Fri Episode #2196: Future Regimes Will Inherit Total Control Thanks To Trump

what is happening financially. We're also going to have an interview from thirteen years ago where I talked to doctor Noel Sharky. He is a computer science, robotics and artificial intelligence expert from the UK and he's pretty well known on TV there because of robot Wars and other things that he was a consultant to and I think was

on screen with it. But when we talked to him about efforts to try to stop economous killing robots because they're on their way and that's what warpete wants mora lethality regardless of who's in control.

It's very concerning when you look at the traps that have been laid for everybody in the state by state and the UCC code, as I pointed out yesterday, the great taking that is right there waiting for them to take everything from us. Meanwhile, we have as I pointed out last week was last Friday was a premier of the Milania film. And my comment yesterday was I thought it was kind of interesting all of these you know,

big name Christian people. Of course say big name, I mean Robert Jeffries and Dallas has got a huge megachurch, but he's always done whatever needs me done to get a seat at the table with Trump. But I also saw people that I knew going to see Millennia, and it's like, out in the world, could you go to see that if you know anything at all about what's going on with the Epstein files, And how can you miss that? How could you miss her involvement with all

of that stuff as well as Donald trump'suff? You know, it's kind of interesting. There was a movie theater in Portland and they put up the guy said, well, we decided we would carry the film that was last week. We decided to carry the film because when you look at the what was available out there in terms of films that we could put in the theater, it was an absolute desert, he said, So we decided we'd put

it up. And so to tease the movie in Portland, where they know people are not going to care much about Millennia, they put up on the billboard they said, does Millenia Wear Prada? Find out on Friday, of course, you know, referring to the movie title The Double Wears Prada. And so they got there. The film pulled by Amazon because of that, But look, we all know what was really going on with that film. We know it was a naked grift that was going on from Jeff Bezos

to the Trumps. She got twenty eight million dollars for that. As I pointed out last week, you look at the box office numbers, they were oh amazing box office numbers. They spent thirty five million dollars promoting it, spent forty million dollars making it. Of that forty million dollars, twenty eight of it went to Milania. Don't tell me this isn't some play to play garbage that's happening with the Trumps.

That happens with them all the time. And when you look at the kind of budgets you typically see the documentary, even if you take out her twenty eight million dollar cut, you're still talking about a twelve million dollar budget for a documentary, the kind of thing that we used to shoot all the time, just three guys and with cameras and anyway, it was really absurd how they threw money at this thing. And of course, the success of it has nothing to do with the whether or not it's

a good film or not. People are going to go to see it because they like Trump, and that's the bottom line. People are not going to go see it because they don't like Trump. And so it's not really about the film itself. Although you had Matt Labasche say is this the worst film of all time? And he says, well, I can't say that it is because I haven't seen every single film, because I've seen a lot of awful

films and the names a bunch of them. And he said, and of all the films that I personally have seen in my life, this is absolutely the worst. So the UAE royal investment and Trump crypto firm preceded major us AI chip access. Yeah, another pay to play. This is just the same type of thing that Bezos did. Right, So, just days before Trump's inauguration, a secret foreign investment quietly

reshaped the ownership of this family's new cryptocurrency venture. The buyer was tied to one of the most powerful figures in the UAE. Within months, that same figures country secured sweeping access to advanced American artificial intelligence chips. And of course this guy is known as the spy Chik because he is involved with technology and espionage and that type of thing. So, I mean, nothing to see here, right. The arrangement detailed in a Wall Street Joureral investigation is

fueling renewed accusations that Trump is monetizing the presidency. Folks, who's no questioning about that. It really is nakedly exploited. As they put in here, he has never have we seen a person president who has so nakedly exploited his position on such a scale. And again, the family fortune has balloon by four billion dollars in twenty twenty five. That number excludes profits from the family's pre existing businesses. As a matter of fact, people want to investigate ilhan

Omar or AOC, Yeah, absolutely should investigate them. What about Trump? How could you not look at this and say something is wrong? I mean, we talked about Obama. How this guy who had never really had a job. He was a community organizer, then he became a politician. He had various political offices and everything, none of them paid that well.

How did he wind up being a multimillionaire? How does Trump somebody who's net worth was probably about three or four billion dollars according not according to Trump, but according to the people who actually investigate these things. How could he double his net worth in just one year the

first year in office of the second term. Four days before Trump's inauguration last year, lieutenants to Abu Dhabi's royal secretly signed a deal with the Trump family to purchase a forty nine percent stake and the fledgling cryptocurrency adventure for half a billion dollars. The deal involved World Liberty Financial, the president's own crypto venture. It was co founded with his three sons and with Steve and Zach Whitcoff So. According to The Wall Street Journal, the previously unreported deal

was signed by Eric, one of the President's sons. Under the agreement, the buyers would pay half upfront, steering one hundred and seven million dollars to Trump family entities. Now what did they get for it? Well, at least thirty one million was slated to flow to entities affiliated with the family of Steve whitcof two weeks earlier, had been named US Envoy to the Middle East. Another thirty one million,

And again does that ring any bells? I mean, here's a guy who's going to be the envoy to these people, and they're buying influence with him, giving him thirty one million dollars before he takes the office. Another thirty one million went to an entity tied to co founders Zach Folkman and Chase Herrow. Sheik tat Noon backed the investment. The Wall Street Journal describes him as the spy Sheik.

They said, that's his nickname. Brother to the UAE's president, the government's national security advisor, as well as the leader of the old rich country's largest wealth fund. He oversees more than one point three trillion dollar empire funded by his personal fortune and by state money, which again, you know, they just mix those two together, just like China, just like the Trump regime. So it spans from fish farms to AI to surveillance, making him one of the most

powerful single investors in the world. The deal marks something unprecedented in American politics for foreign government official taking a major ownership stake in an incoming president's company. At the center of the controverty he's not just a business deal, but access to technology that Washington treats as strategically sensitive. The previous administration was unwilling to share it with the UAE.

As a matter of fact, to Noon's efforts to get AI hardware had been largely stymied over fears that he was going to pass it along to China and his company, the AI firm G four two had stoked alarm among intelligence officials and lawmakers over its close ties to Huawei and other Chinese firms. Remember and Trump's first term, they wanted to roll out five G and other things in six G. Perhaps they wanted to make sure that Huawei was not going to be involved in any of that.

And they said, well, if they are so paranoid about the Chinese having the ability to surveil US, what do you think that tells you about the US government. Don't you think that there also are aware of the technology to surveil people with the networks that they're rolling out. Of course they are. They just want to be the ones who are doing the surveillance. But Whahwei was what they were focused on to stop. And so here you have a guy who is one handshake away from Huawei.

Trump's election opened the door for him, right to the Wall Street Journal. After the election, to Noon met multiple times of Trump, Steve Whitkoff, and other US officials. During a March White House visit, the sheikh told officials that he was eager to work with US on AI and on other issues. G four to two celebrated the shift, saying it accelerated projects including stargate UAE. Isn't it interesting this guy Again, he doesn't just do the same types

of things as Trump. You know, we're going to merge our corporate and government fortunes together and I'm going to profit off of this. They also both had this stargate thing. Remember that was the thing that Trump did. I think it was his first day back in the Oval office. Oracle Cisco and Nvidia, the SoftBank group, and Trump was talking about AI plus mRNA technology And so again America's got a stargate project. They're talking about a five hundred

billion dollar AI infrastructure project. UA is going to do the same thing, and we're going to give them to Chips whish they will then turn over to China. Most likely, what wasn't publicly known was that to Noon's emissaries had signed the deal to purchase forty nine percent of World Liberty that January. So, yeah, don't need to look at this.

I'm sure there's nothing there, don't you think. Well, this is report from New American They said they concluded that the World Liberty Financial operates in a legally permissible but ethically questionable space. This sure looks like a violation of the Born in monument's clause and more of the point, it looks like a bribe, said Washington University law professor. The transaction, she said, should be a five alarm fire about the federal government being for sale. Well, that pretty

much is everything about the Trump administration. Meanwhile, we had ran Paul come out and push back against Trump. He's done this now on both the Venezuela extra judicial killings that are going on there as well as the out of control ice, as well as now this statement from Trump that he's going to nationalize the elections. Ran Paul said, that's not what the constitution says. And so you had Caroline Lovett come out. She was asked you know about

this canceling elections. Here's what she had to say.

and I'm not going to answer you a question. I'm going to answer your question quote unquote with an attack on you personally. That's exactly the same play as Caroline Lovett. Are they being coached by the cricket at the top. This is the Trump regimes tactic. We don't respond to questions, We attack you personally if you ask us a question. And so, why is he joking about not having an election?

Why would that even be funny? It's not funny. It's especially not funny when you've got somebody who runs roughshod over the Constitution and the rule of law. Who has no respect for that whatsoever. And then we got that crook Bannon, who is pardoned by the other crook. Trump is out there saying no, no, we really are going to run him for a third time. We're going to manipulate the Constitution. There's things we can do, and on and on. I'm so sick and tired of these people

who fought this stuff. And that's why when Rampaul says, well, you know, we got something called a constitution, and he says, that's not what the Constitution says about elections. He said the US Supreme Court limits states in some ways, such as barring them from setting different rules for some issues, including things like term limits, but he said the Constitution gives states the powers to determine the time, the place,

and the manner of elections. The Supreme Court, he said, did rule that, for example, Washington State can't set term limits on federal officials if Georgia doesn't, it has to be a uniform election law. But as far as the time, place, and manner of elections, that under the Constitution is a state activity. So I'm not for nationalizing it, he said. And again, when we look at how does Trump want

to nationalize it? Well, he wants to, And again Bannon was all excited about having ice show up at the polls. You don't need to have ice at the polls. If you want to do ID, you can do ID. You don't have to have these intimidating thugs and their camouflage and their body armor and their fully automatic weapons pointed at you. What's that about.

the election. See how that works. If you're doing something because of principle, because of the constitution, because of the rule of law, or because of ethics and morality or something, it doesn't matter who is in office, you oppose it both times, and if you are going to act differently based on who is in office, that's how we get people like Mike Johnson that are there. So again, you know, Trump has frequently and absurdly claimed that he lost Minnesota

because the smalies showed up and voted folks. Not even Ronald Reagan could carry Minnesota. He won forty nine states, places like Hawaii, in California and New York when he ran. But even Ronald Reagan couldn't win Minnesota. He didn't lose it by much. He only lost it by two or three thousand votes, I think. But even Ronald Reagan couldn't Cary. There is absolutely no way that Trump would have won in Minnesota. But what is his response? Oh, okay, well,

we got all these Somalis who were brought in. Yeah, they were brought in. They didn't cross the border, they were brought in as part of the refugee program. We had a six billion dollar budget for that last year. In the previous years. Trump and the Republicans wont to increase at two five by another five billion, So he's almost going to double it. It's an eighty percent increase. Why would you do that. If you say the Somalis are the problem, well, because the real problem is Trump,

who is trying to create conflict unnecessarily. That's what this is all truly about. And I'm very suspicious really about national involvement in IDs for elections. Again, that is a state issue. We've had national involvement for ID in terms of stopping it, prohibiting it, saying, well, you can look for picture ID, just like you would have to do if you even cashed a check at the grocery store.

You can require a picture ID. But if you're one of these southern states, because we've had these gem crow laws in the past, We're not going to allow you to do that. We're going to say somehow that is racist to do it, patently absurd, And it is federal involvement in the time, the place, and the manner of the election, and the federal government should get out of that. But out of that. But the issue is, and I've

talked about this many times. You look at North Carolina for example, in the twenty twelve election, I was already in Texas. My brother in law was back in North Carolina. He had a friend. When you went in to vote, you would just give them a name and address, and they had these big computer print outs and they would go through and find your name and your address, and that was all that was required. You just need to go in with an aim and address. And they didn't

know who you were. And they kept saying, well, we're not having any voter fraud, because that is like, oh, really, you're not. And so he had a friend who said I went to vote, gave him my name and my address. They looked it up and said, you've already voted. He says, no, I haven't. I was on election day. He said no I haven't. I said, yeah, you have. And this other person here at your name address, same last name, same address, has already voted as well. He said, that's my mother.

She's been dead for a while. And so while that is happening, the Democrats in North Carolina would say, oh, there's no cheating going on this. I said, he's got to go public with his story, and he said no, he doesn't want to get involved with it. But North Carolina had one of the longest and still does I think perhaps the longest voting period. It was one of the longest, and so you could just go anywhere you want and just give him a name and address and you

could vote and then mark it down. Is that's done? So yeah, we do need to have some ID. My concern, however, is when the federal government gets involved in it. It was a federal goal want to do when it's got ID, right, it's always looking for some excuse to have a national ID, a biometric ID. Look at what TSA is doing, and look at even some of the other Republican areas. You know, we've got Republican states like in Florida, they said we're

going to have mandatory everify. Well, I'm going to get the federal government to say that I can have a job. I got to be vetted by the federal government. How easy is it going to be for them to say, well, we don't like as politics, you can't have a job, or we're going to get rid of anonymity on the

internet because we've got kids who are going to porn sites. Well, there's always different ways, different things that we could do to solve these different problems, but their solution is always a federal national ID, a biometric idea, you name it, things like that. So I'm suspicious about what the Trump regime, which is head over heels and love with surveillance and artificial intelligence. Very concerned about anything that they would do

with the election. Just get the government, the federal government, out of the local elections. They, under the constitution don't have the right to say anything about the manner of the place or the time of the elections. So let the states have photo ID in order to vote and they can handle it themselves. Rand said, the Republicans should say we want to take over. I'm sorry this is a Trump saying it. The Republicans should say we want

to take over. We should take over the voting, the voting and at least as many as fifteen places Republicans oughten nationalize the voting, said Trump. Well. Those statements received pushback from a lot of high profile Republicans, not just Ran Paul, also the Senate Majority leader John Thune. Pushback, he told reporters that voters should be required to show ID to prove their citizens, but he does not support

the federal government seizing the power to run elections. He says, I'm supportive of only citizens voting and showing idea p places, but I'm not in favor of federalizing elections. So no, that's a constitutional issue. I'm a big believer in decentralized and distributed power, said the senator. I think it's harder to hack fifty election systems than it is to hack one. In my view, at least, that's always a system that has worked pretty well. Perhaps that's one of the reasons

why Trump wants to nationalize it. If you've got one central location, it makes it a lot easier to rig the election. That's a pragmatic reason why we should not be doing it. But of course Trump and the people around him. I've never seen such open naked corruption in terms of self enrichment by a politician, not just the present, by any politician. And I've never seen such open naked contempt for the constitution and the rule of law as the Trump regime has well, and the whole.

tax increase that happened under FDR. So he has added these new taxes, and he hasn't done anything to eliminate the income tax, and these small changes that he's made in the income tax code are wiped out by the

tax increases that he's had with the tariffs. As I pointed out, if you adjusted for inflation, even adjusted for inflation, I know, we're talking about dollars that are not, you know, the same as they were in nineteen thirty three, But even when you adjust it for the devaluation of the dollar, it's three times as much as what FDR added in terms of taxes. But he likes to present himself as a tax cutter, just like he a tax country after

country and tries to present himself as the peace president. So, according to Trump, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Fry endorsed a very serious violation of law last week when Fry said Minneapolis does not and will not enforce federal immigration law. But it is Trump whose understanding of the law is seriously impaired, says reason because of the non Common Daring Act, not Act, but the principle that has been established. You know, it's really the nullification principle that has been there all along.

There was a Supreme Court case, remember the one that we talked that Sheriff Mack was involved in. It based on the Brady Bill, and that established with the Supreme Court back in nineteen ninety seven, the non commondeering principle that you cannot force local and state law enforcement. You can't not just law enforcement, but you can't force them to enforce federal law in any way, shape or form. And so guess who wrote that decision. The conservative legal

hero Antonin Scalia. So there you go. I'm going to argue with Scalia. Of course, every time I think about Scalia, and now I think about the pillow over the head thing at the Cibolo Creek ranch. I was thinking about that when I saw the Zarro ranch. That was that was one thing that I have seen that I cannot unsee what was going on at that ranch. How strange everything. And I said, I didn't see anything happen. It's just the really, really bizarre aspect of that ranch was unbelievable

and very occultic. Anyway, the continuing silence from the Supreme Court on these terrafts has led to worrying speculation among some of the president's critics. The longer it takes the Court's terroist's decision to come out, the better it is for the White House. And I said this from the very beginning, when Trump was saying, well, it's going to be a real mess if you try to undo what we've done, so you just better leave it alone. Right, That's not an argument, that's not a legal argument. He

doesn't have a real emergency. And even if he had a real emergency, the way that he's done this is still not called for in the law. This is just a repudiation, a prevarication, a usurpation. And so now he's trying to say that you need to leave this in because it's going to be too difficult to undo it.

And as they point out in this thing that what should have happened since this is being discussed, they should have said, well, we're going to put a moratorium on the collection of tariffs, but instead they allowed the government to continue to collect the teriffs. And when you look at the questioning, it was pretty clear that the justices understood that this is

a tax, that tariffs are always taxes. And yet the fact that they couldn't come to an immediate decision is very troubling because it says that, I think, in my opinion, some pressure is being put on it. If you remember Roberts, everybody believed that the Obama Care stuff was going to be shut down by the Supreme Court, and the argument that they wanted to put forward was not that this was some new usurped federal power, but this was in

fact a tax or something, you know. So he bought into that argument, and then he wrote the opinion to shut down Obamacare, and then he wrote the opinion to allow it. So he kind of did a complete one to eighty. The same guy wrote both the dissenting opinion and the concurring opinion in the case, which tells me that somebody got to him at the very last minute. Away. Trump claims that tariffs have brought America back. Here are three things that he got wrong. This is from Reason

as well. Number one, the trade deficit I guess we'd call this three blind lies. Three blind lies. So the number one lie is the trade deficit. He claims that it has slashed our monthly trade deficit by seventy seven percent, but the Census Bureau reported last week that the trade deficit actually increased, not decreased, by nearly thirty seven percent

in November. Through the first eleven months of twenty twenty five, the trade deficit was four percent higher than it had been in twenty twenty four, the opposite of what Trump is claiming. But of course part of this is because the tariffs actually did not get started when Trump announced them. There was a delay in them, and then even as there was a delay, he kept adjusting the rates down and that type of thing. So, as they point out,

the other lie is who pays the tear tariffs? By number two, Trump wrote in his op ed piece on the Wall Street Journal that foreign producers and middlemen are paying at least eighty percent of the tariff costs. In fact, the paper that he cited concludes that quote tariffs led

to both rapid and gradual retail price increases. The study that whoever wrote this for Trump, the study that they're referenced by the Harvard Business School found that the quote prices began rising within days of the March announcements and continued to increase steadily over subsequent months. They also said imported goods rose roughly twice as much as domestic goods

relative to pre tariff trinsity. Get that, so we've had inflation of domestically produced things, and we've had even with that inflation, we've had imported goods go up by twice that amount. And as we talked about this before, when people say, oh, look, we haven't seen a huge difference in this kind of stuff yet. In the past, when tariffs have been applied, they have been slow to be passed on because the first instinct of the businesses is

going to be to try to not raise prices. That's the competitive advantage, of course, try to compete on price. But then after a while, what they realize is that they can't compete on price. They can't swallow if they get hit with a tariffs it's ten or twenty percent or something they have to pass out on eventually because they don't operate most businesses don't operate on a profit margin that's going to allow them to absorb those types of costs, they have to be passed on the consumer.

That's why the minimum wage increases that are mandated by Democrats are inflationary. They have to be passed on in prices. And that's why corporate income tax we've always understood. I thought as conservatives that you don't tax corporations. When you tax corporations, they pass that on. It always works that way. And so for imported goods are up nine point seven percent from their pre tariff trends, while domestic prices are

up four and a half percent. Those increases have added an next estimated one percent point to inflation as measured by the consumer price indings, and it always lags. It's going to get worse. So the next time Trump is complaining that the Federal Reserve won't lower interest rates, remember that the main reason the Central Bank is keeping interest rates higher is that inflation is still over two percent. But it would be significantly lower if not for Trump's

tariffs and then the third lie economic collapse. He said in his op ed piece. When I imposed historic tariffs on nearly all foreign countries last April, the critics said my policies would cause a global economic meltdown. He said that meltdown didn't occur, So that must prove that the president was right and his opponent's wrong. Well, this is not a gotcha moment that the president seems to believe.

It is. Reason says Trump repeatedly back down and eased tariff threats in the face of negative shocks from both the stock market and the bond market. The Liberation Day tariffs announced on April the second, were postponed a week later after a huge stock market sell off, and those were later imposed at a lower rate. A threatened one hundred and thirty percent tariff on Chinese goods never materialized. No wonder Taco Trump always chickens out entered the political

and financial lexicon last year. Yale's Yale Budget Labs data shows that Trump raised the average US tariff rate from less than three percent to more than twenty five percent, but those rates declined in the second half of the year and settled at around seventeen percent. That's still very high, but not as high as it could have been, so it makes sense that the consequences were less severe and delayed. Of course, as well, so if the bar for success

is I didn't crash the global economy. Congratulations, I guess he says, there's not. Really, it's not something to brag about, and it certainly doesn't excuse Trump from the economic damage that is lower, less extreme tariffs have done. And again, the levels of the tariffs are not nearly as damaging no matter what they are as is on again, off again, constantly changing chaotic environment that keeps people who are in business from being able to know what the costs are

going to be from one day to the next. Tariffs are effectively a wealth transfer mechanism. It takes money from consumers and businesses and it gives it to preferred businesses, right to help protect them. No wonder he loves terrafts because it really is kind of his business model. Right, I'm going to reward my friends crony capitalism and of

course punish his enemies that he hates. So yeah, and Trump's case, the sectors of the economy that are supposed to benefiting from the tariffs, manufacturing and other forms of industrial production, are not even realizing those benefits. It's because higher prices on raw materials make it more difficult to manufacture things. For example, American businesses are now paying much higher prices for aluminum than manufacturer is elsewhere in the world.

That's a good way to discourage manufacturing in America, not to promote it. Trump is clearly unwilling and unable to understand these trade offs. It's hopeless to believe that he'll ever change his mind. It's really up to others to stop him. Not going to be anybody in his immediate circle that's going to stop him for anything, is it. And of course then we have the in terms of Trump's contempt for the rule of law and the constitution.

When the Trump administration went to the Federal District Court, Judge Richard Leon expressed shock. The judge expressed shock on Tuesday that the Trump so called Justice Department was asking him to break new First Amendment ground. We're going to punish Mark Kelly because of what he said, you know, and what did he say that was so offensive? That's the amazing thing about this. Just go back to the very beginning, you know, And it was a comment that

Lance had. He said, why don't they just say we're not giving any illegal orders? Instead they said, how dare you say to people to not follow illegal orders? We're going to come after you for saying that. Why didn't they want to just defend it by saying, well, our orders are not illegal. And shame on Mark Kelly and the other senator who has retired CIA who when they were asked by people what laws, what illegal orders has Trump given, they couldn't think of any Are you kidding me?

You know what we saw happening in Venezuela. You can't think of anything that violated the law. I can't think of anything that complied with the law and any of that. Why are we there? What are we doing? Why are we shooting people in the first place without knowing what they've got on their boat? Why are we circling back and murdering people in the water who have been shipwrecked? Everything about that operation was criminal and illegal. Mark Kelly

and this other person can't think about it. But then the real farce about all this stuff is that Trump and Warpete couldn't just say well, I didn't we didn't do anything illegal. If they had taken that approach, Mark Kelly and these other people would have backed down, because they backed down where they were challenged by news anchors to name something. Meanwhile, the judge says, you're asking me to do something that the Supreme Court has never done.

Isn't that a bit of a stretch? The Trump administration tried during the hearing to argue that the diminished speech rights that apply to active duty military meant to preserve obedience and discipline, should apply to Kelly, who is now retired.

That's never been done before, said the judge. Leon seemed particularly perturbed about Kelly's situation, specifically that under the Trump regime's new proposed rule, retired members of the military serving in Congress could be punished for criticizing the Pentagon.

and punished them for that. Here we have Trump doing that, doing it to a senator even who is not in the military, you know, trying to punish him for this.

asks the lawyers of the Trump regime. In other words, if congressman or senator is on the Arm Service exhibition, how can they be punished for criticizing what the Pentagon is doing? If you're going to do this type of thing to Mark Kelly, it's absolutely insane, so he said. And after the trial, Mark Kelly was there, he said, hesth censured me, and he's now trying to demote me for things that I said and for doing my job as a US state, as a US senator. He said,

this isn't happening in isolation. Since taking office, this regime he used the word administration, I use the word regime has repeatedly gone after the First Amendment rights of many Americans, not just him. And so that's where we stand.

stolen land. So we had people show up in front of her multimillion dollar mansion and say, you stole that, so I want it back or whatever. Okay, let's understand the principle that's involved here, and the founding father has understood this. It's just plain common sense. Really. Thomas Jefferson is famous for the quote the earth belongs and usufruct to the living, right, and what do you mean by that? Okay, it is basically when you look at that term, we

don't use that anymore. Perhaps it's used in legal circles. I don't know, but the sense of that word usufruct is actually his quote was that's a construct of his quote to Madison in a letter of what he said was the dead have neither Let's see I wrote this down. I have trouble reading this. They have neither power nor rights over these things, right, And in essence, what you're

talking about is something that is basically a usufruct. It is enjoying the fruits and the benefits of a property without actually owning it, so as so far as it's compatible with it not being destroyed or injured. And so

when you look at this, what does that mean? Well, you know you can't take it with you, right, And so if you want to go back and say, we're going to eradicate all the property records of things that people have done to transfer this down through you know periods of time people have gone out and they've used

their money to buy this property and everything. But we're going to ignore all that and we're going to go back and look at who originally owned this and give it to their descendants rather than all the different things that have happened.

as caretakers of land. How do we get this and why is it that people want to throw all these boundaries off and just great chaos. Well, they've got their own agenda and it doesn't have anything to do with justice or social justice or anything else. Justice is to allow the people who have worked for these things and have legally transferred this. We have a system for ownership, and this is just trying to turn the apple cart

over and pursue a position of theft. But again, the dead have neither power nor rights to the land the earth belongs and to the living. In other words, we're here as caretakers temporarily and we will pass on, and then there has to be an orderly way for that to pass on, and we need to leave that alone. Well, another question here from Charlie says, so you need to do some good news segments every show. Two hours of

straight bad news is too depressing. Find something positive please. Well, when I talk about the news, quite frankly, the news, the news that we have here at this point in time is all really bad. Quite frankly. I mean, I could tell you a story about somebody who a police officer who gives a pair of shoes to somebody who needs them on the that's homeless, and there have been

stories like that that's happened several times. But it really my purpose in this show is to try to warn you about things that are coming down the pike, like this great taking you know where they have gone through and surreptitiously change the UCC code so you don't really own any stocks or securities or bonds and it is now you just have an entitlement to it that can easily be wiped out if there's a major financial crash,

which we have already seen one in our lifetime. In our recent lifetime in two thousand and eight, you have something like that happened again, and they've already set everything up to take everything away from you. So my purpose in this show is to warn people about things like that, to warn people about things like the lockdown and the so called pandemic and the vaccine and things like that. So I know that's bad news, but there is some good news. And that's why when I do talk about

Christian aspects, I talk about the Lord Jesus Christ. There is good news that you know, we are just here for a short period of time. We're not going to take any of this stuff with us, and there is something better that is coming, that is far better that's coming, and it is a free gift of grace. This is something that Jesus paid it all and you need to understand that look into that because you're not going to live forever. You've got these people like Jeffrey Epstein and

Donald Trump who think they are but they're not. And I think this is also from Charlie. He said, I'd like to see a real DK coin in silver. Alex Jones sells a tenth of a gram of zero point nine nine nine gold for one hundred dollars and says, you're not paying two thousand dollars an ounce like you're getting a better deal. It says, today's value of a tenth of a gram is something like sixteen dollars, so it is a five hundred percent markup. Well, so a

couple of things here. I'm not interested in getting into gold and silver right now, because, as I pointed out, in terms of selling it and having an inventory that I've got to turn over and so forth. I'm interested in getting gold and accumulating it as an individual because I think that that is one of the few things that we can do to prepare financially. However, I don't want to get into doing what Tony does because this is a it's a crazy market right now if you

look at how volatile it was. We were just talking about that yesterday.

or brush your teeth with. That was the best silver that they had. So in defense of Info Wars, I will say that because the market is so incredibly volatile. I mean, if you're going to put something up on the website and just have it stocked as far as inventory, and you're going to sell it out to people, you better put it in something crazy like a five hundred percent markup, or you're going to lose a lot of money on it. So again, this kind of volatility, it's

not something I wouldn't want to be a retailer. And as I said to Tony yesterday, I don't know how he does it. I mean he's operating, literally, folks, in a hyperinflation environment. It's bad enough that it's going up very rapidly, but then you got these places where it retrenches and we just saw over the last weekend now it dropped significantly, so it's it's really difficult to do

things in a volatility market like that. So anyway, this is from Rick d. He said, what are your thoughts on the Epstein document that claims Joe Biden and died in twenty nineteen and was replaced by an actor in a mask. I've noticed that Biden's ear lobes changed from time to time. His height also changes. There's a photo of Biden at Colin Powell's funeral and there seems to be a square tab on his ear, and he sent some photos of that. And Yeah, there was a guy

who did a AI synopsis. You've seen the AI things. I think I showed you one where you've got a guy doing selfies and he runs up to a movie set and you've got some actors there, like maybe Harrison Ford on the set of Indiana Jones. So he runs up and he does a selfie next to Harrison Ford, and then he runs over to another area and there's another classic movie that's over there, and he does another one. He keeps doing that over and over again different places. Well,

somebody did that with Jeffrey Epstein. And one of the scenes that they had, they had a group of politicians and them was Joe Biden, and then they had a Joe Biden that was absurdly tall, like eight feet tall, right behind him, and that's what they were trying to refer to. But I've seen some pictures of Joe Biden and some things that look like masks on his neck and everything. Look, I can't say one way or the other. I have no way to know whether that is true.

I just I know, however, that that is not anything that I would put past them. They would certainly be capable of doing that. They might actually be technically capable, but certainly they would be morally capable of pulling off a hoax like that. I don't believe that Trump was shot in the ear because of the you know, the rapid healing that he had and the no scar of that. So there's a lot of things like that that I

am suspicious of. But I'm not going to major on that because I can't prove it one way or the other. I just have my suspicions, you know, That's what I think is And so it might very well be that they replaced Joe Biden. But unfortunately, I think as bad as the Biden presidency was, as authoritarian and tautalitarian as his policies were. And I said this a long time, you know, when he was running for office, I said, Joe Biden is absolutely one of the most tautalitarian senators

I've ever seen in my life. He was always involved with Warren drugs, and he pushed that along against the Constitution for the longest time. Yes, Lands, I.

the Biden regime were equally totalitarian and authoritarian. So if Biden was alive or dead, whether he was signing the stuff or was autopin, that was the group that was around him. And again, do you really think that most of the stuff that's happening is Trump. He's the front face of this and he's the person that they used

to create chaos and conflict. But I'm not going to make a I'm not going to plan a flag in this and say, well, he was absolutely dead, because look, if you jump into things like this as lean as was saying, get into something's really salacious like that and major in that, first of all, you're missing some of the more subtle, dangerous things like I was talking about good example of the UCC stuff and how they've manipulated that.

So you're going to miss that if you're focusing on these salacious things, and if you get it wrong, that discredits everything that you've said basically, so you have to be careful not to go places where it's not verified. And that's there's a lot of stuff that's out there that is like that.

a year ago. And there's Trump being carried in on a what do you call that thing where they got four guys carrying it, and there's a seated shair that's sanan Is that what that's called. There's Natya Whuo flipping the switch the owl up there the occultic stuff. I guess he's going in the tunnels with them. I don't know what the significance of him pointing to his wristwatches there, but here he is. He's back at the temple. Yeah,

crazy a no name asked me. So see if you can interview Bradley Dean and or Tim Brown from Sons of Liberty, and I've been interviewed several times by Bradley Dean. I've had him on as well, and he's doing a podcast now. I think he used to be on Genesis Radio and that foldage, so now he's doing a podcast. Jay Fletcher says Espen was deeply involved in the quote unquote science community, CERN, prestigious medical schools, astrophysicists, computer scientists, them,

cell research. The list is long. He seems to have a steering hand on modern science. What was he are they up to? Well? I talked about that yesterday. The fact is that he's heavily involved in a lot of these different things because they have been able to use science to control, manipulate and of course make a lot

of money with things. But it's control manipulation when you see what he was doing with the emails in terms of gates and how they were going to profit from the pandemic, how they were going to be able to use we've got to restructure these things so that we can make money off of your charitable organizations and actually take money out of that for profit. But it's also the transhumanist aspect of it and the genetics aspect of this,

and that is really truly an evil. And let me just interject here because I stopped yesterday before I got completely finished with what was truly happening with the transhumanism aspect of it. Going back to JD. Hall and what he had to say, I thought it was very interesting because I've talked about how transhumanism is a religion. It's the religion that was there right there in Genesis when Eve has the forbidden fruit and disobeys God. I'm going to live forever and I'm going to become like God.

And that really is the basis of transhumanism. But I never thought about the fact that they have an eschatology, the end Time Study, and their eschatology is called the Singularity, which I thought was kind of funny. And he says, and then of course they also have a salvation narrative defeating death through technology. It has a priesthood, the Silicon Valley futurist and the tech billionaires. It has rituals biohacking and genetic modification, and I would say abortion as well.

It also has sacred texts from Kurzweil and Yuill Harari and Elon Musk. So, yeah, it is something of religion, isn't it. The Epstein files prove that it merges seamlessly with ancient pagan worship. The same people funding AI research, we're funding temple construction. The same network pursuing genetic superiority through breeding programs was engaging in ritualistic abuse documented by victims and investigators. This isn't a coincidence. This is convergence.

And all false religion ultimately serves the same principalities, whether you call them ishtar Moloch, or progress and evolution. And just remember, you know, when we've got Donald Trump and his mania about building monuments to himself, this two hundred and fifty foot monument, this arc that he's got arch that he wants to put up to be the largest arch of anybody that's out there, and he wants to make it two hundred and fifty feet because that'll be

taller than any of the other ones. And he says it's going to because we've got that two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the Decoration of Independence. It's like he probably ought to put up a fallen arch, I think, because that's what has happened. This nation has fallen from the principles that were there. Stable Nuclei says, oh wait, move on.

I do wear pants before twelve pm. I guess I could aspire to being retired someday and maybe not wearing pants before twelve pm, but as it is right now, I do put them on one leg at a time. Actually, could you give your opinion on the weather manipulation? For instance, Maryland had snow, ice and freezing temperatures single digits at night, while Alaska and Greenland had temperatures in the mid to

upper thirties. Well, I've said before I don't spend a lot of time on it, but I said before that I think that there's a tremendous amount of manipulation of the weather that is happening, and it is you know, I believe that the chymptrail thing is real. I've seen convincing evidence of that myself. And of course, they had geo engineering conferences on a regular basis decades ago and they said, yeah, we can do all that stuff. We just have to decide who gets to set the thermostat,

you know who. Some people want it colder, some people want it warmer. And as he's pointing out, we got these temperature inversions. It's hard to say. I just got to say that when we look at the schemes that they want to do now in terms of doubling down and making them really really obvious, and putting a bunch of stuff in the stratosphere and blocking out the sun, how dangerous is that. It's almost like these people are trying to terraform the planet so that we can't grow food.

Isn't it trying to shut off sunlight, trying to kill co two that plants need. Everything that they're doing mitigates against that. But of course when they do the geoengineering, then they can claim that it was man made, which it was not made by us, but they use that as a pretense to ban the things that we have.

really get people. You have the influence to tell people that climate change is real. Most of you don't believe that climate change is real, but you need to reconsider this because it is real and man made climate change.

You need to start talking about global warming. And I thought it was kind of interesting because they admitted that the vast majority of meteorologists didn't believe in the climate change stuff because they know how variable the weather is, and so they were trying to convince them, and they did convince some of them. Unfortunately, John Hunter says. Rick Jackson just announced that he's running for governor in Georgia. While he's not perfect in any way, I do think

he's the best candidate in the race. What are your thoughts on this candidacy? And he gave me his website. He said, I work for one of the companies that he founded, and I want to hear an outside opinion. Well, just briefly. I don't want to get into too much detail about it because I'm not involved in that election, but I did go to the website and take a look at it. He's the interesting guy. He's a businessman, and his personal story is very impressive. It's a success story,

by the way. You know, when we when people run, the first thing they do is, you know, he's got one tab here that's about him, his personal story and what he's doing and how he got there. And then he's got another tab that's got some policies that he

thinks are important. And I got to say, you know, when we had the situation where they had a tremendous amount of out of state money that came in to support this guy who was running against Frank Nicely, and because Frank Nicely had worked very hard to try to stop out of state money from coming into Tennessee. So because got lost in the legislature, he got hammered by

that in the next election. And the guy that they put up, I have never ever seen anybody running for political office that doesn't tell you anything about their background. I thought that was the most suspicious thing I'd ever seen in my life, because he didn't tell you what he did for a living now or ever. And so the guy was a completely you know, you knew less about him than you know about ice agents. And so when you look at Rick's story, it is very impressive one.

He said, he grew up in foster care, five different foster homes, thirteen schools. He lived in the projects in Atlanta. I never knew his father, raised by mother who was struggling with alcoholism. And this guy became very, very wealthy. He's got companies that generate over three billion dollars in revenue, and so he is. He said he worked his way out of this. When he couldn't afford to stay in college, he took a straight commissioned sales job later bought the

company that he worked for. So again, hats off to him. That is an amazing success story. When I look at what he's chosen to talk about that. He did. He talks about helping Brian Kemp in Georgia with the COVID situation, and evidently his businesses have something to do with medicine in some way, shape or form, which to me that would be a bit of a red flag anymore after this point, especially if somebody brings it up in the

context of COVID. But anyway, he also worked to help foster youth people youth who are in foster homes and that type of thing because of his background. But he does have some good things. They're kind of standard Republican stuff, promising to cut taxes or costs, secure the state, and make government work for the people. That type of thing. It's kind of boiler plate Republican rhetoric that's there. But he does talk about freezing property taxes. That is something

that is important. I don't know specifically what his plans are. I mean, you know, we have was the guy's name in Indiana ran from Governor's Libertarian. He had very specific way to limit property taxes. I thought Donald Rainwater that was his name, and his idea was, okay, let's just fix it something like seven percent and you pay it once, just like you do when you buy a car something,

you pay it once. And so you could either take that seven percent and pay it all up front and fold it into your thirty year mortgage, or you could pay like, pay it over seven years, one percent a year for seven years and then you're done. You paid it at the closing and you're done, or you pay it over a seven year period and you're done. And I think that's really wise. I think it is criminal that we can't own property, and we can't own property as long as we are under the idea of property taxes.

So at least he's looking at that, he's saying to freeze it, not to end it. It's also talking about cutting the state income tax, again cutting it rather than eliminating it. But if you look further into his policies, he's saying that he wants to cut it in half in four years and eliminate it by eight years. So again I don't have any problem with most of the stuff that he's got here, but I do have concerns

when he talks about making government education more efficient. I just you know, when we start talking about education is even a role of the government, you lose me at that point personally, as you all know if you've heard me speak, he says, use technology and AI to eliminate wasteful spending and improve services. You know, I could get behind a candidate who would say, let's eliminate AI from government.

Let's prohibit government from using AI because it's going to be used to surveil us, it's going to be used to aganda is US, is going to be used to audit send everything that we do. And so I'd like to see a prohibition of AI completely from government.

I certainly he's had an excellent brought himself up from rags to riches, and good for him, but I don't know about his politics that are there, Steven says David.

I'd like to get your thoughts on this. Well, I did not see the sermon, so I'll just go with your take on it, because I've seen a lot of people who have they want to support law enforcement and order, and this looks very leftist and radical anarchist on first inspection. I'll just say that when I've talked to Matt in the past and again, I you know, Matt and I are one hundred percent of the same page when it comes to what's really important, and that is our relationship

with Christ and I really respect what he does. So that he's a pastor, he's very busy with that, he's very busy with pro life organization, the mission that he has there, and so I can just assume that based on the conversation I had with him when all this stuff was kicking off at the very beginning in Venezuela, I said, do you want to talk about that? Because I thought that was just a moral outrage, and I still do think it's a moral outrage from the very beginning,

from I think it was in September or something. And Matt came on, he goes, well, I don't really know about that, and I haven't followed that at all. And so I understand that Matt doesn't get into current events in the level of detail that we typically look at this. That's not his main area of involvement, you know, like I said, he's more involved as a pastor as somebody who's trying to operate on a pro life mission and

things like that. So I certainly understand that. And there's been a tremendous amount of stuff on the internet on social media that you see from people who are cheering this. That really surprised me about that, and so I imagine that if Matt is just kind of glancing at this, maybe that's what he's picking up on, and maybe he's gotten a skewed picture of that. But as you know,

I don't appreciate what I says done at all. I think it is tyrannical and I think it is very evil, and we could have a difference of opinion on it. I just based on what I know about Matt, I just think that probably it's just the current event that he was listening to people, but maybe he trusted and

these people are pushing Trump in terms of all this stuff. Well, those are the ask me anything questions that we got, and we also thought it'd be kind of interesting to ask groc something about me, do you have any questions for me? Grok? Because I had looked at grok. You know, it has a summary for different profiles, and I thought when it summarized what I had, what I was about, and things that I said on Twitter and on X. I thought it was actually pretty perceptive, you know, when

you think about GROC. I thought it was kind of aptly named by Elon Musk because it comes from the novel Robert Heinlein novel Strangers in a Strange Land, and the essence of GROC what it really means in terms of definition, is to acquire an intuitive understanding, to know without having to think. That is kind of the way that AI operates. It kind of has this intuitive thing by looking at statistical stuff and it doesn't think, but it seems to know certain things. It seems to know

certain things about me as well. So here's I think you'll find this interesting because if you've listened to the program, you kind of know where I am. It's interesting to see the questions that this AI would ask me. Said, Number one, you've been consistent for years and warning about technocracy, transhumanism, and centralized control via institutions like the NIHCDC and emerging AI surveillance systems. So what do you see as the biggest, single,

biggest tipping point moment right now? In twenty twenty six, where these agendas could accelerate irreversibly, and how should every day people respond practically. Well, I would say that that's one of the reasons why I've covered these issues with what is happening here domestically, I think that is the

biggest issue. And I know that a lot of people disagree with me on the ice issue, but I think the federalization, the militarization of the police is something that has been happening for a very long time, and that it is being accelerated and we're seeing a convergence of a lot of these different things, these technologies. When you look at the amount of money that DHS is spending, I think what they spend on surveillance so something I

forget exactly which aspect of it. I think it was on surveillance equipment, but it was more than they had spent combined in the last decade on this stuff. And so this is rapidly accelerating under Trump, and I think they know that, and they're trying to create not only in the US, but in every Western country. They're trying to create with this massive migration. They're using that as a tool of chaos and conflict and division and that's

exactly the way they're playing that here. So I think that that is really the aspect that we see here. So i'd say, how do people respond to this practically? Well, you need to prepare for chaos domestically, for war domestically, because we have all these countries are trying to get involved in foreign wars as well. Foreign wars may come to our shore. I don't think are insulated against that

anymore because of our complicated infrastructure. So again I would suggest that you go to jacklosson books dot com take a look at the books that he's got there. In terms of preparing, he's got tremendously valuable detailed advice about things that you can do as an individual to prepare. I think you need to keep your ear to the ground and see what is happening with all this stuff. And of course, financially, gold and silver are part of

that as well. Number two you says, after your departure from Info Wars, you built an independent platform emphasizing critical thinking, historical parallels, and spiritual insight. What were the key lessons or frustrations from that era that shaped how you run the David Knight Show today, especially regarding media independence, audience trust, and avoiding echo chambers. Well, again, there's not you know,

that's kind of a perceptive thing there. But I think the key thing is not to be trusting of any individual source. But again going back to critical thinking and to evaluate these things on a one by one basis, not just to take it as a well, this is something that the Wall Street Journal center, this is something that the New York Times, this is something that Fox News said. And I trust those people. Don't trust anybody. Don't trust me. I could get things wrong. So do

your own investigation. I'll tell you why I think what I think, and you can do your own thinking about that. Here's another one on COVID vaccine skepticism, what you call the medical martial law. You've highlighted things like potential DNA impacts, immune disruption, and elite agendas. Looking back, with several years of hindsight, what stands out as the most vindicated claim you made early on and what, if anything, would you

revise or emphasize differently? Now? Well, I think what I think I got the most wrong was the lab leak stuff. In December. I was the first one at info Wars to talk about that because it seemed fishy from the start, and I said, well, you look at this supposed wet market where they had the bat soup and later on came panglin soup and all this other kind of nonsense.

I don't believe that. I said, it is interesting that the only biosafety level four lab that they have is right there near that wet market in Wuhan, So I said it might be some kind of a leak of gain of function research. Well, in the years since that, I've become not only anti vaccine but anti virology, and I'm skeptical of all these contagion narratives that are out there. Number one, number two. It took me about a month

before we started seeing the response of the governments. And when I saw the response of the governments was to lock everybody down and to keep us isolated until they got a vaccine ready for us, It's like, Okay, this is dark winter that is out there. So I would say that that was vindicated early on, and so the lab leak aspect of it, I think was wrong. I still think it's wrong, and I think that the people who are pushing that are doing it as an alibi

for what they did. Well, we it was real, it wasn't real, and we did the best we could to protect people. We'll do better next time, Oh you bet they will do more. The next time. They won't do better, but the next time they have a phony pandemic, they will double down on that as well. So it says your show frequently ties current events to spiritual and biblical principles, resisting tyranny as moral imperative, elite protection networks as modern

principalities and powers. How do you balance the conspiracy research side with encouraging faith and hope, especially when the audience can get overwhelmed or cynical. As one of the people who left us the question here said, can you do some good news, you know, every day?

and so you can. It doesn't help to whistle through the graveyard. You're going to be in the graveyard soon enough. Tomorrow is not promised to any of us. And so does that sound does that sound black pilled or whatever it is. But here's the good news. Christ died on the cross for you. He paid the price for the sin that each of us has committed. And you can leave that all behind. You can separate that as far as the east is from the west. So that's the

good news. That's how we get through this. That's how we get through life. Look, life, this is a fallen world. It is very dark, it is very evil. And take a look at the people who are above us, the leaders. Of course, it's dark and evil. And so that is the good news. And all the rest of the stuff is a lot of the stuff that we look at as good and happy news, A lot of that is just trivial and it's to help you feel a little

bit warmer about what is going on. But if you take an honest look at what is happening, I think you've got to admit you're not getting out of here alive, and you're not taking anything with you. So why are these people killing each other over artificial boundaries and other things like that, trying to steal stuff from people. Don't get caught up in that. Instead, get caught up in your relationship with God, the creator of the universe. Find the love that he has there. That is what's going

to sustain you. You're not going to be sustained by the things that you can grab or being the strongest guy on the block, the Steven Miller approach. There's no salvation. There's no joy in that either. So one more question from Gronk. You've interviewed to why range of guests over the years, from economists like Jouselenty to liberty advocates. Who would be your dream guest right now, someone who's been silent, controversial, or hard to reach, And what one question would you

lead with? What do you think Lance, you got an idea who if we could interview anybody that we want to, I think I would get Donald Trump here next to me and I would ask him some questions.

But then I would follow up just kind of do a what is it Colombo thing? Oh? One last thing? Who told you to lock down the world in twenty twenty and would you do it again? Did you think that it was effective? And why did you believe them when they told I know he was told by he said, he was told by Fauci and by Deborah Burke said, two very smart people. They bragged about the fact that they followed this bogus simulation from the Imperial College of London.

But I would ask him, why did you believe that it's so ridiculous? At the point that you did it, there was no evidence of a pandemic. But anyway, that's I guess. We can always dream about that. We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we will be right back. Stay with us.

the best one because there are no fees at all. Well, everything else has fees, but right now Zell does not have that. A subscribe star is good because that is something that you can set up as kind of like a monthly recurring fee that's like a budgeted thing, and then you don't have to think about it each time until your credit card changes. And then I've had a lot of people say, you know, they stop taking out of my credit card because it changed. I didn't realize that.

But anyway, if you go to Davidknight dot news, you can find the places where the program is broadcast, as well as places where you can support us. And we really do appreciate that we were one hundred percent user supported. So let's I've got a little bit of time here before we get into the Noel Sharky interview. And it's a really interesting interview, and I appreciate Ryan finding that and cutting it out and sending it to us. It was back in twenty thirteen we did that interview, and

I think you're going to find it pretty amazing. So unfortunately, he lays out the issue that's there, and we don't have any happy news on the killer robot front. It's only bad news, sorry, folks. Bad news about that we got swarms. They've for the last thirteen years since I talked to Noel Sharky, they have been going like bats out of hell in terms of trying to weaponize this technology, and they're getting it into a pretty frightening level here. So but let's talk a little bit about some other

issues here. This is a detransitioner was awarded millions of dollars in the first malpractice case of this gender mutilation that we're talking about. I call it minor mutilation, although it's pretty major mutilation, isn't It is the sterilization and mutilization of children. How evil is that? I mean, that's why when you look at things like the Jeffrey Epstein stuff, is it any surprise that the elites were focused on

this type of thing. Look at how they hate humanity, how they want to kill people, how they want to harm children, And that tells you that this is a satanic agenda behind all this, right there an unforgivable evil, which is what this is characterized. At only sixteen years old, a young girl underwent quote unquote top surgery, a double missectomy, I guess, a transgender affirming procedure in which her perfectly

healthy breasts were removed. Now, at twenty two years old, no longer identifying and con trast to her real biology, she has become the first de transitioner to successfully win a malpractice lawsuit against those who abused her. And that really is what happened, folks. So it's a two million dollar judgment. A jury in New York held both her psychologist as well as the plastic surgeon liable for this

for the so called medical care that they gave. And again, I think we're going to look back on this in a few years, and we're going to look back on it like people look back on the frontal lobotomies that they were doing to people Back when was that, I guess the fifties. It was one of the daughters of the Kennedy clan that they did a frontal lobotomy too. So I said, you've got some psychological issues here, We're just going to cut out a part of your brain.

And I think that's going to be the way that people are going to eventually see the truth of this. Since the entire case is sealed, including all the trial transcripts, the product of my furious note taking during the proceedings may be the only way for the public to learn the final definer details of the lawsuit, said Benjamin Ryan. He was the only reporter to attend the entire trial, and since they kept it closed to the public, it's just his notes that he took. The attorneys representing the

representing the person who was damaged, said Einhorn. The psychologist drove the train in terms of the counseling of the then teenager, accusing him of putting the idea in Fox's head that she needed to address her apparent gender dysphoria by permanently changing her body through a double missectomy. Her mother said during the trial that she was opposed to the surgery but ultimately gave in fearing her daughter would commit suicide without the irreversible procedure, a frequent refrain of

those who advocate for transgender procedures. I think it was a scare tactic. I don't believe it was malice. I think he believed what he was saying, but he was very, very wrong. Well, I just got to say, you know, when you look at this, I don't know how it you know, I would be hard to say that it

wasn't malice, but nevertheless, it was definitely wrong. And Robbie Starbuck, director of the War on Children, said what was done to these kids is a crime against humanity, an unforgivable evil that must be extinguished from the earth never again. The damage these kids carry is heartbreaking. That's absolutely true. That's my son. I think it'll be recognized as the equivalent of frontal lobotomies. Later on, like so many others,

she discovered transgenderism as a struggling teenager online. I was fifteen when that started. Medicalization began at sixteen. They started giving her hormone treatments and other things like that. And just look at the fact that Planned parenthood that has a business model that is based on ripping babies apart limb by lamb. Of course they have made this a profit center for them as well. So if they can't kill you as a baby, maybe they can rip you

apart as a teenager or a child. British freelance columnists Sonya Soha called the verdict quote very significant, noting more cases are coming they're likely to fundamentally change the US medical profession's approach to surgically altering the healthy bodies of children were questioning their gender, and again, why are they making an exception for something that is this serious, this irrevocable, and allowing children to make that decision, and even in

some jurisdictions coming after parents who try to stand in the way of what the school is doing. And it all goes back to this pedophile agenda. When you lick at number of people and seen this for the longest time, it's not just Jeffrey Epstein, the people around him in

a scandal. The longest serving Speaker of the House for the Republicans and perhaps maybe for the Democrats as well, was Dennis Aster, a guy who was a wrestling coach, pedophile, and he was handpicked by the Republicans to be a Congressman and then put in the position of being the Speaker of the House, the leader of the Republicans. They want corrupt people like that, and so this is how

we get to this point. We are filled at the top with people who are have secret private lives that are exactly the opposite of what they present to the public.

They also believe in the flat earth thing. They disavow the Trinity. They push the view that the earth is flat and so forth. And so one guy who disagrees with that decides that he's going to paint the billboard. You have the picture of that land, so basically what it is. He just painted the entire billboard black and people took pictures of him painting it black, and it went viral. Now I think it's.

very different thing. I don't know why they did that. Why didn't they just take a screenshot of what was really happening there.

had to say. Censorship is not an answer. Silence is not an answer. You need to give people the full truth. But I think that it's important for us to understand that we don't need to run from people who have heresies. And if you've got doubt, you need to dig into it because the truth is there and it can stand the scrutiny. Again, the statement, I think it was attributed to Augustine said the truth, the truth, the Bible is like a lion that doesn't need to be protected. It

needs to be let loose and protect itself. And so I think that's the key thing. I'm for free speech. I'm for debating these different issues, and I think rather than just making the comment taking out the knot, I think you need to tell people why you believe that Jesus is God and give the references for it. Unfortunately, that is not what this person did, but again I understand his motivations there. I just think that it's important for us as Christians not to recoil in fear and

in censorship. You know, we can handle this, We can handle the evolution stuff. We should each of us have handled it on our own, because when somebody brings up a question like this, you need to settle it in your own mind. And if you've settled it in your own mind, then you can tell other people the reason that you have hope anyway, Again, it is over and over again we see the people putting different different ideas. That again putting out the idea that Jesus is not God.

That's an old heresy that's been around. It's called arianism a long time ago. It was a couple of hundred years after the New Testament has written that. Somebody suggested that, and it was pushed back and pushed against. We celebrate her courage. This is the LDS, the Mormons who are praising Eve's choice to eat the frib and fruit. That has also gone viral. This is a post from an ex account and it is LDS DIMS and so it's

Democrats and LDL and so LDS. I should say it's gone viral with two million views as of the writing. Now you could dismiss this and say, well, this person doesn't represent Mormon theology, but actually Mormon theology has said this thing. If you go back and look at the guys who have become who were recent presidents and prophets of the LDS church, it was Dollan h. Oaks who said it was Eve who first transgressed the limits of

Eden in order to initiate the conditions of mortality. Her act, whatever its nature, was formally a transgression, but eternally a glorious necessity to open the doorway toward eternal life. Well, that is kind of the not the eternal life aspect of this is something that many atheists and other people have said, Well, this is actually a good thing, you know, because we got the ability to think and to become

more like God. No, actually, it was cosmic rebellion. That's why when you look at it, it's just only one thing, right, just had you had one command and you violated that right, that's the bottom line. And so that was rebellion to God, and that's why it was such a serious consequence. That's what God was telling us.

entered the world. The entire world was cursed. And so when you look at the evil that is happening in this world and the nature of sin, this is one of the differences between Christianity and evolution why you can't reconcile those like Francis Collins, who is a part of the Human Genome Project. Before he got to the NIH, he tried to reconcile these things. But you can't because the evolutionist looks at death as an engine of creation.

We look at it as a curse. It is not our natural state and is not something that should be glorified and regarded as something that takes us to a higher state. Let me just give a little bit of an introduction here to Noel Sharky, because we're going to run this interview we had with him thirteen years ago.

It's kind of interesting this came up because I was talking about warpete and his fight with the CEO of Anthropic, because the CEO of Anthropics said, I don't think we should be doing autonomous killing machines, and I don't like the way AI is being used for the tyranny that we see being done by ice, and so I said, yeah, I talked to Noel Sharky several times about a decade or so ago, and unfortunately this Anthropics CEO is the

only one who's pushing back against this stuff. You've got Google, which used to have as their slogan, don't be evil. Now they want to be evil and they'll do anything for money, right, same thing with Elon Musk, the same thing with Zuckerberg, and the same thing with Sam Altman at Open Ai. And so Noel Sharky as an introduction here as an expert in robotics and AI and has been quite some time. He was known to the public because of his appearances on the BBC's Robot Wars, and

of course we got an American version of that. I believe Thomas Massey competed in Robot Wars at one point in time because he was an engineer. If I don't have that wrong, I think he did, and also a program that's called Techno Games. So Noel Sharkey was known to people in the UK through those BBC programs. He's a chair of computer Science at Sheffield University. He held teaching positions at Yale University and computer Science and at Stanford in psychology. He has a PhD in psychology as well.

I guess that comes in handy when you're talking about AI. That's ultimately this is headed. He also chairs, and this is why I was talking to him, the International Committee for a Robot Arms Control and he is a co founder and co director of Foundations for Responsible Robots, and so he knows what he's talking about. And this is somebody who I guess he's not really too happy about what's happening either. So it's not necessarily happy news, but

it's news that we all need to hear. So here's this interview from two thousand and thirteen, twelve years ago.

try to describe it. His core research interest is now in the ethical applications of robotics and artificial intelligence, Doctor Sharky, can you hear me?

It was kind of a nutty report and it was the first report our government had put out about robotics, and at the press conference some journalists said to me, well, can you tell us a little bit about military robots, And of course I knew nothing about it, apart from a little bit about bomb disposal because I'm from Northern Ireland and we know.

And I just thought this is ridiculed. The way they were talking about it. It was like science fiction. They didn't seem to have an idea about the limitations. And so I wrote an article for the Guardian newspaper in the UK then two thousand and seven, and it started there and it's been a whirldwind since.

the most obvious propaganda I've ever seen. The media should be ashamed of itself for putting out these killer robots, these potential, these robotic projects that are being put out by the Defense Advanced Research Projects DARPA. DARPA has a research budget that is higher than they've got for the

entire budget of North Korea. We're supposed to be concerned about North Korea, yet North Korea's entire economy is about the same size as the DARPER research budget, and DARPER is constantly this seems to be their primary focus.

Kurzweild comes out and says, that's great. Now all he needs is a brain so he can act autonomously.

the military's mind. You're pushing back in the opposite direction. And we understand that the military industrial complex wants this very badly. They see this as a brand new profit center. I'm very, very concerned about the lack of accountability that is going to happen with these killer robots. Can you address that?

ban them. That means ban them before they get out and before there's too much investment, because once billions of dollars have been spent on it, it's going to be very difficult. Yes, yes, I'm thinking we're making very good headbit to un Actually.

But if they take a bunch of killer robots, as we've already seen with drones, we've seen how they can go in with drones. They can destroy a village and there's no accountability. Nobody is held responsible for that. And it'll even be easier for them. Once these robots have self autonomy, they can basically say that they've got plausible deniability. They can say, well, the software went wrong on it,

or it was a hardware bugget. It wasn't me, it wasn't the president, it wasn't the general, it wasn't the lieutenant, it was just these this crazy technology, So we'll fix it. Meanwhile, they've killed a lot of people and I can see them using this domestically as well as abroad. So if you think that this is something historically governments have killed more of their own people than they've killed in other countries.

It's called demicides. So if you think this is something that is simply going to be used against these people on the other side of the world that you don't like, you need to wake up about that as well.

have a little bit different. Situation in the US is unique in the sense that now we have this massive program of bringing home weapons that have been used in Iraq and putting them in police departments here in America. And we're already concerned about the fact that humans themselves are not being held accountable for their actions when they fire on a child with a toy gun. What's going to happen when a robot does that? Do you think there's going to be the accountability for that?

tasered him, fell down and cracked his head. He's now in a coma. They believe he may die. That happens all the time with tasers. So when you talk about non lethal force, you talk about shooting people with rubber bullets, you talk about using these gases on people. That's not something that we're looking forward to seeing happen. In terms of crowd control. That can be very very oppressive.

for discussion in the UN. And last Friday Friday, two weeks ago, they had a one hundred and seventeen nations from the CCW met and one of those nations could v to it. Russia over there, China were there. There was a massive, massive discussion and they accepted the mandate. So next year the CCW Committee are setting up an expert workshop to take this on board and discuss it.

won't secretly develop this on their own. Worry that they're going to have some kind of a robot gap or something like that, like they've had weapons defensively do it because they're afraid the other guy might do it. My big concern, and I think your campaign will be very effective at this as well, and that is to address the engineers and the scientists to try to get them to understand because that, I believe is where we really

need to go. As long as there's an engineer or a scientist who will develop this kind of stuff for pay, who doesn't look at the ethics of their work, you're going to find some kind of a politician or a dictator somewhere, who will do it, who will use those people, who will pay them large amounts of money, and who will break any treaty that comes up, won't you.

don't work for the government. But we need to have that kind of awareness with engineers. And as you pointed out, it's very difficult in America to get a job if you're an engineer that doesn't involve the military industrial complex. I know when I got out it took me a while to find a job where I wasn't working for the military. That was my degree initially. So I understand that, and it's good that people will privately say that, And I think I really applaud you for what you're doing

because getting the information out there. People don't even believe that this could happen. In so many cases, they don't believe that the technology is there. They think it's just the science fiction fantasy of the terminator and We've been criticized for that here that we're talking about some wild thing, talk about the absolute talk about how the technology is approaching rapidly.

nasty things surveying people. But you're starting to get a lot of drones, and once the drone has become autonomous, not even arms, they can be everywhere.

anywhere on the planet within a one hour window. So this thing has been tested at thirteen thousand miles an hour, so that's just.

justification and without congressional authorization. That's going to make them even more likely to get involved in these wars. And there's this thing called blowback. You know, once you start a war somewhere else, it will come home to you one way or the other. Eventually. It may be asymmetric warfare, it may be terrorism with people coming to your country and blowing people up and shopping, which will then be used to send out the crusher robots. But thank you

so much, Professor Sharky for joining us. We're out of time. Good luck on your campaign. Keep trying to educate people about these dangers. It's a very important thing you're doing.

Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at Thedavidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com