Mon 22Jul24 David Knight UNABRIDGED - Bye-Done Insurrection & What's Next

Using free speech to free minds. You are listening to the David Night Show. As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the twenty second of July. Here of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to begin, unfortunately with the and I say unfortunately because I'm sad to see the guy go. But Biden is leaving. We're going to talk about that insurrection, and we're going to talk about who's next, but we're also going

to talk about who's running. It's more important to look at who's making these decisions in the background, and to look at who the people are that are controlling not only Biden but also Trump. The same people that are running they show at Bilderberg, same people that are pushing for universal basic income, and yet we have all of the Republicans falling down and worshiping Trump. Yes,

it is a miracle. Truly is a miracle. They say, well, we'll take a look at an interesting parallel about somebody else that was saved from an assassination attempt. We will be right back. Well before we get into

the insurrection and the resignation. They wait, didn't actually resign, He's dropping out of the race. But he's staying as president, which is exactly what Mark Halpern had said last week, and and I point out on Friday, Yeah, it looks like that's the way it's going now. And yet there was still indications that there was a lot of fighting that was going on. Still the very last minute you had Bill and Hillary sidling up to Biden. But of course, you know, this is what people do in politics.

They are moving for their own purposes. And it's interesting to see everybody predicting who is going to take his place as if it matters. And this is what I want to talk to you about. It doesn't matter. These people are being run by the same people that run Davos, they run Bilderberg. It's the the corporate technocracy that is sidling its way in here. The donors are putting a lot of pressure on all this stuff. But everybody's got their

favorite. You know, we're going to play this what if game. It is a reality TV show, and so you've got a lot of people say, well, it's going to be Michelle Obama. Other people say it's going to be Hillary Clinton. Other people say it's going to be Gavin Newsom, and on and on. Laala Harris is a lot of people are saying that even inside the Democrat Party, they want to push her out, and there's reasons for that that begin with a dollar sign and they want to get rid

of La La Harris. So we're going to talk about this. They said, we're going to follow an orderly procedure based on rules. No you're not. You just threw a while just through all of your rules about doing this stuff. So we'll talk about with another's going to be legal challenges, any basis for these legal challenges, exactly how this works. It's important for people to see how this works because it's this ignorance of the place odal system that

predicates people's worship of politicians. It predicates people putting their faith in Washington, the district of criminals. And if you see how this is all being done, it's like seeing sausage being made, and you may not want that. If you see the ingredients that are going into this and the process of how this is working, that's my point in doing this. Otherwise this is just a silly professional wrestling exercise like you saw at the RNC with Hulk Hogan.

You know, the outrage ripping my shirt off. Yeah you want a piece of me, Yeah, come and take it, that type of thing. So we'll take a look at all this stuff. But I want to begin with a brief recap of where we were last week, and as we were about midweek, and of course the Republicans were sucking all of the oxygen out of the media. Between the shooting in Pennsylvania and the RNC convention, nobody was talking about the Democrats. And isn't it interesting that as soon as that

all ended, now this is running. It's almost like it was a script, because it is a script, it is a pageant, it is a wag the Biden, as I said the longest time, it's exactly like that. Everybody know they've planned this out, meticulously, meticulously planned. And I said this from the very beginning. I said, look at how far ahead they put the debates never been done before, and gave him plenty of opportunity

to flush the guy out. And then the same people that were raising money for him, Clooney and Obama immediately said, well, you know he can't, Yeah, he's he can't run. They knew all that, we all knew all that. There's no way that they didn't know it, and so that's why they scheduled the debate so early, why they scheduled the convention so late, and why they've only scheduled one more debate. All of this is to prepare the public. And I say this because you do have these people,

even though they're being run by the same people. There is a very real competition for these people. It's very real for them, this game of thrones. There's a lot of money and power, which is the only thing these people respect. A lot of that is at stake, and I mean, you know, that's what helps to sell the illusion, is to have these people who were completely in it for their own personal, selfish reasons. So about midweek last week, we were told that Biden had tested positive for

COVID nineteen, had mile symptoms and he's like, I'm getting better. You know, they pop him over the head and throw him in the cart. Anyway, But you know, when we go back and we look at the vaccine that he pushed so hard, Trump's vaccine that he pushed and mandated everywhere. As I was coming out in Saudi Arabia, they had a Saudi National study that said most of the people that they looked at who were vaccinated experienced

the disease shortly afterwards, and sometimes not just a respiratory disease. But of course, as we've seen and been reporting for years, many other situations, eighty two percent of them had a side effect. This is coming from trial site news, and so they would get what they called COVID, or they would get sick in other ways, and so it's not effective and it's not

safe as a matter of fact. Isn't it kind of interesting that we could say the same thing about both the Trump and Biden administrations ineffective and unsafe. They should be declared illegal. A team of researchers in Saudi Arabia looked at subjects O where Saudi participants, both genders, ages sixteen and up, who'd received at least one dose of any available vaccines in Saudi Arabia. The results

of this study are troubling, to say the least. Well, I guess we can just kind of dismiss this, say, well, this only has this kind of outcome with Arabs, right, we don't have to worry about it if we're not Arabs. See, this is the elephant in the room. Then nobody talked about it at the RNC. Nobody talked about the wonderful Trump shots. Did you hear Trump beating his chest? I'm the father of the vaccine. All you people out there, you don't really like it,

but you should. It's great. It's a sugar water take it for Trump, right, None of that. None of that. His surrogates and media, we're not telling you it was sugar water. They're just ignoring it and

hoping that you forget. I'm not going to forget. I'm going to keep reminding you as a matter of fact, and you need to keep reminding other people of what was done in twenty twenty when this guy stabbed us in the back, when he destroyed the constitution, when he set up medical martial law, when there was a coup against our constitution, and the coup and the martial law were soft this time around. It's going to be much harder next

time because they are hardening these precedents that are there. You want to know who's responsible for all this stuff? We should start calling the pandemic who done it? Because it was the who It was the World Health Organization and people of that ILK. It was that Kebal, that globalist public health cabal.

They've done it. We know exactly who done it. It was the who don't get fooled again, an overwhelming identification of side effects, plus nearly thirteen percent of the vaccinated shortly thereafter experienced other diseases, raising troubling implications based on the accumulation of studies suggesting problems. This is not anything new, but I will keep giving you studies as they are finally being done. You see, this is one of the reasons why when President Trump said, well, you've

did it faster than anybody else. This is why it takes time. You should be doing a test before you vaccinate billions of people with something that's never been tried before, except it has been tried and they knew that it was killing people, and they rolled it out anyway. Just like the RSV vaccines I talked about last week, you had in their clinical trials twelve infants who died. Well, let's do it anyway. Now we've had another two that

died right after getting the shot within hours. And we've known this for a very long time. Sudden infant death syndrome and many other things I've played for you, the tearful realization of a mother I poisoned my child. I thought I was doing the right thing. She finally realized when they started playing these same games, calling it sudden adult death Syndrome of the vaccinated. She realized, that's what sids want. So when are people going to realize what was

done to them? Well, we've got the big spectacle, we've got the shooting and all the rest of this stuff. We don't need to worry about what happened in twenty twenty. As Tim Pole said, that's so four years ago. But they keep talking about other things that happened four years ago, like the election. Oh, that's not over for them. But all the stuff that Trump did leading up to the election, even what Trump did to destroy the election. He was the one responsible for vote by mail folks.

It wasn't Biden, it was Trump. And so is Trump at Trump or did he do it in conjunction with these people, these globalists, who's now going to get a lot of money from these technocrats, these Davos Bilderberg people. They're poning up the cash as soon as he put in their VP candidate.

So those had better, larger real world studies should be funded. Yeah, yeah, post vaccinated registry, we should have one of those and sixty eight percent of the people in this study in Saudi Arabia got the Fizer vaccine, and in Saudi Arabia is kind of significant for them because they got eighty percent of the population vaccinated, sixty eight million. How many of these people are going to die or have died already from this stuff? How many millions

of people? Is Trump directly responsible for the death of by using your tax payer money to create a poison and send that shot around the world, and then Biden turning it in on Americans specifically, just as everybody else is mandating it as well. That was the plan. It was a tag team. Yea. Hal Cogan says, Oh, this is the best tag team I've ever seen you talking about Trump and Vance. No, the best tag team is Trump and Biden, Trump Biden, Trump, right back and forth shuffle.

The most recent study publishing the International Journal of Health Sciences points to a very high rate of reported undesirable effects. As they say, yeah, death, it's an undesirable effect. Being a crippled the rest of your life, that's an undesirable effect, isn't it? Totally? Eighty two percent of the studies participants, So that's in Saudi Arabia. So let's go back to the

politics behind all of this stuff and the agendas behind all of it. And of course what we were hearing last week was first Biden said, well, I'm not moving out unless God wants me to. In other words, you can take me out feet first. We've seen these politicians do this over and

over again. And at the beginning of this I really thought he was going to hang on to power, because I've seen that happen with Diane Frankenstein, who they were complaining about the fact that because of her senior she was presiding over the Judiciary Committee, they couldn't get judges appointed for the Democrats because she had to do it, and she was gone so much of the time, and even when she was there, she was not there. It was a

big problem. She had completely checked out. And then prior to that, we had Darth Vader Ginsburg, who didn't want to leave the Supreme Court, and so they were angry about that because that allowed Republicans to get another pick in there. But I still thought that he had enough power there that he would keep it, and they were very reluctant at the beginning to start to come out and then it gradually built this whispering campaign that began the donors and

so forth. And so last week what we saw was as he announced that he had COVID, he had also said, well, I may drop out for health reasons, and then he said I've got COVID. I was like, oh, oh, it looks like you know not, Oh, but it looks like he's going to drop out. And then we had the statement for Mark Calprin, who I think it was. I think he made it on Thursday. I covered it on Friday, and he was very specific about the insiders and I read you what it was, but the key points were

that Biden was going to resign and it would happen on Sunday. He said this on Thursday, and he said he's not going to resign. He's going to drop out of the race, but he's not going to resign the presidency. And I said at the time, it's because they don't want to see Lala Harris in there for a number of reasons. She's not well liked. They want to get to the money that is there as part of the campaign, coffers and so forth, And it's all going exactly according to plan and

I'll tell you what their plan is. Specifically. You've got an op ed piece that was also put out just hours before Biden resigned, talking about what a hero he would be if he resigned, how well he would be loved by everybody, and how the process is going to operate done by people who are on the inside, people who are running the DNC, Zogby and another guy, former governor who has who is high ranking on the DNC as well

as having been on the rules committee. And so they talk about how they're going to set this thing up, and we'll talk about that coming up. But all this was just building up to last week. And he says, well, you know, if I'm sick, maybe I'll resign. Then he says, oh, I've got COVID. You'd had Adam Schiff, who is nothing but a mouthpiece for Pelosi. If Biden is our nominee, we will lose everything, he said. Schumer said best for him to drop out.

Obama was really behind the Clooney op ed piece. Clooney had shown it to him, gotten his comments on whether or not Obama gave him talking points or whatever. It was very clear that Obama was orchestrating this from the back and that Pelosi was orchestrating it from the back. Schumer then comes out publicly about it. CNN and other media were preparing the public for by telling everybody, look, Trump has got three hundred and thirty electoral votes. It's going to

be a route, you know. So there's all that stuff that is happening because they're preparing people for their to that they're going to change horses in midstream. But that was always the plan. So the one thing that I thought was, well, maybe you know, he's going to push back on this. Biden came back with a plan to come after the Supreme Court. He wanted to put limits on the Supreme Court, term limits and other things like

that, which has been a Democrat fantasy not going to happen. Absolutely will not happen. They don't have the votes to do that, and there's not going to be that kind of a seat to give them the votes. But this is virtue signaling to the left wing of his party. And then we saw this how the DNC plans to run out the clock for Biden. This was also coming out at the end of the week last week, but I believe that it was Mark Halpern was right. But their idea was that they

were going to do an early virtual convention. And this has a lot to do with whether or not they can replace the nominee, and we'll talk about that in terms of who's next and how it's going to be done. But one of the reasons they were talking about this was because already, since they had moved there, their conventions so late and then move the debate way to the front. So this is a long term plan. When you look at stuff like this, it's just like looking at the pandemic. You know that

it was planned. Why, because they set this stuff up. You look at the pandemic. They did the first rehearsal of this germ game stuff two months before nine to eleven, two months after nine eleven, then the anthrax attack. They've got the model legislation going out to the states and they practiced it for twenty years. Same thing here, they completely by manipulating the dates and everything, and their convention was so late that they ran a foul of

the law in Ohio that had a deadline. They had to have their deadline in by August the seventh, I think it was, and I think the convention begins August the nineteenth. So the Republican governor Dwine said, well, we'll make accommodations for that. I mean, we don't want to have an election without Republicans and Democrats on the ballot. And yet the Democrats said, well, I don't know if we can trust this Republican governor, so let's

have a virtual convention. So there was already some talk about that. So the Biden camp seized on that and said, yeah, let's do that early convention. If they did the early convention August the seventh, once he was nominated, now it's a whole new ballgame. And so this really was where the fight was. Now the DNC plans to run the clock out for Biden.

This is from Axios. Once Biden receives votes from the majority of nearly four thousand delegates, it'll become exceedingly difficult to remove him from the presidential ticket. The DNC's current plan is to train state party chairs next week. They wrote this last week on how to conduct the electronic voting in a secure way. The window for voting is likely to open on July twenty ninth and conclude by August the fifth, a virtual roll call, and they said for the

eighty one year old Biden, time may finally be on his side. Oh like Mick Jagger, right, Yeah, they're both the same age. Mick Jagger is in a lot better shape than Joe Biden is. Time is on my side. Now. Time is not on any of our sides, folks. It's uh, that is an illusion. It is not on our side. It is not on Biden's side either. And so the uh, that was going to be one of the things that he could do to defeat them.

And so there was a fight over this. The anti Biden Democrats rushed to block the DNC's virtual nomination scheme as a zero head reported and here's the lesson. You see, it's absolutely true that Biden did not want to go, and Jill did not want him to go, and so forth. And this guy is a president, I mean, can't he do it? And he's not only he said running his campaign Biden said, I'm running the world? Is that an illusion he bought into it? Look if Biden, if

the president can't get can't get what he wants out of this. This is why when you vote, you don't get what you think you're going to get. Even if the president is on your side, and time's not on your side. But you may think that the president's on your side. Well, he's not on your side either, But if he were, let's just imagine for a moment that he is and that you coincide on some issue president wants. It really does, just like Biden wanted to stay in the presidency.

He can't pull it off if he can't get the people with money to support him. He can't pull it off if they organize to push back on it. See, this is the way Washington works. So stop about the fantasies of there being some benevolent dictator. And you know that's a really sad thing. How many people want a dictator, both on the left and on the right. There's a poll coming out showing that I don't need a poll to

tell me that you can read the room. These people want Trump to save the world, or Biden or whoever they're going to put in there to save the world. They want a strong, authoritarian president. I do not. I want a weak president. There's not much that the federal government really needs to do, and they are already into too much of our life and they can't do it. You see the problem is what we see with Biden is that not only is time not on his side, but also, like Mick

Jagger said, you can't always get what you want. As a matter of fact, you rarely do, even if you're the president, because it's this vast machine, and it's like, who's really running this thing? Is it? Even people who are running it? I personally don't think so. I think it's one of the reasons why it's so unwilly. They aren't capable delivering for you. They aren't capable delivering for themselves. Right. As I've said many times about Trump, Okay, so he was owned by the deep state?

Was he? Yeah? Okay? So what makes you think he's going to do it differently the second time around? He was owned by Goldman Sachs and the military industrial complex. He was owned by Big Farm and all the rest of the stuff. So who's going to own him this time? Probably some of the same people, plus the people in Silicon Valley, plus people like Musk who by himself giving him one hundred and eighty million dollars. You say it's a big club and you ain't in it, But guess what,

even those who are in it don't run it. Completely. There's another club that is there above and beyond that, and of course, as far as people are concerned, it is the money. And so the mega donors are plotting to change Biden's mind with money. This is what we were saying. This is a recap of all the stuff that was happening. Is everybody was focused on the RNC last week. Will at work, they said, And when you talk about the mega donors that are manipulating Biden, they were able

to push him out. Just consider Musk one hundred and eighty million dollars between now and the end of the election. As I said, that's more than Al Gore and George W. Bush spent combined on everything in two thousand. One man, one man twenty four years later is going to spend more than the two of them combined. Talk about mega donors, talk about MAGA donors as well, and coming up we're going to talk also what does Elon Musk

want from this? What is his agenda? They're dangling money to members of Congress who say the right things, they're withholding money from those who do not. And they do this on every issue that is critical to the agenda. And so right now you look at it and you say, well, you know, are they doing this because they really want Biden to win? Or are they doing this because they want Trump to win. When you look at the different moves that are being made on the chess board, you see the

very best were pawns on their four D chess board. If you want to talk about this being for D chess, nobody's being upfront and candidate and honest with you in Washington with holy money from those who don't do what they want. Even the most reclusive donors were talking to reporters on the record about the

turmoil and the Democrat Party establishment. Tom Strickler, a founder of the Hollywood talent agency w ME, so he recently met in LA with Senator Martin Heinrich, Democratic New Mexico, and he told Heinrich, if you don't publicly call for Biden to step aside, you're not getting a dime from me. Strickler said he had also been planning to give maximum legal amounts in August to each of the seven most vulnerable Democrat Senate candidates, but that as of now he

would not be supporting them because they have not broken with Biden. It's a message that I've in courage my friends to send as well. If you back Biden, you will lose our support over and out. And they do this type of thing with every issue you think your vote matters. And even George

Soros doesn't want to play this foolish game. There's so many of these people out there giving money on people like Elon Musk is going to flood it with one hundred and eighty million dollars and so forth, an advanced auction of stolen goods. That's what an election is. That's what hl Meakin said one hundred years ago, and he's absolutely right. So you think that you're going to get what you want out of Washington. Biden can't get what he wants out

of Washington. And there's a lot of mega downers with a lot of money, and they're telling the senators and the president what to do. That's the takeaway from this. That's important. That's far more important than if it's going to be Obama or Hillary or Gavin or you name it. We can play that guessing game, but this is the takeaway, folks. You don't have a seat at that table, you don't have a voice in this election, and you don't have a vote in this election. Either you've got something of

a say in the local elections. All politics are local. They've been telling you that. Even Elon Musk, who's just kicked down one hundred and eighty million dollars, says local elections are more powerful and more leverage even than the federal elections. Isn't that interesting? But even though he realizes that truth, and he talks about that, because that's what George Soros is doing, so you didn't to pay attention to him. You know what is Elon Musk doing

at the local level? But more importantly, hal convinced? Is he that he's going to get exactly what he wants from Trump and from jd Vance. That's the key thing. I think that one hundred and eighty million dollars is there for jd Vance. Well, we're going to take a quick break and when we come back, we're going to take a look at what is next, but we're also going to take a look at the Republican side as well. Stay with us, we'll be right back. You're listening to the David

Knight Show. Well, before we I've got just a couple more things I want to talk about in terms of this switcheroo that the Democrats are doing right now. But I'd like to ask you all if you will please like the stream wherever you're watching it. I want to remind you about subscribe Star. And I've got some bad news about cash app. They seem to have block dust now, really strange. What's happened. They've they've made a lot of

changes in their terms of service. First, they wanted password to my bank account. They don't. There's no reason they need to have that in order to take the money out. All they need is a bank routing number and an account number. That's what everybody else uses. They don't need the password. It's looked at that and the bank said, you know, well they want your password, they're gonna be able to do everything that. It's like,

yeah, I'm not doing that. And so I set up a separate account that would just be a place that I dumped that open up, opened it up at a different bank, and that type of thing. But then they started playing games in terms of well, if you want the money right away, you wait a week or whatever for it, but if you want it right away, be seventy five dollars what And then I had to I had to accept a donation from someone and create a pen to do that.

It never had to do that before. And then the last straw was Friday or Saturday. I got sent a five dollar contribution and they said this failed contact us. So I contacted them and I said, well, you've had too many transactions. It's like, what, I don't get that many transactions. I went back and looked at it. I had that was I'd had ten transactions for the month of July, and typically they're pretty small, you

know, like that one five dollars, and so I started looking. I haven't been able to find anything in terms there's some limits in terms of how much money you can take out at a given time, depending on if you've given them again your social Security number and all this other kind of stuff. I mean, they're just maniacs are trying to do identity theft here. But you know, if you do that, you can get money out, and the limits are really high with that. Something like seven thousand dollars is limits.

I mean, you know, that's basically not a limit. But I couldn't find anything that talked about a limit on the number of transactions. So I don't know what kind of game they're playing here. When I got canceled off a PayPal and Venmo, they didn't give me any explanation, and I said, I spent an hour or two on the phone with tech support. Finally one guy said, I don't know what's going on. There's no reason given at all. It just says terminated this account immediately. Though. I

don't know what's going on with cash app. But we do have a lot of different places if you'd like to support the program. We are supported primarily by people who want to voluntarily contribute. We do have a new sponsor that I'm going to talk a little bit about, and it's kind of interesting. It's an organization called Patriot b I'll just leave it at that and i'll tell you about them coming up. But I'm always happy to support bees. It's

something that's real and natural. We need real natural things in our life now, and so they do that and support that a number of ways. So we're going to tell you about them coming up on Rumble Stealth. Patriot, thank you for the tip. So, just on the history I've seen, the Republicans are the creation of the dystopian policies. Democrats are the Enforcers' is a WW tag team event, Patriot Act, Model, State Healthcare Act, etc. Yeah, they ran a lot of that stuff. It's depending on

what you're looking at. And when we look at the authoritarian, anti civil liberty stuff, they do get that to go through certain things that they know that their base would oppose, they get the other party to do it, right, because then that means that you're not going to have opposition from you

know, the Democrats, like the authoritarian stuff. If the authoritarian stuff was done the Democrat base, If the authoritarian stuff was done by the Democrats, Republicans say, wait a minute, Wait a minute, I've got my Constitution of my American flag right here, and I can't find that policy on neither one of them, and so they would get really upset and they would oppose it. But when it's done by a Republican, Oh well that's not a problem, not a problem at all. You want to ban gun items by

executive order, Oh that's okay, it's Trump. You want to take the guns to do the new process later, Oh that's okay, it's Trump. So there's certain things like that. If that had been done by Hillary, if the lockdowns had been done by Hillary. The vaccines had been done by Hillary, absolutely not. But you notice how even with it being done by Trump there well, I don't know if you want to get that Trump vaccine

or and that lasted one millisecond after they announced Biden had won. Then they're all for it and they want to force you to get it and the rest of the stuff. But their natural instinct was to love these types of things, and so they get a Republican and to do it. This is what concerns me about Trump. People understand where Biden is coming from, but when

you put a Republican in, they don't understand it. And that's why I said in twenty twenty, I said, Trump's going to do all of the stuff that Biden is going to do, but he's going to do it in a more subtle way. He'll do it behind the scenes with perverse incentives and things like that, whereas Biden will just come out and say, yeah, do it because I say so. That type of thing. And that's all they talk about. If they talk about anything that happened in twenty twenty,

they only talk about the well with a so called pandemic. They only talk about the mandates on rumbles. Sprumford says, honestly believe if voting matter these days, they wouldn't allow it. It's why voting and the term democracy is pushed so hard. The only vote that matters is money. Yeah, that's right. Money talks and it also votes and the politicians of the best return on investment you can get. That's why what the richest man in the world

knows. Elon Musk on rumble m Seller's David. Local elections are heating up for early voting August first. Here in East Tennessee, harrible commercial has been playing against a Senator Nicely, Yeah, caring about that on her phone. I didn't get it, but it was something like, yeah, he once to get free education to illegal aliens and stuff like that. That's not true. What is true is that in Tennessee it is I think you can go to community college for free. But I don't, you know, Senator Nicely

didn't push anything like that through for illegal immigrants. To tell you something about his opponent, you know, misrepresenting his record. Nicely is about as I said. You know, he came up with the idea for the PRIMAG and talked to Thomas Massey and they pushed it. But unfortunately know and and Washington,

We've only got Thomas Massey in Tennessee. We've got a lot of people who were good like sing a nice who Karen just bought this in this is a fire we got it must be nice to be an illegal alien says,

So this is this is a smear tactic. And again, tell you something about the people who are behind this other candidate you know, nicely has I'm sure he's not perfect, but I've never seen a politician who's more closely aligned with my values and who actually comes up with effective strategies and he can be very persuasive with the other people that are there. He's he's got a nice, easy going demeanor, but he is he is very much about your own

choice and that type of thing. I've seen the way he talks to people, So it is interesting and he's and he's very frank about things, and he does it in a very nicely way. He's appropriately named by Biden.

Is battling Nancy Pelosi pressure tactics and gets Hillary Clinton's help. This was on Saturday, before the dropping out of the race on Sunday, and again, as I said, before, Hillary Clinton getting behind him. I guess so she can stab him in the back. President Biden battling behind the scenes campaign led by Nancy Pelosi to abandon his election re election bid Beer's beginning unexpected support from a former rival, Hillary Clinton, as his campaign's cash flow begins to

dry up. Hillary Clinton and her husband Bill Clinton are asking donors to support Biden. Politico and CNN reported Saturday. You believe that, or maybe they're contacting the donors and making some plans on their own. CNN and Politico reported on Saturday that the Clintons have been privately encouraging donors to continue backing Biden's campaign. To CNN, once source said the Clinton's are choosing to be quote deferential

to Biden's decisions and then let other people apply the pressure. Just days before Biden's debate performance, it change the complexion of the campaign. Clinton joined Biden and Obama on stage at the Hollywood fundraiser, the one that you also saw George Clooney with Paul Begala, former Clinton advisor, said on Saturday on CNN, well, there isn't an inch of daylight between President Clinton and President Biden. He's all in for Joe Biden However, these political parties exist to win,

he said. And it's not a family, it's not a religion, it's not a home. And if you want a friend in Washington, you better get a dog. He didn't say that for the other people have. When Democrats believe they won't help you win, they'll cut you loose, he said, and they'll slit your throat as well as not a family except in the mafia. Since Bill and Hillary Clinton stand by Biden. So you see, there's many different places. As high profile Democrats continue to call on Biden

to drop out, he still has a strong backing of the Clintons. According to NBC, Well that didn't last long, did it. Joe Scarborough is another Bellweather because Scarborough and Mika Brazinski had always been in his corner. It was supposedly his favorite news show because they were so sycophantically attached to him, so much so that you had MSNBC took them off the air on the Monday following the Trump rally shooting, concerned about what they might say evidently got them

very angry. But there was also part of it. You know, most of the media was pushing to get Biden out, but there were certain places like MSNBC doing that to Scarborough and threatening Stephanoflis because he gave an off the cuff remark and somebody came up to him on the street they said, well, what do you think about Biden? And he had been the one who had done the interview. Was not a live interview, it was recorded so they could edit it. But he interviewed him and he said I don't think

he can finish four years. And he got called on the carpet, you retract that or we're going to take you off the airs. What everybody said happened. And again this is Stephanoflis, closely director of Communications White House at the Clinton administration and went straight to ABC and has basically been their number one guy since. And so when you look at the people who were behind the news media, seemed like they were not all on board in terms of pushing

Biden out. Biden has, at least by our account, he said,

Joe Biden has been extremely successful president. And I will say though that when you're told by members of Congress that they're losing, that they're going to lose the House or the Senate if he stays on the ticket, when you're told by members of Congress who have seen the polls that you're going to lose swing states, that your numbers are going to go down in swing states and states like Virginia, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Minnesota that are now in place.

At Scarborough, when your top fundraiser over the past five, six, seven, eight years is telling you the money is gone, the donors have all gone away, you know, it's really incumbent on people that are around Joe Biden to step up at this point and help the president and help the man that they love to do the right thing. And when Joe Scarborough says that, oh, you know, the fat lady has sung and it's over, I guess this is not going to end well if it continues to drag

on. He warned, this is his best ally in the media. Joe Scarborough. Look at the events of yesterday, the events of the last three weeks. At some point, you know, I can tell you, Mike, the anger I hear is not at Joe Biden. The anger I hear or at the people that are keeping him in a bubble. It's not his

fault, poor Joe. I'm not angry at Joe. I'm angry at some of these faceless people behind the scenes that are keeping him in and then Mika Brazenski chimes in says, or they have their own interests, Yeah, because you know, it's so rare to find anybody in Washington, d C. That is operating in their own interests. They're so altruistic and patriotic, aren't they. To a man to a woman, they all are. It's just amazing when you see somebody in Washington that is in it just for their own

personal power and wealth. They stick out like a sore thumb, don't they Just the other way around. David Letterman evidently was not in the loop. He was just coming out saying he was going to do a fundraiser for Biden at Martha's vineyard. He's been out of Hollywood for quite some time, and yeah, it's Beard is now and halfway down is just but he was going to come out of retirement and hold a fundraiser for him. Well, they may still do that for some purpose, I don't know, give him a

big send off and a going away party in a golden parachute. But as

Babel and b points out, they pulled off a successful insurrection. The president has fallen, cried Democratic Party elites, joyfully having seized power. Democrat Party elites have worked tirelessly to overthrow the candidate chosen by voters. They worked tirelessly before all this stuff to make sure there wasn't anybody chosen by voters. You

didn't have an election anyway. They kicked people off the ballot. They literally kicked RFK Junior off and these other people that were there, shut down debates, you name it. It took everything we have, but we've been We have deposed the democratically elected candidate of our party, said former President Obama, proudly. Democracy has been saved. And at press time, MSNBC Joe Scarborough had come on TV to explain how some insurrections are actually a good thing.

Biden then drops out, and when he drops out, he doesn't say anything in terms of a reason. They'll do that later. But it truly is unprecedented. As I point out, we've had other people who have, you know, go back to Lyndon Johnson and all the unrest about the Vietnam War and the riots in Chicago and that type of thing. But he left the he said I'm not going to run again. But that was in March.

That was eight months before the election. So you never had any president who any sitting president who has dropped out of the reelection, running this late, this close to the convention. So that part of it is unprecedented, but not unplanned. It was precisely what they planned to do by the dates that they picked for the convention, for the public humiliation of Biden. In the debate, the DNC chair Jamie Harrison, so in the coming days, listen

how cynical this is. The party will undertake a transparent, an orderly process. This process will be governed by established rules. No, they're making all this stuff up as they go along. It truly is. Again, the early debate was a plan. But what I'm saying is, you know, and they've got a plan for how they're going to run this stuff through.

It's just that from the perspective of people who are not in the smoke filled room making these machiavellian plans, you know, it looks like they're reacting to stuff, but they aren't making this stuff up as they go along. And then you have Mike Johnson, who who has responded to this and says, well, I think they've got some legal hurdles in some of these states. This is going to be challenged, it'll be litigated. He says, well,

that's absolute nonsense. They don't have a leg to stand on. And this is you also see Thomas Massey had made the statement, he said, well, think about this. The Democrats and Joe Biden are saying that he's not up to he's not up to campaigning for this, but he can still be the president. And so that has been picked up and repeated by Mike Johnson, It's been picked up and repeated by Jade Vance. If you can't run, you can't serve. Well, we're going to this is always the

plan. When we come back. We're going to take a look at who JD serves and we're going to take a look at the plan for replacement as well when we come back. Stay with us, right back making sense. Comment again, you're listening to the David Night Show. Welcome back. On Rumble Sprumford, thank you very much, he says, God bless you. Dave Well, thank you. I appreciate that. And on rock Fan Dougalug, thank you. I appreciate that tip as well. And on Rocks Irs

machine Gun, thank you. For the tip. Sorry I didn't get into Gallenburg. By the way, that reminds me that on Saturday, rather than doing that because of what happened with CrowdStrike, Goatree contracted me. This is really kind of interesting and it's got a lot of It's affected a lot of things, and CrowdStrike has affected a lot of things, and they have some interesting ties not just to Hillary Clinton, but the World Economic form and so

forth. And so we got Goatree on and recorded an interview on Saturday, and we got it out to a lot of different places on Saturday. But we're going to play that in the third hour the interview with Goatree, we talked about what happened with this crowd strike problem, with the computers going down around the world. But Irs machine Gun says, can you imagine the retirement party that Hunter is going to throw for his daddy, There'll be at least

ten more felonies can play it committed. Yeah, that's that absolutely is true. It's I don't think I would want to be at that party at all. Let's talk a little bit before we go any further with with Biden. Let's talk a little bit about what was going on with the Uh, well,

I actould, let's let's do that. Let's let's wait on that, and let's do talk about what happens next in terms of the process before we get into what happened at the RNC last week. Replacing Biden on the ticket would be unlawful in some states, as I said before, that's what Johnson is saying. But first of all, who cares about laws? Right? The Democrats care? Do their Republicans care about laws? No, And they certainly don't care about election laws. And I've seen this first hand. Nobody

cares about this. They'll simply move the debates, they'll simply make exceptions. As I've said, I've seen many times where there was only a Democrat running, running unopposed by the Republicans, and the Libertarians would comply with the more stringent rules that don't apply to Republicans and don't apply to Democrats, and they would jump through all the hoops and they would get on the ballot. And then the Republicans would come in after the date had passed and said, you

know, we're not on the ballot. You don't really want to have an election without one of the two major parties being on there and the judges always would just wave the rules. Yeah, that's right, we'll forget about the date. Go ahead, come on it. And you think they're not going to do that for the presidential election. You know, these were local elections and other things like that that they did that. So Johnson said on Sunday

that this could lead to legal challenges. He said it would not be possible for some states to switch out Biden for another candidate ahead of the presidential election November. He said, So it'd be wrong, and I think unlawful in accordance to some of these rules, for a handful of people to go in a back room and switch it out because they don't like the candidate any longer.

He said, That's not how this is supposed to work. So I think they would run into some legal impediments and at least a few of these jurisdictions. Well, again, the law never gets in the way of them doing what they want to do, especially when it applies to them. And so MSNBC sets the record straight and Mike Johnson is completely wrong about this. Richard Winger is their source at MSNBC, and he was somebody that again I knew quite a bit. We had quite a bit of interaction with Richard Winger.

Ballot Access News is his website and he has focused on that. So he was the go to guy for everybody who was trying to get on the ballot as a third party or as an independent candidate. The Republicans and Democrats have it given to them. Everybody else has to like crazy and so MSNBC so as to their Democrat readers, stop panicking. Replacing Biden on the ballots

is not a problem. But they do say this. America's ballot access laws, the procedures for how candidates are placed on the ballot in each state, are notoriously difficult compared to other democracies laws. And again, we don't have a democracy. We have republic, but theoretically, but in actuality, what we do have is a democracy. We've got mob rule. They've moved most of the rule of law away and a lot of the representative republic stuff out of the way, and they want to get rid of all of it,

electoral college, you name it, all of it. But it is notoriously difficult. It is designed that way to keep everybody else off. Richard Winger says, the nations, who is the nation's foremost authority on the topic, says that there has long been arbitrary and difficult petition thresholds, discriminatory treatment of

third party and independent candidates. This is why I said, you know, you want to know when the election is rigged, it begins with who even gets on the ballot, who gets in the debates, and that kind of thing. And you can see that again with RFK Junior, with the other

candidates who were running against Biden, the Democrat Party kicked out. Major party candidates also run afoul of the rules on occasions, and just this year, Trump's ballot access was imperiled under the Fourteenth Amendments bar on insurrectionists, before the Supreme Court ruled in his favor. He's not been convicted of insurrection, by the way, so again that doesn't even apply. But so they said, as it currently stands, state Democrat parties wouldn't be replacing Biden at all because

he's not yet the party's official nominee. That's what I referred to earlier when I said they wanted to do it virtual nomination. They wanted to do a virtual nomination to make sure they didn't run a foul of Ohio they didn't trust the Republican governor saying that's all right, we'll keep you on the ballot. So I said, let's do a virtual nomination before our late convention date. And then there became more of an impetus to do it, as there was

a move to replace Biden on the ballot and that was shut down. Winger says calls he calls much of the coverage about this threat gullible. He said, there would be no legal problem in any state to change out the candidate on the ballot. The bottom line is that there's unlikely to be an election law impedimentary replacing Biden, he said, in every state. This is how it works. Both major parties are qualified for what is known as automatic ballot

access. Republicans Democrats automate get on. Everybody else has to go through this task worthy of sissifus rolling the rock up the hill every year and then having it roll back down on them and then having to do it again. It's virtually an impossible task. A Libertarian party got very good at it, but that's all they accomplished. That's why I said, you have to be careful

that you don't get distracted off onto a side issue. They focused so much on ballot access, they didn't never get anybody elected at local level, and so they never really got anything done. There's always just this top down approach. So why I've seen that done worked in and I know how hopeless that top down approach is. It's got to be bottom up or it's not real.

Their nominees Republicans Democrats do not need to gather petition signatures, They don't have to clear any other hurdles to secure a spot on the general election ballot. Instead, the Democrats and Republicans simply tell the state's election authorities who their candidates are. This process is never completed prior to the former formal nomination by the party's national convention. By the same token. You know, when we were in North Carolina, who had worked to get the Libertarian Party on the

ballot, All the candidates were selected in convention. They were selected in the national candidates were selected in national convention. The president should say, and then the state convention would determine who was going to be running for Congress or any state office, and they would just send this over to the state. The problem was getting the party on the ballot. But once the party is on the ballot. It operated just like the Democrats and Republicans. It's like,

here's our list of candidates for these offices, and that's it. It works that way in every state. And so for people to think that this is that there's some kind of an obligation based on these prime mary's, in a sense, that's a suggestion from the voters that they don't have to follow. Like everything else, is a suggestion from the voters that they don't have to follow. The one complication again rises in Ohio, but again that's not going

to be an issue. They will get that changed. Even with a wrinkle in Ohio, there is no potential problem all the state laws that Heritage has had some commenters out there saying, well, you can't do it. You know, Heritage Foundation is absolutely wrong about this stuff. They said that only concerns the process for a party to replace one of its candidates later in the calendar after having previously certified a candidate or the Biden Harris ticket. You see,

that's the big issue. Wants you to put them on put out the state of candidates. You just do it in convention. But if you want to change somebody after you sent it in now it becomes a big deal. That's why they were so careful about the timing of the public humiliation of Biden that we call a debate, and when the convention was going to happen.

It's very calculated. And when you look at these politics and when people don't understand how the political parties work, that's one of the reasons why there was a lot of confusion revolving around the electors and the electoral college and the twenty twenty election. You had a lot of these people who just showed up. And I had friends who were really confused about it, said, well, look, they got Republican electors. They showed up. It's like they're just

there from that particular party. Every part Just like you get a slate of people that are going to run for office, you also turn in a slate

of your electors. Let's say that the state has ten electoral college votes based on its population, them a list of ten names of people who were in your party, and then if your candidate is certified by the state as the winner, then those ten people, not the ten people from the other parties, but those ten people are now the electoral college representatives for that state.

Those are the rules under which they operate, regardless of whether they aligned with the Constitution, and they don't really, but that's the way it operates.

That's why they call them fake electors and things like that. Now, within the party, you can have a situation where in nineteen eighty you had Roger McBride was I think the adopted son of l. Laura Wilder who wrote a Little House on the Prairie or something, and he was a producer of the show Little House on the Prairie, so they had money in Hollywood, and he was a Republican elector and he cast his vote for the Libertarian Party rather

than for Ronald Reagan in nineteen eighty and that was the end of his affiliation with the Republican Party. But that's called an unfaithful elector because they expect these electors, you get people who've been active in the party. You expect them to support the party's nominee. But of course they can do whatever they want. But they controlled that process. And what I said, and it was

the final straw, I guess he got me fired. On that December the fourteenth, all the electors had sent in their votes from each of the different states, and it was done because there was never another slate of electors selected. And I said, if they wanted to send another slate of electors, and of course Pence said it. Jd Vance has now said it. Thomas Massey said it at the same time. He said they didn't get a same

thing to work with. If they would have gone to some of these there were four states that were key, They all had Republican legislators, they all had a raizor thin margin of victory for Biden. And if they would have made the case to those Republican state houses that Trump had won, and if they had believed that, they could have said, well, we're going to

say that the electors are the Republican electors are going to be used. Now that would have been challenged in court, but they would have had a pretty good case. You know, is it the executive branch of the state that gets to pick whop the electors are, because that's what happens with the Board of Elections. It's under the governor or is it the legislature, And so then you could have had something to work with. But nobody did that.

They only challenged it a little bit in the courts. So what is it. How do they replace Biden? Well, the newly unbound delegates and there's three, nine hundred and four of them, will pick the new nominee. They say. These delegates, along with the thirty seven uncommitted delegates and the eight that were won by candidates who dropped out already, can vote for whoever they want to, just like what I was saying in terms of the electors,

And nobody is really truly bound by any of this stuff. It's just kind of your word, your honor, and we know that there's no honor among thieves or politicians in Washington. The virtual roll call again is not going to happen. They had planned it for next week. Then who are the delegates? Well, the super delegates. We've heard a lot about them in twenty sixteen, and it's kind of interesting to see how Semaphore describes this a

Democrat publication. Super delegates got toxic in twenty sixteen when Bernie Sanders made an issue out of them in his primary campaign. It was an issue because he was losing in states that he won the popular vote because the super delegates to do whatever they wanted to the other delegates were allocated based on how people had voted, they allocated them to candidates, and again, you know these are you have people, so you have the electors that go to the Electoral College

and they're supposed to be loyal to the party. Then within the primary, before you're coming up to the convention, you have delegates that are allocated to a particular candidate and they're supposed to be loyal to that candidate up to the convention. That's why always in the past, people if there was a real competition, they would try to get the endorsement of one of these candidates and have him tell his delegates or at least his delegates to another candidate. But

the super delegates were doing their own thing. They were above all this stuff, super right above it. And so Biden not Biden, Bernie Bernie Sanders had several states where he beat Hillary Clinton, but she got more delegates because she schmoothed the party operatives that are known as super delegates. So they will not be voting on the first ballot because it's smacks of insider corruption. So how do they get around this, Well, it's a pretty easy workaround.

If they want, they can have enough candidates on the ballot that nobody wins on the first round, then super delegates come in and make the pick pretty easy. Right, even I can see that if the delegates rejected Laala Harris, the Biden Harris war chest could be donated to the DNC or to a super pack. Follow the money ninety one million dollars and that war chest, and if Harris stays on, if Harris is the candidate, that's at her

disposal. This is another reason besides the fact that she's a cackling Dodo bird, the fact she's got ninety one million dollars in the war chess. That's another reason why they want to push her out of the way, because then that goes into the DNC and these people have control of it. But as long as her name, since her name was part of this ticket, as long as she is on the ticket when Biden is out, then it all

goes to her. So she is the focus of a lot of these people's ire And on Friday there was a there was a conference call and they had Harris doing it. They said it's very sloppy, very unorganized. There was a scolding tone. They were unimpressed and they were insulted, said the donors. Well, it sounds like it's her typical thing. It was a total failure, damaging and poor planning. One person called it ludacrous. Another said

it was mismanaged. It was rushed. It was a Friday call with three hundred heavy hitter donors kicked off reports from field organizers who used their time to vent anger over the intra party battle over whether Biden should remain. Organizers stalled to buy time while everybody waited for Harris to join the call. Twenty minutes after it started. Donors were warned against agitating to replace Biden. And then she came in and as they characterized it, they said they had the bad

cop good cop treatment. So before she comes on, they wait twenty minutes, and for those twenty minutes, they've got some staff there and they're talking to these big hitting donors and warning them, saying it's time to stop the leaks and the rampant rumors. The These are donors who are not used to getting admonished and told what to do, said one of the sources to NBC. Many of the donors went into the call expecting to receive insider insights.

Instead they got a lecture, and then she came out to give them the good cop treatment. So they're first scolded for their lack of faith in Biden. Then they got a pep talk from La La Harris. And of course it's not just the mega donors who are doing that. There's some bad blood within the party about that. Here's occasional cortex, Alexandria occasional cortex talking about how she doesn't like Lalla. She says nobody likes her. And I'm going

to say what a lot of these folks aren't saying. I'm just going to say it. If you think I school election time, isn't there is a census among the people who want Joe Biden to leave that Kamala that they will support Vice President Harris, you would be mistaken. And I'm going to say that because if they're gonna come out and say all their little things on background, off, off the record, but they're not going to be fully honest, I'm gonna be honest for them. I'm in these rooms. I see

what they say in conversations. A lot of them are not just interested in removing the president. They are interested in removing the whole ticket. Yeah, yeah, well, there's she has occasional cortex on rumbole. DGA says that David Trump should be the Democrat nominee. Also, that's the new Republican Party platform with no different fromilaries in twenty sixteen, and the donors and the people that they're supporting are no different. That's the key thing as well. We're

going to get into that. As one person said last week, tell me that I'm a rhino. He said, I'm given a choice of three Democrats, Biden, Trump, or r K Junior, and I'm supposed to pick

from one of them. Where I'm a rhino. Yeah, A twenty eight day path forward for the Democrat Party, says The Hill. And again this is an op ed piece by Zogby, a former governor. Also, David Walters wrote this. He's on the DC, the DNC committee is part of the rules thing. This was published Sunday, just immediately before Biden dropped down. And now they've got a twenty eight day path and now it's very easy. Again, we're talking about the way people are manipulated. This is the

important thing. This is at this point we can see that you know who's running the country, who's running the world. Well, Biden pretends to and that's why one of the people said, we got to get him out of there. People are going to see how you know, the Republican Party and the Democrat Party, they're just putting puppets up there. They're not these guys not actually running everything. And everybody wants to believe that there is some kind

of we've got a benevolent dictator that agrees with them. It's going to fix everything for them. They've got all their hope and their expectation and that dictator, and they think that these guys really have a lot of power. They represent an agenda, and it's important to follow them so as you know the line of attack that's going to be coming at us from one side or the

other. But it's at this level of this game of thrones is really like a high school election because it's the people behind it that are really going to be affecting the policy. A suggested plan twenty eight days forward can only begin if the President announces that he'll not be seeking reelection. He can announce that he is asking the DNC to define the way forward. And again, you know, we've had all of the press attention from the shooting at the rally

through last week at the RNC has all been focused on the Republicans. Now we're going to see as soon as all that was over, soon as the party was over, they start with us. Now we're going to switch everything. And you know they had already planned it, they'd already timed it out. All of it was planned. Each candidate for the presidential nomination would be required to secure the endorsement. This is how they're going to run this.

You've got to get the endorsement of forty sitting DNC members from the approximate four hundred and fifty members. Now this is being put out as a plan. I think it's the more serious plan because it's being put out as an op ed piece on the Hill, the very establishment political paper. It's being put out by people who are currently on the DNC. It's different from the plan that was put out by James Carvill. James Carvel said, well, this

is let Clinton's and Obama picked some people. Yeah, they're the best ones to pick anything that's not going to fly. They we got to make this look like it as a quote unquote democratic process. And so what they're going to say is that they will have They've got to have. Out of the four hundred and fifty people on the DNC, each of these candidates has to have forty endorsements. The forty must include at least seven members from each of

the parties for geographic regions. Now, why they don't say is whether or not a DNC member can endorse more than one person. Such a process will most likely result in no more than five potential nominees. That's why I think

they can only endorse and their idea and their plan only one. These nominating petitions will then be submitted to the Secretary of the DNC for certification no later than ten days after the process is announced, and should include a signed statement pledging to run a positive campaign coupled with an agreement to endorse the winning nominee.

The Democrat National Committee. The DNC will host two televised town halls over a ten day period for the certified candidates to appear together to make their case to the Democrat Convention delegates into the nation. You said they're setting up this reality TV show, this beauty contest, and they have thought through all this stuff. It's a plan, and they're now just now telling you what the plan is going to be. I mean, they didn't sit down at the

kitchen table on Friday night and come up with this thing. And they've been working on this for a while. They're just rolling it out and they're op ed piece. The messaging from these new younger leaders who will oppose Donald Trump, praising Biden's progress and explaining why they are best positioned to continue his progress will be powerful and will no doubt command large TV audiences, just like you know Aul Cogan and the other people that they had there was Amber Rose or

something. You know that's bringing the celebrities to get a TV audience. Well, this is going to be a dramatic thing. As I said, when I was a kid, there used to be a lot of drama at the conventions. They didn't have everything tied up, and there's going to be alliances that were made and you know delegates that were traded off from different candidates. Well, you know, I'm coming in here and I've got a block of

candidates and they're trying to trade it for a cabinet position coming up. In that type of thing, and there was always a lot of suspenseful that's what they're going back to. It will be formally the candidates will be formally nominated, The votes will be cast by the thirty nine hundred electric elected delegates in the first round, and then in subsequent rounds they will bring in another fifteen hundred super delegates. They call them automatic delegates because they don't like the term

super delegate. Same thing, just a different label. So Biden will have made all this possible if this occurs, they said, and they put this out just hours before as an encouragement to Biden. Biden will have made all of this possible. He will be seen as a true national leader who put aside his personal ambition and allowed the Democrats to preserve and build on his legacy. Otherwise, we're going to just make sure he doesn't even get a presidential

library and all the rest of this stuff. And then as people start lining up behind candidates, you have a guy at Pablo o'han o'hannah. I've never heard of this guy. He's from the UK. It pushed to keep them in the EU, the remain people. He was leading the campaign in Ireland to put abortion in that country that had never had it before. And this is the guy who thinks that Americans need to pick Hillary Clinton. I don't think that. I don't know, just be projecting my values in my utter

revulsion of Hillary Clinton and Democrats in general. But I can't I can't see this working. He said. The notion that there's no suitable successor exists, but that's not a good one. But just one of the most qualified people ever to run for office, and that is Hillary Clinton. Clinton is younger than both Biden and Trump. Faint phrase, isn't it, And she's just a shade younger than they are. Her continued advocacy for children's rights and all

the rest of stuff. This is the UN Convention for the Rights of the Child, and this whole idea that takes a village to raise a child, but parents, we want to get rid of them, cut them off. She pushes this kind of un patricide that's a hallmark of everything that she's done. She really wants to destroy the family. And then there's Michelle Obama and again a documentary, The Love of the Road Sent Me done by Gilbert and you know Michelle Obama twenty twenty four. You know, it's different people have

different candidates out there. I think they're all despicable, but we're seeing these kinds of op ed pieces, pushing all of them on the side. It may be one of these lower profile governors who run this time around, because I think they really do want the establishment and the technocracy. I think they really want to have Trump in. I'll tell you why when we come back.

Instead of running against a man who appears to be too old to keep his thoughts together, Trump will have to face off against a younger, more vital opponent, Michelle Obama. Trump and his party brought this on themselves, said this person at Miami Herald. Well, I think it was. You could say they brought it on themselves if they let the DNC pick the debate

dates. But other than that, the debate last month pretty exclusively showed Biden isn't up to what Americans expect, and of course that was by design, So they only have one sure thing, he says. Michelle Obama. Polls show that other possible contenders, including Lalla Harris, runs slightly behind Trump that start out playing ketchup, But in those same polls, Michelle Obama crushes Trump

by eleven points. This is a whole purpose of all this stuff. Bring somebody in where there is no time really to vet them or to define them. I think she'd find it pretty hard to turn down if delegates at the DNC were to draft her. And just to remind you of where Obama is, Life Site News talked about Obama's vision of democracy that threatens our constitutional republic.

And there's two aspects to this and their article. One of them is the idea that keep selling everybody that America is a democracy and not a republic. As a matter of fact, even James Carvel's what's matter with those people out there that I think it's a republic? God, they know you, and it's like, well, maybe they've read the Constitution. On the fourth of July this year, Obama started putting himself back in the spotlight, which

I'm wand to be interesting. He's been pretty quiet since he left, but then he comes out to write a not bad piece and he says a key difference between the democracy republic lies in the limits placed on government by the law. And so that truly is the case. You see, he doesn't like that when we look at what happened with Warp Speed, we wound up with a government that didn't put itself subject itself to the law. They just did whatever they wanted to whatever they could get away with, and so it is

mob rule. Obama has said, and I've talked about this many times, the idea that the Constitution, he knows, is a charter of negative liberties. That's his label because he doesn't like what the Constitution does. They're not negative liberties. They're individual liberties. And there's nothing negative about prohibiting the government

from stomping on your face. That's a positive thing. But he calls it negative because he's he's looking at this from the standpoint that he wants unfettered government. If they want to stomp on your face, so be it. So he wants unfettered government, so he thinks anything that stops that is negative, it's bad. He said, the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties.

It says what the states can't do to you, says what the federal government can't do to you, But it doesn't say what the state or federal government must do on your behalf. That is socialism, communism. He calls that positive. So I need to have something in the constitution says I have a right to being fed, housed, clothed, educated, this or that right, every one of these things, every component of the welfare state he once

mandated in the Constitution. The problem for him is that the Constitution prohibits those things, but he and the Republicans have made sure that they don't follow the Constitution, even though it is the basis of their authority to govern. And that goes back to an interview radio interview they had in two thousand and one, and as part of that where he was defining and labeling are god given liberties that we prohibit government from approaching those god given liberties. The Bill Rights

doesn't give us those liberties. What it does is it prohibits the government from stomping on the things that we have that every human being has. So he called that negative, and in that he said that the Constitution is flawed, that was his term, and that America must, in his words, break free of the Constitution. In other words, we don't want to have a fixed document, a written law. It needs to be something that is malleable. They call that a living constitution, and that's how they usher in the

Marxism. So on rumble Owens Owen sixty one says Trump Harris twenty four. Well, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back. We're going to take a look at how we could do Trump and Hillary on the same ticket. They would be quite comfortable with each other. So we'll be right back defending the American dream. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Let's take a look at the people who rule us. Here. This is a great clip from AI. They've got the number. Here's she

wearing his Queen of the Pooh pajamas and Trudeau in his dress. Oh there's Clinton, Bill Clinton and the blue dress and red shoes. You got a brand new ki. I think the way should get together and chi you see. I'll describe this to the people who are listening in the audio here. Yeah, that's something that was put together on AI. I didn't do with somebody on Twitter. Debt and we take a look at these ways. It's really pretty funny what they did with it. They put putin in because he's

opposed LGBT. They put him an address, a rainbow colored dress that is there. And then they got the next one here is Biden, which I thought was particularly done well. They got him there with his aviator shades and he's got camo, but he's you know, wartime present. But he's sitting in a wheelchair. And then they have Trump, who is in an orange suit, like a prison suit, and on his chest it's got v L,

which is Roman numerals for forty. And I think it's also interesting because even though he's got chains, he's holding the chains at least one of his hands there, so it's kind of like he's broken free of that. Then

we have Nancy Pelosi, famous for being an insider stock trader. She's got an outfit there that, as I've said many times, these politicians need to be required to wear their sponsors as if they were NASCAR drivers, and so they're all over her dress, all these different corporations they give her money, and then a big emblazoned on her chest there says New York Stock Exchange and

Nvidia symbols for them with dollar signs. Then you have President she and his Winnie the Pooh pajamas and carrying a Winnie the Pooh handbag there, because that was something that really got under his skin when I had a picture of him walking next to Obama, who is tall and thin, much taller and thinner than she is, and people put up a cartoon showing Tigger next to president. She in the same orientation he banned the Communist Party, banned way to

Pooh everywhere. It's all about egos. It's all about egos and the party. Then we have Trudeau in a dress that is the Canadian maple leaf all over it, and of course, again referring to his gender fluidity. I guess we could say, then Hillary Clinton, and she's got a pants suit that says supreme all over it. I guess I'm not really sure what that

reference is. Maybe some of you understand that. But one of the best ones of these then is Bill Clinton walking down the runway and that blue dress from that painting, and the blue dress and the red shoes, remember that painting that was in Jeffrey Epstein's New York manor. Or we should say layer. Maybe that's a better way to describe that thing, a layer. And so they've got him walking down the aisle, blue dress and red shoes.

Then we have Lala hyper sexualized here because we know that's how she got her position, so to speak. And then we have the technocrats. They put Zuckerberg in. As he's in there, he's transforming into a lizard. You have Tim Cook again in a dress with a purse, but then around his neck is hung a Mac laptop. And finally we have closing it out.

We have Bill Gates who walks down the runway and then as he gets to the end of the runway, the thing that he's carrying turns into the blue screen of Death, which goes back to what we're going to be talking about with Goat Tree coming up in the next hour. I got a couple of comments here. Jason Barker on rock Fan, thank you for the tip. He said, David, you should promote the merchandise. I haven't seen you do that in a while. You're absolutely right. I'm really bad at sales,

really really bad. I will do that in a moment here. I am going to promote the b people Patriot be best here in a moment. And on rumble mad mem thank you for the tip. God bless. How soon will you be having doctor Shiva back on? Which platform? Well? I answer that two different questions. Yeah, we'll have him back on pretty soon. I think his message is good because what he does is he focuses on people who are focusing on the presidency. And that's what I've been doing

for the first half of the show. If you're focused on the presidency and you're watching this news and you're kind of curious about what it is, and you're drawn into this high school type election, you need to understand that there's things that you can do at the personal level. And that's really the message of doctor Shiva, if I could condense it down, It's like to get out of this control system, understand how they are controlling you, and understand

that there are concrete things that you can do. And that is I think the real reason to cover the presidential politics. It should be covered for that, and it should be covered to get people out of that box that they put themselves in. And he's doing that with a presidential campaign, So we will have him back on which platform gives you the biggest portion of tips and money from I would say that is a subscribe Star, but it is.

We've got a lot of people who have moved over to Zell because Zelle has no fees, and right now that's just a clear straight shot through. There's no fees, no taxes for anybody on that. But subscribe Star is a reliable one because if somebody sets that up, well, if their card expires, subscribe Star doesn't tell them. I've had that happen over and over again people have told me, so that's a bit of a problem. But other than that, you know, somebody just determines how much they want to do

on a regular basis, and so that is helpful. You have to don't have to make a special effort each month. But we are getting a lot of people on zel and of course it's as I said, we're having problems with cash app. I've had too many people. You know, here we are the third week of the month and we've had ten people ten donations, and that's too many. They say. I just maybe that's a new rule or something that's never applied in the past. But let's see what happens going

forward. Travis said, don't just tell people where they can't contribute to them where they can't contribute. So if you want to know where you can contribute, go to the Davidnightshow dot com. It tells you where you can watch the show, and then it also tells you where you can support us as well. And I would have to say that, you know, besides a subscribe star for the podcast, we have a lot of people who listen audio basis and for people who support us on subscribe Star, we give them a

link to the show that doesn't have any commercials in it. But the commercials, I have to say, is the same, maybe even a little bit more than subscribe Star the commercials on the audio podcast stuff. Also on subscribe star you get a list of links to all the articles we covered during the week. Yeah, that's right. That's another thing we do on subscribe Star. So just started doing that recently. Yes, thank you Travis for doing

that. Travis took the initiative to that. We had somebody who asked about that and he took the initiative to do that. So we put that out and we put the description of links, and we put a link to an audio podcast that does not have commercials. Of course, the videos don't have commercials on them, and we just trust people to contribute if they want to

keep the show on the air. But again, you can find all the links to these places as well as where you can support us in subscribe star on zeal uh and we've got a mailing address that you can actually send things to, so that works really well as well, and you can find all that at the Davidnightshow dot com. Well, as we saw the runway there. You know, it really is a celebrity show. And we saw this

when we looked at the RNC. We had Hulk Hogan out there, uh, ripping his shirt off, and I just you've probably seen this at this point in time, but it was just such an astonishing thing. I had to play it. I mean, this is really what politics has become. It really has become professional wrestling. Happened last week when they took a shot at my hero and they tried to kill the next president of the United States. Enough you want to fight, you got one, right, I heard

somebody else say that again, right again. It's professional wrestling, isn't It absolutely is, even at the even at the shooting. You know, fight, fight, fight, that type of thing. The greatest tag team of my life, he said, Trump and Vance. I think the greatest tag team of my life has been seeing the tag team of Trump and Biden. They just like wrestling. They have fake heroes and fake heels. He's going to straighten the country out for real Americans. Yeah, that's right, just

trust him. Uh, he's not going to rip you off, it says the man who ripped off his shirt, And we're all glad that it wasn't our ip for Trump, but he said, we've never had it. This is what he said before that or after that, We never had it better than the Trump years. Really yeah, I I loved that lockdown, the masks, the six foot distances, all of these superstitions that they push down on us. By the way, we now have doctor Michael Yaydon talking about

superstitions. I've been saying, I've picked this up from a lot of doctors. And now Michael Jayden, who was a vice president at Pfizer creating this stuff, he's now come out and said there wasn't a COVID pandemic, and he says, and I don't think viruses exist. I think that's a model that doesn't reflect the reality that's going out there. I've seen that from a

lot of people, and I've mentioned it many times. You know, we had models of the universe, you know, intellectual abstractions to try to help them understand and predict, but things that they can't really observe or test directly. And so when we're talking about things that are far away or things that are microscopic sub microscopic, they can't really observe these things so they come up with abstractions about how nuclear physics works. And now with quantum physics everything changed.

So we had Newton had some models that worked very well, and we had a lot of created calculus, and he had calculus equations for the physical world that we could observe and measure that worked really well. When they started going to the atomic level, sub atomic level, we had a model that's put out by Nils Borr. Now they moved on from that, and from

what Einstein has talked about, they've moved on to quantum physics. And quantum physics operates very differently, and so we have these abstractions out there, and quite frankly, I think the virus abstraction I agree with Michael Yaden. I think it is overblown. I don't think it is accurate. But we'll talk more about that later. Getting back to the politics stuff, we never had it better than the Trump years just just cherished the memory of lockdowns and six

foot social distancing and mass. Wasn't that a wonderful time when you were non essential, when the constitution was non essential, could all be suspended? And they want to bring that all back. He said, we had a thriving economy. Well that was BC before COVID, or maybe we say BS before speed before warp speed. Right, Yeah, we had a thriving economy. I mean we had this debt bubble. They were just pouring money in with

a repo market in twenty nineteen. The quantitative easing and the putting money into that and everything. It just pump pump, pump, pump pump. Boy. You know, it was really great when we were all doing those drugs on Friday night. It's on Saturday when the hangover comes in that it was a problem. Right. Anyway, he said we had strong borders. Did we? Did we? I remember caravans coming in and I don't know if we had strong borders. What happened as soon as Trump left, everybody starts

coming in. And it really wasn't anything that Trump did. It was his COVID rules that he started to put in place. I mean, he wants to come into a country that's crazy. Anyway. With the COVID rules, we had safe streets, you know, like that summer, the summer twenty twenty where BLM was riding everywhere. We had safe streets, said haul Cogan. But then we lost it all in the blink of an eye, just in the blink of a lie is really what we're talking about here. So

he rips his shirt off. It's a performance, but people love that. You know. That's the same kind of shtick that Alex does, you know, screaming and yelling and ripping stuff up and temper tantrums on here. It's professional wrestling. It gets people to watch that. On Brownstone a historical view of today's political theater, pointing out that public debates quote unquote between candidates were not very common thing. I mean, they had the Lincoln Douglas debate.

That was a pretty rare thing. Wasn't in modern times that we had the televised debate between Richard Nixon and JFK. Interestingly enough, the people who listened to that debate on radio believed that Nixon had won. The people who watched it on TV believe that JFK won because he's more younger, more photogenic. Nixon had a five o'clock shadow or whatever. They didn't like that at the

time, so it was based on physical appearance. And then after that there wasn't another one until nineteen seventy six, the presidential election between Jimmy Carter and the incumbent Gerald Ford, who did it because he was in a weak position. By nineteen eighty seven, the Commission on Presidential Debates was formed by the chairman of both Democrat and Republican parties. This year, he says, neither candidate agreed to a debate that was sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Bates.

They skipped over something as significant, and that was in the nineties when you had this Presidential Commission let's put together by the two main parties, and they had a set of rules, and Ross Bureau was able to qualify for those rules. They changed it after that to try to make sure that would never happen again. And then eventually the way they did was they abandoned Even before

that, you had the League of Women Voters and stuff. So they abandoned that to give the Republican Party and the Democrat Party control over the debate process. And then they wound up getting rid of the Commission. And so now they're just going to the two candidates to see if they wanted to debate, and they don't because even with that kind of control, the debates aren't safe enough for them and they can be used as the Democrats used it against Biden.

Third party candidates like RFK Junior have arbitrarily high restrictions placed on their participation. And of course, doctor Shiva, can you imagine a debate where you actually had some issues being discussed. Can't have that. The result this year is the earliest presidential debate in the history of the series, and again it was for a purpose. The nomination process consists of an interesting mix of pledged,

unpledged, and super delegates. There's no rule mandating that any of the delegates, even the pledge ones, have to vote for the candidate to which they are pledged. As I pointed out last section, the expanded vote by mail and early voting procedures implemented in the aftermath of the pandemic. No, it was put in by Trump. It was put in when there was no pandemic. Again, you had in the end of January, Trump's big pharma executive that he put in charge of the NHS declared an emergency. There was

no emergency. There was no epidemic anywhere, let alone a global pandemic, meaning an epidemic all over the place. There wasn't an epidemic anywhere, certainly not in China. We had a handful of people in a country's several billion, not a pandemic by any definition of the war. But they did things

like a vote by mail. The official record, he says, is that Biden won the most votes received by any presidential candidate in US history, seven million, more than Trump won by in twenty twenty, ten million more than Barack Obama one in two thousand and eight. I remember that in twenty twenty Biden largely did not campaign, allegedly due to the ongoing COVID pandemic. Again, a very unusual election in twenty twenty, another very unusual election in twenty

twenty four. Because they've got to pull the strings to fixate. They know that the institutions are going to be changed, just part of this fourth turning. They want to be the ones who rewrite the institutions. It's just that simple. That's why they're playing these games and everybody so and you know, I can't get people to wake up. Nobody wants to look at this. They're all focused on this person or that person. They hyper personalize it.

They take the bait. They believe everything these people are telling them. And the wake of the twenty twenty election. The inauguration was held in a city that was encamped by troops, twenty five thousand troops deployed to the city at the time. You know, I also thinking about just a couple of months before that, when they kicked off Stop the Steal. It had Steve A. Chennant going on with Owen Schroyert and Foe Wars telling everybody two days after

the election already Trump had set this thing up. It was a sting. He printed the ballots, No he didn't. The ballots are printed at each state level. But he lied and he said that Trump had printed the ballots. They'd put these things out, they had them watermarked, and they had a blockchain connection with it and quantum computings. All that was just total bs,

just using a bunch of buzzwords. But the key thing was to say that they had twenty thousand National Guard troops out there rounding up the people in every state that had rigged this election against Trump, a total lie, just like Steve Bannon had said on October thirty first, before the election, he told those Chinese people that were getting fleeced by him and by Glow, he said, heyah, when the election comes, it doesn't matter what happens.

We're going to say we won, and we're going to say we won that type of thing. And then of course they put the people out there saying, well, you know, it's a plot. We had that general who said, yeah, there was white hats and black hats who were fighting in Germany at the place where they the computer center where they were rigging the election.

Lie after lie after lie. We were told by people who were part of the military industrial complex to create the narrative for January the sixth, to fleece people, just like Bannon was fleecing these Chinese followers of his end gloes, to fleece the people who supported Trump, to put them in danger, to tell them that there were twenty thousand troops out there resting people when they're going to send them into Washington, d c. Where there were twenty five

thousand troops that were there, only five thousand were stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Think about that, five times a number of troops they had an Iraq and Afghanistan. And of course they kind of stand back and let some people get violent, and they came after everybody, and only that, but they came after everybody who had a conservative ideology. Guilt by association, guilt by

ideology. It was a setup. By March twenty twenty twenty three, eight hundred National Guard members remained in What he means is twenty twenty one remained in the city with plans to stay for two more months. And he says, think about this. In the Civil War, even after seven states has seceded, Lincoln, whose elections split a divided country, did not even need that

level of security for his first inauguration. Troops didn't show up in to Washington until a year after his election, even after states had seceded, because he hadn't started a war with anybody yet. Trump says he knows nothing about the seriously extreme Project twenty twenty five. That's his words, seriously extreme. You see, he's distanced himself from the largest conservative think tank that's out, their

Heritage Foundation. We say that there's a choice between multiple Democrats on the ballot. You know RFK Junior, If you include him, we've got three Democrats you can choose from. That's not an exaggeration. Trump is a New York City Democrat. He's always been with the Democrats, and it wasn't simply because he lived in New York. He partied with a Clindency, partied with Jeffrey Epstein. He's not just a Democrat, he's a pedophile Democrat. He's a

thoroughly debauched Democrat. And he's calling people that are looking when you look at these policies like Project twenty twenty five, these are basically policies that go back to the Republican Party of the nineteen eighty nineteen eighties. I don't like it because it doesn't address what the real existential issues are today, things like what happened in twenty twenty with the so called pandemic for the public health dictatorship that

they've established. It doesn't address that. It's looking at the problems that we had forty years ago. But it's not a radical and extreme document, as Trump is calling it, unless, like Trump, you are a radical, extreme Democrat. And I think we're going to see that in the second term. I've said it over and over again that in the second term you see most of these Republican presidents moving way to the left, way to the left, and he's already doing it. He said that the rally that he had,

he said, like some on the right. The severe right came up with this Project twenty five. I don't even know some of them. I know who they are, but they're very, very conservative. He said. They're sort of the opposite of the radical left. You have the radical left and you got the radical right, and they come up. I don't know what the eighth sho it is. It's Project twenty five. He's involved in the project. And then they read it some of the things and they are

extreme. They're seriously extreme. But I don't know anything about it, and I don't want to know anything about it. I know nothing. I know nothing. Yeah, Corporal Schultz again, he is a Democrat, establishment Democrat guy, Project twenty twenty five. And this is the headline from the leftist Independent in the UK. Trump says he knows nothing about the seriously extreme Project twenty twenty five, but it mirrors many of his proposed policies. They said.

The document includes plans to expand his executive authority to replace civil servants with loyalists, to crush, as they put it, abortion rights. It's pro life. That's awful, isn't it. To attack civil rights for LGBT know, to stop them from grooming and molesting and mutilating children to impose an anti immigrant agenda. It's an anti illegal immigrant agenda, among other policies. And so I would support all of this as characterized, except for their language.

But we talk about expanding executive authority. That's where the that's what's different than forty years ago, because now the right wants a dictator in Washington. They want an authority Harry and dictator in Washington, just like the left has always wanted. That's why I say the Republican Party has become the Democrats of my youth. They've got a Democrat now that they're all cheering, and the Democrats have become full on Marxists, full on. But jd. Vance is a

technocrat. He's supported by the technocrats in Silicon Valley. We're going to talk about that. That's a different thing. It's also very dangerous. The plan would give Trump unprecedented executive authority over the federal government, that says the Independent. While Trump claims to know nothing about the plan, he praised the Heritage Foundation and their quote plans for exactly what our movement will do unquote. He

said that two years ago, in twenty twenty two. You know, and again I've said in the past, I'm not a big fan of the Heritage Foundation. When there was the massive banning at info Wars in twenty eighteen just before the midterms, and then in October they banned eight hundred sites after they banned in for Wars, and nobody did anything about it. Trump didn't do anything about it as president, nothing about it, did not defend the First

Amendment. They all said, well, this is coming from the corporations, and it was the Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute that sold that idea. Well, it's they're doing what they want to do. No, we knew that it was coming from the Democrats, and there's plenty of evidence at the time. There's more evidence now with the Twitter documents to show the smoking gun.

But for the longest time, they maintained that the corporations could shut you down to the digital public square, even if they were not being prodded and bribed and blackmailed by the federal government to do the censorship. Even if that were the case, you already had Supreme Court decisions saying that if the public square is privately owned, that you can't sense the public speech there. Because in nineteen forty six people understood that rights come from God, that corporations come

from government. Corporations exist because of government granted privileges. That's why they're easily blackmailed or bribed, because their very existence is at the pleasure of government. Not so with our rights. No corporation has the right to take away your free speech in the public square. I mean, if you want to set up a soapbox in the middle of the mall, which is a retail space, no, that's a different thing. But we're talking about the public square,

and these places are the digital public square. But anyway, you know, that was these people were were celebrated by him in the Rose Garden in twenty eighteen when he was present, and then in twenty twenty two he said he liked their plans. He said, Heritage does such an incredible job. This is a great group. They're going to lay the groundwork, the detailed plans for exactly what our movement will do and what your movement will do when

the American people give us a colossal mandate to save America. And he said that in twenty twenty two. Now he says they're extreme. They're extreme because he got a little bit of criticism for it. He is not going to stick to any issue. He's not going to stick to any principle because he has no principles and he has no issues except to get himself in office. And if somebody's going to criticize him for something, he will sell them out, just like he sold out gun rights when he was in office. Oh

yeah, Fortunately, I can do something about that. I don't knowed you guys to ban bump stocks. I could do that by executive order. Where do you get that idea? He also claims that the plan is extreme, but the document mirrors several policies that he himself has endorsed. Folks, if

you believe that this is for DHS, you're nothing. But upon then we have what is the real agenda behind Trump? That's what I want to talk about. But let me get to some of these comments here on Rumble twelve June seventeen seventy six. Thank you for the tip, he writes, Liberate captured three branches of the US government in enjoying the show. Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that. ACSAB not sure how I'd even pronounce that. Thank you for the tip, he says, Thanks for making the

world so much better. Well, I wish I could. I just want to tell people how they can make the world better by focusing on their life and their family and their relationship with God and things like that. It's not going to be fixed in Washington. I'm really going to lay this out. What the threat is. That is this new threat that has now come up on Rock fand Jason Barker. He says, I broke down the fake narrative of the great Trump economy. Yeah. Good. He did not do well

for the average person, yet the supporters tout his economy. Well that's good. Yeah, Jason Barker, Knights of the Storm, the Fox Whole Report, and you know, and when we look at that's the the average person right your your kitchen economics that he broke down. But then when you look

at it at the macroeconomic level. David Stockton wrote an entire book about it, had him interviewed him, and he talked about how bad UH Trump's war on capitalism is what he called it, and what he was focusing on primarily was the massive increase in debt. Now that that has UH is going to have ever increasing repercussions for each of us at the kitchen table. But it

has a you know this, this sort of damoicles. It is hanging over all of our heads and hanging over the entire country, that massive debt that he built up on rumble. Another tip from A. C. S. A B. Thank you very much. Seriously, think I'd be insane if the show wasn't around, Well, thank you. I don't want to drive anybody insane. Let's let's try to find our sane point. Everybody's got a laugh in place, a place so they can go haha. As they said

it Splash Mountain before the ESG people purchased them out. We had a great time there. We always think about that. Travis is nine as that when the boys are little, we had a time show we swapped out at Disney and it was an off season. We knew enough about the place to know to go in September at the time, right after school had started. At the time, they were their little kids that were maybe about ten years old, and they had a thing called the E Ticket Express where they opened up

the Big Ride which used to be the E Tickets. When they first open up, you can walk in, you just pay for When Disney World first opened up and we were only we were just under an hour away where I lived, and you could go Disney World just pay for parking, You just walk through the park. If you want to ride the rides, you could buy a book of tickets, and if you didn't use those tickets that day, you could use them next time you came. It was really relaxed,

nice. But anyway, the e ticket was the thing for the big rides, you know, like Space Mountain or something like that. And so in each one of these areas they had that premiere ride was open and we just went around and around and around on Splash Mountain, had a great time. That was a lot of fun. The kids kids already liked that at the age that they were so always think about the laughing place. You got to

find that laughing place now more than ever. On Rock Fan had, a Seian girl says, it's amazing to me that after the Steve A. Chennik lies about troops arresting people who interfered with a twenty twenty election, people continue to watch Alex Jones, who pushed those lines. Yeah, it's amazing to me too, you know, I every time I talk about I get criticized. Oh, you're a bitter old man. Any thing. I'm not bitter. I'm I'm very blessed that God has provided for us one way or the

other. And I had just had somebody, you know, really the former donor now former listener now really angry about the truth that I told about Alex. I said, look, you know, I treated him as I would a Christian brother, went to him privately, and I said to him, and I've got the recording and I'll play it before you. One day, I said to him, you know that this is not true. You know that this stuff. But Chenneka, this is Thursday, after the election.

On Tuesday, I said, you know this is not true. You know it's going to be found out to be a lie. And I said, if you found out to be a liar, nobody's going to believe you anymore. Well, I was wrong about that, wasn't I? And he didn't do anything about it. Oh, he can get away with lying over and over again to people and there's no repercussions. Just as you pointed out,

you would think, wouldn't you. I Mean, if I'm kind of good to somebody for political advice, I would think that I want to make sure that they're at least trying to tell the truth. Right, anybody can be wrong. But if you're not even trying to tell the truth, if you're deliberately deceiving people, why would anybody pay attention to that. It's just the Hulkogan thing. I think, you know, I couldn't do that if I tried. I'm not not a professional rustler on rumble DGA, David, have

you ever thought of having Flynn, Paula White or Julie Green on? No? No, I would not give them an audience. And I'm you know, I don't like it when you have somebody come, you bring somebody on and you have a debate. I mean, if we wanted to have if we want to have a debate and we had a third party or something, I would do that. But I would not want to bring them on as a host and then do some kind of an ambush or even if they knew that I was oppositional to them, I don't think they'd come on. I

mean it's like RFK Junior. You know, if they know that you're not on board of them, they won't come on. So no, But I say that's the other thing about it. It's like you know, when you look at the spiritual issues here, the real deception. And you know, some people talked about a prayer that was held there that again it was a person who was a contributor. She was a Sikh person. She could have

been given acknowledgment for that contribution. But then to lead these people in a prayer to the One True God, she said, and I don't forget what pagan demon it was, but that she was praying to and got people to bow their heads. You see, Flynn does the same thing. He leads people and plagiarized prayers from a theosophist. Look up theosophy if you don't know

Elizabeth Claire prophet, and he plagiarized a prayer from them. And they have these reawakened tour meetings in church buildings and he's up there, well let's have a prayer, and he starts doing this thing to our sended Masters and our seven Rays and all this other kind of nonsense. And he's got people in

this church building who are bowing their heads and repeating after him. I mean, it's even worse than what happened at the rn C. You know, people were not repeating after me like they repeat after Flynn, It's like, why does nobody have a problem with that? You know, you talk about the paganization of the RNC. Isn't that the reawakened tour on what Flynn is

doing? And again to know that Flynn was one of the first people pushing this trainy stuff, you know, and pushing it on that Navy seal Chris Beck, who now said, I can't believe they did this to me. I'm a grown man, I'm a Navy seal and they gas lit me with a psyop to do what he did. But let's talk about the real agenda that is there. I'm not going to take a break because I wanted to make sure I get to this before we need to roll to our interview with

Goat Tree about crowdsource. The real issue here, folks, is the technocracy and the fact these people have jumped in big time behind jd Vance jd Vance, as I talked about last week, and I talked about I covered Whitney Webb's got a great article talking about Pallanteer and some of these other things. But I've been covering Palleteer for a decade. But everybody needs to be reminded

of the fact of what the technocracy wants to do. Technocracy wants to set up a complete control grid, a surveillance state that includes things like geospatial intelligence run through Pallenteer and organizations like that. It's part of the military industrial complex, to create a police surveillance state, to create CBDC, to create universal basic income. And these people are all about there's much about UBI as they are AI, and they see the two things connected because they're going to take

away your job with AI. They want to give you UBI. And from this standpoint, Elon Musk and the rest of these people are no different from Michael Bloomberg, who when he was running for president in twenty twenty, remember he ran for president then he said, you know, we're going to get rid of these stupid farmers and so forth, and everybody. You can't criticize the farmers. He was talking. He said the farmers were replaced by the

workers and the factories. And now he says, those of us who are smart are going to be replacing everybody's jobs, and we need to come up with a way to keep them pacified so they don't come after us with guillotines. That's what he was talking about universal basic income, and he was talking about going from an agrarian society to an industrial society and now going from an

industrial society to this technocracy that they envision. And if you go back to twenty twenty, also Andrew Yang, who when he began his campaign, it was about universal basic income. It was solely about universal basic income. As a matter of fact, the person said, y'augh to have Flynn these other people on. I invited Andrew Yang to come on, and he accepted, you know, just like RFK Junior, and both of them canceled right before the show when they figured out what the show was about. And so you

know, that's one of the reasons I don't do it. I don't have the time to waste to try to set up these things and all that kind of stuff. Just have somebody canceled because they don't want to be opposed. And I was going to oppose Andrew Yang on universal basic income. I had been talking about it for quite some time at that point, but Elon Musk supported him. I don't think he gave him money. I thought he gave him money, but when I looked up to see how much money he gave

him, they said that he didn't give him any money. And I guess it's because Elon Musk is not stupid. He's only going to give money to politicians who were going to give him something in return when they get elected. And that's why he's this guy who's not contributed to political campaigns. He's giving Trump one hundred and eighty million dollars. What do you think he thinks he's

going to get out of Trump? He's not throwing money away. You know, these people, these billionaires are pretty tight fisted with their money, even Trump. When you look at it, the poor fireman's family, who the guy, the poor guy that got shot and killed. Trump set up a GoFundMe. Trump didn't give him money. He set up a gofundmet At the convention. He read a letter and he goes, here's a guy who did a donation. He gave a million dollars. Trump didn't give a million dollars.

Other people did. Trump's not going to part with his money. Elon Musk isn't going to part with his money unless he thinks he's going to get something out of it. What do you think he thinks he's going to get for one hundred and eighty million dollars. And here's what Musk says about universal basic income, what to do about mass unemployment. This is going to be a mass of social challenge, and I think ultimately we will have to have

some kind of universal basic income. I don't think we're going to have a choice. Niver said basic university basically income. I think it's going to be necessary. So to mean that unemployed people will be paid across the loom. Yeah, because there is no job machine robot is taking over. There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. Okay, well

that's it. You see, they've used this all along. We're going to take the smart ones of us, like Michael Bloomberg, like Elon muss like all these people in Silicon Valley. They're smarter than you and I. They these elitists see themselves as a technocracy. Elon Musk's grandfather, Joshua Haldane, was kicked out of Canada. They brought charges up against him. They didn't get a conviction, so he left and went to South Africa because he tried

to replace the Canadian government with a technocracy. And that was back in the nineteen thirties when HG. Wells was writing The Shape of Things to Come, and then they did the movie Things to Come, and you had all these people like HG. Well's all this Huxley and Huxley's brother Julian coined the term

transhumanism. They're transhumanists. They believe in the singularity. They're atheists who believe they're going to become gods, that they are going to merge with machines and live forever, that they are smarter than us, they will rule us with their robots. Folks, this is one of the most dangerous philosophies that's come

along in a long time. It is purely satanic. And don't get fooled by the conservative things that they might say from time to time, or by the idea that Elon Musk says, we need more people, you know, colonize space and all this kind of stuff. It's the kind of stuff that's right up alex Is Ali and he used to always talk about that. But you know, it's the don't get fooled by that. That's not conservative, it's not Christian, it's not Western civilization. It is anathetical to all of

those things. Person said, look if Musk is spending this kind of money, He's not altruistic. If he's spending the money. He's looking at this as an investment. And I'll say that about Twitter. All these people, Oh, he spent forty billion dollars to save free speech. No, he's

got designs for X. He's got designs for the data that's there. As a matter of fact, the people who reposted him talking about universal basic income said the data about people is the most important thing, and they're pushing. They think that's a good thing, that that surveillance state is a good thing. No. He that's the most amazing thing about his purchase of Twitter is

that people think that it's altruistic. It's not. He wants to know when he merged with PayPal, When he merged with Peter Thiel, they're two companies and they created PayPal. He had already something that was called X. He wants to make it like we I think as we chatter something in China where it's an all social media payment platform and all the rest of this stuff.

Plus having access, unfiltered access to what everybody is saying. He has talked about social media's being the hive mind, as Twitter or X being the hive mind. He's not altruistic. Don't misread his motives here. His full throated endorsement of Trump completes his transformation from tech mogul to Internet poster to red pilled Twitter owner to Republican mega donor. Yeah, it's an investment for him,

And here's somebody else that it's an investment for Larry Fink. Trump has aligned himself with yet another active player in the crypto industry, Larry Fink, founder of black Rock. You know the company that has seventeen and a half billion dollars worth of bitcoins. This is a crypto site and they're very excited about this. Says that Larry Fink and Trump share a mutual respect that has grown over the years that he has invested money in black Rock and so forth.

Last week, there were rumors that Trump was considering JP Morgan CEO, Jamie Diamond or Demon. My report say it's really Larry, who has been Trump's go to guy for economic advice. Now there's a lot of talk that it's going to be Larry Fink for Treasury secretary, and that'll be Jamie Demon for Commerce secretary, because you know, as Commerce secretary Jamie Demon who is perceived as anti crypto, can do things to punish crypto or to establish CBDC.

You could do one or both of those things, because remember the moves that are being made at state level reflect on the Universal Commercial Code, the UCC stuff. Despite his focus on ESG environmental Social governance, was appointed to Trump's Business Advisory Council. This is not their first rodeo, not their first date, not their first kiss. This stuff has been going on for a while.

He was on Trump's Advisory Council. And so when you look at what is happening with the people, and by the way, let me just say this before I move on. We go back to twenty and sixteen, the fall of twenty sixteen, the election where Trump was running against Hillary. She was considered to be a shoe in, and so she's talking about who her picks are going to be, just like Trump is now right now considered to

be a shoe in. Perhaps he's peaked early, but as he's talking about what his cabinet is going to be and other people talking about same thing was happening with Hillary Clinton in twenty sixteen. Guess who she wanted for Treasury secretary? The same guy that Trump wants. Larry think of Blackrock, Treasury secretary for Hillary Clinton, Treasury secretary for Trump. Tell me that there's a difference

between these people. And I said it before. I said the reason they had to have Trump in twenty sixteen was because can you imagine Hillary Clinton locking everybody down? What would have happened? What would the conservatives? What would the deplorables have done? If she told you to wear a mask, if she told you to stay six feet apart from people, and all the rest of these Simon says nonsense things. Nobody would have done it. They did

it for Trump. They did it because Trump is paying the governors and so forth. She could have paid the governors, but it would have created a lot of pushback. Jd Vance. Now all these things are coming in because of the money that Jadvan's got. No pointed out last week as we're talking about the connections to of Peter thiele To and again, Whitney Webb has done

a very long, comprehensive article. It's great and if you go back and look at Perlunteer, I've been talking about them since twenty fourteen, and I've watched them at Buildeberg. Regular attendees at Buildeberg. Alex Karp, the guy who runs Penaleteer, always there, big military industrial complex warmonger. He wants war everywhere, especially against US domestically. He wants to look at everything that

we're doing. Massive data mining company. They got a lot of government funding saying they were doing it for the intelligence services, doing it for the military, but it's going to be used against US domestically. And so these people have always been there at Buildeberg. They have frequently attended Davos. And let me play for you what Peter Till just came out and criticized Davos, feeding this to the people who just like they want to believe that Elon Musk is

on their side and on the side of Trump. Well he is on the side of Trump. He pays Trump. Maybe Trump is on his side. But Peter Till criticized Davos. Listen to this. I went to the World Economic Forum in Davos the last time in twenty thirteen, and one of the you know, and of course they have you know, they have the same they have the same ideas as the mob. In some ways it is a mob, it is, you know, and people are there only in their

capacity as representatives of corporations or of governments or of NGOs. And it really hit me. There are simply no individuals. There are no individuals in the room. There's nobody there who's representing themselves. And it's this, it's this notion of the future I reject. It's this picture of the future where the future will be a world where there are no individuals. There are no people with ideas of their own. There's nobody to say this is wrong, this

doesn't make sense. And I'm going to think differently. I'm going to think for myself. Well, they do have individuals. They call them stakeholders. The corporations are stakeholders. But let's make no mistake about it. Larry Fink is setting up Black Rock to do exactly what Larry Fank wants it to do. And he's got an agenda and it's in lockstep with her. Klaus as an Ursula fond of Line calls it. And then but if you go back and if you take a look at Peter Tiel, he said, you know,

I went to it once back in twenty thirteen. I don't like these people, you know, they don't respect the individual. Well, he's been a regular attendee at Builderberg. What's the difference between Davos and Bildeberg. One of them is a public face. It is now because of that public face, and because of her Klaus, it is now despised by the world.

Bilderberg was always secret. I always felt that, you know, if you're going to have a conspiracy, it's going to be at the place where it's all kept secret and under wraps is where most of the work is going to be done. And so Peter Thiel was at Builderberg and a regular attendee. And if we go back to I think this is two thousand and five fifteen, you'll see Luke Radowski and stuff. And this report was I don't know

who filmed. This was put up on info war site. But you know info wars doesn't have a problem with Peter Tile or Elon Musk, do they these technocrats connected to either Builderberg Gardavos. Maybe that's why they don't cover Builderberg anymore. But here's when they they're following him along. He's got a bunch of people, small reporters because mainstream media doesn't do this, trying to get

in and make a statement and he's walking along and anything. So he just stops and goes, Okay, I'm gonna say this and I'm going to leave. Don't ask me any other questions, and he makes a statement. Here's a statement at Builderberg Peter Tiel, who just told you I don't like Davos. Oh he loves Bilderberg though. So they're walking along. Finally he stops and talks to them. I'll leave it at or let me just leave it at one statement and then that's it. Okay, okay, yeah, yeah.

I believe it's always important to exchange views with people, no matter what their perspectives are. I believe that. I'm you know, I think that I think that we have a lot of problems in our society and we need to be finding ways to talk to people. We need to find ways to talk to people where not everything is completely transparent. Libertarianism is not synonymous with radical transparency. That's often an argument that the Stasi would make in this Germany,

where everything had to be monitored by society. And I think often you have the best conversations in smaller groups where not everything is being monitored, and that's how you have very honest conversations and how you can think better about the future. Thank you very much. So you have the solution is in your world about it? They're no statements, no taking, no questions. He makes a statement and that setting walks off. Okay, So we don't want

to have something like the Stazi where society monitors everything. No, it wasn't society that was monitoring everything. I mean they didn't. They did employ as snitches everybody in society, But the Stazi was government, and it was government that was watching what everybody was saying and what Peter Thiel and the companies that he created and founded and funded like Pallenteer are doing. They are the high tech Stazi. How cynical to say that, oh, well we should have

some privacy, Well, what about my privacy. You don't care about my privacy, do you. No, you're going to expose everything and repeat everything to the government. You are the Stazi for the government, just because you're using your machines and just because we don't see you know. I was saying to Karen the other day, I said, everybody likes to say that, you know, the the ten Bill rights, they've all been violated except for the third one. I believe the third one has been violated. I believe

it's been violated by these types of things, by the surveillance state. You know, the real issue with quartering troops in your home was the fact that they were going to be there observing everything that you did and reporting it right. That was the biggest issue. Yeah, it was an imposition, it was an expense, it was an inconvenience and all the rest of this stuff. And they have made it very convenient. You don't even know they're there.

They're just like big brother, a fly on the wall watching everything you're doing. But you are quartering in your computer, in your personal papers. You have the NSA, you got the CIA, you got Homeland Security, you got all these different organizations. You got Palaneer that he created. They're all there setting in your living room listening to you. And of course, you know, Larry Fink talked about how he's blockchain tokens and black Rocks planned

to own the fractionalized world. You don't know where this is going. Is going into this creating derivatives of everything, which is part of their Great Taking document, And this is what is said by Technocracy News. Imagine tokenizing everything well, well, you fink already has. He's actually made a verb out of etf Imagine tokenizing everything in the world that has value and converting it to

blockchain things. You own, things, a companies own things, a government zone, the oceans, the forest, the animals, the air, the entire environmental ecosphere. Estimates of value easily exceed three hundred trillion. Now imagine this as the currency base for sustainable activity in all commercial development. And imagine putting the guy who is at the epicenter of this scheme in as Treasury secretary, which is what Trump is talking about doing, which is what Hillary Clinton

was going to do. They're one and the same. Before we run out of time here. On rock fan, Jose grow if I miss, I'm sure I did. Thank you for the tip, says the new Twisters movie also confirmed for me this was probably planned out well in advance, since when does Hollywood paint conservative Americans in a good light. The movie was released just

over a week after the ear incident. From Ear to Eternity on rock Fan, Jason Barker, thank you for the tip again, I appreciate that, says I was unable to stream Nights of the Storm on X this past weekend because I'm not a blue check mark customer. Oh, it is a pay to play network now complete with shadow banning as a feature. Yeah, I you know, I got the blue check mark because I wanted to be able to put up longer post texts to describe what was going on with it,

plus longer videos. But yeah, it is a pay to play thing, and it's going to become more and more like that. They are shutting things down left and right. Well, I'm going to play for you the interview. I don't have time to do a setup for it, but it's still going on. And you know, this CrowdStrike thing that's running through Microsoft and Gotree has got a lot to say about it. It's going to take a

long time do this. At first, I'll look at it. It's like, okay, it's just one one line of code that needs to be fixed. But you got to boot up and then find that line of code. And you've got to do that in millions of computers. How long is it going to take? Nobody really knows what's behind it, you know, a lack of security. And the other question is what are the political connections of CrowdStrike to Hillary Clinton and to a lot of other things. The Russia Gate

stuff and everything. They're all in there, and they've got connections to the election as well. Here's my interview that I recorded with goat Tree on Saturday. Well, joining us now is Goatree and he's been on several times talking about computer cybersecurity issues and other things like that. So when I saw what was happening with crowd strike, I wanted to get him on to get his

take on. As a matter of fact, he was sending me some stuff as the program was going on Friday, and I didn't see it until after the program, So I wanted to do this special report and put this out. Now the name may sound familiar to you, It took me a moment to kind of place it. It's like, oh, yeah, those are the guys that were involved with Hillary Clinton and the Russia Gates stuff, and they were the ones who flagged it for her, and they were the ones

who first put this out. And then, of course, as CNN puts it, they said CrowdStrike was the first to publicly sound the alarm about Russia's interference in twenty sixteen election. Well, that's suspicious. And then Crowdstrike's assessment was later confirmed by US intelligence agencies like Left and Right, and that's all been confirmed. Now CNN just flushed about four or five years of history down the memory hole because we've known for several years this has been thoroughly debunked.

They kept everybody going for a couple of years. But all this stuff about seventeen security agencies and everything that was all Hillary Clinton. And we've gone through all that, but it's all still news to CNN, who pretends that this didn't happen. So now CrowdStrike is at the center of worldwide outage in all kinds of things, from transportation to banking. We've got stores that are closed that can't do business. It is massive because of something that is in their

code. It does not affect it doesn't affect Linux, but it affects Windows. But it has affected businesses and airports around the world. We got entire airlines that have shut down. Some of them are using whiteboards to put stuff out. So I guess unless you want to fly Amish air you may be out of luck with traveling anywhere. So I want to get goatree on and get his take on this. Thank you for joining us. Goatree happy Saturday to be fun. Yeah, yeah, it is. Go ahead. What

do you think is going on with this? You're you're looking at this and one of the things that you point out so interesting that it's just, you know, one little line of code fifteen characters that's caused all this grief. Yeah, you know, CrowdStrike basically, I'll just read how they described themselves. CrowdStrike services provide so the best practice framework needed to access enhance cybersecurity maturity

levels. Election system Oh yeah, election systems, boys and girls, to protect the integrity of the voting process and sanctity of the democratic institutions under which we thrive. Yeah. Oh, they're already advertising they're going to be handling the elections. Yeah, that's right. Yeah, there it is right there, cybersecurity for election systems. Now, then that great. You know, we got NewsGuard from Microsoft that's going to make sure the news is good.

They got Election Guard to make sure that elections are going to be get and we also got CrowdStrike, who's going to make sure that the elections are safe from any tampering. Yeah. And you know I've called this, I guess since it's a cybersecurity company doing for doing it we can't call it a hack. Let's call it a nextploit. Yeah, I'm named at the Revenge of

the Closed Source Strike Again. What that means is this is geek speak for vendor back doors, vender ports, open courts, whatever geek speak you want to apply to this old Doss Windows operating system. Yeah, and that's the anything that Windows hasn't really fundamentally changed forever, right, decades of stuff that's built on top of this garbage that's at the founder, that's got a really old foundation, doesn't it. It is antiquitated, It is not changed.

They just put new skins on it. And these little I mean, I mean this has been RAND since nineteen well wind to Bill Gates Stealer nineteen eighty two. Yeah, that's right. And it's never been modified for current operations. I mean everybody, Okay, all these guys that built their careers on wind Us and this, they're going to say, you don't know what you're talking about. But basically, UDEs and basic commands are still DOSS and it's not changed. Yeah. And well, for instance, it only puts fifteen

characters in this code. Strength can you think of fifteen characters to crash millions? Of Windows operated laptops, desktops and servers. Can we talk a little bit about what is and let's let's talk a little bit about what is actually happening. I mean, what they're getting the blue screen of death that's not booting up. Is that correct? But the people have its right and what it has done is it's locked. Let's let me go back for just a

second. I'm working on my notes because this is this has been like kicking over Pandora's box and uh Medusa pops out. Because this is a this is not what it looks like. Basically, it is causing these machines to uh continually try to boot up, but there's it's not allowing them to. It's just it's getting your conflicts. And you have to go into the back back way in which is through the safe I don't use Windows that much. I mean fact we used Windows years ago. But you have to go into safe

mood. Then you have to scroll through fan file, find this one fifteen character code and manually remove it. And you know you have billion biblic sublimees of code all through these servers and things like that, So you're looking for a fifteen character code to remove right now. If you think about it, it's so surreal because there's been there's trillions suppliants cood out there making things operate, and billions of dollars spent on digital security and a simple little fifteen character

cood breaks millions and winds devices all the critical infrastructure. Wow. So if you remove this thing and you get into safe mode, then you've got to go into some kind of a text editor to try to find that one line of those fifteen characters and remove it. Is that what the real hitches? Well, I lost your audio there? Did you drop your phone? No? Okay, we're back there, we're back, We're back yeah, okay. Now what you've got to do is and this goes back to dass.

I mean, these guys that want to argue with me, they can argue to their tonsils roll out on the floor. We have to go back to the file which is written on Dawson backbone, open that file and then go through and locate that fifteen line code and remove it manually. And that's the time consuming that's going to do, and that's going to be different for every computer, presumably because the things that have been put in there where that is located in the file or in duty. Yes, so it's not just simply

go in and open up. Hopefully the IP people were smart enough not to change the name on the fil but some of them do. Yeah. Well, let me read this to you. This is from Futurism, says Microsoft recommends rebooting your computer fifteen times as blue Screen of Death strikes worldwide. The subtitle is have you tried turning it on and off again? Which is the first thing text of what I always ask you? And then on and on and off again and again again. And they said, as the world is

reeling that this is their instructions to try. Yeah, fifteen times. I mean, if you want to try to go treat method, hit with a hammer a couple of times, that don't work, bouncing off the floor a couple of times. Yeah, some people are I better. Some people are doing that right now because they're so upset about is what is happening with this?

And so we got all these computers that have gone down, and they're saying it might take weeks, and I guess it's because it's difficult to find that particular piece of code to to fix it, right, and the mass well, let's split it into concept. You know, average business, let's just say, I don't know, a million dollar a year business. They probably have twenty five maybe thirty some of them, you know, in automation

and things like them. They have fifty fifty laptops or desktops or whatever to operate their business and their people and their business, and they only have one IT guy where they take us add one IT guy to an hour per laptop, desktop, server, whatever to clear it. So right there you have got fifty to sixty manuires just bringing the computers back on that. So if you get these multinationals, their IT is usually no more than let's see,

the way they like to work is seven. Let's just say they've got a thousand computers down, they've got seven IT people. They've got a problem. You know they're talking weeks or months. Yeah, yeah, I see of the problems. Yeah, they multiply it out code. Right, it's not the code, it is the correction that is going to be causing the right. And of course these computers are not necessarily going to be uh all, the one physical location. They're going to be distributed to a lot of different

places. For all these IT guys to try to it's crazy. Now you've been talking about it on a Friday. Yeah, this occurred on a Friday. Wait till people get get in the offices that weren't in the office on Friday. Wait till they get it in on Monday and get their surprise. Yeah. Wow. Well you've been talking about this kind of stuff for quite some time, the kind of exploits you were talking about it with railroads and things like that, right, Yeah, this is to explain this in a

simple way. You know when we were talking about this Palestine, Ohio railroad crash. Yeah, I sent you that video of the railroad dude opening the remote shack. It had the automated safety equipment in it. It was all there, radio, computer, keyboard, everything, just sitting there waiting the rock and roll. We'll send in information either event driven or on a schedule. Well me, mister blackhat, the only thing between me and it is

a padlot. So if I'll knocked that pad lot and get in in there and insert I don't know, let's just say a petty character line of code that'll take down that railroad. I can insert it, embbed it into the hourly er event transmission. When that happens, it's going to deploy on their email server, whichever server it goes to, whatever it's routed to. When

they open it up, it starts breaking things. And as you pointed out before, you know, a lot of these things ship with a default passcode that is there in the manual, and a lot of times they don't change the default password. And if they do change the default password, frequently what they'll do is write it there next to the password for the next guy who's coming in. Because it's a housle for the wall right the whole walls.

You know, that's that's just human nature. That's what's happening with these systems. Well, this is the same principle that happened with this crowd strike. CrowdStrike does it as a update. Well, basically, these remote needs are standing updates. It may be information and you can't insert mountain mount the code malware into it and do the same thing. I mean, it'll the head

or come comes across one o'clock update. Everything's fine dandy, And at the bottom you in seart your code and the system's going to read the code too, and it can't execute that code because machines are dumb. Computer's dumb. They're driven on commands. So if it sees this update, this operational update sees COO, don't it, it could actually execute that cood. Then you have the domino effect or the waterfall effect happening. Yeah, and we had

that man talk a little bit about the Colonial pipeline as well. You know when we had that situation happening. Pen tests, well, this this was one. It was it's either twenty fifteen or twenty sixteen. We did some ten testing on a pipeline and these used these very small devices that basically took pressure flow and uh all these rates that that was needed to make the pipeline of function efficiently. Then they would send in these one hour updates. Well

they kept these in these plastic they were going eat locked. They were in these like plastic things where your water sprinkler is. We pop that open, we took the discount, put ours in it, and uh we waited about an hour and they started getting alarms at the Master's system and uh hours was not meant to hurt anything. It was just simply a spoof letting them know that we were in the system. They had. I think we had I think we were playing disco music and had a flashing screen. And that's what

they hire you for. They hire you as a white hat hacker to find the vulnerabilities and report them to them, and to play some disco music. Yeah, you know, put them from Casey and the Sunshine Man or yok oh no Screaming at Night. Yeah. No, we only say that for squad. Basically, we let them know we were in the system and if we were up to new good, we could do anything we choose to.

So we made them listen to some really weird disco music. And yeah, that's interesting, you know when you look at this and uh again, we keep seeing this over and over again. We've had a couple of now Colonial pipeline they had a hack that but from what it was reported, it attacked their counting system and not the pipeline. Is that correct, Yes, And

that seems to be easy see these ancillary systems. I mean we saw that with the airlines that got shut down for like a twenty four hour period because somebody hacked into the NOTEAM system, which is a warning system that tells the planes if there's some incident in or around an airport, on a runway or

something like that. So it's just kind of a news alert broadcast. But if they didn't have that ability to warn planes and that was taken down, the FAA just shut down all of the planes for about a twenty four hour people. Yes, well you've got right now just off this exploit of thousands of flights either very delayed or canceled. I mean, you've got people that are basically stranded at the moment. Well we're talking about this on Saturday.

Yesterday afternoon, I looked and they said that all of United and all of American airlines or shut down. So I don't know how extensive that is in the United States, but all their planes, all their planes are shut down. And like I said, fifteen character codes, what's done it? And I would hate to be part of their IT department. These guys aren't going to get home for a month. But you know, you're going back to how to get into these systems. It doesn't matter where you find the vulnerability,

you can exploit it. It's like with colonial pipeline, Well they found it in the payroll or whatever department they got into. When you're proving a network, you look for the vulnerability. You don't care where it is because Once you get in, you can burrow to wherever you want to go.

So I mean, I could in theory find an unguarded I don't know site for their janitorial staff by them in, and you know, you could have the janitorial department of Doom sitting there terrorizing the company as a real hits the fan scenario, isn't it. Yeah, well, you know we leave this

thing so this thing is caught in this loop trying to boot up. I guess is what is happening when this thing goes through and they've got to manually remove this, and you know, it's time consuming for each one of these things, just multiplied out by all the computers that this has been put on. They can't do it evidently remotely because computer can't boot up, so it's got to be fixed at each and every one of these. You know, we talked about this before the blaster worm and things like that. We got

a history of this. One person's going back to White two K. They said, this is what we feared about White two K, but it's really happened. And of course shortly after that there was a blaster worm as well. Right, Yeah, the blaster worm goes back to I think it was two thousand and three. It was an old well once again, you know, it goes back to Dass. They say, oh, this is all

in the windows blah blah blah. Basically this I forget which forget which Blackborn windows platform it happened on, But it breacked them up the same way in two thousand and three, and I think it was XP windess XP That's what it was. And you know, everybody says, oh, it's how corrected, its fixed this this well here just said twenty one years later, it's

back the same exploit. And the tea people, a lot of them weren't even born or were watching Teletubbies in twenty three, and they're they're getting a dose of something that's been around for twenty some odd years. Oh yeah, and everybody, this goes back to the backbone of windows. This is all Doss related. People can argue with me and they can carry on, and you know, it's like, that's fine. That have you known, really

truly know the architecture wends. It's forty something year old architecture. It's just been reskinmned and asked, some various things added. But the crux of it the backbone of its same as it was nineteen eighty four, eighty five. Yeah, yeah, that's true. Well, well let's talk a little bit about this. The conspiracy theories that are out there. We've got this has put out of mainstream media to cover up for this stuff, and it was

pushed out by DRUDG report. Online conspiracy theories abound after the major global IT crash and it appeared. This is a company that I'd never seen their name before talking about this and Sabra c y A b r A. Have you heard of them? Uh? It is a disinformation security company. So these are people, you know, we got people that want to make sure that

we don't have any uh disinformation out there. But this is disinformation security company and they're focused on shutting down these conspiracy theories before they travel around the world. Right, Well, good luck with that. Come on, come to me a disinformation company. I'll take you out of school. Yeah. I've never heard of them, but I don't pay attention to them because they're basically are aren't in on my radar. And if they want to make a run

at me, welcome to I'll show them some different disinformation. But I've sent you some direct connections. I want you to follow up on because crowd strike is in a partnership with the WOMM and you know that the World Economic Pool is warning of mass cyberstrikes. Yeah, yeah, and that was a couple of years ago. They're talking about cyber Polygon. I think, wasn't it.

I think it was twenty twenty two if I'm not mistaken. But they're warning everybody else are yeah, oh yeah, still talking about it and and so that is really the purpose of this news article was to inoculate the World Economic Form to give them immunity from these conra they old, you know, because people don't like the World Economic Forum. It's been the brunt of these

conspiracy theories. Well it's because they've been talking about how this is what's going to happen, and then it happens with a company that is connected deeply with them. It's the one that pulls yes and crowd Well it gets better though, WF and crowd Strike. They just go to their website. They'll tell you that their partners with the WEF and they are globally involved in elections with Now this is the good working partnership with the WF linked to global cyber Alliance.

Now, the misinformation guys you gave me, I'm not even going to pay attention to them. The Global Cyber Alliance is what you need to research. Everybody's going to be listening to this Apple. Look at Global Cyber Alliance. You've never heard of them, but they are part of the wees and that's really interesting. Mm hmmm. Yeah. And this is uh sorry,

go ahead, no, no, no, go ahead. I just want everybody to focus on this Global cyber Alliance, focus on the Global cyber Alliance, and focus on the connections to elections, because that's really what this is about. I think we've got to go back to paper. I mean,

it's just, you know, there's no perfect system. But when you go back to something that is physical like that, that keeps it keeps away the global thieves that can break in everywhere and multiply multiply this, you know, in the same way that what we're talking about in terms of doing the repair on this, it is difficult to get that done because you've got a limited number of people that can go out there and fix these different machines. And

that's the very reason why you want to have paper elections. You know, you're going to have some crooked areas like Chicago. We're going to stuff the ballots regardless of what you do or what form they're in. But what you do when you have a physical ballot like that, what you do is you make an obstacle for them that they can't be everywhere all at once and change all these things. But they can do that if it's computerized. Well,

it's interesting. Crowdstrikes are providing security for the United States elections on November Fear. What if the elections aren't going the way they see fit and they have another update and they brick the election machines. Yeah, we said, wow, that's impossible. Well look what they've just done. Yeah, oh no. I remember I've talked many times about what happened in Brazil with smart Magic.

You know, that was start one of the first electronic voting machine companies at the time, it was started in Venezuela with some friends of Hugo Chavez to keep him in office. But they've had accusations of disruption and fraud and several states in Mexico and the Philippines, in Brazil and in Brazil you had exactly that scenario. You had this leftist who was really lagging behind the polls.

From all indications, she has booed off of the out of the stadium the day before the election football stadium, and she was losing significantly, and then all the machines go down, and then they're down for a while, and then when they come back up, she's switched positions with the other guy. And so yeah, it is very young for them to do that type of thing with electronic machines. Well, let's stay for instance, yesterday,

today's Saturday, it would be Friday. Uh Arizona was having their early balancing for I don't know if what it was. It may have been primaries, early elections of early voting, I don't know. They had that same event happen. H yeah, right in the middle of the elections. Yeah, all from this exploit. Well yeah, yeah, this exploit it's kind of like, you know, who watches the watchers? Right, That's what the problem is. The problem with government is that we're not angels, as Madison

said, Uh, but so we need to have government. But when we have government, who watches the government? Because there's made up of men who are not angels, And the same same thing happens when you talk about police or when you talk about cybersecurity, who watches the watchers? How do we keep this thing under control? How do we know that crowds that's right, that has been involved in the farious things just eight years ago at the center

of these false claims about the election at the time. How do we know what they're doing? Are they an honest broker? They insinuated themselves pretty much everywhere they got evident. I didn't realize I had such a massive footprint globally. Well, the weird thing about all this is, Okay, they disrupted Arizona elections yesterday, this exploit Tom's only five days after the attempted assassination of President Trump. Yeah, that's right. I mean, there's just too many

coincidences to ignored here, wouldn't you think? And who watches the watchers? There? Who watches the Secret Service to make sure they're actually doing their job, they're not setting things up? You know, it's another example. It's very much like that, except this is the computer version of it. Yeah. And you know, if they want to send the of cyber disinformation dudes after me, bring it, yeah, ye, after both of us. It's uh, that's why you know, we have to call it the way

we see it. It is extremely suspicious. Their connections to the world economic form and their connections to the elections are very suspicious at the very least. You know, again, when you when you're looking at this situation, the shooting there in Pennsylvania Trump, you look at it in terms of incompetence, and it's always these two things. Is it incompetence or is it maliciousness? And when the competence or it could be both, Yeah, exactly, because

people can use that that incompetence in a malicious way. Some people can use that, and so it's always difficult. What's that? Yeah, weapon nasty competence otherwise known as D I didn't earn it. Yeah, that's right. Well, it certainly is interesting, and we'll be following this. Anything else that we haven't covered that you want to want to mention before we call it quits here, No, I mean that that's pretty much it. This is

all documented. And if your listeners want to take it upon themselves to go start doing from digging and researching, you know, they're going to be surprised with what they find. Yeah, that's right. And another thing, if we get this word app to think about it is even if this is actually what we think, shining light on this stuff always makes them alter their game

plan mm hmmm. Or if everybody knows, well, if everybody knows what's what's uh, they suddenly are able to operate in the dark, and they may pivot off of whatever they have planned. That's right. If it's malice, you want to shine the light on it. If it's incompetent, you want to shine the light on it. So you know, we look at this and it's like, is this incompetence or is it malice? Either way,

we need to shine the light on it. And already, you know, we got the CEO of CrowdStrike is out there getting visibly angry with it because he's had I don't know how much the stock is down now and off hours trading and everything, but yesterday it lost a little over ten percent yesterday. It probably keep going down if people still got their computers down, and we'll have a lot of computers down at the beginning of the week. It's going to continue to go into free fall. And I hope he's got a

golden parachute because he may be defenestrated pretty soon. Thrown out the window. I hate to break that. I hate to admit. I live like we're going to win in room. I shorted him yesterday, So I hope he's trying crocodiles. There, you go. That's the way to profit off of this stuff. Well, you know they have short changed us, that's for sure, and that'd be a fair response to short their stocks. Created a lot of misery for a lot of people, and it was the every security

thing that actually did it. So we're seeing this over and over again, the structures that are there to protect us, and again as you and I talk about the incredible fragility of our infrastructure and how the more complex it gets, the more fragile it becomes, and the more vulnerable it becomes to somebody who is malicious. But with that complexity, and then with DEI the whole

thing, everybody needs to start shorting the infrastructure. And by that I mean going out and prepping for yourself and making sure that you're going to be okay if this House of cards falls down because of fifteen characters. That's really what we're looking at right here. Well, that gentleman you had on yesterday with his civil defense books, Yeah, I don't know him, I've never read

them. I think they would be a good investment. Yes, I'm thinking about I mean, I've got my basis covers somewhat well, but I'm going to make an investment in getting some of his books. Yeah, yeah, Civil Defendsmanuel dot Com as Jack laws and he's had a wealth of experience as a mercenary soldier in the military, and then he knows people in special forces and so he had them talk about their areas of responsibility. So yeah, you can look at that. And he's got a free chapter there about water

because that's the principal thing. He can't go along without water. And we've got all of our water systems are now being hacked left and right all over the place as well. They can mess up the delivery, they can mess up the water itself in these systems. So as everything goes online, as everything becomes more and more complicated, it gets more and more vulnerable. And I guess that's the key takeaway and for people to prepare for themselves. Well,

thank you so much for joining us. Well sorry, go ahead, okay, and you tell Jackie ows me a cup of coffee from promote in this book, do that. Yeah, thank you for coming on, thank you for doing a Saturday with me. It's it's important to get this stuff out and people need to start paying attention to this. This is going to be a really wild ride, I think between now and the election, and

I don't think things are going to slow down after the election. I think that's it's going to continue to escalate as we come to a close on this fourth turning. We've got another four years of it and I think we're going to have a lot of crazy things that are going to be happening. And it isn't really from our perspective, you know, we can look at it as it malicious or is it incompetence, But either way, you've got to prepare for when this stuff goes down. So thank you for joining uscoa tree

and explain this stuff. Appreciate it, my pleasure. David. Hearing of bias and false neooze has become too common on social media without first unfortunately, and this is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous

to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Break free from the usual script with The David Knight Show a fresh perspective bringing you genuine insights on current events. But if the show is going to stay on the air, we'll need your continued support. Sharing the show, subscribing and even

just hitting the like button all help. And if you found our show helpful, please consider donating and becoming a part of a community that values the truth because independent, listener funded news untouched by corporate globalist agendas, is extremely important to our liberties.