Mon 8Apr24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show. As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the eighth of April. You're of our lord twenty twenty four. Well, we have a lot of news. We have a lot of war news. Israel has moved the IDF out of Gaza. But of course we also have Ukraine happening. We're going to take a look at that. However, we're going to begin with news, and we're going to begin also with what is happening with automobiles. Now you

might think this is a distraction. This is not about next year's model. This is about where they or not they're going to block you from moving at all. As a matter of fact, cars have now become the home for many homeless people. Maybe that's what they'll all become if Biden gets his way. They're calling some of the people calling them massive amounts of cars parked in places of people living in them. Bidenville's Now that may be a good description

for them. They'll be right back. You'll also take a look at it. Strange article is said to me by a listener. Experiment where they hit people with electromagnetic radiation to destroy their belief in God. Well, that brings up all kinds of questions. You know, what's going on with five G, but it's also who is it that is paying these people do this kind of research. It's like, do we have an evil government or what it's

just? But again, nothing for you to be afraid of in terms of your connection with God. And I'll explain why. But let's talk about what's going on. The bridge that was knocked down and Maryland. The Maryland governor says that this aggressive timeline that he's been talking about is actually going to happen. I was surprised to see them saying that they're going to have it fully

functioned by the end of May. We'll see about that. As I said, from the very beginning on the Sunshine Skyway bridge was knocked down that connected Tampa to Saint Petersburg, and that was a commuting bridge. It was not something that was vital to a city into a state's economy. But it'll be interesting to see if we can summon the will, get past the corruption and the red tape and actually get something done in America. I'm rooting that hope

that they can. I still am skeptical. Who knows, maybe they'll just get rid of all the red tape. And like I said, it took them three years for planning and approval permits, and that was back in nineteen eighty to get started. It took them another four years to build another bridge alongside of it. So it'll be interesting to see how they're going to have a bridge built in such a short time. He says, they've already done a great deal in terms of removal of debris from the former bridge, but

that's a whole other thing to build it back that quickly. But we'll see what happens. Also, in a follow up to the bridge story, I thought it was kind of interesting that yet another ship lost power, this one in New York City. You probably saw this over the weekend close to the Arizonto Bridge, and it had tugboats around it at the time. It was not just by itself. They had three tug boats, they said, but they needed another three tugboats to get it under control because it's so much mass.

You know, a lot of inertia on these gigantic ships, container ships. But the question is losing power again, isn't that odd? You know, they tried very hard to sell them. The narrative, which I'm not really necessarily buying it, that it was bad fuel, could be bad maintenance. Maybe all these things are really sloppy, and you look at what is happening to planes. I got pieces falling off of them left and right.

Just had another plane with an engine cover flew off of it. But you know, they've just when you look at what is happening to our economy and the slipshod way that everything is running. As a matter of fact, maybe it's because they're not hiring the best people. You know. Rob Schneider has got a routine about that, the EI CEO of United Airlines. Last month, the CEO he announced of all the hiring for all the new pilots that are coming up this year, all the hiring for the new pilots, the

main focus is going to be diversity. What diversity? Not the best pilots you can find, the most hours of experience, No diversity. I don't know about you, but I'm sick and tired of flying all the time with

these white pilots landing safely and on time. Boring. It does make more interesting news all these other things that are happening the planes are falling apart in mid air, and ships one after the other losing power and crashing into bridges, and we really have a society, and Gates spending unbelievable amounts of money to propagandized kids and say, don't worry about math. There's no right answer to anything, not even to math. Let's remove all objective truth and the

idea that it even exists. You'll do what Gates want you to do, right, And that's what he wants. He doesn't want critical thinking people I've seen this's the longest time. They don't want educated, but they want to deliberately dumb you down. From Charlotte Deserby to George Carlin had listeners send me George Carlin's thing that you know it's a club and you ain't in it, a long clip of that, and he's absolutely right. It's just the type

of thing. They don't want to educate people. They want you uneducated. They don't want you to believe that anybody's got the right answer to anything where there's building a bridge or maintaining a plane or anything else. But again, it comes back to this loss of power. As I said, it's kind of convenient for them to hang out on the fuel thing. But how does that work? In New York City they do the same thing. They sell people junk fuel. Why didn't it happen to other ships there with this thing?

But as I said, that just doesn't seem right. If it was maintenance, well somebody be in a lot of trouble. If it was cyber attacks, then people would start to freak out about that. And I have no idea what's going on inside the ships. I have no idea how connected they are. No, things are being more and more connected all the time. It's not beyond reason that there is some vulnerable part of the system that they could attack which would cause other things to shut off. We're seeing this

everywhere. We've seen this. A goat Tree talked about it every year. Many years ago, we were talking about this, how they were hacking cars, how they were hacking medical devices, and how a guy who was going to demonstrate how to hack these medical devices died suddenly from an overdose there in Vegas just before the convention where he's going to expose it. And goat treesaid,

I know him. He doesn't use He says, he's no more likely to use drugs than you are talking to me, and because they you know. Anyway, when we look at all of this stuff again, I don't understand how these ships are connected. But does seem suspicious to me? And when we talk about the fragility of our infrastructure, I thought this is fascinating. It's from textpot dot com. Two mines in North Carolina are the world's

only producer of the quartz that is necessary for semiconductor manufacturing. Well, why aren't we using that like the Chinese are using there rare earth advantage and lithium advantage and anything. Of course, their biggest advantage is the one that we gave them in terms of CO two. They can emit all the CO two and methane. They want no restrictions on that whatsoever. India as well, the two largest populations because of the Parish Climate treaty. But we have to

reduce and cap ours. And we now got the EPA on our power stations, just like they've been on our cars. Try to destroy them and shut them down, make everything more expensive, break everything. But we have two mines in North Carolina. The entire semiconductor industry is dependent on it. They need It's a court you can get a lot of different places, but this is a particular pure type of courts that they need as they start to get

more and more advanced semiconductors. As you get more and more advanced semiconductors, I remember, you know, they were trying to get too. I don't even decidly remember. I don't remember what the dimensions were, but it was orders of magnitude bigger the dimension the geometries that they were working with when I was doing it forty years ago, forty four now than it is today. And so they just keep getting things smaller and smaller, which means that you

have to have more and more refinement, less tolerance for air. We start getting down into what is essentially nanotechnology almost now you have to they're very susceptible to any kind of impurity. Ultra high purity courts central component for sem country chips. The only places in the world that can meet the need are two mines in small North Carolina town. And so the owner of the mines company you've probably never heard of, Sabellco, is investing seven hundred million dollars to

expand capacity. But is that going to be enough to keep up with the expanding demand, especially because of artificial intelligence. Because I guess that's it. I guess that's where the state of the art is now, where they have to have the purest courts. It's in a town called Spruce Pine, which I've never heard of, about two hour drive northwest of Charlotte. It's probably

not too far from here, very tiny town, two mines. And what's fascinating about this is when you stop and think about these obscure little things like this, what does it take to bust our infrastructure? Not much. There's so many things like this that we don't know anything about. As I've said before, the first time I talked to Jack Lawson about a civil defense manual that you put together twin volume. You can find it at Civil Defensemanual dot

com. But the first time we talked about it, that's what he talked about. He said, look at how fragile our infrastructure is. Not only do we have these weird things like this, but we also have a lot of times some critical component that's not even in our country, it's somewhere else. Usually that is the case. Just take a look at we have the the purity of courts that is unique here in our country, and yet most

of the advanced semiconductors are being made in Taiwan. So what happens if there's some kind of a conflict between Taiwan and China, Well that all comes to an end. And so, but he was talking about just in terms of the different transportation links between everything with a just in time delivery of inventory or distributed infrastructure. So it's again if you want to know what you can do to prepare yourself to get outside of that incredibly complicated, layered and fragile infrastructure

system that we have. Now, yes, it's delivered amazing things to us, and we're starting to see it get very shaky, aren't we, in a lot of different ways. And there are vulnerabilities that we never knew about, and so you need to start taking a look at how you can prepare to survive outside of that infrastructure, which could easily go down or be taken down by enemies foreign or domestic. Very easy for that to go down. On rock Fan Handy says, my work partner's mom was just diagnosed with lymphoma.

I'm sorry. She had been telling him she didn't take any shots. Turns out she took three and didn't tell him wow, Wow, I'm sorry to hear that on rock Fan. I thank you, James. I appreciate the tip well. As they point out, it's integral not only to the global semiconductor industry, but also to the solar photovoltaic market. The solar panels got to have that quartz. I hope they've got a lot of it.

It does boggle the mind a bit to consider that inside nearly every cell phone and computer chip you will find quartz from Spruce Pine town you've never heard of

before, right here in North Carolina. Probably not too far from us if they're two hours northwest as Charlotte, because that was what about four or five hours from Raleigh to here, and you know, so anyway, and then we take a look at how they're constantly spying on everything and on you Wall Street Journal as a story about insurers looking at yet another reason to go up

on your rates or to cancel you all together. And so in this particular case, what they're doing is going around and doing aerial inspections of homes, getting a drone and taking aerial pictures of let's say, your roof, Well, I'm sorry, your roof has got problems with it, And they gave the example of one woman who the insurance company flew a drone over house, took pictures of the roof, said your roof is is crummy. We're going

to cancel your insurance. And she called out a roofer independent contractor. He said, no, you got another was it five or ten years on it? Fine shape? They wouldn't listen to it. They canceled it anyway. They're just looking for an excuse. Also going around looking do you have like a trampoline on your property that you didn't tell us about, because now there's

additional liability for us. But what this reminds me of more than anything I've seen this game before in Tampa, and I've talked about on the show as well, Sandy Freeman, who they called Sandlot Freeman because she was trying to get rid of homes. She would go into the very low income homes and a lot of these were old houses that had been built forty fifty years earlier, lived in by poor people, but they were for the most part paid

off that had them for a very long time. Elderly people and they didn't have the income to do a lot of home maintenance, and so they would send building inspectors around. They were not flying overhead. They have drones. They just send the building inscors around. At your lawn needs to be mode, and so we're going to start hitting you with fifty dollars day finds for that. You got to paint your home. That's going to be seventy five

dollars a day for that. This really happened, and this happened back in the nineteen eighties, and the purpose of it was to accumulate enough fees that the city could come in and just steal the home from these people. And then Sandlot Friedman, the mayor, would condemn, would knock the houses down.

Wouldn't we sell them? Just knock them down, and then do that to another one, another, one, another one, and they got enough of them down, then they would use the imminent domain on the few remaining and then turn that Sandlot over to her friends who are real estate developers. Because of the local level, most of the corruption is with real estate stuff and zoning stuff. When you get the state level, that's when they switch over to lawyers and they start, you know, doing things like that.

But at the local level, a lot of it was about real estate and so she was doing these condemnations and in order to help her friends and you know, build out skyscrapers and that type of thing. In Tampa in the early eighties, my sister was contacted by some people that my dad had had a mortgage. He would go in and he'd buy homes and fix them up and and and do it himself. And then he there were some of these

that were still mortgages that were paid being paid. And these people ran into this type of thing and contacted my sister who was managing it at the time, and she went down to Tampa to see what was going on. And in the in the courtroom they had the one she's watching the cases come up. There had a little old lady who somebody had dropped a railroad tie in the back of her house. It was an alley that ran down the back of the house and they dropped this railroad tie there. She called the city

of Tampa and said, can you move this for me? Somebody just abandoned dropped this on my property. Well, they sent a guy out and he gave her a ticket and said you have to remove it, and until you do, we're going to start accumulating this fine. And so the judge playing hardball with her, because that's what this court was set up to do, to steal people's property, you know, it's like a tax court or something like that. And so he says, no, did you know was that

on your property or not? She says, well, it was, it was on my property. And guy stands up. Who was there to advocate for these people? He said, don't answer that question. Don't see anything else to him. I mean, it was amazing, amazing what they were doing to people. I think that's what this insurance scam is about. Frankly, I think you got you know, the big businesses and the big companies, they're moving at the point where they want to take homes from people.

They're using any kind of excuse to make them more expensive to confiscate them. And I think that is part of this. Certainly, they're always looking for ways to rip people on, but they may it may be that aspect of it, It may go that far. That is an organized process to do that. While we're talking about destroying the middle class, we all knew that the massive army of IRS agents that Biden was putting out there, well,

that was its purpose, right. We said that from the very beginning, is that anytime you look at, well, what are we going to have to do to pay for the government, Well, there's absolutely no way that you can pay for the government when it's adding another trillion dollars every hundred days. There's no way that they could ever attack us to do that. We are so far beyond anything that could ever be fiscally responsible or even paid off.

As I've said many times, if they're going to go with their magic money tree theory, they call it MMT Modern monetary theory, which says that deficits don't matter. Well, if the deficits don't matter, and you're going into debt more than a trillion dollars every one hundred days, and when does it matter to have an income tax? Right, Well, because that's targeting us, that's making sure that we stay poor or that we get poorer.

That's to make sure that they've sawn off the rungs on the ladder so that we can't climb onto it, because they're already up there. That's why you have the income tax, that and so that you can weaponize it against your political enemies. But of course they have so many other weapons for their political enemies today, don't they This is really about breaking the middle class. And now documents have come out from the IRS it show, in fact that the

new IRIS agents that they have hired are in fact doing exactly that. That they're targeting the middle class for audits because the middle class doesn't have the money or the ability to really defend themselves and these audits. And when the law is sufficiently complex as the IRS code is, it's the same as having no law at all. And depending on who is your auditor, what they think about you, you know, and who has stuck them on you makes all

the difference in the world. Back in August of twenty twenty two, says Loswolf, when some of us were fresh faced and naive, the Internal Revenue Service assured us that they're eighty billion dollar infusion of cash so they could hire eighty seven thousand new workers, including but not limited to men with guns. Would actually be a means of targeting millionaires and billionaire scoff laws, but not

ordinary middle class wage earners. She says. At the time, I voiced skepticism correspondence and audits and other audits of low and middle income earners are simply the easiest to conduct. I mean, if we go and look at civil asset forfeiture, right, you look at the big cities where they have come after people. They would steal from the poorest people. They'd like to go in and get cars that were valued about a thousand, because they would charge

you nine hundred dollars to contest that. That's one of the reasons they say it's a civil forfeiture. Well, we're not saying that you did any crime. We're just saying that the car did a crime. I'm not charging you with anything. I'm not going to get a conviction against you, but that car did something, had something in its possession. It's kind of bizarre anthropomorphism projecting human qualities onto inanimate objects. They always charged a stack of cash or

a leer jet or a car or something or home. But they were going after targeting. After they started that, well always going to be to shut down organized crime, of course, but it very quickly went to coming after people who are pro life protesters, and then it went after the poor people again. Cities like Chicago and other places like that where they said, well, if you want to contest this, you've got to put up nine hundred dollars, so you can argue your property is innocent. And so they would

steal cars that were about nine hundred dollars. So even if the people wanted to push back against it, it was not anything that made any sense for them. Well, the IRiSS got an audit of its own, and two irregularities jumped out, report of the Wall Street Journal. President Biden's plan to hire a new army of tax collectors is falling flat, and the agents already

at work are targeting the middle class, says the Wall Street Journal. As of last summer, sixty three percent of new audits targeted taxpayers with income of less than two hundred thousand dollars, sixty three percent targeting people of less than two hundred thousand dollars. Maybe they're going to go after the billionaires. Only a small overall share reached the very highest earners, while eighty percent of audits

covered filers earning less than a million. These resources are absolutely not about increasing audit scrutiny on small businesses or middle income Americans, they said, We've been planning our investment of these enforcement resources. It's designed around the Department Treasuries directive that audit rates will not rise relative to recent years for households making under four hundred thousand dollars. He wrote, well, oh, that was a lie,

and we now see it. Janet Yellen, former Fed Federal Reserve Chairman and Treasury Secretary, now said, we'll contrary to misinformation from opponents to this legislation, small business or households earning four hundred thousand dollars per year or less

will not see an increase in the chances that they are audited. And yet now that we audit the auditors, who watches the waters, who audits the auditors, well, we audit them, we find out that guess what they're lying, sixty three percent of audits targeted taxpayers of income less than two hundred thousand dollars, and that would include businesses as well. Now here's what the IRS is about out and they don't even get to it in this article.

This increase in the IRS. I've said from the very beginning, yes, it is going to not be directed at the richest people. But that was the whole bluff about the income tax in the first place. It was only going to be a one percent tax on the one percent, the up one percent, and then very quickly it metastasized into not being a tax on income, which was defined at that time as investment income, money that you would make on the stock market and that type of thing. Then it changed to

wages during World War Two. It had never been a tax on wages before, and then they kept it statutorily. It was limited. But after World War two ended, you would get in your when they'd mail out the forums every time I thank you for participating in our voluntary tax system. Well, if you don't participate, you find out real quickly just how voluntary it is. It's all a very cynical lie from the very beginning. But this lie was really about taking everything from us as part of the Great Reset, as

part of CBDC. Because around the same time that was Biden releases the stuff about well, let's everybody report back to me, all of you, all the deep state, which is underneath the presidency, all of the deep state, the deep state is the bureaucracy, is all under the executive branch. Trump was the king of the swamp. He did nothing to clean any of it or drain any of it. It got swampier while he was there, as a matter of fact. But he told all the swamp to report back

to him in four different areas. One of those areas was enforcement, and that's what he was talking to the Department of Justice and the IRS about how they were going to enforce CBDC. We've yet to see the full impact of these eighty seven thousand new IRS agents and their new budget for artificial intelligence and computers to analyze everything that we do. It must be a real dream for these people, because that was the purpose of the IRIS from the very beginning.

Really, when I was when I first started paying taxes, when I was working in college. Uh, talking to my dad about it, It's like, yeah, so what's the point of this. Why this is like signed confession. So yep, yep, that's what it is, you know, the attesting that all the facts that this is all correct, and they can come after you if they have a different interpretation of this, of course, and so it is always it was an intelligence gathering thing. It was

an incrimination thing. Of course. Now they got social media and a lot of other things like that that we incriminate ourselves with. In Switzerland, you have farmers dumping sheep that have been killed by the wolves in front of a Swiss government building. Well, I think that is a very fitting metaphor, isn't it. Yeah, the government is wolves, hang on the sheep, and the sheep have now dumped the dead sheep that have been killed by the

government wolf in front of the building. I've said for the longest time we talk about the federal government, we just need to drop that exetra e and the d and we have feral government, a government that used to be tame under our control, like George Washington said, like fire. Government is like fire. It is a fearful servant, got to be very careful with it, and a dreadful master if he gets out of control. And our federal

government has gone feral. Here in Switzerland they have the wolf metaphor. Of course, our government here in the United States has released a lot of wolves into areas where they had been eradicated. They are pests. Around a dozen breeders came from one area in the western Swiss canton to lay out the carcasses of twelve sheep in front of the regional government headquarters in Lussan. These sheep were killed last night, said the member of the association, demanding that the

government do something about it. It's really time to act. The problem is that they don't realize that's what the government wanted them to do. We're sick of this, we're sick of the wolf kill. Cohabitation is not possible, our territory is too small. And then, of course the reality is the government probably agree with them and say you're the ones who have to go. We're going to turn it over to the wolves and the predators we identify with

them. After being wiped out more than a century ago, wolves have in recent decades begun returning to Switzerland into several other European countries, introduced by their respective governments. And same thing with tyrants a couple hundred years ago. Seems like we got rid of the tyrants, and now the tyrants are back,

and now they're unleashing wolves on us of one form or the other. It can come in the form of surveillance cameras, uniformed officers, irs, agents who don't wear uniform It can come in so many different forms, can't it. But it's still wolves among the sheep. And then we have the wolves among the sheep, and the political parties and the politicians and so forth, deceiving people. Nature conservation groups have hailed the return as a sign of a

healthier and more diverse ecosystem. Oh, there you go. It's about diversity. It's good then, right, always the useful idiots, the eco groups right there at the center of it. So are your eyes open? Says expos A News. Global governments are in a silent war against humanity and we're in a prelude to World War III and a march towards a digital dystopia. I think a better way to put it as slavery enslavement. They seek to poverish us so they can enslave us, and that is really what is happening.

They have an introduction here where they say, well, our own intelligence agencies used to be James Bond, but now they've become blowfelt. They were never James Bond. That was a lie that was sold to the FBI was never this straight up organization like Jaggar Hoover was telling people doing programs to show people how righteous they were. He had some good people in the FBI who were focused on law enforcement, but that wasn't the mission of Jaggar Hoover,

you understand. You know, he had his own little game that was running in the background there. It's a power play in Washington blackmailing. Everybody had multiple presidents saying that, And how long does it take before they stopped coming after their political opponents in Washington start coming after the individual sheep throughout the country. Well, that time has already come, and we see what the FBI has turned into with that. Our educational system alphabet grooming, robbing its victims

of the very freedom of thought and expression. That is again what it was designed to do. You have to understand that our education system was designed as an indoctrination system. It was designed as an indoctrination system. Say well, we're going to make our society better, We're going to indoctrinate them with our good Christian values. Then what happened. The institution's got taken over by the Marxists as always as people like Antonio Grammercy that said well, we're going to

we're going to take over these institutions. We're not going to have a revolution where we overthrow the government like they did in Russia, China, that type of thing. No, we're going to do it from the inside. We're going to have a long march like Mao did. But it's not going to be a military thing. It's going to be a long march through the institutions and a bureaucratic thing. It's a very calculated, designed thing. And this

long march has been going on my entire life. We now see the product of this World War three is not yet begun, but our governments are already at war with the entire human race around the world. It's not just the American government. The American governments perhaps the worst of all of them, but they're all at war with their own people. That is a scale of the assault that we're facing. Indeed, they go so far as to engineer World War three if they can. I mean, what control freak does not want

martial law? Well, that's a rhetorical question. We already know the control freaks Trump and the control freak Biden loved it, didn't I, And so I thought this was good From the article. History has taught us that the public in the West has to be programmed to accept concentration camps and stages or you know, the open air prisons of the fifteen minute cities. Number one.

It starts with an artificial classification. You know, for example, vaxed versus unvaxed our high credit score versus low social credit score, something like that high carbon or low carbon lifestyle. Then one demonizes particular or classes of people. The unvaxed people are bad. The good people are the ones who are vaxed that type of thing. Then one discriminates against the demonized groups. Things become more and more difficult if you don't have that digital idea or that vaccine

or whatever. Then you start removing rights from the demonized groups. Then one blames a demonized group for a manufactured atrocity which has nothing to do with the group. Next step the media and cites national hatred against the demonized groups. Then the government makes digital IDs mandatory as a result of some other manufactured atrocity, because there's always been where the mcguffin is headed, the number of the

beast, the number of the government. Then those of that digital ideas can be sent to prison, and much of the population will go along with it, as we've already seen are in twenty twenty. Remember some of these people that are still champions to conservatives, you know, Oh well, it's getting like Scott Adams. It's getting harder and harder to tell these freedom lovers from sociopaths. Do what you need to do to take these people out. That's

what he said. Two weeks and then the two weeks to flatten the curve. Yeah, so those are that digital d can be sent to prison. Much of the population will go along with it, believing that these unregistered people are enemies of the state, potential terrorists, and a danger to the war effort. Or you know, maybe even as conservatives in Florida are setting up,

maybe they're a threat to your employment. Maybe you've got these illegal aliens who come in and we need everybody needs to have an ID mandatory everify. It's been there for a long time, the EVERIFY has but to make it mandatory, which they just did in Florida. Make it mandatory so that you've got to get approval from the federal government. Have a job. You know that they're going to make an exception for the squatters, don't you with that? Or uh, you have to. This is the other one that's coming

from the conservatives who ought to know better. Right, we're worried about these illegal aliens coming in here and voting, you know, so we need to have more and more. You know, we got to have IDs for this id's for that, and all I do think that you ought to have IDs for voting. I've talked about that for a long time. But you understand, it's going to be the fear of these people, and it comes to both the left and the right. The left just wants to control everything.

The right's got certain things that they want to control. But they're getting there. They're getting to the same position that the left has been for a long time. Big Daddy government is your friend. We just got to make sure that it's our big daddy who's there, and not that bad big daddy from the other colored people, you know, the Blues. We want the red big daddy or the orange big daddy. We don't want the blue big Daddy.

That's the power that they have. And we know how this all turns out, too, don't we. This is a good post from an X from Andrew Kotte, and he said he's talking about the Chinese Cultural Revolution and how they came after people. It was always good to remind ourselves of this because this is what we are living through right now. You know, just as she Van Fleet said Mao's America a Survivor's warning, she understands that's exactly

what this is, and we better understand what it is too. It's not woke, it's marks and these people are completely asleep who are falling for this? And the Guangxi Cultural Revolution, official records show between one thousand and one hundred and fifty thousand people were killed by methods like being buried alive, drowning, boiling alive, and disemboweling. Local offices of the Communist Party sponsored cannibalism.

Public records show at least one hundred and thirty seven people were eaten by Communist Party members, though some scholars claim there are at least four hundred and twenty one named people who were eaten. And let's put this in context too. You know, part of the what happened with the with Mao's Cultural Revolution and sending people out away from the cities to grow stuff. Part of what

happened with it was massive starvations. While you heard in the nineteen fifties, well you each your finisher expendature, whatever it is that you don't like on your plate, because the kids in China are starving. What our parents didn tell us was the kids in China are starving because of their communist government. But anyway, the scene from that I showed you a couple of weeks ago seen from the Three Body Problem. That film Reenacting a struggle session could have

been based off a story of Wu Fu Sheng. In nineteen sixty eight, a geography instructor named Wu Shu Feng was beaten to death by students at the Woksan Middle School. Her body was carried to the flat stones of the river, where another teacher was forced at gunpoint to rip out her heart and liver. Back in the school, the pupils barbecued and consumed the organs because again Mao had turned them into the Donner Party. Independent researchers in Guangxi counted a

total of four hundred and twenty one people who were eaten. There are other reports of cannibalism across twenty seven counties in Guangxi. That's two thirds of all the counties in Guangxi. There was one man who was said to have been the so called fifth category, who was beaten to death where he stood. He had two kids, one to eleven. The other fourteen. Local officials and our militia said it was important to eradicate such people, so they not

only killed those two children, they ate them too. This took place in Hubai County, Guangxi, where thirty five people were killed and eaten in total. Most of them were rich landowners and their families. I guess this is where the Marxist revolutionaries in the nineteen sixties said, eat the rich. They had some inside knowledge about what was going on and had happened in China.

I guess there was one landowner whose entire family was wiped out. He had seventeen year old daughter who was gang raped by nine people and then ripped open her belly and ate her liver and other organs. Frank Decater, professor and chairman of Humanities at the University of Hong Kong, says, it's not enough to eliminate your class enemy, you have to eat his heart. So there are very well documented cases of ritual cannibalism. There was a hierarchy in the

consumption of class enemies. Leaders feasted on the heart and liver mixed with pork, while ordinary villagers were allowed to only peck at the victim's arms and thighs. The Cultural Revolution and total kill between one and two million people lasted for ten years. Nowick killed way more than one to two million people. It's more like eighty to one hundred million. It was initiated by Mao to purge the country of political dissonance. But it was also to come after people who

were educated. If you're educated, some cases it was just somebody who wore glasses. If you well, you probably wear glasses because you read a lot, or you have to have them because you want to read. That could be your death sentence there. And when we go back and we look at the kinds of these horrendous atrocities in history, what are you talking about, Mao. Were you talking about Stalin's purges? Go to the French Revolution.

Look at all these different communist revolutions and how vicious it always became. It doesn't have to be communism. It can be any kind of authoritarianism. Look at Hitler, right, Look at Nazi Germany. So after after this happened and people went back and looked at it, they did hand out some penalty to some of these officials. Some of the participants were prosecuted. Some of them got up to fourteen years in prison. Now that's less than they give

to the January of the six people. While ninety one members of the Chinese Communist Party were expelled from the party. That is very serious for them because now they are outside of the law, their outlaws, essentially on their own in a situation where you don't really have anything except to try to scrounge in the black market. Thirty nine non party officials were demoted or had their salary cut. There you go, that's what this person said, and this is

what communism is. Millions of people died to purge political dissidents. They boil people alive, had cannibalism, and the punishment a salary cut, a salary cut. Well, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back, and we're going to talk about where the Western governments are in terms of information, whether you were talking about Pennsylvania or Europe or Germany. They're all saying, well, don't don't think for yourself, don't do your

own research, do and say what we say. Elvis, gentlemen, the Beetle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show. That's right. No matter what happens, they can't take that away from us. Can they disinfo Guru in Pennsylvania. This is the Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth as well as an executive director of something called the Pit Disinformation Lab. That's straight

from the Pit of Hell. But it's got to t's the Disinformation Lab. Now, what they don't tell you is that they're the source of the disinformation. They're not studying it, they are creating it. They're promulgating it. So Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth and then Disinformation Lab executive director were in a forum last Tuesday and they were asked how to combat so called misinformation and disinformation?

How do we combat that? How did we always do that? Well, we used to do it with debate, but we don't even have debates for the presidential candidates anymore. Nobody wants to talk about issues when they have debates, so yeah, why bother to have them. They're all just well, you did this, and you did that, and it's all this ad hominem stuff, And quite frankly, I'm convinced they convinced me all these I'm convinced that both of them are bad guys. And that's not just the president,

that's these other people who are running for Senate or whatever governor. You know, they got more than enough ammunition to throw at the other guy. And they're right about that. But they don't want to talk about the issues. And if they talk about the issues, it's going to be two or three wedge issues that they've had around for decades. They want, even if they've lost one of them, like abortion, they want to bring it back. So he says, when you see misinformation, this is what one of

the two said. This is Schwunky, who is the Disinformation Lab executive director. So here's the guy who is putting the disinformation out there. He says, when you see misinformation, it's best not to engage with it online because you're helping to amplify it. No, just the opposite. You engage it and you fight against it. You debate it, use critical thinking, you cast down their strongholds and their arguments. You hold up truth. That's what

you're supposed to do. That was always the ethic of Christian societies, but not anymore. That's one of the reasons why you need to have free speech. One thing everyone can do to make sure they're seeing accurate information is to use trusted sources like me and say like me. That's what I said. So in elections, that means using the Department of State. So he was saying like me, he just didn't put it. He just didn't say it

as concisely. That means using your county elections office. That means using media organizations that adhere to your professional journalism standards, you know, like your local MPR affiliate. He said that with a great face. I'm sure the MPR affiliate the standard, the gold standard of truth. And it doesn't mean you know, doing your own research, he said, yeah, don't do your

own research, just asking questions and sharing posts from I don't know. In my case, Uncle Joe, right, it means being thoughtful about where your sources are coming from. Well, yeah, you should should consider your sources, but you should also consider what they're saying. You know, even MPR can say something true once in a while by mistake, I guess. But they like a broken clock, except they're not right twice a day there,

maybe twice a decade or something. The Department of State Election Task Force will partner with SISSA. These are the people who are supposed to protect us from cybersecurity attacks, right, Instead, it's become it's going to be a propaganda organization, that's what it really has become. Well, they'll partner with SISSA, the nerve center of the government's censorship branch, to provide voters with accurate, trusted election information and to mitigate threats to elections, such as any speech

that they determined to be misinformation. Anything that disagrees with them is a threat and must be shut down. Well, as all this is happening in Pennsylvania, in Germany, the chief of intelligence there is doing the same thing. Isn't this interesting? I mean, it's just like we saw with the lockdowns and everything else. It's like it is with the pandemic mcguffin, It's like it is with it's the climate. Mcguffin. They've all got the same end

goal, and they're all marching in lockstep doing the same things. At the same time, the German Interior Ministry continues to defend its controversial and widely criticize plans to restrict the speech, the travel, and the economic activity of political dissonance. Rites Eugippius on substag the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution. That's what they call this. They always like to call it it's like calling the Patriot Act patriotic. Okay, this is the Office for the Protection

of the Constitution. Every country on Earth, including communist China, has a great constitution that says all kinds of wonderful things about our rights as human beings. But they don't mean it, and they don't enforce it, and they don't obey it themselves. Our domestic intelligence service and our political police have sacrific fist substantial popular regard in the face of this campaign, he said. According to published last month, the plurality of Germans believe that this BfV the that's

their German version of it. But it's the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution. Most Germans believe that it's being used for political purposes, and that is every single party except for the Greens. They have been the most autalitarian of anyone everywhere. I mean it was the Greens in Switzerland said no, we like the wolves killing the sheep. There's always the Greens, and

I've said they're watermelon greens. They've got a thin veneer of green environmentalism on the outside, but inside they're all red, not conservative Republican MAGA supporters, not red as a communist read. If you look at these people who start talking who paired all this stuff about red states and even refer to themselves as red state this and red state that. We got a lot of different media

people out there call themselves red state. I look at that and it's like, if this person is that shallow, that devoid of any historical context, I'm not interested in what they have to say, quite frankly, especially if they're doing news analysis. If you're doing news analysis and you don't understand that red has always been the color of anarchy and that this is a game to get you to identify it, and you're a sucker that's going to identify with

that, I'm not interested in what in your analysis whatsoever. Red State this. And it's just amazing. The thing about freedom expression, he said, the guy who runs it, Thomas holden Wang, he says the thing, and he wrote an op ed piece and one of the German papers, Frankfurter Algamine. So yeah, it's just this guy's hot dogging it and the local paper, Frankfurter. So he says, the thing about freedom of expression is that it is not carte blanc for enemies of the constitution. Oh, yes,

it is, yes, it is. I mean even somebody like this guy who is an enemy of the constitution gets to speak freely. But everybody is supposed to have that right, he says. There's talk about opinion police and language police, even government security service. They say that the BfV discredits political opinions on command as extremists as soon as they depart from the social and political mainstream, or when they embark upon criticism of the government action or the

work of the democratic parties. But he says, and so he states the truth there, that's exactly what we're doing right as to confess it. And then he follows it up with this one thing should be unmistakably clear. Freedom of opinion prevails in Germany, and that is a good thing. Freedom of opinion is a fundamental element. However, what distinguishes a democracy from an autocracy or dictatorship is that, you know, we have to shut this stuff down.

Look, this is like the people. I love the Second Amendment, but turn in your gun. Oh I don't want to see any abortions happen, but let's make it possible to kill your kid at any stage in life. Right, this is They always preface this stuff. There's always a big butt that gets inserted into all of this. We know exactly what these people

are doing, and we know that there are organizations that have been pushing this behind the scenes into your organizations and billionaires like Bill Gates. He had his ID twenty twenty. He wanted everybody to have ID in twenty twenty. Well, that was when they kicked this stuff off right. That was he was a right on schedule, really started creating the demand, the need, the excuse to make everybody get an ID. He has his Immunization Agenda A twenty

thirty. He wants everybody, every age, everywhere. That's a slogan and what he means by that when he says everyone everywhere, every age vaccinated with everything they can think of everything they can make an excuse for the digital public infrastructure that they're creating. The Gates is funded is really part of the Technocracy plan, and Technocracy News has has done a good job. There is a Technocracy study course from nineteen thirty four, because it was in the early nineteen

thirties that this really took off. That was the time at which HG. Wells did the shape of things to come. Then they turned it into movie Things to Come and Raymond Massey in it and some other famousctors, and it was about a constant state of war between humans. And so this group of people who were technocrats, they understood how things worked and they were going to use their superior knowledge of technocracy of technology rather to impose a rule by them.

They were the airmen and they were going to come in and you impose a piece on everybody, like a Pax Romania or something, but it's going to be packs technocracy. And that was the book in the movie were about.

There was also a technocracy study course in nineteen thirty five. You also had the maternal grandfather of Elon Musk, Joshua Haldeane, who tried to overthrow the government of Canada and install a technocracy in the nineteen thirties and then when he beat the rap he beat it out of Canada and went to South Africa. So this is something that was all the rage in the nineteen thirties, along with eugenics as well. There's a lot of very nasty elitist stuff that

was happening there. We're better than you, will kill you, we're better than you, we will enslave you. That type of thing that's you know, eugenics is about killing you. The technocracy is about enslaving you. These elitists, you're superiors, superior because of their knowledge of technocracy. But Technocracy News has from time to time shown you can probably look through their archives and find the Technocracy study course in nineteen thirty four. They quote it from time

to time. So there was seven requirements for technocracy. He goes and here here's three of them that relate to the Global ID. You have to provide a continuous inventory of all production and consumption. Everything's going to have a number of tag. Provide a specific registration of the type, the kind, et cetera, of all goods and services we're produced, if we're used, Provide specific registration of the consumption of each individual, plus a record and a description

of the individual. And so there was a Technocrat magazine that operated in the nineteen thirties to push that idea, there were study courses about it, you had people who tried to impose it, and then you could fast forward another forty years in the nineteen seventies you have the big new Virzinski who kicked off the Trilateral Commission was the person they put in charge of the Carter White House, that people who really run the government put him in charge. It's like

people really run the government put Kissinger in charge. During the Nixon administration, he had talked about the technocratic age this book between two ages where they would be able to anticipate everything that you're going to do because they're tracking everything that

you do. And Technocrat magazine, Technocracy nineteen thirty seven this quote. Technocracy is a science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population for the first time in human history. It'll be done as a scientific, technical, and engineering problem. Technocracy will distribute by means of a certificate, a distribution available to

every citizen from birth to death. And so as a result of that, that's where you get the things like the desire, the love of universal basic income, people like Bloomberg. Then you know, we've had these that we've gone from in a grand society to an industrial society. And now those of us who are smart figuring out how to take everybody's jobs because we don't need them. What we have to do is figure out how to keep them from

coming after us with guillotines. This is what he said when he was running for president in twenty twenty. Michael Bloomberg and everybody, everybody, even the places that published his entire quote, focus on the fact, look at the heat. Just insulted farmers. Remember that, everybody, Michael Bloomberg, this city boy just insulted farmers. And they got a complicated task to do, and they've got to figure out how to make ends meet and how to pull

all this stuff together on their own. And that's all true, but they completely missed what he was saying, the fact that we've got to figure out how to pacify people so they don't come after us with guillotines. That's what universal basic income is about. And he was saying that Andrew Yang was running and that was his key thing, and Elon Musk gave him millions of dollars because that's a key thing for the technocrats like Elon Musk to push out universal

basic income to fascify people. And that's what Trump did in twenty twenty with PPP and the Cares Act and your Stimulus Check and things like that. Let's give people a taste of you stay home and I'll give you a check. No strings attached. Well, yeah, there's strings. We'll talk about that later. That's what it's about. Universal basic income. So digital public infrastructures what they call it DPI. We used to talk about printers and talk about

DPI dots per inchment. No, this is about digital public infrastructure. The new scheme, unveiled late last year and moving ahead rapidly, is known as fifty and five. Fifty governments expect to have or well in digital infrastructure of tyranny in place within five years. Almost a dozen governments, including numerous corrupt kleptocracies and socialist regimes, have volunteered their populations to serve as quote first mover

unquote countries. So far, the uns assumption is that every government will eventually impose us on every person on Earth, they say in their announcements quote. All countries, regardless of income level, geography, or where they are in their digital transformation journey, can benefit from being a part of fifty and five

unquote. Run of the campaign helps to ensure countries don't have to tackle the DPI implementation alone or start from scratch, because they've already got a template and they're going to help you do this, And the question is why are we paying for the UN? Why did Trump continue to pay the UN. It's a good place for Nicki Haley to hang out. She was very comfortable amongst other people of her ILK. But why do we have a UN? Why

are we giving them a single cent? You can say that about most of what the federal government does, but this is a program to undermine And as I said before, when you think about these different global organizations, there's a whole lot of these public private partnership type things like the World Economic Forum or the Builderberg Group or whatever they meet. Sometimes they talk about it the World Economic Form. They make a point of talking about that. All the rest

of them. They can point about keeping them secret and quiet, but they're always, you like, every month there is just like an LGBT holiday or something. There's one or two of them every month. And there's one or two of these things every month somewhere, and these people always going to them and meeting in private and exchanging exchanging notes where there's no record of anything, you know, where they're not using the surveillance system that they're setting up for

everybody else. Just meet in public and meet in private, I should say, meet in private and talk to each other and exchange what they're going to do. And so they come up with these things with a UN, and it's very useful for these quasi corporate bodies, like the World Economic Form of Builderberg. They can especially the World Economic Form Class Schwab can get out there

and he can get fundraising and do this publicly. These people can you know, fund this because they don't have global taxes yet that's about to change with carbon taxes. But of course the carbon taxes will wind up going to these people, just like taxes did you pay right now to the irs typically go the military industrial complex or somebody else that's part of the crony capitalism that's coming out of Washington, feathering the nest of the greenwashed investments and all the rest

of this stuff. So again, the UN will develop the program, then they give it to these other organizations to kind of shepherd it through. So it's like the UN is the legislative body, whereas the other ones are going to bring the executive aspect of it and the funding aspect of it. And so as we're looking at this, and remember when Ramaswamy was running, he and Musk had a real heart to heart. They're talking about how it's just

hard to find good help in America. We got to bring people in from other countries because they're so much cheaper, you know, and the two of them were in total agreement about that. Ramaswami and Elon Musk. We just you know, these two people came here to enjoy the benefits of a system that their ancestors did not build, a system that they seek to destroy. And how we got to get more people who aren't Americans and don't buy into

the system any here because they'll work cheaply or whatever. And so they wanted a lot of foreign immigration. Governor Abbott just the beginning of this year led an economic development mission to India. What did he do and didn't come back and report to anybody about it? You know, it's kind of interesting when you see these governors like Brian Kemp in Georgia or this guy in Virginia,

what is his name, Youngkin, Glenn Youngkin. He goes there and they go to World Economic Form and immediately the conservatives, especially the MAGA conservatives, selling us out, selling us out to those people the World Economic Form. They say, well, we're just getting jobs. You know, we just want these businesses to come here and open up factories and give you job.

That's why we're there. That's the same thing that Trump said. But of course they don't say that Trump is there selling us out to clap schwab do they. I think all of them are doing and I think Abbott was doing the same thing. He's going to India and he and visiting there to try to said, get investment in America. But it's kind of interesting. About a week and a half ago, we had the fact that Amazon just walk

out stores not doing too well. They'rehutting them down, and it turns out that you know, they're not using artificial intelligence to figure out what you're buying. They've got one thousand people in India with video cameras watching people and writing down what they're buying. That's their artificial intelligence. What a scam these people are. They will use anything that they can to lie to us and to enslave us. We'll be right back. Sometimes your day needs a little smooth.

Check out the Chazz channel at APS radio dot com and the APS Radio app and leave the stress behind analyzing the globalists next move and now the deep

a nutshell. Well, before we leave the technocracy plans and get into a war, she said, the next place they want to take us, Let's take a look at what's going on with cars, because you should understand that cars are really kind of a metaphor for you with the government, right, cars represent one of the last things that we have that has private ownership and freedom. And so what do you want to do about that? Well, you want to tax it out of existence, you want to ban it.

Ultimately, you want to surveil it. We want to tie it down because it represents freedom. And they really understand that after what happened in twenty twenty, don't they. The car was the one thing that let us escape their regulations. Boy, they had everybody tied down and locked up, whether you wanted to use a bus or a subway, or a plane or a train. Oh, put your mask on. Do you have this? Do you have that? But with a car, they couldn't do it. The big

big loophole for their lockdown plans. So they've got to get the car. So California Governor Knew Someone has announced a plan to install hundreds of AI surveillance cameras in Oakland California said, well, the crime in Oakland is really bad, so this is going to help us to keep you safe. What good is it going to do? And they're going to put in about five hundred high tech cameras there who knows? They just identified as high tech. Who knows? Is it biometric? Real time? What is it? No details

about that. But in his press release statement he calls it an investment. He says it is a step forward. It's for public safety, he says, and in one city, four hundred and eighty high tech cameras, nearly five hundred and one city. It's going to build safer, stronger communities for all Californians. Do you believe that? Of course you don't. It's going to be used just as we see happening in the UK. It's going to

be used against drivers, will be used against internal combustion engines. It'll be used for things like we can't enter the city at certain times because there's just too much of this CO two going out all the time. Right, We've got to control that. So it's going to we're going to shut down certain areas to private cars, and we're going to tax you. Maybe we're going to ban you driving an internal combustion engine, get a big fine like to

do and London with their ultra low emission zones. But it'll be used to follow you and then eventually to ban this. But it's not going to make them any safer. See the problem. Why did this all of a sudden happen. Did Oakland somehow change Why? Yes, And there's an interesting thing that happened. As all this was happening in Oakland and other places, they got these Soros district attorneys that when people would commit crimes, they would turn

them back down on the streets. It didn't matter how many times a police arrested them for these crimes. So you think having a surveillance camera that's going to identify somebody who committed a robbery or raped someone or shot someone, or just general theft going in shoplifting or somebody shoplifting game. You think knowing who these people are is going to help. The guy that killed that cop up in New York had twenty one priors. They just kept letting them out again.

So it's a point of having a surveillance camera certainly not to make people safe. It's not to do anything to the criminals because they've already taken care of that at the District Attorney's office. Now it's going to be used against the people. That's how they're going to use this. So, as I said at the top of the program, people are starting to call these encampments, and they're starting to get big encampments. And it's not just in California,

it's in other states as well. Sedona, Arizona, that's on Route sixty six. It's even in the song I can call Sidona, Arizona, I think. But anyway, it's we're starting to go back to the dust bowl. This is where we're headed with all this stuff, headed back to

Hooverville's. That's what they reference in this Epic Times headline automobile Bidenville's the new shantytowns amid us housing affordability crisis when people couldn't afford housing during the Great Depression, they built shanty towns from scrap construction supplies, and they name them Hoovervilles after then President Herbert Hoover. Today, Americans increasingly live out of their cars because they can't afford housing. If history is any guide, will be parking

lots full of Americans soon be known as Bidenville's. But while this is happening California, you can afford to put five hundred spy cameras, high tech cameras not going to be cheap in one city. But you know, we've got to have some more taxes from you so we can have these, so you can live out of your car. The problem has gotten so bad that Sedona, Arizona, recently set aside a parking lot exclusively for these homeless workers.

The city is even installing toilets and showers for the new occupants. Isn't that kind of them? Yeah? The government is always there to help us, you know. Sorry, you know we have. We have messed up everything by design to the extent that you can't afford a home. But don't worry. We're there for you because it's one thing we know about, and that's toilets, because we're always slinging that stuff ourselves. The average home in the

city sells for nine hundred and thirty thousand dollars. That's the average. Well, most of the housing available for rent is not apartments, but luxury homes targeted at wealthy people on vacation. I don't know what the thing is about that area. I don't know anything about Arizona. I guess Route sixty six

is not the attraction where they've shut that down. It was such a shortage of middle class housing, and with starter homes essentially non existent, low and even middle income blue collar workers have nowhere to go at night but their back seat. Very much like America's Great Depression in the nineteen thirties, this marks

a serious regression of our national standard of living. Shanty Towns were not prevalent in the nineteen twenties but or in the nineteen tens, Nor were there were they around in the Panic of nineteen oh seven, which set off one of the worst recessions in American history. But Americans of the Great Depression faced such a cost of living crisis by the time they got to the nineteen thirties that many were forced to accept a standard of living below what their parents and even

their grandparents had. What they don't talk about it is the fact that this was the last fourth turning the Great Depression. People living in shantytowns and people living in their cars, And we didn't see that happening in the nineteen twenties and nineteen tens and nineteen aughts. We saw it happen in the nineteen thirties when the Great Depression was happening, when you had the Fourth Turning that was going on there, And it's so fast forward eighty to ninety years and here

we are. Countless families are in the same boat. Many young people today don't think the lever be able to achieve the American dream of homeownership their parents and grandparents achieved. We have the worst inflation of forty years, rising interest rates, the collapse of real earnings, a real step backwards financially because every fourth turning is accompanied always accompanied by massive economic unrest. Good news as this too will pass. It is a cycle. Question is what are they going

to put in place afterwards. That's for you and I to have something to say about it right now, because they're in the midst of it and we can still affect this. The housing problem is not limited to wealthy towns at Arizona. However, it's systemic. The monthly mortgage payments on a median price home have doubled since January of twenty twenty one. Rents are at record highs. Like the Great Depression, this disaster stems from bad public policy. I

remember when everything got locked down. I remember it created all this log jams and broken supply chains, and people were destroying milk and vegetables and potatoes on their farms because they couldn't get them to market. You had everybody running out of toilet paper because all the institutions the people worked at or restaurants that they ate at, were closed and they only had toilet paper in certain formats that

they could get to those places. It puts such a shock through the system, and it happened overnight and all of a sudden, you know, when we had these two weeks to flatten the curve. In those two weeks, I remember talking about what happened to the unemployment numbers and comparing them to what happened with a great depression. I said, you had the stock market crash in nineteen twenty nine, but it took a while until the early nineteen thirties

before the unemployment rate really shot sky high. At first, the shock was to people on Wall Street and they're jumping out of the windows and things like that. But you know, then it took a while for it to percolate through with everything. But I said, because Trump shut this down, by fiat, by dictate. We immediately achieved numbers that were greater than they were in the nineteen thirties at the peak of the Great Depression. We got an

instantaneous unemployment rate that exceeded the Great Depression. Of course, the good news about it was that they started pulling back with that, But that was the net result of that, and just underscores how devastating it can be to have a dictatorship like the Trump administration and followed up by the Biden administration. The presidency, folks, is the problem. It is not the solution. Our vision of the presidency of being all powerful and being able to do anything with

an executive order. That is the problem. And it isn't going to be solved by either of these two clowns who have used that. It's not going

to be solved by RFK Junior, not anybody who's running for president. And it's not going to be solved by the partisan hack that populate the rank and file of the Democrat and the Republican Party because they have completely bought into this myth of the omnipotent president, this godlike dictator that's going to turn into that has already turned in Both of these guys have had their boor mere moments since rent and virtually all other prices have risen so much faster than incomes over the

past three years. Even renting is unaffordable today. They make it three years because they don't want to include twenty twenty because that was Trump, you see, and they all do this. This is a zero hedge that's doing it. They've turned into unfortunately, Trump cheerleaders as well. Even renting is unaffordable today, so many people have to go into debt to keep a roof over their head, and for some that's a car roof. Hoover certainly deserved some

blame for the Great Depression. By the way, this is not this is on zero hedge, but it's the epic times. They've always been Trump cheerleaders. So they said that Hoover deserved for it. That's right, isn't it funny? You know he wasn't the only one. They point out that it was progressives of both parties and Congress It said, oh, the government can fix this, we'll do this, we'll do that. Let's have more government. That's the solution, to have even more government. So yeah, the

blame was for all of Congress as well as for the president. But who do they attribute it to Hoover? Why? Because he is the president, he's got the most. He is supposed to be leading. And if he's not leading, if he's letting other people lead, if he is doing the wrong thing or just being passive. You know, like we keep saying, well, you know, poor Trump, he just deceived all these people that he hired, all these people were just really bad and they used him.

Poor thing. No, it's his fault if he was passive, ineffective, or if it was his policy. We always attributed to them. We attributed it to Hoover, we attributed to Obama, we attribute it to Biden. We don't attribute it to Trump, though, do we not? If you're conservative, you don't. So Similarly, President Joe Biden deserves blame for constantly advocating runaway government spending. Today's multi trillion dollar deficits are also made possible by

the big spenders in Congress, who come from both parties. If this bipartisan prodigy prodigality of Washington continues, Bidenville's will only become more widespread as the housing affordability crisis worsens. So again, well, this was originally this originally from the Washington Times, picked up by the Epic Times, then picked up by zero Hedge, and they will not attribute any the Congress. Both parties of

Congress are to blame. Biden is a blame, but not Trump. Yeah, the immaculate perception is what they're selling you behind the e push, a wealth transfer from red to blue regions. Now we already know this person is deeply missing any context because they're already couching things in terms of red and blue. Another article from the Epic Times, another article that is on zero Hedge. President Biden's new EV mandates will likelipood to be a sizable wealth transfer from

rural regions of America to urban sections. I'm going to skip the color designation. This is just too much like professional wrestling and collegiate or professional sports. I'm just sick of red and blue. I really am. March twentieth, the EPA finalizes tailpipe emission rules for the auto industry to begin in just three

years twenty twenty seven. We're only three years away from the fact that they are going to demand that one third of new car sales be plug in electric vehicles in three years and that two thirds of them will be by twenty thirty two. This is a dramatic increase from current EV sales. I guess we've got our five and our fifty and five. This would be one third and three. Why do they come up with that? Do they need my help for catchy slogan? And maybe they don't want you to think of it that

way? One third of the cars in three years gone. This isn't industrial policy, said an energy analyst, Robert Bryce. In reality, it's a type of class warfare that will prevent low and middle income consumers from being able to afford new cars. Yes, yes, And what is the basis for this? Well, it was this climate treaty that we had that was never ratified by Senate John Kerry self ratified it, he said, Obama and I are going to ratify this, and Trump left it in. Isn't tire?

Four years Biden right after the election. Oh yeah, okay, I'll get rid of it, and then it's brought right back in. So it's a kind of class warfare keep you from being able to afford a new car. But I guess you'll still be able to use it for a while as a broken down non running shelter. You just had to find somebody's lawn to park

it on. I guess the report states of the average model of year twenty twenty one EV would cost forty eight, six hundred and ninety eight dollars more to own, almost fifty thousand dollars more to own over a ten year period if you didn't have twenty two billion dollars in government subsidies and favors given to the people who buy it and the people who make it. This's fifty thousand

dollars for the extra for the car. I mean, you look at how expensive they are, ten twenty thousand dollars more expensive than internal combustion engines. Even with all the needless complications put on these internal combustion engines by the EPA, they're still ten to twenty thousand dollars more expensive, and the manufacturers are still losing money, so they've got to have massive sub cities another fifty thousand

dollars per car. This is what happens when the government does central planning. And you've got to ask yourself what is the objective here? Because it is not the mcguffin. That is not the objective. The mcguffin is just the thing that motivates people. Oh co two, Oh you got to get rid of No, that's not what it is. It's about getting rid of the car. It's about getting rid of you. It's about getting rid of your

liberty. These dollars do not take into account the additional dollars the gas car owners will likely pay for their vehicles as the manufacturers are forced to make fewer of them, and of course they'll put Some of this will be offset with some taxes on people who buy an internal combustion engine that runs off of fuel. The new EPA mandate is aimed quote at accommodating a very narrow segment of the auto buying public wealth. The white Democrats who live in a handful of

liberal communities, said Bryce, who is the analyst they're quoting here. EV ownership is largely defined by class, by ideology, and by geography. And I think this is what is interesting about this article is how the profile breaks down demographically and geographically of the EV buyer. And a February analysis of EV buyers, he said fifty seven percent of them earn more than one hundred thousand

dollars annually seventy five percent or mail eighty seven percent are white. Additionally, EV buyers are overwhelmingly Democrats, with seventy one percent of Republicans saying in a Gallop poll that they would not consider owning an electric vehicle. Maybe that's one of the reasons why Musk is reaching out to conservatives. Right, He's always been the central pt barnum of the EV industry, and he became the world's richest man doing that. Is he there to get your trusts? Social trust

him? Yeah? Is he playing forty chess like Trump did? One third of EV buyers live in California. If you count all the evs in North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Mississippi, West Virginia, Alabama, Montana, Idaho, they account for less than one percent of the total US sales. Ironically, Biden is the worst thing that ever happened to this industry,

said one of them. Eves have become Biden cars. So a number of Democratic control states California, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Vermont, Washington are on track to ban the sale of gas powered cars and trucks new ones by twenty thirty five. Of course, that's the California regulation that they have signed on to copy and to mimic and so. And with all

this happening, Musk has announced. First of all, Reuters came out with a statement saying that Tesla sales are way down and Musk has decided not to release a very cheap EV that had been planned. And he pushed back against that and said reiters is line. And then he said, but we do have on the way Tesla robo taxis that we're going to unveil on eight to eight August the eighth. There you go, and there's shares of stocks jumped on that news. So he's going to have robo taxis that are there.

And even as there are trials underway talking about how bad his autopilot is, the people that have been killed, a lot of lawsuits about that, one of them, as a matter of fact, that is rolling out as we speak. And information has come out about how they navigate. Of course, you've always known they used cameras rather than light ar form of kind of radar, they use visual cameras and they look at the lines on the road. Not very sophisticated way of doing it, frankly, and it's one of the

reasons why they have repeatedly crashed into barriers. If the if they're relying on

those lines and all of a sudden the lines disappear or get ambiguous. And you've had this situation happen many times where there is a fork on the interstate and kind of makes a V gets to that V there and it doesn't know which way to go, and it goes straight ahead, and since it doesn't have any kind of light ar, that's looking at the obstacles ahead, and it doesn't recognize a concrete barrier or a semi trailer or a police or firetruck.

It doesn't recognize that. So it's just looking at lanes and it goes full speed and to the concrete barrier that's there at the end of that lane divergence, that V that's there. That's what happened to this guy. He hit at full speed seventy plus miles an hour. Extention rebellion attacks an electric vehicle at the New York Auto Show. Oh, they didn't know that it was electric automobile. Were they angry thinking that it might have autopile on it?

No, it wasn't that. They don't want cars of any type of any type, and neither do the politicians that are pushing you into an EV. The key with all of that was it has to be a plugin that means that they want you on their control grid, the power grid, and they're doing that even as they are deconstructing the power grid, so we know

what the outcome is going to be. As a matter of fact, the crash I was talking about happened back in twenty eighteen, and as part of this discovery and part of the testimony here, they've got a Tesla engineer on there and he's talking about how the system works. And it is kind of interesting to see the Washington Post focus on this because they used to make all kinds of excuses for you, and now they have all kinds of attacks on

him, because that's just the way everything is politicized now. It was always a bad idea, even before he bought Twitter and started doing conservative things, it was a bad idea. But now you see the mainstream media taking every

opportunity to attack Elon Musk and his marketing materials. The company's autopilot drivers system is cast as a technological marvel that uses quote advanced cameras, sensors and computing power unquote to steer, accelerate, and break automatically, and even changes lanes so you don't get stuck behind slow cars or trucks, it said under oath. A Tesla engineer last year described as software as fairly basic in one respect, the way that it steers on its own. He said, if there

are clearly marked lane lines, the system will follow the lane lines. And question is what does it do when those get intermittent or when they're not there at all. So this this trial, it goes back to the death in

March twenty eighteen. This was a driver thirty eight years old killed. The Tesla he was in was on autopilot and it went straight into a highway barrier in California after getting confused by what the company's lawyers described in the court documents as a quote faded and nearly obliterated line A lane line again, one of those V shaped things. And it's not the only thing that keys off of these different lane lines. A lot of cheaper cars do that as well.

It costs a great deal to have that upgrade for autopilot on your car. His car hit the barrier at seventy one miles an hour, Paul, rising the front end, twisting it into an unrecognizable heap. He was pronounced dead hours later. In the months preceding the crash, his vehicle had swerved in a similar location eleven times, according to internal Tesla data discussed by his lawyers during a court hearing last month. According to the data of the car corrected

itself seven times, four other times that required his intervention. It was allegedly playing a game on his phone when the crash occurred. Was that not a metaphor for our entire society? We're kind of all on autopilot, right, Yeah, this whole system is very complicated, but it seems to work. Let's just break out some video games and not think about it anymore. Must set his cars operating an autopilot are safer than those controlled by humans, which

humans his friends who are high on drugs like him. I don't know. I don't know about that. I've been driving for quite some time, as a matter of fact, and I have yet to drive my car straight into a barrier without even putting the brakes on. Steve Wozniak, early adopter of the Tesla stuff, said I love my Tesla, but he goes don't use autopilot. He said, that thing is trying to kill you. He's a good one. I love it, but don't put it on autopilot. Well

that was before this crash. That guy evidently didn't listen to him. And then we have another ev startup company called Canoe CNOO, and what they wanted to do was exactly what Tesla is talking about doing, having electric vehicles that are taxis, except the Canoe thing is it's like a van type of deal driverless van. So you get into this thing and it's supposedly is going to drive you around. However, and it's had a lot of press. I've

seen articles about Canoe for quite some time. But as they point out, the private jet expenses of the CEO were twice the company's entire revenue for twenty twenty three. Something is really wrong about our system, isn't it. And you see it in this story about Canoe, and you see it in the story about Trump's truth social I've said for the longest time that the distortion is

introduced into our economy by Wall Street. You know, when we talk about capitalism and Wall Street, that is not a free market, and a free market we have mom and pops, you know, got stores on Main Street and they're trying to compete against the other guy's better service, better products, better prices, whatever. That's a very different situation than Wall Street. If you get a company it's publicly trading on Wall Street, you can lose money

forever. I first saw this when we're competing against Blockbuster. Blockbuster was a very effective company put together by Wayne Heizinga who got wealthy. I guess his first few billion dollars came from garbage collection, waste management industries or something like that. And some people came up with the idea of you know, Blockbuster, which is a really at the time, really big video store about six thousand square feet and lots of videos. And he liked that concept, and

so he bought it from those guys. You know, they were kind of like the Ray Croc of the McDonald's franchise. So he was the guy who bought it and then took it to the next put it out everywhere. It started replicating it because he had Wall Street well I don't know, he had Wall Street capital with it. But then it was bought by Sumner Redstone who owned Viacom. Viacom was the parent company of CBS and Paramount Studios and a

whole bunch of other entertainment and media companies. And he bought Blockbuster and they never made a profit. They were very profitable under Wayne Heisinger, but they never made a profit under sum To Redstone and Viacom. But they never shut down for more than twenty years. They used them even though they were losing money. They use them because again, remember the Paramount owned by Viacom.

It was one of the seven big studios that were out there. But they used them to establish a different kind of payment paradigm that was profitable for the studios, but not for the small mom and pop video stores. It's called pay per view where they would still rent the videos out, but the video stores didn't own them, you know, they just rented them from the studios.

And so they use that and they started changing the windows of you know, when they had access to it. But the bottom line is that they were able to operate for a couple of decades without making any money and just

keep going. And they were you know, they they even after they broke out Blockbusters Stock separate from Viacom, they were still able to keep it going because of the stock market, and so we're seeing that type of thing with Canoe, we're seeing that type of thing with Trump's truth social they don't have to have much revenue. As matter of fact, Trump for the entire year. You know, first everybody starts to you know, they they offer the

stock out there and the price is really high. And then their financial statement comes out and they only had gross revenues of four million dollars. That's like a McDonald's franchise, you know, single location, four million dollars. That's the gross revenue. That's not their profit. The gross revenue four million dollars. And then off of that, you know, like I said, it's not their profit. They lost the fifty six to fifty eight million. Will

get to it. For the year, gross revenues are four million, you lose fifty eight. Now nobody else would be able to survive that if it wasn't some kind of a stock market scam. And I say scam because that's not capitalism. That is the same type of system that the federal government uses with Federal Reserve. You just operate at a loss, and you continue to do so infinitely, and you just you know, it's like being able to print money out of thin air. Blockbuster can run for twenty years without ever

making a losing money big time every year. Truth Social can have sales of only four million and lose fifty eight million dollars and then they value the company at nine billion with a B. This is a messed up system. And here's another one. Canoe Canoe ceo. The CEO spent one point seven million dollars on jets, private jets, but their gross revenue, all of their gross revenue, was eight hundred and eighty six thousand dollars. And he spends

one point seven on plant. And this is a because it's electric vehicle, because it's self driving. Supposedly, there is articles, happy, happy articles about the future and all the rest of this stuff all over the place about Canoe for years and still they've only got growth revenue of less than a million dollars, eight hundred and eighty six thousand dollars. He spends twice that on jet stuff and then they had a loss of three hundred two million last year.

This is even more extreme than Trump's. They have revenue of less than a million, but they have losses of three hundred million. And you go back and you look at the social media companies and internet companies that were begun by the CIA's Inqutel and these other venture capital firms that were populated with executives from the intelligence community. They allowed Google and many of these others to operate for years, for years, losing massive amounts of money and offering their products

for free. And that is what's happening with the electric vehicle stuff. Canoe just received a boost with a contract from the US Postal System for six delivery vans. Wow, wow, big sale there, six, not six thousand, not sixty six. It's this is all such a scam. But we'll be right back. Tell Alexa to add the APS radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere from country to blues, classic hits to news.

APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, welcome back and let me catch up with some of the comments here on rock Fan Doug Alug, thank you very much for the tip. Thank you. On Rumble Delta Mike eighty three eighty four. Most Americans are in denial thinking it can never happen here. That's true. That's true about the poverty, it's true

about the control, the tyranny, about war. Even on Rumble, Atomic Dog says this is true. I live in southern Arizona, and I have started seeing people living in vans at the park I frequent. It's sad that people can't afford even an apartment. On Rumble, Junior Barner said, I worked at Storm Trouble in West Virginia about ten years ago. I've never seen poverty like these people still living in shacks in the woods with dirt floors.

Unbelievable. Well, that's true, and certainly we don't want to have that kind of poverty, but we also need to understand that whatever is coming, there are still ways that people can be happy. I've looked many times at the writings of people who lived in what we would consider to be unbelievable poverty only just a few generations ago. That kind of thing that he's talking about there in West Virginia was very common, and those people had something that was

very valuable, a couple of things. They had freedom, and they had a faith in God and a relationship with a living God. Those are the types of things that money cannot buy. And as much as we love our modern comforts and I'm not certainly not interested in giving them up or discounting them,

but there are greater things and that's what we need to understand. I think as we look at this ahead and not worry about this, but to focus on what is important, and we need to focus on Christ as King, not Trump as president or Biden as president or having a presidential political fixed to these problems that we have in life. On rumble KWD sixty four, as long as people get a new iPhone every year and compost on social media, things are getting better. Clowns. Yeah, and to that they will

probably add a robot to follow you around. I think that's really going to be a key part of it. On rock Fan Guard Goldsmith good to see Guard, he says I was just going to get an RFK junior, saying he would work to have a constitutional midment to back abortion. Yep, I've got that here as well. Also his retraction on the J six people as being political prisoners. They've a been as much political prisoners as Ed Snowden and Julian Assange, who he said he would pardon but he would look at the

j sixers on a case by case basis. Look, even if somebody got violent, it doesn't justify decades in prison. They don't give people dec aids in prison, and these jurisdictions for murder or rape. So, yeah, it was a political thing. And on rock Fan, Eric, thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. As a matter of fact, let me talk a little bit about some of the emails that I got from some of Yoach just talked about the Tesla robo taxi coming on August the

eighth. Alfred commented on that. He said, it's going to stretch the definition of the English language by quite some considerable degree by laying on a human clad and spandex suit reporting to be a humanoid robot driving a Tesla taxi. We've all seen the carnage unleashed on the roads by Tesla autonomous vehicles. Musk will be doomed to fail quite spectacularly should he foolishly supply a totally driverlest Tesla in August. But it's one of the things, he says. But Musk

is the world's appointed show man, so the show must go on. Yeah, and he is the appointed showman for the green agenda for the CIA and the military industrial complex. Hee, he's their guy putting the satellites up. They're going to make sure that he weathers whatever this is going to be. They can turn the electric vehicles into a loss leader, and they don't care. They've got unlimited amounts of money they can channel to him through hopium on

the stock market, through subsidies from the Federal Reserve. They don't care about any of that stuff, he says. Apparently, the Tesla robo taxi software will allow Tesla owners to allow their Tesla cars to be used as robo taxis.

Who in the right mind would allow their private vehicle to be used to transport complete strangers from A to B. Well, there are some services out there where people do rent their cars to do that, but especially when you start talking about a taxi, that's a different thing than even renting it to somebody to drive it as a rental car. You know, you're talking about with a taxi and you're talking about picking up drunk people and vomit on the

floor. It's what I'm thinking. You know, you start talking about a taxi, the only people who do that are the taxi companies and the car rental companies. Just imagine the legal ramifications involved when private individuals allow their Teslas to be used as robotaxis. Who's responsible when the Tesla plunges off a cliff and sends all occupants to an untimely demise. We'll be Tesla, will be the car owner. Well, it's not going to be Tesla. We've seen

that from the many trials already. They always seem to find a way to wiggle out of that. Insurance companies will read the right Act all Tesla owners and warn them if they allow their Tesla to be used as ROBOTAXI they ain't ensured. You know, they may have the capability to track it and make

some kind of inferences about it. Who knows. I mean, the cars have become not only smartphones, but surveillance devices, which are one of the smartphones are as I pointed out last week, China's got a very large smartphone company that's now just introduced their first car. Eric Peters and I have always said, yeah, they're turning the cars into appliances, specifically into a smartphone,

which has become an appliance water flooridation. I've talked about this trial that is ongoing finally coming to trial, and it's been a long time getting to court. And the cover up actually goes back to the Trump administration, goes back to twenty twenty. Yes, there was a lot of blockage that was put in their obstruction that was done by the guy that calls himself Rachel Levine,

I call him Dick Divine is the rold named Richard. But it goes back to Trump's US surgeon general who was covering this stuff up before the trainee got put in place by Joe Biden. This guy, if you remember him, he was one of the key despots in this whole racket. The surgeon general that was there at the time. His name was Jerome Adams. Do you remember him. I remember how despicable he was as one of the key

spokespersons out there, because they had a lot of them. You know, you had Fauci, had Burke, you had Adams, you had Fauci, you had Francis Collins, and you had the FDA guys and everything. But Jerome Adams was one of those guys. And in his capacity as surgeon General, he was blocking the scientists who worked other government scientists who worked with the

EPA and everything talking about the issues with water flooridation. He was blocking them from getting anything done about it. And this article from Brenda Billetti, PhD. She said, the CDC has called water flooridation one of the ten great public health scams I'm sorry achievements of the twentieth century. Yeah, I guess it really kind of set the template for them, didn't it. We've got a pattern here. You have large corporations paid and ordinate amounts of money to

dump poison onto our water supply or inject it into our bloodstream. That's really kind of the CDC's business model, isn't it. It's their their that's their brief, I guess from the government. And so going back to twenty twenty, this guy, Jerome Adams was who at the same time was pushing masks six foot distance and lockdown and all the rest of the stuff stay locked down

until we get this experimental jab ready for you. He was also blocking any discovery about fluoride, and of course they know that a certain concentrations at lowers IQ. And the question is, when you dump any medication into the water supply, how do you control theage? And are you going to give the same dosage to a baby that you give to an adult male. If you just dump it in the water supply, how in the world can you. And again these people are focusing on whether or not this type of fluoride,

And again there's different types of fluoride. This is an industrial waste fluoride, a product of the nuclear and aluminium industry that they came up with this scam. Instead of having to pay to dispose of this, or instead of having to pay to repurpose it as rat poison or something like that, let's dump it into the water supply and have the cities pay us for the privilege. But over and above whether it is harmful and of itself, even something that

is good becomes harmful and a high dosage. And I've mentioned people dying from stunts where they drink a lot of water. Water in and of itself is necessary for human life. However, you've had situations for for stunts they would have of the one, the most recent one that happened has happened several times. Most recent one was a radio station and they had a bunch of contestants there and they, I don't know, we're playing a game. Something about

the game. They had to keep drinking water, and they couldn't go to the bathroom. And they had a woman who died just because she drank so much water that it, you know, diluted her blood or something like that, and she died from too much water. So how much fluoride is too much? And how do you control the dosage if you dump it into the water. That ought to be the talking point, and yet I don't see anybody talking about that aspect of it. That ought to stop the mass floridation

of the water supply right there. Why would we ever want to mass medicate through the water supply. And that's why this bill out of Tennessee to say, well, you're not gonna We got scientists saying we want to put mRNA in lettuce, Well, why would you do that? You can't control the dosage, And that's the very point of that. They said, Well, you got multiple scientists who are working on this, so let's be proactive and

not wait for people to get hurt. Let's talk about how you're not going to do that here, and we're going to treat it like a pharmaceutical. If you're going to put rugs and we're going to treat like a pharmaceutical. Well, the water ought to be treated like a pharmaceutical in the water. You also don't know what the dosage is. Same argument, and it is not you know, paranoid conspiracy theories. It's rational thought. Dosage makes a

difference. So Jerome Adams, Trump's surgeon General, stopped the scientists who are putting this out and blocked information from it. He's one of the scientists, one of the people they're working on this was Rixy. Stopped him from co signing with eight previous Chief dental officers and releasing a letter supporting the community water fluoridation and celebrating its anniversary. So not only did he shut scientists who are

making these statements down, but he also celebrated it. And that was under Trump. And then this article from Paul He said, I thought you'd be interested in this, and yes, I am very interested in it. Religious faith can be turned off by magnetic transcranial stimulation scientists. Fine, this is a substack from Igor Chuddoff. He says, your ten foil hats will not help you this time. He says many of his whole strong religious beliefs.

Religions are foundational, not only for individuals but to support entire societies. And so who is it that would like to shut this down? I mean when I first looked at this, I thought, well, regardless of whether they can do that or not, who would fund a study? Who out there would say, how can we turn off people's religious faith or something? How can we damage them so they don't have religious faith? Because again, this is a damaging of somebody. This is like saying, well, guess what

you know. I can make people blind by doing this or that to their brain. I can give them a frontal the bottomy and they can't do this or that. And if I shoot this into there and then I can get where they don't believe in God or something like that. Whatever this is, who is it that's funding this? Our government? Our government? Why would our government do that? Why would our government look at some way that they could damage people's brains to where they couldn't understand that there's a God, to

make them, to dumb them down to that degree. And even more so, they didn't tell people what they were signing up for. This is again something we've seen over and over again from the government. It's something that the

EPA was doing to people when they hooked them up. In twenty twelve, as I was leaving North Carolina, the group I was working with god involved with the fact that the EPA there at Research Triangle Park was hooking people up to diesel, exposing them to seventy two times a level that EPA said was safe because and they were looking for people who had respiratory and heart issues, and they wanted to make a case evidently to raise the standard or something.

But that was the time that EPA was doing a big push about fine particulate matter. Can't have fireplaces, can't have barbecues, can't have diesel, can't have all this stuff. We got to shut it down. And Lisa Jackson, who was Obama's EPA person secretary, was in Congress saying, more people are dying. I'm not saying getting sick. I'm saying they are dying. More people are dying from fine particulate matter, you know, stuff that you

find in smokestacks, fireplaces, barbecues, and diesel engines. That's killing more people than heart disease and cancer. And she knew that was a lie. And they brought these people in and they didn't tell them what they were doing to them. And they didn't tell the people who came in for this experiment

either what the purpose of the experiment was. And so Igor says, we can ask a question, can the invisible link between the faithful and God be severed by a third party armed with the tools provided by the latest scientific advances. No? No, what can separate us from the love of Christ? Can life or death? No? Can demons or angels? No can the present or the future? No can the powers of Hell or Washington d C. I know I'm being redundant here, But can they separate us from the

love of Christ? No. They can damage you mentally, they can blind you physically, they can blind you mentally or spiritually, but they cannot separate you from the love of Christ. And so there's not anything in all the creation they can say separate you if you have that relationship, So get that relationship now. They cannot take that away from you. So I said, we don't want to put our hope in government. It is as wicked it

is evil. As one of the prophets said about to to a Jewish king, said, you put your trust in Egypt, You're going to find that it's a cane that you lean on. That's going to pierce your hand. That is government, that is political parties, that's politicians. These people can kill us, they can kill our bodies, they can destroy our minds, but they cannot separate us from the love of God in Christ. They cannot

do that. So this is a study where they lied to the subjects, just like the EPA and I mentioned you know before, or you know to the people that they were given the COVID shots to. They lied to them. They lied to all of us about the COVID shots, didn't they. That was one big lab rat test, wasn't it. Government is constantly lying to people because they work for the Father of lives. The study was extremely unethical. When recruiting study subjects, the doctor running it, Holbrook, lied

about the purposes of the study. He wanted to use electromagnetic waves to reduce belief in God. He offered participants twenty five dollars while promising ostensibly unrelated activities. He said undergraduates were recruited for a study extensibly consisting of a series of unrelated measures in exchange for twenty five dollars. Twenty five dollars and he'll do

a kind of electromagnetic lobotomy on you. He says. Now, as we know to religious people, abandoning belief in God as blasphemy puts them at risk of going to hell, shunning and so on. No, that's not the case for Christians. Whatever these people do to you, that no more would affect your salvation than if they were to kill you. They can destroy the body, they can destroy the mind, but they cannot destroy that security that you have in the hand of God who has given you. As Jesus said,

all the Father gives me, I will not lose one. And that includes the US Air Force doing this study. They are the ones who are behind this and continuing it. Isn't that amazing? It just never ceases to amaze me. How evil and wasteful our government is. This is like the CIA running it's you know, it's a cultic experiments that they've done for years, drugs and occultic things and remote viewing and things like that. This is the Air Force. How can we use electromagnetic waves to try to damage people

so they have no religious beliefs? And it brings up the question, so what is this five G stuff right or something to follow on after it? For years after that Hulbert continue to work on religious neuromodulation and electromagnetic waves to reduce undesirables, in his opinion, people who had religious faith, and what he said was prejudice, prejudice. And so again, you know who sponsors this work, Well, the it's continued and ongoing from the Air Force,

and they sponsored this thing in the first place. I tell you what it's Uh, you know, we've had the people in the Air Force have really been blessed to have total air superiority for sixty seventy years, right, and they don't understand where that blessing comes from. And they really don't care. Do you think Americans asked the Americans if they think in a poll do they think that a president's power should be checked? They all say yes, unless

it's their guy. And see that's the problem. And that's why I speak so much against Trump because Democrats all my life have taken the position that we need to have a stronger central government, that they need to issue orders for our own good, because we don't know what our own good is. But this is something that is relatively new to conservatives. Conservatives have always been no, we need smaller government. Conservatives always repeated what Ronald Reagan said. Government

it's not the solution, it's the problem. But not now, not now, because so much power has been concentrated in Washington and specifically in the presidency, that everybody is fighting over that ring of power, and that's what has to stop. As a matter of fact. Jason Barker sent this. This is a book title that he put together as a satire. He says, I just got this book, and he said, it was totally amazing.

It seems kind of thick, but it's really is a short read. First couple of chapters are dry things like the Constitution, the Bill Rights, boring. Then there's a pledge of allegiance and some lyrics to Kenny Cheesey Chesney Chesney song that wasn't so bad to get through. And after that it's an amazing tale written in vibrant colors of crayon, complete with stick figure illustrations of how great things are. I particularly like the chapter and verse where the helicopters drop

down free cash and we all become rich. The picture I like is on the back, he said, the solar powered grill looks like they were made out of bugs, and I'm sure that was just the artist's creativity. So there we go. It's a six hundred and sixty six dollars after rebate on sale. Now Trump's Art of the Steel, Well, we're going to talk a little bit more about Trump's Art of the Steel when we come back. We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back here.

News Now at apsradionews dot com or get the APS radio app and never miss another story. You are listening to the David Night Show. Well, welcome back on Rumble. Ste Patriot, thank you for the tip. I appreciate that he says, I try God with my eternal salvation. But when they're importing the world and cutting all the resources, we're being put into a killbox. If it weren't for my faith, I'd be terrified. Well, that's absolutely right. We need to understand what that is, and we need to

do what we can to prepare to warn other people. Perhaps we get enough of a ground swell that we can do something about it. We need to understand that liberty is a blessing from God, so fundamentally, we have to one by one fix our relationship with God. I know that that sounds impossible, but it is not, and that's what we need to be looking to and praying for. I think, so with that in mind, let's take a look at the war situation, because that is also very depressing along with

the rest of these things. And also I'll say this, let me just I wasn't plan on talking about this. I'll just say real briefly, a lot of times we go through things we don't really understand what it is. And I've had a few little things. I know a lot of you have gone through a lot worse than I have. But we had a very difficult time. At one point in time, we got rid of our business and

it was this unbelievable scam. The people that bought it. We fought them in court, lost even more money trying to get it back, and it was devastating financially. And I stopped at the time, and I thought, you know, I thought I was doing the right thing. I thought I was getting out of this, and I was getting out of this because I didn't want to be in that business as a Christian. I just couldn't understand why these bad things were happening to me. And as I said, a

lot of people had a lot worse than that. Happened, loss of a loved one, sickness yourself, other things like that. But it was a difficult thing for us. God gives us things that we can that we can handle. He doesn't give us more than we can handle at any given time. And one of the things that I realized after it was we got through it after a number of years, what I realized was that that hardship was really a blessing from God because that gave me a stronger relationship with Him and

it showed me that I could trust Him through difficult times. That's the key lesson. And there's there's not any dollar figure that you could put on something like that. And so a lot of times we go through difficult things, it strengthens as we see God provide just in time for certain things. And so many different things that happened I'm am not going to go into, but you know, when God provides just in time, does it over and over again. It was such a blessing for me and for the family to see

that. The family saw that as well, and you can't there's nothing that is more valuable than that going through difficult times and seeing God's provision, and that was the that was really a blessing. Those hardships were blessing. I didn't realize at the time what is going on with this? You know, is this punishment because it took so long to get out of it? You know what is going on with this? And that was actually kindness to me.

And so that is the way that is God, our Father gives us discipline, you know, for good parents who discipline our kids and because it makes them better. The people who don't get the discipline are the ones that should be afraid. You know, people like Bezos or Gates or whoever. They just go through their merry way, going to all this money and never

getting corrected for any of that. That's a very dangerous thing. Let's talk about the developments in the Middle East first, and we'll talk about Ukraine as well. The IDF ended their active ground invasion over the weekend, completely withdrawing from southern Gaza for now. I wouldn't be surprised to see this happening again. This is happening most likely because of Biden pushing them. He was in

a very difficult position with his base. Most of his base hated this and sided with people in Gaza, especially after the prolonged bombing of civilians, and even Trump said, well, I'm not gonna this is a very bad look for Israel and they need to stop this. Everybody, the vast majority of Americans, both presidential candidates and everything, we're all saying the same thing. So it's necessary one way or the other for Breitbart for Israel to pull back.

Breitbart couches it as a betrayal by Biden, a victory for Hamas. But either way, certainly, I think there was US pressure and the question is what does Israel get out of it. My concern is that Israel has said that they want to get rid of the people there and send them to Europe, send them to the US. Is that part of the deal. Is that what's going to happen. Look out for a betrayal from Biden and

watch for this to start again. And it may even if they pulled their defense forces out after the attacks, essentially direct attacks on Iran by bombing their embassy in Syria last week. What that is inviting is a direct attack from Iran, which Israel and especially the United States have been salivating for for the longest time. Once it is no longer a proxy war, you know, Iran has been using proxies like Hesbala and others to attack Israel, America and

other things like that. But once it is a direct attack by Iran, oh well, then everything changes at that point in time. And that's the concern right now when you look at both Iran and Ukraine, we've had proxy wars, and this is something that's been going on with the Cold War and all the rest of the stuff. Vietnam we had, you know, proxy

fights all these different places. But it's now getting to the point where Europe and even the US and the Ukrainian thing, as well as Israel and then the US and the Middle East are moving from a situation where we've had proxy warfare to direct confrontation, and that direct confrontation is a massive escalation towards World

War three, even perhaps nuclear war with the Russians. Israeli Defense Forces announced Sindy that they had withdrawn their forces from southern Gaza following a demand from Biden last week for an immediate ceasefire quote unquote, a Maas declared victory reports some bright part on that. And at the same time, we have Muslim protesters in America chanting death to America. Death to Israel. This is in Michigan. In Dearborn have a lot of refugee populations that are Islamic that they brought

in to Michigan. Also in to Minneapolis. People I have talked to call it little Mogadishu who've lived in that area. And this is the thing that concerns me. Well, as I said before, will Biden accept these people from Gaza as the incentive to net and Yahu to stop this? Are we now going to be flooded with more people who are chanting death to America, death Israel? Is that going to be the end result of this? I kind of I don't know, but I kind of have a feeling that that

is in the works somewhere somehow. And all this and then we have Mike Johnson, this guy who just came out of nowhere, Louisiana congressman nobody'd ever heard of. And all of a sudden, you know, they're trying to you know, they're taking the number two, the number three guys they can't get elected as speaker after they push out McCarthy, and all of a sudden, this guy appears and everybody votes for him. Well, we're just tired of all this, and he gets in and immediately he does a complete one

point eight on Ukraine and starts pushing it. He was always, no, we don't need to be giving away this money to Ukraine, we need to fix our border. Immediately he goes there and then, as a Christian, he is giving unconditional support to Israel, as so many Christians do. Mike Johnson has pledged to bring up Ukraine aid for a vote in the House soon after Congress returns from their Easter recess in coming days. But nobody knows what

the bill is going to look like. Nobody knows what's going to be in it, nobody knows who's going to support it. It remains unsettled. And so again, what we do know is that this guy has completely changed. The Senate has already passed a ninety five billion dollar package for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, and they did it with bipartisan support. Because Washington is our enemy. They are making us less and less secure. They're not doing

anything for national security or for peace or safety of Americans. Everything they do to put us at risk and to put us at risk of World War III. Things have gotten so bad in Ukraine as a matter of fact that they had a fourteen year old Ukrainian was abducted by a group of Ukrainian soldiers, essentially a press gang. You know, we've seen this type of thing historically.

The British would do that. They would you know, waylay soldier, waylay somebody in a bar or something, knock them out next saying they wake up on a British warship and they're there and they're stuck with that. Well, this is a group of Ukrainian soldiers detained at gunpoint and assaulted a fourteen year old orphan as part of Kiev's push to mobilize more people for the conflict

lines. As he he escaped. Actually once they found out that he was fourteen, he's an athlete and so they thought he was older than he was. You know, just last week I was talking about the fact that they had lowered their age of conscription from twenty seven to twenty five. That's not enough for Lindsey Graham. What you better You get more people out there on the front line, you know, And it's like I cut that guy. He just can't kill enough people and he doesn't care what nationality they are.

Just kill kill, kill, anyway, they said, he began to resist these people. He again was a bigger guy, plays sports. They restrained him and hit in the back with an assault rifle, beat him tight his hands with plastic times, they said. They drove him in complete silence for a while. Only much later they asked his age. When he said how old he was, they didn't believe him, and they asked for his passport. When they realized they were transporting a minor, they threw him out of

the van and he made his way to a village. He walked thirteen They transported him thirteen kilometers from where he was. He went to another village, walked for two hours to get home. In a state of shock, he told his teachers at school what had happened, and they then contacted the authorities and the story went viral in Ukraine. Is a case of kidnap. But look, that is exactly what can That's what the draft is, isn't it. It's that usually evolved the violence up front, but it's to put you,

to enslave you to their war. And it is the intention and has been identified as such by neutral third party observers like military and India. I remember the very beginning of this, they said, well, the intention of NATO in the US is to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian and so it will get to the point where they will kidnap fourteen year olds, but before that it may turn into something worse. World War three is now inevitable,

says Brandon Smith. Here's why it cannot be avoided. He said. In the past few months, there's been multiple instances of European and US officials hinting at the possibility of a new military draft, the EU talking openly about boots on the ground in Ukraine. NATO officials have stated unequivocally that they will not

accept a loss in Ukraine to Russians. We have last week several people highest level talking about how they're going to admit Ukraine into NATO, which is essentially a declaration of war, because since as soon as you know, Ukraine is in NATO and Russia attacks Ukraine, which is happening all the time now, then they have attacked attacked all of the NATO countries. That's the where the treaty reads. And we had Secretary of State Blincoln say that, we had

the head of NATO say that last week. So you got the head of NATO, and you got the Secretary of State of the US saying that they're going to admit Ukraine into NATO. Then there's Israel in Gaza. He said in one months ago in my article that it's a trap. He said, the war in Gaza will expand into a multi front conflict that'll probably include Iran. But of course that is what Israel and the US want. They want to get rid of these proxy attacks. They want direct attacks, like they

want direct conflict with Europe. In the US and Russia. They're going to use these proxies as long as they can, but then they eventually want to get to a direct attack. There's also a large contingent, he says, of capable and mostly conservative men with the background and the aptitude for combat that still want nothing to do with Ukraine. He said. The reason for it

is simple. They believe that a far left Western governments and globalist want to use them as cannon fodder to get rid of them, and once they are used up in war, there'll be no one left to oppose the leftist takeover at home. For most of us in America, where there we're left or right, we have no interest in fighting these people in Ukraine. That's not going to matter in terms of preventing a global war. War with Russia will

depend more on European involvement than US involvement. While the US has been the largest provider of armaments to Ukraine so far. The ultimate goal, he says, I believe is to integrate European troops into the Ukrainian front, which would be an automatic declaration of global war. The basis for mobilization of troops from Europe is the Domino theory, propaganda, the same stuff that we were told

with Vietnam. And then after the war, when Errol Morris did his film The Fog of War and he interviewed Robert McNamara at the end of his life. He died shortly after that, and he got you know, that was his gift as a filmmaker. He could get people talking and confessing to all kinds. Off. He got a guy who confessed to killing cops, and you know, got put on the got one guy off of the death row and another one on. But the guy actually confessed to him, even though

he's recordings. He used to be an interrogator and detective and he took those skills with him and started making films. But he got Robert McNamara talk about that, and magnamara understood that it was a war crime. He tried to divert it by saying, well, you know, if we'd lost World War two, what happened in Dresden, the fire bombing in Germany. He said, we would have been tried as war criminals. Americans would have for that

if we had lost the war. So he's trying to minimize what he had done and equivocate it to that, you know, what he'd done in Vietnam. But he said many years afterwards, he went with American delegation and they met with the people they'd been fighting in Vietnam, and he said, we one of the guys stood up and banged on the table. So this doesn't matter with you Americans. Don't you understand anything about history. Don't you this

Domino theory thing, It's nonsense. We've been fighting the Chinese for a thousand years and they're still have border disputes with the Chinese now now that they have started manufacturing things, and Vietnam and all the rest of this stuff. But he said, you don't know anything about history. You didn't understand what was happening there, and Magnan America confessed that, you know, he's supposed to be the smartest guy with kid and all the rest of this stuff. No,

they get blinded just like everybody else. According to the evidence, it's clear that NATO troops have already been deployed to Ukraine and been there for some time. That was what we heard last week. We had Blink in the Secretary of State and the guy who's head of NATO, both of them saying

We're going to bring Ukraine into NATO. And then you had the Minister of Defense for Estonia and you had Tusk out of Poland both of them saying, yeah, we got troops in in Ukraine already, and all the European countries

have people there as advisors, so they've been there. And of course, as Brandon Smith says, the Russians know this, of course, but it's a different thing to have some mercenaries come in into the guys of being advisors and then sending in openly deploying NATO battalions, which is what these guys, these idiots are doing now. He says, there's really nothing for Russia to

gain by threatening Europe. We saw this happening in as well. Remember it was an annual thing with three years in a row, you know, the first three years of the Trump administration. In the springtime, they would try

to get boots on the ground in Syria. And so they wanted us to believe that even though we were in Syria, involved in Syria, you know, stealing the oil, as Trump was so proud of doing, even though we got involved in that power play there and we're you know, behind the scenes using other proxies and stuff, we were supposed to believe that as the Syrian government was encircling these insurgents and on the verge of victory in a city,

that somehow he decided that he would use the one thing that would be the excuse to bring America into a direct conflict, no longer using proxy, but putting American troops on the ground, and that would be a gas attack against a civilian population. And they pulled that trick three years in a row, and it was a lie every time. And so you know, this is the type of thing that they do. It doesn't matter that you know,

that would be the dumbest thing in the world. He has absolutely no motivation to do that, to do just the opposite, and that's what's true of Russia. To go beyond that, to threaten the rest of Europe. That makes absolutely no sense at all. We understand how the coup in Ukraine, the constant civil war for eight years before this all began, that was, you know, a constant provocation. But there's not anything like that that is happening anywhere else in Europe. And then there is Iran in the Middle

East. Oil will be the primary driver for international involvement, but oil is not what it's about. He says, that is not the end goal. That is just the mechanism to get the US involved, the excuse to get US involve. It is necessary for them, as Gerald Clintya has said, when everything else fails, they take you to war if all of their mcguffins are not working and people are starting to push back against this, or if

it's just going too solely and they can need to speed it up. Almost every one of these fourth turnings, almost everyone is a company by war. It's always economic unrest, always because that's the fundamental thing that's being restructured. You're moving from an agrarian society to an industrial society. So you have a civil war here, you have a civil war in Italy and many other places as they create a nation state and as they change from agrarian to an industrialized

society, and so that same type of thing is happening now. It's always a company by economic unrest because you're making that kind of change, but usually it involves war as well, because it's such a seismic shift in what is happening. The US and UK have bombed Yemen one hundred and forty eight times since January. The US and the UK bombing Yemen. Why what is our interest in Yemen? Why have we bombed them one hundred and forty eight times? Well, because we want war. We want war all the time,

everywhere, as many places as we can get it. According to the Yemen Data Project, a total of three hundred and thirty nine munitions were dropped on Yemen in the first eighty days of the bombing campaign. At least one hundred and forty eight missile strikes have hit Yemen since the US and the UK launched

a new bombing campaign against the Hoodies in January. They said the first eighty days of the US led bombing campaign starting in January twelfth, a total of three hundred and thirty nine munitions hit Yemen, averaging more than four per day. The UK has joined the US in several rounds of missile strikes, but most have been unilateral US attacks on Hoodi controlled Yemen. We want constant war because that's how these people pay off the military industrial contractors. That's how they

practice. They're shooting, they like to have live fire drills, and they don't care what happens to people. Ukraine is striking at Russian oil, deeper and deeper into Russia. It just continues to escalate. Well, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing. Check out the Jazz Channel at apsradio dot com and

the APS Radio app and leave the stress behind Liberty it's your move. And now the David Knight Show, Well let's talk a little bit about politics. We have the FBI arresting a couple three years later after being inside the Capitol

in January the six or twelve minutes. We also have a grandma that has just been convicted, may face a year in prison, two hundred thousand dollars five You know this Civil War movie that is coming out, and you know, there's probably an alternative for this motive for this that Hollywood has as they've got some of the filmmakers and actors doing the rounds and promotion, and it comes out now that you know the president in the Civil War? The guy

who plays a president, is it Nick Offerman? Was that the guy's name that was in that Parks and Recreation? I never saw Parks and Recreation? It was I had for about a year I was working in Austin before the family moved out, and the family found it and they thought it was really funny because it's libertarian and in the city of bureaucracy. Probably know more about it than I do. But they would tell me the quotes from his character, and I always enjoyed them. But in this he plays the president and

he has it comes out that he has shut down the FBI. It's like, well, I know who I'm supporting this civil war. He's got the foresight and the intestinal fortitude to shut down the FBI. He's my man right there, especially since he's got a libertarian background. Of course, in real life, the actor couldn't be any less libertarian than one of the least libertarian people out there. But the uh, when you look at what is happening

to many people. And I covered this one last week, but RFK Junior this week, besides coming out and saying that he's as Guard mentioned, saying that yeah, he's gonna support abortion, make it a federal law, going to federalize it again. Isn't that interesting? You know all three candidates Trump, Biden, RFK Junior, who all promised that they're going to refederalize abortion. Why should it be that way? It's just what I was saying about

the presidency itself. Why put all power in the presidency. Well, because they want everybody fighting over because they want a civil war. Why bring this back? And everything has to be done in Washington. We're not going to allow fifty different approaches to anything and see what works. No, we will

have one solution and it'll be dictated from Washington. And as long as we're going to continue to go down that road, we're going to wind up having more medical martial law and other things like that that we saw in twenty twenty. It's their way or the highway. So all three of them want to federalize it again. Scalia got it right when he wrote the decision. Dobbs

decision says this is not anything that belongs to the federal government. And I hope if they if they write some law like that, that somebody challenges it and takes it back and then to be consistent. I hope the Supreme Court will be consistent with the Dobbs decision and throw it out. I don't think they'll have the courage to do that. I was really surprised that they did

it the first time. Anyway. RFK junior Is sent out an apology because he did a fundraiser where he was talking about the political prisoners juliannesannge Ed Snowden and January sixth protesters, and because he's increasingly moving to you know, supporters are increasingly radical leftists. They got very upset about it, and so he did a retraction saying, well, I don't mean the January the six people.

Oh really, he said first he'd said that all three of them were the Assigne was a political prisoner, that he and the January sixth writers were victims of quote an outrageous miscarriage of justice. Well, I don't know how in the world it is just to have someone given decades for a non violent political protest that is protected under the Constitution. Look, I understand that these

people were led into this thing fraudulently. They were prodded to go by Trump, by his surgates like Alex Jones and Steve Bannon and many others who were doing it to enrich themselves, just like Trump was doing it to make money off of these poor people and to throw them in as canon fodder. And I knew what was going to happen, and I warned everybody about this. But you know, these people are still victims in the same way that a

woman who has an abortion as a victim. You know, they had some Yahoo and Texas came up in murder charges on a woman who had an abortion, and that is stupid. The doctors certainly know what's going on, and they've profited from this, and they should be charged with murder, but not the woman who's been deceived. And you know, and that's the way it is with these January the sixers. I feel sorry for them. I did what I could to warn them, and my conscience is clear on that.

It's a matter of record what I said, and I posed it from two days after the election, I posed, the lies are being sold by Alex and Steve P. A. Chinnik on info Wars and the rest of them on info Wars. I opposed has stopped the steal. I opposed Trump's stuff. I said, Trump is the one who put in the vote by mail thing, and they're still leaving it in. And so that morning, January sixth, that was a Wednesday, Tuesday, they'd had the runoff election.

The Democrats won both Senate seats and Democrat and for the Democrats in Georgia because they'd run by the same rules. And I said, why didn't they fix that in Georgia at least where you got a Republican state legislature and a governor, why don't you stop that vote by mail fraud? But they didn't. And I told everybody, I said again the very last thing in the program, I said, don't go to January sixth. It's a trap. There's

going to be agent provocateurs there. You're going to be at risk. They're going to use this to come after the conservative movement to paint it as a rebellion. Don't follow these people. They're just trying to rip you off. But this is the quote that RFK Junior put in there. He said,

the Brits want to make sure that our government doesn't kill Assange. This is the reality that every American citizen faces, from Ed Snowden to Julian Assange to the Jase activists sitting in the Washington DC jail cell stripped of their constitutional liberties. Ooh, then they retracted it. They said that was put in there by one of our new marketing contractors. Though he doesn't support them, he doesn't think that they have been stripped of their constitutional liberties. They have,

they have. In an interview last month, Kennedy said he won't speak about potentially pardoning rioters until he wins the general election. Let me tell you, if somebody walks in, they got this grandmother who's now facing the things she went in and prayed. You have people like Sam who walked in taking pictures. They've come after so many people who just walked in. They are not

rioters. They're not rioters, they're activists. They were misguided what they thought was going to be possible and what was going to happen, but it was not. It was constitutionally protected speech. If anybody got violent, they deserve jail, but they don't deserve decades of jail. So Kennedy said he won't speak about potentially pardoning the writers until he wins the general election. He said he would approach it on a case by case basis, but he said he

would pardon Snowden and Assannge. So again, you know who cares about policies. We've got these marketing people out there right Meanwhile, with all the stuff that's happening in Congress with the Speaker Johnson, Marjorie Taylor Green goes on with Tucker Carlson and he floats the question is Johnson being blackmailed? And then she repeats that later on, and so that becomes her quote that has attributed to

her everywhere. She said, he's made a complete departure of who he is and what he stands for, and to the point where people are literally asking is he being blackmailed? What is wrong with him? Because he's completely disconnected from what we want. And again that she said that after Tucker Carlson said is he being black mailed? She said, I have no idea. I can't comprehend Tucker. But then she comes back and repeats that he gets her

in trouble. But again, I don't know that it's blackmail or if it's bribery. You understand it could go both ways. And they don't have to explicitly give him any money or anything. I mean, they could have bribed him with a speakership in a very subtle way. People don't have to come in and be as crude as to say, well, here's a quid pro quo. I'm going to put you in a speaker, but you're going to do this and this. They put him in as speaker, and he was

going to be able to read the room. He's going to know what they want. They want money for their Ukrainian war and all the rest of his stuff, and he is more than willing to sacrifice his principles. If he had any too, and he appeared to have had some, He's more than willing to sacrifice those and do a one to eighty on all this stuff in order to keep that power. That is a sense of bribery. You know that you're going to lose that position, you will toe the line with it.

And Travis is telling me, I need to remind everybody to like the stream. Please like the stream. That really does help us much needed with visibility. And again we haven't gotten to the money stuff yet. But when you look at what is happening in gold, gold is up three hundred dollars in the last couple of months. It's gone for it was hovering around for quite a while around the nineteen hundred two thousand levels at up to a twenty three hundred. I don't think that's the end of it. And of course

it's going to fluctuate back and forth as everything else does. But it's been pretty steady, steady rise. It's not real volatile. But again, if you want to hedge this digital id, this CBDC stuff, the inflation, the economic unrest, it's on the way. A great way to hedge that is with gold. That's what the wealthy people are doing, That's what the central banks are doing. You might ought to think about that as well. And you can go to Davidknight dot Gold. That'll take you to Tony Arden

and he can help you with gold or silver. He can lock in the price, he can handle small or large transactions. He can even help you to accumulate it on a monthly basis as part of a buying group. He calls Wolfpack to get the better price again. Davidknight dot Gold will take you to Tony Ardabin and known Tony for a long time. And now you know, this is what everybody's been talking about. Is gold going up? As Gerald was saying on Friday, he said, so at the beginning of the

year. You know, this is going to be a golden year for gold

because of the unrest and the inflation chickens that are coming home to roost, as well as the war issues and all the rest of it. But getting back to Marjorie Tillergreen, and she says what happened? She says, you can't help a question, what do they have on him? Well, again, I think it's the bribery of power. It's how easy, by the way, is it going to be to bribe Trump over truth social That's a

question that Time magazine was asking. They said, you know, if Trump gets elected again, it'll only be the second time since Grover Cleveland did it. Somebody who loses an election, waits out for four years, then goes back a second time. Grover Cleveland did that. But it will be the first present since him to move back in the White House after four years of

being out. But unlike Grover Cleveland. He is also going to come back in with a big company traded publicly traded on the stock market NASDAC that even bears his initials. DJT said, it's entirely possible that the multi billion dollar valuation of Trump Media and Technology Group will have cretered by the time the inauguration day arrives. However, again, as I mentioned early the program, all

the revenue is not as bad as canoe that I talked about. But when we look at Trump's social they had about four million dollars about what you would have from one typical McDonald's location. That was their gross revenue. But they lost fifty eight million dollars off of that, and then it had a nine billion dollar stock evaluation. Now, of course it dropped a little bit after people realized that they only took in four million and lost fifty eight million.

But time says, imagine the whole world spending four years tracking the ups and downs of Trump's media stock in real time as they speculate as to whether or not any movement connects to the Trump administration's policy decisions. And you know that's they're going to be bringing that up, whether that there is a connection or not, the media will connect it to that. So concerns they said about his political positions being for sale are not exactly new. Trump reverses position on

a TikTok ban after meeting with Mega donor Jeffrey Yass. Even Steve Bannon said it's yas coin that changed his mind because Bannon wants to ban TikTok. Trump wanted to ban it. I don't think it's a wise decision, but what changed his mind? I haven't changed my position on it. Fifteen percent stake in TikTok is what Jeffrey Yass has, and he also has a two percent foothold, and Trump's truth social and so the question is what is going to

happen around that. I think it's also interesting that as Trump doubled his fortune on paper, at least it's a paper increase. Who knows what the price of the stock will be when he sells it, and he's got so much in it that when he makes these, when he sells stock, it's going to have an immediate impact on the overall value of it. But he's also

fighting for every last bit of it. The guys who came to him and put it together were a couple of people who have been Apprentice contestants, and in exchange to put this thing together, he gave them an eight point six percent stake in it. Pretty much kept the rest of it. But it's not enough for him to have ninety one point four percent. He's going to have one hundred percent. And so there's a back and forth. While he

tried to squeeze them out. They sued him, he's countersued them. He's got four lawsuits going over this trying to get that last eight and a half percent. There. Dueling lawsuits only highlight just how much chaos the former presence ill advised stock market bid has already caused. Yeah, as everybody talks about poor Trump and all of his law fair well, they don't point out is

the fact that he's initiated a lot of this stuff himself. And yet even as his company was losing money fifty eight million dollars, the people inside the company were making millions. That's how it brings in four million and loses fifty eight million. What was it that was that for you know, electricity and computers and stuff. I that was hanging out millions of dollars to these various people people like Devin Nunez who was the chief of the CEO and president.

He got four point six million in addition to a seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars salary that increased to one million this year. See that's what I was talking about when you talk about a mom and pop, main street store that has to make money by competing with people, versus a Wall Street corporation where you can take in you can have gross revenues of four million dollars and yet pay your CEO four point six million in addition to his seven hundred and fifty

thousand dollars salary and a bonus of a million dollars as well. And he's not the only one. That's how it got up to fifty eight cash. Ptel, a former aid to Nunez paid one hundred and thirty thousand dollars and he's up for bonuses and as well. Uh and and on and on, Dan Scavino, all these different people getting millions each. Other executives received a

total of one point two four million in bonuses. So a chief operating officer who used to work for Parlor, now he's made over a million dollars of this and then there are four different lawsuits happening because it's just not enough money. It's got to have that last eight point six percent. He's going to squeeze these guys out who started this whole thing going. But getting back to these people at January sixth, again this this grandma was speaking out. This

is sent to me. This is off of info Wars. A jury convicted a seventy one year old woman facing a year in prison more than two hundred thousand dollars in fines for going into the Congress building praying for ten minutes. And when I saw this, I thought, what nerve Alex Jones and info Wars have putting this up. Yes, she is a victim of victim of him. And then they've got an interview with her talking to Steve Bannon who egged her on, and now he's there holding her hand and crying crocodile tears

about what has happened to her. We're talking about this with my sons, and you know, one of them said that this is like some guy with a camera who wants to get a viral video and he tells this person go over there and poke that bear with a stick while I film it. You know, and they do. They get mauled, and you react to the person who did this, who sent them over to poke the bear with a stick, and they say, well, you're pro bear. I'm not pro

Biden. I think what Biden is doing is reprehensible. I think it's excessive. And as a matter of fact, in this article, nowhere in this article does I talk about Drey nullification. It does mention she said, twelve twelve members of a jury. They deliberated for twenty six hours. She said, well, it was good because it was obvious that at least one person on the jury was fighting for me. That's all she needed. She should have used Dury nullification. I know that this whole thing is rigged. These

trials are kangaroo court. They're having them in DC because the people on the jury. But here she is, he's got one person who's looking at this. Now, what was there concern about this? Say, with jury nullification,

was there a question as to whether or not she was overcharged? Perhaps, but it might have also been because this is another part of jury nullification, that if somebody's penalty is incredibly out of line for the crime, even if somebody has committed the crime, if they believe that the law is wrong or the penalty is out of line, then the jury has the right and the duty to nullify that law. That should have been argued as a matter of fact. You know, if I was in a situation like that,

I would you know, have said many times it usually is true. The person who defends themselves has a fool for a lawyer unless you're going for jury nullification, and then you can't get a lawyer to argue that. And I think that's what some of these people showed down. But there's never any discussion of that. And of course it is outrageous and unjustified what the Biden administration

of the FBI are doing to people. But she said, and the amazing thing about all this was she said that told Steve Bannon the reason she went there was because God led her to go there. And I'm sorry, but God did not lead her to go there. Alex Jones, did Trump? Did Bannon? Did you know? When you hear voices or you get a feeling or urging or leading or something to do something, you still have responsibility to check that and to have some discernment. Is this God's speaking or is

it something else? Is it me? Is it something else that's speaking to me? You need to have some discernment about that, and you also need to have a discernment that includes common sense. If you're getting a leading and urging or hearing voices telling you to jump off of a roof, well maybe your common sense should tell you that's not a good thing for you, and

your discernment should tell you therefore, it is not coming from God. It might be coming from Trump, or from Alex Jones, or from Steve Bannon, because we know exactly what Bannon was up to. Here's the audio clip as a matter of fact, And what Trump's going to do is Claire victory.

Right, He's gonna have a Claire victory. But that doesn't mean the way it's just going to say the les the Democrats, more of our people vote early, they count, they're voting May, and so they're going to have a natural disadvantage and Trump's going to take advantage of That's all right, He's going to clear themself a winner. So when you wake up Wednesday morning,

it's gonna be a firestone. I'm gonna have been tea from crazy, the media crazy, the courts are crazy, and trump'sll be sitting there marking between you lose, I'm the winner, I'm the king, and you'll be all over He'll be He'll be going, where's Hunter's Hunter on a crack pipe? I mean no, he'll be because then it doesn't matter. Remember, here's the thing. After that, Trump never has to go to a voter again. He's gonna fire ray the fbid dress, fire the seams. But

because he's never gonna he's done his last election. Oh, he's gonna be off to chase be crazy. Also if Trump is if Trump is losing by ten or eleven o'clock at night, it's gonna be even crazier'n no, because he's gonna sit right down said they stole them. I'm directing the Attorney General to shut down all battle places in all fifty states. It's gonna be enough. He's not going out easy Trump that Biden's winning. Trump is gonna be so crazy. Yeah, so I'm gonna go down easy. This is the

plan, right, we create this vote by mail thing. It's going to create chaos and fraud. We're going to say that we won and we're gonna come after them completely. And then he goes Then Bannon goes to that was then that was two weeks before the election. Then most recently he went to Seapac and he said this about Trump is going to take the trash out in

destiny, is to have the greatest political comeback in American history. And on November fifth, to drive the vermin out of sixteen hundred Pennsylvania Avenue, and let's put some new trash in Prime. Family are nothing but trash. Okay, And on the twentieth of January of twenty twenty five, we're going to take out the trash and we're going to have all new trash. Well, well, we'll bring back the Trump track. Then there. Look, he says he's going to be off the chain. He's not gonna have to go

to the voters. He's no more election. Same thing is true of Biden. Think about that this next election, whoever is president, whether it's Trump or Biden, is going to take us through the end of the fourth turning up to twenty twenty nine. They're both going to be off the chain. They're both going to be I don't care what anybody says in the vernacular of Bannon, fu, I'm going to do whatever I want to We've seen both of them do that. Both of them don't even have to pretend to care

what you think anymore. And then we have, after all of that, this this grandma who has followed these people, had this to say. She goes on with Steve Bannon. Rebecca, what did God tell you when you prayed to God in Cholora Springs your after your son called you and you prayed before you went, What did God tell you? You just told me you need to go and stand up for your country, you know, and stand for truth. I've just been always a lover of truth, so I just

couldn't sit back. And that's basically what it said. And then as I got there, I realized the main reason I was there to stand up for my covenant. I'm a very strong believer in covenants, and covenants with God are a higher authority than what the government is maybe saying. And so I know that my battle is not against flesh and blood, but it's against against

spiritual principalities and powers, and they always win. One of my lifelong verses is John ten ten in the Bible and says the thief comes to kill, strill and destroy, but God came to give us. Jesus came to give life and life event abundantly, and that particular case in this application that she's talking about, the thief would be people like Bennon that she's talking to, Trump, Alex other people like that. They come to steal and destroy your

life. You've got to have the discernment to understand to distinguish a voice that is telling you to do things that are going to harm you versus a voice that is telling you to do the right thing thing in spite of the consequences. It's a difficult thing. Look, I don't feel good about criticizing her, but I'm just saying we've got to have the sermon. And she still doesn't understand who the players are. She still doesn't understand what's going on.

So blinded by her love of Trump, she needs to focus more on Christ and on God and rather than on this person who is Antichrist with a lower

case A for now, because that is the issue. When you look at the amount of money that they made. And again, Biden had his fundraiser with both Clinton and Obama made twenty five million. Trump had one. Over the weekend he made fifty million. Now, to put that in perspective, they're already just one fundraiser. These guys got about as much money as was

spent in the two thousand election for George W. Bush Al Gore. The DNC and the RNC combined at that point in time, the RNC and the Democratic National Committee together spent eighty million dollars on TV ads for the presidential campaign. These two guys just made seventy five and it was far more than the sixty seven million that was spent in the previous election, and that was with

Bush and Gore. And so the amount of money that was being spent total for that, you know, both political parties, both of the campaigns directly one hundred and forty seven million dollars. And yet look at this, they got about they got more than half of that and just two fundraisers, these

two guys. And then it got even more expensive when you got to the two thousand and eight campaign, the costliest in US history up to that point, had a record chattering five point three billion dollars spent by the candidates, the political party, the interest groups, the congressional and presidential races. The nominees Obama and John McCain. In two thousand and eight together spent more than a billion dollars, unprecedented amounts of money, and yet it continued to go

up. When we look at the two thousand and eight election, again, Obama spent raised seven hundred and seventy eight million dollars, McCain three hundred and eighty three million dollars. Compare that to Chuck Baldwin who got two hundred and sixty one thousand, two hundred sixty one thousand, And they look at how much they spent per vote that they got. Obama got spent eleven dollars per vote that he got, McCain six dollars per vote that he got, Chuck

Baldwin one dollar for every vote that he got. But of course it's ballid access, which is really where the real issue is. But they go up significantly. You look at the twenty two thousand election, winner George W. Bush spent about one hundred million dollars, and you know, with him and

the RNC and other people for that, Al Gore accused him of buying the election because he had about seventy if I remember correctly. But if you look at the winners, the winner in twenty one hundred, the winner in two thousand and four, two hundred and sixty, and that was just in the primaries, George W. Bush, who was the incumbent, and then you have Obama in two thousand and eight, you know, just under eight hundred thousand dollars. And it continues to go up exponentially with these people. And

so I thought it was interesting to see this statement from Michael Brown. And he's he's a Christian who writes on he's a pastor, I guess who writes on Christian post and WND picks up his stuff and he talks about his experience with Trump, and he says, you know when I in twoenty and sixteen, he said, I wrote this, He said, Trump is not your

protector. A warning to conservative Christian He says, Trump has presented himself as a protector of conservative Christians and as the best friend that Christians will ever have. He has held up his mother's Bible, He's pledged to bring Christ back into Christmas. But when the rubber meets the road, he's anything but a defender of conservative Christians and the values, he said. And I ended it with an even stronger caution. I said, if you're a Trump supporter,

you might say, well, I know he's not a Christian. I don't even think he's a real conservative, but I'm voting for him because I believe he's the best man to fix our economy, protect our borders, and so forth. He says, but I beg to differ, and he said, I think you're going to be sadly disappointed. And he said, then then he said, I wound up voting for him because it was between him and Hillary. And he said he really liked his twenty sixteen presidency. He liked

the justices that were conservative ish, is what I'll put it. They put on Supreme Court. He had an executive order overturning the Johnson Amitment, which would say that you can't talk about politics and churches. But of course that

wasn't necessary. That already been shut down by the civil disobedience of pastors who called the IRs' bluff on it. He doesn't say anything about the executive orders to lock us down, to do warp speed, to do the masks of social distancing, and all the rest of the stuff, or the financial chaos that ensued, or the death that ensued, and all the rest of it. But he does pull it back and he does say, look, start to focus on Christ and not on politicians. There is not a good case

to be made for Trump. There's even a scarier case be made for a second term of either Trump or Biden. As I said before, we turned them into idols. We turned them into little demi gods, and then we're ready to have a civil war over who is going to have that lever of power. He said. By worshiping Trump and focusing on him, he said, we damage our witness. We drive Americans, many young Americans, away

from Christ. So that is absolutely true. Have a good day. Let me tell you the David Night Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else. You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.