months later, he was the one who declared

the pandemic. Trump declared the emergency and released the money. But it was alex Czar who declared the pandemic in the end of January, and so he was already telegraphing in April that is going to be a pandemic flu, just like with Auchi at the Milkin Institute in October. How do you get everybody to take an untested vaccine? Well, you do it from the inside.

You'd do it with chaos, and you do it iteratively, right, these people, besides all the practicing of the war games, anything an event to one was the last one, but that all goes back to Dark Winter, and it was an annual event. They were telegraphing it all over the place what they were going to do. And again alex Is are enters the political field right there with nine to eleven and the anthract attack at the very beginning.

And that's what he built his political career on. Twenty years of this building to this climax of twenty twenty, and it was Trump who made it possible for him to realize his dream. Now the only question is is Trump a trader or an absolute pawn idiot dummy take your pick, I vote for a trader. So this has come up, they said because Trump's claim that

no one foresaw the potential. This is an article, by the way, that was written by Money Money magazine back at the beginning of the pandemic, and they said this has come up because of Trump's claim that no one foresaw the potential of a pandemic. Flew as a way of excusing his presidential administration's failures at bringing COVID nineteen under control. This is written by Money. They want to sell you the real pandemic and then blame Trump for not getting it

under control. He says nobody saw this coming, while they did see it coming, and they talked about it anyway. Under his leadership, the United States refused to use tests set out by the World Health Organization, hindering detection efforts during the earlier phases of the spread of the novel coronavirus. They had to get that medical death protocol hospital death protocol in place. That was really more important, and you know, just have people as by August of twenty

twenty, you had the American Medical American Hospital Association. Ah, it was an AHA moment when they said, wait a minute, you told us the beginning of this, you didn't have the test, and you told us that they didn't work anyway, and to just do a clinical diagnos to just pointed them and say they got COVID and we'll send you the money. Right, we'll send you nineteen thousand dollars. You put them on a ventilator, we'll

give you another thirty four thousand dollars. And these things only cost fifty You're already three thousand dollars in the black. And you get to charge them for everything that you do. And we will give you a twenty percent bonus for anything that you do, even if it's not related to COVID, if you've identified the patient as COVID. BINGO got the numbers way up there, right there. That's coming from Alex's aar coming from the Trump administration. Trump is

responsible for this. Everybody holds Biden responsible and should hold him responsible for everything that happens within these bureaucracies during his administration. He's rightfully held responsible, but they will not hold Trump responsible. It wasn't Trump, it was Fauci on

the podium anyway, then they talk about the cruise ship passengers. Likewise, cruise ship passengers were quarantined on the ships rather than disembarked before being quarantined on land, which was problematic because of the cramped condition of the ships made it much easier for the novel coronavirus to spread from person to person. Again,

you want to go back to what was that. That was a diamond princess off of Fukushima, and they had out of three thousand, seven hundred and eleven people, even though they had these conditions where they didn't control anything, and they had a guy who had been that's what he did. He was a doctor who went into areas where there was a massive amount of disease. He said, even with his protective equipment, he was so scared. So I've never been that afraid. Even when I went in for a bowl,

I was like seriously, And yet he didn't die. And they had seven hundred and twelve people who tested positive, but only one hundred and thirty eight of them were actually sick. And so you know, five times a number of people tested positive with these ridiculous PCR tests, but then we're actually sick.

One hundred and thirty eight people got sick. But you know, back in twenty and sixteen, four years earlier, they had not one hundred and thirty eight six sick people, but they had one hundred and fifty eight sick people from gastro enterritis. And so this is the type of thing that can happen on cruise ships. Now they did have fourteen people who died. I don't know if they died from a flu or from covid, or if they died from the treatment that they were given, or if they died from neglect.

Do you know, No, you don't know. Anybody tells you would be lying because the government has lied about this. Did they die from some pandemic? Did they die from some virus? Did they die, however, maybe from something else like grim dezevir or some other poisonous treatment like medazelon. You know that they're doing in the UK. And now Andrew Bridgen, the only honest man in the UK government, the only one who has stood against all this stuff. He is now suing Matt Hancock, who is mocking people

over his lockdown orders. Let's see what we can do to him next, that type of thing, and over his orders to use medazolam. And when he went public with what Matt Hancock was doing, Matt Hancock came after us, so he's taking him to court for defamation. Good for Andrew Bridgin, but here in the United States, everybody's just forgetting about it. We also had the Navy ship where you had remember the guy took the captain took it to port. He says, we got somebody tested positive or whatever. Nobody

died. Nobody died at all, because they're healthier than people on a cruise ship. I don't know what they did for the people who got sick on the cruise ship. Did they give them treatment, did they deny them treatment, Did the treatment kill or did the denial of treatment kill them. We don't know and we can never know. So while all this is happening now, Canada had put in a vaccine passport system. They call it Arrive can

for people arriving into Canada. Isn't it interesting that we don't worry about any of that? And Biden, who was so obsessed about this, doesn't worry about anybody walking across the border. It were so past that right now, different mcguffin, we got to work on the climate mcguffin, and we don't want to get people afraid of diseases and things at the border, So there's no need to show that you're healthy, or that you've got the approved shots

or anything like that. Just come on in. Of course, the rest of us can't travel if we haven't had all their required shots and all the rest of this stuff arrived. Can had its own scandals associated with it. They roll this thing out in April of twenty twenty, right as they're doing the lockdown. It's a tool to assist border guards in Canada, and I would say as a test to lock us in. They only care about citizens.

They don't really care about illegal immigrants. The app became mandatory for all air travelers seven months later, and was expanded to include those who were cruising, sorry, not cruising, but crossing the border. A glitch and correctly notified thousands of fully vaccinated travelers put them in quarantine a form of unlawful detention. Well, it's not just unlawful detention. If you put somebody in because

they're not vaccinated when they really are vaccinated, it's unlawful attention. If you lock up people are not even sick, you know, I've got problems with the quarantine laws. But you know, if somebody's not even sick, how do you justified attention? There's not anyway. The arrivecan app was originally budgeted to be eighty thousand dollars, but it's costs ballooned to over sixty not thousand million, three orders of magnitude, a thousand times more money than they had

planned on spending on this thing. And so now people are saying, is there some corruption going on? Who you better believe it is. The public backlash against the invasive and dictatorial app resulted in a major investigation into it. But now the focal point of the investigation is the destruction of documents associated with the creation of arrived CAM and the principal contractor, GC strategies. Yeah, they got tens of millions of dollars instead of tens of thousands of dollars.

Canada's chief technology officer has been caught modifying data files and a manner that resulted in the disappearance of emails and documents potentially tied to GC strategies. Again, when we look at Texas, the massive amounts of money that Trump was unleashed without executive order. Greg Abbott got three hundred million dollars and we were talking about only sixty minut We five times the amount these people ripped them off for

for this thing. You mean it he I don't know how many billions or tens of billions Texas got in terms of Trump cash, but Habit right away gave three hundred million dollars to this corporation that there was assistant journalists who went by and there was nobody there's it's this empty office. They did an investigation. It was like, who are these people? The guy's LinkedIn thing.

He had no CV, no curriculum, vital curriculum or anything, and very very dodgy, very very dodgy, and it was all to track and trace people. But it may have been just a big financial scam of some sort. And all the press got on it for just a moment for a day or two, and then suddenly shut up about it and never said anything else. Press, both Republican and Democrats were complaining about asking quite who is this

and they never got any answers. But they stopped talking because evidently the word came down from above the House of Commons in Canada, their decision to potentially arrest non compliant contractors over This is a watershed moment in Canadian legislative history. This is so bad, they're saying, well, we may arrest some of

these contractors, especially if they don't want to talk. The Auditor General, Karen Hogan did not shy away from waiving ethical concerns regarding government staff who accepted gifts from vendors without making necessary disclosures. In her words, the fact that there was an emergency did not justify the despising of conventional public service guidelines. We still got a constitution, got loss. She lamented the inadequacy of the

levels of public service. She declared her expectations for improved performance. Well, again, it's not just the Canadians. This is happening everywhere. Back in September of twenty twenty. If you remember this, and we should remember Trump's first administration, don't you think if we're going to if we're going to vote for him a second time, should we pay a little bit of attention to what he actually did, not what he's saying now, but what he actually

did. It might be a better clue to what he's going to do coming up than what he actually says, now, the biometric entry exit visa tracking system, which we need desperately, do we in my administration, we will ensure that this system is in place, and I will tell you it will be on land, it will be on sea, it will be in air. We will have a proper tracking system. Yeah, everywhere. But we don't care about any of that now, do we not at all? And

when you look at biometric surveillance, it is everywhere now. I reported last week the fact that you have European I think European Football League soccer. They're putting it in stadiums and things like that. Madison Square Gardens has it biometric surveillance and a database to go along with it. Of course that does the matches, of course, and we know this because there was a law firm that was suing them. They got angry about that. They put pictures of

they put biometric information. Again, she'd never been this lawyer who worked for this firm, had never been to Madison Square Gardens to get identified that way. But because they didn't like this lawsuit. She was not involved in the lawsuit, but they put everybody that worked for the firm in their database. She goes on a field trip with her kid and she gets hustled out of there by bouncers, embarrassed, angry. She soothes them over this, and

so now the NFL is going to be doing this as well. Just a couple of days ago, I pointed out the grocery store chains are starting to put in biometric stuff. So you're not going to go to a sporting event, not going to go get your food, not going to do all these different things. Because of this biometric identification, we are turning into China Shine Shina. Oh, we don't like Shina, but they're the beta test for everything that Trump and the rest of these people are going to do to us.

He was pushing this in September twenty twenty as he's running for election. Now he's not talking about this now he won, but that the crisis of the border that Biden has created has got Republicans begging, begging for this kind of stuff, just like a lot of them over this false flag of nine to eleven started begging for the Patriot Act. Aspects of this, Oh put in a tsa great, that's a great idea. We got to be protected

from people hijacking planes. There was never a threat airports and airplanes. And we know that because that's the TSA's own own assessment. And we also know that because there hasn't been another one, and because they don't do their job. They're absolute failures at their job. And so if there was a threat, we would have had multiple attacks like that. No, we don't even

need to have the document confessing that. But the TSA knows it. I know it, You know it. But you still got people who think it's necessary. So biometric ID verification is set to be used at all NFL stadiums beginning in this year, in twenty twenty four, all of them. So you know, I don't have to go to an NFL stadium. I've never been to an NFL game, but I do need to go to grocery stores from time to time if I don't have some other way to get food.

And they're going to use this type of thing. It's just like they're going to use the CBDC to shut people down, shut people out. So you can thank Trump and Biden for this, the GUP and the Democrats for this. They're all working for the same agenda. It doesn't matter these people. You're going to stop this. You've got to stop it at the state level, and of course in Florida they want to make everify mandatory. That'll keep the illegal aliens from stealing our jobs. Yep, please put us in an

open air prison. The Identity and the Access Management system. I guess what they call it. I am, I am the Great I Am. It's kind of got an Antichrist ring to it, doesn't it. This system is like a mark of the Beast typees. The IM system. The IM system and the company that provides it is called Wicket, not wicked with a D, but wicket with a T. I guess their idea is that you're like a croquet or something. You've got to go through this little entry gate.

Yeah, the straight and narrow way, and they're going to make it very narrow for you. At the same time, you have zero Hedge talking about how a lot of companies that made fantastic profits off of the pandemic are now just barely hanging in there, or some of them have now gone below where they were, and the headline was We're going to need another pandemic for these companies to make money. Oh well, it may be right around the corner.

Statistics says Zoom scroll down and show the graph there. Yeah, the pandemic winners and losers. Zoom isn't the only pandemic winner struggling to maintain this momentum in the post pandemic world. Other companies that soared under special circumstances have also come crashing down. And so you can look at this and you can see they've got a dotted line down there at the bottom, and that green line is, you know, where their profits went in March of twenty twenty.

Is the horizontal line of where they were before the before Trump declared the pandemic two days later, and the green line shows all that green money they made their peak pandemic value. And then the red line is where they are today. And you can see that Moderna is still well above where they were.

As a matter of fact, they're doing so well that if you had invested one thousand dollars in Moderna on March eleventh, two days before Trump declared the pandemic and release the money, you would have four thousand dollars today, so quadrupled in value. Pull back up, let's take a look at more of this. Etsy is just slightly over where it was at that point. In time. But then you have other companies like Docu sign and Zoom and

Peloton that are below where they were just before the pandemic. So we're going to have to have another pandemic to get them profitable. And so I wanted to go back to this to talk about the of the pandemic. I began by talking about Alex's ar. How this guy cut his career, you know, at the fast track path. He gets hired, he's involved in the

anthrax attack and all, and he gets rewarded to become deputy HHS. Then he becomes a top lobbyist, then he becomes president of Eli Lilly, and then Trump puts him back in at HHS and he finishes the job of the pandemic stuff well. Healthfreedom Defense dot Org talks about Lablink an elaborate misdirection, and I agree with him. I think this whole thing about the lab link is a fraud, and I've said it publicly. I'm on record saying that

from the very beginning. As a matter of fact, it was when this stuff was being pushed and they were pushing the fear in the panic at info Wars. I didn't make any secret of my contempt for this idea that there was some kind of a pandemic, some kind of a geo engineered bioweapon. People wanted to come on. I've had you know people. I won't mention his name, but you know, he's a very well known and I enjoyed what he had to say about defense and other things like that. He's he

knows what he's doing. He's a former Navy seal. But he came on. He was he doesn't know anything about what he's sawing. He just regurgitating panic stuff. Oh this this is engineered. It's got a little hook and it hooks onto you. You didn't see any of this stuff. You've seen some computer animation and you've heard some narratives coming out of mainstream media. You don't know any of this stuff. And you know, just like Steve Pachennick,

I said, don't put him back on again. If he's going to push stuff like that that, you know, I don't think that he was rigging it in the same way that Steve Pachennick does. But if he's going to regurgitate stuff like that that he doesn't know anything about, I'm just not going to go there. But everybody was doing that at Info wars. That's one of the reasons why Alex but on with Francis Boyle, who wanted to

push this stuff. And with all due respect, Francis, you have no idea what you're talking about with this stuff, and you have no evidence for this stuff, and anybody that looks at this stuff logically, and again I say with all due respect, because every time I would say something, he would come back, well, you know, as I'm from Harvard, and with all due respect, I must say that blah blah blah, Well he didn't know what he's talking about. And I know exactly what Alex is doing

with this stuff. He knows exactly what he's doing. And so this is what Health Freedom Defense says. The ongoing investigations into the elusive COVID pandemic murder mystery, and that's what it is, is an Agatha Christie murder mystery. And guess what, when the investigations are being done by the people who committed the murders, We're not going to find the murderers, are we It's cluttered

with all manner of obfuscation and misdirection. In chief among these shaky postulations are the various iterations of the virus lab Liak theory, which has more lives than a feral cat and possesses a capacity for reappearing as often as the shambling zombies

who lurk in the woods at the edge of town. Once the curtain is pulled back on the unsubstantiated lab Lie hypothesis, the socially engineered sorcery good word, good word pharmakia, right, the Greek word pharmacia translated as sorcery always a part of these religious rituals and anything. But it is sorcery and its deception as well. The sorcery of the pandemic is revealed as the base scheme

that it is. The lab Liak claim posits that TSARS Cove two is an engineered quasi biological deadly gain of function phenomenon rather than a computer generated construct compleet with the computer andom. Yeah, all this stuff, you saw, this virus and anything. They don't have any pictures of that. You can't see a virus. You know, this is a It is a construct. It is a theoretical construct, just like an atom. What is an atom? Is an atom? Like the neil Boores model where you got nucleus and you've

got these orbiting electrons all this kind of stuff. Or is it like the quantum physics and other things like that, What is it really, Well,

they don't know. They've got different models that they try to use to explain the way things work, but again, it isn't something that they've actually isolated or they got a picture of. So by implying to the virus as a man made microbial murderer, promulgators of the lab leak story avoid facing the fact that the last three and a half years were deliberate, highly organized culling of

the global population. The guys of protecting quote public health unquote. Yeah, this was planned, acted for twenty years, and Alex Azar was there at the very beginning, and to he was the kind of the anchor guy in

this tag team match. Many people who are in the know, who are skeptical medical industries, pharmacological fantasies, are still trapped on this lab leak circuit, and many of them who know better are pushing it because oh look, I told you this from the very beginning, and they're pushing back on it, you know, I mean that's you think about how effective that strategy is. You got Alex Jones out of their sand. Yeah, it's going to

kill everybody. It's perfected in the labs and leaked out. And then you got Faucio, Oh no, no, no, don't panic everybody. That's not what it is. And if people say, he's not telling us the truth because he's involved in creating it and all the rest of this stuff. And now even Fauci, even though and he knows he's not going to be

arrested or anything. Yeah, he would have liability if that were true, but he's putting it out there because it provides an alibi for what he knowingly did and what really happened, which was the murder of people with his vaccine and with rim dezevir and these other things, the hospital death protocol that the Trump administration bribed hospitals to do. That's why they come back to this lab leak thing. And then you got the big con press like info Wars telling

you, I'll see, we were right all along. Now even Fauci is admitting that we were right. And what are they doing. They're distracting everybody from the real murder plot. Amidst the hyper focus on gain of function research on foreign cleavage sites. We're not talking about milannia here, restriction enzymes, and the rest of the sci fi vernacula that should shroud the lab leak capothesis and scientific sounding mumbo jumbo. There lies an elementary question does this theory hold

even an ounce of water. One conspicuous curiosity that calls into question the threat of a lab leak bio weapon is the fact that COVID deak quote unquote follow the age risk stratify stratification and also follow a seasonal curve of flu and pneumonia. I said this one the very beginning. I says, this isn't a

curious that and we had two weeks worth of data. I had John Rappaport, and we're talking about the fact two weeks of data out of Italy that locked down early, and they only had a handful of people who had died. They were all over the age of life expectancy, and they all had on average more than two and a half co morbidities. So it's like,

why is this unusual? This is something that would normally be expected. Yes, it's tragic for those people who died, but it's not a large number of people, and it's people that typically die because of age and because of multiple diseases that are happening to them. We had two weeks worth of that information, but Trump locked us down anyway, and it wasn't even even if it had been a unique disease, it still was not even an epidemic level.

And certainly nothing was happening here. But of course alex'zar had locked things down, had declared it the end of January. So and I said, from the very beginning, I said, look at this. This is like an actuarial table. I said, if this was some kind of thing, and that's why they talk about it, how did this all of a sudden spread everywhere. It's not like you can trace it from this and that and it gradually moves out right, It's some kind of a contagious disease.

Now, all of a sudden, it springs up everywhere, and the people who are dying look like the people have always died. And there's a seasonal flu, and it looks like that, it looks like the actuarial tables. Equally inexplicable is the fact that in twenty twenty, reported cases of flu suddenly vanished. We have no flu because they're relabeling it. So you got eighty plus yure olds who had multiple comorbidities. You had other chronically ill people already

in or sent to hospitals and nursing homes. In these institutions, COVID patients were forcibly treated with toxic medications. They were placed on sedatives, on ventilators that blew up or collapsed their lungs. They were abandoned in rooms to die a painful, lonely, despairing death. Family members prevented from being at their side, to comfort them, to question the macabre protocols being mercilessly inflicted, and to get them out of these death row facilities. This was all one

hundred percent Trump administration, folks. He bragged about what he was doing. Yeah, I made no secret of my contempt for these lies. Countless incongruities point to the lab leak theory, and possibly the virus itself being a myth. So some questions what dark magic was involved that trained this microbe to be released only upon administrative orders and to pink to peak in synchronicity only in select

location. Are we to believe that a suddenly super spreading deadlier than flu gain a function virus waited for the government to create, to create excess deaths. Why did this deadly virus cause no mass death and wo Han where lab Leak is said to have originate it, The ostensible virus did not migrate from northern Italy to central or southern Italy, nor did it impact any other parts of Europe. Instead, it and probably hoped skipped and jumped his way straight to

the public hospital in Elmhurst in New York. And as I said, all these at the time, they were talking at the very same hospitals that they said were overcrowded and panic situation. I pulled up articles and it was two or three years earlier they had said the same thing, and they were staying at the time because they wanted more money. I said, even that is not any different. We had Franklin Graham going and it was at the Central Park to help him, and all these people were scared to death, thought

they were all going to die. They still wanted him to leave because you know, he was a Christian and he wasn't on board with homosexual marriage or whatever. Get out of here, you know, and I'd rather die than have you here. Well, they did pull out because nobody was using their facility. Why didn't Franklin Graham tell people that, you know, Trump pulled out the hospital ship that he sent to New York City, he pulled away the hospital ship that was sent to LA because they were not being used.

There's a twenty five hundred bed army field hospital that was set up there in Central Park. It wasn't being used either, and they quietly, in the middle of the night took that thing away after they'd shown. Everybody look at this and it was just the sea of beds, empty beds, waiting for people who were going to die. We had reports about how they were burying people in Central Park, and then three or four days later, very very

quiet, quiet retractions. Well, no, that wasn't actually actually the case, over and over again, but it was. You know, by that point it was already and everybody's imagination they're burying people in Central Park. They're dying, so they don't have enough places to store the dead bodies. All of this was a lie, a lie. Yet it was being pushed by the big con media as well as by the establishment media, both of them a common cause to scare you, and both of them using it as a

political cudgel. The mainstream press was using it against Trump, The big con press was using it against Fauci and the government in general. How is it possible this virus was so demographically smart? Because again I went back, I talked about the I said, look at this nineteen eighteen, a lot of people died, whatever was happening. Then it was equally distributed across all age groups, unlike the data coming out of the CDC, which looked exactly like

the typical actuarial table at the time. So all of this false. But they said, we got to believe that this whole thing was geographically savvy. How did you have like New York Right, it's all there in Manhattan. It doesn't even cross the river get to the other side. COVID affected counties in the US are right next to unaffected areas, including the New York City

metro area, where the virus seemed unable to cross the river. Was this gain of function hobgoblin designed to recognize county, state, and national boundaries and to stick to urban areas while leaving suburban and rural communities largely alone. The lab leak story surfaced early on. It was quickly adopted and became an accepted narrative. Amongst skeptics. You see, that was the role that was being

played by the big con media, by info wars and others. Some establishment COVID skeptics have built their reputations, in some case their entire cottage industry around the lab leak mythology. I told you this in the very beginning, they'll say, right, and so to justify another round of lockdowns, to codify more draconian measures such as mandated vaccination in the future, all they will be needed is to reignite the fear of a bioweapon. You see how dangerous this

is. Do you think that Trump would do that in a second term since he did it in the first term, since he's still bragging about doing it in the first term, Do you think he's likely to do I do. I do. That's why I say I don't support either one. Biden would do it as well. You better get focused on the state level, because these clowns at the federal level, whether it's Trump or whether it's Biden,

they're going to try to pull this game on you again. The related result of focusing on the lably conjecture is that it shows up the deadly novel virus suddenly appeared narrative, which provides a rationale for the biosecurity complex to siphon trillions of dollars into their industry. They can distract attention from how the perception of a pandemic mass panic was conjured with staged Hollywood productions, the dancing nurses, the rest of the stuff, with the very you know, you've got drone

footage, You've got big boom cameras, everything is coordinated. Do you think those are really nurses that we're even dancing? There? Doomsday models, the meaningless PCR tests of fraudulently manufactured cases that spuriously attributed death from other causes to COVID. But perhaps the biggest problem with accepting and promoting all this big lie that there was ever a pandemic is a theory hides crimes that were committed by

the hospitals and nursing homes and politicians. Not only does a pandemic narrative serve to conceal the likelihood that this was a mass murder spree set off by policies constructed orchestrated mandated by identifiable individuals, it also serves as a smoke screen to the entire COVID operation. This is one of the reasons why I don't support R. F. K Junior. He's written a book now to push this narrative of a bioweapon, and I don't support him either. I don't trust

him either. It's like I don't trust Trump or Biden. This entire fishtail dropped on the COVID discourse to keep the public obsessing over the origins of the disease rather than focusing on the policy induced slaughter slaughter of the last three and a half years. And this is whife, how she's now nodding to it. He knows that he's got plausible deniability about all. Well, it was

the Chinese, it was this. But if he takes that away now it comes back to his policies and Trump's policies, the vaccine, the lockdowns,

the mass, the this, the that. Without the existence of the bioweapon, everything else in the official narrative swirls down the toilet, including the contrived case definitions, the dodgy non diagnostic PCR tests, the fake excuses given for Lockdown's masks and social distancing, and the debate between whether the novel virus originated with a love match between a bat and a panglin or from a gain of function experiment at the Wu Hen lab. The establishment insistence on pushing this serves

to cover up the actual crimes that were committed. And that's why I say, you're either an idiot or you're part of the establishment if you're pushing this lab link theory. So I don't trust RFK juniors. Why I know not to trust Alex I know what he knew privately, I know why he was doing this. So where do we go from here? Well, you know, if we looked at all of this, we would If you remove this, then it shines a spotlight on these people. Oh yeah, Trump didn't

do it. It was done to him by the Chinese. It was the Wu flu. That's what Breitbart likes to call it in the Trump media, the Big Khan media. Misdirection is a classic strategy used to divert attention from one subject and direct it to another. Getting people to ask all the wrong questions ensures that they will not be looking for answers to the right questions. That's the key, that is what's right there. Well, it is time for us to bring on Tony a little bit past time, and he's on.

I want to thank Greg. Thank you very much, Greg Talent. I appreciate that tip, and we would really appreciate any help that we've got. We're still under budget for the month and we got a few more hours left, but thank you very much. Greg. I really do appreciate the tip and keep saying the same people who support the program, and I really do appreciate that. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back with Tony Ardeman of Wise Wolf Gold. We'll be right back. The

common Man. They created common Core, dumbed down our children. They created common past, track and control us their Commons project to make sure the commoner own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.

They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidknightshow dot com, welcome back and joining us now as Tony Ardaman of wise Wolf Gold. Tony has kindly set up

Davidknight dot gold which will take you to wise Wolf. Let them know that you're coming through this program, and Tony, thank you for joining us. We've got a lot of crazy stuff happening now financially all of different areas. We're living an interesting financial times, aren't we, and many other we certainly are. Thank you for having me back. David. While you were talking about gain of function, I'm starting to think I can't prove it, but

was Janet yelling a lab leak. I'm not sure what she made in a lab, but she seems engineered to crash our economy with some sort of economic gain of function. I was looking at what she does, like those mushrooms that she got in China. She just stop bowing to she. You know, when she's put out a statement, I think it's just absolutely unhinged. You said that the world's most advanced economies have a moral obligation to unfreeze Russian

assets to aid Ukraine. And this is on the heels of massive de dollarization because of the sanctions that we have all over the world of forty different sanctions thirty six different countries, the weaponization of the dollar. It's having blowback consequences on our own economic strength, the strength of the dollar, the future of the US economy. But they're doubling, tripling, quadrupling down. David, it's it really is a harbinger. I think I love that you've used that

word a few times the last week. It is a harbinger of things to come as we see less and less usage of the dollar, and this is because countries are dumping it. I read another statement from a representative of South Africa. You know the s in bricks, or at least one of the ESSs, and now they have Saudi Arabia. But he said, I they've got a lot of a lot of We've got a lot of SA's in our government as well, don't we. Twenty five other countries are on the waiting

list for bricks. Wow, twenty five and bricks alone is forty percent of the world's population. What do you happen to me to get into bricks? So they have to get some biometric data the leaders. That's a good question. You know, it's like one's trading one old system for something else. It's you know, a lot of countries. I think it's like, well, this is the devil I know, instead of the devil. I don't know. But the US is making it really difficult not to look for other

alternatives, especially people like Jenny Yell and they are just totally clueless. Well, you and I live in America and we're looking for other alternatives to the dollar. That's truebody's got to be looking for alternative to the dollar. So yeah, and there are some interesting things that have been happening. Bitcoin exploding. The thing I thought was amazing answer this one article. Coinbase couldn't handle

it because there was so much volatility in the price. It jumped up and then and then it you know, went up to like sixty k and then it dropped down like five thousand, and the people looked at their balances and it was it said zero, and so then coin basis and the thing out is like, don't worry, everything's just fine here, and it's like, really, is just why you just told me that man balance is zero? And then it jumped back up to like sixty four. I mean, it's

all over the place. What do you think is going on with that? You were just at a bitcoin conference. I mean, is it this ETF stuff and the institutions that are roiling the market. What's going on? It's the ETFs, the institutional money jumping into the market, and what it's a reflection of supply and demand. This is basic economics. There's not a lot

of bitcoin supply. Remember there's only twenty one million that will ever exist, and a big chunk of that will is missing and they'll never be recovered. You know, landfall on somebody's heart, and landfills and wallets aire never be re animated. So you're seeing I think this is a real economic lesson of supply and demand. And there's also the fact that the u US dollar,

it's bitcoin, is going the opposite direction. And you know, the Greek mythology always talked about when Ebrius presents itself, when you become eubristic or so arrogant that there's a summon's nemesis. This is the old the Greek mythology. Well that's kind of what this is. Is. Bitcoin, in a lot

of ways is a modern nemesis to the US dollar. And I'm really interested in seeing how this plays out because I've been in the bitcoin space since twenty sixteen, as you know, and I had some of the first bitcoin ATMs. I was buying bitcoin, you know, less than four hundred dollars a coin. And let's see the price as of five minutes ago, sixty three and fifty four Lucis Barium bankster notes make one bitcoin, and again at the

beginning of the year, we're in the thirty thousand dollars plus range. I've been watching this for a while. I've been telling people that bitcoin still has a story to tell, and again, the institutional money is in there. That's an open question. You and I have discussed that, you know, the big banksters like Larry Fink at Blackrock and others you know coming out and

support a bitcoin, calling it a store of value. I don't know if that's the kiss of death for any real commodity or good thing, but I do think there's going to be more and more money being pumped into bitcoin. I think it's going to drive the price up. This is again not investment advice, but you can look at people like Robert Kiyosaki. He was saying bitcoin to one hundred thousand by June of twenty twenty four, he'd put that

on his Twitter. You can go with reference Robert. So there's something going on here. And I think really the reason that bitcoin has such a rise, David, is because of the US dollar. Right. The underlying story there is the loss of purchasing power and the dollar the uncertainty there. Bitcoin is the complete opposite. Again, it's the nemesis for the dollar because it's finite. You can't they're not going to make new bitcoin. They're not going

to be printing it out of thin air. Right, there's no QE for bitcoin. But the supply of the US dollar is technically unlimited. And I even saw Jim Kramer is having a melt down. He said, what does bitcoin ever do for humanity? And I'm thinking, we do? You know this? Well? System kills people, Yeah, I mean it literally creates wars that shouldn't exist. It props up politicians and industries that shouldn't exist.

And when they done what they've done the last four years, especially with people on fixed income elderly, you just destroyed the purchasing power of their of their their checks and their dollars, and so now they have to choose between meals and medicine. That's real life consequences to the criminality of the central banking system. Whereas bitcoin has had, you know, as a store of value. It seems to be keeping pace. Again, not a complete endorsement of everything

that's going on with this ETF, but there's it's interesting to watch. Yeah. Yeah, as you said, we don't give financial advice. I give political advice to people. But so you have some life advice because I've been caught up in bubble markets, you know. And there's no shame in that, I guess because Isaac Newton, who could predict the tides with mathematical accuracy, could not predict the bubbles of his day. The south Sea bubble got

him the Tulip bubbles and things like that. I don't know if he got involved in both of those or one of those, but I know that he lost a fortune in that stuff. And we sure old Thomas Jefferson, as you know, I had to sell his library to the Library of Congress to pay his bills. And I think it was like he sold it for like twenty four thousand dollars or something like that. Did he get into something that?

Did he get tulip bulbs as well? A little bit mania? But yeah, yeah, you know again, just genius doesn't always translate into financial game. I just look at it, and you know, I have I have a lot of aversion to things a that are digital and virtual. I have a big a version of that, and I have a big aversion now because of the dot com bust. I have a big aversion to manias and

something that is very volatile. So I'm not interested in being rich and I don't want to be poor, So I want to preserve what I've got there. That's why I'm leaving. I know. Aaron Day came on and he's you know, he talks about he's focused on opposing the Fiat currency system and CBDs especially, and so he says, yeah, bitcoin, gold and silver is what he's focused on, but he's looking at all three. I just want something that is at this stage of my life that is not volatile,

that is not virtual, and it's something that's an a vault. There we go, there's the three vs. How about that? Well, I think the perfect fit for you is probably just physical precious metals. David, those seem to be steady in the face of all the economic uncertainty. As a matter of fact, that it looks like with the inflation data is pretty is pretty cool. So that's what they're saying. Inflation is pretty cool, right, it's cooled off, it's not it's not as hot as it used to

be. And I think that's that's a funny that's a funny term. But there that means that there's most likely going to be a rate lowering by the Federal Reserve, and so it's kind of counterintoitive. You would think that if you would think that that would signal a lot of things for precious metals, especially especially gold. But it's again, gold is going to go up based on them lowering rates, and because it's going to increase or decrease the purchasing

power, that all increase the money supply. So we're going to we're going to see I think there's been a spike and gold price in the last hour or two. Two thousand and forty eight Lucifer exter notes make a troy ounce of the yellow metal right now, So both gold and sober up over yesterday. And that's based off the the inflation so called inflation data coming in a little bit cooler than expected, so they're going to be lowering rates. We

you and I talked about this. They're going to lower rates. It's just going to I think they're going to wait for as long as they can to lower those rates because this is an election year. It needs it needs to show the benefits of that fake money being propped into the system. Mm hmmm. Yeah. It's interesting because you know my big fear too. It's not just the Fiat currency and inflation, but it's CBDC. And we just had

five senators offer a bill to oppose Biden's lust for a CBDC. It was Ted Cruz, Bill Haggerty, Rick Scott, Ted Budd and Mike Brawn introduced the CBDC Anti Surveillance State Act to challenge the Federal Reserves Authority to implement a CBDC. Now, this may not pass, This may just be an electioneering in an election year. But even if they're able to stop CBDC, you

still have d banking as happening extensively. We just had the museum that focuses on the Battle of Britain get debanked the UK after they did that to Nigel farage. They're doing it even to it's a memorial charity that is focused on the Battle of Britain. They have been debanked, you know. It is the whole system is so rigged. That's why I say, you know, that's one of the things that makes me concerned about things that are digital, things that are in the system, is because of this aspect of it,

and especially because I got debanked by PayPal and Venmo. If the show is when I went independent. Five months after I went independent, they pull the plug on paypald Venmo, and that's exactly what that was about. You know, now they've openly talked about that. But those are the types of things that get me concerned over and above you know, what's going on with bitcoin, over and above what's going on with them printing money and the money supply

and the inflation and all the rest of the stuff. It's that in your face tyranny that has me concerned. I'm concerned about it too because there tends to be and especially an economic uncertainty and down to and depressions. There's more consolidation by the majors when the smaller and regional banks go under, and that's where the pressure is first applied. You know, we began our talk talking about the Canadian pension fund that sold the high rise in New York City.

If their real estate holdings for a dollar, there's a massive commercial real estate bubble that's going to pop. And you know, Jerald Salente has been talking about that for years. It's been propped up by fake money and the central banks for the last four years, especially after the lockdowns in COVID nineteen eighty four. But we're going to see a major banking crisis, David. And you look at what happened last year with FTX and silver Gate Bank and Silicon

Valley Bank. Janet Yellen stepped in, they bailed out, They stopped the bleeding for then. But you know, she was asking a question, what about all the other banks? Are you guaranteeing as the Federal Reserve, as the Treasury going to guarantee that these banks will survive a systemic banking crisis? And her answer is basically, no, we don't guarantee anything. You know, you talk about the fd I C and what you're covered in your bank.

It's it's an opportunity. You've got to remember, it's an opportunity for the larger banks to gobble up the smaller banks, which is which we need that diversity. Yeah, the banks that I use for in both Texas and Missouri are independent banks. They're they're not they're not national brands. They have you know, enough branches to support me. But uh, businesses like mine will suffer under something like a Chase or a Bank of America and we can

easily be debanked. I've been debanked before. It's not pleasant, especially when you know I was young in the crypto space, before they even had crypto banks. They only have about two or three left as a matter of fact. But back then, I mean it was it was a game of musical chairs getting in just doing some buying a legal product and sending wires to the

exchanges. And I went through several banks that way. Of course, banks don't like cash, banks don't like utally my business where I'm wiring in and out all the time. It's not pleasant for them to keep up with. But luckily I have some good banks. But again, would that last through a major banking crisis and then have those banks being bought up? I don't think so. I wouldn't worried about that, not just politically, but just

in the financial realm that I'm in. And that's one of the reasons why you know, Katherine Austin Fitz and I've interviewed her, I've interviewed Senator Nicely.

She's in Tennessee. He is as well. And that's why they're working here at the Tennessee level to try to do something with a state bank, you know, to try to help the small and medium sized banks, because if you look at North Dakota's experience, they have way more small and medium sized banks than the average, way more than even the number two in terms of all that. And so the state is going to have to have and the people within a state are going to have to have some way to be

able to process financial transactions. You point out these really really big banks that are connected with the federal government, where a FED they're not going to be about that, whereas these small and medium sized banks will be more like that. But they just don't get They look at it, and they will state bank that's going to be a competition to me, And it isn't in North Dakota, and it isn't the way that they're talking about it here in Tennessee.

But they don't even understand the threat to them. They don't understand this is their ally, and they don't understand the threat to them from the reworking of the financial system and the threat that is being presented to them by the Federal Reserve. And that's the big problem. We just can't get people to understand who's on their side and who's their enemy anymore. They're very mich Yeah

they are. I mean the banking industry. You go in and talk to your banker, they don't even know what I'm talking about with central bank digital currency at most of them. Yeah, And these are people that work in the industry. They're surfacing accounts, they're making loans, and I start talking about do you understand what the implications of that would be? Where the FED takes over complete control of the money supply in real time and the accounts.

I mean, this is something that never has happened before. They're very surprised. And again they come back and say, well, I don't like any of that. Well, of course you don't, and they're just the language is for people like us. We notice it when the Biden administration puts out the executive order telling all the different you know the different agencies inside the executive branch to give a report on how they would implement central bank digital currency.

We take notice. Unfortunately, the people in the industries it will first affect because it would have to be a consolidation games. Matter of fact, let me read this tweet. This is Robert Kiyosaki. He says, this is three days ago. He says, please be careful. Banking crisis worsens, threat of war grows, central banks will push CBDC central bank digital currency to spy on us. I am buying more bitcoin and silver coins. Silver is the biggest bargain. I will use silver as money, not fake US dollars.

That's Robert Kiyosaki. These are some of the people that I follow who tend to have been right over the last twenty plus years. And uh, you know, I'm not. I'm not paying attention to Jim Kramer or Janet Yellen other than to other than to mock them, uh, and to be and steer clear of their of their decisions and the implication. So that's that's really. Remember it's always a crisis that's used to implement tyranny, and that's what we're going to have to be very careful of that's right. And and

and when we look at it, you know, CBDC. And of course the other aspect of this is where you're looking at the biometric identification visa is now jumping in along with a master slave card, you know, to put in. They patented a biometric data system. They have biometric data to scan people before they come into buy groceries or before they go to a ballgame.

And it's just everywhere. And so everything that you see is channeling us to this digital id UH, this permission society where they have to know you and know everything that you're doing. That's one of the reasons why I look at physical stuff that is outside of their purview, because we've got to start thinking about you know, we've never those of us who live in America and haven't lived in a foreign country, have never really operated in a gray market or

black market economy. We better start thinking about creating one. People are going to shut down everything with this biometric system. Yes, it's pretty eating. They'll create a control grid and we have to stay outside of it if we want any semblance of liberty or freedom or privacy. That's right. That's why gold and silver physical gold and silver absolutely important, and we can talk about

cryptocurrency, you can talk about having your own wallet. I think people should learn that I'm not fully endorsing that saying that's the I'm not a maximum list in that way, but just being outside of the dollar system absolutely imperative in our time, and there's no other way around it. Learn what the difference between currency and money. You know, we'll talk about this, hopefully every Thursday for a long time, and as we learn and grow, maybe the

audience can learn and grow with us. But I think this is the challenge of our time. It really everything tracks back to the fake currency system, David. It's causing most of the problems of not all of them that we face today on planet Earth. That's right. Yeah, when I go back to it, you know, I keep looking at you know, I talked a couple of times about the omission the last couple of weeks, and the key about where they drew the line was not they didn't want to have motors

or anything like that. You know, the reason they use horses and stuff. They want to keep it simple enough so that they're not dependent on anybody on the outside. You know, that's the key thing, and that's really their focus of what they're trying to do, to make sure that they are totally independent, that whatever they've got they can fix. We had some people when we were back in Texas. We needed to do some clearing on our property and leveling of some stuff, and we found a guy that was really

good. He was a Minnite, and I was surprised that he was using heavy equipment. But he's had like one Bobcat and he would just get in this Bobcat. I mean, that guy turned out a massive amount of work by himself, and he got into some areas where he got tangled up and it messed up the hose and everything, but he was able to fix it himself. You know, we didn't hear him for a while. We look at what's happening. He's out there down and fixing it. But he could

do everything with that Bobcat. Now, he couldn't manufacture a host to put in it, so he did have some dependency on outside sources. And again he was Mennonite rather than Amish, but he looked Onmish. He had the chin strap beard and things like that. He kept his head down and he kept working and he was like a one man show with he and his bobcat. I mean it was like his horse that he rode. He knew everything about that, And that's the key thing. I think that's what we have

to start targeting towards in our own lives. We need to start developing skills, but we also need to look at ways we can simplify things, keep them local so that we're not depending on an outside system, because the outside system is going to be shut down to every body based on your political, religious beliefs, and whatever else. They wanted to draw in to this as well. I think yes, And we learned this lesson over the last thirty

forty years plus because of free trade policies. This is a a glaring example. We used to be self sufficient with the manufacturing marvel of mankind. With arsenal democracy, we stopped making things because the corporations were given incentives to leave the United States and to not pay the fees and not stand here for deregulation and lower taxes. They left. And again there was a senator I believe in the late eighties as it doesn't matter if you make potato chips or computer

chips, we can import it well, guess what. A couple of years later, we had something called the Gulf War. We needed to make some of those Patriot Patriot missiles and we needed to import. It was eight different countries that we needed to import parts for the Patriot missile. So it did matter whether you made potato chips or computer chips. In order to be sovereign

and self sufficient. You learned that from free trade. Your supply chain is too spread out, or you get into what they're doing now of these farmers and like you've talked about many times, where John Deere and others, you can't even work on them. You can't get the parts. You can't do any of that because it has to come through their system and you have to like break it, you know, you have to hicheck the system in order to even work on your own equipment. So that's less less and less ability

to be self sufficient. And that's the goal, you know, not only of governments now but their partners and the multinational corporations. So it's up to us to continue to be decentralized as best as we can. Yeah, I don't know where they are right now, but years and years ago I started talking about that with Eric Peters with John Deere, and you could not even buy the replacement part and stick it in yourself. You had to take the dealers stick it in, or they would brick the whole thing for you.

You know, you didn't just pull this module out and stick another in. Its not going to let that happen either, even if it's an official module. You know, it's like they've started doing with inkjet printers. You know, they're getting very very careful about making sure they don't have any knockoff coffees. But it wasn't even about that. They had to be the ones to install it. And it is creating that kind of dependence and moving us out.

But you know, one of the themes that I've talked about Tony again is trying to look at local level, state level for solutions. And like I was talking about the d banking that's happening in the UK where they want to take this battle of Britain Society and dbank them or Nigel Fraj and d

bank him. In Tennessee, they've got a law now that would prohibit financial de banking for political and religious beliefs, and so you know, we can do things at the state level that we're not going to be able to get

done at the federal level. And again I'm glad that there's some senators who are pushing back against this CBDC stuff, but I don't really think that's going to go anywhere in Washington, and that all gets swept aside as you point out, you know, we've got some kind of declared financial emergency to take down the financial system. They'll just sweep all that stuff aside. But we can do some things still at the state level, especially at the local level,

and even do it independently ourselves. That's why I want to look at things that are going to try to simplify my life. You know when I when I look at this stuff, I agree with you one. On state level, that's that's our only hope, like it's our own, it's our only hope is the state and local level. I mean, I believe I was listening to someone talked the other day about New Hampshire. It's pushing back against central bank digital currency through the state legislature. Good so that if enough

states do that, it could it can be dead on arrival. I mean, they're still going to implement it. And again there's there will be crises surrounding this, watch out for it. But if if we work together on a state and local level, we can actually push back against CBDC, far more effective than some senators in Washington. Oh that that's a that's a that's a no go. That's a dead space. I agree with you. It's it's funny. There's so much voting and stuff going on now. I'm just

looking around. I'm like, I don't even know what to what to vote for at this point. What am I doing? They've got a national election coming up, and I'm thinking, well, you know, I don't know I'm gonna go to support programs like yours. I need to get out more information. I want to do stuff on the local level and talk to people in the grassroots. But yeah, I just I grew up paying attention to politics, David, and I just I'm not interested at all. It does

not spark my interest. Well, you look at what happened in Michigan yesterday, and of course at bablin Bee's got a joke headline it says there's an argument breaks out between the people who are supporting uncommitted and the none of the above people. They're arking about you know which one of these things that we

look for here and that's really where we are. It's like, you know, this is such a ridiculous selection that is there, and it just you know, heightens the importance of working at a local level because that's the only way you're going to get things done. Tell us what's going on at Why

is Wolf? Well, we've got a lot going on. Actually, there is a lot of product that I've just purchased from the trading floor that's going to be put into a wolf pack, a lot some stuff that we've never put in the packages before, so you got to go check out wolf Pack. We've got some sponsorships that are going to be coming up soon, so it'll be doing a lot more media. So the pack is growing. That's great because better prices for everybody. Goldbacks are now going in every single order.

That's something I've implemented in the last month, and we're buying more goldbacks. I'm usually making them in the dollar denominations into different states like New Hampshire and Utah and Wyoming and others. So we got a little bit of diversity there, but had just a lot of great stuff going in the wolf Pack. I'm excited about it. We're seeing price prices move a bit in the gold and silver market, but I was able to buy some stuff in the

last two or three weeks to save people money. I think I think we bought like I want to say, like six thousand ounces of Canadian silver Maya liefs that we're putting in. Those are sealed in the boxes, so I'm able to get to pass those. I think we saved people like three dollars per unit on those based on what you would have paid if you've gone to

some of the majors. So those are some of the things that we're really proud of with wolf Pack, and it just allows us to to get people, you know, on a monthly basis that we did the opposite of talking to a friend of mine last night saying, you know, most gold and silver companies they don't do this for a reason. I mean, you talk about the infrastructure you have to put in. If you look at the total dollar amount that I bring in, it's like, you know that most of

them are looking for this. In one transaction, somebody's IRA rollover or four to one K. So I'm doing something from the bottom up and seeing something different and there's a reason they don't do it, but I think we just we've hit a nerve with people because they really like it. There's something that there's something that I think it's a really good fit. We have a low

cancelation rate and so happy to to support your program. We also do direct sales and you know iras and four oh one k rollovers and all that stuff too. M hm. Through through Wise Wolf and David Knight Dog Gold. But keep paying attention to the to the Wolf pack. It's fun. I really like the the paper gold stuff and the little chick lit things that you know, break off for both gold and silver to make it a smaller amount. I think those are are great ideas, especially uh you know, you

got the gold, you got the silver there. But it's also something that in the future may be very important to be able to break that down in the smaller units that are there. So a lot of fractional stuff. Yeah. Yeah, Aaron Day when I interviewed him, you know again about CBDC, he said, yeah, he leaves the paper gold for people as a tip and an explanation as to what that is. You know what that's about,

why that's important? So uh and that's that's the thing. We have to kind of be selling the idea, even on an individual basis, you know, to people in the community where we live, how the importance of cash, the importance of you know, getting outside of this system, because again they're trying to drive cash out, and they drive cash out, that's going to be very very concerning for us. We need to have some kind of you know, financial transaction privacy is I think, is what Catherine Austin

Fitz calls it. They did it pretty quickly during the scamdemic. I mean that's when they stopped the importation of dollars that were from other countries being put back into the system. And I thought, well, this is a tell. And then they said, well we're running out of running out of coin.

Remember the coin shortage. I said, there's no coin shortage. They're just not taking the deposits these small businesses that they've they've nooked, you know with with the shutdown and saying you're not essential that all those deposits aren't being made. So that's that's the issue. It's not really a shortage, is those deposits aren't getting made and there's still they're still out there. So yeah,

they will go after that. And this just makes it more imperative for us to have real sound, actual money outside of the system to trade with you. I want to say too, David, we got about what fifty six minutes left on the show something like that. Yeah, I tell you what on Rumble this is. We want to make sure this is and we get a leap here, so we get one more you'll get an extra We've

got one extra day to make sure you get your gauge over. I will match any donations on Rumble starting now, so to the end of the hour. Thanks so very one. Let's get David over the over the line for February. It's a short month and we were given one extra day every four years. We get one, so I'll match anything on Rumble. I'll check Rumble here at the end of the stream. If you donate to David, I'll match it, send him a cash app later. Thank you so much,

Tony. That is so kind of you, and we really do appreciate your support of this program. Always have been there and I've known Tony before I started this program and he's been a key supporter from the very beginning. So thank you so much, Tony. I really do preank you. Thank you all right again, Tony Ardeman. You can get to Wisewolf Gold via David Night dot Cold. He set that up and you're going to see us. One last thing before you go there. We say up yet on the

our need to talk to Travis about it. Make sure no, he's shaking his head. No. No, we're not set up yet on your on your new radio broadcast things. So we've got to get on that as well. That's one thing we've got to do. Yeah, we'll speak about that. We're making some changes over there, are going to do a relaunch too. We've we've experienced growing pains with software and things, and I think we've got a better handle on it. So there's going to be some announcements coming

soon. A lot of the nights of the Storm. Jason Barker's Angry Tiger over there, and we've got others and you know I broadcast over there. But it's it's been it's been a challenging issue with some of the software, which we are fixing. And then we'll definitely we'll want to launch having you there every day. That'd be great, that'd be great. Well, thank you very much. I really do appreciate the offer to match this here in

the last hour. Thank you so much, thank you. Okay, Sooks, We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. Stay with us. If you like the Eagles on the Cars and Healey Lewis and the new They Say the Horrors, you'll love the Classic Hits. Channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen now at APS radio dot com. You're listening to the David Night Show. My foot thing here. Sorry about the delay here. Let's talk a little bit about what is going on.

Just mentioned this briefly. It's babelon b thing the what's going on with Trump here? The new whole finds a presidential race, a dead heat between uncommitted and none of these Bablin b headline dead heat between the Democrat incumbent, uncommitted and the Republican opponent, none of these. One person said, I'm a team none of these all the way. It is not that I'm uncommitted. I know good and well that I want none of these fools to be

president. See, the problem is the office, right, The whole system is corrupt. The elections are rigged from the very beginning, from the ballast and everything else. But our whole concept of the office of presidency has now been corrupted. We're all out there looking for a caesar to rule us, and we've been trending in this direction for a very long time. I remember

the first time they started talking about a drugs are, a drugsar. You know, William Bennett so proud of the fact that he was called a drugs are. It's like, why is that something that you would even accept as somebody, as an American official, elected or otherwise. That should be antithetical. You know, we had Caesar in the Roman Empire after he crossed Rubicon and that was the end of the Roman Republic. Why would we embrace that

type of authoritarianism. But they like that, They like being in charge, embossing other people around. That's what these people in politics are looking for, and now that's what the grassroots people are looking for as well. Both left and right want a caesar to rule us and to get even with their enemies. They fear the nation will soon tear itself apart over how much they hate

everyone running for president. Yeah, we could have a civil war. That is not about any principle, it's just over these different policies, you know, and that has been throughout history, that has been the cause of most civil wars, hasn't it. Well, I'm loyal to this guy who I want to be king, and loyal to this other guy that you want to be king. It isn't that we want self governance or we're not going to fight over principles. No, we're going to fight over who's going to be

king. And that's what I see shaping up in our elections. Finally, in the bablinbe story, they say at publishing time, no opinion entered the race as a viable third party candidate as opposed to uncommitted it another above. And of course they're talking about the uncommitted stuff because that happened yesterday in the Democrat primaries and the Republican primaries in Michigan. They have instead of a none of the above, they have uncommitted as one of the options on the ballot.

And there was actually an organized campaign by Muslim voters and there's a tremendous number of Muslim voters in Michigan. They have now become a voting block. And so this was Rashida Talib, who is a Palestinian I hesitate to call her a Palestinian American because she really doesn't care about America. She's like ilhan

Omar, I'll never forget when she had to leave got elected. You know, she was waving the Palestinian flag and her mother was there and they were doing the la la lula thing you know that women do in those Arab Muslim countries. And you know, it's like what and back home, everybody's so excited back home. So America is not your home. Palestine is your home. We said, it's happening. Ilhan Omar, I'm here to get the

Americans to do this for our home and everything. And again, you know, you have these different special interest groups, whether it is Palestinian or Somalia or Jewish. You know, the people wearing their own uniform, wearing their Israeli defense thing to congressman to Congress. I mean, none of these people put America's interest first. If they care about America's interest at all, it's

about this foreign country. And so these people who have an interest in foreign politics decided that they were going to organize a protest of Biden over is a support of Israel and Gaza. It was an uncommitted campaign. And the campaign called itself listened to Michigan, but actually it was listened to Muslims is what it was about, Listen to Palestinians. It led and targeted toward the Muslim and Arab American community. And they had a goal. They wanted to get

ten thousand votes. Well they got thirty three thousand in the Republican side and they got over one hundred thousand on the Democrat side. Nobody likes what is being offered to us. I have on This is a message from Travis the c This is before Tony announcing the donation matching on rumble ratisbro. Thank you very much. He says, how can bitcoin ETF juice the market when actual bitcoin from wallet to wallet isn't being traded, isn't all on paper, hence

it's an ETF. Well again they can. They can juice the markets, or they can go in the other direction. That's why I say, you know, stay away from the ETFs for gold and silver. They're manipulating the markets for gold and silver as well. So these institutions can get in and they can, you know, use it's a derivative and again very much in character like what you saw with the mortgage derivatives that created the mortgage crisis in

the mid two thousands. Once these people create these these financial structures that are really fiat, just like the fiat currency, they can take something like bitcoin or gold and they can start messing with it like it was a fiat currency. That's why I like to stay out of the stock market. I like all the stuff and just have something that's simple and physical. Well to simplify my life. You know, as you get older, you start looking for

comfortable clothes and investments that you're comfortable with as well. Also on rumble Pam, Now, thank you very much. I appreciate that. I appreciate that that if only we could have a true Christian for our present a last, we must focus locally and ignore the propaganda, live not by lies. I absolutely agree. That's why I said, you need to start focusing on Christian

localism. Christian localism, and that begins with you and I. Right, we focus that's the most local you can get, what is our relationship with God, and then we build out from that to our family, to our neighborhood and community, maybe to our state. But we begin at the grassroots level and move up. And once we start to put everything you know, centralization and power from above that ought to be antithetical to everything that's American,

but it ought to be. You know, something that we look at as Christians and understand that just how easy it is for an institution to be corrupted. As many people have said, you know, rots from the head down. It's the Greek proverb. And we've seen this as Christians. We've seen this over and over again and large institutions. Once you start creating large institutions, they began to rot from the head down. And we've seen many Christian

institutions do that as well. And so we should all be looking for ways to keep this personal, to keep it local. And we put our hope in God. We put our hope in Christ. We don't put our hope in chariots or horses or men. And you know, we try to move this. But as the person said, you know what if we had a Christian well, we always can pray for that. And God can change anybody's heart and change their circumstances. So you know, maybe the best thing that

can happen to Trump, and maybe he could lose everything. I don't know even that would bring him down. I mean, they're going to have to, you know, give him the Nebukinezer treatment. Is what kind of to do with the Trump? I think that as I had one pastor who said, yeah, you know, sometimes we don't ever know why things happen that are difficult. But he said, well, I'd always be open to that. You know, am I having this financial problem here because put too much

expectation and money that type of thing. And he said, sometimes you know, God's just trying to hitch you upside the head with a two by four to get you to pay attention, and if you don't pay attention, he

gets a bigger hammer. It's like, yeah, I've had times in my life when it's been like that, I think in retrospect, so we never can It's difficult when we're going through something's difficult, that is a trial, it's difficult to know, but you know, we just our response should be not so much trying to ask why is this happening, but to try to get closer to God, because regardless of what is happening, that's the answer. If it's something, if God's trying to get my attention because I've been

drifting away or anything else that has happened. You know, the answer is always to get closer to God if you're being attacked by somebody else for some reason. On Rumble, this is after the Tony announcement, Freakin thank you very much and said thank you for the match Tony. Yes, I really do appreciate Again. Tony Ardaban said he would match the tips to try to get us up here at the end of the month. On Rumble, Guard Goldsmith good to see you, Guard, Thank you for so much for that.

He said, you both spread the great information. Cheer from New Hampshire to y'all. Happy Thursday. Thanks Tony, thank you very much. Joe Nationalists, thank you, and he says, thank you Tony and David Speatrow six. Thank you for the tip, he says, thanks Tony, Mark M two two eight. He says, there's a little something extra for a DK since Tony is matching donations here. Thank you so much. I appreciate that. Hippopotamus. On Rumble, I love the show. David and Tony,

thank you. Macker seven, thank you for the tip, he says, thanks for matching Tony. God bless you and your family. David, thank you. Why Jay seventy two. Tony is the real deal. Throw you David. Thank you well. I appreciate that, and I really do believe that about Tony, really do Junk Silver again, thank you so much, and he did the matching contribution earlier. He says, thanks for matching

Tony. Let's feel that tank and wash the windshield. Thank you. You've done a lot to help us. Thank you, John Silver, appreciate it. Colton Kimberly, thanks for matching Tony Ardeman and Boone Boon Doc eighty four, thanks for doing it right. David. Cheers from Chicago. Oh, thank you. See somebody's listening in Chicago, deep blue state, some thing like this. Albut I don't like to use those colors, as I've said Dad Guy twenty four, thank you, he says. Cheers David Knight and

Wise Wolf gold and silver from Pat the Plumber. Thank you. Jim Z seven says thanks David, thank you, Jimsy and John twenty four fifty nine, thank you very much, and he thanks me and Tony. Same with Sarno, who thanks us both. Thank you. That's been he says, God bless that has been a real blessing to us. So thank you to Tony for the matching, and thank you to all of you who have But then oh and on rock Fann Dougalug, thank you very much. I appreciate

that. And so let's talk about what is happening again. You know, we're kind of on the money thing, but the uncommitted people again, it was organized by Rashida Talib's sister. Actually, and as they point out, Talib's district covers Dearborn, Michigan, over half of the population is of Mid Eastern and North African descent. In that interesting you understand how this has changed, This open border stuff is and this open immigration is changing the face of

America. That's how we get people like Rashida Talib, That's how we get people like Ilhan Omar. And what is happening with this. You know that one hundred thousand plus votes that voted uncommitted to protest Biden. As they point out, that was nine times what Trump's ten thousand, seven hundred and four vote victory margin in twenty sixteen over Hillary Clinton. So that's a significant you know, that's a kind of a bellwether state, a pivot state, and

he won it by ten thousand. Michigan has one of the largest Muslim populations in America, and of course, you know probably Minnesota is also up there, but you know, the Somalis around Saint Paul Minneapolis is one person I knew who lived there, So they used to call it Little Mogadishue because there's

so many Somalis that had come in. The Supreme Court has weighed in on some of these Trump trials and they have thrown, as the New Republic says, a huge wrench into the schedule, and it is what there's a big wrench for the Democrats. They wanted to accelerate this hoping that they could get a conviction of Trump before the election. Regarding January the sixth, you got all these civil trials that are out there. I don't think they don't believe

that's going to affect the independence. And that's what they're doing a lot of this for. It is making the Republican base stronger for Trump. It's making the Democrat base stronger against Trump. But they're doing a lot of this stuff for the independence. And if the Independents don't see a criminal conviction, they probably will dismiss a lot of this back and forth civil stuff that is there.

And quite frankly, I think the action is being taken by this, you know, this half a billion dollars that they want, when there was nobody harmed by any of the Trump fraud this time around. I mean, people have been harmed by Trump fraud and his private life in the past, and certainly we were all harmed by his fraud in twenty twenty with a pandemic. Yet nevertheless, you know, people look at this and understand that this

is purely political, this persecution. It's bad actors and the justices system, justice system there in New York. It's also a bad law that is there being wrongly applied, I think. But this Jenny with six trial has now been put on hold. They said, it's very unlikely. Unimaginable, said one person, a former Pellet judge. Unimaginable that it will happen before the election. And that's exactly what Trump would like to have happen with that.

But he'd and I see another tip there from be Slice. Thank you very much, he says, thanks, David. Have you ever tried getting Ryan shall Hobby on the show? You know, I haven't. I do cover a lot of his articles, and I should reach out to him and see if he would like to come out. I don't know if he does shows or if he just does articles. I know he's also got a business that he does. Between that, I don't know if he if he actually does interviews, but I should reach out to him. So that was in his

favor from the Supreme Court. However, other things did not go his way. There's been another local judge, and this one in Chicago and Cook County, who said they're going to keep Trump off of the state ballot there in Illinois, again treating him as if he was guilty of insurrection. Well, he hasn't been found guilty of insurrection, but they're going to say, well, we're going to apply the fourteenth Amendment because he was involved in an insurrection,

he can't be on the ballot. Well, there hasn't been any trial about that. And furthermore, the Supreme Court has weighed in and you know they're going to be making a decision about whether or not Colorado can keep him off the ballot. And so again this is something that made the news, but it's not really going to have any impact on this because the Supreme Court is the one going to be deciding that. Now, if the Supreme Court says, yes, localities can do that. Then he'd be off the ballot

in Colorado and Illinois probably two states that he wouldn't win anyway. But I think it's interesting, you know, when you look at the fact that he's being treated as if he was guilty of something he hasn't been convicted for. Haven't we seen that in the past, right, isn't Julian Assigne being you know, murdered essentially for something that he didn't do. Didn't that begin under the Trump administration. Didn't he have a chance to pardon Juliana Signe and he

passed up on that. Alex was saying, Oh, he's going to do it before midnight you January the twentieth. No, he didn't do it. So when you also look at civil asset forfeiture, isn't that an example of how people who have not been found guilty as a matter of fact, not even charged where the crime are punished, in many cases excessively punished with civil

asset forfeiture. That's something's been directed by the federal government, especially the Department of Justice, under Republican and Democrat administrations, and it went on throughout the entire Trump administration as well, or you look at somebody else that we were hoping Trump might pardon ross Albrick of Silk Road, the fact that he was

given three consecutive life sentences. The Justice Department came after him because they wanted to make a point about bitcoin, because they want to make a point about websites that were operating on what they call the dark web. There's nothing really any more sinister that happens on the dark web than happens on the regular Internet. It's just that they don't have as much visible. It's dark to them,

and they wanted to shut that down. And they had exculpatory evidence that would have created doubt about his guilt, the fact that there were a couple of FBI agents that are being tried at exactly the same time that had the keys to the website and had embezzled nearly a million dollars. But ross Albricks team was not allowed to talk about that in court, and then when the sentencing came, the judge referenced allegations and they didn't even rise to the extent

of a grand jury indictment. He wasn't even indicted, let alone found guilty, but they said, well, there's been allegations that on this website, which is being also run by some rogue FBI agents have the keys to it, there's allegations that he was doing murder for hire on soilk Rude. So the judge used that for which he had not been indicted, had not had trial, had not been found guilty, used that to give him three consecutive licences, so he can never get out of jail, a young man for

a life in prison. And so his mother, Lynn Elbrick I interviewed multiple times and had her hopes up that maybe Trump would do it. But who did Trump pardon? He pardoned a lot of extremely wealthy white collar criminals like him, like him, and now it's turning around to come on to him. You know, it's kind of again this persecution. I don't like to see political persecution, but there's some justice, and it isn't there to see some of the same stuff that he set by allowed to happen to other people,

cared nothing about. Why should I care about Trump when he didn't care about the innocent being punished. So he's now lost a bid to pause this four hundred and fifty four million dollar judgment. Of course it's a crew at around one hundred thousand dollars a day. With the interest that's going up, he has lost his bid to put that on pause. He was asking for

a lot of different things. And just to show you how rigged this whole thing was this judge and gern Not only did they hit him with this excessive fine, and you know, the lawyers working for Trump or right about this, they said the exorbitant, imputitive amount of the judgment, coupled with an unlawful and unconstitutional blanket prohibition on lending transactions, would make it impossible to secure

and post a complete bond. In other words, not only was the amount of the money involved excessive, and again, was there really a crime when nobody was harmed by it? Well, according to the standards of the New York law, they make that a crime. Shouldn't be but they did make it a crime. But they even put prohibitions against him borrowing the money. You're going to have to have this in cash. Well, nobody keeps, you know, even billionaire who's invested in stuff by that is not that liquid.

So that almost makes me want to defend him, almost not quite not going to do that. I will say I don't like corruption. I don't like corruption when it's done by democrats. I don't like coruption when it's done by Trump. And it's kind of what goes around comes around. It is in a sense, there is a sense of justice to this. But he did get a win to some extent from the judge who agreed that this blanket prohibition on lending transaction should be removed, and he was right about that.

The appellate judge it's also ruled that Trump's sons Junior and Eric could run the company. They were going to be banned from doing anything about that. I mean, that shows just how biased Ingern is. However, you know, this is all going to be done as I had the state system. Now I showed the supremes the other day, you know, the fact the New York Supreme Court had six judges and everything. I thought that it would go up, you know, from the suppellate court to the Supreme Court. I

figured the Supreme Court was going to be supreme. But it seems like they've got a lot of different appellate things and the Supreme Court has certain things that they hear and so most likely will not be going before Diane and the Supremes six black women, with black women representing one and a half percent of the lawyers there, but of the Supreme Court are black women. How's that for

DEI? But that is not going to be the case still. I don't think that he's going to get an honest trial anywhere in New York, and it's not going to go in the federal system either. But I want to talk about what is happening within his legal crew here because I think it is truly amazing what Alena Hobba is doing. But I want to acknowledge some of the people have left tips as Tony is doing the matching here. B Turner one seventy, thank you very much, Thank you, David, and to

Tony for matching donations on Rumble, thank you. On Rockfinn Max B thank you, he says, thanks for the matching, and David, for all the work you do for us means a lot. I really do appreciate that. And on Rumble Delta Mike eighty three eighty four, thanks David for sounding the alarm. God is the answer. Thank you for acknowledging that we need his kind of wisdom, wisdom which leads to action. That's right. It's not enough just to say to your neighbor when there's something happening, well,

you know, I hope everything works out for you. Go on your way, and may you be well clothed and fed. Right. No, if it's in our power to do something about it, we need to do something about it. And there are some things that we can do. And if we get misdirected into activities that are not going to make a difference, that is the key thing that we need to be looking out for. And that's

why I talk about this. It's not just, you know, to rag on Trump, even though I'm very angry at how he betrayed this country, how he joined with the globalist agenda more so than any other political leader in the world. He created the shots, and he did all the lockdown masks and social distancing that everybody else is doing at the same time. But he created the shots, and he used our money to create the shots and to

make Pfiser moderna wealthy. So I've got a beef with Trump, But nevertheless, you know, one of the main reasons I focus on this is because I don't want to see people putting their hope in Trump don't put your hope in as as Patrick Henry said, trust no man, but buying them down with the chains of the Constitution and when it comes to your life. And I just keep looking at the story about this and the development and all the other stuff about the guy who set himself on fire, you know, just

protesting things, even that kind of extreme protest. Is there's a place for protests, certainly, not a place for suicide, not a place for despair. If you were trusting in God, you don't need to despair. And that's why I want people to focus on that on Rumble, Michael de Silvio, have you ever tried getting Peggy Hall on the show? No, I haven't. It's a familiar name, but I'm not I can't place it right now. And let's see. Vohar is now a monthly supporter on Rumble.

Thank you very much. I really do appreciate that. Thank you. Let's talk a little bit about what is going on with his attorney, Elena Haba. She insisted ten days ago on the nineteenth February, just as we had the judge slap it down and say no, you're not getting any more time on this stuff. You know, how is he going to get together alone maybe you know. I don't know, but you know, Jacob Rothschild just

died last week, so I know he's going to get sick. Had the Rothstyles bailed him out with his casinos once before, but I don't know if he can, you know, pull that chain again. But his attorney was saying ten days ago he didn't need it. She said he has lots of cash and will be able to pay the roughly thirty five million dollar bond on his thirty hundred and fifty five million dollar fraud verdict in thirty days. But

she won't say if he will have to sell off his assets. So this is what was reported with multiple interviews that she did the Trump will post of the fifty four million dollar ruling in the fraud trial, and of course it's going up very rapidly. And we now see that just like Trump, she was filled with empty boasting right very much just like him, said he had lots of cash to pay for all of this, and here she is talking about his money. So Judge Angern says that he wants this three hundred and

fifty million dollars within thirty days. Now, I know that you're planning on appealing this, but you've still got to put up the full amount pending that appeal. Does Donald Trump have that kind of money sitting around? Yes, I mean he does. Of course he has money. You know, he's a billionaire. We know that. And oh yeah, he's got that kind of no problem, he's a billionaire. He's got all that kind of money.

And she told the same story multiple times a multiple interviews. With one of them another one she said, she said, I can tell you what the rules are. Within thirty days, even if we choose to appeal this, we will have to post the bond, which is the full amount, and then not the ten percent that was in the headline of that. We will be prepared to do that. She said. Bond agents typically charge nine

percent as a form of insurance in order to put up the money. She says, what we're trying to do, between this case and my last case, what they're trying to do is to put him out of business. In other words. The other one was the gene what's her name, you know, case about rape and defamation. She said, this isn't going to work. She said, this is a scare tactic and they picked the wrong person.

But it appears that Trump has picked somebody who's just like him. You know, she was paid three and a half million dollars and she's talking about Trump. She says, Trump, he's strong, he's resilient, and he happens to have a lot of cash. Well, you know, she's been making the round. She's become something of a celebrity apprentice herself, and so she's making all these talk show rounds talking about herself, bragging about how strong,

resilient, and rich Donald Trump is. There's what she had to say about herself on one of the shows. Somebody said to me, Elena, would you rather be? Would you rather be smart or pretty? And I said, oh easy, pretty. I can fake being smart. I meet him all the time. Maybe she's not very good at faking either one. I don't know. Then it's gonna make me, you know, I'm sure there'll be some Washington Post article about it tomorrow. Daily Beast my favorite.

But listen, like you have to be honest. It doesn't hurt to be good looking in this world, in the pr world on TV, it doesn't hurt. And when you're good looking, that's great, but it can also mean people think you're stupid or people think that President Trump hired me because I was good looking. That is absolutely not the case. I feel pretty, oh so pretty, I feel pretty and gay, PANDOI pretty anny good in me to day. I feel charming, oh so charming. It's charming.

I feel and so pretty Nary. Yeah, I can hardly believe she's really there. You know. Yeah, Steven Soinheim, he had great lyrics and he did feel gay as well. I think it's kind of known for that, uh yeah, west Side story there. Trump is made to be worth more than two billion dollars, but much of his wealth is tied up in partnerships and complex real estate holdings, including two dozen buildings and a domestic, domestic and overseas golf and real estate empire. Does she know that? Is

she fake? Which is she faking? Is she faking the prettier, the smart or whatever? Of course, the pretty doesn't last too long, and maybe the smart is not going to last too long either. But again, she got paid three and a half million dollars. Where'd that money come from? Well, it came from the Save America Pact? Do you remember that? That was? Save America was the thing that he set up as part of the January sixth grift, isn't that interesting? And they're paying his legal

fees. Almost all of it came from Save America. She has been paid three million, five hundred and eighty six thousand and three point four to eight million. Of that came from the Save America pack That was the donation thing that Trump set up. He made two hundred and fifty million dollars that he fleeced his supporters for between the election and January the sixth. That's what he's

paying his legal expenses out of now paying her for that. So and that was paid between February of twenty twenty two and of June twenty twenty three. She made three and a half million dollars from that, speaking of how smart

she is the trials, they call it being bench slapped. Bench slapped Trump attorney Elena Habba acted more like a lawyer when the former president was not in the room, so as one of the lawyers for Egene Carroll her courtroom antics during the defamation trial, as people said, the lawyer who opposed her said, she acted more like a lawyer when the former president wasn't around and buzzing in her ear. You could definitely see a difference between her sort of style

when he was in the courtroom and when he was not there. He said she was much more disciplined and frankly acted more like a lawyer when Trump was not in the Manhattan Federal courtroom. Yeah, it was very contentious back and forth, and the judge threatened her repeatedly over her conduct. When Trump was in the court, he said, you could hear him telling Haba when to

and muttering things and loudly being frustrated with her. I think she felt like she had to say things to the judge and to us and sort of put on a performance. Hey, she's getting paid millions of dollars for this, of course, I think that she had a hard job. In the same interview, Carol's attorney, ROBERTA. Caplan, said that Haba regularly yelled at US District Judge Lewis Kaplan during the trial. They're at the civil trial,

Haba repeatedly frustrated the judge. In a single day, the judge bench slapped Haba at least fourteen times over basic law, and on Friday even threatened to send her to jail for interrupting. Well. The bottom line is that he does not have the cash to stay the judgment penning appeal, and, as one anti Trump website put it, just like in the Wizard of Oz, we are getting a look behind the curtain at Trump's business empire and learning that

it wasn't what he portrayed. See, that's the interesting thing right now. Nobody was harmed by his inflated financial statements, except interestingly enough, Trump, because now he doesn't. He's pointed out, He's got all of this money and all this, but he doesn't have the money to pay for these fines. They bumped the fines up to beyond what they believed that he had in cash. After seeing what his real financial statements were, Trump's business empire and

learning that it isn't what he portrays. After Trump and Alena Habba claimed in his deposition and on statements to the media that he had quote plenty of cash, as I've just shown you to put up the money to stay the imposition of any judgments pending appeal, it appears that it was all just a lie, like everything else. And it's a perfect example of what is going on because on the one hand, on the Democrat side, we have them it's

a criminal persecution, not a prosecution. He's being persecuted by the Democrats. He's being persecuted unjustly with this law. But at the same time we see all of this endless, empty boasting by Trump and by his lawyer about what they are capable of doing. And isn't that perhaps the best picture of his career even as president, all this empty boasting from the Democrats while they are

unjustly and criminally running this country. Trump is there and he's bragging about all the different things that he can do, and he's just, you know, he can't. He can't write the checks for what he's bragging about. At the same time, yesterday we had this judge who was railroading him in garn got an envelope with white powder sent to him. This just happened to Donald Trump Junior a week or so ago. And you know, when that happens,

it's kind of like your house getting swatted. Everything comes that they have to go through and clean everything out and test what this is. And so but I don't know, maybe this is just a guess as anybody checked to see what Hunter Biden is doing. I mean, when you get your a political figure and you get you get an envelope of white powder in it, and I just wonder if it's Hunter Barden. Hunter Biden is having a party somewhere. Forgot to put in the invitation. But yeah, it is a

This is going back and forth for both sides here. Finally, Mitch McConnell glitch has said that he is going to step down from leadership. He says it's time to get somebody else a chance with this. Well, it was time for somebody else to have a chance back in twenty twenty when he ran for reelection. But just as we have seen with Dianne Feinstein, with Darth Vader Ginsburg and others like that, they seem to think that they're going to

live forever and they get into a situation. You know, Mitch McConnell is and it's not that he's all that old, especially by American politicians standards, since we have a gerontocracy right now, have people a lot of people even in their late seventies, mid eighties and things like that that are there. But he is in bad help. You know, he's frozen up several times. He had a very bad fall as well, and he says he's not going to resign he's going to stay in office. He's just resigning as the

leader of the Republicans in the Senate. And again I'm not a McConnell supporter. I think he's betrayed us on a number of issues, most recently of course the wars and things like that. But he is major betrayal on allowing this bluff of the Paris Climate so called accord as a treaty. He should have called their bluff. All of the the Consenators should have called the bluff, but especially Mitch McConnell. So many I don't support him on issues at

all. But if he dies before his term is over, and of course if he dies before the election in twenty twenty six, then Democrat Andy Basheer, who's governor in Kentucky, will be able to replace him, and he can put a Democrat in there. That's why I said he should not have run in twenty twenty because of his health issues. And so it's a bit of a denial about it, which makes me think, all that's why when you look at these people in power and how they want to just keep going

and going and going. Pelosi is another one. I wonder if there's a lot more to the health issue than as actually being publicly talked about. And if he does die before the next election, there'll be a Democrat put in there. And once somebody gets put in and it's really hard to get them out, we'll be right back. If you are listening to the David Night Show, tell Alexa to add the APS radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere, from country to blues, classic hits to news. APS

Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com. All right, in the ten minutes or so, I want to respond to some emails that I've gotten and some good tips from some stories.

Chris sends this, and he says, you know, when I first read about the many tens of millions of ghost donations in twenty twenty and twenty twenty two, it immediately occurred to me that this was where much of the Ukraine money was going, and why they were so frantic to push more funding, even though the Ukrainians have lost and the weapons being funded aren't even made and

won't be delivered for months and years. It's also why they were so adamantly against tracking and auditing all the money, and of course when they do audit Pentagon money, they have failed all their They supposedly done audits for the last six years and they failed every single one of them, not even close. But what he did was and you know, we look at what is happening

with Ukraine. Of course it is loaded with corruption. People even the people who supported the Ukraine Ukrainian side said they've had money and weapons have been leaking out for the eight years that civil war was being prosecuted by the CIA installed government in Ukraine. During that civil war, for eight years, the money and the weapons that were there were all disappearing. And it's gotten even worse now with this stuff coming in. But it was just a tremendous amount of

corruption. There is that going to be channel back to the politicians, certainly in one way or the other, because of course the military industrial complexes. You know, we look at Mitch McConnell as somebody like that, the military industrial complex is going to be supporting through legal channels, not necessarily through underground contributions, but they'll do it through legal channels, through political action committees and

things like that. They will support the politicians who support their wars and this is a big part of that war. A big part of the war is training and testing out tactics and things like that. I saw this even going back to the Vietnam War. It's very very apparent to me just watching what was happening as a teenager, but then even more apparent when I was at Texas Instruments one of the groups that I interviewed with, because when you go

there, they have a lot of different groups that you interview with. I was not interested in working with them, but they were making some of the missiles, and some of them had gone back to the Vietnam period, and so you know, there was Vietnam gave them a chance to develop more sophisticated weapons. You know, just as you have the military industrial complex that creates

these weapons. They use it as approving ground and a testing ground. The military uses it as training for their soldiers, so they're have combat experience and things like that, and so that's one of the reasons that they have these

wars. And as you look at this, it's pretty obvious on social media as a different groups are pushing out videos of the capability of the machinery and so, as I mentioned, you know, the m one Abrams tank, which is still the state of the art tank even though it's decades old. Maybe they've made some improvements, I'm sure they have in the end reading way, but it's still basically a tank that's been around for a long time.

The tanks are not doing that well in these battles, and we've seen multiple video of Germany's Leopard two tanks getting destroyed by Russians, easily done by these attack drones from above. And so there were pictures of the first in one Abrams tank to see battle and they show going down this muddy road and it fires and you see some explosion in the distance. It hits its target,

and then another explosion hits another target forther on. It's like, yay, look at this, and it's like, you know, a video of a Ford truck, you know, taking on rugged terrain or something. Right, it's the marketing thing. And within a few days the Russians destroyed it and they took pictures of it burning and put it out there. This is the

back and forth that's happening with the military industrial complex. It's a big business and you know, they really don't care if people are dying, because it's really about the money for them, just like it is for the pharmaceutical companies. And so Chris sends this thread about campaign finance and specifically Letitia James one of the most aggressively political DOJ type of people, like she's Attorney General but not of New York, who's coming after Trump, and she's come after a

lot of political figures. She's the one who had the ambition of shutting down the entire NRA over allegations of inappropriate conduct by Wayne Lapierre and others that was shut down by the judge. Say, you can't shut down the NRA for what they're doing. The NRAs in general is not guilty of this, but they did hit Wayne LaPier with a massive fine, and one other individual that was there also had a fairly large fine. The third individual did not get

fined. But anyway, she is very, very political, and so this person said, let's look at where does she get her money? She said. James was elected as a New York Attorney General in twenty eighteen, re elected in twenty twenty two. Prior to that, she was the New York City Public Advocate for four years and a New York City City Council member for

eight years prior to that. So one of the reasons she's doing a lot of this political stuff is because she's got a political ambitions for much higher off If she can get Trump, she's going to be a big hero to the Democrats. Prior to elected office, she was a public defender for legal aid.

In other words, Letitia James is a lifelong public servant, but the servant in quotes I think, and other than a mishap in the twenty tens when she neglected to list the Brooklyn brownstone that she owns and rents out on her financial disclosure forms, she hasn't had any public scandals. But with that being said, I'm not quite sure what I was expecting to find, but

I do know I wasn't expecting what I did find. So the first thing you noticed when you download and sort the expenditures of any politician running for reelection in a safe seat is how they use their campaign funds to supplement their lifestyles to a degree that Middle America could never dream of. What do I mean? Well, in twenty twenty three alone, James spent over twenty eight five hundred dollars on hotels, over fifteen thousand of that was spent on luxury hotels

in Puerto Rico. And then she has spent over eighty four thousand dollars on airfare to fly herself all over the country because she rents private jets, and she's built her campaign over twenty thousand dollars a year for meals, and no,

these are not large catering events. These are luxury meals. There's receipts for everything from eighteen dollars at Dunkin Donuts to one hundred and sixty five dollars at an oyster bar in Massachusetts, or then seven hundred dollars seven hundred dollars meal at a steakhouse in Brooklyn. I've never had a seven hundred dollar meal. They must be really big. It's bigger than an all of you can

stand buffet at one of these chief restaurants. And then there's thousands of dollars spent on ubers and lifts, tens of thousand dollars, of thousands of dollars spent on office at everywhere from Target to BJ's Hooseel. Over seven thousand dollars dropped at a nightclub in New York City and billed as an office sixpence an office expense at a nightclub, multiple stays at the Beverly Hills, Wilshire.

Sixty five thousand dollars in reimbursements to campaign consultants, which could literally be anything. Can anyone tell me why a state attorney general would need to spend over three hundred thousand dollars in a single year on campaign consultants when they just won an election the previous November. What could they possibly be consulting on. Well,

maybe it's a next office up that she wants to go for. But considering the high bar that she set for Trump in his civil fraud case, as I joked about that, they said, well, we cannot tolerate any kind of inappropriate behavior. Right, Yes, nobody was harmed by this, but there were exaggerations made on his financial statements. We can't tolerate that.

And said, what a joke. Yeah, to try to pretend they've got such a high standard in New York City, considering the fact they set this high standard, that she plays so fast and loose with what she deems to be quote legitimate campaign expenses. Three hundred and thirty five dollars at Nathan's lux lifestyle on Martha's vineyard last August fifty one two dollars dropped at the forty eight Lounge in New York City last September under again the Expense Code Office. So

you might be wondering where does all this money come from? Well, it seems that she's got ghost donor bots when you start to look at her contributors and it gets more and more interesting. But this is the type of thing that we see from politicians all the time, and there is who need to look at what is happening in New York in California, the way these people are owned not just by the military industrial complex, but by these other interests,

in these other global interests. New York again suing a major beef producer over environmental impact of products. This is Attorney General Letitia James again, who is now trying to shut down beef production out of New York. The first program I did when I had my own program at info Wars was to interview somebody in California who was trying to secede because they didn't like Trump, And

I said, what can we do to help you go? I just wearsed the people in California and New York these politicians would just go and leave us alone, leave us with our cars, leave us with our food supply. But these corrupt politicians don't want to do that. Well, we're running out of time. Let me thank people very quickly and thank Tony. Thank you so much for helping us, Tony and matching this grim reaper. Thank you for the tip. Hi, David listen on Odyssey went to rumble just to

give a donation. Thank you, Busy b Thank you very much. Okay, I win the prize for the lowest donation, sent a dollar in flowers sewer. Thank you very much much. Thank you win the prize for the highest donation. Thank you, David. You're worth your weight in gold. But this will have to suffice. Thank you so much. And finally, oh no, this is the highest one. Wow. Thank you very much, Apple Eat. That is very kind. I really do appreciate that.

Thank you mister Knight and family, and to mister Ardaman for matching well. Thank you. That is incredibly genuine generous, and thank you all for your generosity. May you have a good day today. Thank you very much. Let me tell you the David Night Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else.

You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.