Fri 26Apr24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show. As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Friday, the twenty sixth of April. Here of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we've got big news. CO two is not a problem. You knew that. I know that. But now we have multiple studies and multiple Nobel Prize winners. We're finally pointing out that the emperor has no clothes. He's got a lot of gas, but no clothes. God, be very embarrassing here. And we're

also going to take a look at the bird fear. It's not called the bird flu, it's the bird fear. We have a upcoming pandemic of bird fear. To kill the cows and to stop the dairy. That's the purpose of this as being hyped on a daily basis, not only by the New York Times and Washington Post establishment media, but also by ex Trump officials who brought us the first unnecessary lockdown in crisis. But we're going to begin with

presidential crimes. Is it a crime for the president to assassinate his domestic enemies? Does he get immunity or is that only for the CIA and big pharma art with that. So, all of the Trump trials that are going on, for the most part, there are a lot of tabloid stuff. It's

nonsense. These legal charges against Trump are for the most part trumped up, and they I'm not going to get involved in the tit for tat the back and forth it is there, especially this Stormy Daniels thing in the National Inquiry. You can look at the headlines and the puns on the Drudge Report. It's there to highlight the character or lack of character of Donald Trump, and

it seems to be working with the independent voters. So there's a political aspect of that for sure, in terms of, you know, trying to make a case that he has interfered with the election. He's stretching that further than you could stretch Gumby. It's ridiculous, absolutely ridiculous, and so we're not going to cover that. But I am interested in these arguments before the Supreme Court, which again has a political dimension to it of course, about immunity

and the back and forth in that. But before we go any further, I'd be remiss if I didn't talk into some shameless plugging. Here we are at fifty one percent for the month, very very low. Super Fay contacted us and she would like to do matching funds today. So we're going to do a lot of shameless self promotion and begging and she's going to match everything on every platform. I really do appreciate her generosity and her husband's generosity of

this. And we've already got one tip on rock fan Greg Talent, Thank you very much, he said, just getting back from a hospital. Oh well, I'm glad you're back. A new A order valve, a quadruple bypass and I'm going to be among the living a little. Well, good for you. It's truly a beautiful day in my neighborhood. God bless you, David, and thank you for your help making sense of this mess. We found ourselves saying, well, thank you, Greg, and God bless

you. I had my father died about the age I am right now, but he had had heart issues his entire life. He had a heart murmur that was not caused by a vaccine or anything like that. They could that. I was just there from the time he was a young man, and it would have kept him out of the military, except it was World War Two. It's like, you're fine, go ahead, and so. But he had he had a lot of issues with blood clots. I created blood clots for him, and he lost his sight in one eye when I was

very very young. I never remember him not being blind in one eye. And he had multiple open heart surgeries. But it was chemotherapy that killed him. Identified cancer and they gave him chemotherapy and that killed him immediately. So I'm glad you're doing well. Greg. Most one of the most dangerous activities anybody can do is go to the hospital today, So praise God that you're out of there safely. So let's talk about the presidency and the Supreme Court.

Can a president stage a coup or is this only something that is delegated power to the CIA? Can the president assassinate his enemies? Or is that only a delegated power to the CIA that we just delegated even more power to on Saturday thanks to our wartime speaker, former conservative until he got power, Speaker Johnson, who immediately became bormire as soon as he got that ring of power. Maybe he turned into bar mirror, which is why they gave him

the ring of power. I don't know, but yeah, we give carte Blanc to this agency. Nobody talks about that, right, Yeah, And I said this for the longest time. You look at this vicious competition going back and forth between Biden and Trump and the persecution of Trump and these lawfare trials and everything. But I said, it's a gamer throngs. They don't really care about us. The justices are not asking if a president can kill as many of us as he wishes, you know, for personal gain or

in an official capacity, which one? Does it matter if you do mass murder with a vaccine poison, Is that part of the job or is that something that is for your private benefit? You know, because the pharmaceutical companies gave you money when you paraded RFK Junior around and started talking about vaccine hesitancy. Oh well, quickly they start showing you with millions of dollars in cash, and you put one of their CEOs in charge of it, HHS,

and he began the fake emergency. So I guess the question from behind Scotis was just just how far is this game of throne is going to go? Are you all going to start assassinating each other? It's okay if you kill the American public It's okay if you lock them down, it's okay if you steal their business. But everybody gets upset if Letitia James is going to steal Trump's business. I say, what goes around comes around. It would be

an interesting exercise in justice for that to happen. Asymmetric justice, but justice nevertheless. And so this was the question. It was going back and forth, the hypothetical, could a commander in chief order Seal Team six to assassinate a political rival and not face prosecution? And of course the answer is no, that's what the CIA is for. We have to we have to compartmentalize the government, the CIA for assassinating politicians. The Seal Team six, We've

got other uses for them. So and then it was you know what what if it's for personal gain versus for official use? Right, and so does the president get legal immunity? We've given legal immunity to the pharmaceutical companies for killing people for personal gain. Haven't we look at the millions, the tens of millions that they've already killed. There's already Uh, you just had an official bureaucracy say, I think it was the who. We'll get to it,

amit? Who? Is suggesting that in a few years the number of cancer deaths are almost going to double. So, yeah, that's any cause except for the vaccine. Why would they say that now? And so, is it okay if he killed people? Is it okay if he kills them for personal gain? Community says? Even if you did it for personal gain, we won't hold you responsible, says Soto Mayor questioning the Trump lawyer sour and so for this is silly side issue here, and it is a silly

side issue. We have the Supreme Court straining at gnats when they swallow the camel of mass demicide through lockdowns, through ventilators, through medical hospital protocols that kill people, through medical martial law, all the rest of this stuff. This is like some bizarro world. They really are straining at GNATS with Trump and all this other stuff when they swallow Campbell's hole. So when he says, well, no, what the president does basically he goes back and he

takes the Nixon line. But when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal by definition exactly. Well, there you go. They didn't need to have this whole discussion. We've already settled this once. Didn't we Richard Nixon, David Frost, Well, when the president does it esth Mahati illegal, of course, he can do anything he wants, right, So that's where we are. And so that also was brought up. Well, if he is in office, there's a procedure that has to take place.

But you know, after the guy's not in office, is he still above the law? What if he resigned like Nixon? Gerald Ford believed that he still needed a pardon, and he took a lot of flak for giving Nixon a pardon, probably cost him reelection giving Nixon a pardon, So why do that if it wasn't necessary? And so that brings up the whole point of what impeachment is for, doesn't it. You know, we never have any prosecutions of a sitting president ever, and so Trump's people were right about

that. But if they are impeached, and remember, the impeachment in the House is an indictment, it's an indictment, there's a trial that happens in the Senate. So the House will look at this, they'll vote decide, well, we're going to impeach him. That's like a grand jury. And if you've got a lot of Democrats you can impeach a ham Sandwiches, to paraphrase the old thing about grand jury's and and so we've seen that. We've

seen a couple of ham Sandwiches impeached in the Trump administration. And then it has to go to the Senate and there's a trial. And so they have somebody that is from the House side that will be the manager, in other words, the prosecutor of that trial in the Senate. And it works the same way in state legislatures. We had Ken Paxton in Texas who was impeached.

He was the attorney of the Attorney Journal in Texas. He was impeached, and then they sent prosecutors from the House to the Senate and they had a trial there. He was found not guilty, just like Trump is found not guilty with his two impeachments. But if you are found guilty, what is the penalty. They take you to Gemo. No, No, they kick you out of office. They kick you out of that's it. That's

it. Because they don't want to have people. They want this determination to be in the House so that you don't have people all over the country like Letitia James and Alvin Bragg shutting down the office of presidency. That's what this is about. They're shutting down the election. You don't want to have politicized prosecutors all over the country shutting down the presidency. So if there really is something there, as determined by their peers essentially in the Congress, then you

remove them from office, and then those prosecutors can bring a crime. And that's why Richard Nixon was pardoned, because even though he did those things as president, it still was a crime. He was very happy to get that pardon from Gerald Ford, even though he said it's not a crime. Well, they said, there seems to be some common ground between you. As they're doing the questioning, there seems to be some common ground between you.

You're calling on the other side that no man is above the law, that the president can be prosecuted after he leaves office for his private conduct. Is that right, said Neil Gorsich. Trump slawyer said, we agree with that. And then the question becomes, says Gorsig, as we I've been exploring here today a little bit about how to segregate private from official conduct that may

or may not enjoy immunity. That underscored what could emerge as a key part of the court's ultimate decision how to separate out Trump's conduct that is protected and under the presidency under a ruling of some executive immunity, and what he is doing outside the bounds of his presidential authority that can be prosecuted and so Amy Coney Barrett said to Trump's lawyer, so you concede that private acts don't get immunity, and he said, we do. And so then she specifically signed

various alleged acts from Trump's push to overturn the twenty twenty election. She said, well, I want to know if you agree or disagree about the characterizations of these acts as to whether or not they are private. Petitioner turned to a private attorney who was willing to spread knowingly false claims of election fraud to spare he had his challenges to the election results. Is that private? And he said, we dispute the allegation, But that sounds private to me.

Then she continue, So petitioner conspired with another private attorney who caused the filing and court of a verification signed by petitioner that contained false allegations to support a

challenge. Is that private? That also sounds private? Said Trump's lawyer, three private actors, two attorneys, including those mentioned above, and a political consultant helped to implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification certification proceeding and petitioner and a co conspirator attorney directed that effort. She said, he said, I believe that's private as well. Well,

then those are acts that you would not dispute. Those were private, and you wouldn't raise a claim that they were official. Sour, the lawyer said, as characterized. So what's this about about buying time? This is about the immunity for these This is not about him being immune from these crimes. What they're trying to do is just play legal games like Biden is doing for the purpose of election. Biden is running these trials to drag Trump's character out

into the open. They are trying to delay these other trials until after the elections. What this is all about, and that's why the Trump lawyers have said, well, we're going to lose this thing in the Supreme Court, but we think we're going to win anyway. Let me read some of the things that are on here. Travis tells me, Handy will be joining Jason Barker on Nights of the Storm tomorrow live at ten am. All good. That should be very interesting. And by the way, Jason Barker and Serge

the Purge released his documentary yesterday. It's on YouTube. You can find his channel at Surge the Purge on rumble Macker seven. Thank you for the tip, he says, Buss you and your family, David, thank you for your wisdom. Appreciate super fe matching today. Very generous. Yes, it is, thank you, and she said you would match on any platforms that doesn't have to just be here on Rumble and rock Fin that's where we'll see the thanks for credit, but during the show. But we can do it

on Zel or cash App. I several people donated on cash app yesterday. I really do appreciate that I can. At least on cash App, there's no way to respond with a comment, but I can hit a heart to like it. On Zel, the only thing I can do is read people's names there. And I want to thank all the people who on a regular basis us on subscribe Star that is. You can't believe how important that is to us. And there's been a lot of discussion by one individual ast too.

You know why I would have that, Well, I have that because I don't do one hour commercials a day. Whenever I was on radio, and this is a standard thing, this is the radio and TV clock. When you're on there's you know, I would be on for like nine minutes, and then I would have like a five minute clock break, and so the radio stations would run their commercials, and then in most of those breaks, and then in one or two of them, the show would run their

sponsors to make money. So that was really kind of the way the revenue sharing was running. It didn't work out that way. When I was at the radio station in Colorado, we'd not set up any sponsors. So I did it for a month or so for free. Everybody thought I was making big money because it's back on radio. It's radio doesn't make you big money. If you've got a lot of stations, it does, but it's difficult for these local stations to even stay in business. So, you know,

no hard feelings about it. It's just that was. You know, I cut down one hour of this show and then there was it was kind of a condensed recap for that one hour with lots of commercials in it because that's the way it has to be done. People have to live, and so they do those commercials. I don't be grudge them of that, but you know, what we do with this is just to try to do commercial free and you know, your support allows me to focus on the news without having

the sidetrack of doing commercials all the time. So I really do appreciate that, and I appreciate the subscribe to our people, even though we have not interacted with them as much. It's just difficult with all the different moving parts here to get there and interact with people on Rumble. Jim Zy seven, thank you very much for the tip, David. I'm thankful for your dedication understanding. Thank you very much of the truth in this wicked world, he

said, rumble no truth in them. Thank you, Thank you so much. Here's fifth dollars towards your new chicken coop and make sure you stock it with plenty of cows. Yeah, he's got to be. Yeah, I had to make sure we keep the little dog out of there as well. He's if they want to call chickens, he's their means silent, silent killer, rapid swift killer. He got into one of our bins and killed half of our chickens when there was still pullets and we had not trained him to

not do that. Scout's good, he's cool, he understands, he's chilled out. But the little guy that we that Travis brought in as astray, he's he's he's full of smunk. On Rock Fan, Bob Coleman, thank you very much, and Jason Barker, Thank you, Jason. He says, thank you to Faye for the tip matching, Yes, thank you very much, Faye. On Rumble Militant Melankovic, thank you very much, he said. David may Good, bless your show and help the best wishes.

Thank you very much. On Rock Fan, Karen b thank you, Rock Fann, Michelle Obaman, thank you very much. David. Play a Christmas song and I will end the war in your grain. There you go, Yeah, silent night. I guess we could do that and going back to World War One. Rumble m Sellers, thank yous, praying for your health, David God bless, thank you very much. On Rock Fann dougalug thank you, he says, thank you David and Crewe, and thank you to

Faye for matching the tips today. Yes, Michelle Obama again another tip. Thank you pour out a little liquor for Joe Biggs. Yes, it's really horrible to see that happen and to know Joe, and I know I haven't talked to Joe, but I know how that eats at him because I know Joe. That's an unbelievably difficult thing, especially for him, especially for what he went through in a Rock and Afghanistan. That's the way they treat people who you know, who support the government's war. They have no they have

no regard for that whatsoever. Let's see Rock fan James Carnevale, thank you very much. Appreciate that. And on Rumble I'm Marty, thank you very much. That is a very generous. I appreciate that. God bless you. Fean All on Rumble Rock Pogo Relation, Nick, I'm sorry if I mispronounced your name wrong. Thank you so much for your great work, David. I've learned so much about politics, how it works, life in general from your show. Greetings from Slovenia to the beautiful USA. Well, thank

you very much, thank you very much. It is interesting to see they do break down where the show gets downloaded and on the on the podcast stuff you're watching it live. Uh So I don't look at that, but it gets downloaded a lot of a lot of different places. It really is surprising sometimes to see how it goes around the world. Back to the news here. So, as I said, it looks like there's a lot of private things here, and it looks like what the purpose of the Trump people is.

And as a matter of fact, they have privately said this to some of the establishment media who's repeated it. We're just trying to make sure that we're going to lose in the Supreme Court. But they're going to send it back to the lower courts to make these determinations before they have a trial, and so that's going to delay this so it doesn't happen during the election.

That's their point. A notable response came shortly after from Chief Justice Roberts when Sauer pushed the justices to remand the case back down to the lower courts to peace through which allegations in the indictment amount to a protected official act un of the presidency and which ones are private. The official stuff has to be expunged completely from the indictment before the case can go forward, said Trump's lawyer. That's the purpose the delay, and they want this to be after the election.

And you know, quite frankly, it's reasonable. I mean that Biden is doing everything he can to have these these election these trials before the election because it is a you know, massive negative ad that's what it is. So the fear of turning the Oval Office into a seat of criminal activity and questioning sour about why the presidents shouldn't face criminal liability for unlawful actions that they take in office. Justice Brown, Jackson and Soda Mayor were the ones who

are really taking the lead in this. And I guess, I guess when I look at this again, you know, the dog that didn't bark is the issue? What about the presidence? Should they face criminal liability for unlawful actions? Are we going to turn the Oval Office into a seat of criminality? The real question is are we going to turn the District of Columbia into a seat of criminality with the CIA, with the FBI and the Department of

Justice. And quite frankly, that answer has that question has been answered a long time ago. Yes, it is a seat of criminality, the district of criminals and criminality. She says, you give president's absolute immunity, it could turn the White House into the seat of criminality, criminal activity in this country. What functions are being given to the CIA and the FBI. SAA insisted that while the president shouldn't face criminal prosecution, they could face impeachment or

other remedies for unlawful conduct. And so the question is, what is the remedy for unlawful conduct by the CIA or the FBI? Is there any remedy for that? Well, not if the President's going to stand by and let them do nothing. As a matter of fact, what if we had here's a hypothetical for you, purely hypothetical. What if a CIA official illegally tortured people and then use those lies to get us involved in I don't know,

say the Iraq War. What should happen under the constitution? Well, evidently the president who knows that should promote her to being head of the agency, which is what Trump did with Gina Haspal. Not a hypothetical. Someone with those kinds of powers the most powerful person in the world. Let's just change that. If an agency with those kinds of powers, the most powerful bureaucracy in the world, with a black budget, nobody's allowed to see anything.

They can spy on anybody foreign or domestic. They can assassinate, they can overthrow governments, they can start wars, they can do anything they want, and they can lie, cheat and steal. And they got classes on it. As Pompeia said, what have we got an agency like that, a bureaucracy like that, and we know that there would be no potential penalty for them to commit crimes. They could run drugs, they do anything right,

no penalty for the CIA or the FBI. I'm trying to understand what the distinctive is from turning the Oval Office, let's say, from turning the CIA into the seat of criminal activity in this country, said Brown Jackson. And so Trump's lawyer says, why, I respectfully disagree with that, because the regime that you described is a regime that we've operated under for two hundred and thirty four years. Well, the regime that I'm describing is a regime that

we've operated under since World War Two, all of my life. And it came out in the open that they could assassinate anybody that they wanted to with AJFK assassination. But this regime has not I've been in operation for two hundred and thirty four years. This regime has been an operation for seventy nine years. Welcome to the fourth Turney. Every eighty years, every four generations, there is a radical change. Now. They are also the ones who are

going to be manipulating this fourth turning. And we're in the final stages of this, this next presidential administration where they will do nothing to reign in the CIA, regardless of which of these clowns is installed by the CIA. That's going to be from twenty twenty five to twenty eight, twenty nine. So, during the questioning of Trump's lawyer, Gorsuch asked him to explain the Trump's team position on whether a president hypothetically has the power to pardon himself. Yeah,

you just do the Steve Martin thing. Well excuse me, and you're done right. Well, excuse me. Their president does it. It's not illegal, and if it is, I'll excuse myself. And so this is one of the funniest lines in it. Trump's lawyer said, well, I didn't even think about that until your honor asked it. We've all been talking about this for you know, the last year, actually longer than that it was before Trump left, people saying can he pardon himself? But sour,

the lawyer for Trump, said, I hadn't even thought about that. Yeah, nice, nice out. He's clever, not honest, but he's clever. Everybody's been talking about that. We've never answered whether our president can do that. Happily, it's never been presented to us, says Gorsic. Oh, yeah, we're not sure whether president can pardon himself. We'll have to decide that someday in the future. Perhaps, so again, will the case be remanded, will it be delayed until next year? Everybody believes so.

Everybody believes that this is going to be what Trump wanted out of this appeal to the Supreme Court and what he's going to get. A majority of the justices seem inclined to rule that former presidents must have at least some protection from criminal charges, but not necessarily the absolute immunity that Trump's lawyers are seeking, because absolute immunity is absolutely absurd. We do give that to the pharmaceutical companies for vaccines, and we do give that to the CIA, But do we

want to extend the CIA's absolute immunity to presidents. I don't know at least president, you can vote out of office. You don't even know who the CIA is most of the time. Most likely outcome might be for the High Court to punt this, kicking the case back to the lower courts for more nuanced hearings, which would be a victory for Trump. Delaying it. There may be five justices who are willing to kick the can down the road,

and that would be an for Trump, at least for now. So we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back of biased and false neooze has become all too common first unfortunately, and this is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is

extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Break free from the usual script with a David Knight Show, a fresh perspective bringing you genuine insights on current events. But if the show is going to stay on the air, we'll need your continuance of sharing the show, subscribing and even just hitting the like button.

All help and if you found our show helpful, please consider donating and becoming a part of a community that values the truth because independent, listener funded news untouched by corporate globalist agendas is extremely important to our liberties. Looking for better information. Apsradionews dot com features articles and commentary along with audio from all the top news from around the world. Apsradionews dot com. W W you're listening

to the David Night Show. Well on rocksand Brian and Dev McCartney. Thank you very much for the tip. God bless you all, David, and thank you especially for sharing your faith in Christ and not backing down. Well, I can't give people the bad news without the good news, and I don't want to leave people hopeless. The key is is that there is something that you can do that is going to make an eternal difference in your life. We need to do what we can to push back against a ruthless government

whose feet are swift to shed blood. But you know we're not. Just that's the problem I had with what the guy had to say yesterday. Just don't go cloister ourselves off in a spot and not even say anything about it. While this continues to go on. We also have to understand that's not where our hope lies, regardless of what happens in this life. I don't

want to leave people so desperate that they set themselves on fire. That's what we had in the Trump trial, a guy who had absolutely no hope except for trying to change things in this world, and when we realized that he wasn't going to be able to do that, he set himself on fire and into his life. So I don't want people in that kind of a situation. On Rock Fan James, thank you very much, and Rumble Delta Mike eighty three eighty four doing a great job. DK Well, thank you so

much for that, and thank you Fay if you're just joining us. Super Fay has offered to help us with matching tips today on any other platforms because we're down really, really low. This is this month, I think is even worse than when PayPal and Venmo pulled the plug on us abruptly, And that was at the time, that was where most people were supporting us. And I know the economy is difficult now not pushed it much. So today we're going to do like a little mini telethon and a lot of shameless begging.

And we've got matching funds from Faye, So thank you very much. Super fact. Let's talk a little bit about the pandemic, because this is building and it is very very concerning what they are about to do. As a matter of fact, Jerome Adams, who if you remember, we haven't heard anything from this guy for about four years, but he was all over the place during the Trump administration. It was Trump's surgeon general. And he's

now saying, well, it's looking very much like twenty twenty. Well that's not a good sign for one of the people who was pushing fear everywhere, fear and lockdown and all these absurd measures. He was somebody by the way that it had been tied in with Pence and Indiana Indiana, and so Pence got him that job as surgeon General's and surgeon general, and he certainly did a job on us and on the Constitution. I had this about PCR testing

of animal slaughter. I mentioned this the other day. This is from Madra. He said, you know, how do you cure an illness? Do you do it by slaughter or by killing the animal? The person or who has one or perceived to have had one of these diseases. It's all lies and hoax so far. He said, death is not a cure for anything.

Mass murder, mass slaughter doesn't fix anything. It does, however, destroy a food supply or a group of people, as we saw with the COVID con though the only ones being killed now are the ones that are ordered to be killed, the birds and soon to be I guess the cattle or they You know, they torched them, they gas them. You can't fix an illness that way, you know, and so do I, it says Madra, But no one else seems to understand this concept of immunity, natural

immunity. You allow the illness to take its course. You treat the worst symptoms, you let it run its course. The animal recovers or doesn't. In the case of this Bolshevik media hype and fear porn, the animals never recover because they kill them. You know it's a hoax when the cure is death, don't you? And we know what the goal is. We saw for the longest time we've been talking about this. Oh, Bloomberg and City

Khan New York and London started this sea forties. You know, City's initiative, and their goals are things like you will have one you have three items of clothing per year that you're allowed to buy. No cars, going to ban cars all together. And of course there's not going to be enough electrician on the grid to drive your electric car because we're going to shut down the power plants as well. You can take one plane flight every three years of

about nine hundred miles, and on and on and on. But one of the key things that was there was no meat, no dairy. Well, how are they going to accomplish that. Here's New York Times with their daily fear report about bird flu. This is the one they published yesterday. One and five milk samples nationwide shows genetic traces of bird flu. Are you afraid? Well, you don't need to be if you read anything other than their headline. Even their subtitle says, well, there's no evidence that the milk

is unsafe. So why you're reporting it. You're reporting it because you want people to be afraid. You're reporting it because you want the dairy herds to be called. You're reporting it because you want the US Department of Agriculture and the EPA to run their little scam and do even more centralized processing of meat and to make everything more expensive and more scarce until you eventually ban it. That's why you're reporting it, isn't it, New York Times. Not because

there's any danger to even the cow. No danger to the cows, no danger to humans, no danger in the milk. But we've found something in the milk. Wow. News flash from New York Times of a paraphrase, it one out of every five milk samples contains a harmless substance that could not be detected without an extraordinarily sophisticated and misused test, the PCR test. They

say, this is the New York Times. No evidence the milk is unsafe to drink, but the survey results strongly hints that this may be widespread. Who cares? Who cares? I mean, they don't care if there's traces of microplastics and the soft drinks or anything like that. Do they We're going to ban the soft drinks? And no, no, we're not going to do that. They want to bandairian meat and so you know what mcguffin and are they going to use that to do that? Well, now it strongly

looks like it's going to be the bird flew. What they're trying to do is they're trying to build a strong consensus of irrational fear. It's going to then allow them to take incremental measures. Right, how do you do this kind of stuff? How do you remove meat and dairy? If you were asked Fauci, you'd say the same thing about how he gets to vaccinate the entire world with an untested experimental vaccine. You do it from the inside, you do it with disruption, and you do it iteratively. Well, this

is the fear part of it. Just like we've seen before. You get people scared to death. You still got people wearing the mask. Didn't scare the pants off of people. He scared the masks onto people, and they're still so scared they won't take the masks off when they go anywhere up in the Northeast. And so you do that, you get people afraid and they

start to incrementally offer measures to protect them from this imaginary fear. Federal regulators have discovered fragments of bird flu virus and roughly twenty percent of retail milk samples tested in a nationally representative study. No details on this study. You notice that how many places did they do it, where did they do it? All the rest of this stuff? What are the cycle threshold magnifications? Are they doing the kind of nonsense that they did with COVID magnifying it by one

point one trillion times? And again they find fragments of a bird flu virus. If it's fragments, are you sure? And that's what it is? They've got this thing hyped up so much they're not even saying that they're finding the full genetic sequence that they're looking for. They're finding fragments of the genetic sequence that they're looking for. Do we know that that's even what that is? Nobody's harmed, nobody's harmed with the milk, nobody's no cows are harmed,

no people are harmed. From where do they find this? Parts of the country that are known to have dairy hood herds infected with the virus, They said, well, those are more likely to test positive. Duh. But still there's no harm. So why do we care? Why is New York Times doing this long article about this? And of course, you know you can subscribe to the very expensive, useless New York Times. As Jos always says, look at the front page, Look at what they're talking about.

Well, I would be happy if they were just talking about Taylor Swift at this point. There'd be a lot less dangerous than what they're pushing right now. Regulators said that there is no evidence that this milk composes a danger to consumers. That's a New York Times. So why did they even write this article? Why did they put this headline up there? Because they believe that their readers are not going to read past the headline, so they cover

themselves in the body of the article. And this is quite a bit. This is at the very end of the article. Read the headline, get scared to death, don't read the article. Regulators say there is no evidence that this milk poses a danger to consumers, or that live virus is present in the milk or the store shelves. Are virus is alive? I mean I've heard that they're not. I've heard they're just a genetic sequence, that they're no more alive than the m RNA or DNA is alive. Does virus

even exist? It is a construct that they can't really see, you know. It is perhaps a way of explaining certain things that they don't understand. In the same way, As I've said in the past, we have models of sub atomic particles. You know, had the neils Bore model that I grew up with. There was like a little solar system. You got the nucleus with the neutrons and the protons and you got the the orbiting electrons and everything. That worked pretty well as a model that helped to explain a lot

of things. You know, you have the the chemical you have the chart of the elements, and you know they're they're organized by you know, how they're going to bond with things, depending on the nature of the electrons and the various concentric shells and things like that. So you know, that was

a model that helped to explain things. And now they have quantum physics that is completely different from that, but it helps to that model helps to explain things, but they can't really observe that either because you know, if you actually go in and try to look at this, you change it, and so you can't really observe it. As one of the founders of quantum mechanics that if you say that you understand quantum mechanics, then we know you don't

because it doesn't make any sense. And that's so contradictory and strange. You've got particles that are not physically connected, they're at a distance from each other, yet they seem to be operating in tandem and other all kinds of weird stuff. And when you look at it, the weirder it gets. So I don't really worry about it. God's got it under control. The strongest

yet that the bird flu outbreak and dairy cows is more extensive. But they just keep But then they'll tell you that no, no bank's been harmed. And then they have a person at a virologist and flu expert at Saint Jude's Children's Hospital. It suggests that there's a whole lot of this virus out there. Be afraid. There's a whole lot of something that is harmless and presents no danger to consumers or cows or anything. But there's a lot of it

out there. You'd say that about everything, You'd say that about the air. Oh, there's a lot of CO two out there. It poses no danger to anyone or to the planet or to the climate. But there's a lot of it out there. Well, actually not nearly as much as these

other elements. But you know, be afraid, be very afraid. Maybe so there's a whole lot of this stuff out there, so what if it's true, if it's harmless, But maybe did it ever occur to this expert that maybe another explanation is maybe not that there's a whole lot of this virus out there, but maybe there's a whole lot of magnification going on in his PCR test. Could that be what's happening? Really, By the way, let's go back and refresh everybody's memory about what Carrie Mullis said. This is

at the time when he was opposing Fauci. The PCR test was seized upon by Fauci to say that AIDS was caused by a virus HIV, and he used Carry Mollis's PCR test that Cary Mollis got a Nobel Prize for to prove that. And carry Mollis said, you can't prove that by using my tests. And I've challenged him. I've said this over and over again. He went to form after form this. I have challenged him to a scientific debate, but he won't change. He won't debate me because he's nothing but a

bureaucrat. He's not a scientist. And then there were a lot of scientists who would have carry Molis on a panel because they believed that AIDS was something else other than the virus. Fauci made it a virus he had he wanted to come up with some kind of a drug or vaccine, and so he made it about being a virus. But again that his first rodeo with a PCR making a fake connection to AIDS was what Carrie Molis was. He was at this clip. Here is a form where there's other scientists who are questioning

Fauci's conclusions. And here's what Carrie Molis had to say about his PCR test. If they could find this virus in you at all, and with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. It starts making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else, right. I mean, because if you can model amplify one single molecule up two subplements, you can really measure which PCR can do.

Then there's just very few molecules that you don't have at least one single one of them in your body. Okay, So that could be thought of as a misuse of it, just to claim that it's meaningful. It allows you to take a very manuscule amount of anything and make it measurable and then

talk about it in meetings and stuff like it is important. It doesn't tell you that you're sick, and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you, or yeah, or it could be featured in the New York Times and all the mainstream media, on and on and on. Oh look, we found a not just a code for this stuff, we found a fragment of it. Absolute garbage, un rumble by his love rights, no eggs or milk in the food bank I volunteer

with for a month. Wow. Wow, And I see this is becoming like an annual ritual for them. Kill bunches of chickens and create a shortage of eggs, watch the price go sky high. But now they're extending it out to dairy rumble, junk silver. Does anyone doubt for a second they're running PCR tests on the latest batch of covid or flu jabs would also detect genetic traces of bird flu. That'd be great. We need to contact Robert

Malone. Doctor Peter McCullough's if they get some of the people who went through that they were able to as as doctor Malone testified, and some congressional hearings just the last within the last week, he said, you know, we got some some of these m RNA shots from Pfizer Moderna, and these are you know, sealed, and we have the chain of custody, so we know, you know, they're fresh, and we know where they were not

tampered with, and all this other kind of stuff. We found these massive quantities of garbage in them, fragments of and all the rest of this stuff. And oh, by the way, these are the kind of fragments of DNA, especially the SV forty. He said, it's only a fragment of the SV forty. We'll talk about that coming up. He says, it's only a fragment of the SV forty, the semi and virus forty notoriously found in the polio shots in the mid century that they were given to kids.

Everybody believes that that was responsible for an increase in cancer rates. And there's some hot mic recording of the people who were running that, scientists behind all that, saying we'll send that to Russia and watch them get bunches of you know, see their cancer rates going up. But he said, well, this is not the full SV forty, but it's the part of SV forty

that actually causes the cancer. You think that's a mistake. And so it would be interesting to have these people get a hold of some modern same people did these DNA tests, have them get a hold of this stuff and test it for bird flu with a pc RT test. I bet they would find that there too. On rumble a Woots, thank you very much for the tip. And also Angus Mustang, thank you very much for the tip. Thanks for all the Knight family does. On Rumble YJ seventy two, thank

you for the tip. Many people have an attitude of don't want to know and don't want to see it. I realized knowledge of the truth will set you free. Thank you David, and thank you super Faye. Yes, thank you very much super Faye. Again, Faye is matching the contributions today on all the different platforms. I really do appreciate it. We are at fifty one percent on the on the gas gauge. I don't know if the gas gage got updated. It's something we delegate to Karen's brother and his computer

was down all day yesterday. I wonder if he had any milk either. I don't milk, eggs WiFi got some free Whiffy. I don't know. But on Rumble emulated void sending twenty dollars on zeal, thank you very much. Rock Fan Jason Barker comments, he said, you're more likely to die from under cooking the chicken and kidding salmonella. That's right, that's right, or at least a bad tummy ache. They don't say anybody got a bad

tummy ache from this milk, or even from working with the cows. So on Rumble Spietro six to six, thank you very much as made this money. Add with the rest to bless you and your family. It really does. Thank you so much. On rock Fan Guard, thank you. Guard. Appreciate the tip from Mother Russia to you because if you push back against the war, you are a Russian right now. That's that's what we are. Thank you for spreading the Russian propaganda. And watch out for the Larry

bird flew. Yeah, the big bird bird flu How about that. I don't think big bird ever flew. I hear PCR tests can find it on virtually anything, and it can only be cured with a three point shot like Larry Bird. Thanks to the super Fay for thanks the super Fay for matching. Yes, thank you very much. And finally on Rumble Junk Silver, thank you very much, says thank you super Fay for matching today. Such a blessing to have three hours of decay listened to five days a week.

Well, thank you very much. So let's talk about you know, it's not just the New York Times, It's all the mainstream media pushing this bird flu stuff. Here's the way, Business Insider, another hack publication is doing it. Bird flu could jump to humans any day. They got a scoop, they decided they would go back and talk to Jerome Adams, Trump's surge in general, which nobody else sauld talk to him for the last four years. Well three years after he gets out, he says that it feels like

twenty twenty again. Well, I would say it stinks like twenty twenty again. I think Jerome Adams Trump's fearmonger extraordinary. I think he did everybody's a good a job as fauci or doctor Scarf Burks. Former Surgeon General Jerome Adams fears he fears and that fear is so contagious. He fears the US is making the mistakes of twenty twenty all over again. Well, me too. I absolutely agree with him. He's one of the mistakes of twenty twenty.

Business insiders talking to them, I do believe that we're going down this path. It looks very He was not the surgeon General, but he was the It was general fear, we'll call it. This is general malaise, this general fear that the Surgeon General was stoking heavily and people of his ilk. It has and here's what this outbreak has killed. Tens of millions of birds, says business insider, an absolute lie. The government has killed birds after

one of them tested positive. I mean, you know, that's what they had to go in and call the entire thing, even if and I don't know that any of them have died, but you know, if you got one bird that dies of disease, do you kill all of them? Is that our new standard now? Because if it is, we won't have any chickens or cows. And I think that is the point. But you know, just like COVID, people are not dying of COVID. They're dying from

the ventilators. They were dying from rem dezevir, they were dying from negligence and many other things that they were doing. And now the birds are dying from being gassed. We've gone from ventilators to gassing. I wonder when they're going to try that one on people. That's been done before, hasn't it so. Fragments of the virus discovered in grocery store milk on Tuesday suggests that

the outbreak is more widespread. It's like they're reading a script. I wonder who it is it's giving them these press releases to write, you know that the Business Insider New York Times are doing. Is this coming from the CIA? Is it used to in the past they have? You know, is this the mocking bird flu? With the operation mocking Bird Flu? Now one in five harmless things are found, and then they will always have the experts. These must be the people who gave them the lies. The experts say

that drinking pasteurized milk is probably still safe, probably still safe. So just don't have any of that raw milk. Oh, be afraid, be very afraid. One human in Texas has tested positive and that person's only symptom was I readness. This is not even pink eye redness. I mean I get that from smoke. I get that from staying up late and reading. I mean, so we call all the cows because I get my I guess a little bit red if I strain it too much. This is one human tested

positive and had a little bit of eye redness. Can you just just imagine what this scene looked like. Oh, we got a positive here, We're ready to believe you, birdbusters. And so they come in. It's like, can you see anything about this guy? Well, I think I see a little bit of redness there in his I pull down the lower lid. Oh yeah, it's red. It's redder there when we pull down the lower lid. These people are just going everywhere with a microscope trying to create a

problem. Folks. We got to stop this fear. We really do, and I think on a positive basis. The person the only person in Congress that actually seems to pay attention to anything is Thomas Massey. And he was talking a while back looking at this persecution of Amos Miller, the Amish farmer up in Pennsylvania, and of course that was being rolled out to a large

degree by the state Department of Health and Agriculture. They were persecuting him with that, but to stop him from being able to process meat that he has raised on his own farm, on his farm. And so he's got the Prime Act and he is already there in terms of understanding how dangerous it is to tell people that you may make it illegal for you to process your own

food. And that has to stop. That has to stop. I mean, you know, they're going to treat people who raise a cow and process it if they don't take it to the US Department of Agriculture's meat processing place. You can be treated like somebody shot a bald eagle. You know how prickly they get about that kind of stuff. I haven't shot any of bald eagles, and so, but you know it's that type of thing. You killed, You killed it on your own, you didn't take it to us.

Doctor Jerome Adams, a former surgeon general and director of Health Equity at Purdue University, is getting deja vus. Me too, me too. He's the guy who helped to spread fear to lock down everybody without anybody being sick or dead in twenty twenty, and so to him, it's looking the same and it is to me as well. No, we got a pandemic without anybody being sick or dead. He says, if it keeps spreading in animals,

then it's eventually going to cause problems for humans. How well, he actually tells you either because we don't have food, because they've got to start exterminating flocks, that's it, or because it starts to make a jump into humans. We were I had to make a jump into humans, and you got a little bit of eye redness. Maybe even if that's related, even if it's real, that's it. But the real problem is the thing that you mentioned first. If they use their go around with their little PCR test,

they're going to start exterminating animals everywhere. It's the government always coming after us, trying to starve us, trying to impoverish us, trying to enslave us. Yeah, you know, so here's a choice that you're faced with. You know, either we're going to exterminate all the animals that we eat our food supply, or you might get pink eye. Not even pink eye. I mean it's not even they didn't even say it was conjunctivi itis. You got a little bit of redness in the eye. I don't know which

one would you choose. It's kind of like the MMR shot. Would you like to have autism the rest of your life and many other issues, or would you rather have an itchy condition for a week or so as a child and then you've got lifetime immuty. Which one do you want? Well, we're not going to let you choose. It's really going around. So as president of Trump, they all got to get vaccinated. Oh yeah, really, see that's it. Not that there's anybody harmed by this, not that

anybody is dying from this. All of these so called measle outbreaks so they've had with vaccinated people. They haven't claimed that anybody died. I never ever heard of anybody dying from measles. Everybody I knew got measles. We all got cold, we all got flu. You know, people die from the

flu. I never heard of anybody dying from measles. So Adam's fears that the US is repeating many of the mistakes that made in the early days of COVID nineteen Me too, me too, And the fact that doctor Jerome Adams one of the big mistakes of twenty twenty is now back, I think that underscores it. Who is in charge of the animal pandemic? Of an animal pandemic in the US? Asked business insider, Is it the CDC? Is it the US Department of Agriculture? Is that the FDA? Well, the

answer is sort of all of them. So that means that any single one of these power crazy bureaucracies who want to for their own sake of grabbing the limelight of increasing their little fiefdom, any single one of them could do this in the same way that we see the attacks on our food supply and on power. You know, you got the EPA as well as another agency talking

about how they want to register and shut down cattle as well. I mean this is not just there's multiple prongs being of government, multiple agencies for multiple mcguffins, you know, the COVID mcguffin or the climate mcguffin targeting cattle got to starve people. So the answer is all of them, all of them. For example, Adams says that he hasn't changed anything about his diet since pasteurization and proper cooking procedures should kill any of the live virus present. Again,

are viruses alive? I thought it was a code. I thought it was a code like a and again it is an abstraction. Are there even viruses? Yeah? Like I was saying before, we have models that help us to do things. We have models of the atom, we have models of quantum mechanics and things like that. Are either one of those correct? I don't know. Are there models of virus? Is that correct? I

don't know, But I've ever seen that they're alive. But he's saying they're alive and you can kill these You know, you can kill bacteria is a lie. And you can kill bacteria by heating it up. You can kill the good back and the bad bacteria, probiotics and all the rest of the stuff. You can kill all of that by heating it up, by pasteurizing it. But are the viruses alive? It's so confusing when they don't know,

isn't it. Yeah? I just get confused when we've got experts who don't know what they're talking about giving us contradictory information about all this stuff in so many different ways. He compared it to the development of the COVID vaccines. He said, when people distrusted a process that they didn't understand, you think that we've got more trust in this now, Boy, this guy is dangerous and stupid, isn't he? He said, the public needs good consistent

communication from the White House and from the USDA. Now what they need is good consistent propaganda and fear mongering from the White House and the USDA. Rather than consumers. The people most at risk, he said, our agricultural workers or anyone with a close or prolonged exposure to chickens or cows. Do you see how this is going to roll out? Can you imagine? First? Pretty soon we're going to see farm hands out there dancing on TikTok with professionally

choreographed stuff and you know, drone and Dolly shots, professional choreography. It's coming already, I just know it. And they're probably going to tell all these poor farm hands you can't have your job unless you get vaccinated for bird

flu. Or they just go out and kill all the cows. Maybe that's it, so, he says, in those groups, because we don't want these people to get a little bit of redness in their eyes, you know, we'll have to kill the cattle or vaccinate them and the cattle, he said, we need a testing strategy that is proactive and allows true surveillance.

I think they've got that already because again the testing, the PCR testing is going to be combined with an ear tag, and the ear tags, I point out to you, they're very they're just putting in the infrastructure for it.

They have banned cattle from dairy cattle from being moved across state lines and so and then if you want to take them to one of the processing plants, and I am guessing I haven't looked to see how many processing plants are and where they are, but I'm guessing that not every state has a USDA approved official, you know, processing plant, so you've got to take them

across the lines. So they're going to put these RFID tags on all of these cattle, and they're going to track all of their movement and their vaccine history. And so if you don't have if you violated the travel regulations, if you don't have the appropriate vaccine passport for your cattle, then they may just kill it and just throw it away and not allow you to have the meatback. I think that's the way they're going to do this. It's all

about the central control, the centralized processing inventory and tracking of everything. They want to add every single cow and chicken to their inventory of things, just like they want to add each and every one of us and every one of our appliances and our cars are all part of their inventory of things. So the dairy cattles must be tested for this before they moved across state lines.

That's just the beginning of it. And I would imagine that these state departments of health and in the areas where even if you're in a state where you don't have to go across state line to do with the dairy cattle, or if you want to take them to market for meat, still within the state, in those places where they do have a USDA facility in the state, they will probably say to the state department that they have to be the department of health in that state, that they have to be the ones to track

all of this stuff. And if you don't do it, we'll probably just shut down that USDA plant because we don't need that many of them, right. It'll be the kind of arm twisting that's going on. I mean, Biden is back now twisting the arms of states over printal rights and the trainee stuff in schools. With more money FIAT money from the Department of Education. It never ends, and that's the way they always do it, Just like

the lockdowns of COVID nineteen. We're devastating for the restaurant and the hospitality industries. A crackdown on bird flu can be devastating to the chicken industry and to the restaurant industry, and to the grocery store industry and to our ability to eat. So who knows, if they get their way, we might have in the twenty thirties, we might have a politician running on the campaign like they did was in the twenty thirties and the nineteen thirties. I think that

they ran a chicken in every pot? Was that FDR. Maybe that'll be something that we go back to in an aspiration again. Yeah, we don't even think about chicken. It's all over the place now, but yeah, a chicken in every pot. Wow, we would be so wealthy if we had that. Well, they're going to take that away from us. The government giveth, the government taketh away. I guess we're seeing the same tension

between business interests and public health interests, said Adams. And of course we know that he doesn't care about business interests, and he doesn't care about the needs of consumers or individuals either. When they locked down everything, it wasn't

just stating for restaurants and hospitality industry. We couldn't get food. Remember, the grocery store shelves were empty because of boneheaded people like Trump and Jerome Adams's surgeon general who said, you're going to shut down the restaurants, and so they couldn't deliver the We had food being destroyed on the farms while the grocery store shelves were empty white because it wasn't in a format that they could sell it in the grocery stores. They couldn't accept it. It was a format

that was set up for restaurants only. Same thing with toilet paper. You know, plenty of toilet paper, but in the wrong format. And so yeah, there's a conflict between he says business interests. Now, this is our personal interests. This is our individual rights. Jerome Adam that you Adams, that you don't care anything about. And so his attitude is just, so screw your food. I don't really care. My concern is we keep making the same mistakes over and over again because we focus on the wrong things

instead of focusing on the root causes. That's right, that's right, making the same mistakes again, people like Jerome Adams. Going to people like Jerome Adams and asking him for advice. We keep making the same mistakes over and over again, you know, mistakes like Jerome Adams, mistakes like Donald Trump, mistakes like Joe Biden. We keep making those same mistakes over and over again. They don't appear to learn anything from what we have been through.

Well, the Biden White House has just signed on to a new Gates funded pandemic surveillance plan Rights, the Children's Health Defense, the Pandemic Fund. It is a he anounced us on Tuesday, a fifty country partnership to combat future pandemic and a new pandemic fund. And it's got money coming in from big corporations, because that's how the global governance is funded is by these big multinational corporations and the people like the Gates Foundation, the Bill Gates Foundation. So

they released a sixty four page document detailing this program. Partnership said it aims to strengthen global health security to prevent, detect, and effectively destroy all the cattle no respond to biological threats wherever they emerge. We've got to be prepared for disease X because disease X is going to get us all. That's the way they the fear that they push out there, and of course we see that kind of fear being pushed by Alex Jones as well. If be afraid

of disease X, how many times has he done? And many people in the conservative media, how many reports have we seen about disease X. Disease X they're going to get us this time. Boy, we narrowly escape that gain of function the last time for the Wuhan Lab. The disease X is the way they're going to get us. The WHO is not backing down on his pandemic plans. As we knew. There is no major victory for freedom because we've now had the International Health Regulations the i HR released this last week.

Although some changes reports expose a news. Although some changes have been made and some wording has been moved around, the World Health Organization's plans are the same as they were before. This week. From the twenty second to the twenty sixth of April, the eighth meeting of the who's Working Group on the i h R is convening and all of these doctor who's are fantastasizing there. Uh, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.

Bias and false news has become all to common first unfortunately, this is extremely dangerous democracy. This is extreme dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This

is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Break free from the usual script with a David Knight Show, a fresh perspective bringing you genuine insights on current events. But if the show is going to stay on the air, we'll need your continued support. Sharing the show, subscribing and even just hitting the like button.

All help. And if you found our show helpful, please consider donating and becoming a part of a community that values the truth, because independent, listener funded news, untouched by corporate globalist agendas, is extremely important to our liberties. Interested in a curated list of the finest classical music, find it now at APS Radio. Now we are having kind of a little mini telethon today and Super FAE has agreed to match contributions, and so I really do

appreciate that. I really do appreciate the contributions. Let me read some of the names of people who have contributed while we've been talking. Let's see we've got on rock Fan Michelle Obama, thank you again for the tip. That's the third one I've seen me today. Thank you very much. I appreciate it. On rock Fan Diana Phillips, thank you, and she writes, shamefully, being a new mother in UK, I didn't eat beef for two

years during the mad Cow debacle. The scare mongering does work on the distracted and the naive. Yeah, yeah, they can. I mean I've I've bought when I was a college student, you know, I used to buy into some of that stuff as well. Never bought into the climate change thing, but I would, you know, they it's just the persistence and until I think the key thing though, is that once you realize that they lied to you and took advantage of you, that's it. You're done, right.

I think most people after the first rodeo, they don't listen to that anymore. So, Yeah, hopefully the mad cow syndrome may come back. To save us from artificial intelligence. I've talked about that before. Once the AI starts consuming other AI than it starts to be, starts to get into a cannibal type of thing as well. But yeah, they overfear manga with all of that stuff. On Rock Fin Papa C T two g thank you very much and writes thank you your family and your wonderful supporters for everything.

Yes, thank you all of you. Thanks me to God. I've been reading C. S. Lewis's Weight of Glory and I like to paraphrase something that really struck me. He says, we're all immortal beings and we should treat each other as such and take each other more seriously. Think about how our eternity will be spent an everlasting splendor or immortal horror. Love Charles,

thank you. Yeah, that's right, has said and may have been in that in that same context there he said, every person that you see on the street, it's really sobering to think that one of them, that each and every one of them, will either become transformed in some being that is so amazing that you'd be tempted to fall down and worship it, or something so horrible that you couldn't even look at it. And that's where we stand in this juncture. All of this other stuff is very important. How we

live our life is very important. How we make money is very important. We need to support ourselves and our families, but we don't want to love it. We don't want to make it the principal thing in our life.

And so that's when we talked yesterday about the Christian nationalism and all the rest of the stuff that a pastor was absolutely right to criticize so many people for putting politics at the same level of these eternal questions, or even above it, or to even turn political partisanship or the following of a celebrity politician into idolatry. You know, we're always looking for things that we're always tempted to

make too much out of everything. You know, as it has been said, the heart is an idol factory human heart, and we have to be careful that we don't manufacture idols in our life. So there's all these things that are good and necessary, we just don't want to make it everything.

And it's good and necessary to understand that people are going to try to steal our food, that they're going to try to impoverish and enslave us, because we need to be able to prepare for ourselves and for other people and help to defend them from that fraud. There are a lot of people out there that are trying to harm us and everybody in the society, and we ought to understand that they're just like some kind of a snipe that is on top

of a building. And so we need to not just turn away because it's difficult to look at, or because we think that there's not much that we can do. Even if we don't have the ability to take out that sniper. We don't have a gun or whatever. But you know, we can at least warn people to say, don't go down that street. Trump is up there shooting people, or Biden or Jerome Adams. They're trying to kill you up there. You know, Cook hear those people. Watch out for

them. Let's see where did we leave off. Yeah, there we are on rock fan a Syrian girl, thank you very much. She writes, the fact that none of the people responsible for the COVID murders has been punished means that they will all be back, not just Jerome Adams. You're right, not just Trump, not just Joe Biden. All of them will be back over and over again. And the agencies they got away with it, they are all more powerful. You know, what does not kill them makes

them stronger, doesn't it. So. On Rock Fin random guy, thank you very much. That is very kind. I appreciate that. Thank you very much, Random. I appreciate that. On a first name basis there On Rumble Stealth Patriot, thank you says, here's a little extra to add to what I give each week. Yes, I see your name there frequently. I know the gas gauge needs a little filling. Thank you for your

hard work. David Well, thank you, appreciate it. On rock Fan, Spencer DeLong, thank you, he says, Hello, David Well, this isn't much. I hope it helps the gas gauge everything does. I appreciate that. I wish I was able to give more as you deserve it for the hard work here in the Night family put into the show. Thank you for all you do. God bless Thank you very much. I appreciate that. On rock Fan MJ, thank you, thank you for all your hard work. Thank you, MJ. And on Rumble b Turner one seventy,

thank you for the tippy. So I always get a good laugh when you talk over the video clips that you play. Well, I hope it don't do it too often so you can hear the video clips on Rumble and sixty one. Thank you for the tip, and he thanks us, and thanks super Fae who is matching the tips today. And thank you very much, super Fane. Really do appreciate that. It's very kind of you.

So let's talk a little bit about the pharmaceutical fraud here. And as I mentioned this yesterday, this idea of a universal vaccine that the headline says a new vaccine could protect against any strain of a virus, which just one shot. Do you really believe that? I mean, it sounds very, very very absurd to me. Before I get into this, we've got another couple. There were so many comments on here. I didn't see all of them on Rumble Michael de Silvio, mcguffin, after mcguffin, after mcguffin, after

mcguffin. That's right there. They're everywhere. And now we're back to Hitchcock's the birds right on Rumble River Gambler. Are the amish taking applications? I'm ready? Yeah, they you know, they got that right. I always wondered, you know, why did they stop where they stopped? As I said before, we've had dealings with we've we've we met some people who were minna night literally literally ran into them or they ran to us. And a car accident. Then we got to know him and uh and hired them for

some stuff. Said yeah, you know, not to pass. Well, just you know that's what you He was out there doing some work and saying, well, you know, we need some work that's not much damage. Let's just if you want to come out, we'll apply that to some work that we need to have done when we were in Texas and so, uh, we got great workers, honest guys. Is amazing. And then there was the guy that was there was a car accident and then he knew an

older guy who had a bobcat and that was his thing. He cleared land with a bobcat. And I mean he you know, if he got in and he had a situation where it got tangled up into some trees and some shrubs and stuff, and it took off a hydraulic hose, and you know he's there fix he's capable of fixing it all. And that was really the whole thing about the Amish. I went back and looked to see why did they stop it where they stopped it. Well, they stopped it at that

point because they wanted self sufficiency. There wasn't anything special about, you know, they just didn't want to get with, you know, go to cars because that was going to make them dependent on outside sources for parts and things like that, which you know, as you look at it now, with three D printing and some things like that, that might actually be something that

we're going to need to have in the future. If we have Amish communities, we might be able to have three D printed parts so we could keep the cars going. But that that was the wisdom of what they did. I don't you know. I always wondered about that. But they wanted to have self sufficiency and not be dependent on people from the outside, which means that they don't have to get the shots and other things like that. Rumble

Shoveken three twenty one. I'll never forget how Fauci went from saying that mask weren't necessary to recommend that you work two or three at the same time with a smirk on his face. Yeah, and that picture of him sitting there in the baseball stadium with his mask down in his chin. What a fraud, Anthony fraudchy rock fan Angus mustang, thank you again for the tip.

I appreciate that. And on rock Fan, mister Chanell, thank you, he writes, I'll start trusting the politicians again when they complete the simple task of cutting down the mightiest tree in the forest with a red herring. He didn't say red herring. But they got plenty of red herrings out there to distract people, don't they With a herring? Yeah, that would be interesting.

But we do have red herrings all over the place. And so let's talk about this vaccine that proposes to be the universe old panacea for every disease. This is the University of California. I began talking about this yesterday, but I didn't get an important part of this. I wanted to revisit it. University California Riverside a new RNA vaccine. The colleagues and this guy and his colleagues are so excited about the experimental and allegedly universal shock and it's got

a very broad strategy, they said. It's been put forward in a new paper and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Broadly applicable to a number of viruses, broadly effective against any variant of a virus, Safe for a broad spectrum of people. Well, there you go. It does everything it is. You know, it is effective as a panacea for everything, and it's totally safe, well, at least for a broad spectrum of people.

You might wind up on the autism spectrum if you take it. But he said, this could be the universal vaccine that we've been looking for war in traditional monoculation based vaccines. Uh, they had, there's a dead version of something in or a modified live version. They say, well, again, that brings up the question, I have our vacs our viruses alive or dead? Is there such a thing as a virus either? But here's the new candidate, however, does not revive, does not rely on your body

responding to it. And see, this is one of the logical fallacies of the lies, the fact she was telling everybody. You know, if you've had this COVID thing that he was selling, if you've had a cold, and we'll call it COVID and you've recovered, then you still don't have a muty unless you get the vaccine. Remember the arguments between him and ram Paul, And it's like, wait a minute. If you recovered, that means that your immune system defeated whatever it was that you're exposed to and is now

trained for life. That's one of the miracles of what God has created in us, that is an immune system. Somehow these you know, single sell things, or maybe they're not single cell, but you know, somehow these killer T cells and the rest of immune system can remember a disease and can take it out. And that's the whole theory that the vaccinations were based on in the first place. And so if your body has already been trained with

the actual thing, you don't need to go back to basic training. You know, you've got a marine group out here and they've been in they've been fighting in the jungles of Vietnam for the last year. You're going to send them back to basic training. It probably shoots you if you tried to do that. But that was the nonsense that Vauci was trying to sell everybody. Oh no, that doesn't work. You know, your your immune system doesn't do anything. It's the vaccine. Now these people are selling. Guess what

the same lie. This new vaccine does not rely on the body and its traditional immune response. Instead, it uses small, silencing RNA molecules. What is that which our bodies create naturally through a process known as RNA interference or RNAi. Oh, so we're going from m RNA to RNAi. So they said that while viruses typically block out the r in AI process, additional molecules could cause viruses to mutate, so they can't do that, all right,

So this is not about training your immune system. What this is about is mutating the viruses or the pathogens with you know, at the at the DNA and the RNA level. What could possibly go wrong with that? You know, we're not gonna We're not going to train your immune system. Instead, our new theory is we're just going to start genetically modifying what we're looking for. That particular disease, it's going to go around, it's going to start

genetically modifying it. Don't worry, it won't genetically modify anything else that finds in your body. Just that particular disease. You trust. That unbelievable what these people are coming up with. It's to the point where we're just going to have to say, you know, don't want any of your bioengineered food or your bioengineered medicine or this other. But by the way, you know, we after we aired that clip yesterday about Aldi's, a woman goes in

and says, oh, this bioengineer that put down that package. But Karen started going through the pantry and it's like, I never saw this before. Look, it's on this one, is on that one. Several things there that we found and threw away, you know, prepared food, processed food or something. And it's become a new category. When I looked up this new category anything that uses corn or soy or being oil or anything like that, you know, and pretty much all of those are now genetically modified.

But it's just a catch all phrase. They don't want to have you on the label. They don't want to put out their GMO, corn, GMOs, soy, gmo, this gmo that. They just put it all in one category thing, bioengineered food products. So we'll be looking at our labels much more carefully now. You may want to do that as well. So he said, if we make a mutant virus, they cannot produce the protein to suppress our RNA I we can weaken the virus. Okay, so here's

a strategy. We're going to genetically modify the virus or whatever it is that we're trying to stop and sterilize it. But don't worry, there'll be no side effects for you or anything else in your body. People are crazy. While viruses obviously mutate rampant ley, the researchers say they don't believe the pathogens will be able to circumvent this new still unnamed vaccine. Viruses may mutate in

regions that are not targeted by traditional vaccines, he said. However, we're targeting their whole genome with thousands of small RNAs and they can't escape this. Well, can you? What makes you think they're not going to be targeting your genome? Researchers believe that they'll be able to cut and paste their vaccine creation strategy and use it for everything from influenza to COVID nineteen, even dingy fever. But what about bird flu? They have yet to test the shots

in humans or birds, I guess. But who needs tests? Right where we're going. We don't need no tests on rumble. JJ Taylor, thank you very much for the tip truth breeds liberty. Our Lord bless you and keep you. Thank you very much. I appreciate that this is sent to me by Mike, a listener, and it was a good reminder. I remember when this happened Herman Kane, when he died in the hospital. I

said, yeah, well, we couldn't get any information much from them, but eventually found out. And thank you for reminding me of this. He died while on a ventilator or did he die from the ventilator? Right? From what we now know, Herman Kane, Herman Kane, And this is a CNBC article that was done a couple of weeks after Herman Kane died, and CNBC says Herman Kane had been put on a ventilator and was at times

unconscious during his final weeks hospitalized with a coronavirus. A Top eight and friend of his told CNBC said, we were trying to use the ventilator to strengthen his lungs, said the hospital, right, is that what it does now actually blows along out. According to pulmonologists and other people who were talking about, you know, kills like ninety percent of the people that they put it

on. The seventy four year old Cain wasn't conscious the whole time because he was on a ventilator, which was something we weren't telling you at the time because we didn't think there was any reason you needed to know. The family just didn't want to discuss it in that much detail. So he died with a positive PCR. So he died from COVID right now, he died to the positive PCR and from a ventilator, I think we can safely say now. And it's sad because you know, it was again, people didn't want

to talk about what had happened. Nobody was comparing notes at the time for the most part, and so these murders got away with it. Murder on the warp speed Express. You know, every one of these doctors and these people get a shot in there. Moderna confirms that COVID mRNA vaccines cause dangerous

cancer cases. This is doctor Robert Malone, who was out of hearing that was being led by Marjorie Taylor Green and as he spoke and I yesterday, I had about a four minute clip, and I think it's better to just kind of summarize what he had to say here because I can slow down in some of the technical spots that he just kind of goes right through because that's

his area of expertise. But at a point o yesterday, you know, we had the Surgeon General in Florida, Joseph Latipo that the SANTIS put in there, it said several months ago stop all of the vaccines for any age because of the contamination. And the contamination that they have found is something that if the FDA followed its own rules, would be an automatic pullet from the market. They don't care. And what doctor Malone was saying was the reason

they don't care is because this is the way they make it. They're not going to clean it up. That's the way they make it. And now Moderna has admitted that it increases causes cancer after billions of DNA fragments were found in the vials of the dangerous injection. The revelation was made after doctor Robert Malone recently appeared in this hearing that was led by Marjorie Taylor Green. He said Moderna's patent shows that its quote unquote vaccine contains billions of DNA fragments and

other contaminants linked to birth defects and cancer. But the amazing thing about it all is that the FDA doesn't care. The government doesn't care at all, just like they didn't care about the fact that scientists with the Children's Health Defense Organization saw that they were going to be putting these particles and polyethylene glycol PEG pagilated and wrapped in that, and they said, well, that's going to cause people to go into anaphyactic shock. They call the FDA. The FDA

said, well, we don't, I don't care. Call Moderna and tell them that, or call Pfizer and tell them that. And they called them up and they didn't car either because they knew they weren't going to be penalized or anything like that. They weren't going to change the way they make the stuff. So he said the problems including the possibility of insertional mutagenesis mutational genetics that could lead to the activation of oncogenes that's cancer, or the inactivation of

tumor suppressor genes. So it can lead to the activation of cancer, it can lead to the suppression of your immune system, and it can genetically mutate you. That's the mechanism, he said. The FDA says that they're not aware of any concerns. But Moderna in its own patent lays out exactly the same concerns that exist about DNA in terms of insertional mutagenesis and genotoxicity, genetic toxic toxicness and inserting things into the gene that are going to cause people have

cancer and other issues. C says. So Maderna knows it that the DNA is a contaminant and it's left in because of the way that they make it. So it's inherent in the process of manufacturing. If they use the DNA to make RNA and then they degrade the DNA and then they have to purify the degraded DNA away from the RNA, and the process that they're using is

not that good. See. And of course, now this is starting to make more sense about the arm twisting blackmail if you will, that Pfizer was doing to Argentina, to Brazil, and to a third unnamed South American country which remained unnamed because they reached an agreement with Pfizer. It was reported in stat News, which is a pharmaceutical trade publication. And you know, and this is back in twenty twenty actually or early twenty twenty one, before they

started putting it out. But what they did was they said, we want you to hold us harmless against any manufacturing defects, against any shipping here and all that's kind say. They said, oh, wait a minute. You know, it's one thing to say we're going to hold you harmless for the formulation, which is being rushed out because we've got an emergency supposedly that we

got to respond to. But if you're saying that you want to be held harmless for any kind of negligent manufacturing or handling of this stuff, now we're not going to go there. And to make it even more interesting, they said, and we want you to indemnify us against this and guarantee it, and if somebody sues us or something very we want you to put assets outside of your sovereign country that you have earmarked for us in case there is some

kind of a lawsuit or something. And so the two of those countries said, we're not going to do it, and they were blackmailing them because at the time they were saying to everybody, if you don't get this and your people don't get it in your country, you're not going to be able to travel. People aren't going to be able to travel in or out of your country. This is the I tell you, we've got global governances in place

and it works with the corporations, and we're going to blackmail you. You're not going to travel in or out of your country if you don't do this. And so that's why these Argentina and Brazil and this other company complained about it to stat News is loockly this we're being blackmailed with this stuff. That's

the same reason why Netan Yahoo used Israelis as lab rats. He wanted to get to the front of the list, and so he promised that he would use his own people as lab rats, and he called a multiple ocasions and we've got the tapes about it. They even did it publicly calls the World Economic Form and brags about how he is taking the lead and using his people as an experiment. And we're going to get the information and it's going to

be a great public service because we're going to use Jews as labrats. Let's talk about i wis should support him. Scientists from the US and Canada were able to get their hands on an unopened vials of Moderna's COVID JAB, a clear chain of custody and they sampled them and this is their expertise. Just to be clear, They do deep sequencing on samples and they relay their findings

for the public good. This is from xpos A News their commentary. What they discovered were large numbers of DNA fragments in the RNA preparation, to which they applied standard reconstruction tools to see what the circular plasmid DNAs look like. None of this was disclosed to the public. By the way. Now, we began this program by talking about the New York Times and said, look at this, We've sampled elk and we've found fragments of bird flu DNA.

Oh, be afraid, be very afraid, and it's front page, headline news and all this kind of stuff. Have they done the same thing with these shots that are being injected into people that have all kinds of DNA fragments in it. They don't care. It just shows you how ruthlessly biased the New York Times and the media are that they would freak out over fragments of DNA and milk and then in the body of things say well, it's not harmful or anything, and then they would not do anything to talk about expert

testimony about the fact that the DNA fragments are in the viles. I think we need to start spelling that v I A l S. This is our v I L E S. Rather. Yeah, it's disgusting how vile this stuff is. And they don't care. They don't care about DNA fragments there, but oh oh, they really care about DNA fragments in milk. The documentation suggests that there are certain DNA sequences present in the vials that are normally not allowed in anything that is going into humans, not the least of which

is an antibiotic resistant gene, said doctor Malone. They include these sequences from semion virus forty SV forty, not the whole virus, he said, but highly active promoter sequences, which is exactly the thing that the FDA and their older regulations said must be avoided. So they don't put all of the SV forty in there, just the most dangerous part of it. It must be avoided, said the FDA in older regulations because it confers even more risk for

insertionble mutagenesis, cancer causing. It turns out that Pfizer's mRNA injection for COVID cans the same contaminants. Documentation was provided by the company to regulators in the US, Europe, and Canada, and then these regulators deleted that information.

You see, partners in crime, and think about how this works. Look if the company was doing this kind of stuff and failed to report it and people found out, if they deleted the information, if they suppressed the information, they could get hit with big fines, jail sentences, a lot of other things like that, Right, But if they ship it over to the FDA and their partners at a government agency delete it, then what happens. Well, the corporation, the company says, we gave them all that information.

We're harmless. What do you do about the FDA regulators nothing? Nothing. They're working in an official capacity, and just like Trump and he kills people, they've got legal immunity. So they don't get a fine, get a jail sales a jail sentence. As a matter of fact, if it gets really big, you'll have the head of the bureaucracy go to Congress and say, you know, this happened because we just don't have enough people for the job. You need to make us bigger. That's the way they respond.

So this is the way the partnership works. It's not just having plausible deniability, like what happens when the Biden White House or the Trump White House partners with social media to censor people. That's when I got censored, is under the Trump White House. But it's not just when they you know, when they partner with people to give themselves plausible deniability. This is actually done so that nobody goes to jail or pays any fines. They cover up for

these corporations. In the same way, when Children's Health Defense contact about the pegold adviruses, they say, well, we don't care talk to them, and they don't do anything about it because they've figured out how to escape any punishment. Doctor Malone said high level people at both Moderna and Pfizer had to have known about this. The potential consequences for JABB recipients being quote, anything that is associated with DNA damage. So what happens when you damage DNA?

Birth defects and cancer being the most notable ones, but of course it's not limited to that as well. I played a little bit of a clip yesterday about the woman who was the hospital medical coder. She would be the one to basically summarize this stuff and put it all there so they could get paid for it. So she's got like a bird's eye seat of all this stuff, and she sees more than any individual nurse would because she's seeing everything that's

coming into the hospital is coming through her. The hospital medical coder, and some of the things that she said, I'll just repeat, I didn't know it was possible for human to die so horrifically so quickly. Before they rolled out the mRNA injections. For days, patients would be seizing and no medication would stop it, and eventually they just had to kind of be put down, she said. They would call it encephalitis or incephalopathy, and then later

on even the coding Organization called it COVID nineteen associated encephalitis. You said, but the clots were insane, never seeing clots like that before. Even the interventional radiologists that were going in with scopes where they can do heart interventions and do stints. A stint is a tube, usually constructed metal alloy or polymer, put into an artery if you have a stroke going to your brain. Normally it is rare to have more than one stint going in. They were

documenting multiple locations at once. There were people that were hiking in their twenties, that were totally healthy, that been running marathons, that suddenly needed a leg amputated because they had a massive blood clot going from their hip all the way down to their leg and it couldn't be saved. She said. Knowing what the potential symptoms of a vaccine injury could be, we had all the things I just described. Despite that knowledge, doctors would never tell patients that.

They would just say, it's a stroke, it's a heart attack, it's a blood clot, and they would never connect the two. They would never connect the dots on Rumble. Colton Kimberly, thank you very much. That's very generous. I appreciate that, mister Knight. Many thanks in a

few bucks for the show. Also, thanks for the Roku app. Thank you for reminding me we're on Roku, and so if you have the app, or if you want to find us on Roku, we have a Roku channel and so you can search it on your search engine find that, or you can go to Roku to find it. And so I'm glad that we've got somebody watching us. If you're watching make sure you like us on Roku so we can get the visibility up. But thank you very much. Appreciate

that. Colton and on Zel I got these. I guess Karen gave these two. Yeah he's not his said yes on Zel. Contributions from Jeffrey C. David R. Armando, M. Jacqueline. Thank you very much. On subscribe Star we got new subscriber, Rick D and just Me eighty three gave us a tip on subscribe Star. Thank you very much. On rock Finn Andromeda one very generous. Thank you very much. That is really kind, David. Last month I lost my thirty seven year old son to addiction.

Oh I'm so sorry. It was a brilliant man who understood how evil and corrupt our government is. As you correctly say, this is a spiritual problem. Please pray for him. Yes, I'm so sorry, and for you. I'm so sorry for your lots. God bless you and your family and super Fay who's matching today. Your show has given me strength through this most difficult time. I am so sorry. I am so sorry. Well, we are not without hope, and that absolutely is true, and so

I just pray for you and your family. I'm so sorry. That that happened to you. And as we are talking about medication and its effect on people, there is an article out of Harvard University, Harvard Medical School. It's published in stat News that I was talking about earlier, and this is

a guy at Harvard who wants antidepressants for everybody SSRIs. We call them murder suicide pills because so often and you know, when I played the clip earlier this week from the survivor of the column Line shooting, and he said, you know, these guys, it's not the bullying that they went through. He said they were just playing really dark, evil stuff and they planned this and all that. So they said, it's not the bullying, it's not drugs, it's not all that kind of stuff. And I think in their

case probably it was not SSRIs. They had been planning it for quite some time, and that's not the way that works. And yet, you know, when we look at this and I can't remember, maybe you can remember her name, Travis, the lady that we interviewed who got the black box label on SSRIs because of what happened to her husband. And I have interviewed people who set up a website called ssristories dot Org. They've got forget if

it's seven thousand and nine thousand different stories that are there. And it's amazing how common these stories are. I just talked a week or so ago about Phil Hartman and his wife who was on SSRIs. The lady who got the black box thing put on her husband was very fit, and he wasn't depressed or anything. He was just having some trouble sleeping and the doctor prescribed an SSRI for him and he had really bad reactions to it. It felt like

his body was on fire. And I think she had a business trip when she was gone, it just started the stuff. Doesn't know if you know he continued taking or or if you stopped taking it. That's frequently what causes the issue. The way one of the people that I talked to at SSRIs stories described it, You know, if you just changing the level of medication and doing too much too soon, you got to get off of it very,

very gradually, or it will create these very same problems. And so I said, well, it sounds to me it's kind of like, you know, I did scuba diving when I was younger, said, it sounds to me like the bins. You know, you go down and you're operating at a depth, and the nitrogen dissolves into your blood stream, and so you have to come up very very slowly if you've been down for a while,

and so you have to come up very slowly. If you don't do it slowly enough, the nitrogen bubbles out of your bloodstream and creates all kinds of pain and damage. It can kill you in your body and incredibly painful. That type of things. They have to be very very careful about that. My instructors had been industrial divers. They did welding underwater. You're talking about something dangerous. I mean, that's crazy. And both of them had

severe injuries. They were still diving, but they both had had severe injuries, and one of them had been bent. But you know, they had had things fall on them or whatever. Basically barely survived. Face of one of the was all messed up and everything. And I took it with a friend. We're partners, and not too long after we took it, I said, you know, it's kind of like that moment in that comedy thing where the two Nazis are sitting around the things, like, have you ever

thought, are we the bad guys? Why do we get these skulls on our head and ims thinking. I said down, I said, do you ever think about how dangerous is Look at our instructors. I mean, these guys are are just barely survived whatever it was that they did. Maybe we shouldn't be doing this. And I had a friend of my dad who's sold insurance and sold him his insurance. My dad mentioned something about me going diving,

and he said, I didn't hear that. He says, if if it's found out that your son scuba diving, we're gonna have to cancel his insurance. We treat that like skydiving. So it's various things like that, little hints that I got that God put in my life that got me out of it before I got hurt. But but the reason I mentioned all that is because the SSRI stuff is like getting bent. You know, you have to be very very careful, gradually, very very gradually come off of this

stuff. And a lot of times it has its own horrible side effects. Like in her husband's case, she was his body was on fire, and so you know, if he just stops taking it, it hits him that

way. But this guy, Roy Perlis, a professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School argued that antidepressants known as SSRI is selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, should be made available at US pharmacies without a prescription, just right over the counter, you know, like the abortion pill, which again you know, if you don't have a physician looking at how far a long are you in your pregnancy? Are you in a condition where this is going to threaten your health

if you do a chemical? So this guy Perlis calls on called on drug manufacturers to quote engage with the FDA and invest the necessary resources. In other words, pay off some politicians and bureaucrats so that you can sell your stuff across the counter. Why not everybody else does it? Right to make it possible, because SSRIs have quote repeatedly been shown to be safe and effective for treating major depression and anxiety disorders. Well, take a look at SSR stories

dot org. If you are thinking about doing this, it may not happen to you. It doesn't happen to everybody. Of course, if it happened to everybody, then they would easily recognize it. But if you got somebody over here that didn't happen to see it, didn't happen to this person, Well, I'm glad that it didn't, but look at how many other people

it did happen to. It comes off the back of a recent FDA ruling that allows the purchase of oral contraceptives over the counter without a doctor being involved. Perlis treats patients and Massachusetts General Hospital. He failed to declare his ties to the pharmaceutical industry in the article. Isn't that a surprise? Sparking anger among academics online? In other words, this guy is hawking drugs the same way that Rick Perry at a former staffer who left him, went to work

for a pharmaceutical company and then goes back to work for Rick Perry. And the next thing you know, Rick Perry is saying, well, everybody needs to take this HPV vaccine. All his students need to take this. And he was the first one to do something like that, And then everybody pointed out the connections that he had too. I think it was merk. Antidepressants are among the most prescribed treatments in the world. In fact, many experts

have argued that they are over prescribed. SSRI induced suicide is not limited to young peoplewo thousand and seven, the FDA updated the black box label on SSRI packaging. Again, I interviewed the widow who spent so much of her life getting that black box warning on there, warning doctors to monitor suicidality and patience of all ages after they start the medication. And yet you know, when you look at this, Harvard Medical has long pushed these SSRIs so that they

got the black box label in two thousand and seven. Seven years later, Harvard was of contacting the mainstream media and saying suicides have gone up since we got this black box warning. Really, what does that? Does that prove anything? I mean? And there was a big back and forth, a lot of people push back on that conclusion that was being pushed out there. The bottom line is Harvard has been pushing sris for a very very long time.

In some instances, when researchers have gained access to regulatory documents, they found that vital data on suicides were excluded from journal publications. Perlis at Harvard also says that there's low potential for misuse and abuse of antidepressants, but he overlooks the fact that SSRIs can lead to dependency people often experience discontinuation syndrome. It's what I was talking about with the bends upon ceasing SSRIs, because they

are habit forming and can cause abstinence symptoms. Yeah, people who forget to take their medication or deliberately well i'm having this or that problem, I'm going to cut it down, And that's what it is. One of some of these things happen. One kid who was on it, he cut down his

medication because he was having secondary tertiary problems. And he went to school with a rifle and he got in front of the class and he pointed the rifle and the people in the classroom and he pointed himself, and he pointed back, and so went on for a while till they got the rifle away from him put him in the hospital. He didn't know what he was doing, and he didn't have any recollection of that event at all. About half the

people on SSRIs have difficulties stopping them. Their withdrawal symptoms can lead to suicide, violence, and homicide. Some patients report the withdrawal is worse than their original depression. If SSRI has become available without prescription, who will counsel patients about tapering off their medications. Another significant problem is that few patients and doctors for that matter, are aware that SSRIs have potential to cause severe, sometimes

irreversible sexual dysfunction that persists even after discontinuing the medication. Well, that's depressing. I guess the condition called post SSRI sexual dysfunction. They call it PSSD. Actually, I think it should be PSSRSD. If we can remember all the LGBT initials and put a plus back there just in case we forgot one, they could do it with this. It could PSSRISD plus. No, they call it pssd's a PSD is PSSD. It has been described as sufferers

as chemical castration. The problem is underrecognized, largely underreported, but drug regulators are starting to pay attention. In June twenty nineteen, the European Medicines Agency that's their FDA updated the Special Warnings and Precautions section on their package insert label to warn that sexual dysfunction can persist even after the treatment stops. In Canada, UH twenty twenty one, Health Canada updated their product label for the same

thing, but not FDA, not Harvard. Yeah, just it's solid over the counter. This is something that earned the black label. More than the black label, it should have been banned. Frankly, Perlis at Harvard says people should be able to access antidepressants without prescription because they're capable of self diagnosing in the same way that many over the counter products are used to treat symptoms. He said, you know, think about it as yeast infections or acid

reflux or respiratory infections. He said, these people will do anything for money, won't they Truly is amazing. Yeah, the time for over the counter antidepressants has come. Is the article that he wrote in stat News, and I stay away from SSR, I stay away from Harvard Medical. These are the same people who came after Marty Gottisfeld. I mean, they are politically very powerful, got him put into a communication management unit because he embarrassed them

over medical kidnapping. And that wasn't the only case of medical kidnap. The allegations that they had had either. Who expects a seventy seven percent increase in cancer cases as I point out before, but anything other than mRNA injections are what they're going to look at, as a matter of fact, almost doubling they estimate they're going to go up to a thirty five million new cancer case cases by twenty fifty, which is a seventy seven percent increase over the estimated

twenty million that they were expecting. The who ignored the emergence of rapid growing turbo cancers and people who have received one or more of the trump shots. Many of these cancers are showing up in young people, many of them under the age of thirty, who have no family history of cancer at all. So how might they trigger the cancer? Well, we've already talked about Robert

Malone and other people there. Doctor Macis, who I've talked to, had focused in the past on some of the synthetic ingredients that were in it. But I think it's the DNA contamination that is going to be the key thing. And the people who did that study that doctor Malone was talking about were from the MIT Human Genome Project. Kevin Mccaerron and former researcher and team leader for the Human Genome Project at MIT and his colleagues were the ones who got

those vials and had a chain of custody. They said, DNA contamination that exceeds the European Medicines Agencies requirement and the FDA's requirements are found, and we've known this for many, many months. Will the FDA follow their own rules? No. What they do is they attack and criticize doctor Joseph Latipo because he says, no, you shouldn't have this because according to the FDA rules, this is contaminated. And they admit, but they won't take it off

the market. It's just amazing to me how corrupt our government has become in all these different areas. Even when you look at the Emergency Use Authorization, there's a good article on Brownstone about what it truly is. It is the Emergency Use Authorization is not something that is just for an experimental project. Product

that is undergoing clinical trial doesn't have anything to do with that. The article by Debbie Lherman on Brownstone says, during the COVID pandemic, the US government spent billions of dollars on nearly four hundred products intended to protect, diagnose, treat hundreds of millions of people. All of them were given the label of EUA. Well, let's let's correct that during the COVID pandemic the Trump administration. You got to say his name, say his name. He wants the

credit for this, give him the credit that he so desperately desires. So he said his helpful. Look at what an EUA is not. It is not designation for an experimental product that is being undergoing evaluation. The FDA tells us that the process of getting an EUA is not likely to generate any information about the product's effectiveness. It is not designed to provide evidence of safety or of effectiveness. It is unlikely that any useful information will be obtained to benefit

future patients. They say, there is no systematic data collection. No data is published in medical journals. We've noticed that, haven't we. No informed consent is required. But patients who volunteer, you know you volunteer because if you don't volunteer, they're going to fire you. They have to be told that they can refuse and that the product is unapproved and under although it's available

under EUA. This is why they waited until they gave their quasi approval to it in September twenty twenty one, and then they required it from people in the military. No institutional review board is required and all the rest of this stuff. So the bottom line is you have to understand it's not part of a development pathway. It is something that is entirely separate. They're not evaluating it for safety, for efficacy. Process of granting a product EUA is unlikely

to generate any evidence of safety or effectiveness. Once a product is granted EUA and administered to patients, is unlikely that any useful information will be obtained to

benefit future patients. I think we've noticed that, haven't we. It's meant only for weapons of mass destruction emergencies, which is what they practiced in Dark Winter in two thousand and one and continued on three steps for emergency use authorization, you've got to have The first thing is you've got to have somebody that's either the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Health in the Human Service. Is that's the person Big Pharmas Alex's are the

former CEO of ELI Lilly. He was the one that did that in January twenty twenty. That's a first step. Then the FDA looks at some of these other statutory things, and then they have to impose certain required conditions on it. But that was the key thing. This is meant only for weapons of mass destruction. And that's why it was so vital that Alexizar declared that emergency at the end of January in twenty twenty. Now Trump did on that

Friday the thirteenth in March. The purpose of that was to unleash money, and the purpose of the money is to get everybody to do what you want them to do, which is what the Department of Education is starting to come back now. You know it was under the Biden administration of the Obama administration where they said, if you don't put the boys in the girls' locker rooms and showers, were going to take away all that money you become addicted to.

And so you know that is coming back. Now, what a surprise. And so again, once one of these secretaries has declared, in this case it was HHS, that there was an emergency, then the FDA looks at some requirements. Is you know, it has to be used for a serious or life threatening disease or condition. They hyped everybody to believe that that was what was happening, even though there was no pandemic. You need to have evidence of effectiveness. What do we have with that? We had statements,

Oh yeah, it's it's ninety four ninety four and a half. It's one hundred percent now and then it starts falling and all the rest of stuff. It's just letting these people put it out there, and the risk benefit analysis, all that kind of stuff they just get to put And then the key thing, no alternatives. And that fourth thing there is why they fought tooth and nail to shut down ivermectinn, HCQ and zinc. Any of these

things got to have no all alternatives. And of course it was always from dark Winter on it was always lock everybody down until we're ready to vaccinate them. That was what they practiced for twenty years. On Rumble, Alan J. Seventy eight, thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. And on Rumble super Fay says, who is matching all the tips today, thank you so much for doing that, o Faye. She says. Raw milk has cured many of my health issues, and I'm absolutely not going

to stop kissing my chickens. I've heard that before about raw milk as well, and about butter milk is as well. I'm really concerned because our dairy here, we have a local dairy. They are required in order to sell they sell in some of the grocery stores, but we go to the dairy on Saturdays. They're opened up and they pasteurize it so they you know, don't get into the raw milk hassle stuff, but so you lose some of

the good probiotics that are in it. But the key thing is that they don't homogenize it, and it's you know, I think that the homogenization is a very dangerous, very negative thing, the way it suspends those particles the while your body is not meant to handle that. So plus it tastes a lot different, a lot better than the regular milk that is in the store. And it's cream colored as opposed to white like the stuff you get in the store. So I know they're struggling, and I hope that this isn't

going to be used to put them out of business. But yeah, I've heard that about raw milk before from a lot of people. On Rumble, Ali's dad says, I'll get chicken today on Rock Fin Tornator. Thank you very much for the tip. Happy Friday, David, God bless you and your family and the person matching donations that's FAE. With regard to Columbine, please try to get Jennifer Small on your show. She's a survivor of the Columbine shooting and according to her, we haven't been told the whole story.

Don Jefferies had her on his show and her story was interesting to say the least. Then gave me a link to it. Well, I'll have to do that. Yeah, that was It was interesting to hear what he had to say. I didn't hear his entire interview. I was really more interested and how he was dealing with a forgiveness because his sister was killed and several of his friends and he really struggled with that for a while, and so

I wanted people to hear that aspect of it. But yeah, Columbine was only the one that kind of kicked it off, and I'm sure that there's a lot there, So I'll take a look at that. Thank you very much. Make sure you save that, Travis. We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere from country, blues, classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.

Get details at APS Radio dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Let's talk a little bit about what's going on with the climate. Mcguffin. We've talked about the attacks on our food and of course that is really key. I mean, we don't want to lose our ability to move, We don't want to lose our power. The power grid that the EPA is attacking as well. It used to be they just attacked our cars.

Now they want to take down the power grid as well. We have four new types of power plant regulations and rules that have just been released by the EPA under Biden. The bureaucratic deep state is going to kill electricity as well as cars, as well as food. You know, the EPA's got a hand in the attack on our food supply as well. Before we get back into the news, just real quickly, Karen handed this to me on subscribe,

so we got a couple of tips. I want to thank people for Matthew d and I'm not sure if that's an S or J so it's either Joe Lanta or so Lanta w thank you very much on Zell lewis a thank you very much, and thank you to super Fay who agreed to match tips today because we were down so low this month at just fifty one percent before the program started on the gas gage for the month, and we're getting pretty close to the end. But let's talk about what's going on with the EPA.

The Biden administration yesterday announced a series of new rules against coal and natural gas. There you go. Isn't it amazing how much you can get done with a bureaucracy when you don't have to depend on a democratic process. Isn't it amazing that they can do taxation without representation. Isn't it amazing that they can do regulation without representation? Actually, I think it's a revolting don't you. As in the American Revolution, the electricity industry is central to America's economic

growth and independence, said the administrator of the EPA. Therefore we're going to kill it. No, he said, these are folks who keep the lights on and the power for our country to move forward. So he really loves it. It's just like these people say, I really love babies, but let's abort them. Let's kill them right. At the same time, he said, the power sector is also a major contributor to the pollution that drives climate change and threatens public health. Is at the EPA. It is our

responsibility to act within the bounds of our legal authority. Well, then turn the lights out and go home, because you don't have any authority to exist. There's no constitutional authority for the federal government to do anything about pollution. That is a state power, a state function. There's nothing in the Constitution about that. And any of the powers that have not been delegated by the states and by the people, says the Tenth Amendment, don't belong to the

federal government. You're an illegal, unconstitutional agency created by Richard Nixon. But of course when the president does it, it's constant right by definition. No, no, it isn't. But this is what it looks like, new rules pronounced by the bureaucratic state, the deep state. And as they point out in this on ABC News, even though this is being done by the

EPA, this is the Biden administration, because Biden could stop this. Biden is in agreement with it, but he is tacitly in agreement with it if he's going to let it stand. The deep state, the bureaucratic state, whatever you want to call it, is underneath the presidency. And that's why for all you MAGA people out there, that's why we talk about the lockdowns and the hospital death protocols and the masking and all the rest of the stuff

that was the Trump administration. Everybody else uses that title, except we have people who go out of their way, and the conservative media, especially the alternative conservative media, go out of their way to ever say his name. It isn't Donald Tries, It's not the Trump administration. No, it was COVID that did it. It was a pandemic that did it. It was Fauci who did it. It's never Trump who did it. And yet he is responsible for all that stuff. The buck stops with him. It starts

with him as well, because he paid for it. Power Plants account for more than one quarter of all greenhouse gases. They said, so kill it. Even if that were true, I'm going to get to this very important study that says that the CO two gas is not an issue. It cannot cause global warming. The age of unbridled climate pollution from power plants is over, pronounces this President and Chief Executive Officer for the Natural Resources Defense Council.

So we have an NGO non governmental organization, plus an unconstitutional bureaucracy. We should call them ucbs unconstitutional bureaucracy. So we have the unconstitutional bureaucracy of the EPA and a non governmental organization, the Natural Resources Defense Council, pronouncing this stuff, making these little dictatorial fiats out there backing it up with their FIAT cash from the Federal Reserve. The age of power plants is over, it's

really what she's saying, because these things threaten our health. And again it was Lisa Jackson, Obama's EPA administrator, who was lying within Congressman now Senator Marquee from Massachusetts saying fine particular matter two point five is killing more people than heart attacks and cancer, which is an absolute lie. And at the same time she was doing this prepared dialogue. They had written it out. They

even stepped on each other's lines in a couple of spots. But while they're reading this prepared dialogue and Congress, the EPA and Research Triangle Park where I

was was putting people on a pipe and feeding them. They'd remove the carbon dioxide, but they were giving them levels of PM two point five, that's fine particular matter at two point five microns, giving them that at seventy two times the level that the EPA had said was safe, and just to make sure they were going to get a reaction, they advertised for people who had heart or respiratory illness and then put them on that they know it's not harmful,

and so again, you know, the group I was with sued them because like, all right, either confess you know, either you are breaking the Nuremberg Code and trying to kill people, or you know there's nothing wrong with this stuff, which is it? The course just threw the thing out that way. I don't care for the seventy percent of the nation's coal and natural gas plants are located in communities of color or low income communities. So

according to the black EPA administrator Reagan, it's pollution is racist. CO two is racist. It's not pollution, it's just CO two. CO two is racist. There you go. Well, we know Edison Electric Institute, which is an organization representing US investor owned electric companies, told ABC News it supports the EPA. We really love the EPA and we want to do everything that

we can to help them. They're very afraid to oppose it because you get these bureaucrats angry Yeah, they're a little fiefdom there, and they're shut you down real fast. So they're afraid to directly oppose them, just like the Conservatives are afraid to oppose Trump. They have to dance around this. While we appreciate and support the EPA's work to develop a clear, continued path for a transition to cleaner resources, we are disappointed that the agency did not address

the concerns that we raised about carbon capture and storage. Carbon capture and storage is not ready yet for full scale, economy wide deployment, nor is there sufficient time to permit, to finance, and to build the carbon capture and storage infrastructure needed for compliance by twenty thirty two. So what they're saying is,

I thought we had a deal. You know, you told us that we could play this little game where we're gonna, you know, grab the CO two and we're gonna stick it in the ground or something, And now we don't have enough time to do that. You're just gonna shut us down. It's like, yep, yep, that's what we're gonna do, kind of like jabsend Arden. You know, it sounds to me like you're just going to start, you know, you're going into full on dictatorship. Yep,

yep, that's what we're doing. Yep, yep. They're not interested in any of these so called solutions to this imaginary mcguffin, and it truly is imaginary. The Biden administration is declaring another national emergency over climate change. See we're ruled by one emergency declaration after the other. During Trump began that, and now Biden is continuing that with everything. Everything is an emergency. So if you declare it's an emergency, you can rule without any law being

applied to you about anything. You know. Again, think about this. After this next election, Trump or Biden will be there. Both these guys have ruled by emergency executive orders, they've ruled by FIAT, and it's going to be one of the two of them. It's going to take us through

the end of this fourth turning. Top advisors to Biden have recently resumed talks about the merits of such a move, an emergency declaration, which could be used to curtail crude sports, to suspend offshore drilling, to curb emissions, and all the rest. In other words, to turn off our power and to ban cars. Officials have not made a decision on the matter, nor

is any decoration emminent. They're going to wait until after the election. You do this kind of stuff before the election, and people are not going to be happy with this. We used that same Defense Production Act that Trump used to start essentially overnight a heat pump manufacturing industry. So you know, Trump used that Defense Production Act to tell all the car companies stop making cars, start making ventilators. And then he hammered GM for not making these things fast

enough. And what did they do, Well, they killed people, They were useless, dangerous. And so what is Biden going to do. Well, he's going to tell people what we can't have ranges, and we can't have heating and air conditioning that are anything other than electric. He wants to do to our homes what Trump did try to do to our bodies, and he's going to use it with this emergency declaration that is out there as well. So here's the study and it's peer reviewed. By the way, this

is not a pre print study. This is peer reviewed. It is endorsed by a lot of scientists, including a couple of newly minted Nobel Prize winners. The study says that carbon emissions cannot cause global warming cannot cause it. A bombshell new peer reviewed study has provided conclusive scientific evidence proving that carbon dioxide emissions cannot cause global warming. Doctor Jen Kubicki, or maybe it's Yon. He's from Poland ja In led a group of world renowned Polish scientists to study

the impact of increases in CO two emissions on the Earth's global temperatures. However, not only did they find that higher levels of CO two made no difference, but they also proved that it simply as impossible for increases in carbon dioxide to cause temperatures to rise. The emperor has no clothes, or I guess we could say the emperor has no cause. The emperor has no cause for this stuff, and so you don't have any justification for any of this stuff.

The emperor has no cause. And by the way, we've pointed this out before, along with their failed predictions, along dire things about it. There's not going to be any more snow, and the glaciers are going to disappear, and all the stuff that you've been hearing from al Gore, from RFK Junior all these years, and for people like Michael Mann, with all

these lies that are out there. One of the key things was when you look at things like Michael Mann's fake and Faulse projection with a hockey stick and everything, they had a correlation whereas CO two was increasing, temperature would increase. And yet you know now that these models and things like that are several decades old. What we've seen is that CO two has increased, but there

was no increase in temperature. They were not correlated to each other. That's what these people are saying, But they're saying a lot more than that. They're giving you an explanation as to why CO two is not why temperature is not tied to CO two. Kubiki and his team recently published three papers which all conclude that the Earth's atmosphere is already saturated with carbon dioxide. So this saturation means that even at greatly increased levels of CO two, the greenhouse gas

will not cause temperatures to rise. Current levels of CO two in the atmosphere around four hundred and eighteen parts per million, but the scientists state that passed four hundred parts per million, and we're past that the CO two concentration can no longer cause any increase in temperature, so it's saturated from the standpoint of having an effect on temperature. The saturation of CO two is the hypothesis that dare not speak its name. In mainstream media politics. All we hear from

these people is carbon, carbon, carbon, carbon carbon. They don't even fill in that finish the rest of it. And I've seen so many times reporters who refer to carbon monoxide. Yeah, we don't want to fill the atmosphere with carbon monoxide. That happens when you I have the car running and you shut the garage door, and that's fatal. But there's a big difference between carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. But they don't even make the distinction.

And since it's so confusing to these reporters and politicians, they just say carbon, especially because you know, we get carbon on our hands. It's black, it's a soot or something. Oh, we've got to get rid of all that stuff. The World Economic Forums net zero collectivism agenda is doomed without the constant fear mongering of a so called climate crisis, So this is key,

folks. The saturation hypothesis is complex, but in simple terms it can be described of the example of insulation and the loft of a house, for example. After a certain point, doubling the insulation that you put up in the roof, it's going to have little effects since most of the heat trying to escape through the roof has already been trapped. That's what they're saying, saying, we've got so much insulation in the roof, we don't need to

add more stuff. And well, if we do add more stuff, it isn't going to make any difference to our heating bill, right, That's what they're saying. It's just that simple. And that's one of the reasons why perhaps if they're right, sounds like they are, because we have not seen a correlation between additional CO two and any warming, just like you would not see any benefit in terms of insulation if you add at it past a certain

point. Carbon dioxide traps heat only within narrow bands of the infrared spectrum. Levels of the gas have been up to twenty times higher in the past without any sign of runaway global warming. And they know this because they have gone through and taken ice core samples and you looked at geological records and things like

that. They know that we've had twenty times the amount of CO two that we do right now, and the planet did not boil, and so these people don't want you to know that, and they cherry picked their temperature. And that's the other part of it. You know, you look at all of the ghost weather stations that they got places where they've just shut them down. You know, they're not worried about this stuff, or they'd be putting more of these stations up. But they don't have a historical record. They

don't have an accurate current record for this stuff. They've changed where and how they're taking the temperature measurements, and they don't have that much anyway. You know, people were not keeping temperature records all over the planet, you know, for more than about a century or so. Many other scientists are attracted to this saturation hypothesis because it provides a more plausible explanation to fit what we

see in the climate. Last year, three scientists led by atmospheric professor the Eye Wang of McGill University stated quote, transmission in the CO two band center is unchanged by increased CO two as the absorption is already saturated. Despite over

fifty years of trying climate modelers and scientists in the anthropogenic camp. That means man made climate change camp are no near putting a temperature rise on doubling of CO two in the atmosphere estimates from half a degree centigrade up to about six degrees centigrade. Well, that would tell you that they really don't know, right, if it varies my factor of twelve, they have absolutely no idea.

These models are all over the place, with some outliers as high as ten degrees see uh so again varies by factor of twenty, not twelve, as little more than guesses, and yet they form the scientific bedrock. You know, keep hearing there's a scientific consensus, is there? You've got metal models that say that it's going to cause the temperature to go up by half a degree centegrade, and you've got some models at say ten degrees integrade.

Do you have a scientific consensus? No, you don't. It's not even close. And by the way, science is not decided by consensus. Science always advances when somebody questions the consensus. The figures are too wild, too imprecise to make any reasonable scientific predictions. But that's not what they're trying to do. They're trying to push fear, just like with the bird flu.

So the Polish authors of this thing are concerned, they said, about the recent push to rely on modeling, computer modeling, and to rely on assumptions about CO two's capacity to drive changes in global temperatures rather than observational evidence. That's real science. You know, we're getting rid of doing real science. And this is happening in the drugs as well. You know they talk about in vitro that means in the glass petri dish, right, and so they

can do experiments in vitro. So you can have in vitro fertilization, or you can have you can take some bacteria or something and you can put silver in the in the glass file and you can see it dies. And people say, yeah, but does that work when the bacteria is in your body and you and you ingest silver something like that. So to test that, you do you do a different test in the person. And now they've got they just go to models. It's like, well, I don't really care

about you know, testing my hypothesis in glass or in the body. I will just do it, you know, instead of doing it in the glass, instead of doing it in the living thing, I will do it in a computer model, and they call that in silica, and so I'll test it in silicon. And they're doing that with drugs now, and that's what they're doing with their climate modeling. They're just doing it in silicon. So

they have certain assumptions about how things work. And we go back to that simulation that Fauci and Burks apparently gave Trump and he said, well, two very smart people gave this to me, and this is what's going to happen. Well, they didn't have as part of their assumption. They didn't have they didn't have far as curve the cave that we're going to flatten. There wasn't a curve. So they had a false assumption and then they had a

bad implementation of it, and that's what you wind up with. So they rely on modeling, and they rely on assumptions, and sometimes the assumptions are false, like it was with that Imperial College of London assumption about COVID, which was not a pandemic even at that time. So they do that instead of observational evan and that's what real science is. That's why I've said for a long time, you look at the American Meteorological Society, They will have

people come in and do their weather prediction. Here's the factors that we're looking at. Here's how we think they're going to interplay with each other. So this is our model. And then we went out and we did observations. Were we able to predict what was going to happen with the weather, and so everybody was doing that, trying to get better and better. But they were able to do observational evidence. These people know. But now we can

do observational evidence of their stuff. We can now see that they were lying to us because we've got you know, they were fifty years out, fifty four years out from this stuff, and we know these people are lying about everything. Everything failed. So the this equivocally suggests the officially presented impact of anthropogenic CO two increase on the Earth's climate is merely a hypothesis rather than a

substained shaded fact. It's a hypothesis that's been proven false, just like the COVID mcgoffn Emeritus Professor William Happer of Princeton is another leading proponent of the saturation hypothesis. Remember I played the clip for you the other day of a movie Climate. The movie had several people comment and say it's an excellent film. I haven't seen the whole movie yet, it's an excellent trailer. Martin Durkin did climate the movie, and Happer, Professor William Happer of Princeton, was

featured in it. In the film, he responds to current quote unquote science that enforces the World Economic Forum's net zero agenda. In the film, he said he could live with the descriptive suggestion of hoax, although he preferred the word scam. Well, I could live with hoax, but I think it's more of a scam. In the twenty twenty two Nobel Physics Laureate, doctor John Klauser blasted the climate narrative in no uncertain terms. He said, I

assert there is no connection whatsoever between climate change and CO two. It's all a crock of crap in my opinion. Okay, so hoax, scam, crock of crap. It's pure Bolshevik because they're using it for Marx's reasons in it. So Klauser is highly respected. I mean he just won the Nobel Prize in Physics, a modern science giant. He has also signed a declaration

asserting what he just said about these climate predictions. He joined over sixteen hundred scientists from around the world, including another Nobel Prize winner, by signing a declaration stating that claims of a quote climate emergency unquote are a hoax. The massive group of scientists signed the World Climate Declaration, which declares there is no climate emergency. It says climate science should be less political, while climate policies

should be more scientific. I like that scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations and their predictions of global warming. It says, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of the policy measures. Wouldn't that have been nice during COVID, for example, Well, the real costs of your lockdowns and business closures and face masks and your rim dezevir and your

ventilators and all the rest of this stuff versus your imagined benefits. They stress, there is no statistical evidence to support these claims. There's no climate emergency. Therefore there is no cost for panic and alarm, say the scientists. We strongly oppose a harmful and unrealistic net zero CO two policy proposed for twenty to fifty. During a separate speech, Klauser warned the public that the climate crisis narrative being pushed by the global elite and their allies in the corporate media

is a hoax. He was also awarded the twenty ten Wolf Prize in Physics, the second most prestigious physics award after the Nobel Prize, and he's won both of them. And he warns that fear mongering climate science is nothing more than listen to this quote massive shock journalistic pseudoscience unquote. He said, the popular narrative about climate change reflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world's economy and the well being of billions of people. This is why people like

Bill Gates wants to push the essentials of two plus two egles five. That's why he wants to say that math is racist, and he's got all these other things to dumb people down. They deliberately want to dumb people down. They want to say that math is racist, that science is racist, and so forth. They don't want any critical thinking whatsoever. And that is going to be even more destructive than what they're doing to destroy our society, our

energy, infrastructure, our transportation, our food everything. We won't be able to rebuild it quite frankly if they're successful, and of course it threatens to rob each and every one of us for the benefit of the few. In turn, he says, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills. It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agencies, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists. In my

opinion, there is no real climate crisis. Could they be any more adamant about this and specific about it? I don't think so. Well. I've got a lot of people comments here, so let me get to some of these here on Rumble Beast slice, thank you very much, and writes, I still don't trust Malone or McCullough for that matter. He still prescribes drugs made by Pfizer. I didn't know that. Also check out Shannon Joy. She detests Trump for all the right reasons and thinks of Faye, well,

thank you. And I was on Shannon Joy's program once. I need to talk to her more, get her on my program, I think. But yeah, I you know, Malon and McCullough were late to it, and the way I look at that, you know, it's like, I think they've both done some good work, but you know, we have to look

at the totality of it. I don't know if they're still, you know, prescribing some of this stuff, but they were slow to get to that point because that was not their area of expertise and they had to you know, and there was so much interference with the information that was put out there. Again, since this was political and medical, somebody who's watching politics is going to see it sooner. I was able to see it sooner because I've

been watching things like Dark Winter and stuff like that. I've been watching the Shenanigans of the CIA for a long time, and so it was pretty obvious where this thing was going. But for somebody who hadn't been looking at the Germ Games, it take him a while to really catch on to what's going on because they hide all that stuff on Rumble for the love of the Road. Good to see you there. Thanks, thanks for the support, and thank you for that tip. I appreciate that he puts up the show on

telegram. I've never been able to get everything together to kind of scope out telegram, but he's been putting up our program on telegram, so I really do appreciate that. Thank you, and he says, thanks, super Fae. The new commercial sounds great. You need Trump and Biden ads to go with Fauci and La La. If you know how to rate the Roku app, please let us know. I don't know, he says, he's tried it on TV and on the phone. I don't see how well, thank

you. I'll have to take a look at you. I don't have Roku, so I have to take a look at that. It's like there's so many different platforms out there. We'll try to find out what's going on with it and I'll let you know. But thank you for the support. Neuro Divergent on Rumble, thank you for the tip, says thanks super Fae for consistently stepping up to support the Knights. Yes and the broadcast. Prayers for you and the family, David, and for your health. Thank you very

much. Steve Swan, thank you. On Rock Finn, Wayne Wonder, thank you, Rock Finn. Jessica Morrow thank you, and she says, thank you David for your continued effort in a spiritual battle. May God continue to bless the Night family. Well. Thank you. Sean E on Rock Finn, thank you and Jason Barker writes, David should have a panel of people in the background answering phones like the old telephons. We can make those typewriter noises background so they're very, very busy, and get some walla walla

as they call the crowd murmuring, there we go. Let's got it right there. Operators are standing by folks. There's that's gonna say. That's my great aunt Froz ninety nine. Oh, we got Kramer. That's even better, except he'll probably make everybody angry and then hang up on him, right rock Fan Liberty Mom, I thank you for the tip. I'm sending five hundred via Zell so rock Fan doesn't take a cut. We need to fill up the tank. Thank you so much for doing that. Wow, that

is amazing, And you know that is a thing. You know, Zell doesn't have any fees, and so that is a big advantage. I don't mention it too much because I just, you know, whatever is most convenient for people. I know a lot of people their bank doesn't operate with Zell, but if it does, that is absolutely It's the one place between that and checks where there's no fees involved. So I really do thank you for that. We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.

H you're listening to the David Knight Show, Elvis, the Beatle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com. And Karen just handed this to me. She got off the

phone with Zell's not doing that, but she did see it on Zel, Scott l and Baby Bear. Thank you very much for the tips on Zell. Before we run out of time, I want to talk a little bit about what is going on with the obsession of the Democrats to sterilize, to groom, to mutilate our children. It just truly is amazing and a lot of pushback, angry pushback from mainstream media by the fact that Tennessee lawmakers have just okayed a bill to criminalize adults who help miners. This is the way

AP puts it to help miners receive gender affirming care. No, what they did is they criminalize the grooming, sterilization and mutilization of children against their parents wishes without their knowledge as well. But the bill mirrors almost the same language I said from a so called anti abortion trafficking proposal. See, they hate that that's ap AP violated its own speech rules. They're not supposed to say, uh, well, they do anti abortion rights, right they won't call

it pro life proposal. Uh And and to say that it's so called anti abortion, they're fine with that. They don't like to use word trafficking because you know it's got a negative connotation. Rightfully so, but that is the truth. Ten Republican lawmakers approved that just a day prior, and that version supporters are hoping to stop adults from helping young children obtain abortions with that permission from their parents or guardians, and that evil. Why would the Tennis the

evil Tennessee legislature, why would they? Why would they prohibit strangers who don't know or love the kids as well to do something that's going to be very harmful for them. And of course trafficking and things like that are appropriate because planned parenthood in these other organizations, even when it's a minor, if a miner is pregnant, that is statutory rape. We've always understood in our law that under a certain age, miners really cannot consent because they don't have fully

developed judgment. That's why children don't have rights. Parents have rights. Miners can't consent to certain things, they can't drive cars, they can't have guns and all this stuff because they're not mature enough. Why do we get away from that? Unbelievable, how insane this is, And so speaking about a Republican representative, Brian Ritchie, the sponsor of the bill, co sponsor of the bill, said, this is a parent's right bill, parents rights bill,

nothing more, nothing less. And of course the parents the idea of children's rights is another one of these UN things to destroy the family. And this goes back well, I was doing commercials about it fifteen years ago for the Parents Right, the Parntal Printal Rights Amendment Group, but the UN wanted to emphasize children's rights because they wanted to be able to directly work with kids without parents around. That's the type of thing that abusers do. Don't tell

your parents right, that type of thing. But that's where this is coming from. It's coming from the UN. The US never signed on to the UN Convention for the Rights of the Child, and yet you have all of these different institutions have been acting as if we had the same way they do. With the Paris Climate of court. Nobody ever pretended that there was a de facto signing of that treaty, but they have always acted that way judges

and courts and others. And so who's on the opposite side of printal rights? This group called Human Rights Campaign, always pushing the LGBT stuff, always opposed to parents. Why because they're pedophiles who want to mutilate children if they can't kill them. Planned parenthood wants to take part and profit from their mutilization, and so these people to try to cut the parents out of the equation, classic pedophilia. DeSantis is vowing to defy these new Title nine rules coming

from the Biden administration. The Democrat pedos. It's what really characterizes them, bribery with federal funds. That are there new language from the Biden administation reconfiguring the Title nine to protect students on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity. They've removed sex and they put in gender. And so what is going to happen with this? It's all about the money. This is why I said to everybody. What is so important about what Trump did with that emergency

order on Friday the thirteenth, was to release the funds. This is the way they entice people to do what they want to do, and it's the way they punish people. They bribe and they blackmail, the carrot and the stick, and anybody that understands anything about government knows that's how they all operate. And so governors do it to local jurisdictions, Well, we'll give you some state funds if you do this, or we'll take the state funds away

if you don't do that. And people who don't know anything about politics, who are into this cult of celebrity worship, like the Trump Maga cult, they don't understand how this works, and they still don't see it, and they will argue with you endlessly about it. But there is no argument. And I even use this very example, I said, do you understand how

this works? When Obama wanted boys in the girls bathroom and the girls shower, he used the power of the purse, these all these different jurisdictions that already gotten addicted to the money, and so he decided, well, I'm

going to pull it back. So what's going to happen, I think, is that DeSantis and other people are going to have to understand that we're not going to be blackmailed with our own money, and they're going to have to find another way to fund their schools without relying on federal funds, or they will, you know, if they'll have to do what these people tell them to do. If they want the money, that's what they're going to do

to them. So locker rooms bathrooms at schools that accept public funding are about to become dangerous places for women. This is one of the reasons why I don't support charter schools. You know, they're going to tie all of this stuff. It's all ways tied to the money, the money and the strings that come with it. And you know, who would have ever thought that the sniffer would do something like this is what democrats always do. It defines

them. So beginning in August is when they're going to run this thing out. Takes effect August first, for the next school year. Teachers can be accused of discrimination for mis gendering students, not using their pronouns, and that schools will have to allow biological men who identify as females to use women's bathrooms and locker rooms. This is an obsession with these degenerates that we call democrats.

Even in states that have passed legislation protecting women's private spaces. This is the very purpose of the Department of Education, the money, the social engineering via current Fiat currency. By the way, as we look at this, I probably won't have time to get into the economic issues I was talking about, just real briefly. The key thing that I'm seeing in a lot of different places, all these people saying the Federal Reserve is losing its ability to

manipulate things because of inflation and massive debt as like. Of course, we've seen this before. Anybody that remembers the seventies, they lost their ability to do it. The way I refer to it as the Wizard of Oz up in the balloon. Wait, wait, come back for me. I can't. I don't know how it works. Inflation got the better of the Wizard of Oz as well. And so these wizards who are the Wizards of DC, they once they inflate this balloon enough, they can't bring it back,

and they never know where it's going to go either. And so central banks all around the world are raising the flag about that. But central banks one thing they can do, and they are doing, is accumulating gold. So maybe you ought to learn something about that. But if you want to do that. Davidknight dot Gold Tony who was on yesterday, always a great support of the show. I really do appreciate his support. And if you go David Night Gold, if you want to accumulate gold or silver, he can

do it gradually with a wolf pack there. That lets him know that you're coming through us. Let me say real quickly here on Rumble, miss Kou, thank you very much. That's very kind. Marky, Mark New Jersey, thank you. He writes here something for the tank. Thank you, Sprumford, thank you for the tip. Have a good weekend. David God bless you and your family. On Rumble, it's Pliskin and we thought he was dead. Have a great weekend. Thank you so much for all of

that. Just a little bit more of this, just in case you ever thought that the Democrats like the rule of law, due process. Another part of this social engineering thing that's going to kick in. If you're going to take the money, we're going to tell you what you got to do beginning in August. Also, when the students are accused of sexual assault, they will not have a right to cross examine their accuser or or witness, which

is violation, of course, of the due process rights. But we don't care about that in America anymore, do we, And of course Speaker Johnson doesn't care about that either. Warrantless searches, no due process. Trump didn't take the gun. Do the due process later, Well, then it's not due process. Schools are directed to use the much lower standard of a quote preponderance of evidence to convict the kids. And these are regulations. Again,

it's not a law. Wasn't produced by Congress. This is produced by the Department of Education under Biden, part of the deep state, the bureaucratic state, part of the executive branch. It is the Biden administration, just like it was the Trump administration all of that time. Fifteen and seventy seven pages, again, bigger than a typical Bible. It's unbelievable the amount of regulations

that are being cranked out by these people who are unaccountable to everyone. I remember one of the events that we covered it will was there was a Senate candidate and there was several of them there. It was a party event, and they did have some people there from the Democrat side, but there's one guy who was organizing it, and he was going to shred the tax code, and so he rented a big paper shredder and he wanted to feed the tax code through it. But he called the I R. S. And

they couldn't tell him how many pages the tax code was. He kept calling it. Nobody knew. It's gotten so big, they don't know. So he just took a guess and did you know, a couple of dozen or whatever telephone books and it was pretty impressive. One last got here on flower so er on rumbled, Thank you very much, says thanks night, family and super Fay. Thank you so much, all of you for your support is very kind and thank you, especially to super Fay who got this ball

going. Thank you all of you have a great weekend. Thank you again. Stirring of biased and false neoze has become all too common on social first unfortunately, the exactly and this is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.

This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Break free from the usual script with a David Knight Show, a fresh perspective bringing you genuine insights on current events. But if the show is going to stay on the air, we'll need your continued support. Sharing the

show, subscribing and even just hitting the like button all help. And if you found our show helpful, please consider donating and becoming a part of a community that values the truth because independent listener funded news, untouched by corporate globalist agendas is extremely important to our liberties. And by Michael and I wanted to just jump in here and thank Edward b on Zell who sent a big donation. Thank you so much. I appreciate that. Thank you very much. Have a good weekend, everybody,