15Sep23 New & Developing Tech to Watch/Control/Modify Us

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show. As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Friday, the fifteenth of September. Here of our Lord, twenty twenty three. Well, today we're going to take a short break from politics and we're going to talk about the implications of technology. But actually technology has now become political, hasn't it. It has now become a political weapon. Of course, technology is just a tool, but

it depends on who wields it and for what purpose. And so we're going to take a look at some of the tools that they're creating. We can imagine how it can be abused and based on who is creating it and who will control it, and get a glimpse as to where these people are going. We've always misunder estimate, as Bush would say, the evil and men's

hearts and the technology and their hands will be right back. Well, we'll begin when the example of what is happening as artificial intelligence is taking over journalism if you will, for profit. This is one of the reasons this is being put in and we had an amazing example of this and unfortunately it was part of an obituary. So this is not to make fun of the person who died, Brandon Hunter, the former professional basketball player, but it's to

show what artificial intelligence is doing. As you have Microsoft turning over their sports section to AI, and I just want you to remember that it was Microsoft they came out with news Guard, right, they're gonna guard us against disinformation, misinformation. You know, it's going to be very truthy. And then of course they also came out with Election Guard. Election Guard is operated on a ten million dollar grant from DARPA. So you have the intelligence community,

the Pentagon running our elections. If you hadn't noticed by now, but it is so in order to I'm wondering how NewsGuard is going to rate this Microsoft site. It's actually called race track. But of course there's no human identified in this. The byeline says a story is by editor. Just call him ed for short, I guess. And so here's the title about the death

of Brandon Hunter. Brandon Hunter useless at forty two. What now they took this down, but of course you can always find the archive of these things. And that's why they're going to take down the Internet archive. They want a memory hole everything. I'll just read it where he's very brief here, former NBA participant participant Brandon Hunter, who beforehand performed for the Boston Celtics and for Orlando Magic, has handed away, handed away. I guess it meant

passed away right on the age of forty two. I mean the English is just it's like a non English speaking person. I remember years ago Karen's brother as an artist, and he would participate in photoshop contests and stuff like this, very very creative stuff that was done. And this is about a decade

ago. Actually it's even longer than that, so maybe about fifteen twenty years ago, and it would never be allowed today, but they would have different themes and they would have people do joke photoshop stuff, and one of the themes that they did over and over again was English. You know when you get these instructions for some things made in China and they don't quite get the

instructions correct. And that's what this reminds me of the one I'll never forget what somebody made a tombstone or so it said, many saddenings for this extinguished gentleman. And that's the way this thing reads. So he was handed away on the age of forty two, as introduced by Ohio Males basketball coach M. A. L. E. S. Jeff Bowls on Tuesday. Hunter initially a extremely regarded high school basketball participant and again a highly regarded, not

an extremely, not an extremely, but a extremely highly regarded. They high school is one word that they put in there, not two words. He achieved vital success as a ahead for the Bobcats. They're trying to get out. Well, we'll show you what the original one was that it copied, because that's another key part of this. Not only is the corporations don't really care about anything. You know, here's Microsoft that created news Guard. They

don't care about any of that stuff. And they also don't care about plagiarism. Because this is what this is is outright theft and all that artificial intelligence did. It told a story and it sprinkled it's misconceptions about the English language throughout it. He earned three first team All MAC Convention alternatives and led the

alternatives and led the NCUBA in rebounding throughout a senior season. Hunter's expertise led to his choice because the fifty sixth General decide within the two three NBA draft. Throughout his NBA profession, he performed in sixty seven video games over two seasons and achieved a career high of seventeen factors. Seventeen factors and a recreation and opposition to Milwaukee Bucks in two thousand and four. Well, so what

did this originally come from? Not only is it incredibly stupid sloppy work, but it's actually plagiarism Microsoft's ms N news portal for sports racetrack Uh huh yeah, kind of like a warp speed version of the news a garbled, seemingly AI generated article yeah right, that derided Hunter as useless in his headline. One person said AI should not be writing obituaries. Pay your writers, MSN, and one person said the most dystopian part of this is that AI,

which replaces us, will be as obtuse and stupid as this translation. Yeah, maybe AI should stand for autonomous idiocracy. And but for the money men, they said, they don't care. It's enough. It's enough to have something like this just to put the content out, and Futurism comments and says it's not the first time that Microsoft, a major backer of chat, GBT

and open AI, has embarrassed itself. Where AI generated content on MSN, it made headlines last month after publishing a similarly incoherent AI generated travel guide for Ottawa, Canada that bizarrely recommended that tourists visit a local food bank, and then they deleted that article as well. The article was not published by an

unsupervised AI, said the senior director at Microsoft at the time. In this case, the content was generated through a combination of algorithmic techniques with human review. Really, well, it's hard to believe that a human would not see something like that. The full story is that back in twenty twenty, MSN fired the team of human journalists responsible for vetting content published on its plindform.

As a result, as Futurism reported last year, the platform ended up syndicating a large number of sloppy articles about topics as dubious as bigfoot and mermaids, which is then deleted after we pointed them out on their about us page. It ensures the content that we show aligns with our values through human oversight. Futurism said that strains credibility take the original publisher of the piece on Hunter's death,

a publication going by the name of Racetrack. Red flags abound, starting with the fact that its articles are bylined simply by the anonymous editor, and despite having almost one hundred thousand followers on Facebook, the site's content gets almost zero engagement. There probably just people going for a laugh. One particularly ridiculous article profiles a quote Corridor of Fame. See, it's been told it's gonna copy this stuff from other people and plagiarize it, but it's got to make

a few changes. So instead of calling it a Hall of Fame, it calls it a Corridor of Fame. And so in this article about Corridor of Fame, they profiled a football player that they called Pleasure Taylor, which is actually the NFL Hall of Famer Joy Taylor. So you change hall to corridor, and you change Joy to Pleasure. That makes perfectly good sense. You know, we went to China, what was it about fifteen sixteen years ago, I don't know, but you know, we went there to adopt our

daughter. They had you know, piracies and aim of the game there and plagiarism and copyright stuff, and I actually had to I bought this thing. I thought it was so hilarious they had. It was a pair of pants for a little girl, and it had Mickey and Disney on there, you know, so it's clearly a copyright violation. And they called it the Disney Bird Sanctuary was what it was supposed to be about. But you know, it's an excuse for you to buy some merchandise with Mickey and Miny on it.

And whoever put that stuff on there for them in English had a wicked sense of humor because underneath the Disney Bird Sanctuary it put they put a manifestation of ignorance and greed. And that's what this is. Uh. Microsoft and their racetrack articles are manifestation of ignorance and greed. Upon closer examination, the articles aren't just divisibly low quality, but they're also play drives. Take the about Hunter's death. It follows the exact same structure as a TMZ sports story

about his death. Here's the first line of TMZ's right up, they say former Boston Celtics and our Celtics. I guess it is. And that's the other thing too, You never know exactly had a kind of Americanized way to say it, or did you say it the way that the other people do in the native way? Anyway, the Boston team, the Orlando team player Brandon Hunter has died, Ohio men's basketball coach Jeff boll said Tuesday, he

was just forty two years old. Now, this is the way as it went through and made some crucial changes so that it didn't look like plagiarism. Former NBA participant, right, instead of player Brandon Hunter, who beforehand performed for the Boston Celtics and Orlando Magic has handed away again not passed away, but they had said died on the age of forty two, as introduced by Ohio Males basketball coach Jeff Bowls on Tuesday, instead of Ohio men's basketball coach

Males a basketball coach. And then here's the next two paragraphs the TMZ story. Hunter, a standout high school hoops player in Cincinnati, was a star forward for the Bobcats, earning three first team All MAC Conference or MC Conference selections and leading the NCAA and rebounding his senior year before being taken with a fifty sixth overall pick in the two thousand and three NBA draft. He played sixty seven games over two seasons in the association, scoring a career high seventeen

points against the Milwaukee Bucks in two thousand and four. But then when you run it through the autonomous cityocracy machine, it comes out Hunter initially a extremely regarded high school student, in other words, instead of a standout high school hoops players good ball participant in Cincinnati. So he was a standout high school hoops player in Cincinnati, achieved vital success as a ahead for the Bobcats.

They say was a star forward. I guess that's what ahead, right, They say Afford they translated as adad, and then they say he earned three first team All MC Convention alternatives, which they just copied directly, and then led the NC Double A in rebounding throughout his senior season. Hunter's expertise led to his choice because the fifty sixth general decide within the two thousand three NBA Draft, which means that before being taken as a fifty sixth overall pick.

Yeah, just it's when you think about this, think about intelligence involved here, and this is a perfect illustration of what people have been saying. It's just kind of like, you know, grabbing the stuff in and rehashing it, plagiarizing it and reorganizing it and then changing words that are synonyms, but within the has no sense of the overall context in which these words are used, so instead of a forward, I say and ahead. Instead of men,

I say males. Right, except it comes into total gibberish, they said everywhere else we looked on other racetrack articles on MSN clearly ripped off from other publishers. The pleasure tailor item is evidently mangled version of a blob by cold War cold Wire. Rather, a story about potholes in the UK is a butchered version of a piece and autocar, and a post about tennis star Novak Djokovic is lifted from Tennis World. So again that's one aspect of it.

But you know what neither the human nor the AI will talk about or investigate is why he died suddenly? Dude, that's the elephant in the room as well. And we can get distracted with this fake stuff out there, but they don't want to ask why he died suddenly? Why so many athletes are dying suddenly who don't realize that Trump's shot has damaged their heart like a major heart attack. And so we have artificial intelligence, So how's it going to be used? Well, the IRS says it's going to use it to

bust tax cheaters. Oh, isn't that a pleasant thought, as if the irs we're not insolent and enough and apathetic enough and coming up with nonsense over and over again to come the mind numbing the way they take your tax return and they essentially changed into something like artificial intelligence does in the first place. And now they're going to have of the AI do a deep dive on people's

tax returns, all these imagined in fractions that they're going to find. And that's a big part of it. You know, it's not just the army of people, eighty thousand new I R S agents, but it's also the fact that you know, Biden wanted eighty billion dollars, which is I think like something like seven times what the current what the current entire budget of the I R S is. This increase it with an amount that is seven times

what the current budget is, make it eight times bigger. The Republicans, being small government people themselves, I said, no, will only make it five times bigger, and patted them on themselves on the back for that. Well, given an increase that is five times bigger, so it'll be six times as big as it is instead of eight times. That's your difference between Democrats and Republicans. And so when this is looked at in this article by

Maggie Harrison, she's not concerned about this. She actually kind of is excited. Oh, these really super rich people are finally going to get their come up. It's right. She has no understanding of the way this whole thing is set up, and no understanding of the history of the income tax code. The income tax when it was first came out, it was about income. It wasn't about work, it wasn't about wages. It was about income. It was about investments only, and it was targeting the one percent of

the one percent only. And then at World War Two, they said, well, we're gonna put it, make it a temporary wage tax for the duration of the war. And at the end of the war they didn't take it away. Instead of what they did was they started putting out on their annual instruction sheet that they would mail to you, so thank you for voluntarily participating in this thing. If you don't voluntarily aticipate in it, they send the men with guns at you. Right, So the whole thing has been

and as we all know, they come after everybody at every level. And that's the way these government programs metastasized. But she doesn't think that's going to happen with this, No, not at all. You thought AI was only being used to eliminate the jobs of the working class. Will sounds like maybe it's going to be used against the wealthy for a change. There we go.

Yeah, that envy. They can always use envy to push their socialism in their Marxism and a Monday press release, the IRS announced that part of the renewed effort to ensure fairness and to crack down on the filthy rich cheaters. Right, and that's the headline that she has here. IRS says it's using AI to bust zillionaire tax cheats and the subtitle is honestly go off IRS and otherwords, go for it. Yeah, I want to see these rich

people squirm less. You're worried about the tech being aimed at the poor, he said. The release says this is what the IRS and the government says. You can trust this quote the groundbreaking collaboration among experts and data science and tax enforcement. We'll focus primarily on taxpayers with annual income of over a million dollars and more than two hundred fifty thousand dollars in tax debt in addition to

large corporate bodies. Well, isn't that nice. So instead of artificial intelligence, it goes out and plagiarizes articles that have been written by somebody else, traditional journalism that's gone out and repackaged government press releases and press releases from other people. I'm serious. I used to write the press releases for the Libertarian Party back in the early nineties and was involved with the campaigns of some of

the candidates, and we'd put the stuff out. If it was ever picked up by the press, they would pick it up and they would never call us. You know, we would make statements about what was happening. You know, this taxes has this history, and it's this big and it's equoted to that. You know, we'd make all kinds of statements like that, and they would never call us to question us about any of this stuff or

to verify any of the details that we were expecting they would. Instead, they would print it or they wouldn't, and if they did print it, they would just plagiarize it. And that's what she did with this IRS press release. She repackages that into an article and wraps her envy around it. It's what she did, the IRS will open examinations of quote, seventy five of the largest partnerships in the US unquote, and according to the IRS,

she says again, she's just quoting the IRS. She's it's no wonder that suits in the corporate office. It's like, we can get rid of these people. I can find ai that can regurgitate press releases from the government. If that's the way we're going to write stories right on average, cording to the IRS, these partnerships retain more than ten billion dollars in assets. Okay, So here's a question for her. You believe this, you believe the story that the IRS is giving you. So let me just ask you this.

If they're going to go after seventy five of the largest partnerships in the US, why do they need artificial intelligence? You know, why do they need so much computing power? Why do they need so many people? Well, here's the answer, lady, Because it isn't about the rich, you know, the the zillionaires, as you put it, it's about all of

us. This is going to be used against Americans. They need all of these people, and they need all this artificial intelligence because they've got a lot of tax returns to look at, and they've got a lot of money to steal. Another example the plagiarism of AI. The A V clubs AI generated articles are copying directly from IMDb. It was a site, the AV Club, and they said, it used to be a bench I've never noticed this before. It used to be a benchmark for pop culture writing on the net.

Now it is a private equity ghost town pumping out AI generated listicals instead of articles listicals. The company that bought it, Go Media. With the fallout, the Go editorial director Merril Brown sent out an internal memo instructing staff to ignore the criticism. Was this a memo that was sent to artificial intelligence? By the way, don't just ignore this criticism. Don't bring it back into some of your articles. To calibrate your expectations. They said, here's

a disclaimer that the company's articles by the AV Club bought. They even say quote this article is based on data from IMDb, the Internet Movie database. Quote text was compiled by an AI engine that was then reviewed and edited by the editorial staff. These stories were produced with the help of an AI engine. In other words, they admit that it was copied directly from IMDb, and it wasn't. I won't give you any examples of this, there's plenty

of them in this article. But the actuality is is that they didn't you begin with that information, they didn't add anything to it. They didn't even rewrite it in this particular case, like microsofted when they turned it into English, they just put it back out exactly as it was, which brings us to the alien mummies in Mexico. When I saw that, I thought it was hilarious. I said, look at this, it looks just like ET.

How could that be? You did Steven Spielberg know something even to the You know, ET had three very long fingers, if you remember, and a thumb. This one had a thumb and two very long fingers. I guess it was too difficult for them to make that third finger. But this is something that was a dog and pony show for the Mexican Congress. But I think it's a perfect metaphor for both the artificial intelligence and the UFO stuff

that is floating around now in the media. Really is I think, and these people who have been doing you know, they I don't know if this guy was purposely trolling. He's done this type of thing before. I don't know if he was purposely trolling the people in Washington, the UFO people in Washington, but if he wasn't doing it on purpose, he sure did a great job inadvertently. And they were very upset about this. And I said, oh, look, he's discrediting what we're doing here. No, he's

showing what you're doing here. You were just a little smarter. You didn't produce a model. He said, well, you know, I gotta tell you we found bodies, but I can't tell anything else about it now. He actually produced a little a little literally produced a couple of little bodies that looked like ET and came up with some stories about DNA testing and things like that. But he's been caught doing fraud before. But again, he was

allowed to do this with a Mexican Congress. And I am just imagining that Senator John Kennedy from LA just can't wait for this guy to come on to his committee. And because he's always doing stuff like this or Jim Jordan, you know, he's getting a lot of attention for this if he hasn't come on. These are non human beings, are not part of our terrestrial evolution. They had said. Former Navy US Navy fighter pilot Ryan Graves, who's been pushing the UFO stuff, said, this is a huge step backwards for

this issue. Yeah, they've done a great deal to try to make this look serious, even calling it UAP instead of UFO, because now it's very different. Right if you talk about UFOs, this type of thing we just saw with the Mexican Congress is typically what people want, so they got to rebrand it, relabel it, and this guy's stunt has set them back truly has Well, we're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back. You're listening to the David Night Show. But I want to continue a little

bit longer with a tech stuff. And by the way, in the third hour, we'll have a doctor Shiva I do who will be joining us, and he'll be doing a joint stream I think of the program when he joins

us. But again, going back to the new textiles that have been designed by the National intelligence, the intelligence community, the Director of National Intelligence, funded by ARPA, which is the intelligence equivalent to DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects, and of course there's another one about biology and that's BARDA. So you know, they've got. That's why I say, just as Eisenhower warned us about the military industrial complex, he also warned us about the research

and academic part of that. You know, people typically drop that off, but that was the other part of it, and how they were going to take over all research and weaponize it against us. And this article from Ldren's Health Defense actually goes into a little bit more detail showing some of the slides that they were putting out. I think it is interesting that their cover story is that it's about better health monitoring? Is that what the intelligence agencies are

really about that? I mean it's like, you know, looking at this Boston Dynamics thing, we look at it, you know what they're doing with that. But no, it's there to help little old ladies across the street, right because we just don't have enough boy scouts anymore. So this is not about better health monitoring. It's a ludicrous cover story. That's not their mission. And when you look at their slides and pull this up, Travis and show this slide they have, they talk about integrated audio, video and

jail location sensor systems. There's no biometric sensors in this. Instead, what you see with their thing, and this is almost, you know, like a satire smart epants. Perhaps it is a satire, except that they've said that they've had twenty two million dollars, they've awarded research contracts, and they've

got companies like Nautilus Defense and others. If it wasn't for all of this, and if it didn't, you know, the fact that it didn't come out of the Pentagon, I think they're pulling our legs, but actually they're monitoring our legs and everything else. And they do call it epants and smart self monitoring and reporting technology smartypants, But they say that it's sensing events and

they're specific about this. Again, I'm assuming that this is true. I mean, these people have done stranger stuff in the past sixty minutes of verbal conversation that it can record of a fifty five degree field of view, three hundred and sixty monochromatic photographs. In terms of looking, so it does listening, looking, and locating. It doesn't sound to me like it's about health, does. It sounds like it's something produced by the spat It can do.

It can also do optical character recognition o CR. Reading of twelve point text and said two minute monochromatic video and then determining location over the course of one hour without reliance on satellite navigation. SRI International, m I T A RETA have received undisclosed amounts to develop this technology. And this is from an article in the intercept, so multiple people have talked about this. It's official government release. It does sound like a satire, especially with the name Smarty

Pants, but it appears to be real. And what is fake is any cover story. Smarty Pants program director d Awesome Cagel trace the inspiration for the program to a desire for better health monitoring options for his diabetic Yeah, talking about how they're going to put the products into diapers. This is why Judge and Politano said, CIA wants to get into your pants and to diapers into

mask and I could definitely see that. You know, you want video, you want audio, and you want to trace people put it in the mask, even to the extent that other people are looking at. Of course, this kind of surveillance is something that is being done without people's consent, privacy and the age of big data and the Internet of things, and we're going to see a lot of this type of stuff because five G that Trump was so manic about getting out. If you remember that the only thing that we're

concerned about was not our health, not about surveillance. But it is the infrastructure for surveillance. And it's one of the reasons why the US government was so concerned about five G being based on top of Chinese technology and companies and chips. They want to be control of all the spying in this country, not the Chinese. So they're spending billions of dollars for this, and of course who knows how much they're spending because when you look at the Intelligence Agency

CIA, they've got a big black budget. They make lots and lots of money from selling drugs, from human trafficking, from blackmail and all the rest of this stuff. I mean, who knows how much money they really have and you're not going to see any of that. They don't report it on their IRS tax forms. I think we need to have an electronic Privacy Bill rights as the bottom line, regardless of what this is or when they're going to rule it out, according to John Whitehead, and he's exactly right.

He said, most judges don't understand this. Most are either so pro government or pro police that they're going to do anything to get around it and to say that it is constitutional, he said. Realistically, there is no way to escape it. So the only hope that we have, says John Whitehead, is if enough people will get vigilant for freedom and we can establish some

kind of electronic privacy bill of rights. It will limit what these people can do or have some real penalties because they don't pay any attention to the Constitution. But I think it's important if you had an electronic bill of rights, it would at least identify this for people what the issues are. But there's no interest at all in Congress. This is going to have to happen, as John Whitehead pointed out, from the bottom up, from the grassroots,

up from you and I up. He said, education precedes actions. So I'm telling people to get educated about what's going on and to understand this, and that is why we covered it. And as all of that is happening, Wall Street Journal says, well, it's now finally time to add some smart tech to your dumb home. Really yeah, you see, smart technology is for dumb people, not for dumb homes, but for people. Smart

lights, smart locks, smart thermostats are ready for primetime. Thanks to a new era is about that err o r of cooperation among tech giants and a new software standard they're cooperating. The new standard is called matter matter, the matter of the universe, the matter of their of their their artificial universe that they are creating. Well, you might want to think twice about that if

you look at what happened in Las Vegas this last week. Over a dozen MGM hotels and casino properties have halted their back end computer systems due to an ongoing and severe cyber attack that was initially reported on Sunday, But it's much much bigger than that. Nothing is working in these hotels. Guests are if they can check in, and people are still trying to check in. With all this chaos that's going on, You've got guests who are already there who

are locked out of their room because everything has been smartified. We've been smartified and everything under computer control. So when somebody hacks in and takes this system over, oh, they own everything. And so, as Wall Street journalist say, it, now is the time. Now go out and buy those smart appliances and all that, you know, the ring camera, so the government can constantly watch you and all the rest of this stuff. Now is

it time to get all that stuff. So every single subsystem with MGM hotels and casinos, every single substance system, their payments were offline. And I didn't realize just how many hotels are owned by MGM. I knew about the big green one that's there, and because we were there once. We used to go to Vegas for business conventions and stuff like that. Back when we had the videos stores. It was it was hardy. So we must be pretty low down on the list because the convention every year was in August.

Go to Vegas for an August but the heat. But computer systems at all MGM properties have been shut down for the immediate future until this issue is resolved. The gaming tables are not working, the slot machines are not working, the ATMs are not working, the doors are not working on the motel rooms, so restaurants are cash only. See when the system goes down, and

this is one of the reasons I'm talking about this. I don't really care about the casinos and Vegas and you probably don't either, but when the system goes down, and it will go down. I mean, when you look at this, it's going to be an act of war. Whether it's from the outside or whether it's an inside job. They are going to take down this the digital infrastructure that we have because you look at how dependent everybody is

on it. Right now, it's being done for ransomware by criminals, but once the state actors start getting involved in this, it's going to be really big. You don't necessarily even have to have an EMP to do that kind of damage, and if it's done by state actor, they're not interested in restoring anything if they get the money back. MGM's hotels where the Aria, the Cosmo, the Bellagio, the MGM and the Mandalay Bay, they have all of those and they are all shut down. At the MGM Grand eighty

percent of slot machines were down because of a network era. We can spell it there as er A instead of R R O R many reports of a ransomware attack. One person says, I wonder how long they can hold out before they pay. Commenting on this, another one says, it's chaos at MGM. Ordinary keys are opening all rooms as if they were master keys. The first they get locked out, then now the keys work and they work

on everybody's room. But look for the homeowner. The big threat is government and they maybe eventually robbers, you know, maybe somebody's really really wealthy. The robbers will work on their smart stuff to get in. But anyway, they still have long, long lines for people trying to check in, which is really amazing. No matter how many times you can see these types of

problems. And that's why it's so difficult to get people to care about surveillance and what the government is doing is because even when you see it breaking down, people still want to believe in this system. And so they want to believe in this so badly that they're still checking in to the Vegas hotels and they can't check him back this computer sit down where they think they're going to do when they get in. It's clear published reports have only scratched the surface.

Reported at ten point seven million people affected, and sources say that the data breach actually contained records of two hundred million people, financial records apparently of people who had bought stuff. They now have that. So that's the MGM hotels in Vegas. Toyota. Toyota production grinds to a halt due to an

epic IT failure or was it a hack? It's hard to tell. You know, they may have tried to cover this up because they don't want to make it look like their fair game and that they had to pay blackmail. But their story about how this happened doesn't really help them too much. Their story about what happened, if true, if it wasn't a hack, if it was what Toyota says happened with their supply lines, that's even more ridiculous,

even more incompetent. One of the world leading automakers recently had to suspend operations in twelve of its fourteen Japan based factories due to a massive IT failure, resulting in daily production loss of approximately thirteen thousand cars per day. So twelve out of fourteen shut down. So again, when we look at this, when are foreign hackers going to attack our infrastructure or when will it be

something like this? They said, this happened because of planned maintenance. They said, the company has confirmed that the root caused the problem was its database servers running out of storage space. Seriously, you didn't see that happening, and they said that because it was based on that. They said, we would like to reiterate that this system malfunction was not due to a cyber attack.

It was due to our overwhelming stupidity. The malfunction, they said, had a domino effect on the production ordering system, rendering it incapable of planning and executing any production tasks. Then what exacerbated the situation was that both the main and the backup servers operated on the same system. Oh okay, well then it's not a backup, is it. They're not infinitive each other, and they ran out of this space. Yeah, that doesn't really help,

does it. And then finally, when you take a look at where these people want to go, they want to hack not just our homes and our cars or factories or infrastructure, they want to hack our bodies. And that is the key thing. And so this is a c net article that there's a couple of months ago they were talking about bionic eyes and the subtitle of it was we could be able to manipulate our own reality, you know, so let's have some bionic eyes, and they talk about two different ways that

they would do it. Now, of course, neuralink is looking at this and saying, well, if we can hack into your brain, then what we can do is we can put give you some visor that you wear, and then that can transmit this information to your brain. But then, of course that means the Neuralink's approach to get into your brain, they actually have to open up your head, your skull and put this chip literally on top

of your brain. These people have a different approach. Instead of opening up your brain, they want to open up your eye and put a chip in your eye. And so they call this the science eye. They said, it'll be implanted on top of your eye, or inside and or inside the eyeballs of human patients who are suffering from diseases. One of the reasons that they talked about this liked it so much, was because it involves a couple

of different things. It involves this neuralink type of technology and electronics along with some genetic modification of you. Isn't that great? Isn't technology wonderful? As I said, they shot off a brief demo to these reporters of a kind of vision that someone with science I might have, and it was just kind of red pixels dancing around a screen, a view of a street and of

humans waving their hands. And they said, so to make sense of this, we first need to deliver a gene to a specific region of the eye and demonstrate that it can generate electrical signals and regions of the brain responsible for controlling sight. And then to explain their idea of the eye, the writers of this scenet articles say, your eye and your brain are involved in a frantic dance enlivened by a storm of light and electrical signals. Isn't that nice?

It's some science for arts and lovers, you know, poets, very poetic. This dance has been honed by millions of years of evolution. What absolute nonsense, I mean, how can you look at something so detailed as the human brain and the human eye? Even Darwin with his crude primitive understanding and his crude primitive tools. You know, remember when we went to the British Museum, Travis, and we went to the Darwin exhibit, and they had a shrine, a little shrine to Darwin. And he didn't even have

a good microscope. He had like a you know, Sherlock Holmes magnifying glass that he's looking at stuff with. It's like, no wonder. He thought that life was spontaneously generating out of ponts, out of stagnant water. All he had was this little microscope. He had very primitive tools, and he had a very primitive understanding. But even Darwin referred to the eye and he said that that's complicated enough without really understanding all the inner workings of the eye

like we do today. He said, that is so complicated, hard for that to evolve. He thought that was a real problem with this theory of evolution. But these people have swallowed a whole They don't think it's a problem at all. And so, you know, they talk about the fact they have these different cells which are shaped like rods and cones. They contain molecules known as opsins, and this is something it took me for a very long time to understand. I had a seventh grade science teacher, and you know,

they she was how do I describe I won't go into that. It's but she was very, very proud of what she did, and she taught an advanced science class. And I got put into that because when I was in elementarys. At elementary school, I was all about science. I was

trying to get everything i could. I'm right off to the Oak Ridge Nuclear Labs and everything out, all these different things, getting my sisters science books, from college and stuff and reading through them, and my teachers in fifth and sixth grade thought that was something they should put me in the advanced science class. And she got me completely out of science. She turned me off

at science completely. And one of the first things that happened, and it was a real surprising thing, she said, you know so, And she was coming at this as an ardent evolutionist, so we kept hitting heads with it because I was an ardent creationist. And it took me a while to really understand why she said what she did. She asked people, She said, so, why do nocturnal animals see better at night than they do in

the day, or see so well at night? And I knew because I had read my sister's textbooks about you know, what is in the eye, the rods and the cones, and how our eyes are different from animals, especially nocturnal animals. And I said, well, they have more rods than they do cones, and and she said, what what are you talking about? You know, and just did her best to try to humiliate me in

front of the class. Her answer, which I couldn't even understand the circular logic of it, Her answer was they see better at night because they come out at night. That was her evolutionary mindset. You see, the fact that they wanted to go out at night meant that they generated eyes that could see at night. Wow. Yeah, After first I thought it was the

dumbest answer I could ever see. And then as I got older, I started to understand where she was coming from, and it got even dumber, you know, because you if you understand the details of this, you see the creator again. Like I said, even Darwin said it was a black box. He didn't know anything about rods and cones. Now we have a situation. The cones allow you to see things in greater detail, and they allow you to see color. The rods are typically not focused on color,

they're not focused on detail, but they do movement better. And so we have and they talk about this because they're using in their experiments, they're using eyes from rabbits. And they said, well, in the rabbit's eyes, the cones that they have or in a few strips here and there, whereas for our eyes, the cones are in a pit that is directly behind the center of the eye. So when you look directly on something, you're going to see it in detail. You know, we pick up movement from the

side because we have cones on the side. And it's one of the reasons why when you are, you know, out and it's low light conditions, you don't want to try to look directly at whatever it is. You want to look off to the side a little bit and you can see it a little bit better. Anyway, Yeah, because she was an eolutionist, it was determined by what you know. They could see better at night because they

wanted to see better at night. They could see better at night because they went out at night, and because they went out at night, somehow their eyes just changed like that, completely dismissing the detail of it, the amazing detail of it. Look, the best scientists, Christian scientists, people like Francis Bacon, people like Isaac Newton, people like John Clerk Maxwell, they saw themselves, as they saw science, as discovering what God had done,

the great engineer, the great designer, the great scientist. They were looking for the intelligence in it. And in one of the reasons that we have evolved as a society is because we don't want to see that intelligence, and so we become fools and genetic diseases. They said abnormalities and the photoreceptor in the retina lead to their death. And so what they're trying to do is too they said, but you know, you still have the processing ability of

the brain. Of course, you know the brain just happened as well as you know, we don't really understand how that happened. And so again trying to genetically manipulate and get some of these signals there, using electronics to somehow feed this end of the brain. And that's what they're doing. Different approaches to it, depending on whether you are taking the Elon Musk approach or the approach that these people are doing. The vision restoration for early patients will not

be a miraculous return to twenty twenty. Twenty twenty vision not the year twenty twenty. Don't want to go back there again. If we're going to set the way Back machine or the or the Deloian, we don't want to go back to twenty twenty. But it will help them make sense of their world. The sensation will be a kin to site with much less fidelity in order

to get a higher solution image. Human retina contains more than one hundred million photoreceptors in each eye, but this will only have maybe about a million, so one one hundredth of what it has there isn't that interesting? You know? The amazing design and construction of our eyes, of our brains. You know, when they try to mimic the human brain, they talk about the

computing capacity. How can it operate so fast? How can it have so much capacity, so much density and not generate a lot of heat and all the rest, which is going to be a big issue. I think with that chip setting directly on your brain, I won't be signing up for that. I don't know who's going to sign up for that. Anyway, they continue to just look the other way, just like they look the other way with DNA, and they go in and start messing with it. Yeah,

they discover this thing and then jump in. And a number of companies are experimenting with different techniques besides Neural Incol, besides this company. So that's all we have to look forward to. But the key thing is that, as this article points out, and seeing that instead of restoring vision, perhaps imagine a science eye that is implanted in a person who has perfect vision, and it might stimulate the brain in such a way the person sees specific images or

places that really are not there. It is an idea exemplified by the posters that line the hallways of Science Core, artwork jokingly referred to as propaganda. They said they have an abstract piece, so one of them caught my eye. It's an abstract piece featuring a series of colored nodes in the shape of brain, and underneath it it reads alter the brain, alter the reality.

You see, this is fundamentally about transhumanism and about virtual reality. The guy at Science Core who gave his p presentation signed off with see you in the matrix. So what they're pushing us into his transhumanism virtual reality? And as you look at this article from Technocracy News scientists re engineer the brain to alter human addiction and his comment on this article that he published there, He published it with a comment re engineering the brain to try to alter human behavior has

begun to emerge as a new frontier in medicine, they said. And then his comment is, beware this knife cuts in both directions. You know, all technology does. All technology can be used for good or evil. It depends on who wields it, who controls it, who develops it. And guess who wields controls and develops technology. Now the military industrial academic complex that

Eisenhower talked about, and that's what we should be concerned about. As they go through this particular one, they say, well, you know, when you things that you get addicted to, and it can be a lot of different things, you know, of course, you know, sex, drinking, drugs, gambling, pornography. So they all flood the brain with surges of dopamine, and so people like the way that that makes them feel, so they do that behavior again. But then what happens is the brain starts

to produce less and less dopamine each time. So that's why you keep pushing things on and on. It's what Oliver Anthony was trying to explain, and Joe Rogan kept shutting him down, you know, about pornography, about alcohol, about all add of all these. Joe Rogan foolishly saying, well, it happens to some people, that happened to me. Of course, you know, I can handle this stuff. I can handle you know, sex,

drugs and rock and roll and all. You know, I don't have a problem with any of that stuff, and you know some people do. But you know, if you're listening to me, you can probably handle it as well, Oliver, and he said, no, you know, it just it it gets you, and then you're looking for something else that's bigger, you know, whether you're looking for harder drugs or you're looking for harder pornography or something like that. It's an iterative thing. And so their observation

the scientists said, well, here's a mechanism that we see there. You know, Parkinson's disease dopamine, which is used not just to produce pleasure, but you know, it's a it can be used to help the body function. And so they had identified a gene that produces a protein that encourages dopamine production. So this guy said, I wonder if, because dopamine is there

with this addiction stuff, if I could use that same approach. And we've got some animals, some monkeys and stuff like that that we've gotten addicted to alcohol, evidently sent around listening to the Joe Rogan podcast or something, and so they're addicted to alcohol. So they gave them this genetic modelification. Their body produced more dopamine and that stopped their addiction. So what do we have

to be careful about with this? Well, obviously the government or people who want to control you, Someway or the other corporations, government, you name it. They could basically use this dopamine as some kind of a Pavlovian response. Right. You know, we can turn off the dopamine for you, or we can turn it back on you. Just do what we say.

That type of thing, that's a really dangerous, dangerous thing. And so as we look at technology, and remember we began with the artificial intelligence writing actually not writing, but just copying and making stupid substitutions, plagiarizing with stupid substitutions, an obituary. Now we have senators who are calling for government to hand out licenses to artificial companies because you know, we've got to control this stuff. We've got to make sure it's not harmful, especially in elections,

and so we will hand out licenses for this. And you know how this is going to turn out. It's going to turn out the same way as big pharmaceutical companies and big agricultural, big Agra, big pharma. It will

be regulatory capture, and they will also capture our elections. Right. They want to create a new government agency, and this is coming from Josh Holly and a bunch of Democrats, and it's Josh Holly and the Democrat leaning Susan Collins in Maine, along with Chris Coon's, Amy Klobuchar, Richard Blumenthal. And so these people want to create a new government agency to control artificial intelligence and to license it. The newly minted legislation that has been called Protect Protect

Elections from Deceptive AI Act. And so the question is, when you create this new bureaucracy, what's going to keep these solons who are set there at the guardians of truth and elections? What's going to keep them from manipulating elections? Who watches the watchers? The agual question. You give these people this kind of control over artificial intelligence, and the corporations become the deputized state for election control and propaganda and the rest of this stuff. We know that's what's

going to happen. They say that the legislation maintains safeguards for satire, parody and news broadcasts. Oh really, it'll be shut It'll be used to shut down any news, any opinions, and it will push out its own propaganda. We know exactly what is going to happen with this. They will require government licensing for firms that develop artificial technologies, and they will be regulated quote

unquote, just like the FDA regulates Fizer MODERNA. That's the really scary thing about this, one last thing, rise of the robo umps, robotic umpires. This is something's happening in minor league baseball. They don't want to talk about it, but some people have noticed what is happening. And I think it's an interesting metaphor for what the government wants to do with artificial intelligence,

because they do want to make artificial intelligence the umpires for everything. AI will be the umpire for your speech, AI will be the umpire for your conduct. AI will be the umpire for a religion and for politics. Is that a Minor League Baseball's Triple A level. An experiment took place this year that Major League Baseball apparently doesn't want reporters writing about. And the key question is

why not Major League Baseball has tested an automated ball strike calling system. Yeah, the AI is going to call the balls and strikes in this game, but they want the AI to call the balls and strikes and everything. So I said, this season at all thirty ballparks and Triple A Minor league baseball's highest level in most weeks. During the season, fifteen of those ballparks hosted

six game series. In the first three games, the ABS, the automated Ball Strike system, supposedly determined balls and strikes, with the home plate umpire receiving the Hawkeye tracking system's rulings via a tiny earpiece and relaying them to everyone in the stadium via traditional hand signals. The whole idea of ABS, they said, is that a fan would not even notice that it was being used. Do you understand this is how they maintained the pretense of human control.

That would just have this human down there with feeding him the stuff in his ear, the same way they've been running the news media too, right, I think a broadcast news Holly Hunter and I can't remember the actor's name, a great film. It really enjoyed that before I got into the business. I thought it was a great film. It kind of even better after I got into the business. But you know, somebody feeding them information instead of them. You know, it's not enough that they got a teleprompter, but

they're also feeding them information. Look, that's it, and it's going to be the pretense. They'll have a pretense of human control. Just as we began this and said, you know they've got we got human editors who are looking at this stuff. No, you don't. No, this is obvious that the AI is just copying it and making really stupid substitutions to make it look like it's not just pure plagiarism. So that is what we have to look forward too. Well, when we come back, we're going to talk

about immigration and id we'll be right back making sense common again. You're listening to the David Night Show. We just saw this comment on Rock Fan from Audie m R r R and Modern Retro Radio. Thank you very much that it was very generous. He left to tip thank you. I appreciate that

he had a comment about what is happening in New Mexico. So I'm gonna switch over before we go to immigration and ID S, I'm gonna switch over to Second Amendment update and his comment the silver lining and New Mexico governors tyrannical overreach is that she inadvertently woke up her whole state, if not the whole nation. People are finally starting to remind politicians who they work for. Yes, absolutely, and that's an Audie with Modern retro Radio, Thank you very

much. I appreciate that. Also on rock Fan, thank you for the tip, truck driver Ron, I appreciate that, thank you. And on Rumble, thank you for the tip. Damnage says, if I got hit with a ransomware attack, I tell the ransomer to just keep the information because I'm broke. They'd take one look at my bank information, it'd feel bad for me and just grant my access back. Yeah. Yeah, what we

have to be concerned about is our own government. I think that's the thing that we need to be concerned about, and we'll talk about that as a matter of fact in this Second Amendment thing here. But again, mack down, this is a aw R. Hawkins, who writes on Brybart smacked down. Temporary restraining order has now been issued against the new Mexico governor's concealed carry

ban. She's getting slapped back by everybody again. You know, the Democrat mayor, the Democrat district attorney there where she tried to impose these things and say, well, we're not going to honor even your concealed carry permits, not gonna let it happen, just arbitrarily, and the absurd idea that's going to be based on protecting public health. No. Hey, if I can say that this is about help, I can do whatever I want to.

The police chief there appointed by the Democrat mayor. So the mayor said no, district attorney said no, the police chief appointed by the mayor, and so forth this, you know, working for the mayor said no. The sheriff who's elected there and who has also gotten money from every town, a big gun control thing run by Bloomberg. Even he said no, even David Hogg said no. And now the courts have said no. It's gonna blow back big time. And this is what I think is even more important.

You know, I talked to a guy, Ralphord Jesse has the program Gun Guy, And I think what's even more important is that by standing up for our rights in one area, we start to stand out for our rights and other areas. People are sick and tired of this public health emergency order.

They need to be worried about the other MacGuffins, like the climate, the other things like that, but you know, they've seen through this and they're sick of this public Health Executive Order stuff and how broadly it's been used. And so gun Owners of America one of two organizations you had a national association

for gun rights than Gun Owners of America. Gun Owners of America has secured a temporary restraining order with their lawsuit the judge right now, the temporary restraining order is an oral order, so there's no written decision from the judges. Just no, you can't do that. She's not going to win. And just let me show you this because as I've said from the very beginning, I said, you know, she's I think, got a bit of a

Napoleon complex. A lot of these women, do you know, there's something we talk about somebody who's extremely short, like Napoleon, and they want to show people whose boss right, so they get really authoritarian. And I've seen this a lot with these women, especially Democrat women. They democrats have an authoritarian bent to begin with, but especially the women, and especially a woman

who has as short as she is. I kind of thought that I had heard somewhere that she was pretty short, and it turns out she's only four foot ten. Here she is standing next to a police officer who is seven feet tall. Now, first of all, public health emergency. They're both wearing masks, so you know, this has taken some time in the last three years recently. But the police officer there is seven feet tall and she's four foot ten, so she comes up to about his elbow. Maybe we

need to exile her to Elba with the Napoleon. So we've had The Ninth Circuit Court has now rebuked lawmakers there in California and granted an injunction against a

California law that wanted to target gun marketing. Gun marketing and what they said was a California law ostensibly aimed at restricting the marketing of firearms to miners infringes on the free speech rights of adults, according to a three judge panel on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge Kennethley ruled that a law forbidding the marketing and advertising of firearms that quote reasonably appear to be attractive to miners unque

is likely to infringe on the First Amendment, given that the statute is so broadly written that advertisements aimed at adults who can lawfully purchase a farm would be swept up in its provisions. So, in other words, they were trying to kill the First Amendment so they could kill the second Amendment so they could kill the people who manufacture the weapons. I should say, right, and

he saw through it. He said this. He said, there is no evidence in the record that a miner in California has ever unlawfully bought a gun, let alone because of an ad. Kid goes in, we should do that. You should have just like Christmas story. If Ralphie go in, yeah, I'm like liked to buy a Red Rider rifle, the real thing. You know, Sure, kid, what do you want? I think

the alphas would kick him out the door. Norah, has the state produced any evidence that truthful ads about lawful uses of guns, like an ad about hunting rifles and junior sports magazines your shooters. They haven't offered any evidence that that encourages illegal or violent gun use among miners. Simply put, California cannot lean on gossamers of speculation to weave an evidence free narrative that it's law curbing

the First Amendment. Quote significantly une demands more than good intentions, I'm sorry, significantly decreases unlawful gun use among miners. The First Amendment demands more than good intentions and wishful thinking to warrant the government's muzzling of speech. So far, so good from this decision, but listen to what else he had to

say. He said, the state has many tools at its disposal to address juvenile crime involving guns, but it quote cannot ban truthful ads about lawful firearm use among adults and miners unless unless here's that caveat, unless it can show that such an intrusion in the First Amendment will significantly further the state's interest in

curtailing unlawful and violent use of firearms by miners. So if they produce lies by somebody like Faucci, for example, you know, you get the firearm equivalent of Fauci, and you produce a bunch of slick lies, and you've got a guy who's really slick. Every time you call him out on it, you know, he pivots and he says, well, you know, I wasn't talking about public health and group health. That was talking about individual health. And you know that type of thing like we just saw him.

Do you got somebody who's really good in terms of lying. If you can show that it's going to work with somebody like Faucci, well then you can destroy people's natural god given rights, because he puts that unless unless you can show that an intrusion into the First Amendment will significantly there are the state's interest and curtailing unlawful violent use of arms by miners. Now here's what the state

was created to do. According to our founding documents, Constitution, decorational independence. These people swore to uphold. The state was created first and foremost not to keep us safe, but to keep our God given rights safe, to protect our individual liberty. It's a big problem. Now, I said, you know, we'll get to how they're going to some of the danger in

terms of labeling people. Here's a very dangerous thing. A New Jersey city is going to expand their controversial gunshot detection system where they one million dollar grant. Oh yeah, that's how it all comes right, yea, just like we had the public health emergency and Trump was granting everybody money for this and that. You know, well, here's what FACCI says, and here's the money to do it. FACI says this, here's the money to do it,

right, Simon says, and Trump pays for it. Well, so the federal government gives them a million dollars grant in Newark, New Jersey City Council as approved expanding the city's shot Spotter system. Critics question the value of the detection system like that, They said it occasionally mistakes car backfires or other booms for gunshots, saying they can lead to over policing of neighborhoods. Well, the real issue is that it's kind of like swatting, isn't it.

You know, we're people for a prank. They call up and say, hey, you know there's a crime going on here, and you know, they describe the crime in a way they're going to get the swat team called on that location, and so the police show up with the swat team. People have been killed on both sides of this thing. It's a very dangerous

thing to flag something that is a serious crime that is happening. And as they say, the critics say, when spot shot Spotter generates a false alert, police are deployed to an area and may treat everyone like there as a suspect shooter, even when no shooting has even taken place, And that's the real issue now. In response, the company says, these things are ninety seven percent accurate. But I've seen that. You know, when you look

at speech transcription programs. Ninety seven percent accuracy is garbage. You better be better than ninety seven percent accurate. Yeah, it's so, you know, if you look at things like let's just go back to the Boeing seven thirty seven max. Right, it was nine nine point nine percent accurate in terms of not crashing. They had eight two hundred flights and only two of them crash, But you had in each of those two hundred and fifty people lost

their life. But hey, it's rare, you know, and its accuracy rate is actually pretty high in terms of not failing. You know, it's

non failure rate. And so when you're talking about something like this that could get people shot because if they hear that there's gunshots going on, and this is something that is done automated, and they give it to humans who review this, you know, just like you got human editors and human umpires who are second guessing the AI on all these different things, and you know, they look at this and they say, well, yeah, it looks like that's for real. So these guys go out, locked and loaded, ready

to shoot. They see some kid playing and we you know, this is not a theory. This has already happened even without it being called in as a shot by some shot spotter. You please pull up and there's a kid playing with a toy gun, and they jump out of the car and execute him because somebody called it in. Do you think they're gonna do if somebody called in with a shot spotter and kids just walking around. He's got a

stick and he's gonna pew pew pew. Right, And so then that brings us when we're talking about firearms, brings us to hunter Biden indicted on federal firearms charge. Isn't that interesting? They went full kin star on this. I've talked about this for a long time. You kin star. Oh, this guy is so conservative, you know this, this strong Christian prosecutor that's

out there. We're going to get him on that sleazy Bill Clinton. He's got all these allegations, credible allegations from many, many women about violent sexual assault and rape. He's got very very credible allegations about financial crimes and corruption. And then there's this consensual affair that he's got with Monica Lewinsky and and that's not a crime, but they found that he committed perjury when he was

talking about that so we'll go after him for perjury. We'll forget all the rapes and violence, sexual assault, We'll forget massive corruption and criminal actions done by the Clintons. No, Ken Star said, I'm going to take a look at that perjury that he committed lying under oath. Same thing is happening

here. The Biden administration needs to be seen to be doing something, and so you know, they by coming after him with these gun charges, they can stay away from any of these this financial corruption that would implicate the big guy. The big guy and that level of corruption. So this is actually the safe thing for them to do. I remember this is a federal charge,

so his papa could could excuse him for any of this stuff. Maybe he won't because I think one aspect of this may be one of the advantages for Biden is that mister gun control Joe Biden could be seen by the Democrats. Yeah, I'm you know, we got a control gun so much, I'm even going to control it. When my son illegally buys a gun and lies on his form, that's what we're talking about. It's very very similar

to Bill Clinton. You know, Bill Clinton committed perjury about something that was consensual and so Hunter Biden committed perjury on his form there, it's gun form. Hunter Biden knowingly made a false statement certifying that he was not an unlawful user of or addicted to any stimulant, narcotic or drug something. He's pretty much an awful, unlawful user and addicted to all may that's the you've said any if at all, you know, yes, uh I am, I'm

addicted to all of these things. And when you look at the overarching hypocrisy of all this, the big guy, Joe Biden is the daddy of some of the most harsh criminal aspects of the drug war, civil asset forfeiture and the rest of this type of mandatory minimums things like that that came after end users. So Biden has destroyed our legal system, corrupted the police, and imprisoned a lot of people by going after the end user, which is something

they never did during alcohol prohibition. You know, they went after the people who were making it, selling it, not the end users really, and so they changed that a rent And that was Joe Biden who did that, and he's proud of it. Joe Biden, who's been there always on gun control and pushing it everywhere. And so here's a guy, his son who is who violates the gun laws, who violates the drug laws that his father

has put in there. He flaunts both of these things. He does it for years, and only as they are beginning an impeachment process do they get serious about indicting him. But the millions and unpaid taxes, Oh, I'm not going to pay attention that, even as Biden is, you know, exploding the size of the IRS. They don't care about the millions and unpaid taxes by Hunter by Biden, about the corrupt foreign involvement and the bribery and

the corruption with foreign governments. They don't care about any of that stuff. No, they're going to weaponize the IRS, just like they weaponize the war on drugs, just like they weaponized their war on the Second Amendment. And he is going to continue to accelerate and explode the IRS as they get a complete pass on all this stuff. I mean, that is the that crime is as obvious as the way he purchased this firearm. It's just a fact.

Where did this money come from? And you didn't pay taxes on this. This is why you have so many rest whistle blowers have come out. Yeah, don't you know, make tens of millions of dollars and you don't pay any taxes on it. That's an objective fact. And they're every bit as much as this form that he lied on. But they're going to give that a pass. Well, we're gonna take a quick break and when we come back, we will take a look at immigration and I d we'll be

right back. The seed that our whole boys there that go, we're all can see feed it with our devotion. Boys call it the liberty tree fits at tall old tree and the strong old tree. And we are the sons just be are the sons, the sons of liberty, liberty, it's your move. You're listening to the David Night Show. Well, we have a

judge that has ruled the DOCCA program created by Obama is illegal. Who knew when you have an executive order that actually came from his his Attorney General, Janta Paulitana, When you have an order coming from the executive branch saying we're not going to enforce the law, who knew that that would be illegal? These people took an oath as a part of their as a condition of their being in office. They took an oath to defend and protect the Constitution but

also to enforce the laws. And then they come out and say, well, I've decided I'm not going to enforce the law. But the interesting thing about this is how this hot potato keeps getting passed around from politicians to courts, to politicians to courts. Nobody wants to do anything about data. A ruling from a federal court has concluded that Obama's program to protect the illegal aliens, the Deferred Action for childhood arrivals, is illegal. They never took action,

they don't plan on taking any action. These are you know, you can come into the country. Now, this isn't the next step. And of course, you know, we had the anchor baby thing. If people who are not citizens of the United States, if they come in and they're not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, the legal fiction that if they have a child here, because that's the ways defined in the fourteenth Amendment, you know. But they were very clear about that because they want to

give citizenship to the newly freed slaves. They said, if you were subject to the jurisdiction, But then they also pointed out that if you're here legally as a representative of a foreign country or something like that. Your children don't become American citizens because they're born here while you are here legally. These are people who are here illegally and their citizen and their children should not become citizens

either. But then they extended it. They said, okay, so if you come over here illegally before the age not just being born here, but you know, you come here before the age of whatever, and I don't remember what the age was, seventeen maybe or something like that, then you can stay. That was what Obama said. We're not going to enforce the immigration laws against anybody who comes here illegally below a certain age as a child. And then they added that they got away with that that all right,

it's worked for babies that are born here. It's worked for kids who come here, you know, up to just under high school age. So now let's try the adults. And when they did that, finally the Republicans pushed back and then, oh, you know, when you have Obama's rule there, Trump campaigns against that, against Dhaka and against the open borders and all the rest of stuff. But when Trump becomes president, what does he do nothing nothing. It doesn't say, well, that was Obama's executive order.

Now here's my executive order, countermanding that didn't do it. Just pretended that that was now the new law of the land, you know, like a Supreme Court decision about when you can kill a baby. So he just pretended that was a new law of the land, and so that he wouldn't have to actually take any responsibility for it. He sent it to the courts, and the courts said, yeah, you can't do anything about that. We'll see, folks. I tried, but I can't do anything, he said,

Trump and so pretend he couldn't do anything about it. So now you got a judge who says, well, it's not it's not legal, of course, because the Department of Justice has come out flagrantly saying they're not going to obey the law. But now this judge says, but I'm not going to do anything to deport anybody. That's the hot potato. That's why they

keep passing this thing back and forth. And this is how we wound up with having judicial supremacy, with a regulation without representation, a bureaucracy that rules. Supreme Congress doesn't want to take the heat for doing certain things, so they kick it over to the bureaucracy. If the bureaucracy gets it wrong, then they come in like their heroes and say, no, we'll fix that, we'll fix that, but they don't want to take the heat for it.

And of course the other aspect of it is is that by creating these bureaucracies they can grow the government so quickly. They couldn't grow the government that quickly if you actually had to go through a parliamentary process with your elected representatives. By the way, that's why, that's why the founders said laws will be passed by legislature and we'll have these rules and so forth, because you don't want somebody just going out and writing up rules over and over again.

And you know, all they do is post it and they take comments and it doesn't matter if most of the comments don't like their rules. They go through a commenting period and that's it. Now we're going to do what we want because we're the experts. And so we have taxation without representation, we have regulation without representation because nobody wants to take responsibility for it, just like this judge. He says, Docca is clearly illegal, but I'm not going

to do anything about it. Same judge ruled in twenty twenty one that the program could continue, but at that time banned new applicants from joining. And so you found that the Biden administration's scheme to codify the program through the writing

of new regulations that is illegal, he said. But this is now expected to go to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the appeals judge said at that point in time last year, he said, DACA creates a new class of otherwise removable aliens who may obtain lawful presence, work authorization and associated benefits. And he said Congress determined which aliens can receive those benefits, and it

did not include DACA recipients among them. And so this is something that goes back eleven years twenty twelve and then Trump, according to this article from W and D, Trump tried to take it down starting in twenty seventeen. Ha ha, just another example of people who will push this Trump fakery. Nothin but fakery. Well, I can't do anything about it. I tried. The deep state is just so difficult to deal with, you know, just

but you like me again, I'll fix it. Next time. Then even more dangerous and crazy is this idea about the border where you have I Patch McCain, Dan Crenshaw and several Republican candidates who want to invade Mexico. Maybe that's the only way we'll get our border protected, right, we just stop these wars in Afghanistan and rock Trump like you said you're gonna do, bring the troops home. Just set them on the border. You don't have to attack anybody anything, just be there. It's like, no, it can't

come across, you know that type of thing. We'll guard everybody's borders but our own. But maybe if we start a war with Mexico, maybe then we'll guard our borders. Who knows. The hawkish wing of the Republican Party isn't backing down on its hopes of involving you know, the US and a new long term foreign military conflict rights the New American heightened emotion surrounding the two of the hottest button issues, immigration and drug crisis some in the GOPC and

opening for directing the electric's desire for action into a military foray. And of course that would include candidates like DeSantis and Ramaswami and a bunch of others. Crenshaw is chairman of the House Task Force to Combat Mexican Drug Cartels, and he is trying to make this a bipartisan port for his new war the ipatch McCain. The immediate reaction from Democrats has been you can't just go invading Mexico, he said, And it's like, stop being an ignoramist. That's not

what anybody is talking about, said Crenshaw. I envisioned the same kind of military intervention we use all over the world. Isn't that what we do all over the world? In didn't we just go in and invade these places, you know, like Syria? Were we invited into Syria? Are we working with the government of Syria? No? Where it's entirely led by the host nation. You know, that's the kind of military intervention we use all over the world is entirely led by the host nation. Did you realize that?

Did you realize that our intervention in Afghanistan was entirely led by the host nation? They have an Afghan government that you know, they install it says, yeah, we're running this thing. It's kind of like the human umpire with

the robot calling the balls and strikes or the same thing in Iraq. You know, look, we got an Iraqi government that we put in here after we invaded, after we get the government out, or Syria, and so in the mind of Crenshaw says, the new American US involvement in Mexico would be similar to the operations that have been conducted in Colombia that the American troops going on joint missions. It also wants the US to provide Mexico with close

air support if they're operating an ice DID regions. But despite assurances and overtures to the Democrats, Crenshaw would not take unilateral American military action, something that several other well known Republicans have already been pushing for. And he says,

I'm not going to take that off the table. And you have this, as Politico points out, the New American quote sentence said, We've had a lot of senators and presidential candidates who said we want to take unilateral measures here and whether or not the Mexican government likes it, yeah, We're gonna come in there for their own good and for our own good. And Crenshaw said,

yeah, and I'm not going to take that off the table. So We got to Santis who says he's open to using drone strikes against Mexican drug cartels. We got Senator Tom Cotton, who was proposed sending in Special Operation Forces, and he said, if Mexico doesn't want to help, quote, so be it. Unquote. We don't care whether or without them. Vivek Ramaswamy envisions launching a quote shock and awe military campaign against drug cartels. Asa

Hutchinson pushing for the deployment of American forces south of the border. Lindsey Graham, of course, Lindsey Graham. I never saw a war that he didn't want to send people to or start. Lindsey Graham and John Kennedy Louisiana, who just got all of his attention for reading pornography books in the Senate and that type of thing. How many times do they have to be done right before we do anything about it? At this point, that's just grandstanding for

attention really to read that. But anyway, John Kennedy, he pulls stunts like that. You know, when they had their their UFO hearings, then y'all better lock your doors. I can't tell you what we said inside, but I just tell you this you better lock your doors anyway, He introduced, along with Lindsay Graham, a bill to declare nine cartels as foreign terrorist

organizations and to authorize the use of military force against them. And of course, you know this authorization for the use of military force they passed in the wake of the inside job of nine eleven. That's been used for no least seven wars that we know of, and who knows how many secret wars that we don't know, the unknown unknown wars of Rumsfeld. The cartels are at war with US, poisoning more than eighty thousand Americans with fentnyl every year,

said Crenshaw. What about those poppy fields in Afghanistan? Crenshaw, what about that? Should we be concerned about the fact that when the American government went into Afghanistan that drug production there exploded and you had the entire time we were there, record crops of opioids coming out of Afghanistan and always more than ninety percent of the world's supply coming out of that one country while we were there,

not before and not after they took it down. Should we be concerned about the use of crack cocaine that the military and intelligence agencies inflicted on Americans because they needed some money for their secret wars. You want to talk to me about fentonyl You want to talk to me about any of this stuff, your corrupt war on drugs. This is not the way to handle these addiction things. Again, I've had people on retired law enforcement, retired judges and

prosecutors and everything that were part of this. They didn't want to talk about it until they retire, because it's just like this stuff with the corruption our medical profession. When you talk about it, you'll get retired one way or the other. So they wait until they retire in their own turns, and then they talk about it. But they all know that this is a it's a spiritual issue, it's a medical issue. It is not a law enforcement

issue. And they've been proven that that's right, because for over fifty years now we have failed. Was it fifty two years I think it was in nineteen seventy one that the war on drugs began. I think it's been fifty two years now of failure. And what it is produced are things like fentyl. You get more and more concentrated forms of whatever it is that you're trying to prohibit it's produced things like fentanyl, has produce things like crack cocaine,

and of course so has our criminal government. And so when Dan Crenshaw wants to address what happened with the poppy fields in Afghanistan, then we can talk about going into Mexico. My concern would be that this government going into Mexico might have the same kind of results as they did in Afghanistan. Of course, you know, start manufacturing it on a much bigger scale than it is now. Whatever synthetic drugs are making in Mexico. Yeah, let's talk about

the military's war of drugs on Americans. Let's talk about the intelligence communities war of drugs on Americans. Oh no, the Mexicans are the problem. The Mexicans are just trying to make money out of this war on drugs that we've done. It's just part of I'm not excusing anything they do. I'm just saying that you're always going to have the al capones and the drug Mexican drug cartels are going to take advantage of a policy that is doomed to failure.

Prohibition is doomed to failure in the same way that if they're ever successful in terms of prohibiting the Second Amendment and prohibiting guns. You're going to see the same thing happened with guns. You're gonna have an explosion and gun violence. You're gonna have an explosion and development of guns and innovation and guns because there's

not going to be any controls whatsoever on it. New American says, policymakers must consider the danger that invading Mexico would turn out like America's recent incursions into the Middle East, particularly Afghanistan. I would say, like Syria for example, After all, it wouldn't just be traditional warfare, it would be guerrilla warfare. Yeah, they would come in. You know, this is something when Ramaswami says this, you know what naivete shock and awe. You mean,

like we did in Iraq. That's the easy part. The difficult part is the asymmetric warfare that comes after that. You know, we have a kind of asymmetric warfare where we got all the planes and we got the smart bombs and all the rest of the stuff, and we can do shock and awe. That's easy, but then you got to put boots on the ground and then the shock and awe starts that Oh wait a minute, you know, this is going to be this long war of attrition and ambush and guerrilla

fighting and all the rest of this stuff. And we have lost every one of those asymmetric wars, every one of them, but nobody wants to learn about it. Yeah, and Ramaswami hasn't learned anything from it either. Just as an Afghanistan, American troops would be subject to regular attacks and bombings in the American public would be regularly be tuning into news to learn of more service men and women being killed in a potentially decades long conflict with no end in

sight, just like an Afghanistan until you get thrown out. And so with all that happening, right, these people who don't want to have any ID for the people who cross over the borders, they don't want to have any ID for the people who go into the voting boosts, but they want all of us to have IDs for everything, and especially just like with DSA, Europe is positioning itself as an a lead position to push the boundaries of world

government. And this is what's happened with ursus Lavander Leeden, the European Union President, giving a speech at the G twenty and New Delhi, India last week or so, and so she's all about universal worldwide digital identities and tracking and controlling everybody. The future will be digital, she said. Today, I want to focus on AI and digital infrastructure, and she doesn't mean Internet

for you. That's going to be a part of it. But when she talks about digital infrastructure, she talks about the vaccine, passports and things like that. And crucial question is how to harness a rapidly change technologies. He said. AI has risks, but it also offers tremendous opportunities. He's got tremendous opportunities for them for surveillance, tremendous opportunities for propaganda, tremendous opportunities for control. And they want to control the AI, as I said in the

US, you know, we've got to have this stuff licensed. You're gotta have a license to use this stuff. We can't just have anybody out there coming up with AI. Yeah, we're gonna use AI to tell everybody that this is this is authoritative, this is coming from the computer. I got a print out here. You just do what it says and we'll build in the biases as we wish. She said, I believe that Europe and its partners should develop a new global framework for AI risks. You see, here

comes the AI mcguffin, Oh, we gotta threat. We got, we got trouble right here in River City. We got a virus that are coming, and we got that climate change is gonna kill us all, just like the virus. Just say, you still got Trump? You know, he falls back into that every time somebody questions him about don't question me. The entire world was gonna die. Whatever I did was to save the entire world. No, you killed people, Trump, nobody, nobody was dying.

This wasn't a pandemic. Is your medical rules, your You killed businesses with your lockdowns. You kill people with your medical rules and your bribery in the hospitals, and you kill people with your shot You and Biden. Everybody said, well, he's Biden the mandate these things. No, tell me that Trump wouldn't mandate. This is what I see all the time. I like it comments from people, Well, don't you realize that that Trump didn't mandate.

No, he just produced the poison and let Biden stick it in everybody's arm. No, Trump had already said, and that's why I played that all the time of the show, going back to Maya, twenty nineteen, measles. Gotta get the shot. Gotta get that shot that's going around. It's really bad, Gotta get this measles. Measles. And I've said so many times that that we is old enough that like me, he had measles,

got over it. It was extremely rare, as a factious say, and it truly was extremely rare that somebody would have any serious reaction to measles, people like Trump, people like me. We've got natural immunity and measles. We had it, and it ain't going around. And you don't need to take away people's medical decisions about their bodies or their religious objections to measles.

But he was perfectly willing to do that for measles. Do you think that when Trump talks about this virus, he's selling this idea that this virus was the worst thing since the nineteen eighteen flew. You think that if he you know, he's going to take that narrative, we got a pandemic here and it's going to kill everybody like a nineteen eighteen. If he's willing to

take away people's medical choice and their religious objections over measles. You don't think that he would have done it for this thing that he continues to say, the greatest plague that mankind has ever faced, and he saved us from it. How'd he save us with his vaccine? He wouldn't mandate that like you did for measles in twenty nineteen. Come on, So we got the AI mcguffin that's coming, We're gonna have an UFO mcguffin that they will use as

well. So think about how many different existential We're only three years into the twenty twenty decade and they're just throwing one so called existential threat at us after the other, you know, from a pandemic to the climate, to artificial intelligence. And then they're going to come with UFOs as well, and so Ursulavander Leyden says, we would need to have a similar body to the IPCC for climate that's the UN body, the International Panel for Climate Change or Climate

Control. I forget what it's in, but that's the lying bureaucracy of the UN that has been the font of lies about climate change for decades, and so we want to have something that lies to us to make this a global panic situation. We need to have a global situation like we do for climate she says, and make it about artificial intelligence. And here we need additional

outreach to the scientists and the entrepreneurs and the innovators. They need to provide the knowledge on the risks posed by AI as well as the potential benefits for humanity. And they've already done that in the United States. That's why you had Sam Altman, CEO of Open AI, and also coincidentally pushing what she wants, you know, problem solution. Look at this, I have this wonderful AI. Oh it can just solve everything, can cure cancer and all

the rest of it. But it can also be very dangerous. And so to make sure that it doesn't get dangerous, we're all going to have to get an idea and identify ourselves and all of our activity has to be monitored by the government. That's the bottom line. Oh and by the way, says Sam Altman, only people like me should be able to do artificial intelligence. And so that's what she's saying as well. We have to have all you technical people come and we'll have dog and pony shows where you can scare

us about AI. And then we can give you monopoly on it because you'll work hand in glove with us, our deputized state. She said. Also, we need a digital public infrastructure, and again she's not talking about people having internet access. India, she says, has achieved remarkable success in rolling

out its digital public infrastructure. What did they do Well, Bill Gates wanted everybody to have an ID and they had their odd Hart system and they came in with the poor people who were dependent on the government for welfare and dependent on the government for medical care. Well, you're not going to get anything from us unless you take that number. You'll not buy or sell or get welfare and universal basic income unless you take number the mark of the beast.

That's the Gate system. That's what they did in India, and that's what she is saying they want to do worldwide. She said. The trick is to build public digital infrastructure that is interoperable and trusted. Let me give you one example, she said, you're all familiar with the COVID nineteen digital certificate. Well, the EU developed it for itself and actually it's origin. As I point out when I have that, I play that commercial that we got

about the common man. I talk about the Commons project, that common project and the common past, that was a creature of the World Economic form. They laid that out there and other people created The European Union created their version of it. But essentially they put that together for people as a blueprint. Other people implemented their own version of it. And so she said, the EU developed this, and the model was so functional and so trusted that fifty

one countries on four different continents adopted it for free. They won't charge you for your chains. Yet today the who uses it as a global standard to listen to this cynicalhood. They use it as a global standard to facilitate mobility. They use it to block mobility, just the opposite, These people such liars. Yeah, yeah, we use it to facility like protection racket, you know, from the mafia. Here to protect you, you know from me. I'm going to facilitate your mobility. Here, you get the ID,

you get the mobility, otherwise we're going to block you. Yeah, I'm just in the same way that they didn't mandate these vaccines for anybody.

No, no's your choice, you know. And so she calls all this the one future, So as the one future is the single global government as that a conspiracy theory when they keep telling us that's exactly what they want to do, and so is the Epic Times pointed out, the Group of twenty nations agreed on a plan in India to impose digital currencies CBDCs and digital IDs on their respective populations, because that's what the CBDC is, you know, just like Sam Altman, the AI guy going around, you know, taking

screenshots of people's eyes to get a biometric you know, retinal scan or whatever it is that he's scanning with the eye and then tying that in to the currency, and the currency is your global ID. When Mark Zuckerberg was trying to do that with his Libre project and his white paper, he said in the middle of it, this will become a de facto global ID. You'll give me the power and I'll do this. You know, you give me the money, I'll deliver these people on a single plat as silver platter two.

So the group side of the discussions are already underway to create international regulations for cryptocurrencies. But of course that's not the band cryptocurrencies. We just want to regulate them. Yeah, you do it from the inside. You do it with chaos, and you do it iteratively, and that's what they're doing. They're doing it from the inside. It's a global id system and mark

of the beast system. Who would have thought two thousand years ago? Who would imagine that people would be able to globally stop you from buying or selling anything? And you know, who could imagine such a thing two thousand years ago? I couldn't even imagine it, you know, fifty five years ago as a kid. Yeah, we didn't have satellites yet. Oh, this has got a you know church I went to. Oh, it's got to be metaphorical. You know, it's symbolic. No, keeps becoming more and

more literal, doesn't it. Let me catch up on some of the comments that are here. Thank you so many from so many people on rock Fan. Greg Funt, thank you so much for the tippy, says, my brother has been a big fan for a long time. I agree, Well, thank you. That's really kind. On rumble, mister Kishan g thank you for the tip, he says, Good morning David and I and Crew. I know your dislike for Trump, but I don't see any other candidates

that are capable of doing the leadership except for RFK. Thanks and get Eric back on the show. I will, we need to. We went a period of time there because we were gone. I think it's a little bit longer than usual. We'll get him on a regular basis. Well again, I'll just say that, you know, it's a big mistake to put hope in Washington for your future, and it's an even bigger mistake to put the hope in the presidency for the future. So we need to put hope in

local government. We need to build the mechanisms for our survival locally, and that means pay more attention to whoever your local sheriff, and your local city council and your local mayor and all these these elections are far, far, far more important than who's in the White House. Just look at twenty twenty.

We had up in the White House, and the people who protected us from Trump and his policies in many cases were at the local level, and also at the local level and the state level, people could make Trump's policies even worse. So you're better focus there. That's where your focus should be, not on Washington, not on the presidency. On rock Fan, Angry Tiger, thank you very much, good to see you there. He said. The drug war turned a lot of normal people into felons, yes,

taking away their Second Amendment rights. The apparatus to remove a gun felony federally exists, but it is not funded. Therefore, you cannot get your Second Amendment rights back if you were convicted federally. Well, that's important to know again. Knights of the Storm angry Tiger Jason Barker, who I've also seen a comment and a tip from earlier today. There, take a look at

the Knights of the Storm. You'll get there schedule as well as guards schedule, many other schedules of a lot of people that do a lot of good work that you can trust. Rock Fan Angus Mustang, thank you very much for the tip, he says. The inmates are running this island. Yep on rock Fan James s thank you for the tip. And I see a note that doctor Shiva's delayed until eleven fifteen, so we won't be doing that.

At the top of the hour, I'm going to take a break though, and when we come back, we're going to take a look at some additional financial issues. I thought it was kind of interesting that Tucker Carlson went down to Argentina and interviewed the guy that has made a lot of and I've got some things to say, not about the Tucker interview, I haven't seen that, but about Javier Malai and also about what it looks like to live in a country that has rampant, runaway inflation. So we will be right

back, Liberty, it's your move. And now the David Night Show, Well, let's talk about one hundred and twenty four percent inflation, whereas that's the official story, as its actually worse than that, then they tell you it's highest level since nineteen ninety one. And Argentina soaring prices which rose more than expected, are forcing hard hit shoppers to run a daily gauntlet to find deals and cheaper options as price hikes are leaving big differences from one shop to

the next, with scattered discounts to lure shoppers. Yeah, the shoppers have become hoppers, hopping from one place to the other. In August, monthly inflation readings of twelve point four percent. That's just month over month increase in prices, a figure that would be eye watering even as an annual figure in most countries worldwide. But that is happening on a month to month basis,

pushing poverty levels past forty percent. That's the key. You see that kind of inflation, people get poor, and I know what that was like. Again, we didn't come anywhere close to this, but I was. I was in college when the nineteen seventies inflation hit, but it was still going strong and hitting with the high interest rates and the rest of stuff. It had not stopped for a couple of years after I got out of college.

So pushing priory levels past forty percent, stoking anger at the traditional political lead ahead of October's elections. And again it was was it last week or two weeks ago? I can't remember that I interviewed the financially I think it was last week. And again the book Economics and the Fifteen Lessons on twenty pages, number one bestseller there and the author Axel knew Javier Malai. I went on a hunch that he would know him. Turns out they're good friends.

It's so hard, said one person. Each day things cost more. It's like always racing around the clock, searching and searching. I said this woman as she was shopping for groceries and the outskirts of Buenos Aires. She said, you buy whatever is cheaper in one place, and then you go to

the next place and you buy something else. A central bank analyst poll released after the data forecast and inflation would end the year above one hundred and sixty nine percent, a sharp hike from a sestiment a month earlier of one hundred and forty one percent. It predicted monthly inflation of twelve percent in September and nine percent in October. And so Argentina is in this cycle of economic crisis. So how did they get there? The central bank? And this is

what Javier Malai points out. He said, you know, you get into this situation because of the central bank. Some central banks are worse than others. And so his solution to it since nobody wants the pace, so nobody will take it, nobody in China. And of course it's a big, a big part of this discussion is should we you know, we should use somebody else's currency because ours is gone and nobody will take it, and it

is just in free fall, and so that is the obvious solution. But the question then became, which is not a question that anybody would have asked. A couple of years ago, do we go with China or do we go with the US. At this point the answer is still the US, but it could be China. Now when we look at this, just in case you think everything is different in this country, you have an analyst saying, well, we need to see some pain. We've got to have unemployment

jump to forty to fifty percent. This is what they're thinking is in other words, they're not looking at the welfare of people in these countries. Instead, what they're looking at is their wealth and their power and to manipulate things. So Jeremy Grantham, hedge fund manager, speaking in a conference in Sydney, said, in my view, he says unemployment has to jump forty to fifty percent. In my view, we need to see pain in the economy.

We need to remind people that they work for the employer and not the other way around. We're got to show them whose boss, right Quite frankly, you know, this guy's got the mind of chairman mal I mean, that's that was the purpose of the Great Leap Forward. You know, I'm going to show these people whose boss. That was the purpose of Stalin's Holommeadar. I'm going to show these people whose boss we need to show remind them they work for the employer and not the other way around. The tradees.

The trades have definitely pulled back on productivity. They've been paid a lot to do not too much in the last few years, and we need to see that change. Crack the whip. This guy is like and it's like these old robber barons, the mister Potter from It's a Wonderful Life. Well, let's look a little bit at Javier Malai. And there's also something here not only about what is happening in terms of economics and an economic shift, but

also what is happening in terms of a political shift. And that is the basis of this article from the American Conservative, because they're talking about the international New Right. You hell, are these labels right? Are you all right? Are your new right? Are you Christian nationalism? Are? I mean, we have all these different labels that are put out there, and the

labels, for the most part, don't really mean much. For the most part, it's just a means of controlling discourse, of taking the high ground rhetorically and that type of thing. So we always have to be careful about it. Don't put too much into labels. They're weaponized always and created by

your opponents usually, But take a look at what is behind this. He did have some interesting observations about what is going on politically and about the alliances that are forming, because the money is really kind of a reflection of that. So the victory of Javier Malai and the Argentine presidential election open primary took the political world by storm. And again, you know, we talked about that a little bit with an Axel Kaiser and his you know, the author

of that book. He is a self confessed an archo capitalist, famously known as El Poluca. I guess as you've pronounced that way the wig because of his hair. And when I, when I interviewed Excellent, said, well, you know, Wall Street Journal does an article about this guy, and you would think that if being the Wall Street Journal, they want to talk about his economic policies, But all they wanted to do was to talk about his hair. And so I said, I want you to tell me what

it's on his mind. His eccentric hare, he claims, is combed only by the invisible hand. He goes to barber named Adam Smith. I guess he rose to stardom as a radio host and a frequent TV guest, while Argentina's a kind to me collapsed under rapid evaluation, three digit inflation and rising poverty. And then here's the background. Of course, you know, we all know about Evita Perone because of the musicals and stuff. You know,

don't cry for me. Argentina avida was what that was called. And if you've got a Marxist in politics, and you got a corrupt regime that goes on forever and ever, you can bet that they're going to do Broadway plays and musicals and movies about it. For eighty years, the Argentine political landscape has been dominated by the Pernesmo, a big tent movement created by one Domingo Perone after World War Two as a nationalist and populoust third way between Soviet communism

and Western capitalism. But it took a hard left turn in two thousand and three with President Nestor Kirschner, a close ally of Hugo Chavez infidel cast. So it might appear obvious why a populous uprising seems set to thrust a libertarian into power in Argentina, But as the American Conservatives Bradley Devlin has asked, and of those that might not seem obvious, I think it's what they meant

to say. How does a libertarian that wants to end the Argentine Central Bank and to privatize state assets, how does that fall into the umbrella of the international new right, which is typically more skeptical of capitalism and less scared of wielding state power. The new right, a populous right, a national conservatism, or whatever you want to call it, remains a new phenomenon, he said, And it doesn't have a unified ideological or conceptual foundation. And so

what is really happening here? Again, I don't care about the narratives there or the labels, whether they're used to shape the narratives. So they interviewed in the American Conservative, they interviewed a close ally of Malai, and his name is Augustine Lage, and so they asked him the question. They said, why did he win in these primaries and why is he now leading in

the polls for the presidential thing? They said, Well, the PARNESMO was a catch all populist movement, so it was populous, but it was populous with leftist socialist economics. And highly centralized government control. And so he said, it has dominated Argentine politics for eighty years, and now it's twenty first century socialism. They manipulated public opinion through public TV and radio. They bought journalists, they bought the movie industry, they bought the schools, the universities

through intellectual groups paid by the state. And again this is exactly what the plan has been in America. The plan for this for the early twentieth century Marxists is not about a violent revolution per se. It's about first marching through the institutions. You know, we're talking about how the Marxists are trying to

create a race war here, and that is true. But part of that is that's really only possible after they've marched through the institutions, like we just mentioned the news media, entertainment, schools, universities, that type of thing. Then they're able to go to war with us. They had the march through the institutions. They have now accomplished that, and that's why all these institutions, including corporations, are now weaponized against the values, the history,

the culture, the laws of our country. There was a group of citizens who waged the culture wars as we could as much of a culture war as we could. We wrote books, we gave conferences, we gave workshops, we hosted debates, We used our social media. We did podcasts, we created YouTube channels, we wrote on Twitter. See this is you do what you can. You know that they're going to censor you, you know they're going to shut you down, but you do what you can, and that

information does get out to some degree. And even though they get most of it, what gets through is still very powerful because it's the truth, and because people are so hungry for the truth, and so I have to keep telling myself. And you know, all of you who are involved in this, you know, Jason Barker and Angry Tiger and guard all of you. When you're looking at this, it is you know, even though it's difficult to break through with this stuff, we have to keep we have to remember,

and we have to understand. And this is a good example of this in Argentina that what gets through is going to be very powerful and people are really hungry for the truth. They know they're being lied to. Just like the people on Stalinist Russia knew they're being lied to. They said there's no truth in Pravda, which meant truth and there's no news, and as Vestia, which meant news. They knew they were being lied to, he said. Some of them were able to get into mainstream media, and that is

the case with Javier Malai. He managed to get into the systems media due to the intrinsic characteristics of his personality. He's got a very TV like personality, the hair right, so he said, our culture war began to be successful in terms of public opinion and the limits of public discourse, he says, and at a certain moment, Javier Malai decided that it was time to reap the fruits that we had been sewing, and so now it was time

to reap the fruits through an electoral struggle by creating a political party. And the political party that they've created they called Liberty Advances. That's good, This is very important. Understand Malia's victory in the primary public opinion in Argentina has turned to the right in such a way that the other two political alliances had to opt for figures as far to the right as their own spaces would allow.

That's interesting. So we had three parties that were there, he finished first, but the other two parties, even though they are left wing, they moved as far to the right as they could and they still came out second and third. So they says the bull Rich is the most right wing that exists within the Juntos El cab Cabio. The center right coalition MASA is the most right wing that exists within Kirsch and Narizmo. He says, you don't have to have any political talking in the name of social He says,

this is what the election looks like here. You don't have any politician talking about social justice. You don't have politicians talking in the name of social and collective rights. You do not have politicians talking about redistribution of wealth in Argentina. You do not have politicians in the campaign talking about leftist cultural issues.

You do not have politicians at this moment raising feminist flags or mu decolor flags, are using so called inclusive language that we're seeing everywhere in the United States. Because these people are running from shop to shop trying to find food with a little money that they've got that is constantly losing its value. They got serious there. You see. It's one thing when you look at all of this stuff that is happening that he just mentioned, you know, social justice

and you know redistribution of wealth and reparations and the LGBT stuff. These are first world problems when people don't have any real problems. But I think it's bigger than that, quite frankly. You know, as a Christian, I think I look at those things as a test because I understand that our blessings come from God, and this is this is the test. You know, are we going to follow God? Are we going to follow the culture? Are we going to speak up and stand on that, or are we going

to cave on that? This other stuff is downstream from it, you know, the politics and all the rest of stuff is downstream from that. But anyway, getting back to this, he said some basic numbers that may be useful for readers who want to understand this. We're already headed towards one hundred and fifty percent inflation. We have forty five percent of the population below the poverty line. Six of ten children do not eat every day. We have

a fiscal deficit, we have a huge devaluation of the currency. The country has two million more poor people every year in a country of only forty two million people. That's amazing. He says, we have about one hundred and sixty different taxes, and we have one of the highest tax pressures in the world. And so they said, well, something they asking another question.

They said, something that has confused people in the US is that although he is allied with a New Right and he claims to be an admirer of Trompany endorses both scenario, he seems to be cut from a different cloth, doesn't he. In the US, the populist right shares a certain level of skepticism of the free market and of capitalism, while Malay is a confessed an ourco capitalist on a theoretical level and a libertarian in practical terms. So how does

he fit into this New Right? This is what I think is interesting when he starts talking about the different labels that we have here and we need to start thinking about this in different terms. You know, these labels are very superficial, and these labels are used to cloud I think what's going on. In the same way they talk about people who are the blue states and the

red states. Red is always the color of the Marxist So of course they didn't want us to make that connection, so they called conservatives and libertarians. They called them red, and we foolishly went along with that. So the New Right is an effort to articulate three sectors that in principle would seem to be incompatible libertarians, conservatives, and patriots or sovereigntists. He said. Not all libertarians, conservatives, and sovereigntists are compatible with the New Right. For

example, a progressive libertarian does not fit into the New Right. But the most important libertarian politician in history, Ron Paul, was allied with conservatives and was completely opposed to the abortion agenda. So that others more dogmatic, who can only read politics under religious classes, these would not belong in this In many cases, they said, finally have the patriots or the sovereigntists, and on the other hand, you have the statists who do not confuse love for

the homeland with love for the state. Right, So that's the key thing, key difference, you know, confusing love for the state with love for the homeland. He says, for example, now that it's going to look different in different places. In the case of Spain, it is expected that the one who's going to take the lead in the alliance will be somebody who

is a sovereigntist. Or somebody from the patriotic sector, because the problems affecting Spain have to do with the EU government in Brussels, with illegal immigration, and with a government that has a twenty thirty agenda ministry. And he said

in the United States, something relatively similar could be said. In addition, the United States has a geopolitical situation or a confrontation with China that calls for protecting American industry from unfair competition against a political force that uses slaves to generate wealth. Now, in Argentina, it is expected that under the economic conditions of the country in the last twenty years, the sector that is going to

be capable of articulating and leading the new right will be libertarian. In other words, there that's more of an economic approach to take. But here's the key thing, and here's the key thing that is missing in our approach here in America, and that is any kind of intellectual, philosophical principle basis. That's what we're missing with Trump. That's the big danger of the MAGA movement.

And I said for the longest time, you know, even when you go back to the Tea Party, that's fine, you know, Tea Party meant tax enough already, But how do you want what do you want to do? Do you want to lower spinning? Do you want to lower taxes? If you don't understand what your basic philosophy is, what is government actually supposed to look like? And we never had that and we don't We don't have that from Trump either. There is no clear concise vision and there certainly

isn't any adherence to any principles. Well, I see now that we have doctor Shiva Ado Ray that is ready. So we're going to take a quick break and we are going to connect with him and we will be right back. The common man. They created common Core and dumbed down our children. They created common Past to track and control us. Their Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man

as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the David Knightshow dot

com. Thank you for listening, thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Thee David Knightshow dot Com. All right, welcome back and joining us now is doctor Shiva. Iya do Ray. And we'll say hello to the people who are on his live stream who are also following us. And of course he is running for

present and he's done so many different things. And he was as we were connecting while this commercial break was going on our program, he was saying, you know, let's let's follow up on what a real leader looks like. So what does a real Thank you for joining us, doctor Shiva, and what does a real leader look like? We're talking about what is happening in

Argentina, what is happening in America with Trump? Well, David, I think if you look at in my sense of real leadership is there's three elements. You know, there's a clear vision, there's a scientific or philosophical framework that you can communicate to people on why that vision should be supported. And then the last pieces of practicality or what we call the engineering. You know, how do you execute on that vision? Because it's good to talk about

stuff, but you've got to be able to execute on it. And this is true I think in any endeavor, right, if you're serious about something, if you're an entrepreneur of a very clear vision, you have to have some physics or science how you're going to achieve that vision, and there's a material reality of how you execute it. That's right, and to me,

that's those are the sort of the three foundation. If you tie that into our the foundation of our country, you know you've got a clear articulation of the view of the general view of what government's purposes, and the declaration of independence, and then you got the plan and the framework of how you're going to achieve that in the Constitution. And we seem to just that doesn't really matter anymore. We just do whatever we think is going to make us popular

or give us a fame, fortune and a following. Right. Yeah, I think you nailed it. And the reason this has happened is I think you mentioned this about how Hollywood essentially finds characters you see, to run their operations. They have the front You may have seen that swarm video I did, David if you haven't, you should check it out. It's a fifteen minute video that I really explain. You know what the swarm is. It's

not really a swamp because it means it's a geographical location. And what's important when you go through that, you really understand that the forces of power, profit and control have people who are just interested in power, right, the hundred university presidents, you know, the let's say those people were involved in the nonprofits like Clinton Global Initiative, right, all these kinds of people.

Then the other people are interested in just profit maxim maximization of profit at any cost, right, which includes the central banks, you know, the probably two thousand leaders of the major CEOs. And then front facing is you have the way to control the masses, and the controlling of the masses involves the obvious establishment. You know that everyone says, oh, yeah, they're evil, right, the Clintons or which is by and large people sort of understand

that. But the more I think the insidious people are that not so obvious establishment, the Trumps, right, the Joe Rogans, the Carlson's as I like to call them. Right, And we're going to talk about our interaction with Alex Jones you know, and it's important of a candidate conversation. I stopped going on Alex's show and you had a falling out with him, and I think it's important for the public to understand why we sort of don't support

that anymore. And it's a deeper discussion which follows into this obvious and not so obvious establishment and they've What's really happened, David, is they've gotten so good now the swarm itself evolves, it's intelligence evolves. So they're watching, you know, you know, the behavior of our movement, that the fact we're getting on the ground and handing out leaflets, right, they're watching that. You know, we're relentlessly exposing Kennedy, We're relentless exposing Trump. And

in response to that, they see they have enough data. Wow, people are starting to follow doctor Shiva. They're starting to absorb his content, and so immediately they'll manufacture these people actually mouthing back our positions, but to lead people back into the establishment. But that dynamic is what people need to get

educated about. But coming back to what you were saying, David, is, yeah, the founders had a clear They actually had sort of a classical philosophical framework, right, coming out of sort of classical liberalism philosophy right right at the period of the Enlightenment. Then they had the engineering because these guys were engineers and surveyors and architects. You know, Jefferson could build stuff.

Franklin was an inventor. You know, Washington was a surveyor. They actually had to build real things with their own hands, not like outsourcing to others. So and then they had a very clear vision, right, which was there were inalienable rights. This is quite profound. And because they were builders and they were scientists and they were visionaries, they materialize all of that. You know, they said, okay, you're going to balance the power.

I mean that when you look at the documents that they wrote, they're like engineering diagrams to me, you know, they're like prints, they're specifications. There any of these fellows here could I mean, I can't think Trump even writing one sense of the Declaration of Independence or constitution, right. I can't think of Booby Kennedy doing any of this, you know, so what we have it would kind of read like chat GPT, you know, it's they

would be trying to plagiarize something I talked about that earlier. It's really kind of a joke. It can't turn it into English type of thing, you know, and it's a plagiarizing in and then translating it into English. That's what they would probably do. But that's a key thing. You know, they had a vision, a clear vision. You know, the government is

there to protect our rights. That's the principal mission of the government. They set up a framework to do it and to guard against as much as possible, but of course it has to be enforced by us. And then it was their character that was the other part of it, and that was a big part of it, you know, the character that you could believe these people to follow through and to execute what they talk about. That's the thing that is that's why people become so cynical. We see that crucial element seems

to always be missing. Even if somebody's got a great plan, they don't execute on it. They do exactly the opposite. And they were told that it's forty chest. Don't worry, he's still on our side. He's lying to the other people, not to us, Right, yeah, I think what's happened, David to this character piece, what's happened is a degeneration of these basic fundamental values. And the degeneration piece has been to convince people,

look, our leaders ultimately reflect our consciousness. This is my view, you know. So they convinced people that your personal integrity and your public integrity can be two different things. There's an interview with this fool Booby Kennedy as I call him, and that's what we should call him. And I call him that because I want people not to have respect for these people. And the interviewer starts talking about how you know herschel Walker, you know, said one

thing and does another thing. Right, He said he was against for pro life and then he had various abortions or his own uncle who killed a woman. Here, Ted Kennedy. So Booby's squirming and he goes, well, let me tell you your personal integrity and your public integrity are two different things. Wow. The people quote unquote to Megan Kelly, So you have people telling you to your face. This is the new their new ethos. I can do anything what I want. I can hire prostitutes, I can you

know, have relationship with them when my wife is pregnant. I can pay them off. I can travel with Epstein on his plant I can travel with Epstein, but Christian evangelicals will still think I'm a redeemed good, you know, saved human being. Right, So they have manipulated people to lowering their standards at such low levels, David. And so what needs to happen is

you have to set the standards high and you cannot compromise. And those people who come you build a movement around that, and then like a magnet, you bring more and more and more filings over right. But if you if you compromise to the thirty percent of people have no integrity. In my view, you know, are resistors. Fifty percent of people are watching which way the wind blows. Their ethics are based on which way the wind blows.

And there's twenty percent who will always stand firm. And my view is, you don't count out of the fifty percent, You don't count out of the thirty You completely don't even argue with the thirty even, you know, But you mobilize the twenty with the highest values in our case, truth and freedom and health right, and you educate those people. You educate those people that you should have a really vicious you know, you have to be like a

Doberman to those thirty percent of the people. And these numbers, by the way, David, many many years ago, and I was like twenty nine years old. I was running a company called Echo Mail, and I was invited to speak to the top twenty five hundred General Motors executives, all right, with a guy that I shared the stage with, the very, very

wise guide by the name of Price Purchett. He was one of the world's leading organizational theorists and and GM was having major problems in and he got up on the stage and he said, look, thirty percent of people in your organization. And by the way, he had studied all different organizations, pigmy cultures, aboriginal cultures, you know, nonprofit organizations, fortune one thousand companies, and he always noticed thirty percent of people are complete resistors. They will

always never want to do anything. Okay, fifty percent of people are the fence sitters, he called him, and then twenty percent are the change agents. And he said the biggest mistake change agents make they spend ninety percent of their time arguing with the thirty percent, and they burn themselves out. So he said, you have to be like a doberman at those thirty percent you have to viciously annihilate them because they will destroy your organization. So in my

view, Trump, Booby, Kennedy. You know, now they have this other brown nos, Brahmin, big Pharma, bullshit, Vivike the snake, right, and they tool see Gabbard another one, right. They manufacture these people, and these people are typically the ones that, you know, the eight billion people are taught to say, well, but you know, they did say some nice things. David, David, why are you attacking Trump?

You know he did work hard for us. You know, Booby didn't do this and that, And those are the people that are used to manipulate the other fifties. So it becomes it's not just that they'll say, well, sometimes they don't even have to come up with something nice about their candidate. They just tell you how awful the other guy is. You know, you don't want this other guy. You take anybody other than that guy. So you know, let's go with this. And they always give you a

choice, you know, say you're b it's dialectic this flyer. We came up with a lesser of the two children. Yeah, and that's become the focus, the core of the campaign. So what is the vision that we have, David, a very clear vision truth, freedom, health, and notice I don't use the word and it's truth health, it's a composite structure. So vision wise, you need all those three because without freedom you can't do any real science to get to truth. And without truth you can't really

understand what's good for your economic health, physical health, infrastructure health. And without health you fundamentally have no way of fighting for freedom of truth. You don't have to wear with all, you don't have the strength. So in my view, all those three have to exist. So that's a clear vision,

the philosophy and the science of that, David. You know, at the time of the time of our founders, you know, they were coming off the Enlightenment, right or the period of great new findings in chemistry and science, et cetera. So these people were very moved by science, right. The physical sciences were being you know, physical chemistry was coming with the work of Lavasier and all these kind of guys, right, So they had

a physical sense and they had a deep curiosity. So they were including scientific philosophy some of you know, classical philosophy, right, and then they so here in the we live today, David, when you step back in the world a very complex systems. Now, the systems we have today really didn't exist. You know, in seventeen seventy six, we didn't have a transportation system, we didn't have healthcare systems, we didn't have election systems. Right,

was much simpler. So it was only the nineteen hundreds and the nineteen fifties at the science of systems came. So so system science, which is, by the way, what the elites learn. George Soros is one of the leaders in the field of reflexivity theory. So if we want to be a leader in today's world and you don't understand how systems work at a scientific level, you're just a moron, okay, because someone else is going to

tell you what to do. Right. So, as a system scientist who studied this for years, in order to achieve that vision of truth, freedom, health, and to really do a system's overhaul, that's what we're at. You need to have a foundational understanding of system science. So we now educate people on that. David. It's not only for the hallowed halls of MT. And then the engineering is you have to get on the ground.

There's no other way to change the world anymore. Because social media completely controlled by the elites. The First Amendment is destroyed. On November sixteen, twenty eighteen. Trump is the one who signed SISA into law. The Cyber Security Infrastructure Security Agency, as my lawsuit revealed, is the one that allowed the

unholy alliance between government and social media companies to destroy the First Amendment. Trump did unanimously voted by every member of Congress, by unanimous consent by every member of the Senate. So everyone needs to understand that all of these people were involved in destroying the First Amendment. They passed a law which your bridges our freedom of speech, and what does the First Amendment say? Congress shall pass no law to bridge freedom of speech. That's what they did, brought to

you by Trump. That's right. Yeah, And you got back and you look at sissa. You know the way I pronounce it. But you know they used to always be sispah, Right. They tried over and over again to get CISPA through there. What was the p why'd they take it out? Well, because that was protection, right, and we all know that

what it was protection for was for the corporations. We're going to be protected from any liability when they spied on us as the deputized state, and so when they finally got it through, they took that out and pretended that wasn't really what it was about. It's about protecting us. It's always about protecting us in it when they enslave us and they they withrow the Constitution, it's always about our protection and our safety. But that's the subversion that was there

from the very beginning. And of course, you know, going back to twenty and eighteen, that's when they first started openly colluding and censoring on a massive scale. And uh, and it's it's been that way ever since. I mean, I can't even get I've been kicked off so many times off of YouTube. I don't even bother to get on anymore. I just you

know, go to Rumble and other places like that. Because the last time I got kicked off, she was because I had I thought, well, let me just put up some Christmas music that I did for the program, and I have, you know, music that I do is for a little bit of a break that's about a minute. So I had several Christmas songs I put up. That was it. It was just Christmas music, and they banned me after six months, no explanation, So I can't even put

music up on YouTube. I'm I'm a bad person. What's happening is anyone who gets massive visibility by the mainstream media or what I now call the grifter media inc. You know, the Joe Rogans, the Carlsons, the James O'Keefe's right, you can go down the list. It's a grifter media they are. And they may even say negative stuff against them, right, that is allowed because that's a fake dialectic that they're creating. Anyone who exposes that

swarm is shadow band. Yeah, that's right. And you know, I know this at a very personal level because in twenty twenty, as you you know, as we've shared before, when they you were one of the few people to cover it when they when I was thrown off Twitter for exposing the government backdoor portal into Twitter in twenty twenty, which Glenn Greenwall and Carlson concealed. Tucker, Carlson concealed it, he had all of it. They waited two years to delay the truth that was a limited hangout, was a CIA

intelligence operation that Tucker did with the intercept. That's what really happened. Then Elon Musk, another goon of the establishment, was brought in to essentially sugarcoat and make the Conservatives think, now Twitter was a safe place, yes, and all the Conservatives fell into line denish to SUSA another opportunist, come bag, okay, James Woods, every one of them. They started bowing down

to Elon. And now you have Isaac Walter, Isaacson doing a big biography on him, who, by the way, comes out of the Aspen Institute, which is like this with the wf Right. So they are creating their false heroes. So now they have their neo media swarm, Tucker Crlson, Elon Musk, Joe Rogan and these people promote the dialectic. So you Booby Kennedy who says, oh, Elon Musk is fighting censorship when he knows he came to all, he came to all of our lawsuit hearings. He knows

a backdoor portal still exists. He knows Elon has done nothing. He knows Elon and government are like this space six billion dollars Elon got he got what one point five billion dollars from government to make Tesla profitable, and the Section two thirty. Immunity ensures that Twitter so elon Musk where government ends at elon Musk. Nobody knows. So all of these guys are part of the swarm. And when you expose them is when they shadow Vanue. They put you

into what now, it's a digital cage. They let you on Twitter, but they control it. Right, the censorship ten point zero? Right, what's great, David? The good news is this, and I want to share the good news because in twenty twenty we got our stuff out to about a half a billion people. There was a time when the censors hadn't it up right. So now when they make us invisible, David, we have so many people saying, wait a minute. Doctor Shiva is the one who

ran the Firefauci campaign. Why is Megan Kelly now covering it? Wait a minute. Doctor Shiva is a one who talked about the immune system and how you need to boost natural immunity. Doctor Shiva is the one who discovered the backdoor portal. Why did Carlson wait two years? Why isn't anyone of him

interviewing him when he's probably the most qualified candidate to become president. He's got all the degrees, he has a science, he has an engineering as a vision, and that active invisibility that they're doing David, in my view, it's going to destroy them and it's a good thing. Yeah. Now, added to that, we encourage people to get on the ground, because when people get on the ground, they can't manipulate this. We tell people in a simple way, old school, take a bumper stick or put it on

the back of your car. One hundred thousand people see it. So we're encouraging people to make them empower themselves to think, to fight and to heal, and no one else is going to do it. And then we've given them the operating system to do that. David. You know, all the science that I could still be just a professor at MIT teaching, right, we've taken it out of there and brought it to the masses. So that's what's exciting, David. So and I think it's important that we get out

that we transcend these systems. As you point out, you know, when you look at the electoral system. I got involved with third party stuff thirty years ago as idealistic enough to think that maybe we could make a change with it, and I found out just how control the two party system is from ballot access to debates to the rest of stuff, and it's only gotten worse.

And so they control this from the inside very rigidly. I mean, just take a look at what is happening with the debates, even what is happening with the debates between the different candidates and how they're being shut down. I think it. You know, the Democrat Party has taken it to a

new level to protect Biden as we're going through all this. But that's the way they can manipulate these things from the top down, and that's how they control who even gets on the think they're doing something even more insteady of David.

What's happened is if you look at the Democrats or the Republicans, typically they have the obvious establishment wings, right, let's say the bushes or on the right or the bidens, they're getting the swarm is actually getting more intelligent, David, And we need to understand this so we don't get fooled by Booby Kennedy because he's a complete bullshit. Let me expoke why if you go back to nineteen eighty four, you remember Jesse Jackson, right, remember him?

He was running for president, right, So they had the obvious establishment which was Reagan, and let's say the obvious establishment candidate, which was what's his face Mondale. They had the wings of the right, which were like the emerging Tea Party, and they had the wings of the left, the wings which which sometimes will talk against the establishment, like Jesse Jackson would say

stuff against Mondale and he was building a quote unquote a movement. At the last minute, Jesse Jackson brings all of his votes and he says, look, we need to choose a lesser of two evils. Okay, And the left and the right have been doing this. What's happened recently if you look at the Sanders that was his job. Sanders did that in twenty sixteen for

Hillary. He took all the young volunteers and got, oh yeah, Hillary, she's part of the establishment, you know, did that thing even though he's with them, says all the words to act like he's anti establishment, and then at the last minute he gives all of his votes to Hillary Clinton. All right, this selection Bernie. Typically they wait until like November to do that or October. Bernie's already done that, right, So in my view, they don't have and not so obvious establishment on the left. That's

where Kennedy comes in. Kennedy, literally, David, I can show you word for word, has spies come into our campaign literally steal our content word for word. And so they are setting him up and potentially tool see Gabbard to come in to be that new not so obvious establishment mouthing all the stuff

and being the alternative to the quote unquote the democratic left wing. Okay, And I think one of the things about Kennedy that has bothered me the most is, you know, this this new book that he's done, which is all about the Wuhan lab And I see this, as I did from the very beginning, as as a move to legitimize all these pandemic actions, to say, hey, this is a real pandemic and it's the Chinese, and we got to go get the Chinese because the Chinese are the enemy of the

establishment. And so to me, that was a real establishment move of misdirection because you know, again forgetting let's ignore the vaccine and stuff like that, let's focus on the Wuhan. I think that is a real revelation of where he's coming from. When you're talking about, you know, being a fake composition that really is well, David, They're both connected because remember the Kennedy's,

there's two threads that go through the Kennedy's. They were the really the purveyors, the beginners of pioneers of global imperialism, you know, US imperialism. John Kennedy was not fighting the military industrial academic complex. There's a wonderful video that just came out. If you look at the Kennedy's on the imperialist front, Kennedy was an absolute imperialist right and then but they the camelot mythosis created forgetting the fact that he was a reckless idiot. He blew up.

He created one of the biggest blunders with PT. One oh nine. You know, he wasn't even allowed to go into the Navy. His father had to get him in, you know, Joe Kennedy. And then when after he was shot, because it was a mob war my view, one mobster fighting against another mobster, they had to make him as though he was fighting against the establishment, when in fact, four weeks before he dies or is assassinated, he says, we must stay in Vietnam. He wanted to escalate

the war there. The video just came out. Okay, then they make the brother seem like Robert Kennedy, the father of Booby, seemed like he's some peacenick. He's giving a massive talk on the floor of the US Senate, completely supporting lbj's escalation of the war. And then Booby is a multi tongued snake. When he launches his campaign, he says, we are in Ukraine quote unquote for all the right reasons, and he goes, however, I'm against regime change. Oh, but I want to thank my son who

went and fought there. Well, he's the one who endorsed Hillary Clinton three times, who's a mistress of regime change right everywhere she went. She's the one who did the regime change in So that's just on the imperialist front. And now going after China, trying to create the dialectic that it's US versus China, right when you know that both of these organizations have worked together against

people. Right. If anything, the whole concept of bricks is a new, not so obvious establishment to move the trillionaires are going to move capital out of the US to these emerging markets, you know, destroy the US and bring them back. So, now, if you go look at the vaccine thing. You'll see the same thread of what a scumbag he is. Go back to John F. Kennedy. He's the one who created the nineteen sixty

two Vaccination Act, which created all those corrupt institutions in government. But most importantly, it said government has a right to come into your physical body. That was done by John Kennedy, all right, nineteen sixty two. Then twenty four years later, people are getting injured. They're filing lawsuits legitimately in the third branch of government called the judiciary in federal cases. Ted Kennedy, the guy who murdered a woman here in Massachusetts and got away with it.

Booby's uncle, John Kennedy's brother, is the one who was a co sponsor of the Senate side of the bill to create the nineteen eighty six National Vaccine Injury Program, which basically said we're going to protect big Pharma. You can't go to the judiciary and sue, you must now sue within a new government entity, more government. Yes, that they put under Health in Human Services. The incisive thing that people need to understand about Booby, he's a freaking

snake. What he says. You know, you know, when I got into the medical freedom movement. I realize all these contradictions. Wait a minute, Hillary Clinton three times here in Massachusetts, he came and endorsed his own nephew, who's pro rapidly for vaccine mandates in twenty twenty. Then at his own home, right, he'd like to have a RNA jab. But more interestingly is everyone needs to actually look at what he's saying. He's saying, I believe he said this. We have a live on video. I'm for

full vaccination of all Americans. I've vaccinated all my kids. And then he proceeds this. That's the first part of the video, and then the second part of the video is even more damning if you really study it. He says. What does he say? He goes, we must he attacks the CD seeing all these organisms that got created by his uncle. But he goes, he's going to Now getting back to the very important word to use, create safe vaccine safety. Whenever we hear the word buzzword safety, it means

more government. More government's going to get into like we talked about what happened after nine to eleven. Right, yeah, absolutely, and really get the other part of this that I talked about. The different mcguffins. They always have some kind of a crisis that they used to scare, so it doesn't really matter what it is. As Hitchcock said, right, the mcguffin doesn't matter because the multi se alkin or whatever it could be, climate change.

But they always use that to achieve their objective. And he's a true believer on that kind of stuff, and he has pushed that very hard. And you hear him say the kind of things like, well, you know, we wouldn't have to worry about getting rid of fossil fuels, have just stopped the subsidies, and yet you look at the subsidies that are there for the

green stuff, you know. And he believes that government is in the sense of the old style of Democrat selling the idea that government can solve our problems. But I like what you were talking about before in terms of the Kennedy's and the different you know, crime families shooting it out. You know, today right now, at this point in time, we haven't had any physical assassinations or anything. We had this law fair thing that's going back and forth.

And I saw an interesting thing from James Carville, the old Democrat strategist, and he said, how did we get so lucky for them to impeach Biden? They love this stuff. And I've always looked at this and I said, you know, they can't be so dense and so stupid that they don't understand how they're building up up. They want to build Trump up by the indictments and that that makes him, uh, you know, the the

avatar, the messiah for the followers of Trump. And now Carville is saying, all right, now, they're going to do it for our side, for Biden, me really, and they both will send emails and they both will like ten fifteen million bucks those emails. They got it down to a racket. Yes, what's interesting. What's interesting, David is over the last you know, two years, I've had to even though you know I knew to hung out with Trump, you know, I had the meetings with them.

You know, he thinks I'm amazing and all this, I've had to expose him, you know, hard. We've had to expose the fact. You know, over the last six months, I'm saying, wait a minute, you Trumpers, you they would make the excuse. Oh. Trump had to protect Fauci, right, or he couldn't fire Fauci. And then but when we shared with him. Look, here's a commendation award he gave yeah,

all hours before he left. Now, Megan Kelly didn't do anything about that, and part of the swarm too, So you have to wonder why she's suddenly doing this interview. That was another theatrics that they just did two nights ago, making her bring because I think Carlson has lost all this credibility. So now they need to create a new MSM person as though who's unbiased, So they bring her in. She asked, why didn't you fire Fauci? Why didn't you you know, why did you give in this commendation word?

Oh, I didn't give it to him. But they're creating the new dynamic. It's pure theater. A week ago, Trump said we will not comply. He says, when I'm back in office, I will get rid of these vaccine and mask mandates. But precisely was saying, oh, I can't get rid of them. That's what the governors forced me to do. So they have this down. David to this point, I think you're saying, with the Biden whatever impeachment pure theater. It is, so it is,

it's a pure theater. And even when, you know, even when she talks to him about Faucci, she repeats his excuses, well, I you know, it'd have been too controversial or I don't have that power, that type of thing. And yet it wasn't. You know, he didn't bother him when he fired Coomy. You know, everybody said, oh, you can't do that. The FBI directors are appointed for ten years. He fired him. He didn't even put all the money for both sides, Yeah,

exactly. And then he did the same thing with He did the same thing with Andrew McCabe. I mean, the bottom line is that the swamp is under the executive branch. You know, you can fire these people, and he chose not to do it, and even ran a campaign video which I've played here many times, where he campaigned on his obedience to Faucci.

It was a super cut of Faucci talking about how, yeah, every time I told him to do this, he did it, you know, And basically it was really kind of an emasculating thing to say that he did everything that Faucci told him to do when he told him to do it. But that was his campaign. But he had the top of the text to this amount to contribute to the Trump Pence campaign and all the rest of the stuff. I mean he campaigned on that, gave him the medal, all the

rest of the stuff he could. He could have done that, but he chose instead to turn over the government to Fauci. And as I said earlier in the program, I don't buy the idea even of the mandates. I said, uh, in the run up to the election, I said, people are going to these guys have different ways of approaching. You can offer character, you can offer sticks to get people to do this kind of stuff. And we saw that really with the wine when he offered a million dollar

bonus of people to take the vaccine. I said, Trump is going to run it out that way. He's going to run it through the corporations. And a lot of the stuff that Biden did was through corporations. He did have outright mandates, but Trump also supported mandates back in May of twenty nineteen, mandates for MMR vaccines, and he said that's going around. You got to get it. And so you know, I don't have any problem believing that he would do it. Twenty twenty one, he was the pharma's ad

man. Yes, I got the FDA to do this. He was supporting Operation Warp Speed. Yes, Eiser's revenue was you know, had lost twenty five billion. He's a one of I mean, just look at the facts. He took a million dollars to his inauguration campaign from Fiser. I mean, the data is just in front of us. The issue is David, that that thirty percent of people who are the quote unquote MAGA cult members.

Right, We're never gonna be able to change them. But we're finding, David, the more we expose Trump and Kennedy, like we do open houses every Thursdays, we're finding now a whole set of people who were coming who are truly enlightened people. Well, they need to understand. They need to understand that. Look, I'm going down the list. I said, you know, what do you think about the lockdown? What do you think about being called non essential? What do you think about the trillions of dollars training

people for universal basic income? What do you think about the vaccine all the rest of the stuff. It's like, but you support the guy who still brags about all that stuff and who still, you know, tries to tell you that the pandemic was real and it's the most dangerous thing we've ever had. That's the cognitive dissonance, and there is hope. I think that the people can transcend that, but we also have to transcend the part partisanship as

well. Well. What's happening, David, is a more we expose like a doberman, these guys, the Trump's. It initially creates cognitive dissonance, but we're finding a subset of people who are actually I wish I had some of these recordings. People are saying, you know, doctor Shiva, I really hated you for cursing out Boobie Kennedy. But you know what, for two days I didn't have sleep because everything you said was true and I had

to self reflect. And that's why I'm part of supporting your campaign in your movement. So we're starting to get these very very enlightened people, David, and those are the people that you can build a solid movement on. You say, and that's what's happening. That's a good thing. But I think it's a good time to transition to Alex Jones. Sure, yeah, yeah, we got about five minutes. I don't want to do a clickbait thing

here. What people said would talk about that. Yeah, yeah, So I mean, maybe you should just start David and all sort of hop in. But I contacted David to everyone listening, because I have the interviews I did with you, David. When I know I did interviews with Alex and Owen and you yours was very, very thoughtful. You know. The last time I did an interview with Alex, I you know I was in there. This was in the heat of twenty twenty twenty twenty one, where I

was leading exposing Fauci, leading, exposing Booby Kennedy's complicity. He was supporting lockdowns and it's fascinating Kennedy and this clan, the swarm literally goes finds another Indian guy from East Asia got called outar Buttar I called him and he called me up and he wanted and I wanted to have me to do a live with him. And I said, look, why are you supporting Kennedy when he supported Hillary Clinton, who was part of Monsanto. And he goes,

well, you know, Booby's doing a lot of good things. I said, you know, you're a star, you know, and he goes, what did you call me? So anyway, that was a conversation with boutar Alex as me on his show, and Alex and I are talking about exposing Kennedy, which is what he should be doing if he's really wanting to help people. Suddenly he Sayshiba, I'm now going to bring ROGI wutar on and I want you to have it out with him like he wanted to do a

Jerry Springer with me. Yeareak and I go, you know, Alex, I'm here to educate people about what's going on. I said, I'm not playing the game, and Alex said, you you have to do my show. You know we have I have the right to free speech. I go, you can, but I'm not doing this. That was the last time ever was on Alex's show because I realized that he wasn't about building a movement, that he was about at best entertaining people, but not about getting to

the root of the evil. And more recently, when my swarm video got like forty million views, David, it went everywhere. He took my Swarm video, put it on Info War's website and then on the bottom of the fold he's promoting Kennedy. Okay, So that's why when you realize Alex is part of the swarm. Okay, he's part of this, that's right. So I think I think to everyone listening. David was on Alex's show, and David, maybe you can share briefly with what happened while you decided to

break off, because I think it's an important piece people should know. Yeah, it's very you know, you go back and you look at the movement around Sandy Hook to try to push through massive gun control, and you know that's where the Sandy Hook lawsuit came from and that type of thing. But it was it was an all out push. They kept going with more and more sensational stuff and that's how they they got entrapped with that. But he really was pushing at that point in time to try to stop gun control.

But I noticed a big change and what happened within for wars. But and that really kind of came about with Trump. You know, with Trump, that was his ticket to fame and fortune and following, and he became a sycophone at that point in time. He had always been independent prior to that. And and you know, as I looked at Trump through the first three years or so, typical president says one thing doesn't another, it doesn't follow through on what he has to say. People project what they want on these

presidents. But that type of thing was was usual, but twenty twenty was a whole other level. It was the worst thing, in my opinion I've seen my entire life in terms of politics, the biggest attack on our country, on the constitution, on our liberties I've ever seen. And from the very beginning of this, because I had followed the types of you know, the weaponizes gain a function and things like that that I think is a very

very dangerous thing that should be stopped. And I talked about it going back to twenty fourteen. Allison Young at USA Today did a very long expose about that. It's a real problem. It was shut down at that point in time, but Fauci and Francis Collins continued to do their research domestically, and they also set up the Wuhan Institute. And so when this stuff started buzzing around but China, I said, you know, this, this wet lab

thing is absolute nonsense. But did they really have something to escape out of Wuhanna. So we need to keep an eye on that. But it was clear from January on that they were hyping this into some kind of a global pandemic where they didn't even have a body count, and don't cut us off. It just we'll just extend this, Travis. Well, they didn't have a body count, but they were coming up with the same procedures. Remind people, it was January six, if you that's when they said. You

know, they showed pictures in China people suddenly falling down. Right, it's very these dramatic pictures this virus, and this virus was now coming to the United States. That's what you're talking about, that's right. Yeah, Yeah, that was so incredibly fake. And then and then their reaction to this was something that had been practiced in the United States by the intelligence agencies for twenty years, going back to Dark Winter, which was two months before nine

to eleven. And then you had nine to eleven. The week after nine eleven, you had the anthrax attack, and two months later, Congress sent out a bunch of legislation to the States and said, give yourself the power to a public health emergency to take everything from everybody, lock everybody down until we get an experimental vaccine and they're going to be required to take it. So we knew all of this stuff I knew it, Alex knew it,

and Mike Adams knew it. All of us knew that. When I saw that, when I saw the falling down, I saw the other stuff. It's like, okay, so it usually clared, David. What you're saying is everyone knew that this whole wuon thing and this was basically a psy op that was going on, and internally, even Alex knew that. I absolutely believe that they We had talked for years about the games of panic and how they would skew the statistics and all the rest of this stuff from a CDC

to get people do the annual flu vaccine thing. And as a matter of fact, you know, Mike Adams had been involved in that as well, and Mike Adams directly challenged me on that. So, oh, David Knight doesn't know anything about math and all the rest of the stuff. It's like, I've got an engineering degree. He says he's got a science degree, but he doesn't say what it's in. He doesn't say where he got it from. I'll tell everybody where. I got mine from University of South Florida

and an electrical engineering. Look, it's not rocket science, and it wasn't even necessarily about the numbers. We were talking about how they manipulated the numbers that they had done every year on an annual basis, But it was clearly what their pattern of behavior and what they wanted from these simulations, and they all knew about that, and so when they started selling this stuff, it's

like, you know, I pushed back on that. We had loggerheads, and I started calling out Mike Adams my name, and yet Alex was giving him the show on a regular basis, you know, like, which is not a position that I had. But Alex would do three hours, and you have a guest host, and so you just had Mike on all the time. And he did the same type of stuff with me that you told

me he did with you, in terms of dumping somebody on unexpectedly. And I was told by someone that i'd interviewed that I didn't watch Alex's programs because I, you know, I had enough to do to create my own stuff for a three hour show. And they said, yeah, Alex is telling people that this isn't the bad vaccine, that the bad vaccine from the Gates wants a really bad one. Trump is playing forty chess and he's he's not doing that. I didn't believe, but let me just let me just state

that. So, so Alex was saying he was basically supporting Trump's fauci vaccine. He was saying, this isn't as bad, This isn't as bad as what Gates and the and the other people are because Trump is in there. He's pulling it back, you know, like fifth dimensional chess, and he's really his vaccine is not going to be as bad. So he's promoting that stuff again to cowtow to the Trumpers. And I didn't believe that until one day I was on. I didn't even respond to the guy. And then

one day I'm on the show with him. He wents to me come in for a short segment or whatever. At the end of the segment as the music is playing in the last thirty seconds and we're going out, you know, he comes back on and he said that, and I didn't have it. It cut me off. I didn't have a chance to respond to Alex, say, David, what did he exactly say? Well said, well, this is not the bad stuff. You know, you got a Trump is there. He's keeping this under control. That type of I am paraphrasing

it. I don't have the exact quote, but he that's exactly what he did. He sold that same line I'd been told that he was talking about. But then it got worse because when we got to the when we got to the election, and of course you know the new rules that the new scam, I should say, the new corruption of the twenty twenty election was based on what Trump did in terms of walking everybody down and doing it on a vote by mail. And so then when we get to the election.

Two days after the election, Steve Pachenik, who was a guy who I always had a lot of problems with, Steve Pachenik. Steve Pachenik was somebody who he had a long history with a CIA. He was a consultant to Tom Clancy. He's a great rack on tour and fiction writer, but in these types of things, and that's how Alex used him. And he was somebody who in reality had been involved with Operation Gladio, which is a major false flag operation in Italy, the Red Brigade and these other things there were.

It was a NATO operation. The Prime Minister Aldo Moro was kidnapped and he was executed by his kidnappers. But before that happened, Steve pa Chennik was sent by Henry Kissinger to go talk to the kidnappers and supposedly let him in to talk to the kidnapped Prime minister. And what the Italian government said after they did an investigation afterwards, the Italian government said this is a false flag operation. But Chennik came in and he talked to him, and Aldo

Moro knew that this that this was a false flag operation. He gave the order to kill him. And so this is the background of this guy that Alex has all the time. And it was a second time I had interviewed him. He came on just before just as I had my first show, and then I had when I had my own separate three hours show at Info Wars. And then two months after that started in twenty seventeen, you had the shooting in Las Vegas. I've been interviewing people all week about the shooting

in Las Vegas. And he comes on and he's supposed to come on for two segments. He missed the first segment. He comes on with a second segment and tried to stand back me to say that nobody had died at Las Vegas, and I said, I don't believe that. I said, I don't believe the official story, but I don't believe that nobody died. I know why you're doing that, you know. And so I never had him back on again. But two days after the election of twenty twenty, Chic

said, no one died in the Las Vegas show. That's right, that's right. He's pushing the idea. And the reason he did that, of course, is to try to destroy my credibility, try to get me in trouble because all of the stuff about Sandy Hook had already hit, you know, that was already a lawsuits. So he tries to pull that game on me. And so two days after the election, he went on with on Thursday. After the election, on Tuesday, he goes on with Owen Shroyer

and he says, this is a sting. He said, Trump knew everything that was going on. He's working with Sissa, right, we were talking about earlier. He's working with Sissa. They created a blockchain, watermark ballot, and they've got quantum computing. It's just throwing out all this unrelated buzz

you know, buzzwords and terminology that didn't make any sense whatsoever. And he said, and not only that, but we've got we know these people were that cheated on the election, and we got twenty thousand National Guard troops that have fanned out all across the country and they're the arrest of area. He started, He's had that two days after the election, and no one's response was Steve, I would if I if you were here, I'd just kiss you right on the lips. I mean, no question about any of that

stuff. It was absolutely absurd, and so I pushed back against that heavily on my show. On social media. I was told by Daria you know that Steve Achenik called Alex and said he wanted me fired for that, and so I but I kept on because Alex kept having him back on and that had a lot of impact. Rush Limbaugh talked about that, and you had Clarence Thomas's wife sent a text to Mark Meadows and said, I hope this is true. It was. It went viral and it was giving everybody this

hope. And that was the well spring from which stopped the steel came. And so Alex is down and stopped the steal with Ali Alexander, an ex con man and ex convict, and you know, so they're running this thing, and you know, I know I was opposing that, and I opposed it all the way up to the point where I was fired. And of

course that week I was fired on Monday. That was when the electoral colleges had David So because January sixth was that January six yeah, I was well, December fourteenth was the monday that they turned in the votes from all the different electoral college things. And I said, look, you know it's over with folks. You know, whatever legal challenges or if they could have gone there were five states that had Republican legislatures. It was razor thin. They

could have made a case for that, they didn't. So it isn't going to happen. I said, this is nothing at this point but an obvious grift. And so that Thursday I was fired and I continue and I began this program the following Monday, and I continued to warn people about that. I said, look, January the sixth is a trap, I said, is going to be filled with agent provocateurs. There's nothing that can be accomplished.

Do not go to it. Washington, DC is dangerous and so forth, And I said that every day, and my program going back the morning of January sixth, my program ended before that started. I told people, I say, get away from there, don't you know, And so you know, I oppose that stuff from the very beginning. But I knew exactly

what that was all about. But David, what's interesting is the week prior to that, January sixth, I was invited to give a talk, you know, on what had occurred in our election, which was a real stuff, chain of custody, signature verification, Mike Lindell and all these bozos another disinformation. Yeah, all sorts of out there hid the real issues. And this is what I think happens. There are real substantial issues, then these

clowns come and do a double whammy. They make money off talking crap like Ali Alexander, you know, and then they mislead people away from the problem. So I remember on January six we had a bus, you know, that we were thinking of sending. And at the last minute, on January third, I remember fourth I saw this freaking screwball, Ali Alexander, and he hit in twenty eighteen one of our screwy volunteers to try to bring him

in as this guy doesn't smell right. And when I found out he was read leading stop the steal, and then I saw him at the White House. That's when I put it all together and I realized Trump was full of that this was an operation and I haven't shared this to too many people. And literally we had a busload of people and I called it off, and all Trumpers were really angry with me. Oh, doctor Shiva, why aren't I said, something is going to happen there. I said, this fool,

Alie Alexander is a scumbag and he's going to do something. And we had a number of young people who probably be in jail right now, and many of their parents called me, say, doctor Shiva, thank you. But I could see Trump was with Alie Alexander. Stopped the steal was a mon making organization, Yes, and Trump took all of my material, the real stuff, and they juiced it up and they made about a half a

billion dollars. Well, if you go back and you're looking, it was even Roger had a film crew that was falling him around and so they've even got him filmed saying this is great. We're gonna make so much money out of this. It's gonna be like falling off a log, and that's what it was about. It was simply, it was about making money and building audience. And what could be accomplished by giving money to Alex, you know, to hold these rallies and stuff. Nothing and nothing could have been accomplished

on January sixth. It was all done by mid December. And like you, I understand how elections are rigged. And as I said before, it begins with the ballot. It begins with the bates, and it begins with all the rest of stuff, how closed the political processes. But then it also goes through all of the electronic stuff. And for years I had covered, you know, how easy it is to hack into voting machines and various things like that. They've had voter village at Defcon and black Hat Conference and

so forth. They've demonstrated how vulnerable these machines are. But Trump added a whole new level of vulnerability with a vote by mail. I'm going to mail out the ballots to everybody, and for him to complain about that and the other thing that I was angry about. On the morning of January sixth, I said, okay, so yesterday January the fifth, we had the runoff in Georgia, not a single thing was changed about how the election was done

in Georgia. And look what happened. They just turned the Senate over to the Democrats. And of course, even though we don't have a pandemic going, we still have our elections are going to be run under those pandemic rules that Trump put in. Now, tell me that's not a double cross. That makes me furious when I look at that, I think. I think, David, the key thing that you just brought up is they have two goals. Make as much money as possible and get as much visibility as possible.

And people really need to understand this. It doesn't matter. It's all theater to them. Yes, you get indicted, great, more money, more visibility, Yeah, okay, Megan Kelly interviews me, more money, more visibility, whatever happens, they get more money and more visibility. And then there are other scoundrels like Booby Kennedy and Vivake the Snake. All of these guys fault. It's part of the swarms ethos, screw people over, create fake dialectics, make in fact, make these events take place. So

I came to the conclusion that Trump made a lot of money. When I met with him, you know, he after all of this, he did a big shout. I goes, oh, I want to thank doctor Shiva who did all of this work. Yeah, I did all the work for him so he could have the credibility to make that money. And when I met with him for two hours, when I left and he had just endorsed David in Massachusetts. This is last November. A guy who committed the election

fraud against us and Trump invited me to Marlago. I didn't go. My assistant wrote him an email saying, we respectfully refused to come because you just endorse someone did the election fraud. Again, it's our campaign. When I went down there, because I was down in Miami, people begged me, oh, doctor Sheva, go, doctor she would go. You should give Trump a chance. Don't be so hypercritical. That two hour meeting was clearly you know it was in a small room. He looked like an actor in

the back room. Okay, very frail. Do you know what the fuck is going on? Frankly a moron? Okay, raising me apologizing why you endorsed this guy? Taking notes of my sound bites that he could use in his next speech. That's what that meeting was. And I left realizing this guy's just a hollow shell. He's a puppet and what he cares about. So he kept asking me, David, in that meeting at least twenty times, what do you want for me? Like izo I'm some sycophant, I

said, I don't want anything from you. Two weeks later, I said, you know what, that guy raised a lot of money off me. Why didn't we set a real election systems Integrity Institute up? Because Harvard Stanford, they have all their intellectuals always saying nothing's happening. So I went back to him and I said, look, you made a half a billion dollars. Why didn't you set aside some of this for this institute? Didn't want

to give one penny David. No. If you look at the people who have been coindided with him, it's a very foolish strategy because he's not giving them any money. He made the first day, I think he made four million, The next day he made three. But it's like first couple of days he made seven million dollars. But he's not paying for any of his

codefendants legal fees. He is Finally, after a couple of weeks, he's going to hold a fundraiser from them, but he's not going to give him any of his money, you know, and that's a very dangerous thing if these guys are gonna swing, you know. I think that's the whole reason that they indicted so many people. They want to get them to testify against him. So there's a real game of thrones. I mean, these people are out there there. It's even though he has been built up into this

anti globalists, which he is not. He gave the globalists everything that they wanted. He even gave people training for universal basic income. Look at how many people don't want to go back to physical work, you know, they want to work from home or not work at all, and you have as they make demands for them to go back to work, they just quit. And so he gave people a taste of this, knowing what was going to happen. Spend all of that money just from the financial side, but he

did everything that the globalists wanted to do. He's doing the same stuff that you know, people like Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron and Justin Trudeau and all

the rest of it. They're all doing the same thing. But Trump, we're supposed to believe, is the anti globalist, He's just the the you know, the fake professional wrestling version of this, and so people need to understand that it is just to show and you know, he's all these people are in it for themselves, and I just this is the thing, though, I hope that we don't have, as I've said, a civil war, because I keep seeing people get more and more polarized and partisan in this

thing, not looking even after themselves. It's only simply about Trump, and you really see this about January sixth. I don't care what happens. I'm gonna go defend Trump, and I don't want to make him the Mason Dixon Line of a new civil war. And that's what they're trying to do. And that's that's something we've got to be very concerned about. Yeah, I think getting back to you know, when I titled this conversation why David Knight

left Alex Jones, you know, a conversation. I think the key thing here is Alex Jones represented himself as some independent journalist, but at the end of the day, he fell in line with the globalist front man, which is what Trump was and what happened he should you know, once you know who Ali Alexander is. I mean, you're just gut instinct. You look at that guy. He looks like a snake, Okay. And I was very very fortunate listen to my gut instinct, David, and he pulled the

plug on that bus. A lot of people would be in jail right now. And I believe that entire January six was an operation by Trump for the swarm too, as a honey pot to find all of these people, bring them in, and to jail them. That's white thesis, Okay. And probably fifteen years from now someone will do an Academy Award winning movie which you'll show that. You know, we'll just look at what happened, look at the results, regardless of what his intentions were, look at how he responded

to all this, and how he let these people swing. You know, he could have pardoned them before he left. He didn't pardon them. He didn't pardon Julian Osange. You know, he pardoned the criminal, white collar criminal, friends and family of his son in law and other people of that ILK, but he didn't do anything for the people who laid their lives on the line for him, nothing at all, and he doesn't care about the

rest of the world that he's unleashed this poison. He continued to promote that until only about four or five months ago, that you know, it's the greatest thing ever produced my mankind. It's a miracle as a moonshot, all the rest of this stuff. No, it's killing people, and we all know that. The amazing thing to me is the cognitive dissonance of the people

who know that. And I've seen it over and over again by political commentators who hate the vaccine, and they hated the fact that Trump would promote it, but they would say, Trump, You've got to stop promoting this. It's like, why would you give him just reject this guy? You know it's a lie. Do you think that he's that dishonest or is he that stupid? And why would you then, you know, keep giving him this

advice. I mean, I saw that advice coming from Alex Jones, from Wayne Allen Root over and over again, all of these different commentators that you got to stop promoting the vaccine. People hate that. It's like, why do people hate that? Let's talk about why they hate. It's because it's killing people, you know, stop that. It's just amazing to me.

What I'm saying, David is they're giving him advice, not the benefit of others, but to maintain their own credibility because they know they have an individual was part of the swarm, and they're making money off of it. Alex made a load of money promoting Trump. Okay, all these follow the money, and you know when I had to do the just like I had to expose Kennedy, you know, all these women were like, oh, you should work with Bobby. We want to donate you a lot of money.

This is guy's full I could have played that game, but I can't. Yeah. Right, Oh, you know talk about the money. You know, it came out with this lawsuit that he had, the Sandy Hook lawsuit. Record amount of money that he made the spring of twenty twenty betraying this company, this country. Just amazing to me. I mean, I knew he was making a lot of money because they said, well, you know,

the storable food. People can't keep up with it. And it's like, well, you know, who knows what Trump is going to do to us next, so we need to prepare, you know, have some storable food or whatever, but her made a record amount of money, and then of course he finished it up again at the end of the year with the election stuff, just like Trump. Did you know hundreds of millions of dollars Trump made. Yeah, it's basically using these crises to perpetuate them without any

solution and manipulating people. Yeah, crises, those solutions. They do not want to build a movement to address the fundamental issues. They want to perpetuate the crisis because they make money talking about the crisis. That's why when I look at Carlson when he was at Fox News, he's texting people David and Will end on this right, It's like it's like another Alex Jones. You're texting internally like what you just shared, telling people there is no election fraud.

Then he sees some aga movement wanting that news, goes out shares it and the reason that Fox. I don't care about Fox, But what what Carlson did was tee up Fox to lose probably four billion dollars in trouble damages because they had enough data. The fact it would have been defamation with malice, right, because he internally knew that he didn't believe any of this stuff. Well, then, of course it was also the Rayps. It was

also the Rayps stuff. You know, they fired him the day after his sixteen minutes did the Rayps thing because they're going to get serious about it. But you can see with Darren Beaty at Revolver, with Alex, with Tucker, the rest of these people, they focused on Reyps. Why would they focus on Reps. Did Rayps make hundreds of millions of dollars getting people to go to to Washington on January sixth? No? Did they go there because ray Epps told them to go there? No? If ray Epps is an

agent provocateur. And again, the place was riddled with it. And you knew that there was going to be riddled with it. You look at anything that the FBI does with all that stuff, you knew that was going to happen if you had an ounce of sense, and of course these people all did know it. That's what makes it so bad. They knew that it was going to be filled with agent provocateurs, but they wanted to fill their pockets with money. They didn't really care what happened to these people. But

you know, just in the same way that you're talking about Carlson. I've seen the same type of stuff behind the scenes. I know what these guys think and I know what they say. I know what they think and say about Trump, and it's come out occasionally. You see the videos released of Alex going off on it. But I know what that stuff is about. It's fake and they don't say what they believe. They betray the country,

and they do it so they can make a lot of money. It's just that I think it's really Look, whether it's Alex Jones, Carlson, Donald Trump, all of these people, they actually hate America. That's how we have to It's a very clear line. They do not love this country. They do not stand for these values. They may say they do, but you look at their actions, yes, they do not. You know, Tucker Trump could have led all those people. He could have pardoned those people

instead. Pardon Jared Kushner's father, right, who hired a prostitute to blackmail his own wife. Yeah, that's the kind of people he pardoned. Right. He's the one who told people I will follow you. It's in words, I would follow you to the capitol. He had the other way, right, So all of this theater, everyone needs to pretend this is literally like w W E theater and don't you get that? And by the way, David, you know who who is Donald Trump's agent? Who has the

guy from wrestling that McMahon or what? Who is it? Ry Vanuel? Emanuel? You know part of the Rahm Emmanuel who owns ours Agency? And Endeavor who owns UFC who just bought w WE? Is it one who is Trump's agent? Okay? So all of this is theater. It is. Once people get that, they're going to get very very angry, once they really understand how they're being played. Trump it wanted to be an actor. He's an actor, Okay. Alex is an entertainer. Carlson is a CIA

frontman. All right, these people don't give a damn about you. And the only way forward Alex, you know. Closing, I just want to say, look, the reason I decided to run was we need to build a movement. And I decided to run because we can use the chaos that they're doing to direct people back to you. And everything I say to this is about empowering you. You have to understand truth, freedom and health, they're interrelated. We have to build a bottom up movement and I'm one of

us. Why isn't one of us always there? And they do not want to give visibility to us. So the only way out I keep telling people, Alex is I mean, I'm David, is I tell people to go get this bumper sticker, because when they do this and they peel it and they put it on their wind shield. Some people just take it and they leave it on their dining room table. But when they do that, it's a physical act that they're doing of activism. We have open sourced all of

our flyers. Of flyers start with the fact that the US life expectancy is going like this, so your children is going to die younger than you. And it's not the vaccines. It's a systems problem that goes back sixty years. It's a you know, from an engineering standpoint, David, it's a set of things right. And then we teach people who is a swarm and that they have to get educated and they have to go on the ground.

They have to become warriors and scholars. So that's what we're doing, David, and that's why our campaign is very fascinating because I'm seeing this evolution of people. We're getting over the Trump getting over the Alex Jones is getting over the carl Sins and everyone we get over David is like a razorblade to the swarm. You know, once you've found out that you've been to see once you come to that, realize it's difficult to get people to admit that they've

been fulled. But once you realize, right they pull that wool over your eyes, well they're not going to do it to you again, and you become really angry about that. And I know that from a personal experience. It's been great talking to you, doctor Shiva, and give us your website where people can find you. Yeah, so Shiva should go people, I should go to Shiva Shiv a numeral four president dot com and you can, you know, get these bumper stickers. Right, That's the main thing I'm

getting. We want to get millions of these out there. And if you go to the download section, David, people can get this flyer. You know, I go out to the train station. I give them out at least once a week. We have everyone out there. We want to get millions of these out. The other thing is people can go to Truth Freedomhealth dot com and that's where they get the training David. The scientific training they get basically engineering systems training, David, that they don't have to pay hundreds

of thousands of dollars for, but they and we have a community. Our model is you take the course, you can give it away as many children. You get to be a philanthropist. So it's really a learned, teach and serve model. And the last thing is I tell people to go to vashiva dot com slash orientation. We do an open house every Thursday's at eleven am and eight pm, for example, and it's their educational open houses.

Yesterday we talked about noise pollution, how noise affects the physiology, and we went through that, and in the morning we talked about the real costs of gun violence, the real costs beyond left and right. So they're very and we take systems approaches to this, so people break out of the dialectics, they actually see things what they are and what the solution is. David,

Well, that's a key thing. We got to break out of that, you know, Gilly and dialectic, the dichotomy, the false dichotomy that they give us. We've got to break out of this party system and we need to focus on ourselves, on our community, and not so much on Washington. We need to keep an eye on Washington. We need to understand what these guys are up to. But they don't have the solution. They are the problem, always have been. Thank you so much for joining us.

It's been great. Well, thanks for sharing everything. Thank you, be well, thank you. That's right, thank you, And so that's our program for today, about a half hour over. But thank you so much for joining us. Have a good weekend. And no, it's uh. Apologize for the language. I know some people had some issues about that, but you know, it is. It is what it is. I did not realize that's kind of I would have said something to him about that and

before we started. But thank you so much for joining in, and have a good weekend. We'll see you know on Monday, hopeful. Let me show you the day the night show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Knightshow right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else, You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at the

David Nightshow. Dot com that's a website.