Why The Destructive Left Always Blames Trump

coming up on The buck Sexton Show. This is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Magnorma stake America. You're a great American Again, the buck Sexton Show begins. Analysts, Now, anti Semitism and the widespread persecution of Jews represents one of the ugliest and darkest features of human history. The vile, hate filled poison of anti Semitism must be condemned and

confronted everywhere and anywhere it appears. There must be no tolerance for anti Semitism in America, or for any form of religious or racial hatred or prejudice. You know that, you know that very well. Welcome to the Box Exton show, the nation is in mourning after eleven people were murdered and uh about a half dozen more gunned down in or rather shot wounded in a in a synagogue in Pittsburgh, and the president they're spoken away that I I think

we would all expect the presidency under the circumstances. The shooter was a hateful, bigoted anti semi whose life, ironically in a sense, was was saved by the very Jewish people that he was espousing so much hate of. He was saved I see here according to Fox, by Jewish doctors and nurses after he was confronted by police. But this man went into the synagogue, he had an a r rifle and I believe a couple of pistols on him as well, and he brutally murdered eleven eleven people

at prayer um. And it was it was a difficult weekend. I mean, it's one of those stories where you read it and it just makes your heart sink. It just makes you feel like there's so much evil in this world and we all, we all have to do everything we can every day to fight against it, to do what we can to make sure that evil cannot thrive in this country or in this world. Everything we can we can do to fight against it. And I think that the President spoke about this in a heartful fashion.

I think that Sarah Huckaby Sanders, when she gave her press conference today, was also in earnest when she when she claimed that where she stated rather that the President um cannot more strongly condemned this kind of bigotry than he does, and that his heart is broken for the Jewish people. And as Americans, this should be a moment. This should be one of those moments when we all come together we say, hold on a second. There are some things that we can all agree are hateful and

evil and wrong. There's some things we will all stand with each other to fight against. There are some lines that we will all defend together as the American people. And any time that you have this kind of bigotry or or hate tried on display, it should be one of those instances. As an American, I know those of you listen to this al that we have people listening all over the world, including Team Buck Israel, Hey guys,

how you doing, and gals um. But as an American listening to this, I know that you feel the same way that any of us would do anything in our power to prevent this kind of a masker from happening, to help anyone who was caught in such a horrific circumstance as this. And now we do what we can with in some cases direct aid and assistance, but also just just prayer and uh and words of support and everything else that we can do for the Jewish community

in this country. And yet it immediately turns into a political issue, and without a moment self reflection, without taking just a beat to let the American people mourn, they make this about Trump. These people who do this every day, on every issue, at all times, are are sick. They have a problem, they really do. They are no longer

capable of being objective. You know, last week we were told that there was a bomber who Trump is responsible for because this guy whould already called it a bomb threat, you know, over a decade before Trump's presidential run and had a career criminal clearly you know, psychological problems. But Trump's responsible because he criticizes people in the political arena, and those are the people that were being targeted. They can't point to Trump ever, ever, inciting or calling for

violence against any of those individuals. But they say that Trump is basically responsible that they use these kind of weasel words. They'll say, oh, well he's he bears some share of the blame, and you know, because he They know that Trump didn't pack the bombs himself. They know Trump wasn't wasn't crushing up has to use the shrapnel for They're not that crazy, I suppose they're not that stupid. But they'll say that Trump was the reason for this in some way. And what they'll point to is, well,

he had his van. This guy had this van, sayok, covered in Trump stickers, covered in all this pro maga paraphernalia. And so we had to deal with this last week we talked about on the show. Now Here we are over the weekend, there's this terrible shooting on on Saturday on the Jewish Stabbath, and we are told that even though this shooter, it is clear, did not like Trump because specifically Trump was too friendly and too favorable and too much of a friend to the Jews, it's still

Trump's fault. Now, if we take this theory at face value, this theory that Trump has just raised hate in America, Let's be clear that that means that now Trump is respond honstable no matter who engages that they hate crime against anyone else. You know, if there is an anti Christian and anti Catholic, you know, hate crime in this country, let's say, you know, or you know, if there's if there's an Islamist extremist. Let's just put it this. If a je hottest kills a bunch of people, is that

Trump's fault. I want to know where the lines are drawn here, and I think the answer, by the way, is they would claim it's Trump's fault because you see, somebody from the Islamic community, if they were to radicalize, it would be because of Trump's anti Muslim rhetoric. So he would bear some of the share of responsibility for that too. If a you know, neo nazi white nationalist kills somebody somewhere, it's Trump's fault because he has implicitly

encouraged them. They'll say if a anti Semite who is anti Trump, I mean, you know you got on this list. Doesn't matter who it is, Trump is always responsible no matter what the situation was like, if it's a terrible circumstance, if there's violence and bloodshed here in America, and there's there's hate, and there's venom, and there's nastiness at its At the root of it all, it is Trump's fault. They say, this is delusional and it's really destructive too.

How can you have a conversation with somebody about Trump's policies when they really believe that he's dog whistling to white supremacists all the time in ways that I can't even begin to fathom. I'm paying attention to politics all day. I'm here in the swamp. I this is I live, eat, and breathe politics and national security. And I have no idea what some of these other pundits and and anchors and such you're talking about. Sometimes no, I'm like, what

are they what? It will play someone for you later you'll hear say, what does that even mean? Who are these idiots who's paying this so much? To be so stupid on TV all the time? And so they talk about division as they are creating divisions. I mean, this is how you know that the left cannot be taken seriously on this. They will try to escalate rhetoric while saying that rest rhetoric needs to be de escalated. They'll say, the reason we have terrorism and hate in this country

is because of Donald Trump. So Donald Trump needs to stop saying that the other side is bad. Oh that seems like a brilliant idea for Trump. Why not just caved your political opponents. Let them beat you into submission, bludging you into silence on issues that mattered to you. By attaching all these issues, all these problems, all this violence, has nothing to do with it. They're calling President Trump and ety somebody. I mean, President Trump grew up in

New York City. He's so as did I, which is a city that has I believe, the largest Jewish population anywhere outside of Israel in the world. Trump is has had countless friends who are Jewish. His personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, I know they've had a falling out, but you know he was Jewish, His son as Jewish, Ivanka converted Judaism, as grandkids are. Just Trump is not an anti Semit, not even a little bit, not even close. But they say this, the media says this. They pat themselves in

the back. Oh that's right, Yeah, we're speaking truth the power. No, you're a bunch of destructive little imbeciles that are saying this. It's immoral to make these claims. It's immoral to call someone an anti Semite who has blood on his hands because somebody else who hates the President, who despises his position towards Jews, decides to be violent, engages in this, in this horrific hate crime. I mean, he's now facing the death penalty, and good this guy should get the

death penalty for what he did in that synagogue. Trying to try attach Trump to this though, it's just so intellectually dishonest, it's so unfair, and it just goes to show you that there is there's no for it, good faith, There's no Let's have a real you know, last week was all okay, let's let's tone things down. Let's have a different, a different kind of conversation going for Let's talk about policy. Let's come together as Americans, all right. You know, the press is under assault at the type

the press drives. I I agree with Trump and that the press does drive a lot of this because the press is full of a bunch of preening, self obsessed, self righteous jerks, not all of them obviously, And I know this book. You're in the media. I'm telling you what n of the media is like, they are not good people, they're not honest, they're not ethical. It's all about the self, it's all about the agenda. They are activists posing as truth tellers. It is destroying this country

from the inside. They're the ones undermining institutions, they're the ones undermining public trust. And they turn around and accuse everybody else of exactly that. They tell you that Trump won't take responsibility. They take responsibility for nothing. Wrong story after wrong story, all critical of Trump. Oh, that's just a coincidence, As if we're idiots, we're really supposed to believe that. Yeah, sure, it's just a coincidence. They are

disgraceful and they are tearing this country apart. And I have to say it is very frustrating as well, because if if we were able to focus on what's really happening in America and then in the direction of the country right now and how we're all doing, this country is doing very well. This country is on the right path. But the left can't make a fair argument about why it's not. So what do they do? They make it about emotion. They make it about anger and viciousness and

destructive politics and lies and that's what they're doing. That's what they're doing with the president. We're going to continue to see this unfortunate or we're gonna talk by the way, without the caravan coming up. Got some big updates on that for you as well as um, some more following to last week with the bomber, and we we got a whole bunch of show planned teams. So stay right there.

I'll be right back. So let me just say that, you know, I I was able to give some thoughts on Friday on Fox News right after it had become clear what well we we found that the bomber was found. Um and uh uh, you know, the bomber was found, and we had to have this discussion about well, should we have civility now? Is that really what the left wants? And I was on this panel with Shannon Bream, who I think is whom I think is great and uh and you know, Wan Williams to give the Democrat point

of view. And I just wanted to share with you what I said Friday on Fox because when it comes to the bomber and the aftermath and now all this, oh, we need to be civil. We need to just take the temperature down. Here's what I really think about it. Play the clip, rationality, the demonization of Democrats. Sak is no wacko aberration. He is is the very face of Trump, buck Fair. They're over sixty million people voted for Donald Trump. This is one guy who's clearly disturbed, and he's a

career criminal, but he's far from a criminal mastermind. I think the calls for civility from the left are quite honestly un serious. They're unserious because of the record that they have where they didn't call for similar, similar civility when we had incidents that were even worse in terms of actual casualty suffered Steve Scalise, which the President himself has mentioned. And you can't call for a ceasefire while you're still firing, which is exactly what Democrats have been

doing all week. And if President Trump were to heed these calls, I just want to know if we're really supposed to believe they would stop calling him a traitor, a sexist, a racist, crazy. I think we all know the answers to that, So why would he He has nothing to do with it. He bears no responsibility for this whatsoever. Well, there's also a political culture on the left right now that has for months embraced mob tactics

in public. They've even tried to parse whether mob a term you can use for a massive people that are threatening individuals managing them in restaurants, which I think they lost that debate. But this isn't just something that a few people have done. We're seeing crowds of individuals acting out in a way that is full of rage, that is frightening, that is meant to intimidate, and then seeing multi millionaire TV pundits and anchors at different networks than

this one saying that that behavior is okay. So it's a completely different universe from one obviously crazy individual living in a van covered with the comments section of some websites that he pulled together and deciding to take these incredibly vile actions. Everyone agrees with what this guy did

was discussing the presidents that everyone has said it. There's something else going on though, on the left, where they seem to think that this kind of intimidation is warranted because they think that Trump is a fascist, because Trump is destroying the country, because Trump is undermining our institutions. That is the rhetoric that's coming from the top of the Democratic Party and the media apparatus rang against all the time. Yep, all of that is true. Stand by

all of it. Reiterate all of it, repeating all of it. I mean it. It is what needs to be said here in this moment of Oh, we all need to come together, really need to come together. Here's like what Here's what they put on TV over at MSNBC. The politics editor there, here's what he has to say about Trump when we're all supposed to come together. Now play

twenty four. As much as I may have criticisms of how law enforcement operates in this country, they are still our line of defense against maniacs and terrorists out there. But but I have to say, Nicole, and this has always been a problem with this president. He has always shown a sympathy or a dismissiveness towards terrorism. Uh. He

is a He is a terrorist sympathizer. I mean, given the way that he responded what happened in Charlesville, given how he responded to cause Shog, given the fact that he he puts what's happened today and through this week, and the context of how it affects the midterm elections, we don't have leadership in this country. When it comes to domestic terrorism, this president foments it as much as he is occasionally forced to speak against it. A terrorist sympathizer.

The MSNBC pot Etceterator calls the President of the United States, how much more stupidity do we have to really be subjected to before we just say, you know, I just don't want to hear from these from these idiots anymore. I just can't. I can't handle I can't even pretend to engage and hear their arguments. I I feel this from friends of mine. They say, I'm just sick of it,

and I understand the feelings sometimes, you know. And I spent a lot of time talking a lot of leftists, and it is it is no easy task these days. You know what this really comes down to, And this is what they don't want to tell you. They know that they are not going to win the Senate, and they know that the House is going to be tight.

And the left is aware somewhere deep down that if Trump was anywhere near this monster, this caricature that they've been saying for all this time, then Trump should get blown out, his party should get blown out. In the mid terms, right, it should be a wipeout in favor of the Democrats. What does it say that, almost two years into the Trump press and see who they say is a traitor and a fascist and a bigot and

a rapist and all these horrible things. What does it say that the party that is led by that guy is going to gain Senate seats and almost even though it's an off your election to hold on to the House of Representatives. How much more out of touch and deluded can the Democrat Party be? That's the question they don't want to have to do. It's just so much easier for them, so much more satisfying to say that it's just all about how Trump is a racist and

a terror sympathizer. It's just not true. And that's what the rhetoric is doing. It is giving people a license uh, certainly unbalanced people, certainly people on the fringes of American life. But it is telling them that what you're doing is okay. And that's why, Yes, there have always been anti Semitic incidents in American history. Nationalism goes hand in hand with the anti semitism. The entire d have anti semitism is to put choose outside the body politics outside the definition

of us. And that's what Donald Trump does, that's his theme, that's what his party is now committed to doing, eliminationist rhetoric. And the president has not been dabbling in eliminationist rhetoric. At some points, he doesn't dog whistle. He uses megaphones to tell these tribes that they belong to him. And this is leading to violence, directly, directly leading to violence. They say it is not somewhat or partially Trump's fault.

I mean, I saw a a an editorial about this over the weekend in the Washington Post, no less, saying that it is directly somewhat You know that they'll always put in this qualifier it's Trump's fault to an extent, you know, or you know, Trump should hold some some level of of the blame here. Uh, this is is,

this is disgusting, It's disgraceful. But when you have the individuals in the media who have taken Trump's entire presidency so personally and as an affront to their greatness and their values and how wonderful they are, Uh, there are no limits really on the bile that they will throw at this present There are no uh, there's no good faith, there's no decency whatsoever that they will extend to him and and to his supporters, to all of us. Remember,

it's not just about Trump. Underneath all of this, there's always this seething hatred of the Trump voter too. That's a part of the anti Trump movement. They they despise the voter. They don't because they don't think that, really, we've been fooled. They have figured out enough now. I believe the leftists in the media and the Democrat Party have figured out that we've made this bargain and we're

good with it. We're like, yeah, I like Trump. I know he's not perfect, I know he makes mistakes, but I think Trump is actually the right choice for America right now. So they hate us because of all of that, and that's why they feel completely justified in saying just the most despicable, disgusting things. I mean, here's here's another Washington Post person over at MSNBC play three. There's always

been the old Right or its equivalent. The difference is it was always on the fringe and the mainstream elements of the party, and certainly the president never validated that. What's happening what's so extremely dangerous about this is you now have the man with the largest megaphone in the world giving a nod and a wink, sometimes outright praise to the folks who are carrying on these conspiracy theories, and it is telling them, these people that it's okay

that they're getting a blessing to do this. You know, it's it's interesting that that he can go on TV that that's Dana Millbang's Washington Post and say that Trunk gives them a blessing right after he is explicitly, openly, repeatedly condemned this. But you see, this is one of the games that they play. They'll say, why doesn't Trump did, Why doesn't Trump condemn white nationalists? And people will say, okay, well he did, he just condemned them a couple of

days ago. Well, well he hasn't denounced it enough. And then people will do little Google searching and I'll say, we hold on a second. Trump has called white nationalist losers. He said there's no place in America for hate. He said this many many times, and they'll say, well, then why does Trump talk about white nationalists so much? He can't win folks. You know this there's nothing he can do that will make them stop calling him a racist,

stop calling him a white nationalist. They they do not extend the most basic level of good faith to him in any of these discussions, and they love to try out these these fake conservatives. I mean, he's fake Republicans like Jennifer Rueman, who's she is the queen of fake Republicans. The Washington Post still lists here as a Republican when

she writes things, which is just amazing. But you know, she she blames not just for what happened over the weekend, what happened last week, but for the overall increase in hate in America. She says, for I'm not going to plumb the depths or the shallow side of Donald Trump's mind, but I will say this, We've had a fifty seven percent uptick in the last year in anti Semitic hate crimes. The biggest sort of theme and anti semitism is that

Jews are outsiders, they are aliens. That you define a nation by Christianity, by whiteness, and if you can believe that they do not believe that Jews are white um and that everyone else's alien, everyone else is a threat that true America is not all men are created equal. It's not an ideal, it's not a credle nation. It is blood and soil. The entire idea of anti Semitism is to put Jews outside the body politics. And that's

what Donald Trump does. That's what he does by having a a Jewish daughter and a Jewish son in law and numerous Jewish grandchildren. That's what he does by having senior Jewish advisors in the White House, by being a better friend to Israel by leaps and bounds than Obama ever was for for a president who's probably the most popular American president in Israel, the state of the Jewish people, For a president of that stature to be called an anti semi just goes to show you how desperate the

left really is to try to make this stick. And I know that there is a fight within the Jewish community right now about well he's actually spoke to a rabbi about it today on my other show. Uh you know, well, he's good on Israel, but they don't like some of his domestic policies. But they do like some of his other domestic policies, but they don't like his uh, you know, his tweeting and his coarseness, and you know, and that's great.

The Jewish community is vibrant with political disagreements like like any you know, vibrant community would over politics. It's not a monolith in any sense. But there's not this overwhelming belief at all that he's an anti Semit. That's just that's fantasy land stuff. That's just not true. It's not reality.

And they're so desperate to try to make this what people believe, what they think, and what you're seeing here in this last couple of weeks before the midterm election is that the Democrats, really all they have is that Trump is hateful. Trump is terrible. They hate Trump, and so they want people to vote against Trump. They think that Trump is disgusting and disgraceful and all the rest

of it. And so their plan is to just keep hitting that, keep reiterating that point, keep pushing that as though it will somehow make the lives better of the people in this country who would then be subjected to Democrats with all their redistribution and all their nonsense about how we're gonna have you know, there's just basically a money ferry who's gonna give money for everything we need and no one's gonna have to really worry about paying for because the rich will pay, because the rich are

going to take care of it all. And then you have people like April Ryan who who just are are explicitly blaming Trump for all this, and she's a White House correspondent. Play twenty also been told that the President is laying low because he's hearing those calls. But at the same time, how do you marry this situation with the president? Last week says he's a nationalist. All he had to do is say white nationalist to that. Um, you know, we've seen this just before what happened with

the bombs. We saw the Kroger in Kentucky, a white man shoot and kill two black people, and then he got to the white person. White people don't kill white people. Okay, I wanna I want to jump in on her point about nationalism really quickly. Um that what she just did adding a word to another word to make it seem really bad. Guess what you can do that with socialism too? Ms Ryan, Right, Bernie Sanders democratic socialist. Oh maybe he's

a nash a socialist instead. Oh that's a terrible slander. Book. How could you say that, Well, I just changed the words, right, That's why you don't change the words. You know, Elizabeth Warren she is a socialist. Now I think she's actually a national socialist. Oh wow, that's a Nazi. That's terrible, right, because that's a change term. To say that. When Trump says nationalist he means white nationalists. Is just to make up what he is saying into something else. But that's

how desperate they are on all this. They'll just do that. You know, Trump said yes, but what he really means is no. They think that's analysis. Recently in some places in the nation, there's been a disturbing reoccurrence of bigotry and violence. If I'm a from the platform of this organization known for its tolerance, I would like to address a few remarks to those groups who still adhere to senseless racism and religious prejudice, to those individuals will persist

in such hateful behavior. If I were speaking to them instead of to you, I would say to them, you are the ones who are out of step with our society. You are the ones who willfully violate the meaning of the dream that is America and this country because it sude what it stands for will not stand for your conduct. The greatest president of my lifetime, with the possible exception of Donald Trump. We'll see how it how it goes.

We'll see how many years in office he has, hopefully eight, and we'll see what the full measure of his accomplishments look at. Reagan defeated the Soviet Union and probably saved the planet from annihilation. So that's a tough that's a tough one too. That's a tough one to be That's a tough record to compare against. But Trump so far is doing a pretty remarkable job in his own way. But I play that for you just because I think

that it is helpful for all of us. In fact, I would argue that it is necessary for all of us to remind each other, those of those who are conservatives, that our movement and our ideology, our belief system, our principles are rooted in uh respect for the individual, individual rights, human dignity, human life, liberty. That's that is the foundation of our of our belief system. That's where it all starts.

And so true anti semitism and true racism. And I say that with the qualifier of true because we know the left calls everything anti semitic, calls everything racist. I mean there they use it as a political cudgel. But true anti semitism and racism and uh and and bigotry

is not just nonconservative, it is antithetical to conservatism. Because if we are not all God's creation, endowed by our creator with inalienable rights, and if we are not all equal in the eyes of God and in the eyes of the law, then there is no such thing really as conservatism, and conservatism as we know it in this

country does not exist. It is not possible to be a conservative and believe that a white person, or and a and a black person, or a black person and a Hispanic person and a white person, that that they do not all have equal dignity, equal rights, equal worth as human beings and as citizens of this great nation. So when the left try so hard to create this perception that people who are conservative, I can't speak to the right, I mean the right, meaning all of it.

I have a second, speak the right in general terms, but you know there are some fringe elements of the right that you that that they consider themselves on the right. And you'd say, well, hold on a second, in what meaningful way. Are they conservative though? You know, this is where you start to really get into what is right wing and left wing even mean. You know, if you are more in favor of individual rights, if you are

about the individual instead of the collective. Right, the left in this country is all about the collective, and they're about collective guilt, collective identity, collective economics. They are collectivists. They believe in groups. They believe in the common good as defined by a core of elites that all speak in the language of equality and commonality, but live as elites and separate from the masses, but use the envy and antagonisms of the masses in order to beat the

other side politically, which would be us. We are the individualists, we are the individual rights. We are all God's creation, We are all human beings in this struggle together and should help each other and respect each other and each other's rights and dignity and life. And that is an

obligation on all of us. Um When they when they try to make this case that racism and anti Semitism and these different isms and bigotries exist on the right, I just I have a a real feeling of of outrage at that because it's so untrue and so unfair, and I think that the reason they push it. So it's not just because it works. It's dirty politics, but

it is useful for them. It is a shame that so many of the classes that the Democrats view as victims, whether it's just the working poor, or African Americans or or Hispanics, Latinos, women, whatever the group. Maybe it's a shame that so many of them have been propagandized to such that they really believe, and I know this from talking to them, they really believe that conservatives are racist. They believe that and you and I said here knowing

that that is a lie. That's not true. We're not racist. In fact, we're the ones that are always advocating for people of all races to be treated equally under the law. It is the left that advocates for disparate treatment in the eyes of the law, based upon race, based upon skin color, based upon not even real but perceived gender.

They're the ones that want these differentiations. And then they turn around and say that we're the ones who are obsessed with with race and gender and these other differences among among human beings. When at the end of the day. I think it couldn't be any more clear that our side, the side of conservatives and constitutionalists, are the ones that advocate for individual rights in the dignity of all people. And there has always been this effort to rewrite the

histories of the two ideologies of the two parties. This is why Democrats you get so dare I say, triggered when it has brought up that they are the part of the Democrats are the party party of slavery, segregation, Jim Crow, just go down the list. It was, it was historically always the Democrats. Democrats have been and are the party of the mob, mob mentality, the mob feeling. How does the mass feel? How do the masses view an issue? What do they demand? What do they shout?

What where is their rage directed? That has been the id that has been at the core of the Democrat Party. There's always been an intellectual strain and conservatism that has been first and foremost about the American founding in the Constitution and the rights of each and every individual and the natural law that underpins all of this. That it's

not really just about what the founding father said. Is that the founding fathers were able to harness, a sense of what is a universal and eternal truth about human beings, what is always true about people, what is always good for a society to promote, and what is always necessary for a society to try and prevent and to condemn.

You know, those universal truths are at the heart of conservatism, and so it's just it is the exact opposite of a true conservative to believe that a person is less than because of skin color, to believe that person is less than because of gender, less than because of religion. That is not who we are. And I know that you know that, and I know that, but I do think that it is worth sometimes taking a step back

and just verbalizing exactly why that is the truth. There's a lot of fakes and frauds out there, and a lot of very easy and clever ways for people to try and falsify their records and who they are. That's why if you're hiring or you're renting out your property, you want the experts at Global Verification Network to have

your back. So many people that have used Global Verification heard about them on their show are realizing that they made the right choice because they got the customer service and the expertise that they needed, and Global Verification Network is the only dual certified veteran owned background investigation and vetting company. They'll work with companies of any size, folks, So whether you're just a startup or all the way up to a fortune one, if you're doing this yourself

or you've got an HR department, call them. They should be the ones doing your background checks. Eight seven seven six nine five eleven seventy nine. That's eight seven seven six nine five nine my GVN dot com Again, that's my GVN dot com. Suddenly it's this group of folks. We don't even know where they are. They're way down there. That's the biggest thing. And you know, as serves the elections over, everybody'll be like, what what what what? What happened?

We were being in Vadas? Where to go? Oh? President Obama still thinks he's on the campaign trail for Obama. I think hasn't yet really understood that there are plenty of us who don't really want to hear from him, and uh, former presidents have done that courtesy to the American people, not to pretend to kind of be the president in exile. Nonetheless, he's talking about what's going on with this caravan as it is called. Now, what is really going on? To fill in the blanks here, we

have our man Raheem Kassam up in this piece. He is, of course the fellow of Rahim Kasam dot com. He has worked and senior strategy role for government in the UK. He's also formerly of bright Bart The man himself author of no go Zones. Mr Raheem, good to have you back. Hey, great to be here, but thanks for having me. So what is the latest with this caravan? By the way, I say Obama, he's still campaigning for Obama, remember, I mean, he's campaigning on the fact that his legacy is being

torn down. Um, so this is this is this is him campaigning on on on his ego rather than an office. And when he comes out and talks about the migrant caravan, you know, it doesn't surprise me that he's so desperate to try and make light of it and make it seem like not a great deal, because actually the caravan not just only increased in size over the years that he was president, this is a sort of annual now bi annual march through Central America up to the US border.

But it's also, as I've sort of dictated in my last couple of articles that I've written, one for the Daily Caller, one for the American Media Institute. UM, it's it's actually funded historically by Democrats, UM, by people who have worked in and around the U. S. Government, specifically in the U S. A I. D. Field, you know

that the foreign aid sphere. So it's no wonder he's trying to deflect from it, because really what this caravan embodies is deck aids of anti border, anti national sovereignty agitating from within the annals of the US government historically and from within the Democratic Party left and I and I really do mean with both money and significant time

investment in this. Now we have gotten a lot of pushback already from people in the media saying, oh my gosh, it's so crazy to suggest that there's anyone organizing this, as though they want us to think that this is spontaneous, and oh, by the way, they're really gonna walk the whole way, what can you tell us about the organization? And also have we started to see folks hopping on buses and trains for at least part of the way,

because I think that's a pretty predictable move. Yeah, buses and flatbed trucks we've seen now pushing people through Mexico to get to get to the US border even faster because apparently there's some elections coming up, and and you know, much as these people really loathe foreign intervention and foreign collusion, this is literally, uh, you know, up to ten thousand foreigners.

Latest estimates are around seven thousand, but you know, it could be up to ten thousand foreigners who are being bussed to the US border to to impact an election cycle. So to make of that what you will. But the groups are in question here. I mean the media does sort of try to make out like it's some sort of grassroots think. It's very strange because then they quote in their articles and you can see them on CNN

and ABC and NBC. Organizer Rodrigo of Ajor told ABC this will hold on either it is organized or it isn't organized. Um. And then when you go back and you actually do the sort of investigative journalistic work which I'm you know, I hate to say that nobody's really done on the U S side of things, you start to get a picture of who these people are. Mr. Major runs a group called Pueblos in Front Terrorist the leader, the co leader of which was arrested last week for

organizing and taking part in this criminal activity. UM. You have him linked to another group which operates UM in California and in New York. Openly they are anti uh you know, US law advocates. Effectively, they cut the tracking devices from illegal immigrants tags on their ankles. They do all this, it's called APPO FAN and they're in turn funded by big corporates both in the United States and and from within Mexico as well, and aided by Mexican diplomats.

Again U, S, A I. D. Folks. And when you really start to pull this whole thing together, it starts to look like one of those sort of crazy conspiracy theories. But these same people sit on conference calls and are in email chains UM with you know, the Socialist Party of America activists who James O'Keeffe Project Veritas recently rumbled inside US government departments trying to stop the Trump administration's

policies going through. So this actually goes really far and really deep, and I'm still doing a lot of investigative work around it to see actually what federal funds or what state level funds have been sent to these groups over the past couple of decades, because they're not new, by the way, Some of these groups have existed since the late nineteen thirties, by the way, and the caravans at the time, and and and since then have been small and have really sort of picked up numbers over

the course of time. But now we're seeing, you know, four thousand at the start of this one, seven thousand currently. And if this one reaches and it conveys a pull factor into the United States, that is to say that the US does allow even some of those people in the next one you're going to see it will be fifteen thousand, and the one after that will be twenty

five thousand. And this is the same thing we saw in Europe in the migrant crisis truly started years before that, and in it was over a million people trekking through Europe. Don't forget right here. What is the Democrats play here? Is it for the mid terms or is it bigger than that, or is it both? Well, it's been bigger than that for some time. I mean, this is just

a political opportunity that they're taking. I mean, the the broader philosophical thing that they've been hammering on for years, and actually a lot of them have either written thesis about this for the American University or been funding halfway houses in Mexico to help people through um when when they've been doing this historically. The big play is this.

It comes down to what the United States is? Is it a nation with borders or is it sort of an amorphous you know, you often here America is an idea? Is it an idea that they can twist and manipulate and contort and shift the demographics of and and and therefore shift the voting patterns of and therefore shift you know, the broader philosophical direction of I mean I often say this. You know, our civilization, Western civilization is still fighting the

Spanish Civil War. It's still litigating, you know, the authoritarian left versus the authoritarian right. The difference is the media jumps on the authoritarian right and exposes them for exactly where where they are, who they are, where their money comes from, so on and so forth. Nothing of the sort ever happens to the hardline socialistic authoritarian left. And I don't mean, by the way, the maxied waters left. I mean the real hardline socialists left and this is

where all of this traces its roots back to. These are true sort of Bolavarian socialists that are organizing these caravans, um And And I'll tell you this. I mean, I'm starting from a position of looking into the federal funding

and state level funding of this. Now, I would be remarkably surprised, um if if at the end of my investigation it doesn't turn out that not only has there been money from the US government going to some of these organizations, but actually if it's not been hit a lot historically, um And and very well utilized because there are it's not just one group doing this, there is a whole network behind this, some of them based out of Los Angeles who have openly professed their support for this,

which are funded in turn by Amazon Smile charity program and Ralph's charity program, the Big California Supermarket. There is a lot of money at play here. Ran come back when you have your your final assessment on laws. All right, we want to hear what what the dispensation of all this funding and everything else really turns out to be absolutely or disposition rather. Thank you so much, Raheim Raheem dot com, Raheem Kasam dot com, everybody author of no

go Zones Rahem, thanks so much for joining. Thank you for having TAM. We got more. Stay with me. Security breaches happen all the time. I can't even keep up with all the news stories about the mass hackings of enormous institutions, government, corporations, individuals, you name it. It's hard not to worry about where my data is. I'm constantly concerned about it. As somebody who has had world class

security training, I'm still worried. But you know, that's why I turned to the security experts at Express VPN VPNs of Virtual Private Network. What that means is that it protects what you're doing online and Express VPN has easy to use apps that run the background of my computer, phone, and tablet, and the protection from Express VPN takes only one click. Make sure that the bad guys can't steal my history, can't steal my data, information and sell it

or miss you use it. Protect your online activity today. Find out how you can get three months free at Express vpn dot com slash buck. That's Express vpn dot com slash buck for three months free with a one year package. Express vpn dot com slash Buck. I think then they're gonna handle logistics for the border show. They're gonna they're gonna monitor central traffic intelligence, they're gonna be

moving food, water supplies for the border show. And what that does is that releases the border religens who are currently doing those types of jobs to be on the front line as law enforcement officers defending their nations. So I think it's a good move. Also thinking to see a lot more d d ASS deployed, I would I would think the president was sent up to five thousand troops down there, and uh, and what's who happens but the border. Having the military on the border is a

great idea. That's right, five thousand they're saying, now US military maybe heading to the southern border, and this is all about auxiliary functions to assist border patrol, and and that at that level, I have to say that there's nothing about this that I find surprising or or really strange. I the previous administrations have done this. You could say, Buck,

why so many? Well, why not why not put as many border patrol officers as possible out in the field to police the border instead of having to do back back office logistics and other other things that US military are very well suited to assist within this purpose. And and isn't our southern border. Isn't that part of our

national security? You know? We we have been trained by the left and by all these immigration activists not to think of immigration as a national security issue, when in fact it is one of the purest national security issues that exists. In fact, short of a foreign invasion, I think you could argue immigration is at the very top of the list of now sational security concerns that we have. If you cannot enforced borders, you cannot protect resources, you

cannot effectively uh, tax and and assess your population. I mean that there's a whole bunch of stuff that comes into You need to have control of your borders, right, I mean, if somebody can just come and go from this country as they please, for example, why would they ever why come here and not pay taxes and leave and come back when they want? You know, you have

to worry about anything. There's a whole political structure here that's in place because the people that are citizens have an obligation to the state, and the state has an obligation to its citizens. So this should not be such a surprise. But you'll notice that for a lot of a lot of Democrats, just the idea that five thousand US troops are gonna be deployed to the border, to the US Mexico border, Um, to deal with this migrant caravan.

They're gonna say that it's a political stunt. And sure, I mean, there are optics here, there's no question about it. And there are clearly reasons of making a point that the president is sending people down to the border in

this way. Um, But there's a lot there's a lot more at sake than just making a point, and and that is that if this caravan gets through, it's very understandable people would think that future caravans would get through, that there would be other things, other groups rather, Uh, that would be even larger. And that starts to turn into well do we even really have a contrary? I mean, at what point is it just an open border? We don't. We don't call it that. But DHS Secretary Nielsen had

some interesting things to say about this play clip H eight. Please, Uh, this caravan is not getting in. Uh. There's a legal way to enter this country. Uh. Those who choose to enter illegal be stopped. We are working with our partners in Mexico. They have taken unprecedented firsts within their territory to ensure an orderly flow and that those who have no legal right to be there are removed. We intend to do the same. But my general message to this

caravan is do not come. You will not be allowed in. There is a right way to emigrate to the United States, and this is not it. I appreciate the Secretary's messaging here, but I'm not sure she's right on the merits. I think they will be allowed in. I think that unless there's a change to the laws on asylum right now, it is very likely that this group will get into the United States. And that then brings me to the possibility that that I had raised last week, and I'm

hearing more and more say this now. Maybe Trump decides, you know, with the deployment of these troops to the border, and there's clearly a flexing of commander in chief national security muscle that's going on here, maybe Trump decides that under his authority, as I've described it to you, as commander in chief, he can decide that any class of

of of alien doesn't have to be illegal alien. Just any class of alien can be barred, can be prohibited entry into the United States based on the judgment of the commander in chief. Uh and the Supreme Court has affirmed this even recently over the whole Muslim ban. Maybe that's Trump's plan here. He's gonna say this migrant caravan does not qualify for asylum. There are ms their team members in this group. They are a security concern for

the United States. They will not be let in. Now you can imagine the Left will completely freak out if he does this, But I think he does have the authority to do it, and I'm starting to think that that may be where he's heading here, that he's that they're trying to tell them. Now, I mean Secretary Nielsen saying you're not going to be let in, And what she's trying to do is prevent them from showing up, because if they show up, it's not going to be

the asylum process. It's going to be the President United States, under his authority as the chief executive of the United States government telling them they can't come in. And maybe a court will try and you know, and you know that it might make its way all of the Supreme Court. But guess what what's up course at your Cavanaugh. I have a feeling Trump because it is in his authority, statutory authority to do so. I have a feeling good he will be upheld then. But that's where this showdown

could be heading. Here's what Nielsen said, by the way, about about the caravan and whether it we'll get in place. Seven. We have a crisis at the border right now. We are stopping between fifteen hundred and seventred people a day. If you seek asylum, do so in the first safe country. Mexico has offered you refuge. If you want a job, that is not asylum. If you want to be reunited with your family, that is not asylum. If you want to just come live in the United States, that is

not asylum. There are legal ways to do that, but this is about the rule of law. We stopped three thousand people a year who have travel travel patterns similar to terrorists from attempting to come in the South a supporter, and as you know, in general, we stopped across the United States ten owners suspected terrorists a day from getting into the United States. She's saying it's not asylum. Everyone needs a stop with this. Oh it's a sound if.

If it's a silent to come from Honduras because you don't like your job there and you want to make more money, then every country in the third world has to have essentially an open immigration policy the United States because anyone can claim that they need asylum. Honduras is not in the middle of an ethnic cleansing. Honduras is not in the middle of a natural disaster where there's no potable water anywhere and everyone's dying. Honduras is just

a country that is not doing well. It's because primarily of crime and corruption. But that can't always be our problem. And I don't just mean America's foreign policy problem. I mean your problem and my problem, our tax dollars having to support people that come from that community, and our community is having to shelter and dissimilate people from that community if they have not come in through the legal process. And redefining asylum is a perversion of the asylum process.

I mean redefining asylum to mean domestic abuse. So now anyone who gets who's you know, domestic abuse is horrible. We all know this that anyone who's a subject of domestic abuse. Anyone in the world can stroll up an Americans say, well, I've been domestical abused. How could you disprove that? If someone tells a convincing enough story, then they get to stay. This is increasingly not just a porous border situation, but starts to feel like a de

facto open border situation. Remember there's no such thing as an open border state, so what does that even mean? But we're getting closer to it than anybody else. It's time we draw a line here, and it's time we hold the line. Nobody knows exactly what took place yet, it's too soon. But this is a case where if they had an armed guard inside, they might have been able to stop him immediately. So this would be a case for if there was an armed guard inside the temple,

they would have been able to stop him. Maybe there would have been nobody killed except for him. Frankly, so it's a very very uh very difficult situation. You think that all churches and synagogues should have armed guard I hate to think of it that way. I will say that I hate to think of it that way. So we'll see you with them. It's certainly an option President Trump saying maybe an armed guard would have been able to save lives in that horrible shooting at the synagogue

in Pittsburgh. We've got somebody who's got strong opinions on the matter of having somebody who is armed and trained on premises as a general matter. Jesse Kelly is with us now. He is, of course the host of the Jesse Kelly Show. He is a fan favorite here in the Freedom Hunt. You can hear him on our I Heart uh Sister station of nin k PRC down in Houston every night. Mr Jesse Kelly. Great to have you on, Great to be here, Black happy to do it. Brother.

So you know, I'm always a little frustrated because I'm not surprised. Surprised is not the right works. I know that after a terrible shooting incident, wherever it is, there there's always this suggestion of, oh, why do you bring up armed guards, as though that's some crazy idea. Uh, you know, I've I've seen plenty of armed guards and or armed police at major religious sites where I grew

up in New York City. I just don't know, Jesse, why this gets dismissed by the well, I guess I do know, but it frustrates me that the left just dismisses this out of hand. We really do just want to save lives. Yes, boy, it gets dismissed for a simple reason. That's because it's the truth. It's just's like the left must dismiss all things that are the truth.

It is a simple, obvious solution that would obviously solve the problem, and therefore the left is forced to hate it because they have to live in a world of make believe. We have armed guards everywhere we truly care about. Everywhere you truly want to protect. The place that's a target or a potential target has an armed guard inside of it. That's called security. That's the norm. That's the

real world. But even bringing up an actual solution is just going to get you reactions of horror from the left, who they think the only solution is disarming every lawbine exhibisen. I just can't imagine the circumstances where I'm in a place that generally speaking, a lot of people do not you know, you're you're you're not expecting necessarily, it depends

where you are, right. I don't know what it was like in this Pittsburgh synagogue I'm guessing probably none of the you know, none of the parishioners are are are ever armed. Uh. And I don't know none of the congregants, I should say, are ever armed. But I know there's some churches in the South where some people are on right. I mean, it depends on where you are. But the the idea that this is automatically a bad idea, I just think it just goes to show how ideological a

lot of the reaction to this is. Because if I'm sitting there and I see somebody who's got a side arm, and you know that's that's either a law biding gun owner showing their side arm, or is trained security or or a bit perhaps off duty law enforcement. The last thought that ever goes through my mind is oh, well, I'm less safe now, Jesse. I mean this seems very basic. Well, it seems basic to you, Buck, because you were c I A and you have common sense and that you

you acknowledge the way the world really is. But one thing I have come to grips with is how frightening guns of any kind are for those who have never experienced them, never held them, never shot one, never been taught the basic safety about them. It really is a terrifying thing for people who don't know. They look at it and honestly, it sounds crazy. They think the thing's just gonna start shooting. No, I think you make a

really good point. And you know, I know you're not just a Texan, but also we're a marine, so you've got double firearms familiarity baked in there. But you know, you you look at at the cultural differences in the very, very blue areas versus a lot of the rest of the con tree. When I tell people that I went to a a camp as an eleven year old where we were firing rifles, they look at me like I'm nuts.

I mean, they think this is crazy sounding. But it just goes to show that part of the political and cultural divide we have now in this country is exactly what you said. It's not just that people don't have familiarity with guns. Well, that's a big part of it. They've also been raised to think, or they've they've been led to believe by their peers and was around them, that guns, except in the hands of the state, are always a bad thing. Really, I mean, that's really the belief.

And also, by the way Jesse the people who aren't part of the state apparatus, meaning there aren't police or military who want to have guns are at best suspect and at worse a threat. Yeah, my kids are eating nine. They've both shot firings before, real guns, not just baby guns. They've shotguns. They're familiar with them. They have had guns safety drilled into their heads. They know where the weapons are in our home. They know they're never allowed to

touch them unless I'm around. That's life. And guess what, They're safe with them. But but what what really funny? As you mentioned a cultural issue, and I understand having lived in the Northeast that lived all over how people view it differently. But here in Texas and other places that I've lived, it is the norm for people to carry in church. I put up a tweet the other day, I think you are insane if you are licensed, if you are trained to do so, to not have your

weapon on you in a place of worship. You have mass amounts of people that are prime targets for evil sitting there with their backs to the door. Stop living in this rosy world of make believe and acknowledge the world as it is. Sick Monsters like this scumbag who shot up a synagogue exists, is not the last one on earth, I promise you. So do you do you carry in church? Absolutely? I carry in church. Everything was Sunday, you swell in general if you see me, I'm off.

But in church a d percent of the time I'm carrying loaded on my hip. Yes, and there are texes. That's really funny. You would love this. We have these things called Now this is not the church I go to. We have these cowboy churches where people just show up in boots in jeans, and I'm not kidding. They ride horses to church. They will open carry firearms in church. The one my buddy goes to, he has a Copenhagen in his lip as he gives these sermons. The pastor

does in a pistol arms him. Now you can make fun of that, and people will as some absurd rednet caricature. But the bottom line is that's the safest church on the planet. Ain't nobody's shooting that place up? I would think, So. I think that's I think it's a fair point. So I just again, if we're gonna talk about solutions, real solutions should be treatedly or at least real uh, you know, attempts at risk mitigation. I mean, solution might be do

strong words at least be taken seriously. But you know, the left when it comes to guns, it's it's all really just a cultural a cultural divide issue for them, and the virtue signally of guns bad and people with is about. This is what I always say, Jesse. It's more than just the left opposes firearms. It really is a dividing line between the kind of people that the left likes and the kind of people that left doesn't.

I mean, guns are right up there with being pro choice or pro life in terms of what separates out the two sides of America. Now you're right, you're right. And when it comes to guns, I'll say what I say, after all these gun grabbing leftists start coming for them after a mass shooting. If the guns are the problem, where is the mass shooting at the gun show? Where does it happen in American history? There are guns everywhere, everyone has up on their hips, there on the counters,

everybody's buying them, everybody's selling them. There's guns ammunition. If guns are the problem, why has there not been a mass shooting at a gun show. Yeah, and why are there so many mass shootings in so called gun free zones? As we know, but people don't want to learn this lesson unfortunately, and they don't want to take the problem as as an issue of fact. They want to deal with it emotionally. But Jesse Kelly, everybody KPRC Houston on

what time? Jesse seven to eight Central time? Seven to eight Central time. There we go seven to eight Central time. That Jesse Kelly show. Also follow a man himself on Twitter and yeah, he'll be back here in the hot soon, Mr Jesse Kelly. Always a pleasure, sir, come back soon. Appreciate your brother team will be right back. Well, I'd like to be president. Okay. Look, I think hopefully when we have a Democrat in the Oval office in January,

there's gonna be so much work to be done. I mean, we have confused everybody in the world, including ourselves, and we have confused our friends and our enemies. They have no idea what the United States stands for, what we're likely to do, what we think is important. Uh So the work would be work that I feel very well prepared for, having done in the Senate for eight years, having been a diplomat in the State Department, and it's just gonna be a lot of heavy lifting. So are

you going to be doing any of that lifting? Do you feeling? Oh? I have no idea care, but I'm I'm going to you know, I'm not going to even think about until we get through this November six heavy lifting, folks. That's what she says. That's right. How long she thinks she's coming back. I've been't and you know, I've been saying it all along. And you could tell there that she knows she's not supposed to let that out right now. She knows she's supposed to hold back a little more.

It's not supposed to go there, not supposed to be, you know, obviously pushing for her own future in the White House at this stage of the game, because she comes from a damaged political brand. Uh, But she can't help herself. Hillary Clinton, as I have said, has a hole in her soul. The only thing that will fill it in her mind is the ultimate power of the presidency. And there's nothing else that she could ever have ab or could ever do that would make what she has

been through. Because I'm sure she views herself as a kind of victim and a and a martyr for the left wing progressive cause. Politically speaking, you know, she stood beside Bill, she allowed so many people to bash her all these years. I mean, I'm saying this is in her, in her mind, the only thing that is just the only way that justice is done is if she becomes president United States. And I I've been saying it, and i just want to make sure that I'm very clear,

very on the record here. What happens is that the Democrats, if they take the House, marches right into fights over impeachment. That becomes the whole discussion. We're just going to be fighting over impeachment really for the next eighteen months. And then the narrative is that the only way to set right what they could not get because they will not have two thirds of the Senate, so they can't remove Hillary.

But the only the way to set it right would be to make Hillary president finally, to break that deeling and finally put her in a position where she gets to be the president of the United States. Um, I'm not the only one who's thinking this. Hillary yourself. You could tell it's like, well, i mean, I'm not saying I'm running, I'm just saying that I really want the job still, and nobody is more qualified than I am.

I mean, this is this is the kind of stuff you say when you want something that you know you're not supposed to want and or at least you're not supposed to say you want it. But that's where we are with this. You know, she she has not given up one bit. She still thinks that this is the way that's all gonna go. And and what a what a a crazy story. In her mind, it's got to be for running against Barack Obama and losing, running against

Trump and losing. And in the end though, in her mind, justice prevails and she sets right the waror old and you can tell that she said, oh, you know, there's so much work to do and everything. You know, her mindset, her attitude is all right, America. You know, I'm the one that's got to fix fix the mess that that Trump created. And oh, by the way, you owe this to me, you owe me the presidency. That hasn't changed one bit. And she is very much still in that mindset.

So I know it's a little early, but keep in mind that next Tues or this coming Tuesday way now, yeah, next Tuesday. Next Tuesday, the midterms will be over and the presidential election will begin. Next Tuesday is when we start to talk about who's really going to run the Democrats side. I think, by the way, you're gonna have a huge field of candidates on the Democrats side. I think you're gonna have a a massive field of all

kinds of people, including some real characters. I'm not totally convinced that Havanati still thinks that or doesn't still think that he's gonna run. I'm not convinced. As crazy as that may really be to anybody who's living in the real world, I would not be surprised eyes if you did, in fact have an Avanadi candidacy, I could see, I could see that happening, and I think that you look at some of the others out there. Elizabeth Warren probably

still gonna run again. Folk A Hunt is herself still going to run because she thinks that in the era of Trump, all that matters is that you deliver for your side, and no matter how humiliating her whole fake Native American ordeal may have been, she thinks that she can still deliver socialism for America. That's that is what the fight is going to be. Make no mistake about it. This is going to be about This election will be about socialism. The last election was about the crony, corrupt,

kleptocratic Clinton's. That was quite an alliteration, but you know what I mean. The last election was about the progressive media elite establishment finally getting getting the uppercut that is so deserved after all these years. And the next election is going to be socialism, no doubt in my mind. It's going to be open. Forget about the kind of Bernie Sanders cuddly I just want free school stuff. It's going to be open. Uh. Se tax rate, kind of

redistribute the wealth, reparations for all kinds of historical wrongs. UH, massive government intervention the healthcare markets, open borders so that you can dilute whatever paying the productive citizens feel by just drowning out their votes with with new arrivals. Uh, that's gonna be with The next election is all about uh. And what's with that? In mind? By the way that I think of some of these some of these never

trumpers are just getting crazier and crazier, you know. They They've gone from Russia collusion and now they have to find something else to justify their their hatred. And I mean, Max Boot, I feel weird even talking about him because he's such a weirdough and is so insignificant in terms of his influence and his thinking in the in the conservative movement. In fact, the only influence he had was to get us into wars that were, at least in one case, a very bad idea. Um. But you know,

he'll just sland your Trump with stuff. Blake clipton Fox News and that crowd, Bright Bard and Info Wars and the Daily Caller and Republican Congressman, they have been vilifying George Sorrows for years, and basically because George Sorrows is a rich Jew, and so when they talk about Sorrows, they're talking about a rich Jew who is in control of everything. Or when they talk about globalist, which is the term that Trump refers when right wings. When when

Trump says globalist, right wing extremist, here Jews. This is the repugnant dog whistling which has gone on. It's thought, and you're right, it's not just Trump, It's a lot of Republicans, It's a lot of folks at Fox News. They really everything that he says, by the way, everything people don't refer to anti semitism when there's criticism of Sheldon Addelson, who is a very wealthy Jewish Republican donor,

that's apparently not anti Semitic. His notion that globalist is some kind of dog was a globalist is a term that's been used in international relations for decades and has nothing to do with someone being Jewish. You know, Jimmy Carter was a globalist. I mean, there there are lots of people that you could look at and refer to historically that were referred to then as globals. Have nothing

to do with Judaism or certainly with anti semitism. Um. But Boot realizes that if you're gonna go to the other team, it's not enough to just say I don't like Trump. You have to say I despise Trump, I hate Trump. I'll do anything. I'll say anything. I will bend the knee and beg forgiveness from the left and be a turncoat and slander all my former friends and allies.

I don't know how these people sleep at night. I can't imagine turning on all the people that I respect and work with, and no now and am ideologically in line with and later just turned around because it was convenient for me and call them all racists. What a cretan this Max Boutin is. It's disgusting because right now

the only constitutional check against this sort of abhorrent behavior. Again, the guy really a guy who was sending a message by time and time again tweeting about baseball or talking about his bad hair day. There that was done intentionally to send a message to white nationalists. His tweeting about Basebaul bullpen strategy the very same day of the synagogue slaughter, as if to send a message, as you said, Joe, to his adoring white nationalist fans, that the murdering of

these worshippers was not even a concern. That's the message. It sends. To be clear, what the heck are Mika and Joe talking about? I really mean that maybe I should ask what the heck are they smoking? What producer, Mike, can you even explain? I really mean, what are they talking about? This makes no sense to me at all. The tweets about baseball are now signals to white nationalists.

I mean, this is this is the equip valun of the woman at the Kavanaugh hearing who like, you know, stretched her arm for a second was doing a white nationalist gesture, which only morons believed. But there are a lot of them in the media. What are they even talking about here? Yeah? That was crazy. And I when I first was listening to it, I thought they were sort of like joking, but then I realized I was

Joe Meek in I having their sense of humor. So, but they were talking about the World Series and uh, there was an actual huge play or or a big controversial move that took place in a particular game that Trump was tweeting about, and they equated that to uh, that being a code of message to white nationalists. So I think, you know, it says a lot about what Joe meek in their psychological state at the time. Yeah, a coded message. Do we think they can interpret the

code like? Because because I'm not aware of what this, you know, it's not like a dog whistle where you go, Okay, I guess I know what they're getting at here. Whether I agree with it, I didn't even it's coded, So I guess they're like cryptographers or whatever. They must know stuff that we don't. Yeah, And one would wonder if the even are paying attention to the World Series of basic because this was legitimate, like news like this in

a sports world. This was a big deal and it was very It was talked about all over the place the next day. And what did happen? By the way, one of my friends who came over for a drink ol Buddy Mot on Saturday. He's a big Boston guy, he said he was up until three am or something. I don't even I don't watch sports because I'm barely

an American in some ways what happened here? So Game three on Friday night, yeah, went, was the longest World Series game in the history of baseball, when eighteen innings, uh probably ended around two or three in the morning. Um. Dodgers were down two games the nine, so they had to win, and they did. They wanted to walk off home run, which was great for them. So the controversy

took place the next day, which was on the Saturday night. UM, the Dodgers were winning again going into like the eighth or ninth inning and their picture was cruising along and the Dodgers manager took out the starting pitcher with a four run lead and he wound up blowing the game and losing it and then eventually lost the World Series. So the big all the news was, I did the Dodger take out the starting picture while I was creezing along, And that's what Trump commented on. And then well that's

clearly but that's clearly a signal of the white nash clearly. Yeah, you know, you pull out your best picture. I mean, that's that's that's essentially you know, you might as well have a swastick armband on or something exactly. Yeah, stretch are nuts, dude, But who are you rooting for in that whole baseball situation? You know? I I was actually rooting for Boston. I know, it's a little it's some heresy coming out of that. Now, it's all right, I know how it is with you Philly guys. You in

Boston gang up on New York. I don't know. I am not. I'm not. Well, we we have a history with l A and Philly. We've beat them, they've beat us. So I was not a big l A fan, So I was gone with the Boston for the series. Alright, fair enough, all right, but pretty so, Mike, I'm glad one of us know something about sports, because I remember when I when I heard that before the show, when I heard that sound, but I was like, i'n have to have Mike explained this one. Because Mike, Mike, and Joe.

I think that they've decided that their brand is that they're going to be the most shrill anti Trump lunatics on TV. And that's a very crowded space right now. You know, that's not an easy thing to be number one in the drama they bring to the table. I mean, they the angst, I mean, madd they look so miserable. They even noticed that when they're on air, how miserable and unhappy they look. Yeah, well, you know, generally like would go through life, buck, I'm sorry, generally being double

home wreckers is a bad starter to things. I'm just just putting that out. I know, I know I try not to go to personal, but you know that's not good. That's not a good thing, not not what's the word, it's bad Karma's bad karma. So speaking of I have no good transition here. But you know, ce because I was like, wait, NBC, CBS, they're both networks other than that, and they're both full lives. But CBS had this, uh, this segment about hate speech and taking down hate speech.

And this has been one of the issues that, as you know, I've been talking about for a long time here where you know, you have this chorus, particularly on the left, of oh, you've got to get rid of certain kinds of speech online. Um, and you're not doing a good enough job of it. And then we find oh, well, you mean it's gonna be abused, and that they're just gonna use this to shut down conservatives. That should shock no one, but that's what ends up. That's what ends

up happening time and again. And so they can't get the true anti Semit's offline, they can't get ISIS and these other groups uh to be taken out of their their the cyberspace. But what they can do is is all of a sudden have second pro Second Amendment groups that find their Twitter accounts or their Facebook accounts deactivated. But here's part of this discussion, and I have a slightly different view of this in terms of what the actions of these platforms should be. Play clip thirteen, Jim,

you can be radical online. Radicalized online has already been supported by our government. That's that's we believe that after nine eleven, when people at access to ISIS supporters and those who are trying to radicalize isolated individuals. We know now that Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube all have agreed with this and have worked with the government to take a lot of these videos down. Why not when it comes to right or left wing extremists online, Well, for one,

it's very hard. It's hard to identify what is extremism. It's hard to identify what exactly is hate speech. Words are very complicated in different contexts. In a particular case of Bowers, yes, it's very easy to identify what he was doing. He should have been found, it should have been taken down. But as a general principle, it's very difficult to identify what has hates speech, what is not hates speech, and to set firm policies on that. It's difficult.

And we know that if we give them any leeway on this issue, it will invariably be used to the detriment of conservatives. It will be a situation where conservatives are the ones who find themselves though the rules will certainly be much more strictly enforced against the right if

they're enforced against the left at all. And here's you know, a very good example of exactly what I'm talking about is the fact that Louis Farrakon still has lots of social media, still is able to spew his hatred and intolerance. And this is also why I just find so much of the media's effort over the weekend to try and create this narrative of right wing extremism is responsible for all or almost all of the anti Semitism in this country, when that's just not the case. It's not the case

at all. And you know, here are the kind of things that Farikon, who you know, gets deposed in photos with Barack Obama when he's running for the presidency. Remember that, Oh that's right. Journalists hid that from the public because they didn't want us to see what was really going on there. But Farrikon is still treated as somebody by the media who should have and does have a voice. He's not deep platformed, he's not pushed off of all the different social media outlets. But here's the kind of

stuff that Minister farah Con says, Play fourteen. I wonder will you recognize Satan? I wonder will you see the Satanic jew and the Synagogue of Satan, which has many races in it, because Satan has deceived the whole world. Think about what they're gonna say when they have been so thoroughly and completely unmasked. Whenever you read that God has told the Jews to hear and obey, and they say I hear and I disobeyed, that's Satan openly disobeying God.

Pretty gross, pretty clearly anti Semitic. The Satanic Jew far Akon says, and he's still somebody that prominent Democrats can hang out with in public, can can speak with, whether it's commentators or politicians. Uh, you'll notice that you don't have Democrat presidential contenders asked the way that the way that Republicans are asked about David Duke, a loser that nobody cares about, and nobody you know, gives it, you know,

what to hear from. All Republicans have to be asked in every presidential cycle, Well, do you disavowed David Duke? Do you just about David Duke? Why isn't every Democrat asked do you disavow? Do you disavow Louis Farrakon? Why wasn't Barack Obama asked do you disavow Louis Farrakon? Why wasn't. Hillary Clinton asked, do you disavow Farrakon? Oh, that's right. You mean the media is dishonest and their activists and they're so sensitive about it now because we now all

are figuring out the truth. Yeah, that's right, that's what I thought. You know what's not smart? Just sort of posting stuff on the web when you've got a job opening and hoping that someone who's great sees it. You know, it's not smart spending a ton of time trying to track down all the different places online you've posted because you don't even remember because you don't know what the best one was. You know what is smart? Going to zip recruiter dot com slash buck to hire the right person.

Zip Recruiter doesn't depend on candidates finding you, It finds them for you. It's powerful matching technology scans thousands of resumes, identifies people with the right skills, education, and experience for your job, and invites them to apply so you get qualified candidates fast and right now. My listeners can try zip recruiter for free at this exclusive web address, zip recruiter dot com slash buck. That's zip recruiter dot com

slash buck again. One more time to try it totally free, zip recruiter dot com slash buck because zip recruiter is the smartest way to hire. One thing to remember is that when Trump says that the only thing that would have been able, that would have been able to protect these people is arm guards. When when they say the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun, what they're trying to do is sell you two guns. Uh. That's

David Hogg, who is now an adult. I believe he's eighteen, so we can't play or he's just a kid thing anymore, which the left was doing for a while, and they really use this kid in order to try and destroy careers, and and he was having remarkable success by leading some boycotts.

And you know, he's now a young pundit. I mean, and now we've we've reached this stage in the American commentary game where we we increasingly think that the the the the younger somebody is, the more exciting their opinions are. I've got to tell you that, you know, honestly, if if you're not yet thirty, I have a really hard time wanting to hear your political or policy analysis I'm

not saying it's impossible. I'm just saying pretty much, don't care with with with very very few exceptions, you know, I don't need to hear from eighteen year olds about complex issues of policy like firearms in general. Now I'm open to my mind being changed by any individual on that. You know, there are people who are incredibly well informed it twenty but just I'm saying, as a general rule, I don't really want to hear from somebody who's twenty

two about what the truth of the Constitution is. It's it's it's rare that they're going to have a perspective on that that I find particularly illuminating. And David Hogg just goes around spewing talking points and never really engages with the real argument on the other side. Uh, this, this is those thing that it's all about the n r A and blood money and they just want to sell you whatever they need to sell you in order to make more money in the n RA is just

all about gun sales. This is distasteful at best. And and honestly Hogg was running around just straight up saying that people had blood on their hands and that they needed to a tone for being complicit in all these ask killings and these murders by adopting the left wing position on guns. You know, it's this issue of of firearms. Firearms is the only issue I see where ignorance on

the left is really celebrated. You know. They they almost take a certain delight in calling things that are semi automatic fully automatic, in referring to a a magazine as a clip, and referring to a you know, a handgun as a submachine gun. I mean, all these different they make all these errors that that they don't view as credibility destroying, and I think it's really because they do

it to stick their thumb in the eye. The other side say, it doesn't even all these guns are bad, don't you see, I don't have to know about them. I just know that guns are bad. That becomes the default position. You know. We had a member of a t F former member of a t F today on Rising and I've got to engage them a bit. I mean, he works for Gaddy Gifford's now as a lobbyist, so he's clear he's very anti gun. And I think it's interesting that people think because he worked for eight the

a t F, he must be favorable to the Second Amendment. Meanwhile, I turned around and I say, why do we have an agency? And I should have asked this question. I honestly just ran out of the time because I had to push back on a few other things, which I'll

get to in a moment. But why is it that we even have a federal agency that's a law enforcement agency with its own squat, with its own you know, all these armed personnel whose job is the additional special regulation of legal and in one case, constitutionally protected items alcohol, legal, tobacco, legal firearms, constitutionally protected and explosives are which are you know, can be legal. It depends on the circumstances. But why do we even have that federal agency? But I think

that's a better question. Why not just abolish the a t F. I don't think it should exist because I think that when you create a federal law enforcement agency that has as its mission arresting people for firearms violations, for example, and and and that that's a specific mission set that it has, it's gonna work really hard to try to find people to nab on firearms offenses. And there's a lot of complicated firearms rules across the country.

You know, I have had a fair number of people over the years try to lecture me on how, oh buck, it's on you, as a legal gun owner to know the laws of the state you're in, And okay, true, but guess what. There are some states where even the police don't really know what's legal and what's illegal because it's not clear based on how the laws are written.

Here's one for you in New York City, if you have a handgun permit, if you have a legal premise permit for a handgun and you want to take it out of the city in a New York state, does New York State have reciprocity? Depending on who you ask, I've got a totally different answers about that, um. And then when you add into it the practice that New

York was engaged in for a while. I mean, I just know the gun laws are the best because I lived there for so long where people whose flights were div hear, did people whose flights were diverted to think about this. You're you're flying from you know, Chicago to uh Miami, Let's say, and oh, this would be a pretty bad route. You know, you know, you hit bad weather on the way to Miami, so they divert your

flight to New York. And now you're there and you have a handgun that you checked legally, which in Chicago would be hard enough as it is, but let's just assume you checked it legally with the airline. You un check it because now you've gotta get another flight the next day when you go back to check in with your next flight. They've arrested people for that, for not having a premise permit for New York City and having a firearm in in New York, they've arrested and they

know that's why, that's why they had the gun. So I'm just saying that they look to penalize people. I mean, there's a an aggressive attitude about gun owners that some law enforcement agencies, and I think a t F is very high on that list that some law enforcement agencies adopt in a way that is I think puts them attention with the Constitution and and is really problematic. But anyway, but with a Hog and these others about the guns,

it just gets so boring. After a while, they know that they're not really going to get this band on fires. The guy spoke through today from a t F, I remember his name doesn't really matter. He wants His solution to the gun problem is to have all semi automatic rifles, all semi automatic rifles, because, as he said, a rifle that can kill a deer can kill a human. So that's what he said. All semi autmatic rifles need to be licensed at the same level that a fully automatic

rifle is. Right now, that's his new solutions, So you might be hearing that more and more. And I said, oh, do you really think that I could get a fully I live in d C. Do you think that I could even get a fully automatic weapon here, no matter what I tried to do, no matter what my background is. And he didn't know the answer, And I said, the

answer is no, dude. I'm just kind of shocked. This guy worked the a t F for twenty five years and seems like he doesn't know the gun laws that well, which was surprising except for the fact that he's obviously an anti gun zellot. But that's the truth. And you know, this is what you're gonna see. People who are not particularly well versed and what's real and what's not with these issues aren't very strong on the second amend. But

we'll pretend to be. They say, well, you know, I think you should be able to have a twelve gage shotgun, you know, Elmer Fudd style, maybe a side by side from way back in the day. And that's enough to you know with with twenty gage shotgun shells with bird shot. That's how you can protect yourself. Well, that's all well

and doing. That's all well and good until somebody pulls out a you know, a glock nineteen with a full chamber, and you know you're a full magazine rather and you're trying to defend yourself against them, and you've got you've got two shots of twenty gauge bird shot. I I want the I want the bad guy part of that equation. I want to be on. I wanna be armed the way they're armed. I don't want to be armed with the legal twenty gage shotgun. Although some of your like Buck,

I could take him out with a four ten. I know, I know you could, but you know I'm I like having a bigger spread. I prefer the twelve gage if I have to. Personally. Um, we have a whole bunch of more coming up, including the controversy over up who stay with me? Some special time. I get to stand around watching you self fatty poisons to overfeed Americans think that would deter me, but no, look please, can you just take the children home? The porno magazine buyers are

too embarrassed to make them move. Look, come on, all right, So there you have a Pooh from The Simpsons. And

this comes after the reports late last week. Now appose one of the more recognizable characters on that show, who is not Willie Willie the groundskeeper, um, but a Pooh, is you know, about to get written out of the show, according to reports from last week, because you can't have well, a couple of things, right, he's a an Indian uh Quickie mark owner and so he's an inconvenience store owner and you can have you know, Indians and seven eleven.

You're you're not allowed to to have that stereotype anymore in pop culture and media. And we've talked about, you know, the war on a Pooh before, but now they finally decided that it's not just that there there were some concerns or some ideas out there that they were going to have somebody else voice a Pooh because Hank Azaria, who is the the guy who voices him as a

white guy. He does a whole lot of voices. He's a voice actor, but he's a white guy voicing a brown guy, which is obviously on the for the social justice left, it's a big no no. But they're actually just going to at least the The latest supporting I saw is, yeah, that's right there writing him out of the show, saying that you know that that they're running out of the show. Now. Some people are pushing back on that, saying that it's not true that he's not

being written out of the show. And I think they're responding to the backlash year because people were saying, really, this is where it is now now you you can't have this cartoon character has been around for twenty years, and I would note a pooh is, yes, he's a stereotype on this show. For sure, there's no question. Right, he's a stereotype. But he's also not you know, he's a family man, he's a successful business owner. I really mean that. I mean it's not he's not being put down.

In fact, he's often used on the show to highlight the silliness, stupidity, and slavinliness of other people, whereas you know, he's actually kind of living the American dream. He's got a nice wife. You heard her on the when we came into the second there. He's got a whole bunch of kids. He's a business owner. I mean, you know, there's what a lot of people aspire to in this country for themselves, and and he's not. You know, there's this big difference between laughing at and laughing with A

Pooh is not. I've seen enough of the symptoms. I've seen many episodes, certainly not all of them. It's been on for twenty years. But A who is a laughed with character. You know, you're laughing with him. You find him funny. He does insightful political comm and terry. Yes he has an accent, and yes there's some stereotypes behind it, but it's all being used for the purpose of not just entertainment but also uh insight, And I just think

that they're being really unfair to the character. But I would say this, you know, over the weekend, because the political correctness thing, everyone hates it, except for the of the country or so that are just social justice left maniacs. Everyone hates this cult of political correctness, this idea that we can't laugh at anything anymore. Nothing is allowed to

be funny anymore. Everything has to be treated with this, you know, this deadly seriousness, and there's no way for us to just be normal people who can laugh at things that a normal person would find funny. We all reject this, but we find ourselves still stuck in this totalitarian psychological prison all the time of the politically correct speech and thought police. But I'm kind of happy though

that they're not. I'd rather than get rid of a Pooh than just you know, do what they usually do, which is either take the character and remove any hint of humor from him. Right, So, now, all of a sudden, a Woho is gonna have like an English accent and be a Harvard professor and just make fun of like the stupid fat white people like the Simpsons character Homer all the time. You know. That's that's one way that they would go. That social justice the warriors would want

this to go. Uh and and another way that they would go would be to use him to make social justice, you know, to make more social justice related points. You know, now, all of a sudden, who is so I just I don't want any of that, you know, it's just part of me is happy they'd rather get rid of this

character than destroy the character. I think that's a that's one maybe silver lining this whole thing, but it's just indicative of how I don't even know what what's allowed to be what's allowed to be funny anymore, because you know it's gonna change in a year, and not based on humor, but based on what is acceptable, based on where the left wing draws these boundaries in these lines, and something as as really honestly durable in the comedy world,

as The Simpsons has been around for decades. There are college courses taught on the social commentary and the Simpsons, believe it or not, that's a real thing, and The Simpsons has really stood the test of time. When The Simpsons isn't safe anymore, then you know there's really nothing and there's so little out there that I find funny. It's so often the case that humor is now blended with political commentary because it's a it's a cheap and an easy way to try to build audience right away.

What you do is you signal from the left that you hate the right people, and then they're more prone to pretend you're not funny. Jokes are funny, and this is what you have with Amy Schumer. She's not funny. She just plays the politics right, and people pretend like she's a comedian. She's not a comedian. She's a crappy political commentary. Uh, you know person, I mean, spokesperson or whatever you wanna call her, pundit who also makes jokes. There's a lot of that these days and not a

lot of actual comedy. So you know, a Pooh looks like he's gone. That's the way this country is going these days. Team Bucket, it's time for roll call. All right, it is roll call time. You know what that means. Time to get this funky party started. All right, here we go. We have aries our buddy rights book. Why don't you organize a movement where Christian patriots across this country contact or local synagogues and offered provide security in

order to protect the First Amendment. I don't know what the gun laws are in p A, but I think it'd be a very powerful message if you lead the way with over a thousand patriots standing by to protect our Jewish brothers and sisters. You may have to reach out to your contacts at Rush, Shawn and Glenn and Fake Tapper to garner enough support, maybe partner with Bongino. His audience is pretty active. They don't have to be armed.

A bunch of unarmed dudes and magahats telling the world you got you gotta go through us first would send a powerful message to both sides, to the craziest, this is still America. This crap is not acceptable that they pulled. Uh, you know areas. I like your idea. I would just say that there's a lot of um because you know, I would stand in defense of any of our Jewish brothers and sisters at their places of worship or anywhere else in this country for that matter. Um. But whether

people would really want there to be armed guards. You know, this gets into a philosophical discussion about how best to defend places of worship. I know that there are armed guards at the synagogue. There's a synagogue online block where I grew up in New York City, and there I've seen armed guards there. So it's not that unusual. And and in fact, there are other places around the world where they have to armed guards that don't get much

in the way of religious houses of worship. I mean, for example, in Catholic churches in some parts of Nigeria they have to have armed security personnel because of safety concerns. So I would just note that I like the idea and I appreciate you reaching out, my friend. Always good to hear from you. Frank, right, I heard you talking about Peaky Blinders. My wife and I love the series, but I highly recommend putting on closed captioning helps with

understanding some of the dialogue. Uh yeah, Frank, it's funny. My little sister told me the same thing, and you guys are right. I fancy myself pretty good at being able to catch bits of Anglo Irish dialect and think that I'm pretty savvy at it. But Peaky Blinders, man, there's stuff where all of a sudden you're in this really critical scene there Dosh you babe, d and you're like, wait, what was that? What? You have no idea? What was

just said? So, especially in Bammingham, Bammingham, that's how they all say it, apparently not we say it in America. Birmingham. They're all Bammingham. So you gotta have that ready to go. You gotta you gotta be prepared for the differences in the dialect. Uh, Steven right, hold on a second. Oh, this is great, Stephen said in a photo of his family on with Halloween costumes. Here's heard you talking about Halloween costumes. Wanted to share my family and I did

for trick or treat at church this weekend. Trunk entreat is like trick or treat, except you do it in a lot and contained parking lot instead of dark streets. We were the Ninja Turtles this year, Shields High. Well, it sounds like a nice idea about it, Nina. Turtles are great, the boys are serious and in true for Michelangelo. My wife is goofing off a friend ninto someent hats and we had turtle shells as well. Steven, you guys look great, man. I I love it. You know, a

whole family in Ninja Turtle costumes. Teenage Ninja Turtles, I've I've always been a fan of and I really liked the cartoon growing up, and then also even the first Ninja Turtles movie. I saw that so many times. I really I really enjoyed it, but people thought it was of intense and violent at the time. If you go back and and check it out, you'll you'll see what I mean, but it was. It's a good movie. I

really enjoyed it, and it's a really creative concept. Who would think that turtles in uh nuclear waste, named after Renaissance painters who have ninja skills would be a hit? Well, it was there you have it, Gary, Hey Buck, greetings from team Buck Hungary. I took your advice and started watching the first season of Peaky Blinders, um and last night it was awesome. I'm a hook thanks to the recommendation. I'm all for the next week and that is what

I'll be doing in the evenings. Love what you do, brother, keep it up. Shields tie Gary, Well, Gary, shields tie to you. And I'm so glad you like Peaky Blinders. I really, I really do enjoy it. I think it's a very entertaining, very well done, very entertaining show. A little bleak for sure, but it's uh, it's well executed. The writing is good and and there's some very interesting

us and turns in it. I started watching the third season of Daredevil over the weekend, which I would have to say, you know, the thing about Daredevil is that it's also a little bit dark, a little bleak. I think it's well executed for what it is. I just can't understand how they made Daredevil such a compelling show at Netflix and they made Iron Fist, which was just unwatchable garbage. I mean, Iron Fist was trash. It's also a superhero story, also set in New York, same you

know platform with Netflix. You'd think they would have some idea how to do it. The Iron Fist got canceled, and thank heavens because it was such a piece of of waste and anyway, but I have to say I think that Daredevil three so far is it's a little slow and getting going, but so far it's it's pretty well done. I find the acting all very good. I enjoyed the performances. Even if you're not that into superhero stuff, I think you might like Daredevil. I think you might

find Daredevil to be a pretty good show. Uh, Carla Shield tie Buck. Watch you on Brett Bear the other day with a B. Loved her comment about someone writing his comments about the bomber on teleprompter, like no one ever did that before. Love the show. Saw the pick of you and your parents in d C. Looks like your dad has the same swoop. Carla, thank you for the kind of comments about my appearance on Brett Bear.

I I think that I was able to say exactly what I really wanted to under the circumstances, which is always which I think is very important for whenever you get one of those performances, whenever you're doing that. I also went on Shannon Show on Friday, as you guys know, so that was another chance for me to say what was really on my mind. Uh And as to my dad, yeah, my dad has great hair. It's true, great hair. He's got it. He's got a silver swoop now, in fact,

that could probably be his call sign, silver Swoop. But it was so good to see my parents. Um, I've got the best parents in the world, so that's a big advantage that I've had in life. You know, I know you've probably got great parents too, but there your parents are probably the second best parents in the world, I think minor number one, but we can agree to disagree on that. Uh. So it was it was great to see them. We had a lot of fun and it's nice to get some visitors down here in the swamp.

Man the swamp can feel a little a little lonely. Not enough Team Buck in the swamp. Gotta be honest with your team, Buck, You guys are spread out all around the country, and a lot of you are in states where you've got you've got fellow patriots all around. You're not like me deep behind enemy lines could be crazy. Uh, let's see, Misty Rights. What do those of us in liberal California do about the fact that we are surrounded

by these crazies? Well, you know it's there's no easy answers. Um. I wish I could say that I had a straightforward do this to tell you, But you know, I think you engage where you can and that's it. You know, you don't where you think. It's a bad idea, It's not worth it sometimes, Jennifer rights, hey Buck. Yesterday I attended a lecture presentation by Arthur Sulzberger, chairman of the New York Times, called the Impact of Media and Truth

on Democracy. I went with an open mind, as I always try to approach things in life this way, because many people have surprised me over the years. However, I found salzburger statements so cliche and uninteresting. He said, all the things you talked about recently on your show, Speaking Truth to Power, How we live in dangerous times, journalists are unsafe, etcetera, etcetera. I lost track of how many times he used the words danger or dangerous. However, he's

definitely a capitalist. He bragged out of the New York Times successfully monetize their online media, and when asked a question from the audience about how The New York Times could be more accessible in the middle class, Salzburger said, the cost of paying for The New York Times is worth it in order to get the truth. When you find yourself a northern Califor and again, I could arrange

to have you speak at our local university. We need to hear more conservative voices, especially on campuses in California. Keep fighting a good fight, shields high, Jennifer. Oh, thank you Jennifer for that interesting perspective and and telling me what's going on with that Sulzberger lecture. That's not surprising at all, by the way, and the New York Times is in many ways the most arrogant of all media

out there, and and it's left wing. And I don't know how many of you saw this, but last week I asked their chief White House correspondent for The New York Times, are you a liberal paper, and he said no, and I just look at him like, dude, I understand that. You know, that's the that's the company line. But come on, man, really, we're gonna do this. We're really gonna do The New York Times is not liberal because oh, the editorial page is liberal, but the overall paper is is just a newspaper. No,

that is not true. The New York Times is a liberal paper and they should just own it, you know that. They shouldn't beat around the bush and pretend there's something that they're not. I don't see this as really all that complicated. I really don't, but they they make it

complicated because they like the pretense of being neutral. They think that neutrality and objectivity heightens the strength of their voice, whereas if they admitted to partisanship even though they're hyperpartisan, then they could not claim to just be the truth objectivity. They're clearly not that though. And we'll stop with We'll stop with this one buck. You missed the anniversary of the Battle of a Panto Brandon. You're right. I am so sorry. I forgot to tell you guys all about Lepanto.

If you want to go to go to Google and type in the Buck Sexton Show and the Battle of Lepanto, and you can listen to the old le Panto Show for old time's sake. You're right, I did miss Lepanto Anniversary this year, though I'm I'm slipping in my old age, Tyler writes, love your show man, Shieldside, Tyler, you're the man. Thank you. I'm gonna end on that tonight because I like it. Shieldside to you two and to all of

you at home. She time. You might have seen the headlines from the last week or so now they're starting to blame social media sites that don't do enough in order to get rid of content that they decide is violent. Who's they, Oh, that's right, the left wing media, the people that are trying to tell you that they're progressive. Ideology just so happens to constantly result in the censorship of conservatives. But you know, it's the algorithm and there's

nothing really going on there, malarkey. You know it. You want a place where you can go and share your thoughts, that's snippy dot com. I've got a snippy dot com account, and I love being able to interact with folks there and read their postings and know that the post is the post. Okay, you get to have your opinion heard. You don't have to worry about any of the progressive censorship or nonsense from Facebook. Snippy dot com thousands of Team buck folks have already signed up and joined. You

should check it out for yourself. S n I P p y dot com Again, that's snippy dot com.