6Sep23 Pentagon AI to Censor in Real-Time as Pre-Crime Speech

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show. As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Wednesday, the sixth of September. Here of our Lord, two thousand twenty three. Well, today we're going to begin by taking a look at special forces they now have. The Pentagon is now using artificial intelligence to try to stop any new information, anything that would go against their narrative in the launching stage, just like you want to take

down a nuclear missile in the launching stage. That's how serious to take the speech. And of course these weapons of tyranny were always forged by the Pentagon, by DARPA and others. Well, also take a look at what is going on with the ad L and Musk the history of censorship. There. We have this new podcast called the Eternals, and they're going to tell you

how to get eternal life. You take blood from other people. It may get harder and harder for them to find that blood as they're contaminating it with the mr Anda vaccines. And of course we're look at more Trump two point zero. He's now talking about the vaccines. We'll be right back. Yeah, we're also going to have in the third Hour, an economist who is

the rated by JOHNS. Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics. They placed him third among influencers on economic matters with the greatest global impact in Latin America, Spain, in the United States. If you want to know what's going on in this election that we you know in Argentina, surprise everybody, They said, look at this guys, he's kind of a rampaul libertarian, very libertarian economics. And but of course even when the Wall Street Journal reports on it,

they didn't want to talk about its economic policy. Because this guy we're going to be talking to has written a book called The Street Economist, the best selling book in Chile, Spain, and many many other Latin American countries. I suspect in Argentina as well, if they're going to elect somebody like this, it's having a big influence. And he talks about economics, socialism and other things like that. But you know, with a Wall Street Journal covers

that election, they don't want to talk about his economics. They don't want to talk about contrasting market economics with socialism. Instead they talked about his hair. His hair, and so we want to take a look and get an idea of what is really on his mind, and even more importantly, to make sure that we understand ourselves and that our children understand the difference between socialism and true economic freedom. So he's going to be our guest in the third

hour. Let's begin with this weaponized propaganda from the Pentagon. You know, for the longest time, I've talked about how the Internet was the brainchild of DARPA, a DARPA psychologist just in case, you know, understood what the Internet was really about, and J. C. R. Licklider when it became a popular in the nineteen ninety became possible in the nineteen nineties to have a high enough speed that you could start to get things practically on the Internet.

And it was you know, as this was beginning, you had DARPA, you had the CIA openly come out with the venture capital firm, but you had all these different intelligence agencies NSA, the rest of them had people on venture capital boards. CIA had its own creating the companies that were going to rule the Internet and setting these guys up. You know, let's find people that are going to work with us, and then we'll let them compete with each other. So the best man wins, and we got the strongest

case here. And so that's when you had the birth of Facebook. As they shut down total information awareness, everybody said that's creepy. The next day they opened up Facebook. And it was always a trap. There was always a trap. It's all free, come on in, it's all free. Then they close the gates and they start executing our liberties, killing them. And so as we see this happening, it should be no surprise that this is becoming more and more open and they're bragging about it, and they're going

to be using artificial intelligence now to do the censorship. And that's what this is about. And it's really kind of artificial intelligence wedded to anticipatory intel intelligence or intelligent intel. So it's really kind of AI squared, isn't it. Anticipatory intelligence has been there for a very long time. It's part of geospatial intelligence to try to anticipate what people are going to do and shut them down before they do it. So now they're using this for speech AI squared kind

of a pre crime aspect of it. Not a surprise either that the government would be involved in propaganda. You go back one hundred years ago when it was just newspapers and how you tell me what war you want and I'll give it to you. You know. So the newspaper mogul and McRaven, who was head of Special Forces when I was covering the rollout of equipment by Barack Obama to all these different police departments which they had never done before, is

they're weaponizing and militarizing them. Mcgraven said, you know, we have to understand Special Forces has always been about psy ops, not really about kinetic operations. It's not really about people parachuting out of planes or you know, going underwater to blow things up, the underwater demolition teams, and that it's really been more about psy ops. It's about identifying who our enemy is going to be and who our allies are going to be, and then helping and attacking

them appropriately. That's what Special Forces has been and that's what we need to get back to, and that was what was being said about eight years ago openly. And so now US Special Operations Command can now analyze social media data to capture quote emerging narratives quickly generate the information military force it need to stamp out unfriendly trends even as they are still in the process of going viral. That's interesting because this is reported by URT. The American press has not really

picked this up, and there isn't any conspiracy theory here. This is a press release in the company that is doing it for the Pentagon. AI software developer Accrete announced in a press release that it will provide its open source threat detection that's what it calls it, a rugus to the Pentagon to target quote

synthetic media unquote and so called disinformation on social media in real time. It will be used by intelligence analysts and other specialists to predict real time disinformation threats from social media. They're going to anticipate your disinformation and of course they will

take this to the person. They'll take it to the man. They will shut down the independent journalists, they'll shut down independent media organizations claiming that these The CEO said in his press release, I said, I'm when to talk about synthetic media. They're talking about AI generated stuff. But they also have their program where they're going to generate AI stuff, So it's going to be measured, you know, attack countermeasures, counter counter measures, that type of

thing happening here. It really is an information war and it's going to escalate big time. We're gonna have to have our own channels of communication. I can foresee the time when I will be kicked off of all media, all podcasts, everywhere, and presumably if I still have a website, we're gonna

operate that way. But that time is coming. It's only a matter of when it's going to roll out claiming that these things pose a serious start to US national security and civil society, that social media itself is quote an unregulated environment. Can't have anything unregulated. Oh, it'd be like the wild West. I love the Wild West. I love the fact that was unregulated. It was regulated by the people who came together in a posse to protect their

town with a sheriff. That was a regulation that was needed, and that was all that was needed. Yeah, they always demonize the wild West, and I thought, you know, I look at it's like, I honestly don't know what you guys are talking about. It looks great to me anyway. Unregulated environment where adversaries routinely exploit reasoning vulnerabilities. Reasoning vulnerabilities you've had too much to think right reasoning, Well, that means I guess when the government

tells you screwy things that cannot possibly be true. That would be a reasoning vulnerability. As I've said many times before, I don't know exactly how they brought those buildings down, but I know they brought them down. I know a controlled demolition when I see it. I know that two planes are not going to bring down three steel skyscrapers collapsing into their footprint. So I don't know how they did it, and I don't have the powers of investigation to

uncover this. They have the power to kill people who talk about it. They have the power to cover it up. At nine eleven. Rudy Giuliani and Bernard Carrick, who is head of the police department there, they covered that stuff up, and you know, best buddies with Trump now right, Maybe that's why you didn't see all the nine eleven information. But of course they're not going to record that stuff anywhere, what they did. But yeah, you know, when you've got a narrative that can't be true, That's

what I said. I don't know what they did, but I know that what they're telling you is not what happens. It's not possible what they're telling you, So manipulate behavior through the intentional spread of disinformation. That's what they want to do. A version of it called Nebula Social is about. It is said to be marketed to private corporations in order to manage their online reputations and their brand. You see what we're talking about here is the Pentagon and

the government. They're looking at this as their reputation, as their brand. And it's also bigger than that, you know, is how they manipulate us, how they control us. But the corporations will do this as well. And isn't it interesting that all of this stuff comes together, the merger of corporations and governments and how they become ever more like each other, isn't it? Yeah, two headed snake, We believe the market for AI that can

predict and neutralize media is about to explode. He says Pentagon's Defensive Innovation unit, co founded by ex Google CEO Eric Schmidt. This is one of the things I replayed the interview with the guy who wrote about the four Battlegrounds. I wanted to talk to him about artificial intelligence. But of course, you know the four battlegrounds of four battlegrounds that we have with China, and that's what the military industrial complex, which he is a part of, that's what

they're focused on their war with China. And you hear that even when Trump as he's reinventing himself, as you know, at least that's the way the conservative media wants you to see Trump. And now he's finally come around, he finally understands we need to test these vaccines. No, that's not what he said at all. I'm gonna pull what info Wars said about that, what the post millennials said about that, and what Dixon, the candidate who

interviewed him on the podcast said about that. I'm gonna talk about that today. That is absolutely not what Trump did, not at all. They're still lying to you about him. There are still shills for him. It's pathetic what they are doing. And I tell you you know, it's Trump derangement syndrome is what MAGA has big time. Yeah, there's a lot of people on the left deranged about Trump as well, but equally true on the right. And these people know it. It's not the it's not Info Wars and

post millennial and Dixon who have a derangement syndrome. They know exactly what they're doing. It's money and audience, that's what they're doing. But when we look at going back to SHARE's book the Four Battlegrounds, looming large in that book which I read for the interview is Eric Schmitt. He is the one who has reorganized in Pentagon right now. He is the biggest guy in the Pentagon, and it is being organized along the lines of what he wants to

do. So there's going to be a lot of computerized attack against us. Eric Schmitt initially worked with this country a company a Crete, to develop a rugus or argus has written both ways in this article, paying millions of dollars for a five year license to the program designed to, among other things, uncover quote, behavioral anomalies indicative of potentially illicit activity, pre crime, pre crime, potentially illicit activity. Let's find that again. Anticipatory intelligence. They've

been talking about this for a long time. The potentially illicit activities that are too common plus for humans to identify. You're accuser, will be artificial intelligence, and their training children now in school to accept artificial intelligence. It's kind of interesting to see as this curriculum is being rolled out. CBS News to talk to kids at various stages of their education. And the kids in high school are already skeptical of it, but the kids in elementary school are in

awe of it. Now the question is going to be is not all going to remain once they get older. It's very easy to manipulate very young minds, as they know with the LGBT agenda, Oh you're a different gender. Oh okay, well so you know, tell them stories about artificial intelligence. They're going to fall for that hook line and sinkers why the kids need to be protected's while you need to get your kids, your grandkids out of the government schools. Period. It's way beyond that point, way beyond it.

But yeah, they are going to focus on the mind wars. Going back to nineteen eighties, Michael Aquino, this guy that Oprah always you know, spotlighting the occult and other things like that. Oprah Winfrey bought this guy in. He worked for the NSA, fairly high ranking individual the NSA. And he comes in with this little Eddie Munster haircut, you know, bangs and stuff, and he had a temple of Set, which is his Satanic Church competitor, and he had the accouterments on you know, trying to look as

weird as he could. He had his eyebrows you know, twisted and up, you know, like a spock or something. And she brings him in and she says, so here, you know, you're high up in the military and all this kind of stuff, and you're a Satanist. Yes, I'm open Satanists. Well, he wrote a book called Mind Wars back in the nineteen eighties. It's people like him. This is a Satanic agenda,

literally Satanists. This guy's dead now, but he was at the presidio and there was a guy who was a chaplain at the presidio and his grandchild grandson said to him said, that's so mentioned his name. He's got a room that's all black. And the Chaplain's like, what, Yeah, he's got an honest he's seen his room. It's all black. So he goes to the authorities there and they go to his house and yes, in fact, he has a room that is all black, Like, what were you doing

by my grandson. Well, they pressed some charges against him, and guess what. The NSA got him immediately transferred to another state where they couldn't reach him. These people are evil, evil personified the NSA, the CIA evil personified, the people in charge with mind Wars, that's what they're going to be focused on. And so it's not just you know, theoretical, this

is coming everywhere, already rolling out for gaming. Call of Duty. I've talked too many times about how the Pentagon works with Hollywood, and so does the CIA. The CIA actually has had on their website. I haven't looked at it for years now, but they used to have on their website saying, are you a Hollywood writer or director? We have a lot of very interesting scripts that we've written. Would you like to work with us? You

know, we'll give you these scripts for free if you want them. They write then narrative as whereas a lot of this predictive programming and stuff comes from. I mean it's you know, they've written the script and they hand it to people. It's like, oh, that's an interesting idea, let's make a movie around that. And this is predictive programming. And then at the very end, the good guys win, so you don't have to worry about this, right, Well, that's not necessarily the way that it always works

out, is it. We know in the end that God is in control, but what happens in the interim. The good guys don't always win. But so they have these scripts that they offer people. I had a friend who from high school who actually worked in the Pentagon. He actually worked in the department that would allocate military hardware to people if they had a script that was friendly to the military, and so his job was to look through it

and see how the military was portrayed. If it was portrayed in a positive light, yeah, sure, we'll let you use helicopters and film and all these you know, film on aircraft carries all this other kind of stuff. But if you're critical of the military, you're not getting anything. And so you know, offer that carrot to people. Do you think maybe that happens to the gaming community as well, call of duty. I think maybe that

happens to them. They're now going to be playing footsie with the authorities here and monitoring any of the chat that is happening as people play these games, looking for any what they call toxicity. Voice chats and video games have long been a haven for young people who want to blow off steam, writes Alum Bakari at Breitbart, and they sometimes engage in friendly trash talk but the megacorporations that run the biggest franchises don't like that. Or maybe it's their Pentagon buddies.

They're planning to use AI to make video game chats just as sanitized and politically correct as the rest of the world. Activision and Blizzard, the company that owns a blockbuster Call of Duty franchise, plans to deploy an AI tool to monitor the verbal chats of players in real time. Same thing the Pentagon is doing right now, and a monitor you know what you sound social media

in real time and shut you down. They're looking for toxic speech, and so I guess you could say that Call of Duty has answered reported for duty as a sensor right combating toxicity by listening to end game voice chat. Uh, it's using AI to assist the process. Again, the Stasi AI AI will be your accuser being used by governments and corporations as a weapon against us.

The voice moderation tool, they call it tox mod, will be able to identify in real time and enforce against toxic speech including hate speech, to discriminatory language, harassment, and more. And the Lombacari talks about the fact that unlike a band from social media, these people have invested a lot of money and playing the game, and you know, it's you get banned from a video game. It's you know, yeah, it's not like social media that's free. Well, you know, a lot of people invested a lot

of money back in the day advertising on Facebook. You know the guy that eventually went on to do We Build the Wall, he was disabled vet. I think he'd lost three limbs or something, but you know, he'd spent three hundred thousand dollars advertising on Facebook and they just canned him because they didn't like his conservative speech. But there were a lot of people like that. So yeah, it's bottom line, it's a game. But here's the other

part of this that is also interesting. They brag about the fact that they're relying on the Anti Defamation League the ADL to tell them what they need to shut down. It is going to be trained by the Anti Defamation League. They even point that out and their press release how they have consulted with the ADL and these are the types of things that they're going to be looking at. Promotion or sharing of an ideology not allowed to do that on a video

game? Whynot? I mean, what idea oologies are going to be They're going to allow some ideologies, of course, but recruitment or convincing others to join a group or movement, targeted, grooming or convincing vulnerable individuals like children to join a group or a movement. Wait a minute, we're talking about government school here, promoting sharing an ideology, targeting or grooming kids, recruiting them to do this up. I mean this sounds like the LGBT agenda in

schools. No, they're going to be focused on other things that the ADEL will focus them on using they said in their press release, using research from groups like ADL and their current leadership company says, we've developed the category to identify signals that have a high correlation with extremist movements, even if the language itself isn't violence. So for instance, something like let's take this to discord,

that could be a recruiting tactic, so let's shut that down. And this Information and Liberation points out, how nice to have the ADL, which has been teaching school kids for years that only white people can be racist, So nice to have them there to ban speech using AI for people playing video games. And he has an information liberation, He's got a couple of tweets, or he's collected one from Keith Woods, who elected Jonathan Green Black from

the head of the ADL. Why does he get to be the arbiter of free speech online gaming streamer was named Nick Merks punish my Call of Duty for saying that lgbt Q plus political activists should quote leave little children alone. So you see, grooming is okay, but you must not criticize the grooming when it's done by the LGBTQ people. They've completely removed his partnership bundle from war Zone and MW two store ideological warfare. It is, it is what that

is. You know, some people do make a living out of this and they get cut off from that as well, just like some of the people who used to advertise on Facebook. Cording to Call of Duty and the ADL standards, pro LGBT activists must be allowed to groom children to become transgender, but gamers must be banned for saying that it's okay to be white. It

took a screenshot of the ADL's website where it's got their head. They're header at the top and ADL fighting hate for good, and then they said, here's an example of a hate slogan slang term, it's okay to be white. I guess it's loving to say it's not okay to be white? That right? Is that what they're telling you? And the Georgia school district where I mentioned they're using AI curriculum starting as early as kindergarten, CBS News is

talking about it. They talked to some second graders, first graders brother who were programming legos with integrated motors and sensors with the help of AI. Do you think these kids in first grade are really programming it? A six year old said, well, I like that we can build stuff and do stuff we haven't done before. Karen, when she was teaching school, she got

access to a computer that could run Basic. And this was in the late nineteen seventies, and so, you know, I worked whether and we put together a little thing so you could try to teach the basic program this, you know, Basic the programming language, not just you know, basic as an adjective, but as a programming language going way back. And so we tried to get them to program it. She taught them about flow charts. That was about all they were really able to grasp. They really couldn't do

much program Do you think that they're really programming this? They think that they are, but they say, we, you know, I and the artificial intelligence can build stuff. They're not learning to program. What they're learning to do is to trust artificial intelligence. You see at an early age in kindergarten, as I said before, in high school, they gave them. They took this to some of the art students and had them sketch some stuff out. Then they fed that in to an AI image generator to see what it

would do. I said. Some of the students found it helpful, others didn't. Most of them seem to agree that it wasn't real art, that it lacked the physical element. So I guess we start them earlier to trust artificial intelligence. The biggest lesson that Karen taught these kids, it's not programming

really or even flow charting. The lesson she was teaching them was, you know, look at all the ways that this stuff can go wrong, and understand that just because the answer comes out of a computer, garbage in, garbage out, just always remember that that what you put into a computer is going to determine what comes out of it. And that's true of artificial intelligence, even though they're going to try to make you think that's not the case.

It's the ad L that is putting in there what is hateful and toxic, and the AI is simply searching that out to punish it. It's a Pentagon who's putting that in and the AI is searching it out to punish. It's following a program. They programmed it with that hate, with that agenda, with that narrative, and they're going to use it to war against others. So one student told CBS News, got it right. AI is just taking everybody's work and just collating it together or collaging it together. Technically,

it's not original. So that kid understands, But do the other kids who are going to be raised on this from kindergarten? Michael Snyder, the right government censorship of the Internet is here, and of course it has been here from many, many years. It's just now coming out of the closet more and more openly. They're boasting about it every day, you know, And just as medicine said, you know, we're talking about the Pentagon. The

means of defense abroad will become instruments of tyranny at home. It's the military and the government that's using this artificial intelligence and weaponizing it against us, not even against foreign enemies against us. So the Digital Services Act out of Europe, as he's pointing out, this is going to affect all of us because

any content that is there could possibly be seen in Europe. So unless you're going to have a version of Twitter for different countries, which I don't see that happening, or x or whatever, they're going to be controlling what is said on the Internet. They're actually even set up an office European Union is set up an office in Silicon Valley for the censorship purposes, so they can be more tightly coupled to them dictatorship from abroad. How do we let these

European dictators control speech? But of course Pentagon has got its shares that same agenda. It's being reported that hundreds of unelected EU bureaucrats will decide what constitutes disinformation and will instruct big tech firms to censor it, and of course they'll be running They'll be doing the same function. These EU bureaucrats will be doing the same function that the ad L does. This is the content we don't want, So you work out how to find it quickly and shut it down

with artificial intelligence. They will be working with trusted flaggers, they said, you know, people like the Defamation League. That's the better way to understand who that's what must call them, he said, just drop the A. You're not anti defamation. You defame people. That's what you do for a living, your Defamation League. A priority channel will be created for these trusted

flaggers. So initially this new law from Europe, the DSA will apply to nineteen very large online platforms Ali Baba, Alley Express, Amazon Store, Apple app Store, Booking, dot Com, Facebook, Google Play, Google Maps, Google Shopping, Instagram, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Snapchat, TikTok x or Twitter, Wikipedia, YouTube. The European clothing retailer is Orlando. What's that how they get in there? Being an Google search. The penalties be extremely

severe. Could face six percent of global revenue or be completely banned from doing business in Europe. And if any of these large corporations want to support free speech, then they're going to have to ban themselves from Europe to start with, say we're not going to have a European version of this, but I don't see that happening. So on June twenty second, EU established their office

in San Francisco to keep an eye on these people. You know, Ramaswamy in terms of one of these meetings, he said he was asked a question by a person there and they said, when are we going to find out about Jeffrey Epstein's client lists? Isn't it interesting how good they are at hiding things from us. They hide everything from us, especially Jeffrey Epstein's client list. But everything we do is to be made open to them. And so

Ramaswamy says, well, we'll publish the Jeffrey Epstein clients. Let's roll blog over and let's see what crawls out. Yeah, that's what should be done. And he says a lot of stuff like that. I have absolutely no confidence that he would do that, quite frankly, but you know, nice to hear some of these comments and we know that that is what should be done. Before we take a break real quickly on rock Fan, thank you doogle log. Thank you very much for the tip. Appreciate that, and

we're going to be right back the common Man. They created common Core and dumbed down our children. They created common Past to track and control us their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful

weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the David Knightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers

The David Knightshow dot Com. Well, we were just talking about the ad L, how they're working with the European Union and everybody else sensor everyone for their political agenda, and this back and forth that is happening with Elon Musk is interesting. He says he's going to sue them because they're trying to put him out of business. He is routinely criticized across the board, with one very interesting exception, and of course the Conservatives are siding with him on this.

But there was an interesting exception from Newsweek. It was written by a guy who is an Orthodox Jew who used to work for the ADL, and he has the most devastating critique of that organization you'll hear, and we'll talk about that, but first, this is more typical of what we're seeing in this back and forth. La Times. Musk's criticism of the ADL is quote, the most extreme outburst of anti semitism by a mainstream public figure in more

than a hundred years. Just ridiculous. And of course I've been attacked by the ADL as well to anti semiticchin hateful, extremist, everything they can think of as well. It's part of a big part of my problems is the

ADL. They really are And I'll tell you why I know that. Over the weekend, Musk launched a ferocious this is the La Times, Musk launched a ferocious, spittle flecked attack on the Anti Defamation League, which describes itself accurately enough as quote a global leader in combating anti Semitism, countering extremism, and battling bigotry wherever and whenever it happens. Oh there you go, isn't that nice? That's their mission? Statement is so true, isn't it.

No, every word of that is a lie. Every word of that is a lie. He asserted that the US advertising revenue at X is down sixty percent, primarily due to pressure on advertisers by the ADL And so he says, that's what advertisers tell us. So they have almost succeeded in killing X slash Twitter. So the La Times, that's what Must said. The La Times response to that said, not to put a fine point on things, but all this shows Musk to have gone utterly off the rails and over the

edge of conspiracy mongering paranoia. It's the most excuse me, it's the most extreme outburst of anti semitism by purportedly mainstream public figure in more than one hundred years. Wow, it's words should and then they finish with this. You know, everybody knows it. Musk makes or should know, Must became the richest man in the world by his servile fulfillment of the government's most tolitarian wishes. Let's get rid of the cars. Now, let's get rid of drivers.

As a matter of fact, we'll solve this idea of self driving cars and everything. That was DARPA's first project was self driving vehicles. So everything that he's done has been to serve government. So La Times as well, the way we get back at this king of chronic capitalism, that's not their description of it. As a matter of fact, that's what Eric Peters called Elon Musk about a decade ago we first started talking the King of chronic capitalism.

Great description, So LA Times says his words should prompt the federal government to question his suitability and that of his company space X to hold government contracts of any kind. Yeah, cut him off at the source. The guy who wrote that as someone named Michael hilt Zick and Information Liberation says he positions himself as moral authority. Last year he wrote a column and the LA Time saying that it was necessary necessary was his term to mock the deaths of anti

vaxers. La Times. Here's the call him mocking Anti Baxter's death as ghoulish. Yes, but necessary? Is that hate speech from this guy? Oh No, we don't care about that. That's not extremist. That's an extremist too, withhold organ transplants from people, let him die. It's not extremists to withhold any medical any and all medical treatment. From people and let them die. We've heard that so that over and over again. Oh, you don't wear masks, you don't take the vaccine, you should die, and

we're not going to give you any medical treatment because of that. That's necessary and it's great to do that, says this guy the La Times. The fact of the matter is the ADL brags about their ability to influence advertisers and bring companies to heal about their agenda, and ah, you know he has

in this article clips of them doing that. As a matter of fact, some people responded to Elon Musk and said, hey, they're the documentary out there you want to watch, called defamation written by and Israel, done by an Israeli filmmaker. They gave him access to the Adel because she is Israeli, and he was not very happy with what he saw. Here's a little clip from it that was on the tweet. You have enough resources to deal with all this stuff. No, no, no, no, no,

anyway, we're flatted every day with these things all over the country. It's a very big problem. According to the ADL reports from the last couple of years, the average number of anti Semitic incidents in the US is around fifteen hundred a year. I'm hoping Joe Levi can help me find a case I'll be able to follow. You'd actually do it to follow a case, I understand. You know, every film is like a drive. Once we have like a case that we can follow, so that that would be great.

We're going over the fresh data collected over the last couple of weeks to see if there's anything I will be able to film. We have received in the last week or so. Someone who employment case, someone who didn't didn't wasn't able to take days off for the holiday, someone who is a school teacher and wanted days off for chavoot, someone who is a nursing student and had some issues with taking time off as well as uh, we're taking time off.

We also got a phone call from someone who was complaining about a website that had anti Semitic remarks on it. Uh, someone who was complaining about an article in the newspaper who they thought had anti semitic had anti Semitic undertones. And I mean that seems to be the round up and that that's what we've had in the last two weeks. Those those are the kinds of incidents that we've had recently five and two weeks, so there's no way to at

there wasn't anything suitable from the last two weeks. Yeah, that's from a documentary. Is an Israeli filmmaker goes to the ADL. There's a defamation. It's like, so this is what you've got. You got some people upset because they couldn't get off for a Jewish holiday. People upset because a couple of remarks on a website. Now they set their sites much higher. As a matter of fact, it's not a theory, it's not paranoia. It's

not a conspiracy theory. It's a conspiracy fact that the ADL tries to destroy people. And you know it's it only makes news when they do it to the really big people. Doesn't make news when they do it to me. And so, as he points out, Information Liberation says, as I point out, in twenty twenty one, the ADL, which supports anti BDS laws,

at band Americans from boycotting the state of Israel. They lobbied the World Federation of Advertisers to Boycontucker Carlson and Fox News because he was talking about the Great replacement. The Great replace meant the idea that you know, and it's not. It is a conspiracy Soros and others. It's not a theory. You can see it happening in America. You can see it happening in Europe

as they're bringing massive waves of people, typically not families. These are young men coming in and you know, bringing violence and coming in in a way. They're not interested in assimilating. They're not interested in becoming. They didn't want to, you know, essentially join the French people not coming to France because they love French culture or cuisine. They're coming because they want the stuff the French people have and they're wrecking everything. The great replacement is what he's

talking about. So Jonathan Greenblatt bragged about the fact after Tucker Carlson was fired that he had something to do with it. I think it was the lawsuit coming up about raps. But anyway, he says what Jonathan Greenblatt said, he said, it's about time. For far too long, Tucker Carlson has used his primetime show to spew anti Semitic, racist, xenophobic, anti LGBTQ hate. Two millions ADL has long call for his firing for this and many

other offenses, including spreading the great replacement theory. And then, as he points out, two weeks after Fox fired Tucker Karlson, they bragged about how much more revenue they were making. And look, we all knew this as well. It had been a longstanding fact. And a lot of people said, you know, they're going to lose a lot of audience because of Tucker. But there's so much boycotting of advertisers there that he's really not making as

much money as some of the other programs. The question is is he bringing an audience that then stays for the other programs that the advertisers will advertise on. And so it was commonly known that the advertiser that the audiences loved Tucker, but they hated but the advertisers boycotted him and did not want to advertise on his program. And look, I'm no fan, as you know, if you listen to this program, I'm no fan of Elon Musk, and I'm no fan of Tucker Carlson. I think he's a Elon Musk is a

con man trying to get the right to love him. And you got for his further agenda this there, and Tucker Carlson is nothing but a Voice of America mouthpiece like his dad was all of his life, and he is now descending into tabloid garbage, as he did in this most recent program, bringing in a guy who says that he had homosexual sex with Obama nineteen nine nine. Look, who cares about that? I frankly don't care about I care if Obama is pushing it. I care about that, but I don't really

want to know what somebody's doing in their bedroom. YEA thing I have a problem with is people shoving this in your face and recruiting it to kids and making this oh, you should do this because I do it type of thing. I don't support the homosexual life style. God has made that clear what he thinks of it, and so I would tell people for their own good not to do that. That's between you and God, and unless you make it some kind of a political movement, which is what they have done.

But Obama's not in office right now, and the salacious reporting, the tabloid reporting that Tucker has got to there aren't more important things out there that are happening. The vaccine is still killing people, you know. They're trying to ramp up climate change mcguffin in order to take everything from it. So he's going to go talk about Obama's sex life. He's all about entertainment and audience and money, and he's controlled by the CIA. But the advertiser thing that

is was there. That's a real thing, the real boycotts and advertising that had a big effect. And I'm sure that that factored a lot into is firing. And it's what they're trying to do to Elon Musk and they should not have that kind of power. As a matter of fact. This this is the Newsweek article I was talking about. It's a man named ron Coleman, and this is the best takedown of this criminal organization. And I say

they're criminal. They are. Anybody who goes out and deliberately tries to destroy people's lives and tries to destroy our free speech in this society is criminal. Jonathan Greenblatt and the ADL are criminal crooks. You can take that to the bank. And here's what Ron Coleman says a Newsweek of all places, the ADL has lost its way. Elon Musk is right to stand up to its

censorship. He says, as a young law student back in nineteen eighty seven, I read an article about quote human rights violation being perpetrated by Israel and the National Law Review. Never a shrinking violet, I dashed off a letter to the editor in protest. A couple of days after it was printed, two letters arrived in my law school mailbox, both of them anti Semitic and threatening. I was a bit spooked, so I called the Chicago office of

the Anti Defamation League. A fellow named Michael Lieberman invited me to come in, and when I showed him the letters, he recognized one of the authors, a known crank with many disturbing qualities by the name of Anthony Martin Trigona. The man is a serial litigant who has by now filed over two hundred and fifty political lawsuits. But he was also essentially harmless, Michael explained, and the ADL would quote file my letters case closed. Back then, the

ADL adhered to the values America was founded upon. It existed to protect Jews from attacks, and it did so within the confines of free speech values, albeit with a liberal slant. I know because after my encounter with ADL in nineteen eighty seven, I volunteered as an ADL legal intern. It was fun and I did believe I was doing good. Everyone believed that, and it

was true. The ADL taught me that nasty grams from jew haters were just the price that we pay for liberty, and it's worthy of being filed and forgotten. This is not Weimar Germany. It is America. We have a First Amendment, we have civil rights, we have a working democracy. That is part of the good that we have done. But the ADL no longer believes this. It has become part of a great online censorship machine that is being exposed day after day as an anti free speech enterprise. Yes, the

ADL is directing the censorship now. And if you're going to have free speech, you have to allow speech of people that you don't like and the people that don't like you. It's just that simple. And if you are going to drive these people out of business punish them, then you know you And that's what our government is doing. And for the longest time, conservatives have been saying, oh, they're they're just doing this because that's what they believe.

I don't agree with them. And we've heard people at Reason, at the Cato Institute, at the Heritage Foundation and they would all say that. John Stossel would say, yeah, you know, I really hate their censoring me. I hate it. You know, we disagree about things, and they're kicking me off of their platforms. But it's their platforms. They can do whatever they want. No, I said at the time, and I still say it. And now we've seen the receipts. They're always doing the

bidding of the government. They were always doing the bidding of the government. They are the deputized state. They were created in the nineteen nineties for this purpose by DARPA, and they're now executing that purpose. And we have proof of that. Now. We have a great deal of documentation. It's not

a conclusion, it is documented proof. It goes on to say the National ADL, like the ACLU, like the NAACP and other formally quote a political unquote civil rights groups, it's now merely a tax exempt condre for the National Democrat Party. It's absolutely true, he says, as an orknox Jew, I want people, especially American conservatives, to know that the ADL does not

speak for all Jews. And it's very important because you know that this circular logic that is there is that if you criticize the ADL for its censorship policies and it's dictatorial aspect, and it's you know, it's it's really kind of Stazi policies. You criticize them for that, Oh, you are anti Semitic.

There by definition, if you criticize the Anti Defamation League, then you are pro defamation of Jews, as the logic evidently, but the ADL came after me because I said that Trump's lockdown was medical martial law from day one and the beginning of April of twenty twenty, the ADL, in conjunction with The Daily Beast called me out as this wild eyed extremist who thought that, you know, the lockdown from Trump locking everybody down until you and I said,

it's locking us down until we get the vaccine. Oh, you're you're a conspiracy theorist, you're an extremist, you're hateful, you're anti Semitic, all of those things. Anyway, says they don't speak for all Jews, And I want to draw attention to the fact that the ADEL is largely silent when national figures and institutions aim nasty rhetoric and resentment at the most visible Jews,

or what we call in my house the jeweyest Jews. The ADL has let our community down so many times that it's silence is not even a letdown anymore. And let me just say this about the ACLU American Civil Liberties Union. I remember when I was involved the Libertarian Party in the latter part of the nineteen eighties and the early part early to the mid nineties. I would go to their national conventions and stuff, and they would always have somebody from

the ASLU. Typically it was Nadine Strausser, because she was the only one they could find at the ADLU that kind of supported She didn't like guns, but she kind of supported the Second Amendment. All the rest of them were adamantly opposed to that. But there were such frauds. The ACLU would always pick these high profile cases to show how broad minded they were and how they

were holding principle above their personal preferences. They would defend the Nazis who would go to Skokie, Illinois and march an end a Nazi parade, Jew hating parade and Skokie, Illinois, but they would not lift a finger to defend the civil liberties of people who were libertarians, who were simply trying to get on the ballot or trying to get into a debate. It was all about that symbolism over substance, you see, And that's what they were really about

anyway. He says that about the ADL as well. All but the most institutionally constrained Orthodox Jews openly reciprocate the contempt that the ADL seems to harbor for traditional Judaism, its values, and its people. The widespread belief in my community is that the ad L does not object to public expressions of hatred and fear of Orthodox Jews because the assimilated Jews that run the place share those sentiments

themselves. My own disdain for the formerly righteous ADEL reached a peak a few years ago when I learned just how far its commitment to leftist dogma went. I encountered it as part of my work as a lawyer who does both defamation and free speech litigation, trying to get my arms around the ways smear groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center go about deep platforming disfavored people. I kept bumping into the same rogues gallery, and the ADEL was far more often

than not part of the pro censorship coalition. That's really what they're about, isn't it. And then we go back to right, and this is an article going back to August twenty first, twenty twenty one, PayPal's unholy alliance with the ADL, and they said two weeks ago, So this is, you know, the first week of August, which was about six weeks after I got banned by PayPal and Bemo without explanation, and when I looked at it, they said, well, there's nothing here that just says take it

down, immediately, take your account down, immediately. PayPal and Benmo banned me, and then I found out about six weeks after that that they had joined an alliance with the a d L. Same people whould attacked me a year earlier called me an extremist for saying it was medical martial law. Is that anything to do with any ethnic group. It had to do with their

political agenda and what they were doing they're hiding behind find this stuff. And then, of course Musk himself is a free speech fraud, and I've been public about that as well, and I'm sure that Musk knows that about me as well. One of the reasons why I don't have any engagement on Twitter. Matt Drudge saw my tweet somehow and I said, I haven't seen any change in the new Twitter at all. I said, he's brought back a few high profile people that were banned, made a big deal out of that,

but it hasn't really opened up as a free speech platform. Still shadow band. And so he put that up on Drudge Report and left it for about three days. So I'm sure that you know, if Musk hadn't had me on his sites before, he's got me on his sites now. And he took down a video from rfk JR. Just happened a couple of days ago, And as it was reported by Vigilant News, I said, ever since Elon Musk hired CEO Lenda Jacarino, who has close ties to the World

Economic Form, things have taken a turn for the worst. No, it han't. It never got better. It got better for a few people who were brought back who had been kicked off, and then they obsequiously praised Musk to a disgusting It's one thing I can't stand it is flattery. I don't like to be on the receiving end of it, and I don't like to give it to people. It disgusted me. So I was disgusted to see these people slathering all over Musk. Oh he brought me back. It's like,

get a life. But no, it's he hired this woman. She's there to do what he wants to do. And I said before he hired her. Yeah, she works for the World Economic Form and so she's going to be the person who's going to run this stuff out that he needs to do because of the Dial the Services Act. I think whatever DSA, it should call a DCA, the Digital Censorship Aact. But yeah, he needs

to He wants her to do that stuff. He doesn't want it to reflect on him, and if it becomes too obvious, he'll have to fire her and then hire somebody else just like her. But he needs have that done. These people make excuses for Trump for Musk like they do for Trump. They want to believe that Musk and Trump are benevolent billionaires who are going to

save us there are saviors. No, they're not at all. And used to have this argument with Alex all the time about both of them, Musk and Trump, and both have pretty much given him the shaft, that's for sure. But it was the video that was put up by RFK Jr. Was kind of an odd video for RFK Junior put up, and I think a false video. Really. He's selling a false narrative about what is going on with a pandemic. And and this has been a troubling trend since RFK

Junior has been running for office. In my opinion, he's focusing more and more on the Wuhan Lab narrative to say that there really was a pandemic, that there really was a COVID virus, that it really was killing people. And in this particular thing, he doubles down on that, and in this particular video that was taken down, he doubles down on that, and he has a very odd perspective. He says that even though it kept people from dying from COVID, no it didn't. No, it didn't. It's such

a strange perspective. You know, it wasn't the hospital death protocol. It was this Chinese wu flu okay, I mean, is is RFK Junior trying to, you know, put himself in a servile position to the military industrial complex that ran these games and ran this whole scheme, is that what's going on with them, we're going to go back to it was a deadly virus and we had to do something, and the vaccine was good, and the vaccine saved people, it's what he says. But now it saved them from

COVID. Now they're dying of heart attacks and other things. Is that true. No, it's not. That's not remotely true. So disappointing that he would take this route, but it's an odd perspective. Look, we all know that the people who got vexed are getting COVID more often than those who didn't get vexed. Okay, and then the heart attacks and the blood clots and all the rest of the stuff. It's just on top of all of that stuff. And when I say they get COVID more, they've got the

spike protein replicating in their body and they're testing. The PCR test is testing to see if it can find that. So Whitney flag positive for that. That's what's going on. This thing is killing people in so many different ways. And to say, well, look, you know they didn't test it, so they don't know about the heart attacks adverse effect, and so it worked, but you know, more people are getting this disease. What a

dishonest tact that he has taken on this very disappointing to see that. We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back making sense common again. You're listening to the David Night Show. Speaking of COVID nineteen, Goldman Sacks put out a model yesterday saying that if there is universal masks, it would be a net positive for GDP. We know the HM model says that if there were universal masks that it would be beneficial, it would save

lives. So if there is an economic benefit, sir, and there is a public health benefit, sir, why not go forward and say there should be mandatory masks all across the sky. I'm all for masks. I think masks are good. I would wear if I were in a group of people and I was close, you would wear one. Oh I would Oh, I have I mean people have seen me wearing one. I mean I'd have no problem. Actually I had a mask, and I sort of like the way I looked. Okay, I thought it was okay. It was a

dark black mask. Yeah, he looks kind of fascist, doesn't he should say? Maybe facist? But there he is with his entourage military, all men in uniforms. It was a war against us. The Empire struck back at US big time, with Trump military backing him up. That was a military operation from the very beginning. Always was. All these German games were military industrial complex and intelligence community all doing this stuff. Yeah, yeah, he would. He looks really cool in the mask. You said, I

can't breathe in this thing. Yeah, he's kind of a He's kind of a Darth Vader himself, isn't he. Yeah, he was selling the masks and he was. You had Chris Christie, remember Chris Christie. He sold the mask. Pence saw the mask. Pence, you sell these pictures of Faucci and Burke's given the podium to rule over us and to put the rules out for us and all the rest of the stuff, and standing behind them in the pictures, who is it standing behind them? Is Pence and Trump?

Always there, always pushing this stuff. And you know at that time, and I bring this up because you know Trump is reinventing himself. We now have Trump two point zero. I mean, after he continued to push the vaccine for two years after he left office, and all these people Wayne Allen Root and Alex Jones and all these peoples stop pushing the vaccine. It's bad. We all know it's bad. Stop telling your bass hates that. You got to stop saying that. And then when he announced his candidacy,

he stopped saying it. And now he's reinvented himself as mister resistance, do not comply and all the rest of this stuff. Yeah, they're bringing the mask, don't you do that? And now he's talking about how well you know, if Biden is going to come out with a vaccine, it needs to be tested. What they want you to believe that Trump has changed. Do you believe the Trump has changed? No? A matter of fact,

let's go back and take a look at Milania. She actually did a mask commercial, just like Chris Christy didn't, except she did it in kind of a Calvin Klein's why as the CDC continue to study the spread of covidness, she's standing there kind of at an angle like a model. You know, wear cloth face coverings in public settings where social distancing measures can be difficult to maintain. It can be difficult to maintain restores and pharmacies. Remember the does

not replace the importance of social distancing. Yes, they lockdown mand that guideline to keep us all safe. Yeah, you do what we recommend. I'm not giving anybody any orders, but I got to tell you that I wear my mask or I wear nothing at all, you know, so you know she does these types of things. Becose she did the push for him when he was running for president about how Trump had been the most LGBT friendly president we'd had at that point in time. He came in celebrating homosexual mirage.

He appointed homosexuals to high places. To his credit, Rick Grennell was not a totally deranged, sex obsessed idiot like Sam Brinton or Dick Glomine. But you know the virtue of that. I pointed this guy because he's LGBT. Really what we're going to do. As a matter of fact, this was also put out on my Twitter feed, and thank you for sending that to me. Had a listener who put that Milania thing on one of the Twitter

feeds. I had not seen that before. That was from COVID nineteen vaccines spelled va XI n S. And then this is also put out Trump as a mask patriot. This is also put on my Twitter account. Here he is back in July twenty twenty. We are wearing a mask. Man of action. Look at his hands are stretched out there, man of action. We are united in our effort to defeat the invisible China virus. See now

RFK Jr. Is selling that the China virus the Wu flu. And many people say that it is patriotic to wear a face mask when you can't socially distance. There is nobody more patriotic than me, your favorite president. And he shows himself in the mask, and I had clipped it out of that fox thing. But when he was talking about how good he looked in the mask, how facioust he looked, he said, I look kind of like the Long Ranger. And it's like the Lone Ranger, or the mask over

his eyes. You're trying to pull the mask over our eyes, but you're wearing the mask over your mouth. Doesn't stop you from that. And of course, you know, and for Wars of selling masks and Mike Adams of selling mask it was patriotic, but more than that, it was profitable, very profitable. And so now we have Trump two point zero. You know, he's gone from telling everybody that it was a miracle, as he did Candice Bergen of mankind, we would have had a nineteen seventeen. Remember the

Spanish flu killed perhaps one hundred million people. Yeah, I remember. You keep telling that line. You told it yesterday because the soldiers was a lot of people don't know that the soldiers got so sick. It was a terrible thing. There was no vaccines, it would know anything. I came up with a vaccine with three vaccines all are He didn't be very good. Three of them. He didn't three of them in less than nine months. It was supposed to take five to twelve years. And people have died under COVID

this year. By the way, when dear Joe Biden, than under you and what the vaccine? The people are questioning how another vaccine work, but some people aren't telling the ones, the ones that get very sick and go to the hospital of the one see. According to Kennis Owens, it's not enough that Trump created the three vaccines, but Trump must be the one to administer it as well for it to work. That's the miraculous thing about the

Trump vaccines, isn't it. It's not enough that he stopped all the testing, but he's got to be the one to administer it as well. The vaccines only work when Trump is in the White House. It's really strange. It's really it's magic. It really is magic. And so now we've got more magic stuff happening with the Trump sycophant press out there. He is now talking about safety, and Travis, I don't see the safety thing. Can

you pull that in. I want to talk about the safety thing. But let's talk about the prep First of all, you're finding the Trump safety right here. He talks about the preparation. Hey, he in this interview that he had with Tutor Dixon. Tutor Dixon who was the Michigan failed gubertorial candidate. She has a podcast and she was just as you know, flattering as

you saw Candice Owen. And so after this long discourse where he talks about the nineteen eighteen flu again, and let me just say this, they were trying to make these comparisons from the very beginning. And I said, you go back and you look at the nineteen eighteen flu, and you look at the deaths by ages. I said, this is the nineteen eighteen flu was

what a pandemic would look like. You had spikes in terms of people who who died, and they you had the two spikes, babies under a year old and people over eighty die, so the very very young are going to be vulnerable and they're very very old. But with those exceptions, you know, people over eighty and people under a year old. Without with those exceptions,

it was pretty much the same across every decade. But I said, if you look at the age deaths that they're telling us about that the CDC was putting out, they're cooked books that they put out, and they said, well, the people that are dying from COVID, it looked like the actuarial tables or the insurance companies, and we know that it was typically people who are over the age of life expectancy, who had on average two point six co morbidities that were dying, and they were calling it COVID. It

wasn't it was life expectancy. It was the insurance actuarial tables, and it was the hospital death protocol that he was paying for. And yet he continues to talk about this nineteen eighteen flu thing complete garbage. But when he talks about the preparation, this is the part of the interview where it's like, well, well, you know, Biden is out there saying he's going to

come up with a new vaccine, one that works. But the vaccine the pharmaceutical companies have been protected by the PREP Act and that protects them until I think it's December twenty fourth when that sun sets. So once that sunsets, and then they can be held liable for any type of vaccine injuries. Will you tell the vaccer these companies that they must be honest about what has happened with this vaccine and do you believe that we should be starting a new vaccine

at this point? They have to. Let look, they have to be honest with the numbers of faction. You know, they have an obligation to be honest, and if they are going to hold back means it holding back something that's not good. So it's good for them to be honest. And people are going to understand that's exactly what. They have to be honest with the and they have to any information, they have to release it. And

that is not what we're hearing from this current administration. And mister President, I'm telling you there are people out there that are desperate to have you stand for them in that case, Well, we'll stand for him in many ways. Well and not nice. According to Tutor Nick Dixon. If we can just get Trump back in, everything's just going to be great. He's going

to save us. He's going to do the testing that he skipped for this first job, and he's going to get the FDA to honestly evaluate this stuff, and they're going to share all the information with people. You know, if you're keeping this information, said Trump, that's criminal to not give that information out there, and yet that was what he did. What he did. Listen to him. In terms of safety, Joe Biden just announced that he's going to be funding a new vaccine. He wants everyone to get this

vaccine. And we're hearing about a lot of complaints from vaccine injured. To say a lot, it's like an understatement, numerous your vaccine. Your vaccine used to release their data on vaccine side effects. But we've seen cases of myocardatis, blood cots, heart attacks, they're all increasing with your vaccine. That the the research for this vaccine release. So will you his vaccine tutor,

come on, you can be honest. The pharmaceutical companies release their vaccine data to the public so that we can see what they're actually seeing about the side effects of this vaccine. Well, they should do that. You know, we're all of this together and they should be doing that. And frankly, anything new and I had heard what he said yet, but anything new is going to be looked at very carefully. But he did facts. I

mean, the facts are public. They should be made public immediately. People should under said that, and they should they should know what research is showing and what facts. I think you know this is now after the case. Yeah, yeah, so you know when you look at here's the headlines from Enforce, that's Tutor Dixon, servile sycophant to him. If you just get back at, mister president, we got to get you back at. We got to get you to save us from this vaccine that Biden is about to

roll out. Save us from your vaccine, mister president. Son for War's article huge Trump finally all of her case, finally addresses the vaccine side effects and urges transparency by big pharma. No he didn't, No, he didn't do either one of those. As a matter of fact, you heard her go through the litany. There, blood clots, myocarditis, heart attacks widely attributed to the COVID nineteen jap that's a Trump shot. It's the Trump shot.

Did he address that? Did you hear Trump respond to myocarditis, to blood clots, the heart attacks? Did he respond to any of that? Did he respond to you know the facts that it doesn't work? Did he respond to anything? No, he didn't. He did not finally respond, he is still playing the same game with everybody. So is in for wars, and so as the post millennial and all the rest of these places playing the same game. Spend game, spend the Trump bottle, and it always

comes back to pointing at cash, doesn't it. Trump calls on COVID vaccine makers to release their safety data. Now now we've got the data, we've got the data. We've got the safety data. They used us as lab rats, and we know exactly what has happened with us. We don't need them to release the data. We need them to be put in jail along with Trump and Biden for pushing this on people and for letting them get away with us. Trump took credit for the three vaccines they got out. It

was a miracle. It was a miracle that he isn't swinging for the stuff, that he isn't in prison for life, because like I said before, this is like murder on the Orient Express. Everybody on the train grabs a knife and takes a stab at the public, the American public and the people around the world. They all stabbed us with the jab. They all have killed our society, our liberty, our constitution and people. And they got away with it because they're covering for each other, and the press covers him.

People like Tutor Dixon, people like Alex Jones and info Wars. They four d chess, right, Maybe it was supposed to be four times a number of deaths. Maybe that was what it was. I think anything new has got to be looked at very carefully. He said Trump really, well, that's not what he did. You know, he didn't do anything to develop these vaccines. But what he did was he shut down all the testing. That was what was warp speed about it. If they have the facts,

they be made public immediately. They have to be honest with the numbers. If they're going to hold back, that means it dishonest. Right, How do you how do you have any numbers and facts if you skipped the testing. You had one job to do and you didn't do it. Did you? Instead? You came up with the hospital death protocol and you bribed hospitals to kill people with ventilators and with thream de severe and with withholding treatment

from them. So Dixon said, so will you demand the vaccine companies that the pharmaceutical companies release their vaccine data to the public so that we can see what they're actually seeing about the side effects of this vaccine. Well, they should do that, you know, we're all into this together. They should be doing that. And as she finishes up, I just love you Trump. You are our only hope. Help me. You'll be one Canoby right? What that will Ham? What came out of there? Said Trump?

Because it it came out of Wuhan Lab. And what they did to the world was unbelievable, sixty trillion dollars in damages. It wasn't China that did that, Trump, it was you. It was you, and the globalists in every country did that to their own people. You didn't have to follow their lead. You didn't have to lock people now, you didn't have to destroy businesses. I don't know. Maybe it was ray Ups, That's who it was. It was ray Ups. It wasn't China, it wasn't Trump,

it wasn't alex It was ray Ups who did that. Yeah, that guy gets around and he and he made so much money doing it too, didn't he. The affirmative messages showing this is info wars. The affirmative message showing the former president is aware of the multitude of vaccine injured Americans comes as Trump vowed last week, the pushback against COVID hysteria, which he credits for

helping Joe Biden rig the election. Yeah, this isn't pushing back, trying very hard to bring back COVID lockdowns and mandates with all of their sudden fear mongering about the new variants that are coming. Gee whiz, you know what else is coming in election? They want to restart the COVID hysterias so they can justify more lockdowns, more censorship, more illegal drop boxes, more mail in ballots, and trillions of dollars in payoffs to their political allies heading into

the twenty four election visits. Yeah it sounds familiar, because that's what you did in twenty twenty. Absolutely amazing. They also say earlier this year,

this isn't for war still. Trump also declared that if he re elected, excuse me, if we elected, he planned to form a task force to probe the quote stunning rise and autism, autoimmune disorders, obesity and fertility, serious allergies, etc. He said that when he was running in twenty sixteen, and then he brought in RFK Jr. To Trump Tower and said, well, I'm gonna put you an over a committee that's going to take a

look at this. And RFK Jr. Came out and said, yeah, we're going to test these for safety and efficacy and all the rest of stuff. And he was just using RFK Jr to bid up his price to big pharmaceutical companies who made a massive donation. And then he populated put the CEO of Eli Lilly in as out of HHS Alex Hazar. Then he put in a visor guy into the FDA and who has now gone back to the FDA. But again, you know, and for words, this is the way

post millennial. But at breaking Trump calls for COVID vax makers to release safety data. Nobody but these couple of organizations can look at that Tudor Dixon shameful interview, shameful what she did there and come away with that conclusion. Meanwhile, Ed Dowd, the former Black Rock asset manager and data analyst, went on the Doctor Drew Show, and he said death rates are climbing fast,

especially with kids. He said the years twenty twenty and twenty twenty one had negative excess death mortality rates, meaning that the death rate amongst children was less than anticipated. For those years, death rates were down, respectively by nine percent as the pandemic was raging. Death of children was down by nine percent. Again, this was not a pandemic in any sense of the word. It was the Actuarial Table and their hospital death protocols and their lying statistics.

But it was now nine percent in twenty twenty and then twenty twenty one on seven percent at the beginning of the year, and then it soared up. And of course that's what you would expect because the kids are locked down. They're not out doing anything, you know, they can't drown in a bucket of water or anything like that, you know. So these rates dramatically shifted to sixteen percent more death than anticipated and twenty two percent more death than anticipated

this year so far. Well, there you go, the Trump shot, the child killer vaccines that info wars and the MAGA sycophants want to push out there. Yeah, it's just four d chests, and you are the ponds and all of this. And so when you look at this long history of you know, take the gun and do the due process later. Take the

shot. I don't care what your religious objections are, he said. And May of two nineteen, as New Jersey, New York, California were shutting down religious objections, medical objections to the MMR shots and these childhood vaccines that let's not forget they kill a massive number of people as well, and Trump said, yeah, they got to take the shot. It's going around. They gotta get the shot. They gotta get the shot. Don't tell me.

He's not in favorite mandates. He's just going to run them out in a different way than Biden does, and it'll be less transparently evil than the way Biden does it. He later then said, take the job, take the business down. We're gonna have to lock you down. Don't worry. Stimulus check is coming later. It's going to get you used to universal basic income. And then we'll shut down the churches and I'll still get the evangelical vote. Right. And so, now this is an article talking about church

attendants after the so called pandemic. It is remarkable that churches reveal the full scope of how the pandemic affected worship attendance and conflict in the pews and much more. Another legacy of Trump a report titled Back to Normal The Mixed Messages of Congregational Recovery coming out of the Pandemic, conducted by the Hartford Institute for Religious Research, and they said attendance is on the rise with Christian denominations.

Before COVID nineteen, worship attendants had a median of sixty five people. Now it is still down to sixty amazing, how small it is. Small number of people attend church. And then they said, most people, however, are now still virtually watching. Attendance virtually jumped to a median of seventy five, which is above the sixty five that they saw doing virtual church service. You know, many times we said church is not a building, right,

It's not. Yeah, we've said, well that church and it's a church building. But the church is the people and church is not virtual. Church is a people, right, Church is the people the called out. You know, people are not getting called out of their rooms to go meet with other people. It's about people and it's about that mutual aspect, you know, that horizontal aspect that is has to be there for our sanctification, right, for us to start to grow up and to grow towards God, we

have to have that that interaction directly with people. There's no substitute for that. Now, this is the way God designed it. Uh, you know He did not design it to be done virtually. In terms of money, they said, the average median income for the church in twenty twenty one hundred twenty thousand. That number has grown to one hundred and seventy thousand, forty

two percent increase over the past three years. Wow. So I guess everything's okay, right, because you know, if we've got more people, you look at the numbers. If you take the people who are actually physically there and the people are virtually the numbers are up. Crowd is bigger and the money is way bigger. Now, these are the metrics of mankind. This

is not God's metrics, they said. Plus, the average percentage of church members over the age of sixty five increase from thirty three percent to thirty six percent from twenty twenty to twenty twenty three. These are not massive jumps, but they're noticeable statistics considering current concerns over the decrease of young people entering the church, which is plummeting even as membership in the Church of LGBT explodes.

Yeah, we're losing that information war, aren't we. So Joe Biden, we're supposed we're told now has COVID, and Brightbart says, well, we were told that we weren't going to get it if you got vaccinated, you know, if you would take Trump's shot, which remember when Trump was president, Biden said the Trump shots would not work. And then when Biden became

president, now magically the Trump shots work, except they don't work. And we know that Trump's got to be president according to Tudor Dixon for these shots to work, right. I don't know. Again, I'm very suspicious that Joe Biden has tested positive for COVID. Maybe they if she actually did get jabbed, and I'm skeptical of that. If she did get jabbed, maybe

that's what they're testing positive as some remnants of that in her system. But this is part of a narrative that's being sold, and Brightbart is missing that because they're just going, you know, Trump versus Biden, and Trump, let's criticize Biden over this hypocrisy. They will say, well, look at that. You know, he said that if you got his shot, you wouldn't get COVID. But now his wife gotten it twice. So you don't have a problem with the shot. You have a problem with Biden, right,

Bright Bart, that's it. They don't have a problem with the vaccine. Let's just score some political points out of this thing for a second time she goes positive. There's two stories on bright part about that as a matter of fact. So they're very interested in pointing out the fact that the Bidens are lying to you, but don't point out the fact that big pharmaceutical companies and Trump are lying to you as well and killing you. They're all killing

you. The Biden's, Biden's lying, the Biden's kill and so it's a Trump and the Republicans White House. Joe Biden is now masking up indoors again. Okay, and again you know Trump, don't comply with it this time because now it's Biden. And I said that, I said, you know a lot of people will criticize a vaccine, A lot of people criticize these measures that aren't doing it. Now if Biden gets in, I was The only thing I was surprised about was just how silent the GOP remained about pharmaceutical

stuff because they're totally owned. Even people Mike Rampaul, a physician, will come after Fauci for He says, you're creating vaccine hesitancy by pushing this stuff out to people. That was his problem with it. Aaron Kiati says, the rise of the biomedical security state during the COVID era, Yeah, it was a Trump error, right R R O R as I said before. I called it medical martial law from the very beginning, as soon as he did it, he says. In a new book, doctor Aaron Kiyati says

that a debate, even by scientists was censored. Refusal to obey these arbitrary and positions could mean arrest, legal action, as he himself found out, losing one's job. What we saw rolled out in March of twenty twenty was not a new approach to public health, he said, but a new paradigm of government, of governance, and of controlling populations on a widespread scale. The rise the biomedical security state exactly right. We'll be right back. But

unlike most revolutions, whether people rise against the real economic oppression. In our case, here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle. It is, however, not nearly so abstract as a young gentleman's supposes. The issue involved here is one of monopolies. Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country. Tomorrow it will be something else, liberty. It's your move. You're listening to the David Night Show.

Well, I think it was kind of interesting. I saw this headline on the Drudge Report. The article came from The Guardian The Immortals. The Immortals meet the billionaires who are forking out for eternal life. Well, a fascinating, often terrifying new podcast about immortality delves into the links that longevity superstars will go to to make ninety the new fifty, from swapping blood with the young to designing the first post humanism post humans. I should say that is post

humanism, it is transhumanism. Well, the immortals, that's what they've decided to call this. They're now openly talking about blood transference from young people to make these people live longer. And pull up that picture again, Travis, that guy who is there, he is the billionaire, and on the right is his son that he is getting blood from to make himself younger. And

he's forty six years old. And apart from the fact that you know he doesn't have a lot of body fat, that doesn't change anything when you get a blood transfusion. He's working out a lot. But you know, you can still see that he's older than the guy on the right. So eventually he is going to die, right, He's not going to be immortal. Even if he makes ninety the new fifty, he's still going to die. And it reminded me of that quote from C. S. Lewis that you've

probably heard. He said, there are no ordinary people. You have never talked to a mere mortal. Nations die, cultures die, art dies, civilizations. These are all mortal, and their life is to ours as the life of a gnat. But it is immortals whom we joke with, who we work with, who we marry, who we snub, who we exploit

immortal horrors or everlasting splendors. And he went on to say that the ordinary people that you see walking down the street will one day be transformed into something that is so hideous that you could not bear to look at it, or become so glorious that you would be tempted to bow down and worship it. There are no mere mortals, and these people are selling you lives. Brian Johnson was paying hundreds of thousands of dollars to infuse one leader of his teenage

son's youthful plasma into his own aging bloodstream every month. I've never paid more attention to what he is eating because what he was eating was going into my body. He didn't care about his son's health until he started trying to parasitically live off of his son's health. He says that on his new podcast, The Immortals, he continues to pay two million dollars a year for a research team to investigate how we can live longer. Isn't it amazing that someone who

has that much money is so afraid of death. He's obsessed with it. He's always looking over shoulder because death is just half a step away from him. Tomorrow has not promised to any of us. The rest of today is not promised to any of us. As a matter of fact, one of these billionaires. And this is based on first This is based on the podcast. This is also The article Guardian was based on a BBC radio series. A technology reporter and psychologist Alex Krotoski a woman, and she is fascinated by

all this stuff and fall short, hook line and sinker. She said, it took us ages to find somebody who would talk to us. Strangely, people who take blood from the young are a bit reserved. Who would think who would think that they would be reserved about that? Yeah, doctors have told Johnson that he has the heart of a thirty seven year old and the

lungs of an eighteen year old. Well, I don't know, but he better be careful about the blood that he gets because we've seen a lot of people or younger than that dying of heart attacks after the Trump SHOT's been gone

around the world. But he says, as she's going through all this stuff and doing the research, this BBC reporter says, it felt like all these sci fi dreams could be made possible, including technological singularity, the merging of man and machine, right, technology merging with humanity to create a post human existent existence. Ultimately, she says, this means that we shall be immortal beings. Well, you already are, lady, You will live forever,

in one form or the other. And yet they're trying to make this fallen world their home as long as they come hang onto it. Yeah, like I understand, nobody wants to die. It's like birth and death are difficult transitions, aren't they? For all of us? And and yet this is a fallen world. This is the world that's been cursed three times. So plasma transfusions to prevent aging became a reality in twenty seventeen with Jesse Karmazin's vampiric

startup Ambrosia. Hundreds of clients with a median age of sixty would pay eight thousand dollars to take part in what was essentially still a trial. The FDA pushed back on it, but these people are still talking about it, she says. They're quick to add that this isn't going to have a Benjamin Button effect. This is not geared to make old people look young. What we're talking about, she says, here is really kind of more of a fountain

of middle age. Oh yeah, that's where you want to stop the clock, right, middle age, not youth, not a fountain of youth, but middle aged. Last year, Amazon founder third richest person in the world. Jeff Bezos reportedly invested in Altos Labs, a startup working on cellular rejuvenation programming. PayPal co founder Peter Thiel meanwhile, has invested millions in the Methuselah Foundation, a nonprofit that aims to make ninety the New fifty by twenty thirty.

Wow, what's the numbers there? It's the numbers? Got I guess? Well, here's a number for you. Nine sixty nine. That was the age that Methuselah lived. You know, you may live to be as old as Methuselah. You know, you may make nine hundred the New fifty, but you're still gonna die and stand before God one day. And what are you going to say about it? You know, each of us has gone their own way. Each of us needs to do something about that rebellion

with God, but we don't do it. And while they're talking about how they're going to live forever, how they're going to merge with machines. And of course, you know, just like Peter Thie, Elon Musk is all about that as well, merging with machinery. You have, As Jonathan Turley points out, a British court has ruled that a competent and conscious patient can be denied life sustaining treatment against her will. See, this is what the

common people get. The billionaires will get their life extension stuff. They'll get to feed on the blood of others and that type of thing to keep their miserable existence on this planet going as long as they can. But the rest of us, we will be ushered off into the hereafter sooner than maybe even we would like to go. And this is an interesting This is interesting in terms of the court case. Jonathan Turley teaches law, He writes columns about

these legal issues and everything. Always enjoy his all here. But this is what makes this interesting is the brazenness of the court system and the doctors. They say, well, she's competent, she's conscious, but because she's not following what we say to do, we're going to deny health treatment. Which Jonathan Truley doesn't connect the dots to what was being done in these sick houses we call hospitals, that's what the Germans call them, crunkin house, sick

house. Well, they became sick houses under the hospital death protocols of Donald Trump, and they were letting people die, refusing treatment to them for a wide arrange of things. He says in my tort k class often compare the different approaches and doctrines in the US and the UK. One of the most pronounced is the position and the authority of physicians on issues like consent and malpractice. This week produced a particularly striking example. Why do you think that might

be? Because would it be because they have government controlled healthcare? M Yeah, And as government exerts more and more control over healthcare, and as Trump set that precedent bar really much higher than it was before, bureaucrats controlling our healthcare and the name of public health. But now Fauci says, well, you know, when confronted with the idea that the mass stuff never worked, as he said from the beginning, Oh yeah, well maybe it doesn't work

for the public health, but it's for the individual. No, you did all this stuff in the name of public health, and now you're just again, like Trump, reinventing himself and lying about it. The right wing media is happy to point out the lies and the reinvention of Faucci, but they don't want to talk about how Trump has lied and reinvented himself. British doctor said Jonathan Turley are seeking to take a nineteen year old critically ill female patient

off intensive care, despite her objections and those of her parents. Unlike most such cases, the woman, known only as st is conscious, communicative, yet the doctors argue that she's not being realistic about her chances of survival from a rare disorder. Now a British court has agreed and ordered that she can be placed on end of life care against her will. Well, again, it goes back to the case of Terry Chavo. Take a look at that

but we saw. Can have we forgotten so quickly? Or are we not allowed to talk about the fact that they put do not resuscitate orders on people in the hospital because the hospitals are being lavished with cash to do what Trump and Faucci has Master Faucci wanted done. You know, Faucci do this, you know, and give them cash if they do that, you know. Yeah, sure, whatever you say, I've played for you. I won't

play it again today. I've played it the last two shows. The commercial that Trump did a clip clip after clip when he was running for president in twenty twenty. Clip after clip a Faucci praising him for doing every thing that FACCI told him to do a pathetic design. And of course a lot of these orders were, you know, put people on do not resuscitate, separate them from their family. Yeah, yet patients said no, no, I don't want No, we're gonna put you on do not resusitate, keep the

family away, because the family was pushing against that as well. Again, this is a disturbing case, and Jonathan Turley is right about this particular case, but it is heartily unique. These are the Trump rules for medical care now that he put in place. Yes, it's being extended by the Biden

administration, but it is the Trump precedent. Her deeply religious family has spent their entire life savings on her care, and they complained that a transparency order requested by the hospital barred their ability to give details on the case to help raise public funds. When they censor and they redact what you're allowed to say, they cynically call it a transparency order anything. But that What is so remarkable about the case is not that it is an infant or a comatose patient.

Because you know, we should be able to kill babies at will, right because we do that, We do that all the time. So we're not killing a baby. How many times I talked about the pro life issue. So, well, if you're going to kill a baby, you're going to kill people at all stages of life, at the end of life, even a nineteen year old. You either value life or you don't value it. The rest of it's just a number, you know, age is just

a number. It's the principle that matters. Two psychiatrists testified that she's mentally competent to make decisions about her own care. She is able to communicate reasonably well with her doctors and speech therapists that are there. But here's what the court said. Nevertheless, the judge found that she's mentally incapable of making decisions for herself. Why because quote, she does not believe the information she has

been given by her doctors. Well that applies to all of us for the last three years, doesn't it. If you don't believe the authorities, right, the public health authorities, or the authorities of the hospital or these other places, well then you know, we have to kill you. And so we have the legal authorities and the medical authorities are out there and saying, well, we're not going to even let you try anything else again. You can't have Ibramican, you can't have HCQ. These are the You know this

surprises him because they're so flagrant about this. But all these principles were established under the Trump regime and my judgment, because she does not believe the information she's been given by her doctors, writes, the judge. Absent that belief, she cannot use or weigh that information as part of the process of making the So information which has been shown to her is reliable and true. We know that because we know that, because I say so, because I'm science

that type of thing. The court has told her that. The Court has told that she has cognitive and communicative abilities to make such decisions. However, because the court disagrees with her desire to continue to fight to live, she is treated as effectively incompetent death by authorities. Cause of death put it down there, authorities, authoritarianism, both medical and legal. Now this is an

item of hope. This is both Democrats and Republicans agreeing in California that they're coming together, left and right, teaming up to fight sex changes for kids. In California. They said, the real question comes down to are you okay with remove help the body parts of a child? Are you okay with that? And do you realize then what that does to that chap for the rest of their life, the misery that they're in. How many of these

kids have now committed suicide because of bottom surgery. Activists in California from both political parties are banning together to put measures on the state ballot that would ban child sex change surgeries and ensure fairness in women's spaces. Protect Kids California filed three statewide ballot initiatives Monday, and the group leaders believe that they have bipartisan support on the issues. It's a group that was formed by a Republican man

and a Democrat woman. They filed three statewide ballot initiatives to ban child sex changes and puberty blockers, to keep men out of women's sports, and to require school officials to inform parents if a child wants to transition his or her gender. They said. The media and the California legislators make it seem as if it is a Democrat versus Republican issue, but it's not. I would say the majority of Democrats agree with us on this, said Sophia Lori.

A female rights activist who spoke at the announcement of the initiatives. Well, I think that remains me seen. What I am seeing is very much a polarization of political parties. I hope this is true. If it is true, and to the extent that it is true, we should welcome any of these people as co belligerence on this particular fight. Try to help these kids, to try to stop this. But again, you know, what about protecting the actual beauty of life? Do we really understand how precious life is?

This is a even more hopeful story from Live Action News. Marianne West was working at Lakeview Hospital in two thousand and one when she helped a mom to deliver a little girl named Kelsey. Twenty two years later that baby, that baby girl grew up to marry a boy named Tyler, who was Marianne's son. How about that she delivered the little girl that would later marry her son. Tyler and Kelsey were looking at Kelsey's baby photos together when they noticed

something incredible. Hey, that's my mom, Tyler said, And it looks like she was your nurse. Not only that, but she was the nurse who took Kelsey's footprints for her birth certificate. Kelsey said the bride I thought it was really cool. It made me feel grateful to know that I had this tie to my new family. I always wanted to have a good relationship with my future parents, and it also confirmed that I want to be with Tyler for the rest of my life. The two sets of parents met at

a pre wedding dinner, where Stacy thought that Marianne looked familiar. Kelsey had told me that Marianne was a labor and delivery nurse, and she and Tyler had joked that maybe she had brought me some ice chips when I was in the hospital. Stacy said, I thought the odds were slim that she would have been there, but in the back of my mind, I guess I

wondered could she be. Stacy further said that mary Anne stood out as her favorite labor and delivery nurse, so much so that she included her picture in Kelsey's baby book. She was with me the entire time, telling me, honey, it's going to be okay. When Kelsey was born, she handed her to me and said, welcome to the world, princess. This is what we're missing. You know, there's two ways that we can approach this

thing. We can show the people the horror of the procedure, what has actually involved, and the words of a person who watched it happen as the ultrasound technician. We can also show people the beauty of life of families. She said, twenty two years ago, I had this cute couple and labor. I remember she was really nervous because she was having her third baby. Three children under three. She said, I'm not ready for a third and

I don't know how the first two are going to handle this. And I had just given birth to my third a year ago and was just letting her know, you got this. It's fine. You see, that's what the Democrats, and it is the Democrats in most states. It's almost again. I hope that this is an emerging trend, but I am not hopeful that Democrats who have been so asconced in this cult of death are going to pull back from mutilating young kids, because they won't pull back from mutilating babies.

And they don't want counseling for people. They don't want words of encouragement. They don't want someone to come alongside them and say, yeah, you can do it, I've done it. They don't want other options for people. Even if you can't do it, there's adoption out there. They don't want that. And of course the Biden Department of Justice won't do anything about the people who attack and burn down these pregnancy counseling places either. Mary Anne explained

that the third baby she was talking about was her son, Tyler. It became Kelsey's husband when I was talking to Stacy and explained that to her. I just had my third baby and I'm a working mom, and I told that to her, and then that baby was Tyler, who married her daughter when she grew up. So we'll take a quick break and we will be right back using free speech to free minds. It's the David Night Show. Well, I want to say thank you to Rumble r C twenty twenty.

Thank you very much for the tips. But we all with unveiled faces. I can do things by taking a verse out of its context. Thank you. And on rock Fan James S, thank you very much for the tip, both of you, and joining us now is our guest. He has as I mentioned at the beginning of the program, he's a Chilean German lawyer with a Master's and Investments. He is a director of the Friedrich Hayek Chair in Santiago, Chile. He has been a visiting scholar in Stanford University's Hoover

Institution. His opinions have been published by The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, Quillet, Forbes, Newsweek, Washington Examiner. But he's had a lot of influence in Latin America. And when I saw this book here, the book that he's written is called The Street Economist, best selling book in Chile, Spain and many other Latin American countries, currently being published in five

different languages, and now it has been published in English. And when I saw that, I wanted to talk to him about it because it is The Street Economist, fifteen economic lessons everyone should know. And I really, as we look at this guy who just finished in the Primaries and Argentina, Javier Malay, I thought, well, you know, it's I wonder he was, you know, a Ron Paul type of libertarian terms of his economics and we got to get rid of the central bank and the problems that it's caused

and anything. And when I saw this, I thought, well, maybe he's one of the many, many people in Latin America that have read this book. You know, when the Wall Street Journal does a piece on Javier Malay, they just talk about his hair snob. But I would like to know what was on his mind, and regardless of whether or not he was influenced by this, this looks like a very good published, a very very good book. So joining us now is Alex Kaiser Barns von hohen Hagen.

Thank you for joining us, sir, thank you very much for having me. It is very interesting to see this, and we really do need to have some economic education in all these countries, and I don't know, perhaps more so on America than even in Latin America, because we've been so miseducated and disinformed in our school. So it's great to see something like the Street Economists. But let me begin before we start talking about what's in the book.

Do you have any idea if your book has had some influence with Javier Malay, or if I'm pronouncing his name correctly, or certainly perhaps with the people who voted for him. What do you think? Well, actually, have you end me? They presented my book in Argentina last year. Okay, well that makes sense. I could see the connection there. So he presented it right, and it is. He thinks he is one of the best books that has ever been written, aside General Introduction to Economics for general

public. Okay, we are good. I have to make a disclosure there. We are good friends, brothers, and I'm so to speak he I've been doing the same thing in Chile and other countries in our Amica that he has been doing in Argentina, and he cites my books in interviews on television and so on. So I now, how about in Argentina as well? Well? Then my hunch was correct. That's good. I'm glad to know that, because I really would like to know what is on his mind and

not just how he styles his heir. That's that's the Wall Street Journal. You think that they would want to talk about his economic theories. Because so they don't want to talk about his economic theories. We're got to keep people on the dark about that. But you have much to say about what is wrong with our centrally planned economy and why socialist is so ingrained in the younger generation, and how do we fix that? More importantly, how do we

fix that? I think the problem is economic illiteracy and it has always been the problem. If we remember the great economists a little bit Vone misses in the early twentieth century, he was saying that if people understood basic economics, you wouldn't have socialists around, because in order for people to believe all of this nonsensical ideas which sound very attractive, we have to accept that you need

ignorant people who don't understand anything. And you know, I have spent a lot of time in the United States and most German, and I have also been spending a lot of time in Latin America, and I see the same problem everywhere. It's most people don't understand economics, and especially young people, it's seduced by the messages they see on television, by the Paul Kruftman's of

the world and by the Stiglitz of the world. By the way, Stickltz has done an awful year of in Latin America supporting all our socialist dictators. It's unbellion. I wrote an for the Washington Examiner, and so I wrote the book because I thought, you know, I have to do something that people can read about economics without the math, without the graphs, without all

of this. Jergon that's for specialists, and it became a best setting book everywhere, and now even in Mongolia they went to publish now in Poland, now also in Russia and different countries. So I think, I, you know, I hit a nerve, like we say in German, because there was we were lacking something like this for explaining very simple terms to the general public. Well that's great, because you know, growing up, even being in school fifty years ago or whatever, they never taught economics to us.

We didn't get economics until we got into college. And because you said, things like math involved in it. So if you've got something there that is accessible to people without math, explains the principles to them. I always had a big issue we were taught and when we got economics, we were not

taught mess or high We were taught kanes kness. You know, the idea that you know, the money that the government spends, that there's no basis and reality that that it's it's never going to come crashing down on anybody. But you know, you have to manage your own personal stuff, but the government doesn't have to manage it. Stuff that kind of nonsense, and that always never really set well with me. Even with all the math and the hand waving. That never set well with me. But you're setting up with

us. As you explain at fifteen economic lessons, everyone should know it is really set up without a lot of math and general principles. Is how it was explained, right, tell us a little bit about that. Let's say, on positive economics, it means I describe how how the world works with zero math and not even footnote. So it's in hundred and twenty pages. I explained, for instance, price theory. In a couple of pages, I explained what capital is and how capital is formed, and why is it's

good for society to have a lot of capital enrich people. And on the other way around, I explain, you know, free trade and why is why it's important, and theory of innovation, all of that with very very simple examples. It's what miss is called crucial economics. You start with the individual and you know a parttery economy, and so you can explain, for instance, that prices are not formed because you have money. They are formed

formed because you have exchange. And even in a right parttery economy you would have prices. And so this is a very basic idea that many people don't understand really because I mean, no one teaches teaches these things and nowhere. I didn't learn anything about economics at school of university. I had to learn it after I had you know, I was, you know, my masters and PhDs. So this type of things have been have become very popular also

among different social classes, which is important as well. I'm in Chilia. This book has sold over fifty thousand copies in a year. It's it's the most old book in economy, I mean economics book in history, and it contributed to create a reaction against our current Marxist government. We have a communist government right now in Chilia, and and it was crucial in defeating the constitutional experiment that we had last year on September fourth. All these efforts that many

people did, including me. And so if you change how people think, then you change the politics of your country. And the problem we have is universities and media and all of the different instances that you know give credit to ideas are controlled by hardcore leftists. And so what do you expect. I mean, of course, the popularity of socialisms rising in the United States among gainst years, and also in Germany and other countries. They don't nothing.

They know nothing about the history of communism, they know nothing about socialism. I have been spending all of my energy in the last ten years fighting against socialism in Latin America, where you see Argentina with one hundred and fifty percent of inflation rate right now, ruined country that in eighteen ninety six it was a very liberal country, had the highest per capita income in the world, and now it's it's a it's a really at an example of everything you wouldn't

do. It's it's a disaster, a complete mess, almost fifty of a poverty rate, and it's it's it's one of the richest countries in the world that we can go on with Menezuela and other countries, I mean. And so it's very very thing for people to understand, isn't it that it can happen anybody anywhere, you know, especially in America, would never happen here, and yet it is happening here. As you pointed out, it's this

different social class. And I think it really goes back to Antonio Gramsey's idea of the march through the institutions and you know, taking over the institutions and it's pretty clear that they've taken over the institutions, educational, academic institutions, a governmental, corporate institutions. They've all been taken over by these leftists, socialist, Marxists, whatever you want to call them. But it's also when you look at it, it's like, you know, Pete Booty Gay,

which is my nickname for him, our the Department of Transportation guy. His father spent his entire life pushing the teaching of Antonio Gramcy, teaching it at Notre Dame. So these people really understand what they're doing. We just don't understand what they're doing. And they don't want us to understand the consequences of this. They don't want us to understand economics. And that's a key thing. I think. It's interesting you said that the book is only one hundred

and twenty pages. Is that correct? Yeah, it's I mean I wrote it and purposely, you know, a purpose very short, because people I couldn't read five hundred pages, but one hundred and twenty pages fifteen lessons each lesson like an average of four pages that you can read, and so it's very very easy, and it's a TELI I mean, it's also recommended by very important economists in the United States, Casey Muligan from Chicago University, Didri

McCloskey also them from Chicago. Then you have Pilgram really loved the book, and you have other Stephen Moore and other people recommending the book so well. I can't wait to read it. I usually I read a book before I interviewed somebody, But when I saw your bio there, I figured that you had to have something to do with via unless you know, are certainly the people who voted for them, you know what would have seen that. And that's the key thing. You know, we talked about being able to condense

it to one hundred and twenty pages. If somebody really understands a topic, that's the difficult whole thing is convincing it and explaining it to people concisely. And if you really do understand it, you can explain it concisely. And so that I think that's a really powerful thing. That's such a short book and so many different lessons in that short book without math, accessible to everybody. It's something that everybody out to have, especially homeschoolers I think should definitely

get this for their kids. Yes, I absolutely agree and I see how this is changing minds in Spain, in Latin American, Argentina, Chile, Colombia and different parts. Now it's in Germany. It's being a success also the book because it has been published in German, and so I think in the United States it will make a cruciate contributions for young people and other people, you know, under basic economics. And it's part of the bottle of

ideas that Hi was talking about all the time. And it's I've read gramch In, you know, I've spent a lot of time reading him. And I am glad you're mentioning the gram She because not many people in the United States, not even people who are trying to defeat the knows about Grunty. And this is the most leful Marxist thinker that has ever existed, in my opinion, because he really understood that it was not about the violent revolution like

Marx and Lennin thought. It was about, you know, colonizing people's minds. And when you do that through the march, I mean, using this long march through the institutions, then the system will fall apart on its own because people will will not want to have the system in the first place they

wanna, you know, will want to have something different. It's like what you've seen now with the woke movement, like the people trying to reply as the national anthem, people hating the flag, hating the ideas of the founding fathers. That's if they are successful with their cultural revolution, then you lose the United States. And if you lose the United States the States, you

lose the whole West. There is no other place, you know, where we can go or that could help, you know, countries that are being ruled by socialists, and so I'm very worried about the United States. For me, it is the key battle ground. And that's why I was, you know, so happy that it was published in English, because I want to join the fighting. I want to convey this message. I've lived in Germany, and i know how socialist sin think in Latin America, and I've

seen so many countries being ruined by leftist ideas. Even if chill which was the most prosperous country in Latin America, thanks thanks to the Chicago School. You know, of economics and people, they're Friedman and Harburger and all of them. They came, they made the reforms and until it became the most prosperous country Latin America. And now we have this Marxist regime again that is destroying everything. So why would you do that to your own country in the

United States. And we can't afford to lose, to lose this nation so well, and you have to know what were the things are late Le's talk a little bit about you talked about the fact that in Argentina one hundred and fifty percent inflation that has happening there. So what causes inflation? Well, it's very straightforward. It's the printing of money in order to you know, fund the physical deficit in Argentina. And it's I think it's the same for

it for every country. This is a law of economics, and of course you have it in the United States. It's not as pat as in Argentina. But you know the problem is that they started to destroy their free market institutions a long time ago and solve the problems that they were creating due to this new government intervention. They tried to solve it with more government in their

intervention. And what happened was that the more problems the government tried to solve, the more problems were created and of the spiral of interventionism, and in the end you have a country that this has completely destroyed its base, its productivity base, and then there is no growth, and then you have more social problems, and then you have to spend more, and then you you

take a lot of debt in order to give people things for free. And at some point people don't lend you more money anymore, and so you have to go to a printing press and you know they are running hot twenty four

seven because you need to get money from someplace. And that's how you end up with a fifty percent poverty rate and one hundred and fifty percent inflation rate, and you have six million people who are starving to death because they have nothing to eat in a country that produces a food for four hundred million people. Because one it's probably the most productive soil in the world and it's a

huge tree. But socialism ruins everything. And now, Habim Malay, what is really attempting is as sort of a revolution in the classical sense, going back to the roots of Albertian classical liberalist Alberti was the founder of the eighteen fifty three Constitution in Argentina. He was a classical liberal who admired the founding fathers Thomas Jefferson and James Madison and and and he was very much inspired. But they by their ideas and following this American model of freedom, Argentina became

the wealthiest country in the world at some point. Hey, this idea was work everywhere. And then you had Perron and the collectivists and the Keynesians and the socialists coming in and then they destroyed everything. Yeah, and of course you have two had part of the business lads profiting from this because you know, they get subsidists from government, they get brought us for import and exports, they get, you know, all sorts of benefits from this crony capitalist

system or pseudo capitalist system, fascist system. They out there and they support the baroness and kishners and this type of course people in the world. And this happens everywhere, not only in Argentina. And you know, when I look at American culture, what most Americans know about Argentina is avida. You know, they celebrated it as a like a Broadway musical, Don't Drive for Me Argentina. They made a celebrity out of these Marxists that destroyed that country.

And that's about the only thing that most Americans know about Argentina. And again that's because you know, our institutions have been taken over by the Marxists, and so they're going to celebrate other Marxists there, you know it kind of it kind of reminds me. You know, you're a street economists. I think you are kind of the Thomas Pain of Latin America. You know, as Thomas Pain changed minds in America at the time of the revolution.

Is common sense and explain things. I think that's the power of a book, the power of ideas to change things. It really is. Yeah, Thomas Pain is a great inspiration. I mean its common sense book or pamphlet was so decisive in you know, igniting the American Revolution. And I really believe in the power of ideas. I've seen it myself. We have created

a movement with a million followers in Latin America. I've become very popular in different countries in Latin America, as on Spain, and when I'm in Florida and Miami working around, people stopped me because you have all these or this my event's coming from it as well. As skeaping socialism or Argentine our different parts and they all know me. And so it's fascinating to see how you

can really win this war if you have enough people fighting it. And you have you know, you are engaging in this battle of ideas and and and that's why I wrote this book. And we have many people on our side, on our camp, but they write papers for journals and no one reads so and they don't go like That's why I like mist and Frequent so much, because he would go to television. He would do free to choose,

you know, he would go and face all the socialists. And you have now very good pre market economists, maybe not as charismatic as Freedman, but they prefer to stay in the Ivory Tower and write these papers. And that I think is not really contributing a lot to changing how people think. We need more public intellectuals doing this stuff. And I know that, you know, professional economists. If I wanted to get tenure, my book would be

useless for that. But you know, I don't care about tenure. I get about I care about having a world where we can live in freedom and we can have prosperity. I've seen too many countries in my lifetime being ruined by socialism. Venezuela is an example of that. I used to go to Venezuela when it was still working and now look at it, it's horrible. And Argentina the same thing. I remember going to Argentina when the pesto was one to one with the dollar and now like that, almost seven hundred pesos

per dollar. But the development it's massive. So this can happen very quickly. So I hope that that countries like the United States and learned a lesson and don't don't go down the wrong path. Yes, you were saying that, you know fifty percent party right. Do you have any idea what the median income is in Argentina or even the average you know average? I don't. I'm not sure, but I can tell you that. For instance, if you are a lawyer working for a big law firm in is one of

the best law firms, you are made probably five a month. Wow. Wow. Yeah, So it's very cheap. And I go to Argentina a lot. And because they because they have capital controls, you have to bring cash with you and so you exchange it in the parallel market in the black market. They called it the blue market. Yeah, they call it the blue market. It's very funny, and it's to pay for services is so cheap. I mean, it's it's insane things that are expensive, but services

people. You you can have someone, you know, a cleaning lady or someone you pay like five dollars per hour, three dollars per hour. It's like, it's like, it's very sad because young people are leaving in Argentina and they are going to Europe. Many of them have Italian passports, so they're going to Italy, Spain, and a lot of them are coming to the United States. If you go to Florida, for instance, Miami,

you would all restaurants, many restaurants. You speak to people, and there are all Argentinians who are working as waitresses or you know, bartenders or whatever. They have started. They have to start architecture or law or economics, and they are working there because they make more money doing that than working in Argentina. Wow. So so it's very sad to see whole generations being destroyed

by by this, you know, very homeful ideologies. Yeah, when you talked about the downward spiral of you know, the government comes in and it creates a problem, and then people turn to the government to create the solution of that, and it just that that creates this now weard spiral. One

of the things that concerns me is what I've seen in my lifetime. That used to be a hallmark of the left to think that the government is going to solve our problems, that has now been embraced by conservatives and by the right as well. And so you know, now with all this focus on you know, it's this mindset of centralized control, and we just need it's

not a problem to have centralized control. We just need to have the right people pulling the levers in Washington. So we need Republicans, we need Trump in power instead of Biden or whatever. And that's that's what the Republicans have bought into. And so you can't even have a discussion with people anymore about policies or about the flaws of particular candidate or president, because it said, well, who do you want to to to be present? In other words,

who do you want to do centrally controlled command control economy? You know, And that's a very scary thing. That's one of the reasons why a book like yours is so necessary. People have got to get out of this mindset that we're looking for the benevolent dictator. No, we're not looking for a dictator at all. We don't want to have a czar who's going to control our economy from Washington doing Yeah, that's what you up in Russia, by the way, and chick like that. And I think that's the problem

because the lesson of the Founding Fathers has been forgotten. They try to devise a system of government that would not enable good people to do as much good as they wanted if they had power, but that could prevent evil people or stupid people from doing all the harm they could do if they had a lot

of power. And this should be at the heart of all you know, I would say conservative or classical liberal people because or movement or philosophy, because as you say, this has been forgotten and now we are in the in a world, in the worse world. Because you know, if you create structures that enable the concentration of power, once you are not in power, you have loaded the weapons for your enemies. You know, it's unless you you think you are going to remain in power forever, which is impossible.

And even if you if you could do it, it wouldn't be healthy, it would be horrible. At some point you would generate problem into a tyrant then unless you believe that you will have these weapons loaded for your enemies once they come into power. And so that's why it's so dangerous, this mindset of centralized planning and control. And it's getting worse and worse with the war against GOSH and the CB disease and the new technologies of that are being put

in place in order to control us. Or we are resembling China more and more in the West, and no one seems to care a lot about this. And and that's horrible because we will end up living in a you know, sort of dictatorship, digital dictatorship with a human face. That will be the difference will be in the end, it will be the same thing. Yes, and you are yeah, all these people pushing this agenda, the World Economic Forum all and others. Yes, I agree that that's the big

threat. CBDC central bank digital currency. It is a it's not so much a form of economics as it is an open air prison, which is the way they design it. But I like what you had to say about a system that designed by the founders that a good person can't do as much good as they possibly could, but it prevents an evil person from doing that. That's kind of a corollary to what I've often said about the Justice department, a justice system that you want to make sure that whatever tactics you use,

again it's really bad people. You've got to be careful about that because those same tactics will be used against good people. Those two things kind of works as a corollary that that's a great one. I've not heard that before about the power of the presidency, but that is absolutely true. Talk a little bit about the idea of social justice, because it seems to me like this is fundamental to the marketing of Marxism today. Yeah. I wrote a book

many years ago. It's called The Tyranny of Equality, which was a best setting book in different countries. It's only in Spanish. But social justice it's a mirage. That's the expression that I used. It's a fallacy and it's being used by politicians all over the world in order to justify the growth of government that means the growth of their own power, with the pretense that they're

helping other people. It's a fallacy because it is you know, it's on the assumption that the results that you get in a free market system where people make decisions on their own, you know about what, you know, how they want to spend their money, and where they want to work and things like that, that these results are somehow unfair or unjust. But since justice is an attribute of human action, when you have a spontaneous order like the

market, producing certain results, the results cannot be unjust by definition. I can be unjust if I attack someone and I destroy someone's property, for instance, But if you have a lightning that destroys your house, this is you can't say that that's unjust. You can say that's and that you know, bad luck maybe, but it's not unjust because there is no human intention or action that created this or cost this destruction of property. And it's the same

with the market. It's a little bit of complex idea, but social justice in the end is being used in order to re distribute a lot of wealth and to make government grow and grow and destroy the pre market system with the excuse that you are bringing furness and justice where you cannot find it, and in order to do to achieve that you have to restrict economic freedom and personal liberties in the extreme if you if you go all the way with a social

justice, you know, you would have a totalitarian system. Because and there

are actually people who have written this, how we aqualize all opportunities? For instance, if you really argue that it is and just that you have unequal opportunities because some people have more money to pay for better education and things like that, how will you equalize, for instance, the inheritance that you have from your parents in terms of you know, I was taught German since I was our kid, so I had an advantage over other kids that weren't taught

our second language. And this is being studied by many now and neuroscientists that if you learn a second language since you are a kid, you have an advantage in the cognitive advantage over others. How would you equalize that? For instance? What about ay? There are actually some scholars writing papers about the selection of partners that we shouldn't have the freedom of selecting the partner that we are going to marry and having children because we tend to select people who are

alike. So elites tend to select people who are in the elites and thinks and so on, and that creates an unfair advantage over others. So if you go out of social justice, you end up destroying freedom completely. Yes, and you have a to talk Darian system in the end and high one against this. And so I believe it's a fallacy. And it's interesting you mentioned this because because lay in Argentina, he openly speaks against social justice in

the media on television. He has been doing so for fifth for five years already, I mean already end and he says it's the excuse that politicians use in order to control people's lives and to steal a lot of the money that they are also you know, confiscating via taxation in order to redistribute it. But in Argentina it's extremely corrupt. This happens everywhere, right in Argentina is extremely corrupt, corrupt, so you give the money to your friends or to

the interest groups that are helping you. So I think it's it's a myth and we have to get rid of it all together because it's a fallacy and it's creating a lot of harm, and it sounds rich. It's it's a we called it in German a conf The griff an it's like a fight, and the griff it means concept. It's a it's a fight concept. It is very useful for the left in order to destroy your arguments and to move

forward with their power agenda. But we have to fight it back because it's it's it's creating, it's creating enormous, you know, harm to people, especially the poorest people in America. They're very clever about the terms that they use, and they confuse it in people's minds. They talk about equity versus equality, uh, you know, and and so you know, you can talk about equality of opportunity. They want to talk about the equity of results

and redistributing it. And it's taken a lot of different forms. You talk about a fight concept and all they got reparations. And of course a lot of that goes back to the mid century Marxists like Bill Ayers, who started pushing this white privilege thing because they realized as the old school marks and as opposed to you know, the Gramsey guys, they wanted to have a conflict. They were not having success with class warfare, so they wanted race warfare.

And so that's a big part of what is happening in America. I don't know if that is. Is that something that's been done in Latin America different people groups, pitting them against each other by the government, I imagine it has It seems like that would be a technique that the tyrants would use.

Yes, but you know, we don't have this race issue, despite the fact that we had even more slaves in Latin America than than you know, in northern It's not that it's not an issue in Brazil, for example, and they had I think only Brazil had more slaves in the United States, and no one cares, No one speaks about this, and so so traditionally in Latin America divide that the populace tried to create this between the wealthy and the rest, you know, and oligarchs and the rest not so much

along along this identitarian type of issues, which I think are even worse because once you establish that the relevant I think is not the content of your character, and that you know idact you by your actions and the continent of your character, then you create a tribalist society which is completely I mean, it's incompatible with the promise of the Declaration of Independence and the Founding Vows and the whole American experiment. Because because the United States is about one idea basically,

which is moral equality. We have the same dignity as human beings, and we are all equally in the sense that we are we are all individuals who share the same dignity, and we have each one has a consciousness, and

we are responsive for our own, you know, decisions and acts. And so I can't speak with someone who is black, or who is gay or whatever, and I see someone who is equal to me because I can see that this despite the fact that we have these obvious differences, we are the same in terms of dignity and in terms of the way we we behave in the world, in the sense that we have a consciousness and that we are

responsible for all for our own decisions and acts. But the minute you say it's not relevant that you are an individual with your own consciousness, but the color of your skin is the relevant issue, then you create tribes. And these tribes are in existential opposition to the other tribes. So it's blacks against the white people and against the Latino's. Basically the white intersexual guy pressing everyone

else. That's that's more less the age. And when you start with this rhetoric, then of course you end up hating everything that why does the heterosexual people have created historically, which is basically question civilization, including the American experiment and so and curiously enough, this was the way that cal Schmidt, the famous legal scholar from you know that was close to the Nazis in Germany,

define politics. He defined politics as a conflict between enemies and friends and basically as a tribal thing where you would see the other group as someone who would threaten your existence and you would have to get rid of the other group. And this is the return to fascism. And people are not aware of this. And if you cannot have a diverse society like the American society unless you have a powerful story that unifies everyone, unless you have, you know,

common principles upon which everyone agrees on. And that's why Martin Luther, King, Frederick Godless, all of them said, yes, the principles of the Constitution and the collection of Independence are the right, the right principles, but we want them to be real also for us, which is a quickly fair

and and and it's an obvious development of the ideal of freedom. But once you now you have all these people telling you that these principles in themselves are racists and have created systemic racism in the United States, and therefore equality before the law is just an illusion. It doesn't work because you because you have all of this, all this invisible ways, that the system is racist. And therefore you have also to get rid of equality before the law because it's

giving you the impression that the system is fair. So it's deceiving you while the system is really unfair and systemically racist. And when you start down that road, you destroy a country completely, You destroy the American experiment, and you end up in civil war, or you end up in insperiment, strife between groups and the destruction of any election of freedom, I mean opity diversions. American society will never work with identitarian politics and an identitarian philosophy. It

would it would collapse into chaos. I assure you that. So we have to be very careful and fight back against this walk left, which by the way, I all inspired neo Marxist ideas coming from France and Germany, right from the Pool and France for school in Germany, it's all Marxism, cultural Marxism basically, yes, yes, that's a big part of the Franklins school

and entertainment. The rest of that. You know, as you're pointing out, that really has been that idea of equality, and it's very well said, you know, the idea that we're going to take that principle and we're going to expand it to everybody what Frederick Douglas and Martin Luther King wanted. And yet we have Joe Biden. The one thing I remember about him going

back decades when it was a Confirmation hearing is the Clarence Thomas. Joe Biden was absolutely outraged Clarence Thomas would have written about natural rights, which is the fundamental basis of this. You know, from Thomas Jefferson to Martin Luther King, it was about natural rights. And so you know, Joe Biden has been an authoritarian. He's been opposed to those fundamental principles of America for decades.

I don't know who's running his administration now, it doesn't seem to be like he's running it, but you know he he's the perfect person for this because it is what they are using to pull down America, the pillars that have held us up have been the ideas of individual liberty and equality before the law, and equality of opportunity, that type of thing. You know when

you talk about the it'll it'll pull America down into civil war? Are you familiar with the works of Strauss and how in terms of the Fourth Turning and things like that. In terms of the guys who coined the term millennial, they see that they had predicted back in the nineties that there would be you know about ever, they went back a long time through history about every eighty years, about every four generations, that be a major restructuring of society.

So they went back to you know, World War two and the Great Depression. Prior to that, they had the Civil War. Prior to that, they had the American Revolution. But they went back like five hundred years and

identified this pattern. They predicted that the mid two thousands it would be some kind of a worldwide economic crisis and they would start this chain that we were all essentially at this point in time, we're all sync together and globally and the same cycle that it would kick off this global push that would be completed just before twenty thirty. I've always thought that it was very interesting that they picked the year twenty thirty for this, and I think they're very cognizant of

this cycle of history. And you know, you look at what people are doing in Silicon Valley, pushing universal basic income, pushing central bank digital currencies, and all the rest of this stuff. It seems to me like they're cognizant of this and they want to have this kind of chaos that makes it easier for them to restructure society in the same way that things happen with the

industrial revolution or the grarian revolution. What do you think about that in terms of time times that we're in. You know, I'm not sure because you have so many technological innovations coming, like artificial intelligence, and you have criptual sphere, and you have all of all of those things in robotics. No one's really sure what is going to happen. Is artificial intelligence going to be able to control us all is? It's it's a debate we're having now.

So it's very hard to make predictions in that sense with a time framework, although some people like ill mask I think I've read that he said in five years or seven years, we will have artificial general intelligence and it will take over if I'm not it will be the end the end game for us probably, I'm not sure. I hope it doesn't come to happen. But but

what I think it will happen for sure is that polarization will increase. And now we have the new technologies where you have the deep fakes, and so you can't even know if someone who is I don't know really now, I couldn't know if I'm I'm speaking to you because you could be about our artificial intelligence. You know, it happened to the major of Berlin in Germany that

she believed that she was from years ago. She was speaking to to the major of Kiev in Ukraine, the Klitchko, the former boxing champion, and when she left the meeting, her advisor's game and told her it wasn't Klipko and he was speaking with it was the same voice. It was everything the same in Russian because she spoke Russian. And you know, so so this is going to we have dramatic effects on the public sphere and it's going to

polarize I think even more. The our society is like social networks like Facebook and Instagram and in Twitter played a huge role in creating a divide that didn't exist before. So not everything has been positive, and I think this is

going to be to get even worse. And that's why I worry so much that the immortal and eternal principles that inspired the American independence and experiment, if you want to call it like that, remain alive, because the only thing that will save us, it's people with clear ideas in their heads and the

and the right values. Otherwise, you know, all these different factors with with will play a role in destroying us and or turning turning us into something like China or Russia, because if you have an autocright, probably it's easier to control everything. So yeah, you know, when you George Gilders looked at the technological people in Control and Silicon Valley, and he's referred to them as neo Marxist, and I think it's not a coincidence that these people are

pushing universal basic income. We had Michael Bloomberg running for president. He made that same statement. He said, look, you know, we've had people used to do farming. We can replace them with machinery technology. And then we had the industrial revolution, and then he says, now the smart ones of us are looking at how we're going to take everybody's job, and now we've just got to figure out how we're going to pacify people to keep them

from grabbing guillotines. That's what he had to say, to keep them from grabbing guillotines and coming after us. So there is a sense that, you know, they want more and more centralized control, and that's why it's so important for us to understand the importance of decentralization and understand, as your book

points out, economics and human values, and not accept these substitutes. I mean, we look at how artificial intelligence is being used, perhaps we need to change it from artificial to authoritarian intelligence, because it's increasingly being used to monitor and to spy on people, and now it's being weaponized for censorship in

real time. So these are just tools of bad human nature, and I think we have to fight that with understanding human nature, understanding the systems, and understanding why things were set up the way they we're in America because human nature hasn't really changed. Our tools have changed radically, but human nature has remained the same, and the nature of tyranny and the nature of freedom has

remained the same too. Hasn't it out. Yeah, And I believe that's why freedom is more important than ever that we all endorse this cost for individual liberty because technologies make it very easy or centralized authority to get to destroy our freedoms. I mean, if you if you really read the classical books and fictional like Always nineteen eighty four or Ray Bradberr's Fahrenheit, you know, Aldo Huxley Brave New World, these are all dystopias, totalitarian dystopias where technology plays

a crucial road. Without technology, you couldn't have these surveillance states this, you know, absolute control over people's lives. So I'm very worried because I see a trend in the West of using these technologies in order to destroy privacy. In the center, the government will know everything. I mean, the last thing that we I mean that they will come up with is like putting cameras in our bedrooms and things like that. It's just is the only thing

that you know, they have not done yet. But at some point they will have a big data working on us, and they will know exactly where we are at any minute, you know, and what we're doing, what we're buying, what we're selling, what illnesses. We have everything they will know, and that's the minute when we have lost our freedoms. Yes, because it will be very easy for them to control us when they have all this information, and the machines will do it for them. We have to

stop it somehow. Now, let me ask you so and so you know and and you know, while we're talking about liberty and we're talking about economics, of course, the crux of that matter is the push for central bank digital currency. And we know that's being pushed in every country of the world as some level of development. And you know, a couple of questions. First of all, what is the status of that in Chile and in Argentina, Brazil, Latin America. What is the status of central bank digital currency

there in those areas well. The Chilean cent should Bank has come out with a project in order to create digital pasol. Uh So, I've been told that this is just a plan, and they were not they are not going to do it, but I don't I'm not sure. Once answered, the European Central Bank wants to do this, and when they start doing that,

all the central banks will follow because they all meet every years. The presidence of the Central banks in the world, and they went all to m T. Harvard or the school, so they are sort of from the same you know background and their friends more or less, and they need and they push the same agenda everywhere are their issues to deal with. But I'm sure that at some point it will be also something that they want to They will wanna

try there over there. But if the United States States does not get on board with it, because there are states like Floria saying no, we are not doing it, then it's harder for the whole world Western world of these two to implement these central bank digital currencies. There will be countries I will do it. I think Europe will do it, but Europeans don't really appreciate freedom so much so they don't care. And some lad press will try to

do it, but not all of them. But the United States gets on board with this, and you have a digital dollar and so well, and then I think the whole world would follow. It's very I just stop it. Then. Yes, it sounds like they're telling the people the same type of thing that they're telling us that you know, don't worry about it. Even though we call it fed now, it's not really happening now, it won't happen until Congress gives us the OKA or whatever. And as you have

people tried. The other part of it is we know what they want to do, regardless of what they say. We know what's really in and their plans and in their heart. But the other side of this is the awareness

of the people, and that's the thing that concerns me about it. When we have polls in America and they ask people about CBDC, there's not really a lot of opposition to it. But if you go down the list and you talk about the different things, you know, rationing people's food usage based on their carbon credits and all the rest of stuff, stopping people from being able to buy stuff, reemptively tracking everything they do, being able to confiscate

money, putting time limits, putting geolocation limits on where they can spend money, and all the rest of the stuff. People hate it when you explain it a bit by bit, but there's not much awareness of the thing itself. And even when you had DeSantis taken on, as you mentioned it said,

well, we're not going to allow it. We're going to prohibit it being used in commercial transactions by changing the UCC code and saying that CBDC is not going to be allowed, not an Americans CBDC, not a foreign CBDC. He does this press conference, calls a big brother digital money, and the mainstream media. At the end of the press conference, all they want to do is ask him questions about Trump's indictment. So, I mean, you have to shut this stuff down. That are the key issues. And

so I guess that's a question. Is there any awareness, because there's not enough here in America about the evils of CBDC. Is there much awareness in Latin America by the population there about the CBDC. You know, I think nine ten people have no idea what CBDCs are. And this is even in Europe or United States. In Latin America more or less the same, No, because we have not developed as much. It's harder in Latin America to get rid of cash altogether. You have huge sectors of the economy that are

informal. People live out of you know, being able to pay with bills, physical bills, and so it will be hard for them to get rided. In Mexico, for instance, or in Colombia or even in Chile to completely get rid of physical money, and that's an advantage of not being as advanced probably, But in Sweden, for instance, they I've already gotten rid of cash more or less. I don't think they have a CBDC, but

it will come, I'm sure, Oh yeah, yeah. And so we have to explain this because people are not aware and most people don't even know really what money is all about. And I have a lesson about that in the book. You know what is money and how it comes into existence. But we have to speak about this again and again. I think the scientist is doing a great job, but we have to, you know, bring more people into this because only that change, only CBDCs, if that were

successfully introducing the United States, would destroy most of your freedoms. Yes, I mean, it would become really a serf of the state, and we we can't allow that to happen. And as I say, if the United States States doesn't do it, and it's much harder for other countries to follow to do it because the financial system, the core of the finential system is

the United States. The reserve currency of the world is still the dollar, so it will be harder for our central banks in other parts of the world to do it. It's certain. Possibly it will be harder, but if the United States does it, then automatically everyone would do it. I agree.

Yeah, Let's let's talk a little bit about the state of the black market economy as they call it, the blue market economy, you know, because that is the sort of thing that I think increasingly Americans who are concerned about this, who do understand about CBDC, we look at it and we say, well, you know, what is our fallback position if we lose politically in this, and that's really a black market economy, a black market

economy where will there be paper cash? Is that how it's operating? I presume in Latin America is gold and silver is at a factor there in Latin America for people to or is it? You know, how do they give us some idea of what the the black market the blue market economy looks like it works. It really worked with a dollar everywhere it's it's in Venezuela,

it's the dollar. Venezuela has a dollarized the economy basically now and not officially, but you know, everyone can we use the dollar Argentina as well. Actually Argentinas have I think it's the second tentry in the world with more dollars in cash after the United States, because everything is dollarized. You go, you buy a house and you bring of course you do. You do not declare the real value that you are selling it for because then you have to

pay very high taxes. So you declare a much lower value that is paid to you in passive but eighty percent is paid to you, and and and cases with dollars, and so you get like a million dollars and you have an under a mattress at home and this is this is literally the case. You have it well in a safe at home or whatever, but you have the cash. But that's because the dollars still work, and it's you know,

it's not a CBDC has not become a type of currency. The day it becomes a CBDC type of currency, probably we will start using gold or something like that. I get silver, and the same will happen maybe with people in the United States. I mean you would have your own currencies in different states, probably based on silver, like going back to the past, like it used to be the case. Because I don't see away around that. You don't want politicians to control how you spend your money, when and

where, and to know everything you are doing. Like you will not be able to buy a you know, something from a pharmacy without the government knowing that you are ill, you know of cancer for instance, or you know. I mean they will know everything like and so I guess there will be a reaction and against it, and probably will be a issue in terms of

states versus the federal government. So it can't be thangerous as well. That is a key thing I think for Americans, because Americans have never had really much experience with a black market economy at all, and so we're at a disadvantage. I've talked to people who've lived in other countries and it's like, oh, yeah, you know, they there's always this underground black market economy

of barter or you know, American dollars or things like that. Jim Rogers years ago wrote a book Investment Biker, and he went around the world on a motorcycle and talked about what he saw. And he said one of the ways that you could measure the corruption and a given government was by the difference

between the official exchange rate and the exchange rate on the street. So I imagine that's pretty big in Argentina, right, the difference between US to exchange rates, right, yeah, yeah, one hundred percent difference or more difference or more. It's like it's insane, Yeah, but this is this is true. We are used to in Latin America. We are used to I call the official economy, which is the politicized economy where politicians make rules and

interview all the time. It's the politicized economy. And so we we go around that and and and we use the Argentina is very funny. It's like, I mean, it's stats on the one end, but it's very funny on the other hand because you you go to the pest hotel in Argentina and you pay in cash like chunks chunks of cash, like really a kilo and pesso because the highest i mean the highest nominated build they have is like a thousand pesto, which is like two dollars. And so if you go to

a good hotel and you you stake it for a week. I've done it many times, and you have to pay like two thousand dollars. In the end, for instance, you have to call for a guy who operates in the blue market. He comes to the hotel in dis guise and he brings you the cash, you give him the dollars, so you have like a ton of pessos and you go to the to the reception at the hotel and they have these machines where they can count the pessos like in the banks,

you know, and you don't play with your credit card. So everyone, and this is even at the Four Seasons, like it's you know, everyone accepts the fact that you cannot play by the rules of the game because otherwise everything would be destroyed, and so everyone tries to survive. And we are people who we are survivors in Latin America to some extent, so we are

more used to that. But I wonder what will happen in the United States used to doing that, and also in Europe, what would happen when you have politicians controlling everything in the end, would you just would you just say, oh, it's okay, Like I'm now like a Chinese citizen, I don't care. I don't think so I think there will be a rebellion.

So it's going to be very difficult because people have been weaned into this idea that we're just gonna play past pay with plastic for everything, and you know that is and that's what's happened with Sweden. They just wanted to, you know, not carry cash at all. Once you start going down that road to cashlessness, that gets to be a really dangerous thing because now you don't have the option of that. But yeah, that's pretty that is amazing.

That's an amazing story about what that looks like. It has been so interesting to talk to you. Thank you so much. And again, the book is The Street Economist fifteen economics lessons that everyone should know. Only one hundred and forty pages, no math and it folks, this is a book that everybody needs to educate themselves on because this is how they exploit us through our ignorance. Alex Kaiser, Barrens von Hohagen say your name correctly, is that

GREIGT. Yeah, it's pretty close. Okay, thank you so much. It's been a pleasure talking to you, and I hope people do pick up this book. We really do need that education here in America desperately. Thank you so much, sir, very last, thank you. As you heard him talk about that, you know, just remember Tony Arderban our sponsor here and he set up David Night dot Gold take you to Tony Ardban's Wisewolf dot Gold. It's going to be a painful transition if they're able to pull this

off politically, and quite frankly, I don't see. You know, we're losing the fight to stop these people in many ways, and so we have to take these responsibilities on ourselves. So we have to take the responsibility to decentralize our lives and not make ourselves dependent on their system. And so we need to opt out. We need not comply with that. This is as

important as not complying with the mask and not complying with the vaccine. They're always trying to pull us in to their open air prison and their identification system and their privilege. You know, they're they're granting you a privilege to do everything, and so we need to we need to push back on that. Privilege needs to be a dirty word to us as it is to them. They talk about white privilege and your privilege and this, and that. We

don't want privileges. We want rights. Our rights come from God, and we don't want privileges that are granted by government. And so that means that we're going to have to take action to do these things on our own, and it is important to listen to the experiences of people who have lived under communism. I grew up in Tampa, and I knew so many people who had escaped, you know, Cuba as a communist Cuba, and the parents of the kids that I knew that were Cuban, they were radically anti communist,

just as anybody who comes from Eastern Europe is radically anti communist. But we don't want to learn that lesson the hard way. It's been said many times that experiences an expensive school, but it's the only one that a fool will attend. Well, we don't want to have to go to that school as much better for us to clip out of that test by doing our own

research, doing our own preparation. And so an important part of that is making sure that you're going to have a way to operate outside of that system, that they're doing everything they can well all the strings to put that together. And one of the biggest things that we have to understand is that we don't want to fall for this mental trap of thinking that our problems can be solved by having the right person in a highly centralized government regulan was right when

he said government is not the solution. Government is the problem. The presidency is not the solution. The presidency is the problem. And so keep that in mind some of the things I try to stress to everybody. Okay, well, that's it for today's broadcast. Thank you so much for joining us. Let me tell you the David Night Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night Show

right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else, You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at the David Nightshow dot com. That's a website.