You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio act or wherever you get your podcasts. We've got to start with first principles on the border crisis. We've got to start with baseline concepts here, fundamental view of views of this country, what we're all about and what we're trying to accomplish, and what the rule of law actually means. Because what you'll find is that we're arguing about the details in
this country right now. We're arguing about the details, but we're not getting into difference in foundational separation in our political philosophy between the left and the right. There are all these people right now who think, oh, the Democrats want this crisis to stop. Two, the Democrats don't actually want people coming over the border one hundred thousand plus a month so that they can flood the immigration system, they can claim faulty asylum, they can stay, they're sending
their children there, enriching the cartels. Democrats don't don't want any of that, right, No, actually they do. And that's what people are just starting to see now. This is happening exactly as predicted and largely as planned. The problem that the Democrats have with all of this is that we're seeing it and it's happening faster than they anticipated. I want to explain this to you, but we've got to make this very clear. This is the border crisis the Democrats want, and they still see this as a
massive opportunity. And this is the kind of thing that if I keep saying this on social media, I'm sure I'll get censored. They'll probably start blocking my Twitter account doing all the things they've already done to me about COVID. Who, by the way, who is right on COVID lockdowns? I was the people that are citing the science they were wrong. Do you think that the social media sites care about that though? No. In fact, I'm on their radar. They now look to shut me down, and they're doing that
to you too. They have all your data, They see what you're saying, they see what you're up to, and they sell that, but they also use it for their own purposes. You think that your right to free speech is safe while megacorporations that are working hand in glove with the left want to try to silence you or maybe just change your mind without you even knowing it. You need to protect your privacy online. This is absolutely essential with Express VPN. Express vpn lets you anonymize much
of your online presence. It hides your IP address. That makes your activity much more difficult to trace and sell. The advertisers and Express vpn couldn't be easier to set up. I've got the app on my phone. I'm talking about sixty seconds. You got this thing good to go, and then you are protected. It encrypts one hundred percent of your data to make sure that hackers in internet, bad guys can't get at you. It's finally time to say no to censorship and take back your online privacy at
Express vpn dot com slash buck. Go to my special link right now and you'll get an extra three months free. That's Express vpn extra three months of service for free. Go to Express vpn dot com slash buck. That's Express vpn dot com slash buck. Democrats want this border crisis to continue. They just want to control it better. That's what you have to understand. We're in a different place here on this issue than they are. We are told the way the media talks about it. We just use
this word crisis. As we know Democrats view crises as opportunities, and this is yet another one for them. What is the downside of this for them? Well, it's happening too fast and they're overwhelming the facilities. When Democrats talk about trying to fix this, what are they saying, do you well, we've got to wait. They're telling people, don't come yet. That's the big claim. Meanwhile, much of the rest of
the country is saying, hold on a second. So we have an open border right now, right and if anybody says no, we don't. If you show up right now on foot at the US Mexico border as if for a national you flag down to patrol and you say, I have a credible fear of persecution in my home country,
and that's really all you have to say. There's an overwhelmingly high chance that you will be processed and then released in the US interior with a pending court date, that you're they're never going to track you down and kick you out of the country and deport you even
if you don't show up for your hearing. It's the chance of that happening is probably, you know, less than ten, less than five percent, So your odds are really good and if you come back with the way the Biden administration is enforcing the law right now or not enforcing it. Even if you're a repeat offender for a legal crossing,
you aren't penalized in any significant fashion. So we have an ongoing immigration debacle at the US Mexico border, but our political parties have two entirely different views of what
makes it a problem. I mean, if you believe in American sovereignty and the rule of law, the crisis is simply that we have a day facto open order that's over one hundred thousand illegal aliens a month now flooding in the United States because they know the Democrats will let them stay and want to give them amnesty, and more coming every day. I mean, our immigration system looks like a big joke right now if you're the Biden
White House. On the other hand, the problem at the border is there are so many illegals crossing into the US that they can't be processed fast enough. Detention facilities for unaccompanied miners. I'm not talking about kids in cages here, right, because that's only when Trump is an office. No, they're
detention facilities for unaccompanied miners. They're overflowing. The American people are figuring out what's going on here because the wave of illegal immigration is so heavy, is so extreme that it's Alinsky style overwhelming the processing of those of those migrants in the United States. So that's what they view as the real problem. The Biden administrations talk about a humane immigration policy was really just a giant invitation to illegals from all over the world to game the process
and skip to the front of the line. That's now a political problem for Democrats who are hoping that a coalition of leftist corporatis and GLP establishment elites are going to be able to ram through amnesty before the American people realize that the electoral map is being transformed. It's where everyone has to realize that the Biden, Democrats and the rest of the country aren't on the same page.
When DHS Secretary Majorca says, do not take the journey now, give us time to build an orderly, safe way in the United States, he's giving away the game. That's the whole problem they have. They want bigger facilities, more facilities, more personnel to feed clothed, give medicine two and give housing two. An endless influx of illegal immigrants, and they're not just from Central America. They're from all over the world. If you can get to Mexico right now, you can
gain entry into the United States. That's the way it works. If you can get to Mexico, you can walk into the US. You may be detained for a few days, but you're going to be fed and taken care of and clothed, and they'll give you medical care and everything else, and then you'll be released. Often they're just releasing migrants at bus stops or they just say, you know, here you go. You're on your own. But there's a court date that's going to come up in about two years.
Be sure you show up at it. Do you think that's really going to happen By the time that court date even comes up? What do you think the chances are the world have some form of amnesty in place. See, this is the fundamental problem. The Democrats aren't upset about foreigners flooding into America. They love that as long as they provide reliable votes. What bothers Joe Biden and his handlers is that the facilities meant to process these illegals
are bursting at the seams. The optics of the overflowing detention areas are so poor that Americans are starting to say, what the heck is going on down there? What we're seeing at the government is actually a collision of seeing at the border, rather as a collision of fundamentally different views of America's future. Conservatives believe that immigration laws must be respected and enforced, which means stopping the flow of illegals. The Biden administration, on the other hand, has no interest
in stopping illegal crossings. On the contrary, it's trying to kick the door wide open in preparation for an amnesty that will end the GOP as a political force forever. Those are the stakes here. We can all see how this is playing out. We can all see what's happening. Biden isn't trying to end the current avalanche of illegal entry. He just wants to control the flow, don't you see. Slow it down, guys, let's get let's get it down a little bit. You can still come in, you can
still claim phony asylum. You can still have a giant backdoor entry into the United States. And remember this is a program that was set up. The asylum program is meant for people who are truly fleeing political persecution and the possibility of death if they stay in their home countries. Is is that what we're seeing. No, overwhelmingly, what we see are people who just want to come to America.
It's better here than in their home country. They have better economic prospects, and they recognize that this is an easy way to do it. All those people, and I know a lot of them, listen to this show, right, all those legal immigrants who have joined the American family with full respect for our laws and are such a critical part of what makes us America. They've got to be looking at this and saying, well, I guess I
could have just shown up and stayed. All those years of doing things the right way, and all those years of paying the taxes I was supposed to pay, sometimes paying immigration attorneys and going through the you know, the naturalization process, or going through first visas and then citizenship
and all all the things that come up. Or you could have just waited for a Biden administration, for a Democrat left wing open borders frenzy, and just showed up and said, uh, yeah, here I am, I'm gonna stay. I like it better here now. If you as an American tried to do this in Europe, by the way, you'd be told that's funny, you're on the next plane home. Other countries are allowed to have borders, Other countries are allowed to establish sovereignty over who comes and goes. We
are not. It's racist to have borders. That's that's what we've turned into as a country. It's racist to have borders, according to the left. So all these other countries all over the world are somehow not racist for enforcing their borders. But America, that's that's all it is. We take a million people a year in the United States through the
legal immigration process. But if you have a problem with taking another million illegally, or half a million, or whatever the number is going to be this year, you're a bigot. You're a bigot. Why do we even have an immigration system. We have to ask these fundamental questions. Why have an immigration system? If illegal immigration isn't a problem, if assimilation isn't a real thing, if merit based immigration is a joke, if all these things are just lies that the right
has been telling Americans for oh, I don't know generations. Now, if that's all true, then why not just come out and say a Democrats, anybody who wants to come gets to come, and you can leave when you want to leave too. I wonder how that's going to work. This is the America that they are setting up, but they
don't care. What they care about is that there are many millions and we always get into these debates about how many millions, many millions of illegal immigrant in the United States who are just waiting to be legalized and they will be given the right to vote. And Democrats know that once they're legalized, then the next step I'm giving them citizenship and voting rights. I'm not gonna understand the way of that. You're kidding me. That's the whole point.
That's why Democrats want to do this, and Republicans sit around arguing about nonsense. Republicans think that if we can hold the marginal tax rate on individual income down two or three percent, that's a big victory. Democrats are trying to change the game, and they are an open borders party in all but name. They want any foreigner who comes into America through whatever illegal or dishonest means to stay because it solidifies their power. Wake up, America, Your
country hangs in the balance. He has suspended construction of the border wall, jeopardizing our national security. He's embraced he halted most deportations, he cut domestic immigration arrest by sixty
and dismantled the migrant protection protocols. This administration through our existing immigration law out the window and let the world know that when it comes to illegal entry, not only will we look the other way, this administration is encouraging them to come Centor Blackburn's right, in every way, they have made it harder to enforce immigration law. They have
taken every opportunity. The Democrats, the Biden administration have made it so that the chances of access and staying through illegal means is as high as it can be without just disbanding border patrol. Disbanding Remember, they wanted to abolish ice. That was the that was the rallying cry from a see under the Trump administration, it was kids in cages, which apparently they're back in the cages and abolish ice.
But that was too honest. The Democrats have this recurring problem where they can't tell the American people overall what they're really going to do. They give some talking points version of it that doesn't sound quite as radical and then behind the scenes, the actual decisions they make and the policies they push are going toward the radical goal. And that's a perfect description of what Joe Biden's role in all of this is. Joe Biden is the doddering
old fool who just shuffles around. Good, I'm here, you know, to tell you the things, and maybe I'll do a press conference in a couple of weeks. And meanwhile, the Obama administration officials around him and the DNC apparatus around him is making all the actual decisions. I mean, there's all these editorials you see today. I mean, the border
Cristi is the big story in the country. And I've got a piece on bucksexton dot com and I hope you will go read, go check it out on this where I just make the case to you very clearly about how Democrats don't want this to end. They just want to control the flow better, the flow of illegal immigrants. Remember, when you cross in the United States illegally, that is an illegal act, hence the term they are not cross
again ports of entry. They are breaking US law in preparation to break US law again when they don't show up for their asylum hearings, or when they show up for their asylum hearings don't get it, but then don't show up for their deportation hearing, which is actually a different thing. Think about that. The problem here is one of cause and effect, and the Democrats don't want to admit it. When you make it really appealing to people to come into United States illegally, they will do it.
There is a magnet, there is an enticement here, and the Democrat response to this is to actually make it more appealing. Hey, let's make sure we have great facilities, really comfortable, everyone moves through super fast. I mean, the government doesn't even do this for people that are showing up at the DMV. But we're gonna do this. We're gonna make it as seamless and painless and easy as possible to illegally enter the United States under the Biden administration.
That's their approach. This is what they're saying. You know, how you get illegal immigration to stop. You make it so that there's not a benefit to coming to the United States illegally. That's the only way. Now. Look, if people want to make an argument, if the Democrats want to say, you know what we actually do we do just want to legal immigrately. Anybody wants to come should
be able to come. Then change the immigration laws. Have elected officials actually make that the law, and then we could hold them accountable for that, but at least it will be within the process. What they do is lawlessness. It's encouraging on the one hand, what they pretend to be slowing down or stopping on the other. This is because ultimately they benefit from this. They're playing a double game here. But they don't want this to stop. They don't want it to stop. They don't want to call
it a crisis because of the optics. But really it's just they didn't realize how appealing it was going to be to illegal immigrant this quickly to come into the United States on the bide administration. Why don't they tell us how many people are being sent back? Notice the lack of transparency around all of this. Why don't they tell us what the percentage is of people who show up at the border right now and are immediately told to turn around. You are not allowed entry in the
United States. I mean, I don't think I could even go to Canada right now as an American. They turn me away. But if you show up at our southern border as a It's not just Central Americans, people from Pakistan, people from China, people from you know, anywhere, Romania, who knows. They really are showing up from dozens of countries all over the world. You show up at our southern border, you are as long as the cartels are part of
the human trafficking of these individuals. They coach them on what to say, they bring them right to the border, and they have a giant open door that they walk through. If you want this to stop, you have to enforce the lawnmark. Why is Interior enforcement way down? Why did Biden call for a moratorium on deportations for one hundred days? Think about that he comes in office, is we're not
going to deport anybody for one hundred days. That sounds like an administration that's preparing a grand amnesty, doesn't it What was wrong with those deportations. In fact, they're trying to undo some of the deportations that were done during the Trump years. But they tell us the system is broken. They tell us that they inherited That's my favorite. They inherited a broken system. And the reality is that people just listen to what the Democrats say, here's the border coordinator.
It's not a good job to have these days. ROBERTA. Jacobson played twenty one. The Mexican president said the other day, of the migrants, they see President Biden as the migrant president. How do you respond to that? Well, I think what President Lopez Obrador is reflecting is the fact that President Biden came into office with a much more humane message, with a message that we were going to enforce our
laws but also have a humane migration system. And I think what he means is that we are going to treat people fairly, we are going to reform our immigration system. And so while I understand what he was saying, I think that it's it's not the way we would put it. It is a more humane system, but it is not open borders, and it is not the fact we're going to enforce our law. This is a this is all double speak humane, more humane, What does that mean? Yeah,
of course, we don't want to treat anybody poorly. These aren't bad people. They're not you know, they're overwhelmingly you know, ninety nine out of one hundred of them are not actually a violent criminal threat of any kind. So, but what does it mean to treat them humanely? Does that mean they get to stay? I mean, I really ask Yeah, of course, humanely means you give them food, in medicine,
you take care of people. We're taking people into custody, just like you would if you were a prisoner anywhere else the US. You have to be given you have to be given the support of the state if you're in the custody of the state. But does humane mean they get to stay? Because if that's the case, then
it is an open border. So this is the part of it that they won't answer because this goes to a fundamental lie the Democrats have told the American people, which is that they are not an open borders party. They are, they're just not quite there yet. A lot of the migrants coming in saying they're coming in because you promised to make things better. It seems to be getting worse by the day. Was it a mistake not
to anticipate this surge? Well, first of all, there was a surge in the last two years, and nineteen and twenty there was a surge as well. This one might be worse. No, well it could be. But here's the deal we're sending back people to first of all, the idea that Joe Biden said, come because I heard the other day that they're coming. Because you know, I'm a nice guy and I won't get strain this. Yeah, well here's the deal. They're not do you have to say
quite clearly, don't come. Yes, I can say quite clearly, don't come on when we're in the process of getting set up. Don't leave your town, our city or community. Don't come while we're in the process of setting up. What is that? What do you mean, Well, hold on a second, Why is it just don't come? What you're
doing is not is not within our immigration laws. If you want to go within immigration laws, there's a whole system that people go through and you you know, you you go to uh the you you know, you US consulate and you apply for a visa or you go and you you show up at a port of entry and there's all this paperwork and we can we can talk about how it's byzantine and it's crazy and it shouldn't happen this way or whatever that it should be.
You know that that process could be better and more streamlined. However, that's not what they're saying. They're saying, hold on, let's get ready so that you can keep doing this. The problem that Biden has with what's happening at the southern border is not that people are gaming the immigration system in huge numbers to make our legal immigration system a joke. The problem he has is that the facilities for people are bursting and we're hitting record numbers. And it's all
because there's a Democrat in office. And we all know it. We know the Democrat Party has become We all remember when Joe Biden was among them, when they when they held their hands up on stage during the presidential debates or in the primary and they said they wanted to get free healthcare to illegal aliens. So you don't even have to be in the country legally, and the taxpayers
are going to pay for your healthcare. Not emergency, not if somebody comes in with, you know, a gunshot wound in the shoulder, because we are a kind of decent people, and of course we're gonna save someone's life, but all of your healthcare, I mean, you know, your healthcare for life, and we're going to make sure that you get everything that you need. And that was the Democrat position, which
is just remarkable. Because a lot of people work very hard to try to pay their healthcare premiums, work very hard to try to make the money to be productive enough to provide healthcare for their families. But if you show up illegally, now, the Democrats just want to give
you healthcare. And you might say, oh, well that maybe it will be something like Medicaid, so it won't be the same healthcare that you used to do in the private sector, right, and then they'll complain that it's not good enough healthcare, so they'll want to give them the
same healthcare. Everyone should get the same healthcare. Right. That's what we're actually heading toward with the Democrat Party, as you know, that does not have let does not have the end result that they like to pretend it does, really long wait times, rationing. We're going to have that healthcare discussion in this country too. But but back to immigration.
Biden administration that's been in office what two months, and they're already i mean, they're already cornered on this as a messaging issue that they don't have anything to say about this that that makes any sense. I mean, all they do is essentially run around pretending like we can't actually see what we see. I mean, here's Jensaki play three. First, let me say that, like COVID, obviously different issue, but
we recognize this is a big problem. The last administration left us a dismantled, an unworkable system, and like any other problem, we are going to do everything we can to solve it. So our focus here is on solutions. Let me just walk you through a couple of the steps, and we've done this a little bit, but there's always,
of course, to developments on considerations that are underway. Yeah, the solutions that don't involve telling people they can't actually come into the American interior who crossed into the US illegally aren't solutions. The way that the way that you stop illegal immigration, and this really has to be said, and Democrats at some level, I think know this, but they pretend not to. The way you stop illegal immigration is to stop illegal immigration. You have to stop people
from doing this or else it continues. You can talk about it, you can say you want to work on the crisis, you want to do this, that and the other thing, But ultimately it comes down to do they believe do the people coming believe that they have a very good shot of being able to stay. And therefore this is a very valuable thing, being able to be in America and this world we live in. This is an incredible country. For all of its flaws, all of its problems. We are very wealthy. We still have some
freedom left. I mean, it's been the worst year for freedom, the worst twelve month period for American freedom in my lifetime. But we still have some freedom left. And we have to actually preserve the rule of law here. You know, the rule of law is largely a perception driven phenomenon.
Even Orwell wrote about this back in the nineteen thirties and nineteen forties that one thing that was amazing about an Englishman is that no matter what part of society you found an Englishman in, no matter what socioeconomics strata they fell into, they had this notion, this concept of the law, and that the law made things right and wrong.
It wasn't perfect, it didn't mean that there weren't people that got away with things, but there was an overarching idea of the law as something that is binding upon all of us and that at some level also holds us together as a people. Lawlessness erodes that I've been telling you and I know that there will be people that would push this aside and say that it's sillier,
it's nonsense. I mean, I'm going to spend a lot of hours figuring out how much of my money the government is going to take from me this year, and if I don't do it, there is a real chance that men with firearms paid by the state will show up, take away my freedom, take me into court, and lock me up in a cell. Now, my little pitiful contribution to the federal treasury doesn't really matter. But they'll tell you it's because of the rule of law. It's because
everybody has to abide by these rules. Now we can have a whole other discussion about whether the income taxes it's something that should exist. But nonetheless, if we want all the goodies we have from the government too, we are going to have to pay for them. This is the problem, and people have decided they really want the goodies.
But if you come to the country illegally, if you trespass on us sovereign territory as a foreign national without permission to be here, now you aren't a problem, and you certainly should not be punished. You're actually a victim. This is the way the left is framing this, the people who are coming here illegally, they're a victim of US xenophobia. They're a victim of our insufficient immigration system.
It's our fault, you see, that they come here illegally because we haven't made it easy enough for them to come legally, Which then also raises the question how many people should we take into this country legally every year? We already do about a million? Five million? Does that sound about right? Ten million? At some point does that start to change the nature and character of the American people in the American polity? Do we cease to be a country if we have a foreign born population that
exceeds forty fifty percent? Now, I know we're not there yet, We're not near there, but the country is shifting very rapidly toward an open border stance. What does this look like in ten years? What does this look like in fifty years? Most of the rest of the world is very comfortable with the state being in much greater control than the American ethos allows for right now, although in the year of COVID, I think that's become more debatable than it has been previously. But this is really about
what America is going to be going forward. And the Democrats are very dug in on this because ultimately, for them, the prize at the end of this is they create a one party state in America. That is the ultimate prize that they are going for. And they'll figure the rest out. What does that mean for this country, what does it look like for this country? That none of
that matters. They'll figure the rest out. They just want to be in charge and a political party that believes in rule of law, sovereignty, secure borders, and constitutional protection of individual rights. It's going to be on if the open border stays open long enough, it's not broken and it doesn't need to be fixed. Our Democratic friends used the filibuster frequently in the last Congress they were in the minority in the Senate. It took advantage of, for example,
killing Senator Tim Scott's police reform bill. I didn't react to that by saying, Okay, we'll change the rules of the Senate to get our way. Filibuster reform. Filibuster reform, that's what they're really gonna go with. I mean, you almost have to respect the brazenness that just this year, unbelievable dishonesty of the Democrats here. There is a system that we have and it has been around for quite some time, and the bilibuster has been in the Senate
for quite some time. Democrats were willing to use it, and Republicans did not run rough shot over them. They stayed within this. I know it's a tradition of the Senate. It's not in the Constitution. I understand it's a rule of the Senate, but those rules can change. Just remember this. It was the Democrats that went with the nuclear option
on judges. It was Harry Reid and the Democrats who decided that Senate tradition would have to give way because the Democrats wanted something really badly, and they wanted to do something badly enough that it didn't matter that this
would have eventual blowback. It didn't matter that there would come a time when the shoe would be on the other foot and the Republican party would actually be in charge and be calling the shots, and they would remember what the Democrats did, they would remember how unwilling to compromise they were. And sure enough, this has resulted in a lot of federal judges and even Supreme Court justices
getting confirmed by Republicans in latter years after Harry Reid. Remember, they pulled the trigger on the nuclear option first, because Democrats are powermad status and this is what they do, right. They they think that there's a righteousness, there's a religious fervor in their government policies and plans, and whatever they have to do to get it done, they'll do. And that's what they did. They pulled the trigger on the nuclear weapons, so to speak, of eliminating the filibuster for
judicial nominees. And now we're just at the precipice of them doing it this time around for any legislation that they want. And I think the real question for them, I think, I think the real challenge for them is which bill to choose to ram through with it first. You know, you've seen how they act here. You've seen how they use they use the lay of COVID AID to create a trojan horse effect for all their other spending. Right, Oh, you know here, it's just it's just COVID relief. It's
it's saving America. It's COVID relief. Well, no, it's payoffs for Democrat controlled cities. And oh, I can't even begin to cover all the different money. Nine nine percent of the one point nine trillion dollars goes to actual vaccines and COVID fighting, and the rest of it is money that Democrats just wanted to spend on things. And they say they might do another one. Now they're talking about a trillion dollar infrastructure package and they want to raise taxes.
I mean, they learn nothing here. I mean they just they're they're gonna take our economy and they're gonna slow it down, and they're gonna they're gonna strangle it like a little authoritarian boa constrictor just with the coils getting tighter around the economy's neck all the time. And they're gonna say it's Trump's fault, of course, because they're irresponsible. I mean, being reckless and unaccountable is a long long time Democrat passtime. So they get rid of the filibuster
for what. That's the big outstanding question. Now, that's the issue that I think everybody needs to look at it and understand is at the forefront right now. They might do it. They could do it for HR one, but I don't think that's the way to go. They want to do it for something where they view their position as essentially unassailable from a PR standpoint, the optics right, from a PR standpoint. They can probably do it on
immigration and say it was necessary for humanitarian reasons. We had to give an amnesty for humanitarian reasons, for a decency called for us to eliminate the filibuster. Of course, and as I've been telling you, if they do this, and I think that there's a chance they will, now maybe you believe Joe Manchin and Kristen Cinema and some of the others will hold the line against this, but think of the pressure the Democrats will bring to bear on them. Think of the ways that they will make
this more challenging. Right, and you can you can be a hero. You can be a hero to Democrats and get book deals and be loved forever and be celebrated on MSNBC by going along with the filibuster reform, which, as we know, it's just the nuclear option once again. Another this is you know, we're going from like the you know, the fat Boy bombs and now more more advanced thermonuclear devices right now we're getting into ICBMs, the nuclear option hit once again. They they will make this pitch,
you know, and even to someone like Joe. It's it's gonna be tough. Democrats have a lot of inducements. It's fun to be on the democrats side. I mean my friends who are Democrats. Man, it's great. You get to be with all the cool people. You get to have all the media on your side. Basically all the corporations are with you. You know everything, it's it's it's great
or I don't know. If only I could just negate who I am and what I know to be true, it would be so much fun to switch teams, right, It'd be so much fun if I could be that kind of turn coat. Now there are people who do it, but I wouldn't be able to sleep at night. And I think that's pretty important. But if they do it on immigration, the story will be Democrats brought millions of people out of the shadows into being in a part of our American family, and it was necessary to get
rid of this procedural obstruction. Obstructionism is, of course a term you hear so much more frequently now, right, the edual obstruction of the filibuster. It was when Democrats are in the minority. The filibuster is in essential, essential bulwark against majoritary and tyranny. When Democrats are in the majority, the filibuster is stopping you know, the filibuster when the Senate is stopping the US government from feeding babies and
saving people. And you know that's we all see the difference. We all know how this works. We understand the way this breaks down. Will they It's really I don't think it's a question of do they want to do it? It's can they get the votes to do it? Can they get the votes to then with a fifty fifty Senate tie and Kamala breaking the tie past legislation that will change America forever and will put the Republican Party
on a pathway to complete irrelevancy and political insolvency. I think when they have that opportunit unity, they're going to find a way to do it. I know that you received the vaccine, Missus Trump also got the vaccine. Would you recommend to our audience that they get the vaccine?
Then I would recommend it, and I would recommend it to a lot of people that don't want to get it, and a lot of those people voted for me, frankly, But you know, again, we have our freedoms and we have to live by that, and I agree with that also. But it's a great vaccine. It's a safe vaccine, and it's something that works, and we've been well working round the clock. And what I got the FDA to do,
this would have happened. This would have happened in many, many years from now if we didn't if I didn't get involved, and if we didn't get involved. Now, this is the president who is saying what Democrats have been saying. The President wouldn't say, and therefore he's still to blame for vaccine hesitancy, even though he got the vaccine. He's saying on national TV, yes, I recommend you get the vaccine, and the Democrats are still going to find a way
to blame Trump for vaccine hesitancy. When if you recall, and I'm not going to let this go, if you recall, in the previous the previous administration, while Trump was still in office, you had Kamala Harris and Joe Biden both when they were on the campaign trail raising doubts about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine because it was Trump's FDA. Remember that it was Trump's FDA. Therefore you can't trust it can't trust. It not allowed, and that
was reckless. That was wrong, and that should be something that people always remember because now you're getting these lectures from Democrats who wanted you the vaccine is something that Joe Biden is responsible for. It. It's as though Joe Biden were, you know, in his lab coat looking at slide. It's under a microscope. I guess it would have to be a very specialized microscope, if you know what I mean, trying to figure out how to do this. No and
Joe Biden. I mean, the more I see this guy just just taking a break for a moment from the vaccine talk, the more I see Joe Biden shuffle around on camera and everything, it is unbelievable that this guy is the president of the United States. You know, there was something surreal. See I'm honest about this. There was something surreal about Trump being president because you'd say, oh my gosh, the guy from the this is like out
of a movie, the guy from a celebrity apprentice. I mean it, you know, he was a celebrity who became the president. So there was a part of my brand that said this is kind of this is kind of funny or this is kind of crazy or whatever. But Trump wouldn't move around. You'd say, this guy's this guy's on it. You know, this guy's got a command presence. This guy has a persona is just full of energy and vitality. I mean, Joe Biden is walking around and
you see him go up to the microphones occasionally. I mean the most recent time, we had a press spray or the pool spray or whatever they call it in the White House Press Corp where they you know, they get a group of a gaggle of reporters together to ask him one or two questions, usually like you know, what do you think of the weather, President Biden? You go to bir it's little. It's a little bit cool, but a little bit not that cool. You know. Joe
Biden's a genius. Joe Biden is amazing. I also saw this anecdote that he said that he looked into Putin's soul when he met with him and looked at him and said, you know, you don't have a soul, and Putin said, I think we understand each other. Joe Biden's light. I mean, Joe Biden really is that guy who tells you a story to impress you. And your first thought as soon as he's done is that's ridiculous, you're lying to me. That's who Joe Biden is. The guy can't
help it. This is who he is. So he's always been. He's just kind of a kind of a slimy sales men for bideness. And I mean when this guy shuffles around and you see him and he just he looks weak and fatigued and not up for this, and he sounds I mean the whole thing. The guy's almost eighty years old, folks. And I love the eighty year olds who are listening to this. God bless you and thank you. But I don't think, you know, people at that age
should be president. You know, they should be you know, revered, you know, elder members of our families and our lives, and you know, but president at eighty really, it's it's unbelievable. And we all we see some early signs. And when we say declined, I'm not trying to diagnose him with
any you know, specific illness or anything like that. I know people walk around and they say, anyone who's been around somebody who's had Alzheimer's as I have, knows that it's it's just it's heartbreaking, and it's the most it's the most serious kind of thing. So I really try to stay away from those, you know, I don't like when people start making taking cheap shots like that. You know, even if you think that Biden, when I say he's in cognitive decline, I just mean he's not as sharp
as he used to be. The guy's old and he's fading, which happens to all of us. That is going to happen to everybody when they get up around that age, and we can all see it, but we're not supposed to see it. I mean, this is the most incredible emperor has no closed situation imaginable. And not only that, I mean the Democrats walk around doing what is what is aptly described by even by the left wing journalist Matt Taiebi as Soviet style propaganda. I mean it's embarrassing,
it's embarrassing. But Taiebe actually actually wrote this about Biden. I mean, he wrote a piece in the National Interest and it's it's x um and and this guy's a leftist. I mean he hated Bush, he hated um. He called the Soviet sovietization of the American press. And one of the best parts of his whole analysis here is that he says they can't even get comedians to make fun of Joe Biden. The comedians, this guy is a bumbling
buffoon who walks around is like a gas factory. Okay, it's like mister Magoo is the president of the United States, and the and the American press, I mean American comedians now, places like Saturday Night Live were walking around saying, oh, we we can't find anything to make fun of Joe Biden on really the ancient guy who sniffs strang women's heads when he doesn't even know them and walks around saying things that, you know, it's like clean up on
Aisle five every once in a while, and Biden just says, you know, calls one a dog faced pony soldier squirer. That guy. You can't find a way to make fun of him. I mean, I just wish Democrats would live in the real world for five minutes here. Stop believing this fantasy that is being foisted upon you by CNN and the New York Times and Hollywood and Google and Facebook and Twitter. They're lying to you about this guy.
Joe Biden is a clown and a joke, and until until a moment ago, Democrats recognize that even the Democrats knew this guy was always third string. And now he's president and we're all supposed to clap. I mean, do you remember when a few months ago Biden won the election. People were dancing in the streets because he was gonna
do such great things for America. Yeah, hilarious. Open up the border, raised taxes, make sure that biological males can compete in women's sports, shut down the Keystone XEL pipeline. Bow to Iran. Yeah, let's go back to the bowing. Foreign policy, remember that bow down beg forgiveness for all of america sins. Other countries don't do this, but we
should do this because we're so bad. Because the people that claim that America so bad, who were in charge of it, by destroying that commonality, by destroying that common history, create the grounds for reforming America in the image that they see fit. First, they have to wipe away. This is what in revolutions happens all the time. I mean, you go back to the French Revolution. There's a reason
that they were changing the language. There's a reason they came up with a new calendar, and they tried to replace religion with a church of reason. What does this all sound like? I mean, you can draw this thread of ideological, ideological and ethical similarity from the French Revolution, through the Soviet Revolution nineteen seventeen, all the way through to democrats in their ideology and their claims today. Oh, it's at speaking about this. I mentioned this piece on Taiebie.
I'm sorry this piece that Taiebe wrote. Who again might even be horrified that somebody as right wing as me is giving him a shout out on their national radio show. But it's a very good piece. Here's here's one thing he says. This is about the making fun of Joe Biden. Part of this, the most Soviet of the recent efforts, didn't have a classically Soviet headline. He writes. Comedians are
struggling to parody Biden. Let's hope it doesn't last. This was a Washington Post opinion piece by Richard Zoglin arguing that Biden is the first president in generations who might be impervious to impressionists. Zoglin contended Biden is impregnable to parody, too devoid of obvious quirks. Two muted and self effacing in his manner to offer comedians much to work with. I mean, you've got to be you've got to be
kidding me, right. This this is the guy who here you go, This is the guy who who says all kinds of things. Why why you take it in? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why you're getting nervous? Man? And Cornpop was a bad dude and he ran a bunch of bad boys. I'm not center. I don't like it. Let him go, Let'll go. The reason why I'm run is because I've been around a long time and I have no more than most people's house, and I hadn't get things done. That's why I'm running. And you want to check my shape on?
Let's do push us together, man, let's do this. Let mendel caucus. No you haven't. You're a lion, dog faced pony soldier. You said you are. Make sure the television excuse me, make sure you have the record player on at night, the phone and show he's up on the board, would list him. I said, hey, Esther, you off the board. I'll come up and drag you off. We all these truths to be self evident. Oh man, I'm a creative
by go you know the you know the thing. Poor kids are just as bright and just as twn as white kids. I'm beginning to see why your wife left you. And he cut off a six foot and left the chain. He fulled up. He said, you walk out with that chain, and you walked to the car and say you may cut me, man, but I'm gonna wrap this chain around your head. If you agree with me, go to Joe three O three three oh and help me in this fight. Yeah.
No jokes to be made about that guy, totally totally squared away, nothing to say about him other than what a genius he is. This is the American media today, and it is the sovietization of the American press. It's embarrassing. It's embarrassing, Tybee writes reality and Soviet news because the guy actually spent type, spent a lot of time in Russia and actually knows this country was one hundred percent binary, with all the people either heroes or villains. Ninety five
percent of most issues of Pravda or Izvestia. We're just names of party leaders surrounded by a list of applause words like fullhearted, wise, mighty, and courageous, and then he gives you. Some of the headlines in the US press lately sounds suspiciously like this kind of work. Biden's historic victory for America, Biden's stimulus showers money on American sharply cutting poverty. That was okay, end quote there. That was from the Washington Post. That's not a DNC press release.
We're not supposed to notice. And this is liberal leftism today is a is the demand that you not notice. You were not allowed to see things as they are. You're not allowed to notice things. Oh, that's what's happening there. Oh, that's what that person's doing it. Shut up. Here's the allowable narrative. And if you don't go along with it, we'll get you fired from your job, we'll shut you off from the major communications platforms, will ruin your reputation,
and we'll destroy your life. You are not allowed to notice things. Do you see any chance that maybe that guidance changes between now in the summer where you say, okay, everyone is vaccinated, the trends are looking good. We're going to open it up beyond small gatherings by the fourth of July. You know, that's entirely conceivable and possible that
that was happening. What the President was saying is that we traditionally have at the fourth of July, the kind of barbecue in the backyard, the kind of things that we treasure as Americans as part of our tradition. He was saying, we're going to have that if we do all the things that he mentioned, if we go beyond that, because we have such a low level of infection, all the better for it. I don't believe he's ruling that out. He's saying, this is at least what we're going to
be able to do by the fourth of July. And I think it's a quite reasonable trajection. I think Fauci is a quite delusional weirdo. That's what I think. I think Fauci needs to retire. Somebody explained this to me. So somebody explained this to me. I'm really curious because all all you have to know about doctor Fauci, in my opinion, is that with all of his reversals and his wrong proclamations, he has not upset the lockdown left
one time, not once. How is that possible. How is it possible that, at no stage during this pandemic that and not a single place you know, whether it was on the school's question, or masks or double masks, or lockdown duration or indoor dining outdoor dining. I have never seen the Democrat consentists in the media or the Democrat Party turn on Fauci for a single day. How is
that possible? He hasn't upset them once, not a single time he had to say to them, you know, hey, guys, turns out that, you know, shutting down schools for in person learning is actually a stupid and kind of cowardly thing to do. No, never, never, that's because he's a little leftist bureaucrat. That's why. That is the reality. And sure enough, what we see here is him continuing to be in this role. I'm gonna tell you something right now.
We may have wintertime COVID in twenty twenty one, So we either decide that enough is enough or we continue to have our lives up ended by this feckless little bureaucrat. That those are the choices, And I don't know what it's going to take to get us we either have. I thought we would get to mass civil disobedience from this idiocy much sooner than we have, and maybe still
people because they're so frightened. Everyone's been so scared. I mean, if you're if you're under fifty and you have a functioning immune system, really, if you're under sixty and you have a functioning immune system. And I'm just gonna say this, and I do not say this to be unkind at all. Look, I've put on a lot of weight during the pandemic. I know what it's like. But also weight is a
very serious risk factor for all this do. But if you're not at substantial risk based on the factors of age, weight and the other comorbidities that can exist that we know exists in the data, you don't have to live your life with extreme caution. You can live your life with very little caution actually, and it's okay. And the rest of the population, I do I agree with Trump. I think should get vaccinated and should take those take those steps of additional safety. But we got to get
back to normal life. But if we allow the little tyrant Fauci to continue to beat his voice, you know, okay, I mean, how much more was it gonna take? You can have six people, not eight people, six people at at you know, Fourth of July party outside for thirty minutes at a time that's safe. I mean, we've seen that level of stupidity with shutting down restaurants. We had we had a curfew in New York at ten pm.
I was chased out of restaurants like I was trying to They caught me trying to steal a t bone steak in my in my handbag or something not that I have a handbagger in my book back whatever. You get what I'm saying. They chased me out like a thief at ten o'clock because it's the curfew time. I mean, how much dumber are we going to get folks before we say we're just not going to listen to these
people anymore. So why would this television character spend so much time I'm on a show throwing shaded vaccines, feeding the fears a half of Republican men who say they do not plan to take it. This television character likes to say he's just asking questions. So here are some questions. Does this character think it's important to slow the spread of the virus? Just asking? Does this character care if the country reaches hurt immunity to return to life and
work safely. Hey, it's a question does Tucker Carlson really want his viewers to live? Look this guy bemoans so called cancel culture more than anyone on earth. But he should look in the mirror because you can't get any more canceled than dead. Oh my gosh, Burman over at CNN, I got it, man, Don't don't poke the bear man, don't poke the sleeping dragon. Here. You're gonna you're gonna get lit up on Tucker's show. And he's got about five six times the audience you do, Burman. So just
slow your role there, buddy. Oh my gosh. You know it doesn't part of it. It's like, okay, he wants to step into the Tucker Thunderdome by all means. But notice the way that he sets this up. It's that Tucker is somehow being reckless or dishonest by asking questions about the vaccine. Meanwhile, in reality world, there are large European countries that have decided that they're going to stop
the distribution of the astra Zenica vaccine because of blood clots. Now, let's just first say I believe the vaccines from what I've seen, are safe and effective and should be taken. The vaccines that arevailable in this country for everything that I've read. I am not a doctor, but I can read and I can think, and it seems the vaccines are safe and effective for people without really without any
major questions or downsides about that. The issue here is there are a lot of people that are saying, I'm at really low risk and I'm not coming too contact with seniors. So why should I get the vaccine if I can't go back to normal life, which is the moronic decision that faucin the others have said, you gotta still mask, You gotta still wear a mask even after the vaccinated. What so ninety five percent protection isn't enough.
I gotta get what one hundred percent protection? A risk free society is a nightmare, and it's not even achievable, but it's a nightmare to even try to get there. And Tucker is asking questions about the vaccine because there are things that are happening in the world that are making people wonder, well, what the heck is going on? And also let's ask this question, should children get it? From what we know, children are at almost zero risk
and very unlikely to spread it. So we're gonna inject everyone's how old you know they make two year olds mask up on planes. Now apparently they're gonna make every two year old and up get a vaccine for COVID. I mean, how many kids have already been exposed to COVID and we have no idea and they've they've cleared it and now they have immunity. Also understand that if we if we cave into this mentality that we have to have a zero risk profile for COVID. I've started
to say this before. We are going there's going to be COVID this summer. There's going to be COVID and even an increase in cases by early next next late next fall, early next winter. It's going to happen. It's not going to be as bad as it was this time around. Hopefully it'll be far, far, far lower, but there will be a recurrence of COVID nineteen. We're not
going to be at all at high en. I've heard immunity that it's like measles, where you have, you know, a handful of cases here and there and that's it. Are we gonna lock down again? Are we going to do this again? We should be having these discussions. How much is too much? For the efforts to slow the spread, like the Bourbon Guide goes, does Tuck or even want his audience to live? I'm pretty sure Tucker wants his fellow human beings and particular his audience to live. Yes,
I'm pretty sure about that one. But in Europe, to give you a sense of what an unaccountable bureaucracy is like, remember, the EU is involved in making a lot of these decisions and this country, as this country is, elite media
has a love affair with European bureaucracy. We're always led to believe, Oh, if only the Democrats were in full control and didn't have these pesky republicans around, our country would run like a Swiss watch, although of course Switzerland is not part of the EU, but our country would run like Denmark, right, Our country would would be this really efficient, healthy, happy place. Well, it's interesting because our
country is obviously a lot larger than Denmark. And when you look at the EU, which is a super country in a sense, but it is in many ways similar to the US, and that there are states, right, there
are member states of the EU. The EU has been really problematic on getting people vaccinated, and his way behind the US in fact, well, this is from a Christina hoff Summers, who's a an academic, one of these academics that's made a name from herself for herself by by asking questions that should be asked and trying to give honest answers to them. If you do that these days in academia, you are a rebel. You are somebody who well, first of all, you're not going to be an academy
for very long. She's actually well, now she's a scholar at AEI, but she was a fali. Yeah, like I didn't even know that. And sure enough, I'm telling you're not going to be an academia for long, and she wasn't. They had to push her out. And here's what she shared. And this is making the rounds. It's a Q and A about Europe's vaccines. Okay, this is from Christina hoff Summer's Twitter account. Question why haven't we been vaccinated already? Answer?
Because the European Commission procured vaccine centrally and wanted to show it could get better terms and lower prices, and that took time. The UK signed with Astra Zenica three months earlier than the EU, for example, so it had another three months to fix glitches in production. Question did the EU get lower prices? Answer? Yes, and more deaths and longer lockdowns that cost much more than the more expensive vaccines. And there were glitches at astra Zenica's factory
in Belgium. Question but doesn't astra Zenica have another vaccine factory in Halleck's in the Netherlands. Yes, but that factory does not have regulatory approval to supply Europe. Gosh, but couldn't their US factory sell the Europe Yes. AstraZeneca has three million unused doses in a warehouse in Ohio that it wants to send to Europe, but the US does not allow it. Fair enough, I guess President Biden wants
the doses for Americans. No, he bans Americans from using them, and the US regulatory process will take at least a month. Oh dear, okay, so just roll out the few vaccines we have in Europe then, sorry. European governments are suspending it now since some who got the JAB developed blood clots, more people than would have developed blood clots in a similar population anyway, No fewer actually, so there is no indication that vaccines caused it. According to the European Medicines Agency.
But that's the precautionary principle for you. We don't accept any risks because this potential side effect would be worse than COVID nineteen oh. No, we are talking of fewer than ten deaths from blood clots, while delaying COVID vaccination by just a week will probably kill thousands. So we have to accept certain disease in death because you worry about a minimal risk of something that would in any case be much less dangerous. Yes, we just want to
keep you safe. You're welcome. This is what Christina Huff Summers shared on her on her Twitter account of Q and A about what's going on. I would I would cite exactly where where it comes from, but I don't. I don't know. But it's making the rounds and it's all it's all accurate on the facts. It's all accurate about what's going on right now. And that's that's really also a snapshot in the mentality of the people that are making all these decisions. They will keep you safe.
The health bureaucrats will keep you safe even if it kills you. That's really the that's really the way they come down on this one. Sure, there's only a one in a million chance that you're actually gonna, you know, actually gonna get some kind of side effect that might kill you from the vaccine. We can't let you take that chance. You might get COVID and die from it in the meantime, but we can't let you take that chance, that one in a million shot. The regulators won't allow it.
This is what happens when you have bureaucrats, particularly a health bureaucracy, making decisions for you. People that are not accountable for you and that are not accountable to you don't care what happens to you. And this is what I think so many I've forgotten all this, doctor Fauci. Whether you live or die does not matter. To doctor Fauci. You are just a number. You are just as statistic. Whether your business thrives or survives or fails does not
matter to him. He does not care. You are just numbers on a board to him, and he's already decided for political reasons which numbers matter more. So, don't ever forget this. It's happening over in Europe with the AstraZeneca vaccine, but it's also a situation that's playing out in this country right now with our lockdown policies. One thing I will say, the Washington Post did a correction. A lot of pressure was put on them, but they did a
correction because they realized what they did was wrong. So now you have to find out was it the Washington Post fault or the people that run the elections in Georgia, Because the people that run the elections in Georgia, they have to be looked at, whether it was a Secretary of State or frankly, the governor of the state. Things went on there between the presidential election, which I can tell you about, or you look at the two Senate elections.
That is such a shame that that happened. Everything that you've been talking about on your show today is affected by those two seats. Those two seats are devastating that we lost, and the Republicans, frankly, were fighting for six hundred dollars versus two thousand dollars and that was the only add that the Democrats took. That was a disaster. They should not have been doing that. Mitch McConnell made a tremendous mistake. He lost those two seats. It was
a huge mistake. I mean, can you imagine what could be a more obvious political move than at a time of crisis, when both parties have decided that there is a real need for the government to send financial assistance to people who have been crushed by government mandated lockdowns and shutdowns of the economy. Why would you want to be the party that says, well, we're gonna give you less money when you're trying to win an election. I mean, I know this is just cold hard politics, but let's
be serious about this, folks. That was disastrous, But there's really Republicans almost have like a like a fetish about how they like to pretend they care about the debt, but only at certain times, and sometimes the most inopportune moment is when they decide to flex on caring about the debt. That's when they decide, yeah, I'm a deficit or debt hawk. Not a good one, not a good time to do this. So Trump is right about that losing those two Georgia Senate seats was disastrous. It was
really really that is also true. We've got that now we're dealing with the consequence of that all the time. I told you, if we if we just maintained the Senate, you basically have gridlock, you'd have Biden, you know, shuffling around going or anything about the thing and the cornpop guy. I talk to him and I said, hey, man, I'm gonna take this chain I got, I got kids talking
about the blonde hairs on my legs. I don't know why Joe Biden all of a sudden sometimes sounds like he's from some other part of the country, but it's really just an old man who yells from Delaware. It's remarkable,
isn't it. But while we're all sitting around trying to figure out what we're gonna do about the possibility of the elimination of the filibuster and what Democrats will get if they can get whatever they want, which is what would happen if you elimited the filibuster, it's tough not to feel a little bit of a little bit of a twinge of ouch when we think about how we
lost two Georgia Senates. We lost the state of Georgia in the presidential election, which is obviously really disconcerting, but then we lost to Georgia seats on the Senate, and you know, we only had to go one for two, we'd be in pretty good shape. We lost them both. Mitch McConnell is the only thing Mitch McConnell seems to do right is judges. I mean, that's it. Mitch McConnell is good on judges and everything else. It really feels like cocaine. Mitch. You don't know what you're gonna get.
You know what you're gonna get. Oh, and when Trump brought up the phone call, remember he had a phone call in December, and then there was the Washington Post story on that phone call in January and somebody was an anonymous source about what Trump said on that phone call, and it was a lie. It turns out it was Georgia Deputy Secretary of State Jordan fuc h S. I don't want to say that on producer Mark Right, that's
not that's not safe. That's not radio safe. There's no way you pronounce it the way that you think you're pronouncing it. You know what I'm saying. But I mean, I can't, Jordan fuc h S, I can't do it, man. It's too close, it's too close to the line. I don't want to get a violation. I get it. You know what I'm saying, so we'll just say miss fuc h s here. Uh, you know, apparently gives zero fuc h s. Is about being truthful? You like that, producer, Mark,
well done, I'll give it to you. Thank you. So she she lied about what Trump said on the call, and now everyone's saying, why would you do that? But here's the thing. You gotta remember the people who really of everybody who hates Trump in some ways the republic, there are Republicans who are the top of the list because for them, the Republican Party was just always a means to an end. It's about them. It's about how it advances their interests, about how it makes them more prominent,
more powerful, in some cases even more wealthy. And Trump stuck his thumb in the eye the establishment. There are people, I mean, there are these never Trump, are still out there for whom getting even with Trump or tearing him down was the most important thing, more important even than supporting the GOP in a bitter election dispute, more important than speaking just honestly to the press about it. Oh,
one more thing. Because the Trumpster decided that he was going to call into Fox, is he going to run again? Play sixteen. Well, based on every poll, they want me to run again. But we're going to take a look and we'll see. We have first steps. First, we have to see what we can do with the House. I think we have a very very good chance of taking back the House. That we did a great job. You know you're gonna lose from fifteen to twenty five seats. The last time I got involved, I worked very hard.
I made tremendous amounts of meeting, speeches and teleconferences and everything else. For fifty six of them. I had fifty six basic teleconferences with thousands of people on the line on each one. And what happened is we ended up winning fifteen states instead of losing potentially twenty five seats. That's a big story, and it almost costs Nancy Pelosia job. I think we have a chance of taking back the House. I think we have a chance to do better in
the Senate. We need leadership in the Senate, which frankly, we don't have. We need better leadership in the Senate. You have a good chance to take back to Senate, and frankly, we'll make our decision after that. Not throw his hat in, not say any WoT get ready for more of that. Let me ask you about Governor Cuomo of New York. I know you said you want the investigation to continue. If the investation confirms the claims of the women, should he resign? Yeah, I think you probably
end up being prosecuted too. But how about right now, and you've said you want the investigation to continue. You saw Chuck Schumer, Senator Schumer, Senator Jellabrand, majority of the congressional delegation don't think he can be an effective governor right now? Ken, He sir, that's a judgment for them to make about their story. They can be effective. Here's my position. That's been my position. Sensor wrote to Violence
Kins Women Act. A woman should be presumed to telling the truth and should not be scapegoated and become victimized by her coming forward number one. But there should be an investigation to determine whether what she says it is true. That's what's going on now. That's a different standard than
what they tried to use to destroy Brett Cavanaugh. I want to be very clear about this, and I haven't forgotten that, and I certainly haven't forgiven that either the attempted character assassination of Brett Kavanaugh was one of the ugliest things I've ever seen in American politics and something that I will never forget because it really showed the true nature and character of the Democrat Party that they were willing to subvert decency and truth and fairness and
honesty in the name of those things. Really almost satanic in the approach. I mean, just take what is good and virtuous and true and flip it upside down and act like you've done everybody a favor. It was awful what they did to Kavanaugh, but it is fascinating now to see how they recognize this is not a standard that you can actually keep. I mean, you cannot have a believe all women standard because, for one, just like men,
women are capable of lying. And also beyond that, just like everything else, people need to have their due process rights. People need that they're entitled to that. And there's a reason why even in English common law. Mean, you can take this back a very long way and you find out that this is this is an essential foundational concept for a free society, because otherwise we're all just subject to destruction at the whims of those who have ugly motives.
Now that all set, Yeah, I think Cuomo did the things that he's accused of doing. I think it's interesting that Biden says that he may be prosecuted because our terminology around these things and the way we'll talk about the Cuomo allegations, as people will say that, well, it's sexual misconduct. Yeah, that spans a very wide array of things. That the sexual misconduct could cover a whole lot of territory.
So it's so broad, it's so vague, it's so non specific as to be sometimes it's not very useful in discussions about this, right, sexual misconduct? Is that an unwanted comment? Or is it groping somebody? And I think you see how this can this can expand this can get much. You know that this can be a problem when when you have someone like Biden say that, you know, Cuomo could be prosecuted. I mean, I haven't heard of any criminal conduct. Maybe there's one woman that says that he
kind of like grabbed her a little bit. I don't think he groped her in a private area. He grabbed her on the back or something to take a photo. I mean, well, you're gonna send someone to prison for this? I mean you know, everybody's kind of you know, grabby uncle at every wedding they've ever been to, or something is going to go to prison. You don't go to prison for that. Inappropriate behavior from a boss is something that the boss should either get fired for or have
to step down for. But to say that this is criminal. Look, and you know, I'm no I'm no Cuomo fan, but I do see something going on here. I think he's guilty of the harassment at the comments. I think he's a gross guy, and he's a bully in fact here even as worse, this was really interesting. Cuomo's vaccine. I want to return to this point, but first you have this is the Guardian. Cuomo's vaccines are pleased to support governor,
Please to support governor, raise ethical concerns. This was just a couple of days ago in the Guardian, a British paper, but same idea. The coronavirus vaccinations are for the New York Governor. Andrew Cuomo made appeals for political support for
the embattled politician, prompting ethical concerns. According to multiple media reports on Sunday, New York's vaccinations are longtime Cuomo aide Larry Schwartz reportedly pivoted in at least one telephone conversation with the county executive from a discussion of vaccination policy directly to an appeal for support for Cuomo. Schwartz has denied mixing political and policy calls are acting improperly. So I just want to know that's that's how serious things
have gotten here for Cuomo. That now it's it's even it's it's credible that somebody acting on Cuomo's behalf may have been pushing for Hey, you know, nice vaccine program he got there. It's a shame. It's something that happens to it if you don't support Cuomo. You know, this is fascinating that this is what we've come to. And I know that they deny it, but the fact that it's even believable about this guy just goes to show you what a bully he is, what a jerk he is,
and just a just a bad guy all around. But then there's the other part of me with this whole thing, and I gotta say this, they're so dug in, they're so focused on taking down Cuomo on the issue of harassing women, in my opinion, because they don't want to focus on the nursing home disaster. No, why is that, Well, it's because the nursing home disaster goes to Democrat policy. The nursing home disaster is something where you'd have to say, hold on a second. It's not only just New York
that did this. Also New Jersey's Governor Murphy not quite to the same extent, but made a similarly egregiously stupid and possibly le likely lethal decision. And we were told the beginning. I remember when it was the Red states that we're going to get hit by COVID and not the Blue states. You remember that people were actually saying that all over the place. Oh, the Red States they don't take science seriously. So it's the blue states that are going to be doing really well because they listen
to the science. And now we've seen what are the worst states for COVID. We've run the experiment for the full year. What are the worst states per capita for COVID? New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Rhode Island. This is the worst states for COVID. Isn't that interesting? What do all those states have in common? Pennsylvania's right up there too, But what do all those states have in common, not Republicans in control, not people who are masked deniers running
the health board or the local government. But they don't want to pay attention to that. Here's the problem for Democrats. Not only do they want to avoid the public figuring out how wrong they were about COVID, because it's a bad look for it. When I say wrong about COVID, I mean about lockdowns and mass restrictions and all these other things. That's a bad look. They just feel silly, look stupid. They want to keep the power to do
this going forward. They won't go into a full on lockdown in these states, but they will try to have restrictions. You know they'll they'll go back. Do they love this? Oh, you can't have a hundred people in your restaurant, you know, only seventy five. Or you can't and have you know, ten people in this room only eight? You know they're
gonna start. This is their new the new world they think we're all living in, where bureaucrats for your health can make whatever arbitrary, annoying restriction on you that they feel like, and all in the name of COVID nineteen, all in the name of saving you from a virus. They're not going to give that up there. They're not going to say enough's enough of that. And so that's why they can't allow the narrative around Cuomo to be
that he's a disaster on the nursing homes. It's all about the sexual harassment stuff, because they also are all patting themselves on the back for saying, oh, look, we're doing stories on him. We've uncovered the sexual harassment, don't you see, We've uncovered the sexual harassment. Whereas on the other side of it, they were holding him up as the paragon of COVID fighting virtue, and that whiplash for the public maybe too much. That shift in thinking might
actually settle into with some people. And they realized, hold on a second, the media elige was the media were wrong about this guy in a profound way, and they should lose credibility. They should be held to account for this as well. Well. The chief proponent of this and and forgive me, this is just objective truth. The chief proponent of this recall petition supports putting microchips into migrants,
into immigrants. The other proponents, the chief, the top ten proponents, the people that are behind this are members of the three percenters, the right wing militia group the Proud Boys supported the insurrection, are folks that quite literally enthusiastically support QAnon conspiracies. And so that's the origin here. Now as it relates to the people that signed this petition, it just takes one quarter of people that supported Donald Trump to put a petition and the ballot, or rather recall
on the ballot. We're one of just nineteen states in the country that allows this process, but we have the lowest threshold in America. And of course you're all very familiar. We had a recall not too many years ago, in two thousand and three, and so Whip. It goes to your original question, am I worried about Of course I'm worried about it. The nature of these things, the upper down question is there some nature of the question is challenging and vexing, and so you know, we're taking it seriously.
I have to do my job every single day. But I'm going to fight this thing because I'm gonna fight for California values and the things I hold dear. And I think the vast majority of Californians, regardless of their political stripeshold dear he's gonna fight for California values. Well, he makes sure that he just looks so suave and in command and control. Gavin Newsom out in California. I'm gonna fight for your California values, baby, this guy, I swear,
it's amazing. Yeah, the Proud Boys and the three percenters. I think one percent is a reference to like biker gangs that are outlawed, biker gains. Well, I don't even I don't even know what a three percenter is, But anyway, a proud the Proud Boys, right wing militias in California are the reason that he's facing a really serious recall effort. That's what we're told. This is what this guy. This
is what this guy's trying to sell. It's not the tents all over the streets of Los Angeles and the massive homeless crisis and the poop on the streets and the dirty needles, and it's not any of that in San France. In Los Angeles. Oh no, it's not incredibly high taxes with very low government accountability because the state
government is entirely in the hands of Democrats. It's not the widening gap between the coastal elites and all their servants and and you know, cooks and the people that are doing all the menial tasks for them every day, who live more in the interior of the state. You know, you have extreme wealth for a mile or two hugging the coast all along California, and then you go into the interior, and especially in the urban areas, it gets more and more poor. And you know, people are voting
with their feet. We all see what's happening. You are witnessing the collapse of the blue state welfare first model. You are seeing the the you know, the the Venezuela ization, if you will, from it from the perspective of the
the extremely rich and the extremely poor. I mean, you're seeing a kind of a quasi socialist state and action in some of these places like California is a great example of it, because you have the ultra rich who are and now, of course Venezuela is all collapsing an anarchy, but you still have some very very rich people in Venezuela, and you have a whole lot of very very poor people. But you know, Latin America has long been defined by
an incredible elite of wealth. That's one that's sort of one strand one band of society, and then you go below that and people are desperately poor, you know, really poor, not poor by our standards, really poor. Well, what you see in California is that people are realizing, hold on a second, I can do my job. I can work in my industry. Or maybe I'll just switch industries and live in Idaho, live in Texas, live in Florida with
much lower taxes, much higher quality of life. And I don't have, you know, quite the same amount of you know, transgender sports, ideology, indoctrination in the local public schools. I mean, it's not quite as left wing in a lot of these places as it is in California. And people are saying they've had enough. And by the way, to the Californians listening, I don't we have a big audience in California.
We've got KiB in Los Angeles and we've got people listening, and Sandy KFMB and San Diego, and you know, to the people that are in California who listen to this show, I just say, you know, I feel I feel your pain. I do though I do feel your pain because I'm in New York. Is the same thing here. We're at the losing end of this proposition of the great migration that's going on. We're at the losing end of what's
actually happening in America today at the state level. People, I don't I don't want to keep paying a big chunk of my income to state and local government to live in New York City. I mean, I'm just gonna say that, I don't want to keep doing it. And theres you say, Buck, why don't you move? Well? I have you know, I have obligations here for work, and I got I'd have to set up things to do remote, and it's it's not as simple for me as it would be for some other people. My two brothers have
already moved. They're in Florida. They're not coming back. They're gone. They By the way, w IOD Miami, you've got two Sexton brothers down there, so take good care of them. Okay, you've got two of the Sextons, and you might have more, all right, Producer Mark Bruce, and Mark likes Miami from what I understand, right, I do enjoy that Florida quite
a bit. Yeah. Yeah, So for the WIOD listeners, you've already got almost half of the Sexton family down there, and you may get you may get more Sextons yet because they're loving it. They love they love the people, they love the food, they love the weather, and they definitely love the zero state income tax. What's the pitch why moved to New York or California right now? And
remember those are the two Blue strongholds. The representation, the day to day representation of the Democrat model for American life is what you see in New York and in California, and Los Angeles and New York City are obviously the two biggest cities, the two biggest representations of that. And they're disasters right now. I mean they're they're just in a spiral, and a lot of it's really being held together with you know, spit and scotch tape at this point.
The real estate market. I just spoke to a real estate broker yesterday here in New York and she said, everyone's pretend ending like things are getting better. She told me it's really not because people haven't come back. So they're keeping demand artificially low by not listing a lot of properties, a lot of rentals, a lot of sale properties for sale, properties that should be on the market because they realize if everyone sees what's out there, prices
are going to collapse. I mean, that's what we're facing in New York. I can't speak to what's going on in California. Some KiB listeners can tell me. But we're talking about about the creation of artificial scarcity in the housing market so that the housing prices don't go down thirty or forty percent. And I think, you know, you
could see that in these cities. And if that happens, then you get into a hold downward spiral because people started leaving tax base fleas can't pay the obligations you have. City government starts to shrivel up. You get into real problems and people who have said, well buck. But look at California and New York in the nineties, the early
two thousands, huge success stories. I mean, to me, growing up as a kid watching movies as much as I did and everything else, California in the nineties was like paradise, you know, late eighties, early nineties, it just you know, you just wanted to be in California and Los Angeles and Diego. I grew up thinking I like New York a lot, but God, that's where people really haven't made Now. Those people are fleeing. They're showing up in Austin. What's up, KLBJ.
They're showing up in Austin and saying, hey, you guys, got room for us here? And of course the conservatives in places like Texas are saying, can you please not inflict your big government, big big state policies here that ruined where you came from. Can you just do us that favor? Can you do us that sell? I think that's an entirely reasonable ask. However, I can't promise you that that's gonna that's gonna stick. I think we're all seeing what's actually gonna happen here, and it's the Blue
states are gonna bleed over into the Red states. See no party like a Team Buck party, because a Team Buck party don't stop. It's time for roll call. Time for the roll call, everybody, Facebook dot com, slash Buck Sexton Team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com and let's get right into all the latest here. Oh make sure you go check in at Bucksxon dot com and got a piece up there on why the Democrats don't really want this border crisis to stop. They want to leverage the
border crisis. They want to use it for their own purposes. And so there's that. And then I'm also trying to find a new show that I can really get excited about. I'm watching this show broad Church producer Mark, which is I mean, it's it's about a murder of a kid, but then it's like a murder mystery, but then it kind of keeps going. It's very well acted, but very depressing. Do you have anything happy for me to watch? Happy for you to watch? Did I tell you about ted Lasso? No?
What's ted Lasso? Ted Lasso is probably one of the best comedies I've seen. Honestly, I think I have told you about this. It's um the guy from SNL Fred No, not Fred Armiston, Jason Sadakis, I believe it is his name. He plays a soccer coach who has only ever coached American football before, and he goes over to coach a Premier League soccer team because the new owner of this team wants to get back at her ex husband and hire the worst coach possible, and he ends up being
great and they win the league. I mean this sounds I mean spoiler alert, but that's okay. So this actually sounds this actually sounds right up my alley. So where do I watch this? This is on Apple TV. It's just an app. You don't have to buy any unit or anything. It's just like it's like Netflix. You just get an I'm sure you didn't. You just buy a new TV. I did just get a new team. There's no chance that the Smart TV does not have you
can't download the Apple TV app. Yeah, I think it's gotta it's gotta work now, right, I mean, come on, yeah, I can. I I've also I've been looking for something to really zone out too. So I used to be all about Call of Duty on the PlayStation for platform, which that's right, I've gone. The pandemic has pushed me back into video games. I cannot. I cannot tell a lie. Um. Now, I've been playing this game called blood Borne, which is actually quite fun. It's about five years old, but it's
a really good game. I've heard of it. Yeah, you know, monster and zombie fighting and stuff. But if you really want to turn it. I just can't handle anything that's about like news or you know, the intelligence community or law enforcement, like it's all the very stressful right now. So so you know, fighting fighting werewolves is only stressful if you're actually fighting a werewolf. You know what I'm saying exactly now, it might be a great time for
you to get into Harry Powder. Then I am. Right now, I'm working my way through yet another book on the Hannibal the Punic Wars, as well as another Stalin biography. I'm on my second Stalin biography right now because I feel like it's a good time to learn a bit more about totalitarianism and the destruction of all freedom producer Mark, because I think it's a good thing to know about an America right now. It's all I'm gonna say. It's a little little worrisome. My eyes start drooping and getting
closed when you start talking about books you're reading. Yeah, I know, this is you know what I do my my Quake media show with Mark Lamont Hill. We did a little just a little video cast over the weekend together and he refers to some of my history interests as my quote nerds stuff, and I it's not untrue, but it is what it is to each his own. You love history. I respect that. It's just bores me. Yeah, no, And I know, really, if I could just sort of
pick something. Although I loved coaching soccer actually just got a funny me. I coached high school soccer for a season. But if I could just pick something to do that will be a lot of fun. I think being a history professor would be fun. Oh, I actually do have something for you, though, I don't know if you like this. Netflix has a couple of history based series that I really recommend to people. One is on It's basically sixteenth
century Japan. The samurai warlord's called the Daimio fighting each other for dominance of the Japanese main level Japanese island, and it's really really well done. I actually not Michael Oslin, who is a scholar at the what's that place called the Hoover Institute. He's one of the guys who does the voice over an analysis, but they do pretty well. It's pretty good reenactments and stuff, so it's well produced.
And there's also one on pirates and the Golden Age of pirates in the early seventeen hundreds, which is a fascinating period. It's actually something I've read a bit about on my own as well. And you know, producer Mark this is I think people should know that you know, the reason people always think like, where does pirate language come from? Pirate language is actually English from othern England slang. Because the original sort of famous pirates were in the British.
They were either British privateers in the British navy largely though they're British privateers. What happened was that the British to fight against the Spanish. This, you know, the Spanish, which were they were the Great Empire at the time, the British kind of supplanted them to fight against them. They commissioned privateers, which is just a fancy way of saying pirates that the state says are okay, right, So if you're a British privateer, you can go attack any
Spanish stuff you want. So the British were like, we got this great idea, We're gonna get a free navy effectively to fight against the Spanish by calling them privateers.
But what they actually made were pirates because when the war ended with Spain, these guys are all our mate and they're used to plundering and fighting and now they're told yeah, well that's now illegal, you can't do that anymore, and they're like, actually we can, right, half the audience right now is into this and really loves what you're saying. In the other half is me fair enough? All right? Facebook dot com slash Buck Sexton and if you want
to get into it, send us a message there. Chris first up here in roll call, Hey Buck and producer Mark. Great job, guys, thanks for always giving us the truth, whether you want to hear it or not. Great job exposed and terrible Colorado Governor. I heard you say you've never been to Colorado. Please visit. Oh this guy told him about the beer. I'm sorry we did that one yesterday, but that's all right. It was a great one, Chris.
We appreciate it. Corey Buck, I'm in McKinney, Texas, and the mask mandate has been lifted a few days now, but most are of the businesses are still posting signs to wear masks. I do not wear a mask, and I'm not harassed, but I was shocked at the large majority that are still wearing masks. I just don't get it. I mean, Corey, I as soon as I can get away. You know, when I say get away with it, I mean not be physically escorted out of the premises. I'm going to stop wearing a mask. I think this is
I think the data on this is clear. I know people don't want to believe it, but look at mask mandates, look at caseloads in places all over the country, and their only real answer for it, Corey is oh, but people weren't obeying the mandate. I'm here in New York City. People wear masks outside, overwhelmingly outside, never mind inside. If you walk into an indoor establishment in New York without a mask on someone, it's like they're going to tackle you to the ground and hold you until you know
the squat team can arrive. They lose their minds. So trust me, people are obeying these mandates. The mandates, I'm sorry, the mandates worked maybe one percent. That's the CDC's data. You were stifling your own breath and breathing in you know, your own whatever the whole time. Because i gotta tell you, sometimes you remember what you had for lunch because of
what you got in the mask. I'm just saying it's happened you were doing all of that, because it might have reduced cases over a sixty day period one percent, well if one percent declines in a widespread malady, justify whatever intervention, as Fauci calls it, the government wants to do. Freedom is dead in this country. So just remember that. Oh, Corey goes on. Also, the local school district is requiring
students age ten plus to wear masks at school. When I'm questioned the reason, I received the same following the science BS. Oh, Rather, when I questioned that the reason I received the same following the science PS. Local elections are in May for my community. I used to not care about the city may or school board members, but I care now. Well, Corey, Yeah, the good news is I think for a lot of people, they become more
engaged in politics at a local level. I think I think there's a greater recognition now that you can avoid caring about your school district for only so long. But if you got kids, eventually, your school districts probably gonna care about you. Unles, You're gonna put him in private school or parochial school, and that matter. It matters to people. And the fact that we're masking up all these kids in school, I mean, can you imagine, Oh God, David right, Buck,
I'm a faithful listener here in Austin, Texas. What up KLBJ fam, don't think it's time to bring up articles of impeachment on Biden for endangering national security with the border. Oh sorry, I keep misreading your roll calls. Guys. Don't you think it's time to bring up articles of impeachment on Biden for endangering national security with the border fiasco? Democrats began impeachment proceedings against Trump the day he was in office on fabricated charges. The immigration disaster of Biden
is real, therefore he should be impeached. Okay, David, I get where your head's at on this one. First of all, thank you for being a faithful listener in Austin, and I maybe in Austin next month as part of a plan that I will be telling you more about here and producer Mark, I'll tell you more about it offline, but I may be in Austin for it there two next month, so I'm I might finally be able to
do that whole. Hey, team BAK, come hang out with me at the best barbecue place in Austin, and you'll have to tell me what that is, and hopefully we can all just sort of go in there and eat meat and drink booze and hang out. You know, if two people show up, great, If fifty people show up, what we'll make room. So as for articles of impeachment, if you're gonna do that, and I agree that impeachment articles now have been have been really put in a
place where there are a weapon in politics. It's not really a good faith thing anymore. It's is this useful for my side? That's what impeachment is all about. And given that that is what impeachment is all about, I think the question that becomes what is the issue that you choose to move on against somebody like Biden. I don't think the border is the one to do it on, because what exactly, you know, we're gonna try to get them on dereliction of duty? You're talking about a straight
party line situation. And Democrats have a majority in the House and the Senate. So remember when Democrats were doing their impeachment nonsense against Trump, they controlled the House, so they could sort of do the show trial thing even you know, even though they knew it was going nowhere in the Senate. They got to control the rhythm of things in the House and get all that you know, pr and nonsense BS mileage out of it. We would be in a situation where you could. You couldn't even
bring it forward right now. So you gotta take back the house, David, taking back the house. You gotta take back the house or else we can't. Actually, you probably you don't even know what talking heads are, due producer mark the term talking heads. Yeah, I do. No the band, oh no, no clue bringing down the house all right. Anyway, I can only imagine they're not good. If you like them, it makes me sad more row call. We got Gina,
who never likes to be Mina. She's Gina. Personal story about the kids suffering in the lockdowns due to a family crisis. I took in my grandkids, a boy and a girl, eleven and nine at the time in November twenty nineteen. We've always been close. We got them registered, started school in three days. It was awesome. I was able to shift to work from home and I was up every morning cooking breakfast again and getting them off to school. My grandson was in Karate and my granddaughter
in stem. Then came March twenty twenty, all school now online. For three months it was pathetic, forty five minutes a day, no plan, but we soldiered on through summer. Then August came and school was still online better at four point five hours or so, but I was seeing different kids. They began to fight, sitting at the same dining room table, and began wandering the house every five minutes. My grandson was in karate but in my small living room and
was frustrated. STEM four Sophia was canceled by December, our frustration growing, we asked for a break and the kids went to stay with their aunt for a few days in Tech. After four days, they decided they wanted to stay because they can go to school. They're thriving, loving school, being with their friends and in person learning. I miss them. But the moral of the story, what this is doing
to children, to their families, is incomprehensible. I think we will see ramifications from this travesty for years, maybe decades to come. Sorry so long, I wanted to know we're real people with real heartache. She'll tell you, well, Gina, I absolutely know that, and I appreciate you writing in and sharing your story. And I can guarantee you there are a lot of people listening to this that have
very similar situations all across the country. I guarantee you there are a lot of people that are hearing this and saying, oh my gosh, I've had I've had similar stuff with my kids, or if you're dealing with the grandkids, whatever it may be. So, the decision to shut down schools was not rooted in science. It was disastrous, it was wrong, and that Democrats will not undo their wrong decision is just stubbornness, vanity and selfishness. That's what this is. Now.
It's the teachers' unions, you know, making sure that they pull the strings in the Democrat Party. It's disgusting, absolutely disgusting, all right, Alex, Next up here, Hey, Buck and Mark. As a former marine, the recent events regarding Tucker, Carlston and the DoD turn my stomach. That said, I believe the entire dust up is a purposeful distraction. As I've stated in previous notes to you, I think Obama is running this show, and he is an expert at division
and distraction. The borders in chaos. They're spending us into oblivion, and lawlessness is on the rise across the country. Why the heck is anyone talking about flight suits for pregnant women? A total distraction? Look over here while we burn in pillage, disgraceful, stay in the fight semper five, Alex, thank you for your service, sir, thank you for writing in. And absolutely the Democrats are engaged in a lot of efforts at distraction, and they've got remember the media is not just complicit.
I mean the media is co located with them, it's cohabitating with them, it's right next to them. The media is the Democrat Party, and the Democrat Party is the media. So whatever they have to do to help Biden, whatever they have to do, is the most the single most important outcome of their day, and that's how they view
all this. Mark writes Heybuck. After being censored on social media and about pulling my hair out every time I flipped on the local news only to hear the same garbage for months on end, I decided to flip through some stations on my way home from work one day a month or so ago to see if there was something to listen to that would make sense of what we've been experiencing in our nation for the last year. Well,
lo and behold, what I heard was absolutely amazing. A hilarious impersonation of Fauci, followed up by some amazing commentary about the ridiculousness of our times, masks, lockdowns, Liberal takeover. I'd never even heard of you before, but now I'm a regular listener of your podcast using the Stitcher app. I eagerly look forward to your impersonation of Fauci, Biden, Pelosi, Cuomo, and others, as well as your insights. If Cuomo got an Emmy for being an idiot, you should definitely get
one for the best political voice over work. Keep up the great work. There are many like myself that are on your side. We just get busy with the day to day as regular workers in this great country don't have the time to sit around and be as vocal as those on the left. Shields high Well, Mark, that is a really, really kind and fantastic note. Thank you so much. Great to have a new member of team book. Honored that you're listening and you're enjoying what we do here,
and just a reminder of folks. I mean, Mark is an example of what I'm talking about. People hear this show and then this becomes the show they listen to. I make no bones about it. I think this is the best show of its kind out there right now. There are other very good shows, and I respect those folks. I think this is the best show, so I hope you'll listen. I hope you'll spread the word about it, And until tomorrow, Friends, Shields High
