You're listening to Comedy Central.
From the most trusted journalists at Comedy Central is.
America's only sorts for news.
This is the daily shot with your.
Home Shong storm.
Alright, I drop eg sharp Hello, where a show?
Miname is down? Short?
What a factulous program have for the night?
Now listen.
It's been rough for me. Now that my Knicks and my Rangers are out of the playoffs, I'm ready to focus on the world. There was a lot going on today. Doctor Anthony Fauci testified.
In front of Congress today and ironically contracted rabies there terrible, but his testimony was obviously about whether or not the pandemic was caused by a lab leak.
I just will never know.
Don't say it's to it.
Also, bb netting Yahoo has been invited next week to come to lie to Congress.
I'm sorry, address a dress time?
What did I say?
Come to address Congress through the art of lyne.
And Mexico has just elected its first female and its first Jewish president, so I'm very much looking forward to NPR's coverage of it because they are always they are always very careful to pronounce names authentically, so I'm sure it'll be like turning me out of the newly elected Mexican President Claudia.
Shangel with the show, with the show.
But of course, the biggest story continues to be the reaction to former President Trump's trial convictions. For the left, the conviction was an exercise in concealed and controlled glee. Many took the opportunity to over demonstrate.
How they took no pleasure.
From this day that they had been dreaming about since childhood.
It was a somber and sad day for America that we have now seen a former president convicted on three four fellow accounts.
I would hope we could all agree that this is a sad moment.
The justice system had an honorable day, our country had.
A sad day, and Faris Beulah had the day off.
Perhaps nothing personified the delicate high wire between glee and gravitas more than President Biden's schesher cat press conference.
Encore, mister president, can you tell us, sir Donald Trump prefers himself as a political prisoner and blames you directly?
What's your response?
No, don't stop, don't go, don't stop.
Why can't they tell him just.
Fucking keep walking whenever he's out in public and.
He stops.
No blaino, okay, go sir? Do you think the condition will have an impact on the campaign. We'd love to hear your thoughts, sir.
Why does everything have to be so far weird? Why if you have something to say about it, say it. If you don't have something to say about it, don't say.
But you're just.
Gonna stop and hit him with some kind of seventies sitcom freeze frame. Mister president, what do you think of the conviction?
Why so?
For Democrats have worth?
The challenge is how do we exploit the moment politically? Put out giving the impression that this was the plan, all of law Republicans needed to employ a slightly different strategy.
So this was a sham ragged political show trial from the very beginning.
This is the most outrageous travesty I've ever seen.
This was not law, This was not criminal justice.
This was politics.
This was a political smear job.
I guess we all need to shop at Banana Republic from now.
On, because that's what it feels like. Yeah, a Banana Republic.
After this trial, we need to shop at Old Navy because our country is a sinking ship.
It was a sham.
A sham. This trial a sham.
I say it was a sham.
I'm shopping.
I don't name.
The trial was a sham.
Yes, impaneled grand juries and submitted evidence and cross examined witnesses.
But how is.
Donald Trump or his family not allowed on the jury? Outrageous? I guess in America now we need to start shopping at Banobo's because our country is getting at both ends. You see, if I may, Bonobos are highly sexual apes frequently engage in activities with multiple partners. Oh, I'm going to be a big hit on primadologist Dick Dock. But maybe our justice system wasn't a sham, but certainly applying our justice system to Donald Trump was.
This is the weaponization of the justice system against their political opponent.
This is a justice system that hunts Republicans while protecting Democrats.
Oh my god, the justice system hunts Republicans while protecting Democrats. Someone should mention that to such unprotected Democrats as Senator Robert Menendez and Congressman Henry Quay are both facing corruption charges brought by our Department of Justice. Not to mention, Hunter Biden was facing Jerry's selection in a federal gun chargers trial today. That's probably what you notice everyone on Fox and Friends this morning using pillows to cover their
boners it. But now you've done it, Liberals, through your sham organization, the good arted and good.
Intention denizens of Magatania have finally been pushed too far.
Be ready because on January twenty of next year, when he's former president Joe Biden, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
And Daily Wires Matt Walsh said Trump should quote make and publish a list of ten high ranking Democrat.
Criminals who he will have arrested when he takes office.
These Democrats will rule the day they decided to use law fair to stop a presidential candidate. It won't be Hunter Biden the next time. It's going to be Joe Biden. It could potentially still be Barack Obama. It could still potentially be Hillary Clinton.
It could be Barack Obama.
First of all, why is she broadcasting in front of Georgia o'keef's vagina? And second, perhaps it is time for those on the right to begin to examine what it might be like to investigate Hillary and William Clinton, or perhaps to do it continuously and relentlessly for the last
thirty years. But to admit their own political gamesmanship, their own attempts at weaponizing justice, their own relentless pursuit of opponents, their own dehumanizing rhetoric towards the left, would be to allow a molecule of reality into the air tight distortion field that has been created to protect Macedonians from the harsh glare of actuality. It is a place where a moment such as this next one can pass without so much as a gasp of what planet do you live on?
For it is clearly not ours.
You famously said regarding Hillary Clinton, locker up. You declined to do that as president.
I didn't say locker up, but the people don't say locker up, locker up?
What the fuck.
You never said locker I think I remember you saying it to her face.
At a debate.
It's just awfully good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in our country, because you'd be in jail.
To be fair, I apologize. You did not say the words lock her up. You only used a phrase synonymous with locking her up. Again, apologies, you didn't say lock her up. You merely gave the thumbs up to thousands of others chanting lock her up. But that doesn't mean he literally said lock her up. Although to be fair, he literally said lock.
Her up all the time.
So cooking Hillary anyway, crook it that you should lock her up.
I'll tell you. For what she's done, they should lock her up.
Her up is right, lock up the vibes, lock up Hillary.
And we sallion time and then the.
And the Fox and Friends b team is just sitting there, tanned.
And fit, healthy and so lockable.
How did they get seld He's good looking bunch.
But there's three of them. One of them didn't remember he said lock them up. I can believe two of them didn't remember. Three of them.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, I present to you is why we need courts.
Whatever flaws the American.
Justice system has, and they are legion, especially for non billionaire former presidents, it does appear to be the last place in America where you can't just say whatever the fact you want, regardless of reality.
Trump knows this better than anyone. Now.
I would have testified. I wanted to testify.
The theory is you never testify because as soon as you testify anybody. If it were George Washington, don't testify because they'll get you in something that you said slightly wrong and then they sue you for perjury. You would have said something out of whack, like it was a beautiful sunny day and it was actually raining out.
Yes, our jails in America are filled with incompetent weathermen. I'm telling your officer, I thought there would be thundersnow instead of chance.
Don't take me away.
This is why the law and order right hates court procedures when apply to them. Courts are the last remaining guardrail that is a standard of evidentiary presentation. It is the last place where you have to prove what you say. And you see the difference in what they say out of court versus what they say in court. Here is Trump on the twenty twenty election. Out of court, this.
Is a fraud on the American public. We know there was massive fraud.
It was a rigged election.
Here are his lawyers in court. This is not a fraud case. We are not pledging fraud in this lawsuit.
We're not alleging that anyone's stealing the election.
Here is Rudy Giuliani pleading before the court of seasonal Landscapers.
What happened there?
It's a mix up.
He's pleading, but not in the actual court.
It's a fraud, an absolute fraud.
And what does Juliani say about that in court?
If we had it led fraud? Yes, but this is is not a fraud case.
It's not a fraud case in court where I would need evidence. It's only a fraud case out there amongst the sod and the mulch, where I can say whatever I want. Fox News says that dominion voting machines rigged the election for Biden.
Out of court.
They were flipping votes in the computer system or adding votes that did not exist. The whole situation was carefully calculated and created to steal the election from President Trump.
Did you notice as the fraud trial went on, Sydney Powell turned into Michael Jackson.
Is that it ended that segment with.
But that's where you.
Can say out of court, But in court, Fox was forced to pay seven hundred and eighty seven million dollars for false statements. The difference between in court and out of court is that in court someone can say, prove it, and the problem is that most of the time in this country, our political leaders are not in court. They are here on TV, where the news media has decided that there's really no such thing as reality.
We now live in two utterly different universes.
These two Americas are living in two different realities. We're living in two different realities.
Americans are living in two for the most part, two very different realities right now.
No, you're thinking of the multiverse.
We are all living in one reality, and it can be the news media's job to litigate the parameters of said reality. What the courts do really well is look backwards and reconstruct the realities of what happened.
The news media could do the same, but.
What they do instead is look forward and wildly speculate on the future.
If Donald Trump is the nominee, and if he is convicted of a crime, could you support him?
If he's a convicted felon, If he is the Republican nominee, does that mean you're still going to vote for him?
He could be convicted before November.
Would you still support him?
Then?
Will you commit to certifying the twenty twenty four election results no matter who wins?
Let me look forward?
Will you accept the election results of twenty twenty four, No matter what happened, Senator.
No matter what Senator, voting regularities and overlords, voting machines that suddenly transform into fighting robots, voting booth powers activate, will you still certify?
Who thing cares?
No one knows what the future holds. Ask this person what it.
Was about the twenty twenty election that they found objectionable, and then litigate the realities of their objections to them in front of them. So when they say to you, I never said locker up, you can say I object they do that?
What is wrong with you? What is wrong with you?
And you know what I gotta Here's the deal.
You really want to ask speculative questions that nobody can answer, We'll just create a show just for that.
We'll tike it down to a half hour and call.
It No One Knows, And you can put all the.
Polls and the horse race questions in there, and then with the other twenty three and a half hours in the day, there's seventies a week. You can present the evidence for our shared experience. Because court should be the option of last resort for our defined reality, not the only option for our defined reality.
So listen up, media, We'll give you a little gavel.
You can study all the evidence, no matter how tedious, and reach a conclusion, and then you can present those conclusions and the audience us. We'll be the ones doing like jury duty willingly without penalty of law, or without trying to come up with any excuse to avoid having to do jury duty.
I think I'm seeing the flaw in my argument. Either way, it's better than what we have now.
When we come back, ken Buck.
Will be joining us. Don't go away.
Where about the programs?
I guess tonight A Republican who used to represent Colorado's fourth district in Congress for nine years until his resignation in March, please weapon in the program, former Congressman ken Buck?
How are you now?
For those in the units that might not know so, sir, you are a congressman for nine years, conservative bona fides, I mean, impeccable, and yet not strong enough in fealty to the Trump world that you were immune from the pressure and the penalties that they might place on you.
Well, Donald Trump's not a conservative.
Exactly, but now you're the rhino you with and you and I probably disagree on most things.
Hopefully everything.
Well done, sir, well done.
But what is the pressure, like, you know, I see so many Republican stalwarts who are on the record as saying, this man is a con man, this man is not worthy of the highest office of the presidency, this man defiles our great country. I'm supporting him in twenty twenty four. What is the mental process of that?
Well, it's really pretty simple. In order to get elected, you've got to get fifty one percent of the vote, and so there's this combination of wanting to do the right thing. So you run for office, and then you need to be popular in order to win. And the Republican Party now a majority of Republican primary voters are MAGA supporters, and so you don't want to make the man mad. Who is really in control or strongly influencing the MAGA voters. So those folks are making a calculation.
They want to stay in office.
What is there in your mind? What's the percentage of that?
How much of it is cynical calculation and how much of it is people like yourself leave and they are filled in by real ideologues who believe in that message. The message of it's really whatever Trump wants having nothing to do with conservative principle.
I think that there's one hundred percent of the folks who are running for office who recognize that if they're going to win a Republican primary, they need to be Trump supporters.
Right, And that's what's happening.
Was there discussion behind the scenes in Congress where people would say, I want this to end?
Do they feel hostage to that?
In both parties? Honestly, in both parties there is a real problem with the folks who are at the head of the ticket. Obviously Dean Phillips felt that way on the left.
Sure, no, I was a big Phillips supporter. I really thought he was going to go all the way. Remind me again, who is Dean Phillips now? But you've said so you've watched this process play out with Donald Trump. It would you say it's fair that it literally drove you from Congress.
I would not win a primary in the next election, or if I want a primary, it would be because there were so many people who wanted to run against me that they split.
And what was the crime that you committed?
Because your positions hadn't changed, So tell me the crime you committed.
So I don't know that it's a crime. Now that we're talking about verdicts and things like that, let's just trying to stay away from whatever crime.
You are not under.
Oath in anyway, whatever crime I committed, the statute of limitations probably hasn't run, so I want to make sure I'm clear there. But my goal in leaving Congress was to leave undefeated and unindicted, and I have accomplished that goal. So I'm very happy about.
You gotta aim higher next time, you gotta.
You do have a frustration and complaints about the process of this Donald Trump trial. I think you called it shameful president. No, shameful president, is that correct? A shameful precedent.
I think it is a bad president. And I was a prosecutor for twenty five years.
Why do you think it's a bad president.
It is a bad precedent because lady Justice, blindfold, scale sword, the image of Lady Justice.
We went out in the seventies. I'm very familiar.
In this case. The blindfold came off, the blindfold is on because people shouldn't be targeted and the system is flawed. I'm not saying that it doesn't happen. People shouldn't be targeted because they're white or black, man or woman, Republican Democrat, Rich Poor. The blindfold came off and Donald Trump was targeted.
Now how was he? I'm curious how he was targeted?
So Cyrus Vance was the previous DA declined this case. Alvin Bragg brought a case where the misdemeanor had the statueations had expired, found a felony to extend that statue limitations, and then brought the case.
I found a felony or there was a felony.
Well, there wasn't a felony for the previous district attorney.
I mean many times district attorneys will say I don't think the evidence gets to that standard. But another district attorney might come in and say, oh, no, that's a felony. He's doing that in order to manipulate an election.
That's a felony.
So this district attorney declined the case. Alvin Bragg declined the case and then brought the case. And there was significant political pressure to bring the case. And that's something that our justice system needs to be insulated from. And the federal system has done a fairly good job of being insulated. You've got Hunter Biden, You've got special council appointed.
On But Hunter Biden wouldn't be up against charges if he wasn't Hunter Biden, he'd be just some dude who brought a gun somewhere. He wouldn't be facing the charges he's facing.
Well, we probably disagree about that. I think that hopefully Hunter Biden.
We think Hunter Biden would be facing rather than like a rehab stint or something along those lines. You think the attention on Hunter Biden would be occurring whether his name was Hunter Biden or not.
I prosecuted hundreds of gun cases, some of them because drug dealers, drug users, drug addicts had purchased a gun.
Yes, but doesn't that say more about this country's view on drug cases and how we prosecute them, and how we excuse white collar crime. We basically have a bargain with white collar crime where we say, how about if you give us like five percent of it and everything.
I'll be following?
Like, isn't isn't that not speak to political targeting? But the way that we diminish white collar crimes? I mean, two thousand and eight, the financial system collapsed and one dude went to jail for like three months.
I mean, I think Martha Stewart did a longer stint.
Which was a white collar crime, by the way, But yeah, I think that I was a white collar prosecutor for much of my twenty five years. Absolutely, a black kid walks into a bank, robs a bank. Twenty years a white guy at a bank, steals millions of dollars compared to twelve hundred dollars, gets off with probation or goes to a camp in Florida for a few months. Absolutely inequitable. Absolutely in Congress, and so couldn't you look.
At this as actually not a shameful president, but an unbelievably positive step in sending a message that the low level of corruption that seems to be the center of our political life is unacceptable.
I mean, none of you the way I want to look at it. But I was not a possible POSI.
I didn't think that was common apologies.
No, no, you all get bonuses.
Ye, yes, exactly.
So it is a dangerous precedent in my mind because when we start charging former presidents and I'm not saying that. Look, you think what Donald Trump did in the Land City with the casinos and other things right there, was fraud, and it maybe went beyond civil fraud. And there are plenty of things that people could look at and say that that's a criminal case. I think when you look at a former president and he has gone up how many civil cases now and for criminal cases.
But let's be clear.
I mean Donald Trump didn't come into office and boy scout, he was probably one of the most sued individuals in New York State history.
I mean his first lawyer was Roy Cone.
You don't hire Roy Cone and say to him like, and I want to make sure everything's done on the up and up. Like Roy Cone, I think, was Donald Trump's lawyer and Satan's lawyer. I think, and if I remember correctly, even Satan would say to him, like take it down or not, Troy, that's.
A little bit, but pay his bills.
He did not pay his bills.
But my point is this is a continuation of a process.
So the targeting aspect of it. Look, a healthy.
Country would have viewed what Donald Trump did from the election day through January sixth, the way that he meticulously and relentlessly pursued all avenues to overturn a democratic election. That's what a healthy country would deal with but a healthy country also looks at other aspects of what seemed to be fraud. If you have a home office and you put it on your taxes, but you don't really have a home office, that's a problem.
For you, is it not?
Yes?
Why isn't?
Why aren't they say like it's just a bookkeeping era of one hundred and thirty thousand dollars. Donald Trump colluded with his lawyer and a publisher of a major tabloid to buy and bury stories not a crime that he would deem hurtful to his election, and then use the finances that he paid for those stories and put them down as not that that is a crime.
Is it not.
He didn't put him down. He put him down in a ledger as not a payment for it. But so would what would he? Well, you can falsify your own books. You just can't false by your books. When you submit him to the I R s oh.
So, when he had sitted him, he said, this is so.
He said it was a legal expense. It wasn't a campaign expense.
I understand the point you're making. So here's where this takes us. I think I don't believe Donald Trump is the sole threat to our democracy.
I truly don't.
I think he is a symptom of a dissatisfaction that people have with the democratic system where if you have money and you're powerful, you can go. It was on my ledger. Is a legal expense.
It's not a real it's not a legal expense. It's not for my election.
It's I think they see that his prescription of our system is correct. The system is rigged, and people's dissatisfaction with that is what leads to Donald Trump being able to command that dissatisfaction. Where I would disagree with him is I don't think he wants to drain the swamp. I think he wants the deed to the swamp signed over to him so that he can turn America into just another subsidiary of the Trump organization.
But I don't know.
My question to you would be, why is it bad precedent to pursue that case legally?
Donald Trump?
If he pursued the election fraud cases through the courts and they impaddled a grand jury and then it went to a trial with a jury of peers and they decided on it, that's not illegitimate, And so why is this illegitimate? And by the way, that's my lawyer calling right now.
With First of all, is that really your ring tone?
Like?
Is your ring tone?
Baby? Go nappy? All right?
Sorry, getting back to our democracy.
Look, I just find all this high dudgeon really disingenuous.
The prosecutor ran on getting Donald Trump, Well he's the DA.
He runs on weeding out corruption.
Right, Can I answer that?
Please?
I was a prosecutor ran five years, but I read three separate times. Okay, I ran on, we've got a combat violent crime. We've got to go after repeat offenders. Never ran on I'm going to get that guy.
But you could run on I'm getting white collar coruption. Alvin Bragg didn't say I'm going to get Trump. What he said was, I'm the most qualified. This guy has a record in New York decades long of corruption, and it's I think it's Look, if you were Dick Tracy and you wanted to be the thing, wouldn't you be like, I'm gonna get Scarfazer whoever one of the Dick Tracy
guys like this was a guy pulling that. And the second point to that would be this in twenty sixteen, what was one of the platforms that Donald Trump ran on, let's get crooked Hillary.
Thank god he's not a prosecutor.
I understand, but do you get my point?
The point is this guy ran on, Hillary is crooked and I'm gonna put her in jail. And then with Biden, he said the Biden crime faily is crooked and I'm going to put them in jail. And then a prosecutor in New York said, I have evidence you've committed a felony, so we're gonna put you on trial.
And he's like, what, how dare you sir?
What are we talking about?
What is this?
What are we dealing with? I'm about to go to jail. Are nice?
Respectfully? Please apples and oranges? Because you've got someone in a political system, and how many people in America believe what a politician says.
Sorry, hey, tickets are free. I will throw you out of here. Respectfully. We're having a conversation.
This is not rome.
A prosecutor walks into a courtroom and tells a lie, and that prosecutor loses a law license and probably goes to prison.
Exactly.
So the difference between Alvin Bragg's saying I am going after that person and Donald Trump saying that person should go to prison is two different forums.
Who has the more power?
Who has more a candidate, no, the president and someone running for president. This is kind of a crazy argument you're making.
No, no, no, no, let me finish. Bill Barr. Great Attorney General Merrick Garland, Great Attorney General Merrick Garland appoints a special counsel and then puts the report out that says that Joe Biden should not be prosecuted because he's a kind gentleman with a bad memory, something to that effect.
That's not what he said, but okay, well it's close.
What he said was he would present to the jury as a kindle general, which means I don't think we can win this case because I think he's too sympathetic a figure.
Okay, yeah, okay, very different.
I apologize. I'm not trying to slander objection.
It's just day no objection. What's the I don't know, all right, so long a time to work.
But the point being that if a candidate says I'm going to get this person, then that's all Alvin Bragg was at that time as a candidate. So why aren't you holding Donald Trump, who's running for president to the same standard that you would hold Alvin Bragg. And not only that, when Donald Trump was president, he did impat a special prosecutor to go after the Russian collusion hoax, that John Durham panel, and that was there to try
and get charges against Hillary Cullington. You can't be mad at the Democrats for committing murder just because your team only committed attempted murder like that just doesn't fly. They were successful in their prosecution as opposed to those other cases where you just tried to get her.
So Donald Trump never had the authority to request a search warrant, put handcuffs on somebody, prosecute somebody. That is always done by an independent Department of Justice. On the other hand, Alvin Bragg ran for office to get that authority to do those very things. It's two separate.
Situations, not solely. And also those things come with a process. He can't just go in there and go arrest that guy. This isn't navalney. This is a grand jury was impaneled of normal New Yorkers, not Alvin Brack, and he presented his evidence and they came back and said, yeah, there's a case here.
So then they impaneled the jury, and then both sides got to choose.
You can indict a ham sandwich, that's what a grand jury is, okay, But generally you wouldn't convict a ham sandwich.
Because at some point twelve New Yorkers would go, that's a the hand.
Sandwich, and we will see what an appeals court does. Look, you're putting me in an unenviable position of defending Donald Trump.
I've known in a long time.
I'm putting you in a position of defending the process that he was put through. That process has standards, you set it yourself. An appeals court is going to look at this. There are many safeguards within our legal system, and he's getting the benefit of almost all of them in a way that poor New Yorkers will never get a sniff of.
Agree both.
So he's getting dooier process than anybody has ever gotten.
So I don't understand just because you.
Don't like the result. He didn't like the result of the election. Our elections are a fraud and we're a third world country. He doesn't like the result of a criminal case. Our courts are a fraud. What would make them better if they did what I wanted?
That's not our system. No, that's a monarch.
I think what would make them better in his mind if they didn't convict him. That's my point. Yeah, but I don't think he wants justice in this country. I don't think he's standing up and saying we need justice. He said, I've been saying the election's stolen. So let's see if we can elect election in Congress. I didn't win in the courts, so let's let's go to Congress. I wanted to certify those electors.
By the way, you and I, you walked out here and you said to me, this is just fifteen minutes ago.
I promised I wouldn't do this.
You said to me, I bet we don't agree on anything, and yet sir, here.
You are.
Agree daytime.
If we could do this.
So I just get repair.
I retract my previous comments.
I will have a scenargrapher note those in the how do we My point in the first segment was the courts have been a really important stop gap. I think our courts are there is a two tiered system, and poor people without access get screwed. But I do think it's played an important role in holding up certain things in terms of corruption. I think the news media has
forgotten that that can be part of their role. Is that something that you think could bring a sense more of an established reality and earned authority from the media that could create some parameters that we can all sort of agree on.
Is that something that you think would be possible.
I appreciate the question. I'm no longer a defense attorney now I could go to so I think we went from Walter Cronkite and Dan rather to entertainment, and I think the problem.
Are you looking at me? I had nothing to do with this.
I think the problem right now is everybody gets their news sources in silos and they just keep getting reinforced with certain ideas. I went to a neighbor's house the day after the twenty twenty election. Their flag was upside down.
You was next to the alitos.
That's crazy.
I knocked on the door and asked them your flags. I thought they made a mistake.
Oh gosh, but it was they were sending a message.
Oh it's a crazy mess. There were kids playing across the street, the refrigerator gas in the tank, there was what's the thought?
It was a dystopian like the last of us kind of it. Yeah, they were falling apart. I wonder too if the algorithm you know has played a role. You know, people can say like, oh, they're in their silos, but I think also the algorithms of social media incentivize you to more and more radical content. They want to keep you engaged in the same way that the news media
needs kind of fear and urgency. I always say it's built for nine eleven, but in the absence of nine to eleven, they have to make you think like it's nine to eleven. And I think the algorithm you know plays a role in that as well, driving us into those holes lacking perspective.
I don't know what you do about that, but.
Well, one you create more competition. Facebook should have five facebooks that they compete with, and hopefully there would be a point where.
What they do is they buy anything that even resembles a budding Facebook and stick it in their Facebook drawer.
That's the tough part.
Oh do you miss Congress in any way?
Is there something about do you feel it was a job left undone for you? Do you feel what are your ultimate thoughts about about leaving the way you did and and the unfulfilled potential of a government that is completely disconnected from the needs of its people, allowing demagogues like Donald Trump to rise.
Well, I left because I couldn't tell the lie twenty Corenty election wasn't stone the January sixth defendants aren't political prisoners, on and on and and so.
That's him saying that, not me. I just want to make that clear.
I don't.
If I ever decide to run for Congress as a Republican, I just want to make sure that that's ken Buck saying that, not me.
Continue.
So, not not telling the not agreeing to the party line.
Right, You're a victim of cancel culture.
Well I am, I'm one. I'm not a victim of of anything. I am absolutely blessed beyond belief, with six grandkids and plenty of six grandkids, six and a half grandkids one on the way.
Oh god, I'm sorry.
I immediately went to like salamonic wisdom of like, no, you're not supposed to do that.
No, but but you know, there's a lot of life out there besides, and it's about nothing and telling lies. And so I made a choice to go enjoy what I've got to left.
What will break this fever in Washington.
One. America does great with a crisis. Nine to twelve, America came together and we were a unified country. I hope we don't get for like seven hours. I hope we don't get to that crisis point. But I think that there is a leader out there that will unify and help unify America. And it's somebody who I believe that great more, somebody who has great leadership skills, a
John F. Kennedy. You know, I probably wouldn't have said this twenty years ago that he was a great hero, but you look at what John F. Kennedy did in terms of bringing the country together during the Cold War and moving us forward. Uh, there is somebody there that will help America heal and move forward.
You wouldn't happen to have a name, would you.
I know it's not ke Buck, and I know it's not one of the two. And Nate's leading the country in the in the polls right now.
Right Well, I very much appreciate you coming back and having the discussion with this to come back and says again much appreciate it.
Whish of that former coins gonna come back.
We're gonna take it back to do that back. That was a.
Hell.
Everybody's gotta goshout for tonight.
Before we go, we're gonna check in with your host for the rest of this week, mister Ronnie.
Chang, Rodney Chang, tell the people, what do you got lined up for this week?
Oh?
John, I'll be looking at international stories because I figure at least one of the thirty seven hosts of the show should be thinking about places besides America, Speaking of which made new presidente of Maco Mazeltov.
The chump.
Masel Talv Why why are you masl talving me? Oh?
Because you know she's you know, she's got the you know the it's the it's the hell bray, the Chosen's Jewish.
Whoa whoa? You said it on me?
Okay, that's not a slurry. You could say Jewish.
Know it's a hot ish, Okay, Joe. I'm just saying, Hey, if an Asian dude one president of Mexico, I'd be hyped.
Okay.
I throw a big party for my staff and maybe give everyone sitting next to me one hundred bucks.
I'll give you one hundred bucks. Stay tuned Ronnie Jang this week and check out.
We've got a new podcast away, Nick shot God Sure starting day.
Explore more shows from the Daily Show podcast universe by searching The Daily Show wherever you get your podcasts.
Watch The Daily Show week nights at eleven.
Ten Central on Comedy Central, and stream full episodes anytime on Paramount Plus.
This has been a Comedy Central podcast.
Dawn