Fri 30Aug24 The David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

discuss today, breaking news, philosophy, history, and your opinions. Get ready, everybody will be rolling until noon today with special appearances by people like Kamala Harris, Dana Bash and even some more astute people like opinions from Glenn Greenwald and perhaps a joke or too from jd Vance a joke. Thanks for joining us on the David Night Show, one and all. Well, it has been a very busy past twenty four hours since the last David Knight Show started off at nine am.

Of course, you can find David Knight's program live every Monday through Friday from nine to noon Eastern time, or as I sometimes say I often say on my Liberty Conspiracy program at six pm whatever time zone you call home. Hope you can make this your home away from home. Thanks for being here everyone. I'm Gardner Goldsmith filling in for David today who's taking so much deserved time off

with the family. And I get to join the David Knight family here, join us live on d Live on Rumble, on Rockfan and of course on David's X. And I hope you will check his show out after the fact as well. Follow him at Liberty Terrian on X and of course the Davidknightshow dot com. Go to David Knight dot gold if you want to check out the Great Connection with the Great Tony Rdeburn, The Wise Wolf, Gold

and Silver Exchange. And thank you for being here. And if you're interested in my work, I do work for MRCTV, the Media Research Center, and I also do my Liberty Conspiracy program every Monday through Friday at six pm or

whatever time zone you call home. We are there Monday through Friday, breaking apart the news, gathering intellectual ammunition from the breaking news, making sure we don't forget things from the news cycle amnesia as things pass by us, and hopefully getting some information that we can pass on to our progeny to defend liberty, defend peace, and defend our God given rights and make friends. It's a beautiful day here in southern Russia, Hampshire, Ire, Yes, indeed Moscow, hamp Sharanski.

As we spread the Russian propaganda, we are the adjut prop masters. So I want to welcome everyone and please hit the thumbs up, give it the shares over on X. I already see one of our fellow liberty conspirators is there. He goes by the name of I can't believe so I saw you out of the corner of my eye. I'll say a big hello to you and happy morning or night, whatever time zone. Thanks for being there, my friend,

and everybody in the original home of Rockvin. Terrific people, and of course terrific people at the folks at MRCTV. I don't advertise my Liberty Conspiracy show at MRCTV. It's not part of my contract. But those of you who do find me at X thank you for doing so, because I do get to mention that at Liberty at MRCTV. So it's been an absolutely busy past twenty four hours.

We've got a lot on tap today. We're going to be joined in the ten o'clock hour for a little while by the former head of the Free State Project, Carla Garrick, and she if you're not familiar with Carla, she actually won a Supreme Court ruling on being able to film the police, so it's going to be a

very interesting conversation with her. We'll talk about local communities avoiding the technocratic, technotronic state and the snoopers that we see are trying to invade more and more with the most recent arrest of of Paval Durov, and what has been going on with the pressures on Rumble and X, and we'll discuss how we can create those local bonds with people and what the Free State Project has been doing.

They're terrific, terrific people. I love them. I grew up in New Hampshire and yet having all these fellow libertarians here in New Hampshire has been such a blessing. I'm

sort of an honorary Free State Project member. We'll also be joined by Eric Peters to talk about the latest on Ford's move to get away from their evs, which have been an absolute disaster, plus other information about freedom of movement and freedom of speech, because of course Eric has a lot to say about that, and perhaps we'll be joined by Jason Barker in the last half hours.

So of course, Jason Barker Knights of the Storm. You can go to their website and find out all the information about so many exceptional broadcasters and opinion and thought thought investigators, you might say, over at the Nights of the Storm. And of course he has his show, The Foxhole. Nights of the Storm will be going out live tomorrow at ten am, so check them out on Rumble. So

thanks for being here everyone. I hope I do a fantastic job for David on this day that optimistically we can say that we're going to be looking at some of the shadows of the shadow play. I was talking about Plato Socrates as parable of the Cave the other day. Evidently Plato and Socrates thought they were smart enough to see the puppets, and everybody else was just too ignorant. But there does seem to be a certain amount of shadow play that these folks are involved with this spectacle.

Perhaps maybe not so much as shadow play, but the spectacle, the simulacrum, this spectacle, simulacrum of choice and free will and self government. As we saw the CNN interview pre recorded and it was so hard hitting with Dana Bash

and Kamala Harris doing the wall. So we'll talk about that as well as a number of other things, as well as discussing, of course, a very interesting story that I brought up last night, and if you get to see the preview for the show, for the David Knight Show, we're going to be talking about the climate cult and just how disastrous it has been on Cape Cod in Massachusetts.

You might have heard some of the stories about one of the wind turbine blades breaking apart off of Nantucket, washing up fiberglass pieces onto the beach, which everybody knows. It's absolutely great for the fish, it's great for the whales, it's great for the lobsters, and it's great for all the people whose livelihoods depend on it, who plunked a lot of money, time and effort into having families dependent

upon their income. And yes, we're going to be hearing from one of those lobster men who's been working at it since essentially he was nineteen eighteen years old, and he had some very good opinions that we're making a buzz around New England. So I wanted to get that out to all of you, So thank you everyone for being there. Want to say hi, give me the fin by five and don't forget this is the last day

for the month. So if we can generate some donations to David's show, and you can be the producers, as David's been saying recently, it's a great idea. You can

help produce the show. You can back this show. Remember we're open over at Rumble, We're open at Rockfinn, and I'd love to see great amount of folks contributing because of course it's on my back today to finish off the month for David, and they were getting close, but we want to make sure that they can get as close as possible or surpass their goal for the month for donations for the show, because that's how this show operates.

Thanks for being here, everybody. Really good time last night with the crew, the gang over at Liberty Conspiracy and I see already populating inside Rock Finn. We've got Harps inside, Steve Swan is there, Octo Spook is there, Lacy Toad is there, and Doug Luck. I salute you, I take off, I put on my Redactive Care and I take it off for you, and they're a great team as well.

Monday through Thursday at four, So let's see what's on tap for the rest of the program and take a look at some of the things that happened over the past twenty four hours, or perhaps go back a little way so we don't get that news cycle amnesia. On my program, I often do something that I like to call the news flash. So today we're going to go on David Knight Show with the news flash, and it's got a little music in there, a little theme for warfare,

not only internationally kinetically, but the politicians against you. Let's see what's been going on recently.

they know where my heart is. And again, my record has been out there for over forty years to be for itself.

on my dog. I'm not going to do that. And the one thing I'll never do is I'll never demean another member's service in any way. I never have and I never will.

apart some of these stories. Offer your opinions, and of course get our guests involved in this as you saw, yes, Harrison Waltz, we're doing the Waltz with the ever hard hitting Dana Bash on the ever increasing or perhaps decreasing CNN as they just let a bunch of people go and they said they were going to be applying more of their attention to online cultural news. So whether you want to believe that cultural news, that's up to you

as well. But of course last night was the very exciting discussion between Harris and Waltz and Dana Bash, and I thought there was a bit of an amusing one that came from of all people, jd Vance. So let me show you this because this is actually amusing. It's not his original idea, but it is kind of funny.

And this is perhaps the way that some people thought the conversation went with Kamala Harris last night, as repeatedly she got asked questions and seemed to answer with completely different subjects that were on her own mind.

a right to be left alone by you. We are blessed with rights by God, and superseding that and taking over somebody's choices for his own free will is to put ourselves between that person and God, and I think that that is illegitimate. I don't believe that any state entity has any authority over anyone, no matter how many pieces of paper they write, and no matter how long ago those pieces of paper were written by other people to force you to say you complied to it, you

didn't give your consent. In most cases, most people, unless they joined the military, unless they got into politics, they didn't give their consent. However, I have done a lot of research and done a lot of writing on constitutional issues, taught political philosophy and things like that, so I'm aware of the way that the rules are supposed to operate under the US constitutional system, and I admire a lot of the things that those people tried to do during

the constitutional period. I'd much prefer the Articles of Confederation, which saw eleven I believe people who actually served as President of the Congress, the Continental Congress. I believe John Hancock was one of them. But I understand what the rules are. And strangely, it is a simulacrum, isn't it, Because what they're doing and what is actually in the Constitution don't often comport. As people get closer and closer to the election time and they've got to decide, they've

got to decide for their own self control. I don't understand how that works, but I've got a theme for that, and it's pretty good with this little video from the Psychedelic Furs. Fellow anarchists. Don't know whether there are Christians anarchists. Is really just anarchy, no human ruler. It's not violence the way that it was depicted by a lot of the socialist the early nine in nineteen hundreds.

night's extravaganza. What are we going to be discussing on the David Knight Show overall tonight today everyone, Well, for this thirtieth day, we're going to be of course talking about the Harris Waltz dance across CNN. While Trump provides promises to mandate insurance companies to pay for IVF, he was doing that while they were broadcasting the CNN interview.

He was there with Tulsey Gabbert. So there are some major problems with IVF, and there's some major problem morally with IVF, and there are some major major constitutional and moral problems with mandating insurance companies pay for it or

having the federal government subsidize it. And of course, Tim Waltz claimed in an indirect way that he and his wife father to children through IVF, which often is seen as a free choice parallel to abortion so called rights, the right to take another human life after it's already been created. No, I'm sorry, Well IVF they freeze embryos, human lives, they put them in stasis. So people who are backing that particularly forcing other people to pay for it,

either insurance companies or my neighbor through taxation. And we'll look at this Donald Trump quote that is very problematic, and I understand how emotional it is for some people who can't can't have kids, and they try these different ways. But there's a much larger picture here that I hope people will consider. Then we'll have a Durov update, we'll have the speech attacks in the UK and more that tie into that war on producers, Kamala Harris's Border Tyrannus

and more s'mores. We'll talk with of course, the Free State Project and Carla Garrick who be telling us about our Supreme Court battles. And we'll get into yes, evs and climate cultis on Cape cod with Eric Peters. But let's get into this CNN story. And here's some of the quotes that I found. I wanted to share them one with you.

they know where my heart is. And again, my record has been out there for over forty years.

the worst evil Santa. Thank you, Mary Ellen. That's classic. We'll continue.

And it was really important to me because of course I'm just a massive gun grabber. So don't you get it. Anything I say should be acceptable. And of course if you actually think that what I said was a lie, well I've got an excuse for that too. My wife knows I'm kind of a dufus.

others in any way whatsoever. Wow, Wow, what an offensive person. Unbelievable. Now, let's show what Donald Trump was doing at the same time time that this was on.

to have that. And I've been seeing a lot of IBF, and I kept theory that I'm against it, and I'm actually very much forward in fact in Alabama where the judge ruled against it, and I countered the judge and came out with a very strong statement for it, and the Alabama.

it's really gone. It's terrific. And I said, so with the tips in with the Social Security that no taxes on Social Security, I said, maybe for IVF, and I've been looking at it, and what we're going to do is for people that are using IVF, which is fertilization, we are going the government is going to pay for it, or we're going to get or mandate your insurance company to pay for it, which is going.

of thing from Donald Trump. They can see the massively u blatantly unconstitutional approach and the lack of any sort of moral conversation about IVF and how it is a cipher to abortion because numerous fetuses are created. These are created and then put into stasis and they're frozen. And that point is not being addressed by some people. Maybe they're hearing it, but they think there are other things on balance that would drive them towards voting for Donald Trump.

As we get closer and closer to the elections, I think it's important for me to make sure that I put them together and show that for me, at least, they are a non choice. I already philosophically will not support putting people into offices, occupying the offices of levers of control over people. I just won't do that. I won't do that in any way, in any way that I can. I try to eliminate the burdens of the

state over other people. In argumentation or if I do vote, it's a town vote on a budget, and I always vote no, and so I think that this hopefully will generate some people who might be on the fence. As we get closer and closer and the explosion of the election arrives, is that pressure builds and builds and builds. I know a lot of people are going to say, well, I've got to make a choice. This is to me a non choice. So I thought that it would be

pretty important to bring that up. And I want to just mention again the idea of mandates on anybody through the state is immoral, and mandates under the Constitution for anything like that are just They're rivaled, they're in your face unconstitutional. And he already has sworn an oath to the Constitution, So I don't know if someone might want to remind him of that, but I understand how emotional

is for Tulca Gabbard. She didn't address it. She's sworn an oath to the Constitution numerous times, and she did so while she was in the Middle military. So that, of course then brings me to thoughts of how could she remain in the military when the United States government was shipping her overseas without any declaration of war, When as a judge Apollo the Neapoloitano mentioned to Gerald Celente in their conversation on Wednesday, the United States has essentially

nine hundred bases scattered all around the globe. No declaration of war. The president is not supposed to lead troops unless there's a declaration of war. The rest of it, it's supposed to be we are the members of the militia. We can be called up if there's a declaration of war to go after enemies from a foreign nation state. If the enemies are not suited under the guise of the foreign nation state, they don't declare war against the

nation state. They issue letters of mark and reprisal. So all of this authorization to use military force, the AUMF from the w Bush era going into Iraq, going into Afghanistan and then taking people at the rendition sites, putting them in Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, none of that that is so offensive to the concept of the US Constitution.

But it is a mutation, and I think a logical mutation from the Monroe doctrine, where James Monroe essentially started that to say, well, you know, in order to protect the United States, we're going to go make sure that most of the Caribbean is protected wink wink by the United States, which led to a lot of United States overthrows of government in the Caribbean and South America, and they just metastasized it. Now it's all around the world. Got to give money to Israel, got to give weapons

to Israel. How about you leave us out of it, regardless of where one stands on the issue. How about I'm left out of all of that, and I'm left out of the moral imposition of having to pay for somebody else to create fetuses and then freeze them and never see their lives actually come about any more than that. Essentially, it's freeze killing. You know, it's birds eyeing other people. I don't get it. But there's a lot more to talk about regarding the CNN interview, So let's go with

Glenn Greenwald. Glenn Greenwald had a very good comment on this, and we'll show a little bit of the interview with Harrison Waltz. He says, of course, Glenn Greenwald, of course, working with Edward Snowden now lives in South America because he's not coming back to the United States very often. He's not going to live here. He'll be in danger of getting shut down by the government, sort of like you know what the French have done to the CEO

of Telegram. And by the way I mentioned last night in the program, this has secondary effects for all the employees of these businesses. The businesses, the employees of Telegram that were who were stationed in the UAE, they've been they left. They were obviously warned by the heads get out of there. We don't know whether it to be safe for you. Because of course the authorities, whether it be in France or another nation state can a also go after the employees for being part and parcel. They

can say it's joint liability. You too are involved in getting this open platform for people to share information and we just don't like that. Even though they don't actually go after the criminals who might be dealing in child porn on Facebook or mastadon or something like that, they just go after the platform and say we don't like what you're putting out there. We want that censored, and we want backdoors to get access to what you do.

Here's what Glenn Greenwald said, Kamala didn't even remotely pretend she was explaining why the things she pretended to believe when running in twenty twenty are now things she pretends she no longer believes, and from all appearances, he says, there was no zero attempt to insist on an answer. They picked Dana Bash for a reason, So here we go, Jangs.

the states and the border. Well, there's no word immigration in the US Constitution is a state issue, as Thomas Jefferson mentioned in the Kentucky Resolve number four and seventeen ninety eight. But we'll continue because she just mentioned metrics, so obviously she knows more than all the rest of the people out there. She's going to try to control to.

public health lockdowns, like Tim Wallas had. David and I did a great interview with a woman and her husband. She went to jail for months just because they tried to keep their business open. Which, by the way, if you want to bring this up to any of your state politicians, there's something in the US Constitution called the contract Clause, and that states that no state government can

interfere in the fulfillment of already existing private contracts. So if you've got a contract as an employee with your employer or the other way around, or you've hired somebody to come work at your house or whatever it is, and then all of a sudden, Tim Walla says, we're going to have lockdowns. It's going to be really, really important for the public health, so we're going to sacrifice your individual rights. Guess what he's breaching the contract clause.

Of course, if you bring it up to him in a town hall, any forum, even though he multiple times has swore an oath to protect and defend the Constitution, I doubt he would understand anything of what you're talking about, but you would be right. You would nail them but doesn't matter if they've got the power that you can be right all you want. That's the problem. I'm sure Alexander Hamilton is very pleased with his made up idea of the Constitution being malleable and a living document. Wink wink.

Thanks Al.

an Israeli flag at them. But there's no international criminality going on in any way with the United States government, just as counter Biden or the members of barismations.

Waltz immediately starts bragging about his record. Question you said you carried weapons in war, but you have never deployed actually in a war zone. Have you ever? You have never, she says. He says, I'm super proud of my military service. I'm proud to have done twenty four years of wearing a uniform in this country. I will never shame someone else for their service. This guy has holy s on it.

I just want to mention, as a matter of constitutional fact, ever since World War Two, no United States soldier, regardless of the fatuous claims of that man. Waltz as he dances around the truth. No US soldier has carried weapons of war in war. Technically speaking, they might have gone into combat, but they weren't at war because they have not declared war. And that is a very hard truth to mention to people. It sounds brutal, but it is

the truth. That is the truth. And if people believe that they are constitutionalists, they had to look for the word immigration in the Constitution. It's not there. And just remember the declaration of war has a capital D in a capital W because it was seen as a term of art. You didn't take out women and children and other civilians. He didn't torture people. But of course the Bush administration sent Alberto Gonzalez from the White House to Congress at the time they wanted to invade Iraq to

ask them specifically not to declare war. And one guy named Ron Paul said, the United States shouldn't be invading this land, but I will offer a declaration of war to put you all on record to show, and he got three votes. Tom Tancredo voted in favor of it, and someone else did, but he didn't vote for it. Ron Paul did not vote for it, so as a quick reminder. I want to turn to my MRCTV site because there are a couple pieces here that I think he might find valuable, and this one is one of

them that pertains to Tim Wallace's troubles. As I noted, Tim Wallace's troubles, troubles with truth appear to multiply. So here's this piece, and thanks to the MRCTV team for putting together a good production.

children through in virtual fertilization IVF. Now, on the self promotion of his time in Nebraska, she writes this quote Waltz's two thousand and six boast about being named outstanding Young Nebraskan can still be found in an archived version

of his campaign website. That November, the president of the Nebraska Chamber of Commerce, Barry Kennedy, wrote Waltz to object, It has come to my attention that is part of your campaign for US Congress, you have posted your by biography on your website that claims you received an award from the Nebraska Chamber of Commerce for your service to the business community. He stated, plainly, we researched this matter and can confirm that you have not been the recipient

of any award from the Nebraska Chamber of Commerce. End quote. Well, clearly, that is speech from mister Kennedy that should be censored. Ms. Johnson also notes that mister Kennedy asked that Waltz eliminate the reference from his website, and that mister Kennedy said that the Chamber had endorsed Walts's opponent, Gil Guttenet, the Republican incumbent, and what was the public response from Wallace's

congressional campaign quote. Walce's campaign manager at the time said he'd in fact won an award from the Junior Chamber of Commerce, according to a report from Minnesota's Alpha News, and attributed the mistake to a typographical error. The Harris Waltz campaign did not respond to a request for comment, but Gutenacht, who lost to Waltz that year, did speak to the Washington Free Beacon. It fits a pattern of misleading and fabricated statements he has made throughout his political

and personal life. He recalled all political figures are guilty of a bit of puffery. He frequently went well beyond that into prevarication end quote. Yet it's Waltz who gets on the proverbial high horse and endorses government censorship to stop what he calls misinformation.

actually conceived via in vitro fertilization. Rather, they were conceived through a far less costly, less invasive, and non controversial procedure known as intrauterine in seminar, which does not involve the cultivation and potential destruction of embryos end quote. But of course one can readily recognize two characteristics from that statement. First, it's a statement that is slightly ambiguous, not offering a direct cause and effect relationship between IVF and his children.

But of course what he does is imply it he thanks God for IVF, allowing the reader or the viewer to think that it is a procedure that actually led to his offspring. But it also allows him an out to say that he never directly claimed IVF gave him and his wife their two beautiful children. And then there's the thinking of God part thanking of God for IVF

in the first place. Well, since IVF creates so called spare embryos that are human beings but become trapped in stasis, frozen, not implanted in them, and not allowed to live, one wonders how Walts could muster the gall to cite the Lord as he praises the procedure. Obviously, Walts brings in

IVF because in many cases it is a parallel to abortion. Okay, so posit there, And you know, to be as fair as possible to those people who have you know, discussed this amongst you know, in couples and things like that,

some people might like an IVF too. Well, what if you're a couple and your wife has had numerous miscarriages and and you know, how how do they decide that doesn't that show that there's an increased risk of another miscarriage or something that's I think that's quite different than intentionally knowingly working with scientists to intentionally and knowingly create human lives that you know, some of those lives will

never continue. That's a different matter. You know, one of it is up to God and one of in the hands of people, and you're actually taking steps to prevent the furtherance of life. So there's a major problem with that, I think. But you know, I did want to add that at least to you know, mention some of the things that come to my mind as I try to engage in a pseudo conversation with people, or at least to some of the things that I've heard from people

about the procedure. So Tim Waltz, Yeah, Tim ay Is, he's got some problems, but there's some other problems when we look at this conversation, and of course I want to talk about this. Let's go with Max Blumenthal on Kamala Harris and her lies about the United States support sending weapons out. And regardless of someone's position on this about Israel and Palestine, the occupy occupying, I think we know who might be on the bad side, the occupying

force of the Zionist State of Israel. And by the way, I guess I can't complain about statism the state in the generic sense if it's attached to Israel. If I'm in Florida, on a college campus or anything like that, because, of course, of two pieces of legislation that Ron DeSantis signed that Kurtail's speech when it comes to Israel, he

signed both of these in Israel. One of them means that you can't hand out flyers opposing the United States policy on a college campus, a state run campus in Florida. And so of course that's a big black mark on Ron DeSantis. But here's what Max Blumenthal had to say about Harris's hypocrisy. Here's the clearest indication, of course, he's from the gray zone. He's going to be at Gerald

Solente's gathering on the twenty eighth of September. In fact, I'll show you the sign for that, just to make sure that I promoted a little bit, because it's going to be a great one in Kingston, New York. He's got a great spot there. Here's the closest indication that Kamala Harris is bought and bossed by the Israel lobby, which is one of the top I think five or three lobbies in Washington, the APEX, and will do nothing

different than genocide Joe. In between tired bromides, Kamala repeats the Hamas mass rape hoax that was fed to her by Israel lobbyists. There is no evidence of that. And as I've mentioned on my program, the family of one of the women whom they said was mass raped before the Hamas attackers killed her, she was on the phone with her sister minutes before she got killed, so she didn't get mass raped. There is no evidence. It hasn't been brought up. The beheading of children of babies, that

hasn't been brought up. And if you saw that road with all the burned out cars from that festival on October seventh, the weapons necessary to do that were not brought over by Hamas on their motorcycles from Apache helicopters supplied by the United States government. As of course, they engaged in the Hannibal directive saying just wipe out everybody and just show massive retaliatory force, which is exactly what they're doing in Gaza. And of course they're not even

giving anybody. They're using the Lavender AI brought to us. And I've got a piece on this that I want to show a little bit later to Carla and see what she thinks about this. The Lavender AI, which was helped to be developed by Peter Teel, which has a massive error rate. And they supposedly target terrorists there in Gaza, and of course they kill more civilians in places like schools where people are praying. Of course they've killed un

food workers and independent food workers. So and shut down food gates, put up that bogus pier which operated for twenty days cost almost four million dollars, didn't do any thing. All they have to do if they want to cease fire in Israel is stop giving them the weapons. But let's go with Max and hear what Kamali says.

pushed by Israel. It's a temporary ceasefire that would see Hamas return their hostages and would not see what many people have not seen because Kamala Harris doesn't want to discuss it, the hundreds and hundreds of people that the Israeli government kidnaps inside the occupied territory of Gaza every year, sometimes thirteen fourteen year old kids and women, and the citation from the International Criminal Court. Calling Benjamin net and Yahoo a war criminal is not about what happened after

October seventh. It's about what happened to some of those innocent people who were never given due process, who have been tortured according to the ICC in Israeli prisons. So there's a bit of a problem there. She tries to play to women, evidently with information that she can't back up.

Dana Bash doesn't question it, but again, if she wants to play it a journalist, maybe she could actually, I don't know, talk to Max, go to the judge's rally on the twenty eighth and talk to some of the people who are going to be there twenty eighth Piece and Freedom Rally. Joe, Yes, indeed, Gerald Soilente is going to be there, of course, putting it on along with Max Blumenthal, his wife Anya Parampeal. Scott Ritter is going to be there as long as the FBI doesn't rate him. Again, yes,

I know. It's a pretty interesting thing to see how they try to shut down anybody who seems to be associated with RT. They also went after that man Rick Sanchez as well. And Andrew Nepolitano of course is going to be speaking there on the twenty eighth in Kingston, New York at the Four Corners. It is a very

cool place and they have great food, wonderful people. And that's where I got to meet in person, got to meet David and Karen and Travis after having been in touch with David for you know, quite a while, just chatting with him thanks to his help on an MRCTV project I was working on. So great, great people all the way around there September twenty eighth. I hope I can make it down. I think it's going to be great. Now, let's talk a little bit about the reactions to this. Actually, yes,

I've got an opportunity. I want to show you how CNN is showing some of the key takeaways. So here it is. This is analysis from CNN by Zachary Wolf. Okay, so there they are. Great photograph. Vice President Kamala Harris sat down with CNN's Dana Bash for her first major TV interview since becoming the Democrats presidential nominee. I know it's great, Get warm up the coffee. It's going to be a blast. And they say, what would she do on day one in the White House?

gave the middle class a tax break. What they did was they amplified and expanded the number of people that they considered poor to get the earned income tax credit. They gave them forward forward payments for their Medicare, and of course they're going to double pay later evidently if the government's still around to these people. And then they claimed that that was a tax break for the middle class. Just asked Senator Jean Shen about that. She was one of them who lied her way all the way back

into the Senate. It was classic, she says. I think sadly, in the last decade we have had the former president, someone who has really been pushing an agenda and an environment that is about diminishing the character and the strength of who we are. There's that all inclusive pronoun we, the most dangerous pronoun in political parlance. It is the forced inclusion program. It's even if you don't want to be part of it. It's the Kumbaya. We're wrapping our

arms around you. It doesn't matter. It's we. Yes. There's a great novel called We by a man named Zemi Yatin, who was a dissident Soviet novelist, and it got published in France, and evidently George orwell Einrand were heavily influenced by it. Strangely, in the book, nobody has a name.

They all have a number, just like the prisoner. Pushed by Bash about her specific plans, Harris said she would focus on her quote opportunity economy plan to bring down the cost of everyday goods, you know, putting price caps on stuff like a fascist Yeah, which is always really good for supply. It really incentivizes people to recognize that there might be a value in supplying more of something

that people value more. Might be it might be an item that is en dearth and so perhaps it might incentivize people to see high price and say, hey, I'll switch some of my resources over to that and supply more, No, you get diminished supplies, and then when they finally lift the price caps, prices shoot up. And of course there's

nothing in the Constitution that let them do that. They're misreading the Interstate Commerce Clause, which is supposed to be state on state tariff problems that could be resolved by Congress, not if anything goes over state borders. And of course she's going to offer the six thousand dollars tax credit, in other words, a payment of subsidy for newborns. She wants to give twenty five thousand dollars per person for new houses. That'll be great again, an artificial inflation of

the housing industry. And then we've got this. She maintains Bidenomics is a success. I maintain that when we do the work of bringing down prescription medication for the American people, in other words, shifting the cost onto others for the government run medical system, including capping the costs. There you go of prescription medication for seniors at two thousand dollars. When we do what we did in the first year of being in office to extend the Child's tax credit, yep,

you got it. The eitc all that stuff subsidies, that we cut child poverty in America by over fifty percent, which is false. They didn't. Child poverty is increased. She's lying, but Dana Bash or Dana Bash said nothing about that. Finally, let's offer this the opinions from the CNN gang as Yes, it was great. They offered their reactions. They were very excited. This is like again, it's more of the horse race. Oh, their performance. It was a wonderful performance, was it.

But again, absolutely nothing, nothing, no responsibility, no reflection at all on the day one executive actions or anything else they did for three and a half years, or anything she said in her previous campaign, which was to have the most permissive immigration structure. She's trying to skip a block of time at the debate. Trump cannot allow it.

Scott Jennings made very good points there. So there you go. Now, let's talk a little bit about history and just discuss some of the things that people are bringing up as to why this mysterious continuation of funneling of weapons all around the world and specific to Israel seems to be going on. And this goes back a ways thirteen years ago. A person who goes by at Resist Underscore zero five posted this from thirteen years ago from a documentary from

Press TV. Thirteen years ago, the president of the Council of National Interest Foundation sounded the alarm on the influence and he appears with Judgemapolaitano oftentimes.

everyone else. And this is not just to be selective about the United States policies regarding Israel and what's going on in Israel, because you can apply this in a neutral fashion to the United States, as I said, in so many other areas, whether it's the new base that they opened up last year in Poland, and of course when Joe Biden went into Poland and he met members of the one hundred and first Airborne Division back then he was talking about Ukraine and he's like, Oh, they're

really courageous people, almost as courageous as I was when I was playing professional baseball. On top of the truck that I was driving, and I wasn't talking to Hunter Biden about anything having to do with China or Barrisma, and hey man, I'm gonna take you out behind the corn shed and beat you up behind the gym whatever, you know, whatever nonsense. He was spewing the United States

policies regarding Poland when he went there. He actually said to these guys, you've been into Ukraine, you'll know that they are very courageous people. Oh some of you've already been there. He let the cat out of the bag. United States troops were already on the ground in Ukraine.

And as I mentioned before on my show, just to give you an idea of some of the funky things that go on behind the curtain, I was reporting on the overthrow of Ukraine in twenty thirteen because I was sort of tipped off to the United States interest in isolating Russian energy exports back in twenty eleven. I was tipped off to this, I think twenty eleven when I was out West my friend Glenn who used to play

you know Glenn Jacobs. He's the mayor of Knox County now, and so I think he was on when I filled in for David one other time. Great guy obviously very oppost the lockdowns and mask mandates and stuff like that. Really great guy in Tennessee and Knox County. Glenn used to play Kine in the WWE. And so I was out there working on a script for somebody on contract and Glenn said, Oh, I'm going to be in La.

You want to grab some dinner. So we went to a Middle Eastern restaurant and the guy knew Glenn and he came over to us. The manager came over after and started talking about what the United States was going to start to do in Syria. He says, you watch, they're going to try to overthrow assad Asad's not a great guy, but you know, they want to stop Russian energy exports. They have a pipeline they're going to be

building over to Eastern Europe. They don't want that. They want to play with the Saudias to keep the dollar afloat. And of course the Russian said already dropped a lot of the long term bonds starting in two thousand and nine because of the Obama American Recovery Act pumping all the money into the system. They knew that if they got paid back on long term bonds. The money would be worth a lot less than when they invested it, So why get it when you're cutting out a certain

percentage of your return. So they started to invest in gold, and of course that was when the whole move for bricks started up. So I saw what was going on. I was watching, and I saw when they overthrew Yanikovich in late twenty thirteen, and they had the might on kup. Yanikovic had just made a deal with the Russians for about I think it was twelve billion dollars in aid, energy, energy purchases and things like that. Barisma, of course, the

biggest state owned energy company. Sure enough, a few months later, Victoria Newland Jeffrey Pyek get caught on the F the EU conversation on the phone, and what happens You hear them if you pay attention obviously people in this audience probably do. But if you pay attention to something other than what the media wanted people to focus on, which was the f part of it, you can see that they're discussing working with a guy named Johnnibach, who is the head of the Slovada Party, which is a neo

Nazi party. There were photographs of him with Joe Biden, with Lindsey Graham, with Amy Klovitschar and others, John McCain as well, and we hate those Nazis. Oh really, yeah, we support Israel, then why you're working with Nazis and you,

I mean, the whole thing's ridiculous. RT did some very good coverage in a documentary showing the post the Cold War work of the United States working with dissidents from Ukraine to get back into Ukraine, to use Ukraine as a chess piece as the USSR started to dissolve, and then the continuation of the propping up of those people with hardcore neo nationalist heroes that had actually worked with the Germans, the Nazis in Germany. And that's where that

whole malage comes from. And it is a bitter taste and brute that's for darn shore. But the United States government, it's not just Israel. I think right in front of us, we're seeing manifest some of the most blatant, terrible things that are exposures of the genocide that's been going on in Israel. But of course what's been going on with the United States and NATO expansion towards Russia, contrary to what James Baker promised the revivified Russian government back in

nineteen ninety five. I think it's very clear as well. It's a great book called How the West Brought War to Ukraine, and if you go to the anti War dot com website, I think they have an ad for it over in one of their panels. I read it out loud in pieces on Liberty Conspiracy a few nights in a row, and it seemed like the audience appreciated that. I want to turn to our Rumble audience, our Rockfan audience, and our ex audience here on the David Knight Show.

Gardner Goldsmith filling in for David. I do the Liberty Conspiracy six o'clock pm Monday through Friday at Rumble at Rockfann. You can follow me on x at guard Goldsmith Jr. D Goldsmith. And I should mention I went to Boston University and the population there is like eighty something percent Jewish people, right, but there's sort of the Asconazi jew people, and they thought that I was Jewish because my last

name's Goldsmith is actually an English and Irish. It's an English name and I come from English and Irish stock. It's like Naylor or Farmer or you know, cook, any of those profect names from from the UK. But I would hear them say things because they thought I was Jewish. A lot of the kids there say things about the Palestinians and I couldn't really understand it. It was just alien. They just didn't even think of them as human beings.

It was bizarre. And now I'm seeing it manifest and I, you know, I sort of didn't think about it and once it get out of bu, but it's really come back, and it is not good. I want to mention inside rumble a lot of great, great quotes in here from a number of folks, and I want to go back if I can to see. Oh see mcellas says Glenn Jacobs is my mayor thank you. Also, there was someone else in here who had a great handle. I don't know whether I'll be able to find it. I see

Michelle Baum, obaman is there? Oh and do O N T C do not obey? In lit speaks as I choose freedom over force, and someone says hurump way to go three stooges. I dig it. That's excellent. Trucker. Chris FTW says Hitler had all kinds of price controls on his economy and it worked for the people. The issue, once again, isn't a policy, it's the people implementing the policy. Well, I disagree with you. Price controls never work, They're immoral, and it's as people say, you know, it's economics one

oh one. Price controls disrupt the price signal. The only way that you can find out how people value something is if you allow them the free will to exchange in a free market, free from fetters from other people and directions from other people. That is the only way that actually resources can be recognized. As I've mentioned on liberty conspiracies, I have taught economics, resources that we generally call resources aren't even really resources until human beings apply

a value to it that supersedes the value of other things. So, for example, the whales and whale oil was becoming very expensive, but thanks to the creation of diesel fuel, they were able, which was actually quite expensive when it was first put out. But whales were becoming so dear and difficult to get. It was so dangerous to go whaling that it got to a price point where they said, okay, the signals from people, they're saying, this is very difficult to get.

It's not as easy to get, it's not in as great quantity. The price is going up, the demand is not decreasing. For say, lanterns at night, And if you walked into people's houses in you know, seventeen ninety, it would have smelled like paraffin and fish oil because they were burning whale oil to keep lanterns going. But diesel,

not diesel. Kerosene was something that as a replacement. Eventually the price of it signaled by people saw that they could switch over, and then more people saw that there was a profit to be made, so they switched their time and their resources into creation of diesel, the movement of diesel, the refining of diesel, and the whole diesel industry. You have to allow for those individuals who want to express their values personally to express them at the moment

of sale in the price that information. That price is then turned into information that others can see, and the market is allowed to be regulated by individuals. Central planning never works. And even in a war economy, what you discover, like they often say, oh, you know, the World War two brought the United States out of the Great Depression.

That's faults Robert Higgs. One of the first pieces I read by economists and economic historian Robert Higgs was all about how at the time they were turning resources into things like tanks, not refrigerators, or washing machines, or beds for hospitals or new houses for people. So you're shifting

all those resources. And when you put price controls on things, you're shifting the ability of people to be able to decide what the proper price is for them, and you're retarding the proper movement of resources and human resources into areas that people want. So it's just axiomatic that price controls are bad mojo. They're immoral, and they're bad for an economy. And you know, you can try to try to splice out areas where well, it was a wartime

economy and they were successful. Sorry, you know, when you're having a normal, a normal economy, people aren't going to want to invest in, say on to know, bombs and weapons as much as the US government will want to or the central planners will want to with their favors given to special people. So I wanted to bring that up. Thanks for the comment. Appreciate that truck. I appreciate that. And then we've got a lot of other folks here.

We've got Michelle Obama, thank you, and don't forget everybody. You can contribute to The David Knight Show, Inside Rumble, Inside Rock Finn. Hopefully here the last day of the month, I can do a little bit of work and bring in some donations to the show. And I also want to mention that the David Knight Show has has some good folks who contributed at Patriot be Best and I wanted to bring up their website so that it could show it to you. I went over and it's really

interesting and I actually know a person. I don't think he was inspired by Patriot b Best, but he just got into beekeeping and getting honey. Patriot be Best. If you want to find out how to help bees survive and prosper go to patriotbbest dot com. They have a lot of really interesting items and you can grab those. You can go to their site and check out all the great things they have for suggestions on how to get folks who are patriotic folks and believe in being

independent to restore the American bee population. It's Patriot be Best and want to thank them for supporting the David Knight Show. Patriot b Best. Check them out. They're very very cool and you can get all sorts of really cool documents. You can buy separate documents. You can subscribe anything you want at Patriotbebest dot com if you're interested in this or you just want to learn a little bit from people who know what they're doing. Very interesting

stuff to see. I appreciate what they do, all right. And also I want to thank Martin Thorn for commenting inside X. He says thought Provokers that was a while back. Thank you, Martin. Appreciate that very very much. Okay, So a couple of items that I want to sur round off here on the reactions from CNN, all the you know, the gamesmanship while all that is going on, don't forget

that they hate free speech. So I want to give an update about the Durov situation and telegram and for that I want to bring in a little bit of a theme. This again is from the Psychedelic Furs. This is a song called entertain Me, and this is when the Psychedelic Furs, who a lot of people thought were sort of poppy not you know, sort of new wave pop. Their first two albums are incredibly powerful, incredibly dark, two of the best albums ever recorded, Steve Lilly White working

on the production of it. And then they went with Forever Now working with Todd Rudgren, where you see President Gas the song I just played very vari astute lyrics. They also do another song called Forever Now where they mentioned the character of President Gas and they say President Gas is tap dancing for the banker. He's a thief. He isn't very honest, but he's obvious at least. It's very good stuff, and he talks about the worthlessness of

paper money, Fiat currency. They're on the ball, they know what they're talking about. Psychedelic first. So this is a song called entertain Me, which comes from their album. After they did a little bit of a stint when pretty in Pink was used for that movie and they redid it, made it a little more slick and so on, they came back with an album called Book of Days and

it is a cacophony. It's epic, and this is a song told from the perspective of a singer who can't really understand why people sort of want to live vicariously through him, like he's a cipher or an avatar for them, and the lyrics are speak, talk to me, show what I am and cannot be entertain me. I thought that was pretty interesting, coming from a guy who earned most of his loving doing that. So I play this as an opening on my show as a way to introduce

the subject of free speech. And it is quite a noisy song. It's good.

jet in Paris. Now one of the mysteries of that incident was why would he go to France given what I'm certain had been the informed and understood risk that he might be arrested in France, giving the French governments growing anger with free speech platforms, including Rumble, which is no longer available in.

lot of speculation about what those charges were. We covered a press release by the prosecutors that didn't make clear explicitly that it was about Pablo Duram on Monday night. But now we have confirmation that the detention was based on a series of charges that a court has in its first instance, found is a plausible and reasonable set of crimes that weren't further investigation, and that require Pablo Duram to remain in France, bar him from leaving France pay millions of dollars in.

private data information of every user. And if they even think about failing, if they don't build their system to give these governments a back door, they very well may end up being criminally prosecuted. And if palbal Dura of a multi billionaire can be obviously any of the other ones can as well. Now let's go back up to the top a little bit and we will see the document released by the French prosecutors today just to give

you a sense for house sweeping and deliberately dangerous. These charges are there's the prosecutor of the Republic and this is his statement.

quote cybercrime. The document goes on quote this juditional investigation was opened against persons unnamed on charges of quote and there's a variety of charges that we told you about a Monday night called Complicity, in which it's alleged that a variety of users on Telegram, not Pabl Durav, but other users use telegram to engage in various crimes, whether money on during or sale of prohibited technology, or the

sale and transfer of child pornography. And the charges against Paubl duav stem from a theory that as the operator of the social media platform, he can be criminally liable for the criminal acts of anybody who uses his platform, which, as I said when we first reported, this would be akin to arresting AT and T executives and charging them with the crimes of allowing people who have a to have a platform, who say, use the telephone to commit

and plan criminal acts. Obviously, the second that you bring in a prosecution like that, the telephone companies will be highly incentivized to shut down the accounts of any conceivable person who even breathes an ounce of dissent and only allow people who are full fledged, explicit supporters of the US government or it's ideological dogma to communicate. It's the

same analogy for operators these tech platforms. Now in addition to all of these complicity charges, meaning if someone commits a crime using your platform, so somebody uses Twitter to spread criminal disinformation in France and then Elon Musk can become criminally liable for that. Mark Zuckerberg can be if

that happens on Facebook. There's also other charges here that are even more disturbing, including quote the refusal to communicate at the request of competent authorities information or documents necessary for carrying out and operating interceptions allowed by law. In other words, when the French government wants Telegram to turn over information about its users, even though Telegram is constructed with an encryption shell, that makes it impossible even for

Telegram to find out that data. Simply building a privacy app with encryption that cannot have a backdoor, that does not have a backdoor that allows the government or even Telegram to enter as itself now a criminal offense that can not only result in prosecution of the corporation or fins of the corporation, but a rest of the individuals who are running that corporation. Now, if we go down a little bit, we will see there's a bunch of

complicity complicity charges. But then there's also this charge that is unbelievably alarming, quote providing cryptology services aiming to ensure confidentiality without certified declaration. In other words, anybody who provides encryption, which was the technology that really became popular after this note in reporting, is a way for people to protect

their communications from government intervention simply providing encryption. In the second charge, here is quote providing a cryptology tool not solely ensuring authentication or integrity monitoring without prior declaration. Any kind of encryption that doesn't allow the government to have a backdoor to have full access to it is now a criminal offense that can subject the heads of these technology companies to prison.

of this on a parallel track. Actually it has to do with trying to gain access back doors. As Glenn Greenwald said, that seems to have been confirmed, and it does seem like it's the French government which is doing

it itself. But the Digital Services Act of the EU offcom up in the UK and what they're doing to free speech there, just for people who are reposting things on Facebook that they say is anti Semitic or islam Islam islamophobic because they don't like the idea that the government is paying for people to migrate to small towns

in England. Somehow that is Islamophobic. Any way that they can broadbrush and paint the enemy as the bad guy that they see who might be opposing their state policies, their growth of this hegemonic one world concept that will control everything in the giant wi. They will go out

to those people. And what Glenn Greenwild I thought said there, I thought was very pertinent, and I think it's also important to bring up what I mentioned a little bit earlier, which is that the employees of Telegram have left Dubai. This could have an impact on the employees and if you extrapolate that, let's not forget first before I even

go into the employee point. When he talks about encryption, I would like to remind people I wrote an article for MRCTV back in the start of the year because at the start of the year, El Presidente Joe Biden issued another massively unconstitutional executive order. The executive order was for national security, So of course it's all about you.

It's all about the security of the public, which is they claim you, but if you actually want to be left alone, no, the public will crush your rights their claim of the interest of the public the greater good. Of course, it's like public health, it's like all that stuff.

National defense is the same thing as public health. It's all your rights can be eliminated for the protection and furtherance of the group that we claim, which of course negates its own logic because if every individual in their specific group who retains his individuality could be a potential target of state action, that actually puts everyone at risk.

And then what it does is even when they pick off one person, say they drone strike a man who's a US citizen oversees, or they drone strike his son, right al Alwauki and his son without trial, totally extra judicial murder. Right, Let's say they do that. That doesn't mean that your risk of being targeted has decreased at all. There's at least no change, and it might have increased because now the pool of targets is two people smaller.

So the state is always your enemy. It can only exist by it's there for your protection and then telling you you have to pay for your protection and if you want to find out whether it's a ganglan thug agency, whether it's a protection racket, just try asking to not pay for it sometime and you'll see what happens. That's the nature of the state. It doesn't protect rights, it invades rights and claims that it's protecting everybody's rights. That's

not possible. It can't protect everybody's rights and take your money at the same time. And then you get into the operations of the state where supposedly you have free speech rights. Right, Well, if they make everything a public place, which the marsh Viva Alabama decision essentially does, it's up to the government to decide, well, is this for commerce?

the specific people who are involved in this trafficking. We're gonna actually just make sure that we pressure people like Facebook, people at Facebook or Meta even though they're ideologically with them, or people at Twitter, at slash x, and you know, people question whether Elon Musk is in this for some sort of long game or not. Or they go after pavl Durov and they're going to pressure them to open

things up. But at the same time, once they've got that opened up to them, they don't seem to go after the people whom they claimed they were trying to get access in order to stop. Those would be the child predators and so on and so forth. So I think it's important to bring this up because not only does it apply to pav al Durov, but it applies to the employees as this person. Mario Knofal wrote telegrams. Dubai office where Pavel Durov moved the company in twenty

seventeen has been vacant since his detention. No employees have been seen, and the building's security directory lists no contact information. A French magistrate has charged durof with six preliminary criminal counts for allegedly permitting illegal activities on the app. He has posted bail of five million euros and is barred from leaving France, and he has his sources noted there the Wall Street Journal and RT And then it gets even worse for more people because why for people who

are creators or maybe you're donating. What happens if you're donating at a free speech platform like rumble and they're taking a percentage, maybe that sort of thing or rockfin, then you're contributing to this online platform where if they're not censoring, if they're not doing what the policing agencies want, whether it's in the United States or anywhere else, then you too, and creators like me, like David, we could

be shut down. They could come after us. Yes, And just to bring it up again, the executive order from Joe Biden at the start of the year said that any software company or developer individual developer who's developing something that the government defines could be used for a biological or military purpose has to have has to give the federal government, the executive branch, access to all of their algorithms, all of their software, and all of their back door security.

That is an executive order that Joe Biden issued at the start of the year, and they will define, what is biological security, what is to fight the next pandemic? Any of that stuff where they claim, as they've already been funding all that gain of function reshirts, they shouldn't even be funding any viral research. The NIH, the CDC, they shouldn't even exist constitutionally or morally, and yet they do. And somehow RFK Junior thinks he's going to change things

by I don't know. I have no idea how he's going to do it. What's he going to do? Try to stop donations from eventually getting into the people who decide who's going to be appointed at the NIH and CDC. That's not gonna happen. They'll find ways around it. It's

just it's amazing to see what's going on here. And the other thing I want to bring up is, you know, David played that shot that video from Surprise Arizona of the young woman who had had some problems with members of the government and she went to the meeting with

the mayor. I played it on my show as well, and they forced her to sign a document in order to be able to speak for her wonderful three minute allotment to speak to the mayor and the city board, right, So they pulled her away because they didn't like what she was saying, and they escorted her out. In other words, a guy in a costume, a police costume, went and grabbed, assaulted her, and pulled her out in front of her

ten year old daughter. That's the real of it. That's person on person aggression backed by a bunch of other people who claim they have authority over that woman, and she's just trying to say, leave me alone. Well, they not only did they not leave her alone through the government's operations before that, they certainly didn't leave her alone in the room. And this gets us to the big problem of public places versus private places. Public places introduce

in economics what's called the tragedy of the commons. Anything that is not privately owned will see all the people who are forced to pay for it. In this case, government try to utilize the resource the way they want to and to do it before other people do, which then depletes the resource. You don't actually see the actual price being reflected on what people claims the value of it. You can't see people turning to alternatives and turning things

that were mineral sludge like oil into a resource. You know again that term resource only comes about when people realize that there's a really good use for it and it's valuable.

I've brought up before the ancient Irish had the Brehon laws system for a thousand years. Nobody was forced to pay for it. It was a tribal clan system, no taxes. It was done through reputation and exclusion. The ancient Israelites when they fled Egypt for years, they had the tribal system with the elders as the judges before they brought in the king, and they were warned, don't bring in a king. You're going to give up the tenth of

your crops. Your women will be taken advantage of men will be sent off the war for the ideas and the and the agendas of the state. Don't do it. What was the theme for barretta Don't do It? By Sammy Davis Junior, right I the sparrow was the song keep your on the spare row. So, when you've got a public room like that, or we can extrapolate and talk about a courtroom, supposedly you have the right to free speech. Congress is not supposed to write any laws

about that. A lot of people look at these free speech issues saying, oh, that's a First Amendment abridgment by a low locality or a city or something a state. Actually, you're supposed to be looking at the state constitution because Congress is delineated in the First Amendment, and many states had speech codes and they gave money to religious institutions all the way through to the reconstruction era. But if you look at the state of Arizona, it has speech

protections in it. So here's a question. You're also supposed to have the right to do process and a speedy trial, amongst in front of your peers, a fair trial. So what happens if you get into the tax provided government run tragedy of the Commons courtroom. And someone wants to sing when you're on trial. That person has a First Amendment right to say whatever he wants where wherever he or she wants right. But you are supposedly have a protected right to a speedy trial in front of your peers.

So those two can't comport. You can't have a public place and allow for everybody's rights. You can't have publicly run land and allow everybody to see their interests facilitated on the land. It just doesn't work. The government is not a facilitator and protector of rights. The state is an invader and manipulator and manager of rights based on

what the state thinks takes precedent. And that woman in Arizona, in Surprise, Arizona, her free speech rights certainly didn't take precedent to what the mayor thought was more important the operation of the government, and that goes towards anything that they turn into a public place. If people think think that these social platforms are so called the public square, then it doesn't open everything up to everybody being having

a right to say anything. It opens it up to the government managing it because they can't allow everybody to say everything, and then they're going to come up with excuses to say, well, we certainly can't allow everybody to say anything. We need these back doors. We need to suppress and pressure the people who run these companies if they don't allow us the back door to unlock their doors,

because we're trying to protect people. So the state and rights are totally different things, and no state exists to protect your rights. The states can only exist by being parasitic off of society. They are sociopathic. That by definition, that's just lexicography. That's the way it is. That's the definition of it, right it is. And so what we're seeing with this man paval Durov is something that they're trying to repeat all over the place, and it could

become even worse. Want to go into a couple other things on people in the UK who are being arrested on the speech things. And then it looks like Carla couldn't join us. I just checked to see if I get the reply on Twitter while I was playing the Glenn Greenwall video. It looks like Carla can't join us from the Free State project. So we'll talk about this one real quick. I want to go to don't forget that pro piece son of two Nobel Prize piece win

Nobel Peace Prize winners. For what that's worth, you know, given that Obama got one and was it Outgore got the Nobel Prize for science. I don't know what he got or was it for lying? I don't know. But Richard Medhurst is a longtime journalist, comes from a thousand years of families in England. He got detained and arrested under their Terrorism Act for the Protection of Everybody at Heathrow Airport when he returned from one of his trips

on a journalism trip. Also, another person has been arrested, as Roger Waters discusses, she was just released but she's a journalist. British human rights activist and social media journalist influencer Sarah Wilkinson was arrested by UK police on the twenty ninth of August, reportedly over so called content that she posted online. You don't want to collectivize this stuff.

The police came to her house just before seven point thirty a m twelve of them in total, some of them in plain clothes from the again like Medhurst, counter terrorism police. They said she was under arrest for content that she has posted online. Her house has been raided and they have seized all her electric electronic devices. Jack Wilkinson said that he was quoted and on the social media account of Suppressed News, which is where she publishes.

Now let's hear from Roger Waters of Pink Floyd, who has some thoughts on this.

United States weapons and British weapons. They have manufacturing plants in England where people have been protesting weapons in the Middle East, and so kudos to Roger Waters again, great work by him. I appreciate what he has done and those criticisms of him being somehow anti Semitic. I don't understand when you're standing for the Semitic peoples of Palestine, how you can be anti Semitic when you're talking about state policies. What does that have to do with the people.

I don't get it. It's ridiculous. So get ready with some of your comments, going to take a quick break. Hears some of the wonderful music that David has put together and read some of the comments and contributions from people on the David Night Show. I'm Gardner Goldsmith filling in for David, and thanks for being here everybody. I really appreciate you being here on this last day of the month. Don't forget that you can contribute and help

out with the David Knight Show. I really appreciate anybody who is willing to contribute or offer thoughts, and especially if you want to help him get over the hump towards the end of the month on the David Night Show.

in the UK. So as a quicker reminder of some of the things that the UK government has done to people let's not forget what they did, starting in twenty eighteen when they went after Count Dankula. I have my Count Dankula shirt, and they targeted him for simply doing a spoof of Adolf Hitler with his pug. Then, of course the British government prosecuted a retired scientist for holding a sign that offered conversation to people outside an abortion mill.

Man was I believe sixty two years old, and as I mentioned here in nineteen eighty four, the line from Winston Smith, he thinks to himself, nothing was your own except the few cubic centimeters inside your skull. And I mentioned that this man was a sixty two year old retired medical scientist and he was just holding a sign that said here to talk if you want to. And then there were other instances of a woman silently praying

on a sidewalk. They arrested her. British woman arrested for silently praying outside an abortion clinic, as she was honest enough to tell them what she was thinking. As the aggressive cops who get paid on her dime took her away. I believe she just had a settlement from them. Actually, for I think it was eighteen pounds, and there's a lot more that they've been doing recently. Of course the shocking, as I mentioned, shocking Heathrow Airport arrest under section two,

section twelve of the two thousand Terrorism Act. That's Richard Medhurst right there, and there's a great video that he did. You can follow him on an X at rich Eye the letter I Medhurst medhu rst. You'll see me reposting a lot of his material. So if you want to see and if you can't remember it, just head over from my site at guard Goldsmith on X. And then of course there's even more. But here they're saying police are openly bullying people who post information or opinions the

state doesn't like. And Camilla Turner reports for The Telegraph that the Home Secretary of Ed Cooper has ordered a review for twenty twenty five to add extreme misogyny to their possible arrests of people for so called national security. But in addition to that, there is more information about how they're now thinking about reintroducing monitors, actual video monitors, which they had stopped the mass recording of non crime

hate incidents under Keir Starmer. You know, the labor man and I mentioned earlier on my program on Liberty conspiracy. I found a bit of delight in seeing a twenty twenty one video during the lockdowns of a pub own owner in Bath who was telling Keir Starmer to get out of his pub in Bath because Keir Starmer was pushing on the lockdowns. Love the lockdowns. The man said, you're ruining my business. Get out, get out, get out. And one of Kiir Starmer's guards then he was just

a member of Parliament, of course, not the PM. At number X Downing Street. One of the bodyguards was trying to push the guy around in his own pub and the entrance of his pub. Well, it turns out that was the very first pub in which I ate in Bath. That's the very first place where I got fish and chips and mash peas. So now they're trying to expand it. They're going to make it even worse. Let's head into now that might not necessarily lead to arrests, but they're

going to start the video monitoring again. Let's go over to Rock Finn. I want to thank Jhja, want to make sure it got that right. Jja. Thank you Jjeff for your contribution to the program as we head out through the end of the month to help out the David Show. Really appreciate that very very much so, and anyone can contribute live here. I will definitely look for that, and we're looking at Rumble as well. Thank you all inside Rumble for being there. Tony Garrett, Hello, I see

let's see, do not obey. Thank you again, he says, I won't participate in evil collectivism. We have let's see, Tony. Thanks, he says. If you're asked, if you're silently praying, silently answer the question. That's great compelled speech, as Thomas Jefferson would say. And again, thanks to everyone who's watching on x comments. We've got to call Priestess inside Rock. Ben Dougalug is there and thanks for listening, Dougalalug, and thank you for making me feel so at home to you.

I want to thank you, and I want to thank David and Travis and everyone, Karen, everyone who's just been so wonderful. And don't forget tomorrow ten am on Rumble.

Check out the fox Hole. It's a great show. Jason Barker, one of the two founders of Knights of the Storm, awesome, awesome people and let's take the opportunity now to talk about other cool websites and some places that I might suggest to you as we round off this hour of the program, I want to give you a little preview to something we're going to discuss in just a minute. Let's go with a slightly different theme, everybody. Let's start talking about the climate cult on the David Knight Show.

And when we have the opportunity to talk about the climate cult, sometimes I like to play a little something to cool off. I play a little something that is part of that theme. I get the opportunity to go with Cool in the Gang.

because they're not selling. They're sitting on the lot, require energy to keep the batteries going. That's expensive. Their potential fire hazards, as we just saw with the Rivian plant where they were making batteries. I'll show you that story up in Illinois. Terrible fire there destroyed fifty cars in

a parking lot. I am now shying away from parking garages when I go down to Boston because I'm worried that one of those cars maybe got some salt water, or maybe it hits a pothole because the Boston streets are so awesome, so maybe the battery might be ready to explode near my car. Not good. And of course they're super heavy, So how many of those electric vehicles can they allow into parking garages which are not designed for that in the same space with increased weight. So

here's the latest from GM. They're delaying their Indiana battery factory and the latest EV pullback. It's almost like central planning doesn't work.

so he doesn't want them used. Oh wait, I'm sorry. No, it's not that he's upset about car batteries, lithium being mined, all the problems on getting rid of the batteries. No, it's that he doesn't want them to come from China. It's the China boogeyman Rubio and a surprise Michigan Republican car industry. Anyone asked the Pentagon to blacklist the world's biggest EV battery maker from contracts, that would be China. There's Marco. Oh, he's awesome. Yep, just a quick mention

on that one, because he's just full of class. That's great. And of course they're going to get rid of TikTok because China's so evil. Even though it's not owned by the Chinese government, it's owned by a Chinese company. And the United States wants the back doors and to control things like Facebook and already paid off Twitter three and a half million dollars during the lockdown period to suppress speech.

They didn't like, you know the fact that they started up the uh oh Ministry of Truth with what's the name Jankowitz, you know, the singing censor. Yeah, they don't the fact that they fund NewsGuard, which has come after me and other people at MRCTV and taking up hours of our time, even though they send us these letters, right and they say, oh, we have questions about your climate change article, And I was like, well, they didn't click on the hyperlinks there. You need to prove this, like, oh,

I have it, it's in there. I'll show you the study you didn't click on. It's busy work. They send us this stuff to keep us from working on other stuff. So I spent four or five hours on a Friday a couple months ago having to write. Eric Shiner, the head of MRCTV, sends all our replies out, and in my latest reply, I actually challenged NewsGuard and I said, hey, it might be constructive if you'd like to engage in this, we could probably do it for charity. Why don't you

have somebody from NewsGuard engage in a debate. I'll go up there with you and we can talk about the issues. They got no reply. Not only did they not get a reply from them on that, MRCTV found out that they downgraded MRCTV via NewsGuard, the subsidized by the federal government tax money NewsGuard. Not only that, but they also downgrade at MRCTV before they even acknowledged receiving the replies.

That's NewsGuard. They're classic, and censorship is awesome, especially when it comes to dumb things like the climate change canard. That's great stuff. Let's not forget about that Rivian fire, everybody. Here's the Rivian fire. We can talk to Eric Peters about that fire at Rivian's Illinois plant. Damages multiple evs. How about multiple multiple that nothing like keeping it low key, fifty cars, no injuries. Yeah, that was awesome. The fire lasted for hours cause it's so easy to put out there.

It is awesome. Huh. The Rivian fire. And just one other quick one. I think you're gonna dig this. Hopefully this is an interesting one. Yeah, don't forget that. It turns out that the head of the Department of Energy, that being Jennifer Granholm, former governor of Michigan. As I mentioned before, when she was governor, she got six million dollars of the American Recovery Act that was given a GM split off to go to Protera, the bus electric

bus maker. And of course there are multiple multiple municipalities that are now dropping their electric buses because you know, they catch on fire. That there was a double decker electric bus that basically burned for hours in England. It was on a city street. People are like, ah, this is fun. Well, you know, it's kind of hard to heat the home right now, so maybe we could just

you know, go warm our hands over that. That'll be great. Well, she after leaving the governorship and getting that money to pro Tara, got on the board of Protera. I know, it's a shocker, right. Then after she left the board of Protera, they gave her a big stock stock option. And then when she joined the Biden administration, she didn't reveal her stocks on time. That was actually that was actually something for which she could have been prosecuted, and

Josh Holly brought it up to her a while ago. Well, it turns out that she's not alone. There are others who are involved with this institutionalized corruption. As Josh Holly says at the DOE, this is from a while ago, but very good points. As we hear Josh Holly bring this up. Oh, there's going to be an ad, So let me skip over this commercial and just play this audio. We're going to have a blast as Josh blasts this

woman for her corruption. Oh. By the way, the stocks that she got from Protera, as I mentioned on my show a couple of times, she sold them for nearly three million dollars about a month before Portera filed for Chapter eleven government bankruptcy protection. Let's go with Josh Holly, shall we?

people there, and there was actually a libertarian there. I'll give you a hint. He created the borg, so I think you can understand he's not a fan of collectivism. So let's go with that introduction of the mighty mind meld. Because it's almost time for us to bring in our guest, the great and awesome Eric Peters. This is gonna be a lot of fun.

many places for things that people just enjoyed. And you know, there was good and bad about Star Trek Voyager, but I really enjoyed hanging out with a lot of those people. And I love hanging out with you. Eric. It's great to have you here. We had a couple of those stories. We had a story of Ford dropping a lot of it's ev plans. We had the new GM battery thing. We had the battery fire and of course Kamala Harris, it's just water off her back. She's not even thinking

about it. Tell us what your thoughts are on that, and then let's talk about some of the stories at Eric peters Otto's Okay and how to follow you.

bucks and he leaves you alone, right right right. Uniquely, in this country, you've got not just the institutionalized corruption, but this this unctuous moralizing garbage that goes along with it. You know, it's not enough. They can't be honest about the graft. It's like, Okay, we have power, and you're going to give us money, because that's basically the dynamic here. You know, we're actually doing this for your own good.

Tesla created this trend. You know, people constantly talk about how profitable Tesla is, and it's true, but the profitability is based on two things, primarily, and neither of those has to do with selling cars as such. The first has to do with stock valuation, and the stock valuation of Tesla has gone through the group and why because the government has sent out the signal that they're going to force people to buy battery powered vehicles. For a time,

Tesla was the primary manufacture of battery powered vehicles. So, uh, this forced demand for these vehicles is going to increase the value of the company that makes them. There's that. And the other thing that's not very well known is the Tesla essentially founded it's business on extortion via this mechanism called carbon credits. So the government will say to a company that you have to reduce your carbon footprint, that's what they call it, the amount of carbon that

you emit. And one of the ways to do that is to pay Elon musk Ye some money. And what you get then is a credit for you know, for Elon not having produced carbon, and you can then use his credit to sort of pay off the government. And you know, it's just it's astounding. What he has done is to milk the mainline auto industry to finance him.

So it's the first instance that I'm aware of. It's like that wasp that lays an egg on a caterpillar, you know, and then the larva grows inside, yeah, feeds off of it, and then casts aside the husk once it's done feeding on it. He's managed to build his business off the backs of his competition using the government. You know, I'm not a fan of Elon Musk for that reason because he is the greatest grifter rent seeker that I can think of the past one hundred years.

And the second reason I don't like the guys because he postures as a free speech addicate advocate and that's a lot of nonsense. Ask anybody who is on his platform.

So why would I need to get verified, you know, to be on X. Well, the reason is because they want me to pay eight dollars a month to have my data mind by Elon Musk, and I'm just not going to do that.

even comport with the satellite data. And then of course we have the whole climate EATE one and two from the University of East Anglia, the emails that they caught between people saying we're not seeing the temperatures that we want and they say, oh, well, just follow what Michael Mann does. I'm paraphrasing hide the decline.

and I've shown the graph on my show. If you actually look at the graph Al Gore used it in Inconvenient Truth, carbon dioxide increases don't precede the temperature increases on their own graph, it's the temperature increases by eight hundred years that precede the carbon dioxide increases. And yet, you know, so all of that, then they apply, well, it's dangerous to everybody, it's for the public good. So we're going to control everybody, and we're going to apply

this cost of carbon. And that's one of the areas where I have criticism of Donald Trump again because he didn't expose that he just reduced the cost of carbon. It was fifty something dollars under Barack Obama, like fifty six. And then Trump didn't say this is ridiculous, this is stupid, you know, even as he was sitting on the oil in Syria. We're sitting on the oil. We've got the oil in Syria. It's going to be great. We're holding

a thirdin Syria. You know, utterly unconstitutional, you know, Yeah, thanks. I don't have the air for it though, but sometimes I'll have to go as Donald Trump get an orange wig. They'll probably arrest me. They'll probably charge me with something coming out of New York State. You know. But he didn't reduce the cost of carbon thinking. He didn't get

rid of it. He just reduced it to seven. Now the Biden administration has brought it up to sixty one, and they're coordinating that to sixty one dollars per metric ton. It's not killing people, it's not causing the climate canard that they you know, the climate catastrophe, and they're incorporating that through the Federal Reserve system with some of the major banks. The Federal Reserve almost over a year ago directed the banks who obviously are very dependent on the

Federal Reserve. And now the Fed can can directly buy the bonds of any corporation they want, thanks to Donald Trump's move with the Cares Act that was put in there, they can and they don't even have to expose the companies the bonds they're bond. They don't have to expose their bottom line, open up the books or anything. They just buy it. So it's pure corporatism. Fascism, and they are now telling these major banks come up with how

you're going to address the cost of carbon. In other words, tell us where you're going to be investing and where you're not, because you want to be on our good side. And it's exactly what you're saying is you drill down into these with the face of Tesla elon Musk, you start to expose all of these layer upon layer upon layer of falsehoods and crony capitalism that they've established that hopefully we can sort of open up that onion. You know.

became cemented in law. You had these Republicans talking about how they were going to repeal and replace, not repeal period, but repeal and replace because Republicans always have a better plan. But there's always a plan, isn't there.

They understand that for average people, particularly working in middle class people, to have access to affordable energy is anathema to their goal of ultimately creating this world socialist, communist system in which everybody is controlled, and they're going to be controlled by being dependent. Because if you can't afford to heat your home, if you can't afford food, if you can't afford the basic necessities of life, let alone any luxuries at all, what have you been reduced to?

You've been reduced to us, to the state of a surf.

alienated his sister. Paul Kangor has a great book on the madness of Karl Marx. His mother was writing to him saying, what are you doing? Why are you doing this? We sent you a bunch of money, now you want more money. And of course he also decried industry and manufacturing plants when Engles was giving him the money to supply him, to pay pay for a lot of his writing and keep him supported. And that money came from Engles his father's textile plant.

he was too good to work. And yet same time he despised people who did you know, he particularly targeted the middle class, you know, the working middle class, uh, you know, and and and turned them into a pariah class.

this unrealized capital gains tax. And I say, yeah, just like when they passed the thirteenth Amendment and the income tax one hundred years ago, only the rich, only the rich, are going to pay the income taxt.

the start of the Industrial Revolution. As the royal peerage system started to collapse, some of those people got, as I've mentioned on my show maybe on David Show before, they got what we're called special Acts of Parliament and literally the city of Bath, England was basically given to two guys. That's why a lot of the architecture is very similar in the city of Bath. And so I understand that they don't like those connections to what Marks

successfully depicted as free market capitalism, but it's not. It's cronyism. And when you see the ways that markets actually work, the people who are in charge of real markets are the consumers. And so if we have this anti gouging thing with price controls that Kamala Harris wants, or they want to take money from the so called rich to help the poor and all that sort of stuff, what we're seeing is a total disconnect from any logical or moral historical analysis of how markets work. They work by

catering to the consumer. The consumer wants to pay less for his stuff, not work harder for his stuff. And the people who are offering things to people at higher prices are going to be undercut if someone can undercut them, because the consumer wants it for less. So the nature of the market is to conserve resources, not expend a lot more energy to get what you want. That's why we have the simple machines the less for the inclined plane.

It's not that we want to make something that took two people to do, now we want to make one person unemployed. No, we want to free up that person

so that that work isn't as hard to do. So when they're taking money from people who have actually aggregated a certain amount of money for their own wealth, whether it's in their business, and now they've got an extra drag on their business which won't allow them to invest in new employees or R and D or people who have saved and are willing to invest in a real market,

not a manipulated market the way we have it. What they're doing there is they're actually taking away all of that incredibly important benefit, all the incredibly important benefits from productivity. So they're taking away the inclined plane, they're taking away the lever saying, well, we know you've saved out that money and that money could be put to work. Now we're going to put it to work instead. That's what

they're doing. They're redirecting human efforts all the way to the very concept of saving money that individuals could could spend and invest on other things. And they're doing it through envy. They don't want the poor people to recognize that they're actually taking advantage of their emotions.

to the state. So we live under the happy delusion that we are homeowners if you have a home, but do you truly own your home? If the government can come in and say, well, we think your home's worth a certain amount of money, and we require you to send us this amount of money. You owe us money, even though wait a minute, I paid for my house. I bought it from the seller. I paid the seller.

How is it that I owe the government money? And if I don't pay the government money, then the government will send men with guns to forcibly evict me from what I like to think of was my house, and I'll be in the street and the government will seize my property. So it's a delusion to think that where we have home ownership in this country. Now what they're talking about doing with regard to this unrealized capital gains thing, and it's incredibly it's existentially dangerous if this thing should

come to pass. Once they establish, if they do the principle that it is possible to tax unrealized capital gains, they will come in and say, well, last year your house was worth I'm just going to pull a figure two hundred and fifty thousand dollars. Well, a year's passed, and now your house is we say your house is

worth two hundred and seventy five thousand dollars. You have an unrealized gain of twenty five thousand dollars, and therefore this will be considered income, this twenty five thousand dollars, and you will be obliged to pay a tax on that, and it will be a substantial tax, and it will be in addition to the tax that you have to pay on your property at the county or state level.

And what it's going to do is exactly what Marx intended, which is to drive middle and working class people out of their homes so that they become and served, so that they become renters, so that they at best are allowed to live in some sort of a government housing situation, provided you know, they don't offend the party. Yeah, where this is headed?

few things subtly here. But it is interesting because here we had Karl Marx using the attacking the so called bourgeois, which is a derivation from Burger from you know, German feudal days, the royal governor sort of thing pointed by the royalty because locals didn't like that feudal system, and creating a new feudal system. That's exactly where it goes. You know, we've got a new feudal system. You can't have private property. It's all got to be for the

greater good. Well, who's going to run who decides on the greater good? Well, that's going to be a group of people. So what you're saying is people are too stupid to handle their own lives, but a group of people will be smart enough to handle not only their own lives, but the lives of everybody else. And to have that system gained by special interests like the ones like at Protera who were so friendly with Jennifer Granholm.

doing that. So what they've done is they've made home ownership essentially unaffordable now for young people coming into the market. And naturally the young people are angry about that. You know, they're frustrated, like, what's the point Why should i work when there's essentially zero chance that I'm going to be able to own one of these homes? Because you know who's going to come up with a ten percent on a four hundred thousand dollars half. You can't do it.

So the solution, oh, the government will come in that, you know, the government will well, the same government that created the problem. That's how it works. And it's so frustrating to you and I and I'm sure a lot of people who understand how this game is played because we see it, but a lot of the kids coming up they don't see it, and they are per Lenin And I don't mean this in a derogatory sense. They're

useful idiots. Absolutely, they do not understand how they are being manipulated, and they think that they're going to get something for nothing. And what's going to happen is that everybody is going to get nothing ultimately, except for a handful of people at the cadres at the top who have everything. You know, I point out historically, look at the old Soviet Union. Technically nobody had any private property, but Stalin had At Datcha, he.

meowing Hi. She wants to talk to you evidently. Yeah. Well, I love the pictures of your kiddies. Those are those are great, great animals, good pals. I want to introduce the website first of all, so I want to go over show this off to people. First. It's X. The X is at Libertarian car G at Libertarian card g. And then we have a number of items on the site which are great. There's one of them that have already delineated right there, but check it out. It's Eric

petersautos dot com. Eric. Before oh, sorry, before we go into any of those topics on your site, I would like to introduce this story from Cape Cod. You probably saw the information about the wind turbine blade that broke up off of Nantucket pieces of fiberglass, very sharp. I want to show you a little something about this. I'm gonna go down over here in my little notes here and yeah, so okay, so this is the lobsterman, Dan

Pronk and others. There's an article that was posted at Heartland Daily and Dan Pronk is a guy who got into the lobstering and fishing when he was like nineteen years old. And this is the story. Nantucket local slam offshore wind developer for polluting shores. But of course this isn't just the offshore wind developer. They're working with the government of Massachusetts. They're working with the Nantucket government to

supply this energy. And the Biden administration just announced that it is going to be engaging in the largest rollout of wind farms so far. Let me see if I've got this one. Let me see. Umm, yeah, I don't know if I've got it here, but I'll see if I can find it for my history later. But I want to show you some video of this man as he actually went to this meeting, and I showed a little bit of it before. And there's a piece from X that I've got here. Let me see if I

can find it. Yeah, let me see Daily Caller. Oh, this is it. This is it. This is him talking about it in July on X And this will show you what they're doing to their livelihoods. Here here it is.

If you breathe those fumes, the bonding agents that hold this stuff together, you'll get higher.

that you haven't reported. How come it took you called everybody else except for the closest neighbor being us, before we were the last ones to find out. We found out about it online yesterday. That's how I found out about it, looking on the internet and seeing all the shit washed up on excuse my language, washed up on the beach. You didn't wake up to that.

brought this man on and he was phenomenal. So just show you the image, just real quick. We'll probably have that harmless yellow turn turns out the fun from Rumble. But she had him on the phone, just talking. But I do want to give her credit. It's from her show from yesterday, August twenty ninth. People can follow her on Rumble. So this is Grace speaking with him yesterday live.

that's being put out about wind turbines. And there was a town hall meeting on July seventeenth and there was a Nantucket lobsterman named Dan Pronk, and I loved the comments that he made because he was talking about the fiberglass. He was talking about how toxic it is, and he said, if you breed those fumes, you'll get higher than a rat.

valuation for consumers. The guys on hand, who have a private property stake in managing those waters not to over fish, to make sure they can get the stuff to the consumers who want it at a good price. Their livelihoods are dependent on this place being clean. And you can see how even those organizations that don't rely on that specific place for their livelihoods, they're slightly distanced. Even though

they have this goal of keeping the waters clean. They can be purchased or bought out or incentivized to look the other way this time because oh, we'll give you a donation for that project or overall for that project. Wouldn't you like a contribution for this? And it really shows me again how important it is to recognize first the NGO stuff, you know, very tricky to find out what they're really doing. But the local people on hand, leave them alone, they'll manage things themselves.

it's not scientific. It's political, you know, it is the pretext that's being used now. You know, Communism had to adapt because it didn't sell when they talked about the working class and you know, the bourgeois. It didn't work

in this country. So around fifty years ago they started using environmentalism as the new wedge issue Earth Day in nineteen seventy and all this other stuff, and there was just like with the abuse of the working class in England, there was a grain of proof to it, and then yeah, there was a pollution issue and there was a problem. Well, the solution, of course, isn't let's just you know, reasonably

clean up the pollution. It's essentially communism. That's what the that's what they're using now to forward this stuff along. And it's really ordant to understand that. You know, look at the auto industry, which is my ballowik and the thing that I know about. If rational controls of pollution were the criteria, the EPA would have closed shop around nineteen ninety six because, meaningfully speaking, exhaust emissions from new vehicles have not been an issue in terms of pollution

since then. But the public isn't aware of that because the public is told, oh, well, whatever the latest proposal is is going to result in a reduction of thirty percent of exhaust emissions, so they never explain to people what they're talking about is, yeah, thirty percent of point oh something percent. In other words, a difference that's in irrelevance. It's just become a pretext and excuse now to continue

to push, push, push this ideology. Another good way up to look at it is the whole Mother's Against Drunk Driving organization. That's another example. Even the woman who founded that organization has turned against it because it's no longer about you know, hey, don't be a jerk and drink, you know, a case of beer and go out and brib it. In other words, don't literally drink and drive.

Now they're talking it's essentially neo prohibitionism. The slightest drop of alcoholism is now considered drunk, and the federal government, through Biden, has executive ordered that essentially, everybody's going to be assumed drunk until they prove otherwise in their cars. Right, you have to be convicted of drunk driving before you

had a breathalyzer put in your car. Now they're going to have passive alcohol detectors installed in the car to sample your breath or sample your skin or however they're going to do it. And if the thing thinks you've had anything to drink at all, you know, it'll just automatically disable the vehicle.

course of the Foxhole Nights of the Storm. Jason, welcome to the show, and thank you for being such a good supporter. As we bring you in, Jason, I want you to let everybody know how they can find you, and we'll let you say hi to Eric as well. Good men, All all these guys here a great people as well as David Knight. Thanks for being here. Jason.

thanks to the guests that they really help out. So Jason, I'd love to get your thoughts on this too, Eric, want to get your opinions about this here this story city versus country this time, and if you could tell us a little bit about your observations on the Civil War. A lot of people don't know what a criminal Abraham Lincoln was, the concept of so called perpetual union, I

don't get that. But let's talk a little bit about how you see a civil war coming around because of these urban mindset people versus the people who actually want to engage in their own work and drive their own cars and go long distances out in the country. So I just sort of put it all together. Tell us about this piece.

vying for control over a territory. What happened in eighteen sixty one was that the Southern States did not want to be part any longer of this union with the North, very much as the thirteen American colonies no longer wanted to be part of a union with Great Britain, so they attempted to withdraw from the Union, and the war was over the North forcing the South back into the Union at Bayonet Point. So that's the first point. The second point, of course, is that it was fundamentally a

geographic war. You had the Mason Dixon line, you had the South and the North, and you had different cultures, and you had different economic systems, which was a factor. And the same thing is happening now in a way that I think is interesting in that it's kind of the city versus the countryside in that I use my own state as an example, Virginia. If you look at a map, it is profoundly read meaning conservative. It votes conservative except for Virginia, the area around Richmond and the

area around Norfolk. So essentially, you've got this minority of urbanites that are controlling the state politically. Even in California. Most people don't realize that, for the most part, California is actually a pretty conservative state if you excise San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego. So these people effectively have no voice, and this is politically and socially explosive. You know, you've heard the Democrats, and I like to call them

leftists because I think that that's more accurate. You know, the last Democrat was RFK Junior, and he's become a Republican at any rate. They want to have the direct election of the president because they know that if they get rid of the electoral College, there will no longer be an election that matters in any meaningful sense, because these cities will control who becomes the president and they will consistently vote for a leftist and we will be disfranchised.

And at that point, then what do we do, because we no longer have any meaningful way, you know, to have effect change through process. So you know, the question is begged and I'll leave you guys to answer it.

Maybe we're going a little purplish. But you got Kansas City and Saint Louis or on the on the left, really far in the left, and they do drive a lot of politics here. So I don't know how we deal with that. I think it's going to bite him in the butt if we get to the fifteen minute city and they push all urban or the rural people into the urban because then the voice and the balance is going to tip. And Texas is a good example

as well. People moved out of California down into Texas and took that from a deep red state to almost a purplish state now because of Austin and Dallas and places like that. You know, they ruined their own place. I don't know why they can't figure this out. They ruin their own area. Then they moved to an area where people are on the opposite political spectrum, and then they tried to re make the same thing they just left.

we refuse to provide what the cities need? Are they going to come and drag us into colcoy's you know, collective farms like they did in the old Smooth Union. They very well may try to do that, but shy of that we still have a great deal of power and that we can just go on strike and just refuse to fund finance and provide our enemies so that they can enslave us.

But you can get there. But you got to start somewhere, right, and it's getting to know your neighbors. It's getting to know the politicians. I mean, I would love to ask somebody who's running for mayor, who's running for your local sheriff. I guarantee you they don't know because they're focused on the federal thing. Right, need to start paying attention to local, getting educated on that, getting the right people in and

then starting the right movements. Okay, let's start a farm co op around here, Let's get rid of Walmart for a grocery store. Let's start a farm co op and support our local people. And then, you know, energy is the key to me and Guard talked last night, and energy is really the bottleneck, especially when it comes to fuel and electricity. So that's going to be the challenge. I don't know, maybe we could start making our own

ethanol or something. I mean, there's lots of options that we can explore.

you can imagine. One of the things that I don't want to extend the thought on this too far, but in comparing what I've always disliked the city to the countryside, one of the things that I noticed is in the sure inside buildings you get ownership of buildings and property rights and things like that for the buildings, but there seems to be a dissillusion or a reduction in the

concept or understanding of private property. The streets are run by the government, they have politicians, that everybody's packed together, the buildings themselves. You don't feel like you have a sense of privacy. So the very idea of private property seems to me to be at least functionally mentally reduced inside cities, inside urban areas, and they've sort of translated some of that. We've got to control what's going to happen on this city street. We've got to do this

to manage the city. It's all for everybody's good here in the city. They've translated that into zoning and things. Out in the countryside. Where the countryside really, especially in small enclaves of smaller groups of people, not packed in massive populations. You get to know your neighbors fairly well well. You keep the government out of it, and it's person to person contacts, as Alexei to Toddfield tried to explain

to people. And even in the cities back then they would do four square block areas where people would help each other voluntarily, the lions, the four age, the elks, that sort of thing, and indigence was very low. But out in the countryside you really do get to know your neighbors in the less urban areas, and there does seem to me to be a greater at least vestigial recognition of property rights there than the city, which, by its nature I think doesn't really contribute to an understanding

of property rights the way that the countryside does. I don't know if you guys think that that's maybe them off based there, I don't know.

walls except for my fields and my grass. So I feel much more independent, you know, I have much more control over my immediate environment than the guy who lives in the two million dollar condo in New York City. I think the whole dynamic of living in a tightly packed city fosters this attitude, you know, this of dependence and uncertainty because it's true, you know, you don't really you can't grow your own food in your two million I guess you could, but who's going to do that?

You know, And everything comes into the city from somewhere else, and as long as you have money to pay for it, I guess it's okay. But you know, whatever services, I've got a well, even if the power goes out, I've got water. You know, I've got a great deal more ability to provide for myself here in my country abode than I would have in a two million dollar apartment in New York City.

It takes all the responsibility off of you, you know, and and it's kind of convenient, of course, because now we have to work more hours to be able to pay that rent. But when you move into the rural side, there is more freedom, but it takes work.

people in my neighborhood. So yeah, but I wanted to point that out that you know, the lack of responsibility of having to care for property leads to you know, it's convenient, but it leads to control because now you're depending on other people for your daily life.

So then you put up a piece of fence in front of them, in front of the bucket, and again he's going to be wary of that at first, but after a while, the fact that there's food there and he doesn't have to root around for it will cause him to coming back. Then you put up another section offense on the other side, and then one more, and the pig gets used to it, and finally you put down the gate and you've caught your pig. That's what they do, you know, They profer something that's a convenience.

Look at how everybody has a smartphone now. Oh, it's so convenient. I know, I can make a phone call, where I can send a text, or I can take a picture anytime I want to, you know, as opposed to the battle days when you had a landline at home and if you wanted to call somebody, you had to be at home right or wherever. Well, now everybody's carrying around basically their own personal tracking device. You know that lets entities know where you are in real time.

And eventually I'm convinced plan to use to get rid of cash, so that if you don't buy anything, you're going to have to use an app on this phone. Very convenient. You don't have to carry around those bills anymore. You know, it's seductive. They just use this desire that we all have for an easier life to enslave us.

let's make a tap to pay RFID. That's more convenient. Right now, people are loading their card info on their phones and they're smart watches, right, and you could tap to pay. Now they have apps, so or I don't even need a credit card, I could just link my bank account to my cash app or whatever. Slowly, incrementally they're getting us used to it, and crypto is part of that, right, So to get to a CBDC, they have to get people used to the idea of digital currency.

So they've let bitcoin. And I actually think bitcoin is a like, not a sy out, but it's a grooming tool. I think bitcoin was not created by a dude. I think it was created by the government. People got into it, but not everybody can afford bitcoin, so all these other coins come out that are like fractions of a cent per coin. And my last unit I was in, every single person except for myself was playing around with their different cryptos and talking about it. So they've gotten people

used to the idea of crypto. So now, okay, cryptos, we could do transactions with crypto. I don't even need my card anymore. I don't even need to deal with the bank anymore. But you have things like FTX come along, so and FTX had nothing to do with the insecurity of crypto. It had to do with a guy mismanaging the crypto. But everyone started thinking cryptos, you know, not safe or whatever. I think there's gonna be another big event and then that's gonna be what pushes the government

to come take control. Out of convenience and safety. They need to then take control of that crypto, which then is a de facto CBDC.

controlling that as well, one hundred percent. And there was a city, was it in Denmark where they're starting, uh, like a test program for CBDC, Like if you're it's it's for tourists. I can't remember which city it is, but they're starting it. It's special deals. If you get this app, you can get a special extra bounce to

your electronic buck that you get for this city. It's only for tourists and only for the businesses that sign up to it, but it's a test run and they're going to try this in other areas as well.

down and I'm looking around. And normally when you get in a new car, there will typically be a button on the dash somewhere, you know, even if it's an electric car an on button, and if it's not an electric car, there'll be a start button that you have to push. You carry the fob around with you, right, They got people used to the fob because it was just so difficult so taxing. They have to take a key and put a key in the ignition and turn it right, So they got people into this whole idea. Well,

so convenient. You just carry the fob with you and then all you have to do is push the button and the door will unlock, you know, as you approach. The next step was in that Volvo you no longer even have to have the button. The car turned itself on because the fob was present. Now then the question becomes sort of question today, Well, why did and bother with the fob?

and starts the engine. Now, in a connected car, the thing knows you know that you're attempting to start it, and it can be controlled remotely, just like a phone. Have you ever been seen that your phone is in the process of being updated and you didn't ask for it to be, but it's being updated, and all of a sudden, things are different on your phone because some

external party has decided it wants to jitter with your phone. Yeah, that's what we're going to do with vehicles, And ultimately this is the mechanism by which they'll determine when you're allowed to drive, if it's an electric car, when you're allowed allowed to charge, how much you're allowed to charge, and all of that will be tied into some kind of a Chinese style social credit system where you know, if you've been good according to the standards of the state,

they'll allow you to do these things. But if you haven't, of course you won't be allowed.

from a few days ago. But you've got the new feature why speed. You've got a number of other ones in there, that one about the country versus the city, or review of the new Lexus twenty twenty four g x five fifty talking about that Volvo, and then of course down onto the property tax. So many key ones, and of course the shop where you can get the great ba hats. Those are awesome and so is there one that you'd like to highlight before we go that maybe anyone you want to that one that's right here

underneath the house one, the Federal, the compliance engine. I've been trying to get across to people. You may have noticed a trend if you've been car shopping lately, or if you just follow the industry, that that engines just keep getting smaller and smaller and smaller. And why is that? So?

So they turbocharge it and they hybridize it. And the reason they do that is because by itself, this little engine would never be powerful enough to lug five thousand pounds of vehicle, right, so they do the turbocharging and the hybridizing to maintain an adequate power of performance level for buyers who would otherwise be pretty peed off about, Hey, you want me to spend fifty thousand dollars to get a four cylinder engine.

So you know, the automakers are in this rock in a hard play situation of trying to placate the government on the one hand, which continue used to insist the cars get ever higher gas mileage, irrespective of the fact that the market would solve that problem. You know, if people wanted, you know, if they wanted a super high

efficiency car, the market would provide that. And this other boogeyman about the emissions, particularly of carbon dioxide, and I point out to people that ultimately these standards are going to become impossible to comply with, and it's not going to just stop with a four cylinder engine. The next step, and it's already here, three cylinder engines. I had a Buick in Vista, which is a four thousand pound crossover suv. It's powered by a one point two lead three cylinder engine.

I've got motorcycles with bigger engines than that.

It sounds good, Okay, guys, We'll see you later. Boy, good guys, good guys all the way. And wow, you can't beat them, can't beat them at all. And I want to thank you everyone who's been watching here as I fill on the David Night Show. And I want to thank Dusty Dusty Milton for contributing twenty dollars on Rock Finn. What a great way to end the month for David. I really really appreciate it, everybody. I'll be back on Monday, on the holiday, and I hope David

and his family have a terrific weekend. I hope you have just a wonderful, fantastic weekend as well. I'll see you tonight on Liberty Conspiracy at six o'clock and thanks. If you're just finding out about my show and you want to hop over, maybe you're going to check out the video from last night that we put out the show last night, Feel Free. Jason hopped in last night.

We had a great conversation. It was really really good and of course, you know, I'm hopefully continuing the tradition of people like my folks who gave me a real good head start on understanding liberty and also working with good people like Jason, like Eric, like David Knight. So thank you to everybody for being here, and don't forget if you do want to follow David, it's at Liberty Tarrian at Liberty Tarrian on on X and of course the David Knight Show every Monday through Friday here on

Rockfinn Rumble d Live. And of course I'll give you this to go. Of course we've got the Davidnightshow dot Com. So time to hit the road. I'm gonna go with let me see, I'm gonna go with this one. I think the common man I like this to close things off. Thank you to David and everyone. Five minutes over noon we went extra and I'm happy we did. Thanks everybody.

Remember the website The Davidnightshow dot com, remember the nights of the Storm, Eric Peters, and of course if you want to join us at Liberty Conspiracy, look up Liberty Conspiracy and Rumble YouTube well sometimes YouTube, and my ex is at Guard Goldsmith and Rockfann as well. Thanks everyone, God bless talk to you tonight on Liberty Conspiracy.