20Nov23 Osama bin Laden, CIA, ADL, FCC and UN Join to Takeover Internet

Using free speech to free minds. You are listening to the David Night Show. As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the twentieth of November. You're of our Lord twenty twenty three. Well, today we're going to begin with the what has happened with J six, the new footage that's been released, as well as the criticism of the way it was released and what is really behind this? What are we finding out about this? And now the

army is getting desperate. They want people to come back, Please come back, Please come back. We've got some shots set aside for you. After everything is all healed up, we'll take a look at the wars. We'll look at the not just the moral bankruptcy, but the financial bankruptcy of the Pentagon, having failed six audits in a row each year more than three trillion

dollars. Maybe they want to be on the lookout for some kind of cruise missile coming at the accounting office there and Javier Malay managed to get through and become the head of Argentina, the President of Argentina. What's going to happen next? We'll be right back. We'll also take a look at you know, Sama Bin laden the new hero. I think probably he's going to be

the new Cheguavara of the TikTok crowd as young kids. Absolutely amazing. Again, we'll take a look at it. One person said, well, regardless of what you think about happened at nine to eleven. You know, we have our big questions about nine to eleven, don't. We don't believe the official government narrative. But regardless of what you think about this, these kids

believe it, hook line and sinker. And even though they believe that he orchestrated the attack instead of CIA, even though they believe it, they still worship him. That's how incredibly dangerously stupid a lot of the younger generation is. But let's take a look first of this January the sixth stuff, and we had made available on Friday Mike Johnson, the new Speaker of the House. So they're going to make available forty thousand hours of security footage by at

the capitol there. It's going to be made public. Now, they've only released ninety hours of it so far, so it's only one quarter. It's like zero point two three percent, so it's one quarter of one percent of the total footage that is there. And yet what was macarthy going to do. Part of the reason that some of these people said they'd vote for him was that he would release this and give it to Tucker Carlson. Why give

it to Tucker Carlson? And a lot of people are saying this now, after they saw what Tucker Carlson and his producer did in terms of hiding information, Yeah, that's right, hiding information. After they saw the betrayal there by Tucker Carlson and his producer, they say, no, we want to have this put out completely. And the problem is a lot of people are concerned about the fact that they're taking the time to blur out people's faces.

Now, let people see what's going on. We need to see this, and we need to see it because the people who are being accused have already been publicly outed as part of the accusation. But we need to see the faces of the people who were acting as if they were members of the crowd when they were actually police officers. That needs to be shown. And so this blurring out the faces, what they're doing is they're actually hiding the faces

of agent provocators. There may not have been cops, it looks like it with the fist bumps and things like that that are now coming out, and so we need to know who these people were to prove that this was an inside job, as I said it was going to be anyway, individual video clips released to the media other requesters will have the faces of identifiable individuals blurred. Sod A Singer, Senior Congressional aid that restriction drew the immediate ire of

some defendants in January sixth, they have been publicly outed. Why can't we know the people who instigated this thing, provoked it, and so forth. Isn't that a crime? Is that a crime to do that? Well, if it isn't, it should be. So while we're significantly expanding the amount of clips it will be available and who can request them, we will be blurring faces with respect to individuals who are identifiable, Johnson wrote, to restore

America's trust and faith in their government, we must have transparency. Well, that would include blurred faces that we can't see. So there's that. I'm glad that he's moving forward with it. Of course, you know, Pelosi wanted to keep them hidden in secret and to you know, cherry pick what they were going to show to create a narrative. Everybody knew that was very dishonest, but it was also very dishonest what MacArthur and Tucker did it tell

us it's a great deal about them. My current estimates, there's roughly forty thousand hours that we will be making public over the next few months as quickly

as we can blurt out so you can't see faces. Beginning on November the twentieth, members of the public will be able to view footage on terminals in the Committee's office and Capitol Hill. In person viewing of the Congressional video terminals offers advantages over the online viewing room in person, so they've set this up online and you know they're going to be putting clips out there just you know,

I don't know if there's any order to them or not. The point is that if you go to their in person viewing room, then you kind of get a map and it shows you different cameras and so you can start to coordinate it, and so you can switch from camera to camera to follow an individual or something like that who has their face blurt out. So the in person system has maps for each level of the Capitol. The Capitol grounds

are separated into zones of the camera locations indicated by small icons. Viewers can access the entire database, whereas the online viewing room that's what they mean the website. The online viewing room will be stocked with tranches of footage on a rolling basis. So McCarthy said earlier this year that he would release it,

but that commitment never resulted in the public getting any direct access. They ran it through their controlled opposition, Tucker Carlson and his producer, who, by the way, has gotten so much criticism that he has essentially taken his Twitter account private. The viewing room set up and the plans to blurfaces on the

video clips drew fire from some on social media. Releasing batches of January sixth Close Circuit TV is merely a way for Congress to pretend that they're making the tapes public while holding back important footage that they will someday get back to us on a future batch, said Will Pope, who was a January sixth defendant. He said, they gave it all to the FBI. Americans deserve it all in one batch two. They gave it all to the FBI in January

twenty twenty one. This is what I said from the very beginning about Ed Snowden leak. It bothered me a great deal. It was very suspicious of what Glenn Greenwald was doing, releasing it here and there a little bit at a time. It just put it all out there. But you know, we saw this in spades of January the sixth. So Pope Is, who is a defendant, said, blurring the faces of those shown in the downloadable videos, will he rode public trust? He called the November seventeenth announcement Friday

a publicity stunt. Americans another trust blurred and edited January the sixth footage. Others ask, how can they be sure they haven't already been altered, or that footage hasn't been deleted by the Democrats in the Capitol police, the FBI. You know, the FBI has a history of deleting evidence, don't they.

You go back, you look at TWA eight hundred. We talked about that great deal with Jack Cashle and of course when it happened, there was ample testimony from people talking about how the FBI came in, confiscated footage, confiscated tapes of air traffic control. You know, people were getting ready to give to the media this is what they typically do, so have they deleted

a lot of footage with this stuff. During an online spaces meeting on x on Twitter, several of the more than eight hundred participants said they expect Google and YouTube to censor not only news about the January sixth video releases, but also any video clips that people try to upload to social media. Oh really, well, that'd be pretty big, pretty predictable, don't you think they do not understand why the online viewing room does not have a download function.

Well, you can still do screen capture. And by the way, you know, here's some as we're talking about this, here's one individual who is being escorted. He's evidently a rioter. He's dressed as a Trump supporter. So before then here they bending over. These guys take him into a room and they undo the handcuffs, and as soon as he gets his hand free, he does a fist bump to the other cop. Yeah there we go. It worked good. Yeah, I guess I can go out and do

this again. Yeah. And when you see the videos and the handshakes and the rest of this stuff, here's another Oh yeah, he's got well his face you can't see anyway because he's got a helmet on. When you look at these people prepare preparing shaking hands like a cop shaking hands, and people dressed as protesters and street clothes giving them fist bumps and all the rest of this stuff, because that is a preferred way to celebrate. So the question

is is people talk about this. You know, they've criticized Mike Johnson because he hasn't released all of it. I'm glad that he's releasing it. I think that was a good move. Frankly, they should criticize and ask for more to be done. I think it should not be blurred. I think they need to just put it out, just dump it, and the organization

can be done later to help people will go through it again. Sometimes when you look at this is not you know, what they're not doing is trying to say, well, we're holding it back and we're doing it a little bit at a time so we can organize it. As I've said before, when I've been involved in organizations trying to get information from the government, they would comply and they would give us a massive, unorganized dump where you can't

find anything. Well, the information is all there, go fish right, and you can put you know, to try to find the proverbial needle in that kind of a haystack is very difficult, so it is good to be able to have it. I'm glad that they're putting this in an online viewing room where you can go through and look at it, but blurring it is not a good idea, and they should put all of it out and let

people start to go through it themselves. There'll be some die hard people who'll make this their life work and they will get the truth out there if they were to do that. So that's unfortunate that they're not doing that, but it is good that he's doing more. And the question is, you know,

we know Pelosi was covering it up. Pelosi was, you know, cherry picking and editing the footage and McCarthy wouldn't release it except to Tucker, and they didn't release much and then Tucker hid some of what they released. That was a real misdirection. So hopefully this is a bit more genuine. But you know, what nobody is talking about is did Trump know all this stuff? Right? Did Trump know that all of this stuff happened under Trump?

But of course he's not responsible for this. He's not responsible for what happened on January the sixth. He's not responsible for the capital area, even though he's head of the government. Nothing that the government does to his supporters is her responsible for. Just like he wasn't responsible for the lockdowns. He wasn't responsible for the federal government policies that paid hospitals to kill people. He

wasn't responsible for the poisonous vaccine. Oh yes, he took credit for that, But he's not responsible, say his schizophrenic supporters, even though he bragged about that, Even though he took credit for it, even though he took credit for the lockdown, he's not responsible. Fact, she's not responsible either. Other people did it, not them, and we'll never hold him responsible. Trump can tell everybody send me money. He took in two hundred and

fifty million dollars a quarter of a billion dollars. He fleeced his supporters for said, go to Washington January. He gets up there, makes a speech, meet me at the Capitol. He disappeared. Alex Jones, who fired me for telling people this was a grift? Who fired me for telling people don't show up? Who fired me because I told that? Sorry, sob don't come on my show and push those lies to people, and I did it in front of my crew. That line, grifter, Why did people

send Alex Jones money? He wasn't even supposedly hiring any lawyer. Supposedly Trump was going to hire lawyers, but he didn't. So what was going on with all this stuff? The first I saw of January sixth was I got Twitter notifications people saying exactly what you said was going to happen happened because I said it that morning. I said it right after Steve Patinnick started lying two days after the election. I talked about it, and I talked about it

for about a month and a half. I got fired. I continue to talk about it because I continued on air, and I talked about it the morning of January sixth, I said, don't go. It's going to be loaded with agent provocateurs. This whole thing is a setup. The whole thing is a setup. Here we are nearly three years later, and people see this as a setup. Can they see who set them up? Trump and

Alex Jones and the rest of these stop the steal and save America. Grifters out there their biggest crime, their biggest crime was what they did to their supporters, people who have committed suicide, people who are rotting in jail after they fleece them of money. Absolutely reprehensible. The insurrection stuff, as far as you know, the Democrats, it was all made up. There was no insurrection, and there's plenty of evidence in this stuff. As we're talking

about this, we take a look at these people. Take a look this shooting into the crowd, and of course has been and now that's a paintball gun, right, except that you know, when they're shooting this, it's got enough force that you'll see, you know, the crowd is standing there, they're not attacking anybody, and the cops start shooting into the crowd there. And as I've said before, look at that that was a non lethal thing, went through the guy's cheek, went through his cheek, so called

non lethal thing. Blood all over the place, being shot at close range with these you know, I don't know if it's pepper spray or if it's just paintball gun, whatever it was, rubber bullets, I think it was that they were shooting. And as this footage goes on, this is some of the footage from the police cameras showing that they're firing into the crowds. And I've said over and over again, look at the difference in the Tennessee

insurrection led by the Tennessee Three against the State House. And you got this mob that shoves its way in, the mob that gets its hands on the state legislators here in Tennessee, starts shoving them around. What did the state police in Tennessee do. Well, they didn't fire, They didn't put on

body armor and fire into the crowd. No. What they did was they were just wearing their state Patrol uniforms and they used their bodies to try to put themselves between They didn't push back on anybody, even right turn their backs. These protesters just use their bodies as a shield to try to shield the legislators who were trying to get to the floor. And they were shoving the legislators, they were shoving the State Highway Patrol. That's the way it should

have been done. These cops and DC were the provocateurs. You had hidden provocateurs, and you had provocateurs in uniform shooting into the crowd, throwing tear gas into the crowd. And these people were led into this by these judas goats like Trump and Alex Jones and what they do. They get you focused on ray Epps. I don't care if ray Epps which side he was on.

He didn't do a tiny fraction of what Trump and Alex Jones and Ali Alexander and Roger Stone, the rest of these people, all of them making money off of this, off of their own supporters, what backstabbers, what judas goats to lead them into this stuff. So yeah, meet me at the capitol. Yeah, this will not stand. We will not let him take office at Alex. Well, here's one of the victims here. This guy's name is Matthew, Matthew Perna And as you look here he's in the

red T shirt. Look at this peacefully walking through. They're being escorted by the police. Come on in, everything is fine, you know, just as you've got some people who are in their pastor a couple of pastors in their seventies had to go to the restaurant. Police say come on in, come on in. It's right around there. Now they're looking at several years in jail, which is essentially a life senate. So there's Matthew right there. They didn't blur his face out, and so he Initially, he was

just walking calmly there. He pled guilty to the initial charges, believing that he would face six to twelve months in prison for that. That's an outrage, just to walk through there when the police are standing there, not telling you you can't come in, not opposing you, just to walk through six to twelve months. Only after he pled guilty did the Department of Justice, Yeah, inform Matthew that they would seek a terrorism enhancement to his sentencing,

which would raise his sentence to a potential nine years in prison. Four days after getting the news that they would push for this terrorism enhancement, Matthew went into his garage, put a rope around his neck and hung himself. Yeah, how do you feel about that, Alex, Get that on your conscience. These people you betrayed. Yeah, it doesn't excuse the Department of Justice. They're criminals for doing that. The Department of true criminals, the FBI,

and the DOJ. These people politicized tyrants, and you delivered them into the hands. You didn't know that would happen. You didn't know that would happen. Many Tucker Carlson's could show the world, but he won't. And that was that shooting video that Ari showed you. His producer Greg underscore Ra and his team at Fox were given all of this last year. That shooting footage. By the way, that was back in September. I had not

seen that. I don't spend much time on social media. It's just now getting coverage from a lot of media because of the release of this other footage. But that was not just recently released. That was there. I got

no coverage whatsoever. JA six protesters fired upon with no warning the US Capitol Police Chief Waldo, Where's Waldo lied saying that he gave warnings that you can see from the footage that they didn't did not give warnings, And so new footage So the Capitol police may have incited the riot by firing muitial munitions into a peaceful crowd. They may have entrapped people by saying, oh, you want need to use the rest of them coming in he was in the Capitol,

sent him to jail for five or six years. Each new piece of footage only confirms what Americans already understood. Many many a lot of them believe the Weaponized Line Committee that the few scant minutes available video recycled by the media

paint a false picture of what happened. The latest footage shows capitol police inviting protesters into the building as a peacefully assembled in the corridor, the same people who would later be prosecuted and labeled as insurrectionists, such as Matthew and so the police firing rubber bullets, tear gas grenades, stun grenades under the crowd peaceful protesters before anybody tried to enter the Capitol building, possibly triggering the violence.

Again, compare that to what the police officers did the state police at the Tennessee Capitol taking the de escalating the situation down because you know, we don't want to have any leftists be charged with insurrection or violence or have to go to prison or anything like that. Right, No, it was all set up on the way they handled it. To the people who led them in, the Judas Coats, it's easy to control the narrative when you have

all the evidence under lock and key. So we're Cheney and Kinsinger and the rest of these people doing well. They got a lot of criticism as more footage came out. Some of the criticism was coming from Senator Mike Lee. He said, why didn't Liz Cheney and Adam Kinsinger ever refer to any of them these tapes. Maybe they never looked for them, Maybe they never even questioned their own narrative. Maybe they were just too busy selectively leaking the text

messages of Republicans that they wanted to defeat. Well, it was more than that they have. This is all partisan political warfare. It is political persecution, and they're using it for political purposes. Just take a look at this back and forth between Corey Bush on the progressive left and Mike Johnson. We're not here today to consider real solutions that will make people's lives better. We're here as a distraction from the sad truth that dangerous MAGA Republican policies make us

less safe. They deprive us of basic investments that would move us closer to a genuine community safety. And at the end of the day, Republicans refuse to consider those investments because Republicans are not seeking solutions to the problem. Gen ladies time, they are the problem. Thank you. When I yield back, only the's times is bribed. The genial lad yells back speak. I want to welcome miss Bush to the committee. Did she leave already? Oh?

She left already. She's still here. She makes fortunate. I was going to point out to her a couple of ironies. She came to lecture us. She was here for five minutes and three seconds. I appreciate her time investment. She came to lecture us about quote avoiding responsibility. We've had four full committee markups. She has not attended three of the four. I'm not sure today her five minutes councils and attendance, but let's say she's she's

made two of them now. I was going to ask her if she's still in favor of defunding the police, because we have her on record more times than I can count of having been the great champion of that. She wanted to talk about responsible investments that will make a difference. I wanted to ask

her how that defunding police thing worked out. I think everybody in the country knows that we're facing chaos and a catastrophe of crime, violent crime, and all the major cities that she went and protested in and many more that took the CUE. I wanted to ask her about the reality of how that works out in real life. She accuses us of engaging in talking points. We're trying to pass meaningful legislation to solve these problems, and she is advancing policies

and ideas that create the mayhem. So wow, it's so unfortunate that she's not here to engage in a colloquy on that. But I'm not surprised. This is what we get from the radical left. She is part of that radical left that is bringing down the party and having them associated with the crime

crisis that we have on the streets. This is the very reason that we need Police Week to reinforce our support for the brave men and women who are on the front lines, that thin blue line, put their lives on the line every single day, and we lose them now at alarming rates in the line of duty, trying to protect their communities from wacko, crazy, maddening policies like the one that Miss Bush has supported in Congress. I will also point out she, as we noted earlier, she was the vice chair of

the Crime Subcommittee of Judiciary and she doesn't believe in funding police. What a tragedy that she's not here to join us. Yeah, she makes her a little speech and runs away, And that's exactly what this is about. However, you know, we talk about defunding the police, just just look at the big picture. You've got the radical left, and you've got George Sorows

removing police from protecting communities and creating chaos, the Soros chaos everywhere. Well, on the other hand, you have the federal government that is engaged in a police state persecution, political police state persecution. I absolutely agree with what he had to say about this defund the police and the communities and Soros district attorneys and the progressive left. But the ball is now in his court and what he needs to do is he needs to do something about the police.

They're at the capitol. Something needs to be done about that. You've got to have some people fired, publicly humiliated, have their pensions taken away. At the very least, if you don't put them in jail and let the j sixers out, don't blur their faces, show their faces, make examples of them. If you don't reform. Look, every institution, every institution is going to have good and bad people in it. And as Frank Serpico said, when it comes to the police especially, but it's any institution,

you have to purge the bad actors. Out. If you don't, the institution becomes bad. Well that should have been done decades ago with the Capitol Police and the FBI, and they've become bad institutions. And the question is what are you going to do? You're going to continue to fund them and do business as usual. Are you going to actually reform this mess? That's the real key. So you know, there was again back and forth with

Mike. Lee also called for an investigation in the committee itself. Exactly, you know these people running this McCarthyite hearing who have even if these people have their convictions overturned or pardoned or whatever, they still spent years in jail under very harsh circumstances. And so I think that Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, these Democrats that they worked with, they need to be given a taste of

that medicine. I think they need to be investigated. I think they need to go to jail because they were the ones who unjustly jailed so many people and escalated these charges so much that many people, several people committed suicide. Lee called the investigation of Sham. He said the crucial information about the committee's work could have been deliberately lost were destroyed. He cast doubts on the committee's

transparency and its objectivity. It is McCarthyism, and that kind of McCarthyism just continued under Kevin McCarthy, didn't it. The FBI lost count of how many paid informants were a capital at the Capitol in January the sixth, and later performed an audit to figure out the exact number. According to the New York Post, Well again, I think by now we all know what's going on, and it just becomes more of an irritant, more perhaps of a deliberate

provocation for this to continue to go on. And I think Mike Johnson's made an appropriate step. I think he needs to step it up. They need to dump everything unedited, unblurred. So Jordan has a poena the Bank of America because it is a very wide net that was involved in capturing people.

Again, Bank of America, as we've talked about in the past, they went through their data and they gave jail location, you know, stuff that they went through and they gave all the charges that were done on Bank of America credit cards within a couple of days, and that large vicinity there of the Capitol and surrounding areas into Virginia and Maryland. They sent if you used a credit card there, Bank of America tried to get you in jail.

Think about that, if you deal with Bank of America. What criminals they are? What absolute criminals. Bank of America. The FBI didn't even ask for it, they did it. And then they went through and they also gave them anyone who had used the Bank of America credit card to purchase a gun, anyone anywhere, anytime. This is not just January the sixth in that area, anyone anywhere, anytime you use a credit card to buy a gun. Bank of America. I said to the FBI, here, do

something with this too. What a bunch of criminals. And so now they have subpoena them. Now we've known all of this stuff. So what is new about this? Well, Jim Jordan has subpoenaed them for records that would be internal communications, in other words, what was said back and forth between Bank of America officials within the bank and then what was said between them and any communications that they would have with the FBI. Now that will be interesting

to know, but we're not going to find out anything about that. For another six, well seven months. They've got till June the eighth to comply with that, so it's going to be a while before we get that data, but that will be interesting to see. Bank of America told the Judiciary Committee that its conduct was quote within a legal process initiated by the US Department of the Treasury un quote November sixteenth letter to Bank of America CEO Brian moynihan

informing him of the subpoena. Mister Jordan, who also chairs the Weaponized Select Subcommittee, wrote that quote, it is unclear what legal process permits the FBI or the Bank of America to share sensitive customer information of potentially thousands of BOA customers and to implicate them in federal law enforcement investigation without any clear criminal nexus. Yeah, what is it that allows them to do that? Again, it amounts to a violation of privacy. It also amounts to Bank of America

trying to get you in jail. I mean, just look at what's happened to so many of these people. Sam Montoya, who was the only Info Wars person acting as a real journalist that day, goes in and shot footage and he narrowly escaped jail, but it was a real ordeal financially for him. Of course, he was fired by Alex in the midst of all of that, and because he doesn't want to be connected with any of that stuff. The only person who actually did any reporting at Info wars arrest. The

people were instigating this and then trapping people. But Sam went in an honestly shot video of it and he gets in trouble. Just amazing. Before we go to break some of the comments people have Georgia Boy eleven forty two, could we please see all the footage from the Venegon on nine to eleven, two thousand and one. Yeah, wouldn't that be interesting? Yeah, maybe

they could also do that. You know, we never had any We had promises that were broken by Trump that he was going to show release some nine to eleven information and all this other kind of stuff in JFK assassinated and things like. None of that happened. But it didn't even talk about releasing the

footage from the Pentagon around nine to eleven. As a matter of fact, we know they went around confiscating outside surveillance cameras to get the footage from that, and of course the Pentagon it's covered even at that time was covered with a surveillance footage and so yeah, they don't want that scene, Jay Caravella, why don't Why does Nancy release Paul's footage from her living room? Yeah, Jason Barker says, ha ha, blurring faces as they rush in public,

facial recognition for things like airports and everywhere else. That's right. Yeah, this is a government that demands to know everything about you, but keeps everything about what it does hidden from us. Let's talk about transparency. I mean, that's where we are today. We got a long way to go. Releasing ninety hours of this stuff and then blurring faces on what's coming out that is not uh, that is that is such a minor move towards transparency.

It is almost laugh it's laughable. But it's also almost cynical to do something like that. Guard Goldsmith, I still wonder how much they gave to Carlson. Yeah exactly. Well, you know, his his producer was stonewalling on it. But good to see their guard and Jason Teta ninety seven four oh one. They were dumb enough to think they were part of the plan. Now they know they're expendable. That's right, that's right. How much, says d G eight, is Trump giving to the victims and the families

of the j six. Lie. Yeah, wouldn't give them the time of day. Didn't want to talk about it for several months. He was worried about what's going to happen. And again he's somebody who is as we could see with the pardons for the January the six people, and his defense of these people who came to his defense, we can see that, as his former lawyer said, he is incapable of acting except out of his own perceived interest or as we now see in this campaign, out of revenge Michael de

Silvia, everyone will think twice about peacefully protesting from now on. That's a big part of it. Unless you know you're the left. Now, as we talked about this on Friday, you know you had, you know, these protesters. You showed up at the DNC video footage of some of them pounding on it. Yona the listener said, well, that was taken out of context. The cops incited this. They attack people. I can easily

believe that's the case. They The reason that I talked about that to agin with is because the left has typically gotten a pass on any of the stuff.

No matter what they do, even if it's riots where they're torturing a neighborhood that's mostly peaceful, they'll tell us as they stand in front fire, the mainstream media will And so now what you're seeing is and we've always said this, look right now, they're using these useful idiots on the left to help them to take away our free speech, to take away so many things. But it'll all be used against them. And perhaps that was what happened

with that group's protesting the DNC. Yeah, perhaps we and we have seen that in the past with them, but typically is not the case. Perhaps it'll be more and more the case now that they will use these same tactics they've been using against people on conservatives that we now use this on the progressive left. And so anyway, I let me finish a couple more of these

comments before we take a break. At KWD sixty eight, all the focus on reps, there were hundreds of instigators there besides the police and Stasi. Exactly right, exactly right. But you see that's the way that these people operate. That's a very effective propaganda tool for Darren Beattie, who started all

that at Revolver and then got on with Tucker Carlson. Right. That's why I say Tucker Carlson again by using Ray Epps to distract attention away from Trump, from himself, from Alex Jones, other people who were pushing everybody to go to this thing, right, Well, we got a scapegoat out here, and so you personalize it because you know, if you start saying, well, there was just one hundred inns agoin now, you have to have some face, some face, And that's the purpose that reps serve for them.

Whether or not he is an agent provocateur, I really don't care at this point. There are hundreds of them. The question is why the focus on this one guy, because he couldn't have possibly kicked off this whole thing by himself. So what are they distracting you from? You see Darre Immediate Revolver, Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, all these people on the right, reps, reps, reps, reps. So what is it that they're using him as a red herring for to throw you off the trail? What is

it that they don't want you to see? They don't want you to see what they did because they're the instigators. They're the agent provocateurs, they're the backstabbing betrayers of their own people who continue to follow them. It's amazing to me, amazing, Guard Goldsmith. I don't understand how the current speaker can claim it's a release of all the footage if that already happened when it wasn't given to Fox. Unless it wasn't all of it, then yeah, I

don't think that it was. I don't think that he gave everything to Tucker, but I think he gave more than Tucker released. I don't know. I don't know. We'll have to see. But again, what he's saying is he's going to release forty thousand hours. He's released ninety hours, and

they're going to blur things out. That's the real issue. And I think that he released a lot more than Tucker actually put out there because people were complaining, Yeah, there was a certain quantity that was said, and I think it would They said it was as large a quantity as McCarthy released to Tucker. The question is why would it be released to Talker. See everybody

complained about that at the time. Everybody said, yeah, but can we trust Tucker to show the stuff and then they believe that he did not show a lot of stuff. We don't need to have this stuff filtered. We don't need to have it blurred. We need to have it dumped for everybody to see. That's transparency. Sending stuff to Democrats who are going to edit it, sending stuff to Republicans who are going to edit it, maybe not release all of it, and then blurring it out is not transparency. There

needs to be transparency. Too. Many people's lives have already been ruined with this KWD sixty eight. The use of cash is getting harsh enough that people will welcome CBDC. Some places are not accepting. Banks are questioning deposits and withdrawals. Yeah, they're gradually pulling the net in, aren't they. So what will happen is we usually see with this stuff, we'll go through a gradual process of pushing people, nudging people psychologically. Well, it's easier if

you do this, and then of course they do make it. It is easier to use plastic than it is to use cash. For the longest time, there's the guy Dave Ramsey. Okay, tell everybody get out of debt. Don't have credit card debt, Get rid of credit cards and all the rest of it. And I remember him having on a physician. He said, look, I've got you know, I'm not struggling financially, But he says, I force myself not to use a credit card. Even when I'm

getting gas. I'll make myself walk in and give them the cash and then fill it up and go back and get the change and all the rest of the stuff, because I just don't want to use a credit card. I absolutely refuse to use it. Well, most people will go for the convenience of just, you know, at least using your gas card to pay for it, so you don't have to walk in. Remember when they used to come to your car and fill it up for you and check your will and

clean your windshield and make the change. I'm old enough to remember that. Now it's the incoming. Well, I don't want to have to walk in after I do everything for myself, or at the pump. I don't want to have to walk in there and get the change as well and all the rest of this stuff. So they make it easy for you, They nudge you along with a comfort and ease, and then those of us who don't want to do that at some point in time they drop the hammer and just

ban it. You know, most people get the Brave New World treatment, and for those people who don't want to go Brave New World, you get the nineteen eighty four or wellly in treatment. Jason Barker, thank you very much for the tip, he says. I pray that all have a safe and happy Thanksgiving this week. With all the chasts in this world, we need to remember to be thankful for what God has given us. Absolutely true, and you know we all have been given so much, and many of

us don't even realize what God has given us. We should be able to see it in the land that we live in. The founders who fought to set this up saw God's providence and his blessing, and they gave him credit for it. But we have become a generation that does not recognize what God has given us and given us in our own homes and our own families. I know everybody has struggles that they go with and some people are going through some horrific stuff. But even with a death of loved ones, try to

think of it as the fact that you had them for a while. That was a gift from God, that you enjoyed for a while, and it doesn't have to end with this life if we have a relationship with God and that begins with thanksgiving for what He's given us. Audi, Mr. Arth and Modern Retro Radio. Thank you very much. Just wishing everyone a good week. Modern Retro Radio. Yes, we'll be doing rebroadcasts on Thursday and Friday, and we'll have something of some Thanksgiving stuff that do every Thanksgiving.

We also have on Wednesday. I'm excited to talk to David Stockton. Many people, younger people may not remember him. He's still been very active. He's just written a book. But he was there in the Reagan administration as the deficit was exploding. He was director of OMB and he actually pushed back against Reagan on that and he's got a lot to say. As a matter of fact, I've got an article here from him today talking about how we're

going to spend all this money for all these wars. We don't have a single penny of the hundreds of billions of dollars that we want to send. People are totally in debt. Jason Parker says they're working on making the unbankable be bankable. It's one of the signs of incoming cbdc's The fifty and five plan is to do the same with countries that are not ready for the system.

That's right. The fifty and five plan is their idea that by I think the date was twenty twenty five, if I'm correct, but fifty fifty states signed onto this digital and optagon on everybody. Grammy for God, says Mike Johnson, the Christian who killed a bill to stop abortions. They're all frauds KWD sixty eight. Yes they are, Grammy. The upright people character in Congress could be evacuated in a smart car, assuming that the battery was

charged. They may have some gasoline versions, so I don't know. Well, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. If you like the Eagles on the cars, Heuey Lewis and the news, they say the hard you'll love the classic hits channel at APS Radio, download our app, or listen now at APS radio dot com. When I was my stern down booker, I thought without a doubt that I was through with all my parents' trivet, that I was there a mes after months of tough civilian

life. But gee, I wish I was back in the army. The Army wasn't really bad at all. Three meals a day, three for which you didn't pay you and the moms or winners bring them all. There's a lot to be said for the army and life without responsibility. A soldier out of luck was re stock. There's over something one higher up where you can pass the buck policy. I wish I was night to be well, just

in time for Christmas. I guess we've got a new recruitment film for the military, because now they're begging the unvaccinated soldiers to return the ones that they kicked out. And of course there's somebody higher up that they're not passing the buck to. Instead, they're passing these people that were higher up that instituted this relentless policy of vaccinating every last person with an experimental drug and again playing

these games. Well, you know, cormonati, but it's you know, it's approved, it's not approved, and you know, but we're going to do this so that we don't have any legal responsibility all that stuff. We're going to say that Coromanati is approved, but it's legally distinctive, I said. Pfizer said the FDA. It's legally they're identical, but it's legally distinctive,

but we're going to legally require you to get it. And so with all of that, they've you know, promoted the people who kicked everybody out, and now they've got a big shortfall, and it really is big. Quite frankly, a lot of people. The US Army is now begging the unvaccinated soldiers that they kicked out who underwent in voluntary discharge for refusing to take the vaccine, begging them to return to service and permitting them to correct their

military records. Well that's good that they're going to let them correct their records because a lot of these people were given dishonorable discharges because they were really vicious about this stuff. Just two years ago, in a shameful campaign, the Pentagon was gleefully discharging soldiers who refused to take COVID vaccines. Says the Zero Hedge article, one individual has put up the letter that he got and the woman in charge now the army hope hope, rampy, hope springs eternal.

I guess a lot of people hope that the Army has changed, but it hasn't. And so he underscored some things. Former soldiers who were involuntarily separated for refusal to receive the COVID nineteen vaccine may request a correction of their military records. Individuals who desire to apply to return to service should contact us go to your nearest recruitment office. Yeah, you know they're getting serious. The memes show when they go from promoting trainees and their DEI stuff to showing hardcore

males and their recruitment stuff. You know that the war is coming, right, the war's coming, and they've got all these these DEI generals in charge of it, and they can't get anybody to sign up. So, yeah, you want to sign up. To be elaborate, you want to sign up to go to a foreign war while our border is being crashed and invaded all the time. Yeah yeah, that government, that government wants you.

Uncle Sugar wants you, doesn't he We were assured that these discharges would not affect military readiness at the time, The Marine Corps Lieutenant General David Adding said to lawmakers in Congress, I can tell you there are no operational impacts across the force for readiness. There's not one community that has signaled an instance where a leader, an NCO or another enlisted Marine is not present. Because of that vaccine thing, they kicked out more people than anybody else. Supposedly that

number is one nine hundred and sixty eight kicked out of the Marines. Twenty percent of those got an honorable discharge. That means that eighty percent didn't didn't And so that's when you look at that. Now, kicked out about two thousand people and only four four hundred or so got an honorable discharge. Now the Marines are looking for a few good men to use as cannon fodder and whatever the next war that they want to get us involved in. The readiness

suffered. Thousands of service members were dismissed. Potential recruits then declined to enlist in the armed services. More than seventeen thousand service members bulked at taking the shots, citing safety fears linked to the vaccines. Speedy development spurred by misinformation about messenger RNA technology, as well as concern over fetal cell lines used in

the formulation and testing. The more the controversy raging the news, and more troops asked to skip the shots, said the Military Times, And they're reporting, and so you got people like Jason Barker, who even though they had seventeen thousand people they say, who refuse to get it, they kicked out about a little more than half of that, well, well less than half

of that three hundred and thirty nine they said. Okay, so they were kicked out, and if the Marines are any indication, eighty percent of them got dishonorable discharges. Others. You know, Jason was able to hang in there and retire, and I'm glad that he was, but he was not going to take this stuff. And his letter that he wrote was very thoughtful, very complete. A lot of people used it as a template, an idea for what they could do to write about their religious exemption, nurses and

other people. I remember we put it up and many people used that letter. And so, you know, the eight three hundred and thirty nine people that they kicked out is way more than were killed in Afghanistan. They had twy four hundred and two soldiers killed in Afghanistan over twenty years. So they kicked out, you know, nearly four times that many. And I wonder, you know how many are slowly dying now? How many have they crippled and injured? Kind I think of this as kind of the roadside bomb of

the Pentagon against its own troops. Who I look at it. You got a lot of people wounded, long term, poisoned, stabbed in the back by the people that they had signed up to protect this country. But of course the Pentagon is not about protecting this country. It's about everything but protecting this country. Not only do they not protect the borders, but they get us involved in foreign wars that get us put targets on our back everywhere.

They're putting targets on our back, not to mention the money and the blood that they're spending. Lieutenant Colonel Terry Kelly, a spokesperson for the army, so that twenty seven hundred and sixty seven soldiers have received General Officer written reprimand. So this is you know, twenty eight hundred or so that stayed in and they're getting reprimands. Yeah, to pull that picture up, that's the clownish look at that Darth Vader reviews the troops. I mean that picture just

they've seen it before. It's just you know, a thousand words right there in that one picture. You want to sign up for that joke of an army. What a joke this is. There's one great, big, traveling stomach sucking up all of the money that it can. They can't even button his jacket there. As a result, the military is missing its recruitment goals by twenty five percent. So they kicked out eight thousand people and they're missing

fifteen thousand soldiers. They kicked out people who were trained, they kicked out people who had great records, and now they're looking for fifteen thousand soldiers and it's your shortfall. And a lot of people say, well, I don't really want to join a clown show like that. You look at all the woke garbage and rest of this stuff. I'm sorry, it says this person who wrote this article on zero Hedge. I'm sorry about the destroyed careers of

the best service members. And they are the best because not only they stood by their principles, that's the cream of the crop that they kicked out. Really, they kept their health. They'll get military discharge papers corrected, but they'll always remember the unfairness, the trauma of the helplessness that they felt as their commanders dismissed them for not taking experimental vaccines that we subsequently saw it did not work, unsafe and effective. The soldiers have not been compensated, but

they at least remained healthy and stayed true to their principles. Please appreciate how hard it was for those brave souls to stick to their principles, their entire lives and careers being wrecked by this illegal COVID order. These are courageous people. The military needs stoic, strong heroes, of which three and thirty one were dismissed due to the insane orders of the Biden administration, and many more took early retirement. So I think we ought to have a special Veterans Day

to honor the people of the vaccine wars. Not a foreign war, but it was a war that was brought onto us by foreign power, by the UN, by the World Economic Forum, by billionaires. You people who fought this, and whatever profession you're in, are veterans at the beginning of the art elect war, the artificial intelligence war, the war of the technocratic elite against us. So the army is trying to get back the soldiers that it kicked out. And when we look at this in retrospect, it truly is

amazing how they have just trashed these people. Recently retired Army Major Chase Spear suggested in a Peace on the American Mind that the recent measures were tied to the Army's abysmal recruiting numbers. He said, one might be curious why of the Armies doing it about face on this right now, given that its top official clearly has a different perspective from the policy change that she is authorizing. Last month, the Army missed its fiscal year twenty twenty two recruiting goals by

ten thousand. Spear has discussed the persecution that soldiers who did not wish to receive the vaccine faced from overzealced commanders eager to implement the mandate from Biden. He wrote, the Army requires several immunizations and checkups throughout the year to maintain one's medical readiness. Not one of those came with a coersive force of the COVID mandate. Were you laid on your flu shot, well, you just get told to take one at your next convenience late on a vision check.

Same thing applies. But in twenty twenty one on Fort Levenworth, proof of the COVID shot was the only path to being able to live in existence that in any way might reflect normal. It became the primary marker of human worth on that base and at many others. Under the management of Major General Douglas Simms, some base facilities against is Fort Levenworth were set aside only for the vaccinated. I traveled to Fort Riley for a war fighter exercise in late twenty

twenty one. First Infantry Division policy limited unvaccinated visitors to hotel rooms and workplaces. It also restricted access to base morale facilities and the commissary, such as the base grocery store. It limited to those who had a vaccine card. Friends of mine on Fort Bragg, which is now called Fort Liberty, because you know, we can't talk about a Confederate soldier told me of similar policies at their location. A two class system among military service members was established across

much of the base, hearkening back to Biblical language. You were clean or unclean based on your shot status. That's right, you get set outside the camp like a leper. Major General sims performance, however, was rewarded. You say, oh, it's always somebody higher up to pass the buck. No, you pass these people higher up. That's what happened. He has since been promoted to lieutenant general. He's currently the director of Operations for Joint

Staff. Would he treat an unvaccinated officer who re enters the army with respect in the days to come, or would such a uniformed citizen still be worthy of segregation? Have they changed? No, No, of course they haven't. They've rewarded the people who did this, same people still there that the leaders who pushed this through there other army leaders punished unvaccinated soldiers and were rewarded

and said retired as spears. So he said, a force that can so easily lose sight of its purpose is one that is rightly viewed through a skeptic's lens. So what is the purpose of the military? I mean, you know foreign wars? Do you even want a military that is competent and capable in order to fight your foreign wars? Because we know that you're not about defending America our borders. So what is the purpose of this. We've got

an expeditionary empire and they can't even do that competently. By the way, when we look at the vaccines themselves, like I said, how many people has the Pentagon killed of its own soldiers slow killed. And of course this is something's always been there, whether you're talking about depleted uranium or other things. They constantly expose their soldiers to health risks and they don't care about it. Ninety four percent of COVID nineteen deaths over the past year were among quadruple

vaccinated and triple vaccinated. This is coming out of the UK. The Office for National Statistics in England has just released some new data, an update on deaths by vaccination status, and this is you know, we've already had a lot of this released. We saw the big spike that happened in September and on of twenty twenty one. Now this is for the twelve months between June

twenty twenty two and the thirty first of May twenty twenty three. They said ninety five percent of those COVID deaths people who died with COVID or from COVID. Ninety five percent of those were people who had been vaccinated, and ninety four percent of those deaths were among the people who were triple or quadruple vaccinated.

So the question is how many of when the military is requiring people to get the jabs, did it just stop at the first one or the second one, or did you have to get booster after booster after booster after booster. Yeah, they're going to have a big problem moving forward. It is going to be very, very big because they're going to start seeing all kinds. And of course, this is the military, who has their own d MED database that you had several officers. Medical officers said, look at this.

We have all these different things that have gone up by several hundred percent, several of them by thousands of percent increase, and these medical issues that are gone up, life threatening medical issues compared to our own database. Because they want to keep a very detailed record that's not like not like the vyar's database from CDC where people voluntarily call stuff they're not required to. As a matter of fact, they're discouraged from doing it. A previous study back in

twenty ten, they paid Harvard to look at it. Harvard said only about one percent of the adverse events from vaccines are actually sent in. It's a time consuming to do it. They're discouraged from doing They were heavily discouraged from doing it with COVID. But when you look at the military's database, they need to have as a part of readiness, they need to know if something is going around, is it a chemical attack, is it a biological attack?

And so they keep very detailed records of everything, and so these records showed what was happening. And so then the Pentagon went back and said, well, last five years that you're comparing this to that was all wrong, and so we're going to get rid of that obvious lies. How much more

obvious could they be? The unvaccinated account for at least for the least amount of COVID nineteen deaths, and every single month up to May twenty twenty three, barely even getting into and that's when the data stopped getting into triple figures in most months, whereas the vaccinated population accounted for the majority of COVID nineteen deaths every single month, hitting four figures in all but two months throughout that year. Yeah, this is what we're talking about. And so the last

thing is why are German politicians so eager to vaccinate children? Why are they lying about it now? Ask eugipiis why were they so eager in the summer of twenty twenty one to vaccinate children? Why would they place public pressure on vaccine regulators to recommend child vaccination because we were told, well, it doesn't affect children. And by the way, that was a big red flag right

there, telling you this wasn't any kind of a pandemic. It was what they were doing, was they were hastening along the actuarial table of our death by age and by the hospital protocols that they were doing and they weren't even trying to make a case that it was affecting children. But now you've got children who have to have a heart test before they can participate in any athletics at schools. They believed, or professed to believe that a vaccination rate and

excess of some magic number within the pandemic. Remember that all that heard immunity, Well what is it, doctor Faunci, mister science, what is that number? Well, I don't know, you know, it could be this, it could be that. I don't know it just yeah, they and they keeps changing it, right, so he says. Eugipia says, I'd still say that maybe they didn't know where they were doing. But a recent news story has caused me to consider this question more deeply. Where did the

specific pressure come from? What drove for example, random regional ministers in Germany, ministers of education to mount their own appeals to vaccinate school children. What did these dumb people ever know about viruses or reproduction numbers or population immunity? What was going on? Well, of course these are all rhetorical questions. We know this is political, we know it was psychological, and we know it was mass murder, and it's continuing. The people who did it are

continuing in effect. Doug Log, thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that it's on Rockfinn Audi modern retro radio. Those kicked out soldiers would have to be crazy to reenlist. That's right, Jason Barker. I'm waiting for a recall Audi. Before they do a draft, they will recall all of the ir R guys and retired that are not broken. Yeah, you're right, I'll recall you, he says. There are also a lot

of soldiers that have died suddenly. Yeah, died from suddenly. Brian and Deb McCartney, our son in law, is glad that he is out of the army. Yes, yes, j Caravella. What's wrong? Doesn't this younger generation want to enlist to be cannon fodder? In Ukraine, Israel, any other of our many foreign entanglements. Jason says, that just shows you these people don't support these wars. Yeah, it's all media propaganda. Remember

after nine eleven people flocked to come into the military. They lacked the same conviction now, says All. Yeah, a lot of people believed it, a lot of people believed it, sincerely believed it. And I think that's another part of it too. You know, quite frankly, as I've said over and over again, the twenty twenty stuff that Trump pulled and Biden pulled after him continued, that's just the other shoe to drop from nine to eleven. They were born at the same time. As a matter of fact,

Dark Winter two months before nine eleven. Let's see Brian dub McCartney, our son in law, was made to put on high heels when he was in I've seen pictures of that. I've not hurt anybody say that. It made them walk around in red shoes and just pathetic. Audi. Mr. We're looking for a few good non gender specific pronouns. That's what they're looking for. It's a game. It's a game. Yeah, they're still experimenting on people's minds, even if they're backed off a little bit. The experimenting on

the bodies. Brian Devincartney, who was a recruiter in the end and hated every minute of it. They've forced thousands to be recruiters. Now. Trump Burger forever says no vaccines, but they didn't say anything about not making you wear high heels. Nathan Bedford, for is eighteen sixty five. Most of those that left because the JAB were white Christians. They should not go back because the deck is stacked against them and they will be used as cannon fodder

for the military industrial corporations. Yeah, and I say corporations instead of the complex, because it's not too complicated to see that the corporations are driving this thing as these stakeholders. It's a public private partnership, so let's synthesize the private part of this. We'll be right back. Whether you're feeling like the blues or blue grass, ATS Radio has you covered. Check out a wide variety of annals on our app at APS radio dot com analyzing the globalists next

move and now the Deep Nut show. Well, Biden is invoking wartime powers for what for his climate war in the same way that Trump invoked wartime powers for his COVID war, these different mcguffins, and then Trump did it. He invoked wartime power so they could manufacture ventilators to kill people. Well, high eighties, low nineties percent of people who put on ventilators died. Biden is doing this so he can kill gas powered residential furnaces. He was to

get rid of our gas furnaces. So you know, they've all got something they want to kill. It's a war against us. And they both have the same tactic, don't they Both Trump and Biden petty little dictators going to war with their own people using executive orders. Whether there's ventilators or in the case of Biden, I guess you could say duckwork. But a Cold War era law that will pour tax payer funds into domestic manufacturing of electric heat pumps,

an alternative to gas powered residential furnaces. Well, I mean you could look at it and say, at least at the moment, of course, this is part of the Green agenda, is going to kill us all. But at this moment, you know, Biden is not engaged in directly killing people like Trump did with the ventilators. This is the same thing that they're

doing here. The federal government would award an a store one hundred and sixty nine million dollars for nine projects across fifteen sites nationwide and an effort to accelerate electric heat pump manufacturing. The significant level of funding was made possible with a grant from the Edinburgh Pandiction No after Biden utilized the nineteen fifty Defense Production Act

today's Defense Production Act. He said funds for heat pump manufacturing show that Biden is treating climate change as the crisis it is, said John Podesta, who is the White House clean energies are. Yeah, he's been involved in some other things too that weren't so clean, wasn't he. Yeah, the climate change as the crisis that it is now as the mcguffin that it is. It's the mcguffin. And he said, these are will grow domestic manufacturing.

They will create good paying jobs, good paying jobs for some millionaires and some billionaires in these companies that are getting graft and corruption. Were those jobs where people made gas furnaces that actually worked better? Were those not good paying jobs? So the people who are going to be making electric heat pumps, they're going to get better paying jobs, and the people are making gas stuff. Is that right? No? No, but they will be getting government money,

government money. No. The other jobs are just as good, and they made a product that people wanted and would purchase in the free market. So this is a harbinger that not only is Biden misallocating resource, essentially planning the economy, but also getting ready to ban the other stuff. Ben Lieberman, a senior at the senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. So do all the Biden administrations claimed climate emergency declarations? This may be the craziest of

them all. There is no shortage of heat pumps. It's just not that every homeowner wants them. Consumers ought to be able to decide for themselves. The government has no role in tilting the balance in favor of one energy source over another, or one appliance over another. But that is clearly what is happening here. Yeah, they want to micro manage our life and destroy it. That's the purpose. They're not even trying to help us. They want

to destroy everything. They want to tear firm the environment here. I mean, they're sucking CO two out of the air. In general. For the first time, you have they've already set up these facilities where they would go to some manufacturing facility or some power station where they're generating power, and they would capture the exhaust and they would extract the CO two and they would send it into a pipe and they would you know, the idea is to pipe

it all the way across the country and to start somewhere underground. What a bunch of nonsense that is. But it's even worse now, and it's gone from silly grifting lies to something that is really dangerous for us all. And now they're starting to set up these facilities where they're going to extract CO two out of the air. We need CO two. CO two is you take CO two out of the air, the plants are going to die. The more CO two that's there, The more the plants grow, the more they

produce oxygen and other things like that. But no, no, no, we're going to just we're going to cut the trees down and we're going to bury the trees. We're going to extract CO two out of the atmosphere. These people are insane, and the craziest ones are us for letting them get away with this. Meanwhile, as we look at this war that he has a against heat pumps. Biden goes to war with Americans. It's not just going to war with heat pumps. He's going to war with Americans and the

Pentagon. As I said early in the program, has failed to produce sufficient information for the accountants to do an audit six years in a row, and their budget is over three trillion, So there's no accountability for three trillion dollars. I don't know this stuff has gone missing like it did just before in January, you know, September eleventh, of January sixth, September eleventh,

and I've told the story. I won't go into detail about it. Lady, we went down to Wimberley in Texas and it's kind of a tourist area, just kind of hanging around. She's in a shop and she says, yeah, yeah, it was completely empty. Karen is looking around at some of the nick knacks, and I'm standing there, and so she wanted to talk, and so she starts telling me about all of her history, how she used to be in the military, she and her husband they retired.

She said, I got out just before nine to eleven. It's a good thing I did because because she said, you know that that missile went right through the office where I was working. And then she tells me, and we had trillions of dollars that was missing, and she said, I can't tell you how many congressmen and senior military officials resigned rather than facing the charges and crimes and all the rest of stuff. And she couldn't put that together.

She couldn't put it together. Asked her, I said, what do you get your news? Usually CNN? She could not connect the dots. And so you know again, Pentagon six years, three trillion a year. I mean, that's eighteen trillion. Now not all that is missing, but they can't really account for it. And the annual audits, the twenty twenty three audit, when the accountants did it, they added a disclaimer. A disclaimer of opinion is the technical term that the accountants use, which made that

there's not enough data here to form an opinion. So you paid us through an audit, but you wouldn't give us the data. So here's the disclaimer. We have no opinion. An unqualified or clean opinion would be the highest possible rating, and a qualified opinion is an acceptable rating. Both of those would mean that the auditors were given enough information to make a complete judgment, but they didn't get either one. They didn't get an unqualified and they didn't

get a clean. Instead, they got a disclaimer. I've got no opinion on this because you didn't give me any data on this. And twenty twenty two, the Pentagon only managed to account for thirty nine percent of its three and a half trillion dollars in assets. And then, of course there's the four budget estimations in the rampant over expending, like you see with the F

thirty five program. The estimated lifetime cost for the F thirty five planes one point seven trillion dollars, would make it the Pentagon's most expensive weapons project ever. A twenty twenty one Pentagon assessment of the F thirty five found eight hundred resolved unresolved defects still in the plane. This was before it was hacked by the Chinese. He ejected the pilot or whatever whoever hacked it. Chinese Russians, you know, they ejected the pilot and uh, whatever happened to the

point, we don't know about that either. Furthermore, in twenty nineteen, a loon the Pentagon made thirty five trillion dollars in accounting adjustments. Accounting adjustments. I was twenty nineteen. Now they point out thirty five trillion dollars that they made in accounting adjustments. It's bigger than the entire US economy. Talk about a fudge factor. You're looking at the repo market. Yeah, the Federal Reserve kicking in. You know, well, here's here's some money we

kicked into the repo market. That's about the size of the Puerto Rico's economy. And then a couple of weeks later, let's kick some that was about the size of the Swiss ecunty. The Pentagon is out there with their eraser making adjustments that in the thirty five trillion dollars bigger than the entire US economy. Pentagon budget is not only gargantuan, but it's replete with waste. These

shadowy practices have boosted the profits, however, of US weapons makers. That's why I say the military industrial corporations of Lockheed, Martin, Raytheon, Boeing, Northrop Grumming major gains made despite the challenges posed by inflation and supply chain issues caused by the pandemic. Along the same lines, the US government is expected to reach a one trillion dollar defense budget by twenty twenty seven. If

not before, I think it'd be way before. I mean, we've been up in the eight hundred billion dollar range for quite a while, and now with all these multiple wars are trying to get going fire up, I think they'll make it way before twenty twenty seven. The defense budget has expanded as a result of both the war, both these wars and Ukraine with Russia and as well as the guys between Israel and Hamas, and of course the eager

anticipation of a larger war with China and Taiwan. That's why they're doing all this stuff. Germany vows to massively expand their war effort in Ukraine even as they're melting down their economy. You know, we're in we've got suicidal people who are leading our countries in the West. Now, the suicide of the West, the suicide of actually it's a demicide of the West by his own government. Yeah, you want to describe government in three words? How about

war, death and poverty that they get through taxes. Germany is my overall value, the second largest source of weapons and combat material to Ukraine, having promised or delivered to Ukraine seventeen billion euros of military aid in all forms from late January twenty twenty two to July twenty twenty three. Over the same eighteen month period, the US delivered or committed about four forty one billion euros. So again, you know, we are way more than anybody else, more

than double the number two guys. And David Stockman. So as Uncle Sam doesn't have one thin dime for Joe Biden's hundred and six billion dollar war package, I'm going to be talking to him again about his new book. His new book is not on this, by the way, is another topic. Win your face with the next essential threat to your very national survival. He says, this is what you do. You mobilize your economy for an all out struggle, and you impose heavy duty war taxes to pay for a dramatic

buildup of military capabilities. And here's an example what happened during World War Two with the American government. Between nineteen thirty nine and nineteen forty five, federal government seats rose nearly sevenfold. On top of that came a huge amount of

war bonds and borrowing. You had is mostly for military mobilization. The military expenditures rose from less than ten percent of GDP in nineteen forty to a wartime peak of forty percent by the end of the war nineteen forty four to nineteen forty five. So he says, now, as you look at Israel talking about the Hamas attack, every single one of them is comparing this to Pearl Harbor. And yet there is no comparison to Pearl Harbor when you look at

the Israeli reaction to this. Netanyahu has insisted that Israel's withering bombardment of Gaza must not give way to a pause or a ceasefire, just as Washington did not stand down from Pearl Harbor either. However, where is Netanyahu's powerful budget speech to the Kanesset, there'd be equivalent to FDR's famous call to arms and economic sacrifice before the Congress in January of nineteen forty one. Member, it is December seventh. In nineteen forty two, it was December seventh, nineteen

forty one. Pearl Harbor happened, and in less than a month he said, all right, we got to massively ramp up. You see anything like that in Israel isn't Yahu talking about how they have to go undergo massive build up and we've got to have you know, we've got to suck it in and build it up. No, where's his lobbying campaign for an all out Israeli economic mobilization and stiff war taxes that would dramatically increase the government's claim on

the nation's economic source resources. No, of course not, because he's got Uncle Sugar who's going to pay for their war. They don't have to have any big military budget or any build up. We will pay for that. Where's the plan for a true garrison state with a vastly expand ded military budget and armed forces that be needed for the future to protect Israel's citizens from being

caught flat footed again? Where are the plans for the hundreds of thousands of additional soldiers it would be required to ensure that several thousand Hamas barbarians who inhabit the open air prison on Israel's southern border never again break through the properly sealed off militarized barrier on the perimeter of the Gaza Strip. There is nothing like that in the works. There is a whole lot of lobbying going on, but not in the Kanesset. Instead, it's in Washington. Uncle Sam is

flat outbroke. Washington cannot afford a single dime of the one hundred and six billion dollar package that Biden is trying to shove down the collective throats of America's Apolis of legislators. That especially includes the utter waste of another sixty one billion dollars for Washington's insane proxy war against Russia and Ukraine, and the fourteen billion

dollars for Israel as well. Israel has not yet even begun to tighten its own economic belt in order to pay for its war policy that its militaristic and religious extremist government insists upon. Instead, the pending usaid package amounts to only two and a half percent of Israel's GDP, and it comes on the back of Netanyahu's ceaseless, decades long campaign for a garrison state national security policy, but one that he funded on the cheap via a quasi pacifist defense spending level

Dogman said that's right. Israel's military expenditures had plunged from more than twenty percent of GDP at the time of the last existential crisis during the Yam Kapor War of nineteen seventy three, they were spending twenty percent of their GDP on military. Now they're only spending five percent. It's as of October the seventh.

When that happened. Netnyah Whuo falsely told Israeli voters that they didn't have to take the risk and make the territorial concessions implicit in a two state, diplomatically based solution to the Palestine problem. But at the same time they could also avoid having to be taxed to the gills for the alternative, a costly, heavily militarized garrison state. So we're not going to we are not going to make any concessions. We're going to be tough. We're going to have a

garrison state. We're going to approach this with a military with no political negotiations. But then they don't fund that garrison state. Instead, they're going to look to us to fund it. So, even more than the failure of Israel's vaunted intelligence operations and the run up to the October seventh massacre, the real deep policy failure is the flaccid blue line below, slouching toward five percent of GDP defense spending after the Net and Yahu coalition came to dominate policy in

the nineteen nineties. You simply can't have Garrison state policy. No negotiation with a Palestini is no two state solution, no continuation of OSLO or anything else. And do it on a four on a five percent GDP war budget unless

you get America to foot the bill. Israel seeks twenty five billion dollar defence budget, and he points out that the entire GDP of Gaza was twenty eight billion, and that they have a five hundred and fifty billion dollar national GDP, and their GDP, in other words, is twenty times larger than what is in Gaza. Their military budget is about the same size of the entire

GDP of Gaza, and yet they come to US for money. Between twenty twelve and twenty eighteen, net Yahoo gave Cutter approval for transfer of accumulative sum of nearly a billion dollars to Gaza in the form of suitcases full of cash, same kind of stuff that Obama was doing, where they ran by and doing giving them suitcases of cash, and we at least and at least half

of that is estimated to have reached Hamas, including its military wing. In an interview with the Whynutt News website in twenty nineteen May fifth, Netya Who's associate gershen Hakkonen Cohen, a major general in the Reserve, said quote, we need to tell the truth Netna, Who's strategy is to prevent the option of two states. So he is turning Hamas into his closest partner. Openly

Hamas is an enemy, but covertly it is an ally. Earlier that spring, in twenty nineteen, Netanyahu himself widely quoted as saying whoever opposes a Palestinian state must support delivery of funds to Gaza done in the case of suitcases of cash from Cutter because maintaining separation between the Palestinian authority in the West Bank and Hamas and Gaza will prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state. So that's where we are now. Now what is going to happen? The Pentagon is mulling

deploying marine regiments as the Israeli Hamas war rages. Yeah, they're going to send about I forget, I didn't put down it. Six to eight thousand people about the number of people that they kicked out over the vaccine. Eighty percent of them with a dishonorable discharge. We're not going to just send weapons, We're not just going to send money. We're going to send people. And as Jason said, they may not wait for people to voluntarily re enlist.

They might be recalled because not only will we pay for their war, but we will fight their wars for them as they go to war with us trying to ban everything, every little convenience in life, because nothing is too small to escape the purview of Biden. And these people who want to wage war on us with their climate justification, well they get us involved in an

actual war because we see what is happening with the pandemic. We'll be right back here News Now at apsradionews dot com or get the APS radio app and never miss another story. Liberty, It's your move. And now the David Knight Show. Some of the comments here is hearing girl says, I guess Netanyahu didn't just didn't kill off enough Jews with a jab. He has to thin out the herd a little bit more. Yeah, that's right, Jay Caravella talking about the heat pump wars that Biden is using. You know,

we're at war. We got a you know, send special financing in to make heat pumps. Jay Caravella says heat pump is the most inefficient thing ever created. It barely puts out a couple of degrees warmer than what is taken in. I know because we suffered with that. We we bought, we built a house. We're living in North Carolina, and I argued with this idiot architect that we had, and I was a general I was a general contractor for it, but I hired an architect. Oh no, heat pumps

are completely different. Now. It's like, seriously, I don't know. But he convinced me, against my better judgment, to get a heat pump, and we were shivering all the time. The only thing that saved us was that we had a really intense fireplace. We had a fireplace that had an interior that was I forget the material was made. It was some kind of sandstone or something like that. But it had a venting that went up

and around, and then they built the facade on it. But that thing had had smaller doors, very heavy doors, and we had in vented from the outside the fresh air coming in, and we could stoke that thing really big. I got it so hot that we melted the iron grate that was holding the logs up. And uh, and we did that on a regular basis. I mean, there wasn't any wood anywhere close around that thing.

It was all it was all marble and brick and everything else. But that, you know, it was that was in another room, and it still didn't help us in the bedrooms. It was still very, very cold all the time. I really hated that. He says, It's even funnier about it is there's no way that he pump is going to be adequate to keep people from freezing to death in Canada. That's right, that's right. It's for very mild climates like you would have in Florida or something like that.

And he writes Trude Hoe justin Stephen caspar I worked at a power plant in the nineteen eighties. They were burning oil and gas and ran almost perfectly clean. Everything was adjustable to do that. And they keep graphs that the EPA collected monthly. Yeah. Well, you know that's the thing. It's like anything you can make it diesel cars that are perfectly clean. But they're going

to ban him anyway. And this is, you know, just as last year, first time the EPA has put out emission standards to ban power plants, and it's just absurd. We know what their religenda is, there's no question about it. Jason Barker said, when the military terminates a contract early, they have to still pay out the full amount to the contractor. In that spirit, they should pay all the soldiers they kicked out. That's right, with full salary they would have gotten over the course of their contract.

I absolutely agree. Of course, there's not going to be any justice there. They will get very stingy. Isn't it funny how they are so free with money when it comes to their contractors, and how stingy they are when it comes to their soldiers. And this is what you see in government all the time when it comes to paying their friends. Money is no object and we don't really care to do any accounting. But oh, but you know, we've got to balance the budget here. That means we've got to do

something about social security. And I know that it's Social security and Medicare and these things. You know, that's the biggest part of the budget. There's not even any talk about transitioning in a way. There's no talk about maintaining their quote unquote Social contract if you will. So I've said before people criticized ain Ran for taking Social Security. She said, well, I had to pay it. I was forced to pay into it, and I was given

assurances that this is going to happen. And it's not a retirement account anyway. If you had an individual retirement account, and if you died before you depleted it, you could pass it on to your heirs. But you can't do that with Social Security because it's a Ponzi scheme. It was always designed that way. They picked the age of sixty five Bismarck did in Germany because

that was life expectancy of the time. That's why they keep saying, well, the best thing we can do is to raise the age of retirement because they never planned on anybody getting it greg talent. They will offer a path to citizenship to illegal immigrants in exchange from the military service. Yeah, that'll be part of it. Angus must nang. Maybe that's why they're bringing in

the army of young men across the border. You think they'll do that, do you think they'll find Maybe they'll bring them in and train them to fight us when they create the chaos in the Civil War. Angus Mustang Greg Talent. Yes, that's what I've been saying. They will load up the ranks of them as thirteen members or any immigrants that they can ye turn against the US citizens during martinal law. I haven't read that, but yeah, I agree. I think the same thing Teteb. Ninety seven four oh one.

Plenty of military age males seeking US citizenship, paycheck, healthcare, etc. Will gladly take a rifle and point it at anyone they are told to. Exactly, so let's talk about this is from Daisy Luther and the Organic Prepper blog. She says an insurgence of idiots, and so everybody's talking about insurgents everywhere. I guess that's the new point of view on TikTok these trend on social mediallity is a bunch of stunned young people making shocked faces at the camera

talking about the brilliance of Osama Lawden. And I see this is the problem that I have with it. I don't you know, is this? Why? Is this a big thing? Right now? Right? You should be asking yourself why now? Why have we not heard anything about Osam bin Laan's letter for twenty years and now all of a sudden we hear it. I have my real, real doubts about this. This guy is the Swiss army knife of misinformation from the CIA. They can use them for anything and everything.

So now we got from Tim Osmond, that's the name that they gave him when they would check him into the Pentagon, the CIA would and anything. So now Tim Osmond's stuff is out there. Do you trust anything about Osama bin Lauden? I don't quite. Frankly, I don't trust anything. But the other thing about it is is that was this letter from Osama bin

Laden? Do you care? Does it make any difference? It's as if you know, we got a letter from Anthony Fautsci about vaccines and pandemics, does that matter to you, Or if you got it from somebody that you would trust, you know, put in the name of one of these doctors or somebody that's pushed back against this stuff, does that make it legit? It should never make it legit. It's just like we're talking about different news

organizations, right. I've always had this discussion. You should never ban a news organization, which is what the CIA developed news guard working with Microsoft, an election guard. That's what they do, you know, they give labels and say, don't trust anything that this organization says. Meanwhile, you know they're most highly trusted news organizations like the New York Times, the Washington Posts and others like that. Oh, believe everything that they tell you. No,

you should be doing this on a case by case basis. New York Times and Washing Posts are even capable of doing something accurate once in a while, capable, but not usually doing it. And you know, even though somebody else that may be overall trustworthy, they everything that anybody says, it is not always one hundred percent true or trustworthy. People make mistakes, and then you have other people who deliberately try to lie to people. But they

don't make that distinction. They just say, well, I don't like the fact that they're opposing our government narrative, and so we're going to say that you don't pay attention at all to what these people do out there. But what difference does it make whether this letter is from Obama Osama? I always get them confused for some reason. I don't know. Does that make it

credible because it comes from Osama bin Laden? What does it say? You got to look at what it says and say well, is this true, because there's a lot that's in it that's not true, a lot that is opinion and conclusion. It's an op ed piece. Whoever wrote it, it should stand on its own as to whether or not it's true or not. I give references when I quote things because I don't want to plagiarize people. But it doesn't make something true because it comes from, you know, somebody

that you generally agree with. But Osama bin Laan is becoming the new Chegwavara of the TikTok generation, and so Daisy Luther says would call them useful idiots. I call them youthful idiots, because there's nobody that's more useful than the youth. And of course Lenin knew that. I think he was the one who called him useful idiots. TikTok has now rehabilitated Osama bin Laden nine to

eleven. They say was justified and an act of resistance. They say, well, you know, the reality is is that what is really scary about this is that this is multiple layers of idiocracy. Not only do these people believe it hook line and sinker, but even though they believe that Osama Lawden did nine to eleven and was able to take down in New York three say ice scrapers with only two planes, and they fell right into their footprint.

Even though they believe that's true, they support him, but truly is amazing. I mean, if you believe it, you would want to do something like go to war with Saudi Arabia, you know, not Afghanistan, but you'd want to go to war with Saudi Arabia. You do want to go after Asama bin Lan, which by the way, they didn't. It's kind of like you see what happened what's happening right now with Israel and Hamas. You have these terrasts who organize this thing, and they're living a life of

luxury and cutter and everybody knows that they're there. But you don't have the US negotiating turning over these people. You don't have Israeli assassins going there to take them out. No, they're gonna They're going to use this to pursue their agenda of what they wanted, which is land in territory. And I think that was a big part of what Afghanistan was all about. They wanted the poppy fields, they wanted the lithium that was there, and they use

nine to eleven as an excuse for that. But just as a reminder about what we're talking about, osam Bin Latten, let's remember what nine eleven was about. Here is a retired chief with the Fire Department of New York. How did you come to the conclusion that nine to eleven was a false flag? For the first ten years, I did not see New York Fire Commissioner

other than the official narrative. Then after being shown a video, a close up video of Building number seven coming down, and that got me going because it's obvious to me that Building seven was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. Did you basically break down and it wasn't even hit by a plane? Firefighting and construction for US, okay, I've been involved with heavy construction for over thirty years, been involved with the constructions of a

high rise steel framed buildings in Manhattan. I've worked on bridges and I know what goes into these buildings. I know what file loads that they can handle, how fire is going to act. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the impact of a jet. From what I understand the outer skeleton of the building, the outer columns, was like a fish net, and you had these inner core columns which were substantial, thick steel

beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. That the engineers always over designed a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since nine to eleven, so that should say something right there. I came across an analogy of the twin towers, and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked one on top of each other, the stoves up at the top, Yes there's fire and they've been damaged, but the stoves on the box,

they haven't been damaged. So the structure underneath all of that is intact. So it's impossible for a building to collapse near free full speed and increase without a control demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. Something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires. I think that. And they examined the dust and they found what they call thermitic material, which is like an explosive incendiary which was in

the dust samples, and that's document. I think the fireman knew something was up. City New York City Fire Department knows exactly what happened, and they've they've been told, you know, not to not to comment on it. They know. These are my brothers, These are the guys I went to fight fires with. These are the guys I grew up with. They don't see how you know, when you lose my friend Mike Kaefer. He was the only son, he was going to get married, he had a life

ahead of them. His parents were devastated. So you have all this, you know, collateral damage on top of that that people don't see that. It just infuriates me that something like this could take place. These people that did it don't even care about that. You know, you killed some of the best people in this country. You murdered them. Yeah, I learned a lot of people. They always do that, isn't it interesting? And

again that's the New York Fire Department, former fire commissioner. And there's been no change in building codes or construction. There's been no change in firefighting procedure. So obviously these people don't believe any of this stuff. The architects who are lying to you about that, they don't believe this, or they would change the way they build buildings. They don't change anything in terms of fire

fighting tactics or fighting a fire. And a skyscraper is he pointed outs, the only time before and since that you've had a steel core building that just collapsed. I've shown pictures of steel buildings in other countries on fire for days and there's nothing left but this, you know, steel structure, and it's leaning a little bit, but it still didn't fall. And so these people on TikTok are too stupid to understand that. And I say stupid, it's

stupid to believe the government narrative. This is beyond the magic bullet, stupid, incredibly stupid, so low information. And so, as Daisy Luther says, let's put aside for a moment all of our doubts about what occurred on nine to eleven, the actual culprit, because that isn't the topic of this

conversation. This conversation, these young people believe lock Stock and Barrel that the Biden bin Laden was a mastermind of attack on America, that he was able to kill three thousand innocent people, and they think that he is awesome, awesome. These are the double down dummies, ignorant haters, incapable of any critical thinking, and so she says, the letter is ravings about why they attacked America. And of course, again this supposedly surfaced about two thousand and

I think this was set up to enforce the CIA story. But now these idiots on TikTok are looking at it and in the context of what's going on with Israel and Hamas, and they've made him a hero. Where did we get into a situation that this crazy no sources are cided. He simply goes on on about the evils of America and Israel through the lens of his religious belief. Again, I think this is the CIA. CIA made him the

mastermind. We had to have a boogeyman. And even though in the narrative that they created most of these hijackers was in Saudi Arabia, they went to Afghanistan. Tim Osman, you know, the guy that's supposedly on a dilation dilator machine. He's running through the mountains with his dilator machine for years and years until he served the useful purpose of making Obama look good. Because Obama's

They've used this guy over and over again. I guess they were all really upset that Obama decided to kill this fictional character because now they've lost that. But now they're bringing him back, bringing him back. So you know, when you look at the CIA, think about the fact that the CIA organized

feminism campaign. They were very involved in that, using these radical feminists in the sixties and seventies, and of course, you know, creating the drug war, creating many of the drugs, but you know, running the drugs. The CIA is doing that to the extent of pushing abstract art and architecture, removing beauty from our society. The CIA has been at war, a satanic war against us. The climate stuff that's heavily footprints and fingerprints in that,

the poisoning of our minds everywhere. But of course they were also involved in the poisoning of our bodies. There's a CIA running these germ games going back to two months before nine to eleven. beIN Laden hated Jews, Americans, and gay people, just to name a few on his hit list. Again, I don't, unlike Daisy Luther, unlike Jerald Slindy, I don't even think this has been lauden. I think this was written by the CIA. And if you know this is you know their attempt to sow discord and

chaos and hatred and everything else. And it's an attempt to shore up again in two thousand and two, to shore up their phony war against their guy tim Osman. He believed the name body who died on nine to eleven deserved it and wasn't innocent because they paid taxes in a country that committed the acts against what he had grievances. He was filled with hate because the first segment of this manifesto mentions the Palestinians. These kids think that he is now a

beacon of truth. Well again, the fact that they would celebrate this is bad enough, and it's compounded by their total ignorance and gullibility to believe this CIA narrative in the first place. Again, I don't believe that this has been laden. It wouldn't make it true if it was. But they're now making bin laden another che guevera. The letter goes on to demand that everyone convert to Islam. It discusses how we've separated church and state in Americans,

says that's a bad thing. Well, it's only a bad thing if it's Christian, right, Yeah, See, the organizing principle left my entire life has been We've got to get God out of our society. We've got to get Christ out of our society. We got to purge any free exercise of

religion out of our schools and any other institution. And there is again, there is an ignorance and an inability to understand history to distinguish between establishment of religion and the free exercise of religion by people who work for the government, or work in schools, or who are students in schools, and all the

rest of this stuff. The letter concludes, if the Americans refuse to listen to our advice and goodness, guidance and righteousness that we call them to, then be aware that you will lose this crusade Bush began just like the other previous crusades in which you were humiliated by the hands of the moujah hadeen, fleeing to your home and great silence and disgrace. Well, she said, ignorance is bliss until it gives you a big fat dose of scharial law.

And so TikTok, they say, is cracking down on this, But that's another aspect of this. Daisy Luther says, I think the genie is out of the bottle. Well, it's more like a gin, right, that's what the Muslims essentially called a demon. Our young people have been radicalized, which is something I've written about before. They've been taught by our education system and our media to hate America. Yeah, because we're colonizers. And again,

that is what is going on with all this stuff about Musk. You know, he's pointing out, you've weaponized these kids along and Marxist agenda, along a Hitler agenda, where you've got to have the other, You've got to have some ethnic group that everybody is organized to hate. What was that group? Well, people like Jonathan Greenblatt at the ADL and others like that still celebrated and infended by the mass majority of Jews out there. They don't

say anything about that. They embrace that, but they weaponize us. Greenblat says, well, we got an oppressors Olympic. Well, he was one who said white people are the oppressors. It's not okay to be white, and we don't know not all lives matter, only black lives matter. This kind of tribalism that was pushed for power and money by the ad L, the Southern Powary Law Center and the federal government who was using them to do this. They were the surrogates for them, in the same way that Twitter

and Facebook and Google and YouTube were used for censorship. It was coming from the government. You know, the useful and well paid idiots. Well, they aren't idiots. They knew what they were doing at the ADL and the Southern Powary Law Center. They've been doing this for a long time. They've been running this oppression Olympics and this victimhood status. Everybody is a victim of white Christian males, and so we got to kill the white Christian males.

I'm sick of that game. I'm sick of the ADL. And you can call me whatever you want. I will I am. They've called me everything that they wanted to. You know, they've been doing this crying wolf stuff, and you know what, it's getting really old. That's why I defend Elon Musk on this. He's absolutely one hundred percent right about this. These people have been selling hate. They're whores selling hate. I'm sick of the ADL. I'm sick of Jonathan Greenblatt. He's the most racist, hateful person

out there and he's spewing this and projecting it on to everybody else. Yeah, it wasn't oppression Olympics until, as Victor Davis Hanson pointed out, until the Jews got labeled as white oppressors, white colonizers. They're not going to escape that once you get labeled by the mob that you created. Just like Grobspear created the mob and then he became somebody impowered create a mob to take

the people in power out. Well, then these Jacobins got into power and guess what, the mob came after them and they got sent to the guillotine. And so when you look at this TikTok stuff, you need to understand the bigger picture here. Why is it that conservatives are so focused on TikTok and now all of this stuff about Osam bin Laden And you want to know what I think is happening. I don't think this is something that happened organically.

In my opinion, this looks like a CIA operation. CIA going back and pulling up this letter that they probably wrote themselves back in two thousand and two and putting it out there, obviously antisemitic, as an excuse to take down TikTok and so TikTok is saying, well, we're going to aggressively take this stuff down and so forth. But you got all these people, all these conservatives who say we got to get TikTok down. Look, I agree,

it probably is a horrible piece of propaganda. So what these people, the ADL wants to censor, and people like Descent is doing it for them, going to Israel and signing a law in Israel, not in Florida, signing a law in Israel about hate speech. We'll take down your opponents. Got some cash, can you pay me? Now? I'm sick of this type of thing being done. And of course they want to take TikTok down because if they can ban an entire website, and imagine what they can do.

They can take down Rumble, they can take down Odyssey, they can take down bitch Shoot, they can take down substack because you know, that's all content that they hate. That's content that they've already been able to censor on YouTube and Facebook and other places. And so if you let this precedent of being able to take TikTok down, that's going to go everywhere. And so I think that the CIA is pushing this beIN Loden thing. I think

they wrote it. I think they resurfaced it and resurrected it. Oh look it's Andy Semitic. So now we can take down TikTok. You got UNESCO out there launching an action plan to regulate all Internet content and social media platforms. Let's see who was it that was at the UN under Trump. Oh that's right, it was Nuki Hayley, who's now the darling of Wall Street investors. They just love her. She's going to be so good for business

for the military industrial corporations. The plans were announced on November the sixth. The UN says the action plan it's action plan outlines the principles which must be respected as well as the concrete measures which must be implemented by all stakeholders. Whenever you see that, understand that these people are holding stakes that they want to drive through our hearts. They see us as vampires and vermin and a

virus and everything else that they've labeled us. So UNESCO is going to organize a the World Conference of Regulators middle of next year, a world conference of regulators who will do regulation without representation, just like our bureaucracies do now. We have taxation without representation from the bureaucracy in Washington, all under the president. You know, the entire swamp was under President Trump, that's the executive

branch. He did nothing about it, by the way. And so this swamp that taxes us without representation, this swamp that regulates us without representation, now they're going to get a global swamp a conference of regulators in mid twenty twenty four seven tenants. Number one, the impact on human rights at every stage will be examined by every stakeholder. Yeah, it doesn't say that they support these rights. It's going to be the compass for their decisions, you

know, the impact on human rights. But they very carefully don't say they support human rights. If they did, they be lying. Number two, independent public regulators are set up everywhere in the world with clearly defined roles and sufficient resources to carry out their mission. This is what the UIN wants. So they want public regulators set up everywhere in the world taking orders from them about what to ban. Number Three prevent digital companies from taking advantage of disparities

between national regulations. In other words, we're going to have one set of global rules. We're going to have some unelected global regulators. We're going to tell every sovereign nation what they must do centrally controlled censorship. Number four, Content moderation is feasible and effective at scale thanks to artificial intelligence and other things that are coming along. Number five accountability, they hold people accountable to them.

And transparency. Not transparency for what they do, but transparency for what we do. Transparency at all these platforms take a look at all of their algorithms and where are you hearing that with the FCC regulation as well. Number six, platforms must take make a take more initiative to educate and train users to think critically. Yeah, start with the Osama bin Laden. And finally, number seven, the bureaucrats and the platforms must take stronger measures during particularly

sensitive moments, like you know, elections and crises. Well, yeah, it's always an election is a crisis for them. They're worried that's going to get out of control. Now you see people on the right, like this article from Epic Times on zero Edge, millions of Americans are walking into a Chinese made trap, and they talk about how bad TikTok is, and it is it's stupid. I've never been to it though, I mean, I know how stupid it is because I've seen what libs of TikTok has pulled from

there. But look, do we ban everything that's bad? Is that a response everything that's bad needs to be banned and needs to be banned by the federal government. Well, you know there is another option. You don't have to use it, or you can do something that is positive, right, or you can oppose it publicly. It's very much like drugs. You know, drugs have not been over fifty years, they've not been able to stop the drugs by force of prohibition by banning. They did try to do it

legally. They understood the Tenth Amendment didn't give them the power to ban anything, and it still is there. So they don't have the authority to ban TikTok anymore than they have the authority to ban anything else without a constitutional amendment.

And that's why everybody went to the trouble of putting in the eighteenth Amendment when they wanted alcohol prohbition, Because the federal government doesn't have the authority to ban anything, whether you're talking about alcohol or tobacco or pot or TikTok or anything. They have no constitutional authority. The emperor has no clothes. That's

why Jeff Sessions was afraid to push that. As much as he hated pot, you know, the states could make it legal, you know, and say, well, we're not going to enforce those federal prohibitions, and there was nothing he could do about it. He did not want to have that argument. He didn't want to expose the fact that this is naked tyranny, that the emperor has no clothes, but the whole idea that everything that we don't like needs to be banned. This is essentially cancel culture. Do you

think the cancel culture began with a left. No, the right was doing that as well. We don't like drugs. I don't like drugs. I don't use drugs. Therefore, but I understand that it is a spiritual issue, not a law enforcement issue, and after fifty years, maybe the other people might understand that as well. I understood that a long time ago. I was in bands in college. Everybody was using drugs. The people on the band using drugs, the people in the audience were using drugs. I

didn't have to use drugs. I didn't use drugs. I said. That was to the engineers. I worked with, and they said, yeah, they probably thought you were a narc and probably did always been that way. Anyway, Thank god he saved me from saved me from addiction and a lot of other things before I ever got involved in them. Uh. But anyway, when you when you look at this, Okay, so they're they're freaking out about the fact that you got a lot of young people getting a lot

of their news. Was it forty three percent or something from TikTok And that's more than quadrupled. Okay, So you banned TikTok. Let's say the tristics full conservatives, and you get TikTok banned, Well, where are they going to go for their news? CNN, PBS, New York Times, Fox News? Where are they going to go to get their news? These are all phony places anyway. I mean you have to look at everything and with

a skeptical eye. Yeah, forty three percent of TikTok users say they regularly get their news on their site from thirty three percent who said the same thing a year ago. So it's increasing. So I guess you should get your news from the New York Post, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Washington Examiner places like that. I know these people are going to

get off a TikTok and start watching me. So but you know what I do is I look at this stuff and try to deconstruct it, try to make sense out of it, and try to deconstruct these lying narratives that the government has put together. Earlier this year, the Guardian published a piece of meticulous piece meticulously outlining how TikTok appears to be a part of the Chinese communist parties quote cognitive warfare campaign. Well, of course they are. Of course

they have a cognitive warfare campaign. Do you realize that the American government does as well? Oh they won't talk about that, will they They have a cognitive You know, Russia will tell you the truth about America most of the time. The lighty about Russia, same thing about the Chinese. Earlier this year the Guardian published a piece talking about that, and they said, it's the cognitive domain of their military operations. They always have to have a boogieyman

for for what purpose? For censorship, for internet totlitarianism. Look where we're just talking about Asama bin Laden, right, they had to have a boogieman so they could put in the Patriot Act. They had to have a boogeyman so they could have the Irockan Afghanistan Wars. They had to have boogeyman so they could usher in the police state, surveillance state. So TikTok is now the boogieyman to give themselves a power to arbitrarily seize and shut down any website

that is dissenting from their official story. That's what you need to understand about this. And when you look at Nikki Haley pushing all of this stuff, she doesn't want you to know her name. As a listeners pointed out, and we talked about this last week, but she demands to know your name because you know it's going to make the internet such a friendly, friendly place.

We'll be right back. Sometimes you want to go where everybody knows your name, as Batch came, You want to be where you can see say. You want to be where everybody knows your name. Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass. APS Radio has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at apsradio dot com. All right, Eric, thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. Thank you.

About nine to eleven. Chevkin three twenty one says, the B fifty two, the crash in the Empire State Building, that's right, in nineteen forty five, didn't bring that building down. Isn't that funny? Yeah? And isn't it funny that it didn't bring didn't bring the Empire State Building down?

And even though it didn't collapse into his footprint, they came up with more stringent building codes, which you know, even after you have three buildings, only two of them hit biplane collapse in their footprint steel buildings in just a couple of hours. They don't change anything about the building codes or the firefighting procedures. Militant Melankovic, if the heat warped the steel, it wouldn't

fall straight. Make that make sense? That's right. Yeah. I've said before we didn't have TV to watch any of this stuff as it was unfolding, and and we had relatives in New York. As a matter of fact, Karen had a cousin who worked in one of the nine to eleven, one of the trade center buildings got out, and so you know, her parents were calling us with updates and all this other kind of stuff, you know, And yeah, they were and and then you know the phone call.

She says, one of them is falling down, and I'm thinking, I thought, wow, Manhattan's not that big. This thing falls. How many buildings did it knocked down? How many? You know? How far down in Manhattan did this thing collapse? And never occurred to me that this thing would fall straight down in its footprint. And then another and then another one that wasn't even hit by a plane te Ub ninety seven four One free fall speed is the key. The laws of physics dictate that can only happen

if all the supports are cut simultaneously. Exactly right, Nathan Bedford, Force, eighteen sixty five. It was a B twenty five Mitchell bomber that ran into the Empire State Building. The B twenty five is much much smaller than a B fifty two, that's right, you know, I think they'd be fifty two's came along by until World War two or around then or after. I guess a B twenty five mass gross weight is about fifty thousand pounds.

A B fifty two's max gross is over three hundred thousand pounds. Still, it was hit by a plane, didn't fall down, and they still changed their procedures Jason Barker, just like cup Operation Northwoods exactly. They had the exact plan to get us into a war with Cuba back in the early nineteen sixties. They just recycled that plane that was shut down, that plan that was shut down by JFK. That's right. They said, we can make

it look like Cuba did this. We can fly planes into buildings, and we can pose fake hijacks, so you know, we can have people calling in and saying that you know, they're in a plane that's been taken over, and then destroy the plane over the ocean where nobody can find it. You know, it was everything that happened on nine to eleven, you know, with was it United ninety two, ninety eight, something like that, Audi modern intro radio. JFK wasn't pro secret societies, says she had on

secret societies weren't pro JFK either, Yeah, very much. As a matter of fact, you know, the guy who was putting that stuff together,

Liman Limitser. He fired him. He went to Europe, became head of NATO after that, so he was chair of the Joint Season's staff when they did the Operation Northwoods, and then he sends him you know, he gets fired, he becomes head of operations in NATO, and that's when they ran Operation Gladio, this false flag that you know, had these NATO people pretending that they were communists, you know, shooting people and killing people, killed,

kidnapped, and then killed. Aldo Moro, the Prime Minister of Italy and the Italians did an investigation and said that Steve Pachennik favorite guy, their favorite guest of n four Wars do They had it on and on, over and over and over again. Steve A. Cennick who sold the lie about the sting January the sixth, while he was sent by Henry Kissinger to trying

to negotiate for the release of Aldomorro. What the Italian government said was that Oldhamorro saw through all this, and Steve Achenick said, got to kill him. Then went on to help to write fantasy novels with about spice stuff with Tom Clancy Brian Taylor. The twin towers were built with a possibility of planes crashing into it in mine. So the official narrative is BS Yes about Osama. KWD sixty eight says anyone can be a hero. Lucifer has been a

highly rated TV show that's now. I saw that there was a TV show like that. I haven't seen it. Ripper sixty seven to twenty. In my opinion, Ben Lauden was not a man but an idea. Well, it might have been some guy named tim Osman. I don't know. It's a look Cat nineteen. I'm a bin lot and a useful boogeyman that never dies. Yeah, because even though it runds me so much, wag the

dog, you know where they've got. They're playing this game. They got a hero that's coming back and they're doing and then like the other guys realize that they're playing this guy up and they kill off the guy and it's like, oh, they put a narrative out that is planning and crashed about Biden's carbon war. Karen Carpenter says, plants need CO two to thrive, animals need plants to thrive on So it all adds up to life not doing it doing too well. That's right, That's what the big plan is for.

And so when we see that the UN UNESCO in particular is going to be setting up a big conference next year to come up with global rules for everybody from unelected bureaucrats to control everything, to make sure that none of these corporations get a pass because they're based in a particular country. All the countries together are going to come together and say no, you know, we're going to shut down Twitter or whatever. If there's any speech thing, we'll be able

to shut it down. You got Nicki Haley out there saying everybody's got to have an ID. I got to know everybody's name. They're pushing everything and it's all to protect the children. You've got conservative Republicans saying we got to have IDs so kids don't get porn online. You got others saying, well, artificial intelligence is going to be creating all kinds of fake stuff, so you're going to have to prove that you're a human and also give Nicki Haley

your name. We're not going to control AI, we're not going to control the smut generators or whatever. You've wanted to do something again, I don't think that that would work. That, like drugs, is a spiritual issue, which doesn't really lend itself to any kind of government prohibition. Unfortunately, if only it were that easy, right, get rid of all these demons

that addict us and control us and imprison our spirits. Not that easy, you know, we keep using keep using a hammer when a nuclear weapon would be better. You know, our weapons are mighty. As Christians, we can pray because we have a mighty God. But instead we would prefer to try to use these little hammers to hammer everything, because everything looks like a nail to be prohibited by the government. And so you've got all these different

threads that are coming together for censorship. Right. The TikTok thing is just another one. Nikki is just another one. They are coming at it from multiple places, and of course the FCC Commissioner, the FCC has exerted its plan for Internet control last week. I haven't talked about this yet, and it is all about DEI. Even Biden is calling it digital equity. Digital equity, Well, we know what that means. They've used DEI programs to

punish people. You get sorted into different groups, many of these groups based on characteristics that you can't change, like your skin color and or even your gender because you can't really change the gender. If you're a man, you know, you get kicked to the side here as well, and so they sort you to these different boxes. Some boxes are good, some boxes are bad. They've got a hierarchy. How many good boxes did you check? How many bad boxes did you check? That's what this is all about.

Digital equity or digital equity is no different from diversity, equity and inclusivity. It's all about intersectional ranking. That's what they call it. When they put you in the boxes, then rank the boxes good and bad. Biden's plan hands the administrative state, the FCC in this particular case, effective control of

all Internet services and infrastructure in the country. Isn't that convenient? You know, just as the UN is coming up with this marching orders for what everybody is supposed to do, they're laying the groundwork through the FCC for them to be able to implement the plan, which we've already known that was a plan. I read you the seven points. It's horrible, but it's just like

the CBDC. We know what CBDC is intended for, and we know what their censorship of the Internet is intended for, and so never before and the roughly forty year history of the public Internet, has the FCC or any federal agency for that matter, claimed this degree of control. Indeed, Biden's plan calls for the FCC to apply a far reaching set of government controls that the agency has not applied to any technology in the modern era, including Title II

common Carrier, said Brendan Carr, a former FCC commissioner. He says this is unprecedented, and he's also says it's unlawful. Congress never contemplated the sweeping regulatory regime that Biden has asked the FCC to adopt, let alone authorize the agency to implement it. Of course, that's Congress. That's so old school. We don't do regulation with representation anymore. We have regulation as being done

by executive orders by our tyrants, whether it's Biden or Trump. They do executive orders now, and then the regulatory agencies, whether it is the FCC or the ATF under Trump, you know, they just implement these orders and do whatever they wish. They don't have to be accountable to the Constitution, and they don't have to get our approval. They don't have to be held accountable to us or stand for election or that stuff. And what's even worse

is when they put these rules together. You understand, they use the legal fiction that we will call these rules instead of laws. Even though they have the same they use them under color of law. So they use these rules as if they were law. But they say, well, since this is not done by your elected representative, since this is regulation without representation, these rules are not laws, and we don't have to obey the Constitution when it

talks about due process or presumption of innocence or protection against excessive fines. We'll just do all those things to you because these are rules, they're not laws. That kind of cynical, kafka esque speak. This makes me want to throw up. I hate this regulatory state, this regulation with that representation, and as bad as it is, as bad as it is that they're writing laws, they say, well, with rules, you don't have any protection

against you know, we can do it without due process. We can punish you as much as we want. The cost of car the former FCC commissioner car Side, The Biden administration's broad band policies are failing. The Costs of building internet infrastructure in this country have skyrocketed due to Biden's economic policies. Of

course, everything is skyrocketed due to his economic policies by design. While the FCC has been looking to expand new five G services, he said, it's needlessly blocked and delayed new broad band infrastructure bills because of reglatory red tape. Well, because they want to control everything, right, I mean, I don't even want new five G services. I reject this. It hasn't been tested. We don't know if it's safe. Plenty of evidence that it's unsafe.

We know that it is the necessary foundation for the smart cities and the full time surveillance and police state. So I don't want any five G services, But they don't want them for a different reason. They want to make sure they completely control everything. Biden has chosen to blame the private Secretary says

in free market capitalism for the administrations on policy shortfalls. If passed, the FCC would be empowered for the first time to regulate every ISP's service termination terms, the use of credit, the account history, the credit checks, account termination, among many other things. Look, I'm not interested, and well, we want to have you know, the free market work as good as spot. That's not what this is about. Really, this is about them

being able to control everything. Because what they're doing is they're exercising this control over ISPs. It will eventually drive them out of business or make them or take them over to such a degree that they're just a little bit of a pass through for the government. Regulatory This is about the government directly controlling everybody. There'll be a little bit of an in direction and then eventually that'll disappear. They're not talking about, you know, how can ISPs better serve people

or whatever. And the Republicans get on the side of this to say, well, let's carve out a little bit here so the big business can still make some money because they give me money when I run for Congress and that type of thing. That's not what this is. Ultimately, this is about

complete control, and that's why they're doing this. The government wants to be able to shut down our life except through the virtual reality of the Internet, and then they want to control that completely and shut us out of that because you're going to have to have their number, their mark for the beast government. You know, again, the beast is a reference to the government. You're going to have to have that in order to buy, sell, trade,

move anything like that. That's part of it. Complete control, global control. The Biden administration's plan, says the SEC former Commissioner, and powers the FCC to regulate every aspect of the internet sector for the first time ever. And when do we see that they want to regulate every aspect of energy.

They want to regulate every aspect of the internet, every aspect of our food and our transportation and everything that we see here and say, so we see no evil, we speak no evil, and we hear no evil. The plan is motivated by an ideology of government control that is not compatible with the fundamental precepts of a free market capitalism. Way, if that isn't a understatement, Biden is turning digital discrimination into a pretext for regulating everything. Yeah,

how is that different? Right? When they want to shut something down or shut somebody up, what do they call you racist? And that's what the ADL has been doing for them for the longest time. Oh, you're racist. Okay, we can cancel you, and we can cancel this, and we can cancel that. That's what all of this is about. And that's coming not from the former FCC commissioner, but from a former FCC policy advisor, Evan Schwartz Traumber. He said, to call it extreme or radical

doesn't do this proposal justice. Senator Cruz reacted to that, saying Democrats are hoping to convince the American people that broadband internet is so racist that they need to plow ahead with government mandated affirmative action, race based pricing again, racist for anything. They want to destroy, anything, they want to cancel, anything they want to take over in control. That's what's going on here. So Cruz and twenty seven of his colleagues called on the FCC to rescind its

draft. Worry, see, this is how we got here. You know, you'll have maybe a quarter of the Senate we'll oppose this, but nobody will oppose the regulatory state that just does whatever it wants because they like that they have. The Senate and the House have both agreed that they don't want to have responsibility for making laws. They would rather have show hearings and show trials and this and that. But they don't want to actually have to write

laws. Besides, they could never get the kind of oppressive government that they want if they had to actually pass all these laws. So they punt it over to the bureaucracy, and the bureaucracy moves so quickly that the boiling frogs wake up and complain about it. Well, then Congress can come in and pretend that there are saviors and adjust that little thing just a little bit and make them pull it back. You saw that with the FAA a few years

ago. They said, well, you know, even if you've got a drone that's about the weight of a paper airplane, you'll have to report that to us and pay a twenty five dollars fee to report it. And if you don't report it to us and we see you flying this, well then we're going to hit you with a twenty five thousand dollars find Everybody said, what this is crazy, So they talked about it. They pulled it back a little bit. But look, this is all under the executive branch.

Trump is not going to change anything. He didn't change anything the first four years. As a matter of fact, he increased this by doing gun control by executive fiat and then giving us martial law by executive fiat as well. We'll be alright back. Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere, from country to blues, classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy. Get details

at apsradio dot com. If you are listening to the David Night Show. Well, something did happened over the weekend. Uh, very surprising. Yesterday we had the elections in Argentina and Javier malai one and the establishment press is freaking out about this. They're afraid that he might set a new trend, might show what happens when you've got free market economics. It's a tall order. I don't know if he'll be able to get it done. He's like,

you know, a man alone. He doesn't have a big party there, so not clear whether this is going to be able to work or not, or how they will use this. And I've said even before the twenty sixteen election, I said, if you've got somebody who's really popular as Trump wise, I said, they will rig the elections if the elections are close. But if there's if you've got somebody who's popular enough, they're not going to try to rig the election. You know, if it's again, if

it's a very narrow thing, they can squeak it out. But if it's a landslide, they're not going to do anything about it. And we see that even here in some of the states. But I said, what they'll do is they wait. I said this about Trump and twenty sixteen, I said, he's so popular. I think that he's going to I think he's going to win, and then they'll oppose him afterwards. And of course they did, and they were already opposing him even before the election with all this.

Oh well, you know, I violated all of the national security rules and regulations, says Hillary. Well, who released that information about me? That's what I want to know. Forget about the crimes, forget about what was there. I want to know who did this? You know that red hearing And so I imagine that they'll do the same thing with him. You

know, the fight is just beginning. He has now got himself into in a tight spot now, as George Clooney would saying, brother, all right, though he's in a tight spot now and it's going to be really tough for him to do anything about it. But he did make that first hurdle there. And listen to the headlines like from Reuters Argentina elects quote shock therapy unquote, libertarian aver Malay as president and again just a reminder, one hundred

and fifty percent inflation. But they think that this is just too risky to try to do anything different. Let's just keep going down the same path that we did. Maybe it'll all just go away. And I've talked several times to Axel Kaiser, who wrote the very popular, best selling street Economics, best selling economics book in South America, and he's translated into English recently,

so I've interviewed him a couple of times. And you know, I am somewhat surprised because I figured that the well two things that were happening and we had he came in second when they had the first runoff. So when I first had the election the summer, he surprised everybody becoming by coming in in first place. But they have a lot of different candidates, so they said, all right, we'll take the top three vote getters and we'll have another

election. And they did that what about a month, the six weeks ago or something like that, and at that time he came in second, and the top vote getter was the socialist communist Paranista, who, by the way, is the Minister of Economics when they've got one hundred and fifty percent inflation. And so it was set up to where the older generation loved Parone and

Avida Parone and the Paranistas and they loved socialism. It was the young people who are looking at this, as Axel pointed out Axel Kaiser, the young people will look at this and say, I haven't got any future. This is insane. They had known nostalgia about one Parone and Avita Parone, like you know, the delusional, schizophrenic maga people have these, you know, images that they've built of Trump, and it was the same type of things.

Its cult of worship of a personality. But the younger people were looking at it. And so their secret weapon was going to be Taylor Swift opening up her con CERTs in South America, you know, one in Brazil, another one in Argentina. And we were laughing about the fact that mainstream media here in the United States said, well, maybe they can pull this off, Maybe they can convince young people that they want to stay with socialism,

stay the course. And so they had Swifties against Freedom Advances self owned name the Taylor Swift fans who were against his party, which is called Freedom Advances. But when you look at the phrase, it was really pretty funny. So again Reuters says he is an outsider with radical views to fix an economy battered by triple digit inflation, a looming recession, and rising poverty. Well it's one hundred and fifty percent inflation, they said, And of course he

won by fifty six to forty four, so it was pretty good. I went. And, by the way, the reason he came in second and that the party that came in third was a business party. So that's why it looked unless it was going to be cheating, it looked like you would get this kind of result. So maybe they had an honest election because the Conservative pro business party threw their support behind him. Once that party was eliminated,

and so the Paranista. As I pointed out before the second election where the Paranista came in first place, he pulled out all the usual stops. Even as they were having hyperinflation, and he was the economics minister. One hundred and fifty percent inflation. He decides that he'll lower taxes and increased giveaways to people, added some new social spending programs and things like that. So I thought, well, is that going to work? Is it going to

work to have the swifties on his side, the not so swifties. Maybe, Well, none of it did, and he cleared that hurdle, and so then this is the way it is reported by Bloomberg, Argentina takes a leap into the unknown. Better to stay with the devil that you know,

right, the socialist paradistas who have ailed at everything. According to Bloomberg, I guess libertarian outsider Javea Malay won Argentina's presidency, promising a radical shake up to fixed decades the policy of mismanagement, a strategy that resonated with a populace suffering under a nose diving economy and one of the world's worst inflation rates today, starts the building of Argentina, said Malay Malai. He said, there's no room for gradual measures. But they push back and they say, well,

some economists are warning. In other words, they are they don't like it, right, because then further down they actually have a Bloomberg writer who opposes them. That's always attack to these Well, some people have said this, and then they say what they want to say, but out their opinion. Anyway, He says there is no room for gradual measures. He wants to ditch the Argentine peso for the US dollar. He wants to close the

central banks. It wouldn't this be a nice example. If he's able to do this, maybe somebody could get some ideas about our own central bate and have drastic cuts to public spending in an attempt to jolt the country out of

its forty six million people out of its malaise. And so then Bloomberg says, well, some economists, some economists, unnamed economists warn that dollarizing the six hundred and twenty two billion dollar economy at a time when international reserves are depleted could tip the South American nation into another bout of hyperinflation, another bout. International Monetary Fund officials have meanwhile called on the next government to swiftly reset

the economy, emphasizing that there is no time for gradual policies. So not even the IMF agrees with Bloomberg, Not even the IMF, because they want to get some money out of this thing. Potential will now turn on how Malai implements his most contested measures with only a handful of representatives and a fragmented Congress and an impatient electric with more than forty percent of Argentines below the poverty

line. See this is this is where it gets difficult, because he's going to have to put together some kind of a coalition to getting this stuff done, unless he decides he's just going to operate by executive fiat like Trump and Biden. I don't think he's like that, though he's not going to He's going to take office December the tenth. The Central Bank has nearly run out of international reserves to prop up the PAESO, meaning a large currency devaluation is

expected any day now. Despite his non existent party structure, he placed first in the August primary, shocking political establishment. Then that in October that that was when they had the second one, and then the pro business block of a former president was eliminated, and so their candidate then and worst, Malai. He is has a very interesting persona well they Wall Street Journal when they do articles, they don't talk about his free market economics. Let's not talk

about that. They talk about his hair. They talk about the fact that he has a dog, a favorite dog of his that died and he had him cloned. He's got a lot of dogs and he's named them after economists, like you know, Milton Friedman. He's got Milton and you know the other. He'll be Argentina's first formally trained economist elected to the top job, and of course they desperately need an economist, and he is somebody from the Austrian school of economics. As we talked to our guests last week who was

with the Musa's Institute. He's from the practical school that practically works. He has accused the parentised opponent and his allies running a campaign of fear, but he walked back some of his most controversial proposals, such as loosening gun control. In his final campaign ad, he looks at the camera and assures voters that he has no plans to privatize health care or education. Unfortunately, but

again they keep the epithets coming ap fiery right wing populist. He's not libertarian now, he's a populist according then, because that's a dirty word to say, a populist. So meanwhile, how was Taylor Swift in her army doing? It was a big defeat for them, even though in when we look at Riodesian era in Brazil, she goes there for her concert and they have

this giant statue up there of they call it Christ the Redeemer. So they've got this statue that's supposed to look like Jesus whatever Jesus looked like and in a robe with arms outstretched arms. And what they did was they projected her stuff about her and her albums and everything projected it on. There's a yeah, you pull that up and show people what that looks like and make that bigger. Yeah, there you go. So they essentially got Jesus wearing a

Tailor Swift T shirt. That's that you can look at that. She's getting into John Lennon's territory here, I think, or whoever did that. Yeah, bigger than Jesus, right, even the big Jesus that's up there in the hills. Rio Mayor Eduardo Pays confirmed that the little symbols and the projection were meant to evoke Swift on Thursday, and he gushed that she was as big as Michael Jackson, you like all the rest of us is, you know, died and all of us will die, so you might want to

stop comparing yourself. Well, he didn't directly compare her to Jesus, but you know, in terms of political logic, I am a mistake, said Malai, because what I have come to do is in fact to stamp out the privileges of politician. Again, he wants in the currency controls that protect the peso, and he does favor laxer gun control, although he's walked back on that. He also talked about tighter rules on abortion. You know,

across the board he was leaning conservatives. Why the American press hates him so much? One Gonzalez, Of course the press there hates him as well. A journalist and an author on a biography of Malai. The biography is called El loco, which means the crazy one cast doubt on the wisdom of electing a leader who is seeking radical change at a time when inflation is one hundred

and fifty percent state that's a rising in recession is looming. Okay, So according to this guy, they should keep on doing the same things they've been doing. So who is crazy. The person who's crazy is the one who says, well, let's keep doing the same thing we've been doing all along and hope for different results. That truly is crazy. So we need to stay the course, even though we got one fifty percent inflation, massive reception,

recession and people falling into poverty. Let's stay the course and keep electing our socialist, communist government. Let's not try anything different. Harp says the bloke wants to get rid of the peso for the US dollar and is an Avid israel fan. Well, the first part of it there, in terms of getting rid of it. I don't like the Federal Reserve, but he

says it's more stable than he says. All the central banks are awful and he doesn't support central banks, but he says there isn't any central bank that is worse than the Argentine Central Bank. And I guess you could make a point that if you look at their inflation rate of one hundred and fifty percent, maybe they are the worst one that's out there unless you have Zimbabwe or somebody that's a little bit worse. But again that is a stopgap measure.

What he wants to ultimately do, as we talked about in the interview with the guy from Sir Thharnton from the Mesa's Institute, he wants to get back to people owning gold and silver and get the money, get the government out of the money business. That's the economic school that he subscribes to, you know, the Austrian school, and he believes in that, but he sees the you know, getting shutting down the Argentine Central Bank and shutting down the

Argentine Peso. He sees that as a stop gap measure. So we'll see about that. But I don't think that they're going to be sending any money or troops to Israel, unlike US. So we're gonna take a quick break and we will be right back. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing. Check out the Jazz Channel at APS radio dot com and the APS Radio app

and leave the stress behind. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, let's talk a little bit about some other pro life issues besides stopping war. Nikki Haley's attempt to thread the needle on abortion. It's the way that Business Insider put it. Well, I think what she's trying to do is not thread a needle, but she's trying to thread the forceps. Maybe that's what she's trying to do here. Nikki Haley has called for a consensus on

the issue of abortion. She's going to bring for us a consensus on abortion, something we haven't been able to achieve for fifty years. Right, Well, if you want to have a consensus, that means that you've got to show that what is actually happening to the babies that are being killed. She doesn't want to talk about that. What she wants to do is to have a consensus of financial donors on Wall Street. And as we've seen over and

over again, they don't care. They don't care about the murder of babies. They only care about winning. And if this is something that's going to be difficult for them to convince people not to kill babies, to show what the truth of the abortion is. If that's an issue, then these financial backers say, drop that issue. The important things that we win so that

you can give me a payback for the money that I've given you. Because return on investment for these politicians is really very high, and they want to get that. If they win, they win really big. You know, you're going to get like a twenty five hundred percent return on investment or better. But they have to win. Haley is anti abortion, says a business insider. No, you're not. If you want to try to make exceptions, carve out exceptions on you're not, you're not. It's a matter.

Then we look at the other side of this, this progressive group that is operating out of Washington, DC. Several of them have been arrested for violating the Face Act, which again is being weaponized like the January the sixth stuff against pro lifers. But they've been very active in terms of protesting. And these people are true progressive, They are true leftists who for whatever reason,

have I don't know where they're coming from. They don't seem to be coming from a religious standpoint, but I don't know what their basis of objection is to it, but they seem to have a clear moral objection to this, and they have used all the tactics of the left. And so the Daily be says, these progressive anti abortion group is playing dirty to get ahead. So that's just it. You know, they're going around bring graffiti everywhere and

writing slogans everywhere, the same kind of stuff that progresses always do. I mean, I would imagine they're going to start gluing themselves to the sidewalk or something or the road, you know, that kind of stuff. I don't think really changes hearts and minds. And I don't think really that there's going to be you know, we can show people what the truth is and we can pray that God is going to change hearts and minds. That's what we

can do. You know, spraying graffiti and insulting people and getting in their face about that does not work. It doesn't work for the left, it doesn't work for the right, It doesn't work for any of these issues. It's not going to work for the pro life issue either. No, the tactics of the left won't do it. You have to show the truth and then you have to pray for God to change, to change hearts and minds, to open them up to the truth. The truth is there that abortion

is murder. You don't have to spray paint the slogan abortion is murder. You need to show people what the abortion procedure is like. You need to show people the aftermath of the abortion procedure. Then they will understand that abortion is murder, or at least if they haven't hardened their heart that much. So this summer, pedestrians, drivers and passengers in DC so a new type of graffiti amongst the usual urban scrawls and anti abortion advocacy, designed to troll

this democrat city. Again, they prefer to these colors I hate that stuff, blue and red. The group is called Progressive Anti Abortion Uprising, and again they want to do all the stuff that the left does, you know, taking over buildings. And this is another thing that I didn't like about January sixth. That's not a persuasive It never accomplishes anything. You know, show up and scream at people to shut down hearings or this or that. I mean, that's a code Pink thing. It doesn't work. It doesn't

change people's minds about anything. And if you're conservative, will throw you in jail for doing that. Just ask going you know, Code Pink gets away with that, but not if you're a conservative operates mostly in the nation's capital. They've embarked, they've embraced whether they're all kinds of media and as Daily Beast likes to say, and misinformation to communicate a smash mouth message. And so again, you know, this is a leftist approach to this, which

I don't think is going to work. Graffiti is part of it, decorating public spaces, celebrating defacement. I mean, here they think they are they can't do this stuff. Now. These are progressive tactics that Daily Beast has never criticized, but when you do it for this issue, they'll criticize it. So again, why why focus on this? Because as critics. As Christians, we understand that we have a much better way to do this. We have weapons that are mighty. By the way, we're talking about prayer.

There is a very important thing to keep in mind. I saw this on a couple of different sites, talked about it. This is a guy who was a street preacher and he just collapsed and they thought they he had some kind of a seizure or something. They happened to the hospital. They found that he had been shot in the head. And they don't know who shot him. Somebody that was standing around there, or somebody that's in a passing car, whatever. Nobody heard anything, but he was shot in the

head while he was a street preaching sharing the gospel. Arizona church leader in critical condition after being shot in the head while street preaching. He is only twenty six years old. He's a father of two. A CT scan revealed that he had been shot. He began seizing and was intubated. There's been some movement, however, physicians are uncertain how much of the movement is voluntary, and they began draining fluid from his brain. No suspect has been apprehended.

They're not even sure, you know, no witnesses. Really. Again, it wasn't until they got him in and did a CT scan that they saw the bullet. Who knows why somebody we wanted to take out take it out on a preacher like that, because he was speaking good news to everybody. Well again, keep him in your prayers, and let's see where is his name? Looking here? Just keeps talking about a street preacher. But I don't see his name here. I'm looking everywhere in the article. Oh

Schmidt, Schmidt is his last name. But God knows who he is, so please pray for him. It's just really horrible to see it. Another street preacher, Great Comfort is finds himself at the center of a controversy. They're trying to demonize Mike Johnson by saying, well, Licky's had involvement with Great Comfort. Who does street preaching? It's it's kind of a different thing.

He he You'll see a lot of his videos on YouTube. He will walk up to somebody and say, hey, you got a moment you want to talk, and they volunteer to do it, and they agree to be on video publicly on video, and he starts asking them what they believe about God, And you know what, they think their basis of you know, standing before God when they die. You know, you know you're going to die, and uh, you know, what what is it that you're going

to tell God? And so you know, they typically they don't think that they've done anything wrong, and so they spend some time convincing them that they have done things wrong, We've all done things wrong, that we're all condemned in God's sight. And then he tells them and by the way, somebody's already paid your fine. You know, if you had traffic violations or something, somebody paid your fine, you'd be able to walk out. He said, well, Jesus paid your fine. You know, why don't you Would

you trust in that? Would you think about that? You know? And so it's interesting to see how people will react to that. And that's basically what his thing is. And yet you have Politico the size that they will try to demonize Mike Johnson. Look, Mike Johnson's to point out before, he's not perfect. I mean, there's things I disagree with him, especially if he's a Christian. Why flip flop on Ukraine? Why support that war?

I understand why he's supporting Israel because it's a theology that I don't agree with, but he's a Zionist on that. I think, you know, regardless of what you think, the end of the world is going to be, Like, God doesn't need your help to make it happen. God has told you what to do. He's told you to defend life, whether you're talking about life in the womb or life in a foreign country that you can't find on a map, or that you don't know anything about. That's the

problem. We keep getting involved in these conflicts. We don't know anything about either side. Most cases, we can't even find it on a map. And I was like, went out the quote I think it was from hl Mincon He said, God gives America wars so we can learn geography. Right, that's the only thing we find out about it. We still don't understand what was happening there. Just like in Vietnam after the war. You know, we got this domino theory happening, and you have McNamara, who was

a whiz kid that ran that thing. He goes back to Vietnam and the guy pounds the desk. He says, don't you know anything about history? For a thousand years we fought China we're not there, puppet. This was not a Domino thing. It's like, Oh and McNamara film that the Fog of War. Just before he died. He said, yeah, I didn't know that. Whiz Kid doesn't know anything. He may have known the geography.

We all learned the geography about Vietnam, didn't we the hard way, But he didn't know anything about the history or who was there, or this or that. And so we get ourselves involved in this stuff again. Before we're going to get involved in wars. As a Christian, maybe you know, we can pray for Mike Johnson that he will understand that God has given him clear orders to be pro life, that they are just war principles that should be followed. So maybe something will come of that. But again a

lot of slander statements. I'm not going to read the back and forth about why they accuse him of It's nearly not very important, frankly, and I would much rather read you this letter from a listener. Ron. He said, you know, boomers watching wonder and dread that our country is falling, failing rather irrevocably. Yet how many of us realize what we have become?

He said, painfully? The rest of the world knows by their destruction, knows us there by destruction, death, and that in for a very long time, our military has operated as a special interest, policy driven agency rather than one that is for the protection and defense of the American people. Think about the terror that we have brought to nations in your lifetime that can't be justified by self defense. Note the alliances so gloriously praised, falsely contrived by

the ruling elite to preclude war that guarantee across the board conflict. Where israelis on the beach of Normandy with us? Did you know where Ukraine was in a map before you cursed Russia? What did we have in common with Akuwaitis before we killed Iraqis? For them who surely contributed to the motivation behind terrorism on US soil? He well, this very process is now is how the citizen representatives are held accountable for when we kill overseas. Instead, these decisions

are made singularly by evildoers, senile old men and orange blowhards. Reflect on the terror that we have brought to nations in your lifetime. They cannot be justified in retrospect. The untold suffering that we wrought while we lived comfortably. Consider do you think that it is only anti fohon BLM who showed no respect for our founding fathers. These great men spoke eloquently to the horror of former alliances made at the whim of the elite. So let us not dishonor them

by murdering those who are not a direct threat to us. Establish for yourself some rules before you support bombs dropped on complete strangers. And of course are our rules established for people like Mike Johnson and for us as Christians. Whether the other people follow it or not, that's no excuse. As Michael did, Sylvia says, what are they doing in our name? Yeah, and so he says, if guilt or shame fails to restrain your lust for punishing

bad guys once again and a morass. We are not a party of to know this. Israel is supremely capable of taking care of itself. Our sugar daddy regard for that nation, long cultivated in us by the most powerful lobbies, ensure it a robust military without sound and formal reasoning. Like the Christian doctrine of just war. It is a moral and the worst way to enjoin that war, and that's what we've been doing for the last seventy years.

And I don't see any change coming from this speaker, who has been involved with one Christian cause after the other, I think are good causes, and yet he's not looking at what justifies a response. Again, a just war says, we don't go to war unless we have been attacked, and we have not been attacked. But we will be attacked if we continue doing this, if we continue to be the aggressor, if we continue to initiate this, if we continue to support both sides and most of these wars, we

will be attacked. And you know it may come from God as we reject him say well, I was just trying to make your prophecies as I understand them come true. Well, that isn't going to carry much weight. And part of this is not just initiating the war, but part of a just war is to try to avoid civilian casualties. And net and Yahu said, well, we did a really poor job. Yeah, I think everybody noticed

about that. And the other part of it that comes back to us and comes back to people like Speaker Johnson, is that we need to as part of a just war, seek to end the hostilities as soon as possible, not just try to avoid killing non combatants, but to try to end the war as soon as possible. I say, for today's broadcast, thank you for listening. The common Man. They created common Core and dumbed down our children. They created common past, track and control us. They're Commons project

to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they

want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at d davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. D Davidknightshow dot com. If you like the Eagles, Highway, the Cars, and Heuey Lewis in the news, they say the You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio download our app or listen now at APS radio dot com.