8Feb24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show. As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday, the eighth of February. You're of our Lord twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to talk about Elon Musk. He's now pushing carbon taxes. He's always pushed carbon taxes, but he's been quiet about it while he builds up his credentials with the MAGA people. And will they fall for it again? Will they fall for Musk

in the climate mcguffin as a fell for Trump with the pandemic. Mcguffin, it's okay because he's going to own the Libs. He's going to fund a lawsuit for an actress who was kicked out by Disney because she purged for her conservative politics. So we're going to also begin by talking about what is happening with the war. Ukraine has now moved the goalpost, actually literally moved the border if you will, into Russia. Nothing to worry about. We'll be

right back. Well, before I begin, I want to thank Guard Goldsmith for doing a great job Guard at Liberty Conspiracy on Rockfin and you can also find him an MRC TV dot Org. He's also on substack and it was chaotic. A couple of days had another heart issue, and so Guard filled in for us at the last moment. Always does a fantastic job. I'm always reassured when I have Guard to it. But as I said, it was chaotic. We didn't get and I want to apologize to people about the

podcast. We did not get Tuesday's podcasts up until nine pm last night. So it's everything's been kind of a hectic here. But let's get back on track. Let's talk about what's going on Ukraine. Zelenski has now moved the goalpost the border, if you will. He believes that there is territory inside

Russia that longs to him as well. And I said this when the twenty fourteen who happened, because you always see this, don't you, with these dictators, that they can declare their independence and their right of self governance from Russia. I said, okay. And then when Ukraine, when Crimea said another area said we'd like to stay with Russia because culturally we identify with them more and other reasons, they said, no, No, can't do that,

can't do that. It's kind of like the US who got their independence from Great Britain. And then when some states said, well we would like to govern ourselves, and again the reason is reason was terras. The reason was the Fourth not the Fourth Industrial Revolution, but the Industrial Revolution, a fourth turning at that time. And of course slavery was an aspect of that. It wasn't the aspect that everybody makes it, but it was an aspect

of it. Nevertheless, they had nearly had secession about thirty years earlier, based on tariffs and things like that. So they said, well, we're going to go our own way. No you're not. No, you're not, they said. And as a matter of fact, part of Virginia that we now call West Virginia was so strongly union they said, well, well, if you're Virginia's going to leave the Union, we don't want to leave the Union. And so West Virginia did the same thing that the people in

Crimea did. And yet the Confederacy, unlike Ukraine, the Confederacy said okay, you can have your own state. They let them create their own state, West Virginia, which still exists to this day. So it's when you look at this, of course, Ukrainian values are the values of the US government, they will kill anybody. You know, if you leave, I'll kill you. As Eric Peters said, say, that's basically what we're talking about with secession. So they continue to bomb those areas for eight years until

Russia invaded. And so what we have now is a government that wants a war with Russia. We have a government that wants a war with Iran, and we have a government that is at war with US a cold war, but they are at war with us everything about our way of life, invading us with foreigners. The barbarians are inside the gate, and we know who let them in, and it's an intentional thing. They're rewarding them, they're

financially incentivizing. That's something that even Rome didn't do. So this American Empire is circling the drain, and the war in Ukraine is circling the drain as well. And so what he does is he ups the ante and projects.

You see, what NATO has been saying is that we've got to really step up the effort here in Ukraine because if Ukraine loses, how many times have you heard this from US and European politicians, If Ukraine loses, Russia is going to march right through Europe. This absurd Domino incrementalism that they used to sell people the Vietnam War, Well, hey, if it works, you just keep using that same trick, right and so, at the end of

January, is Lensky signed a decree on quote Russian territories historically inhabited by Ukrainians. He says, this is the restoration of truth about the historical past for the sake of Ukraine's future. The government will also have to debunk Russian myths about Ukraine, he said, and develop interaction between Ukrainians and the peoples enslaved by Russia. You see right now the Russian border and their version of history

is just fake. It's misinformation. It's disinformation, and they're going to wage an information war to convince everybody that these areas that have been under Russia for quite some time really belonged to Ukraine for centuries. Russia, he said, has systematically committed and continues to commit acts aimed at destroying Ukrainian national identity, oppressing Ukrainians, violating their rights and freedoms, including on lands which they had

historically inhabited. This is again projection. It is Zelenski and Ukraine, which are trying to eradicate all Russian culture. Look at the church, for example, the Russian Church that is there, which originally began in Ukraine, but then they when there was a war in Ukraine, they moved further into Russia. And the Russian Orthodox Church that had origins in Ukraine was still heavily established

in Ukraine. Zelenski has made that church now illegal after many, many, many centuries and locking people up, locking a clergy up, stealing their property and all the rest of this stuff. It is complete projection. And that's what this globalist establishment led by the United States does. It is just yeah,

it is a policy of war and disinformation. And at the same time as over a billion dollars of weapons missing in Ukraine based on an audit from the DoD Inspector General, and this is an audit just of small weapons, small weapons, and so they began what they called enhanced end use monitoring techniques in order to safeguard key weapons, high tech weapons that are small, easily transported. So this is what this is about. And falling under the auspices

of this is about one point seven billion dollars worth of weapons. And guess what a billion dollars of that is missing sixty percent. Sixty percent is missing. That's a little bit better than last year. Last year they were missing eighty six percent when they did the audit. Where's this stuff going. It's going to be used to fund chaos and fund terrorism, because that's what American

policy is all about. That's what American policy has been about for decades, funding chaos and terrorism around the world and supplying the weapons for terrorists around the world. Go back and look at Iron Contra, look at the abandonment of all of these weapons in Afghanistan, look at how they created even more chaos, and there were against Libya fifty nine percent delinquency rates, an improvement over the eighty six percent of weapons that were unaccounted for in December of twenty twenty

two. So they just finished this in December of twenty twenty three. The Biden administration has sent over seventy five billion dollars to Ukraine since February of twenty twenty two. Actually it's more than that. This is coming from zero hedge. That is, they've sent over more than one hundred billion, but according to their stats, forty four billion of that seventy five billion that they have

is in military aid. So if we're gonna have a lot of that go missing, as it has been going missing, and we've been sending stuff to Ukraine since twenty fourteen, and some of the people who have been involved with that have said, you know, yeah, massive amount of this stuff goes has gone missing for the last decade. Yeah, it's gone missing for eight years. Then we upped the ante. But you know, I would think sixty to eighty percent of this stuff, well anywhere from twenty six billion dollars

worth of weapons to thirty five billion dollars worth of weapons just missing. Who knows, it's more than nearly all the amount of missing weapons in Ukraine. It is more than the entire budget for defense of most nations. That's how insane this is. We are the epicenter of cass or, sexual depravity,

drug use, everything else America is America. Think about that. So you know, as I saw in Afghanistan, everything, even big helicopter left behind, the US military industrial complex is like some kind of a global cluster bomb. You know, that's the thing about the cluster bombs. They weren't to outlaw those because they would put these you know, this thing was explode, put out a bunch of little tiny bombs all over the place to just go

off at various times, and massive civilian casualties involved in that. Well, when we go into war, we shoot so many weapons in and they get get transferred and sold and stolen and all the rest of the stuff in a

black market. Every war that we get involved in is like a gigantic cluster bomb, but with billions of dollars, tens of billions of dollars of weapons up for grabs going everywhere, creating war and chaos around the planet, all for the profits of the military industrial complex and the politicians that they own and pay. So, Thomas Massey says, without control of the Senator of the White House, the only viable way for House Republicans to countermand this administration's harmful

policies is to use the power of the purse from behind the scenes. Though most of this leverage of the power of perse is being abandoned in exchange for more military funding, because the Republicans are going to always rubber stamp that they want more military funding no matter what, got to have it. And I understand the defense is one of the few very very very few legitimate functions of

the federal government. But as we see with a border, and as we've known for longest time, our so called defense policies are not about defending America. They make us less safe everywhere, they make the world less safe. This is about the love of money, the root of all evil. Birdhouse Blue says, I wouldn't be surprised that the Hoodies and Yemen made a straw man purchase of missing armaments and used it against our own military and the Red

Sea. Of course, it wouldn't be surprised either. We've seen that type of thing when they confiscate weapons and then what they say is, you know we saw that with ISIS. They said, well, we didn't give those weapons of ISIS. They just bottom on the black market. What's the difference. But we know they gave them to them. They armed both sides. They arm both sides and every conflict. So if you push back against the

military industrial complex, here's what you get. John Potterrettz says that Thomas Massey is quote anti Semitic filth unquote, why because he opposed enough fourteen point three billion dollars for Israel. He said on x on Twitter Thomas Massey said, the Speaker just announced next week the House will vote on a clean bill to send Israel fourteen point three billion. Israel has a lower debt to GDP ratio than the US. This spending package has no offsets, so it will increase

our debt by fourteen point three billion dollars plus interest. I'm a no. And he says most of this money will go directly to the US military industrial complex, which, if you're keeping up, prefers to be referred to as the defense industrial base. Now, oh, I wasn't keeping up with that. It's necessary to rebrand when people start to realize what you're so I have the liberals. They stole the name liberal from people who really cared about liberty

at the time. That was liberal used to mean somebody who put liberty first. But they stole that label around a time of Woodrow Wilson, and they call themselves progressive. But yeah, well, now let's go with liberal. So they stayed with liberal, and then eventually they come back around to other labels. You know, they've come back now to progressive because liberal has been so discredited. That's what the military industrial complex is doing. Well, everybody

hates the military industrial complex. So let's not call ourselves that we're now the defense industrial base. He says, watch for those stocks to go up on Monday. He said, one clarification, the bill will spend over seventeen billion dollars, but some of it goes to replace weapons that we have given to Israel, and some of it goes for other random costs in the Middle East. In addition to this seventeen plus billion dollar bill, we will probably give

them the customary three plus billion dollars and the Omnibus bill. Well, that was more than John Potteritz could stand and so he said, of course you're a no, you disingenuous piece of anti Semitic filth. Well, John Potterretz is an anti American racist piece of filth himself. Quite frankly, not only

is he anti American racist filth, but he pushes war and murder. But Thomas Massey wrote back, and he said, so now, if I don't vote from mass of fourn a that goes primarily to the military industrial complex,

i'm anti Semitic filth. Your unfounded slurs will not change my vote because America is broke and my constituents can afford no more and quite frankly criticizing, as I've said many many times, criticizing the secular globalist Davos, vaccine pushing, surveillance, tracking, pushing CBDC, pushing government of Israel is not being anti submittic. That government is anti Semitic. That Netan Yahoo used his own people as labrats. I've played the thing for you many times where he calls up

Davos and he brags about how he's using his people as labrats. That's anti Semitism, folks. I'm with the Orthodox Jews on this. God gave them the land, He took them off of the land because of the way they responded to him, and he will put them back, and he'll do it himself miraculously. In the meantime, you've got a globalist government that does everything it can to suppress the religious Jews and to oppress them and to fight them

wherever they see them. The House passed to bill November two to send fourteen point three billion dollars in eight Israel, but it was rejected by the Democrat led Senate. In the House, it was a vote of two hundred and fifty ya's to eight hundred and eighty Na's getting a majority but failing to meet the two thirds requirement to pass the bill under suspension of the rules. So that is where we are right now. And it wasn't just Thomas Massey.

There's some other Republicans like chip Roy who said, I cannot send seventeen point six billion to Israel without paying for it, given that we are bleeding two trillion dollars a year. Said chip Roy, Well, that doesn't matter as long as we've got something that somebody in foreign country decides that they are entitled to, that they can steal from us, that they can try to get our elected representatives thrown out if they oppose that THEFT. I guess we should

just kiss their ring. Huh. Biden meanwhile pulls a Trump right, so zero Hedge. These guys are more alike than most people will admit. And so now Biden has assassinated a Iran backed militia leader in Baghdad. Again, these guys are on the same page more than anyone wants to admit. Biden and Trump tweedled d and tweedled dumb, especially for the people who support them.

So it's not not a surprise at all. Frankly, travagline, Thank you very much for the tip, says, our corrupt criminal government is trying to make it illegal for Americans to form militias. Yes, totally unconstitutional s DOT thirty five eighty nine Preventing Private Paramilitary Activity Act of twenty twenty four. Yes. I briefly talked about that, and I'm sure we'll have more to

say about that. They are trying to outlaw guns or trying to outlaw the militia, which, as I said before I talked about this, I said, if you look at the Constitution, they talk about a well regulated militia. That means that the government, if anything, ought to be equipping and training the militia as they do in Sweden. Switzerland, they equip and train

the militia. They're not doing that. For some reason. I wonder why when a government doesn't trust you with weapons, what does that tell you about that government? What does it tell you about Joe Biden that he continually threatens us with F sixteens? Oh yeah, you want your gun, Well we got F sixteens. Brian and Dev McCartney. I'm gonna start calling these zionists anti American filth YEP, the AAF instead of the ad L. There we go the AAF. The US and NATO have become the new Fourth Reich,

destroying the world while claiming innocence. This is from a guy who I once saw his name Drago. I thought, wait, is this the guy at the Navy seal that I interviewed? No, he was. He was Drago Desaian. This is Drago Bosnik. He said, you know, you look at Pepe Escobar, a Brazilian journalist. He often calls the US a rogue superpower. He goes, well, that's not an exaggeration, he says,

it's actually worse than just a rogue superpower. He says, we're barely a month into twenty twenty four, and here's Washington, DC, already bombing half a dozen countries, threatening at least that many more. This includes Syria, Iraq, and Yemen. Will nobody's even reporting on drone strikes all across Africa and in the Middle East, including occasional attacks on Afghanistan. They're also threatening

Iran, Venezuela, several other countries in Latin America, including Mexico. On February fourth, the US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan refused to rule out the possibility of strikes inside of Iran. On February the third, the UK also joined the aggression. To put it simply, there was an attack on American soldiers in Jordan, or maybe it was in Syria. So Washington, d c. Is bombing Syria and Iraq, Yeah, exactly. I mean it was on the border. There was a base that was on the Jordanian side

of the border. Another basis in Syria. What do we have bases in Syria for, well, because we are a rogue superpower or alternatively the fourth Reich. Major European banks, meanwhile, are at the center of a new scandal. Looks like they were evading they were on sanctions. Imagine that. You know, bankers are always running war for profit, aren't they, And yet when it comes to the sanctions, they're still going to make their cut.

They're still going to make some money out of this. And so we've got some of the biggest banks, one of them Lloyd's of London, I guess, which would just call them Lords of London. Lords of London is a part of this banking scandal. They've worked away about how they start these wars for profit and then and they don't participate in them. They don't even stop selling stuff even when there is an economic sanction. We're going to take

a quick break and we come back. We're going to talk about the pharmaceutical issues. We got lawsuits about more medical murder, and I hope we see a lot of these, but at least one more has come. We'll be right back. Tell Alexa to add the APS radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere from country to blues, classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot

com. Using free speech to free minds, it's the David Knight Show. Yeah, when sixty one, I thought Drego was the Russian guy from Rocky four. Actually it was a nickname of the Navy seal that I interviewed. But I think the Navy seal could probably take that guy. Not only was the Navy seal, but he trained Navy seals. But yeah, this other guy is writing this op ed piece. If you're not wearing a mask,

a New Jersey appeals court says that's not free speech. Yeah, I see the mask order gags not only you literally, but it also gags your free speech. You can't do that as a protest. How is that different? May What we should do is burn our masks, you know, like the American flying. That's a free speech. They say, So just take your mask off and burn it at the grocery store, burn it at the restaurant. Excu, Oh yeah, you want to see my mask? You follow

up? Theyre going to keep your lighter. A federal appeals court shot down claims Monday that New Jersey residence refusal to wear face masks at school board meetings during COVID supposedly outbreak. This is from the ap They did not say supposedly.

I'm saying it constituted protected speech under the First Amendment. This is the third Circuit Court of Appeals these lawsuits with all around claims that the plaintiffs were retaliated against my school boards because they refused to wear masks during public meetings. In one of the suits, the court sent the case back to lower court for consideration, and the other one that just dismissed it, saying the plaintiff

failed to show that she was retaliated against. Still, the court found that refusing to wear a mask during public health emergency did not amount to free speech protected by the Constitution. Well, it actually does. Courts get things wrong all the time, don't they. I mean, they've left us at the mercy of the TSA. They left us at the mercy of swat teams, all the rest of this stuff. They've left us at the mercy of the

NSA and the CIA. They don't enforce the Bill rights none whatsoever. If they do, they do a very limited scope protection of the Bill rights at best. The Court found that refusing to wear it was not protected by the Constitution. Here's what they said, quote a question shadowing suits such as these, it's whether there is a First Amendment right to refuse to wear a protective mask. We conclude there's not. Well, you're wrong. That's your opinion.

That's why they call it an opinion. And courts get it wrong all the time. Look, the masks, as we all know and new from the beginning, the masks were political, not medical. Refusing to do political obeisance is a protest protected by the free speech. It's just that simple. This is not complicated. This is a lie coming at you the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. It was never medical. As I said many times, I talked about it at the time, talked about this in early twenty twenty

when they started this stuff. So do you realize that in two thousand and two, when they started all this SARS stuff in Asia and people started wearing masks, and then people started selling these N ninety five mask it wasn't the hokey you know, you got a lone ranger bandetta, a bandana that you can put over your over your face. That's absolute nonsense. I mean,

have you ever seen any doctors wearing a bandana and surgery? And as they pointed out in two thousand and two, the imminent scientist that was there, she had published a lot of things. She had discovered parvo and other things like that. Anyway, she said, you may think that everybody, all these doctors are wearing these masks and surgery, but they're not. Many of

them don't wear it. And it doesn't make any difference. However, and she said, what we have found is that first of all, everybody knows that the airborne particles are going to go right through an end ninety five masks. Secondly, she said, if you say that it is to protect against spittle, after twenty minutes, the mask becomes so saturated with spittle that you still get the particles sent out, and yet they're smaller, which means that

they're airborne longer and travel farther, so it actually makes things worse. And so at the time in New South Wales the government said, based on her stuff, and this is in two thousand and two, when everybody in Asia was wearing the masks, they said, if you try to sell somebody a mask telling them that it's going to protect them, we're going to find you. And I think it was something like a one hundred thousand Australian dollars.

It was a significant fine. Significant And yet twenty years later New South Wales with Gladys bear Jickland was all the worst places to force people to wear masks. It was always political, It was never medical. It never had a chance of working, especially when you talk about masks and say well, if you just take a piece of cloth and put it over your face. Mask

was never even defined. They didn't even try to make it medical. It was always political, it was always an active submission, and it was always in defiance of informed consent. It was always, if you will, a violation of the presumption of innocence, because in this particular case, being guilty means that you're sick. They don't determine that you're sick. They were doing

this to everyone, healthy people included. Just like the lockdowns. The Court said skeptics are free to and did voice their opposition through multiple means, but disobeying a masking requirement is not one of them. And they give some examples. They said, well, you can't reduce to wear a motorcycle helmet. See, we've been going down this road and setting this table for a very long time, and not just with the annual war games. It began in

two thousand and one with Dark Winter two months before nine to eleven. We've been setting this for the longest time, decades, many many many decades before that, by prioritizing safety over liberty, you know, things like seat belt mandates, air bag mandates and all the rest of this stuff and many other things. And they talk about motorcycle helmet like, if I rode a motorcycle, I'd wear a helmet, but even then I wouldn't feel safe enough to

ride a motorcycle. That's my personal choice. Is somebody else's personal choice if they what they want to do, And we don't get to tell people make these public choices over the individual's choice for what they want to do for help, do we. Interestingly enough, these are the same people typically who not only push for abortion and say well, my body, my choice, but

they will also push for government assisted suicide. So if they're going to push for government suicide, why not allow some made ride a motorcycle without a helmet. That's about That's getting pretty close, isn't it. Many of us would believe. But they won't allow that either, the nanny state won't. They are it's not about safety. It's not about safety, it's about control.

An attorney for the officials said, the winning side, the people who are saying you gotta wear a mask, it's not a political statement to refuse to wear this. So this attorney who was defending that says that refusing to wear a mask and violation of a public health mandate is not the sort of civil disobedience that the drafters of the First Amendment had in mind as protected speech. This guy's name is Eric Harrison. Well, Eric, do you think they

envisioned medical martial law? I think if the founders saw what Trump was doing with Fauci and his whole administration in twenty twenty. I think the founders would be spinning in their grave than anything like anything more an American than what the Trump White House did in twenty twenty and bragged, and he bragged about it, continued to brag about it. A mom is suing a hospital after her daughter died from forced ventilator and rem desaveet treatment that she did not want.

Thirty nine year old woman who was pregnant. He had developed pneumonia and she was very concerned. Told her mom that she did not want to be put on a ventilator, didn't want this other stuff. And he said, they'll kill me if they put me on that, and they did. They medically kidnapped her, killed her. And stop and think about the fact with this force ventilator. Trump paid these people to do this. Trump, the Trump administration, and Donald Trump himself bragged this over and over again. He paid

them, He paid to have the minilators made. He portrayed himself as a hero in all of this, and then he paid the hospitals thirty nine thousand dollars to put somebody on there, then paid them every day and then gave him a twenty percent bonus over what they normally would have charged for all that. Rim dezoveret as well. Rim Desaveret was Fauci's pet project. He had tried to get this authorized for use for AIDS. He'd tried to do it

for Ebola. Everybody said, you're crazy. This doesn't work, and it kills people, and it causes the same type of thing that happened to her, and that is kidney failure. Rim desiviet kills people kidney failure, and it doesn't do anything. And so Fauci did his own unpeer reviewed test and declared it to be the standard of of treatment and defiance of all that.

The guy that Trump gave a medal to. At the end of all this stuff, the mother of a Michigan woman who was given room desavir and died after being forced into a ventilator is raising funds for the wrong full death lawsuit. Too bad Trump won't give her thirty nine thousand dollars willy for the lawsuit. Now he paid the hospital to kill her. Jessica died in December twenty

twenty one. And this is again that was Biden was president. But this is the perverse incentives that were put in by Trump that were maintained by Biden. It's a tag team match. Well he was. If it was from Trump, Maga's okay with it. It's just forty chess, right, So yeah, Biden continued it, just like Biden continued gun control by executive order,

just like Biden continued Trump's pistol brace band. She died from kidney failure, collapsed long ultiple strokes, and finally brain heimhaging ten days after she delivered her baby v C section. Life site News reports that the hospital basically kidnapped Jessica, isolated her from her husband, gave her treatments that not only weren't necessary, but against her explicit wishes. We've seen this over and over again. Yeah, the father who was who's a daughter, had that done to

her and he's it'll be interesting to see what happens. That case is coming up in the fall of this year, and he has a judge has allowed it to be considered that not just medical malpractice, but malicious murder, which is what this is. Trump murdered people. He paid these hospitals to murder them. How is that not murder? You pay somebody this his murder for hire? Because like Fauci paid planned Parenthead to kill babies so he could get

their body parts and use them and his human eyed mice. So on the law firm that is talking to Life Site News the organization, as Julie Shlipp is the one who is that Life Site is reporting her perspective on this, she said. Jessica, who was perfectly healthy and only thirty nine years old at the time, was aware of the dangers of remdzevit and ventilators. She said, if they vent me, I won't make it out of here.

She repeatedly told her husband. She's transported by ambulance to Trinity Health twenty minutes north later that evening, but within days her oxygen levels began to improve, rising to the mid nineties with help from prayerful mediation but also a seapap machine. She even texted her eldest daughter that she was doing pretty good quote unquote, but the hospital was insistent that she needed to go on a ventilator. Initially refusing, she was told that in order to deliver the baby, she

would have to be put on one. Shlipp explained. She says, it doesn't make any sense why they needed to have her on a ventilator for a sea section, but Jessica wanted to do whatever was needed to ensure her baby lived. She didn't have a choice. So we're not going to do the sea section unless you let us ventilate you. That's thirty nine thousand dollars plus twenty percent on everything they do, including the sea section. Right. Purely

mercenary. That's what hospitals have become. They're owned by giant corporations. A few corporations own most all of the hospitals now completely mercenary killers murder for hire. Slip says that before giving birth, Jessica attempted to put the ventilator pull the ventilator tubes out of her throat, and the hospital says, well, she wasn't conscious at the time, so we strapped her her arms and legs down to prevent that from happening. Mm. They would say that, wouldn't

they Why is she Why are arms and legs stripped down? Oh? Well, she was trying to pull that out, but she didn't know it. She was unconscious at the time. And then when it comes to rim deserveret the records show that she was given rim dserviet four times, but a staffer said, no, no, she refused it. We didn't give her that at all. So it wasn't the rim deserveret that caused the kidney failure. The lung collapse was not caused by the ventilators the strokes who were not caused

by rim dserviet either. Now, if you what are you gonna believe a you're gonna believe the record that they put down they gave her four doses of rim deserveret or are you gonna believe the staffer. Somebody's lying about something. Either somebody put that in the record four times so they could charge the government, right, rim deserveret's of dollars and so plus theyre going to get a twenty percent bonus on that because they got her vented. But you're going to

believe the record? Are you going to believe the staffer? Now, if they didn't give her the REMDESERVERR, then that means that they fraudulently got paid or did they give her the remdesevit in order to get paid against her explicit wishes. It's kind of a difficult position there, don't you think for these people in that lawsuit. So this is where these criminals are at the moment these murderers are at the moment. A British medical or rather the British media.

UK's Channel four News warns of a quote silent killer, sudden cardiac death. They're doing reports on it, but of course nobody will focus and point the finger at the vaccine. And we all know that's what it is. There's no other explanation for it. And we look at this and the people who support Trump will just shake their heads. How dishonest? Can't they can't they make the connection? Won't they make the connection? Many of them know

better. And yet these people who know that about the vaccine will not make the connection to Trump. Don't they know better? Why won't they do it? In November twenty twenty three, UK's Channel four News ran a segment called sudden cardiac death affecting twelve young people every week? What is this? Silent killer? Who don't know? Can't imagine what it is? Maybe they should? You know, this is who is in the area, who has a what has changed? What's the motivation? Oh, you talk about that,

you're not doing investigation. You're now conspiracy there? Well, because we know that it was a conspiracy, conspiracy between the Trump administration, big pharmaceutical companies, the military industrial complex, the health bureaucracies. It was a vast conspiracy, so the network wrote in the description of the program. It's been described

as a silent killer of young, seemingly fit people. The charity Cardiac Risk and the young see somebody's already created a charity to make money off of this, and they won't identify what it is. They estimate that every week at least twelve people aged between fourteen and thirty five suffer sudden cardiac death, and one in three hundred may carry the condition. The Channel four added, a

leading pathologist has told this program they believe those figures are an underestimate. The mother of one young woman who died is campaigning for grassroots sports clubs to give young athletes who are potentially at most for at risk the most, to give them mandatory heart screening, buy specialists. And of course you see this happening in some schools. You know, from junior high school on up. That was never a thing before. They coursed young athletes into getting the shot so

that they could play. But notice how they will do heart screenings, but they're not going to really care about stopping the cause or identifying the cause, just like with autism. Well, we'll create support networks and charities to help people with autism, but we don't really want to know why this is exploding. It's amazing how pharmaceutical companies can buy off people like Tucker Carlson to look the other way and then bragg, Oh you mean you mean they're buying influence

with the people that were paying me twenty five million dollars a year. I had no idea, no idea. Hillary Nichols, mother of one deceased girl, said her athletic daughter died abruptly during a hiking trip with her friends. An American doctor happened to be there to provide care, but the doctor reportedly said that from the moment she began to try and to give treatment for over

thirty minutes, she already knew that Clarissa had passed. She said, nothing could have helped it even then, because it's such a big explosion that happens in the heart, but there was no sign of anything before this. It's just a shock, she said. And as they point out and Wine Press News, they said though the segment Never Wants, Never Wants addressed the who the what the where, the why the how of any of these types of

deaths. Thousands of people in the comments section attributed this to the trump shots. She says, COVID magazines, it's the trump shots. He wants. Donnie wants a credit. Give Donnie the credit. He's going to carry the burden of those how many millions? How many tens of millions of deaths on his head. God will hold him accountable for that because he doesn't. He

doesn't do anything with his sin. He doesn't think he's got any That sin just is the wrath of God abides on that man and increases every day. Every day. One in five deaths in the US caused by heart disease. Now COVID nineteen claimed the third highest number of lives. They said in twenty twenty one. No were those people who died from COVID or died with a

pc R test where they magnified this one point one trillion times. And you can find anything if you magnify it that high, said the man who invented it, who conveniently died a few months before they kicked this whole thing off. mRNA shots have killed fourteen times more people than were saved this is a peer reviewed study. Study concludes that for every life saved, there were nearly fourteen times more deaths caused by the mRNA injections. And this person at Technocracy

News, as a comment of bioterrorist, couldn't have done any better. And that's what I call these people who developed and administered this. Trump developed it, Biden administered it. It's a tag team, he says. Does this make you mad? It should. There were two hundred and thirty million Americans, about seventy percent of our population, your friends, your family, your neighbors, who are fully vaccinated globally five and a half billion people worldwide,

seventy two percent have received a Trump shot. Yes, you know, MAGA loves Trump. Maybe we need to change the definition of MAGA. Maybe we should call it murder again, or rather murder America GOP again. Right, let's do this all this again. Right, it was a mass murder campaign of Americans and worldwide. But let's go with the GOP again. The GOP which cheers Trump, which is afraid to call him out on this, the

GOP which you know, we know the Democrats want this. The dangerous thing is when you think somebody's on your side and they're stabbing you in the back or in the arm or wherever they administer the vaccine. But yeah, let's murder America again. MAGA peer reviewed study says, given the well documented serious adverse events and the unacceptable harm to reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse and to enforce a global moratorium on these mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining

to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered. The authors also recommended an immediate removal of the vaccines from the childhood ammunization schedule, pointing out the children weren't very low risk from infection, and that's what they told us all the way through, Right, Why did they push for kids. They pushed for kids for their legal immunity, you know. That's why they were playing this game of Corminatti versus the Pfizer biointech, you know, saying

they're legally distinct and so forth. That was all there to preserve their legal immunity under the PREP Act, but they needed to push it and make it part of the childhood vaccine schedule in order to go back to the blanket immunity of the nineteen eighty six, Act one of Pauci's first Betrayals of America, one of the first things he did. And so don't you remember at the very beginning of this one that you had to get the vaccine to protect your

elderly relatives because they were the only ones who were at risk. And I said at the time, if this was a real disease it was being passed around, it wouldn't be focused strictly on the elderly. You know, even when you look at their past when they try to sell pan mix and epidemics in the past, they didn't do that. It was evenly. The deaths

were evenly distributed over all age groups. I said, this looks exactly like the life expectancy charts that you see, and you know, the average age of the people that were dying was past life expectancy and they had two and a half comorbidities. That was the case two weeks worth of data in Italy. And it continued to be that way all the way through. And yet they had to do it to the kids because it was about legal immunity for

killing people. Let's understand what this is killing people. They don't like me to say that you know. So I'm going to say it more got punished on the podcast. We're putting that at the title mass murder. Well,

they just shut me down though I've been there for years. I've been on that podcast for six years, and they said, well, we just to disband and took it off, and we fought to get it back, but and that we did get it restored, but the damage was done in many ways, damaged us financially, damaged the reach of the program, a lot of these other things. I'm not going to stop. This is mass murder, mass murder. How can anybody pull back? How can any of these

Trump tards who bow before him and kiss his ring? How can these people like Wayne Allen Root and Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson, how can they cover this up? How can they let these murderers go without any accountability calling them into question. Tim Poole another one I'm so tired of here. That was four years ago, No pal, Tim Poole, people are still dying. Maybe you don't want to hear that. You do want to talk about your ballots and stuff like that. For four years, don't you nobody died from

your ballots? People died from Trump's shots. So the rushed vaccines as part of the study said guess what. Oh, yeah, you see rushing vaccines through without doing any testing. That's nothing to brag about, nothing at all to brag about, and yet he does. The problem is, you know, we saved tens of millions of lives all over the world, but I can't talk about it because our base are beautiful base of which some of you are there. You get angry when we mentioned the word vaccine. Don't get

angry. You did everything you could to get this vaccine. Now, I know it was one of the great achievements. We did months to be able to do that. But where Yeah, it was wonderful. Twist right and look, I guess in a certain way, I'm the father of the vaccine because I was the one that pushed it. Yeah, and you heard Candace. Yeah, it's a great achievement. Really wants great Yes, let me let me give you your your your reward for all that is great achievement.

Large GERIATRICCTICE reports three times increase, threefold increase in deaths after the COVID vaccines rolled out. This is from Steve Kersh. He says, where are the success anecdotes were where the all cause mortality dramatically fell in a US geriatric practice. After these shots rolled out, he said, all I can find are anecdotes like that from Dianna Klein and are In with thirty five years of experience, who wrote a top rated book on Amazon about what she observed in the

large geriatric practice that she works at with thousands of elderly patients. In her practice, they would regularly see eight to ten deaths a year up to and including the year of the pandemic twenty twenty. In twenty twenty two, they saw thirty six deaths. In twenty twenty three, they saw forty eight deaths. They've never seen anything like this, and he said the chances of that happening by chance are astronomically low. He said, this is not random bad

luck. This kind of increases caused by something, but nobody wants to look at what cost it. You know, they're now at the point where they're not they can't deny what is happening to young people dying suddenly. They can't deny any of this stuff. They have done that for the longest time.

Now what they're trying to do is to come up with either just to acknowledge it and say we're going to you know, screen people kids to play sports, or we're going to you know, create these charity organizations or something like that, or they will try to come up with a different cause. But it was always there. And I reported that in January of twenty twenty one, there's a guy who was working in a nursing home and he said,

we didn't have anybody die throughout twenty twenty. And that's what he says. This nurse is saying. She said that they would usually have eight to ten deaths a year up to it, including twenty twenty. It was nothing new, and that's what he said. He said, we kept these people, none of them got sick in twenty twenty. And then in January twenty twenty one, they rolled out the Trump shots and he said, we got people

dying all over the place. And he was crying about it, crying about it, and he said, the ones that didn't die, they're kind of in this fog. We knew this from the very beginning. You know, this is now more than three years that we've known this. Nothing being done. This nurses are in says she knows all the cases and the people who died went downhill fast after getting the vaccine. It was the only common intervention amongst these patients. Everyone who died was vaccinated. But then most of the

patients were vaccinated, so that's to be expected. But again, a threefold increase immortality, nothing to see, Just move on. New emails show that Amazon cave to the Biden administration pressure to sence Sir COVID books that expressed dissenting views. Well, not really much as surprise, since the Biden administration is all about censorship. And of course you know these people who cry crocodile tears saying, oh, these conservatives, look at them at the school boards.

They are into book banning and book burning. They're a bunch of Nazis. Because people want to get rid of the porn books of children and two children that the schools are pushing on them and the libraries are pushing on them. That's not what we're talking about here. We're talking about real censorship. We're talking about censorship of medical debate. At a time when we're told that this is unprecedented and we have to take political action against people it's never been done

before. We have to force one kind of medical treatment that's never been done before. We should have a medical debate about that. But any books that are written about that, any comments on social media, those are censored. And so this is done, of course by Amazon. So you're not surprised. I'm not surprised either. But stop and think about this for a moment, because what the Biden White House is saying, as they said, well, you know, they didn't have to do We just suggested it. We

didn't force anybody to do this. And that's exactly what the MAGA people say about Trump. They didn't force anybody to do it. This is the Democrat governors who did it. And so Reason magazine says, well, was Amazon free to ignore this? Were they free to ignore the pressure campaign from the White House to suppress anti vaccine books? You see, this is what the

Trump white House did. It pressured people, It paid and bribed states to do all these things, locked down social distancing masks, vaccines, It paid the vaccine companies to develop the vaccines, that used the military to deliver the vaccines. But Trump's not to be held responsible for any of that. And now the Biden white House is saying they were free to ignore what we asked them to do. We asked them to suppress this information so we wouldn't have

a medical debate. And Amazon could ignore that if they wanted. You see you even hear Fauci saying, well, you know, I didn't force anybody to do it, right, they pressured Amazon. The Amazon episode is reminiscent of a nineteen sixty three Supreme Court case that likewise involve the sale of books, where government officials perceived the books as a public menace. In nineteen fifty six, Rhode Island General Assembly created the Commission to Encourage Morality and Youth,

just the opposite of what it is today. We have commissions to encourage immorality of youth. But in this particular case that went to the Supreme Court, it was Bantam Books versus Sloman, Rhode Island's cultural watchdogs would notify a distributor that certain books or magazines. According to Justice William Brennan, they wrote this,

I'm quoting him. They would quote notify a distributor that's certain books or magazines distributed by him had been reviewed by this commission and had been declared by a majority of its members to be objectionable for sale. Distribution or display the use under eighteen years of age unquote. One distributor, Max Silverstein and sons received at least thirty five such notices, which typically quote thanked Silverstein in advance

for his cooperation with the commission unquote. To reinforce these warnings from the Commission, a local police officer usually visited Silverstein shortly after Silverstein's receipt of a notice in order to learn what action had been taken. So this is a clear intimidation coercion, a roll soft tyranny, if you will, but tyranny. Nevertheless, by the way, you have a commission and a police officer comes by, well, what are you doing about this? The type of thing?

What if instead, what if instead of sending a uniform police officer around, what if they sent a guy with a checkbook. Because that's the way that Trump did it, you see. But of course he's not to be held responsible for any of this stuff, none of it. Sixty eight American colleges still have vaccine mandates in place. Harvard is the worst one. I wonder if they're copying the others. They're plagiaristic. President. And by the way, it does not does that mandate does not apply to the faculty or

staff, just to the students. College mandates. No college mandates is the organization and they said, quote, Harvard is the only Ivory league that still requires students to show proof that they have taken either the initial COVID vaccine series, which is no longer available, or the most up to date booster, even though such requirement exists for faculty and staff. There you go, luster illustrate for life. I guess that's what this is. It's the number eight.

Thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. Question One do you know about the innovative zones where corporations are going to be free from government and taxes, pay in crypto and build what I think is a neo feudal company towns. I don't know is that what they're talking about doing in

California, because I don't really see California allowing that to happen. I know that there's a group of billionaires that have done that, and I know in the past you've had libertarian organizations that have said, we need to have a c studying community. Let's s something that is in international law waters and it's floating out there and it's under nobody's jurisdiction, so we can be completely free.

My thing is, I don't think any the closest if there's something there, the closest government to them is going to send a little navy over and take that over and fleece them. I think is the way human nature works. So you know, they better have the ability to defend themselves if they do something like that question to us, a lot like what Disney is already

doing in Florida. Yes, they And that was one of the interesting things was when they got into they picked this fight over printal rights with the Santis, and it was the first time since I was in high school that anybody in either party had ever questioned the idea of whether or not Disney ought to be a government unto itself. And of course they were the Ready Creek District

there in Orlando. They went in secretly bought up all this property using a lot of different shell corporations, the same thing that Gates is doing now with farmland, and then came to them in the block and said, okay, give us governmental power. And so that way, you know, when something happened somebody gets injured on a on a ride or something. They don't have to explain it to anybody. They can investigate themselves and keep it all under

the mat. And nobody ever questioned that. Nobody ever questioned that until they picked the fight with the Santas and then that came up. And then question three, does this fall in line with libertarian values? I think yes, I think it does. I think it falls in line with self governance. You know, it'd be nice if there was some new world to go to, which is the foundation of America for the most part. You know,

this this area where there was no organized government. You know, the Indian tribes did not have any organized government, and they didn't claim to own the land or anything like that in that regard, and so they could just go in and set this up and live freely. And I think people would like to be able to do that today. They're just isn't anywhere they can go.

And I think whether you do it, you know, on whether you go in and secretly buy this stuff up, you may be you know, if you buy enough politicians, you may be able to get away with what they did in Florida. And from a libertarian standpoint, I mean, for the most part, the ready Creek District was pretty well run, and in terms of covering up any ride injuries or anything like that that would happen. Government does that kind of stuff all the time, so it's not really that

much different in terms of its flaws. But you know, in terms of its ability to operate efficiently, I'm sure that it was aught more efficient than the other stuff. Max b thank you for the tip, he says. David Guard was great holding down the fort. Always is. He always is happy to see you're feeling better and back steering the ship. Well, thank you. Nick Ellenbecker says, well, the vax mandate Harvard is ensuring no

independent thinking people who question the official narrative in their school. Well, that's right. They're not there to teach people critical thinking. They're there to make you part of the establishment. That's what Harvard is really about. The only reason that you would go to Harvard. You can get the same books and they get the same education somewhere else, and your education not limited, of course, to what your professors do. I had to catch up when I

went to college because I skipped all the math classes and everything. I mean, I just skipped all the math. Everybody was like how'd you graduate without take on? Because I don't know, but I had to catch up. I had a lot of catch up to do. And so what I did was I got multiple math textbooks from different different places, and even got the US Naval Academy book from back in their textbooks from back in the nineteen forties and use that stuff. And I just did a bunch of stuff in parallel.

You know, you're not sitting there limited to what your teacher teaches you. If you really want to learn a subject, you can do it anywhere. You don't have to go to Harvard or MIT or anything like that. Handy. The experts say that gardening is causing it, that's right, And they were saying it's not even the labor of the gardening that's causing it. They said, you know, people are stirring this up. There's some mysterious substance. I don't know, maybe we should call it the ether or humors

or something. I don't know, that's causing people. That's total nonsense. M sellers. Our college age kids struggle with so much propaganda. It's hard being unvaxed in a vaxed world, but they're standing strong to it. I appreciate that. I only had a little bit of that. When I was in school fifty years ago. I had a hardcore Marxist history professor and some others as part of the core curriculum because it wasn't all math and science. And one of them was so bad I just dropped the class, not even

going to fight with him. Take something else, North American House, Hippo, Good to see you there, he says. All you have to do is look at who is still wearing the face diapers, and you know it's political. It's their symbol of obedience, and they demand that we wear it too. That's right, John Henry three seven seven seven. Our founding fathers would have burned Washington to the ground at the beginning of this fake pandemic. That's right, that's right. Instead, we're going to try to put tweedlede

and tweedledumb back in, whichever one we get. Just unbelievable, Brian deb McCartney. They killed two of our dear Christian friends with these ventilators and run death is near Rem Dezevir. I'm sorry to hear that. A lot of people, and that's the thing we don't know that that's how they do this right. They isolate people so that you think, well, once I know somebody, but that's just not happening. They tell me that it's safe.

And and even though it looks like, you know, people are dying from this and not from that so called pandemic, the press says otherwise, and many people will believe that Yona CMS has been paying out very lucrative bribes to the hospitals for doing such. Yes, and of course then they threatened them

that if they didn't vaccinate all their nurses. In twenty twenty one, Biden administration threatened them and said, if you don't do that, not only do you not get those bonuses that you got used to under Trump for the last year and a half, but we're going to take away all your Medicare Medicaid payments, which is the basis of their business. We'll put you out of business if you don't do it. And that's what they do. They bribe people. They use the money given to them created out of thin air,

the Fiat currency. They use that to bribe people. It doesn't really matter if you put your health wishes in writing when they violate them anyway, says Brian Democrat, you know it doesn't. They do ignore written orders. They do put people and do not resuscitate in spite of what you do. MARYA. Myers says, most people who died didn't die until they went to the er. Then they poisoned them and took their oxygen away because they could keep

patients from family. That's the key part of it, as well all of it. It's just amazing when you think about how multi level this was. It was very well plotted. Murder Nancy Chambers painful listened to. Since my husband was killed by COVID protocol dead seven days after the modern of acts without consent. I'm so sorry. KWD sixty eight virtue signals, masks evs, Yes, even the MAGA hats. Yeah, yeah, I don't forget.

You know that the masks were being sold by Mike Adams. I even had somebody sent me an email and said, you know, I pought a bunch of these things from Mike Adams, and then, yeah, I realized that there's things that don't work. I tried to send them back. I wouldn't take them back, but I was I went on with Alex with this stuff, and I was ranting about these masks and how they didn't work and turned break. Alex goes guys tell them to a was do an Info Wars mask

with Info Wars across front. It's like, yeah, how can I make money out of this? And how can I scare more people? And m seller someone I know had to pick up their eighteen month old yesterday from daycare because he was in pain and inconsolable, had his shots days before. Oh mom, made no connection whatsoever. People, I see that all the time, all the time, whether you're talking about nine to eleven, are you

talking about this? You know, lady that I saw in a store one time, she worked in that office, was telling me about the trillions of dollars missing, the corruption, all this kind of stuff made no connection to the fact that you know, and my office was the one that was hit. Not amazing, and then that all stopped. Can't understand why Birdhouse blues and November twenty twenty, the drop off and flu numbers following COVID's arrival was

swift and global still perplexed how flu disappeared and reappeared? Yeah, be slice. Our pediatrician told me with a straight face, flu has disappeared. It's been re labeled. Yeah, stealth Patriot Fisher Price is going to have to start making pacers pacemakers. Yeah. Yeah, it's bad, It's really bad. Well, I want to get on before. I'm gonna cut the comments short here, but I want to get on too. We're on pharmaceuticals. Let me get into climate, and we're gonna do that when we come back.

We have but Tony's gonna be joining us at the bottom of the hour, So I want to talk a little bit about about climate before we get into that. We'll be right back. You know, world of deceit. Telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to the David Knight Show. All right, welcome back. Let's talk a little bit about what Elon Musk is doing. And he is pushing carbon tax again. He's reverting back to form. Actually he never left, never left that ten years ago.

And this is comments from Technocracy News about what he's just recently said. I'll play a little bit of what he just recently said ten years ago. In twenty twelve, Business Insider wrote, Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk would rather see the government place a tax on carbon emissions than increase tax credits for buyers of electric vehicles. He said last night, he said, the right thing to

do is to place a tax on car. It. Now, this is a guy who became the world's richest man by the incentivization these tax credits for buying electric cars, and he knows that he can make more money with carbon credits. And the way they're going to do that is going to be with something similar to the natural asset companies that you just we nearly had imposed on

us. They will come back with that. That is I think the ultimate plan to be able to confiscate property, and maybe they'll do it by massive default or this particular case, take public property, even the national parks, and say, okay, that's now under our stewardship, and everybody's going to pay a global carbon tax, and then we'll get a percentage of that. And then whatever we get in terms of that global carbon tax money, we will keep half of it and we'll give half of it back to the community.

And they'll even do that with a private property as well, although with private property they'll keep far more than half of it. That's going to be the way that they're going to monetize and distry beat this carbon tax money to these billionaires, to these big funds like black Rock and Vangarden, State Street and that type of thing, and that's the way they take everything, and

so that's how he gets richer. The subsidies were great for him. And of course Elon Musk was able to take evs and make them very futuristic, high tech fantasy vehicles by talking about his autonomous driving stuff, right, that was the sizzle for the stake. In twenty fifteen, he addressed the UN Climate Summit COP twenty one in Paris, and what came out of that was

the Paris Climate Accord at COP twenty one in twenty fifteen. And that's, by the way, when the World Economic Forum started saying, you know, you'll own nothing and you'll be happy. That's when they started talking about smart cities and all that COP twenty one in Paris. There, Elon Musk addressed them and said Tesla and SpaceX CEO. Musk gave a speech at Paris and he said, they said, it's important, this is business inside at the

time. It's important to note that Musk has never been about building cars or going to Mars or applying solar power. More widely, he has a vision for the future that uses those businesses as a means to several important ends. Freedom from fossil fuels. That is what he's ultimately about. But he says, okay, that is his core thing. This core thing isn't making money.

Climate change. That's really what he's about. Climate change is the biggest threat that humanity faces this century, except for ar Musk said in twenty eighteen, I keep telling people this. I hate to be Cassandra here, but it's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye. He says, well, that's where he is, and he is still talking about that. And as Technocracy News points out, Elon Musk is introducing his new right wing fans

to the idea of implementing a carbon tax. And I think that what he's doing, as I said at the beginning of the program, I think that Elon Musk believes that he can get these MAGA people to buy his climate mcguffin, just like they went hook line and sinker for Trump's pandemic mcguffin. Because the MAGA people are experts at double think. They can look at these carbon taxes, Oh no, no, no, that's a climate change. I don't believe in that the pandemic. I don't believe in that, But then

they will fall lockstep behind Musk and Trump while they pull this through. And so a Technocracy News says, regardless of where you stand politically, it's a fascinating situation. I remember not too long ago when the right consistently attacked him taking advantage of government subsidies at his companies. Oh but now he's our hero because he bought Twitter, and he's portrayed as suffering. And you know, look at he He lost forty billion dollars or whatever to give us free speech.

You see that all the time from the same conservative commentators that push Trump. On top of running six different companies, he is virtually a full time political influencer now. And he just wrote on February the third, the only action needed to solve climate change is a carbon tax. Here's a little bit about what he had to say. What I'm going to talk about today is what is needed to address the climate crisis. What actions can we take that

will accelerate the transition out of the fossil fuel era. So there's a certain amount of carbon that is circulating through the environment, so it's going into the air and getting absorbed by plants and animals and then getting back into the air. And this carbon is just circulating on the surface, and this is fine, and it's been doing that for millions, hundreds of millions of years.

The thing that's changed is that we've added something to the mix. So this is what I would call the sort of the turd in the punch bowl. We're added all this extra carbon to the carbon cycle, and the net result is that the carbon in the ocean's atmosphere is growing over time. It's much more than can be absorbed. Okay, this is enough for this, right, you get the idea. He's no different than John Carey, no different than Al Gore, no different than any of them. But he's on our

side, isn't he. This is the fundamental issue. Yes, speech is very fundamental, and of course free speech free. There isn't free speech at Twitter. You're not free to criticize him. I never got off of shadow Band when he started doing this stuff. So yeah, free speech is great, but it's much bigger than one social media platform. People going to react to this. You think they'll give him a pass. I absolutely do think

they'll give him a pass. There's been a little bit of pushback. For example, when you look at Trump and this is again, this is where he's always been, and where has Trump always been? Trump has always been a New York Liberal Democrat who is a friend of Epstein and all the people in the Playboy scene up there, the sex scene, and that's he's actually

boasted about that in a lawsuit where he was being accused of rape. I can do anything I want to to anybody because I'm a celebrity, right, And that's the way it's always been, whether or not you like it, whether or not you think that's a good thing, because I'm a celebrity and I can do this kind of stuff. He's always been that way. So, you know, Jeffrey Epstein is you know, the other billionaire that helped to make him besides Trump was likes Wexner, and he had his victorious secret

stuff. Well Trump bought his, you know, the beauty pageants and everything. And as part of those beauty pageants before he was talking about it,

he was talking about putting transgenders in the beauty pageants. And so this last yesterday or the day before, Trump comes out and says, yeah, I think the conservatives are being too rough on bud Light, too rough on bud Light, and his son Don Junior had said that at the very beginning, and he had you know, some got some bronx cheers from the Conservatives for that, some of them, and he stopped talking about it. But you know, Trump can do it. He doesn't isn't going to suffer anything from

that. But that's what he's always been, just like Musk has always been about these carbon credits. He's always been about pushing the climate mcguffin in the same way that Trump is always hung out with the braved left, the New York Democrat groups and so forth. But people don't see it in him, And I imagine, you know, the MAGA crowd will be perfectly capable of double thing with Elon Musk as well. I think that's why Musk is making

the kind of moves that he's doing. He looks at those people, he says, well, you know, if they like me, they will give me a pass on anything that I do that they don't like. Why does he say that because he saw him do it with Trump. Jason Barker says, I'm surprised Elon Musk wants carbon taxes with all those rockets that he launches. Yeah, that should put him out of business, shouldn't it, Except, as one person says, Dystopian distance says, carbon taxes for thee and

not for me. See, he's going to be getting those carbon taxes. That kind of recycling. They get to reuse those carbon taxes and recycle those carbon taxes back to themselves. That's what they get to do. Rockets and jet planes are exempt. Yeah, even to the extent that we have Taylor

Swift. Now is you got some teenager who is following her jet, her private jets and reporting their carbon usage, and so she's going to sell that jet, forty million dollar jet because she doesn't like that being pointed out. But she's got another one. Don't worry. She's got I don't know if she's got more than one more. She gonna have multiple jets to fly around, Jason says. Jason Barker says, because raw cash sucks CO two out

of the air, that's right, Yeah, that kind of green. Jason Barker says, When the Elon launches Starlink satellites in orbit with an electric rocket, then I'll take him serious. That's true. And so you know, we look at what is happening in California. Every time there's any unusual weather, it's got to be climate change. Now, not going to be global warming or global cooling, but it's got to be climate change. And so

they're pushing this. They're also saying, well, there's a drought in the Amazon, there's a drought in the Amazon, and there's big floods in California, so it's got to be the end of the world because of your SUV. As Daily Skeptics says, hysteria has reigned supreme as recent global mainstream media headlines blame last year's drought in the Amazon basin on human caused climate change. The BBC reported that without human involvement, the drought may have been one ounce

in fifteen hundred year. I'm sorry, not an ounce, but a once and fifteen hundred year event. Yes, yes, many ounces there. Damien Carrington of The Guardian said it hit the maximum exceptional level on the scientific scale, whatever that means. Those, of course, they don't ever see this with the vaccines, do they No. Those of more skeptical persuasion might note that the scares arose from computer models that were funded by Green billionaire investor Jeremy

Grantham. In fact, rainfall in the area has shown little cyclical deviation across nearly three hundred years. Severe droughts are common in the basin, particularly in El Nino years, and temperatures in Brazil have risen by only zero point six degrees and a grade since nineteen hundred. They don't even have good temperature records there anyway. But we've seen the same type of thing in Venice, for

example. A few years ago they were saying, look at this. You know, we've got Venice, the waters a rising, and it's global warming, and Venice is going to be gone within a couple of months. Then they were complaining because there was a drought. How do you get a drought? I don't understand in Venice where the canals go dry, But the canals are dry, and they were gondolas setting on dry ground in these places, and so they go through drought. Even Venice goes through cycles of drought and

flood. Oh but all of that is now evidence for climate change, you see, No, it just happens. It's always happened. An update on the Michael Mann versus Stein mark Stein lawsuit, and again to fill you in at something I've talked about many times. Michael Man is one who was behind al Gore's hockey stick and called a hockey stick because in his imagination there is

a connection between CO two and temperatures that's not there. And the fact that it's not there was what climate Gate was all about, the fact that it was all a manufactured lie based on a simulation, just like they did with the Imperial College of London, except this scam was being run by the University of East Anglia Climate Center in the UK. Both these things coming out of

the UK. When you got somebody at a Hoiti twitty university with a lot of degrees on their paper and they're speaking with a British accent and they got a computer print out, I mean that's a very dangerous thing. They can convince anybody pretty much. I mean it will just fall down and worship these people. A British accent and a computer print out. Are you kidding? That's you know, you got all the cards in that kind of a situation.

So that's while they were doing at University of He's Anglia. Then people caught on to it and saw that they were passing emails back and forth to each other, saying our models don't work. How do we hide the fact that the temperature has declined when CO two has gone up, When Michael Mann is saying it's going to go they're tied together, and it's going to go up exponentially, and they're more than tied together, and the CO two is

going to multiply that effect. And that was featured prominently an al Gore's thing. So I've said in the past, I was with a group that tried to get to his data, and he fought us and won. But at the same time mark Stein was also criticizing him publicly. Now he is suing mark Stein for defamation, and as part of this trial, mark Stein is commenting on it. He says, well, I'm not a lawyer, but I'm assumed. And but I assumed in covering a defamation trial, I might

be exposed to something resembling evidence of defamation. How naive I was. He said, virtually every aspect of Man's career is better now than it was before Stein's and Simberg's blog posts were published. He's suing him, he said, you'd defame me. Well, where's the injury? Is what mark Stein is saying. He sarcastically points out, he said, in every regard he has prospered, not suffered. How is he injured in any of this? He says, his salary is higher. He hangs out with celebrities such as Bill

Clinton and Leonardo DiCaprio, with whom Man testified to having a bromance. He was then working at Penn State, but now he's at the Ivy League University of Pennsylvania. He's making more in book royalties as well. If this is what harm looks like, I would welcome defamation by Stein and Simberg any day. And he says, in the heat of Climategate, doctor Curry called on her colleagues to employ restraint, and this resulted in her being called by the

plaintiff, It's Michael Mann. In the then widely read Huffington Post. He called her a serial climate disinformer. Oh no, being labeled a disinformer didn't work, though, so it was time to play the scarlet letter card before the me too era, That accusation sadly worked all too well. And all the time the good doctor spread those rumors, it might as well have been sixteen forty two, even though it was amid two thousands, and so the

following literally had to be stated and asked in court today. Doctor Judith Curry said, Michael Man knew who I was. My name appeared in one of the climate gate emails, at Man sent he knew who I was. I mean when this story was changed or altered to betray me as a graduate student. To my mind, the implication that I was, you know, just a woman sleeping my way to the top. And if you're a professional woman, this is about the worst thing that anyone can say about you. It

discredits your accomplishments, and it gives people permission to ignore you. And so defense counsel said, doctor curried, did you ever get any of your tenured faculty positions or department chairs or awards or publications or anything else because you slept with somebody? She said no. He said, Let that sink in, says Mark Stein. If you're a professional woman, this is about the worst thing that anybody can say about you. To scritch your accomplishments, gives people

permission to ignore you. This is what doctor Curry described today as hockey stick warfare. This is the Michael Man hockeysting. It's just amazing to me.

That people like Michael Mann and Fauci can get away with not showing their data, and the Imperial College of London and the University of East Anglia that they can cover this stuff up and hide it over and over again, and then when it is exposed, why they do they have a government inquiry to make people think that they're doing something about it, which is exactly the game plan

that the Republicans are doing about the border. Whenever everything blows up, you have an inquiry or you have an impeachment to make people think that you're doing something about it, when in fact you were doing nothing about any of this. The Bank of America is breaking his promise to not finance new coal projects. As I said, with the war stuff, you've got European Union banks,

Lloyd's of London and others are ignoring the Iran sanctions. Well, you know, this is an economic war and there's all kinds of sanctions against US. Bank of America, though, had promised people, and they were celebrated by all the people on the left pushing this climate mcguffin. They were celebrated for saying they were not going to finance any new coal projects, and yet they are now now the Bank has backtracked and said such projects would simply be

subjected to enhanced due diligence. Well, I think they started doing due diligence on this whole ESG thing, figured out that it wasn't working out too well. But when they start investing in these fossil fuel plants and these coal plants and other things like that, When they invest in coal plants, does that mean that it's going to be made available to us. No, Biden is

making coal great again as exports soar to India. See, we're destroying our coal burning plants here in America. Even when they were lying and telling everybody the peak oil was a lie from the CIA saying we're going to be out of oil and gas by the mid nineteen eighties, they said that in the

late nineteen seventies, and I've shown you the magazines. It was all Newsweek and Time magazine in lockstep with each other, as they always were same angle, same thing, and they had the same cover at the same time saying we're all going to be out of gas in a cup five or six years. And yet they said we had six hundred and sixty six years of coal, and so we got the coal. Biden's going to allow the coal to be exported. Will it be allowed to be burned in the United States.

Well, they're dismantling the coal plants, no matter how clean they are, and they're going to send the coal to India, no matter how dirty their coal plants are. India. You say, this is what the Paris Climate Court Accord was always about. The treaty that was never ratified, and that the Republicans, not a single Republican ever complained about that, all the Senate Republicans. I mean, this is something that you know, that's a major

thing. The Senate has the power to ratify or to not ratify treaties. None of the senators wanted that power because with great power comes great responsibility, and they didn't want the responsibility of taking a side in all of this. But by not taking a side, they did take a side, didn't they. They sided with the globalist. All the Republican senators ran, Paul ted

Cruz, Mitch McConnell, name him, Mitt, Mike Lee. All these guys sided with the globalist against you in order to push this Paris Climate Accord. They did that by doing nothing, By doing nothing and never saying, you know that that treaty I can't stand. And of course Trump kicked the can down the road as well. First he said he wasn't going to do anything. Then he said, well, I'll do something after the election. Day after the election, he says, I'm declaring that we're out of the

treaty. That didn't do anything. Never told any of these senators Mitch McConnell to call a vote. He didn't even have to take responsibility. All he needed to do was to point out that they weren't doing it. Trump was in on it as well. You see, Trump could have said Mitch or rand or ted, you guys need to call a vote on this, and if you don't, this isn't a real treaty. He could have said that when he took office in twenty seventeen, but he didn't. And so what

Paris did. The people who really believe that this is a global problem said that doesn't help anything. All you're doing is allowing China and India to build these power plants, and you can they're building dirtier power plants than we have here. You're not solving the problem at all. You're just doing economic redistribution. And that's what the Republicans and the Democrats are doing, economic redistribution.

So I remember in twenty seventeen when this is being kicked around, I played a clip of Humphrey Bogart from Casablanca where he says we'll always have Paris. I said, they'll never get rid of this Paris climate accord. Tony Ardburn is ready to join us. Now we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back to talk about economic issues. So stay with us here news NOOW at apsradionews dot com or get the APS radio app and never miss

another story. The common man. They created common Cord and dumbed down our children. They created common past to track and control us, their Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are

isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidknightshow dot

com. All right, welcome back and joining us now is Tony Ardeman of wise Wolf Gold and Tony's kindly set up David Knight dot gold which will take you to Wiswolf and let him know that you came through us. Thanks for joining us, Tony. That's great to see you, David. Thanks for having me back. Well, thank you. What's on your mind now with the economy? Well, you know, I just listening to you this morning.

The elites get so much wrong, the main stream, the powers to be and go back to the seventies, and you've played this before with like Leonard Nimoy talking about the Great ice Age that was coming and it's global cooling, then it was global warming, and then it's climate change and acid rain. They always have some crisis that never comes to pass and they miss the actual crisis or huge historical events as they happen. They can't believe it,

they don't understand how to cover it. I'm going back to the fall of the Soviet Union. How many networks we're talking about that that there was an imminent collapse coming. Nobody saw that coming, not in the main stream. They just again, there's some other they have another narrative, there's another mission that they have, and it's not to let you in on what's to come. I think that's our jobs. Talk about things on the periphery. And

again, you know, they missed the banking crisis of eight. What about the the weapons of mass destruction? They never do actual journalism, never talk about the things that matter. And I think one of the things that's coming across my research is the upcoming UH systemic banking crisis. It's international in scope. I mean, you have German banks talking about real estate bubble bigger than eight in their holdings. Even have Janet Yellen coming out and saying banks are

becoming quite stressed because of their commercial real estate holdings. And we have these giant vacancies, and you know, Gerald Salente has been talking about that for

years now, just since since the scamdemic, since the lockdowns. UH. These these empty buildings all over the United States and in the West, and this is coming to a head, I think, and I think the you go back to the Great Depression. As you know, between nineteen thirty and nineteen thirty three, there was nine thousand estimated banks that close in the United States. That was the beginning of the banking crisis in the Great Depression.

We're a year out now from Silicon Valley Bank following the FTX collapse. We're a year out from that. And of course one of their periphery banks was Silvergate. I used to wire silver Gate for my bitcoin transactions. They no longer exist, so there's fewer and fewer banks that handle cryptocurrencies. To me, that's the beginning of what is to come here in our Western economies with

these banking the stress on the banking system. So I wanted to bring that to your attention because nobody in the mainstream is bringing this up, and I think it's on the horizon. That's right. And when you talk about it, was it silver Gate. There was like two or three bank failures, and one of them was not even a bank failure. They were basically pressured at Silvergate. They were pressured because of their connection to crypt to to shut

down. They were not insolvent, No, no, they were not, And it was just that it touched FTX and it was in the periphery of that, and I think that was a lot of what they do is they pick winners and losers. I think this was more of the consolidation. They'll use this crisis to consolidate into the major banks and this will be the backbone of central bank digital currency. You know, that's the real fortys. I agree. The mainstream people, you know, to quote our buckminster full of

people cannot get out of the way of what they don't see coming. That's right, they what are you what's coming? What they're going to do is I had a friend who used to play risk together, you know, and if he's losing, he just nuked the board. He just knock all the pieces off. And that's what they're gonna do. They're gonna just nuke the board, knock all the pieces off, and then set them up the way

they want them to be when they come back. You know, Yeah, I own this property now and that one and that one and that one. It's interesting an American thinker. There was a headline that was very good with Evergrand's liquidation. Of course, Evergrand is this gigantic real estate company and in China, with their liquidation, and that's what they've decided to do. They're so bankrupt. They've got assets of two hundred and forty five billion, but

they got which are probably inflated. But assuming that they even have that much in terms of assets, they have three hundred billion dollars in debt and so they're going to liquidate it. And he said, what's even more important than that is the fact that it's emblematic of a lot of things like that that are happening throughout China, and that China's economy is so heavily based on real estate and the same thing happened with them that has been happening as Gerald looked

at the lockdown, So this is going to destroy New York. Well, that's what it did with China, you know, the lockdowns and the throttling of all commercial activity, but especially the lockdowns kicked off this crash in real estate. And this article is about the analysis of a Chinese economics writer who talks about this. I thought it was interesting, Tony that their economy only grew three percent in twenty twenty two and grew five point two percent in twenty

twenty three. Some of the worst showings that they've had for three decades now. If we would have something, if our economy was growing at that rate or better, the Federal Reserve would throttle it. They would say, it's going to overheat the economy. We're not going to allow that. It just shows you how managed everything is and managed to the advantage of China. It truly is a Potempkin economy, and it was the globalist who build that Potempkin

village. Yes, yes, it's fascism ex book fascism, and they completely controlled economy. I think what people tend to forget is that in a real estate crisis, what you're looking at is actually a currency crisis, because every time you create a commercial real estate loan in the modern era is there's a currency creation there. That's a creation of currency itself. When you get a home loan, that's new currency that's created by the banks. It didn't used

to be that way. It had something called fractional reserve banking. But as I've mentioned many times on your show, since nineteen eighty there's fifty times fifty two times more currency in the world today than in nineteen eighty. That's because of the amount of currency creation and the real estate market is tied directly to that. It's why in the United States we have to continually goose the market, lower interest rates, get people to take out loans, because you need

more currency flowing through the system to prop it up. And it's no longer about profit or production. It's all debt. And we're sitting on the biggest debt bomb in the history of mankind. And it's all over the world. It's systemic, and I think the Chinese have overbuilt. Their economy is suffering. Yes, they're pulling away from the US hegemony and the sphere of the dollar. They're pulling away from that. The bricks nations are strengthening, but

all of these economies are weak. I mean it's the US is to channel Dennis Miller. I think he's talked about being the valedictorian of Summer School, like we're the best of the worst, Like we've got we've we've got to You know, you have Paul Krugman saying we have the best economy ever Biden. Biden nomics is working. These people are delusional. We're sitting on a massive debt of economic weakness. Supply chains have been so disrupted they're almost broken.

And you know, you see these these selloffs around the world. It's not going to end well. And I think, you know, the central banks while this is happening, and you don't see this talked about by the mainstream at all, they're buying gold and I think they're they're planning for what they themselves have set in motion, which is the great Reset. I agree. Yeah, when you look at what is happening in China, so several

articles people talking about mercantilism. You know, that's now the thing we've always talked about, how well, you know, China is really kind of a fascist economy. They say that they're communists, and you know, but you've got to you've got to work with them and give them partial ownership in order to establish a business within China. They tightly protect their borders, which is

characteristic of mercantilism. You know, we're going to put up all kinds of barriers for for imp to come in, and then we're going to export things to people. So it is classic mercantilism. And then you also have an aspect of colonialism there with the Belton Road initiative, and these things are not really working out well for them. And they're really kind of showing their their

problems. You know, the Chinese economy has been built on slave labor and currency manipulation and intellectual property theft, you know, piracy, so piracy and slavery and mercantilism. You know, it's like we're back to you know, the Victorian times or whatever, the different empire. But it can't go forever. And it's one of the things that people talking about mercantilism that was really kind of an Adam Smith phrase that he coined in contrast to the invisible hand

of a real marketplace. And the thing about it is that at first it looks like it's really working well until it doesn't. That's kind of you know, where the Chinese are right now. And then to pour fuel onto this dumpster fire of the Chinese economy of piracy, slavery, and mercantilism comes Donald Trump and he's talking about sixty percent tariffs on China. What's that going to

do to the economy? If you suddenly, that's going to be more disruptive than the rapid increase in interest rates that the Federal Reserve did, isn't it. I mean, just all of a sudden reset all the deck. You know, if you were to come in like that, well we'd have to call ben Stein. I mean, it wouldn't be smooth holly anymore than fifty percent tariffs from the thirties sixty tariffs. Well, you know, China used our old playbook. I mean, let's be honest, they used the old

American you know empire. The beginning of the twentieth century, we were economic nationalists. We were the arsenal of democracy and the manufacturing marvel of mankind. We had tariffs. We set that in place. That was something that Alexander Hamilton set up. You have all four presidents on Mount Rushmore supported tariffs. Every figure on our paper currency supported tariffs. We we built the country on

tariffs. And yeah, you've talked with some great history about the tariff of abominations in the South and how the South was abrarian and the North was manufacturing, and there was a battle between that because of pricing. But in general, the United States was built on tariffs and protecting our base manufacturing. You know, Uh, Hamilton had read Adam Smith and The Wealth of Nations. He just didn't agree with the complete free market, and you know, it's

it's it's the theory and so China's used that. And if you go and look at their tariffs are massive, yes, uh, you know, on on imports, but they push politically for free trade. It's a very symbiotic relationship that they have with the United States. It's almost like they're they're parasitically making sure like they're they're ciphering off as much wealth as they can and letting things kind of collapse, looking for other inroads. And that's the Belt and

Roade initiative. In my opinion, that's the future that they've planned on. They don't see the United States as the future. They see that their their influence and the United States waning, that's gonna there's gonna create a vacuum. I think that's what they're planning for. But they have overbuilt and I think their timeline has been disrupted because you and I both know you can have central

planning all you want, but that doesn't really solve all your problems. You can you can make huge mistakes in judgment, and I think they have. I think they've overbuilt it. They've overborrowed, uh, and they've used the United States to the point where the United States is weakening, and then you end up having a Donald Trump figure, which I believe in tariffs, but the way he handled a lot of that in his administration, I just scratched

my head. I didn't really understand it. Some of the ways he was setting that up. He talked about negotiation, and he would put a tariff on, they'd take it off. I think we need you know, we look at modest tariffs across the board. You don't want to That's the key thing. That's the key thing, you know. The key thing is that he would think that he could do something that radical in that fast. I mean it's like, you know, uh, to jump that quickly is going

to be such a shock to the system. It'd be total chaos because people would not be able to react quickly enough to it. When you look at what the Federal Reserve did rapidly raising interest rates and successive I thinks seventy five bases points at a time, you know, three quarters of percent each time. When they did that very rapidly, what it caught the small banks and many others in a bad place that they couldn't get out of. It caused

some of those bankruptcies that we saw. This would do much more than that. Now some of the people are looking at it and say, well, after all, this is Donald Trump. He probably won't follow through with anything that he says. Goodness is that Trump, and he's throwing out radical stuff

here. But they said, the fact is that he can throw this stuff out, and only a couple of writers have really reacted to the insanity of changing rates that rapidly, right, regardless of whether your pro mercantilism and pro protection or free markets or whatever. To change it that radically, nobody's really even talking about that, And they said that shows that there's a real constituency

for doing that. Now. In terms of what made it more effective for Thomas Jefferson, he said, we've eliminated all internal taxation and we've only got it at the borders. But that was because they had a government that was

small enough to fit into the constitution. So if your government has Ron Paul has said for the longest time, he said, it really doesn't make that much difference what your taxation base is as long as it's really really small, and if it's really really big, it doesn't there's not going to be any good way to do it. The problem is that the government's footprint is too big, and its foot is stomping on our face like nineteen eighty four.

That's the problem. And so no matter what they do and how they restructure, this is like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. They've got to get government to be smaller, but that's not going to happen. And so they will play these games. And if they play these games, I think they have a chance of making things much worse very quickly. Let think go back to the Reagan administration. Late in his second term. They came to

him said, mister President, we're going to lose Harley Davidson. He said, well, we're going to lose Harley that it's the Japanese because we'd opened up our markets, we had free trade agreements. That was the way for us. It was kind of an addendum to the Marshall Plan. Let these you know, nations that we have destroyed, let them have access to our markets and build back up their economies. And they came to President Reagan said

we're going to lose Harley Davidson, and he said okay. So he slapped a fifty percent tariff on the larger import of the larger bikes, and they saved Harley. That act of economic nationalism saved Harley. But you're talking about sixty percent tariff across the board on all incoming China across the board. That is insane And did you're talking I like economic nationalism. I'm a fan of it. It's interesting that no one I ran on this when I was running

for Congress, no one who I was talking about. They loved the fact that I was standing up for the worker, but no one in politics usually talks about this kind of stuff. You know, there's a model too for it that you can actually look at the model. If you had a twenty five percent tariff across the board on all manufacturing goods, not just from China,

but just twenty five percent to get into our markets. If you manufactured, whether a vehicle or a machine, anything that's manufactured outside of the continent the United States, twenty five percent tariff, and then you eliminate the corporate

income tax for internal corporations. What that would do to give an incentive for companies to move here, build here, employ Americans and avoid that twenty five percent But a sixty percent tariff, that's that's But you notice that Trump is not talking about eliminating the internal taxes either, right, No, this would be an addition to what we've already got. And so you know that that's

always the problem. And when you look at what is happening with the IRS, you know they're going to give them another, you know, sixty billion dollars and then the McCarthy and Johnson both want to cut it down to like forty five billion dollars. They only get thirteen billion right now. So you're looking at the Democrats want to make the IRS seven times bigger, the Republicans want to make it five times bigger. They're not talking about reducing that at

all. They're talking about rapidly escalating this. And it just came out that these these IRS agents that they're putting in there, the vast majority of them are going to be for face to face audits, face to face audits, and they refuse to say that they're going to limit it to the wealthy four hundred thousand and more now not going to say that it's going to be for

everybody. And this is just the beginning. I mean, they've only su spent a couple of billion of the massive amount of money that's been allocated to them. The Republicans aren't pulling that back. They're not the IRS. Instead of saying we're going to raise taxes of the border and then pull the other stuff back. Instead of doing that, instead of you know, reducing the

income tax, are going to escalate this. And I think that's a part of the great taking to have this army of IRS agents that are there. But it's this is all going to result in a great deal. I think of chaos, and it's planned and designed to do that is what I think. And the gold people that are looking at this or saying it's also going to be a huge kickoff to inflation if they do this, because it's going to raise prices on every think so rapidly. It's really going to kick inflation

through the roof if they were to do this. Well, the only thing that really holds up this country anymore is small business. It's entrepreneurs, people that are still trying to keep the lights on and build things. It's funny

you mentioned the so called Conservative Republican Party. I think you could float passing the Communist Manifesto through the House of Representatives and they'd be against fifty percent of it, so they try to try to conserve as much of the change that goes on what the left and the progressives and the Marxists do, and the Republicans come along and can serve that a little bit. So we really don't have anybody fighting for the Bill of Right. Jim Jordan would do a hearing

about it right here. It's so weak and and but that's why we have to take care of ourselves and these parallel systems. I saw Katherine Austin Fitz has been talking about sovereign state banks a lot on interviews. You know, that's in the constitution. This is what we have to do. This is decentralized, build parallel networks. Because no one in Washington has come to save You have ridiculous ideas flowing out of there. And you know this is all

in theory too. You know, I've seen Trump run before in twenty sixteen. I don't know what policies were carried out other than in making you know, Fauci president. I had a question, you know, I thought this would be a great tweet for you. You should ask if Trump is re elected, does Fauci automatically become president again, or do we have to wait for the next he can become president very easily. He seems to be in better health than either Trump or well maybe a Trump isn't as good of health

as Fauci is. But you know, we got Biden there. He could easily have a Fauci become president. But both of them made Fauci president. And you know, that's the whole thing I said in the twenty twenty election, Why would I even bother to vote for president because we're being ruled by Fauci and we're being ruled at the state and local level by bureaucrats. Because you've got the state and local governments for the most part, would not stand

up to them. Some cases, if you get somebody that's bad at the state level, they're going to make it even worse than these bureaucrats. So that's that's really where the key is is that the state and local levels. And you know, when we talk about the state banks Tony that Katherine Austin Fitz is talking about, there's a real concern that a lot of states could go bankrupt. You look at Illinois, look at what is happening in California.

California went from you know, they were looking at a big deficit before all of this COVID bailout from Trump happened, of tens of billions of dollars, and all of a sudden they wound up with one hundred billion dollars surplus and it took them no time at all to blow through that. And now they're looking at a thirty eight billion dollar deficit again. And so you've got a lot of these Democrat states that are looking at essentially insolvency and that's a

concern. And if they don't, you know, that's another layer of concern. If the states cannot administer things that are there's going to be another level of concern for all of us. I think, yes, well, that's a massive loss of sovereignty when you have to go to the federal government and get a bail out for your sovereigns for your state. Yeah, where does that put you in the column of having any sort of powers anymore, because you're going to be not that I mean, they're already under the thumb they

take the federal money. But that's another level of subservience, and you know, that could create a system that could rapidly accelerate Balkanization in the United States of America. You're going to have some states, especially the Blue states, with people fleeing, not building businesses, no investment, and then you see these collapse because they just continue to tax higher and regulate more, and they're

going to have these collapses. I think that's inevitable. There's state budgets completely inflated, places like Illinois, places like California. He's going to be the first to go and they're going to be I think further link to the federal government, which is going to be a massive loss for liberty because the only way that we have any sort of freedom is to be able to flee into across state lines at this point. That's right, Yeah, it's it's interesting.

You know, we talked about the Potemkin economy of China and we just had Biden put out his adjusted figures. They added a million jobs that didn't actually exist in the Department of Labor and we all see that. You know, they always go in and they'll talk about what the unemployment rate is this quarter and how it changed, you know, from the previous quarter, and they always will go back and adjust previous quarter so they can show a positive

trend that is a bipartisan trick that they always do. But of course with everything, as with everything else, Biden takes it to another extreme level and he's done that with this. Now when you look at all of this, it's just, you know, the magnitude of it, the magnitude of the malarkey just gets higher and higher with Biden every time they go through it.

And it's not just that kind of stuff. But the other thing that nobody is really talking about, Tony are things like the record credit card interest rates. It's something like twenty seven percent now on average. That's just to me, that's such an abomination. If I was to run for any office, I would start trying to stop that at the state or local level. You know, it's just thievery to charge people twenty seven percent. That's like loan sharking. It's amazing. It's usory. Yeah, it is useder, it's

criminal, and they're taking advantage of people. I read a study a couple of days ago. Credit card defaults are up fifty percent in twenty twenty three, according to the New York Federal Reserve. Fifty percent. So people are living paycheck to paycheck, they're going into debt. It's funny Drudge had a headline. I read it on my show last week, David, and it was people are seeing prices lower in some columns, but the prices of groceries

are way off the charts. And I thought, well, because those items that you're seeing the price drop, and this is economics one oh one, you want to be a professor. They're not buying those things because they can't afford them, whether it's used cars, televisions or new phone. But they have to eat. So the prices are the things they need, they absolutely need, are going up. And so you have this duality of a falling prices in other places and rising prices in places that you need. That's the

definition of a failing economy and a failing currency. And the mainstream is not going to get it all the way up to the end. We are watching the death of a currency and it's slow, but the rest of the world is catching on. Their dumping the dollar, their buying gold, they're joining other financial coalitions like the Bricks Nations. The fact that Saudi Arabia, David, join bricks. Now we have bricks plus. The fact that Saudi Arabia

joined bricks is not headline everywhere over all these financial networks. Is not only that, not only did they you know, you've got now ten bricks nations and another seventeen that have like a memory kind of not a full membership status, but are kind of involved in that. But also the other part of the petro dollar was the fact that they would buy military weapons from US,

and now they're looking to source that from other places. So, I mean, the petro dollar is just gone in terms of its construct that was put there. That's that's going to have big implications for everybody. That's why I like to get out of the fiat currency, try to get into gold and silver. And of course you know, the World Economic Forum is talking about the fact that we've got to have interoperability between these cbdc's. That's what I

mean. It's a global currency. They'll have a veneer of nationalism on each of these CBDCs, but they'll be interoperable. It'll be one and the same thing. But before we run out of time, we've got another guest coming on. Tell us what's going on at why is Wolf? Well, we're just continuing to keep the supply chain open for our customers. That's been my

mission here since all of this has been accelerated in twenty twenty. I realized the supply is going to be the issue that first quarter of twenty twenty day. But I remember people calling in to get orders when the prices fall after the stock market collapsed, and I couldn't source it at the time, and I thought, well, in the future, I going to make sure that we have more than two or three supply chains. So I've set those up. We've got another location here in Dennison, Texas that I'm working on.

Wolfpack has a lot of great products. If you want to support David, go to Davidnight dot gold check out, Join wolf Pack. It's a great way to stack gold and silver, especially if you're on a budget. We have goldbacks going in every single order. Now I'm putting goldbacks in every order. That's great me. I'm making sure that we don't run on a gold backs for those sovereign state notes that are twenty four carret gold. So even if you're on the lowest budget, even the wolf cub of the thirty five

dollars a month get some gold backs. So go to go to David Night dot gold check out wolf Pack. We've got some great incentives right now, and it's just a good way for you to stack whether it's you know, fifty dollars or five thousand dollars. We can just to amplify that the goldbacks are actually have a physical gold, but a small amount on it. It's in the format of what you typically see is paper currency, but it's actually core carrerot gold. Yeah. Really got gold o note. Yeah. So

that's a great thing. And that's and that's the key. You know, what are we going to have as a medium of exchange as a currency, not just as holding wealth, but the ability to have a currency in case we can't get this done at the state level because the state moves very slowly and this stuff is coming at us very fast, so we need to have something like the gold backs that are there. Well, thank you for coming on, Tony. Always great to talk to you. We really do appreciate

your support. And again, folks can get to Wisewolf dot gold by going to David Knight dot gold and that'll take you to Tony. Let him know that you came from us. Thank you so much, Tony, appreciate it, Thank you, thank you. All Right, folks are going to take a quick break. When we come back, we're going to talk to a historian who's written a book, Not Stolen the Truth about European Colonialism in the New World, historian Jeff Finn Paul. And this is we see all the

statues that are coming down. It hasn't been widely reported that the New York Museum of Natural History and closed a ten thousand square foot area that was about Indians themselves. They just shut that down. And so he's going to talk about how this is a phony version of history that's being used to attack us and reset things culturally. So we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back to talk about that book, Not Stolen the Truth about European

Colonialism. So stay with us, will be right back. In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to the David Knight Show analyzing the Globalists, Next Move and now the Deep and Nut Show. All right, welcome back and joining us now is Jeff Fenn Paul. He is author of many books and articles. We're going to talk to him specifically about one recent book. He's a professor of global history and economics

at Leiden University. In the Netherlands, and the book that we're going to begin talking about, of course there's other ones that he's written that are touch on the same subject, is not stolen the truth about European colonialism in the New World. And this is very important because as we see everywhere, we've got to pull down the statues, we've got to rename the streets and the buildings and you name it, because somewhere somebody was involved in slavery or colonialism

and they stole the land. And so this is the basis on which the economy and the culture is being The culture more than anything, is being reset. So joining us now is Jeff, and so thank you for joining us. Jeff, I appreciate you coming on. Thanks a lot for having me on. David, thank you. Let's talk a little bit about what happened in New York because that is probably the most recent and strangest event that has

happened with all of this rewriting of history and culture. What happened at the New York Natural Natural History Museum. Well, I mean in nineteen ninety they passed a law with a really nasty acronym, NAGUPRA, and the idea was to protect Native American bones that had maybe been robbed from gravesites, and so that's rather understandable. You can understand how that's a sensitive topic. But recently under the Biden administration, they've started broadening the rules so that almost any Native

American artifact is now difficult to display in an American museum. And the idea is is that tribes should have sovereignty over all of these artifacts, but is a lot of modern tribes are not connected to artifacts that are hundreds or thousands of years old, so they've been given to tribes that they didn't really belong to in the first place. And then the other thing that's going on is that these things are basically being removed from displays. So what we're seeing is

the closure of a lot of Native American history museums. And the left is always saying, hey, we need to reclaim Native American history, but this is such a weirdly counterintuitive move. They're literally erasing Native American history from these museums so that neither Native Americans nor the general public can understand their own history. There's a lot of weird, weird things going on. Yeah, well,

you know, when you want to memory whole things. You got to do it eventually, do it to everybody, right, if you're going to memory whole history, you've got to do it all of it or none of it. And it's kind of interesting to see that this is a bill, a law from the nineteen nineties. I was just talking to somebody else on

Tuesday. We're talking about the nineteen ninety four Face Act, and the Biden administration is taking some of these laws from the nineteen nineties and using in a way that they've never been used before in the intervening thirty years or so. And so it is interesting to see how they're weaponizing these things and extending them in ways that perhaps they were never intended to be because they haven't been haven't been used like this since for you know, three decades since their creation.

So I think this is a very novel take on a lot of different laws. This is kind of a recurring theme of the Biden administration, isn't it. Absolutely? And I mean, you know, so they expand these powers and they claim that they're helping Native Americans. At first, it looks like this is just a sob to the DEI people, But you really wonder who this is benefiting, And I think it's benefiting only a few people in a

few tribes who maybe want to have more control over these artifacts. But ultimately, all they're doing is basically destroying scientific evidence on which we can create Native American history. Now, who might benefit from that? I think it's really people who are afraid of history because they want to sell such a left wing vision of history that they don't even want it to be contradicted by any real

facts. Yeah. Yeah, they can invent the whole thing out a whole clock, isn't The Natural History Museum in New York is another one that was at the United Museum if I'm thinking of that, is that the same thing? Yeah? I mean there's such a such a long history, I mean founded by Teddy Roosevelt, and it's been collecting artifacts that scientists have been using for over one hundred years. And now all of this evidence is being literally

reburied, it's being broken up, It's going to disappear forever. And I think they had a Teddy Roosevelt statue that had Sakaijawea or something there, right, And did they remove that they were talking about removing it, Were they successful in doing that or well, I'm not sure what actually happened with that controversy, but yeah, I know that anything like that nowadays is embattled, and it seems like right now it's only a matter of time until it goes.

It's much like what we see with you know, well, we've got to remove Roberty Lee, but then they come after Ulysses Grant as well. You know, they come after an abolition is as well. They can't even be consistent with their own rationale. They just really want to get rid of everything. So you go to the Natural History Museum, get rid of Teddy Roosevelt, you get rid of Picaigue, and then all the other Indians as

well. And it's interesting that they did it so quickly. You said, it's a ten thousand square foot area that they had there are the Indians, and it took them just a few hours to take that down the end of January. Yeah. Absolutely. And the thing is is when they reopen these holes we've actually seen because they did this with one of the halls at the same museum, they DEEI wash it in such a way that people's ancestral stories

are told as facts and scientific facts are shunned aside. So if somebody says, my grandfather told me the story, no matter how crazy it was, that now gets presented to the public as fact, that's obviously doing a disservice to everybody. Yes. Yes, And it was just also in January where they tried to get rid of William Penn. They're going to remove him from his exhibit and put up Indian information, they said in the Indian tribes that

were there were some of the people who are pushing against it. I mean, it's because of local resistance that they were able to stop that. And the Indian said, no, he was a good guy. He was a friend to us, you know, and so they were able to stop it. There. You see this in many cases, and you're talking about a lot of these artifacts are very very old, and they're not sure really what

tribe they belonged to. But in many cases, I know, when you're from Florida as well, I see in your bio here you had Florida State University. There was a pressure campaign to try to get rid of the term Seminoles, but the Seminole tribes said, no, we're honored by that. And so it is strange to see this and in many cases it's not being done by some people within the Indian groups. It's being done, as you

point out, people who are pushing this Wokism. I refer to it as Marxism because it really is the same type of tactic that the Marxist used. Shi Van Fleet's been very good about saying, you know, this is exactly what they were doing in China. You know, it doesn't have anything to do with slavery or different indigenous people groups. This is just a tactic that

they use. So let's talk a little bit about your book Not Stolen, because that is one of the key things identifying people as colonizers, implying that we're thieves descendants of thieves, and therefore all of this stuff has to be eradicated, rewritten, and reallocated with reparations and that type of thing. Talk a little bit about that book Not Stolen, Truth about European colonialism in the New World. Well, you know what, I totally agree with you that

this is originally a Marxist idea. It's a very nineteenth century idea of society works that says there's only two groups, oppressor and oppressed. And so they come up with the idea that if you're the colonizer. You were always the oppressor, You're always bad. If you were the colonized, then you're always

innocent, you always do everything right. And again, we got rid of this idea in the history profession after the nineteen sixties and seventies, after the hippie movement died down, we got some sense and we realized that reality is multifaceted. It's not always a versus b So what we see now with social media is a resurgence of this simplistic nineteenth century Marxist idea where instead of the bourgeoisie in the proletariat, it's the Europeans and indigenous people, or it's white

people and black people, or men and women. And so what they're trying to do is rewrite history, to take out all the cases where Europeans were good, were decent, we're noble, were moral, where they were trying to help the Native Americans. They also try to erase all the times when Native Americans were nasty to each other, genocidal or slavery, all that stuff.

And so the premise of the book is to say, let's turn the clock back to the nineteen nineties or the early two thousands, when historians had a balanced view of Europeans in Native Americans, there were saints and sinners on both sides. But now, since the rise of BLM, I suppose we're not allowed to say anything good about Europeans or anything bad about natives. And that's frankly completely unscientific. No historians should support that. And of course,

kind of similar to all of that was the sixteen nineteen project. I'm sure that's a core part of your book addressing that. Yeah, absolutely well. I mean they say in the opening paragraphs, we want to rewrite American history to put slavery as the fulcrum around which all of American history revolves. And again, any historian worth their salt knows history has multiple causes and effect there's

no one thing around which everything revolved. So it's an ideological project. It's trying to create a discord where there used to be consensus, and it's frankly kind of a resurgence of nineteen sixties black pantherism. It's that kind of Marxism, and it has no place in a modern scientific field. And of course the weather underground. At the same time, Bill Ayers and his people started talking about white skin privilege. They didn't invent it, but they started popularizing

it. And then he after he stopped bombing buildings, he started bombing minds in the educational system with the idea of white privilege. But yeah, it was all really kind of a Marxist tactic because they realized that it wasn't working to talk about people. The Americans believe that they had economic mobility, and so the kind of class warfare based on economic classes that they used in Europe wasn't working here. So they had to do something along the lines of racial

division and conflict. Right. Well, I mean, if you look, black families in America have on average been more and more wealthy every decade, and then we have the election of a black president in two thousand and eight, and I think the left started running scared, and they said, unless we create a new narrative and new division, black people and white people are actually going to get along and everybody's going to, you know, help create

a better American society. That was like their worst nightmare. Yeah, and so they'd come back with his nineteen sixty seventy stuff. Yes, yes, And so you know, when you talk about this, are you focused, are you focused on the US predominantly, or do you also look at the implications as they're being used in the UK because they're also tearing down statues they're

based on slavery because the UK was central to the slave trade. Of course, no credit is given to those people who stopped the slave trade and then the UK, you know, basically paid stopped slavery by paying off the plantation owners. They don't talk about that aspect of it. Of course, it is very it is very transparently one sided in their discussion of all of it. But give us an idea of the scope of your book. Yeah, well, I mean I have become a professor of global history here in the

Netherlands. They're a small country and they think about the world at large, and so I was an historian of the Spanish Empire, but I also knew a lot about more recent economic history. So I just started taking on these

big picture ideas, you know. So the book covers five hundred years of European colonialism and contact with the natives, and it also talks about Latin America a little bit Mexico, but also North America, so the United States and Canada, with a real focus on the US but I start out with the beginning of European colonialism with the Spanish, because there's so many things people think about Columbus, they think about the Aztecs and Quartes, and there's so many

stereotypes that people have been told which are frankly just plain wrong. Most of the people in the New World actually lived in Mexico or in the Incan Empire. There were very few in North America. And when you look to date, most of the population of Mexico, eighty percent of them are mixed Spanish and Indigenous. Very few people are actually European, you know, full blooded Europeans. So if the Spanish were trying to commit genocide or move the natives

out of the way, they did a terrible job. And in North America there were so few people that by eighteen twenty, European settlers outnumbered the natives one hundred to one. Wow, which is what we still see today. So these ideas of genocide and settler colonialism need to be addressed by looking at

the bigger picture. Yes, yes, talk a little bit about the sixteen nineteen project because one of the things that really concerns me, and that date I think was picked to try to preempt the American tradition of the Mayflower in sixteen twenty. So we're going to erase that, and we're going to make this all about slavery. And of course this is something that the Marxists have been focused on extensively, especially at Harvard. Pete I call him Booty Gay.

But his mentor there, Saka Van Brukovich at Harvard, was always about deconstructing everything in terms of how Puritans and Protestant America had ruined everything. So that was his kind of his worldview, his lens of everything, that he would deconstruct everything by taking it back to those roots, those evil roots. And so it seems to me like that was a part of it as well. But for the early decades the how do you see this? They dismissed it as a myth. I think that maybe it's not, but I'd like

to know your opinion as a historian. The fact that the early Pilgrims who went to from the Mayflower to that area seemed to get along for several generations with the Indians that were there for the most part, What do you she to imagine that? Yeah? So, I mean the idea is originally to discredit capitalism by saying that the roots of capitalism in America were based on slavery, which has now been thoroughly debunked by economic historians. But most historians today

aren't trained in economics, so they can't even really read that literature. And that's real important because that's what the basis of the reparation stuff as well. So you get into the numbers and the figures in your book. Yeah yeah, so, I mean that's the thing. I can actually come up with numbers and figures, which most of my colleagues are happy to breeze over and or they their head spin if they even think about them talking about racism and

getting along. For the first couple of centuries, I mean, all the way up till the end of the seventeen hundreds, most Europeans believed that Native Americans were quote born white. And this may sound a little weird, but they actually thought they were the same race as Europeans because they were from the same latitude. So they didn't think skin color was based on race back then, they thought it was based on where you lived in relation to the to

the sun or to the equator. So they actually thought Native Americans were the same racism, and they didn't even use the term red man until after eighteen hundred. So the idea that their hatred of natives was based on racism is completely fallacious. There's just absolutely no truth to it at all. They thought we were all descended from Adam and Yan, and you see so many sources that say these people are just as clever as we are. The only difference

is our technology level. Yes, yes, and that really is say, descended from Adam and Eve. I've mentioned that many times. Is I've heard it said, you know, from a Christian perspective, there's only one race, that's human race. The only difference is the direction that we're racing. And the Christians was say, are you racing toward God or away from God? And the skin color doesn't really matter, So that is it's interesting that

that Christian perspective has been there for many, many centuries. It's nothing new, absolutely yeah. And so you know, there there were some scruffs on one side of the other. You had King Phillips War after several decades and some other things like that. But these are the types of things that you know happen, and it's you know, happened within different European groups. Same

groups will go to war with each other. You have civil wars, you have wars between different groups, you have recrimination because of somebody committing a crime in one community or the other. That type of thing would happen, but it had been peacefully adjudicated and it was not the kind of the environment that has been depicted in sixteen nineteen. Talk to us a little bit about the economics without I know that you know, we don't have the paper in front

of us to look at the numbers. But talk a little bit about the economics aspect of that, because that's very important in terms of the reparations thing that is being passed around. Of course, money being added to grievances. That's going to be a very powerful political tool for them to wield. So talk a little bit about reparations. Yeah. Well, I mean, first of all, you need to think about numbers and how many Native Americans there

actually were, how many were being wrongs. You see major websites saying, for example, that Columbus killed seven million people in Hispaniola, the little island where he first landed. But they recently did a genetic study and found that there were only thirty thousand people living there when Columbus arrived. I mean, so that's the kind of crazy numbers that we're seeing. So you can imagine that any other economic figures, any kind of numbers at all, are very

difficult to pin down. If we can't even get the population figure right. We see claims for reparations, you know, against some of the universities in the Midwest, things like that coming up today, and the real question is how much was that land actually work. So in the nineteenth century, most native tribes were still in the Midwest anyway, were hunter gatherers, and so there might only be a couple thousand people living in an entire modern state.

That's you know, hunting and gathering does not produce many calories per acre at all. So once she turned to farming, as Thomas Jefferson said, these people now only need about one to one thousandth as much land to farm as they used to need to hunt. And natives themselves started using firearms, they started living near the settlers because they were a source of gunpowder, firearms, iron tools, things like that, and then the natives themselves helped deplete the

game. So sooner or later, they were going to have to turn to farming, and then the land, once you farm, it becomes much more valuable, it's much more productive. And then the white settlers start building roads which connects it to the ports, which creates more value in the land.

So if people are claiming value for land today, it's been developed for two hundred years two hundred years ago, it was literally an de scrubble, a couple deer on it, and a lot of times those payments have already been made and settled in court years ago, and of course people just bring them up again because it's basically a free hand though, and it was very disrupting.

They started deconstructing some of those things in Oklahoma and created a great deal of unrest and uncertainty, And of course we're just talking about reparations from the

Indian side as well. But that's fascinating the fact that when you look at the scale of the people that were here, as you mentioned with Columbus and with other issues, maybe that's one of the reasons why they want to shut down these Indian museums so they can stop actually finding out the real scientific information about the population that was there and how extensive it was and what was happening there, Maybe shut that down and tell some happy stories from a different political

perspective. Maybe that's the motivation. Huh oh, I'm afraid so. I think there are some groups who really do want to shut down the history and erase that history because it doesn't go with their own narratives in the current day, which would entitle them to more handouts. They don't want you to know their tribe was only in a given area for one hundred years before the white men arrived, that they had picked out several other tribes before they arrived.

I mean, history is a lot more complicated than they want you to think. That's right, And you know, it's portrayed in a very simplistic way that the only conflict is between white Europeans and the American Indians that were there, and yet they had a great deal of conflict with each other as well. They had slavery internally with each other, as did every society. And that's why I mentioned you know, when you talk about not stolen, you

know slavery in term. It's a global situation. So it's a common thing throughout human history, but it's always portrayed as something that is uniquely European, and that's what these people are portraying it as in order to get reparations. Absolutely, and I mean so every Thanksgiving, you see all of these articles appear online that mentioned King William's war, that mentioned a couple of massacres.

But as you pointed out, there were often decades in between these wars between Europeans and natives, and the Europeans were living in scattered houses all amongst the natives. Clearly, that's because for generations they had no trouble with them at all. So you know, everyone was trusting each other, everyone was living with each other. So the idea that there was a constant warfare that Europeans

were taking slaves was not the case. Meanwhile, in Massachusetts, many tribes thanked the Puritans for imposing a peace in a huge swath of eastern Massachusetts, which they said, a piece of the likes of which we have never known already within ten years, that's what the Indians were saying to the colonists, thank you for imposing this peace, because they used to enslave each other.

So they were constantly of war, constantly in danger of being slaughtered or enslaved, and of course, it's that kind of tribalism that they our current government is trying to re establish. You know, for the longest time we had that commonality. The people who were settling it there, they saw everybody as descended from Adam and Eve, all as created by God, all as human

beings, and so it was that commonality. As they said in the Mayfire Compact, part of the reason that they wanted to come to a new land was to spread Christianity, and that was part of the Christian ethic that is so despised was the fact that they wanted to bring out the commonality in people rather than focus on tribal differences and those kinds of tribal differences as they emphasize that now, that's going to take us back into a conflict that was already

there in so many different ways. Talk a little bit about colonialism and slavery and other areas besides America. Yeah, well, I mean, what most people don't realize is that the Aztecs were a huge slave drivers. Not only that, but then when they enslaved people, they often brought them as part of the human sacrifice machine. Their religion was based on. They're saying, maybe twenty or thirty thousand human sacrifices at the Aztec capital per year. Wow.

There is suspicions that these people were used for protein because they had killed off all the megafauna when they first arrived, so there weren't many large animals, so maybe this is what was going on. But anyway, there were huge slave networks all across Mexico. When Cortes first arrived, he was gifted twenty women by a local chief. These women had basically been used as slaves and had been trafficked from across Mexico, and so Cortes was encountering vestiges of

this thriving slave market when he first arrived. That was just part and parcel the way the world worked down there. And how did they react to that? Did he what did he do with those slaves? Did he continue in that tradition or well? That's the wild thing about Cortes is he one of these women turned out to be exceptionally bright and a charismatic leader, and he used her as an interpreter for the Aztec court. It turned out she had

been raised as a noble woman and her name is Marina. Cortes took her as his mistress and had a son by her, who he later ennobled. The pope actually gave him the title of duke, and so he was raised, even though he was a Mestiza, to this great glory, and Marina basically helped Cortes conquer the Aztec Empire, as did tens of thousands of other

native warriors who made the bulk of Cortes's army. So the Spanish then imposed something nobody ever talks about, which is a Pax Hispanica on all of Mexico. These tribes were not fighting each other. Now for the first time in history, they weren't enslaving each other, they weren't sacrificing each other. And so the quality of life for the average person once they survived the diseases that the Spanish accidentally brought, then the quality of life for them increased dramatically.

And so what was as a pax a piece that they imposed across that Mexico And it was. But when how is this portrayed by the left differently? Yeah? Yeah, I mean the Left doesn't want to talk about that at all. Right, so they'll say, oh, one hundred thousand people died in Cortez is worse. They want to leave it at that. If you google it, it'll say eight million people were killed in Cortes is worse.

That is highly contentious, and at least ninety percent of those if of people who did die, died of disease, which again in the seventeenth century nobody

could control over the sixteenth century. So the left will completely ignore the fact that the human sacrifice was stopped, that the tribal warfare was stopped, that there had been forced removals and genocides that no longer occurred, and frankly, anything they don't want to hear, such as in the nineteenth century the United States introduced smallpox vaccines to Native Americans, saving tens of thousands of lives. All those facts just kind of go unmentioned, shall we say, by my

colleagues. That's interesting, And so we look at it in terms of reparations. Is there a reparations movement outside of America or is this something that is really kind of spearheaded by the American Marxists. Are they using this for political

purposes elsewhere throughout Central and South America. Well, you know, it really started with the kind of New Black Panther movement, the sort of BLM movement, and around twenty sixteen they started calling Bernie Sanders a racist for refusing to support reparation, I mean, all these crazy things, and it really spread from there. So the British are getting some of this from former members of

the British Empire where the British were involved in the slave trade. And then indigenous groups across the world have have gotten on the bandwagon, if you will, because they realized there's political win behind these sales for reparations. But they still mostly come from the African Pan African slavery movement. Now, remember ninety percent of the slaves coming to the New World did not go to the United States. They went to Brazil and other places. But in Latin America people

are still a little bit more chilled out. They realized that Columbus is kind of you know, they're Mestizo. A lot of these people are mixed European and Native. They see Columbus as one of the fathers of their race and also their native ancestors, the other fathers of their race, and so they're not quite into this reparations idea as we are in Western Europe in the US, so they're not tearing down a Columbus statues like they're trying to do,

not as much. That's interesting. So when you look at this from a standpoint of reparations, again, I think probably the information that you have bringing truth to the size of the population, the economics that are involved there, I think that is going to be a key for people in terms of takeaway from your book. I think that's probably one of the most important things that people could get from. What are the other lessons that you would suggest that

people can learn from your book? Yeah, well, I mean pretty much any of the stereotypes that you hear about stolen land for example, or about genocide for example, or even the trail of tears. These are things that we used to have a balance scientific idea about which now you're only allowed to believe one extreme version of what happened. So, you know, for the first two hundred years, the Europeans in North America were very content to just

stay along the coast and have trading forts. I mean, they made a proclamation line in seventeen sixty three which basically said, no one's going to settle west of this. Ever, they thought the Native Americans were going to be in control of ninety percent of the continent in perpetuity. So the idea that the Europeans arrived with the idea of stealing the land is totally wrong. They actually there was a huge real estate market, thriving real estate market where Natives

would sell land and get gunpowder and tools, you know. So people forget this stuff all the time, even the Trail of Tears. It was one of the most shameful episodes in American history. Sixty thousand Natives were removed to Oklahoma from the Southeast. But even then, the US Supreme Court said that this removal was illegal and ordered Jackson not to do it, you know. And so people are saying, oh, the US is this genocidal country.

Look at the Trail of Tears. The US Supreme Court itself forbade this to happen, and many members of Congress protested. Some Davy Crockett was a congressman. He actually resigned in protest at the removals. Intellectuals and the public were in a huge uproar. Martin Van Buren, who was the Vice president, said, Wow, this was the biggest public uproar we've ever seen in the

United States against any political action. So that says to me, there's a lot of good in the American society, even in the eighteen thirties, goodwill towards the Native Americans that my colleagues are absolutely refusing to acknowledge. I mean, there's a book out called Surviving Genocide about the Trail of Tears, and they're pretending that it was a genocidal movement. It was not uniformly approved by

any means. And I talked about that many times when talking about the Supreme Court, I might say, well, Supreme Court made a decision, that's done. He said no, you know, Jackson said, well you made your decisionless, see you when forcing me what you wanted to do, right. And the interesting thing about that is that the Supreme Court at first said well you can do it. Then when they saw it and in practice, they changed their mind within about a year i think it was, and said

no, you can't do that. And so as you point out, you know, it is there's a very simplistic notion that is being sold to people. That's the basis of all of this, you know, Project sixteen nineteen, all the rest of this stuff. They want to paint everybody and these very simplistic stereotypes. It's kind of ironic because they're always complaining about stereotypes, and yet they're creating their own stereotypes out of all this, aren't they Absolutely

Yeah, it's ridiculous. I mean, they're pretending that the settlers and natives never gone along. But you open up any source and you see they're all camping out in the same village together for weeks and months on end, obviously trading with each other, communicating with each other most of the time, getting along very well. So even stereotypes as simple as that. Yes, and I can't remember all the details now, it seems like there was something about

what kicked off all of this stuff. Were some complaints, but locally I think there was. Wasn't it somebody who was selling them bibles and was a friend of theirs or something that was trying to intervene at the beginning of the Cherokees being removed as a history you probably know more details about that than I do. What was it they kicked that off? It seems like even at the very beginning, and even at the local level before it went up to

Washington, there was a lot of movement and support of the Cherokees. There locally from the Europeans. Oh yeah, well, there were several missionaries who had gone down there. They had taught the Cherokees how to read and write, They helped them create their own alphabet, they set up a newspaper. Samuel Worcester was one of the missionaries whose case was later brought to the Supreme Court against the removal. So, I mean he was instrumental in helping to

bring the Supreme Court case. And then for generations afterwards, there were people who went along with the natives to Oklahoma to help make sure the soldiers weren't too mean to them, to help them set up stores. And you know, even Jackson, even his officials were thinking, because gold had just been discovered in Georgia, they were thinking that they really ought to remove the natives for their own good, because there were so many squatters moving onto their land

that nobody could properly control. I mean, this was frontier territory. The Natives were outnumbered maybe fifty to one by this point. And so there's even arguments, some historians have made this in good faith, that this was actually the best thing to move them beyond the borders of the United States at the time. So again, we see lots of countervailing logic and reasons happening on the ground that you really need to understand the historical sources before you can judge.

Yeah. Yeah, And of course there was a lot of interconnection in many different ways. You know, the Cherokee got along very well with the Europeans in general. I don't think there was it wasn't really any violent conflict. I don't think there was a lot of intermarriage. There was a lot of cultural exchange, religious exchange. When it came time a few decades later, about thirty years later, when the Civil War happened, Cherokee were supportive.

Of course, they didn't like the fact that the federal government had removed him. I'm sure that had something to do with it. But there were close ties to the people in the area between the Cherokee, didn't they It seems like they. I don't recall any conflicts like you would see in some other areas out west. Yeah. Well, I mean the fact is half of the Cherokee leadership, a lot of the major players, such as Major Ridge, were at this point half Cherokee, half European. There was a

Native American practice of adopting people into your tribe. So most of the leaders were part of European Many of them had been educated back east. There were some Indian schools that had been set up by missionaries for the idea of making them literate so that natives could support themselves and make legal arguments in Washington, So there was actually a major Ridge himself had actually fought with Jackson in a previous campaign against the Seminoles, so they all knew each other, these elites,

so the native elites and European elite. Many of the natives didn't even want to go with the tribe because they already owned land outside of tribal land. They were already running farmsteads and other businesses. So there was so much interaction on the ground, intermarriage on the ground. People knew what was coming for years before the removals, so this was no surprise. The tribes who

did get removed knew what they were signing up for. They had all been offered farms instead of removal, which they refused, you know, and that was done on a political vote. So I mean, when you know the details, it's once again a lot more complicated and messy. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, I've I've talked to many times about it, mainly from the Supreme Court standpoint, and a little bit about you. I knew a little bit about the missionaries and their connection to them. I did not know

that there were Europeans who accompanied them out there. What was the basis though that began was a justification for removal? Where did that all come from? Yeah, well, I mean even as late as as Jefferson's presidency, even a little bit after that, the idea was that the natives in the Southeast had been granted this land. It was because the land was granted by US

property right. They were not ever going to be removed. And so this is one of the reasons why there was so much outrage when Jackson started this process to actually remove these natives beyond Mississippi. And that's why the Supreme Court was willing to stand up for their property rights. I mean, so the idea had long been, all right, they can't be hunter gatherers anymore.

Let's give them title to land, and this will protect them. And I think the real outrage that Davy Crockett had was that, look, these people now own title to land. We can't just transfer human beings off their own property. And that's what caused a lot of the real fight and what was a justification that the people were trying to remove them from, what was their justification for taking them on plants had the treaty in it, it became politically

expedient to do this after the gold rush in the southeast. So I mean there were a couple of us Mints that minted only gold coins I think at Delona, Georgia, and Charlotte, I think in North Carolina, And so once gold was discovered there, there was a huge rush of settlement into that land. There were skirmishes. If the Indians retaliated, they'd get massacred by you know, twenty times as many white people as they had warriors. And

meanwhile, the natives had actually been starting to increase in numbers. They were actually doing well on their lends there. And so the Jackson was partially elected on the idea that he was going to free up this land for settlement by whites, even though the federal government disapproved, and almost every northern Neer disapproved at the time. So it's basically we found gold, and so we got

to rethink this screen. Yeah what was going on? Yeah, well that's interesting but as you point out, you know, even though the origins of it, the basis of it was bad, you had people on both sides

and people who were allies for doing the right thing. And I think it is as an important thing for us to understand the reality of history that it's complex, it's not one dimensional, it's not very simple minded as people who are propagandists wanted to present it. And we've had very simple minded versions of history in the past that went the other direction, off the other direction, and now we're getting a very simple minded direction of history. So it's good

to have books like yours that put the things in context. There's going to be good and bad people on both sides. There's good and bad in every person, and so of course they're going to have good actions and bad actions on both sides of this. It's very interesting, especially Jeff in this area. I live in this area of you know, the Gatlinburg area and that

type of thing. So the Cherokee thing is something that I find to be very interesting, especially since the connections to the Europeans seemed to be so strong, and the injustice at the same time was also there. But as you point out, there are people on both sides. Davey Crockett and other people in the Supreme Court who tried to stop this at that time, give us an idea. We've got a little bit more time here. Give us a little idea of Canada, for example, what was happening there now? Is

there any push for reparations in Canada? I would imagine with the Liberal government they're trying to find something there. But it was there a great deal of conflict in Canada. Well, I mean, so, yeah, let's just say with the Liberal government in Canada, in the last few years, the reparations movement has really gone into overdrive. An enormous amount of Canadian federal money has gone towards the tribes in recent years. They're saying that the tribal budget

is growing faster than the Canadian military budget. And so, but the question is is this money well spent, Is it actually helping people or is it just going to a few elites and often to white people, like maybe some of the lawyers who are representing the natives. And so there's a real question of whether this money and these reparations are actually going to alleviate poverty. There's

also the question of government handouts in general. Is it a good thing to encourage people to give them a stipend every year or would it be better to encourage them to go get educated and get out there and make something of themselves. And then this is based on some of these perceived injustices. In Canada. The main perceived injustice was the residential schools which were going right up to the nineteen seventies nineteen eighties, where Natives kids were taken off the reservation and

taught at a Canadian school. They were given Christian education. This of course is highly a taboo for some people, but when you look back at the administrators of these schools, there were things that were ineptly done. There were times when disease broke out at the school, because just like in any school in the year nineteen hundred, you're going to have diseases breakout. But most

of the people running the schools thought they were doing good. They said, I'm taking an illiterate kid, I'm giving them skills, I'm teaching them to be a carpenter, I'm teaching them to sew, and we're going to help them assimilate into Canadian society. So the intention, I think was pretty much good and noble, even if in the execution it was a little bit in

nineteenth century sometimes. But when you look at the number of Canadian natives who were massacred by European Canadians, the most they can come up with it is about two dozen. So the idea that you know, Canadian natives were massacred by Europeans is totally ridiculous. So they say, oh, well, maybe we didn't commit genocide here, but we committed cultural genocide. And they used the residential schools as an example of cultural genocide. In the book, I

talk about how that's all been taken much too far as well. Oh yeah, yeah, there was a lot of that about a year or so ago, and a lot of their narrative about what was happening in the schools was debunked, and I'm sure you address that in your book as well. Really took that to an extreme, resulted in a great deal of people feeling they were justified to de face and destroy church property and things like that. And

I am concerned about the reservation system when we look at that. I see that as if we don't learn a lesson from that, I see that as a pattern that could be utilized in smart cities and that type of thing. You know, there is an effort again to try to remove people from their land and to lock us up in cities. They've actually had a plan for that globally that we should all be worried about. And I guess you're saying that they're in the Netherlands as well. You're in the Netherlands, right right,

Yeah? I am. Yeah. I mean partially because I had to leave the United States because if I didn't do my research on DEI related topics, they were going to hire me. So in some ways I've had to come to exile in Europe. Wow. That is something, isn't it. You have to have an intellectual exile in order to be able to do history. Yeah, but that's really where we are now. Thank you so much for joining us. Has been a fascinating discussion. The book is Not Stolen

The Truth about European Colonialism in the New World. Jeff Finn Paul is the author. Jeff, where can people find this Amazon or do you have a website that you saw drying? Yah? It's definitely on Amazon and other major booksellers as well. Okay, And I think you know, if you look it up, not stolen. You'll probably that'll be the easiest way to find you'll see the rest of the subtext there. Thank you so much for joining us. It was great to talk to you. And it's very important.

If we don't understand what history is, that's one of the reasons why they want to eradicate it, because then we are basically putty in their hands. It all repeats or rhymes in one way or the other. Thank you so much, Jeff I appreciated. Thanks great. All right, Well we're going to be right back, folks, stay with us making sense. Comment again.

You're listening to the David Night Show, all right, And we got a couple of comments at North American House opposed from Canada says billions of dollars spent on Canadian Indian reservations and there's still third world hell holes with no clean water, no indoor plumbing. Yes, and and a lot of that is, you know, in the American reservation system at least, it's because you have very corrupt tribal government, some bureaucrats who are empowered to run this thing.

They take away property rights from people and they're not you know, it is a very tightly controlled system, which I think in many ways is what they're trying to create a higher tech version of with the smart cities and high boost says. They canceled the Redskins, they canceled the Land of Lakes girls, et cetera. Yeah, it's and that's the worst part of it.

You know, we look at the chiefs or or things like those Redskins, Well we got we got to cancel that, and it's not tied to any particular Indian and Indian tribe, and so you know, they're basically able to do what they wish. But I don't know what was wrong with the Land of Lakes girl, I don't it was again, it's insanity. But thank you for the tip, YJ. Seventy two. I appreciate that. So it's good to have you back today. David. Praying for your health.

I appreciate that very much. Thank you. I do appreciate your prayers for that. Let's talk a little bit about what's coming up in terms of the Super Bowl. This interesting statement done by the quarterback, and I want to contrast that to something from an actor. I'm not going to try to pronounce his name. Can you pull up the article and this is the guy who's traumatized by negative reviews for Marvel's Eternals. The Eternal movie was a DEI festival

and it was sold that way. Nobody liked it, nobody wanted to talk about it. But he was so traumatized by the negative reviews that this actor says, I still talk to my therapist about it. And I thought that was very interesting and as a counterpart to as everybody's talking to the Super Bowl quarterback players how they deal with things. And there was an interview with a quarterback for the forty nine ers, brock Purty, and what he said was

exactly the opposite. But let me give you what this particular actor said. He played the superhero King Go in the Marvel release. He says, it was really really hard because Marvel thought that movie was going to be really really well received. And scroll up to the top. People can see the picture of him there he is there is okay, so that's what he looks like, he said. So they lifted the embargo really early, and they put it in some fancy movie festivals, and they sent us on a big global

tour promoting the movie. Right as the embargo lifted. The reviews were bad, and I was too aware of it. I was reading every review and checking it too much, he said. In this article from Breitbart, they point out that Disney promoted it by emphasizing the diverse casting they made. The movie was all about Dei and so it was a massive failure. And it also as part of that, it had Marvel's first gay on screen kiss between two men. So audience has hated it, critics hated it. Everybody hated

it, and he says, I thought it was unfair to me. It's unfair to my wife, Emily. I can't approach my work this way anymore. He says, something's got to change, very intentionally. So I started counseling and I still talk to my therapist about that. Emily, his wife, says that I do have trauma from it. Emily and I just got dinner with somebody else from that movie, and we were like, that was

tough, wasn't it. And he's like, yeah, that was really tough, And I think we all went through something kind of similar, and that kind of gives you an insight into why these people who are rich and famous in Hollywood are so paranoid about all this. Yeah, they live by their most recent movie, and they're very afraid of losing their status, even if

it's somebody like this guy who didn't have any status. For status contrasts that to this quarterback of the forty nine ers who was the very last draft pick. And they have kind of a joke tradition where the very final draft pick

is two hundred and sixty something. People are picked every year for the NFL, and the very last one has celebrated is mister irrelevant and the person who started it, who did it as a joke with the NFL, they have a jersey that is the team that picked that person, and they take them to the place of their choice and they celebrate. And Brock Purdy was the very last one. And his story is almost kind of like the movie Rudy

in a sense I looked at it. His NFL career began as he was the two hundred and sixty second pick in the twenty twenty two NFL draft. But now he's becoming VP candidate. He's a starting quarterback for a team that is headed to the super Bowl. So from mister irrelevant to mister super I guess mister incredible, he said, but he had a very different perspective on this, he said, for me playing this game, playing this sport, he said, there's a lot that goes into it. And he says,

it's easy to get wrapped up and wanting to be loved. He said, that's what this guy who was the actor for the Marvel movie didn't, you know, feeling the same thing. He says, you want to be loved obviously by your teammates, by everybody, but also the world. He says for me in that passage, and he talked about the twenty third psalm, the Lord is my Shepherd, I shall not want, he says for me in that passage. It's saying I already have what I need from the good

Shepherd Jesus. And so you know, when you look at this, he said, during the games, he's praying, but he's not praying for victory on the field. He's just praying to have peace, to have steadfastness and all of that chaos, he said, just to have that even keeled state of mind that I get from the Holy Spirit, he said. And it's a very different perspective, isn't He says, I've never tried to hold on the football life very tightly. He says, I've held it pretty loosely and

see what God has in store. He says, I've stayed faithful to him and He's taken me to places that I could never have imagined. I think that applies to all of us. You know. When I look at this and I get back and forth with the stuff about Trump and the maga people who are worshiping him, ignoring his background, all the rest of it. What motivates me out of this and what gets me really angry that I have to watch out for is not that I'm not being liked. It's not that

I'm getting a lot of hate from these people. But I just hate to see people taken advantage of I hate to see the sheep follow their bad shepherd over the and at the same time push a lot of other people over the cliff along with them. And that's really what is going on, and that's

really what bothers me. I have to pull back and say, you know, I just need to I need to be calm during this chaos and calm during this and understand that My perspective on this is that other watchmen on the wall, that you have to warn people if you see something that is there, and you don't warn people about it, their blood is on your head. But if you tell people and they won't do anything about it, then that is on their head. And that's how I have to look at it.

But again, I thought it was a real striking contrast between two very different worldviews, one of them very temporary, very secular. And the Corbett Report has a a piece that was picked up by a Free Thought Project twenty twenty four in the Pursuit of Happiness, and in it he talks about how, you know, we look at the news now twenty four He lists them, you know, the digital id CBDC, the Great Reset, the scamdemic treaty, the Great War, a poly crisis, and all the rest of

them. We could go on and on. There's many others, right, we could start talking about what they want to do a climate and many other things like that. And he said, you know, what what does it mean to pursue happiness? And he says, you know, we have to understand first of all that you know, and it's a we don't have time to unpack this because the show's about Then many people go back and look at

what the founders were talking about in terms of happiness. They were not talking about hedonism, they were not talking about comfort, They were talking about the pursuit of virtue. But we also need to look at it from the standpoint of this contrast between the actor, the Disney actor and the Christian quarterback, when it is happiness and peace and calm is not really based on what happens

to you. You know, a lot of bad stuff is happened to brock Purty before he got to Everybody say, oh, well, he's going to the super Bowl as a successful quarterback, but he's gone through a lot of things that were not good for him. We all do, and so happiness is more happiness is, basically the way that we talk about it today,

is what happens to you. And if it's just what happens to you, then you are a victim or a potential victim of happenstance, because both good and bad things are going to happen to you that you don't have any control over. But if you're anchored to something else, as brock pretty want, then that gives you, as I've said many times a lover, an anchorage outside of this life, this time, and outside of your circumstances and that

is why Christians don't talk about happiness, even the purserative virtue. Christians talk about a joy, a joy that is not part of the second the moment that we live in. That's secularism. Thank you for joining us the common man. They created common Core and dumbed down our children. They created common past track and control us. They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated

ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for

listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com. If you like the Eagles on Highway, the cars, and Healey Lewis in the news, they say the horrors, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download our app, or listen now at APS radio dot com.