Trump vs. Trump's DOJ

Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start? Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to. Don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin? Or what that clunking sound from your dryer is? With Thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro. You just have to hire one. You can hire top-rated pros, see price estimates, and read reviews all on the app. Download today.

Hey everyone, Ellie here, wishing you a happy Friday. So let me give you a little behind the scenes, BTS as the kids say, of what my life is like here in the media world. There are some days when you know something is happening. For example, today, we know Letitia James will be making her first appearance in federal court in Virginia on the indictment against her by DOJ.

There's other days where you're kind of waiting and think something might happen. We are almost constantly waiting for something out of the Supreme Court nowadays, including... pending decisions on Donald Trump's use of the National Guard. So you don't know when or even what day, but you have a sense could be today, if not today, probably tomorrow. And then you have your days where you think nothing is happening or you don't know of anything that's happening, in which case...

I'll speak for myself. I'm sort of nervously glancing at my phone for those notifications we all get from CNN or New York Times or whatever your outlet is. You know, they just pop up. And I'm sort of glancing at them going, oh. Is this something for me? No. Okay, no. It has to do with something non-legal. One of those notifications popped up a couple days ago, and I did a cartoon-like...

Double take. I think if it was one of those Bugs Bunny cartoons, my eyes would have popped out of my head. Remember how that used to happen? And that's the story that I'm going to be talking about in just a moment. I think you'll recognize it as soon as we get into it. In the meantime, send your thoughts, questions, or comments in. to lettersatcafe.com.

It's the case of Donald Trump versus Donald Trump's Justice Department. And I got a hunch about who might win. The story was first reported, shockingly, by the New York Times. and not the onion. Donald J. Trump, private citizen, has filed two claims through a mandatory bureaucratic process notifying the Justice Department that he might sue for damages for a litany of purported wrongs.

DOJ's investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election, the court-authorized search of Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence, the indictments brought by Jack Smith. The president has demanded the modest sum of... $230 million to make him whole again. The process at work here, as prescribed by the Federal Tort Claims Act, typically is unremarkable bureaucratic boring.

Even after a potential litigant files the required administrative notice, the Justice Department can decide either to one, pay out a settlement or to reject the claim, in which case the potential litigant can then file an actual lawsuit.

good government grinding slowly. But Trump's claim presents two intractable problems. First, we've got the most glaring conflict of interest in the history of humankind. As Trump himself observed, quote, it's awfully strange to make a decision where I'm paying myself, end quote. Indeed. He also mused aloud, quote, in other words, did you ever have one of those cases where you have to decide how much you're paying yourself in damages, end quote.

Personally, no, I have not. Trump's not quite right when he says he'll be the one to decide whether to pay himself. Rather, any decision to settle for anything over $4 million falls initially to the Deputy Attorney General. Todd Blanche, who represented Trump as a private criminal defense counsel in some of the very same matters over which Trump now threatens to sue. Essentially, Blanche could greenlight a massive award of taxpayer dollars to cover his own legal billables plus a few.

million for his own client, though Trump has promised that he will generously donate any award to, and I quote, charity or something. Alternatively, the decision could be made by the head of DOJ's civil division, Stanley Woodward, and he represented Trump's co-defendant, Walt Nauta.

in the same classified documents case. From a conflict of interest perspective, Woodward would be a mild improvement over Blanche, but he'd still present an obvious crossing of wires. Even if both Blanche and Woodward do the right thing and recuse themselves, Imagine the poor sap at DOJ who inherits the task of deciding whether to pay out on Trump's claim. You think he might be aware that the potential plaintiff is also the president of the United States? Could it occur?

to our hypothetical Justice Department staffer that is two bosses, A.G. Pambandi and then Blanche. are both ardent Trump loyalists who tolerate no dissent. Imagine if he were to look at Trump's demand and conclude, eh, this guy's got nothing, claim rejected. How quickly would this brave soul be escorted out of DOJ headquarters?

The second problem posed by Trump's potential lawsuit is that he probably would not win in the first place under ordinary circumstances. The Federal Tort Claims Act does not automatically award damages to any person who's investigated or charged by DOJ. but not convicted. Even a dismissal or an acquittal is not enough without more. Rather, a plaintiff must show some malicious or otherwise wrongful intent by the federal government. On that note, keep in mind...

The indictments against Trump didn't go away because he won on the merits. They died on the vine because he won the 2024 election. Other portions of Trump's claim appear to be barred by the law's two-year statute of limitations. For example, even if he filed his first claim in late 2023, as reported by the New York Times,

He'd still be out of luck on his allegations relating to the 2016 election interference investigation, which ended in 2019, four years before the claims were made. But in the end... The merits will matter little. It's up to the Justice Department to decide in the first instance whether and how much to pay out. And it doesn't take a soothsayer to see where that one's headed. And nobody can stop it.

from the outside either. There's no legal vehicle through which an aggrieved taxpayer or a Democratic dissenter in Congress can sue to block a settlement in this type of case, no matter how self-enriching or otherwise outrageous. When it comes to a potential settlement, Whatever Trump's DOJ says goes.

Now, there's a fair counter argument here that if Trump were any ordinary civilian, he'd have the right to file his claim and potentially sue for damages. He probably would not win, but Jack Smith certainly was no angel, notwithstanding his recent self-serving declarations of purity.

And maybe Trump could somehow clear the high legal bar set by the act. Why should he forfeit that chance because he's the president? The answer is simply because he's the president. And when you are elected to run the U.S. government, then you simply don't get to sue that same US government and have it cut you a personal check for hundreds of millions of dollars. Sorry, the president carries plenty of perks, but that's one small, if quite reasonable, drawback. The theme here...

has become all too familiar. Trump shouldn't do it, but there's nothing and nobody in place to stop him. Thanks for listening, everyone. Stay safe and stay informed. Nobody knows your customers better than your team, so give them the power to make standout content with Adobe Express.

Brand kits make following design rules a breeze, and Adobe quality templates make it easy to create pro-looking flyers, social posts, presentations, and more. You don't have to be a designer to edit campaigns, resize ads, and translate content. Anyone can in a click. See how you can turn your team into a content machine with Adobe Express, the quick and easy app to create on-brand content. Learn more at adobe.com slash express slash business.