All right, welcome back and joining us now is Eric Peters of Eric petersautos dot com or ep autos dot com. And it's always great to have Eric on. I wanted to get him on before the traveling begins on the holidays and earlier today, Well, thank you for joining us, Eric, appreciate you coming on. Thanks. Oh, thank you, David. And let's enjoy our travel ball. We can still travel, that's right. Yeah.
Earlier today I talked about I got some articles from just before Thanksgiving in twenty twenty, MPR and all these other people trying to scare everybody to death. Don't go see Grandma, You'll die, and all all the rest of this stuff. And make sure if you rent a car that you wipe everything down that the fear in the paranoid. We must not forget that, you know, we must not forget how they scared people to death so they can't do it again. Well, not only must we not forget, I think we
also shouldn't forget. They've got the X will apologize for any of that. That's right. To acknowledge that, you know, assuming good intentions, that they were bamboozled, fooled, and to acknowledge that and to say, gosh, you know, we're really sorry that we that we involve ourselves in this and that we helped to enable this, and this must never happen again. And until they until they apologize, I'm not going to forgive them for it,
that's right. Well, you know, it's always been a rule of thumb for the government that they would make two mistakes rather than admit to one. Right, But I don't think this is a mistake. I think it was malicious, and you know, I think that they really do want to take everything from it so that we own nothing and we go nowhere and we have no life. I really do think that they all signed on to that World Economic Forum agenda, and yeah, we got two months into the you
know, the so called pandemic gough cough. You know, at that point, you know, initially I would be willing to cut them a little bit of slack because this thing just sort of happened out of nowhere, and you know, okay, maybe we should err on the side of caution. But within a couple of months it was apparent clear factual that this thing was was being hyped, it was being exaggerated, and that there were malicious lives.
You know, you and I have talked repeatedly in the past about the way they endlessly hourly talked about the cases, the cases, not explaining to people that there's a big difference between a so called case, i e. A positive test and somebody admitted to a hospital, let alone somebody who actually died. But they wanted to conflate those two things to convey the impression that every day thousands of people were essentially dying from this sickness, which was a believing
lie, and they knew it was a lie. So it begs the question why did they lie? And as you say, they did it because they're malicious, that's right. Yeah, Kerry Molsson won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR. Things said, yeah, you can find anything if you magnified enough, and of course they were magnifying it by one point one trillion times with a number of cyclopees. You know, right now we're seeing the same kind of thing manifests with regard to the climate change to stereo that I've written
about. They're trying to conflate this idea of a fractional increase in the fraction of the percent of the Earth's atmosphere that is CO two, which is zero point zero four percent roughly that somehow, this tiny, tiny constituent background non reactive gas, there's a slight fractional increase in that amount, let alone, whether that's caused by motor vehicles, somehow, that's going to cause a catastrophic climate crisis. And it's absurd as trying to pathologize a virus that didn't kill
ninety nine point eight percent of the otherwise healthy, non elderly population. Yeah, that's right. As a matter of fact. You know, I saw this coming because I've been fighting with them over the climate thing, and they were covering up their data and lying about it. We got their emails. But of course it came up with this T shirt here. Mcguffin. I'll just plug this shamelessly here because I talk about Hitchcock and the mcguffin. You
know, he says it doesn't really matter what the mcguffin is. It's what everybody is chasing, right, It's just whatever motivates people. And so we've seen you know, global freezing, global warming, we've seen a pandemic. All these things are to motivate people. It doesn't really matter. And so you know, we created this T shirt so people can wear that, and people say, what's the Mcguffin's ultimately common the common denominator here is here.
Yeah, you know they have weaponized here. Of course that's something to go everments have specialized in from time the memorial get people scared and as they can put it, they will be clamorous to be led to safety. And that's ultimately what this is all about, even if safety means their insurferment and their
impoverishment. That's right. But it was so important, wasn't that that Really cars really were our lifeline in twenty twenty, because otherwise they would have really had us in their little fifteen minute city or less right, they would have had us locked in our living rooms if it hadn't been for the cars. And even then on Thanksgiving they were trying to scare people away from using the
cars because that was the lifeline. They want to get rid of cars because in that way they can control wherever you go with the planes, trains and buses that are left or you know, if you don't have a private automobile, and if it's you have to rent the automobile by the ride they got you there too, you know. So it's about making us dependent and having us under complete control. That's what getting rid of cars is ultimately going to mean. Sure, it's so much easier to lock down the populast one.
You don't even have to literally lock them down. You can just sort of throw a switch and prevent their vehicle from being operational. Yeah, point perfectively locked down, you know, and it isn't even necessary to do it for the car per se. What they want is essentially managed a form of power that is entirely under their control. So they can meter the electricity, they
can turn it off, they can turn it on. So even if you could control the car, what uses it to you if they control the electricity, That's right, Yeah, I talk about that, you know, with Thomas Massage put this thing together, try to stop this kill switch thing, and he couldn't even get support amongst the GOP for that. What does that tell us? Well, you know, I think it's because they succeeded in framing it and it was brilliant. Again, I have to give these authoritarian
leftist credit for the way they framed things. They put it in terms of an impaired driving switch technology. In other words, They conveyed the idea that this is about preventing people who are drunk or otherwise impaired, whether by alcohol or drugs, from driving vehicles. And it's very difficult for anybody to oppose that, because, after all, you are you are you for drunk driving? You know that's you know, when was the last time you beat your
wife? It's the same kind of an argument. Of course, Massey took the time to deconstructed and pointed out that the actual language in the government decree talks about driver performance, which is a very different thing from impairment. You know, what they want to do is to characterize you're driving if it's outside of the parameters that the government decides are acceptable. That's got nothing to do
with whether you're drunk or high or whatever. It is simply if the government decides that the way you drive is outside of the parameters that the government likes, that will constitute effectively impairment, and then that will be the pretext for controlling your driving by basically, in effect, the car will pull itself over. You don't need cops anymore. The car will really stop working. And you know, I also point out to people this isn't something that's coming in
twenty twenty six. It's already here. It's been here for a number of years. Practically every new car that's available right now has one degree or another of the foundational technology that is going to comprise the whole system. When this thing's fully enabled, already embedded in it, and it's just a matter of turning it all on. Yeah, that's right, and you go back and
you look at it. You know, we've talked many times about how with surveillance and control, they can automatically issue you a ticket, they can automatically increase your insurance rates and everything because hey, you stopped too quickly, or you took that turn too quickly, or this or that. You know, not even about the speed, but they can micromanage everything about the way that
you're driving. And it's like, well, I don't like the way you did that or this, and so I'm going to give you a ticket. I'm going to raise your insurance rates. Now they can just cut the thing off, right, Yeah. The idea is to make driving as unpleasant as possible, in addition to making it impossible to drive, so that you just won't want to. And people think that this is exaggerated. Talk to a guy who drives commercially, Talk to anybody who drives a big rid These guys
are micromanaged to the end degree. If you've ever wondered why when you're out on the inter state and there's a semi in the left lane and there's a semi in the right lane, and the guy in the left lane is kind of just barely creeping by the guy in the right lane who's maybe doing fifty seven miles and the other semmy is going maybe sixty two miles an hour trying to get around him. The reason is because if it goes any faster, he's going to lose his job. So he has to drive within these parameters.
And that's it. And they've already beta tested it with commercial drivers, and they're going to do it to us. They've already embedded the stuff in the car. So I've written a couple of articles about, for example, what they call advanced driver assistance technology, and I love how they always call it assistance, and assistance is synonymous with control. It's about controlling you, it's not about assisting you. I don't need assistance to know what the speed
limit is or how fast i'm driving. But what the system does advanced speed limit assistance technology is that it correlates the speed that you're driving with the posted speed limit on the road, and the car knows that you're driving faster than the speed limit and then a little icon flashes in the dashboard for now just saying, oh, look, you're speeding. But in Europe it pushes back
on the throttle on the gas pedal to prevent it from speeding. Now, you can still kind of push through that, meaning if you push harder on the gas, it'll override it. But the implicit point is that they have the ability to literally throttle your vehicle to prevent you from driving any faster than whatever the speed limit is on any road that you have to be driving on in real time. And that's just one aspect of this technology that's right.
And when you talk about them putting it on in terms of selling it like an impaired driver, that was a way that they were selling. Is this the same device so they were selling before saying we're going to mandate that everybody get a breathalyzer or something like that in order to start. Is that a
part of it? Is it extended beyond that or have they changed. It's definitely a component of it, though it's not merely that they want to have some sort of passive alcohol detection technology in the car meeting that you know, your hand, let's say, touches the gear selector, and that it has the capacity to sample your skin and somehow determine whether you've been drinking as a
result of that. That's merely a facet of it, and it's the way that they're marketing and presenting it, and an aspect of it that I think is very critical to examine and to understand is it was once the case in this country that you had to have been convicted of something before you got punished
for exactly. Yeah, that's why I was going. You know, like, if you were pulled over because you were weaving all over the road, and you had your day in court and you were convicted of drunk driving, one of the things that typically would result from that, if they allowed you to drive again, would be that you would have to have your car fitted with an interlock system. Are interlock system that required the convicted drunk driver to
show that he wasn't drunk before he could drive the car. Well, now we're all to be presumed impaired and drunk drivers without anybody having been convicted of anything, just the same. And it's all the piece that we're now all presumptive terrorists if we wish to fly commercially. Yeah. Yeah, well that's the way the regulatory state works. I mean, you have regulation with that representation, we have taxation with that representation. And of course they are rules.
They say, you don't have any due process, you don't have any presumption of innocence. There's always about that, you know, prove that you don't owe me taxes, prove this and prove that, and so that's what it's going to be about it. And of course we've also eric had a civil asset forfeiture where they could confiscate your car, confiscate your home, confiscate your cash without even charging you with a crime, let alone finding you guilty. And so yeah, this is this is where they operate. I just
look at it from a practical standpoint. If they're going to start monitoring people for uh, you know, being drunk and driving, I'm just wondering, you know, if you're going to get a false reading because the alcohol in somebody's perfume, if they put it on a bit heavy because there's a lot of alcohol imperfume. It's impart as possible. Yeah, it's a new scenario, the scenario that I see unfolding. You know, we use the word to kill switch. I think it could potentially be the kill switch for the
car industry. The more people figure this out, understand what's happening. Would you want to spend forty or fifty thousand dollars on a car that effectively is under the control of someone else, some corporate entity that's spying on you constantly, that the government could shut off at any time. Probably not, And
of course I guess that's kind of what they want. But you know, the car industry has got to you know, I wish they'd riddle it out, reason it out, and think to themselves, g you know, our products are becoming increasingly unpopular and people aren't going to want to buy them. How are we going to continue to make money? It seems like we haven't made that connection yet. Yeah. Yeah, they need to start lobbying in
favor of freedom, as you know the gun industry does. But you know, when we when we look at how this is moving and now they don't want us to have any choice in all this. You've got an article it's not about saving you money. Talk about that. The fact that you have a very good example about Toyota Camris, the you know, the non electric version and then the hybrid version. Talk a little bit about that. What
the government is forcing. Let's set the stage. You know, the regulatory apparat will say that it's going to issue some new mandate as for example, the corporate average Fuel Economy requirement, in order to compel the automakers to produce more fuel efficient cars. And implicit in that is that there aren't fuel efficient cars already available, which of course is a demonstrable lie. What they're trying to do is essentially force engine cars off the market in favor of battery powered
cars. That's the real purpose of CAFE what they've done with regard to this particular case. You know, Camra is I think the best selling Onily's car on the market. Toyota sells something like three hundred thousand of these things every year, and it's currently the last car of its type that you can still get with a V six engine. They used to be common, used to be able to get them in Honda Cords, Hyndai sonatas practically any kind of a car. Well, the V six engine is becoming kind of like a
V twelve engine was twenty years ago. In other words, it's an exotic power plant for the ultra affluent. I mean, even fifty thousand Mercedes and BMW's no longer come with a six cylinder engine standard. You have to pay extra to get it. They typically with a little two point zero leter four
cylinder engine. And the reason for that is there's simply no way for a V six to average close to fifty miles per allan, which is what the latest round of CAFE mandates requires and then go into effect in twenty twenty six. So it's so extreme that not only did Toyota have to take the V six out of the lineup, it's no longer even just a four cylinder engine. It's a four cylinder hybrid engine that's going to be the standard power plant
going forward. And you know, on the one hand, the government says, well, isn't this wonderful. This thing is going to get close to fifty miles for gallon and see how much money we save you. But they don't tell you that the thing is going to cost you five or six thousand dollars more to buy relative to an equivalent camera without the hybrid technology. How long are you going to have to drive it to earn back that five or
six thousand dollars. Leaving aside, okay, you've also lost the opportunity cost of that money that you had to spend upfront on the car. And it also assumes you can afford your budget is such that you can just expand your budget to afford to finance a car that's now thirty five thousand dollars rather than twenty seven thousand dollars for twenty eight thousand dollars. There's an incredible arrogance there.
And you know, the hybrid camera is already available for those who want the higher efficient model and are willing to pay a little extra money to get that, But that's never good enough for the government. For the government, good enough is something that we never get to because if we did get to it, then the government would have to say, Okay, mission accomplished, we don't need to continue to regulate you, and that will never happen,
just like with the zero COVID stuff. You know, if even one person has the sniffles. We still have to have a full these policies and force. That's right. Yeah, that's a great point that you made too, and you made that in the article. The fact that, look, we've already got a Toyota hybrid as well as a six cylinder engine and you know, people have a choice already. It's not like this doesn't exist. It exists. The government doesn't like consumers having a choice. They're not pro choice.
And you know, when we go back, and we talked about this for years as well, what they're going to do with the evs and electric vehicles, and they're already talking about it. You know, their kill switch is to basically set up a way that they can suck the juice out of the car battery that you put in there when they need it for their grid. So they're going to use these evs as a backup for their grid,
and that's really going to be a kill switch for the evs. And you get to pay extra to get an electric vehicle so they can use it as the battery for the grid. You talk about the power plant, you know, the six cylinder power plant, but they're putting emission regulations on grid electrical grid power plants as well. And this is new, this is something that's just happened this year. So when we look at this, they're absolutely shutting
everything down. And that is the plan. That's what Biden is doing. It's not just you know, zero emissions is zero mobility, zero that you own, zero food everything. They want to zero it out because they want to zero out the population and they want to zero out our freedom. It's kind of interesting too. I came across a couple of articles. I want
to get your comments on this. I've seen in the UK they've had the National Health System has decided that they're going to spend sixty five pounds in order to make electric emergency vehicles electric. Yeah, exactly, good luck with that. Well, we'll be there in a couple hours when we get this thing
charge. They already tried this in New York. New York decides they were going to do electric snowplows, and then they ran into what you've talked about and other people taught and Nicole whether the batteries don't last too long when they're doing really heavy work, they don't last too long. And since they need to have these snowplows, do like twelve hour shifts. These things could at best get like two hours out of it. But that was putting a happy
face on it. It's pretty amazing to see this insanity, and they're running up against some very real world opposition, whether or not people are going to oppose them. The laws of nature are going to oppose these regulatory fiads, aren't they. Yeah, well, the truth is going to oppose them.
They manage it as far as they have with regard to electric vehicles, because most people don't understand the electric vehicle and the limitations of the electric vehicle, and of electricity as a portable storage power source and what it takes to make that work in a vehicle, in the setting up a motor vehicle. But the truth about that is getting out there, and as a result of the
truth getting out there, there's beginning to be opposition to it. It's no longer like, well, you know, this is a one for one slot, and hey, it'll be fine, it's good for the climate whatever. I'll be able to continue events before I'll have a vehicle that functions ventially as beforeress happens to be electric. People are beginning to realize now you're you're actually you're going to have to accept a great diminishment in terms of your flexibility,
your mobility, as well as what it's going to cost you. And as a result of that, Uh, this whole EV juggernaut is running up against a great uh, a great bit of what you might call hesitancy in terms of people buying them. Uh. The things are being built because the manufacturers are under the pressure of the mandates to produce them, but it doesn't mean people have to buy them yet. You know, nobody's being at in their
back telling them they have to go buy an EV. And this is this is setting up a dynamic where I think what's going to happen next is that the government is going to start doing whatever it has to do to eliminate the alternatives to the electric vehicle. Uh, they're going to they're already pushing non electric vehicles essentially off the market in terms of new vehicles, but then they're
going to go after the ones that we already have. They're going to they're going to try to figure out ways to make them inconvenient, if not illegal
to use. It's entirely possible that they could do things like pass the mandate requiring that gas pumps operate more slowly, for example, so that it takes you twenty minutes to put five gallons of gas in your car, so that there's sort of a parody there between your non electric car and the electric car that has to sit there tethered to that pump, that the charge pump for twenty minutes to get a partial charge. Or they could just use environmental regulations
to say, we can't have these gas stations every where. We're going to close them down so that gas I think that'd be I think that's very likely, you know, because you look at all the paranoia about it, and of course you know some of the old gas stations they do have to dig them up and repair the underground tanks and things like that from time time.
But look at the paranoia that they've had. You know, those those little the little sleeve that they put around the nozzle when you pumpo vavor guard, yeah, to keep the gas from getting out of the because they're all going to die if that happens, right, you know, they could always do something hamfisted, like, you know, impose really heavy taxes in the name of stopping climate change on gas. You know, gas gets to be ten or fifteen dollars a gall and all of a sudden, an electric car looks
more attractive. And I think that they are going to have to do this because their goal of getting and what is it. I think it's it's at least fifty, if not seventy percent of the cars fully electric by twenty thirty, I think is the goal. Correct, that's not going to happen. We're all you know, we're not that far away. It's almost twenty twenty four, So six years from now they think that more than half and perhaps
two thirds of the cars on the road are going to be electric. It's simply not going to happen, certainly, not unless they can figure out a way to get two thirds of the cars that are already circulation out of circulation. Yeah. Yeah, Well, when you look at the making the gas more expensive and artificially inflating, and Biden's been working at that very hard from day one, you know, shutting down resources to get stuff there, but
also you know the sanctions that he's done. And when you look at the price of gasoline. Just before you came on, I was talking about how prices have gone up in the three years of Biden on average about eighteen percent across the board, some things more than others. But the thing that went up the most was gasoline prices up by fifty six percent, So it's about
triple what the averages for everything else. And that's by design. That's not an accident, that's not you know, that's that's deliberate action by Biden to make that happen. But David, we're supposed to be really grateful that the gas is down it what is it, fifteen cents overtheless, Yeah, it's
really it really is remarkable with people's memory, it's so short. You know, three years ago, four years ago, gas was sort of about two dollars a gallon something like that, and now we're supposed to be happy that it's only three dollars in twenty or three dollars and forty cents. I put forty dollars worth of gas in my old muscle card everyday, and that was enough to put half a tank into it. Forty dollars wow, eighty bucks to fill the thing up. Wow. Wow. I saw you doing the
peel out with that. Enjoyed that as I remember the day. I remember the day when I was in high school, I went to too many tires doing that. I finally learned my lesson. But now it's not just the tires, it's a gas that you when you do the burnout, you're burning cash in two different ways. So it reminds me of a great movie pre part You remember there's a scene where they're having the funeral and the older guy says to the little boy. You know, they're playing outlawed tunes on outlawed
pipes. Remember that, Yeah, yeah, and I feel that when almost far, Yeah, those are those are going to be outlawed pipes, just like they're outlawing the the people rolling coal and things. You know, did you see that they're coming out what was it? I think it was eBay. They wanted to hit them with massive fines for each and every one of those things that were sold on eBay, you know, for people to put
on their trucks so they can roll coal. You know, I mean, it's it's a phenomenal amount, and nothing is too far or too absurd for these people. Everybody lays down and dies whenever they say it's to save the climate or the environment. And you're talking about cherry picking the inflation numbers. I've seen this from all the way through. That's what climate gate was always about. Climate Gate was about cherry picking your starting points so that you can
get the trend that you want. And you know, because they go back, if you look at the Arctic cores and things like that and really have a legitimate starting point, you can see that the industrial revolution is not affecting the climate anyway whatsoever. So they cherry picket to try to to get the data that they want. But you know, when you're talking about how they
are manipulating this for a particular technology, I think it's interesting. Then the UK they're going to have some para Olympic games and Toyota is going to make three thousand vehicles available for these Paralympic Games that are all going to be zero emission, five hundred of them. One six of them are going to be their hydrogen fuel cell evs, right, so you could have you know, when you talk about and I think this is an interesting thing because it has
a lot of parallels to the pandemic mcguffin. The climate mcguffin is the same way in the sense that not only can you not see the data, not only are playing games so that and all the rest of the stuff and creating a false fear campaign. But it's also that only after they create the fear campaign, there's only one approach that's going to be allowed. And so when you look at this hydrogen versus battery electric vehicle thing, I think that's very
telling because you know, no, we don't have time. We got a race to this solution or we're all going to die, and you can't have the hydrogen fuel cell, You've got to have the battery fuel cell. Of course we know what that's about. It's about creating dependence on the grid. Well, the other shoot that's going to drop is that for now they allow the pretense to stand that these things are zero emissions vehicles, which of course
they're not. Everything has emissions to one to be or another. Particularly you're going to define carbon dioxide ant non reactive gas as an emission point. Is they're letting that they're holding that back for now because it's useful to them for now to have this stalking horse of the EV as the vehicle for getting rid of other vehicles. But I assure you I will make a prediction that if this thing proceeds and is nothing available but electric vehicles, by twenty thirty.
Then all of a sudden they're going to find that there are missions with those things too, and then they're going to start regulating and shutting those things down too, so that again almost nobody except the extremely lead at the very apex of the pyramid are permitted to have personal vehicles. The key to fighting this is to understand that these people's motives are not malicious and to not engage them
on their terms. Everything that they bring out, whether it's the pandemic, whether it's this climate stuff, it's malicious and disingenuous, and you're going to get absolutely nowhere debating them on their terms. You have to attack them at the core of this issue, which is about they are using these things as excuses, as justifications to tyrannize people, to impoverish people, to increase their control over the population. And that's it. That's the bottom line. It's
to shut people up. Just like if you have anything to say about if you raise an objection about the policies of the Israeli government, for example, I'm going to touch the third rail right here. That makes you antis and oh, now you have to cringe because you don't want to be a Nazi. Dude, you don't want to be anti Semitic. You can't do that, you know, that's that's what they want. Or you know, if
you if you raise your fannasitin. You know, I think it's kind of not right to deny people admissioned, to consider them for admission to college on account of their race. Well, that means you're a racist obviously, and you're a member of the Klan, and a lot of people will cringe, and oh, I can't say that publicly, stop it enough. We have to say it, you know, if you know, you know in your hearts you're not a racist, you're not an anti Semite, You're not in
favor of pouring oil into the gutter. Don't let them put that mantle over your shoulders that you're somehow a bad person for questioning them. We have got to start questioning them and demanding answers. And I think you keep part of that, you know, again we get back to the mcguffin, you know, and I keep part of that is too. It makes me cringe when I see people coming out and saying, yeah, but this would actually be
more effective in terms of cutting down CO two. It would actually have less emissions, and then your proposal on everything, it's like, don't fight on their battlefield. Right, the whole thing is a false construct. We've got to get to the root of the lie instead of saying, well, I think you know you're being a little bit too harsh, and we need to have a little bit more time to comply with these things and so forth and
have a debate on that area. We're going to lose that debate if we let set the terms, if we let them create this fantasy world about magic unicorn farts that are going to kill us, all we lose. Right, And so you've got to point out the emperor has no clothes and they have no foundation of this. By the way, you know, Travis, pull up the article there of the wooden version of Tesla's cyber truck. Okay, Now the question is okay because it got Bill Gates wants to go around and
cut down trees. Now, after we had to pay billionaires money to plant trees. Whenever we committed the sin of having emissions with some activity, we would have to pay an indulgence to be able to have that emission or that energy use by having them plant trees. And after they've run this scam for a long time. Now they want to go out and cut down trees and then bury them. And so is Bill Gates going to want to bury this wooden Tesla cyber truck? Well, meanwhile, how many how many millions of
tons of carbon dioxide did the recent launch of the Mega rocket produce? That's okay? Oh yeah, oh yeah absolutely. I think it is kind of funny though, because in a way I've seen people criticize. Uh, you got automotive engineers who design body styles and they said, well, well, this is obviously designed by an amateur because all these panels are dead straight and flat, and that's going to be impossible to get a good fit. It's
going to be really difficult to manufactory. That's why they don't have flat panels on this thing. But you know, if you're going to do it, and would maybe that works to have form it more readily. You know, it's amazing with regard to a cyber truck that they didn't learn the lesson from Delorian. Delorian also tried to make stainless steel bodied vehicles, and you know, the idea was, well, you have a stainless steel body, it won't rust you don't have to painted, which is true. The problem is
stainless steel is extraordinarily difficult to form, particularly in round type forms. You know, it's it's fine to have right angles and things like that, but that's the problem in Tesla has with the cyber truck. You know, it's forty years after the Dolorean, and this still the manufacturing process is necessary to take stainless steal and make a curved fender, let's say, you know, and make tolerances of what people expect the new cars. You're not going to
do that with stainless steel. Yeah, oh yeah, absolutely. And I think that if I remember correctly, I think there was a lot of complaints at the time when the Dorian came out. People were complaining about how difficult it was that showed fingerprints and all this other kind of stuff. It was a real hassle to try to keep this thing looking good because if you touched
it, you got all kinds of fingerprints left on the body there. It's kind of but I think that Elon Musk does admire that he did going doors on one of his vehicles, right, so, you know, going doors, and so he's pulling back bits and pieces of it. I think he maybe you know, saw TV pictures of this thing and never really investigated the
practical aspects of the Deloreans, which I like. I mean that we came here one year and Pigeon Forge they had a convention of Deloreans and it was pretty cool, you're telling me, Yeah, yeah, pretty cool to see all these things. I'd never seen one up close and personal, and they
were all over the place. But you know, I think he's looked at it from afar and tried to incorporate aspects of it, because everybody looks at it and thinks, you know, what a cool innovative thing, and so it's got that sizzle that's there, but maybe not a practical aspect to it. Well, the thing that infuriates me about it. You know, if you were just an entrepreneur like Dolorian and you know, offering this vehicle for sale, fine, the people who want it, let them buy it.
That's that's fine with me. But here we have yet another one of these battery power atrocities for the uber ultra rich. This thing is a six figure vehicle, so once again the average person is having a pie thrown in their
face. You know, this is for the people who are able to afford it, and people like you are going to be driven out of being able to drive cars by these smug, smarmy, virtue signaling elite people who prants and prene and talk about how green they are while they're driving these six figure overpowered, overweight, gratuitously energy consumptive electric vehicles that suck as much energy as a VA muscle cars just a different form and expect you and I to subsidize
it. It's as outrageous as me somehow leveraging the government to make you subsidize the purchase of my trans am and the gas that it burns. It's beyond insufferable. Oh yeah, yeah, this article, it's going around talking about how one percent rich with their private jets and all the rest of the stuff are using or generating as much as CO two or carbon or whatever you want
to come as sixty six percent of the rest of the population. Again, this is going back to it's good to point out their hypocrisy by their own standard of measurement, but it's also important when recover story like this to point out and oh, by the way, nobody should care about how much CO two anybody uses. You know, I said years ago, this is some insight baseball. You remember when the cheating scandal broke with Volkswagen over the emission
certification tests and their TDI engines. Oh yeah, and I talked to it a lot. I pleaded with some people that I know in the company. Guys, you should put some money toward explaining people what's going on here and demand that the government produce evidence of actual harm costs not contest. Oh, you cheated on the certification tests, as if somehow that means somebody was harmed, So what who cares? That's like saying I cheated by not buckling up
for safety when I went out for a drive this morning. You know, I really think one of the keys to solving this problem is when some activists or politician or regulatory bureaucrat comes out with a proposal demands that X, Y
or Z be done. That in the first place, it be established as fact that there is a need for this because there is a harm, actual human beings being harmed, not people's feelings being hurt, you know, not some rule being affronted, but that there is an actual harm, and then whatever the solution is should be proportionate in costs and imposition to whatever the harm
is. It's insane to harm a population of three hundred and thirty million people over a hypothetical that you know, it was a single human being put forward as was there any proof aduced that even one person was harmed by Volkswagen's TDI diesels? And the answer is no, yeah, oh yeah, And how many? How many people have been harmed by denying the access to a vehicle that you could have bought for twenty two thousand dollars that had a seven hundred
mile range and got fifty miles per gallon. That's that's a real harm. We've been denied that all of those great Volkswagen diesels are no longer available because
they'd cheated on emission certification tests. And I remember when that was happening, and you and I talked about this, and I said, look, you know, we've had situations with the pintos or they cut corners and people died, and they said, well, it's going to be easier for us to pay off these people who died than it is for us to make this change.
And it is a clear mercenary calculation that caused people to die and you look at you know, that was a lot of attention drawn to that, but you look at the penalty that they paid, that Ford paid for that, it was nothing compared to what they did to VW. And you look at the airbanks, the Dakada airbags. We talked about that as well. And you know, this is something killed you know, about a dozen people, well actually I think about eighteen or something like that now, and yet
they didn't get that kind of treatment as Volkswagen did. Volkswagen supposedly quote unquote cheated on it. Well, you know, from one standpoint, everybody cheats on this. They adjust the shifting points on the automatic. Yeah, they they mess up your transition, I'm sorry. They tune their vehicles to meet the test. And this happens on time in the car industry. And typically when it happens, when the government finds out about it, what they might
do is, you know, require that the manufacturer makes them change. They never, in the past, not ever, did they arrest and frog Mark frog march an executive in chains before a judge and charge them criminal. This was the first time that ever happened, and it happened for a reason,
and it happened because of the timing. If you go back to twenty fifteen or so, that was when this electric vehicle push really began to get on ahead of steam, and they understood that the TDI diesels that Volkswagen was selling for twenty two to twenty four thousand dollars presented an existential threat to this agenda.
It would have been extraordinarily difficult to try to tell people, Hey, buy a fifty thousand dollars Tesla with a two hundred and eighty mile range that you'll have to sit at a fast charger and wait an hour to get a partial charge back into or you could drive this twenty two thousand dollars Jetta for seven hundred miles and refill the thing in five minutes and be back on board. I mean, nobody's going to do that, I mean in any meaningful
way. So they had to get rid of these sensible, affordable alternatives to the electric vehicle, and Volkswagen was the biggest defender in that regard, and that's why those vehicles had to go oh yeah, yeah. And you look at the way they turned them. It's kind of like when I saw that happening, it reminded me of what happened with Bill Gates, who lied and cheated and stole his way into essentially a monopoly, and they came after him
for anti trust violations, which clearly he had violated those things. And you remember seeing the the him as he's being deposed doing his deposition, and he's rocking back and forth in his chair, you know, and they they you know, they didn't make any major issues with it. But ever since that point in time, Microsoft has been wetted wedded to the surveillance state, to DARPA and all the rest of them. They run NewsGuard and Election Guard and
everything. They run all that through Microsoft. Microsoft is going to be running their Coalition for Content Providence and Authentication, which is going to put an idea on everything that you or I do and allow them to shut it down before it even gets posted. And so you know, they've had they've owned Microsoft because of that. And they did the same thing with Volkswagen. They were
able to put the fear of government in these guys. And now my you know, Volkswagen is out there you know, with a taking the lead and all these ev things, and you know, they dropped all the diesel stuff and then took the lead really in ev stuff. They know how to turn people around. It's amazing how they can do that. Oh they do.
And you know another example, you know, after the near bankruptcy and the actual bankruptcy Ford and General Motors back in nine the government came in and saved the day, rescued them from bankruptcy, provided lots of government money, with lots of government strings. And it's not accidental that after that point General Motors became government motors and did exactly what the government wants and became in fact indistinguishable
from the government. You know, these corporations now used to be sort of a separate thing, and here was the government. They were kind of at loggerheads sometimes and they would fight with each other. Now they're partnered with each other. They're both trying to do the same thing. And we're the targets of the suffert. Yes, you know, I look to see what is happening frequently in the UK because they really are a couple of steps ahead of
us, and we're both going down the same world economum agenda. But they're doing it more rapidly. You know, they're banning cars in many different cities, they've done that. They've got their ultra low emission zones. They even charge if you've got a diesel car. They hit them so much they will put a fee on you even if you park it and you're not driving it.
And so we see all this crazy stuff that's happening there. The Daily Mail had an article that was about twenty four pages long talking about all the different types of speed cameras, kind of giving people heads up warning on it. And they've got these ultraspeed cameras are now being chopped down by vigilantes and so these people are actually going out and sawing down the poll that this thing
is on. These people are they're getting so angry about this. And of course we've seen this with the ul Z, the ultraloy emission zone things that the Sadiq Khan put up to you know, if you come into my area with a car that is not a zero emission car, we're going to charge you like twelve or fifteen dollars a day. And so you had a lot of these people going around, you know, like vigil andes taking this stuff
down. Some of them got caught because they weren't even trying to hide their identity and they've got cameras everywhere, but at least you know they're there. That's at least they're fighting back. That puts me on a list, I guess we're saying that, but that's fine. That's the way I feel. At least these people are fighting back and destroying this. They take the cameras, they take a poll sometimes and they just point it at the sky, you know, and just push it up. They don't destroy it, they
just reposition it so I can't see what's on the ground. Well, one man's vigilantes, another man's freedom flayer, that's right. I mean, what was Robin Hood? You know? They put us, they put our backs to the wall. They leave us essentially no choice, you know, hall Menkin, who I've admired since I was in high school. So that, you know, point comes when you have to spit on your hands and hoist the black flag. You know. There they've effectively turned us into criminals,
so we might as well embrace it and just proceed accordingly. It's awful to have to say that, but it's the truth. You know, you can't honest, decent people can't be honest and decent anymore. You can't function because your honesty and decency will be used against you. And don't let them make you feel bad about doing the right thing because they say it's illegal, you know, because they're trying to use their apparatus to punish you for things that
involve no harm to anybody. These cameras are outrageous. All of this stuff is outrageous and it needs to be pulled out, root and branch and thrown into a bonfire. It's high time. Yeah, yeah, well they did that. The thing was up on a metal pole and they cut it down with an angle grinder and then normally, yeah, it's great. You know, they've got all the equipment and tools. You know, they come out there and they have at it. You know, I sometimes make myself a
cup of coffee and watch those videos to make myself feel better. That's right. They're also removing the ballards that they've set up, you know, for their fifteen minute cities to prohibit you from traveling into certain zones. The people are going out and taking this stuff down, and so I'll tell you,
yeah, go ahead. I was going to say, there's something else I think that's going to happen that's related to this, and you're probably following this as well, the way these insurance companies now are jacking up people's premiums to the point of affordability, you know, whether it's home insurance or car insurance or whatever it is that you're obliged to buy because of government FIAT, because
the government and the insurance companies are in bed together. And I think at a point, a point's going to come where people are going to say, you know, if my choice is to stop driving or to not eat and pay insurance, I think I'm just going to stop having insurance and drive and eat. I'm going to stop paying it. There's going to be mass refusal to go along with this anymore. They're really pushing people to the point where it's no longer just well, this is annoying and I don't like this.
This is becoming an existential question for a lot of people. Just like with cars, if they take away your non electric car, particularly if you live out in the country as I do and you do, they're telling you effectively, you know you're going to be stranded. You're not going to be able to go anywhere because you don't have an ev and an ev is and practical they're not just saying you're not going to have car. They're saying you're not
going to have your house in the country or your suburbs. Even you know, you're pushed to living in some kind of an apartment or whatever inside their fifteen minute freedomcies. This is an existential threat. And I think to understand that, you know they're gonna they're going to come to groups. They're innate desire that most non psychotic people haven't. I'm not looking for a fight. I'm not trying to get into a fight. But if you keep on pushing
me and you keep on hitting me, I'm going to defend myself. Yeah, And where the rubber meets the road is really going to be at the local level, you know, and local and state government. That's where we can stop this stuff. It can become worse as we saw in twenty twenty, or you can make it better at that level. And a good example of this I like to point back to is this pistol brace thing done executive order gun control, Like Trump set the president with the bump stock, and
so then Biden does it with a pistol brace. But of course Trump tried to do that in his administration with a pistol brace as well, started it in twenty nineteen and then ended it in twenty twenty, and then Biden immediately brought it back. But here, the way they handle it here Eric and Tennessee was I talked to a Tennessee state senator and he said that senator nicely,
he said, well, we've got that taken care of. He said, first of all, we pass the law that says that if something is legal here in Tennessee, they can't make it illegal at the federal level, and we're not going to help them to enforce any of this stuff. And then we said, and oh, by the way, pistol braces are legal.
So even before, even while these guys are wrestling with this thing in court challenges back and forth, and let's take it to this level of the court challenge and so forth, they'd already cut this thing off at the you know, where the rubber meets the road, at the local level in this
particular case, at the state level. But you can do that kind of stuff at the local level as well, And so you can have sheriffs that are going to stand in the gap and not going to force, not going to enforce the governor's rules about masks and things like that, or they can get real horsey and they can be worse about it. You know, it makes a big difference. I tell people we got that, we've got the whole political concerns upside down. We need to understand that these people in Washington
are trying to destroy our lives. But the way that we can fight back is really at the local level, don't you think. Oh? I absolutely agree, And you know that's what I'm about to say with what Graujow Marx once said about not wanting to join a club that would have him as a member, And what I mean by that is I am loath to consider running for office, but I've actually been thinking about running locally for school board and on the motto vote for Eric and he'll leave you alone and won't take your
money. And this is, as you say, this is the sort of thing that we need to do minimally, even if someone like myself stands little if any chance of actually getting elected. By making the run, you at least get the alternative point of view out there. And it's no longer this uniparty dynamic between the red sheep and the blue sheep, and they're both in agreement on the fundamentals. Let's have something different for a change. Let's actually
talk about not less taxes, but no taxes. Let's talk about leaving people alone period, not only leaving them alone here, but interfering with them there. Because you're on this side of the political how and you think it's okay to interfere with people in this way, but the other side so it's okay to do it that way. Let's get away from that. Let's get back to just voluntarism. And if somebody is not causing harm to anybody, leave them be. Yeah, you know, this is this is ultimately the long
term goal. And if I have to run for school board, I'll do it. That's my contribution if I you know, such as it is, well, yeah, and you might be able to actually participate and they might have still have debates there, you know, when you look at what is happening with the debates. And I was involved with third parties and tried to you know, we had ballot access for the LP that we would get on,
you know in North Carolina. But even after all this, you know, it's like Sisyphis, you know, rolling the rock up the hill every every two to four years. But even after you get on the ballot, they would find some way to keep you out of the debate. They didn't want to have the debate. And now we see this happening with Trump, we see it happening with Biden. They don't want to debate anybody. It's pretty obvious why Trump and Biden don't want to debate anybody, because it's not
they don't want to make any of this stuff about any issues. It's got to be about them personally. And you know, so you know the other guy. You hate that other guy, don't you. Well, you don't hate me as much as you hate him. But let's talk about the issues because really, on the existential issues, there isn't any difference between them, So why have a debate about that when that would just show that they're on the same page, absolutely exactly. And I think we can have a great
deal of impact and influence at the local level. We take back our communities, and if we take back our communities, we take back our states, and we can take back our country in time. You know, the authoritarians, the authoritarians didn't succeed overnight. It took them generations to make the games that they made and it may take us that amount of time to make them
back. I agree, it's and we have to understand and the reason that we talk about what is happening globally while we talk about what is happening in Washington isn't because we can do anything about it. We can't. As a matter of fact, I had the guy who wrote the book the Tuttle Twins, you know series, and he's out of out of Utah, and he said he helped to he was in politics and he helped to get my elected.
He says, I, you know, criticize him for what he's done or hasn't done, because you really can't get much done even as a senator. And he said, I found that we've spent all of our effort trying to fix things in Washington where we have the least amount of impact and leverage, and then we focus on the presidency where we have absolutely zero impact on
that. But he said he started getting involved in state politics and he was able to get a whole bunch of different laws passed that we're going to make things freer for people in Utah. So that's why you know, when we look at that, it's important to keep that in mind and to understand, as the liberals have always said, I've always all my life, you know, Tip O'Neil and other Democrats said, all politics is local. That's where
it really happens. And you would hear the people pushing for world government would always say, think globally, act locally. All the Greenies and all the rest of the Communis would all do this, and that's what we need. We need to understand what their global agenda is. We need to understand the directions that they're coming after us, what the endgame is with all this stuff, and then we need to fight them locally. That's that's where we've got
to fight them locally, each and every one of these agendas. We can even fight them at at a lower level. That's something exactly the word excuse me, I've had too much coffee this morning. But at the family level. I had the discussion earlier today with a friend of mine who was telling me about he's training his daughter how to grive, helping her room how to drive, and he encouraged her to use her eyes and her brain rather than
be a mindless automaton that just follows the rules. So at a red light. If it's safe to go, it's okay to go, And if the law says don't go, it's still safe to go. Theyrrespectable with the law. In fact, it's safer because if you become a rule following automaton, you might decide, well, the light screen, I can go, as opposed to looking to see whether somebody's about to run that light and run right. Use your brain. Learn to think, you know, it's empowering.
And the more people that are that are that are taught to think, the more empowered they become, the less fearfully come become. This is really important. You know that these authoritarians depend on They want you to think that, oh my gosh, I have to wait to be told what to do by somebody who knows what to do by an authority figure, as opposed to, you know, let's evaluate the facts, look at what's going on, what's the situation, and let's decide what the right and prove and course of action
is on our own, use our own judgment. We do that, and we find that we have less and less need for these authoritarian know it all busy bodies. Yeah, oh absolutely, it's interesting. You know, to go to foreign countries, especially third world countries, but even you know, some places like France where you look at roundabouts and they don't have lanes define and you know, you look at the Arch of Triumph and everything, and
all these people are zipping around there and there's no lanes. Everybody's got to be on the lookout for what they're going to do, you know. And and if you go back and you look at old videos of let's say the nineteen forties or something like that, you know, in La and there's no lanes anywhere. Everybody's just kind of doing their own thing, kind of like it still is in France. In some places and other things like that.
We we have these little lanes and lines and lights that are set up and signs that are set up, and we think that if we follow this precisely that we're going to be safe, when in reality we're not. You know, if you didn't have these, my dad got t boned and would have been seriously injured, except you didn't have his seat belt on. That's a bench seat Cadillac in a total of the Cadillac came in on the driver's side,
knocked him across the car. Fortunately he wasn't trapped in there. But you know it was somebody who ran a stop sign at a high speed. And you know, some back roads and anything. Well, imagine if you didn't have stop signs anywhere, and every time you saw an intersection there, you would like you be on the lookout for somebody that's coming your way instead of thinking I've got the right of way. You know. So there's a passage of this too that relates, and that is the incipity of it.
You know, they use these terms like assistance that we were talking about earlier, and that's insulting. You know, I don't need assistance. I'm confident I can handle things. It's as if somebody's perfectly capable of walking and they present you with a walker or a wheelchair because you're in need of assistance supposed to being an able bodied person who can walk. You know, I'm a person who's perfectly confident to brive a vehicle. I don't need steering assists,
I don't need break assists and all these other forms of assistant. Stop trying to parent me, Stop treating me as if I'm an idiot. Yeah I can I deal with these things on my own. Yeah. Yeah. When we look at what is happening too. You know, there's the deliberate neglect
of our real infrastructure. An example of this and I don't know what the figure is here in the United States, but they said in the UK, four hundred and fifty one people have been seriously injured or killed by incidents involving potholes and just a period from twenty eighteen to twenty twenty two because they don't fix these things, right. I mean, you see videos even Arnold Schwarzenegger,
who I can't stand any of his politics. You know, he's going out there virtually signally because it's like, Okay, I've had enough of this. We're going to fix the pothole ourselves. And you know, you see these vigilanti pothole fixers from time time. Kind of reminds me of Brazil, where you know, Robert taner A is the guy going and fixing the air conditioning things because nobody can get the government doesn't got a monopoly to actually do
it. So people go out there and fix this stuff and the government will get very upset in places like California if you go out and you've patched the road yourself, you know, and there's there's something about that that that we should talk about these electric vehicles because of their weight. Oh yeah, that popole problem even worse. A typical EV weighs a small one weighs about forty five hundred pounds, and some of the trucks weighs six thousand pounds and more.
So you can imagine the effect on the road over time if lots of these vehicles are out there pounding on those roads. And we're all going to pay for that in the form of these these gaping potholes that will swallow your entire car all full. Yeah, it's yeah, they're gonna have to. They're talking about redesigning, having to redesign the parking garages as well because so much more weight. They didn't design it for that, right. It truly
is amazing, and you know, but they don't care. It's full speed forward. We don't care. We're going to do this at warp speed. It's always as I said the mcguffin, you've got this crisis. You've got to act now. There is no time to get it right or to test it to see if it works. We've got to go with this technology or this injection, and we're all going to die and just shut up. And
if you're in the way, you're a problem, you're a terrorist. We see these rolling out over and over again, even when the evidence is to the contrary. You know, if we assume that there is a climate crisis, let's just for the sake of discussion, assume there's a climate crisis and it's caused by motor vehicles and by carbon dioxide emissions. Well, if that's the case, then why are they pushing or why are they allowing I should
say, these gratuitously energy consumptive six thousand pounds evs. Wouldn't you think if there's a crisis, we're all going to die, there's a crisis, that the only allowable evs would be minimalist EV's, the most basic, lightest, most energy efficient, least power consumptive vehicles, just whatever was minimally necessary to transport you from A to B. And the reason that they don't do that, of course, is because the affluent virtue signalers would never want to be
caught dead driving a car like that. If they want to go around there in their lure proceed ultra exotic, ultra luxurious electric car, they don't want to drive around in the electric equivalent of a Soviet era travant. You know, it just gives the lie to all of this nonsense. If there were a crisis, this would not be what's happening. So we know that their
motives are disingenuous, dishonest, and malicious. And we know that, you know, these are going to be the cars that the stakeholders will drive, that they the private public partnership will drive, and and so you know they're they're they're they're setting this up so that only the elite will have cars. That's another part of it as well, as you're pointing out they don't want
to drive it themselves, but they don't want you to have anything. But they're going to have their cars, just like they'll have their private jets and their yachts and all the rest of this stuff. It is amazing. And you know, we talk about people even being killed by potholes. Yesterday they had an article from the World Economic Forum talking about a day of remembrance for
road traffic victims. And then as if that's not enough, because they've got the Vision zero that they've been using as part of their twenty thirty agenda and smart city agenda. We're going to have zero traffic deaths, and of course the way you're going to do that's have zero cars and or they're going to be traveling at zero speed, which means you're not going to drive them anywhere.
But you know, their vision zero thing. But then they take it to this direction, Eric, they say how a global road safety crisis harms women's rights. Of course it does. Years ago they had National lampoon had a joke headline and it said end of the world tomorrow. Women are minority's hardest hit. Yeah, this headline is literally saying the same thing. First of all, you know, it's a day of remembrance to go to war with cars because they're killing everybody, and then it's killing women worse. It's
a little too early to drink. Is there's never any end through? Well, you know what else have you got at Eric Peters Auto's dot com. Well, let's we talked about the safety and the fact that it's not actually saving you any money. You also talked about now you talked about the end of the there's one vehicle that's left, the last six cylinder that's standing. You've got to that. Yeah, yeah, yeah, And you know, that gets into what we've been talking about. It the way the regulations are
being used to force the V six engine off of the market. But there's something else. If I could, I'd like to just ship a little bit, I know, find to short that that ties into this electric vehicle thing, which is the CDD thing, CBDC thing. Yes, you can't pay cash at a fast charger, you know. This is something that people should be aware of. In order to use these fast chargers, you have to
use digital money. Typically, you have to have a credit card that's tied to an app on your phone, and if you don't have that, you won't be able to charge your ev Very interesting and so slip the way.
At many supermarkets and other kinds of retail establishments, they have windowed down the cash registers that accept cash to almost mil and they're trying to control and push you into using this digitized electronic currency, you know, And that's telling and again it's another mechanism by which the electric vehicle is going to control you.
You know, they're going to know whether you bought electricity, how much electricity you bought, and more to the point, whether you're allowed to buy electricity at these these fast chargers. That's really important for people to understand that. And it's always been about control. It's always been about that we've got to have you can again, you can't have a hydrogen electric vehicle. We're not
going to work on that technology. We're going to say that's not allowed because we've got to have something that's going to only be chargeable off of the centrally controlled electric grid. And now we're going to have the centrally controlled finances that are out there, and people are getting banned by the thousand is now in the UK. That's another place where they are slightly ahead of us is happening here. I mean I got kicked off of PayPal on Venmo after five months
on there. But you know they're doing the de banking thing and they're ramping that up. It is an ever tightening news. That's why we have to work on how we can get outside of their system that they plan. And you have to know what system they're planning and how they're going to shut things down so that you can make plans to exist. Otherwise, you know, if they're going to shut down all your banking system, well then you need to figure out how you're going to operate on a cash or gold or silver
basis with people. That's the key thing to understand where they're coming at you. Yeah, well, and one thing that you can do right now, and it may seem fascile on the individual level, but use cash insists on it. Yes, yes, if a merchant will not accept other than cash, then don't do business with that business. That's right. And the more of us do it, just as more of us were shoes to wear the
mask and didn't take the job. That can have effect as it scales, but you know it starts with you and me and every other person out there. Stop being gulled by the convenience of electronic transactions. I understand it's a little more difficult to spill out a piece of paper from your wallet and for the coins supposed to swipe in your card, but it's really important to not let them get control of our money. If they get control of our money,
they control everything. And it will actually help you keep you from going into credit card debt too. Absolutely, if you have one hundred dollars in wallet, that's all you can spend. You can't spend more than that. If you have a card, you can't outspend. What's your ability what you're able to pay? You know. Pierce Corbin I interviewed him. He was in the UK and he had that video that went viral where he goes into
all these and they said, no, we're on cash list now. And so to make a point, you know, he gets some strawberries and leaves the cash there and they say, hey, do that you know, and they call the police on him. There wasn't He's paid them, you know. And I don't know what the situation is in the UK, but here in the US, if you really got to have something, or you really want to make the point, it says on their legal tender for all you know things, and so you got the law on your side with that.
If you really want to press it with these people, you can. And you know, if you got the cash money, they got to take the cash money. That's that's what it's really about. We always great talking to you, Eric ep autos dot com to find out what is happening with mobility and that is tied to our liberty in such an important way. And before we close, let me think, Angry Tiger, good to see you there. Nights of the storm and of course, Tiger and Snake Report, thank
you very much for the tip. And Dystopian Dissident thank you as well. He thanks us, but we thank you, thank you so much for that, and thank you Eric. Well see you. Thanks, take care. Okay, let me tell you the David Night Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Knight Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something
else. You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at the Davidknightshow dot com. That's a website. Elvis and the Sweet Sounds of Motown find them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com.