Will Biden Quarantine Florida?

corporate media. That's a rule. Now. You may not have seen it or read that posted anywhere, but it's true because Governor Ronda Santis of Florida is under assault from all across the country now from the Libs, from the Democrats who insist that what he is doing is reckless, who insists that the state of Florida is some god forsaken hell hole, when in reality, everybody who goes there says,

how do I move here? If you live in a blue state that has been under lockdowns for months and months and months, if you live in one of these Democrat run tyrannies and you go down for a visit to Florida, you say, oh, so is just better down here right now? Why don't I get a piece of this? And they hate him for it. They hate him also because now they're just making incoherent arguments. Incoherent arguments, New York Times writing about how Americans must ensure that their

masks are doubled up or tightened up. Now, those of you who listen to this show every day, now that I have been on this for many months now, I've been telling you, they're going to tell you double mask. They're going to suddenly discover, oh, n ninety five masks are in fact, considerably more effective than the little cloth mask you have on. They're going to figure out that bandanas do very little. And they're going to tell you that this is now the grounds for new mandates, new restrictions,

more power for them, less freedom for you. And now here we are. Let's just go over this argument for a second. I want to get back into the Florida situation because I think that that now is going to be the primary struggle for liberty in this country is going to play out in many ways with Florida versus the federal government. The Biden administration cannot allow the success of the Sunshine State in the face of COVID to continue.

They have to create a different narrative. And if they have to cheat somehow, if they have to create a travel ban for people from Florida or to Florida. Oh, that's already being reported. They're thinking about it. That's right, the place where everyone's going to escape the idiot tyranny of the Fauciites. That's the place that has to be punished. But let's start with their argument on masks. And this is why I have been once again throttled on Twitter.

So people can't see what I say on Twitter. They show it to maybe three percent or two percent my Twitter audience. Thank god I have this show, I have this radio program, I have my podcast. Thank God I can actually still reach people and make these arguments in this way, because if I try to rely on the social media platforms, they shut me down. They shut the guy down. To be clear, who is documented as saying in October of last year, the double mask mandate is coming.

It is now the middle of February. And guess what CDC guidances double mask or wear a more tightly fitted mask. That's the way they're going to try to get around this. So it's enough of a CDC mandate to harass you. So now people can say, excuse me, sir, can you put two masks on before you come into my store? And if you don't, someone's gonna say, why don't you

take the virus? Seriously? But when you see politicians and people who are telling you to be terrified, and they're clearly not terrified of the virus, they'll say, whoa, my mask was very snugly fitted. Remember this, do not forget it. It will be essential to understand what is happening in the months ahead. The worst tyranny is not the absolute enforcement of strict rules. The worst tiery tyranny is the capricious enforcement of arbitrary rules. Some people get punished, some

people don't. Some people have to live with these extreme measures. Other people always get a pass, because how do you even operate it in a society like that. It's actually just all about power. It's not even based on shared belief and shared principle at all. There's no shared goal in a society like that. It's just people wanting to control you. So now the guy who tells you me that this is what's going to happen, how did I know it was going to happen? How did I know

that we would get to a double mask mandate. Well, I looked at what was happening in countries all over the world where they were lying primarily on their mask policy to bring down COVID nineteen cases, and you couldn't see a clear correlation. And if you can't see a clear correlation, how effective can it possibly be? And you sit here and you look around, you say, also, if this is so straightforward, I mean, this is the primary

argument that I've been making for a long time. If this is so straightforward, how is it that the height of the medical profession, that the top of the national the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease doctor Fauci, who you know, I think is really he's like the evil little you know, Rasputin in a lab coat of our time. I mean, I think this guy is a nightmare for civil liberties. I think he's a nightmare for the politicization of medicine. I think he's awful. I want

to be very clear about this. And he's been wrong and he never admits it, and he won't stand up in favor of freedom. This guy's the worst. How is it that, exactly, give or take a few weeks, a year ago, he's laughing at the idea we have a pandemic coming that we believe has a four to five percent fatality rate. That was a year ago. As we know, it's considerably less than one percent, but we thought it

was four or five percent. That was what the early reports were, and it was spreading all over the place, and Fauci basically waved his hand. It might make people feel better to wear masks, but it really doesn't do anything. That's a year ago, and they can't erase that. They can. They can shout at you, they can yell at you. They can do if it's that effective. I mean, can you imagine do you think that, you know, do you think that a doctor would go on TV and say, hey,

you know, turns out, you know, the polio vaccination. We really don't think it's that effective. So like, you know, no one needs to get it, don't worry about it, and then a year later go, actually, the only way we're going to defeat polios with a vaccination. No, they wouldn't, they wouldn't change their tomb that dramatically on something so essential with so many lives at stake, And they say it's obvious. Remember they didn't do some brand new study,

they didn't have some new scientific discovery. It's oh, what do you mean, of course we all have to wear masks. Of course, a year ago you were saying it was dumb, It was silly. Why do they have people go what about doctors. Doctors wear a mask in a limited clinical setting, properly fitted, they change them, they wear fresh ones, and even then they can still get sick. But they're directly

exposing themselves. We could all walk around with helmets on because of falling debris from buildings, but construction workers more important, they wear helmets. Right. How many construction workers do you know have actually been hit with debris on their head? Probably zero, But in that one situation, in that one k it, you know, in that limited circumstance, it's fine. What we're doing now is we're all construction workers and we have to sleep with our helmets on all the

time because you never know when falling debris is gonna happen. Right, I mean they've expanded our risk parameters into silly territory, meaning that we actually we can't allow for any risk in society. This is how I saw this coming because the places that are the most I mean, they were smoked. I mean, there was an arrogance in California, you remember this with Gavin Newsom. In the middle of the summer, the weather was a little bit warmer, Yeah, we masked up.

We know what we're doing. I had people that were telling me friends of mine who are lives because I do have lib friends. Yeah, so what if there's all these BLM protests, they're all masked up, it's not a problem. And it's say, is that really the Is that really the standard? Now, it's not a problem to mass together in close quarters when you're when you're masked up. That's interesting. Let's see how that. Let's see how that turns out.

And then the explosion of cases in California, explosion of cases in New York and New Jersey, all across the country, and you know what they're saying, now, mask up even more. This is from the New York Times piece. Doctor Brooks emphasized that masking as Americans currently practice it is not insufficient, but the new advice offers an opportunity to take it

to the next level. Oh okay. Quote, Now, we're worried about forms of the virus that may transmit more efficiently or undercut the utility of existing diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines. We need to up our game to slow the spread of the virus. The real problem, folks, they won't say it this way, because then the public might realize what a bunch of clowns who don't understand life trade offs

and policy we're listening to here. And you know, the Great Barentting Declaration has essentially been scrubbed from the internet. The thousands and thousands of doctors and scientists who are saying we're doing this wrong, scrubbed, took it down off a Facebook. It's like it never happened. This is Soviet Union level cleansing of history and debate and thought. It's going on in America right now. It's either real problem.

The reason that we have all these issues with COVID nineteen, it's not that this is a virus that spreads easily among human beings and there's no way the government was going to be able to protect you from this that. It's not any of that. It's we didn't do a good enough job listening to them, which is what I told you would be their excuse all along, all the mask mandates, all the lockdowns. You cannot look at what happened in this country over this winter and say, yeah,

we stopped the virus. Remember at the beginning, it was flattened the curve, which is just a slowing of cases. We got sold into this with the understanding that, oh, this virus was gonna spread. We just didn't want it to all hit it one, so we were trying to extend the caseload over a longer period of time to make sure that we didn't overwhelmed hospital capacity. Let me ask you this, how many hospitals were overwhelmed in this country?

Unable and when I say hospital, if someone had to go from one hospital to another where they had that, that's not an overwhelmed hospital system, so you still get care. How many places were there people who were unable to be treated for COVID nineteen in America because the hospital system simply had no more doctors, no more beds, nothing. Last I checked, it was zero. How many times did you hear that was going to happen? I don't know.

A thousand news articles probably came across my screen. Oh, the overwhelmed, the hospitals close to overwhelmed, about to be overwhelmed. Who was telling you last June that test in trace was moronic? Moronic for a disease at this level of spread. What they're gonna They're gonna trace one hundred thousand cases a day, And are they kidding? They're gonna find everyone who's been in contact with hundreds of thousands of people across the country and that's how we're going to fight

the virus. Yeah. That to remember, you were hearing a lot Nancy Plesy. Test and trace was supposed to be what would be necessary to get us out of this. They actually had test and trace mandates in place from New York before we could reopen, and then they realized they were never going to get it in place and time, so they had to finally reopen without actually meeting their own standards. They've been wrong so much. When when are we allowed to say enough is enough? They've been wrong

so many times. Now they're telling you double mask. I said they would, they would tell you this is what we needed to do. It's on record. I said it months ago, and people who were now saying double mask shouted me down. That's idiotic. Don't say you don't know what you're listen to. As listen to Fauci the bleating

of sheep. They're really sheep whose aspiration as a society is to turn into lemmings so they can take us all over the cliff together, all because they think if they listen to the so smart people, we'll be safer, we'll be fine. We'll all live forever our news for them, none of us will. This is the Buck Sexton Show Podcast. Follow Buck on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. The media is

worried about that, obviously, you guys really love that. You don't care as much if it's a quote peaceful protest, and then it's fine. You don't care as much if they're celebrating a Biden election. You only care about it if it's people that you don't like. So I'm a Bucks fan. I'm damn proud of what they did on Sunday night. And so in terms of the UK variant, here's what we know. We know based on all the evidence that these vaccines are going to be effective against that,

and that's really the main concern. I mean, we're getting our seniors vaccinated. We've not seen any data or any evidence to suggest that these vaccines are not effective, and so if we get the seniors vaccinated, we're going to be good. And that's what we're gonna do, not panicking, not allowing the media narrative to drive policy, governed scientists, just saying we got this We're going to do what is reasonable and what we can do, and that's all

I ask for. That's all I've wanted all along, for politicians to understand that a do no harm approach for COVID policy would have been far better than what we've had, because they've made so much worse. They've politicized the hell out of this thing. And we see it all the time. If there are people that the media doesn't like who aren't wearing masks outside and so it doesn't matter, it's a front page news story. If there are BLM protesters for just oh yes, they've achieved so much of that,

haven't they so much justice? Then we're told that it's fine, that the virus all of a sudden will take a kind of holiday and nothing will happen. That's just not true. And yet there's the possibility the federal government will go after Florida here, that's right. The federal government may decide to make an example of Rhonda Santis and those who

support his approach. This is from the Miami Herald. The Biden administration is considering whether to impose domestic travel restrictions, including on Florida, fearful that coronavirus mutations are threatening to reverse hard fought progress on the pandemic. Now, notice that they're going They're going specifically after Florida here because they're saying, oh, they've and the excuses, well, they found more of the

variance in Florida. Does anyone think that the variance of the UK strain or the South Africa strain or whatever strain are limited to Florida at this point? Does anyone really think that the federal government isn't isn't a little bit at least thinking about how they can slap down the descentists approach, because it undermines what has Joe Biden done that's better than what Trump was doing. Name one

thing on COVID response one thing. I'm a double mask, come or a double mask because you know, because I believe in science. So in our triple mask, come triple masking. You know. The problem with everyone thinking that the masks are going to be our salvation here is that people unmask themselves in front of other people constantly. You can't have an entirely masked society, and so over time people are just exposed of this. Over time, essentially everybody gets

exposed to it. They've led us to believe, if only we listen more, some people would never even come into contact with the virus to be fun, no real threat of infection. Well, we're seeing how that plan has worked out so far. How much worse would it be anywhere else? Take a look at what's gone on here the Biden

administration imposing possible domestic travel restrictions. I am starting to get really worried that the reset in the stock market, in the economy, and a great financial calamity is coming to this country because of moron woke lib Biden voters. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Join the conversation and message Buck on Facebook, Instagram, or email Team Bucket I Heartmedia dot com. If you may read it on

the show. If you look at the projection, I would imagine by the time we get to April, that will be what I would call from you for better wording open season. Namely, virtually everybody in anybody, in any category could start to get vaccinated. Now, shouldn't that mean that we could establish at some point, all right, everybody, we've all had our chance to get vaccinated. Can't we just decide now? Okay? By June we go back to normal life. Enough,

they won't do that. In fact, Fouci has already said that you should be prepared to wear your mask and all the nonsense, all the anxiety, all the finger pointing from the anxious little tattle tales that watch too much MSNBC. How dare you take your mask off in the store to drink water? You're putting us all at risk? How much longer we'll deal with that till at least the end of this year, he says. Then, if Fauci's telling you by November or December, we can start to let

our guard down, as he calls it. Oh, it'll be it'll be next summer before they finally take their grubby little fingers out of your life. That's what That's what you're really Oh and they've done such a great job, haven't they, with with all the mitigation measures in stopping the virus? Has it been amazing listening to all these people mass compliance? Highest it's ever been by far. Look what that did for us over the winter. Oh, it was magical, wasn't it. We had we had such a

great result. It's awful. And yet if we listen this time around, they promise us everything will be so much better. There's no you know, there's no h leeway whatsoever for individual choice here, because of course you're a threat to other people. It's like, well, isn't that interesting. They've created a narrative here where they can continue this forever if they want to. They have new variants, new strains of the virus. Maybe they we've gotten into the Maybe this

could be true. So let's build policy on its stage of the panic, the COVID panic that has been forced on all of us. Perfect example, where's the science on if you're vaccinated and or have already had and cleared the disease officially, you were tested, you had it, you got sick, you're better that you should still mask and quarantine. Well, it's because we haven't done massive specific studies for COVID

nineteen about how long you have immunity. But we know that based on all other science to date, based on all other data we have about vaccinations, you're going to be immune for quite some time, unless somehow this is different. But oh, the possibility is enough. Everyone still has to mask.

You know what this is really about. They realize that if they made the allowance for people who had gotten vaccinated not to mask, there'd probably be people who just say, you know what, I'm not going to ask any more period. And that's that's why, because because their explanation is absurd. Otherwise, oh you could, you can get the virus and spread the virus, but your body's already protected against it. Is that true of other viruses? Is that a common thing

that that occurs in science in medicine? No, but with this one maybe it is. That's what they tell you. So because they can't prove that their theory that goes against all other vaccination data and science for you know, for over well first vaccinations were around the ear eighteen hundreds, we're going to a couple hundred years, but certainly the last hundred years of modern medicine. And yeah, now they're telling you what we can't prove. I'm not wrong. So

wear your mask. And it's a symbol of all this stuff, all the restrictions, all that continued hell that they put people through. And to give you an idea of how how stupid they really are. Right, Remember I told detest and trace as a means of controlling the virus was stupid, and I was right. No one they could put any MD up against me any PhD. I said, how are you gonna do? This isn't about Oh but I look at slides under a microscope and I have an MD PhD. Mph.

It's just logic. You're gonna find hundreds of thousands of cases a day. You're gonna track all these people down, and so excuse me? Can you corn? And what will that even do? Can you quarantine? Please? Uh? No? Boop? What are you gonna send people with guns to everyone's house? Make them stay at home? Is this is this communist China? I know some Democrats wanted to be test and trace was a joke. Double masking was coming because masking did

not work sufficiently even with mass adoption. That is what happened in this country. So now it's double masking or better fitted masks, to which I just say, triple mask baby. We already saw there was a news story on NBC or maybe it was CNBC to talking about how effective triple masking would be. And sure enough, now some people are going to start doing that. So I knew that was going to happen. And there are so many of these these rules, these regulations that are idiotic. But if

you tell them that they yell at you. I'm amazed at how many people. I'm trying to give them back some autonomy, some freedom, some dignity, Get some of their dignity back that has been taken from them by the Fauciites. Got to be terrified or relatives. They told you to be afraid of your family members over Thanksgiving and Christmas. Remember every two weeks it was, oh my gosh, the

explosion from a Holidays. Now it's called wintertime. And there were more viruses spreading then, as is always the case, they wanted to avoid family members. There'll be a lot of people who don't die from COVID, but this was their last Christmas, or this was their last Thanksgiving, and if they loosened to fauci, they didn't spend it with family. Thanks fouch. And now they're talking about a test before you can get on for domestic domestic flights, a test

for COVID. Gee, that's not going to be a giant pain in the ass. What is it going to be three days before, two days before? When are you good? You know that there are a number of there are a number of people who are going to get false positives. That's just baked into the testing system because especially the way they were doing it before, with the amplification of the of the virus particles, with the way they were doing it was at such a sensitive level that it

would pick up old virus, dead virus, discarded virus. They've, I believe, begun to scale that back a little bit, and so now they're telling you if the test before you get on a plane, you could still get sick the day after you get on the plane. And also we're taking precautions on planes. I thought, plane, we're supposed to be pretty safe. What the heck happened? I thought if we were our masks on the plane, it's not that big a deal. It's an acceptable risk. This is

all about acceptable risk. And then the dumbest thing of all, but it's political. That's why I understand why they're doing it. It's not really about science. It's definitely not about keeping you safe. It's political. Where are we with domestic restrictions on travel that there's a possibility that that could even happen.

This is back to this piece in the Miami Herald where they're saying, quote, the Biden administration is considering whether to impose domestic travel restrictions, including on Florida, fearful that coronavirus mutations are threatening to reverse hard fought progress on the pandemic. By the way, the progress is, it's burning through our population, and we have vaccinations. That's the only

progress that's happening. We haven't contained. We didn't stop it. Obviously, outbreaks of the new variants, including a highly contagious one first identified in the United Kingdom, as well as others from South Africa and Brazil that scientists worry can evade existing vaccines, have lent urgency to a review of potential

travel restrictions within the United States. Discussions in the the administration over potential travel restrictions do not target a specific state, but focus on how to prevent the spread of variants that are surging in a number of states, including Florida and California. But oh, this was this was so interesting to see. You mean the place that we're this article

has been updated. I was going to say that they've been some of this language has been changed since I read it yesterday, the addition of California, and there everybody latched onto this and they said, hold on a second, because the initial headlines were just about Florida. They're going to have travel restrictions in place for Florida. How is that going to stop the virus. Let's just sit here for a second. This means that people they're trying to

test this one out. They're putting it out. There's kind of a trial balloon people in and around the Biden administration at the top level. But this means Fauci. Of course, Fauci's just sitting there like the little bureaucrat hacky is and he's talking to whomever on Biden's task force and probably Biden himself, and they're thinking, you know, Florence got these problems I'm hearing with the new strain, the new variant. You know, maybe we gotta do a little something about that.

Oh you mean you're going to isolate and perhaps even quarantine from travel one state in order to protect us all from the South African variant, which is not more deadly. They just say it's more transmissible. They don't know that it goes around any vaccinations. They have no proof of that. These are just theories. But you see, when they want to do something, a theoretical justification for it is enough.

Oh you can't travel the flora anymore. Why because we're not sure if the vaccines will work against this variant. That there's one hundred cases I think or two hundred cases of it in Florida. Okay, but it could the vaccine may well work against it. We don't know that. So what Oh yeah, but we gotta do we gotta take the precaution as if it's only in Florida or only in a few states. And then let's let's take a step back even further. How dumb are the people

in charge really? I mean, do not let the possibility that we are truly ruled by morons ever stray too far from your mind. Okay, you're gonna limit domestic domestic airline travel. Well, this thing exists in America called cars, and people go to other places, they go to other states, and they see other human beings. So unless you're going to do a full on statewide quarantine lockdown, no one in or out, what do you really going to accomplish?

And so it's a dumb idea top to bottom. It's it's an enormous and an enormous restriction of the rights of Americans to travel freely between the states. And I know they haven't done it, but the fact that they're even considering it just shows they would love nothing more than an opportunity. They'd love nothing more than an opportunity to take a big shot at Florida. Because the data,

the data is there now last twelve months. You don't You're you're picking where you're going to be just based on the on the economy and the COVID Response'd rather be in New York or Florida. Rather be in New Jersey or Florida. Rather be in California or Florida. You get on the list. It's pretty clear they've got to do something about this. They can't, they can't allow this narrative to continue because it's a threat to their continued

p hour. And then there's just one more thing, back to this other point, when do you think this really stops? I want you to really keep that in mind, because if possibilities are enough for infringements on your liberty and on your day to day life, you don't think they can always conjure up another possible strain, another possible variant. Libs have no problem with this, They have no issue at all. They like this stay at home zoom life

They like wearing the mask. They like having working class people out there being the ones that are actually exposing themselves to the virus. Will they just stay at home and type in their computers with their mask on? Oh my gosh, they're fine with it. They think the mask is no but they always say, oh, it's like seat belt wearing. It's like, really, do you have to wear a seat belt when you go for a walk alone in the woods with your dog? Because that's what these

idiot libs want. Now. I worry. I worry this country has has lost, has lost it guts that our population we're just we're too we're just too soft and and uh, you know, as long as we're to borrow from it's the souls and eats and lines. As long as we're safe and warm and fed, it's all the same to us. Doesn't really matter. You know, whatever they tell you to do, we'll just do it. You know, it'd be one of the bad people. I'm amazed. I amazed to one of

my fellow Americans have willing to go through. I try my own little private acts of protest against this, and eventually the system overwhelmed me too. Won't silence me, I still speak about it, but I'm not going to get arrested for being the one person in Manhattan who refuses to wear a mask. Right, that's it's not worth it. Everyone else around here is like, oh my gosh, he's killing grandma. They've all been brainwashed and they can't. Another

problem here is they can't disassociate this from Trump. They view this as a Trump thing. I could care less what Trump says or does about, or did about the mass situation or the virus in general. This is about right now. They just don't want to give up the control. You're in the freedom hunt. Thanks for listening to The Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get the latest from Buck at buck sexton dot com. It's nearly a unanimous opinion from

health officials the schools have not been particularly high. Sources transmission that they have been safe places for adequate ventilation and social distancing, That schools have been safe, and so many American parents, of course, want their children to be

back there. The Biden demonstration has caught some real criticism on this that they seem to be not living up to the goals that President Biden first set out, and Yes Press secondary Stocky suggested that they're one day a week, that that would first of all the sure number of schools, but they're talking about narrowed that it would be the younger kids as opposed to the older kids, and that

alienated some parents. And then that yes, that one day a week for a certain percentage of students would be enough to hit their threshold. She walked this back a little bit yesterday. She said they're still pressing forward. That she acknowledged that they that they want this is still a major centerpiece of their plan, but it does seem like right now that they're behind on that while and

that's something that they have taken criticism for. As we see schools like Chicago, cities like Chicago and Philadelphia have real issues, and there's a sense that they're being reluctant to challenge the teachers unions to put those teachers back in classrooms. There's not a sense, there's the obvious reality that the teachers unions are just using this for maximum leverage for their adults at the expensive kids. That's it. That's it. Democrats need them, Democrats want their donations, want

their support. And remember it's not even just the federal level. It's really important at the state and local level too. The whole Democrat machinery doesn't want to touch teachers unions, although they're in the back pocket of the Democrat party, or rather the Democrat parties in the back pocket of the unions. But why is this so important to look at? Here we have put in front of us the most clear possible data. We've run the experiment. We have private, private,

and prochial schools have been opened for months. They're fine. All the data from America, from Europe, from every country in the world. Children are fine. There's no real risk. Democrats won't act on it. Democrats won't act on it. This is the if you needed proof that they are unreasonable and acting in bad faith on COVID nineteen, here is your clear as it can possibly be proof that that is what is going on. You know, I think

some folks are just coming to this recognition now. For a lot of the rest of us, it's hard not to say, yeah, I told you so. This was never about protecting the kids. This was never about keeping you safe either. For a lot of Democrats, the shutdown of the schools was one thing and one thing, only using the kids as hostages to get adults easier, better paying, lazier jobs. That's it that they're unfiable from courtesy of their taxpayer paychecks. That's what's really going on. You're listening

to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Make sure you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app or wherever you get your podcasts. What should we make now of what we've seen so far and what we're going to see in this impeachment trial. I'm trying to only take the important takeaways and give them to you folks. So let's bring in our friend Ned Ryan. He's the founder of American Majority. Tell us what he's seeing. Ned. How are you doing, buddy, Hey, I'm good Buck. Good to

be with you. And you know, it's interesting times we live in. But I was thinking yesterday as I watched Ted lu and Eric Swalwell, you know, I guess if you're gonna have a proper circus, you've got to have a paray to clowns. And so one after one of those clowns came up, and you know it's the big lie.

I mean, this is the thing Buck, that I think people, I hope understand and that all of this neither impeachment was based in fact, right, there are no facts involved with the first one, and there's no facts really involved with this one. And it based on a big line. And you know that Democrats know it too, because they edited out three very keywords in their video peaceful and patriotic, when they were trying to to show in this video

that somehow Trump incited violence and sedition and insurrection. But of course they eded out three very key words in that. It's all a big life based off them trying to pin down President Trump on on somehow inciting all of this when in fact it wasn't insurrection at worst, it was it was a ride of some really stupid people. And again we're finding out facts two buck, this was premeditated people that there there now is evidence that there were planning being a month ahead of time to do

this at the Capitol. And in fact, we now know that those pipe poblems were actually planted at the DNC and the RNC the night before. So all of this is a big line. And my supposition in all of this book is it's a big to cover the big rig. Right, if you're if you're distracted by this, you're not focused on that Time magazine article talking about the big rig

of what they actually did in twenty twenty. So this is all kind of, I think, part of their plan to distract people because they're not they're never going to convict them. Tell us one more Republicans go ahead, They're going to convictim and they already said it was unconstitutional

to continue on with this trial. Tell us about the the Time magazine twenty twenty article that was celebrating I mean, you're somebody who understands the inner workings of elections and what actually goes on here from messaging to ballot boxes. I mean, you're you're somebody who knows that top to bottom. What were they celebrating about how they stacked the deck in twenty twenty in favor of you know, in favor

of the Democrats. Yeah, yeah, no, I would encourage people if you've not read Molly Ball's article at Time magazine about the secret campaign to say the twenty twenty elections, which of course they demolished electoral integrity to to fortify the election. That was one of the most curious or welliam words I've seen in recent times. They weren't rigging the election, but they were fortifying it. But it really

was the big rig. It was collusion between big tech, big labor unions, Chamber of Commerce, who has always been they've always been problematic. They've always been more corporatist than capitalist. And obviously the big tech not only playing a role in basically stopping the free flow of information right censoring the New York Post, Google not really letting some of this information that would be damaging to Joe Biden come out.

And on top of that, you know, I've talked about this some, but people need to be what Mark Zuckerberg did with the Center for Tech and Civic Life, in which he dropped three hundred and fifty million into a nonprofit that then was used to paid private funds used to paid election officials in these battleground states, specifically in blue counties and blue cities, to boost the blue vote Democratic vote. I mean literally by a margin of ten to one buck. We know on Wisconsint thanks to the

Amistead project that it was consint alone. In the Center for Tech and Civic Life money was basically forty seven dollars per vote inside of blue counties and Blue cities versus more to four to seven dollars in Republican counties.

So what they were doing in this Time article, and I have to tell you, when I first read it last week, book, I was torn between feelings of completely infuriated because they completely destroyed I believe, in my mind, and are not proud of it, Americans' ability to truly self governed. Right. They're kind of done with democracy. Right, We're not going to let this happen in such a way. We're going to manipulate it and rig it to get the election results. We want to make sure that the

great outsider doesn't win again. And so you start to really understand and they're proud of it, and so you're infuriated at the same time. But the thing that concerns me they only brag about these things that they think they've won. Right, people that are this braise and think they've somehow pulled it off with the American people are too stupid to understand what they actually did, or just

simply not going to pay attention. So I would encourage everybody go read that Time article, and I hope you have the same feeling I did, complete completely infuriated by what they did in manipulating our twenty twenty elections. We're speaking of NED Ryan, founder of American Majority NED. I also have to say that it seems as this impeachment farce continues on with this in this trial this week.

There are very important things that are not known publicly, and I do not believe are known by members of the Senate who are supposed to be adjudicating this whole thing. And the first one that comes to mind is how is it that we were told? And I I am somebody who fell into this category, we were told something as straightforward as a police officer was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher. That was the report, right given,

given the violence. There was violence involving cops. They did hit them, and you know, there were there were scuffles and there was assaults on officers. But we were told that somebody was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher, or at least was hey with a fire extinguisher and died as a result of the injury. And now it's quite clear that that is not what happened. How could

we have I mean, that has been the singular. That was the murder that was supposed to be the basis of the violent insurrection narrative, because other than that you have what's clearly a riot. You have people running around taking photos, being idiots, breaking the law. Should be punished, no question. But it seems pretty important that we get the officer sick nick story correct. But yeah, we don't

have it. We don't know, no, And I think I would encourage people to read two articles that have been done on this very specific topic. One is Julie Kelly's An American Greatness. I believe it either rand yesterday or the day before, but Julie Kelly an American Greatness and it Revolvernews Darren Beatty. I'm not sure if Darren was the actual author of it, but there's another good piece on this that Revolver News about the exact same issue

in which this was pushed. This was, you know, this officer setting it was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher. This is murder, et cetera. And now they're realizing, yeah, that those aren't really the facts. There's a lot of questions about that. There are a lot of questions about obviously the premeditation. FBI's knowledge of this. Apparently they knew

it beforehand. You know, Mark Meadows came out the other day and said Trump realized that with that many people in DC and a lot of people coming in, that we should have more National Guard. You've made a request to have more National Guard in the city before January sixth. Mayor Bowser said no. I mean, there's a lot of different details that need to be addressed and understood. But again again I go back to my earlier point. Neither of these impeachments or the trials had anything to do

with facts. And the ultimate purpose, and I wrote about this at American Greatness yesterday, is to basically say that any descent to our narrative, any descent to our status quo, to our system, will not be tolerated. We will punish you financially, your reputation, we will shut you down. Now distance is not patriotic. In fact, it's seditious, and it's in your insurrectionist and in fact you're even a domestic terrorist. Descent will not be allowed at how dare you question us?

But the other thing, too, Buck really quick that that's kind of fascinating to me. People that really think they have one, that really feel confident about this, don't do this right. There's almost an element of fear and some of the things that they're doing trying to get Trump disqualified from running again, trying to shut down seventy four plus a million people and saying, you know you made

a bad choice. We're going to take away your right to choose any candidate moving forward, and if you choose the wrong one, they'll be they'll be consequences for you. But there's almost this element of fear of what they're doing, because I don't know how confident they really actually feel, because they really had to do a lot of things to kind of rig to get the results they wanted to, and it doesn't feel like they're terribly confident in their position right now. I mean, that's at least one of

my thoughts. Ned. I also think that everyone should should

be aware. In my estimation, what's going on here is that they're they're setting a narrative of events with this Senate trial that is actually, in many ways more more to create the basis for steps that have nothing to do with this right, to create the basis for enhanced counter terrorism based surveillance of Trump supporters, to create a narrative of of of kicking people off of social media who are Trump supporters because of violence policies and that

that essentially this what the what the the Democrats Senate is doing right now, or Democrats on the Senator doing right now, is creating the excuse for the abuse of Trump supporters that's going to occur in the rest of society, and they're going to point to this trial and say, see, those were the facts presented. Yeah. I mean, I think we're in a very dangerous period in American politics in which they are trying to, for all intents and purposes,

dehumanize a very significant percentage in population. Right if you can say these people were insurrectionists, they're domestic terrorists, they're Unamerican. If you can say that and actually convince enough of the American people, well maybe they're right, maybe these people are very dangerous. Well, then it lays the ground work.

You'd be able to justify what you're going to do next, you know, and be able to punish them, whether it's censored them, whether you know it's it's concerning you don't even really want to think about where they're headed. But I know this is the first step in a very dangerous path. If you want to be able to do certain things to people, you have to first dehumanize them. And then once you dehumanize them in a certain segment of the population's eyes, you can do whatever you want

to them moving forward, deeply, troubling, deeply concerning Ned. Ryan is a found of American Majority and Ned to that end. You're a guy who is in the political trenches and you're trying to actually organize and mobilize people for constitutionalism, conservatism. What do we do now? I keep getting this question, and it's one that I think there's no there's no single answer. It's really an evolving answers as more situations

arise here. But what do we say to people right now who are feeling exactly what I think you and I are, which is that this is a precarious moment

in American politics? How do we go forward? Well, first of all, I think people need to fully understand what they did last year, and one of our big projects with American Majority this year is Electoral Integrity Project, in which we're going to be spelling out here's what they did in twenty twenty, using the Time article, using the Honest Dead Projects Report, using some of our other research that we pulled together to really explain to people, here's

what happened in twenty twenty, we can never let it happen again. Right with universal mail in ballots, twice as many absentee ballots cast this time around than there were in twenty sixteen, a lot of questions about the validity of a lot of those votes. So explain to people what took place, and then reform items. And I'm telling people what you need to be focused on over the next eighteen months, because I really do feel this buck

we've got one shot at the death star. When you see some of the things that Nancy Pelosi and these people are doing to kind of entrench some of the stuff they got away with last year and turn it into law, I think we've got one shot at it between now and twenty twenty two. We got to do electoral reform. And there's a whole list of electoral reforms that we're going to be going through, whether it's dealing with absentee ballot laws, state legislators actually knowing their rights

and you can't skirt state constitutions. We're going to try and clean voter roles, dirty day that leads to dirty elections, and then encourage people as they find out the right bills that are being pushed in these state legislatures to actually call and lobby their elected officials on that to make sure reform happens and at the same time to

take it another step book. I think some people that are listening and people that we're going to be training moving forward this year, I'm gonna challenge you gotta run for county clurk, you gotta run for county registrar. You gotta run through these municipal level positions that have oversight into elections. Some of them might even actually end up running for Secretary of State or other positions that have

to do with the electoral process. We cannot allow what happened in twenty twenty to take place again because it really was hollowed out the American right to self governance. It was manipulated. Laws were broken and skirted. State constitutions were skirted. And we've got to be aware of what took place and then followed these action items and get it done before twenty twenty two. And I have to tell you, but there are twenty seven Republican governors out there.

There are twenty three trifectas in which we have in the state, the governor, the state Senate, and the state House. If we do not have meaningful legislation in at least those twenty three states, you know, I'm gonna question Republicans intelligence on this issue because they have to address this, and if they don't, Republicans, I don't think they might never win a national election again, And if it gets really bad, they'll never win an election at any level

inside of a battle Brown state. And one last quick one for you, what do you think the former president's thoughts are on running again Donald Trump? I think the real test is twenty twenty If he wants to be the kingmaker and really shows some political clout in twenty twenty two and pick us a series of House races and Senate races and do rallies and raise money and have a huge impact, right, a huge winning percentage in twenty twenty two, I think it sets the stage for

running again in twenty twenty four. But for me, the twenty twenty two elections and his role in his impact on those elections really are indicative of what he'll do in twenty twenty four. Ned Ryan of American Majority, Everybody Ned always a pleasures. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Follow Buck on Facebook Instagram and Twitter. I just want to know as this played out for hours and hours and Senators, we're listening to this and watching it, some

of it for the first time. Can you imagine can you imagine one of them sitting in the gallery with his feet up reading magazines or unrelated material during this unbelievable full presentation of what happened to our US capital that day. Well, you have people that are clearly unfit and that was Josh Holly, and unfit to serve in the United States Capital, in the United States Senate. And of course, if you're Josh Holly, you actually are the

person who led the insurrection. You're the person most responsible other than Donald Trump, for that insurrection. You're the person most responsible or police officer being beaten to death. You're the person most responsible for the cop killing, for the cop beating, for the abusing. It is Josh Holly who Mitch McConnell begged, begged to not do what he did. Do we ever get to hold people accountable for lying about this situation or not. Officer sick Nick was not

beaten to death. That's the latest reporting we have as of me going on air right now. Was not beaten to death. I believe he had a medical condition. They don't know. Just by the way, Still a tragedy and still horrible that any officers and there were officers assaulted on Capitol Hill that should never have happened. But I think the facts are supposed to matter, especially in the context of a impeachment trial. But they just keep repeating

this thing. And Josh Holly is the most responsible. Josh Holly's responsible for somebody hitting a police officer with their fists outside of the capitolil. Why is he responsible for that? I mean, isn't then Joe Scarborough and all the other total phony elitist frauds over at MSNBC. Aren't they responsible for every business burned down, every officer punched, attacked, spit on, feces thrown in their face, bottles of urine smashed over them, happening all summer long. Not a few times, not even

dozens of times, hundreds of times. See responsible for that? Oh? I see. We have a very we have a very different set of rules apparently for Democrats and Republicans. Isn't that well, it's exactly what we expect. There's there's no difference, there's no change at all and what we would assume. This is a troubling time in American politics because as I as I see this, I can tell that this

isn't really even about removing Trump. This is about using the so called insurrection as the justification for doing truly awful on American things, using government force as well as corporate force in the private sector, to attack people, to ruin people, to emmiserate them for their wrong think. They seek to emiserate us for our wrong think. That that's what's really going on with all of this. It doesn't matter that they're not going to get a conviction of

Trump in the end, don't you see. They're presenting all of this as evidence and as propaganda, and so they can then take action because they will have convinced so many Democrats that this was an insurrection and it was awful, and that the Trump supporters or terrorists. I'm worried about what they're gonna do in six months or three months with the passage of legislation to quasi criminalized conservatism. This

is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Joined the conversation and message buck on Facebook, Instagram, or email Team Bucket iHeartMedia dot Com. He may read it on the show. I sat down with Member of the House Intelligence Committee Devin Newness yesterday. I had a chance to ask him about what's going on here with all the unfolding craziness with the senators talking about insurrection and how Trump is directly

responsible and all that stuff. But he pointed out that there's there's a bigger trend here of yes, lies from Democrats, but also the abuse of institutions, and he raised some other questions. I wanted to share some of this with you. I think you need to hear this because here's a guy who, as you remember Devin Newness, at the very beginning of the Russia collusion madness, he was a voice saying, hold on, we need to actually get the facts straight here.

There's something not right. They're not telling you the truth. There was FISA abuse, there was surveillance of the Trump campaign. He was that guy, and they said, of course, terrible things about him as a result of this. The media was slandering him all the time, but Newness stood his ground and he's really one of the unsung heroes of

fighting back against the Russia collusion madness. He should be far We should have a there should have been a much bigger, I think surge of public recognition about just what an important service Devin Newness provided by bringing that true to the forefront. Well, he also in looking at the Russia collusion insanity, is somebody who really understands what has gone on in our intelligence agencies. And I wanted to share with you this is what he told me yesterday.

Play one. Well, it's been dark days for America for five years since our intelligence agencies were corrupted as far as late twenty fifteen when they began effectively, for lack of a better definition, spine on the Republican Party. I know they'll say hard Page or Trump or Man of Ford or whatever the hell it is. At the end of the day, this has been going on for five years.

You had the first so there was an impeachment. It's basically the continued coup, and I think what you're seeing now is essentially the grand finale of it all, where they want to get sixty seven votes the left because they don't want Donald Trump to be able to run again. Now, it's kind of interesting because you know, very seldom, I think only once or twice in US history has a president actually one lost and then come back and one again.

So they're really afraid of Donald Trump. It's kind of interesting. That's the only possible reason they're impeaching it. That's the only possible reason they're impeaching. Well, I actually think there are even more reasons. I think that this is setting the groundwork for an enormous effort from the left to go on offense against Conservatism. You know, we give them through this election process. They now have power. They have

legislative authority, they have executive branch authority. But it's all supposed to be one done in good faith. You're not supposed to be persecuting your fellow Americans with that power, which they will certainly they're already doing, and they'll certainly do more of that. But beyond that, you're you're also not supposed to try to structurally change the country so

that you stay in power forever. Then you start to get something more along the lines of you know, one man, one vote, one time, right, this is the last free and fair election. And they would argue this and say, oh, but if you're changing the structure and you're doing it legally, then you know, all's fair in love and war. But

I mean amnesty is essentially ending something that had been illegal. Right, if you give amnesty to twelve or fifteen or twenty million, or whatever many millions of people it is, you're just deciding, well, the law isn't really the law anymore because it benefits one political party. Right, the law isn't really the law. And when you think about DC statehood, that would be another way that they would be structurally changing things. You

look at add A Puerto Rico. These are the kinds of moves that they're thinking about, and it's just a question whether they can execute on them. But they're hoping to destroy the Republican Party once and for all. They don't like the checks and balances aspect of government. They don't like that there are there's a two party system where you always have some check, some control on the power of whoever's actually in authority at any one point

in time. But the intelligence agencies being used as weapons in this whole process is deeply disconcerting. And I've been telling everyone just wait until the social media companies decide that they want to get even more in on this one. Social media companies are gonna they essentially have chat logs, searches, everything from everybody in existence, stretching back for decades now, I mean certainly stretching back for ten or fifteen years for all of us, probably more like twenty years. And

for anybody who's continuing to use them. They're giving them all this data. That's a lot of information that these socials, these are private companies, and they're already selling your data. But what if they decide that they want to do more than just sell it? You know, how how long do you really think it is before you have a Republican presidential candidate who suddenly, you know, naughty messages that he was writing his his don't it could even be

his wife. I mean, I don't think people should be outraged about that or anything, but you know, I don't know, but whatever embarrassing stuff. But again, writing your wife naughty messages, I don't think that should be embarrassing at all. It's your wife. But something else, something bad, whatever, it may be, something that's but some private issue, and and that's splashed across the pages of all the major or splash across I should say, the websites and everything out there in

the news news ecosystem. They have enormous, enormous authority in political discussions at these social media companies, and there you add that to the intelligence communities willingness to work with the media, and you start to say, hold on a second. If face Book, CNN, and the CIA are all against you,

you're gonna have a really tough time. With the way our society currently functions, You're gonna have a really tough time getting the kind of political power you need to break the tech oligarch stranglehold on our society, to push back against the authoritarian democrat madness, and to counter the

lies of the corporate media. Right that those when when you think about it, those three entities, corporate media, social media, and intelligence agencies all worked against actively worked against Donald Trump, against this campaign, and against the MAGA movement. That's just a matter. That's a fact. You had the suppression of the Hunter Biden story by social media right before the twenty twenty election. You had the corporate media's concoction of

the Russia collusion ridiculousness. You have the intelligence agencies feeding the corporate media everything from the General Flynn phone call transcript to all kinds of things you can point to from Russia Russia Gate, feeding that to the media. It was like a big self looking ice cream cone, and they all were working against Donald Trump. You know, they're all now working in favor of Joe Biden. That's tremendously

powerful and it's something we have to be very concerned about. Anyway, back to this Devin Newness interview that I just did yesterday on the First TV, which I really hope you will all check out. It's a free app, the First TV. Just download it. You can watch it anytime. Hold the Line is the Hold the Line with Buck Saxton as a show, doing a show every day, but you can watch it on demand, So just watch whenever you want to. Certainly watch my opening monologue. All of you listening to

this check it out. But here's Newness on another and this is going to get very contentious. But here he is talking about what happened on January sixth. He's raising some questions Play two. Of course, I think that the president's lawyers need to do a very good job making the case here and look at it shouldn't be very hard to prove the fact of the matter is is Donald Trump's own words don't show that he was trying

to lead an insurrection. There's no hard evidence. Right, there's no intelligence, and in fact the intelligence shows both before there were several groups. The FBI knew about it. They opened up that information to the US Congress. At the end of the day, Nancy Pelosi is effectively the mayor. So some but the Capitol Police wanted more security. The Sergeant of arms wanted more security. I knew they needed more security. And I'm just the top Republican on the

Intelligence Committee. I have no power. I find found out that morning for some reason, there was no fencing put in place. The military was offered to come in that the request was for them to come in. Somebody killed that. Now, who could that possibly be? It has to be Speaker Pelosi, and so that should be. Now, we don't have the hard evidence of that, because of course we can't put

her or her staff on the stand. But when you match up the timelines, for example, that there were pipe bombs placed the night before, So should we get answers? Can we get answers to this? Doesn't it really matter if the riot was planned in advance? Doesn't that completely undercut the Donald Trump ordered this thing. Incitement to insurrection is not saying something. And then months later people get upset and they remember your words and they do something bad.

Incitement to insurrection is hey, big angry mob, go burn down that building. That's incitement to insurrection. And so already we have Trump saying peacefully, have your voice is heard. But add to that the clear evidence so far that this was planned in advance of any Trump's statement whatsoever, and the incitement to insurrection charge just falls apart. But also what about this lack of a demand for additional security. I think that's interesting. I think that's not something that

we should just we should just forget easily. Why did that happen? Remember, Devin Newness was the guy asking the questions at the beginning of Russia collusion. He's, you know, as a member of Congress on the House Intelligence Committee. He's somebody was asking the questions that the media was going into fits of rage about. Now Here he is asking more questions, and they're obviously going to try to stifle, shut down and attack in response to it. I think

we should get answers. I think Devin Newness has proven that he's a guy who sees what's going on and isn't afraid to push for the truth. And these days that is a rarity. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast, follow fuck on Facebook, Instagram and Gina Corrano fired from the Mandalorian. What is the world coming to? I'm gonna say I like miss Corono. I thought she was very I thought she was good in the role um. I

think she's got a lot of screen presence. I also think that, you know, if if we're going to have females on TV who are warriors, I think that it's just it's more even in a fantasy situation of of fiction. It's it's you know, Gina Corano, like kicking some bud is a little bit more credible than you know, one hundred one hundred pound runway model who's like doing fly kicks everywhere. I'm just saying, I mean, in general, I think that's I know, people oh, they get mad Amuna said,

it's I'm sorry, It's true, all right. If you've ever ever seen, you know the difference between a hundred pound male and a two hundred and twenty pound male, you know in a wrestle matt and wrestling match or a fight, you understand the malee anyway, But the point here is that she got fired from The Mandalorian. For well, just the usual cancel culture nonsense. Lucas Film said they got rid of her because of social media posts. Now what was it that she had made? Oh? She so this

is one thing that I love about her. She made fun of masks. She mocked mask wearing. Oh no, well, I don't know. I mean, she just had something. She shared a photo apparently where there were a lot of people with a whole lot of masks on, or there was a person with a whole bunch of masks on. And isn't that just be an extra safe isn't isn't eight years? Isn't I'm sorry? Isn't eight masks rather safer

than one mask? Why not? So? The Hollywood reporter here writes, this is not the first time Krano, who played former Rebel Alliance soldier Kara Dune on The Mandalorian, has been the focus of social media are for her political comments. Last November, she issued contentious tweets and which she mocked mask wearing and which she falsely suggested voter fraud occurred in the twenty twenty election. They have been looking for a reason to fire her for two months, and today

was the final straw. A source with knowledge of Lucasfilms, thinking yeah, that's just their press, that's just their own press shop putting that out there, but not taking credit for that's all that is. Corona was an MMA star. She's appeared in Deadpool, Fast and Furious six, and I think she did what was it she she compared? She posted something about about Nazis and comparing how the Nazis

were dehumanizing their neighbors. And isn't that sort you know, isn't that similar to something that's going on right now. Pedro Pascal, who is very woke, so he's of course protected. You know, this week he was expressing support on social media for his expressing support on social media for his transgender transistor on Instagram. Anyway, Pascal compared American treatment of migrant detention to Auschwitz a couple of years ago, with photos,

the whole thing. No problem, that's fine. And he's also as you know, he's in the Mandalorian, he's the he's the main Mandalorian guy. You know, I've had a couple of friends already that have sent me just they've screenshot

unto me, they're cancelations of Disney, other Disney subscription. I don't have a Disney subscription, but I would cancel it if I did, because we either we either hit them in the bottom line, we either actually make choices that affect the finances of these places, or they keep doing it and the left keeps getting their way. That's it. Everything else is just chattering. Oh oh, maybe they'll get nice here, Oh maybe they'll stop. It's not true. Yeah.

The problem is that Corono compared being a Republican to the treatment that the way that Nazis have, yeah, to the way that the Nazis dehumanized people around them, something like that. I'm looking for the actual post now. Pedro Pascal, who plays the Mandalorian on Disney Plus, was not fired for this post on Instagram where the US oh comparing Trump supporters to Nazis. Actually I'm sorry, I mean, look, this is it doesn't even you look at this. We

all know there's a huge double standard. We all know that you can get away with all kinds of stuff being left wing. Can I just say, I mean, you know, Marilyn Manson, it's come out now, is like a sick, abusive maniac. Is this a surprise to anybody? This guy is First of all, his music is awful. It's not even music, it's just ear trash. It's garbage. There's no you know, this was this was the music that people

that honestly had like emotional problems were drawn to. And you know, the guy's like, I'm the devil basically, and it's a surprise to find out that he's abusive to women. I mean, I look around, as it does anyone. This guy's is like a sick, weirdo obviously who stands for really bad things. But he was, you know, it was sort of he's associated with the left, with that sort of libertine nihilism of the left, so they let him get away with stuff for a long time. You're listening

to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Make sure you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Our friend Ben Ferguson now joins us. He is a talk radio host. He's got a podcast, the Ben Ferguson Show. He's coming to us from the great state of Texas. Mister Ferguson, what's going on? How are you brother? Are you ready to trout for the NBA because apparently they're gonna get some players pretty soon. You should be. I know you got a great jump shot.

I'm actually in my day I will tell you I was a decent little point guard in eighth grade, but I'll go beyond that now. Yeah, my career ended at high school level, So that probably tells you my skill set. What's going on with you? You know what if you if you identify is a female, we could probably get you a good salary in the w NBA. Well, apparently there's no difference between male and female athletes now according to the Biden administration. So there's that. But I want

to ask about the NBA anthem. Tell me this what national anthem? Why has there been this back and forth? Mark Cuban said it wasn't going to happen, and people there was outrage, and now now the NBA says it is going to happen. What's going on here? So people need to understand the real story here, which is not

being reported. Mark Cuban did not play the national anthem for his first thirteen games this season, right, so it was already implemented, and they think they were just trying to move it along to act like, hey, this has already happened. It's not a new decision, right, you guys are just now noticing it, so there'd be less pressure politically. It would be like, hey, this has not been going on. No one's been freaking out. Now you guys are given

a snake outrage. Well then the backlash went nationwide, obviously very quickly, and the NBA then steps in within twenty four hours and realize this is a massive mistake and that people are going to run away from their league and it's going to alienate people now when they need fans more than ever. And so Adam Silvan NBA basically says, all right, we're gonna throw Mark Cuban under the bus and say to Mark Cuban, no, you are going to

play the national anthem. Here's the part of the story that needs to be report on that is not Adam silver We know spoke with Mark Cuban and gave the okay to Mark Cuban to not play the national anthem. That's a fact. We know the NBA gave permission okay to Mark Cuban to make the initial decision. It was only after the public outrage apparently did the NBA say, oops, we made a bad decision, but we're not going to

be blamed for it. We're gonna look like we're pro America and we'll throw Mark Cuban under the bus us in the Dallas Mavericks and make him look bad. The second part of the story, which is also I think been completely missed by ESPN and all these other quote sports networks that should be doing their job, is why

did Mark Cuban make this decision? The only reason why Mark Cuban made his decisions because he saw it as an opportunity to reach out to players that were disgruntled where they currently are playing because of owners that are conservative. If you don't believe me, look exactly what happened to the Houston Rockets. They lost their number one player, James Hardens, who virtually refused to play basketball anymore because the owner of the Rockets is a conservative, a donor to the

Republican Party and a donor to Donald Trump. And he said, all right, I'm not playing for you anymore. You're going to be forced to trade me. And I think what Cuban pretty much said is I have no scruples, I don't have any pride in the United States of America.

I want to win ballgames, so I'm going to be the first guy to say the hell with the national anthem, and then I can go after the best players in the league and say, hey, guys, you want to your black lives matter, You're you're in you know you're one of these players. You want to have a voice, you want to kneel. How about this, We don't even play the national anthem in our games. You want to come to my team, Get out of the Rockets, get out of whatever X summer teams is around the country. They

have quote conservative ownership. So this was nothing more than a play for Cuban to get better talent. The NBA approved it, the backlash happened, and then the NBA said, oops, sorry, we'll throw you under the bus, Cuban, and we'll save face,

even though they actually approved the move originally. One question I have though, is if this is Cuban using a policy of wokeness at the expense of the anthem to try to get top players who would not want to be as you said, at conservative teams like the Houston Robert you know, quote conservative teams like the Houston Rockets wouldn't some of the woke players won't the anthem to play, so they could make a scene during it, or you know, or is it they actually prefer to not have to

sit through that at all because the anthem upsets them or what? What are what are the dynamics here? I look, I think we're the players, and I've got a couple of buddies that play in the NBA, and I asked them, you know, kind of off the record, dude, what do you guys do? Most guys just get annoyed by it. So it's it's it's in the way now, right of playing the game. It's a waste of their time. They want to walk out there play basketball and then all of a sudden they got to sit there and do

this thing. So now they you know, they do the kneeling and disrespect it and the and the The other part that just drives me insane about this issue is do not forget that the American players stood for the Chinese national anthem and nolt for the American national anthem within the last year when they were playing games overseas, right, So so don't don't forget that that this is this is how ridiculous these players actually are. But I think they look at the national anthem is basically I can't

stand it. I don't like it. Screw this country, right, and it's and it's history because we're we don't because that's what we've been told to say from Black Lives Matter, etc. And so now they just want it gone. And I think Cuban saw that opportunity to connect with those players on that level by doing this, and then you saw the NBA realize, Okay, this is maybe going too far

right now. I would suspect in the next couple of years, though, that the NBA will stop playing the national anthem because so many of the players clearly want that to happen. That's that's pretty astonishing. How's the NBA? We're speaking of? Ben Ferguson, by the way, host of the Ben Ferguson podcast, does great stuff. You should definitely check him out. Politics, sports, culture, you name it, Ben. How has the NBA been doing? Given? I mean, I thought that all the BLM stuff over

the summer. I look, I don't watch anymore, and I never was a big watcher, to be fair, I shouldn't say never, that's not true. I haven't been somebody who watched much NBA since I'd say the last ten or fifteen years. But that's said. I used to watch and occasionally would watch it on the TV. Now no, I have no interest whatsoever. Have they had a real drop in ratings? I mean, is there is there a wokeness penalty that the NBA has paid already? I would say yes,

But how big it is we don't know. Because what we've learned from about sports is one thing, and that is if you can't attend a game, If you can't go to a game, you're way less likely to get engaged emotionally with that team during the season. You've seen it with the basketball ratings in the NCAA. We've seen

it with baseball. We've seen it with football. Look at the Super Bowl ratings went down significantly, and you would think that this year they would have been up the Super Bowl ratings because you had a a very popular player in Tom Brady on one side of the ball, a very popular team that won the Super Bowl last year in Kansas City, and this would have been a game where right everybody is on lockdown, everybody's at home.

You would have assumed the ratings would have been through the roof because you had a captive crowd that was stuck at home with COVID lockdowns, and they would have watched the game that did not happen because people aren't investing Moore. Now, I think what Cuban, for example, going back to his decision, is he was betting. I think

on the long game here. Hey, once the fans come back, if I get rid of the national anthem and I can get some of these James Harden players to defect and come play for me and I'm winning, then my fans will come back faster than anybody else's fans because I'm winning the games, and I can capitalize off of that and make money back quickly by doing this calculated decision.

Mark Cuban is not an idiot. I've done some TV with him, done radio with him before, He's been on my show, and Mark Cuban is a guy that doesn't make decisions based on ignorance. This was a calculated decision discussed with the NBA, discussed with the commissioner to get better players quickly so that when we come out of lockdown, maybe the fans would be just so ready to get out and do something again right, to get back to normality, to get back to watching, that he would capitalize faster

than anybody else. And he's a smart guy. But but but to be clear, the guy doesn't really care about this country. And I'm talking about from a patriarch standpoint. And the proof of it is if he's if he really thought this the right move, then he would have fired the American Airlines from being all over his building. Because the word American is on every cup of the American Airline Center. It's on every seat, it's on every ticket, it's on every all their websites and all their merchandise.

It's on the side of the building, it's on the roof, and the word American is on everything. So it don't don't don't be disguised by this guy and think that it's not a money decision. And if it was about if you know, if this wasn't about money for him, and it was about you know, not liking this country or a patriarch issue, how would you keep American on the side of your building. He makes money off that, he could gets the national anthem and make more money,

he thought, and that's why did it. Ben. I'm I'm somebody that tries to take a perspective of of well, there's what's happening here. I wanted to transition us to the lockdowns in the COVID situation for a moment, because that's what's happening in New York. And I know that's different from what's happening in other places across the country. But I'm here in New York City. I know you're you're down in Texas, but you also spend a lot of time in Memphis. You own a great barbecue place.

When I'm told in Memphis, Tennessee, yeah, man, I'm gonna I'm gonna come check out. I I have high brisket standards, I will say, because you actually can get pretty good brisket in Brooklyn. But I'm sure your barbecue is gonna be fantastic. But how is it going, you know, in Tennessee,

in Texas with with COVID lockdowns? Because I just I'm amazed that more places in the country aren't just just fed up with all the nonsense, with all the you know, now it's double mask and maybe there's gonna be flight restrictions. You know, it's one thing for people in New York to go along with this. Our Texans and Tennessee's just kind of okay with it or what no and what you have now is you're having these big grand battles. I'll give you example, my hometown of Memphis. It's the liberal,

most liberal city in Tennessee. Nashville come second, right, but Memphis is hardcore liberal. I'll give you example of how liberal it is. You remember the guy that the congressman, the guy that was eating a greasy bucket of chicken KFC. Steve Cohen, the guy that refers to conservatives is nothing more than like Nazis. That guy, Steve Cohen, is the

congressman for Memphis. And there have been extreme lockdowns and Memphis we were at twenty five percent capacity at restaurants last week and they finally went back to fifty percent. I mean, they've suffocated the economy and minority businesses and the majority of Memphis as minority owned businesses. They had enough, and they've really gone to the city council, which is you know, liberal liberal, and the mayor that's extremely liberal.

In the county government, it's extremely liberal. And so if you guys are killing us, you gotta give us some room to operate. This is getting ridiculous. And so now we're back at fifty percent, but even at fifty percent occupancy. No restaurant can make it long term, and we're seeing

massive failure rates. You look at Dallas, you look at Houston for example, same thing, right concern ovative states, very liberal cities, and the liberal cities because they have their own health departments, have the right to make up their own rules, and they're suffocating these businesses and these lockdowns.

And at some point, I think what's going to happen is you're going to have a lot of these liberals that own these businesses that are going to lose them, and they're gonna start fighting back before they lose them and go to these elective ficials saying, you guys are

destroying our economy. But I think Democrats have understand something, and you go back to the Obama years, what these liberals and Congress, what Biden, what Kama Harris, with these local elect officials understand is for them to have power, they need a percentage of the contrary to be suffering and dependent on them. They need to be food stamp presents like Obama was right, where you have more people on food stamps than ever before, because that gives you

power over those people. They need an unemployment rate of seven eight percent, at least six six and a half percent. So there's enough Americans that need them and need their government aid and need their government paychecks, they can control them. What Donald Trump did and what they do under the last four years is he empowered people did not need

the government. You had the lowest unemployment rate for Hispanics from among African Americans and history, single mothers in history, you get my point, And they didn't need the government. We set here, we're gonna get out of your way. We're gonna allow for job creation, we're gonna allow for manufacturing jobs. We're gonna allow for the American economy to work.

And the Democrats have come in said, hey, we need these unemployment rates back up where they were under Obama, and these lockdowns are allowing that to happen, and that gives them ultimately control over enough voters where they can say, become election day, Hey you better vote for us, and if you don't, you might lose that government paycheck. Ben Ferguson everybody the Ben Ferguson Podcast, and Ben appreciated my friend, thanks as always for joining. We'll have you back soon.

Les do it Man. Thanks you're listening. To the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Make sure you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app or wherever you get your podcasts. The Senate has a solemn responsibility to try and hold Donald Trump accountable for the most serious charges ever ever levied against a president. Those who say let's move on

that brings unity are false. When you had such a serious invasion of the Capitol incited by a president who we know, Urge people, told people the election was false, Urge people to come to Washington, Urge people to march on the Capitol. The Senate has to find is he guilty of inciting the violence that ensued When you have such a serious charge, sweeping it under the rug will not bring unity. It will keep the sore open and the wounds open. Does anybody really think Chuck Schumer, Chucky

Schumer here cares about unity? I would like to meet that person. Would I like to have actually have a sit down and ask how they think any of what we're seeing from the Democrat leadership. The Democrat Party leadership is devoted toward bringing the country together and taking us into a better place going forward. I've got to tell you something. The thing that many of us couldn't have anticipated.

Is the degree to which Trump't arrangement syndrome has rotted the brains of so many Democrats and really their souls in such a way that they they're not willing to go past this stuff. They insist on dragging us all into it. There's a there's a mania, there's a fixation that they have. And they're also I think not comfortable with the idea that there won't be the great Orange Menace of Donald Trump to be this this constant presence that they can they can have their their two minutes

hate against all the time. They want something there, and that's something is going to be anybody who doesn't want to go along with their agenda. It's gonna be you and me. And that's what I think is really so disturbing. Right now. They're trying to find people that they're saying that Josh Holly is calling for murder, and AOC said that Ted Cruz tried quote you know, tried to have her killed end quote. That was the That's insane. This

is insane. But this stuff is being said now, and if you were to just dismiss it, disregard it, I think you'd be you'd be missing that they really do believe this stuff. They take this seriously. I mean, here's Bro Cuomo over on CNN, who is when he's not running propaganda for his brother, who's doing the worst job as a governor of New York of any governor of the country is out there either be just being a part of the propaganda machine here that the GOP senators

they're complicit in this too. If they don't convict Play twelve, If you acquit after what you were shown today at trial on day two, it would be a giant middle finger to the men and women who saved you that day. We saw today more than ever, how they were fighting for your and their lives. They were beaten, maimed, they died for you, and you will be saying with your vote that that doesn't matter enough for you to risk political clout with the people who attack them. Yeah, this

is this is just what you're going to hear. Do you think that they're going to let this go? Do you think that they're going to take a more reasonable tone toward people that disagree with them after this? This is what the Democrat Party has become. Now everybody is the insurrectionist. Now you stand in their way. You're an insurrections. This happened in this oviout Union. They call them counter revolutionaries. Anybody that needed to be destroyed, attacked, needed to be

disposed was a counter revolutionary. You stand in the way. Counter revolutionary insurrectionist is the term they're using right now. They may find others. White supremacist is another version of a term of disparagement, applied broadly to justify any kind of demeaning and repressive measures that they want to engage in to utilize and wield power without any without any real pushback. That is what we see happening. That is

the reality of the circumstance around us right now. I think it's important for all of us to recognize that. I think it's important for all of us to see that. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Join the conversation and message Buck on Facebook, Instagram, or email Team Bucket iHeartMedia dot com. He may read it on the show like soft butter on warm toast. It's time to spread some freedom from coast to coast. It's time for roll call. We might have to take this one out of the rotation.

This was just a little too weird. It's like it's like an anthem for Space Force or something. I don't know. I don't, I don't know. I thought maybe you were getting back into public service. Yeah, perhaps, but where where are you are? You're a Mandalorian fan, right, No, I don't like anything Star Wars all, that's right. I forget because you know you're you're it's not easy to know what producer Mark is gonna be gonna be into with with the shows. So it's you know, there's some that

some that surprised me, some that don't. Yeah, Star Wars, I don't know. There's a lot of bad Star Wars stuff. I'll just say it. There's a lot of like really me, there's some good stuff, but I think it's a little overplayed personally. I did like the Mandalorian season one. I thought season two was really not that good. So now and I borrowed I borrowed a family members Disney Plus, and that family member has canceled because of the Gina

Corono firing or Disney Plus. Do you ever watch MMA, Producer Mark, like if it's a huge fight, maybe, but very rarely. Yeah, I don't know. I have never really gotten into MM. I've watched some never really gotten that into, Mma, I don't know, it's not really not something I've been into. All right, let's get to uh, but that could change, you know, check it out. I don't know. Let's get to all of our role call in box here. We got a lot of stuff to get to, a lot

of things happening in the world. So let's, uh, let's see what we got here. We have first up, Evan, Hello, bucket producer, Mark. How much do we actually think Joe Biden is involved in his own presidency? How many of these decisions is he actually involved in or getting any say on. I continue to get the feeling he's just a marrionette flopping around at the whim of those around him. But do you think he's making any of these wide sweeping decisions, or any at all, for that matter, for himself.

Or is all this just the deepest telling him to sign the papers and don't ask and he's just a figurehead? Evan Evan, Evan, Evan, it's a very it's a it's a question that nobody can really have a great answer to, but I'll try to give you a reasonable answer. I think that Joe Biden is a guy who's going to do whatever he thinks makes Joe Biden look the best

to the people he cares about. So as long as the Washington Post and the New York Times editorial boards and CNN and politically correct Corporate America and the teachers unions, as long as they're happy with whatever Joe Biden does, he's happy. I don't think that he's a man of any strong ideological convictions one way or the other. I don't think that he's somebody who comes into comes into the Oval office every day now and goes, I've really got it. There's some things that I really want to

get done for America. It's just it's all transactional for this guy. If I do this, how does it? You know, how does it make me look? If I do that? Are people going to be happy with me? I don't think he's got a really deep seat. I think he probably has a very generalized sense that, you know, I want to I want to help America. You don't want

to do the good America stuff. But then you actually think we'll hold on If you're going to pursue all these left wing policies, how does that really helping to America?

But yeah, I think he's mostly a pass through or a or a puppet for left wing interests, and that he was very useful for them because they knew if they ran somebody who really represented what the Democrat Party was all about, if they really ran you know, for example, I mean, if they ran somebody with the with the open politics of AOC, they wouldn't be able, they wouldn't

been able to be Trump. But they were able to run Joe Biden and pretend that he was just going to be good old uncle Joe and nothing, nothing to worry about, no problems here. And that was the big that was really in a sense of the big scam, because Joe Biden isn't what you're getting. Joe Biden's just some old dude. He's just some guy who is going to do what they tell him to do. And I think that's that's really the best way to do this. So I don't know how much of it is coming

directly from Biden versus who's whispering in his ear. I mentioned Rasputin earlier on the show, and I do wonder who who has the most influence on Biden right now. That's something I haven't gotten a clear picture of it. Who does he listen to the most? Sean, Why can't states fund the Keystone XEL pipeline, Sean, The Keystone XEL pipeline is a because it connects Canada through the United States, it's automatically going to be a federal matter. And because

it crosses state lines, it falls under it. It'll fall under a federal jurisdiction. And I mean, I'm sure you could probably fill a you know, an entire library with all the applicable laws and statutes and regulations and everything else. So yeah, it's states are not going to be able to do it. It needed to remember, Sean, it needed State Department approval to get done US State Department approval because it's a it's technically an international agreement and it's

an international project. Even though I know we think where it's like, is Canada really international? Though I know a lot of us think that, come on, it is Canada really another country? I mean, isn't it just kind of like America Junior up there and it's own way. You know, we love our Canadian brothers and sisters. Come on, but yeah, technically it is a another country, So it's right. Producer Mark, A lot of a lot of great skaters and uh maple syrup and what else amant leaven out? I mean,

they gave us hockey. That's all I need from them, right, That's all you need from them. So they get it. They get it done. For producer Mark uh Wayne Buck. It seems to Democrats would have us believe that the commander in chief of the most powerful military on the planet resorted to dog whistles and innuendo to get a bunch of unarmed civilians, civilian peaceful protesters to spontaneously overthrow

the government. Yeah, that sounds legit, you know why. And you make a good point here in the sense that if this was supposed to be an insurrection or a coup, it's the worst, most pathetic, most poorly planned, thought out, and of course insufficient insurrection in the history of the world. I mean it's almost like, you know, if I were to, you know, walk up the White House and say, I declare this, you know, the land of buck Topia, Like I can say that, but it's not gonna work. They

weren't armed. They weren't. They weren't. There was no hope of them, you know, holding the facility. And even if they had done some kind of a sit in or something. They would have been all escorted out. I mean, they cleared this again number of hours. So if we're really going to call this an insurrection, it's an insurrection of unarmed jackasses running around taking selfies. How is that? How

is that going to overthrow the government? How is that going to deal with what would have obviously been a massive deployment of US federal agents and and even military force, National Guard to clear them out. I mean, it was that. The whole thing is absurd. Donald Trump was trying. First of all, Donald Trump didn't order them do it, as we all know, but even just the action itself. Calling this an attempt to overthrow the government, how is that

going to work? You know, really think this one through. And they keep saying, oh, they were trying to they were trying to assassinate members of Congress. Where where's the evidence that that was attempted at all? I mean, I haven't said, maybe it's possible I've missed something, but I haven't seen that. I mean, you could see video of people once they get inside the building, they're kind of just walking around. I mean, there's that guy with the furry hat on being an idiot. I mean, this is

who's going to overthrow the United States government? Really astonishing, Wayne Vary astute observation from Wayne, Thank you so much for writing in Dave hey buck great show today. I think it's interesting most of our existing newspapers supported segregation back in the day, but nobody wants to bring that up. If people paid attention to the articles that were written in that era about segregation, they would be canceled. They

just advocate tearing statues down because they're hateful. Dave. I don't know which papers you're talking about specifically, but you to look, if you go back, if publications that have been around for a couple of hundred years or one hundred and fifty years or whatever it may be, are clearly going to be you know, insufficiently social justice aware and woke and everything. I mean, I'm sure you could make a huge list of them. So yeah, I'm not

surprised here. Oh he's got more. Cyclists are the absolute worst. They buy multiple two thousand dollars bicycles, load up on spandex, and decide to ride the most dangerous roads they can find inconvenience. Normal people like me that are just trying to get where I'm going on time. Then they like to brag on social media about their rides. They don't understand this isn't Europe, and they've pissed off of the other road travelers they've encountered that day. Keep up the

great work. Producer Mark loved the podcast Thank You, Thank You pruson marker you let's say thank you, thank you. Yeah and yeah, I mean, look, I'm sure there's some very nice team Buck cyclist who are listening to this.

But I'm sure they're also very courteous and respectful of other people on the road and don't make it a point of being incredibly annoying all the time, and aren't militant about it, and don't act like it's a crazy idea that somebody would want to drive a car and and not slow down to four miles an hour because the cyclist is going uphill or something right, And so you know, there's there's definitely some room here. There's definitely some we could meet in the middle a little bit.

Let's see, Producer Mark, I bring I bring the people together. Look at you with your unity. I'll call you Buck Biden. Yeah, wouchum. Actually we could do a Buck Biden T shirt, but it'd be a very different, very different kind of slogan. I'll add it to the store coming soon in twenty

twenty five. But yeah, so um. But the problem with the cycles that I really have is the ones who are in the big cities and they clog up the streets and then they act like maniacs and they yell at people and they run into me and producer Mark apparently.

You know, I'm just trying to get out of a cab, man, Like, I'm sorry that I didn't see you swerve around a corner going between two park cars and then try to run the run the ambit through an eighteen inch space between the car door and the car next next to the door, you know, Like, I'm sorry about that, bicyclist, but stop being crazy. How about that? Huh? How about that? Cyclists right? Yeah, follow the rules of the road too, Yeah,

that's Oh. I hate when they go the wrong way down the road, especially when you're driving and like there's a stop sign, a four way stop sign, but a bike just goes right past it out of nowhere. After you stop, you almost killed. Oh. I've screamed, screamed at bikers for that before telling you, man, I'm sure there's some Hell's Angels bikers listen this right now who are like, yeah, man, cyclists, those guys obey no rules. You know, they're like those guys,

the real terrors of the road. So I'm just saying, Um, Sarah, hey Buck, and Mark an aspect of this impeachment charade that I haven't heard anyone address. They say Trump insided violence, but they don't take into account that the people didn't need to be stirred up. We have had just a year of we have just out a year rather of shutdowns, of having our constitutional rights trampled on, having our businesses slash and when we turn out and droves to peaceably

fight back, i e. Vote, we were gaslighted. So many inconsistencies, so little willingness to investigate, we left the people are we The people are angry not because Trump stirred us up, because we know what the left is doing and we don't like it. If anyone's guilty of inciting violence, it is the left. We don't follow Trump because he tells us what to think. He is one of us. We follow him because we have the same ideals. America First, Sarah,

thank you for your powerful and eloquent message. Were very much appreciate you listening and for writing in This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Follow fuck on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. Back into the row call and now we get to it. Here we have in the roll call the latest Here, Greg Buxter, a conservative trying desperately to

stay warm in frigid, deep blue Minnesota. Sounds cold? Greg, weren't the bakers who refuse to bake cakes for the weddings of gay couples ultimately forced to bake the cakes by the courts. Basically, these were private companies who tried to refuse service over beliefs. Twitter is refusing service because Donald J. Trump hurt their feelings and calls out the status for what they are. Shouldn't Twitter be forced to

provide service just like the bakers were. Load this one on the ever expanding pile of leftist hypocrisy using my shield to go sledding. Yeah. Greg, See that has to do with what is considered a protected category. So there are protected categories in federal law now, and sexual orientation is one of them. But if you were if you look at what's going on right now, we should probably consider adding as a matter of law, political or political

orientation or affiliation to protect a category status. That's where we're heading to a place where I think that's necessary, and I think if we didn't do that, we would be we're just missing what's really happening all around us. So but now, of course, you have to be in power in order to actually get that stuff done, and we're not right now. So we'll continue to see what

we can do, all right. Going into some of the Instagram messages here, who voted for this drooling sew party hack idiot Joe Biden Butch writes that in apparently eighty million people did Butch, which I know is an amazing thing. It's it's pretty stunning that that that's where we are. But that is what we are told. Danny writes, Where the where's the gift of you dancing at Mark's wedding? Danny, It's it is pretty fantastic. I don't know, we we we I gotta I gotta give approval to share that

one though. We'll think about it. We'll think about it. Mark will probably convince me one day, But for right now, I think we're we're gonna hold off on it. I mean. Producer Mark ken Ken can confirm though Buck does have some funky moves, funky being the operative word. Yes, funky is a great way to describe it. Definitely funky. Martin writes Buck love the show. I keep listening and no

one's bringing this up. I understand the importance of Georgia, but what the heck makes us think they aren't going to do the same with these mail in ballots? Uh? They already said all absentee ballots are requested. You're a smart guy. Um, you know, I mean absentee ballots, Martin, are something that uh you know, Yeah, we saw how this worked in the national lecture. We saw this worked in Georgia. Uh, mail in ballots really what we're talking

about here? This is a big This is a big advantage that the Democrats are going to keep pushing very hard on. So I don't know what else to say. That's that's something we're gonna have to try to get them to stop being able to do. I'm gonna have to get them to cut it out because there's so much room for fraud in all that, and I think that we should all be aware that that room for fraud is going to be exploited and it's going to continue.

It's going to continue. I wish it weren't friends. I wish I could tell you that there was an easy way around. But mail in ballots are definitely, definitely going to be a problem if it continues to expand the way that it has. So you Channing Rights, Hey, Buck and listen to your show regularly. Want to call your attention to HR one twenty seven a massive invasion to our privacy and gun rights. You're listening to you to be aware of this bill and they need to contact

their Congressman. Channing, thank you so much for listening. Appreciate it. It It honored by it, and I got to check out HR one twenty seven. I don't know what it is yet, but I will team. That's it for today. She'll tie