13Feb24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show. As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the thirteenth of February of Our Lord twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to take a look at what is happening with climate They're really going to make a change. We're going

to be joined in the third hour by Senator Frank Nicely. He's going to talk about how the natural asset companies that were unexpectedly shut down, how that agenda is still moving forward, and how it's moving forward at the state level. Just as we have states making subtle changes to enable CBDC through u SEC, through the Uniform Commercial Code, there is the same type of mechanism that is happening with conservation easements and other things at the state level here in Tennessee

and in other states you'll see the same thing as well. We're going to began, however, with an update to the news. We'll be right back. You know, for the longest time we've talked about pesticides and the effect on our health, and their effect on the economy and their effect on the food supply. Glyphaseit has lost well bear which owns it. It's created by

Monsanto. They bought Monsanto. There's been several glyphicit trials now that resulted in multi billion dollar judgments, but of course they believe they can appeal their way out of it. Bear knowingly bought Monsanto knowing that this was an issue, and of course now we have glyphaset has pervaded everything in the food supply.

And I was just talking the other day about a study that showed that it may actually be responsible for trends generational obesity, skipping the first and second generation,

hitting the third generation with massive obesity. They observe that in rats, and so it may and not just be our sedentary lifestyle and our junk food and the quantity of food that we consume, lack of exercise, but it may also have to do with a glyphist that is in the food, and that multiple factors are perhaps to the reason why we're seeing such an explosion in obesity. All these things there, but there's also other pesticides that are similar

to glyphysid. Dicambra is another one of these, And understand that both the cambra and glyphysid poison the land, poison the land for anything other than the seeds that are sown that are sold, not sewn, but sold by these corporations. This has already been a big factor in India, and Pierre Emidiar made a great deal of money off of this very thing in India, where the farmers would go in and they would buy these pesticides and they were great

at keeping weeds and other things out. Kills everything, kills everything except their genetically modified seeds. Now, apart from the health issues, you know what glyphisit does to us when it pervades the food supply, and the same thing with these other pesticides. Apart from those health issues which are being adjudicated in the courts now, there's also the typical globalist move to enslave people, to make them renters. Because what they did was essentially by poisoning the land for

everything except their seeds. You are now at their mercy. And every year you cannot create your own seeds, you must buy those seeds from Monsento or nothing will grow on your land. Or Bear now Bear BASF Military Industrial Complex Company and Syngenta. These are three dekamba based weed killers. We have a tendency to want to say dekembra but it is Dekemba. I'll try to keep that under control because people always write me the mispronounced things, and I appreciate

that I need to need to fix it when I mispronounced the words. But no, this is also kind of a sister idea. Again, you have to buy their seeds because it poisons it for everything else. And it's a big problem for dekemba because it drifts, It drifts in the air, it

seeps elsewhere, and so it destroys neighboring lands. This is one of the reasons why for Glycasset and for Decamba, you had these big companies years ago spent millions and millions of dollars to try to defeat local regulations that prohibited their use, you see. And so the response they spent in one jurisdiction, there was a local election where they were going to outlawn in that community because

it was drifting. These pesticides are drifting and destroying the land of people who are trying to grow non gmo stuff and trying to grow organic stuff, and the pesticide was getting into their land and destroying that. And so they spent over eight million dollars on TV ads in this one small community saturated it. The problem is when people know the truth, no amount of advertising lives will make any dent on it. You see, you can pay Travis kelce twenty

million dollars to push the next Peiser injection. But if you've watched a family member die or had friends who have died, if you've watched and paid attention to what's been going on these last three or four years, Travis kelcey in a football uniform pushing peiser poison isn't going to have effect on you. And of course, in these communities where they had seen what happened with this stuff, they knew what the issue was and there was no amount of advertising was

going to stop it. So this happened in jurisdiction. After jurisdiction, these big companies are spending millions of dollars. Again, small community eight million dollars. They did not want a trend to begin. Well, it was a trend, and so how did they stop it. They went to Washington and they pushed the thing that many of us call the Dark Act. We said, we're not going to have a patchwork quilt of these things being prohibited. We're going to have the EPA approve it, Well, that still doesn't change

anything. The communities could still criminalize that. But it's always you see that the influence is purchased in Washington. Washington is too far gone. It is a tool of the multinational global corporations. Washington is run by cabal that wants global government or governance, i should say, and headquartered preferably out of the United States, you know their area. But they're not for America. They're not for the Constitution, they're not for individual liberty. They don't want us

to own anything. And this whole thing is a scheme to turn all farmers into essentially sharecroppers for these big chemical companies. And so this trial now has yet again, this has happened before, yet again banned it. This is not the first time it's been banned by court for being dangerous three weed killers. And the court also says that the EPA broke the law. So it

says these corporations product is poisonous and the EPA broke the law. How did they break the law the same way the Trump administration broke the law with the vaccines, And it was a Trump administration that reinstated these just before the end of the election. I wonder how much they paid him under the table Trump, because it already had a court that had shut this stuff down, he

reauthorized it. He pushed the EPA really hard, just like he did the FDA, and bragged about how he pushed the FDA to do this without any testing. He pushed them to do it without any testing and without any notification as required by the rules. But the rules don't matter, The law doesn't matter, constitution doesn't matter. All that matters is do these people like me?

Do these people pay me? That's the Trump calculation, is a calculation of the Democrats as well, just trying to get people to understand He's not your savior. He's no different from Biden. He's no different from Hillary. He's no different from Bill Clinton or Jeffrey Epstein, if you will. These

guys all hang out together. They're in it for themselves. And Nicki Haley is coming after Trump, and rightfully so, for his stupidity for attacking and again it's not about issues, it's about personal attacks for both of them. And she claims that he doesn't respect the military. Of course he doesn't, does she She wants to send the military out to die everywhere. He calls them stupid, he says they're losers, and so forth, when they get

injured, when they get captured. But she wants to send them to every war. So which one's worse? So get back to this. The US Court this week banned three weed killers widely used by American agriculture, finding that the EPA broke the law and allowing them to be on the market, as they did with the vaccines as well, and so many now they've just said, well, we not even care about looking at any of these new vaccines.

It's now set and established a precedent. It's established a president three takamba based weed killers, which have been blamed for millions of acres of crop damage and harm to endangered species and natural areas across the Midwest and the South. This is the second time a federal court has banned these weed killers since they were introduced for the twenty seventeen owing season. They were reintroduced, okay, But as a matter of fact, when I did that, that's part of

that contest. For the anniversary of Einrand's book Atla Shrugged, I began by talking about this very thing, and that was back in two thousand and nine. So the corporation has got together. They took over the control of the food, and you know, everything was centralized, and it all went wrong, and it was you know, start at twenty thirty was the time date that I had on it, and I showed this desolate desert where nothing would grow this type of stuff. This has been known for a very long time.

The reason I did that was because of glife going back to the nineteen eighties other things like that. But now this is a newer version here. In twenty twenty, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its own ban, but months later, the Trump administration reapproved the weed killing products just one week before the presidential election, at a press conference in the swing state of Georgia. I had nothing to do with the presidential election. I'm sure that was

all just a coincidence. But a federal judge in Arizona ruled on Monday yesterday that the EPA made a crucial error in reapproving to CAMBA, finding the agency did not post it for public notice and for comment, as required by law. I don't like this system, but they don't even follow this system, you know, required by law. We have regulation without representation, as well as taxation without representation. The laws are supposed to be made by your elected

representatives. Instead you have these bureaucracies at publish rules, they put them up for comment. They're not accountable to any of these comments. You know, at least politicians, if they get a massive amount of response on something, they'll pay attention to it. And I know that's true. I've seen that

happen at the state level. I mentioned that before. In North Carolina we had a completely Democrat government, both houses and the governor, and they were allied with the big teachers unions and they wanted to come for homeschooling, and the few homeschoolers that were there at the time organized letter writing campaigns just hammered them with it, and they backed off. They backed off. I mean that truly was amazed they and it's the number of responses that they get.

But the bureaucracy doesn't have to back off because they don't have to face reelection. They don't care what you say about the rules. They'll do what they want. And they've been captured by corporations and so they didn't even bother to go through this rule thing. Why bother I'm going to do what I want to anyway, right, just a formality. But the judge said, you skipped that, and you also skipped the testing. This is rushed through.

Yeah, that's how you got the warp speed vaccine. You skipped the testings. Trump so again, you know, do the vaccines, no tests, do this, No tests, no notification, no rules on the pesticides. He just needs to know who's going to pay him. The judge wrote that the EPA did not allow many people who were deeply affected by the weed killer, including specialty farmers, conservation groups, and more, to comment. Well, again, that was like the lockdown. We've never had a lockdown of

healthy people before. We've never had a lockdown where non essential businesses, in other words, the businesses that are not big box retailers on Wall Street, those non essential businesses, they were shut down. They didn't get a chance to weigh in on any of this stuff. You had a bureaucracy under Trump administration to shut them down. There was no comment period. And oh, by the way, if you made comments, so you got in trouble, you got purged. And if you refuse to comply with this, they would

shut you down. Permanently. So all of this stuff seems to be the same procedure. Let's rush this through, no testing, no comments. I don't really care what you say. You're non essential, just like the lockdown. So this lawsuit was filed by farmer and conservation groups. They said time and time again, the CAAMBA cannot be used without causing massive and unprecedented harmed to farms, as well as endangering plants and pollinators in other words bees.

But see this is also about the global agenda to turn everybody into renters. Because for all practical purposes, once you poison your land with this stuff, it's owned by bear monsanne to you can't do anything with it except grow their seeds, and you're at their mercy. When they raised the price of the

seeds. As a matter of fact, it got so bad that with glyphasset they had, they would go out and they would look at stuff that was going on other people's property, and they if the seeds went on to another person's property, they would come after them for you know, just like the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or you can't fix your tractor, they would come after them. If these farmers tried to get off of it in some areas, or if it went on to another farm, they would sue them for

intellectual property theft for these genetically modified seeds. It is the same type of scheme we see happening everywhere everywhere. The kamba was introduced to American agriculture in nineteen sixty seven, but was never widely used during warm months because it was well known that the chemical can volatize and move long distances when temperatures climb.

Volatization is when dicamba particles turn from a liquid to a gas an hours or days after the irbicide has applied, in effect turning into clouds of weed killer and causing landscape level damage. So that's the process. It isn't that they're out there spraying it and the wind is blowing it when it's hot. It turns into a gas, then moves out and drops down on neighboring property. That's the dacamba drift needs some kind of Brazilian music to go along with it,

right. Dicamba is also prone to drifting on wind far from where it is applied, and it can move into drainage ditches bodies of water as runoff during raining events. What do you think it does in your body. Oh, they don't care about that. They don't care about life is that either. So they encouraged Monsanto encourage farmers to buy their newly created decamba tolerant crops

the seed stuff I was talking about, just like life as it. Farmers buying these specialized seeds could spray to camba on fields while the crops were growing, killing the weeds but not the precious commodities. And again the Renter model poisoned the land for everything but their stuff. De Camber resistant crops have been planted on as many as sixty five million acres estimates the EPA, which is an area larger than the state of Oregon that they have now poisoned poisoned.

In February twenty twenty, a federal jury in Missouri awarded the state's largest peach farmer two hundred and sixty five million dollars were damage to his farm, though that total was later reduced by a federal judge. So that's February twenty twenty.

In June of twenty twenty, Bear, who now owns Monsanta This Bear announced a four hundred million dollar settlement with soybean growers that had been damaged by non target drift, and so the Trump administration runs it, says that's February, then June, the Trump administration runs it through just a week before the election to reapprove it. You think they knew, of course they knew.

You think the EPA knew. Of course they knew. Months later, they authorized it just a couple of months later without comment for a globalist, corporatist scheme. For years, Bear and Basf have blamed other factors than their weed killers for the damage that we all see, you know, not just poisoning, but killing bees, other things like that. Discovery documents, however, turned up in this litigation show that the companies knew that their decambo weed killers

would probably lead to off target crop damage. They think, we don't know, but we do, right. We know that they know. We know that they're lying. We know that they know exactly what they're doing. Other documents filed in the lawsuit show the EPA was in a rush to approve the

CAAMBA in October twenty twenty to get it done by the election. Anybody look to see if any of these companies made any donation to Trump or to Trump packs or anything like that scientists complained that they did not have enough time to do a proper analysis. One year later, the EPA issued a report that found de camba was still spreading for where it was applied to adjacent areas.

It was doubtful that de camba, used on tens of millions of acres of cotton and soybean crops in the US could legally be kept on the market. But again we see the same mo We see the Trump warp speed hustle for this, just like you did for the plandemic, the global plandemic, the poison poison land for everybody, everything, like their seeds. You know. As a matter of fact, this memere okay, So after this injection you may feel a bit ill. That's mainly because it's poison. Yeah, mainly

because it's poison. Bar de Canva based herbicide they're inherited when it acquired Monsanto in twenty eighteen. And of course they knew all this when they bought it, just like they knew all about glyphyst The news comes a particularly bad time for Bear because they just had the Monsanto trials happening there. Sinjenta is also facing nationwide litigation over its paraquat, herbicide, which thousands of plaintiffs claim causes

Parkinson's disease. And of course, if the term paraquat sounds familiar, is because they were doing massive spraying of marijuana fields with US too in Central and South America. Paraquat, you know, give people Parkinson's disease. Meanwhile, perhaps perhaps Bear was grateful to Trump, and maybe sent Genta was grateful to Trump. But as I said yesterday, maybe he's wondering if Taylor Swift is going to be grateful to him or the copyright changes that he made. I

haven't looked at those changes, the Music Modernization Act. I seriously doubt anything coming out of Washington is going to benefit singers. But I don't know that he's necessarily doing this so he can shame her into endorsing him. I don't think she cares. I think he's doing this for his bass. I think his bass can't stand Taylor Swift, and so he picks a fight with her. This is the way the whole thing works. If he can pick a fight with her, it helps him. They hate Taylor Swift, So if

Taylor Swift hates Trump up, that makes him look better. They hate the Democrats. So if the Democrats use law fair against Trump and indict him for this stuff, they love him. Well, if these people hate him that much, he's got to be really good if they're going to go to all this trouble, got all this lawfair for this stuff, and of course they want Trump as the opponent as well. But and then he, you know, does the same thing with the judges that he's doing right now, Taylor

Swift. He mocks them. He hopes that they take the bait and come after him. That's the basis of his popularity. It's not based on what he did. He's now talking about doing conservative things, which he never did. He did the opposite of what he's talking about. Now, now we've got candidate Trump, We're about to get Trump, you know, four point zero. I guess you get candidate Trump the first time, then President Trump is Trump two point zero. Then we get candidate Trump three point zero.

Then we'll get president Trump four point zero if he wins as a former president Trump making a play for Taylor Swift, writes bry Bart, No, exactly the opposite. He's he's pushing her, goating her, baiting her as a ploy to build up his base. I don't like Taylor Swift, you know that, of you wretch. I'm sick of seeing Taylor Swift, and I'm sick of seeing Trump and every every article as well. Maybe you're getting sick

of the two of them as well. Trump even said that he was a fan a Swiss boyfriend Travis Kelsey, even though he said he may be a liberal and probably cannot stand me. Well, they're would be getting along together. Look, Travis Kelcey made twenty million dollars for pushing this Pfiser crap. And you know, mister Pfizer wouldn't have made twenty million dollars if mister Trump, the father of the vaccine, had put this stuff out. He's the

Pfiser father. He's the father of the Pfizer vaccine. So mister Pfiser ought to be very happy about Trump, don't you think. No, of course not. They will be on opposite sides of all this stuff. Thank you very much. I appreciate that, Karen be on Rock Fan, thank you for the tip. I appreciate that. Oh, by the way, you know, speaking of the of Travis Kelsey, look at this, you know this is everybody has seen this by now, the guy that's the head coach.

The look of this guy. Everybody's saying Andy Reid. I thought, who is Andy Reid? Is he the offensive line coaches? No, No, he's the head coach. He comes out, pushes them. Other players have to pull him off, and so I don't know, you know, after after young of the coach, I don't know that Travis Kelsey is going to have be amenable to Trump either if you do that. Uh, the man that Maga praised too. You know our Pfizer father who worked in DC.

You know I would be Trump's name anyway, and angered, Travis Kelsey slammed into Andy Reid with enough force to knock him over. These other guys didn't catch him. Maybe this is a warning to Taylor Swift, don't get on this guy's bad side. She's a lot smaller than that than that coach. That coach has got a good bit of mass on him if you notice that. But she doesn't. She might not want to double cross him.

They had it was all over social media. Lip Readers said, well, this is what he was saying, and a lot of jokes, one of them, if we lose, she's gonna dump me, And then write a song about me. That's my favorite one that I saw with all these different ones. Most likely that will eventually happen. And as Valentine's Day is approaching, I thought this was interesting on Reason magazine, pull this picture up, Travis and show this. Why are teens rest? It's not social media?

Per se? Has Reason magazine show that picture? Yeah, I look at that picture and that got my attention because that guy on the left was me when I was a teenager. They're with my sacks. I had a lot of things that I was doing, you know, I was, I was in a band, I was socially active with a lot of different people in that sphere I was. I didn't participate in sports. We did a lot of water skiing and other things like that, and you know, with friends.

But today the teens are like the guy on the right hand side, doing nothing but looking at the phone. That's their entire life, you know, the black mirror, as they say, that's the real issue. Social media is just one aspect of that, and it really is the isolation. And so this is a very long article. I'm not going to go into from Reason. Maybe the problem for the teens is not the screens, but what the screens are replacing, and they look at it from one aspect or

the other. They talk a little bit about the damage that was done by the plandemic lockdown and things like that and how and reason. We'll say, well, but you know, the screens were kind of a lifeline for some of those teens who are locked down with the plandemic. It really doesn't matter.

They look at adolescent depression, isolation, and even when you look at things like teen pregnancy rates out of Wodlock pregnancy that has declined significantly, driving fatalities of decline significantly because the kids are isolated and they're setting in their homes and you know, those are things that happen when kids are out and about, but you know, those are both signs really of increasing isolation. And it's not just there. So one study found that the social media does have

an effect. They said that one study found that adolescents who spent more than three hours a day on social media faced double risk of experiencing poor mental health. They said when Facebook was rolled out. In another study across college campuses in two thousand and four to two thousand and six, they found a nine percent increase over baseline depression and a twelve percent increase in anxiety after Facebook was

put out. But of course that's all just the beginning of all of this, and it all really is this program to isolate us that was just a major, major push during the plandemic to have everybody isolated as they seek to have us. But the Washington Post jumps in on this because tomorrow is Valentine's Day, and so the Washington Post talks about the anti Valentine Day movement. They're actually making a virtue of isolation and of not having a relationship because you

could get hurt in this. You know, don't try to connect with anybody in a relationship because you could get hurt. Maybe the Washing Post for tomorrow, maybe they'll change their subtitle to Romance dies in Darkness or in Isolation, And it is really about isolation and anti social behavior that they're celebrating. They're saying, this is part of people's identity. They said Valentine's Day has more

potential to hurt, harm, terrorize, terrorise the students. Can you imagine that start of February's triggering for anybody who isn't feeling it again more this, you know, woke Marxist nonsense. They said. There is a lot of T shirts that are being sold. They are anti Valentine's Day. One of them is there's love in the air, try not to breathe design and it shows somebody wearing a combat gas mask because you know, that's what this is

about. Mask up, mask up, keep yourself away from dangerous human beings. I mean that that that T shirt there is essentially a distillation of all this fear that is being pushed to this generation of teenagers for the last several years and done to them for years by everything. Another one fries before guys, fries before guys. You say, mener evil. So you should be a lesbian, you should join LGBT. Uh. That's one way to uh enforce depopulation, isn't it declining birth rates? A lot of it is social.

A lot of it is chemical and environmental that is happening, but there is a social component to it as well. Again, it's all these different things, just like we're talking about olbesity epidemic. It's all these different things all at once. They don't try just one thing, you know, these these evil satanic plots, they don't just try one thing. They've got a

confluence of events that hit us in multiple fronts. Valentine's Day, they said, to the distaste of many and to the delight of some, underscores away. Our culture intertwines love with money when we talk about how people profit. But wait a minute, weren't they just celebrating this anti Valentine's Day merchandise? Yeah, this is after all the Washington Post marketing is pivoted to hosting Gallantine's Day again. More lesbian is a more isolation of people from each other.

You too, can sit with your other single friends and drink wine until you're all weepy. No, I know, Oh you could go to You could watch a Taylor Swift concert too, same type of thing. I mean, Taylor Swift stuff is really kind of like Gallentine's Day, isn't it. It's all women. It's amazing. And you know when I played that video, I didn't talk about that. Yesterday. I played that video of the Silent Disco where they took over this ancient cathedral, Canterbury Cathedral. It was all

women in that picture. It was all women, wasn't I didn't see any men. You know, it's all women dancing around in the dark. Waving glow sticks and having you know, the headphones on, glowing headphones. Can of most guys are gonna look at that and go, yeah, I know, that's what I was just about to say. I can't imagine any guy wanting to do that. So it's a cathedral full of women dancing with each other. So yeah, the dating trauma, you know they they have.

The next thing they go to is just how traumatizing. This is, terrorizing and traumatizing it is. And they talk about Maryland teens going through what they call Connection Counseling. This is an organization and Maryland there because you're washing posts is out of DC and so these are kids who have been so traumatized by their dating experiences that they're going to see a psychologist to finish them off. I mean, this is it's psych Collegists are just gonna take it down the

mix. It's absolutely amazing. Don't get hurt, isolate yourself from all human contact, and as I said, to do that is a good thing. And they call that an act of self preservation and of self love. I found pictures of the author of this article, and I understand why she's had a rough Valentine's thing. When I started reading this, I looked at this. I thought, wait a minute, is this Taylor Lorenz. No, it's somebody, it's somebody else. Uh, yeah it is. It is

truly amazing self love. In the last days, people will become what lovers of self right, and it be promoted as a virtue by the mainstream media. Finally, they say, she says, finishes it up says it's all about choosing yourself. Bravo teens, That's why she finishes it. Well, my question about all this stuff is what would Chuck Norris do. Chuck Norris on WND has a column and he wrote about Valentine's Day Chuck Norris, so we better pay attention, he says, A long journey to find my true

Valentine. And so, as an antidote to the Washington Post, let's listen to a Chuck Norris on. Let's listen to Chuck Norris on this. You know, do I have I'm looking at Yeah, I do have that. Okay, I got that in the boxer, he said. In a week when the world celebrates love, I was thinking, is love a battlefield a blessing? Or is it both of these things? He said? I recently read a poll, says Chuck Norris. They reported eighty six percent of Americans

believe true love really exists. Sixty seven percent said they themselves had experienced it. Most of the rest indicated that they had not found it yet but were hopeful that they would. About two thirds one third have given up. Not surprisingly, the older respondents were more likely to say that they had experienced true love. He said. Between the ages of thirty and forty four, sixty

five percent said they experienced true love. It goes up a little bit between forty five to sixty four, goes up to sixty nine percent from sixty five percent, but then it jumps up to seventy five percent for those above the age of sixty five. He says, So what the poll seems to say

is stay alive long enough, and you really will experience true love. Or it could say that maybe the younger generations not even trying if they're listening to the Washington Post and the bad advice that there's being pushed on them by the established media and schools. He said, like so many of you, I had lots of trials and errors in the earlier parts of my life, he said, but at the ripe age of fifty eight. I met my true love in Valentine when I was filming Walker, Texas Ranger. One of my

best friends, Larry Morales, came to Dallas for a visit. He said, I was living a single life. Even though I had had a successful TV series, I was miserable. I had devoted my life to fame and fortune, and I'd learned a hard lesson in those years. If your whole life is spent trying to make money, and you neglect the important people in your life, you'll create a deep void in your heart and soul, not to mention your relationships. And I fell into this trap, says Chuck Norris.

Yeah, and of course the teens are isolating, not even for fame or fortune, just you know, because of phone, because they're told don't get hurt. But he said, his friend Larry realized that he had everything, but he had nothing. So his friend Larry brought in a lady that he wanted to introduce to him. He said, I was at a restaurant with about twelve friends and he had a date. Larry came in with this young lady. He began introducing her to everybody, but he says, I

was engrossed in conversation with my date. I didn't even notice until Larry called my name and said he wanted me to meet Jenna. I looked up at her, and all I could see was an angel staring into my eyes. And I stuttered and I said, oh, er, hi, nice to meet you, he says. When I finally turned back to my date, all I could see were daggers in her eyes. She immediately left, and so they talked quite a bit, and so the next day she invited him

to a fashion show where she was going to be modeling wedding gowns. One particular gown had a long train, and as Gina was walking, it hooked on a potted plant and she dragged it down the runway. She was quite embarrassed. Kidding Lee, I said, well, I was thinking about buying that potted plant. It doesn't have any use for her wedding dross, right, And I saw that, and that really really resonated with me, because the first time I saw Karen was months before I transferred to the University of

Tampa. She was with the marching band there. She was a towirler. As a matter of fact, she had had a scholarship that she turned down and can this full scholarship for twirling that she turned down because she wanted to go to Florida and so she was very good at it. But I was there with a date and we were watching the game and I was kind of laughing at the band because the band was so tiny, very small school,

and they had a very small marching band. We marched about one hundred and fifty people, and we had a very good marching band in high school. These guys sounded pretty good, had a big sound, but there's a few people. And one of the reasons for that, I used to the used to self deprecatingly build themselves as the biggest little band in the South because even though they had a few players, most of them were playing professionally. They

had really good people. No deadwood in that marching band. So we were looking at and I was kind of laughing about how small the band was, and then I saw this major wrette trip on a flag and fall, and so we were laughing about that as well. That was Karen, and within a few months I was dating her and I was in that band. So that's how life turns things around, you know. Never laugh too hard at something or you may wind up getting put into it by God. So anyway,

that was the beginning of their relationship as well. But he had some interesting things to say. He said, they got married, and they've been married now for twenty six years. Our fiftieth anniversary of our first date is coming up on Saint Patrick's Day. We've been married for forty four years. He said. Love is a battlefield, but it's also one of the biggest blessings in this life. And the blessings far outweigh the battles if you are

doing it right. So Chuck Norris has some advice for you. Better listen. If you're dating, you must not leave your brains at the door. Don't merely consider the other person's outer traits, but discover what makes the person tick on the inside. Don't compromise, compromise your morals or your principles when searching for a soulmate. Make sure your core values and your beliefs align with

the other persons. You know. They said, we watched Shenandoah the other day, and Jimmy Stewart's character has got some great advice for his future son in law. And here's this scene. Yes, do you like her? There's no easy job, Sam, take care of a woman, Oh, sir. They expect things they never asked for. And when they don't get them to ask you why, sometimes they don't add and they just go ahead and funny, ship, are not doing something you didn't know you were supposed

to do on the what? For instance? It Well, that's a very difficult question to answer, Sam, You're never quite sure. It's just that it's sort of you might say, relative relative to what's it to how they're feeling at the moment, and how's that? You never know? I don't believe I really understand what you're trying to tell me, Sir. I know, I know. I never understood it myself. I never understood it. It's just one of those things, Sam, it's ron you just don't ever

see it. I suppose suppose Jenny started to cry one day. You don't know what she's crying about, so you asked her, why do you follow me? Sam? Yes, you asked her, and she won't tell you. And that's when you ask her what it was you did that caused her to cry. She still won't tell you, and that's when you start to get angry. But don't get angry, Sam. She won't tell you why she's crying because she doesn't know. Women are like that sound, and that's

exasperating, it's but don't let it make you angry. None. When she gets like that, just walk up and hug her a little bit, because that's all they really want when they're like that sound, a little loving. You understand me, don't you, No, sir, you don't. Well, yeah, that's a lot of truth right there in that little two minute clip there. Back to Chuck Norris from Jimmy Stewart, he says, Socrates once said, by all means, Mary, if you get a good wife,

you'll become happy. If you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher. I guess his wife was not a good one. Chuck Norris said

the same thing as true for husbands, right, ladies. Speaking of humor, he said, Entry number nine and my one hundred and one Official Chuck Norris Facts Book reads on Valentine's Day, Chuck Norris gives his wife the still beating heart of one of his enemies, and being romantic, Chuck believes that every day should be Valentine's Day. Well, he said, GENA and I decided early on, through think and then that we were going to stay together

no matter what. See, that's why you have marriage. Marriage is that commitment. And I see that so much in this generation view separate bank accounts and all the rest of this stuff to me. You know that type of stuff like prenuptial agreements and separate bank accounts that kind of backs off from this commitment. You need to commit or not. You need to make up your

mind. We dedicated ourselves to fight for love in us and in others, and to discover all the fruits that God intended to bless us with in our marriage and our long term love journey. Chuck Norris says, pray together, ask for divine help for you, for your family, for your country, for your world, he said. Doctor James Dobson once said, a great marriage is a union of two good forgivers. So be patient, be kind, don't go to bed angry without resolving. I had somebody asked me last

week, you know what does it mean? He says, don't let the sun go down on your wrath. Well, it was in that context. Don't let this stuff fester. Don't go to bed angry with this stuff. Finally, he says William Penn found at Pennsylvania One said she is but half a wife who is not a friend. Yeah, going back to Jimmy Stewart, do you like her? If you like like her, the love will come and it will grow over the many years. We'll be right back.

H h See if you like the Eagles, dog doesn't Hallway, the cars and Heuey Lewis and the news, they say the hotter Lewis and you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen now at apsradio dot com. Well, I want to thank Eric and James on Rockfan. Thank you both of you for the tip. I would ask all of you if you would like the stream, if you are following in, if you do like it, that helps us with visibility. That's very important.

Of course. You know, if you want to send a tip, that's great too somewhere. If you want to support us on subscribe star, that has been a big base of our support for the longest time, and especially after we got shut down on PayPal, But we do have other ways. If you'd like to support the program, you can find those at Ddavidnightshow dot com. It will show you not only where you can find all the different live streams, the video archives that we have, as well as where you

can listen to the podcast. And the podcast audio is not live at the moment. We're looking at a way to perhaps make that the case, but of course you can with Rumble. And you know that reminds me, I forgot to put up what Noel sent us about how to do that travels. We need to put that up on the website, the instructions of how to listen to the audio live on Rumble, even shutting down your phone if you want to do it that way. So we really do appreciate the support.

That's what keeps this program going. Let's talk a little bit about what is happening in terms of the constant surveillance state to surveil us, to control us, to immobilize us. And when you look at what is happening in London, the anti ul e Z campaigners and that's the ul EZ. These are the ultra low emission zones. In other words, what it means essentially is that nothing but an EV is going to be able to travel there, and if you have something other than an EV, it's going to cost you a

little bit more than fifteen dollars day to move your car. Well, people are not happy about that. This is something that was imposed by Sadik Khan against the will of the London Council. He just overrode them and put it in hisself and himself and he's got cameras all over London. And of course London has broken into all these different boroughs, districts, very much like New York, you know, really all these different small towns that grew together,

but they still have some local government governance there. One of them, one borough of Sutton, has just had a major protest against these and they had about four hundred protesters in this one borough called Sutton and they basically blocked every one of these cameras in that area. Four hundred protesters took part in the borough wide demonstration, organizers say involved obstructing more than eighty cameras on a Sunday

afternoon. A bus driver of the campaign group Action against Unfair Ules Ultra Low Emission Zones says the demonstration meant that no ULES camera was functioning in the South London borough as At least twenty other cameras have already been damaged or removed.

These people have been coming after these cameras and taking them down. London Mayor Khan's expansion of the scheme last year saw about ninety percent of the boroughs fall under the ULES rules overnight, and the decision was fiercely opposed by the council and a petition was set up to delay the expansion until public transportation in Sutton, for example, had improved significantly and they got thousands of signatures. Pasidiq

Khan doesn't care. This guy is a foreigner that's been brought in to rule these people to push this globalism. They want to ban privately because they don't have sufficient public transportation. Banning private vehicles and then not having any sufficient public transportation, that's a way to just mobilize these people into the fifteen minute city plan. See how it all works. Well, there's nothing I can do

about that. Oh well, if you can afford to pay for the more expensive evs, well that'll be fine until the power grid drops to its knees, because they are wrecking that as well. Over emissions, and that's already begun in the United States. You got the EPA already is now starting to play this emission game to shut down power plants. So if you buy the UV the EV, are you going to be able to drive it? No, this is the this is the scheme. Sadiq Khan was one of the

founders of this C fortys thing. And of course they're upfront about what they want to do. They want you to have no meat, no dairy. They want you to have maybe one trip under one thousand miles on a plane every three years. They want you to be able to buy three articles of clothing a year. I mean it is draconian. It is taking us back

to the dark ages. And these people are all about it. And so city Con was a co founder, a co founder with Bloomberg in New York City, And so what is happening in New York Do they have these ul easy cameras there yet? No, but they've got speed cameras up. If you're going to measure speed or any of these other things. Once you set up all these cameras to start monitoring the way people drive or if they drive, or what they drive, it's a trivial thing to change it from speed

to emissions. And so in New York City what they call super speeders people not that they're going really fast, and I can't. I've driven in New York, which was the last time I was in New York to drive was back in twenty twelve when I was there to cover the UN Arms Trade treaty that they were trying to ram through, and parking and traffic was so bad.

I was there with my sons and we were doing interviews for National Association Gun Rights and of people who are there from industry, people who are there, were politicians and things like that, and so we were there shooting footage and all that kind of stuff. It was so difficult to do. We just had Karen circling the van, you know, while we were there at

the UN What a mess. I can't imagine anybody speeding there. They did have signs saying don't honk the horns, three hundred dollars fine, and everybody's constantly honking horns and see anybody getting fine. But how in the world could you speed there? Well, speeding is going ten miles per hour or more over the speed limit, so I guess, you know, if they got a speed limit of maybe you know, fifteen or twenty miles per hour, and if you're going thirty one miles per hour. You know the camera's going

to snap you right there and you get hit. Maybe there's a spot, a little spot where you can speed up to thirty miles an hour before you have to stop and wait for two or three minutes. Again. Super speeders in New York are people who have tracked who have racked up over one hundred infractions for going ten miles per hour or more above the speed limit. And so they got all these different speeding tickets. You know, it's like you

would think about a super speeder, you think somebody's going super fast. No, it's the quantity of tickets that these people are getting. Now, what I find interesting about this is that one individual alone has three hundred and seventy three tickets and they never took his license. Now, when I was going up, if you got you know, every time you've got a speeding ticket,

you got points, your insurance goes up. But if you go over, you know, if you had like three tickets or speeding tickets or something like that, you would lose your license. This guy's got three hundred and seventy three tickets and he's still driving because they're making a lot of money. Isn't it about safety or anything else. This is about making money, and

it's about surveillance, and it's about control. So they said the city was equipped with thirteen hundred New York City had thirteen hundred automated traffic enforcement cameras spread throughout its burrows by twenty twenty, but only four drivers reached the super speeder threshold of having more than one hundred tickets. But they said by twenty twenty three as a number of these cameras doubled. So now they've got twenty six

hundred cameras, twenty six hundred just to measure the speed of cars. When are they going to change this to again? Ultra low emission zones and things like that, you know, you have to have they can look at and of course what they're doing writing these speeding tickets. They have automated license plate readers. So if they automated license plate reader looks at your license plate, looks it up, that's a diesel car or that's a gasoline car, that's

not an ev okay, find them right there. All the mechanism is already there, you see. They just have to flip the little switch to start dinging you for something else. So they said the count. By twenty twenty three, they double the number of cameras, and then they got twenty six hundred cameras. And now they instead of four drivers who have racked up more than one hundred tickets, they have one hundred and eighty six drivers who have

more than one hundred tickets. And the one the top driver, the guy I would congratulate is the guy who's got three hundred and seventy three tickets. Cities are increasingly turning to automated enforcement. Yes, because it's going to go from speed to CO two surveillance control lockdown. It's not to be like an acronym scl I did that for the genetic code injections of Trump. I used to call them gcis. But yeah, we could call this SCLS Surveillance control

and lockdown if you will. This is all began because of something they call vision zero. Isn't an interesting you see you have zero emissions by city con in London. Then his sister tyrannical City in New York, they have vision zero. Vision zero is not about emissions, but it's about safety, safety, and we don't want to have any pedestrians injured or any automobile accidents,

and so we're going to that's our vision zero thing. In order to do that, we're going to put speed bumps in, We're going to put cameras in. We're basically going to eliminate cars because that's the only way you're going to get to zero. Whenever you got freedom, it gets a little bit messy. And you know, just like we're talking about with dating, right zero, heart's broken. Everybody, stay by yourself, don't connect with anybody else's right to talk to anybody else. You know, if you try to

talk to somebody else, he gives you a cold shoulder. Now, oh his heart's broken, Well, get over it. Get over it. The Blausio they've got the twenty six hundred cameras operating twenty four to seven and so these super speeders now represent a majority of speeding violations. They have outstanding fines that average over eleven thousand dollars each. Wow. See this is for money.

It's not for safety, right, it's for money. It's for them to make money finding you, and it's for the bigger guys up another level to make money by controlling you and renting everything to you and renting you transportation by the right, if you can afford it, right, That's what these self driving taxis are all about. And again, all of these ride sharing programs, as Travis Kalalnik said, at the very beginning of it, the guy that started Uber, he said, Yeah, what makes our rides expensive

is that other dude in the car. We're going to get rid of him. We're going to have self driving cars. But of course there's not really going to be any cheaper. They will still charge you by the ride, and they will make a lot more money out of this. So what I found interesting was that there's no pushback in New York City against these cameras like there is in London. Now, of course London they've gone to a complete lockdown. You're not going to use your car at all. So they've accelerated

this a lot faster than New York has. But that is the goal for both of these places. Again, the two cities that were the foundation of this see forty stuff forty cities that's now one hundred major cities are more around the world. New York is advancing traffic law enforcement with proposals to hike fines and lower speed limits. Yes, let's give everybody a ticket. If you even move this thing right, you're going to get a ticket. We're going

to lower the speed limits, raise the fines. We're going to make it impossible for you to drive, and we're going to make it unaffordable for you to drive. So you're driving is either going to be useless because you're going to be going so slow and have to be so worried about getting a ticket, or they will make it unaffordable. Useless or unaffordable. Which would you like? Despite challenges, New York's method of connecting tickets to license plates and

its extensive camera network could inspire other cities. Oh yes, it will. And this is why I keep saying things are going to be better or worse for you depending on your local government. Let me hammer that in. You think Trump is going to do anything about this, of course not. You think Congress is going to do anything about this, of course not. This is a bad local government coming at people, and we've had situations. I

think in Texas they outlawed red light cameras. You had some bad jurisdictions where they put those things in and you know, they created accents, people slamming on their brakes because they didn't want to get a ticket causing you're in collisions and things like that. But you know, you can have local governments can get bad with this, but you can shut down the state level. And if the state level allows that, then it's up to you to get some

people in your jurisdiction. They're not going to be putting in speed cameras and bed light cameras and emission cameras and license plate readers and all the rest of this stuff. You've got to fight this stuff at the local level. And the Liberals have always known this. They said, think globally, that's their global agenda, but act locally. That was a motto. It's been the

motto for sixty years. All my life, I've been hearing this, and so we need to understand what the global agenda is that they're thinking about. It's not hard to do, but we're going to stop it locally. That's where the rubber meets the road, and that's where you going to block them. As long as I said, we're going to be talking to Senator Nicey in the next hour about that. And so as we're talking about these self driving taxis, they're despised and hated wherever they are and so in San Francisco,

where they've already had situations where people have immobilized these things. In San Francisco and Austin, they've blocked traffic many times. They've all gone to the same intersection and blocked traffic there. They block emergency vehicles other things like that. People hate them. So you've had situations where they put traffic cones on them. They're not destroying the cars, they're putting traffic cone on it,

and it freaks out, It doesn't doesn't move. Made me think a little side story here of when Karen and I lived in Texas when we first got married from eighty to eighty three, and there was if you ever saw Stir Crazy with Richard Pryor and Gene Wilder, there was a rodeo there, the Huntington Rodeo. If I remember quickly, I think that's the name of the city. It's a tough penitentiary for hardened criminal. They do their executions there.

People there said when they electrocute somebody, lights get dim But so they said, at the time nineteen eighty we went to we like to go to rodeos, and we went to a rodeo up there and it was kind of interesting. They had a whole bunch of inmates that were in a caged in area of the grand stands, all wearing white. They didn't wear the striped suits if I remember correctly, though I think the people that if But it was a prison rodeo, and so the prisoners would actually participate in the rodeo.

But you had to be, you know, found to have good conduct in order to participate. And I think when we saw it, I think they dressed them up in striped suits like the you know, the stereotypical thing. But one of these events, they did different kinds of events than you would have at the other rodeos. Peter would not like this at all. What they did was they would get some wild horses out there that have not

been ridden, and they had a group. They put him in a group of four guys and so they had to saddle this wild, unbroken horse, and one of them had to ride it across the arena there to score points. And what they did to a man was one of them jumped up and grabbed the horse around the neck and bit his ear. And when they bit his ear, the horse would just freeze as long as he's biting his ear.

The horses. I'm not I don't know what's going on. I'm not moving at all, totally still, and the other guys would race to put the saddle on, and more often than not they wouldn't get it cinched up properly. So once the guy got on it start riding, the saddle would come off and he would go underneath the horse. So some horses and animals sudden and men were also injured this thing. But it was it was crazy.

It was a free for all. Whenever I think about these self driving cars and they put the cone on it, it makes me think of that rodeo. It's just the way. I don't know, it's a story. I just just springs to mind the horse that freezes there. I guess these prisoners never thought of putting a traffic cone on the horse's head. Maybe it doesn't work. Okay, So Google has the way most self driving cars, and there in San Francisco, I remember cruise As already said all right,

we're done. We had a car that, you know, woman was hit by another car. It didn't recognize that she was on the ground, and it ran over her as well and drug her for quite a distance and that was kind of the final traffic cone I guess in their saga of a cruise cars in San Francisco. But Google was still at it, and so last week they had people were celebrating China's lunar New Year, setting off fireworks.

One person jumped onto the hood of an empty Way Moe vehicle, which you know, these things are are still circulating around even though they've got nobody in them. How efficient. And so one person jumped on the hood the way Movee hicle broke its windshield. Another person then jumped on the hood thirty seconds later. Some of the people in the crowd clapped and approval. Other people were filming it. That's how they know all the details. They said.

That was when it went wild. They just got people on skateboards breaking the glass, others graffiting the car. They said, there are two groups of people, those who encourage it and those who are just shocked and filming it. You know, half of the people now anymore just you know, don't react to anything except to film it. Waymo said that someone threw fireworks inside, which set the vehicle on fire, and then being electric fire at the

electric car. It just took it the rest of the way. It was a Jaguar Eyepace equipped to with twenty nine cameras and other sensors, but I guess those were all burned beyond recognition. But it reflects a growing public hostility to all of this stuff. And that's the key thing as we look at the hostility that is rising against the global agenda, the farmers and the EU.

As Katherine Austin Fitz said Why interviewed her last she said, when they looked at twenty twenty three, an unexpected trend as they went back and looked at all the articles over the last year was pushback. People pushing back against

this agenda. And most people don't really understand how dangerous and they don't really this agenda is, and they don't really understand the full implications of it, but they're still angry about it. But the farmers, I think, know what's going on in the EU. The EU Commission now has bent the knee kind of to these protesting farmers. They said they're dropping key passages in this

proposal for a new twenty forty goal aimed at cutting greenhouse gas pollution. These people nitrogen, seriously, you want to stop nitrogen and it's not even nitrogen. In the past they've complained about nitrogen fertilizer running off into water, creating algae and other things like. That's not what this is. It's about nitrogen gas. It's about what is it about eighty percent of the atmosphere seventy or eighty percent of the atmosphere is nitrogen, and they're worried about a little bit

of nitrogen, a little bit more nitrogen going out there. It's absolutely ludicrous. It's just like CO two CO two, including man made CO two, zero point four percent of the atmosphere. That's going to make a big change. No, it's not. They are gas lighting you. Well, I tell you what if that movie hadn't come up with that term gas lighting? This all stuff about nitrogen gas and CO two gas. That is the perfect analogy for this stuff. When are they going to come for the oxygen?

That's what I want to know. The previously mandated thirty percent cut to agriclate cultural production between by twenty twenty four is now gone. They said. The revised draft also has excluded a mandate for citizens to make lifestyle changes such as eating less meat, and a push to end fossil fuel subsidies reports political well maybe and maybe not. This thing has not been passed, and some of these European bureaucrats are not fully on board of this either. Farmers protests have

broken out in many countries across Europe in recent weeks. Some of the largest demonstrations have been in Germany, prompted by a cut two diesel subsidies. The EU's planned to be presented today Tuesday, will recommend a ninety percent cut in total EU emissions by twenty twenty four, twenty forty by nineteen ninety levels. This is still crazy. When you're going to cut ninety percent of emissions, they're still going to be coming after your food and your mobility in your farm

and all the rest of this stuff. By the way, well, I'm going to get to these at the end. I've got some comments here, people talking about Valentine's Day things. But the updated version of the plan, which is still subject to change, framed agriculture in a more positive light.

They talked about food sovereignty, and as I've talked about this and the food, the farmer protests and things like that, I said, you remember these verious European countries have always heavily subsidized food and farming because they wanted to make sure that they were not dependent on other nations to feed their own people,

and so they wanted to have what they called food sovereignty. Part of that was heavily subsidizing French farmers, Dutch farmers, and all the rest is because they wanted to know that the farmers in their country could grow enough to feed

their population without relying on someone else. As a matter of fact, the Netherlands are so fertile that they are the second largest food exporterer that small country, second only to the United States. So again we're going to talk coming up with Senator Nicely there is you know, as they shut down the natural asset companies quickly and unexpectedly, he's going to talk about what happened with that At the that was a plot to essentially bring carbon credits in through the New

York Stock Exchange. They would be given public lands. Why would they turn title over to, say, the Smoky Mountain National Park? Why would they turn that over to some private corporation. What are they going to do to make it better? No, right, it's nothing, really, It's just so they can tap into that. But it also then gives them this financial construct to which they add no value whatsoever, but they get paid. This

financial construct will then be used for them to control things. And so Senator Nicely is talking about it is how they're using conservation easements, which a lot of farmers thought was going to make sure that the deal was that they were going to get some tax credits, that this is going to remain as farming land, and they were going to do certain conservation things. But now this has turned to climate and to environmentalism. That's what the bills are now before

the Tennessee legislature and before probably the legislature in your state as well. Going back to the Netherlands, our farmers deserve to be listened to, said one person in the parliament. I know that they're worried about the future of agriculture and their future as farmers. So again, let's listen to them, let's assuage their fears while we stick the knife in their back and cut everything by ninety percent. EPP environmental spokesperson said the twenty forty target for a ninety percent

cut over nineteen ninety levels. We should focus on positive opportunities for farm unless on these new instruments that rather see the farmers as an enemy of climate policy. You see, let's put them to sleep. Let's tell them that we're

going to this is going to be a positive opportunity for them. And these instruments that we got and we're talking about, you know, just like natural asset companies or doing these conservation easements or things like that, they will subtly in the background and quietly change this stuff to target you, to make you the enemy of their climate policy. One EU official tot politico really is hard to escape the fact that is, the agricultural sector could and should contribute to

climate goals. It's hard to escape reality. Well, their reality is based on these phony models. Their reality is not reality. It's not sanity either, and we need to oppose this. We cannot accept and start arguing about carbon We can't start arguing with them about levels of emission and their hypocrisy about all this stuff that is not That is the path to losing this stuff. We have to confront them on the absurdity of CO two being tied to global

warming to begin with. And so this official says, despite all the semantics, right, this is all just semantics to assuage their anger. Despite the semantics, there's an unequivocal impact assessment taking a very compelling case for ambitious headline target and for all sub targets for all sectors. So this is just a headfake. And of course when we talk about the diesel prices there are already primed to a rise really sharply this year coming to a head. Global stocks

of diesel have been declining. Why well, because of sanctions and other things like that, and lack of manufacturing capacity. And when we look at how things have been transferred, how our economy has been and our manufacturing has been transferred to China, here's a good example. Why are solar panels forty four percent cheaper in China than in the US. Well, it's protectionism, and it's the China price of slave labor, currency manipulation and things like that.

However, you'll see this that he talks about four different stages of production of these solar cells, and what is happening in terms of China establishing dominance or even a one hundred percent monopoly on these stages of production, and the way that they're able to do it, of course is because of energy. Because of energy, the last steel planets reported a couple of weeks ago. The last steel plant in the UK was in Wales shut down. Why just because

for the same reason that the German factories are shutting down. It's a highly energy intensive process to get these really high heats that they need for a steel processing and metallurgy and all the resa stuff, and so that takes a lot of energy. And European countries like the UK and Germany cannot compete with China

on that because China's got cheap energy. Why do they have cheap energy because of the Paris Climate Accord and the governments saying that they have to obey and comply with this, And so what that does is that shuts down our cheap available power and it lets the Chinese and Indian companies build more and dirtier power plants than way dirtier than anything in Europe or the US, and we shut down our cleaner power plants so they can build cheap and dirty and they wind

up getting very cheap energy. And then surprise, surprise, we can't afford to compete with them in any kind of manufacturing, not just in steel. Oh steel, that's so yesterday. Well, no, it's not. But also in solar and so they said every process of this is worth taking a closer look. This is zero hedge, and the US trails significantly in every stage of production. Four stages. The first one polysilicon. Polysilicon is a

very high purity silicon. It's ninety seven percent of the world's solar panels. That's the fundamental building block, and that is the most energy and capital intensive piece because the high temperatures and the expensive equipment used in refining. So there, like I said, just like steel, we have polysilicon raw material.

Up until two thousand and five, polysilicon manufacturing was dominated by companies from the US, Europe, and Japan. But with China's huge expansion and investment, by twenty twenty three, roughly ninety one percent of polysilicon for solar panels was produced in China. If you take something that's extremely energy intensive and you give them an advantage in the price of energy, you artificially advantage them by something

like the Paris Climate Accord. This is what happens. And again Mitch McConnell could have stood against. This was twenty fifteen during Obama, Remember Kerry and Obama said we self ratified it. That's not a thing. Everybody said that at the time, but not a single senator, as I said over and over again, not Rampaul, not Mike Lee, and certainly not Mitch McConnell, pushed back against that and called for a vote. They could have shut it down. No, this is not this is not a treaty that we're

going to go along with. And then when Trump got in, there was a fight in his administration the beginning of it. He decided that he would not get out of it. He said, all right, well I'll declare that we're out of it after the election. And so he left it there for four years. And then the day after the election or whatever, he says, well, we're out of it. And then two months later Biden puts us back into it. Nobody wants to shut it down. They're playing

games with it. He left it there for four years to help establish You know, Meanwhile, for those four years while Trump leaves it there, things are being shut down everywhere under the idea that we have to comply with this Paris agreement. So that's the first process. The polysilicon thing very heavily energy intensive, and so now ninety one percent of that is being done in China

because of the energy advantage. Then you get to the ingots and the wafers, and so what they do the next part of the process is also very energy intensive, very high temperatures. Whether it is they take that polysilicon and they make it into long rods or ingots, and then they cut them into wafers. You've seen the wafers on the solar panels, and ninety seven percent of the world's solar ingots and wafers are made in China. The US makes

none. None. So if you want to go to zero missions, you know, once you get these solar panels, this is what they're going the little bit of rationing of energy that they're going to let us have because you can't do manufacturing with solar panels on the grid if you're going to shut down the so called fossil fuels and they're not fossil fuels, that's all you know, the peak oil lies that were put out there by CIA and the oil companies to tell you those fossil fuels, there's only so much oil on the

ground, all that kind of stuff. So again Trump left that Paris thing in there, and now we got zero ingots and wafers being manufactured in the US, ninety seven percent of them made in China, just like ninety one percent of the polysilicon has made there, and the bulk of China's solar manufacturing is and provinces where electricity costs are nearly thirty percent below the global industrial average.

If you control energy, you control the economy. If you control the economy, you control the country, and you can take the country down. Folks, this is war against us. What would you say if if an enemy came in and said, well, we're not going to allow you to manufacture anything anymore. That's what our own government is doing to us. Our own government is our greatest enemy. Our own government is marching in lockstep with a global agenda, and that includes Trump. He let the Paris Climate Treaty

stand, and all the Republicans let it stand. The Democrats are open about saying all they want it. The Republicans pretend they don't want it, but they let it stand. The next part of it, sand and other materials I called a quartz. Sand is used to make special containers called crucibles for melting the silicon. Most of the world's sand used, and inget production comes

from where right here, Appalachian mountains around North Carolina and Tennessee. So we have the raw materials for this, but we ship it straight to China so they can manufacture and add the value to it. There we become a third world country. This is reverse colonialism. What are we missing? We're missing the permission to have cheap energy. We have a government that is shutting all that down. Then you manufacture the cells. This is where the silicon becomes

a device that can convert sunlight into electricity. China controls eighty percent of the solar cell market, largely because of cost advantages and energy The US currently has no solar cell manufacturers, So again, this is to make us dependent upon China and these and how do you go? How are you gonna bootstrap yourself out of this? When we shut down all of our power plants, you're going to hook up a whole bunch of solar cells to superheat. Stuff ain't

gonna happen. Finally, you get to the solar panels themselves, which is essentially an assembly process. It's the least capital intensive and it is the least energy intensive. But China still has eighty three percent of that market and the US has less than two percent, And so the same thing is true in your same kind of de industrialization. They are rapidly adding solar panels. They added the number of solar panels that they have in Europe jump by forty percent

from twenty twenty two to twenty twenty three. But of course they're all being made in China. And then you have the tariffs. Trump has been talking about sixty percent tariffs, but Biden has kept all of Trump's tariffs and he's increased them as well. So they're both talking about raising the tariffs. But as a serioheddronical points out, it's not going to level the playing field by increasing the tariffs. It's not going to level the playing field for labor costs.

They've already got slave labor. It's not going to let the playing field for electricity costs either, will it? Because of Paris. I'll always have Paris. We did because of Paris. They've got the electricity cost advantage, and electricity that is huote just like it is enslave wages. And so what that means is that we're still not going to be able to compete. It means that we are still going to be buying this stuff from China, and

they will mandate that we have to buy it from China. And when you look at adding these tariffs that Trump is talking about, he's not talking about cutting the income taxes, and the Goop's not interested in cutting the income taxes or the irs agents that Biden is adding. They're going to keep all of

that stuff. I've talked many times about how and when I was talking to Tony last week, we're talking about the fact that look, you know, having a free trade zone, you know, eliminating all internal taxation as Thomas Jefferson did, and just having the government that was very very small, very very small at the time it fit inside the Constitution on like this gargantuan monster we've got Now. By doing all of that, they eliminated internal taxation.

They had taxation at the border. They're not going to do that with these tariffs. They keep raising the terrace, and they keep raising the income taxes as well. They've got both external and internal taxes now they're not going to get rid of. It's the same type of thing we used to see with the arguments about having a national sales tax, and people say, well, okay, but you know what's going to happen. They're going to add a national sales tax and they're not going to get rid of the income tax.

Well, they're going to add these sixty percent terrace and they're going to get rid of any of the income tax stuff. No, they're going to come after us so with an army of IRS agents that's seven times bigger than it is now, and the GOP is not doing anything about it. They said we're going to do something about it, but they didn't. US can easily catch up on technohl, but it's going to lose out on every other step of the process. And both Biden and Trump are willing to do this.

Trump proposes sixty percent tariffs on China today. Biden has taken Trump's terrace and retained most of them and even expanded on them. If the US puts sixty percent terrace on China, the final costs will rise at least sixty percent. It rise more than that, and we will need much more electricity as well, but we're not going to be allowed to get it, so electricity costs will jump too. There's going to be huge inflationary pressures. We have to

end this climate gas lighting. We really do have to end this, and it's no better. When you look at the windmills. The true costs of hiding net zero are impossible to hide. A forty eight percent surge and costs of these windmill powers, windmill power plans and shows that it's not economical. It's not going to work at all. So with all this happening, even as we had the natural asset companies shut down temporarily, I think they're going

to come back. You've got Moodies rolling out a new scoring system for ESG. ESG. Environmental societal governance has been pushed by black Rock and State Street and Vanguard, these massive holding companies that have about thirty trillion dollars of assets that they control. And again, you know, just like they want to do with the natural assets, you know, Vanguard and Blackrock and all they control these companies by getting a controlling interest in them enough that they can blackmail

these people to do what they want. That's going to be the same mechanism that they will ultimately do with the natural asset companies. The same mechanisms are going to do with the conservation easements in the States and all the rest of the stuff, and so as you've got attorneys general and many states are pushing

back against this ESG thing and saying it's fundamentally fraudulent. You've got pension funds and you've got individual investors who are buying into this because they think these companies are in business to make money, but they're not. They're not. They're in business to push the government's social agenda or the government's environmental agenda, and they don't care if it causes them to lose money. And so that's fraud.

Well, now that they started pushing on that side, the new way that they're going to come back to respond to that to push the ESG is to have Moody's, which does a lot of reading of companies. Moodies Investor Services is now going to start assigning a value, a scoring system for whether or not these companies are complying with the Paris Climate Courts. It always comes back to Paris, always comes back to that this treaty that is not a

treaty, but everybody pretends that they've got to obey this treaty. Officially launched last year, the new NZAS is what they call it, provide an assessment of the strength of a companies carbon emissions reduction profile relative to the global net zero pathway that is consistent with the Paris Agreement. Always that That's why Trump's betrayal on this as well as all of the GOP was so important. Market

participants confront considerable challenges and comparing decarbonization plans. All this is about standardized ratings of Paris Climate Accord compliance. And if you want to speak out against this, we now have in Canada a member of parliament there has rolled out a bill to criminalize anybody speaking against well, not speaking against climate change, but

anybody promoting fossil fuels. And it's kind of interesting because, you know, as we had Michael Mann who came up with that fraudulent to hockey stick thing, and again we know it was fraudulent because the emails of climate Gait were being passed back and forth between Michael Mann and people in the UK's East Anglian Climate Center. They were passing emails back and forth saying, our models don't work. How do we hide the decline? Oh, Michael Mann's got a

great idea, let's do this. And so as mark Stein was poking fun at him, he said, well, that's defamation. He won a case against mark Stein and it is a tremendous loss for free speech and free press. Mark Stein, the jury said, has to pay him a million dollars. Interestingly enough, this Canadian bill would find people up to a million dollars oh and two years in prison for promoting fossil fuels, for saying that they're good, for saying that they work, for even talking about them. I

mean, think about how insane this is. Think about how stalines this is even truthful. Statements that compare relative emissions of natural gas and coal would be banned, in criminalized for the longest time. I remember back in nineteen seventy one had the first Earth Day. I was in high school, and I remember all these people look at how we have all the emissions in America,

and I said, yes, because we make everything in America. Nobody is talking about all the emissions coming out of China, now, are they, Because everything's now being made in China, just like I was talking about the soldiara, Oh, nobody is going to complain about China and India. They get a free pass and nobody even talks about it. So this is a

rep out of Northern Ontario where the Fossil Fuels Advertising Act. If you're in Canada's Bill C three seventy two prohibit the promotion of fossil fuels except in accordance with the provisions of the Act, and promotion is defined as a representation about a product or service, including any communication or information about the product or service and its price and it's distribution. Don't talk about it, it doesn't exist. Complete censorship, zip the lips, any of it that is likely to

influence or shape attitudes, beliefs, behaviors about the product or service. Look, all ads are designed to do exactly that. All ads are designed to shape your attitude, your beliefs, your behavior is about the product or the service. Right, that's what an advertisement means. Advert know, you go back to the Latin roots of that means to turn too. You're trying to turn people to your product. So no advertising of any fossil fuel products whatsoever.

And again they're not fossil fuels. That's a lie from the CIA and big oil to promote scarcity. And then to justify this in this bill, they say, you know all those Canadian wildfires, Oh, that's because of fossil fuels. No, it's not, and it's not because of climate change either. We've seen the Lake Cabin fires in Quebec. That's most of that is based on arson, the Barrington fire and Nova Scotia. The cause of

arson, it wasn't global boil. And we just had a case come to that goes back to twenty twenty one, the El Dorado fire that was out in California that was based on a gender reveal that went wrong. They had some something that had combustible stuff and that's set off a fire. You just had husband and wife. They were part of that gender reveal. They just pled guilty to involuntary manslaughter because people died from that fire. It got really

big. It had twenty three thousand acres that got burned there. But anyway, so this is where these people are on climate change, and it just continues to go because we don't have anybody, anybody in national politics who's going to even take up this mantle and talk about it. Isn't that odd an

election year. The silence, the deafening silence about this thing that is going to be used to destroy everything in our society's going to take us back to the dark ages and we don't have a single politician who is going to take up that and talk about it. We'll be right back. Elvis the Beatle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com. Using free speech to free minds, It's the David Knight Show. He feels a little chill. Can I bring him this blanket?

Sure? All right. It's sad when my mother has to speak the words that condemn her own son. But I couldn't allow them to believe that I would commit murder. They have put him away now, as I should have years ago. He was always bad, and in the end he intended to tell them I killed those girls and that man as if I could do anything except just sit and stare like one of his stuffed birds. They know I can't even move a finger, and I won't. I'll just sit here and

be quiet, just in case they do suspect me. They're probably watching me. We'll let them let them see what kind of a person I am. I'm not even gonna sweat that fly. I hope they are watching. They'll see. They'll see, and they'll know, and they'll say why she wouldn't even have a fly. Yeah, and of course that was Norman Bates. And we've got another trainy insanity psycho killer as well. This is what happened

at Joel Austin's Lakewood Church on Sunday in Houston. And interestingly enough, mainstream media and the Houston Police Department insist on calling this guy a woman. I don't know how they addressed Norman there. Yeah, missus Bates did they play along with the insanity there as well. And this one is not named Norman Bassis. One was named Jeffrey Escalante. Our shooter is identified by a driver's license as Janice Marino, thirty six years old, Hispanic female. But there

are some discrepancies, said the Houston Police Department's commander. Some discrepancies, you mean between the driver's license and the body. The body. You've got a body here. If these people can't conduct their investigation to see what gender, sex and gender and sex are the same thing, they can't conduct an investigation to see they're so confused and confusing everybody else. And of course the media is having a field day with that. We do have reports she this is

a Houston Police department. We do have reports she used multiple aliases, including Jeffrey Escalante. So she has utilized both male and female names. But through all of our investigation to this point, talking with individuals, interviews, documents, Houston Police Department reports, she has been identified this entire time as female. Are they afraid to dead name this corpse? This is just beyond absurdity, the fact that our police and the media and the government will all play

along with this. And I told Karen this. At first, I didn't cover this because, you know, they were saying, well, it looks like a female shooter somewhere between the age of thirty and thirty five. There was no name or any identification, they said, and there was a we think that when she was accompanied, she was in a trench coat with a long rifle. They said, a companied brought in a five year old child.

A five year old child has been hit. They didn't even wouldn't say at the time whether the child was the same child that she brought in. So I was like, I'm not going to talk about it. But I told Karen, I said, that's a training killer. That's a training killer coming after church again, just like the one in Nashville. And look at all the hoops that they jump through to keep that stuff quiet. And now it turns out that yes, it is that same child that she brought in.

A child is seven years old, not five years old. So a lot of this stuff changes as they go through some and it's interesting to see what different organizations focus on because we have somebody who's absolutely as a nutbag psycho killer like Norman Bates. But of course there was also a Palestinian sticker on the butt of the gun, so some media has focused on that made that the focus of their reports. Some people have focused on the criminal record of

this person who has a very, very long rap sheet. Some people have focused on the fact that this is an immigrant, perhaps an illegal immigrant from El Salvador. People focused on that. Of course, the New York Times focused on the fact that the killer was carrying an AR fifteen, because all the rest of that stuff, the insanity, the illegal aliens and the open borders, the racism, the hatred for Jews as well as Christians, none of that matters. It's the AR fifteen, that's the thing we need to

focus on. According to the New York Times, it's absolutely crazy. Let me respond to some of the comments and tips here. I was going to do that before I went to break and then I'll get back to this. On rock Fan, David Blackburn, thank you very much for the tip, he says, God bless David, Well, thank you. That is a

blessing. All of you appreciate your tips. On rock Fan, Nancy Chambers says, my husband asked me to marry him the day after we met, married five weeks later, and we were happily married for fifty eight and a half years until the vaccine killed him. I'm so sorry, but it is a blessing to have that you had fifty eight and a half years, and that is a blessing, and I hope that you'll be reunited with him as

well. Rockfinn Andy said, I experimented for a little while using the term genetic code injection the GCI when reporting if my patient took the JAB or not. Nobody ever kicked my paperwork back. That's right, that's good, that's good. I like that handy. On Rumble, Heather Ram twenty nine, thank you for the tip, says thank you so much. From Ontario, Canada, where they're trying to censor any talk at all about fossil fuels that's

coming out of Ontario. You're beagon in the darkness. Well, thank you, And if these people get their way, that will quite literally be literally be in the darkness, literally in the darkness, in the silence. The sound of Silence on rock fan Jason Barker good to see, He says, I have forty five acres mostly wooded. Can I get paid for scrubbing CO

two? Oh? No? Bill Gates wants to come out and cut trees down because he said, you know, they're a fire hazard, and you know when they die, they're going to release all that CO two that they've captured. So we've got to cut them down and bury them. Not make anything useful out of it, but cut them down and bury them. That's

where these people are headed. Be getting back to this shooting though much to say so a seven year old child when she pulls up, they said she opened up the door, pulled out a seven year old and out of the back seat as well as the bag, confronted a security guard who let her in along the west side of the building. So I'm not sure that confronted. They don't say where that was a threat with a gun or something,

or if she just you know, let me in. I don't know what the deal was, and I am saying she, it's not a she, it's a guy. Then he this guy addresses a woman immediately starts firing after entering the hallway of the church off duty officers who are working approved security jobs for the church. And again, what's a lesson about this is how you protect your schools as well. If you're going to have soft targets where there's a lot of people, most of them unarmed, you do need to have

hired security. And it's even better if you've got people that are carrying that are identified by a uniform engaged. They engaged him in a gunfight. He and the child are brought down in a hail of bullets. The child was shot once in the head. They don't know who shot the child because there were two different groups of They've evidently had a lot of security there. It's a big church. They got like thirty thousand people there and lots and lots

of money in the hallway. Multiple shots were exchanged by all three. She they say she eventually a guy. That's a guy. The seven year old child falls to the ground as well from gunfire. One gun shot wound to the head, so again. This what is disturbing to me about this as well. I'm reading to you there's many different accounts I could have read to you from, but they went through the blow by blow here more on the

Christianpost dot com. And yet the Christianpost dot com is using the killer's preferred pronouns. They're afraid to dead name this killer. The child remains the critical condition of the hospital. Two weapons were discovered from the scene, a twenty two caliber rifle which was not used, and an AR fifteen with a Palestine sticker on it on the butt of the stock, the butt stock there. We do believe that she does have a mental health history, said the Houston

police officers. Well, these guys our geniuses, aren't they inspector lestrides. I mean, you know, this is a tranny who's a man dressed up as a woman. Yeah, well you think this person's got a mental health history? Yeah, wearing it all over there. We do believe there was a familiaral dispute that has taken place between her ex husband and her ex husband's family, some of whom are Jewish, so we believe that might have possibly

been where this stems from. Isn't that interesting? This person goes to a church and sets it up, and they're going to portray it as anti Semitism. I don't know what's going on with that, but I guess you know, if you're going to talk about a hate crime, it's okay to hate Christians. But if they find a Palestine sticker on the gun indicating that they

the killer hates Jews as well, then I don't know. So as you look at this, as I said the training, insanity is everywhere, including the fact that we're going to focus on the Palestine stickers, on the fact that they're there to kill people in the church. You have a World at Daily WND says it was political. You have others that say it was anti Semitic, and of course the New York Times ignores all the immigration, all the criminal records, all the politics of this person and focuses on the AR

fifteen. We don't understand why these things happen, Sat Joel Ostein, but we know that God is in control. This is a guy who sells a prosperity gospel. When bad things happen, he doesn't have an answer for that. He's a mister smiley face. Prosperity gospel. Why do bad things happen to good people? He has no answer for that. He says, we're going to stay strong, We're going to continue to move forward. There are forces of evil, but there are forces that are for us. The forces

of God are stronger than that. Well, that's true, but that's not the whole truth. And he misses a great deal of that truth. And so you know, when we were talking about this with my sons and with Karen, it was very interesting. You know this again, this individual a crazy Norman Bates type of person, a documentary history of arrest and mental illness, an illegal alien, all the rest of stuff. But I, as we're talking about it, my son said, I don't think that was the

most dangerous person in the church that day. Maybe the most dangerous person in the church that day was Joel lostein Phoenix, Arizona. Hello, Hello, Larry, You're the best, and thank you Joel for your positive messages and your book. I'm wondering, though, why you signed tip Larry's earlier question about how we get to heaven. The Bible clearly tells us that Jesus is the way, the truth and the light and the only way to the fathers

through him. That's not really a message of condemnation. Truth. Yeah, I would agree with her. I believe that. No, Well, here's my thing there is. I can't judge somebody's heart, you know, I don't know. Only God can look at somebody's heart. And so I don't know. I just to me, it's not my business to say, you know, this one is or this one isn't. I'm just saying, here's what the Bible teaches. And I want to put my faith in, uh,

you know, in Christ. And I just I think it's wrong when we go around saying, you know, you're not going, you're not going, You're not going because it's not exactly my way. I'm just I'm not going to be believe. I believe my way. I believe my way with all my heart. But doesn't share it. Well, he is wrong, and well, I don't know. If I look at it like that, I would, I would present my way. But I'm just gonna let God be the judge of that. And I don't know, I don't know.

So you make no judgment on anyone. No, but I as no, I just you know what, I let I let somebody, Let let God be the judge who goes to heaven and Hell, and I just again, I present the truth and I say it every week. You know, I believe it's a relationship with Jesus. But you know what, I'm not going to go around telling everybody else. If they don't want to believe that, that's going to be their choice. God's got to look at your own heart.

God's got to look at your heart. And only God knows that you believe there's a place called heaven. Mind. God is not in the condemning business. He's in the restoration business. His sermons are relentlessly positive, and that's made him a target of critics who say Ostine sometimes sounds less like a preacher and more like a motivational speaker. You have to take the hand you've been dealed and make the most of it. You know, you've been criticized

for church light. Yeah, that's right for a cotton candy message. Do you feel like you're cheating people by not telling them about the hell part? I really don't, because it's a different approach. You know, it's not hellfire and brimstone. But I say most people are beaten down enough by life they already feel guilty enough, well, you know, it's kind of interesting. Was and of course that's a famous clip where he's on with Larry King,

and he had many other things to say. But when the caller comes in and quotes him what Jesus had to say, this is what it is an offense to people with Christianity. When Jesus said I am the Way. You didn't say I'm a way. He said I am the way. And then he says, no one can come to the Father except through me, and so no one the way and except through me. Those are all very exclusive. And that's the thing that is so offensive to everybody about Christianity,

that exclusivity. But if you don't believe what Jesus says, don't call yourself a Christian, Joel, when you are shamed of the gospel, you're shamed. You don't want to offend anybody. Why because you're making millions of dollars you got you bought a basketball arena, and you just retired that one hundred million dollar debt. He is selling the spirit of the time, the spirit of the time that says we're not going to judge anything that anybody does.

We're not going to set up any standard for anything that anybody does that is not a loving thing. You know, back when I was in school, people talk about the Great Awakening that was a precursor to the American Revolution, and at center of it was a piece by Jonathan Edwards Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God that sounds like a real condemning piece, and he talks about the fact that at any moment our foot might slide and we might fall

into this pit of eternity? Are we righte with God? At that point? And Jonathan Edwards didn't scare people into a Great Awakening as much as he offered out the idea that God is offering something better for you. He is offering and the fact that God's mercy and grace is being extended to you. He says, you know, you could be dead already except that God has given you more time. Are you going to thumb your nose at this mercy of God? Because if you do, there is a massive condemnation that to

wait for you. That is not judging people. That is saying what Christ said, and that is if you believe what Christ said. Isn't it loving to tell people to try to avoid the worst thing that can happen. That's why my son said whistler. I said, well, I think the most dangerous person at that church was not the shooter, but Joelosity. Because Jesus said, don't fear those who can destroy the body, but destroy, but fear him who can destroy the body and cast the soul into eternal hell.

That's what you should be afraid of. The training shooters should be afraid of God. You should be afraid of a God whose wrath has not been appeased by Jesus's sacrifice. And that's the key thing. And when you offer that, that's a free offer for anybody who wants to take advantage of that. And we do all stand condemned. He says, well, I don't want to. We're all you know, everybody's feeling like you know, there's certain things that they need to do. And then he starts talking about well it

could be better, parents, they could be better. No, we're all in rebellion to God, in rebellion to God. How does it get any worse than that? And so what do we do about that? Well, fortunately God has provided Jesus to take away our sins and to give us his righteousness, and so we can offer our lives then to him, and the

things that we do are now acceptable that would not be acceptable. I mean, like sacrificing an unclean animal or some kind of a weird thing on the altar if we didn't do it. And that's what he's calling people to do. He's calling people to do something that God never called them to do. And as far as the obedience goes, as Jesus said, you know when he was very merciful to people again, he gave his life for people, but he said, if you love me, keep my commandments. He would.

He would engage people, but he would not leave them the way that they were, and so he would give them the power to change their lives. He would give them the power to change their relationship with God and that God would change what they want out of life rather than being focused on prosperity or your best life now, which is what made Joel Austein famous. We had Super Bowl ads that twenty eight million dollars worth of Christian ads for the

Super Bowl. He Gets Us was one of these. And then Mark Wahlberg has got a Catholic meditation app telling people to get prayed up. I don't know. I didn't look at this Catholic prayer app. Hello, But I don't know how did people pray before they had an iPhone? If we need an app to pray, maybe we don't. Maybe this is just something to kind of encourage you to do it. I don't know. But the thing

I wanted to focus on was the He gets Us ad. By the way Wahlberg's company raised the people that's with Hallow the app, they raised fifty million dollars. The Heat gets Us thing is getting its money from the hobby lobby billionaire who is funding that the hellow app from Mark Wahlberg. Interestingly enough, the CEO's name is Alex Jones, and they point out that that is not info war is Alex Jones. They raised one hundred and five million dollars in

funding, a lot of that going for this app. I guess maybe this Alex Jones could call it maybe stop kneel, you take out my app and pray instead of a kneeling to pray. I don't know how how people got along in the past without having an app, but anyway, the point of that was to get more people to pray. He gets Us campaign though, and said, well, we're just trying to reintroduce people to the Jesus of the Bible. Now what they're trying to do is reinvent the Jesus of the

Bible. Maybe we could call their movement to stop the kneel and kneel to each other, because the whole thing is a bunch of it looks like a bunch of AI generated artwork. But they paid a fortune to a photographer to

actually take those pictures. And that's one of the issues of this. You know, when people have this money that's been given to them because it's a Christian organization and they want to, you know, push people in that direction, people kind of wonder, well, what are you using the money for,

you using it wisely or you're just kind of throwing it away. Well, appears like they were just kind of throwing it away, spending massive amounts of money on this these these still photographs, and then it's the content of the photographs as well. They ran two ads. One of them was called foot washing, a modern take on the biblical story of Jesus washing the twelve

apostles feet to tell them to serve each other. That was one of the things that people were saying, Well, you didn't quite get that right. But primarily it is a man centered message, not a God sented message that you're seeing from He gets us. So you got a policeman kneeling before a black man. How many times we've seen that, right, We know where these people are coming from. Politically, you got a protester before a woman

who is visiting a family planning clinic. You've got a white woman kneeling to a migrant mother and washing her feet, and so that's their their commercial. A little bit of it for you here. We're not going to play a whole lot of it. But here's what it looks like. A still picture that they're zooming in on. It's a police officer washing the feet of a black guy in an alley, and that's in the school. Here's some you know, an Indian having his feet washed by a European man family planning clinic.

There you go. So it's just a bunch of I don't know why they think that's going to be effective at changing anybody's life. Again, what changes your life is to understand that you have a relationship with God, that you have eternal life, that your sins have been forgiven, that you are now free to Your past has been removed from you, but you're free now to obey God. That's not going to be perfect, but you're always going

to be forgiven as long as that is your goal to do this. They don't have anything about the gods, so they say, well he gets us, Well do they get God? I don't know. Have they even read his message? It ended with a slogan, Jesus didn't teach hate, he washed feet. How would our contentious world change if people, especially those with opposing ideologies, took off their shoes and washed each other's feet. So what we're seeing here this is simply the social gospel of the left, always about

man to man, never about man to God. What about my relationship with God? I don't worry about it. You know He's He's going to not judge you for anything. Well, that's not the message of the Bible. Message of the Bible is that we stand condemned before God unless we do something with our sin. A second, fifteen second advertisement, who is My Neighbor shows a homeless man and a man working in a shop and asked what if we treated them accordingly? Again, it's all about man to man stuff.

Well, Manda man stuff is great, but the Manda Man stuff is going to They're putting the cart before the horse. You're not really going to be able to get that done properly unless you have already taken unless you've got a

different basis for this. When I talk about doing social change and having the guts to stand up to something even if you know that it's going to destroy your life, maybe even take your life, that's because you've got a fulcrum point, that is, outside of this life, you have a different perspective on things. And I think that's true even when you're talking about social issues

like this. So they said they expected that these two ads together could have cost them seventeen and a half million dollars before looking at the cost of hiring actors and production and again their production costs. They had to get some special photographer to make this stuff look like it was AI generated. The AI images

were free. One of your wrote and said, you do realize that Jesus is the one I've known all my life would not approve of commercialized glorification super Bowl commercials costing millions of dollars money that could be used to actually help those in need. You want to wash somebody's feet. You want to help your fellow man, Fine, don't waste twenty million dollars on an ad you want

to talk about. Well, look, here's somebody in front of a family planning clinic and you know you're you're washing the feet of this pregnant woman who was thinking about getting an abortion. We'll take that twenty million dollars. How many how many of the four d ultrasound imaging machines could you scatter around the country at these crisis pregnancy centers for twenty million dollars. Nothing that they say they support. Even if they're going to be focused on the social gospel,

they're not even doing the social gospel. They're doing Super Bowl commercials. They're building up their organization. They continued. Let us be clear in our opinion, Jesus loves gay people and Jesus loves trans people. Yes, he loved them enough to die for their sins, and he loved them enough to give them the power to change their lives. And then he said, if you love me, you will keep my commandments. And it's pretty clear these people

want to normalize what Jesus says is not normal. So they could have focused on the pro life aspects of this as well, but of course they didn't. And so you have a pro life organization that did talk about this. This is the Live Action dot Org. They said. You know, even though you've got this Super Bowl ad talking about well, we should love other people, we should serve other people, we should do it with humility, they said, you know, this is what the pro life movement does every

day, they said. One of the scenarios in the ad was a young woman sitting on a bench in front of a building label Family Plan clinic while another woman washes her feet. In the background, a group of what appears to be pro lifers stand holding signs. The pro lifers do not appear to be hostile or angry, and their signs are not threatening, and as they

pointed out, you know this is abortion. Activists frequently denigrate the pro life movement by accusing them of being hate filled misogynists who want control to control women and to force them to breed, but in reality, the abortion industry itself has consistently failed women. The pro life movement serves women daily with love and humility. For pregnant mothers, resources from pro life groups abound from maternity homes

that give women a safe shelter to on campus resources. And again, when we look at all this stuff, you want to help the homeless, you want to help people have crisis pregnancies and all the rest of the stuff. They could have spent some of this money on that. Instead they wasted it on this safe nothing add Just can't we just love everybody and give everybody hugs. That is not the basis for changing our society. They really don't have

any basis for people doing that. What changes our behavior, what changes our heart? There's Christ that changes our heart, changes what we want out of life, changes us from being lovers of self. That takes a transformation. That's not something you're going to jin up and it's not something you're going to even understand. Listening to a pastor who's all about smiles and prosperity. We'll

be right back. If you like the Eagles on the cars and Huey Lewis and the news, they say ther you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen now at apsradio dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Yesterday I played for your clip over the weekend. President Trump talking about how tough he talked to the NATO countries, He said, well, you need to pay your fair share, and if you don't pay your fair share two percent of your GDP, I don't think we

should come to rescue you if you're attacked by Russia. As a matter of fact, I would encourage Russia to attack you. He said, that encourage Russia to attack you. Well, that created a lot of pushback. You had a lot of pearl clutching from GOP and from Democrats. You know, for the most part his base people in America don't want entangling alliances. So I didn't really care about what he had to say in terms of coming to

people's rescue. We don't like NATO because, as Pat Buchanan pointed out, we got trip wires all over the globe that require us to come to the rescue of people. But of course we don't wait for that. We start wars preemptively. Don't we wait for somebody to attack us. We'll attack them first. But it was all just blustering from Trump. He did nothing of

the sort I said. When I talked about it, I said, well, you know, you look at this one way that you could understand this is that maybe this is a fundraising drive to precede the Ukraine War, which everybody knew was coming. Right Poutin knew it was coming. Anybody who watched what NATO had done after the fall of Soviet Union knew it was coming.

As a matter of fact, I've played for you in the past. Arrestovich, who was Zelenski, was elected on a campaign of stopping the war that had been going on at that point in time for five years after the coup. For five years after the coup, the Ukrainian government that was installed by the CIA had shelled civilian areas in the eastern part of Ukraine, bordering the people who wanted to remain with the Soviet Union. It's been bombing civilian towns

for five years and they wanted peace. Everybody wanted peace, and so that's what Zelensky ran on. And then he sends this guy, Alexey Arrestovich as the peace envoy, and he was interviewed by the local Ukrainian media and they said, so, what are the chances of peace happening? Is none? None. As a matter of fact, he said in twenty nineteen, it's going to get worse. He said in twenty twenty two, Russia's going to invade, and he said it's going to be full on wars. She said

that's horrible, and he goes, no, that's good. He could well. He said they're going to invade and Ukraine will be devastated. He used a more comprehensive word, not annihilated, but you know, demolished. She said that's horrible. He goes, no, that's good. We'll get into NATO. They knew it was coming. Both sides knew this was coming for a long time. And so, you know, was Trump far from He

didn't get out of NATO. You know, his base thought of him as getting out of NATO, just like his base thought of him as being anti vaccine. His base thought of him as being pro wall and all the rest of this stuff. Maybe he was just pushing it up, but somebody looked at actually the what the European nations are contributing. After Trump had his tough talk with him and told them to pay up and pay their fair share? Are they paying their fair share? No, only a third of them are

paying their fair share. So he did and get them. He didn't do anything. Again, this is his imaginary presidency, just like his imaginary building of the wall that didn't happen, which is why we've got one of the reasons why we've got the mess of the border. But again, I don't think that the border mess is going to be solved strictly by interdiction or by border patrols. It's necessary to have some of that stuff there, but it's

not going to be solved by that. It's the welfare magnet that's bringing people in. It's the policies that say, come in and we'll give you everything, including the right to vote. We'll give you unemployment checks, will give you free medical care, we'll give you free welfare. Just come on in. You don't have to ask permission at all. Anybody who wants to come in can come in. That's what's creating the crisis. And unless you stop

that welfare magnet, nothing is going to do anything about it. But getting back to this statistic is Katrina Bukoltz. So the goal of two percent of GDP and military spending that NATO has set for itself was not reached in many of the European countries as of mid twenty twenty three, even though some improvements have been made especially in Eastern sup NATO members Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia are

also planning to fortify their Russian border with bunkers. Oh so they're gonna do something about their borders, and oh, do you think that's going to be effective? You're gonna put bunkers there. Do you remember when France did that after World War One? They created the imagino line. We got invaded by Germany before. So we're gonna set up these bunkers and we're gonna have guns in them, and we're going to stop the Germans from invading us again.

We just flew over them and attacked them from behind. They could turn their guns around. It's ridiculous. I think that you're going to stop them with these bunker things there. Again imagine o line mentality. But it is an imaginary defense, right, just like the imagine just like Trump imagined building the wall, just like Trump imagined getting NATO to pony up the money for their own defense instead of charging us for it. The concept that NATO country should

spend two percent of their GDP on defense was debuted in twenty fourteen. Well, the definition has agreed upon during NATO's Whales Summit ten years ago is vague. The two percent target has nevertheless been considered a hallmark of NATO's success as well as a point of contention and of public discourse. Again, what else happened in twenty fourteen? That was the year that we had the coup. So as they have the coup, they're pushing for this two percent. Okay,

we're we started a coup in Ukraine. That's a precursor to a war. We want you guys to build up your defenses. Well they did a little bit, but not much, so let's hector them with Trump. Still they don't do anything. Still, only a third of them are doing it. But it's tied back to the fact that NATO wants to have a prolonged war with Ukraine. That's why they're pushing this two percent stuff. Again,

Trump is not anti NATO. He's pushing the NATO agenda, just like he pushes the globalist agenda for the World Health Organization, for the pandemic stuff, for all the rest of this stuff. He's pushing the globe agenda. Meanwhile, if you look at this bill, jd. Vance, the new senator, says that there is an impeachment time bomb that is aimed at Trump and the Ukraine Aid bill. That's what they care about. They don't care about

forever war. They don't care about getting us involved in a war. You know, there's some stuff in here that if Trump, you know, in this bill, there's some things that Trump did in his first administration that if he were to do them again, they could say they wanted to impeach Trump for this. That's all they care about. They don't care about war. They don't care about our death. They don't care about the violation of the constitution, the murder of people with the Trump poison. They did nothing.

The GOP did nothing about any of that. Instead, Oh, this could hurt Trump, This could be a trap for Trump. Let's pay attention to that, right, that's all they care about. It is only as Trump and Trump only, that's the only thing that any of these people pay any attention to. Well, Nikki Haley, it's paying attention to Trump again. The stupid remarks that he made, as I said, criticizing her always add hominem attacks against everybody angry about about her disloyalty to him as he perceives it.

Now, he's the king, How dare her run against me? As a king, and she came tomorrowl ago. She said she wasn't going to run all the rest of this stuff, And now where's your husband? Where's your husband? He's gone, He's gone. Where did he go? He's gone. Well, he's been deployed. As I said, this was first of all, it's projection, because everybody was asking where's Millennia. Where's Millennia, you know, for the last six to nine months, where's Milania.

She finally just showed up after being absent all that time. And so now he's got to project that onto NICKI, Oh, you must have a messed up marriage like I do. Well, maybe she does, but he's in military deployment. And so she hit back pretty hard against Trump because it was a very foolish, stupid line of criticism. Does he not know She hasn't made any secret of it. She's talked about his being in the military as a badge of honor for quite some time. So he doesn't have anybody his

organization that knows that he doesn't know anything about her. So she hit back and said, he showed that kind of disrespect for the military. He's not qualified to be president of the United States. I don't trust him to protect them. Do you trust her to protect the military. She wants to send them off to die everywhere, and wars that have not been not been proclaimed or legitimately started. She said, this was not a slip of the tongue

for Trump. When he goes off of his teleprompter, that's him speaking from the heart, and it's a pattern. She brought up other examples of Trump calling military members suckers and losers. According to his former chief of staff John Kelly, he disparaged comments that he said to have made while visiting Arlington National Cemetery losers, people in wheelchairs, people who are prisoners. Now they're losers.

We don't want to talk about them. And twenty twenty, Haley praised Trump's record toward the military and defended him when then candidate Joe Biden tweeted a video citing the losers and suckers remark. But now she was on the other foot. Now she is going to after she defended that conduct, now she is going to call it out, she said. At the time, all of us who worked with Trump witnessed the tremendous amount of love and respect he

has for a military. But now she's got a different story. She cannot be trusted either. But she says, anyone who will put down members of the military, anybody who will say that while they're deployed, which is pretty disgusting. Do you really want that kind of person being the leader of all those who may have to go fight in a war. He's already put out

global demicide with his poisonous shots. You want to talk about that, Nikki, You want to talk And I call her Nuki because there's an a war that she doesn't want to start, and she wants to She'll be fine with a nuclear war. She doesn't want to limit the killing just to the military. She wants to involve us as civilians as well. It's unbelievable the projection of both of them. He projects as marital problems under her family. She

projects her desire to kill everybody under him. What a pair? Got a great choice, can't we? She said that. Actually, Trump's press secretary came back said she advocates for greater foreign intervention. Kill them all, and she supports endless wars. It would leave more American heroes dead. It's a good thing. She will never be commander in chief. Look, they all treat all of us as non essential, as deplorable, as expendable. They

treat us all as animals. Hillary calls us deplorable. Trump called us non They all want to send us to wars. Meanwhile, you see it as Trump is pushing out at Romney's niece for not being loyal enough. He wants to put in his own daughter. And then we have RFK Junior, who ran the Super Bowl ad, is now apologizing it for it. It's a nineteen sixties ad for JFK, but they changed JFK's picture, exchanged it for RFK Junior. Gives you an idea just how bad the commercials were sixty four

years ago. You want a man for president who's season threw and threw, a man who's old enough to know a long up to do well, it's up to you. It's up to you. It's strictly up to you. American Value twenty twenty four is responsible for the contents of this advertisement. Old enough to know and young enough to do to do what Again, It was a problem then, just as it's problem now. He is after he tweeted that out, he said, well, that was a political action committee.

I didn't have anything to do with that. I'm sorry to all my angry Kennedy's, who are Kennedy relatives who are very angry at me for using my uncle. So he's apologizing profusely. I'm so sorry if the Super Bowl ad caused anyone in my family pain. After he tweeted it out on X, he says on X the ad was created and aired by the American Values super pac without any involvement or approval from my campaign. FBC rules prohibit super packs from consulting with me or my staff. I love you all, God bless

you. And of course those rules that prevent packs from coordinating with the candidates. One of the reasons why the Democrats are starting this lawfair against him. They said, well, you got a pack that has raised fifteen million dollars to get you on the ballot everywhere, an astronomical figure if you stop and think about it. But he just dropped seven million dollars on an ad one thirty second ad. It's absurd that you'd have to pay fifteen million dollars to

collect signatures across the country. And of course Shivaya Durey was talking about that and the fact he's got big donors that are going to do that for him, But now the Democrat Party is going to sue him as well, So you're gonna have to get some more millions in order to run this is It is a scam. Everything about it, this election, focusing on presidential elections is truly a scam. Majority rate Biden's mind poorly. But they say Kamala

Harris is not the answer because she's in La La Land as well. Well, you know what the answer is that if we don't want to focus on politics at all. As a matter of fact, Caitlin Johnstone out of Australia. So it's when all Americans finally realize that it doesn't matter who the president is. Oh, I hear you out there. You're screaming at the radio right now, right You're saying you're crazy. It doesn't matter who the president

is. No, it doesn't. Actually, there's an evil cabal in Washington, d C. That's been running this country since at least the JFK assassination, if not four, and they're bent on the destruction of American liberty, American society, American culture. They want to keep America somewhat as a power for the military industrial base. But whether after is global governance, and that means that they've got to keep us in line as well. Caitlin Johnstone said,

the president's brain doesn't work. It's shot. The leader of the free world lol is rusted gray matter like Swiss cheese. Anybody could hold that office and it's not meaningful. The fact that the US president has dementia exposes the uncomfortable truth of the functioning of the empires, too important to be left to

the hands of voters. The globe spanning power structure, she says, that is centralized around the United States, is not run by an official, elected government of that nation, but by unelected empire managers who filter in and out of each administration and maintain a steady presence in a government and government agencies and

government adjacent institutions. These empire managers, from alliances with corporate powers and working relations with many nations assets and partners, function as an undeclared US empire, which means there's not really any way for Americans to vote their way out of

this mess. If you've got a problem with genocide, militarism, economic injustice, authoritarianism, or any other critical building blocks of the US centralized power structure, you'll never be permitted to have influence over those things, not as voters.

We've got to stop hanging our hopes on the electoral system first. Every four years we see American attention get sucked up into this empty puppet show about which Solace Empire manager should be the temporary official figurehead at the front desk of the permanent imperial machine. And if you want to vote, by all means, go ahead and vote, but don't let that performative ritual distract you from a real project to wake up our fellow humans and to be enforcing real change.

And we do that at the local level. And that's what we're going to talk to Senator nice about when we come back real quickly. I want to thank dj and Ohio. Thank you for the tip, says Dka. Brings discerning words to our present times, addresses Truman's how's it going to end? Keep looking to and exalting the Lord Jesus, the author and finisher of our faith. Amen to that. Well, we're going to be right back with Senator Nicely, who is going to We're going to talk about things that

are going to be happening that you can do something about. At the local level, because the global agenda is going to be implemented at the local level, or it's going to be stopped at the local level. If you like the Eagles on the Cars and Huey Lewis and the news, they say the You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen

now at apsradio dot com. Joining us now is Tennessee Senator Frank Nicely, And of course he's been on the show many times warning people about what is happening with cbdc's trying to establish a goal depository some other things in case we have a financial problem which seems to be building on the horizon, how do we keep things going at the state level. And this is a problem that is several states surfaced with. This is not something that's just Tennessee, and

it's also a solution that many states are trying. But we wanted to talk to him today about natural asset companies and we talked about this about a month or so ago. It was up for approval with the SEC. The Newark Stock Exchange was part of one of the three big sponsors for this. They pulled out at the last minute. And we'll talk a little bit about why

that happened. But I said at the time, I think this thing is going to come back, and it looks like they were perhaps laying some foundation for how they were going to take over private and public land, and that is now being passed around in a lot of different states, and so you're going to see this type of bill very much like we saw CBDC legislation via

the UCC, the Uniform Commercial Code legislation and all these different states. We're seeing this type of legislation that may be in your state as well, even if you're not in Tennessee. We're going to talk about some of the specifics in Tennessee, but also how you can identify this another state. So joining us now is Senator Frank nicely. Thank you for joining us, sir, Hey time, David. It's all the ways pleasing. It was very surprising

to see this thing disappear abruptly. It looked like it was going to go through. They quietly put it in back in twenty twenty one, and then there was some pushback from some organizations and so they they delayed the SEC approval. But it wasn't the SEC not approving it. The New York psych Exchange pulled out. What do you know about that and what happened with that? Well, the word on the street is that the New York shows Change is

owned by an international group. I see the three initials that came to America, I e. G. Maybe is that because that was one of the groups? Yeah, that all talk change. But the couple that owns that, the guy used to be a US center and he and his wife for big hunters, and at the last minute he realized that he was not going to be able to hunt on any of this land, and he pulled it and he pulled out. Now they'll probably give him some kind of special hunting

for bed and come back later. But see, this is all coming from from the United Nations. You know, years ago we had the Agenda two thousand and then Agenda twenty twenty, Agenda twenty thirty. Well, they want the govers Biden talked about thirty to thirty. They want to control thirty percent of the land in America by two thousand and thirty. They want to control fifty percent of the land by two thousand and fifty. And so how do

you control the land? Well, I don't know how they did in Europe, but somehow in Europe and Midland France, they got control of the land. I don't know the mechanism they used over there, but the farmers over there are are riding as the cloud up roads, burning buildings all across Europe. You don't the mainstream press went print it. We've got to go to TikTok find out a how bad it is. But then the park over there about had it. You know, they send it all that money to Ukraine.

But they're cutting the dicel fuel and they're sticks and how much nitrogen they can use paracher and you know they're telling me they can't have a cattle on the land because of climate change, which is all ridiculous. I mean, the cattle will save the world, not destroyed world. Cattle are very beneficial to the land to top soul microorganism. To my pro Bold and the Sault,

it's all improved by cattle. The hoof action restorers the prairies on the side note where they fenced off the prairie out rest keep the buffalo and the cattle off it all die. Yeah, takes that they keep the prairie alive. Yes, But the doned nations they've been trying for years to do this, and the first time twenty something years ago, up Or, a coal miner, told me about it. He said, Frank, they're trying to turn Tennessee up to Kentucky and Virginia into wild lands and call the Wildlands project

wildlands or lands at the United Nations. They don't want any human footprint, only animals, and then they'll have these corridors. You know, for a lot of us I talk about corridors. Well, these animals could get in this corridor and go to another wild lands, and it's all sounded crazy to me, but I did remember it. And then years a few years later, I had a guy the named a Henry Lamb. He was the smartest man I ever saw on United Nations and what they're they trying to do.

I was chirmed to ad Commedian house and I didn't come in and tell us, And he said at the time he basically told us what plan was, but it was so new and crazy we didn't really know how to even think about it. But I do remember him saying that the only thing worse than you having your land taken by the government, confiscated and you condemned, the only thing worse than that is to go into a partnership on a conservation easement. He said, don't everation ease. But well, now we're beginning to

realize why. See they've changed and the wording and the farm bill, Uh, regard to these counturvations. It used to be about top and erosion and heap and production. Now it's about climate change. It's all about climate change. Yeah, the Governor's bills. I don't know if I'd like to think the governor does need to realize what these fields do, because I'd really i'd feel better about him if he didn't really understand it. But let's talk about

this. There's two different bills and uh. There so there's two bills in the Senate. There's two bills in the House here in Tennessee. Uh. Both of them have been brought by the governor. So they're being brought forward by the leadership in both houses. And so that's a lot of prestige and pressure put on your fellow lawmakers there. You got something that's coming from the

governor and pushed by you know, the leader and their legislative body. And uh, there's two bills in each in the Senate, and two bills in the House, because one of them is about public lands and the other one is about private lands, and you begin to talk about the private lands of the conservation easements, and I want to get back to that, but let's begin by talking a little bit about what these bills would do in terms of

public lands. Well, Senate Bill twenty sixty nine is relative to the management of State fars, and that's the one that would that would turn over the management of all our state forests over to these nacs. So they would have control of voliver national parks or National forsh or Bureau of Land manage the land and all the national stuff. This would facilitate turning over our state forests and state parks over to be managed by the high bidder on Wall Street. Wendays

nacs come back, and they will, they'll be back. They get over to the high bidder now and so they securitize this stuff in the same way that they always come up with these new scams and you know, get these things. Twenty body takes a look at it, like theither of the securitized mortgages back in the early two thousands that blew up in the mid two thousands, and so this is a way, as we talked about before when this was up the naturalizset companies, is a way for them to essentially securitize this

property. They can make money off of global carbon taxes, but it also gives them control over the land and by doing that they can shut this all down as the un has been planning to do for quite some time. As you just pointed out, right, Yeah, you did a great job exprain it. Then other bill send it Bill twenty ninety nine is the one that deals with the private land. I guess what we've got to do, David, is we've just got to make use landowners. And I've seen it time

after time. I've had a family member but their the land in the contrace agent with me tell them not to, but they believe that it's going to be protected forever and be able to farm it for or and uh. In reality, it doesn't stop the county from coming in and condemning your farm and use it for a landfill or an industrial park or anything anything more. Anything that they can condemn it for for the common good, they can condemn it

and use it. It's a lopsided contract. But now they'll give them some tax credits, but most farmers don't make enough money to take advantage of the tax credits. So these tax credits you can sell them, and you can sell them to a rich millgates, you know, somebody had a lot of money. Uh, they pay you maybe fifty cents on the dollar, maybe twenty five cents on the dollar for these tax credits, and then they can

bounce these tax credits against profits they're they're making it another business. And that's the way of letting the taxpayers in America fund rich people actually buying the rights to your land. It's uh wow, it's kind of circular bit cetery. Yeah. Yeah. And then of course we've got these other projects. You know, going back to the Connecticut case quite some time ago, you had land that was condemned under imminent domain for the use of a corporation. Then

we saw that being done for a foreign corporation. Even though I agree with the all pipelines, I wasn't happy with the way they were doing it with eminent domain. They gave the power to a trans Canada, which is a Canadian corporation, to condemn American farmland that have been in the families many cases for centuries now they're doing it again. Some it is a corporation and seem to have ties to Republicans. Trump has had the CEO there many times.

And then of course they want to pump CO two across the country, condemning farmlands as they go to put this pipeline in so they can stick it in the ground in north and South Dakota and some of it in Iowa. And so people are looking at you know, what is going on, and it

really is the taking over the use of the land imminent domain. But this allows them to make a tremendous amount of money and to exert control without going through this eminent domain process, because that gets you know, that that least

gets attention. This is kind of a subversive way. The way I see it uh to do this with kind of a you know, an investment scheme and still have control of this without really taking possession of it in a sense, isn't it Yeah it is, and it's the landowner or still gets pay taxes. Yeah, pase cattle. They may say, well, these cattle, you know, if these bachelor it's just methane. Too much methane.

We're gonna have to cut You can't raise cattle love. That's what they're telling them in the Netherlands, you know, they say you can't raise cattle kind of change there. You goes back to the language and the farm build the new farm Bill and still being for stop erosion and helpless production. It's all it says about climate changes, the new language in the fire Belle. So

it's all sinister. It's but the globalists they move so slow and they're so patient, and they've got this thing planned out for decades, and it's it's hard for the average person to really grasp how sinister and slow moving this this whole is, this whole issue is it's uh for somebody they want to you know, it's like John Kerry, you know he said, to know they're the American farmer needs to go extinct. Mm hmm. They want us to eat bugs. It's all you couldn't it. They called it what they called

it carry center. So they're they're a word. You look on the ingredients K E C E R. Stuff. I can't remember it. Well, think of something that is like they had, uh, you know, the Alaskan king crab at least be called spider crabs or something. So people don't want to eat that, so they but now they're going to give us probably

real spiders and crabs. I don't know, but in crickets tell you what you know, saying that the ecto skeleton on these crickets really hard on our joints and basically the old people joints, so I don't need anything else been hard on my joints. Well, well, look at this. There is a you pointed out that this is being put forward in a lot of different states, the change to u UCC's Uniform Commercial Code to prohibit cryptocurrency specifically and

to specifically accept a CBDC central Bank digital currency UH. That we first heard about that. Christy Nome talked about it in UH in South Dakota and said, I vetoed this. And then the next thing we saw was DeSantis said he not only vetoed it, but he went the other way. He said, we're going to prohibit CBDC UH, but we're going to accept cryptocurrency,

say that cryptocurrency will be acceptable in the Uniform Uniformmmercial Code as payment. And so this bill, this type of bill has been sent out for the CBDC to a lot of different states. This has as well, how do people identify this? You know that scheme was to change the UCC code. If somebody is looking for this, and we'll give people, we'll see the Senate bill you told me is two zero ninety nine and two zero six nine. Those are the Senate bills in Tennessee. But for people that are outside of

Tennessee, how did they identify this scheme? Because they're running this to a multiple states, what would they look for in terms of a change and a bill? How is it inserted in there for what kind of reported purpose? Tennessee? I mean to Kansas that are brown up in Kansas and Kansas it's it's House Bill twenty five forty one. And Texas it was House Bill thirty one sixty five. But it was in the Texas Senate. That's good, that's good. And they went through the bill, they talked about the sposori.

So it's killed in Texas, still working on in Kansas. Uh, we're working on it here. We've got a U c C bill that that seventy five pages long. The sponsor can't tell you what it does, tell you why we need it, So I'm going to vote against it. I mean that is, we can't take a chance on this. You know, in order to have cipral mac digital currency, they've got to get rid of cryptocurrencies, and right, they got to get rid of vote those guys.

So it's it's so sinister that in Washington's paralyzing nothing. We can get nothing out of Washington now, So the whole burdens on the states to try to put this stuff down. And luckily we've got some good states and they get to go overnors like Christie. Oh my, I watched her all the way through. I would love for her to be that President's Uh. She never wavered through the Kobe Uh. He just seemed to know right off the map of what was good for ride and didn't waiver. And after all these years

in politics, I pay attention. That's right. You gotta watch what they do, know what they say. And so we got this UCC bill that has done and the parallel to it is kind of this, you know, state level NAC. Even though that has temporarily been put on hold, they're going to go back and rebrand it and and make some minor tweaks. And of course we know that that'll be back because that is the perfect way for you know, the NACS once they put it on a stock exchange, the

billionaires can invest in it. Any foreign country can invest in it. So it is a way to take away control of the land and monetize that, monetize the carbon taxes. It's a perfect vehicle. So we know that's going to be back now in terms of the state level stuff as it manifests itself for both public and private lens. What type of things would people be looking for if they're trying to find out if this bill is happening in their state, how you know, what is what is the cover story for it?

The way they label it, Well, one of the headlines here on this acquisition and administration of our culture real estate interest okay, okay, headline okay, And so it'd be something like that because they do use that same type of you know, the language. It's almost like, you know, they get together and they do at some of these exchange councils and stuff. They will give them some legislation and say here, put your name on it and

hand it, you know, sign it and in this legislation. And that's how they get the UCC legislation out to twenty five different states at a time. So I'm sure this type of thing is happening as well at the state level to implement this natural asset company type of scheme. Right, yeah, it's it's it's that's like I say, these globalists, they never give up. They just keep pushing. They're patient. If they don't get it this year, we'll get it next year. May have to wait a generation,

we'll finally get it. And the goal is, you know, the clever role. You know, openly stated they want to reduce the population from seven Bay and down to Hyphabea and all. They hope stutter. I mean, when people tell you what they're trying to do, you probably I don't believe that's right, that's right? What could they laugh about that? And we know what they want to do. And the problem is is that they're doing it, still doing it surreptitiously. Right. Their goals are out there in

front of everybody, but they have these things. Again, this Natural Asset Company thing was kind of under the radar for a full two years and then it was a group out of that you told me about, actually, the American Stewards dot US Uh. They reported on it about two years after it

was introduced. They had an article called monetizing the air we breathe. And that's a good way to understand this, because they're going to monetize everything, the air that we breathe, the water we drink, the food that we eat, everything is going to be controlled by them. We will own nothing. And so they're creating these financial structures, doing it at you know,

the Wall Street level, doing it at the state level. And as you point out, our best chance of we got lucky, I guess temporarily at the stock market level, but they're going to come back with that, and their best chance of stopping this stuff is when it comes in at the state level. Well, I tell people, if if America is saved, the state's going to have to do it. I mean, Washington's paralyzed there. It's just no longer functions. It's black car has been. Tim Birchie twenty

speaks to the lincol Day there. When you leave, it's like leaving a funeral. I mean, it's so sad when he talks of you know that's right, can't do anything done, and and I don't know it's we can do. We can do some good work state level, but we need people call owners and here again, if if you're an old compan you want to put your land in a a lot of a lot of young people that buy this land and put a conservation ease and on it, especially if they've got

a profitable business on the side. There you have business where it's very profitable, then you can buy a piece of farm land for four thousand dollars and you get two thousand dollars worth of tax credits, and you can bounce that off your profit. Over here, a farmer couldn't do that. He doesn't have a profit. But if you've got a rich company over here, it's making lots of money, you can bounce that two thousand tax credits against your

profits from another company. So he actually bought the land for two thousand dollars. So it said, wait for taxpayers, help rich people buy more land. Yeah, yeah, I imagine that's a lot of that is going on with all the land that Bill Gates is buying right now, you know,

the last week. Now him put it under it, And of course I'm sure he's right in on all this, I mean rightly now he can buy that farmland and then get a controvations and all it and then back bout those tax triates against his huge profits and so he's actually buying vee price yeah, oh yeah, absolutely, and then then he can take it off limits to farming and get people to switch over to his other thing that he got in on the ground floor to sell us bugs in some form or the other.

It truly is amazing how these guys have laid this stuff out. And the key thing is for people to understand that. As you point out, one of the key things is for them to understand really what is happening with the conservationsements that many times they don't understand what that is. Uh. They might be doing it even to try to think that this is going to preserve the farm forever and keep this as farmland rather than seeing it lost to development,

and so they could pass that down to future generations. David is in Texas. They don't have zoning, but they have a lot of deed restrictions. If you want to leave your farm to your your children and your grandchildren, you can put a deed restriction on there. No liquor store, no, no, so to be do what you want to do with deed restrictions. You don't have to get tangled up with this third party that uh can sell the management rights to your afarm to another party, can change that three or

four times, and then soon or later the high bidder continue. You can't raise cattle mm hmm. So much knowledge, you know it is, It's just uh all I. All I want to do is is make sure that that these farmers, these landowners, they know what you're getting into. They need to We need to get a good real estate attorney that understands and realize that there is a global movement to do this. I mean, until you realize that mister global is trying to take over the whole world, none of

this makes sense, that's right. But when you realize that that the globalists uh control Washington. You know, they Bushes were all big globalist. I mean, all right Loristan blah blah blah, they're all gloglist by Carthy. Yeah, and you get come lubbist, not a globalist like Jim Burchie or somebody, and they damon I. I mean, it's well, I've interviewed I can't remember his name. I was trying to think of his name, but he produces the Tuttle Twin books and he's out in Utah and he said

he's been involved in politics quite a bit. He helped to get Mike Lee elected as Senator, but he goes, you know, he says, I don't disagree with them on stuff. I hope to get him elected, but he really can't get anything done in Washington because, as you point out, it's so broken. He said, we found that we could do far more at the state levels. He created a think tank, Libertas, and they've gotten you know, a couple hundred bills passed through there to help enhance freedom

and to control the growth of government. And I think that really is the right path. We need to focus on the state level, local level. I think people could clearly see that, as I say, on a daily basis, you could see how that worked out in twenty twenty when everybody was locking Downal government could either make it a lot better for you or they can make it a lot worse. So people need to pay attention to what's going

on at local level. But everybody's just totally obsessed with the presidency, where they're going to have the least amount of influence at all. Both as a voter and certainly in terms of follow up, it's important to make connections to the state and the local politicians to understand what is happening there. Well, the state has one thing going for us that the Feds can't change. They can't make us spend made. They can pace solves, but we don't have

to enforce them, and we have done that any face. Now, there's a lot of talk about notification. I fully believe that notication is legal. Yes, that any action from that is that is unconstitutional can be notified. We can't the states can't notify things that are constitutional, but the Feds do

plenty of things that aren't constitutional, and we can notify those. And all it takes is backbone and say they can't make us spend money, they can't make us enforce their laws, and that's that's probable, and they kind of

typically do it with bribery and blackmail. I think it was it Butt Haulsey that introduced the bill say that we're gonna, you know, not be on the hook to taking a lot of this money from the Department of Education or other things like that to control what we do in schools, because that's the key way that they always control people. Did he introduce the bill to stop that? I believe it was him, maybe with somebody else wait towards that

idea. They they did a study down here and they they found well, I was that we've got more problem with our state Department of Education, and we do the FASSE first. But that's not good. How bad the feds are. If the state is worse than that, that's that's not a good thing at all. Tennessee gets forty percent of their money from the Feds. And I said, yes, but the Feds get all of their money from the states. Yeah, they all them from us, the income tax and

road tax and everything. Well, even on our gas tax, we send them a hundred million more than we get back. Now, a lot of the limbles, they said, all Tennessee is a receiver state. I said, well, you know, I don't believe that. I think we're about in the middle of the pack. I think we send them about as much as we get back. There are states that you know, we I think our will you forever dollar they send in on road tax, they get fied

dollars back. You know, we send a one hundred million more than we get back we send we send the park transportation in the US park trampstation one hundred million roughly. I mean that was just three years ago, the roughly one hundred million more than then we get back from them. So we could opt out of the federal road program. We can sender on speed limits, we do on seed law. We can do a lot of different things. And but like say, it takes leadership and backbone. And I tell people,

Washington's not helped back by lack of brains. They know they're sorry, and they know what they're doing wrong. It's backbone what they don't have. They got plenty of brave what they well, you know, when you're talking about nullification, it's not even a theory. It was done extensively. If you look at marijuana lass for example, that was nullification and Jeff Sessions as much as and you know, regardless of what you think about marijuana, I

refer to that all the time. So people think I support the use of marijuana. I don't. But what I'm saying is is that from a legal standpoint, what we saw was when the states nullified it said you're not going to enforce that here. Jeff Sessions, as desperately as he wanted to do that, didn't do anything about it because it was a bluff. I mean, they had to have the eighteenth Amendment to prohibit alcohol. They didn't have

any constitutional authority to prohibit anything. And when they called his bluff on it, he didn't do anything. And that's what you're talking about, calling their bluff, talking about non commandeering, the fact that they can't commandeer state resources to enforce their laws, and the fact that you know, it just isn't going to happen in the state if we get control. That's why it is so important for people pay attention to what's going on in the state. It

is and they're the saddu has done a great job in Florida. He said all the right things, but he just doesn't catch on there. There's something politicians have to have. It's a it's a trait. There's no word for an English language, or might be one in France, I don't know, but there's the word. I can't pull the word out of there that you got to have and and it's hard. I can't describe it. But he says all the right things. If if someone else read his speeches, they

would love it. But somebody it's not catching off. And uh, he would. He would have made a good president vice president. At one point I was hoping that he could get together Trump and and would have have Trump for four years and there satisfied. Here appears that's not going to happen. And I don't know, I don't know who's gonna get for vice president. I think that's a very very important decision right now. Dem Scock name pops up just you know, even Tolsi gathered up there. Her name's popped up.

Tyler too. So if you go back and you look at people and their ability to make speeches, you know, we would have never had a president Jefferson in today's markets. For sure. Everybody talked about how you he's great at writing stuff and uh, you know, he's a great thinker. But everybody hated his speeches. They said it was all multi feminine. Yeah, and they said Washington was not a great speaker. Yeah. First time he was called all speak on when he's on legislation Virginia, he he panics

and ran out of the room. Must on his teeth. I don't know. Maybe that made him self conscious. I've seen some of his false teeth. They were they were they were primitive. Yeah, well that's the thing, you know, it's back in that time, people knew who they were now we only know people from a distance, we only know them through their media image, and that is something very easy to manipulate. But you know, talking about the threats to farms and and how how this is metastasizing,

and of course it's much further along in the Netherlands. Uh, they're they're you know, as you talked about their banning nitrogen, banning fertilizer. I mean, the people are smuggling and fertilizer and they're treating it like it's some like it's ventanyl or something, you know, coming into the Netherlands. And then you've got people like Bill Gates, who you know, there's something fishy when they say that CO two has to be controlled to the extent that you're

going to have to cut down trees and bury them. That's the most absurd thing I've ever seen. They were given tax credits for growing trees, their giant sink of CO two. I don't think CO two is a problem, you know, it's it's necessary for plants to grow. But they want to cut down the CO two. They want to you know, use jew engineering to take out sunlight and everything. These people are absolutely crazy. There doesn't seem to be anything that they're not capable of trying to do. Uh,

and so what other things have we seen here? And we need to be on the lookout for at the state level in terms of some of these things attacking farming, attacking the building form. Well you mentioned maybe not exactly on that, but you mentioned geoengineering. And we have a bill this year, and of course the people are pushing the bill. They want it's just an outlague their way with top it. I said, well, in politics,

you've got to consider what's new. So what we're going to what I'm pushing to just say, he if you're going to spray something or our Department Environment Tense that tendency Department Environment Conserlation, we need to know what it is and how much you're spraying. I mean that's the first step. What is it? Might be good, We may say, well more, we don't know, but we need to say what is it and how much or you're praying.

And anytime you're spraying, you know, if you've got a factory out here, if you're making tires and anything that goes into the air, they have to report that to our Apartment conserlation. Why do these guys get to fly over and not report it at all. There is. The old theory was that they were For years they denied. Then they said whether it's in the budget? Was you do? Then they said, well, it's a

darken disguise for the global warming. Now then they said, oh, they're putting these isons in the sky to make their satellites communicate with your cell phone better so they can track you better. It's to enhance it's to enhance our communications with the satellites. So I don't know what it is. I mean, I'm just telling you what, but we do know they're spreaying something. Yeah, you don't have contrails until you're about twenty eight thousand feet of all

these things are lower than that, so we know they're spreading something. And I think the first step, which is to drive sign it. What is it? How much that's called? Yeah, there was something done by that in New Hampshire as well. And again that is the beginning, you know, to say, well, tell us what you're doing and then we'll talk about that. I think that's very wise and I'm glad that that's coming up

in Tennessee as well. I have one thing I will talk about, you know, up until the year I was born, nineteen forty seven, had a state property tax, no sales tax, but a property tax. And you paid your property tax to the county and then you sent the county or state tax, and this county sent it on to the state. In nineteen forty seven, they passed the sales tax. They said, if you'll let

us have a sales tax, we'll do away with the property tax. So they rolled property tax back to zero, but they didn't do away with so I the interviews for resolution. It's already passed in the House, and what it would say is we'd have to pass it but several majority this year. Then next year we'd have to have a two third majority. Then we put it on about it with the governor and it would have to get a majority of the people to go to the governor, and we would amend the state

constitution to outohol a state property tax. Good. So that's a big push this year. We've got several big things going. We've got a gold and Silver We're trying to put some of our rainy day fund instead of storing it in stocks and bonds with State Street put it over and the gold and silver and store tex that we can get on our own depository. Golden Sailors about the only thing you ever buy. Hope it doesn't go up because big gold up. Everything else you guys gone down. So like that's right, Yeah,

it keeps its value. We talk about that many times, talk about you know, how much gold did it take for somebody to get a custom made suit, you know, one hundred and fifty years ago or something like that, still about about the same un't have been a store of value at adult God, that's right. Well, those are all good examples, and it's one of the reasons why I'd like to have you on UH and to get people understand that there are thing Washington is dysfunctional. It's like trying to

push on a rope to get anything done. There's too much big money and special interests have taken it over. Can't really get anything done there, but there still is a possibility at least to get something done at the state level. You're a very good example of that, Senator Nicely, and so I really do appreciate the work that you do and the warnings that you give to people, and everybody needs to be on the lookout for these types of sister

bills. To the Natural Asset Company idea things that are being pushed through at the state level so they can take control of state lands as they wish to do with all the federal parks and other things like that. So it's very important that people keep their eyes open and their ears open to what's going on. It's so it's lack the deriveties. Back in the late eighties, yes,

they started previties. I can't explain it to my grandkids what they are, but forever tradion dollars, both the real assets says one hundred trillion ballots started and who knows it's going to all come crashing. And by putting those things together they hide stuff as well. You know, when you when you got an ETF for gold or silver, do they really have the gold and silver in those vaults in Shanghai? And when you look at these real estate

derivatives, you know, we can't separate any particular property. You just mix them all together under essentially. And so a big part of this is, you know, creating confusion and ambiguity about what is really there and what it's attached to. And that's what we're seeing in these nacs as well as these types of structures to try to surreptitiously and quietly take over control through financial instruments of the land. Because they want all of the land under their control and

they want to essentially own everything. This is a way of taking ownership away very very h in a very sneaky way. If someone bought thematic rights the Great Spoke amount in National Park, what could they do that would make it give a option or short they do? I mean, the trains are going to do what you're going to do. Yes, right, that's right. And so the whole thing is is the shell game, and it's a way of getting us to pay them for something that we shouldn't have to pay them

for. You know, I've all always said this about the carbon taxes. I said, so we're gonna pay carbon tax is gonna pay like an indulgence, you know, uh, like some kind of religious indulgence that they we're going to pay to sin, We're going to pay to use energy. Who does that money go to? Well, how are they entitled to have that money? Oh? Well, they're going to do good things with it, Like they're gonna plant trees. Now, I guess they're gonna cut trees down

and bury them. But you know it's going to be whatever the approved activity is, which is all stuff that doesn't make any sense. It doesn't it's not necessary. A whole thing is the show game. Anybody thanks you cutting trees down and burn it's a good idea. I mean, I don't know, it's just it's they don't understand the carbon cycle. But I've always said this, this seal too, they use out the question out there. They

will be selling all that for this cracking. So show me fracking. Depending on what the shows you're in, like our shell here in East Tennessee. Uh, they tell me that the best saying to the fact these are all well with to make them produce more just seal too, so that a little bit expensive and they start to questioning, get a little cheaper than you use more of it. So there's always something sinister behind this stuff that you will

you found out after too late. Maybe it's just big a giant plot by doctor Pepper to make more carbonated drinks going to take over the world and the carbonated drinks sarta nicely is always great talking to you. Thank you so much for warning us about this, and if people want to contact their representatives here in Tennessee. That's Senate Bill two zero nine to nine and two zero six nine. One of them is about the public lands and the other ones about

the private lands. Yes, go ahead. Let me to American Stewards of Liberty. Yes, out of Texas. And they're on the front line of all this, and the American Stewards of Liberty, and thank you. Keep up to them and they'll probably keep you posted. Yes, I need to contact them and get them on as well. They were the ones who started sounding the alarm of this NAC stuff about, you know, a year and a half ago. So that's that's good. Well, thank you very Sanagonica,

thank you very much. The David Night Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Night Show, please do your part and try not to spread it. Financial support, or simply tell the others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread. Father. People have to trust me, I mean, trust the science. Wear your mask, take your vaccine, don't ask questions, use it, free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show.