Fri Episode #2094: Tucker’s 9/11 Deception: Controlled Opposition to Bury the Truth

tens of thousands of times. That's what war is. You don't see every single one of the incidents, and you don't have a connection or history of kind of knowing that person, as people did with Charlie Kirk. But it is real, nevertheless, and governments think that they have the right to do that at any given time. So we're going to take a look at potential consequences of a

China war as well as Venezuela. We have some interesting revelations about the judge who released this fourteen time loser who murdered that young woman on the train as well. But we will also take a look at the amazing reactions of people to the Charlie Kirk. We'll be right back.

Apparently I'm qualified to be a judge. Actually, probably cracker barrel Sir Patron's day, old biscuits and microwaved meat loaf amid ill fated rebrand. Youm delicious, Branson. Flames is the block everything protest movement sweeps the country. Yes, well, France burns itself down about once a year.

members of Venezuelan gang. I just call him the Trendyes, it's trendy, ragua whatever. But they were at sea and international waters, transporting illegal narcotics headed to the United States, he said. Although the men could have been intercepted and arrested Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who told reporters that the President decided their summary execution was appropriate as a deterrent to drug trafficking, and so did hegseth and they

boasted that this isn't the last time that'll happen. They didn't see it as mistake, but as a new precedent of precedent Trump. The New York Times cited unnamed American officials familiar with the matter. So the boat appeared to have turned around before the attack. Started because the people on board had apparently spotted a military aircraft stalking it, and they will say, well, see it shows that they

were guilty. I don't know. It seems to me, especially considering the marks of President Trump, that people might look at the shoot first crazy Americans and try to avoid though I certainly would.

the way that things should be? The attack crossed a fundamental line in the Department of Defense that is resolutely committed to upholding for many decades, namely that accept, in rare and extreme circumstances that are not present here, the military must not use lethal force against civilians, even if they are alleged or even known to be violating the law. So Georgetown law professor Marty Letterman. Letterman adds that the September second drone strike appears to have violated the Executive

Order prohibiting assassination. Well wait a minute, Trump assassinated Solomony. He didn't have a problem with that and arguably qualifies as murder under federal law in the Uniform Code of Criminal Justice. I know that everybody wants to talk about Charlie Kirk, and we will follow up with the things that are happening with that. It's amazing to me, it's almost entirely the news that's been taking up with it.

And it is a tragedy, and it is not only a personal tragedy, but it's a tragedy that we have this culture, this cold war of hate now, especially between the two sides, but especially on the left. But we see this mirrored on both sides where people want to just destroy the other side or punish or lock up the other side because of political beliefs. And certainly there are dangerous people, and they're dangerous people once we've seen

on both sides of the political aisle. But to just do a blanket condemnation of people, understand that it is not speech that is hate, it is censorship that is hate, and eventually winds up that hate eventually winds up with murdering. You know, Jesus is right when he told us you've heard thou shalt not kill, But he says, if you have hate, in your heart and anger in your heart. That is essentially murder, because that's ultimately where it leads.

And we are seeing that in our society now. Though we decided that we didn't really care as a society what Jesus had to say, the truth of it is being demonstrated to us now. And the reality is is that when you look at a government that doesn't have to go through legal due process, that is the most dangerous thing that you can have. That is the largest terrorist and most dangerous terrorist gang that you can never have, is a government that has divorced itself from the rule

of law, thereby divorcing itself from due process. I mentioned when this happened, I compared it immediately to what do Tarte, the authoritarian dictator of the Philippines, did when he told the police, if you see somebody that you think is dealing drugs and Philippines, we're going to end this. Just shoot them on site. And they killed twelve thousand people.

And so when you look at this, this is compounded the whole issue that I've had for a very long time of how the United States, as you want to talk about nazis, what was it that people were concerned about with the nazis the fact that they started the war, right, they were the ones who invaded their neighbors and so forth. Everybody understands that's morally wrong. We don't anymore.

doing here is reprehensible. A New York University law professor Ryan Goodman, former Defense Department lawyer, says it's difficult to imagine how lawyers and signed the Pentagon could have arrived at a conclusion that this was legal, rather than the very definition of murder under international law rules that the Department Offense has long accepted. Well, yes, yeah, this is a question that Trump.

If somebody has broken into your house, if they are coming at you, you are allowed to defend yourself even to kill them, but not if you see them and suspect them of doing something in your yard you don't have to do, or if they're running from you, and that's the other issue. As this boat turned away, then that makes it even more complicated because now they are certainly no threat to the US military. They've turned away,

and they still shot them. As Trump told it, the attack was justified because the Trendees, a designated foreign terrorist organization operating under the control he said of Maduro, was responsible for mass murdered, drug trafficking, sex trafficking, and acts of violence and terror across the United States in the Western hemisphere. So his own government, as a matter of fact, disputes the fact that the gang is under the control

of Maduro. But I'll just say, even if somebody is known as a criminal, you can see them in the act of the crime. It has always been the requirement of government that you apprehend them. If we want to set up a death penalty for these cartel gangs, then that still means that they're not shot on site on the street because of what that could entail. That means they still get arrested, whether it's by the police or by the military and you seize the property that's there.

As I said, the very same time this is happening, you had the Coastguard stopping ships and they are addicting a great deal of drugs that are coming into the United States. But they don't execute everybody on board. Even if they stop the ship and prove that it has drugs on it, they're not allowed to execute everybody. You're still bringing back for due process. And if the government wants to make a capital offense selling drugs or delivering drugs,

that's a different issue that needs to be debated. That is where we are now, though, because we never debated making drugs illegal in the first place. When they made alcohol illegal a prohibition, we had the eighteenth Amendment to the Constitution. There's not even any constitutional authority for the drug war, let alone to kill people without any due process or even proving that they are involved with the drug trade. Drug cartels have wrought devastating consequences on American

communities for decades, he said. No, I would say that the drug cartels were created by the drug war, and the drug war created by the UN. We're now out there murdering people without any proof to enforce a UN agenda. Trump said in a September fourth letter to Congress, we have now reached a critical point where we must meet this threat to our citizens and our most vital national interests with the US military force in self defense. So he's claiming that we can go on offense and self defense.

That's essentially what the Japanese were saying with Pearl Harbor. You know, we got to kill them before they kill us. Last week, Trump joked about potential for deadly heirs. He said, I think anybody that saw that is going to say, I'll take a pass. I don't even know about fishermen. They may say, I'm not going to get on the boat. I'm not going to take a chance. This is the This is the ranting of somebody who is nothing other

than a thug. He's proud of what he did. He's proud of the fact that fishermen are going to be afraid to get into their boats. They're afraid of me, right, this is what disgusted me so much.

but they die in agony, in pain. That's usually the case. Are we going to inflict that for what purpose? So that Trump can boast about what a strong man he is. It's disgusting. He's no different than the people that they have claimed with their enemies. Member. When George H. W. Bush called Manuel Noriegay a strong man, nor Ye Gay, you know, well, we've got a strong man in the White House, now, don't we. That's what these strong men do. Killing cartel members who poison our fellow citizens is the

highest and the best use of our military, said JD. Vance. I got to say I would never support this guy ever, based on that statement alone. There's many other reasons not to support him, concerning his connections with the technocracy, his connections with MR and a self amplifying technology, and the rest of this stuff, but that in and of itself shows that he is not qualified to be president ever. Ever,

and Ran Paul called him out on it. A commentator observed, the killing citizens of another nation who are civilians without any due process is called a war crime, and he says, I don't give a blank what you call it. Remember when conservatives, do you remember when Al Gore made the statement, there's no controlling legal authority here. Everybody had a big

issue with that. Everybody had a big issue when Obama assassinated using a drone, assassinated someone who was an American citizen technically, even if not in reality, in a foreign country, said oh, you can just select anybody, even an American citizen, and kill them without any due process. Because of the principle involved. It wasn't that the guy was a good guy.

He might have very well have been a terrorist. But even at that time, conservatives were concerned because when it was not somebody that was a part of their party, when it's a Democrat like al Gore or Obama, their thought process is not clouded by partisan loyalty. They can look at the principles involved, and the principles are the same here. So Rampaul responded to JdE events. As I pointed out last week, what a despicable, thoughtless sentiment it

is to glorify killing someone without a trial. And that's what we're seeing from both Trump and jd Events. It is sickening and thoughtless. Trump's justification for that shortcut is perverse, says Reason. Although he describes the act as an act of self defense, he does not claim that the alleged drug traffickers were engaged in a literal attack on the

United States. To accept Trump's framing, you have to accept the premise that transporting illegal drugs is tannamount to violent aggression, and of course, to the left, speech is tannamount to violent aggression as well. You know, people always try to make that leap to justify what they really want to do. That would be consistent with Trump's often expressed desire to kill drug dealers, but it is not consistent with the

way that laws or ordinarily enforced. And when I see that I always want to put laws, drug laws and quotes air quotes, because they can't be laws if they violate the Constitution, and clearly they do. We have two constitutional amendments that made it clear. The eighteenth Amendment created alcohol prohbiation that twenty first ended it. We have two amendments to the Constitution that show that according to the clear reading of the Constitution ninth and tenth Amendment, they

cannot assume the power to ban anything. They need a constitutional amendment to ban anything like that. So, in the absence of violent resistance, a police officer who decided to shoot a drug suspect dead rather than take them into custody would be guilty of murder. Morally speaking, the situation is no different. That much is clear, even without considering the fundamental injustice of criminalizing conduct that does violence to no one's rights, such as exchange of drugs for money.

And again this is a reason so they they do not support the drug war at all. Again making a distinction, as Lyceendus Spooner did, between crime and vice, that vice is something that somebody is involved in that they do voluntarily. That's what makes it so difficult to shut down vice, and by that we mean things like prostitution, drug dealing, all these other things which are really fundamentally moral issues. We have two people that are willing to engage in

this process. Even if it is something that is credibly harmful, even suicidal, you're not going to stop it by enacting laws. So the trendy designation as a terrorist organization does not affect this analysis. Trump administration officials admit that they could have interdicted the boat and detained the people on board, notes George Mason, law professor Ilia Summan. They did not pose any imminent threat of violence. They were not combatants

in any war against the US. Calling them narco terrorists does not change these obvious facts as reasons. Matthew Petty observes, the unprovoked attack on a boat allegedly carrying drugs shows how the label of terrorism makes everyone killable, and that's really what we're talking about the aftermath of nine to eleven, the idea that you're either with us or you're a terrorist.

It was a war on terrorism. It was a war on a tactic not necessarily identifying the people who did this, and of course they tried to pretend that it was Afghanistan and men in caves who did this a ludicrous idea. The rhetorical license to kill does not amount to legal justification. The State Department designation merely triggers the government's ability to implement asset controls and other economic sanctions under the International

Emergency Economic Powers Act. So what they're saying is you label somebody a terrorists, then what that does is that triggers asset control and economic sanctions and things like that. Just like when Trump made the emergency decoration about the so called pandemic, it was to release money. So much of this stuff always has to do with money, doesn't it.

It has nothing to do with authorizing Defense Department to engage in targeted killings, which is why the US military doesn't go round killing members of all designated foreign terrorist organizations. Nor can Trump cite any other statute that transforms murder

into self defense in this context. Instead, he is relying on his quote constitutional authority as commander in chief and chief executive to use deadly force against civilians he perceives as a threat to national security and foreign policy interests, and again engaging in assassination of foreign leaders and all the rest of this stuff he needs to be impeached. They will never impeach him for the stuff that he

should be impeached for. And the impeachment for nonsense charges, not violations of the constitution, those types of things that were done. Essentially, we are something that's giving him a pass when it comes to this stuff. People are so used to seeing bogus charges brought against Trump that they just roll their eyes when impeachment is mentioned. But if ever there was a president in my lifetime that deserves

to be impeached, it's Donald Trump. Since Trump frequently describes a legal immigration as an invasion, might he decide that he has the authority to order the summary execution of

people trying to enter the country without permission. Scott Anderson, Senior fellow of the National Security Law Program at Columbia Law School, says many of the legal arguments that Trump administration has advanced in relation to narcotics trafficking might also extend to other for far more troubling uses of force that certain administration officials have reportedly raised, For example, the use of lethal force against unlawful migrants whose transport is

facilitated by the trendy Kang White House spokesperson Anna Kelly claims Trump quote acted in line with the laws of armed conflict to protect our country from evil narco terrorists trying to poison our homeland. Nothing can be further from the truth. We have a group of sycophants in the Trump administration that will openly bowlface lie to the American public to support their lying leader. It's amazing to me, and that includes people like Carol Lying Lovett and Squeaker

Mouse Johnson. But even if you accept the specious equation of drug smuggling and armed agression, it seems relevant that the alleged drug boat reportedly was running back when the drone strike was launched. If someone is treating it retreating, where is the imminent threat? Says Rear Admiral Donald Guter, formerly the top judge advocate for the Navy, when he was asked in an interview with New York Times, where

is the quote self defense? They're gone. That's gone if that ever existed, and I don't think that it ever did. Rear Admiral James McPherson, who served in the same position as Gouter, was also General Counsel to the Army during the first Trump administration, and he was similarly skeptical. I would be interested if they could come up with a

legal basis for what they did. If, in fact, you can fashion a legal argument that says these people were getting ready to attack the US through the introduction of cocaine or whatever. If they turned back, then that that threat has gone away. He said, it's a terrible precedent, said the Jeffrey corn formerly the Army Chief Advisor on the.

Would that come to American soil? This is a question asked by the Daily Signal, which is actually part of the Heritage Foundation, a conservative organization, And so they're kind of wargaming, you know, what would happen, And they don't even get a tiny fraction of it. As we always say, you know, when you're talking about a war, whether it's a civil war or foreign war, everybody has a cavalier attitude. This is going to be a piece of case for

our side. If they didn't have that attitude, if they thought they were going to lose, they wouldn't get into the war, right If they cared about the cost to their own military or to civilians, they wouldn't enter the war. So it's based on hubrists, arrogance, pride, and disregard for human life. That's what we always see with these wars. And so in this article they say that think about all the different things that China could do. They could

start wildfires all over the place. For example, they could attack our infrastructure, which is incredibly vulnerable. As a matter of fact, we'll be talking to Jack Lawson today in the third hour about things like that, and about some op ed pieces that he put out about about the shootings that were happening, not about Charlie Kirk, but about

the school shootings that were happening. And of course there was another school shooting happening that happened the day that Charlie Kirk was killed, but it was completely swamped with the coverage of Charlie Kirks, so nobody even talked about that. But look at how the you know, anybody who wanted to attack the US today with asymmetric warfare. We have such a vulnerable supply chain. And that was the first

time I talked to Jack Lawson. It was about the vulnerability of the supply chain and why that showed a need to prepare for your food and other things like that. That's what his book is about, and we saw that in spades in twenty twenty. We have a long, complicated, just in time supply chain that is easily disrupted, especially if somebody wanted to do it on purpose. Just look

at what these people did, arguably with stupidity. Although I believe that there was malice involved in twenty twenty with the pandemic lockdowns, I don't think it was simply stupidity. I think it was malice. But imagine if it was a foreign power like China and with our poorest they could easily do all of this stuff. They've already got

enough people in here to do that. So when you look at how vital Taiwan is to the electronics industry, for example, whether or not Taiwan followed a scorch druss policy and destroyed the factories to keep them from falling into Chinese hands, or whether or not they did fall

into Chinese hands. Either way, we'd be cut off from the major supplies of top of the line stay the art semicductor development that is being done manufactured in Taiwan now and have a devastating long term effect on both consumer goods as well as military goods in the United States. But they could attack our supply chain in any number of ways. And so that's really kind of what they're

wargaming here. And that's over and above things like hypersonic missiles, which they don't even get into in this article, the primary tools of war, or when you look at things like again, they're not paying attention to the change into autonomous killing machines like drones and things like that. So there's a lot of weapons that have been developed that we've not seen deployed in more conventional warfare. But it's the asymmetric attacks on America that could easily be the

turning point with all this stuff. She reportedly told Trump that he won't invade Taiwan, while Trump is present, but it's also said to have told his military to be ready to seize Taiwan by twenty twenty seven. So he's still going to do it in Trump's administration unless he thinks that Trump will die by twenty twenty seven. Cyber attacks and attacks on the infrastructure, even disease, they say in this. But again that is going back to the fake narrative of the China flu, which I don't agree

with that at all. That's one of the things that the leftist pressed when they said controversial things that Charlie Kirk said, and they go back to the pandemic, and I thought, yeah, that's interesting. What do you say about the pandemic. Well, he called it a the China flu. B he said he could come in through the poorest borders and all the rest of stuff. All of that is what there were gaming here. But that is not what I think happened at all. It was self inflicted

with a bioweapon of the Trump shot. Michael Cunningham, who until recently served as a research fellow the Heritage Foundation, disagrees and says that China would likely would not likely use the virus as a weapon of attack since the Chinese could get harmed by it as well. But again it is I don't think that any of that pandemic stuff is real at this point in time. No one is talking about new military attack in it. But they said, once a war breaks out that involves the US and China,

then all of the worst case scenarios are on the table. Yeah, these people will recklessly RUSSI ahead, just as we see them doing in Central and South America.

Taiwan than Israel has to Palestine. I don't support China taking Taiwan, but it has a better claim than Israel does to Palestine. When you look at it from this angle.

these things. World war scenarios in which the US and trying to battle it out, or in which China manages to largely stay out of the war and gets to pick up the pieces and establish a new world order can't be ruled out. And of course a new world order is what the globals want, and they've always pushed to make sure that China is going to be the leader of that new world order. Well, let's move on from that to the war that's being conducted against us.

In terms of ignoring the results of criminals when they are arrested, I mean, you know, this is I think one of the things that feeds into people's frustration, saying, you know, we need to just execute these people. Well, because we have a justice system so called that doesn't punish the guilty, but in many cases punishes people who've done nothing seriously wrong, if anything at all wrong. At all, the judge who freed the Charlotte killer didn't even go

to law school or pass the bar. And by the way, this is kind of interesting if you look at it. This is a magistrate judge in North Carolina and they are not required by law to be licensed lawyers. They aren't elected either. The way the process works, I'll look this up. They are nominated by the county clerk of the court, who is elected, but then that person nominates people, and then they are appointed by the senior superior court judge for that district, and then they are supervised by

the chief district court judge. So the bottom line, all these people are saying that this magistrate judge needs to be taken out. That doesn't get to the root of the problem. You should get rid of the clerk of the court, the senior superior court judge who appointed the person, and the person who supervised them, the chief district court judge.

him free. This individual was apparently picked because of Democrat dei politics or qualification seems to be that she's a lesbian.

Ross Olbrik Remember, and he pardoned Ross Elbrick. But now the Trump administration and this same guy, the same corrupt individual, the deputy Attorney General or whatever, who's forget what his name was, who interviewed Glaine Maxwell and then released the notes and stuff, Blanche or something like that. He's got

a woman's name, but he's not a transgender. That's his last name or anyway, the same guy has continued with prosecutions that were begun under the Biden administration, and they've arrested people who were software developers creating personal custody digital wallets that were outside of their system. Todd Blanch, Yeah, that's it. I knew it was he's a blanche is doing this anyway? Uh he uh. They they're there. These guys are looking at decades in prison because they developed

a piece of software. And as Mesas said, this is like locking up Afford CEO because somebody committed a crime with one of their vehicles. And uh, that's not just an is said case. There's two of these that they

talk about in the Mesas things. So you've got somebody just like like what you were talking about, Travis, is like, if the government perceives what you're doing as a threat to their power that they want to exercise, they're gonna put you in jail for decades, just like they did with Ross All Break.

beyond our comprehension. We continually say it, but it is hard for us to imagine, you know, the level of evil that these people commit to, just because.

conflict after the other. So last time this guy was arrested, he called nine to one one and claimed that he had been given quote a man made material unquote the controlled when he ate, what he said and where he walked. Please shupport that Brown became agitated when the officers did not believe him, leading to charges of misusing the nine to one one system. So that's it's not that this guy is absolutely bonkers. They you know, you called nine one one illegitimately.

He had been previously arrested for assaulting his sister in charge of possession of a firearm by a fellon, but none of these things were there to put him in jail, in addition to a five year prison sentence for robbery with a dangerous weapon. Again, when you look at robbery with a dangerous weapon, that's not as serious as creating an app for a digital wallet. That's the thing that

they really are concerned about. So on Monday, North Carolina Republican lawmakers issued a formal letter calling for her removal. But again, they're not talking about removing these other judges who these other individuals who nominated her, appointed her, supervised her.

They're going to stay. This decision was made despite brown extensive criminal history, which included at least fourteen prior arrests for serious offenses such as possession of a firearm by a felon, robbery with a dangerous weapon, and physical assault of his sister. Despite his history a violent and unstable behavior, Magistrate Stokes released Brown without requiring bond or imposing any

meaningful conditions to safeguard the public. So the controversy surrounding this judge is expected to continue a state lawmaker's way accountability measures in the wake of the killing. Then to go back and get Pulty or some of Musk's people to take some AI and go back and look at her entire career. There as a magistrate with a fine tooth comb and the people who pointed, nominated and supervised her as well. Well, we're going to take a quick break, but before we do, you want to take a look.

And with the ability, as far as I'm aware, to edit the HTML on basically any web page and make it say just about anything you want on your end and take a screenshot of it, I am always wary of these things unless you can confirm it for yourself. I don't trust screenshots. There's an entire industry that's built around generating clickbait, and they're not above, you know, faking

this kind of thing. They're not above putting up some AI book on Amazon or having placeholders there that they can quickly edit and swap for different things, and then editing the HTML to make it look different. Again, it's possible. Anything is possible. These people are evil, and there's again I don't blame anyone for not believing, you know, the official story.

I saw the cover of the book. It looks like it was AI generated and as far as you know, it looks like it's AI. So it looks like someone very quickly through this together to generate outrage and clicks on articles for the you know, gossip mill that has grown up over the years online.

Oh they got him now. Third one who had time to jump off the roof with no weapon, but found the rifle nearby woods in a box wrapped in a towel. I saw the video of the guy jumping off the roof.

artifacts that sometimes look like that. But I highly tout Trump would have put out an AI video talking about the Charlie Kirk shooting after it happens. There's absolutely no reason anyone would do that.

Andy Wodie. At least that's my opinion. I don't fault anyone for disagreeing on anything, Yanna any Wody good to see Yona Satan Yaho pronounced him dead fourteen minutes after he was shot in ten minutes before the hospital did amazing Jesse Lee Peter's amazing timed non tides forcing masks on Americans broke the social contract. My neighbors. Voting to do that to my family is unacceptable. They are Yes, they are violating the NAP. They are using violence.

apec Phonsie Bear morning? The New York Times in LA Times reported Kirk being shot the day before. On the ninth, Amazon Books released online the shooting of Charlie Kirk one day before complete style. Again, I've seen people talking about The New York Times and LA Times reporting on it. I cannot find a real source of it. I can't find pictures of an article. I can't find it. I've seen clips from Alex to Alex Jones talking about it, but I haven't been able to verify it for myself.

what he has to say. And so I don't like calling people out by name, but that is the reality if you've got somebody out there. These people see themselves as influencers, and it is an influencer war, that's what it really is, not information war. And so these people are there to nudge you. And that's why the government protects them, does not charge them with the crime. The government's charging everybody with crimes. It's just look at Januine the did he get charge of anything? No, not at all.

That should be very suspicious. Talk about that instead of his conspiracies about the New York Times and the LA Times. It's the fact that he didn't get indicted. Is the dog that did not bark? That's the reality of all this stuff.

They don't, you know, arrest and let go three people.

We'll take a quick break and we'll be right back.

That's on zell and real quickly on cash app, which you can find links to these on Davidknight dot news. We have Jonathan L. Richard A. Patrick V. Christopher Michael B. Thank you so much all of you for the support. And we're going to go to September eleventh, now before we get to Charlie Kirk, because I want to talk a little bit about that and people's reactions and comments on it at this point in time. Why nine to eleven Truth still matters a quarter of a century on.

This is from the Free Thought Project. They said, the nine to eleven Truth movement still pushes on confronting the lies of the official narrative, despite waning public interest, and it's just as important today as it was twenty four years go. It is seminal. I mean, you talk about crossing the rubicon. So much stuff changed in reaction to nine to eleven. Even if the story had been true, you could not justify the types of things that they

have done in America because they're unconstitutional. All I know about all this stuff is that the official story could not be true any more than the story about the magic bullet and the jfk assassination could be true. So it is based on absurdity, and that is the reality, you know, when we go back and look at as amazing as I said yesterday, Tucker Carlson is going to do a documentary about nine to eleven, the guy who was part of the cover up. As far as I'm concerned.

This is a Building seven, which he said he couldn't talk about or he'd get fired twenty years ago, But now he's going to do a documentary on it. We'll start with this.

of those was done two months before nine eleven. Then you had the false flag anthrax attack. Then two months later they put out the model legislation to get around the tenth Amendment, and all that was required was for a president to release the money and the incentives to get people to do it at the state level. And that's what MAGA refused to understand about Trump. In two thousand and one, you were a trader and a terrorist sympathizer for daring to question the official orthodoxy of nine

to one one. In twenty ten, you were a wing nut conspiracy theorist. In twenty twenty five, the Overton window has moved, and while questioning the official story of nine to eleven can still get you some strange looks in some circles, only the most naive sufferers of statist Stockholm

syndrome still by the entirety of the official story. Three years ago, the Free Thought Project published a crash course in nine eleven Truth seven documentaries you need to see to serve as a comprehensive introduction or refresher course for readers to become familiar. See. That's the other thing too. It's important to see that. And as he pointed out, it didn't fall to the side or anything like that.

That's why when I've told the story, we didn't have television, and we didn't have internet that was strong enough that we could watch videos in two thousand and one, so I'm getting phone reports from relatives.

happen here, so they said yes. As yet, as decades tick on and the goalposts move, as the public has bombarded with a day loser propaganda, social engineering, and manufactured outrage, all types of fifth generational warfare, it seems as though this ever so pivot whole point in world history has somewhat fallen to the wayside. And I've done several interviews with architects and engineers both on nine to eleven as well as on the anthrax attack, and they have continued

to follow up on that as well. For once nine eleven truth was to be all and end all of truth liberty movement, drawing thousands to attend truth rallies in New York City and Washington, led by the families of the victims. Often most of the public has since tuned it out. They recycled it for another tragedy of the moment, And of course yesterday it was Charlie Kirk that dominated the headlines and instead of the as they point out,

the state sponsored murder of thousands twenty years ago. To achieve their objectives, and that is to completely do an in run around the Constitution so they could have endless wars and the justification to establish the foundations of the police surveillance state. That all was the outcome of that. And of course the other shoe to drop was a pandemic twenty years later.

September tenth, and today is a last day. And if you look at the people who are speaking there, I have some issues with some of the people there. Now. I've interviewed John Kyriaku and Richard Gage, and I think for the most part, I would go along with what they have to say. Dennis Cascinich and a lot of people are going to be concerned with how this was used, regardless of how it was, who did it, and how

they executed this. But you've also got people like Tucker Carlson going to be speaking there, and it's like, I'm sorry, but you know, as I played yesterday, I'll play it again here. That's Tucker when you're young.

my head and say, this is what has happened. They always co opt these movements with their own people in later years. It was exact blueprint that paved the way for the draconian abuses of the COVID nineteen eighty four regime. So it's free thought project. Well, no, they were always tied together from the very beginning with Dark Winter and Anthrax attack and that type of thing. Nine loven. Truth isn't just about seeking justice for victims and families that

were who lost members. It's about seeking to dismantle the system that profits from these wars of expansion. Domestic institutions of exploitation and oppression. It's about reclaiming one's personal liberty from the clutches of the state and fighting for a better future for all of us. So in light of that, I got to say, be careful of these nudge news influencers.

It really concerns me that Tucker Caralson is going to now take over the nine to eleven movement, and anything this guy does, everybody flocks to him and it becomes the new baseline of people's understanding. So he's going to completely rewrite all these investigations that have been done for the longest amount of time. That's what's going to be

happening in the future with nine to eleven. And I thought, this is from Wall Street Journal and it is not about nine to eleven at all, But the headline was the rise of conspiracy physics, and it made me think of Building seven and the fact that Tucker Caralson never wanted to talk about it, and he wouldn't just say

I'd get fired if I did something like that. He would actually oppose these people, and he'd say, all they want to do is talk to me about you know, what is the melting point of steel and what is the temperature of burning airplane fuel and things like that. He didn't want to look at that. He didn't want to look at the physics of a building that falls into its own footprints.

tremendous success, not a failure. They are opposed to anything that we would ever want to have, but that it's exactly they're doing exactly what they were designed to do. And I got to say that. You know, their position is, of course that the official story is true, but the government reaction is wrong. And that's where I was until I saw the pictures of what happened there. It's like, no, no, no, we don't want to have the Patriot Act. That is

a horrible response. Even if every word that they said were true, that was the wrong response. But that's it was not a failure. It was a failure to understand and still is a failure to understand on a part of many. Instead, while the Bush administration claimed the attacks occurred because of structural problems with the government's intelligent apparatus, FBI agents were warned about the suspicious activity by flight

students who were among the nine to eleven hijackers. Again, this is a part of the mythology but also part of the preparation as well, And they should have been concerned when somebody developed indestructible identification.

to do was the wrong thing. That feeling that we were really all one people, And I got to say that this is from the epic times, remembering nine to eleven. You know, when we were all on the same page

and we were all pulling together. That is why they take us to war, because when you have war, it unites the people behind the government against the outside nebulous enemy, when in reality, in most cases, it is the government that is causing the war, the government that is taking you to war simply because, as Jerald Celenti has said so many times times, when all else fails and you're about to come after the government, they take you to war so that you're rally behind them. This is what

we're seeing in Yahoo doing. It's a big part of what he did in Israel. Scientists sound the alarm and exposed the deadly COVID vaccine side effects that have been scrubbed from federal data. And again, is this another government mistake or is this a deliberate conspiracy. I am not a coincidence theorist. I don't believe these things are coincidences. A world renowned scientist has just mown the lid off a safe and effective narrative for the COVID vaccines the

Trump Shots. After uncovering shocking data scrubbed from the federal government safety database. They hid thousands of safety signals from the public. But I got to say, how did we know? We knew at this time because we knew that this stuff A had not been tested. They bragged about the fact they're going to rush it to market. We knew that it was a genetic code injection that had never been tested. And then we saw very early on. I remember when it's like, look at this, We've got enough

reports in the Various database. It's the same as they would get for an entire year, and it's only been a couple of days or weeks or something like that. And then before you know it, it kept escalating, and then it was equivalent to several years of the database. And then it was more than all of the adverse effects have been recorded in the Various database since they had begun it. How could you not know that this

was harmful? So yes, at the same time, they were hiding these safety signals and instead of more deserving the FDA system missed an estimated ninety six percent of pfizers and ninety one percent of moderna's safety signals. That amounts to as many as six thousand, seven hundred and sixty five safety signals effectively lost so why is it still there? Why is it that the Trump administration that RFK Junior and all these MAGA Maha health officials have not shut

this thing down. As we said before, if you have a baby's crib that causes a couple of injuries or death, they shut that thing down. Sixty seven one hundred safety signals and that's still out there. Wisman argues, this wasn't a minor oversight.

was a good faith effort. It was never a good faith effort, and it was not. They didn't do their best to save us from a lab leak, deadly virus.

Don't buy into that. These are these same influencers who are trying to tell you that the that the pandemic was real, that it was dangerous, that the PCR procedures were real, and all the rest of this stuff, everything about it was fake, phony and these new narratives that they're pushing so hard, and I say new there were some people pushing that from the very beginning, interestingly, but

they has now become the establishment push that. Yeah, you know, Fauci rigged this stuff, and he was the one who was responsible. He in the Chinese and so this is about projecting this onto them so that you don't come after the real criminals. Comments.

the guy. Of course, everybody insists that they are innocent, but this guy he found to be very convincing and he started interviewing people, and Errol Morris when he would interview people the documentary, he used to be an investigator to detect to himself, and he had something he called an terotron, which was an interesting technique. What he would do.

Instead of talking to people face to face, he would separate himself from them a little bit by using a teleprompter and so the people would be looking at him and talking to him in the teleprompter and by having that distance that was there. Of course, he was also a very good interrogator as well, but he believed that that helped to get them to open up and to disarm them, because it was almost like they were talking

to something that wasn't there, wasn't real. I guess maybe there was an aspect of that it's involved in the AI psychosis stuff that's out there, but it kind of got proven when he interviewed Robert McNamara for his film The Fog of War, and over a couple of days, basically McNamara admitted it was Vietnam's started over a false flag, and that he was a war criminal and many other things. That was truly amazing what he got him to admit to. And so as part of this, Errol Morris got the

real killer to admit that he had done it. And the reason I say they will always find the man is because it involved a police officer who was shot and killed. They do not want you to see that the killer of a police officer goes free and isn't caught. So they're going to catch somebody, whether it's the right person or not. And that is clear the case with Charlie Kirk. They will catch somebody, whether it's the right person or not.

they're doing in Gaza, they're capable of anything. Frankly, Yeah, and I don't know they did it. That doesn't mean they did it, but I do know they're capable of it.

I agree, that's kind of my opinion on it. I think these were probably generated for clicks.

New York and La Times Bille Houghton. When Trump's FBI moves Gilain Maxwell to a country club prison, that speaks volumes yeah, and that does We're all dead. There are about five thousand red flags in the shooting. Everyone needs to calm down. One thing I think it's important to remember is that it takes a crazy person to do something like this. Every assassination is going to have weird things around it, because to do this sort of thing, you've got to be a weird individual, to say the least.

So just always remember that well balanced, normal people who do well balanced normal things don't commit murder and assassination. So there's always going to be very strange happenings around it because it's done by very strange, very disturbing.

We are all read that one. Jerry Alatalo are in a stage of j Casey's book is self published.

There's again thousands upon thousands on thousands of them, and there's more every day. It's really really easy apparently to get a book on Amazon.

But the you know now they have typically if they've got like some kind of an mk ultra shoot or something like that, they'll make sure that they killed themselves so that it doesn't.

see it very clearly. You can see he injured himself. He's limping. I need to see a more upclose version. Note I haven't been able to actually watch it on a large monitor. It's a bit far away. But I'll have to look at that. If you say you can see the gun there, I'm not going to dispute it. I need to take a closer look. Frodo lives outlaw, order, outlaw, out door political events.

or f A Hyak? And he starts going down this whole list, most of them free market or Austrian economists. He had never heard of them. Finally he got to but he mentioned some other economists. He only got to John Maynard Kaynes. And of course this guy had heard about him because they hammered Keynesy and economics in the schools anything. But the guy was just such an idiot, and Charlie was proud of the fact. He goes, yeah,

that's right, I don't have a college degree. As a matter of fact, he says, I dropped out of college, out of a junior college even, you know. So he emphasized the fact that he was self taught, but he he called himself an autodidact. He said, do you know what that means? And the guy didn't know what it means. He goes, she should look it up, you know. He said, he's self taught, but he just he was good in

terms of engaging the students. It was and when you look at this the other part of it is is like this guy was the best argument for not going to college that you could have that was there, you know, studying economics, but he doesn't know a thing about it. He doesn't even know the major economists of the twenty first of the twentieth century.

poor dad. That's good, that's funny. Yeah, we're all dead. Venezuela and Brazil will be traded for Ukraine and Taiwan, according to Romberg, all right, I'll trade you my Venezuela for your Ukraine. KWD sixty eight. What was in buildings seven that it needed to be destroyed?

one time. We went down there just on a drive and we're just kind of walking around in shops and it was not tourist season or anything, and it was very empty in this one shot, and this lady wanted to talk to me while Karen was looking around at the knickknacks, and she started telling me that she was retired military and blah blah blah, and her husband was as well, and that's why they were running the shop.

And she just starts monologuing and telling me her whole history. Said, you know, I was with a group that was investigated. I had been working in that same office that was hit with a plane on nine to eleven. And she said, we had found so many high ranking military and political officials, congressmen who decided they weren't going to run for reelection. They were contacted and they were given a way to just go away and not be prosecuted. And she said,

we were finding so much stuff. It's so sad that that happened. And she goes and I almost died. I got out of there just a couple of weeks before that happened, and I wanted to record it, but I wanted to hear what she had to say. And I knew if I started recording her, she was going to clam up. But they really drove it home with me that that's what was really going on. So I don't know what was there in Building seven, but I'm sure they had their reasons for doing it.

said that Charlie Kirk spoke his fate into existence. This is Laura sash Lightsey, assistant dean of students at Middle Tennessee State University, and posted that on Facebook and said she had zero sympathy. Now she has zero career, which is fine with me. I mean, we don't need these kind of deranged, hateful people running the universities. That's why the universities are the way that they are. She then

subsequently deleted her entire Facebook account, was too late. People had grabbed it, and Senator Marshall Blackburn, who represents Tennessee, called for her to be fired. So she needs to be fired tomorrow, and she was. School officials fired her from their position there. And then we have Governor Pritzker who blames Trump after Kirk assassinates said it's the President's

rhetoric that often femits violence. Now I find it interesting, and that's one of the reasons why I opened the show with this unprovoked attack on a Venezuelan boat that Trump and everybody in his administration bragged about. Do you find it interesting that Pritzker would not attack Trump on that, but would attack him on his rhetoric, saying that his rhetoric had led people to react to try hardly correct that way, as if speech justified that kind of violence.

That's the mindset of the left. They're not going to push back against an egregious war crime and violation of the Constitution. What they'll do is they'll use this to push back against free speech.

kill Nazis. That's what they say. They say, you're a Nazi and that Nazis should be killed, and therefore they are co signing the death of anyone they slap that label onto. Yeah, they have pushed this rhetoric, you're.

right now. But you know what we're seeing here, as you point out, it's this idea that if they don't like what you say, they label you as a Nazi, and if the right doesn't like what you say, they label you as a terrorist. Evidently, so it's the censorship is the issue. The censorship is hate, which leads to violence on people. They want to say, however, that speech is hate and speech is violence, I say, is the opposite.

I say that the instinct to censor people it comes from a position of hate, which can then lead to violence, and it can be state violence against people as well. I think they got it exactly backwards. But I think it's interesting that Pritzker would talk about this because again, it's all about politics. It's not about principles of the

rule of law anywhere. And as they point out in Breitbart, meanwhile, there have been eleven hundred and fifty two people shot in Chicago so far this year, two hundred and eight of them died. That's on top of the twy four hundred and forty four shot and the six hundred and ten murdered just last year, along with similar records each

year of the last ten years. Charlie Kirk himself even warned of the assassination culture that has sprung up on the left, leading to many regular, average everyday Democrats to say that political violence, in murdering your political opponent, is a legitimate tactic. And I think it is inevitable that that kind of mindset is going to come out of a mindset that wants to censor any speech that it hates. That's what leads to the violence that is there, he said.

In April, he said assassination culture is spreading on the left. Forty eight percent of liberals say that it would be at least somewhat justified to murder Elon. Fifty five percent said the same thing about Donald Trump. And of course, all it takes is one to kill you, which is what happened with Charlie Kirk. Barack Obama condemns the despicable violence after Charlie Kirk was assassinated. That's the headline from Breitbart. But the interesting thing is he says, this kind of

despicable violence has no place in our democracy. But he pretends that he doesn't really know why this happened. He said, we don't yet know what motivated the person who shot and killed Charlie Kirk. Oh, we don't. This is kind of like what you see when you got somebody with a knife stabbing a dozen people, yelling alhu aakbar, and we say we don't know what motivated him cut all that is kind of ridiculous. Lefties run to social media mocking Charlie Kirk for opposing gun control and putting up

things like if only we had gun control. He fought hard for guns and prayers and so forth. We wanted gun control to save him, to save his life too. Some of them said, no, you.

like Kirk, round up people like us and you and chat. Yeah, the Second Amendment is the only thing stopping these people from acting out on their completely hateful, violent urges, and their reactions prove it.

and now he is dead. Well, the reality is is that he'd been very critical of Zelensky, and justifiably so. He called him an international welfare queen, and he's exactly right, an ungrateful, petulant child responsible for a million dead, citing Zelensky's refusal to consider peace deal with Russia and his

continuation of a conflict financed by Western money. And so these Ukrainians are saying, well, he left around and he found out and wishing him to rest in pieces, but he wants questioned whether or not the Ukrainians would try to kill him because they had a hit list of people who had opposed continuing funding of the Ukrainian War by the US government, and one person in particular who was not only pushing for the Ukrainian War but also was a transgender, the ex head of the Ukrainian Territorial

Defense's English language propaganda vowed to hunt down those he called Krimlin propagandists. They say she, but it was a guy pretending that he was a woman, adding that a strike against an individual favored by Putin was imminent. And so Kirk asked in response to that, he said, so are they going to try to murder Steve Bannon or Tucker Carlson or me? And that was not that long ago. He said, None of us are Putin puppets or Russian propagandists.

But the New York Times calls us that, Twitter calls us that, and that person, who by the way, was a transgender is who is funded by the US Treasury, says we are going to come murder you. And so they were getting American government to create a money to create a hit list of their political enemies. And then on Blue Sky, there are a lot of stuff.

met a YouTube. Reddit discored all issued statements like that. X did not, and so you were able to see quite a bit of that on X. Yeah, and the view actually was civil in this. That was of the biggest surprises to make was that the people in the view, who are usually so toxic and deranged and uninformed, were actually compassionate about this.

hate speech or sort of aimed at certain groups. Hateful thoughts lead the hateful words, which lead to hateful actions. Said you can't stop this with all sorts of awful thoughts that you have, and so forth, and so For that, he was fired. But he was also the one who came out idiotically said, well, we don't know at this point what happened. Could have been some of his supporters firing off guns and celebration. We talked about that. It's like, since when have you ever seen anything?

she said, and so I still avista to him. But Cindral, Elizabeth Warren and Jen Saki, the former Biden spokesman, suggested that it was due to Charlie Kirk not turning down his rhetoric, which, as we point out, we thought was somewhat moderate.

of prayer. Well, you had Mike Johnson held a moment of silence for Charlie Kirk, and then when that moment was over, you had Lauren Bobert requested a moment of prayer out loud, not of silence, and when she said that, she said, silent prayer gets silent results. I think that, you know, if you are ashamed to mention the name of Christ, don't expect that your prayers are going to be heard. She said, Is there someone who could lead us in a moment of prayer out loud for Charlie

and his family? And then the Democrats had a fit and they started shouting on the floor, groaning about that, and you know, saying shut up. I mean, that's that's the state of the of the Democrat Party. They have made themselves the Antichrist party.

who have changed, not the guns. And so he was wrong in saying that it's worth it to have a the cost of unfortunately some gun desks every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God given rights.

changed in our culture. And of course that is the schools that is purging God out of our schools as they want him purged out of the house of the house floor. And so that's what's changed, along with the fact that we have SSRI drugs that they prescribe for people and the grooming of children to tell them they're in the wrong body, getting them confused, depressed, suicidal, then giving them SSRI tr drugs. So we need to focus

on what the real problem is. He refused to accept transgender people they say or that a person could identify as a different gender than the one that they're born with. So he believed that people who were transgender had a mental illness and needed brain treatment. Well he was right about that.

schools need to be radically altered or abolished. I'm in favor of them being abolished. No one government should have no role in education. He won't say that now.

it happen again. He's sharing Trump in the middle of the pandemic. This is why I said, I have some issues with him, and I think that, you know, to think that Trump was fixing the border was delusional and extreme, I think. And then polarizing quotes. He said, I'm sorry, if I see a black pilot, I'm going to be like boy, I hope he's qualified. But she said during a twenty twenty four podcasts where he was probably talking

about DEI. That's not anything that hasn't been said over and over again by Walter Williams when he used to guest hosts for Rush Limbaugh. You know, he would say, as a black man, he felt that the affirmative action, which is what DEI is the successor to. He said, he earned his degree, but people think that he got his degree simply because he was given a lower standard because he was black, And Walter Williams spoke out against that, essentially saying the same thing. So again they're trying to

portray him as a racist. They work that way because they went to that is their standard defense is to bring the accusation of racism to anybody that they disagree with. It's exactly what Israel is doing too. So in February last year, while discussing capital punishment, he said children should watch people being killed using the death penalty, That executions should be public, death penalty should be public, should be quick,

should be telewised. I think at a certain age it's an initiation, he said, before adding that the crime rate would go down if kids had witnessed an execution. Well, again, that's something that I would disagree with him on, but you know, you know the reason that they're putting that there. We're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back in just a moment here. Actually, no, wait, we're going to take a break.

sort of invisible line has been crossed. As Constantin Kissin has pointed out, who is a commentator on a podcast called trigger Anometry, said, I'm who, I'm wrong, But tonight it feels like some sort of invisible line has been crossed that we didn't know was there. Last time, I felt like this was nine to one one. It was clear, without knowing the how and the what, that the world was about to change forever, like the rules of the game had been permanently altered and there was simply no

going back to the innocent, peaceful past. I didn't feel like this when an attempt was made on President Trump's life, he said, Yeah, it's because it looked like it was fake. To me, I don't know how he could recover from a graze to his ear that he claimed that he had so quickly like that. But to murder a young father simply for doing debates and mobilizing young people to vote for a party that represents half of America, this

is something else, he said. And I agree, and that maybe I want strong arguments to say that it was engineered. I don't know if it was or if it was the you know, certainly this even if it was organic and as a result of this person's trainee mindset. You know, with all the stuff that's there that in and of itself, folks, is engineered, no question about it. Why don't we address the root cause of that.

and they would pump you full of drugs. And that is what happens on a mass scale to the American people.

I would just say wait until Trump goes to war with the drug cartels that the war on drugs has created, just like they created al Capone's gang. You're going to start to see assassinations like people have been seeing for a long time in Mexico, and imagine what's going to happen with that. And I think that is one of the things that's going to come out of the extra legal war on drugs as it goes hot instead of

a cold war. He took young people seriously, saw college campuses as the ideological incubators that they are for both good ideas and for toxic ones. While will the many MSNBC pundits who said nasty things face any potent political consequences. One has been fired, but the mass just keeps slipping every time this kind of thing happens. A few months ago, a free Palestiner named Elias Rodriguez murder too young Israeli embassy staffers on the eve of their engagement outside an

event for young Jewish professionals. Professionals. There was the murder of the healthcare executive Brian Thompson, for which Luigi Mangione will be prosecuted by New York, Pennsylvania and the federal government. Prominent Democrats like AOC seem to think that stricter gun control, something Kurt would have vociferously opposed, will stop at all. No, the rot is deeper, and it's not just left on right.

There's also that right wing crazy who shot and killed several Minnesota so to state legislators in June, for example. But there's also a disturbing strain that is emerging specifically on the left that makes light of political violence and seems to revel and bad things happening to the ideological enemies, like we're all play acting, like the deadly violence isn't real and concrete. And that's the thing. These kids who

do this stuff, they really are detached from reality. Yeah, yeah, it is just like a shooter game to them.

the left. Some of my Christian friends have agreed. But Christianity conquered the world by being the opposite of worldly hate. I don't think now is a good time to give that up. And again, this is not simply an issue that we want. Like from the perspective of Richard Dawkins, it's much more involved and important than just Christianity or

Christen dumb or a Christian culture. He said, beat the left by seeking the welfare of the community in which you live, get married, have children, pray for your community. There you will find your welfare. And this is basically, in a sense a paraphrase of what God told the people who are in captivity in Babylon. He said, I know the plans I have for you, right plans to prosper, not to harm. And he gave them exactly that advice. He said, plant your crops, build your homes, build your families.

And that's the way that we need to pursue this, not in this tit for tat, eye for an eye, tooth for tooth. Let's hate them more than they hate us type of approach. And at the same time, part of that is to prepare to make sure that we can protect our family and ourself from crazy things and crazy people. That's what we're going to be talking about when we come back with Acklass.

They are both thick volumes, have got a lot of dense information and he's got passages from other experts as well, so you can find a lot of information about how to defend yourself in uncertain times, protect your community, find food, find water, make sure that you are not completely vulnerable in a scenario seems more and more likely every single day.

fabric of American society. Yes, insanity going on, and people are not going to have a problem until there's a problem. Then they've got a problem. And if you're not prepared, you know, it's it's like Colonel Douglas McGregor says, it's going to be on top of people before they can do anything about it. So, yes, you need you need to get out there and get some get some basics done, protect you yourself, your wife, your partner, your family, whatever, friends. Anyway, yes, I agree.

of higher learning have programmed people. I think all of these people are getting so wound up in all of the injustices that they imagine through their educational system, mostly that it's just corrupting their brain cells and causing them to want to become violent people.

the children from kindergarten on the earlier the better. We need to understand that as well, and we need to take that back. We need to take our children back from the state we were talking about.

And I think that they the family needs to get their kids out of the school system. And if we did that enough, we might be able to get a consensus that we don't want to pay these confiscatory school taxes anymore. And that could be the end of the system. This building that is burning down and taking our society

with it. And so that's that's what I would hope you had a very moving statement in your substack about the death of a child that that you came across when you were there fighting in Africa.

they went into a frenzy. And I just never forget this, this little baby that I don't know, six months old. I just know one thing. It was something that has never left me. But people don't see that kind of thing here I saw it firsthand. Does it make you prone to thinking about violence more? Of course it does. I see these people doing what they're doing in this country. They have no idea of the Pandora's box, the can of worms they're opening. Once it's open, you can't get

a clothed. It's very difficult. It takes a great amount of effort to restore civilization. And I look at us. I'm a student of the Spanish Civil War. There are things that are the opposite here, but I look at us as being about in nineteen thirty five. We're not far from open conflict. Is it going to be the army against leftist or leftists and the army against conservatives? I don't think so. I think what you're going to see is increasing violence between groups of people. Goes I

don't know. I hope it doesn't go to what I lived in there, and that was the car bomb. You never knew walking down the street, whether somebody's going to set a bomb off in a car and innocence kt killed.

flows from. And I interviewed she Van Fleet a while ago, and she wrote a book called Mao's America, and she said all of this anti racism and stuff, and the tactics that they're using against kids, she said that was essentially drawn directly from Mao's struggle sessions where you had to denounce your parents and denounce this and anounced that.

And she said people don't realize that that was the foundation of what was being done by mal and they think that this is something different, something that's new, but it is tied back to that and it will lead to the same type of.

you know, I mean, it was it was it. These people are are legends in their own mind. Yeah, they're fabricated legends. And the bottom line is, you know, they got a lot of blood in their hands, but they're boundy determined to try it again because we didn't get it right the last time. What is that I didn't kill enough people. I don't know what goes through the mind. You know. My neighbors in Las Vegas were escapees from Eastern Bloc countries, and I had a interesting two hours.

I went to a birthday party. I used to drink back and they're big drinkers, and I at a lull. I asked them what was communism like? What was like living in communism? They sat there, they were dumbfounded. I asked that question. They looked at each other, started chatting in their foreign language, laughing a little bit, and then

they unloaded on me. And one of the things that you have to understand is they said communism destroys hope and the spirit of man, it's naturally it's naturally antagonistic to human nature.

And then, by the way, I call Africa the continent of the apocalypse now and the land of blood in tears, because that's all I saw over there was blood in tears, a wonderful, wonderful people. The black people over there, Unfortunately, their tribal they're a little more prone to become communists and to take the hard walk on the road of democracy. It's difficult for them to understand because of the elder system they have.

we live in. Our normal reality is barbarism and war. Yes, and that's not me saying that that's C. S. Lewis, the famous Christian philosopher. I do believe we've moved away from God and Jesus and good compassion and forgiveness. And it's just showing more and more in the radical approach people are taking, not discussing anything they don't want to. You're a Nazi racist if you don't agree with them, yes, and you know you were just talking about this earlier

on your show, but it's very true. They want to silence you by calling you a Nazi, and I in turn call them lunatics because that's what they are.

And you know the first time I talked to you, Jack, we talked about how fragile the supply lines are in America and that was even before the lockdowns of twenty twenty. Then we saw that demonstrate to us just how fragile supply lines are. When we had the imposition of the lockdown rules, you wound up with empty shelves. But then on the farms, they were destroying massive quantities of food because they couldn't get it to market. And so we have a.

Defense Manual. Of course, you've had a lot of expertise in practice in that yourself personally, but you also have a lot of experts in various other parts of various other aspects that also have contributed to your book as well, David.

and I go into this in depth. I have a calculator. It's free for people to use. Go into my substock account and you can find a food and water calculator that will tell anybody if they get what they've got stored for canned food or ram in, any of those things and calculated, I'll tell you how many days of food you've got. Water. Water has also become as fragile or more so than the food system.

want to starts going the other way. But what you say, Travis, is very true. That will put a factor to this, to the problem that multiplies it exponentially.

is the thing of the past generally as people. But when you get down three four feet in the ground, and you can be twenty below zero as long as you cover the top, but you've got a fifty five degree temperature coming out of the earth that's pretty much consistent. If you keep that temperature, you keep that heat from going out. That's one where I've got all this stuff in the book. But the bottom line is this, I get into the major two issues, food and water. That's

what's going to cause problem. There's a saying that revolutions starts on hungry's stomach. Well that may be true, but chaos starts from thirsty people. Yeah, might say.

And it seems like all of the people making their plans for the new Dystopian technocracy also agreed with that time frame, because they all look to twenty thirty is the year they want to have this stuff out there. So there's going to be an acceleration of change in these next few years, and certainly you see it. You mentioned Colonel Douglas McGregor, and I guess he was talking about the various wars that they're trying to drag us into.

We've had this, they're continuing to try to escalate things with Ukraine, and as you look at France and the collapses that are happening there, they're having fires all over the place in terms of protest, and he's on I think the fifth president that they've had there or prime minister. I forget which one. I guess Macron has one title and the other guy's got another one. But they just had the government fall yet again. And so I think that's one of the reasons why you've got France and

other places pushing so hard for war. As Gerald Centi always says, when everything fails, they tried to take you to war.

you talk about the wars going on. It reminds me of the black and white movie The Bomber's Flying in nineteen eighty four. It reminds me that they're setting things up Eurasia. It's almost like or Will wrote a book and giving you the blooprint. And what they're going to do. It's quite amazing, I believe. Also don't want to sound like a Bible thumper. I want to push something first. I've got a little book that I think people can get it for nothing, and it's called uh, it's called

plus Nothing p l us Nothing. It's an introduction to Jesus Christ. And I go to head friend look at my car window and he sees, uh, he sees a Bible there and he says, Assome, what's going on? Ah? I said, that's for my Bible steady group. I said, I actually go to two of them. He said, what two Bible groups? Jack? What's happening? And I told him maybe you ought to start looking into you know, he's talking. He's very fatalistic sounding. But the bottom line is this

plus nothing book I carried around. Mayo's got his little red book. That's a little brown book I've called my little brook. You know. But I do think we're coming to a fourth turning end of times. There's just too many issues. Is that Jack Lawson getting ages? Is that Jack Lawson getting afraid of No, I'm not I want I would be missing my family and when I go on, but I'm kind of curious about what's down the road, and you know it's it's it's something religion as far

as Christianity goes. I've had my son who was Muslim and he describes that he's no longer, but he describes that religion. And I have a Jewish friend and my wife's Dewey not she baptized Christian, but describe what they think of their religion. And the one thing I believe this missing is the compassion and forgiveness they you know, outside of having those two and believing in those two things, I think you end up having a manual, not a guide book.

It's what Christ has done for us plus nothing that we do is really going to merit this. And so it is that forgiveness that is there, that ability to be able to know that you have that relationship and then to know that with that relationship you can fail and start again, fail and start again an infinite number of times. But there has to be that basis there as to what do you do with your failures? And that's Jesus Christ, isn't it?

But the first page is this plus nothing dot Com book. I have memorized it. The words were so profound and It means so much to me that actually memorize it, and that's hard for me to do.

to some of my kids. And when you mentioned Jesus, it's like you might as well have done something evil in your lifetime they find out about it's like it turns people off. And I don't think people should look at that.

The funny thing is, once they start thinking about it, they start accelerating in their effort to store food and water.

average bear knows about it. I'm not going to tell you how to arm or disarm a nuclear bomb, but at the bottom line is I never set one off, so I guess it's fairly good at what I did, and I did. I did this for I did this for fourteen months. I actually got it radiated. I believe I used to set right on the bomb case while I was doing this some picking style, right, yeah, yeah, yeah, I didn't have a cowboy hat. But anyway, it and it didn't you know, it wasn't on an aircraft. It

was in a silo. But the I have in there the basics of how you can survive. It's very if once you're in a blast area, nuclear warfare is very survivable. I've told people this and they laugh because I say the new nuclear weapons. I work in the old dirty bombs they were the first ones. They come out with thermonucletive in nineteen fifty nine. But the new bombs are

environmentally friendly. That's what they call they're green bombs. They're actually designed the material after the explosion are designed to decay at an accelerated rate.

their symbol, the bulldog. They are bulldogs and some of the toughest people I've ever run into. I mean, they just don't quit.

from the effects, and I saw that firsthand. That's probably something they'll use rather than But it puts a mushroom cloud out and I'll tell you what, I was eight hundred maybe six hundred yards from it, and I'll never ever forget it. So you know we're in We've got a lot of dangerous things going on. But the bottom line, if you want to know how to survive nuclear fall out, whatever there will be, I've got a whole chapter on

it in the book. It's it's on my website. I put that out there because I want people to know. And it's part of an article written by Physicians for Self Defense and Shane O'Connor out of KI for you, and it'll tell you what to do to prepare. Bottom line is a couple days, three days in the center of your house, keeping the air circulation from happening, and you can walk out the door and it'll be low enough Renkins, which is the measurement of radiation that you

can survive it. This is not like Chernobyl. Chernobyl was a leak of radioactive material continuing to emit and put gamma rays out. This is an explosion and explosion things burn up, are decay, and there's a big difference between these. But bottom line is that's there. There's a lot of things.

China over Taiwan. What might Chin to do? They point out, they might do a lot of things that could not even be directly traced to them. There'll be a tax on our infrastructure, on our water supply, our electricity, many other things like that. And just look at how chaotic that would be in this country. You want to ask, I've got another Jack question.

survive is a four sided box. It's it's got your survival mentality, it's got your training, it's got your equipment that you have. And the bottom line is, if any of those two sides fall in you, you don't have a survival mentality. You have got to want to survive for yourself, but as much as for yourself, more so for your your family and friends and people. Read all kinds I've I've been in situations. I probably shouldn't be walking around the planet anymore, by God's good grace. And that's all

I can figure. By all the things I went through, I managed to get out of situations, but it was also dogged determination. I don't know. Maybe maybe I got toilet trained too early. I don't know what caused this, but either that or I did too much butt hard work on a farm, but I just didn't let go until I got out of something. And there were times where I almost gave up. But the survival mentality, you

got to want to survive. If you read the very first story in the book, you'll get into a part that says about a society less than thirty five years ago that absolutely went totally to hell and people ended up living like animals. And you'll tell or in there. The guy that wrote the story let me print it. A guy be named a Selko Selco. He's one of the most well known people in the survival in Preparedness. He said that a lot of people just died initially

in the first couple of months. They lost the will to live because their society was they had disintegrated. No water, they didn't want to put up with us, they'd rather die. There will be a lot of people that'll that'll die that way. I've had theories put to me that people with guns are going to run go around and take food and they're going to be killed off. No, I don't think so. I think the majority of them gangs, and they'll be not just criminal gangs, there'll be gangs

of people that gather together for strength to survive. This is why I push a neighborhood protection plan, getting to know your neighbors and working together with your neighbors. But if you don't have the survival mentality, you don't buy the book. If you can't get that, you're not going to survive. That's the long choice. The other thing is as long as the survival mentality, again is the preparedness,

the food and water, big big thing. Fire Arms come with it because it's the most efficient way to defend yourself. So yeah, yeah, answer your question.

been about protecting us. I'm talking about that earlier in the show. It's about protecting their agenda and themselves, and so we don't really think about that. But if you create a community and you've got some great tips and pointers on how to do that, the dues and the don'ts of doing that, and considerations from somebody who's done it, and if you don't have a community there that you've put together, you're not going to be able to survive on your own. Very important.

but it won't be that bad. And the number four it happened to me, but there was nothing I could have done about it. Anyway, that's probably the last thought going through people's minds when the lights go out.

know they're going to outwalk cars? But it's not going to happen in my lifetime. And it was even the young kids were saying that kind of thing. It's a kind of a denial that we tell ourselves, so we have to prepare for that. You know, these people were uniquely prepared to be able to keep their cars going. But still, you know when we look at this, that is the key thing.

Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com