Fri Episode #2104: World War, Censorship & Surveillance

they let that anniversary pass for James Clapper. We're going to take a look at Trump's mission, to which I think we can sum up in two parts, to take America down and take down his enemies and get revenge. So we're going to begin today with the rumors of war, because folks, there is no better way to take down America than with a massive war change the world, have a world war. We'll be right back.

crack under the burden of Ukraine? French navy sees his nine point six tons of cocaine from fishing boat off West Africa must have been one heck of a fishing trip. I guess report Trump was made aware of Ukrainian counteroffensive plan that requires US intelligence support, and is Trump now supporting more fighting in Ukraine?

to write this story. I don't know if the government completely wrote it for them or what, but they took the narrative that was given to them by the government, saying that it's a long descriptive narrative like a top gun encounter, where these three Russian pilots enter Estonian airspace and the Italians who have they evidently defend Estonia. NATO does in rotation, they rotate different nations teams in and out. So at this point in time they had two Italian

thirty five's Ghost one and Ghost two. They launch interception from the air base who was fifty kilometers outside the capitol of Tollin. For an instant, the course of world affairs rested on the shoulders of five men, three Russians and two Italians who are not in radio contact with each other. What do you think the purpose of this article is. I think the purpose of this article is to get people to predict a programming, to say, look at how close we came. And here you've got five guys.

If one of them had made the wrong move or got trigger happy, this could have started World War three. And then they'll get everybody to understand this, and then they will tell us that something like this happened, so they can start World War three. The Italians began the routine of aerial intercept, rocking their wings from side to side in reply, Russians rocked their's back. Then one of the pilots raised his hand and gave a friendly wave.

The next twelve minutes, the Italian pilots trailed the Russians all the way to the Russian enclave of Kalinigrad, an unprecedent length of time for an incursion into NATO airspace. Well, they were headed to an area that is under Russian control. And again, Kaliningrad. I should have looked this up, but

I've seen this before. I believe it's landlocked. It's this enclave that is still there that the Russians have maintained control of even as they pulled out, kind of like Gitmo, let's say, except you can't get to it without crossing into the other country. And so just as we kept a foothold in Cuba at Gitmo, they have this foothold there in Estonia called Kaliningrad. So there was a bit

of a legitimate reason for them to be there. The potential flashpoint has sparked days of intense discussion inside of NATO over when, where and how they might pull the trigger, because that's what this has all been about. They have been moving relentlessly and steadily towards this moment since the nineteen nineties. They continued even after the Soviet Union fell. Of course, they had no mission anymore because NATO was

set there to oppose the Soviet Union. So what they decided they would do is to take over Russia, and they've gradually been moving in that direction with wars, civil wars and revolution and coups. We're really proud of how we react each time, said Lieutenant Colonel Gaetano Farina, the commander of the Italian Air Task Force that's under NATO command.

Since the Italian rotation began in August first, k Farino's men have been scrambled seven times, but on every occasion until now, the interceptions have taken place over international waters. The latest incident came in a two week period in which Putin launched a space of operations designed to probe NATO's ability to defend its borders. And then they list these and not a single one can definitely be proven

to be Putin. They are alleging this, but of course, you know, Trump kills people on boats without having any more proof than this, so why wouldn't they start a war? A barrage of drones fired into Poland. Now I've talked about this several times, and of course that's not at all what happened. I ended the show with that yesterday thing that more than anything, it shows the incompetence of NATO,

that they're not ready for war. These were decoy drones that had no controls on them, no cameras on them, nothing. They were there to take the hits and to draw the fire away from the drones that really were dangerous, and so they didn't get These drones shot down over Ukraine, they shoot down to even the decoy drones and or they were con used by the electronic countermeasures that were there.

And they get into Poland, but again they are not armed drones, and they go for a couple hundred kilometers into Poland. They scramble the NATO jets, they shoot very expensive missiles of these very cheap drones missed them, and one of the missiles falls down on a house and destroys it, even though it was a dud, the explosive didn't go off. And then the Polish prime minister are president I forget what his title was. One of them is the president, one of them is prime minister, and

they are opposite sides of this. One of them does not want war, but Donald Tusk, who has been for a very long time affiliated with the EU and the World Economic Forum and so forth, wants war. And so he was trying to tell everybody that this is a drone that had done this to the house, when they knew full well by that time that it was one of their dud missiles that miss so again to say, you know, Putin has launched a barrage of drones. What

a distortion of what really happened there. And then airports in Oslo and Copenhagen had to close due to unattributed drones. Even the telegraph says they're unattributed. Nobody knows who's flying these drones or for what purpose. I had said before that we might see the see Russia and China start to do attacks against infrastructure, you know, like airports where they shut them down. They might start to do that in a way that has deniability in it, and so

it could be something like that. But don't you want to have something that is far more solid before you start a world war? Well not these guys, because they're looking for any excuse. And both sides, both sides, including Russia, are involved in brinksmanship, and this is I should tell you where we are headed. In the past ten years, Russia has violated Estonian airspace at least forty times. So why is this the one that is showing that we're

leading up to World War three? Because now they want it so over the past ten years an average or four times a year, So why is this extraordinary? Well, they even did it when Putin was flying to Helsinki for twenty eighteen meeting with Trump, So why are they freaking out? Well, these other ones involved corner cutting, crossing over their territory by cutting a corner or something like that. How are this is going straight in? But it was going in to Cleningrad and that is what they want

you to skip over. So although the Russians followed their naturally a great order of an intercept, they did not alter their course or steer out of Estonian airspace. NATO is enraged, but the Italian lieutenant Colonel Fenna says, well, it's our job. The men were relaxed. We're professionals. This one according to protocol. This is how we had intercepts, and they did their part of the dance. And we did our part of the dance type of thing. As

soon as they're back in the hangars. Though, you had the politicians angry that they had not shot, and we just had Trump saying you should shoot. The politicians want war. The people who are going to fight the war no better. They're a little bit cooler heads. Fortunately, unfortunately, there will be somebody who will follow orders. The Estonian government does not assess the situation merited a kinetic reply, one which could lead to a far more explosive result in small nations.

The small Baltic nation that shares a one hundred and eighty three mile border with Russia. The Russian jets are not headed toward the Estonian mainland, nor were they armed with missiles that could blow up targets on the ground. The very fact the story was given to the UK Telegraph shows that these people are preparing us for war. They think they're trying to nudge us to it. This is programmed by the press. This is nudge news, folks, and you need to be aware of what their agenda

is behind all of this. By the way, tomorrow, while we're talking about war, tomorrow is the Occupy Peace rally at Gerald Sunte's Occupy Peace Organization, Kingston, New York. If you can go, you have a great time. There's going to be some great speakers that are there, and it's good to show that you stand for peace rather than for war. You can find out details about it at occupypeace dot com. US Navy puts on a light show with a seventy five hundred miles from the weapon test.

This is kind of like gorillas from the zoo grabbing a bunch of dirt and throwing it up in the air and beating their chest. In fact, you talk about gorilla beating his chest. I had a friend who has a retired marine and he went to the zoo and they had a big silverette gorilla on the other side

of the glass. And he looked at that gorilla, and the gorilla was really staring at him, and so Rick, you Rica's time, Mary, Rick beats his chest like a gorilla does and looks why he's looking at him, might not look And that gorilla just charged that glass with everything to the end. He said, he thought he's going to break the glass. But this is basically what these guys are doing with their nuclear weapons and their jets and on both sides. There's a lot of posturing and

a lot of beating of the chest. The US Navy launched multiple triment ballistic missiles off the coast of Florida and into the Atlantic, and the latest test of a system that can deliver thermonuclear warheads thousands of miles away. An Ohio class submarine launched the unarmed weapons from a submerged position During tests one evening saw the skies light up as far away as Puerto Rico, as mariners and airmen were informed of the operation well in advance in

order to establish safety zones along the missile's path. It comes as Russia declares NATO and EU you are now at war with Moscow in a chilling escalation. I think what they're saying is they have done everything except pull the trigger with us. They've pretty much declared, especially with Trump, that they want to have war. And then we have this unusual thing that's going on with Pete Hegseth, which

people are trying to figure out. He's ordered hundreds of US generals and admirals together on very short notice for no stated reason, at a Marine Corps base in Virginia. And so this is creating confusion and alarm about what this is really about. They said it may be political because there's been several senior officials who have been fired and replaced, but why would you have to have them

all there? That still doesn't make any sense. It's an unusual directive that was sent to virtually all of the military's top brass according to more than a dozen people, it was issued earlier this week, and it came against a potential government shutdown, and as hegsa's political moves have been deemed a since have deepened a sense of distress those who fear that he is erasing the Defense Department's status as a bipartisan institution. You believe that is a

bipartisan institution. It's not political at all. It's totally political.

a cyber attack, the Russians did it. If anybody or the Chinese theat or pointing the finger at anybody, they can't know immediately, first of all. Secondly, because the release of Vault seven, we know that the US has the tools, has developed the tools to look like they are any sovereign nation that they choose to look like. And oh, by the way, those tools were leaked and now all the guys have it, so it's not just the US, but anybody can look like anyone, and there's absolutely no

way that they can make that determination, especially immediately. As Gotre has pointed out many times, usually what you find out in these cyber attacks is that it's an inside job, somebody who is doing it for money or something like that from the inside. But that's the kind of investigation. You're not going to find it forensically by looking at the hack and that type thing, because they know a way to disguise that. But we have had that in

the past. We've had them say, well, we know it's Russian because the way the keys are and all this other kind of stuff, and it's like you're assuming that people don't understand. Faulse seven was shown by wiki leaks that they could do exactly that. So Denmark is claiming that state actors are behind the droning cursons. You and I both know that they haven't proved, they haven't apprehended anybody,

So how could they make that determination. It's a ludicrous lie that they're trying to dangerously escalate us into World War three. It's the only thing again to repeat what happened the first time it happened. It was in Copenhagen. Primarily they had two or three drones and for a couple of hours they would turn their lights on and flash their lights on to say, look, we're here. You know, just like when we had the drones on the East Coast that were flying around. Somebody wanted to be seen

doing that. They wanted to create a sense of panic and that type of thing and to shut down infrastructure, the same thing that was happening now in Denmark. Maybe it's the same people who did on the East coast. Who knows, but I mean it could be NATO for all we know in terms of a state actor, because NATO did run Operation Gladio. Denmark claims unspecified state actors quote unquote are behind a series of drowning incursions this

week shutdown airports and military installations in the country. Denmark's defense minister said these nighttime drone flights were hybrid attacks intended to spread fear. Well, I guess they worked, and now he's upping the fear. It's spending it even more. On Monday night, two or three large drones are spotted near Copenhagen Airport. Norway closed this airspace over Oslo Airport for three hours because they had a drone there was spotted.

On Wednesday night, drone incursions near another airport forced it to shut down for three hours, and Denmark's second largest airport was closed for an hour as well. Some of the West speculate that the drones are linked to Russia, although Moscow rejects such claims. So something is rotten in Denmark, and really rotten. This thinks to the high heavens. Are we going to allow speculation and unidentified state actors to

drag us into war? Well, they probably want over this won't do it over this particular issue, but it's just a constant drumbeat of fear coming from these people. You know, the Russians are here, the Russians are there, They're everywhere. So well, the question is, why would they even go to Denmark. Why wouldn't they go to a major country. No, slight intended to Denmark. Actually had some people who knew me when I went to report there, So I don't I don't want to trash your country, but it is

not a big military power. Mean, why wouldn't they do it with France or Germany or UK or something like that if they wanted to tweak the people in the EU. So RT responded to Trump's paper tiger accusation. Who is the paper tiger now? They said, And they said, if you look carefully at what Trump was saying, even though he's calling Russia a paper tiger, he was saying Europe can take care of this, and he wasn't saying We're

going to take care of it. Of course, that's what really would happen if they start a war, we would get drawn into it. But from RT, they said at the same time that Trump was saying that Russia was a paper tiger in big economic trouble, and because of that, he believed that the EU was in a position with Ukraine to take back all their territory in some of Russia's territory, they said. The problem is is that he said with the support of the European Union, they can

take back of their stuff. He didn't say we're going to help him necessarily. So that's what Russia is reading into this, and they said that at the same time, he's saying that Russia is a paper tiger. In that same speech, you talked about what pitiful shape Europe was in, and we can all see that. That's pretty clear to see. So he lectured them on their self inflicted wounds over the climate insanity and over their cutoff of cheap Russian energy.

It's all about the green madness. They've been driven insane by this green agenda. They've shut down their industry, they've made themselves poor, and they're not in a position to conduct a war, that's for sure. So he said it was meant as morale boos, except it probably doesn't sound all that encouraging if you look at what he said about Europe. With Europe's help, they can do this. Except he was saying that Europe is basically helpless and the

country is being destroyed. As you point out earlier, the French Navy sees his nine point six tons of cocaine from a fishing boat off the coast of Africa. Why didn't they just kill these people instead of even searching the boat. That's the new approach from Trump, isn't it. Nobody has ever done that. This is why I say you can't understand just how criminal and over the top Trump's actions are. If it was a small country that was doing this, he would be indicted by the International

Criminal Court, and he should be. He shouldn't get a pass just because he's president of the US. What he's doing is absolutely criminal. They at least stopped them and examine them. So I guess now, with the French connection, wish she enhactman when we needed. The French government can resell those nine point six tons of cocaine. Trump has been made aware of a Ukrainian counter offensive plan that requires US intelligence support. This is coming from anti war news,

and this is according to the Wall Street Journal. Wall Street Journal was asking questions as why the sudden about face by Trump and marching off to war when he was saying he wanted peace and a Nobel Peace.

might be able to even go further into Russia. The President made the post after spending time with a special envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg. Kellogg recently said that the US could kick Russia's behind and insisted that Ukraine could win the war despite Russia's continued gains in Eastern Ukraine and its clear advantage with manpower and industrial capacity. So he's now supporting more fighting in Ukraine. So as a New American and so they're looking at the people who

are influencing them. One of the things that got New American very concerned was response of Lindsay like the way they put it when of Congress's most triggered happy lawmakers reposted a social media statement in which Trump suggested that he's changed his mind in favor of continue fighting in Ukraine. It's usually a bad sign when Lindsay Graham approves of something the President says, because Lindsey Graham is wrong about everything. He's one of those senators that is the Countra indicator

for everything. Shortly after he scolded the UN delegation over his refusal to go along with him. His rhetoric was dramatically different from what Trump has been saying all year. His feelings towards Ukrainian and Russian heads of state have ebbed and flowed in accordance with his vacillating moods, and though he's more or less kept the weapons pipeline flowing to Ukraine, the President has been consistent in verbal support

for an end to the fighting. So again, if he's going to talk out of both sides of his mouth, why would we be so surprised that finally he's saying the same thing out of his mouth both sides of his mouth. And it's the wrong approach, of course, the one that he has focused on. It's hard to imagine that Trump would go through all this without a true desire to end the world as new American. I disagree

with that completely. The idea that he's faking a desire for peace is also undermined by a series of successful mediation efforts. Yeah, you know, like how he mediated with Iran in Israel. No, Actually, the fact that you know, if he's so serious about peace, you know, why would he be negotiating with Russia if he doesn't really want peace. You might want to remember what he did with Iran. He was negotiating with Iran just so that he could get them to let their guard down and then be attacked.

So is it a ploy for peace? They ask? It's difficult to tell if this is just Trump being Trump. A common perception among political insiders is that he often broadcasts views and policy changes after being inspired by the most recent person to have persuaded him, because he always chickens out, and the always is it's all really just about what mood is the end today? You know what happened this morning. Trump's posts may also be employed designed

to scare Russia into getting serious about a peace steal. Well, this guy is not a stable genius. He is an unstable, dangerously vacillating fool. Graham isn't the only one that gets excited at the idea of escalation. Dick Durbin advocated US

militaper's action after Russian drones violated Polish airspace. And again, this is a nothing burger, And the polls after that incident activated article for the NATO Treaty of Provision prompting consultations within the Alliance when a member state believes it's been threatened, And so Denmark is now repeating their own false flag and so Lindsay Graham tweeted out a long thing talking about how we need to have war blah blah blah blah blah. And he finishes this sentence this

is from Lindsay Graham. Time to end this blood path. Well done, mister President. No, the president saying we need to have a longer blood bath, we need to have more blood and Lindsey Graham, I've shown the clip before. Lindsey Graham and John McCain went to Ukraine years before Russia invaded, and it was when Ukraine was engaged, when Kiev was attacking its own people because they wanted to be independent of that government after the US led coup

that was under Obama. Except that these two Republicans, John McCain and Lindsey Graham, who always loved war, were there as well. And what he was telling these troops was next year, we got a goat in there and get Peyton And you could see that they were not very enthused about that. He's been after regime change in Russia for the longest time. For him to end this long screed of his about how necessary continued war and escalated war is to end it to say that it's time

to end this blood bath. That is the most hypocritical thing I've seen, even for Lindsey Graham. This is a new low of hypocrisy.

at this now in retrospect. It should be a twenty twenty vision to be able to see what he was actually doing with that talk about getting US out of NATO. You could see right away that he wasn't serious about getting US out of NATO. He was just trying to threaten them to get them to buy more US weapons. You need to get your spending up, You need to buy US military weapons equivalent to two percent of your GDP. That was all he was doing. He had no intention

of getting out of NATO. And why was he pushing that. Was it just so that the US military industrial complex could make more money, or was Trump really trying to get them to armor up for World War three. We don't want World War three to be over too quickly, do we? I mean with the soft European states that have quit preparing to protect themselves because US has protected them since World War Two. They've taxed their citizens very heavily.

I ported all into social services, not into preparation for war. So let's turn this thing around, because we're going to create this war. We want you guys to arm up, buy our equipment, and have enough equipment so that we can stretch this war out nice and long and do what we really want to do in terms of resetting the West. NATO is a globalist alliance. It threatens American

sovereignty and interests, and it's very well addressed. Washington said, we should steer clear of permanent alliances with any of the foreign world. Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced a bill to withdraw the US from NATO. Do you hear Trump pressuring people do that? He doesn't want to get out of NATO. He doesn't want to get out

of the UN. As a matter of fact, when you look at the agenda of using AI to police the bioweapon treaties, there's an article again I think that article is also a New American talking about what that would entail. It truly is amazing when you think of the extent of surveillance that'd be required to do that over everything. Yeah, I mean you going to look everywhere all the time in order to make sure that it is being complied with.

And AI can handle that mountain of data. That's what it does well and sortsly that looking for a particular thing. And so this is the path to total surveillance. That's why it was created by the UN. Is yet another UN agenda being sold by American president, just like Nixon sold the UN War on drugs, now Trump is selling the UN AI inspection. So we're going to have to have some global entity that's going to use AI to

surveil everything that we do. And just think about that. Well, you know, we can't have money laundering going on because of the war on drugs, so you have to set up this massive network of international surveillance of what is happening financially. And that's even before we get to digital currency CBDCs and stable coins and things like that. So this is going to be the same type of surveillance

over everything. And we can see how the finsin. I think that's a it is like it's a sin like si n We can see the kind of surveillance that that has entailed. But now they have AI to help them. So Mike Lee has introduced ability inside NATO and they're not paying any attention to it. But the American gives you a link to the action page. They're at the John Birch Society if you want to push for that.

I just don't think that there's anybody in Washington other than maybe Mike Lee who wants to get us out of NATO, especially not Trump. Well, let's take a look at some of the comments and we'll take a break.

do blood sacrifice rituals. With bombs, you can get a lot more blood all at once KWD sixty eight. Trump said in first week he would release Epstein records and the Ukraine War and open Fort Knox. So far, we're zero for three on those, shelly A. They all work together. Nothing happens without a banker.

The computer says you're dead, So I don't know what to tell you.

some news after the break. We're gonna take a quick break, folks, and we will be right back.

He's got a big crew from they got on YouTube and then they banned them and more layers of this onion are being pulled back. My thing is is that I'd look at this and I say, well, if Google groups me with Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones, then their search engine is absolutely clueless about what I'm actually saying. Jim Jordan had claimed that Google had committed to offer all creators again, all creators banned from YouTube for political speech,

the opportunity to return the platform. That is not what the letter said. And this is what Chris Manheim is saying. He said an information libration. He had said this before. He said, if you read it, that's absolutely not what it's saying. And so Alice Shows and Nick Quinte set up new channels on Wednesday and immediately had them taken

down or within twenty four hours. Google did tout its commitment to quote unquote free expression, but they only said if the company terminated their channels for repeated violations of COVID nineteen and election integrity policies that are no longer in effects. A lot of caveats about that, but it's very narrowly defined. There are many other things that are not allowed, but you are not allowed to know what those many other things are it's like the no fly zone.

That's no speech zone that YouTube is. So if you can only guess at what is ver Bolten, then that helps to stifle speech. It helps to propagate fear from people and self policing of their speech.

that's the reality. So again, what this was all about was Jim Jordan grandstanding yet again, virtue signaling yet again, and lying as usual while he gives cover to bad actors like Google and YouTube. This is what he does all the time. That's what Trey Goudi did. Trey Goudy got a job at Fox News for doing that, but he never did anything about Ben Gazi or any of these other things. He holds hearings over something that everybody knows is wrong, he never takes any action about it,

and he always uses it for his own purpose. So I guess that also has not changed. Right, Not only has the censorship that YouTube not changed, but the Republican congressmen who are doing this stuff have not changed. So the US is threatening to bar foreigners over remarks about Charlie Kirk. Again, Now you're not allowed to talk about Charlie Kirk. What is it that you're not allowed to

say about Charlie Kirk, Well, anything that's negative. So just watch your even if you have sympathy for his family, if you don't like what he had to say, they won't let you in. And we have a situation like that, they're going to pull the visas and or deport people who they say trivialize Charlie Kirk's murder. But it's more than that, it's just it's even if you disagree with his position on politics, and of course, Charlie Kirk never kicked anybody out of any of his events because they

disagreed with them. He invited disagreement, not the Trump administration. They're you looking for any excuse they can, not only to get us unto war, but any excuse that they can find to go to war against the First Amendment. Particularly, they're political enemies. The GOP loves censorship as much as the Democrats, and they are out to get their enemies, whether by hook or by crook, just like the Democrats did. Law doesn't matter. Principles like free speech do not matter

to either party. So there's a new test for foreigners want to enter the United States. What have they said about Charlie Kirk. This is a New York Times article. Dozens of people appear to be in line to be barred from the country, including a Brazilian congressman, a Mexican political commentator, a South African journalist. According to online posts from the State Department official who has now been appointed the little Charlie Kirk sensors are I have the Charlie

Kirk seat for censorship at the State Department. It's so or well in the double think. You know, here's a guy, as I said, many times he's spent his major thrust and I disagree with them on some of the arguments that he made. I disagree to them with some of his positions on issues, and I disagreed with him on the way that he made the arguments. Even when we agreed on the position, I thought that's not really a

good way to make that argument. But nevertheless, he was always about trying to engage in free speech and debate and trying to bring that back to the universities, and I think also at the same time showing people that the universities were really too far gone. He knew that, And I gave you the article from Alex Newman, who had talked to him on multipleccasions about the necessity for us to shut down these institutions that we call higher learning.

They're what are we e? We're going to learn that they think that they're higher than free speech and anyone else, and we need to stop subsidizing that anyway against anyone perceived to have trivialized, cordoned, or wrongly cast blame in mister Kirk's murder. So be careful if you don't buy the government narrative, if you are a conspiracy theorist about

the murder, they will throw you out. And again when you look at the long list of absurdities that they have put out about this shooter, you know he left the you know he thirty minutes. He goes across the campus with a disassembled rifle that he hides, and we don't know how he was able to hide those long aparts. And then he gets up to the roof, he reassembles it, and then he recalibrates it and all this other kind of stuff so that he can take a one shot approach.

And then he disassembles it again, leaves the screwdriver up there, climbs down supposedly with a disassembled rifle that you can't see on him, then reassembles it in the woods without the screwdriver that he'd left on the roof, and leaves the rifle there to be found, along with other confessions written on bullets that he didn't use. But don't say

anything about that or you'll get panned. Another striking case in which the administration appears to be using ideology as a litmus test for which foreigners can visit former senior State Department official Ricardo's Zuniga, who served under five presidents, including mister Trump, said, would the same rules apply to someone who ridiculed attacks on the opponents of the administration? Well.

In June, the State Department required many applicants to make their social media content public, and in July an official testified that online criticism of the war in Gaza could weigh against these applicants. In nineteen fifty two, law barred members of communist parties from immigrating to the United States. This is from New York Times. Interestingly enough, it was that very law that ilhan Omar's father was able to get by. And you know he was He was a

member of the Smalian government. He was a member of the Smalian Communist Party. That was public information and for him to be able to come into the country based on this nineteen fifty two law. He violated that law when he came in. And all of his family is here under false pretenses, in violation of that law.

how they're going to be using that. They're already starting with it. So, as I said before, I would agree with him on some of his positions, I would disagree with him on some of his arguments on those positions, and I would disagree with him on some of his positions on things. So that's not allowed anymore. Now he's now a canonized saint. So this woman who says that she disagreed with that, she's now not going to be allowed to enter the country.

the left is using it. Occasional Cortex Alexandria Occasional Cortex released a campaign email last week condemning the scourge of political violence and the conservative leader's rhetoric. She said, we can condemn this horrific assassination and the scourge of political violence without uplifting these ideas. She said, so everything is about Charlie Kirk on both sides of it. But for comic relief, again, we look at Trump the pettiness. I mean, this was not done as a joke, as a troll.

It would be funny if it was. As we were saying before this presidential Walk of Fame. Here's what it looks like. Here. You can see he's got all the presidential portraits there in a very long line until it gets down to Biden, and then what you see is a picture not of a person's face, but a picture of an auto pen right there in between. I guess two of them, you know, two Trump pictures that are there. So Trump's up there twice and Biden is not up

there once. Instead, they've got a picture of his autopen. It really is. The thing that takes away from the joke is that it's not really a joke. It's just his pettiness that is there. So we can see that in him some of the other statements that he made.

The Walk of Fame is part of a broader White House renovations under Trump, including gold gilding in the Oval Office, a marble patio in the Rose Garden modeled after as Florida State mar Lago, and a new ballroom under construction, and the installation of two seven meter flag poles on the White House lawn, which Trump has described as the best polls anywhere in the country or in the world. Nobody's got boles like this. Do they drive us? Yeah?

statute limitations. September thirtieth, twenty twenty, he testified to Congress and they say that he lied in that testimony and a Saturday posts the truth social Trump slammed Bondy over three people who have committed alleged crimes and not faced criminal charges, Adam Schiff, Letisia James, and James Comy. And I think that all of them have something should be

done about it. But I said, from the very beginning, I said, I don't think that people who weaponize the government and lawfair now that includes Trump, should be allowed to get away with it. But it also should not be seen as petty and personal. And I said, if you remember, I said, as Trump is about to be installed, I said, he is going to do this in a way that doesn't strengthen the rule of law. He's going to do it in a way that strengthens him as

a mafia. Don you know, don't mess with me, not like, don't violate the law, because we'll punish people to do that. No, don't mess with me personally. That's the message that he's

sending to people. And so insiders say that Pam Bondi has concerns about charging James Comy, do you think that somebody like her, who has lied publicly for Trump many many times already in just a few months, you think she'd be kind of concerned about where this might leave or already she's done this with not just the Epstein docs, but she's done it with a lot of other things as well, so as Cash betel So has Den, Bongino. These people are lying left and right, and everybody sees it.

And we all saw the lies from James Komy that were there, and we all saw the lies from James Clappers, I pointed out yesterday, lying about the surveillance of Americans and violation of the FISA Act and the Constitution. And he was never never charged for lying to Congress. And that was a significant lie. It wasn't just about something

that was going to affect another politician. Bondi has concerns about the case, which focuses on whether Comy made false statements during congressional testimony during the twenty sixteen investigation into

Russian interference in the US presidential election. According to a person who's familiar with her thinking, though she believes it would be possible to bring an indictment, this is CNN, saying this, if the Attorney General gives the go ahead to newly install US attorney Lindsay Halligan, a former Trump personal attorney, she could begin presenting evidence to a grand jury right away. Halligan has been spotted at the Justice

Department twice this week. Halligan has also questions about the case. According to a source that was briefed on the discussions, so testimony at the heart of the case came. It will be five years ago on Tuesday. There is a five year statute limitations for bringing perjury charges, which they allowed to expire with James Clapper. But think about this. We have a five year statue limitations for perjury to Congress. There's a three year statute limitations for pedophiles. What does

that tell you about Congress? Just think about those two things for a little bit, and it tells you everything you need to know about Washington, about the Epstein documents and everything else. Three year statute limitations for pedophiles, five year statute limitations for lying to Congress. And guess which one would have the higher chance of being brought against somebody. So I just want people to act, he said, And we want to act fast. If they're not guilty, that's fine.

If they are guilty, or if they should be charged, they should be charged. And we have to do it now, he said, because he's running out of his statute limitations. Meanwhile, we have from James O'Keeffe a bombshell that Alice Jones is all over senior doj. Epstein investigator admits Notorious Petro was a CIA and Israeli asset. This is in an undercover video that James O'Keefe and his people shot. So how about that. We never knew that, did we We didn't know that he operated for the CIA and for

a masade. But it's the guy confirming this. Yeah. So Alex, however, uses this in a strange way to excuse Trump. The ex Department of Justice investigator Glenn Peger said he interviewed Epstein's rape victims and investigated his flight logs he worked as let's see, he worked at the Department of Justice doing this. According to Peger, every time an Epstein case was set to go to trial, the billionaire human trafficker would pay off the families of those that he was

molesting and prostituting. Epstein would just pay them off. They were just like these little kids, they pay off their family. They're all broke, these kids and their poor families. So you paid them off like anywhere from a one hundred and fifty thousand to five hundred thousand. That's nothing in this guy's world. Regarding Trump, he explained that there's no evidence of him ever being on an Epstein airplane when children are being raped, but that he is allowing the

federal government to protect others who have dirt on their hands. Now, I want you to think about that for a second, whether you believe that's true or not. And even if it were true, do you really think that Trump is altruistically protecting other people? Does he put himself in this kind of a spot and he understands how even Maga is upset with him over this particular issue. Would he put himself in that kind of a spot to help other people? Have you ever seen Trump act altruistically when

it comes to politics. He is the most self centered narcissist I've ever seen in the office in my entire life.

that's not a justification. But that's the way he's being presented by this guy, by James O'Keeffe and by Alex Jones. Here. Yeah, Trump is altruistic. He would take the heat for all these other people. Come on, give me a break. You think we were born yesterday. These people think you were born yesterday. Trump is suddenly hesitant to release the files he said since he was not involved in the trafficking network, suggesting that he's protecting a lot of other people. So

here's the issue. Even if their narrative is true, and again, you know, it doesn't say that he didn't get involved in shady stuff elsewhere at other times and other locations, But that does not excuse what he's doing. Simply makes him an accessory to the fact. And is that to say, what, he didn't do the murder. He just helped the murderer get away. How is that a good thing? You know?

For Trump? He's being blackmailed by Israel or what? Two point two billion dollars solar plant in California is scheduled to be turned off. This is a solar plant which features three four hundred and fifty nine foot towers, thousands of computer controlled mirrors known as heliostats, and cost two point two billion dollars to build. This is a solar power facility that was set up not using the typical

photovill take cells that you see everywhere. This is set up to focus the sun's light and create this incredibly hot thing. When you look at the picture of it, I think they've got a picture for the down the article. You got these three glowing towers and it's like looking at Lord of the Rings. Which one of those is sour on en? I don't know. Construction began in twenty ten, was complete in twenty fourteen. Now it is set to close twelve years later after failing to efficiently generate social

solar energy. In twenty eleven, the US Department of Energy under Obama issued one point six billion and three federal loan guarantees for the project, and the Secretary of Energy at the time held it as an example of how America is becoming a world loser and solar energy no, he said, leader, Leader, Yeah, we're leading. We're on the cutting edge of shutting everything down and wasting massive amounts

of money to make sure that our grid isn't powered anymore. Look, the case for solar and for photogoll take cells is one of local individual off the grid, not to power the grid. Solar doesn't work well to power the grid, and again the grid has to be up twenty for seven. So unless you can put all your solar at the pole, at both poles, and you're going to switch it, you know, half of the year you got the no night on one of the poles, and then you go the other

half of the year to the other. And let's going to do something like that. It's ridiculous to think that you're going to power the grid with it. You have to get these massive battery backups which are going to burn everything down eventually. A symblematic of the profligate government spending in unwise bets. I'm poorly conceived, quickly howt dated technologies. It's indicative of central planning, folks. I've impau stands as a testament to the waste and the inefficiency of government

subsidized energy schemes. It never lived up to its promises. It produced less electricity than expected, while it had to rely on natural gas in order to stay operational when i've in Pop began operating in twenty fourteen, ranked as the world's largest solar plant. Located near the California Nevada border, sixty five miles southwest of Vegas, the plant's glowing towers are striking are as striking as some of the casinos

on the strip. The facilities five square miles of desert, were covered with some one hundred and seventy three thousand, five hundred heliostats adjusted via computer to catch maximum rays. The computer controlled mirrors can reflect light from the sun at temperatures that can reach one thousand degrees in part of the installment. As people have said about nuclear power plants, it's one hell of a way to boil water, very

complicated way to do it as well. And guess what happens to the birds that fly in the path of that beam.

scale up. It's not for the grid. It's got great use of the case for other small things decentralization.

sun is moving, all of these have a motor. There's thousands of these solar panels that need to be pointed at the exact correct position, and they all need to be clean all the time, as you see.

that's a simpler version of this. This is trying. They tried to hyper optimize this thing and scale it up, and it just doesn't scale up.

new scam. And of course many of these things were brought to you by Governor new Scam in California. That's what they should call him. What somebody called him new Scam or something. But I think new scam is probably the best way to approach you.

them to look out for an aggressive squirrel. I guess in San Francisco they don't even have baby guns.

So it acts like it's rabbit, right, except that squirrels are not vectors for rabies, So these women are not having to get raby shots, are just getting treated for all the cuts and lacerations that they had.

rabbit was guarding the cave. He be careful. The verer's this beast and all the land and they walk up and it's just a rabbit and they walk over and Shutters writes their head off. You know. Well, Washington is forcing speeding offenders to install GPS speed limitters. Eric Peters mentioned referred to some of this stuff yesterday because in the EU they are requiring it already on every new

car you have to get a GPS speed limiter. And I know because I had radar detectures that were trying to help me not speed, and so it would it had a GPS thing there. It knew what the speed limit was. If I was going to have the speed limit it would be, so I had to turn that thing off. But it was in Washington. If you're a repeat offender, anybody who's caught, Actually you don't have to be a repeat offender if you're caught driving twenty miles per hour over the limit on the highways or ten

miles per hour on a small road. So if it's a thirty mile an hour road and you're going forty, you got to pay to put one of these things on your car, like you would pay to put a breathalyzer on your car. If you are a repeat offender for trunk driving. They don't say though that you have to have multiple convictions for this. This could be the very first time attracts speed through the GPS electronically caps

the car's top speed. Offenders have to keep it installed for at least one hundred and twenty days or one hundred and fifty if convicted of reckless driving. Drivers get only three temporary bypasses a month before the limitter locks them down completely. Refusing to comply means more penalties and longer suspensions. While makers push the measure after twenty twenty three became the deadly year in Washington's roads in more

than three decades. Again, just like we're talking about with the guns, guns are not necessarily guns are not killing people. The people are killing people, right, And speed does not kill people either. We see the government putting out these signs all the time. Speed kills. Speed kills, No, it doesn't. Typically it is an attention. My own personal experience with this was I did a when I was in college. I did an internship, lived in Tampa and worked in

Saint Petersburg at a company that was there. And there was another person that was also at the same school in engineering, and she was also working there. We found that out and we said, well, it's just carpool. And the problem was is that Kathy had been in a severe car accident in her little Volkswagen Bug and she was just recovering. She had to take several semesters off

and she was just recovering. And I went with her in this drive from Tampa to Saint Pete a couple of times, and then I said that's okay, I'll just drive myself. I have never been more afraid in a car, and this is one of the slowest drivers I've ever been in the car with. She absolutely was spaced out, not paying attention, doing all other kinds of things, and I could see why she'd gotten in a car accident. It is in attention is the thing that kills. Speed

can make it worse. And fortunately she didn't speed. She drove extremely slowly because she really was not somebody who should be driving, and you should not be in the car with her. Europe Is are requiring these speed limiteds on all new cars. Critics see it as a dangerous precedent. Yes, taking control of how your car can move, but also not just how, but when your car can move and where your car can move. The government can control everything

about you. They are looking for complete control over every aspect of our life, and this is a very important freedom issue. The automobile is once activated, the limiture does not allow flexibility, emergencies, wide open highways, or personal judgment no longer matter. Other states are watching very closely, Virginia and DC, and of course in Virginia they don't need

that's the only state that bans radarchitectus. I had a rad architector that was confiscated by them once and learned my lesson there in virgin In here, freedom of the road could soon mean driving under electronic supervision the future were speed is no longer a choice. No, we're driving. There's no longer a choice. That is where this is ultimately headed. Well, let's take a look at the comments here and we'll take a break.

going to solve this. And you know, it is important to understand the government lied to you, and it is important to say, hell, this couldn't have happened, and that couldn't have happened, and that couldn't have happened. But when you look at the way that they're using it, that was the thing about nine to eleven. We knew that didn't know still don't know how they did that, but we know did not happen, and that is the official story, and we know what they used it for. It was

where they kicked off the surveillance and police state. And that's what we're going to be talking about when we come back. We're going to talk about the mark of the Beast and how the digital idea is now being mandated all over the place. Uecase coming up with that, and we'll talk about Peter Teel and his obsession and inversion of what he thinks the Antichrists as well. But we got more comments there before we take a break.

Why would the government keep evidence of their crimes? That's what I've been saying papers, Yeah, yeah, exactly, That's what I've been saying. I mentioned this before, but if I was in charge of the new CIA recruits every year, I just have them add more details into the JFK files every single year. All right, your CIA turn. Your job is to make up something kind of ridiculous, but not too ridiculous. So if this ever gets leaked, they're not gonna know. Like it just needs to be large,

it doesn't need to be real. Yeah, oh so, bogus Senator, Church of the Church Commission was black mailed.

both of those abominations. From the very beginning, they were spying on Americans illegally without search warrants, and that's why they came up with the PISA Court. That was the PISA came as the result of that. It wasn't initially about the assassinations. They used it to draw attention away from the real issue a spying on the American people illegally. But they didn't have any law that said you can't assassinate people. Trump does it and he brags about it

as being a great thing they came up. The end result of this thing was to prohibit them from spying on people, but they use that FISA structure to spy on people and to give them legal cover when they did it, so they never stopped. They continued doing it. It just gave them legal structure to do.

So again we're going to take a quick break and when we come back, we're going to take a look at the mark of the Beast according to Peter Thiel, and we're going to take a look at the actual mark that is are being rapidly deployed in the UK and elsewhere. We'll be right.

was ultra creepy. So if you want to see that thing, that's a tourist attraction too. They may have painted over it by now. Hopefully it was done as part of Obamacare. Believe it or not, you know it was in honor of Obamacare. We're gonna put Athena and she's rising up out of the city as like, are we.

and avoid having to get trapped inside it. And there's Homestead Products dot Chop, where again with promo code night you get ten percent off and the products are high quality, they're made in America.

the lyrics in there? Who do we get to sing? And it turns out although the space where people do mini instrument creation. Of course, this was always something that has been done for quite some time. Well, the first people to do it for TV was I think the guy who did the soundtrack for twenty four. He did everything himself. He composed it and used mini instruments and things like that for the show. But a lot of people are doing it for games and for TV shows.

They were using it. Some people just did it for their own compositions or to show the director of what it was going to sound like. If he liked it, then they would get an orchestra to do the final thing if it's a big budget movie or something. And that has been going on now for about twenty years and it got to be quite good. It's still a lot of work to try to get the different nuances of an instrument because they're constantly changing the way they

strike the note, for example. But now with the advent of AI, I guess it's because as souno, everybody can just go in and say, you know, give me this type of song and you know, this style and the sentimentation, and it just does everything for them. And so it's I guess it's really kind of amazing how quickly this all just disappeared. I mean, in the last six months,

it's just disappeared. People who had big production libraries that they've been working on for a year all of a sudden just went, you know, just just went dark, and there's no more news about it. So it's kind of

an instant antique form of making music anymore. But I still like it, and one thing that has come out that's good of AI is that always in the past, people go in and they would make a library of they get into a really good sound auditorium or something like that stage and or it might be a cathedral, and they would record a huge choir, right, and so

that'd be one of things that brag on. This is one hundred and fifty person choir, and that has a very unique sound when you get that many people singing. But the problem was is that they were all saying or humming or whatever, and so you couldn't get them to actually say anything. And now with AI, they don't have the big choirs like that yet, but they do have AI that you can actually program and find detuned the detail, which is very different than what you get

if you do something for video. If you take an image and turn it into video, it's kind of random what you're going to get hit or miss. You can't really control these things very well. They don't take direction very well. That's getting better, but it's still not quite there. Some of them you can now get more continuity and

you can add items to it. I haven't played around with it enough to know if what the current state of the art is with that, but that's been a big problem, and so you'd have to do pass after pass after pass them maybe you get something that was

kind of what you wanted that you could use. But with the audio of the singing, you can play the notes that you want and then you can type in the lyrics that you want, and then it will make it first pass with some of the voices that are in its library, and if that isn't what you want, you can go in and just how it sings on a note by note basis. You can make it very soft, or you can make it belt it out, or you can add vibrato or take vibroado out, so you can

fine tune it on a note by note basis. And so that's something I've been playing around with and hope to be able to use that soon. I'll play I'll bring the song in that I've done and play for you sometime. Yeah, maybe a Christmas who knows, because the song is about John. First one I got finished was a song that I did be twenty years ago this

Thanksgiving about John. One in the beginning was the orders with God and the word was God, and so I thought, you know, for us Christmas is about the incarnation, so I'd be releasing that maybe Christmas time.

all the efficiency of that panel. It's the amount of maintenance needed for these things.

And it's a constant thorn in my side because every time I see a possum, I want to go pick it up. It's like, oh, come here, buddy, we could be friends. Original babe. How will the city ever make any money without speeding that's the question. What will the police be doing. They'll have to find other things to harash you for.

Now you've really got the government top of your motor with electronics. It's just crazy.

it inside of the app. Now a lot of that stuff is internalized in some of the radarchitectures as well. But that's a great app, you know. And yeah, people can even call in and warn others where the cops are waiting for people. There's a speed trip made the science out of it when I was in.

over and let somebody pass. It's not for just hanging out in the left lane, so he called him left lane bandits here.

play it again right now. But the Ukraine twenty thirty video where they've got this happy person saying, now we got an app and we've got digital ID and you can use this when you go to the Department of Motor Vehicles or when you pay your taxes over here where you fill out this license form or this or that, and it's all. You know, we're going to expedite your dealing with the government, or we're going to make it impossible for you to deal with the government. They said, well,

this is Prime Minister hair Starmer. I think you should have a German name. There's Starmer. Yeah, it's like Haircross. Claus is set to announce that all working adults in the UK will be required to have government issued digital ID. What about the people on welfare? You know, all citizens have to have it, but maybe not the other people who are coming in and getting welfare. I don't know. I mean when you look at how they rolled this thing out in India with Bill Gates, he used it

for the poorest people. He used it for the people who were on welfare, who were on you know, getting government healthcare and that type of thing. You're not going to get that unless you take the ID.

of it. When DeSantis was running, he was boasting about how he's going to fix illegal aliens coming here to take your jobs, using everify and making it now mandatory. It's been around for a long time, you know, I've had these things that have been here in America, like real id and everify. Now is the time that the American government, which has left these things out say oh, okay, you don't have to have it, we just have it here. Now they're declaring it to be mandatory. And the same

thing is happening in the UK. And why are they doing this and why do you have most of the people in support of it. Well, because they created a problem with open borders here in the US, just like in the UK. And in the UK this is being perceived by the people who should oppose. It's being perceived as a solution to the government created problem of open borders.

New plans which Starmar will unveil today are hoped to help tackle levels of illegal immigration, make it easier to identify if a person can live and work in the UK, whether a citizen or those on visas. The so called brit Card would be shown when starting a new job, when it'd be checked in large database of people entitled to work in the UK. This is precisely the same thing this rabid socialist globalist Hair Starmer is doing exactly the same thing in the UK the Conservative Republicans have

done here. If you don't see that this is a globalist agenda and if you don't see who's on the globalist team from this, yeah, we know they're all doing the same thing. This is the pandemic stuff all over again. And of course when the pandemic stuff was out there, you had Tony Blair saying, you know, the vaccine ID was where they were moving the overturn window in people's minds about how this is going to be necessary.

to liberty. Vaccination is going to be in the end, You'll root to liberty. So you're hearing it's a constraint on your liberty, You've got to go and get vaccinated.

right to rent. Here we go. This is very much Soviet style, right, you don't do what the government likes, said Sosie and Insindia. When you talked about do not live by life, he says, yes, we understand. They can take away your job, they can kick you out of your home, but he must not be afraid. And even if to keep your job and to keep your home you lie. Just don't ever believe it. Don't ever believe

those lies. And that's the issue with the MAGA people is that they are engaging in double think in order to stay into this club they think they belong in. But anyway, that's nothing new. This is Soviet style, folks. You're not going to be able to work or rent unless the government approves of you, whether you're either a citizen or a foreign national. And it appears a digital ID will be mandatory for any working adult in the UK. Their driver's license would also be on the app. Again,

this is Ukraine twenty thirty. Okay, the war's over, we won, and now we've got this ID that follows us everywhere. And that's what you're fighting for. You're fighting so that you can be under the kind of tyranny that they used China as a beta test site for, with hopes that the app could be used to order a passport, to access health services, or to display your National insurance number. So and they say it could also help a visa overstayers.

In other words, they're throwing this out after they've done everything to advantage people who come to the UK, especially those who come illegally. We're going to have a two tier system, that's going to put them in the top tier. You're on the bottom. And now they say the people on the bottom that they have made second class, the citizens that they've made second class. Well, this is going to be your ticket to getting out of this goolog

that we put you into. Britain right now is the only country in Europe without an ID card, and those in the EU that are able to travel around the block with one instead of a passport. I don't know though that they have to have an ID card in order to get a job in the EU. I don't know about that. But the countries that have a digital idea already, the EU, China, Costa Rica, Singapore, South Korea, UAE, Canada,

I don't know. We have some Canadian listeners here. I mean, do you have to have an ID card in Canada to get a job? Japan and India? Of course India. Tony Blair that you just saw that attempted to introduce compulsory ID cards into thousand and six after the seven to seven bombings, only for it to be scrapped. Labored Together estimates that it will cost four hundred million pounds to build the EID system and ten million pounds to run the free to use phone app.

nine to eleven. Privacy groups have long criticized the idea of Big Brother Watch in the UK, telling them that the mandatory digital ID cards are dystopian. Of course, the evidence from countries with established digital ID systems show that it won't reduce irregular migration. If they've got it all in all the countries in the EU, then obviously it does not address immigration. But they will tell you that remember that Americans, when the Republicans come to you trying

to sell this stuff. It's not going to stop illegal immigration.

as physical cash. Any system should be designed with the purpose of helping people to assess vital services like healthcare, providing our identity more easily, not by creating barriers or shutting people out. I don't see a use case for anybody having any ID for anything except for voting. If you want to participate in this charade, then go get an ID. If they aren't going to check voter IDs and they want to check your ID to do everything else,

what does that tell you? So fifty four percent of the people told you GOV in twenty twenty three that they would back mandatory identity cards. Most people in the UK haven't been keen however, on hair Starmer's Plans two and three have concerns regarding the security of their personal data as well, because you know, if you've got biometric data and somebody hacks a database, you can't get a new face or fingerprints presumably, so there is going to

be a digital ID protest. I want to show this to people because I know we have some people who listen in the UK Mass compliance protest Central London one pm tomorrow I'm sorry, not tomorrow, eighteenth of October, so keep that in mind. You'll probably see more of this resist digital ID. They fear the people most when we stand together, and the people did show up with that gigantic protest called Unite the Kingdom that was put together

by Tommy Robinson. So this would be a good time for people to stand up and may be your last chance. Otherwise you get a black mark on your ID card and they will use this traffic light system to stop you, just like doing Channa. That's where they want to go. They use China as their beta test site. They design what they want to do, the implement it in China and work out the bugs on this thing. So two out of three have concerns regarding the security of their

personal data. They should have that as a concern. A petition already has been signed by more than one hundred and thirty hundred people that says we think this would be a step towards mass surveillance and digital control, and that no one should be forced to register with a state controlled ID system. It adds ID cards were scrapped in twenty ten and in our view it was done for good reason, absolutely absolutely case. Well, they've also put

up this meme about the digital ID. We created the problem, now we're offering the solution. And they've got cartoon caricatures there of King Charles and Hair Starmer, Tony Blair, Bill Gates and Klaus Hair Klaus a digital euro Meanwhile, is this is an article coming out from the European Central Bank, and the person there is Piero Sibaloni. He's an executive board member. He's pushing the European Central Bank and the European CBDC. They are so far gone that they don't

even bother to rebrand CBDC. You know, that's when you know things are really bad. It's bad enough when Trump and his cabal are setting up functionally equivalent with the stable coins, but at least they're concerned enough about public opinion that they change the name from CBDC, even if it retains the same dystopian features as the CBDC does. But in Europe they can just call it a CBDC

and nobody really cares about that anymore. It's this is a country that is on assisted suicide, and the people who are assisting them are people like Harrik Klaus and Ursula fond of lying. They're more than happy to assist Europeans and suicide. The European Union is long planned Central Bank Digital Currency Project CBDC. It's facing delays, with its launch now expected around mid twenty twenty nine. So it isn't whether or not it's going to happen by the

timeframe in which is going to happen. So I think it's going to happen about the middle of twenty twenty nine, which is still just in time for their planned twenty thirty dystopia. They're smart cities and everything else. The European Parliament has been the biggest obstacle to progress progress with a digital euro as it must pass legislation to move forward with a project, we should arrive at a general approach, as they call it, an agreement among member states by

the end of this year. Parliament is likely to have a position on a digital Euro by May of next year. It's very very close, Sipoloni said. European authorities are pressing ahead with the CBDC preparations, with the European Central Bank targeting October to decide whether to move to the next phase. What do you think the chances of that are. It's been five years in the making. They began rolling it out guess when in twenty twenty, and it was right

before all this stuff hit. It was an October of sorry, it already hit in early twenty I'm thinking for a second, they're twenty nineteen. No. In October twenty twenty, the Digital Euro project emerged as one of Europe's long standing financial initiatives. By twenty twenty three, the European Commission published a legal proposal for it, yet progress with the Parliament has remained limited. China launched a pilot digital yuan wallet in early twenty

twenty two. However, the digital Yuan has encountered slow adoption, with critics describing many CBDCs as costly replicas of Fiat currency rather than genuine fintech innovations. So again, it's not a out what they say it is about. It's still another form of digital ida and control. So that brings us to Peter Teel, who is always talking, it seems, anymore, about the Antichrist, or at least how he imagines an

Antichrist's coming and what he has done. And I've mentioned this before, but it's come up yet again because now he's holding his four part lecture series on it, which is closed to the public, and if anybody releases some details, that person is in trouble with the establishment there in Silicon Valley. Look say, well, what's their enforcement mechanism. Somebody did publish their notes after the first day, and that person got a severe tongue lashing and their ticket revoked

for the next three days. But I think, as somebody who is a mover and shaker, a CEO in Silicon Valley, you do not want to get on the bad side of the PayPal mafia and the PayPal mafia's godfather, who is Peter. I think that is the biggest a turn. I think that there is some enforcement issues to be had there. Peter Thiel claims an a lecture about religion that the devil promises peace and safety by strangling technological

progress with regulation. Know, the problem is is that when they point this out in this article, is that the government is always promising peace and safety for everything that they do. And it's not just because they're not just promising peace and safety with regulation of artificial intelligence. And I think without any regulation of artificial intelligence, there isn't going to be any peace or safety. But that's something

that the government wants with that. But everything that the government does, they always promise you safety, and they promise you that if you just give up your liberty, they will make you safe, and it's never true and you don't deserve it even if you were to get it, but you never do get it. The Ministry of Defense in the UK is going to spend three quarters of a billion dollars unpalanteer and so this is how AI

is going to be used. As this report at the Times The London Times, teal donor to trump mentor to Vance said that fearing or regulating promising technology and scientific progress, including an AI, risked courting the devil, going to the Wall Street Journal, which cited people who attended the event. The Times has previously reported on Teal's devout Christian views. Well, he may be devout in it, but they are not Christian views by any stretch of the imagination. I mean,

not everybody even believes that there is an Antichrist. The spirit of Antichrist's opposition to Christ, that's always there everywhere, but certainly nobody envisions the people who envision and individual Antichrist do not envision it at all. Like Peter Teel, and he was even called out in some of these interviews. It sounds like what you're describing as you it sounds like you're just driving yourself. Teal is in the midst of delivering a sold out series of lectures on the Antichrist.

With his spend with his reimagination. They have an organization there, as I've mentioned before, Acts seventeen Collective. The Acts is not the Acts of the Bible. It is acknowledging Christ

and technology and society. Founded last year by Michelle Stevens, wife of Trey Stevens, who is a partner of Teals in his Founder's fund venture capital firm Stevens is also a co founder of Androil Industries, which makes them sells autonomous weapons systems with Lucky Palmer, right, and so he is at These guys are at the center of everything that I think will be used to create a government

beast type of oppression. The talks were marketed as off the record, but a guest of the first four talks published notes on the first lecture on his personal website. His post has since been removed, but was picked up by the San Francisco Standard and reportedly said that Teo argued that because we're increasingly concerned about existential threats, the time is ripe for the Antichrist to rise the power promising peace and safety by strangling technological progress with regulation.

Let me tell you, Christ did not come for technological progress. This guy does not have a clue as to what he's talking about. Jesus did not come for a kingdom of this earth, let alone for technological progress. That's not why he came and died.

these Silicon Valley executives, I guess as well. Teal has previously warned against the emergence of an individual or a system that can exploit fears of global catastrophe driven by AI to enforce a one world to solitary and state that underminds human freedom. So it's trying to protect us from this thing that Altman and so many people have been out there saying AI is going to kill us all, it's going to rule us all it's going to kill us all. If you try to do anything to stop that,

then you are the bad guy. You are the Antichrist, because you know, Jesus is all about technology. Trump and Teal are using AI to supercharge the surveillance state. That's the real issue, and that's the real threat, the real threat. In my opinion, it's not that AI is going to become this thinking machine. It's not thinking at all. It's using a statistical correlation to come up with things that sound like it's thinking, but it is not thinking and it will never be like a human being. We have

created the image of God, not AI. But the real danger is the evil people who are creating the image of God using this tool as a tool of surveillance. It is able, and I said this from the very beginning. When you look at what AI is able to do, it is able to sort through vast mountains of data to find the needle in that haystack. And that's what's really dangerous about it. They've always used this When we would get file requests for information, what they would do

is they would tip it. We dumped so much information on it so we couldn't find anything, and it's like Hey, it's all there. I complied with it. You just can't find it because it's just a little tiny needle on astack. But with AI you can do that. And you take a look at how Pulty at the FAHA has weaponized AI, and he bragged about it. That's how he found I think it was that Lutissa James who has some suspect mortgage stuff. But that's how they came after Lisa Cook,

the Federal Reserve governor. They used AI to find it. I said, this is stalin esque. Bring me the man, or in this case, the black woman, and I'll find the crime. That's what the tyrants have always done, and now they can do that with AI. You got somebody want to get out because of some reason, stift through their life, audit everything in their life for the most minor infractions. And of course is silver Gate said, you know, we all commit three phone news a day because there's

so much stuff that's on the books. My speculative, Lisis said Teal, is that if the Antichrist were to come to power, it would be by talking about armageddon all the time, which is what he does. The greatest danger we face, according to Tel, might not be from global warming, terrorism, nuclear winter, or AI going rogue. The real danger is that we're afraid of these threats, so afraid that we're willing to give up our freedom in the interest of

peace and safety. Well, that's a political remedy, not something that Christ was about. Of course, Christ was about casting out fear. Fear is the opposite of faith, but in terms of the exchange of vital liberty or dangerous liberty, exchanging that for the promise of peace and safety. The founders all warned us about that. He said, I feel like the Antichrist would maybe be using the tools that you are building, said the person who was interviewing him.

Ross Duethought on a podcast raring course to Pallunteer, which again, as as mentioned, they have a three quarter of a billion dollar contract with the UK, but they're heavily involved in the US as well. It's equipping government with tools to set through massive data troves to identify patterns, hunt down illegal immigrants. It's also helping the FEDES deploy facial recognition technology and has created AI tools to predict where

crimes might happen in advance. That was the other thing that's interesting, you know, because the acronym that they used for that was also AI, but that AI was anticipatory intelligence, and Polunteer has been heavily involved in that first abroad and then those instruments of tyranny, as Madison Warren have been brought home. Anticipatory intelligence has been used in a lot of places with law enforcement, for example, to predict crime pre crime, and it's all about geospatial intelligence and

profiling people, especially over their religious political beliefs. Person said like, wouldn't Antichrist be great? We're not going to have any more technological progress, but I really like what Volunteer has done so far, said to thought. To Teal, he says, isn't that a concern? Wouldn't that be the irony of history that the man publicly worrying about the Antichrist accidentally hastens his or her arrival and or is that person or enacts all the things that he said that person

would do. When Teal replied that hastening the Antichrist's arrival is obviously not what he thinks he's doing, the interviewer agreed that it was unlikely, but he still pressed. He said, well, I'm just interested in how you get to a world

that is willing to submit to permanent authoritarian rule. While Peter Teel was warning that the Antichrist could be totalitarianism by exploiting our desire for peace and safety, the company that he co founded is building the tools with great potential for abuse by tutulitarian savelist state, all based on our desire for peace and safety. This is the circular logic, the inverted logic of all this, and that is pointed out by Reason magazine. As I talked about the Yes.

Remember that I've talked about this many times, and I've talked about the role of the secret societies that control our government. The CIA and the rest of these that are used their venture capital funding to push this stuff through. Here's the story about how they did it with Palateer. Total information Awareness was what Palateer is now, says Reason magazine. All this stuff, at the end of the day is

fear based. That's how we get a lot of this surveillance mentality, said Eddington, a former CIA analyst who is now with the libertarian Cato Institute. His latest book is The Triumph of Fear. He said. Total Information Awareness was an initiative that was started at DARPA. The stated goal was to construct I'm sorry here, construct a virtual, centralized grand database for tracking terrorists, the same kind of database that Trump wants to build to track illegal immigrants. And

they can just easily repurpose it to everybody right. Public backlash to the unnerving name led to a rebranding before Unger's defunded the program in two thousand and three. Yeah, they rebranded it as Facebook, and then they reinvented it as Polateer. Total Information Awareness lived on under the innocuous code name Basketball. And you know, actually Facebook was not total Information Awareness Facebook was Lifelog, the Lifelog program, We're going to keep a record of everything you do in

your life. Palleteer was actually very closely Total Information Awareness. Later they continued on and called it basketball and it was absorbed by the NSA, not the NBA, which Ed Snowden would later reveal was collecting the phone records of millions of Americans and intercepting web traffic without the knowledge of the companies involved, which is what I was talking about before. James Clapper knew that, and he lied to the American people about that, but he was never charged

with poetry. But we're going to go after Cami because what he lied about affected Trump personally, and that's all that Trump cares about. The same year the Congress dedfan on hundred Total Information Awareness, Peter Teel and his co founders created Palateer. They even met with John Poindexter, the recently fired director of Total Information Awareness, who told them

that they had an interesting idea quote unquote. Initially, the company struggled to attract mainstream investment, but when the CIA's venture capital arm Incutel put in two million dollars, it signaled interest from Washington and the company took off. Today Pollunteer is worth more than four hundred billion, with a b over half of its revenue coming from government contracts. So ink, tell how.

life went wrong and all this stuff. The biggest thing for him, he said, that really took him down was crack cocaine. Remember who created crack cocaine, So that was the CIA, And they even set up Freeway Ricky Ross to run all the stuff through it. They invented crack cocaine, they sold it in LA and in other places and then used the money for their secret wars and who knows what else personally using it as well. So ink, you tell that they would always do these types of

things in secret. And of course when we talk about the scourge of drugs, just understand that the drug war has not done anything. The drug war has destroyed the rule of law, destroyed law enforcement, destroyed the judiciary, and is now being used to drag us into an actual war. But the people who have created some of the most virulent forms of these drugs are our own government itself. When the creation of Crackcoa came by the CIA, to the guarding and the expansion of the poppy fields in

Afghanistan is our own government. Let's put the biggest drug pusher out there. So when you look at Incutel, they actually went public with their own venture capital firm because they wanted to help people that they knew they would be able to control, to create the Internet, because the Internet was a tool of control also created by DARPA,

you know, not just the total information awareness thing. I know many of you have heard this before, but it bears repeating and we need to memorize this and get it out to other people so they understand what's really going on. How this is a long range plan. All of this ICE is now using mobile facial detection technology to track immigrants and to tie their identities to derogatory information. Oh next Week can use it for people that say

something about Charlie kirk right. The agency also uses Clearview AI facial recognition tape that scrapes social media, and much of the data is managed by Palanteer. As a matter of fact, Clearview has got a lot of contracts with law enforcement in Louisiana and many other places. But I remember they had a big deal about it in Louisiana. Even if you support Trump's objective to deport more immigrants, you should still be concerned about this technology and how

it's being used. That's why I say, yeah, we don't want to have illegal immigrants and we don't want to have drugs. But look at the way that they're approaching this problem. You know, there's other ways to approach it. And these ways are just like they say, well, get a digital ID because we've got a problem of illegal immigrants. Well you created that problem, and the digital ID is not going to stop the problem either. It's going to be another means of control that's going to be yet

another problem. And that's what they constantly are doing with these things, like many surveillans tools of the past, immigrants and foreigners are fertile testing ground before it is rolled out to the wider domestic population. People on the Republican side should really not be cheering about this stuff that's going on right now, because if Democrats manage to retake the White House and both Chambers of Commerce, and time makes that inevitable, then they could turn around and use

those same tools, says Eddington. And by the way, that's exactly what my own work in this book basically shows that it is bipartisan, the MAGA movement, and it's bipartisan. Both parties want this, but both parties will use this against the other side, so the other side will scream and make people think that they're against it and they're not. The MAGA movement should understand what it's like to walk

under the gaze of the eye of Sarhan. After the January sixth riot, right wing extremism became a priority for America's intelligence agencies. Online censorship reached that zenith under the Biden administration, which leaned on social media companies to suppress

speech that criticized COVID policies or questioned election integrity. Eddington says that since its inception, federal law enforcement has been weaponized to go after not just criminals, but political dissonance, which FBI did with their co Intel pro program of the fifties and sixties. It's easy to imagine how the technology that Palateer is building to help the government keep tabs on terrorists and illegal immigrants in the interest of

peace and safety could be applied more broadly. And this is especially true when I continue to come back to Trump's actions against these alleged and then they are ledged, not proven drug runners in Venezuela, just just killing them on site. Be careful. That's going to be used in a lot of different ways. He's setting up a precedent for that. This is a guy who believes that the military should be used in law enforcement. That is as

un American as you can get. Snowden has predicted that governments will soon use the AI enhanced to aveillance not merely to fight terrorism or to port immigrants, but to

shape behavior. We are all entering a new phase of history where what we considered the more enlightened collection of states globally are now some of those working the hardest to roll it back to bureaucratize, to influence, to nudge, to shape, to ultimately control each and every individual within their territory and beyond, said Snowden at a conference in

Singapore last year. So Western civilization that used to talk about and value the issues of privacy and liberty and dignity and freedom that they have now become so drunk with power that this massive expanse of Babylon is now using it to try to attack each and every individual. Teal is also worried about AI. He says, if you were to say that crypto is libertarian, then why can't

we say that AI is communist? Said Teal. So even though he's worried that this is going to get this backlash against AI is going to be used to set up an authoritarian government, he admits that AI is a big problem. He says, it's not completely inherent in it, but it's a certain tendency in it. And while I am pro acceleration and I'm pro tech, I'm even pro AI. It is probably the one technology that I have the most misgivings about Alex s. Carp CEO of Polleteer, gave

the technology to the Ukrainian military free of charge. He said, the goal should be to make sure that these tools are in the hands of the good guys. This is a guy who names his companies after Tolkien's story but evidently didn't understand it, and he really doesn't if you read his book, and I mentioned that I did a

substack thing on where this guy is coming from. It truly is frightening to see somebody with his worldview have as much money and power as he does, and to think that, you know, he can wield it and not be corrupted by it. He's not going to fall into the same trap as Bormir or Gladriel right now. He can handle it or Gollum, and he can handle that ring of power. It's not a temptation to him at all. Well, if you read his book, I think you can already

see that he is goalam already. We were asked if we were willing to supply our product for free to Ukraine. I was very in favor of this because our goal is to set a global standard for the world for behavior and to monitor behavior he said this, by the way. He said this, by the way, at the World Economic Forum in twenty twenty three, that he's going to start

a global standard for behavior. John Joe Lonsdelle, a Pounteer co founder, previously told Reason that the company actually was formed to protect civil liberties, as it aids the government in catching terrorists. Yeah right, yeah, all these people who are fighting the war on terror, they were really about civil liberties from the name, weren't they. Peter Thiel has warned it's easy to go from the frying pan into the fire. Tools designed for hunting down illegal immigrants or

combatants in Gaza or Ukraine can be repurposed. Maybe he read Madison and the Lord of the Rings, says Reason, the wizard Sarman starts on the side of good. The villainous Siren manipulates him to the Pounteer Stone to make the wizard believe that he sees the future where Siren's evil plan triumphs. But it's all a deception. Well, you can't trust anything except the real Bible. Don't get pulled in. I don't know none of you. We get pulled into

the absurdity of Peter Thiel's new spin on Christianity. But that is what he's doing, and it is a very dangerous thing that's going to be pulling in some of these powerful movers and shakers who are not interested in Christ, They're not interested in God. They're not interested, of course, then in any ethics or morality. Meanwhile, Trump is pushing yet another UN agenda, and this is the one used

to use AI to enforce bioweapons ban. How many times does Trump have to jump in and become the leader of the UN agenda, grab the football and run it down the field for the UN, for the World Economic Forum before MAGA catches on. I don't think they'll ever catch on. So he' said the president who has this is New American and they're right. He is a self styled critic of globalism because he is not actually working

against globalism. He loves all of these globalist agendas. He loves the UN, he loves what the World Health Organization was doing with the lockdowns and pandemics. He's just playing lip service to opposing it. So the President, a self styled critic of globalism, nevertheless urged the globalist body with planetary ambitions that would be the UN to play a constructive role in developing this far reaching project. He framed it as an urgent necessity. The catastrophic potential, he said,

of terrible biological and nuclear weapons, is clear. Their proliferation, Trump argued, threatens nothing less than the end of the world and makes action imperative. Well, this is Trump invoked the devastating COVID pandemic. See, this is part of the fruit of his lab lie that he and his nudge have been pushing, and now everybody's into it because it gives them an alibi for the past. It gives them an incentive for the things that they want to do in the future. If you believe that this all came

out of the lab. It did come out of the lab. The vaccine came out of the lab, not the alleged pandemic that is out there. But if he can sell that, he said, yeah, this is quote the result of a reckless experiment overseas. Well, that's the lie, right, And the question is if you believe that was the case, If you really believe that, if it came out of a lab and we were funding it and it could destroy

all of humanity, why are you still funding it? You know, all of this gain of function, playing around and everything with deadly and dangerous diseases that was all exposed as

something that was risky with very little benefit. In twenty fourteen, Alison Young The USA Today ran a great series of articles talking about all the accidents that have been at the CDC, diseased animals that released in the wild, diseases that these scientists are playing around with, and they had faulty equipment, and on and on and on, and so

they shut that down in twenty fourteen. Well, Fauci and Fancist Collins continued to do it on their own initiative and defiance of Congress shifting money to that, and so we all know that story. The person who started it back up in twenty seventeen was Trump. One of the first things he did when he got back into office, the Trump administration restarted this program that he says created COVID that was so horrible, and he hasn't stopped it yet.

So again, everything the man does is exactly the opposite of what he says. You have to watch what he does, not what he says. He described this the COVID pandemic as a result of reckless experiments overseas quote unquote, the virus itself proved far less destructive than the early coordinated global response that shattered economies and societies, says the New American And they're right. The president who oversaw America's own

COVID response warrened quote. Despite the worldwide catastrophe, many countries are continuing extremely risky research like your own. You're the one who restarted it, and you keep doing it. Just amazing what this guy can get away with and to bio weapons and man made pathogens. He said this must stop, and yet what is he doing. He's multiplying the mRNA drugs that are out there and helping people like Larry Elson push this forward. Look, that's the real bioweapon that's

out there, right there in your face. All this stuff about Fauci and the wu Han lab, that's not the real danger. The real dangers all these mRNA drugs that they're putting out there. What data would ai rely on, who would control it, what oversight would exist, and perhaps most crucial, how can this new system be trusted when not a single person has ever been held accountable for the risky experiments behind COVID. Even if you go with their narrative about the lab leak. Nobody has ever been

held accountable for it. All of them will say, oh, it's Fatchi or is this person that, But they don't do anything Fauci. The Biological Warfare Convention that was signed in nineteen seventy two bans the development of bioweapons, tells you everything you need to know to know that they haven't done anything about that. Right, it has no teeth, unlike nuclear Chemical Weapons Treatise that offers no inspectors, no

monitoring body, no enforcement mechanism. States have long complained that it is very easy to sign and easier to ignore. So Trump didn't have any details in this. So the New American says, so, but what would this really look like? Right? The devil is in the details. What would the details look like? If you're going to have a globalist body, which is why the UN wants this, It's what Trump is selling, we need to create some global oversight body. Well,

what are they going to do? How are they going to do oversight if they don't have sight into everything that we're seeing? Right, like polataire, I'm sure polunteer will have a role in this. In theory, it would serve as a vast digital sentinel, collecting signals from many sources and flagging suspicious activity. AI could scan genomic databases for unusual sequences, suggesting that there might be engineered pathogens. It

could sift wastewater hospital records in public health reports. This is what they're doing with a PCR testing of sewerage water. It doesn't tell you anything. It's just used as a device to create fear and to excuse to solitarian actions. So just let they go around doing PCR sewerage stuff. That's the way this thing is going to be used. But they will have the pretext that it is real, that it is science, and as part of that pretext, it's going to demand absolute and total surveillance of anything

and everyone. So drone imagery, satellite and drone imagery could be fed into algorithms trained to spot new labs or unusual construction, procurement and supply chains would have to be monitored. It would be another target of this globalist organization. AI could comb customs filings, research papers, commercial gene synthesis orders to direct attempts at buying equipment or DNA sequences suited for weaponization. All these inputs could then be fused into

a single anomaly detection dashboard. Instead of inspectors knocking on doors, AI would do the watching constantly globally invisibly. There's your total information awareness, folks. That's what Trump is pushing. He's pushing a globalist surveillance network right to their face, and they don't understand it. So infuriating to see how blind these people are and willingly blind as they cheer him. And I'm disgusted with the organizations like Breitbart Info Wars

that push all this stuff for him. They're out there putting the blinders on their readers, putting the masks on their faces, stabbing them in the back. The dangers are real, and algorithms make mistakes. If an algorithm points to a lab and sparks a political storm, who's responsible if the claim is wrong? Well, there's no accountability for all this stuff,

as we saw with twenty twenty. In conclusion, and I agree with this conclusion by the New American they said a global AI verification system may be sold being sold by Trump as protection from catastrophe, but it risks cementing something that is far worse, a permanent regime of surveillance and control on a planetary scale. That's what Donald Trump is here to sell. You don't buy it. It's just disgusted me.

But look, there's even a CIA document that came out that mister Morley pointed out that actually said that the CIA new or bought the lone gunman theory, and so I think the American people had an inclination as to what we were saying.

to the public. It's important not just for our investigations. But so the American people know the truth as to what happened with John F.

that were the case. I mean, can certainly believe that the Mockingbird media would do whatever the CIA told them. I just can't believe that they would keep it.

a specification that talks about the shade of red. I mean, we're not just talking about matching this thing up so they can scan it in. But it's got to be this particular shade of red, and it's got to be this it's got to be that. They will charge you like three hundred dollars a report that you submit and so you know that's the way they'll do this kind of stuff. So your only option then, if you don't have that magic piece of paper that they have specified

out the wazoo, then you have to do it electronically. Yeah, if you electronically, you got to go through all their ID verification, all the rest of this stuff as well.

So they had people all over her. She wound up marrying an East German guy, so she could stay there, and you know, but she never got past the suspicion of the East German Stazi. So they had all these informants, and she said, when they released these files after the unification of East and West Germany, she saw that all of her neighbors were informing on her. All these people she thought were her friends were really informing on her. They had like half of the country informing on the

other half. That's why I think it's so despicable for Jadie Vance to be doing that. You see somebody saying something you don't like about Charlie Kirk, call their employer, get them fired, you know. And this is a Stazi mentality that is there. It's absolutely disgusting.

You should be able to buy me several hundred. Those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful, I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various gallas and social events. If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA.

role in the film was to undress. So the role of this Ursula is to lie. That's what she does all the time. Well, AI's goot a role. And uh, it is kind of interesting to watch these robots that are combined with AI. It really is horrific. Now AI can control a robot even if its legs get chainsawed off. They said, we built a robot brain that nothing can stop. It keeps adapting to whatever happens. So if this thing's coming after you, you blow the legs off, it'll keep

moving to come after. Here is he changed us off the legs and the thing starts hobbling around on the nubs that it's got there, and it's going to still come after you, maybe not as well. Might saw it down a little bit, but it's going to keep counting, so it runs out of juice. Robots are being kicked, punched, shoved, even dragged by a chain around the neck. We're going

to sign up for this job. You might get paid to do that instead of put in jail, all in an apparent effort to teach them how to adapt to the cruel physical world around them. In the latest instance of a robot being brutalized video making its rounds on social media. That you're seeing right there, says an engineer from a startup called Skilled AI, taking a chainsaw to the limbs of a robot dog. We built a robot

brain that nothing can stop, shattered limbs, jammed motors. If the bot can move, the brain will move it, even if it's an entirely new robot body. The video is disconcerting as it is impressive, showing the effectiveness of AI that can seemingly be dropped into pretty much any robot body, even a severely mutilated one, and still adapt and move even with all of its four limbs lopped off, the robodog starts to hobble around almost immediately, albeit in a

less dignified way. We created a universe with one hundred thousand different robots and trained our AI to control them all. To the company, we were often surprised with its ability to adapt to scenarios that are very different from what it saw at training time. The company showed off its new robot brain's ability to respond to a variety of different scenarios such as a loss of limbs, broken legs, jamm wheels, are being forced to walk on stilts. You saw that there as well.

been around for a long time. The robot arms that are connected to a base that are going to be welding parts on an automobile assembly line or something like that. These are not the things that we have to worry about unless you get in there while this thing is working. The just recently had somebody that was killed by one of those robot arms.

fully automated. You know, they'll be able to do some things in terms of moving material around that make it a little bit more difficult for some of these other, maybe more highly specialized robots. But that's what it's really about. And as I said, they're not going to bring they're not going to onshore manufacturing unless they can do it to replace workers with robots. What you say, Lance, I just.

The government has used public capital and policy directives to spur Chinese companies to become leaders in robotics. Well, they better hope that they're better on investing their money in robotics than they did in terms of real estate and construction. You see the pictures on YouTube. You can find them on YouTube, These vast cities and developments that have just

been left and abandoned. I mean, you have these amazing mansions that have been built in some places, and some of these guys will go in and there's just a little bit of security that's there, but not much, and they'll sneak into these buildings which are now being overgrown with vines and mildew and all the rest of this stuff. And they truly were unbelievable mansions that they built and malinvestment that they've had there. Because that's what governments always do.

China has just taken all of these issues to the most radical extreme that we've ever seen before. Worldwide robots and AI are playing an increasingly prominent disruptive role in manufacturing. Factory robots range from machines that can weld car parks together to claws that lift boxes onto conveyor belts. Factories in China have installed more than one hundred and fifty thousand robots each year since twenty seventeen, so that's eight

years of that. The manufacturing output has therefore ballooned, and by the start of this year, factories in China were making nearly a third of all manufactured goods worldwide. They make more manufactured goods than the United States, Germany, and Japan, South Korea and Britain combined, and it's only going to get more so that way, because they have now been given exclusive access to cheap energy that is not going

to be available in any of those other countries. Overall, China has five times as med robots and factories as the United States. The Federation's data does not include humanoid robots. The humanoids startup unitary robotics. The latest space of humanoid robots are priced at about six thousand dollars in China. By the way, Lance, do you have that clip that you showed me of the robots that were boxing.

amazing thing I guess that they had. And so they were about to start the event, and they had this really really tiny, skinny cowboy that was out there and he was sting the gate, and that robot reminded me of him. He's out there, he's got like he's crouched like he's riding a horse or something, and he's going yeah, yeah, and arm up in the air, and we looked at him.

We all just started rolling laughing in the stadium, and that he was the first one out of the gate, and unfortunately he was not somebody who was a real cowboy or whatever. The gate opens, the bull takes one leap and he goes flying off immediately. The problem is that it happened so quickly that the clowns couldn't get there distract the bull. The bull just pivots immediately and

slams him head to head. He was up against the wooden wall there and just smashed him, you know, head to head and back, and then the and then the clowns arrive and distracted me, turns away. The guy was setting up and he just fell over. And I don't know how seriously that guy was hurt. I mean, he didn't regain consciousness. Then they took him out. That was

the first event of that rodeo event. But whenever I see something like that, I always think that guy, I hate that that happened to him, But it certainly was funny to watch him warming up.

entire system would be very international. But when it comes to factory robots, China has multiple advantages large numbers of skilled electricians and specialized computer programmers who can install these robots, they said. So scientists are warning as we look at all this, the robotics, the AI labs and the rest

of this. We've got a couple of scientists making the rounds saying AI is so dangerous that company countries need to start making plans about how they're going to bomb these facilities when it goes bad, you know, like the Colossus that Elon Musk is building a Memphis that he named after this dystopian sci fi film where the computer tried to take over the world. So these guys have worked in this industry for quite some time, and they said,

we need to have a backup plan. We're going to destroy these data centers once this thing gets out of control. Because they feel like it's not an if but a when question.

can't fix it. With government force. It's like this thing, you know, the only tool that you've got is a hammer. Everything looks like a nail, so you go around beating up everything and breaking everything. And those are the people who think that the solution to the war on drug the solution to addiction and all the societal ills that we have is government force. It's not. And so I think we're on the same side here the way out of this. It's one of the things that I used

to say my friends. I had friends when I was an engineering that would use drugs or had use drugs, and one day they were talking about it, and I said, you know, I really don't like the war on drugs and I hate what is happening with it. And this was in let's see somewhere between nineteen eighty three and eighty six, I don't know which year, but it's when I was working at Data General, and I said, I have been in bands, I've been in you know, college,

all these different things. I said, I've never once had a person even offer drugs to me, even though I've been in places where people are taking drugs. I said, I don't think that we need the government to stop us from doing that and they started laughing. And that's what you're laughing about it. They said, they probably thought you were a nark. That's why they didn't offer any drugs because I was always you know, it's not about

these external things. The issues are internal. And if people have a hole in themselves so they can't fill because they've taken Christ out of it, then they're going to turn to some artificial things like that, and there's not anything the government's going to do to fix that. Think you all have a great weekend.