18Apr24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

Using free speech to free minds. You are listening to the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes thirteen, It's Thursday, the eighteenth of April. Hee're of our lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to talk about the reauthorization of fizers. But of course it is more than a reauthorization. It is a massive expansion. They're pushing for it to take place by tomorrow and then they're going to ship this that's in the Senate. Of

course, the House has already proved it. So we're gonna take a look at that. We're also going to take a look at the back and forth about what was really happening in twenty twenty. Was it really just about the lab? Is that what it truly is? Because that's what I keep seeing featured from Ran Paul, and I got to say, if he's not going to talk about the hospital death protocols, if he's not going to talk about the JAB, then talking about the Wuhan Lab is merely a distraction. Folks.

We know that the excess deaths and cancers and everything began not in twenty twenty, but in twenty twenty one and escalating thereafter. We'll be right back.

As a matter of fact, yesterday I was going through the news. I'll always look at Breitbart and the thing that was getting the most number of comments, and it was a lot of comments. It's been a long time since I've seen this many comments on Breitbart, fourteen thousand comments in defense of Trump because this silly trial that is going on, and again, he deserves to be in jail for the rest of his life. I've made that clear, because he's a mass murderer. And this is what we're talking about here.

The mother of the COVID hospital protocol victim, he drove there and left in a body bag. What people are concerned about is that Trump can't go to his son's high school graduation. Oh oh, what a shame. Well,

my daughter had her high school graduation canceled because of his lockdown. But we've got a lot of people, as I said when I covered this initially, and it made me angry because I just see this traction getting more and the story getting more and more traction, more and more sympathy for him, but no sympathy for the people whose children died suddenly from a heart attack from his shot that he pushed you know, there's only two people that I know

of that call it the Trump shot, me and Donald Trump. Isn't that interesting? The left doesn't want to call it the Trump shot because they don't they like it, and they don't want to give him credit for anything that they like. The right knows that it is poison and they don't want to associate it with the guy who actually did it. He's right about that. He was responsible for it. He's the one who ran the whole thing. He's the one who funded it. Give him the credit that he demands that

he gives himself. All the time, they keep saying, stop talking about it. Yeah, people are going to you're identifying yourself with mass murder, and he is, and he doesn't care. So there are two people that call it the Trump shot or Donald trum. To me, we agree on something, don't we? How about that? Yeah? I agree on a key issue with him. Who's responsible for this mass murder? The mother of a COVID hospital protocol victim says he drove there and then left in a body

bag. Yeah, the real pandemic, folks, was the hospital protocol for murder that he paid for, that he rewarded and just conservatives on a just freak out about how much money he gave to the hospitals. First of all, how in the world do you embrace that as a conservative? They point the finger at somebody, say they got COVID. They may not be sick.

They don't have a PCR test, they said. They you point a finger at him, thirteen thousand dollars, you put him on one of his ventilators, thirty nine thousand dollars, right, And then they give once you point a finger at him, so they got COVID, you get thirteen thousand dollars plus a twenty percent bonus on all all the charges that you have there, So you can get the thirty nine thousand dollars for putting them on a ventilator, and until you kill him in a few days, which is what

they did with this guy, this guy in rem deservir course as well, after you kill him or you know, before you kill him, you can get a twenty percent bonus on everything. Why are conservatives okay with that? Why are conservatives okay with him handing tens of billions of dollars worth of subsidies over to these big pharmaceutical companies that have no liability. Why is that okay, Well, here's the sad story of one man. Because tens of millions

of people dying is a statistic, one person is a tragedy. And this is a bigger tragedy than missing a high school graduation. For all the people on Breitbart, for all the MAGA club out there. And December twenty twenty, life was going well for forty year old William Judah. He was vice president of a family owned janitorial company, father of a five year old stepfather,

two other children, and a saw fotball coach. His mother said she was supposed to see him right after Christmas twenty twenty, but the plans were canceled when he tested positive for COVID nineteen and then he began experiencing symptoms such as loss of smell and taste. She said, I would have dropped everything and run up there, but he said, no, there's nothing you can do in the coming days is symptoms worsened, so he told her he's going

to drive himself to the Prattville, Alabama Baptist Hospital. He was going to the hospital to get some antibiotics. By January eighth, he was dead. So from the twentieth to the eighth, maybe about two and a half weeks. His mother said, the COVID hospital protocols which include the administration of rimdzevir over five days, yeah, HCQ and zinc no, ivermecton no. As a matter of fact, she got sick, she and her husband, her

husband's seventy seven years old. They took ivermectin and they got fine. One of my best friends got very severe flu. Nobody else in his family got it, but he got it very very severe. It's going in pneumonia. He took ivermed and stopped it. But what they did was they took people. You know, flu kills a lot of people every year. I'm not saying this wasn't a different flu. I'm just saying it was a hospital protocol.

And there's things like rem dezevir and the ventilators and the denial of care, of appropriate care, and the denial of something that we discovered that works very well against these respiratory diseases you had neuminology. Is that a pneumatologists. I think it is respiratory doctors. I have said I looked at that putting people who have pneumonias, put them on a ventilator. We've never done that before. What's that about, you know? And to intubate them that type

of thing. Of course, that's going to kill them anyway. She told him that in her region of Florida, monoclonal anti bodies were being administered for patients. He told her the nurses at his hospital told him they were administering quote what they gave President Trump. There you go. Did they really give that to Trump? Did he really take it? Or was he pushing rim dezeviet for Fauci. The hospital isolated him, prohibited his family from visiting.

We see this over and over again. Those are the key things. You're not allowed to know what they're doing. This was deliberate murder, paid for by the Trump administration. You would be furious if this was done by Hillary Clinton. You'd be furious if it was done by Biden or by Obama. But it's okay when it's done by Trump, isn't it. I had spoken to and they were also giving him toward all for pain. It was in a lot of pain. They said that he kept pulling the mask off,

so they had the oxygen on too hard. Now think about this. They put this guy in there. They're denying him any effective treatment. They're giving him rimdzoviet, which kills your liver. And had done this over and over again. They knew this very well. Fauci had tried to push this for his pals at Gilead Pharmaceutical. This was his third time, and they were about to run out of their copyright, their patent that they had on it.

He had offered it up for AIDS. Everybody said, no, it doesn't do anything, but it does destroy the liver, so we're not going to prove it, you know, no effectiveness and certainly not safe. Then

he tried it again with ebola, same story, doesn't do anything. Then he tried again for this and there was a WHO study that was done in China that went up saying it doesn't do anything, but it does kill the liver, and that got taken down that same day, and within a week Fauci put up his non peer reviewed study and pronounced it the standard of care. And he changed the standard of approval because always in the past of the therapeutic which is what rim does of areas, you have to show that it

is effective. And his stuff showed the same thing that China did. That didn't make any different whether you took grim da zevir or not. But he said that the people recovered got better thirty percent faster. So that's the standard of care, right, and they went with it. Now. Isn't it interesting that Ran Paul, who has hung out on the Wuhan lab, doesn't want to talk about the jabs as a matter of fact. One of his criticisms of fact, doctor Fauci, you're going to make people vaccine hesitant.

Don't do that, right. Ram Paul is a doctor. He should be He should understand what's going on. He should be honest with people. He should understand what's going on with these flu shots and the rest of the stuff

and the COVID. But he never criticized the JAB. He is a better friend to the pharmaceutical companies in that regard than even Fauci, because Fauci is pushing a dangerous, untested JAB that even Paul off It, one of the biggest cheerleaders for vaccines, always said, well, if we push this thing out too fast, this may cause vaccine hesitancy. So Paul Offit and Ram Paul on the same side worrying about creating vaccine hesity, which they have created

vaccine hesitancy and by trying to defend the vaccine industry. But both Rand Paul and Vauci on the side of Gilead Pharmaceutical and Rim Dezevier. Ram Paul had his wife by shares of rimdzevir before Fauci proved it. So you know, there you go. He doesn't want to talk about Rim deserveret he doesn't want to talk about the JAB, he doesn't want to talk about you know, President Trump's lockdowns, none of that. Let's go to the lab. I

want to attack Fauci because conservatives don't like Fauci. That's why ram Paul is doing this. He doesn't have any principles anymore, folks. He's sold out, just like Mike Johnson. These guys have sold out. They've sold us out. He's got no principles. So he's going to talk about the Wuhan Lab seriously, and he gets featured everywhere, right, everybody's featuring him all day yesterday, the top of zero Edge. This is what got me upset.

So let's talk about this tragedy. Here. Hospital isolated and prohibited his family from visiting him. He's trying to get the mask off so he can breathe. So they ramp up the oxygen, keep putting the masks back on him. Now, what's the difference between what was done to this forty year old man and George Washington? For example, we talk about George Washington's death. He was quite a bit older than forty, but he wasn't all that

old. And he's out riding his horse around his plantation and he gets a cold and it starts to get worse. Than have the doctor coming, what's a doctor do. He gives him mercury. He puts leeches on him and removes most of the blood in his body. And we look at this and goes, well, you know, he died with a cold, but he died from the leeches and the mercury. This guy died from the mass, the room deseevere, the ventilators, all that stuff they did to him,

not from any COVID or anything the hospital protocols. And we're going to look back at this stuff, folks, because it's not going away. It's not going away, and the people who push back against it, like me from the very beginning, will be vindicated. The truth will be vindicated. People will regard Fauci and ran Paul and Donald Trump and the rest of these murderers for their political expediency. They will be regarded even worse than this doctor who

killed George Washington. He did it out of ignorance. They did it out of calculated machiavellian politics and the love of money. According to his mother, a nurse told her son the oxygen was on too hard because he was trying to pull the mask off of his face. She was literally blaming him, said the mother. By January the sixth, he indicated that he wasn't getting

any better and he might need to be moved. He's communicating with his family by text again because the family is prohibited from actually seeing him or having anything that It's a medical kidnapping we've seen over and over again. Some one of the reasons why I talked to Marty Gottisfel so much. You know, this pattern of medical kidnapping that you saw with the children's hospital associated with Harvard University, this type of kidnapping by the hospital that's been done over and over again,

and that's what was done on a massive scale. So I have the medical kidnapping, we have the hospital protocol of murder. By this point, he was diagnosed with pneumonia, but she learned that her son was not receiving appropriate treatment for pneumonia. Instead, they were giving him rim dezevir. I said, are you they're giving you an antibiotic? He said no, they're

watching me for blood clots. Are they giving you a blood thinner? He said no. They said there's something that might be wrong with my liver. Well, that's something would have been remdesevir and they knew it as well. A lot of nurses were calling it run death is near, you know, the stuff that Rampaul profited off of. The Next day, they put him

on a ventilator and he passed. But when she tried to find out more information from the hospital staff initially told her that they had taken him all fluids, is all they said. And then she said that he coded twice and they were able to bring him back in other words, flat lined or whatever. But the third time they were busy with other patients and just couldn't bring him back. His mother said they were just too busy. I guess I

got some other people they can make money from him. Right. When finally released the dish certificate that he died from COVID nineteen and pneumonia and from renal failure. Now he died from remdesev and he died from the ventilator, and he died from their death protocols that the Trump administration paid them obscene amounts of money to administer. William was unvaccinated because in January twenty twenty one, COVID vaccines would not even be administered for his age group. She said, I'd

had COVID twice. My husband's seventy seventy had it twice. If anything, we'd be the ones to die. But we didn't go to the hospital and we didn't take remdesevir. We took ivermectin and we're fine. Now again, all the people out there, I hear that Trump people, well he talked about Ryer mc. Yeah, he made a laughing stock out of it. What Trump did with ivermxin and ivermectin and HCQ was his damaging in many ways, as the FDA tweeting out it's horse medicine, y'all stopped taking it.

If Trump really wanted to do anything, they could at the very least have said we're not going to allow people to be punished. You're not state governors if you here's what he would have done. He doesn't have any ability to directly order them. So what would he have done. You could have done. He could have said, well, you know, we're giving you all this money for this emergency. I'm going to take that away if you prohibit

ivermectin or ACQ. Because Trump has already admitted that he knows that strategy. Everybody knows that. Anybody that's been watching politics for more than a day knows what's going on with that. That's how the federal government gets around all the Tenth Amendment prohibitions for direct orders. They bribe and they blackmail. Do this, and I'll give you money. Here's money. Get your hooked on it. Keep doing what I want you to do, or I'll take it away.

You put the boys in the girl's bathroom, or I'll take your money away. That type of thing. The governors know they can do that as well. The scientists did that in Florida. If you force masks and vaccines on people, I'm going to take away your state funds. Trump said, I'm going to if you mandate these colleges at mandate vaccines. He just said, at these colleges, at mandate vaccines, I'm gonna take away their money.

Well, he didn't take away the money from the hospitals that were doing this kind of stuff, and he didn't take away money from the states that were punishing doctors and pharmacists for giving people ivermectin. So a matter of fact, he could have gone the other direction. He could have mass produced ivermectin in HCQ. But he didn't do that either, did he. Yeah.

He was getting the rim deserver and the ventilators and the things that would kill people out to them, and the tests, the COVID tests, many of them coming already preloaded as positive as we've already shown. So it was a standard of care. Poor Trump, he can't go to his son's graduation. Yeah, well his father can't go to his children's graduation either, because Trump killed him. Yeah. He's going to get away with a murder, isn't he. And people are going to vote for him again, aren't they.

The mother said the pain of losing her son drove her into action, so she joined online support groups that became activists for other victims of the hospital death protocols and the vaccines. She said, with the COVID grief groups who were communicating, it was like they knew what I was talking about. They didn't argue with me and say, oh, it's just part of it. They would say, yeah, that happened to my husband too, or to my daughter too, or to my son too. That's how we came up with

those twenty five commonalities. She said. They've got a list of those that was developed by the former FEDS group Freedom Foundation. I've interviewed a person from that group several times and they have produced a list of twenty five commonalities. This isn't going away. People understand what's happened, and this massive censorship and disinformation campaign run by the government run under the Trump administration, continuing under the

Biden administration that will be defeated with the truth. Twenty five commonalities are just an eye opener and encouraged me to go out and educate other people. She said, I can't tell you how many local mothers who have lost sons have contacted me, or even when their son was in the hospital, they would contact me and say, what was that drug that they gave your son. Ah, that's the one they gave my son to former FEDS is also involved

in a class action lawsuit against Gilead. You see, that's the real stuff. That's the real stuff. These people are former FEDS. Ram Paul is now a current FED, and I'm fed up with him. He's out there focusing on wu Han. These people are focusing on Gilead that he invested in. What a trader. FDA says, no safety signals that link the white blood class that you've seen of the autopsies where they pull these long, stringy, rubbery white things, and balmers say, we've never seen anything like this.

I got to pull this stuff out so I can do the embalming. More than seventy percent of two hundred and sixty nine embalmer's surveyed found these fibrous white blood clots that didn't appear ever before, didn't appear during COVID, they appeared after the Trump genetic code injections. Doctor is sorry. Air Force Major Thomas Haviland conducted a twenty twenty three survey of two hundred and sixty nine embalmers

across four major countries and three different continents. He also conducted a similar survey in late twenty twenty two. They revealed sixty six percent of embalmers began finding the unusual clots in mid twenty twenty one. Oh, when they really put the pressure on everybody, you know, just like we saw from One America the insurance company saying, oh, we had like a this like a once and two hundred year event. You know, the number of excess deaths that

we had in third and fourth quarter. I wonder why that happened. It suggests a temporal link to the rollout of the Trump shots. The white stringy rubbery Klotz, also a Thai neurologist, discovered the same thing. He worked for the Red Cross and their science center there. He is a proponent of the vaccines, but he suggested that these clots might be connected to sudden death. And then he got fact checked along with the other The Air Force Major

AFP fact checked him. He got intimidated by the media, and so the tie Red Cross doctor cave on it. But the other guy didn't, you see, So the tie doctor said he would avoid publicly discussing the white Klotz so that I've already shared all the information publicly that I found useful, and I still support the Trump shots, and I'm not part of any anti vaccine group. Don't hit me with that label. I don't want to be called anti vaxer. Well I do. I'm proud of it. I'm proud of

it. I was anti vaxxer before the Trump shots, and I'm really anti vax now. Significantly increase significant increases in cancer mortality, say the Japanese researchers.

I mentioned this yesterday, I didn't give you the actual numbers of it, and the fact that they correlated it, especially with the third job, the third job of the Trump shot, and so they said increases in mortality from all causes in Japan indicated a two point one percent mortality increase in twenty twenty one, not in twenty twenty, and a nine point six percent increase in twenty twenty two. Researchers found no significant excess mortality in twenty twenty.

How about that, But then they see mortality for some cancers increasing as much as nine point seven percent. British doctor After dal Gleich, renowned on coologists and professor at St. George's University of London, has warned about the potential risks of RNA base vaccine since early in the pandemic in twenty twenty two, he sent an urgent letter to the British Medical Journal their equivalent of the Journal of the AMA here JAMMA, about leukemia, non Hodgkin lymphoma, and other

cancers that he said were associated with the mRNA shot. He said there were melanoma patients that he had who were stable for years and then suddenly going into rapid relapse, typically within three to twelve months after vaccination. I shouted, I screamed, the canary and the coal mine, but I was told it was pure anecdotal, nothing to see. Shut up, and by the way, you'll upset cancer patients. Well, dal Gleiche said, it's an adage.

Now, the subsequent booster doses would become increasingly less effective until they disturbed the immune system so much that the disease you're trying to prevent was actually fueled

by it. So this was early research on mRNA. As a matter of fact, I remember reporting in the spring of twenty twenty one what doctor Ryan Cole, pathologist was saying in terms of I'm look at these people have been vaccinated and have a significant reduction in killer tea cells, which is your body's main defense against cancer, which is present in all of us to some degree

or the other. He said, at that time, it's going to result and a lot more cancer, and a lot more rapidly advancing cancer because these jabs are killing the killer tea cells. So you can imagine after you get three of them, it's really taken down the number of your killer tea cells. Dog Lee study he has been contacted by doctors from all over the place telling him we're seeing the same thing. But see they come back and they say, well, there's no studies proving that, so it's simply anecdotal.

Well, if you don't run a study, you're not going to find out, right, that's what the government will do, have done that for the longest time for anything that's a natural ingredient or something. Oh, we're not going to run any studies. And so since we don't have any studies that prove this, it is only anecdotal what you're saying, and so no studies,

Well, no changes. These spike proteins and ntoparticles induce microclots, he said, And from my training, I remember specifically that prostate and pancreatic cancers are really associated with increased clotting. One of the major causes or mortality. Impatience with cancer is cancer associated from bosis blood clots. By the way,

I'll talk about this just as we end here. But I had a lot of people have indicated to me some things that I could take, because I said, I was only prescribed a Peizer drug which has a horrific safety profile not afiicient, just from the people who use it. And and of course they charge way more than anybody else charges. It's relatively new drugs, so

the medical community pretends they don't know of any issues yet. But I've found an alternative, and I'll tell you about it coming up here, because because I have aphib I'm also at risk for increased clotting, so it's something natural. I'll mention it here in a moment. But why cancer screening doesn't save lives as a matter of fact, that we're seeing several of these articles and they're talking about specifically cancer screening for prostate cancer and other things like that.

They said they did a very large study and they found that there was no difference the people that they caught it early and the people that they didn't, said because and the reason for that was basically what their protocol is for tree reading it. If they discover it early, their protocol might kill you. They found no difference between people who didn't do any PSA screening versus people who

did it and then went to them for treatment. Probably the sweet spot would be to get the test and then if you find out that you've got to do, to stay away from medical community and it's something on your own. They didn't evaluate anybody along those lines, but they did say that they found no improvement in the survival rate of people who didn't have advanced notice and people who did, because the people had advanced notice got all kinds of invasive treatment.

Now I mentioned earlier that the big increase in cancer came after three shots. Well, Alberta, Canada is now recommending boosters every three months. Every three months, that's four year. I want to get it rid of some people, I guess. And this is a place where Danielle Smith, who came out and pushed back against the law of this public so called public health

stuff, that's where she's premier. Now you know there is this disconnect to some degree between the politicians and the public health of things, but she could pull this in and if your public health people are doing something that you want, you don't want, you can do something about it. You know, they're putting out these recommendations. They're not mandating it, but this is what they're recommending, an mRNA booster every quarter, every three months, every year

for the rest of your life. One person says, well, beginning with six month old babies. They can be pushing it on kids. One person says, well, that works out to about three hundred and twenty doses of this or the average lifespan. Well, if you're constantly getting this stuff, you're not going to have an average lifespan. You'll have the lifespan I guess of the new normal. Just trust the expert. That's right. And you know when you look at this, Uh, is she excused by saying that

she didn't mandate this? Is that an excuse? Well, I'm not mandating it. I'm just recommending it, because that's the excuse always here for Donald Trump. Well, he didn't mandate it, he just recommended it. Told

everybody how wonderful it was. Well in Africa. In Africa, they have been the brunt of a lot of these experiments from the drug companies, and now a lot of African nations are recalling a Johnson and Johnson children's drug, a cough syrup that is there Benelin pediatric, a children's cough syrup that's made by Johnson and Johnson, And of course it is not so uh. You

know Johnson and Johnson. You know they're talking baby powder. You know that that became known that this was causing respiratory disease and mothers and children they kept doing it. Didn't care. Opioids, same thing, jabs, same thing. Trump got them set them up in the business to rush up and to do a vaccine. Of course they had one of the worst vaccines. I can just imagine behind the scenes. Look, I know you got all these

problems with baby powder and opioids and things. Let's get you into something for which you have no liability. So three Africa nations have followed, Nigeria, Kenya and South Africa and withdrawing the batch of the cough syrups that's now six of them. Unacceptable high levels of diethylene glycol, they said, which is

found to cause acute oral toxicity and lab animals. Well, it's not the same thing as a polyethylene glycol, which is the peg and the encapsulated stuff but still, you know that causes a lot of people to have anaphylectic shock. Diethylene glycol has been reported to cause abdominal pain and inability to pass urine and a cute kidney injury which can be fatal. Yeah, we keep seeing

all that stuff, don't we all the time? And so I said I would mention the medication that is good for clots as well as some other things. It turns out that it goes back to some Chinese medicine and they noticed that they were grinding up these particular earthworms and it was having a beneficial effect. And so so Western scientists went there and tried to isolate what it was that was different about these earthworms, and they came up with an next track

that they called nato Canas. I don't know. If I dropped dead of a blood clot or something, you'll know it doesn't work, not to the extent that it's supposed to. But anyway, I was told by a friend and by several listeners. Here's one listener I appreciated. Elane says, I know you've been trying to find natural remedies for your blood pressure. Nato kanades would be something you may be interested in looking into I think it'd be great

for you. So that's n A T T O K I N E S E. And in comments on Rock Fin here and H says thank you for being brave to speak the truth to women I know aged fifty and sixty approximately in my area are finding sudden on set breast cancer. One is taking chemo, the others taking radiation. I'm so sorry to see that. There's so many things but you know, that are causing cancer. And we've seen an increase in cancer, but it is really shot through the roof and progressing much

more rapidly due to this. Whatever the bad situation was in our food environment, they can still make it worse. Nancy Chambers on Rockfin. Today would have been my husband's eighty second birthday, but thanks to Trump's vax protocol, he is dead. I'm so sorry. Seven days later vexed without consent. I am so sorry. Well to bridge, the next thing we're going to talk about is politics, and I wanted to bridge into that. I wanted to show you a Saturday Night Live clip from back in the mid eighties.

This is Phil Hartman at Saturday Night Live playing Ronald Reagan, and he does an amazing job. And I'll tell you why I'm playing this clip later. And finally, mister President, about the Iran Nicaraguan connection, some may wonder which was worse. You're knowing or you're not knowing. Well, all I can say is I didn't know, and well we're trying to find out what

happened because none of us know. Thank you, mister President. Well, I hope I've answered your questions as best I could given the very little that I know. Goodbye, and God bless you. Thank you, mister President, Thank you very much. Okay, get back in here. All right, let's get down the business. When I saw this, I thought, do this one here reminds me more Mike Johnson than he does of Ronald Reagan. When you're looking, you'll spearhead our new operation to fund the contrast.

The C five days with the tow missiles and grenade launchers will leave for South Africa at eight hundred hours. I want you to supervise the loading too. Reagan, Yes, sir, well, I'm afraid you're going to have to resign, but first you'll make a public statement supporting me, which I wrote myself. It's over there on the words processor. Just key in and press file. The code name is Oh all right, I'll do it for you now. Any questions Casper give mister President, you're going so fast. There's

still a lot about the Ironnic operation. I just don't understand, and you don't need to understand. I am the christ only I need to understand. Is that? All right? Car Luci, you're new. Here's how we do things. The red countries are the countries we sell arms too. The green countries are the countries where we wash our money. Nothing much has change, has it. It's you're eleven thirty photo opportunity, the little girl who sold the most girl Scout cookies. Damn okay, let's get it over with

everybody else. Come on, move, move. This is the part of the job I hate. Well, oh little girl, what's your well less? You're that good as sales lady. Maybe I could use you up on Capitol Hill. Well, it was nice meeting. Come on, Lisa, come on bye bye. All the people coming in taking pictures by dork. Yeah, it is a masterful performance by Phil Hartman. And I thought, like I said, First of all, he looks he does a great job

of Ronald Reagan, but his physical appearance. He looks more like Mike Johnson and perhaps acts like Mike Johnson as well, But just did an amazing job. And I cut it short. It's very long. There's another spot in there where Dana Carvey comes in, if you want to see the rest of it, comes in and does Jimmy Stewart. Just an amazing impersonation to Jimmy Stewart by Danna Carvey with that as well. But I looked at that and I thought, you know, why haven't I seen Phil Hartman after that?

I just didn't really see too much of him, and so I looked it up. He died at fairly young age. I think it was forty nine or something, and it was about ten years after that skit, and it was his wife. They'd been married for eleven years. I had to seem to have a very good relationship. According to everybody that knew them, that

had dinner earlier that night. Didn't seem to be a problem. And he falls asleep and his wife gets a gun and shoots them right between the eyes while he's asleep, shot him in the chest, shot him in I think the stomach or something like that killed him. And then she gets in the car and she drives to her friend's house and she said, I just killed Phil. Come on, you're kidding. You know. It was very calm about it, really strange, and I'm reading that. I'm like, again,

this is SSRIs, I know. And sure enough, so off sol off. But he takes her back to the house and you know, she insisted that she killed him and something's wrong. Goes back and he sees, yeah, he's been shot. He calls the police. She goes into the bathroom, walks herself in and shoots herself. Murder suicide pills SSRIs. But we're supposed to blame the gun, right, The gun's the problem. Got to get rid of the guns, keep the drugs, get rid of the

guns. Right. Everything for the pharmaceutical companies. I mean, you know, you look at the fact that you've got the Democrats coming after gun companies, suing them directly for even manufacturing guns, even though there is a law that says that they can't do it, even though there's a constitutional amendment that says that they can't do that kind of stuff, They're still doing it. But they don't touch the pharmaceutical companies. I mean, the SSRI stuff is

not even a vaccine where they were given specific community by Fauci. They come straight for it. And so when you look at that later on, her brother sued Pfizer to clear her name, and of course that type of thing could have happened just because she was having because maybe she stopped taking it. Right, That's the key thing about the SSRI stuff if you're on it and

it's starting to cause other problems, because it does have other problems. So sometimes you know, people be having physical symptoms, like their body is on fire or something, and then they'll stop taking it, and that's when you have these kinds of incidents when they stop taking it. We don't know. We've just seen ssristories dot net and they've got what was that nine thousand different

anecdotes like that, like Phil Hartman's wife who killed him. Yeah, the vaccine companies just keep going on and on, and so do the calculating machiavellian politicians. And that's what we're going to talk about when we come back. What is being pushed by the real life version of that, the character that Phil Hartman was playing there. We got him now as Speaker of the House,

third in line to the presidency, we'll be right back. Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere, from country to blues, classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy. Get details at APS radio dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show well on Rumble Junk Silver. Thank you very much for the tip. He says taking a long walk every day is good for clots. Adfiser will never tell you that. Thank you. I appreciate

that tip as well. That is something that I definitely need to do. I'm walking less and less. It's getting arthritis in one knee, so between that and the workload, I'm not doing nearly enough walking. I know what I need to do, it's a question of doing it. But I appreciate

the advice and the concern. Let's talk about politics here. The founder of Tea Party Nation several different groups, but this is Tea Party Nation, Judson Phillips says fifteen years later, the Tea Party movement was an abject failure. That's his term, abject failure. And I said this at the time about the Tea Party movement. I said, here's the problem with the Tea Party movement. Yeah, taxed enough already, I get it. Taxes are way

too high. What do we do about it? Do we just cut taxes and keep spending and let the deficit grow, or do we cut programs? Programs? Which programs do we cut? What does a tea Party stand for? Well? Nothing? Really, They didn't really have a program, and everybody goes, oh, I'm all about tea party. You know, Glenn Beck really rode that horse a lot. Oh tea Party this and tea Party. That's like, what's what's the purpose? Where is it going? It

doesn't have any goal. You know, if you're not aiming for something, you're never going to hit it. If you're not aiming for what you want to do to reduce taxes, either cut taxes or cut spending on other things or something like that or both. If you don't aim for that, you're never going to hit it. Of course, but he said that it has been an abject failure. He said when the Tea Party movement started, it was triggered by Obama's seven hundred and eighty seven billion dollar stimulus package. Seven

hundred and eighty seven billion. Those are the good old days were they Yeah, that's called a stimulus package. Today that is a rounding air. He says. The deficit was ten billion dollars when Trump took over in January of two thousand and nine. Today it is thirty four trillion. Wow, So let's just knock off some zeros there. From ten billion to thirty four trillion, that's the same as going from ten dollars to thirty four thousand. We

can understand that, right, you know the ilions. When you get into the millions, we're oh, I can't get my head around that. But just the same is going from ten dollars deficit on your personal account. Let's say you got a credit card, right, Well, I got a ten dollar ballance on my credit card when I first got this thing. But here we are, after after I let Obama use a credit card, and Trump use a credit card, and Biden use a credit card, they run up

a bill of thirty four thousand dollars on my card. I only had ten dollars on there before these guys got started. The way you ought to think about it, it's going up by trillion dollars every hundred days, and that rate is accelerating, he said, And he said Republican lawmakers didn't do anything.

They didn't do anything when they were granted the opportunity to hold the majority in the US House of Representatives and in the US Senate, and at the beginning of the Trump administration, we had Republican control of both houses and the presidency, and they did nothing about the budget, They did nothing about the border, any of these existential issues. Nothing. He said, we brought the Republican Party back to life. They had nothing after John McCain was wiped

out in two thousand and eight. We got them a majority in the House in twenty ten, and they did nothing with it. As a matter of fact, you go back and look, I've mentioned many times North Carolina had got a Republican legislature for the first time since reconstruction in twenty ten. Obama had carried North Carolina in two thousand and eight, and then every statewide office

as well as both houses went Republican two years later. People did not like what he was doing for many of the same and what he was doing then tiny compared to what is going on under Trump and Biden. All the crises that we have, whether it's a fiscal crisis of deficits, and taxes, or whether it's the open border, or whether it's medical stuff. I mean

you look at everybody was concerned about death panels with Obamacare. Yeah, you should have been concerned about it. If the government controls your healthcare, they're going to tell you if or when or what kind of health care you can have. Well, what do we get under Trump? You see, if it had been done under Hillary Clinton, everybody would have said, we told

you this was what was going to happen when you went to Obamacare. That was just the gradual steps, you know, like Bauci said, we'd do it from the inside, we'd do it with disruption, and we'd do it iteratively, and everybody would have understood, this is an ext sideration of Obamacare, except it was done by Trump and we didn't see that right. Well, I saw you guys, and you guys saw it as well. The general public did not see it, right, And so twenty ten people are

already pushing back against it. But going back to what he said. But again, you know, gave them a majority in the House in twenty ten,

they did nothing. We got the most liberal Republican nominee in the history of the party in twenty twelve Mitt Romney, who could have just as easily fit in as a Democrat because he had already in twenty twelve they decided they were going to push through Obamacare, and he had already done Obamacare with Ted Kennedy as governor of Massachusetts, so he really did fit in as a Democrat.

Either way, you're going to get it. Just like in the nineteen ninety two election, you were going to get NAFTA if you got George H. W. Bush or Bill Clinton, both of them were for NAFTA. You had Ross pro who was against it, but they took care of him. But you know, they do that. They when they've got an agenda,

they get somebody in there who's going to push it. You know, regardless of whether the Republican or Democrat wins, that central thing they need to move along, whether it's NAFTA, whether it's Obamacare, they're going to make sure that the two puppets both agree on that. Then in twenty fourteen we

got Republicans control of the Senate. What did they do. They made sure their lobbyists got their projects funded, and they funded a few other things, but they didn't cut spending, absolutely not in regards of twenty twenty four election, he says the US has passed the point of no return, adding that the former President Trump wins the election, his presidency would simply be buying more time before there is a complete economic meltdown. Well, I didn't even know

that he's going to buy any more time. He may actually accelerate it as he did in his first term. Because see, you've got to have principles. That's the Yeah, it's not enough keeping him back to the to the musical gypsy because I did a lot of stuff, and Karen did a lot of stuff musicals. The strippers are teaching her you got to have a gimmick. Well they got gimmicks. They got gimmicks all over the place to win applause. Right, But you've got to have principles if you're going to change

anything, and so you've got to have a goal. You got to have principles. You know, the globalists have all these goals, sustainable development goals and all these other things. Not only that, not only do they have things that they want to accomplish, but they've got a specific date by which they want this stuff accomplished. If you don't have a date on your goal. You got to wish not a goal, and they're very specific about that. We're still struggling around to try to find a goal. And so you

got to have principles. And then you got to have principles even when you're not running for office. Right after you win, you still got you can't just throw those things away, which is what they always do, and you got to hold these people to these principles. This is what makes it's so amazing to me to see what Mike Johnson is doing in an election year.

In an election year, it is a race to the bottom. You know, people are looking at Biden and they can't stand what he's doing, and his people don't like what he's doing, and Republicans are You've got Republicans in terms of We're going to do nothing about the border, and I'm going to

increase surveillance of Americans to levels that we've never seen before. I'm going to package all these bills together and send them over at the last minute and tell everybody, now, you've got to pass it because we're at the deadline. You got all this stuff that's happening in an election year. They usually wait until the year after the election, did all this really bad stuff to us, you know, try to drag us into wars and bankruptcy and all the

rest of this stuff. They're doing it now. Can you imagine what it's going to be like next year? Anyway, if you look at the history of the Republicans, he said, when did they ever cut spending? The answer is they didn't. If you look at Trump, his attitude towards debt is that of a businessman, not of someone who is looking at the government. He thinks that debt is good because if he gets overwhelmed with debt, he can just declare bankruptcy, you know, which is not over and over

again six casinos, just declare bankruptcy, and I'm out of it. You know, wash my hands, he says. But guess what. We can't bankrupt the national debt of the United States. We can't declare bankruptcy. The constitution prohibits that. Trump didn't veto any spending bills because they spent too much in his first term. And past performance is the best basis of future work.

I'm sorry, he said, I'm just not optimistic here. He doesn't even talk about the fact that Trump set us on the path to a six trillion dollars a year spending fact that you know, it went vertical under him with all this stuff universal basic income and lockdown the stimulus checks and all the rest of this. You know, it's interesting. The Simpsons talked about this in season eleven back in nineteen ninety nine. It was an episode Bart to

the Future, and so you've got an adult Bart Simpson. But Lisa has become president of the United States. As you know, we've inherited quite a budget crunch from President Trump. How bad is it? Secretary Van Houghton, We're broke. Yeah, we're broke. So there's that, and then there's the spy state, a massive betrayal an election year, and besides the fact that we're broke and adding another trillion dollars every ninety to one hundred days,

you have a massive new spending for wars abroad offered by Speaker Johnson. As well as this major betrayal of surveillance, the House reauthorizing the Section seven O two of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Acts. They have completely subverted and turned upside down inside out one hundred and eighty degrees whatever you want to say, the FISA Act, which is supposed to stop the spy. This has now become

a vehicle to give them legal cover to spy. The only person who's really been consistent on this, amazingly is a Democrat, Ron Wyden, who I disagree with him on everything, but he's always been there in terms of domestic surveillance for some reason. You know, he was the one who asked the question of James Clapper, are you spying on American people? Well, well, Senator, not intentionally, yeah, right, This is pretty intentional,

and it's pretty hidden. And when people are questioning these congressmen on this committee, they just come back and say, well, this is classified. I can't tell you anything, and you're not entitled to know anything about that anyway. Is no wonder that these people have kicked their responsibility over to the bureaucracy, where we have taxation without representation, we have regulation without representation, and all the rest of this stuff, because they don't want to represent us anyway.

And so Ron Wyden said in a post, he said, this bill represents one of the most dramatic and terrifying expansions of government surveillance authority and history. Other people are saying it's like another Patriot Act in terms of its extent. Again, he's good on this, but only on this. But you know, we just take these things issue by issue, really do. It's

all you can do. So. Elizabeth Goydon, co Director of Liberty and National Security Programs, had a very long list of a very long Twitter thread, and as part of that, she said, buried in this section seven or two reauthorization bill passed by the House last Friday is the biggest expansion of domestic surveillance since a Patriot Act. Widen calls his power terrifying, and he's right, She says, under current law, the government can compel electronic communications

service providers that have direct access to communications to assist the NSSAY in conducting section seven oh two surveillance. In the past, I mean things like Verizon and Google would have to turn over the communications of any Section seven oh two surveillance targets, and the targets have to be foreigners who are overseas. See, that's the key thing. They thought they had this sewed up right with a fiz that you can't spy on Americans without a search warrant, and you can't

even spy on foreigners who are in America. Without a search warrant, and you can't spy on Americans abroad without a search warrant. You can only spy on foreigners abroad under this FIZE Act. And they started saying, yeah, but what about what about if you've got that foreigner abroad and he has communications with an American, or he's got communications with another foreigner who has communications with

another foreigner who eventually has communications with an American. You see, this is like the six degrees of separation of Kevin Bacon, and they can go two or three different hops. When I talk to William Benny, he was talking about how you know, we just go like three hops and you pretty much get everybody. So the targets have to be foreigners overseas, but the community communications can and do include communications with Americans. The House has now vastly expanded

the universe of entities that can be compelled to assist the NSSA. So it's no longer just the phone company Verizon or Google that have to turn this information over any company. This is what's been changed with Speaker Johnson that he's pushing so hard, and of course bipartisan. You had eighty six Republicans join in

on this the committee that is up. Like I said before, when I talked about this, there was a split in the Republican Party between people who are in the House Judiciary Committee who were concerned about search warrants and abuses about that, or the Republicans who are on the committee that was tied to the intelligence community. Let's just say the CIA as people like that. They want it. The people who are about the rule of law don't want it.

Right because we have this organization that has taken over and the real government in America, there's really this coalition between the intelligence community and the military intellig military industrial complex. We call it the ick Mick or the mickic or something like that. It's really the spies, the spies and the Pentagon or the Pentagram. I guess we should call it the U the spy pentagram axis that's controlling our government. That's probably a better way. Because they love to do the

eyeball things. We call it the I pentagram. How about that the eye pentagram even ties into the back of the dollar bill. They always love to put this single eye there. Not they they call their their coalition of spy agencies English speaking spy agencies. They call it the Five Eyes five countries, US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Five eyes, their eyes, the eye of Horus or something. Right, that's what these guys always go back to. Creepy, the cultic, that's what they are.

So I guess we call it the I spy pentagram. Any company or individual that provides any service whatsoever may be forced to assist an NSA surveillance as long as they have access to equipment on which communications are transmitted to store. So that means any router, any server, any cell tower, et cetera. So that sweep sent an enormous range of US businesses that provide Wi Fi to their customers, barbershops, laundromats, fitness centers, hardware stores in his

offices, fast food places. One of my longest friends, this is twenty years ago when Wi fi was a fairly new thing, and so he goes to the fast food place. They got to sign up, says free WiFi, and person in front of him places is order how many hamburgers and prize he wants and all this other kind of stuff, and he goes, oh, and I'd like some of that free whiffy, and the clerk who's there

doesn't know what he's talking about. I like to say that free whiffy, But my friend is looking at the sign, he knows what he's talking about, free Wi Fi. And they go back and forth for a while. He's dying trying to keep from laughing out loud. But yeah, if you provide free whiffy, they want a sniffy of whatever you're from. Anybody out there. It also includes commercial landlords or offices of journalists and lawyers, and

nonprofits and financial advisors and healthcare providers and on and on and on. In other words, everybody, everybody. It's just like East Germany, except it's a lot worse. As a matter of fact, one person contacted the ranking Democrat member and said, this is looking like the Stazi. He got really offended about that. He said, well, I've seen all this stuff, and I've seen stuff that is classified and you can't see it. No,

no, no, And there's nothing like the Stasi in here. Yeah, it's a lot worse, a lot worse than the Stazi because it's algorithmic and because it is automated, and they have the power of computers and they have the ability to data mine it's going to get more and more automated, and more and more data mining as they bring in artificial intelligence to help them. It's much much worse than the Stazi, where you had half of the people

spying on the other half of the people all the time. The amendment even extends to service providers who come into our homes, house cleaners, plumbers, people performing repairs, it service providers. Anybody who has access to laptops and routers inside of our homes could be forced to serve as surrogate spies, or you could be forced to serve as a spy on them. You see, none of these people or businesses would be allowed to tell anybody about the assistance

that they were compelled to provide. They like, you would be put under a gag order and you would face heavy penalties if you fail to comply with it. And that's not even the worst part. Unlike Google and Verizon, most of these businesses and individuals like the ability to isolate and to turn over a target's communication, So you'll have to give everything, perhaps even equipment itself, so they can just narrow it down to one. But you just could

turn over everything and Essay has a cart block to look at everything. This is why you know, when Speaker Johnson said he's a war speaker, people just need to shut up because it's a really difficult job. Look, we are in we are an unprecedented times. Okay, we're in dangerous times. This has been articulated here around the world and here at home. We need steady leadership, We need steady hands at the wheel. Look, I regard myself as a as a wartime speaker. I mean, in a literal sense,

we are I knew that when I took the gabble. I didn't anticipate that this would be an easy path. Former Speaker Nuke gingridg posted a couple of days ago on his social media that this is the hardest challenge it's face to speaker, probably in the history of the country and the moment we're in right now. He said, arguably maybe comparable to the Civil War, but maybe worse. Well, you know new it's a bit of a goal. That's as well himself. But he did say something I thought was very wise.

He said, you look at what's happening. You got eighty percent of the people who want this and twenty percent of the people who want that. Where do you want to be? What do you want to be? Mike Johnson? We're an election year here, What do you want to do? You want to be with the eighty percent of the twenty percent? Well, he got twenty billion dollars in one quarter, so I guess we know where he wants to be. He wants to be with the money side. And

he was told coming in, you're going to be a wartime speaker. I said, when I played that clip yesterday, I said, so, when did we have that vote about war? You know that's your responsibility, speaker. You should know that we don't go to war without declaration, and you were the guys who were supposed to do that. When did we have that? I missed it? And I said, well, maybe he's talking about war with us, A literal war with us. He said, literally at

war. The NSA having wholesale access to domestic communications on non precedented scale would then be on the honor system. You know, they're going to get your entire device and all your records anything, because you can't separate the stuff out, and they'll be able to pull out and retain whatever they want. House leaders deny the administration has any intent to use this provision so broadly. Listen

to their excuse. Supposedly, there is a single type of service provider that the government wants to rope in. But I didn't want anybody to know what that type of service provider was, so they hid the real goal by writing in the amendment as broadly and as vaguely as possible. So we want this particular type of service provider, but let's just put everything in there, so they don't know what we really want. Well, we know what you really

want. You really want everything. Oh, don't worry. That's the only one that we want to do. We're on an honor system. Of course, these people don't even know the meaning of honor. So the administration is not actually going to use all that power. It just persuaded the House to give it. And of course it is being pushed by Biden. Speaker Johnson is rubber stamping everything the Biden administration wants. Tell me again, because I

was just talking about that. Brendan Smith was saying, you know, I used to think that there was no difference between Republicans and Democrats, but now with Trump, I know there's a big difference. Tell me again, how about that difference there, and when you got Trump doing everything that all the other globalist presents are doing at exactly the same time, what is the difference? You know, we didn't see a difference politically from one country to the

other. I don't see a difference within our own country. You know, we got this supposedly hard right Christian conservative congressman who was that way before. He evidently had discussions with people saying we're going to have wars. Let's let you be the wartime speaker. We'll get lots of money to you, and immediately comes out and say, yeah, I pose all that money for Ukraine, but now I'm all for it. How much do you want to increase the IRS? I'm all for that too. He's not even going to go

with the McCarthy reductions, you know, we're not. We're back to growing it. Make it seven times bigger than it was going to be instead of just five times bigger. We're going back to what Pelosi you wanted, what Biden wants. Give them everything they want. Because you want to go to war with the American people, Well you go to war with him by using the NSA. You got war with him by using the IRS. You go to war with them by using the FBI. As we talked about in that

interview yesterday, they're going to get a new headquarters center. It's going to be twice the size of the Jagger Hoover building that they've got now. But of course they'll keep the Jaggar Hoover building as well, So, in other words, are going to be three times bigger. And that's not just yeah, that's just their headquarters. How many other people are they going to be adding in all these other different places. So explode the size of the surveillance

police state. We explode the size that people around there constantly and trapping Americans based on their political positions. We explode the size of the tax collectors. And our Republican conservative leader Speaker is all for it. He's right, there no difference between him and Biden at all. So he says, I can

overstate how mind blowingly irresponsible this is. I don't think any administration should be trusted with an orwelliam power like this one, even if this had administration doesn't plan to make full use of it, go ahead and fill in the rest of this right we all know, and she said there are certain powers a government should never have in a democracy, and these are the powers these people are breaking legs to get. You. Come with us on this or you're

out again. The guy Jim Hines, the ranking Democrat, She said, here's the thoughtful and conscience's reply he made to somebody who was concerned about this. You know, yes, I know exactly what's in there. Some of it is classified. None of it is stazzy like you can sell your nonsense somewhere else. He said, this is the arrogance of politicians in an election year. We're well into the election year. This is their arrogance in an

election year. They know that they're not accountable. They know that these federal elections mean absolutely nothing, folks. The federal level is gone, It's been gone for a long time. It is bankrupt, it is non re responsive, it is arrogant, it is at war with us. And both the Democrats and Republicans fit that bill at the federal level. They both do. There's a handful that are good on one issue or the other. Yeah, But the only guy I agree with on everything, and he always sticks out

by himself is Thomas Massey. I gotta say that. You know, he's a so far, he's been one hundred percent. In my book, everything that I've seen him do I agree with, and everything that he does usually is a courageous stand by himself move. I think he's better than Ron Paul. Frankly, the White House will tell Senators they have no choice other than the past the House bill, because this is going to expire tomorrow. April the nineteenth. What a famous day. April the nineteenth. Yeah, the

day of the British came for the guns that conquered in Lexington. The day the Nazis burned down the resistance at the Warsaw Ghetto because these people took the guns from the Nazis and held down some Panzer division for quite a while. They just burned them down in Warsaw. And the day that the atf an FBI burned down all those men, women and children at the Branch Davidian Compound over guns again just burned them alive. This April nineteenth deadline only exists on

paper. A notational deadline is no reason to create a surveillance state. The Senate must take the time to get this right. It's not just our civil liberties that are at stake, it is our democracy. Well, it is our Republic. It is our constitution. That's Elizabeth Goyon, and she's absolutely right about that. But it tells you who the real government is, isn't it. Can we not see that the real government is the I pentagram? And can we not see who serves the eye pentagram, the single eye pentagram?

And we need to need a logo for that. I guess can't sell it as a T shirt. Nobody want to have the kind of a cultic thing wearing it around. It's like, so what culture you had? But you know, just take the pentagon pentagon from an aerial viewpoint, you stick that single eye in it, and you got it right there. But nobody's gonna want to wear that T shirt. Maybe we could give one to Speaker Johnson. You would probably wear it. The removal of Speaker Johnson heats up.

Yeah, we know what his war is now. It's the war against the Constitution. It's a war against Americans. Thomas Massey, as I pointed out yesterday, joining Marjorie Taylor Green and but so far it's just the two of them opposed to that. Well, a couple others have said something about it, but they're not signing on to this thing. To remove him.

As a matter of fact, you've got one Republican from North Dakota, Kelly Armstrong, who told the Hell that in terms of talking about these efforts to throw Johnson out, he says, I don't know who at this point would want the job. Well, you better find out, because that's a person that you really want in the job. The person you want in the Speaker of the House is not the person who is seeking it, not the person who wants twenty billion dollars a quarter, like Speaker Johnson. It's the person

who doesn't want it. That's the way it used to be done. That's why you would have nominating committees, because it was considered to be very very bad form for somebody to put themselves forward. Look at the self serving politicians we have now, and look at the kind of government we have now. And sot Joel Scouzon on the other day, I thought it was funny. He's going to run for the Constitution Party. So he's talking to some other people there and it's like would you want well, I don't know, Okay,

I'll do it. And it reminds me of when we're in the libertarian parties. So who's going to run for the different offices there, and it's like, I don't want to do it. Well, I did it last time, and so did last as your turn to run, so you would come on, you gotta you've got to do it this time. We've done it before. You've got to do it. That's the kind of people you

really want to have in office. So I don't know who out of the Republican Party would want this this well, you know, if you can find somebody who really doesn't want it, who really really really doesn't want it, not just because they don't want the brick bats and the uh you know, the criticism and everything, but they really don't want to be empowered. That's the person you really want to have, he says. And now we're walking into an election cycle. Yeah, we're an election cycle, and they don't

care at all what people want. You know, Johnson is tripling down on mortgaging America's future to pay off the Ukrainian leader Zelenski. As Breitbart puts it, the household vote on Saturday night on a yet to be released for an aid package. So this is so they're sending all this stuff over to the Senate, and what he's doing is he's packaging these four bills along with Faiza

and TikTok and stuff, and he's got all these other things. He's sending all that over to get them to pass this stuff on, sending the FISA thing over for them to pass this on tomorrow, and then he's going to put the four bills together. He's going to have the House passed the military spending bills on Saturday and then send all four of them over to the Senate

to be approved as a giant package. This is always reprehensible when Pelosi did it, and it still is reprehensible even though it's now become standard operating procedure. Yeah, so just tell me that this guy is not owned by the Eye and Pentagram. Johnson texted House Republicans late Wednesday morning that he would soon release the text of three bills to fund America's national security interest in ally says

he put it. Those three bills to fund Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan will be packaged together with a fourth bill that combines the REPO Act, the TikTok ban, and sanctions and other method measures into a single rule. There you go, That's exactly what the establishment wants, is what he's doing now.

Jd Vance, senator out of Ohio, says, the rumored course of action in the House combine Ukraine and Israel Aid with other Biden boondoggles, send it all to the Senate as a combined package, then let the House vote on a fake border security package that has no chance. He says, is not only betrayal, but it's stupid politics to boot. It's almost like they want the Democrats to take the control of the Senate this next time, isn't

it newsflash for Speaker Johnson, said Marjorie Taylor Green. We've already passed, the Senate has it and refuses to secure our border. They want five thousand illegals per day to come in. The House passed fourteen billion dollars for Israel Aid in November, and the Senate refuses to pass it. You, Speaker Johnson, voted against three hundred million dollars for Ukraine before we gave you the

gavel. You're with a majority of Americans of Republicans at that time. And of course, with all this happening, just remember at the border, we really do have a literal invasion, and this is a literal invasion of cartels who have the money to just drive this expensive boat just at full speed right up onto the beach and you got about twenty guys. It's like a military assault jumping out of this thing and just abandoning that expensive boat. Now,

who can do that? Well, the same kind of cartels that are in a literal war with Mexico and other Central American countries, and the drug war that has run for so long has created so much wealth and power in these criminal operations that they're now challenging nation states throughout Central and South America, and they will challenge this nation state as well. And there's the invasion happening right

there. This is you know, you've got massive sea of people coming across, thousands at a time in caravans, and then you've got cartels that are doing this repeatedly. That's not the only one that one was caught on, but people are saying that's happening all the time. They buy these expensive boats, use them once, and just abandon them because they've got so much money

and power. And we're being abandoned, you know, they're abandoning their boats, But we have been abandoned by our politicians totally neglecting the southern border. Scott Perry Jim Banks Republicans said this is insanity, and in this foreign aid framework, there is nothing for the US, nothing for US as all for other countries. You know, they're coming in. They're upset about the fact that we're giving three times as much to Ukraine as we're are at Israel.

Where do we get the money to give to any of them? We're busted. We have trillions of dollars in debt, and they are going to ground this economy and just abandon it. Why well, because just like that boat that you saw, these people, these parasites don't care about the host.

You know, they're like they are. These politicians are like parasites. They will destroy the country that they're feeding on, America, and then they'll just move on to something else, or they'll come in and they'll pick the bones. So what does Trump say about all this stuff? He says, well, we'll see what happens. He doesn't want to take a position on any of this because he's a pure opportunist. He's a fence sitter. He doesn't

have any principles. He's going to show no leadership, and that includes on the border or foreign wars. He's just gonna sit on the sidelines and watch what happens. He doesn't want to get involved in any of this because he has no principles. He will make no difference or he will be used. The difference that he'll make is he'll be there as a pacifier in the mouth of conservatives. As a matter of fact, just to show you what he

really cares about. He is now saying that if any candidates use his likeness in their campaign, he wants a cut. He wants a cut of the money they bring in. It's always been about the money, and it's always been about the celebrity. He is a celebrity candidate looking to make himself wealthier. Has always been about money and celebrity for him, and it still is. It's not about principles whatsoever. You know, even before he ran,

he trademarked MAGA. He trademarked that in twenty twelve, and then it went it became effective in twenty fifteen. I remember when that happened. I was I actually talked about on there. I said, so, how in the world is make America great again? How is that something that is so brilliant that it could be trademarked first of all. But I've never seen a political candidate trademarked their campaign slogan like that before. I said, it shows that

it's just all about money with him. He wants to trademarket so he can merchandise it. And he did take legal action to support that trademark. He that went, he got it into twenty twelve, and then as his campaign

kicked off, he made it effective because he's all about the money. And so Forbes points out that if he's telling people that are using his likeness in their campaign stuff, candidates who use his name, his image, his likeness have been asked asked, it's just a request, but there's some things than here. If you don't go along with the request. If they use his

name, his image is likeness. They've been asked to split a minimum of five percent of all fundraising solicitations to Trump and to the Republican National Committee, which is now co chaired by his daughter in law, and he split that is higher than five percent. Quote will be seen favorably by the RNC and President Trump's campaign doing some bonus points with us. Give me more than five percent, but you better give me at least five percent, or you're going

to be the RNC is going to come after you. Trump's going to come after you. Everybody is scared to death of Trump. I look at politicians, even at the state level that I have had a lot of respect for what they do at state level. Who becomes sycophants who are tweeting stuff about Trump, who are groveling to Trump. They're scared to death of him and of his Maga mob. People like Laura Looney, people like that. He La, You're pathetic. I don't care what you do. I'm not just

amazing. She is a caricature, a caricature, a plastic surgery and plastic policies. It's just amazing plastic politicians. Trump's campaign also asks candidates and committees to avoid speaking on behalf of Trump and their messaging, mentioning his family or questioning reader's support of Trump and more. Business relationships between vendors and Trump's fundraising committee will be suspended if the guidelines are violated. Well, there you go.

R and C will cut you off in every way possible if you don't follow him. Finally, when we look at Germany, we can see a reflection of what is happening here under our speaker Johnson, and the extension of Faiza, the biggest extension that we've seen the head of German Germany's spy agency as advocating for spying on people's speech as well as their thoughts. You see Heinz, the Democrat who got so upset because the constituents said, you guys

are acting like Stazi. Well, you know, the Germans know all about the Stazi, and he's right, this isn't the Stazi. What Germany and the US and all these people are doing right now is far far worse than what the Stazi did. Because the Stasi was getting everybody snitching on everybody else, and they didn't have the manpower to go through and collate all this stuff. We do have the manpower to do all that stuff, and that makes it a lot worse, a lot worse because the technology that's been added to

this. A German paper gave their commentary on some of the salient parts of this guy who is His name is Haldenbang. He is head of the German spy agency. As they point out, he likes to write in the pluraliss ma justice tists towards the royal we, he says, yes, we are often in the media for specific occasions in order to enable an informed political debate even below the bands. This is part of our legal mandate as an early warning system. As the German newspaper says well on plain language, what he

wants to do is to spread suspicion. One waits in vain for a word of self criticism here for example, in today's journal on June twentieth, twenty twenty three, he saw it as his task to lower the political party AfD. He wanted to lower their poll ratings. That's what he puts on today's journal. So he's specifically coming after a political party to take down their poll ratings, clearly taking the side of the last generation as well. These are

the eco terrorists who call themselves a last generation. They've been involved in acts of violence, in arson and all all kinds of things, blocking traffic, that type of thing. The last generation people, he said, the last generation is not extremist. Although they commit crimes, they do not engage in extremism and he doesn't care they commit crimes. Alden Bang therefore sees no reason at present to monitor the last generation. But the people who don't commit any

crimes a FD who are merely political opposition, he does monitor. He also writes freedom of opinion also has limits. The most extreme limits are set by criminal law, for example, with regard to punishable propaganda offenses or incitement to hatred. Oh yeah, we got hate laws. But listen to this, he says. However, even below the criminal law limits, and without prejudice to their legality, expressions of opinion can be relevant in terms of constitutional protection

law. If the Office for the Protection of the Constitution becomes active below the criminality limit, the newspaper said, this means nothing less than that all legal recourse and all review of state actions are excluded. Anyone accused of crimes can defend themselves in court, and judicial decisions are bound by law. But if this is something below the level of criminality, then we've got something altogether different. And this has been the case in America for a very long time.

When you look at civil asset forfeiture, well, this is not a crime, this is a civil action. If this was a violation of a law put in by your elected representatives, then you would have due process and you would have protection against excessive punishment and things like that. But this is not that you have no presumption of it, since you have no due process or protection against the finance, because this is just a civil rule created by the

bureaucracy. This is below the level of criminality. This is the kind of legal fiction that they've been running against us for a long time. And of course the drug war was a justification for this. So you can get no due process and even more severe penalties than you could if it was something that

was legal. So, as they point out in this newspaper, the government itself in Germany said that for the year twenty twenty two, the number of crimes that they had from left wing extremists was thirteen five hundred and forty two for right wing extremism seven hundred and eighty eight. So, in other words, fifty five percent of violent crimes were left wing, forty five percent right wing. This guy doesn't care about left wing. He doesn't care about the

fifty five percent. He's only concerned about forty five percent, and he's concerned about right wing political beliefs and political parties. And he doesn't care about crimes. He cares about what he concerned what he thinks is extremism. He doesn't care at all about crimes or violence, so they event a new kind of criminal offense, the alleged disparaging of the state. This is beyond hate crime

stuff. You disparaged the state. What does that mean? Well, what that means is actually you're criticizing the state's measures against things like COVID or things like climate If you criticize those measures, you are disparaging the state, and we will come after you. That is exactly what these people have done. And just one last thing, if you think there's a difference between left and

right, Donald Trump's billionaire donor gave Letitia James thirty six thousand dollars. This is from Newsweek, but the headline is not accurate as a matter of fact, that it's a billionaire couple, the cats some matitis. I don't know their last name, but they gave five hundred and fifteen thousand dollars to Trump

for its presidential campaign in twenty twenty five hundred and fifteen thousand dollars. However, this time around, they gave thirty six thousand dollars to Letitia James and thirty three thousand dollars to Trump. They're giving them exactly the same thing this time around. They're supposedly on opposite ends, right, they are diametrically opposed

to each other. And yet these billionaires know how things work, who buy influence, and they don't care about principles, they don't care about policies. As I am, I'm buying my way. This is why we have so much money. When you look at the amount of money that is being spent on these federal campaigns, that is basically a metric of growing corruption because people like this are just buying personal access and they're going to buy it from both

sides. And you know, whoever wins, they're going to get an amazing return on their investment. You know, give them tens of thousands of dollars and you get back tens of millions of dollars in some special project that they'll help you with. That's what is going on. That's why we see these

campaigns skyrocketing. That's one of the reasons why I speaker Johnson got twenty billion dollars and one quarter one quarter that rate, he's going to get eighty billion in a year, as I said, that's more than Al Gore had in the presidential race all together. In two thousand, he had seventy billion. George H. W. Bush. George W. Bush had one hundred billion, but you got Speaker Johnson collecting it at the rate of eighty billion in just one year on Rock Finn. We're going to take a break here and

join with twenty before we do on Rock Finn. Thank you very much, James for the tip. I appreciate that. And hairn h to Ca Baron says, Karen Knight, your tie background picks her so lovely. Did you get my email regarding history books? Well, I'll have to ask her. I think I'm not sure if she got that or not, but I'll she appreciates the comment because she does work very hard on getting the backgrounds and the ties to match, and she will really appreciate that you noticed and liked it.

And I appreciate what she does as well, and she does many other things behind the scenes that nobody sees. We'll be right back. Elvis the Beatle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at apsradio dot com. The common Man they created common Core, dumbed down our children. They created common Past to track and control us. They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the

common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow

dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. The Davidknightshow dot com. Okay, and joining us now is Tony Rderman and he has wise Wolf Gold. He's set up David Knight Nott Gold to take you there. Let him know that you've come through us and right now gold is at the center of everything, isn't it, Tony. It's amazing to see everybody turning to gold. We've even got the president of El Salvador who has been very

heavily into bitcoin and pushing that. Now he's even actually embracing gold. What's going on absolutely amazing times, David, I just read one of the funniest headlines was Zimbabwe has a new gold back currency and they're saying implicitly, we're not going to create more currency units than the gold reserves that we have. Now if anybody knows anything about Zimbabwe, as that was the international joke because

they had the trillion dollar notes of fiat. So this is a complete one eighty and a departure from really where the world's been since nineteen seventy one when Richard Nickols Dickson took us off the gold standard. Now we have there's a lot of reporting coming out the major buyers that really you peel down the layers, it becomes China and a lot of these the old distributors that we're making like one ounce gold bars for people around the world are actually turning into kilo

bars and being shipped to China. This is happening all over Europe. I'm noticing this in my business. It's weird. The price of gold continuing to go up, continuing to break all time highs, but the buyers for large amounts of gold in the public sphere are actually decreasing. But the buyers in the larger central bank buyers, those are increasing, So it's a strange time.

You're seeing like a lot of dealers like me taking in a lot of buyers, and those those bars and all those ounces I believe probably flowing up somewhere to central banks and larger, larger buyers and institutions. And it's really interesting, David. It's across the board and it's driving the goal price, and I know the financial analysts are all very confused by it because it has nothing to do really with the markets. The Federal Reserve and Jerome and Pal's

language about raising rates or lowering rates. It isn't really moving gold. Yeah, I think that's confusing people because it's really about its global demand and it's unpressing and global demand by central banks and especially players like China. I kind

of referenced it quickly after. I didn't read all the different quotes, but there were about ten different people that are involved with the Federal Reserve talking about how, well, you know, I don't think we're going to move as quickly to reduce interest rates, and all of them talking about how we're going to hold them there and kind of hinting that it's going to stay at these

rates or maybe go up. They're putting all this stuff out. As you've talked about many, many times, the interest rates are their way of attacking gold. They're trying. So now they're talking about, well, we're going to keep interest rates up and not lower them in that type of thing. But that's not causing gold to go down. And you talked about this in the past as well. Isn't interesting that, you know, they keep raising

interest rates and things like that, and it really hasn't tanked gold. And it has and all these comments from the Federal Reserve about how we're going to keep interest rates strong, in other words, to keep the dollar strong, all of these comments have not affected gold whatsoever. And the price of gold is to point out, even though it's up hitting new records all the time, we've got all the central banks continue to accumulate it, even though it

is hitting these record levels. The Federal Reserve Bank had a net loss on its balance sheets of nine and forty eight billion. The people that make the money actually lost money. And I know that escapes at the irony. I know to talk to Nancy Pelosi figure out how she does it. And one of the reasons why their net losers and they have to. They have to go against gold, didn't it? And the horses out of the barn.

You can't put this back. And this is why we talked about last week on on we hit a trillion dollars in debt in this country every ninety two hundred days. Now it's the wheels are off. You talk about Mike Johnson and whatever his budget is. You know, pray, tell Mike what war are you a wartime speaker of? As it's been announced it. I know it's not been voted on by Congress, but this is how these people think. It's unlimited. There's a printing press, we have it. We're the

world's reserve currency. You have Janet Yellen saying that there's three hundred billion that we've seized of Russian assets around the world through the Swift system and other financial networks that we're holding and were frozen. And that's part of the weaponization of the dollar. And no wonder the world's moving away from the dollar. We

don't have the rules are rigged against other countries. If you'd messed with the hegemonic dominance of the United States and our power, we're going to punish you. Well. I think bricks is the answer to that. The bricks wants to move away. They are moving away. It's really it's insane to watch in real time. And I don't think that the financial networks certainly don't get it. The majority of Americans don't get it because we've always been our lifetime,

we've been the world's reserve currency. You know, we've had the semblance of stability in that currency unit. But I think that is rapidly disappearing. You can see how just in look, gold was eighteen hundred dollars an ounce in the last quarter of last year. Yeah, yeah, it's twenty four It's close to twenty four hundred dollars an ounce. And the price for premiums on physical gold or even higher. So I want to caution your audience is

pay attention to this. I don't think this is this has very little to do with the actual markets. Like it's a hot market and there's things going and stocks are up or down. This is really outside of that. In my opinion, I think the thing we saw last week, you know, we saw the stock market get affected by this, we saw bitcoin get affected by we didn't see gold get affected by That's the tell the bitcoin ETFs.

Of course, there's a having coming up here in a few days. Basically every four years, the price it cuts in half of what is rewarded for minors. That's called a bitcoin having. There's a little price pulled back before then. But bitcoin ETFs, there's a lot of the outflows into those ETFs have slowed. Everything's slowed down. The markets slowed down across the board, but gold kept climbing, it kept going and staying steady. Right now I'm

looking at it's green across the board of gold and silver. Silver's finally starting to have its day, I think, and I know people that have been following the silver for years. It's just so boring. It doesn't move. I think that's a good thing. Honestly. It's kind of an inversion of actual value. But there's I think there's going to be a deficit this year, David talking about silver, there's going to be a deficit of close to

two hundred million ounces. Wow. And they've been running close. They've been running deficits for years now. The actual above ground stock versus what gets put into the actual circulation and what is demand for physical silver. We're seeing a disparity. There a lot of things happening, and again, it's not going to end well for those who control the dollar system, and I think that's

going to affect us. And one of the ways that I'm preparing for it is to stay outside of that system, stay out as best as possible. Have things that are without counterparty risk, like gold and silber. Yeah. Absolutely, no matter what they do with interest rates. What I was saying earlier in the program, one of the guys with one of the big tea party organizations was saying, look, when Obama came in in two thousand and

nine, we had a ten billion dollar deficit. Now it's thirty four trillion, and so just think of it as these guys stealing your credit card, you know, and you had ten dollars on your credit card, and now you get it back after Obama, Trump and Biden stole your credit card for several years. Now they run up a thirty four thousand dollar bill on the

credit card that you only had ten dollars on when they stole it. And that's what's going on, and that's the thing that swamps any of these manipulations that they're doing in terms of interest rates, because there's so many other things that they're doing as well, like the sanctions that also mitigate against the dollar as well. It truly is amazing. And then when you look at inflation, Biden is out there saying, you know, they're handing subsidies to companies

to try to get manufacturing here. He wants to go up significantly on tariffs for steel coming from China. He wants to triple them. Trump wants to do the same type of thing. But that's not really they're not getting to the root cause of it. Why is our steel more expensive. It's not just labor costs. Even more important than the labor costs are the energy costs. And they've shut down the last steel plant in the UK a couple of

months ago because they can't compete with China. China gets cheap, dirty energy, We get virtually no energy, they call it clean and we get incredibly expensive bills, and so we can't compete with them. And it's really amazing to see somebody like Biden, who says absolutely no respect for individual liberty,

has no understanding or comprehension of free markets. He thinks that he can fix all this stuff that he can, you know, and make our electricity, our energy incredibly rare and expensive, and then solve it by putting tariffs on China. It's just crazy. It absolutely is great. And again you go

back to this is a principle of economic nationalism. We abandoned those principles decades and decades ago, and really accelerating after World War Two, we opened up our markets to rebuild Japan, to rebuild Germany, and you know, thinking about the Chinese steel markets, which was fledgling in the nineteen nineties. It was December eleventh, two thousand and one when George W. Bush gave China most Favored trading status and entered him into the WTO. And after that we

lost fifty five thousand factories and one in three manufacturing jobs. And of course it didn't help. They got a lot of free steel from Rudolph Giuliani giving all the World Trade Center still to China, getting there as fast as possible after nine to eleven. So I'm sure that helped them a lot, get some free get some some steal back into their coffers. That's all. That

is a part of the program to de industrialize the United States. And there'll be some political you know, back and forth, and we can put a tariff up, which I think tariffs work. I mean, all four presidents on Mount Rushmore agreed on tariffs. All the figures on our paper currency, from the one dollar bill to the one hundred dollars bill all agreed on tariffs. Free trade really is mostly a fantasy, because if every nation on Earth

had economic parity, then free trade would work. But unfortunately, what you do is you incentivize the country, our companies, multinationals to leave their country of origin, go somewhere else and export it and push it into that market because they don't want to have to deal with regulations and taxes and you know, any sort of environmental concerns. And it's like a Darwinian contest. You throw these workers into and our leaders again, so called leaders, I don't

think they even understand what I just said. I mean, you talk about NAFTA, a ross pros that it was going to be a giant sucking sound. Yeah, pretty much, and that's what it did, and millions and millions of jobs. You look at the profits of multinational corporations after and after it's up into the right and wages for average Americans is stagnant or down. And of course with you add inflation to that, David, a loss of

purchasing power of your dollar. We really are becoming a nation where it's it's, you know, a ruling class of have and have nots, and the middle class is dissipating. Oh yeah, all that all that by design though you know again this there's always going to be countries that compete with us. But why don't why don't we compete here? The answer is not necessarily going

after one nation at all. Like and that's the thing is, I thought that targeted tariffs really are kind of more of an act of war than they

are any sort of economic strategy. I mean, if you're just singling out one particular nation, Pap Buchannan. Just if we're on the subject of tariffs, and you know, if you want to look at something that actually would work, if you put a twenty five percent tariff across the board on all incoming manufacturing, just across the board, anything manufacturing, twenty five percent tariff across the board, and eliminated the corporate income tax, the Internal and Corporate

Income Tact, you would incentivize companies to move here, put their factories here, employ employee Americans, and that would be revenue neutral, not that anybody cares about revenue anymore. I don't even think that's study that's right, But that's that's one way you could do it, don't I don't think that targeting a certain country is the way to go, and of course I don't think they think that's the way to go either. This is a lot of posturing.

Well, it's been their go to weapon against us when we look at the China price. Has always been about piracy, slave labor, It's been about currency manipulation. But now it's about and this is the other thing people we want to talk about the new China price. The new China price since the Paris Climate A Court has been their advantage in low cost energy, and that's going to be as big as these other things, perhaps as big as them combined. The fact that they have this big advantage and energy, and

so he's not going to do anything to address that. Instead, what he's going to do by tripling tariffs on a particular product from a particular country. What he's going to do is this kind of a virtue signaling, you know, like like Newsome, increasing the minimum wage for people who work at certain types of fast food restaurants, right, that's what they do, and we

know that that doesn't help anybody. You know, it's followed by layoffs, reduced hours, a lot of other things like that, and inflation, and so all this stuff is going to be followed by that as well. And so all these traditional things are back, and they're back, and you know, they're coming back at it big time. You know, the the embargoes on oil and the higher energy and all the rest of this stuff, and all these other aspects of inflation that they've built in with the low interest rates

and quantitative easing and printing of money and all that kind of stuff. But now there's other things that are out there, and that's you know, that's also what bothers me. I'm looking at biometric terminals that are coming out with EU regulations. They call it pay by face, and they want to get rid of cash. They also want to get rid of credit cards. Everything it's about you. You will be the thing that they track. You will be part of the Internet of things. And so I'm looking and I've been

looking at gold for a long time. It's just this thing that is outside of their system, something that is physical, something that is decentralized that's not under their direct control. And to me, that is as important as all these other economic issues that are starting to come home to roost as well. I agree with that one hundred percent. For some reason, they made me laugh at the biometrics and using your face that there's a funny a show called

Eastbound and Down. He said, this face used to cast checks used he was like a disgraced former baseball player, like I used to cast checks. And I think that that's going to be part of our future. This is and again it could be just all the controlled demolition to bring in the central bank digital currency its. It really is an open question of these people.

That's stupid. They they have to they have to have more sophisticated simulations that they're running doing the math, trying to add up like when does when do

we reach like a a you know, a point of no return. They have to have they have to have that somewhere in some underground think tank saying well when you when you hit this number, there has to be a number in which everything falls apart and they have to do some sort of reset, and of course they use that language is a great reset, and I think

more and more of the financial networks. You're starting to see chatter all over the place talking about a monetary reset, and when you're talking, you mentioned getting outside of the system. David, this has nothing to do with investment anymore. And I talked to people all day long and I said, look, you know there's people like Robert Kiyosaki, who I followed since my early

twenties. He's calling for his heels, sometimes saying it's three hundred thousand dollars bitcoin, but he's also saying, look, gold could crash to twelve hundred dollars an ounce, and could crash because so much of this is fake. How much of the paper, how much of it's tied to nothing, and we don't know, And so I think you're going to have to see a lot of this just come out into the wash. And you know, look back at the first quarter of twenty twenty, gold went to like eleven hundred

dollars an ounce, twelve hundred dollars an ounce. Silver was like twelve thirteen dollars. You couldn't get it for that. But I am cautioning people, I don't think this is some kind of like investment rally. I think what you're watching is something a lot more sinister. It's something very deep. It's it's much more deep than that. It's not about markets, it's about a complete change of the global order, right, That's what you're looking at.

And so when people call me and say we're you know what's going to go up? I don't know. I really don't know. I don't know what's going to go up. I do know where the dollar's going now. It's going to digital, and it's going to lose whatever current status it has right now. Every day that passes, there's more news that comes out that countries are moving away, dumping the dollar. Again, let's go back to this. The Federal Reserve lost money. The people that make the money lost almost

a trillion dollars. I mean, this is insane. So you can't trust that system. The mere fact that they can't go over this again and again, the mere fact that they can't do anything to affect the price of gold raising, lowering, hinting, it doesn't matter. It's on its own now, it's become organic. It's outside of their control. And you have to remember, the dollar inherently, since nineteen seventy one, is at war with gold. They've done. They did a pretty good job by the way of

covering that up for a long time. They went after in my opinions, my opinion, they went after the Hunt family in the early nineteen eighties to make sure that nobody cornered the silver market. Again. That exposes them, because it's not that hard to corner the physical silver market. I mean, you could you have a little if you're if you're an Elon must type or somebody even you know, a billionaire, you could corner the silver market.

It's not that hard. They exposed that, and then so they shut that down because it made the price of silver start really going up with fifty two dollars and fifty cents an ounce in nineteen eighty. So nobody did that.

And then gold, you know, gratered in the nineteen eighties because you had you know, it was mourning in America, and you had Art Laugher and the Laugher curve, and they're going to stimulate the economy through deficit spending and all this other stuff, and so it looked like that era was over. Well until it's not. And then you've spent too much. You know, again, it's a trillion dollars every one hundred days. So in my opinion, I think that entire system is coming apart. They're going to have to

reset somehow. Their war with gold it's continuing. I don't know what they're going to do about it. But every time the goal goes up that you see, you know this crate. I wouldn't have predicted these prices six months ago. I didn't say that. I mean, I thought we'd be in the two thousand, maybe twenty one hundred range. But to break into the

twenty's that's something. Twenty four hundred is something that I don't think even some of the most bullish analysts were saying that we were going to be in here at this stage in twenty twenty four. David, So something else is afoot? I agree. Yeah. I also talked about Tea Party organization guy earlier. We're talking about how it was out of control, and he's saying, you know, when you look at Trump, he looks at it like from standpoint of business managed so as well, if you go bankrupt, you just

declare bankruptc and you start all over again. Well, you can't do that with the country. So but he didn't address so what happens when the country is bankrupt. What happens when we can't service the debt, for example, And what happens is they completely reset the financial system. You know, that's where he stopped. He didn't talk about that. And how do they do that? Well, they just you know, completely wipe that out. Here's

the next new thing. How do they force people in it. I've got an article i haven't covered here where somebody's talking about, well, maybe it's going to be through the food supply, maybe you'll be through a some kind of bird flu pandemic. We got our because they're going to start registering all the backyard chickens and anything else like that that people have in the UK. Beginning in September. They're telling everybody we got this bird flu pandemic that's going

on right now. It's really serious. But you know, in three months or six months, it should say six months was when they said it. In six months, we're going to start registering all this stuff. It's like, well, it's serious, why don't you do it now? Same type of iterative gradual control that we saw throughout the COVID plandemic, they're going to start doing that as well. And so they said, well, so what happens when they go in and they say, well, we've got to kill

all the chickens and everything. Now everybody's starving. That's going to be a very effective weapon to try to force people into their currency. Right, I'll trade all this for food. And so when I look at gold, or when I look at backyard chickens, or when I look at solar that is off of their grid, you know, I don't like solar being used as an input into the grid, but I like it as a system that's off

to the side that gives you independence from the grid. You know, you look at all those things and they can be very expensive, and it's like, well, why would I bother to have chickens and I just go buy chickens or go buy eggs at the grocery store. The same thing with the power. Why would I spend more money for a solar system than this other stuff? Because you're preparing for what you think is going to come along.

And that's the real issue. That's as we're saying here, that's above and beyond all of these financial problems that are coming home to roost, and that is, you know what this control mechanism that I think they're going to try to get this done by twenty twenty nine. I think it's all going to happen in the next presidential term, regardless of which one of these clowns gets

a second term. Absolutely, wasn't it like one hundred and eighty different fires or planes flying into food distribution point and two different planes at the maybe three. And there's a lot of so many confidences, so many coincidences, and you know you have you have built, you have kill gates buying up all the farm land. Yeah. I saw a meme the other day and I thought it was great. Uh. I think it was depicting the Revolutionary War.

Maybe it was Boston era seventeen seventies. It had somebody getting tarred and feathered and it said that we need to make tax collectors birds. Again. Reminded me of that thinking about the backyard chickens. Uh, you know they will do that. I mean, and I think that all the test models from COVID nineteen eighty four were what will peop? Will people comply? And we found that out. All you have to do is give them a give them a Trump figure and say he's on your side. He's playing forty chess

that'll neutralized the people that generally would stand up to it. And you were so right this morning. You'd be so angry if this was Hillary Clinton, you'd be so angry if this was Barack Obama. But you're not. And that's the mind control here, and that's why I think we live in a world where you just what you just said is is could become a reality where they start going after anybody who's producing on their own, trying to get you under the guise of we have a we have a bird flu outbreak for our

own food supply, and we're in this together. They're going after any semblance of independence, and people would roll over. I think that's a large portion of them would and again not everyone, and there's a lot of people that are more awake. But we're we're caught an election year and it means nothing. It means nothing in my opinion. I'm not even I pay attention to it at politics anymore. For the for suns, SU's maximum know your enemy.

This is mind control, its psychological warfare. That's why I pay attention to it. But no, you're right, David, and our enemy has made their plans clear. They've even given us a rough timeframe which they want to do it conframe where they want to ban cars and ban other things and all the rest of this stuff. But you know, when you look at a situation like Amos Miller for example, right a local or state government can

make it worse or they can make it better. So what we can do is, and I think it is something people really need to think about, and that is to make sure that you've got things that are outside of their system, food, energy, wealth, and things like that like gold or silver that is outside of their system. And then of course make sure at the local level that you've got people who are not going to be worse than

the criminals at the top. These people have taken over our government, but you've got people who are gonna somewhat stand against that, even if they just passively don't comply. You know, if you've got people like that and you've made some preparations, that's kind of the best that you can do on a material secular basis. You know, certainly, you know, having a connection with God is going to give you a foundation there that's going to take you

through whatever comes. But from a secular, material perspective, I think the best you can do is prepare individually, and then from an election standpoint, if you can find any good candidates that are that you can support, that's good. And if you can't get out of that state, that's all the people. I do think that there will be more. They'll be better and better candidates on local level ballots. I think as we move forward, it'll

be a natural progression because it takes a while. I mean, the things that we're talking about are years out from being in the consciousness of the average even conservative person that listens to talk radio. We're not. We're way ahead of that. And again that they might catch up. They might not, but I think a good portion of them will. I mean, places like

Texas will have just because of the sheer fact that everything's being exposed. You have people like Greg Abbott busting up I legal aliens to Marthura's venue for political stunts or taking them to sanctuary cities and ignoring his duty, which is to secure the border in which the state he governs, and he has the app he has the duty, has the ability, has the power to do that, and he's tasked to do that. He does not do it, and

that's that's the Republican party in a nutshell. He'll do anything, but he'll he'll run any stunt, he'll try to score any points that he can. But I think that runs out and again when it becomes so bad, people will just have to they have to figure out another way. There has to be some sort of valve for that, and there will be. They'll be better and better candidates, but it's going to take. Unfortunately, the way

things work, it has to get worse before it gets better. And so I think just right now is a good time to prepare or change and one of the best ways you can do that is having backyard chickens. I love that idea. I've got backyard chickens. Love chickens, They produce eggs. They have something you know, uh looking at having precious metals, cryptocurrencies, a thing that's outside of the system. Cash. You know, having a

little bit of cash on hand is always good. I mean, I know I'm in the precious metals business, but I think there's a multi pronged way to just be in a better position for when things get a little bit more weird. And I believe yeah, and you know, it can be a little bit difficult to find good people, but a lot of times, you know, if it's somebody that's really good, the eye of Sarron will find them and identifying for you as well. You got somebody here just speaks up

at a school board meeting and the isr on focuses on them. That tells you right there, you know, we know the politics is local and they know it as well, and so you know they're going to focus and you see somebody who really gets the eyeball a Sarron on them, pay attention to that person, and a lot of times those people will move on to to run for office. We got the guy who's running for a governor now in North Carolina. He was he kind of elected as lieutenant governor last time.

He's got no background in politics. He's got nothing at all in his resume that would get him to be lieutenant governor governor except that he stood up and took these people on in a public forum over guns and over some other issues like that, and that made him a folkey row And he's got just general

good common sense, I think. So now he's running for governor. So sometimes you know, they focus on somebody like that and the next thing you know, they're a lieutenant governor and the next thing you know, they're running for governor. That type of thing can happen, and so you know, people can focus on that, but tell us a little bit about what's going on. As you know with this crazy gold market, what's going on with

Wisewolf, a lot of exciting things going on. Well, I tell you what, if things get worse, I might just run again just for the fun of it, to follow one of these establishment guys around and make their brain melt, you know, just like having to having to face these issues. The politicians don't like it when you actually know more than they do. Yeah, and they don't like having to answer questions. You know what we're

doing here, And just coming off of I flew back from California. I was out on Tenfoil Hat, which was a lot of fun, and we promoted wolf Pack there and Sam Tripoli's is somebody we loved a sponsor and they're spreading this around so we're helping more people. We've grown the pack significantly. We passed over a thousand members this last week, which I've been that has been my goal for so long. Almost I just could get so close, but we wouldn't hit it. We finally hit one thousand, so we have

a thousand members across the country. As you mentioned, it's like most of the country now. The states have no sales tax on gold and silver bullion and coins, and so that's great for us. Yeah, I talked about that yesterday. Forty five states now have. The latest one wis Kentucky overrid overrode the veto from Andy Basher, this horrible Democratic governor, one of the worst. Is almost up to the level of Whitmer during the pandemic. So

he fought that, but they overrode that. And there's only five left, and one of them is New Jersey. I think they'll probably do something to help bobbing into whether it's gold bars there, so that might be a ssue in there as well. I've got a question for you from a listener, Michelle Obama asks about I ask you if you can explain the Nevada goldbacks, who makes them and how do they work. Well, there's Nevada, Wyoming,

New Hampshire, Utah. These states respectively have a gold back made by a mint there that the state approves of and these are twenty four carrot gold notes. As a matter of fact, I was looking at gold telegraphs. Twitter today in Dubai has a new note. It's from the government. It's a twenty four carrot note. There's going to be other countries that do this. It's approximately like point zero one gram or something of in each note. So if you take that note and you melt it, you're going to get

that amount of gold. So you're walking around with not just you know, like a gold bar, but it's twenty four carret gold spread over this goal I wish I could get. I should have had one on hand get and they don't have a dollar denomination on them because it's always changing, right, So it's just a total it'll be it'll be measured, and yeah they haven't they have denominations, but it's it's basically measured in how much gold is in there. So it goes from like one to to five to tens and so

you'll have a little bit thicker note as it goes up. What wolf Pack does what I did, David is I just bought the one denominations, the singles, and and I just spread it over the different states. So I get all the different states with the one denominations and we put those in every single wolf pack. So if even one denomination is that, is it marked as one dollar? Is it marked as one you know some uh, you know it's marked it's marked as like a dollar, but that's not what it

means. It's it's kind of like how the the American silver eagles marked as a dollar, yeah exactly, yeah, yeah, or dimes or things like that. You know they have a yeah, but it's it's not translatable. It's again you're going to be looking at what the conversion rate of that is. And you can look at some of the online retailers like jay and Bullion and others they list them for like I think they're in the mid like six dollars and fifty cents range if you buy them with a credit card or something

like that. And we're under the into the five range for them, and when we put them in a wolf pack, so and they're not cheap. That they're not cheap, and there's only a few places that you can get them, but I think there's going to be more and more of a future form. It's not the best way to invest in gold, but it's a great way to have something outside of the system for trading, for bartering for

smaller items. As a matter of fact, I was going to tell you one of the things that I've been telling people right now is if you're able to get gold and hold it for the long term, one of the best things you can do is buy fractional gold. In my opinion, because again we're looking at the gold price. If you're able to get ten thounced gold coins that's about the size of a dime. You can get ten thoundced gold coins right now and hold them. You've got a divisible because it's going to

cost you around three hundred dollars. You've got a divisible trading piece that you can use. It's actually could be like this is the week's worth of groceries, and it's in a dime size instead of being in a one ounce coin. So if you can hold it for the long term, and that's one of the great things about wolf Pack is we save you a significant amount on items like that. Whether it's a tenth ounce and I say one tenth one tenth of an ounce bar or coin. We usually start putting those in the

in the wise wolves which is the five hundred and up. You start getting gold in the alpha, which is the two to fifty that's the gram bars. But I bet some of the best ways to get fractional gold is through wolf Pack right now and I'm doing Inframerger, but that's one of the best ways because we buy them in bulk and then and then beat the other online retailer significant. Yeah. So I think, you know, when we're talking about these gold backs and stuff, you just kind of think of them like

you would at Kennedy half dollar that's not worth fifty cents anymore. That's I used to have a lot of those. And if we go back to having some things like a you know, gold that's the size of a dime and buy a week worth of groceries, and you go back to where it was when my parents were kids, where they could actually get a week's worth of Grossly, somebody put up a meme the other day. I wanted to correct them, but I didn't have the heart. But they it was it should

have been. They just got it wrong on what the bar was. It should have been like ten ten ounce bars of gold. It says like ten of these would have bought you a median priced home in the nineteen twenties, and then it shows in today's world says ten of these will buy you a medium priced home in the in the twenty and twenty four. Yes, because gold just held its value. It's the currency that was separated from that value and then used, you know, over and over again and printed into oblivion.

That's debased itself. And so yeah, if you just as a store of value, Gold's just a good thing to have. Silver is a good thing to have. I think a silver because is so undervalued, and we hit a little bit on that today, but it's gonna be like two hundred million ounces deficit this year on above ground supplies versus demand. I think we're gonna there's a lot of reckoning happening in the commodities markets, and we're trying to prepare for that. The prices are moving all over the place. But

wow, we're definitely meeting the challenge. I think, Dave, well, that's great, and of course you can find you can get to Tony, go to David Knight dot Gold. I'll take you to Wise Wolf Gold. Get in on the He's now got over a thousand people with wolf packs. So you get in with that buying group and that helps you to buy smaller quantities and get a better price on smaller quantities because you're part of the bigger group there and so. But he can handle gold or silver orders at any

size. So I've known Tony for a long time. I've seen articles this last week, Tony where they say, well, key thing is got to now everybody's jumping into gold thing and everybody's paying attention to it. So there's going to be some scammers out there. Make sure you're dealing with somebody that has been around for a while that you know that's the key thing. So thank you so much for what you do for us. Thank you for your

support. And you've got a program it's coming up after this program, don't you, Yes, sir, I'll bet at eleven am Central time the Arderburn Radio transmission Rock Finn I'll be live on Freeworld dot FM and and my Twitter come join me over there. All right, sounds great, Thanks again, Tony, and folks will be right back. Stay with us, joy listening to the David Knight Show. Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels on our

app at apsradio dot com. All right, welcome back, as I was talking before about the pandemic, and I do want to get back to this because this is an article I see happening everywhere. Now Rampaul has made the rounds with Tucker Carlson, He's being focused on by pretty much every conservative media. This is penned all day yesterday at zero Hedge headline, we have fifteen thousand samples in Wuhan could do full genomes of seven hundred covids. Rampaul drops

a COVID bombshell. Now, all that is fine, and I have opposed since twenty fourteen, and it was basically, you know, what woke me up to what was happening with this stuff was Alison Young's series of articles on USA Today about accidents down at the Tulane National Primates Center. But then she

saw, well, this is happening all over the place. We've got two hundred or so of these labs that are you know, affiliated with universities, biosafety level three and biosafety level four four being the highest, you know, the most dangerous stuff that they're working with, and all these different accidents where they've got infected animals with very serious diseases escaping from the lab. Where you got the disease being found outside of the lab, which is what happened in

Tulane the Primate Center. People who go down there from the CDC to investigate it, one of them got sick and they say, oh, what's it? From this? They must have been a prior exposures like that, people who are working in the labs having faulty equipment and getting exposed to it, and then they could pass on to other people. So these things are not only a waste of money, but they're very dangerous. And following those stories, it got a lot of attention and it was picked up by Congress,

and they told Fauci stop it. That told Francis Collins stop it. And so then they started continuing to do that in China, continued to do it even at the University of North Carolina, one of the domestic labs that they continued to do it in defiance of Congress, Ukraine other places like that where they're running this stuff. I do not support gain of function research, but

folks, this is a red herring. And I say that because rand never talks about the JAB, he never talks about the ventilators, he never talks about rim dezevir, he invests in rimdesivir. He said, these officials knew the Chinese lab was proposing to create a COVID nineteen like virus, and not one of these officials revealed this scheme to the public. In fact, fifteen agencies with knowledge of this project have continuously refused to release any information concerning the

alarming and dangerous research. Well, I'm glad that they failed, and they did fail because, as I pointed out before, the excess DE'THS began with the vaccine, the vaccine is the bioweapon. And to continue to talk about this lab in Wuhan is a deliberate political ploy. It is a deliberate red herring and it really gets me out. He won't talk about the JAB, he won't talk about Trump, and he wants to give cover to all the

people who participated in this. That's what's really going on. And so, as I was talking to Tony this article out of expose a news you have. Will a false bird flu pandemic be the end of animal agriculture and will it be used to usher in food rationing? And also CBDC right, sorry, we don't have any more food, but we'll give you some food.

If you've got this code, you remember it's Anybody who's familiar at all with the Bible knows the story about the massive famine and Joseph and how he got in on the good side of Pharaoh and told him that coming up, you know, there's going to be seven years of plenty and then seven years of famine and that type of thing, and so Pharaoh put him in charge, and he stored all this stuff up, and then in order to survive, people had to come and you know, they were the only ones with any

food, and they had to buy the food from them, and after a while nobody had anything left and they sold themselves into slavery. This, I believe is what they want to do. And the overhyped threat of a human bird flu pandemic is a hoax to reset our food system, argues Alexis Baden Mayor and a sub stack, and I agree with that. I think it is a hoax. I think it is another one of these things that we've got all these coincidences, as Tony was talking about, of you know,

accidents at places where there's a lot of food being produced. We've had the biggest fire they've ever had I think in Texas where the most of the cattle was burning up, cattle, burning up the grasslands where they feed them. It's just amazing to see how much of our food infrastructure is being taken out

by quote unquote accidents over and over and over again. And then there's the fear every year now this bird flu coming out and killing millions, tens of millions of birds everywhere, shooting the price of eggs up, shooting the price of chicken up, and all the rest of this stuff. And you have to ask yourself, you know, what are they practicing, because they do

practice this stuff, and they do create an expectation with people. Oh yeah, that bird flu thing that's been getting worse every year, isn't it Now it's just taken out everything. Yeah, moving the Overton window, you know, people's uh, they move the window so they can defenestrate us, that they can throw us out the window. They're gonna they are gonna throw us out the Overton window, you know, that's the plan. The response to

bird flew outbreaks so far been to kill healthy birds and masks. There will come a time when the only alternative to the mass culling of birds will be to vaccinate them, and we'll have to have all the you know, all the birds have to be vaccinated, and we'll have to kill all the birds that aren't vaccinated. Well, they're going to say, right, because even if they this is the other thing that they've built the expectation for with everybody.

Your vaccine doesn't protect you, it protects other people. See if until we always used to say about measles and stuff like that, it's like, okay, well, if you think it works and you think it's the right thing for you, go ahead and get it. I will tell you otherwise. But you don't have to listen to me. I'm not your doctor, and you know I'm not arguing that government should keep you from getting measles vaccine

or an MMR vaccine. I'll talk to you about autism. I'll talk about the harmful adjuvants that they put into it and all these other things, and how you don't really need to take that risk. But they won't go with that. No, No, everybody has to get vaccinated. It's like, no, if your vaccine works, you're protected. They have used that now for such a long time that is very easy for them to sell the idea well, I could get my COVID shot, but I'm still going to get

sick if you don't get a COVID shot. I can wear my mask, but I'm still going to get sick if you don't wear a mask. And they're going to use the same thing. You know, your chickens are going to have to be. If you've got backyard chickens, you better register them with us, and you better get them vaccinated because if you don't, your backyard chickens will kill our chickens. I got an idea, We'll just outlaw

all backyard chickens. How about that that'd be better, right, So the people who run the vaccine is the big pharmaceutical companies, will be their partner in all of this. Creating food shortages could result in food rationing, which would then be the easiest way for them to get people to adopt the digital IDs linked to the cbdc's things get bad enough, you literally sell yourself into

slavery, like everybody did at the time of Joseph. And they've already planned this, as I said, you know, were in March they were saying, come September in the UK, you're going to have to register your backyard chickens, so they substacked by Lexus baden Mayer. There's all the hype about whether the bird flu will become a human pandemic might just be a distraction.

There are certainly pharmaceutical companies that would benefit from a human bird flu pandemic, but the industry might make even more money preventing a human pandemic by vaccinating farm animals, especially the world's thirty three billion chickens. Yeah, they could sell

more vaccines. If there's a vaccine, if there's a shot for every chicken, they can make you sell more units of that than if there's a shot for every human being. We've only got about what eight billion people, but we got thirty three billion chickens. So far. The government's response to the bird flu has been to kill millions of chickens. Eighty five point nine million birds killed since twenty twenty two, and it so it's become an annual ritual.

Frankly, you know, we got to kill healthy birds. We look at what happened in Norway with the lockdowns. Brownstone Institute has the article a retrospective of the Norway Lockdowns. History has never seen anything like the globally coordinated lockdowns. This is what I always and as a matter of fact, and when I talked about this ridiculous thing, Fauci didn't do it. Guess who

did it? You know, watch my little twenty five minute video and I'll tell you that it wasn't Fauci. And of course we know it can't be Trump. It could never be Trump. That's unthinkable that it could be Trump. Unthinkable that it could be the guy who was in charge, the guy who appointed these people, who left them in place, and who left not only Foun't you, but left Burks in place as well. Now there's got to be several levels down. And I said, this is ridiculous. This

is globally coordinated. Everybody was doing the same thing in every country, every Western country. So to say that it's Burkes, you know, it's not. You know, the presidents and leaders, you know, Trudeau and Trump are are responsible, but they're not the ones who are running it. There are people above them, part of the global governance that's already in place,

that was running it. It was globally coordinated lockdowns of mid March twenty twenty, all at exactly the same time, doing exactly the same thing with nearly every nation in the world simultaneously jettisoning its laws and its liberties in favor of an experiment without precedent, one without a clear goal or an exit strategy. Well, the only way that the only place where I disagree with that the Brownstone Institute. It did have precedent, and it did have a clear goal,

and it did have a clear strategy to exit. The strategy to exit it was the JAB and they even said that, and of course that was what they had practiced from Dark Winter two months before nine to eleven. All for twenty years, the practiced this, We're going to lick everybody down, create a fast vaccine emergency thing, and everybody's going to have to take that to get out of lockdown. So that was the precedent, these games that

they practiced for twenty years. That was the exit strategy, and that was the goal. The goal was not just to vaccinate and kill people the vaccine. The goal was to establish the political power to do that as well. But it is interesting to see what's going on with the Norwegian lockdowns, and I'm glad that they pointed out that it was March twenty twenty. Everywhere nation

that did this at the same time simultaneously. So the Norwegian Commission pointed out that scenarios for serious influenza pandemics had already been drawn up in their country as well. Isn't that interesting? But not even for their worst case scenario with up to twenty three thousand dead Norwegians were the dramatic measures that we experienced under the so called Corona pandemic. They didn't even recommend that stuff for their games.

So they were wargaming about an influenza epidemic, just like the United States was, But unlike the United States war games, their war gaming even if they had twenty three thousand dead Norwegians, which is, you know, they

have much much, much smaller population we do. I don't know what percentage that is, But even with that, they would not roll out these things, but we would, you know, we did have that in all of these germ games Dark Winter on. So why was Norway shut down on the twelfth of March twenty twenty, I tay you, you know, you look at the time frame differentials and anything, it's almost exactly the same hour that

we do our stuff. On the sixteenth of March twenty twenty, the Imperial College of London published an article which recommended a knockdown strategy based on computer models. But of course they had already had the other computer model that was about lockdown, and it was a pre print of that that Trump said, two very smart people meeting Fauci and Burks showed this to me. So that's what

I did it on thirteenth. On the twenty fourth of March, the Norwegian government announced that it had switched to a knockdown strategy, where the goal was that every infected person would infect fewer than one person. Their initial simulation was that every person would infect two or more two to two and a half people, and it would do it forever. As I said many times, the fundamental model that the Imperial College of One had was in denial of everything that

epidemiologists had ever seen with any kind of a disease outbreak. The reason we talked about flat in the curve was because there was a curve that associated with every kind of outbreak. I mean, whether it is cholera or whether it was chicken pox or whatever, they would always have this bell shaped curve.

And that goes back to the eighteen thirties. A guy named Farr identified that, and so the curve was called Farre's law, but their model didn't have that, you know, it was like, we're going to affect every person gets infected, is going to affect another two and a half people forever. And so then they came up with another one a few days later, Well, every person. The goal is that an infected person will infect fewer than one person. So if it's fewer than one, it's going to just like

our reproduction thing. You know, if you have less than to slightly over two children per bearing woman, your population is going to continue to go away very rapidly. So that's what they're looking at with a virus. That was going to be their goal. According to the Director of Health in Norway, the Imperial College Report changed the way of thinking for the entire Western world. The commission that is looking at this now in retrospect in Norway, and you

do have some of these commissions. There's an inquiry going on the UK and Norway some other places like this, and a lot of times these commissions are or these inquiries are done like the jfk assassination thing, it's just there to do a cover up. Many times that's the case many times, even if they come up with a recommendation that'll be ignored. You had a commission that was put together after they had climate Gate, which began in the UK at

the University of East Anglia, and there were damaging admissions. As these emails were released, we got to hide the decline, our models are not working. On and on put together this commission, and the public was really upset about that. The purpose of the commission was to tell people that's okay, really it's still a real problem, and that was what they did, was a propaganda move to do a cover up of how these people rigging the data

and to assure the public that this climate alarmism was real and justifying. So this commission is critical of the way in which the decision was taken. In the closure of the twelfth of March twenty twenty, it appears the Directorate of Health made this decision, Brownstone says. The commission points out that this should

have been made by the government. Well, not even the government should have that kind of power to do that, And they say the commission believes that the government should have made more thorough assessments against the Constitution and against human rights and the Infection Control Act. In Norway. Proportionality is a central concept. So what they're saying is the way they they overreacted to put it mildly,

and so you have to keep this in proportion. And as other people have said, and it needs to be repeated all the time, the Constitution doesn't go away when there's a virus out there, or disease or something like that going around. It doesn't go away. Except they have now essentially established that the Commission criticizes a government for having exercised too strong central control. And of course you know how they do that here in the US. It's done with

the money. It's done via money, it's done the plans that were long laid in the state. That is exactly how they run this stuff through. So they finish up the article, Brownston saying, in my opinion, it seems obvious that the authorities pandemic management was an ethical, social and economic abuse of the population, albeit to a lesser extent in Norway than in many other countries, and it must never happen again. Well, except that we're going

to have a second term. Of the two guys that did it, right, one of these two guys that did this to us, we're going to give them a second term. And everybody's whipped up in such a frenzy that we imagine it'll just be the end of the world if one of these guys doesn't get elected for us. I mean, you know, the people who support Biden, if Trump gets elected, that's the end of everything. The people who support Trump, if Biden gets elected, that's the end of everything.

These two people responsible for the end of everything pretty close to it, and in their second term, that'll be what they're working on, the end of everything. The question is not who are you going to vote for for president, but who does the I and the pentagram want for president? Who do they think is going to be their most useful puppet to get this stuff run through. That's the real issue. That's what this is really about. As well. There's no election except at the local level. You need to

understand where this really is now. Part of that, when we talk about the pandemic, part of that is universal basic income, of course, and there's been several articles picked up. Actually they all come back to an article from state Line by Kevin Hardy talking about how conservative states are pushing back against UBI because and they kind of quote one guy in North or South Dakota. He says, you know, I don't like to introduce a lot of laws.

He's my kind of legislator. I'm not one who's always introducing laws. But I try to look and see trends that are out on the horizon, what's happening in these other places that are bad, and try to prevent it. We got a lot of people like that here in Tennessee. Frankly and yeah, frank nicely, Frankly who is looking at stuff like that, and other people as well. And that's a good thing. They're proactive. They see the stuff coming and sometimes they shut it down even before it hits the

state. But when we look at universal income, this is something that was sold by Bloomberg when he was running for president. He said, look, and everybody got upset with him because you just dissed and disrespected farmers. You called him stupid. Well, he was saying, you know, we used to have everybody doing farming, and we replace that. Then we got everybody working in factories. And now the smart people like me, the smart ones

of us, are working to take everybody's jobs. And we just got to figure out how we are going to keep these people from who've lost their job and lost their income, lost their ability to feed themselves and their family. How are we going to keep them from grabbing guillotines and coming for us. He used that phrase guillotines, and everybody ignored that, said he just disrespected farmers. Yeah, he disrespected all of us. He wants to make all

of us slaves to him, and so he was pushing that. Andrew Yang was pushing universal basic income. That was his single issue when he began, and Elon Musk gave him lots of money because Elon Musk is all about universal basic income as well. So is Sam Altman, the guy who is now running open Ai, the guy who also has his world coin thing. Yeah, just we got this thing looks like an eyeball and you just stare into it and it gets your biometric information about your retina or whatever, and we'll

give you a little bit of a coin. You know, just sell your freedom, your inheritance of freedom. Just just sell it for a bowl of porridge. Here, just look into this little orb. And so it's it's pretty widespread with a lot of the technocrats. But of course it was a precedent that was also helped along by Donald Trump. Never before in history have we had people be able to stay home and collect a check for doing nothing. And he didn't have to qualify. It went to everybody. Everybody got

that stimulus check. Everybody needed to stay home. And so this is another president that Trump did you know, moving the universal basic income, moving the Overton window for everybody. As a technocracy dot com says, the universal basic income movement is global, is being pushed straight from the top at the UN. What they don't say is that a person who pushed it and who established

that precedent was Donald Trump. In twenty twenty, how South Dakota State Senator John Wilke likes to think of himself as a lookout, keeping an eye on new laws, programs, and ideas that are brewing across the states. He said, I don't bring a ton of legislation. The main thing I like to do is to try to stay ahead of friends and try sorry, trends not friends. I like to stay ahead of trends and try and prevent bad

things from coming into our state this session. That means sponsoring successful legislation banning cities or counties from creating universal basic income programs. And let me just comment, this is again, this is on state line publication looking at what's happening at states. This is a global agenda's technocracy at technocracy dot compoint. This is coming from the un on down. We all know what this is about. We've all seen it. They've given us some rough time frames they would

like to get this through. How do you stop it at the state and local level. You have to understand what the global plans are, but you understand that where the rubber meets the road is at the state level. The globalism is only going to be blocked at the local and state level. You're not going to have people like Mike Johnson or Donald Trump or Joe Biden block it. They're going to help it. They're going to help it. The solution is not in the district of Columbia. The solution is not in the

oval office with a president. The solution is going to be done in at the state level and or the local level. While wilk isn't aware of any local governments publicly floating the idea in South Dakota, he says such programs as bureaucrats trying to hand out checks to make sure that your party registration matches whoever signed the checks for the rest of your life. That's the way he phrases

it. That's right. They want to make you dependent. That's always been the purpose of welfare, and the purpose of central bank digital currency is the same as welfare for all. And it truly does amaze me to see libertarian economists, people who have in the past warned us about the welfare state, Murray, who wrote books about that that were the basis of used for welfare reformed by conservatives in the nineteen eighties, now becoming Charles Murray, now becoming

a supporter and a pusherl bank digital currency. It is a Marxist system of welfare, just like the systems that he used to oppose, but he's allied himself with the technocrats. The economic gut punch of the pandemic, No, it wasn't a pandemic. It was the government action that they tried to justify by fake pandemic. But it was an economic gut punch and expanded many things, not just a stimulus check, but the child tax credit, all these

other things. But it directly handed cash to people from the federal government who just puts it on their tab. South Dakota is among at least six states where GOP officials have looked to ban basic income programs. The basic income concept has been around for decades. In twenty nineteen, they did an experiment in Stockton, California. By the way, Stockton, California was the first municipality

to go bankrupt. So but they still have all these bankrupt democrat ideas is and they select one hundred and twenty five individuals to get five hundred dollars a month with no strings attached for two years. But you know they can't afford to do that. And once you start this stuff then it becomes very difficult to stop it. They quote I Ronald Reagan who said the closest thing to eternal life on this planet is a government program. It's absolutely right. We'll

be right back. Elvis a Beetle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at apsradio dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Welcome back on rock Fan Jason Barker, good to see you there at Nights of the Storm and Foxhole Report, and of course he has Knights of the Storm with Angry Tiger who has a snake in Tiger Financial Report, Jason says, when I lived in Japan, they had a tax on all imported American cars. We had little to no tax on their cars coming

in, and it was killing our industry. Yeah, talk about asymmetry that is happening there. And of course it was the type of thing that that went on for a long time, and with a lot of different types of goods, not just cars. When you look at the European tax structure, the value added tacks that they have, where there is a tax, a sales tax that is added at every stage of production or you know, when you hand it off to somebody else and they do something else with it.

At every stage you have a tax, whereas here with a sales tax, you only pay the tax at the final sale. There they had a tax at every level, and so it got to be very expensive, and they would make sure that if their goods were going to be exported, whether it was a car or a candy container. If you've ever been to Europe, you know you could say, well, you know I'm going I'm shipping this to the US. Oh okay, well you get a VAT credit or you

don't have to pay it or something. They fill out a form and give them a passport number. Well, the same thing was happening with the cars. The cars would arrive without any taxes on them, whereas if we were

selling, we would put that kind of penalty on American cars. The American government would put a penalty tax penalty on American cars, you know, the American car companies would have to pay their income taxes and other things like that, and those cars would go abroad having not only the American taxes, but

the taxes that were imposed on them in foreign countries. And if they're very protective, like Japan with a one hundred percent tax, right, they get one hundred percent tax plus all the American taxes are on that car as well. Yeah, we've been playing stupid for a long time, really long time. On Rock Fin Andromeda one, thank you very much for the tip, and Eric thank you as well. And on Rumble, Milton Friedman two is

now a monthly supporter. Thank you so much. I appreciate that. Let's do an update here. I talked a couple of days ago about what happened. I think when was it over the weekend or something where that Bishop and Australia was attacked. Bishop mar Maury Emmanuel is his name. He was stabbed multiple times during a live stream Sidney and Sydney at the church service. He's

been in stable condition. And when you look at that and you when you first look at that video, and it's truly horrific, and I wonder if he survived that. Well, yeah, and he's in stable condition. As a matter of fact, the Guardian instead of saying this person who allegedly stabbed, they usually put allegedly there until somebody has been convicted of something, but not there with the victim, and so they put that he was allegedly stabbed. No, he was really stabbed. The question is who did it.

But we've got the video so we pretty much know who did it. And then of course the Guardian other media turned around and attacked this guy because they said that he's transphobic, he's an anti vaxer, all the rest of this stuff. Allegedly stabbed. So, speaking from his hospital bed on Thursday morning, the bishop delivered a message to the attacker. I say to him, you're my son. I love you and I always pray for you. He said an audio message. Whoever sent you to do this, I forgive them

as well. In Jesus Mighty name. I have nothing in my heart but love for everyone. Whether that person is a Christian or not, is totally beside the point. The Lord Jesus always taught us to love one another. And for this young man, I say to you, you're my son. You always will be my praise in the name of the Lord Jesus. He said to him, Well, when you look at what happened, and of course no charges have been laid against him, yet they've got counter terrorism.

A police or there there finally came around to saying it was a terrorist attack because he's shouting alahuakbar as he stabbed him. But he said to undergo surgery because he cut off one of his fingers. Now, I wanted to wait a little bit to try to get some clarity on this. Some people reporting that he had several fingers cut off. Other people reported that he had cut off one finger. Other people said that his switchblade had not opened up properly,

so the first few stabs that he got in didn't count. Here's the video of this again, and he's attacked there. He did get the blade out, he did stab this Bishop and other people who were trying to stop him, but it could have been worse because he first came after him with

his face, but he did not have the blade deployed. So the response of the premiere there in New South Wales said that what needs to happen is we need to have social media platforms need to be held to account after this, and they need to be held to account because they show people what I just showed you. That's the problem. See where the problem. It's not the newcomer, they're fine. Their response to everything is going to be censorship

of some way, control of some way. They want to control speech, not borders, and so that's where they are coming up. We've got to control that well. As people are looking at this, they point out this was something of a miracle, said one guy who was close friend of this guy who got stabbed as Bishop Emmanuel. He said, say from death because the alleged attacker's knife failed to open properly during the stabbing and the suspect cut

off his own finger in the botched attack. Close friend Danny Abdallah, spoke to the bishop as he recovered in hospital over night on Tuesday, revealed further details and had come to light he was The bishop was stabbed multiple times rushed to the hospital in stable condition. He appeared to strike the bishop a series of blows to the head and neck, repeatedly swinging down in a stabbing motion.

In the video clip, the alleged attacker pauses briefly to look at his hand before returning the attack, but was unable to properly open the knife. It's since been confirmed that the attacker cut off his own finger with the knife during the attack. Was that interesting, you know, God using the weapon against him. It's not a weapon, very much like the psalms and so many of those, you know, May he fall into the pit that he

dug for others. He the alleged knife and went for the face, and he was going for the face, but the knife didn't open, said mister Abdallah, who has spoken to this bishop in the hospital. So in California we have now they're going at California lawmakers veiled plans to try to move reparations along, and of course one of the real practical problems with these reparations is

even deciding who gets them right. Barack Obama is half white, half black, you know who, and there's even questions about who who is his father on the on the black side. Is it the guy from Africa or is it somebody from Chicago that's been identified by some people. You've got Angela Davis who is horrified to find out that both of her grandfathers were white. It says a black Marxist who has, you know, lived her life pushing racism,

and she's horrified to find out that she has she's half white. And then you have people like Elizabeth Warren. I don't know that reparations I don't think are going for Indians, but you know, she she might have some genealogy office looking into her if they do something like this in her neck of the woods. So California lawmakers unveiled plans for a genealogy office to decide which residents are genuine descendants of slaves and could get life changing benefit payouts. Well,

we already know that it's not going to include La La Harris. You know she didn't come from this country. It was her father, I think, was it Jamaica or something, bragged about the fact that their family owned slaves. So you know, she's got a mother from India, father from Jamaica, and his family owned the slaves. So she's going to have to pay for some of that. Well, that's Jamaica, it's not not in

California. But again, California never was a slave state either. And so the states First in the Nation Reparations Task Force last year decided that some residents should win one point two million dollar payouts as compensation for injustice from a slavery era onward. The purpose of this is to divide, it is device. It is going to be unjust. They're going to have people will be penalized

because of what their ancestors did. That's what this is about. This is the This genealogy office is the ultimate and this kind of maoist you know, civil war they want to create over race. It is absolutely unworkable besides being

unjust. But you know what is really sad about this is that if you look at some of the churches, I think it was in Boston where you had some of the churches demanding some black churches demanding that white churches pay them or something like that, And I said, do they not understand the fundamental, fundamental method a message of Christianity, which is exactly what this bishop was

saying. You know we forgive people. Why do we forgive people? Well, because if you're a Christian, if you're a black Christian and you're going to demand that white Christians pay you for something that you didn't do that you think maybe their ancestors did, you have Absolutely you're harboring unforgiveness in your heart and you are not willing to lay the things that have been done to you that you imagine actually they are done to your ancestors many generations back. You're

not willing to leave that at the cross. Well, then you're not going to be able to leave your sins at the cross either. The things that you have done. He died for what the wrongs that we did and the wrongs that were done to us. The churches don't understand that anymore. In North I'm sorry New Jersey, New Jersey, not North Carolina, New Jersey, you have student members of an unofficial club or under investigation for alleged racism.

What is this unofficial club? It is the White Student Union. What a It's not okay to be white. You know, That's one of the things I talked about seeing this happening at the University of South Fard in Tampa fifty years ago. When I was a student there, we had the Black Student Union, which is incredibly racist. We had the Gay Coalition. These two organizations were not only know the Black Student Union Gay Coalition exclusion, they

excluded other people, very divisive and they hung together. And even though it was a large student body of twenty five thousand students, they were able to hang together because most of the people were commuting students and didn't really have much connection to what was happening on campus at the time. That's changed now, I understand they've got sports teams and stuff like that. But at that point in time, they could hang together. They could make sure they won the

elections because nobody ever voted. I never voted in any of those elections.

I never knew when they were who was running in any of them. The only reason I knew about all this stuff or even knew about what happened with student government was because, you know, we had twenty five thousand students and everybody had to pay a student activity fee, and the student government got control of all those funds, and these guys with the Black Student Union and the Gay Coalition gave it to themselves, and there were some criminal allegations, but

they never convicted anybody. They got away with it. And I've been watching that same pattern in government for the last fifty years. So here's a white student union again. Yeah, racist, probably, But is it any different than the black student union. Probably not. But one form of racism has encouraged, the other is discouraged because they want to divide the country over race.

That's what Bill Airs Bernardine Dorn the weatherman underground. They knew they couldn't get a traditional Marxist revolution between different economic classes, so they wanted to do it over racial issues. In North Carolina, a high school student sixteen is suspended for saying illegal alien in class. He got suspended and it's on his permit record that he's a racist, and he was hoping to get a scholarship as a track student. He believes that this is going to keep him from

being able to do that. He questioned the term alien in an assignment. He says, does this referred to space aliens or illegal aliens without green cards? He's joking around and they didn't think that was funny. Should he use the term squatter? That's the better term anyway? I guess he wanted him to refer to him as newcomers. But perhaps he doesn't realize that this might

be the best thing that ever happened to him. If he doesn't go to college, if he thinks this is mad, you know, he gets labeled a racist and suspended from school for talking about using the term illegal alien. Oh well, he think is going to happen when he gets to college, I said earlier, you know, he had the South Dakota representatives looking at universal basic income, trying to shut it down before it gets to South Carolina.

Well, we have a people in Tennessee that are pretty proactive with things like this, and of course what we've seen happening in New York with squatters. We now have a Tennessee bill to protect property owners from squatters. I put this in here because again, whatever state you're in, you need to understand that the state can make it better or worse. Has anything been done in New York to stop their excessive squatter laws and you could go in and

if you're there for thirty days now you own the place essentially. And we've seen people in New York get arrested by the police because they try to get these squatters out, they take the side of the squatters. We've seen property owners in New York get killed by the squatters. So here in Tennessee,

they're trying to head this off. Home Ownership is the American dream for many, so State Representative Tim Rudd from Murphreysboro and a press release, he says, this proactive legislation that protects property owners but also deters bad actors who have learned to exploit the law and to terrorize homeowners. This creates a streamlined process

for Tennesseeans to quickly take back control over what is rightfully theirs. You see, you've got laws being drawn up in Tennessee maybe other places as well, to make sure that if somebody moves in, you streamline the process to get them removed. Whyas New York has done nothing. Nothing has been done in New York. They've got the worst laws to start with, and when I looked it up, I think in Tennessee they had to live there for seven

years before they could assert in any legal type of thing. But of course evicting somebody is a different situation. That's what they're trying to address with this, And so New York has done nothing about this. So I say, you can solve some of these problems at the state level, or you can make them worse. The press release says, the bill removes much of the burden from legitimate property owners by establishing a clear process for law enforcement to restore

possession. It cann expedite the removal of illegal occupants in as little as seventy two hours, and the legislation also clarifies that the sheriff may arrest the trespassers. Dishonest trespassers have learned to exploit the law in places like New York, where a squatter who occupies the home for at least thirty days can be granted tenant rights, says a press release. Lawful property owners are then forced to

go through a court eviction process to reclaim their homes. And so still nothing is being done in New York, but in some other states they're already working on it. This I thought was kind of interesting from a personal Standarin Red Lobster is considering Chapter eleven bankruptcy after they lost eleven million dollars. Most of that they said was because of their endless shrimp promotion. Wow, this is a jumbo shrimp problem. It got the shrimp problem got really really big,

so and when I saw this article, it hit with me personally. The chain started as a single restaurant in Lakeland, Florida in nineteen sixty eight, had about has about six hundred and fifty locations in almost all the states. And I worked at one when I was in high school in Tampa. That was near Bush Gardens on Bush Boulevard, and I had some friends who went

there got some jobs. They're getting paid pretty good. They're working in the kitchen or as dishwashers, and so I went there to apply for a job. Unfortunately, I went in wearing a white shirt and a tie, and you can be a bus boy. It's like what that doesn't pay as well? And I did that for about six weeks, I guess. And you know the thing is, I hate seafood. Anyway, I just went there

because my friends were working there in the kitchen. I thought I'd get a job with him, and I thought, all right, I'll give it a try. I needed the money, so the so I did that for just a short period of time. But I is something about the butter sauce or something had would get onto my shirt right above my pants, you know, when I'm carrying the busboy thing and my mom couldn't get it out even with bleach. What is this stuff? I said, I don't know, but

they're eating it. You know. It's one of these fast food things. The final straw was one waitress who was kind of crabby working at Red Lobster, and she did not get a tip at one of these tables, and she accused me of stealing her tip. It's like steal your tip, but you know, the person who was the manager there, she asked me about it. She didn't believe that I stolen it. But I said, well, if I'm even going to be suspected this, I'm done and I walked

out. You know. So so now they did their Endless Shrimp promotion. Evidently the shrimp was pretty good from because the people ate so much of it that put them out of business. And then we have this Boston Dynamics. Look at this. This is their new robot. You've seen the robot that does tumbling somersaults all the rest of us. Look at that. This is electric. Look at that it's coming to life. It's like something straight out of terminator. It's double jointed, it stands up the legs go backwards.

Now look at this. The head looks at you, walks towards you. Now the body turns around. Wow. Wow. And as one person said, just make sure that if that light you know, you look at the face there of Boston Dynamics. So it's got this big black circle as its head. Its head is like a cylinder. There's a big black circle, no eyes or anything like that, but just a white thing around it.

I said, if that goes red, you better start running. You know, I don't know what it is about Bostondynamics that they seem to revel and this kind of dystopian approach to their products. They like to do videos about that. They go out of their way to look sinister. Unlike you know, the one that we showed last week. You know what was Open Ai working with this company called Figure and you were teld to do something. It's

working out these puzzles. But it had this California dude kind of voice, Oh yeah, I got it, yoh okay, let me think sure, yeah whatever, you know that type of thing. And so they went out of their way to do that, even to have it say uh yeah, yeah, I could do that, you know. And so they're trying to create this esthetic that is, you know, this laid back California dude guy, which really has a cognitive dissonance with the robot thing there. But Boston

Dynamics just owns it. Oh, they want to go full terminator, and they are constantly pushing that. We designed the electric version of at List to be stronger, more dexterous, more agile. Atlas may resemble a human form factor, but we're equipping the robot to move in the most efficient way possible to complete a task, rather than being constrained by human range of emotion. Again, look at the way this thing stands up. At List will move

in ways that exceed human capability. You know, isn't that nice? They said they're exploring commercial uses for the new at List, beginning with Hyundai, which acquired the robotics firm in twenty twenty one. Competitor Agility Robotics has a partnership that lets Amazon use its biped robots called Digit to lift and to move items in some warehouses. Of course, they have this backwards insect kind of leg that you saw with that Charlie Sheen movie I talked about that. It's

amazing and then the dog, the dog that looks like it's stepped. Well, of course they use that form factor for black mirror, you know, looks more like an insect and middle insect that does a dog. Yeah, the future is kind of interesting, is think for joining us? Have a good day. Let me tell you the David Night Show. You can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the

David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else, You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.