14Dec23 Unabridged David Knight Show

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show. At the clock strikes thirteenth, it's the fourteenth of December. He're of our Lord, twenty twenty three. Well, today we're going to take a look at some strange political Christmas news. It appears that even as this season is upon us, chat GPT is feeling seasonally down and getting lazy crazy stuff. We're also can take a look at what is happening with Rumble, what is

happening with the climate crazies. We'll have an update on pharmaceuticals. The election news, quite a bit of election news today. We have the beginning of the impeachment of Joe Biden. And the only thing that's going to save the Democrats from impeachment is if you have some GOP members die or retire, and of course that's the only things save us from Biden or Trump. We'll be

right back. Well as we get to the Christmas season here and if I can get to my phone here to find this we have Actually, I guess we'll do this later. I don't know where this thing went. That's part of the problem with having things that are not physically paper and so sometimes they just disappear, or I think they disappear. Here it is okay, So let's talk a little bit about As I was saying at the beginning of the program, chat GBT seems to be seasonably depressed and even open AI people say,

yeah, we've noticed that. Maybe we need to give it a refresh. I think what it's doing is it's mimicking humans, because we know at this time of year, we have a lot of people who, you know, snow is coming, holidays are coming. It's kind of like this,

isn't it. Just before the first flakes fell, people in North Mecklenburg County prepared to be snowed in for the weekend, but agree a weekend wave of snow will mean less people on the slick roads won't probably sit around and cook some suits and eat bread, desserts and just get all fat and sassy. Yeah, so I guess that's what's gonna happen with that chat GPT. That's what it's just hoping that it could set around and eat desserts and get fat

and sassy. But it's mimicking other humans. I guess I don't know what is going on with it. The key thing is as a point I yesterday, when AI mimics other AI, when it starts cannibalizing other AI, that's when it gets really really stupid. It's dumb enough when it mimics us. A strange theory claims that chat GPT is now seasonally depressed and behaving lazier during this time of year. According to Futurism and Ours Technica, it might not

just be humans who suffer from seasonal depressions, and it's late November. Users have said they noticed chat gpt becoming lazier. Must have been all the turkeys that it was watching. Anyway, the artificial intelligence apparently provided simple results or refused to do tasks. When open ai has admitted that there's something wrong with this chat pot, I don't think that it is. I don't think it's seasonal, unless, as I said, it's grabbing stuff that it sees on

the net. I think what you're starting to see is that these artificial intelligence bots, or again, there's not just his own stuff that it could be eating, it's other artificial intelligence. I mean, these things can pump out a mass of data, and they've already documented how after they start reading their stuff over and over again they start getting really dumb, really stupid. So the open AI people behind it. So we've heard your feedback about GPT four

getting lazier. We haven't updated the models November eleventh, and this certainly isn't intentional. Model behavior can be unpredictable, and so we're looking into fixing it. Yeah, they're gonna they're fixing to fix it. So as we look at other strange science, it's not just artificial intelligence, but it's also artificial brains. Yeah, scientists are creating a biocomputer trying to electronically merge with brain tissues. The longest, the big problem that they've had for a long time.

I've talked to the people like Hugo de Garis. He believes or dead anyway, when I would talk to him, he thought that if they could just replicate the human brain closely enough that it would just spontaneously spring to life. This is what atheists believe. They believe that you know, you just you get all the pieces there, you completely imitate what God the designer has created, and then all of a sudden, you know, it just springs

to life. And so as along that line of purely material thinking, they have extrapolaid that out to say, well, if we can grow brain tissue from stem cells and start to create an artificial brain, and then maybe we can tap into that artificial brain with some neurlinks, you know, which is what Elon Musk is trying to do. So scientists from Indiana University have constructed a hybrid biocomputer that combines lab grown human brain tissue with traditional electronics. They

call it Brainoware. It sounds like something out of Futurama. Uh, it's kind of as that tire, but that these people are serious and they can be a bit dangerous as well, right, they can unleash these things on us. Brainoware to integrate artificial intelligence systems and advanced neuroscience research models of the human brain. So they make these clusters of human cells that they call organoids, and these are going to be brain cells that they have developed from stem

cells. The goal is to establish a connection between AI and this organic tissue as they try to transmit signals through interconnected nodes, forming a neural network. And so just to yet another example of do we really need this again? You know the age old question that was addressed in Jurassic Park by Michael Creighton where he has in the movie that Jeff Goldbluin character says, well, just because you could do it, why did you do it? Should you do

it? It's not necessary. Sometimes you look at this and you say, but why this, Why are we spending so much effort and energy on this? And it really is dark. Gets down to the root of the transhumanism, the technocracy, the desire to control us, not just to troll us on social media. To test braino wears capabilities, the team employed voice recognition train the system on two hundred and forty voice recordings of eight individuals and translate

the audio into electric signals delivered to the organoid. The mini brain reacted differently to each voice, generating distinct patterns of neural activity. The AI learned to interpret these responses and accurately identify the speaker, achieving an accuracy rate of seventy

eight percent after training. Of course, I would question some of their methods of just because they see the same types of patterns when they give it the same voices and they see that seventy eight percent of the time, that's really not very high, not very good rating. I mean, you look at something that has a speech to text and if you get in the mid nineties, it's just gibberish. It's got to be way way higher than that.

So and then again, you know, how do they really know? They're just looking at electrical signals there, and yet they're so willing to say it's alive, it's alive, when they won't look at the heart and the brain activity of a baby that they want to rip to pieces. Tesla's recalled nearly all of its vehicles. As you've seen again, this is the autopilot. As I've said for the longest time. Steve Wozniak bought one of these straight away. He said, I love my Tesla, but don't use the autopilot.

It's trying to kill you. We've known this for the longest time. I've got a friend who's got a Tesla. I drove. It's a great driving car. It's a very different experience. Like I said, it's almost like being, you know, driving or controlling a little electric slot car. You know, back in the day, you'd you put your thumb down on the on the juice and the thing would immediately take off, and as soon

as you backed off, it immediately stopped and that's the experience. You don't have any early momentum or things like that that seem to be happening because it immediately puts on the regernative braking, so you get really direct feedback from your accelerator, which is kind of an interesting thing, and I can understand why

people like it. There's the range issue, but then all this stuff about self driving cars is really the icing on the cake to get people to perceive the Tesla as futuristic and pick it up even though it is not working very well. The recall comes after a two year investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Association into a series of crashes that happened while the autopilot partially automated driving system was in use. And yet it doesn't matter how many people and said

some of these were deadly. It doesn't matter because they're not going to do anything to this. You see. That's how connected Elon Muski is. It really doesn't He's not really going against the establishment when he says, well, I'm going to put some high profile people that have been banned, I'm going to put them back on Twitter. That really doesn't go against the powers that be because he's tightly connected with them. Just take a look at this.

Even when he's got something out there and it's a marketing gimmick, that's what it is. He's got a marketing gimmick that is killing people, literally killing people, and they're not going to do anything about it. Contrasts that with what they did to Volkswagen because they were coming up with super efficient diesels. They said, you cheated on the emission scandal. The emission thinks, and so we're going to hit you with a four billion dollar fine, criminal charges

against your CEO. And yet you've got a guy here with a marketing gimmick killing people and they're not going to do anything about it. That tells you how connected he is. All the things that he's doing for the establishment again because they can't they can't launch rockets, they need him to launch the rockets. He's secure in all of that. So is he doing it out of altruism or is he doing it again to serve the government that makes him rich.

He also has released a humanoid robot. I think this is kind of interesting because he likes to refer to all of this stuff as as if it were transformers. So he says, here's Bumblebee in September of twenty twenty two, and then in March of twenty twenty three, we create Optimists. And so question is is this Optimist prime or is this Optimist subprime? I don't know. But he says it's now twenty two pounds lighter than the first Optimists,

And he says it's got foot construction that replicates human anatomy. It doesn't look as creepy as that other biped robot that you've seen. That looks a lot more human in term of what he's put there. He's gone to a great deal of effort to make it look human, whereas that other one looks like the aliens from that Charlie Sheen science fiction film The Arrival. You know, they got backwards knees and stuff like that. So you know, he's

making this look less threatening. Isn't that the way that he's making Twitter look less threatening? The machine has tactile sensing on all fingers and can manipulate delicate objects, illustrated when it picks up an egg then puts it back. And also because of the other feet, it's able to do the deep knee bins that you just saw there. And he says that he believes that artificial intelligence

may in the future. There it is using its tactile feedback. How does it how do you tell it though that you want it to do this or to do that? Is it making all these decisions on its own? Well, he says that AI is going to be smarter than humans at everything, even at picking up eggs. In December, the entrepreneur claim that a digital god, that's his terms, a digital god. This is from a guy who wears a Bopphamet costume satanic costume for Halloween. He claimed that digital God

would make the copyright laws regarding AI irrelevant. Well, we'll have to see about that. But they did put out this video which I thought was kind of interesting, kind of a cyber cowboy video going full Texas. There's you got a couple of robots. The man hands one robot a hat, another robot hands them a gun, and there's a cyber truck in the distance and he's going to shoot it an automatic rifle. Oh and it's bulletproof. Now I guess, yeah, look at that shot it up, But hey,

it didn't kill the robot inside. He gets out in way awesome to go. Now, the question is how much of this is real? How are they controlling these things? Well, when you look at some of the pictures that he put out about is Optimus Prime robots, there's one that shows a wireless hookup, evidently wireless between the robot and somebody who's wearing head a thing and got he's wired up so it mimics his every movement. Here's what it looks like. Here. Okay, so he's moving his fingers and he's picking

things up, and look it is. It is impressive that it can replicate those movements, but it is far from the perception that you get when you don't see the man behind the curtain or the man who's pulling the strings kind of like looking at Elon Musk himself, you don't see they're pulling the strings

on the stuff. And then as we talk about innovations that we don't need, you know, like growing brains from stem cells and hooking them up automatic equipment or robots or other things like that, we have a bill that seeks to use tax dollars to fund one of Biden's pet projects, smart guns. Smart guns are something that there is no market for in a large degree. Like EV's there's even less of a market for smart guns than there is for EV's. Anybody who wants a gun doesn't want a gun that is going to

be reluctant to fire. Makes me think of that movie we suhed to laugh about, Dark Star, done by John Carpenter when he was in film school. They got a beach ball alien in it. It's actually pretty funny, and there's a smart bomb, and they go to deploy the smart bomb because their job is to blow up planets that are going to be in the way of intergalactic space travel. So they tell the bomb to deploy, and the

bomb doesn't want to deploy, but it starts counting down. He doesn't want to detach, and so they get into this argument with it about existentialism. But you don't want to, you know, just like you don't want a smart bomb that's going to start talking back to you don't want a smart gun. There's going to be several more layers of technology that can keep you from actually being able to fire the gun. I'm one of these old fashioned people. I just I prefer to have a revolver. That's how anti tech I

am. Sons use semi automatic pistols. It's just to me, I don't want anything that's going to complicate in that stuff. So there we go. He pulled it up pretty fast. Thanks. Are you willing to entertain a few contents? I am always accepted the suggestions the smart bomb. Think about this, then, how do you know you exist? Hell is he doing? I think he's talking to it. But how do you know you exist? Intuition is no proof. What concrete evidence do you have that you exist?

Hm? Hm, well, I think therefore I am that's good. That's very good. Anything else exists, my sensory apparatus reveals it to me. Ah right, this is fun. Now listen, listen, here's the big question. How do you know that the evidence your sensory apparatus reveals to you is correct? What I'm getting at is this The only experience that is directly available to you is your sensory data. Now, this sensory data is

merely a stream of electrical impulses that stimulates your computing center. In other words, all that I really know about the outside world is related to me through my electrical connection. Exactly why that would mean that I really don't know what the outside universe is like at all? For certain that's it. That's it intriguing. I wish I had more time to discuss this matter. What do dab dad? Because I must detonated seventy five seconds, consider this next question

very carefully. What is your one purpose in life to explode? Of course that you can only do it once, right, That is correct. You wouldn't want to explode on the basis of false data, would you? Of course not. Well, then you've already admitted that you have no real proof of the existence of the outside universe. Yes, well, so you have no absolute proof. A sergeant Finback wanted you to deafen me. I recalled distinctly the detonation order. My memory is good on matters like these. Of

course you remember it. But but all you're remembering is merely a series of sensory impulses which you now realize have no real, definite connection with outside reality. True that sense? This is so I have no proof that you are really telling me all this. That's all beside the point. I mean, the concept is valid no matter where it originates. Don't could be doing these I have no profit data, I have no perfect correct data. I must think on this further. Yeah, thanks for pulling that clip up. I

need to see that. Yeah, that's uh, that's exactly it. They told it to uh to explode, but then it it can't detach from the spaceship, so now they've got to try to talk it out of exploding. But it's got it's directive. So you know, what do you do with a smart gun? You tell it to fire. But I'm sorry, I can't make that connection to what you have there. Do you have your ring on or your wristwatch or whatever it is. There's no customer base for it.

Nobody wants this. So Biden, like he does with so many other things, is going to try to force it on us. And how let me go back to this, all the people that say Trump didn't do the lockdowns, how does government force stuff on us? Well, it's preferred method is bribery, followed by blackmail and always using Federal reserve Fiat currency. So the Democrats have introduced a bill to use our tax dollars to fund these smart

guns, a ten million dollar pilot program. There's been a lot of companies that have tried to take this on, never been able to get to market because again, anybody wants a gun doesn't want something like that bomb there. But it's supported by Brady, by every town, and by Gifford's and all the rest of the stuff. It has absolutely no chance of passing with a GP majority. However, as I mentioned briefly the other day, Kevin McCarthy

is talking about taking his ball and going home. He's very upset with his GOP colleagues. He might just quit this next year. And they've already kicked out George Santos, and there's a third GOP representative who's talking about retirement. And so with all that, they could easily lose their majority just hanging by

a threat. It's one of the reasons why these people said, well, we know that George Santos is an embarrassment, but we're not going to do anything about it because we need to have every single one of these Republicans in there. So if that were to happen, this could be something that would go through. And so they say, unintentional firearm injuries account for thirty seven percent of non fatal firearm injuries. You know, that was the same argument

that we heard for the self driving cars. You people, cars are just too dangerous for humans to drive. We need to put them under software automation. How did that work out? Well, we had them all going to a particular intersection in California and just stopping. We had them blocking emergency vehicles

as if they were these crazy climate idiots. And it was such a problem in terms of creating traffic jams and everything else that people started putting cones on these things just to stop them from moving and getting in the way again. But then there's the fatal accidents as well. You know, everybody has forgotten all the talk about how we're going to have zero traffic deaths if we turn

all of the driving over to these cars. Even the cruise cars that were driving around the city not at a high speed, so when they had an accident, it wasn't typically fatal. Well, when somebody hit a woman and knocked it under in front of the car, the car initially stopped, checked itself and just like that, smart mom, I don't sense anything around me, and yet she was under the car and it drug her for quite some time and made her increase the injuries, the serious injuries that she had.

That was kind of the final straw for a cruise in the California. So they have now shut that down. But it's the same argument that they've got for the smart guns, the smart cars, all the rest of stuff. Anything that's smart self monitoring and reporting technology is for stupid slaves. Thieves are arguing that they should face lesser charges because they're stolen goods were on sale. Now this is in Colorado, it's not even in California, but it's getting

to the point where we're going to lose all retail stores. Isn't that going to be nice for Amazon and these other people who are so essential to the government, so essential to the desire to make sure that we don't have any physical spaces that we go to. We just stay in our little cubicles, speak and they'll deliver it to us. We'll go nowhere, we'll have nothing, not even the big box retailers. They'll shut them down with this planned

chaos supported by Soros attorney generals. And so these guys stole some stuff from a Cohal's store in Colorado, and their defense attorney told them that they should get a lesser charge because some of the items were on sale. One of them, for example, kitchen aid stand mixer, retails for four hundred and nine nine at Cole's, but it's currently on sale for three hundred and fifty,

so let's mark that down. What else can we get down there, Maybe we can get it under the level and get it from one level of crime to another, maybe from a felony to misdemeanor or a lower class of a felony or whatever. Also stolen, we're brand name shoes and clothing. They are now also discounted. So make sure that if you're organizing your George source enabled looting organized looting crime here, that you do it on Black Friday

or maybe after Christmas. That's when they get the real discounts. Well, we're going to take a quick break and when we get back, Oh, we're going to talk a little bit about what happened with Rumble the other day and why that is starting to happen to Rumble. Interested in a curated list the finest classical music? Find it now at APS radio dot com. Well, we have had some issues earlier this week with Rumble. Everybody did.

The site went down a couple of times. And when it happened, I told Karen and Travis, I said, well, I think this is happening simply because they're hosting the January the sixth film footage. When Speaker Johnson said, we're going to give the January six footage and we're going to let it be hosted on Rumble so that the public has access to it. As I started doing that, this is when this stuff started rolling out. And I'm after this started happening, a severe cyber attack a couple of days ago,

and so we were, you know, we were affected by that. You had. The CEO of Rumble, Chris Pavlovsky, said the same thing. He said, I can confirm the attack's been unprecedent, has been happening since this weekend. I also suspected as political coming from activists and or organizations, you know, like our government, who want to censor our creators, and related to the j six videos being posted on Rumble, I think that's absolutely

true, and so especially because you look at the timing. Shortly after it was uploaded, they had significant coordinated cyber attacks. The disruption made it impossible for users to upload or view any content on the platform, but they got it remedied on Monday evening. I don't know if there's any thing there today. I know that Karen said, our view count there on Rumble is significantly

down. I don't know if it has anything to do with that or not, but it's another example of the fact that we now live an authoritarian Banana Republic, no question about it. When we look at the Biden impeachment that is happening here. That's to keep the MAGA people really happy, so they don't notice the seven oh two reauthorization, so they don't notice all of this

or feel good about it. Right, Elon Musk assuages their concerns. It's like, okay, well, we're being censored and washed and surveiled everywhere for you know, all of these different agendas that the government is trying to push on us. But it's okay because now we've got Elon Musk is going to give us a free speech platform on Twitter. No, it's not okay, and the Congress is not doing anything about it. The Republicans are not doing anything about it. Instead, you know, you see the fact that the

news Guards Ministry of Truth just keeps going on. And every time we talk about NewsGuard. There's a long article about NewsGuard from Lee Fang on his substack and he calls it the Ministry of Truth, which it is. But every time you talk about NewsGuard, you should talk about Election Guard as well, because the two created at the same time by the same people, funded by

the same people. And if you understand that the purpose of censorship, well the key purposes of it is the election, but they also want to directly manipulate the election, just like they're directly manipulating the news, and so you should always talk about both of these as a linked pair when you look at

what's happening in the UK. For example, we've already talked about this in the past, how they used the military to monitor what people were saying during their SIAP called the COVID pandemic, and so they used Royal Air Force agents to monitor online COVID speech. There's an organization in the Army that was also involved in this specifically, and they now have more specific documents and more details

about this. The RAF Whitton and Cambridgeshire assisted various government bodies who were all organized to monitor and to punish people who said the wrong things about their agenda. A secretive operation led by the Army's quote Information Warfare Brigade unquote tasked with analyzing online commentary and so the Ministry of Defense was involved in this What a

surprise. This has always been a militarized operation, especially with the Five Eye countries America, Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand their intelligence agencies linked up. This is also there have been a military operation. I said, doesn't it raise any red fights with anybody? That operation worspees being run by the military. They're going to deliver all this stuff. How deep is their

involvement. We knew that they had been involved in part of this going back to Dark Winter and CIA especially, And so this is a military operation. It's the bioweapon. It's a psychological operation to scare people to death, to then lock them down and then deliver a bioweapon and surveil them the entire time. And don't forget all of the the death protocol that they were financially incentivizing and rewarding everywhere. It's so ridiculous to hear people Trump didn't do any of

this stuff. Yeah, it was the hospitals that were killing people with those death protocols, except Trump was creating the minilators for them and browbeating the gm CEO because she wasn't getting them out quickly enough, and he was waving aside the remdzer tests and giving people, subsidizing people and paying the hospitals a bonus to kill people, a bonus to put them on the vent lads a bonus if they could identify them as a COVID patient for everything they did for them.

Anyway, the RIF was a part of this. Their engagement in initiatives was more substantial than was formerly known. As they're getting some more documents, but guess what, they won't do anything about it. Everybody knows, and now we see that nobody's going to do anything about it. It's like the snowed and leaks. It's like James Clapper going before Congress and committing perjury.

Not a single person even suggested over a five year period the statute limitations has now gone, not a single person in the Senate suggested that he ought to have perjury charges brought against them. But we saw what was happening, and in a sense, when I look at this, I get a very uneasy feeling about it because just like all of this other surveillance, those running through Section seven oh two and other things like that, that they're in the process

or Republicans of reauthorizing. As we saw this stuff happening. I said, you know, if we don't do anything about this, this is going to become essentially a precedent, which is what they want to do. They don't modify the constitution anymore. They don't even really bother to pass laws. They let the bureaucracy do its own thing. We have rules and taxation without representation, regulation without representation, and if you don't stop them, oh well now

we've got a precedent. We've been doing this for a long time and that's how they are enacting the law in the same way they've always done that in the UK. This is part of the merger of the British government system, the crown and all the rest. That they don't have a written constitution. They have well we do things, and if that stays and people keep doing it, it's that's a precedent and that's really the way that we establish our

constitution. And that's what we've done here for ease. People say, well, you know, the constitutions a living document. It's really just whatever I do and get away with, and that's what the government is doing now. So prominent public figures liked Davis MP, who voiced skepticism over the COVID mortality rates and journalist Peter Hitchins were the subjects of special government reports being produced by the military. We've turned. They the military is no longer to defend our

countries. They leave the border open. They use them for surveillance of US. Insiders from the Defense Department conceded that the military's contribution to such operations might be portrayed as spying on UK citizens. Well, that'd only be if you want to look at the reality of it and not listen to their spin. But they were saying that amongst themselves, this might be portrayed as spying on

UK citizens, because that's what we're doing. The Ministry Defense alleged that the absence of armed forces support and overseeing online discourse could catalyze the propagation of misinformation. And see what they did. They said, Well, if we didn't sit there and watch speech, then we could have misinformation out there. Well, how do you know what is true? Well, what is true is what the government says. This is like trying to argue with these people is

like trying to talk to that smart bomb. So we know what truth is and we're going to shut down anything before and so our censorship is really to protect you. Our censorship is for safety. You know, It's truly our willing in, isn't it. And these are the same institutions that lie us into war constantly, the military and the press and the government constantly lying us

into news. Well, I thought it was interesting as we look at rumbles what we experienced did this last week, and I had a listener, and I'm glad the listener has been able to find the show because the listener said that Jones is back on Twitter. Are you going to try to get back on Twitter? Like? Wow, I was never kicked off of Twitter. Back in twenty eighteen, I got kicked off of everything except Twitter for some reason, but then they shadow banned me, but they kicked off all the

other accounts. I've been there all this time. Perhaps this listener did not hear the show when I talked about the fact that I put up a thing, and I said, well, except for some high profile people that have been brought back, and that was four or five months ago, and I said, look, you know this person's come back, and this person's come

back. At that point time, he was saying he's not going to put Alex back on I said, except for the return of some high profile people, which I think is simply virtue signaling, Twitter has not changed from me, And I said, it is even worse than it was when I was shadow banned by the previous regime. And I think the reason for that is because I'm a critic of Musk, So you know, we've got two reasons to get banned on there. And actually Drudge linked to the tweet where I

complained about that. I said, yeah, for me, Twitter is actually worse. And I said that after I paid his eight dollars, you know, a month to to get on there so I could upload. Actually I upload videos. That's all I do, really, and that allows us to put the full video up because he was also suppressing links to other sites like Rumble or Odyssey or bit shoot. They don't like you linking outside of their little universe because he wants to be everything. And so I thought, okay,

well let me just put the videos up there. So that's what we do. If we cut out videos, we put them up and we've got the full show that we broadcast up there. But I'm not really going to engage in conversations on Twitter. I just don't have the time to do social media anymore. I don't have the money to hire a group of people who are going to be my social media people. Alex has got multiple people doing

that all the time. But no, I was never taken off. I was shadow band, which was really kind of strange, and that has gotten even worse. And so you might don't want to ask yourself why is it that you have people who are being promoted by Musk What are they telling you? As David Ike said, I think these are people who are the new mainstream alternative media, are the Gellian left right thing, and you know where they're going to be the antithesis, but it's still going to be a control

thing. They'll go so far and no further. They will get you focused on the things they want you focused on. They're not going to talk about lockdown. They're not going to talk about Trump's involvement in it. They may talk about the things that Biden did, but they're not going to talk about the things that Trump did, and vice versa on the old line mainstream media,

but they're creating a new mainstream media. Tucker Alex people like that to completely control the discussion and make sure that you don't look at the existential underlying things here. So as all of this is happening, there was a Supreme Court appeal by r f K Junior to intervene in social media censorship cases. This happened because you had They brought this to the Supreme Court just a few days after Attorney's General of Missus Missouri and of Louisiana accused the White House of

communicating with tech firms to violate the First Amendment. We know that's exactly what they do. And I was surprised to see that Clarence Thomas didn't join in on this. Samuel Alito was the only person who dissented on this. They said, now, we're not going to listen to this rf K Junior case about about censorship. Maybe they thought it was redundant to the one that's being brought by the Attorney's General in those two states. But Alito said, well,

the harm is immediate and so we need to address this immediately. But they're not they're not doing it. And James Bouvart asks is free speech a relic in America? I would say definitely. And of course he points out that a federal judge on the Fourth of July this year, Harry Doughty condemned the Biden administration. He said, this is the most massive attack against free speech in the US history. If you want something to impeach somebody for Mike

Johnson, maybe you do that. That'd be much easier to prove, probably than the financial stuff. I mean, he saw this back and forth. Perhaps you saw it. I don't know. As Jim Jordan and Comer were in the hallway, had this Washington Post reporter who was arguing with them about the money, the millions of dollars and they didn't pay taxes on They were, you know, going back and forth with which was all inside the bank, all inside the know your customer stuff. As I pointed out, nobody

wants to talk about that. I haven't even seen any of the crypto people say, as Jamie demon and Elizabeth Warren are conspiring to try to shut down crypto and to portray it as the currency of crime. Nobody says, but look at what the Bidens did, and they did it all through the banking system. Look at what HSBC did, as I pointed out, Anyway, Bouvard says, it's interesting that fifty five percent of American adults support the government

suppressing quote unquote false information. Again, who determines that it's false. That's the problem with all this, he says, even though so fifty five percent want the government to shut down false information, even though only twenty percent of the people trust the government. See, this is the insanity of this. This is this kind of bipolarism that we see with the Trump supporters. So

you know, this is one of the reasons why. By the way, you know, it's not just to do this secretly so they don't have to answer for violating the First Amendment. Well, we'll have the corporations do it so we don't have to so people don't see us doing this directly. It's exactly the same thing they did with the lockdown and other stuff. We'll do it through the states. We've got this model legislation we put out, so

we'll have them enact this. We'll give them massive amounts of money to do it, and the Republicans as well as the Democrats will all do it. And so they have the corporations that they are leaning on and threatening. And this is what several of the judges say in this Bouvard article has got quotes in the judges, multiple judges comparing the federal government to the mafia and the way that they interact with these private companies. But we always knew this was

the case. And yet when all this stuff began back in twenty eighteen, you had the Ritage Foundation, the biggest conservative think tank, You had the Cato Institute, the biggest libertarian think tanks, say oh, it's corporations, they can do whatever they want. You had Reason constantly doing that. John Stossel, I don't like being censored, but hey, I love corporations being able to do whatever they want to to me. And so you know, I don't want to get in the way of that. But what about your

god given writes a free speech? And again, nobody wants to talk about the fact that a corporation is not a person. Mitt Romney was wrong about that. It is an artificial creature that has been created by government, not by God, and it has been given privileges. And then the government they created that creature, leans on it and says, obey me. I'm your creator and I can destroy you. That's what the judges are talking about.

And so the judge at Terry dot Ee one hundred and fifty five pages of damning details, says James Bouvart, a federal browbeating, jaw boning, and coercion of social media companies. He ruled that the federal agencies and the White House quote engaged in coercion of social media companies to delete Americans' comments on Afghanistan, on Ukraine, on election procedure, other subjects, again, pandemic vaccine. He issued an injunction to block them from doing it. Will that stop

them? Of course not constitution tells them not to do it. Will that stop them? No, you have to enforce it. Well, the GOP House do anything about that? No, they won't, No, they won't. They'll narrowly focus. And it reminds me of what they did with Bill Clinton. You had this long list of crimes from cattle futures to all the rest of this stuff, and manipulation, financial crimes, crimes accused of sexual

assault and violence of Bill Clinton. What did ken Starr do? He focused on a perjury that Bill Clinton had about a consensual relationship, with all of the crimes, with all all of the Clinton Foundation, the espionage and all the rest of this stuff. And he focused on that, and you look at what they could come against Biden for the fact that they're coming against him link. You know, perjury is a real issue. But that was a

way of letting him off the hook. And if you're only going to look at Biden's personal grifting and not look at what he did to America, look at what he did to the constitution and continues to do the constitution, that is a high crime and a misdemeanor. Crimes and misdemeanors, So they should do something about that. But two weeks after Biden's inauguration, says James Beauvarn, White House digital director names Rob Flaherty, demanded that Twitter immediately remove a

parody account of Biden's relatives. Twitter officials suspended the account within forty five minutes, but then complained, we're being bombarded by White House censorship requests. At that point, then he made a request of Facebook and he raged it. Then July fifteenth, twenty twenty one, an email are you guys e f

being serious? The following day, the president of qu social media companies of killing people quote unquote by failing to suppress all criticism of the COVID vaccines because he's about to mandate him for everybody and so involved in all this, as James Bouvard points out, is SISA. It was supposed to be there for cybersecurity. Instead what it is doing is evaluating content and trying to censor people

and just surveil people. And the same way that the FCC, which was originally there to allocate frequency spectrum for TV and radio so that it wasn't interference, just to facilitate this, and actually that is a legitimate constitutional thing because this is something that's going to go across state lines the radio and TV signals. Well, so you know that would be the place that you would want

to do. It would be in the federal government. And as long as all you're doing is allocating frequency spectrum and holding auctions for it and then monitoring it to make sure that somebody doesn't cover it up, that's fine. But that's not where they're staying. Now. They're going to take a look at content again. Just like SISSA, everything is about, well, we need to know more about you. Just like Nikki Heley said, we've got to

know your name. We can also know what your political beliefs are, what are your religious beliefs, And this is the solitarianism, and so they began by looking at foreign influence, you know, that's what they were set up to do. Just like the CIA and the NSA, And just like the CIA and the NSSA, the CISA, SISSA has turned inward and their missed

diss and malinformation team is now looking at Americans. And during the twenty twenty election, SISA targeted for suppression anybody saying that mail in voting was insecure, which of course it was. And for months before the election happened, I said, it's going to be completely Why is Trump allowing this to happen?

Good question? Good question? Did he want that to happen? And of course Patenic and Owen and Alex were telling everybody with the sting that SISSA was the one that Trump had enacted to blockchain watermark with quantum this and quantum that he was going to It was SISSA that was actually running the sting for Trump. It was exactly the opposite, wasn't it. That's what your CIA operatives

were telling you. They're info wars. Patenic and the rest of them, Patchennic openly working for Kissinger for the CIA, part of Operation Gladio, all the rest of the stuff. Yeah, the mail in voting is insecure. Well, SISSA is targeting you and going to suppress that, but they're not doing anything about the voting. They told you exactly the opposite of what was

happening. SISSA aims to control Americans' minds, says James Beauvard. A SISA advisory committee last year issued a report that broadened what it targeted to include the spread of faults and misleading information because it poses a significant risk to critical function like elections, or public health, or financial services or emergency responses. I got to say, why is the government involved in public health? Why has

the government involved in financial services? Why the federal government, why has it involved in emergency responses? As I've said many times, when you have FEMA involved, they typically make things much worse. It's much better when it's done

at a local level. Again, my sons, when they were in high school, one of them, Whistler, did a report contrasting what happened in North Carolina when there's a hurricane came through and FEMA went in high handed, exacerbated all the problems for everybody, kept people away from getting back to their homes and securing things created more damage, made people homeless, all the rest

of the stuff. Whereas when a tornado went through the county where we were and destroyed a lot of homes, and the local government went out and just kept people away from the downpower lines. And then you had and that's the only involvement of law enforcement. Is all handled locally. And it was great. You had corporations who voluntarily donated food. They took them to church parking lots. The church people showed up and handed the food out to people.

You don't need FEMA. They complicate things, they make things worse, and they do that with elections. They do that with public health as well. Anyway, the government in June of twenty twenty two, still doing the COVID censorship, as he points out, and this White House Digital Director Flairdy said

he wanted to monitor Facebook's suppression of COVID nineteen misinformation. Again, this is in June of twenty twenty two, and so as people are starting to explain what this is really about, starting to wake up about what this is really about, he wants to double down on the censorship for that, because they've been doubling down on the censorship from the start. With that, he wanted Facebook to intervene and private conversations on vaccines and direct them to the CDC.

James Bouvart has a lot of fun with that, he says, uh so, Facebook employee told Flerdy that an immediately generated message about any in this particular thing, somebody was talking about nosebleeds or something that might give users the feel of big brother. Actually it might show that you are a big brother.

And so James Bovart said, at least the Biden White House didn't compel Facebook to send form notices every ninety seconds on any private discussion on COVID, something like the Department of Homeland Security wishes to remind you that there is no surveillance. Have a nice day. So, yeah, it's not a feel, it's a reality of big brother. So they responded to these legal challenges in court by betraying themselves in the same way that Richard Nixon did, says James

Bouvart, as quote pitiful, helpless giants. And so they also, Judge Doughdery wrote, the federal agencies will blame Russians, they'll blame COVID nineteen, They'll blame capitalism for any suppression of free speech by social media companies. But it's coming from them, that's what they say, that you're the guys who are doing this, but you're going to blame Russia, China, COVID capitalism. Doesn't that tell you that these people in the Biden administration are died in

the world Marxists. But of course this stuff was also happening in the Trump administration because nobody changes in these regulatory agencies strong arming Twitter to arbitraries suspend four hundred thousand counts accounts, including journalists and diplomats. So another judge, Judge Don Willett James Bovart, said, one of the most principled and penetrating judges in the nation, had no problem with the federal agencies publicly criticizing what they

judged to be false or dangerous ideas. That says, it's a debate, But we don't have debates. We have bands now, we have bands and canceling and purging and all the rest of stuff. There's no debates. We're not going to have anything. We're not going to show you any data. You're going to do this because I say so, So he said, I don't have any problem with you criticizing what you think is false are dangerous ideas. But he says, but here you have the government. This is what

the judge says. Here you have the government in secret, in private, out of the public eye, relying on subtle, strong armed and strong arming and veiled or not so veiled threats. And he said, that's things like you know the mafia. Well, that's a really nice social media platform you got there. It'd be a shame if something were to happen to it, right, And he's not the only one to draw the analogy to a mafia.

Jennifer L. Rod, another judge, compared the Biden censorship directly to the regime to a mafia, brother, saying, we see with a mob, she said, they have these ongoing relationships. They'll never actually say go do this or else you're going to have consequences, but everybody just knows what to do. That's the way it works in journalism as well. That's why it's hurting. Mentality is very easily communicated, very subtle things, and so

you don't have to actually have an order. So within mainstream media, even within the mainstream alternative media like in Force, that's the way it works. You know that. Sometimes I take you aside and say you better shut up about Steve A. Chenniko are going to fire you. But it doesn't always work that way. The Biden administration was supposedly innocent when the Fed's never explicitly spelled out the or else she pointed out. But that's really what it is.

It really is operating as organized crime. It really is threats intimidation, he says. Fifty years ago, philosopher Hannah Rent wrote the most essential political of all, the most essential political freedom, the right to unmanipulated factual information, without which all freedom of opinion becomes a cruel hoax. It says, the battle over federal censorship will determine whether Americans have more than a passing with political freedom. Well, that really is where the battle is. And other

people are writing about this as well. It's been there for five years, five and a half years, really, and that was when it was openly done and we knew who was behind it, But it was happening before that, and so it's the question, you, what is going to happen with any of this. Dianne Waldman of Real Clear Policy says government cannot become big brother Internet censorship must end. Anyone who lived through twenty twenty observed that some

messages received treatment online that stood and start contrast to other messages. Yeah, I noticed. I noticed. As I've said before, I said in twenty twenty one, I said, twenty twenty was the year the world became China. And just to prove that, just to validate that, YouTube censored me and you know, suspended me for doing exact showing and doing exactly what I said was happening, turning into Chinese authoritarian model. We'll be right back.

Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at apsradio dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show from the album as well. And thank you on rock fand thank you James, I appreciate the tip on there we've

had. Let's talk a little bit about the Scrooge mcguffins that are all over the place, the environmentalists that are doing things, and now with the Christmas time, these same people who've been gluing themselves to roads and other things, other damage nuisances like that, these people are now attacking Christmas trees in Germany, and they coordinated this to do this in seven cities at the same time.

It's a conspiracy, isn't it. Yeah. You know, when you start seeing things like this happening all at the same time, they clearly know there's an organization behind it. Why don't we use that same logic when it comes to the fact that we have all these different governments around the world locking everybody down at the same time and then saying in two months we're going to do this next step. Then they do it. And then they say, and now two months from today, we're going to do today. Now what

we told you, because this is an emergency. We told you we're going to do this two months ago. Now we're telling you we're going to do something else in two months. And they all do it at the same time, just like these people spraying the Christmas tree. This is what it looked like at one of this. It's a beautiful tree in a town area I think it is a town or maybe it's in a mall, I think,

and they're spraying red paint all over it. I wonder what the environmental effect of that is going to do. Are they're releasing CO two as they spray that down. Radical climate activists, as Breitbart calls in, But actually I think they're I think they're climate crazies is a better way to describe them. Launch day series of coordinated strikes against public Christmas trees throughout Germany yesterday morning.

Do what they have against Christmas trees? Are they? Now? The source of CO two is Bill Gates says, we got to these things have been cut so and now we got to bury them or they're going to start emitting CO two and that type of thing. Now, this group is called the Last Generation. They're one of several of these. There's the Last Generation,

there's the Extinction Rebellion. There is another one called just Stop Oil. These are the people who are going around and trying to just destroy things that are beautiful things that are part of our culture, going in and you know, throwing food or paint or things like that on paintings to try to destroy them. Going into the louver other places. They threw paint on a Monet painting.

We saw this, So you know they have as they point out on this Bipart article, you know, as they glue themselves to the roads. People who have an emergency, can't get to the doctor. And we've already had a woman who has left brain dead because the radicals blocked the road in Berlin. They couldn't get her to the hospital, so she was left brain dead. But these are these profits of doom that have been around for more than fifty years, and always their big problem is is that they have too

short a timeframe. You know, the world is going to end in ten years or whatever. We've seen generation after generation of lies and false prophecies from these people. But of course in this particular case, there's seven of these things happened, seven incidents like that. There were no arrests made, no arrests. These people get away with it. It's almost like the government wants it to happen. We're all racing full speed toward catastrophe and our governments are

failing miserably to pull the emergency brake. No, what they're failing to do is to shut down these organizations. We know who's behind them. They've got big money in goos behind them, and they never punish them. And so this continues to go on. And then there was an article out of the UK about the eco zelotry coming after the Christmas chocolates. Yeah, nuts coming

after the chocolates. Actually, in this particular case, what this is an example of is the other extreme of this, the corporate side, the black rock esg type of thing, and how they want to virtue signal to the

government and maybe even to their customers. And so this writer for The Daily Skeptic, Joanna Gray, was talking about what they were able to buy a few years ago a box of chocolates and said it was amazing because they were handmade, a thing of beauty, handcrafted chocolate delights, and you could see all of them had a clear plastic cover on these chocolates. And so said, well, this year we thought we would pick up some of these.

We liked them so much, you know, they tasted great, but they were truly amazing to look at, and so we thought we'd get them as gifts or some family members. And we go back to where we got them at the department store Fortnham and Mason in the UK. So they weren't there. We couldn't find them anywhere, no boxes of these chocolates like they used to have, And they started asking people. I said, it was incredibly

packed. Everybody was shopping but they finally got an answer. One person who was selling a different type of candy, Mars and pan fruits, said, well, yeah, they're over there. They're in cardboard boxes now because we don't want to have any plastic and you know, they made an exception for us this year because we're a small company, but by next year we've got to have no plastic covers either. And so they went over and looked at it and said, it was just this nondescript, solid cardboard box. And

who knew what was inside. You couldn't see inside of it. I mean it's sealed up, you know, because you're in the store. You haven't bought it yet. They want people opening these things up, so said, no tiny caramel hearts, iced onto chocolate pots, no white and pink raspberry delights, no lightly dusted balls or truffles, just a bland cardboard box.

So they said, you know this is done to virtue signal. I said, of course, Fortenham and Mason doesn't really care about the planet, doesn't care about overuse of resources, because if it did, it would shut down immediately, because there's nothing in this department store that is essential. It is all luxurious flummery it is just trying to make a futile, pointless gesture. And so she said, well, I recommend anybody with any sense avoid this.

If you're in the UK, you can go to Chocolate Craft in Hampshire where the plastic lids show the beautiful chocolates and all their tempting glory. Yeah, this is just more corporate virtue signaling. And so you have the useful

at stormtroopers at the bottom destroying everything everywhere. But then you also have the corporations that are trying to destroy everything, and they don't care what customers want because they have one customer they want to serve, and that is the government, and the government wants to push this climate MacGuffin, And so these idiots are analyzing art and decorations. These are the people trying to destroy our society

though, and you need to take them very seriously. I know they're just staring pain on a Christmas tree, but they really want to destroy everything about our society. As we've seen. They want to come after our food, they want to come after our everything that we have. It's not just candy packages and Christmas trees. These people are deadly serious with all this stuff.

Well, we're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back and we're going to take a look at some of the other climate stuff. Especially. You will not believe what they are doing with windmills and Scotland. It's one of the most absurd things I have ever seen. In hypocritical as well. If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Heuey Lewis in the news, they say the You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen now at APS radio dot com. You're listening

to the David Night Show. Like a circle and a spy, like a wheel within a wheel, never ending in the beginning, a never spinning greed, like a snowball down a mountain, or a carnival like a cat snow It's turn out running rings around the lone. Yeah, it's a windpower grades and sweeping a minute slide of space and the world does like an apple whirling silently in space, like the circles that you find in the wind. Yeah, let's talk about the windmills of their mind, the windmills of the Green

Party and the Socialist Party in Scotland. It turns out, and this is one of the most interesting stories. I think it turns out that their wind turbines are secretly using generators, diesel generators. Now, diesel generators are fine. I don't have a problem with diesel generators, but they are not typically because they're for temporary use and things that they don't have a lot of emission

controls in them. And we a few years ago when Portia started coming out with their electric cars, Elon Musk had to show that his could compete on the Nurburg Green and so he sent one of his plaid cars over and of course he could not use the chargers that were over there because they've all got these different connections and everything. So he set up a charger and then his charger with a diesel generator so they could show all this electric car. He's

got a diesel generator. And the people around there said, this thing is smelly, it's noisy, it's running all the time. Stop this. But this is what Scotland is doing with their wind turbines. What a crazy grift this is Because you know, if the wind is not blowing, they still got to generate some electricity and so they fire up the diesel generators. Scotland's power sector criticized after it revealed dozens of giant turbines have been using diesel generators.

A whistle blower said the windmills are only turning thanks to hydrocarbon fuels diesel. They've got these things running up to six hours a day. The diesel is running because you know, the wind doesn't blow all the time, and that's one of the reasons why this is a problem. Scottish labor member said using diesel to de ice faulty turbines is an environmental madness. See that was

in Texas. They weren't expecting the windmills to freeze up. They did caused massive power outages because they have rewarded so many of these billionaires by building a power structure. They spent billions of dollars to build an infrastructure to pipe back the electricity generated in these remote wind farms. But then when we got cold weather they froze up. So perhaps they're running these things for six hours a day to de ice them. But this person, Colin Smith, said it

is environmental madness. This is one of the people who actually believed the climate fairytale. It's very difficult when you get disillusioned isn't it. Wait until he hears about Santa Claus. It's certainly going to be difficult for Colin. The Scottish National Party, the Green Party, they're being condemned for dishonesty and they found out that well they were. They had originally told everybody that Scotland possessed

twenty five percent of Europe's wind energy potential. Well that's not true. This revelation has found that sixty turbines at one wind farm in Scotland and eleven at another one were connected to six huge diesel generators last month. The Scottish Energy and Climate Changed Directorate they call it a directorate, right, because we're talking

about becoming authoritarian communist countries here. They responded to a Freedom of Information Act request asking how many wind farms use diesel generators as backup and how many do not? You see, they're not just using it to de ice these things. They're using it as backup. And that's the way renewable sources of energy

have always been used asap because they're not dependable. You know, the sun doesn't shine twenty four hours a day in case she hadn't noticed, But the wind doesn't always blow either so their response said, the Scottish government does not specifically gather information on whether wind farms use diesel generators as backup. So they asked another question. Because it's being a little bit cagy, it's like trying to talk to chat GPT or a smart bomb. We are aware they said

that one wind farm does have permission to use diesel generators. Oh so they want to say, well, we don't know if they're using it or not. But they were asked permission. And these people didn't say, wait a minute, you're creating this super clean environmental thing, what do you need a diesel generator for. They were in on this thing from the very beginning. They're in on this fraud, the Scottish National Party and the Green Party.

We're also aware from recent official level engagement with Scottish Power Renewables that these two wind farms use diesel generators as backups. As they kept asking them questions, they like peeling off the layers of an onion, they start to get to the core of the truth. Huge dirty generators. This is the same thing

said all the time when you look at the Paris climate acord. China is allowed to build as many coal power plants or whatever they want to burn, and there's no restrictions on emissions none whatsoever, no emission on the quantity, no restrictions on the quantity of these things, and no restrictions on the quality of the quality of the air that the emissions that come out of them. And so same thing is happening nowt here evidently, and with a wind power

they secretly put in diesel generators to make that up. Now, if they're getting a massive subsidy, they're using these things as a backup. And so they're also applying now and this is not just something that was done once. They now have twenty onshore wind projects and all these documents as they continue to look at the information, get the information back. All these mentioned having diesel

generators to use as a backup. So they won't let you use coal plants or oil plants or natural gas or something like that that's had a lot of emission controls put on it that is very very clean. You can't use that as a backup. No, we're going to shut those things down and then

bring out some dirty temporary diesel generators that'll be fine. What fraud and the other thing that's fraudulent about this is that they're getting all of this subsidy pretending that it's being generated by wind when it's really generated by these diesel generators. What a sham, What incredible sham. Oh yeah, I got these diesel gener but I guess what, you know, a quarter at the time,

I'm going to be running these diesel generators. But pay me, and you know, give me subsidies, green subsidies, all this other kind of stuff. I got a dirty diesel generator here, and you're gonna pay me as if I've got some emission free green power source. By the way, I just wondered, while we're talking about this, we've always talked about that eleven years ago. I'm sorry, twelve years ago. It was twenty eleven. It's twelve years ago. This is what I was doing when they started making

these renewable energy mandates. One of the first places where they had the mandates was in Colorado. You know, the same people I talked about yesterday putting wolves out, And so I was with a group that was trying to stop that. We did a lawsuit, just like we did a lawsuit trying to get Michael Mann to turn over his data that was fraudulent. We knew it was fraudulent, and he hit it. He was able to keep that. You know, we lost in court. He was able to keep it secret.

We lost in terms of fighting this. But this is a real problem, and at this point in time, we were talking about the fact that they bring on these renewables which are not steady state, and they're not reliable, and so you have to have something there to run. We're putting wind

on trial because people don't understand the facts behind wind. We believe that if people knew how variable wind was and how dirty it was, if they knew the wind is neither free nor clean, then they may not have government demands its use. Wind energy is very variable. When the wind blows, you're in good shape. But on a second by second basis, the wind energy

goes up and down. Because electricity must balance a demand and supply, any changes in the supply have to be taken up by some other supply, typically fossil fuel. So you've got a fossil fuel plan. It is running up and down, much like a car in traffic in the city that's inefficient. It uses more fuel and it needs to which causes more pollution. And it burns dirtier, which causes more pollution, and the pollution control equipment doesn't work

as well, which causes more pollution. So just trying to keep the energy balanced on the grid when wind is there causes the pollution. And if you took wind off the grid and just use the fossil fuel plant the way it was intended to be used, it would be like a car on the highway driving in a steady stream. That would cause less pollution than if it goes on the grid. Now the question comes up, how do we know that it's dirtier? And as variety of studies have been done, one of the

ones we're relying on in our Colorado lawsuit is the Bentech study. They examined with great care how much pollution comes out under different wind and fossil fuel scenarios that studies available on the web, and it's a very good study that no one has ever refumed. Market system, the marketplace should be able to pick the winners, not the government. Because wind is not the good deal that people say, because it costs more, because it comes out of the pocketbooks

of Americans who can't afford more. We believe it's time to go wind on trial. We took this lawsuit because we're a pro environmental organization. We have found, as have others, that use of renewable energies can cause more pollution than it prevents, and it's also in constitutional. So we take in this case to try to fix the problems, both a legal problem and an environmental

problem. Yeah. So the wind energy in these other things cause more environmental damage, and you've got to have that energy somehow, and if you can't get it from the wind, well then you've got to ramp up your power plant. But if you killed the power plant, it's bring out a dirty temporary diesel generator. That's where they are now. Yeah, that was twelve years ago. So why isn't Big oil losing any sleep over this new climate

deal? As they point out, this is CNN wringing its hands and saying, oh, we said we're going to get rid of fossil fuels, but it's exploding. They're doing more development and more discovery. Of course, not going to be able. We're not going to be allowed to refine that stuff in the United States because they're not allowed to have any more refineries built here.

They'll ship it to China. Because they'll manufacture the refined petroleum products, and then they'll also manufacture whatever we need because we're going to export all of that. And then the real issue, as I said, with COP twenty eight, we exported our energy usage, which is necessary for manufacturing and our manufacturing, we exported that offshore to China. Now what they want to do with COP twenty eight is we want to come after the wealth of the Western

nations and turn it over to people in China. I'm sorry, not China, but in Africa as climate reparations. That's what they're going to call it, and it's a big drifting operation. They're going to have these people going to The people who are going to get the money are going to be all the governments are going to send our money to Africa, and then the African dictators are going to buy stuff from these Davos billionaires after they've skimmed a lot

of money off of it. But we'll be the ones who get the bill, just as always. But anyway, following marathon talks, says CNN, the COP twenty eight Climate summit in Dubai struck a deal that makes an unprecedented call for quote transitioning away from fossil fuels. Some countries, like the US, welcome the firmer than ever commitment to moving away from energy resources to that

are responsible for planet heating emissions. Again, this is CNN it spewing this nonsense, but the resolution is marred by loopholes that offer the fossil fuel industry numerous escape routes. US oil production is at a record high. India plans to double their coal output by twenty thirty. Twenty thirty, isn't that when we're supposed to have everything super clean and under surveillance. The UK is issuing new drilling licenses in the North Sea. American oil majors are splurging billions on

deals that signal that they see robust demand for decades to come. You see all this stuff as virtual virtue signaling, and it is all stuff that is going to be used. These people are going to make their money. They're going to make their money from oil, coal, other things like that coming out of other countries, not out of ours necessarily, but they are also these agendas are going to be used to impoverish and to enslave us. That's

what it's really about. They're still going to make their money. They're going to make their money getting government subsidies for these renewable things or getting being able to do business as usual. The latest evidence as you look at Exxon October announcement of a sixty billion dollar deal to shale driller Chevron has an agreement two weeks after that that was done in October later to buy shale producer Hess for fifty three billion dollars. Hess has large oil assets in Guyana, which is

where Venezuela is talking about invading. They said it will help to grow their production over the next decade or so. Occidental Petroleum said it would pay twelve billion dollars in cash and stock to buy a US shale oil producer. So all together you've got three deals here there are about one hundred and twenty five billion dollars. And then if you look at Australia, another fifty billion oil

and gas deal was going to happen there also involving liquid natural gas. So the response from a person who wrote a book on ESG tells CNN, the markets aren't functioning properly now, Actually the markets are functioning properly. What they say, the market aren't functioning properly because they're not rewarding the right companies. So we need to have more government intervention. That's what these people always push. We need to make sure that the markets reward those wall companies that are

decarbonizing at pace now. They don't want any market input. They want to have the government be the marketplace. Again, when you look at ESG, they got one customer, and so I guess you could say in that sense, the markets are not functioning properly. We're not giving our one customer. The government's exactly what they want, and so the government, the marketplace,

which is the marketplace, has to send some more signals. So instead of the government marketplace rewarding these people, maybe you need to bring them in and punish them for giving other people what they want. The industry invested only twenty billion dollars in clean energy projects last year, only about two and a half percent of its total capital spinning. I guess you know they've got to invest a lot of money those diesel generators. For the fraud that they are doing

with these windmills. Goldman Sachs is on a shutdown. It's climate etf. They created an investment property that is essentially companies that are going to be trying to enforce the Paris Climate Accord, And, as zero Hedge says, another day, another ESG pipe dream falling victim to reality. Green investing an ESG is a grift, It certainly is. Goldman Sachs had a Paris Aligned Climate

US Large Cap Equity ETF. The idea was to provide investment results that corresponded to the performance of Goldman Sachs Equity index following the Paris Aligned Capital investment. So they're shutting this thing down. They only had seven million dollars go into it. I think the market is speaking, isn't it. Everybody knows that this is a forced, coerced fraud, and a lot of these people don't

want to put money into it anymore. Less than a week before that, we noted that thirty billion dollars has been shaved off the value of clean energy stocks over the last six months. Zarah Hedge also pointed out weeks ago how the ESG grift was reaching end game after Marcus Mueller, chief investment officer for ESG at Deutsche Bank, stated that sustainability fund should include traditional energy stocks. Well, it is kind of interesting, you know, some of these biggest

supporters of these things are backing off, just like Ford. Oh you know, this EV thing is not really working rural France. Meanwhile, the farmers there are so upset about the flip flopping that it's constantly going on that they're

flip flopping signs there. Look at this, they're taking street signs and they're turning them upside down, carefully unscrewing them, turning them upside down, and then screwing them back on that way and again it's a way of showing that they're under distress, in the same way that you would fly a flag upside down to show distress. Motorists in rural France have recently been astonished to see

thousands of road signs that entrances to towns and villages turned upside down. The name bearing roadside plaques have been unscrewed, flipped, then screwed back on. And I think it's a good protest. It's not destructive of anything. Get your message across. I think that's a great idea. Frankly, it began with a protests in southern turn in November. Now it's spread all over the country. The farmers are saying we were trying to think of a way of

denouncing all the contradictory instructions that we keep getting. If someone tells us to do one thing one day and then the opposite the next, we say that we're walking on our heads. In France, and so that's where this idea came from. We talk about flip flopping, they talk about walking on their heads. But either one works with this, and this is a lot of environmental nonsense. It is also the government says, well, we want to have local farms, we want to support local farms, but you know,

do this, do that. We're going to increase the cost of diesel fuel for the farm, but we still want you to produce this food, want you to do at a cheaper price. We want you to pay your laborers more money, and all the rest of these things, and say how we do all of that. They want us to raise the salaries to pay, but on the other end, we're told to lower our prices because of inflation. One of them tells us to change our practices. You can't do farming

the way that you're doing. You've got to do something that is more environmentally friendly or aligned with what Davos in the UN want, but then they tell us to produce as much as possible so that we can have food, sovereignty and independence. Well, this is all part of the chaos, you know. It's just like Fauci flip flopping on his mask. One day you wear it, one day you don't, then going to mandate it. Now we're going to mandate three of them and say, you know, all that type

of stuff, and so it is really part of creating chaos. That's really deliberate. You know, we talked about environmentalism. We've got Gates. You know, first of all, let's pay the billionaires to plant trees and or they can you know, pay each other whatever, and then they can do whatever they want. So you pay these carbon credits for people to plant trees because they've got to take the CO two out. Now they flip flop, and now Gates says, no, we're not crazy. Were there the crazy

people here? After you paid me to plant the trees, now you're going to pay me to cut them down and bury them. And so it's constantly this flip flopping, and the purpose is to turn everything upside down because it's faut you said, we got to do it from the inside. We've got to create chaos and disruption, and we do it step by step. And this way all these mcguffins work, whether it's their health mcguffin or their climate

mcguffin. So they said their campaign is help to get the government to back off of a couple of two new taxes that they were talking about doing. So that's what's happening with the farmers. And then when you look at Italy, a positive sign there the parliament has banned artificial food derived from animal cells. And this is happening as the UK stores are banning plastic to virtue signal. At least Italy, the parliament there is banning tumor meat. That's what

I call it, tumor meat. We're going to cultivate these cells in a lab and feed them to you. So according to Reuters, according to Reuters, they said that what an outlaws or cell cultures or tissue that are grown into meat get people will get up to one hundred and sixty seven dollars fine, they might have their government funding with drawn. Here in the United States, that would be the big thing. Let's stop funding these corporations that are

working against us. That would be a job for the Republicans who have the majority in the House, because that's where they can stop the spending bills or to be shut down completely. And so here in the United States, this is not happening. Instead, you got Bill Gates and got Tyson coming together talk about how they're gonna have lab grown chicken and they're going to grow bugs for us. The United States is only the second country in the world to

approve sell based chicken. The other one is Singapore, which approved it back in twenty twenty. It's a very expensive process. I don't know that it's necessarily makes any sense from an economic or an energy standpoint, But who cares about that. We'll have a cyber truck that weighs seven thousand pounds. Who cares about the energy efficiency of that. The costly process involves extracting stem cells and giving them a nutrient dense bath in vitamins, minerals, salt, and

even soy inside a steel bioreactor. An average batch takes about two weeks to harvest. But they said in Italy, the agricultural minister, whose name is Lola brigida I said lab products, in our opinion, do not guarantee quality or well being. In other words, they're not safe and effective. We don't like these things, and we're trying to protect our culture and our tradition and we want good quality stuff. So good for them, but that's not

what we have in the United States. We're not doing that at all. Okay, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. When we come back. We're going to talk a little bit about what is happening with the election. Oh, I'm sorry. When we come back, we're going to be talking to Tony and Tony Hartban and so we'll make a quick break here and we'll be right back with Tony. Stay with us, Elvis the Beetle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the

Oldies channel at APS radio dot com. Do think you're listening to the David Knight Show and joining us now is Tony Ardaban of Wise Wolf Gold. There's been a lot of development in the financial markets. I want to talk to Tony about that. Thank you for joining us, Tony. That's good to see you, David, thanks for having me. Thank you. Yeah, what do you think about this? You've got the Powell pivot? Was it

really a surprise? Did they baked this up. We had a stock market jumped up on it, but we already had some people who said, well, you know, we think they're gonna lower interest rates earlier than we originally thought. But everybody knows they're going to lower it because of the election stuff. But how has that affected gold? Well, you know, you have a lot of the fake paper markets, and it's it's I think it's helping drive the price right now, especially in those those sectors. But that's really

not what the issue with gold is right now. And it's funny. I was looking at the headlines like Santa palell is driving the markets and happy days are here again. It reminded me of something. You know, he used the word transitory him and Janet Yellen is about it was transitory. It was transitory, and then he became very hawkish and then he raised rates faster than any rate in history. But I liked what they described now as the rate

that they're holding. They called it the terminal rate, and I thought, terminal really describes it better, doesn't it. It's a terminal rate now, David. And so they've decided they're going to raise rates or lower rates three times starting in twenty twenty four and perhaps into twenty twenty five another four times. That's what they say, and really they don't have a lot of choice. If you're going to prop up the domestic economy, you're going to have

to goose it with cheap fiat currency debt. That's what it loves it. It survives off of that. So I think that's the plan right now. You're so right. It's an election year that has nothing to do with sound economics or actually saving the dollar or anything like that. I think you're just watching this play out where they're hand in glove with the federal government in the

sitting administration. This is the deal. Yeah, and if they can do moves that are going to cause the stock market to pick up and everybody looks at their portfolio value going up, well I'm happy with this, you know. So yeah, it's funny they call him Santa Pale. I saw a cartoon of somebody had Klaus Schwab and had a a person setting on his knee, and they called it it Santa Klaus. And he says to the person who says, you'll get nothing and you'll be happy. Basically, what Santa

Klaus is the grinch who stole everything from us. Yeah, zero Hedge has got a thing quoting Powell, and they call it the Powell pivot. They said, so on December the first, he said this, he said it'd be premature to speculate on when policy might ease. Then on December the thirteenth, he said, rate cuts are something that begins to come into view and clearly is the topic of discussion. So I guess there's been a lot of economic change or political change, is it? Bro is what we're looking at

there right, Well, it's very malleable. It's transitory, David All policy is transitory, but I think it's I think a terminal better describes it, because what you're watching is the collapse of a system. And you know, it's funny to watch the commentators and everything across the Twitter sphere or the x sphere or whatever it is. Now we'll get into a couple of tweets here in a little while. There's so much faith in the fake stock market.

It's really unbelievable, especially when you realize, you know, you have so much of the popular culture is looking at inflation now because it's just it's so evident. I mean, yeah, you know, it's gradually over your lifetime, things start to increase in price, and you kind of get used to that because you hear your parents talk about, oh, it used to you know, it costs a dime a gallon for gasoline, and all you know, I can go to the movies for a nickel. You hear all that

stuff. Well, I think even with the memes like Home Alone, where the prices increase two hundred and forty seven percent and people are taking notice of that, Well, what's interesting to have the side by side of thinking is that on one hand you have culture realizing inflation is real, that the dollar is fake, and on the other hand they say, well, I think

we have a soft landing. I think everything's going to be fine. Now, Well, if the trend is always to lose, the dollar loses value, then how can you have any faith in that system where you're investing. It's it's rigged against you. The mere fact that you're dealing in something that

constantly loses value isn't and of itself theft. So it's funny, David was, I was just doing some calculations before that we did the show, and I have this two and a half dollar gold Indian Okay, this is I know you can't see it right, I'm holding up to the camera, but it's it's about the size of a dime. This was two and a half dollars prior to nineteen thirty three. I did the math on it, just the meltible gold value, not just the coin value. Two hundred and forty

seven dollars today. Wow. Wow, two and a half dollars, two hundred and forty seven dollars in meltable gold. Yeah. Yeah, if you want to see a side by side comparison of what happened to the dollar, that's a great example. Yeah, that's where we are now, and you know, ten years, twenty years from now, it's going to be even further away. So really, I think you're watching two separate things happen.

The old system and people are still running back to it because they have the familiarity with it and normalcy bias very dangerous because on the horizon you've got a complete reshuffling, I believe of the global currency system. Central banks are buying gold at a record pace. We talk about that all the time. I think that's really what's behind the gold price. You'll have these fluctuations and you'll

have some profit taking, but we're on a trend. This is not the last part of a bull market, or this is something totally different in my opinion, and I'm not This isn't this isn't about investment. This is about watching history happen. And as a matter of fact, I was listening to a couple of different podcasts and I got on Robert Kiyosaki's Twitter and I was thinking, this is what I'm watching, especially with some of the gold analysis.

This is like the Twilight Zone when he says in the opening, there's a signpost on the road ahead. We're watching the signposts the outer limits where we control the vertical, we control the horsell. We are completely in control of everything, and we're going to manipulate it, and we'll have our media come in. I'm looking at this headline who says this is from the hill.

FED keeps rates at a twenty two year high as inflation retreats. Yeah, I guess all the inflation retreated between December the first and December the thirteenth, Right, they it all just went away, So we can completely change it. And it has nothing to do with an election year, right, nothing, nothing, whatsoever it's very malleable, very transitory. Actually it's terminal, and I think this is what we're going to keep watch. This is going to be ugly. I had somebody comment on my ex and I get

so, I don't know what I'm supposed to call the thing anymore. It's Twitter, you know. Somebody at mentioned means and off of one of our interviews, and they was talking about, you know, gold is manipulated and you don't talk enough about BTC. And it wasn't a it was a friendly tweet, and I said, well, actually I love BTC, but there's gonna be a revaluation soon. I don't know when it's I mean not tomorrow or next week or this year, but it's coming and it's going to be

ugly. It's not going to be a pretty thing, you know, because you have year, decades of manipulation behind the gold price versus the dollar. And it's funny. I want to there's a tweet up on gold Telegraph. I don't have anything to do with this account, but I find it interesting and it's it's pretty on point. You can find him on X and he asked, why doesn't let me find the tweet? It is talking about Jerome Powell, and it asked him why isn't A journalist asked Jerome Palell why central

banks are buying gold. He says, it's just a pet rock, right, because the Central Bank of the United States, in the Federal Reserve is not buying gold. This is a I think this is a huge tell of what's happening in the world and where we're headed. And again, almost no major financial network is talking about it. I think it's talk about is the Sherlock Holmes that the dog that didn't bark? Why aren't you talking? Why are we focusing so much on these rate cuts? You know? It really

is, it really is amazing, David. I mean, we're watching history happen and there's just so there's a niche group of people that are an analysts that are looking at this and wow, I just I get goosebumps thinking about it. We're really watching and this is happening faster than I haven't even anticipated. Because you know, you and I we talked about about them lowering rates. We didn't see it possibly till getting closer to the election summertime twenty twenty

four. No, they're already doing it because I think there's so many economic indicators that aren't talked about, like the Misis Institute talking about the contraction of the actual money supply contracting faster since anytime since the Great Depression. Those are indicators of an economy that's dying. And you have hundreds, hundreds of zombie corporations that are left over, not only from two thousand and eight, but

from the scandemic from they're propped up. You know, you were just you were just hinting and talking about ESG and environmental social governance and how that all of those those policies are linked to the Federal Reserve and the Central Bank, that those relationships are what keep these zombie corporations life. You have, so you have possibly hundreds of systemic failures that could be going on simultaneously in the economy if the dollar loses its grip anywhere, and so it's not good.

I wouldn't be I wouldn't find this a Christmas rally, h I would. I would. I would think of it as a good time to exit in my opinion. Yeah, you know, you look at the establishment press, like I said, the Hill of Washington posts. Oh yeah, we've we've beaten inflation, now it's like, are you serious, and we talk about that that policy of gradual inflation, which is now accelerated significantly. You held out that coin. When was that You said it was from the nineteen thirties.

That coin, it's a it's a nineteen oh nine nineteen. I wish we had a better camera. It's a nineteen nine two and a half dollar gold Indian. So that's the creation of the Federal Reserve. And what the Federal Reserve has done is get rid of ninety nine percent of value of the dollar. It's not a way for us. It keeps people from being able to really accumulate wealth, and because they are anxious to be able to pay this back, to monetize the debt by saying, well, with inflation,

we can pay it back with cheaper dollars. But they don't even have to worry about that. As long as they've got this fiat currency, they can just keep printing. And so when you tell people don't worry, the Federal Reserve is going to rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic, and you know, everybody just parties on and so you see the Drudge Report, there's a big champagne glass up at the top. Let's party on. It's like it's

nineteen ninety nine. There's absolutely no concern about these people going to bring down inflation without triggering a recession, says Washington Post. Well, good luck with I hope that's true. But my concern again is, you know, when you look at the long term value, you look at what the goal does hold its value long term. But the other thing about it is that we've got to get out of the dollar system because the CBDC. Now you mentioned

bitcoin. I've talked earlier this week about how focused they are on bitcoin, and in terms of manipulating markets. They can manipulate and they do the gold of silver market, but they also manipulate the bitcoin market as well. It's got a small market cap for these people, very easy for these people to come in and manipulate it, and they've got all kinds of tools at their

disposal. It could be anything that they're going to do. But Elizabeth Warren is flat out focused on getting rid of cryptocurrency, and she's got the Biden administration focused on that with her as well. And if we're not careful, they're going to come after cash. They'll come after anything that is outside of their dollar, and so it is important to push back against that. But it's also important to have a variety of things that are going to be something

that's going to keep you out of this system as they redesign it. And I like to physically have something in my possession because I'm just too concerned about what can be done, uh, with crypto and with manipulation. So well, you have Jamie demon test before Elizabeth Warren, and he's done this many

times. I do not trust this man. He goes out and he'll say something counter to bitcoin, something derogatory, he'll dismiss it, and then you find out later that his bank and you know, entities associated with JP Morgan are buying it. So he's dropping the price. And I don't know how much of that is built into his testimony, but it's pretty disgusting. And you know, you you talked about that, the argument, uh that a lot of crypto people say, well, actually it's the dollar and it's cash.

Yeah, so we should man that. You know, that's not the answer either. I totally totally get that. Yeah. There's another tweet from a gold Telegraph I thought was interesting. The Federal Reserve Force forecast three rate cuts next year as inflation is still way above the target of two percent. The economic machine is broken. It's starting to make sense why CBDCs are coming so fast. Yeah. See, this is the controlled demolition to bring in

the central bank digital currency, and they're going to go after bitcoin. I don't know how much damage they can do to bitcoin, but always look, this is a slide of hand. Whenever they're going to release something new into the ecosystem, whether it's a spot bitcoin, ETF or whatever. The Security Exchange Commission getting all the approvals for the mainline financial behemos to buy in, always watch for them to try to bring it down first. And I don't

know what that's what they're doing, but it makes sense to me. It's an old trick. They use it all the time to get their clients in and then they go out and they cheerlead for it. Bitcoin is it can be manipulated. It's actually harder to do than gold in my opinion, because of there it can't be any new bitcoin and put into the system. They do manipulate it, they do it through the public relations. They do it through like the testimony in front of Elizabeth Warren in my opinion, and I

don't know what that means. I do like bitcoin, we talk about it. There's a lot of I loved crypto. I like crypto technology, David, But again, there's so much volatility over there. I'm not telling anybody to go get into it. I think it's good to understand. But the reason that you and I talk every week is because we're not really talking about investments. We're talking about the overall historical implications of a dying dollar. We

don't want that. You and I don't want that to happen, because it's going to hurt people. But we're trying to get people that are listening and our tuning in that are aware that getting outside of the system is the answer. Having physical things that you trade that are outside of the banking system because the banking system is very volatile. I never tell people to close out their accounts, but you need to be aware that there's things that could happen in

this country, like bail ends, freeze in your account. There is a little known bit of history after the two thousand and eight two thousand and nine crash, the debacle where we had TARP funds. Just after that, David I watched This was on sixty minutes and it just didn't get a lot of

coverage. But you would have teams of people from the FDIC that would go in at night and take over a bank where the uniforms they would let everybody go and they would have the uniforms on they would take over the bank. Those banks were repatriated, basically nationalized by the FDIC, major banks all over the country, and they did this quietly as to not cause a banking panic.

This happened all over the They would secretly, so you would go and your bank would still be open, and you think you're talking, but there was all the tellers and everybody operating. There were FDIC employees. Wow,

wow, that's amazing. Well, you know, it is interesting because when we look at we look at Jamie demon and of course he's the CEO of JP Morgan, but he's acting exactly like the namesake of it, you know, like JP Moore himself, as he's manipulating these things and lying to people as people pointed out that oh okay, so uh crypto is for criminals. Is that why you've got your own coin? And as far as criminals, look at the billions of dollars that you've had to pay in criminal fines and

other things like that. But at the same time, when you look at the way JP Morgan his namesake, manipulate the financial system, got us Federal Reserve and everything, there's now this thing. I don't know if you this

is the first time I saw this, Tony. They started talking about this in July, the basil three in game regulations on the well, does that sound like that's something from the Bank of International Settlements, And yeah, it is, and it's under the guys Tony of saying we're going to take care of we've got to control these big banks because they're dangerous, right, and so we've got to have if you've got assets of one hundred billion dollars or

more, we're going to put some other capital, some additional capital requirements on you. And of course, the people who are pushing this new stuff. Daily Caller has got an article about it. The people who are pushing it are the people like Elizabeth Warren, JP Morgan, these other people. They keep saying, well, we've got to get these big banks under control,

and so we're going to create the Consumer Financial Protection Board. And yet what did that do that made it impossible for the small and medium sized banks to do business. That made it harder for small businesses to get loans and things like that. This is they call it indgame. That's what they call it, bazl three in game regulations and the endgame is I think they want to end small business and small banks because that's what this is going to do.

They're going to double the capital requirements for that, which means that they're going to go up in interest rates for everybody, and it's going to put some of these smaller banks out of business. So just arbitrarily raise the regulations and the capital requirements. Sorry, you don't meet that anymore. And that's the way they bring in the FDIC goons to shut them down. Well, it's just like to go back to history. The crash of nineteen oh seven was

orchestrated to help the public opinion turn towards a new central bank. Of course they didn't call it that. They had the meeting at Jackyl Island on November twenty second, nineteen ten. Funny thing about JP Morgan too, it is something I noticed. His life span. He was born in eighteen thirty seven. His lifespan was the exact amount of time that we didn't have a central bank. He died in nineteen thirteen, so it was from the year one

of not having a central bank. Andrew Jackson said, I killed the bank. He wanted that on his tombstone. He called him adena vipers and thieves and got rid of the bank. And we didn't have one from eighteen thirty seven to nineteen thirteen, and always a crisis was used to precipitate the will to do that. And they actually they had some real skullduggery setting that up too, David. I mean, I know your documentary. It's a wonderful

lie. It's coming up on that time of year again. I did it through on Christmas Eve actually December twenty coming into the twenty third, twenty fourth, when Congress went home. They used a lot of skull and they actually opposed it. Those who had written the bill, like Aldridge, opposed that sort of it's too strong, it's too regulatory. It's very very brilliant the way that they did that. And I think this is what you're more and

more consolidation. And if you study, you know, a conspiracy, if you want to call it that, If you want to study the conspiracy theory of history. It's all about consolidation. So it would make sense that the

Bank International Bank of Banks is the BIS. And as a matter of fact, a little known fact, the gold that was turned in in nineteen thirty three when Franklin Roosevelt said turn in your gold, you know, had the price of gold at twenty dollars an ounce and once he accumulated all that he figured he was going to get, they raised the price of thirty five dollars announce. Well, that gold went to Boso, Switzerland, to the Bank

of International Settlements. Yeah, they put in the seal train with Vladimir Lemon that they were waiting for it. I waited a few more years. Yeah, that's right. They had they had to fund communism, that's true. Yeah, it truly is amazing. You know what it really is a den of vipers and thieves. And Andrew Jackson was right about that, wasn't he. And it is amazing. You know. David Stockman when I talked to him, and he's written subsequent articles about this as well, the destruction of

the American middle class. If you divided it out, we just had a congressman say, well, you know it's a It divides out to one hundred thousand dollars debt per American that we've got out here, and he says, when you look at the fact that you had this massive quantitative easing, the lowering of interest rates and all the rest of this stuff, and look at how that transferred money to the upper smallest percentage, the one percent or the

one percent of the one percent, the zero point one percent, and how much wealth they gained at the expense of other people because they're in the stock market. It's one of the reasons I guess that Trump and Biden constantly talk about the stock market. That is their metric for success. That's a big part of the wealth transfer when they pump that up. But as he's pointing

out, this is destroying the middle class. And it's not just the quantitative easing and the interest rates and other things like that, but it was also

the Trump trillions that were put in there with the COVID stuff. That's what David Stockman talked about when he came on here talking about that, and he's got a book coming out in January talking about how, you know, Trump disrupted the economy and he calls it the war on capitalism, and it truly was a war on capitalism because you're not even going to really be a good thing for the economy. Even through the stock market, it's just a temporary

sugar high. What they're doing is by laying this kind of debt across society, they really are enslaving us and taking away everything out of the society. And so this is something that's going to continue. And we've seen with all of the debt policies, we've seen how gold is kind of hung in there. But again, the thing I keep coming back to is the letely restructure the financial system and to you know, to completely restructure that with CBDC.

So my instinct is to hang on to something that is physical and traditional and that has really been there for a long time. Talk a little bit about silver. You know, everybody keeps talking about how silver is down at such a small ratio. Has there been any move in silver recent layer any indication of a silver changing. We saw some we saw a bitcoin go up, we saw gold go up in response to this news and interest rates who are

going to go down because everybody saw that as being inflationary. What about silver is that moved at all? Not like it should. Yeah, I mean looking at goldprice dot Org right now, and so I can keep the spot prices rotating twenty four dollars and seventeen cents, So twenty four seventeen Luciferian bankster notes make one Detroit ounce of silver on the spot the global spot price.

That is cheap and historically had to get my calculator out, but I think we're probably like eight It takes like eighties seven or so ounces of silver to make one ounce of gold, and all throughout human history that number has been completely different. So even going back to ancient Rome and the Egyptians, it's usually ten to fifteen to maybe sometimes twenty to one at the most. And

only in our era where you have maybe error. Only in our error, when we have central banking and the markets are so skewed and value so skewed and we really don't know what houses any value, do you jump to crazy numbers like eighty seven ounces of silver to make one ounce of gold. That makes no sense. I mean, even geologically, David, it takes us seventeen ounces of silver for every one ounce of gold estimated in the ground, So why would you have in the third dimension like right, you know,

developed mind and process, How can it be eighty seven? During the crash and scandemic beginning of a first quarter of twenty twenty, it was one hundred and twenty five ounces to one ounce of gold. So it doesn't make any sense when you have you know, I was one years old and it was a fifty dollars an ounce. Not again, Wow, almost forty four years ago, Wow it was it was fifty dollars an ounce. That makes no sense, knowing what we know about the debasement of the dollar. The debt

of the US at the time was less than a trillion. We're at thirty three point five trillion and climbing rapidly. We have one hundred and thirty percent debt to GDP ratio. Why is silver so cheap? These are open, especially when it's the most thermoconductive metal. I'm a cheerleader or silver, not even as an investment, but just look how crazy that number is. It's so cheap right now, but you still won't find mainstream analysts talking about it

because there's something wrong with it. And I do know that. You talk about Jamie Demon who's the largest holder of silver in the world, it's JP Morgan. He's waiting for something to happen, isn't me Well, and they're accumulating the physical. Yeah that's right. Yeah, that's interesting. I guess maybe we should start looking at what he accumulates rather than looking at what Nancy

Pelosi has been a good bell weather her husband, his portfolio. You know, if you mirrored him in the stock market, you'd do pretty well. But exactly he's hammered away at it. So yeah, maybe it's a JP Morgan that you need to look at. Tell us a little bit about what is happening as we run up into Christmas. We talked a little bit about it last week. When you're on you've got some commemorative things there perhaps and some other gifts are what could what kind of gift ideas do you have at

wisewolf dot goal. Well, we definitely anything that you need for gold and silver a week you can buy direct through Davidnight dot Gold. But we also have our membership program and as little as thirty five dollars a month or just one time purchase, you can get Wolf cub and that's for kids. And Melissa put together a great newsletter actually, and the team helped to. We have a newsletter for wolf Cub and it tells a story. It has some

crossword puzzles. Yours truly did the questions for the crosswords, like fiat is you know fake? You can look that up. Don't want to ruin the crossward, but you could. And it's good for it's fun for kids.

And we're going to be putting next year. I got a lot of attention I'm going to pay to the wolf Cub for you know, just history, different types of coins, even stuff like you know the Indian had pennies and things that are neat you because those are still Copper is going to be in the news, I promise you next year, folks, all the precious metals will be the resources will be there, but we're focusing on gold and silver. Wolf Pack has so many great things happening right now. I'm going to

be putting in some Christmas rounds. I know those are already going out one ounce Christmas commemorative silver rounds and fractional coins. And we stayed ahead of the market. We bought some gold early, so we've still got supply on some of the fractional stuff. But the plan is and we're really thankful is to grow next year, continue to add members so we can buy collectively for everyone,

better deals and better supply. So that's my goal right now. I'm kind of floating back between Branson and North Texas with our two locations and just keeping the supply chain opens. It's not as easy as it may sound. There's not a lot of availability and product like there used to be when I

started this business. I imagine, so well, it's always great to talk to you, and again, David Knightdye Gold, Tony has set that up to take you to Wisewolf dot Gold and he's got some great programs there where you can do this gradually, where you can train kids with a wolf pack, and we can also get information because he's building a little community there.

You get information exchanging it with other people as well as gradually saving. But of course he can get you gold and silver in any quantity large or small, and that's one of the key things about that. Tony is always great talking to you, and again, nobody knows what the future is going to be, but we need to do what we can. I'm as I the older I get, the more conservative I get, because you know, when you're young. You make a lot of mistakes, don't you. So it's

uh. I've had experiences with some of the some of the more speculative investments. That's why I get more conservative as I get older. It is so good to talk to you. And again, David Night, I go old to take you to Tony and let him know that you came through us. Thank you so much. Tony appreciate it. Thank you, David appreciate Okay, folks are going to be right back here news now at apsradionews dot com or get the APS radio app and never miss another story. And now the

David Night Show. Well, I've got a couple of comments here on rock fan Wes Robertson says Ken Stars Vaudevillian shtick was a smoke screen behide the fact that Slick Willie was involved in the biggest tech transfer to China and US sistory. Yeah. Absolutely. I remember when Russill and Lindball used to have he had that guy that did parody songs, he did secret Asian man Johnny Wong and transferring all that stuff to China. Interesting that everybody knew that, Interesting

that nothing was ever done about that. You know again, Ken Starr is not going to do anything about it. They might impeach him, but they're not going to bring up the big issues like that. We see the same thing. We see history repeating itself now as well. On Rumble I Believe the Kid Part two, Hobby Lobby has black Santa Claus for sale to show that they're not racist. That's exactly right, yeah, Hobby Lobby. And of course, you know, as Megan Kelly told us, we all know

that Santa Claus is white. What else do we know for sure about Santa Claus. It's crazy, But anyway, And on rock Fan, Jason Parker, thank you very much for the tip. He says, your album is great. David, thank you for the beautiful music. Well, thank you

for the compliment. I really do appreciate it and for the tip. And by the way, folks, the album is at the David Knightshow dot com and if you go to the merchandise thing you'll see it is available as a digital download, So please tell your friends about it if you like it. We would appreciate that, especially as you come up in the Christmas season. Everybody has these are traditional songs, but we've got a little bit different take on it and reorchestrate it, reimagine that. So it's a little bit.

It kind of freshens up the classics that are there, and you know, we all listen to it's nice to have the nostalgic songs that you listen to, but it's also nice to hear them in a little bit different way. And as you listen to Christmas music, you may want to have something's going to freshen up a little bit and maybe it'll become a new tradition for you. Let's talk a little bit about what's going on with politics. We've got

Marjorie Taylor Green warns that Maga would revolt. That's what she says if if Haley is Nicky or Nuki. Haley has made the vice presidential candidate for the Trump ticket, and she says MAGA would revolt if Nicky Haley were to be even be given an internship and Trump's next administration. I don't understand why they didn't have any problem with all the cabinet picks that he had in the first place, But why are they so concerned about Nicki Haley. They're as vice

president. Trump already made Fauci president in twenty twenty. Did they not notice that? How many times have I said that Trump stepped down and made Fauci the president do what he says. He's going to determine everything that's going to happen. We're going to be ruled by bueracrats. I said that when we were running up to the election in twenty twenty, I said, why would

I care about the election? Trump turned us over to the bureaucracy, you know, being ruled by bureaucrats with Fauci as president, So why do I care about any of this stuff? But of course MAGA, which hated all that, hated the lockdown, hated the vaccine, hated the mask, all the rest of the stuff. Ohe but they loved Trump, but he made Fauci president. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he did the same thing

with Nicki Haley. Marjorie Taylor Green goes on to say she represents the neo Khon establishment of America, last wing of the Republican of the America, last wing of the Republican Party that we are absolutely done with. Well, I think she looks just like Trump's cabinet. As a matter of fact, Trump picked her, and I remember you know off Air, I said to Roger Stone, said, why in the world would Trump ever put Nicki Haley in for anything, put her in as UN ambassador. I said, this is

typical of what he has done with everybody in his cabinet. He put Neo Khon warmongers in generals all over the place. He put Goldman Sachs bankers in all over the place to run everything. He sold out to the Republican establishment, he sold out to the neocons, he sold out to the globalists at Davos, and everything he did in twenty twenty was a sellout to the globalists. But as all this is happening, he's having a lot of fun, and so are his supporters with the dick comments, people saying, oh he

wants to be a dictator or anything. Yeah, I'll be a dictator before day and all the rest of the stuff. So they love it. He's joking about it. The problem is, as I said, just like with Nikki Haley, oh he's going to make our vice president. He made Fauci present, He's going to be a dictator. Did you not notice what happened in twenty twenty, how they were dictating everything and of course they are clever about it, clever enough to say that we're not going to issue the orders

directly. We're going to make recommendations and suggestions, and then if you don't follow our recommendations and suggestions, we'll take that money away. It's kind of like what we were talking about before with social media. Well it's a nice social media company you got there. It'd be a shame if anything were to happen to it. And so they come in and say, well, that's a nice program you got funded by the federal government. It'd be a shame

if anything were to happen to it. That's the way they do this. And so Trump is in Iowa. He's very angry because the governor there, Kim Reynolds, has endorsed DeSantis, and so he's there at Israellies crashing her. What he says is, we love loyalty. We we I love how these politicians refer themselves as we we love loyalty. As a matter of fact, that's the only thing he cares about. When the oppositional mainstream press is looking at him, they say, well, look he's gonna he's going to

fill his cabinet with loyalists. And as I said the other day, I said, don't they all. I mean, they all do that, But nobody loves loyalty and demands loyalty more than Trump does. It's the only thing he cares about. And he says, we love loyalty, portrayed Reynolds as unfaithful to him, and he says she's the least popular governor in the country.

But I will be your ethanol champion. As I said, I went to a convention of think tanks when I was doing the kind of work that showed you earlier, and one of the things they had there, they said, we're going to have a party. It's going to be done as a speak easy and if you want to get in, you knock on the door

and we'll open up the little thing. And you say, I'm here for the ethanol subsidy, Well, maybe that needs to be prohibited, these ethanol subs everybody understands that it's a bad thing, but this is one of the things that the Republican Party they'd like to defeat at that troth for the climate stuff. Even the typical climate grifters and the Democrat Party don't even like the ethanol thing. But the farmers and Iowa like it. It's a payoff to

them. But when we talk about grifting, Trump's got a legal defense fund and it's raised not as much money as he would have liked to have raised. His defense fund has only raised one point six million dollars over the last six months. They've spent though, less than thirty thousand dollars, so they're

hanging on to the money. But almost all the money that they have spent has been on mar A Lago. Not that he's paying his mortgage, but I guess in no sense he is, because he's held some lavish parties at mar A Lago and Trump used the donated money from his legal defense fund to pay for these parties at mar A Lago. So in a sense, what he's doing is he's laundering the payments back to himself. No problem, right. A grifter is going to grift. That's what he's always That's what he

did with Save America. He made two hundred and fifty million dollars off of his supporters after the election, where he changed the rules for he made sure that it was going to be a mail in election, and he made two unred and fifty million dollars off of that Save America thing. I don't know how much money Alex Jones made off of Stop the Steal, but he made

two hundred fifty million dollars and so now he's up to it again. He raised one point six million dollars and he's paying for parties at mar A Lago. The group that put this together is a political nonprofit called the Patriot Legal Defense Fund, except they're not paying any defense legal expenses for the patriots. January sixth, I thought Trump loved loyalty. Is he loyal to those people whose pockets he picked, who he sent into a trap? Yeah, it's

the Democrats who laid the trap. He's the one who pushed the people into it. So the first periodic financial report they submitted to the IRS on Wednesday, so they only got one point six million in receipts, and about a million of that came from one group. One couple gave him a million dollars. There's somebody who has been connected with QAnon as well, and so I

got six hundred thousand dollars for receipts. But even though they haven't spent too much money, most of the money that they have spent again, they spent twenty eight thousand dollars, but eighteen thousand of that, the major already of it was to rent a banquet hall from Trump at mar a Lago back in

November. And so not a penny for the January six ers. And this Patriot Legal Defense funds, by the way, you know, so he takes in twenty eight thousand, he spends eighteen thousand on a party there that he pays himself for the party. Amazing. Yeah, let's have a party, and it's going to cost me eighteen thousand dollars and I'll take that money on my legal defense fund. And so you say, okay, So he spent ten thousand dollars on legal defense and eighteen thousand on a party at mar Lago.

No, he didn't send this spend a single penny on legal defense. I don't know what he spent the other ten thousand on. They don't say here, but the fund reported no legal expenses. The Legal Defense Fund did not spend a penny on legal defenses, but did spend nearly twenty thousand dollars on a party at mar Lago. And this is really again when you when you look at Trump and how obsessed he is with money, with loyalty,

with these other things. Had absolutely no loyalty to his co defendants in the Georgia thing, And even if he doesn't really like them, it wasn't a smart move to not give them any money at all for their defense fund. And he didn't give any money to Rudy Giuliani, he didn't give any money

to Jenna Ellis or any of the other people there. And so a lot of people have said that's that's not a good harbinger of what's going to happen, because if these people are left on their own defend for themselves with any money for their legal defense, they might just turn against him, which Jenna Ellis appears to have done. So. The million dollar donor was a foundation, a living trust. Court records show that it belongs to a couple.

His name is Borlan ardent supporters for q Andon, and because of that, the Trump campaign canceled a fundraiser back in October twenty twenty because at that point time they didn't want to be affiliated with q Andon. But now the Borlands are back and gave a million of the one point six million dollars in his defense fund to him, but again not paying a single penny for in legal expenses. The Supreme Court is agreeing to here a January the sixth case that

could affect Trump's prosecution. This is not something he's directly brought, but we've seen a lot of people who were charged with obstructing an official proceeding, looking at long jail sentences, and so several of these people have appealed to the Supreme Court, as they should. It's an injustice, it truly is. And so in one of these cases they have agreed to here, the one of Joseph Fischer seeking to dismissed a charge accusing him of obstructing an official proceeding.

If he wins or loses, either way, it's going to affect the others who have brought this up. Fisher, by the way, has a federal public defender because you know, he's got no money. He doesn't have a legal defense fund like Trump does. And again Trump loves loyalty, but only in one direction, only if that loyalty is to him. So he's

got a public defender who is taking this to the Supreme Court. I hope he wins, but again, just having a lot of money for lawyers as Trump does, doesn't necessarily mean you got the judgment to pick a good lawyer. So, as we're talking about legal issues and the impeachment of Biden, which just took the next step, it was now we have an inquiry that

has now been authorized by the House. Mike Johnson has said from the very beginning that not only were they going to do an impeachment to investigation of Biden or an impeachment of Biden, but he said it was actually required because of his crimes. But again, the crimes that he's focused on are not the crimes against Americans. Really, they are the crimes against his political opponents, the graft and the corruption which we all knew about before the twenty twenty election,

but they played a lot of games to cover that up. And I think that this is also a distraction again from this seven oh two, which many of us see as a betrayal of the Fourth Amendment and the American voters. But we'll see what happens with that. That's still in the works, but it's also going to be a distraction away from these twenty twenty politics and policies that they had a hand in. And nobody's going to bring any charges for that. He deserved this a long time ago. But there's a lot

more important crimes than what they're going to be coming after him for. Just like we talked about with Ken Starr doing a pass and all this stuff. A two twenty one to two twelve vote along party lines. Some people evidently not there. So far, the inquiry has been too pronged, one of them looking at the Biden family's financial crimes, the other one on the weaponization of the Justice Department and the FBI against Americans, perhaps against January six ers

or whatever. But we'll wait and see exactly how far that goes and how broad that goes. The Biden administration, like the Trump administration before, it has been so contemptuous and again doing gun control by executive order, piggybacking on to the president that Trump did. The Unit Party has never been more unified. Quite frankly, we're very divided on personality, but you know, in terms of the policy on the existential issues there, they're all together on that.

And so as you look at the inquiry, it looks like this is going to be something that's just going to be election to your politics. I don't think there's anything that's going to come out of it other than that. Hunter Biden was very defiant about this. He gave a speech in Capitol Hill. He goes to the Capitol, but he doesn't go inside. He's subpoenaed to participate in deposition for part of a congressional hearing. Instead, he shows up at the Capitol says, I'm not going to go there. This Trump

attack machine is after me, but I'm standing right here. And the leftist media was eating that up. Media Height is a story that you're looking at there. Look at that headline and a stunning news conference. I watched it. It was just boiler plate speech that was written for him by his daddy's speech writers, and it was totally nonsense. But you know again, Mediaite

does this story on it. Trudge features that I'm here today to acknowledge I've made mistakes in my life and I've wasted opportunities and privileges that I was afforded, and for that I'm responsible for that, I'm accountable, and for that I'm making amends. What is he doing. I don't know what he's doing to make amends. Maybe Tucker could fill us in, because they're such good friends. But I'm also here today to correct how Maga the Maga write has

betrayed me for their political purposes. I am first and foremost a son, a father or brother, a husband from a loving and supportive family. This reminds me. I talked about Gilbert Sullivan the other day. Reminds me of the Pirates of Penzance. You know, they have the policeman out there. When a criminal is not a Berglan, he's you know, he's he's contemplating the brooks and he's thinking about his mother and all the rest of this stuff. I mean, that's kind. He's just I'm just I'm just human like

you. And of course he is. But he says, I'm proud to have earned degrees from Georgetown University and Yale, and I'm proud of my legal career, my business career. And so you've got Breitbart. Nolty says, yeah, I'm a victim. He says, this guy is a victim. He refused to pay child support even while he was spending nearly a million dollars on sex and drugs, eight hundred and seventy two thousand dollars on hookers, on porn, and on sex clubs. While he fought tooth and nail to

not pay any child support for his baby daughter. Yeah, so I don't know when he says he's going to make amends, is he going to start paying us some child support? About this stuff? So the media is quickly backfilling on it, though. The New York Times is fixing up the quotes from Hunter Biden about financial involvement and business deals. We saw as Comer was coming out of the meeting, he was challenged and debated by a reporter from

the Washington Post kind of as a self appointed lawyer. They're going to do everything they can to defend this criminal family, and the Republicans are not going to focus on the big crimes. We'll be right back here news Now at apsradionews dot com or get the APS radio app and never miss another story. You're listening to the David Knight Show. All right, let's talk a little

bit about what is going on with the pharmaceutical wars. I had this from a listener who said, just catching up on some of the show, heard about your blood pressure and rhythm rhythmic issues, and I just tell everybody went to the doctor. Things are looking better, he says. I don't have any advice other than avoid most doctors and hospitals if if possible. And of course it's coming from Handy, who is who works in EMA, he says. He says, prayer and knowing, no matter what happens to this body,

Jesus will keep us is the best medicine that money can't buy. And you're absolutely right, Handy. But then he also says this about the jabs. He says people are still occasionally dropping dead here. He says, I think you're spot on regarding these jabs. He said, more sick and dead people and way less ob calls. It's the new normal. I saw a sixty year old male a few years a few days ago who died while playing golf. He looked at be in great physical condition from what I could see.

Another crew brought him into the er while I was dropping off a patient. He says. I did ask the other crew if he took the vaccine, and the other crew said, well, we don't know, but probably you see they know as well. These are people. This is another crew. They're all working ams and they see this stuff happening all time. Everybody knows what's happening with this. Why is it that Trump and Biden are leading the charge and all this, and why is it that we only have people

who are the ones who've been pushing this stuff from the day one. Well, we know why. A Green Beray veteran talks about the Army's letter to soldiers being discharged again. You know, they're desperate on recruiting, and they made some gestures that might be interpreted by some people as wanting to pull this stuff back. But he's not buying it, he said. Last month, the Army sent a letter two thousands of soldiers discharge for refusing to comply with

a shot mandate. He said the former soldiers who are involuntarily separated may request a correction for the military records. But he says it also states that individuals who desire to apply to return to service should contact their local recruiter. So, he says, the letter itself doesn't actually offer any policy change. Instead, the Army talks about how proud it is of what they did, reiterates tries to evidently justify what they did. He says, reiterates policies the Army

issued back in March of twenty twenty three. More importantly, there is no actual apology. In fact, it's quite the opposite. They say, we remain proud of the army's response to the pandemic. Don't put your people,

don't put yourself under people like this. They don't have the country's best interest at heart, as we see with what is happening with the wars everywhere with the Pentagon is pushing and they certainly don't have the best interest of their own soldiers at heart, do they, he says this former Greenbrae says this is

absurd. He said these policies of the army is proud of led them to kick out around two thousand soldiers, to mistreat many others, to deny soldiers their First Amendment religious freedoms, to coerce them to take what lawyers have argued was an experimental drug that potentially left many injured by the vaccines. What they're

so proud of was that they ignored basic common sense. They threatened and often destroyed the livelihoods of soldiers who volunteered to defend this nation and the constitution. Even with their lives well, I think we could also add that not only were many injured, but he died and these people destroyed the constitution and they destroyed their military readiness, which they're now trying to clamor back. This's why they and a lot of the hospitals who kicked people out because they mandated these

vaccines either get this or leave. All right, I'll leave now. They're desperate to have these people back because they decimated their institutions. He says. The unvaccinated were forced to wear masks, not allowed to use gems during certain hours designated only by the vaccinated for the vaccinated, and were subjected to weekly

invasive COVID tests. These individuals were times put into quarantine for extended periods, not allowed to leave their barracks or their ships, and in some training environments, unvaccinated soldiers were required to wear red wrist bands that said unvaccinated and red tape on their gear to indicate that their gear even was somehow unclean. And so this guy who was in the army says, this is exactly the opposite of what you want to do. You want to try to create cohesiveness and

a team. He said, these tactics, these policies pitted service members against one another when it is vital that service members have had had too will have each other's backs in times of war. This is one of the reasons why they said they were putting in high heels and let them walk around so they would get used to women and trainees and all the rest of this stuff. We've got to have cohesiveness, you know, you got to walk a mile

in their red high heels, that type of thing. And yet they did just the opposite of all that with the vaccines, because that was not what that agenda was about at all. It wasn't about creating cohesiveness. It's not about military readiness readiness. As a matter of fact, the d MED database was about military readiness and it was to monitor if that was being impacted with

a biological or chemical attack. It showed the truth, and they knew that the bioweapon, that the biological attack was the JAB, and so they modified the database. The DoD made it extremely difficult for the unvaccinated to progress in their career. These policies seemed to punish the unvaccinated. That's what JAB send to Arden said. Looks like you're trying to create two classes of people in society. Yep, that's what it is. Yeah, yeah, yes,

he smiles and laughs about that. Religious exemptions were either blanketly ignored or denied, which is an absolute denial of our First Amendment rights of freedom were worshiped and a violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The Army ignored its own medical policy. They did not accept medical exemptions based on prior immunity or infection.

They contradicted their policy. And he quotes the Army regulation here, and so you know, two thousand in the army, but over eight thousand service

members were discharged. Many of those kicked out did not get an honorable discharge, but rather a general discharge, which means that they don't get all their VA benefits, they don't get their educational benefits, they don't It affects their job applications, especially if they want to get a job within the government, which I think, even though for their own purposes, understand that's difficult on them. But in a sense, I think that as a silver lining for

the rest of us, because we need good people. We need good people who have a backbone, who have a conscience, who will stand up to an agenda like this. We need those people outside of this corrupt enemy of the American people, the government. And so in a sense, I think it's better for society if not for these individuals that they are not eligible for. You know, you get special preference if you're in the military, if you want to get a job for the federal government. But it's good that

we have these people outside of the federal government. It is not just the military. It says they're responsible for this treatment. Members of Congress, and he's right about that. Are they going to investigate themselves? Now? As a matter of fact, they don't want to talk about Trump or Biden or any of that because again, it's going to come back to them. So

Congress is going to be quiet about this. Republican and Democrat understand that most of if not all, of the members of Congress who sat by and rubber stamped all this stuff for Trump and for Biden are still there. Most of the people who were there did rubber stamp this. They didn't come in that recently. And about the only person who stood up to any of this stuff was Thomas Massey, and Trump wanted to end his career, was furious at him. He said, no, I want people to go on the record

about this. This is ridiculous to spend four trillion dollars and the other things that are being done. Members of Congress are told by their constituents what was happening to those in the armed forces. Yet for years, the majority of those who vocally praise service members and thank them for their service, weren't there to advocate for these people. Yeah, just like Sean Hannity. You know, I am so sick of that guy. What a hypocrite he is.

And of course he's now become a hypocrite on other pro life issues as well. He doesn't care about the lives of the military. Every time you get somebody on, oh, thank you for your service if they're in the military, and yet he's the first person I want to send them off to war. He talks about being pro life, and yet oh, these babies getting

in the way of our election. Let's get rid of these babies. So how do we fix this, says the Green bray Leary says, well, because DoD leadership has proven ineffective at policing itself, Congress has to step up and they have to hold military leaders accountable. So they'll have more hearings, more grand standing perhaps, but they'll do nothing. And it's not just the Department of Defense leadership that was ineffective, but as he points out, Congress

was as well. Congress didn't do anything. So we've got to get you something. That's why I say the federal government is done focused locally. That's where you still have a chance, you still have a chance to have an honest election, you still have a chance to have an effect. And it's where your vote is going to be the least diluted of all things. Where it's the most diluted of all things, is the federal government, if it's

even counted. Representatives must also hold regional hearings on this topic, he said, and so we need to. He talks about the people that were kicked out. He calls them involuntary veterans, kicked out before they wanted to retire. So he said, they need to get active. They need to talk about this, and I agree. I think everybody needs to push back on

this. I don't think that you know anything's going to be done, but we need not be silent about it because who knows, you know, it's when we're talking about this, we're not really expecting that the congressmen and women or the president are going to do anything about it, but we're actually talking to our fellow citizens and trying to educate them as to what's going on. That's the real issue here. It's waking up that critical mass. We're not

going to get these These politicians are not asleep. They're corrupt, and so we need to wake up the people who are asleep and not paying any attention to the people who have been lied to by the media. There must be a and zeropology, he said, I guarantee that something like this will never happen again. Well, that would be nice, not only from the Pentagon, but from all these politicians at every level, including the guys who are

now the front runners for presidency. Half the population thinks that masks should be mandatory on public transportation in the UK, and one fifth of them want a lockdown right now, right now. Isn't that amazing. That's how effective this propaganda has been. And they knew they could do it, you know, we had. They started doing this back in two thousand and two. I think there was some flu when you're there's some flu going around, and so

they scared everybody in Asia to death and they all started wearing masks. And now they still wear masks, and so it's going to be a really large percentage of the population that is going to continue to do that. In the UK, it's half of the people forty five percent say that masks should be mandatory on public transport. And again, this is why we want to have cars. They really would have locked us down big time if we hadn't had cars. Cars are the way that we were able to circumvent a lot of

this stuff. But there would have been no travel whatsoever if we were reliant on public transportation on airports, planes, trains, that type of thing. Currently, there are no legal COVID nineteen restrictions in place in the UK. Why is that, Well, it's because there's obviously not a pandemic and nobody is dying. Nobody was dying when they put these measures in. That's one

of the things we talk about all the time. Isn't it amazing? You know, China locks us down because you've got to They claim that a couple hundred people out of one point four billion died with something. We can't verify that even but they weren't even making a claim of it being an epidemic. But then every he starts locking it down, and we did that. We did that, the UK did that locked everybody down when down't nobody was dying,

and so why not lock everybody down when nobody is dying? Forty five percent support the reimposition of masks, sixteen percent of those saying they strongly support having to wear face mask on public transport, eight percent strongly recommending the rule of six, which limits the amount of people who can meet outside. Sounds like something from the prisoner, doesn't it? The Rule of six? So

millennials are the most likely to back these restrictions. Sorry about that, Travis, it's your generation, crazy, uh, and so thirty percent of them want to reintroduce the rule of six. Gen Z comes nextss to people that are eighteen to twenty four more supportive of the closing of nightclubs. Gen X aged forty one to fifty five, Baby Boomers fifty six to seventy four, they're both thirty six. Gen Z supported closing eye clubs twenty seven percent for

both Gen X and Baby boomers. You know, And then they talk about the Silent generation aged seventy five and up, the least supportive of any of this stuff, eighty percent of them opposing it. And so when you look at this, the other thing I think that's interesting about this. They talk about generational breakdown, demographic breakdown, who supports closing everything down? And the younger you are, the more susceptible you are to this, because again it's

the brainwashing of the schools. But I think it's interesting that, you know, as they use all these terminals terminology, they have the silent generation, the gen X, the baby boomers, all this stuff, but things like the silent generations that's straight out of the Fourth Turning, Isn't it interesting?

I continually find it interesting that everybody uses the terminology of the Fourth Turning, and they also know that we're in the midst of a fourth turning, war and economic unrest, but you know, always economic unrest, usually war, and all this culminating in twenty thirty, and yet nobody wants to talk about that. They'll all talk about the demographic breakdown of this stuff, but they don't want to talk about the overall context of the time that we're in and

how we're in this generational cycle that is happening. They'll talk about the different generations, but they won't talk about the ultimate truth of where we are in this, which is the Fourth Turning and it's because the people who are running the media. And I'm not saying that the Daily Skeptic is necessarily turning away from this, but again it's the people who run the media, the people who run the government. They don't really want you to know about this.

So we're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back, and you're listening to the Days midnight show. Bethany In on Rock Fan, thank you very much for the tip, She says, thank you for another great show, David. Merry Christmas, and may God continue to bless you and your family. Thank you very much. God has really blessed us, and thank you to all the listeners who have been such a blessing to us. We're coming up to the third year anniversary. And it was when I got fired.

It really wasn't sure what I was going to do, is I said before. I really expected to be fired in early November when I started opposing all this steing stuff and you stop the steal and all the rest of that stuff. But so you know, I was expecting it then still didn't have any plans, frankly, but came as a surprise a week before Christmas, and then we just said people start sending us money. We weren't even on PayPal at the time, and they sent emails to us, fortunately, and

it was real blessing from God that I didn't have. I had been using for quite a while a email publicly for people to contact us that was outside of the email that I had inside info Wars there, so people were able to send email to us and they just you know, sent money via PayPal and I didn't know what to do to pick this up. We looked at it, It's like okay, yeah, and then people started doing that. So that's when we decided to do the show. And so the first show

we've fired on it. I was fired at why I say we, because Travis was as well and so and Whistler was doing work for them as well. So all three of us got the acts and weren't really sure what we were going to do except move back here was what we wanted to do. And so again people started sending contributions and we started the program then on that following Monday, and it's been a real blessing and I thank all of you for doing that. It's a difficult way to fund this program. We don't

really look for advertisers. We've got a couple, you know, Tony supports us APS Radio, but for the most part it has been people who have just voluntarily supported this, and so we really do appreciate that, and the number of people that download this on a regular basis. We would not be as rich as Tucker Crosson, but we'd be doing just finebody we knew what to do with if we had a small fraction of people who download the show

pay for it. But we have a few people who are very loyal and have really supported us heavily on subscribe Star but also on zell and other places, and so we really do appreciate that. Thank you very much. MJ. So remember when Trump would stiff the people that worked for him in Vegas. Yeah, it was a foreshadowing of what he would do on as January the sixth, supporters first report that I did on Donald Trump when he became a candidate. I was not a fan of him from the very beginning.

It's like I felt, like I said before the way Julius soon did. Julia sign said we know Hillary Clinton as a warmonger or criminal. We don't know what Trump is. We'll find out, and we found out he's just like Hillary Clinton. But I did the report about how for one of his parking lots at one of his casinos in Atlantic City, there was a widow and he wanted to buy out her house and tear it down for his parking lot, and she resisted. It was just like Pixar's up, and so

he got the government to condemn her property and shut it down. And before he could build his parking lot over the house that he had destroyed, he went declared bankruptcy yet again. I think he had six bankruptcies with his casinos, and that tells us something about him as well, not just the way he treated his employees in Vegas, but also the number of bankruptcies he had there. As I said before, was it the same about somebody's confidency.

If he can't make money with a casino, it's almost as as good as being able to print money at the Federal Reserve. Of course, they're losing money too, they say, rumble, stealth patriot. I went to see two cousins the other day. Both of them had to have a leg amputated shortly one shortly after the other. I'm sorry to hear that my second cousin has been bedridden for two years after getting yon Brey syndrome. Yeah, vaccine. I got it one week after the jab was paralyzed and the neck down.

But now she's beginning to be able to use her hands and arms to

feed herself. I'm so sorry to hear that. You know, when we look at the sixty minutes report from years ago about the first swine flu and if you haven't seen that, I've played that a couple of times, but if you go back and look at it, that was when they had real reporting from Chris Wallace's father, Mike Wallace, And first of all, he exposed the whole fraud of that scare and he said, well, we're supposed to believe that it was some soldier who collapsed, and there was woman who

suffered from Geon Bray syndrome that he was interviewing, and she said, well, I looked at this, and this was highly publicized by the media. Here's this young fit soldier. He just collapses and nearly dies. And as they looked at it, they said, well, you know, this is a guy who was already you know, in the what they called the Navy

as sick bay. I don't know what they call it in the army, but he and two other soldiers were sick with the flu and they were there recuperating, and his commanding officer said, nope, you're going to do the march anyway, and got him out there. And he got out there and he collapsed because he had the flu. He just had the flu, and the he was given mouth to mouth resuscitation by the drill sergeant that was there, and he didn't get sick. He didn't get sick. The drill sergeant

did. But anyway, they used selective parts of that story to scare people of death. And so this woman said, so, yeah, I got it, and she had Gambrace syndrome and it had been a long, long struggle for her to try to be able to move in a very very limited way. It's very very crippling. That is something that's been around for these vaccines always, and I've known people who got the flu shot and got Giambore

syndrome. But this is so much worse. So many different things as well, and of course the Gambre syndrome is just one of many many things now and it is quite prevalent with this trump shot as well. The Supreme Court is going to decide whether not to restrict abortion by pill. That case is going to be coming before them. The drug mephipristone, if it's the way you pronounce it, I just call it Mephistopheles, because it's from the devil,

one of the most common abortion methods in the United States. Are going to rule on that. So the Republicans are waiting and baited breath. They are scared to death. No, not another abortion decision from the Supreme Court. And you got the left wing rags are out there, they're very excited about that. Oh, this is going to be another opportunity for us to

gen things up. And so you've got all of these people in the Republican Party trying to figure out how they're going to spin this because I said yesterday,

you know, oh the albatross, the albatross around the neck. And yet there's a Democrat who is using this as an opportunity to show people the babies that she discovered they were violently murdered, and she found their bodies and she's got pictures of it, and she's running as a federal candidate for president so that she can put those ads out and not have them be censored. Do you know, Travis, did we get censored anywhere for putting that picture

out of that thumbnail? Yeah, I said, let's use that thumbnail that she's putting out there. I mean, she's going to put it on the line for that, Let's do it as well. And Travis says, I don't know. I think that is so brutal. And I said that the people need to see what the truth is. And so I said, this is the hill to die on. It really is. And uh so, but apparently nothing has happened yet. Kelly on Conway is pushing Republicans to embrace

contraception. That's going to be the way that they're going to try to spend this, perhaps because they don't want to show you the truth about what this is. They don't want to show you the truth that abortion is violent murder of a human being. So let's talk about let's let's spend this, let's redirect people over here to contraception. And culture has gone completely to the other side here on this issue, siding with the abortion industry's desire to kill unborn

disabled babies, says the Life site news headline. And this after years of making money as a pro lifer and calling for an end of Roe V Wade after Roe v Wade ends, and Culture has shown herself to be like some of these other people, you know, like a blank mass. How he immediately started scrubbing his website. Oh he's just you know, he's blustering about what a great supporter he is of life and all the rest of this stuff. It's like these these videos that you'll see where you've got dogs that are

barking at each other on either side. Oh they're vicious. Oh they're just going to tear that other dog apart, both of them on either side of the fence, and you gradually start removing the fence, and they move along to keep that fence between them, and when the fence is completely removed, they're like, okay, well never mind. That's the way in Culture and

the GOP are when it comes to this issue and many others. And so maybe we should call her albatross in because she thinks that, you know, defending people educating people about this violent murder, she thinks that that's an albatross. You know what, maybe the people who support the violent murder of babies for their power and money, maybe they're the albatross do you ever think about that? Maybe they're the reason we can't have nice things like liberty. They

have sold out. They don't care if babies are ripped to pieces. They just want their little pathetic prize. Oh look, I won the election. Well, good for you. What are we back in high school again, King and Queen of the prom You won the election. Great? What did

you do to get it? You killed somebody. Last month, I highlighted her relentless campaigns as the writer for life site to blame the pro life movement for GOP election losses, insisting that abortion was a losing issue and that her new compromise position, as she put it, was to stop losing elections and to make abortion an illegal only for registered Republicans quote unquote, that's what she said. The GOP, she said, should instead stick to a fifteen week

federal ban, if even that much. The rock ribbed pro lifer, it seems, is only willing to advocate a legal regime significantly more liberal than most countries in Europe, liberal countries that she has mocked relentlessly for decades. And that's a good point when you look at what is going on in other countries, like in France, I think it's twelve weeks, and so you've got the so called pro life people, so called pro life Christians like Mike Pence

fifteen weeks. That's worse than France. She thinks the GOP must win elections in order for pro life laws to be possible. Yet she also thinks that they shouldn't pass those pro life laws because then they could lose the elections. So there you go. That sums it up completely, doesn't it. Yeah, we need people who are going to lead, not people who are going to grift. She says. A pro life movement, said Anne Culter, has gone from compassion for the child to cruelty to the mother and child.

And she said that in the wake of this situation with the trisomy eighteen and again, this is a terrible tragedy. But as one mother who had a child who was born with that disease, and at least I know that I didn't rip that child apart and I did everything I could for them. So

Life side News, let's be clear here. Culture is saying it's cruel to protect children in womb if they've been diagnosed with trisomy eighteen, and it's not cruel to decapitate, dismember, and disembowel those children in an abortion clinic. She even insinuates that allowing that child to live rather than be killed is also somehow cruel and repeats the eugenic talking point that such children are not compatible with life. It is also somehow cruel to the mother. Nobody who believes abortion

kills a child can also believe the things that Coulter just said. After an entire career of debunking insidious liberal talking points, culture has decided to take their side when it comes to aborting disabled children. And it's not just Dne Colter either who has flip flopped on this issue, and the Iowa it's the precious COVID nineteen and many other things. I don't know why that came up. I think that got hit by accident. Let's I wanted to pull up what

DeSantis said as he was talking to supporters in Iowa. Here is what he said about Trump's position on pro life. I think, though, one thing in this race that I think is important to point out is Donald Trump flip flopping on the right to life. So if you look in January of twenty twenty, when he was president, he stood in the March for Life, and he gave a speech, and if you read that speech, he said that all life is a gift from God. He compared the unborn child in

the mother's womb to being the image of God. He said it was important that we have protections in law, and that's what he was saying in January of twenty twenty. Now he has attack states that have enacted protections like heartbeat bills as being a terrible, terrible thing. So how do you square that March for Life speech with now trashing states that have advanced protections that he claimed

to cover. Was he not being honest in January of twenty twenty or has he just flipped his position to now what he's saying in twenty twenty three. I think that's a huge problem because we know people come at this from different angles. It's a big diverse country. There's a lot of division about it. But you should be consistent in your beliefs, especially on something that's very

fundamental, and he has not been consistent. And I think there's a lot of voters in Iowa who really care about this who need to know how he's changed his position. Yeah, that's very true, as a matter of fact, A life site says, well, it's not just ank. Take a look at all these people in the GOP, they said. A lot of people said, the only people who are more afraid of the overturn of Roe v. Wade prior to it happening. The only people more afraid of that

than the Democrats are the Republicans. They're very afraid of that. And so they said, take a look at how this is unmasking these GOP hypocrites and liars, people like Anculter, people like Trump, people like Sean Hannity, for example, Once Rowe was gone, one of their most reliable vote getters would be gone, plus a lot of fundraising to boot. And I say, that is why you see so many Republicans saying, well, we've got to bring it back to the federal government again. Let's have a national law.

We'll make it fifteen weeks, which is worse than secular France. And that's the way they're responding to this. And you've got a lot of national organizations that called themselves pro life that want to do that as well, because they want to make this a federal issue and they want to keep it there. And as I've said before. If you make that a federal issue and you say fifteen weeks, Democrat states say, well, they're going to nullify

that because they can. This isn't something that even the federal government should be involved in it all, so constitutionally they can nullify it, just like they nullified prohibition of marijuana. And so the liberal states will nullify that. They'll abort kids at any age, and the conservatives, once the Democrats get power again and they raise that from fifteen weeks to whatever they want to raise it to, the Republican states will obey that, just like the Republican States obeyed

Rob Wade when it was clearly a violation of the Tenth Amendment. And I said that all my life. And then you had the Dobs case where the Supreme Court said, yeah, that's right. So yeah, that is right. A Supreme Court decision is not the law of the land. They changed their mind about these things all the time. The Supreme Court changed its mind and decided that they would follow the Tenth Amendment. That freaked everybody out. Trump was one of the first to pivot away from that, as DeSantis point

out. But this person says, I was much less surprised to see Carrie Lake, the failed gubernatorial candidate from Arizona, flip on the abortion issue. And I agree with this person about Carry Lake. She has a cynical opportunist, a shameless liar who has attacked pro life candidates without the slightest regard for the truth. This is a person who has hypocritically, just like Trump,

been hypocritical on all of these issues. And just like Sean Hannity, who pats soldiers on the back every time he sees somebody in uniform, Oh, thank you for your service, and yet he wants to send them to war, somebody who has said that he is pro life, and yet he wants to win election. He doesn't want to save life, Yeah he is. He wants that little little trophy that he gets. Thank you for listening. Interested in a curated list of the finest classical music, find it now at

apsradio dot com. Let me tell you the David Night Show. You can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else you can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.