Fri 21Jun24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

Using free speech to free minds. You are listening to the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Friday, the twenty first of June. He're of our Lord, two thousand and twenty four. Well, today there is a massive cyber attack that is happening with car dealerships across the US

and Canada's about fifteen thousand car dealerships. I was alerted to this by a listener and it's been going on for a couple of days, and it quietly happened I guess around Wednesday, and the company that was supplying this information all these different car dealerships started getting involved with it yesterday. So we're going to talk about that because it is a bigger deal for everybody. It's the centralization

that makes us so vulnerable. Of course, today we're going to be talking to Jack Lawson about prepping and we're going to have him take a look at the UK has just discovered prepping. Nobody's doing it. It's kind of a funny article from the Telegraph about how to prep we'll take a look at that as well. As I did get to this yesterday. We're going to take a look at the idiots who tried the spray paint Stonehenge orange. Now they've

tried to paint Taylor Swift's plane. They couldn't find it though. Surprise,

Yeah, not a surprise. These people couldn't find it. They can't even figure out which way the wind is blowing, as I pointed out when I tweeted this out a couple of days ago. But first, let's talk about this car dealership cyber attack. This is a massive cyber attack on a company called CDK Global. Whenever you centralize things, you make it all vulnerable. See. This is again, besides the specifics of this case, this is

something that has happened across our society. Everything has become so centrally controlled, so dependent on computers, and so accessible for criminals anywhere, or for foreign governments anywhere as well. I don't think this is a foreign government attack. This has all the hallmarks of ransomware. I mean, it's not really going

after our infrastructure. It's attacking a large group of auto dealers there and nobody in the hacker community has claimed responsibility for it, but everybody believes that it is ransomware. CDK Global is not saying anything about it, but They provide software to over fifteen thousand dealerships in the US and Canada, and without this they can't do credit checks, they can't do anything. They're completely dependent upon this. I'm the listener who sent this to me. Brandon said, it's

not good. It's been down for two days. This is the third day. Everything is being done on paper and manually. Some dealerships have just said, well, we can't do anything. But I think in this difficult market, you're not going to pass it up. You're going to do it on paper. We had situations where we would have snowstorms or something like that, but we'd still keep the video store open forty years ago and people would try way to get there. They'd find a way to walk in the snow because

we didn't have really any snow removal there. It happened so infrequently, but they would find a way to walk to the grocery store get milk and bread, and then they would go to the video store get something. Even if they didn't have power, they would still go get a movie. But usually didn't lose power. By the times that we did, we would do everything by paper and then we'd have to catch it up later on. So it sounds like it's ransomware attack, but we don't have any confirmation on it.

Supposedly both of cdk's data centers are affected. The earliest will be up as Saturday, but it could be a week or more. Yeah, what I was seeing CDK saying publicly it could be several days. It's absolutely insane. Our CFO said he heard from another CFO at a different group that it was in fact ransomware in that CDK paid the ransom and some stuff was restored. Then the attackers increased the price and CDK said no more, and afterward the

attackers locked everything back down. Now the FBI is supposedly involved, well that should fix it. You know, they get the FBI on, they'll have this thing solved in no time at all. You're really trouble. If you got the FBI involved, they're not gonna be able to do anything. As a matter of fact, that it's just the babbling b satire that just talking

about how rogue and stupid the FBI has become. But rogue. They showed pictures of a shooting range and instead of the you know, they got the little clips where you clip the target could be a typical bullseye target, or it could be silhouette of a person and you send it down the range and you know, twenty five feet or whatever, and you shoot at it and then you bring it back to get your your target and clip that. Well,

the picture says they've now replaced the targets with the constitution. The constitution hanging down with holes shot by the FBI. But anyway, getting back to this, so it's been a rough two days. Now it's up to three and for everybody with no hope in sight, fifteen thousand auto dealerships in the US and Canada, an additional fifteen thousand heavy truck dealers surmize and everything else

like things that are all screwed right now. I heard cdk's competitors have been visiting CDK stores to take advantage of this situation, trying to get them to switch providers. Well, it truly is amazing. But just understand, folks, this is not limited to this industry. We keep seeing this happening from one industry to the other. This is not limited either to just criminal ransomware attacks. We're incredibly vulnerable to foreign attacks on our infrastructure. Who would do

that? Enemies all over the world. All right, look at what's happening right now in Russia. What is Russia? What are Russia and Ukraine doing. They're launching missiles at each other's infrastructure. They're trying to take out refineries, They're trying to take out power stations and all the rest of this stuff. And of course it's very easy to do that electronically, isn't it. And of course the border is wide open. If you want to come in

with some rifles and shoot up some transformers. It does the same thing. We're extremely vulnerable and with everything that's centralized, and again just taking a look at the power when everything is on a highly centralized power grid, that means that we're very vulnerable to this, to any kind of attack, any kind of you know, emergencies like this, and we need to be able to prepare for it individually. And that means not just temporary preparation, but more

long term things. For example, like I said many times, I don't like solar for the grid. It's really you know, it's like, well, to people who have only got one tool everything, you know, only have a hammer, everything looks like a nail, right, And to use solar on the grid. It's like, you know, trying to hammer everything. It's not the appropriate tool for that. It's a great tool if you want to get independent of the grid, but it's not a good tool for

the grid. Anyway, back to this, the I would Automobiles Dealership Association. It is reported that about a quarter of it's two hundred and seventy member dealerships are affected by the cyber attack. As I said before, it began on June nineteenth, really nothing happened that day. In response, nothing happened the next day. CDK is now saying that they're working on this to bring things back, but of course inside information, this is what's publicly put out.

The inside information is that they did pay some ransomware, then they decided that they wanted more. They didn't pay that, so then they went back and locked everything down again. So a lot of disruption, a lot of chaos, and a lot of dealerships that are processing stuff by hand, just kind of going with a seat of the pants estimates as to whether or not somebody is credit worthy because they can't get into that evidently as well, I

guess that all runs through this particular system. So a very disturbing situation's happening there, Jason Barker, how did we ever sell cars before the internet? Exactly? For computers? I had to go back and look at some of the videotapes about that VHS figure out how we did it. It is amazing, isn't it? How vulnerable and dependent we have become, How we are unable apparently to do anything on our own. This is a video of a woman ninety one years old, and she has been in business for about sixty

years. It was some time in the nineteen sixties that she opened up this location, this Arby's in Hollywood, and now she has been put out of business. This was sent to me by Tony said the final nail in the coffin was the twenty dollars an hour minimum wage. But she mentioned a couple of other things that I thought were very interesting as well. All that Plywood closing the book on the Arby's franchise, which opened on January fifth of nineteen

sixty nine. Once it was the only fast food restaurant on Sunset Boulevard that actually had a view of the Hollywood Sign. But nature and urban evolution has put a sunset on that view, and now the Arby's Roast Beef Number one fifty is closing. Ninety one year old original owner Marilyn Leviton shares her emotions and thoughts on the store's demise. I think it was the pandemic that did us in. I really feel we would have closed during the pandemic except for

the federal loans. Our biece is demanding more technical equipment, which we couldn't afford. And I don't think the twenty dollars an hour wage increase helped either. I'm awfully sorry that it came to this. I think we did a good job for fifty Yeah, for fifty five years, had that and so you know, just think about this. Most businesses don't last beyond five years. Hers lasted for fifty five years. She knows what she's doing. She's

still pretty really sharp, ninety one years old. Yeah. So, as she mentioned three things, the first one that nearly did them in was Trump's lockdown. You see, people like her, independent small business owners who have poured their blood, sweat and tears into this thing, their labor and their capital, they don't matter. They don't matter. In fact, I was just furious about that on the day I got fired. Reaching against Trump for

doing that. I think it's the most despicable thing I've ever seen in my life what he did. And to add insult injury to call them non essential, No, those people are essential. Unfortunately, those are the people who typically support Trump. And so she said, yeah, you know, they gave me the COVID cash and that helped a little bit. But see, the COVID cash now has turned into this giant avalanche of a snowball that is threatening all of us. And so that was no solution. The lockdown was

no solution. Even if it had been a real pandemic, it was no solution. But it wasn't a real pandemic. The COVID cash and the Trump trillions that were spent, which established a pattern that we're going to do trillions, and we're now adding a trillion every hundred days or so to the debt. It's absolutely insane that other Trump president, you know, he did a bump stock and he also bumped the debt, the debt incredibly. But anyway, she was non essential, but she kind of made it through that,

but they're still struggling. Then two other things happened at the same time. She's got the franchiser. You know, Arbi's telling the individual franchisees like her that they got to buy a bunch of new equipment. It's probably a bunch of nonsense like computers and artificial intelligence to take orders as people are driving through. But I said from the very beginning that I think Newsom's twenty dollars an hour minimum wage as it was focused on businesses like hers. Remember they had

to be a business concern where they had typically fast food. We had eighty or more restaurants nationwide. Now they didn't have to own eighty of these as a franchise e. I think she only owns that one, maybe, but Arby's is included. Because there's so many different rbs everywhere. And I said, that's a really strange way to do this, And that is happening as the people in Silicon Valley are pushing very hard to find an app that they

can use their robots hooked up to AI. And we've seen all the different demos. Everybody's got one of a robot that's preparing food and so forth.

And I said, I believe that Newsom is doing this to provide a essentially a prod for these companies to start mandating these robot chefs for all the different franchises, an investment of more capital, which many of them don't have, because, like her, she's just hanging on by a thread after what Trump did to her made it fifty five years, well, fifty years or so

until Trump came along. What a son of a gun he is anyway, and then Newsom, you're going to raise the artist, raise the minimum wage, and then the franchise is going to tell them they've got to get more automated equipment and all the rest of this stuff. She just says, I'm done between this kind of fascist program, this alliance between big tech and Newsom to screw these people down. You know, she can't handle anyway. She's ninety one. Yeah. As a matter of fact, play the McDonald's AI

video. This is what it looks like when they demoed it at a convention, and I'll kind of give you a I'll show you what it doesn't do. Go ahead and run it. What can I do for you? Yes, I am called okay? Now number two, there's three different options. It doesn't for you, doesn't ask for clarification. An apple pie. She wants an apple pie. That's not putting the apple pie there, and so the person who's there with the what else would you like? She doesn't Your

total is nine ninety four at the page. Okay, now let me us what can I get for you? Here? That what can I get for you? You know, same type of voice that you saw from that open AI rote about what was it called prime or something like that, Hey man, what you doing? You know, this is California dude voice. This is kind of a little bit raspy California speak, you know, in this thing. And so she orders a number two, and there's three different options

for number two, but she doesn't ask which one of those three. She just speaks one. Now she says, I'd like to have an apple pie. Uh, And then nothing happens, and the woman standing next to her who is demoing this to the franchisees who were watching it. So sometimes it takes a little bit of time. Well, it didn't take any time for the first one, especially because it didn't ask her for any clarification as to

which one of the three options for number two she wanted. And so then it waits for a while and then it goes, okay, what else would you like? And it doesn't put that there. It was a comedy of errors, and yet a lot of money wasted on that. The franchise's as well as the franchiser. And that's what's going to be happening. And you're going they've got partners with the government nudging it along to make it too expensive to have humans go buy the robots. You know. Yeah, it's going

to take some capital. Hey you don't have enough capital, Well maybe you shouldn't be a franchise, eh. Jason Barker said, I was talking to guard about this yesterday about the the heck of the auto dealership. So we've become too reliant on connectivity and digitization before I retired from there. If the Internet went down, they just send us home. Can we not go to war without the internet? Now? It says in thirty years we put all

of our eggs and a digital and fragile basket. That's exactly right, Jason Again, Jason, the Knights of the Storm and Foxhole report, we can find in both of those places. Let's talk a little bit about civil asset forfeiture because we've had some Supreme Court cases that have come this week, and we've got a lot more that are teed up to happen. Usually the Supreme Court clear as you know, these cases by the end of June, and we're getting really close to that, and so there's going to be a lot

of decisions coming at us very quickly. But let's take a look first at this decision about civil asset forfeiture. The headline from the Gateway Pundit says highway robbery. Well, that is exactly what it is. It's been called a form of highway robbery by many. That's it's literally highway robbery. And we've seen this. The the San Bernardino Sheriff's Department was literally robbing a armored car. They did it three times. The third time these guys are ready for

them. They didn't have anything in there, and they recorded these shriff's deputies talking about, man, I thought we're going to get like a million dollars out of it. This isn't because we did before, you know, that type of thing. And of course it's not two rogue deputies, the entire shriff's department. It is criminal, and it is a criminal collusion between these

local sheriff's departments and the federal government. The federal government keeps pushing it and giving them saying, you know, you steal this stuff and we'll give you eighty percent of it. We'll keep twenty percent because you know that's we're going to protect you, give you legal cover for your theft. A bunch of

thieves. That's why I say the war on drugs, the way that it has corrupted our court, the way it has corrupted our law enforcement, and this particular case, the corruption has gone all the way up to the Supreme

Court, because that's what this is. It's nothing but corruption. It was Lysander Spooner who said many years ago he was a libertarian up in New England open up a competition to the postal service and was killing them, and so they had to put some new laws in to protect the postal service from one

guy who went into competition with him that was so inefficient. But he said, the difference between government and a highway robber is that a highway robber will steal your property and then go his own way, whereas the government will steal your property and follow you down the road, nagging you. This is the guy who was back in the middle of the eighteen hundreds. He was there at the time of the civil War. So the government is constantly robbing us

today. We call it civil asset forfeiture. That's what we call highway robbery, and it's the police. What was there was not specifically civilized at forfeiture, although implicitly the Supreme Court supported that. What was at stake here was the fact that they were robbing people and then these people could not get a hearing to try to get their property back. And remember, these people have not been charge of the crime. Their property has been charge of the crime.

You'll see things like the US government versus one thousand dollars cash, or the US government versus this car, and they'll have the vehicle ID number for it. That's what you see. They're charging inanimate objects with crime and arresting these inanimate objects. It's so ridiculous. This is as absurd as the training movement. It's as absurd as the furry movement. But this is our government doing it, and this is Republicans as well as Democrat doing it. And

they've been doing it for a long time. I'll pointed out many times, going back to the beginning of this Sandy Hook thing, had Meghan Kelly come to do a report that they were going to roll out as they rolled out the charges the lawsuit against Alex Jones. And so she came in and she interviewed all of us, and I made it very clear that I didn't support Trump at that time and said why not? I said, well, civil as sip war for your men. These I started going listening a whole bunch

of things. And when I got to civilize at four, she said what is that? And I said, you know, well, I was absolutely amazed. You know, here's this talking head on Fox News that get paid like twenty five million a year and she has a legal background as well. She doesn't know about it. Excited her. She didn't care about it. They don't care. It's the practice of police by using delayed tactics where they confiscate cash, jewelry, cars, other valuables from people who are frequently completely

innocent. They're never charged. First of all, these people have not been convicted. They've not been charged. Their inanimate object property that's been stolen has not been charged either, and it's not been convicted. The so called asset forfeiture cases and why they call it civil. They call it civil because there is no law. You see, we allowed the civil asset forfeiture thing to run now for quite some time, it piggybacked off of the Rico Statutes,

which by the way, is now being used against Rudy Giuliani. And I think it is perfectly fitting since he built his career as a prosecutor before he became mayor. He built his career on using RICO. And I don't care if he is using it to lock up the bad guys. The worst thing that can happen is if the government becomes criminal, if the government become lawless. If the government is lawless, that's far more dangerous to us than the

Corleone family because it is so much bigger. And so when the government becomes organized crime, that's the worst case scenario. And that's what Rudy Giuliani turned it into. And then of course he used that to become mayor. He used nine to eleven and his cover up of nine to eleven to become famous, and then he ran for president and things like that. But anyway,

he's now being charged or the Rico Statute. But out of the Rico statute grew civil asset forfeiture, and they put civil in there because this is something that is a rule not a law. Oh where have we seen that before. Well, for the last four years, we have been ruled by bureaucratic rules, not by any laws that were passed by our elected representatives. And so when you have the irs, or you have the dea, or anybody sets up this rule presumption of innocence, you have no due process. They

can even charge and arrest inanimate objects with their ridiculous civil rules. They said, this is the core of the issue. Nobody is talking about the legal foundation of prevarications that were what they built all this stuff on that they did to us in the last several years. So this is a six to three decision of the Supreme Court, unfortunately, and they said that the justices held there are quote no due process protections for citizens and asset for for sure proceedings.

Well, we kind of knew that, didn't we. And there's no due process protections that have an early court hearing. That's the part that they were really focused on. I should have a speedy trial. No, you don't have any due process. We just take the property and we do the process later. Maybe maybe well not due process, but that's why our government works. You see, Trump knows how the government works. Pelosi knows how the government works as well. So we've got to pass the laws to find

out what's in it. Right, they don't write the laws. They let the bureaucracy rite the law. And due process that's a historical thing that we've moved on from. Trump understands that. So the idea that you've got due process protections to have an early court hearing to contest the government keeping possession of their seized property while they await a trial. They haven't been charge of anything,

they have to sue in civil court. They have to sue the government to get their property back, and they have to show that they're innocent, that the property is innocent. Lawyers for the rough of the Ford Institute were joined by those from the ACLU people both left and the right to argue that an early hearing was needed to protect citizens against the government's delay tactics. Neil Gorsich said that it is a problem to have the police delay proceedings and keep

citizens private property for as long as a year or more. He said it could coerce the owners to settle the dispute by paying a penalty for property that they need for their work or that they love or whatever. Right, Well, that's exactly what it's about, you know. It's about coercion. It's about saying, well, you know, I'm not really violating the law. I'm just delaying this and all the rest of this stuff. And it's categorically wrong. It is a violation of all due process, and the Supreme Court

doesn't care. That's how corrupted our government has become by prohibition, by prohibition that was never passed with a constitutional amendment, like alcohol prohibition was. The majority over ruled him six to three. Americans no longer have to be guilty to be stripped of their property, of their rights, and of their liberties,

warned John Whitehead, who is president of the ruthernfer An Institute. He said, you only have to possess something that the government wants, or you know, if you've got a business like that McDonald's, then they just want to shut you down. Well, you don't have any due process for that's just going to lock you down. Yep, yep, that's what it is,

says jab Cinda. Asset forfeitures become a booming business for the government, with federal forfeitures alone having brought in two point five billion dollars during twenty eighteen.

So the lastset forfeiture is a practice where government agents, usually the police, sees private property they suspect maybe connected to criminal activity, and then, whether or not any crime is actually proven to have taken place, the government keeps the citizen's property, often divvying it up the local police who did the

initial seizure. Getting back to that San Bernardo department, you have a sheriff's department that three times robbed an armored truck under the pretense that this armored truck had gone to a marijuana store, which is legal in California. But the federal government said, going back to the Trump administration, Jeff Sessions, you go ahead and keep doing that civil asset for for sure, and we'll give you a legal cover and we'll give you eighty percent of whatever you steal.

So they kept coming front at this armored truck company and stealing the cash from them. Armored truck company had committed no crime, the marijuana store had committed no crime. We have a criminal government. Yeah. See, property has no presumption of innocence. Government rules are not the same as laws passed by your elected representatives, and so you have no due process, you have no

presumption of innocence. Challenging these things in court can cost an owner more than the value of the confiscated property itself, which, as Justice Gorsich pointed out, is why agencies reportedly place special emphasis on seizing low value items and relatively small amounts of cash. In Chicago, they are confiscating cars. Well, I think this car, you know, it's probably used by somebody who is using drugs or something like that, So I'm just going to steal your car.

Most of the cars are only worth about one thousand dollars. They're going into the poor communities and they're stealing these cars. And if you want to contest this, it costs you nine hundred dollars to just file a lawsuit to try to get your property back. So they get cars that are around one thousand dollars to make sure that nobody contests any of this stuff. It is such an amazing criminal racket. Maybe we could charge the government with racketeering and

influence. Was it influenced corrupt organizations? You know, they are a corrupt organization, our own government, and it is racketeering. So there were some

other things that are going to be coming out pretty soon. There's going to be more decisions about gun rights, about abortion access, about social media content, about homelessness, federal regulatory authority, about the opioid crisis, and then of course whether Trump and other people affiliated with January sixth can be prosecuted and some of the charges that they have brought against them, And so most of the stuff will probably come out right about the time or a little bit before

the debate which is scheduled for June twenty seventh, between these two avatars, probably the best way we could describe it, a couple of puppets avatars representatives for the two crime families behind them, the Republicans and the Democrats. Trump has touted the three appointments he made that gave the court a super majority of conservatives as one of his top accomplishments as president, but his campaign was they

call it circumspect. They're pretty much silent about the bump stock being overturned, And they also didn't have much to say, if anything, about a challenge to the abortion pill that was thrown out by his Of course, that one

was really that was a unanimous decision. And even though I don't support the abortion pill, and I think many of at least several of them on the Supreme Court would not support it the UH and not support the idea that it could be mailed out, that it could be handed out over the counter to women who have not had an exam to see whether or not they could safely

take it. Nobody cares about women's health. He as abortionistone. But in this particular case, this case was brought by people who didn't prescribe the pill, didn't sell the pill, and all this, they really didn't have any standing. I mean, it was a legal technical issue. Can Trump be prosecuted over accusation of trying to steal the twenty twenty election? This is one

of the things that's going to be up before then. Critics have said that the Court has taken so long to decide this that it will likely be impossible for a trial to conclude before the November election, even if a majority rule. But Trump is not immune from prosecution. And then you have other You have the January the sixth defendants that Trump left twisting and the wind instead of giving them a pardon. As I pointed out before, we have historical precedents.

Gerald Ford pardoned Nixon before he was charged for anything, and going back to the Civil War, which is where this Insurrection Act came from, then President Andrew Johnson, who took over from Lincoln, hardened all the people who had been involved in the Civil War. He basically shut down that effort by Congress to get revenge and gave them a pardon before they were charged with anything. So another case deals with obstruction charges that has been applied to one fourth

of defendants on January the sixth, and also against Trump. This particular case, though, is the case of Joseph Fischer, a former police officer from Pennsylvania. He entered the Capitol and was charged with obstructing Congress. The issue is whether or not the law making obstruction a crime was meant to apply only to the destruction of documents rather than to interrupting a public meeting. Three hundred and fifty out of the first thirteen hundred and fifty defendants from January to sixth

were charged under the obstruction law. It's just amazing to me to see how many people Trump left twisting in the wind. It's equally amazing and despicable that the Biden FBI would still be out there, still searching for more and more people and still arresting them and charging them even this year. Just amazing. My conscience is cleared. I did everything I could to tell people, even on Alex's show when he was grifting and pushing this thing. I told people,

it's a grift. You're not going to be able to do anything on January sixth. It's just going to get you entrapped. There's going to be agent provocateurs there. And I said it from that day up to the morning of January sixth, I was telling you, boy, stay away. It is a trap. Trump wants to make money, Alex wants to make money. They're selling you a hopeless idea. And now they're doing it all again. And you've got people like Steve Bannon, Jack p Soviet as well as

Alex jumping into this again. They're already preparing for January sixth, even earlier than they did the last time. It's amazing. It's amazing. You know. I don't like talking about it because I have always say, oh, you're a bitter old man. It's like, no, I'm not a bitter old man. I know what these people are doing. I call people that knowing I was going to get fired and I'll do it again. I don't care if people turn it off. I don't care what they think about me.

I've had people who have written me saying that they didn't go because they heard me say that, and they were cautious. But I have to warn people if I see something like that, I wouldn't you You know the people I worked with, wouldn't that tells you something. If you saw somebody about to step out in front of a bus, wouldn't you say something? No, these people, you would. But these people I work with, they

would grab a video camera and say, hey, watch this. We're going to get on YouTube, and they'd film you getting run over by a bus. That's what he did. That's what Trump did, That's what Alex did. Anyway, abortions our emergency abortion is allowed in states with strict bands. This is an Idaho case. The issue is is that they're allowed to save

the life of the mother, but not the health of the mother. This is I guess this gray area that they want to get this corrupt Supreme Court to give them a decision on. Is a law banning domestic abusers from having guns constitutional? What is at issue here is whether or not I guess the person who has a restraining order put against them, is that the same as having a conviction? You know where this could be assessed as a punishment.

If the Supreme Court rules that a law banning domestic abusers fromoaning guns is not consistent with past regulations and therefore violates the Second Amendment, it would be a continuation of the Conservative Court's expansion of gun rights, even for potentially dangerous people. But such a decision could also help the present son Hunter, who was victed this month of lying about his drug use and buying a Revolver in twenty

eighteen. Biden has argued that the case is unconstitutional under the Supreme Court's twenty twenty two decision. Hunter Biden has argued that not Joe Biden. Joe Biden has spent his entire career trying to abolish every aspect of the Second Amendment. And so what is an issue here is can the Court keep adding different infringements to the Second Amendment to such as well, if you are a drug user, you can't get a gun that type of thing. Can social media content

moderation be restricted? There are three cases about social media censorship. The Court is deciding whether the Biden administration and properly leaned on social media platforms to remove postings on COVID nineteen, on the twenty twenty elections, and other issues that it considered to be disinformation. In other court cases, the Court is deciding if laws passed by Texas and Florida to limit the ability of powerful social media

companies to moderate content are constitutional. Look, I don't know why nobody pulls this stuff up. I mean I talked to Robert Barnes about this when I was at Info Wars and we talked about it on air, and I said, it seems to me like this is clear a clear It was clear thinking when they did it. In nineteen forty six, the Supreme Court set of marsh versus Alabama, the public square even if it's privately owned. It was a coal town and the coal company owned the public square and had somebody passing

out religious tracks. I said, you can't do it. Well, this person took them all the way to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court said, even if the public square is privately owned, they can't stop it. As this was all happening, we had Jack Dorsey when he owned Twitter, went on over eight times in testimony, he sat under oath. Twitter is a digital public square, and it is. We know that, whether

or not he says that, we know that's true. Now, the argument that Robert Barnes is making other people have said is that, well, there's been subsequent to that. There's men hearings saying that you can't, you know, set up a soapbox and start doing things in the mall. The mall is not the public square. It's not the same thing. That is a completely different scenario. The Internet is not like the mall. The Internet is

like that coal town where the private public square was privately owned. That's the correct analogy, and so I guess they're not going to even take a look at that. Though the High Court is deciding whether an Oregon city can bar people who are homeless from sleeping outside of shelter is not available. Why is that something that the Supreme Court should even having diction over. That's a local issue. They don't have the authority to get involved in that. But you

know they've made a federal case out of it. You're going to make a federal case out of this, Yeah, everything federal government's regulatory powers will they be curtailed. The Court is expected to weaken and possibly overturn, a forty year old precedent that is guided how federal agencies protect the environment, workers, consumers, and war. Under what is known as the Chevron doctrine, courts have deferred to the agency's interpretation of a law if the statute isn't clear and

the interpretation reasonable. Critics say that it has given the executive branch too much authority. In the deep state, the executive branch has way too much authority. Defenders of the doctrine say that Congress can't anticipate every circumstance when, for example, writing laws to protect the environment, and subject matter experts of the agencies are needed to fill in the blend if you're going to fill in the blanks. So what we're talking about is what Nancy Pelosi said, Well,

we kind of pass Obamacare to find out what's in it. What they're doing is they're passing and giving broad powers to the bureaucracy, so the bureaucracy can fill in the devilish details. Look, if you can pass broad principles that are there, you don't need to give them the ultimate power over what to put in this is backwards thinking. This is not This is the way that you destroy freedom by giving the legislative authority regulation without representation. You give that

to the bureaucracy. And yes, that is the way that it has been going for a very long time of the Chevron doctrine. Will the Supreme Court do anything about it? I seriously doubt it will. A multi billion dollar settlement over opioid crisis survive. This is a cycler family, Purdue Pharmaceutical,

oxy Cotton, this massive opioid epidemic that even roped in rush Limbaugh. The vast majority of victims supported the settlement with Purdue Pharmaceutical, but the Justice Department stepped into the case to question where the courts could shield the Sacklers from future civil lawsuits, a practice that has been used and major bankruptcies dealing with harms

caused by asbestos and silicon breast implants. While the case deals with the technical question of bankruptcy law, which is always federal, there are wrenching stories not far below the surface, involving Americans who have lost children, spouses, parents to a crisis that claimed about eighty thousand lives in twenty twenty two alone, and then we get to the big cahuna, the last one we'll talk about

here before we take a break. The Supreme Court saved a Trump tax and the question is is it going to who is this action going to enable or is it a threat to a wealth tax that Biden and Elizabeth Warren want to put in. And this is really what we're looking at, you know, besides civil asset forfeiture and that bad six to three decision, this I think is also an egregious violation and one of the most closely watched cases of this

term. The Supreme Court upheld a major piece of the twenty seventeen Trump Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on Thursday, rejecting a challenge that threatened to shred much of the current tax system. And this one, it wasn't sixty three, It was seven to two, and you only had Clarence Thomas and Gorsch who said what I think was the correct decision. So what was at stake here?

The one person who is a senior fellow of the Tax Policy Center said, well, this preserved our income tax system because this case really could have upended everything. Oh so it's based on pragmatic considerations. We don't care about preserving the constitution, justice, the rule of law. No, no, no, we've got to preserve the income tax in the irs. Why it doesn't You don't care what the deficit is anymore? Right, Republicans and Democrats

don't care. Just take a look at Machiavelli and Mike. He doesn't care what the deficit is anymore. The Democrats are even more explicit about it. They've moved on from Kenesy and economics. Now they've got MMT modern monetary theory or the magic money tree, where, hey, it doesn't matter. None of this stuff matters. The debt doesn't matter, and the income tax doesn't come anywhere close to paying the debt. And we're adding a trillion dollars every

one hundred day, So why do you need the income tax? They need it to keep us down. They needed to give themselves power to confiscate from us. And that's what this decision is about. That Trump did this tax situation that he did. So what is the case specifics? You had a Washington couple who got a fifteen thousand dollars tax bill thanks to their part ownership of a friends firm that sold farm equipment in India, even though the business

had not distributed any of its cash profits back to investors. That's called unrealized gain. Donald Trump taxed people on unrealized gain. Yeah, talk to me about tips. Talk to me about having him lead an effort to rewrite the tax code. This is okay, you got a stock, Well, I think the stock's gone up in value. Pay the tax on this increase in value. That type of thing. That's where this leads where Biden and Elizabeth Warren wanted this to lead. Now, this the Supreme Court narrowed the decision

down to cast some doubt as to that. And as a matter of fact, based on what they said, there are four people in Supreme Court who would not support that kind of wealth tax. Well, you know, as I look here, you got some of this Nvidia stock and it went up. So I'm going to tax you on the profits right there, even though you haven't sold it. That's the insanity of this. So will that happen? Well, we know that there are four justices who are against that extension

of this, but they need to have five. Will they be able to pick up Kavanagh or Roberts. They're both pretty unreliable on this stuff, and so that remains to be seen. So they claim that this tax is unconstitutional, arguing that under the sixteenth Amendment, the IRS only has the power to touch income that has been realigned by taxpayers when they receive a dividend or when

they sell a stock. If the Court had agreed, it would have legally foreclosed several ideas that Democrats have put forward in recent years to tax billionaires, including the Biden administration's proposal to tax unrealized capital gains of anyone with a net worth over one hundred million dollars, or the more straightforward wealth tax championed by Focahontas Elizabeth Warren. And so the Supreme Court has now left this door open.

A former House Speaker Paul Ryan, at one point suggested that the court ruled in their favor, they would have to toss out about a third of the tax code. Hey, Paul, you should have done that when you're Speaker of the House. When you were Speaker of the House, you should have gotten rid of the irs. But you know, you look at what happens with these Republican speakers like Machiavellian Mike. What do they do? They are going to make the Machiavellium. Mike is even worse than Kevin McCarthy.

Kevin McCarthy was going to say, well you want it seven times bigger, I'm going to only make it five times bigger. Well, machiavelli and Mike is back to making it seven times bigger, just like Biden wanted to do. The court battled batted down this suit, ruling that the income in question had been realized when the company earned it, and for legal purposes, the government was allowed to attribute those profits to the shareholders of the partners of the

business. Only two conservative justices, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsich, dissented. Well, you want to talk about for legal purposes, it doesn't even make rational sense. In his opinion for the majority, Kavanaugh wrote the opinions, he's one of the people that, Oh, I don't know where's this guy going to be when they come for the wealth tax. You think it's for billionaires, folks. That's what they told everybody who in the institute the income

tax. It was it's for the richest of the riches, for the one percent of the one percent, and we're only going to charge them one percent tax. So don't worry about it. It's not a problem. It's not your issue. Now, it's a way age tax. They've extended that. That's the kind of well, I guess we could say bracket creep, because that's a part of it as well, you know, taxing you and their inflation getting you into higher and higher tax brackets even though you're not making any

more money. Kavan I emphasize the plaintiff's that failed to show how the repatriation tax was different from other pieces of tax law dealing with issues like partnerships and foreign profits. See that said, how's it different from these other ones? Oh, well, we want to keep all of them there, So forget about it, even if it's based on a fiction that you are going to be taxed on income you haven't received. He said, the constitution does not

require fyscal calamity. No, it just requires that you do what it says, and if that results in physical calamity, because you've got an unconstitutional system, so be it pragmatism. See what was it, I said in response to Scott Adams when he said these freedom lovers are looking more and more like sociopaths. I said, you pragmatists, people who represent yourself as pragmatists.

You pragmatists are looking more and more like catlitarians. The majority skirted the bigger question of whether Congress has the powered to tax unrealized income, with Kavanaugh stressing in a footnote that his analysis didn't address the distinct issues that would be raised if the government tries to impose a levy on wealth or assets that have gone

up in value. Brown Jackson specifically wants that to happen. Yeah. Yeah, So we're going to take a break when we come back, we're going to talk about guns on YouTube. They want to take them down, take down all these gun videos or make them inaccessible to people unless they log in, and you know, you've got to be over eighteen and all the rest of this stuff. So, yeah, my son said, when they said, well, get rid of about a third of the tax code, my

son said, well, that'd fixed about a third of it. Then Stephen Caspar, maybe that's how we could stop all the wars. Turn of the internet. Turn off the internet. Yeah, turn it off. That's right. Quite frankly, you know, when we look at this system that they got, I don't see any way that it's really going to ultimately be defeated. Except about absolute and total chaos, it's going to be You're going to have to completely in order to stop this surveillance state and biometric surveillance state.

Something's going to have to happen to completely shut down the Internet. The Internet is the backbone of this thing. It was designed by a psychologist at DARPA J. C. R. Licklider in the sixties. When it became practical in the nineties, they created the venture capital firms to put all these companies

in control. It's going to have to be something like that. It is a trojan horse and always has been, in the same way that everything that the federal government does is pretty much based on bribery and blackmail from the federal reserve fiat currency. It's going to be a big hardship for us to lose the Internet. It's gonna be a big hardship for us to lose the dollar as a reserve currency. But in the long run, it'd be the best

thing that could ever happen to us. Quite frankly, if we lose the reserve currency, it's gonna again it's gonna be a lot of economic hardship, but that is the superpower of this leviathan government that is at war with us and is right now the beast of Babylon. Jason Barker, can we civilize that forfeiture of the White House since we found cocaine there twice in the past year. Well, yes, under those laws, that's exactly what they would

do. But we don't have equal protection of the law. The laws do not apply to Democrats, especially the Bidens d G. Sadly, Trump is a huge advocate for civilized at forfeiture. That's right, whether or not it's in this uh, you know, whether or not it's in this country. Even you know, as I said, well, we just we're going to take the oil. We're there, We're going to take the that's kind of a civil asset forfiture thing, right, it'spiracy, it's theft. That's what

he supports. California sheriff's apartments says and sixty one have police gangs infused within them. I wouldn't be surprised, America and your property is guilty until proven innocent. Yeah, and you're gonna have to prove an innocent by suing them. Stephen Caspar When I think of cops now, I remember all the videos of them busting heads and pointing ars at people trying to run their small business during COVID. Jason Barker, the Supreme Court is only an opinion. It

carries no constitutional authority. The supremacy clause was self proclaimed. Thus it's not legitimate because that power was not enumerated about the states. Yeah, that's exactly right. So unless until we get rid of this idea of judicial supremacy, we're done. We didn't need to have Alido. I'm glad that he did it. We didn't need to have him write the Dobbs decision to know that the Supreme Court had no business deciding when life begins. They have no business

deciding what marriage is. That belongs to the states. And you know, when we talk about the marriage decision, for example, there had been efforts in every single state to legalize homosexual marriage and had failed in every single state. In California, you had Tim Cook doing spending millions of his own money and putting Apple there to give matching contributions for anybody who contributed to establish gay marriage in California, and it still failed in California. It failed everywhere,

and there were some places where marriage was defined in the state constitution. They took it to the Supreme Court to override all of that stuff. It shows how dangerous this idea of judicial supremacy is. I don't care what you think about homosexual marriage. Just take a look at how they violated the people, the power of the people that was reserved them under the Tenth Amendment. Look at how they reserve the power of the people on the power of the state

and homosexual marriage, and it shows you just how wrong it is. And when people saw the Alito decision on Roby Wade, they said, well, it's going to be coming for homosexual marriage because it's the same principle that's there. If you don't strongly resemble a bitter old man at this point, you weren't paying attention or you don't care. That's even worse. I look at these people. I even had Kelly mcbreen who worked at still works at INFO

Worse. Always had a good relationship with Keller mcbreen. It really amazed me when I put up stuff about you know, well, it's just sugar water and everything, and he put a comment under there. Once they put mam maam, like I'm a crying baby. Are you kidding me that sob that you're working for. I didn't even even know that he was doing that when

I was there. I said he did it once when I was on air, right as we're going off, It's like, wow, but I was told by people he's doing it. It's like, no, he's not doing that, but he did it. And you see that, and your response is to just say, well, yeah, cry baby about all this stuff. You better believe I cry about that. You better be crying about the people that were pressured into taking this stuff, that were killed, that were crippled. How in the world can you not be bothered by that. That's

why I played several of those yesterday. We can't forget about this, We can't sweep this under just like Temple, Well that was so four years ago. Let's talk about the election that was four years ago. He says, immediately goes into well, yeah, well he was cheated four years ago. You cheated people out of their lives, and you're chairing the man who did it. You're an accessory to that. To sixty won the Supreme Courts upholding our rights to sleep on the sidewalk. We go go for it, dudes.

Yeah, that's really important in the future. If these guys get their way, we'll all need those Supreme Court to sleep on the sidewalk. That's just the way it's. They're looking out for us. They know it's coming, and they're going to prepare this for us, so we have someplace to sleep on the sidewalk. Ap rumble seed us is done if we sit back and don't take action locally, Yes, to get our own people in instead of these hybrid inbred elites. Yeah, by his love. So this is

so depressing. Unrealized gain like arresting someone who might commit a crime, or stealing property of somebody who is not even accused of a crime. Yeah, this is the legal fiction that these people are involved in. I mean, you're going to do civil asset forfiture? Why not tax? Unrealized gain? Right, it's of a same type of principle that we have operating here. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. The common

man. They created common Core and dumbed down our children. They created common Past to track and control us, their Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.

They desire to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. The Davidnightshow dot com. Well, I had some fun a couple of days ago. I meant to talk about

this yesterday, but I didn't get around to it. These idiots who decided that they would spray Stonehenge orange just before the Pagan summer solstice. You have what we have here, folks. What we have here is a competition between two pagan religions. You got the religion of Gaia and you got the Druids and all the stepping on each other's It is something funny to watch. Actually, what was even funnier about this? As you look at these people here,

look at this. They've got this fire extinguishore large stuff, and as he's running and it's blowing back in his face. I said, these people are so stupid. These climate idiots are so stupid. There's supposed to be experts on weather and climate and they can't even tell which way the wind's blowing. They're gonna do this, get on the other side and run in, or wait till you get up there. I mean, it's just ridiculous. And then what do they have for security. They've got some five foot tall

woman who is trying, don't do that. Don't do that. Now they set down, and now this other guy picks it up and they said, please don't do that. Isn't that an amazing picture? How helpless we have become to do anything about this. I mean, you know, there are some times when you just need a big guy that's just gonna beat the crap out of these people doing something like that, instead of a woman running out of the five foot doll said please don't do that, Please don't do that.

It's just disgusting to see this. But you know, stonehinge is a really strange thing. Frankly, But before I say anything about that, these same people then okay, followed up. They went to a secure airport. This is a private airport. They you know, air Force One doesn't come into Heathrow and things like that, the big public airports. They go to this private airport. It's got security all around it and everything. And so these elites with their private jets, air Force one, all the rest of

them, they go to this particular jet. Well, Taylor Swift was flying into there, so they wanted to paint Taylor Swift's plane orange as well, and so they took pictures of themselves using a metal grinder to get through the fence and all the rest of the stuff. They got in and they sprayed a couple of planes. They didn't know which one was Taylor Swift. They didn't get her plane. It's the gang that can't shoot straight or can't paint

straight. I guess what the deal is with them. We had an experience with Stonehenge when we went there. We went to the UK on our honeymoon in January nineteen eighty. It was very cold. Nobody was out there. Back then. They didn't have ropes and stuff to supposedly keep you away from it. Just to walk right up you could touch it. If you wanted

to. Now everything has gotten so special, it's just disgusting. It's like, you know, so depressing to go back to Florida and to go to Daytona Beach where we used to be able to drive cars up and down the beach. You know, that's why I showing that bumper what it was like all my life before I moved away, Before everybody got so special about the beach. They used to you know, they used to race cars. That's

where the Daytona five hundred came from. It was originally a race that had one leg down the beach, another one down the highway I think is a one to a and then they had on the two sides where they connected those two they had really soft sand, which is a really difficult thing to navigate. But anyway, that's where the original car races began. Didn't destroy the beach racing cars on it. You know, when I was always going there,

they had speed limits. You couldn't go more than you know, ten miles an hour or something like that, but they will let you drive on it. And everybody was parking their cars out there. A lot of them would could not believe how far the tide would come in, so they'd park their cars there and going to the boardwalk and they come out and find that their car was submerged in salt water. And they had people who made a

pretty good living pulling people out as the water was coming in. But anyway, you're not even allowed, not even allowed, and they've just killed it completely Atana Beach, and I guess it's the same way with Stonehenge. But when we were there, there was nobody at all. This cold winter morning and nobody at all there, and we take this bus out there and we get off on this the Plane of Salisbury, which is a little bit of a rise where they built this thing, but you know, no trees or

anything for a long way, and so you're just out there. And Karen really got creeped out by it did feel weird. I don't know if there's something going on there or you know, what it is, but it did feel weird. And she was describing that too. It's always been a running family joke. She was describing it to a friend of ours and she said, oh, I hated it. There was no place to hide, and

he's like, no place, what do you mean by that? He's like, yea That's the first thing I look for when I go anywhere is where can I hide? But it was anyway, The Stonehenge was a strange face but place. But these people are even stranger and more superstitious than anything ever happened there. Meanwhile, we got Elon Musk saying that his neuralink brain implant will replace phones. Who needs to worry about sal phones creating tumors and your

brain? He'll make a tumor with his neuralink right there, Just put threads into your brain. You've already got the beginning of a tumor. My son says, well, the main thing all the members of your organization have in common is that they're gullible enough to fall for the climate propaganda to and extreme extent. Don't expect any combience from these people. Yeah, that's right. They really don't know which way the wind is blowing. So, yeah,

isn't that amazing? And don't you think it's totally worth it to have an operation and to put something with wires sticking down in your brain so that you can control your mouse with your thoughts, or so that you can make a phone call with your thoughts. So it's so twenty twenty to have a cell phone that you actually hold in your hand or something, isn't it. I mean, you want to have that direct neuraling thing. He's still looking for

that killer app. Or maybe he does have it. Maybe maybe that implant thing is a killer app. Maybe it'll know. But that's the most ridiculous thing I've seen. And yet even as he's saying that you could use neuralink, his neuralink to make phone calls, he's warning people about electronic voting machines. Well, I absolutely agree, and I've been talking about that for a long time before the MAGA crowd discovered it. I said, I'd been talking

about it in terms of local elections. We'd covered local elections where there was no there was concern about the auditing process. Under the Texas Constitution, you're supposed to have images that are preserved of this stuff. But we had the guy who ran the Board of Elections, somebody that Rick Perry brought in from

Hillary Clinton's Rose Law firm or the one. It wasn't her law firm, but she worked for it, brought brought this guy in and put him in charge of the Board of Elections, and he would every year, every election year, he would send out stuff to all of the different boards of elections of the county levels and tell them to ignore the Texas Constitution that says you've got to keep a visual image of this stuff. Oh, don't worry about

that this year. And every year he would do that, and so yeah, when I went to talk to him, you know, oh yeah, sure he'll come down, you know, press here to talk to him. He starts coming down the steps and I've got the microphone with a flag on it saying who I'm with, and he sees that, he goes no, no, no, and he goes back up. He runs away. That's the story of my life, I guess. Anyway, the and get any inviady to talk to me. I can't get on YouTube in these places.

But no, he understands the problem with these electronic voting machines. He said, the risk of being hacked by humans or AI, while small, is still too high. And of course the most recent one of these is in Puerto Rico and the vote counts that were happening there. They're reviewing their contract with Dominion after a software issue caused machines supplied by Dominion to miscalculate vote totals.

The vote counts according to the AP associated Propaganda. Vote counts reported by dominion machines were lower than paper counts in some cases, and some machines reversed totals or reported zero votes for some candidates. Oh well, no problem there. I'm sure it's just a little bit of a software problem, don't you think, I said, And I'd been covering this topic for quite some time.

I had talked about how outrageous it was it were still that they're adding these electronic voting machines, And I said, you realize one of the first companies, Smartmatic, was created in Venezuela by three pals of Hugo Chavez so they could rig the election, and they rigged every election from they're on for Yugo Chavez. And then when they started selling Smartmatic in other countries, we

had just like you're seeing here in Puerto Rico. They had big controversies and lawsuits and legislative hearings about how it was all wrong, the vote totals were wrong for particular elections that happened in the Philippines, it happened in Brazil, it happened in Mexican provinces, and everything. Now we now we got Puerto Rico, we can add to it. And Puerto Rico did this test and they said, this is so messed up. I think we're not going to

use this stuff. Just go back to paper ballots and election observers. Both parties in Puerto Rico reported hundreds of ballots showing inaccurate results. They had over seven hundred errors that was reported by one political party. The other political party

pointed to three hundred and fifty discrepancies. These inaccuracies affected ballots for positions including govern mayor and Resident Commissioner, all up and down the ballot, and as Elon Musk pointed out, the chances of it being hacked or having softwares or just you know, even though they are rare, right rare, kind of like a Boeing seven thirty seven. Macsy. We only had two of these things crash out of eighty two hundred, but that's too too many. And

same thing with this. Following the discrepancy, the Elections Commission conducted a full vote taally and they audited paper receipts from hundreds of ballot counting machines, after which Ombud's men edwin Feliciano called the incident a threat to the island's electoral system. That was his word, a threat, and he called on the governor in the island's federal control Board that oversees the island's finances to establish a plan

to improve election security. Let me just say one more thing with all of the back for it was done by all these idiots chasing their tail to try to get a Trump into the White House. Again, It's a very simple thing that could be done. You know, we have one organization that does exit polls everywhere for every news organization, and so they this one organization does all the exit polling and they give this you know, we hear the news reported from ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox News, CNN, all the

rest of stuff. They're all getting it from the same company. Now, the same company. When you know they're doing the exit polling, the last people information about them, you know, are you, you know, male or female or you some other gender? You know, the last this kind of stuff, and they might ask them some stuff about their education or something. We always see this reported and these exit polls. They will always give

us these demographic cross tabulations. Well, people who are middle class with a college education went for candidate A more than went for Candida B. That type of thing. You've seen that over and over again, Right, Why don't they ever tell you the full information just instead of breaking it down by demographic cross tabs. Tell me when you did your exit polling, how it worked out for candidate A and candidate B overall. They know that, they know

that, but they only give you the demographic tabulation. See our state department when it looks at whether or not it was a legitimate election, they look at the exit polls versus the reported results, and if they differ by more than five percentile points, they say the election was rigged. If you want to know if the American election is rigged, as a very simple solution, you just subpoena that company that did the exit poles. I've been saying this

from the very beginning. Yeah, you want to show that whether or not this is a rigged election in twenty twenty, use the same standard that the State Department uses for foreign elections. Subpoena this company and say show us your exit totals, your exit pole totals for these different places, and let's tot them up and see how they compare. It's real simple. But they won't do that, right. They won't do that because there's got to keep it.

They want to have it. They don't want honest elections. They want elections that they can win, elections that they can steal. And we're seeing that with a Trump organization as well. He doesn't care about the electronic stuff. I said in twenty sixteen, I said the next election twenty twenty, I said it is going to be a hacking contest. Well I was wrong, because not even in my wildest dreams that I ever think that anybody would be stupid enough to do a vote by mail election. Oh but Trump was,

and so Pal. You were hoisted by your own petard unless you were told to do that, unless you're told to hand the baton over to Biden. It was the dumbest thing I've ever seen in my life. The house is probing NewsGuard and again this is going to be James Comer. He's going to be doing what Jim Jordan always does, preening for the cameras, virtue signaling for the cameras, a lot of storm and fury signifying nothing. It's just going to be a reality TV show. They have powers to do something

about this, but they won't do it. And this long article from Children's Self Defense goes to the fact that we all know that NewsGuard is operating as a puppet, as a surrogate for the government. And not only that we know which part of the government is doing it, we know that it's being done by the Department of Defense, by the State Department. Now this article doesn't talk about DARPA, but DARPA is heavily involved in this seat. It's

not just NewsGuard, but it's also Election Guard. Both of those were being run through Microsoft. Election Guard is sole grant to get started was ten million dollars that DARPA gave to Microsoft. Microsoft gave to Election Guard. It was DARPA that's running it. They're just using Microsoft as a beard. And I've said that since twenty eighteen. I said, you know, this is all coming from the government, and just to reinforce it, we got censored in

August sixth of twenty eighteen, took down all the social media. But then in October, just a couple of weeks before the election the midterm elections for Trump in twenty eighteen, just before that, they took down eight hundred sites, you know, things like Freethought Project and stuff on. The Freethought Project didn't support Trump. I had that the editor on We talked about it.

The common thread was not whether or not they liked Trump. It was the thing that got these people taken down was that they opposed the police state, They opposed the surveillance state, they suppose, they opposed the foreign wars that never end. That was what the common thread was. And so you can look at that and you can say, well, then I think I know we know who was funding Election Guard. I think we probably know who's doing

NewsGuard. And now since then people have done some research and they found that, yes, in fact, NewsGuard is being paid for by the Pentagon. You know, when all this stuff happened in twenty twenty, I said, it's medical martial law. And it's true. They used the medical health consumed height fears as Eric Peters calls them, they use them to enforce this stuff. But folks, it was martial law all this stuff. The first Germ

Game, it was a CIA, it was the Department of Defense. These are the people who are running it, along with Fauci's people and Johns Hopkins and stuff like that. But it is. It's full on martial law. It's coming from the Pentagon. It always was planned, rehearsed by the Pentagon. They were the ones rolling it. They weren't just there to deliver the jabs. The whole thing was a military operation, operational warp speed. So

again, a NewsGuard is a beard for all this. And they claim that they're going through and looking at different journalists organizations and giving them what they call nutrition labels. And they sell those nutrition labels to advertisers to say, well it's not safe to advertise on the David Knight Show. Right, That's it

works out that way. Uh. And so in a letter to NewsGuard UH, the CEO Stephen Brill and Gordon Krovitz, Congressman Comber, who's going to be running this dog and Pony show, highlighted federal funding that NewsGuard receives and possible actions being taken to suppress accurate information. Well, we know that the NewsGuard knows that, you know that Comber do something for once, Well, any of these Republicans do something? Will they pass a law to stop this

covert collusion? You know that this money has They've now uncovered these contracts. They know the money was paid to NewsGuard, and so we're so pass a law and just say that if this is an organization that has been operating, you know, on behalf of the Pentagon, to label people as false,

which is essentially censorship by proxy. So if you're going to use your organization censorship by proxy, you take those millions or billions of dollars whatever it is, and you return it to the government along with a penalty, and you shut that down. You could do that. It could also pass a law saying that you're not going to be allowed to covertly use a private company to and it's they're not even they're not even very good at hiding it. They

don't even care. They just have to have a little bit of plausible deniability, and everybody gives them a pass. People like Comer gives them a pass. In twenty twenty one, for example, we now know the Department of Defense awarded a contract to NewsGuard seven hundred and forty nine thousand dollars contract for the Misinformation Fingerprints database. And so what they're going to do is take narratives that they didn't like, narratives about the phony pandemic and all the rest of

stuff, or other or about the bioweapon vaccine. You put them into anybody that says something about that, we're going to look for those search terms, and we've got the database here. We find somebody like that, we're going to shut them down and label these people. I really do think that this is probably at the at the base of what has happened to me with this show. I was shut down in May of twenty twenty one by PayPal, by Venmo, these other people like that. You know, YouTube continually shuts

me down always as soon as I get on there. So when we look at what is happening was ultimately coming from the Pentagon Martial Law, it really is fascism, folks. It is a public private partnership. You know, you got the Pentagon paying money to these company. The NewsGuard is making a profit selling this stuff to advertisers, but it's a merger between them, and

it is covert censorship. That's not even a secret. So they worked with the Global Engagement Center to brand numerous accounts that posted quote legitimate and accurate COVID nineteen updates. They labeled them as Russia linked. It's intended to covertly suppressed speech, said a lawsuit from the New Civil Liberties Alliance. Those are the

people that helped with a bump stock case. Michael Cargill, the New Civil Liberties Alliance should contact them see if they can find out something about this PayPal thing. Like to nail those people to the wall anyway. One journalist, Paul Thacker, said these groups add nothing to the public discourse except shutting down journalism and silencing people from voicing an opinion. Society doesn't need hall monitors telling

us where we can and cannot go. Jeffrey Tucker at Brownstone Institute said these groups are there to censor us, to discredit us. Basically, that's their power, and that's supposed to make me afraid, he said, but it doesn't. He told the defender that this is children's health defense. He told them that his interactions with NewsGuard and of course Guard Goldsmith has had interactions with NewsGuard, and he's got a comment here about the Supreme Court, I see.

But you know he's talked to me, he's mentioned it publicly as well, how much time he spends trying to satisfy NewsGuard. And he knows, just like Jeffrey Tucker knows, that they're not sincere in their concerns. But you go through the paperwork and hopefully you know it'll they if you push back. But you've got to spend a lot of time to keep them from shutting you down, Tucker said. Jeffrey Tucker said, NewsGuard has been a constant

and censorious annoyance from the very beginning of our operations. They set up Brownstone, He said, at first, I attempted to engage earnestly. I spent hours on the phone with their reporters and researchers, and I attempted to answer every inquiry. I did this because Brownstone strongly believes in accuracy and truth whatever it is, so of course I believe that we would pass whatever tests they

offered up. Over time, it became clear that they already had their agenda and their conclusion, and there never really was a point to wasting an instant of time with this organization. They appear to be objective organizations, but then it turns out they've got their own source of funding, the government, the Pentagon, and they've got strong biases, and their purpose is censorship. That's their goal, surreptitious censorship. I said. For the longest time, all

this stuff is happening. Oh well, you know, these are just corporations, and we have organizations like Reason and Cato Institute and the Heritage Foundation, the biggest ever to think thing. They say, well, this is a private company and they can do whatever they want. I remember John Stossel saying, well, I really don't like what they're doing and they're abandoning me everywhere. But you know, hey, they're a private corporation. That's my principle.

Like, private corporation can do whatever they want. So didn't you realize they're doing this for the government. Don't you realize that they've got this velvet glove of this is a private organization and we should be able to do what w that's their velvet glove, and inside of it is the iron fist of government. You know, this is a big brother thing. You can't see that. It's absolutely amazing. And they said that up until the point of the Twitter files were released, and it's like, wow, who knew?

Who knew about that? Yeah, Michelle Obama is their unrealized gain regarding gold Well. No, at this point in time, what they are stocks Biden and Elizabeth Warren would like to do that sort of thing. Now they're going to tell you that's only for people who got to know worth of one hundred million dollars or more. So if they were to get that through, and

it's still not certain whether or not they would get through. There's four people in this decision that made it clear they would not support a tax, an outright tax on wealth. But then they need to get either Kavanaugh or Roberts on their side to have a five to four decision. So the so that remains to be seen whether or not they would approve a wealth tax. When the wealth tax comes in, the wealth tax will be if it comes in, it'll be done. With the income tax. The income tax was only

a tax on income. Wages were not income. Wages did not become income until they said it was until the IRS made it income during World War two. They had a temporary wage tax during World War two, but it was supposed to end after World War two. That's why for years you would get the IRS tax forms that they would mail out to you, and on it be a message from the IRS Commissioner, thank you for participating in this voluntary income tax. Well, yeah, that was the cynical way, just like

they call it civil asset forfeiture. It's not you know, they use the civil system because they're not passing a law. It's not forfeiture, it's theft. You know. They use these types of for varications and labels to get what they want. But they just kept enforcing it. Bottom line is is that it will you know, once they do it, if they if it passes the Supreme Court, some kind of a wealth test, they will only

do it for people who have one hundred million dollars or more wealth. They will then start bringing that down pretty rapidly, but it'll be a period of time before they do that. But if it is gold, do they know you got it? They might do that with bitcoin, but I don't know about gold. Do they know that you've got the Bitcoin is not anonymous, you know, But once you get the gold, I must have fallen in the out of the fishing boat with my bump stock or something. I don't

know, Jason Barker. Do I get credit for unrealized losses? No? No, won't work that way. Of course. The plan is that if you win, they win. If you lose, you lose. That's right, he says. I've talked about this, and if they tax unrealized gains, then there's no reason to invest and the stock roller coaster will die overnight. Well, that wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing. That stock roller Coaster has given unlimited amounts of capital to these big corporations so they can operate as

if they were getting money from the Federal Reserve. I mean, it's the same type of thing. There's no you just have to find a greater fool and so it allows these companies. I know that because we operated for about fifteen years against Blockbuster Video, and then even after we sold and got out of the business, they went on for like another kind of fifteen years and

they never made any money. You know, they're making a lot of money when Wayne Heizinger bought it, but when the studio bought it, when you had some Redstone with a viacom that owns Paramount and all, and when they bought Blockbuster, they never made a dime. They lost money every single time. But they were getting funded by the stock market even though the marketplace was

not giving them money. The stock marketplace was so guard Goldsmith. The Scots decision on the more case, the taxing unrealized gains is the poison Cherry on the poison tax Sunday. Yeah. So, by the way, did you see how Blackrock has bought the debt of Ukraine a large portion, and the US now will use the interest on frozen Russian assets to give Ukraine loans, all of it to benefit Blackrock. I saw that. I didn't see the Blackrock connection, but I did see that. They said, oh, yeah,

we will, you know, give the interest on this stuff. Actually that was all that Europe wanted to sign up for, and it was about three billion a year. And then Biden said, no, we want to, you know, hit the principle as well. So they came up with a compromise of a fifty billion dollars which was taking some of the principal as well as, you know, some of this interest of it. It's all corrupted. Ukraine is just a money laundering operation for people like the Bidens,

that's all it is. But of course it also their ticket into World War three. Princess wrong thing says Trump said he won't tax tic tips. That means will probably get the carbon tax. Yeah, I'll do it somewhere. Yeah, Marigan, I missed the tree huggers. These new age environmentalists aren't very intelligent. Yeah, and they are a lot more destructive. I don't know if you were, if you were a lumberjack out there and you hit one of these things that they put inside the tree, that could be very

dangerous to bright fingers. These folks future Weather underground folks, or are they too soft for that? I think the too sow for it. But of course the Weather Underground really wasn't all that intelligent either. You know, they blew themselves up and had a lot of mistakes with it. But Bernardine Dorn and what's his name, they got out of it. You know, he had he had protection from above, and then he started getting into education got

really dangerous. The Stone Hinge protesters are pissing into the wind. It's tim O too. Yeah, you're right, Syrian girl. If we don't bring God into this fight, we have no chance for success. There are many people pointing out the corruption, but no one has any ideas of how to end it. Yeah, it's like Chesterton said, what is wrong with the world? I am Yeah. Unless we recover that, unless we look at the loss of the moral found, we don't have a chance of doing anything

with this. Everybody's just going to be operating in their own perceived self interest, just like Trump. We'll have a government full of Trump people or people just like him. Jason Barker brainship cell phone is a disaster waiting to happen. I foresee many drunk dials to ex girlfriends. Absolutely right. Well, we're going to take a quick break and when we come back, we're going to talk about a new ministry that has been set up just to change the

behavior of men. Oh that interesting. Finally the mask comes off of that aspect of it as well. We'll be right back making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, I want to talk about what is happening with the ministry of changing men's behavior. Doesn't it sound like something from money Python. I'm sorry, this is the Department of Arguments. If you want to change men's behavior, you've got to go down doors to

the left. This is where these people are. They have become something of a parody. Nevertheless, before we get into it, I just want to thank Adam who left a tip on subscribe Star. I thank you very much. I appreciate that you wrote. Heard the money meter is running hurting this month. I've listened to you since twenty sixteen followed you over from Info Warris and could sense all that you since before the firing. I no longer listen

to them. I've heard from my friends it says outlandishes ever, keep up the good fight. My wife and my prayers are with you. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. And folks, we really could use the support this month. Things are really slow, so I know it's a difficult time for everybody. If you've got you know, brother, can you spare a coffee cup? You know, that's one of the one of the fundraising things is buy me a coffee. We don't do that, but we do

have some other ones. And if you want to know how you can support us and where you can find the show, go to the David Knightshow dot com. You can see where you can find the show live, where you can find the video archives, and we usually pull out a couple of clips each day as well as the full show that's there. And then we also have the podcasts, and we have links to a lot of those different podcasts. It can be very hard to find the podcast. They make it hard

to find. By the way, if you would like the show, wherever you see it, especially if it's on a podcast, that would help us a great deal. So you know, hopefully unless unless they've done a number on us that would help people to find us. But we never know. Maybe they have done a number on it. But if you would like the podcast, that helps a great deal and that doesn't cost anything. But if you'd like to support us, there's links there as to where and how you

can support us as well. Let's talk So we've got b slices now monthly supporter on Rumble. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. Let's talk a little bit about this ministry to change of changing men's behavior. This is coming out of Australia, but folks, this is global. And there is the Zerohage article. Whoever wrote it really nailed the essence of what all this

stuff is about. They point out that if you want to develop a toulitary and global government, you've got to come against the groups that are going to oppose you. Well, who's that likely going to be. Well, you've got to attack and cripple the largest subset of the population that is going to be most likely to give you problems in the future. If you're a tyrant, Which monolithic group is more likely to fight back against the system? Well,

obviously the answer is masculine men. And so if the government makes masculine men the problem, and they say that they're doing it in order to protect women, oh, they are advocates for women, Well, now their tyranny is clothed and compassion, isn't it. In recent years, Australia has been at the forefront of many authoritarian experiments. We saw this through the amazingly insane attacks that were the way they attack people who weren't wearing masks or meeting in

public and that sort of thing. Some of the worst that I've seen came out of Australia. That's why it's not surprising at all that the premiere of the Australian state of Victoria has created a new ministry tasked for the purpose of changing and perhaps even controlling men. The it's called the Parliamentary Secretary of the Office. Is the Parliamentary Secretary for Men's Behavior Change, that's what they actually call it. And this Orwellian is this amazing. Look at the picture of

this guy. Scroll that down a little bit there. Look at him now. If you want to get somebody who's going to shut down masculinity. Wouldn't you pick this guy? He is a very poster child for a non masculine man, isn't he. The appointment was in response to the Prime Minister Anthony albany Is also allegedly a man calling for gender based violence, the calling gender base, not calling for it, but calling it a national crisis and promising

greater government action. He said, well, first Australia banned guns for violent crime. Now they're just blaming men in general. Mainstream media claims a new effort is in response to a crisis of sexist violence against women. The problem is they don't have any data that shows this. Hospital records for assaults and homicides in Australia show a steady decline among men and women in the past two decades. They also show that men are much more likely to face victimization compared

to women. Oh, so you've got these girly men. You've got enough girly men like Tim Richardson the MP that's going to be the secretary for men's behavior change. So I guess you know they're getting beat up by women all the time. He's got a woman there standing by his side, that's his master, I guess. But anyway, the number of violent client crimes have

gone down, and there's been more against men than against women. Tim Richardson, this guy that they've picked, suggested that his role will focus primarily on the Internet. Who would have imagined that, right, This whole thing is set up as propaganda and censorship to control speech on the web in order to prevent toxic male behavior. Again, as they point out, all Western nations have been doing this. It's almost like it's some kind of a conspiracy,

isn't it. They'll do the same thing at exactly the same time. That's why I say, even though this is happening in Australia, you can expect this from a government near you at some point in time. The use of feminism is necessary to fabricate a rationale. They can't merely attack men for being men. They can't attack men for being potentially rebellious. So they have to have a victim out there that they can say they're protecting. We are an

advocate for filling the blank, right, That's why it always works. Yeah, in the early days of shutting down infrastructure, well, we're advocating for the snail darter. Right, I didn't know men could violently assault women over the internet, says my son. Yeah, speech is violence, didn't you know that? That's what they keep telling everybody's speech is violence. That's what they claim. So the tutalitarians become the good guys. They become the advocates

to protect women. The establishment's obsession with the cult of transsexualism, it's proof that their insistence that women are nothing more than a social construct and it can be replaced by mentally ill men and wigs and makeup. It leaves little doubt that femininity is being targeted nearly as much as masculinity. Yeah, that's right, it definitely is. Well, the uh, when we look at how this is rolling out in one tribe in the Amazon, is the Internet the

problem? Well, yes it is, but in a different way than they're telling people. Here's a remote tribe in the Amazon and they got connected to the Internet via starlink. Okay, they're going to run out expensive cable or fiber optics to them, but now with starlink, they can get the Internet to people who have never had it before. So they donate some equipment and get these people connected to the Internet and what did they find. Well,

they found that it is tearing apart the social fabric of that society. Now everybody just wants to sit around and play with social media and watch porn. That's what's happened. Even to a society where they used to be self sufficient. You bring in the Internet and now they're hooked on social media and porn. I think the Amish got it right, you know, I just keep coming back to the Amish. They had a tremendous amount of discernment to understand

where you got to cut the cord. Here, a reclusive tribe in the Amazon finally got hook to the Internet thanks to Elon Musk, only to be torn apart by social media and pornography addiction, complained the elders. Brazil's two thousand member Marubo tribe has been left bitterly divided by the arrival of Starlink nine months ago. When it arrived, everybody was happy, he said a seventy three year old to The New York Times. But now things have gotten worse.

Young people have gotten lazy because of the Internet, and they're learning the ways of the white people. The Marubo are a chaste tribe who even frown upon kissing in public. You know, that was kind of like my tribe of christiansen I was growing up. Alfredo has said many young Marubo men have been sharing porn videos in group chats, and he's already observed more aggressive sexual behavior in some of them. Yeah, that was always the argument with Hollywood.

You know, well, we're just reflecting society. No, you are directing society. Everyone is connected. That everyone is so connected that sometimes they don't even talk to their own family. I'll just wait until they give them some cell phones. Then they definitely won't be talking to their family in the village. If you don't hunt, fish and plant, you don't eat. Now, some young people maintain our traditions, said a fortiesh year old man.

Others just want to spend the whole afternoon on their phones. And that's what is happening everywhere here in Tennessee. We got Internet, unfortunately, and

so now what we have is the next step that the tribe in the Amazon have not reached yet. Furries. Furries in Tennessee. They will have a float in the Nashville Pride Parade. We are so proud to be doing the again. If you guys remember from last year we made international news and we were seen by Jill Biden. Isn't that great. It's a group called Murphrey's

Furs. I guess they're out of Murphrees Burrow. Well, now every furry group in Tennessee is joining us. We are sponsoring and paying for everyone to get involved with it. Wait paying, Who's who's picking up the tab? Are these You think these furries are independently wealthy or they got a sugar daddy like Soros somewhere pushing this kind of subversion. That's what it is. It's subversion. We can't wait to see the fandom united under a beautiful cause.

What is the cause? I guess the question is what causes this kind of mental disturbance. It's the Internet, It's things like that, and it is it is pushing them towards living in a virtual reality, doing to spend all the time. Ready player one, you know Spielberg the movie from the book.

You know they're living a little ten shed and they've got some kind of a VR thing that they can walk on in any direction, unless treadmill type of thing and a VR headset, and that's their life, that's their existence. Just like what's happening to these people on this Amazon tribe. They're catching on to that real fast, aren't they. Well, they used to hunt and fish and grow food. They had families, they talk to each other. Now they just hang out on their phones and look at pornography or engage

in social media. Approximately one third of these furries identify as exclusively heterosexual. Furries are about five times more likely to identify as exclusively homosexual than the general population, said their sites said. The site about the it's called first science dot com. But according to murphres furs, they don't agree with that said, No, it's not It's not two thirds homosexual, they said. They bragged that they're ninety percent homosexual, or at least I'll say not heterosexual.

So I don't know which of these alphabets they categorize themselves into. Some conservative commentators have positive that soon bestiality could be normalized along with the rest of the LGBT groups. I see it headed towards the VR thing. That's where I see it headed anyway. In Australia, parents are outraged and pulled their children

out of school in April after bestiality was taught alongside lgbt curriculum. Students say they were then given an explanation of the initials that are part of LGBTQIA plus, with each word and its meaning displayed on the screen, and then there was a slide for what plus means, and they just started randomly saying words

that no one knew what they were, Like bestiality. Well, the student said that was then explained to more detail, and the presenter seemed to imply that it was something that's practiced by people who identified as lgbt q I A plus. They don't have the multiple spirits being possessed with people. That's one of my favorite with the two spirit people. Are there only two spirits in there or is it legion? I don't know. Have you done a head

count of who's living in there with you? C N provides parenting advice what to do if your four year old comes out as a trance. We know what I would do. I would find out what adult is sexually grooming them and report them to the government. That the government doesn't do anything about it, I'd do something about it. You better find out you've got a four year old that's doing that, Just like I played the thing the other days. Here's ten thousand dollars and here's an oreo. Which one do you want?

I don't want the oreo. You know that's where these kids are. This is abuse. Why is this okay? Why is it okay during Pride month for men to go down the street naked? Right, We've had that report multiple times, multiple jurisdictions. Yes, there's a man who's walking down the street naked. Oh yeah, where are you? Oh well, that's the Pride parade. That's okay. Really really the fragmenting rainbow. This is from Moral magazine and they point out something that I pointed out many years ago.

I mean, you certainly can see it. With the author JK. Rowling of the Harry Potter stuff, boy, she has become persona nongradra in the UK. They can't even get an actor, an actress who will play her on a stage production about her life. Nobody wants to have anything to do with her. That's like the kiss of death because you've got to bow to the trainees if you want to be an acting and so you know, nobody wants to go anyw near that. And I said, for the longest

time, I said, you look at this. This is a competition between women and between the trannies, and they really don't like each other. I said, do you look at LGBT. There is a civil war that's developing between the l's and the t's. Well, this World magazine says, at the heart of the Pride's public relations problem is the inclusion of transgenderism as part of the rainbow, and these people are fighting each other. The t's are

going to be an increasing embarrassment to the LGBs because they're clearly insane. But it also tells us something about this whole movement. If you remember years ago when it's all began, we were told there was a gay gene. They emphasized the fact that this was biological, and because it was biological, we had to do this and that Now the teas are coming out and saying there is no such thing as biology, there is no such thing as objectivity.

It's all just in our mind. And so that's a big problem for the LGBs. That is the narrative. So what are you going to do? I mean about the furries? Do they are we going to add another letter to this? Are they going to add the F in there? For the furries, Well, what do we do as Christians, because that's what World magazine is doing. As a matter of fact, this is Carl Truman who

is writing. He says these things. This is touching on matters that are not merely about behavior, but it's touching on the issues as to what it means to be human. You know, just as we talk about this tribe in the Amazon, they get the Internet and all of a sudden, they don't hunt, they don't fish, they don't do anything except look at their phone all day, look at porn all day. This is about being human, and it's also how do we approach people said, we need churches.

Those whose lives and often their bodies have been shattered by the lies of the sexual and gender revolutions can seek shelter, support and find the offer of God's grace. That requires a community that is marked by cheerful hospitality. Yeah, we want to be cheerful. We want to be hospitable. We want to show God's grace. That doesn't mean that we gloss over what sin is. We don't change God's standard. We say, well, whether or not you like it or I like it, that's God's standard. But God also has

another standard, and that is grace for those who follow him. Now, it's not just merely paying lip service to it. God's not stupid. Why do you call me Lord and you don't do what I say? So you know there is that. But we don't want to have a situation where we are pushing people away. We want to embrace them, but tell them that God is not going to be pleased if they remain as they are. That type of thing. But you know, hey, this is a free gift

of grace. You want to get free of this bondage that you have to this the slavery that you have, whether it's alcohol, or whether it's drugs, or whether it's your sexual addictions. You want to get free of that. Well, there's a way to do it, but you got to follow Christ. It isn't an easy believism, but if you really are a follower of Christ, you can get free of that stuff. One last thing here, BMW and many other corporations during Pride Month are making rainbow colored versions of

their logos except in some Middle Eastern countries. And when they were called out on that, they asked them about this and why they're not doing it. Well, the statement from BMW was very telling. What they said was that it was a long statement, but the very end of it, the final paragraph said, this is an established practice at the BMW Group, which also takes into consideration market specific legal regulations and country specific cultural aspects. So we

need to understand this is not a cultural war. Culture is downstream from God and our relationship with God. The problem is is that here in America and in the West in general, the Christians that remain, many of them, do not take this discipleship thing seriously. They don't take God seriously. You know, the Muslims are taking it very seriously. They're taking it seriously enough that they will shut down BMW if BMW does this kind of thing in their

society. But we don't do that here. And I'm not saying that that's necessarily the right approach. I don't want the government deciding which companies can exist. But we don't even boycott their products generally. Hey saw that happen with bud Light. But generally we don't boycott their products. They just continue to do it. We should be on the offense. The gates of Hell will

not stand against us. If we truly are well, we're going to take a quick break here and we're going to connect with our guest, Jack Lawson. Before we do, I want to thank Ohen sixty one, thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that that's generous. And Joe Nationalists thank you as well. It writes in Idaho, property taxes are calculated using comparative house sale prices. Since I built my house, it has increased in value two hundred percent. This is also a tax on unrealized gains. Yeah,

you're right. Yeah, And where does most of the money for the property taxes get eaten up? In the school systems, school systems that have turned on our children and attack our children. You need to start pushing we all need to start pushing homeschooling. We can get enough people who are homeschooling. People are going to say, and why am I paying for these schools that I don't even want to send my kids to? And we can stop

some of that waste that is there in these schools. They're spending close to thirty thousand dollars a pupil in the big cities where they're getting the lowest test scores. So we're going to take away before you go, do not obey climatard a person who believes the climate can be changed by paying a CO two tax to the government. I love that definition. I've not seen that before.

We're going to take a quick break and when we come back, we're going to be talking to Jack Lawson and he's got some interesting things to talk about. We're going to talk about a Thermobarrick bomb explosion, he said, I am one of the few humans who have witnessed one of these. We're going to talk that, we're going to talk about tactical nukes, world War

three, how to prepare for this. I'm even going to hit Jack with some comments from the people in Great Britain have now started looking at prepping. Maybe the thing that woke them up was the idea that they're going to restart the draft. It's starting to feel a bit drafty around here as we're heading into World War three, not just in the United States, but it's also in the UK and many other European countries. People are starting to catch wind

of the fact that they want to put us into World War three. And so there was an interesting, interesting article about prepping for UK and they only have about fifteen percent of the people there who prep and I think they need to get Jack's book. They really didn't have a clue what to do. So we're going to take a look at that and talk about some misconceptions of that as well. So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back with Jack Lost. Stay with us, Liberty, it's your

move, and now the David Knight Show. All right. Joining us now is Jack Lawson, who has Civil Defensemanual dot com. Let me grab a copy of this. I'll always keep it right here, two volume set and you can find it at Civil Defensemanual dot com. There's a reason that Jack does this only in a physical copy. That's that's what we were just talking about earlier. You know, the hacks and the vulnerability of our infrastructure,

our internet and things like that. But Jack has something very interesting to talk about, and so I'm going to let you roll this story out. You know somebody that actually arrested Vladimir Putin and interrogated him, tell us about that. Yeah, David, I wrote written and published four books. Let me give you real quick your readers or your watchers, your listeners, an idea of my background. I was in the American Air Force, for four years.

I was an electronic specialist for missile guidance systems and a pro system they called the safe ol SAFO nuclear arming system, and I did the arming package for the nuclear bomb, which I used to actually sit on top of putting his package. I was also a member like Slim Pickens and in Doctor Schraine Law. Yeah, of course I never opened the door underneath you fortunately clim swim pickings, but probably didn't go into dark lack line. I got,

I got, I radiated from it. I've got problems from it. But I was also UH after the American Air Force. I was a member of a foreign Legian Anti Terrorists Rapid Response Unit UH in Africa, and I was involved in a nasty war. Was there for about three years, and I've I've offered four books. But what you were alluding to was Colonel Sully Defontaine. He's in the Special Forces U. I'm he was a member of my Special Forces chapter in Las Vegas. But the bottom line is the guy is

in the Special Forces Hall of Fame. I told him one time, Sally, when I see these pictures from the nineteen sixties of all these diplomats and stuff, I looked real close to see if you're in the background. He seemed to get involved in just about everything, but in this case he was a Green Beret colonel, right, he's a Green break colonel. And then he became the director of the Berlin Criminal Investigation Division, which is a department of the army. And he told me the story one day. What a

character, a great man. He was like a second father to me. I used to a sleep over to their house and his wife would make me breakfast, and they were just great people, you know, and just very salt of the earth. He was a Frenchman born in Brussels, but naturalized American because he spoke fluent Marseille French. He had a lot of interactions with the ABC agent. But in Berlin in the late eighties they had American tenth

Special Forces Group actually had people going behind the line. People don't know this unless you read books on this, but they had guys that lived in the Eastern Bloc countries. Just as if they owned a home and they were a citizen, they spoke perfect dialect of the language there. Well, one of these guys was out of the East Block and in Berlin in his apartment and

noticed a mailman walking down the street. And this mailman was in a German mail uniform and had a mail bag, and it was kind of curious. The guy was just nonchalantly stirring, and he noticed this guy isn't delivering any mail, and he saw him the next day, so he decides to follow this guy and he follows him to an apartment. The guy didn't deliver one bit of mail except he got to this apartment. So this special forces guy talked to the CID which Sullydfontein was running. He was a Colonel Inn and

told him about this. And so they put the mailman delivering the mail and the apartment under surveillance determine it was a Russian KGB operation. So they arrested the mailman. He turned out to be Vladimir Putin, now the president of our Premier of Russia, and he said he had a whole team of guys and they interrogated him NonStop for hours, and he said everybody came out of that room liking Putin. He was such a charming person. He first off

admitted, yeah, I'm a spy, you know. So anyway, he said, he said, I talked him for probably an hour and he said, he was an absolutely most charming person I've ever integrated, interviewed, and he said they swapped him a couple of days later for an American Special Forces guy they'd caught. Holy, So they did the swap and then the intelligence agencies found out about this and blew a fuse because yeah, Putin was the spy, but he was also running the entire Russian KGB operation in the East

Germany and they were really angry about this that they let him go. And apparently somebody didn't get the communicy. Hey, we captured this guy, so you know, since they showed no interest, they did the swap. Wow, it's amazing that if he's running it, that he would be out there on the street dressed as a mailman. This is almost like the Star Trek thing where they had the captain of the ship goes down with every party.

You know, he Putin majored in German language. They have intense schools in Russia back in that time, and he spoke perfect German, and so did Colonel d Fontaine. Anyway, the longest short of this thing was I said this, I asked Sally. I said, well, what was Putin like? He said, I'll just tell you one thing. He's nobody's fool. He tricked us into letting him go. He was so low key and he

had everybody in the room laughing. He's telling these jokes all the time, and you know, he looks so serious when you see him on TV. I mean, he's probably a pretty brutal character. He was KGB all those guys. And I'm no apologists for him or the Russians. Yeah, I think they made great They made mob, great mob characters. You know, it reminds me of the movie The Ukrainians do too, but yeah, it reminds me of the movie The Usual Suspects, where we had Kevin Spacey is

kaiser. He's telling them all this, yeah, that type of thing. That's That's exactly what Sully said. And he said, I'll tell you one thing. He said, he's no one's fool. He said, that guy is extremely intelligent and very crafty and very he can lay out a he can play three dimensional chess. Yeah. So, anyway, the longest short of thing was I thought that was very interesting that he interrogated him for this long time and that he was actually in Berlin doing this. But what he was

doing there, and why was there? I don't know. I didn't get the Sully was hard to get information out of He did so many incredible things, but his wife and me used to have to try to get him drunk on wine at night to get any stories out of him, because he was he was just so humble. He's just an incredibly great guy. Well, you know, it makes you, It makes you think when you compare how somebody rises up through a totalitarian system like that. Uh, and they do

have to be very ruthless, intelligent and so forth. And you know, whereas the people who rise up in our system, they have to be ruthless, they have to be ruthless and corrupt. They don't necessarily have to be intelligent. I guess see what's happening that is That is an understatement. I just have a hard time sometimes getting up in the morning and skimming over the news. I don't really get into it too much in detail. Yeah,

because it's a matter. I think the biggest task people face in this country now is trying to determine what the truth is. Yes, And that's why I actually encourage your readers to to support you, because to me, you're you're one of the few people that's a voice of reason and reality in this crazy world. I mean, well, it's time to think you the news. I I just I can't even look at it. It's just it's disheartening, and I think it's purposely designed to be that way. But anyway,

I cannot believe the mess were in use. The understatement was not very intelligent, but they seem to be surrounded by people like that. Joe. You know, we're in a Kennedy Kennedy missile crisis. Whether people realize this or not, Yes, Cuban Kennedy missile crisis. Only Joe Biden isn't John Kennedy, and Putin is not Nikita Khrushchev's. Krushev was kind of a clown and he got very much. Yeah, you know when he when he goes to the unit and he takes off his shoe and he starts banging on the I

think we will bury you. I mean that, yeah, theatrics. He was one of the Stalin used to make them dance around and when they had their commissar meetings and got drunk and and he was kind of looked at as the clown, but everybody liked him and he was acceptable enough to put in a position at that time. But we don't have those people. So I think people better pray that cooler heads prevail in this thing. I am totally

convinced these people in the West have lost their grip on reality. They're totally delusional. We do not have a nineteen ninety military anymore. We do not have even technological superiority anymore. The one thing that's going to be the deal breaker in a war is going to be the hypersonic missiles. Now, missiles I worked on were pretty fast, but nothing, nothing at all like what they've got. Now, it's going as somebody who's going to get walked over,

and I don't believe it's going to be the Russians. They've had two years of intense combat experience. Most of the men they've rotated through to get combat. So they've got approximately one point two million people that are combat ground forces. And you know, I don't know who's going to be in involved

with this. I think initially NATO, if they get boots on the ground into Ukraine, is probably going to be using European troops now that they're already and they've had American troops in there, These systems that we're giving them are so complex. You can't teach somebody how to run that thing like a Himyer's missile system. You can't teach this stuff in a month or two months.

And because of that, they've had to put people in there. And I think our Defense Department is concealing the fact that quite a number of Americans have probably been killed over there. Yeah. You know, well, of course, with our white and borders, you've talked about many times, the ability for them to do direct sabotage, not just through cybersecurity issues and things like

that. We could easily have somebody dressed as a mailman just walk across the border, right, he doesn't even have to have a mail bag, just come across. I might actually stick out and be even more suspicious if they came dressed as a mailman, I think, Yeah, you'll probably get the choice of of postal office blue water or one of the LGB colored ones. He there you go, Yeah, yeah, I come dressed as LGBT. Oh, bring them right in. We need more of them. Yeah.

I've never seen a country in such a best. Yeah, we'll just tell your listeners this. And you had a conversation since writing his book, The Civil Defense Manual. I have had the opportunity to meet people that I would have never met in my lifetime. One such person I won't say his name. He's up in his eighties now. He was in line for the last president's assistant Director of National Security, which he turned down because he was eighty

at the time. He's a retired Army colonel and combat veteran of Korea and also an attorney, and he was He's had some very important positions. But he told me about two weeks ago. All the chatter in Washington, DC, in the Pentagon, the intelligence agencies, politicians is something is going to happen in September October, something very big. I don't want to alarm people,

but I also believe that something is going to happen. Whether it's going to be an all out war with American troops in the ground in the Middle East or in the I don't know whether it's going to be an exchange of some kind. By the way, I'll just tell you this, I'm quite familiar. I'm no expert, but I'm quite familiar with nuclear type weapons. The first one people have to understand. We set off and hure Shaman Knagonzaki

was an atomic bomb that was splitting the atom. The ones that they came up with after that were called thermonuclear, which is a combination of splitting atom, which is fission and fusion, which is a multiplication factor that makes us bomb exposion a thousand dimes more powerful. We now use thermonuclear weapons. There is no such thing as a tactical nuclear weapons. That is a joke. I laugh every time I hear it. It's like the old myth of mythology

of door's box. Once you open that look out, I don't think anybody understands the graduation and power of these bombs. And that's a frightening thing to me. Well, and of course, you know, we've had a lot of indications of this. You look at Jenn Stoltenberg, I think, is the NATO commander, head of NATO. He's stepping down, and they got a new guy they're putting in there, Mark Ruta, who was the guy that was Prime minister in the Netherlands trying to shut down all the farms and

the farmers. They organized and threw him out, so they move him to NATO. But you've got all these different European nations, but especially the UK, talking about reviving a draft and doing this even though that's unpopular, doing it as they're coming up to an election. And then the same thing here in the United States and the United States not only talking about automatically registering you to in the draft, but now you got a Democrat saying, let's draft

women. And this is one of the things that here's a meme that was used years ago. This was a guy that they convicted and want to send to prison because he put up some joke memes during the twenty sixteen election saying just text your vote to this or show up on Wednesday or whatever to vote. The same things were being done on the other side to Republicans, but they came after this guy, not after the person who was doing it on the other sanitary Republicans, and I want to put him in jail. One

of the memes that he put up is this. When I've got up on the screen right now, a woman who is laying on the ground said he died for his country's in the military Arlington Cemetery or something. He died for his country. Now it's her turn. And then down on the bottom there it's Hillary Clinton's logo and the hashtag draft our daughters. They're actually doing that

now, that's what they want. Well, of course the Republicans are saying, we're not going to do that, but you've got Democrats have introduced that bill. So when you look at the fact that not only are they a bringing up the draft, but they are also trying to extend it because they're worried that they're not going to have enough people, they're going to extend it

to women as well. And so all of these things are indications. And then you had the reason I mentioned NATO before was because the guys currently there said, oh, yeah, it's no problem for us to fly jets over Russia. Oh really, that's not a problem. That's not a provocation, that's not taking it to the next step. That's where they are right now.

So yeah, when you say that something's going to be happening if it's done right before the election, Yeah, maybe that's a part of their calculation to take us to war because people are not happy with what they're doing, but they keep pushing this. It's a relentless iterative process to push us into World War III. Yes, I believe there's a push. How far this

is going to go, I don't know. I'll just say this that it's quite interesting how all of these LBG x y Z people and people like Ruta who were trying to close all the farms down, how they are so behind all of this is it's if somebody can't connect the dots and draw a conclusion that there is an agenda behind this that's being pushed by people, then they need to go back to school. I think a probable situation. I feel this is quite probable. I earlier told you I'm one of probably a handful

of people that's ever witnessed a thermobaric explosion. Let me explain to people what a thermobaric is. It is not nuclear. It is simply something that Germans were working on at the end of World War two, one of the their secret weapons. And thank god they did not get the thing functioning and delivery systems because this weapon. I'll just give you an in I saw this thing dropped. I was probably eight hundred yards away from this day, and the

pilot told me over the radio. He said, he said, watch this, mate, and he disappeared as yet disappeared into the clouds and he came down almost probably a seventy degree angle, released this thermobaric bomb. Wow. A thermobaric bomb is a very low flash point, highly flammable mixture of chemicals, primarily fuels. And what happened when he dropped this bomb is usually the procedure in most of them. Now the Russians have made huge strides with thermobaric

weapons in the last decade. But the thermobaric bomb, once it's dropped, a small explosive charge blows the sides off of the thing like a clamshell, and it distributes. You can literally see this. I watched this miss of highly flammable fuel spread out for hundreds of yards. And then the bomb has a lanyard hanging on it, in other words, a long rope, and it's got a weight on it, and that weight, as soon as it touches the ground, releases the tension on the rope and it triggers the main

explosion, which then ignites all of this fuel missed. That's over hundreds of yards. Wow. I have never in my I've seen a lot of explosions, I've never in my life witnessed anything like this. There were actually two of them The first one was kind of a crump sounding and the shell sides came off. The thermobaric weapon spread the fuel and then the main charge ignited all that. It actually sucked the wind eight hundred yards away towards it.

It was drawing on the oxygen out and it needed it thuring to ignite. This explosion of the fuel, it drew all It created a mushroom cloud. I couldn't believe this, but the light from the explosion was so intense it was like a bright star. Now people talk about the Russians using retaliating if they get hit inside. I think right now what they're doing they have the

Ukrainians have a limited number of missiles. Most of them have a range probably maximum of three hundred miles, and they've got to be launched inside of Ukrainian controlled areas. I think they're limited in these, and I think the Russians are going to let them expend them. The replu of them is going to be a problem because they're completely They're over sophisticated like most American and native weapons are. Yeah, so I think what the Russians, if they do retaliate,

will probably widely announced. They're using a thermobaric weapon. These things have, they have. I've never seen a lot of them set off, but I saw the one and I can just tell you it almost mimics a small nuclear weapon explosion that I've seen in training films in the Air Force. So that's a possibility. Whether the West is going to say it is a nuclear weapon being used, I don't think the Russians want to open Pandora's box.

I don't know what's your take on it. Well, you know, when we go back and we look at what happened with Syria, for example, that was every time, and it was it was three years in a row that they did this right, and the last one they did was the first

year of Trump. It was in twenty seventeen. And every time you would have a city that had been under constant bombardment and the Syrian government was about to take back this Syrian city and we're supposed to believe that they dropped chemical weapons, and it was debunked every one of those times, and people, you know, eventually you get eyewitnesses that are there and other testimony, but it took a while, and you know, they would show even the spent

canisters and stuff like that, but it was it took a while for them to debunk that. It made no logical sense whatsoever that they would conduct this conventional warfare, get right up to the point of winning, and then do the one thing that would bring in troops on the ground. It was obviously a narrative to bring troops in on the ground. So it becomes an information war, just like it was with Syria, and you know, and they

nearly got what they wanted out of that each of those times. Even in Trump's first year he kind of followed up on it and sent some missiles in. But then you know, it was shown that it was the white hats who had claimed that it was a poison gas that was dropped on them and that type of thing, So you know, who knows it's really going to

be. That's why I think the key thing is information because when you have a war, the first thing that goes is the truth, and it's difficult for people to get through that fog of war and know which side is telling them truth. Typically both sides are lying about everything, and so it's very difficult to sort that out. And if they really want to push it hard, they'll just use as an excuse and go in because it takes a while to debunk these types of issues. So I think it's very plausible they might

do something like that. I also think it's very interesting you talked about how overcomplex our systems are. I think when you look at things like the one Abrams and all these other high tech, very expensive pieces of equipment that we're sending over there, Oh, that's going to be a game changer. There's no way that they can counter that, and yet they do. They're very

vulnerable. You see now the modern state of the art tanks that are being put in by Germany, and presumably they'll do it with the one Abrams. I haven't seen any of them with it on. Maybe they've got it on, but they're driving around. They look like a mobile chicken coop, you know. They put it's really crude, you know, netting and like a chicken coop and everything on top of the tank. It looks, it looks, it looks like a mess, but you know that's what they have to

do. They call the Russian one the Turtle, Yeah exactly, We've got the same thing. Yeah, but you know what has happened. I mean, you know, with every war, you begin it fighting the tools from the last one, and then you find out everything's really changed, and so the things changed. That is a drone strike, and that is really kind of turned into kind of a stalemate trench warfare. Troops can't move because the

drones will go after them directly, but also after the tanks. You know, when you're talking about the troops or the tanks, it's very easy to change it. So it's really hard to tell where this is going to start. I don't like any of this because once you start a war, everybody's got this attitude, oh yeah, we're going to win. This thing is going to be a cake walk and everything. You always hear that the beginning of wars, nobody knows which way it's going to go, and everything changes.

Yeah, people here have to understand if it progresses from any kind of a strike by the Russians in Europe to them going really overboard and striking something in the United States. When I went through nuclear training, it was like bend over and try to kiss your butt goodbye. It was under the MAD doctrine, which stands for mutual assured destruction. It was insanity, still is insanity. They're got enough weapons to turn this planet into blackened cinner revolving around

the Sun. I don't think anybody is that crazy. I don't know. I see things being done and you say information war. Good God. I mean, we've been told from day one, the Russians are being defeated. The Russians are being defeated. The Russians are pushing all over that place. Now they've learned from their mistakes. They did get have quite a few casualties to start with, because the Ukrainians are well I speak of the late Ukrainians,

the Ukrainian military. The Ukrainians are fighters, and they're pretty ferocious fighters, but they're no longer around five six hundred thousand of them killed. But if people get start to get scared over this, they have to realize it's

quite simple. I'd like to go into this a little bit, just the seven ten rule and the inverse square law when it comes to nuclear weapons and a detonation, So they're unless you're in a fireball or the blast area, you know, it's it's a matter of doing a couple of simple things and you can survive and you won't have any ill effects from it, depending on how far your away from the blast area, but generally speaking, people should

I've got a whole section in a Surviving nuclear war with what you have, and people go to www. Civil Defensemanual dot com. I've got an entire section in there. It's free to read, but it'll give people a pretty good idea. It doesn't have the seven to ten rule in but it's got basic information. Get in the middle of your house and let me let me say this. You know, it's important for people to you put that there. That's that's very important, and it's free for people. So you've also

got a chapter from your books about water and that is also free. And so if people look at those two things, you're going to see the depth and the breadth of information that Jack's got in these things. But it also two things that you really do need to know. Yeah. Yeah, it's basically the a disea of how to survive without this modern technical, power driven electrical infrastructure that we live in. And it's a matter of like walking through

a desert. If you're walking fifty miles through a desert and a water hole is twenty five miles away, you need to get to that water hole, and it's a matter of surviving long enough to continue on with your life. And I don't see strike. For one thing, people get confused. They think, oh, if we're getting bombarded. I don't know what the Chinese would do, but I know the doctrine of most militaries and nuclear exchange is a they're going to set off an EMP, a series of them electromagnetic PULSEV.

I'm not going to go into but it's too complex. But the second thing they'll do is hit military centers, communications and power generation hubs, military manufacturing and logistics centers. They're not out to kill everybody in the city of New York or Los Angeles. If there's a facility there that's manufacturing, it may get hit. If there's an Air Force base next door, may get

hit. If there's a like the EUMO Marine Corps depot or the TUELI which fuels all supplies for everything but the Marine Corps, those places may get hit. But the bottom line is they're not out to kill the citizenry. But you have to, you know, people have to evaluate what's around them, and that's going to give you pretty much a survival factor to tell you whether

you're going to be in a blast or a fireball area. And of course if they take out the infrastructure, and you know, people can't have most people haven't provided anything for themselves. They don't have to kill everybody. Everybody will wind up killing each other. Try fighting over that food. That's such a valid point, and everybody seems to forget that. If the electrical grids goes down, we're we're in big trouble. Our internet went off where I

live for two hours. We had a transformer ball. Of course, everybody's freaking out in the neighborhood. The Russians is attacked, you know, like that movie, remember that movie with Peter Rusinoff. The Russians are coming. Laugh at that movie. But you know they portray Russia as I'm no apologist for him. Like I say, there's some pretty brutal, brutal people and the gangs that they have, and that kind of shows me what they're like.

But I think the longest short of it is people think that Russia is the Soviet Union that we fought in the Cold War. It's no longer that It's totally changed, that's right. I don't think they have aspirations to take over Europe. I mean, I was thinking, why would they want to they got every Third world dreg in the world coming into Europe. I mean, they must have enough problems at home. The Russians, why would they

want to take on all these Third world migrants. You know, well, if you stop and think about it, they've got the largest land mass and they're right next to China, which has the largest population, and I think they're worried about their back door. I mean, they don't really need any more land. They've got more land than anybody else does right now. And you know, it's I think when you look at the Ukraine thing, I see it as NATO aggression going back eight years and this internal civil war that

was going and everybody Maiden evolution. Yeah, and it's ben't proven. Yeah, the intelligence agencies and the West were involved in that. Yes, yes, and even in Ukraine. We had one guy he's now been kicked out because he was very candid about everything. You know, he got kicked out when he said, yeah, that the Russians didn't target that apartment building. It was a missile cruise missile that came in and we hit it and then it veered into this apartment building. So they kicked him out, but he

was he was unfiltered in what he had to say. And he came in with the Zelenski regime, which campaigned on ending the war, and he said, no, there's not going to be any end of the war. And as a matter of fact, he said, in three years, we're going to be at war with Russia, and in three years they were. You know, it was twenty nineteen he said that. So there was this everybody understood on both sides where this thing was going for quite some Well, look,

we did the same thing. If the Russians are Chinese, moved missile systems that would deliver a nuclear weapon, ad nuclear weapons in New Mexico, I guarantee you the boy yeah border and get control pretty quick. In fact, we'd be probably running tanks over into Mexico. We would not put up with that. And you know, Colonel McGregor, my theory is proven by the Cuban metal crisis. We didn't put up with them. And so what Russia is doing I think is for the benefit of their security. Again,

I'm not an apologist for them. There's a lot of things I like about people all over the world. There's things I don't like, But I've had interactions so I've got a couple of guys that were Special forces guys in Afghanistan the Russian Army, I know, and they're great guys talk to, you

know, but pretty brutal characters too. Yeah. Yeah, well, you know, it's what Gregor said, if you think that, if you think that Ukraine can beat Russia, that's kind of like saying, if we had a war between Mexico and the United States and Mexico is going to win, that's just not going to happen. The size of the place, the resources, the imbalance that is there, and so you know, it's become a proxy war. But you mentioned at the very beginning, and you can refer

to it again now, the Cuban missile crisis. And you know what, people didn't realize for maybe about fifteen years or maybe longer. I think it came out in the eighties, maybe twenty years after it happened, that there was this other thing that was happening. We had put missiles in Turkey and that was going on Italy. We actually had one of the versions of the V two German rocket was the Jupiter missile, and they had nuclear tipped ones

in Turkey right across the border. Yeah, and of course a typical American politician, Kennedy says, we stared to Russians down they blink. Well, they didn't really blink. You know. That's one of the reasons Crucier got removed was the deally he made. And the long and short of the thing was they took those missiles and there's nuclear weapons out of Turkey and at the demand of the Russians, and they didn't really blink. They just did a

trade off, you know. Yeah, that's right, And that was that was kept quiet on our side for quite some time, and so you know, in a sense, this is very much a repeat of that. Of course, as you pointed out, Biden is no JFK and it's no Cruise chev But you know, we've put this military stuff close to them now with Ukraine. So they're making a show of bringing their sub to Cuba and to Venezuela to launch rockets from it as well as a show of force to say

this dangerous. Yeah, that's a dangerous, dangerous situation. Yeah, when you get to nuclear weapons, it's not far from a soldier having a rifle and being in a war and shooting the enemy and getting around people that are armed road disarmed, there's always the potential to pull trigger. That's right, because he's been doing it. If you let the nuclear box of Pandora's box open and take out the tax to the nuclear weapon and use them, look

out. Nobody knows how far this is going to go. And of course our people in Washington, DC and elsewhere that are important really have no skin in the game because they've got provisions to protect these people for a long period of time. Americans don't have it. The Russians just had a forty four thousand person about three months ago civil defense exercise. When's the last time you heard our our civil defense? It really isn't anything to speak of. It's

FEMA, Yeah, it's nothing. Does There's an interesting book I read. I've talked about that several times called Raven Rock, the US Government's plan to save themselves and let the rest of us die, talking about how he had what they had done during the Cold War, we had mutually assured destruction.

They were going to assure that all of us died, but we're going to go into the underground bunkers and things like that, and they got into a lot of detail about it, you know, talking about these these different places. We had one close to where we lived in North Carolina that was an underground AT and T facility, So there was a lot of these different things that were spread around. But yeah, you're right, they really don't care

about us. And when you started talking about this like giving a rifle to a soldier, the thing that came to my mind was, these guys in Washington are kind of like some guys never touched a gun before, and you hand it to him and he's waving it around at everybody in the room without any muzzle control, right, you know, And that's really what's going on

with our foreign policy. I mean, it's like we've handed a bunch of rifles to the State Department and the Pentagon and they're just waving on it everybody world, you know, to see where this is going to go off. Well, let's hope if anything catastrophic like this happens, that there's enough of us left to have the capability to run the cement trucks over and fill their

airbents. You know, I don't you know, I don't envision a world being run by the politicians period, but especially who we've got in charge now, and those people running the government now are not going to relinquish power. In my opinion, They've gotten where they've gotten as far as they've gone, and I do not think I think they're kind of like somebody haven't her house for closed on and deside the light of fire and burn the thing down is

walking out the door. I think that's this extent that these people will go. And I don't even think they know how dangerous this situation is. They just keep poking, as far as I'm concerned to poking. The Russian they keep the we have five or six times as many aircraft. We've got a lot of F fifteen's and sixteens and delivery systems for nuclear weapons. But if they put those in Poland, I'll guarantee you the Russians are not going to

wait. They will probably do something to take those airbases out. They will not let that threat because they're seeing these people as totally illogical and unreasonable and literally insane. Just directive and decisions they're making. You don't put yourself in the Russian military. I think Putin is probably fairly reserved, and what he's

done. I've heard that some of the military officers wanted US overthrow him over this other group that had the opinion, let's slowly kill off the Ukrainians and will take We don't want to provoke a war, you know, pull on. I just don't think they're going to be able to avoid it. Yeah, is it truly is insane? And you know, I think that you talked about the fact that the Russians have civil defense drills and things like that.

Nothing here. They went through. Their experience in World War Two is very different than the American experience, and because so many millions of them died in that war, that's the kind of memory that lasts. You know, we don't really remember World War Two in this country much. It wasn't on our soil, and the people who fought it now for the most part, have died, and so there's a bit of an understanding of maybe our fathers

or our grandfather's war. But it's very different when you have that kind of mass slaughter on your own soil that persists for several generations, and so they have very different perspective on this, I think, correct, correct, I think that the Russians are willing to sacrifice people the amazing to me, it totally blows me away. I like to study military tactics, and we have a conventional We have a set of conventional tactics to fight a Russian invasion of

Europe. The Russians have always, but they especially now with technology, use what's called the ISR. It's intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance. They pinpoint every square inch of twenty five miles in front of them, or drone artillery, missile strikes, anything that gets in that not twenty five miles, twenty five kilometers and it gets in that twenty five kilometer range. They have three layers of

defense. Every one of those layers is basically pinpoint targeted for heavy heavy bombarber. This is why the Ukrainians just get cut to pieces. They'll lose five six thousand people in a day because they say, okay, yeah, we broke through the Russian lines. No, they broke through the first tier of defenses, and the Russians don't let them get any further than that. They

decimate them. They decimate as one out of ten. They obliterate them, and our NATO advisors can't seem to teach them anything but what the conventional tactics of a Cold war war for an invasion of Russia. They it just boils me away. But this isn't where military stick in the mud, and junior commanders say only what they know the senior commander wants to hear. So it's just a misurrected effort. But they I I'm just assured that eventually, as

far as I'm concerned, the Ukraine has already crumbled. They just haven't closed up shop yet. They've still got the lights on. Yeah. Yeah, And a lot of people were saying that from the very beginning. It's like, you know, this mismatch that is there is doomed to failure, and yet it appears that the NATO forces are just going to use that as an excuse to directly engage the Russians. Yeah. I think that's where this is headed. Well, you know, there's an interesting article. Let's talk a

little bit about individual preparation again. You've got the chapter about how to prepare for nuclear war in the aftermath of that if you're not in the blast the direct blast zone, and that is a free chapter at Civil Devents Manual dot

com. But I was kind of curious to get some of your response to an article that saw that I thought was kind of funny because it was in the UK and they were saying that only about fifteen percent of the British people do any kind of prepping, and so the Telegraph got a hold of somebody and said, we'll tell us what we need to do. And of course the first thing that you talk about is, in fact, you've got to

have water. Nowhere in this do they mentioned water at all. Instead they say, well, you've got to have about three days worth of canned food and things like that. You gotta have a winter sleeping bag, a warm, waterproof coat. And I'm looking at this and it's like, what are they talking about? A flashlight? You know, stuff like this beach. Yeah, that's right. I like this one a three and one survival survival whistle, a whistle so that you we're going to call exactly what you're gonna

call, yeah, ghosts. Yeah. For one thing, I don't want to insult anybody English, but I'm married to an English woman and a British woman, and I've always said that the English make good subjects, not citizens. We Americans. I I really do believe that we almost have something in our genetics that gives us such a ferocious independence it's passed on since the days of the seventeen hundreds, since we set foot in this place. It's just

a survival mode. I would like to tell people. The simple rule is this, you better have some water number one, if you're going to survive. Okay, I'll give you a scenario I would do in my house if there was a nuclear attack and we had winds drifting this way with fallout Number one. The nuclear weapons that I worked on, the thermonuclear weapons, were what were called the dirty bombs. They were very inefficient. They were a

huge blast, they left a lot of radioactivity around. I called the new ones that don't laugh, but I called the new ones environmentally friendly or green bombs, because they have been engineered to be very precise. They put a big bang out and they don't leave a lot of waste around. However, if you were to have an attack somewhere around you and you're outside of the fireball, which forget your toast, it turns into the cinder the blast area

is going to radiate to. That's usually about fifteen to twenty miles from a target. If you're outside there, you're gonna end up having southwesterly winds Harry Fallout. The simple thing I would do in my house, I've got a large front room. I would close all of my windows, I would close all my doors. I would have a enough water, which is one gallon per person per day for about four days in my house. I would put it in five gallon buckets or in bath in a bathtub you want to stay

though, in the center of the house. Here's the other thing people don't realize the first time in probably one hundred years, our water system is as frail or as fragile as our food system. We depend on it being pumped to us. We don't have wells like we used to have. Most people don't. So if you've got a large room and you get in the middle

of it, excuse me. You have some sleeping bags, maybe a few games for the kids to play off to the side, covered pail to use as a toilet, put a plastic bag inside of it and cover on it, and you can change the plastic bags if it gets bad enough. But you need to have food for about four days. You need to have water for about four days. If there are four people in the family, you need sixteen gallons of water, one gallon per one day per one person.

That's called the rule of three. Staying in the center of your house does this plugging the doors with blankets, making if you've got enough tape, do it, but turn your HVAC system off. The air outside your house is going to be contaminated if you keep that outside of the air inside your house. What you have happened is the radiation will come through a window. You don't have to have shielding like they say. It helps if you've got a basement. Excuse me, I mean you don't have to be in a lead

lead shielded room or concrete shielded room. It helps to be in that, But if you're in the middle of your house. Physics principle comes in with nuclear weapons comes into play called the invert square rule, which means this, if you have a one thousand rankins that's deadly outside your house, it comes through one foot. It diminishes every one foot twenty five percent. So instead of one thousand rankings one foot within your inside your window, in your space,

there's no radiation that's come in there. It's just that the level coming through drops to twenty five percent. A further foot that it goes, it drops to another twenty five percent, So a thousand rankings is deadly. Two

hundred and fifty rankings over a period of time will kill you. It's also a time related thing, but just the simplesty one foot inside one thousand drops to two fifty another foot, it drops to sixty two and a half another foot, it drops around sixteen another foot, which is total of four feet. If you're within or further than four feet eat away from your your windows, in a center of a room with no air movement from the outside, you're basically in the about the same level as a radio as a X ray

would give you. Now you don't have to stay there for months like everybody thinks, you can stay there, probably two days. Here's what else comes into play. There's with nuclear explosions. There's something called the seven to ten rule, which means this every every I forgot one this. This is also diminishing over distance or diminishing over time. For every one hour, say that

you had fall out of a thousand rankings, which is deadly. If you walk out and stay in an hour, you're so irradiated that and irradiation is like invisible bullets going through your body, literally causing the hemorrhage inside. But if that thousand rankings is out there for one hour, after one hour drops to seven tenths of what it was, and it continues to go down for

every hour thereafter. So there's two factors, time and distance. And if you stand in the middle of your house and stay there for two or three days, the radiation level, there's factors involved in this. I don't want to go into, but the radiation level will generally be safe maximum one week, but I would say four days. I don't know if any place in this country would get hit that bad, but guarantee yourself one thing. Before there is an all out attack on the United States of any kind, they'll

set an EMP off and that emp will kill everything that's electronic. Our electrical system will go down, our water system will go down. So if you're inside that house at least four days later, you mostly are going to be able to walk up with your wife and kids and generally be safe. That's because the radiation is decaying and half life is there. And so and I had a good question as we're thinking about that. You say, in general four days, you know, as kind of a rule of thumb, has

has the type of radiation that the used. Is that change because different radioactive materials have a different half life or is that still just you know, kind of a general rule of thumb. We don't know exactly. I guess you know what kind of radiation you're going to be exposed to, what kind of element radioactive elements, But I guess you know the four days at that point that decay is going to it's going to be neutralized. Right. Yeah.

Look, people have to understand one thing. This is not like Chernobyl. If you have a radiation leak, it's like a it's like a container of gasoline getting tipped over. That's a radiational leak. If you have a nuclear explosion, it's like that pale exploding. If you're far away from the explosion, all you're going to have is carbon and water from the explosion, most likely in the air. An explosion and a radiation leak or two totally different

things. Chernobyl. Yeah, maybe twenty thousand years. They can get back into that place because it was a leak. The explosion basically consumes much of the energy from the interaction of the YouTube thirty five to thirty eight exchange. It it's eliminated in the explosion. The point being that the stuff is going to drop all over outside your house, but it's going to go away.

That's really important. I think that's what a lot of people don't really understand it because you do think about that, you know, Chernovo, I remember they had the top gear crew, you know, drove through there and they're looking at the radiation that's still really very strong there. And that's what people don't realize. It's not going to be this persistent thing and an explosion like

we see with Chernobyl. That's important, I think, no. And if you go into the blast area, it's going to be high radioactive there. The fireball, the fireball actually is probably a mile to two miles. The fireball is the only area that radioactivity will be fused into water molecules. Otherwise, outside there it doesn't attach water molecules at tax to impurities in the water model. But people confuse Chernobyl with a nuclear explosion two totally different things,

like spilling a can of gasoline versus it exploding. Yeah, yeah, when it explodes, you're gonna have a shrapnel from the can and you're going to have a blast effect. But you're not going to have any gasoline left. That is that is really important. And again, you know, people need to you know, we need to try to do what we can, but there really isn't much that we can do to influence these politicians. They're influenced

by the amount of money they're making. And we just had another thing come out of another and this is John Solomon, who really is careful about his research. He says he just found another one hundred and twenty million that the Biden's got out of Barisma. You know, there's just so much there. It's just this cesspool. And so you know, we're not really I don't think we're going to be able to influence anything to do this. So we've got prayers. That's you know, isn't the last thing that we do.

It's the first thing we do to pray about this. And that's really about the only way that we're going to influence the outcome of this. But it's important to prepare. Like I wanted to say, but I tell people to listen to you. I listened to the radio coming home in a radio station I listened to and it's a syndicated news and they were talking all about the

Georgia indictments against Trump followed Trump is a criminal, you know. And then now you're telling me about one hundred and twenty million dollars coming out of you know, of corruption money. I'd like to I'm a tooth and eyes guy. I would like to propose that they take ten billion of this money they're sending to the Ukraine or Israel and fix Americans teeth and give them vision care. What happened to our great Obamacare system? I was supposed to take care

of all of that. I saw the prettiest lady the other day. I won't say w're, but she was. She was in a store and she was very conscious about the fact she had a tooth missing. And I didn't say anything to her, but I know she can't get it a fix because I know what that stuff costs a dollar. Fix Americans, yeah, give them vision care. That's what we need to do. I mean, we're given one hundred and sixty billion. Oh, they're not going to do anything

to help us. They're looking at how they can shut down our food supply. I mean, you know, how do we have an come up with an excuse so we can kill all the cattle? I mean, it's just it's crazy what they're doing. I don't have to talk to any of these Americans again. Listen to them. They are laser focused on harming us. And that's both parties and that's everybody in Washington. That's why I say, you know, our hope is in God, and where we work needs to

be at our local level. I think, and certainly we all experience that during twenty twenty, we know that it was either better or worse depending on your local government. It is truly always interesting to talk to you Jack. And again, folks, if you want to see what he was just talking about, that chapter is available for free. You can also see the chapter on how to make sure that You've got water that's going to last. That's also available for free. Those are two of the key things, especially in

the world that we live in right now. But that'll give you an idea of just how thorough his work is. In Civil Defense Manual, Civil Defensemanual dot com. It is a great resource. I had somebody contact me and said, yeah, I got this and it was worth more than ten times what I paid for it. So I agree with that. I've looked at this and everybody I've shown it to is just amazed at how thorough and extensive it is. And it's great advice because it's not just about physical stuff.

It's also about relationships. And you're not going to make this as a lone ranger. You need to have that community that's there. Thank you so much for joining us. Jack appreciate it. Thank you, Thank you well that said, folks for today's show, Thank you for joining us. Have a great weekend, and we'll talk to you hopefully on Monday. I'm leaving. I'm leaving the Zoom the common Man. They created common Core and dumb down

our children. They created common Past to track and control us. They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons

are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com