Note from Asha 2/19: Fearless Speech: What Are You Willing to Risk to Speak Out? - podcast episode cover

Note from Asha 2/19: Fearless Speech: What Are You Willing to Risk to Speak Out?

Feb 19, 20257 min
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:

Episode description

Asha Rangappa is a Senior Lecturer at Yale University's Jackson Institute for Global Affairs. Before that, she served as a Special Agent in the New York Division of the FBI, specializing in counterintelligence investigations. She is also a legal and national security analyst at CNN and an editor of Just Security.  For a transcript of Asha’s note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Get ready for a game changer. Adobe Express is the quick and easy app that makes creating content for your business easier than ever. From engaging presentations to eye-catching animations and social posts, your teams can produce work that's on brand and on time. every time. Transform your ideas into standout content with time-saving generative AI features that are designed to be safe for commercial use. No headaches, just results. Curious to learn more? Head to adobe.com forward slash express.

Hey folks, Asha here. Here's a recording of my latest cafe note, Fearless Speech. What are you willing to risk to speak out? As always, please write to us with your thoughts and questions at letters at cafe.com. Dear listener, almost four years ago, I wrote a cafe note called Never let your skill exceed your virtue. It was about the special responsibility borne by lawyers, in particular, not to become complicit.

in efforts to undermine democracy by providing a veneer of legality for unethical, corrupt, or illegal acts. This past week, two prosecutors in the Southern District of New York Interim U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon and her colleague, Hagan Scotton, followed this maxim. by resigning after receiving an order from Acting Deputy Attorney General Emile Bove to dismiss the charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams for purely political reasons. More importantly, they did not resign quietly.

Both wrote letters explicitly calling out their reasons for refusing to be complicit in the Justice Department's actions. In so doing, they embodied the Greek ideal of the classic truth-teller, or Parisiastes. An example that should guide all of us as we consider our own responsibility as citizens during our current descent into autocracy. The term parisiastes comes from the Greek word parisia, which means fearless speech.

According to the ancient Greeks, a truth teller has five characteristics. First, duty. They believe they have an obligation to speak the truth. Second, frankness. They speak freely and directly. Third, Truthfulness. They speak all that they know. Fourth, criticism. They speak truth to those in positions of power. And finally, danger.

They tell the truth despite the consequences. In other words, they are willing to take a risk in order to reveal the truth. By the way, quick shout out to Professor Jennifer Merchica, a scholar of rhetoric and the author of Demagogue for President. the rhetorical genius of Donald Trump, who introduced me to this concept. This last characteristic, danger, is key to being a genuine truth teller.

Importantly, the risk taken by a truth-teller need not involve physical danger, though in authoritarian regimes it almost always does, as we see from murdered journalists in Russia and jailed dissidents in Hungary. It could be anything from social opprobrium to losing your job, as was almost guaranteed to happen to both Sassoon and Scotton if they hadn't resigned first. The point is that in speaking the truth, you stand to lose something you hold dear.

which means that a true truth-teller is willing to take accountability for their words and bear the consequences of them. By contrast, remember Anonymous during Trump 1.0? He turned out to be Miles Taylor, who has indeed been a truth teller since he revealed his identity after the publication of his book, but I wouldn't have classified him as one before that. In short...

Aparisiastes has what we would typically call moral courage. I've been diving into moral courage in my research into complicity, trying to understand what drives some people to become enablers. and others to speak out. I've studied the profiles of truth-tellers and whistleblowers across different contexts, including Tyler Schultz and Erica Chung from the Theranos scandal, Frances Haugen at Facebook, and of course, John Dean from Watergate.

to name a few of the more famous examples. They have several common characteristics which have helped me develop a behavioral profile of the kind of people who are willing to take risks for the truth. one that both Sassoon and Scotton fit to a tee. First, those who show moral courage are motivated by a commitment to higher principles.

Both Sassoon and Scotten invoke such principles in their letters, appealing to equity, fairness, and impartiality, and their duty to pursue justice without fear or favor, as the Justice Department requires. Morally courageous people also tend to feel less constrained by tribal loyalties or fitting in. Notably, both Sassoon and Scotton clerked for conservative judges, including Justices Scalia and Roberts, respectively.

But it's clear that to the extent this conservatism influences their political views, neither is willing to let partisan considerations shape their actions. Those who exhibit moral courage believe that they have agency and that their actions can have an impact. Both Sassoon and Scotton could have resigned without speaking out, especially knowing that their letters were unlikely to persuade their superiors at the Justice Department.

But they documented their reasons publicly because they understand that exposing Bove's actions to sunlight can shape public opinion. Finally, morally courageous people have an other-regarding rather than self-preserving orientation. Here, Sassoon and Scotton know that the rule of law is the pillar on which our other democratic values rest, and that everyone, and indeed our entire, quote, system of ordered liberty, to use Scotton's words,

is vulnerable once it's eroded. As I observed in my earlier reference note, lawyers are the first line of defense when it That's the reason underlying the famous Shakespeare quote, the first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. But they aren't the last. Authoritarians hate courageous people because courage is contagious.

And you can bet that the danger of speaking up and speaking out will only increase in the months and years ahead. Eventually, you may have to make a choice like the one Sassoon and Scotton made, and the stakes could be much higher. Before you get to that point, it's worth reflecting on whether you fit the behavioral profile of a truth teller and what you would be willing to risk and lose to be a true Parhesiastes. Stay informed, Asha.

This transcript was generated by Metacast using AI and may contain inaccuracies. Learn more about transcripts.