Yes, The Deep State is Real

coming up on The buck Sexton Show. This is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a great American Again. The buck Sexton Show begins sectimics analysts in a stunning new off ed in The New York Times, I named top Trump administration official, excoriates the president and reveals a resistance block within the Trump team trying to protect the country from the commander in chief.

It is an extraordinary piece in The New York Times that really backs up Bob Whitford's book. A column in The New York Times is extraordinary. I've never seen anything like this in modern president presidential history. This is incredibly unusual, almost unprecedented, incredibly incredibly Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. Everybody media running wild with the whole New York Times op ed yesterday as we knew they would. And here's

what's fun. Though they've made an error. They have made a mistake, a tactical oh a whoop see, because this isn't going to result in what they want, which is a new uh ferocity of anti Trumpism that could turn to a and we'll get into the whole twenty ft the m and things shortly, but that that's what they're

hoping to do. Now, it's a problem because they have now affirmed really, or rather it has been affirmed via the New York Times his own hand in a sense, or at least in your Times has given the platform to show us all what's going on. But there is

a deep state. This is real. There are people inside of the government, including those who are I would assume Republicans who view their role as undermining the President of the United States, and that somebody could be in a position of authority in the government working for the president. A senior administration official act be so lacking in self awareness as to think that the proper way to do

this is to anonymously publish it. Why anonymously? You know this this is all let's let's just take a step

back for a moon. Does anybody really think that the person who wrote this, if they attached their name to it, would not immediately be in a position to be on every TV show with a large every new show with a large audience in the country, get a book deal right away, probably sign up for a hundred thousand dollars a speech on the speaking circuit right away, and be heralded by the left as some kind of resistance hero. I don't know how anybody can think that what I'm

saying is not true. What is really the risk? Okay, Yeah, if you said there'll be some Trump there'll be some Trump supporters that say terrible things, and I'm sure there'll be some threats. And but people get threats in this business in the media all the time. It threats is

that's not new, that's not unusual. And if you're going to take this step where now you could be out and I have to wonder if the source will in fact be outed, why not do so in such a way that it could actually mean something all it has done, folks, is confirmed what we've thought all along, which is that there are people in the government who think that they can work in an undemocratic, unelected fashion to undermine the votes of over sixty million Americans, and that they would

do so while keeping their their job is cowardice. And I have to tell you a few things that come to mind about this. What is I do not believe I've seen some of the names that are out there. I do not believe this is anybody who is and oh my gosh, level person in the White House, I do not believe it. And there's already been a whole slew of people them, you know, Pompeo and uh could Low and I mean, I can't even think there's a

whole bunch. There's like a dozen or so of them that have come out and said not me, uh Coats, uh Mad is um Kelly. They're all saying it's not that, and I believe them. Okay, So so it is not those individuals, and and it's you know, it's one thing to not say anythink it's another thing to actively lie about it so that those people are off the list. I think that this is somebody who the New York

Times when pushed. This is why they might keep it secret actually because when pushed on the issue, they could say, if it did ever come out, well, yeah, this person is like involved in you know, is that the NSC or is that, I don't know, the Economic Council or something, so you know, technically a senior White House person, but

not anyone with any real power sway. And if it does turn out that this is a mid level political appointee in the New York Times and that gets out, the New York Times will have just made an utter mockery of itself, a complete mockery of itself. Um. And you know that the White House people say reporting on this as being in disarray, and what do they expect?

I mean, how would anyone else feel if they were trying to run the government and they found out that there are people that not only are subverting them, but then taking a kind of victory lap by subverting them publicly without attaching their name to it. The whole thing. It's just stinks, It absolutely stinks. Here is the senior counsel of the President, Kelly and Colmay, talking about play for sure it matters. There are op eds like that in the New York Times every day. It's just a

different byline, or I guess the non byline here. Presidents aren't judged by the noise or even the silence that's occurring at any one moment or anyone weak by the usual critics, and they says the judged by the metrics. And when I hear people on cabal news say words like historic, unprecedented, stunning, that's exactly the way we describe the economy. It's exactly why we describe the way he's chopped down all the overburdened him duplicate, duplicative and unnecessary regulations.

This is historically an historic and unprecedented economic boon time. And the Democrats would take that away. The results as evidenced in the article are irrefutable by the way, the president is doing a great job as president. But then they take this little extra step which I find particularly annoying, of saying the president should not get credit for the good things that are happening while he's the president because it's happening in spite of him. Come on, come on,

that's just that's just that's un serious. It is an unserious approach to this. As vice President Pence more initially spending the rumor, and the rumors were flying last night. I had people telling me all kinds of stuff. I have people reaching out to me, Oh it's this person, Oh it's that person. Rumors are flying all over the place. But Vice President Pence was a name that was bandied about for a short while, and he made it as clear as he could that he's got no part of

this play. Well, I think it's a disgrace. The anonymous editorial publishing the New York Times represents a new low in American journalism, and I think the New York Times should be ashamed, And I think whoever wrote this anonymous editorial should also be ashamed as well. Anyone who would write an anonymous editorial, uh snaring this president, who has provided extraordinary leadership of this country, should not be working for this administration. They ought to do the honorable thing,

and they ought to resign. Yeah, they had to resign and come forward and speak publicly. Nothing that they've said, folks, has not already really been said by somebody else, which also makes me question the veracity of the editorial in the first place. This is like a collection of the rumors that somebody has heard that. They probably think the

New York Times editorial board wanted them to write. You know, it's it's like collecting all the juicy gossip tidbits, putting them together and saying, oh, yeah, I heard all that stuff. Here you go. It also shows you that there is collusion going on, collusion among the media. They're supposed to speak truth to power. That's a laugh, that's a lie. They don't do that. But the timing of this is

not a coincidence. That the Bob Woodword book is out and excerpts of it are flying around this week, and now you have this. This was all coordinated. It was coordinated for maximum uh commercial effect for Woodward and the other news outlets involved at the Times. But it's also maximum impact against the president, just like NBC News holding

the Access Hollywood tape until right before the election. Right that this is what they do, and they expect us to forget about the obvious bias that's at work here, that there are a bunch of leftist hacks doing the work of the d n C, acting like they're doing the work of the First Amendment in the American people. We're all sick of it. I'm sick of it. I know you are too, So the timing years is clearly not a coincidence. And just one more note on the

New York Times. You know, I've actually been a New York Times subscriber for a long time. I've been reading a New York Times since back when I was in college, and I still read it, although not as thoroughly as I used to because I gotta read so many other news sources for this show every day. But I skinned New York Times pretty much every day. I mean, their editorial pages are largely garbage, but sometimes I'll find something

now that I think is interesting. Don't forget, folks, that the same New York Times that's now saying, oh you can trust us. We wouldn't overstate this source was also part of that whole media week of worship of John McCain, largely because it was a mechanism for bashing Trump. But The New York Times published a unsourced, anonymous front page hit piece on John McCain claiming he had an affair back when he was running against Barack Obama. Don't forget that.

Don't allow that to just sort of skip. A front page hit piece on John McCain claiming he had an affair as a news story with no named sources. Al Right, that's how much the New York Times respected John McCain's military service. That's how much the big journals running around last week acting like they're so patriotic really cared about John McCain. Tried to ruin the man's reputation, his family life, his marital life because they needed Barack Obama to win

so badly. Don't forget that. I don't even get me started on the lies for years about the motivation behind Gaddy Gifford shooting, which that they were just using that as a as a club to beat the n r A and and the Second Amendment with and just lies and and event eventually New York Times I said, yeah, we were wrong about that, but they lied about it

for years. So don't you know, I don't want to hear from them that we have to trust them and that they're honest and honorable and they're just journalists doing their jobs, because no, they are activists. They are activists. And then that brings me to what action that they want? What action would they like to see here? And they've made that quite clear. Um, they want to remove this president from office. I want to talk to you about what I think. Let's just say that process for some

reason did start. What would that look like, How would that affect our national political conversation? What would go on as a result of this. We'll get into that a much more eight four four to eight to five, eight four four buck Team. We've got a jam pack show a lot coming up on the Kavanaugh hearing. That will be a bit later. Uh. And then I will also talk to you later on the show about transgender desistation um, which is something that I'll have to explain to you,

but I think you'll find particularly interesting. Uh. That will be worth our time to be sure. Eight four five. You want to call in, we will be right. Oh, dessistance not desistation. Pardon me, I thought I got that We're wrong. Trans transgender dessistance. That's coming up. We'll be right back. It lays out the path for removal of the president and cases of quote inability, and that's a term that has never been defined or tested. The idea that the Amendment would ever be used is really hard

to contemplate that we're at that point. Why won't Paul Ryan and miss McConnell to day Convenea hearing on the But I would haul up political pointees from every agency and ask who talked about invoking them? And what did you see the twenty five amendment? Folks? Isn't that so quaint? We're back to that discussion all of a sudden. We've heard it before, and now we are to believe that this is just because these people have the best interests

of the nation at heart. There's nothing there's nothing political about this. It's not bitterness because of Hillary's loss. No, they really think that the cabinet and the vice president are going to just remove Trump from office based upon what exactly? What is the basis for this that somebody wrote an anonymous editorial saying that the president has some

weird impulses and he doesn't like his decision making. You know, if they were saying that the president thought that pink elephants were flying around the Oval office and he was talking to what he thought was Jar Jar Binks, but it was really just a a potted plant in the in the corner of the room, then I would say, maybe we gotta have a conversation about the twenty amendment. They're just saying that they don't like this guy, and

they don't like his policy. They think he's erratic. That's not grounds for removing the office, because of moving the president from office because he's unfit. Uh, this is supposed to be for somebody who's mentally infirm or or has a you know, has a stroke, or you know, is deeply ill or has has real mental illness. Not you know, he watches a lot of TV and and likes McDonald's cheeseburgers and doesn't give a you know what what the media says about him. That that's not what the amendment

is for. But you know, you can always turn to the ladies of the view. They give you a sense of what what Those who are not spending a whole lot of time reading think about the situation Play twelve. I think, uh, it certainly is a very subversive act. I think this person is a patriot. I think this person is certainly putting our country first. And I think this person it sounds like someone who is very thoughtful,

someone who is well versed in our country's politics. The person talks about Senator McCain, um, it sounds like a military person to me. Um having discussed this with a lot of military people that I have in my family. Um, but I also think that this person is probably saving

our country, saving our country. Just remember this, when people say, oh, you can't come out and can't tell us who he or she is because of all the backlash backlash, there would be adulation, which makes me think that there's really that this has all been a miscalculation. This will end up, mark my words, this will end up um helping Trump more than it hurts him in the long run. Because it now now I don't want to hear from anybody, Oh,

I'm sorry, there's not a deep state. There's a steady state, and give me a break, right, I don't want to hear that nonsense anymore. You know, I I caught a lot of heat. I've been saying all along that there's a early on there's a deep state. You know, I've talked to you about the Turkish Darren Devlett and the the origins of the deep state in the in the Turkish context, and you know, we've discussed is it fair, is it just a cabal or is there really something

a little bit a little bit more? And um, you know, now you have a really a deep state manifesto that's been put out there of what they're trying to do. And it's not the only one. I mean, even without this op ed, I would say, look at what's going on at the f Beyond the d o J. There is clearly a concerted effort by some very powerful senior government figures to undermine and in fact destroy the Trump administration and to use the positions of their office to

do it. And this is this is people talking about unprecedented when it's not. You know, I've been I've been hammering that this past week. But this is unprecedented, at least in my lifetime. I've never seen anything like this. People say, oh, what about the T Party or all. I'm not talking about a citizen movement in opposition to the president's policies. This is people who are paid by the federal government, who are in the chain of command.

This is essentially the civil service equivalent of a mutiny that we are talking about here, and this were the military, it would be a mutiny. And people are cheering this on. They think this is a good idea. Uh, it's not a good idea. It's disgraceful what's being done here. And it's also really destabilized. I'm talking about undermining institutions. The president can't trust senior White House officials to enact his policies and to obey his orders. That's a big problem.

There's also word for that, it's insubordination, and you can get fired for it, and you should. He is holding the line for America buck sex in his back. This is a genuine constitutional crisis. This is a moment where, uh, it's a crisis of conscience for people in the United States Senate on the other side of the aisle, where they have been willing to be more protective of their chairmanships, of their party, of their president than they have of

the Constitution and the institutions themselves. Oh yeah, he's running. Everybody remember him, John Kerry, a guy who miraculously married, very wealthy twice fund his political career. It's it's amazing how that happens. But he is gonna run again. I think he's in there now. When I said gonna run again, he's trying to position himself for a run. But when I think it's fashion is he calls us a constitutional

crisis because that sounds momentous. Right to call it a constitutional crisis is to put a lot of wom behind this thing, right, it's to make it seem like it's just full of gravity and gravitas and seriousness. Darn it. But it's a constitutional crisis in a way that John Kerry does not either want to admit or understand, and that is that the President of the United States is being undermined by his own government because they say so,

and they're doing it surreptitiously and quietly. That's not democratic, that's not constitutional. That subversion And as much as they claim that they're doing it in the best interests of the American people, the American people have not empowered them to make that decision. They are assuming that they are senior White House officials were talking about here in a role to help the president and help his agenda. He is the one who is given authority under the Constitution

because of the votes of the American people. They do not You know that this doesn't doesn't transfer over to them. You know that this is what maybe they need a little refresher course in basic civics. They're not a part of this as well. They're supposed to be helpful. I don't want to know what they're discretion they think should lead them to do. I just want them to execute or leave. I'm not saying they have to do it, folks.

And this is what people say, Oh, well, what if Trump was you know, he was ordering us to an attack of country and you know martial law, and yeah, then you resign, you come forward, you say that the president Trump is is uh out a line needs to be removed from office. Here's why. That's the mechanism. There are things in place. You see. What you keep having

is democrats abandoning the city. They talk about how the system is being undermined, and then the moment that the system doesn't work in their favor, they're willing to abandon it, destroy it, undermine it themselves. It's all about expedients. It's all about what gives them what they want in the moment that they wanted. There's no principle for them. There's just a pursuit of power. And that's why I find this whole situation with the op edge so frustrating, kind

of amusing in a way, but also disheartening. But John Carry continues on Place seventeen. It's really serious. It's uh, it's foreboding in so many different ways, because it really means I mean, have you have somebody stealing something off the president's desk in order to prevent him from making decision. You have him ordering generals to do something, and within a moment of them being ordered, they turned to their

fellow Jessey, we're not doing that. What it really means is we we don't have a president, and we have a president who's there, but he is not capable of doing the job or living up to the responsibilities. We don't have a president. Obama's former secretary of State says, I think that's de gross. I think that undermines the commander in chief, don't you. That's reckless. That goes way beyond disagreeing on policy or expressing one's First Amendment rights

as a citizen. To criticize government actions or decisions, that's something else, folks. That's really meant to destabilize, to delegitimize. That's the primary purpose, to find a way to give some justification to the thought process that I remember from the chance, from the marches, from the screaming, yelling, banshee like howls on the streets of Manhattan at the very beginning of the Trump presidency from the hashtag resistance yelling not my president, not my president. I remember that, and

now they think they can make that a reality. And John Kerry is giving the some degree of intellectual cover they think by also saying, we don't have a president right now. No, we do have a president. It's just one that they don't like. It's one that they disapprove of. You know, I did not think that Barack Obama was good at his job. I did not think he was anywhere near as qualified or as impressive as any of the Democrats that I knew. But I never thought he

wasn't actually the president. I just learned to live in the reality of, yeah, he's the president. Let's see how the next election goes. That's the normal adult response to this. I can't help but look at how here we are again, the second Republican president of my adult life. And also we're being told he's not really the president. He's a legitimate Just like with Bush, he wasn't really the president either.

The other Supreme Court gave him the election. They made whole movies, lots of fiction thrown in about how Bush didn't really win Florida. Uh, and it was stolen in the Supreme Court, and I was you know, he wasn't really legitimate. Oh and the popular vote by the day they trot that one out. This is like saying, um, well, you know we're running a mile race. Well I beat you that I'm faster than you for the first hundred yards, so I'm faster than you. Well that's not the race

we're running. This is this is an idiocy that keeps coming back up all the popular vote. The popular vote. They do not run campaigns based on the popular vote. If they did, Trump would have been a lot more time focused on New York and California. Okay, they don't run campaigns that way. That matters. It would change the dynamic. People like me who live in New York, who are or lived in New York, who are Conservatives would come out and vote in much larger numbers if we thought

it mattered because it was all about the overall vote total. Instead, I vote because I feel like I have to be some political analyst and I have to do that and blah blah and all that. But a lot of people in New Ork conservats like, what am I gonna vote

New York for? It's a joke. My vote means nothing, and realistically they're correct, so it's completely So that's why this whole popular vot think it's a it's a it's a canard, it's a red herring, it's b s. And that's why I just get tired of it, you know, engage on the real issues. Notice how folks were weeks away from the mid terms. We're not talking about health care, although I do we talked about healthcare, but I mean the country right now. I'm not discussing health care. Really,

not a lot of talk about immigration. They definitely don't want to talk about the economy. Why this economy is amazing right now? Very little interest though in addressing that. I don't want to get anywhere near there right So, why what are we supposed to be deciding on? How are the political narrative shaping up? You're seeing it? It's just this this media storytelling and this obsession with Trump as as not just bad, but Trump as evil. And I think that Trump is in good company because they

think this about all conservatives. They don't think that we're wrong. They think that we're bad people, and they've allowed themselves to have that mindset fester for far too long and it's long pastime when we should allow that to be, you know, a state of affairs that persists. I think it's time. By the way, I just saw us Burt Reynolds. Burt Reynolds passed away. Huh, legendary star of Smoky the Bandit, director and producer dead at eighty two. Man, I didn't

realize that, you know, John, do you? I never really saw Yeah, I just saw that now. I didn't see that before. I know it happened earlier. I'm seeing now when it went up on the site. Burt Reynolds. Huh. Interesting, you know, I never really I think I never really saw him. I never saw Smoking the band It. Maybe I'll have to Maybe I'll check it out this weekend. Although I've got that Jack Ryan Amazon. I needed to catch up on that and give because a lot of folks are ask me what I think of it. So

I'm gonna have to check that one out. I'm hearing good things. We are going to talk a bit about um, the way that the media cares about international opinion about this opped coming up in a second, and then the Kavanaugh hearings. Uh, Corey Booker doesn't realize that the papers he's going to share, have been cleared for being shared, but he thinks he's being tough about it. We'll get

to that. Stay with me. The fallout from the so called resistance opped about President Trump in the New York Times has gone international, and the overwhelming reaction from US allies in Europe seems to be less than a surprise. In fact, a German weekly has now replaced its coverage of the op ed with an eyebrow raising poll on the things Germans right now fear most coming at a number one with look at this President Trump. He beats out fear of refugees, over running Germany, at and terrorism,

which got fifty nine percent actual. Yeah, we're most scout of the President Trump. How trumpics so frightening? Oh no, what would you do? Somebody please save me from the trump ing? Oh Trump, e Trump the Germans. I think it's hilarious that the media thinks that we're all supposed to care what European papers say about our political squabbles. Here's a little here's a little news flash for them. We don't care, or at least normal people do not care.

Media loves this, though they always feel like the because the the extension of the elites in Europe. Is you know that they they think of elites in Europe as an extension of themselves and their own opinions. So they love to do this thing of the Europeans or anything. Think of how stupid that is. They're more concerned about Trump? How and what way? Are they more concerned about Trump than about the refugee problem that they've got, which is

big more about terrorism? I mean, what normal human being in Germany is worried about Donald Trump? I mean this, this is it's a fashion. It's a fad. Anti trump is. Um is something that simple minded people think about themselves so they can pretend to be sophisticated and informed. It's like climate change, folks. It's much more about fashion than it is about belief or knowledge. Um. So you know that's that's why. But I just love the Germans terrified

of Trumpets, like, oh no, what will we do? Trump is going to come and inved Us and steal all of all Hamburgers and Frankfurt and Venish Nitzel's. Uh it's man, it makes me want to call him freedom Fries again. And uh, I know that's French. But I was also thinking about we come up with a new name for hamburgers called freedom Burgers. You know, there you go, freedom burgers. I guess the burger. I think actually it's German too. It's just a stupid pole, the whole thing. It's it's

just ridiculous. But why they're even telling us about this on CNN. I think it's a fun wind, a window into their mindset and how they think. Oh, there's a globe, there's global fallout from this op ed in the New York Times about Trump not really, everything's fine. Everybody woke up today all over the world and their life was basically the same as it was the day before, regardless of that op ed. You know, this is I'm here to tell you it's all. It's all gonna be okay.

I'm here. I'm here to let you know it's gonna be fine, folks. I'm not saying we don't have problems, and they aren't bad things, they aren't bad guys, and but I'm been in terms of the of the uh, the consequences to any of us. You me of this op ed? Yeah, people really really need to chill out quite a bit. It's got to the point now where they need to seek help. Trump arrangement syndrome is is not. It's not just a clever thing we've come up with

to troll and own the lives. Like, yes, I talked about Trump arrangement syndrome to own the hibs, but I also really do think that there are people who have become somewhat deranged by their anti Trump hatred and and it's a it's a problem, it's something to something to worry about. I want to transition. You know, next hour, we're gonna talk quite a bit more about the the Kavanaugh hearings today, the whole Cavanaugh situation, and you know,

we'll get it. They had the usually an they're coming at them with this, and it's just it's exactly what I thought. A lot of hyperbole, a lot of really second and third tier legal minds, which is unfortunately what a lot of Democrats senators are. Um, so you know, a lot of them trying to come at Kavanaugh in a particularly pathetic fashion. But there was some other stuff that happened that I think was First of all, we're gonna get to Corey Booker's I Am Spartacus moment, which

you're not. You gotta hear that it's amazing, referred to himself as Spartacus. Corey Booker is trying so hard. Oh my gosh, it is. It is kind of painful to watch. He's really making a mockery of himself doing a great favor. I think for Kamala Harris, who's also trying way too hard on these issues, I mean, really going above and beyond what a normal person would expect a senator to do with the circumstances, because you know she she's also trying to really make an impression and start getting the

whole twenty thing going. This is all about the election, folks, all about who's gonna step up and be the leader of the Democratic Party. So those are the stakes. But Kamala Harris pushed Kavanaugh on So Mark Casuits is the lawyer for President Trump right now, he's President Trump's personal lawyer on the whole Russia probe thing. And she kept pushing him on this point. And when you hear the exchange, people, you know people, normal people here to say, what is

she badgering him about? I mean, he's obviously doesn't really know what she's talking about. But play the clip, John, have you discussed Malla or his investigation with anyone at Cassewitz, Benson and Torres, the law firm founded by Mark Cassewitz, President Trump's personal lawyer. All right, be sure about your answer, sir, um, Well, I'm not remembering, but if you have something you wanna, are you certain you've not had a conversation with anyone

at that law firm. That's not what he said. Casswitz, Benson and Torres, which is the law firm founded by Mark Cassewitz, who is President Trump's personal lawyer. Are you have you had any conversation about Robert Muller or his investigation with anyone at that firm? Yes? Or no? Well, is there a person you're talking I'm asking you a very direct question, yes or no. I need to know that. I'm not sure I know everyone who works with that

law firm. I don't think you need to. I think you need to know who you talk with, who'd you talk to? I don't think I'm not remembering, but I'm happy to be refreshed. I mean, he doesn't know everybody that works at that law firm. What the heck is she talking about? It is a big law firm. I mean, you know he doesn't know everybody how how so so you see, this is why And we'll return to this

because as Bluementhal kind of does the same thing. There's no good faith in these in these just in these hearings, folks, they want to try to get him on some little point of minutia and then try to crush him for being a liar. And he's just like, look, I don't remember, I don't know. I can't give you an answer because I don't really know. And and she's just trying to make such a big deal of it. You know what's

the really fun part of this, folks. The law firm today just decide to step in and they're like, nobody from our firm ever talked to Kavanaugh about any of this stuff. Nobody. Okay, so what the heck is Kamala Harris talking about? Yeah, who knows, But that was just

so funny people that, yeah, she's taking it to him. Yeah, it's like, why does why did they get so much joy out of Well, it's because they don't like his politics, right, we all know the answer, but it's so it's just so gross this guy having as a good guy, you know, I mean, and look, the history of Republicans appointing judges. Is that even when they think they're getting a conservative constitutionals on the bench, about half of ours go bad

once they get past the process. So who knows. But anyway, the Democrats are making asses of themselves. We'll get into that coming up. Global Verification Network the only dual certified veteran owned background investigation and vetting company. Folks, when you're hiring or you have a property that you're trying to lease out to somebody, you're looking at tenants, you're looking at possible employees. You need somebody that you can trust

who's efficient, discreet and gets the job done. That's Global Verification Network. I know the CEO, Mark Buckman personally. He's a totally squared away guy, a Navy vet, and he really cares about the work that he and his team are doing every day. Are headquartered in Chicago, and their risk mitigation experts will work with startups all the way up to Fortune one D companies. No data or client information is ever off short. You know that's different. A

lot of the other guys send stuff overseas. You're paying somebody so they can pay somebody else in a foreign country to do this work for you you don't want that, go with Global Verification call eight seven seven six nine eleven seventy nine, or go to my g VN dot com and tell them buck Sexton SENTI buck Sexton Mission decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, American rank, You're a great American Again. This

is the buck Sexton Show. Activita Analysts. No, I knowingly violated the rules that were put forth, and I'm told that the committee confidential rules have knowing consequences. And so, sir, I come from a long line as all of us do as Americans, and understand what that kind of civil disobediences. And I understand the consequences. So I am right now before your before your process is finished, I'm going to

release the email about racial profiling. And I understand that that the penalty comes with potential outsting from the Senate. And if Senator Cornin believes that I violated Senate rules, I openly invite and accept the consequences of my team releasing that email right now. I'm releasing it to expose that Number one, the emails are being withheld from the

public have nothing to do with national security. What I'm releasing this document right now to show, sir, is that we have a process here for a person the highest office in the land for a lifetime appointment. We're rushing through this before me and my colleagues can even read and digest the information. Corey Booker, everybody looking for his big moment today, Corey Booker, who clearly has some twenty twenty action in his sights, although I just don't think

he's got it. There's something a little j V about Corey Booker. I'm I'm just calling it like I see, it just just doesn't have it. You know, I think there are other people that they are gonna be. I think that you get. I think Biden, Hillary, Heck, I think Bernie goes ahead of Corey in the line for

the Democrats. I really do. He's just and it's there's something a little desperate about his whole you know, I'm just America and that's the highest office in the land, and I'm just so upset about all this what's going on.

It's just kind of hysterical. This whole thing in the hearing today was all it was a lot of you know, just just calm down, Corey it's it's all gonna be okay, you know, but he but he the big thing here is that he he got some documents and he said, you know, I'm gonna release them even though not supposed to. So he says, I'm gonna violate Senate rules. I'm gonna forget Senate rules. I'm just gonna go for it. I'm

gonna violate them because that's how important this is. And then it just brings you back to see Democrats don't really believe in rules. They don't really believe in this stuff. They they talk about rules and rule of law and all, but but at the end of the day, they just want to do what they want to do. And you know, they use the rules when it benefits them. They ignore the rules when it when it benefits them to ignore them.

And so you know, he says this, and he's got his big moment of you know, I understand the penalty comes with the potential outstick from the Senate and he gets into it a little bit with the Senator corn In on this one. Senator cordings like, let's go, let's let's let's throw down play clip eight. There is no Senate rule that that I violated because there's no Sentate rule that accounts for this process. I read the Senate Rule twenty nine five, the Standing Rules of the Senate

for the benefit of all Senators. Any Senator, officer or employee the Senate who shall disclose the secret or confidential business or proceedings of the Senate, including the business and proceedings of the Committees, subcommittees, and offices of the Senate, shall be liable if a Senator to suffer expulsion from the body, and if an officer or employee to dismissal from the service of the Senate, and the punishment ring or contempt. So I would bring a I would correct

the senator's statement. There is no rule. There is clearly a rule that applies in a final rum, and bring the charges, bring it, Bring it. Corey Booker, Man, he's tough. We mean Alex Jones shall be the Cory Booker. He's tough. He's a tough guy. Oh, yamage tough guy. Uh it was pretty bring it okay, Corey Booker. He goes even further, folks. I mean Booker was really men at theatrics today. He was he was really trying to get some love from that camera. Pay attention to me, Pay attention to me.

That's what the senator from New Jersey was doing today. And you can't make this stuff up. Stuff up, folks. Here here's where he went next, play nine. I think this is about the closest I'll probably ever have in my life to an I am Spartacus moment. Uh. My colleagues, numerous them said that they too accept the responsibility. There are very seriousness charges that were made against me by my colleague from Texas. I don't know if they were

a political bluster or sincere feelings. If what he said was sincere, there actually are Senate rules governing the behavior of senators. If he feels that I and now my fellow colleagues who are with me have violated those rules. If he's not a tempest in a teapot, but sincerely believes that, then bring the charges. Go through the Senate process to take on somebody that you said is unbecoming to be a senator. Let's go through that process. Corey

Booker is not Spartacus, everybody, I am Spartacus moment. Nope, it is not. It is not a Spartacus moment. It is a you really want Rachel Matt out to play a good long clip of you on MSNBC to Night moment, which I'm sure she I'm sure she's probably doing it. Well, not right now because he's not on Well, it depends on when you're listening to this, but she probably did it at some point tonight. Look, he's Booker wants to get to the front of the hashtag resistance line. I

get it, folks, you get it too. I like gout Chuck Grassley, who's unfortunately Chuck grassle impersonation sounds a little bit like my Senator lah impersonation, which is Erber. But grass Lely pointed out that you don't. Booker just keeps you know, Yeah, yesterday he was saying this thing about, you know, I wouldn't accept an intern with nine percent of the application. And as I said, you know, Senator Booker, if an intern sent you four d and pages of

an application, you'd call the Capitol police. It's just a dumb thing from to keep repeating over and over again. Gradually also called onto the fact that Booker just seems to he just he just thinks he's on a loop here, just gotta keep repeating and repeating and repeating play ten. No sentate rule accounts for Bill Burke's parts in review of the documents. There is no centate rule that that I violated, because there's no center rule that accounts for

this process. No centate rule. And I'm told that the committee confidential rules have knowing consequences, and I understand the consequences and accept the consequences. I'm going to release the email about racial profiling of my team, releasing that email right now. What I'm releasing this document right now to show and I'm releasing it. Can I ask you? And I don't ask you. Can I ask you how long

you're going to say the same thing three or four times? No, sir, I want I'm saying I'm nolingly violating the rules album for it. May I say, I'm saying right now that I'm releasing I'm releasing Committee Competentist. How many times? How many times grass at more like grassle Um, how many times he's right? Booker won't stop saying the same darn thing over and over again? And it's just tedious, man like, get a grip, get a grip, this whole thing. I I would have loved it if they just said you know,

we're gonna we're gonna bag it. We're gonna bag it. We're gonna just get out of this and uh, we're gonna find a We're just gonna have a vote. And that's it. We're done. It's been real, everybody, it's it's it's been fun at all. But we don't need to have another another full week here of of total and absolute grandstanding. Um, what we need are just more more leftist showing up on TV to remind us why we

shouldn't vote for them. Play eighteen, A new technology was an invasion of your property and and and therefore was something that violated them. So and whole streets are streets occupies. Stand it. Hearing people are the worst, the worst, But you know, the vote Democrats, so the media goes easy on them. You'll notice that the really bad behavior comes from the left and all these things because they don't like making arguments. They like people just tell them they're right.

Oh well it is what it is, my friends. Um, we have a whole lot more coming up, a bit more on the some of the back and forth today. What does a perjury trap sound like? Folks? I want to get to that and uh, also, is McCabe going to prison for perjury? Remember the acting FBI director that's

coming up. If you've ever found yourself wincing at the week taste of coffee from one of those left leaning corporate COMI brands, you probably thought, I wish they spent less time on meaningless bias training, bathroom policy reform and other things at the five common sense, and more time on their coffee. That's why, my friends, you need yourself some Black Rifle coffee. I drink Black Rifle every day. I'm in fact in their coffee club. I get it

delivered to me at the beginning of every month. I get my cake cups, Silence or Smooth Freedom Blend, you name it, I got it, and every in my office who tries it loves it. They are all switching to Black Rifle coffee. They're ditching that comy stuff and buying coffee from a bunch of patriots, veterans and people who love this country and love some delicious joe. So check

it out for yourself. Visit Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck and receive fifteen percent off your order again Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash buck for fifteen percent off Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash buck also check out the gear they've got on the side off. Have you ever talked to anybody in the White House about the Special Council investigation? I've had no discussions with people

in the White House about the No one. I have had no issues where I've discussed my views on any matters, issues, cases, no hints, previews, forecasts. But have you ever talked about the Special Council investigation with Don McGann, who is behind you or anyone else in the White House. That's a

simple yes or no that I'm not about. I'm not remembering any discussions like that, of course, and preparing for this hearing, I've prepared prepared for questions like the one you're asking, Well, what discussions have you had about the Special Council with people in the White tim have not had discussions. It's pretty simple English. Have you talked about the Special Counsel with anyone in the White House? That was anybody who works for the President United States? Right?

You just rephrased the question though, and that was about Mr Muller this time and previously, is about the investigation because you haven't talked to anyone in the White House about Robert Mueller or the Special Counsel investigation. So you change the question again, center. You know, it's like Kavanaugh is a legal super nerd made from the parts of lesser legal nerds, and all these wannabes in the Senate are just trying to trying to jump on him, and

he's swapping them away time and time again. I mean, but folks, that was an instructive little little clip there, because when when people say things that just tell the truth, just tell the truth. What is the truth when you're being asked a question six different ways and the question changing, but the person asking it thinks they're asking the same question.

You know. Blumenthal, by the way, it reminds me of you know, he could play like the creepy, weird you know, funeral home guy that like no one knows what he's doing when the doors are closed and everybody leaves at night. I mean, he's a weirdo. I mean, he just there's something very whoever's voting for that guy, he just everything about him is is is creepy. What else to say? But he says that five you know, he asked him

five different times about talking to Special Council. Think about this though, And you also had this with uh Kamala Harris, where you know, she's saying, did you ever speak to somebody who well, you know, he doesn't know everybody who works at that law firms? How can he answer that question? And don't think for a second you already know this.

Remember what they did to Jeff Sessions, right, Jeff Sessions was asked about Russia context and he's like, no, I didn't have any like campaign Russia context, and like, oh, well, well here you met the ambassador in a public event with you know, five people there and shook his hand. Liar And he's like, he's like a lady anyway, He's like, what do you what do you mean? You know, that's not what you were really, that's not what you were

asking about. And you know, he can't really be expected to remember that, Kenny, And they said, oh, he's a liar, they were saying, Jeff Sesson. So so you can't expect these people to have any good faith or goodwill. And with with with these questions, they're specifically trying to get him on something where they can say that he lied, and that then becomes that it doesn't matter how small it is. Folks. Oh, you mean like this is how

the Special Counsel would do things. To say Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn and others, just keep asking questions, get somebody to get something that is technically not true, even if they're not trying to tell you something that is not true, and then hammer them for being a liar, hammer them for perjury. This is a perjury trap. It's a real thing. It goes to the bad faith of the cross examining party, the prosecutor in this case, the Senator Bloomenthal is the

ultimate in bad faith. Oh, I mentioned the Casuwits law firm thing. Bloomenthal went down that road with with Kabin on to night Play. Have you had conversations about the Special Council Investigation with anyone at the Casswitz, Benson and Tourists firm. No, I don't remember anything like that. Are you acquainted with anyone at that firm? I know Ed McNally used to work at the White House Council's office, and I now I understand that he works at that

law firm. Have you ever talked to him about the Special Council investigation? Now? Are you acquainted with Mark casswith I'm not Are you acquainted with uh anyone else at the Casswits law firm. I don't believe so, But as I discussed with Senator Harris last night, I didn't know. For example, Senator Lieberman worked at that firm and he spoke to the judges a couple of years ago before this. But that's the kind of thing I was worried about when I was talking with Senator Harris last night. Has

said it. I don't have the full roster, but I'm pretty confident the answer is no. Okay. I mean, this whole thing is really a joke in a way. Right, There's nothing that they're not trying to get any underlying

truth here. This isn't about understanding his judicial philosophy. This is about senators who are doing one of two things, grandstanding for their own purposes Democrats that is, grand standing for their own purposes, or trying to jam up Kavanaugh, who is as good a legal mind as exists from everything that we know about him, as good a legal mind as there is out there. But you know what really summarizes this for Let's let's take us let's step

away from Senators for a second. And here Nancy Pelosi, who really summarizes what the left wing Democrat point of view is on this guy without the documents that they say they don't have. Without, you know, Pelosi is at least telling you what they really think. Play the team. This week, the nation has witnessed the confirmation hearing from the most radical anti healthcare, anti choice Supreme Court nominees in recent history, a nominee who thinks the President Trump

is above the law. If Judge Covnaugh is confirmed, Roby Wade, affordable healthcare, voting rights, common sense, gun violence, prepension, the freedoms of LGBTQ Americans, communities of colors, and immigrants are all on the chopping luck, just to name a few. And if he doesn't believe in star disasters, that established law, everything is on the table. Began voting rights, civil rights, Brown versus the Board of Education, voting rights and civil

rights on the chopping block. If this Yale educated d C. Circuit Court you, almost unanimously approved by the Senate judge, gets on the Supreme Court, you know, I have no sympathy for liberals on this at all. They have they we're way too reliant on the Supreme Court for way too long as their super legislature. So I have no sympathy for them at all. But but Pelosi here, I would say she's I would say she's an imbecile, and I wouldn't be wrong, but it's it's really actually just shameless.

You know, she is doing what she can two stir up her base, and she'll say anything. And you know, I gotta say something, folks. We have the left and and this has been a recurring theme this week. The left talks about how we need to have, you know, better decorum, and you know Trump is, you know, he's

so rough around the edges. And then i't like this and not about him, but but the truth is this, Uh, we shouldn't allow ourselves to normalize what the Democrats are doing this week, either the Senators or somebody like Nancy Pelosi, which is to malign a good man. You know, Nancy Pelosi is part of a machine here that is saying horrible and untrue thing about an American who's a good guy, a brilliant man, a family man, and who has been

honorable based on everything we know his entire life. Alright, his biggest sin was spending a little too much money on baseball tickets for like himself and his family. And it's not a sin, even though I think baseball sometimes goes on a little too long. So we shouldn't just say, oh, well, you know, it's politics. No, it's not politics. What Nancy

Pelosi is doing is dishonorable. That that statement she made their on Kavanaugh is disgraceful, all right, She's not just it's one thing to say I don't like him on row, I don't like him on these things, to say that voting rights are on the chopping block, civil rights are on the line, to call him radical an anti healthcare? Does she I mean, does she realize how stupid that sounds? Now? The answer is yeah, she does. She doesn't care though,

because she's trying to. She's really preaching to a choir of left wing idiots, and they don't care how stupid it sounds. They like the way it sounds, and so Pelosi, in that respect, is giving them exactly what they want. It's it's pathetic, it's kind of sad, and we shouldn't let it go. He's back with you now, because when it comes to the fight for truth, the fuck never stops.

We cannot blindly follow this president and his incompetency, which is a theme throughout this book, and his recklessness and his disconcern for the national interest uh in favor of his own interest. It is time for the Republicans to say the Trump presidency is a national emergency, and it is up to us both parties to treat the Trump

presidency as a national emergency. It would seem to me that General Kelly Uh in the interest of the country needs to resign and with its statement that says the presidency can no longer be entrusted to this man, wind Bag Woodward on the march, folks. He's got his book coming out. We're gonna I'm trying to get him on trying to get him on Rise and Look, I'll try to get him on radio two. I mean, I'll do what I can get him to to tune in and uh and check us out. But uh, this, this notion

of Trump is a national emergency. I I really I want to pull this apart a little bit because we have had such a week here with the non op ed and and now you've got more people to talking aboutment. You'll notice I'm I'm correct on this one, folks. It all happens right after uh, it becomes clear that they're not going to get the perjury trap option with the mother probe against Trump. Now, all of a sudden, we're back to amendment. You know that that he can be

removed to be removed via the amendment. And and that's what I think, you know, the timing of this is is all very suspect to me. Um, It's all very clear in my view that what's going on here is, uh, you know, you have a situation where they're just moving to the next thing. Um, They're they're moving to the next version of how it is that they don't have to have that how it is that Trump is no

longer president anymore. Here here is the tent. By the way, in case of the removal of the president from office, or of his death or resignation, the president of the vice president rather shall become president. Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the vice president, the President shall uh nominate a vice president who shall take office upon a confirmation by a majority vote of both houses

of Congress um. And then whenever the vice president and a majority of other principal officers or the of the Executive Departments, or of such other body as Congress may provide by law, transmit to the President pro Temporary of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. The Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office

as acting president. So that's the that's what they're going for now, oh, twenty fifth Amendment. All the time they think that John Kelly is really going to resign and make a statement that the president shouldn't be the president anymore. I I can't help but feel like, what are we? What is? What do they want us to make of the following? Let's turn to the facts for a moment. Here.

We were told by the same media, and I don't mean the same media in general terms, I mean the same people in the media, the same outlets, the same individuals, the same editorial boards. We were told that Barack Obama was an almost godlike super genius who was going to slow the rise of the seas and heal the planet and make everything wonderful and perfect. You know, there'd be unicorns and bunnies and you know, streams of candy corn or you know whatever. Right, if it's just gonna be amazing,

it was gonna be fantasy land for us. I'm only slightly exaggerating. You know that it was said that he was gonna heal the planet. He said he was gonna heal the planet, and he's gonna slow the rise of the season. What we had with Obama was, no matter who you are, I think very disappointing. The economy was growing at a snail like pace. We had race riots, so the whole racial healing component of the Obama administration

was certainly not as as originally advertised. Uh, you know they Obamacare is the only law that people have ever tried actively the people writing the law to make sure doesn't in any way apply to them or anybody that they can make sure it's not something that can be

of avoid being subject to it. Didn't get anything done on immigration with Congress, didn't get anything done on the environment despite all the big bluster and talk about it, and just it wasn't a particularly good time for the country. A lot of terrorism, the rise of ices, major terrorist attacks on US soil, going on, major terrorist tax against our allies and it just it just didn't work out, folks.

So that's the reality of the Obama administration. Now I need someone to explain to me if Trump is this bumbling buffoon, if he's like a an evil Mr. Magoo, which is kind of you know, with with bad taste and gaudy gold fixtures. They got to explain to me. What do we make of the fact that Trump is doing a great job. What do we make of the fact that Trump is presiding over an economy that's the

best economy we've seen in decades. In some ways, people say, given you know the position of America right now, and that's probably the best economy, might be the best economy the country has ever had, you can make that argument. And we're not invading countries that we shouldn't. We're not in the midst of a of a nasty war where

we're losing soldiers every day. We are losing some still in a Rock and Afghanistan, but the numbers are considerably smaller, still too many, but smaller than what we would have seen under the Busher Obama administrations. So we're not starting some big war. The country is doing great. You know, We've got some issues. We're trying to handle them. Maybe they'll still be some infrastructure bill for those of you who want that. Maybe they'll still be a wall, although

I'm starting to get pretty doubtful. But overall things are good. So Bernstein running around saying he's a national emergency, what do they expect, really, you and me to take away from that? It's an emergency that I'm seeing a lot of people that are finally feeling, especially from my generation, like we're getting our economic legs under us. You know, we got a little bit of optimism about our future. Maybe we'll buy a house, maybe start a family. Because

there's a big problem with millennials with that. We're supposed to be angry at Trump. Because of this, businesses across the board are saying it's a better business environment than they've seen in years and years. Maybe, ever, is that is the national emergency that Trump is so successful despite all the things that they told us would happen if he became president. Because if that's the national emergency, you know what, I'm okay with it. I think we're all

gonna be just fine. But remember what happened to the Conservatives when they were shadow band First Twitter said they did not do it. Now Jack admitted that it did happen with their algorithm, and it happened not based upon what those individuals were doing on Twitter, but who followed them, and they never even explained it. They're too strong to call it censorship. I don't think so, because look at it.

Just take a perspective here. If you googled the California Republican Party two weeks before the primary election, it's said our ideology was Nazism. We've had senior engineers and Facebook who are conservative actually bring a group together because they feel it's mob mentality where they're being intimidated because of their own personal views. It's just a real problem. It is a real problem, folks. We got some big I'm

I'm just gonna foreshadow here a little bit. You have to stay with me because I want to I want to change the topics real quickly. But we're gonna have some big news for you coming up at the top of the next hour on the social media shadow banning side of things. One that's going to get a lot of attention to bring this issue to the forefront. So that's just consider that a little preview that we're putting

in year before we get to it. But the next hour we will talk about what's happening here with with social media sites banning people and who's that what's the next shoe to drop? But I want to just take a moment here to remind everyone that well we constantly and next hour I'll talk to us about Papa Papa do Polis and how he's going to give his first

TV interview. But while we're always reminded that there are these people associated with Trump who have been prosecuted and they've either been found guilty in the case of somebody like a Maniford, or they have pleaded guilty ahead of time and trying to get a reduced sentence. That there's somebody else who's on the hot seat here, and he's

a big fish, folks. McCabe, former FBI Deputy director, the number two at the fb I, who was neck deep in the Russia collusion investigation and all the stuff going on there. Who's obvious, guys, he's obviously a Democrat. Okay, his wife's a big Democrats. Obviously a Democrat. The the the high level bureaucrats tend to be leftists. The rank, the rank, and file in law enforcement, and to some

it's a little more mixed and intelligence. But the rank and file and law enforcement tend to be, if not GOP conservatives, at least a little traditionalist in their point of view, you know, because I have to deal with the real world and law and order and good guys and bad guys. But the you know, the the guys that thrive in bureaucracies tend to be bureaucratic creatures, and

those people tend to be leftists, progressives. So, Andy McCabe, here's what's going on, and it's not getting a fraction of the coverage it would if we were changing around some of the political dynamics. Here, here's the latest from the Washington Post. Federal prosecutors have for months been using a grand jury to investigate former FBI Director Andrew McCabe, an indication the probe and whether he misled officials exploring his role in a controversial media disclosure, has intensified, two

people familiar with the matter said. The grand jury has summoned more than one witness, the people said, and the case is ongoing. The presence of the grand jury shows prosecutors are treating the matter seriously, locking in the accounts of witnesses who might later have to testify at a trial, but such panels are sometimes used only as investigative tools, and it remains unclear if Mr McCabe will ultimately be charged.

A spokesman for the U. S. Attorney's Office in d C, which has been handling the probe, declined to comment, as did a spokeswoman for McCabe. Okay, guys, the former deputy director of the FBI might be going to prison. That's what you really need to take away that. That's what you need to have in mind here, all right, You're not getting nearly enough of a focus on the fact that think about that, folks, When was the last time

he was the acting director for a while? When was the last time the number two at the Federal Bureau of Investigation was in serious, credible threat of going to prison? By the way, I think he I think he is going to end up taking a police bargain. I think I think they're going to charge him because they have to charge him. And see this is you know, there's that there's that phrase. I don't know where it comes from. Those who live by the sword died by the sword.

Producer Mike, where does that come from? I've always said that. You know, it's a phrase I've known for a long time. Is it biblical? I mean, it sounds biblical. But I didn't want to be that media ignoramus that claims something's in the Bible when it's actually, you know, Shakespeare or something that doesn't sound Shakespeare. You know what I mean? Um, his producer, Mike even is he is he out with the with the you know, the ladies from the front

office of the finance thing downstairs. Yeah, he's okay, he's he's not on a coffee break with a bunch of ladies. We'll see, we'll see about that. We got eyes on you, producer, Mike, don't don't, don't try anythings. Don't try anything too smooth. So look there, your reality here is You've got this guy who has for a long time put people away for lying under growth FBI agents. I look, I get this right, and I don't mean to you. Gotta be fair to law enforcement, used to the tools that they

have to get people. I don't like the notion of law enforcement approaching investigations or prosecutions like they have to get scalps. I don't like that that's not the way it should be. But they're also going to use the tools they have to go after people when they think they're supposed to go after people. And that's why one the United States Criminal Code about lying to federal federal officers is show it's look, it's very useful for them, but it's got to be a two way street, folks,

meaning or not even a two way street. It's gotta be everybody on the same on the same playing field. Keep in mind, the FBI can lie to you, So you sit down and talk to the FBI. They can lie to you as much as they want. They can say that your wife has sold you out already already, you know, told them everything they've got you, and this is your last chance to save yourself whatever. And meanwhile, they haven't even talked to your wife. They can't even find her. They can lie to you all they want.

You cannot lie to that. Well, that seems a bit. That's quite a power and balance, isn't. That's why I always telling you, don't ever, ever, ever, ever, ever ever talked to the FBI. You know, this is bucks one of my rules for life were comfortable shoes and never talked to the FBI. If nothing else, if you take those two things from the Buck Sexton Show, it will all of the time you've spent with me, folks will be well well worth it. But McCabe lied more than once.

It's already it's already been adjudicated in the sense that his you know, the internal investigators at the FBI have said, yeah, that's right, he lied. So we already know that he lied under oath, how do they get how does he get out of this now? Or they said he was like just now now, pump up, I gotta very careful. I think they said he was less than truthful. And what you're gonna see, what you're gonna see them try

to do. Um, what they're gonna try to do is essentially a version of what they did for Hillary, where they're gonna use weasel words and they're gonna, you know, they're gonna try to create a circumstance where he didn't lie, but he was less than truthful. You know that they're just gonna create some little gray area to give him

a get out of jail free card. Um. But look, Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired McCabe alright, twenty four hours before he was set to retire and so cost him a lot of his and going out look, going after someone's pension, folks, for public servants, that's that is a big deal for them, and that's considered as very The only punishment more severe than that, and for somebody at that stage of their career is prison. I mean, that's it. If they go after your pension, they're really making a

statement about it. And I just want to know, I mean, basically ahead of the FBI for all intents and purposes, because he was acting director for a while. The former had of FBI is probably going to prison folks over this Trump situation. And everyone likes to on the left likes to act like this was all done the up and up, it's not a witch on. Well, why do we have people, top level people the FBI who are

probably gonna go to prison? And you say, well, Buck, why would McCabe lie four times three of them under oath about his contacts with the media on this thing, unless unless he was trying to cover something up or was dirty. And here's where we're gonna here's where we're

gonna have a real problem. The FBI cannot cannot continue to testify in in criminal proceedings against normal everyday Americans and have their word be taken seriously and testify on issues like lying under oath and send you and me to prison for that. When FBI officers aren't held, aren't held to account for it, it cannot happen. So I think McCabe is a big trouble, folks. That would be the big that would be the first member of the hashtag resistance and the deep state to go to prison.

I think that's gonna happen. So that's that news report today was significant. Let's talk about the bomb shell news about social media. It's just to just break in here. I'm just seeing it. Bombshell news about a social media platform that we have to share with you. It's gonna spur a lot of conversation tomorrow. And I'm telling you, folks, we are we are in the early stages of a media war for platforms and the ability to get the

truth out that's coming up in just a moment. I talked about simply save home security a lot on the show. It's a great security system, fantastic protection, very easy to us. Well, I've got exciting news for you, folks, simply Safe, which is the system I have at home. Is valued it

over a billion dollars now, and that's gonna. Simply Safe protects over two million people, gives them comprehensive protection for their home with round the clock, professional monitoring and police dispatch, simple as a protects you against intruders, fires, leaks, and burst pipes, and it keeps working even during power outages, down WiFi, you name it, even if a burglar smashes your keypad. The system is easy to use, very intuitive, takes just minutes to set up, seven monitoring only fourteen

month folks. It's a great deal. It's a great system. I can't recommend it more highly than I do. Order your simply Safe system now. My listeners get free shipping and free returns. It's simply Safe dot Com slash buck that's simply Safe. S I m p l I Safe dot Com slash buck buck sextmission decoding the news and disseminating information who is actionable until make no mistake, American,

You're a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Analysts, No, oh wow, this just broke today just a little bit, just a little bit before I'm I went on the air. I see here that Twitter has permanently banned Alex Joneses and info Wars accounts. He said the accounts violated the company's abusive behavior policies. The band comes weeks after Jones was banned or suspended by other major tech companies like Apple, Facebook,

and YouTube. Wow, Jones has now been deep platform from all three the big three social media social media companies Apple and Tunes, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Well, I guess four. Then it depends on how we want to talk about it. But yeah, the tech giants, the biggest tech companies in in the Internet world are are tossing Jones out entirely. And this, folks, you know, this is the problem I have with it, Okay, because I know, look, I'm not somebody.

I'm not somebody who has any fondness at all for Alex Jones. As you're all well aware, he's like buck sex and I've seen that that smoke, look that's satisfied. Look he's like he's one of those coward like guys. It comes to barbecue. When I was back in Dallas, and you know, it's a blah blah blah, and I was just like, dude, you know, honestly, I've got I've got about five inches and a lot a lot more, a lot more trading than Marco Rubio. So I check

yourself before you wreck yourself, Mr Jones. But this is a problem, folks. It's not a problem for me that Alex Jones is banned. It's that there's a precedent being set here that people will be banned from these platforms based upon political ideology. If you think, and I don't, I don't think any of you do. But anybody who believes that the left will be content to stop at Alex Jones is fooling themselves. There is absolutely no way that it will just be Alex Jones here. It's just

not it's just not. I mean, i'd say it's not possible. But they're going to use this now and and continue to push. And what's going to happen is that these these online activist types, including Sleeping Giants and others who make their that their reason for existence is to try to to put online pressure campaigns against conservatives. I mean Sleeping Giants, which is this progressive you know hit organization um mostly on Twitter, but does it using other social

media platforms too. I believe they they go after people and they try to bring maximum pressure against sponsors very quickly, and people get scared. Right. All you need is the executive suite at some company to say, you know what, we don't want this problem, let's just cave, let's just give in, and and that they've been able to do this with with Twitter. Remember Twitter was the hold out folks.

Twitter was the one company that was saying, you know, I really think that we should at least, you know, hold off on banning people. And Dorsey was somebody that seemed like he really believed in free speech and the freak exchange of ideas. You know, as far as I understand it, as far as I understand it, Alex Jones has And now I could be wrong, so don't don't don't bet on this one. But to my knowledge, Alex Jones has not uh threatened to kill anybody. He has

not called for the rape and or murder of of anybody. Um, he said terrible things. Don't get me wrong, but there's a difference between actionable speech that's calling for violence or or harm to somebody and just speech that's really gross. Uh. And you have to ask the question, Okay, why is Louis farakon still on Twitter if it's just speech that

is really odious. You know why is Media Matters for America allowed to stay on Twitter pretending to be a public a public education foundation or whatever it calls itself. It's a five oh one C three, it's it's a it's a taxpayer boondoggle of of left wing attack ideology

that that's all Media Matters is. It's a really uh it's It's one of the few organizations I'll tell you that when I've had to come across Media Matters people, I I actively dislike them because I think that they're trying to really harm people, destroy people's livelihoods, and they're not judicious about it at all. They just want to They just want to ruin people. They're a bit like Gawker, which was a website that Peter Thielman people have. He's done a lot of great stuff in the business world.

I don't think anything he's done is as great as take the takedown of of Gawker, which was a site dedicated to the destruction of human beings, reputations, and lives, and it was just it was the worst. It was a sewer um. Anyways, look, Jones is really he's really bad stuff. He's come after me a couple of times. I find him to be both laughable as in pathetic and laughable as in somewhat entertaining sometimes because he's he's unintentionally uh quite you know, quite amusing at times. But

this is not going to stop with Jones. It's not going to be the end of it. Next they're gonna go after and they're gonna build. They're smart about this, folks. Next they're gonna go after Bannon, you know. Next, they're gonna go after somebody that they say has some ties to white nationalists or something. And you know, I can tell you that this has come up with a few of my liberal colleagues recently, where they've said, you know, I heard that so and so has ties to white nationalists.

You know, can you really are you really okay with having that person say on your radio show or on your I say, what does that mean? Ties to white name is the personal white nationalists? Does the person actively associate with white nationalists? If the answers to those questions are no, what are we really talking about here? Um?

Once you start to see these stories and you already know about the double standard, right, But the stories about how they want people fired, The left wants conservatives fired for attending things where somebody else attended. You know that that is a bad person basically. I mean the the guilt by association that they're doing now and really diving into people's social media history and everything. You know, they are in a takedown campaign. They can't win the battle

of ideas, folks. They got nothing. Socialism fails, all right, it's it fails that Americans. Actually, when Americans know what it is, they don't want it. So they want to control the distribution of information because they can't win in a battle over information. And that's why the Alex Jones Twitter Twitter was the last holdout, and now they've banned him. It's troubling because I know, and you know, this is not the end of it. This is not oh okay,

it's just gonna be Alex Jones. You know, they had folks. I mean, I I have tremendous respect for uh Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro, um, other people too who I can't think of off the top of my head. But but those two for example, and you know they their names will appear in uh you know oh, you know, as part

of the intellectual dark web. I mean, there there was a New Yorker piece I think it was, or maybe it was New York Magazine where they talked about a straight up white nationalist, and then Ben Shapiro and then I think it was Jordan Peterson. It's like those people do not belong together at all, you know, there's not there's no similarity. It's just smear. That's what they're doing. They're trying to smear people. They're going to continue to do it. And and there This is a this is

a movement, folks. This is something that's it's growing, it's current, it's it's happening right now, and they're trying to rack up as many winds as they possibly can and to create more momentum so they can get because once you're a d platform, you know, then you gotta kind of try to scratch your way back into relevance and into

the conversation. This is why I've been saying for a long time, and I don't like to be like I've been serrying I've been, but you know, it's true that these Silicon Valley giants, this is how they this is how the left starts to win the national conversation. Again, that's once you understand those are the stakes. And by the way, I would love for more of you to be on Twitter. It's one thing that if you know, I'm not a Twitter pitchman, I'm not trying to you know,

get their numbers, get their numbers up. But it's a great way for all of us to communicate with each other. It really is, and it's a really good way once you develop a facility with it for in very rapid fashion, seeing what's going on and seeing what people are saying about something. And Conservatives, folks, we are not on Twitter, in in in big numbers. We are not. We are

you know. I think I think when I was at the Blaze and we did some audience testing to get a sense of what the social media presence was, all the people listening to this radio show, over of you are on Facebook, um and now some are very active, some are not that active. And that's across also, and I've got I've got twenty year olds, I've got people actually think we're even you know, fourteen fifteen sixty to

listen to this show. Based on some of the call ins and emails we've gotten and I got people going all the way up probably into triple digits, you know, and we we we cover the whole range. And about plus, if you're on Facebook, less than five percent of you, I think it's even more like less than two percent of you listening to this broadcast or on Twitter, and I understand. Look, it doesn't mean that you need to

be sharing your thoughts. I know it's a liability for people, but it's a great You don't have to even put up a photo of yourself. You just use it as a means of sorting through news and commentary. And also in Buck does something on TV or whatever, you can be like, hey Buck, I saw you. That was good, which will cancel out the mean liberals who were like, won't you go shut your face? Because your face? And I'm like, but I just wanted to talk about tax policy.

Why can't we be friends? Shut up your face. I guess life says your face, and you win the argument. So the Twitter Twitter band Alex Jones, Folks, there's more of this, Come and keep an eye on it. This is gonna be a battle, and it does it does really matter. The implications here are our major uh and there's a lot of um, a lot at Steak, including really who's going to be in power in this country going forward? So we'll be back just a moment. Stay

with me. Hiring is challenging, but there's one place you can go where hiring a simple, fast and smart, a place where growing businesses connect to qualified candidates. That place is zip recruiter dot com, slash buck. Zip recruiter sends your job to over a hundred of the webs leading job boards. They don't stop there, though. What they're powerful matching technology. Zipp Recruiter scans thousands of resumes to find people at the right experience and invite them to apply

to your job. Zip recruiters so effective that eight percent of employers who post on zip recruiter get a qualified candidate through the site within the first day. Folks, I've used zip recruiter for hiring and I've got some great colleagues now that we found through this site. I can attest to it myself from personal experience. It works. You'll get the best people for whatever your job posting is. With results like that, it's no wonder the zip recruiter

is the highest rated hiring site in America. Right now, you can try zip recruiter for free. That's right free at zip recruiter dot com, slash buck that's zip recruiter dot com slash buck. M Papa Dadopoulos turns out gonna be giving his first televised interview tomorrow for those who just need a quick refresher. George papais It is a fun name to say. He is the former Trump foreign policy advisor who is facing some prison time because he

apparently lied to the Special Counsel Robert Mueller. My understandings he lied about a very trivial thing. Um, But this is gonna be his first on air interview tomorrow where Papadopolis will deal with the fact that he's been charged with lying to investigators. I'll let me say a few things about this. First of all, he's going on Jake Tapper Show. I am not a I'm not a Jake

Tapper fan, as those you listen this broadcast. No, I think that he's an enormous fraud and incredibly smug and sanctimonious and loves to He spends an inordinate amount of time talking about how much he he loves the troops. I'm like, why don't you just it shouldn't feel like a brand building exercise. Jake. You know, let's we we all love the troops. Calm calm down. But he's going to be doing this interview with Papadopolis. I have to assume.

I have to assume that it is because Papadopoulos wants a little bit of sympathy from the establishment, because see an end has been the pinnacle of Trump resistance really in the media. I mean, that's why I talked about seeing as much I do on the show, because they are the most aggressively anti Trump while still clinging to this fiction that they are not partisan, which is jue,

It's an it's an insult. That's you know, Wolf Blitzer and Anderson Cooper and Jake Tapper and and the rest of the crew over there pretending that they do not have an agenda, which is an anti Trump agenda is offensive. And the fact that they're so smug about it still And second, we're just doing journalism. I mean, Jim Acosta thinks he's still a journalist. This is offensive. But I

understand why Papadopolis would go on Top or show. It's because this is and this is the equivalent of the Michael Cohen interview with I think it was um, not Papadopolis, but Stephanopolis. Uh, that he was making essentially an act of contrition to the establishment to say, hey, guys, you know, I'm I'm not with Trump anymore. You know, please go easy on me. I'm you know, please give me a little bit of give me some leeway here. Let's let's

try to be friends sometime in the future or something. Right, He's essentially begging for forgiveness because, by the way, you know, he the reason that that he was um, the reason that they that he got nailed was a Papadopolis, they say, admitted to lying about his contact with Joseph miff Sued. I'm seeing here, uh. And so miff Sued was the guy who it looks like was run as a an

information gatherer, a source against the Trump campaign. So the fact that the FBI may have nailed Papadopoulos for lying about his contact with somebody that he only had contact with, because the FBI egregiously and in politicized fashion, ran this guy as a source against the Trump campaign just goes to show you how messed up this whole thing is.

I mean, folks, the whole mularpro First, I've really come to believe that most people outside of the Beltway and you know, the sort of coastal media people and those who are really into the political fight day in and day out, I think most people just don't really care. They just don't care that much about this anymore. They're they're sick of it. I'll be honestly, I'm kind of

sick of it. The only reason I stay on it is because one, I know, they're still hoping to use this against the president, right, They're still hoping to leverage this whole situation to damage President Trump, and too, I

want to know what really happened here. I mean, I I tweeted at President Trump today and I can tell you that, you know, while Trump doesn't necessarily interact with me, I I can reach members of the Trump family and people in the White House very easily, and and do when I when I choose to um with you know, I'm judicious about it obviously. Look, I mean there are

people the Trump White House. You've got people that are talking to folks at Fox News like every day, right, I Mean, there's there's a lot of connectivity with with the media. But I tweeted at Trump today, I said, look man, excuse me, I tweeted, Mr Presidents not look man, he's the President United States, Mr President, release the FISA, dux. I want to see what really happened here at the Carter page warrant and with anything involving Papadopoulos. We all,

we all deserve to see the truth here. Nobody in the UK is gonna No one's life is in danger if their name appears. That's the stuff. That's a lie, that's just bunk. It's a big pile of crap. So you know, I'm wondering what Papadopolis is gonna say. I am probably gonna have to watch some of Camper Jake Camper, Uh, so I'll have to watch some of of his interview, which does not throw me, but nonetheless I'll need to know what what Papadoppolis has to say. But this whole

thing is just ridiculous, it really is. I mean, anyone who I had, I'll tell you I had a big fight, uh recently with a friend of mine who also, like me, comes to the national security communities now on the outside, and she was she was all, oh, you know, don't don't you think don't you trust them buck, meaning the essentially the deep state, but the d o J, the FBI. Don't you trust them to know if Carter Page is a threat. And I'm like, no, I was in the

CIA's a rock office. I don't trust them to just get it right because they say so. No, I do not, And especially when you see some of these individal jewels who are are getting in trouble. I mean some of the people. I mean I mentioned before, you know McKay, then what's gonna happen there? There's been real misconduct at the d o J, n FBI. Mean, there have been people who have really stepped out a line and are now facing consequences because of it. And we should you know,

we should not forget about that. We shouldn't just brush that aside and act like it hasn't happened. It has happened. It's real, and it's because they hate Trump so much it so, you know, please do let me know by the way, you know, if you want, because some people all they do is covered this issue. And I and some people that I like in the media, but this is all they do. They cover Russia Gate. Uh, I

try to do a more varied program here. But if you want more Russia Gate, more of my thoughts as somebody who had a t S clearance worked with confidential well we didn't call them that. We call them other things, but work with you know, agents of the of the

federal government. And if you if you want me to to really drill into this more every day, but I just feel like we're in this world of of unreality in a sense, we're No matter how much it's shown that this Russia investigation is garbage, people still cling to it because they want to believe it because they're just

not handling Hillary's loss. Well, they have not been handling it. Well, uh, they take people take it personally that Hillary didn't win the election millions and millions of because liberals have replaced Here you go, I want to drop a little bomb at the end here, Liberals have replaced God with their politics. They have you know, the progressive left. I guess it's kind of reply repetitive, but the left has replaced God

with politics. That's why they can't handle these discussions. He's holding the line for America, buck Sexton his back as we try to evaluate what to do about the skewed social media platforms, the deep platforming movement among liberals, efforts

to shut down speech that they don't like. We have to deal with, uh, something that is in addition to the trend towards considering conservative ideology hate speech, right, which is you're going to see more of that, and trying to tie mainstream conservatives to people who are actually hateful, which you've already seen with a lot of efforts to say, oh, well, somebody who's a conservative was once at a meeting where there was once a person who once was at another

meeting where there was a white nationalist present, right, and then oh my gosh, this person can never be talked to ever again. You're like, wait, but they didn't, they didn't do anything. Um. There's also the problem of science, scientific study, and science becoming a form of of hate

speech according to the left. You know, I spoke to you recently about this study at at Brown University that was repudiated by Brown by the after it was published, Brown pulled it and repudiated it because that has to do with what I called what is called rather rapid onset gender dysphori Essentially, if a teenager who had it is usually the same sex the same sex attracted has a bunch of friends around him or her who come out as transgender, that person is much more likely to

also come out as transgender. That's damaging and problematic to the ideology of transgenderism and transgender rights. But it turns out there was an even bigger, uh, an even bigger issue in this. I was doing a little bit of research on this little bit of reading, and it was about something called trans dissistance, which was also which is also being studied by some scholars. And transdssistance is when

somebody uh ceases to view themselves as transgender. And in fact, when you study this, what you find is that, particularly among teenagers who identify as transgender at one point, the trans desistence numbers essentially not feeling transgender anymore is particularly is is noteworthy. I'll at least say that the numbers that they'll say it needs more study, but it's it's very real and it's there, um and I have to say it's it's astonishing how nasty and vitriolic people get

over this issue. But it's because this has become part of a of a social justice movement on the left. They've invested a lot of their political capital into this. And here's what happens if you if there's a recognition of rapid onset gender dysphoria or of transgender desistence. Essentially, people can just kind of decide because of their peer group to be transgender, and people can no longer feel transgender,

especially teenagers over a period of time. You know what that means, folks, that it is a psychological condition and that there is a component of time, sensitivity and choice involved with it. What that would indicate is that people are not It is not a fundamental, unchangeable part of somebody's critical identity that must be respected and cherished and and you know, held up for all to h to

proclaim as some kind of actualization. No, it's it's it may not be that, um And this is why, you know, and there's real medical reasoning behind this to be concerned at puberty blockers and hormone treatments can lead to permanent sterilization, So teenagers who think that they're a different gender, uh

can put themselves at serious health risk. There's been very little study on this, and doctors are now becoming complicit in it because they don't want the research to be done because anybody who does the research is called a hater, a bigott, hate speech. So once science is being called hate, we have entered into a very dark period, and you're

seeing it with this transgender rights issue. It's been going on for a while, but it's not becoming more clear because the science is not on the side of transgenderism as an innate and immovable characteristic of identity. It is much much more clear that it's a psychological condition, and the left doesn't want to hear that. So whenever someone says it, I'm gonna call them a hater, a bigot,

a transphobe. And there was also a news story just earlier this week that in the UK teachers are now being trained to identify transgender students at an early age. Why oh, of course, so that they can um, you know, be supportive of this concept. They can be supportive of transgenderism and transgender rights and on all the rest of it, that that gender dysphoria should really be nursed and and

uh be assisted along. There's a reason, folks that there's been recently a what is it a two thirty six surge in kids wanting sex changes in the past three years in the UK. It's because this has become a fad that is being forced on not just people in general, but on children. I think we should at least look at the science that's involved here before we come to all these judgments. We got roll call coming up. Stay with me, rock and roll, fellow patriots, we made ours

go up to eleven. It's time for roll Call. Facebook dot com slash buck Sex. And also you'll notice I'm posting more stuff. They're including a short video series we've started on Hill TV called buck Wild. I wanted to call it buck Shot, but there were some sensitivities about that, so it had to be called buck Wild. But buck Wild is pretty good. You should check it out Facebook dot com slash buck Sex, and please like and share, folks. Let me just tell you there's some progressives out there

who I work with, who are also posting videos. Who do you want to get more views? Because we tally them up every week. It's a left versus right battle to the finish. Uh. So you you guys are my my ace up to sleeve on this one, Team buck. I got a little special, little special legion to call upon here. Uh, Julie Rights, Hi, buck Love the show well Julie, you understand great radio, and you're a wonderful person, a fantastic taste. I'm just wondering a couple of things.

Isn't this anonymous op ed author complicit now in the tyranny of the Trump era? Is there a flow chart or maybe a family tree of people involved in the whole Russia thing. I think it would be a good idea for Senator Newz to put a new ness new ness I was corrected by him to put a PowerPoint presentation together to explain all the connections before the midterms. Your previous observation about my baby being adorable is correct. She has a photo here of herself and her baby. Uh.

He is the cutest baby ever. You had said. He looks like the Gerber baby. And actually his middle name is for my uncle who was an actual Gerber baby in the early nineteen forties. Thanks for the great analysis, Shields High, Julie. Uh well, Julie, he does he could be Your baby could sell out of baby food. I mean, I'm just gonna keep it real with you, tell it to you like it is, so you know, you might have you might have a little adorable little gold mine

there with your baby that could sell baby food. Uh, thank you so much for writing in as to the float chart of all the people involved. Yeah, I've actually been thinking about that. There's a part of me that kind of wants to go a beautiful mind on this whole thing and start without minus the crazy part, and create a big chart on the on the wall and and kind of connected all together and and show what's been going on here and and just how how crazy

this whole thing is. I mean, when when you start digging into it, the fact that we've spent as much time as we have and that the government spent the resources that it did to investigate Papadopoulis and Carter Page, they should be they should be ashamed. I mean, they

should be embarrassed. Carter Page is a nice guy, but is a threat to nobody and a threat to no one and and is and is actually a guy who speaks in glowing terms on people say oh buck, of course he will, but about America and went to the Naval Academy. Guy says he's a patriot. He just thinks that our policy toward Russia is not very smart. And there's a real used to be made about that, you know, this is not it's not about oh Trump and the dossier and all that other Uh so, yeah, it would

be helpful, Juliet. I wish I'd add that to the list of all the things I would do if I I had a little more time and a little more sanity these days. But the buck is is busy. Um. But thank you for reading, and Amy writes, read on air at your own risk. Oh okay, well I guess Amy,

I'm I'm taking the risk because we're in real time here. Uh. Reporter in Utah thinks that John Huntsman wrote the New York Times hit piece Possible Motive twenty twenty presidential run via a Utah reporter on Glenn Beck Live, not the show. The reporter used language analysis and Google found phrases in the piece most closely resemble John Huntsman. Um. Amy, I can tell you that I did see that earlier and Abby Huntsman, who was currently with the view. So there's that.

Abbie Huntsman has said definitively was not her father. And I know, I'll be a little bit. She's a sweetheart, actually, very nice lady. I don't think she would lie about that. You know, It's one thing if she were silent, but to come out and lie about it would strike me as a little unusual, um and and not smart. So that said, I don't know. You know, we're in a crazy world, folks. People that uh come at you with certainty on all these matters are certainly full of it.

So just remember that, Jen rights love you Buck, I love you to. Jen been cut. Catching up on episodes and the beginning of the August thirtie episode with all the monkey around comments have me dined with laughter. You should tweet that out about the Florida race. You know, I think it's gotten Glenn Glenn. Your Jen, not Glenn

Glenmon's my former boss. Jen, you are among many who feel like the monkeying around thing I just needed to be screamed from the rooftops because it was such a It was really just a step removed from what we saw earlier this week with Zena Bash, who was said to have a a white power hand signal that she had flashed, when really she just was resting her hand. I mean, can you imagine you show up? You spent your whole life being a and honest and and uh

and really first class professional in law. You're an advisor to Kavanaugh. You know you, You've got a husband, you've got children, You've never done anything, you know, anything to be ashamed of to anybody that anyone's aware of. And all of a sudden, you have Blue check reporters right around saying that you're flashing a secret white nationalist sign on TV. And your grandparents are Holocaust survivors from Poland you're half Jewish and half Mexican. By the way, Miss

Molly is half Jewish and half Mexican. Fun little side note, Um, could you but just think about how that would affect you? I mean, you went. I can imagine that Mrs bash went home to her kids that night, and and I had to hug him close and be like, what a crazy world we live in? Um? Adam writes, quote was from a few good Men shields. H Yes, Adam, you're correct.

Your action movie quote skills, although if you give men is not an action movie, it's a It's either a drama or a thriller, depending on which old school video rental story you're in, because they used to kind of mix those categories together. Um, but yes, you're correct. I did throw in a few good Men reference. Uh, Dan Buck love your show. Haven't heard an episode in at least a month. Whomp, whomp. Why please accept my apology. I'm not near a radio where I can listen privately.

How Laman excuses that, looking forward to some podcasts, maybe even today. Um, much of the time I get on public computers and get all nostalgic with the eighties and nineties supergroups and super talents as well as old sci fi. I'm sorry, Buck, I'm not having thoughts for litter to

your show. Um. Maybe a sign that nothing major is happening. Uh, touch off for now, Dan, Well, Dan, welcome back to the fold, my friend, and I appreciate you can spend time with this, or you spend time this when you can, as you can. Our buddy t J, who is a special place in our freedom hut heart because he has a shields high T shirt in his photo on Facebook, Folks,

that's dedication to the team. T J writes Buck. After watching you read a Trump tweet on Rising this morning, I've decided to make an executive decision for both Rising and your show podcast about Trump tweets. Officially, from now on, all Trump tweets must be read in Trump's voice. I demand it. Also, if you could throw in a few hand gesters, that'd be nice. That is all shields high t j I. I gotta be honest with you. I

gotta come clean on this one. I have not really developed a Trump impersonation, remember right, Obama store Obama on the shore something like us, because this was one of restoring Hey, we're talking on this cadence it was. And then when he was all that was when he was kind of in his rhythm. Then sometimes you do the but and he you know, he had a very almost a tick in the way that he would speak, and and he would always do this this end thing. Um. I do not have a of course, they've got burning

pretty soon. This is right here, and we have Governor Cuomo who is always up here. So you know, you've got some of these different characters. I don't have a Trump yet. And Trump is like a Trump for me is the political impersonation equivalent of a Scottish accent or or Australian accent, where people think they can do it because they've heard it, but then when they try it, they just sound like they're having some kind of a stroke, you know, like I put a shrimp on the Bobby Ors.

You know, they don't they don't know. Huh. I'm I'm Scottish. That's the only thing that most people could do with this guy. I'm Scottish. All right, Well, you gotta be able to say more than that. I Laddie, ay, laddie, I'm Scottish. That's about it. Yeah, this is like when I ask somebody, you know, when I start speaking Arabic, I can get a few sentences out and then I pretty much have to tap out. Uh. Yeah, I don't have a trump yet. I know it's a it's a deficiency.

I'm sorry. I feel like I've let some of you down with that. Um. I he's hard man. He's a very rich character. But his he you know, he doesn't really have an accent. He has a way of speaking, his word choice and hand gestures. I will say that, really, Alec Baldwin is one of the better trumpet personators i've seen. Alec Baldwin's very talented actor. He is, I mean, his politics are terrible, he's very talented actor. Um all right, next up here, ease Bob right listening to the last

night's podcast. Quote was from a few good men. Bob, you are correct my friend, you savor the flavor because well that's actually part of a quote. See if you get that one. Uh, Steady State versus Deep State. This is from Gregor. Hm hmm, sounds a bit familiar. Steady State is committed to continuing the struggle to liberate the parent land from the hands of the Trump drained the swamp aggressors Deep State. If you want to join the you've got to really hate Trump. Uh. Dedicated to continue

the struggle. I don't know, Gregor, you kind of lost me here man, but thank you, thank you anyway for stending in your note. I appreciate I couldn't real understand what's going on here. Um, that's gonna be a for today team. We gotta show Tomorrow we'll do a double role called the Boss. We're getting some of the ones that we had to skip over today. Prepare for early podcast next week. I really I'm gonna ask you all

for this one. All right, next week, all of you who listened to this radio show, even if you're gonna listen to Radio Live, subscribe to that podcast just so you have it, just so it's there and we can show that you know, we have the full digital reach of the team when we need it. I'm gonna drop

the first one Monday before lunchtime. It's it's gonna be think of it like a preview of the evening show, but you're getting it early, will get a full hour preview before we do the three hour radio show at night. So we're gonna podcast podcast first, if you will, and then three hours of the Freedom Hunt. That's that's the plan. That's what we got going on, So please join for that. I will see you tomorrow or talk to you tomorrow.

Shields High Team, Buck. It's an honor and a privilege to bring you my thoughts and all the things that matter to us as Americans every day. And your opinion matters a whole heck of a lot to me. You know. That's why I love roll call so much. It's also why I'm excited to tell you about a new social

media site, snippy dot com. If you're frustrated with the discourse on your social media page is if you're tired of the obvious shadow banning and left wing progressive nonsense that's going on in the conventional social media platforms, Snippy is what you need. Its founders have created a forum where people feel free to express their thoughts, frustrations, ideas, anything. You can write about what's on your mind, share photos,

strike up a conversation. All on snippy dot com enjoy freedom of ex Russian without suppression from left wing administrators. This is a place where discussion is valued, a place for your opinion matters. Snippy dot com is free to join, open to all, jump in, let your opinions be heard. No censorship, no agenda. Snippy dot com again. S n I P p y dot com