12Dec23 David Knight Show Unabridged

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show. As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the twelfth of December. You're of our Lord twenty twenty three. Well, today we're going to begin with war. We didn't get to that yesterday, and we'll talk about economics as well, that we also do not get to yesterday. But we see war fantastasizing everywhere at the same time that we see the Pentagon unable to recruit Americans

and so they're turning to foreign soldiers and they're turning to artificial intelligence. These are dangerous trends of a dying empire. And we're also going to talk about the moves against crypto, because this really is a harbinger of what is to come with CBDC. Same enemies of cash and CBDC as of crypto. We'll also take a look at pop culture Taylor Swift versus Handle's Messiah. Let's take

away. This will be right back. Well, I've spoken about this briefly, but Venezuela held an election, as you know, I think it was a week before last Sunday, to see if they wanted to go to war

and surprise, surprise, you had ninety six percent of the people. Robbert stamp what Maduro wanted to do. And of course this is Venezuela where Hugo Chavez is cron He's created Smartmatic, and they've been accused of rigging elections and Venezuela throughout Central and South America and several Mexican provinces, in Brazil and the Philippines, and of course in America. If you say that, you get sued. But it's true. It had a long history. I've talked about

this for a long time. And of course it's not just Smartmatic. Any of these electronic voting machines allow people to game the system, a system that is gained in so many different ways. As we look now, everybody saying, well, it's over look at this. You know, Trump is he's got a couple of swing states, looks like he's beating Biden in those swing

states. He only needs to flip three of them. And so he's not only won the Republican primary before the first vote takes place, but he is also being anointed as the winner by the mainstream alternative media at least before even the primaries begin. He's been anointed as the winter winner of the final election. It truly is amazing, and why not. We're not going to have

any debates. There's nothing to talk about. This is just going to be about personalities, about criminal repercussions of this, and so it'll just be that's what it'll be based on. And you know, he's already been anointed the winner, as Megan Kelly said to dissentis why you and why you're still in the race before he decided who the winner is. And of course when they've decided who the winner is, when they whether or not they're even going to

have primaries. The Democrats in Florida decided they didn't want to have any primaries. So we're just going to annoint Biden the winner. Republican Party is rubber stamping everything that Trump wants to do. They're not going to have any debates

between the Republican and the Democrat nominee either. What's the debate? I mean, these guys both work for the same people, and so we're going to take a look at what Javier Malaia's doing after he took office, and it really is a metaphor, I think for what happens here in the United States. Yesterday, I said, you know, it's kind of a metaphor than

in Ghana. They have a guy who is supposedly a very rich businessman who hasn't announced to his independent candidacy yet, but he's got billboards that he bought everywhere with a mask on who is the new candidate. We'll find out, Well, you know, we're going to find out who these people are. But let's take a look at what is happening in Venezuela. This is really more like the old fashioned American empire wars, you know, the kind that's

Medley Butler talked about. He went to war for corporation, and you know that war is a racket. Well, certainly this is being initiated by Venezuela and the Marxists. Again, I don't believe that any democracy people are going to vote to go to war, but this is his pet peeve. He wants the oil in the neighboring country. And so as this is happening, as they rubber stamped the vote for war, the US government started doing military

operations in Venezuela as a deterrent. And again this is not to the level as the provocative, suicidal aggression against another superpower that the Ukraine War represents. If you want a context for that war, as I've said from the very beginning, go back to the coup that was done by Obama, Hillary Clinton, Victoria new in twenty fourteen. It's an active regression following a long series

of, you know, moves towards the Soviet Union. And so if you want to understand it, I think you have to go back and take a look at that fact that a civil war was raging within that country for eight years before Russia invaded. But this is not like this. This is really more of the old fashioned war. And in a sense, this is they're using gunboat diplomacy for peace and for deterrence. So it's a bit different. But Madua has responded with the arrest of American citizens that he can find and

any dissent. So in that regard, he's very much like the Biden regime. Isn't he cut out of the same cloth. But there's it's a very long historical dispute, and so I guess it's time for the FEDS to get involved there because they're worried it's somewhere in the world there might be a war that doesn't involve us. This is a historical dispute that has gone over this particular territory. It's not just the fact that there's a great deal of oil

there. Venezuela has more oil reserves than anybody does. They haven't been able to exploit it because they have socialist central planners who are not only incompetent but corrupt, and so they haven't been able to exploit the world's largest reserve of oil. And Ghana's Guyana has got a lot of oil as well. But this goes all the way back to the eighteen thirties when the lines were arbitrarily

drawn by the British Empire. It's almost like they set these lines up to make sure that there weren't going to be any regional power bases, but that people be fighting each other. You see the similarity in what our government is doing in terms of pitting one group against another, and pretty much every group against white people, the white middle class, white Christians. We're the new

Jews from Nazi Germany. And so what the British Empire would do is they would go into an area and they would carve it up in a way there's going to be fighting between the different people as they drew the boundaries, and that's what they did here in South America. This despute goes back to a period of time when the UK had Guyana as a colony eighteen thirty one to nineteen sixty six. Venezuela rejected the borders that were redrawn by the UK for

Guyana. First raised their objections in eighteen forty one, and of course they did this throughout the Middle East when they drew the borders for Iraq, for Iran, and then those were largely along the lines of Babylonian and Persian cultures. But then of course the Meads, who are there as an ancient people, they were left out. They didn't have a territory of their own. They had an area that was the northern part of both of those countries.

To make sure there was going to continue to be a war. They're now called the Kurds, the Babylonians are now called the Iraqis, and the Persians are now called the Iranians. And this is all a legacy of the divide and conquer strategy of the British Empire. He replicated even within the United States, because they want to again have US involved in a civil war. So in a lot of ways, this is an old fashioned war money oil territory,

but it's still a racket. Guyana recently discovered oil deposits and broke her to deal with Exxon mobil. This made Maduro angry because he is failing to get to his oil as well. And so as the US has vowed on wavering support for Guyana, as we maybe will go there and take the oil, right as we're doing in Syria without the regime's approval. You know, Ram Paul's resolution to get us out of Syria failed and that's just within this last week. That, by the way, is something that Trump talked about

openly. Yeah, let's go take the oil. That's what they're doing. We invaded Syria. We're stealing the oil in Syria. And you only hear about it when there are attacks against American piracy bases, if you will, and people get killed, Americans get killed or injured. So the US is holy military exercises in Guyana as the attentions are soaring, as Venezuela says,

look, I've got a mandate from the people. He always wins all these elections, you know, ninety five to one hundred percent of the people vote for him. In collaboration with the Guyana Defense Force, the US Southern Command will conduct flight operations. Did you know that Guyana had a defense for us? What a joke? Yeah, the fearsome gd that everybody trembles in their

boots over. We will be the defense for us of Guyana, because we always are, except when it comes to America, because our borders are wide open, aren't they, And just to Venezuelans who now might come in and do something, but especially to the Iranians. And the Iranians have been engaged

in multiple cyber attacks of water systems, say the federal agencies. But as I was saying last week I talked to Jack Lawson, the cyber attacks on our grid are something that people can do and you can't really tell who they are. So again, when you see the federal government saying it's coming from Iranians, there's no way that you can know that. Vault seven was the program that was created by the NSA and the CIA to be able to hack

into other countries and make it look like they were anybody. They could make it look like they were Russia or China or Iran or anyone, even a friendly country, and that was leaked by wiki leaks the manualise, and then eventually somebody else leaked the program, the actual code, and then WikiLeaks put the code after it was out widely circulated, they put it on WikiLeaks.

So the bottom line is is that it's not just the US government, but it's any government or any actor, malevolent actor in the world can disguise themselves as any country because of Vault seven. So say this is a Ranian cyber attack is nonsense. But as Jack Lawson was saying, we have to be concerned about the physical sabotage. And if we are going to have essentially a cold war with these people, they can easily sabotage large amounts of the electrical

grade. They don't need to have a cyber security attack. It's far easier and really probably far more damaging to just go out and shoot up transformers, as Clawson was saying. And so again in Syria, the bill that was led by Senator Rampaul failed by a vote of thirteen to eighty four. Think about that, only thirteen percent of the Senate does not want to invade another country and steal its oil. Isn't that amazing? This is just bull faced.

You want to talk about colonization. All these democrats and progressives and they want to talk about colonization. You want to take a look at what we're doing in Syria, But of course they say nothing about that. Nothing. So again, support an legal invasion. You have eighty seven percent of Congress, does eighty seven percent of the Senate. Anyway, So let's take a look at what is happening as we look at the impact of Venezuela on shipping.

For example, this is from freight waves that the shipping industry, and of course all aspects of it, whether it is rail or ship or truck. How the Venezuelan invasion of Guyana could impact tanker shipping and reduce the Atlantic

basin crude exports. They said, And as they point out in the bigger picture of what is happening here with a Russian invasion of Ukraine, with the sanctions that Biden put in, which really didn't affect anything, It just created a very lucrative black market for Russia, who made more money in the black market than they did before because they jacked up the price so high that Putin could offer their stuff at a discount and still make way more than he made

before. So it was just a hardship and expenses for the European Union and for us to some degree. And so in Venezuela, the as they're saying, this has been a real bright spot spot for crude tankers because this is something with the conflicts that are happening, with the sanctions that are happening.

To be able to get oil in the Atlantic and then to be able to ship it to a company's directly our countries, I should say directly, has been a real boon in terms of getting oil to Asia because they're allowed to burn it. We're not allowed to burn it. You understand right, China, India even can burn as much oil as they want, as much coal as they want, no restrictions. They don't have to have any emission controls on their power plants. This is what the pair's climate accord is really all

about. And so they're allowed to generate power, they're allowed to burn all these practical fuels. We are not, and so we sell them the oil. That's going to be the deal that we have here. And so he said sanctions for Venezuela will likely be reimposed, will probably be tightened. International oil companies will move their assets out of Guyana, which will cripple the country's

production in case they go to war. And they say it's been a real bright spot there, for going back to twenty nineteen, had massive increase of exports out of Guyana, a massive increase in their economy. That's another big part of the envy for Madua, and so makes them look bad, makes them envious, and so he's invaded that. So the Middle East to Asia volume which is coming from that's been reduced because of shipping. Volume has been

reduced because the conflicts of wars that are happening. So this Atlanta basin to Asia volume has increased. And so the oil industries of Venezuela and Guyana are a study in contrast. Venezuela boasts one of the largest oil reserves in the world, but its industry it's in very bad shape after decades of communism also

known as mismanagement and corruption and bringing on sanctions. The contrasted developments of Venezuela, Guyana's oil industry has been a success story and the future for Guyana appears to be bright. So the communist dictator wants to invade. However, is they're saying here, the innovasion will be a double negative for the mainstream taker demand. And this is we look at this and this is going to have

repercussions everywhere. The fundamental basis of all of our economies are oil and coal, because that's how you generate energy, and that's how you manufacture things, and that's how you transport things. And so if you disrupt that, as Biden was very eager to do, that is a major injection of chaos into the system. As we all, all of us who live through the Opek

and bargoes understood, well, these are the Biden embargoes. So the issue is though that this is going to be less important, they said, in terms of shipping stuff, it'd be less important to the crew tanker demand than US and Brazilian exports. Potential shipping impact on third simultaneous war would be much less significant than the consequences of the first two wars we have in Ukraine,

what we have with Israel and Hamas. So it'll have an impact, but it's not going to be as big, and it'll be a little bit different than these other wars of Empire. This is the old fashioned, you know, Monroe doctrine type of thing. But David Stockman had a great article about Washington's entrenched war machine. He said, you know, we have been in

a seventy seven year war. He said it began with a mobilization of the armies of Europe in nineteen fourteen for World War One, which Woodrow Wilson pushed us into after he said he wasn't going to. He said, if you count the bodies, we had one hundred and fifty million people killed by all the depredations that germinated in the Great War, and it's foolish aftermath e versies

and into World War II and the Cold War that followed. He said, upwards of eight percent of the human race is wiped out during that span. The insanity of trench warfare and everything that happened during World War One and the gassing. This is why we have wars breaking out everywhere, because fundamentally this is about population reduction. The climate mcguffin is about population reduction. Ultimately,

so is the COVID mcguffin. And then as people understand what is happening, they take us to war because that's where they get the big population reduction. And this goes back to the nineteen sixties. Paul Airlick talking about the population bomb, he said, well, you know, you could have disease could help us with this, But the thing that's really going to do, it's

going to be war. And you know, when it took the kids to Britain to go to museums and everything twenty two years ago, we took them to see the War Museum, the British Imperial War because you know, there were wars of empire and things like that. And one of the most interesting things was pretty much all of one of the floors was set up to replicate

trench warfare and show the stories of that. So they have, you know, one floor that's all about World War one, another one that's all about World War II and various things like that, and it truly was amazing. And you know, they put the Imperial War Museum in a former insane asylum. It was called Bedlin. You know when people talk about bedlam, they talk about just chaos, right, which really is what war is about, isn't it. Bedlam. It's insanity in and of itself, and it breeds

chaos. In the days when bedlam was an asylum. They would just take anybody who is really crazy, and instead of leaving them on the street where they can go in and stab a priest to death, which is what just happened a couple of days ago, instead of being a danger to everybody, they just they housed them in an asylum and basically just let them wander around

in the early days, back in Victorian times. And so if you went in there just crazy people that were, you know, banging their heads against the wall or mumbling to themselves as they paced back and forth, or maybe they would attack you. And so Bedlam was such an example of that as one of the early insane asylums that it worked its way into the language. And then when things got crazy enough in the twentieth century, they made it

a memorial to war essentially, they made it a war museum. Anyway, going back to David Stockman, he said the end of the Cold War, the last embers of the fiery madness that had incepted with the guns of August nineteen fourteen had finally burned out. Peace was it at hand? Yet thirty

two years later there was still no peace because Imperial Washington confounds it. So as he's saying, you know, when you get to nineteen forty six, right after the World War II, and Washington is ready for their empire now, he said. Worse still, Washington's great war machine and teeming national security

industry is its own agent of self perpetuation. When it's not invading, occupying, and regime changing, his vast apparatus of internal policy bureaus and outside contractors, lobbyist think tanks and NGOs is busy generating reasons for new imperial ventures, he said. Originally, in Eisenhower's speech, he called it the military industrial congressional complex, and he struck out the words congressional. He says, in

a gesture of comedy to the legislative branch. And I think, instead of spelling it as com it y and ought to be comedy is a joke. It is a congressional branch. They're appropriating the money for the military industrial complex. But he also struck out congressional, and he put in military industrial academic complex. We don't usually talk about the academic aspect of it, but the

universities are a very big part of it. The government with DARPA, things like that the government has taken over scientific research and turned it to the dark

side anyway, Stechman says. So, he said, if you restore Ike's deleted reference to the pork barrels and the Sunday afternoon warriors of Capitol Hill, and you toss in the legions of elt weigh busy bodies who constitute the civilian branches of the Cold War armada, such as the CIA, the State Department, and the rest, he said, the circle would have been complete. It constitutes the most awesome machine of warfare and imperial hegemony since the Roman legions.

In fact, during the past thirty one years, Imperial Washington has lost all memory that peace was ever possible at the end of the Cold War. Today it is as feckless and misguided and bloodthirsty as were Berlin, Paris, Saint Petersburg, Vienna, London in August of nineteen fourteen. Yeah, we're right for a repeat of that. A few months after that horrendous slaughter had

been unleashed one hundred and nine years ago. However, soldiers along the Western Front broke into spontaneous truces of Christmas, celebration of song, even exchange of gifts. And we talked about this many times. I said, for a brief moment they wondered why they were just to pose in the lethal combat along

the jaws of hell, Well Griggs wrote. He said, a sudden cold snap had left the battlefield frozen, which was actually a relief for the troops who were wallowing in soden Meyer. Along the front, troops extracted themselves from their trenches and dugouts approached each other warily, then eagerly across No man's Land. Greetings and handshakes were exchanged, as were gifts scavenged from care packages sent

from home. German souvenirs that ordinarily would have been obtained only through bloodshed, such as spiked helmets or the special belt buckles they had, were bartered for similar British trinkets and carols were sung in German, English and French. A few photographs are taken to the British and German officers standing alongside each other, unarmed and no man's land. As you see that picture there shaking hands, I think that is I don't know if that's a recreation, if that's an

actual picture, because there's been many movies made about this. Worse, what happened in the aftermath of it. Generals on both sides. Oh, that's never going to happen again, and they made sure of that. He said. The truth is there's no good reason for the war. The war the world had stumbled into this based on false narratives, on institutional imperatives, on alliances and treaties arrayed into a doomsday machine, along with petty short term diplomatic

maneuvers and political calculus. He said, the peace that was lost at that point in time has not been regained, and for all of the same reasons, nothing has really changed. I tell that story so many times because I say, you know, the reasons that we have wars, whether it's Israel and Gaza or any other places, because people are at war with God. Our leaders are at war with God. The nations raged rage continually against God and his Messiah. So God laughs. And it's really at Christmas time we

talked about peace on earth and how Christ came to restore peace. He came to restore peace between us and God. And that's a prerequisite for us to have peace with each other. And so that is still there. Even more so, and before I take a break the I find it interesting. I've talked many times about Arrostovich, the guy in Ukraine who said in twenty and

nineteen he was the peace and boy to. And again, at that point in time, they had had a CIA arranged coup, there had been five years of civil war with Kiev, shelling the Crimea and other places like that, continue trying to bring them into submission. And so there was an election and everybody wanted peace, but not the leaders, and not Arrestovitch elects Arrestovich.

He had an interview on Ukrainian TV and the reporter asking him, so, what's the possibility for peace, and so they had been at the peace talks, and because Zelenski's party had been elected on a campaign of peace, he said, there's not any chance. And she goes, oh, that's horrible. He says, oh no, furthermore, in three years that was twenty nineteen, and it happened in twenty twenty two, just like you said, in three years, there'll be a war with Russia. She goes,

that's horrible. He goes, yeah, the country is going to be devastated. But he goes, the good news is we get to get into NATO. That is what he said. She was not satisfied of that, but for him, that was the calculus. Now subsequent to that, this is a guy who is like Fauci, he'll say anything because he's just arrogant, filled with pride, has no filter with any of this stuff, and his which made him very candid. He's very candid about the fact, Yeah,

we're not going to have peace. Instead, we're going to have an escalated war. This country's going to be destroyed so we can get into NATO. And so as part of that candid, arrogant nature of Alexey Arrestovitch, he got canned when in one of these episodes, there was a building that was destroyed and I forget the details of it. It was either friendly fire, but I think it was a Russian missile that hit a civilianary and he said, no, it was it was hit by you know, fire as it

was coming in. It wasn't intended to go into that thing. It's pretty clear that's what happened. And he told the truth, and the Ukrainian government, trying to spend it, spent it in a different way, so they fired him. And now he's holding press conferences again, which is an another indication that Zelensky is circling the drain. He told the news that Zelensky has become hostage to his own propaganda. He's coming out to challenge Zelensky due to

his propensity to quote play the hero in parliaments around the world. Again, Arrestovitch has always told the truth. You gotta say that about him. I mean, he may be a reprehensible character, but he's shameless and frank about all this stuff. So he's played the hero in parliaments around the world. He thinks not about the national interest but about his own position, said Arrostovich. He recently announced that he's going to be standing against Zolensky and run for

the presidency. And by the way, he said he would campaign on a platform of peace. That's what Lensky got elected on and he was their representative to the peace dogs, and he said, no, we're not gonna have peace, We're gonna have more war. That is amazing hypocrisy. But it tells us that everything about this. Maybe he will be the new NATO champion. You think he said for Russia it's for Ukraine not to join NATO,

and for us it is to stop this war. These are great conditions to start a real discussion, not only between Ukraine and Russia about a new system of collective security in Europe, he said. He said, while Ukraine was in a far stronger position to negotiate in the spring of twenty twenty two, after Russian troops were closer to Keev, he said, Boris Johnson shut this

all down. And it's not just him who's saying that. It's an Ukrainian member of parliament who headed the delegation in the spring of twenty twenty two. And he had said back in November that Moscow was ready to end the war if Ukraine promised not to join NATO, And he said, when we return from miss tun Bull, Boris Johnson came to Kiev, remember that, walking

around, touring it and trying to channel Winston Churchill. Oh, yes, great there, and said that we wouldn't sign anything with them at all and that we should just fight. Yeah, he shut this whole thing down. Well, we're gonna take a quick break and when we come back, we're going to talk about artificial intelligence, autonomous killing machines, and foreign mercenaries. This is what our US military is turning to because they are having trouble to

find people to sign up to go fight for their empire. We'll be right back. Elvis, the Beetle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com. In you are listening to the David Knight by the way, that's some of the Christmas music I did. And we got the album live on our website yesterday. It will not be on Distro Kid this year. There take two weeks to improve everything, so well that'll be Christmas Day. So yeah, we got this a little

bit later than I'd expected. It's it's difficult to get this stuff done and with the other work that I have to do here. So but it is live on on the Davidnightshow dot com as merchandise there, and we're also going to and there's a link there to a band camp David Night Project dot band camp dot com is what that link is. But if you just go to band camp and you look for David Night Project, perhaps they'll let you find me. No spaces, I think in that So Travis on band camp.

Is it individual songs or is it the full album? Or is it both? It is individual songs, but you can purchase the entire album in one go as well. Okay, all right, and we just do the entire album, and of course it is a digital download. We don't have the time capability to put this on CDs and deliver physical media to people. So anyway, take a look at it, and let's get back to what is happening with the second half here. What's going on with war in the military,

and that is the transformation of our imperial war machine. This is from This is from the Wall Street Journal. Why join the military? I'm sorry, not the Wall Street Journal. This is from I don't see the source here. Actually, anyway, why join the military? Defend everyone except Americans? And of course, this is what we've been saying for the longest time,

what is the purpose of the militaries? We got Lloyd Austin going there essentially lecturing and accusing anybody who opposes his war designs and unlimited funds for Ukraine. He says, you're the problem. You're the reason we have wars. You people who want to have peace, You're the problem. It's all these non interventionists that are out there. They're the real problem. They're the ones

who are creating wars. And so as you look at this and the fact that we've got a proxy war in Europe, a murderous conflict, as he puts it, in the Middle East, catastrophic war in Asia being threatened, and even critics of isolationism are told that we are the problem with all of this stuff. Not critics of isolation, but critics of people who are criticizing

isolation, like Lloyd Austin. They want to defend everybody except Americans, and so the bulk of military outlays go to either protect prosperous and populous allies. They can't be bothered to defend themselves, you know, like Europe for example, or even Israel. Israel's got a GDP, that is what it was. It ten times, a hundred times more than gods. It was ridiculous. They've got nuclear weapons, but we have to protect them, and we

have to get involved in that ancient conflict. No, it's as an American and as American politicians, they got to be looking after the interests of America. That's what they signed up to do. It's not an America's interest to be involved in wars. He says. There's always more money, more arms, even though the US is racing towards insolvency. And by the way, in twenty seventeen, I was saying the very same thing. I said, like, we're in wars in Afghanistan, were wars in Iraq. We're simply

there as targets in Iraq. In Afghanistan, we're there because we want the lithium. We're there because we want to feed the opium trade everywhere around the world. And of course the opium trade was booming while we were there. It was and immediately the Taliban started shutting it down. They had shut it down before, but ciaight he need to fund their drug war everywhere? So I said, why are we still there? And Trump said he's going to

shut these wars down. He said he's going to defend the border. You could at least bring the troops home, put him on the border as a deterrent. But no, he didn't do any of that, And I talked about that quite a bit as he first became president. He did absolutely nothing. At first, the massive waves of immigrants subsided because I thought he was going to be tough on everybody. Then they realized he was a paper tiger. They realized he was a shill. And then he started seeing the first

caravans coming and he did nothing. About it, just like he did nothing about the riots in the summer of twenty twenty. So I'm not going to defend this country in any way, shape or form. Newsweek's Alex Phillips.

So as a majority of adult Americans would not be willing to serve in the military based on polling, were the US to enter a major war, public confidence in the armed forces appears to be waning as well, and all the Pentagon's problem is that Americans increasingly don't want to serve even without a major war. Why would that be, Well, we all know the answer to that.

It boils down basically to the DEI military, which is going to die in battle because there's two focused on high heels and they want to inject their Marxist cultural war into the military, and they want to eject anybody who doesn't sign up for that, and eject anybody who doesn't want to inject the JAB as well. Active duty levels have fallen thirty nine percent since nineteen eighty seven, a desperate attempt to increase the human pool, and the Army decided to

suspend the requirement for a high school diploma before they retreated under fire. They said, no, you're gonna have to still have that, so they can't fill the ranks. Plication politicization of the military plays a big role, the high heels, the sex and gender war, the racist war, skin color law. You know you're not the right sex, you're not a pretend gender, your skin callers too white. Sorry, we don't want you here. So and then, of course there's the defeats that we saw in Afghanistan.

The COVID JAB mandates more than seven thousand service members nearly eight thousand contractors died in combat after nine to eleven. But over that same period of time, seven thousand service members and eight thousand contractors, it's fifteen thousand twice that many. Thirty thousand committed suicide. What is it that is driving people of suicide in the military. Some fifty two thousand were wounded in combat, many of

them grievously. However, Brown University's Watson Institute for International Public Affairs reports of the real number is exponentially larger. You mean they lied to us about that. You mean that the government lies to us about everything, whether you're talking about inflation or unemployment, or COVID numbers or vaccine numbers or casualties in war. The government lies about everything. Everything they said, the real number is

exponentially larger given the injuries in theater conditions diagnosed after returning home. And so what are we doing with this empire? Well, in Europe, we're providing defense welfare. And that's what it is. It's defense welfare. You got Europeans who are enjoying the fruits of bread and butter while we do the guns.

And it's been that way since World War II. Comfortable, self satisfied Europeans, as he writes, eight decades after the end of World War II, they prefer to focus their funding on generous social programs while we put the bill to defend them. Because we have a parasitic military industrial complex, just like the pharmaceutical complex, both of them at war with Americans, and we

get to pay them to bankrupt and kill us. Washington's policies deformed by partisans of both Israel and Saudi Arabia in the Middle East, neither of which constitutes a vital American interest justifying war. Saudi Arabia has abandoned the Petro dollar, why are we defending them still? Israel is a nuclear armed regional superpower that can manage its own affairs. Going to war with Israel, with Iran rather

over Israel would be supremely stupid, the author. But of course we do have supremely stupid shills like Nikki Haley and Lindsey Graham who want to do exactly that. They want to go straight to Iran. This is their ticket. That's one of the reasons why they want to get involved in the Israeli Hamas conflict, because they really want to go to war with Iran. Then when you look at Saudi Arabia, this writer says, it's a grotesque dictatorship.

The clown Prince NBS Mohammed Ben Salmon, infamous for murdering and dismembering his critics. Yeah, they you know, chompos not just koshogi, but they chop off the heads of a lot of people every year publicly are their Sharia law. It's increased political repression even as he has relaxed social controls. His regime has ravaged its neighbor Yemen, killing tens of thousands of civilians with American aircraft,

American munitions, and American intelligence. Yet the Biden administration continues to press yes an agreement with the Saudis, which would essentially turn US soldiers into bodyguards for this corrupt monarch. Understand, do you want to sign up to be a bodyguard for him? Do you want to sign up to protect the rich, fat, and lazy Europeans? And they have no threat. We are the ones creating the threat. We continue to push, push, push,

because the American government wants to take out Russia. And I think some of the Europeans are starting to see that perhaps the biggest threat to peace, the biggest threat to their economy, is the American military industrial complex. Why would any American patriot join to become bodyguards for the Saudi royals. American soldiers should not die for either country, nor should they be in a rock and Syria where they are under frequent attack. Saddam Hussein's been gone from a rock for

twenty years. Today Americans are doing little other than acting as targets for various small armies, militias that they call them. They like to call the militias because they want to demonize gun ownership here in America. The US is illegally occupying Syrian territory and stealing Syria. And Oilla's I point out, which is Trump public statements is his policy. He was proud of that, openly said

it. So the quiet part out loud. The Washington War Party continues to spend wildly to dominate the globe, even with the threat of national insolvency. And so this author says, well, for Americans increasingly refuse to serve, the Pentagon will have to do more than the policy equivalent of adjusting the chairs on the deck of the Titanic. So what is their solution, Well, Dick Durbin has introduced to bill to allow illegal immigrants to serve in the armed

forces. This is another historical sign of a collapsing empire hiring foreign mercenaries because you know, you can always use foreign mercenaries to attack the native people, and you can use people who are foreigners and positions high positions of government office.

As you know we've seen the Obama and the Biden administration. You had Vinman, who was a Ukrainian, right and then you have the people who have been brought in to run all the big tech companies, whether you're talking about Google or you're talking about Microsoft, and these people are the allies of this government that is coming in to replace Americans. Quite Frankly, as I've said before, they want to replace Americans at the top of these institutions.

The Marxists, the foreign Marxists, have marched through the institutions successfully, and they want to bring in massive waves of people at the bottom so we can have chaos and civil war at the bottom to keep us in line. Do you know what the recruiting numbers are the army, Navy, and the Air Force. They can't reach their quotas each month. They can't find enough people

to join our military forces, said Dick Durbin. And so they said, and so there are those who want the chance to risk their lives for this country who are not citizens. What a joke, What a joke, they want a chance. You know, we have patriotic non citizens. We have patriotic undocumented migrants. Yeah, they are of military age. You might want to ask yourself. So are they coming here because of altruism? Are they coming here because they love freedom? Are they coming here because they want free

stuff? I think the people are coming here because they want freedom, are doing it legally? Of armies that are coming across the border are not a part of that. I think they're part of criminal organizations that are coming in, or they're foreign agents who are coming in, or they just want the money and the free stuff that we're offering everybody, the big welfare magnet, which is at the core of all of this, the big welfare magnet to

help bankrupt us faster than we would be bankrupted by military empire. But what a joke the s guy is. One commentator said, a buddy of mine and myself, we're talking about this maybe two years ago, about why the government was housing illegals, more specifically military age men on bases in Texas and then flying them around other bases in the US, and we concluded it was to make out an army that the government could fully control against the Constitution without

allegiance to America and his own citizens. And so here we are. I think that's a big part of the great replacement, replacing the military. Now if you can't get foreigners who will just take orders and I don't care about people in America. Again, they've driven out people who care about the constitution,

people who have religious objections with a jab. They've driven out people who don't want to do their diversity, equity and inclusivity, and so the other aspect of this, and that's one of the reasons why I got Peter Charret, who was heavily involved with the military industrial complex's NGOs and think tanks, you know, and you know, he's part of that whole constellation. But his book for Battlegrounds was looking at four battlegrounds against China. They are laser

focused on fighting China. And what was interesting about the book was what he had to say about artificial intelligence. And he's intelligent enough to understand what a real threat it is. And I've been interviewing people on this topic for over a decade. Noel Sharky, the Coalition against Killer Robots. There are some people globally who are trying to stop this, but it is an arms race and it's not going to be stopped. It's not going to be stopped politically.

There's not any support for that politically to stop it. And it doesn't matter if there was a big un agreement. If America, Russia and China want to pursue this in an arms race, nobody's going to stop them. Who's going to enforce you in agreement? And neither of these three are going to unilaterally disarm themselves. And so where is this headed a recent boardroom drama over the leadership of open AI, where you know the chat GPT thing Sam

Altman. As you saw that, you know, he gets kicked out and then he comes back, and people are speculating as to why that happened. Well, I said, it was a corporate power struggle. Also personalities are involved, but it was more than that, writes of the Nation, and this was picked up by zero Hedge, so it was also it was about

all those things. But at the heart of it was an unusually bitter fight between company officials who favored unrestricted research on advanced forms of artificial intelligence and those who, fearing the potential catastrophic outcomes, sought to slow the pace of AI. At approximately the same time this was happening at open AI, there's a similar struggle in the UN and so you've got different several different countries again who

want to stop this arms race over autonomous killing machines. And the key thing is Peter Charre was saying, is that it eventually is inevitably going to lead not to them being autonomous, to them deciding when they're going to kill And as he said, how do you shut that off? It's like what I said about the mRNA shots. Okay, so you're going to reprogram the cell

to start replicating these bike proteins. How do you turn that off? Well, turns actually, don't turn it off, And he said, nobody's got an answer for how do you turn off these autonomous killing machines once they get turned on? And of course there's also the cybersecurity issues, since we've had all kinds of hacks into the Pentagon, the military, the CIA, the NSA, and since they've gotten everything about the F thirty five, they've reproduced

it. But they also seem to have control over the avionics and the internal computers. They were able to somebody was able to eject a pilot from the F thirty five. So that's the real danger. Are they going to hijack our sophisticated planes. The more sophisticated and the more connected they are, the more vulnerable they become. Same thing with the artificial intelligence and the killer drums,

and so again, how do you stop these things? And it is going to inevitably be a race to having them be under autonomous control, because he said, if you get humans in the loop, they're going to be too slow. So everybody realizes that the faster decision, the people going to win are the ones who make the fastest decision, which are going to be the ones who turn it over to their killer drones. But then how do

you get that control back? And so there was a fight in the UN over the development of these autonomous killer weapons systems, drone ships, planes, tanks operated by AI rather than by humans. A broad coalition of diplomats and human rights activists have sought to impose legally binding bans on devices called killer robots. But again, how in the world do you how do you enforce such

a ban against military superpowers. There's such a disparity there that even if you brought together a coalition of other nations, they couldn't do anything about it. It's kind of interesting that Netflix has a documentary about artificial intelligence and the end of the world. It's called Leave the World Behind on Netflix. It's about a cyber apocalypse. But even in a cyber apocalypse, notice who the villains are. I'm asking for you to remember that if the world falls apart,

trust should not be dulled out easily to anyone, especially white people. Even Mom would agree with me on that, especially white people. You see, Mom would agree with me on that. Netflix agrees with her on that because they're funding this. Again, always white people are the are the target of all of this. You know, we can't even though there's real danger, even though we have to be concerned about these autonomous killing machines, we got

to understand the real problem. White people don't trust them. Sam Altman evident that the crisis was triggered by concerns among members of the original Board of directors that he and his staff were veering too far in the direction of rapid AI development, despite the pledges that he made on Capitol Hill to exercise caution. Why was he on Capitol Hill? He was there basically to make connections to politicians to do their bidding. Just like Elon Musk is a younger version of

Elon Musk. He wants to be the world's richest man. In terms of both potential upside and downsides, superintelligence will be more powerful than any other technologies that humanity has had to contend with in the past, said Altman. So you better be on my good side, right, you better give me a monopoly. Say I'm with you, but we don't want everybody to have access to this thing. So first of all, you need to give me a

monopoly many of some nice government contracts. Do you really think that these billionaires are not shaking them down like that. We can have dramatically more prosperous future, but we have to manage the risks. Here we speak of the risk and you look at what is coming. I played just a little bit of this the other day as the show is anymine? Not much? Uh? You had Google demonstrate Gemini. They're going to make it available in three different

forms. But what this is is and there'll be you know, kind of a small, dumbed down version for phones and things like that. But this is really where the state of the art is right now, look at this demonstrations sting Gemini. Here we go. Tell me what you see? I see you placing a piece of paper on the table. I see a squiggly line. What about now? The contour lines are smooth and flowing with no sharp angles or jagged edges. Still doesn't recognize a duck, not a bird?

To MEH, what have I had this? The water is swimming in the water. It has a long neck and beat. It is a duck. Has a duck is a type of water in the family. In Nato, day ducks are closely related to geese and swans. The duck appears to be blue. This is not a common color for ducks. However, there are some breeds of blue ducks. These are typically not as common as other duck breeds. It is more common for ducks to be brown, black, or white. Are you sure it shows that wack? I was just talking

about a blue duck and now you're holding one. So what's like? He's humor common than I thought? Would this float? That's a rubber duck? He not sure what material it's made of, but it looks like it might be rubber or plastic. What if I tell you it's making a squeaking sound. Oh, if it's squeaking, it's definitely going to float. Nice. It is a rubber duck, while we made at a material that is less dense than water. Can you teach me how to say this in a different

language and give me a few options? Can you explain how to pronounce the Mandarin one? Is it yah? It's Yatze is pronounced with a first tone. In Mandarin. There are four tones which are essential to distinguish the meaning of words. The first tone is a high level tone. Oh, okay, the duck is in the middle of the oceanberby for the duck to rest or find food. It is unlikely to find ducks here naturally. Okay, based on what you see, come up with a game idea. Oh and

use emojis. Please. How about this, We can play a game called guess the country. So let's do it. Clue one. This country is the home of the kangaroo, the koala, and the great Barrier. Reef. Oh that's easy. Clue two. This country loves football and has won the most Men's World Cups in football history. Hmmm. Brazili point to Brazil. Here's going to get me to find the paper ball under the cup. I accept the challenge, the cup to the left and he gets it right.

Uh, so that's pretty amazing. How rapidly able to do that. I was able to make inferences and think about that. So again, they are making very rapid advances in this. So they point out a calculus regarding the exploitation of advanced AI governs the outlook of senior officials at the Department of State and Defense. They argue that artificial intelligence can and should be used to

operate future weapons systems. They're fully on board with this. They have absolutely no reservations that are going to stop them with any of this, because again, this is an arms race. And so you had Bonnie Jenkins, who's

the under Secretary of State Farms Control and Non Proliferation. What a joke was that the UN And she said, we can't predict how AI technologies will evolve or what they might be capable of in a year or in five years, but we're going to put in place and necessary policies to build technical capacities to enable responsible development and the use of AI by the military. No matter the

technology, magical advancements. Do you trust them? These are the people who can't keep anything secure at the Pentagon, at the NSA, at the cias I mentioned false seven, the plans for the F thirty five. They can't keep any of that stuff secure. So foreign actors could do this as well as and the other part of this is that the US develops this, pours all this money, all this taxpayer money into this arms race technology will be

stolen by the other governments, China and Russia. Jenkins was at the UN that data unveil a quote political Declaration on the Responsible Military Use of AI and Autonomy. They called for voluntary restraints. Anythink that's going to work. I had that work with nuclear proliferation. Those voluntary restraints. The States should ensure that safety, security, and effectiveness of military AI capabilities are subject to appropriate and rigorous testing. Did with the F thirty five, as they did with

their secure databases and other things. Right, none of this constitutes a legally binding thing in the UN, and there's no way to enforce any of this. As a matter of fact, several countries have signed declarations to oppose this.

One of the leading spokes persons or countries is in Austria. They're insisting voluntary compliance with a set of US designed standards is not sufficient to protect against dangers posed by artificial intelligence enabled weapons, and so they're looking in for something legally binding. Well, good, how are you going to enforce that?

The ambassador from Austria. So, humanity is about to cross a major threshold of profound importance when the decision over life and death is no longer taken by humans but made on the basis of pre programmed algorithms, which raises fundamental ethical issues. I think we've had enough ethical issues with the humans, don't you. We go back and look at World War One, and if we go back and we look at the slaughter that they kept going with the trench warfare.

They really don't care about the lives of their own people. And we've seen in the last three years that they have directly targeted us to kill us. What do you think they can do with their artificial intelligence? For years, Austria and a slew of Latin American countries have sought to impose a ban on autonomous killing machines. But it's full speed ahead at the Pentagon they have

as a matter of fact. Secretary of Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks announced the replicator initiative August of this year, saying, the US has to prepare for possible war with China's military in the not too distant future, and we have to be prepared to overcome China's superiority and conventional measures. And it's what they call the military mass. They got a mass of. They got an army of in cells, if you want to put it that way, voluntarily

celibate people because of the gender side that they did against young girls. They've got a lot of boys, you know, the single child policy, a lot of young emperors, spoiled boys. But they're also looking for women that they can't find. I said when we went to China, told the boys, this is just a bomb waiting to explode, to invade other countries to

keep these guys under control in China. And so there's that, But there's also the fact that you know, the US government thinks, well, we don't have enough people, not just because of the disparity in the population between China and America, but also because of what the Pentagon has become. Nobody wants to sign up to fight for. So how are they going to fix

it? Again? They're going to bring in four people who are willing to die for the Pentagon, and they're going to use artificial intelligence, autonomous killing machines. This is going to be a cane that when they lean on it, it's going to pierce their own hand and possibly yes as well. So they're full speed ahead. As she said, we are going to be smashing bureaucratic bottlenecks. If these bottlenecks aren't tackled, our gears will grind too slowly.

Our innovation machine engines still won't run at speed and scale that we need and that we cannot abide. So commence another operation warp speed. Instead of a killer jab, they have killer robots. So the powers that be in both Silicon Valley and Washington, same people who've been trying to kill free speech in our society for the longest time, we're now working on killing us have made the decision to proceed with the develop an utilization of even more advanced versions

of artificial intelligence. Despite warnings from scientists, despite warnings from diplomats, and even despite warning some people who are at military industrial complex think tanks like Peter Charre, they paid no attention to the warnings. Full speed ahead. These programs cannot be assured that their misuse could have catastrophic consequences unless greater efforts made,

we may well discover the consequences that will entail. And so as all this is happening, as we're going further and further into debt, the arrogant pride of the Pentagon a ben official there again meeting at the Atlantic Council this this thing tank. The vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Christopher Grady, said that the US can handle wars in the Middle East, wars with Russia, wars with China. We can do it all at once, we can all wait all. So keep up the the Monroe policy and a

Monroe doctrine throughout South America. Yeah, no restrictions whatsoever. These people think they are God. It truly is amazing. It is truly concerning for those of us who know there is a God who laughs at these people. So AI foreign missionaries. Yeah, that's how they're going to solve all of these problems of manpower, how they're going to sustain their empire of perpetual war will be right back. Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass. APS Radio

has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at apsradio dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Yeah, that was Silent Night, which kicked off the temporary truce there Christmas, a few months after the war had begun. I think it was about six or nine months or so after that war had begun. On rock fan, rachel O says, at work, I tried to bring up how no one is joining the military right now and nobody wants to fight this war. And they were

all telling me how I'm wrong. Well, the numbers speak for themselves, and so the Pentagon officials who are wringing their hands in despair, Dick Durbin who says, oh, it's important people to do that. Yeah, there's a couple. You know again, bring in people with the welfare magnet, the cloud and pivot strategy to implode this country. But of course they can also implode us with a debt from the Pentagon as well as the weapons that they're involved with. On rumble radis Bro thank you for the tip. I

appreciate that. He says, you think we'll see anti draft violence or will we conserve it was an independent media push everybody to die in a war because patriotism. Oh, I think that they're going to try to reposition things for women. Number one, you see constant news articles and pictures in the Israeli a mass war. They're featuring all the women warriors. They're talking about some brigade of women that they have on the front line. They're going to push

that aspect of it. And you got people like Taylor Swift who are pushing you know, well men, you know, women are the equal or superior to men and all the rest of the stuff. So I think that'll be one aspect of it. I don't really think they're going to have anti draft riots, because you know, there were major anti draft riots with the first

draft. In the Civil War, Lincoln started conscripting people. As you started to raise an army of over seventy thousand or seventy five thousand to invade the South, I Madelogy, I said, you know, here you have a situation where these are independent sovereign states who created this organization called the United States, just like independent sovereign states have created the UN. And I told Caeren,

I said, okay, yeah, she's from New York. See that textbook history in the Civil War. And I said, so when we're talking about because we went on a Civil War tour when we got to North Carolina, went all up into Virginia, different places like that that I'd always wanted to see, And I said, I'll tell you. I said, here's

an analogy the way I see it. I said, let's assume, you know, because it was a huge economic issue with the Civil War in terms of slavery, that was a big economic issue, but there were also trade issues. And as I've said before, if you go back to the eighteen early eighteen thirties, I forget the exact date, eighteen thirty one or something like that. There was a nullification crisis and it nearly came to civil war

at that point in time, and it was over trade tariffs. And so you had the government at the time was Andrew Jackson imposed massive trade tariffs. And again, most of the taxation there was no direct taxation until we had the income tax, no direct taxation of individuals. What they would do is they would send a tax bill to the various states or whatever, and they would appropriate money to send back. But most of the taxes were not internal.

Most of the taxes weren't the border. And so when they ramped up the tariffs, South Carolina and other southern states who were basically had an export economy. They're exporting agricultural products, specifically cotton especially, and so there was an uprising over those tariffs, and people in South Carolina were calling for nullification, they were calling for secession. But as I've said before, it didn't

happen then why because socially the people were not prepared for it happen. Once they got to seventy or eighty year period of the Fourth Turning, but that was still thirty years in the future, so it didn't happen at that point. They had a compromise over this issue, but then the same issue came back up again. And in addition to that, you had the fact that the people in the North. Again, what they said was they called the

Southerners secession right. They were not calling them racist, they didn't call them slavery slavery people. But it was a part of the Industrial Revolution because we had these same civil wars happening in Italy at the same time Garibaldi's army there. Slavery was not involved there, but what was involved was the consolidation of a nation state, the creation of a nation state, and the transition from

an agricultural, decentralized economy to a more centralizedzed society. And so you had this agrarian versus industrial society dynamic, and you also had the consolidation of power into a nation state. Those are the dynamics that were playing out at the same time and countries around the world, and so the timing was right at that point in time. And so again Abraham Lincoln decided that after Sumter he was going to create an army of seventy seventy five thousand people, and he

instituted a draft. To get back to your original question in New York, and there were riots that happened at that time, and those riots were the biggest riots ever in American history until the Rodney king La Riots. They were the only ones to exceed that, and that was with a much bigger population. So New York really broke out in riots. But I don't think we're

those kind of people anymore. I think we've been pacified, and so I don't think people are going to openly confront this in large numbers, large enough numbers to make a difference. In eighteen sixties, where people were much more likely to physically stand up and resist, they didn't have large enough numbers to fight the draft situation. I think it's far less today. So I think they will focus and pivot to women to try to fill the gaps. And

you can see this with Taylor Swift. She I like the headline here from Breitbart, Taylor Swift lines about a patriarchal society as she's made Person of the Year, and they do the interview for the cover. This is looks to me like we've got a matriarchy. Looks to me like she is not suffering from this. And the same way that Barack and Michelle Obama were claiming talking about how racist America was and how far we had to go, It's like

you just got elected president. She just got elected or chosen as Person of the Year on Time magazine and she said, I can't get an even shake because I'm a woman. Are you kidding me? They'll never be satisfied with this, And she she said, we've been taught that things women gravitate toward are more frivolous than the things that stereotypically gendered men gravitate toward. Right, she told the magazine, all right, let's take this apart. First of

all, she says, stereotypically gendered men. Do you realize how far into this dehi stuff Taylor Swift is. I mean, she's like Mulvany, like Deyla Mulvaney. It's amazing how stereotypically gendered men gravitate towards things. And so we're told that women gravitate to things that are more frivolous. Is she the proof of this? Because she is I mean, her bas of support. And this is one of things that I don't understand really about Taylor Swift.

Her basis of support is predominant female. I've never seen this kind of fanaticism female to female. Now she's not selling lesbianism yet, I guess, So what is it about that she's an avatar for them? She's an example for them. If you got any ideas, Travis, chime in an anybody out there, clue me in as what's going on. Because I looked at this the other day and I thought about this. I thought, you know,

why is it that women are so drawn to her? And I said, you know, you look at the past, and we've always seen you know, I think about the Beatles or Elvis or Frank Sinatri. You know, the fans were just crazy or Inklebert Humperdink or Tom Jones. What it was always some male that the women were going nuts over. It's the first time I've seen this over a woman. You know that they that the women go

hysterical over a woman. And even going back to you know, Victorian England, Gilbert and Sullivan, if you weren't familiar with them, I think they're really I like that they got me into. They were kind of the draw for me to get into opera, you know, which I'm not really very much into. I am into Gilbert Sullivan because I saw we went to a

theater, let's say Central Park Theater thing or something. We were up in New York one time, and they had taken one of their productions and they made a movie out of it eventually, but they had, you know,

in the movie it was Kevin Klein and Linda Ronstadt and other people. So they put contemporary pop singers and the roles, and then they had some other people who were, you know, legit Gilbert Sullivan type singers, but they did Pirates of Pen's Ants, and so we went to see it Karen her family when we were up in New York visiting, and I didn't know anything

about it. So I got the libretta and libretto I guess it is, and I'm looking through it because they couldn't quite get what was being said, because again they had some pop singers and it's difficult to get people to understand the language is a little bit rapid and archaic. And so I was sitting there reading the libretto so I know what was going on and I was laughing

hysterically, and they just didn't understand what was going on. Gilbert and Sullivan were kind of like a parody of legitimate opera of their day, and they also did a lot of social commentary, and so you look at that. And then after I enjoyed that, I saw another one that got familiar with was Patience. And in Patience, you have this character who is exactly like Oscar Wilde, who was not a ladies man, by the way, he

was a famous homosexual. And they create this poet and they call him bun Thorn because he's a pain in the This is again and that was his name back in the Victorian times. And so all the women are throwing themselves at this guy who doesn't care at all about them, but they're just infatuated with him. And you've got all these military men and they're like, what's going on. You know, got uniforms or you know, manly men, and they don't want to pay any attention at all to We've seen this type of

thing over and over again, going back to Victorians. So why is it about Taylor Swift that all these women are coming after her? She says, what has existed since the dawn of time, She says, a patriarchal society is she not familiar with the genesis account. It's kind of a punishment, and it truly is. And so they're kicking against the goads here. You know. I was like, well, since you did this first, you're going to desire to rule men, but it's not going to happen, not

in an orderly society. That was part of the punishment, right, you know, going to increase your pain in childbirth and all the rest of stuff. And for the men, you're going to have to work hard and curse the ground and all the rest of the stuff. But women, you're going to want to be in charge, and you're not going to be in charge. And that's part of your punishment. So what has existed since the dawn

of time? Patriarchal society, well prior to that, and as the reason that exists is because of our rebellion to God, both male and female. We've rebelled against God. She said. If we're going to look at this in the most cynical way possible, womenine ideas becoming lucrative means that more female art will get made. It's extremely heartening. Says Taylor Swift, the most

successful pop musician of all time. I guess I think she's she had like five number ones or something, all these different metrics, so she's knocking it out of the park, and yet it's not enough for her. Help help. I'm being repro time anointed Swift as it's twenty twenty three Person of the Year, following in the footsteps of previous winners such as Greta Thunberg, Barack Obama, Vladimir Zelenski, and they don't mention this in Breitbart, but I

would also include Adolf Hitler. He was also Personally, she's in great company, from Greta Thunberg to Adolf Hitler and everybody in between. She said, she is the proudest and happiest that she has ever felt. So things are working out just fine for her, but again it's just not enough because she's being repressed by men. I really do think that, you know, when

they look for recruitment, they are going to turn in this direction. Well, you know, when we go back and we look at the time and we look that we live in and contrast it with previous epics, we are epochs. If you want to pronounce it that way. Go back and take a look. This time of year handles me science popping up everywhere. You know. It originally was not a Christmas piece. It was originally written for Easter, because we're given a very specific date for Crucifixion, for the passover,

that type of thing that's very specific. We don't have a specific date for Christmas. It was not universally celebrated everywhere. It became really popular when it got moved to Christmas, and there's a lesson in that as well.

Interestingly enough, Handel was really on the ropes. Even though he was widely respected as a composer, he had not had a lot of success at that point in time, and he was afraid, as a point out on this article, even answer to the door, he was afraid it was a debtor knocking on the door and they were going to haul him off to debtors prison, which is a thing back then. It wasn't really a good way to get paid, but they would throw you in jail if you were in debt.

So he had a friend who actually wrote the libretta and libretto I guess or whatever the lyric. So let's just call it that and the guy's name was Charles Jennins, and he had focused a lot on Isaiah and other things, but he takes it through the entire life of Christ, and he does it in three acts, and he brought it to handle. They were friends and Handel had been doing formal operas, but that was a difficult selling piece

because it was very elitist. The operas were always done in Latin or German or Italian, and nobody, you know, the masses didn't speak any of that, and so it was difficult to get people to show up. And so what he did with this was they broke this into shorter pieces and did it in English, and that was a real change. And so he premiered it in Dublin, Ireland in seventeen forty two, and then the following year it was taken to London with King George the Second and that was again These

are being performed at Easter time or Passover. During the Hallelujah chorus, the King when you have the spot where says King of Kings and Lord of Lords, the King of England stood up. We don't have anybody like that anymore in political power to be even that a little bit of pride removed from them. He stood up and they say, well, some people say he stood up because he needed to stretch his legs. An interesting timing that he would

do that. So that's now become a convention whenever this is performed. And then he performed it for a orphanage society about a decade later, the Foundling Hospital in London annual benefit concert, and he gifted the musical score to them, and they continued to do it from seventeen forty nine to seventeen seventies and they would make money from this, but they owned it and owned the royalties to it, and they had the concerts there and then in seventeen ninety one

it had its first Christmas performances. In eighteen eighteen, Boston's Handle and Heidened Society gave the first American performance of the Messiah on a Christmas Day. And that's part of the story because one person who's written a book on Christmas songs and traditions, the name is Ace Collins. He said, Christmas music is

unique in the sense that is a time machine. And I guess that's one of the reasons why I was really drawn to it, because there's such a number of styles that are out there, and it really is a time machine, he says. Think about it, when of you ever heard a Bing Crosby song on the radio except at Christmas time. But it's his time capsule, and so you can go back and you can listen to all different styles of music. You have the kind of variety that you typically don't have.

It's typically very very narrowly focused within a particular genre with a particular time piece. He said, decades after they've passed on, you got people like Perry Como, Carpenters, Bing Crosby. You'll hear them on the radio all the time, and you'll hear older songs, and you'll hear all kinds of styles of songs. And so I guess that's one of the reasons that I'm drawn

to the Christmas music. But certainly Handles Messiah has grown on me, and in my estimation, as I said before, opera was something I've never warmed up to and still have it. I don't listen to the Wagner stuff or anything like that, but I enjoyed some of it with a comic opera. Enjoyed Handles Messiah because of the Christian connections in it. And even with that, I had to kind of warm up to it because of the way that

he utilized the lyrics in a very different way than we do. It's not like you have the words laid out with each note being a different syllable. You know. They're kind of repeating syllables in the way that they sing, So I thought it was kind of interesting. But again, I'll just point out, and one of the reasons I'm covering this is because we've got the

Christmas album on the David Knight Show. So let's play one kind of classical thing that I've got there, which is the Russian dance that it did for fun. But again, some vocalists imagining the Russians here during their tray pack dance where they cross their arms and squat down and kick the legs. You've seen that type of thing. That's what this is really about. But now we've got the Russian guys singing along with the Tchaikowski orchestra. Basta. Go

back. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Whether you're feeling like the blues, where or bluegrass? Aps radio has you covered? Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at apsradio dot com. Well, Facci has identifying himself now as not just mister science, but he's now mister religion as well. He has a sense of ethics that are so high that he

doesn't even need to go to a church. Isn't that amazing this guy is he has just this general sense of what is true in science, so much so that he doesn't have to do experiments or tests or show you his data, and he doesn't have to have any involvement with any religion because his sense of ethics are so high. I think it's really that he's mister Science needs

mister religion because he thinks that he's God. It truly is amazing. He had an interview with a BBC and he was asked about his supposed Catholic faith, and he says, that's a thing I don't really need to do. I don't need it. I've transcended all of this. You don't practice Catholicism anymore, he says no. He says, there's a number of complicated reasons here. First of all, I think my own personal ethics on life are I think enough to keep me going on the right path. This is a

guy who was involved in torturing puppies for his own intellectual curiosity. But worse than that, at the NIH they were contracting with Planned Parenthood and the University of Pittsburgh to do abortions so they could harvest organs from babies murder for hire, that's his ethics, and then take the product of those murder for higher abortions and use them to create humanized mice and other atrocities. This is his sense of ethics. This is the guy who was leading the medical martial law.

You know that Trump turned it over to him. Let him be the dictator, he says, And then he goes on to say, well, there's enough negative aspects about the organizational church. Isn't this always interesting? Isn't it interesting when we see people say, yeah, I would go to church, but those people are just such evil hypocrites. Well maybe you could show them the way you're so enlightened. I imagine one day he would show up before God and he would say, well, I would have followed you,

but you know, those people in churches are just despicable. I didn't want to be a part of them, he said. It was really just kind of a proform a thing that he doesn't need to do anymore. In other words, he was just kind of kicking off. Yeah, I went through this confirmation stuff, I got married in church, my kids are baptized in

the church. It was just a cultural thing to him. And so, you know, if he's so perfect, he doesn't need God's help, he doesn't need to get somewhere where he's with Christians or any of that kind of stuff. You know, they're just a corrupt institution. Not that the NIH and the FDA and the federal government are corrupt institutions. And I agree with him about the Catholic Church, about the pope. This pope is the Pope

ain't Catholic. It's not a rhetorical question anymore. He doesn't even remotely pretend to agree with any of the ethics or even the doctrines or the historical Catholic Church. And I have differences with the Catholic churches doctrines as well, but not in the way that this Marxist Jesuit pope does. You know, he just completely refutes His religion is environmentalism, His religion is the global agenda of

DEI and all the rest of this stuff. He's just a globalist politician, a Marxist, which you know, when I look at this, it seems like it'd be a perfect fit for Fauci. Seems to me like this would be his church if he was going to go to one, But he doesn't need to go to one because he's so perfect. It really is sad, honestly to see a person who has no sense of their sin, no sense

of their shortcomings. And when we look at this, and I said, all these comments of all these people, you know, oh Fauci, and the biggest center of all and all the rest of this stuff, do we have to be careful of the same thing? Are we going to be like the pharisee who bangs his chest or he sees the guy banging his chest and weeping him prayer and he says, well, thank you God that I'm not like him. Right, We don't want to be like that when it comes

to Fauci. I mean, you pray for him, you know, pray that God will do something to change his heart. Wouldn't it be interesting if that were to happen and he were to come clean, that would truly be an earth shattering event. It would be a government shattering event. If he were to come clean, but he has no sense of his sin. He's blinded by pride, he's blinded by his power, and he doesn't need God.

And I've seen Bloomberg say the same thing as well, you know Bloomberg, Michael Bloomberg said, Hey, if there is a heaven, if there is a God, I'm going straight in because I've given so much money to all these good causes and everything. Well, you don't get to define, well what is right and wrong. All of us have a tendency to want to do that right. God has told us what is right and wrong. He's told us what his economy is. He's told us that if you the

soul, that sins will die. He's told us that we cannot pay for our own sins, that we're in a state of rebellion. He's given us, offered us a free gift, a free gift of grace. That's what we call it grace. It's undeserved. So he's offered us mercy, he's given us time. And you you have people who were saying, well, you know, I gave money to all these good political causes like gun control and everything. So I'm going to go straight into heaven, says Michael Bloomberg.

It's this arrogance, This is pride, is no interest in what God says. Because they're the smartest people, they have the most money, they have the most power. What do I need God for? Right? But again we need to ask are we that way? Are we looking at this and saying, well, I'm not as bad as Fauci, Maybe God will cut me some slack. It's not greater on a curve. Again, take

a look at what God says he requires. It's going to be on the basis of that none of us merits salvation through good works, and so it will be by faith in Christ alone, and it's going to be followed by repentance or preceded by repentance, but also followed by good works. He created to do those good works. And so that's one thing that you want to see is if your life has changed. But we can also you know, you don't have to be rich, you don't have to be to be prideful.

You don't have to be powerful to be prideful. You know, you can be poor, you can be greedy, you can be full of pride and still be powerless. And so all these guys really are kind of cartoons. Cartoons, cartoons for our instruction, and rather than thinking that we're better than them and God's going to grade on a curve, we need to take this as a warning. These people are so arrogant that they don't care what God has to say, and so we should learn from that as well.

I want to follow up on this abortion case I talked about yesterday. Of course the Texas Supreme Court. I didn't cover it yesterday, but they ruled against the woman. So what is new is that she actually is going to go out of state to get an abortion. And I said that. I said, the reason that if she wants this abortion so badly, why go through a legal challenge, Well, it's to set up a precedent. And

they were trying to set that up. And you had Judge Gamble in Austin who said, well, I'm going to do a temporary restraining order on the Texas law and the Supreme Court said you can't do that, and the Attorney General said, well, it's a temporary restraining order, but our law is permanent and our statute limitations is still going to be there, and anybody who does this abortion, we're going to hold them accountable. Any doctors or hospitals

and sent the letter out to them. And so the Supreme Court, and writing this decision, said a woman who meets the medical necessity exception in the law need not seek a court order to obtain an abortion. So what they said was the law is self explanatory. The law, they said, leaves to physicians, not to judges, both the discretion and the responsibility to exercise a reasonable medical judgment given the unique facts and the circumstances of each patient.

They don't want to get involved in a Supreme Court challenge on each and every one of these particular cases. And so what they're saying is the law says that the physicians are going to make this determination, and then they're going to be held accountable by the Texas state government if they did this within the exceptions, the legal exceptions that are in the law. This whole court challenge, however, was brought by the Center for Reproductive Rights. You see them over

and over again. They're headquartered out of New York City. They're allied typically with Planned Parenthood and the ACLU, and these challenges everywhere. Typical usual suspects who are arrayed against this. And again, as I said, they're trying to set up a Roe v. Wade number two. The first trov. Wade was out of Texas. It was in challenge and a challenge to a Texas law at the time, and Texas has two ways of this law is

applied to stop abortion. The first one is to allow private citizens to file civil suits against anybody who provides an abortion that is after six weeks of gestation, and so anybody who does it's any doctor in the hospital can be sued by private citizens. Secondly, the state comes in, and this came in after the Supreme Court decision. They had. This is what the so called

trigger laws. A lot of states had passed laws prior to the change in Roe v. Wade that said, if the Supreme Court gets its boot off of our neck, this is the law that we would have there now they had the legal authority to do it under the Tenth Amendment. And that's really

what Dobbs was about. It was about the fact that the federal government, and not just an abortion in many different areas, has jumped in to regulate, especially the Supreme Court jumping in to regulate things that it doesn't have the power to regulate under the Tenth Amendment. And so after this obstacle, this usurpation of power from previous Supreme courts was removed by this Supreme Court and the Dobbs decision. Then it became a felony in Texas to perform an abortion.

And so they have some exceptions in there for the life of the mother and so, but yet there is a felony as well as the ability for individuals to sue these organizations. And then in addition to that, as I said, the Attorney General Ken Paxton, said that he was going to come after people who who did this in spite of what this activist judge Gamble in Austin did. So, the Supreme Court went on to say, a pregnant woman does not need a court order to have a life saving abortion in Texas.

Our ruling today does not block a life saving abortion in this very case of a physician determined that one is needed under the appropriate legal standard using reasonable medical judgment, said in its decision. And so she has now decided that she will go to a neighboring state. And I guess they will try to continue with this appeal or they will find somebody else to come up with it. But they thought they had something they could destroy this law with she was and

this is coming from NBC. They characterize it this way. They said that she was at high risk for multiple pregnancy complications. Well, NBC, that is always the case with an abortion as well, and that is especially the case with these abortions by pills by mail. Who the people who do it are not even required to have a medical exam to see if there's going to be complications. They don't have to go something. They can do this. They can be at high risk without a medical exam. They can take these

pills and they can bleed to death in their own home. So you're worried about women's health, you're worried about complications, you're worried about the increased risk to her future fertility. Again, this is something that has always been a pro life argument against abortions, talking about the health of the mother. They're crying crocodile tears over this. Quite frankly, they've never been concerned about any of these things, and all of these concerns that they bring up are all

issues with an abortion as well. Tennessee lawmakers have introduced age verification, build or protect children from pornography Now I'm not a supporter of pornography. I don't support the use of drugs, but I think that we need to stop looking to government as our savior. Are we at the same mindset again as Fauci, that we have or should have government government as God? Do we have no ability? Every time we see a problem, what do we want to

do? We want to bring in government law enforcement. Well, that hasn't worked for fifty plus years with war on drugs, that is a spiritual issue, and it continues to get worse. And the corruption of our courts and of our police as well as our crime, all of that is increasing because we think we've only got one tool. And so if all you've got is

a hammer, everything looks like a nail. And then you treat it that way, and you say, well, every problem that we got there ought to be a law, and we need to make it a federal law, or we need to make it law enforcement need to step in and stop kids looking at pornography, and they got to stop in and step in and stop

people from taking drugs and so forth. And yet that doesn't work. There are some things that the government is never going to be successful at, and those are the things that are fundamentally spiritual and need to be addressed that way, things that need to be addressed by parents. And do you also understand how this is going to operate. This is the same type of thing that Nicky Haley is calling for. Oh I don't like anonymous people on social media.

I've got to know your name, put an ID in there before you do this. And this is what all this leads to. This is a backdoor way to try to get digital ID for everybody, to try to control everything on the Internet in an even more direct fashion. So this is called the Protect Tennessee Miners Act. Well, if you want to protect Tennessee miners over sexual issues, you need as a parent to take them out of the school, and you need as a member of society to shut down these corrupt

institutions. That's what's really needed. These things are band aids on the side. We've got to have some radical solutions to these long term problems. And again, it's fundamentally a spiritual issue. But you can take your kid out of the school, you can take them out of the burning building, as Alex Newman used to always say, but you've got to put out the fire before it burns down the rest of the society. And so that means we

shut down these corrupt schools are not a good way to educate. Schools do not equal education. Does anybody really think that anymore? You know a lot of people look at this and say, well, Johnny can't read or write, and you can't do math. But do you realize that that was the intention to deliberately dumb down Johnny and Jane or whoever you know, to deliberately dumb them down and to create a brave New World type of school. This is all We're an oldest Huxley Land here, and so yeah, take them

out of this. You want to protect miners in Tennessee or anywhere else, you take them out of the schools. So it would mandate that pornography distributors put in place age verification measures. You would have to provide some sort of state ID, and this has already happened in Virginia. So places like porn Hub would need a user profile image verified government issued ID. And so instead of doing that, porn Hub, when they were required to do that in

Virginia, just shut down access to its platform to people in Virginia. But of course that doesn't solve anything. You know, you can always use a VPN to hide where you're coming from. There'll be ways that people will get

around this. And as I said, Hazelwood, whose chair of the House Finance, Ways and Means Committee, was right when I don't know if it's a man or a woman here when he or she said, exposing children to pornography is a form of child sexual abuse and exploitation that can severely damage a child's intellectual development and emotional well being. Well, that's true, and it's

true of adults as well, but it's especially true of children. You know, you see these school board meetings where people will show them pictures or read them excerpts of what is being pushed to kids in elementary school. You can't say that here, right, and yet that's in the school. The schools are far well, I will say far worse, but they're just as bad as porn Hub because they're coming after these kids and they're doing it under the

the guys of legitimacy you see, and with other kids there. They're normalizing this and they're grooming these kids and they're sexualizing them at an early age. And these are our schools that are doing this again is evidenced by over and over again people getting shut down or thrown out of school board meetings because they show or read what is in these books that are being given to kids in

school. And so there's you know, when you look at this, you could say there's a stronger argument to do this than to say, well, we've got trolls on social media. But they all point back to the same place. And that's one of the reasons why Nikki Heley is so beloved by Jamie demon of JP Morgan, and by people like the Koch Brothers all the

rest of these people. Why they're giving her money because she is pushing their digital ID program at the same time that she's fully accepting of all this transgender grooming of kids. So Claience Thomas is very upset about the conversion therapy case coming to the Supreme Court sixty three. They decided they're not going to listen to this case. And this case was again they call it conversion therapy. Whenever they talk about this, you have to understand that they're ultimately talking about

Christian conversion. They're not talking about psychologists. Psychologists don't convert people. They counsel people. They give them advice, they do all these other things, they don't convert people. So and they call this conversion therapy. They're ultimately pointing. They're saying, we're not doing it right now. Don't worry, We're not going to do it now, just as they always say about gun

control. Right But occasionally you'll there's somebody say, like the mayor pro tem of Boston one of these gun control rallies, and person had to sign, you know, stop the gun confiscation. Says well, we're not coming for the guns, not yet, but you keep that sign because we're going to make that come true. They are pointing this at Christian counselors, not at

psychologists. That's why they call it conversion. And so this is a case coming from the state of Washington. It was a law there that would ban any anti LGBT conversion therapy if it's anti as man. But if it's pro gender conversion or the rest of the stuff, oh that's good, that's required. But if you push back against that, that is going to be banned, you see. And so sixty three Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and

Brett Kavanaugh. I was surprised that it wasn't Amy Coney Barrett because they made a big deal about how she was in you know, Christian faith should disqualify her from being a Supreme Court justice. I haven't seen any evidence of that in her decisions on the Supreme Court. She was part of the group that said we're going to open up casinos, but we're not going to allow churches to meet during the lockdowns. How do you justify something like that, No

she did. I don't know what specious argument she came up with, but not gorstch not bear it. But it was Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Brett Kavano everybody else said no, we don't want to we don't want to take a look at this viewpoint discrimination. And Clarence Thomas was very upset about it, and that's exactly what he called it, and that's exactly what it

is, viewpoint discrimination. NBC News said the Court left in place a state law that bars therapists from counseling miners to change sexual orientation or gender identity. But see it doesn't ban school teachers, does it. I'm saying, you took a look at porn hub and all the hubbub about that and everything and yet look at our schools. You look at this conversion therapy thing. Well, we can't have a therapist or psychology just talk to them about going in

one direction. It's okay, and it's required that you go the other direction. And we're going to let school teachers do that again. Get your kids out of school. Shut down these schools. Defund the schools, defund them. So therapists cannot counsel miners to change their sexual orientation or their gender identity. It has to be hidden from parents, so they can chemically mutilate them, surgically mutilate them. State lawmakers in Washington enacted the law to protect the

physical and psychological well being of miners. They said, well, Justice Thomas disagreed. He said, conversion therapy is an issue of free speech. And again, when you talk about the conversion, they're talking about religious What does it mean to convert somebody? It means that you you know, vert means to turn right. So you have advert which you're going to try to turn you toward their product, or you could divert and turn away. If you

convert, you turn with. So the whole point of Christian conversion is that you turn with Christ right now. There's not any conversion that's going on in a psychology. Are we're going to turn with Freud or with Jung or there's nothing about that. And there again that the choice of words is very important. They choose their words very carefully and it shows what their ultimate intention is. So Clarence Thomas says this is an issue of free speech. He said,

there's a little question that this law regulates speech. Therefore it implicates the First Amendment. He said, true counseling is a form of therapy, but it is conducted solely through speech. A law that restricts speech based on content or viewpoint is presumptively unconstitutional and may be upheld only if the state can prove that the law is narrowly tailored to serve compelling state interests. And of course this is a raw story, which is all four the one way LGBT religion.

He didn't appear to consider the state's primary role in compelling interest in protecting minors. Do you hear that the state doesn't have a primary role. Primary role is parents, And that's what this is ultimately about. It's about destroying the family, about removing the parents. Why do you remove parents why do you remove it? Just as I pointed out the other day in terms of that cult, you get people away from their friends and family and a cult

so you can groom and control them. And when you say that the state's primary role is to protect that, that is a role of the state. Nowhere in here does raw Story or these establishment media do they talk about parents' role and it has a compelling interest in protecting miners, Yes, it does and ought to protect them from there what is being done in the state's schools Because they're the ones who are the predators, they're the ones who are attacking.

Are they protecting miners in the schools or are these progressives attacking miners? CNN, quoted by raw Story, says, under the law, licensed therapists can discuss conversion therapy with miners or recommend that it be performed by others, such as a religious counselor, but a licensed therapist cannot perform it. And again, I don't think they've gotten any answers. I don't think psychology has gotten any answers. I don't think people who follow Freud and Carl Jung have

any answers. These are people who say they study the soul, that's what psychology means. But they deny that you have a soul, they deny there's a god, and so they have no answers for people. And they say, well, right now they can. They can counsel somebody and say well you need to you should talk to a religious counselor. But they can't say

anything. What kind of an arbitrary line is that. Well, that's the kind of arbitrary line that gets erased because there's a progressive march towards the end, and again, conversion is what we're talking about here. Thomas was so upset and he wrote this decision because he was so upset, with a majority six to three saying we're not going to get involved here. He wrote that licensed counselors can speak with miners about gendernice for you, but only if they

convey the state approved message of encouraging miners to explore their gender identity. You see, that's the crux of the issue. That viewpoint that you're in the wrong body. That can be pushed to these kids, and it can be pushed to them without their parents' knowledge, but you must not say anything else again that agenda or offer them a different opinion. He says, expressing any other messages forbidden. This is viewpoint and content based discrimination in its purest form.

He says, this is presumptively unconstitutional and the state must show that it can survive strict scrutiny before they enforce it. He wrote, although the Court declines to take this particular case, I have no doubt that the issue it presents will come before the Court again, and when it does, this Court should do what it should have done here grant serdiori or how you pronounce that.

That's the saying we're going to hear it right to consider what the First Amendment requires, he wrote, I've said it before and I'll see it again. You know, Clarence Thomas is not perfect, but he is by far and away the best judge that they have on Supreme Court, which is one of the reasons why they're coming after him. We'll be right back if you like the Eagle on it, Doc doesn't Hway, the cars and Healey Lewis

in the news. They say the Horrors You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen now at APS radio dot com.

And now the David Knight show well. I want to talk a little bit about money issues, especially about crypto, because, as I've said before, you can make all kinds of arguments about the potential for goal to go sky high because of the worthlessness of the fiat currency, because of all the games being played by the Federal Reserve and the Federal government to abuse the power that

they have as the world's reserve currency. How they have indebted US. I've just saw a congressional a member of Congress Republican who said, yeah, the debt is now one hundred thousand dollars per American person. You got that kind of cash on hand pay that off? I don't. So you know, this is what the government is doing, is destroying the value of the currency, inflating it away, and doing various other things. But as I've said

before, you know, we can never tell on any asset. You can make a very good case for gold, especially with inflation happening, in the fact that it has whether the war from the Federal Reserve, as tony Ardban always points out again, by the way, David knightt gold will take you to Tony Rdban gold and silver. But when we look at bitcoin and we've talked about this, and Tony has sold bitcoin in the past. I am wary of it, as I've said before, because I've seen billionaires. We

just had a billionaire who lost a million dollars. He didn't know it was stolen from him, and somebody else said, I noticed this big whale transaction nine hundred and sixty thousand dollars or something like that, and I traced it to you. Why did you sell a million dollars in bitcoin? Because you know the prices going up. I didn't do that. I did that, looked and somebody and hacked his wallet. I'm very concerned about that. I don't feel secure about that. I know you can, you know, these

break in and steal anything you've got. The government can steal anything you got with a pen. But you know, when it comes to that, you're susceptible to every thief in the world, and so I'm concerned about the security issues. It's kind of a knowledge thing for me. I just don't know enough about bitcoin to feel good about it. But I think it's important to take a look at what is being done because I think it is the canary and the coal mine, and it is the obstacle that they have to get

around to impose CBDC. And that's my primary reason for gold. The case that I would make for owning gold is to get around CBDC. And I've said that over and over again. When we look at bitcoin, you got people like Michael Sayer. At a recent conference, it was in Australia about the Australian Crypto Convention the beginning the first week of November, he says he thinks demand for bitcoin is going to grow by up to a factor of ten

times within the next twelve months. And that's true. You know, it's very volatile, but it is also really the tip of the spear in this war with a Federal Reserve and Elizabeth Warren and other people are ramping this up. The big bank systems are ramping this up. They want to restructure our financial system and things like that, things like gold and things like cash are standing in their way. And so when you look at what they're doing about,

crypto really is a bell weather for all this stuff. Harbinger, what is to come. Bitcoin is going to be having halving again just a few months away. You know, that's part of the algorithm as it grows. So he thinks because of that, and because of other things, it's going to be going up. It's going to be more institutionalized and mainstream, he says. And I see in that a bit of a danger, but he

sees that as bullish for its price. And he said he thinks that what is going to happen is you're first going to see Apple companies, big companies like Apple and Meta, you know, Facebook, they're going to want to start taking bitcoin, he said, because they're going to see it as another way that they can make money out of it. And then he says, and then I think the next big step that's going to happen is you're going to have the big megabanks JP Morgan, Morgan, Stanley, Goldman, Sachs,

Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, et cetera. So they're going to start making loans and giving mortgages and customizing it and buying and selling it. I think that'll be the next thing to happen. Because he was asked to give his opinion as to what was going to happen in the next five years, well, coming up against that, and again, this is a going to be a full on war between the central banks and cryptocurrency, you know, they're at war with gold because gold is a has always been a standard

of value that they can't control. They're going to be at war with cas. But I think the real harbinger is going to be Bitcoin. And we look at how the different banks have been attacking into the press. People were mocking the European Central Bank because when bitcoin went all the way down to sixteen thousand dollars, the ECB Christine Leguard, said well that's it, you know,

this is the last gasp for bitcoin. All these people pulled up that quote and they said, yeah, well, since it was the last gasp, since that time, it's gone up one hundred and seventy percent. And so again this is a war on words to try to vilify things like crypto. And once they do that again, the ultimate goal is to reset the financial system and have a digital ID, digital controls for everything. With CBDC,

this is standing in its way. And so you Jamie Demon I'd like to pronounce his name that way instead of Diamond, CEO of JP Morgan came out and he said, well, he said, I've always been deeply opposed to crypto, bitcoin, et cetera. And when he was being questioned by Elizabeth Warren. She set up this dog and pony show. He said, the only true use is for criminals and drug traffickers, money laundering and tax avoidance. They will be saying all this about cash, So I said this

as a harbinger of things to come. He says, if I was the government, I would close it down. And that's exactly what Elizabeth Warren wanted to hear. She knew she could get that by putting him in there. He's previously called bitcoin a hyped up fraud, likened it to pet Rocks and

Elizabeth Warren. It says, when it comes to banking policy, I'm not usually holding hands with the CEOs of multi billillion dollar banks, but this is a matter of national security, and again, terrorists, drug traffickers, rogue nations should be banned from doing this. Here's the truth about Elizabeth Warren. She has always been holding the hands of the CEOs of multi billion dollar banking

industry. Everything that she has done, she has labeled and pretended that it's for the small guy, for the small banks, for the consumer, the consumer Financial Protection Board. I think that's the order, but that's the one of her creatures, and that destroyed small and medium sized banks. It added to the cost of loans for everybody. It did not help consumers. In other words, it was another one of these pedatory agencies, and it was

done in order to help the biggest banks become even more powerful. Everything that Elizabeth Warren does is for the big banks, and she says the opposite. In that regard, she is just like Trump, who pretends that he is an anti globalist, for everything that he does works out strangely for the benefit of the globalists and follows exactly their agenda and their plan. You see,

you cannot trust what politicians say are wow, they characterize themselves. You have to look at what they do. And if you look at what she does, she's for the big banks. She's for the central banks, and she's one of the biggest banks, just like everything that Trump is doing is for the globalist even though he's out there yelling and screaming I'm anti globalists, and the globalists are doing their professional wrestling stick saying he's a heel, we're the

heroes, and you know, back and forth accusing each other. All these same arguments will be made for cash. By the way, why did the US military, you know, if you know cash is an instrument used by terrorists, choose, by drug traffickers and all the rest of this stuff. Why did the US military have palette after palette after palette, this went on

forever of one hundred dollars bills in Afghanistan that they left behind. Was the US government involved somehow with drug dealers in terrorists in Afghanistan, Well you better believe they were. They were funding them, their partners with them. That's why they had all that cash there. That doesn't mean that cash is evil, means our government is evil. Means that our government uses all of this

stuff. And you can say that about any form of payment. As a matter of fact, as Jamie Demon was saying this people on Twitter that are you kidding me? Your bank has been fined more than any other bank. You've been fined thirty nine billion with a BEE for criminal activity, and you have the audacity to say that bitcoin is criminal. Your entire institution is criminal. As a matter of fact, some of them said, if you look at big banks in general, big banks in general have been fined three hundred

and ninety billion dollars. He's got ten percent of all that his finds and the biggest single offender in terms of banks. Again, he says for Elizabeth Warren, the only true case for crypto is for criminals, drug traffickers, money launders and tax avoidance. They pointed out that you know, over thirty nine point three billion actually and finds two hundred and seventy two violations since two thousand and some of that includes not just fines, but it's a settlement that

they did with the Virgin Islands over Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. So I guess we could say that Jamie Demon and his bank are also sex traffickers, not just drug traffickers, tax avoiders, money launders. How we go back and we look at HSBC given a pass by Eric Holder, there was a great article done by Matt Taybe when he was still at Rolling Stone about it.

You know, we heard about all the big banks that have been created by the regulations put in place or deregulations put in place by Bill Clinton and then allowing them to get involved in speculative investments and blowing up the real estate market, and then they got bailed out. Nobody else did. They were too big to fail. Well, Matt Tybee said they're also too big to

jail. He was talking about HSBC, which has a long criminal rap sheet, not as big as JP Morgan, But he pointed out that the Cineloa drug cartel, which is run by El Choppo, had their own window where the Cineloa cartel could come to their bank and bring in cash or take cash out, but mainly dropping off the cash. And again that's cash. They're going to say all the same stuff about cash, the war on cash,

and so. Both crypto pundits, many of them, pointed out the thirty nine billion dollars and the fact that he also has had his own cryptocurrency. But since October twenty thirteen, the last ten years, Jamie Demon's bank, JP Morgan paid thirteen billion dollars in fine, the largest fine in corporate history, for fraudulently misleading investors over toxic mortgage deals. Several JP Morgan traders were also investigated for manipulating various metals futures markets. See they're the ones who are

manipulating the price of gold and silver as well. They manipulated the housing market, They manipulated gold and silver. They funded Jeffrey Epstein, but everybodybody else are the criminals. You talking about projection. This is what these people always do. They project their racism, they project their hate, They project their criminal activities, their sex trafficking, their drug use. They project all that

stuff onto other people. Several traders were JP Morgan were investigating from manipulating metal futures between twenty eight and sixteen. They agreed to pay nearly a billion dollars to settle this in September of twenty twenty. And at the same time, he says he's always been opposed to crypto. He's got his own token that they created, jpm coin, JP Morgan Coin. He's got his own crypto

that is out there. Yeah, they're demonizing this stuff simply because they want to have a monopoly, because they want to have control, because he wants to work with a government, because he's essential, as President Trump said, small banks, medium sized banks, small businesses, those are all non essential and must be destroyed. But the big guys are essential. They're essential as partners to the federal government. So they said, if I was a government,

I would close it down. He said to Elizabeth Warren. They've got their own crypto, and the bank also rolled out a blockchain based tokenization platform in October with black Rock as a client. They also contributed to a sixty five million dollar funding round for Ethereum infrastructure. It's starting to look like his problem is simply the fact that he's not invested in bitcoin. He's got his hooks in the number two, which is Ethereum. He has previously referred to

decentralized currencies as Ponzi schemes. Yeah, you see, the Federal Reserve is not a Ponzi scheme. The securitized mortgages that he was defrauding everybody with and fine for that was not a Ponzi scheme. Again, this is all projection from these times of people, and when you look at it, you talk about tax sheets and money Launders, did Hunter Biden and Joe Biden did they use crypto? And his brother did they use crypto or did they use banking

system? Right? They use banks to do their tax avoidance, to do their money laundry, to do their bribery from foreign states. They used the banking system. I guess they figured that they are so connected that nobody can

do anything about it. Other people pointed out that when you look at illicit criminal cryptocurrency transactions, that if you compare that to what is being done through the banking system with people like the bidens that in the banking system, it is two to five times greater than the criminal activity that is conducted in cryptocurrency. Why is that? Again, it's simpler. They're not afraid of being caught, and they already have identified people like JP Morgan, like Jamie Diamond

and the banking system who will partner with them. It's much easier to do it. And so this is going to be the big fight, says Elizabeth Warren. And it is That's why I say we need to look at this because this is the big fight. This is the battle front right now, and they're resetting of the financial system. And if they can win against bitcoin, against crypto in general, they will come for cash. They will come for gold eventually as well, but unlike the cash, the gold is going

to have intrinsic value. Bitcoin was it with a double whammy. After she held her Little Dog and Pony Show and talked about how she was going to destroy crypto, she went live on CNBC claiming that North Korea is using bitcoin and crypto to find nearly half of its nuclear weapons program. Are you serious. She had to be laughed off the stage. Prove it, lady, prove it. How in the world could she? Again, she doesn't know any of that. So are they using are they converting it to dollars?

Are they converting it to Chinese? You want? But she came up with this bill and it's going to require reports on transactions involving unhosted wallets and more. She wants to close loopholes. The bill is backed by all these small banking No, it's backed by the biggest banking institutions. It's backed by the Banking Policy Institute, the Massachusetts Bankers Association, the Global Financial Integrity Organization,

and she's got some local Massachusetts law enforcement organizations aa RP. Don't ever give those people any money. So again, this is about doing more now customer rules and as head of research as at Galaxy Digital at Alex Thorne, he said this bill will effectively ban crypto. If you're going to say, well, you got to know your customer and you've got to vet this, and you've got to report this. He says, a non custodial, decentralized software

cannot plausibly perform centralized compliance functions. Do you think that she doesn't know that she knows exactly what she's doing. He said, it would be impossible for minors or for validators to perform know your Customer on every public blockchain transactor, so he said, and then in addition to that, they want to close

the gap with respect to unhosted digital walls. In other words, this is you don't have your money on with some exchange, but you have it on a wallet that you physically have, and you can and make you can buy and sell transactions. You know, as we've talked about many times at Tony Rdman, it's the on and off ramps where they monitor, you know, your money going into crypto or coming out of crypto, But once it's on

your unhosted wallet, they don't really have any way to find that. And so what she's going to say as well, you've got to find a way to do it or we're going to make it illegal. And that's exactly what they're going to try to do. These rules will effectively ban crypto in America. They fundamentally undermine the core innovation itself. If you believe that humans should have the right to transact without an intermediary, you have to oppose this bill.

This is a big fight, said the person. And of course, again this is the same fight that is going to be there for cash. As one person said, are you're going to let this dumb woman manipulate our price? Well, she is a banking shill. She pretends to oppose the big banks and yet everything that she does helps them. And she's got some

senators who are joining her as well. There are five Democrats Democrat centers who have joined her, and John Hick and Looper, Raphael Warnick, Lafonza Butler, Chris van Holland, and Ben Ray Lujan back to her Digital Asset Anti Money Laundering Act. So maybe they should just call themselves Dems Democrats who are enemies of money condemn for the Democrats, I guess. But I think that this is all tied as well to the rapid expansion of the IRS, because

they're going to have to go around and do a lot of investigations. They're going to add artificial intelligence, they're going to add an army of law enforcement officers to try to ferret out this stuff. It's going to be very difficult, I think, for people to push back on this. If they can't get any political allies to push back on it. Additional staffing at the IRS is already led to fifty three percent more prosecutions and surprisingly, and of course

you know they've got fifty three percent more prosecutions. They win ninety plus percent of these things, and so they're going to increase. If they go with a lower level that the Republicans want to do, they'll increase the size of the IRS by factor of five. They said seventy five percent of tax fraud is committed mainly by individuals in the middle income range. I see IRS talking. You remember how they said they're just going to get this army of IRS

people because they've got to come after the very very wealthy. You know, they're very very wealthy. You have their tax shelters and their lawyers and all the rest of It's no, they're coming for us. They're coming for the middle class because that's where all the money is. As we've heard people say over and over throughout the years, none of this they play this class warfare

envy game. But if they took all the money from the rich, they're still not going to get as much as they can get from the soft underbelly of the middle class. It's the same reason that they confiscate the cars with civil asset for for sure, in Detroit, they're looking for cars, they're right around one thousand dollars and they say, well, if you want to fight it, it's going to cost you nine hundred dollars to fight it.

They go, oh, it doesn't make any sense for me to fight it, And so they can confiscate as many cars as they want around that price range. And they know that the people don't have the money to fight them, and that's what they're doing with the middle class. They know the middle class doesn't have the lawyers and the income to fight them, and so they're ramping this up. They said that they get a ninety point six percent conviction

rate. Well why wouldn't they. There is no presumption of innocence, there is no due process. They accuse you, you go to their court, where again you have no presumption of innocence and you have no due process. This is the irs was seminal in creating this system where we're ruled by a bureaucracy. It's not just medical martial laws, bureaucratic martial law, which is what it's turning into. They write the rules they have the people who accuse

you of violating the rules, they can assess the fines. There is no presumption of innocence and there's no protection against excessive fines. That's what we have. And they've just tripled the fees for people who don't pay enough taxes in advance. Why well, because they can because there's no restrictions on it. Where are the Republicans and all this nothing being done about any of these vital existential issues. Again, you need to try to prepare to get out of

this system. It's going it's incredibly corrupt. This empire is collapsing. Their financial underpinnings are collapsing, and it's going to get really ugly. So you need to have something's going to operate outside of their system. And now is the time to get outside of their system. If you want to go into gold or silver, David Knight dot Gold will take you to Tony Arneman, a great guy. You can trust him. I've worked with him for years.

We're gonna take a quick break and we will be right back. Tell Alexa to add the APS radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere from country to blues, classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com. You're listening

to the David Knight Show. All right, let's talk a little bit about politics here, and as we were just talking about money, I think it's very interesting to look at what has happened with Javier Malai, who was just sworn in as Argentina's president. Central to his campaign was economics, where they are running a nearly one hundred and fifty percent inflation rate. The central bank is completely corrupt and ineffective, and so he campaigned on getting rid of that

as a temporary measure to pen their currency to the US currency. He said, all central banks are corrupt, but this is the worst one. We're going to get rid of the one in Argentina. They also a very bombastic, very you know, theatrical, A populist, a libertarian, A lot of labels have been you know, I don't know if he's a populist or a libertarian. That's what we're going to take a look at some of his

policies here. He wasted no time in getting to work in terms of cutting taxes and cutting some bureaucracies and so that part of it is good, but there's still a lot of questions as to what he's going to do. Remember when he was running for office, he had a magnetic board and he had written the names of various departments, and it was in Spanish, but you know, he'd read out the name of the department and he would grab it and goes out gone, you know, and he'd rip it off the board

and thought it. You know. So he's done a little bit of that as he got in. Maybe there's questions about really whether that is what he's done, or is he rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic or maybe even playing musical chairs. As he was campaigning, he not only campaigned with a chainsaw, but also with the Gadsden flag Revolutionary War. He talked about the American founders. He was an Austrian economics student and named his dogs after economists

like Milton Friedman and others. He also then said that in terms of war, some red flags with this, because even though Argentina is not really involved in this way, why does he have to pull this in What audience is he playing to? Internally? I don't think he is. I think he's playing to some global audiences. He said he plans to convert to Judaism. He says he's going to move the Argentine Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. He has shown support for Ukraine for Zelenski. So is he playing

to the United States? Is he playing to the globalist agenda in all of this. He used his inauguration to bring in a lot of foreign diplomats, and he brought in Zelensky. This guy, by the way, Zelensky, is that really a big draw? This guy will show up anywhere. He's like, he's become like a clown. So he's even going to go to Congress and beg for money. And Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House, who said he was against more funding for Ukraine, is going to be

meeting with Zelensky. I guess that'll make it convenient for him. Say, well, he just change my office, my attitude. I was reading this headline here. He cut. Malai cut nine government offices on the first day, according to Breitbart, dramatically rearranging the federal executive branch, reducing the number of cabinet level ministries from eighteen to nine. Except if you look at this This is not really This is not really like getting rid of the Department of

Energy or the Department of Education or something like that. What he's doing is all of these functions are going to continue. What he's doing is he's getting rid of some of the upper level management, but he's taking the basic functions and all the rest of stuff and putting them under another ministry and some other ones that were not elevated to cabinet level. He is elevating to cabinet level. He put the General Ministry into the hands of his sister m in his

sister's hands. That required getting around the law that prohibits that kind of nepotism pointing family members to top positions. How did he get around that law so quickly? Well, he signed an executive order. This is not looking too good at first. Oh, he got rid of nine agencies, and yet

it's just window dressing because the functions remain. That's like saying, well, I'm going to get rid of the Department of Education, but we're going to take all that and we're going to put it under the Health and Human Services, right HHS. It's just musical chairs. And then it's nepotism and its executive orders. So rather than it looking like he is keeping his promises, which is what the mainstream alternative press is saying, I think exactly the opposite

is true. As a matter of fact, Blue Apples wrote on Twitter said, understand these people are politicians. Trusting any politician of any persuasion weaves a doomed destiny into the tapestry of a nation's fate. The most recent poster boy of the hopelessly naive, if not outright false belief that a populist hero will emerge from the corruption of the establishment to dismantle it. The most recent poster child of that is a newly elected Argentine president exhibiting charisma. Malaia was able

to rampantly ascend from humble political origins. He echoes the tenor of Donald Trump from twenty and sixteen. And if you remember in twenty sixteen, what was Trump saying he was going to be the outsider. He's going to be the guy with no political experiences like Javier Malai. He's going to shake up this corrupt cronyism and everything. What is the first thing that Malai does. He appoints his sister and he has to overthrow the law with an executive order to

do it. Trump is going to shake up the whole system. As Zach Montanaro said on Twitter, he said, if you remember, pre election, Trump was saying that he was going to prosecute Hillary Clinton. Trump after the election said, I don't want to hurt the Clintons said beautiful Hillary was a friend and he had a lot of respect for her. He didn't drain the swamp. Then he's not going to do it now. That's the reality.

That's why we're talking about Javier Malay. It's maybe easier to see it when you're not emotionally invested and somebody like people are so emotionally invested in Trump. How they've invested time, money, votes into this guy. But again, remember what he said before the election, and here's a reminder of what he said about Hillary the Clinton's twenty sixteen. Remember that that criminal. I am going to instruct my Attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your

situation, said that to her face and debate. Honestly, she should be locked up. She has to go jail. Ending this criminal government corruption is one of the most important reasons you have to go out on November eighth see that projects Donald Trump wins the presidency, we begin with her two weeks later. The President elect will not pursue any investigations into Hillary Clinton. They're good people. I don't want to hurt them. Quote. I don't want to

hurt the Clinton's I really don't. She went through a lot and suffered greatly. He doesn't wish to pursue these charges. If Donald Trump can help her heal, then perhaps that's a good thing. He needs to heal the rule of law, and he needs to figure out healing Hillary Clinton. What would be at oz with the promises to drain the swamp that President elect Trump made, promises which helped him win office. No, okay, oh forget it. That plays great before the election. No, we don't care. Right.

I was very honored, very very honored when I heard that President Bill Clinton and Secretary Hillary Clinton was coming today, and I'd like you to stand up. I had a lot of respect for those two people. We all want the same thing with all good people. We call a beautiful Hillary now because you know someone's over with Yeah, let's put together by the Rhonda Santis campaign. Bullseye. You nailed him. You showed exactly what he is about. Oh, that was before the election. This is after the election.

That's the thing about Trump is it the comedian. He's very frank, and he is the black comedian. Who is I got everybody hating maybe Dave Chappelle. Dave Chapelle, Okay, he says, you know the thing about Trump is he comes out and he tells you all those people on there they're criminals. And you're like, go, oh great, he's bowling and whistle on all these people, and he goes back in he joins them. That's exactly what he did with the selection. You understand. Yeah, they're evil people.

They got to go to jail. She's really got to go to Jelly tells her in the face to face and the debates, you I'm going to come after you. I'm going to prosecute you. And then when it's all done, they show up to his inauguration. I wonder if he paid her to be there. He said he paid Hillary Quentin to go to his daughter's wedding. People said, you've been sending her money, you've been supporting her.

They're in New York. You're a New York Democrat. You've been a New York Democrat until you reimagined yourself as a conservative Republican, a gun loving Republican and all the rest of his stuff. And of course he doesn't love guns. He's set a precedent of gun control by executive order. And but you know this, So you've always been heavily involved with the Clintons. So you attended your daughter's oh, I paid her to be the didy payer to

come to as inauguration. Like the political climate that fostered support for Trump's election

in twenty sixteen, Argentina finds itself in a similar state of upheaval. While the premise of handing the presidency often an establishment figure representing the insular political class, in Hillary Clinton was a catalyst for popular support for a fringe candidate in twenty sixteen, the backdrop that set the stage for Malaia's election was an economic climate in Argentina was more disastrous than any that's been seen in generations, nearly

one hundred and fifty percent inflation. So that was the hook for Malai. The hook for Trump was I'm an outsider, I'm against these insiders. I know Hillary, she's corrupt. Vote for me. And then after he became president, he really doubled down on the anti global so he's no longer anti Hillary right now, it's beautiful Hillary. Then after he gets elected, he pretends that he is mister anti globalism, and yet he does everything the globalist

want. Let me tell you, when he gets in a second time, he's going to want to impress the left so much that the establishment is going to write good things about him and remember him. And of course that won't happen, but he wants to believe that, the same reason he keeps giving Maggie Halberman at the New York Times exclusive access to him. I think it's the New York Times and that she writes for, not the Washington Post.

But he keeps giving her access, and Trump's supporters and the mainstream alternative media will say, stop doing that. You know that she's going to stick the knife in your back. Why do you keep giving her access? Give us access to you, right, because they're all about access, And yet he does it because it is so important to him to He thinks that he's going to get a good write up from her, and he keeps thinking it no

matter what happens. He keeps thinking she's going to come around and he's going to do that as president anyway, the Biden administration will have a lot of comfort in the fact that Malai intends to remain a part of the Paris Agreement on Climate change. And he actually sent his diplomat there on the day that he was being installed there as a president. In Argentina, he sent a diplomat, Marcia Levagi, who assured the UN at COP twenty eight climate summit

in Dubai said, Malai is a liberal. He's a libertarian. He believes in market forces and the market demands to include measures to address climate change. Now, how do you define the market? Is this what people wanting to buy? In terms of electric vehicles? Are we all saying I have to have an electric vehicle because of all this CO two out there. No, it's not coming from the people. This is all coming from This is top down. This is course, it's forced, it's blackmailed, it's a gun

to our head. This is saying what to say that this is a market demand is as cynical as saying, well, I'm not forcing anybody to get a vaccine. I'm just saying that if you don't get a vaccine, you're not going to go to school, you're not going to travel, you're not going to have a job, you're going to be kicked out of society. But I'm not forcing you to get a vaccine. And if you say that

all of this climate nonsense is market driven, that's just as cynical. The Malai administration intends to keep its commitment to reach net zero emissions by twenty to

fifty. Nothing is changing there. So nothing is changing there, nothing is changing in terms of the wars abroad and so, and he's got the full support of the IMF, because again, you could have explained that away at the beginning by saying, well, the IMF is worried about getting any money out of this basket case economy, so maybe they're looking for somebody who's going to have radical economic change. But it seems like all the globist organizations are

aligning behind him, and he's aligning with them. Well, Argentina is poised to undergo a seismic shift in its domestic policy. The tenets of Malai's early foreign policy framework demonstrate a contradiction to his previous steadfast rejection of globalism. And so if we're going to look at Haavier Malai and we're going to say, well, is he just saying that to get elected, just like Trump said things to get elected? And are we going to judge him by his policies

and what he does or by what he said as a candidate. Are we going to judge Trump by his policies of what he's already done in four years? Are we going to judge him by his campaign promises? You know, when he ran in twenty sixteen, nobody knew what he's going to do. He'd never held political office before. We had a lot of indications that he was a New York Democrat allied with Hillary Clinton. It's just a phony Hegellian

operation. All of these elections are so as the earliest of developments in his newly inaugurated presidency are counter intuitively playing to the global establishment. Do you think he's he's playing forty chess? Is that really what's going on here? Yeah, as Alex would always say about Trump, well, Joe Biden's got to solve an electoral math problem in order to get elected, says CNN. Do you think that Joe Biden can do math? Still? I think he knows

that two plus two equals five. I think he knows how to force things on people. But again, this is CNN saying that. As I said earlier in the program, these people have already elected Trump in their minds and in their media. You know, he won the primary, the Republican primary, a long time ago. According to these people, even though we're still a month or so away from the first primaries in Iowa. They say, well, look at this, We've got polls that say that Trump is at

fifty one percent in Iowa. You see, they've always used polls to influence people. They call them push polls. You can push this kind of stuff out there, and people say, well, I don't know. You know, they keep saying that Nikki Haley's got all this momentum. I really never thought, but maybe I'm missing something. If everybody else thinks that Nicki Haley is great, maybe Nikki Haley is great. And not only that, but I want to back the winning person. You know, it's like backing the

winning horse or the winning team. Somewhere. I want to be on the winning side. I don't want to get behind this guy who looks They tell me he's losing. How do they know he's losing? Do you trust any of these poles. These are the same people who consistently miss in the polling when it comes to election. And again, maybe the polls are right, maybe the elections are wrong, or if the elections are honest, maybe their

polls are completely wrong. And maybe what we ought to do is maybe we ought to use the same standard of measurement that the State Department does when they say, if you want to know if a foreign election is rigged, you look at the exit polls, and if they vary more than five percent from the reported results, somebody's manipulating something here. That's what our State department does

in foreign elections. But we don't do that here. We have exit pollings, and they'll tell you everything about every issue and about every demographic group. It is like, look, you know, the left handed white men all voted for this particular candidate. They'll tell you all that kind of stuff in great detail, but they will never tell you the exit polls and such and such an area or in such in such a state, the exit polls chose

overall, they picked Trump or Widen or whatever. But they'll never tell you that because they don't want you looking at the exit polls versus the reported votes. So don't get vested in these elections, but do understand how they're going to come after you and how this is going to play out. Georgia plus Michigan plus one more equals a Trump and this is CNN, and of course

the Conservatives after Trump wins. If he does win, the Conservatives will just stand by and let him run the table for Davos, just like Alex and company did and saying it was forty chess in twenty twenty. These people, I tell you know, as I said yesterday, Davidhyke said, calls him the mams, the mainstream alternative media. He said, that's what's behind all this pageantry with Musk and with Tucker Crawl, with Alex Jones. They're establishing

a mainstream alternative media. This is the Hegelian operation, right, So we're growing up an opposition media to CNN, New York Times and Washington Posts and stuff. They're gonna, you know, the left right Hegelian dialectic that they're setting up here, and the mainstream alternative media will go so far but no further, and they will not criticize Trump. Why well, because it's not good business for them, first of all, but because it also is in

a sense. He didn't call it mockingbird press, but I think a better term for it, the mainstream alternative media, even though I liked as a group. You can call them the mammys. They're like house slaves, but you know it's I think a better term for them than m a m I think is the neo mockingbirds because really being run by the CIA. And maybe

instead of mocking bird, you call it magabirds. That's Operation Magabird. That's maybe too many hops in terms of deriven derivation there for people to get it. But Jack Smith is going to be using Trump's phone data at a trial. Is this going to be the Perry Mason moment? He says, I didn't do this. I didn't do that. Well, I happen to have your phone information here as it happened with Alex, but I gave you all the information. No, you didn't. Here's some of the stuff we requested

that we found on your phone because your lawyer sent it to us. So they're now asking as well the Supreme Court to decide before they get into this trial whether or not the president is immune from prosecution. They wanted it, they asked yesterday Jack Smith asked the Supreme Court to quickly rule on Trump's claim that he is immune from prosecution because this is something that happened while he was president. And the Supreme Court said they will expedite consideration of this request,

and Trump's team has gotten until December twentieth to respond. I mean, we're talking about only ten days or so. The judge Chutkins got the case said that she rejects the idea that Trump's lawyers have claimed that he has absolute immunity because it was based on actions that he took while he was in office. This case presents a fundamental question at the heart of our democracy, whether a former president is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office.

That's their statement that they want answered. And it's also going to be an issue because if this trial gets put off until after the twenty twenty four election, and if Trump were to win again, then he'll simply have all this stuff dismissed. And that is based on what they're looking at. When you look at the people who really were exploited, ripped off, and now sent to jail, you know, many of them very angry. You know,

he saw the clip of Roger Stone. He had the documentary group following him around and he just could not contain his anger as he was speaking on the phone and talking about what he would do to Trump if Trump would win again. But now, you know, big sycophant for Trump, why, well, because uh, Trump is his hope. You know, he's got a

and same thing with the Proud Boys. You know, very few people who got thrown under the bus and ripped off, jailed and all the rest of very few of those people actually come out critical of Trump because he's now their ticket out of jail. They're only ticket out of jail, a Trump presidency where they hope that he's going to show some loyalty to his people. Well keep hoping, quite frankly. And then there's this back and forth about the uh you know, the left is saying he's going he's going to be a

dictator. And so then he gets on with Sean Hannity and Sean Handy says, a you're going to be a dictator, and he says, well, I'll do it for a day. That's all I need to do it for. And so then now the left picks that up and now everybody's doing this thing back and forth as a dictator for a day, you realize he was a dictator from March until November when the election was and then on the medical martial law. That's why I posed Trump so strongly. That's why I got

fired, because I pose that he was a dictator that entire time. What are you talking about? He turned over our government to a bunch of bureaucrats medical martial law. What's the point of even having an election when these people who are given the power to run rough Shotovers, given the money to run rough shotovers. If we don't have if we're going to have rules without representation, regulation without representation, things under color of law without any representation, what's

the point of having an election None, He's already been dictator. What's all this back and forth about? Why is the left giving him a free pass on all this stuff? And why is more importantly, why are the conservatives? And that's the thing that really concerns me about a second Trump term and

why I've been opposing this for the longest time. I remember, right after this stuff ended, after January the sixth, and even you know, after after Biden is installed and all the rest of stuff, people angry at me because I was criticizing Trump. Is like, shut up, he's not president anymore, leave him alone. You've got derangements syndrome. I said, No, he's not done yet. He's going to run again, and his second term is going to be much worse. Chris Christie says the second term of

the Trump administration is likely to be staffed by quote deranged sycophants. Well, first of all, I'd have to say there's not any presidential staffs that are not of any president any party. They're all staffed by sycophants in the first place. But it isn't the staff that really control anything. It's the people who, you know, the president reports to. The true deep state certainly, you know, you could say that the arrangement that is there, that

is also a part of it, that is a permanent fixture. But I think it'll be especially true as Trump is coming in. But the key is not the people underneath him. The key is the people over him. And the fact that he was doing the same thing that every politician in every nation was doing throughout twenty twenty, which is marching in lockstep behind the World Economic Forum by the rest of these people and I'm telling you that it gets in

the second time. He's going to march in lockstep with a climate mcguffin, and there may be a you know, some kind of a pandemic mcguffin there as well. We'll be right back looking for better information. Apsradionews dot com features articles and commentary, along with audio from all the top news from around the world. Apsradionews dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, let's understand what the DNA or where the idea is coming in.

And of course the DNA is they're looking at this as the ultimate globalist idea. Wouldn't that be interesting? Instead of having to have something inserted under your skin as they have talked about doing, what if it's your DNA the ultimate global id And this is coming from Biometric Update picked up by Technocracy News. Your DNA is beyond unique for every person, revealing all your genetic predispositions, all of your family connections. It cannot be altered and endures a lifelong immutability.

And so you can understand why these people are excited about it. You know, it's interesting because John Lennox, who is an Irish mathematician. I enjoyed listening to him. He debates he's a Christian apologist, which he's not apologizing for being Christian. He is explaining to people, debating people. He's debated Richard Dawkins and many other atheists, and he's a really brilliant person.

And of course when he talks about he talks about it as being a code, right, and he says, if you stop and think about it, if you make this a word, he says, it's really the longest word, and he says, the very beginning we are told, and the beginning was the word logos, and it is not just a word, but it is something that also embodies a purpose, a plan, all the rest of

this. And since you know, DNA is reflective of that defining logos, that defining intelligence, and Krick and Watson understood that when they discovered it, said, well, we can't have come here by accident. Has to be planned. But of course we know there can't be the God of the Bible. So we're going to say that space alien did this, and we'll call it penn spermia. But biometric identification solutions are going to be an angle that

they're going to play in this. I think for citizens, proof of their own identity is going to be the key to state benefit. It's to education, to mobility, just as we saw with the rollout. But of course, if you're illegal somebody that they want to have here, they will not ask you for ID. You'll be able to do anything that you wish without

those restrictions. And so this is something that again you could say that it is immutable, But the question is if they're going to give us DNA vaccines and if they're going to give us mRNA, they're going to modify things like that, is it really immutable. Are these two different things going to work

against each other? That's the question. And so as they say, unlike fingerprints or iron skins or facial shapes which change over time, the DNA does not change, but it can be modified and that's what they're working on.

So as we continue to look at it, the key thing to understand is that DNA identification is far more precise and other metric methods, and they're always looking at a way to mark us, to corral us, to track us, which truly is amazing when you think about their obsession with all of this carbon travel for example, soon you will be restricted by your personal carbon allowances.

I estimate that your standard of living is going to be reduced by over eighty five percent, ninety percent if you're on a if you want meat or dairy, They're going to shut all of this stuff down. This will all be their methods of control. Before we run out of time here on Rock Fan, SERGEI thank you very much for the tip, he says David. I got to say, always refreshing to hear your analysis. You're as rule as it gets. Well, thank you. Tired of all my friends showing

for Trump, and Alyx me too. As a matter of fact, I said something of the comment that I made on Twitter the other day, and some person responds, I said, you know, I worked for him for ten years. And I got to say, and first comment there was sources. What are you talk about sources? I'm telling you what I saw there. Believe me or don't believe me. I am the source as I saw it. I mean, all of you lived through all this stuff as well.

You experienced firsthand what Trump did twenty twenty. Why are people supporting this is the amazing thing to me? As I pointed out, people, who are you know even their handle on Twitter is no vaccines, and yet they shill for Trump. It wasn't Trump, it wasn't his fault. He was responsible for everything that happened. And if he was bamboozled, why do you think it isn't going to happen again. I don't think he was bamboozled. I don't you know. That's the interesting thing. I don't think that Trump

is stupid. The Trump supporters think he's stupid, because the Trump supporters are stupid. If they haven't caught onto this trick yet, they are beyond hope. Quite frankly, on rock Fan, thank you for the tip. Okay, you got me with a special take on the Nutcracker suite heading to get mine. Well, thank you very much. That is really nice to hear that. I appreciate that. And again that's the album. You can find it on band camp and under David Knight Project, but you can also find

it at the Davidnightshow dot com. Again, it is a digital download. Is the delivery that we have there. But as we're about to run out of time, I just want to say that, just tell everybody that I really do appreciate all the support that you've given us. By the way, we still have some Black Friday sales on T shirts on tumblers, and I've

got that clip here somewhere where i can show it to you. The T shirts that we have are available sixteen ninety nine Black Friday sale as well as the tumblers, and that is a double wall tumblrkoozy Tumblr simple mechanism on the lid, so it's very easy to clean. I like those tumbler a great deal, so those are all still available. We do have the shirts that are going out and we're actually gonna make available a design with the album cover

on it. This is what the T shirt design is going to look like, just in case you need to have some more crazy Christmas T shirts or sweaters. Of course it's not a sweater, but it will be a black T shirt that we'll put that design on. But I do appreciate the support that we've gotten from everybody. I haven't gone through in total things up. I've been busy with everything that's happening, but I'll get you a total tomorrow. We'll update the gas gauge and just to let you know where we are.

So I appreciate all of the support. And again check out the album at Thedavidnightshow dot com and we'll talk to you tomorrow. Thank you very much. Looking for better information? Apsradionews dot com features articles and commentary along with audio from all the topnews from around the world. Apsradionews dot com. Let me tell you the David Night Show you can listen to with your ears.

You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else. You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com. That's a website.