Already and this this is the DAILYA.
This is the Daily OS.
Oh, now it makes sense.
Good morning and welcome to the Daily OS. It's Wednesday, the first of May.
I'm Zara, I'm sam.
This week, a hate speech trial against One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has begun in the Federal Court.
A defamation trial between Deputy Green's leader Marine Ferruki and One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has begun, with Australia's hate speech laws expected to be put to the test.
Well National leader Pauline Hanson has been accused of unleashing a torrent of public racist abuse against Green senator Marine Ferruki, including threats against her life. The case, brought by Green Senator Marine Ferruki, centers around an exchange on social media following the death of Queen Elizabeth.
It comes after Hansen was accused of racially discriminating against Green's deputy leader Marie Ferruki in a social media post from twenty twenty two. Hanson and Faruki have both faced questioning so far in the hearing, so on today's podcast, we're going to explain a bit about the context of the case and what could happen next before we get there though, sam what's making headlines.
Budget airline BONSA has entered voluntary administration. It comes after the Australian carrier announced the cancelation of all flights on Tuesday morning. Virgin and Quantas responded to the cancelations by offering free flights to impacted passengers. Bonza became the first low cost independent airline to launch in Australia in fifteen years, when its services began only in January of last year.
A notice filed to the Australian Securities and Investment Commission or ASSEK on Tuesday shows Bonza has appointed an external accounting firm to wind up its business operations.
A university in Melbourne has admitted to underpaying its casual staff by two point eight five million dollars. Swimburn University and its affiliate Swimburne College self reported the unintentional error that impacted almost two thousand employees between twenty seventeen and twenty twenty three. It comes after the union representing university staff raised concerns of underemployments in the sector in twenty
twenty two. The university has apologized and said it's working on repaying affected staff.
Solomon Island's Prime Minister, Manasse Sagovare has announced he won't return as leader after recent elections. Polling in the South Pacific nation showed no clear winner. After last week's vote, Solomon Islands signed a security agreement with China in twenty twenty two that raised concerns from the Australian government about increased tension in the Pacific region. Sagovari became Prime Minister in twenty nineteen and it's not yet clear who will take over as leader.
And today's good news, Australian researchers have made a breakthrough towards developing a long term flu vaccine that would protect recipients from multiple strains of the virus. The discovery from the University of Melbourne brings scientists a step closer to developing a replacement for the yearly flu JAB Flu vaccines are usually updated yearly to keep up with mutations of the virus. However, new research could see a universal vaccine formulated so sam this week, a hate speech trial against
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has begun in the Federal Court. Now. It all centers around comments that Hansen made on social media back in twenty twenty two, when she was accused of racially discriminating against Green's deputy leader Marine Feruki. So far we've seen both Hanson and Feruki face questioning this week.
And what was the post that actually kicked all of this off if we go right to the beginning of the case.
So in a social media post following the death of Queen Elizabeth this second, you'll remember that was in September of twenty twenty two. You were on holidays. I was slicsfully unaware.
I was away what you werewa.
Was sleeping anyway at that time Marine Ferruki, who as I said, is a Green senator. She wrote it was then on Twitter now on x saying condolences to those who mourn the queen. I cannot mourn the leader of a racist empire built on stolen lives, land and wealth of colonized peoples. She called for a treaty with First Nations, justice and reparations for British colonies. In response, Pauline Hansen
told Feruiki to quote piss off back to Pakistan. And it's that comment that Mariene Feruki is claiming was hate speech.
So Pauline Hanson fires off a tweets towards Marine Ferruki in twenty twenty two. What's happened from then to now?
Yes, So, shortly after the tweets were posted, Marine Ferruki moved to what's called censure Pauline Hanson in the Federal Senate. And essentially what a center is is a formal statement disapproval of a politician's actions or policies, doesn't have any legal consequences and doesn't really hold much weight. We've seen a number of politicians censured and never really translates outside of Parliament House.
So it's kind of like being told off.
Yeah, so Fariki urged her fellow senators to condemn Hanson's quote divisive, anti migrant and racist statement, which she had said unleashed an avalanche of hate. Instead, Labor and Coalition senators passed a general motion at the time condemning racism and discrimination in all its.
Forms, so she didn't really get the response from the Parliament that she'd hoped for.
She didn't, and so from their Marine Ferruki moved to lodge a complaint with the Australian Human Rights Commission. However, when Pauline Hanson refused to participate in an investigation. There, Marine Fruki ended up pursuing legal action instead, and that's how we get to hear So Marine Feruki is arguing in this legal action that Pauline Hansen engaged in unlawful offensive behavior and that that is a breach of Australia's
racial discrimination laws. As part of this case, Ferruki has also provided expert analysis of social media users responses to Pauline Hanson's post.
Okay, so that's what Farruki is arguing in court. What does Pauline Hanson say in response to all of this?
Pauline Hanson is denying that the tweets were made based on race. Her lawyers have made two main defenses. So the first is that the post is protected by fair comment on a matter of public interest, so arguing there that Hanson therefore had a right to make a statement
defending the monarchy right. The second point that her lawyers are arguing is that the post is protected by an implied but not an expressly stated right of political communication, meaning that both Pauline Hanson and Marine Ferruki have a right to engage in political debate.
Okay. Interesting, So Pauline Hanson. Ultimately, there isn't denying she ever said it. I mean it's there in writing what she's said.
I can't deny it. Yeah, millions of people.
Right, So what she's saying is she was allowed to say it because of those political and public interest defenses. So both sides are bringing those arguments to court this week. What have we heard in the court so far? So?
Day one started with Marine Ferruki up as a witness, and she was arguing, as expected, that Pauline Hanson's tweet was racist. She said that she felt like she had been silenced on colonization and made to feel like she didn't belong here. She said that she started experiencing racism in an overwhelming way once she entered into public life.
In response, Hanson's lawyer, Sue chrisent Thau argued, and I'll quote it here, the racism that you've experienced is far, far worse than the conduct that you complain about in relation to my client. Christentthu went on to claim that the barrage of abuse that Feriki said she had faced was actually due to her own tweet, which was described by the lawyer as provocative. Fariki rejected this premise, and she said that Hanson was a well known, longstanding and prolific sayer of racist things.
Okay, So then Marine Feriki went off the stand in Pauline Hanson then took over. What did she have to say?
Yeah, So on day two, Pauline Hansen took to the stand and over the course of the day she was essentially just played a number of clips of comments that she had made over a number of years, including in twenty seventeen when she said, and I quote here, Islam was a disease that people need to vaccinate themselves from. So Faruki's lawyers were claiming that Hansen told her to go back to where she came from because she is
a Muslim woman. Hanson rejected this premise and said that in twenty twenty two, when she published the tweet about Marine Ferruki, she didn't know that she was Muslim. So is that kind of questioning and back and forth that occurred. On the second day of the hearing, Hanson spoke of feeling incensed and insulted by Ferruki's tweet.
So this is ongoing. We'll keep everybody updated as this case progresses. But Fariki brought this case against Hanson in the beginning, what is she actually looking for here?
If she wins, she's asking for an apology from Pauline Hanson and one hundred and fifty thousand dollars in compensation to be paid towards a charity. Whether or not she gets that, we will have to wait and see.
Thanks for taking us through that, Zara. We'll bring everybody the result, perhaps in a news story when that gets passed down by the court, and who knows how long. Just a quick bit of news from the Daily Ods. We have announced that on Monday next week we are launching our first sports newsletter. It's going to be hitting your inbox at five pm every weekday. It would mean the world if you signed up. I'll throw a link in today's bio. We'll be back again tomorrow. Until then,
have a great date. My name is Lily Maddon and I'm a proud Arunda Bunjelung Cargottin woman from Gadigol Country. The Daily oz acknowledges that this podcast is recorded on the lands of the Gadighl people and pays respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island and nations. We pay our respecs to the first peoples of these countries, both past and present.
