Mon Episode #2120: Republicans Begging For Police State

the right? What does it tell us about both the left and the right? And what does it warn us those of us who are not a part of either of these tribes? What does it tell us about what we can expect from both of these groups. It's very concerning. We're going to take a look at what happened and what was said about it before and after we'll be right back stay with us. Well, we had a problem

with our broadcast. What we do is we upload to restream, which then sends it out to mini platforms, and so we can't restream is down said anything under our control. It's the site restream is down, so we have to pick one. So we're going to be broadcasting on Rumble. If you're on Rumble, We're going to try to leave messages on other sites to tell people to come to Rumble if they want to see the show live. But we're on Rumble right now and not broadcasting live on

any of the other platforms. Of course, the full show will be up today on all the different platforms. But let's take a look at what happened over the weekend at the New King's Rally. This is la massive amounts of people in the streets that you can see. We had over seven million people they estimate across the country. Huge crowds here in Tennessee and Knoxville. They had the largest dimonst ever that they've had in Knoxville is not one of the hard left cities like Nashville and Memphis

and Tennessee. It's kind of I guess, like they say purple. They've got some Republican officials, they've got some Democrat officials. This is what Julie need I go. There's Chicago. Here's an aerial shot painting the people, and we got one coming up that is a time lapse that I think gives you a better idea of the flow of people. But this is quite a few people. Yeah, this is This is across the country pretty much every city there you go and uh yeah, there's Chicago. Look at it

in a time lapse thing. I don't like this song either, not as quite as grating as the YMCA, I think. But nevertheless, what we were told by the people before this, people like Mike Johnson and others are telling us that, you know, you've got this emergency in all these different places. Why Trump has to go there. The entire country is on fire, right and these people are going to be very dangerous and radical. They needed to get and they did.

In some areas, like in Texas. They called up extra security, they called up in the National Guard, which is a precaution. But nothing happened, nothing happened at all. As a matter of fact, this is what they're telling everybody about all the radical terrorists everywhere. This is what they watch. The cut back and forth between what they say this is and the reality on the ground that people have interspersed there. What they're saying about these various places, and the clips

of the various places. President Trump will end the radical left reign of terror in Portland once and for all Portland. And you see fires, dancing animals, you see fights and fires all over place.

there's no difference, folks, between Trump and Trudeau. One of them is a communist, the other one is a technical crat.

But they lie to you about the same things, always trying to create an emergency, always telling you that there's a problem when there isn't a problem, so they can use excessive horse And so the story from Ross story said, for No Kings Day, I wore an inflatable bear costume and I saw America in all of its glory this week, blind to constitutional law in US history, Trump borders are Tom Holman said that protesting ICE quote could lead to

bloodshed and people dying. Yeah, because they'll kill you. By suggesting that massed ICE agents could kill protesters for simply shouting hateful things at them, Homan was building the permission structure for federal agents to use full force violence against non violent protesters. And we're seeing this over and over again. People show up and they're at large, massive people, they're in the road, and these guys start shoving, pushing, shooting,

running over people. Sing it over and over again. We just had a situation where a group of people who were following ICE and documenting what they're doing. One of them a lawyer. They rammed his car arrested him. These are the people who show up a bunch of thugs, just like Tom Homan, except unlike Tom Homan, they don't all get a grocery bag of fifty thousand dollars in it. They do get a fifty thousand dollars bonus for signing up and for meeting their quotas, though we'll talk more

about that later. More than that, his statement was meant to groom the public homean statement the Trump administration is trying to get US citizens used to the idea that federal agents could use lethal force to the point of killing people against anyone who exercises their constitutional right to peacefully protest government actions that they don't like. That's what's

involved here. On too many videos circulating on social media, masked ICE agents have been recorded getting more and more aggressive with members of the public who were escalating non violent exchanges into violent exchanges. Federal agents have been caught on video body slamming people to the ground, kneeling on

people's necks, pointing armed weapons at close range. More than twenty people have died at ICE's hens, including US citizens, but this tally is artificially low because Trump administration tightly controls media access to ice detention facilities. It was in

Chicago where I think they started setting this pattern. We had that apartment building and they had men groppelling out of black helicopters and so forth, pulling people out in the middle of the night, one o'clock in the morning and putting guns in their faces, men, elderly people, children, and the one elderly lady who had lived in Chicago for a very long time, and we know that Chicago is one of the more violent cities. Nevertheless, she said, I had never had a gun stuck in my face

before these guys came here. They're not helping, They're making matters worse. It's just like the war on drugs. It doesn't change anything about the war on drugs. It just gives you a second problem because it's always about control home. And like Trump seems oblivious to what the First Amendment says that Congress shall make no law of bridging the freedom of speech or the right of the people to peacefully assemble. Well, there is no law here. What we

have is an executive order. Trump does as he pleases, and that's why they have the no king's issue there. It's a great label for it, except that I think it needs to be put into context. Life Site News said, these people are anti Christian because Christ is a king and we have the Kingdom of heaven and the kings are not a bad thing. Well they are on earth. Christ might be the king of kings and Lord of lords, and he is. However, these people who act like kings

think that they are God. They don't act like a king. They act like the Lord Jesus Christ. That's why the founders said no king but Jesus. And that's why they said lex Rex, the law is king. These people have sworn to obey the law, and from Trump to Homan to the thug with a mask on his face, they all swore as a condition of their office to uphold the constitution. That's what their authority is based on. And these people are to go back to the example of

the Lord of the Rings. You remember the guys who were the stewards of Gondor, and they wanted to be the kings and they did not want the king to return. Well, these guys are stewards, that's what they are. They are not the king. They want to think that they're the king, but they're unfaithful stewards, and when they violate their oath to the Constitution that gives them their authority, they have no legitimate authority. They have a lot of force, though,

and they're willing to use that without any restraint. It was the very first amendment to the Constitution, and it was key to getting the states to go along with the Constitution. Many states refuse to sign to support the Constitution after it was drafted in seventeen eighty seven because they were fearful of a strong federal government with no

constraints to protect people from overreach. It was a sticking point that refused to yield, as the objecting states would not support the Constitution without a guarantee of individual liberties, including freedom of religion and most importantly, the freedom to speak openly together and to criticize the government. Well, because those things can't be separated, right, You can't have free

exercise religion without freedom of speech. And if you have freedom of speech, it's going to be tied to you're going to be free to speak about your religion. Of course, the left ones to shut that down as well. Both the left and the right are coming for every aspect of the Constitution, especially free speech. Neither of them values it, and we need not fall for the virtue signaling and the lies of either side. The reality is is that

both sides have been pushing for this civil war. They both want to fight each other, and we're going to be stuck in the middle. That's the reality of this thing. Freedom of speech, beyond the reach or control of government, stands as a beacon of freedom throughout the world, and the fact that freedom of speech is under attack everywhere for every reason is one of the key issues. And we see this everywhere across the world, and people just

don't appreciate the importance of it. I think so that's why Trump's executive order declaring that the federal government would now punish the Centers, whom he labeled domestic terrorists since chills down the spine of anyone who has the slightest

concept of history. People in MAGA who support Trump's centralized thought control have no concept of what it's like to live under authoritarian rule, even though we get a taste of it under Biden and the January the sixth stuff that was coming after people who had peacefully for the

most part had peacefully exercised their right to protest. It got violent, but again, as many people on the right will point out, that violence was instigated by aggressive police who started pushing, shoving, and shooting people and firing tear gas in the crowd. They could understand that on January the sixth, they can't understand the principle. If it's somebody that they don't like, they just want them hurt, and they're no different than the left when it comes to that.

I am so sick and tired of these MAGA people saying I voted for it, and I just want to say, yes, you did, and you should have known better, and you voted for it. I didn't. I didn't vote for either one of these thugs. Wouldn't vote for the left or the right. So people in MAGA who support this don't know what it's like to live under the authoritarian rule. Like in China you have Shooshing Pining has installed facial recognition software into China's public security apparatus, records everyone at

cross lights and bus stops. Of course we have something here like that too, but it has a nice fascist flare to it. And by that I mean it's a corporate government partnership. The flock cameras are doing the same thing, but of course here, since it's run by corporation and used by government, we pretend that government is not funding it and the government has nothing to do with it.

So we put a nice corporate veneer on it so that people can get rich off of the tyranny, and then we say, oh, it's legal because it's not being done by the government. So it's interesting on raw story. Of course. You know, the Marxists are cheered by these leftists as well, Jay Guavara and all the rest of these people who do this stuff as well. There is an amazing blindness on both the left and the right to the actions of people that are you know, they only look at first of all, do I like you

or dislike you? Do I agree with you or disagree with you? If I disagree with you or dislike you, then I will applaud everything that is done to you. I think a good example of this is that pastor that got shot in the face with the pepper ball. You know, I look at what this guy's done. He's been with BLM marches, he has desecrated his church with all kinds of weird kind of satanic stuff as well

as LGBT stuff. I don't agree with him religiously or politically on anything I think, But I really don't agree with the thugs shooting people who are just exercising their speech on the sidewalk, shooting them from a rooftop in the face. How do we make an excuse for that? How do we cheer that? Even worse? How do we cheer Trump doing extra judicial killings, blowing up ships out in the ocean at a whim. How do we cheer that? And yet people do so? James Madison, he says, we'll

be proud of No King's Day. Huge crowds marks in major cities, Smaller gatherings sprung up across small town USA for No Kings protests against the Trump administration. Again, as I said, even in Knoxville, the largest crowd they've ever had. So they said, a new King's protest to crying Trump surveillance worries emerged. This is from Reuters. It's like, oh, now you're paying attention to the surveillance state, which was also put in by your guy Biden. And see that's it.

It's the left right march at tyranny, and these people are blind to it. That's why they keep switching them back and forth. They go from Trump to Biden, to Trump to somebody else right, and then everybody thinks it was the other kam that did it to them when

their own team did it as well. People who take part in Saturday's mass New King's protests against Trump's administration may be targeted for federal government surveillance and a range of technology that could include facial recognition, phone hacking, said civil libertarians. Well, the left thought it was just great when Biden geo fence conservatives on January sixth, But there's going to be a oh no moment for MAGA again as well as they're cheering this from Trump. So in

preparation for this, you see the right wing media. Here's a good example of this from zero Hedge. The right wing fear mongering about what was going to be coming up. No Kings kicks off across the country, the States prepare for violence. There was no violence. The billionaire funded No Kings protests. That's their their fallback position, right. All this whole thing was astro turf. I'm sorry, but you don't get AstroTurf seven million people in city after city of

people have legitimate griefs, gripes. They should say about what Trump is doing. And you know this is he is activating people. That's what they should look at. The right is blind to the unconstitutional authoritarian actions of Trump because they'll excuse any means because they want the ends. I want these illegal aliens out here, and I don't care what you do should have been the street. I don't care.

And they don't realize how that is aalvianizing the people who want to turn us into a Marxist state and people who are somewhere in the middle. That's moving them into the radical left category. In reaction, the events are supposed to be peaceful and lawful, but stick around. We'll be watching throughout the day while these future rocket scientists get their wiggles out. A similar protest in June descended

into political violence, and so that did not happen. And just as you've seen the clips of Mike Johnson and Stephen Miller and Trump claiming that the cities are on fire, no they weren't, not till you got there. Officials in several states, and even after you got there, officials in several states boosted security ahead of this. In Virginia and in Texas you had the governors ordering state troopers and guards. In Austin, for example, the Texas governor said an anti

file link protest was about to go down. This is the other thing too. Antifah is as anti free speech as you can get. It is to say antifa, and it stands for anti First Amendment FA not fascist, but First Amendment. They're against free speech. And I've told the story many times about when Karen was at a protest at the abortion center there in Austin. It's first time

I saw antiphah. They show up. The guy's got a black sign to cover up her sign that says that abortion is a black genocide, and so he puts his black sign up in front of hers, and she goes down low and he goes down the low to cover it. She goes so the two of them are going up and down, up and down. He had nothing to say. He just didn't want her to be able to speak anti First Amendment. But of course the left always does

a great job of labels right to them. Of course, anybody is a fascist that is to the right anywhere, to the right of their radical leftist communism, but by calling themselves anti fascist, wants to really be a fascist, right. Nobody wants to say, no, I'm pro fascist. Even the fascist deny that, just like the communists deny that. The communists they call themselves antifah, or they call themselves socialists or whatever progressives, but they have it's a great label.

So you had a lot of people that were wearing I'm antifah shirt she had. George Conway was showing up, and they tried to make a big deal about oh, look, look he's antifah. Well the problem is, I said, is that you're pushing people into that camp. You know, the biggest recruiter for all this stuff is not George Soros, it's Donald Trump. So I don't think this is AstroTurf. I think there's too many people. I think that Trump is motivating them. This is a pushback against militarization, against

the posse committatis law, and so we're seeing polarization. We're seeing Trump galvanizing and activating more people than Sorrows ever did so in Maryland Town in the university's chapter of the Young Democratic Socialists of America demanded that the school declare itself a sanctuary campus. It's at it again, this time activating, organizing, mobilizing students as woke foot soldiers, and the Democrat Party's latest they want to call it a

color revolution under the billionaire funded movement known as No Kings. Well, you know, it's always this what about ism. They'll come back and say what about Soros? What about this? What about that? And just look at it for what it was. What happened there. There was no violence, and again I see it as as a trucker protests. And you know, I didn't want to show up to this thing because I didn't want to be labeled as supporting what they

support politically. I don't support anything they support politically. You know, I don't agree with MAGA people they say that. You know, I would agree with the ends that they want, their stated ends, but I am repulsed by the means that they're choosing. But when it comes to left, I don't want the end result that they want. And of course they use a lot of the same means as well,

but are reprehensible. What's unique about this protest at Townsend University is how these dark money NGOs can rile up young people using the same tactics. US intelligence agencies employee overseas and regime change operations. Well, let me just crank this for you, zero Hedge. The US intelligence agencies don't limit their operations to overseas. That's a newsflash for you, is it? Where have you been you paid attention to what's going on in America? I mean, it's just the CIA.

The NSA does not limit their criminal actions to foreign lands. That's the big problem. That's why they should be gone. The Right is just fooling themselves. This is an organic, genuine anger at Trump tactics, and they're whistling in the dark when they tell themselves that it's all just AstroTurf

done by zero hedge. So what's more interesting is that when towns and administrative staff as members of the Young DSA for a list of speakers at today's event, citing safety concerns amid rising political violence, the socialist group refused to have their speakers vetted. Well, here we have the right demanding that everybody get permission for speech. They return speech into a privilege and saying that you ought to be completely investigated if you dare to speak against the government.

They used to be repulsed by that type of thing.

for that kind of stuff as well. I don't agree with that, and I don't think that that's something that we ought to say. Well, look, you know, they're obviously got something to hide, right, didn't we talk about the fact that Larry Ellison and others were saying, well, it's going to be great, and we have a surveillance state. Everybody's going to be on their best behavior because we'll be watching everything that you say. I think that is reprehensible,

and now the right is applauding it. Students move the event fearing the speakers will be targeted by the Trump administration. Yeah, that's a real issue, just like with Biden, which has threatened to pursue and punish liberal activist groups if their names are shared with federal authorities. It's the same thing that Biden did on January the sixth. Why hit the right figure this out? I mean, then went through this. It isn't like you have to say, well, historically we

have seen this and this and other countries. You just went through all this stuff and you want to push the left through it now, and you don't realize that left's going to do it to you again. I mean, they're making this an established precedent that we go after our political enemies when we went political office, and we lock up our opponents, and we go after the other side and lock them up. I don't want to live

in America like that. It's disgusting to me. So dangerous rhetoric has been laid for the last ten years, calling Trump and his supporters fascists and Nazis and dehumanizing political opponents allowing armed left wing radicals here. They do the same thing right and the anti five people to mobilize and justify civil terrorism operations. And so conservatives are embracing the left's hate speech ethic. Now I don't like this. You're ramping up the rhetoric. Somebody's going to get hurt.

Speech is violence, and we need to censor you, and we need to shut down your rallies and your speeches and so forth. Look, the answer to bad speech is more speech. It's what Charlie Kirk did. He said, you know, prove me wrong and we'll have a debate with this. You can't go down this path of shutting down the people that you disagree with. I don't care whether you're on the left or the right. And the left is just as bad about this. They call everybody fascists and Nazis,

and the right calls everybody antifa. If you're out there protesting, then you're obviously antifa. You know, they're just as blind and just as you know, prone to putting people in groups as the left is. How Charlie Kirk's murderer was a condition to think that conservatives are fascists, said one person. Western Lindsman, Yeah, that's right. It's going to all end that way, right, And they said communists are very good at this, said does zero Hedge, Well, again, the First

Amendment is just like the Second Amendment. When you got people are going to use guns to kill people, what you do is you have guns to defend yourself. When you have the First Amendment that is used that's going to spread lies and kill people in spread tyranny, you need to have more of the First Amendment. So the answer to somebody doing the wrong thing with guns or doing the wrong thing with speech is the same. You

have more speech, you have more guns to protect yourself. Otherwise, when you go down this path, you wind up living in North Korea. So the zero Hedge finishes with North Korea saying, we can't imagine a movement that's more steep than an idiocracy than citizens able to freely demonstrate in public against a so called authoritarian king. Try that in North Korea. Well, it's not as if we haven't seen Trump use his police powers against people, and he's boasting

that he'll do it even more. And as these idiots say their speech should be should be shut down, and the Feds should investigate them. I mean, this is the same article these people are saying, look at these guys, these radical people, they didn't want to give their names. They went somewhere so they wouldn't be investigated and vetted, investigated by the secret police in Washington, and they say, well, you can go out there and speak. Well, we see

what's coming. That's what we're speaking against. We see that this is ramping up. Yes, we're not at North Korea level yet, but I tell you, when you have a situation where you know it came uncomfortably close with Charlie Kirk being killed, they came uncomfortably close to the situation you had in North Korea where when the dear leader died, everybody had to show up and cry. And if you didn't cry loudly enough or longly enough, were you were

target of investigation of the government. Same thing happened Charlie Kirk. Unless you bow the knee to him and pay proper respect, they came after you. What are you gonna say, Lance, It's.

you go, yeah, mister king, he loves us. Donald Trump is really enjoying being king. It's good to be the king, he thinks. And seeing and AI after AI, he's pinning himself up as king. And of course in order to kiss the ring, Johnson had to say, nonsense like this.

outrageous purposes. But the Democrats and the Senate have shown that they're afraid of that crowd, that they don't want to bow, that they want to bow to them, bow the need of them, and they don't want to take incoming.

which is exactly what they talk about the left doing. Look, they called us Nazis, they called us fascists anything, So he just does the same thing, the mirror bookends of each other. I'm afraid. Well. Fox News actually put a clip back to back of Mike Johnson talking about that hate America rally right there, and then they immediately followed it up with the smiling protesters waving American flags at these rallies that were happening. And that's newsworthy because it

was done by Fox News. It true the attention CNN media reporter Brian Stelter again, Brian Stelter, one of the people who has focused on censoring other people who have different opinions. Nevertheless, on Saturday, Fox News butted clips of House Speaker Mike Johnson attacking the hate America No King's rallies with peaceful protesters waving American flags. Stelter posted it to X He said, Fox News just did this, by

the way, as people walked by waving American flags. A Fox reporter in Atlanta tossed to a clip of Johnson's hate America venom, along with a Hakeem Jeffreys sound bite, then back to normal people protesting in a local park. So it was Madison Scarpino, Fox News reporter showed a video peaceful, smiling protesters at the rally in Atlanta, while saying millions of Americans were expected to come out across the country. Just here in Atlanta, rally organizers expected ten

thousand people. That's checking out from what we're seeing so far. You see the sea of people holding signs, chanting, several speakers. So far, they're fired up. She said, what are they fired up about? Do they all get a paycheck from George Sorows? This is what the right is telling itself and that's why they're going to continue to go down this path. They're not going to be deterred by this

because they're telling themselves a lie. That's all just AstroTurf. Now, people are fed up with the policies that Trump is doing. Even if you agree with the end result, you don't like the means that he is doing right and he doesn't have to use those means. I've talked many times about what could be done about it. For example, the guy who was in Chicago and he gets hit by ice and he doesn't have any he's legal, he's got his paper, but he doesn't have his papers on him.

He's working at a job and so he doesn't have his identity papers. So they take him. They find out that, yeah, he's really legal, and then they find him one hundred and thirty dollars for not having his identity paper with him, like we're under some kind of Nazi occupation. The reality then is that he says, I don't have one hundred and thirty dollars. I'm living in a rent free apartment because you know he's not who knows, but he's not working very much. So again that's the issue. Stop giving

that guy a rent free apartment. You don't need to send out Nazi thugs with masks and body armor to start kicking people, ramming people of their cars, shooting people in the face of pepper balls. That's not the right way to do this. That's the way that somebody who's a thug like Donald Trump, a mafia mob boss, and somebody like Tom Homan would do it. But that's not

the right way to do it. You get rid of the welfare magnet number one and then you start to enforce the law, and instead of picking the people up and then catch and release, you actually deport them. What's so difficult about that? Well, many House Republicans are calling

these hate America rallies. Jeffries calls it patriotism, Scarpenas said, before a clip of him saying I support the right of every single American to participate in rallies that will take place this week, showing up to express dissent against an out of control administration that's as American as motherhood, baseball, and apple pie. Well, I don't know where the Democrat Party is on apple pie and baseball, but I know

they don't like motherhood. They've come out against motherhood. Scarpena added, We're going to keeping an eye on all these protests nationwide, looking for any potential clashes, as the governors of both Texas and Virginia say they have their state National Guard troops ready to go if needed. So again, yes, it's.

thing about it. He's making these people look good, you know, when he starts shutting down the First Amendment and censoring people because he doesn't like what they say, whether it's about Israel, whether it's about him or his thuggish police. Then he doubles down on the thuggishism. So again Johnson said, we call it the Hate America Rally. Well, that hasn't aged too well. George Conway comes out as antifob out of No King's rally. This is from the Daily Caller.

This is the way they're going to portray it. The left picks the terms, as I said before, you know, they want to be anti fascist, and so we accept their narrative. We can't come up with a term ourself, so we just go with their their labels. It's very much like.

to show a guillotine. Do you remember how many times the left and the mainstream media showed pictures of that hangman's scaffolding and the Hangman's news that January the sixth, ad nauseum. Right, one person puts that up and they all use that shot. And here you've got Daily Caller on the right now saying somebody had a picture of a guillotine. Well, oh, we can't have that. We've got trouble right here in River City, right. This is the way they both operate.

in costume. They interviewed a guy who was in a unicorn inflatable costume, and he says, I'm trying to look as ridiculous as we can to protest Trump being ridiculous. And you know, I got to say, I'm not a fan of going to demonstrations. I think it's important to show up in mass and to say that we're against something. But every time you do that, you always got people

who are going to show up. I remember whenever the Libertarian Party we get together and have you know, we had a convention or something, and people would show up and it would be really embarrassing. It's like, I'm not with that guy in his underwear over there. Okay, that's

not what I'm about. And so, you know, you always wind up in a situation like that where even if they don't have agent provocateurs who come in and pick a fight with the cops, or the cops don't pick a fight with people, and it turns into melee like January the sixth, Even if you don't have that, you're going to have people who show up absolutely embarrassed. I have nothing to do with this guy or his cause.

I don't know who these people are. Anyway, this guy's I've never interviewed a unicorn live on MSNBC, and he said, well, we're here peacefully protesting, looking as ridiculous as we can, just so maybe we can appeal to the president because he is a ridiculous leader that is normalizing abuse of power. We can't stand at an act like nothing is happening. But again it is. Did it change anything? If it changed anything, what it did was Trump's actions are moving

people towards Andy fall. The no King's protesters silent when democrats rule as monarchs, says Just the News, And I agree with that. But the other side of this is that the right is silent when Trump is rule as an absolute monarch. Can we just get the full truth here? You know, they'll tell you the truth about the other side, they'll lie about their side, and Just the News usually does a pretty good job. But this is a one

sided article. When anyone starts bleeding about dictatorship, they have to start with defining regal or king like actions, and they need to look at the activity and the actions of recent presidents to get a sense of perspective. And so what he's saying is, well, Biden, what about Biden? What about this? It's a swat about ism. They can't police their own. Instead they excuse their own because the

other guys did it. And that's how we ratchet everything down in this downward spiral that our society is in. So one person on mediaite says, well, the protests were great for social media, but not for meaningful change, and that's the way it always is. Reportedly drew seven million people across the nation. Good for the organizers as attendance

is growing. But this might also be a problem. Not because the marchers aren't sincere, not because moral clarity doesn't matter, it does, but because every protest that doesn't lead to an organization might be worse than no protests at all. It gives the feeling of agency without the fact of it. It lets us post share and check the box that I did something, while the machinery of power keeps humming, unbothered. This is the trap of protests in the age of algorithm.

It's not the demonstrators are performative. All politics involves performance, but the performance has become the point. The march happens, the scigns get photographed, the videos go viral, Everybody goes home feeling like they did something. Meanwhile, nothing changes except your feed, which has already moved on. Every protest becomes a pressure valve, releasing energy that might otherwise build into something lasting. Political scientists, to Fecki, calls us tactical free

the paralysis that follows a viral high. They said, the Women's March drew four million people and built no durable structure. Occupy Wall Street absolutely electrified a generation, then entirely evaporated. And of course he's looking at things on the left. This is media eye. I see the same thing with the Tea Party march. I remember when the Tea Party March happened and there was a huge number of people in Washington, and the media tried to downplay the number

of people that was there, but it was big. But again, it had no There was no real organization that came out of it. He had a lot of people, made a lot of money. Glenn Bike really milked the Tea Party stuff, but there wasn't any to find principles even about it. And so I said, so you're tax enough already, are you? Well, what's the problem then? Do you need to cut spending or just cut taxes? And where do you cut spending? What are your priorities? What do you

stand for? Do you stand for the constitution? On and on? There was nothing about it that was defined. And the same thing is true of these other movements. And so he looks at He says, movements that actually change the country are built on institutions that endure between spectacles, voter drives where no cameras were rolling, legal strategies that took years, local chapters meeting in church basements, doing the slow and glamorous work of accumulating power one conversation at a time.

He says, the march on Washington was an exclamation point on a sentence that took a decade to write. The march was the culmination and not the plan. But Trump's allies are not marching. They've been organizing and they're on school boards, election boards, election commissions, and state legislatures. They're passing laws, installing loyalists, dismantling oversight. They're disciplined, hierarchical, and relentless.

The progressive movement is networked, expressive, and episodic. MAGA has been hard at work building a movement while progressives seem content and posting a cleaver sign on Instagram and so again, it is it's organization, But I think it's important to have organization, to have a principle. The problem with MAGA is it's organized, but it's organized around what is organized around a king. It's organized around authoritarian move towards power.

It's not organized to restore the constitution. Just take a look at what Trump is doing about the people who criminally should be prosecuted for the lawfair that they did against him, he should be doing it in a way to restore the rule of law. Instead, what he's doing is he wants it to be seen as personal revenge.

Don't mess with me, or I'll get you. And all that does is escalate this in a downward sorrel spiral, so that the next guy will do the same thing, and so it becomes about accruing power to the presidency rather than taking power away from these people who have abused it. So Life Site News so was funded the

New King's Protest, attack America and Christianity, not just Trump. Well, the reality is is that this is you may not like the people that are there and don't I don't agree with move On or the Human Rights Campaign or these other people, but their main grief about all this is that, you know, what's this about not having kings?

Kings are good? Well, they say, you know, look look at the people who are funding this, and so they got all these people on the left are giving millions of dollars to some of these organizations, and I look at it and I say, well, how is this different than the right wing billionaires who are giving millions of dollars to Charlie Kirk's organization turning point. You know that was their political cause. It doesn't matter if you're going to allow that kind of money to be thrown around.

It doesn't matter whether it's left doing a right wing. It just gets people upset. That's what a lot of people criticize about Charlie Kirk. Oh, look, he was funded by the Koch brothers, or he was funded by this group or that group, or Israel or whatever. Get beyond who is funding them. That may tell you where this guy is going to be pushing people, but that doesn't necessarily tell the entire story.

it to go after any of the organization or anything. Instead, they're going to say, oh, well, if these people that more or less agree with that guy are protesting, then naturally it's going to be just as violent as of other times that we didn't do anything, So therefore we've got to come after all of you.

the King of kings and Lord of lords. Well, that's why I said before that the founders were not against Jesus. They made it clear, no king but Jesus, and they did not want to have earthly kings. And that's what these people should be saying. Then, of course, was it.

governments do in general. They rebel, like the devil did, against order, against hierarchy, against the immutable fact that Christ is king not only over each of them, but also over society by natural right. Well, I would say that Trump is the rebel against authority because the authority is the Constitution and he's rebelling against it. And it doesn't matter if Biden did it. Biden's not president right now. I protested Biden when he did it. I'll protest Trump

when he's doing it. Now. We need to speak out against that. He doesn't get a pass to do this because Biden did it. Let's get over that. People on the right need to get over that. The reality is is that the King is the law. The King is the constitution that they swear allegiance to. Well, for all the people who are saying that this is radical anti file communists, they can't keep their story straight on that either.

It's just like the zero Hedge thing that said, well, these people should be investigated, and they should be turned their names should be given to the government, but they should be glad they didn't live in a place like North Korea when they're pushing for North Korea. Well, the other thing that we see from all this is everybody's talking about how these are a bunch of old boomer protesters.

any kind of narrative. And so again, in this article from zero Hedge, they list all of the left wing funders of this kind of stuff and say, yeah, but on the other hand, so this is all being done as a color revolution by George Soros, And on the other hand is a bunch of old, aging Vietnam War protesters. So the again they break it down, two hundred ninety five million dollars to the No King's two point zero

partners and organizations. But again, look at both sides are doing this mostly unhinged white baby boomers dragged out of their retirement homes, they said. But the money and the dangerous radicals right right just can't make up their mind what to say about this, and on and on it goes. Ninety plus percent of the crowd is white and filled with retirees, said Eric Darry. White baby boomers who could have been home spending time with their grandkids instead hit

the streets on Saturday. And you can't make this up, said another that's actually zero Hedge. So again, were they paid by Soros to come out? Because you can't keep your narrative straight? Can you Boomers that the No Kings demonstrations still think they're the cool kids fighting the man like they were during the Vietnam War protests. Now the reality is is that Trump is motivating these people more than Soros fueled by billionaires. No Kings presents a color

revolutionary style mobilization against Trump. Another reactionary article from zero Edge where they have absolutely no sense of history, not even history of four years ago. That's the satsy thing about this. Over and over again we see this. And then you had articles about the furries who are joining the anti Trump No King's protests in DC. Yeah, you had the same situation at the Convoy protest in Canada.

You know, people were showing that it was a festival, they had kids, they had costumes and all the rest of this stuff, and Trudeau relentlessly labeled them as radical terrorists. Same playbook always used by the people in authority. It doesn't matter what they say, whether they're left wing or whether they're right wing, they always use the same script. Well, let's take a look at some of the comments.

And you do that once or twice, that doesn't say anything. But you do that one hundred times, two hundred times, they can very easily and very quickly hone in and pin down on where they think you fall on the spectrum and what you're likely to react to.

it's a bunch of antipop stuff. Then they complained, it's a bunch of old folks who just got out of the retirement home and they took in this before they went to their early bird special. What's one of their early Bird specials then anyway, I mean, they can't, they can't keep their stories straight, right, you're you're you know, your radical anti fad terrorists, or your a bunch of boomers who are doing this when they should be with

their grandkids. That's the narrative that they keep putting out there over and over again.

any way, shape or form. So yeah, free three fifty six ninety percent of the no Kings people went happily along with the covid authoritarianism, and they cheered it and they demanded it. You're absolutely right, it is the there's a strong delusion and derangement on both sides.

you know that a zebra had stripes? You know? God doesn't make the world gray and green like that. He has a lot of imagination and so we don't know what these.

just showing up in large numbers. And what he does is he has a rally there where people talk about why we should have peace and not war, specifically about and he had a great lineup of speakers. We can't get people to show up even for something like that, and so, you know, I always am kind of wary of protests because A, you know who am I going to be grouped with and seen as buying into their agenda? And that's why I'm not a joiner a any of

this kind of stuff. But the other part of it is also that you never know if there's going to be instigators on either side of this that are going to start violence and then people get blamed for it, like we saw in January the sixth, and so that's frequently the case. But this is widespread enough that I guess they didn't do anything. Just try to set up agent provocateurs anywhere real quickly.

subscribe Star that support us. And on subscribe Star we make sure that we post the links to the show every single day as well as links for the articles that are covered as well. So if that's something that are interested in, every tier of support gets that on subscribe Star. We really do thank those people, and I'll let people know that you can get a ten percent discount at rncstore dot com if you're looking to hopefully

stay outside of the medical industrial complex. They've got a lot of different products that can help you with your health.

on the jet and he's wearing a crown. Hmmm. Yeah, he's dropping excrement on the massive crowds of people there. And I said, when I saw that, it made me really angry. It motivated me. So I said, this video is a perfect metaphor Trump as King dumping excrement on America.

You know, excrement like destroying farms with tariffs, militarizing and federalizing police in the cities, starting wars, pricing fights with picking fights with every country, including those with whom we have trade surpluses, capricious, arbitrary, constantly shifting tear freights that destroy small and medium sized businesses, manufacturers, and farmers, and of course his wars and there he is a jet

dropping bombs on people. He loves that whole metaphor, doesn't he He can conduct war from a distance on all of us. I said, while RFK Junior will not stop his mRNA poison from Trump's previous reign. For the magatars who say that I've gone liberal, what do you want to conserve? Is there anything in America or the Constitution? Is there any business in any industry that you would want to conserve? Or is it okay for Trump to lock them down or to sanction them to death with tariffs?

I want to conserve the Constitution, peace, prosperity, in the rule of law. MAGA has become the Libs that they say that they're fighting. They are a perpetually offended mob that seeks tempos it's capricious whims on everyone else and foolishly believes that the precedents they set won't be used against them. That's as true of MAGA as it is of the left. They want to enforce what they want on everybody else. And so you saw that one guy

that was very noticeable there. It was actually a left wing influencer, Harry Sisson, who is specifically put in that video, and he said, can a reporter please ask Trump why he posted an AI video of himself dropping poop on me from a fighter jet. He said, that'd be great to know. Thanks, and then Senator Brian Schatz said, seriously, why would the president post an image on the internet of air dropping feces on American cities?

the jet, and he's wearing a crown. He also used AI to create a Time magazine cover of himself and a crown, which is captioned long Live the King. So he's really enjoying all this because it's all performance. So he wears a crown, wears wheels a sword. In another video as a song with the words Hail to the King plays and Nancy Pelosi and others bow to him. This is with anybody else, you would say it's a joke,

but with Trump it's not. It's a fantasy. The New York City Police Department said more than one hundred thousand people peacefully attended the No King's protest in America's most populoist city, if Katismus hold. The event was the largest civil action in the US since the First Earth Day fifty five years ago. No major cidents or arrest other at other gatherings during the day, so again it was

across the country. And this is from Steve Watson. You know, I hate to see people that I worked with cheer the police state and authoritarian actions and these unconstitutional actions. Kimmel said, Trump is pretending that there's chaos for a military takeover. And you know, Kimmel that phrase, he's absolutely right about that. I've said that myself many times. Trump pretends that there's an emergency about everything so that he

can do executive orders and rule like a king. And he's pretending that there is chaos when there is none, just like Trudeau pretended that there was chaos and there was a violent faction when there was none. And yet Steve Watson takes him on, tries to make the case that there really is chaos and there really is a need for a military takeover. Like I said, I don't

understand what the matter with these Info Wars people. You know, they we had documentary after documentary about the police state, and when I got there, I started working on asymmetric warfare. How is concerned that Obama was setting up the military, training them to fight in the cities, giving them m wraps and all the rest of the stuff. Remember that, And of course you know Info Wars is against it because it was Obama, but now that it's Trump, they're

for it. How disgusting is that? So Kim we was back on the air despite having abysmal ratings and said, there's no chaos in Portland, none, there's no chaos in Chicago, there's no chaos in LA. They're pretending that there's chaos as a pretense for a military takeover. And he's absolutely right about that, and Watson is wrong. The comments fly in the face of documented repeated ambushes, assaults, and coordinated threats against the ICE agents, particularly in Portland and Chicago.

Show us the evidence of Watson YouTube that frequently once you grab some some social media stuff and show us the clips of how people getting violent with ICE or is it the other way around? I've seen it the other way around quite frankly. Trump dumps poop on the Kings, No King's protesters and epic video, says WND. They think it's epic. I don't think it's epic. Many people loved it, and that really got me upset as well. But of course WND and Breitbart and you know, and for wards

they think this is great. Trump trolls and o King's protests with a top gun style meme, and again it just he celebrates war, He plays the military industrial complex. This is a chicken hawk if ever there was one. He's as bad as Lindsey Graham. And then you've got people out there when he boasts about blowing ships out of the water without any due process and violation of US and international law. You got idiots like this celebrating him.

gonna drop a drop excrement on us as well. He's done that in so many different ways. Well, Michael Keaton spoke to Maga. I like what he had to say. It's the same thing I would say to them.

Fifth Avenue that still vote for me. Basically, what he's saying in parentheses is these people are so stupid, they're so dumb, they'd still vote for me.

So we're going to come back. I'm going to talk about the reality of what's happening. They think you're stupid, and you are stupid if you cheer this nonsense, because what you're going to get is the boot of the government stopping on your face forever.

ever wanted. We're going to sacrifice a little bit of freedom here and there, but it's going to be a right wing authoritarian state.

And first of all, he sued him. And then even after the book was released and people could see that the description was accurate, he's still continuing the suit because it's just about punishing people. It's not about whether or not you're going to prevail. You punish them by making them hire lawyers and go through.

create a framework for targeting domestic enemies, and cast his political rivals as subhuman. In asserting his right to wage secret war and summarily execute those that he deems to be terrorists without any proof or due process, Trump used that bizarre speech to take aim at cities that he claimed to run by radical left Democrats, including Chicago, La New York, and San Francisco. We're going to straighten them out. One by one. This is going to be a major

part for some of the people in this room. That's a war too, a war from within. We should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for our military. And again, this is everything I fought against at info Wars. I just you know, I just can't say it enough. You know, police state documentaries to warn people against it. Report after report about asymmetric warfare and the prepositioning of military assets and cities and changing the rules of engagement

for police into a shoot first curriculum. That's what the head of the police academy. And we'll see where was it. Was it in Arizona? I think it was he had that the police came after homeless man who was camped.

Said that's it. I'm out of here. They want me to teach this shoot first curriculum and I'm not going to do it. It's against everything that we've ever done. And that's what we're seeing here. What Trump is doing is against everything this country has ever done. He said. The increasing use of the armed forces within the US represents an extraordinary violation of the Posse Commatatis Act. Let me just interrupt here a second. Do you know where the Posse Comitatus Act came from and what the history

of that was. It was created in eighteen seventy eight. From the end of the Civil War until the eighteen until eighteen seventy seven, the South suffered under a federalized police force. It's called Reconstruction. You should look it up, because nobody will put it in any school textbook. They won't talk about what happened during Reconstruction. You want to talk about corruption, You want to talk about abuse of force.

That was Reconstruction on steroids, and people had had so much of that that even the people in Washington, the Republicans, pushed through the Posse Comma Posse Commatatis Act to make sure that kind of abuse that we suffered under reconstruction never happened again. So banning the use of federal troops to execute domestic law enforcement has long been seen as

fundamental to America's democratic tradition. However, the president's deployments continued to nudge this country ever closer to becoming a genuine police state. They come amid a raft of other Trump administration authoritarian measures designed to undermine the constitution weaken democracy. Those include attacks on birthright citizenship. Now here's why I differ with them. I don't think birthright citizenship is what

the fourteenth Amendment is about at all. That was about giving citizenship to people who had who had been newly freed as slaves and to say that they live here. But it did not change the fact that you could, you know, you could be born here. But if you're not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, you are not a non American citizen. For example, if your

parents are here legally as representatives of another country. You know, somebody's an ambassador from Spain, they have a child while they're here. That child is not an American citizen. So again, I think when we look at birthright citizenship, I disagree with them on that. But Trump has attacked free speech as well as the exercise of expansive unilateral powers like deporting people without due process and rolling back energy regulations and so forth, which I would agree with. Rolling back

the energy regulations. The regulations are put on by bureaucracies without due process, without the due process of having Congress pass laws. And I think that the energy regulation should be rolled back. And I think that the EPA should be rolled back. I think it ought to be gone. Its institutional, the EPA and all these other organizations. It's not just their regulations, as the entire institution needs to be gone. So he's not going far enough as far

as I'm concerned. But when you talk about deporting people, I'm all for deporting people who are here illegally, but let's make sure that we do it with a due process, and let's make sure that we don't turn our government and give them permission and cheer them on when they act like thugs, like massed, militarized thugs. And that's what

ICE is right now. US District Judge Charles Bryer ruled last month the Trump's deployment of federal troops in La, which began in June, was illegal and harkened back to Britain's use of soldiers for law enforcement purposes in colonial America. He warned that Trump clearly intends to transform the National Guard into a presidential police force. Congress spoke clearly in eighteen seventy eight when it passed some pots to Commitatus Act prohibiting the use of the US military to execute

domestic laws at Bryar. Nearly one hundred and forty years later, defendants Trump and Hegseth and the Department of Defense deployed the National Guard of Marines to La ostensibly to quell a rebellion and sure the federal immigration law was enforced. Yet there was no rebellion, nor was civilian law enforcement

unable to respond to protests to enforce the law. The judge rule that the Pentagon had systematically used armed soldiers to perform police functions in California and violation of posse commatatis, as he put it. Trump and Secretary Hegseth have stated their intention to call National Guard troops and the Federal Service in other cities across the country, thus creating a national police force with the president as its chief. This, conservatives and MAGA people, is why there was the no

King protests across the country. It didn't have anything to do with Soros. I'm not saying to don anything to do it. He can fund it, just like he got people funding a Charlie Kirk's organization. Nevertheless, this is the reason you're fooling yourself if you're telling yourself it was Soros. In the face of that scathing opinion, the president has nonetheless ramped up as urban military occupations while threatening to

launch yet more of them. Now we're in Memphis, now we're going to Chicago, Trump told a large crowd of sailors in Norfolk, Virginia. And so we send in the National Guard, We send in whatever's necessary. People don't care. Yeah I could. Yeah. His people don't care what he does. They give him a pass. As October began, trumpet already deployed an unprecedented a number of roughly thirty five thousand federal troops. I just want to say, you know, think

about this. That's why I opposed Steve pa Chennik and Alex Jones at the very beginning on this staying stuff. He said, Yeah, we got twenty thousand troops out there, and they're arresting people right now because we put out blockchain watermark ballots and we're tracking them with quantum computers. It was all one piece of BS after the other. And I said, you know, if you got twenty thousand troops out there, people would know that there's no way that you could cover it. And so just think about

what's happening with this. When military troops police civilians, we have an intolerable threat to individual liberty and the foundational values of this country, said the director of the ACLU's National Security Project. Trump And again, I hate to say that I'm on the same side as the ACLU. Sometimes they do support civil liberties, but most often they don't.

Trump may want to normalize armed forces in our cities, but no matter what uniform they wear, federal agents and military troops are bound by the Constitution and have to respect our rights to peaceful assembly, freedom of speech, and due process. State and local leaders must stay strong and take all lawful measures to protect residents against this cruel intimidation tactic, which is what it is. There is no national security threat in Portland's of the Governor of Oregon.

Our communities are safe and calm, and again we saw that with the no Kings protest that was there. After the governor conveyed that to Trump and a phone call, the President seemed to briefly question whether he had been misled about an Antifah siege quote unquote there and the city being as he said, war ravaged, and as the governor Recounty said, I spoke to the Sorry, Trump said, I spoke to the governor, but I said, well, wait a minute, and I'm watching things on TV. They're different

from what's happening. My people tell me Differently. Days later, despite countless reports there was neither a war nor a siege underway in Portland, Trump posted on social media that cotech of the governor was living in a dream world, and he returned to peddling lies about the city. He said Portland is a never ending disaster. He said, we're going in because as American patriots, we all uppercase have no choice. Law and order must prevail in our cities

and everywhere else. Such a cynical liar, the guy who trashes the constitution, who disobeys every single law and taunts people and to some try to stop me when I do this, and he says he has no choice because he's got to obey the law to go in and do it. He's disobeyed the Constitution, Posse Commatatus Act and many others, just like he had a pretend pandemic, and he said, I have no choice. Trump's living in a dream world. Actually it's a nightmare. And these are all

emergencies that he just dreamed up. Judge Karen Immergoot that he appointed, put in the temporary restraining order sixty day restraining order about Portland. Trump immediately took aim at her, despite the fact that she had been appointed by him to office, saying that she ought to be ashamed of herself. Then he claimed, without any basis that Portland was quote burning to the ground unquote. Trump then may aid further hyperbolic claims about the city and threatened to invoke the

Insurrection Act. Portland is on fire, he said. Portland's been on fire for years, he said, describing the situation as quote all insurrection. Yet, you know, Trump in twenty twenty did absolutely nothing when cities were burning. Earlier this month, Trump signed an executive order claiming to designate Antifah as a domestic terror organization. We have to take care of this little net that's on our shoulder called the Democrats, he said as he spoke during the Navy's two and

fiftieth anniversary celebration. This guy is literally sounding like Adolf Hitler. This childish rhetoric, isn't he. The Trump administration has also admitted that he's waging a secret war against undisclosed enemies

without the consent of Congress. Brian fun Yukan, a former State Department lawyer a specialist encounter terrorism issues as well as laws of war, pointed out that the White Houses claim that Trump has the authority to use lethal force against anyone that he decides is a member of a domestic terrorist organization is extraordinarily dangerous and destabilizing, he said, Because there's no articulated limiting principles, the President could simply

use this prerogative to kill any people he labeled as terrorists. He could use it at home in the United States, and we already see him doing this in Venezuela. He doesn't need any proof, and when he does it, you'll have maga idiots creating little jingles to cheer him on the Trump administration's military occupations of American cities, This deployment of tens of thousands of troops across the US, it's

the emerging framework for designating and targeting domestic enemies. It's dehumanization of political foes, and its assertion that the president has the right to wage secret war and summarily execute those he deems to be terrorists have left this country

on the precipice of authoritarian rule. With Trump attempting to fashion a presidential police force of armed soldiers for domestic employment while claiming the right to kill anyone he deems to be a terrorist, the threat to the rule of law in the US is not just profound, but historically unprecedented. And again, to go back to what Madison said, he said, the weapons of defense abroad will be brought home as

tools of tyranny at home. And so when you look at the fact that they have lied about enemies and what people are doing abroad, when they have created coups and overthrown governments, what makes you think that they won't do all of that stuff here. Trump is building a shadowy, violent federal police force, says Pro Publica and again, we go back to this pastor who again, as I said, you look at what this guy has done. He's focused on Black Lives matter. He has desecrated his church and

decimated it actually with his political activism. Nevertheless, he has a right to protest.

hits that were intended for me. Within two minutes, quite a number of ICE officers, maybe fifteen, maybe twenty rushed out of the gate and began to shove us down, and I was already disabled on the ground, but attempted to get away, and they continued to shove us in a kettling maneuver towards a place where we would not

be able to escape. And you can see in that video Ice officers shoving protesters who were standing and speaking and chanting and singing peacefully and praying peacefully, shoving us down and then dispensing a huge amount of chemical weapons onto us. We could hear them laughing as they were shooting us from the roof, and it was deeply disturbing.

We've gotten to witness a few things about these ICE agents operating in Broadview, and really what it has shown us is how disorganized they are and how poorly supervised and trained they are. We've also heard ICE agents talking to each other, one of whom said, man, I don't even remember why I'm here anymore, and the other said

I don't know either. So there's a deep demoralization that we are seeing as we're bringing this peaceful and spiritual protest against their tactics and what they're doing to our city and our communities and our neighbors.

cheering this kind of stuff. It's never justified to initiate that kind of force. When immigration and custom enforcement officers stormed through Santa Anna, California, in June, panicked calls flooded into the city's emergency response system. Recordings of those calls obtained by Pro Publica captured some of the terror that residents felt as they watched mask men ambush people and forced them into unmarked cars. In some cases, the men

wore plain clothes and refused to identify themselves. There was no way to confirm whether they were immigration agents or impostors, and six of the calls to Santa Anna police residents described what they were seeing as kidnappings. He's bleeding, said one caller about a person he saw yank from a car a car wash lot and beaten. They dumped him into a white van. It doesn't say ice. One woman's voice shook as she asked what kind of police go

around without license? Police? Then from another should we just run from them? During a tense public meeting days later, the mayor and the city council asked their police chief whether there was anything they could do to reign in the federal agents, even if only to ban the use of masks. The answer was a resounding no. Plus filing complaints with the Department of Homeland Security was likely to go nowhere because the office that once handled them has

been dismantled. There was little chance of holding individual agents accountable for the alleged abuses because, among other hurdles, there was no way to reliably learn their identities. That's why they're wearing a mask. Since then, the mayor said that she has reluctantly accepted the reality there are virtually no limits on what federal agents can do to achieve Trump's goal of mass deportations. And look, I share his goal

of mass deportations, but the means matter. You can't just do it anyway you want, just like you can't shoot people on the street because you suspect them and being drug dealers, and you can't blow people out of the water. Legally, he can do it. He can kill people, but you know, hopefully he will be a reckoning in this life for that kind of stuff there is for Robert Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines.

These people want to say that none of this stuff is happening unless Sours is giving them money. They would argue with me incessantly when I told them that Trump was incentivizing with massive financial bribery, the mass murder of people and hospitals with ventilators and with remdesevir and other things like that. One former DHS official senior who was involved in oversight, said, what is happening on American streets today gives me goosebumps. Speaking on condition of anonymity for

fear of retaliation. There we go, right, what's that telling you, he said, accosting people outside their immigration court hearings where they're showing up and trying to do the right thing, then hauling them off to an immigration jail in the middle of the country where they can't access loved ones

or speak to council. Bands of masked men, apprehending people on broad daylight in the streets and hauling them off, disappearing people to a third country, to a prison where there's no documented record of serious to torture and human rights abuse. He said, We're at an inflection point in

history right now, and it's frightening. And you know, this is why this guy was the named kilmar Garcia whatever that they picked up the response, you know, when they did this kind of stuff to him and people called him out on the fact they denied him due process, the Trump administration starts giving us nonsense about look, he's got MS thirteen when they photoshopped it on the picture.

You know, he's got tattoos on his knuckles, which are not MS thirteen tattoos MS thirteen people when they tattooed themselves. They want you to know that they're MS thirteen. They typically use that gang symbols and they're very explicit about it. This was just a different tattoo and the MS thirteen that was written on top of it that Trump claimed was really written on his hand. That was something people photoshopped in very obvious to everybody that it was photoshopped.

They could have this is how stupid the Trump administration is. They could have, and they should have talked about the fact that he was arrested in Tennessee and he was

trafficking people. He was driving the car that belonged to somebody who had been convicted of trafficking people, and he had something like eight to nine people in his car, all of them were illegal aliens with no identification, and the Tennessee Highway Patrol pulled him over, and the Biden ice people at the time said let him go, and they didn't talk about that, even though you had the local Tennessee papers were talking about that. Trump administration is

too stupid to pick up on that. They should have made it about that, but they should have also given him due process before they deported him out of the country. Instead, Their whole thing was to say, yeah, but what about the fact that he's this or he's that, and missed the relevant facts that were there because they don't really care. Former official paused and said, we're an inflection point in history right now, and it's frightening. The identities of DHS officers.

Listen to this. I have a real problem with this, and I didn't know this. The identities of Department Homeland Security officers, their salaries, their operations have long been withheld national security right for security reason. This is, as I said, national security has been the thing that they wave in front of everybody's face whenever they want to do something that's secret and illegal, and whenever they want to violate the law, they just say that it's for national security.

And did you know that the identities of DHS cannot be known. They are exempted from disclosure from Foyer requests. You can't find out the salaries that people are paid. You can't find out names or anything about what they did. You can't say, well, I'd like to have some information about this action that they did. All of Homeland security stuff is declared as secret and secure, just like they

were the CIA or something. So of course they're going to turn into the CIA when you give people exemptions like that. So the issue was that we were told, you know, just like FISA Court. Well, you know, these guys can do anything they want to, and we need to have them looking at foreign spies. So will create this FISA court and that will be the oversight. Well, they created inside Homeland Security since they were going to hide everything that Homeland Security did and who all the

Homeland Security people were. They're going to hide all that from you. They're secret agents of the government. Just think about this, this agency that was created in response to the nine to eleven false flag mass murdered by our own government of its own citizens. And then they create Homeland Security and then everybody that's in it is all protected as if it's some kind of classified government secret.

And so they tell people, well, don't worry, we're going to have a special office where you can ask that office and they will do the investigation. As if that was going to really work. Well, Trump shut that down one of the first things he did. What does that tell you, Well, Pro Publica thinks that tells us a lot.

This administration has gutted the office. What's left of It was led, at least for a while by a twenty nine year old White House appointee who helped to craft Project twenty twenty five, the right wing blueprint that broadly calls for the curtailment of civil rights enforcement and so DHS is secret and the organization that was supposed to hold them accountables within it has now been purged by the Trump administration. Ice their secret police is their tool.

They have that now and there's nothing stopping them from using it against citizens. And so raw story, which again is on the left, says Trump is preparing a coup. The evidence is clear if you know where to look. I believe that Trump is preparing a coup against the Constitution, citing the removal of senior military lawyers and the tightening of press access to the Pentagon as evidence of the plan. Is the US military already in the early stages of

a Trump led against our constitution? Well, you know, when you just shred it bit by bit, that in and of itself is a coup against the Constitution. Inside the Pentagon, loyalty is being elevated above law. As Pete Hegseith quietly removes senior military lawyers, the very officials meant to uphold legality and restraint and replaces them with loyalists. Well, again, loyalty elevated above the law. Isn't that what Trump did in twenty twenty. Isn't that what Biden did subsequent to that?

Because of all the JAB stuff. Right for the military, for instance, you're going to take the JAB because we say that you're going to take the job. And I don't care if I've got the legal authority to do that or not. I want you. I want to know if you are loyal to the military, and if you will inject an untested vaccine just on my orders. If you're not loyal enough to do that, even though I have no legal authority to make you do that, I'm going to kick you out of the military. The purge

also happened to senior military leadership. They think, perhaps again it's this Admiral Holsey who steps down, and we don't know the reason. He has not said why he's leaving. It could be a continuation of the troubling trend of purges of highly qualified officers who have been inquined to restrain Trump's illegal, fascistic impulses. The bureaucracy is This is the deliberate dismantling of the safeguards that have been within

the military. So it's not just within Homeland Security, where we had the office that was supposed to oversee things because everything is secret to us in terms of homeland security, but it's also the JAG Corp. The JAG people, the Judge Advocate generals are supposed to advise commanders on the rule of law, including whether presidential orders are legal. Without these independent military lawyers backing them up, commanders have no

recourse other than to comply or to resign. And that's why many people are wondering what happened to this admiral. At the Washington Post, David Ignatius asks why the military has not spoken out against Trump's attacks on these boats off the coast of Venezuela and what some characterized as his unconstitutional deployment of troops against American civilians. He answered his own question by saying that Trump has been has gutted the Judge Advocate generals as well. They are the

institutional safeguard against unlawful orders. They advised commanders on rules of engagement, on the Geneva Conventions, and on the limits of presidential authority. And at the very beginning of this, when he blew up that first boat, you had several former heads of JAG under many different presidents, Republican and Democrat, who came forward and talked to the press and said,

what he is doing is clearly illegal. It's a violation of military policy in the US, it's violation of the Constitution, it's a violation of international law. When administration starts purging these types of people, we're not looking at routine personnel shuffle. We're seeing a careful dismantling of the guardrails that prevent America's military from being weaponized against the American people. And again, the sclip I played for you last week.

legal advice. His personal not his military lawyer who defended him against sexual abuse allegations. Tim Parleteur has been involved in this process, wielding influence over how rules of engagement

are interpreted and how internal discipline is handled. The Secretary has transformed the Pentagon Press controls as well, and under these new rules, similar to the way the Kremlin operates, reporters are required to sign pledges stating that they won't gather or use unauthorized material even if it's unclassified, or they risk losing their Pentagon credentials if they stray. The policy also limits reporter mobility within the Pentagon and curtail's

direct contact with personnel unless escorted. So think about that, you know, even if they're not talking about getting something that's classified, they're saying, if this is unclassified information, you don't report it unless you get an okay from me, And so they're putting restrictions on them. As they point out, it's very much like what the Kremlin had. Only one

American news agreed to this. The Pentagon Press Association declined to sign it and warn that these rules constitute a disturbing situation intended to limit leaks and to suppress accountability. So put all of these moves together and a frightening pattern emerges. Purge independent legal advisors who might say no,

gag the press before the damage can be exposed. Combine that with increasingly aggressive unilateral action by the military abroad, and you have the outlines of a strategy for bypassing democratic oversight, a Trump forced coup. In other words, Wednesday, the US Navy again struck what Trump claims was a drug trafficking vessel off Venezuela, reportedly killing six people, and I think since that time he has reportedly sunk a He said it was a drug submarine that they sunk.

When you remove internal legal descent and public scrutiny, the threshold to use force becomes dangerously low. The domestic implications are equally chilling. Trump has publicly said that he wants to use US cities as training grounds for troops and openly declared that he would fire any general who fails to show total loyalty. A want to be dictator can't deploy troops into American neighborhoods if he still has jags saying that's not legal, or if he has a press

corp that is reporting on where they go. First, he has to make sure there are no internal breaks and no public witnesses, and that's how coups are built. Defenders will argue that this is about efficiency, about correcting an overly cautious JAG culture, or about closing leaks, but that's clearly a lie. Real reform would emphasize transparent standards, not loyalty tests. If the JAG Corps must be reformed, it should be done by independent committees, not by one political

operator who is calling the shots. Make no mistake, this is not abstract. JAG officers are a bulwark against unlawful war, against war crimes, and against the misuse of force at home. Silencing and replacing them is not the act of a healthy republic. It's the early work of an authoritarian takeover. Combine that with the GAG orders and the purge of senior military leadership that might resist Trump's illegal moves, and we're watching the architecture of a strong man art autocracy

being assembled peace by peace and folks. That autocracy is going to be used by both the left and the right. They both want that of the people at the top, and the useful idiots at the bottom are cheering it on when their guy does it. A military coup doesn't typically happen in one dramatic moment, even though it appears that way. When it reaches a climax, it begins through personnel decisions, institutional erosion, secrecy, and incremental normalization of power.

The moment the legal council course stops buffering against against rash orders, the moment the press is muzzled, the path darkens.

And we're closer to that moment than many, including though many across our media realize or are willing to acknowledge, what's happening right now might not look like a coup to the average American, but it is unmistakably the preparation for one, in the same way that Trump prepared us for universal basic income, the same way that he prepared us to be locked down and to lose our jobs, our homes, our farms, our businesses because we could not would not be allowed to work.

an American citizen issues narrating it. Leo Martinez is an immigration rights volunteer in California. Oh well that's it for the right, they say, no more, he's against us, right. He wants these people to stay here, the illegal aliens, to stay here, So we don't care what ICE does to him. That's what you're going to get from the right. Look, I don't want to leave the people who were brought who are allowed to come in under Biden, under Trump,

under Obama. I don't think that they should be allowed to stay here and to get welfare, but I don't want to see this kind of action. He was driving through the neighborhood monitoring ICE activity, which he'd been doing for months before that. The agents have been involved with the ICE raids, knew who he was, and you know, when I look at this, I see and I'll give you some of the responses from people on the right. Oh, he had it coming. You know, he's out there trying

to film the ICE agents doing what they're doing. It's like, well, why wouldn't you want to know if they are exceeding their legal authority with this stuff. It's very much like what cop watch does, right, You've had an organization that encourages people to record the cops and what they're doing to keep them in line and to make sure that they don't go over the line, and then the cops will frequently turn on them. In this case, everything was different.

Agents rammed his truck then took him into custody. The incident ignited outrage and protests because he's an American citizen, and so Aaron Burnett had him on and she said, you have dash cam footage of all the time leading up to that actual moment as well ice agents in the suv. You then sort of seem to be driving in circles and we can watch this. Can you explain to me why that's happening? He said, yeah, this is the first time in all the months so we've been doing this

that the agents turned on us. Being legal observers, we keep our distance, we keep our safe distance to keep tabs on what they're at. But this is the first time they turned their aggression towards us and really started coming after us. So that's something new. I was trying

to stay away from them. That's why we were moving in circles, because they kept following me and moving towards me, and once they hit me, I knew that it was Well, it was a new ballgame, and we're going to have to deal with this a little differently in the future, because now they have no problem with they're already pulling guns on us. They've already done a multitude of things, but one thing is coming after us in their vehicles

and hitting them with a vehicle. So again, do we have a right to observe and to record what the police are doing in our society? You better believe we do. They record everything about us. We're not supposed to know anything about them. Everything about homeland security is classified. You can't know anything about it. They're like the CIA and

the NSA, and that is ripe for abuse. And so this is Andrew Colvett, who is with Charlie Kirk's group TPUSA, and he says, this guy Martinez is part of a large network of people in Ventore County, California who surveill and harass federal agents. Get over it, Get over it, come on there, photograph And I've seen this with Cop Watch over and over again. You show up and you're shooting them from a distance. What they're doing on video is that you're harassing us, and they pick a fight

aggressively with people. This is what's really happening. I can't believe this when you got conservatives making excuses for this. Cops need to be watched, right. It's kind of going back to what Madison said, and he said, well, because they're not angels, we need to have government. But because the government is going to be composed of men, we need to be very careful about that. And for the

longest time, people said, who watches the watchers. Well, these are people who watch the watchers, and when the watchers start attacking the people who are watching them, you know they're up to something. Stalkers like Martinez says, this guy at TPUSA are actively endangering ICE agents by sharing their location with others and impeding federal law enforcement, which is a crime. Arrest them. Yeah, well I agree with that strongly.

Trump's ICE has started targeting activists, not just immigrants. This is from the Three Thought Project. It's actually originally from Truth Out. ICE demanded that Facebook meta hand over personal information attached to Instagram accounts that track immigration raids. Yeah, we're not allowed to look at all at what our secret police are doing, are we? The police state bounty hunters. The rise of ICE's unconstitutional war on America, And this

is from John Whitehead at the Rutherford Institute. You'll find it also on Free Thought Project. Masked gunmen, tasers, tear gas, pepper spray on marked vehicles, intimidation tactics, brutality, racial profiling, children, traumatized families, ter rise journalists, targeted citizens, detained disabled individuals, miners, the elderly, pregnant women, military veterans snatched off the street, private property destroyed. This is not a war zone. This

is America. This is what now passes for law and order. As TPUSA would say, policing by ICE agents in Trump's America, it is not making America safer or greater. What began as an agency task with enforcing immigration laws is now

metastasized into a domestic terror force. That's right, problem and solutions what it was all about are They're going to use this problem that they created of mass migration to argue for digital ideas, argue for secret police, argue to throw out all the rules of restraint and the rule of law from coast to coast. Ice goon squads, incognito thugish fueled by profit driven incentives and outlandish quotas, are empowered by the Trump administration to act as if they

are untouchable. They're prowling neighborhoods, church courthouses, hospitals, bus stops, work sites, anywhere suspected migrants might be present, snatching people first and asking questions later. Journalists are being shoved into the payment, forced into choke holes, tear gased, brutalized in violation of the First Amendment, US citizens, including toddlers, are being snatched up and carted off in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which is what we saw right away at

the beginning in Chicago. This is not public safety. It is domestic terrorism carried out by masked, militarized, lawless bounty hunters. In California, ICE agents stopped a US citizen and a military veteran on his way to work. According to George Reta's, agents fired tear gas, broke his car window, and applied

physical force, including kneeling, on him. He spent three days in federal custody with no charges, no call to his family, no access to a judge or to an attorney, no shower, and no explanation for ICE's actions before they just released him. They will never mind. In Portland, a US citizen outside his workplace was detained by masked plain clothes agents. Refused to identify themselves. They threatened him with a dog, They handcuffed him, They hauled him away in an unmarked vehicle,

and kept him for hours without justification. In Chicago, a local TV journalist was violently knocked to the ground by masked agents, handcuffed, arrested, hauled to a detention center, then released without charges. In La ICE agents handcuffed and detained a twenty three year old, heavily pregnant woman for over eight hours with a chain around her belly, accusing the native born American of being from Mexico. They bruised and bruised and in labor. She went straight to the hospital

upon release. Two sisters were stopped outside of school, surrounded by at least ten ICE agents who broke into their locked vehicle, dragged them out and pinned them to the ground. Both women were later released without explanation. Each of these incidents is presented as a routine immigration enforcement, yet collectively they reveal a government agency that has abandoned the principles of restraint, accountability, and due process in favor of brute force.

They're thugs. This has been going on, he says, for a while, but under Trump, things have gotten much worse. The rationalizations have become bolder, the violence has become more normalized, and the lies are more transparent. And the biggest lie of all is that the Department of Homeland Security claim that this unnecessary military invasion of Chicago, Operation Midway Blitz, that it rounded up the worst of the worst pedophiles,

child abusers, kidnappers, gang members, and armed robbers. How many times have you seen that that lie from Trump has been repeated over and over again. Well, here's the truth about it from John Whitehead. He said, the data shows that out of a thousand people that they rounded up, only ten had criminal records. Right, that is one percent, So not even one Yeah, that's one percent. When Donald Trump campaigned, he said he was going after criminals, rapists,

and drug dealers. Now they are assaulting women, deporting children, mothers and fathers, not even criminals. And if they're criminals, they need to prove it. We haven't seen that evidence yet, said one Chicago resident. Well, again, you know, people who are here illegally are committing a crime. But again, I don't think that I think there needs to be restraint. I think there needs to be proportionality, and there absolutely

has to be due process in all of this. Nationally, more than seventy percent of individuals rounded up by ICE have no criminal convictions. Many have lived in the US for decades, raised families, paid taxes, contributed to the economy, and worked the jobs that Americans refused to do. Well, yes and no, but still the bottom line is that

he wants to make everybody into a terrorist. And in Chicago, out of a thousand people that they got one percent at a criminal record, and overall only thirty percent of them have a criminal record. Seventy percent do not.

in the actual jails. When they arrest someone, they then see if they're a citizen or not, and if they aren't a citizen, they don't just let them go, they hand them over to ICE. That would be the logical way to do it.

guns and old ladies' faces. Why don't you when somebody commits a crime, make them do the time. But as John White had said, clearly, this is not about crime, it's not about safety, and it's not about jobs. As a matter of fact, what about those small farms that Trump's tariffs are killing. No, it's not about that at all. So what is really driving this campaign to terror. What we're witnessing is the weaponization of fear. This is a spectacle of domination. It is part de turrent, part distraction,

and all political theater. Just like that meme that he put out. The Trump administration has just announced his fifth military strike on Venezuela and vessel that it claims, withoutvidence, was engaged in illegal activity. The propaganda might scream about foreign threats, but these spectacles serve a different purpose to divert public outrage away from falling poll numbers, a faltering economy, and a growing unrest over the regime's corruption and incompetence

at home. Ice rays perform the same functions as those boat strikes do abroad. They keep the public frightened, and they keep the camera fixed on the wrong enemy. Meanwhile, with scandals that should command national attention, the Epstein files that implicate powerful elites, the graft, the insider enrichment, all of those sink beneath the noise. This is not about

border control law enforcement. It's about control period. When a political regime begins to equate its own survival with a nation's survival, every citizen becomes a potential suspect in every act of dissent, a potential crime. ICE's strategy is predatory and liberate. When ICE agents hunt people the way one might hunt animals in the wild, they cease to be officers of the law and they become moving packs of lawless predators, lawless paid predators. That is yeah, That's why

I refer to them as the feral government. The government has gone wild. It has gone feral as a matter of fact. In addition to recruiting ICE agents with fifty thousand dollars signing bonuses and sixty thousand dollars in student loan forgiveness, DHS is also promising to lavishly reward police agencies that allow their officers to operate as extensions of ICE with salary reimbursements, overtime pay, and monthly bonuses. Does

this look familiar? Does this look like the same thing that Trump did when he paid the hospitals to kill people with ventilators and rem deservir the rest of the stuff. You point at somebody and say they've got COVID to fulfill my narrative, then I'll give you a twenty percent bonus on everything you do. These people in the hospital. He's doing the same thing with this. You help us and to push this narrative that I've got out there that city's on fire. Maybe you set the fires right,

and I'll give you big bonuses. I'll give you a fifty thousand dollars signing bonus if you come on board sixty thousand in student loan forgiveness. Then there's the Trump administration's directive to ice to carry out a minimum of three thousand arrests a day. No wonder that citizens, lawful residents, and immigrants with no criminal history getting swept up. There

simply aren't enough violent criminals to fill these quotas. And so you know, when we look at this that fifty thousand dollars signing bonus is kind of interesting, isn't it, Because there's been a lot of back and forth with people. You had the back and forth with Stephanofflis and JD. Vance. Stephanofflis asking JD. Vance a lot over and over again. Did he take a bag of fifty thousand dollars in cash? Did he take it or not? Did he turn that in?

Did he pay taxes on it? Yes? Or no? And JD. Vansel, you know, he does business with things that he's like, yeah, how many people out there? How many of you out there except grocery bags of cash for your business payments out there? Come on, something is up with that. If you go back and you look at Spiro Agnew, I think he only got like ten thousand dollars or something and cash delivered in a suitcase when he was vice president.

Actually it was just before it was just before he became vice president in the election run off, and that's when this happened. With Tom Homan. It was in the run up to becoming you know, being put into his position that he was given that fifty thousand dollars in cash, and the FBI said it was a bribe, and they were going after him, and then the Trump administration shut it down. So therefore, since the Trump administration's FBI, which we all know is beyond reproach, right, Cash Betel always

tells us the truth. He always does everything legally right. And so if they shut down this investigation of somebody who is very key in the Trump administration, then of course the guy is innocent. We have to believe, except I don't believe that. And so you have this back and forth. They constantly evade it. They won't say that, why he took it, who he took it from, did he declare it, did he pay taxes on it? What is going on with all this? And then we had

another aspect of this. This is Bill O'Reilly was interviewing Tom Homan and asked Tom Holman himself, and he was just as evasive as jd Vance listened to what he had to say.

So I cleared myself day one. Well, people don't talk about as I took a significant, huge pay cut to come back and serve my nation, and I'm not enriching myself doing this job.

how to distinguish between just and unjust laws. He said, I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. And I would agree with Saint Augustine that an unjust law is no law at all. Now, what is the difference between the two. How does one determine whether law is just or unjust? A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral

law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with a moral law. And put in terms of Saint Thomas Aquinas, an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted an eternal law or natural law. Any law that uplips human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust. We all understand that. I mean we all looked with contempt at the Nuremberg excuse saying I was just following orders. It's like, well, you should have never followed orders to

do that. And so there is a higher law. There is a moral law that even people who don't believe in God understand that is the natural law. And we all understand that things like murder are wrong. We don't understand, all of us that going five miles or over the speed limit is wrong. That's as an example of man made regulations versus eternal unjust laws. And so Whitehead says, legality and morality are not always the same. A nation that abandons moral law will soon find itself without any

law at all. And that's the key thing. You know, we've had this back and forth about Romans thirteen with Christians. You know, you have a lot of very successful people who have a lot of access and connections to the government telling you that you've got to do whatever the government says. During the pandemic stuff, we had Todd Freele saying that if the government, and this is right, immediately before they were going to start mandating the vaccine as

a condition of jobs. And he says, if the government tells you to wear a pinwheel on your head, you wear a pinwheel on your head. So I call him pinwill freel because you are not obligated to do that. That is a horrible perversion of Romans thirteen. When the government is set against God, you know, you go back and look at it. Why do the nation's rage against the law Lord and is anointed as Christ right? And they constantly, the nations, the governments of this world, have

set themselves against God. And when they do that, you are not bound to obey them. As a matter of fact, you are bound to resist them. A government that claims pregnant women, that change pregnant women, that assaults journalists, that detains citizens without cause, has lost its moral authority to govern a law. A government that abandons moral law will soon find itself without any law at all. That's right. We have a king already and it is the law.

Trump doesn't want king constitution. That's the real issue here. Ice does not protect America. It terrorizes America, and until it is reigned and dismantled or reformed to operate within the constitutional boundaries, it will remain a standing army on domestics, sol oil, unaccountable, unconstitutional, Unamerican tyranny always cloaks itself in the language of welfare and safety. Constitutional abuse transcends party lines. We have seen this from both left and right, Democrat

and Republican. The Constitution is not a suggestion. It is the rule of law and ice, and by extension, DHS and the entire Trump regime cannot operate within those limits. If they can't, then it must hide behind masks and behind military might to exercise its power. Then it has to cease to be lawful. It has become exactly what the frameans of the Constitution feared, a government that wages

war on its own people. And so, you know, I thought an interesting side story of this was the fact that in California, there it's this fight between Newsom and Vance. They wanted to on the No King's Day. It also turned out to be the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the Marine Corps, and so they decided they were going to shoot artillery over the California Freeway that day. I thought, okay, well, is that just a coincidence or is this something that's being done for intimidation? So was

it intimidation or was it celebration of the marine anniversary? Well, you know, maybe it was both. Because we've seen over and over again, haven't we when you have a lot of you know, you have back and forth in a couple of countries. We have seen our own government run up massive military training exercises. Of course other governments have

done it as well. That is done to intimidate as a show of force and say, well, it's just a training exercise and we do this all the time, and that's right they do, but many times they use those training exercises for intimidation. I think it was both of those things. I think it was a celebration of training exercise, and I think it was also intimidation. So they said, yeah, we fire artillery shelves over the freeway all the time,

and we don't have a problem with that. So I don't know, I just I look at it a little bit differently. I think the comments we've got, yeah, we've.

Servants can hide ID, but we can't claim the Fourth Amendment skun call the Rose Gardens cops should not look like that much, right, GDP three point thirty. Governments create the problem or release they're propaganda to instill fear and anger, then implement they're ready to go solution quote unquote that erodes our freedoms and gives them more power. And Max I used.

conducted by the Department of Education. They dragged the husband and the kids out on the front lawn face down, you know, like something out of Brazil again. And the mother who owed the student loan had left the family and they couldn't be bothered to do that. But that's you know, they'll do it for any of these agencies are capable. They're armed and capable of doing this. That's what's so dangerous about this, folks. This is not simply

about legal or illegal aliens or whatever. This is about accruing that power, setting that precedent so that these different bureaucracies can do whatever they wish.

Why don't the FEDS get him for that? Like the al Capone? He is at heart real. Jason Barker nine to eleven opened the floodgates of corruption and money laundering. I didn't see it till I was in the mix with contractors in Afghanistan.

which Jduvans refused to answer. Well, if he didn't take the money, why couldn't he say that? And I have a real question about this. So you know, we hear now from Tom Homan that he didn't take any money, but evidently there's a recording out there of him taking the money. So that story mains an open question.

on his way to the hearing. I believe that he was just a He was just a red hearing to get the MAGA people to cheer this and say, look, we're winning. And then they moved him out of the way and put her in place. Then there was a I think a personal conflict between her and rf K Junior. So she's gone. I don't think rf K Junior released got rid of her because of her connection with BARTA and with ARPA H and all these other dark agencies that are out there trying to create bioweapons to be

us used against us. It really looks bad. What's there. We're gonna take a quick break.

of the George Santos pardon. But we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. Stay with us.

a commutation. Big difference. I said, well, I'm not so sure that it is such a big difference. You know he's gonna wear that conviction. Yes, I said, yeah, a pardon is what he did to Jared Kushner's dad, and said, I'll leave it up to you to go back and see his crimes that are out there. But again I also misspelled. I did it hastily, and I looked at it and well, I'm not going to go back and change it from pardon to commutation. I also misspelled George's name.

I'm surprised the guy didn't creak me on that, you know, little grammar Nazi. But anyway, he served less than three months on his fraud conviction. And so the question is what is this about. Well, Trump said he was suffering horrible conditions, that he was in solitary confinement and so forth. Did Trump care about that when he passed on the pardons for Ross Elbrick or many other people who were

out there. I mean, there was one person after the other that people are begging him to pardon in twenty twenty, when he gave the pardon to Jared Kushner's criminal father. Did he care when he left the J sixers out there to hang. No, he didn't care about any of that, So I don't buy the humanitarian angle at all. I think he's up to something. I mean, it might be that he's preparing people for this Glene Maxwell things, saying hey, I just hate to see people suffer in prison. You know,

that's just who I am. It might also be that he's trying to district people's attention on the no King's Day and saying, yeah, I'm a king and I can pardon people. So forth. I said, yeah, I said, you know, this person said he wasn't pardon his sentence was commuted. I said, I'll leave it up to you to read what Jared's dad did. That's pardon was what he gave him.

Porters that have been covering Santos since twenty twenty two, they broke the news that he had lied extensively about his resume Former Representative George Santos to New York the disgraced Republican fabuloust. His lies made him an object to nationalist scorn. Was he basically owns that term fabulous. They have used it so many times over him. He's just a liar. He's just a liar who makes up fables. In that regard he and Trump are in the same place.

I guess that's maybe Trump can identify with him because they're both fabulousts. He was released from federal prison after Trump commuted his seven year sentence for fraud. He only served three months. He said, George has been in solitary confinement for long stretches of time. By all accounts, he has been horribly mistreated. Therefore, I just signed a commutation releasing Santos from prison immediately. Good luck, George, have a great life. Well you know again, you look at Marty Gottisfeld.

Marty did nothing to harm anyone, and he was put under horrific conditions in prison and left to rot there, just like Ross Olbrick was and many others when Trump passed over them. Santos serve fewer than three months of his eighty seven month sentence, and he will no longer be required to pay more than three hundred and seventy

thousand dollars in court ordered restitution to his victims. According to a copy of the commutation posted online by the US Pardon Attorney, the commutation does not wipe out his conviction, but, as part of a blitz of grants, a political clemency that Trump has doled out to his political allies or other figures. And I think it is preparing the way for a Maxwell pardon. When he first went his seat in twenty twenty two, Santos was heralded as a sign

of a shift in Republican politics. Young Brazilian American, openly gay, Santos seemed to signal an expansion of the GOP's tent. Yeah, that's right, you know, that's what they're all about. So Charlie Kirk was all about opening up the tent for gay people in order to fight the cultural war. Right got to ask which side is he gone? And then you got Scott Pressler, the long haired homosexual who's going around. He's now kind of he's this young guy like Charlie Kirk.

And so because he's young, and because he's homosexual, and he's a great outreach for the Republican Party, that's what they have become. His victory in a Democrat leaning district in Long Island was celebrated for helping Republicans narrowly win control of the House. He claimed that he was descended from Holocaust refugees. Remember he came back and said well, I didn't say I was Jewish. I said I'm Jewish. His mother, he said, had been the World Trade Center

on September eleventh, two thousand and one. He claimed to be a college volleyball star, and he boasted of having an extensive Wall Street experience that allowed him to report loaning his campaign hundreds of thousands of dollars and none of that was true. In other words, he's just like Trump. I can see that Trump can identify with this guy because everything that he says is a lie. And it's not only just a lie, but it's a fabulous lie.

Santas' claims were exposed to be faults from misleading, and when he was indicted in twenty twenty three, prosecutors accused him of multiple criminal schemes, ranging from fraudulently claiming unemployment benefits and lying on official forms, to using his political campaign to enrich himself, swindling money from donors for personal expenses, using one donor's credit card to steal eleven thousand dollars

for his personal use. After congressional ethics investigation found Santos and properly spent campaign funds on Botox designer fashion cosmetics. And only fans purchases. More than one hundred Republicans joined Democrats to expel him from Congress in December twenty twenty three. He became the first person in history to be expelled from the House without being convicted of a federal crime

or of supporting the Confederacy. Santos, who had for more than a year denied all wrongdoing, pleaded guilty in his criminal case his senacing. At his sentencing, the acting US Attorney at the time decried his conviction as a warning to mister Santos and other dishonest individuals of that ilk who lie steel identities commit frauds to get elected to

public office. He said, public officials who criminally abuse our electoral process will end up in federal prison or in the White House, depending on how well you do it. And so it's kind of interesting I think that Marjorie Tayler Green had come to his rescue. I don't know why she is coming in on his side at all. And yet the reality, which I didn't have time to get into, is that when you look at what's happened with the royal family, they have continued to distance themselves

from Andrew, who is connected to Epstein. They understand what an albatross Epstein is. Trump still doesn't, or at least he's doing things to try to get people distracted away from it. That's it for today's show. Thank you for joining us the common Man. They created common Core and dumbed down our children. They created common past, track and control us their Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common

man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity, created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank

you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com