3Jan24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show. As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Wednesday, the third of January. You're of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to take a quick look at the news, but we're going to get into developments in

the election. It's going to be a long year for me. I've already got people who have been longtime listeners and supporters upset with me for criticizing Trump, and I have to wonder what were they hearing for the last three years. But we're also going to take a look at who is behind CBDC, the different banks and crypto organizations that are pushing this very hard, and what

it means for us. And we'll be joined in the third hour by Ryan Christian of the Last American Vagabond. He has been on this fluoride think for a very long time and it is finally coming to trial this month, and so we're going to get an update on that, as well as some other things he's been tracking. We'll be right back. Well, the Epstein list

was supposed to be released yesterday. We were told it didn't happen, and so bablin Bee has a story about that the Epstein list hangs itself moments before its release. A shocking turn of events, Epstein list was found hanging in a secure document storage facility this morning. This is such a tragedy for many of us who desperately wanted to know who was on that list, said security expert Hillary Clinton. Now will sadly never know. My thoughts and prayers are

with the family of this Epstein list. May it rest in peace. Well, it is kind of interesting. We saw with the Christmas break that Tucker is now talking about the Epstein murder in prison. You know, it's kind of like Building seven. He said, you can't do anything about Building seven. Can't talk about that or you'll get fired. Well you've been fired now, Tucker. Why don't you talk about it. Tell us what you think,

point out what's going on. People are listening and they're wondering what you think about this, unless maybe you're not fired, maybe you're still working for the CIA. But Representative Birchett here in Tennessee says he expects the Epstein client list cover up to continue. He says, what I want is the client list. You know you've got these skeevy old dudes that everybody says, well, they've gone and had sex on this island. What's the big deal.

Well, no they haven't. They've done an act of violence against a child, and they need to be burned on that. He said, that's the list that we need. And he said, I hope they get burned, every one of them. You know, the Bible's pretty clear on what God thinks of people who mess with a child. I think the American public needs to stand up and do something right finally, and man that both sides of the isle we need to wash our hands of this deal. He says,

I don't care which side of the isle you're on. If you are on the Epstein list, you should pay the consequences. Really, we don't care if it's Republican or Democrat. We don't care even if it is Trump. Trump. There he is a Trump and Millenia, Jeffrey and Giselaine. And here they are. Looks like Millennia is enjoying herself there as we go back and forth, the four of them a foursome right there. Burchett said. He also accused of Senator Dick Durbin of perpetuating the cover up to protect his

friend Bill Clinton. Well, you know again it's Clinton. There's people like RFK Jr. Who on the plane, and of course Trump Trump who had him just on the plane, but he was also at Trump's parties. And Kevin Spacey, who Tucker interviewed in character to try to bring back his career. I guess Kevin Spacey not only his connections to Jeffrey Epstein, but his

connections to Davos, the King of Davos. He was, you know, he was entertaining all of them on an annual basis, deeply tied to all of those people, very much like another actor Malcolm McDowell, who has played in this X rated Caligula, who is in Clockwork Orange and all the rest of this stuff. It's just it's interesting, isn't it. It's kind of like, I don't know if these guys are good actors or not. Maybe they're just like John Wayne who always played the same character everywhere he went because

he's playing himself. Maybe Malcolm McDowell and Kevin Spacey are playing themselves, and

maybe Trump and the GOP is playing you as well. They don't want to talk about his involvement as a matter of fact, the only people want to talk about it is a left press, And I thought it was very interesting to see that Newsweek headlines Trump Donald Trump flights on Jeffrey Epstein's Alita express what we know and they talk about it, and of course they say, well, we suspect he's there, but we don't have any evidence of it yet.

And then they say the same thing at the very end of the article is one little paragraph saying, oh, we don't know anything about Bill Clinton either, Right, that's their only mention. But the most the entire article from Newsweek is focused on Trump and Epstein, Whereas when you look at all the Magabird press, you know, Breitbart, Info, Wars, WND conservative press, you will see it's all about Clinton. They don't mention Trump.

Isn't that interesting? I really do hope that we have something like what Andy Birchett is saying, we need to burn these people regardless of their political affiliations, and yet the press is not doing that. We have a press that is so incredibly partisan that even on something like this, even on pedophilia,

they tow the line. I got to say, you know, going back years and years and when we look at Dennis Hastard, longest serving GOP Speaker of the House, a wrestling coach, pedophile in high school, the GOP reached out to him and had him run for Congress. I mean, what you know, I'm not saying that you can't run for Congress as a wrestling coach, right, but I suspect that his primary qualification was that he was blackmailable, and so they collessed around him, colles around him, and then

they made him speaker for a very long time. And they had their page scandals of Republican congressman who was accused of doing pages miners in congress or sex. And you had Dennis Hastert go on with Rush Limbaugh and they just blew it away as partisan criticism. And there was two scandals that were like that, and Dennis Astert would go on with Rush Limbaugh and they would explain it away, this is just partisan stuff. No, you're excusing this conduct as

partisan. And I don't know. I didn't listen to Rush much of the time. After Dennis Hastert was charged, after it was found out that he was being blackmailed by this guy, he was charged for taking his money out and trying to avoid detection, taking the money out structured withdrawals. That's not a crime, should not be a crime. It is against their law, but it is not a crime. Should never be a crime. There's no excuse for a law like that. But that's what they used to put him

in jail. And the judge even when he put him in jail, he even referenced the pedophilia. You need to get rid of that statute of limitations, and we need to come after. And the reason they don't come after, the reason they don't get rid of the statute of limitations is because of people like Dennis Aster and Donald Trump and Bill Clinton and RFK Jr. And

the rest of them. So, yeah, it is a truly amazing to show how partisanship and the worship of men in power can blind you to the most heinous acts, isn't it. Trump's son, Eric says Newsweek is also listed on a flight in nineteen ninety five. He would have been eleven at the time. He says, so again, that's he's a minor. But so perhaps that wasn't about any of that, but they bring that up in Newsweek. They have every little detail about Trump's life, just like the conservative

press will have every little detail about Bill Clinton being there. Trump and Epstein were associates for years in the eighties and nineties. In a two thousand and two interview with New York Magazine, Trump said, I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy, lots of fun to be with. It's even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do. Many of them are on the younger side, no doubt, he said, Well, you know,

he was also friends. Trump was with alex Acosta, the guy who prosecuted Jeffrey Epstein, the guy who worked out a sweetheart deal with Jeffrey Epstein's two lawyers, Alan Dershowitz, who's now a big Trump supporter and defender, And with Ken Starr, who's now deceased. But ken Starr went on to he had essentially covered up for Bill Clinton. Isn't that interesting? You know the degrees of separation. You got Ken Starr who's brought in as a special

prosecutor for Bill Clinton. He ignores all the financial irregularities, he ignores all the credible allegations violence and rape against women. He focuses on Clinton committing perjury about a consensual affair with Monica Lewinsky. That's the basis of it. Ignores all the rest of the stuff, all the crime, corruption, sexual assault, and rape was ignored by ken Starr. And then the next time he

shows up in a big public forum is to defend Jeffrey Epstein. And kin Starr, who was touted as this big Christian, goes on to Baylor, which is supposed to be a Christian school, and as president of Baylor, he covers up for the football players rape or ledged rape or whatever. I don't know how that case turned out. And then they kicked him out and so Alan Derschwitz Alex Acosta was brought back to be the labor secretary and Trump's

first pick for labor secretary. But I'm sure there's no connection at all between Trump and Epstein. Right, all of you Trump supporters out there, you're telling me, oh, you just hate Trump. You're right. I do hate Trump. I hate what he has done. I really do. There have never been any suggestions that Trump had sex with other women who were trafficked by Epstein. Clinton also has denied knowing about Epstein's offenses or visiting the island

with no flight logs existing suggesting otherwise. Says Newsweek as we're about to see this stuff released a little preliminary leak talking about I forget how many times it was, was it seventy five, one hundred and fifty times? Whatever it was that Bill Clinton is listed in the flight logs. And so after Epstein was taken into custody in New York twenty nineteen, Trump changed his tune. Well, I was not a fan of his. I can tell you that. Well, he was a fan of Alex Secosta, he was a fan

of Dershwitz, and he was a fan of Jeffrey Epstein for decades. So as we look at the corruption in Hollywood and people like Kevin Spacey. Now that Mickey Mouse is in the public domain, the early Mickey Mouse, the Steamboat Willie Mickey Mouse. On twelve one am of the New Year, one minute past midnight, you had a trailer come out of a Mickey Mouse horror film. This is where Hollywood is sex, violence, depravity. Isn't it amazing? You know Winnie the Pooh when it went into the public domain,

why they do? They did a horror film, a real schlocky horror film, which is probably what this is as well. Winnie the Pooh blood and honey. Well, now they've got a Mickey Mouse horror film because we have these characters that used to be portrayed as wholesome. And of course Disney is probably kicking themselves or not thinking of making a Mickey Mouse and Winny the Pooh horror film themselves, because that's where they are. Yeah, maybe they could

have turned it into some kind of a sex depravity thing with Disney. After all, these are animals identifies humans, right, the original trends species. I guess Mickey's mouse Trap is the name of this new piece of filth. They use clips from the nineteen twenty eight animated classic steamboat Willie shown interspersed with newly shot footage that tells the story of a mask of a mouse mask wearing killer who stalks college age kids at an arcade. Well, at least they

point out that people who wear masks are insane. Right, That's that's one thing that we can learn from the last few years, isn't it. I thought it was interesting that George Soros, the guy who has been opposing law enforcement and district attorneys and spending millions of dollars to put in district attorneys that are going to turn criminals loose to create chaos on our streets. He was

swatted. He was swatted. George Soros was swatted. In other words, somebody makes kind of a prank, call a false accusation, and he gets a swat team. Well, I thought that was perhaps interesting. Well he now uses resources to stop these swat teams out there, because they really have gotten out of hen. I've got a report here about a family and I'll get to this in a moment after we take the break, and we'll come back with politics. But it's about a family who went to January the sixth,

and you will not believe what they did to them. They didn't do anything but the swatting that happened against them, And again it was just as illegitimate as somebody calling up and making a false claim about somebody, except that this false claim is coming from the Biden administration in the Department of Justice, and it's horrific what they did to them. It is a practice that needs to be ended. Except that what we're going to see is as this police

state, the surveillance state increases. Here's a good example of it. This is from just the news. Censorship concerns rise over state and local governments registering their domain names with SISA, and we have to be concerned about this again, the corruption from the federal government. We have got to get people at the state and the local level who are going to stand for the constitution and individual liberty because the fish is riding from the head down and Washington is far

too gone. This is again white people say, well, you don't like Trump and you don't like by, Well, who do you like. I don't like any of them. Frankly, I don't trust any of them, and neither should you. You should never trust any person in politics. As a journalist, I'm not interested in endorsing anybody because that is an element of trust and when you do that, you get burned, and rightfully so, you need to be skeptical. You need to take a look at what they

do and look at SISSA. It has now come under height and scrutiny in recent years for targeting disinformation through its Disinformation Governance Board. It works with big tech to shut down on popular information about COVID, or about wars, or about any narrative that they've got going on. And if you remember, CISSA was an integral part of Trump of Alex's CIA source, Steve Pachinnik, who was using that to kick off all this January the sixth stuff. Two days

after the election, he talked about a sting. He said CISSA was working with Trump to put blockchain, watermarks and all the ballots and all these places. They knew who had cheated, and they had already sent out twenty thousand National Guard and two days after election he said, we've already had tons of people arrested. All that was a lie, every bit of it was a lie, but incorporated CISSA in there. Now, SISSA was supposed to guard

us against cyber attack. But who guards the guardians? That's always been the question, you know, James Madison put it. He says, well, because men are not angels, we need to have government. But because government is going to be run by men, you know, how do you protect

against that? That's the age old question of who guards the guardians. Once you put these people in power, they will use these tools that you gave them to protect us against us. They will become instruments of tyranny, not just in foreign wars, but against domestic wars, against tactics such as terrorism

or cyber attacks. I think It's interesting, you know that there was this Japanese plane crash that happened, and when you look at this, I don't typically cover you know, earthquakes and fires, and you know the if it bleeds, it leads on most of the media stuff. I'm not interested in that type of thing typically. But there's a backstory to this. And here's what it looks like. You said that explosion off in the distance, and

then you see a plane going that is on fire. It completely incinerated this commercial jet that had three hundred and seventy nine people on board, and yet

nobody died on that. But the plane. The reason that there was that fiery crash was because there was a Japanese Coast Guard plane that was at the end of the runway and it was getting ready to do some relief work or something about the earthquake that had happened, but they were parking the wrong place or something, and that was not picked up, and as that plane landed, it struck that and so the big jetliner, which then was completely incinerated.

Everybody was able to get off, all the crew, all the passengers were able to get off, but everybody on board the Japanese Coast Guard plane died. The reason I bring that up is because we're talking about cybersecurity, and if you recall a few months ago, we had a situation which was the first time since nine eleven that all planes were grounded in the United States and it was about twelve hours. They said it was not a cyber attack.

It was. I'm absolutely certain it was because there is a system and it's relevant to this plane crash here. The no TAM system is what we call it, and what it does is it sends out messages to planes if there is some obstruction on the airport, or somebody is in the wrong place or something, or if there's been some incident to give a heads up. Now that might not have come into play with this. They might have just

been mispositioned and the air traffic controllers didn't understand it. But you do have the no TAM system to prevent something like that from happening. If somebody is all on the runway or something that you put that out as a warning that system was shut down. I think that system was shut down as a cyber

attack. And the reason I think that system was shut down as a cyber attack is because after about twelve hours of planes being grounded, it came back online and within an hour you had the no TAM system taken down in Canada as well. But without the not tam system, they stopped all the flights because they didn't want to have something like that Japanese plane fire there. And that's the issue behind so much of these cyber attacks. They will attack an

ancillary thing, just like with the Colonial pipeline. They didn't take the pipe down pipeline down itself. What they did was they took down the financial and accounting system so they couldn't track who they were selling it to. That type of thing, couldn't do accounting, So by taking down the accounting system, they stopped the flow and the biggest pipeline on the East Coast, the Colonial

pipeline. This is the way cybersecurity works. It would be nice if we had some protection against that, except that SISA is focused internally increasingly in the same way that the NSA and the CIA are increasingly focused internally, the same way that the FBI is not focused on criminals but on citizens. That's what our government has become. Finally, as we see started with a Babylon be Sorrylin with a Babylon be story in the news, the president of Harvard,

Claudine Gay, gives a tearful resignation speech entitled the Gettysburg Address. Supposedly fired for her plagiarism, she came back and accused them of being racist. She's being fired because she's black. Now she's being fired for racism, She's being fired for her perceived anti Semitism. The backers of Harvard, largely Jewish, did not like the line that she took about the Israel amas Or, and

so they pulled back as Donor is dead. And interestingly enough, they all discovered that she was a plagiariss and they had another round of plagiarism, and so as Babylon Besas. At publishing time, Harvard confirmed that they were already interviewing other communist black women to replace Gay, except that they didn't replace her with the communist black woman. They replaced her with a Jewish guy. We'll be right back. Whether you're feeling like the poos, where is or Bluegrass

APS Radio has you covered? Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at apsradio dot com. So, unlike most revolutions, whether people rise against the real economic oppression. In our case, here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle. It is, however, not nearly so abstract as a young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here is one of monopoly. Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our

country. Tomorrow it will be something else, liberty. It's your move. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, let's take a look at politics here. Let's take a look at the election. We have David Axelrod. If you remember who David Axelrod was, he was a White House had high level advisor to Obama. He was also high level official, maybe the campaign manager. I can't remember his exact title, but he worked on the

Obama campaign. He is a very savvy political operative and he's now saying the same thing that James Carvill, who was the savvy political operative of Bill Clinton. Both of them, both of them have been talking about how the the over the top legal moves that are being made against Trump. Everybody sees it.

Everybody knows it. You know, the Democrats know it, Republicans know it, and it's galvanizing the Republicans and both David Axelrod and James Carvill are saying this is you know, we're helping Trump, And of course everybody knows that. You don't think that. The district attorneys know that. You don't think the Department of Justice and the Biden administration knows that, knows why are they doing that? Why are they helping Trump? David Axelrod is panicking over

the Democrats tossing Trump off the ballot. He says, you're making him stronger. Here's what he had to say, all of this is strengthening him in the Republican primary. We've run this experiment. You know, he's only gained since he started getting indicted. You know, what you thought might be kryptonite for him has turned out to be battery packs, and this is a big one for him. Presumably the Supreme Court will deal with it fairly quickly,

and I expect that they will leave him on the ballot. And yes, brion I, I have very very strong reservations about all of this. I do think it would rip the country apart if he were actually prevented from running, because tens of millions of people want to vote for him. I think if you're going to beat Donald Trump. You're going to probably have to do it at the polls. Yeah, you should do it with debates, which they don't want to have. So are they going to make this about personalities?

And it's very much like what James Carvill said about the pending impeachment or hearings about Joe Biden and his corruption. James Carvill said, how do we get so lucky here? That's going to make us go Skyheim popular? You know, to paraphrase it. He knows exactly it's going to get the It's going to do the same thing for Biden. This is done for Trump. And you notice that both of these things are continuing to rip the nation apart,

polarizing it behind two men. There's no principles really involved here. Uh, this is the reality that we're looking at. Of course, you know the corruption that's happening with Biden, that is a principle that needs to be Uh, it needs to be looked at, but it should have been looked at for a long time. And Uh, again it's going to have the effect of polarizing. As he said, it ripped the country apart. But you know that's what they want. That's why I said, why are they

doing this. They all know Thisical advisors know it, everybody knows it. On both sides. I think that they want to have a civil war and Trump is going to be were They're going to do the Tiger War over and maybe over Biden as well. Stop and think about this. Look at how you have. The press is already saying, oh, well, we're gonna Republicans are take back the Senate. They're building up expectations for Republican voters. If that doesn't happen, We've already had the red wave that didn't happen.

Why did that not happen? Personally, I think it was because of Trump and his connection and Trump and his endorsements, you know, endorsing people like doctor Oz who is beaten even by Fetterman, endorsing other celebrity candidates who have absolutely no principles, empty suits, but they were loyal to him and they looked good. And so when you look at this as we're coming up to this, they really are sending this up to tear the country apart. And

I said this after the twenty twenty elections. I said, if you want to talk about election corruption, I've been talking about voting machines at that point in time. I've been talking about it since twenty fourteen, smart manic and it's our origin in Venezuela, created by friends of Hugo Chavez to make sure that he won that election. And they had a long history of accusations of

rigging elections throughout Mexico, Central America, Brazil, the Philippines. Over and over again, these accusations have been made, but it's not limited to one company. This is something that is going to make all elections vulnerable. And then Trump added the vote by mail to everybody, the mail out election where they mailed out ballots, in many cases multiple ballots mailed out to people. They're not talking about getting rid of that. Trump's not talking about getting rid

of it. He's saying, We're going to do a better job of it. I'm going to out cheat the other side with us vote by mail stuff. So everybody looks at this, and I said from the very beginning as well, I said, well, if you want to talk about corruption, talk about ballot access. That's where it all begins, is with ballid access. And now everybody's upset about the fact that Trump doesn't have ballid access, and they should be. But why is it only when it happens to Trump?

Why is canceling and censorship only an issue when it happens to Trump, as he ignored it in twenty eighteen, so he gets kicked off of Twitter. Nobody cares unless it is Trump, because we don't care about the principles and we don't care about other people. Look, you need to have an

open ballot if you're going to have democratic elections. And if you don't have open ballots, and if you don't allow all the candidates that are on the ballot, even after they jump through extra hoops that the Republicans and Democrats don't have to jump through, if you don't allow them to debate, you don't have a democracy, a mockery of a democracy. Take a look at RFK Jr. For example. I don't support RFK Junior, but just take a

look at the issues involved here. He is been cut out. Biden is not going to debate him, just like Trump is not going to debate his opponent. So he said I'm going to run as an independent. He's not going to get on the ballot in very many states. As a matter of fact, when he had James Carvell on over the Christmas breaks and he's talking to Bill Maher. James carvill is saying you better wake up, and he is a little bit stronger language about this. He said, look, we've

got all these people on the Democrat side who are running. You know, you've got Joe Manchin and a congressman who may be running as a no labels candidate, and you've got an even mentioned you know, some minor candidates. He didn't mention RFK Junior, who is a much bigger threat than Cornell West. And but you know, his problem is that he is not going to be on the ballot. And of course when you look at the Democrat Party of Florida, they even kept other Democrats off the ballot. The Democrat Party

did, They're only going to have Biden on the ballot. That's how you start rigging these elections. You rig them from the debates, from the ballot access to the debates. Then you rig them with polls. You push people say you elevate somebody like Trump, for example, it's not, Yeah,

he's won everything. We haven't even had the first primary yet, but he's won everything, according to all the polls and according to all the press that's out there, so you manipulate people with the polls, and then you manipulate them in terms of all the different things that can be done in terms of ballot custody, ballot reporting, and all the rest of this stuff. And

then you also have the vote by mail and the computer stuff. Be Getting back to David Axelrod, he said Trump wanted to set up a construct which says that they're coming after him because he's running for president and they're trying to prevent him from being president. He says, well, we've run this experiment. He's only gained popularity since he started getting indicted. What you thought might

be kryptonite for him turned out to be battery packs. And this is a big one for him, being kicked off of ballots and being kicked off just by you know, a secretary of state in one place, well or another place by judge. So as this is all happening, and there's the two

issues in Maine. In Colorado, vaiveik Ramaswami is doubling down, saying I'm going to withdraw my name from these ballots because he is angling at this point, you understand, for vice president, that's what he's really focused on and also angling for vice president is South Dakota Governor Christinoum, who says, I'm heading to Iowa. I'm going to do whatever i can to help Trump get across the finish line. Again. She's making an open move to be a

vice presidential candidate vice president along with Trump to get on the ticket. She says that she and Trump really work well together. Oh that nice. Yeah, she's not even trying to hide it. You know. That's again this whole thing, that House of Cards stuff, Game of Throne stuff. I just really hate this political maneuvering. You see a little bit with Fetterman. You know, Fetterman is starting to get to work again, talk again now, and he did an interview and he was saying, well, I was

very scared about this. You know, I thought I might lose my career. Your career. Politics is a career for you. How despicable, how anti American that these people think of themselves as careerists. And that's true of all the politicians, Republican and Democrat for the most part. You know, they don't have a life outside of this stuff. And this is the gravy

train that they're on. And they are social climbers. You know, the first time we had somebody that really fit that description in America is Abraham Lincoln. All the rest of the people said, well, you know, you'll stand for election. Other people will nominate me. These people push themselves self promoters, careerists. Truly is despicable. That's why we have the kind of

government that we have. So she said, on potentially serving as the twenty twenty four running mate, Christy Nomes says, we will talk about that when it's time to make a decision. Well, you know Trump has She works really well with Trump. They get along great, but he doesn't get along good with a lot of other people. As a matter of fact, is a Christmas message He told Biden and a lot of other people to rot in

hell. Merry Christmas. Is such a nice guy, isn't he. We should all be supporting him, don't you think all the Christians should be supporting him. As a matter of fact, you look at this headline, Trump rats worn. We're running out of time to stop his return to the White House. I guess that's me opposed him. That's why I got fired. I'm glad that I got fired. Actually, I'm proud of the fact that I stood up for people who were the lader were victimized as I predicted that

they would be victimized. But you know, I said yesterday, there's all these people are going to be It's going to be a difficult year for me because I'm going to double down on Trump. I'm going to double down on

this guy because I don't want to see him return to office. How in the world could anybody who has any conservative principles or any Christian support this guy after what you have seen him do in office, after he shut down the churches, after he put out the JAB and prepared all of that and paid for it all. As David Stockmann pointed out, you know, he spent trillions of dollars on these corrupt welfare programs, Stimulus check and the PPP and

all the rest of this. He's got a book coming out three weeks called Trump's War on Capitalism. That was one aspect of it, but it was much broader than that. It was a war on our individual liberties. It was a war on our very lives. The Trump shot the Trump poison. But like I said, it's going to be a difficult year for me. So I saw yesterday a comment that was by a listener, somebody who has

been a supporter in the past. It says, David, with a humble heart and love of Christ, for your sincerely hope the Lord touches you and sends his spirit of repentance, forgive Trump and gets set free from your root of bitterness. Well, first of all, Trump's not asking for forgiveness. He's proud of what he's done. Does that give you a clue? Do you have the discernment to understand this is a man who is proud of his crimes against humanity and that he will easily repeat them, of course in a

rhyming way, not exactly in the same way. But if he is capable of shutting down churches, why are you not pushing against him? Why are you telling me that I'm the problem? Frankly, I don't care if you listen. I don't care if you support this. I went against Alex over this January the sixth stuff and over this Trump shot stuff. He was my sole means of support, except I don't get my support from any person. God can provide for me. If you were to see somebody on a roof

sniping at people, would you call me bitter. If I warned people about it, what would you do? Are you going to call evil good? What do you think the Bible says about that? Christian? Can you discern good from evil? Can you discern a killer? Trump has killed far more people than any sniper has ever done, and he is capable of doing it again. He killed the constitution, he killed our economy, He paid and bribed governors to do all of this stuff. Don't excuse any of that stuff.

Don't remain silent. If you do, it's on you. I'm very comfortable with where I am, and I don't really care if anybody watches or supports this program. I answer to God, not to you, pal so called Christian. You don't have the discernment to understand what's going on with this guy. Let me give you an example of this. This is sent to me this morning by Mary ellen Moore, and it's an article that just came out another January, the sixth story. This is what I was trying to

warn people about. This is what Alex was setting up as a trap. I said, this is a grift. Stay away from it. It's a trap. You're being enticed into this, You're being lied into this. Alex is out there saying we're going to keep Biden out by any means necessary, and so when I warn people about that. Look, I'm not bitter because I got fired by Alex. It's been a real blessing. I'm very happy to be here and to not be in Texas. The climate suits me that

everything about this is much better. And I'm grateful to supporters, and I'm grateful to God for making this happen. But look, whatever happened, I didn't know any of that was going to happen. I didn't even know the

show was going to continue. I hadn't planned on the show continuing. But I'm not going to sit there and remain silent while he's telling people that the Trump shot is sugar juice, while he's supporting Trump, telling everybody that Trump is playing forty chess with the lockdowns and all the rest of the stuff, and while he's selling a fear campaign, and then at the end of the year ripping off people as he sends them into danger on January sixth. I'm

not bitter. I'm not bitter, but I'm not going to stop complaining about and warning people about Trump and about Alex because they are still influencing people. They're like a sniper who continues to take shots at people, and they're destroying people's lives. As Mary Elan Moore points out, Liz Colin is the one

who did this story, responsible for a film, The Fall of Minneapolis, about the George Floyd stuff that happened there. She lost her job with one of the networks there. She's married to Bob Kroll, who is or was the head of the police union. Because she talked about the corruption of the George Floyd name. But now she's talking about this particular family. Here's the headline from Liz Colin Minnesota mom slam's two tiered justice system. Ahead of the

family's j sixth trial. Her husband and her sons are facing jail sentences and here's what happened. All three of her sons and her husband are prefering for February the twelfth trial dates. The family makes up one third of the January sixth defendants from Minnesota. These are all her husband and three sons are all charged in face prison time. She said, I think this is something people really need to understand. People want to sweep it under the rug, but

it is still going on. To hear that it's still going on. People are still going to jail for Trump. People are still dying from Trump's sugar water, Alex. While these people point you to Ray Epps, they're the ones responsible for this stuff. Westbury said she and her family stayed for former Trump's former President Trump's entire speech from the Ellipse on January sixth, describing the massive crowds is unlike anything you'd ever seen, she said, So when we

get to the Capitol, there's no barriers. There was nothing set up that would have made us think that we could not be there. When we got there, my husband and my sons went ahead and my son Jonah was recording and just the whole day because it's very exciting. We'd never been to Washington, d C. So courted and put it on his snapchat. When we did go into the Capitol, the doors were open. Entrapment, entrapment. But never forget that, even though Biden is totally culpable for all this,

the entrapment as well as the enticement. The entrapment happened under Trump. The enticement came from Trump to save America. It came from Alex Jones, and there were no subsequent pardons either. Trump had a couple of weeks to pardon

people, he decided not to do it. Why not. As a matter of fact, Roger Stone, if you remember, was so angry with Trump that he went off on camera in front of some filmmakers that were doing a documentary film on Roger and I won't repeat in the language, but he swore up one side and down the other that he would oppose Trump for everything. And now look at what Roger is doing. One of his biggest fans out there, because that's the path to fame, fortune and followers, is to

get on the Trump bandwagon. So the doors were open. We were just like tourists, he says. She said it was actually one of his classmates, a high school classmate. They called the FBI and said, oh, I see somebody that was in the Capitol, a former classmate of mine. So that's how this all got started, she said. She said two of her sons helped her husband to a bench inside the Capitol after he was pepper sprayed. We see from some of the videos now that that was initiated by

the police. They initiated the force. She said, Isaac and Aaron went in to help Roslin Boilin, a Trump supporter who died that day. We didn't know who it was at first. Aaron said to my son Isaac, we've got to go help because they were doing CPR and we could see that. They went to the front of the tunnel, the infamous tunnel, and they tried to get to Roseanne to help, but they were unable to the police were spraying this very toxic yellow gas. From what I'm told, it

sucks the oxygen out of the air. So they realized they could not get to Roseanne. So Aaron told Isaac, let's pick up shields, and they were holding shields on the ground so that she wouldn't get sprayed. They're the ones who have felony charges for doing that, she said. Isaac and Aaron are facing up to twenty years in prison. Her husband Bob and son Jonah face up to two years in prison. Jonah Westbury was twenty five years old

in twenty twenty one. He is fighting a slew of charges, including entering and remaining in a restricted building and grounds, disorderly disruptive conduct and a restricted building in grounds, disorderly and disruptive conduct, and a capitol building in grounds and parading and demonstrating or picketing in a capitol building. Let me just say this. You know, when you look at what's going on with Info Wars, and you look at the martyrdom of supposedly martyrdom of Owen Schwarer, he

went to jail for sixty days, less than sixty days. It let him out early because he was demonstrating or picketing in a capitol building. He disrupted a hearing that was there. Now I understand that they gave him a suspended sentence and then they came after him again, and probably it was all because of the January six stuff. Think about how light he got off, and think about his role in enticing people into January sixth. He's not a victim.

He skirted this stuff, and Alex has skirted everything about this stuff. Isaac Westbury is eighteen years old disorderly conduct in a capitol building and an act of physical violence in the Capitol ground buildin because he was holding a shield. Aaron James is a US Navy veteran who served three tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. Faces the same charges as Isaac. He says, the reason that I went she said, I felt like I had to go. It was a

compulsion within me. Was it for President Trump? Well, I suppose it was because you had people like Alex saying, by any means, we're going to make sure that Joe Biden does not become president. So what happened to them before these indictments? Two no knock raids were carried out by the FBI. It first happened in April of twenty twenty one. I was talking earlier about Soros getting swatted. Well, this is an illegitimate swatting of these people

who committed no violent crime. They come in combat So again, Joe Biggs seventeen years no violence. Believe me. They went through and they highlighted him for the J six committee. You know there's Joe Biggs, but you know, darken everything out, but a highlight on him on the video. If he had done anything violent, you know, they would have highlighted that. She said they came in with a swat team. They came in combat style. They had AR fifteen's. Everybody has to get out, they said.

They dragged us, dragged the men to the front of the house. They put Jonah in shackles and leg irons and ankle irons. They dragged him out and put him in the back of a vehicle and brought him down for processing. He was in a holding cell for hours and hours and hours with leg irons on. He was inside of a cage with leg irons. You say, when we talk about and I mentioned nineteen eighty four Terry Gillian kind of black satire about nineteen eighty four that he called Brazil, and it begins with

this type of thing. Except even then, in nineteen eighty four, what Terry Gilliam put in Brazil was so over the top. I'll never forget seeing it for the first time. And yet we are beyond his exaggerated satire of a police state, the beginning of Brazil, movie about it to solitarian society. Can't hold a candle to this. They came in, she said, with fifty to sixty agents and a swat team, and they had drones that

went through my chicken coop and into the house. I don't know what they were looking for, but they dragged Aaron and Bob and Isaac down to be processed. They didn't allow them to even get shoes on. They didn't allow them to get really anything. They were in their stocking feet, barefoot. They brought them down to be processed, put them in leg irons. She said. The raids traumatized her neighbors, who would always refer to as the

Christmas Cookie Lady. They called me the Christmas Cookie Lady because I made Christmas cookies for everybody every year, and they were wondering what is going on at the Christmas Cookie Lady's house? She said, there was no reason for it. They took all of our firearms, all of my electronics. I haven't been charged as of yet, but everything in my house, the phones, the cell phones, the old cell phones, computers, everything, they took

everything. They had us get rid of all of our firearms, our crossbows, even had us get rid of replica guns, cap guns, cap guns. She said, my family did nothing wrong. If they take a deal, what are they pleading to Are they agreeing that they're guilty of? What of whatever the government says that they're guilty of. So they're standing up for

what's right, what's good, what's holy, what's true. After rioting in Minneapolis, the US Attorney's Office charged seventeen people with federal riot and arson, just four people who are responsible for destroying the Minneapolis Police Department's third Precinct building faced charges and the longest sentence of those has been four years. In that case, they comparing contrasts to what happened in Minnesota over the George Floyd.

Is that again, going back to the mother, we have people who are nonviolent at the capitol and they're being charged and they're being put in prison for twenty years, eighteen years. It is a tiered justice system. It's not justice, not justice at all. And it makes me think where has our country gone? And there's a fundraiser for this family to help them with their legal expenses. And so I want to go back to this and say,

forgive Trump, you forgive Trump. This is still going on. Every week we get more reports of people who have been sacrificed for his ego and his finances, and he's still doing it, and he's on the cusp of becoming president again. I will oppose that, And don't you push back on me on this stuff. Just go somewhere else, Go listen to Alex because I've been banned and canceled for speaking the truth so much that I don't have any

patience for you or anybody else. Narrowgate ministries, go somewhere else. If you can't handle the truth about Trump, because I'm going to let on. I don't care what the consequences are here. If you don't warn somebody when you see something happening, my conscience is clear. I tried to warn people away from January sixth. I said this kind of stuff was going to happen. Why don't you get angry about what is being done to innocent people?

Why do you push back on me against the person who did it to them, the criminals who did it to them, who enticed them, who entrapped them, who robbed them of their money. Why don't you talk about that. You want to pray for Trump, Pray for Trump. You know you're told to pray for Trump. You're told to pray for those in power. Pray that Trump becomes a Christian. Instead, Trump has surrounded himself with false prophets, false Christians, like the so called pastor and self anointed prophet Julie

Green. My children, the time has come a time that you have been waiting for a reinstatement, a shift of power, a new government in control and overthrow and a take over in this nation from the hands of the wicked to the hands of the righteous. There's not anybody righteous, especially her. The time is drawing near, a coup is about to be disrupted and annihilated, and everyone a part of it, exposed and removed. So my children,

hold on. Twenty twenty four will start out with a bang. So brace for a mighty impact coming to shake you loose from the chains that bind you. It will look worse, but remember my words. This means your enemy's days are running out. Yeah, so there they go. This is the woman who said, have so many false prophets who call themselves Christians. How many times do you have to lie to somebody about what's going to happen

before you become a false? It just once? And we've had these people who over and over again have said, no, Trump was the winner. Trump is going to be reinstalled, He's going to not leave office. Oh he's now, He's going to come back in March or in April or something like that. Continuing this, Julie Green has been that way from the very beginning and continues that way. She is held up by other false Christians like

Michael Flynn who goes to Christian buildings. They call him churches and holds his Reawakened tours and has people there, the sheep there reciting a prayer from Elizabeth Claire prophet, this cult leader from the nineteen eighties, plagiarizing it word for word. I've played that a couple of times, plagiarizing it word for word. And then he has Julie green On, and he has Eric Trump and Julie green On together, or Donald Trump Junior and Julie On together. Folks,

this is a false Christianity, it is. These are false prophets, their liars, their deceivers, their thieves, their criminals. Why would anybody not be bitter about this? Let me tell you what the appropriate way to do this is. Narrowgate narraw ministries. You ought to get the equivalent of some cords and beat these son of a guns out of the public square like

Jesus did. You ought to get angry about this kind of stuff. Infant son of a January the sixth defendant placed on the Quiet Sky's Suspected terrorist list. So yeah, you told me who is the rat and all of this stuff. There's no excuse for Biden. But Biden and Trump have been a tag team on both January sixth, and on the Vaccines their tag team. An eight week old infant has placed on a secretive terrorist watch list known as

Quiet Skies last week. According to AJ Fisher. The only suspected but not so reasonable explanation for this designation is that Fisher is a January the sixth defendant and the infant's father. Most alarmingly, it was not even Fisher who booked the ticket for his child. Fisher's finance fiance booked the ticket for herself and the infant, but neither was anywhere close to d C on January sixth. They booked separately weeks apart from Fisher because he is still waiting court approval for

travel due to his ongoing case with the Department of Justice. So now anytime Fisher's fiancee or their infant son travels, their boarding passes are stamped SSSS dedicate that they are suspected domestic terrorists. The infant son see Trump set them up. Trump set them up, and Alex set them up for this unbelievable. Nancy Mace, who is congresswoman from South Carolina, she went on to Fox News and said, we're losing the fight on abortion. Every single day.

No, they have not tried to fight abortion and failed. They have failed to even try to fight abortion. Nancy Mace says, Oh, I'm pro

life, but we're losing this fight. And if you want to be serious about reducing the number of abortions in this country, we have to have a conversation on how women can have greater access to birth control and abortions at other times right now, if you want to be serious about this, I have covered the the pro life progressive Democrat who is running for Congress simply because as a federal candidate, they cannot censor her pictures to show what abortion is.

In Washington, d C. She and other activists discovered a great number of aborted baby's bodies and they took pictures of them, and she is using her candidacy for Congress to show those pictures because the networks cannot refuse to show that that is the truth of abortion that Nancy Mace and these other Republicans don't want to go near, don't want to go near it. And you know, as somebody who is running for Congress, Nancy Mace is uniquely positioned to be

able to show the truth. If I were to, if I had the money to buy those they wouldn't run those ads only if you're running for Congress. And that's why this progressive leftist who is pro life is running these these commercials. But no so called pro life Republicans will do that, never have done that. This is not an opposition to abortion. They have never opposed it because they have never shown it for the crime that it truly is.

We're gonna take a quick break and we come back. We'll talk about Nikki Haley and Joe Biden. So we'll be right back. Stay with us analyzing the globalists next move and now the deevid nutshell. Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APS radio dot com. Well, Nicki Haley, and this is a good article. I appreciate this. This is from US natural Born Citizen dot com. And they're under her game. And she's

not unique. We've had so many presidential candidates again, so why would we be surprised that people running for presidency don't care about the constitution. That was one of Trump's defenses in this Colorado case. Well, you know, he didn't swear note to the Constitution, and he didn't. You know, the office of the president is not a you know, not anything that's on the Constitution or whatever. It's like, Well, actually he's telling the truth.

You know. The Constitution is a dead letter to these people. Time to wake up. That's what his lawyers say, just like Alex's lawyers said, he's an actor. He's an entertainer. That's right. And Trump is not subject to the Constitution. That's right. His lawyers told you the truth. Trump won't tell you the truth that they will not subject to the Constitution either, because she is not born on American soil, to American president, to

American citizens. As per the Immigration Nationality Act of nineteen fifty two, It clearly states one has to be a resident on file for a five year waiting period before obtaining a naturalization status. She was born before that period of time was completed with her parents, who moved to America from India. Therefore, she was born to parents who were not citizens at the time. Prior to

the Fourteenth Amendment. This was the rule of law the Supreme Court in English versus Trustees of eighteen thirty and in Elk versus Wilkins of eighteen eighty four ruled that a child born on US soil of a father who owes allegiance to sovereignty other than the United States is not a US citizen at birth, and that the citizen should of such a child is that of its father and not of its place of birth. Nikki Haley would have been classified as a foreigner under

these court decisions of eighteen thirty and eighteen eighty five. And then when you look at the fourteenth Amendment, I believe came between those two came back after the Civil War. I don't have the date of the fourteenth Amendment here, but I believe it came between those two Supreme Court decisions. And what did it say, Well, it made it very clear that you have to be subject to the jurisdiction and citizens of the United States in order to be made

a citizen. Why did that come up in the fourteenth Amendment Because the Fourteenth Amendment. The purpose of the fourteenth Amendment was to say that freed slaves had full rights of citizenship. They had been born in the United States to parents who were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and so that's why it uses that phrase there. But they made a distinction about someone who was a let's say, an ambassador who is here legally, not even an illegal

alien, but an ambassador who is here legally. And if they have children, those children are not American citizens. They have just you know, that is not what the majority opinion is right now, but that is what the

law states. And so when we look at this, it's not just NICKI Haley, it's also Marco Rubiot ted Cruz Obama if he was if his father was really Obama, but if his father was that that communist organizer, you know, was it dreams for my real father, Joel Gilbert had if his father was really the communist organizer, then he would be a natural he would

an American citizen. But again looking at some housekeeping issues here. Another listener was questioned about it was upset about the fact that in California there was a statement. She sent me a statement. I would say, what are they doing to Republicans here? Well, it wasn't a Republican party that was trying to keep people off the ballot. In California, they had the three America three parties, the American Independent Party, the Democrat Party, and the Libertarian

Party allow people who have no party preference to vote in their primaries. But that's a decision that's made by the parties because the parties have so much control over all of this. But the Green Party, the Peace and Freedom Party, and the Republican presidential primaries are only open to voters who are registered with

that party. And so again, you know, when we look at this, we need to understand what the games are being played with the ballot and how much power the parties have in terms of connecting that crossover voting is whether trying other Republicans don't want Democrats voting in their primary, so they don't allow that. But of course you could say the crossover voting is happening with the district attorneys and the Department of Justice that are making heroes out of Trump.

And then Biden. What is Biden doing? Well, again, he has Joe Biden picked up these dogs. And we see this happen all the time from presidential candidates. They never had a dog, but then they they get elected president and they get a dog because it somehow humanizes them, I guess for them to have a dog. And so he adopted you know, let's go let's be really politically correct. Instead of getting a puppy or something, I'll get a dog that has been abandoned by the people because they've got biting

issues or something like that. And rather than having somebody train it, he just lets it run loose because it's all just about a photo op. And now his second dog is also accused of biting many people. I guess when he goes to the vet. Here, you go to the vet and they give you the they put your last name there behind the dog, and so you know, we take a scout to the vet, he's Scout Knight.

Well this is Commander. That's the name they gave this dog. And I guess when he goes to the vet, he is Commander biting because he's biting everybody. And that's an appropriate identification for both the dog and his owner. But then you know, when you look at Joe Biden, he's been on vacation quite a bit, so maybe he doesn't accompany the dog to the vet. You think, I'm sure he doesn't. Thirty percent of twenty twenty three was Joe Biden on vacation. He says that he's working as he's sitting there

under the umbrella, but I don't think so. And then twenty twenty three, he says his favorite memory of twenty twenty three is the economy's improvement. This is a guy who can't remember what his favorite food is. Remember he and I just recently had his wife remind him that he likes ice cream, and so Biden says on New Year's Eve that his favorite memory of twenty twenty three was the improvement of the US economy. I don't think we can trust

his memory. This guy is truly our first AI president. Isn't he the artificial incumbent? Yeah, that's exactly what this guy is. We'll be right, but looking for better information. Apsradionews dot com features articles and commentary, along with audio from all the top news from around the world. Apsradionews dot com Making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show, and the only thing that got me out of that space was a comedian friend of

mine, the late great Norm McDonald. That's right, shout out the Norm. And what Norm did, which I'll never forget, is he knew that I was the biggest Jim Carrey fan in the world. Now, I'm not going to go all into it. But Jim Carrey is talented in a way that you can't practice rehearse. What a god given talent. I was fascinated with him, and Norm knew that, and he called me up and he goes Dave. He said, I'm doing a movie with Jim Carrey. Do

you want to meet him. It was the first time I could remember since my father died being excited. In the movie was called Man on the Moon. I didn't know any of this. And in this movie Jim Carrey was playing another comedian and I admired the late great Andy Kaufman. Yes, and Jim Carrey was so immersed in that role that from the moment he woke up to the time he went to bed at night, he would live his life.

It's Andy Kaufman. I didn't know that. When they said cut, this was still Andy Kaufman, so much so that everybody on the crew called him Andy. I didn't know any of that. I just went there to meet him, and when he walked into the room he was supposed to meet, I screamed Jim Carrey, and everyone said, no, call him Candy, and I had to understand. And then he came up when he was acting weird. I didn't know he was acting like Andy Kaufman, just like, Hey, how you doing it? And I was like, hello,

Andy. Now, in hindsight, how un lucky are mine? And I got to see one of the greatest artists of my time immersed in one of his most challenging processes ever. Very lucky to have seen that. But as it was happening, I was very disappointed because I wanted to meet Jim Carrey and I had to pretend it was Andy Kaufman all afternoon, and he was clearly Jim Carrey. I can look at him and I could see he was Jim Carrey. Anyway, I say all that to say, that's how trans

people make me feel. And yeah, that's a sorry about some of the profanity. I forgot to beep out of that, but that's It's quite a punch line that he had there, and very true. As a matter of fact, This Zero Hedge article says activists are now furious at Dave Chappelle because he explains transgenderism. You're not any Kaufman. You're not a woman either.

All it takes is one person to point out reality and break the collectively enabled delusion and that's what I think he did a great job of doing, they say on this article is a zero Hedge article. The trans movement exists in this kind of bubble, a place where objective truth is no longer welcome, and cognitive dissonance is encouraged for the sake of comfort. Much like any oppressive environment, the more people self censor to avoid rocking the boat, the harder

it is for individuals to speak their minds. This is how concent is manufactured, by creating the illusion of consensus. And so, you know, we certain things you're not allowed to say. Certain people will, you know, punish you for that. You don't want to oppose the agenda of the pharmaceutical companies, of the military industrial complex, or the World Economic Forum. You don't want to oppose the agenda of the LGBT, or they will punish you

for that. You don't want to in Republican circles say anything about Trump. Chappelle is back with another Netflix special. It's called The Dreamer, And as one person says, hey, you know, lighten up. This is a comedy. Everybody gets mocked and that's why it's funny. No one is too special to be made fun of. Well, that's what real comedy is about, right. Ricky Jervis, who also released a special of the Christmas period, was attacked again for not towing the woke line. The only thing more

popular on Netflix right now than Dave Chappelle. And he posted this and he said, hey, we should get together and host the Oscars together. I think that's going to happen anytime soon. But take a look at what is happening even in churches. The Methodist Church in the UK says that we should have more inclusive language, which means that the Methodist Church is saying we've got to get rid of husband, wife, brother, sister, because those are

hurtful things. Hurtful things. Replace them by what you might ask, Well, you replace that with a parent or partner, or child or career, but not mother and father. And of course, you know, we've had liberal elements within the Catholic Church that we've got to get rid of our fathers to sexists and all the rest of this stuff. And so what about you know, we want to honor these people, They say, using a person's chosen pronouns is helpful as it honors their identity. Well, what about honoring

God? What about honoring the reality of his creation and how he created us. No, that's not anything we want to do. In California, you've got schools or forcing kids to watch movies about transgenderism, and they use these things as commercials for puberty blockers. California school district that has more than nineteen thousand students, Get your kids out of schools because this isn't something that just happens in California. It's everywhere. It's everywhere. So they've got a lesson

planned. It centers around a twelve year old girl. They give this to fifth graders who are at that age, right eleven to twelve. So a twelve year old girl unsure of her gender identity, the film promotes the use of puberty blockers to give her more time to decide. This school district has also pledged forty million. They pledged in twenty twenty one forty million dollars to

develop and implement an ethnic studies curriculum. They spent over ninety thousand dollars on a quote liberated ethnic Studies curriculum un quote, which was coming from an organization that pushes critical race theory. They also spend fifty seven thousand dollars at an organization called Woke Kindergarten. They're teaching critical race theory in kindergarten that is aimed to quote disrupt whiteness. They're teaching hardcore racism to kids in kindergarten. What

do you think our society is going to be like? They're going to get their race war. They're working real hard on it, and they're using our money, and they're using your children if you're putting them in school. Another twenty three thousand dollars with the questsol Education Services, an organization that teaches anti racist math. Well, math doesn't have race in it unless you put it in now, math is completely free of race. We look at what is

happening in Ohio. Governor Dwined there a Republican, and again over the holidays he vetoed a bill that was set up to protect kids from being mutilated chemically, surgically and so. Jack Windsor is a journalist out of Ohio and in this interview where they talked to him about this, this is he was interviewed by a Tennessee Star. He talks about the deep ties between the wine and the medical industrial complex and by that he means both the hospitals as well as

big pharma. He works for the Ohio Press Network as a journalist, and he said, you know, this goes back the guy who was interviewing him at the Tennessee Star said, you know, you were probably the most disliked journalists there during the lockdowns and stuff like that that this Republican governor was doing the wine. He said, yeah, I guess if they would handed out of those kinds of awards for the press, I would win that award hands

down. The guy said, you had ask him questions that he couldn't answer about the COVID lockdowns and all the phony elements of the COVID report that they had in Ohio. He says, yeah, we were just talking about the data. Right, If the mass don't work, why aren't they working? He said, That's just what we were talking about. We were talking about any conspiracies or anything like that. We're just asking, you know, what's the matter with the mask and why isn't that stuff working? He says,

Are we looking at the long term impact of these COVID policies? You know, these are the kind of questions, frankly, that need to be asked of Vivek Ramaswamy, because as we look at Governor Dwine and we look at what he did during not just you know what he's doing now by vetoing this legislation to protect children from so called doctors that want to mutilate them, we go back and look at you know is it is a continuum going back to

the so called pandemic and it was Vivic Ramaswamy who was on the Wine's team. That's damning enough to oppose Ramaswami right there. So anyway, he said at one point he was out of answers because there's no correlation between what he was doing and what was really going on with a virus. So instead of saying, you know what, we may have gotten this wrong, they just kicked people out who ask those hard questions. So we see that everywhere.

Have you heard Trump say that he got the vaccine wrong? No, No, he doubles down on it. You know, he push him on it, and he pushes back and tells you that he saved two hundred million people or something, some nonsense that he just makes up. They will not admit even to doing wrong, which tells you that they're not going to stop doing wrong. He says, it would have this bill that was vetoed by Dwine would have outlawed puberty blockers, cross sex hormones, and what we call gender

mutilation surgeries. It would have made it illegal for males to compete in girls' sports and also invade their privacy in places like locker rooms. He said, many people on the Republican side of the aisle, and I would even dare say. One of Dwine's former advisors contacted me a day before Dwine vetoed the bill and said, what's going on? This is a layup? He said, why is this taking him so long to make a decision about this?

Well, we'd been investigating, and I unpacked some of the information that we had gathered and I said, look, he's going to veto this, and here's why I think he's going to do it. Do you remember Christinom. Christinom who is traveling to Iowa because she's a great fit for Trump, and she really is, you know, have neither of them have any principles?

Right? Trump is saying any protection against abortion is too harsh, and on and on, pushed gun control by executive orders at that president, all these other things Christinome. When a bill was presented to her, she vetoed it as well. That bill was about sports men and women's sports, and she vetoed that. So she's a good fit for him. So and he says. Jack Windsor, the journalist from Ohio, says, his former advisor said, in her opinion, said, look, he's just old the wine.

He's out of touch. He really just doesn't understand this is an issue. He thinks this is really not an issue. And Jack Winsor said, no, I don't buy that. He came out. He said that his reasoning was that he'd had parents who told him that if it wasn't for these treatments, their child would be dead. Yeah. Right, He says. He's

owned by the big drug companies and they're driving this kind of activism. He's beholden to the medical industrial complex, just as he was during the lockdowns, just as he was during the Here you take the jab and I'll enter you in a lottery to possibly win a million dollars. Where did de wine get that money? Well, Trump pages helicoptered in tons billions of dollars, tens of billions of dollars to all these governors, to do exactly that type of

thing. But Dwine took the lead on that. That's another thing that Ramaswamy needs to answer for. He was on his team. What did you say about that? What did he have to do with that? So anyway, Daily Caller did some research and found that DeWine received forty thousand dollars from children's hospitals who support sex change procedures. Now, why don't the Republicans impeach him? As I said before, you know, we should impeach Biden for crimes

of corruption like that. But you know, in this environment and in this time, it's going to be perceived it's just tit for tat. It'll be dismissed by the Democrats. They don't care about the corruption. I mean, they don't care about the corruption from New Jersey Senator Menindez. He's been up

multiple times about corruption and now you know they're coming after him again. Lindsey Graham, by the way, testified as a character witness for Menendez and his pre vious corruption trial, because you know, you always want to have Lindsay Graham as a character witness. No, they're on the same team when it comes to the military industrial complex. Well, you know the Wine is on the same team as the medical industrial complex and their medical martial law. So

he's paid off by them. Gave him forty thousand dollars. Look, it doesn't matter whether they gave him forty million dollars or forty thousand dollars or forty dollars. He's on their payroll. He took a bribe. It's just that simple. Of course, the Democrats are not going to indict him for that because they're all about the trans agenda, and the Republicans won't do it because he's part of their party. He says. This is a five billion dollar

industry nationwide. He says, I've talked with representatives of the Senate President. They seem to think they've got the votes to override the wines of Vetail. They seem to be one hundred percent willing enabled to consider this and to provide enough votes for a veto override. So he said, the final nail in the coffin for me to know that Dwine was going to veto this bill was the night before Lieutenant Governor of Ohio John Houston or Husted, I don't know

how I pronounce his name, said on Twitter. He said not verbatim, but essentially he said, Hey, I believe this should be law. I hope that goes into law. He said, so you could see him unhitching his wagon from de Wine. This lieutenant governor in Ohio has got a problem. He didn't unhitch, says journalist Jack Windsor. He didn't unhitch his wagon

from DeWine during COVID. Neither did Ramaswami. Dwine was really lucky and so was the Lieutenant governor that the primary was far enough after the midst of how they handled COVID that he didn't lose. If they would have had the primary in the middle of that c is the Wine would have lost. But then there's this who was it that gave him the money for what he did with

COVID that both the Wine and the Lieutenant governor doubled down on. Well, it was Trump who is now saying now distancing himself from the guy that he gave the money to to be a COVID dictator. Trump says, I'm finished with this stiff, meaning the Wine, that Trump is hypocrite in chief. Trump is somebody who not only funded DeWine's medical martial law on the million dollar

lotteries to take the jab and all the rest of this stuff. But he is also a pioneer in all this transgender stuff, pushing men to get into women's beauty contests. When he had Miss Universe, he was open to it, he was bragging about it, he was supporting it. But see, this is all for Trump. This is just a popularity contest, he says. You know, whenever I do an event with the Wine, he gets loudly booed every time I introduce him at the rally. So I'm done with

this stuff because this is nothing other than Trump's own perceived self interest. That's what it's always about. So he's the person who pushed the transgenders into beauty contests and one and all that stuff. But you know, this bill is vetoed by to Wine. Now Trump has done with this guy because it prohibits biological males from competing in women's sports. Doesn' say anything about beauty contests though, and again, the person who wound up owning Miss Universe today had a

whole bunch of men in that beauty contest. And it's not just the beauty contests and the sports other sports. USA boxing is now going to allow transgenders to fight women beginning this year. Trump should be proud. He should be proud. This is what he was talking about a long time ago. World Boxing Council President Mauricio sulimaner I guess is way he pronounce his name call the Telegraph that he's not happy with the ruling that his organization has sought to create

a unique division strictly for transgender athletes. This is a different This is the World Boxing Council, whereas the US Boxing organization that's the name of US Boxing, they're going to allow it. But the World Boxing Council guy said in boxing, a man fighting a woman must never be accepted, regardless of gender change. There should be no gray area around this, and we want to go into it with transparency and correct decisions. Woman to man or man to

woman. Transgender change will never be allowed to fight a different gender by birth. You don't change your gender and change your mind what you think you are, but there is no changing your gender. So you know, maybe we could still have professional wrestling opened up to women. I don't know. That's where Donald Trump hangs out, because he really is the master of professional wrestling. Whether we're talking about the actual theatrical stuff or the professional wrestling of politics

will be right back. Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass. APS Radio has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APS radio dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, we were talking about the Methodist Church in the UK. Maybe it's in the US as well, where they were changing the terms that they're going to refer to people. Don't call them husband and wife, don't call them mother

and father. These are offensive things. We should run away from them. Calvin Robinson had a substack talking about this, the Methodist Church branding husband and wife as offensive. You know, it was years ago James Dobson, who

did had Focus on the Family said about the Methodist Church. He said, you know when I was when they started embracing all this LGBT stuff, He said, when I was going up, he said, the difference between the Baptists and the Methodists was that the Baptist didn't think that you could lose your salvation and the Methodist did. But now he said, you know, it's they've completely gone off track. You know the reality is the Methodists have lost

the plot altogether, not just understanding what it takes to be saved. They've lost the entire plot because they've lost the Bible. They no longer care. What they do is they bring the zeitgeist of society into their church. So as the Calvin Robinson said, he said, you know you ban these terms because they said it conveys an assumption that is not the reality for many people. Well, it determines reality. What is the objective truth? Especially for

somebody who claims to be a Christian? He said, living in grace is not a reality for many people, So should we avoid using the word grace? He says, difficult to get one's head around the idea that ministers should stop using particular words in case a minority of people find them be offensive. The question has to be asked, so what so what if they find it offensive? Does not know that these people not know that the Gospel, which is good news, is an offense to most people. There are many people

who find the Bible offenses. So should we throw it out altogether? Of course not. But so is the idea of no longer using regular English terms like husband and wife, which have clear and unoffensive meanings. There's nothing inclusive about excluding the traditional use of the English language, or for that matter, reject being the institutions that were created by God, the family first institution.

Where is all this coming from, he says, Well, the manipulation of our language is coming not from Christianity, but from Marxism, critical race theory and critical theories. Our contemporary take on Marxism, the neo Marxism is an amended, extended, and adapted form of Marxism for the twenty first century. He says, Marxism forces the overwriting or the replacing of what is appropriate or acceptable. They do this with everything. It's just like tearing down statues,

historical statues. Everything must be erased and altered, he says. Liberals would say that disordered lifestyles are equal to ordered lifestyles, but Marxists would go a step further. They say that disorder must replace order, because that's how they

come to power. Let me justthethically put in here. You know, as we look at the press and how they focus on whenever they can find somebody who is, you know, identifies as a Christian or as a pastor, or as a priest or whatever, and they're involved in some kind of a sexual crime or violence or angersome. And here's an example of this. You got a pastor in North Carolina. His wife was working at McDonald's and she

called him up. She said she was being disrespected by the cook. And so this guy goes to McDonald's. He grabs a guy by the throat and he tries to push him into the deep friar. And the only reason I'm covering this and the police came and arrested him. They got the camera footage, surveillance footage showing exactly what happened. The only reason I'm covering it is because of this this great headline from Zero Hetch talking about it. They call

it baptism by friar. I thought that was hilarious. But anyway, it is a shame that, you know, we have whenever something like that happens, they will hold us to those standards. They won't hold themselves to those standards. When we look at what happened in Iowa with the Satanic display there,

John Harris says the Founding Fathers are now meeting the pluralist Satanists. In December of twenty twenty three, fault lines emerged within the ranks of both conservatives and evangelicals after a Navy pilot destroyed a Baphomet statue depicting Satan in the Iowa state Capitol. Now, I've talked about this and I've said, you know, the bottom line is is that these Satanists are not exercising religious liberty because they don't have a religion. What they're doing is they're anti free speech,

they're anti free exercise of religion. They're anti God, they're anti Christ. They don't believe any of this stuff, and they want to urge all of it. It is kind of a Marxist issue here, very much like that, trying to purge things. They don't have a religion that they believe. They are anti religion, Antichrist, all the rest of this stuff. But I also said, you know, I agree with this guy essentially knocking it

down. I'm fine with that. But what is interesting is the fact that you've got people like John Dunwell, who's a Christian Missionary Alliance pastor and a representative in the state of Iowa elected representative, one of the first to publicly use the logic of religious neutrality to support the statue's presence. I don't think they were called to be silent. I don't think we're called to be neutral. He said he didn't want the state evaluating and making determinations about religions.

Well, neither do I. But this is not a religion, and nobody is questioning the Satanist's religion. Nobody's asking, well, what do you really believe? You know, you really believe that they are openly saying they don't believe any of this stuff. They're openly saying that they're doing this in order to shut down any free exercise of religion. That's what they're doing. So it's not like you're setting up some kind of an inquisition as they did to

soldiers in the military. Do you really have a religious objection to this vaccine? Well, explain this to me, and then trying to trick them and trap them up seat you're taking this other stuff over here, and they used a test for No, it's not any of that kind of stuff. These people are openly telling you they don't believe what they say their religion is, and they're openly telling you that they're against you having free speech, you having

free exercise. And then you had a Presbyterian pastor Scott Clark, who said Christians should not engage in iconoclasm, in other words, tearing down icons any reason that since the Iowa State Capital is a secular building, their religious displays of any kind should be present there, including Nativity scenes. He doesn't understand at all. He doesn't. This is a guy who is a pastor.

He doesn't understand either Christianity and he doesn't understand the principles of establishment versus exercises. As I've always said, So there is no neutral position. Right when you come to preferred pronouns, and you come to drag queens, and you come to mutilation by chemicals and surgery, is there a neutral position in that? No, there isn't. So the Satanic Temple essentially exploits America's tradition of

religious toleration in order to destroy that religious toleration. So why do we play that game with them? So that's my first take on it. Jenna Ellis, who represented Trump and then tearfully repented of all that. Jenna Ellis is now weighed in on this. She says, we don't I want to create a theocracy that doesn't allow religious freedom. But they point out in this substanc

in seventeen eighty seven, when the federal Constitution was ratified. Nine state constitutions included Christian religious test requirements for officeholders, including adherence to doctrines such as the Trinity and the inspiration of Scripture. The four remaining states were governed by explicitly

Christian royal charters or constitutions. New York, one of the states that did not have a religious test, said in their constitution of seventeen seventy seven that quote, free exercise of worship and liberty of conscience shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness. Not only did all thirteen states recognize God, but they exclusively preferred Christianity in seventeen eighty six of Virginia Statute for Religious

Freedom that Jefferson was so proud of. That's what he wanted on his tombstone, not the Decoration of Independence, but the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom. That statute's immediate impact was to foster a greater peace between competing Christian denominations by

ending compelled worship. And see, that's what establishment is, and that's the difference between the establishment of religion and the free exercise of religion, and that is government compulsion, they would compel people to go to a particular church, or compel people to pay for a church. None of that is involved. And that was always the case. As a matter of fact, into the

eighteen forty something you had Massachusetts still had a state church. Of course, that's long after the Constitution was ratified and eighty seven, and after the Bill of Rights in seventeen eighty nine, they still had an established state church. I don't agree with that, But the First Amendment doesn't even prohibit a state established church. First Amendment prohibits the Congress from a stateablishing that because all the

states had established those. But again, the issue here is compelling people versus allowing them to freely exercise in the public square what they believe. And that is what came in the middle of the twentieth century with a Supreme Court, and that is what the Satanists are busy trying to do. But as we see in school district, after school district, and here's another article about their after school satan club and a Kansas school, let me just say this isn't

the school itself a club, a Satanist club. What they teach the kid, they give them pornography, they teach them they're the wrong body, They teach them to hate people because of the color of their skin. Isn't that a school of Satan? And isn't the Iowa State Capitol Building largely a monument

to Satan when we look at the policies. But the bottom line is that God can use even this, as I've pointed out before, when they put the Satan clubs in, what it does, is it They're putting these after school Satan clubs in because they want to get rid of the after school Bible clubs. And yet when they go in and they do this, people look at it and then they say, this is this is pretty crazy. They find out about the after school Bible programs that they didn't know about before.

You say, God can use any of this stuff to further what he wants to do. You know, as we began by saying that the United Methodist Church wants to get rid of even the term husband and wife and mother and father. You have a movement, and a lot of it I think is just kind of a style type of thing, you know, TikTok type of thing, the trad wife movement. But there was an article on the Epic Times about a twenty two year old who quits her job and becomes a traditional

wife. At first, she's talking about how she just loves the nineteen forties on it, so this is very much of a style thing. But it is a bit deeper than that because as she gets into it and talks about how, you know, they met through mutual friends and everything, and she said, I'm doing this because my purpose is and glorify God, and I don't see that very much in modern society. Well, I don't see it at all either, And that really is the issue. You know, we

look at this how we're going to live our lives. What is the purpose of our lives? Is the purpose of our life to honor God. It's a purpose of my life to try to get as big an audiences. No, I don't care. I've got an audience of one. I've got an audience of one, and that's what I do this for. And because it bothers me again to see people sniping and killing and tricking and imprisoning people. I don't like that kind of corruption. We'll be right back in a world

of deceit. Telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show looking for better information. Apsradionews dot com features articles and commentary along with audio from all the top news from around the world. Apsradionews dot com. Let's talk about money before our guest comes on from the Last American vagamond. We're going to talk about fluoride. But US national it has now topped thirty four trillion in the first time in history. It's just grown by

leaps and bounds since twenty twenty when Trump began the PPP stuff. But think about that thirty four trillion dollars. That's more than one hundred thousand dollars per man, woman and child in the United States. I guess maybe we need to bring in more illegal aliens to help pay this off. Well, no, the problem is that two thirds of the illegal aliens who come in are on welfare. That's why I've said it's the magnet that nobody wants to do

anything about, right, It's the magnet of welfare. We got in California, Gavin Newsom first state to offer full insurance to illegal aliens. And so again it's all Cloud and Piven. That's you know, opening up the floodgates. So we can bankrupt this state. But you know they can do it even without the illegal aliens with all of their trillions of dollars of handouts that they're warned at the very beginning were going to be gamed and it was going

to be corrupt, that there was no controls on that. I've talked about that in the past. Just four decades ago, the national debt hovered around nine hundred and seven billion, zero point nine zero point nine trillion. Now it's thirty four trillion, growing by you know, six or seven trillion a year under Trump and Biden. And so that was happening forty years ago. I remember the left raging at Ronald Reagan look at this exploding deficit. But

it's the same kind of stuff that you see Speaker Johnson doing. Now. You know, it was always you vote for mine and I'll vote for years, and so you got Johnson who's saying, well, let's let's spend some money on the US border protecting it, and I'll open up the floodgates for you to send money to Ukraine. It's that type of thing, that type of thing that exploded the deficit forty years ago. But again it's now thirty

four times bigger. Even more worrisome is that the spike in interest rates of the past year and a half has made the cost of servicing the debt more expensive because, of course, as interest rates rise and the deficit is exploding, and the interest rates have gone up further and faster than we've ever seen in the past, not at a higher rate now than they got in the

nineteen eighties, but going up at a faster rate. Interest payments in the national debt are projected to be the fastest growing part of the federal budget over the next three decades. For example, payments are expected to triple from nearly four hundred and seventy five billion dollars in fiscal year twenty twenty two to a stunning one point four trillion dollars by twenty thirty two, one and a half trillion dollars just on interest. Who gets that federal reserve? Why why are

we paying them this? And of course they're going to be passing that on to people who bought their Federal Reserve bonds and other things like that. The whole system, the interest payments are projected to surge to five point four trillion by twenty fifty three. By twenty fifty three, five point four trillion dollars just on interest on the debt, and that depends on what they're going to

do with the interest rates could be worse. That's more than the US spends on Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and all other mandatory and discretionary spending programs. Let me just say this, under the constitution, there's not really any there's no mandates in the constitution for them to spend a cent. They have some responsibility for defense, which they won't do. They won't even defend

our borders. But all the rest of these programs that are entitlement programs that they say they have no discretion whatsoever about, those are unconstitutional, all of them. So what do you do about this? How do you get out of this system? Well, again, gold gets you out of that system. It really does. And so that's one of the key reasons to to try to get out of gold. And a lot of people are starting to realize this. First it was Costco, Now it's Walmart. You know.

Costco said we sold one hundred million dollars and gold, and now Walmart is selling gold and silver. As one person on Twitter, Crypto Rich said, are you awake yet? This is a financial change, a spike today in the price of gold, and it's attracting every last buyer, including Walmart and Costco buyers. You know, they're all under the fear of missing out.

You know, gold is taken off and we got a as Tony Arduben the Wise wolf Gold always says, you know, when you look at when the price of gold spikes up, everybody wants to rush in and buy it. You should rush in and buy it when it drops even or just buy it all. You know gradually over a period of time. Is he set up

wolf Pack to do that? Because what you want to do is you want to get out of this system, this bankrupt system, and you want to get out of the web, the net that they are designing for everybody with CBDC. So yeah, fear of missing out, but it's always a good time to get out of this fake system. And understand that the spikes again, as Tony's always pointed out, the spikes are just variations in this fiat currency. You know, you look at what gold buys in terms of and

there's been a lot of people have done various things. I remember the one that we talked about a suit. You know, one hundred years ago, somebody buys a suit and they travel to Europe and they were able to do all that with gold. And how much gold did it take for a custom suit? And how much does that cost today in terms of fiat currency?

And you know it stays the goal stays about the same, but the fiat currency way more, way more costco and Walmart's gold rush comes as goal prices have swored fourteen percent since early October to a record new high of two thousand and eighty eight this week. Gold's strength has been underpinned by traders aggressive pricing

of Federal Reserve rate cuts. As one person says, who's the portfolio manager of Tiberius Group, He says, gold is the answer from many things at the moment, whether it's inflation or whether it's carrying on, or whether it's rate cuts with uncertainty or very costly wars. But it doesn't even mention what I think is the biggest reason that is CBDC Free Thought Project does the cbdc's

roll out. You've got different groups of crypto companies that are very connected to the globalist elite, and they're all competing with each other and making alliances with each other, some of them making alliances with Bill Gates and some of them making alliances with the World Economic Forum. But they're all trying to position their product to be the blockchain infrastructure for CBDC. That's what they're all trying to

do. And so he starts off by talking about interests. Elba, the actor who has done an elaborate promotional video for an organization called Stellar, saying that this is going to help marginalize people. Who've you heard this argument before. We've heard it from Bill Gates when he's pushing the ID number for everybody in India the ODDHAR system. Well, everybody needs to have an ID. These people are marginalized. They're out of the system, and we've got to

get them in the system. Now. They want many of them would like to have more money, but they want to be out of the system. They are like, oh, how can I get an ID? Right? And so they sell this as saying, well, this is going to open up borderless opportunities. Well, borderless because it's going to be a global CBDC. That's what they're really pushing for. Unlimited Hangout went through and looked at the relationships between these people. And it's kind of interesting because there's three of

them. There's this one from Stellar, and then there's also Ethereum, and then there's also Ripple that are all positioning themselves and they look at the relationship with these men. They're all tied one way or the other to the World Economic Form or to Bill Gates. You know. They have these different you know, power coalitions that are forming to try to set up some kind of a global currency. What I thought was interesting was that they were all founded

about the same time. Ripple came in and twenty twelve they called it open Coin. Then in twenty fourteen, Stellar was a spinoff of Ripple that was in twenty and fourteen, and then in twenty fourteen you also had Ethereum created by the Italic bouterin if I'm pronouncing his name correctly anyway. So you have these these three competitors, one of them created in twenty fourteen. Two of

them are twenty twelve, two of them in twenty fourteen. And I find that very interesting because it was in twenty and fifteen, I believe the first time I remember seeing it was that they began to be very specific about the UN twenty thirty Agenda. It was twenty fifteen, about a year or two after these currencies started coming out, because it is such a fundamental part of

all of that. Prior to that, they had talked about Agenda twenty one, the UN Agenda twenty one, sometime in the twenty first century, we're going to pack everybody into these massive, mega smart cities. And then they got into a very certain date, and it was about that time started saying you will own nothing, we will control everything. So it is Ethereum, and even in Ethereum, Budarin, who was one of the co founders of that, is saying, well, you know, there's some really dystopian things

that CBDC can be used for. But you're starting to see all the big corporations, whether it is MasterCard or whether it's Stripe, all joining together on one of these three players. Peter Thiel is connected with Stellar, and so as open AI's Sam Altman, so they're pushing together on that side of it.

In terms of Ethereum and Booterin. In a September twenty twenty three interview, he said, these digital currencies can provide convenience, but they end up being even less private and they basically break down all of the existing barriers against both corporations and government. At the same time, it said in twenty twenty two, the crypto itself has a lot of dystopian potential if implemented wrong,

and so that's where we are. You know, they have points out in this article going back even looking at connections to the CIA, connections to the NSSA. Bitcoin Secure hash algorithm two fifty six was actually developed by a mathematician who is now the chief mathematician at the NSSA. So a lot of people have said, well, Bitcoin was developed by the NSA. They point out

that this algorithm had been made public before Bitcoin came out. But nevertheless, you've had the CIA bragging about how blockchain technology is quote a powerful but underutilized forensic tool for governments to identify illicit activity and bring criminals to justice. That's CIA Deputy Director Michael Morrell. You see, it is, as he said, it's a boon for surveillance. That's one of the things that I have

a problem with with cryptocurrency. It's one of the reasons why I prefer goal because I'm not interested in the investment aspect of it or the whereas gold relative to the continually fluctuating price or you know, of value of the fiat currency. My concern is really about the surveillance aspect of it, and that's what is open to people with blockchain. Yes, there are some, you know,

there's Monaro, and there's the pirate coin. I can't remember the exact name of it, something about pirate coin, but and I've interviewed him before, one of the people involved with that. But it is that connection to surveillance that I think is the big issue. So we're about to join our guests here. Let's just say one more thing as we do. This is from an article called the End of Money as we know It, which is kind of a paraphrase of the end of the world as we know it,

you know, when everybody's talking about prepping for a total disaster. He says, the central banks prepare the way for digital currencies, which are the closest thing to surveillance disguised as money. Reserves of value are more needed than ever before. Gold is likely to be a good decorrelated asset that protects against the debasement of sovereign bonds and of domestic currencies, as well as surveillance, and

so that's why I'm proud to have Tony as a sponsor. As a support of this program, David Knight dot Gold is what he's set up to take you to wise wolf Gold and you can you know, unlike Costco and Walmart, he will lock in the price for you. They'll tell you I'm sorry, I'm just out of it right now. He'll get you a good price. He'll lock in the price for whatever you want, large or small, and you can purchase that on a regular basis with Wolfpack. So we're going

to take a quick break before we do. By the way, let me just read out some of the names of people who have supported us in December. These are December checks that we got. Really do appreciate this. As I said before, it's going to be a difficult year, I think, because there's a lot of people, even people listen to this program. As I was talking about earlier, you just don't under stand my opposition to Trump for whatever reason. But that's only going to escalate. So I really do

appreciate the support that we got. Let me read through the list real quickly here, because we don't have any other way to get back to the people

who have supported us through cards and via mail. Fred and Jackie Faye super Faye, thank you, Tom and Rachel L, Lloyd P. Philip and Kelly M, Jennifer L, Stephanie K, John R, Ronald C. John W. Jack, H, Mary Ellen, M, Ti S, Jeremy and Amanda, David and Anne, Marie N, Bob S, Minor, Mike Gonzalo, M M A G. Just the initials and Joshua S. David and Wie W, Robin R. Richard R, Heidi W.

Tom and Nancy KA Charlie S. Thank you very much. And again that's Aps and Linda E. And Ron and Deborah H. Thank you very much. Amos Pool also mentioned st a sentate book as well as that and W. Jack. Thank you all of you for the support. We couldn't do this program without your support. We're going to take a quick break and when we come back, we're going to talk to Ryan Christian with the Last American Vagabond. We've got a lot of things we want to talk about. We're

going to talk about floridation. We're going to talk about an article that he's got there about the pathology of the m RNA trump shots as discovered by recently passed away pathologists who came out of retirement to look at the mr mRNA pathology, and also about Pfizer and digital IDs and Gaza, because this is about controlling people. We'll be right back here news now at Apsradionews dot com or get the APS radio apps and never miss another story. You're listening to the

David Knight Show, all right. Joining us now is Ryan Christian of the Last American Vagabond dot com. And I wanted to get Ryan on. I talked about a landmark fluoride lawsuit. I saw this reprinted on Free Thought Project,

but of course it goes back quite a while. The Last American Vagabond has been covering this fluoride trial going back to November of last year, but November of twenty twenty two, and then again in the summer because this is something that has drug on for years in legal limbo and it's now about to come back up in January. So I wanted to get Ryan on to talk about that and some other issues. Thank you for joining us. Ryan, Hey, my pleasure. David. It's an honor to be on with you.

It's a lot of our audience Overlaps and Beans something that people have been asking for for a long time. So it's my pleasure to join. Well, thank you, thank you, it's great to have you on and especially I thought it was very important, and I had not noticed this lawsuit until you've picked it up and you've been on it. As you pointed out, the mainstream media and even conservative media is not really talking about what's going on

this floorid lawsuit. Bring us up to date and as to some of the aspects of this, and we can talk a little bit about what we anticipate is going to happen as it resumes really in this month, but give people

kind of a back ground of what's been happening with us. Yeah, First of all, the credit really goes to Derek Brose, writer for The Last American Bagbaugh, who also runs The Conscious Resistance, who he's been doing this work on this specific topic even before the as we've termed it, the fluoride trial began. So a lot of great credit goes to Derek Brose for keeping

up on this when so many others are. You know, it's such an important topic and so many others, including independent media, aren't really talking about this and it's such an important shift in the understanding, and so for people to understand, there's been a debate about fluoride in your water for a long time, and a quick small background on that. It really breaks down to

being a byproduct that was I mean, think of it this way. It's a byproduct that these companies would otherwise have to pay to dispose of, but ultimately now pay to put into our water under the argument that it somehow benefits our teeth, which I mean, I make the joke all the time where it's like, our government barely wants to take care of us in serious ways, but we're going to pretend we're going to pay money to keep our teeth

white. It just doesn't make any sense. And even then you could talk about floridos the dental fluorosis of the teeth, which is what actually happens when people have too much fluoride. But so really this has been put in our water under you could argue that they think it's good for you or not. The point is that the information over a very long period of time, and it's been it goes back a long time period study after period study finds that

it is damaging. Now there's a whole level when you get into the different science and different opinions of how damaging. But let's be clear, it is not healthy for you, and it has a lot of dangerous effects. It is neurotoxic. And I'll get into the studies that are showing this. The most important point they're pushing in the trial right now is that it is actually hurting your children. It is reducing the IQ of your children, and it

is in fact neurotoxic and it has a lot of delitarious effects. Now the point of the trial, now, this came in regard to the nation National Toxicology Program basically trying to push investigate this study, this toxicology report, where they're trying to basically get this study to be seen and acknowledged by the US government. Now at the moment, they been dragging their feet on this for

I think over four years since this report has been completed. Now, this is the important part, and this is largely because of the fluoride action network. I mean almost entirely. They've been really driving this entire thing. And the report has been finished, the report has been stated to be finished, and every single time it comes to a sort of a point of culmination, they argue something's needed. We need another report, we need another evaluation this

time. And this is you know, there's a lot we could get into in between all of that, right, And what it came down to in the last year Derek's been covering this is they essentially said, look, we have the report that's done, It has all the information included. You guys have checked off on it. Just because you want another group that's not included to reevaluate this does not change the fact that the report has been completed and

it shows exactly what you guys are trying to refuse to show. And all that ultimately happened was interestingly enough, of all people, Rachel Levine put her basically stepped in and said, no, we're going to pause this and this is publicly discussed until further notice. And that was after all these differ delays. Now Judge Chen, who is the one who's been involved in this entire process, basically agreed with this. You can sense frustration through these processes and

this entire time it's been done via zoom because of COVID nineteen. Are the illusion they're in. And now what's happened today or rather over the last so many months weeks is they ultimately Judge Chen came back and said, Okay, we're going to have the final push for this. It's going to be in person. So one thing, we're trying to fly out or we're going to be flying out Derek to cover this in person, trying to raise some funds

for that, and he's going to be going either way. And what we're expecting is the actual culmination here where I don't see how they can get away with another dragging of their feet. This is going to be the moment we're hoping where they essentially go, Okay, the report is public, here's what it shows, and then it really is a game of who chooses to acknowledge it, which we already know how that works. Oh yeah, but it's

there and the evidence is astoundingly clear. Well, you know, it's interesting, and you talk about this in your articles as well as CDC says, so this is our crowning achievement, you know, the twentieth century until I

guess they get their MR and A vaccines. But really what we're talking about here above and beyond the debate over medical issues, is we're talking about coarse consumption or course treatment, right, and so in that way, it ties to what we've just been through with the medical martial law in the last couple

of years, very tightly to that. We see the CDC is going to decide whether going to put in your body one way or the other, put it in the water supply or put it in and course you through you know, the vaccine programs. You're not going to go anywhere, do anything, or have a job unless you get this. So they're all about this forced medication and to me, that ought to be the showstopper right there. You know, even we got a lot of data that's gone over a lot of

years. Harvard even did a study talking about the correlation between lower IQ and children and fluoridation in the water. So you know, we can have these arguments, and we should have these arguments about this, but to me, it kind of feels like, for the longest time, it feels like, you know, the debate that we had over just the MRI vaccine. You know, it's like, well, this is something is new, it's not been tested, but regardless, you don't have any right to coerce me into

this. And that's really what is that the basis of all this fluorite stuff. It's big corporations working with CDC for their financial benefit, and they're forcing you to consume this stuff. That's that's the worst thing. Not only are they ripping us off, but they're poisoning us and one way after the other,

aren't they. Yeah, that's such an important point, and I exactly where I'm coming from in this is that obviously we should be engaging with the fact that these things are dangerous and they're killing people and in the sense of the COVID nineteen injections, and that's an important primary part of this. But

obviously the central conversation should be around whether or not it's dangerous. Do they have the right to just coerce you into doing this or I mean, I agree with the word coerce in this, however, but people would argue that essentially it's not being coerced, that's being put but ultimately the same conversation, right that you are. You ultimately don't have a choice here unless you want to. And this is the choice game they play with the COVID nineteen injections.

Well you can go buy bottled water. Well, not everybody has the option to do that, and ultimately it's not healthy anyway. So I think it's an early example of how they were trying to and to your point, go back and state for this long period of time that that's our crowning achievement, trying to create the illusion, the understanding, the impression that this was a success. And that's why that's the precedent for X, Y and Z

coming next. And there's been conversations about lithium in the water. I mean, I often point to this a study that's been done more than once in fact, where at high levels, ANDIH was one of them discussing that should there be a need for some kind of in this case, it was a bioethics like an mRNA conversation, a need for something like that to be done

compulsory like we saw with COVID nineteen. They'd argue time and again that it should be done secretly because well, they don't understand and that wasn't peer reviewed science, that was before COVID nineteen. So I think that plays a factor. But the whole point is the mindset of what they think they're allowed to do, whether or not really it's counterdeow constitutional rights, and they know that that's right. And as we look at this to bring this up to date

and to look forward into the future. We now see these people because hey, we know that you don't like to get the shots, and so we're not going to stick a needle in your arm. Instead, we got these other forms of delivery, including aerosol mRNA, So there's a lot of talk about that. Let's talk about putting it into our food, mRNA shots and

things like that. So again, if we let this principle stand that they can put stuff in without our knowledge, without our consent, they're going to find a way to do that with many other products, and probably already are you know, it's certainly food additives and other things like that that are happening, and the way they've contaminated so many things. But again, wherever we

see this, we need to oppose this openly. What they're trying to do in a hidden way without our consent, and it's going to come across a whole spectrum of things. Let me also point out too, something else that I think correlates with the vaccine stuff, and that is the dosage. Right, how do you control the dosage for something that you jump into the water. Well, I think the answer is that you don't you know, they can come up with a concentration of it, but that's not necessarily going to

the concentration that you get out of it. And then when you dump it into the water, you're giving the same dosage of this to a baby that you're giving to a two hundred pound man. Okay, So how do they justify something like that? And when you look at the mRNA aspect of it, when you had the mRNA shots going out, we now know from looking at these different lots that different lots varied by factor of thirty three from the

lowest to the highest dosage. The highest dosage was thirty three times which you would get at the lowest dosage. To me, that looks very much like what they're doing in terms of dumping this stuff in the water. And if you don't control for dosage, any medication, even something that's beneficial, turns into a poison. Yes, we all said exactly, And I think this overlaps with the first point you made in regard to the m RNA where it's

going. But you know, the first obvious point there is such an important thing to think about, is that they in any number of these conversations, you can see that kind of disregard for the dose conversation actually, and I wanted to point out that in regard to a lot, I think that's a

really important conversation that we that still needs more investigation. But one of the arguments that I want people to remember is I think it was Ryan Cole made the argument that it's not necessarily that that proves that was a deliberate act, which I'm completely considering that it is, but that he argues that it's part of it is that they are the m RNA essentially, or rather the lipid nanoparticles broke down and in ultimately that then changed or altered the dose comparatively in

one case anyway, and argue that in some cases that might have actually saved people's lives. But you know, the m r and itself is dangerous by protein and so on. But to your other point, and I just want to include that because I think it's fascinating kind of where look, just so it's clear, I one percent think there was deliberate mouthfisence and then deliberate actual

criminal action to hurt people. I really believe that. But it's interestant to think about the fact that overlapped with that there was just simple mistakes by people that don't care about your safety in you know, in conclusion, in combination. But to your other let me say, before we look at that, you know, when we look at that, and I made this point, when we looked at it, it's like a factor of thirty three. It's like thirty three hundred percent more dosage. Said, how in the world does

this happen in pharmaceutical world? Right? Yeah, they're so careful about the dosages and the quantities that they put out there. And they have to be because, as I said before, it turns into a poison. How could you have a manufacturer that's kind of again, maybe it's something about the lipid nanoparticles breaking down. I don't know, but it seems to me that is

so extreme. I can't imagine how that could be done in a pharmaceutical environment without deliberate malfeasance with that or whatever you want to call it, maliciousness, you know, but it seems to be that it have to be a deliberate process. But go ahead to the other point, Well, and I agree completely. I think that really it matters obviously whether it's delibered or not.

But in the larger sense, it kind of doesn't. It just shows you that either way, obviously, it still leans in the point that we should have a choice here, either there making so many mistakes that are killing people or they're choosing to It kind of amounts to the same point. But on the other side of it, the m R and a part of it.

To overlap that with what you were saying, it's exactly one of my biggest fears around all of this is either the step that's already taken that we're unaware of or that we haven't acknowledged, or that is about to happen, which is in regard to the self spreading and really the same one step before that, the self amplifying vaccines, which I think that's what this already is. They've already argued this. One of Pfizer's earliest documents said self amplifying in regard

to their Pfizer BNT two one B two. I think that series and then that went away, and all that really needs is that essentially continues to produce the spike protein in a simplified way, and that's what we know is happening already. As I think doctor Peter mccolaugh in an unchallenged peer if you'd study that still stands on Elisa her the sustained synthesis of the spike protein, that's

what we're seeing. It's undeniable, and we'll get into Arnt burkhartt same point, finding spike protein and all over the body and the same kind of things. But my point is that the self spreading, which I again question whether that might have already been used. The omicron overlap, that seems to be kind of a similar point and where it started in Botswana or where they claim it was South Africa and diplomats that we can't verify that came from Botswana,

you know, diplomatic community. It seems like something was executed there. My point, though, is that self spreading, whether happening or next step is it keeps me up at night. We're talking about something that's already been designed. They've talked about this going back as far as I don't know if you're familiar with it, but it's called insect Allies. It was a CDC program that scientists around the world signed documents saying, you know, we know what

you're doing. This is dual use technology. It's a weapon, and they made it. But they just kind of walked it back. Now we're talking about the same concept with with pathogens or whatever you want to understand it as, where it's something that can be released that literally spreads from person to person and they proudly say and it inoculates these people and there's no need for informed consent, like that's a proud statement coming from the people discussing this. That

really concerns me. And to your point, there's no dosage there. You can get back, you know, inoculated whatever you want to call it, over and over and over if you're around the same people with the same thing happening. I don't know how they make sense of that. And you know, there's also, you know, besides the aerosol delivery that they're talking about and putting it in food they're talking about, there's also the issue of shedding.

I was just talking to a friend this last weekend back in Austin, and he never took the vaccine, but he's he's got very sick with COVID and it's taken out his hearing in one ear as he's so congested with He went to the dog, didn't get into his chest into pneumonia, but he went to the doctor and they were doing some blood tests and they were trying to draw the blood out and he said it literally took them like twenty minutes to get a sufficient amount of blood to come out. He said, the

blood just wasn't flowing. The technicians said, have you had a problem like this before? He us, no, it's his blood was super, super thick. And so the question is, you know, is this something that is spreading even to unvaccinated people. They don't want there. They have nothing but contempt for our consent, that's the key thing. And they don't follow any procedures or testing, you know, they don't. They don't even pretend to do testing to see if this stuff is safe or not. We've had

that discussion through this MR and A stuff all along. And that's really began though with fluoride many many years ago. As you point out, it was an industrial waste product that they would have had to pay a lot of money to get rid of. It's used as rat poison in China. And yet if they told everybody that this is going to be something's going to help your teeth, they could get paid to dump it into our water. That's the

most amazing thing, isn't it? It is? It is. And one more point before we go, if we go back to Florida, just that the overlap there you made is so important that it's This is why I'm convinced

this was not by accident. That every single choice made, whether we're talking about the choice to make people wear cloth masks, where a payovid study in twenty fifteen proved that increase your risk of illness, every choice that was made deliberately seemed to well, I think deliberately seemed to increase all the problems.

But if the overlap of both mechanisms here or redligious aspects of it, the m r and A itself, as you pointed out, is at least now being discussed, as I think it was an overlap of MIT and Harvard of the both the aerosolization of it and as well as the fact that it can be deployed, you know, via particle like so they can release all the nanoparticles and it can inoculate you in the same way. They say, So,

that's one side of it, and let's not forget the technology. They argue is that m RNA is the instruction to create the spike protein But then, as you point out, the spike protein itself, however, that comes along in and of itself, is cytotoxic. That Salk Institute proved that with a pyravieed study, and the point was that itself, and this was the

main point. They said, the spike protein is capable of shedding, or rather they did in that stity they didn't say shedding, but rather just the in and of itself can cause disease, which means that gives you symptoms, which means it can then be spread. So whatever you want to call that, how is that not a self spreading concept? I mean that's what we're you know, you get the spike protein is delivered, then it spreads to

somebody else. But the real problem is that we also know as doctor Warren, Luigi Warren, who was one of the primary people in regard to this technology itself, the discovery of m RNA, said that yes, of course it can shed. Rather the spike protein itself, he said, of course it can shed, but he argued at the time that it was not likely to get you sick because the amount was so small. But we've then later come to find out that it was sustained synthesis. So it's all there if

you really just look at the information. So you're definitely spreading spike protein. And to your question, I really don't know whether it's a risk. I would imagine it clearly is to the average person. But you know, it's about keep being healthy and fighting things off like anything, you know, But ultimately I think that's a deliberate action. Oh yeah, yeah, I said.

From the very beginning, I said, okay, so as they're describing this self replicating, and you know, as Trump had his little dog and Pony show, he went around the table, how long is it going to take you? That's too long, next person is faster, and then they finally get to the punchline. It's like, well, we can do it right now, because we can turn your body into a manufacturing plant. And I said, okay, So as they're describing this sounds like cancer or something,

I said, how you turn this thing off? You know, how do you stop this? And it turns out, as people are starting to see, no, it doesn't turn off. It keeps going on, it keeps replicating, it keeps amplifying, as you pointed out. And so that's that's where we are with this but again, I think the fluoride thing is healthy, is important from a health standpoint, and I think it's also important that people see the bigger picture and how this has been done for many decades.

They really kind of set this precedent of coerced ingestion of their stuff for their corporate cronies, and I think there's a lot of that that is connected. Let me ask you this though, as we move forward to this, yere talking about the report that was there, and there's an article that just came out saying that in that last Wednesday, there was a let me find the thing. Yeah, here it is report linking florid to lower IQ and children has made public after the CDC and the HHS tried to block it.

Is that something that's a new development, because you've been talking about this for a long time. Is that the report that I call him Dick Divine, Rachel Levine or whatever. Is that the report that he tried to suppress? Or is this something that we that is different from that. Yeah, I'm not I'm not familiar with what article you're referencing. If it's new, then it's old. I mean, Derek covered that exact point. I think maybe six months ago, I think the same report. So basically this is in

the opening discussion. I don't think I mentioned that. The reason that we know and verbatim what the report already shows is because it was leaked. It already information was already released, it was already discussed, and it's already present. Now that's what's so crazy is that you could we linked to the report in our coverage, so it's already present, and yet the corporate media nobody's talking about it. And so yeah, that might if it's a new article,

that's a little bit of old news. But I'm glad it's getting out to people. You know, it's important because it's damning. I mean, it really is. There's literally nothing in there that even gives you the indication that there might be a benefit to it. And that's why I think they're dragging their feet. That's the craziest part to think about. So they're aware

of what it says, they're not even disputing what it says. They're just going like, well, let's get more evaluation from groups that have no historical being involved in this process, you know, and yet they are okay allowing it to continue to be in your water while tering your children. But we know different than in vaccinations or anything else we're talking about. But it just shows a level of deliberate harm I think, you know, like choosing to

let this happen. Oh yeah, absolutely. And you know they've played this game with a scientist who said, well, we've got our conclusion, let us put it out there. If you disagree with it, you can do that, but that's not the way the game's played. The way the game is played is to shut down anything that goes against their narrative. And that even happens of course internally, when you've got government scientists who are talking about

the dangers of floride, they're just going to suppress that. That's where we are right now, and that's why it's very important for people to see. You know, Last American Vagabond, you guys have been covering this stuff and thanks for doing that. It's just amazing to me how nobody really seems to care about anything except the presidential election. It is ain't going to change anything. You know, if you're going to get focused on politics, focus locally

as to what's going to happen there. But you know, it takes up everybody's it's all about entertainment, it's about national politic, and yet none of the people in national politics are going to put any restrictions on the CDC. Let alone get rid of it. This predatory organization that's been poisoning us since the middle of the twentieth century, just in the water, let alone the vaccines that they're involved in. You've got an article at Last American Vagabond about

Arnie bert Hardt. Tell us a little bit about this guy who came out of retirement to take a look at mRNA. Yeah, we're very, very very proud of this work, and Taylor or Hudak deserves every ounce of credit for the amazing work that was done here. She's a writer and interviewer for The Last American Vagabond. It's profound and quite frankly, probably one of the things I'm most proud of that we've ever done at The Last American Vagabond.

And it's a high level, multi camera in his lab interview, and this was the final interview he gave before he died, and there's a lot of discussion to be had around that. That's something that I think we're going to

dive into going forward. But it's a very strange circumstance. So he, as you said, he came he you know, it was basically in the process of retiring, was you know that it was as he says in the interview, it was something somebody contacted him with this information and he kind of felt drawn to do something about it, and and that draw him drew him back into this. And so he was, as we now know looking back, one of the few people that was willing that we're willing to go through

and do what they thought was right, you know. And that's one of the things, by the way, to state right out of the gate that is just over it's just blowing over the top. In this interview, his integrity is impossible to miss. Ever, is what he's doing is is at his expense, and it was doing it because he thought it was right, you know, going to the point to where he was working with other German pathologists and in the beginning until suddenly, whoever, whatever happened, somebody told

him no, they thought it was conspiracy theory. They all just dropped it and ran. And so he was the light. He got pulled into it and then ended up being the only one really driving this forward save for the people in his inner circle. So the bottom line is that he was a you know, very very highly respected pathologist and he went into this world and started doing autopsies where people, as you well know, we're not doing them

like this is the lie that we were sold from the CDC. As like I broke down in the first year, they're not doing the work they claim they were doing in the investigation around the people they claim are dying, they're not, you know, or rather I think more so into the second year when the injections were given in regard to the byproducts of what was happening.

And they remember, they claimed we're investigating every one of them, until it came out that they didn't have the resources to do that, let alone the autopsies, let alone and interview everybody, you know, And so he started doing this and lo and behold, it was exactly what we found. And I think the two other examples that I've seen of autopsies that it's your body is being overwhelmed with this process. I mean, and we can get into

the different then. To be clear, I'm in no way an expert like he was, and even Taylor I think is far more immersed in the interworkings of how these things all operate. But really coming down to just some of the things I'd pulled up. The first part of it was the assumption of what was really being caused in the process of these injections. And so people were, like we all saw, they were saying, well, this looks like this, therefore it was caused by COVID, and nobody was doing in

the histopathology. Nobody was really diving into it to find these things out. And what he ultimately found is what we what we all talk about the thrombocides thrombosis. Even doctor Bakti made this claim right in the first year. If Armber correctly, the vi t T vaccine induced thrombocide thrombosis is thrombocidepenia. And so as he points out in this that it's really about this is your body's process to try to like heal the problems that are being created by by the

injection. But see the problem is that it's never stopping, so it causes

all these blood claws. He talks about lymphocytic inflammation, which is the kind of you know, I've talked about systemic inflammation for a long time, and I think that's what ultimately develops into and then the he argues the most alarming problem, and this is what he argued was the vascolitis the argument about the you know, the brain and the as well as the end of the wheel cells and the blood vessels, and how this is all causing the blood cloths,

the breakdown of your system. I personally find the most alarming aspect of this to be the sperm point. And he made this point before this interview and in a public presentation, but he really made this clear in this interview with Taylor that there, in my opinion, there's just no way that this was an accident. I mean, you can go back as far as you want and find other research showing the same overlap. Knowing how this process works,

that he basically shows that these are passing through your sperm. And I mean, I think doctor Peter mccola has made that point as well. I mean, and I don't know how we get away from something like that. I often make the point about glyphosate in the sense that we had a chance in time to maybe stop what they did with that. But this point, it's the world around, it's in the area breathing, it's in the clothes

you're wearing. It's literally everywhere. And so how we stop this I think should be another main focus in regard to the spread of these kind of things. But we're right now battling with people's awareness of whether this is even the case. That's the hard part, that's right. Yeah, we've got a lot of scientists and medical people who are now looking at this. But of course, from the very beginning, the same type of stuff we're talking about

with fluoride was the big warning sign about this. It's not been tested. We know what these people are doing. Yeah, and they've come up with all these he's talking about, Oh well look this is long COVID, or now they talk about holiday heart, or this is a new variant is going to come after your heart, or the brain fog. There was a study I talked about yesterday. They said, well, you know, look at

this brain fog, that it must be due to COVID. They said, as they did the study, they found that it was due to people being in the hospital. So they said, it's not the hospital though. It's serious illness always no matter what it points to. I had an orthopedic surgeon who got the shot because he's being coerced into doing it, and it ended his career. He can't do surgery anymore. And with all the horrible symptoms that he was having, he went to doctor after doctor and they would just

say, no, I'm not going to touch this. They're afraid of this. There's one of the reasons why Bert Haardt, who is retired, I think he came out and he didn't have you know, you know, it makes it easier when you don't have your career on the line, but you know, it's still it's a bold thing to come out and opposed this and

to expose this. And perhaps he did pay the price for this, but for doing that, but for the most part, finally, this orthopedic surgeon that I interviewed, he found a doctor he said, well, I know what it is, and you know what it is, but we're not going to say that, and I'll help to try to treat you with this. That's how afraid everybody is of identifying what this Trump shot is doing to people. Yeah. Yeah, I also, and I believe he was also an

orthopedic surgeon. Doctor Malik I just recently interviewed similar similar point, except he basically went to you know, he went with the truth and ultimately lost his career for it, and now he's spreading, you know, trying to do podcasts and just talk about this, and so I was all like promoting his work because it's you know, anybody that's willing to sacrifice everything for the truth as somebody that I respect, you know, It's yeah, it's really this

whole process has been so overwhelmingly obvious from day one in my opinion, you know, the everything seemed to be clear, and the almost deliberate effort to both create the circumstance to drive this on people. And this is where I get into the question of what the ultimate outcome, what the ultimate driving purpose was of all this, And I think it is ultimately to create the setting sort of like we talked about the fluoride step into what we're doing now for

whatever is coming next. And I think that this has been a resounding failure. Doctor Fauci has written articles in Cell dot com that make the argument that

this didn't work, and we're not even taking a step back. I mean they're now driving aggressively into things like ferret nanoparticle, universal flu vaccines that's literally about to come out or a pan coronavirus vaccine also using ferret nanoparticles, which I mean The Guardian wrote an article about this, I think in two thousand and six in regard to how these the ferret and nanoparticle injections were used to

literally control the movements of these animals and an insect. Now that may sound ridiculous to some people, but this is The Guardian covered this, and it's a peer reviewed science that overlaps with people that were involved with the COVID nineteen injection, one of them being Bob Langer with the co founder of Maderna. These things are very real and it's an alarming step that I think we're seeing. That's why I think this conversation of what we're doing is so important.

People realize, you know, not what's coming next, but that it's already happening, you know, right, that's right. Yeah. When we look at nano tech, that's one of the things that is so you just don't know what they're capable of doing. It's got like infinite possibilities, and you know, as people look at artificial intelligence and some of these other things, I think the most apaque of all of these is really nano tech. That

people don't really understand the capabilities that are there. But when we look at the overall picture, and I've talked about this with Netanyahu and pushing his own people in Israel as labrats, pushing them Defiser and of course, you know, I've played the clips of him multiple times calling doing a teleconference with the World Economic Forum Davos, talking about how he's constantly on the phone with Moderna and all these other people, how they're using his people as lab rats.

It's just amazing. And yet you know, another part of it was they were they were really leading in terms of tying a digital ID. That's a big part of where this is all coming. And you've got an article that came out just to let's say, December twenty seventh, just the end of last week, Pfiser is experimenting in Gaza with a digital ID, just the

beginning of this. So tell us now what is happening. We know what what Netanyahu did to you know, push Israel to the front of the line, uses people as lab rats to collect data for Pfizer and then to push the digital ID. What is happening now in Gaza with that? Well, just to clarify the title, and this is the way my title my shows often that there's a comment that's kind of like separate topics, but but ultimately

the Pfiser part of it is there. They're right now experimenting with a A it is stated an experimental injection to fight what was I think a fungus of undefined origin. And this and this goes into the very alarming scussion about what's been done to Gaza. And I'm not even getting into the bombing aspect of it, just the deliberate kind of destabilization, the flooding, which weirdly was stopped to discuss they no a lot to talk about on the corporate media.

And right after that happened, we saw this flooding and yes it was raining, but I've never seen this kind of flooding before in the area. Asked to add their flooding underneath the ground that rose up to their waste into many places, you know, and so that what that caused is what they worried about, was a massive spreading of waste, and you know, it caused

the spreading of illness. So one part of it is wondering whether this was deliberate, right and then and then asker I mean, we've talked about the I'm sure you have discussed before, the concept of Israel's battle tested weapons that they test on Palestinians and then sell as battle tested. So I wonder what

this kind of dynamic is. As you mentioned as Netanyah who openly stated that this is Pfiser's or rather Pfiser called at Pfiser's lab, as he openly stated that they were allowing them to find out how these things worked on people. So what they're using as an injection that Pfiser of course is testing and it's it's barely tested, it's experimental, and interestingly, this is designed to stop in one case Candida Albacon, which was guess what the thing that was spreading

through hospitals during all of the COVID nineteen discussion. So I don't know if there's an exact point that makes that overlap, but I found that interesting either case, The point is that Pfeiser yet again is being allowed to experiment on the Israeli people, or in this case, the Palestinian people, because they're being told they can based on something that we can't even define. The digitalied part of it was just going into the deeper part of it which I can't

easily overlap with Israel. The point you made and all of this is, I mean, this is a universal agenda, as I think you're well aware of, and this is going around the world, and it is already happening now. I think what is the original drive was sort of as we all saw the vaccine passport and the argument that that was in one that we're stepping into a technological world, so we shouldn't do paper anymore, but rather that it was safer and less dangerous germs in the paper, you know, And

so that didn't work. I mean, clearly people pushed back. They tried. It worked in some cases, but it wasn't as sound as I think they wanted. Now it's sort of coming the other way, and this is how I see this happening. And this is where you know Israel's involved with the CBDC aspect, and what they're creating is this justification for digital currency. In the same discussion, right, they say paper money is dangerous and spreads

pathogens. And so what I believe is now going to happen is sort of the inverse of what I expected, which is that the CBDC aspect is going to be pushed on us, maybe because of some mass event that wipes out all of their you know, paper money records and they have to dole out digital currency. Like that's a worry that I have. But then that will be the point at which, and this is my guess, where they say,

oh, well, we'll give you back your digital currency. We don't worry you didn't lose anything, as long as you sign up for this digital ID that then will allow you to have it. I mean, who wouldn't go through that process to get what they think is theirs back, you know, the money you stored in a bank before the EMP or whatever happens. Now I'm not saying I think that's happening. I just think that's a possibility. So that being said, last point is just that this is how we're

seeing this driven in everywhere around the world, coercion. As you're pointing out the justification that is needed because these people in South America don't have rights without it, which is a lie or you know, any number of ways that's happening, that's right, and that's when I can't That's why I tried to get people to understand the way the government gets what it wants. Is usually

not with direct mandates and coercion. It's usually with bribery. And you know, they can conveniently, with some kind of a financial crisis take everything away from you and then doll this out. That's what they did. Bill Gates did with odhar and India went to the poor people and said, well, we'll give you health care, we'll give you welfare, but you're gonna have to take the number. And so I think that's going to be the way

they're going to do this. So probably even pull kind of a world coin type of thing and say, hey, you know this this new stuff here. We're going to give you special treatment, reduce the taxes or something, or you know, here's some free money, but you've got to sign up for this stuff. And so it'll be that way. It'll be done as something that you must accept or that you made as an offer for you to accept. But they will make your life very difficult if you don't accept it.

They will take things away and then offer this is a carit to you. And that's the way the federal government always operates. They operate by using their ability to create money out of thin air. They use it to bribe states and local governments to you know, here's a bunch of money. Now, if you don't do X, we're going to take that money away. It doesn't matter whether you're talking about the boys in the girls bathroom or whether

you're talking about any of these other issues. I think that is going to be the way they're going to operate. They're going to create some kind of a crisis. This will be their helping hand to you. It won't probably come to you as a mandate. And that's the scary thing because this is being pushed by the CBDC and the digital ID stuff, and everything's being pushed by both Biden and the Trump administration was being was pushing it. Jared Kushner

when he was there, was pushing CBDC. And so for the most part, the politicians won't even talk about this. And as you point out, every country, every political philosophy, every political party was marching in lockstep to this global agenda throughout twenty twenty. It truly was amazing to see, and it is amazing, I think, Ryan, as I try to talk about

this, people just well Trump never forced anything on anybody. It's like, okay, you know, we just we got this partisan blindness about this because we're lined up behind you know, the left or the right, or the Republicans or Democrats, and we can't say what is actually being done to us and what they're going to do in the future. But I think you're right. I think it will be presented to us as well, here's this this nice stuff that you can We're going to help you out after the problems that

we created. That's always what they do. Well, what I often have said over the years is it starts. That's how it starts every time, where it's just like we saw with the COVID injection. Is you know here this, if you take this thing or you do this action, you get to go to the front of the line. Yeah. Right. But then eventually when especially if nobody does it, they go okay, But now if you don't do it, now you go to the back of the line.

Right then it becomes well, if you don't do what, you're killing grandma, so you have to do it, right. Like, that's the escalation we've seen. And so that's where I worry about this is I feel like we've already passed that step where they're trying to go like, look, at this great new thing. So I worry that it's going to be something that's a little bit more coercive or like a rug pull kind of an action.

But you know, I think that it all very clearly shows you that the same people that you know, A good example is something like the GMO program. Right, how is it possible that we have somebody like Bill Gates who has spectacularly in worldview failed, Right, the company, the countries that they were pushing GMOs are more food and secure now than they were before they push that agenda. So the point is we let them just try again with another

GMO product. You know, these people are connected with all of this and then includes the CBDCs that includes you know, it's all interconnected. Now. For those that feel like that somehow starts to develop into an image of what you think you're supposed to dispute as conspiracy theory, it's just a reality of

the way the world works. As you well know, David, the powerful people will often collect conspire if you will, you can use whatever word you want to decide what they will do to gain more power to influence their position. And you know, you could pretend that sometimes that overlaps with what's best for the people. Quite frankly, I think that's just a coincidence when that

happens. Oh yeah, yeah, it absolutely is true, and just flying trying to explain to people it doesn't matter what country or what party, but it blinds people because they get into these political loyalties to really see what's going on, and it is across the board. And that's what's so dangerous about this is that they control and manipulate us with this phony competition between different groups that are both pushing for the same thing. And so that's why it's very

important. I want to keep a track of what's going on with the fluoride stuff, so I know we'll be talking again about that. That's a very important thing. And again it shows the long term disregard for our choice as well as a portion of consumption of this stuff that in and of itself ought to be something that people push back against. And they need to realize that

this has been going on for decades. It's been going on through Republicans and Democrats being in charge in Washington. It really doesn't matter from that standpoint. So we really do have to fight this, bring up awareness of it, and maybe we can get people start fighting this at the local level. That's

really ultimately is there where theyump and into the water. So if you can stop this at the local level, then you're on your way to getting control of individual health and taking it away from these public health dictators that really have established themselves in the last couple of years. It's great talking to you again, Ryan Christian and it is the Last American Vagabond. Dot com is where you'll find these articles in a great interview. Take a look at that interview

with Arnie Berkhart that we were talking about. A lot to learn from that. Thank you so much. Tryan great talking to you, My pleasure, David. If I could just leave you with one one in general, I think it's important, you know, maybe we could talk about this in the future, maybe have you on my show and so on, about the idea of you know, as far more than just where we talked about today and akin disrupting chemicals, you know, all the different things that are just drenched.

Our world is drenched with these things and they don't care about our health. And so we'll be covering this more and you know that way that includes lifeless state, what's in the injections and so on. But Derek is going to be covering the florid trial, so make sure you keep track of that and we'll be talking soon about that in general. And it's an honor to be on the show, David. So it is nice. Thank you and thank you for being on top of this when everybody else is ignoring it.

And you know, we can throw into all that soup, even things like five G. You know, the health effects of five G another example they don't care and another example of how it comes back to surveillance. The surveillance is not even a question, you know, but there is a lot of evidence to show that the health effects of five G and other things. But again, we got to have this because you know, we got to beat the Chinese and that type of thing. It is absolutely it's absolute insanity.

All we can try to do is try to inform people about this. So thank you so much for what you do. Ryan appreciate it. The Last American Vagabond dot com that's where you can keep up with what's going on with the fluoride stuff as well as many other issues. Thank you, Ryan, appreciate it. Have a good day, all right, We're going to be right back, folks. Stay with us. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing. Check out the Jazz channel at apsradio dot com and the APS Radio

app and leave the stress behind making sense. Comment again, you're listening to the David Night Show. All right, welcome back. And this is a comment. I didn't see this before Ryan was gone. This is from Christer Ripperger. Thank you very much for the tip, and I wrote love you, Ryan, so glad to see you connecting with David. No one is reporting as thoroughly or objectively in the Middle East as Ryan and the Last American

Vagabond. No one reported on COVID with as much source material as Ryan the Last American Vagabond and DK should conect regularly like Siliny, Yes we should and on rock Finn Guard Goldsmith, good to see you their guard and thank you for the tip. I mean Guard host of the show for a week and he gives me at tip. He says, thank you David, and welcome

back. Thanks for the excellent, excellent information and for talking with Ryan, whose work is consistently valuable and essential to the fight for truth and freedom. It's going to be a good year with people like you. Two men doing what you do, and with Guard doing what he's doing at Liberty Conspiracy and MRCTV as well, thank you Guard for what you do. On Rockfinn Max b thank you for the tip. He says, I follow both of you guys, and this is like an all star game. Thank you. Yeah,

he's got a lot of information there. It's very important. And again, you know, we see these patterns that are there and regard list of how the floor ide affects your body or how the Trump shots affect your body, we see these overriding principles that just tell us right from the bat, right off the bat's wrong, that's wrong. Let's talk a little bit in the time that we got left. We've got about twelve minutes or so. This is an interesting article by David Garnowski on gab dot com and I've had

this since before Christmas, but it is pretty much timeless. It transcends the news cycle. I think that we have to think outside the government box and we need to think about how we are going to transcend this and how we're going to transform our lives. And as part of this, and this article is titled Peter Teele was right about Adams Adams. He quotes an Atlantic story

they said, quote Peter Teele is taking a break from democracy. The article attempts to explain his recent renunciation of political donations as a result of being burned out by lack of return politicians, provide his vision to move America towards growth, particularly and as Teal calls it, the world of Adams. Well, again, I think that this is a good example. You know Elon Musk,

and I agree with what Elon Musk said. He said, you know, the place where you're going to have really the least amount of effect is on federal elections. I think he realized that more so than Peter Teel. I think Elon Musk is the richest man in the world because he understands how

to read politicians and how to get money from them for his projects. And so he says, you know, George Soros realized that he could go to the local level and he could affect elections at the local level with district attorney and that type of thing, or even you know, at the state level with state you know, attorney general's attorneys general. And so he said, you know, that's a much more effective place to do it. And I've talked to many people who have pointed out, you know, in their state,

how they've had a lot more effect working on local laws. They could never get anything done in Washington. That's what Peter Teele has understood. But he said. David Gonowski says the article misses the bigger point Teal makes about the dangers of stagnation in favor of catering to the Atlantic audience's mirror induced paranoias about Trump, fascism and strange libertarian wealth. He says, the atom bomb

is you know Teel was talking about that. The atom bomb project is touted by Teal and his followers as one of the last greatest things that the government did. Is it really well, is that really a great thing? I've come to look at that, and I think when we talk about a just war, one of the things that's happening, and there's really guy's a conflict.

And I said this from the very beginning, as I kept all of them talking about Pearl Harbor, they said, well, maybe they're trying to send us a message, because it certainly does raise questions like Pearl Harbor died, How did this happen without any you know who was standing Guard when all

this stuff happened. And as I said before, you know the fact that FDR decided that you know, they knew that the Japanese were going to do this, but they kept the warning from going out, didn't warn anybody, and actually kept the warning from going out, and said, still doesn't still

doesn't excuse what Japan did. They still struck first, and that's precisely what FDR was trying to do, and perhaps that was what Netanyahu was trying to do, because you know, a just war and everybody understands this instinctively. You know, we have this kind of moral understanding that you know, if somebody attacks you, you have a right to self defense, and so that's part of a justified war. But another part of a justified war is to try to limit it, to try to end it as soon as possible,

to try to stop the aggression, and also to protect civilian life. And I look at it as we see this continuous bombing in this union, now asymmetric warfare, and now the asymmetric warfare is all on the side of Israel. And when I look at how the war ended, for years, I bought the argument that, well, yeah, they bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki because it was going to be a bloody fight from island to island, and they

were going to actually save lives. But as I look at it, I start to have questions, did we eradicate massive civilian populations in order to save lives in terms of a military conflict that is very antithetical to what Western civilization when it was a civilization, I would say, in terms of when it was a civilization that had ethics. It's exactly contrary to adjust war. And this is one of the reasons why I think people are looking at what is

happening in Gaza. It appears to be just. And this is this has been a key part of war since World War Two. We went after civilian populations and continue to go after civilian populations. We do preemptive strikes and all the rest of this stuff. So that is the world that we live in now. But again, what Peter Teel is talking about was this was a great achievement to produce an atomic bomb. His narrative is that the victory in

World War II for the ennobled America's technological frontier spirit. Like nineteen twenties cinema, post World War two erascience fiction saw robots and flying cars just around the corner. Then teal laments. Beginning sometime in the seventies, America's standard. America started to grow cynical about science and technology, and we rested on our laurels to the detriment of wages and real growth. Well, the reality of all this is that he sees us as being lazy and pacified. But I

don't think that's the issue. I think the issue is that we began to worship science. And I mean that very seriously, you know, and just take a look at recently Valci I, mister science, worship me. Bow down, do everything that I say because science I don't have to explain it

to you. This is again when we're looking at Peter Teele is somebody who is coming from a technocracy perspective, and it's one of the reasons why he and Elon Musk can develop things because they're very focused on I can do attitude, and that's good, but it's not good when that replaces basic morality. And along that line, I want to play for you something that I looked

at. I was spending some time just doing research and thinking over the break that I had, and I went back and I found a debate between Christopher Hitchens, who had just written God is Not Great, and with John Lennox, a mathematician in the UK. I'm going to play you a brief excerpt between the two of them. So Heaven has already watched almost one hundred percent of its creation die off, often in very unpleasant, callous circumstances with folded

arms. Right. And that's billions of years of geological time. Some people say the homosapiens has been around for one hundred thousand years, some for as long as a quarter of a million. No one says less than one hundred thousand. Francis Collins, the great Christian believer who did the human genome project, says, certainly one hundred thousand. I'll take a hundred. Richard Dawkins thinks it's more. I'll take a hundred. What does it mean if we're

divinely supervised and divinely created and what looked out for? It means that for ninety eight or so thousand of those years humans Homo sapiens were being born, dying, half of them in childbirth. I would think life expectancy maybe of twenty years. Maybe thirty people dying essentially of their teeth, out of hideous diseases, living in permanent fear. Where are the earthquakes coming from? Where are the lightning strikes coming from? Why is all this? What are these

diseases that hit us? We don't know about microbes, have no idea. That's to say nothing about the fights with neighboring tribes over women, over land, over meat, over subsistence. That the torture, the violence, the cruelty that goes on. Well, what would be the best way of intervening to try and redeem this rather bleak picture? What about having somebody tortured to death in an obscure part of the Middle East that ought to cure it.

Or if you're a Muslim, what about getting an illiterate, epileptic shepherd to start babbling and saying that he's been talking to an archangel. Or what about inventing the figure of Moses in the mountain that's never yet been found by any geographer? Mant Seiner, I agree very much with Christopher Hitchens. It is repudiation of many of the evils that he claims have been done in the name of God. But I've learned to distinguish between the greatness of God and the

inexcusable evil that has been done by those professing his name. And so I do not deduce that God is not great and that religion poisons everything. After all, if I fail to distinguish between the genius of Einstein and the abuse of his science to create weapons of mass destruction, I might be tempted to

say science is not great, and technology poisons everything. What is more, as I look back at the evils of atheist regimes of the twentieth century, I might also be tempted, ladies and gentlemen, to say atheism is not great. It has poisoned everything. As it is, I hold that science

shows some of the greatness of God. The famous physicist James tart Maxwell, who discovered electromagnetic theory, inscribed above the door in his laboratory in Cambridge University the words great are the works of the Lord's studied by all who delight in them. Yet Christopher Hitchin says, thanks to the telescope and the microscope,

religion no longer offers an explanation of anything. I find it impossible. I find it impossible as a scientist to take such a statement seriously, as if using a microscope and a Rembrandt painting could disprove the existence of Rembrandt himself. The idea that God and science are mutually exclusive explanations of the universe is as wrong as saying that internal combustion and Henry Ford are mutually exclusive explanations of the

automobile. They are complementary explanations. One explains how it works, the other why it exists. Far from science showing God is not great, as Christopher Hitchin suggests, the very opposite is the case. It was belief in God that motivated the advance of science in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Galileo, Copernicus, Kepler, Newton expected to find law in nature because they believed in a great law giver. Now so often we hear the new atheists talk about

faith and deprecating it. But I want to tell you that scientists are all people of faith, as Einstein saw. They believe that the universe is accessible to the human mind, and physics cannot explain that for the simple reason that you can't do physics without believing that the universe is intelligible. Science is important, but it has its limitations. It cannot answer the questions of a child, what are we here for? What is the meaning of life? Nor

can it tell us whether literature are is good or bad. Hence an atheism that insists that science is the only way the truth diminishes human beings. This is very obvious to many of my Russian friends. We thought we could abolish God and retain a value for human beings, but we found we couldn't do away with the greatness of God. Ladies and gentlemen, and you can do a way with the nobility of human beings endowed with all the potential of hearts

and minds made in God's image. God is not only the great creator, a judge. He's a God of grace and love. And the central claim of Christianity is this that, as an expression of his love, God himself became human, the word became flesh. Christ shows us as none other the greatness of God. He made unique claims to be the truth, to be the Son of God, and back them up by a life and teaching without parallel. But his moral teaching was not his main message. His stated mission

was to deal with a moral chasm that separates us humans from God. By taking our sins on himself. Ladies and gentlemen, we scientists cannot even tell you what energy is, so don't be surprised if I cannot completely explain to you the deepest mystery of our universe's history, the death and resurrection of Jesus.

Yet, just as we see the effect of and use energy without completely understanding it, what I do observe is the transformation, the peace, the hope that comes into the lives of ordinary men and women who learned to place their faith, their confidence, their trust in Christ as Savior in God. I see in them and experience in myself a transcendent sense of purpose that atheism

does not have, and a hope that atheism does not know. It is here, Ladies and gentlemen, I submit to you that the great of Gold is supremely manifest. Thank you. Yes, and we ran over a bit, but I wanted you to hear the end of the day. Frankly, I got the time code wrong on that it was longer than I thought, so I apologize for running over time. But we'll talk more about the conclusions of that at a later date. Thank you for joining us today. Let

me tell you the David Night Show. You can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else. You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at the Davidnightshow dot com. That's a website.