19Oct23 Govt Admits — Elites Given Jab Exemptions

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday, the nineteenth of October. You're of our Lord twenty twenty three. Well, today we will talk about what is happening with a hospital outrage across the world. It really doesn't matter what happened there. Everybody's going to believe what they want to believe as we see

different stories emerging about this. But the anger across Europe and other places tells us a great deal about what is happening that is far more important than what happened in the hospital. But we're not going to start with that. We're going to begin with lockdown fraud. And you know, as we're starting to peel back the layers like an onion of this fraud that was perpetrated on us,

it is getting more and more interesting as we peel these backs. So we're going to take a look at that, but we'll also take a look at what is happening with climate. Tony is going to be joining us today, Tony Arterban, and we'll also have Sheriff mac because the Southern Poverty Law Center has now decided that they are public enemy number one begging law enforcement to do something. Well, that's what the sheriff Mac's been begging law enforcement to

do, to follow the constitution. We'll be right back. Well, it's interesting to see as people are talking about the different layers of corruption, the different layers of fraud with the lockdown and the rest of this stuff, and understand that was one hundred percent really under Trump. It was the thing that Fauci, President Fauci got Trump to go along with. But it's interesting to see that the Trump media, like for example, WND, they always talk

about it in the abstract. You know, you'll see mainstream media say, well, COVID did this to us, and COVID did that to us. The alternative media because they didn't want to focus on COVID, you know, they kind of understand there was no real virus that was making people sick, killing people. It wasn't another nineteen eighteen flu like Trump keeps killing people. But they understand that's not the case. So what they'll say was this is pandemic. Did it to us pandemic? No, it's the rules of the

pandemic. The pandemic was a pandemic of tyranny, of psychological gaslighting and fear and the so called remedies. The medical martial law as I called it, and as I said, you know, Southern power law centers coming after Sheriff mac they came after me. They had, you know, because I called it medical martial law from the beginning, and that's what it was. So the headline pandemic unemployment fraud could reach mind boggling numbers. No, Trump unemployment

fraud could reach mind boggling numbers. We're talking about the PPP since from the very beginning, you know, paraphrasing Josie Wales outlaw, Josie Wales, don't PPP down my back and tell me it's raining or tell me there's a bug going around at any study from the Government Accountability Office made the amount of fraud

from the pandemic era. No, the Trump era, the Trump error error unemployment insurance programs is likely between one hundred billion and one hundred and thirty five billion, about eleven to fifteen percent of the total that they put out for this. COVID didn't do it to us. Yeah, the economy is suffering

from long Trump, not long COVID. And of course we have now unleashed the Biden variant of this as well, to follow up with the original long COVID from Trump, the long lockdown, the patterning for mark of the government, mark of the beast ID numbers, and the patterning for universal basic income welfare as they lock us down and take everything from us. That's what it

was about. The GOO found rampant waste abuse and fraud of the COVID nineteen era, the Trump error, and this fraud and this abuse was by design. I reported in the past. You know, just recently, within the last couple of months, a guy came out and he said, you know, I called him when I saw this thing, and I said he was somebody who had run programs like this before. I forget which administration he had been in, but he said, I called him up, and I said,

this is going to be rife with fraud. Do you understand there's absolutely no check or balance in this stuff. You're just going to be handing money out, will he know you? To people? They were not interested. He said. He kept calling people and the Trump administration see if anybody would talk to him. Now, finally he got somebody and they said, well, there hasn't been any fraud yet. He said, you haven't even started handing money out yet, talking about the same type of stuff that we saw

with the FDA. You know, you had as soon as someone with the Children's Health Defense Group saw they were going to be pegilating this mRNA stuf as bad as mRNA nanoparticles were and everything, they're gonna pagilated, and he called of and he said, you know, that's going to put a lot of people in anaphylactic shock. And so FJA said, well, well, we don't care. Call Pfiser see if they care. And of course Pfiser didn't care either. I mean they were warned, they knew, and it was

all by design. Quite frankly, I really don't think they're that stupid. And multiple people told them before during all of this stuff what was going on. They did it anyway. So it was meant to help those who are laid off due to the pandemic, says WND. You notice I just can't get past this, you know, misdirection that they have. No people were laid off due to the lockdown mandates of Trump and Fauci, and they were mandates. Let's not whitewash this for Trump. They will not mention Trump anywhere

in this article. They'll mention all of his programs. But it was the pandemic. It was COVID nineteen pandemic era. All the rest of this stuff makes me sick. And this is why this grifter keeps going. Using statistical modeling, GAO use this data sample to estimate that the total amount of fraud and pandemic unemployment insurance programs is between one hundred and one hundred and thirty five billion. Hey about a year of Ukraine. Not only were taxpayers defrauded of

billions, but the Department of Labor anticipated this. You see, they knew it was going to happen. They even awarded Rather than doing anything or listening to people who are warning them about fraud, what they said was, well, give give the States one and a half billion dollars to investigate the fraud

that we know we're going to create. And as they investigated and brought people and they have now recovered one point two billion, they haven't even recovered the cost of what was given out there anticipation of this fraud for the investigations less than the cost of the investigation. Since twenty eighteen, GEO made twenty six recommendations to the Department of Labor to prevent fraud and over payments, but so far sixteen of those have not yet been fully implemented. They implemented ten out

of twenty six. And that's over four years, two years of Trump and two years of Biden. Just in case you think there's a big difference between these guys, one of them is going to save us. The hundreds of billions of dollars are wasted and stolen between various pandemic relief programs. No Trump relief programs like the pay Check Protection Program PPP. The reality is is that PPP has always been an acronym for public private partnership, and this was a

public private partnership to screw everybody else in America. It was a government partner's a FDA partnered with Pfiser, Moderna got the Department of Labor partnering with the States and everybody else to defraud us, lock us down, put us on welfare. But most of the money going on fraud, economic injury, Disaster Loan program, the unemployment insurance. All this is added up to a significant part of the US debt. It will cost taxpayers for years to come as

we finance this at much higher interest rates. Not a surprise actually, because you know, Trump has always been known as the bankruptcy king. That's what he's going to do to this country. Kicked it off, you know, and now he set the press. One of the precedents that he set was they can spend you know, three four, five six trillion dollars a year. Who cares. COVID bailout of state and local governments was unnecessary, says Reason. No. Actually it was that necessary for the money. You know,

they're talking about the Biden money program. So this is not Trump. This is what Biden did in twenty twenty one, giving money to state and local governments who didn't need it. And we know that because they didn't spend it. And that's the whole point of the Reason article. But it wasn't necessary for Trump to give massive amounts of money in twenty twenty to the governments, to the governors personally, to the governors personally as part of their emergency,

to keep their emergency going. That was their bribe, just like they bribed hospitals with a twenty percent bonus and the awards. If you call somebody a COVID patient if you put them on a ventilator, if you give them this or that, plus we'll give you twenty percent bonus on everything that you do once you identify them. So you know, they would test people with the PCR tests before they give them any treatment as they're having a heart attack

and dying. The mercenary people. And so he did that with the governors. He gave them this money in twenty twenty. Trump gave it to them as their personal discretionary money. Brad Little a good example of it. And Idaho who kept this emergency going Republican governor or Republican legislature, and like he was some kind of British colonial governor, he suspended the legislature when they called

them. You know, this is all done in a year where most of the Republican states would meet every other year, you know, Texas, Idaho, they'd meet every other year. So they did this in an off year, so these people would have to call a special session. And so he shut down their call to do a special session and then produced some legislation to keep this stuff going and to push the vaccine and to punish people who didn't go through the mask and lockdown stuff and It was all because he had been

given an amount of money. I forget the exact multiple. It was three or four times the entire state budget was given to Governor bradllan Idaho by Trump in order to push the emergency, and it was his own personal discretionary funds. He could use this to buy political favors with anybody and everybody, and they all did so. Two years after authorize this hugely expensive bailout of state and local governments, a lot of the money's not even been spent, and

so as reason says, maybe it wasn't needed in the first place. States have only spent forty five percent of the funding that they got. Local jurisdictions have only spent thirty eight percent of the money they got. This is the two trillion dollar again, the Trump precedent, two trillion dollars. It was done in March of twenty twenty one. They didn't spend it because they don't need it, but it was necessary, very necessary in twenty twenty to get

the governors to go along with it. Now here's coming out of the UK. They're doing a much better job of exposing these frauds than we are in the United States. Of course, we had the exposure of Matt Hancock, who was there, their guy who was running all the lockdown stuff and everything. Remember that the guy who had to resign in shame after he was caught meeting a married woman having an affair with her I don't even like that word

adultery with her violation of all of his rules. And then they subsequently got his text messages and he's passing text messages back and forth, the people laughing about those people they put into quarantine, what they were doing to them, saying, man, what should we do next? You clearly can see from just that one guy who is their lockdown czar, the sheer hypocrisy, the cynical mocking of people who they had scared literally to death, and those who

were not afraid were being ruthlessly punished for violating these draconian rules. And so now they're looking at the guy they call Professor Lockdown. His name is Neil Ferguson. He was the architect of the lockdown. As a matter of fact, he was the architecture. He was used by Fauci and Trump to lock us down. It was he was the guy who did the model at the Imperial College of London. Oh, it sounds so impressive, doesn't it,

saying that everybody's going to die. As a matter of fact, Trump is still selling that lie in every interview where they challenge him on the vaccines. Look, this is a great Yeah. It was going to be millions of people who died if I didn't get the vaccine out there, and so you know, I saved everybody around the world. No, no, all of that is based on Professor Lockdown's failed climate model. Sounds like some kind of a children's fable, doesn't it. Yeah, it was kind of a children's

fable. Yeah, I expect role dall to do. You know. Anyway, they're now onto him. Professor Ferguson's terrifying March twenty twenty models warned that five hundred thousand Brits would die. Of course, it was many millions of Americans unless tougher action was taken a curve. The virus has spread. And as I've said many times, it's said very quickly, in his model, there was no curve. All this stuff about flattening the curve, right,

that is the model that it goes back to the early eighteen hundreds. As far as law, it gave us that bell shaped curve and they said, you know, whatever they saw whenever there was an epidemic that went through in any area, you know, whether it's cholera or typhus or smallpox, it always followed that bell shaped curve, and so we had to flatten the cave. Well. In his model, there was no curve. It was a straight line going up forever. Every person infected would infect another two point two

people or whatever the imaginary number was. Forever. Nothing was ever going to change it. And then it got even worse. The University of Edinburgh got ahold of his model and they started playing with it and they said, every time we run this, even if we have the same inputs, we get different answers. This is just garbage. Fifteen thousand lines of Fortran code, total garbage. It's a random number generator. So just pick the number that

you want and ship it to Boris Johnson and to Trump. They're stupid enough to follow through it. It spooked Boris Johnson and to adopting draconian restrictions and also Trump. But this is done. This is from the Daily Skeptic, and it's done from the perspective of UK And again they've got this guy and they're interrogating him now, Neil Ferguson, It's about time. So everybody was told they must stay home. Vaccines are the only safe route out of the

pandemic, and they're still months away from being deployed. And again, this is how we knew from the very beginning, because this is part of the modeling, part of the simulation, part of the germ games that the CIA and IH have been doing for twenty years, going back to the first one

two months before nine to eleven. So Professor Ferguson quit his role as a sage adviser two months after being caught breaking the social distancing rules to meet his married lover, just like Matt Hancock, both of these guys lying adulterers. Why look at Trump and his multiple marriages and how he treated his wives. It is something of a character issue, isn't it. If somebody will break their oath to their wife, if they'll lie, they are you can't trust

them. That We used to understand that as a country. It used to be important, and all these philandering presidents would have to keep their mistresses secret. They have no shame anymore. And the conservatives and the evangelicals just love Trump in spite of all that he's a man of no character, just like Matt Hancock and just like Lockdown, Professor Ferguson. So anyway, this is part of an inquiry. Now there's going to be information that comes out of

this stuff. But understand that these inquiries, these commissions to investigate are really there as part of a cover up. The nine to eleven Commission was there as a cover up. The JFK Assassination Commission was there as a cover up, the climate Gate Commission. That their inquiry that they had in the UK was there to cover it all up and to explain it away. And that

will be the outcome, the final outcome of all this stuff. But as we start to get these nuggets of truth, we have to understand none of these Matt Hancock and Ferguson, neither of them believed that any of this stuff was real. Neither of them believe that any of this stuff was true that they were telling people. Neither of them believe that any of this stuff was

necessary. Imperial College London, Professor Ferguson, Professor Lockdown said, I know I'm associated very much with this particular policy, but as you'll be aware from the evidence I've given him my statement. The reality is a lot more complex. This is like Paul interviewing Dick Lemine, who calls himself Rachel, who was a child psychologist, less time well, senator. The truth is very complex, and you know, and what is truth anyway? Right, that's

the only response you get from these people. I don't think I stepped over that line to say we need to do this now. What I tried to do was at times just step outside the scientific advisory role to try to focus on people, focus people's minds on what was going to happen, and on

the consequences of current trends, scaring people of death. In other words, their work suggested that five hundred thousand Brits would die if nothing was done to stop the spread of the virus, and there would be two hundred and fifty thousand deaths thirds of the people caught COVID, except that nobody died except from neglect, except from non treatment, except from the death protocols pushed in the hospitals of ventilators and remdesivir. That is a reality, the reality of what

happened. Now, this is interesting in New Zealand, where we had Jabsinda Arden. This is a very important story. It comes from the People's Voice, not TV, and I think it is out of well, I'm not sure where it is. The people's Voice, not TV. So spread this around. The New Zealand government exempted elite from the deadly COVID jab Now we all figured this out, right, we don't figure they get sebows right. Well, actually we've got the proof. They did what is called in America

a foya. Now they call it an ohya oh a same thing. And they got the documents from these people to show how they were granting vaccine exemptions to the elite. New Zealand's Ministry of Health granted vaccine exemptions to key staff while hypocritically rolling out the world's most draconian vaccine mandates and insisting that the public

be vaccinated. The hypocritical vaccine exemptions from the elite, says the People's Voice, were granted by former Prime Minister jab Sinda Arden's government before she stood down and accepted a new role at the World Economic Forum's Global Quote disinformations are that's

her her position. Now she's going to attack free speech. Arden's decision to allow the elite to refuse a vaccine while forcing the vaccine normal people was revealed by an Official Information Act OYA request dated second of August twenty twenty three, and it asked the question to the legislation at the time. In twenty twenty one, there were operational exemptions available for those who are not getting vaccinated against

COVID nineteen. Your website outlines the process were applying for an operated exemption under Clause twelve A. How many requests were received and how many were approved by the Ministry of Health. What an Orwellian I all that is? Oh? Yeah, the Ministry of Love where they have the police state inquiry, the Ministry of Truth where they send you the propaganda, and this is New Zealand's Ministry of Health. Well, they replied, and they said from the thirteenth

of November twenty twenty one to twenty six September twenty twenty two. And that's again after they approved give the emergency authorization for these untested vaccines. A total of four hundred and seventy eight applications for significant service disruption exemption were received.

One hundred and three applications were granted. Approximately eleven thousand and five workers Please note it's not possible to provide the exact number of workers covered by this, because it was possible for an organization to submit an application that would cover more than one worker. So they granted one hundred and three applications. They granted a you know, about one fifth of the applications that people asked for. It's just under five hundred, and they granted one hundred of them. But

that was eleven thousand people approximately. Now let's talk about how many people there are in New Zealand and how many government workers. I look at this up. Of course, the population of New Zealand is just over five million people, and they have fifty seven thousand, one hundred and forty nine government workers. And so these are public employees that were granted this exemption. And for the most part, because you know a lot of them are doctors, of

course, they're public employees government health here. So they're saying that about twenty percent of them were exempted. Of the government workers. Now, the other people who you can bet that the people are out there actually doing the work, did not get exempted. It's the people at the top. Guy Hatchett reports and says, I've made inquiries and found some staff prepared to leak information. One source has told me that ninety five consultants in the Dunedin region alone

benefited from vaccine exemptions. Another sources pointed to a group of doctors working in Northland who arranged among themselves to remain unvaccinated. That total appears to be hundreds and possibly more. It seems that those granted exemptions were restrained by gag orders. Gag orders. Right, I'm not going to just between us. You don't have to get this thing, but you're going to help us to push this, right, But you better not tell anybody about this. Yeah,

not the mask orders. These are gag orders. Everybody upset about Trump's gag orders. This ought to go global this story. Let's talk about the gag orders, About the people who were given exemptions and didn't have to get the vaccines. Even though they were crafting the policy and administering the vaccines to other people, they didn't have to get it themselves. That's the kind of gag order we ought to be. But everybody, you mean, Trump can't throw

personal insults to the people who are opposing him in court. Oh, the First Amendment is over now, Yeah, died under him. Actually uh, they could tell They cannot tell anyone that they had been granted exemptions. It was a secretive process that the Ministry of Health was anxious to hide from the public. Again the or weill In Ministry of Health. In any case, any doctor advising a patient that the mRNA vaccine might be risky faced disciplinary action,

and many of them were actually suspended. So medical staff allowed themselves to be manipulated into a position whereby if they were unvaccinated themselves, they were still

required to advise their patients to vaccinate. Wide spread hypocrisy, cynical, criminal hypocrisy, whatever happened to medical ethics, whatever happened to first do no harm gone, folks understand, the corporate hospital system, or the government hospital system as you see in New Zealand and most other countries, is hopelessly corrupt.

This process was certainly approved by doctor Ashley Bloomfield, who himself gained considerable notoriety by refusing vaccine exemptions to those among the public who had already been severely injured by the first shot. He said, Okay, I don't care that you were severely injured by the first shot. You survived, get another one, and he got an exemption or he approved these so, insisting that they continue

along with the vaccination schedule. Given doctor Bloomfield's close work with jab Sinda Arden and Chris Hipkins, it is quite likely that they were both aware of the process and approved it. The opposition leaders were also kept in the loop. So when you look at this video here of jab Sinda and she's never looked better with her horse face covered with a mask. It ought to be required for her at least, But you look at her getting this jab they put

out there for everybody. Do you believe that that's real? You believe that's a placebo I Do I believe that all of these people like Trump and Biden and jab Sinda Arden, I believe they were all posturing with all this stuff while they cynically poised and their own people. That's the reality. The criteria for granting exemptions apparently entailed an assessment concerning how vital staff were to the working

of the health department. Okay, so wouldn't you say, because this is the argument that they use for us well hospital people, you need to get it first, because you know you got to. If you don't get it, you're going to spread it. If you don't get the shot, you're going to spread this deadly virus. So the argument has been that's necessary for the health people to get it. But instead they looked at this and they said, well, wait a minute, how vital are our staff if it's

somebody that we think is really important. Not necessarily that they're necessary, but they've got good connections. If they're vital staff. This is an admission that they believe that this is very risky. Right, if it was necessary, safe and effective, you would give it to your vital staff first. The

same way we'll give them an exemption if we really need them. What's that tell you, Well, it tells you that they deliberately poisoned people, used people as lab rats, just as you know, Netnyahu can brag about that to World Economic form masters about how they're using their people for labrats for Pfizer, and of course these people did the same thing. How many ways do we need to cut this? You see these people using their people as an

experiment. You see other people saying, well, those of us who are important, we're not going to take it. We'll give it to the hoi poloi out there. Uh, senior officials and those holding key surgical positions could actually insist that they remain unvaccinated and continue to be allowed to work while there were brutal recriminations against anybody who warned the public, brutal recriminations against anybody else who didn't get it. So why did senior medical staff choose to remain unvaccinated?

Asks this article, Well, we all know because they're liars, are hypocrites, and their murderers for hire. They may have been made aware as this article of a twenty nineteen paper that was in the Frontiers of Oncology journal Cancer Journal that was titled gene therapy leaves a vicious cycle. You know, we're seeing that this stuff, there's all these different effects and how it doesn't stop. And this is what they said in the Journal of Oncology, gene

therapy leaves a vicious cycle. They said, gene therapy has been caught in a vicious cycle for nearly two decades owing to immune response, insertional mutagenesis, viral tropism, off target activity, unwanted clinical outcomes ranging from illness to death of participants, and from patchy regulations. For two decades, we haven't approved any of this stuff because it kills people, it mutates people, it causes cancer, it accelerates cancer, and on and on and on. They knew

it. They knew it, and now what is it. Now, that's the new race. We've got to have mRNA for everything. Got to put mRNA in your food, even injected into the animals, make food, reproduce all of this stuff. Look, this is one of the reasons why Moderna had been around for over a decade, and they had never had a market that came to never had a product that got to market. They existed off of all these fairy tale stories that they would tell people on Wall Street hopium.

They were selling opium on Wall Street and everybody so, oh, look we got this new drug and it's done these great trial and it does this and does that. Wow, that sounds amazing. That's going to be amazing. You can use this mr and A stuff and it's going to cure this and cure that. And yet when it would go to the trials, everybody said, well, you know, it's killing participants. We have all these unwonted clinical outcomes anything. So they never got anything approved until Trump in Operation

warps feed. Same story as rym des AVERR. You know, for years they said it destroys I think it's your liver. It destroys your body, destroys your organs, and it doesn't do anything. You tried to sell it with for age, you tried to sell it for ee bola. But then again, you know, with Trump and Fauci, they got it approved for the imaginary virus. Uh so, yeah, for two decades nobody did it. Incredibly against the evidence. The government in New Zealand, the government in

the United States still encouraging the public to get vaccinated. That's right. Uh two percent that people will do it too in the United States. And then there's this the twenty twenty three excess death data across different countries. Now this is very incriminating. So this is an excellent article. The People's they get it again, so I can tell it to you the People's Voice dot TV.

Okay. So what they did was they looked at the most highly vaccinated nations and the least vaccinated nations, and they looked at the excess death rate. And so the most highly vaccinated nations Portugal, Chile, Canada, Iceland, New Zealand, Spain, Australia, the average percentage of the population vaccinated,

with those nations ninety one percent. Their excess deaths so far this year this year twenty twenty three, twelve percent above the five year historical average twelve percent of people killed by that ninety one percent of people vaccinated, twelve percent more than the usual number of deaths. In the least COVID vaccinated nations the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Poland, Estonia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Switzerland,

the average percentage of the population vaccinated is only sixty three percent. Their rate of excess deaths so far in twenty twenty three is zero zero percent. And they point out in this that the insurance companies, the actuaries, insurance companies make a lot of money. They make a lot of money by predicting across the board how many people are going to die. They've got it down

to an exact science. And this is why it was such groundbreaking news when at the beginning of twenty twenty two we're told that that big insurance company out of Indiana won America. I think if I remember the name correctly, They said, we have seen something you wouldn't expect in hundreds of years. This

is more than three standard deviations away from the mean. The number of people who died, and it began in the third quarter of twenty twenty one, not during the so called pandemic, began when they rolled out of the vaccines, and then it continued on in the fourth quarter and so forth when everybody was getting vaccinated. And then he spends the CEO lies to you. He says, well, we were told that these were not COVID deaths, and yet I know they were. You know they were, you know, better

than the people who got the data. And he says, and furthermore, I also know that nobody's going to die if they get the vaccine. So these people I say died of COVID, and I say it was only the unvaccinated. So we're going to go up on the insurance rates of the unvaccinated. This is why I say this is a public private partnership to kill us all. And so zero percent and those least vaccinated, they get sixty three

percent of the people vaccinate, only zero percent excess deaths. And the place is where they got ninety one percent of the population vaccinated, twelve percent excess death twelve percent over the usual. Yeah, what does that tell us it tells us that the father of the jab, Trump, who calls himself the father of the vaccine, is a mass murderer and he's our most popular politician. Yeah, it's just like going to China and seeing all of these posters

of Mao. We'll never get over it. We'll never get it'll never change. Trump will always be a hero. When he dies, he will have been assassinated by the deep state and the globalist except he was for them. You know, Mao killed probably one hundred million of his own people unnecessarily deliberately for power. You know, you could try to make an excuse and say, well, he just didn't know this, you know what he was doing with a great leap forward and sending everybody out in the fields who didn't know

anything about growing stuff, And no, it was deliberate. And they still worship him, and Trump will still be worshiped. With all this stuff. And the Pfizer trial, the unvaccinated control group were all vaccinated after just a couple of months to make sure that nobody saw any long term effects. But even though they vaccinated him before they vaccinated people, they saw a huge difference in people who had very severe outcomes or death because of that. This is

why they're exposed to fraud. And perhaps we will start to spell fraud with a P in front of it, like we spell Pfizer with a P in front of it. So, according to the OECD, there were one point two million excess deaths in twenty twenty two, to give you a starter figure about what Trump killed, because that's not even counting the hospital death protocols of twenty twenty and so the take on this is one thing that I'm concerned about

with this article. I say, now it's becoming accepted that both COVID and COVID vaccinations begin their lives in a biotech lab. It doesn't seem to matter much what proportion of excess deaths are due to covid and what are due to covid vaccination. Why I disagree with that. We must not, by this gain of function lie about That is a tactic that is being used by all

the mainstream media. It's being used by these politicians, these cynical murdering politicians, being used by them as an excuse for the vaccine industry and to target China, the WU flu, the China flu. This then, right, is to help to generate anger about China. No, we were shot and killed by our own government. And I began the show today with this because I want you to understand. As they push us further and further into war, they want us to take a side. You understand, these people kill

their own people. Netan Yahoo killed his own people. Guy who's pushing this war, You trust him with a this stuff? You trust any of these narratives coming out, even about this hospital thing. I don't. Don't trust these people. Don't follow them, don't fall into their pattern of fear. They had us, had people killing themselves three years ago, two years ago, and now they want you to do it again, this four D chest

stuff. And it's the alternative media that's pushing it as well. Oh, they're pushing this this lab stuff really hard, really hard, which is a way to excuse these people. Well, you know this lab thing, it was so dangerous. We had to do something. Yeah, we made some mistakes because we rushed it, but we had to rush it because the lab stuff from China was so dangerous. No, No, that was a lie. You killed people with your hospital death protocols for something that wasn't dangerous.

Tell people to go home, come back when you're really sick, and then we'll put you on a ventilator and we'll give you rim Dezevir. Not going to give you any treatment. We're going to withhold back. We're going to we're going to take people's licenses if they give you a droxychlora clintor ivermectinary this stuff. So again, what are their motivations of these ministries of health and

these politicians who do this to us? Well, I don't worry. We just need to fight over Trump and over Biden, because you know they both killed us, but one of them, Trump is going to save us. Thank you on Rockman, Brandon Bennett, thank you very much for the tip on Rumble Brave's Girl. Thank you. Also, have you thought about asking author William Forsschin, who wrote the One Second After series, to come on your show. I'll look that up. I'm not familiar with either one of

those, but thank you for the tip on Rumble. I'm wondering One Second After was that an e MP thing or something. I'm not sure Rumble be Slice, thank you very much for the tip. Hi. David was just in South Dakota for a fishing trip, drove by a house with a huge sign saying only God and Trump can save us. The brainwashing is real, Yeah it is. Yeah, I'm surprised that they don't put Trump first.

You know, God is Trump's copilot right now. Jesus is my savior, not the guy who jabbed us right jabs Javis is going to save us. All Rock fan defund the politics. I agree with that. Thank you very much for the tip. David Travis loved the show. Keep speaking truth, Well, thank you very much. So we and I just got a message that Tony can't do the interview today where there's something happening with construction very loud outside where he's got a studio set up. But we still will have planning

on having a sheriff Mac join us. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. You are listening to the David Knight Show. Well, let's talk about some things you already know. Walmart is spying on ozimpic patients shopping habits and finds that they're buying less food. So let's think about this. You know, they don't think that we know, but we do know, don't We have that processed food is designed to be addictive that

ozimpic is designed to suppress appetite. What a surprise for the Walmart people. But as part of this, we learned that, of course Walmart is spying on you, but we knew that as well too. They think you don't know, but you do. As Bloomberg reports, a Walmart executive admitted that the company has been looking at anonymized customer data, yeah right, finding that shoppers taking the diabetes drug and its weight loss management counterpart, wegavy, are

buying less food. We do see a slight pullback, and overall basket is the way he puts it. An overall basket. So some gluetide works by mimicking the natural intestinal hormone, which alerts the brain to stomach fullness and essentially sends signals to stop you from being hungry. So what a surprise that they would find this out right. The problem is that it also has some adverse

effects, which we also all know. You can lose interest in food, you can have intestinal blockage, or the worst case scenario, you can have stomach paralysis. What is that, Well, it's the stomach muscles gradually starting to atrophy and you're just kind of locking up and they're no longer moving anything, and it causes unbelievable pain and cramping and many other more serious things. That makes people who have taken it and talked about their side effects. When

women said this, I wish I had never seen this stuff. It made my life absolute hell, and it has cost me so much money to get treatment for this. Another woman who is a teacher said I had to quit my job because I just kept vomiting all the time. So you know, there's that talking about pharmaceutical drugs there. The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this week that investors behind Campbell's soup and the makers of slim Gym meat sticks are

already asking tough questions about the companies that they own a stake in. Stakeholders are asking this, how are you going to deal with these drugs that kill people's appetites. Bloomberg reported that the CEO of a Kellogg subsidiary that makes cheese its and pringles is quote by no means complacent as the drugs potential to cut into this company's profit margins grows. So New data suggests that of whopping one

point seven percent of Americans have already been prescribed semaglutide drugs. It's about the number of people. It's almost the number of people still taking these boosters. I guess you can always find people who are going to take this stuff. And look, you know, for some people it's worked, and you know, you can have very serious issues with diabetes and weight issues like that. I understand that. I'm just saying, better understand the downsides of this,

and we'll talk about that a little bit more. But first of all, from the business standpoint, the Walmart CEO said that because the retailer sells ozimpic and wegabe through its pharmacies, it actually has seen a boost in revenue even as they're losing money on the drugs and as the expensive drug continues to be

massively prescribed. So I understand they make more money on junk drugs than they do on junk food at Walmart. Because when we look at one of the side effects that people are not talking about too much, as links to suicide from this drug. And I look at this and it's like, why do so ma see this so often? Why do so many non psychoactive drugs? Why is so many of them? You know, you look at SSRI and it's like, well, that's supposed to affect people's moods and things like this.

It's given by prescribed by psychiatrists and stuff for that purpose, so you could expect that, well, maybe it's going to give people suicidal ideation, which it does and tris many people to suicide and very dangerous drug. But you're look at that this is a diet drug, an appetite suppressor. Why is this causing people to commit suicide or suicidal ideation. It's amazing to me

how many of these pharmaceutical products make people want to kill themselves. And I'm not talking about people wanting to kill themselves because of the health issues that these pharmaceutical drugs due to people. The FDA's received hundreds of reports of suicidal thoughts and depression from patients on weight loss medications since twenty ten, as well as

thirty six deaths by suicide or suspected suicide. A significant number occurred shortly after starting the drugs or upping those dosage, only to subside when the patients stopped taking them. And so they're saying, well, this is a very small number of people that are out there, but look where there's smoke there's fire. We've heard this type of story over and over again. It's rare.

You know, we got blood clots here, but it's rare. Right now, I'm I wanted to tell people about this because it may not be so rare. Doctor Eric Turner, who used to work for the FDA, said the many patients stopped suffering suicidal thoughts when they came off of the drug, making it hard to explain away the suicideal Tea, that's what he That's actually the word they used. So it's drugs like wegg of eozimpic mon jarro made

by Eli Lilly. If I'm pronouncing these made up names correctly. And so some people are saying, well, we want to have a warning for suicide. The black label that Kim Wo's sick that I talked to remember her name correctly. I think it's watsick or something. She fought for you to get that done. Finally got it done for SSRIs. Clearly an issue with that. Thousands of documented cases now with that, but that's it took a while for them to get that out there. But they're still selling it. But

it does have a black label on it. And so Kim went to she is on a consumer representative on their FDA panels and everything, and she's pushing very hard against this stuff, and they keep approving these things. With these

drugs, you go weekly and you get an injection. So one fifty three year old mother of four from Ohio, Miss Heidelbah, revealed that she started taking the drug every Sunday and that by Tuesday, she said, she would feel lethargic, depressed, and at times suicidal, believing her family would be better without her. The symptoms would persist for a few days, she said, and then returned shortly after her next injection. They only didn't appear when

she skipped a dose. She had no history of depression anything else like that, She said, I knew it was the drug. Another patient, Sarah Sobol, forty years old from Buffalo, New York, revealed how it had left her with panic attacks, hallucinations, suicidal thoughts, same stuff that the SSRI things did the people. She had begun to take it in twenty twenty one for weight loss, but stopped after these side effects appear. She said, if somebody had said this is a side effect, you're not losing your

mind, it really would have helped me. I thought I would end up in a psych ward. I was terrified I would not be normal again. Ever. A third patient, Lisa would twenty two, who lost seventy pounds from the drug, said she also had suicidal thoughts while on it. I was driving and I thought, what if I just jerk the wheel on this bridge. It didn't occur to me that it was Weggaby. It reminds me

of this that Hen and her sisters I think it was. And it's a Woody Allen film and it had Christopher Walking in it when he's pretty young, and and Woody Allen is in the seat next to him, and Christopher Walking character is driving and he's saying, you know, you ever thought about what it would be like just to jerk the wheel and hit this? And he's like, what get me out of here? Anyway, Sorry, that's off off the side anyway. Fourth patient, only gave her first name, said

she also had suicidal thoughts while on Weggavy. She repeatedly visualized shooting herself. She's a nurse, she said. One evening, the symptoms became so bad she went to the er and they gave her anxiety medications and the doctor told her, you're a mom, this happens when you get overtired. Well, there you go. So you should have aboorded these kids. That's the problem.

It's not the pharmaceutical drugs. Several users also raise concerns on social media, saying that they were feeling hollow and as though they rarely anything makes me happy. They said, So we've seen this, they said before. In two thousand and eight, Sonofie's Accompania weight loss drug was withdrawn in Europe after

being linked to suicidal thoughts. It was never approved in the US. The weight loss drug Contravy carries a black box warning SSRIs about suicidal thinking, and another obesity medicine, q Simia, also has a warning telling patients to stop taking it if they experienced suicidal thoughts. Well, maybe we should put black labels on the pringles and their junk food stuff and say, you know, you might wind up being obese and go down this path and taking a drug

and suicidal. But it may also be a kind of a form of suicide as we can't control our addiction to these things. You know, they're highly addictive, and they've made they've designed the food, the drunk food, to be highly addictive. I remember my grandfather before drunk food even got popular. He died before I was five years old. But and I don't remember him saying this, but my mom told me. She said he said, most people, a lot of people will dig their grave with a knife and a

fork. And you know, we should think about what we eat. Definitely should. Anyway, some other things that you probably also knew, but other people have now just shown. Six months ago, MPR left Twitter. They were angry with Elon Musk and his label of it being essentially a propaganda organization, which it is, and so they said the effects have been negligible. They said Twitter was not worth the effort. It certainly isn't worth the effort

for me. And of course now Elon Musk is talking about charging people by the tweet if you don't pay subscription for a monthly thing. He's going to start it and do a test case, he said, in some small countries. But if you don't pay it on a monthly basis, then he'll charge your per tweet like a buck per tweet or something. Who's going to use that. They essentially got what they wanted. They arranged an advertiser boycott. He's losing a lot of money, so he looks at other ways to make

the money back and put it on user fees. I don't think it's a viable model, but it's certainly regardless of all that, it's not been a viable model for me. For five years. I've been censored, I've been shadow band. It is absolutely useless for me to do any work on social media, and as I will post up videos that we do, but I'm not really interested in interacting with people or pushing any news out on social media.

I just think it's a waste of time. Definitely waste of time for me, And even NPR said it was a waste of time for them. Six months later, they said, we can see the effects of leaving Twitter have been negligible. A memo circulate at MPR staff says traffic has dropped by only one percent as a result of leaving Twitter. Now officially, and let me just say this, since I don't do anything on social media, it's

worthless for me to try to do it. If I'm even allowed on the platform, if you could, like even on the platforms where you watch it, if you could like the broadcast, if it's on a video platform, if it's on an audio podcast platform. If you could like it, if you could share it, if your friends see that type of thing, that would help us a great deal. That'd be far more effective than anything I could do. And if you don't like it that much to share it,

then maybe we shouldn't be doing it anyway. Netflix is going to open up brick and more locations. You're gonna say, I didn't see this coming. This is really bizarre. Before I get into that, though, let me respond to some of the people left comments and tips as well. Thank you. On rock Fan MJ. Nichols, thank you for the tip. Reading one second after right now halfway through. It appears to be a good book. It's the first in a series of three or four, I believe.

Again, I don't know what that is. Is that a emp or something like that? On Rock Fann Michael Palmroy, thank you for the tip, he said, Good morning, David. Everyone needs to revisit hour three yesterday on eighteenth of October, the interview with George Barne was not just usual great, but spectacular with thank you. I thought it was very interesting. This

is a guy who has a wealth of information. He is the most quoted person in terms of giving people a pulse as to what is happening with Christians in the church and people's beliefs and worldviews in general in the society. He founded the Barne Group. He's now with Arizona Christian University or something, and he's got another organization that he's set up. But he's been watching this stuff for decades and he summarized the findings that he had in this latest book.

So I'd highly recommend his book as well. But yeah, do check out that interview. He's a fascinating person and he's got a lot of experience and a lot of wisdom about this stuff. On rock Fan, Dougalog thank you very much for the tip. He says, the term zion has forever referred to the city of David, adjacent to the Temple Mount, also known as the City of God. A Zionist would be someone who believes God, but

the term has been bastardized by the enemies of God. Is just another way Satan is tearing down the name of God and Christianity and the people of God. Thank you, David. Yeah, and you know when I okay, Travis, but now one second after is an emp novel. Okay, but getting back to Dougalalug's comment, That's why I'm not going to get into this. I'm not going to get into the end Times theology the rest of this

stuff. I would just point out to people that, you know, it's not just the Palestinians, but in our country, in our country, we don't have a significant Palestinian presence yet if people want to change this, but we see what has happened in different countries, but there has been a significant Palestinian presence. We see what happened in Lebanon, for example, destroyed that formerly prosperous, mostly Christian nation, and it's why that the other Arab nations

don't want them. And this is not this is not racism, and it's just a characteristic of their culture, their religion, whatever you want to look at it as. But I understand that in our country, the same attitude of calling Americans colonizers is rooted and everything these Marxists and colleges and other places are doing, it's why they've got this knee jerk reaction to anything happens in

the Middle East. That's the other side of this, And so I have said that regardless, you know, I come at it from a biblical worldview. People have different eschatologies is what they think is happening with us. But I don't you know, I've said to people, I said, you know, when you look at well what you believe about Israel or what you believe about the end of the world, it's a big mistake to try to make that happen. God will make that happen. And so we have Christians who

believe that they're, you know, in the pre tribulation rapture. So they would love to see a situation where they don't have to go through some great tribulation and they don't have to die. They'd love to get just raptured out of here, you know. And so they would those people, many of them will kind of take the attitude. I've talked to many of them myself. You just see what this says. Oh yeah, just the end of the world. It's great, where Raptor's coming soon. It's like, no,

you have to oppose this. You're here now, and you have to oppose tyranny and justice to your fellow man and all the rest of this stuff. God has not told us exactly when or how He's going to do any of this stuff, And so, but he has told us what he wants you to do. He wants you to defend the widow, help the orphans.

He wants you to fight in justice, to stop the exploitation of your fellow man, and to follow Christ in many other ways, right, and not just those social things, and there's many other things that you need to do. You know, be a witness for Christ, no matter what the social consequences are. And so that's your revealed will of God. You know, based on your eschatology or whatever you believe is going to happen. You don't know the timing of that. Then you don't know exactly how this is

going to be accomplished. And I use example of a who God told him you're going to be the father of many nations. And that's gonna say if he's old, Sarah's old, and so he decides he's going to take it into his own hands because nothing's happening. I'm getting older, you know, I believe God's going to do this. Oh yeah, God's going to do this, but maybe he needs my help. God doesn't need your help. And just look at the story of Ishmael and Hagar and how Abraham took it

into his own hands, and so we don't do that. I know what I'm supposed to do, regardless of whether or not the world ends tomorrow or not. And i know what I'm supposed to do whether whatever God is going to do with Israel. And that doesn't give anybody a free pass to murder people or to harm people. It doesn't give a free pass to any government. Regardless of what your theology is. You got some clear direction about this, and that's why we put the principles of a just war. That's why

we oppose terrorism, whether it's done by individuals or by a state. Because God doesn't need our help, He needs our obedience and all of this stuff. So let's talk a little bit it. We'll take a break and then we'll come back and we'll talk about what is happening in some of this other news that some things that you already no. I guess we could put it that way. We'll be right back. You're listening to the David Knight Show on Rockvin Real McCoy, thank you for the tip, he says, while

fantastic coverage of the People's Voice article, they do great videos. Well, it explains why People's Voice dot tv I did not know that. I'll take a look at them as a source in the future. It was a great article, but he says, I can't wait to share the clip of your show about this deadly fraud. Well, thank you very much. We'll make that a clip today and we'll put that out on the video channels as a

clip. Again. I was interested when I saw this Netflix thing about opening brick and mortar locations, and this is something that is kind of a personal interest looking at this, which I thought was kind of We used to have video stores. It got started in it and the mid nineteen eighties, after there was a Supreme Court case. The movie studios didn't want their videos rented.

And if you remember in the early days, you know, when you would go to Beta Barn before it became VHS Village, that you would have to pay a large amount for a membership fee, and they were doing that kind of stuff to try to get around these restrictions. You know, it was a profit center and they charged a lot to rent these things. The tapes are very expensive. But you know, they were doing this membership thing in the same way that people have to do the membership thing in order to

get raw milk and stuff like that, you know. And so anyway, there was a Supreme Court case and it was a doctrine of first sale, and what they said was, well, which you sell this to somebody, you don't have any authority about what they're going to do with it, and so they can rent it if they want to. And that opened up the gates because what happened was their response then was to raise the price even higher and then also released their catalog. And that was when we got interested in

it. And I was going to do a point of sale thing. That's how we originally got into it. And so I wrote a point of sale thing that worked on the Macintosh, which was still early, and it also just come out with their first hard drive, which had five megabytes of storage. But I figured a way to cram all that stuff in there. And it wasn't long before those hard drive rates started going up, you know, within a year it was up to ten megabytes woo. But I could keep

I had to write my own database in it. Anyway. The bottom line was that the brick and mortar stores went away, largely to what Netflix was doing now. The studios always a posted the studios even though they made money hand over fist. And even though they were able to come up with new animated films on a regular basis, and you know, they they never had a failure on that model. It could fail in the in the video, in the theatrical release, but it make a lot of money on video.

Good example of that was a Terminator series. Terminator was a complete failure, James Cameron's first Terminator. It got discovered on video and became a huge franchise. But you know, because if we saw something was good, we'd tell people about it, you know, and and that carried a lot of weight. But anyway, so they decided that they were going to stop. They wanted to have a model where they participate in every transaction, and so they

came up with pay per view, where you pay for each view. That's what they wanted to have. And so they came up with a model where they rented the stuff to the stores, and that was what Blockbuster and Hollywood Video went with. As a small video place. We didn't do that. Instead, what we went was really deep in catalog and because that was interested in the old movies anyway, and so you know, we were okay with

that. But you know, Netflix. We always knew that they were planning to do this video on demands what they called it then now they call it streaming. Had a lot of customers who worked for They worked for I can't remember the name of the company. It was a Canadian telecom company and they said, you know, we've got pictures of your store and other stores and

said we're going to replace them. And they were doing these video and demand experiments where they would go to a community and they would set up direct lines to different houses and they would have somebody sitting in this little check and as people that have a list of videos that they could watch, and they had them all on cassette and if somebody ordered this thing, they would put it in the VCR and pipe it to them just to see, just to monitor

what people's spending habits were going to be. They liked that a lot, and so we knew that it was just a matter of time until bandwidth got there, and you know, the brick and mortar thing was going to disappear. And you know, it's one of the reasons why when we sold the place, I you know, I took all the money and put it into the people who were going to be making the tools for the Internet, the

switching circuits and the electronics and stuff like that. You know, kind of like instead of investing in a particular company, you invest in the and the tools. Like the people the gold Rush, they invested in the people made a lot of money with the people who sold the picks and the axes, more so than the prospectors who went out there. So I thought that was going to be a safe thing. And you know, it's just a lesson that. And then we had the dot com bust, which took down the

tech companies as well, and so your timing has to be right. It's not enough just to see trends, as I can tell you from personal experience with all this stuff. But anyway, everybody say, what are they gonna do? Are they gonna sell DVDs? I thought, well, that's kind of interesting, because I really do prefer I still prefer the quality and the

supplemental content of physical media like that. But I don't know that most people are looking at this and say that nobody knows what they're going to do with these stores. We're going to do two of them experimentally. They think maybe it's going to be some kind of a merchandising type of thing like Disney has done in their Disney stores. But I don't really know, since they don't have a lot of well known characters, how they're going to make that operate.

So again, when you it's it is kind of interesting because even though the studios were going to try to shut everything down with video and demand, it was really Netflix that got there first by shipping out the the DVDs by mail, even before they got to the streaming stuff. So but anyway, I just thought that was an interesting story. This is something you also knew long time ago, the fact that the CIA was lying to you, the fact that you got Leon Panetta lying to people. He said, no regrets.

That's former CIA director Leon Panetta in an interview with Fox's Brett bar Interesting. It was up on DRUDG yesterday Brett bar Is selling his house in Washington, d C. For record amount of money thirty two million dollars. I wonder where they're paying this guy at Fox News. I'm in the wrong network here. Oh wait, I'm not in a network. I guess that's part. Panetta humiliated himself as he defended the letter that he and fifty others so

called intelligence officials signed suggesting that Hunter biden laptop was Russian disinformation. Yeah, Brett Bar, the guy who is the raiz your hand debate monitor, you know, that's what he did the very first debate that Trump was in, Raise your hand if you'd support the other candidates. And he didn't raise his hand, And of course he did it again and DeSantis called him out. And they've done that in the first two debates. Raise your hand, who

would you vote off the island? Raise your hand if this that? And DeSantis has called him out on it both times and said, just stop this. We're not in school. You know, this is very disrespectful to people. We came here to talk about issues that Brett Bear. They pay him so much money. He's got a thirty two million dollar home. I guess you know he'll ask the questions the other one asked. But he asked him. Brett Bear said the letter that was using the debate. He said,

I haven't asked you this, but do you have regrets about that? Now looking back, knowing what you now know, just raise your hand if you regret this. And Panda did not raise his hand. He does not regret. He says, well, frankly, I haven't seen any evidence from any intelligence agency that this was not the case. So Bear says, you don't think that was real? And he says, I think that disinformation is involved here. I think Russian disinformation is part of what we're seeing everywhere. Finally

asked him if he had any regrets over how to handle the story. No, I don't have any regrets about not trusting Russians. And you see, you know, when you look at this, of course, the CIA has always been about lies. The FBI agent that I interviewed, it's been decades now. He said, you know, it was embarrassing when we would go to other countries and the CIA was there, and they would come in and

they would just lie when they didn't need to lie. They would just make stuff up all the time and lie to the officials in this other country, the embassy official, and everybody knew they were lying. They didn't care. See, from that standpoint, Leon Panetta is exactly the kind of guy they're looking for. Jonathan Turley pointed out a couple of points here that Panetta refuses to acknowledge. Number One, American intelligence quickly debunked the claim and said there

was no evidence of Russian disinformation behind the laptop. Number two, the emails contained in the laptop were quickly authenticated by other parties. Number three, the FBI authenticated the laptop. Umber four Hunter Biden has since sued over the use of his laptop. And the last one here, the media has independently authenticated the laptop. This is the man in charge of our CIA, and Brettbaar doesn't challenge him on any of those five points. I don't know. That's

why they pay him the big bucks. I guess because he won't challenge him on these points. But all the CIA does is line. Of course, the big liar who lied US into the Iraq war weapons of mass destruction based on terror. Gene Haspell was promoted by Trump to be the head of the CIA, of course, eminently qualified. Bablin Bee has declared Dylan mulvaney Man of the Year. I haven't covered this. This is a last week it came out because you had an LGBT magazine in the UK declared Dylan mulvaney Woman

of the Year. Well, babylon Bee calls him man of the Year. They said it's time once again to honor one man who's gone above and beyond to advance the cause of men and raise the bar for what other men seek

to accomplish. The Babylon Bee has chosen Dylan Mulvany to receive the twenty twenty three Man of the Year award because you know who else could get a woman to fall on their knees and worship them this day and age, right as we saw done by Drew Barrymore to Dylan mulvniy the first time ever saw him. And you know, if you can get a woman to humiliate herself like that where you must have some really powerful male stuff going there. I guess

I don't know. Mulvaney's true courage comes from taking the initiative to live within a world of his own imagination and then to stubbornly stay there with a will and determination that surpasses most other men. Now, the Babylon Bee congratulates Dylan mulvaney being on his biggest year, Yet, much like Bud Light, Mulvany can only go up from here. Yeah. Well, here's a story that is difficult to believe. More difficult to believe than that dol mullenious a woman.

And this is the fact that this guy got seven months in jail for a meme and they came after him who sent uced yesterday When they came after him, it was a meme that was making fun of Hillary going back to the twenty sixteen election, Trump versus Hillary, and they used a statute that

could have resulted in him getting ten years in jail. It is a statute that is designed to stop people from interfering in elections, you know, kind of like the KKK and has done in the past, or physically blocking things and things like that, like the Black Panthers did in Chicago, remember that where they showed up and they scared people away from the polls. Of course they were never charged with anything. Instead, this guy was charged for putting

this up. And it's like hashtag I'm with her, hashtag go Hillary, And he puts a meme there avoid the line vote from home text Hillary two five nine nine two five and vote for Hillary and be a part of history and so forth and so on. Now, first of all, this is a satire. Nobody really believes that they can vote from home, and it was a satire that was really done by the other side as well. Take

a look at this. This is a video that's put up by somebody wearing a MAGA cap and saying, hey, Trump voters, skip the poll lines and text in your vote texts are legit or vote tomorrow on Super Wednesday. Same thing, same thing, except she was a lot more explicit in terms of disinformation about voters. Well, they did nothing to her instead. The guy who did the Trump meme it is going to jail for seven months.

His name is Doug Mackie. Sentenced in New York City and a sham court because you know, as we say in New York City over and over again, sham and everything they do. But of course you knew that, didn't you. Also, you know, if someone's dumb enough to fall for this, I think it's okay if we just kind of get their vote out of the system. It's a triaje. Yeah, any vote that gets siphoned off

by this was a vote we didn't need as an intelligence triage. Yeah, but this is the Webinari's political system that we now say, especially in New York, a real travesty, if ever there was one. We're going to take a quick break and when we come back, we're going to talk about a Soros district attorney getting his come up and can you get those of his own policies. We'll be right back analyzing the globalist next move and now the Deep and Nut Show. All right, welcome back and on rock Fan.

Richard Williams, thank you very much for the tip. He says, we can shout Maratha until our last breath, as many saints have done, or we can focus on what God has before us now and trust him for our future. I agree with that. Thank you, rock Fan. Thank you, Eric, appreciate that tip. That's very kind. Thank you. Well, let's talk about what happened to a district attorney in New Orleans. This guy was elected with a lot of sorrows money and he's been one of these

people who doesn't like bail. The guy just last couple of days. I guess it was on Monday, I think, or I can't remember what day it was now it's so much stuff here I can But anyway, we talked about bail and the importance of bail, and about not just catching criminals and releasing them again on the street. But that is his policy. He doesn't want to keep lock these people up, and so he got carjacked at gunpoint. There in New Orleans, the New Orleans District Attorney Jason Williams, the

Soros district attorney. He was walking his seventy eight year old mother to her car when two suspects approached. The pair pointed a gun at them and demanded his car. The suspects then jumped in the car drove off before abandoning the vehicle and undisclosed location and carjacking a young woman in her area thirty minutes later. So the New Orleans Police Department, and I guess you know, when they caught these guys, this district attorney probably just turned him right out on

the street. I mean, not only is getting hoisted by his own batard, his own policies too, but he probably didn't do anything to these people either. He was elected in twenty twenty after Soros donated two hundred twenty thousand dollars to the Louisiana Justice and Public Safety Pack to run campaigns against his opponent. He ran on a platform of social justice, promising to find alternatives to incarceration. There's an alternative incarceration, getting your own car carjacked, that's the

alternative to incarceration. He's not learned that the hard way, But he hasn't learned his lesson. Maybe I don't know what the voters have and to reform the ineffective and unfair money bail system. According to his campaign website, now two hundred and twenty thousand dollars is not even a lot of money for George Soros. He has spent millions in some of these local district attorney races that in San Antonio and other places like that. But again, how long will

it take for people to learn what is going on? And the most effective way that anybody can campaign against this kind of Soros money is to point out that their opponent is being funded by Soros for this stuff. Because it's hard to get people to understand why we need to have a money bail system and why social justice reform is destroying places like San Francisco and now New Orleans and other places like that. Even the district attorney gets carjacked. Let's take a

look at what is happening. You know, as to point out, we talked about this, you know, even the January sixth people, when the guy with bail, I said, you know, these guys, many of them have been given decades in jail and they had to wait two or three years for their trial. They said, yeah, you look at how this has changed. You know, average is sixty days in jail when they had the money bail system, and now the averages like three hundred and sixty days

or something like that. Just amazing two years average, I think in South Carolina, one of the states we're talking about. And because the alternative is you just either if you don't have the money bail system, you just immediately release people, or you just keep them in jail until their trial, and it's very difficult to get a speedy trial anymore. Williams declined to prosecute sixty

five percent of all criminal cases in New Orleans in twenty twenty one. The DA still continues to prosecute, on average, only forty four percent of the

criminals who have been charged by the police. So when we look at what has happened to the Jay Sixers, as a matter of fact, the outrageous the trials, the punishments that many people have been given, especially people like Joe Biggs with the Proud Boys, seventeen years the prosecutors asked for thirty three years, And in general, what the judge was doing was giving about half of the draconian sentences demanded by the prosecutors, and they were still draconian.

They were still excessive punishment far you know, even half of what these people demanded was excessive. But now the Department of Justice has appealed the sentencing. I still don't see any evidence that the you know, the Proud Boys, or any of the JA sixers who've been given these excessive punishments. I don't see that they have filed any appeals. But the Department of Justice has filed

an appeal to get the sentences increased. It's absolutely amazing. And so they're going to appeal this again because they only got half of what they wanted. You know, Joe Biggs, they won him for thirty three years, they only got seventeen, so they want to go for all thirty three. They

filed notice of appeal papers on Monday. Along with the four Proud Boy members convicted of seditious conspiracy, they are also appealing the sentencing of Dominic Pizzola and another Proud Boy member who was convicted on different charges and sentenced to ten years in prison. The response from Norm Pattis, who is defending Biggs and others said Attorney General Merrick Garland needs to get a new hobby horse. He said, this appeal is ridiculous. Every part of this is ridiculous. I do

hope that they appeal the sentence to the Supreme Court. It must be appealed. Frankly, as we'll be talking later about the push to bring in more Palestinians, if they're going to be pushed out of Gaza, let's bring them to America, say many people. Well, Biden's border security. He's got one group of people, as we know, that he doesn't want, and those are Christian refugees, one segment of society that is feeling the full brunt

of borders security persecuted Christians. A report shows that Joe Biden White House has cut the resettlement of Christians fleeing persecution around the globe by seventy percent compared to twenty and sixteen. And a good example this is this German family who's been here since two thousand and five or twenty sixteen. They even have two children who were born here. The anchor baby thing doesn't apply to them. Refugee

status doesn't apply them and their genuine refugees. They did not want to send because their religious beliefs did not want to send their kids to a German school. Doesn't matter whether you agree with them, that's their religious belief and the German government was going had fines against them that were greater than their entire income. That's religious persecution. And they have not been given full residency under George W. Bush, under Obama, under Trump, and then under Biden he

decided that he wanted to deport them. They've now been given another year extension, but they've just been doing lists living by, you know, one year at a time. Extension Open Doors, which annually ranks fifty countries it says are the most difficult to live in as a Christian and World Relief, A global Christian humanitarian organization issued a joint report in September that in twenty twenty two, the US government resettled barely one third of the number of Christian refugees who

were granted asylum in twenty sixteen. Sounds like they got a problem with Christians. And remember this when people start pushing you to bring in other groups from other places. Of course, the borders are wide open, and we've got a lot of people coming in from countries that we are at war with nothing to be concerned about. That right, young male, single male men in the twenties and thirties, and nations that we are war with coming through the

border and uncontrolled numbers. Sure, there's nothing to worry about. In fact, in twenty twenty two, Christians resettled from the most threatening fifty nations for Christian persecution. Those were down seventy percent from six years earlier with Obama. In twenty twenty two compared to twenty sixteen when Obama was president, Eritrea immigrant

Christian immigrants were down eighty five percent. Those fleeing Iran were down by ninety five percent, Those fleeing Mian, mahar and Burma were down ninety two percent. Those fleeing Iraq were down ninety four percent. And so it is only one thousand Christians from those four countries resettled last year compared to nearly thirteen thousand

in twenty and sixteen, the document shows. In April twenty twenty one, just after Biden took office, as a point, he's limited the refugee resettlement ceiling to just fifteen thousand a year, historic low beforey seventeen, when Trump got in and evidently Trump cut it as well. The average resettlement was about eighty one thousand per year, but that has been cut. And in Chicago

they are giving illegal migrants nine thousand dollars each to cover housing costs. But the most amazing thing is that if you look at the Biden administration and his war on Americans, the person that he has put in charge of deciding who gets refugee status is somebody who is a rabid PLO supporter. Her social media shows a pattern of rabid hatred to America, to anyone who is trying to come in from Israel or anything else like that. But she's going to rubber

stamp anybody who has her radical anti colonizer views. She's been very clear about that. So again, just remember that when we look at this, I'm in favor of just stopping immigration for a while. Can we just have a breathing period here? But more than that, we need to stop the magnet, and we need to also stop this push of refugees that are being pushed here by wars that are not necessary. Let's take a quick break and when

we come back, I have an interesting story that I'll give you. We'll be right back in a world of deceit, Telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Give them back to me your isle. It's too late. There they all and there they'll stay. Give me back my slippers. I am the only one that knows how to use them. They're no use to you. Give them back to me. Give them back, you're wondering, I guess why I'm playing that. Well.

Uh, Actually a story about a man who was able to steal the ruby slippers from the movie, and the people who had them as a collector's item were basically saying, give them back, they're no use to you. And they really were of no use to him. You see, he thought they were real ruby slippers. Let me stole them back in two thousand and five, and they subsequently found out that he's the guy who stole it. But he thought they were real rubies, and he took them to a pawn

shop and the person said, no, they're not. Actually ruby slippers are made out of glass. I look at those pictures there and mostly sequins that are on there, the ruby sequence. How in the world could he be so stupid to look at this and really not understand the value of it to go to all the trouble to steal it from the museum they had them on display. It was on loan at this particular museum. It was on loan to the Judy Garland Museum in the Late actresses hometown of Grand Rapids, Minnesota,

in two thousand and five from Hollywood memorabile collector Michael Shaw. It was worth a lot to Michael Shaw, just like she was saying, they're of no use to you. They're not made out of rubies and not even made out of really red glass slippers that we put sequins on. But it has a value to this guy where it's memorabilia stuff. But these slippers that had no intrinsic value, I guess they were kind of like the kind of like NFTs, real world NFTs. He thought there were real gems, and so

he did this back in two thousand and five. They finally caught up to him, and he's now seventy six. He's in very poor health. He's facing his own death. These shoes, however, the real intrinsic value is the fact that there's only four authentic pairs that remain from the film, and so they took these things that are mainly sequins and glass bead bows that have no intrinsic value, but they valued them at the time at one million dollars.

And so he snuck into the museum's emergency exit when the museum was closed. He smashed his way in with a sledgehammer. Didn't sneak in, he smashed his way in, and then he removed them from their plexiglass in cased display pedestal, thinking they were real rubies when they stolen goods buyer informed him this isn't real. Then he didn't want to have anything to do with him, but these are things that were worth a million dollars to somebody else.

He was not publicly linked to the crime until thirteen years later, when an FBI Art crime team recovered the slippers in a sting operation after a man approached the insurer and said that he could help to get them back. The current market value is three and a half million dollars. Now, since this guy is not related to Joe Biden, he's looking at some serious jail time here,

and so they rolled him into the courtroom in a wheelchair. He's got a paper mask, he was carrying an oxygen tank, because again he is very sick and very poor. Help about to die seventy six looking at a very long sentence here. When they first got him, he denied that he had stole the stuff, but he came clean at this point in time. And his lawyer said, well, I think Terry is facing his own mortality. And I think when people are reaching that point in life, they cut

through the pleasantries and they talk turkey exactly right. Why is that? You know he's going to go before the judge, the real judge, right, And just as he can't pay this three and a half million dollars, what if somebody came in the courtroom and said, well, I'll pay the three and a half million dollars to the other people, make this stuff go away. That is actually what Jesus did for us. As we're going to face the judge. There's no way, just like this man, there's no way

that we could pay repay what we have done. There's no way. And that's why Jesus came. The things that we have done that we valued so much, we realized that they were illusionary of no value whatsoever to us. And that's true of the billionaires who spent their entire life collecting stuff that everybody in this world wars to own. You know, Elon Musk is going to stand before God and he's going to realize that his accomplishments as the richest man

in the world no more valuable than these onny sequined slippers. And so that is where we are. You know. The other part of this that I thought was interesting was the fact that here he is, he's about to die. He's not going to keep up the pretenses anymore. He's going to tell people the truth. And when you know, these deathbed confessions they carry a

lot of weight. That's why when we look at you know, the look at the hospital stuff that's there, the people on the Palestinian side are saying, well, this many martyrs died, and these martyrs did this, and these martyrs did that. Martyrs are They have stolen that term, they've repurposed

that term for the most part, for people who were suicide murderers. Martyrs were Originally the Greek word was witness and you had people who had witnessed Jesus and what he had done, and people who had had been there refused to recant what they had seen, what they had testified to what they had written down. Those kinds of deathbed confessions carry a lot of weight for anybody who

seriously thinks about it. But I thought that was an interesting story. So many of us chase these ruby slippers, and there's a lot of ruby slippers, and everybody's life isn't there. So let's talk a little bit about the parking lot thing that is happening here. And I say the parking lot thing because it's the hospital thing. We've had all these different narratives, you know. We had the narrative that it was done by Israel. We had the

narrative that it was done by Hamas. I played for you the clip yesterday. One person put it out there and said, see, listen to this. This is the sound of a JD M missile. I think it is the right acronym. And then here's the sound of the missile that hit the hospital. I said, well, I don't know. I don't know if that's the clip of it hitting the hospital or not, So we can't prove

it by that. Then we had Israel put out a thing and so well here we wired tapped this and we heard these people with Hamas or Islamigi Hot or whatever the group is saying that they did this, they did it by accident, it failed and it landed here on the hospital and so forth. Well, I don't know that that's you know, we got an audio tape two guys talking. Anybody could do that, and so I don't know that's genuine either. As I said yesterday, we're not really going to know what

happened with us. Why because everybody is lying to us on every side of this. And if your reaction is as we've seen on the streets of Europe, if your reaction is let's kill all the Jews or let's kill all the Palestinians, if that's your reaction to what has happened, then the propaganda's working on you. And now we've come up with another one. This is coming out of Israel is being pushed very hard by WND, by Robbie Starbuck,

by Alex Jones Gateway pundent. These people are pushing the idea that nobody died, essentially, and now pictures of surfaced and after all of this panic saying that hit the hospital and all the rest of stuff, pictures of surface showing that the hospital is still standing there's a massive crater adjacent to it. So again that helps to reinforce the possibility that this was a failed missile that land there. But again we don't know and when. Because of this is hitting

adjacent to the hospital. Now you've got people who are inclined with their confirmation bias to support the side of Israel are now saying, well, nobody died. You know, that's nobody died. Thing. Again, it's back. Look, if you've got a hospital full of people and a crowded that you understand that in these bombing campaigns there's going to be a ton of casualties. Because you've got two and a half million people packed into one hundred and forty

square miles and they're even higher density in and around this hospital. You got more than six thousand people who are not even there for the hospital issues that are camping out in that area, camping out in the parking lot area. Why well, because they thought it would be safe there. They thought, you know, if I get close to the hospital, they're going to leave

the hospital alone, and so they camp out there. So even if it hit in the hospital, you could sell half several hundred people who died and it's not going to be possible for us to prove to people's satisfaction because of their confirmation bias whether this was a miss by Israel or whether this was a Jihad missile that miss fired and then landed on them. I think that's the more likely scenario because of the high powered explosion that is there adjacent to the

building, probably would have taken that down. But still enough that if you've got people that are camping out there because they think that that is the safest place, that is perhaps what happened. And it's interesting that as you've got this that this went on for about forty eight hours before this came out, and you know, you got all these CIA says it's got satellite pictures and Biden says, it's not our team. I've seen the pictures and so forth.

Why didn't they release that earlier? Do they want to have the reactions that they saw and not to excuse the reactions, the reactions that you see across Europe, the burning, the riots and all the rest of stuff. None of that is excusable. But we had all kinds of disinformation put out there. We had people who had put out information on the side of the id eforts, I pointed out yesterday saying, we did it because you know, they're shooting of people from the hospital, so we took that and then

they pulled that down. Then there were other things that showed missiles, and there's arguments about whether the time codes were legitimate or not. And those things were taken down, then some other ones are put back up, and so forth. Both sides are lying to you, you understand, don't follow them into this war. Again, just like you take the audio recordings. Is this a missile? Is this the missile? You know? This is what a JDEM sounds like. Is that an audio recording of that missile? This

is what you hear people saying on a wire tap audio. Is that legitimate, real audio? Or is that a skit? Right? Why don't we believe any of this stuff? So anyway, it now appears that the hospital was not hit. Maybe it was a parking lot. But again, I don't trust anybody in this, and neither should you. There's going to be there's always a lot of confusion in war, but there's always a lot of deliberate wise misinformation to weaponize this, weaponize both sides of this. So anyway,

We're going to leave it at that point. I'm not going to get any further into the hospital stuff. We've got other news that I want to talk about before we're joined by our guest. When we come back, I'm going to talk about climate. So stay with us. We will be right back. You're listening to the David Night Show. Well, this is an interesting story, and I gotta says a little bit of sympathy for the nun and some excitement and what she had done. We have a French nun who

tackles an environmental protesters attempting to stop construction of a religious center. And why well, they say, well, we've got this rare plant here and it's going to destroy the environment. It's like, come on, you guys are so far past caring about the environment. We used to have dams that were held up because of a so called snail darter and all the rare animals.

They don't care about any of that stuff anymore. I mean, they're out there putting up these massive wind farms and offshore wind farms that are killing whales, killing eagles, killing bats left and right, and they don't care about the environment. They don't care about the wildlife whatever. They just want their way. And one of the reasons why I was sympathetic to what she did. And I've got a clip of it. By the way, let's take

a look. This is the flying nun, I will call her, because she takes a flying run and knocks this person on the ground, tackles and this much much bigger than she is. I guess it's kind of a hail Mary approach to try to stop these protests. Here she comes, she takes them down. There you go. And then this guy he's smashing that to Those tubes are part of the construction stuff. And so these people show up just to destroy things, because that's what the so called climate people do now,

just there to destroy stuff. And we see these people gluing themselves to the roads, gluing themselves as showroom floors of you know, the cars, and blocking traffic, blocking people have to get to the hospital, blocking people from getting to work or doing anything, because they don't care about anything other than their little agenda and they're completely deranged. And so it's good to see her do that, even if it was a hail Mary attempt, trying to

stop these climate crazies doing that type of stuff. But you know, when we look at it, their response was the guy says, well, I didn't expect that. I expected the nuns to be a little bit reasonable. You're not reasonable, pow, I mean, these crazy climate idiots reasonable, He says. I was attacked three times by five people who snatched me, who wanted to throw me out there. They decided to protect the site with their actions and with their bodies. Well, you know, to throw you

out of there. That's their property. It's their property. Of course, they don't respect any of that. They don't care what the truth is. They don't care what anybody wants. None of this makes any difference to them. So they were The construction site was surrounded by a group of nuns from the missionary family of Notre Dame, forming a human chain around the area in order to stop the activists. But that didn't stop them, and so you

know, she ran into them. Following the confrontation, the nuns resumed a more peaceful stance, singing while blocking the surrounding protesters. From the flying nuns to the singing nuns. And this is some kind of jackfruit, okay, it's nothing special that they say grows there. And they said, they don't have the authorization to destroy the habitats of protected species. You know what,

you don't have the authorization from us to destroy our way of life. You don't have the authorization to destroy our homes, to take our cars, to take our appliances, to take our energy and our food and all the rest of the stuff. You don't have the authority to do that. And it's about time we push back on this stuff. In Britain, for example, you know, talk about taking stuff from people. You have the guy who

is now there. Infrastructures are the National Infrastructure Commission, the guy who is head of that, he has come out explicitly saying, well, what we're going to do is we're going to shut down Britain's gas network. We're going to confiscate all of the gas furnaces. We're going to roll out heat pumps. You're going to buy heat pumps. And we're going to ban all private vehicles, not just the internal combustion engines, but all of them, electric

vehicles included. This has always been part of it. This guy's name is Sir John Armitt. He recommended that city's ban all private vehicles and they're going to shut down the gas network. They're going to spend billions of dollars to dig through the streets and the homes and anything and rip out the gas lines because they said, well, we don't let anybody have any gas and these things are eventually going to collapse and they'll be hazard, so let's spend billions

of dollars to rip this out. No, they want to make sure that you don't have any infrastructure coming up. He's urging the Prime Minister there Rishi Rich to commit to a total ban on gas boiler sales by twenty thirty five and set out how the national gas network will be shut down gradually and permanently over the next twenty seven years. This document that he put out, the National Infrastructure Assessment, how cynical to talk about infrastructure. All they're doing is

destroying infrastructure. These people are deppopulationists. They want to kill us, They want to kill our way of life everything. They are destroyers. They sow the seeds of chaos, and it's all for the purpose of destroying everything about our lives and destroying our lives themselves. So they're calling for one point three billion pounds a year to be spent on heat pumps for poor homes one point nine billion pound grants worth seven thousand pounds each for other homeowners to buy heat

pumps that are not suited to the cold weather of the UK. Gas boilers need to be phased out and replaced with heat pumps. Say you, who are you to say that? Who are you to say that? Why? Why? There is no public policy case for hydrogen either to be used to heat individual buildings. It should be ruled out as an option as well, because see, it has to be about central control. You can't have any you can't have hydrogen gas, you can't have natural gas, you can't have

gasoline or petrol, you can't have diesel. It's got to be something that they control through their electric grid, centrally controlled through the grid only power. Because again it's all about central control. It's not about emissions, it's not about climate, it's not about protecting species. This is about central control. Now, the useful idiots that are out there trying to stop other people, well they may not understand it. They may think that it is really about

that stuff, but it is not about that stuff. And so know, just one second, we have as one narrative says what people are calling anti science is just anti authority tarianism. It's not science to censor people. It's not science to shut down skepticism. As a matter of fact, that is the essence of science, questioning what the conventional wisdom is, questioning what the

authorities say. You know, when Francis Bacon came out with a scientific method, he put that in opposition to what he called academia, which is that the people in authority, the people and universities would tell you what was true, and we would all agree with that and do whatever they said. Now, this is an interesting case. This is from the BBC and they did a little video report and they said melting glaciers reveal a past, reveal a

past that has been hidden for centuries. They said, with global warming of glaciers, the glaciers are melting and now we're seeing a secret history that has been hidden for millennia. The discoveries have given rise to a new field of study, glacial archaeology, and so they're finding all of these these things that people have put in these other areas that have long been lost and doing archaeological finds. But here's the obvious question. So when these things were put there.

There weren't any glaciers there. That means that the temperatures millennia ago were kind of like they are now, except maybe even warmer for a longer period of time. And of course millennia ago, it wasn't all these things that these infrastructures ares and everything is working so hard to try to get rid of. Right, all that stuff was there. It was not man made, and it was warmer at that point in time. Amazon is now jumping, however, onto a new climate change stress test. This is the way this

is going to be rolled out. One of the reasons why these corporations love ESG. It's not just because they're being blackmailed by black Rock. Yes, that's it's coming through them. You know, you do what we say. Vanguard and black Rock and you know there's one other and they've got about thirty trillion dollars worth of investments in these other companies, and it's like, well, we'll dump your stock and destroy your country company if you don't do what

we say. Well, it's also these these corporations are going to be stakeholders. A good example of this is Amazon, and Amazon wants to be able to deliver things by drone. They're going to start delivering drugs by drone, right because food's not essential, but drugs are, and you just can't get it to you fast enough. So they're going to have in terms of drone delivery. Amazon has weaseled its way in to know that they're going to be

allowed to do. But it's also been made very clear that we can't just have everybody out there doing drone deliveries. You know, we're going to have to control this, and so only the responsible people, which will be the big Wall Street corporations, will be able to allow this stuff. It's just going to be another way that they shut down avenues of a business to small businesses. But this is a big way to shut down small businesses as well.

The climate change stress tests it's going to be coming for Amazon sellers and suppliers starting in twenty twenty four. Amazon it's going to be joining other giant companies, multinational stakeholders holding the stake over our hearts, Microsoft, Walmart, Apple and others and their decarbonization efforts. And so what this is going to evolve To make it short, because we've got Sheriff mac ready to join us

here. What involves is a massive amount of reporting from small businesses, and they admit it's going to drive a lot of small businesses out of the market, and that's why they're doing it. It's the same thing that the Consumer Financial Protection Board did to drive out the small and medium sized banks. Well,

we're going to come up. We don't like this, you know, this loan process stuff that's done by all the banks, and so to keep that from happening again, we are going to have lots and lots of paperwork and other things like that. And the small and medium sized banks just had to get out of certain loan markets because they couldn't comply with the paperwork requirements.

And they're saying the same thing's going to happen now in order to fill out all this paperwork requirement to be able to sell stuff to Walmart or to Amazon. Once they get, you know, essentially a de facto monopoly marketplace, they'll squeeze you out because you won't be able to do the paperwork or maybe we should call it the paper woke that's going to be required for this. So let the black market begin, right. Let's let the black market

better start finding way that we can sell to each other. That we can get around all of this stuff, they said. Eight and ten small and medium sized business business owners say they lack the funds to do this. They don't have the right skills, say forty three percent. Sixty three percent, so they don't have the right skills. Forty three percent said they lack the fun but they said, oh yeah, it's a real high priority to us, folks. We got to not live by their lines. We've got to

not say when they say, uh, is this a high priority? Oh yes, yes, I want you to like me. No, you got to point out their lie, and you got to say, I'm not participating in this. It's total bs. And a survey from into It QuickBooks and remember into It QuickBooks was going to shut down all gun retailers and gun manufacturers because Bank of America and JP Morgan told them to But Into It QuickBooks says two thirds of small business owners say they were taking steps to reduce their ronmental

impacts, such as recycling and using renewable materials. If they ask you a question like that, telling them to go pound sand. Soon we start our own networks of this stuff, the better because these people, I said, it's also going to target restaurants. You said they want to shut down the farms with their made up nitrogen fear claims. No food, no farms,

no food. And of course another part of that is going to be no restaurants, especially because restaurants one of the few businesses that were left for people to be able to compete as entrepreneurs. All right, we're going to take a quick break and we're going to be right back with Sheriff Mac who is feeling the full brunt of southern poverty law centers, profits of hate. Profits will be right back. The common man. They created common Core and dumbed

down our children. They created common past, track and control us their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while

they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. The David Nights Show dot com. All right, Joining us now is Sheriff Mac of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association c s p o A. It's dot

org, isn't it. Sheriff Mac cus dot org? Okay, and uh he has. He's facing a swarm of persecution. They've you know, they this is a Marxist tactic. You know, they focus, they single out one group or one person, and then they all attack them at the same time. And that appears to be what is happening now with the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officerssociation. Thank you for joining us. Sheriff Mac, tell us a bit about what is being directed at you right now. Well, David,

thanks, it's great to see you again. We go way back. Oh yeah, but yeah, it's it's well, it's living proof that what we're doing is working because they're scared, and they're so scared they're willing to lie and put out all these lies about us. They published, they publish all sorts of lies about us, and it's like they're following us around. Yeah, uh, and and literally there are some that are following us around, and it's it's kind of the epitome of stalking. But you know,

I don't mind them coming to our training some of ours. Yeah, let's talk about that charity. Let's talk about why they're afraid of you, because they're afraid of the Constitution and afraid of the constitutional sheriffs. Right, tell us a bit about the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, and then I think that'll give a lot of people an insight into why the Southern Party of Law Center and all these other people don't like you. So tell us a

little bit about the conception and sheriffs. It started when I was a sheriff and I sued the federal government. I sued the Clinton administration over the overreach of government associated with the Brady Bill. And it was the first time in history where the federal government ordered and mandated and commanded the sheriffs to enforce a federal statue for them. And first of all, they can't tell your sheriff

what to do, and they know it, but they tried. And then I started this whole movement to say no to them and tell them to shove it, and filed a lawsuit, and then six other sheriffs across the country joined me. This was all the sheriffs in the nation were ordered by the Brady Bill by Congress by the President to enforce this so called law for them,

and if we didn't, it came with a threat of arrest. David, people think I make this up. It said, whoever knowingly fails to apply is subject to ten thousand dollars fine, a year in prison, or both. Wow. I could have gone to prison for a year. So anyway, we got an injunction against the Clinton administration from being able to attack

me or come near me. I literally had an order protection so that they couldn't come and arrest me at two o'clock in the morning and bring their swat team, you know, and so farth to haul me off with the dog barking, or they probably would have shot my dog because they don't like dogs to bark at them. And my children crying and my wife going crazy watching me be hauled off. And so we did get an injunction, and it's all part of the record, but this gave birth to the Stutional Sheriff movement

saying we're not just going to sue anymore. We're going to tell you no. If you go outside your line, your lane of traffic, we will tell you no, you can't do that. There's certain things you cannot do here. Going to court on every legal issue would be impossible. There's not enough time and there's not enough money. We just need people in the states.

We need governors, we need state legislatures, we need county commissioners, and we need absolutely the bottom line, the sheriff who stand with the people in his county and tell the federal government and state bureaucracies as well. There's a few things you're not going to do here, and if you want to do something here, you better check with me first. Yes, this is just strictly obeying and following and enforcing the constitution. There's nothing violent about it.

We have We've had sheriffs all over the country do this. No one has ever been hurt, no one has ever been threatened with death or anything else like that. It's never happened. The proof is there, But they're still saying, and they get these pundits like Mary mccoord, a idiot from Texas. She says Oh, this is all about violence, and this is all about see and this is what nonsense. This is has never been the case. Look at what I said, and look and look at what I've

done. Yes, I went through the peaceful process to get a Supreme Court victory for us. I got it. And now you say we're violent and we should be that everybody in the nation should be scared of us. Why you should be scared of communism and tyranny and unilateral government that appoints itself king and dictator. And this Marxist movement to destroy America is real and we're trying to stop that, and the people that are in charge of doing it are

getting really mad at us, that's right. And be afraid of these federal agents who are extending their tentacles into everything and demanding that people do things and initiating force against people. What you're doing is non commandeering. You know. That's a principle that's been supported. Well, that's interesting because this case is called the commandeer case, the commandeering case, and so yes, this is

anti commandeering. Yes, they want to come in and they want to take command, and they want to start ordering you to attack people in your area and to make you subordinate to them as a tool of their tyranny. And so we've we've had courts that have supported you and have supported many other areas of this where there is a non commandeering You cannot come in and tell people at the state government level that they have to do what you say. It

is a passive thing. It is a passive resistance. It's like, I'm just not going to do this. I'm not going to participate in your tyranny. It's not like you're coming out there to resist them. You're just saying, hey, I'm not going to help you with this and not going to

do this. And it's also about nullification. You know, I've talked to Michael Maherry with the Tenth Amendment Center many times, and he said, you know, we look at when we look at this, and we look at the non common during laws, and we look at the you know, the different alternatives that we got to an overreaching federal government. You know, you can just submit to this tyranny. If you get really angry, you say,

all right, I want to just secede. You know. Of course, there's a lot of people that are saying that on both the left and the right. But that's going to result in a war, in a battle, as we know. But he said, the middle path is nullification. I'm just not going to do what you say. And that's not an aggressive thing. That is not You're not the one who's initiating this force. It's the federal government who's initiating this force, and you're simply not going to go

along with it because of what the constitution says. And we saw this all in twenty twenty when we had local sheriffs who said, I'm not going to enforce these laws to tell people they got to wear masks or they got a social distance. You know, that was the peaceful way. It was about five hundred over five hundred shriffs that did that nationwide. Yes, and I've told people. I tell people all the time, you know, say,

look, I don't like Trump, I don't like Biden. I don't like any of these guys quite frankly, and none of them are going to save you. You spend all your time focused on the race and the level of government. We have the least leverage and we have the least say so, and on the one office where you have the least leverage, I said, you need to figure out who your local sheriffs are, because as we saw through this pandemic, it's not a theory the people who had it better,

or who even had it worse. It depended on the sheriff. The sheriff could make it much worse than the Feds and the state even wanted, or they could stand in the gap and say, well, you're not going to enforce that. I'm not going to enforce that for you. I'm not going to do that. We just saw that in New Mexico with Governor Grisham's Ordersham.

Yeah, and you had the Democrats who the chief of police and the ag standing against her, and they were all Democrats, and they're all Democrats, they are all liberal Democrats, and said we're not going to enforce that law. And it ended it, you know, and everybody, whether the courts or whether it was the local district attorney or the chief of police or the sheriff of the county, everybody said we're not going to enforce that law. They stopped it. Yeah, And was anything violent about that, No,

they just refused and participate and said she's out to lunch. Yeah, she's not following the constitution. This is the sheriff said. Sheriff Allen said, this is impossible to enforce, and I'll tell you why, because it's unconstitutional. That's why we can't enforce it. It her thus and that she wanted them to use violence against other people and be unconstitutional, unlawful thugs, and they said, no, we're going to follow the constitution. That's what

your whole organization is about. Yeah. Yeah, And you know, really, the secession thing, I think it's one of the solutions, but I don't advocate for that. But I will tell you this. I believe there's three solutions left, three and they're all very bold. But yesterday I saw on MSN that the Democrats are now suggesting that we have two countries in America. And I'm getting where I agree with that. Yeah, because we're going to succumb to all of this tyranny in Washington, d C. And with

the Marxists and Democrats that are going Marxist and socialists and extremism. Extremism on the left is going to destroy the rest of us. Yeah. And so they actually marked up a map that showed which states should stay as a liberal America or socialist America, and then the others that are conservative America. I actually agree that that's one of the solutions for us if we're going to survive. I saw the other one that I said before you going to the second

one. Let me talk about that because the very first guest that I had on my show, my very first program, back in August of twenty seventeen, they were very upset. You know, it only been a few months since Trump had taken office. I took office in January twenty twenty one, so here it is in August, and I was aware that there were a lot of people in California who were putting together a movement to secede because I

didn't like Trump, and so I got a hold of them. And my first guest was somebody from a leftist group in California who wanted to secede, and my statement to her was, what can I do to help you? Yeah, I would exactly. That's where you've seen this over and over again. If you look at the Scandinavian country. Yes, they've come together, but various comedy years without a war. Many times, You're absolutely correct. Send California and Oregon and Washington and Illinois. Uh, and a few others.

Obviously, send them, yes, go New York, especially New Jersey, send them to their own country and let them implug on themselves. But now they keep trying to take us all with them, and that so the other solution is that we all moved to the same three or four states, all of us, and and we would have to decide. And you know what, patriots won't do that. Even the elderly who are retired who could do it, still won't do it. And it's a matter of survival that

we that we try to do that, and we can't. And so you know, the New Hampshire was trying that back about ten years ago with the first State project, and they said everybody should move here. We're going to make ourselves a completely constitutional state. And obviously that didn't work. I'm telling

you, we have to live in the same place. We have to have two different countries divided, or we have the states and the counties and the sheriffs stand against this and stop this tyranny from taking over our entire country and ruining our constitution and our constitutional republic. Otherwise our survival is in real dire straits. And I believe that the easiest one in all of that is what I've been doing the last fifteen years, trying to get sheriffs to simply take

a stand and enforce and defend the Constitution. And they've already promised in God's name and their oath that that is what they would do. But still some of them are so shy about doing that. I don't know why. And that's kind of the nullification option. You know, we were saying, we're not going to participate in this, We're going to be commandeered in this. I agree, I think that is the best of these things. As I was saying, you know, you had the Scandinavian nations have joined and split

apart and joined in various combinations. They never had a war. But in America because of our history of secession and in so many other areas, and of course we know that, you know, our government would would come against the states that do that. As you point out the Free State project in New Hampshire, they you know, they were not able to get enough people

to move there. Uh. You know, we we we were in the situation where we were in austin socialist places like uh, you know, California Island in the middle of Texas, and it wasn't even really much better during the pandemic. I was completely fed up with a Republican led government that was in the community that where we were there, just outside of Austin, and it's like, well, I don't see the sheriff standing up for everybody and doing anything. And so it's like, you know, we got to get

out of this place. And I you know, we traveled through Tennessee here and we saw that everybody was really relaxed about the masks and all that kind of stuff in early twenty twenty, and so, you know, we we came here and you know, Sheriff mac in terms of this pistol brace stuff. For example, I talked to a state legislator here, uh state senator nicely, and I talked to him about this pistol brace stuff. He said, we were already taken care of that. We passed the law saying that

you can't force us to that. If you've got a law at the federal level that contradicts our state law, Uh, we're not going to enforce that. You can't force us to do that. And then he said, and then we put in a state law saying the pistol braces are legal. And so it's that type of thing you have to have state and local legislators and people. You're going to have those dangerous pistol braces. You're going to have those horrible pistol braces. Oh, it's a way to it's a way to

hold a gun a little better, especially for somebody who's who's handicapped. Yeah, that's it, or disabled gun shoot fast, that's right. Yeah, or disabled that's such nonsense. It is. And I think you really touched on a point though with your nullification. We have always had since the beginning of our country nullification, especially when you consider jury nullification, and that's we the people. We the people are in charge of every criminal case and most

civil cases as well. That's done by we the people, and we have the power to nullify everything that goes to court that this government's doing. Except Trump was not allowed a jury trial in New York because it was just monetary. And I don't know why. The Seventh Amendment says, in common law cases that exceed the value of the controversy is over twenty dollars, a jury shall be enjoyed, shall be guaranteed, and yet here's Trump no jury.

He requested a jury and it was denied him. And of course the New York States. Yes, that just shows again they're anti constitution and dividing the country. We're already divided. Oh yeah, we are excretly divided. Yeah, so let's yeah, let's make it. Let's make it permanent, let's make it official. Yeah, Jurdy nullification is very important. And of course we've had situations for a long time where judges will lie to juris and tell

them exactly the opposite one of the guys. Yeah. One of the things I think that's interesting is even on the left. You know, before we had a lot of states that would legalize marijuana. One of the guys I interviewed was New Jersey weed man. And they got him and they were going to because he had enough marijuana, they were going to charge him as a dealer. And he looked at and he said, you know, I think that I can get a jury to nullify this, because most people think that

ought to be legal here in New Jersey. And so he represented himself because he couldn't get a lawyer who would argue for jury nullification. They're afraid of that and afraid of the judges, and so it was in actually the New Jersey State constant that said that juriors are there to judge the law, not just the facts of the case, but to judge the law and what the

penalties will be. And so he show he put that printed up on a card and he put it up on his desk and showed it to the jury and the judge says, take that down right now, and he said, well, it was too late. They had already seen it and I'd already said it. He said, disregard what he just said. But he got seven people to vote to acquit him, and five people regard the law.

Yeah, exactly, regard the law. And judges lie about that all the time, and so he got They came after him a second time and he got a different judge and he did the same thing, and that judge let that stay up there, and he got a twelve to zero acquittal. And so that's the power of jurid nullification. Yeah, good for him. And that's the power of duraid nullification. They don't want you to have it.

Part of that is to overcharge people and get you to plea bargain with it, because it's like, well, hey, if I lose, look I'm going to go to jail for life type of thing. But you know it's also when you talk about nullification. Sheriff Mac. I have a guest that's been on several times. His name is Matt Trouela, and he's got a book called The Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrate's a very thin book. You've handed this out to police officers and sheriffs and stuff and really changed their mind.

It's such a powerful book. You should sell it at your conventions if you don't already. It's an excellent Probably should I have read it, but I have several books already, and my County Sheriff of America's Last Hope book I think is equal to his. Everybody needs to read that book, The County Sheriff America's Last Hope. It's on our website CSPOA dot org. Everybody should get that, and the Proper Role of Law Enforcement probably another, and everybody

should have this tiny, little pocket sized booklet. This is the victory for state sovereignty. It's really small. When you see our website, it looks real big, but it's just because of the picture screen here. So I move it a little bit to your let's see. Yeah, that's good. Right there, Yeah, right there, Yeah, that's good. Okay, tell us about it. This is simply the state flags on all of it. And this is simply a reader's digest review of my Supreme Court case.

And it's the most powerful ruling in the history of our country that says nullifications. Fine, states have the authority to be doing this. The federal government does not have Heartblauche authority. They are very limited. It says, the federal government was only granted discreet enumerated powers. And then he says, and that is rendered express by the assertion of the Tenth Amendment. The tenth Amendment must be asserted. And who's going to do that. The states must enforce

the Tenth Amendment. And this decision makes that very clear. Everyone in America should have this book in their pocket and be ready to hand it to somebody else. It's the most freedom enhancing decision it probably in the last one hundred years in America. Well you need to see that decision. Look it up. Macbus Prince and I Sheriff Prince and I were the ones that are on

that. His name's on it as well. PRINTZ for Montana. So the mat Prince case is something that every single one of you should be totally familiar with, so that we can start nullifying more and protecting our God given liberties. And that's all this is about. That's right, That's very important. And you know, when you go back and we look at the Dobs case that overturned Roe v. Wade, the same for the longest time, and that's what your case said was that, you know, the federal government can't

do this unless they've not got the power to do it. And so they shut that down and kicked it back to the states. And I said, that's great. I was saying that all along. I said, you know, we had Roe v. Wade, and that was a case that came out of Texas. I said. The response from Texas should have been, well, the Supreme Courts made their decision, let's see them enforce it, which is what Andrew Jackson said. When they disagreed with what he was doing

with the Trail of Tears, which was a bad policy. You know, they reversed themselves within one year. It was a bad policy. What he was doing, had the authority to do it, and so you know when they change their mind within one year, and said no, you First they said you can do it, then they said you can't do it. He said, well, you made your decision, want to see you enforce it.

And so that's the key thing is the enforcement aspect of it. And I said, you know, we could have a long time ago, before we lost over sixty million babies, we should have had the states stand up and say the same thing. You don't have the authority to do do make a decision. Life begins. And yet we've got politicians now who decide they

want to try to refederalize this thing. It's very important that people understand the tenth Amendment and that case that you had is a landmark decision about the tenth Amendment. Very important, very important. Yeah, that is, and we need to understand the whole situation there. The sheriffs are the only elected law enforcement authority anywhere in the United States, in every state. They are the only elected that that in itself is where they get their power because the people

bestow all power and he reports directly and only to the people. And that's why this can happen. We've had hundreds of sheriffs doing this right now. We need a thousand sheriffs doing this. That means we need about seven hundred more. Yes, and folks, you can help. You've got to have one. You've got to be a member with us and be a member of the CSPOA and then work with your sheriff to become a constitutional sheriff and erect these barriers with you. He can't do it without you. He needs you.

You're part of this. You're his supervisor, you're his boss. So there must be a cohesive cooperation and relationship between we, the people, the people of his county, and the sheriff. If you don't get that relationship, you're not going to be able to pull this off. And it's the simplest solution for what's going on in America. He can and we can erect

those barriers against the encroachments of the federal government. I agree. And what you're saying is if people can become you don't have to be a law enforcement officer to become part of the CSPOA, and everybody can join. It's our People's Posse, CSPOA posse, so it's on there. It's only eleven dollars a month. Become a member, be a part of this, help finance

this amazing movement. That really is a peaceful and effective solution, and quite frankly, it's the only peaceful and effective solution left except for us moving to those places. I said, or we become two different countries. We already are divided. We might as well make it official. I agree, Yeah, but it's with you. It's important for people to stand with the sheriff.

Everybody's seeing the movie High Noon with Gary Cooper, where you know they leave tall Yeah, they leave him to the wolves coming and leave him by himself. You know, you can't leave these guys out there either by themselves. You can join together with us and encourage them to do the right thing, stand with them when they do the right thing. And that's the only way this is going to happen. And then I agree. I actually mentioned Gary Cooper's High Noon in my one of my books. I think I believe

it's in the County Sheriff of America's Left. Oh good. Yeah, that's a great movie and great example of what this is all really about. We have to stand collect you know. We When I interviewed Jedward Griffin, one of the things he said stuck with me. He said, we have to stand collectively for individual freedom. That's something difficult for people who are so focused on individual freedom. We don't like collectivism, we don't like groups, we

don't like belonging at the clubs and all this other kind of stuff. But we do freedom. We love it. Yeah, But you know, to have our freedom, we've got to act collectively. And that's something that's difficult for us to grasp as we focus so much on the individual. We have to have to go now that now that we've reiterated what we do cspo A, Folks, is there any question as to why the Southern Property Law Center is going after us with a vengeance, lying, lying and lying about Sam

Bushman and me. Sam Bushman does his constitutional thing on his Liberty Roundtable radio show, and he's the CEO of CSPOA. And we've needed so much help

and I'm so busy with my wife doing my schedule. I just got back from a twelve day tour in Minnesota and South Dakota, and there are sheriffs raring to go, especially in South Dakota, and they're defending this Jared Bosley who doesn't want his land dug up by the carbon solutions people and companies and he's not going to cooperate with them, and they're going to have to go around his property because he doesn't want well tell us about that. Okay,

so what is going on with this? What are they trying to do? Well, they're trying it's just like fracking. They want to go in these people's property and start digging and go put a underground tunnel through their property, which obviously to dig all that and go under their property. And these property owners say, we're farmers. We don't want to be we want to be left alone. Leave us alone. We're not cooperating. You're you're not a

government entity. I don't have to do eminent domain with you. You're a private business. And these guys are trying to do something for the environment, which is probably bogus anyway, But they're trying to do carbon is sequestering? Is it sequestering a carbon? They're trying to bury it in the ground or something? Is that it? Because that's one of the are transported. So I thought they were trying to transport it somewhere, but yeah, probably transporting

somewhere where they're pumping into the ground. That's another crazy things like getting down grease and burying trees and everything. It's absolutely insane. But you know, I've seen this from the other side, that Sheriff Mack. You know, I support the use of functional fuels, I call them instead of fossil fuels. And but you know, my objection to the pipelines was the fact that

they were coming in and that they gave imminent domain to corporations. In the case of the pipeline, the XL pipeline, they gave him and domain to a foreign corporation out of Canada, and then they were stealing the farms and rendering large areas of them useless places that people have been there for over a

century. So it's a difference between you know, regardless of how this is going to be used, where it's going to be used for some kind of a crazy climate fantasy, or if it's going to be used for real fuel, we can't give imminent domain to these corporations. Begin with a collo versus London and Connecticut and sumean court made the wrong decision there. And now after you know, saying well we can take private land not for public use but

for a corporation's use. Now they're just turning it over to let the corporation start to take that land without any other reason, and even foreign corporation, so that has to be resisted. So the federal government is trying to enforce this is that what is happening with the local government is and I'm sure the federal government is going to get involved. The company has been offering the county thousands and tens of thousands of dollars if they'll just help them, So bribery

is now coming into it. But this farmer, Jared Bossley, I spent some time with him. I actually got on his combine and we were harvesting. I went with him to harvest soybeans, and I was amazed about the technology and the work that he and his son did together. And this family just simply wants to be left alone, and they have that right. I don't care what his reason is, that's right, I don't care. It's his castle, he owns it, and he does it with his family,

and he wants to be left alone. So I'm going to tell you right now, Carbon Solutions, or what is it, Summit Carbon Solutions, you have to leave him alone and you have to go around that's America. Yes, And the judge who ordered that they allow them to come in and survey their land. Was way out of line because this guy said no, and the sheriff there is not going to cooperate with us anymore. And you know, I told him, I said, well, you know, let's make

the best of the order there. I said, but the next time you and the judge are going to have to set You're going to have to set the judge straight. This is his property and there is no legal reason that he should be required by law or by the judge, but not by law by an incorrect order from the court, that he has to cooperate with this

private business. He does not. He does not. And so this is what we've been working on, folks, and we're doing this nationwide, and the sheriff, the constitutional sheriff, is the peaceful, effective solution to all of this. Folks, get involved in this, come on board with us, join us in this holy cause. And so of course that we're now

we're because we're doing we're making headway. I r e Hr Human Rights Group something rather with liar Devon Berhardt. He sent emails to all the sheriffs in Minnesota telling them to stay away from me, that I was dangerous and that I'm a racist and I'm anti Semitic. I've never been anti Semitic in my life. I don't even know what anti Semitism is. I didn't grow up with it at all. My freshman class teacher, Missus Greenbaum, was my

favorite teacher. I didn't know. I didn't know Greenbaum was a Jewish name. I didn't care what name. I didn't care, and no one else did. And Genie Bellman, she was a Jew. Okay, so we had different religious beliefs. So I liked Eddie Kane and he was Catholic. I like Genie. She was jew she was Jewish. I like Willie and Leroy, and they had a different church to go to. And I went to one of their churches once. It was an amazing, amazing piece of

Americana. And so now my mom brought us up to accept all people and to be phind to everyone. It didn't matter what color you were, or who your daddy was, or what your religion was. And my mom trained us to do that. And now they're bad mouthing my mother, saying what a horrible lady she was, and they haven't brought her name up or her position up but they're saying that I am a racist. That means my mom was okay with that, and I'm telling you folks, she raised us just

the opposite. My DNA is just the opposite. And these people do not care. They're liars. Anti Defamation League has defaned me over and over.

Then I'm racist and anti Semitic, so I tried to call. I saw Jonathan green Glad on Fox News and he was talking about all of this stuff going on between Hamas and Israel. I really was impressed with him, so I left word Anti Defamation League that I would like to tell him because his people have defamed me and sorely mistreated me and mischaracterized me, and so far I've gotten nothing back except they acknowledged that they got my email, so I

guess that's what they're supposed to do beforehand. I think Musk I think must nailed him. I think he said, just take off the ante there. You're just the Defamation League and they will defame people by calling you. And we see this from the left, and unfortunately there are really racist people out there, but they give them a pass because they call everybody racist. That's just their first line of attack. And Stone rolling Stone just hit us too.

Rolling Stone him, Davison and and his boss were touched with him. Do you know what rolling Stone has done, David. They defended Ice Tea, who did killer cut rap so and it went viral and people got mad at it, and rolling Stone defended him and said he was a great person. And now we're being light about and they're coming after us because of what. And yes, you know what, there are books out there about Martin Luther King that say he's a real horrible person. Some people bring those up.

I don't, okay, but that this is the thing. The FBI did illegal monitoring and wire tapping on Martin Luther King. Why aren't we bringing that up? And said all this illegal stuff that was brought out by him, and even tried to commit extortion against him and blackmail, that they were going to give all his sexual exploits that they had on him to his wife. And so I'm against all of that. Yes, And I quote Martin

Luther King in my presentation. And Martin Luther King was arrested over thirty times and never committed a crime, never committed to crime, and yet we don't want to learn from that. And Rosa Parks was arrested for not giving her seat to a white man in America. She was arrested for that, and we preach against that. We show a movie clip about Rosa Parks getting arrested. We said, what would a constitutional sheriff do in that situation? Or

what would you do? Now? If it's an Amish farmer who's being abused by the FDA or USDA, why do we allow the government to arrest them? And like, the federal government's in charge of every ranch and farm in this entire country, are you kitty? They have no authority to be doing that. And so we're trying to create peace and have people left alone of all races and Anti Defamation League and Rolling Stone and SPOC and IRHR and all

these others. And Jessica Pishkoh, a private author or journalist, is going after oh. She even said she's gone to so many of my seminars. She like follows me around the country. She's been to so many of them. She can't help but tell a little bit of the true. She said, this sheriff Matt cloaks himself in respectability. But it's dangerous, some people say. Some people say when she's the one who's saying it. Yeah, it's the that's the typical thing that they do. You know, it's interesting

you go back to look at the Southern Powery Law Center. You were talking about Martin Luther King, history of the Southern Powery Law Center. Morris Deese only was involved in the Civil rights movement in order to defend the Ku Klux Klan that beat the Birmingham Marchers and set their buses on fire. And he made what was equivalent to the median family income defending the ku Klux Klan. And then he got out of law for about a decade and he started running

a mail order business. And then he got back into the politics side of things when he said, I'll give you my mail order list, mailing list names to the Carter administration if I'll do this for free for you, if you'll give me your mailing list, is what it was. And so they did that, and so he got the mailing list Democrats, and then he became this crusader against the ku Klux Klan and against all racism and all the rest of this stuff. When he set out the entire civil rights movement except

to defend the Ku Klux Klan that's where he founded SBLC. Yeah, that's right. Founder, he's the founder of SBLC. And even liberals talk about what a grifting organization it is, and how they've got hundreds of millions of dollars in offshore bank accounts and all the rest of the stuff, and how they spend very little of their money on their stated causes. But I've been attacked by that. They attack everybody that they disagree with politically, and I'm

glad that you know there. Let me ask you a question. Have you ever voted for a grand poopa of the KKK? Have you ever voted for a personal I haven't. No, Yeah, that's right. Have you ever spoken at a funeral for a KKK leader? No? I haven't. No, Well, Joe Biden has yeah, And Joe Biden was really buddy buddy with Robert bird and the Robert Birdy supported Robert Byrd, and the Democrat Party has a long and sorted history of racism. But I don't. But now

they're trying to create one for me. But they ignore Robert Byrd and Joe Biden's huge friendship. And Joe Biden admitted that they were close personal friends, and he spoke at his funeral. Yes, I deplore all of that. And yet and all of them, you know, all the all the Democrats, all the big Democrats, all the big lefty Democrats loved Robert Byrd and had absolutely no problem with you dead. But you know, they throw that out. It is a false accusation. I think they came after me,

all the accusation. There's no question he was part of the KKK, and and he was a higher ranking officer in the higher gay Oh yeah, no, I'm not saying that's a false I'm not saying that's all. I'm saying that What they do is they make false accusations about everybody else in terms of racism. They showed their hand when they started doing hit pieces in March of

twenty twenty. In the first part of April, I was singled out by these people, the same people attacking you, because I said it was medical martial law. Now there's nothing racist about that, right, But these people who say they're all about racism and hate, what's the hate in that? I do hate martial law, and I hate wearing a mask, and so now that makes me what, yeah, that makes me that makes me a mask hater and I'm I guess I'm racist against masks. I don't know.

It gets really stupid. But they've shown their they've shown their hands, they've shown the fact that what they're doing is they're giving cover to real racist, as you point out, you know, real racist. They speak at his funeral and they applaud him and all the rest of stuff. But they also give a free pass to people because they keep crying wolf about this thing. Yeah, and kill cops, and the killer cops they don't care. They're

fine with that. And look at the horrible things that have done. And now Sam and I are getting very very serious death threats uh and Sam just got a real horrible one, and yet no one cares. Uh And And yet the s PLC has created such hate environments that uh uh. They they these hate groups that are supported by the s PLC attacked and killed a security guard at the Family Research Center in Washington, d c. Uh. They

also attacked the Republican congressman while they're playing baseball. Uh And and they nearly killed Scalice. They shot him and they were shooting it up and and all of that was promoted by s PLC hate Yes, uh and so these hate groups that they they this is really ironic and and almost comical that these hate groups I R h R, and Anti Defamation League and and s POC of course especially them CNN, Washington Post. Uh, these these groups have all

been liars, hate groups. And I want to say one of them, Sarah Sidner interviewed me and light and light and light about me, and and uh, that's astonishing that they get they get to get away with all of this, And so we challenge them to honest open debates. We've challenged all these groups to honest open debates. Let's do it on your show. Let's do it on Let's do it. How about this, we do it in Washington, d C. At the Press Club. Okay, sorry, I

had my phone on. And so we're we're we're wanting, we're wanting honest open debates. Will any of them accept that, David? Have any of them said yes, let's go for it now because they know their lives will not stand up to public scrutiny, to honest public scrutiny. And another one

that went after us is the Walter Walter Cronkite School of Journalism. There's something in there too that is and this is an Arizona State University where I live, where I pay taxes to And they did a story on the same thing all about this, and where I quote Martin Luther King, they don't give him credit. They try to give it to me that I believe that we should all enforce quote, unjust laws, and does anybody think that law enforcement

should be enforcing unjust laws? And we bring that up because Martin Luther King said that we should disobey all unjust laws. What I bring up is who gets to decide what's unjust? Well, it's every peace officer, it's everyone who's taken an oath, it's anyone and everyone in government that says this is what the constitution says, and this is the tyranny that's going on. I'm going to side with the constitution, and that's what we're required by law to

do. The Supreme law, the rule of law is all about protecting individual liberty. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men. That is our job. As a patrol officer, as a detective, as a sheriff, as a chief of police, as a county commissioner, as a mayor, governor. That is our job, and that's a jury to make it as a jury, yeah, and as a jural also, you know, that's that's the key thing. That's a you know, we're all supposed

to stand against unjust laws. And you point out the civil disobedience was the key of what Martin Luther King was doing, key to what Gandhi did, and so forth. The fact that you know, it's a passive approach. You know, they didn't get violent. Gandhi didn't get violent, Martin Luther King didn't get violent. And the sheriffs who are going to stand there and nullify these uh, these disobeyed the sheriff of the rest of Martin Luther King.

And we go through that instrum of well we don't do that today, yeah, and who's doing it today? Well, we went after Catholics because whoever made sub stupid stuff up about that. We go after homies, farmers, the most peaceful people on the face of the planet, but we arrest them anyway, and we destroy their farms anyway because we're the federal government and they have to do what we say. And this is how dictatorial and Marxists

it has become and hateful. And yet then these other groups, these hate watch groups all join in on the hate that's right, Yeah, just following orders, you know. And when you talk about the death threats that you're getting and Sam is getting and the government doesn't care anything about that. We've

seen this as well with pro life organizations. You know, they can go in and they can you know, destroy the property, they can set fires and vandalize the property, they can threaten people's lives, and the federal government will do nothing at all. But you know, if you stand outside and you silently protest, they'll come in and arrest you and maybe you send you to jail for many many years under the Face Act. And it's just our

law enforcement has just gotten so one side coming from the federal government. Their approached all this. It's become so politicized in terms of what they will prosecute and what they will not prosecute. And again, you're going to be standing there without any assistance or support from the FBI or any these people. If people are making death threats against you, they frankly don't care. They probably

encourage it. So yeah, it's really sad that it is. And of course SPLC because of some of the things you've mentioned, they have lost so much credibility. They're still trying to get it back. They're trying to be relevant again. But twenty attorney generals across the country wrote and signed a letter saying that SPLC has no credibility left. When you get twenty ags united in that, you pretty much know they got something. And the FBI used to

use them in their training. They don't use them anymore. And the things that the SBOC puts out is so ridiculous. When I was a school teacher, I got an Intel magazine that came out to all schools in the country and on the front page it was all about the prejudice of It's really stupid, honest, folks, I didn't make this up. A female monthly uh menstruation, Yes meinstration was now an article on the front page of the s POC Intel report that went out to all the schools because I was teaching school

at the time. This happened just five years ago, and I'd love to get another copy of that was all about hate. It was all about kind of a hate and prejudice towards a female students who have menstruation. They're monthly, and this is exactly and we're supposed to take this organization seriously, and so I guess they couldn't find enough to blame all the racists about, and so they came up with a new thing about how girls are are mistreated or

whatever because they have menstruation. You know, I think that's been around quite a while, and I think, you know, we've learned how to deal with that, and I think women know how to deal with that. So thank you very much SBLC for bringing that up to us. But it was

so asinine and ridiculous. So I read it. I literally read it to my female principle and I said, you got to see this that came to the school, you know, because I saw it come to the school, and I said to here, I picked it up, and they were flabbergasted, as what in the world is this group? And I said, I've had to deal with them for quite a while. Well, I did a reward about a decade ago on the SBLC, and I called it profits of

Hate. You know, they prophesy about they see hate everywhere, right, but it's really all about the p R o F I T S. That's how they make their money. They make their money by pointing the finger and everybody. And I told the reporter of this just a few weeks ago. Your SPOC wants to use me to scare all the donors into donating more money. And they have lots of money. That's right. This group has hundreds of millions of dollars and so they with that comes this power that they can

put this stuff out everywhere worldwide. That Salm and I are dangerous. You're dangerous, and all that we want is for people to obey the rule of law and the constitution. Well, I'm sorry it's happening to you. That's a considered dangerous I'm sorry it's happening to you. And again, folks, don't let Sheriff Mac stand out there alone like Gary Cooper and high noon. You know that's that's the key thing. And or your sheriff in your area

as well. We've seen this type of thing as a Sololensky tactic. We go after one person at a time, We isolate them and focus everything on them. And so right now they're focusing everything on you. But standhall. We really do appreciate what you do at c s p o A dot org. Thank you so much for joining our sheriff Mac. Thank you, David. It's been a pleasure. Thanks so much. Thank you, and uh yeah, keep keep fighting him. You've got the righteous fight that is happening

there. We'll be right back, folks, stay with us M decoding the mainstream propaganda. It's the David Knight Show, all right. And uh let me respond to some of the comments some of the tips on rock Fan Guard Goldsmith, good to see you there. Guard. Thank you for the tip, he says, thank you for such fak field presentations, David, and for that great interview yesterday. Thanks also for Tony for creating Davidknight dot gold Here's to all of you, and even Tony's Powell Beans the Brave I'm not

sure who beans? Is that his dog or okay? Yeah and yes and again I didn't get to it today. But when you look at gold is surging and silver's you know, moving and all the rest of stuff because of this unrest, global unrest and economic risks of the war as well as the war. And when you look at what is happening, for example, with

bitcoin, federal government's got over five billion dollars worth of bitcoin. They've had some big busts like Silk Road and some even bigger ones in the last last year in twenty twenty two, and so they hold this massive amount one of the biggest hoddlers as they call it, you know of a crypto currency. When you look at that and you look at the fact that they are at

war with crypto. This is even said by Sam Altman, the guy who's trying to put out world coin and he wants to scan your eyeball and give you a couple of world coins. And even that guy, the AI guy, the Market of the Beast guy, that's why this stuff. He's out there saying, well, I don't like the fact that government is coming after crypto. Well they're coming after crypto because they want to push CBDC. I

guess he would like to be the CBC guy. But that's the key thing with all of this, and it's one of the reasons why when you look at physical gold and silver, that you can keep yourself very important, and you know, when you look at what's going on with the crypto, very concerned that the government if they've got five billion dollars and they could easily manipulate

that market. Of course, they manipulate the metals market, they manipulate the stock market, they manipulate that there's not anything that's financial, including bitcoin, that the government is not there to be able to manipulate. But what they want to do is to shut you down and make sure that you have to go through their central bank. Digital currency that to me is the biggest issue, bigger than inflation and all the rest of this stuff. And Unrest On

Rumble neuro Divergent, thank you very much. Neural Divergent one, thank you very much for the tip. He said, God bless you and your family. I'm a longtime listener, embarrassed to say, first time contributor, Well, thank you. I pledge to start putting some money where my principles are well, thank you. I appreciate that very much. And on Rumble, Conservative Thinker, good to see you there, thank you for the tip, he says. When is Travis cam coming back? I don't know, Travis,

when is it coming back. I'll have to eventually get some free time and figure out how to get another camera into this mix. Yeah, Travis is going to be gone for a few weeks here, and my other son is going to be taking the helm too, so he's not going to go on camera. Whistler doesn't like to do that, so at least be till after that. But I'd like to him to do it. He's got a lot of great things to say. He's very entertaining. I love listening to

him, trying to get him to participate more. We just chas getting me to be quiet. Yeah, we could just shame him into uh. And he's got a lot of He's done some interviews with Jason Barker and Angry Tiger, and you know, he could. He could do my job if he wanted to. Let's talk a little bit about gag orders, because everybody wants to talk about Trump's gag order, and as I point out, it's very narrowly defined. You just can't criticize certain people in these courtrooms and everything.

He pretends that this is an abrogation of the First Amendment. Uh. It is a big issue for his campaign because his whole part of his campaign is attacking other people. He put it this way, making himself using always using this to make himself an martyr. Yeah, gave a gag order today to hear that on speech on speech, knowing you stitutional of what she did. And Judge gave a gagorda a judge doesn't like me too much. Her whole life is not liking me. But you know what a gegorter is. You

can't speak badly about your opponent. But this is weaponry all being done because Joe Biden is losing the election and losing very, very badly to all of us in the polls. He's losing badly. But what they don't understand is that I am willing to go to jail if that's what it takes for our country to win and become a democracy again. Well maybe that is what it takes. May get him outher someway or the other. No, it's all

about him. You notice he says first it's shutting out free speech, but he doesn't talk about the principles of free speech because quite frankly, this isn't about the principles of free speech. It's about the fact that the only way that he campaigns is to put out the juvenile, nasty names of his opponents, whether they're in court or whether they're his political opponent. As I said, what the judge ought to send it him to is to force him to

participate in the debate. We might be forced to defend his record or talk about policies, but he only wants to talk about himself. And then after all of that happened, he put out a post from Laura Lumer that docked the Attorney General. He wants them to come after him. That's what makes his day, That's what makes him in the polls. It makes him into a martyr and to a victim. People send him money. He is provoking

all of this stuff in a big way. Wouldn't it be nice if we had somebody like Pierre Pollievra, I think is the way he pronounced his name out of Canada. Somebody who could really shut down these people and then talk about policies right afterwards. Listen to this exchange. If only we had somebody this articulate, this intelligent, on the on the topic. I mean,

in terms of your apple currently, you're obviously taking the populist pathway. What does that mean, well, appealing, appealing to people's more emotional levels, I would guess, I mean, certainly, certainly, you certainly you tap, certainly you tap a very strong ideological language, quite frequently left wing and that right wing. The know. I mean it's that that type of ideological

I talk about left. But anyways, a lot Okay, a lot of people would would say that you're simply taking a page out of the Donald Trump uh like which people would say that, well, I'm sure a great many Canadians, but like who, I don't know who, but the one who asked the question, Yeah, you much know. Okay, I'm sure there's some out there. But anyways, the point of this, the point of this question is, I mean, why should why should Canadians trust you with

their vote? Given? You know, not just the sort of ideological inclination in terms of taking the page of a Donald Trump's book, but what do you also thinking about? What page? What page? Can you get your page? Give me the page you keep in terms of turning things quite dramatically in terms of Trudeau and the left wing and all of this. I mean, you you make quite a you know, it's it's quite a play that you make on it. So I'm not sure, don't I don't know what

you're quing. Then forget that, why should Canadians trust you with their vote? Common sense? Common sense for a change, We're going to make common sense common in this country. We don't have any common sense in the current government. You know, the guy prints six hundred billion dollars grows our money supplied by thirty two percent in three years. That's growing the money eight times faster than the economy. No wonder we have the worst to flight inflation in

four decades. I'm going to cap spending, cut waste so that we can balance the budget and bring down inflation and interest rates. You'll want to be able to pay your mortgage again, you want to be able to afford rent? Then you have to vote for Pierre Polyev because I'm the only one with a common sense plan that will bring back the buying power of your paycheck. Isn't They're great? He owns this guy, Well, people say, what people? You know, that's one of their favorite tactics. What people,

Well, you're this or you're that? What do you mean by that label? To find he can't define any of this stuff, and so he lets the guy make a complete fool out of himself. He comes back and he talks about Justin Trudeau spending money without limits as Trump did. Trump's not going to be able to make that argument. He says, you want to be able to afford your mortgage, Yeah, I'm the one that's going to do that for you. Would it be nice if we had somebody could do that.

You know, it makes sense common again. He even almost said exactly my slogan, it's making sense common again. Thank you for joining us. The David Night Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Night Show, please do your part and try not to spread it. Financial support, or simply tell the others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread. Father. People have to trust

me, I mean, trust the science. Wear you mask, take your vaccine, don't ask questions using free speech to free minds. It's the David Night Show. H