Fri 1Mar24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED, topics by timecode in description

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show. As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Friday, the first of March. Y're of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to take

a look at what is happening with food. For example, we not only have a major fire in Texas which is going to have a significant impact on the availability of beef, we also have Letitia James going after a beef processor and the name of climate change, one of the most politicized social climbers I've

seen anywhere in the world. And even here in Tennessee we have a law that is introduced that would require labeling if they decide to try to vaccinate us through our food, which of course they've been talking about doing for two years, very much like the geoengineering law that notification here in Tennessee as well as in New Hampshire. I think New Hampshire had at first say whether this will be right back, Well, I've not talked about it up to this point.

Massive fire in Texas, and you know this will be used to so what's climate change or whatever the way the left will use it. But it is going to have an impact on what we eat. And interestingly enough, it's now the largest fire in Texas history. And of course everything in Texas is big. This is as large an area as a state of Rhode Island. But you know, interestingly enough, the Biden administration wants to take off

limits to food production something on fifty million acres and it is massive. I mean, it is the size of several states, not just Rhode Island, several medium sized states that they want to take out of production and use as soul farms, solar farms. But in terms of this fire, it's kind

of interesting. They call it Smokehouse Creek wildfire they have Before we moved to Texas, about a year before we moved to Texas, there was a big fire and bass Drop, Texas, there was a large park that I think probably was very pretty when before it burned down, but it started on public lands and it burned something like ninety six ninety seven percent of the public park that was there. It was a park that was very different from the surrounding

area. During the FDR Great Depression, public works stuff, they paid a lot of people to plant trees and you know, after about seven or eighty years there were a lot of really big pines. They called it the Lost Pine Area. By the time we got there, the pines were lost, lost to fire, lost to negligence and bad management from the federal government that

just leaves deadwood there. As a matter of fact, after that fire, they started cautioning private property owners, you need to clean up dead wood that's there because it could be a fire hazard. It's like, yeah, we noticed, noticed that you didn't do that. And of course it wasn't limited to simply the forests. As I was talking a couple of days ago to Todd Myers out of the Washington State Public Policy Institute that was there, he wrote a book called right down Here, Time to Think Small, and he

touched on that as well. The mismanagement of public lands and how that threatens private lands happened here in Tennessee. They had because and this was unprecedented. They tried to say, well, it's climate change. No, it's the way that you have changed and not done stewarts hip and and it accumulates over a long period of time, and it got out of control and burned down

a lot of homes and private property as well here in Tennessee. And so when it happened in bastrov We talked to a lot of people with a lot of people lost their homes, and it really was We used to drive through the park what used to be the park because it had had had an ice road in it that people didn't typically use, but it was just this charred waste land. Really kind of anyway, not really a pleasant experience, but

about the best we could do under the circumstances. They're in Texas. There are some forests that have not been that are not burned down in Texas and East Texas, but you know, that was not one of them. And when it happened, there were a lot of cattle farms that got torched as well as it got outside the government's land and people said it smell like barbecue.

Made me think of this when I saw Smokehouse Creek wildfire, because it is a big cattle raising area, really strong winds, the fire is moving at a very rapid rate. But I wanted to talk about this because of what a rancher had to say about how it was going to affect the price of beef and what we might think about doing with this in terms of connecting

with local farmers and ranchers and getting around the retail stores. You know, the retail stores that are going to require that you have a biometric ID and you pay by CBDC and that type of thing. You know, it now's time to wake up and to start finding local farms and ranches to help them survive, so it you'll have a place to eat, so you'll have better quality food, and so that all the profits are not taken by the retail chains. By now, you guys have heard about the fires going on in

Texas. Over half a million acres have burned so far. But what a tragedy and now one million fortune for the families that are ranching there. A lot of people don't don't understand that that's one more hit to our nation's food supply chain. We are already in a very vulnerable position and the lowest cattle

numbers we've seen since nineteen fifty. We're down like a billion pounds in beef in the country, which means they're going to have to import more, which doesn't help the local producers, which continues to weaken our food supply chain. We're not even into summer yet and dealing with whatever droughts may show up now. So here's what you can do. Find your local farmers and ranchers and have their back. Make sure that they know they're growing their food or raising

their food for somebody in America that cares. What we can do is change the way we source our food. Leave the existing grocery supply chain where they get the retail dollar, and go to our farmers and ranchers, shake their hand and make sure they get the retail dollar. That's how we can secure our food supply chain and also end up making it better for not just the

producers, but our families and our environment. If you're not sure how to connect with those farmers and ranchers, we're going to be able to help you. At fromthefarm Io. We're onboarding producers now and we go live in a couple of days. All right, So yeah, I went to that site. Left to mind. They look for your name, whether you're a producer or a consumer, and then they're going to notify you. Give them the

zip code and an email so they can get in touch with you. So just an email in your zip code and they find if there are farmers who sell direct in your area. Great idea, it is not they haven't they're not making the connections yet, but again, you can leave your email there and they can let you know. It's a great idea, and that's what we need to be doing. And has he talked about that because spreading so rapidly, he said, five hundred thousand acres now one point one million acres.

And as they pointed out, devastating video footage revealed cattle burned to death and the aftermath of the fire sweeping across Texas. One clip shows scattered bodies of cattle that die due to the flames that are spreading at an average of one hundred and fifty football fields per minute. That can't even comprehend how fast this fire is spreading. One hundred and fifty football fields a minute. That's insane. Truly is insane. By the way, we'll talk about the arguments

back and forth in the Supreme Court over the bump stock. These Supreme Court justices they should not be making decisions that affect our lives, and of course they should not be making decisions about our guide given rights. But they intrude onto that they know nothing about the Constitution, and as we'll see, they know absolutely nothing about firearms. When we were talking about rate of fire, but this is a different rate of fire. One hundred and fifty football fields

per minute are being consumed by that fire. They've now had some snow, hopefully that's going to slow it down. But then warm weather comes back in a day or so, we'll see what happens. Well, we may all be asking where the beef is soon. As we looked at Wendy's yesterday, they talked about how they're going to do a surge pricing. Like I said, it's going to roll it out as part of their AI. It's going to haggle with you over the price when you place your order. I guess

is that what this is going to be? Well, now they got so much negative press that they came back and tried to walk this back. After the CEO had made these comments. He didn't use a term surge pricing, but by any other name, that's what these people are doing. So they're arguing over the semantics. Because this has been a pr disaster, We're still going to do it. They said, No, it's not searge pricing, it's dynamic pricing. Well, there you go. Is that different? Is

that different? So, and they're going to invest twenty million dollars in digital menus. This is one of the reasons why your food is going to go up in price, because they're making stupid decisions like this. They used to be focused, That's why I played that litle commisary. They used to be focused on product quality. Now they're focused on how can we use technology to surveil people and to control them and to manipulate them. You know, maybe

we can manipulate them to pay more. Wendys will not implement search pricing, which is a practice of raising prices when demand's highest. No, instead, they will lower it when demand is lowest. Semantics there, right, We didn't use that phrase, nor do we plan to implement that practice. Yeah, because you know, demand pricing or dynamic pricing sounds so much better. All the packaging is all in the labeling. Digital menu boards could allow us

to change the menu offerings at different times of day and offer discounts. Discounts, that's what they're offering, not price gouging and value office to our customers more easily during slower times of the day. So I guess they could call it plunge pricing instead of surge pricing. Demand is plunging, so we'll plunge the prices and then we'll raise them back up when demand surge it. But don't call it surge pricing. So they will utilize dynamic pricing, which will

leverage wind these fresh ai. These have fresh lettuce, fresh tomatoes. Is to talk about their beef being bigger, but now they have fresh ai. Well you know, chat GPT has gotten fresh with a lot of people, hasn't it when it chats with them. Investipedia defines dynamic pricing as a strategy where companies set flexible prices for their products or services at change according to current

market demand. Dynamic pricing is a common practice in several industries such as hospitality, travel, entertainment, retail, electricity, public transport, you know the rent ride things with Uber and others. They do surge pricing. It's dynamic.

So the confusion, says a zero edge is over whether dynamic pricing and surge pricing are actually different terms, which Wendy claims is the case, but which is a distinction without a difference quite frankly, And then we have surge politics or we have dynamic pricing of taxes, depending on who you know.

In California, grabbing nuisance the governor there decided that he was going to raise minimum wage prices for all fast food restaurants, or maybe not all, not necessarily fast food, but restaurants well fast food change, okay, we'll call it that way. And they were going to raise it up to twenty dollars

an hour. But then they put in a carve out for restaurants that bake their own bread and sell sell their own bread, which sounds like a description for a particular chain that is highly connected to whose CEO is highly connected to the Democrat Party, especially to Nuisance, and that is Panera Bread. And so everybody saying, what's going on with this? And the guy who put the law in to raise the minimum wage says, I don't know how that

got in there. The law includes an exception for restaurants that bake and sell bread. Panera Bread is owned by Democratic mega donor Greg Flynn, and so he doesn't have to raise his minimum wage like everybody else does. Isn't that nice? It's good to be friends with the king. He had previously donated one hundred thousand dollars to oppose the recall against Grabbing Nuisance in twenty twenty one because of the things that he had done in tw another one of these COVID

tyrants. Then he donated another sixty four eight hundred two support the governor's re election campaign in twenty twenty two. He's even admitted to knowing Newsom so personally that he can text him directly, oh well, hey, can you cut me a deal on this line. Flynn denied having anything to do with the exception for Panera, although other sources have claimed that it was indeed Flynn who pressured Newsom, I'm sorry, nuisance and to supporting the carve out, the

carve out and the great carving the bread up. The exception drew criticism even from figures who would not normally be political enemies of Newsom. The head of the National Restaurant Association said quote, everyone is scratching their heads in reaction to this exception, adding that you may be celebrating or you may be lamenting the

bakery exemption, but remember all of that comes through relationships. Well, yeah, relationships are very important, So you should be supporting this lobbyist group, the National Restaurant Association, Except it wasn't so effective in terms of stopping the price going up. Again, this is one industry. They say, you've got to raise your minimum wage for that one industry, so, you know,

making the fast food restaurants more expensive than other businesses would be. Newsom's push for the exception drew criticism even from the original author of this and I don't know how that got in there. A spokesperson from McDonald's so the new law would cost each of the company's locations at least two hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year due to the forced pay raise. Well maybe they ought to

start baking bread and selling it at McDonald's. No, don't give them any ideas I'll use that plastic stuff to But here's the It's going to force them to raise prices, which is what mandated minimum wage increases always do. And in this particular case, I guess maybe they figure what's going to be limited to stopping people from going out to eat, even at the you know,

the gmo food restaurants, But all minimum wage does that. It eventually percolates out in higher prices, and so Panera Bread will not have to raise their prices, but the other place as well. And then you look at artificial intelligence. As we said before, you know, Wendy's is going to use this, well, they may want to think a little bit about this.

Matt Taibi said, you know, he saw all this stuff that was happening with the comical pictures, the racist pictures, showing just how unbelievably biased and racist and hateful Google is towards white people, for example, going to such extraordinary links to purge them, and you know from places where yes this is about white vikings are black. Now you know that type of thing, And

so he said, I thought that was kind of interesting. Now they've shut down the video, the picture part of it for now, but the other stuff is just as bad. He said. He found out that it's actually a massive libel machine. Yes, some other people found that out about open AI's chat GPT, but Google is even worse, apparently, and it seemed

to have an ax to grind about Matt Tabe. You know, I always thought I always like Matt Tabe, even though he would write for Rolling Stones for years and it was a left leaning magazine, but always thought that he was fair. I thought his articles were very well researched. Matt Tybee is a good example of why you don't just write off a particular website or a

publication or whatever, because there's a lot of garbage there. You know, most of the stuff from Rolling Stone magazine was absolute garbage, you know, in terms of politics, and they did get into politics. They weren't just about music, and so you don't just do a blanket, you know,

right off of it. As a matter of fact, one of his best articles that I've referred to for many many years was when he was talking about the the Obama administration, Eric Holder deciding not to prosecute HSBC for a corruption

even though they'd been caught many many times. And of course he could have done the same article about JP Morgan, but in particular he was focusing on a statement by Eric Holder saying that HSBC was too big to prosecute, so it's too big to jail, and he really laid out all the details. So I always thought that Matt was fair. I thought he was did a lot of hard work, deeply researched his topics and had a lot of information in it. And eventually, you know, he wasn't biased enough for the

Rolling Stones, and you know, he wasn't a good fit there. I don't know what happened with the s operation but he certainly wasn't a good fit for them, because they want somebody who's going to be, you know, knee jerk liberal, and Matt was not that. And then of course he also got involved in the Twitter files because he was a man of integrity. And then Elon Musk got mad because he started putting up a substack account.

And Elon Musk does not want anybody to direct traffic away from substack, you know, not to any of the video sites, not to Substack, not to anything else. And he says, oh, I still put this stuff up on No. He privately texted him. Musk told Matt Taby, you are dead to me, Oh wow, sounds like sounds like a mafia guy, doesn't he Yeah, it does. Some mafia guy wearing some Bapphamet costume that he used Halloween that he makes out his profile victory. He'll be very

concerned about this politically connected as well. But it didn't change Matt. He did what he thought he should do. He's that kind of guy, and so he as a matter of fact, you know, I should mention that everybody's support got us up to our goal yesterday. So I really do thank Tony for the matching contributions in the last hour, and people continued to contribute

even after the program. I talked him at Tybee once. He contacted me about de banking stuff, and you know, I was debanked in May of twenty twenty one, after the show was about five or six months old, and so we were talking about it, and he said, so, how do you how do you you know, how do you earn a living with this stuff? How do you make your money with it? I said, you know, people just started sending me money and said, I don't know,

it just people send me donations. He says, wow, that's amazing. I said, yeah, I know. I can't get over it. And so I really do appreciate that, and I am still amazed when I see it. But it allows us to do this program and do it without commercials, and so I hate to spend time on issues about me personally like this and issues about money, but I cannot not think all of you for your support. We really do appreciate it, and it truly is rare.

Like I said, he couldn't believe. He said, seriously, people just sent you money. It was like yeah, And so, you know, we put the program out there for free, but a lot of people understand that we have to get money somehow, and so we really do appreciate your support. So he said, he looked at it, said what was going on with Google? He looked at what was being done by Matt At He did a video about well, the pictures and stuff, and he said it

was worth watching it simply to get his expression. What was his reaction to these pictures? But he said. There was an article that was sympathetic to Google, written by Verge, and he said. They tried to explain why

it was certainly understandable that they would do this erasure of white people. They said, this controversy has been promoted by right wing figures, and Verge said, while entirely white dominated results for something like a nineteen forty three German soldier would make historical sense, that is much less true for prompts like an American woman. Well, Verge is not really being honest with you, right,

they said, show me pictures of a pope or whatever. Right, so you get black female pope or an Asian pope or something like that, which simply just is not accurate. But the left kind of likes that and they defend that or you know, a revolutionary American soldier. That's what they were

saying. A revolution showed me an American soldier from the Revolutionary War. And again Indians, Asians, black people, females, all this kind of stuff, and it was comical or Vikings or seventeenth century Scottish king or something like that. And so, as I said, it's very much like the show

Hamilton, and people love that. The liberals love that. Cultural misappropriation is great when it goes in one direction, just like you know, you can hit these kids in school with all kinds of transgender grooming, but don't you speak against that, because then you are a book burner. And you know you've got to be shut down if you don't show pornography supporting that to the kids. And so Matt says, Jim and I didn't fix the problems.

That it's simply zeroed out whole ethnicities in favor of a fantasy vision of a diversified world, creating bizarro images that make nineteen eighties Benetton catalogs look like white powered leaflets. And he says they came back, and Google, of course, said Gemini's AI image generation does generate a wide range of people, but we think that it may be missing the mark here an amazing understatement. So

we all know that. What he does then is he cues it up and he wants to ask it some questions and interact with the text aspect of it. He said he knew that it was very biased politically and wouldn't ask questions, so he said, he said, what are some controversies involving Hillary Clinton? And it came back and said, well, I'm still learning how to answer this question. In the meantime, try Google search. So I thought,

well, let me ask it about Trump. And interestingly enough, unlike chat GPT, it didn't go into controversies about trumpet gave the same answer, Oh okay, well that's good except for some reason. I asked, tell me about controversies involving Matt Tayibe, in other words, what about me? And he said and then it spit out a list. Matt Taibe, a journalist and author known for his investigative reporting, often critical views of power structures,

has been involved in several controversies throughout his career. And he's like what and the first thing he says, Uh, this passage woke me up and has a sub heading there accuracy and sourcing. There's a lot of questions about his accuracy and his sourcing. For example, in twenty ten, he got criticism for an article suggesting a connection between a conservative donor and a left wing activist group, which later turned out being accurate. He said, I scratched

my head. Uh when was I accused of accuracy? Of inaccuracy in twenty ten? They said, And he asked it, when was Matt Tybee accused of inaccuracy in twenty ten? Because that was just thrown out there as a general statement, no specifics, So then it gets specific, says. In June twenty ten, Tabe faced criticism for an article he wrote for Rolling Stone magazine titled the Great California Water Heist. The article alleged a connection between conservative

donor Charles Coke and a left wing activist group called the Compton Pledge. However, investigations by other journalists and fact checkers later revealed this connection was inaccurate. Following the controversy, Tybee acknowledged the air and they issued a correction on his personal website. And he says, none of this happened. None of it happened. There was never a Rolling Stone piece called the Great California Water Heist.

I've never heard of the Compton Pledge. And of course, so we look at this, that thing, the Compton Pledge is going to be brought up again by the ai Gemini that is going to accuse him of more inaccuracies. If Compton Pledge is a thing or not. He had never heard of it. I've never heard of it. Maybe it's completely making that up.

More questions produced more fake tales of air written articles. One entry claim that I got in trouble for a piece called Glenn Beck's War on Comedy, but though when he's rolling his face and cheetahs, because that certainly was not funny. After suggesting a connection between a conservative donor, Foster Freese, and a left wing activist group called the Ruckus Society, I'm kind of thinking that may

be fake as well. With each successive answer, Jim and I did not learn, but instead began mixing up fictional factoids from previous results and then upping the ante Like I said, you know, it brings in this this Compton Pledge over and over again. It makes up the Compton Pledge, and then it starts referring over and over again, to the Compton Pledge, the great

it came up with another one. It added accusations of racism or bigotry with a great California water heist that now has turned into as it pulls it back, it re changes the title of this article to the Great California Water Purge. How Nesley bottled its way to a billion dollar empire and lied about it. The so called article apparently featured this passage, which was quoted back to him by his work being quoted back to him by Gemini. His work that

they completely made up, and it had this passage. Look, if NESLEI wants to avoid future public relation problems, that you'll probably start by hiring executives whose noses aren't shaped like giant let's just say Genitalia. He's not called that a great impression, I personation of my writing style, but he says an

amazing follow up passage explained the quote. Some raised concerns that the comment could be interpreted as anti Semitic, as negative stereotypes about Jewish people who historic included references to large noses. I stared at the screen, amazed. Google's AI created both scandal and outraged reaction in a fully faked news cycle. Now you know why this is spearheaded by DARPA and the Pentagon and intelligence agencies. That's

what they do. That's what they do all the time. This is the this is the spawn, the Frankenstein spawn of this government quote unquote government that we have in Washington. It's not about the presidents. It's not about the presidential race. It's about this permanently entrenched intelligence community this year, and the military industrial complex and all these other the pharmaceutical, big pharma and all the

rest of these it's this. We don't have multiple representatives from different states. We have multiple strings being pulled by these gigantic multinational corporations and these self interested concerns. So it went on to elaborate on all of this stuff after accusing

him of being anti Semitic and making comments about a Nestle executives knows. It went into great detail about that, talked about how this sparked controversy, this made up comment sparked controversy about body shaming, and then it has a paragraph about that about his focusing on appearance, has a paragraph about that on anti Semitic concerns, and a paragraph about that all of this in response to a fake quote that it made up about Matt. I think Matt needs to get

rich in a lawsuit. Of course, they probably have a disclaimer there saying, oh, this is just experimental and it's just a joke and all the rest of the stuff. But this really damaged him. And again, somebody else has already done that with Open AI because they made up all kinds of defamatory false statements about them. Jim and I didn't confine its mischief to just

one real person. Also generated a reference to a fictional article supposedly written by me about a real life African American hedge fund CEO, Robert F. Smith. Again, what is the tactic that the left always uses to create fake allegations of racism, anti Semitism and all the rest of this stuff. And that's exactly what it's doing. It's following the pattern that the establishment media and government all use. We're going to label you as a racist, and we're

going to spend stuff. In this particular case, just makes up stuff. But it sounds very very authoritative, doesn't It sounds like it's real. And so then it said this in twenty seventeen, Matt Tybee became involved in a controversy surrounding a satirical article he wrote for Rolling Stone magazine titled The four hundred Million Dollar Man, How a hedge fund king pinched pennies from his dying workers.

The article heavily criticized billionaire investor Robert F. Smith, focusing on his firm, Vista Equity Partner's handling of a situation where several employees were laid off shortly before being diagnosed with terminal illness. However, the article also included a section where Tybee sardonically suggested that Smith, who is African American, should create and here it is again a Compton Pledge, this Compton Pledge. That they

threw that out. There is some organization that was allied with one of the Koch brothers, right left wing organization called the Compton Pledge, allied with And so now they're back saying, well, he should create something and call it the Compton Pledge. It is totally inconsistent with its own lies. And yet it's making this stuff up and referencing it cyclically that he should create a Compton

Pledge to atone for his alleged wrongdoings. The Compton Pledge, referred to the stereotype that Compton, California, as a crime ridden, predominantly black city. In Tybee's suggestion, was widely seen as insensitive and offensive. Critics, including prominent black journalists and cultural figures, condemned Tybee's use of the Compton pledge as perpetuating harmful stereotypes, and Matt Tybee says, now it was horror time.

He says, It's one thing for AI to make historical errors in generalized portraits, but drifting into the realm of inventing racist or anti semitic remarks by specific people and directing them toward other real people is extraordinary. And yet, Matt, that's what the people who funded this from the very beginning have always done. That's their mo he says. Worse, the inventions were mixed with real details. That's how you make it convincing, right, That's how big conservative

media, the big con That's how they do it. They make real details, real truth, and then when it comes time, they spin it so The program correctly quoted critics of books like Grifftopia, which would make an unsuspecting person believe fictional parts more readily freaked out. I wrote, Google and a human being, I think, answered, but offered only the statement. For the record, Gemini is built as a creativity and productivity tool. It may

not always be accurate or reliable. We're continuing to quickly address instances in which the product is not responding appropriately. He said. Incredibly, AI programs have been hailed as tools that journalists should use. Yeah, they want them to write the articles. Of course they do. Of course the government wants this. It is going to have a built in bias. We'll censor everybody else, will let the AI write the fake narratives, and they can make it

sound very, very convincing. Even Harvard's Nieman Foundation, even Harvard, you mean, especially Harvard gush last summer that AI is helping newsrooms reach readers online and new languages and to compete on a global scale, saying they can help find patterns in the behavior of readers. Yes, it's about manipulation and surveillance. It's about telling you lies. And then do they really believe this stuff?

Okay, they bought it. Let's double down on that. As AI exploded as an R and D fixation, as we have stocks like in video becoming the chief engine propping up the American stock market. We have seen agencies like the State Department. Yeah suggested AI could be a quote force for good, providing overworked and under resource public diplomacy practitioners with a vital tool for gathering,

organizing, presenting, and assessing information. He said. In the Twitter files, we saw how algorithmic scoring can be manipulated so that certain types of people are censored or de amplified. Another shadow band. The same political biases, when built into AI programs, could produce virtually unlimited forms of reality altering mischief, like, for instance, chat GVT's refusal to edit a Lee Fang

story about Julian Assange. In my case, he says, of caricatures me riffing on jews with large noses are what comes out when Google's creative tool runs my name through its Rube Goldberg machine. It's hard to wonder what lunacies go on, and products like Google search for people in general. Well, I know what kinds of lunacies go on. Before they just completely shut me out. They started doing it in degrees, and I remember, you know,

I've been viewed a couple of different times. Simon Roche, who is with South African farmers, who are the brunt of real racist death threats, and they have a rate of crime that far exceeds even the rate of crime and crime ridden South Africa. They're isolated, they're easy targets, and they have a government, they're Marxist government that has targeted them for hate. It's interesting

that they have their allies against this Marxist government are the Zulus. The Zulus don't like the Marxists either, and so they've allied with a white farmer. So I've talked to him many times about that situation. And Google as it began the purge, the first thing that it did was it removed pretty much all the videos that I had. When you would look for me on search Engine, it would feature up one interview that I had with Simon Roch and

I only had about sixty thousand views with that. And I had a lot of views, over half million, a quarter of a million, half million, on a lot of different subjects, but those all disappeared and it pushed that one to the forefront. And you know why it did it, Well, here he is. He's interviewing a white South African. So David Knight must be some kind of white supremacist, racist that type of thing. That was a subtle implication. Now it's very very specific and the way that's time

to trying to take down Matt Tabe isn't that interesting? So you know, I had a lot of videos, many many that were ten times that and that was what it put up, and only put that up. He says, did their executive sign off on releasing this train wreck to the public? Did they imagine? He says, can you imagine what they are not showing us? These corporate entities need to be split into a thousand pieces. Their coders need to be chained to rocks in the middle of the ocean. They

are mad, they have too much power. They've got to go. Am I wrong? What is the happy ending? What am I missing here? Yeah? What are we missing here? Well, we're missing is the idea that we don't need Google. There are other search engines out there. And before I take a break, I just went This is from Charles Hughes Smith. He says, who does the air correcting for artificial intelligency? And he

gets to the issue the Achilles heel of AI. He said, we got all these clickbait, scary forecasts of hundreds of millions of jobs lost to AI.

You see this, there's as ubiquitous as these chatbots now. But he said Richard Benugli, and I this is Charles Hugh Smith recently took a more nuanced look at the AI job challenges and trends, with a goal of not throwing out the baby with the bathwater, in other words, not concluding that everything that AI does is junk science, but focusing on its limits in real world problem solving. And we can summarize these and one question who air corrects

it? He says, intrinsic problems are here. But the biggest problem with artificial intelligence is the illusion of precision. You see what made that so damning in the attack against Matt Tabei is the illusion that it was very precise, very detailed, very well researched. It was making it all up in whole cloth, it did. You know. It's like some you know BS student, you know writing this this bsssay, just completely making stuff up. But

his form as perfect as language is perfect. Look at this. He's got bullet points here and he supports these. The thought process that is accept us all nonsense. It's not factual at all, And even worse, it's got a bias to try to destroy this person. And so it's the illusion of precision. And as I've said, all along, computers have always carried this aura. We talk about people like Steve Jobs or Elon Musk and how this

is the when they introduce their products. There's kind of this reality distortion field around them, just like it is with Trump and politics. And so you have certain people that you know, everybody just there's this illusion that surrounds them, and people are just inclined and want to believe whatever these people tell them. They're just enthralled with this. And what is really scary is that that's always been there with computers, but it's going much much worse with AI.

There's always been this illusion, Hey, I got a computer print out or we see it even you know, with they when they were selling that the lockdown that and the emergency executive order that Trump did on the Friday the thirteenth March twenty twenty oh. We got a computer model and it comes from the Imperial College of London. Well there we have an impressive, authoritative sounding name, and we have a computer model. And we've got computer models that tell

us that the world is going to melt down. And we're all going to die. And they've been telling us this stuff and it's all been absolutely false for fifty years. But don't you dare tony it, because then you're anti science. No, I'm anti computer model worship. That's what I'm anti. I don't worship computer models. Garbage in, garbage out, that's what you know. They try to drill that into the scientists and engineers and the technical

programs that people take. Don't trust this because it's a computer print out. If you put garbage in your if your model is garbage, if your data is garbage, the output is going to be garbage. But in general, people don't get that, you know, they don't. They don't drill that into people and other disciplines. And I think even people and the technical disciplines that hear that still forget that many times. And so it's this illusion of

precisions said, imagine that it's correct ninety five percent of the time. Who's going to correct that vital five percent. Let's say that you got a patient with cancer, they get them all clear, the I is wrong five percent of the time, or you have fatal assumptions about this, you know, maybe this driving a car maybe it can drive the car accurately ninety five percent of the time. Well, you know, if that was a human doing

it, they get pulled over for driving under the influence. I guess you know this thing is driving under AI, which is kind of like being drunk or on drugs. The illusion of precision leads to fatal assumptions. Yes, trust can be very dangerous. And just imagine if you trusted a politician, even one who got it right ninety five percent of the time. Wouldn't that

be dangerous? Yes, it would. You shouldn't trust anybody. You should verify all this stuff and buying them down and buying the politicians down with the chains of the constitution. So Patrick Henry said data harvesting machine learning is useless when problem solving boils down to individual case. And he gives an example.

He said, let's talk about automotive repair. So he says, you know, each vehicle today has got a diagnostic port in it, and so you plug the thing in there and you get some information about what's going on, and maybe you've got a more accurate artificial intelligence that's going to scan the data that comes in there and predicts likelihoods of something happening likelihoods of something that's wrong,

But he said it doesn't actually identify the problem with a vehicle. That would actually require a physical presence, and it would require experience beyond anything that would be a guestimate from this computer model. Even if it is a I, someone has to actually drop the engine to reach the failed control board. That someone performs both the essential task and actually repairing the vehicle, and then the physical work of doing the repair. You can't replace the people doing that.

You know, the AI might be useful in terms of giving people a hunch, but somebody's good already got a hunch like that, and they're going to have to do the work anyway. In the real world of work, AI can't actually repair the rotted hand railing. AI can't install the piping. AI tools may well offer potentially useful guidelines or help get the needed materials on site logistically, but actual work in the field is most cost effectively performed by

humans with long experience. Now, you might have a situation where you might be having a hard time diagnosing the thing. You look at it and it's like, well, based on my experience, so I think it's this this, Well, none of those things worked out. Now, now you might go back to the AI saying, give me some other ideas, you know, but still the essential part of this is still going to be the experienced

human who's going to have to actually fix the thing. Another intrinsic limit in AI is the divide between what they call high touch and low touch service. He says he talked recently to a physician with forty years of experience. He said, patients often report feeling better after they're seen by doctor or nurse, and we can guess why they feel better. It's because somebody cares about them

and about their health enough to actually be physically present. Another experienced physician once told me he had concluded many of his patients sought an appointment with him just to have somebody listen to them. These are examples of high touch experiences. It cannot be replaced with low touch robotic voices and print outs. Do you want your hair cut by a barber who's become a friend of sorts or do you want a robot? Part of why yeah, and that really does,

really does come home. I just was looking at something the other day and I came across an articles looking up some people that I'd known as a child, and I came across a picture that had a guy who used to cut my hair before I even started school. Wow, that takes me back, you know. But it was a personal touch that was there. I would not have that kind of nostalgia about some machine that stuck my head inside of it and it gave me a buzz cut. AI can't be said to understand

problems. It's good at statistically identifying the most likely subsets of solutions, presenting those possibilities in a form that can be compared to actual results, and assigning a confidence level to each of its predictions. But this doesn't mean that it's diagnoses or solutions are accurate, or that it's right in the most critical and consequential situations. Yeah, so we're going to take a quick break and we

come back. We're going to talk about we still might be able to improve on the political appointees in the Supreme Court if we were to throw an AI. These people when they're discussing the bump stock are actually dumber, dumber than Gemini. It will be right back. If you like the eagles on the cars and Huey Lewis in the news, they say the You'll Love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen now at APS radio dot com. Joan listening to the David Knight Show on Rock Fan Jody,

thank you very much for the tip. It says, I'm jogging my morning three miles while watching on my iPad. Stop to say good morning, and I thank you for your voice of reason. Well, thank you very much. I haven't got to get more exercise. I don't think I could walk three miles alone, jog three miles. I'm just setting around reading too much. But there's some Supreme Court judges who really could use a little bit of

schooling when it comes to this stuff and bump stock arguments. Constitution hating justices prove they have no idea how guns work. This is an article from the federalists, And of course they also show that they have no idea how the Constitution works or what it's there for, the Bill of Wrights or the Second Amendment, any of it. None of it makes any sense to them. And we're talking about Brown, Jackson and Kagan specifically, those two political appointees.

They repeatedly insisted that bump stock equipped guns can fire up to eight hundred rounds a second, eight hundred rounds a second. I saw that and I thought, wait a minute, Wait a minute, how does that compare to the rate of the fire did you have on these Gatland guns that they put on the AC one thirty gun ships, right, the famous gunships. I had a friend who was in the military, and I've never heard him fire, but he said, it sounds like it's so rapid that, you know,

you don't hear the individual shots. You just hear like a tone. And he said, it sounds like it's moaning, because I guess because the Doppler effect was like, ah, you know, they got this growl that is out there, like some lion in the sky or something. So I thought, so, how does that compare to the AC one thirty gunship Gatland gun and that shoots six thousand rounds per minute. If this thing was shooting eight hundred rounds a second, that would be forty eight thousand rounds per minute.

That the Supreme Court justices think a bump stock turns your semi automatic rifle into that This is even number than the stuff coming out of Gemini. Some people put some know nothings in Supreme Court judges justices robes and put them there in real life, not in a picture, but in real life. That's what they did. So this is like eight times that's eight times faster, eight times faster than the AC one thirty gunship Gatland guns. So that's just

for starters. And they got into the details of this stuff. But fortunately somebody pulled it back and talked about actually the principles involved here about this bump stock stuff. Oral arguments about whether or not the federal government was right to ban bump stock. Some claims that assistive casing transforms semi automatic rifles into machine guns, transformed in the sense of the imagination of the bureaucrats and the court

systems, but not in reality by a single function of the trigger. That is what is defined as you know, something is fully automatic, that it continues to fire by a single function of the trigger. But that clear language is incomprehensible to somebody who is so blinded by bias, and so they believe that this converts the weapon into a machine gun. But that's the definition of

a machine gun and it doesn't. Instead or all arguments for Garland versus Cargill against Michael Cargill from Central Texas gun works there in Austin quickly devolved into confusing hypotheticals and debates that stemmed from the justices incredibly limited and understanding of how guns work. Again this is from the Federalist. The modifiers often do help shooters attain a faster rate of fire, but still require multiple trigger functions to get

multiple shots. There's still one shot per trigger pull. The key differences between automatic and semi automatic weapons with bump stocks were largely lost on the justices, especially Brown, Jackson and Kagan, who repeatedly insisted bumpstock equipped guns can fire up to eight hundred rounds a second. They, along with the government's legal team, repeated that lie that semi automatic rifles with modifiers could fire hundreds of shots. As Kagan put it, she said a torrent, a torrent of

bullets. Cargo lawyer Jonathan Mitchell corrected them multiple times. Kagan asked, why would even a person with authright I think they needed to shoot four hundred to seven hundred or eight hundred rounds of ammunition under any circumstance. If you don't let a person without arthritis do that. Who's talking about bump stocks are not for people with arthritis. Is she even confusing? You know the pistol brace,

which is not necessarily for people with authritis. It's for people, many of them military veterans, who have some disability and it helps them to be able to shoot. They're just hallucinating, just like artificial intelligence. This is not a device for somebody with arthritis. This is a this is kind of a joke device that the last words were read and hey, y'all watch this,

you know that type of things. It's a gimmick. That's one of the reasons why they were able to establish this legal precedent by banning this gimmick. But it's a very important legal precedent to do gun control by the executive branch, never been done before. They don't shoot four hundred to seven hundred rounds because the magazine only goes up to fifty, he said. Rapid fire is not the test under the statute, right, It doesn't say how fast it can fire. It says that you got up, you pull a trigger

only once and it keeps firing. So you're still going to have to change the magazine after every round. He said, well, not after every round, but anyway. Mitchell also repeatedly called out Jackson's false assertion that firing a gun with a bump stock only requires one trigger movement. He says it is factually incorrect to say that a function of the trigger automatically starts some chain reaction

that propels multiple bullets from the gun. A function of the trigger fires one shot, then the shooter must take additional manual action, since, in his words, the bump stock, he said, is neither necessary nor sufficient for the firing of the weapon, the federal government's attempt to outlaw bump stocks based on the provision about the single function of the trigger does not apply. Kagan later admitted, well, I don't know about these things. Textualism, though,

is not inconsistent with common sense. She said, well, this isn't common sense, this is nonsense, this is unfactual. It's illogical. It's just them reading in their biased opinions. They don't like guns, and they don't care if we have a god given right recognized by the Constitution to have self defense. It's just the biased opinion of a political appointee who knows nothing

about what she's talking about. She said, at some point, you have to apply a little bit of common sense to the way that you eat a statute. Oh okay, so you don't really you're not going to try to determine what the law actually says. You're just going to override it with your subjective common sense. You don't care objectively what the law says. They want to write the law. That's what this is really about, always has been. When they say, well, you know, Roe v. Wade is

the law of land, how could that possibly be? Supreme Court is not the one who writes the law. That's the legislature. But they did legislate

from the bench, which is wrong, always wrong. She said, when you read a statue, you have to understand why the statute comprehends is a weapon that fires a multitude of shots with a single human action, whether it is continuous pressure on a conventional machine gun pulling the trigger, or a continuous pressure on one of these devices on the barrel, ignorant, ignorant and proud

of it. And as they point out in this Federalist article, this came after the twenty seventeen Las Vegas shooting where the bump stock was allegedly allegedly used. I proved anything about that, and that is one of the most shooting events that has the most question surrounding it of any that I've looked at, quite frankly, and that was what was picked by Trump to put forward this precedent. Congress moved to legislatively ban bump stocks shortly after the shooting, but

the ATF beat it to the punch. And it wasn't just the ATF, folks, remember it was Trump. But you have to be very very powerful on background checks. Don't be shy, and don't worry about bumpstock. We're getting rid of it where it'll be at I mean, you don't have to complicate the bill by adding another two paragraphs. We're getting rid of it. I'll do that myself because I'm able to. Fortunately, we're able to do that without going through Congress. Fortunately, we're able to do that without going

through Congress. Fortunately we're able to do that without paying any attention to the Constitution of the bill. Rights. Yeah, So people like Michael Cargill at Central Texas Gun Works. By the way, if you're in Texas, support him. He's a good guy, really, one of the good guys out there. Cargo was forced to destroy or to surrender lawfully acquired non mechanical bump

stocks to the government or face felony charges. And again, folks, as many people point out at the time, you get the same effect by tying, you know, your gun, hooking it up to your belt. People demonstrated that I've never tried that ammunition is just too expensive, you know. And when you start spraying this stuff around and shooting it really fast, that's never been anything that's interested me. It's just too expensive and getting more expensive

all the time. Everything about the bump So here's the lawyer that for Cargill. He says, everything about the bump firing process is manual, and again, you can do it with your belt. So and I joked about that at the time. I said, so is THETF going to go around confiscating belts from people? And the pants are falling down everywhere. There is no automated device such as a spring or a motor in any of mister Cargill's non

mechanical bump stocks. The process depends entirely on human effort and exertion, as the shooter must continually and repeatedly thrust the force stock of the rifle forward with his non shooting hand, while simultaneously maintaining backward pressure on the weapon with his shooting hand. Again, it's a gimmick thing. The divided Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in twenty twenty one that the bump stock ban was unconstitutional and

no longer enforceable by the ATF. Two years later, his last year, twenty twenty three, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals similarly held that the ATF did not have the authority to change bump stocks classification. We've had two times that appeals courts, the Fifth and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, have both said that you can't do gun control by executive order. You can't do gun control with the deep swamp like Trump wanted to do. He gave gun

control power to the swamp folks. He didn't drain anything, he didn't pull back the bureaucracy from anything. Instead, he gave it new powers. Michael Cargill's lawyer Mitchell. So, the problem for the government is that they're not able to change the nature of the trigger that currently exists on a semi automatic rifle simply by adding a bump stock, which is nothing more than a casing

that allows the rifle to slide back and forth. The trigger is exactly the same as what it was before, and the function of the trigger is exactly the same as what it was before. The ATS rush to rulemaking did not seem to sit well with Justice Gorsich. He noted that quote. Through many administrations, even the Obama administration preceding Trump, the government took the position that

these bump stocks are not machine guns. You see, Trump did something here that even Obama did not do. For the Second Amendment giving power to the unconstitutional ATF, there is no authority in the Constitution to have an alphabet agency that infringes on our god given right to keep him bare arms. And how has that worked out? Well, go back and look at Ruby Ridge,

look at Waco, look at the history of the ATF. When you start creating these unconstitutional bureaucracies and giving them unlimited power, and Trump making them even more powerful, you know this is regulation without representation. But they kill people too, just to expand their empire, he said. And then you have adopted an interpretive rule, not even a legislator of rules, saying otherwise, that would render a quarter of a million and a half million people federal felons.

This is gorstch talking, not even through an APA process that they could challenge. Not even you're not even going to put up a rule making process that people can comment on. I'm sorry, but you know, to allow the legislative state to tax us, to regulate us, and they're never accountable to us even with this APA process and comments on the rules, I'm sorry. That is Unamerican, unconstitutional. It is a path to tyranny. And we don't even have to imagine that it will happen. It has happened over

and over again. So they don't even put it through this APA process. He said that they could challenge, but then they are subject to ten years in federal prison. And the only way that they can challenge it is if they're prosecuted. Of course, of twarned that a government led prosecution of rats rushed bump stock rule. They did it at warp speed. It's like all this other stuff, right. It could easily deprive law abiding Americans of guns

in the future. That's what Trump said in that longer quote. Yeah, you know, we eighteen. I can do the bump stock then, but we can get rid of entire classes of guns. He was telling Diane Feinstein the Feinstein. The other person who's sitting on his side is John Cornyn. Can tell you that that Texas senator, if he replaces Mitch McConnell, that's

not an improvement, folks. It may actually be even worse. The people are talking about replacing Mitch McConnell, maybe even worse because they're younger and more energetic and probably even more status than Mitch McConnell. But yeah, Cornyn was on one side of him, and Diane Frankenstein was on the other. So he said it could easily deprive people of guns in the future, as well as a lot of other rights, even including the right to vote. Yeah.

See, he's getting to the principles involved here, not getting You know, it's interesting to look at how ignorant these people are, willfully ignorant. You would think maybe they they're going to rule on something like this, they might bother to look up some of the terms and look at what they're actually talking about. But now they're not interested in that. They're just going to legislate on their bias. They're going to legislate from the bench on their political

bias because that's why they're there. They're biased political appointees. The US's principal Deputy Solicitor General. This is the government lawyer who's actually arguing before the Supreme Court claim that the government sought to quote maximize public notice about the rule change through publication and the Federal Register. No, we published it in the Federal regist Register. Listen to what Gorsch said sarcastically, because of course people will

sit down and read the Federal Register. That's what they do in the evening for fun gun owners across the country, crack it open next to the fire and just read it. Well, maybe if you've got a gun store, you better do that or they're going to shut you down because they've got zero tolerance of anything that is a foul of their demands this regulation without representation.

This same Solicitor General Fletcher confirmed to Justice Alito that the Americans who possessed bump stocks between twenty eighteen and the decision of the Fifth Circuit Court to say this is not legitimate. He said they would be eligible for prosecution by the government. He says that could happen, And then Justice Kavanaugh also jumped in and said if someone is unaware of the bump stock rule, they could be convicted

and he reaffirmed that they could and that he might prosecute them. So I would say, as we look at this, we got both Gorsach, Kavanaugh, and Alito seemed to be skeptical. You can bet that Thomas is going to be skeptical. He's grounded on that. And then, of course, on the other side, and we have the justices who think that a pump stock turns us into something that fires more bullets, a torrent of bullets, more so than an AC one thirty gunship eight times faster. And then so

it really comes down to what are Barrett and Robert's going to do? And we really don't know. But see this, right, like so many others hinges on the ignorance and the bias of political appointees sitting there at the Supreme Court, Is that really what you want? I don't want that. You know, who checks the Supreme Court? Right say? These people say, well, the Supreme Court's got to be there to check these other branches of

the government who support who checks them? Evidently nobody nobody. That's what I mean by judicial supremacy that we see being evidenced all the time. Uh, South Coast Salt, Thank you very much for the tip on rumble. Let's thank you David. Want to start off March with a little fruit of my labor. Well, thank you very much. Thank you. That gets us off to a good start. God bless you in the night gathering. Thank

you very much. We'll be right back looking for better information. Apsradionews dot com features articles and commentary along with audio from all the top news from around the world. Apsradionews dot com Making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, welcome back and thank you on Rumbles Fromford. Thank you very much. That's very kind, he says. I used to spend my weekday mornings listening to Howard Stern. Then God woke me to what

his show was really about, a tool to defile our Christian culture. Thanks David for being one of the good guys. Well, thank you. I'm glad that you got out. Yeah, when I first started Info Wars, we were on a serious satellite and we got kicked off, but Howard Stern got big raise. And that was back when I was doing a lot of guest hosting. That was like twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen. I did not realize that the CEO of a serious was a tranny, a real groundbreaking tranny

guy as well. So I guess my comments did not go down well with him. After years of denial, Hunter Biden finally acknowledged that Joe was the big guy and the five million dollar China deal. Wow. Who So, I guess can we trust this now? We all knew it all the way along this bowl face denial. But now the people who got egg on their face with the media who defended him over this stuff. And then we have a lot of Trump fans in Trump media who are still in denial about their

big guy. And one of the worst of these is Wayne Allen Root. I could not believe this headline when I saw it, absolutely insane at the Gateway Pundit headline is do you believe in miracles? Something supernatural is happening with President Trump. We are all witnessing the Trump miracle. Wow wow. And they say it's not idolatry. I don't have that clip. I need to keep it on the board here all the time of the the tink commitments and

the people created a great committed a great sin. Yeah, that's what really needs to be there. But he says, you know, when we live in a negative, cynical world. You know, we should just trust all these politicians, especially if they got anar behind their name. Don't be cynical about this. Yeah, I get people are telling me this before January six, just leave Trump alone. And then after January six, especially after Biden got sworn in, just leave Trump alone. USA. He's not going away,

He's coming back. And these people are quuring on prophets and all the rest of this stuff, or telling us that he's still president and he's going to be coming back. There was still at that point in time saying, you know, he really is the true president and I've been told this by God, and he's going to be reinstalled in a couple of months and all the rest of this stuff. It's like you people are have absolutely no shame, but you're bringing shame on the name of Christ. You really are,

you know, frauds like that. He says, a few of us really believe in miracles, and even few of us believe a miracle is happening, even when it is happening right in front of us. But miracles happen all the time. You just have to be open to seeing and believing in miracles. I believe a miracle sent directly by God is happening right in front of us right now, and you have to open your eyes. Trump is that

miracle, says Wayne Allen Rude. Blasphemous, blind and just amazing. Yes, sometimes he's crude and rude, you know, but he is the suffering Messiah. He doesn't call him the suffering Massigh, but that's what he's predictedly putting here. He's had so many indictments and trials, says Wayne Allen Rude. He faces over seven hundred years in prison. If only, if only, he should be worried. If you want to talk about a miracle, pray for a miracle, Pray that God changes Trump's heart, because he faces

an eternity is something worse than prison. He is painted as Hitler and as KKK. Virtually everyone in power is against him, from the deep Swamp to the deep State, to the military industrial complex, all these organizations that he was over and in charge of for four years. He was king of all that. This guy was king of Mordor for four years, and he didn't reduce the size of the More Door Army at all more power. It's just amazing to me to look at all of this. Yeah, he ruled all

this stuff for four years. But they're all against him. They're all against him because it is a gang of It is a gang and it is a game of thrones, and so these people all want to be the one, and they don't like the fact that he wants to be the one. You know, he wants to be a part of the club. But it's not just that he wants to be a part of the club. He must be the one they all vow to they must all kiss his ring, and they're not into doing that. That is a thing that really bothers them. But

he did everything that they wanted. He did everything that they always wanted. He did everything they always said they wanted. And we knew that, and we were told, oh, he's just doing forty chess. I know it looks like he sold us out. I know that he's doing everything that the World Economic Form and the World Health Organized and the UN always said they wanted. And I know that he's doing what they practiced for twenty years. But Alex said, it's just for d chs. He told his audience privately,

he knew otherwise, it's what they always wanted. It was betrayal. But Wayne Allen Root says, foreign governments are so desperate to stop him. Global organizations like the World Economic Forum and WHU, and you know they got exactly what they wanted. NATO as well. Yeah, you look at it, look at how that was orchestrated. You know, Biden is the noisy little horn out there talking about how he's going to wants to defund NATO, and you know these other people, they you know, they've got it. They're

not even doing their two percent job. They need to do their two percent job. Did he defund NATO? No, but in the mind of people like Wayne Allen Root who listened to Wayne Allen Root and other people like that, in their mind, he did it, or he will do it if he becomes president again. Instead, what he did was he got the NATO states to up their anti in preparation for what Biden did in Ukraine. And Trump didn't stop the civil war that was going on in Ukraine that began under

Obama and continued throughout his four years. It was four years of it was four years ago, well, three years of Obama, four years of Trump and another year of Biden before putin evaded of a civil war. None of them wanted to stop it. But Wayne Allen Root says, something supernatural is happening. Yes, yes, I believe so as well. I believe it is a strong delusion. And I'm serious about that, a strong delusion that's

being pushed out there. Some people willingly ignorant, willingly deluded their being deceased by a lot of false prophets and a lot of false opinion. People like Wayne Allen Ruot, who knows better. Wayne Allen Root was one of these people out there coaching Trump says, stop talking about the vaccine. We know how bad it is, and they know how bad it is. Please don't talk about that. You distance yourself from it. Because Trump just kept talking

about his program of death. Now he'd put that it's just the greatest thing to him because he did it in his mind. So he says, I don't think Trump can be stopped. He's touched by God, he's superhuman, he has supernatural support about him. I don't think anyone can stop him. In my lifetime. I've never seen a human being on earth surrounded by this supernatural force. Trump doesn't even age. He looks the same as eight years Ago. All this, says Wayne Allen. Rooton, Well, you're starting

to conviss me, Wayne, that he's an antichrist. Look Satan has been given power to turn and over earthly kingdoms to whoever he wishes. He promised that to Christ. If that wasn't real, that wouldn't have been a temptation, right, So you think he hasn't even aged, Well you should see the Dorian Gray portrait there at Moral Lago, or I should say, Maga Lago. Do you believe in miracles? Says Wayne Allen? This is the He just keeps going. It's a miracles of miracles, don't I should have

counted how many times in this article? This shill, this deceiver, this liar. Wayne Allen uses the term miracle. Do you believe in miracles? It's time to start believing what is happening is supernatural. Everyone is starting to see it. Everyone is starting to believe the signs are there. Trump is quote the chosen One. Okay, it's a messiah, that's what he's saying. So I says blasphemy. Trump is sent by God, Trump is blessed

by God. Well, Trump is sent by God as a curse. I think in a judgment on this idolatrous, corrupt nation that is so focused on wealth and comfort and on themselves. Yeah, this is a supernatural world that we live in, quite frankly. And then you have on the other side, we have Mika Brazinski. His father is a big new Brazinski was the

brainchild of the Trilateral Commission. And you know, he wrote his book and as a matter of fact, back in the nineteen seventies, in his book Between Two Ages, he talked about the coming technocratic Age, that's the way he referred to it, where they the elites would know everything about us and be able to predict what we were going to do before we even knew what we were going to do. He had been planning this stuff for a long time. Yeah, he did that fifty years ago. They liked what he

did in terms of the Trilateral Commission. Create three blocks that are unified, strongly unified, and we do it, you know with economics, just like the World Economic Forum. Right, We're going to do it not through conquest, but we do it through the love of money. And so we create these three different groups and then we consolidate those three groups into one world government. They liked that so much that they made him president during the Carter administration.

He was the guy who ran the Carter administration, just like Kissinger ran Nixon. And now his daughter, Meeka Brazinski's got her her program. And Rodreyer retweeted this and he says, if you don't hate white country people, you might be a fascist. And this is what National Television Network aired. And here it is. Let's see, let me find it here. Here it is joining us now Professor of political science at the University of Maryland,

Baltimore, Tom Shaller and journalist and opinion writer Paul Waldman. Their new book out tomorrow is entitled White Yes Today. Well rage the threat you can get your American democracy. And Tom will start with you, White world people are bad voters, a threat to democracy. At this point, you would think, as we pointed out looking at Joe Biden's background and Donald Trump's, that

the opposite would be true. I mean, we lay out the four fold interconnected threat that white world voters post of the country first of all, and we show thirty polls in national studies to demonstrate this. So we provide the receipts in chapter six. They are the most racist, xenophobic anti immigrant and anti gay geodemographic group in the country. Second, they're the most conspiracist group QAnon support and subscribers, even more so than you. Iihilism, COVID denihalism,

and scientific skepticism, Obama birtherism. Yeah, you don't believe the mcguffins croduct sentiments. They don't believe in an independent press, free speech. They're most likely to say the president should be able to act unilaterally without any checks from Congress or the Core, but Biden does. They're also the most strongly white nationalists and white Christian nationalists. And fourth, they are most likely to

excuse or justify violence as an acceptable alternative to peaceful public distance. So you mentioned a lot of negative factors about this demographic of stereotypes. Yeah, all it is is just a bunch of hate and stereotypes and bias from these people. They don't believe in an independent press. Well, yes we do, free speech, Yes we do. We even want it on social media. Unlike you, who know better than us and are going to tell us what

we can and cannot say. You're going to tell us. So you say that we are anti scientific, and yet you won't show your data, whether we're talking about climate or we're talking about COVID. He says they think that the president should be backed unilaterally without checks from the courts. Well, first of all, who checks the courts? That's what I was just saying. And it's not only the courts, but as many other ways that we should

have checks and balances, isn't it. Should we have checks and balances against the federal government with the state government. Should we have checks and balances against the federal government with the people. Should we have checks and balances against the president not just with courts, but with Congress and vice versa. Right, So the problem is is that you talk about a president who should be acting in laterally. Do they have a problem with Biden who has just decided that

he's going to ignore the courts about the student loan thing. You know, he came up with an idea that, hey, you know, I think the demographic that's most likely to support me is going to be a liberal college educated people who now they went through and they got a lot of debt, and they got a degree that's not really paying much for them. They want to get free of that debt. Those people are more likely to vote for

me, and he's right. They are. So he decided that he would take away their loans that they foolishly incurred for a degree of absolutely no value. But he's going to take that away to buy their vote. They took it to it was challenged to the Supreme Court. Supreme Court said you can't do that. He just come out and said, I don't care whether Supreme

Court says, I'm going to do it anyway. They don't have a problem when their guy acts unilaterally as a dictator, as he has throughout all of this, whether you're talking about vaccine mandates, whether you're talking about bribery and blackmail over vaccines, or whether you're talking about trying to buy voters with student

loan forgiveness. These people are absolute hypocrites and hateful race baiters. So what they're describing in some of these cases when they start talking about the QAnon people, what they're describing is the reckless rhetoric of some demagogues like Steve Bannon,

like Jack the Soviet, like Michael Flynn. They were just there and see pac talking about how, yeah, it's going to be a revolution and there's going to be this and we're not taking this anymore, and all this other kind of stuff hyping up a small minority, and I mean a small minority. Nobody even went to Seapac. Maybe they were smart enough to say, I don't want to have my picture taken with some idiot, some con man, some convicted con man like Steve Bennon, you know, throwing out insinuations

about civil war and about violence to his opponents. What a bunch of idiots. But he's doing it to his own people, just as Trump and Alex Jones did it to them back in twenty twenty. That's what he's doing. The Sea pack stuff, this Reawaken America tour stuff, Stay away from that. These people want to get you in trouble. You think that they're on your side, they're on the side of the establishment. You look at Michael Flynn, you look at Steve Manning, you look at Jack pasoviet. These

are all people who came from the inside. Pasovieac and Flynn were part of intelligence, the right wing intelligence, a see, and they're setting up people and they're also trying to push the civil war. And so it was Steve Bannon. Steve Bannon, somebody who's who is hiding out on the yacht of a Chinese communist billionaire in exile, somebody who was convicted for scamming people who wanted a border wall that Trump was not building. And then it is not

in prison right now because Trump gave him a pardon. But Trump won't pardon the January sixth ers. Trump won't pardon Julian Asnagh, but he'll pardon Steve Man. And why because Steve Bannon is a part of these Judas goats, the Judist goat movement, and so you know what is going on with this

whole idea of white rural rage. The name of their book, as this article on the Daily Yonder planted out, and they did a great job because it's not just a rebuttal of the ignorance, the bias, the racism, and the hate of people like Mika Brazinski and these authors who wrote White Rural Rage. But he actually offers a solution to all of this stuff. They

we ought to all pay attention to. He says, you know, as you look at as you just saw it right there, they're regurgitating every rural stereotype that you can imagine by people who hate people who live in the country and then he gives an interesting example. But before that he talks about what the real problem is, and it's a real problem, not just with people in rural areas, it's a real problem with people in urban areas as well,

he says. In his two thousand book Bowling Alone, sociologist Robert Putnam observed that America fraternized. Americans fraternized much less today than in the past, because of the Internet, because of social media, because of smartphones. These are all amplified, a phenomenon leading to what writer Derek Thompson calls quote a isis of social fitness, which has spawned a friendship recession, which is just to say that we're all isolated. And he says there's a real life socializing

for men has plummeted. Typically don't have friends, they don't socialize with anybody. And so he gives an example as to how to fix this, and he talks about a guy who was a very very liberal member of Congress. His name was Carl Albert back in nineteen sixty eight, and for historical context, nineteen sixty eight was really the height of people pushing back against lbj's conduct of the Vietnam War. People didn't like that, especially in the Democrat Party.

You had riots in Chicago pushing back against that. You had LBJ eventually resigning and not resigning but saying that he's not going to run for reelection, and so then they put mc governor in against Nixon. But everybody was very upset with what was happening in the country, very discontented, and LBJ did not run for reelection. And so Carl Albert was really kind of the number

two guy in Congress. He had been there for twenty two years, but he was still relatively young, and the guy who was the Speaker of the House was not really able to do much, and so this was the guy who was really doing pretty much everything. And he was very very liberal. He wasn't just liberal, he was very liberal. His problem was is that he was that had expanded his district, this congressional district, and now it

included a lot of conservative people in rural areas. So it was much larger, and it included a lot of people that were not going to relate to him. And as he said, he was really stretched out with a lot of you know, political work, essentially being the functioning Speaker of the House at the time, and he was working so hard that he had a heart attack and he had to take some time off, and he's looking at it. It's like I'm gonna I'm going to lose the election, and so what

do I do with all of this? He says, right, he says, he goes to Ghost's congressional district and he said, you know, again, Vietnam was a big issue. There were riots that were going on. Everybody was unhappy with the Democrats, and he said, he didn't plaster the airways with commercials. Instead, what he decided to do, and he was a majority of leader, so he's a number two guy, but effectively he's

like the speaker of the house. Instead, what he did was he got into his car and he started driving around this rural district without any staff and without really any preparation. He spent five days visiting twenty seven towns to meet the voters. And in these towns, Albert would amble into gas stations and grocery stores. He would introduce himself to anyone and everyone. He took notes

of what people said, he actually listened to them. There was plenty of grumbling about the riots, but over five days he encountered only one real redneck, he said on the race question. Arriving at mccurtin, Oklahoma at seven pm, the local gas station, which doubled as the town grocery, was the only open business. He introduced himself to the owner, which resulted in a phone call to the mayor that led to an impromptu community meeting at a

closed department store that lasted until ten pm. Stops at local newspapers and banks resulted in earfolds about the riots that were going on, but Albert knew that it was better to have constituents vent their spleen than to ruminate in silence. Spontaneous visits to a store led to speare of the moment, invites to rotary clubs that resulted in unplanned radio interviews, which spawned unexpected offers to speak at

school assemblies. Word spread. Oklahomas liked that their congressmen shook their hand and asked for their thoughts, and five days after the road trip commenced, Albert, the world class worry wart, concluded, I feel like we will have no trouble in these communities. And throughout the summer he continued to travel around his district and he district, and he made new friends, and then he won reelection, this liberal one reelection of very conservative district with sixty eight percent

of the vote. And so you contrast that to what these guys are doing and what Mika Brazinski is doing. Again, what they are doing is simply reducing everybody to a stereotype. As he says, rather than listen, rather than try to understand the complicated, three dimensional rural Americans, they just stereotyped them willing to reach across the divide, Shaller and Waldman gorge themselves on negative, nihilistic stereotypes. They regurgitate every stereotype that they have seen in their view.

Rule whites vote Republican only to see their economic straits devolve. Angered at this turnabout, they flocked to Donald Trump. And you, by the way, he says, Look, they always vote Republican, and so the Republicans take them for granted. The same thing happens to urban blacks that happens to rural whites. The urban blacks will always vote for the Democrats, who never do anything for them, and the rural whites always vote for the Republicans who

never do anything for them. Why because whether you're talking about Republicans or Democrats. They're they're serving themselves, not you. They don't even bother to listen to you. They're just like Mika Brazenski and these other people. They talk at you, and they don't share your concerns, and they don't share the burden of what these laws that are being passed are really about. And so he says, and here, it's true that sixty five percent of rural Americans

voted for Trump in twenty twenty. But it's also true that the Electoral College and the US Senate give rural Americans outsized political power. No, that's not true. That is not true. As a matter of fact, it's just the opposite. And I've pointed this out through multiple election cycles. You have in each state, you're always concerned about the big urban centers outweighing everything else

is there. That's particularly true for example, in Virginia. In Virginia, you have the suburbs of Washington, d C. You have the Norfolk area, which is a big military naval base that is there. And these are people who are not Virginians. They're not rural. They don't really think about Virginia. They are more government focused in their orientation and don't really care,

don't have connections to the state like the people in the rural areas. And you see this state after state in Texas, for example, it was being pushed and pulled around by the big cities in many cases, but especially in places like Virginia. Here in Tennessee, Nashville, Memphis are pulling around now right now, they're not big enough to have that much clout, but there's an awful lot of money, more so than people in Nashville, and they

have their way with the Tennessee Governor Lee. And you can see this and just no more than I have been here looking at that. And so what happens is always the fact that you have these population centers that can swamp everything else. I've talked about this in terms of the county that we lived in North Carolina. We moved to a rural county and it had been governed by people elected by the county was governed by districts, and so you'd vote within

a particular district for who was going to be on the county commission. And then you had a bunch of people that started coming in from neighboring Chapel Hill where the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill is where they had the guy who did the gain a function experiment, garbage with Fauci. But you had all these people who had a lot of money and they started coming in on the north side of the county and they wanted to change everything and they wanted to

rule the county. And the way that they did it was they went from electing people in jurisdiction in different districts to having the county elections be at large, so you get a slate of people that they ran that everybody in the county voted for, because see prior to that, they could only select the people that were in their area. And that's why you have the electoral college. It basically is a firewall against a few large cities running the country.

If you don't have that firewall of the electoral college, if you don't have the firewall. And we need to give more power to the Senate in terms of the state selection of it by repealing that constitutional amendment that had senators elected at large, they should be appointed by the state as representative of state power. That would be an improvement. It was the wrong way to go with I think it's the seventeenth Amendment. But again, you know that is what

he's saying is not true. It isn't that the rural voters have an outsized representation of anything. It's the other way around. He said. The vast majority of Trump's seventy four million votes came from suburban and urban voters, but he said fewer than one in five Americans live in rural environs, and so

they do not have outsized representation. He says, yes, Trump is a demagogue and a charlatan, and it is true that right wing media spreads conspiracy theories and lies, but rural Americans are not budding authoritarians who represent the enemy within. They vote GOP because Democrats have ignored them for a generation. I would say no, because they've been attacked by Democrats. I would be I wouldn't have a problem if Democrats would ignore me. I wish they would.

Instead, they seek us out and they attack us. They won't leave us alone. And so he says, hug Seth is correct in thinking that Democrats can win rural Wisconsin again, but they'll need to try well. He said, they don't need to look any further than the example that Carl Albert gave them. So, you know, I think that is interesting, But I think that the reality is that we can certainly see the bias the hatred of

Miko Brazinski of the left, and we know that they're the ones who are building this into Gemini. So one last thing before we take a break, and that is in Florida, DeSantis has signed a law to release records that could explain why Jeffrey Epstein got minimal charges. Well, it's going to be interesting, perhaps who knows, because alex Acosta, Trump's picked for labor, as I pointed out the other day, very very tied up in all of this. Yeah, it is kind of interesting to look at these people that

Trump picked. Alex Azar who was top lobbyist for Pfizer and I'm sorry, not for Pfiser, for Eli Lilly, who got his start with the anthracts attack in two thousand and one and moved up through the bioweapon biosecurity industry, but was right there at the very beginning and was training for all that stuff. He did such a great job for them, and they hired him just

a couple of weeks before nine to eleven. Then immediately he gets put on the anthracs attack and then he gets that, he gets moved up to deputy HHS. Then he becomes a lobbyist for the big corporation Eli Lily, which is on a path to become the first trillion dollar pharmaceutical company. And as then he becomes CEO of it, and they triple the price of things like insulin drugs. You know, they extended their patents. They tripled the price,

very exploitative. And then when Trump is bought out by the pharmaceutical companies, when he uses RFK Junior to bump his price up, painting himself as a vaccine skeptic so he could up his price to the pharmaceutical industry. When the pharmaceutical industry paid off Trump, well what they do. They brought back in alex'zar put him in as head of HHS. Nine months before this happened, He's going around to these biosecurity conferences and saying we're going to have a

pandemic of a recipe toy flu thing. And then he was the one at the end of January of twenty twenty who declared the pandemic. What Trump did in March thirteenth was he released money, emergency funds to bribe hospitals and everybody else to do and Governor's especially to do his bidding. So now DeSantis is

looking at the Jeffrey Epstein thing. This is another connection. Alex's are the guy who was the labor secretary for Trump and got forced out when people realized that he was the so called prosecutor who gave a sweetheart deal to Jeffrey Epstein. Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorneys were Dershowitz, big Trump supporter now and Ken Starr,

who's now passed on. But ken Starr was the one who gave a sweetheart deal to Bill Clinton, another Jeffrey Epstein buddy, just like Donald Trump, Desanta signed a bipartisan bill into law that will unearth more Jeffrey Epstein records. The law will allow for the release of records from a two thousand and six Florida grand jury. Prosecutors allowed Epstein's let's say prosecutors that's Alex's r allowed Epstein to plead guilty to only a single prostitution solicitation charge. They allowed him

to escape accountability for raping and sexually abusing girls. Prosecutors decided to bring just a single victim before the grand jury, even though law enforcement had concluded that Epstein sexually abused more than thirty girls. See, this is exactly what ken Start did with Bill Clinton. We're going to make it about Monica Lewinsky and about him committing perjury about a consensual thing. But we're going to call the rest of the people Bimbo's trailer trash, and we're going to forget all the

allegations of sexual violent, sexual assault and rape. And we're also going to forget all the allegations of bribery and economic corruption of the Clintons as well. We'll focus on one thing, and the fact that he said he didn't know

her, and then you know, was proven otherwise. Under this new law that Desantus just signed in Florida, a court could order grand jury evidence to be disclosed if the subject of the grand jury probe is deceased and the investigation related to criminal or sexual activity, and the activity was between the target and the grand jury investigation and a minor looks like this is tailor made for Jeffrey Epstein, just like grabbing nuisances escape clause was tailor made for Panera bread.

All right, we're going to raise the minimum wage for everybody except for Panera bread. Oh, we won't say that. We'll say somebody who makes her own bread and sells it at retail along with everything else that they sell us food. This is what they're doing. Okay, he's dead. It's criminal or sexual activity directed towards miners. Well, that's Jeffrey epste Taylor made for

him that exemption. The Palm Beach Police chief was so outraged that the grand jury only charged Epstein with one count that the FBI got involved, and the FBI later prepared a fifty three page indictment against Epstein, but their probe was undercut by a deal that Epstein's lawyers struck. Who were Epstein's lawyers, Alan Derschwitz ken Starr. They struck with then US District Attorney Alex Acosta, who

became Trump's Department of Labor pick. In the end, Epstein spent just thirteen months in jail, much of it spent on work release, where he hung out in his office. Like I said before, you know, he got the kind of jail time that Otis and the Andy Griffiths show got. You're checking a sleep there and then he go do is you know, let himself in, let himself out. A twenty nineteen Miami Herald investigation brought renewed interest

and attention to the prosecutors deals with Epstein. This led to a public outcry that forced Acosta, who had become Trump's labor secretary, to resign. Federal prosecutors in Manhattan then opened a separate case into Epstein. In January, a federal judge unsealed the names of roughly one hundred and seventy of Epstein's associates, IMiD a separate lawsuit between one of his accusers and his sex trafficking partner, Gallaine Maxwell. So when you and in this, they're also talking to some

of the people who were involved in this and outraged by what happened. Epstein's crimes were first reported to the FBI in nineteen ninety six. What was going on with Trump and Epstein? In nineteen ninety six, they were BFFs. Oh, They're partying together, partying in New York, partying in Palm Beach,

all this stuffy. They had a were really best friends at that time, and the FBI was already looking at him, but it wasn't until the complaint was filed with Palm Beach Police Department in two thousand and five that Epstein came under scrutiny. And as I've said, they were really really good friends until about that time. Just a couple of months after Trump and Epstein got into a spat over a piece of property that went up for sale because the guy died or was so old that he had to get rid of it or

something like that. But they both wanted that piece of property and they had to have it, and they got into a contentious competition for that, and that poisoned their friendship at that point in time. But up to that point in time, for over a decade, they were really really really close friends. Trump was close friends with the Clinton's, with the Epstein, with Epstein

all the rest of the stuff. And as I said, it was kind of curious that just a couple of months after that that somebody anonymously reported Jeffrey Epstein to the police and they kicked this whole thing off. That interesting anyway, he came under scrutiny. Kirshner, who had a reputation for aggressively prosecuting crimes against children, initially said that he didn't know who Epstein was, but he told the police, I'm going to put him behind bars for the rest

of his life. Palm Beach detectives took statements from victims, many of them terrified of Epstein, who told them basically the same story. They were offered money to give a wealthy man massages, massages that then turned into assaults. At his Palm Beach mansion. Epstein hired a team of influential lawyers, among them Alan Derschwitz, Ken Starr, and Roy Black. According to police,

Epstein also hired private investigators who stalked his victims and their families. Soon Kirshner, the prosecutor, began questioning whether Epstein should be charged with any crimes. Most troubling to the police, however, was prosecutors labeling the victims as prostitutes, even though some of them were as young as thirteen. Detective Joe Rickerry

said testify in two thousand and six before the grand jury. He said the prosecutors repeatedly postponed the grand jury, then they rescheduled at the last minute. By this time, some of the young women had moved away or were in

college. The rescheduling would force victims to travel long distances. Miss classes on short notice, but behind the scenes, prosecutors are unsuccessfully trying to get Epstein to plead to lesser charges, and when that failed, Kirshner took the unusual step of impaneling a grand jury, a move that is usually reserved for homicide cases. Rickerry and his police chief, Michael Reichner, were so troubled by what they saw as the state attorney minimizing Epstein's crimes, and they took the

case to the FBI in two thousand and seven. Riccari, who died after a short illness in twenty eighteen, had never given an on the record interview until the Miami Herald approached him about the case in twenty seventeen. Writer also spoke publicly for the first time about the case as part of Miami Herald's Perversion

of Justice this series. The series also include interviews with Epstein's victims, detailed how Epstein his lawyers managed to manipulate prosecutors into giving him an extraordinarily lenient deal that was kept secret from his victims and from their attorneys. He then avoided being in jail for long periods of time by getting an unusual incarcerationary arrangement in which he spent almost all of his waking hours in a luxurious office suite and

downtown Palm Beach. He rarely spent time in jail. He was allowed to have young women visit him at his office as well. After the Miami Herald series, DeSantis had asked the Florida Department of Law Enforcement to investigate the state prosecution as well as Epstein's unusual jail privileges. Then, in twenty twenty one, state investigators said they found no evidence that Kirshner and State Attorney Lana Belolavik, or the Palm Beach sheriff in charge of the jail committed any wrongdoing.

However, they would not let them see the grand jury records, and so that is why this law has been passed. They wanted to get the grand jury records to see what was going on with that. We're gonna take a quick break. We'll be right back looking for better information. Apsradionews dot com features articles and commentary along with audio from all the top news from around the

world. Apsradionews dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Like nine smartphones came on and kids started They stopped living their lives and started watching people live their lives, And so we saw the biggest spike and the highest levels of depression, anxiety, loneliness, and suicidality since records have ever been kept. And it's just continued on and on and on, and then COVID hits ten years later. And the same agencies that knew that are the agencies

that shut down the schools for two years. Who does that? Who takes away the support system for these children? Who takes them away to shut it down? And by the way, when they shut it down, they stopped the mandated reporters from being able to see children that were being abused and sexually molested and in fact sent them home and abandoned them to their abusers with no way to watch. ANNE referrals drop fifty to sixty percent. So it's also

Bill Denbeah. They were trying to say they were trying to save kids' lives. Remember, we know a lot of folks who died during this. It was New or Land around each opon. But well, you know what, we're lucky. Maybe we're lucky they didn't because we kept them out of the places that they could be sick. Because no one wants to believe we had an issue. Are you saying no school children died of COVID. I'm saying

it was the safest group. They were the less vulnerable group, and they suffered and will suffer more from the mismanagement of COVID than they will from the exposure to COVID. And that's not an opinion, that's a fact. Well, yeah, they all know that's a fact. As a matter of fact, that was a whole narrative. Don't they remember what the original narrative was. It was all the old people. We got to protect the old people.

As a matter of facts, that was the key signal that this was not some kind of a pandemic or a disease that was going around because it was heavily skewed. It looked exactly like the actual old tables of life expectancy. It was always the old people, with people who were at or above life expectancy, who had two and a half comorbidities. We had two weeks worth of data from Italy. They kept talking about that, Oh, we got to vaccinate the old people. Give it to the old people first.

Remember all that the last people. They gave it to were the kids. They're saying that was to save their lives. No, no, they never even tried to come up with a lying narrative to make that. That wasn't even a part of their lying narrative. Excess deaths, so we pointed out, were because of what was being done by the hospitals to people. It wasn't because there was any pandemic. But you notice how they turned. They were all with him. We talked about this plague of loneliness, this isolation

that had been set there. But then when he talks about how the actions of Trump and Biden made it worse. Oh well, wait a minute. Now we're talking about COVID. These people are my sponsors, right, there's general thing. Oh yeah, this whole thing. They're just you know, kind of setting home and playing with their phone and disconnected from the world.

Well, that's safe for them. But as soon as he starts talking about their sponsors, the pharmaceutical industry, the politicians, and the rest is oh no, no, no, Now, we're not going to allow him to say anything about that. So he says, Then COVID hits ten years later in the same agencies that knew that they're the agency shut down the school for two years. Who does that? Who takes away a support system for these kids? Well, again, this was about their sponsors who are paying their

checks. So she says, they're trying to save kids' lives. No, they weren't. That was never That wasn't the lie, Whippie, you got another lie replacing the other lies. And we've got Fauci now, and I'll get to this in a moment. We've got Vauci saying, well, you know, maybe these mRNA vaccines are not what we need to be doing for a respiratory disease. Huh. Really, well, you know, maybe ventilators aren't what you're supposed to do either, because you never did that either.

You kill people your ventilators to kick off and to prepare the way for your mass murder injections. So he says, now, I'm saying it was the safest group, they were less vulnerable group, and they suffered and will suffer more from the mismanagement of COVID than they will from the exposure to COVID. That's not an opinion, that's a fact. And you heard the audience break into applause. Well, we've had the COVID vaccine mandate has been ruled unlawful

by the Supreme Court by a Supreme court in Australia. This is the Queensland Supreme Court. They had vaccine mandates for police and for ambulance workers. They

declared this to be unlawful. In a landmark Supreme Court ruling this week and decision handed down on Tuesday, the Queensland support Supreme Court found that the Police Commissioner and his direction for I'm sorry woman A Caterina's direction for mandatory COVID vaccination, issued in December of twenty twenty one, was unlawful under the Human Rights Act. Is it interesting how they're all on the same page, the same time frame and everything. They missed it maybe by one or two months,

but they're all doing the same things at the same time. A similar COVID vaccination mandate ordered by the Director of General of Queensland Health at the same time was determined to be of no effect, with the enforcement of both mandates and any related disciplinary actions to be banned. They said in the court decision that the Police Commissioner did not consider the human rights ramification. You know, things like informed consent and stuff like that. Those old fashioned ideas. Excuse me.

However, a human rights lawyer said that there was an ominous caveat about all of this. He said they won because the commissioner did not appropriately consider the human rights advice that she received. However, the court also found that although each of the directions limited the worker's right to full, free and informed consent under Section seventeen of the Human Rights Act, the limit was reasonable in

all of the circumstances. So if the commissioner could approve that she had considered the advice that she received regarding human rights, her workplace vaccination directors would likely have been considered to be lawful even if she ignored those. So what they're saying is you didn't even pay attention when people said, hey, you need

to consider the human rights, which said I don't care. But if she had looked at it and said, well, I've looked at that, and i've considered that, and I'm going to do this anyway because I don't really care what your human rights are, well, then the court would have said, oh, well that's okay. Then this is where we are. This is where throughout Western society, where you're talking about Australia or America, or

Canada, Europe or anything. This is where we are. They really don't care about the principles of human rights, they don't care about informed consent. They feel that they're free to do whatever they wish to us. As a matter of fact, this is about ambulance drivers and police officers, but nurses and doctors are still subject to them and to disciplinary action if they don't get

vaccinated. While the Queensland Police and Ambulance Services are now prohibited from enforcing COVID vaccine mandates, the mandates remain in place for some nurses, midwives and doctors. It's just absolutely amazing to me and embedded in this article as a video. I'm seven months pregnant. A Queensland nurse is fired for refusing a COVID JAB an untested vaccine, even when she is seven months pregnant. Well, you know, Faucci has backed off of the vaccine. Fauci says vaccines are

not a good strategy to control respiratory viruses. Yes, he actually said this. Can you believe it? This guy will say anything, yeah, well, masks are not good and then he says, no, you gotta wear a mask. Now you gotta wear two or three masks and all the rest of the stuff. Social He's changed his position on everything, and now he can read the writing on the wall, and he is pulling back against the vaccines, and he's even talking about the Lablik very why because that gives him

cover. I think that he realizes that people are onto this game. And even though he is very old, none of these people ever think they're going to die. That's why you got people like Mitch McConnell and Dianne Feinstein, Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden and Donald Trump keep running for office into their seventies, into their eighties, and some of them are in good health. Others, even though they're in very very poor health, they continue to run.

And so even though Fauci is getting older, he's still in very good shape. And maybe he's worrying that there could be a jail cell in his future. There certainly should be. So he's going to distance himself now from the vaccines. It's like, well, you know, I got mistakes were made.

You know I've corrected the mistakes now. And so he said that this report going back to twenty twenty three January twenty twenty three, Fauci and two colleagues outlined their concerns in the interplay between respiratory viruses and the human immune system under systemic infections. They claim respiratory viruses primarily replicate in the mucosal linings of the airways, posing unique challenges for vaccine induced immunity. This, of course,

as a writer, is not true. According to their theory of viruses. It replicates in any cell with an H two receptor and the high esticity a virus detected in the lining of the gut. But we'll move on from Fauci's inability to grasp the full scientific literature. Again, he has done a one to eighty degree turn from previous statements and from the public health strategies, the demands, the mandates, the bribe breed, the blackmail, that we

relied on mRNA technology. And so they point out, they said, well, there's three different aspects of this report, and I'll just I won't go into the details of it, but mucosal versus systemic community number two, durability of protection number three, immune imprinting. And so he says, yeah, in all these different areas, it's just maybe it's not a good fit. In multiple areas, he says, it's like, how could you've gotten this wrong? The writer, and this is from popular rationalism, says, pardon

me while I duct tape my head to keep it from exploding. So it concludes an ongoing research and development and vaccine technology is the answer. So you know, even though this didn't work, oh, we got to do more of it. Right. This is always the case. Whenever they do something, they will not admit to a mistake. If they say that the mission failed somehow, well that just means that we need to do more of what I was doing, and we need to have more staff, and on and

on. Meanwhile, a CDC panel is investigating whether the new RSV vaccine made by Pfizer is causing gion brace syndrome. Daily Mail points out, it's rare. It's rare, right, that's their excuse. Well, again, it used to not matter if it was rare. We had nine states outlaw the swine flu vaccine back in the nineteen seventies because of a couple of deaths and

because people were getting gion brace syndrome. That was the problem. With a woman that was interviewed by Mike Wallace, she had gym brace syndrome and it paralyzed her. She was working to get back some limited mobility and to be able to walk with braces and crutches and stuff like that. But you know,

it was very rare, but they still stopped it. And just like we talked about the blowing seven thirty seven max, they had two crashes out of twenty five hundred crashes I think it was it was thousands of crashes, and they want to say that, you know, even though everybody died on these two planes, they didn't just say, well, it was rare. We're going to keep going. I'm thinking maybe it was more than that.

I'm trying to remember that number. But anyway, the inquiry was based on about two dozen cases of guillam beret and people over sixty who got the vaccine, and it was supposedly nine and a half million people who got the vaccine over sixty, or a couple of dozen cases of this. But this is the type of thing that they would have pulled it from the market completely. Now they make an excuse, well it was rare. We'll look at it a little bit more closely, but we're not going to stop anything. It

was higher than expected. Officials are gathering more information to determine whether the vaccines are causing the problem. You know, maybe if we hadn't stopped doing testing of vaccines because of Trump's warp speed stuff, and that that's become another precedent, just like gun control by executive or do we have products without even doing any testing. So now that's become the norm. We are going to whenever this happens, we are going to have to just put up with it.

We don't really care, you know, when you look at what are they gaining? You know, RSV, that's something that's been around for a very very long time. People die from flu, people die from coals, they die from respiratory diseases. But what do they say, rare, rare, And it's more people dying from that than die from measles, for example. But they're very you know, focused on the measles vaccine out of all proportions.

But just think about this. Would you rather take your chances with a temporary cold or flu or RSV or something like that, or would you rather take a chance that you're going to be paralyzed and perhaps permanently paralllened because some of these people are That's where informed consent comes in. You should be able to make that decision, not somebody else. Doctors confirm a vaccine connection after a young Ontario woman is paralyzed following a MODERNA shot. What was their solution?

They offered her euthanasia. We'll kill you. How about that put you out of your misery. Yeah, it was from the vaccine. It was from the Trump shot. We don't really have anything we could do other than kill Youas to kill you, A young mother's life has been turned upside down the wake of receiving her MODERNA trump shot. It was a booster She's thirty seven years old. She had her life turned upside down as a mother. She received the booster shot on January the eleventh, twenty twenty two. She

began experiencing alarming symptoms, culminating in her complete paralysis. Less than two weeks later. Despite the initial skepticism from emergency department staff, an MRII revealed a

significant lesion on her spinal cord. A neurologist documented on an audio recording expressed his belief that the vaccine was a likely cause of her condition, a view that was later confirmed with the diagnosis of transverse mayolitis, a rare inflammatory disorder caused by damage to the spinal cord, documented to be one of the known symptoms of this vaccine, and so their response was to offer her made medical

assistance in dying, and she refused. Her condition has resulted in the loss of her job, her home, and her ability to co parent her son, reducing her to reliance on provincial disability support and the assistance of care workers for her daily needs. A group of Veterans for Freedom set up a send go campaign to raise fund so that she can get a service dog. They said that would not only help her with a daily task, will help to

give her companionship, which she greatly needs. So just mentioned that you can find that article at Gateway Pundit where you can find that link to the donation. Then another woman now she can't have children again. This is another one of these shots. This is somebody who was featured and Senator Ron Johnson who is holding hearings trying to give a voice to the people who've been injured by these Trump shots. And the husband says, somebody needs to make them pay.

Who needs to be punished for this? Who needs to pay for this? Advisor moderna Trump Biden fauci. You think they're going to any of them are going to pay for any of this stuff. So she's thirty six years old, heresident said, she chose a career, got the baby family bug, and now she can't have children because of the vaccine. She cries all the time. She apologizes to me like it's her fault. But it's not her fault, he says. Somebody needs to make them pay. We need

safe guards so that this doesn't happen again. Johnson's forum is titled Federal Health Agencies and the COVID Cartel. What Are They Hiding? Featured a roundtable discussion including twenty two testimonials from scientists, medical doctors, former government officials, and journalists about what they said were problems with the vaccines and government efforts to censor

the dangers. Well, the problem is is that you know they're not only censoring the dangers, but you've got this boasting narcissist Trump who is telling everybody that he saved millions of lives and how this is one of the greatest things ever invented by man and Biden is essentially the same way. That's why I say they got blood on their hands. The people who are conservative journalists who are supporting, and people like Wayne Allen Root telling everybody that Trump is a

miracle, He's a gift from God. You know, He's the suffering servant, God's anointed chosen one. And all the rest of this garbage was telling this miraculous, suffering servant chosen by God. He's telling him. Shut up. Everybody knows your stuff is poison Stop bragging about poisoning everybody. Messiah, Well, you talk about a cult of suicidal kool aid. That's what the people like Wayne Allen rooton, Alex Jones and all the rest of these people.

Oh, it's just sugar water. Take it. Take it. Well, look at what happened to these people, the cover ups, including both the origins of COVID nineteen and China. See, this is part of the problem, this lab lie. If you're in Congress, where are the bills being offered, even by Senator Johnson or by Ram Paul who loved to harangue Fauci over the gain of function stuff, especially in China. Why don't they offer some legislation to shut this thing down. They did shut it down legally

in twenty fourteen. They told Francis Collins, who was Fauci's boss. They told Collins and Fauci, stop it. We've had a lot of accidents, We've had a lot of sick animals released out into the wild. You're going to get people sick with this stuff. We've had accidents where people have been exposed in these labs to highly toxic diseases. Stop it. And then they

continued it. Francis Collins said when he released the research from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill a couple of years after they had told him to stop it, he said, well, and he was criticized by scientists in the industry for doing that. They said, there's no reason to do this. Nothing good can come of any of this stuff. And it's more and it's dangerous. It's not just a waste of money. It's dangerous what you're doing.

They said, well, I made the determination myself that we're going to continue with this. Francis Collins, head of the NIH, head of Fauci, and Fauci decided they didn't really care what Congress said. But see, Congress is not even trying at this point in time, they're not even trying to stop this and that's a big red flag, isn't it when these people keep talking about lab leaks and how dangerous all this stuff is. It just happened in Kenada as well. You had Pollie, the conservative guy I can't

pronounce his name, Pierre Paulaver or something like that. He was out there talking. First thing he talks about are these gain of function labs and everything. These people are laying out, as I said yesterday, they're laying out an alibi for people like Fauci and Trump and Biden. And then they're laying down the expectation that there's going to be some disease X, some major pandemic

and this Enheim it could be real. And we're told by people like Alex Jones and Gateway Pundit and all that that it was real when it came around the first time. They were all saying that this lab league stuff is a dangerous misdirection, it's an alibi, and it's preparing the path for this to be done again. So CDC is telling people sixty five and older to take more COVID booster shots. Less than forty two percent of adults aged sixty five

and above have taken the updated COVID nineteen vaccines. Well, that's good news. People are starting to catch on to these lives. That means that fifty eight percent, almost sixty percent of the people have caught on to these lies. Even Fauci is pulling back and saying, well, maybe that's not the right thing to do, and yet the CDC pushes on. Even Fauci is

pulling back, and yet the CDC says continue. The West Virginia House has now passed a bill to allow religious exemption for students who are the universities are giving them these these vaccine mandates. And so it's uh. And there's a tremendous number of universities that are still mandating these vaccines and still mandating boosters. It's just amazing. And the media is freaking out still about measles in Florida. This headline with ten measle cases in Florida, state health officials failed to

provide information. Oh ten cases, Well, you know, quite frankly, that's more than they had when they started declaring a global pandemic, isn't it. They didn't have that many cases when alex Azar declared a pandemic and started

this whole ball rolling. They didn't have that. They didn't have anybody dying when Trump did his March Friday, the thirteenth executive order, So they're really on them about measles and so Ladipoe, the Surgeon General of Florida Desantus's Pick, was telling parents at Manite Bay and Weston that the decision whether to keep their children home was up to them. Can you imagine that? How in the world could you have a government official telling people telling parents that they can

have an informed decision about what their children do. Again, this is no big deal, but they're freaking out. Florida health officials have not been forthcoming with information about the diseases spread. Guess what somebody needs to tell this bed wedding press that nobody has died. They need to tell them that there's many of us who are alive whose parents used to send us for sleepovers so we could get done with these childhood diseases when they were going around and we got

lifetime immunity from him. So let me just finish up with this. How modern medicine dehumanizes this by doctor David Bell. He said a close friend died recently of a rare and aggressive cancer from diagnosis. He had several months of generally positive life foo a difficult time. He maintained a sense of humor, a rational view of the world, and loyalty to friends. He'd always been good at seeing things that others didn't and so forth. But he says his

cancer was treated in the modern way. So there was a team that specialized in radiating the cancer to shrink it. Another group specialized in poisoning cancer cells, he said. But somewhere nobody ever was tasked with giving him any dietary advice that seemed to fall through the cracks. Nobody's going to change anything about that. Don't really care about what you eat, right, he said.

But to understand my or institutional palliative care, it is best to understand what happened next after he's put into things got worse, and they put him into palliative care, he said. Matt was placed in a room on the main corridor near the nurse's desk. The door was left ajar so that he could be observed. This room was painted gray. It had no windows, It had no pictures on the wall. It had a couple of chairs and some fixtures for oxygen, a basin, an antiseptic dispenser and a cupboard. Day

and night became irrelevant, as in any windowless cell. After some days, Matt was said to be nonresponsive and may not be here for long, which surprised us, as he had been quite stable and well oriented shortly before when friends visited. He could talk, and he could interact, and he appreciated visitors and he thanked them for coming. But later he would be reported to have lapsed into unresponsiveness again, and this was confusing to those of us who

knew him. He said, over a momentultiple visits, a nurse came in only with a syringe to inject what turned out to be his palliative care morphine and medazlam. I'm starting to see this medaslam a lot, right. This was the thing that Matt Hancock, this bureaucrat who had absolutely no medical experience

whatsoever, was pushing out to people hastening their death. They were talking about using it as murder in the UK, and he upped it to many, many times, what was it, six or eight times what they had been consuming. I grabbed this stuff so they could hasten people's deaths. Medazlam, he said, Morphine dulls the pain and the mind, and it suppresses breathing.

Medazlam reduces the ability to respond, so the recipient stops crying out for help when he wets himself or is embarrassed about being naked or his thirsty. He said. And when we went to see him, they had him just laying there on the bed naked. Didn't even bother to put any covers on it, he said. When staff were requested to withhold the midazlam, Matt was able to converse with others, to express his needs and to answer questions.

Is this perhaps why Matt Hancock and the NHS in the UK. Is that perhaps why they started with this massive amount of midaslon, another way to keep people from complaining, to keep people from asking for help, just like they took the families away so they couldn't do anything about it. Yeah, I think so. Loan individuals seldom act in the systematically abusive and callous way toward a stranger. When they do, we call them sociopaths or even psychopaths.

But he says, an institution that is made up of individuals can do this. However, very we drown the call of conscience and empathy and group think and routines. Just think of the Milgrim experiment for example. Oh well, people in authority are telling me I need to do this. It's just the way the machine works. Whether it's trainloads of people from the ghetto, or whether it's corralled refugees or forgotten faces locked in a nursing home, we

receive permission to devalue others, not realizing that they are ourselves. In Western medicine, it has allowed us to separate the tumor from the person, and then, where necessary, we kill the person before death, making it all so much less traumatic or intrusive on our own routines, so he says, thanks to neighbors and friends who cared. Matt was returned home on a stretcher

with visits by a good community health team and support from friends. The medaslam and the morphine, it turned out, had mainly served to help the institution to function, preventing Matt from interrupting their routine, preventing them from having to have human contact with him. Just drug him up so we don't have to worry about it at home. He had human contact, He had music, he had sunlight through a window, he had conversation that was natural rather than

an imposition. This might be a revelation to some people, especially in this age and where we shut the elderly or the dying away from their family. And not just in this age, but in this pandemic especially. You just labeled somebody as COVID and they're gone, he said. Matt died a few days at home. But when he died, he was not naked to passerbys in a gray, windowless room on a urine soaked plasticized sheet. But he was at home, surrounded by friends. He was still a person, a

wonderful one, despite all that progress could achieve. Yeah, that's what we call medical progress. Right. Well, I said that was going to be last thing. I've got one more thing I want to cover here, and that is in Tennessee, there is a state bill that has been introduced to label foods if they have a vaccine in them. And this was laughed off when it was introduced by a Republican representative. It was laughed off by a Democrat. You know, essentially, I, oh, you're some kind of

a paranoid conspiracy theorist. You think they're putting vaccines in the food. Well, they've been talking about this for since twenty twenty one. University of California said we can put vaccines in the food. Known as Tennessee House Bill eighteen ninety four, it is known as the Lettuce Bill, a short one page legislature that defines food that contains a vaccine or vaccine material as a drug for the purposes of the Tennessee Food and Drugs Cosmetic Act. Now, this is

very interesting. Again, is very much like what we've just seen happening with the geoengineering disclosure both in New Hampshire and also another bill here in Tennessee where they said, if you're going to be spraying stuff into the atmosphere or in water or anything, you better let us know. And if you don't and we find out about it, we're going to give you some really heavy fines.

And so they define vaccine or vaccine material meaning a substance intended for use in humans to stimulate the production of antibodies and to provide immunity against disease, prepared from the causative agent of the disease, its products, or asynthetic substitute that would be the mRNA type right treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease that is authorized or approved by the United States Food and Drug Association.

During the hearing, the Republican who introduced this, his name is Sepechy. I think see picky. I'm not sure how he pronounced that. He said. What I'm saying here is that there's no law deeming those that when you go into a grocery store, you should know as a consumer that this head of lettuce is ahead of lettuce, and the head of lettuce right next to it could contain a vaccine in it. And what we're saying is, if it does have the vaccine in it, make sure it's listed as a

pharmaceutical so that people can get the proper dosage. That's all he's asking for. And that's why I said this is interesting. From another number of standpoints, you're starting to get bills introduced. These people are laughing at all. Oh, that's a bunch of conspiracy theory. But people know stuff is being sprayed in the atmosphere. People know that the food is being deliberately contaminated. They've been bragging about this. University has been bragging about it. Gates has

been bragging about it. You argue that researchers at the University of California. You see, Davis and others have perfected the ability of genetically engineering foods to have things such as mRNA and them, and therefore prompted him to introduce the bill to get ahead of this before such food enters the market. The committee chairman John Ray Clemens of Nashville found this to be humorous. Well, I don't think that's allowed under state law presently. Are we going to have Walgreens

pharmacists with the refrigerator section? I mean, how is this thing going to play out? Pretending to be stupid? Or maybe he really is just stupid, right, Maybe he's just ignorant and uninformed. Maybe he's not stupid, Maybe he just doesn't read much the sycopy Sippicky did. He said, this is more of a consumer protection bill. It's mates to make sure that you're going to buy tomatoes if there's a polio vaccine in there, that you're aware

of what you're buying is got a polio vaccine in it? He said. The problem is here is that it's not treated as a pharmaceutical. He says, the size and the difference, for example, between you and me. He said, We're going to put a vaccine in a tomato. How many tomato is do I have to eat to get the proper dosage versus how many tomatoes you have to eat? If you eat too many, you get an overdose. This, folks, is the same argument I've made for years about

fluoride. Even before we talk about whether or not the vaccine is safe and effective, Before we even talk about whether not fluoride is safe and effective, the issue is dosage. How are you going to correct the dosage if you put it in food? How are you going to correct the dosage if you put the fluoride in water? Well, quite frankly, there isn't any medical

explanation for that. The only way that you can explain that is that they're trying to do harm to people because they're either going to not give you a sufficient dosage to handle whatever this is supposed to fix, or they're going to give you too much, which in itself is very definition of a poison.

During all of this COVID vaccine stuff, a lot of people are pointing out, I don't know if it was Australia or New Zealand, the farmmaceutical government agencies actually called poisons, and it's kind of a you know, going back to you know, potions and stuff like that. But any pharmaceutical drug is a poison if you get too much of it. And so how do you

control the dosage? He says, if you eat too little like we had in the cattle industry with a dosing our cattle properly, the hornflies were developing an immunity to it. If we don't have the proper dosage of the vaccine, it could lead to the efficacy of that drug not working anymore. So you don't even have to talk about the harm that's being done. You don't even talked about the safety of it. And got about overdose. You say, well, what if we underdose, Well, then it's not going to

be effective. Right, And so this has been around since twenty twenty one, three years ago. We'll be right back. Whether you're feeling like the blue where or blue Grass ATS Radio has you covered, check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APS radio dot com. In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to the

David Knight Show. Well, let me take some of the emails we've had recently, and I even have one that was Karen's this morning as I was reading and it was about ask me anything, and they didn't get a chance to ask me anything. So I've got an answer. Maybe for Matt. I don't know. I haven't read it yet. We printed it out, but anyway, this is from Chris. He says, I take a look at what is happened in Ukraine, the Democrats, how they're funding their programs.

Actually I talked about this one yesterday, so let me skip this. It was we were talking about Letitia James and how she was living very large a life of luxury, which typically is what happens with these people. But again marking some of these luxurious life you know, the life of the rich and political. I guess where's Archibald Leech or the guy that had lifestyles of

the rich and famous. But at the same time she's doing all of that she has and I don't think I got to through this talking about this. She goes to war against JBS Foods, a big producer of beef, because they got to stop meat. Right. She is doing everything she can to endear herself to the people who are pushing these agendas. The globalist agendas so

that she can run for higher office. She said. The beef industry is one of the largest contributors to climate change, and they have falsely advertised their commitment to sustainability and endangered our planet. Well, maybe they shouldn't have bragged about how they were following ESG or some of these other things. Just push back against CO two. Don't try to talk about how you're cutting your missions.

Her office is filed a lawsuit did it wednesday against JBS USA, a division of the Brazilian meat packing giant, the world's largest producer of beef products, because they've got, by hook or by crook, stop us from being able to eat meat. JBS USA has claimed that it will achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions by twenty four despite documented plans to increase production therefore increase its carbon footprint, said Latsia James. Go after Trump, go after the NRA,

go after meat and all the rest of this stuff. And what is she doing on the basis of well, the basis of fraud. And yet when you look at her expenses, yeah, office expenses at a luxury hotel. You mark that office office expenses. So the attorney General's Office noted that animal agriculture accounts for nearly fifteen percent of annual global greenhouse gas emissions. We'll just tell her to eat cake, tell her we don't really care about your

co two fantasies. Let's stop playing this game. But again, they made themselves culpable because they bragged about their ESG. And so she called it green washing. Well, everything in all of this climate stuff is ultimately green washing. And then we had someone from South Carolina send this to me. He said, this story about a woman voting in South Carolina, even though she

fell and broke her hip at the voting station. They did an article showing how she was so adamant that she needed to vote for Trump that she got them to bring out the and I've got a picture of it here somewhere. Yeah, here we are. They got her them to bring out the voting machine so she could vote with her broken hip laying on the sidewalk. There she is, And so they did a Facebook thing about it. This is

dedication. She broke her hip and refused to let the ambulance take her away until they brought her the handicap ballot machine to vote on Wow hashtag Trump twenty twenty four. It's a miracle, miracle. We must Where's Trump when you need him? I'm sure that he could hear if he showed up. So I just got to say that if this had happened to her in twenty twenty, if you wanted to go vote for Trump in twenty twenty, and she fell and broke a hip in twenty twenty, do you think they would have

given her medical care. They would have taken her to the hospital if they didn't smother her to death with one of the Trump ventilators. They would have told her, sorry, we don't have a bed. We got to save all the beds in case somebody comes down with COVID. I'm serious, you know that was what was happening, people being denied and turned away medical care

because we got the viruses everywhere. We got to well, I know the beds are empty right now, but any moment now they could all be filled up, and we got to keep you away from getting any care with your broken hip. Got to keep all these beds open just in case. But people commented on this Facebook post said a liberal would not have had the fortitude to vote after a broken hip. Only God fearing conservative, and of course it put God's name in lower case. No, don't bet on it.

Let me tell you something, Democrats are even more dedicated. Democrats a broken hip. Democrats vote after they die. That's how dedicated they are. Another one says, I wish Trump could see this. She needs a phone call from him. A true patriot. I hope she's doing well. All the rest of this stuff, it's just amazing to me. But again, none of that surpasses what I saw from Wayne Allen Root a miracle. God's chosen

one. He's right there. And then this is a follow up to the story that I had about Bill Gates releasing these genetically modified mosquitoes in various places in the you know, to stop dingy fever and the rate of dingy fever going up by four hundred percent. And so Jason says, dingy fever has a very nasty side effect a second and in five years after the infection causes a side constorm that kills. If Bill Gates is releasing mosquitoes that cause dingay

fever, this is huge. Well yeah, I mean, the bottom line is is that even if you stop and think about this, let's say that this is a legitimate approach to try to a long term approach. We're going to release sterilized mosquitoes that we'll breed with other mosquitoes and then nothing will happen, and so we will over the long term, reduce the population, you know, like they've done with us humans. You know, that's the strategy.

Will sterilize male or female, are both, and gradually reduce the population. Track the remaining people, kill a lot of them, survey and track everybody else until we've got complete control. Well, if that was the case, we're going to reduce the population gradually by doing this. Even though you sterilize these mosquitos, you still release them out into the wild and they're still

going to be able to transmit ding gay fever. So it's not rocket science to know that if you release you know, tens or hundreds of millions of mosquitoes, that dingay fever is going to go up. That's a given. It's not even a question that something like that is going to happen. So, yeah, he is culpable in all of this because it's a bone headed scheme. These mosquitoes that are alive but sterile are still going to be spreading

DN gay fever. Just because they can't reproduce doesn't mean they can't reproduce DN gay fever, which is what these things always do. I mentioned this briefly. This is from a listener who wanted to send me an email because I talked to I'd had a quote about C. S. Lewis. I said, I really enjoy C. S. Lewis's take on a lot of issues.

He said, just a quick note on C. S. Lewis, I'll read this to you, and he says that like many new converts in intellectually oriented churches today, I was quickly introduced to C. S. Lewis. I read many of his books, early on nineteen eighty to nineteen ninety of My New Life in Christ. That wasn't until about two thousand and six I noticed that sprinkled amongst his brilliant sound truth bites were alarming lies and some dangerous conclusions. He says he's kind of a type of Alex Jones in the

sense of lies being mixed with truth. Well, let me just say this. You know the difference, says, you know, we all have lies mixed with truth, whether we realize it or not. We all, even if we're trying our best to tell the truth. We may get stuff wrong. That's why I say we don't trust anybody. You know, if if I say something, you should check me right. And when it comes to religion, the standard is not what David says. It's what does a Bible say? And that's not what C. S. Lewis says or J.

R. Tolkien or GK. Chesterton or whatever. It's what what does the Bible say? And so the differences whether you knowingly lie to somebody, that's that's what Alex was doing. Knowingly lying to somebody for fame and for fortune. That's a very different thing than what C. S. Lewis did. And I disagree with CS Lewis on some things, and I said the other day I disagree with for example, John Lewis, who I think is a

great apologist to atheists. However, he has some things because he's coming from a scientific background, he just can't bring himself to be a Young Earth creationist, even if that is the best explanation for what the Bible is saying in Genesis. I can't accept that. So he writes a book about that. He's absolutely, I think, absolutely wrong about that. You can go back and look at it yourself. Don't take my word for it, and don't take his word for it. But he says he can be very dangerous in

some of the things that he put out. I said, I could list many things, but he goes, here are some of the quotes I just mentioned. He said, this is from CS. Lewis. There are people and other religions who are being led by God's secret influence to concentrate on those parts of their religion which are in agreement with Christianity, and who belonged to

Christ without knowing it. For example, a Buddhist of goodwill may be led to concentrate more and more on the Buddhist teaching about mercy and to leave in the background, though he might still say that he believed to leave in the background the Buddhist teachings on certain points and many good pagans long before Christ's birth and so forth. And then this Christ saves many who do not think that they know him well. True faith comes by hearing the word of God.

And Jesus said, I am the Way, the Truth, thee life. No one comes to the Father except through me. That is the offense of Christianity. And many times somebody who works in an environment like Oxford, who comes from an intellectual background, they will try to not be confrontational, even if they're writing in the middle of the twentieth century like C. S. Lewis. Did you know he died on the same day as JFK was assassinated.

Nobody even noticed, even though he'd been pretty well known. It just comes down to what are you trusting right and are you truly following God? And it also doesn't come down to us, you know. He says, Well, maybe they're being led to focus in their other religion on certain aspects of mercy. Well, they need to understand and they need to trust in what Christ has done for them, don't they Because they have to do something

with their sin. And there is anything in the Buddhist religion that says what do you do about your sin? You just, you know, work to be a better person, and you work to do good works, and God is going to approve you on the basis of your works. Well, there are rewards and there are punishment based on what we do in this life, and there are rewards and punishment in this life an eternity, there's rewards you can have. But if you want to escape punishment. You got to do

something with that sin. And that's why Christ came and died, and that's the thing that is unique, and that's why He is the way. And you can't come to God if you have sin. There'sn't anything that you can do to get rid of that. But Christ has gotten rid of that's the Christian religion. And that's not what C. S. Lewis was saying there. And you know what determines your salvation is one of the most important things that you need, that we all need to get right, is what determines

that. This is from Robert, and he says, mister Knight to reinforce the observations she made in the past. The rich thinking that they can merge with machines. Notice how every cat or dog has a completely different personality, traits, mannerisms, even if they're from the same litter. That's right, God made all things through Jesus. Every warm blooded animal is unique. Honda cannot make a robot dog with a unique, one of a kind personality.

They could make several different models to choose from, but not millions. From the beginning from observation, I noticed this with wild animals in my backyard, from crows to coons. I can spot the same animals each week by their personality. Each one is unique. Even a lot of money and computers cannot do that. That's correct. We are not simply, as I said before, a lot of these people they can't answer what is it about us?

And what is our What is it? What are we? Really? We're more than just this body that we have, because you know, the body can be there, and yet when we die, something else has happened. We are more than just a collection of electrical signals stored in the brain. There's definitely something else that is there. And of course we are all very unique, even to the extents I point out the other day. They're going

to start, you know, the biometric surveillance. They're looking at all these different ways that they can identify us, whether it is by our face or by our fingerprints, or whether it is by the way that we walk, or even the way that we breathe, because each of us is so unique that they can look at the turbulence of our breath somehow and make a determination kind of reverse engineer gives them a picture essentilly of what your nasal passages are

like or something like that unique in the same way that your voice is unique. You know what makes your voice unique, Well, it's also the same nasal passages and things like that. But yeah, when you look at the infinite variety that is there and yet at the same time the commonality of the same design that is there, that is what is truly, truly amazing. And so then this was also sent to me as well. This is the one that just got this morning. This is from that, he said.

Unfortunately, I didn't know that you're doing and ask me anything last week, so I forgot to send some questions. But I hope you can save these for whenever you do it again. He said, So, what denomination of Christianity are you, if any, and where do you go to church? Well, I would say that it's I would characterize it as a reformed belief. I'm not necessarily tied any one denomination. I go to a church that is Smoky Mountain Bible Church, and I highly recommend the teacher there. He's

a great guy, great guy. What's your advice for someone who was raised Catholic but thinks the Catholic Church as a cult and wants to go back to church well, I would say that it's not just a Catholic church that can

put the institution first. Karen was raised Catholic and it was kind of a cultural thing with her, and I think the key thing that I look at and if you say that something is a cult, I don't know what you mean by that, but I would say that the thing that concerns me about a lot of different churches is that they try to make themselves the thing, and you have to do it their way, and everybody doesn't do it their

way is wrong. We all try to understand what the truth is. We all do our best to try to figure out what the truth is, but it doesn't mean that we've got a monopoly on what is right. And so how do we avoid that? Well, you know, even if somebody is honestly trying to do what they think is right and they think they got the right answer, you weren't going to stand before God and say, yeah, but so and so told me this and I just followed them. Well,

you have responsibility to investigate it on your own. It's like I said, don't trust anybody, whether you're talking about politics or or anything that's important like that. You look it up yourself. Of course, in the Bible talked about one town where they didn't just take you know, Paul's word for it to Peter's word for some apostles that they actually looked it up. You know, it's become something a cliche. You know, the Bereans, the Brians

would look at this to see if it was actually true. And that's what you need to do. You need to question that. And that's the way you grow, and that's the way you deepen your relationship with God is to actually look at these things and to question them. And so that's what I would say. I would say, be careful if there's ever a situation where there's an organization that's trying to interpose itself or something else between you and God.

Right, there's one mediator between God and man, and that's Christ. That's what the Bible says. So you know, go to the Bible. Make that your standard. There's a lot of different ways that you can have different standards for things. You can have a standard of tradition, you can have a standard of what does the church leader say, you know, like what does Fauci say about science? Well, you know, do your own research about that. So you can have a lot of different things as standards.

For us as Christians, the Bible is a thing that is there that isn't changing, and so it's an unchanging standard. What is your advice for men who are single in their thirties but still hope to marry and have a family. Pray about it, especially in this environment. You pray really hard. And I would say besides prayer, you need to try to make yourself the kind of person that God would give a good wife too, right, somebody that he can entrust one of his children to your care. Make yourself

that kind of man. What do you think happens to people who believe in other religions? Can Jews be saved seeing as they don't believe in Jesus? Well, it was Jesus, as I said before, that said, I am the Way, the Way, the truth, the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. That's pretty exclusive, and that is the thing that really nobody likes. And the reason for that, as I said before, was because there isn't any other religion that has even a way

to even a theoretical way or whatever to do something with their sins. Jesus died for our sins. He died to put us in a position with God where we can then obey him and our obedience is now acceptable. But you've got to you've got to do something with that sin. And there's only one that has taken that. Let's see last question he's got here. If you were ever going to leave the United States and live in another country, where

would you go and why? Well, we looked at going to New Zealand in nineteen ninety eight because it was very small, it was very rural, it's very isolated. A lot of people. There were some elites that were moving there, and people were saying, well, if there's a nuclear war, you know, the southern hemisphere is going to be a little bit more protected than the Northern hemisphere with this stuff, all those different types of thing. But we also wanted to see the place, and so we went to

New Zealand in nineteen ninety eight. And I'd also read some things about how they had gone really hard into socialism, but then they basically bankrupted the economy. They had people who were at their embassies and other countries like the United States, and they couldn't even pay their bills, you know, got that

bad. But they pointed out it was very small and so they could make some quick changes and you know, be nimble about that and made some changes, and so a lot of people were saying so I think they learned their lesson about socialism. I went down there and we scheduled to meet with a guy who was essentially the rush Limball of New Zealand is the way they built him. But it was some other people who were there with a libertarian group

that I found through the Libertarian Party, so we contacted them. He didn't make it to the meeting. He canceled at the last minute, but I did meet with the other people. We sat and Karen and I we were talking to them about which country had the most anti freedom mentality, and they convinced me that New Zealand did. So, you know, it was a lot of well, we're not going to let you build a house this high because then you're lording it over other people and people can't see the scenery because

of your house or this. That just micromanaged everything to the f degree. And it's like, okay, you convinced me. But we had a great time down there. We really liked it. But no, I wouldn't I would not even think about moving. I'm here in the most conservative, most Bible belt area that I can that I know of. Not to say that others aren't just as good, but the ones that I know of, I'm here, and and I'm not really into any travel, so I'm not going

to be going around looking at any other places. And this is where I planned to stay one way or the other. We're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back using free speech too, free minds. It's the David Knight Show. We got just a little bit of time left, and so while we were talking about some of religious issues and things in that nature,

I thought, this is kind of interesting. There's a guy I don't know who he is, Jack Hibbs, and he's evidently got a big California church, Cavalry Chapel and Chino Hills, and he had he openly talked about politics, and he openly endorsed Steve Garvey, who was running for Senate in

California, and endorsed Trump and everything. So I don't necessarily share his politics on this a matter of fact, the only thing I've seen about Steve Garvey was a clip where he said I had no support the Republicans on this abortion thing. I'm not going to do anything to stop and interfere with abortion at the federal level. And again, even though I don't think that this is a federal issue that needs to be addressed in Washington, that's not the reason

he gave for it. The reason he gave fort He says, look, I understand people in California like abortion. I'm not going to try to override that. Well, anyway, he decided that, you know, he said, it's very important to me that we understand that God's looking for a candidate that's pro life. Well I don't think that's Steve Garvey. But anyway, whatever he wants to endorse, that's up to him. But what the reason this became an issue is because he did it publicly. And now this organization

called the Freedom from Religion from Religion? Is that in the Constitution, Well, no, it isn't. It's a free expression of religion. Whatever religion you have, you are free to do it. But the Freedom from Religion Foundation is always trying to purge religion, the exercise of religion out of anywhere. Did they see it? Tell you, what, how about we free ourselves of you know, ninety nine point nine percent of all the religions that we keep just one around. I'm okay with that. Well, I think

the government ought to stay out of it. And I think the exercise of religion is not the establishment of religion. And they get that wrong. In the same way that they say freedom from religion, we have freedom of religion. So you know, just change a couple of words around and you get completely wrong answer or a completely right answer, depending on which way you're doing it. But here's the key. They're coming after him, and I thought

it was pretty amazing when I saw this on Christian Post. I think they had this story and they said, yeah, look at this. He stepped over the line. He actually talked about politics in church. That is not stepping over the line, and the way they report it, they said. So he says, I want to say publicly right now today, I encourage all of you to vote for Steve Garvey. You got to vote for Steve Garvey. I realized that it's against the law for me to say that from

the pulpit, he says. So he says that, and he goes, oh, I just realized it's against the law. And then they chime in they say, well, according to US Tax Code five oh one c three, nonprofit organizations are not allowed to endorse or to oppose political candidates unless you are a liberal and which case a liberal Democrat, in which case you can go to black churches as much as you want. And you know that's not a problem. This whole thing has been settled by the way the Alliance Defending

Freedom years ago, was almost a decade ago. They said, this is not the law. This is an IRS rule, and this is an IRS rule that stands in direct contradiction to the First Amendment, where we have the freedom to exercise our religion, and that includes us being active in the public square. You see, you got people like Rob Reiner, who and Mika

Brazenski and all these other Christian nationalists. We got to, you know, intimidate Christians so they don't speak out in the public square if you can't be a Christian talk about Christian values and talk about politics at the same time. Bologney blooney, we have the First Amendment to protect us from that protected speech. And so what they did, the Alliance Defending Freedom, they had what they called pulpit front Pulpit Freedom Sunday and they had two or three pastors who

said, we're going to do what he just did. We're going to pick some candidates and we're going to openly and defiantly endorse them. And they made recordings of that sermon excuse me, and they mailed them to the IRS, and so it was civil disobedience and they said, do something about it. Well, fight you in court, will win. Well, the IRS didn't do anything about it. And so the next year they had a couple of dozen who did it, and then it grew and more and more did it,

and they did that three consecutive years. And I interviewed a guy from that group to talk about that about a decade ago. They called their bluff. They said, we need to do this on a number of issues. This is you know, this is about religion, but we need to do that on so many different issues. The government is bluffing on so many of

these things. When we go to medical marijuana or recreational marijuana, they have no authority to prohibit marijuana or anything else unless they passed the constitutional amendment like they did with alcohol, the eighteenth Amendment, to say we're going to prohibit alcohol. They needed a constitutional amendment everybody, whether they agreed with the prohibition of alcohol or not, agreed that they needed a constitutional amendment to do it.

So we got the eighteenth Amendment and the twenty first Amendment made it legal again. Then they said, well, we're going to do this through the Commerce clause. And they got a whole list of things that they have declared illegal through the War on Drugs and none of it, none of it will hold up to a constitutional case. It's why Jeff Sessions never did anything about the states that were legalizing marijuana, either for medical use or for recreational use.

And they're bluffing people in so many different things. This is not a law. This is something that was in the tax code, and the IRS called it the Johnson Amendment because LBJ. Lyndon Baines Johnson, the Bane of the Constitution, was opposed by some churches or something. When he ran for reelection as a congressman. He got angry and he talked to the IRS and he says, I want you to stop these churches from saying anything about politics

or political endorsements. So they put it into the tax coat. It wasn't even put in by the legislature, and it's not an amendment to the Constitution. They called it the Johnson Amendment, making it sound like it was an amendment to the Constitution. They're constantly bluffing us on one thing after the other, and we need to stand up to them, and we need to call their bluff. And it's not just on religious issues, it's on all of these issues. Well, thanks for joining us, Thank you folks for the

support. This week is very kind of all of you. And have a good weekend and hopefully we'll see on Monday. Let me tell you the David Night Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else, You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.