Mon Episode #2154: The EU’s War on American Free Speech

Lewis and Tolkien, their friendship, their working relationship. They're times that were parallel to ours, you know, morality and heroes, the types of things that are missing from Pete's Pentagon. And yet the amazing cheerleading of these anti Christian, anti Western value conservatives through out there cheering this what are

they trying to conserve? They're going to destroy, have destroyed foundations of our society and me tooism, this idea that because somebody else did it, because somebody else is a hypocrite, now you can commit those same crimes. We're going to take that on, stay with us, will be right back. We also have another layer of the pharmaceutical onion poison that's been pulled back. There's many, many, many more. We're still just on the surface, but something to celebrate, and

we'll talk about that coming up. And there's more chatter from Trump about not being happy with NATO. Don't believe for a minute that he's going to get out of it. He's criticizing Europe, but NATO is a These guys are trying to be the tail that wags the dog. However, but we'll get into that as well. But let's begin with the censorship. Now, the French government has a plan.

They've all got a plan to censor people, but they don't like they're going to label news outlets and this is backfiring on him in terms of popularity in the country. But does it matter at this point? I mean, who likes Macron, who likes Starmer, who likes Trump? Well, there's some people in the US that do like Trump, and they're making all kinds of apologies for him, but these other guys have less of a tribal following. Macron announced

a new media labeling system a few weeks ago. These assurances that he's told people that we're only going to label it, it's not going to be any sort of state backed labeling. Well, you've got a lot of news organizations pointing out that that is not true. And by the way, this is what Candice Owens should be focusing on, rather than trying to invite attention, which is really what she's doing. She's getting attention now, she's getting a lawsuit now over ridiculous claims, just like Alex Jones.

of dollars for each ad that she reads. And it's not that much different for Alex by the way, he'd laid it into me one day because I just mentioned something about somebody's business, and you know, they had done something in the news. I don't even remember who it was or what it was specifically about, but I just remembered who it was and I gave them credit. And he says, you know, that's like ten thousand dollars you just gave that person. That's what I charged for that

kind of stuff. And it was like, I had no idea, you're getting confiscatory phase, Like maybe should pass on that on, you know, But anyway, it's amazing, but they get in. They were saying that for conservatives, they find that they have a more loyal following and they will buy the products and more likely to buy the products. And they are for the left wing podcasters, so they're getting paid quite a bit more than the left wing podcasters. Besides the fact they have a larger audience.

Why because the first casualty of war is the free press, and they are at war with us in many, many different areas. These assurances have only stoked fears of an authoritarian creep into the media sphere. And the authoritarian creep

is named to Minuel Macron. It's like the Nixon and the committee to re elect the President was called creep fittically so so in November, he had told a press organization that a labeling process carried out by professionals was in the works to highlight the media outlets to respect certain ethical standards and thus also those that are deemed to lack ethical standards. So one journal that was owned by a conservative organization said, this is just a project

for information control. That's the same type of excuse that we have seen in the US as well. The difference is now that when this all be going back to twenty eighteen, when we look at it, it was being done covertly. They were not doing it out in the open. It was kind of a secret Cold War where they were attacking people, but they did not agree. That continued for the most part throughout the COVID stuff. Now they're

coming out and doing it openly. That's what's changing. The tyrants have been emboldened by the fact they've gotten away with this stuff, so now they're doing it openly. And the DSA has had their first massive fine applied to Elon Musk personally as well as to Twitter, and he had some choice words for them, which we will get into, and he was absolutely right. Look, I don't think that he is an altruistic billionaire by any means. I think he bought Twitter because this is a guy who was

the king of chronicapitalism. He he has made his money through government, through government connections, through political means, and for the same reason that Jeff Bezos bought the Washington Post for pittance tends of I think it's two h and fifty million dollars or something paid for, which is nothing compared to Twitter. But it also doesn't have the kind of impact that Twitter does, but these guys get those

papers because of those reasons. Jeff Bezos wanted to be in wanted to own the Washington Post because it's in Washington, d c. And it has a lot of influence in terms of politics. And Musk is playing the same game, but in a different way. He is moving to the rank and file people out there in terms of trying to get political advantage. And so I understand what his

motives are. Nevertheless, in his political motives might align him, might align him with the right thing in this particular case, it does you know if he wants to be a populist technocrat.

obscure label. It is to guarantee freedom of the press and freedom of expression and so you know, we had the same thing where they went to some pet project areas and said, well, you're going to tell us what is true what is not true for social media for other things. We'll use you to vet information. If you say that somebody had faults, will take them down. If you go back and look at the Coalition for Content Providence and Authentication, the CCPA, I say, the Chinese Communist

Party of Americas, Well we could also call it. That was the thing that's put together with Microsoft. It's a keep partner working with the government, so you could get hardware and software. They get the apps that you use to create information, whether it is a document, a meme, a video, or audio. They're going to then work with their trusted advisors in the media and they will decide whether you are somebody that they want to be allowed

to speak. And if they put you on the blacklist, then they can stop your stuff before you can ever create it or upload it. They can mark you. That's what the providence means, So they would authenticate who you are and then they would say, well, because that is coming from this person we don't like, then it's not going to be posted. So they stop you even before it gets uploaded, and all of those are still in

the works here in America as well. So another they're they're saying that they've got to stop disinformation and that they're fighting disinformation, and they will decide what disinformation is. Of course, So I've now launched in retaliation, They've launched a petition entitled media, Yes to Freedom, No to Labeling. It's garnered forty thousand signatures. I don't see that as a good thing, you know, the old expression, can fifty

thousand Frenchmen be wrong? Yes, they can also be apathetic when they are being marched into the Gulag, which I think is what's happening here across Europe. It's not just the EU, it's the individual countries, and it's the UK, which is not in the EU. So it is struck back at the EU tyrants. After this something like one hundred and forty million dollar fine. But that's just the beginning. They'll keep adding to it, and they're going to add

other companies to it as well. X is the first, but they will come after all the other social media companies to get them to toe the line. He calls them the fourth Reich, and he's not wrong. He's not taking the outrageous fine lying down. He says that they have Nazi characteristics oppressing their own citizens' best interests. The tyrannical, unelected bureaucracy oppressing the people of Europe are in the second picture. Puts up a picture of this is Europe,

this is EU. In other words, it's non existent. Musk also re shared a post about an Irish teacher, Enick Burke, who was jailed for refusing to use transgender pronouns and later reply to another user, so many politicians in Europe are traders to their own people. All true, All true must highlid the fact that Meta was a verification program similar to Exis. Yet the EU has onerously fined the

more censorship prone Meta. They haven't, I should say, he said, I didn't do the Twitter purchase because I thought it was a great way to make money. I knew that bazillion slings and arrows coming in my direction. It really felt like there was a civilizational danger that unless one of the major online platforms broke ranks, and then because they're all just behaving in lockstep with the legacy media said literally, there was no place to actually get the truth.

It was almost impossible, So everything was just getting censored. The power of censorship apparatus was incredible. And again I don't think that he did this for altruism. I think he did it for political advantage. But the political would be to do the thing that everybody wants. Everybody wants free speech. We're not on board with these leaders, not in the EU, not in the UK, not in France,

not in the US either. He confirmed that another user's report that ex terminated the EU Commission's advertising account, so basically shut them down, and shut down the EU commissions one account.

the time of the Wild West is over. I grew up liking the Wild West, and I like freedom, threatening sanctions if Twitter didn't comply with the DSA rules. She complated illegal content with anything that the elites deem to be offensive, which at the stage for what is happening now.

And then, of course, I've shown many times when EU Commissioner Theory Breton, I call him conspiracy Theory, fired off a letter to X and of course he went to Austin and I said, we'll see what happens with Musk because Musk kind of bowed and scraped company said, well, we've got the DSA thing that's out there. You're going to comply with that? Oh, yes, yes, yes, I will. Well, I'm glad that he's not doing it. I just don't know if he will keep doing it. Will he stick

to his guns here? So theory Britain fired off a letter demanding that X address back in October of twenty twenty three illegal content and disinformation relating to the Gaza conflict, there again on the side of the Israeli Musk fired back, demanding a specific list of violations so the public could judge for themselves. Breton's vague accusations, citing repurposed images and unverified claims, highlighted the EU's preference for opacity of accountability.

List the violations you allude to on X so the public can see them, said Musk. The EU's response was not forthcoming, but they continued to threaten further. Musk brings receipts showing that EU sent him a formal letter demanding that he censor Donald Trump during the twenty twenty four US presidential election, and he's posted the letter on X so I thought he can see it. So this find

does not exist in a vacuum. It's part of a chilling pattern of overreach and it's going to threaten privacy and free speech across the continent and the world.

I'm saying because they don't like what you're saying about climate, or what they don't like what you're saying about the COVID situation, or about their particular war that they want to push. These are all things that are coming. By the way, I mentioned the climate mcguffin. We have on third Hour today we have Alex Newman is going to be joining us as a New American. We talked to

Alex frequently about homeschooling. He's at the forefront of advocating for homeschooling and freedom and education, but he also does follow the climate mcuffin. He goes to these cop meetings that happen everywhere, and he just got back from the one that was just held there. So we're going to get his update, get the temperature as to how these people are dealing with their setbacks in this area. Because they have had some setbacks, that's good news. We'll be

talking to him in the third hour. Take the proposed Chat Control law, which would mandate backdoors into encrypted messages on apps like WhatsApp and Signal. Sold as a child protection measure, it would scanned billions of private conversations, exposing them to hacking, to fraud, and to government spying. The heart of it all is the e use obsession with

controlling the flow of information. Remember if we go back to January twenty twenty four speech of we have the it was I'm trying to find it here which video the Bond film film of here we go, Tavos, this is Ursula vonder Lean or as I call her, Ursula fond of Lyne.

over garbage. She said, Well, he said that earlier in February. He kicked off by going to the Munich Security Conference and tearing into them about censorship. We'll see what happens with this. No voter on this continent, he said, went to the ballot boxed open the floodgates to millions of unvetted immigrants, and he declared labeling Europeans as more interchangeable cogs in a global economy. The German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius is name Rimes called Vance's opinions unacceptable, but he

proved Vance's point about normalizing authoritarianism. Yeah, it was one hundred and forty million dollars. Here it is one hundred and forty million dollars. Hit on X is not just a fine, it's a declaration of war against free speech globally. Jonathan Turley said this is his first time under the DSA, that the EU officials acknowledged that it will lay the foundation for additional penalties to come to force companies to comply with EU quote unquote values on free speech. They

don't have values on free speech. They have values they value censorship and control. X has sixty days to develop solutions to address the issues, ninety days to implement the changes, or it may face additional fines. And you know when I look at has been proposed by one person up in New Hampshire calls it the Granite Act, but he actually came together. We'll put together an acronym to oppose

censorship in it to use to come up with a name. Granted, but I'm sure you could probably get AI to do that stuff for you pretty easily.

that says you can't pay him that much. It's like, what gives you the legal authority to decide that? And anyway, because of that, they relocated the company to Texas and incorporated in Texas. And wouldn't it be interesting if Texas were to do this for Elon Musk basically was being proposed by this libertarian in New Hampshire and the Granite

Act to say, well, what's your collection mechanism. Okay, you're going to have to have Our banking system is going to have to be used to try to grab this money from them, and we're not going to recognize this without a trial in court. Good luck with that. The DSA the EU can impose fines of up to six percent line Platform's annual global revenue if they fail to censor for them. This is just the first salvo in a war that some have warned is coming, and we

cannot be passive at this moment. Americans who will find themselves subject to European censors, and I say that they will probably do this directly eventually. I wouldn't be surprised if the EU and the UK are going around and arresting people in the middle of the night because they posted something they find offensive. What do you think they might do to me? In terms of lawfair? I can imagine I would see that coming, you know, And how do you fight that kind of lawfair against a country

that is coming at you. So Musk has called for the abolition of the EU, which we could all sympathize with. You argue that the EU bureaucracy is slowly smothering europe to death. It has, and it is a smother effect all government regulation and all governments do this. I mean, you look at what our government has done in terms of smothering home ownership or car ownership or the rest of these things. Has it done. It's done by continually piling on more and more regulations. And they're very much

like a book constrictor. They just keep tightening it until they.

she called him thing. And so it was like the belly dancers and some costume characters and the woman with a giant book and stricter wrapped around her would go that alternate with us.

Nazi salutes there. Well, it's also no war there is yet, because you don't have people like this Polish Foreign minister also pushing for war in Europe.

enforce your own ideology on top of them. You're like, no, you can't think that. You can't say that.

a dark time that we're going into. I mean, this is not just the rise of Nazis and Germany. This is the rise of that kind of authoritarianism across the board and all the countries that used to be Western civilization. They have now thoroughly rejected the values of Western civilization. That's what this article is about. From naked capitalism. They So we first asked this question, just how dystopian coul Starmer's Britain become. We asked that about a year ago.

At that point in time, with the government just four months in office, all we could offer as an answer was, well, how long is a piece of string? Now, thirteen months later, it's clear that the said string is very long, indeed in getting longer by the day. On his election July twenty twenty four, Starmer promised his government would tread let's say, does that means stomp more likely on the lives of voters, one of the growing multitude of pledges that Starmer has

broken during his seventeen months in office. In this particular case, it took just two months for Starmer to change course, telling delegates at the twenty twenty four Labor Party Conference that the state would in fact take greater control over people's lives. Plans run veiled to, among other things, launch non mandatory digital identity, which will become mandatory, of course,

to expand the use of live facial recognition technology. By the way, you know, we talk about mandatory digital ID, mandatory ID, sof remember real ID was said, oh, it'll never be mandatory, and yet they haven't made it mandatory. What they have done is they said, we'll give you forty five dollars fine if you don't have it. That's

the way it works here. So facial recognition technology resurrect an old Tory policy to grand inspectors of the Department of War Conpensions, increased power to snoop on claimants bank accounts, and to intensify the British state's crackdown on lawful speech. Especially that was just for starters. For the main course, the government is now setting its sights on trial by jury.

Think about this, folks. This is one of the seminal foundation blocks really of Western civilization and our individual liberties is trial by jury. So much so Gilbert Sulvan even did a little opera about it.

Same thing is true in the UK. But now they want to formalize that. They've announced plans to limit people's right to trial by jury in England and Wales. A tier of swift courts, they call it, will be created to replace jury trials for most offensives that carry a likely jail sentence of less than three years, as well as complex fraud and financial cases. Well, here we have death by a thousand cuts. You know, you have your

traffic court, your tax court. Don't forget the FISA court where they can put you on a no fly list without you even knowing that you've been charged. That is more like a star chamber. And you know when it comes to traffic court at least I don't know if it is in Tennessee, but in Texas they had in their right to trial by jury, and you could use

that if you're in Texas. That is a tremendous lever against the prosecutor to do a plea bargain with you, because they want to avoid jury trials by all means, they really do hate jury trials. So only the most serious offenses murder, manslaughter and rape would continue to be heard by a jury of one's peers unless the people want to plea bargain out of it. There, I guess like they have there, despite the fact that English common law draws on the ancient right of trial by jury

rooted in the Magna Carta. They said, we must you had one of the guys. They're saying, we must never forget that Magna Carta employs us not to deny or to delay justice, so we can't delay justice. So what we'll do is will delay the jury trial aspect of Magneicarta, who were complying with Magne Carter.

That's why we look at the Law of Moses. It was so much better God's law anyway, and there would be compensation that would be given to the people who had been injured. The origins go back to Magna Carta in twelve fifteen, which promised that no one would lose their liberty or property without lawful judgment of his peers

and the law of the land. Purpose of this and the reason they talked about peers, it was the peers who put this on the king forced him to sign it, because that was a pushback against an authoritarian, detalitarian king, a monarch, which is what all these people aspire to be.

to the line of research. One of the best books on that was by Joe Sobran and it was Let's see what was it called Shakespeare?

social background. Obviously, the person who wrote these things had a great deal of experience in court intrigue and other things like that, and all these different life experiences that were in Edward de Vere's life. You'll see elements of them in the plays that he wrote, and they explained very clearly why he would not want to own to it, why he could not own to it. But at one point in time he started to organize a coup against

the King James forces. And one of the things that he did was the movie Richard the Third, movie the play I think always think in terms of movies Richard the Third, of course, you know, humpbacked, and everybody agreed that he was an evil figure. The reason he made him a humpback was because he wanted to villainize this one guy who was on the other side of this political intrigue, and everybody knew that it was targeted towards them.

But anyway, so we have a lot of twisted humpbacks. Now, yes, yeah, that guy was hump back.

here where they blackmail you into a plea bargain. And again, even if they don't do that, part of the problem with the jury system here in the US is just like jerrymandering, where they pick the voters, they pick the jurors, and they can manipulate it that way. I guess we'd call that jurymandering.

on government power. Exactly why they made King John sign the Magnet Carter requesting the crits that trial by jury is a check on the King's total power. The renowned English jurist, justice andry politician William Blackstone, which everybody refers to, wrote the following about trial by jury and the commentaries

and the laws of England. He said, trial by jury ever has been, and I trust ever will be looked upon as the glory of the English law, so that the liberties of England cannot but subsist so long as this palladium remains sacred and inviolate, not only from all open attacks, which none will so heartily make, but also from secret machinai which may sap and undermine it, introducing new and arbitrary methods of trial, which is what they're

doing again. The people who run our countries we are talking about the US or the UK or the EU, they're all death by thousand cuts. I mean, they're infringing on these basic foundations of Western civilization, and in many cases they've gotten so bold as to just wipe them out the full stroke.

to survive. And then for about two hundred years, the West has been able to sit around and think like, what is titled to a man? What should we focus on? What should he be you know, I gues said, entitled to what can the government not do to him? Most other countries never cared about that. They were never interested in discussing that or giving you know, the individual citizens anything.

And we've had for two hundred years, basically in Europe and America, this Golden Age, and we're just throwing it away and so many people just do not care.

Starmer himself, it's set in nineteen ninety two. The right to trial by jury is an important factor and the delicate balance between the power of the state and the power of the individual's pocracy. Folks, that is true, and he knows that's true, and that's why he's doing this because he wants to empower himself and take power away from you. It is a zero sum game.

greater the imbalance. That lawyer is our current prime minister. He wrote that in nineteen ninety two. It is true then, as it is true today. How can the Chancellor stand up and propose a limitation of the rights to try by jury when he knows perfectly well the category of defendant who will suffer the ill effects of it?

It's absolutely thoroughly disgusting to see what's happening with that. Again, these principles of what a just war is those were jettison. The idea of following the constitution. That was jettison with the drug war, the just war theory and not attacking civilians. We got rid of that during World War Two. So this is a logical conclusion where we are with this. Steve James writing about this, and one of the real targets of the proposed legislation is something called jury equity

or jury nullification. That's right, that's what they really gets them upset. This refers to the right of a jury to determine whether their crime has been committed at all, regardless of the opinion of the trial judge. Well, no, that's not actually true. It is you can acknowledge the fact that it is a violation of the law. The nullification is really to judge the law and not just the facts of the case. The whole point of it.

So you know, you look at the similar case in that I've talked about many times, the ordeal of Edwin Bushnell, who was the foreman of a jury that was setting in judgment of William Penn, who deliberately and openly violated the laws in the UK saying that you will only go to the official Church of England. They were Quakers, so they continued to meet in their Quaker church. They locked the doors of the Quaker church and said, well, that's fine, we'll just meet on the steps. So then

they arrested him for that. When he was brought up for charges, the jury decided that they didn't like the law, saying that you had no right of conscience, and so they found him not guilty. The judge was furious and through the foreman and the number two person on the

jury and to jail themselves. And they were there for a month or so, and finally their lawyer came back and said, what does this say in the law that you can't nullify these laws with the jury, that the jury has to follow the law, And that was habeas corpus, And so the judge didn't have any law that was just his own personal peeve, and so that case established the idea of habeas corpus as well as dury nullification.

He says, very equity was famously exercised in nineteen eighty five by the jury and the case against civil servant who leaked details of the then Tory government's misinformation over the circumstances surrounding the nineteen eighty two sinking of the Argentine cruiser General Belgrano by the Royal Navy with a loss of two hundred and seventy two liners. I remember that very well, but you heard about that all the time. The General Belgrano was a ship that Argentina had in

the Falkland Wars, and it was ancient. I mean, it was World War two or older. And they took it out with a couple of missiles. You know, that was like their entire navy ship.

it's not just a second strike. It was reprehensible from the very first missile, not just that they circled back and killed the survivors who were shipwrecked. The principle has become an irritant to governments ever since, particularly following a series of cases in which members of climate and anti genocide protest organizations such as Extinction Rebellion and Palestine Action have been acquitted despite instructions from the Bench.

the most authoritarian senators we've ever had. I said that about him when he was running for president. I said, watch out. You know, this guy is unbelievably evil. I said it when he ran the first time as well.

Not only was he plagiarists and couldn't think. I mean, he wasn't such a bright bulb even before he had old age dementia, but he was guilty of plagiarism, and he was also one of the most authoritarian people out there, and so they're now using now the Conservatives who were haranguing Biden for the mandates about the Trump shots, Oh

look at how authoritarian he is. Now they're going back and saying, well, look, he said that we needed to execute people if they were drug dealers, and so we should be doing it because the other sides already embrace this. I am so disgusted with this whole idea that because the other tribe engaged in criminal activity, because the other tribe are hypocrites, therefore that gives you a free pass to be hypocrites yourself and to engage in criminal action yourself.

But that's what we're seeing from all these influencers who are trying to tell you that there's a coup against Pete Hegseth. If only there were, I wish there were a coup against him. We need to get people like him out of the Pentagon. Oath breaker, that's what he is. Anyway. One of the things that is going to apply to is financial crime and fraud cases. Those that involve hidden dishonesty or complexity outside the understanding of the general public

will also be exempt from trial. By jury if the proposed bill is and acted deeply troubling because this is not getting much attention at all on the media. They're just focusing on violent crime. So that's time.

he's got some stiff competition. He's a compulsive liar, he's drunk on power, and he's a sanctimonious hypocrite. I got to say I could say that about pretty much most of the presidents in my lifetime. The difference is how open they are about it, and I think Trump has been the most open about being a compulsive liar, drunk on power and a sanctimonious hypocrite. But they are laying the foundations of authoritarian states everywhere, and freedom of speech

is one of the key things. That is the thing that is primarily under at tech in the UK, in France, Germany, the EU and guneral. There is one example. The former UK ambasstor Craig Murray put a blog and he said the terrifying case of Natalie Strecker. She was charged with

eliciting support for Hamas and Hesbela. Why because eight tweets cherry picked by the police and prosecutors from around fifty one thousand tweets and they found eight out of fifty one thousand that she complained about what was happening in Gaza, So that makes her a terrorist? Does that sound like the labels being thrown around at these Narco terrorists? So we can do whatever we want to, right, I mean in the UK they're only locking people up. We fire

missiles at people if we call them a terrorist. Now, So Judge John Saunders interrupted the prosecution and her child asked whether they were saying that he would be guilty of support for terrorism if in a lecture he told an international law class that Palestinians have the right to armed resistance according to international law. And so the prosecution said, yes, there would be an offense for you to tell law students that you can't quote the law to them. You know,

we've seen this type of thing before. A New Jersey weed man who decided, you know, he was very heavy marijuana users. As a matter of fact, when I interviewed him, he started he lit up a joint. I was interviewing him. But he said based on the quantity of marijuana that they had. They automatically started referring to him as a dealer. He goes, I'm not a dealer. I use it all.

But he had enough brain cells left that he realized that there were enough people out there who didn't like the marijuana law that if he made the argument about Durdy nullification, that he would be likely to get off. Says his first trial. He and it's actually in the state constitution of New Jersey that you have a right to judge not only the facts of the case, but also judge whether or not you agree with the law and whether or not you agree with the penalties that

are going to be applied. For instance, you know, if Joe Biden and Richard Nixon have decided that they're going to send you to jail for ten years for mandatory minimum for possession of plot or something like that, a lot of people might think that that is excessive, so they might just nullify that. And so he put that up and started to talk about it. The judge had take that down, or I'm going to come after you for contempt of court and you're going to go straight

to jail. And so he took it down. But it was too late. They had already seen it, and so he had seven of the twelve jurors vote to quit him. And so then they decided they would come after him a second time. When they came after him, the prosecutors came after him a second time, because they can do it three times. When they came after him a second time, the judge allowed him to keep it up because it is after all a part of the state constitution, and

that's what they're saying here. You can't tell you, judge, could not tell your law students about the international law that says that the postings have right to armed resistance, and we would send you to jail. And so that judge left it there. He got acquitted twelve to nothing, which meant that they could not come after him anymore for that.

pass through a man's pelvic area. The bones are closer together in a man's pelvic area. So that's you know, that's basically what he's saying, and it is true.

I mean, they've already got cameras everywhere. Now what they're going to be able to do is wed that to artificial intelligence and next thing you know, they'll be wedding that to their robot armies of cops who are going to come and arrest you based on how it has flagged you for a particular thing. Well, I said earlier. This is from Preston Burn and you'll find it on zero Hedge. The Granite Act how Congress could strike back

against foreign sensors. Please find below the draft text of the Granite Act, a bill I've offered to New Hampshire legislators for consideration for enactment in that state. It could serve as a template for the US fight back against global censorship if adapted for federal use. The gist is simple.

The only real defense a foreign censor has from injunctive relief in the US court, as we saw with Offcom's recent fine letter to four Chan and the strategy employed by Trump media and technology groups attorneys in their case against Alexander de Morey in the Middle District of Florida, the only strategy to have his sovereign immunity. Foreign countries can bully American citizens and companies because they know that US law potentially protects them from consequences for doing so.

And so you know, basically, I think what he is. The gist of what he's doing. If I get condense it is to say that it's.

very simple cost benefit exercise for these countries. You can try to censor an American citizen or a corporation, but if you do, they can sue you, and you and mister foreign censor are not judgment proof because your country needs access the financial system to survive. Well, the other thing you could do is you could come at it from the law fair perspective, and this could all be done. I don't think it has to be done at the federal level. I mean you could do this at the

state level. And he said.

speech on social media they don't like. When you look at how nitpicking and trivial they are to their own citizens, you can imagine that if it is something of consequence that you were talking about, their war policy, their pandemic policy, vaccine policy, whatever it is, that, their climate policy, whatever it is that they're pushing, if they think it is consequential, even their transgender policy, because remember they're doing that, they're

the ones who are pushing that. But they would come against anyone who is making comments or writing articles or doing podcasts in America that conflict with their interests. I think it's just a matter of time before that happens. Let's take a quick break here.

She has gone completely insane. The French are apparently sending assassins after her. But she was at Dollywood over a weekend or two ago over Thanksgiving. Yeah, she was out in Dollywood having a great time. I guess the French assassins aren't too good at their job. I don't know.

timing is all the same. But don't call it a conspiracy.

very beginning. And a lot of the kings that come across as villains were their political rivals as well, So just keeps going on and on and on when to look at all different aspects.

never had to mention jury not nullification. I just told the court that I didn't think that anyone should be arrested for having marijuana, and they let me go and have never called me back since. Hell on, guys, he believes in freedom, Get him out of here. He's got to go. Guard Goldsmith. By the way, the state Senator Keith Ammon here in New Hampshire proposed the Granite Act is a free State project member.

Hollywood was as scrupt as could be from the very beginning, and so they had a lot of nudity and sex in the early silent film days and so they were going to shut the whole thing down, and so Hollywood kind of did its own policing thing. A similar thing happened with comic books. They came up with the comic book code and everything, so they had different codes that

were there. And in this particular case, what was relevant about it was that they had said that it wasn't just about sexual things or nudity.

kind of a backdoor slap at that. But anyway, that's just my opinion. Poor Pete. The war on Pete hegsath and this is something that was done by a guy who operates under an alias who writes on American Great and zero Hedge thought it was so good that they published it as well, And I got to say, I think it's one of the most disgusting things. The only thing that I've seen more disgusting take than this is the article I'm going to cover after this.

is no death penalty for it. So when you look at this, we were just talking about getting rid the foundations of Western society, free speech, trial by jury, the Magna cart, all these things being purged. These people in America, this American greatness and zero hedge. These people, they are pushing this something that is far more dangerous now, that is getting rid of the idea of a just war. They have nothing but contempt for that and for the rules of war. And let me tell you, yeah, it

may sound like an oxymoron. But if ever there was a place we need to have rules to try to mitigate the slaughter that's in war, and we abandon all that to our demise. Really, newsflash. They admitted all this stuff, folks after boasting about striking the ship. And that's the key thing in Reason got it right about this.

I don't know what's the matter with people like this during this but the damage has done, and too many Americans are still clinging to the lies on the Washington Post heg Seth, Levitt Trump, all of them have changed their tune. All of them have changed their tune. They've all walked back their statements which means that they were all lying and it's just become the lies have become untenable. That's why they change the story. Just like Hillary Clinton, I'm Benghazi.

by Smedley Butler. War is a racket really is, and you know we still use that word rico, the racketeering and influence and corrupt organizations. It's organized crime, and the entire drug war is organized crime run by organized criminals that we call the federal government. And this only exacerbates all this. So this one is from the Daily Signal. I believe it's a Heritage Foundation daily wire. I think is Ben Shapiro saying Daily Signals Heritage Foundation. These are

people who are cheering, hegseeth. Matter of fact, three cheers for the Pentagon's two step boat attack. They said, all week long, I've tried to cry for the narco terrorists. See this is the childish labels that they throw on people, just like the leftists do. Oh, we'll call them narco terrorists. Now I gotta because I label you a narco terrorist. Now I have a right to jail you, to gas you at a protest or whatever. I'm going to label

your organization in a terrorist organization. That's why people showed up on the No King's Day and said, I am antifah if you're going to just arbitrary label them as this, we don't like that principle. But they use that label and now they can kill you if they wish. So it's however, I tried to cry for them, but my

eyes are stayed totally cry. Yeah, well, maybe you ought to weep for the loss of due process, the loss of the constitution, the loss of the rule of law and the loss of morality in our society because people like you at the Daily Signal have pushed this. The only thing wrong with Venezuela and two step is the Secretary of War Pete Hesse did not hold a press conference and take full credit for this operation. A newsflash. It's not the Secretary of War. That's going to cost

two billion dollars if they do it. But they haven't done it yet. He calls himself that it's just an affectation. He's like a little I think Kelly got it right. He's like a little boy playing war. I probably could go into his office.

not Venezuelan sailors. They are private sector criminals, namely drug cartel thugs, for which I would add no death penalty law, and there is no declaration of war to identify them as combatants. There was no conflict, there was no combat, and so from the very beginning, this is equivalent to killing civilians. You know, we just had a video that I haven't shown it on the show, but it was taken by somebody as from a distance as Israeli soldiers.

We're arresting someone in Gaza. The person's got their hand up and the Israeli soldiers just executed them. That's what this is about. And it's no wonder that we support Israel in that war, because we do the same thing.

are non combatants. That means civilians, and that means even soldiers who are now out of combat, sailors who are shipwrecked. This is the exact case that they use. So you don't get your human rights because you sign a Geneva convention. Again, I find it very troubling that the Heritage Foundation would publish something like this. But the Heritage Foundation never really got the gist of what was happening with social media censorship either, and by the way, neither did the Cato Institute.

The biggest concern did, the biggest libertarian think tanks did not support free speech against censorship when it's being done surreptitiously. They came back and said, well, this is being done by the social media companies and their private entities, so they can do whatever they want to take somebody's free speech. No they can't, No, they can't, And I don't care if the Supreme Court says it or not. Those were not rights that were given to me by the government.

Their rights that are given to me by God, and the corporations cannot take those rights. Ever, we can never give them that kind of power, just like we can't give it to the government either. If the US armed forces are no longer may kill narco terrists who survive single tap strikes, then these individuals suddenly have grown a right to life that must be respected. Think about this conservative think tank talking about how somebody has grown a

right to life. Anyone wonder that we struggled for so long to stop abortion that the right to life people couldn't get the kind of traction that they needed from Heritage Foundation. Welcome to post Christian conservatism, where you supposedly grow rights to life. No, it is not something. These rights, as I said, even about the Bill rights, these rights are not granted by the government. They're not granted by

the document. They're not granted only to citizens. We have these rights because we're human, and that means that people who are citizens of other countries also have human rights and were not allowed to kill them wantonly if they are if it's not in self defense. This is clearly not in defense. It's an unjust war.

they're going to do. They're trying to survive in the ocean. They were also waving for help, by the way, that has also come out. They said, well, they believed that they were potentially in communication with others and that they might then salvage the drugs, so they determined that they were still in the fight with the valid targets. Understand that the way they have defined conflict, right, they have defined conflict mean these people were possession of illegal drugs.

Therefore they were a threat. Therefore there was combat, Therefore it was conflict. None of that is true. It has never been true, and we better hope that it never becomes true. When are they going to start executing people on the streets like du Terte did in the Philippines. There is a simple solution to all this. Those who prefer not to get obliterated in narcotics boats or wind up clutching wreckage after being shot need to not do any drugs.

as the civilized at forfeiture. This is all coming from Joe Biden. Joe Biden, as I've said over and over again, when Clarence Thomas was having the hearings, the Democrats got very angry with him because they wanted him to focus exclude Civilly on this. He said, she said thing about Anita Hill, and instead he focused on attacking Clarence Thomas because Clarence Thomas supported natural rights and the Constitution of the Bill Rights, and Biden hated the thing.

So a clip, Steve Watson found a clip where Joe Biden is demanding the same aggressive action decades ago, proving that their opposition as pure partisan sabotage, as cartel poison floods America unchecked, Steve, they would be so proud of you with our first czar in America, William Bennett and the Reagan administration. They'd be so proud of you towing the line for this. You know, we got to do

whatever it takes for the war on drugs. It was the guy that Steve A. Chennick was working with Tom Clancy, who came up with clear and present danger. They were selling that idea to people a long time ago. Yeah, let's just choose the CIA in the military to kill all these cartel people. That's the way. Let's turn the war on drugs into a real war. You know, it wasn't long ago that conservatives dinged Biden for his anti

human rights, his anti Bill rights mandates. Well, okay, this is poison and we all know it was poisoned that Trump put out and Trump says he's the father of but it was Biden who mandated it, and violation of the Bill rights and violation of our human rights. He mandated it. Now these same conservatives are out there saying, well, Biden did it, so now we can do it. Right, this is the way it's going to operate. No hipocrisy and crimes of the other tribe. Do not excuse the

hypocrisy and the crimes of your tribe. So, in addition to calling for more prisons and more cops. Biden says, the Democrats want the creation of a strike force to do all this stuff. And again, the explosion of prisons that we had because of mandatory minimums and things like that, did that stop drugs? No, you have people who die

of overdoses in these corrupt federal prisons as well. And what is it going to I've said this all along, What does it say if you can't even stop drugs, if people can get enough drugs to overdose on them in prison, what kind of a society are we going to have If you're going to try to stop this spiritual problem by force by police, we'll all be living in a prison. Now that's worth they taking this. They're using this as an excuse to put us all in

a prison. And so the clip from February seventh, nineteen eighty nine Senate hearings on Crime and Drug shows Biden pushing for swift, severe punishment of dealers and international operations to dismantle cartels before they infiltrate the US. This is like arguing that, well, you know, Hitler said that we should do such and such, so let's do it. You know, he's he's he's bought into this, so let's it gives us the permission to do that. I look at Biden

as somebody who as authoritarian as Hitler. He would do all these things to us if he could. This psycho is Trump's designation of cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, a move that Biden never pursued, despite his tough talk. Yeah, it took the left right thing. And they always pull this stuff with a Republican. You know, it was Biden who was pushing all this stuff behind the scenes really hard and in the Senate when Reagan was president. And of course, you know they need to put in Donald

Trump because it can. Conservatives will applaud this stuff because the conservatives, just like the liberals, want government to do whatever they think is important. Conservatives don't like drugs. You shouldn't like drugs, But because they don't like drugs, they will allow the government to do whatever the government tells them.

Will stop the drugs, no matter how disconnected that is from reality, no matter how much it destroys our society, no matter how much it erodes the foundation or destroys the foundation of our country. So he says, one person says, well, that's the Biden. I remember he was pro America back when Dems could be patriots. Now you have to piss all over everything that's rb of Jonesborough. Actually he's I think he's living in Jonestown.

collects tweets about it. It's amazing. Trump is everything that Democrats ever wanted in a single package, and yet they hate him. I agree, I agree. I've said this for the longest time. He is a New York City Democrat. He has a casino owning, organized crime thug, and that's the way he runs the country as well. He is a New York City Democrat. Why do they hate him so much? Well, Stephen Miller said, this is the first time I can ever think where a major political party

has sided with narco trafficking, murdering terrorist scum. Well, Stephen, you need to get a little bit better educated. Both parties have sided with a CIA, which is all of the above, go trafficking, murdering terrorists, scum. That is the job description there at the CIA. And if you think that the major parties haven't sided with this, they've both done it. They've both done it, he added. A Democrat says, Oh, there's no such thing as a narco terrorist. They're just

narco persons. ISIS and these narco terrorists in our hemisphere use the same tactics. We're going to go off running around the Middle East, he says.

that Trump honored him in the Oval office? Seriously, we're supposed to believe that these people have got such short memories. They want to ding Biden for dementia. Maybe they've got dementia, or maybe they're just machiavellian liars, people like Steve Watson as well as Joe Biden and Steven Miller. I'm going to want to get answers on what the pete hegseth order was, said Democrat Senator Warner. And again this is hypocrisy, but it is true. He said, we haven't seen the

whole unedited video. If there's nothing inappropriate here, you could have cleared this up without the admiral coming in. Just show us the video. And again that tells you everything, the fact that they don't want to show the video. And it's a very awkward moment when a Fox reporter pressed Warpeat on all of this. Now, where's the video? You're going to release this video? Oh, this national security issue?

You know knows job security issue for you, pow. And yet when the truth comes out, Oh a Soros who's doing a coup against Tike Seth. Give me a break.

they joined forces with the mas. I'm going to kill them first, which is what that Jewish woman said. We've got to stop in the lawn and just kill them, all right. In addition, ABC's Martha Raddits gave key updates and said the survivors climbed back on the boat. Well, to him, that's admission that they're still dangerous, not that they're trying to survive in the water. They tried climbing up several times, as they point out, and they kept

falling off of the boat. They couldn't get on the boat. Well, I think you're trying to write that boat so that you can bring drugs in the country. So therefore you are still in conflict with us, because again, remember, the possession of the drugs is taken the same as if they were shooting at the US Navy. It's not it's not conflict, it's not a threat, and it wasn't coming to the US either.

Latin America amid scrutiny or the bombing campaign. It happened at exactly the same time as he's going in there on Thursday, and he's answering questions about their premeditated, cold blooded murder of people who are not a threat to them. And again, how many times you have to go through this. You can't shoot somebody in the back, even if they come into your home, if they're running away, if they're not a threat to you, you can't shoot them in

the back. Police are supposed to abide by those same rules. They get away with it too frequently, But the military is definitely not allowed to do that because they have so much more force. They have to be held to a higher standard. The government has to be held on a higher standard than the homeowner. Southcom claimed the strike killed four more quote unquote narco terrorists, a term used to justify attempt to justify the extra judicial executions at sea.

They've got all kinds of catchphrases, a lethal kinetic strike, illicit narcotics, all the rest of this stuff. What I saw in that room is one of the most troubling scenes I've ever seen in my life in public service, said Democrat Jim Hines. You have two individuals in clear distress without any means of locomotion, and a destroyed vessel

who are killed by the United States. Well, again, I would say to him, since we're talking about somebody attaining the right to life, perhaps Jim Hines, who is a Democrat a Connecticut I imagine he has supported over and over again abortion right, and that kind of hypocrisy does not mean that it's still not a crime for Pete

Hegseth to murder people in the water. But again, when you're talking about abortion, you're talking about if you go back and you look at that video of it's called the procedure based on the first hand person account of a guy he was called in to do ultrasound, didn't realize it was for an abortion. He talked about what he saw and they animated that. This is the same thing in principle, folks, same thing in principle. Conservatives are

cheering this. I'm disgusted. I'm not a conservative, not a conservaive. I rechecked that label. Not a conservative, not a Republican. They aren't trying to conserve anything of any value. So again we're going to grow into human rights and grow

into a right to life. The bombing campaign says anti war is clearly illegal under US and international law, but more importantly, it is immoral under a law that is higher than human law, a law that is higher than the law of the land higher than the constitution, God's law, and pete Hegsteth continually takes God's name in vain when he wears his tattoo sleeves. About all his Christian symbols

to him is just gang symbols, it really is. I mean, all the stuff that's there, you know, it's just, oh, there's this cross that represents that, there's this and that it's just a bunch of gang signals symbols that are out there. The threat that's a suposedly justified killing two boat attack survivors was entirely speculative, says Reason. And again, you know, imagine if some Navy seals had gone to rescue them and somehow these guys who are struggling to

survive in the water. Imagine if they then pull out their machine guns that they've kept concealed and start shooting at the seals. Can you imagine if they did that.

enough to transform murder into self defense. While the renewed congressional interest in the legal and moral justifications for Trump's bloodthirsty drug strategy is welcome, the inquiry should not be limited to the question of whether one particular attack violated the law of war. They've all violated it. And I said that from the very first day, they have committed twenty two unwarranted attacks. They have killed eighty seven people.

Don't forget that. Eighty seven murders by Warpete and Trump, and they're owning it now. Bradley's defense nevertheless illustrates the outrageous implications of conflating drug smuggling with violent aggression. We cannot allow them to do this, because, folks, if we do this, there's absolutely nothing to stop Trump from going into the cities and start executing people like Dutte. And remember Trump praised Duterte in the Philippines for doing this

very same thing. So if they're going to say that, if they believe that you're doing drugs, we can just shoot you on the street. We have people getting shot on the street because of the or of the illegal prohibition that's being done. It's a un agenda. So I'll never forget that.

him being on. Get ready, we're going to take a quick break and then we'll be back with Alex Newman.

these cop things. We're now up to number thirty and this time we covered the road that they were building for the elites to go down and cutting down massive numbers of trees. I don't know, what was it, one hundred thousand alex where'd they cut down with those trees?

there was the carbon budget for humanity. It turns out there is a carbon budget that we can be allowed to admit.

So the biggest that's right and prepared to have your CO two emissions rationed slaves, because that's coming down the Pike. They got the infrastructure in there to eventually create the enforcement mechan They went into this with the Marxists would be dictator of Brazil Lula saying that he wanted to create an enforcement body. He was calling it the Global

Environmental Council. They didn't get that, but they got all of the metrics and tools and monitoring frameworks that they'll need to be able to get that going forward.

to this is the religious angle. This conference to me was the place where it was most clear. And I've been going to these for fifteen years watching here an

attempt to repaganize the world. Basically, the paradigm, David is Christianity is to blame for the environmental and ecological catastrophe because Christianity holds that man has made in the image of God, that the planet is here for our benefit, that we are calling Genesis to take dominion of the planet and its animals and things like this for our benefit and for the glory of God. That's the reason

why Mother Earth is suffering so much. And so they paraded, I mean literally an endless parade of Native American pagans,

you know, a lot of them from the rainforests. That's why they held it in the rainforest who came to enlighten all the delegates about how Mother Earth is angry at us for our co two emations, and we need to go back to appeasing the forest spirits and the river spirits and the rock spirits, and we do that by basically repaganizing the world and cleansing it of Christian civilization.

So this was a very, very very significant motif throughout this conference, and I think it's one of the big takeaways.

one and it was everywhere. It was, you know, science magazines that we saw left behind on the train from people.

recanted that. But these people are doubling down and going on with it, and it is a religion and they pursue it religiously. You know, that is the worldview in which they frame everything. You know, I think, Alex, I think what is going on the way it might take on all this. I want to see what you think

about this. I think one of the reasons that they're pulling back on this is because they've got to get the infrastructure in with AI, and they've got to get the infrastructure in with digital money, you know, not CBDC, but they'll be doing it through through stable coins. That'll give them the same kind of control and you know, being able to observe everything that we do and control

and prevent us from making certain transactions. I think they've got to get that infrastructure in and so they're going to wait and do that, and then they will roll in the come back to the population control stuff, and it is population control in every aspect of it, making sure they don't have as many people, but then the people that are there, they want to control every aspect

of our life. What do you think about that? Did you see stuff there about Sea forty, for example, you know the thing that was put together by City, Kahn and Bloomberg. When I saw all the angst about mom Danny, and I thought, well, we've already had a Muslim mayor and a communist in London and New York putting out this prescription for how they're going to ration our lives to us. They call it Sea forty initiative. So I

didn't really see that anything was different about that. But what do you think, what do you think in terms of why they have stepped back away from this climate mcguffin and I think they're going to step back into it once they get these tools in place.

ap Nork Center for Public Affairs. Less than one third of Americans were willing to pay one single solitary US dollar on their monthly electric bill climate change. Okay, that's how little Americans care, even though ones who are dumb enough to fall for this. So their strategy was really clear to me, David. They're working through a variety of institutions, but education is one of the critical ones. UNESCO had a big, big, big event there. They called it Greening Education.

They partnered with the Marxist Brazilian government and the OECD, and they talked about how we are going to brainwash the children in every single country to believe this, and it's not going to be optional. Right, You're going to include it in your nationally determined contributions, your NBCs that you got to update every five years. Under PARIS, they're going to be including what they call climate literacy on the International Standardized Assessments.

back to the religion thing for a moment. The first time I saw the paganism, I was just a young whippers snapper journalists fresh out of journalism school. It was in Cancun. The head of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. In case down, if you get is opened up with a prayer to ex Jail, whom she described as the goddess of tapestries and creativity. So you know

I'm dead serious. She opens up and says, we need a pray to each shell that she'll give us the wisdom and creativity to create a creative tapestry of climate solutions for this crisis whatever.

first getting in this. One of the first things he did was a climate encyclical, and then he got people upset with him because he had that pacamama thing from Amazon. I remember some people then threw it into the river there near the Vatican. But was Poppy Pakemama was that featured in this particular one in Brazil.

ever at a climate center. All these cardinals and bishops and the Secretary of State gave the big opening speech on his behalf and he produced a video and I mean people should watch.

null and void. And it was null and void because you remember it was John Kerry who said, yeah, Obama and I just self ratified at ourselves and so and I say, the Republicans are just as guilty of this as the Democrats are, because I remember had I can't remember his name now. He had somebody that I'd worked with before in terms of climate stuff, and he said, what needs to happen is the Republican Senate needs to come in and say we're going to have a vote

on this presumed treaty. We're going to put it up for a vote. There's no way that it was going to get the sixty percent votes that it needed, so so they needed to do that, and so they could shut it down, but they never did. And the fact that there was never a single Republican that pointed that out, that said this is a bogus, bogus treaty. It is

null and void, it has no effect. And then throughout the entire Trump administration, they pretended that they couldn't get out of it because I think it was deliberately put in saying if you want to get out, you got to wait four years, knowing that that's the term of the American president. So this time they say, well, okay, he got out, and then Biden puts us back in immediately, again violating the idea of treaties. And then when Trump

gets in, now he's going to get out. But since it's the second time he's getting out now, according to the treaty, he only has to wait one year, but we're waiting that year to get out. Have you seen that has a Trump administration ignored these principles. Have they done anything to violate the Climate Agreement or are they still complying with it for this year?

that's where we got the Agenda twenty one. But we got this nineteen ninety two treaty that was called the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, which is very confusing because that's also the name of the bureaucracy that's in charge of implementing the treaty. So every year these climate summits are hosted by the UNF Triple C. It's headquartered in Bond, Germany, And that treaty was, at least according

to the Congressional Record, ratified by the US Senate. I've heard some legitimate questions about the whether the ratification was legitimate. But nineteen ninety two, the US Senate officially ratified this monstrous treaty that George hw Bush, mister New World Order, signed, And so each year they hold these annual climate sumits. This was the thirtieth one, as you pointed out, the

cop thirty. And each year they come up with a new agreement, and each year they like to pretend like they're just going to tack that onto the back of the nineteen ninety two treaty. And so we don't need the Senate to look at this again. It's just part of the.

So here's where we're at now. And I talked to a lot of people in the Trump administration about this, including at State, including at EPA, to try to get

a handle on what's going on. And I'm told by multiple people who are very well informed, people who were very much involved in getting U out of the Paris Agreement the first time, that there are now discussions about the possibility of withdrawing from the UNF Triple C. That would be, as far as I'm concerned, checkmate for the climate cult that LEASA is far as the United States is concerned.

And so frankly, it's fantastic that Trump is not here. You had Gene Sue, a very prominent legal mind on this. Right now she's with the Center for Biological Diversity, but she'll almost certainly work for the next Democrat regime when they get the White House again, says, hey, this is fantastic that the Trump administration didn't send anybody. We're going

to pass a super ambitious agreement. And then the US is still in the unf Triple C. So as soon as Trump is gone and we get the next president in, this will all be binding on the United States and we'll we'll enforce it all on the United States. So that's essentially the situation right now. Trump has his executive order on day one, this was January twentieth, twenty twenty five.

Putting America first in international environmental agreements did get us out of Paris, It did get us out of all of these subsequent agreements that have been tacked onto the back of the nineteen ninety two treaty.

It's mayors, governors, CEOs, And technically they're correct. If you look at their jurisdictions, like the state of California, you add them all together, they do have most of the American population, most American GDP, and they're pretending like we're still in all of these subsequent agreements that we're added on to the back of the unf tripleC.

even know this. But if you go to Article six, where it says that the statutes passed by Congress and the treaties are part of the supreme law of the land along with the Constitution, it says that they need to be made in pursuance thereof. So statutes and treaties that are made in pursuance thereof, in other words, that are made constitutionally. Show me where the Constitution and grants the federal government the power to regulate my co two emissions.

Show them where it grants me them the power to shut down my power plant, create new emission standards for my cars.

discussion or vote on it or whatever. So now we got into this treaty once back in nineteen ninety two, and now we can amend it and extend it, and we can do all these different things that are in violation of the US Constitution, and we never have to go back and relitigate this or reapprove any of these treaties. I reject that, just like I reject the authorization for the use of military force. But the point that you made is that these treaties cannot amend or suspend the

US Constitution, that is the controlling document. The problem is that we've let them get away with this in so many different areas, just like we're talking about the war on drugs and the way this is extended. Honestly, I think alex they called it a war on drugs instead of prohibition because they don't want people to think, well, wait a minute, we had prohibition. There was a constitutional

amendment required for that, the eighteenth Amendment. So they play these games where they just assume these powers and then it's up to you to stop it and to somehow stop it using other lovers of government as they continue to say that they have those powers when they don't really have them. That's the whole fraud behind this. But it really is, it really is about power. It really is about depopulation. I mean, I remember when this whole

thing started. I was in high school when they started had the first Earthday, and I remember it was all about depopulation. And my friends who bought into all this stuff, they were just constantly wringing their hands. There's too many people. There's too many people. There's too many and paul Erlick is out there, how do we get rid of people? Well, wars are good, but disease is even better, you know, And so we need to have all these different ways

that we can kill people. But the governments look at it and although they like to kill people, they like to control the people who are still alive as well. And so I think it really checks all the boxes for the people in power. It gets them exactly what they want. And of course it's checked the boxes where a lot of people have made a lot of money off of this stuff. What does it look like they're lining up to do now? With this some what kind of financial schemes are they rolling out.

One point three trillion in well three distribution per year by the year twenty thirty five, so we're talking ten years from now, they're going to be extracting one point three trillion from whatever's left of the American middle class, if we still have one, whatever's left of the middle

class in Europe. That's in addition to a tripling of climate adaptation finance which is basically bribing third world cleptocracies to pretend like they're adapting to climate change by putting money in their Swiss bank accounts and buying nicer limousines, building themselves nicer mansions and things like this.

carbon market. They're all going to start using the same standards so that they can all be integrated, so that a carbon credit in the European Union is the same as a carbon credit in Brazil is the same as

a carbon credit. Eventually in the United States of America, when they think they can pass this abomination on us and for all people who think this isn't a threat for the next three and a half years while we have Trump in office, I would just remind everybody that there's a lot of people in the administration who have

publicly expressed support for these things in the past. Howard Lutnik, the Commerce Secretary, has actually been deeply involved in creating the infrastructure for the carbon markets.

let's go back to focusing on more important things. The climate change hoax is still the pretext, not a pretext, the pretext for completely restructuring the global economy, completely undermining national sovereignty and transferring power and authority to the UN and bringing all the religions of the world together so that we can save Mother Earth. And nothing has changed about that. They've just stopped talking about it in the fake media in America.

in the CBDC. When you look at people getting very upset about this, it's primarily the power bills and they're going to continue escalating these power bills by leaps and bounds for the purpose of artificial intelligence. And so they're going to have that fight. They're going to build that up as a necessity, and you know, once they get that in, they're going to use that to impose all of these these carbon markets and carbon credits and everything

for individuals. And that's really where this is all headed. It is the perfect I talk about it as being the mcguffin. You know, Hitchcock always had he said, it doesn't really matter what it is that they're chasing. It could be a multie falcon or whatever. They've got a different eject. You know that that's what we're using as our plot device for the for the movie. And so they got these different plot devices and they just keep moving them around, but they always seem to go in

the same direction. You know, we had the COVID mcguffin. It was all about getting some kind of a vaccine ID so they could track you in that time. So we've got to have the infrastructure to be able to track people's movements. We've got to have the digital biometric infrastructure so we can see what they've done and keep

records on people. So they always have this always comes back to the same solution for all these different mcguffins, and they just have a different panic mode that they're trying to put people into.

I mean, you can go back two hundred years. Look at Frederic Bastiat, the great French philosopher lawmaker, said that these totalitarians are constantly concocting the poison and the antidote in.

all the other fights were engaged in. You know, we might as well just raise the white flag because we're going to lose over the long term. We've got to deal.

it with money. And that's why I was absolutely flabbergasted when people didn't get that, about the lockdowns and about the COVID pandemic and everything that everybody would say, it's not Trump, it's the bad democratic governors.

silver lining of the of the school like towns. I still think it's funny to go back and look at people talking about the pandemic and the ill effects of that, and.

particular school, but not in my kids classroom. Well, this time, they could actually see what was happening in the classroom, and that was the big impetus. So the co author, there's someone who's running Classical Conversations. That's an excellent program. We didn't do that when we schooled our kids, but it really is an excellent, rigorous curriculum there it is.

from Ryan for Love of the Road. He's someone who has been a big supporter of this program and we really do appreciate the things that Ryan has done and he is in need of your prayers right now. His family is. Let me just read you what he sent us. He said, my dad is currently in the hospital waiting to undergo open heart surgery this week. He's been complaining about a toothache. Turns out it was a blockage in his arteries. They said he's got triple vessel disease. Thank

god he didn't have end up having a stroke. Apparently was a mini heart attack or whatever it was that you had after yours. The heart attack that's not as life threatening, so they were going to do a heart stint, but some of the blockages are just too much. My mom's doing better after her surgery and she's with him now. They're doing a bunch of tests and might need to move him to Detroit. So always appreciate your prayers, and so please keep Ryan and his family in your prayers.

Prayers for his parents' circumstances, and also prayers for Ryan and his family as they deal with these issues, because it's always a strain on the rest of the family when these things are happening. And I want to pass on another situation. He hasn't well. He has in a way asked for his producer has asked for prayer support. This is Clyde Lewis, and I've been on Clyde Lewis's program about once a month or so before the stroke. It's always a difficult thing for me to do his

program because it's extremely late at night for us. He comes on nighttime on the West Coast, so I'm up to like one o'clock in the morning, and I would wind up getting like two or three hours worth of sleep, and I was dead for most of the rest of the week. It was difficult to do. So Travis contacted him and said that I'm up and I can can

try to do that again. And then his producer said, well, Clyde is in the hospital right now and there is a GoFundMe that's been organized for him and he's looking for He's got a goal of seven thousand dollars and they're about sixty five percent of the way through. So if you need a reminder just how independent from corporate media, Clyde Lewis really is. Ground Zero has been off the air for several days because his host is in the middle of a serious medical crisis. As a result, he's

asking fans to help him again. Not only has bills and living expenses, but that is his entire source of income. He doesn't have a contract with the radio network. It's just what comes in at the moment, in the same way that we are. It was really blessed to have Travis and Lance step in and do the broadcast when I was gone, but his broadcast has been shut down. That means that his advertising revenue has gone to zero as well. His producer Ron Patten said that Clyde recently

countered a medical emergency due to kidney failure. It's been in the hospital for about a week on dialysis along with getting physical therapy. The good news is that his health is gradually improving and there's hope that he'll get back on air with the show soon. Thank you very much for your support through prayers and good thoughts. As Clyde does have medical insurance, there are miscellaneous bills associated with his medical issue. Our primary income source is subscriptions,

but unfortunately that is stagnated due to his illness. Furthermore, our advertising revenue is on hold until he's back on broadcasting, and we don't receive any money from our radio syndication. We also pay for studio rental and have a staff. So can you please help us with donations? That's what they're asking for. So I would just recommend him for prayers.

I don't know Clyde that well, but you know, whenever we go through things and our circumstances, we always pray for God to help us in our circumstances and to relieve of these things. Sometimes we go through them just because it is a growing experience that God wants us to go through. So we'll never know, really in this

life exactly what is behind these things. So sometimes in his kindness, God says no. And I'm not saying that's the situation here, but I'm saying, please pray for him, and please pray that God will bless him in these circumstances and that God will bless us to make him closer to him going through this type of thing. And that'd be my prayer for anybody who's going through something like that. Real quickly, let's take a quick look at some news that we skipped over. We were just talking

about grabbing Newsom or the nuisance guy. As we talk about him. I thought it was pretty amazing to hear him say that them that that basically the Democrats need to be more culturally normal.

or something, and for the state of California. And they did try to do that in California, and you know, it was so out of the cultural norm that it lost. Even in California, homosexual marriage lost. And this is even with Tim Cook contributing millions of his own money and pledging matching amounts from Apple for homosexual marriage. It's still lost. With all that, and he has the audacity to talk

about culturally normal. It was imposed by the Supreme Court and defiance of state laws and defiance of state constitutions, and they had no authority to make that determination. And the Tenth Amendment was precisely to stop that type of thing. Yeah, is pretty amazing to me that he was talking about being culturally normal, and of course he can say anything he wants and he's running, and you know what he's going to do once he gets in based on his

past behavior. Well, Biden was also giving illegal aliens FAHA backed mortgages. We just find this out from the current administration's HUD. Illegal aliens got federally backed mortgages during the Biden Harris regime years. Scott Turner, who is now Trump's HUD secretary, characterized this as a significant policy failure, evidence of what he called misplaced priorities that favored illegals over

American home buyers. There were over twelve million illegal aliens that came over the border, straining our housing supply and making the costs go up, and the government was helping them to get loans, something that it wasn't doing to all Americans. Even so, he worked with a gnome at DHS to make sure that only Americans did us are living in HUD funded housing. Well, again, the government doesn't really have the authority on the Constitution to give loans

to people and subsidized loans for people. But if they're going to do something like that, it is truly outrageous that they would do it to illegal aliens. But of course we know why that happens. Even though this is bad for citizens, even though citizens are paying taxes and on the debt that they are incurring, subsidizing housing for people coming from other countries and raising the price of housing, it's really good for the banks. And that's one of

the reasons why it's happening here. Taxpayers subsidizing government ensured home loans for illegals just what the bank's ordered. Biden's policy amounted to a generational betrayal of citizens and prospective home buyers, pushed aside over the last four years, amid the worst housing availability and a generation, and driven by an out of control climate crisis spending and an invasion of illegals that strained an already tight housing market.

They were just going to retract it in total. The Economic Commitment of climate change as the title of it. The economists discovered that flawed data from Uzbekistan.

global survey. But when they did actually go out and do a detailed survey, when they looked at areas where the government was going to come in and build a dam, for example, and they looked at when they did that, they were going to be very specific because handing out

people money as they relocate them. And so they compared that to the way that they had estimated these other things, because the government would typically, as George Bush would say, misunderestimated the number of people that they're going to have to pay off. And so when they looked at that misunderestimation, they said, if we if we extrapolate this out, which again when we do this with the vaccine, they have a fit, but that's really the way that it works.

So for twenty months, the study was touted by Bloomberg, sand in Forms and countless mainstream outlets. They helped to manufacture wildly misleading narrative of an impending climate catastroph How many times have we seen the world is ending and never never happens. Headline like this climate change to cause thirty eight trillion dollars a year and damages by twenty

forty nine. I think they got that wrong. I think they make climate change policies are going to cause thirty eight trillion dollars a year and damage by twenty forty nine.

they're waiting until they bring in the heavy artillery. You know, we have these people calling for ceasefire. The Russians said, oh, they're just calling for a ceasefire in Ukraine because they want to regroup and build some more weapons. That's really what I think is happening here. I don't think that that they're trying to move on from this. And so Trump has filed for divorce from NATO over Ukraine. I

don't think that's going to happen either. As a matter of fact, I haven't seen this reported except with RT, and even they are skeptical, and the subtitle they say, well, it remains to be seen if Washington is serious about this. But it is a document that was produced out of the White House. It is the twenty twenty five National Security Strategy of the US, the document that was released on December fourth, which is pretty amazing because the stuff that is saying is true and it would be good

if it were true. It's basically talking about pulling back Europe from war and distancing ourselves from Europe as they go into this suicidal circling of the drain that they're involved in, downgrading China from a pacing threat to a competitor in economic issues. But I don't think any of this stuff is really going to happen with the Trump administration.

a great detailed, structured plan. Basically it involved market choices and involved through tax code structure and savings accounts and things like that, giving people the economic power to make these decisions, giving them the information to make these decisions, eliminating the some of the anti competitive rules have been put in at state and federal level, so there was competition, but also giving people information about health providers and insurance

companies that have been hidden from people. All those types of things were there. They were all necessary. They would have reduced costs, that would have made us more intelligent consumers and given people economic power to do that. And that was all just deep sixth memory hold right after the election. This I don't understand what the purpose of this is unless when I saw that it was this

is an article that's published by RT. Perhaps this is aimed at Russia, at Europe, and perhaps this is kind of a carrot and a stick approach to these two organizations. I don't think that's really going to happen. The document is unapologetically partisan, crediting Trump personally for brokerang peace and eight conflicts, but organizes US strategy around three pillars homeland defense,

the Western Hemisphere, and economic renewal. Secondary forces focuses rather include selective partnership in Asia, Europe, Middle East, and Africa. But it is basically the way they summarize it is that it moves from global cop to regional hegemon and a ideological retreat where democracy promotion is explicitly abandoned. Quote, we seek peaceful commercial relations without imposing democrat change, and as Russia says, tell that to the Venezuelans. So basically

they're paraphrasing George Washington and his farewell address. And I don't believe that this is the policy of the Trump administration at all.

powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.