Fri 8Mar24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

Using free speech to free minds. You are listening to the David Knight Show as the clock strikes thirteen on the eighth day of March. You're Vera Lord twenty twenty four. I'm Gardner Goldsmith filling in for David and I welcome you to the David Night Show. Thanks for being here today. We're going to be joined by three great guests to discuss big stories breaking in the news, and we're going to tear those stories apart and get great intellectual ammunition to take

with us to fight for freedom and future generations. Don't forget. You can find the David Knights Show at Rumble, at rockfinn d Live, and of course David Knight's Twitter slash X is at Liberty Terrian and please visit the David Knight Show website. You can comment inside X if you're watching there. You can also do so on Rumble and in rock Fan and we'll visit with the chatters over there. They are a great group of people. Thanks for joining

us. Welcome one and all. Well, thank you very much for your kind thoughts. A few of you knew I was going to be filling in for David today. I did my little streaming show last night. It's called Liberty Conspiracy and we do that every Monday through Friday at six pm. And you can find that, of course on Rockfin and Rumble. And you might know my work from MRCTV, the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell's group,

which has been going for now thirty six into its thirty seventh year. And I want to acknowledge and thank all the fine folks at MRCTV for allowing me to do work for them videos, writing on constitutional items, economic stories and things like that, and I want to thank you for joining me. We're gonna have a great day today on Tap. Today we'll be visited by the great James Bouvard. His latest book, Last Writes, just came out about

a month and a half ago. We'll talk to James Bouvard about the state of the Onion address, and then shortly after that we'll be joined by Toby Leary, co owner of Cape Gunworks in Hyannis, Massachusetts, very close to the Kennedy compound. But we've got to be very careful, and he'll be talking to us a little bit about the bumpstock argument in the Supreme Court, as well as some big things that have been happening, and he's been fighting

so hard in the Massachusetts legislature. In fact, it's in the Gardner Hall. I didn't even know there was one, but it's my name goes back to the family that was around Massachusetts way back in the old days, so it probably has some connection to my family. And I'm sorry about that, Toby, but he has fought so hard to try to stop the expansion of the government of Massachusetts and their attempts to throw darts at the Second Amendment.

And we'll be joined by Gerald Celente in the eleven o'clock hour. Of course, Gerald Cilente of Trend's Journal. Always terrific to talk to Gerald, and I always love it because I get to tap into that jazz vibe. So welcome one and all. Remember you can always donate at Rockfin and Rumble, and I welcome you to do so. As we gather together, and as I say on my program, we try to turn all their political frowns upside

down. We try to put a smile on things while we derive long lasting intellectual ammunition to defend freedom against those who would debase the currency that they force us to use, and debase the very concept of rights. Once the concept

of rights has been debased by the predators, all the rest follows. If they are unwilling to recognize your right to exist as a sovereign individual only answerable to God and the natural rights that God gave you and other people, If they are willing to invade those natural rights, whether it's to force you to use a certain currency, or it's to force you to show a certain type of ID or to get rid of a firearm that you could use to defend

yourself, well, that debasement comes from the debasement of rights right from the start. So let's find out what's on tap today on the program one and All, that David Knight Show for three point eight twenty four. Of course we'll go into our news flash, a little abbreviated one from what I I'm doing on my show. It's the Biden State of the Political Onion edition.

Yes, we'll also mention if we get the opportunity in the program Sweden entering NATO, I might push that down a little bit as the US secretly surprised Israel with arms and they want more weapons. And of course wait to see how Joe Biden started off his State of the onion address last night. It was a very nasty, smelly onion. Should have been thrown away a long time. That concept of the police, the state imposing itself on us just

a gang of thieves and thugs. The Wall Street Journal confirmed yesterday that the Russian Ukraine peace treaty was I know, shocker, what what are you talking about? Get out of here. Yes, it was hobbled by the Brits, who would have thucket that Boris Johnson could have actually got something done. Huh ah, jeez. Yeah, pretty much everything he's done has been an

actual, absolute mess, and this was one of those things. And then we're going to be looking at Kathy Hokel breaching the Fourth Amendment in subways. I know, it's a true shocker, and how that actually ties into things that people in some of the southern states like Arizona and New Mexico have been dealing with as they try to get to work with. Of course, the immigrations and customs people pulling them over and making them engage in checks, stops.

Stop, you know, stop and show us your ID things that the American colonialists they didn't exactly dig that, and they lifted arms to a pose strange how times have changed, isn't it. Well, some people are opposing them and fighting for freedom. Thanks for doing so, everybody. Let's see what our first story is. It is, of course, the political state of the Union, or, as the Kinks might have said, perhaps a state of confusion confus. I always loved the Kinks, and I gotta say

I'd love to love for those two brothers to get playing together again. But that's okay. They gave us some great music. And if you get a chance, I mentioned to my audience, Ray Davies has a wonderful set of country songs, all admiring American freedom. Actually, so check out Ray Davies. He is, of course fantastic. And so let's talk about the State of the Union and what happened just before the State of the Union. First off, a couple of blush stories here. You might have heard about this

just before Joe Biden arrived at the State of the Union. As we can see here from Clarence Williams not Clarence Williams the third who wrote this for the Washington Post, pro Palestinian protesters blocked roads near the Capitol. Then a young teenager eighteen year old man started to rev his engine at them, and of course police got him out of the car and arrested him. And the Palestinians know they weren't calling for the end of the Jewish people, as so many

of the deep state Rhino people tried to depict. Folks who were just asking for the United States to stop sending weapons to the Israeli government. How about that, How about just a ceasefire? That would be an interesting thing to see. Well, they also could stop sending weapons and money and a lot of other things like advice, telemetry, satellite information to things like oh Ukraine,

even as NATO expands. If you didn't get to see this, one anti war noted that NATO has accepted Sweet Sweden, which, of course, for decades was always the non combatant. It was always the in between neutral force during the Cold War. Well now they've joined NATO, because, of course, NATO was formed to stop the expansion of the Soviet Union. And

then once the Soviet Union ended, well you know what happened. NATO kept expanding, Yes, of course, and the United States got involved in overthrowing the elected government of Ukraine in late December twenty thirteen with the Maidan Kub coming into twenty fourteen with Victoria Neulin and Jeffrey Piatt discussing the fact that they were going to work with the Nazis in the Slovada Party, like Ola tiani Bach. And yes, there are photographs of John McCain and Joe Biden meeting with

Ola tiani Bach, who is an overt Nazi. And there are photographs of other people like let's see Joe Biden, Amy Klobashar, Chris Murphy, the Senator from from Connecticut, and Lindsey Graham all hanging out with that wonderful guy. Awesome stuff. Right. Well, now Sweden has joined the expanding NATO, which I hate to say it, but many of the people back when I was a big Cold warrior told me, you know, NATO's really looking pretty aggressive here as the Soviet Union winds down. Well they were right,

they were absolutely right. And so what do we see here? The final bit as we prepare to look at the State of the Union address, is that Joe Biden got heckled right off the bat. It wasn't about the Palestinians, it wasn't about Gaza, it wasn't about Ukraine. It was about the pull out from Afghanistan. A man got up and said, remember Abbi Gate used marines. A protester said, and there he is. And as they note here at USA today, Abbigate is a reference to a twenty twenty one

suicide bombing during the evacuation of Afghanistan. The protester was handcuffed. That you know, house of the people that he helped pay for was handcuffed and arrested after being escorted escorted out by security from the house gallery. I think the security was armed. I don't know, but you know, to me, that's that's sort of a bit of gun violence there. And you know, Joe Biden very keen on getting rid of guns, as you mentioned in his

State of the onion. Let's see how everything started off with the State of the Union address as we head into it right now and check things out. This is Joe Biden getting lots and lots of applause, and then things didn't exactly go his way even though he were speaking very rapidly. What's the difference between and an emotion? They're giving us another one of these little things. There we go. Okay, Joe wasn't pleased. It looked like we would do good aamning. Good name me. If I were smart, I go

home. Now. You remember, anybody, remember how he talked about how he had a much higher IQ than somebody else when he was running for president. Well he's much more humble now, isn't that great? Mad, that he's president? You got it? Oh, what a guy, What a charmer? Huh, mister speaker, Mad and Vice President, Members of Congress, my fellow Americans. In January nineteen forty one, Franklin Roosevelt came to this chamber to speak to the nation, and he said, I addressed in

a moment I'm precedented in the history of the Union. Hitler was on the march. War was raging in Europe. President Roosevelt's purpose was to wake up Congress and alert the American people that this was no ordinary time. So immediately he opens sort of equating these times to the post Pearl Harbor era. And of course, anybody who's aware of what Roosevelt did to sit up Pearl Harbor is already hearing alarm bells because he's trying to make a reference to Ukraine,

as if the United States is in any danger because of Ukraine. But that's the way they're going to depict it. They're just carrying on the Russian medaling. Now it's Russian expansion, and if we don't watch it, Vladimir Putin will turn into a laser beam and cross the Atlantic Ocean. Freedom and democracy

runner assault in the world. This is coming from the guy, of course, who mandated jabs on people to go across borders if they wanted to engage in trucking, and carried on the ridiculous emergency order from Donald Trump of March of twenty twenty that set all the dominoes in motion for many corporations to mandate jabs, state governors to engage in their emergency lockdowns, completely contrary to half of the Bill of Rights. But you know, I don't swear an oath

to the Constitution. It's just him. So let's continue give him a little more time, shall we. Tonight I come to the same chamber to address the nation. Now it's we who face on president moment in history of the UN. You so fascinat he's talking too. That was weird. People are commenting on this, like what what is in his system? Yes, my purpose tonight is to wake up the Congress and alert the American people that this is no ordinary moment either, not since President Lincoln in the Civil War.

Our freedom and democracy you've been undersold at home as are today. What makes our moment rare is a freedom of democracy or under attack at both at home and overseas at the very same time. Now, I know what you're thinking. You're saying, Wait a minute, when he's talking about freedom and democracy, wasn't the United States government involved with the overthrow of the elected leadership of Ukraine and that would then lead to the installation of a new president that was

chosen by people who associated with US. I mentioned Johnny Bak when they got rid of Yanikovich and they brought in Yatson yuk Was that the democracy that he's discussing. How about the fact that the leadership of Hamas is in cutter and I'm still not hearing Joe Biden who says that Hamas is so terrible, right, of course, and that everything started on October seventh in Israel and had nothing to do with the Palestinians being pushed back over and over again since nineteen

forty seven, you know that sort of thing. How about the fact that the United States ended up supporting Hamas and they're still not asking for extradition of the Hamas leaders from Cutter, you know, an ally of the United States. I don't know. It's something that sort of rings hollow to me. What do you think drop your comments in rock Fins. Hez Putin of Russia is on the march, invading Ukraine and sewing chaos throughout Europe and beyond.

If anybody in this room thinks Putin will stop at Ukraine, I assure you he will not. Yes, I know there must have been some sort of attack on Kamala Harris's seat. She was nodding. Of course, she's an expert on international relations and paramilitary strategy and the history of Ukraine. She knows a lot about it. She obviously listened to the Tucker Carlson Vladimir Putin interview where he engaged in that very good, very detailed, in very true history

of Ukraine and Russia. She obviously knows all about it. And well, you know, she's just very excited about freedom for the people in Ukraine who haven't had an election. They have no freedom of religion. And for some strange reason, I didn't see Joe Biden bring up the name Gonzalo Lira. While he was talking about this, you know, an American reporter who was killed, you know, for journalism in Ukraine. I didn't see that,

but Kamal has got to applaud it isn't that great? Yeah, But Ukraine, Ukraine can stop Ukrainie can stop Putin if we stand with Ukraine and provide the weapons that means the defend itself. That is all. That is all Ukraine is asking. They're not asking for American soldiers. So let's get this

straight. The State of the Union address here in the United States, among all the many things that all the canards that Joe Biden is going to push, and we'll talk with James Boulevard about those things regarding the economy, the gun violence somehow being under his control to be able to bring down when he's so called bans something that people on the black market will get. And of course by so called banning, and he breaches our rights, he breaches the

Second Amendment, all those things. Before he gets to any of that stuff, before he starts to pat himself on the back. You know, this man who's now so humble, who once said he had a much higher IQ than some guy who was in a crowd. This man, this wonderful man. He's taking the United States and equating the future of the United States with the future of Ukraine. That's great, that's awesome. I'm sure a lot of patriotic people who are still alive from World War Two and maybe they realized

that Roosevelt was a slime ball as well. Maybe they're starting to see the similar patterns in honesty, and you know, the truthfulness of both of those men being highly questionable. The debasement of truth, you might say, as the state debases our rights and of course debases the very concept of United States

sovereignty. Everything's got to be tied to all these other nation states and of course the military industrial complex, where yes, Nikki Hayley seems to have done very well after connecting with the military industrial complex and running for her presidential campaign, and she can keep any of the leftover money that she didn't spend in

her campaign. That's awesome. Well, you know, Joe wasn't very well liked by the protesters, but he was well liked by the Democrats, and even the Speaker of the House seems to go along with certain things that even though he might pose as a guy who is all in favor of America. Strangely enough, the Speaker of the House is very much in favor of handing more money to Ukraine and handing more money to Israel, as long as he

gets some of the gravy that he wants. And if you've been following Thomas Massey, you'll see that there's a lot of different flavors to that gravy, like Lindsey Graham introducing a lot of pork barrel spending bills into his Senate side of things, which is interesting because, as I've mentioned, according to the Constitution, all spending bills are supposed to originate in the House. So of course that's one of the big questions people have about the Obamacare issue. But

we'll continue real quick. You got to hear this a little bit from our friend, our pal Amtrak Joe. In fact, there are no America soldiers war in Ukraine, and I'm determined to keep it that way. Okay, So that's an outright lie. Of course it can be parsed. There's no declaration of war. Of course, there hasn't been since World War Two, which means that if if any of you know soldiers or are soldiers who are being sent overseas. Please tell them to stop, because there's nothing constitutional in

them going over there. In fact, there's really nothing constitutional to a standing army. It's supposed to be the militia. We are the militia. Anyone of gun bearing age is the militia based in our states, and they can be called up with a declaration of war, and we can answer or not answer based on our own decisions to go out in a declaration of war.

He also is lying because we know because he went and visited the one hundred and first Airborne Division two years ago almost in Poland, and openly stated, well, you're gonna find out when you go into Ukraine that a lot of these people they're they're very they're very they're very proud. Well, oh, well, some of you know that already, some of you have been there.

So he let the cat out of the bag that the hundred and first Airborne had members in it who already had been on the ground advising Ukrainians. And new information has come out, of course about the CIA bases there.

We know that Victoria Neulan admitted to the fact that there were biological bases there, and if you go back in time, you'll see the articles of all about Richard Lugar and then Senator Barack Obama going to Ukraine with billions of dollars to start up biological and chemical weapons research facilities, and of course Victoria Neulan when she answered Marco Rubio about it, he asked her other biological weapons laboratories

in Ukraine? Well, there are biological research facilities, and we're trying to make sure that the Russians don't get their hands on the research materials. As if there's just a bunch of pens left over, I should show you my David Knight pen that you can get at the David Knight David Knight dot com store, David Knightshow dot com. Check it out and check out the new hoodie. For some reason, they don't have these in Ukraine. So that was an outright lie, as was much of what he had to say about

the economy. And I would be interested to see how you feel. Are you does one get acclimated to being treated this way by the people who claim control and power over us? Is there is there a nascent growth of rebellious attitude for many Americans. Maybe you're meeting them in the stores or you have friends, you went to high school with them, you bump into them somewhere

and say, hey, how you doing. I'm getting frustrated. You know, they got kids, maybe that sort of thing, and maybe they're they're adopting the philosophy that Thomas Jefferson espoused in so many great pieces of writing, but in particular when he said, no man is born with a saddle on his back, and no man is born with spurs to ride him. Let me know what you think in Rock Fin and Rumble Chat and I would love to see what you have to say. Rumble of course very good free speech

platform, so check it out, y'all. And Rock Finn, I want to welcome Dougal Lug. Thank you for being there, Yona, thank you for being there. And Jason Barker, Jason one of the great heroes in allowing people. And by the way, Vid David Knight is just taking some time off today and he's gonna take some time off next week as well, with Easter coming up and so on, going to be with the family. Karen is there, dougle Lug is there in rock Finn, and it's such

a great home of people. Brian ded McCartney is there, and it's terrific to see you all really appreciate it. And remember, if you want to contribute to the program, you can do so during the show today and I'll feel like I did something. Yeah. And oh, by the way, Yona is mentioning the rumors of Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings. Just to let you know, I worked in a genetic research lab in college. My sister

was in the lab. I was doing the data entry, so I got to read genetic trees very well, the protein bands when they did it through electrophoresis. And so when they came out with the rumors that Thomas Jefferson, they really pushed those rumors that originally were pushed by an opponent of Thomas Jefferson politically and someone that he hired who used to work for Jefferson and then really disliked Jefferson. There's I saw the protein bands that they claimed were from Jefferson

and I realized and then this is just solid knowledge. There's no possible way that Thomas Jefferson fathered Sally Hemmings kids. It was probably someone in Jefferson's family. But they compared the elect faresis gels of genetics of Thomas Jefferson and genetics of Sally Hemmings and where that the line had to be, and it couldn't have been Jefferson because there were certain things that would have had to have been

passed down and they weren't passed down. Also, just to let you know, later on Reason magazine published a study that was done by twelve scholars and geneticists, and eleven of the twelve agreed that it wasn't Jefferson who fathered Sally Hemming's children. So I just wanted to mention that to you, Yona, if you want to check it out, you could probably still find the Reason

magazine coverage of that. It was many years ago. But strangely, of course, that information came out just at the time that the Bill Clinton Monica Lewinsky thing came around. Is if you know, you got to find some equivalency of all that. So I want to show you a couple other things that are happening with the Biden regime. First off, there's this Biden renews

valed to ban assault weapons and high capacity magazines. And this you'll see the protest if it comes forward for us here, let's get this rolling there, we go, deserve the freedom to be safe, and America is safer today than when I took office. Year before I took office, murder race went up thirty percent, thirty percent, they went up, the biggest increase in history. It was then through my American Rescue Plan, which every American voted

against. I'm mad had I think he means every Republican voted against that. Well, at least they tried to do that, probably not for constitutional reasons, probably just for political posturing. But you can see the speaker shake his head there. That's I think the only good thing I've seen him do in

the past week, because Biden was clearly lying. Violent crime rates have risen throughout the United States, and of course, if you look at the gun purchase statistics, every time purchases of guns go up, the violent crime rate goes down in the United States. And of course, if you look at the history of England and Australia when they imposed their big gun control measures,

they've done it twice. Now in Australia, the violent crime rate actually increased the first time, and the violent crime rate did not get back to its original normal levels from the nineteen nineties. I think they imposed their first gun buy back in the late nineteen nineties, maybe nineteen ninety six or nineteen ninety nine. That was after the Port Arthur massacre, and Harps would probably be able to speak more on that, but he being from Australia underneath the Southern

Cross. It's quite interesting because violent crime did not go down, including gun crime, did not go down to its original pre ban levels until after people started to purchase more weapons in the black market. And then just about two years ago the Australian government had to or they said they had to impose another gun mandated gun buyback. Yeah. Now in England they pretty much restricted all gun purchases and they limited gun ownership to you could own a twenty two caliber

gun, but it had to be at a hunting club. And now they're even trying to stop that. And it is quite amazing to me to see that people like Cohn and others in the UK will not acknowledge that all of their attempts to stop peaceful people from acquiring firearms have backfired, just like Biden's attempt to claim that gun measures are going to equate to a safer society. And I brought this example up to people. I've said this before in my

program. If you want an example of the behavior of criminals, John Lott has written a lot about this. If they are aware that, and they've interviewed criminals about hot burglaries versus cold burglaries. Hot burglaries or when they don't case a house. Cold burglaries are when they case a house to make sure nobody's there. The hot burglary rate is much higher in the UK and in

Australia per capita. They've interviewed people in prisons and it's in John Lott's first big book on guns, More Guns, Less Crime, and they say, yeah, we case the place because we don't want to confront somebody who might be armed. Now imagine this. Imagine you're in a paintball competition. Someone bets you ten thousand dollars that if you can enter one of three buildings and hit twenty people with a paintball pellet those people, you'll get ten thousand dollars.

You got to do it within ten minutes or seven minutes. But if you get hit by somebody who has a paintball gun, you will lose forty thousand dollars. Building one has a person has you know, you are assured that nobody in it has a paintball gun. Building two might have some people with paintball guns. You don't know. Building three, you are assured every person has a paintball gun. What is going to happen to your behavior?

Which building will you choose? It's very clear, It's very clear. And so let's get more information about the amazing truth telling of Joe Biden from a man who told us, watch out everybody, because it looks like Joe Biden is going to be, of course telling us a little bit we might not want to believe in the state of the Union. I do this on my program. I like to call it the mind meld. It's time for the mind meld. One and all our guest, James Bouvard, I must try

to mind meld with it. And our minds are merchant doctor, our minds are one. I feel what you feel. I know you know. Yes, indeed, from my old days working at Star Trek Voyager. I now welcome our guest, James Bouvard. James, welcome to the show. Thank you for being with us. You wrote a great piece that was published and I got to discuss it on my show. Was published on the sixth for The New York Post entitled Joe Biden's State of the Union Shrink shrinkflation swindle.

And you warned us that Joe might not exactly be playing honest with statistics or the reason for the economic problems we're having. And of course we'll be blaming businesses. We're just trying to cater to customers. Welcome to the David Knight Show, James, thank you for being here. Thank you for that article and also your new book, which is phenomenal. I love it. I really appreciate all that you've done. Really really good last rites, James Bovard,

Welcome to the show. Hey, Garda, thanks for having me back. Great to see you again. And it's as good to both of us. Can take a victory lap for Binden's speech, Yes, tell us a little bit about what you saw. I was struck. In fact, I was bowled over, but not necessarily surprised. If those two can come together, the Beatles would say, because he opened with well, America's national security is dependent upon Ukraine. That was the first thing in the State of the

Union for the United States speech. That was just stunning. Then there were the other accouterments about how quickly he was speaking. Maybe he thought that if he spoke more rapidly, people wouldn't notice his falsehoods. Tell us your impressions, Jim. Well, it was like the old Disney movie Old Yeller, because he's there just kind of flapping away. And it was surprising to see that the you know, the entire White House, in his re election campaign,

has decided to go on a message of hatred. He was exaggerating so much the faults of people who did not support him. It reminded me of his speech in Near Valley Forge where he openly compared Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler. It which reminded me of his Philadelphia speech in September twenty twenty two, where it would practiced like a Nuremberg rally with the bright red background, but there was a level of vitriol. Historian Henry Adams one hundred years ago said,

politics has always been about the systematic organization of hatreds. Oh wow, great, And that was you know, that's the line to understand Bind's speech and his entire message. And I mean this is certainly not Donald Trump is not innocent on this score as well. Trump has hit the vitriol so hard. But it's funny that you've got bind claiming that the that the that the upcoming election will show the will of the people. But you've got two major

candidates who are just doing so much demonizing and so many falsehoods. But Biden was there, He's supposed to be to say, of the union. Then instead it's the absolute evil of everyone who doesn't bow down to Joe Biden. You know, James, as I as I show show off your excellent X feet it's at Jim Beauvard, at Jim Bouard, and you have all the books out there. Last Rite's most prominent. I want to show that on the screen to everybody. Just phenomenal stuff. Jim, you know, absolutely

what a great book. And I love the fact that, uh, you know, the look of it is so similar to Lost Right. When did Lost Rights come out? Like ten ten years ago? Ten years ago? Put a knife in my heart. No, it was thirty years ago. Hold smoke, Yeah, it was thirty years ago, and it was you know, that was back in the golden age of liberty. So I had some fun with the with the New York Post last weekend on Saturday, out of peace talking about Merle Haggard and the song that he did is a Free

Life Over is the best of the free life behind us. And it's interesting to think when he's saying that, is like, hey, you know, these are gonna get a hell of a lot worse after that song came out. Oh yeah, you know. It's it's always strange. You think to yourself, well, it couldn't get any worse, you know, and it just gets it gets crazier because of course, you know, it's the nature of people involved with the state to try to find more areas where they can

get the state involved in people's lives. It gives them power. And you mentioned, you know that that use of the lever of hatred would do you think it would be fair Jim to uh to say that they also lever fear and they're they're sort of, uh, they're sort of stranded together in a

in a Gordian knot in a way. You know, they will portray the Russia Ukraine conflict and they'll they'll gin up fear, well, the United States we've got to defend, We've got to do this, We've got to do that, and in a way it helps generate hatred against the thing that which we're supposed to fear. Yeah. Well, Buying last night was saying that it's perfectly clear that if if the if Russia has not stopped in the Ukraine, then they'll go further and attack other nations. And it's like, well,

uh, do you have any evidence, sir? Uh? And I you know the you know, the sad thing is is about the only evidence, the the the only source of evidence that we had on government information, uh, accurate government information on Ukraine just pled guilty in going to prison for sixteen years. That gentleman from the Massachusetts National Guard airmen, yes, who

was Yeah, and he shared that information on his discord. Yeah. And it's striking to see that the media that has basically, you know, the information which he disclosed, the official documents showed that the US most of the US media has been a shoveling official bs on Ukraine for the last two years, ever since it started the war. And yet there wasn't that much media

rage at having been lied to and deceived. Instead, a lot of the media folks jumped on say, well that son of a gun violated government rules by disclosing this information. Yeah, fine, throw them in prison and throw away the key. It's sad, I mean there was you know, it's sad to see how far the nation has fallen since Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon

papers fifty years fifty years ago. It's one you know, Jim, obviously you know I've I've admired your work so long, but that the way that you, with such fluidity can mention these people because they they really deserve to be brought in as we remember them and maybe gain some sustenance and energy from some of the things that they did that we admire, you know, in Ellsberg one hundred percent. And I'll bring up as you discussed this air National

guardsman from Massachusetts. I mean you lived, like you know, forty five minutes an hour away from where I am in New Hampshire. Was all the news in Boston. Obviously the New York Times somehow found out about it released that information. And what is interesting is you're absolutely right. First you have

written on this numerous times. There's such a glut of stuff that the government produces that is so called classified during a time of no declared war in any way whatsoever, and even when people issue Foyer request, much of the stuff has redacted whether it's you know, Foyer requests to get information about the MRNAH or his Fourier requests about anything else. The government is still in control of what they're going to tell you. And one of the things that you just

brought up to me, I would like to show this to you. You can listen to the audio Jim Marco Rubio literally admitting on Fox New Sunday that all along, all along, he knew, he knew all along that Ukraine was not going to be successful in its quixotic quest to battle Russia. After of course nine years of slaughter in the Dombas with the you know, Nazi Azoh Battalion related people that the United States seem to have no problem with in

any way whatsoever. After Amy Klobashar and others and Lindsey Graham met with Tiany Bak of the Slovada Party, the Nazi party there, and they helped cobble

together that that government under Yatsumyuk in twenty fourteen. This is Marco Rubio actually openly admitting what that young man exposed, but of course not acknowledging like well, yeah, you know, yeah, we should have told you from the start, and we should remember, as we hear this, he voted every time there was the major final vote for more weapons and money to go to Ukraine, even though now he's admitting, well, you know, I knew

all along that there was no possibility they could win. Let's check this out. Sure to do that. Here's what I do know. There is no way that the Russian Federation takes Ukraine, all of Ukraine half of Ukraine. And that was that was Putin's goal from the beginning, was to carve it up into half, at least half the country, including Kiv. That's not

going to happen. That's not going to happen. On the other side of it, we have the reality of it is that Ukraine is small compared to Russia in terms of size and its ability to bring scale, its ability to force conscript people. So neither kind of this is I'm just being honest, And you know, in the past I have tried not to talk about this public because I thought it undermined the leverage that Ukraine had. But now it's the reality. Neither side is going to be able to achieve victory as defined

in the most idealistic term. All right, So Jim, you know It's really amazing how many tens of thousands of people in Ukraine have had their homes

destroyed. Men and women now been pulled into that meat grinder. And now Joe Biden wants even more money to go to Ukraine, and he's going to find a way to use the so called draw down authority to pull more from the US military banks and send it over over to Ukraine, even after we just found out, as anti war dot com reported, and I'll show this to the audience, antiwar dot Com reported that there were one hundred arms deals

that were secretly done between the Biden administration is in Israel after October seventh. They are reckless, they have no compunction whatsoever. They will lie to us. They will lie through omission, as Marco Rubio did for months and years actually with Ukraine, and they don't care. Well, it was interesting seeing that Cliff from Marco Rubio, and he was so the Center admitted that he made a lot of misleading statements, but it was okay because otherwise he was

being careful not to undermine the leverage of a foreign government. Now I don't I don't recall the oath of office of a US sounders saying that they're also that they have a legal moral obligation to maintain the leverage of foreign governments. Uh so, but that was that was what he was saying. That's somebody backing up outside the office. I'm thinking, like the hell is this anyhow?

Yeah, oh my computer is dying. Uh but no, So going back to Rubio, I mean it's it's it's good he's honest about his previous deceit. We trust him going forward. Yeah, I don't think so. I'm not sure it would. No, I won't make that crew joke. And you know, it's only it's only veracity, it's only honesty based on its situational ethics. It's pure situation situational ethics. For him. It doesn't matter that it's a consequentialist philosophy. There's no morality to it in any way

whatsoever, Truth doesn't matter. It's whatever is convenient to get by with what you want at the time. Well, and part of what I was wondering watching the scene there in the capital last night, before and after buying speech, seeing all these folks, men and women out there glad handing each other, and seeing seeing a law of there was older well fed women wearing their white dresses. I was, you know, I was thinking Center. I

don't recall seeing Center Menendez there. I assume he was there. He's been indicted for taking a lot of bribes from foreign lobbyist activists, but at least he appreciates the value of gold versus the US monitor typic a good point. Yeah, there was gold bars, and so I was just I was wondering

there. I said, how many of the people in that room, how many of them deserve to be indicted on the same kind of federal charges that the Biden Just Department and earlier Just apartments used against American citizens because there are so many, you know, the members of Congress are practically exempt from federal

law. I mean, a person has to be so brazen, a person has to be said, damn gredy and stupid that they have gold bars and hundreds of thousands of dollars of cash laying around their house, as the allegations are against Center Menendez, because otherwise it's going to be like, you know, well, you know, well, it's important whatever. But to see what the politicians as a class get away with. At the same time the government is persecuting private citizens for I mean, don't give me this role of

law bs. Yeah. Yeah, so true, so true. And you know, you know, you know how I'm a voluntarist anarchist obviously, James, and you know, monitor things. What's that I was making a joke. I said, you are a moderate. I'm okay, way, maybe you're not a monern Okay, I'm ann to you. How about that? That sounds great? And it is. It is interesting because you know that we often hear this are we, which is of course the pronoun of forced inclusion. Are we going to do this? Are we going to do this?

We have to do this, we must do this, America cares and so on and so forth. When the government institutes policies of forced inclusion, forcing people to pay for something, the we is a pronoun of aggressive inclusion. You have no choice. You're going to be included no matter what. You are part of the WEI, whether you want to be part of it or not. And is will the people? Yeah? Yeah. This state of the union on a macro level exposes the absolute canard of the idea that

there's any rule of anything for these people. Because if I don't want to be part of their union, can I say no, of course, not the throw me in jail. I've got to keep paying, or I've got a flee to some other place. I didn't see that I signed up for that. I never signed the constitution. And even if I had signed the constitution, these people are breaching it all the time. They're the ones who you know, they sign up to swear an oath to it and put their

hands on the Bible. Right. And so we look at things like all their ridiculous controls on light bulbs, and their attempts to control ceiling fans and eliminate the internal combustion engine car and all these different things that they add and add an add of course, because they make us fear what could be coming.

They don't provide real evidence regarding the climate change, anthropogenic climate change boogeyman or whatever it might be regarding you know, car outputs from internal combustion engines. Got to do it for us, then they have the audacity to say they're saving us money. Of course, in the free market, we have to decide when do we want to save money, how do we want to do it, and in what process we have trade offs. They don't allow

that. So this inclusive we thing is perfect, and it just shows the lie because it's if it were a real union, I would have a choice, just like the South would have had a choice to be able to separate and say no, thank you. I can't perpetuate my union with somebody else. So how is it I get roped into all this stuff? I never said, yes, well, it's just good you're not bitter. That's classic. Hey, by the way, Jim, let's talk about the economy for

a minute. And the shrink flation claims. Okay, Joe Biden. Right, so your piece that was published on the sixth, I have the New York Post version of this, Joe Biden's State of the Union shrith shrinkflation swindle. And you bring up an excellent point, which is, of course, course that since Biden took office, the purchasing power of the US dollar has shrunk by eighteen percent. And yeah, and Biden keeps, yeah, sorry,

go ahead. This is eighteen percent according to the federal government. I mean, if the if the US government was still using the same measures of inflation that were used in the nineteen seventies, I guess it would be what twenty five twenty eight percent decrease. It's a whole lot worse than what they admit. Yeah, and of course part of the reason is because they exclude

certain things from their cost of living indexes. And they also, you know, they do this all all the time with things like the employment numbers. You know, they'll explore, oh my god, yeah, they had a hell of adjustment this morning on that. Yeah, Jackuary, Well actually, you know, my goodness, they always do that, and we knew that. You know, after about the first week, heading into the second week,

we start to get the inflation numbers and the employment numbers. And at first they always put out their rosy employment numbers, and then they adjust them, and they all put out, like Biden will claim, well, unemployment or inflation inflation has gone down, so they're implying that prices are going down.

But for example, there was a couple month period, not an entire period, but for a couple months last year there was a slight change from say three point five percent inflation down to three point twenty five percent inflation month on month, and then it went back up to three point five that sort

of thing. So they claimed that, well, inflation is going down, but year on year inflation, that means it's gone up, inflation has the prices of things have gone up, And of course the inflation is really the inflation of the money supply, the debasement of the money supply. And you know, even under Donald Trump, people are aware. If you've got the government and spending trillions of dollars and the Cares Act, that's money that's being

invented out of nowhere. No wonder bitcoin is doing so well, No wonder gold is on the rise, No wonder silver is on the rise. Because those things you can't just invent them out of thin air. Yep. I mean, there are so many different ranches the government has thrown into the nation's economic engine. But part of what struck me Biden was doing his fingerprinting on the shrinkflation on a decreased number of chips in a bag, a snack bag

of snack food. But Biden has given himself an absolute waiver for all the damage he's inflicted. It's the same as what the FEDS did for Pfizer and their COVID vaccines, an absolute waiver of liability for any damage. I mean everything that Biden has done that's screwed up the nation's productivity, investment savings. You know, value the dollar. It doesn't matter because Biden is taking a brave stand against decreasing the number of potato chips in the snack bag. You

had a video. I'm going to show this on the screen. You had a video and they showed the snack bag. You can sort of see it

in the background on the screen there. It really is amazing too, because they they are always ready with the bad guy, as I mentioned, the boogeyman, and it's it's truly a sad thing to think that politicians come up with these things and so often people just accept the idea of well, there can be calls for, say, anti trust hearings on Chuck Schumer doesn't like the number of cereal boxes that are on the shelves, or Bernie Sanders doesn't

understand why there's more than only a couple Mark brands of anti perspon or deodorant. You know, I don't know whether he wore that when he was in Moscow celebrating the great economic wonders of Russia just before to collapse. Well, yeah, that and his face mask last night. Oh unbelievable. What I'm curious about? Oh sorry, Jim, go ahead. Yeah, so I was gonna say thanks for pulling up the screen on the the shot there. The the folks that the New York Post made a video yesterday. They had

me doing a spiel for the article. And it's the first time I've been on the New York Post YouTube video channel. And they were very very good at that. It was great. Yeah, the way they did inserts and cookie monster and so on, it was fun. It was fun. It was and uh it was it was very deft on their part and they dropped some of the things I said and kept others. And they had the They had the funny thing about the the the Seinfeld shrinkage thing to start, which

I suggest with George. Yeah, yeah, and uh, it's shrinkage. It's shrinkage, and it's like, you know, you know. But the real trouble with is the person power of the dollars that I have have shrunk eighteen percent. So I don't give a rasp patuita about potato chifs. But hey, and I'm an independent contractor. I mean there is a number of places that I write for that have not adjusted their pay scales. I don't

forget it. But it's it's it's like I don't it's you know, it's not like I'm a government worker that I snap my finger and say give me my cola. Okay, the you know, there was nine percent inflation in twenty twenty two whatever, so give me that nine percent raise. I'm an

independent contractor. I don't have that leverage. Yeah, And it's it's very frustrating because you know, I think you probably echo many of the conversations people have had with their friends and family members saying, look, you know, my capacity to expand my earnings can only expand a certain amount as I try to work harder, do more, you know, on a second job or something like that. But my costs are going up, so we've got to cut back. We've got to do this, We've got to do that.

Yeah, you know, and it's it's really sad because of course, there's so many rich experiences people could have, or visits people could have with each other, or just some of the more essential fundamentals of well, you know, we're gonna have to Grandma's going to you know, be have to go to a different facility. We can't afford this facility over this facility, or and you know, this medicine. And it's really it's a it's a real shame. We can't get the medicine for the dog. This time, we're

gonna have to do a fundraiser because we're out of money. I don't have a job, that sort of thing. And the prices are just out of control. And I don't see that these people have anything other than a thirst for more control of our lives rather than freeing up the competitive market. And there, Yeah, there was a great example. The back when inflation was

at its peak. The Washington Posts had a columnus that they ran a peace find She was kind of poo poo in concerns, concerns about inflation, and she was talking about things that people could do to save money, I means such as stop eating meat. And she also talked about the costs of pet care. And it's kind of like, well, people can save money by just letting their pets die. Oh, this is a great idea. This

is this mine should take up in the speech. You know, you know, uh, your dog has live long enough, you know, oh man, well, you know, Jim. It is very interesting because for a long time, as they push for the Obamacare thing, we always heard them attacking insurance companies and saying, well, you're cherry picking people. But we know that in any centrally planned, government run collectivist resource you know, collectivized resource system, they are going to pick and choose who gets the resources.

And we're all going to be fighting over these things. You know. It is the tragedy of the commons. Every buddy's gonna want their piece that they can try to get to get the opportunity to get it for example. Yeah, that's an interesting That was what struck me as the theme of Biden's speech unspoken, but it's that people like him decide that people like Biden deserved to be in charge of who gets what. Yes, yes, it was the child. Yeah, it was like listening to the Supreme Soviet uh to a

degree, I mean, or a six hour Castro speech. Yeah, but there was this It kept coming back that Biden should be the one who, you know, who has the power to say who gets the subsidized food, gets their loans forgiven, gets this, gets that, is allowed to have that to go there, you know. And it seems as it was amusing that Biden was towards the end of the speech, he tried to portray himself as a champion of freedom, but the only freedom that by recognizes is their

freedom and terminate pregnancies. Ah so sad, and of course take my neighbor's money to help fund it. There you go. It's it's it's truly troubling. So what's next on your on your radar scope, James Bouvard? I guess I'll probably keep working my ass off and throwing rocks at the government, So, you know, just wheeling and dealing, and you know, I've got some stories I'm working on, and you know, there's there were several fresh targets that popped up from the bind Spiel last night, so you know,

I'm just looking forward to trying to keep having some fun. Well, it's great. I've I've got the Jim Bovard's website right in front of us. Your new book writes absolutely the death of American liberty, and it's just excellent stuff. And of course if people go over there, you always have your latest columns listed. And I highly recommend people watch that video that they put together from the New York Post. It is fantastic and you are terrific

on the screen, Jim. And it's so great to be able to see you talking like that. Because I miss you so much. You're such a good guy, and it's it's in fact, they're having another liberty forum here in New Hampshire coming up this coming week. Telsea Gabbart's going to be there, Glenn Jacobs is going to be there. Yeah, so I'm hoping to get on over there in Nashville, New Hampshire, and I wish you were there, man, that was great. Was that the year that Naomi Wolf

was there as well? That was the year, yes, yes, yes, that was twenty fourteen. Yeah, she was nice. She wasn't as open to the larger scope of liberty at that time, but she's really expanded a lot recently, especially you know, speaking about the Jabs and the corruption there, and it's been nice to see people really standing up against a lot of the a lot of the people who would try to connect them still to their old collectivist ways. And of course you've always been an outstanding guy.

And thank you so much. I hope you We'll check out that video at New York Post and we'll watch you as you continue to throw the bricks. Okay, Jim, Hey, thanks so much for you on Thanks for your kind words. Oh, not a problem, and you just remember we're all in this together, whether you want to be or not. Wink wink, all right, thanks all right, James Bovart, Thank you, Jim, appreciate you being here. Great great stuff from James Boulevard. What a terrific

guy. And please visit Jimbovard dot com. Everybody. If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Healey Lewis and the news, they say you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen now at APS radio dot com. You look making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show, all right to everyone. And boy, what a wonderful film, Last of the Mohicans. Huh, Michael Man, just

amazing, amazing photography, great music. I had that soundtrack myself. I know David loves that soundtrack, and so do I and I think, yes, I might have had a little crush on Madeline Stowe at the time as well. She Boy, what a terrific actress. Twelve Monkeys just awesome, and she came back in the Twelve Monkeys TV series too, So Last of the Mohicans. Great work from David Knight putting that music together. And now

let's talk about another man who does great. He is the co owner of Cape Gunworks in Hyannis, Massachusetts, the man who hosts Rapid Fire, and the man who fills in for Grace Curly often and is featured every Tuesday at two in the afternoon on the Grace Curly Show, heard on many radio stations all around North America. He is Toby Larry talking to us. Toby,

welcome to the program, the David Night Shows. I get to fill in and thanks for joining me on this platform as you work on your platform to inform people about their Second Amendment, the rights that are supposed to be protected by the Second Amendment, and some of the big news that has been happening as various political forces try to attack it. Welcome Toby, thanks for being here. Man Hey, thanks for having me guard. I appreciate it.

It's always great to be with you, and I appreciate the time that you give me and love talking about the Second Amendment so easy. It's too easy for me. Your knowledge is incredible and you always have to update these things.

Like I said, you know, it blows my mind because you know about the materials, the guns, the history, the stuff in your store, the people you work with, but then you take calls on Tuesdays with grace, and people will give you these questions out of nowhe and you say, well, you know, and you almost always have a very good answer

or a resource to which they can turn. And I want to you as a resource in a way here today, Toby, because I wrote a little bit about the Supreme Court arguments on the bump stock band, which I just

they blew me away. They were so ridiculous from Molena Kagan and even Brett Kavanaugh didn't understand as they were looking at the nineteen thirty four Firearms Act to see whether or not the nineteen thirty four Firearms Act, which was attacks on machine guns and short bailed shotguns and things like that, a few other things, whether that would apply to the executive order to categorize. So the debate was, well, can it be done to executive order or does it have

to be done through the legislation? Can the ATF do it? Or can does Congress have to do it? Neither of which would be constitutional. And then not even mentioning that the nineteen thirty four Firearms Act wasn't an outright ban,

it was a tax. It was an excise tax, which is the only thing that's provided for by the Constitution, but then not even going deeper than that, which is, if you actually take it logically, and this is my presupposition here, any requirement that the government tells you you must abide by this in order to exercise your right is an infringement. So if they tell you you've got to pay a tax or you can't buy this thing,

well that's an infringement. I mean, it's a prima fage infringement. They're telling you you can only exercise your right based on the conditions we provide to you. What do you think of what you saw? And then, you know, feel free to comment on any of the things that I brought up. You know about this amazingly fatuous line of argumentation from some of the Supreme

Court justices. Yeah, I think your points are very perceptive. Guard I think that ironically, the one right that is enumerated that says shall not be infringed is the one that gets infringements to a degree that we would not tolerate for any other right that is enumerated. We don't have a license for free speech, for choosing what church we want to go to. I hope I'm

not giving them any ideas here. Well, they already have the SCC for broadcast licensing, so let's stop it at that, right, Yeah, exactly, and so but for an individual to participate, and you know, it's interesting because people think that a that some well I shouldn't say people. I think they're more savvy to this than than those that become elected officials, who become drunk with power, think that they are the grant or of rights and

they are not. That's really what our declaration acknowledges is the fact that these truths are self evident. If you're paying attention, we understand these don't come from man. You know that all men are created equal and are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights. You can't take them away, you can't put conditions or leans on them. That's what inalienable means. But let's get back to the subject matter at hand. The Supreme Court. I was a

little disappointed in the direction this whole thing took. Maybe it's the direction it needed to go, but really I thought the more important question was do bureaucracies, unelected officials, not lawmakers, have the authority to change the rules as you go and so if you know, for two and a half administrations we had bumps were legal. They came with an ATF letterhead that said, Yep, this is not a machine gun. That is the way it was under

the Bush administration. That's the way it was under the Obama administration, and halfway through the Trump administration. It's an accessory. It was just an accessory. Yes, they acknowledged. It doesn't change a thing to the firearm. You put this stock on. It helps you hold your finger straight and still while the recoil of the gun bounces back and forth against your trigger finger.

All it does is makes you pull the trigger faster. That's it. It's one trigger, pull, one shot, and they're just the it shows. I think it's a mark of their dishonesty as they continue to try to fudge the lines. For anybody who takes even u sintil of a second to think about the way that the trigger works and the way the bump stock works, that should be a red flag to anybody listening to them. Yeah, and I think the more dangerous part of the equation is the fact that the bureaucracy

it was it. Sorry, I'm just having someone shut the door. The shops getting a little loud out there. Oh no, you might have. You might have noticed the uh so you got the shots coming through. That's great because you're right there in the range and I'm showing shots right now of of your uh your site. I got it down to that range. You probably saw that. It was funny because I clicked on some stuff and everything flashed up on me. You might have seen my face like, WHOA,

You've got a great site. So yeah. So the more dangerous part of the equation here that I didn't hear them discuss is whether or not these three letter agency because this can be extrapolated not just from the ATF. We've seen it happen with E PA, We've seen it happen with I R. S, We've seen it happen with h FBI. A lot of three letter enforcement

agencies have have changed the way that they interpret things. And ironically, maybe the reason they didn't talk about that is because there's a case before the Supreme Court called Loper Bright, and it's basically a phishing company who challenged Chevron deference, which is basically what has given the power to these bureaucracies to have broad interpretation of law that is passed by Congress. So Congress passes a law,

it's kind of ambiguous. Then they turn to these three letter agencies and say, go enforce the law. And well, it doesn't say every scenario that I have to rule on because the Congress isn't that savvy or doesn't get that granular. So they've been given wide powers to enforce the law. And the Loper Bright case is really interesting because this is how far they will take it.

They it was a fishing boat that the EPA said or whatever it was, the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife said, we need to know that you're not overfishing the stocks, so we need to have an observer on board the boat. And by the way, you need to foot the bill for the absorber observer. You know, you got to pay his salary, which means you can have one less fisherman on the boat because you're only limited to how

many people you can have on the boat. And you also got to pay the per diem you know, costs for the day and eight hundred dollars or so. Yeah. Yeah, And so the fishing companies are like, what, you know, you gave us a regulation to follow, We're following it. It's up to you to go investigate if you think I'm breaking the law, but don't make me pay for my own investigation like that ridiculous. That's

and you know, joby. When I first went to work at MRCTV for you know, under contract with them, I think one of the first articles I wrote was about those fishing fishing counters because when I was when I saw the peace and I proposed it, I saw it, thought, oh, there's machine, and then I looked into it. This is years ago. Then I looked into it, and that was just their first standard that they

had imposed on the fishermen, especially around New England. They were the ones who were protesting it very strongly, especially Massachusetts guys, and they were saying, look, you are telling us literally that we have to take a human being from the federal government and house him on our boat. Because sometimes these guys are out overnight doing fishing. So this is like the housing of troops,

the quartering of troops. Are federal agents in your private property, and they've got to give them a bunk with the fishermen, and they've got to Now the next standard, as you say, the next standard that came out of that is, they changed it to say, well, originally the US government would pay for those fish counters who literally are standing there counting the fish. Right, as if the fishermen don't have an incentive not to overfish.

Right, if they would allow for private property claims over regions and where the fish swim, they could handle it much better. But the government is taking control even though there's nothing in the constitution that allows them to take that control.

They have to amend their constitution. But they've done it, and now they're expanding it, as you say, under the Chevron deference, going back to this other Supreme Court, the Chevron case, where they say, well, we allow the agencies within certain parameters to imagine the scenarios under which they would be okay to operate based on the legislation passed by the Congress to create this bureaucracy like the EPA or the Fisheries or whatever, and the ones that

go a little too far, well then we'll stop those. So this is a question, is it a little too far to now make the fishermen pay for their own monitors that come on there and tell them, no, you can't do this for their own oppression. They're already paying taxes. Now they're got to pay more. And this is what is up in this case. And you know so much about these things that you've opened up a whole nother line has You know, it's only tangentially connected to the the ATF, and

it's regulatory claims to power and things like that in the bump stocks. But it's the same mindset, right, And you know, I say a lot, so back up a little bit. I was a little disheartened to hear

that that isn't the direction that this took. It went more into the nuance of what a machine gun is, which is important because the Supreme Court, if they are able to like Kate you mentioned Kagan, she had a whole line of questioning and basically said, I am a textualist, but the big butt comes out and says the end result is really we got to use common sense. Whenever you hear common sense, it should set off alarm bells everywhere.

But we got to look at the common sense of you know, what the intent of the shooter is. And I'm like, wait a minute here. If you're looking at intent of the shooter, you got guys like Jerry Mitchellik that set world records for the how fast they can pull the trigger. The intent of him is to fire at a high rate of fire for world record reasons and for competition and for fun and everything else. So are we

going to start regulating people's fingers? Are we going to ban are we going to ban rubber bands that might build up some trigger strength and make it so you can pull the trigger faster? Along those lines, Guard, there's a guy he's passed away now. His name was Bob Munden. Look up his

videos sometimes it's the fastest gun in the West or whatever. He was a exhibition shooter, but he could literally shoot a single action gun where you have to cock the hammer and then pull the trigger like the old Western cowboys. He could fire two shots that sounded like one. And if it wasn't for

high speed cameras in super slow motion, you wouldn't believe it. So, you know, are we going to ban guys like Bob Munden from being able to do exhibition shooting because the intent of the shooter is to shoot really, really really fast. It doesn't make sense. I think if if the Supreme Court is going to rule on a case based on intention instead of what the

actual statute says, we have a big problem. This is a slippery slope where you could now say gun oil is a modification to a firearm that allows the shooter to shoot quicker because the bolt isn't all gummed up. You're able to you know, lub it and get it to shoot faster. I mean, where does that end. That's a very fright slope. You know,

you're right. I mean, they it could even go into the shape of the stocks, the type of barrel that you have, so many different types of things that people get for their own comfort, uh, their you know, government subjective. We will decide what is or is not too much of an improvement, you know, up to them. Uh, they could, they could outright ban all sorts of things. And it is it is amazing to me for these people to be even arguing about what type of firearm that

they're told they're not supposed to touch. Uh, they're going to touch. You know, They're they're already assuming what was supposed to be a negative. They're assuming it as a positive. As you said, it is the most infringed upon and it is the most explicitly forbidden thing to infringe. The Second Amendment is is very clear. The first Amendment delineates Congress Congress shall pass no

law on religion or freedom of speech or of the press. There there were religious codes on the books in states, as much as I might not have wanted them. There were curfews in states. There were religious sponsored schools and states right up until the turn of the nineteenth into the twentieth century. In fact, Maine has in its statutes that it can fund religious schools. New

Hampshire in its constitution says New Hampshire State can give gifts to seminaries. So there's no separation on the state level or the local level on that level. But the second Amendment is very very clear there is it shall not be infringed by any level of the state of the police, because that is a threat

to you. They are pointing government guns at you. And you know, I often argue anybody who says, oh, I you're opposed to gun violence, Oh yes, absolutely so, then you want to disarm police officers. You don't want an armed armed government. You oppose so called gun gun confiscation or gun control laws. Oh no, I'm in favor of gun control laws. Well, then you're in favor of threats of go on violence by the state. That's very clear. I mean, it's it's absurd. That's the

net result of gun control is you want it tipped to one side. You want to disarm populace and an armed government, which we have a rich history of where that all leads. And don't think we want to repeat that.

But you know, we talked earlier about licensure and God, there was a Supreme Court case in nineteen forty three called Murdoch v. Pennsylvania, and if you look it up, the concurring opinion, actually not even the concurring the majority opinion in the actual decision says that you can't tax, you can't sell a license, you can't issue a permit or charge a fee for the enjoyment of any federally protected constitutional right, period. So how is it that they

can have that decision? Because it's interesting when I did an MRCTV video about the arguments and I shot I wrote it on Sunday and then I shot it on Monday, and so they put it out on the Supreme Court. No, I shot it on Tuesday, and they just put it out day before

yesterday. And I went through some of these arguments, you know, the logical syllogism here is very clear that if the government is demanding from you an action on your part otherwise you cannot exercise your right, that's an infringement. So if they're telling you you have to cough up ten percent of the cost of this thing that you're buying to us, otherwise you're going to be breaking

the lawn. We're going to point our government guns at you. In fact, we're already pointing our government guns at you to make you do this. Then that's an infringement. And so how does that comport? How do they continue to put these taxes on things? How do they Why is it that they allow for taxes on things like ammunition or things like that. You know, as a guy who deals with this at Cape Gunwar, what do you I don't understand how they can continue to do these sorts of things. And

in Massachusetts it's becoming even worse. They just keep pushing it. We'll talk about that, but on that tax level, I don't understand. How do they get away with this stuff? Well, they've got away with it for decades, that's how. And they've had lower court decisions like district court and Circuit Court of appeals to have upheld the state laws that imposed such nonsense. And it wasn't really until Heller started at all. Back in two thousand and

eight, we just celebrated the fifteenth anniversary of the Heller decision. And in that decision they defined what an arm was, which was defined based on the Lexa Augraphers of the eighteenth century. And it is any arm that is bearable and useful for offensive or defensive purposes, and that is in common and ordinary use. And so that is the definition of an arm. If you ban it, you're breaking your oath of office and you're passing unconstitutional law. So

that was what started it. The problem was the Court didn't give a clear mandate to the inferior or lower courts about how to rule on this, so it was still the wild wild West. There were very few pro Second Amendment rulings that challenged state and federal law after Heller. There was a couple wins along the way, but there were more defeats than wins. Then came along the Bruin decision back in twenty twenty two, which acknowledged Heller as good law.

It was the way that that decision was written. It was reaffirmed as good law and the basis of the Bruin decision, and basically then the Bruin decision gave clear marching orders to the inferior courts and to the lower courts to basically rule on the text of the Second Amendment. If it isn't in the text, then the burden of proof shifts to the government to prove that there was a historical analog at the time of our ratification of the Second Amendment in

seventeen ninety one. And if they can't prove there was this vast history of the type of ban or the type of infringement that they are proposing or that they have passed, and it has to be contextually appropriate. It has to be the same type of law in the same type of vein of which it was originally written. And it can't be one or two or three municipalities or cities or states that have passed this. It has to be a rich history

overwhelming support for that law that you're trying to propose or uphold. That is what the text, history and tradition means. That was put out in Heller first and now reaffirmed by Bruin, and now the courts have been told by the Supreme Court, this is the way that you must look at all Second Amendment related issues is first in the text, and then you can look to the historical analogs and traditions at the time of the ratification. And if you

can't find anything, guess what, it's unconstitutional. And that's where all So the gun grabbers right now are in full bore linear panic mode. They know that their time is short and they have to just throw everything at it and

hope it sticks. And that's what they're doing. You see states like New York, you see states like Massachusetts where I'm from, where they're all just throwing it against the wall it sticks, knowing the sands of time on their gun control schemes is running out, and they are eventually going to have to figure out how to deal with criminals and figure out how to deal with violent crime if they truly want to make our streets safer, which they don't,

but if they did, that's the direction they would take instead of requiring lawful

people to give up their arms. So the point I'm trying to make in all of this is there's been a little bit of a shift, So you know, you ask how they've got away with it because in places like Massachusetts, the district court and the first Circuit Court of Appeals is very anti gun, and most gun control challenges died at the district court level, some got appealed to the first Circuit where they died, and then when it went to

the Supreme Court, it didn't wasn't granted cerciori. So we had a case called Warman v. Heally, which was a challenge to our assault weapons ban that did make it all the way to the Supreme Court and it wasn't granted cert So the problem is hundreds of thousands of dollars and years and years and years and decades of time man hours were spent getting it there, and then

it wasn't granted a hearing. So that was pre bruin. And you know, I've heard arguments on that as to the pro gun justices allowed it to die because they didn't think they had the votes prior to the three new justices that were you know, appointed and affirmed or nominally, they pulled a tactic to say, oh, we'll keep it out until maybe there's a change and then maybe on appeal or there'll be a new version of a similar and we'll

have a more conservative set of justices here. Yeah, Roberts is the swing voter right now, he doesn't No one really knows where he's going. Even in this latest Cargill the bump stock case. You don't really know where Roberts is gonna come down. And I was gonna say, God, bless, bless uh mister Cargill. Uh, you know it's uh, it's uh. I mean, what's his name? Who's the guy from Texas who runs the runs that facility. It's not uh, I can't remember his name. I've

seen him on I've seen him on Radio two. And you know, the courage of these people to spend this money. I was gonna say, do you think that in some cases legislators or you know, even some of these regulators, Toby, and in your experience, let me show you the website. Everybody, it's Cape Gunworks. If you're in Massachusetts, New England, check it out. Uh, it's very very cool. And I'm showing right now your rapid Fire program. Let's mention rapid Fire as you say, go

Live Tuesday with with Grace Curley on two Way Tuesday. But you've got rapid Fire your own show tell people about how they can find you. Yeah, thank you. Guard to go to rapid Fire Radio US or Cape Gunworks and click on rapid Fire and you can find our show. We go live. If you want to hear it live, you can sign up to be notified whenever we go live. Just you just got to like and subscribe on social media and hit the alert buttons and you'll be up up to date on that.

But we go live consistently every Wednesday from four to six pm. It is a live show. You can call in or interact with me on the chat and ask questions. We do Q and A. We also talk about all the news of the week and around the Second Amendment, and we archive the show. So if you go to YouTube or whatever platform you like, Rumble, we're all over Rumble, which is good. Yeah, and so

they're great. Yeah, they're awesome. And we haven't been deplatformed from Rumble yet, but we've been put in time out by all the other typical big tech and right now our Facebook account is completely down. So it's amazing thing. You know, I used to get deplatformed for holding a gun and talking about it, and now it's just talking about it. You talk about guns get put in time. Wow, it's a wow. And there's there there are so many people who are interested in getting these tips. It's just amazing

to me. And uh, you know, oh and it was a Michael Cargill, Uh from Austin, Texas, Michael Cargill. And and let me ask you, Toby the do you think that some of these people do it just out of spite? You know, we've got we've got a Trump he responded with the bumpstock thing. Because there was this fear generated and so on, he should not have done it. It was very very clear. You know, some people think that maybe it was part of a larger plan to

introduce even more government regulations on accessories and parts and things like that. You know, whether they want to ascribe those those asinine motives of Trump or the dark motives of Trump, who knows. But either way, on the state legislative side, many of these legislators must know that when they're proposing these new ideas, and we'll go through a couple of the things that you're battling in Massachusetts, they must know that under the Bruins standard, those aren't going to

stick. And one of the things that you and I've discussed before is that under the Heller decision. One of the big problems there, and you and I have both spoken with Tony Heller about this. The problem has been that the antonin Scalia decision had at the bottom of it, well, of course

we know that no rights are not unattenuable. No right is absolute, as he said, and there's actually audio of him saying that, And we found out that there was some wheeling and dealing there so he could get the vote on the Heller decision to say, Okay, I will go with you antonin Scalia if you add that line in that no right is absolute. But that's the that's the principle of rights. That's the point. They are supposed to be absolute against the state. The state is not supposed to touch our rights.

That's the point. So that's why they called rights. And it's amazing to see how with the Bruin standard there is this extra bulwark. But it seems like these people are aware of this extra bulwark now and they're just trying to take more of your time. In some cases they're doing it I think just because they don't like you. Well, I think there's a little bit of a problem here. With the Congress that makes law, whether it's a

state legislature or the federal government. And that is they don't understand constitutional limitations. That is something that they've really got way off track on. Like I said, it become drunk with power to the extent that they think everything is on the table for them to deal with. And in Madison and the architect of the Constitution, wrote in the Federalist Papers number forty nine that this is where the whole concept of constitutional limitations takes place, and he explains that there

are limits to the power of Congress. And in fact, the wording in this is so brilliantly written I don't have it up on the screen, but he actually says that the Congress, the legislature comes from the blood of the people. It's the people that they live with, that they work with, it, they farm with, that they do business with, go to the state House or go to Capitol Hill, and they are the gatekeeper of our

rights. And now the script has flipped, the coin has been tossed to the other side where they think that they are the grantor of rights, where the original intent of Congress was to maintain and defend our rights and Unfortunately, now they see the you know, like we can pick off little parts of it here and there, we can change the law. So you bring up

an excellent point guard about this, and what do they think. I was able to have a meeting at my shop with two state senators and I did a big dog and pony show, told them about what gun owners go through, what hoops we have to jump through just to exercise our right to keep in bare arms in the state of Massachusetts. Then I finally said to them, I said, listen, if you could get the votes and you could pass a bill in the House on both sides, the Reps and the Senators,

and say that we want to ban Catholics. If you had the votes, you had the numbers to pass it, can you do that? They both kind of looked at each other and said, no, we can't do that. So that is the first acknowledgment of constitutional limitations. And I was trying to show them the parallel and I said, look, you just acknowledged you don't have the constitutional authority to ban Catholics, but yet that's exactly what

you're doing to guns. That's exactly what you're doing with the Second Amendment. And then they go, well, well, well you know, and then start the whole No right is absolute and we can walk in chew gum at the same time and all this stuff that you hear them spout off. I said, no, it is the same, because we have been told that every gun infringement isn't a infringement on our constitutionally protected rights because you have other

options. You just can't have that gun. You can have that gun if you want a shotgun, if you want a bolt action rifle, if you want a non high capacity semi automatic rifle, you can have that. You know that you have choices. We're not restricting your right to keeping barrams because you have other choices. Well, I want to be a Catholic or fill in the blank. And if you pass a law saying I can't guess what you just acknowledged, you can't do that, you're infringing on my right.

And now that's exactly what you're doing to the Second Amendment. And you're saying it's not happening. You're saying you're not infringing upon my constitutionally protected rights. But oh you are, yeah, and it isn't an interesting we're speaking with Toby Leary of Cape gun Works folks, and of course follow Toby at Cape gun Works on Twitter, slash x, go to the Cape Gunworks website.

Isn't it interesting Toby as well? Because it's this I think the first sign of trouble is that they are going to lay down their definitions of words. You know. It's like that Lewis Carroll thing from Alice through the Looking Glass whom she meets Humpty Dumpty, and he is basically cipher for a monarch, and she says, wow, you can make words mean so many different things. In other words, you know, is propaganda? And he says, oh, She goes, how do you do that? He goes, well,

essentially, he says, it's no special skill. It just depends who's in control, you know. And so even when we look at things like the Bruins second tier standard, and you and I have discussed this a little bit before, that leaves ambiguity for the politicians to say, well, we will define what was common. Right now, you could have enough pressure on

people to say, look, you're being completely absurd and fatuous here. It's understandable what is common, But the very audacity, the usurpation of them to define for you, the parameters under which they can attack you. That's a problem. You know. You bring up a great point because the after Heller, the what makes it common and ordinary is the gun that the people want. It has nothing to do with what government's definition of common and ordinary is.

I mean, the Supreme Court did sort of define that in the Kaetano case, another Massachusetts case that we talked about stun guns, and they said, there are twenty thousand stun guns in common use in America, so therefore they are in They're in use or they're owned in America, so therefore they are in common in ordinary use a number of say twenty thousand, So that was enough to meet the definition of common in ordinary use for the Supreme Court.

And you look at something like the AR fifteen, which is the gun that everybody loves to hate, and there's roughly thirty to forty million of them in use in America each and every day, and so I think that meets the twenty thousand threshold. You know. But the boss line is it is

the gun that the people want. And guess what gun that is. It's the gun that causes tyrants to question whether they should overstep their roles and violate their oath of office, and that is the one that makes tyrants nervous, so therefore they want to take it off the table. Well, the problem is, that's the whole point of the Second Amendment. It is the tyrant relief valve. And you can't keep tyrants in check with your single shotguns,

although I bet you could if enough people owned and possess them. But the point is it has to be equal to what government has, and if it isn't, then you're missing the point. So right, yeah, and you know, Toby, just to wrap it up, I want to ask you

real quick, but before I do that, ask you this question. I just want to mention some people might be familiar that in the nineteen nineties there was a new standard that was brought about in judicial tortious claim parlace called the Dowber hearing on class action suits, and it had to do with the introduction

of expert witnesses for scientific background on various products or something like that. Previously, all they had was the judge would just determine, do you have an expert witness with enough credentials that we will allow this person in to be a witness for the plaintiffs or the defense in a tortious claim hearing torti's you know,

liability suit. Then they changed it based on this Dalbert judge Dalbert who came up with this new standard that the judge would not only determine whether the credentials were sufficient to allow this person into the court, which I think is already an arbitrary standard that is, you know, dependent on the judge, but also whether what the person was going to say was within quote, the

scientific consensus. And this goes to the common usage or the popular the popular thing or common use of the time sort of thing that leaves massive amounts of wiggle room for any person within a courtroom or any legislator to say, well, we're saying this is common. We're saying this is uncommon. So something

new under the Dalbert hearing. So, for example, the Dow Corning silicone breast implant lawsuits that were coming around in the nineteen nineties, they had information that silicone was an adjuvant that caused women problems like lupus, but it wasn't well known at the time, so it wasn't the scientific consensus. It was

new science that was revealing truth. But it had not been established long enough, they would have allowed the judge to block all of that scientific information, including information that Dow Corning knew in the sixties that it was an adjuvant that caught autoimmune problems. So there's a great example of something new which is totally viable and people should have the opportunity to find out about it in court or in the marketplace. Some new development of a firearm, Well it's not in

common use, so we can get rid of it. You know, these are these are always these areas where you say to yourself, why did you put that in there? Why don't you just go with shall not be infringed? It's a right I recognize at prima fasher and we're done. We can go home and have lunch. You know, I don't get it. Tell tell us one real quick thing about what you're looking at in Massachusetts too,

because I know you know you're at you're at work right now. So thank you so much again for joining you know, the David Night Show as I as I get to host it today too, of course. Yeah, so right now in Massachusetts, we have two bills, well it's really one bill. It's the House Bill H four one three nine, which passed last November, and then the Senate passed an amendment to it called S twenty five eighty

four, and both iterations these have had multiple numbers. It started life out as h House Docket forty four to twenty, and there were signs everywhere, you know, stop HD forty four to twenty, and so it hasn't really morphed into the newest and latest number for signs and whatnot and for conversation purposes.

But the bottom line is it's a really comprehensive gun omnibus gun control bill that will severely restrict the right to keep in bare arms further than it already is in the state of Massachusetts. And interestingly enough, it is not going to do a dang thing about putting violent criminals in jail for long periods of time. All it does is level the sites of government guns at peaceful citizens if they don't comply with the new laws that are completely and utterly unconstitutional should

they pass. So the two versions that have passed are vastly different versions. The House has completely rejected the Senate's version, so therefore they are going to come together in a conference committee. And the conference committee has been seated. There are three Senators and three reps that will now go behind closed doors and hash out the details of what the final version of the bill will be. There's no public input, there's no hearings. There's not even any other members

of Congress that can go into these meetings. It is completely closed door, and they will come out and a merge with a bill that'll get an up or down vote, and then it'll go to the desk of Marahely. So you know, our rights are under full attack right now, and they don't

acknowledge that these laws are unconstitutional. When I met with the senators that I met with, they think they're within their legal capacity or the oath of office to continue to further infringe peaceful, lawful citizens right to keep in bear arms. And I hope I gave them some food to think about, some things to think about. The good news is this is an election year. We have two massive issues that everybody hasks the campaign on, and one is them

taking away our right to keeping bear arms by voting for this nonsense. And two is the illegal immigration crisis that is affecting just about every state in the Union now. But it's really it's costing Massachusetts billions of dollars, and we are a right to shelter state and I'm not trying to go down a tangent

on that. But on the other hand, those are the two big issues that if people want to get activated and call their congressman and call their state senator and say, hey, I'm not going to vote for you, and I'll campaign against whoever primaries against you, or I'll support whoever primaries against you, and then I'll ultimately campaign for the person that opposes you on the general

election. That would be a great place to start because they're all nervous about getting their job back in November. So I think that gives us a little bit of meat on the bone to go after. And you know, at the end of the day, they don't care about your rights. Guard they care about getting re elected. So that's so true. It's so true. And it's good that you you know, you're out there in the media and

you take this time. You've taken the time to talk to us, You speak with grace, and you take calls from people who are concerned about this. And if this legislation in Massachusetts does pass, then it would restrict a large number of that you could sell. Likely you're still waiting for the committee to come out with its final version. Do you think, I know that earlier they had a portion of it that would have basically made it impossible for

teenagers to train in firearms. Do you think that's going to be part of the fire final legislation as well? I don't know. It's it's really hard to say because the House is pretty much digging their heels in and sticking. You know, they're saying, our version is the version the Senate tried to make it a little better, if you will, or at least acknowledged that

this is ridiculous. A lot of it is ridiculous, and tried to get at the things that they actually want to pass, like the unfinished frame and receivers. They want to ban those and make it illegal for people who enjoy the hobby of building firearms in their home. They want to they want to do away with that. They want to they want to further restrict semi automatic rifles. So I think it's just a waste of breath to sit here and

postulate on what the heck they could come out with. But whatever version of it is, it's not going to be good, and I'm really hoping that they just can't get along to the point where they run out of time. You know, July thirty first is the end of the congressional session. However, they've seated the Congressional Committee here and it's the first week of March,

so I highly doubt that they're going to run out of time. And you know, if I can back up on this whole thing, the bill that was originally introduced in July HD forty four to twenty by Michael Day of Stoneham, he introduced a bill that was the wish list of the Giffords, every

town, Brady Bloomberg, you know, Mayor's for whatever. It was a conglomerate wish list of Hey, if you make me a top twenty list of what you would like to see happen, and as it pertains, the gun control, send me the list along with your check for my reelection, and that is what I'm going to put in. And that is exactly what happened. You know, there's a picture of Michael Day arm and arm with Gabby Gifford's you know, I'm sure she was hand delivering the reelection check and to

his war chest and then hand delivered this pre written bill. In my opinion, I don't have empirical evidence to this, But the only thing that leads me to believe that's the case is because when I called their offices and said, do you realize what's in this? They had no clue. They didn't know what was in it. So I know they didn't write it, and I know it was the wish list of the anti gun movement, and that's exactly what they've implemented. So if you want to see your rights eroded in

an unconstitutional fashion, focus your sites on Massachusetts and what's going on. You can go to goal dot org, g o A L dot org. They have done a full breakdown of it, and my hat's off to them because I wouldn't have got through it the way they did. But they've they kind

of bullet point all the major problems with these bills with this bill. So the good news is I have I have a sneaky suspicion we'll have a Supreme Court ruling in June that'll affect a couple of areas of this bill, so they might have to go back to the drawing board before it's even fully you know, voted on and signed into law. I hope they would do that at the integrity to do that, uh, and not just pass it anyway and say screw you guys. Challenge it. But that's generally the mo so

my hopes aren't too high on that. But anyway, that's what we've been doing with shining the light of truth on the on the dirty dealings of our elected officials who think that our rights are something that they can take away, which they can. And you know, it's remarkable because they they force you and other people to have to expend so much time to try to battle these

things. But in a way, you know, if we can look at the positive of it, you are one of the best educated guys on this, on the courts, on the rulings, on the guns, the firearms, the history, and so in a way it's it's you. You can find a positive in that you are educating people. You're you're taking that time and getting the information out to the next generations, to people who maybe they'll come across your show, maybe they'll hear you on the radio, and they'll

get that knowledge that they didn't have before. So because of the friction that they cause, you you allow for the You know, you radiate this heat of information out to people. You know it might sound like a platitude, but you know, I think it is admirable what you do. I appreciate that. And you know you just in closing, you bring up a great point. Without the infringement, we don't have the victory. So you know, if it wasn't for District of Columbia banning handguns, we wouldn't have DC

Verus Heller. Yeah, if it wasn't for State of New York making some shall issue I mean may issue licensing scheme, we wouldn't have Bruins. So there's I And after the Brewin decision came down, I said, I predicted exactly what's happening in Massachusetts. I said it's gonna get worse before it gets better. And that's I still feel that way. Well, Toby, thank you so much. It's great to see you. I want to show the website one more time and show your smile and face there in front of the

golden mic the old almost like the old EIB microphone. And I'm mad at my producer for buying this microphone on you know that way, I'm like, who do you think I am? I don't deserve a golden microphone. I've been at this for two years. I do a once a week podcast. I said, but anyway, that's good, it's good. I mean you could go with copper. Copper rounds are lad, but I don't think that would work. It'd be too insulating. The gold all the way, man,

all the way. It is classic. It's great stuff. And Toby thanks again. And I hope people check out rapid fire again. They can. They can check out Capegunworks dot com to find out more and then follow you on Twitter. It's at Capegunworks right man, Yes, sir, thank you very much. Guard. I appreciate your time. You are the man. And again I hope I can get down there to see you very soon.

Man, I'm gonna be uh gonna be interested in maybe making a purchase, but definitely going onto the onto the range and fund fund some advice from you. Okay, that'd be great, Come on down any all right, Thanks, jobey great, we'll talk to you soon. Thank you for the time. Appreciate it. Boy Tooby, Larry good good Man like him a lot, and of course go to Capegunworks dot com everybody to find out what

he does. He is a decent, decent man, and if you get the opportunity check out his show, I think you'll really enjoy what he does. And you can find all the old versions of the show at the website, So definitely take the opportunity. You know, I want to show you a little something from the Governor of New York before we bring in our next guest, Gerald Silente, at eleven o'clock. And you'll see over on my

Twitter feed that I made a comment about this. So here it is this from yesterday, and I discussed this on my program yesterday because it does have to do with safety. The state of New York trying to block people's ability to defend themselves and what is called the tragedy of the commons, where the government claims control of something, in this case the subway system in New York City, whether it's a public street or the subway system. This is a

public place. People's tax money is used for it. They have the right to self defense. And of course Kathy Holkl has said she is declaring martial law by sending one thousand. This is Joe Haas dementia, no kidding, that's his site. So he's saying she's declaring martial law. But essentially what she's doing is she is going to send a thousand National Guardsmen to patrol the

crime ridden subway. So here's what she had to say. I've got a shorter clip of it, but I want to show you the full clip of the guard seconds to conduct point point one, I'm redeploying nearly one thousand members of the New York State Police, MTA Police an MTA National Guard to conduct

big checks in the city's busiest transit. So they'll start seeing them at the tables, making sure that weapons are not being brought in, working in concert with our New York State Police as well as our NYPD, because no one heading to their job, or to visit family or go to a doctor appointment should worry that the person sitting next to them possesses a deadly weapon. Point of course, they are members of the organized government, thuggish police force that

is going to infringe on your rights. So I brought up a little something. People who are familiar with the problems of the central government running the so called immigration system, although the word immigration is not in the US Constitution, especially if they live in New Mexico or Arizona. They might be familiar with these public places where their rights have been infringed, otherwise known as border checkpoints.

I need to answer my immigration question. I didn't go out of country, sure under I n A two seven eight three and Supreme Court US versus Martinez his ammigration checkpointer. I didn't know. I didn't leave the country to establish if you're a citizens. But I didn't leave the country. I know, but this ammigration checkwin. I need you to answer my immigration That's fine. I need to be satisfied. Oh, thank you to you a citizen. I'm just traveling on this road, so it's a simple question. Certain.

I don't answer questions, and of course they pull them aside. They pulled people out of the cars. And I read last night on my Liberty Conspiracy program, which of course you can listen to watch Monday through Friday at six o'clock on Rumble Rockfinn and on my Twitter feed that is x feed at guard Goldsmith. I mentioned this from the Future Freedom Foundation's president, Jacob Hornberger, the tyranny of domestic highway checkpoints. This is all based on a complete

usurpation of your rights to be able to control your earnings. They will take your earnings, build roads and say, see, we did this for you. You must conform to what we're telling you. The imposition of Kathy Hulk inside the subway system is no different than the folks at the TSA who are in your airports. They're supposed to be state or municipal airports. The federal government's not supposed to have anything to do with it. They started the FAA

back in the nineteen twenties as part of the United States postal system. They had lighted air routes before radar, and they blocked off air routes to commercial flyers so that the US Postal Service could fly. And they claimed that they were similar to post roads, that the Constitution allows the federal government to create

the post roads. Right well. From there, of course, with different federal handouts to specially favored mayors or governors, people like Illinois governor or Chicago mayor, they would start to hand out money for the building of airports. The FAA grew, and by the way, as I mentioned, if you want to see the vestige of the orige origins of the US postal lighted air

routes postal roots, if you're flying over areas in the southwest. You can still see in the daytime they had giant concrete arrows for they didn't have radar, and at night they had giant light towers, some of which I could still see when I was a kid. You could see them going east, west, north, south, that sort of thing, so the pilots would

follow those from there they expanded. There's nothing in the Constitution that truly allows, in any pure reading of the Interstate Commerce Clause, the politicians to say that because a plane flies over state borders, the government can regulate it. The Interstate Commerce Clause was originally written in order to allow for some sort of remedy between state on state trade disputes states with capital s's the governments, not

people putting things that they want to sell over state borders for sale. But they have misconstrued it, of course, contrary to even what James Madison said. He said it was a remedial measure, not a priori measure allowing the government or ex ante allowing the government to regulate anything that they want and tell people what they've got to do in order to engage in free commerce, freedom

of association. There should be no tsa it's a breach of the Fourth Amendment on a daily regular basis, and hocals move in New York and the subway is the same thing. Now, some people might think it provides great security. This goes deeper into the philosophy therefore, of the tragedy of the Commons, because anything the government runs is going to pit people against each other, and it just causes dissension and fraying of people's nerves and argumentation. The government

is not a positive. It's not the great uniter, it's the great forcer. So I think that that's important to remember, especially when we look at the infringement of the Worth Amendment in some of those states and the borders where even in the Constitution the word immigration does not appear. As I've mentioned previously on David Knight's show here and on my program, and you can look it up, it was an eighteen seventy five Supreme Court ruling that basically created out

of nowhere the congressional power to control immigration. Up to that point, it was a state issue. Thomas Jefferson mentioned it in the fourth Kentucky Resolution,

and James Madison mentioned it in the Virginia Resolves. It's very important that people keep this stuff in mind, because if they call themselves, say conservative constitutionalists, at least try to be consistent, at least have a conversation about these things, because your adoration of central command and control is getting you what you want, either for so called gun control or security in the subways or your roads, or your ability to control the border. Look who's in charge of

it. Now, let's take the opportunity to hear a little bit from our next guest. I want to let you know a little bit more about the David Knight Show and where you can find it, and then we'll be right back with Gerald Solente on the David Knight Program. If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis in the news, they say the you'll love the Classic Hits channel at AVS Radio, download our app or listen now at APS radio dot com. Everybody you making sense? Common again, Jord

listening to the David Knight Show. Oh again, wonderful stuff. And now let's hear from a wonderful man. He is Gerald Celente and he is joining us from Kingston, New York. Gerald, Welcome to the David Knight Show. As I get to fill in Thank you so much, really appreciate you being here, of course, coming from the headquarters of the Trends Journal. Welcome to the show on happy Friday. Thank you. It's not a happy

Friday, it's I'm so sad to see you. You're not rolling in the splendor of the state of the Onion address or is it a little too stinky? Ah, you know, it's just a lot of more crap. You know. I'm so heart broken to see the decline of this country. You know, I just listening to you know, I'm a real jazz fan, you know, but you know, going back from rag time to swing to

right. I remember we got to talk a little bit about that because my dad, he brought me up with that, listening to Gene Group on the drums and great stuff, and you know, and I'm listening to some you know, uh Southern music, you know, the hillbilly music and stuff, and the spirit of America was so high and everybody's having a good time and laughing. You know. Yeah, things are tough, but you went out

and had a good time. And now there's no good times. I'm up here in the Hudson Valley, how about Death Valley, there's no nightlife anymore. I mean, everything is a drag. And it's such a beautiful area too, it could be so vibrant, but every everybody's opportunities have been crushed through so many vectors. It's ridiculous. Again. They've they've sucked a joy out of life. And you talked about the you know, the moronic speech. Yes, of course I didn't you know it. Oh he was on

fire. Wait, a little goddamn clown, a little boy of nothing, a little little jerk, one after another. I can't stand either of them. I want to make this really clear. You know, I'm a political atheist. I don't believe in the in the quote system. I was the assistant to the secretary of the New York States Senate. I ran major political

campaigns in Westchester County, the richest county in America. I designed and instructed American politics and campaign technology, how to run how to run political campaigns. Tought it at Saint John's University. I've been in the system there. I got out. It was a freak show. Little boys and girls that bend over and suck up to get their way up, little bunch of nobodies, And that's what this country has become I'm little Andy Cuomo. I'm a daddy's

boy of nothing, born on third base. Thought I hit her home run like little slime ball Georgie Bush, little too dope up there in Canada. Shut down your business stand six zeet apart. Only ten people are allowed to come in your house, Hail Hitler, Yes sir, And then they and then they've got the audacity to talk about freedom. You know. Trudeau did it just again a couple times this week, and Biden did it last night right off the bat, trying to conflate the United States, perpetuating that meat

grinder in Ukraine to somehow, somehow, Gerald, freedom amazing. By the way, Gerald, I want to mention before were going on any further. I know that I mentioned uh about you know, chatting for a half hour, but if you can stay longer, I would love it, you know, because I wasn't sure how long you want to go, so you only

do a half hour? Okay, sounds good, It sounds good. Let's let's discuss a couple of the things as we compare Joe Biden claiming the economy is doing great and of course violent crime is down, completely contrary to reality. Over a Trend's Journal. I want to show some folks, uh, what you've got here, and you've got some very important things. For example, the trend about the ev that is an excellent, excellent piece and how

soon until banks can offer crypto custody services to clients. Plus of course what you have you have a very good piece about a couple banks recently that are dealing with business properties and they are in a lot of trouble. So take your pick to tell us what you would like to really flag for people to watch. And they can find this at the Trends Journal. And of course if they use David Nightcode David Night Show, they get ten percent off.

If I'm not mistaken, Yeah, that's true, and it's again it's only it goes by two dollars and fifty cents a week, allows you cup of coffee, and again look at our top trends. We're going to talk about it. One of our top trends. This is going to be a golden year for gold. Oh yeah, guess what as we go on the air now, gold is what two one hundred and seventy five dollars an ounce. When we wrote this, it was about nineteen hundred, right, yeah,

and another one. We're going to talk about banks go bust when they lock down, and again talking about crime and stupidity. All this money going into the military industrial complex, our country rotting in front of our eyes. The subways in New York is a night in Calcutter, a little clown girl playing a governor in New York again. Men, women, boys, girls, black, white, green, yellow, don't want to hear the crap good in bed comes in everything. This little jerk you got running this hucal Berry.

We're going to send National Guard to the subway system again putting things together. The bank's going bust. Nobody talks about the reason why this crime went up was because of all the years of lockdowns and what we said, when people lose everything and have nothing left to lose, they lose it. Let's go back to the office building bust. You're again. This is the data.

Your office vacancy rate in New York City, meaning nobody in the buildings only about it's twenty two point eight percent, twenty three percent, twenty three percent vacant. Your office occupancy rate in New York City forty nine point seven percent. Wait a minute, you mean only forty nine fifty percent of the people going back, that's right, and you got twenty three percent of the buildings are vacant. Yeah, how about all the businesses that used to depend

on commuters? How the hell with them? Who cares? Again? Now the office building bust, which we warned back in May of twenty twenty in your Trends Journal, we said it's going to be an office building bust that's going to bring down the banking system through you. What are you talking about? You don't know anything. You're not on mainstream media anymore. Used to be on Everybody, Oprah a couple of times, used to be on CNN four times a month. I used to be on everybody, Good Morning America,

to Today's Show, on and on and on and on. We don't want you there because you speak the truth and you won't swallow the crap that they're putting out there. So let's go back to the banking system. Let's say I own I have ten stories in a building. My people don't want to come back to work anymore. After they're staying home week after week, month after month, year after you are sitting in themselves. Holy Chris, I'm getting up at five o'clock in the morning, commute an hour and a

half. I'm not going to do that anymore. I believe I was destroying my life like this, sitting behind a call like this and bumping the bumper traffic. Okay, I got to yea. Listen, stay home. There were cubicles anyway, I'm the boss. I don't see these people. Why do I need all the space? Right right right now? You're going to see the fault rates and you're seeing with this New York banker ready, and

it's one after another. They're about there are about, according to the Federal Reserve, about eighty no excuse me, about sixty banks suffering from strict to faults coming up. Oh boy, they're hardly mentioning this at all. You got to really, really, really do it again. Go to the wall. I can't say the word, but it's s HI with a T in it journal because that's what it is. Now. There's no data on on what what what? Hey? What what was was the German UH Manufacturing Index?

When did it came out? Yes? Oh you mean it was way down again? How about what? No data anymore? No duata anymore? Good point. You look at Gerald, You've got a piece here that I flagged U last night over dinner. I was looking at this and I just want to show it to people on the Trends Journal. This is the headline top trend office building bust from March fifth. Pension funds fund dumps office yep.

And this this is a little bit of what you mentioned. This refers to this, And this is the solid solidity of the information that you provide for people who really want facts on the ground that they can deal with and try to prepare and make some decisions about their money. You know, as you say the Wall Street Journal, it's just it's it's so difficult to even look at it in many cases. So every once in a while they'll have

something, and an editorial is something, But you say here. The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board CPIB was one of the earliest pension funds to put money into commercial real estate, inspiring others around the world to do the same. Now the board has sparked worries that other retirement systems will follow its lead in dumping its holdings in office buildings at deep discount prices. If that trend, if that becomes a trend, it will drive down property values across the sector

even faster than they're falling currently. In one instance, the CPIB Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board sold its interest in a New York City office development project for a dollar, yes, a single dollar, just to escape probable future losses. It sold its share to Boston Properties, another partner in the deal, which also agreed to assume the board's debt from the project. And there's so much more here, But there's something down a little further, you say.

Banks and investment funds around the world have thrown money into office blocks for decades now, many are conceding that a significant portion of those loans may fail. Fortune reported more than one hundred billion dollars in commercial real estate loans are maturing this year, and one point one trillion worldwide will come due before twenty twenty

eight. And then and then, if you go to our economic update that in this week's Trends Journal, we have this is reported that quote the delinquency rate for office buildings in New York City has increased You're ready by more than one thousand percent from January twenty twenty three to January twenty twenty four, according to data from costar one. Thousand percent. Hey, the Taylor Swift have sex last night. I mean, that's the kind of news that is news

that's so we are so frivolous, unbelievable. Wow. Well, you know, Gerald, you've mentioned before your experience at nine to eleven the things that people need in order to be prepared. One of the things before we get to the physical stuff is this information. And I know you've been making great strides, you know, every week your conversations with Judge Napolitano, and you've

been on a lot of programs talking to a lot of people. Are you getting a sense, Gerald Sealente, that you're getting more access to more people recently in a sort of this growing nascent expansion of the independent reporters and people doing podcasts and things like that. Yes, and no, we're getting Shadow Band on YouTube. I get. You see the hate mail I get and people contacting YouTube they're calling me an anti Semite and I hate Jewish people.

Yeah, because you see the cover of this week's Trends Journal. Yeah. Well of course, if you're if you're at all in favor of a ceasefire, then clearly you're anti Semitic. I mean, don't people understand this. I mean, we're all and my last name is Goldsmith. A lot of people think I'm Jewish, and I've mentioned this before on my own programs. Gerald I went to Boston University, right, And I just to let you know what this is like. My roommate for two years was one of the

reporters. His name is Sean Naylor. He's one of the reporters who exposed that the CIA was spying on Julian No Sanjra in the Ecuadorian embassy. So we've always been pretty pro liberty guys. So I've an English Irish name, right. I often mentioned on Saint Patrick's Day, I get in front of a mirror and I yelled at myself for my own rebellion and you know,

British oppression. But they thought I was Jewish, and I would hear things from the Zionist Jewish people, and there were you know, there were other people who were very religiously inclined and so on. But the way that they would describe the Palestinian people, it blew me away. Then they were just like animals. I couldn't believe it. And if I had all criticized them, it was the gaslighting. It was the what are you anti Semitic?

I thought that you were Jewish? Like, what are you talking I'm talking about a political system of oppression that has been growing decade after decade, taking people's land. I thought that was bad when it was done to the Jews in Germany and Poland. What are you talking about? It's just insane And it's this mindset on hyperdrive. Now if you can't say anything, it's nuts. Yes, so again, you know, we say what we say when

nobody. We have no advertisements in the Trend's journal. And again it's only like if you get it from the night, it's only about two dollars and fifty cents a week. So anyway, he asked, Yes, I have a lot of but we're getting the hate mail that I'm getting again. I launched Occupy Peace over a decade ago. I'm not anti American because I hate America's wars. I'm not anti Jewish because I hate Israel's genocide of Palestinians.

And if you look up the definition of genocide, it's exactly what they're doing. And isn't an amazing gerald to see these transparent, these shallow bottom feeders in Washington, D C. And others like Victorian Newland, like people like Joe Biden, or people like Amy Klobashar, or people like Lindsay Graham on

the one hand claiming that they've got to support Israel. At the same time, every one of those people associated and as I mentioned before earlier on the program, with Oli Tiani Bach and the members of the Slovada Party in Ukraine, as they overthrew the elected leader Yanikovich in late twenty thirteen early twenty fourteen and worked with Nazis to put in yatsunyuk and worked with Oli Tanibak and the Slova Dea Party and then allowed for the systematic destruction of tens of thousands of

people in the don Bass region with those not Zazi asoh Battalian people. And they've got the fatuous gall to talk about how they support Jewish people while they're on the other hand hanging out with Nazis and Ukraine. It's it's like, don't you do they ever think that people might notice this stuff? They don't care, Yeah, care about people. But by the way, what you're saying, hardly anybody knows. Here. This is the cover of the Trend's

journal. Going back to twenty fourteen. So happy that guy is. It's about the United States overthrow of the democratically elected government. The Victiannikovich there, mis fachabrut that what's her name there, Janet Yellen? Yeah. Ukraine presented

the perfect opportunity for Washington to advance such monic agenda. In a speech to the National Press called Last December, which was twenty thirteen, Assistant Secretary of State Victorian Neulan boasted that Washington and invested five billion dollars in NGOs, non government at the organizations in Ukraine. You ready to quote teach democracy. I'm stealing five billion dollars of our money to give to the crime syndicates to overthrow

this government. Are you kidding me? To teach democracy? Yeah? Holy smoke, that's what it does. Don't you understand? We attacked the Gerald, we attack Iraq, we attack Afghanistan to bring freedom and democracy. Absolutely, just unbelievable one. And I gotta tell you when marchow I got to bring democracy, It's unbelievable. It's it's you know, I was I was

joking around. I was sitting around about you know, the Barack Obama Dick lug visit to Ukraine and around two thousand and five, two thousand and six, one of the helpments started with some billions that they provided over there, the bioweapons labs that Victoria Neulan admitted to Marco Rubio a couple of years ago, and she said, well, they're by there, their research facilities, and she used the term Ukrainians, but just ridiculous actually finally admitting it.

I was joking around about, you know, Barack Obama at that time going in there and you know, shaving off some money and giving those those guys like Easy Bake Oven for their lab stuff to cook up some of these chemicals. But the thing that really got me was around twenty thirteen, I was reporting on this this coup and a buddy of mine, and I mentioned this on my show, The Liberty Conspiracy Show that I do it in the evenings.

A buddy of mine had worked for the Obama administration under Eric Holder very briefly, and he got out just before Yeah, and I had gone to school with this guy, high school with this guy. You know, we went to punk rock clubs together and stuff like that. He was more on the left wing side. He got out before the fast and furious stuff blew up, and so I knew it was like, oh, you must haven't heard about that. He comes up to me December of twenty thirteen. He

says, hey, guard, where are you got your information? I'm listening to your podcast about Ukraine. We get that information. And I had been sort of tipped off to the United States trying to overthrow Syria and so on

and so forth. You know, So I've been watching this and then when the when the Russians dropped their long term debt debt holdings for the US around two thousand and eight, two thousand and nine, I was like, that was when they started to try to show isolations and try to block Russian energy exports. It was very clear what they were doing, right, And so I said, well, you know, I'm just getting my information and you know, talking about Yanikovich, the false flag of the snipers and stuff.

And he said, well, you're right, and there's a lot more. I said, oh, really, like what and this is December. They haven't you know, they haven't even installed the new government there yet or anything like that. He said, he said, there's a lot more, and it's like like what. So then he paused and I've mentioned to my audience. I don't know whether he was just playing up the drama, but he said, you know, I think I better stop there. I have a

daughter now. So I said, all right, man, whatever you want to do, dude, whatever you want to do. But I'm going to keep reporting on this stuff. And he has decoupled from me. I haven't heard from him since a few months after that. So again, you know, it's a crime syndicate that people call a government. I mean, here, we are kind we got a choice between Nickey Mouse and Donald Duck. I mean, oh, we got only two parties run the whole country.

I mean what, it's a joke. And look at these little boys that you mentioned, little Lindsey Graham, Rubio. These little boys couldn't fight their way out a paper. Big anybody that wants to support a war overseas, go over there and fight. Send your wife, your kids, your transgenders, go over there and fight. Send your money or shut your mouth.

I want my money to stay in America. Occupy Peace, the movement that I launched, one of the major elements of the platform close all the bases Overseas, would have got a over eight hundred and about eighty ninety countries, secure the homeland with the troops, put our money to rebuilding our rotted third world infrastructure. Anybody you want to go to war, let the people vote.

That's those are the platforms again. So going back to enough talking about the war, going back to the economy with Biden eighty excuse me, sixty three percent of the American people are living paycheck to paycheck. The cost excuse me, thirty eight percent of people's income, thirty eight percent is going into the cost for rentals, for rentals. Meanwhile, the biggs keep getting bigger. Going back to immigration, and they could stop it from I mean very

simple. They don't want it to They need more cheap labor. Go to go to go to Walmar. I don't go to any of them, go to well I go to home depot because they need you know, hardware stuff. Uh. And again they used to have when I was a young guy, they had hardware stores, stationary stores, drug stores, grocery stores. You know. Now now it's stationary chains, drug chains, grocery chains,

hardware chains, they're all chains. Go to any of them. Help wanted, help wanted, help wanted because they pay the plantation workers of slave landing and nothing. They want all the cheap labor they could get in this country. So going back to the reality, there's when Clinton ran for office, another slime ball, murderous little clown the back stage in the campaign, the slogan was, it's the economy, stupid, that's what the people care about

the most. And the going back to the clown Biden's speech last night, that's what they're going to keep doing. So he let's go back. Gold prices are going way up, as we had forecast. The reason they're going up to number one, the lower interest rates go, the deeper the dollar falls, and the higher goal prices go because gold is dollar based, so as the dollar goes down, is cheaper for other countries to buy gold.

And by the way, China splurge on gold for sixteen straight months and they when they the People's Bank bought about almost four hundred troy ounces of gold last month. Four hundred thousand all right, wow. And it's one bank after another. The number of central banks buy and combined total around one thousand tons a year. And this is according to Rona, the head of Stoneeck's financial

Limit. It so reason number two. World War three has begun. It's not going to become official until there's a major event that happens that, oh my god, like a nine to eleven, like the bombing of Pearl Harbor. It was going on before that. So there's gonna be Look what happened when three people were killed three you know, on the Jordan Syrian border in America, bombs away over Syrian or rock. So what it's gonna happen.

There's gonna be a major falls flag event, or's something that's gonna make World War three official, and they're gonna do it in the Middle East with the United States Israel going after Iran. When that becomes that happens, you're going to see oil prices spiked to above one hundred and thirty dollars a barrel. That's going to cross the equity markets and the global economy going back to gold it falls so easily. Yeah, and then going back to gold. Yes.

Geopolitical key, So you got the geopolitical and the real economic we were talking about. The banking banks go bust. The people are suffering. Now, the street people on Main Street feel it. They don't. It doesn't become a reality until Wall Street goes down. Then the people feel it as the real pain. And again you're looking now the data just came out the you got the uh, the unemployment rate's almost four percent now, actually it's

much higher. Absolutely, the official rate now is three point nine percent. And again you look at Challenger and Gray came out with an article yesterday that the the layoffs are the highest rate since two thousand. Here we go, not making it up. Layoffs rise to the highest rate for any February. You're since two thousand and nine. That's the height of the Great recession. Wow. And again we had forecast. I took out the domain name the

Panic of eight in two thousand and seven. So we're going to go to a So going back to gold gold number one. I'm very bullish on bitcoin, not because I like it hate it. It's because the people don't understand what's going on. You have an inflation rate in Argentina, for example, about two hundred and fifty percent. People can't buy gold. So what they're

doing is is they're watching their currency go down. The crap at Turkey one after another with inflation in Turkey's white about sixty eight percent, they're buying bitcoin. They're buying like a tiny bit, a tiny bit, a tiny bit. So that's going to keep driving the prices up. So bullish on bitcoin, gold and silver is a longer shot. And again we don't give financial advice. We're saying what we what we see and why, and so that's

how we see this folding. Well, it's it's extremely important, and people can see what has been happening to gold recently. It's the inevitable consequence of a central banking system that is funding a massively indebted nation state that continues to try to play on people's political funny bones and rub them, rub their backs and scratch their under their chins. It's got to stop. People need to recognize it, or at least prepare. And you know, I really admire

this cover. If I might again show at Gerald hate Israeli genocide, you're an anti Semite, because I agree with you, and I think that their target is Iran. They want to take out Iran, and they also want to overthrow a sod in Syria. As long as long as it takes them,

they'll try to wipe him out. And I worry very, very greatly that the United States government and various NGOs might be working to try to bring in certain immigrant factions that they already know they've got here and will be ready to do something that will we depicted as anti Semitic activities, like trying to take out a Jewish synagogue or something else. Oh yeah, a Jewish synagogue. Went. You could blow up all the musts you want and Gaza,

but don't touch a synagogue. Yeah yeah, unbelievable, And it just blows me away that at the same time that Joe Biden and his fatuous gang of creeps can sit there and say, well, we need to make sure Israel has a right to exist. First of all, philosophically, no state has any stinking rights. Their states their abstract entities. They're not human beings. Second of all, if you want to send a check to Israel, mister Biden, you go ahead and do so. Leave my neighbor out of it.

And I don't quite understand how it is they can talk about democracy and freedom and things like that, as those poor people there have been told, oh, go to say con unists, and then they bomb conunists, go to this hospital. It's it's unbelievable. Week after week, day after day, everything the Israeli government says has been shown to have been a lie or

not substantiated with any real proof. And stopping at that about a lie about all the Jewish women that were raped by Hamas, Yes, exactly exactly. And Aaron Monte did a great job exposing that stuff. Right. And Max Blumenthal a Jewish guy, why might Oh? And Norman Finkelstein brings out the truth? Why that that anti Semite? Oh? And Joe Biden says, I'm a Zionist. I'm not aware. Go over there and go oh Joe

Biden. Joe Biden's about three and a half years older than me. He got five draft defarments during the Vietnam War five a little fat mouth that loves war five draft from its same with Trump. Trump got over one hundred million dollars from Sheldon Adelson and braggs I've done more to Israel than any other president. Oh. And I moved the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, and I said to Israel, Yeah, the land you stole from Syrian, the

Golan Heights, it's yours. Who the hell people representing? Oh? And Israel? How many times have I heard this one? Israel has the right to defend themselves. Nobody else does. Nobody else does. Now, Israel has no right to exist. And here are the facts. And if anybody, anybody could deny these facts, let me know. Here's your trends journal

going back to two thousand and six. Crusades two thousand. You ready, Yeah, regardless of what England's reasons or intentions were, self serving or otherwise, Crusades two thousand was set in motion by the nineteen seventeen Balfour Declaration that laid the foundation for Israel. Quote, his Majesty's government. Let wait, stop with his Majesty's government some murderous slime ball from the UK. Yeah, that's right. His Majesty's government views with favor the establishment in Palestine of a

national home for the Jewish people. Hey wait a minute, who the hell is he to say what should be going on in Palestine? To say it's a national home for the Jewish people? Well, I guess he got the money from the Rothschild gang, didn't he. Oh? Those are the facts? Yes, yes, go on, I hear it goes on and will use its best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of the subjective. You stole a landron of Palestinians. You got the money from the Rothschild gang to do it.

Yep. They are an occupying force. No occupying force has any right to claim that they are defending themselves. And of course, any of those soldiers on those grounds, if they're using weapons, those weapons were gotten through taxation. I love this ridiculous canard that they try to sell people that a nation state has a right to defend itself. Ergo, therefore we are going to force you. You can't defend yourself against Joe Biden. You got to

cough up the money to blast apart more Palestinian people in Gaza. That's their logic. It's disgusting. And to show you the more disgusting, this is from Ahara. It's not reported in one, not one major newspaper in America. This is this is the sixth What was that Wednesday? Israel approves construction of three thousand, four hundred and seventy six housing units in West Bank settlements. You mean stolen land and violation of the Geneva Convention and Article two four

two of the United Nations. They're not settlements, just stolen land, but we'll call it settlements, just like we say Israel has the right to defend itself and not report at all, Israel could steal all the land that they want. Oh oh, and you see the number that came out about thirty of the Palestinians that they arrested recently died in jail. Yeah, and they don't call those hostages. They have held hundreds of people every year in Israel

without trial, extra judiciar. Here's some of them, teenage kids and women the yeah, and women. Absolutely. And so if people were to use the logic that Israel can go in and wipe out civilians so they can get their hostages back, well, the Palestinian and the Hamas authorities could use the same logic to say we can go into Israel because you every year have held hundreds of people without trial. You're holding them in a corral, for God's

sake. Here, this is that little boy, Anthony Blincoln. Oh this is right after. This is October twelfth, a couple of days after Hamas attack, which I'm totally opposed to, the mass attack. Quote talking to net Yahoo, I come before you not only as the United States Secretary of State, but also as a Jew. How about you come here as an American? I could care yuh, less. What religion you believe in? Unbelievable, Yeah, unbelievable, and of course for him, how about coming

to you as American? Just it's religion you believe in the sucking me that you are the chosen people and God gave you this land. Shun it and they're sucking your lifeblood and and again. I'll bring it back to Kingston, you know, I know it's a massive left wing enclave there. Some of these people accept their own domestication. It's just sad and and you know, I don't know what. Hopefully you'll stick around there. It's a beautiful area

and hopefully I'll be able to visit you again. You know, I got to go down there when David was speaking and so on to meet you. It was great, And uh, I really hope that I get the opportunity to do that. I know you're planning something for the fall coming up. Gerald. Yeah, we're gonna have I may even have an earlier occupy piece. We're going to try to do as many as we can. I got

to run, but I want to read this quickly. Yeah, I'm an American and I stand by with the founding fathers fought for This is George Washington's farewell address. A real man that fought a real general, Not like that little betrayed us guy that that betray us. That's not working for KKK. That not that guy who the troop surgeon Afghanistan. Not Lloyd Austin, Not him who couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag. All that weight. They don't make a paper bag big enough. This is a real man

that fought George Washington quote. It is our true policy, this is his farewell address. To steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world. Observe good faith and justice stood all nations, cultivate peace and harmony with all The nation which indulges toward another an habitual hatred, like we've been taught since I'm a kid hiding under a desk in case in Adam Baum went off hating Russia. The nation which indulges towards an habitual hatred or an habitual

fondness like we love Israel is in some degree as slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its infection, either of which is sufficient to

lead it astray from its duty and interests. A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils, sympathy for the nation favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no common interest exists, and the infusion into one the enmities of the other betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels of wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. Right there, right there, that's not one, not one of these

slide ball politicians speak about or respect. Gerald. You say it beautifully. Bring it in the history and of course Trends Journal. The subhead for Trends Journal is history before it happens. And you work so hard. I'll let you get back to it, Gerald, And thank you for joining me as I filled in for David today. It's always great to hear from you. You are just such a great guy. And I hope I get to see you down there in Kingston again very very soon. People can check out Trends

Journal, they can check out your show with Judge Napolitano. And how do they want to follow you? Follow you on Twitter, slash x yeah, yeah, Gerald Celenti, and same with Trends Journal, YouTube or Trends Journal. And thank you for what you're doing. The information and knowledge that you have is you know, it's not many people saying and doing what you're doing. Of course, David Is and a number of us thank you so much. I mean, you know, the facts and the information and that's all

that counts. So the facts, not what people believe in. I'm a again, I'm a political atheist, you know. I just I was doing a show and I pulled this out over here and if I could find it, yeah, here love blooms on the campaign trail. That was my former wife. May she rest in peace. So when I say to you, I was at the top in the in the political world. It's not a bunch of bs or the facts are there. And when I quit, nobody

could believe I was quitting. Said I'm not going to do this. I'm going to I'm not going to be a a little slave to these clowns. And that's all they are there. It's a clown show. It's a presidential reality show. So thank you so much for what you're doing. Thanks Gerald, We'll talk to you and Trends Journal check it out, everybody. It's Trendsjournal dot com. Gerald SLENTI you're not only a gentleman. You're a finally

attired gentleman. Your sartorial taste is amazing and sorry your principles appreciate it very much. Gerald, thanks so much, thank you very much. You got it. You got it, Gerald Celenti. Everybody, what a good guy. And of course Gerald, you can get the Trends Journal for ten percent off if you use the code Night from the David Knight Show, Elvis the Beagle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at ads radio dot com. J it listening to the David Knight Show. Yes,

indeed, great stuff from the David Knight Show. What great music and great comments from people. Also want to turn to the rumble chat and thank you all, and also want to mention that those of you who have been watching over on Twitter slash x I greatly appreciate it. Had an interesting comment in there from Paul. Number of comments from Paul on Twitter slash x and Paul, welcome you said Gerald Soilentes from Yonkers Nuns almost beat him deaf when

he was in elementary school. Yes, it's an amazing story. And he went to high school with son of Sam. I didn't know that not to be you know, the terrible stuff there, but be interesting to talk to him about that. And over in let's see over in rockfin Land, Little John is there, Carlos Rex is there as well, and thank you for the contribution. We have some contributions from Mark Crawford and appreciate that Mark, and anybody wants to do the same. You can do that at Rockfinn or

at Rumble. Please feel free and don't forget. David Knight also has a subscribe star which is really useful and you can check him out over there. And Doug Lug says, thank you Gerald, and thank you Doug. Appreciated. And Carlos Rex has a wonderful statement here. The federal government is a

neurotic. Is a is neurotic? Fascist psychopaths fascist psychopaths, Yep, yep, absolutely, And you know it's interesting how they can there are various ways that they can get people to accept psychopathic behavior, or I would call it sociopathic. The state is by definition sociopathic, so there is a difference between the state and society. Society is the set of arrangements and traditions and developments that we put together through free association. And voluntary contract and work with each

other through our free will. That is society. And you know, philosophers through the ages have understood this. The state is that which is imposed on us. And when I say state, I mean in the generic normative sense, not in the state as in the state of New Hampshire or the you know, differentiating it from other states. I mean the state in the generic political sense. So the state is imposed on us, It is imposed on

people, and the only way it can exist is through in position. If it were all voluntary, then it would be free association and agreement of business contracts something like that. So by definition, if the state is there in front of you, some form of coercion has taken place, and more coercion will take place for it to continue to exist. So the state, by

definition, must draw from society in order to exist. Therefore, everything the state does is a detriment to the decisions made within society, because not all of what you want to do in society can actually be allowed, and some of your earnings will be drawn from you to fund the state. So the state is parasitic off society and blocks society. The state is sociopathic, It is pathological. Towards society. By definition, it's inarguable. It's just a

simple logic syllogism. So logical syllogism, so the you know, I discussed this on Liberty Conspiracy and if you want to watch, it's six pm Monday through Friday on Rumble and Rock Fin and we get into this. You know, I tried to put this sort of together as best as I can for students. It trot at a charter school for a while. I was a

little too radical for them. But you know, if I'm doing lectures or anything like that in front of students, I try to, you know, lay these things out with these parameters, and you can't escape these things. It's sort of like, you know, people are talking about Elon Musk and X and the fact that he might shadow ban or decrease the visibility of people who intentionally so called misgender or don't use the pronouns that someone wants to use someone wants them to use for them. Well, you know, look,

there's there's reality. I had a student one time say, oh, no, you can use day for single person. So I said, okay, if you think you can use they for a single person, let me give you a couple quick examples in television. Oftentimes they will use the garbage pronoun they for one person because they don't want to say whether it was a man or a woman. People often fall into that trap. They don't use proper grammar, they're not precise, they don't use their words properly. I understand

sometimes in conversation things slip by. You get a custom to things. But it's good to stand up once in a while. It's good to try to maintain a standard, right so I said. So for example, Channel nine wmu R here in New Hampshire, it's the only ABC only network affiliate. They might report, hypothetically, the Manchester Police or Goffstown Police have apprehended the suspect, the suspect in a series of arsons. They will be arranged on Tuesday. Okay, So they don't want to say whether it's a man or

woman. Rather than saying he or she, we don't know the identity of the person. They say, they well, how many people were arrested one? How many? You got to have specifics if you're a cop, and we've already seen this stuff. They're starting to do this now in California. Well, we got to describe somebody in very oblique terms. Well, that's gonna make it a lot easier to find your suspect, isn't it? Underhead right? I mean, come on, seriously, has some respect for yourself

for goodness sake? And then how about respect for others primarily? That would be nice. And then I said look to the student, I said, look, if you work in an emergency room, you don't use THEY for one person, and you want to know is it male or female who's being brought in in the ambulance. You don't go to dispatch and hear they, because that means you're going to prepare more than one room for the incoming emergency.

You want to know male or female because that has an effect on your choices of things for possible problems for a potential victim coming in in an emergency. There are variations, there are biological truths. We can't get around these things right. So it's just absurd and it demeans oneself to not stand up for truth. And we're only here for a certain period of time. Why not stand for truth? That would be nice. I'll leave you with this.

You know, we talked with Toby Leary about the bump Stock story, and I could give you the information from my MRCTV video recently, but I just want to reaffirm some of the information that being on the bump stock case in the Supreme Court. You can check it out. I'll show it again tonight on my Liberty Conspiracy show tonight. It's about I think it's about ten

minutes long, so we might go over time on David's show today. But I want to just reiterate a couple things that I mentioned so that you have the information in front of you and feel free if you want to drop comments into the chat, and again feel free if you want to donate at Rumble or Rockvin to David's program, that would be great. Everything will go to David and Travis and the whole team. David's not sick or anything like that. They're just taking some time off. And I will be here again on

Toys Day next week. As police Squad would say, as of course, people take some time off for the holidays and things like that. So here is this story that I mentioned. US has approved one hundred arms deals for Israel since October seventh to support Gaza slaughter. They were secret arms deals. The Biden administration has secretly approved more than one hundred separate foreign military sales to Israel since October seventh to support the mass killing of Palestinians in Gaza, the

Washington Post reported Wednesday. So at least there is that use for the Washington Post. It's unclear how many of the sales are being funded by the US, but many could be. As Israel receives three point three billion in annual foreign military financing, they could be a form of US military aid that gives foreign governments money to purchase US arms. Only two sales have been made public. Isn't this great? Yeah, it's land of the Free. Yeah.

Self governance. Yeah, you try to govern yourself sometimes, see what happens? Say no, I'd rather keep my money. Only two sales have been made public, one for one hundred and six million dollars worth of one hundred and twenty millimeters tank ammunition. You know, from these people who want to control guns, as Joe Biden said, it's going to stop, there's large capacity firearms. Oh really, Joe, is that true? What do you describe as large capacity? Where do you get the moral authority to do that?

Even if you amended the constitution I didn't sign it. I'm not part of your deal. That's why I'm a voluntarist. I have rights, and just by people ganging up saying oh, we can take your stuff, or signing a piece of paper and saying, oh, we amended this thing, at least they could go with their promises to abide by the constitution. I

don't promise that, but at least they could go with that. Personally, I'd prefer the articles confederation, or I'd rather have the Brehon Lass system that was very close to an anarchic system, or the Viking Goddard system sort of a tribal sort of a thing. Only two sales have been made public, one hundred and six million worth of one hundred twenty millimeters tank ammunition and one for one hundred and forty seven point five million in components needed to make one

hundred and fifty five million millimeters artillery shells. US officials told the Post that there was no public debate for the other one hundred deals because the dollar value fell under the threshold needed to inform Congress. Ah, you know, that's always good stuff. How about that declaration of war thing? Oh, no, we can use the term authorization to use military force. No, you can't. But did you even bother doing that? No, we didn't do

that either this time. Good. Thanks. You want to use any other terms like frisbee that's not in the in the constitution. And here is this one from of all things Bloomberg US ways tapping army funds for Ukraine. As AID bill stalls, they would target roughly two hundred million dollars in you got it reserve funds, and Biden's sixty one billion dollar request remains tied up in

Congress. So that was one of the reasons why Biden had invited Voldemlo Mayor Zelensky's wife to attend, and also Navilne's wife to attend, but neither of them attended the State of the Onion last night because it was part of his agenda, the agenda cooked up by other people like Blincoln and others to push more weapons to Ukraine. What I think is pretty darn cool is that Thomas Massey invited Juliana Sange's brother to attend last night and he sat in front of

Joe Biden. That's pretty cool. Just gonna check my notes out make sure that I covered everything that I was hoping to cover for you tonight or today, and I will welcome you if you are interested to join us tonight on Liberty Conspiracy and of course check out David's channel every Monday through Friday starting at nine a m. On Rumble and Rockvin D Live. You can get the

audios, get the podcasts. A lot of great information coming from him, and it will help us fight people like her and people like him and her and him. Let's head over into the chat to round things off, and I want to welcome everybody once more. Thank you so much for being there, Harps. Remember also if you go to Gold dot David Knight dot Gold, David Night dot Gold, that will bring you to Wise Wolf Gold and Silver Exchange and you can connect with the wolf Pack. It's a great idea

that Tony Ardeburn has started. Tony ardeburner of the Ardiburn Radio and of course America Unplugged of Paratrooper and Wisewolf Gold and Silver based in Missouri and Texas. I see Harps is there from Australia. Thanks Harps. I was talking about the late nineteen nineties, mid nineteen nineties after the Port Arthur massacre. The Australian so called gun by and how violent crime actually didn't go down until years later, and yet people claim that it went down, which is completely counter

to facts. And dougle Luck said, Happy Friday all, thank you, guard, good show, thank you, thank you so much. You all really appreciate that. And Jason Barker, thank you for being there and doing what you do over at the Foxhole and Nights of the Storm they'll be on tomorrow, folks ten a m. For Nights of the Storm over at Rumble. I want to thank Flying axe Blade for being there, and I appreciate you being there as well. And he says it's not some other overreach of

power indicative of the future of future totalitarianism. We already have that. Yeah, and I see that dragon Dragon Grieta is there. They have filled our country with enemies and bull dag d a A g G says Trump left Assange hanging. Yes, and don't forget that officials during the Trump administration Pompeo plotted to kill Assange. That would be Pompeo. I have video of Pompeo dancing with IDF soldiers while the IDF soldiers outside of their little dancing area in Israel.

We're blasting apart Palestinian people and taking their land because they care. They care so much. Sorry, that sounds pretty preachy. So look, thank you so much everybody for being here, Thank you for being kindred spirits. Remember to watch David's show Monday through Friday, nine am. Be here, be here live if you can't, and you can watch it, share the video after the fact, give it the thumbs up, spread the word, and also please watch us on Liberty Conspiracy Monday through Friday at six pm.

David Night at nine am. I'm on at six pm Monday through Friday, will be rolling it tonight. And of course you can find Liberty Conspiracy and my subs deck. Go to the Gardener Goldsmith substack. You want to follow me on Twitter, it's at guard Goldsmith g r D and Liberty Conspiracy. Just look for it on Rumble and Rock Finn. And thank you everyone for being such good people. Really appreciate it, and thank you to Travis and

David and everyone. Watch for David Monday, spread the shows over the weekend, great insight. The segments are on Twitter and on GAB and on Rockfin and Rumble. You'll find great stuff from David's Show. Thanks everyone, take care, As the prisoner says, be seeing you the common man. They created common Core. They've gummed down our children. They created common Past to track and control us, their Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing

and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share

the information and links you'll find at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidknightshow dot com