Mon 8Jul24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED - podcast episode cover

Mon 8Jul24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

Jul 08, 20243 hr 1 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

(2:00) Does the French election pass the "sniff test"?
  • How did things change so dramatically from the polls and the election a week earlier?
  • How did Macron make such an astounding comeback from EU route and 3rd place a week earlier?  Did he?
  • What is the new ruling coalition?
  • Who will control it?
  • Which party(s) was threatening "civil war"?
  • UK Elections put the left in charge…a declaration of DEPENDENCE…a difficult time ahead, perhaps Farage will emerge more popular than ever as "Conservative" Party fades to a well-deserved oblivion
(22:27) Mark Twain's 4th of July Speech, 1872 — adapted for today's America
 
(30:01) First Amendment under attack this 4th of July
  • 100 advocates beg US Senate to recognize free exercise of religion as a human right — no action since April
  • Biden's Blinken & State Dept boast of AI surveillance and censorship
  • Google's Jigsaw — incredible hypocrisy and cynicism about "opening up discussions "— via CENSORSHIP!
  • Musician shows how "YouTube is asking ME to trim ME out of MY video".  Get used to your AI censor getting it completely wrong even while the real copyright violations are being committed BY AI
  • The tempest in the teacup about "bloodless' revolution even as people on BOTH sides call for bloody revolution both implicitly and explicitly
(59:27) The Truth About Vaccine Shills — Was Fauci's 'Trust the SCIENCE' Worse Than Alex Jones' 'Trust TRUMP'? "Trust the Trump 4D Chess".  Were Alex Jones' lies about…
  • Trump producing a different vaccine
  • the vaccine being dead or weakened pathogens and not mRNA
  • Aluminum and mercury adjuvants added to the "harmless sugar water" TrumpShot
…were they "taken out of context"?  WATCH and decide for yourself.  Alex would later sell the same type of QAnon fantasies about the election "sting" in order to grift people on "Stop the Steal"
 
(1:17:43) Is this natural supplement that's been used for cognitive and memory function useful for combatting clotting effects of jab?
 
(1:21:26) Latest Dispatches from the War on Cars
  • EU begins putting "governors" on cars that will limit your speed based on your GPS position
  • WalMart begins testing "zero-emission" hydrogen fuel cell EV semi trucks.  No range or charging time issues
  • The "No-Kill Car Shelter" that refurbishes cars, saving them from the junkyard.  Is this our hope for the future?
(1:40:38) ATF Resumes Murdering People & Vivek Murthy Says Guns Are A Disease (Not "Public Health" Bureaucrats)
  • mRNA TrumpShots killed tens of millions worldwide in the last few years, but Biden's "Surgeon General" says guns are a "disease"
  • ATF returns to the days of "Ruby Ridge" and "Waco"
  • "Christian Warrior Training" to protect the sheep at vulnerable places of worship
(2:16:58) Gold spurred by bad jobs report from Dept of Labor as the market anticipates interest rates easing.  Whatever happens, it's "wealth insurance"
 
(2:20:43) Politics & Pageants
  • Another elitist, corporatist meeting — two of them actually in July.  Will Sun Valley affect the presidential "race" more than RNC?
  • Is Biden suffering from Parkinson's?  A Parkinson's specialist visited the White House nearly every month for the last year
  • Hair Apparent — Gavin Nuisance — says no, but his actions say yes, yes
  • Some top Democrats suggest a "Blitz Primary".  What do they have in mind?
  • Are there state requirements that would get in the way of replacing Biden?
  • Jeffrey Epstein document dump and an accusation of a woman who says she was raped by Trump as a minor.  Is ANYONE running that ISN'T a pedo?
(2:54:38) Corporate Lawyer Throws Her Baby Out the Window For Her Career
Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com

If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show

Or you can send a donation through
Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764
Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.com
Cash App at: $davidknightshow
BTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7

Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silver

For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHT


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Transcript

Intro / Opening

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the eighth of July, Year of Our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to began by taking a look at what happened in France. Very curious results, a tremendous swing at the last minute. It should be an indication for many people

as to what might happen here. And as they're preparing everybody for one result, they might just push in another one, because it is, after all a selection. And we'll talk about some of that as well. We'll talk about the Parkinson's likely diagnosis. But again this is from the distance, but it does seem to fit for Biden and I will also talk about the new document dump from Epstein talking about Trump's Peedo involvement there. But we're going to

begin by talking about do we talk about France. We're going to talk about what we have seen over the last few days on the fourth of July. Whatever happened to this country? Is it a free country? What's it ever a free country? How do we find real freedom? We're going to talk about all that. We come back also people who are keeping cars going forever. It's a very hopeful signing. Quite frankly, we'll be right back.

(22:27) (59:27) "Trust the Trump 4D Chess". Were Alex Jones' lies about......were they "taken out of context"? WATCH and decide for yourself. Alex would later sell the same type of QAnon fantasies about the election "sting" in order to grift people on "Stop the Steal"(1:40:38) (2:16:58) from Dept of Labor as the market anticipates interest rates easing. Whatever happens, it's "wealth insurance"(2:54:38) .

Yeah, I'm very excited to see people who are instead of taking cash for clunkers, are giving clunkers new life. This is something that is going to be very important for all of us. We may wind up living in a society that looks very much like a cross between the Amish and mad Max, if you can imagine such a thing. We're going to have to learn how

to do some things ourselves. We've become too dependent on the infrastructure. By the way, interesting article too about what is happening with hydrogen fuel, a big contract with Walmart for their semis. We've got a lot to talk about today. Let's begin with France. A kind of civil war, said some of the people that were there, And of course this is a headline from CNBC. It's going to be the end of the world if the far right one. Now. I don't follow the French politics. I don't know what

these people are about. All I know is that anybody who is not a communist is far right. According to the press here and this is from CNBC, characterize the election as a nationalist anti immigration National Rally Party bills on its initial win in the first round of voting, and you know, they had just had a big win in the European Union Parliament elections. That's what caused

Macron to hold the election. And then lo and behold. You know, they come in and they come in first place, so they win, surprise everybody in the European Union Parliament election. Macron decides to call election the first round of the election one week before this election that happened over the weekend one week before that. They again came in in very strong first place, and

then suddenly within a week they fell to third place. Who would imagine that the leftists and the communists took first place, Macron came from third and moved up to second, and the people who had had two elections in a row featuring very strongly came in third. I wonder what happened. You know, I've talked about this a long time before people started talking about the twenty twenty

election. I pointed out how Smartmatic, one of the first electronic voting machine companies, began in Venezuela by a couple of cronies of Hugo Chavez and he never lost another election after they started using smartmatic machines. Now smart matic because they're no longer owned by these guys, They're probably owned by people who are even worse. Some globals are even worse than Ugo Javez. But they've been bought and sold multiple times. And it's not just a smartmatic issue. Any

of these machines can be done so. They can be rigged by the people who make them. They can be hacked by anybody, anybody, not just the people there at that physical site. They can be hacked anywhere for mewhere in the world, including hostile nations kind of hacked the This is why we should never use electronic voting machines. That has nothing to do with any particular brand, but it has to do with the entire concept. Look, there

is nothing that is secure. Nothing is secure from somebody who wants to hack. Do you think somebody be interested in hacking an election that has the biggest pot of gold the world has ever seen. That's what Washington, d C. Is to criminals. The biggest pot of gold the world has ever seen. Tens of trillions of dollars there just for the asking. You can give a politician a few thousand dollars, you can get back millions or billions.

And so do you think people be interested in hacking that election? It's just ridiculous to put that there. We've had the NSA hacked, the CIA has been hacked, the Defense Department has been hacked, the Justice Department has been hacked. All of these government agencies have been hacked, big private corporations have been hacked. Everybody has been hacked. Why wouldn't you think that election could

be and would be hacked. And so when you look at Hugo Chavez and his record, they had a long documented record of accusations of rigged elections and several Mexican provinces and Philippines had a big scandal in the Philippines where they believe that the elections had been hacked, and in Brazil. And I bring this up because when I look at this French election in Brazil, when Lula was Lula, I think was the guy and those women who replaced him. He

was a full on Marxist, no question about it. Replaced by another one, and she was, she was lagging behind in all the polls, and the day before the election, she went to a big soccer match they called a football match. They don't know any better, a big football game, which is what the rest of the world calls soccer. And she goes a big football game and she's booed off the stage when they introduce her. The

place just erupts into all boos. Sixty thousand people. The next day she's losing significantly, and then all of a sudden, all of the reporting equipment and everything goes down. It all goes down, The whole network goes now goes black, and when it comes back up, lo and behold, she is now winning. They just switched rolls, switch places. So now instead of her losing sixty forty, she's winning sixty forty. Nothing to see there. I'm sure that it was completely honest, don't you Okay? So first

round of voting they win the Conservative French when way out ahead. They were way out ahead with the European Union in parliament. But then one week later, after they won the first round, they fall to third place. How did that happen? So people were talking about They said, it was very very tense time. It's the first time that the far right is winning at the first turn, first round of the ballot. It's a very big deal. We are looking at kind of having a civil war here. And the

left was already starting to riot in anticipation. And notice how they always again this is CNBC, they always refer there is no such thing as conservatives or right wing. It's far right, far right. Francis far right. Are n rejects the extremist label, saying it stands up for French values, culture and citizens at a time when many are fed up with the political establishment that's

been led by Macron since twenty and seventeen. But their opponents and critics warned that France is on the brink of a political catastrophe if an overtly anti immigration, how could we ever have a country that is anti immigration. I mean, we need to just bring in all the people that we can that aren't French right, a nationalist and eurosceptic party. Yeah, you know, they could possibly get out of the European Union like the UK did. Can't have

that happen, can we? So Interestingly enough, they managed to head that off. The first round of the election resulted in the far right are In winning thirty three percent of the vote. The left wing actually they were far left, far left socialists and communists. That's they put together a coalition of socialist, communists and Greens, which are distinctions with a difference. So the

left wing New Popular Front garnered twenty eight percent in the first round. It was a Conservatives thirty three, the communist twenty eight, and Macron twenty percent. Then what happened over the weekend when they had the second round, Well, it went from the the Nationalists went from thirty three percent down to twenty five percent in third place. The far left went from twenty eight percent up to thirty three percent. They switched places, you know, just like that

Brazilian election. They switched places, except it was even worse because Macron, that was at twenty managed to go to twenty eight and come in in second place. Oh you know, the just one week the Roschild banker and the EU bureaucrats managed to pull this thing off somehow, somehow. So what kind of a coalition is this going to be? Well, the they're not sure who's going to manage this. Because as soon as Macron said he's going to hold an election, all the radical left said, we've got to stop the

Nationalist Party from getting power. So they put together this coalition that went from second place to first place, from the first round to the second round. They call themselves the New Popular Front. There had been a group called the Popular Front to block fascists from taking power in nineteen thirty six, so they

were essentially calling the Conservatives fascists. And what does it consist of, Well they have the French Socialist Party, the Green Ecologist Party, the French Communist Party, and the center left Place Public Public Place and other smaller parties and of course that center left label you can discount that that's coming from CNBC. So it's going to be far left and Marxists that they handed the election to. So who's going to run this thing? Well, they got so many

different parties there, they don't really know who's in charge of it. Is it going to be a roths Todd banker, Is it going to be the UN Is it going to be NATO? Who's going to run this thing? Well there means to be seen, so it's hard to say what's going to happen and what are their policies. Well, the only thing that we know of this new coalition, the National Front or whatever the NFP, forget what

the acronym was, They have pledged to immediately recognize the Palestinian state. They want to raise the minimum monthly wage because you know they're communists, and they want to raise pensions because they're communists. Everybody who was upset at Macron because he had raised the French retirement age from sixty two to sixty four, they thought that was could not last. And then we have in the UK. This was not a surprise. We look at the UK elections. This graphic,

I think says it's best from Sky News. You can see the different parties there with their vote totals, Labor running away with it all at four hundred and ten, Conservatives falling back to one hundred and thirty one. What a pathetic display of quote unquote conservative policies Boris Johnson and Rishie Sunak have been So you've got Labor at four hundred and ten, the Liberal Democrats that sixty one. The Scottish National Party might as well be the Socialist National Party.

So together with those are almost five hundred seats, whereas on the Conservative reform side you've got one hundred and thirty one Conservative only thirteen reform seats. However, it should be interesting because Nigel Farage will be in the House of Comments. I would love to see that, and I'm sure that we will see many clips that are very interesting. He was amazing when he was in the European Union as a member of that legislature. I remember the first time I

saw him. He came after the Greek government because they had thrown out an elected official and put in a Goldman Sachs banker. Trying to remember which one it was, doesn't matter, does it. How dare you in the nation that was the cradle of democracy and voting and all this kind of stuff to throw out the elected representative and put in a technocrat. That was the first time they started using these terms like technocrat, and they were not directly referring

back to the technocracy of the nineteen thirties Kelon Musk and others. But it was very interesting, and so it should be very interesting there in the House of Commons. They have very very lively debates. When Karen and I got married and we went to England, I had three months between the time I graduated in December when my job started in in March in Texas, and so we just you know, had no money, but we just hung out and did everything we could for free, went to one museum after the other.

We went to the Old Bailey Criminal Trial and watched that and for a while, and then we also went into the House of Commons on a day that they questioned the Prime Minister, which is like on Thursdays. I had Margaret Thatcher was a Prime minister, and so it was always very interesting back and forth that was happening there. And I'm sure that it cuntains time for Nigel

Farage this week. He'll be everybody as entertaining as a Thatcher was going against the left in the UK at the time, So that's going to be an interesting thing. And I think that you're going to see the Reform Party grow significantly, and I think you're going to see the thoroughly discredited Conservatives drop. But the reason I cover this first is because all the news that I see over the weekend was all about Biden's mental capacity, as if he was ever

in charge. Come on, folks, let let's not pretend that these guys are actually running the government. Let's get serious about this. It's a lot of fun to pretend about that. And we're going to probably have some kind of a reality TV melodrama for the next few months and maybe even at the Democrat Convention that the republic Convention is not going to be much of a melodrama. They're going to do all of it behind closed doors. Trump has got

that completely locked down with his daughter in law in charge. So they're not even going to have a platform discussion, you know, for things like abortion and things like that, they'll do all about behind closed doors. They're not going to have the Republican delegates even have a say. It's all going to be dictated from the top down, from top down by Trump. So the Democrats side may be kind of interesting, and everybody wants to talk about that,

and we will get around to that. There's some things that I think are far more relevant and more interesting that we're going to talk about first. But I wanted to talk about this and what happened in France because the problem is when you talk about it could be a civil war, and everybody was saying that in the lead up to it. If the Left doesn't get their way, it's going to be a civil war. You notice that there hasn't been a civil war, there hasn't been rioting in the streets. After those

horrible far right extremists of the National Party. After they lost, they didn't burn everything down. Everybody was expecting the left to do that, and it was going to be mostly peaceful as they burned down the country. And so when we look at this election, and we look at what is happening with Biden, and we look at the polls and the rest of this stuff, are you are they setting up the American people for a ropod ope gonna everybody? Oh, yes, absolutely certain Trump is gonna win. Well, what

happens if he doesn't? You got people like Steve Bannon, Jack the Soviet Donald Trump himself, Alex Jones, with people like that, all pushing Oh, we got to this is it. We got to have a revolution. We're going to have to have a civil war if we have people we know, Karen said, look at this on Facebook. Somebody we know, somebody who's a Christian said, well, you know, if this election Trump doesn't win, this election is over, We're gonna have to fight, you know

all this rest of stuff. It's like, wow, really, you're ready, really ready to go into a civil war over this democrat, narcissist, billionaire, pedophile. You have a civil war over him. It's all about him. As a matter of fact, we had a listener send me this said, look at this, this is blake Master sign and Arizona Blake Masters, who was a friend of Peter Teal. Peter Teal put him forward, and so of course you know Peter Teel's money and his endorsement with Trump.

Trump endorsed Blake Masters, and blake Masters ran for Senate and lost because he's not a real conservative. When Dobbs came out, he quickly scrambled. Remember I talked about that. He scrambled and changed his website completely erased all this stuff, and you know about how pro life he was and backtracked and he lost. Well, now he's back and he's running for Congress, and of

course he's got Trump's endorsement again and he endorses Trump. Look at this sign, pro Trump, pro Trump, pro Trump, Blake Masters for Congress. Wow, I guess we can just forget about any issues. The only issue is Trump. You're either for him or again him. Right, he's pro Trump. That's all you need to know. You don't need to know what blake Masters is on any of the issues, because just like his master Trump

that he claims to love. He's malleable in the issues. Oh tell you whatever you want to hear, and then he'll do whatever people pay him to do when he gets into office. Well, when we come back, we're going to take a look at some fourth of July news. I want to thank Guard Goldsmith for standing in on fourth of July doing an excellent job, as he always does. It's always great to have excuse me, it always great to have Guard come in and do the show, and I appreciate him

doing it on the fourth of July, of all things. I really did need a rest and I took the time off. And I mean I had another a fib thing yesterday or yeah, it was actually Saturday night and Sunday. But you know, so I need to have a rest every once in a while, and it's great to know that the Guard can always take this over. Really do appreciate that. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Fourth of

July eighteen seventy two. Mark Twain happened to be in London and there was a meeting of Americans in British in London, and he was there to speak a gathering of Americans in London July fourth, eighteen seventy two, and I thought his speech was kind of interesting. I made a couple of updates. He referred to people as he said, you know, we're nation that's developed Washington of Franklin, A William Tweed, remember Boss Tweed and the corruption in

New York that was famous at that time. A longfellow, a Motley, a Jay Gould, a Samuel palmeroy so Forth said, well, you know, we've gon update this with some contemporary figures. Were are a country that has developed a Washington of Franklin, a Bill Gates, A Larry Fink, an occasional cortex, a Taylor Swift, a Trump and a Biden. What's not to love about America? I mean, are we the greatest country ever?

Usa? USA? Who else could I come up with? A Taylor Swift, a Trump, and a Biden to be the icons of this country? And of course occasional cortex. He says. We also have a Congress which has never had its equal in some respects. You know that brings higher prices than any other in the world. That's still true today, isn't it. We still got a Congress that is the most expensive to buy anywhere in the world. And he says, we have a criminal jury system which is

superior to any other in the world. Its efficiency is only marred by the difficulty of finding twelve men every day who don't know anything and can't read. That's kind of like the Trump Jury's right. We have an insanity plea that would have saved Caine, he said, And then he began talking about the railway system, which he had a particular disdain for the fact that the railway

system at the time was known for running over people. You know, most of the things are not moving that fast in those days, so people kind of, I guess, underestimate the danger of the railroad and maybe did not get out of the way quickly enough. And so but today the real killer in our society, course is not the real but the public health system.

I think Mark Twain would have appreciated the irony, don't you. So let me just replace railway system with public health I refer with effusion to our public health system, which cost which consents to let us live, though it might do the opposite. Being our owners, he says, the public health system seriously regretted the killing of some on our particular case, thirty million people worldwide. For him, with a railroad, there's only thirty thousand people, and

it went so far as to pay some of them voluntarily. Of course, or the meanest of us would not claim that we possess a court treacherous enough to enforce a law against a railway company. So if they give anybody a compensation, I have to do it voluntarily. Well, we haven't seen that. As a matter of fact, even the people have tried to go before

court, very few of them have gotten any compensation. We had a couple of people who have recovered compensation from a treacherous employer who tried to force an injection on them. But he said, but thank Kevin. The pharma companies are generally disposed to do the right and kindly thing without compulsion. Public health system as well. Right, I know of an instance which greatly touched me at the time, he said, after an accident, and he's talking about

railroad companies. But we could kind of apply this. They sent home the remains of a dear distant old relative of mine in a basket with a remark, please state what figure you hold him at and return the basket. He says, Now, there couldn't be anything friendlier than that. Well, certainly is friendlier than our pharmaceutical and public health masters, the military industrial complex that ran this mass murder. They didn't voluntarily help anybody that didn't tell us the

name of price, did they? They named the price. By the way, we'll name the price, said Trump. You point the finger, somebody say they got COVID thirteen thousand dollars, you put them on a ventilator, I'll give you thirty nine thousand dollars. And then after they die, we'll bribe the family to go with your diagnosis that they died from COVID, not from remdesivir, not from the ventilator, not from neglect to malpractice, and do not resuscitate orders. And if they go along with that, we'll give

them six thousand dollars for the funeral. How about that? Oh, and we'll give you twenty percent for everything that you do while they're in the hospital, while you're killing them. How about that? You know? Over the weekend we went we were invited to a local picnic and I wanted to meet some local people. And it was there who has a local paper, And I said, oh, what kind of news do you cover? And he said, well, you know, we really had to reinvent things in twenty

twenty. He said, in twenty twenty they shut down all the sports and we're like, what are we going to report on? It's like, what what are you going to report on? I mean, it was a five alarm fire. We had everything locked down. I said there quietly, because I was invited as a guest, I didn't say anything. It was very nice. I got home. We're laughing about it and my son said, yeah, nothing of any interest happened in twenty twenty that a paper would be

interested in reporting. It's unbelievable anyway. Of course, they've won several awards because of that kind of reporting. That's exactly the kind of reporting that gets rewarded. If you start talking about what's really going on, you would get drummed out of business anyway. So that was an example of what Mark Twain was going to talk about on the fourth of July in London in eighteen seventy

two. But then he put a footnote and he says, well, alb is at least the above speech which I was going to make, but which our US government Minister General Schneckt presided, and after a blessing, he got up and made a great long, inconceivably dull harangue, and wound up saying that inasmuch as speech making did not seem to exhilarate the guests much, all further oratory would be dispensed with during the evening and we could just sit and

talk privately to our elbow neighbors and have a good sociable time. It is known that the consequence of that remark, forty four perfected speeches died in the womb people were so excited to get up and make a speech. Is as the depression, the gloom, the solemnity that reigned over the banquet from that time forth will be a lasting memory with the many that were there By that one thoughtless remark. The General lost forty four of the best friends he had

in England. They owe him to get up and make a speech. It's

First Amendment under attack this 4th of July

a different time, I guess on Ray Finn, thank you very much, Dustin. I appreciate that. Dustin helm Well, when we look at the state of our nation, going back to April, there was a bipartisan Senate resolution five to sixty nine and it's been languishing without anything happening to it since it was introduced the beginning of April. It was a resolution where more than one hundred advocates urged the Senate to designate religious freedom as a fundamental right.

Have they not read the Constitution? Perhaps not, because you know, we are supposed to have free speech. But even the Supreme Court agreed. The Supreme Court, both Trump and Biden administration, the Congress, both Republican and Democrat, they all agree that it's just fine for corporations to censor people if the government tells them to that. It's not the digital public square, even though it is. So you can forget about the free speech of the people.

You know, it's kind of interesting. Americans never had as much free speech as they were given with social media, only to have it yanked away from them by the government. What's that about. You want to get some people angry, Well give them something that they've never had before, let them enjoy it for a little bit, and then yank get away from them. So you forget about free speech. What about the free press, Well that's banned. You know, we've got NewsGuard, we've got social media censorship as

well. All these other things. So forget about the free press. What about peaceful assembly, you know like January sixth, No, you can't have that. What about being able to redress your grievances, Well, you might get on a list. You might also get banned. You also might get a knock on the door from the FBI. You want to have you want to redress your grievances, Well, don't think about running for office because we're not going to let you in the ballot and we're not going to let you

into the debates saying forget about redressing your grievances as well. So that leaves religious freedom, and we need to have the Senate say that religious freedom is a fundamental right. That's why it's in the Bill of Rights. But I guess none of these guys actually read the Constitution and they really don't care about

this resolution because they didn't pass it either. Over one hundred religious freedom advocates and groups and various religious backgrounds called on Congress back in April to affirm religious freedom as a fundamental right by passing a resolution to recognize the global threats to religious liberty. Yeah, when we look at this, it was really about

global threats. They're pretending, of course, that you know, we're secure because we've got that piece of paper called the Constitution of the Bill of Rights, so we don't have to worry about that here at home. I guess maybe it was focused on play like Nigeria and India Iran where they imprison and kill Christians. But then when you look at what happened on the fourth of July, we had a prohibition against people carrying crosses, and the Christians actually

double cross the people trying to prohibit it. Here they are in Courtelaine, Idaho, where the council said we don't want any religious symbols on the fourth of July. Rates everybody carrying crosses, putting crosses on their shirts, carrying wooden crosses. Here's what we think of your prohibition. Yeah, they just shoved it right down their throats. So the Bill Wrights doesn't protect us. Outlines some very important principles which are politicians and bureaucrats could not care less about.

We have to care about it to pick up your cross and carry it if you want to have freedom. That's the lesson of this fourth of July. And then we have Anthony Blinkin giving it address with the State Department, where they were bragging about the fact that they now have a new AI plan to be able to do censorship better. The ICE potential to analyze vast amounts of data in real time, identify trends, and provide insights as transforming the

way we approach global challenges. Now that's the underlink. Who was there to introduce Anthony Blinkin As Technocracy News says, Blincoln, member of the Trilateral Commission, is gleeful for the gift of AI so that he can crush free speech once and for all. Their quest started in nineteen eighty one, says the Technocracy News, when they crushed Anthony Sutton's academic career in our scholarly books Trilaterals

over Washington, Volumes one and two. Trilateral David Rockefeller lately later bragged about how they had deceived the world. Well, we all know what they're doing. The question is when are we going to do something about it? And how do we do something about it? Well, we do it at the most local level, just like those people in Courtlaine, Idaho. Google has an app called Jigsaw, and I guess they want to cut us up, literally into different people. But they present it differently. I don't know how

they argue the etymology of that word, Jigsaw says twenty seventeen. Jigsaw has used machine learning to enable more voices to participate in online conversation. Have you noticed that? Have you noticed how Google has been enabling more voices to participate in conversation? You notice how they've been expanding our free speech everywhere? And I didn't notice that either. By identifying and mitigating toxicity that frequently reduces participation

in online debates, Well, the most toxic thing I've ever seen. That's what YouTube does demand people. And here's a good example of this. I saw this over the weekend and it had a very interesting title said, YouTube is asking me to edit me out of my videos. And this is a guy who he's got a channel. I've seen some of his videos before. It's kind of interesting. He does great titles. And so he caught me once before with a video he said, nobody will ever hear a singer like

this again. And what it was was it was a clip of Judy Garland seeing somewhere over the rainbows a young girl, and he showed because the tools now can analyze the waveforms and put them on a grid of the twelve note system that we have here. And so he said, look at this. You know, she's singing and it just kind of swoops down flat, then it goes up a little bit sharp and then comes back down even before the vibrato starts anything. And he goes, and it sounds natural to your hair.

But she's off pitch and then finally comes back into pitch. She knows where it is, but she's playing around with it. He says, that'll never be allowed. Today. They rigidly push everything onto a grid. And the more rigid they get about it, the more it sounds like auto tuning, because the more it is like auto tuning. And so I said, you'll never hear a singer like that again. Now, he says, So YouTube is asking me to edit me out of my video, and so he

is somebody who there, he is right there. He also talks about guitar, and so I'm going to play for you a little bit of what he said YouTube was doing. And actually, unlike when they called a copyright strike

on me, they just took down my video. When I did the video about the creation of the Federal Reserve on its one hundredth anniversary It's a Wonderful Lie, and I used clips It's few little clips from It's a Wonderful Life, along with my commentary about the creation of the Federal Reserve and the skullduggery and the things like that they were done as part of that, and the predictions about how it would do precisely what it's been doing for the last now

one hundred and eleven years. It's eleventy one this year will be was it December twenty third? I think anyway, it'll be eleventy one, just like just like Frodo not Frodo Bilbo anyway. But you know, they took it down and it was it was fair use. And as I pointed out, the entire movie where I took the clips from, the entire movie of Its Wonderful Life was up at the time, had been up for a decade, had a million views, and they came after me for something that was fair

use. A couple of clips I put here and there comparing the bank runs that were engineered by the guy that was similar to JP Morgan and that type of thing, drawing those parallels to it. So they took it down for that. Now here's what they're doing. Now. They show you the area of the video that they say has a copyright claim and listen to what they

did to this guy. So recently on the channel, I did a video about copyright and explained what happens when you upload a video to YouTube, and that if you look at anything that is somebody else's copyright material, then it's going to get copyright claimed and you won't get the ad revenue for that particular video. But there are other arrangements and I do describe all of those in

that video. The reason for this one is because when I was making that video, I had to look through my channel to see which videos had been blocked, and I thought, well, I will re edit them so that people can watch my previous analysis videos that have been blocked and just get rid

of the parts that are a claimed. I was breaking down the guitar techniques, and you can see on the screen here we've got these blue rectangles where it says where the copyright material starts and where the content is and kind of when it ends, and you can see these little blocks of when I'm playing part of the song and then analyzing it and demonstrating techniques but I did have a little look through and we'll just have a look. This is the beginning

of this rectangle here and see what it is. So there we have it again, and just as a guide when we're playing along to this, you want to be in your mind and the pentatonic shape one here twelve thret As you probably noticed earlier on when I was playing through, we've got these unison bends as well. Now I don't know if it's just me, but that doesn't sound like David Bowie singing or any of the performance. So this is the reason that it's a bit frustrating is because this is clearly me playing the

guitar. But the start of this section is claiming this as copyright content, that this is somebody's song, that this is somebody's performance. I learn it play on kind of like that, and it's all within our shape. That's pretty much what you want to be playing through just throughout this whole performance.

We've got lots of little techniques going on like that. So this is now quite a long segment, and you can see clearly the rectangle starts here and this is well into this segment that this is claimed and none of this is copyright using these techniques on the guitar. I'm not playing anything from the song here. I'm demonstrating unison Benz, which is a guitar technique, and you

know Ben's hammerons and pull offs, so things that every guitarist uses. And you can't copyright Benz or hammerons and or slides on a guitar, or when you're singing. You can't copyright that and say I own that technique. Nobody else is now allowed to do it. So I was amazed that they are claiming this part of the video. I mean, I get it for maybe sections where we're listening to it, and then I'm demonstrating it, and even still when you're talking about using it in that way, it's still what I

would consider fair use. Of listening to somebody play a guitar solo and then me explaining exactly what's going on in the solo, what techniques they're using, and how they're achieving their sound. I see that as fair use. I would consider that fair use that I'm not just playing a song and uploading it. Okay, so you get the idea and think about the hypocrisy that's here, and it all focuses now on AI. He's not talking about anything that's

political. There's nothing controversial about these musicians that they want to try to disappear or anything like that. Now, what this is now with his censorship is AI. Consider the hypocrisy of the fact that AI is out there, whether it's YouTube or I mean, whether it's Google or whether it's one of these other tech companies. They're out there stealing everything from everybody. It's built on theft, built on theft, about watching you, about watching everyone's content,

including musical content. It's all about theft. And then consider the fact that it is the AI itself that is flagging him talking about basic guitar techniques like slides, hammer ons and pull offs and things like that. It's just and this is our future. Folks. Got to get away from YouTube, got

to get away from these people. They are going to steal everything for themselves, and they will leave you absolutely nothing that you can talk about because they want to own everything, and that includes in You will own nothing, none of that information. They will tell you to take yourself out of your own video or else. Don't do business with people like that. I mean, I don't even have to make that decision. They took down my Christmas music

that I had performed, canceled my entire channel. Not the first time I've been canceled on YouTube without any explanation. So now expanding our works as YouTube to enable every voice to be meaningfully heard. What cynical liars there? I despise Google. You know, Steve Jobs knew where they were before he died. He says, their mottos don't be able. He goes, yeah,

right right, He knew how evil they were before most people did. A set of tools, in the words of Lisa Skirch, allows a large scale exchange of views in an iterative discussion, allowing participants to evolve in their understanding. Is that what you see happening on anything that's controlled by Google, by any of these social media companies. By the way, the guy who did that, the name of his channel is Wings of Pegasus, is very good.

We believe that when high quality moderation, bridging techniques and effective sense making, effective sense making. What a load of bolshevik? These people are a Bolsheviker, aren't they. When they work together, more individuals will participate, and they will participate more deeply, allowing a more complete picture of the community to evolve. This is the same anti white racist who talk about diversity all

the time. Now you know what we need to do. We need to paraphrase Karl Hess's slogan that he wrote for Goldwater, Extremism and defense of free speech is no vice. Moderation of content to be kind, quote unquote is no virtue. Folks. We've got to get over this idea that everybody's snowflake feelings have to be protected and in order to do that that we have to destroy free speech. No, no extremism in the protection of free speech is

no vice. But it is interesting how everybody's spun this over the weekend. Heritage Foundation and I'm no fan of the Heritage Foundation, the largest conservative think tank that is out there. Why am I no fan of them because in twenty eighteen they took the side of corporate censorship, just like the largest libertarian think tank, the Cato Institute did. Both of them said that, hey, these tech companies can sens whoever they wish. We knew who they were

censoring and why. We knew very clearly that it was all about politics, and we knew that they were taking orders from the government, and they were reluctant to pull back from the stuff, even after the documents were produced that showed that they were acting on orders of the government to censor people. And then even after we had the documents, and even after states started to take action against it, you have sellouts to the First Amendment like Amy Cony Barrett,

who doesn't know what the First Amendment is. She couldn't answer that in her confirmation hearings, and she doesn't care to know, and she doesn't care to support free speech for the American public. They shut down these things so well, you don't know on some technicalities. They basically punted and evaded their responsibility because you see, they have a duty to protect the constitution what they said with Marbury versus Madison, except that when it's not politically expedient to do

so, they do not protect the Constitution. So Heritage Foundation went on and on an interview and it was on Steve Bannon's podcast, Steve Bannon is in jails. You have somebody doing a guest hosting for him, and the head of the Heritage Foundation, it's president Kevin Roberts, is facing blowback because he said we weren't to have a bloodless revolution well, I didn't see anything wrong with that. A bloodless revolution. We can't even talk about having a bloodless

revolution now. And that was walking back significantly from the kind of rhetoric that we see Bannon using all the time, Bannon and Jack b Soviet and Trump himself, Alex Jones, these people out there calling for blood in the streets times then they'll walk it back. You know. Oh a minute, No, I didn't mean I said this note, and I'm saying something else now. And see I never said that before. You did say it. You did say it. But Biden's campaign jumped on this comment said Trump's allies are

dreaming of a violent revolution to destroy every idea of America. I agree with that. I think that is exactly what they're being groomed for. And I've said it many times myself, because they're not talking about reforming this corrupt system that we see operating on Trump being used by the Department of Justice. It needs to be reformed, but they don't want reform. They want revenge,

and they don't necessarily say they want it bloodless either. That's why I say, when I look at this, I thought the Heritage Foundation was being quite a bit more responsible than Steve Bannon himself on Steve Bannon's podcast. As a matter of fact, if not Ben in jail, Steve Bannon would have probably said, w I do to know about bloodless, Let's make it bloody.

I don't know. Trump distanced himself from the Heritage Foundation. I had something they called Project twenty twenty five, an initiative led by the Heritage Foundation think tank to come up with policy blueprints. Now, when Trump ran in twenty sixteen, I've said this many times. He had wonderful policy blueprint to replace Obamacare, and it was a very conservative blueprint. I read it a couple of times on air. I said this is perfect, and I said,

I don't know if he's going to do this. We see politicians making promises like this all the time. And I said, at the time, I haven't heard Trump say a word about it, but it was it was not coming from some disconnected think tank like the Heritage Foundation. He has distanced himself from the Heritage Foundation, like he did Julian as songe in Wiki leaks. Now, I don't know who the Heritage Foundation is, you know, that type of thing. But at the time, and it was about seven to

ten points. I forget how many points there were different times of reforms be done to the health system to improve some of the problems that we had. First of all, allow competition across state lines. Allow people to own medical savings accounts and other things like that. And give them the so that you have a marketplace. Give them the information about the doctors and about the hospitals

and what their record is. Make that available to the public so they can look it up and compare doctors and see compare prices, compare how good they are, what kind of a record do they have in terms of problems and things like that. So they had a lot of very good things in it. And as soon as the election was over, you never heard anything else about it. And I went back to look at it and they had taken

the page down. You see, issues don't matter to Trump. They really don't, whether it's coming from the Heritage Foundation or whether it's coming from his own campaign. He doesn't care about any of this stuff. This is just a fidget spinner for people who like to play with this stuff to keep them busy, to entertain their imagination during the election process. He's got no commitments

to any policy, especially conservative policies. So Heritage and Kevin Roberts are standing by the comment, even though Biden went out there and said, look, they want a violent revolution. No, he said bloodless. He said bloodless. And people are always doing this. They've done this type of thing with Biden as well, the conservatives did. I saw the comment over the weekend. Look, he called himself a black woman. No he didn't. He

was saying he served under Barack Obama. He was virtue signaling, yeah, I know a lot of black people, and some of them are clean, like Barack Obama. Right. Remember when he made that remark, It was he was saying, oh, I know, I know Obama. I served with Obama and then I had the first black female vice president. If you listened to the comment, you know what's going on with that. But everybody

portrayed it as, oh, look he thinks he's a black woman. Now, this kind of rhetoric on both sides is part of the absurdity of this election. One of the most absurd things I've ever seen in my life. Anyway, he said what he said was Americans in twenty twenty four are in the process of carrying out the Second American Revolution to take power back from the elites and despotic bureaucrats. These patriots are committed to peaceful revolution at the ballot

box, he said. He warned, the left may not allow a peaceful transfer of power. That's not nearly as bad as the stuff that Bannon himself has said, or Jack but sober Trump Heritage repeated the bloodless comment in a separate post on x alongside a compilation video of Democrats, commentators, and public figures making controversial comments about unrest and protests. You see both the left and

the right want a bloody revolution. This is one of the reasons why I cover politics, not because of care who is the occupant of the White House. That's just a puppet. Before you get all excited about, I care because the people who really think it's going to make a difference are so excited that they're willing to have a bloody revolution to support this New York Democrat pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, a guy who has promoted the transgender stuff before anybody else did,

and every issue, every issue. He is not conservative. Guy who did gun control by executive order, the guy who enacted the medical martial law that we'd always said was coming through a declaration of emergency. Guests who did it. It was their conservative guy, and he had people like Alex showsa, Oh it's fine, it's fine. Trust it is Trump. Roberts made his original comment Tuesday on Vannon's war Room podcast. He said, the left

has taken over our institutions. The reason that they are apoplectic right now, the reason so many anchors on MSNBC, for example, are losing their minds daily is because our side is winning. Oh there you go? Are we? Are you? Really? What is? What does it mean to win? You're a think tank, your policy organization. Tell us, please, what were these policies that Trump put in place that are winning for conservatives? How about adding you know, six trillion dollars to the deficit in one year?

Is at a conservative policy? I had David Stockman on to talk about how Trump was killing the economy, and he was killing the economy even before he did that, but he set that up as a new precedent that was eagerly followed by Biden, just as Biden followed his precedent to do gun control by executive order, to do the COVID lockdowns and medical martial law by executive order, are you following all that stuff? Trump broke all of that.

He set the precedent, he said, So we're in the process of the second American run evolution, which will remain bloodless if the Left allows it to be. And so now Trump has gone full disavow, just like you did with wiki links. Well, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. As your news been censored, banned, censored, banned over and over again. Has vital information been held prisoner by mainstream and anti social media. It's the duty of every thinking person to make the great

escape to The Davidnightshow dot com. There you'll find links to live streams, videos, audio podcasts, and support links. Live stream the show at d Live and every Monday through Friday nine am. Easter videos at bitch Shoot and huge Tube, new audio podcast The Real David Night Show at iTunes, Stitcher, iHeart and more. But even though there's a light at the end of the tunnel, without your support, the show will run out of gas.

The links to support the show all at Thedavidnightshow dot com. To donate via Subscribe star, donate via or donate via cash app, Bitcoin or po bonds are sincere things to all of you who have stood with us to get this fall. Please don't forget to share the links and pray for the country as well as our family. All right, man, is we got to get a new version of that and so many different beefs are those beeps are places where they have shut us down, where you can no longer support the program

or hear the program. But by the way, that reminded me. I've not responded yet to the individual who sent this, I don't think, but I just wanted to mention. Had a listener who has supported us for a long time from Australia on subscribe Star. He said, I hear you saying that you can listen to the program if you're a subscribe Star supporter without any

commercials? How do I do that? And I apologize. We need to tell everybody if you are a subscriber on a subscribe Star, what we do is every day we post the video as well we post links to the video as well as to the audio without any commercials, and so the podcast is without commercials. I think Rumble puts commercials in, don't they, Travis, and I think they add some commercials. We don't have a control over that. I don't think there's commercials on Bitshoot. And then we give you a

podcast version that does not have commercials that's available for subscribers. You have to go to the channel where you subscribed. And I looked at it and I thought, yeah, I guess a lot of people don't do that because I have people occasionally tell me, you know, my credit card hasn't been operating. I thought I was supporting you on subscribe Star, but it hasn't been

operating for a year now, you know, something like that. And so just go to subscribe Star, go to my page, and if you're a subscriber, there'll be a link along with the description of the show that is there for subscribe Star people to listen without commercials. So thank you for your support. I appreciate that. Let's talk a little bit about the vaccines. And this was something that just made my jaw drop. On the Hill, they had an article said the demonization of doctor Fauci. Wow, Wow,

last month. This is just the most amazing article I think I've read anywhere where is this person who does this person work for? By the way, let's go to the end of the article here and see This is Glenn alt Schuller, an emeritus professor and studies at Cornell University. Oh well, an award winning produce. She sees nothing at all wrong with what It takes a lot of education to become this stupid exactly exactly. Now you're starting to sound

like Mark Twain. So this is what he has to say. Last month, Republican members of the House Select Subcommittee on the coronavirus Pandemic blasted doctor Anthony Fauci. I guess we should call him f u Auci. Would that'd be a better name for him. For his support of mask and vaccine mandates, for his support of lockdowns, and for his support of school closures. Yeah,

all these things that tanked the economy, hurt people. It didn't work crazy, that's right, But not for this person, not for this emeritus professor at Cornell. He said. They alleged, they alleged that Fauci had covered up government funding of research lab in Wuhan, China. Look, there's allegation about any of that stuff used to write words. He hasn't been convicted in the court of this but everybody besides this professor knows what the truth is.

I just found it absolutely stunning that somebody would have the audacity to put this kind of a lie, an absurd lie, into print, and that they'll would publish it, he said, And he quotes Marjorie Taylor Green, who said, mister Fauci belongs in prison. He should be tried for mass murder and crimes against humanity. I absolutely agree. I've said that many times. Unfortunately, she also then followed that up calling him an a hole and

a liar, which undermines her initial criticism. I believe in most people's minds, Peter Navarro said, Fauci quote has been wrong about everything, so is Peter Navarro. Peter Navarro was the one who was bragging about getting ventilators out and it killed about ninety percent of the people they put them on. He said. Faucci's been wrong about everything, especially the effectiveness of a droxi corquin and treating COVID. Then this guy says USA Today soon acknowledged Navarro's claims did

not meet as fact checking standards. USA Today does not meet my fact checking standards. I've looked at that, and it's not as effective as ivermectin,

but it is effective. A droxy coriquine and zinc were very effective. And we had a study that came out of France at that time in twenty twenty showing how a nation after nation, they went through Europe, they went through Asia, they went through Africa, they went through North America, Europe, all these different regions, country after country after country, and they said,

okay, nobody was dying. And then they bring in the and then you know, at some point they start getting some cases, and then they bring in ivermectin and goes down to zero. Then they bring in the vaccine and it goes we up above where itever was. For In November twenty twenty, this person writing on the hill, so Steve Bannon proposed that fauci an FBI director Christopher Ray should be beheaded. I'd put their heads on pikes as a

warning the federal bureaucrat. SYE. That's the Steve Bannon, I know, the reckless, loose cannon, throwing stuff out there that discredits him and anybody who follows him. But again, you know Project twenty twenty five. Oh, I don't want to have anything to do with them, because they're talking about a bloodless revolution. Evidently Trump wants a bloody revolution like Bannon and thesoviec

and Jones are putting out there. In twenty twenty one, a Maryland man named Patrick Thomas Patrick Connelly, using an anonymous encrypted account, send emails vowing to make Fauci quote pay with your children's blood for your crimes unquote. Notice that it was encrypted and anonymous, and they still caught him. This will let you know that nothing is there on the Internet, not your cryptocurrency, not your anonymous encryptid emails, nothing, and it's going to become even less

secure as they roll out quantum computing. And guess what, when they roll out quantum computing, the US government isn't going to tell you for quite some time that they've got it anyway, And to drag Fauci into the street, to break every bone in his body with crowbars and sledgehammers and set them on fire. We can all appreciate the Senate of the sentiment, but he got a three year sentence for that. The demonization of Fauci strongly suggests that partisan

polarization, contempt for expertise, contempt for expertise. Are you kidding me? What expertise is he shown? And this highly effective mask or is highly effective vaccines or is highly affected six foot distance in lockdown. None of it was effective, None of it was science. There's all tyranny, the courseness, the cruelty, and the cultish propensity for conspiracy theories, says this guy. Well, they never addressed the tyranny. They never addressed the deaths that his

policies caused. You know, I was talking earlier about well, how do we fix Obamacare. Well, one of the things is to publish the results in the records of individual doctors and hospitals to let you know who is a Fauci and who's a real doctor. But we don't have any of that. Can't have that data. No, no, no, no, no, got to hide that. Judge, by any reasonable criteria, says this person.

Fauci was an exemplary public servant. Yes, so good as a matter of fact, that we paid him more than twice the legal limit and then gave him royalties an undetermined amount. Since they won't release that, they are not following those rules that require them to release the royalties that they got. You know, Fauci's salary and everyone in the bureaucracy is supposed to have their salaries capped at the salary of the Vice president and Fauci's boss and his boss's

boss. Their salaries were captain just over two hundred thousand. Fauci, however, was making more than the President of the United States, more than four hundred thousand dollars exemplary. Indeed, he was the chief explainer to the American people about the preventative measures, vaccines, treatments, and diagnostics. Yeah, he gave immureity to the pharmaceutical companies. He gave them a license to kill,

a license to steal, a license to lie. Interestingly enough, the same description that Jesus gives of Satan himself come to steal, to kill, and to destroy. Voter registration records confirm Faucie's not affiliated with either Democrat or Republican party. Why would he. He's equally comfort with both a Trump and a Biden, with both Republicans in control of Congress and Democrats. Republicans may occasionally give him a tongue lashing, but they keep shoving the money for years.

To him, it was Republicans is Ronald Reagan who gave the pharmaceutical companies legal immunity, and it was Trump who pushed that in so Yeah, he's an example of the bipartisan bureaucracy that stays there forever. Fauci should be lionized, he says, lionized. Throw him to the lions, I say, for his outstanding contributions to public health, not demonized. And yet, interestingly, as this guy says he should be lionized, we have an actor, Mike Couslin, who dies. He's an actor in some kind of a play

or a movie. I don't know which one it is. It was called lion s So you want lionized Fauci. How about the actor who is in this at thirty years old, he died of an unexpected cardiac event. Cardiac event, Yeah, Prince is wrong. Thing. So it's the greatest cause of human suffering and death is the government organized crime. I'm done with the BS. Either the people wake up or we sink with a ship of fools. Yeah, how do I get off of this ship? It's kind of

crazy. And so, with all of that said, I got an email today from someone who said, look at what Michael John just posted. Evidently he had made some statements about the sugar water vaccine thing that I've played for you many times. From Alex Jones, and so he put something of a retraction up saying, well, you know, Alex Jones, call me in person and explain to me that this was taken out of contact. So let me play it for you, because I'll play you a longer clip than I

usually play. Now this will does not have the additional commercial that Alex had done about Bill Gates and about the wonderful Trump vaccine. So he did a commercial and then this is what This is a longer clip of what he had to say about the sugar water so that you can see it in context.

And then, of course none of these clips are what he said right next to me as we had less than thirty seconds and the music was planning to go out, and Alex kind of sand bag me as the program was ending, and he said, you know, there, we've got to get the good vaccine from Trump. And he's like, what is he talking about? But I'd had somebody who had already told me that he was pushing the idea that Trump had a different vaccine, that it was a good vaccine. But

here is a longer clip so you can get some context. Trump takes control from Gates of the vaccine process. He's been able to get cleaner, weaker vaccines for those that want it. He's then able to keep the economy going and and try to break COVID hysteria a stronger, weaker and the fraud's back before the election, which he's now doing through the CDC. He's taking control up. So thank god he's contradicting Redfield. Thank god he's hundred defauci.

Thank god you didn't fire him. There's sports of other scientists that are coming out and back you didn't fire me. So Trump's doing everything real behind the scenes and out in the open, but you're fake win out of there. You're the faith one. Ola Harris Killobiden, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton saying I would not trust anything he says, do not take a vaccine from Trump. And now because Trump's to control of the CDC, he's getting control.

Gates goes, trust my vaccine, but don't trust the CDC's vaccine. And I went and't look at that that Trump's looking at their Are you making that up? House attenuated classic viruses and that's not a classic virus. A low amount of adjuvant in it, you lying piece of filth, And what is adjuvate? It makes your body have an autoimmune response, because a lot of times I have a vaccine's week, which again doesn't hurt you as bad.

You're not gonna have the autom in response. They're going to form antibodies. So they've got to give you the squalen or the mercury or the aluminum to trigger that. And so yeah, Trump's looking at basically sugar water for folks, Can we take a little bit of an attenuated, microwaved or radiated COVID deal abs freaking lately? You know you're lying, Well, it's already everwhere anyways, you know you're lying. Look, first of all, Alex pretended

that the vaccine that the virus had been isolated. It was never isolated. Alex and everybody knew because Trump had had a little program We're going around the table and they said, no, we'll do it with mRNA. We've been talking about that for months and so, uh, it's not a classic virus

dead or weakened pathogen, not at all. And even if it were sugar water, Alex had spent decades talking about how mercury and aluminum and things like that that they put in, how that was giving people autism and many immune system things. You talked about that for years. For years he had talked about the annual flu scam and how they tried to scare people into getting a flu exam. Every bit of that was a lie. I'm surprised that Michael

John fell for it. I commented to him and I said to Michael John, I put this up on my Twitter channel. I said, so, what is more? And he came back and he said, well, I wasn't really coming after Alex. I was coming after Ben Shapiro and other people for telling people, you know, go ahead and take the vaccine. And I said, so, what is more pathetic Ben Shapiro and other people telling you to get an untested vaccine because science? Or is it more pathetic that

Alex Jones tells you to get the untested vaccine because Trump? Which one of those is more pathetic? Seriously, as a matter of fact, a comedian, I think laid it out Trump. Sorry, you're able to get cleaner, weaker vaccine. Oh we don't have hang on, I got that clip in there twice. Can you play the Trump juice clip? Do you have that the one that you were getting rid of the curse word that was in it? You beeped down. That's in there twice. Anyway, Trump give

him the credit that he wants. Alex, Oh, that's not playing either. Okay, we got some problems, so he said, he said, well, the problem is the context. And I said, well, here's the context. Michael I worked for Alex. I didn't believe it at first, and people contacted me and told me that he was telling people that Trump had a safe vaccine, and then he did it with me sitting right next to him. And then I told people that, and they called me a

liar for years, called me a liar for years. And so somebody sent me this, and so what he's saying as well, I got a disgruntled employee. I said, it was not me. Somebody sent me that sugar water clip. I was glad to have it. But you know, even though you put that up, you still get people who follow Trump, people who love Alex. They don't want to believe their eyes, they don't want to believe their ears. They hate me for telling them the truth. And

I'm going to keep telling you the truth. So keep hating me. I'm not going to let this stuff go. I said, Alex knew it was mRNA and he knew that it was unlike any other jab it was not a weekend pathogen. He pretended that COVID had been isolated, that it had been ramped up with gain of function so he could sell prepper items. Alex also knew that the adjuvants say, we're saying it's not a problem. It's just got some mercury stuff in there. He said, that's not a problem.

Well, he knew that was a problem. And he also knew that there was no secret alternative vaccine being developed. Nobody said that. He made that garbage up, just like Key and Steve A. Chinnik sold everybody the fact that there was some secret sting. You know, a few months later around

the election. Two days after the election, he makes up the idea that there's some secret sting and there's some undercover global war that's going on with white hats and black hats, that they had twenty eight thousand National Guard out there resting people. He made all of that stuff up so he could start his next grift. Stop the steal. Two of Alex's biggest grifts in one year. Disgusting people's lives were destroyed. Many of them have died suicide, because

of this January the sixth stuff. Alex knew there was no secret alternative thing. He knew that there was no secret stuff anywhere with that And as a matter of fact, a comedian, we've got this fixed. Thanks, thanks, Travis made the vaccine. You love Trump, you would have got the thing that was his baby warp speech. Excuse me, warp sport. You all have warp speed in you right now. You have Trump juice inside your body. Warp speed so quick. It was supposed to take five years,

but I made it in two days. You have experimental Trump juice in your body, fuolting around whoop speed. Nobody makes you dumpach. Nobody feels tiny when they got big, very big. If I like Trump, I'd be like, give you that Patriot pitch, Give it to me. Come on, you've got my NRA tattoo on my mRNA tattoo, Come on right again his NRA tattoo and is m RNA tattoo? Does Alex have an mRNA tattoo

on the other side as well? And look, I guess in a certain way, I'm the father of the vaccine because I was the one that pushed it. I pushed the FDA like they have never been pushed before. I wouldn't exactly stay there. They're in love with me. The vaccine is one of the greatest achievements of mankind. All of the countries of the world who are now getting the vaccine or soon will be getting it. Yeah, yeah, father vaccine or the father of lies? Who's come to steal? Who's

come to lie? To destroy? Which is it? Which one is he? And who are we talking about? These people who are covering for them? Right? What team are they playing on? Well, we've got the so called second Gentleman, Doug Mhoff, who is married. I guess they're married to La La Harris. He tested positive for COVID. Imagine that. I wonder how many boosters he has had, and maybe it's the boosters that they're testing. I don't know how many he's had. But let's end this

segment with some positive news, and there is. We keep seeing news about things like NATO knays and other things that help with the blood clots that are

Is this natural supplement that's been used for cognitive and memory function useful for combatting clotting effects of jab?

a big issue. This is a new one that I had not seen before. Gink Go bill oba. If I'm pronouncing that correctly, I know I have a hard time saying that, But anyway, it's also known as maidenhair tree. Native to China, Japan, Korea, now grown into Europe and the United States. The leaves and the seeds from the tree have been used for thousands of years in traditional Chinese medicine, are still used today and supplement s remedies, and primarily they've used it in the past to help people improve

their memory and their cognitive function. I may send some of these things to biden as well as to alleviate symptoms of anxiety, glaucoma, and dementia. It's believed to improve blood flow to the brain and may help ease circulation problems. Some studies have suggested that it may also help with memory problems caused by dementia or Alzheimer's disease. However, another possible benefit of Ginko biloba is the

fibrinolytic effects. In other words, it prevents blood clots from growing, and it may ameliorate the micro clots and subsequent fibrosis caused by the covid spike protein which covid vaccines induce in the body induce the body to manufacture after injection. So I don't sell this stuff. I'm not giving you medical advice. I know that some things like nanocnaes, and there's another one that was from China. It was active ingredient they extracted from ground up particular earthworm they had in

China that he used as an anticoagulant. And so there's some of these things that are out there, and people have been taking some of these for in theory to say, well, maybe this will help because blood clots are such an issue with these trump shots. I think time will have to tell whether or not that's effective, but at least this is something that you can try.

If you listen to some loud mouth grifter tell you that it was sugar water, you might want to try some of these other things in your desperation. We're gonna have to a quick break and we will be right back up. Liberty, it's your move. And now the David Knight Show, Well, welcome back, and we've got some good news about cars. Yes, the people who are trying to take everything from us, including our transportation or continuing along with their plan, but other people have other plans as well.

Even though they have laid these things out for a long period of time, even though they have practiced them. Of people to improvise and to overcome is something to be seen, and of course God has the final say and what these people are doing. I'm always encouraged to see euvil Harari speak as he shakes his fist against God. I can almost hear God laughing. I can hear him laughing in his word of people who are like that. On Rumble Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip, writes, I'm not sure exactly

what this project twenty twenty five is. What we want is reform and justice, not vengeance. We all know how the Patriot Act came about and who it was used against. Yeah, he was Choos against the Patriots. That's right. We want to know more of this. These calls irresponsible, useless, unproductive, calls for vengeance, for revenge, and that's coming from Trump again, a guy who is incapable of acting, as his former lad said, except out of his own perceived self interest or out of revenge. And

so yeah, we don't want that. But let's talk a little bit about how some people are acting to actually out maneuver these people who are trying to take away our transportation across Europe. Automatic speed limiters are coming this week. They start putting them in cars. And this is coming from North American house. Hippo, thank you for sending this to me. New car is going to be fitted with automatic speed limitters across Europe beginning this week. Can they

be turned off? And this is coming from a UK paper which points out that the law will not apply in the UK. Why well, because they had Brexit and the establishment and the left is still so upset about Brexit. This is a wine Press story actually, but he got the information out of the UK. But yeah, Brexit, they already took that exit before they got to this point. They took the Brexit right off of the EU Express

headed towards tyranny. So the question is can they be turned off or will the new Labor government weaponize that because the Brits are going to be getting their cars from Europe, they'll come with this equipment on there. Well, the UK under the Labor government, which these leftists and the Greens and the communists, the green communists, a watermelon party, that's what they should call it. They have the thin veneer of green on the inside. They're completely red

and that's what communist is read. It's not maga. Those people just they don't know anything. They don't know and they don't know that throughout history the Communists have used read they call themselves Red State this and Red State That's crazy,

how naive they are, how ignorant they are of history. Anyway, even though the rule to install all the technologies is not applying, the UK made of the cars what have been made in Europe and so will feature what they call the Intelligent Speed Assistance. Anyway, the technology allows a car to automatically restrict its speed based on GPS location, speed sign recognition, and cameras

within the vehicle. So again you've seen we've all got different apps that are maps, and it doesn't matter whether it's Ways or it's Google, and there's some other ones that I've used. They all know what the speed limit, They know your location and they know what the speed limit is there, and so they can either throttle your car or they can send off a message to the police and tell them to send you a ticket. You know, it's just a question of when they want to try to roll out this technology and

where and what people will do. Will people accept this or not? Well, we have an innovation coming from one company. This is actually on Breitbart a new kind of a different kind of EV. Instead of a battery EV, this is a hydrogen fuel cell EV Semi Semi and Walmart in Canada is going to start testing these, and I think that's a very positive development.

All of these new technologies, as far as I'm concerned, they've got all of them have major technological issues that have been solved a long time ago with internal combustion engines, both gasoline and diesel, and there is no reason to have any of these. I don't believe any of this CO two stuff. It's all nonsense. Zero point zero four percent of the atmosphere and only three percent of that zero point zero four percent is man made according to these idiots.

They've got all these false prophecies that I've seen for more than fifty years in my life. It's now fifty fifty four years. Yeah so' and I've watched climate Gate and all the rest of the stuff. These people run like a vampire from a crucifix whenever you ask them for their data, because that's what they are. They're bloodsucking parasites telling us lies. And so I don't have any interest in any of this climate mcguffin. However, you know,

one way to defeat these people. If you can't do it in the legislature because they're all on the take, one way that you can do it is you can have some engineers out there say Okay, you want electric vehicle, I can do that, and I can do it without you having range issues and without you having to set there for hours to charge up your massive semi trailer. And so Walmart has reportedly deployed it's first hydrogen fuel cell powered Nicola

Tray semi truck. So, I guess you know everybody is trying to steal Tessa's name. Uh so they call there Nikolha. Hydrogen technology stands as a potential competitor to EV trucks. Actually it's not, it is an EV truck itself. It stands as a competitor to the battery model. And so I kind of like this because they're beating them at their own zero emissions game. Oh you say, you're not gonna let us have anything nless the zero missions

will hear something that you don't control through the centralized grid. That's the whole purpose of the battery EV is to control it through the grid, And they jealously attack any other technology because they want you to have to go through It's just like what they did with the vaccine. So you can't have HCQ, you can't have ibermakten, you can't have anything. You gotta wait, got to get the vaccine. Well, you got to have the battery car.

Only the battery car will do. Electrec reports that Walmart Canada has introduced the first hydrogen fuel cell electric semi truck to its fleet. The move makes Walmart Canada the first major retail chain in North America to adopt this cutting edge technology. Now, the good news is that if it's Walmart, they may start. If they're going to use this, they're going to have to roll out an infrastructure of places where you can charge it up with hydrogen. And if

they roll that out, they might sell it to other people. That's the big chicken and egg thing, right, which comes first. And so they're pushing out these evs because you could charge them at home. You don't have any way to charge something that's a hydrogen vehicle at home, so you do have to have that, but they should be able to do that fairly easily.

Again, it's all money and technology versus government mandates is what we're talking about, and you know, the government has put out billions of dollars, is only produced a seven or eight gas station charging stations for electric vehicles. Unbelievable the amount of incompetence and waste that these people can't even put something together

to make their own system operate. The deployment of the Nicola Trey hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicle as part of Walmart Canada's ambitious plans to transition to one percent alternative fuel fleet. It's expensive, it's unnecessary, but it's one way to get around their controls. Boast a range of approximately four hundred miles per tain and the time to refuel. So that's about the same or maybe a little bit more from what I could tell of what some of my trucks range are.

I don't know. I'm not a truck driver. I'm sure you know we have people who are truck drivers for the love of the road is I'm sure he'll correct me with us and he'll have some more up to date information. But from what I could tell, it seemed to be about the same range, about the same amount of time to fill it up as it would be for a diesel truck or a gasoline truck. A ough, they don't use gasoline, but you know, to pump it with literal gas instead of

gasoline. To pump it with hydrogen gas would take about the same amount of time as to fill it with diesel. It takes about five minutes, they said. But they said, well, you know, real world, they may be skeptical a little bit about these numbers. From what I could tell, it seems to take about five to fifteen minutes for them to fill up a large semi trailer, because I think they'd give them faster pumps than they give us at the car stations. But again, you know, five to

fifteen minutes, ten minutes would be right in the center of that. And so it's in the same ballpark, in other words, of filling up your car with a liquid petroleum product or you know, and the same range that you would have. So problem solved and it would be zero emissions. So why are they going to complain about next they will? I mean, it's just like the pronoun stuff you use their pronouns. We'll find something else to jerk you around with. And then this story, this is my favorite one.

In Philadelphia. You have a car shelter, they call it they're treating the car sens if they are abused and discarded animals. They call it a no Kill car shelter in Philadelphia, taking in broken down vehicles that were bound for the trash heap and then transforming them into ferocious road demons reminiscent of Mad Max. The No Kill Shelter has recently gained a rabbit following on Instagram. Pull it up and show people some of the pictures of some of these hybrid

things that they put together. It kind of reminds me of us Sid's Toys Toy Story, some of these things. Yeah, scroll down there a little bit and there's now that one doesn't look too bad. It's elevated. That one's pretty rusty. And you know, I've seen a lot of rust buckets at the car shows that they're having. Austin, they had a huge one. They had a lot of what they called rat rods. They'd be all rusty, and people didn't send them down or paint them. They would just

you know, make hot rods into that type of thing. The No Kill Shelter has recently gained a rabid following on Instagram with the revamped speed Demons conquering the road of the Roads of Port Richmond and eye catching videos at garnered millions of views. The founder, Brian Smith forty two, is pleased with his shop's newfound fame, thanks largely to his business partner and social media manager, but Smith said that he'd like to keep pursuing his passion even if the limelight

disappears. It's about keeping as many of these cars going as possible. Out of the shop's many mean machines, the two that have garnered the most attention are what he deems to be the no Mad Max is originally a fifth Chevy Nomad we saw that one, and the Seneca, a nineteen sixty Dodge Dart on top of a nineteen eighty four Chevy C thirty dually dump truck chassis so

kind of interesting. Both these cars were destined for the scrapyard, but their motto is keep old Iron Alive, and there's no way they could let him die. The crew also works on vintage cars, like a nineteen fifty nine Cadillac Sadandeville, which Smith is happy to sell for ten thousand dollars to anybody who is interested. The two were inspired to start what they called a is a car club. They called it the Dead Beaters car Club. Several of

their friends they jokingly called it a drinking club with a car problem. Had. The Dead Beaters were bound together by the love of old, beat up cars that didn't have shiny paint jobs. It's exactly the opposite of what Obama started with his cash for clunkers. And I said when he did it, I was not on the at the time, but I said to everybody, did I said this? They want to get rid of transportation. They've made it clear at that point. I mean they've been talking about getting rid of

cars going back to before the first Earthday in nineteen seventy. We got to get rid of cars. Cars are the worst thing that ever happened. You know. They got the guy who is the CEO for Lift. He was an urban planner. He said, the best invention of mankind was the city, and the worst invention was the automobile. It's no the automobile allowed people to escape the city, which was the worst invention. What this guy loves as an urban planner, and they took that ticket right away. That's why

we had the suburbs. Everybody voted in opposition to this guy is what the best and worst inventions were. But they've always wanted to stop that. These urban planners have always talked about urban sprawl as if we're supposed to all be in cities and if we're in the suburbs or in the rural areas, oh, that's just sprawl. We got to stop that sprawl. Got to concentrate everybody, control everybody's lives is always been there. Getting rid of cars has

always been there. So when Obama put through the cash for clunkers, I said, watch it. It's just trying to get rid of spare parts. He's trying to get rid of the automobiles. It could be easily fixed. But this is the future. We're gonna have to learn how to fix these cars and keep them going, and who cares what they look like? Quite frankly, rock Fann, thank you very much, Eric, I appreciate the tip. And on Rumble, neuro divergent one says David, could you and

Travis put links for these clips in the rebroadcast or in the comments? Please links for the clips? Does you mean the video clips? I guess yeah, okay, all right, yeah, I'll take a look at it. I'd run through this stuff pretty quickly. Most of these things I pulled off of Twitter, so you know, you can look on Twitter and you can or they're in the articles, so they're either in the articles or on Twitter or both, and so if you look up some of the stuff you can

find it. I don't know, I've had that clip about the comedian and the Trump juice for so long. I don't know where I got that from. I've played that first time years ago, but the other ones are all recent clips that are everywhere. We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about the Second Amendment, which

is now under attack. And it's very interesting because the Meses Institute, which is not a radical organization, just like Heritage Foundation is not a radical organization. But the headline from the mess Institute says, the ATF is out there killing people again, and they're absolutely right. It's not sensationalism. We'll be

right back making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show Welcome back, and Neurodivergen said, I've had a hard time finding some of the videos to help break the spell Trump has on so many of my friends and family. You know. A while were break, I saw that and I thought, well, here's one way that you're can do it. I see this a lot of times. There'll be a large video speech somebody's giving this an hour long or something like that, and they'll give people a timecoat as

to where the clip starts. So you could do that. You could give them the clip and tell them about where it starts. And I do on a regular basis. We put it up. First, we put up the show before we've got the full description, and then I do a description and it says, you know, about how many minutes and we start talking about

this other topic, that type of thing. So I kind of get you in the ballpark since it's such a long program, and so people can see what is being discussed at different parts of the program and they can jump to that content. If they're not interested in something that I'm talking to, they can go the next thing. And so if you look at that, that'll kind of give you an idea roughly where it is, and you know you can find it within there. But I apologize it takes us a while to

do that. So what I've been doing is I've been putting it up with no descriptions saying the description is coming, and then we get the description done, the transcription done, and we go through and find the time codes. Two or three hours later, I put up that, and I don't know if that gets pumped out. Then again with the with the different podcasts,

if the podcas, if they get the update to that or not. If you don't get the update to that, then you can go directly to where it is hosted and you can find it there at that point in time where you listen to it and what's us up. He usually takes us about three four hours to get those up. Let's talk about the Second Amendment, and we have the public health official that Biden has put in, vive Ak Murphy,

who said that gun owners are a disease. That's funny because I think that government, especially the unconstitutional public health bureaucrats like Murthy, I think their disease. I think their disease has killed far more people in twenty twenty than all of the gunshots over the entire history of America. And I would include the wars as well. The outright war is a civil war, warren wars,

everything else. You people, murthy, you and the Trump administration you, the Biden administration and the Trump administration have killed more people with your drugs. How dare you try to take away our god given right to defend ourselves. Until nineteen ninety six, this is from American thinker, one of the primary tactics of anti liberty gun activists was to treat criminal misuse of guns as well as accidents and suicides as a public health matter. And so they're going

to come after it as a public health emergency. And you've heard this rhetoric over and over again, he said. Fortunately, in nineteen ninety six, this language was inserted into a budget bill. Quote, none of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the CDC may be used to advocate or to promote gun control. Well, there you go. So this guy is a surgeon general under Biden. You know, Congress can restrict money if

they want to. They could restrict money for a lot of this transgender grooming stuff. They could have restricted money for what Trump was incentivizing even in twenty twenty, the lockdowns, the mass the social distancing, the vaccines. They always have the power of the purse, but they refuse to use it, which is a form of consent for what is being done. It is certainly consent when Trump provides the funds, just as it is consent when Congress refuses

to stop the funding of these activities. I'm sick and tired of Jim Jordan and his dog and pony shows, and he never does anything, and nobody ever does anything. Mike Johnson fully on board with these people. As a matter of fact, they could replace Laala, Harris and Biden with a number three in line, Mike Johnson, and nobody would ever notice. Be the same policies, folks, same policies. So that simple sentence, and none of these funds are going to be used to promote gun control by the CDC

drove supposed medical scientists obsessed with gun control, drove them underground. They still did anti gun advocacy and quote unquote research using public funds. They were just quiet about it. They funneled money and research through NGO's and other anti gun groups. An NPR article talked about how for more than a quarter of a century they've done all they can to circumvent the law. And now this Surgeon General so called issues and Advisory on the Public Health Crisis of firearm violence in

the United States. Today, US Surgeon General doctor i Vaivek Murphy released a landmark Surgeon General's advisory on firearm violence, declaring firearm violence in America to be a public health crisis. You are a public health crisis, mirthy, Why do we have these people? And again, the guy that the Trump had as a surgeon general, he was an underling of Mike Pence, and he was one of the most rapid, rabid liars in operational warp speed and the

rest of this stuff just disgusting what he was pushing. Firearm violence is pervasive, he said, more than half fifty four percent of US adults or their family members having experienced a firearm related incident in their lives. Do you believe that there's absolutely no way that that's true, Absolutely no way that is true. These people always do this kind of stuff. I saw them doing it at the EPA in Research Trongle Park in North Carolina, where I lived and

had worked. I saw them telling people we got more people dying of fine particulate matter than we do of cancer and heart disease. And I'm not talking congressmen about people getting sick. I'm saying they're dying and more people are dying from this stuff that we want to ban now, So they could ban diesel fuel, and so they could ban fireplaces, so they could ban barbecue grills, so they could ban restaurants cooking in a grill type of situation. There's

more people dying from this stuff than from heart disease and cancer. And it was a total lie. It was an absurd lie. This is an absurd lie. Do you think I mean, if it's fifty four percent, that means that you probably know several families, several families where people have been killed with firearms. It's just nonsense, absolute nonsense. It's not like cancer and

heart attack at all. That fifty four percent figure was derived from a telephone poll of twelve hundred and seventy one English speakers and seventy three Spanish speakers. Those doing the polling claim that it is a nationally representative sample, but they published nothing on the geographical distribution of the poll. Was this in like a bad neighborhood in Chicago, for example? Could be could be looking to quote Mark Twain, there's lies, there's damn lies, and then there's polls.

That's not what he said, but that is essentially what we're looking at here. You can get a poll to say anything that you want and it's absolute nonsense. But this is the article I was talking about earlier from the Mesa's Institute. The ATF has resumed openly murdering Americans. And this is not a clickbait headline. This is real. And they talk about the fact that we had Ruby Ridge in ninety two and then we had Waco nineteen ninety three.

You know, it's kind of interesting we talk about those conservatives will get really upset, and rightfully so, about the Clinton administration, about Janet Reno and about Waco. And there were more people that were killed at Waco than at Ruby Ridge. But it was the same bureaucracy. They were operating under two

different presidents. At Ruby Ridge, the ATF was operating under George H. W. Bush, George the first and then same people pulled off this thing at Waco under Clinton and Janet Reno and the conservatives, most conservatives didn't really talk about Ruby Ridge much. They may basically just talked about Waco and Janet Reno and all the rest of this stuff. Again, this kind of blindness, partisan blindness has been around for a very long time. The Mesa's Institute

says later as they cooled their trigger fingers. The ATF side game of deliberately allowing guns to flow into Mexico for quote unquote tracking purposes was exposed in the Fast Infurious scandal after two of these guns turned up near the scene of the killing of Brian Terry, a border patrol officer in twenty ten. And it put in parentheses a whole lot of good this tracking did. Huh. That's

right. By the way, it was called Fast and Furious under Obama, under George the Second, under George W. Bush, it was called the gun Walker program again, you know, just like George H. W. Bush as Ruby Ridge and the same people under Clinton run Waco. Under George W. Bush, they had the gun Walker program, and then it became the Fast and Furious program. You know. That happened in twenty ten, and I recall I think it was either twenty eleven or twenty twelve. It

was right after it was. This is all set up as the reason they did this, and the New York Times even said it was a false flag attack to try to push through the UN arms trade treaty. The UN said we got all these small arms that are going across the borders, and we got to stop it. You know, we're not too worried about hundreds of billions of dollars and big moms and other things like that going to Ukraine and to Israel. No, we got to worry about the firearms going across the

US and Mexico border. And in order to control those, we've got to mark and identify every single gun and every bit of ammunition. That's what they were trying to make the case for. So they did a false flag attack. That was a purpose of it, except it blew up and they got a federal agent killed. So then at that point they cared about it. And because that blew up in their face and they were going to have a vote on the un Arms Trade treaty. I think it was in twenty twelve.

I think it was in the spring of twenty twelve. My family and I were up there doing video for the National Association Gun Rights as they were doing interviews with the gun manufacturers and stuff to try to stop this un Arms Trade treaty thing. And the week before, exactly one week before they were to have the vote, you had that very very very very suspicious or Colorado

shooting where the guy is like in a trance. He's a psychology student, and he was, you know, he'd gotten the money for his grant in a national competition. He was a pretty sharp guy at one point in time. But then when they got to him, he's like this zoned out weirdo and he's warning them that his apartment is booby trapped, and all the rest

of this stuff is like how did he turn into that? But one week before the un Arms Trade Treaty, in order to try to get people to forget about the fast and furious death of the Bard patrol agent, they ran this shooting through. I'm absolutely convinced of that. The timing of it was just amazing. But they still lost. They still lost, and so they

keep coming in different ways. Going back to the Mesa's Institute article. In more recent years, ATS's favorite pastime has been to send several car loads worth of thugs LARPing with full tactical gear to raid and intimidate American licensed gun dealers for suppose in fractions of federal firearms and to confiscate their property. Jim Skelton had his business rated in twenty twenty one after a federal and trapping weasel,

lied on the federal background check forms and successfully purchased several firearms. A whole lot of good this background check did, right, So you know they're on the background check, they get an okay. But because the guy lied on his form, they come after the guy who had him fill out the form, the guy who ran the background check, they still come after him. He's still responsible. Sounds like we're playing by IRS rules here, doesn't it.

Russell Fincher was raided at his home in twenty twenty three, one of the reasons being that he sold firearms without a federal firearms license even though he had one. He was yelled at, he was threatened, and he was ultimately intimidated into giving up his license. However, lately, the ATF has been reminiscing about the good old days. Just a couple of months ago,

they raided the home of Brian Malanowski, shot and killed him. Malanowski, executive director of the Clinton National Airport in Little Rock, was an avid gun collector and would frequent gun shows to buy and sell firearms with other private individuals. Now, the Mesa's Institute is maybe too polite to say it and maybe

he doesn't want to get labeled a conspiracy theorist. I don't care. What I'll say is, if somebody is an executive director at the Clinton National Airport in Little Rock, maybe the reason he got shot was not because of some firearm violation, because there was no firearm violation here. They might have been trying to hide something else, running drugs through that area anyway, But he was an avid gun collector. He would frequent gun shows to buy and sell

firearms with other private individuals. All of that's completely legal, and it does not require a federal firearms license. His frequent buying and selling of guns, however, prompted the ATF to consider him as quote engaging in the business of selling firearms unquote and therefore violating a federal law by not having an FFL. Nobody knows what the actual threshold is. How many guns do you need to buy or sell before you need to have that FFL. Well, we don't

know. I guess if they told you did have to kill you. They thus obtained a search warrant and proceeded to serve it in the most dangerous way possible, even though they knew his workplace. His work schedule his phone number. Oh, this is very much like Waco, right. They knew David Koresh's schedule. As a matter of fact, the sheriff that was there, he had been involved, and other allegations and trials he'd served warrants to him

had shown up. He'd gone to these trials and a lot of the stuff that the ATF was talking about had been he'd stood trial forward and they found him not guilty and things like that. Well, they didn't accord him that. Instead, what they did was they came in like gangbusters, like they did with this guy. Even though they knew that they could have served him these papers anywhere, they decided they would do it Waco style. They showed

up at his house completely unannounced, an hour before sunrise. They covered up the doorbell camera, They cut their electricity. Then they loudly banged on his door before breaking it down while Melanowski and his wife were asleep. The ATF deliberately created a situation in which any reasonable person would assume that his home was being invaded by a gang of violent thugs, which in this case was true,

except these violent thugs had badges. Badges ain't got no stinking badgets, he would be legally and morally justified in taking appropriate self defense measures by shooting the intruders, which he did. One ATF agent was hit, but the gang of which there was roughly ten car loads ten car loads of agents, they all returned fire, hitting him in the head. Naturally, they confiscate

a bunch of his property. Afterward. Representative Dan Goldman, Democrat of New York expressed his anchor that Republicans would criticize the ATF over this because he said they retaliated with deadly force after someone shot an ATF agent, who, by the way, at the time was a violent intruder. These no knock rades. Again, this is a nightmare that has been unleashed on us that was anticipated only in satire by Monty Python in Brazil before they unleashed the stuff as

regular standard procedure. And then to Debbie Schultz, a Democrat from Florida, remarked there are far too many loopholes from buying a gun, and then later said, isn't it true that clerical errors can often be serious problems to cause guns to fall into criminal hands? How do you explain the ATF having guns?

Then you don't vet these people, how about training them later? In a separate hearing with the ATF director Stephen Duttelbach, Jim Jordan, Jim Jordan, Well, you can always count on Jim Jordan to give him a good tongue lashing and nothing else. Nothing else from Jim Jordan. He put Dottlebock's feet to the proverbial fire by questioning him about the policy of federal officers while executing search warrants to have body cameras on which were distinctly missing, and the

malinofsky murder. But of course Jordan and Congress continue to fund the ATF. Nobody will have any consequences for this. Nobody will have any consequences for breaking into an American's home and murdering him. And they won't have their budget cut either. Nothing will be done. Thank you, Jim Jordan. You're such a good example of the useless GOP, if ever there was one. And

so what are people doing in response to this? Well, there was an interesting article on the Daily Mail about Christian warrior training as they call it, and a lot of churches are looking at this and saying, well, we need to do something to protect our own people. They call it sheepdog training

in many cases. And there's actually a company called sheep Dog Church Security and founded by Chris Maloney in twenty fourteen, is a company that trains volunteers safety and secure volunteer safety and security teams to protect houses of worship hall keeping faith at the center. That is a very important thing. I've talked about this for a very long time, and we've had a few church shootings and some

of them were worse than others. You know, even when you got a security team, that doesn't mean that guy can't get off one sucker shot, but it means they can't kill the whole group. On rumble marky Mark from New Jersey, thank you for the tip, he said, we have over one thousand viewers in the house. Well, thank you very much, thank you for letting me know that, and thank you to all of you for watching. And by the way, please like the stream. That helps us

to get the numbers up even more. And I just want to tell you that you can find out about the Roku channel if you'd like to watch there at some point in time, you can look up the David Knight Show and Roku and should take you to that if you have a Roku device, but there's a lot of different places where you can find the show, and we have those links and as well as places where you can support the show at the David Knightshow dot com. But let's talk about this Christian Warrior training thing.

When he first founded the company back in twenty fourteen, Maloney didn't have much competition. But now ten years later, church attacks are at an all time high and the protection street is booming. I covered this from a guy whose name is charl van Vic. He's from South Africa. I've talked to him a couple of times. He wrote a book back in the nineteen nineties about a mass shooting that happened there when the ANC and the Communists were when

they had to open revolt with gorillas and stuff like that. And he was a Christian missionary operating an independent and he was operating there and you know, there was a very violent time during that point time. It had a lot of terrorists taking pot shots of people. There was a racial component to it

as well. He thought, well, you know, he struggled with the idea of whether or not he should as a Christian protect his life and other people's lives and he thought about he that, yeah, I think that's not only a reasonable thing, but it's what I need to do. And so he got a pistol and he trained with it, and one Sunday he was

visiting a liberal church in South Africa. Later on, these guys when they had when it was all over and they had Nelson Mandela safely ensconced as a communist leader, they had truth and reconciliation things where they said we'll give you amnesty, just come forward and talk and tell us what you did, and no penalties for anybody. And so the people who pulled this off said their truth and reconciliation hearing, they said, we did this because we figured this

is a prosperous liberal white church and we figured nobody there'd be harmed. But they said, we ranted all kinds of opposition. They came in the side door throwing grenades grenades and then sprang the people in the church building with fully automatic gunfire. They immediately killed fifty to sixty people. And charl Vonwick was always was in the back. He's just visiting this church. He wasn't a

member. He was all the way in the back. He had a pistol with only five bullets in it. So when anybody tells you, oh, well, we got to ban all these you know, salt weapons, all the rest of the stuff. I mean, just like that situation on the mall where he had a guy stop an individual who had I think he had two ars with him and a pistol and things like that, and this guy took him out with a pistol himself and saved a lot of lives. Anyway, charl was in the back of the church and so I've got to do

something. So he pulls out his pistol, he gets down on his knee and he takes a shot, and then I'm not going to be able to hit anybody from this distance, and so he goes out the back and it comes around the side of the building and he sees these guys standing there, and he takes a couple more shots at him, and they all ran away. And the Truth and Reconciliation thing, they said, we thought there were multiple shooters defending the place, and that first shot that he thought was just

kind of a no chance is going to hit anything. That hit one of the guys. And as they're pulling him back, they get fire from the sun and it's all charl and he's only got five bullets. I did a first report I did from him about a decade ago. I titled it five Bullets to Save a thousand people, because when they talked about the truth and Reconciliation thing, they said their intention was to kill every last person in that

church, and they had the weapons and the ammunition to do it. They were going to go pew to pew executing people because nobody had the means of defense. Now, he wrote a book about that, and he wrote it in the nineteen nineties, a couple of decades after it had happened, and he said, this is coming to American You need to prepare for a lot of people didn't. A lot of people did not listen to that, but they're listening now. So Maloney, who has a background the military law enforcement,

initially ran a safety team at his own church in Minnesota. Since then, he has trained over six thousand people to protect houses of worship nationwide. He said, you want the church to be church, ser is to be open and welcoming and so forth, and yet you want to provide safety and security needed. So those of us who do carry firearms, we do so on a concealed basis. We have the protection we need, yet we're not

ostentatious about it. See very low key, you do it concealed. As a matter of fact, when you look at the chart of violent incidents and churches, it has surged from fifty in twenty eighteen to four hundred and thirty six and twenty twenty three, it's going up exponentially. In twenty twenty two it was two hundred and its sored up more than double. So it is something that people need to do. He says, if you just google church

security that this said, there'll be one hundred thousand hits. His program offers a manual on safety drills for churches, helps to build out what many people call safety ministries, a combination of armed and unarmed volunteers ready to respond to emergencies, whether it's a medical case requiring CPR or whether it is a shooter

in the building. The Practical Drill and Scenario Training Manual consists of hands on approach to managing emergency situation, from de escalating disruptive situations to managing bomb threats and active shooter incidents. It also includes theoretical understanding and practical application a holistic approach to safety training, and I'll just put this in here. You know, you have a responsibility to protect your life and the life of your family

and perhaps people in your neighborhood as well. That's one of the reasons why I like to recommend to people the Civil Defense Manual by Jack Lawson. I go to Civil Defensemanual dot com, a two volume set. He only sells it as a set together, and he covers a wealth of things from natural emergencies to you know, even nuclear war. If you're not in the initial blast, how do you survive once the grid is down? How do you survive with a cloud of fallout coming towards you? A lot of different things.

And it's not all just from him. He's got a lot of contributors talking about their area of expertise and those manuals as well. You should always prepare, always prepare to protect yourself and your family. That's the same thing that Charles Vunwick did. And God will use people like that just like he

used Charles. This guy's advertisements include an image of a handgun on top of a holy Bible as he's billed as the protector of the people and guardian of the church, and so when you look at how this is escalating, he said. The crimes against religious institutions, he says, fall into two categories. Some of these are just random crimes, but some of them are targeted

attacks. The target attacks, he said, are part of a changing attitude toward churches, a significant decline in public respect for religious authority over the years. He said, when I was a teenager, churches were essentially unlocked twenty four to seven. Even as a kid who was not exactly a good kid, I never occurred. It never occurred to me to go to into a church and do something stupid like that. But he said, now we've got

public leaders and politicians never say a thing. I used to never say anything about bad against church or against Christians, but now it's very common. He said. I think as time has gone by, the general respect for religious authority has diminished greatly. Well, it's the respect for God that has diminished. There is no religious authority outside of God, so attacking a church building is no longer off limits. That's what it's come down to, he said.

Family Research Council found acts of hostility against churches more than doubled between twenty twenty two and twenty twenty three. And as I just said, and it's not just Christian churches. Jewish community is already familiar with the history of security threats and attacks have seen heightened vigilance since the two thousand eighteen Pittsburgh's synagogue shooting

that killed eleven people. He says some congregations might resist the idea of security teams, fearing an over militarized presence, you know, just like Charles Vnwick had some issues at first. He said, some religious congregants believe Christians should be pacifists and don't believe in using weapons to protect themselves. He says others have very anti gun sentiments. Well, here's the reality. You know, if somebody is somebody is going to be attacked, somebody is going to be

killed. You don't think that you could stop it, that you would want to stop it, that you would lift a finger to help them. How is that Christian? It isn't. It isn't. And if you're going to do something to stop it, you have to have a little bit of preparation in order to be able to do that effectively. One person said, can you serve God and guns? I don't think you can. He said, I think you've got to make a choice. Is absolutely wrong. You know, a lot of people say, well, money is the root of all

evil. No, Jesus said, it was the love of money that's the root of all evil. Jesus talked a great deal about money and about how to handle it properly, not to make it something that you worship, not to make it the god of your life. But just as money is necessary for us to know how to handle it properly in order to be able to provide for our own and to be able to help other people. In the same way, guns in and of themselves are not evil, just like money

is not evil. The love of guns can be evil, just like the love of money. But if you don't make a god out of it, if it is in your eyes a means of provision and protection, then it's a good thing. As a matter of fact. One of the things in this article they show a picture of a woman. Remember the incident at your Lostein's church. A woman shows up in a trench coat, she had a kid with her. She started shooting at people and all that kind of stuff,

and had some off duty police officers who are working security. They put her down, stopped the threat to innocent people. I wonder how Joel Austin explained that to his church, since he's all about prosperity and no bad things happening to Christians. That's the world that we live in, and his Pollyanna prosperity gospel doesn't apply in the real world. Jesus never offered that to us, and it truly is a ridiculous thing for him to put out there.

Well, one last thing here, when we talk about protection and responsibility, it turns out that the assistant police chief of the Memphis Police Department lives nearly four hundred miles away from the city. And quite frankly, I don't blame him, because Memphis is so violent and thuggish that I wouldn't want to live there either. Police didn't talk about it. Utter failure, recognized that her failure. I'm going to live four hundred miles away. Well, I live

kind of four hundred miles away from Memphis. As a matter of fact, he lives at his house is in Atlanta, and so again, you know, Travis just made in Memphis for Atlanta. I don't know. I mean, that seems like a lateral move to exactly. Not necessarily safer that he could find some place as a giant pyramid in Atlanta or Elon musk yet,

but yeah, it was. Memphis has gotten so bad in terms of crime that when Travis and his wife recently in Texas and they were on their way back, Karen was really worried about him because there was a lot of stuff on Facebook. I don't think she told you about this, Travis, but there's a lot of stuff on Facebook. People are talking about the violence in Memphis, and they saying, don't get off the interstate, and then people live there said, no, what's happening on the interstate. We're getting drive

by shootings on the interstate. And while they were having this discussion on Facebook, there was a drive by shooting on the interstate passing through Memphis. She's going to call you and tell you don't go through Memphis, take an alternative route, but you know, stay out of the city, stay out of the even the interstate passing through. They're going next to the to the pyramid. The Bass Pro Shop is one of the coolest things built in recent memory,

and of course you can't even go see it now. Yeah, yeah, of course they didn't build that. They bought it. Somebody else built that. I don't know what they built it for. But that pyramid thing that's there, somebody got here. This is the sort of eccentric billionaire we need. I want to build a pyramid. Yeah, they got a great picture of the eclipse. Somebody set that thing up perfectly right there by that Memphis pyramid on Rumble DGA. Thank you very much for the tippy, said

David. Jim. Jordans slammed the Democrats rightfully. So when they tried to push off a two trillion dollar stimulus package in twenty twenty, a week later Trump signed it, jordan never said a word. That's right. It's Thomas Massey who really opposed that stuff. And he said, I want everybody to come back and go on record voting against this, and they were furious, you're going to kill us. All nobody died. Isn't that interesting? All

these old guys in Washington of them died not from COVID anyway. And so in response for that, you know, Trump's thanks to Thomas Massey for trying to protect the public from trillions of dollars. Trump's response was to try to primary out Thomas Massey. So he's survived attacks from Trump as well as most recently the ADF ADF, ADL, ADL, the Anti Defamation League, and a pack. I guess it was a pack, not ADL, but probably they all chipped in because they wanted money for Israel. He didn't want to

give him the money. It's very consistent with what he does. It's not anti Semitic. Isn't like robbing taxpayers to pay Peter or Paul. We're going to take a quick break and when we come back, we're going to take a look at the politics. And everybody's dying to talk about Biden. So

we got a few things there to say about Biden. What's going to be coming up perhaps today Congress comes back, We're probably going to see a lot more talk about Biden as middle competence, and we talk about that, and we'll talk about the upcoming presidential election a little bit, and then we'll get back into some things that really affect your life. We'll be right back and

defending the American dream. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, before we get into politics, I just want to say real quickly, I don't know what's happened to gold this morning? I didn't look at it, but over the weekend it was nudging right up against twenty four hundred dollars an ounce Again, it is interesting why this particular change. Well, US employment data, and again this is curated and reported by the Department of Labor,

so you can take it with a grain of salt. They always rig these things, just like they rig inflation and all these other numbers that they've got out there. But even with that, they couldn't put a real happy figure on it. So people are looking at it and saying, well, okay, that slow job growth indicates that there'll be pressure an election year to do something to ease the economic pressure or recession or whatever. I don't know that's

necessarily true. I think there will be a rate cut, but it's hard to call the timing of all this stuff. A lot of gold investors are looking at twenty four hundred dollars as the market sees fewer barriers to the Fed's easing cycle, hoping that again it's going to ease interest rates to try to stimulate the economy, to try to help the incumbent. You think they're interested

in helping the incumbent at this point in time. I don't know, But quite frankly, when you look at the Federal Reserve, I think they're more interested in protecting their hegemony in terms of the feed ont dollar. They're more interested in protecting the dollars we frequently talk about with Tony than they are about protecting the economy or protecting a politician at this point. So who knows what's going to happen with this. I mean, typically you would think that they

would do something to ease the recession, but we don't know. We don't know. I just look at gold as wealth insurance and also as insurance against the full on surveillance that they're bragging about, how they're going to use artificial intelligence, the CBDC, the digital ID, all rise of stuff that's new. We've had situations in the past where things have gotten out of control with inflation. Gold has been a good safe haven in those types of situations.

We're back into a similar looking situation at this moment. But the big issue for me is not just wealth insurance, but it's also being able to preserve privacy and financial transactions. Having whatever we can who try to get outside of this and so I just recommend again David Knight dot Gold will take you to Tony Arduban of wise Wolf Gold and you can buy gold or silver small or large amounts, and you can also set up a regular savings program with his

wolf pack that gets you a quantity discount with a big mind group. He's now got I think it was last time. I think he said what was at twelve hundred. I think that he's got. So it's growing pretty rapidly and being a being part of a buying group, you get some discounts passed to on that basis, but it's also a way that you can just gradually

save. It's also a community there. So again, whether you're looking to get just one order a small or large of gold or silver, or you want to try to gradually and systematically accumulate this, or if you want to try to set up a metals ira, Tony can help you with all that. Just go to Davidknight dot gold and let him know that you came through us. But I've known Tony a long time and I highly recommend him.

That's the few things you need to know about gold right now is who you can trust to get it because it's not really much of a question as to the shape of the dollar and what is happening economically. Let's talk about politics though. I thought this is interesting from Brian Schulhobby Health Impact News. He said, we've got a couple of big events in July. We got the

Republican National Committee is coming up in July. Of course, the Democrats aren't going to have theirs until August, and we'll talk about the effect that that could have on any kind of efforts to change horses in midstream or puppets. I guess which I don't change puppets in the middle of this show, but maybe they will, who knows. But he said in July, we're going to have the RNC convention, and then there's another event that happens every year,

and that's a conference in Sun Valley, Idaho. We have some of the wealthiest businesses come together. He says, So which one of these is going to have a bigger effect on the quote unquote elections? And we put elections in air quotes because I really don't think, especially this year, it's

getting to me. You know, it's been pretty obvious for a long time, hasn't it, Even before the twenty twenty election hasn't been obvious to you that the elections are rigged, that they're in a lot of different ways. And now after that, and then after what we've seen this year, you still want to believe that you're going to get a fair shake of the polls.

You still want to believe after what you've seen with both Trump and Biden from twenty twenty on, that it makes a difference which one of these puppets is in the Oval office. I don't think it does at all. But he talked about he said so which is going to have more in effect the Republican National Convention or the Sun Valley Conference. The Republican Convention will be mostly televised. Delegates are widely expected to choose Trump to lead the party in the

fall elections. The vice presidential choice will be allegedly revealed there. But of course what he doesn't mention, and I think it is significant for the first time for either party. The platform for the Republicans is going to be written behind closed doors, in secret, and you've even got some Republicans daring to question Donald Trump and his daughter in law over that. To me, that is one of the final straws when you don't even allow the party faithful to

go through the motions of having participation. And that's all it is. When you look at the when you look at the party platform, and they will have platform fights, and that's what they're trying to prevent, is a platform fight over something like abortion or whatever. But they have those platform fights, nobody really pays much attention to it. I think they'll draw more attention to the fact that they're doing it behind closed doors without any participation from the delegates.

The delegates who go to these conventions are people who are party activists, typically local office holders. They want to shut them down at the Republican Convention to protect Trump. And then we take a look at Sun Valley, which will also be happening in July. The most powerful moguls and tech and media gather annually at an Idaho summit where mega deals happen and where the future gets

rewritten. This is the way it's described by the tech publication called The Information and So they said this year their thoughts are dwelling on the promise and the peril of both AI and Donald Trump, artificial intelligence and an artificial president, an artificial Republican. You know, it's there's several models of artificial presidents that

you can choose from this year, He's just one of them. They descend in their private jets onto Sun Valley, Idaho for the annual confab hosted by Allen and Company, a boutique investment bank, and there'll be people there like Sam Altman and Max Levchin from a firm, and a lot of big, big people in venture capitalists. I believe the world situation politics will dominate,

said Barry Diller, who will also be there. So it's likely to be a lot of buzzing about the prospect or renewed deal making under a second Trump administration. Nobody wants to do any mergers or acquisitions right now because they're all afraid, said one person. There's no question that under a Trump administration you're going to see a lot more vibrant activity of mergers and acquisitions. So, as Brian Schall Hobby says, so here's the issue, right, what do

these people care about? Are they concerned about the First Amendment or the Second Amendment? Are they concerned about our liberty to travel to eat what we wish? No? No, they're one wondering which one can make them more money in office. As ho Menkhn said, an election is an advanced auction of

stolen goods. But it's even worse now because it's now an advanced auction of your ability to do business, of what you can get out of this gigantic financial black hole we call Washington. Now, these people like this in Sun Valley, Idaho, these are the people, the worst people in the world, coming to Washington to buy influence from these politicians, and they can get

thousands of percentage return on investment for whatever they pay for the politicians. They can leverage that and it just keeps getting more and more in terms of the amount of money given to politicians and the amount of favors that they hand out from the public treasury. This is why we see the explosion and the cost of running for office that, folks, is a direct index into the amount

of corruption with the federal government. Whether the candidates left or right, says Brian in their politics is of secondary importance as long as they can continue to make money and maintain their power base of control, which lies in the business world, not in Washington, DC. It's what they can offer people and so then that brings us to the question that everybody's talking about Biden's mental conditions and his reluctance to leave. He's been very defiant about the fact that he's

not going to leave. I think it's very interesting that there is a physician who is a Biden family physician who's been there from the beginning, the previous guy who was a physician to Trump and before him, the physician to Johnson, I mean to Obama. I think his name is Ronnie Johnson. He's now in Congress, this MD, but he was a physician to both Obama and to Trump. And he said, you know, when you look at this guy that is the physician for the Biden family, he's just like a

doctor feel good rubber stamp. You know, here's your here's your drugs, whatever. But this guy has called in a Parkinson's specialist who has visited the White House at least nine times in the past year. That's almost every month. And they're not saying saying what this this last time was in April. Uh, they're not saying what this doctor's name is Canard. Interesting name, Uh, doctor Cannard. Uh. They're not saying what this Canard was doing

there? Uh. They don't know the purpose of his visits. Why do we have a Parkinson's specialist coming nine times in the last year. However, these people looked up his his CV. His physician profile page says that he is quote a neurologist and a movement disorders specialist at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. He researches treatments for quote early phase Parkinson's disease, and so Walter Reid is the the the go to for the senior federal officials and he is

a parkinson specialist. I had my uncle I've mentioned many times, who was a forestry professor at University of and Columbia. He died with Parkinson's and he was very elderly when he died. But you know, as they mentioned this, and they mentioned the issues of Parkinson's disease and how it to affects your mental capacity, I thought back about how my uncle walked before he died, and very much like what you see with Biden' the shuffling gait and the rest

of the stuff, but also other mental issues. Alex Bearnson said Parkinson's disease might be Biden's best diagnosis. All the disturbing symptoms we see called parkinsonism. So that's simply a fact. And he's quoting from a doctor, a physician who is writing this. He said, they consist of motor slowing, of fascinating gait with reduced arm swing, a mask like facial expression, reduced vocal

volume. I saw that in my uncle. In fact, in medical school we watch videos or participants with parkinsonism like Biden to illustrate to the students how this manifests. The only question is what's causing it. The best case scenario for him would be that this is in fact Parkinson's disease. There's a lot of treatment, and the cognitive effects can be variable and sometimes not. That's significant, he says. But the worst case would be Lewis body dementia.

This can be rapidly progressive and the diagnosis is usually only made post mortem or based on rapid decline. Other possibilities include Alzheimer's disease, though that is less likely to have parkinsonism, and then finally vascular dementia, which definitely can present like this, and the courses can be variable, sometimes plateauing for long periods of time. Well, here's the thing again, when we look at his condition and the debates, and we look at Trump, Oh yeah, he

was just taking even his people. Trump's people say he was just taking advantage of by the deep state, Like really, oh okay, so he doesn't know what's going on either. Both of these guys are not in control. Is that what you're telling me here, because that's the truth, and people won't believe that. What they're trying to sell you is the idea that we need to have some young, energetic person who's in control. But they won't be in control. It'll be the guys from Sun Valley, Idaho, and

from Davos, Switzerland, and from Builderberg wherever they're having. Those will be the people who are in control, regardless of what individual they put up. It's just embarrassing for them to have somebody like Biden at this point because it shows that it's obviously, as Colonel McGregor said last week, we're being elected, we're being run by unelected people in the background. So who are these people? Well, we do know who these people are. Bureaucracy is like

the CIA and others in the military industrial complex. These are the people who've been runing this government for a long time, since I was a child. So Gavin Newsom, is he going to be the fresh face that they put out there. He was asked point blank if he would run for president after the Biden Well, Biden had his interview and it did not go well. I could show you a lot of clips of it, but it was it was again more of these gaffes and things being said. Newsom brushed aside any

suggestion that he'd be the one to take his place. In direct questions from reporter, he said, no, I mean, it's not even he started to say, and then he stopped. He said, absolutely not, said the reporter to me. He said, Newsom, it's a hypothetical that gets in the way of progress in terms of promoting this candidacy. He said, that's a legit question, but it's exactly where the other party wants us to

be having this internal fight, and I think it's extraordinarily unhelpful. I said that literally the second after to the debate, and of course Newsom was on site at the debate. He knew everybody knew. Anderson Cooper pretends that he doesn't know, and he asked, Lalla Hairs, you mean Lawa, you don't know. It's like you mean, Anderson you don't know, you mean Newsom, you didn't know. We all knew, and these are people have closer access to them than we do. And so he was there to feel

questions to be the Democrat voice scout. He says. It was my first public comments to say that we should not be talking about this, he said, So I've been consistent in this belief, not just privately but publicly. But he's always on hand with all these things. As a matter of fact, even though I love this title that was put on one of the one of the articles, they called him the hair Apparent because of his model like

hair, not hair, but hair. The hair Apparent, The hair Apparent, says no. Newsom says that he won't run an open convention if Biden drops out. So you believe that? Do you really believe that? If that's the case, then why is he traveling everywhere telling everybody how much he doesn't want the job. He was just in South Haven, Michigan telling people how he didn't want to replace Biden. And who's running California in the meanwhile?

Which pack of billionaires is running a California in his absence? Is going around essentially like brutus, You know, Biden is an honorable man. You should support this honorable man. No, he wants the job. He wants it really, really badly. It's like Marc Anthony was saying about Brutus. Rubio points out an uncomfortable fact that people have been pointing out about him. A lot of people said, well, you know, Rubio has been one of the three people that has been flagged to be the VP for Trump,

supposedly from the rumor mill, it's Rubyo, jd Vance or Bergham. I got problems with all of them. Again, I don't see anybody that I could even halfway support at the top of the ticket or the bottom of the ticket to neither party. But Rubio lives in Florida, and so does Trump, and so there's a problem with that. You're not supposed to have the president the vice president from the same state. That's prohibited. Wait, do

we care about the constitution anymore? Do we care about citizen requirements? No, we don't care about that. Do we care about the residency things, No, we don't seem to care about that. But because people have been giving Rubio a hard time about that, and of course they just wave it or ignore it. Whatever, he says, well, you know, you can't have La La, Harris and Newsom on the same ticket. There you go. And so with something like that, you know they'll just wave that

or overlook that. There's talk now from some Democrat donors and some high ranking officials of having what they call a blitz primary, blitz creed lightning war do it fast, do it warps me. It could open up the Democratic race if Biden drops out. A pair of well connected Democrats is offering an optimistic plan. They would involve the President stepping down as a nominee in the party, announcing a blitz primary process ahead of the August convention. Now I could

see that happening. I still think my hunch is still this is going to be a wag the Biden thing, as I talked about on Wednesday last week. Yeah, put out Biden is a little underdog and the sympathetic old Joe I worked and wag the dog. They had the guy who was on his way back Shoe, remember that, And so they created this campaign to you know, help old Shoe. Everybody tied their shoes together two shoelaces and threw them up over power lines and stuff like that. Bring home old Shoe.

I could just see them doing that, bring home old Joe, bring him back the sentimental favorite that they make him the underdog. And you know, if he's got one good performance, that'll harp on that somewhere. But this is what they're suggesting could possibly be done. Biden would step down as a Democrat nominee in mid July, announce the new system, and have the backing of La La Harris. Next, potential candidates would have a few days to

throw their respective hats in the ring. The Democrat Party would then begin a primary sprint in which the six candidates who received the most votes some delegates precipit pledged to run positive only campaigns in the month leading up to the convention. You know, this could work for them. It's kind of like a warp speed version of a primary. You know, forget the testing, forget the debates, forget the primary. So it's just, you know, we're rolling

out. We've got to get this out no time, right the MR and a election. The Blitz primary would involve weekly forums, with each candidate moderated by some cultural icon Michelle Obama, Oprah Taylor Swift, or some of the names that were floated in the memo in order to engage voters. You see what we're looking at here. It's like stealing Donald Trump's apprentice show. It'd be like the Apprentice, the Democrat Apprentice. It's like reality TV. Oh

that's right. All of it is reality TV, isn't it. It's all just a pageant submitted for your approval. As Rod Serling would say, we're in the twilight zone now, folks, So we really are. The nominee would ultimately be chosen by the delegates using ranked choice voting before the start of the Chicago convention August nineteenth, and it would be announced with plenty of fanfare

on the third day of the gathering. The memo imagines the nominee unveiled on stage with Biden, Barack Obama, and Bill Clinton, a reality TV show so pageant. The country would be captivated. Donations would pour in, and we can just rewrite that, just like they're going to rewrite the Constitution and everything else as soon as whoever gets in, whether it is Biden or whether it's Trump. These next four years, they're going to finish the great Reset

to try to usher into the twenty thirty. It's going to be up to us at the local level. You better pay attention to the local elections, Donnie. What's coming from either Republicans or Democrats at the national level is going to be horrific, and it's going to be an absolute refutation of all that we have seen it. We are racing this in the election. I mean, we've got, you know, all these lawfair trials against Trump and everything

else, and now this Democrat mutiny. And it's going to be that way, whether it is the Democrats in Biden or somebody else who wins, or where the Trump wins. In response to Biden, campaign spokesperson pointed to comments made by the President last week about staying in the race. He said in Wisconsin, I'm not letting one ninety minute debate wipe out three and a half years of work. I'm staying in the race and I'll beat Donald Trump. Yeah. As a matter of fact, he was real adamant about that.

Well, I guess what they're trying to push me out on the race. Let me say this as clear as I can. I'm staying in a race. I'll beat down something. I will beat him again in twenty twenty. It's going to beat him again. In twenty twenty. Ups ups don't really know, Yeah, don't really know what date it is, do we? And so the question then becomes, wait a minute. There are some state

laws about how long you have to have a candidate be in place. You can't just put somebody in at the last minute, and so there's a lot of different state laws. There was an article at the Daily Mail where they talked about the amount of time that the various states require these candidates to be identified. Let's just start with the very first one. They've got them all

in alphabetical order. Alabama. Alabama is a good example because in Alabama they require parties to submit the names of their certified candidates eighty two days prior to the general election. That means they would need to have them by August the

fifteenth. However, the Democratic Party's nominating convention isn't until the week following that deadline, so they're supposed to in Alabama, you're required by law to submit the certified candidates by August the fifteenth, but they're not even going to have the convention until August the twenty third, and so Biden is not really the certified candidate until the convention. Happens, and so they had already planned to

ignore that. The Alabama legislature unanimously passed a motion to allow the DNC to notify the state of the presidential nomination on August the twenty third. So again they're going to waive the legal requirements. I've seen this over and over again with third party stuff. For example, I've mentioned this before. When I was with the Libertarian Party, there was there was a couple of times happened where you would have a situation a heavily Democrat district, for example, and

Republicans wouldn't even run a candidate. And this happens a lot. You know, if because of jerry mandering and things like that, you have these strong jurisdictions where maybe they don't run a candidate for Congress, so they maybe don't even run a candidate for the state legislature. They just assume the other candidate the other party, is going to win it. And if somebody wants to be a sacrificial goat and run into that run in that, they can do

that, but you know, they don't really push it. And so we had situations when I was with the Libertarian Party where they would have a libertarian who would be on get on the ballot and run, and no Republican filed and the deadline passed. All right, big excitement. We got a two way race. That's good instead of a three way race. And so as soon as republic Can saw that, they got concerned and they went to court and they found a Republican candidate in several of these cases, and the judge

would always say, yeah, you're right. Democracy is not served if we don't have a Republican candidate, So we'll wave the deadline for Union get on the ballot. Now, they would never say that about a third party candidate. They would always hold us to the letter of the law. You've got to dot every eye and cross every te and you better make every deadline as

well. And you're seeing that now with RFK Junior. Right, So even after you do everything, they'll come back and they'll challenge signatures and do things like that, throw you off the ballot. They've RFK Junior got on the ballot in North Carolina. They threw him off. Now I don't know if he's gotten back on, but they'll do that type of thing. But here's you know, so you've got a lot of States, and their law is going to conflict with what the Democrats are doing. Guess what. Democrats don't

care, and they will waive all these legal requirements. And the Republicans be right there with him pushing it because it's been done for Republicans before, and they don't want to look like they're bad guys or something like that, so they they'll do that. None of those things matter. Again, we're in this so called election. It's never been more obvious that it is a selection. And so the excreman is going to hit the fan today, said many

people, as all these people in Congress are coming back to Washington. I don't think so. I think it's going to be a big pressure campaign. As I said before, if somebody pushes Biden out, and he doesn't want to be pushed out, and I think that he is just like these other people like Darth Vader Ginsburg and like Diane Frankenstein. You know, their attitude towards their Supreme Court seat or their Senate seat or whatever. It's out of my cold dead hand, over my dead body. And these people will stay

there no matter what their physical or mental condition is. They refuse to leave. And even when there's talk and whisper from people within the party, as there was with Frankenstein. Diane Frankenstein, even Pelosi was trying to nudge her out. They just stay there. And a lot of people got upset with Ginsburg because she wouldn't voluntarily step down when Obama could replace her. Instead, Trump got a chance to replace her a Republican. So you know, these

people, first of all, don't think they're ever going to die. Secondly, they are so addicted to power you can't pry it out of their hands. Now, a person like that, and Biden is definitely a person like that. One of the most authoritarian, corrupt individuals I've ever seen in my life, and I've watched politics all my life. I've never seen anybody as bad as Biden. He absolutely hates the Institution, the Bill Wrights, the

very concept of natural rights. He came after Clarence Thomas over that very issue. The Democrats want him to attack Clarence Thomas over the Anita Hill accusations. He attacked Clarence Thomas over the fact that Clarence Thomas supported the principles this country was founded on in the Declaration of Independence. And so I think a guy like that is not going to step down. I think a guy like that will do everything he can to punish people that come against him, just like

Trump does. And so I think the people I don't think it's going to be an excrement hits the fan today. I think they're going to fall in line, and there's a lot of people that are going to be beating them into line. Is not just Biden. A lot of people are going to be doing that. But there has been, as a zero Hedge points out, seven major news organizations that have staged a mocking Bird like pr coup against

Biden, for whom they spent five years running cover. When they say mockingbird, what they're talking about is the CIA Operation Mockingbird, where you had people like Walter Cronkite and others so respected and yet they were getting fed scripts from the CIA talking points and they cover these issues, say this about these issues. That's one of the reasons why when I was going up, the news

is always the same. They had three major networks, they'd all do a half hour news show and they would all cover the same issues, and they all had the same opinion. Because it was a CIA's opinion that they were repeating I used to watch it just because of like the Beethoven's Beethoven's Third Movement of the ninth Century on the Night Symphony on the NBC Newstley Brinkley Report.

Anyway, according to Just the News, the dirty seven are the New York Times, the Atlanta Journal, Constitution we used to call the Atlanta Journal Constipation, the New Yorker, the Chicago Tribune, and the Wall Street Journal, the Bustin Globe, and the Economist and Zero Hedge tweet it out and put it in their article. Is said, of course, if they really want to twist a knife, dear liberal media, we know you were suddenly desperate to get rid of old Joe. So there is this thing called Ashley Biden's

diary. You may finally want to look into that. You know this issue right here, we're in her diary. She talked about what her dad did with her. Is it interesting how we have two bonafide pedophiles running for president. It's not just that they got the usual people controlling them. But we just had a document dump of Epstein documents naming Donald Trump. One person accused Donald Trump of raping her when she was a minor. If you are pro

Trump and also very angry about what Jeffrey upstign did. Then I'm going to need you to pick one, because listen, so what gives? Donald Trump is leading in the polls and Democrats are in disarray over Biden. So why is Donald Trump in such a foul mood? Several Trump associates point to this. Judge orders surprise release of Epstein transcripts, and Donald Trump appears in Epstein

document dump. Donald Trump's name appears again and again and again and again in the new document dump that just took place of the grand jury documents relating to criminal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein as ex user malay rights. Prior to marrying Milania in January two thousand and five, Trump was calling Jeffrey Epstein in two thousand and four. On the regular we see Donald's phone messages in the West Palm

Beach indictment of Epstein released today. His messages are in between girls calling to confirm massage appointments and messages from disgrace modeling agent Jean Luke Brunell. What did they talk about? The questions are once again drawing more attention to the Trump friendship with Epstein. Donald Trump began pelling around with Jeffrey Epstein in the nineteen

eighties. Video footage and earthed by NBC News in twenty nineteen shows the two men joking around and oagling women during a party at Trump's mar A Lago in nineteen ninety two. An invitation into Donald Trump's world. Footage from nineteen ninety two found in the NBC archives shows the future president welcoming Jeffrey Epstein to his

mar A Lago estate. The get together more than a decade before Epstein pleaded guilty to prostitution charges in Florida. Both men are seen enjoying themselves, Trump pointing out women dancing in front of them. Of course you have seen that. I've shown that many times, and the pictures of Milania and that interesting expression that she has on her face as she's snuggling up to Jeffrey Epstein, as they have the foursome there of Epstein and Gallaine and Trump and Millenia.

Many people have said that it was Epstein that introduced Trump to Millenia, But the two of them were fast friends, and they hung out both in New York and in Palm Beach until they had a dispute over a piece of property they both wanted to buy. Prosecutors knew that Epstein had sex with underage girls years before the plea deal. Transcripts reveal that people called it outrageous that this

would be allowed. And again, you know the new document dump that is there, Katie Johnson is the one who says that Trump raped her at the age of thirteen. The you know again, that's our choice with these guys, and throw in RFK Junior too, right when you're looking at this kind of stuff, these are the only people that get evinced. Say it's a selection. Who do you think think is selecting the presidency? Is it Satan himself? Is it a judgment from God? That's what I think it is.

The transcripts revealed the deal between Epstein and prosecutors came two years after learning that Epstein had engaged in statutory rape of teenage girls plural, and resulted in minimal punishment for the billionaire human trafficker. Florida's Southern District Attorney, Alexicosta remember him. He became Trump's labor secretary. It's such a small little Peyton place, such a small little Charles Dickens type of novel. Isn't it where they

all know each other have these relationships. So alex A Costa was a prosecuting attorney. He served for a period of time as Trump's former Secretary of Labor. He approved a non prosecution agreement with Epstein in two thousand and eight, despite the prosecutor's knowing of the rapes. Acosta eventually left the Trum administration and scandal after details emerged outlining his botched prosecution of Epstein. And yet it's everything

about it has Trump's fingerprints all over it. When you look at who were the two defense attorneys for Epstein that got this sweetheart deal from alex Acosta, it was Alan Dershowitz and ken Starr. Ken Starr who let Clinton skate free with all the allegations of corruption, violent sexual assault, and rape against Clinton. He let him go. He came after him saying that he'd committed perjury

over a consensual affair with Monica Lewinsky. And then, of course the next thing he does is he shows up as a defense attorney for Jeffrey Epstein. And then finally, and it was kind of the capstone of ken Starr's career. Kin Starr was always put forward as this pagon of Christian virtue, and he became president of Baylor, a nominal Christian college, and he covered up

and defended the football team when it was accused of sexual assault. I don't know if it was rape as part of that or if it's just sexual assault. But that was his three strikes in your out type of thing. But then Fox News picked him up as a contributor, no problem with that. They love to find people, just like they did with Dennis Hastert. You know, they pick people that are known pedophiles, people that they can easily blackmail. And that's true of Trump, it's true of Biden. Folks.

They're the same. They're the same, and if you look at their policies, you think their policies are different. You know, when we look at what is happening and what they say they want to do with the when it comes to abortion. One of the reason they want to do this behind closed doors is because as you look at what these people are, here's a good example of it. We're about to run out of times. I'm gonna skip

forward to this. There was a woman in Germany. She was an attorney for Porsche and she has been put on trial for murder because she had an unwanted baby and she threw it over the balcony, and of course the baby died. She and her attorney considered that that was justifiable because this baby was going to be getting in a way of her career. We've heard this over and over again. How are we this is the way that democrats sell this

luxury car executive throws newborn baby from the window to her death. Feared that motherhood would ruin her career. I wonder who told her that, except the reality is is that we've got Republican politicians like JD. Vans, like Blake Masters. You know who's now pro Trump, pro Trump, pro Trump, that's all the sign says. But Jade Vance, Yeah, he's on board with the abortion pill. So is Trump. They all want to do whatever they can to just they want to throw the baby out the window, folks,

so they can get their position in politics. That's what this is about. They are no different than this woman, this attorney for Porsche. They're more than willing to throw the babies out the window so they can get what they want in their career. Although she has tried for murder, Katerina Yovanovic twenty eight and Germany was found guilty of the lesser charge of menslaughter, because hey, you know, we let people murder. You know, women can

murder their kids all the time. It's just that you really should go through this procedure that's approved with abortion and all the rest of that stuff. And again, she was an attorney. Did she not know? A horrified passerby alerted the police after discovering the baby, whose skull had been shattered from the fall on the tarmac beneath Jovanovic's window. Well, quite frankly, what she

did was far more humane than the abortionist. She didn't rip the baby apart limb by limb, which is what they do when they do an abortion. The baby died instantly on impact, far more humane. The accused is not prepared to put her life plans on hold, especially her professional advancement for a child. The prosecutor told the court that was her decision when the baby was born, and as a result, the criteria for a murder conviction is fulfilled.

In other words, this is premeditated. I'm not going to let this baby get away in my career. Her attorney, however, said it was an accident. She dropped the baby. How the child ended up over the window sill remains me to term, said the lawyer. We don't know how that happened. You know, accidents happened. Well, you know, I guess we can see that same kind of explanation from the politicians who are out there, and it really doesn't matter what they do. You can throw the

babies out the window. The only thing that matters is are you pro Trump? Pro Trump? Pro Trump? Pro Trump? Says Blake Masters. This is sent to me by Mark Listener. He said, yeah, we're witnessing a new apex in political marketing. No values, no principles, no positions, just shameless pandering. Yeah, he can throw the babies out along with any and all principles. That's exactly what these people are doing. Yew Jdvan says, I support access to the abortion pill. Mephis pristone. I guess

I call it Mephistopheles because it is Satanic. He hasn't a problem with that. He said that yesterday on Meet the Press, and so he said, the Heritage Foundation does a lot of good work, and it does a lot of things that I disagree with and a lot of things I agree with. It works with public policy. Blah blah blah. Talking about the bloodless revolution. Now, if they want to have a second American revolution, a political revolution in the ballot box, that is bloodless. How is that a bad

thing? But ripping babies apart, a bloody murder of a baby, that's that's okay, that's okay, a bloodless revolution. No, no, we don't want that. But if we rip babies apart, that's fine. That's America. That's God's judgment. That's why we have pedophiles like Donald Benedict, Donald Trump, and why we have Old Joe. These pedophiles are ruling over us. That's why the government looks the way it does. That's why they're

pushing this mutilation of kids in elementary school. Thanks for joining us. Let me sell you the David Night Show. You can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else. You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android